alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018392EN.01001501.xml

| 29.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 392/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 392/15

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2018 — VTB Bank v Council

(Case T-734/14) (1)

((Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine - Applicant’s name included and retained in the list of entities to which the restrictive measures apply - Manifest error of assessment - Obligation to state reasons - Rights of the defence - Right to effective judicial protection - Right to property - Right to carry on an economic activity))

(2018/C 392/18)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: VTB Bank PAO, formerly VTB Bank OAO (Saint Petersburg, Russia) (represented by: J. Ruiz Calzado, lawyer, C. Claypoole, Solicitor, and M. Lester QC)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: J.-P. Hix and S. Boelaert, Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Havas, T. Scharf and D. Gauci, Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment, first, of Council Decision 2014/512/CFSP of 31 July 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2014 L 229, p. 13), as amended by Council Decision 2014/659/CFSP of 8 September 2014 (OJ 2014 L 271, p. 54), and, secondly, of Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 of 31 July 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2014 L 229, p. 1), as amended by Council Regulation (EU) No 960/2014 of 8 September 2014 (OJ 2014 L 271, p. 3), in so far as those acts concern the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders VTB Bank PAO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders VTB Bank PAO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 16, 19.1.2015.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7728 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7728

              To repeal section 115 of the Clean Air Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 19, 2024

 Mr. Perry (for himself, Mr. Mooney, Mr. Biggs, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
and Mr. Ogles) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
              To repeal section 115 of the Clean Air Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Energy Sovereignty Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL.

    (a) In General.--Section 115 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7415) 
is repealed.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 110(a)(2)(D)(ii) of the Clean 
Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2)(D)(ii)) is amended by striking ``sections 
126 and 115 (relating to interstate and international pollution 
abatement)'' and inserting ``section 126 (relating to interstate 
pollution abatement)''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000814458
<NAME>                        HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES, L.P.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         8,966,688
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4,771,773
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (4,200,344)
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         36,144,805
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (13,693,136)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 32,621,396
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     24,019,417
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   32,621,396
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               6,098,046
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  4,514,567
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               85,581
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             608,455
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                889,443
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                702,692
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,592,135
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS 

COASTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT COUNCIL 

Oliver II. Stedman Government Center 

4808 Tower Hill Road, Suite 3 

Wakefield, R.I. 02879-1900 

US Environmental Protection Agency 

Region 1 

5 Post Office Square; Suite 100 

Boston, MA 021 09 

RE: CRMC File No. A2011-12-055 

Dear Sirs/Madam: 

February 6, 2012 

(401) 783-3370 

FAX: (401) 783-3767 

In accordance with Title 15 of the code of Federal Regulations, Part 930, subpart C 

(Consistency for Federal Activities) and review of plans entitled: Vessel General Permit (VGP) and 

Small Vessel General permit (sVGP) Request for Determination for Coastal Zone Management 

Program Consistency Determination. 

The Coastal Resources Managemeni Council hereby concurs with the determination that the 

referenced project is consistent with the Federally approved Rhode Island Coastal Resources 

Management Council Program and applicable regulations therein. j 

Please contact this office upon initiation of construction, or if you should have any questions 

regarding this project. 

/lat 

s~£ Grover 

Coastal 

J. 

Resources 

Fugj, Ex~tor Management Council
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000813897
<NAME> MASTER L.P.I.
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         990,899
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,929
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               993,828
<PP&E>                                           7,695
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,695
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 993,828
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              512
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     993,316
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   993,828
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,624
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,624
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,624
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET FOR DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      15,796,070
<SECURITIES>                                 5,975,500
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,312,277
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,123,562
<INVENTORY>                                    683,408
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            31,841,151
<PP&E>                                       7,656,299
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,910,637
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              50,269,909
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,924,220
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       101,013
<OTHER-SE>                                  45,585,545
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                50,269,909
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            26,522,205
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,965,639
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            13,888,430
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,294,365
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             225,531
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,363,384
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,363,384
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,363,384
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .24
        

</TABLE>
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:Report on progress toward security and stability in Afghanistan and UnitedStates plan for sustaining the Afghanistan National Security Forces [electronicresource].**
 
2010
Apr | Nov
2011  
Apr | Oct
2012
Apr | Dec
 
SuDoc Number:D 1.130:
Item Number:0306-A-62 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000836187
 
June 20, 2018
# C_2014339EN.01001402.xml

| 29.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 339/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 339/14

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Rüsselsheim (Germany) lodged on 28 July 2014 — Annette Lorch, Kurt Lorch v Condor Flugdienst GmbH

(Case C-364/14)

2014/C 339/17

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Amtsgericht Rüsselsheim

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Annette Lorch, Kurt Lorch

Applicants:

Defendant: Condor Flugdienst GmbH

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Must the extraordinary circumstance within the meaning of Article 5(3) of Regulation No 261/2004 (1) relate directly to the booked flight? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must the extraordinary circumstance within the meaning of Article 5(3) of Regulation No 261/2004 (1) relate directly to the booked flight?

