alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.14.1    
  


 
 

AMENDMENT ONE TO THE
  EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT    
  


        This Amendment is hereby entered into effective as of February 1, 2002, by and between The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. (the "Company") and Edward
S. Knight (the "Executive"). 


W I T N E S S E T H  



        WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive entered into on December 29, 2000, an Employment Agreement (the "Employment Agreement"), providing for the
Executive's continued employment with the Company; and 


        WHEREAS,
the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Employment Agreement. 


        NOW
THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree as
follows: 



        1.    Section
4 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended by adding the following two new sentences at the end thereof: 




Notwithstanding
the foregoing, twenty percent (20%) of the Incentive Compensation, otherwise due and payable with respect to each calendar year (the "Retained Amount"), shall be retained by the
Company in accordance with the terms of the Company's Retention Component of the Incentive Compensation Program, as adopted by the Compensation Committee on January 23, 2002 (the "Retention
Policy"), as such policy may be amended from time to time. The Retained Amount shall be
credited with interest at the rate set forth in the Retention Policy and shall be due and payable pursuant to the terms of the Retention Policy. 





        2.    For
the avoidance of doubt, this Amendment shall in no way reduce or otherwise negatively impact: (i) the calculation of the SERP benefits due the Executive
pursuant to Section 5(b) of the Employment Agreement, or (ii) the amount of severance otherwise due and payable to the Executive in accordance with applicable subsection of
Section 9 of the Employment Agreement. 


        3.    Except
as specially set forth above, all other provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force effect. 






 

        IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed February 24, 2002. 



	 	By:	/s/ EDWARD S. KNIGHT
 Edward S. Knight
	

 	

 	

 
	 	THE NASDAQ STOCK MARKET, INC
	

 	

 	

 
	 	By:	/s/ H. FURLONG BALDWIN
 H. Furlong Baldwin, Chairman of

The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc.

Management Compensation Committee






2









QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.14.1


AMENDMENT ONE TO THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER****PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, Gerald Y. Ng, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of LOUD Technologies Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this reportis being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Dated:   March 28, 2008 By:  /s/ Gerald Y. Ng    Gerald Y. Ng    *Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President,Secretary and Treasurer*
# C_2016410EN.01001101.xml

| 7.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 410/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 410/11

---

Judgment of the General Court of 22 September 2016 — Tose’e Ta’avon Bank v Council

(Case T-435/14) (1)

1

((Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation - Freezing of funds - Plea of illegality - Conferral of an implementing power on the Council - Criterion directed at the entities providing support to the Iranian Government - Error of law - Error of fact - Obligation to state reasons - Proportionality - Fundamental rights))

(2016/C 410/13)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Tose’e Ta’avon Bank (Teheran, Iran) (represented by: J.-M. Thouvenin, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Vitro and M. Bishop, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of the decision of the Council of the European Union to maintain the applicant’s name on the list in Annex II to Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP of 26 July 2010 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Common Position 2007/140/CFSP (OJ 2010 L 195, p. 39) and on the list in Annex IX to Council Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 of 23 March 2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 (OJ 2012 L 88, p. 1), as set out in a notice of 15 March 2014.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Tose’e Ta’avon Bank to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Tose’e Ta’avon Bank to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 253, 4.8.2014.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Gregory A. Wells, Chief Financial
Officer of NTS Capital Corporation, the general partner of NTS-Properties Associates VII, the
general partner of NTS-Properties VII, Ltd. (the Partnership), certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

|1. |  | The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Partnership for the period ended June
               30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
               Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 16, 2004

/s/ Gregory A. Wells

---

Chief Financial Officer of NTS Capital Corporation,
General Partner of NTS-Properties Associates VII,
General Partner of NTS-Properties VII, Ltd.

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be
retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
#### Howard W. Sessions *v.*Arthur S. Sachs et al.

King, C. X, Alcorn, House, Cotter and Ryan, Js.

Argued January 9

decided January 9, 1969

*Howard W. Sessions,*pro se, the appellant (plaintiff).

*David B. Beiser,*assistant attorney general, with whom were *F. Michael Ahern,*assistant attorney general, and, on the brief, *Robert K. Killian,*attorney general, for the appellees (defendants).

*601Pee Curiam.

