alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 45 (Tuesday, March 9, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 10692-10693]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4603]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 80

[WT Docket No. 04-257 and RM-10743; FCC 10-6]


Maritime Communications

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications Commission published in the Federal 
Register of February 2, 2010 (75 FR 5241), a document in the Maritime 
Radio Services, WT Docket No. 04-257, which included a Final Rules 
Appendix that reflected the amended adoption of a certain rule. This 
document corrects the amendment of that section as set forth below.

DATES: March 9, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stana Kimball, Mobility Division, 
Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3d6e495c53544e515c4b5c137654505f5c51517d7b7e7e135a524b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="56052237383f253a372037781d3f3b34373a3a1610151578313920">[email protected]</span></a> or at 
(202) 418-1306, or TTY (202) 418-7233.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Communications Commission 
published a document in the Federal Register of February 2, 2010 (75 FR 
5241) to ensure that its rules governing the Maritime Radio Services 
continue to promote maritime safety, maximize effective and efficient 
use of the spectrum available for maritime communications, accommodate 
technological innovation, avoid unnecessary regulatory burdens, and 
maintain consistency with international maritime standards to the 
extent consistent with the United States public interest. This document 
corrects a rule amendment set forth in the document published in the 
Federal Register of February 2, 2010 (75 FR 5241).
    In rule FR Doc. 2010-2095 published on February 2, 2010 (75 FR 
5241), make the following correction:


Sec.  80.385  [Corrected]

0
On page 5241, in the third column, revise paragraph (a)(1) to read as 
follows:
    ``(a) * * *
    (1) The Automated Maritime Communications System (AMTS) is an 
automated maritime telecommunications system.''


[[Page 10693]]


Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-4603 Filed 3-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2015354EN.01003301.xml

| 26.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 354/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 354/33

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2015 — EE v OHIM (Representation of white dots on an ivory background)

(Case T-144/14) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Application for a Community figurative mark representing white dots on an ivory background - Absolute ground for refusal - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2015/C 354/37)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: EE Ltd (Hatfield, United Kingdom) (represented by: P. Brownlow, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Bonne, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 7 January 2014 (Case R 705/2013-1) relating to an application for registration as a Community trade mark of a figurative sign representing white dots on an ivory background.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders EE Ltd to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EE Ltd to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 135, 5.5.2014.

1

---
<PAGE>   1

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549


                                    FORM 8-K
                                 CURRENT REPORT


                     Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
                         Securities Exchange Act of 1934



Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported) August 13, 1999

                              THE LOEWEN GROUP INC.
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
    British Columbia, Canada                 0-18429                         98-0121376
-------------------------------      ------------------------    ---------------------------------
<S>                                  <C>                         <C>
(State or other jurisdiction of      (Commission File Number)    (IRS Employer Identification No.)
         incorporation)
</TABLE>




           4126 Norland Avenue, Burnaby, British Columbia       V5G 3S8
           ----------------------------------------------       -------
                (Address of principal executive offices)       (zip code)



Registrant's telephone number, including area code 604-299-9321
                                                  ------------------------------


                                       N/A
          -------------------------------------------------------------
          (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)




                                                      Exhibit Index is on page 3
                                                                     Page 1 of 7
<PAGE>   2

ITEM 5. OTHER EVENTS.

Pursuant to Form 8-K, General  Instructions F, registrant hereby incorporates by
reference the press release attached hereto as Exhibit 99.


ITEM 7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND EXHIBITS.

        Exhibit No.   Description

        Exhibit 99    The Loewen Group Inc. Press Release dated August 13, 1999


                                   SIGNATURES

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

Dated: August 13, 1999

                                            THE LOEWEN GROUP INC.



                                            By: /s/ BRADLEY D. STAM
                                            Name: Bradley D. Stam
                                            Title: Senior Vice President, Law



<PAGE>   3

                                  EXHIBIT INDEX



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                   Sequential
Number         Exhibit                                             Page Number
-------        -------                                             -----------
<S>            <C>                                                 <C>