1

| 2. | If the first question is to be answered in the negative, how many earlier flights involving the aircraft to be used for the scheduled flight are relevant to the existence of an extraordinary circumstance? Is there a time-limit to the consideration of extraordinary circumstances which occur during earlier flights? If so, how is that time-limit to be calculated? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the first question is to be answered in the negative, how many earlier flights involving the aircraft to be used for the scheduled flight are relevant to the existence of an extraordinary circumstance? Is there a time-limit to the consideration of extraordinary circumstances which occur during earlier flights? If so, how is that time-limit to be calculated?

| 3. | If extraordinary circumstances which occur during earlier flights are also relevant to a later flight, must the reasonable measures to be taken by the operating air carrier, in accordance with Article 5(3) of the regulation, relate only to preventing the extraordinary circumstance or also to avoiding a long delay? |
| --- | --- |

3.

If extraordinary circumstances which occur during earlier flights are also relevant to a later flight, must the reasonable measures to be taken by the operating air carrier, in accordance with Article 5(3) of the regulation, relate only to preventing the extraordinary circumstance or also to avoiding a long delay?

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).

1

---
Exhibit 10.35
 AMENDMENT NO. 11 TO LOAN AGREEMENT
  RECITALS
   AGREEMENT
 Definitions
 Amendments
 2.1
    
    In Paragraph 1.2, the date December 1, 2010 is changed to
April 15, 2011.
 Representations and Warranties
 Conditions
 4.1
    
    If the Borrower or any guarantor is anything other than a
natural person, evidence, that the execution, delivery, and performance by the
Borrower and/or such guarantor of this Amendment and any instrument or
agreement required under this Amendment have been duly authorized.
 Effect of Amendment
 Counterparts
 -1-




---



##### 



ORAL AGREEMENTS OR ORAL COMMITMENTS TO LOAN MONEY, EXTEND CREDIT OR TO FORBEAR FROM
ENFORCING REPAYMENT OF A DEBT ARE NOT ENFORCEABLE UNDER WASHINGTON LAW
  BANK:
Bank of America, N.A.By:
    /s/ Robert BoswellRobert Boswell, Vice PresidentAuthorized SignerBORROWER(S):Ambassadors International, Inc.By:
    /s/ Mark T. DetillionMark T. Detillion, Chief Financial OfficerCypress Reinsurance, Ltd.By:
    /s/ Mark T. DetillionMark T. Detillion, Chief Financial OfficerAmbassadors Cruise Group, LLCBy:
    /s/ Mark T. DetillionMark T. Detillion, Chief Financial OfficerAmbassadors, LLC.By:
    /s/ Mark T. DetillionMark T. Detillion, Chief Financial Officer -2-
§ 606.40 Facilities. Facilities shall be maintained in a clean and orderly manner, and shall be of suitable size, construction and location to facilitate adequate cleaning, maintenance and proper operations. The facilities shall: ( a ) Provide adequate space for the following when applicable: ( 1 ) Private and accurate examinations of individuals to determine their eligibility as blood donors.
( 2 ) The withdrawal of blood from donors with minimal risk of contamination, or exposure to activities and equipment unrelated to blood collection.
( 3 ) The storage of blood or blood components pending completion of tests.
( 4 ) The quarantine storage of blood or blood components in a designated location pending repetition of those tests that initially gave questionable serological results.
( 5 ) The storage of finished products prior to distribution.
( 6 ) The quarantine storage, handling and disposition of products and reagents not suitable for use.
( 7 ) The orderly collection, processing, compatibility testing, storage and distribution of blood and blood components to prevent contamination.
( 8 ) The adequate and proper performance of all steps in plasmapheresis, plateletpheresis and leukapheresis procedures.
( 9 ) The orderly conduction of all packaging, labeling and other finishing operations.
( b ) Provide adequate lighting, ventilation and screening of open windows and doors.
( c ) Provide adequate, clean, and convenient handwashing facilities for personnel, and adequate, clean, and convenient toilet facilities for donors and personnel. Drains shall be of adequate size and, where connected directly to a sewer, shall be equipped with traps to prevent back-siphonage.
( d ) Provide for safe and sanitary disposal for the following: ( 1 ) Trash and items used during the collection, processing and compatibility testing of blood and blood components.
( 2 ) Blood and blood components not suitable for use or distribution.
[40 FR 53532, Nov. 18, 1975, as amended at 80 FR 29895, May 22, 2015]
CBI

Analytical 

Method CBI Composition

YY

YY

YY

YY

YY

YY

YY

YY

YY

YY

YY

YY

YY

YY

YY

YY

YY

YY

YY

YY

YY

YY

YY

YY

YY
NOT CBI-HFC Emissions

NOT CBI-Isocyanate emission from curing polyurethane adhesives

NOT CBI-Quantification of HFC Blowing Agent Emissions of Typical Appliance Insulating Foam by SL 

Aprahamian and JM Bowman API 2005

NOT CBI-Spray Foam Emissions
CBI

Y

Y

Y

N

N

N

N
The following are methods which are used in isocyanate manufacture and product testing, 

and are provided as background information for the analytical data being provided.