The court properly sustained the demurrer to the plaintiff’s prayers for relief. Practice Book § 108; *Holley*v. *McDonald,*154 Conn. 228, 233, 224 A.2d 727; *State ex rel. Scala*v. *Airport Commission,*154 Conn. 168, 176, 224 A.2d 236; *Boyko*v. *Weiss,*147 Conn. 183, 186, 158 A.2d 253; *Glens Falls Ins. Co.*v. *Somers,*146 Conn. 708, 713, 156 A.2d 146. It is not necessary to consider the court’s action granting the defendants’ motion to expunge an amendment to the complaint since a first notice of dismissal, dated February 15, 1967, was rescinded, and the plaintiff concedes that he took no appeal from the notice of dismissal dated March 7, 1967.

There is no error.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

     Arthur Andersen LLP, our independent public accountant, has represented to
us by letter dated April 15, 2002, that its audit of our consolidated financial
statements as of December 31, 2001 was subject to Andersen's quality control
system for its U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide reasonable
assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance with professional
standards and that there was appropriate continuity of Andersen personnel
working on the audit and availability of national office consultation.
Availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of Andersen is not relevant to
this audit.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Kelly W. Prentiss
    Vice President, Finance and
    Chief Financial Officer
§ 820.250 Statistical techniques. ( a ) Where appropriate, each manufacturer shall establish and maintain procedures for identifying valid statistical techniques required for establishing, controlling, and verifying the acceptability of process capability and product characteristics.
( b ) Sampling plans, when used, shall be written and based on a valid statistical rationale. Each manufacturer shall establish and maintain procedures to ensure that sampling methods are adequate for their intended use and to ensure that when changes occur the sampling plans are reviewed. These activities shall be documented.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         653,672
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,161,336
<ALLOWANCES>                                    24,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,755,050
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,778,528
<PP&E>                                       6,703,397
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,455,004
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,052,625
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,015,516
<BONDS>                                        397,443
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,334,000
<COMMON>                                           254
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,305,412
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,052,625
<SALES>                                      2,650,426
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,748,870
<CGS>                                        2,691,328
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,691,328
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,161,735
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             180,453
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,104,193)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (5,104,193)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,104,193)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,104,193)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.23)
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 864
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 864 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 864.9225 Cell-freezing apparatus and reagents for in vitro diagnostic use. ( a ) *Identification.* Cell-freezing apparatus and reagents for in vitro diagnostic use are devices used to freeze human red blood cells for in vitro diagnostic use.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 864.9.
[45 FR 60643, Sept. 12, 1980, as amended at 65 FR 2310, Jan. 14, 2000]
Exhibit 32

# CERTIFICATION

The undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:

(1)    The accompanying Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in the
accompanying Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:   February 3, 2005

| |  | /s/   Marti Morfitt                                | 
| |  | -------------------------------------------------- | 
| |  |                                                   
| |  | Marti Morfitt, President & Chief Executive Officer | 

Date:   February 3, 2005

| |  | /s/   Samuel E. Reinkensmeyer                                                           | 
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
| |  |                                                                                        
| |  | Samuel E. ReinkensmeyerVice President of Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer | 

---
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Anthony Sfarra, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports onForm 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report onForm 10-K of the Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-C30 (the"Exchange Act periodic reports");

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, takenas a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing andother information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the periodcovered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statementsrequired in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except asdisclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilledtheir obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteriafor asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessmentof compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required tobe included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB andExchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to thisreport, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances ofnoncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report onForm 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied oninformation provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

 

National Cooperative Bank, N.A., as NCB Master Servicer, RialtoCapital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, National Cooperative Bank, N.A., asNCB Special Servicer, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee,Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Trust Advisor, CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, asServicing Function Participant, Computershare Trust Company, NationalAssociation, as Servicing Function Participant for the CertificateAdministrator, and Computershare Trust Company, National Association, asServicing Function Participant for the Custodian.

 

 

 

Dated:March 10,2023

 

 

/s/ Anthony Sfarra

Anthony Sfarra

President

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
Exhibit 10.32
 AMENDMENT NO. 8 TO LOAN AGREEMENT
  RECITALS
   AGREEMENT
 Definitions
 Amendments
 2.1
    
    In the Subparagraph number 1.1 (a), the amount Two Million Two
Hundred Ninety-One Thousand Nine Hundred Twenty-Nine and 00/100 Dollars
($2,291,929.00) is changed to Five Hundred Twenty-Four Thousand Two Hundred
Seventy-Three and 00/100 Dollars ($524,273.00).2.2
    
    In the Subparagraph number 1.1 (c), the amount Two Million Two
Hundred Ninety-One Thousand Nine Hundred Twenty-Nine and 00/100 Dollars
($2,291,929.00) is changed to Five Hundred Twenty-Four Thousand Two Hundred
Seventy-Three and 00/100 Dollars ($524,273.00).2.3
    
