alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2
 EverQ GmbH, Thalheim
 German GAAP Income Statement
for the period from December 20, 2006 to December 31, 2006
 December 20 toDecember 31,20061. Revenues
    
    
    3,676,877.802. Inventory change in unfinished and finished goods
    
    
    -288,881.973. Capitalized own work
    
    
    1,928.404. Other operating income
    
    
    170,874.755. Expenditure for materialsa) Expenditure for raw materials, consumables and supplies
    
    
    1,332,487.34b) Expenditure for purchased services
    
    
    184,749.621,517,236.966. Payroll expensesa) Salaries and wages
    
    
    351,341.85b) Social security
    
    
    67,805.77419,147.627. Depreciation and amortization of intangible fixed assets
and property, plant and equipment
    
    
    231,764.358. Other operating expenses
    
    
    172,391.049. Other interest and similiar income
    
    
    85,962.6410. Interest and similiar expenses
    
    
    115,884.44(thereof due
to shareholder  81,156.47)11. Net income
    
    
    1,190,337.21
Editorial Note on Part 73
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 73 appear at 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001.

§ 73.3110 Chlorophyllin-copper complex, oil soluble. ( a ) *Identity.* The color additve is chlorophyllin-copper complex, oil soluble. The chlorophyllin is obtained by extraction from a mixture of fescue and rye grasses. The chlorophyll is acid-treated to remove chelated magnesium which is replaced with hydrogen, which is turn is replaced with copper. This mixture is diluted to a 5 percent concentration with a mixture of palm oil, peanut oil, and hydrogenated peanut oil.
( b ) *Specifications.* The color additive chlorophyllin-copper complex, oil soluble (5 percent in palm oil, peanut oil, and hydrogenated peanut oil), shall conform to the following specifications and shall be free from impurities other than those named to the extent that such other impurities may be avoided by current good manufacturing practice: Moisture, not more than 0.5 percent. Nitrogen, not less than 0.2 percent and not more than 0.3 percent. Total copper, not less than 0.2 percent and not more than 0.4 percent. Free copper, not more than 200 parts per million. Lead, not more than 20 parts per million. Arsenic, not more than 5 parts per million. Sulfated ash, not more than 2.5 percent. Total color, not less than 4.5 percent and not more than 5.5 percent.
( c ) *Uses and restrictions.* ( 1 ) The color additive chlorophyllin-copper complex, oil soluble (5 percent in palm oil, peanut oil, and hydrogenated peanut oil), may be safely used to color polymethylmethacrylate bone cement. Chlorophyllin-copper complex may be used at levels that do not exceed 0.003 percent by weight of the bone cement.
( 2 ) Authorization for this use shall not be construed as waiving any of the requirements of sections 510(k), 515, and 520(g) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act with respect to the polymethylmethacrylate bone cement in which chlorophyllin-copper complex, oil soluble, is used.
( d ) *Labeling.* The label of the color additive shall conform to the requirements of § 70.25 of this chapter.
( e ) *Exemption from certification.* Certification of this color additive is not necessary for the protection of the public health, and therefore the color additive is exempt from the certification requirements of section 721(c) of the act.
[48 FR 56370, Dec. 21, 1983]
EXHIBIT 12

                                 PSEG POWER LLC
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                                                  -------------------
                                                  For the Nine Months
                                                  Ended September 30,
                                                  -------------------
                                                   2002         2001
                                                   ----         ----

Earnings as Defined in Regulation S-K (A):

Pre-tax Income from Continuing Operations          $551         $491
Fixed Charges                                       161          164
Capitalized Interest                                (69)         (44)
                                                   ----         ----
Earnings                                           $643         $611
                                                   ====         ====

Fixed Charges as Defined in
Regulation S-K (B):

Interest Expense                                   $159         $159
Interest Factor in Rentals                            2            5
                                                   ----         ----
Total Fixed Charges                                $161         $164
                                                   ====         ====

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                 3.99         3.73
                                                   ====         ====

(A)   The term  "earnings"  shall be defined as pretax  income  from  continuing
      operations.  Add to pretax income the amount of fixed charges  adjusted to
      exclude the amount of any interest capitalized during the period.

