alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FRONTIER
FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          51,693
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           5,300
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                18,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    107,896
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          27,849
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            28,502
<LOANS>                                      1,036,614
<ALLOWANCE>                                   (19,711)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,261,900
<DEPOSITS>                                     973,080
<SHORT-TERM>                                    61,569
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              9,992
<LONG-TERM>                                     75,195
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        91,263
<OTHER-SE>                                      50,801
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,261,900
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 68,571
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                7,493
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                76,064
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              26,049
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,741
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           46,274
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  (1,600)
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 20,193
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 29,090
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      29,090
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,144
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.09
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.76
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,997
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                18,098
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    (257)
<RECOVERIES>                                       270
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               19,711
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            19,711
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
#### Lauretta Iannotti *v.*The Grand Union Company

King, C. J., Alcorn, House, Cotter and Thim, Js.

Argued May 8

decided May 13, 1969

*Anthony J. Lasala,*for the appellant (plaintiff).

*Peter C. Dorsey,*for the appellee (defendant).

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff claimed error in the denial of her motion to set aside the verdict directed *615for the defendant. We have examined the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff and find no error. *Lombardi*v. *J. A. Bergren Dairy Farms, Inc.,*153 Conn. 19, 23, 213 A.2d 449.

There is no error.
Exhibit 10.1







DESCRIPTION OF 2016 CASH BONUS PLAN


On February 20, 2017, the Compensation Committee (the "Committee") of the Board of Directors of Covenant Transportation Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), approved performance-based bonus opportunities for the Company's senior management group (the "Program") under the Company's 2006 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended (the "Plan").  As set forth in the Plan, the Committee may choose from a range of defined performance measures.







Under the Program, and consistent with the objectives of the Plan, certain employees, including the Company's named executive officers, may receive bonuses upon satisfaction of fiscal 2017 consolidated earnings per share targets (and, for Sam Hough and Jim Brower, the satisfaction of fiscal 2017 operating income and operating ratio targets established for the Company's subsidiaries, Covenant Transport, Inc. ("CTI") and Star Transportation, Inc. ("Star"), respectively) (collectively, the "Performance Targets").  Each applicable Performance Target corresponds to a percentage bonus opportunity for the employee that is multiplied by the employee's 2017 year-end annualized salary to determine the employee's bonus.  Pursuant to the Program, in 2017 the Company's named executive officers are eligible to receive performance bonuses as follows: (i) David Parker may receive between 17.5% and 140.0% of his 2017 year-end annualized salary depending on the consolidated Performance Targets achieved, if any, (ii) Joey Hogan may receive between 16.25% and 130.0% of his 2017 year-end annualized salary depending on the consolidated Performance Targets achieved, if any, (iii) Richard Cribbs may receive between 12.5% and 100.0% of his 2017 year-end annualized salary depending on the consolidated Performance Targets achieved, if any, (iv) Sam Hough may receive between 3.75% and 30.0% of his 2017 year-end annualized salary depending on the consolidated Performance Targets achieved, if any, and between 8.75% and 70.0% of his 2017 year-end annualized salary depending on the Performance Targets achieved for CTI, if any, and (v) Jim Brower may receive between 3.75% and 30.0% of his 2017 year-end annualized salary depending on the consolidated Performance Targets achieved, if any, and between 8.75% and 70.0% of his 2017 year-end annualized salary depending on the Performance Targets achieved for Star, if any.  The performance bonuses based upon consolidated Performance Targets are subject to a 10.0% upward or downward adjustment depending upon year-over-year net income margin percent improvement/decline of the Company compared to five peer companies.


 


Back to Form 10-Q
# C_2016027EN.01004401.xml

| 25.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 27/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 27/44

---

Judgment of the General Court of 26 November 2015 — Nürburgring v OHIM — Biedermann (Nordschleife)

(Case T-181/14) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark Nordschleife - Earlier Community word mark Management by Nordschleife - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2016/C 027/53)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Nürburgring GmbH (Nürburg, Germany) (represented by: M. Viefhues and C. Giersdorf, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: M. Fischer, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Lutz Biedermann (Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 January 2014 (Case R 163/2013-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Mr Lutz Biedermann and Nürburgring GmbH.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Nürburgring GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Nürburgring GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 151, 19.5.2014.