99             The Loewen Group Inc.                                    4
               Press Release dated August 13, 1999
</TABLE>
1

 
and the Original Agreement, the terms of this First Amendment shall supercede those of the OriginalAgreement.4. Except as expressly agreed and amended herein, all of the terms and conditions of theOriginal Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.5. This First Amendment shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the lawsof the Republic of Korea, without giving effect to the rules respecting its conflicts of lawsprinciples.6. This First Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemedas an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed and delivered this FirstAmendment as of the day and year first above written.      OCI Company Ltd. Evergreen Solar Inc.       By:   /s/ MinKyu Lim By:   /s/ Richard G. Chleboski  Name: MinKyu Lim  Name: Richard G. Chleboski  Title: Executive Vice President  Title: Vice President 
2
```

[115th Congress Public Law 297]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 132 STAT. 4381]]

Public Law 115-297
115th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 362 North Ross Street in Beaverton, Michigan, as the ``Colonel Alfred 
       Asch Post Office''. <<NOTE: Dec. 6, 2018 -  [H.R. 6116]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. COLONEL ALFRED ASCH POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 362 North Ross Street in Beaverton, Michigan, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Colonel Alfred Asch Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Colonel 
Alfred Asch Post Office''.

    Approved December 6, 2018.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 6116:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018):
            Sept. 13, considered and passed House.
            Nov. 15, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7702 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7702

  To direct the Comptroller General of the United States to submit a 
    report to Congress on vessel fires and responses, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 15, 2024

 Mr. Menendez introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Comptroller General of the United States to submit a 
    report to Congress on vessel fires and responses, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GAO REPORT ON VESSEL FIRES.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States 
shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of 
the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, 
and Transportation of the Senate a report on the state of marine 
firefighting authorities, jurisdiction, plan review, and other 
considerations with respect to vessel fires at waterfront facilities 
and within the navigable waters of the United States up to 3 nautical 
miles from the shoreline.
    (b) Contents.--In carrying out subsection (a), the Comptroller 
General shall--
            (1) examine factors that affect Federal and non-Federal 
        collaboration aimed at reducing vessel and waterfront facility 
        fire risk to local communities;
            (2) focus on the prevalence and frequency of vessel fires 
        described in subsection (a); and
            (3) make recommendations for preparedness, responses to, 
        training for, and other items for consideration.
                                 <all>
```
§ 803.40 If I am an importer, what reporting requirements apply to me? ( a ) *Reports of deaths or serious injuries.* You must submit a report to us, and a copy of this report to the manufacturer, as soon as practicable, but no later than 30 calendar days after the day that you receive or otherwise become aware of information from any source, including user facilities, individuals, or medical or scientific literature, whether published or unpublished, that reasonably suggests that one of your marketed devices may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury. You must submit the information required by § 803.42. Reports sent to the Agency must be submitted in accordance with the requirements of § 803.12(a).
( b ) *Reports of malfunctions.* You must submit a report to the manufacturer as soon as practicable but no later than 30 calendar days after the day that you receive or otherwise become aware of information from any source, including user facilities, individuals, or through your own research, testing, evaluation, servicing, or maintenance of one of your devices, that reasonably suggests that one of your devices has malfunctioned and that this device or a similar device that you market would be likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if the malfunction were to recur. You must submit the information required by § 803.42. Reports to manufacturers may be made in accordance with § 803.11(b).
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-14-0001114

18-MAR-2015

08:25 AM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF LADISH CO., INC. AS OF AND FOR THE
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         1,632
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  38,308
<ALLOWANCES>                                   340
<INVENTORY>                                    55,994
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               95,888
<PP&E>                                         165,159
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (73,181)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 204,271
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          58,559
<BONDS>                                        20,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       143
<OTHER-SE>                                     84,797
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   204,271
<SALES>                                        170,665
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               170,665
<CGS>                                          145,053
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  8,482
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               91
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,486)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                15,735
<INCOME-TAX>                                   2,832
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            12,903
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   12,903
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.98
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.94



</TABLE>
# C_2014129EN.01000901.xml

| 28.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/9

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 13 January 2014 — J.B.G.T. Miljoen; Other party: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

(Case C-10/14)

(2014/C 129/11)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant in cassation: J.B.G.T. Miljoen

Other party to the appeal in cassation: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Questions referred

| 1. | Does the application of Article 63 TFEU require that the comparison of a non-resident with a resident in a case such as the present, in which dividend tax was withheld on a dividend payment by the source State, be extended to the income tax payable on the dividend income, against which, in the case of residents, the dividend tax is set off? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does the application of Article 63 TFEU require that the comparison of a non-resident with a resident in a case such as the present, in which dividend tax was withheld on a dividend payment by the source State, be extended to the income tax payable on the dividend income, against which, in the case of residents, the dividend tax is set off?