(B)   Fixed Charges represent (a) interest, whether expensed or capitalized, (b)
      amortization of debt discount,  premium and expense and (c) an estimate of
      interest implicit in rentals.
EXHIBIT 32.1







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of Southwall Technologies Inc.(the "Company"), for the quarter
ended September 28, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas G. Hood, the Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.







| | November 19, 2003 | By: | /s/ Thomas G. Hood                       
| | ----------------- | --- | -----------------------------------------
| |                   |     | Thomas G. Hood
   Chief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

In accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K, this certification is being
"furnished" as Exhibit 32.1 to the Company's quarterly report and
shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") or otherwise
subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated
by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act,
except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing.

---
38889.

#### KING SALES COMPANY, INC. v. PARKER.

Decided September 5, 1961.

*Bruce B. Edwards,*for plaintiff in error.

*Edward J. Henning,*contra.

Nichols, Judge.

The petition in the instant case, like those in the cases of *King Sales Co. v. McKey,*104 Ga. App. 63 (121 SE2d 48), and *King Sales Co. v. Childs,*104 Ga. App. 71 (121 SE2d 54), fails to allege a timely tender upon the discovery of the alleged fraud. Accordingly, the judgment overruling the defendant’s general demurrer must be reversed.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Carlisle, P. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.*
Exhibit 32.2

# CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

I, Gregory A. Wells, certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

To the best of my knowledge and
belief, the quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on November 13, 2003, by NTS-Properties VII, Ltd. (the Periodic
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
NTS-Properties VII, Ltd.

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to NTS-Properties VII, Ltd. and will
be retained by NTS-Properties VII, Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ Gregory A. Wells

---

Chief Financial Officer of NTS
Capital Corporation, 
General Partner of NTS-Properties Associates VII,
General Partner of NTS-Properties VII, Ltd.

---
Editorial Note on Part 868
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 868 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 868.5690 Incentive spirometer. ( a ) *Identification.* An incentive spirometer is a device that indicates a patient's breathing volume or flow and that provides an incentive to the patient to improve his or her ventilation.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).
Editorial Note on Part 872
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 872 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 872.4600 Intraoral ligature and wire lock. ( a ) *Identification.* An intraoral ligature and wire lock is a metal device intended to constrict fractured bone segments in the oral cavity. The bone segments are stabilized by wrapping the ligature (wire) around the fractured bone segments and locking the ends together.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II.
kop-ex10114_657.htm



AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO EMPLOYMENT LETTER AGREEMENT

 

THIS AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO EMPLOYMENT LETTER AGREEMENT (“Amendment”) is made and entered into as of May 5, 2017 by and among Koppers Performance Chemicals Inc. (f/k/a Osmose, Inc.) (the “Company”) and Stephen C. Reeder (“Employee”).

 

The Company and Employee are parties to an Employment Letter Agreement, dated as of March 14, 2012 (the “Original Agreement”), as amended by that certain Amendment to Employment Letter Agreement, dated as of June 25, 2014 (the “First Amendment” and, together with the Original Agreement, the “Employment Agreement”).

 

Effective on and as of the date hereof, the parties have agreed to amend the Employment Agreement on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth below.

 

For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties, intending to be legally bound, agree as follows:

 


	
1.
	
The Employment Agreement will be amended by:




 


	
 
	
a.
	
Deleting subsection (E) in the paragraph entitled “Termination” on page three of the Original Agreement in its entirety.




 


	
 
	
b.
	
Deleting the phrase “(the foregoing subsections (B), (C), (D) and (E) collectively referred to herein as the “Severance Payments”)” in lines 21 and 22 in the paragraph entitled “Termination” on page three of the Original Agreement and replacing it with the phrase “(the foregoing subsections (B), (C) and (D) collectively referred to herein as the “Severance Payments”)”.




 


	
 
	
c.
	
Deleting Section 2(h) of the First Amendment in its entirety and replacing it with “RESERVED.”




 


	
2.
	
Except as expressly amended by this Amendment, the Employment Agreement, and all of the terms and conditions thereof, will remain in full force and effect.




 


	
3.
	
Each party agrees, on written request of the other party, to do all acts and execute, deliver and perform all additional documents, instruments and agreements that may be reasonably required by the requesting party to implement the provisions and purposes of this Amendment.




 


	
4.
	
This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed to be an original copy of this Amendment, but all of which together will constitute one and the same Amendment.




 

[Signatures appear on following page]

 






IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above.  

 

 

KOPPERS PERFORMANCE CHEMICALS INC.

 

By _/s/ Steven R. Lacy__________

Name:  Steven R. Lacy

Title: Secretary

 

 

 

EMPLOYEE

 

_/s/ Stephen C. Reeder ______________

Stephen C. Reeder
§ 801.60 Principal display panel. The term *principal display panel,* as it applies to over-the-counter devices in package form and as used in this part, means the part of a label that is most likely to be displayed, presented, shown, or examined under customary conditions of display for retail sale. The principal display panel shall be large enough to accommodate all the mandatory label information required to be placed thereon by this part with clarity and conspicuousness and without obscuring designs, vignettes, or crowding. Where packages bear alternate principal display panels, information required to be placed on the principal display panel shall be duplicated on each principal display panel. For the purpose of obtaining uniform type size in declaring the quantity of contents for all packages of substantially the same size, the term *area of the principal display panel* means the area of the side or surface that bears the principal display panel, which area shall be: ( a ) In the case of a rectangular package where one entire side properly can be considered to be the principal display panel side, the product of the height times the width of that side;
( b ) In the case of a cylindrical or nearly cylindrical container, 40 percent of the product of the height of the container times the circumference; and
( c ) In the case of any other shape of container, 40 percent of the total surface of the container: *Provided, however,* That where such container presents an obvious “principal display panel” such as the top of a triangular or circular package, the area shall consist of the entire top surface.
In determining the area of the principal display panel, exclude tops, bottoms, flanges at the tops and bottoms of cans, and shoulders and necks of bottles or jars. In the case of cylindrical or nearly cylindrical containers, information required by this part to appear on the principal display panel shall appear within that 40 percent of the circumference which is most likely to be displayed, presented, shown, or examined under customary conditions of display for retail sale.
**EXHIBIT 4.9**
**Co-operation Agreement**
**(Translation)**     Party A : Kwan Hong Electronics Company Limited     Party B : Dongguan Hong Xin Electronics Company Limited
Throughout the years of co-operation since 1994, both parties have developed mutual trust in eachother in the areas of manufacturing productions and property premises. Now both parties afterdiscussion agree to continue the co-operations and to the followings:
 1. Party A is guaranteed to legally use the name of and act on behalf of Party B in variouslegal obligations, including taxation matters, administration management and financial systemetc.  2. Party B will not participate in the management of Party A and is not responsible for anyearnings or liabilities of Party A.  3. Party B will provide Party A conditions and convenience in carrying the above-mentionedmatters.  4. During the period where Party A uses the name of and acts on behalf of Party B, Party Bagrees that, Party B will not, without the approval of Party A, carry on business of samenature of Party A in the name of Party B.  5. Party A will pay co-operation fee of RMB120,000 per annum (ONE HUNDREAD TWENTY THOUSANDRENMINBI) to Party B.  6. This agreement is effective and valid until there is another agreement signed by both partiessuperseding this. Both parties agree to comprise and resolve any adequacy in this agreementon a friendly basis.   Party A: Kwan Hong Electronics Party B: Dongguan Hong Xin   Company Limited Electronics Company Limited   Legal representative: (Signed) Legal representative: (Signed)   Company chop Company chop   Date: July 1, 2004 Date: July 1, 2004
Editorial Note on Part 872
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 872 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 872.3730 Pantograph. ( a ) *Identification.* A pantograph is a device intended to be attached to a patient's head to duplicate lower jaw movements to aid in construction of restorative and prosthetic dental devices. A marking pen is attached to the lower jaw component of the device and, as the patient's mouth opens, the pen records on graph paper the angle between the upper and the lower jaw.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 872.9. If the device is not labeled or otherwise represented as sterile, it is exempt from the current good manufacturing practice requirements of the quality system regulation in part 820 of this chapter, with the exception of § 820.180, with respect to general requirements concerning records, and § 820.198, with respect to complaint files.
[52 FR 30097, Aug. 12, 1987, as amended at 66 FR 38798, July 25, 2001]
§ 74.1331 D&C Red No. 31. ( a ) *Identity.* ( 1 ) The color additive D&C Red No. 31 is principally the calcium salt of 3-hydroxy-4-(phenylazo)-2-naphthalenecarboxylic acid.
( 2 ) Color additive mixtures for drug use made with D&C Red No. 31 may contain only those diluents that are suitable and that are listed in part 73 of this chapter as safe for use in color additive mixtures for coloring externally applied drugs.
( b ) *Specifications.* D&C Red No. 31 shall conform to the following specifications and shall be free from impurities, other than those named, to the extent that such other impurities may be avoided by good manufacturing practice: Sum of volatile matter (at 135 °C) and chlorides and sulfates (calculated as sodium salts), not more than 10 percent. Aniline, not more than 0.2 percent. 3-Hydroxy-2-naphthoic acid, calcium salt, not more than 0.4 percent. Subsidiary colors, not more than 1 percent. Lead (as Pb), not more than 20 parts per million. Arsenic (as As), not more than 3 parts per million. Mercury (as Hg), not more than 1 part per million. Total color, not less than 90 percent.
( c ) *Uses and restrictions.* D&C Red No. 31 may be safely used in externally applied drugs in amounts consistent with good manufacturing practice.
( d ) *Labeling.* The label of the color additive and any mixtures prepared therefrom intended solely or in part for coloring purposes shall conform to the requirements of § 70.25 of this chapter.
( e ) *Certification.* All batches of D&C Red No. 31 shall be certified in accordance with regulations in part 80 of this chapter.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-2453

_____________________________

MYRON R. DAVIS,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Prohibition—Original Jurisdiction.

January 17, 2024

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. Sherrod v. Franza, 427 So. 2d 161, 164 (Fla. 1983);

Barstad v. State, 925 So. 2d 1135 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).

RAY, M.K. THOMAS, and NORDBY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Myron R. Davis, pro se, Petitioner.
2

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
# C_2017053EN.01002801.xml

| 20.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 53/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 53/28

---

Judgment of the General Court of 11 January 2017 — Topps Europe v Commission

(Case T-699/14) (1)

1

((Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Abuse of dominant position - Grant of licences in respect of intellectual-property rights for football-related collectibles - Decision rejecting a complaint - Access to the file - Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 - Manifest error of assessment - Relevant market - Exclusive licence - Single branding - Excessive prices))

(2017/C 053/34)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Topps Europe Ltd (Milton Keynes, United Kingdom) (represented initially by: R. Vidal, A. Penny, Solicitors, and B. Kennelly, QC, then by R. Subiotto, QC, and A. Cleenewerck de Crayencour, lawyer, and subsequently by T. de la Mare, QC)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Jimeno Fernández and M. Farley, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the defendant: Fédération internationale de football association (FIFA) (Zurich, Switzerland) (represented by: A. Barav and D. Reymond, lawyers) and Panini SpA (Modena, Italy) (represented by: F. Wijckmans, F. Tuytschaever and M. Varga, lawyers)

Interveners in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Decision C(2014) 5123 final of 15 July 2014 rejecting the complaint lodged by the applicant in Case AT.39899 — Licensing of intellectual-property rights for football collectibles.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Topps Europe Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission, Fédération internationale de football association (FIFA) and Panini Spa. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Topps Europe Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission, Fédération internationale de football association (FIFA) and Panini Spa.

---

(1)  OJ C 448, 15.12.2014.

1

---
|   | 1.               The quarterly report of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2.               The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:   May 13, 2011 | By:                           | /s/ Brandon Cade Thompson |
|-------------------------------------|-------------------------------|---------------------------|
|                                | Brandon Cade Thompson         |
|                                | Chief Executive Officer       |
|                                | (Principal Executive Officer) |
|                                |                          |
| Date:   May 13, 2011 | By:                           | /s/ Paul Williams         |
|                                | Paul Williams                 |
|                                | Chief Financial Officer       |
|                                | (Principal Financial Officer) |

----