alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016156EN.01003701.xml

| 2.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/37

---

Judgment of the General Court of 17 March 2016 — Vanhalewyn v EEAS

(Case T-792/14 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Civil Service - Officials - Remuneration - EEAS staff posted to a third country - Withdrawal of the allowance for living conditions of staff posted to Mauritius - Failure to adopt the GIP for Article 10 of Annex X to the Staff Regulations))

(2016/C 156/48)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Eric Vanhalewyn (Grand-Baie, Mauritius) (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European External Action Service (EEAS) (represented by: S. Marquardt and M. Silva, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Third Chamber) of 25 September 2014 in Osorio and Others v EEAS (F-101/13, ECR-SC, EU:F:2014:223), seeking to have that judgment set aside.

Osorio and Others

EEAS

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Third Chamber) of 25 September 2014 in Osorio and Others v EEAS (F-101/13) in so far as it dismisses the action brought by Mr Eric Vanhalewyn; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Third Chamber) of 25 September 2014 in Osorio and Others v EEAS (F-101/13) in so far as it dismisses the action brought by Mr Eric Vanhalewyn;

| 2. | Annuls the decision of the Chief Operating Officer of the European External Action Service (EEAS) of 19 December 2012 revising the amount of the allowance for living conditions (ALC) granted to staff posted in a third country in so far as that decision withdraws the ALC laid down in Article 10 of Annex X to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union for officials and other servants posted to Mauritius; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Annuls the decision of the Chief Operating Officer of the European External Action Service (EEAS) of 19 December 2012 revising the amount of the allowance for living conditions (ALC) granted to staff posted in a third country in so far as that decision withdraws the ALC laid down in Article 10 of Annex X to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union for officials and other servants posted to Mauritius;

| 3. | Orders the EEAS to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the EEAS to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 46, 9.2.2015.

1

---
#### § 7.1 Scope.

This part governs the practices and procedures applicable to regulatory enforcement actions initiated by the Food and Drug Administration pursuant to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 301 *et seq.*) and other laws that it administers. This part also provides guidance for manufacturers and distributors to follow with respect to their voluntary removal or correction of marketed violative products. This part is promulgated to clarify and explain the regulatory practices and procedures of the Food and Drug Administration, enhance public understanding, improve consumer protection, and assure uniform and consistent application of practices and procedures throughout the agency.

[43 FR 26218, June 16, 1978, as amended at 65 FR 56476, Sept. 19, 2000]
§ 582.6801 Sodium tartrate. ( a ) *Product.* Sodium tartrate.
( b ) *Conditions of use.* This substance is generally recognized as safe when used in accordance with good manufacturing or feeding practice.
Abatement Order filed November 26, 2013. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-00973-CR

____________

MIGUEL ANGEL CONTRERAS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 182nd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 0850245

ABATEMENT ORDER

This is an appeal from a judgment signed September 18, 2013, adjudicating 

appellant’s guilt for aggravated assault causing serious bodily injury. According to 

information provided to this court, appellant is not represented by counsel. The 

record reflects that appellant claimed indigence and requested appointment of 

appellate counsel when he filed his notice of appeal. To date, this court has not 

been advised that counsel has been appointed. Accordingly, we issue the following 

order:
2

We ORDER the judge of the 182nd District Court to immediately conduct a 

hearing at which appellant, appellant’s counsel, if any, and counsel for the State 

shall participate, either in person or by video teleconference, to determine whether 

appellant desires to prosecute his appeal, and, if so, whether appellant is indigent 

and, thus entitled to a free record and appointed counsel on appeal. The judge shall

appoint appellate counsel for appellant if necessary. The judge shall see that a 

record of the hearing is made, shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law or 

order the appointment of cousnel, and shall order the trial clerk to forward a record 

of the hearing and a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings and

conclusions or order appointing counsel. The transcribed record of the hearing and 

supplemental clerk’s record shall be filed with the clerk of this court on or before

December 23, 2013.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s 

active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court=s active docket when the 

supplemental record is filed in this court. The court will also consider an 

appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the court may 

reinstate the appeal on its own motion. It is the responsibility of any party seeking 

reinstatement to request a hearing date from the trial court and to schedule a 

hearing in compliance with this court’s order. If the parties do not request a 

hearing, the court coordinator of the trial court shall set a hearing date and notify 

the parties of such date.

PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CEC Entertainment, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 1, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Richard M. FrankRichard M. FrankChief Executive OfficerApril 23, 2007


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to CEC
Entertainment, Inc. and will be retained by CEC Entertainment, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



28
SPENCER CLEMONS,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 17

- 017 8

Opinion filed February 6, 2017.

Amended Petition for Writ of Prohibition

-- Original Jurisdiction

.

Anabelle Dias of Anabelle Dias P.A., Tallahassee , for Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Responde nt.

PER CURIAM.

The amended petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits

.

LEWIS, BILBREY, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.
§ 830.340 Voluntary submission of ancillary device identification information. ( a ) You may not submit any information to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) other than that specified by § 830.310, except where FDA acts to permit the submission of specified additional types of information, termed ancillary information.
( b ) FDA will provide information through the FDA Web site at *http://www.fda.gov/udi/* concerning the types of ancillary information that may be submitted to the GUDID.
( c ) FDA may periodically change the types of ancillary information that may be submitted to the GUDID. We will announce any change on the FDA Web site at *http://www.fda.gov/udi/* at least 60 days before making the change.
# C_2015371EN.01002401.xml

| 9.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 371/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 371/24

---

Judgment of the General Court of 18 September 2015 — Federación Nacional de Cafeteros de Colombia v OHIM — Accelerate (COLOMBIANO COFFEE HOUSE)

(Case T-359/14) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community figurative mark COLOMBIANO COFFEE HOUSE - Earlier protected geographical indication Café de Colombia - Articles 13 and 14 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2015/C 371/27)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Federación Nacional de Cafeteros de Colombia (Bogota, Colombia) (represented by: A. Pomares Caballero and M. Pomares Caballero, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: Ó. Mondéjar Ortuño, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Accelerate s.a.l. (Beirut, Lebanon)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 27 March 2014 (Case R 1200/2013-5) relating to invalidity proceedings between the Federación Nacional de Cafeteros de Colombia and Accelerate s.a.l.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 27 March 2014 (Case R 1200/2013-5) in so far as it rejected the application for a declaration of invalidity; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 27 March 2014 (Case R 1200/2013-5) in so far as it rejected the application for a declaration of invalidity;

| 2. | Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Federación Nacional de Cafeteros de Colombia. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Federación Nacional de Cafeteros de Colombia.

---

(1)  OJ C 253, 4.8.2014.

1

---
# C_2016232EN.01000902.xml

| 27.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 232/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 232/9

---

Judgment of the General Court 12 May 2016 — Italy v Commission

(Case T-384/14) (1)

1

((EAGGF - Guarantee Section - EAGF and EAFRD - Expenditure excluded from financing - Cattle and sheep sectors - Flat-rate financial correction - One-off correction - Articles 48 and 69 of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 - Special entitlements - Obligation to state reasons))

(2016/C 232/11)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri and B. Tidore, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Rossi and D. Bianchi, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for partial annulment of Commission Implementing Decision 2014/191/EU of 4 April 2014 on excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2014 L 104, p. 43), in so far as it excludes certain expenditure incurred by the Italian Republic.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 235, 21.7.2014.

1

---
### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORTHE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
LARRY KLAYMAN, Plaintiff,


### v. HONORABLE COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, etal. 

### Defendants. ) ) ) ) 

### ) Civil Case No. 11-1775 (RJL) ) ) ) ) )


### ORDERAND FINAL JUDGMENT Forthe reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered this date, it is this 

# 41--- 

# 2 .S. day ofSeptember, 2012, hereby 

### ORDERED that the defendants' Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. #11] is 

### GRANTED; it is further 

### ORDERED that plaintiffs Motion to Change Venue [Dkt. 

### #6] is 

### DENIED AS MOOT; and it is further 

### ORDERED that finaljudgmentbe entered in this case for the defendants. 

### SO ORDERED.

United States District Judge 1
Exhibit 99

**Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to****18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asAdopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Prandium, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly periodended September 29, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Kevin S. Relyea, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Robert T. Trebing, Jr., as Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

|  
 
(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 
 
 
 
 
 
(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ KEVIN S. RELYEA

 
 
 
Name:

**Kevin S. Relyea**

 
Title:

**Chief Executive Officer**

 
Date: 

**November 13, 2002**

 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ ROBERT T. TREBING, JR.

 
 
 
Name:  

**Robert T. Trebing, Jr.**

 
Title: 

**Chief Financial Officer**

 
Date: 

**November 13, 2002**

 
This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Editorial Note on Part 868
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 868 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 868.1030 Manual algesimeter. ( a ) *Identification.* A manual algesimeter is a mechanical device intended to determine a patient's sensitivity to pain after administration of an anesthetic agent, e.g., by pricking with a sharp point.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 868.9. The device is also exempt from the current good manufacturing practice requirements of the quality system regulation in part 820 of this chapter, with the exception of § 820.180, with respect to general requirements concerning records, and § 820.198, with respect to complaint files.
[54 FR 25048, June 12, 1989, as amended at 66 FR 38793, July 25, 2001]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk December 5, 2012

h1128 

# Order

December 5, 2012

144316 & (55)

_______________________________________

In Re Conservatorship of DEANNA

THERESA CISNEROS.

_______________________________________

MARK A. FULLMER, Successor Conservator

of DEANNA THERESA CISNEROS, a

Protected Person,

Petitioner

- Appellee,

v SC: 144316

COA: 298922

St. Clair Probate Court:

AUTO CLUB INSURANCE ASSOCIATION, 07

- 110072

- CA

Respondent

- Appellant.

_______________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for leave to file statement of supplemental

authority is GRANTED. By order of April 18 , 2012, the application for leave to appeal

the September 27, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending

the decisions in Johnson v Recca (Docket No. 143088) and Douglas v Allstate Ins Co

(Docket No. 143503). The cases having been decided on July 30, 2012, 492 Mich 169

(2012), and 492 Mich 241 (2012), the application is again considered and, pursuant to

MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the judgment of the

Court of Appeals and REMAND this case to the Co urt of Appeals for reconsideration in

light of our decisions in Johnson and Douglas

.
§ 803.50 If I am a manufacturer, what reporting requirements apply to me? ( a ) If you are a manufacturer, you must report to us the information required by § 803.52 in accordance with the requirements of § 803.12(a), no later than 30 calendar days after the day that you receive or otherwise become aware of information, from any source, that reasonably suggests that a device that you market: ( 1 ) May have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury or
( 2 ) Has malfunctioned and this device or a similar device that you market would be likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury, if the malfunction were to recur.
( b ) What information does FDA consider “reasonably known” to me? ( 1 ) You must submit all information required in this subpart E that is reasonably known to you. We consider the following information to be reasonably known to you: ( i ) Any information that you can obtain by contacting a user facility, importer, or other initial reporter;
( ii ) Any information in your possession; or
( iii ) Any information that you can obtain by analysis, testing, or other evaluation of the device.
( 2 ) You are responsible for obtaining and submitting to us information that is incomplete or missing from reports submitted by user facilities, importers, and other initial reporters.
( 3 ) You are also responsible for conducting an investigation of each event and evaluating the cause of the event. If you cannot submit complete information on a report, you must provide a statement explaining why this information was incomplete and the steps you took to obtain the information. If you later obtain any required information that was not available at the time you filed your initial report, you must submit this information in a supplemental report under § 803.56 in accordance with the requirements of § 803.12(a).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE ANNUAL
REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             912
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,438
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 5,900
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     36,384
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          18,123
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            17,889
<LOANS>                                         55,770
<ALLOWANCE>                                        660
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 121,841
<DEPOSITS>                                      98,327
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,286
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            16
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,212
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 121,841
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  4,721
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,513
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   357
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 8,591
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,094
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,106
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,485
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       69
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  23
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,387
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,181
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,181
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       855
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.59
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.98
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,478
<LOANS-PAST>                                       180
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   654
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       63
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  660
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               660
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>