| 2. | If the answer to Question 1 is in the affirmative, in the assessment as to whether the effective tax burden for a non-resident is heavier than the tax burden for a resident, should a comparison be made between the Netherlands dividend tax withheld in respect of the non-resident and the Netherlands income tax payable by a resident, calculated in respect of the flat-rate income which, in the year in which the dividends were received, is attributable to the total holding of investment shares in Netherlands companies, or does European Union law require that a different standard of comparison be taken into account? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the answer to Question 1 is in the affirmative, in the assessment as to whether the effective tax burden for a non-resident is heavier than the tax burden for a resident, should a comparison be made between the Netherlands dividend tax withheld in respect of the non-resident and the Netherlands income tax payable by a resident, calculated in respect of the flat-rate income which, in the year in which the dividends were received, is attributable to the total holding of investment shares in Netherlands companies, or does European Union law require that a different standard of comparison be taken into account?

---
# C_2015221EN.01002001.xml

| 6.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/20

---

Order of the General Court of 30 April 2015 — Alnapharm v OHIM — Novartis (Alrexil)

(Case T-839/14) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate))

(2015/C 221/27)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Alnapharm GmbH & Co. KG (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: H. Heldt, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: H. O'Neill, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Novartis AG (Basel, Switzerland)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 October 2014 (Case R 1723/2013-4) concerning opposition proceedings between Novartis AG and Alnapharm GmbH & Co. KG.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate in the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate in the action.

| 2. | The applicant and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of the costs incurred by the defendant. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of the costs incurred by the defendant.

---

(1)  OJ C 65, 23.2.2015.

1

---
Editorial Note on Part 862
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 862 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 862.1300 Follicle-stimulating hormone test system. ( a ) *Identification.* A follicle-stimulating hormone test system is a device intended to measure follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) in plasma, serum, and urine. FSH measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of pituitary gland and gonadal disorders.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 862.9.
[52 FR 16122, May 1, 1987, as amended at 65 FR 2306, Jan. 14, 2000]
# C_2019316EN.01000301.xml

| 20.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 316/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 316/3

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 16 September 2019

appointing one alternate member of the Management Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) for Romania

(2019/C 316/04)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2019/128 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 January 2019 establishing the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 337/75 (1), and in particular Article 4 thereof,

Having regard to the list of candidates submitted to the Council by the Governments of the Member States and by the employees' and the employers' organisations,

Whereas:

| (1) | By its Decisions of 9 April 2019 (2) and of 8 July 2019 (3), the Council appointed the members and alternate members of the Management Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the period from 1 April 2019 to 31 March 2023. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By its Decisions of 9 April 2019 (2) and of 8 July 2019 (3), the Council appointed the members and alternate members of the Management Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the period from 1 April 2019 to 31 March 2023.

| (2) | The Government of Romania has submitted one nomination for one post to be filled, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Government of Romania has submitted one nomination for one post to be filled,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is appointed alternate member of the Management Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) for the period ending on 31 March 2023:

GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVES

| Country | Member | Alternate member |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Romania | | Ms Felicia Ioana SĂNDULESCU |

Country

Member

Alternate member

Romania

Ms Felicia Ioana SĂNDULESCU

Article 2

The Council shall appoint the members and alternate members not yet nominated at a later date.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 16 September 2019.

For the Council

The President

T. TUPPURAINEN

---

(1)  OJ L 30, 31.1.2019, p. 90.

1

(2)  Council Decision of 9 April 2019 appointing the members and alternate members of the Management Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) (OJ C 136, 12.4.2019, p. 6).

2

(3)  Council Decision of 8 July 2019 appointing one member and one alternate member of the Management Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) for Lithuania (OJ C 232, 10.7.2019, p. 5).

3

---
Order entered November 1 4 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 12 - 00151 - CR No. 05 - 12 - 0015 2 - CR JAMES RANDOLPH BELL, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F11 - 70232 - H, F11 - 70233 - H 

### O RDER Before the Court are appellant’s Objection to Supplemental Clerk’s Record filed on June 19, 2013, and Objection to Second Supplemental Clerk’s Record filed on October 28, 2013. We OVERR ULE the objections.

/s/ JIM MOSELEY JUSTICE