alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.5

             REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the board of directors
of EverQ GmbH, Thalheim (Germany)

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of EverQ GmbH, Thalheim
(Germany), as of December 31, 2006, and the related income statement, statement
of changes in equity and cash flow statement for the period from December 20 to
December 31, 2006, as well as the notes to these financial statements. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provide a reasonable
basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of EverQ GmbH, Thalheim (Germany),
at December 31, 2006, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for
the period from December 20 to December 31, 2006, in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in Germany.

Accounting principles generally accepted in Germany vary in certain significant
respects from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. Information relating to the nature and effect of such differences is
presented in Note 6 to the financial statements.

As discussed in the notes, the financial statements referred to above do not
constitute annual statutory financial statements of EverQ GmbH, Thalheim
(Germany), pursuant to German commercial law. Hence, these financial statements
do not present the results of the Company's operations and its cash flows for
the Company's fiscal year and do not include comparative financial information.

PricewaterhouseCoopers AG

Leipzig, Germany
February 27, 2007
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


              CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
on Forms S-8 pertaining to certain shares of KeraVision, Inc. common stock
issuable to the holders of Series B convertible preferred stock, the 1997
Employee Stock Option Plan, the 1995 Directors' Stock Option Plan, the 1995
Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the 1995 Stock Plan and the 1987 Stock Option Plan
of KeraVision, Inc. of our report dated February 4, 2000 (except for the third
paragraph of Note 1, as to which the date is October 10, 2000), with respect to
the consolidated financial statements and schedule of KeraVision, Inc. included
in the Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended December 31, 1999.


                                                /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


San Jose, California
October 10, 2000
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 130 (Thursday, July 7, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 39843]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-17219]

=======================================================================

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: United States Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATE AND TIME:  Friday, July 15, 2011; 9:30 a.m. EDT.

PLACE:  624 Ninth Street, NW., Room 540, Washington, DC 20425.

MEETING AGENDA

    This meeting is open to the public.

    I. Approval of Agenda.

    II. Approval of the June 10, 2011 Meeting Minutes.

    III. Program Planning:

     Consideration of enforcement report topic for FY 2012.

     Consideration of additional briefing topics for FY 2012.

     Inclusion of rebuttal to enforcement report for FY 2010.

     Approval of Age Discrimination briefing report.

    IV. Management and Operations:

     Staff Director's report.

     Discussion of the 2013 Budget.

    V. State Advisory Committee Issues:

     Discussion of Commissioner recommendations of SAC members.

     Re-chartering the New Hampshire SAC.

    VI. Adjourn.

CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting Chief, 

Public Affairs Unit (202) 376-8591.

    Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require 

the services of a sign language interpreter should contact Pamela 

Dunston at (202) 376-8105 or at signlanguage@usccr.gov at least three 

(3) business days before the scheduled date of the meeting.

    Dated: July 5, 2011.

Kimberly A. Tolhurst,

Senior Attorney-Advisor.

[FR Doc. 2011-17219 Filed 7-5-11; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
# C_2014361EN.01003102.xml

| 13.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 361/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 361/31

---

Action brought on 12 July 2014 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-64/14)

2014/C 361/47

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: M.-A. Lucas, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Civil service — Application for annulment of the Commission’s decision not to admit the applicant to the translation tests of EPSO competition AD/263/13 to establish a reserve recruitment list of Italian translators.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | annul the decision of 19/11/2013 not to admit the applicant to the translation tests; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of 19/11/2013 not to admit the applicant to the translation tests;

| — | if necessary, annul the decision of 2/4/2014 dismissing the applicant’s complaint; |
| --- | --- |

—

if necessary, annul the decision of 2/4/2014 dismissing the applicant’s complaint;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
#### § 607.39 Misbranding by reference to establishment registration, validation of registration, or to registration number.

Registration of an establishment, validation of registration, or assignment of a registration number does not in any way denote approval of the firm or its products nor does it mean that the products may be legally marketed. Any representation that creates an impression of official approval because of establishment registration, validation of registration, or possession of a registration number is misleading and constitutes misbranding.

[81 FR 60223, Aug. 31, 2016]
# C_2015155EN.01003903.xml

| 11.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/39

---

Order of the General Court of 16 March 2015 — Polyblend v Commission

(Case T-303/14) (1)

1

(2015/C 155/52)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 223, 14.7.2014.

1

---
39099.