1

---
Editorial Note on Part 868
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 868 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 868.1860 Peak-flow meter for spirometry. ( a ) *Identification.* A peak-flow meter for spirometry is a device used to measure a patient's maximum ventilatory flow rate.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).
§ 601.32 General factors relevant to safety and effectiveness. FDA's determination of the safety and effectiveness of a diagnostic radiopharmaceutical includes consideration of the following: ( a ) The proposed use of the diagnostic radiopharmaceutical in the practice of medicine;
( b ) The pharmacological and toxicological activity of the diagnostic radiopharmaceutical (including any carrier or ligand component of the diagnostic radiopharmaceutical); and
( c ) The estimated absorbed radiation dose of the diagnostic radiopharmaceutical.
EXHIBIT 32
----------




          CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
          --------------------------------------------------



     The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be
deemed filed pursuant to any provision of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 or any other securities law:

     Each of the undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on
Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of ARVIDA/JMB PARTNERS, L.P.




                                       /s/   Gary Nickele
                                       ------------------------------
                                       Gary Nickele
                                       Chief Executive Officer




                                       /s/   Gailen J. Hull
                                       ------------------------------
                                       Gailen J. Hull
                                       Chief Financial Officer and
                                       Principal Accounting Officer
# C_2016118EN.01003001.xml

| 4.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/30

---

Judgment of the General Court of 23 February 2016 — Consolidated Artists v OHIM — Body Cosmetics International (MANGO)

Consolidated Artists

OHIM

Body Cosmetics International (MANGO)

(Case T-761/14) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community figurative mark MANGO - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character acquired through use - Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 52(2) of Regulation No 207/2009))

(2016/C 118/33)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Consolidated Artists BV (Amstelveen, Netherlands) (represented by: B. Corne, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Pétrequin and A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Body Cosmetics International GmbH (Willich, Germany) (represented by: M. Müller-Mergenthaler, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 September 2014 (Case R 2337/2013-4), relating to invalidity proceedings between Body Cosmetics International GmbH and Consolidated Artists BV.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Consolidated Artists BV to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Consolidated Artists BV to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 7, 12.1.2015.

1

---
§ 582.3189 Calcium ascorbate. ( a ) *Product.* Calcium ascorbate.
( b ) *Conditions of use.* This substance is generally recognized as safe when used in accordance with good manufacturing or feeding practice.
# EPA Registration Jacket 2749-541______________________________________________________________

Page _ is not included in this copy.

Pages 107 through 108 are not included in this copy.

_______________________________________________________________

The material not included contains the following type of

information:

_____ Identity of product inert ingredients.

_____ Identity of product impurities.

_____ Description of the product manufacturing process.

_____ Description of quality control procedures.

_____ Identity of the source of product ingredients.

_____ Sales or other commercial/financial information.

_____ A draft product label.

__X__ The product confidential statement of formula.

_____ Information about a pending registration action.

_____ FIFRA registration data.

_____ The document is a duplicate of page(s) _______.

_____ The document is not responsive to the request.

_____ Proprietary information pertaining to the chemical

composition of an inert ingredient provided by the source

of the ingredient.

_____ Attorney-Client Privilege.

_____ Claimed Confidential by submitter upon submission to the

Agency.

_____ Internal Deliberative Information.

* The information not included is generally considered confidential by product

registrants. If you have any questions, please contact the individual who

prepared the response to your request.

_________________________________________________________________
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-72,500]

                    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (“Act”), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on November 5, 2009, applicable to workers of Hardinge, Inc., including on-site leased workers from Manpower, Elmira, New York. The notice will be published in the                     **Federal Register**                     soon.                

At the request of the State Agency and company official, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged in activities related to the production machine tools and accessory products.

The company reports that on-site leased workers from Employment Solutions were employed on-site at the Elmira, New York location of Hardinge, Inc. The Department has determined that these workers were sufficiently under the control of the subject firm to be considered leased workers.

Based on these findings, the Department is amending this certification to include workers leased from Employment Solutions, working on-site at the Elmira, New York location of Hardinge, Inc.

The amended notice applicable to TA-W-72,500 is hereby issued as follows:

                        All workers of Hardinge, Inc., Elmira, New York including on-site leased workers from Manpower and Employment Solutions, who became totally or partially separated from                               ( print page 9439)                            employment on or after September 29, 2008, through November 5, 2011, and all workers in the group threatened with total or partial separation from employment on date of certification through two years from the date of certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.                    

Signed in Washington, DC, this 4th day of February, 2010.

Richard Church,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2010-4241 Filed 3-1-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Wage Chronology: International Paper Co., Multiple Mill Group, and the Paperworkers and the Electrical Workers (IBEW), 1937-79

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Wage Chronology: International Paper Co., Multiple Mill Group, and the Paperworkers and the Electrical Workers (IBEW), 1937-79 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 2023*,												Washington, D.C: 								The Bureau, 										September 1979,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4885,			accessed on September 26, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     Financial Data Sheet for Healthcare Properties, L.P.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000814458
<NAME>                        Healthcare Properties, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                 1
<CASH>                          11,627,412
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   1,343,665
<ALLOWANCES>                    (346,042)
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                0
<PP&E>                          34,123,002
<DEPRECIATION>                  (14,197,432)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  32,902,259
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           0
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        0
<OTHER-SE>                      25,877,055
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    32,902,259
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                6,878,592
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   5,488,705
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                78,750
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              481,250
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 829,887
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    829,887
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   0
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0
        


</TABLE>
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 5, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-13-00377-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF R.N.T. AND S.P.T., Children

On Appeal from the 313th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-03540J

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant, J.S.T., appeals a final decree terminating her parental rights to the 

children who are the subject of this suit. Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal. 

Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal 

is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders 

v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), presenting a professional 

evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be 

advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). The 
2

Anders procedures are applicable to an appeal from the termination of parental 

rights when an appointed attorney concludes that there are no non-frivolous issues 

to assert on appeal. In re D.E.S., 135 S.W.3d 326, 329 (Tex. App.CHouston [14th 

Dist.] 2004, no pet.). 

A copy of counsel’s brief and the record were delivered to appellant. 

Appellant was advised of her right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se 

response. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); In 

re D.E.S., 135 S.W.3d at 329-30. More than forty-five days have elapsed and as of 

this date, no pro se response has been filed.

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree the 

appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error 

in the record. A discussion of the brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence of 

the state.

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Brown, Christopher, and Donovan.
|                                      |
|--------------------------------------|
|                                      |  |
| Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas | BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware |
| As Indenture Trustee                 | As Owner Trustee |
| Attn:  Michelle H.Y. Voon  | Attn: Robert Castle / Kristine Gullo |
| 100 Plaza One 6th Floor         | 100 White Clay Center, Suite 102 |
| Jersey City, NY 07311                | Newark, DE  19711 |

|                                                 |
|-------------------------------------------------|
|                                                 |  |
| The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. | Ally Auto Assets LLC |
| Attn:  Robert Castle                  | Ally Financial Inc. |
| 2 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1020              | 500 Woodward Ave |
| Chicago, IL  60602                    | Mail code:  MI-01-20-TRES |
|                                            | Detroit, MI 48226 |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| Re:    | Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2015-1 |
|   | Annual Statement as to Compliance |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| a. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period of January 1, 2016 through   December 31, 2016, and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement has been made under his supervision, and |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| b. | To the best of his knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement throughout such period. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   | Very truly yours, |
|   |   |
|   | /s/ David J. DeBrunner |   |
|   | David J. DeBrunner |
|   | Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |
|   |   |