Method CBI

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

NOT CBI--ASTM Reactivity.pdf N
Method CBI YYY
CBI

NOT CBI - Bayer CPI paper Re-occupancyN

Not CBI - CPI Conf paper -Bayer SPF studyN

NOT CBI - BMS SPF reoccupancy ltr 10-25-2011NYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
CBI

Composition CBI Product Information Bulletins YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Technical Datasheets
CBI Material Safety Data Sheets CBI

N N

N N

N N

N N

N N

N N

N N

N N

N N

N N

N N

N N

N N

N N

N N

N N

Login for Material Safety Data Sheets
Report CBI YYYY
Report

Not CBI--BMS SPF Industrial Hygiene Reports

Not CBI--BMS Sampling Analytical Methods
CBI

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

N

N

Y

Y
#### People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Stout, Defendant-Appellant.

Gen. No. 11,101.

Fourth District.

April 1, 1969.

Lewis, Blickhan & Garrison, of Quincy, for appellant.

Doane G. Troné, City Attorney, of Rushville, for appellee.

SMITH, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant from a conviction for the violation of two sections of the ordinances of the *104City of Rushville. One was a disorderly conduct charge and the other was a fast driving charge. It appears from the record that there was a third charge for a violation of some State statute which was dismissed on motion of the State’s Attorney and the trial proceeded on violations of the city ordinance.

The proceedings for the violations of the city ordinance were apparently filed on criminal complaint forms in the Circuit Court of Schuyler County. The suit was instituted in the name of “The People of the State of Illinois” and one complaint charged disorderly conduct and disturbance of the peace in violation of a specified section of the revised ordinances of the City of Rushville and the second complaint was similarly drafted and charged the offense of fast driving. Both sides have treated this as if it were a criminal procedure and governed by the rules in criminal cases. In our judgment, this proceedings is civil and not criminal. City of Highland Park v. Curtis, 83 Ill App2d 218, 226 NE2d 870. On the merits, the case must be determined by People v. Stringfield, 37 Ill App2d 344, 185 NE2d 381, where a violation of the city ordinance of the City of Chicago was brought “in the name and by the authority of the People of the State of Illinois.” It was there held that actions for violations of ordinances must be brought in the corporate name of the municipality as required by Ill Rev Stats 1961, c 24, § 1-2-7, while prosecutions for State offenses were brought in the name of the People of the State of Illinois in accordance with art 6, § 33, of the Illinois State Constitution. Section 1-2-7 is not equivocal. It reads “all action brought to enforce any fine . . . shall be brought in the corporate name of the municipality, as plaintiff.” There was no compliance with this section and in its absence, the judgment of the trial court is a nullity at this stage in the proceedings. The People of the State of Illinois as a party had no interest in the enforcement of *105city ordinances. Accordingly, the judgment must be and it is hereby reversed.

Reversed.

TRAPP, P. J. and CRAVEN, J., concur.
§ 801.5 Medical devices; adequate directions for use. *Adequate directions for use* means directions under which the layman can use a device safely and for the purposes for which it is intended. Section 801.4 defines *intended use.* Directions for use may be inadequate because, among other reasons, of omission, in whole or in part, or incorrect specification of: ( a ) Statements of all conditions, purposes, or uses for which such device is intended, including conditions, purposes, or uses for which it is prescribed, recommended, or suggested in its oral, written, printed, or graphic advertising, and conditions, purposes, or uses for which the device is commonly used; except that such statements shall not refer to conditions, uses, or purposes for which the device can be safely used only under the supervision of a practitioner licensed by law and for which it is advertised solely to such practitioner.
( b ) Quantity of dose, including usual quantities for each of the uses for which it is intended and usual quantities for persons of different ages and different physical conditions.
( c ) Frequency of administration or application.
( d ) Duration of administration or application.
( e ) Time of administration or application, in relation to time of meals, time of onset of symptoms, or other time factors.
( f ) Route or method of administration or application.
( g ) Preparation for use, i.e., adjustment of temperature, or other manipulation or process.
Editorial Note on Part 862
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 862 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 862.3750 Quinine test system. ( a ) *Identification.* A quinine test system is a device intended to measure quinine, a fever-reducing and pain-relieving drug intended in the treatment of malaria, in serum and urine. Measurements obtained by this device are used in the diagnosis and treatment of quinine overdose and malaria.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I.
[52 FR 16122, May 1, 1987, as amended at 53 FR 21450, June 8, 1988; 65 FR 2310, Jan. 14, 2000]