#### STEPHENS, by Next Friend v. METCALF *et al.*

Townsend, Presiding Judge.

*Code*§ 67-1401 provides: “Whenever personal property shall be sold and delivered with the condition affixed to the sale that the title thereto is to remain in the vendor of such personal property until the purchase price thereof shall have been paid, every such conditional sale, in order for the reservation of title to be valid as against third parties, shall be evidenced in writing, and not otherwise.” The term “third parties” includes a judgment creditor of the conditional vendee who has caused a levy to be made against the property. *Harp v. Patapsco Guano Co.,*99 Ga. 752 (27 SE 181); *Maddox v. Stone,*96 Ga. App. 487 (100 SE2d 740). The automobile which was the subject of the claim in this claim case was not in the possession of the defendant in fi. fa. when the levy was made, and the burden was accordingly upon the plaintiff in fi. fa. to show a leviable interest. However, the undisputed evidence was to the effect that the claimant had sold the automobile to the defendant and delivered possession and evidence of title to ihim, receiving a check in payment, and orally reserved title in himself until the check cleared. The check did not clear and the vendor sought to assert title in himself by reason of this fact. As between the parties, his contention would have been sound, but as to a third party, the plaintiff in fi. fa., he was pre*693eluded from thus asserting title after the levy was made, for the reason that the reservation of title was not in writing.

Decided September 28, 1961

Rehearing denied October 23, 1961.

*Melvin Pazol, Charles W. Anderson, Thomas G. Myers,*for plaintiff in error.

*Fisher & Phillips, John C. Bracy,*contra.

The Judge of the Superior Court of DeKalb County erred in denying the .certiorari from the Civil and Criminal Court of DeKalb County complaining of the action of the trial judge in awarding the property to the claimant.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Frankum and Jordan, JJ., concur.*
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7682 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7682

  To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to increase under the 
   Medicaid program the minimum monthly personal needs allowance for 
   institutionalized individuals and couples, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 13, 2024

Ms. Wexton (for herself and Ms. Norton) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to increase under the 
   Medicaid program the minimum monthly personal needs allowance for 
   institutionalized individuals and couples, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Personal Needs Allowance 
Modernization Act'' or the ``PNA Modernization Act''.

SEC. 2. INCREASING UNDER THE MEDICAID PROGRAM THE MINIMUM MONTHLY 
              PERSONAL NEEDS ALLOWANCE FOR INSTITUTIONALIZED 
              INDIVIDUALS AND COUPLES.

    Section 1902(q)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1396a(q)(2)) is amended--
            (1) by inserting after ``$30'' the following: ``(or, 
        beginning January 1, 2025, $60)'';
            (2) by inserting after ``and $60'' the following: ``(or, 
        beginning January 1, 2025, $120)''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new sentence: 
        ``Whenever benefit amounts under title II of the Social 
        Security Act are increased by any percentage effective with a 
        month after November 2025 as a result of a determination made 
        under section 215(i) of such Act, each of the dollar amounts in 
        effect under the previous sentence for the month before such 
        month shall be increased by the same percentage.''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report dated April 5, 2002, (except with respect to the matter discussed in the
fourth and fifth paragraphs of Note 1, as to which the date is April 15, 2002),
and our report dated April 15, 2002, included in this Form 10-K, into the
Company's previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 File Nos.
33-98116, 333-09083, 333-09087, 333-30114, and 333-36890 and on Form S-3 File
Nos. 333-18313 and 333-49306.

                                                 [ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP signature]

Dallas, Texas
April 15, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           290,765
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                       6,220
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 297,086
<CASH>                                          45,851
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              12,610
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         130,779
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 519,738
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                174,457
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                  88,841
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 76,521
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           818
<OTHER-SE>                                     142,364
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   519,738
<PREMIUMS>                                     106,383
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              9,576
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               6,791
<OTHER-INCOME>                                     164
<BENEFITS>                                      72,376
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                   (20,309)
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            51,518
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,329
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,467
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,862
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,862
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.39
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7666 

To require the Secretary of Agriculture to develop a strategy to increase 

opportunities to utilize livestock grazing as a means of wildfire risk reduction. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 13, 2024 

Mr. LAMALFA (for himself and Mr. VASQUEZ) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to 

the Committee on Natural Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Agriculture to develop a strategy 

to increase opportunities to utilize livestock grazing as 

a means of wildfire risk reduction. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. UTILIZING GRAZING FOR WILDFIRE RISK RE4 DUCTION. 

5 The Secretary of Agriculture, acting through the 

6 Chief of the U.S. Forest Service, in coordination with 

7 holders of permits to graze livestock on Federal land, shall 

8 develop a strategy to increase opportunities to utilize liveVerDate Sep 11 2014 06:18 Mar 20, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H7666.IH H7666

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 7666 IH

1 stock grazing as wildfire risk reduction strategy, includ2 ing— 

3 (1) completion of reviews (as required under the 

4 National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (U.S.C. 

5 4321 et seq.)) to allow permitted grazing on vacant 

6 grazing allotments during instances of drought, wild7 fire or other natural disasters that disrupt grazing 

8 on allotments already permitted; 

9 (2) use of targeted grazing; 

10 (3) increase use of temporary permits to pro11 mote targeted fuels reduction and reduction of 

12 invasive annual grasses; 

13 (4) increased use of grazing as a postfire recov14 ery and restoration strategy, where appropriate; and 

15 (5) use all applicable authorities under the law. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
# C_2016048EN.01009401.xml

| 8.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 48/94 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/94

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Single Judge) of 17 December 2015 — T v Commission

(Case F-134/14) (1)

1

((Civil service - Social security - Occupational disease - Article 73 of the Staff Regulations - Application for recognition of the occupational origin of a disease - Causation - Claim for damages for the non-material harm suffered as a result of the delay taken by the institution to acknowledge the occupational origin of the sickness - Obligation to adjudicate within a reasonable time - Non-material damage))

(2016/C 048/106)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: T (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Tymen, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by J. Currall and C. Ehrbar, acting as Agents, and subsequently by C. Ehrbar, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

The application to annul the Commission’s decision to exclude the existence of harm arising from the delay taken by the Commission to establish the occupational origin of the applicant’s sickness and to pay her the amount of EUR 2 000 only as compensation for the uncertainty as regards recognition of the occupational origin of her illness and the claim for damages for the non-material harm allegedly suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Orders the European Commission to pay T the amount of EUR 5 000; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Orders the European Commission to pay T the amount of EUR 5 000;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder.

| 3. | Declares that the European Commission is to bear its own costs and orders it to pay the costs incurred T. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Declares that the European Commission is to bear its own costs and orders it to pay the costs incurred T.

---

(1)  OJ C 34, 2/2/2015, p. 53.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.2
 
 
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Form 10-Q”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 of Crimson Exploration Inc. (the “Issuer”).  The undersigned hereby certifies that the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
 
 Date:
August 5, 2010/s/ E. Joseph GradyName:
E. Joseph GradyTitle:
Senior Vice PresidentChief Financial Officer
 
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Issuer and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission, or its staff, upon request.
#### Arthur *et al. v.*Brawner *et al.*

No. 8452.

February 19, 1932.

Russell, C. J.

1. Erom the allegations of the petition in this case it appears that the plaintiffs chose to rely upon the representations made by the defendants respecting the terms of the leases and the terms of payment of the rental on the property leased. It is alleged in general terms that these representations were false and fraudulent, and that the plaintiffs were injured by relying and acting upon the same. The petition is defective in that the facts alleged are insufficient to charge actual fraud, as ruled in *Emlen*v. Roper, 133 *Ga.*726 (66 S. E. 934), and *Mangham*v. *Cobb,*160 *Ga.*182 (127 S. E. 408), and that it does not disclose any emergency or condition authorizing the plaintiffs to rely upon these false representations without themselves examining the leases purchased. If they had an opportunity to do so (and the petition fails to allege the contrary) and failed to avail themselves thereof, they are not entitled to complain of the deception which they allege was practiced upon them. Their allegations do not show either that they had no such opportunity, or that they were prevented by the fraud or deceit of the defendants from examining the leases purchased from the defendants. *Castleberry*v. *Scandrett,*20 *Ga.*242; *Allen*v. *Gibson, S3 Ga.*600; *Falkner*v. *Lane,*58 *Ga.*116; *Baldwin*v. *Daniel,*69 *Ga.*783 (6 *a); Martin*v. *Harwell,*115 *Ga.*156 (3) (41 S. E. 686); H*ayslip*v. *Fields,*142 *Ga.*49 (82 S. E. 441).

2. The court did not err in sustaining a general demurrer to the petition.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*481
      *Erie M. Donalson,*for plaintiffs. *W. H. Burt,*for defendants.