    In the Subparagraph number 1.5(b), the amount Two Million Two
Hundred Ninety-One Thousand Nine Hundred Twenty-Nine and 00/100 Dollars
($2,291,929.00) is changed to Five Hundred Twenty-Four Thousand Two Hundred
Seventy-Three and 00/100 Dollars ($524,273.00).2.4
    
    Subparagraph number 1.B1(a) is hereby amended to read in its
entirety as follows:(a) Time deposits with the Bank and owned by the Borrower in an
amount not less than Five Hundred Twenty-Four Thousand Two Hundred
Seventy-Three and 00/100 Dollars ($524,273.00).
 -1-




---



##### 



Representations and Warranties
 Effect of Amendment
 Counterparts
 FINAL AGREEMENT . BY SIGNING THIS DOCUMENT EACH PARTY REPRESENTS AND AGREES THAT:
(A) THIS DOCUMENT REPRESENTS THE FINAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN PARTIES WITH RESPECT TO THE SUBJECT MATTER
HEREOF, (B) THIS DOCUMENT SUPERSEDES ANY COMMITMENT LETTER, TERM SHEET OR OTHER WRITTEN OUTLINE OF
TERMS AND CONDITIONS RELATING TO THE SUBJECT MATTER HEREOF, UNLESS SUCH COMMITMENT LETTER, TERM
SHEET OR OTHER WRITTEN OUTLINE OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS EXPRESSLY PROVIDES TO THE CONTRARY, (C)
THERE ARE NO UNWRITTEN ORAL AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE PARTIES, AND (D) THIS DOCUMENT MAY NOT BE
CONTRADICTED BY EVIDENCE OF ANY PRIOR, CONTEMPORANEOUS, OR SUBSEQUENT ORAL AGREEMENTS OR
UNDERSTANDINGS OF THE PARTIES.
  BANK:
Bank of America, N.A.By:
    /s/ Robert BoswellName:
    Robert Boswell, Vice PresidentTitle: -2-




---



##### 



BORROWER(S):Ambassadors International, Inc.By:
    /s/ Mark T. DetillionName:
    Mark T. DetillionTitle:
    Chief Financial OfficerAmbassadors, LLCBy:
    Ambassadors International, Inc., MemberBy:
    /s/ Mark T. DetillionName:
    Mark T. DetillionTitle:
    Chief Financial OfficerAmbassadors Cruise Group, LLCBy:
    Ambassadors International Inc., MemberBy:
    /s/ Mark T. DetillionName:
    Mark T. DetillionTitle:
    Chief Financial OfficerCypress Reinsurance, Ltd.By:
    /s/ Mark T. DetillionName:
    Mark T. DetillionTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer -3-
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** April 29, 2013
N o s . 04

- 13

- 00222

- CR , 04

- 13

- 00223

- CR, 04

- 13

- 00224

- CR, 04

- 13

- 00225

- CR
Francisco R. HERNANDEZ , Appellant

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No s . 2010CR0819 , 2011CR2469, 2012CR2586, 2012CR3718A Honorable Philip A . Kazen, Jr., Judge Presiding


### ORDER
The trial court’s certification in each of these appeal s states that “this criminal case is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” The clerk’s record filed in each of these appeals contains a written plea bargain, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant; therefore, the trial court’s certification s accurately reflect that the criminal case s are plea

- bargain case s
. S ee T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 25.2(a)(2). Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides, “The appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has a right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 25.2(d). It is therefore ORDERED that th e s e appeal s will be dismissed pursuant to rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure unless appellant causes amended trial court certification s to be filed by May 22, 2013 , showing appellant h as the right of appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 25.2(d); 37.1; see also Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); Daniels v. State ,110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2003, no pet.). All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending our reso lution of the certification issue.

_________________________________ Catherine Stone, Chief JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 29th day of April, 2013

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1959

STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

CHIJIOKE AKAMIRO, Default Noted 3/21/2013,

Defendant – Appellant,

and

FREDERICK STARKES, Default Noted 3/21/2013,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District 

Judge. (2:13-cv-00055-MSD-DEM)

Submitted: December 20, 2013 Decided: January 8, 2014

Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Chijioke Akamiro, Appellant Pro Se. Theodore Ira Brenner, 

BRENNER, EVANS & MILLMAN, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Chijioke Akamiro appeals the district court’s order 

granting State Farm Fire and Casualty Company’s unopposed motion 

under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55 for a default judgment in this action 

for a declaratory judgment. We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. State Farm Fire and Cas. 

Co. v. Akamiro, No. 2:13-cv-00055-MSD-DEM (E.D. Va. July 19, 

2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED