alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2/15/2011 16:27 FAX 20249351(12 FAA - DMS 001/001 

AMD SDPPLT OO^ IN a 

Federal Aviation Administration 

600 Independence Ave. S-W. 

Wilbur Wright Buildinf,, Suite 2W100U 

Wasliinjjton DC 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Df^-eniber2, 2U11 

^^^ 

fZD 

n-i 

j^TM— \ 

O"! 

^_^ 

u 

"fT 

rsj) 

.-O 

V. ?•" -

V-" •.' p: ' ••-r' 

fV:-£;-^ 

rn^^CJpp. 

•3II:r^^v 

'-^:^~\ —1= ! ' 

•CO 

To Wliom ft May Com-t^rn. £A^ - -^Oli" IZ Q\ 

I wuuld like to Ti^qveM a hearing on case number 2U10VVP700126. 

HiankyOiJ, 

Chriii Deralas 

President 

Weslesco 

14802 YORBA COURT. CHINO. CA 91710 • (909)393-4880 • FAX(909)393-6747 

WESTESC01@CS.COM
Editorial Note on Part 864
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 864 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 864.5200 Automated cell counter. ( a ) *Identification.* An automated cell counter is a fully-automated or semi-automated device used to count red blood cells, white blood cells, or blood platelets using a sample of the patient's peripheral blood (blood circulating in one of the body's extremities, such as the arm). These devices may also measure hemoglobin or hematocrit and may also calculate or measure one or more of the red cell indices (the erythrocyte mean corpuscular volume, the mean corpuscular hemoglobin, or the mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration). These devices may use either an electronic particle counting method or an optical counting method.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).
[45 FR 60593, Sept. 12, 1980]
# C_2015311EN.01004502.xml

| 21.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/45

---

Order of the General Court of 24 June 2015 — Wm. Wrigley Jr. v OHIM (Extra)

(Case T-552/14) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Application for Community figurative mark Extra - Absolute grounds for refusal - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2015/C 311/49)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Wm. Wrigley Jr. Company (Wilmington, Delaware, United States) (represented by: M. Kinkeldey, S. Brandstätter and C. Schmitt, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 May 2014 (Case R 199/2014-5) relating to an application for registration of the figurative sign Extra as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Wm. Wrigley Jr. Company shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Wm. Wrigley Jr. Company shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 351, 6.10.2014.

1

---
<PAGE>   1

                               AMENDMENT NO. 7 TO
                  PCS 1900 PROJECT AND SUPPLY AGREEMENT BETWEEN
                        VOICESTREAM WIRELESS CORPORATION
                                       AND
                              NORTHERN TELECOM INC.

                             SERVICEBUILDER PRODUCTS


THIS AMENDMENT No. 7 is entered into as of the last date signed by either party
shown below by and between VOICESTREAM WIRELESS CORPORATION (hereinafter
referred to as "Buyer"), a Washington corporation with offices located at 3650
131st Avenue, Bellevue S.E., Washington 98006 and NORTHERN TELECOM INC., a
Delaware corporation with offices located at 2221 Lakeside Boulevard,
Richardson, Texas 75082 (hereinafter referred to as "Seller" or "Nortel").

WHEREAS, Buyer and Seller are Parties to the PCS 1900 Project and Supply
Agreement dated as of June 30, 1995, as amended (the "Supply Agreement"), and
desire to amend the Supply Agreement to provide specific terms applicable to the
sale of ServiceBuilder Products, Services and/or the license of software as
contained herein.

NOW, THEREFORE Buyer and Seller agree as follows:

1. Add a new Annex 14, "ServiceBuilder Products and Services" as attached
hereto.

2. Except as specifically modified herein, the Supply Agreement shall in all
respects continue in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 7 to be
effective on the day last written below.

NORTHERN TELECOM INC.                       VOICESTREAM WIRELESS CORPORATION
A DELAWARE CORPORATION                      A WASHINGTON CORPORATION


By: /s/  Douglas Patterson                By:  /s/ Bob Stapleton
   -------------------------------           -----------------------------------
           (Signature)                                (Signature)

Name:    Douglas Patterson                Name:    Bob Stapleton
   -------------------------------           -----------------------------------
             (Print)                                    (Print)

Title:    VP Finance                      Title:   President
   -------------------------------           -----------------------------------

Date:     May 14, 1999                    Date:    April 20, 1999
   -------------------------------           -----------------------------------
### NUMBER 13

- 1 5

- 00 5 13

- C R



### COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

KEVIN LOZANO A/K/A

KEVIN LOZAWO

, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On a ppeal from the 3 57 th District Court

of Cameron County, Texas.



## ORDER

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Longoria and Hinojosa

Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on the record and appellant’s brief. Appellant’s

brief was filed on April 5, 2018. The State has not filed a brief. The Court, having fully

examined the record and appellant’s brief hereby ORDERS the State to file its brie f with

this Court on or before November 26, 2018

. Further motions for extension of time will2 not be favorably entertained by the Court.

The State’s first motion for extension of time to file its appellate response brief is

DISMI SSED AS MOOT.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

23r d day of October, 2018.
**Exhibit 99.4**

 
|  | • | Ernst &  Young LLP  220 South Sixth Street, Ste 1400  Minneapolis, MN 55402-4509 | • | Phone: (612)  343-1000  www.ey.com |
|--|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------|

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

Target National Bank

Its Officers and Directors

As Servicer

 

We have examined management’sassertion in the accompanying report, Report of Management on Compliance, datedFebruary 15, 2006, that Target National Bank (the Bank), as Servicer, compliedin all material respects with the administration and servicing requirements ofArticle III, Article IV, and Section 8.8 of the Amended and Restated Poolingand Servicing Agreement, dated April 28, 2000, and the applicable provisions ofthe Series 2002-1 Supplement, dated July 2, 2002, and the Series 2005-1Supplement, dated November 9, 2005, to the Target Credit Card Master Trust, asset forth in Exhibit A to the accompanying Report of Management on Complianceas of December 31, 2005, and for the fiscal year then ended. The Bank’smanagement is responsible for the Bank’s compliance with those requirements.Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion based onour examination.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with attestation standards established by the Public CompanyAccounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, includedexamining, on a test basis, evidence about the Bank’s compliance with thoserequirements and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary inthe circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basisfor our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on theBank’s compliance with specified requirements.

 

In our opinion, management’sassertion that the Bank complied with the aforementioned requirements as of andfor the year ended December 31, 2005, is fairly stated, in all materialrespects.

 

 

 

February 15, 2006

 

 
|   |   | A Member  Practice of Ernst & Young Global |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------|

 

----
Editorial Note on Part 73
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 73 appear at 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001.

§ 73.3122 4-[(2,4-dimethylphenyl)azo]-2,4-dihydro-5-methyl-2-phenyl-3H-pyrazol-3-one. ( a ) *Identity.* The color additive is 4-[(2,4-dimethylphenyl)azo]-2,4-dihydro-5-methyl-2-phenyl-3*H-* pyrazol-3-one (CAS Reg. No. 6407-78-9).
( b ) *Uses and restrictions.* ( 1 ) The substances listed in paragraph (a) of this section may be used as a color additive in contact lenses in amounts not to exceed the minimum reasonably required to accomplish the intended coloring effect.
( 2 ) Authorization for this use shall not be construed as waiving any of the requirements of sections 510(k), 515, and 520(g) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act with respect to the contact lens in which the color additive is used.
( c ) *Labeling.* The label of the color additive shall conform to the requirements of § 70.25 of this chapter.
( d ) *Exemption from certification.* Certification of this color additive is not necessary for the protection of the public health, and therefore the color additive is exempt from the certification requirements of section 721(c) of the act.
[51 FR 11432, Apr. 3, 1986]
# C_2018328EN.01003701.xml

| 17.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/37

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2018 — NKT Verwaltungs and NKT v Commission

(Case T-447/14) (1)

((Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - European market for power cables - Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU - Single and continuous infringement - Evidence of the infringement - Duration of Involvement - Public Distancing - Calculation of the fine - Gravity of the infringement - Unlimited jurisdiction))

(2018/C 328/49)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: NKT Verwaltungs GmbH, formerly nkt cables GmbH (Cologne, Germany) and NKT A/S, formerly NKT Holding A/S (Brøndby, Denmark) (represented by: M. Kofmann and B. Creve, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Giolito, H. van Vliet and C. Vollrath, acting as Agents, and by B. Doherty, Barrister)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU primarily for annulment of Commission Decision C(2014) 2139 final of 2 April 2014 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 [TFEU] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case AT.39610 — Power Cables) in so far as it concerns the applicants and, in the alternative, an application for a reduction in the amount of the fine imposed on the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders NKT Verwaltungs GmbH and NKT A/S to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders NKT Verwaltungs GmbH and NKT A/S to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 282, 25.8.2014.

---
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: November 10, 2014 TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket I d: OAR

–2013 - 0602 FROM: Howard J. Hoffman , EPA - OGC SUBJECT: November 10, 2014 Phone Call with M.J. Bradley Regarding Proposed Clean

Power Plan for Existing Power Plants **SUMMARY** On November 10, 2014, Kevin Culligan (EPA - OAQPS) and I spoke b y telephone with Chris V an A tt e n of M.J. Bradley & Associates to discuss legal issues concerning the proposed Clean Power Plan for existing power plants.
# C_2015056EN.01002302.xml

| 16.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 56/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 56/23

---

Order of the General Court of 12 December 2014 — Alsharghawi v Council

(Case T-532/14) (1)

1

((Action for annulment - Common Foreign and Security Policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Libya - Freezing of funds and economic resources - Action for annulment - Period allowed for commencing proceedings - Inadmissibility))

(2015/C 056/33)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Bashir Saleh Bashir Alsharghawi (Johannesburg, South Africa) (represented by: E. Moutet, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Vitro and V. Piessevaux, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

APPLICATION for annulment, first, of Council Decision 2011/137/CFSP of 28 February 2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya (OJ 2011 L 58, p. 53), and, secondly, Council Decision 2011/178/CFSP of 23 March 2011 amending Decision 2011/137 (OJ 2011 L 78, p. 24), in so far as they apply to the applicant.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Mr Bashir Saleh Bashir Alsharghawi is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Bashir Saleh Bashir Alsharghawi is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 303, 8.9.2014.

1

---
DVD of the database used in EPA's modeling of risk from the aerospace facilities.

The database is on a DVD, available in the docket o ffice.
§ 520.1288 Lufenuron tablets. ( a ) *Specifications* — ( 1 ) Tablets containing 45, 90, 204.9, or 409.8 milligrams (mg) lufenuron for use as in paragraphs (c)(1)(i), (c)(1)(ii)(A), (c)(1)(iii), (c)(2)(i), (c)(2)(ii)(A), and (c)(2)(iii) of this section.
( 2 ) Flavored tablets containing 45, 90, 204.9, or 409.8 milligrams (mg) lufenuron for use as in paragraphs (c)(1)(i), (c)(1)(ii)(A) or (c)(1)(ii)(B), and (c)(1)(iii) of this section.
( 3 ) Flavored tablets containing 90 or 204.9 mg lufenuron for use as in paragraphs (c)(2)(i), (c)(2)(ii)(A) or (c)(2)(ii)(B), and (c)(2)(iii) of this section.
( 4 ) Flavored tablets containing 135 or 270 mg lufenuron for use as in paragraphs (c)(2)(i), (c)(2)(ii)(A), and (c)(2)(iii) of this section.
( b ) *Sponsor.* See No. 058198 in § 510.600(c) of this chapter.
( c ) *Conditions of use* — ( 1 ) *Dogs* — ( i ) *Amount.* Minimum of 10 mg lufenuron per kilogram (4.5 mg per pound (lb)) of body weight, once a month.
( ii ) *Indications for use* — ( A ) For the prevention and control of flea populations.
( B ) The concurrent use of flavored lufenuron tablets described in paragraph (a)(2) of this section as in paragraph (c)(1)(ii)(A) of this section with nitenpyram tablets as in § 520.1510(d)(1) of this chapter is indicated to kill adult fleas and prevent flea eggs from hatching.
( iii ) *Limitations.* For use in dogs and puppies 4 weeks of age and older.
( 2 ) *Cats* — ( i ) *Amount.* Minimum of 30 mg lufenuron per kilogram (13.6 mg/lb) of body weight, once a month.
( ii ) *Indications for use* — ( A ) For the control of flea populations.
( B ) The concurrent use of flavored lufenuron tablets described in paragraph (a)(3) of this section as in paragraph (c)(2)(ii)(A) of this section with nitenpyram tablets as in § 520.1510(d)(2) of this chapter is indicated to kill adult fleas and prevent flea eggs from hatching.
( iii ) *Limitations.* For use in cats and kittens 4 weeks of age and older.
[68 FR 51905, Aug. 29, 2003]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,293,620
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  4,303,900
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,623,114
<PP&E>                                         506,643
<DEPRECIATION>                                  36,005
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,627,145
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,946,379
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,578
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,679,088
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,627,145
<SALES>                                      4,588,511
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,588,511
<CGS>                                        2,843,822
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,843,822
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,289,583
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             101,498
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                353,608
<INCOME-TAX>                                   132,742
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   220,866
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.12
        

</TABLE>
MEMORANDUM FEB 2 6 2015

SUBJECT: New York Attainment Status for the Coarse Particle (PMIO)National Ambient Air

Quality Standards (NAAQS)

FROM: Richard Ruvo V i /1'/}

Chief /~tWtu{ f~

Air Programs Branch

TO: John Filippelli

Director

Clean Air and Sustainability Division

We have requested that the Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS) initiate a Federal

Register rulemaking action to make technical amendments and clarify that the 40 CFR Part 81 Tables

for New York erroneously list New York County as "nonattainment" for the PMIONAAQS, first

promulgated in 1987.

New York County was designated as nonattainment for the PMIONAAQS on December 21, 1993. At

the time of this designation, the PMIONAAQS included an annual standard of 50 micrograms per

cubic meter (u/rrr') calculated as an annual arithmetic mean averaged over three years, as well as a

24-hour standard of 150 u/rrr', not to be exceeded more than once per year on average over a three

year period. New York County was designated as nonattainment for the annual NAAQS only;

however, the Part 81 table does not make a distinction or specify which form of the standard the

nonattainment designation applied to.

The Madison Avenue monitor in New York County (AQS Site ID 36-061-0077) recorded violations

of the annual PMIONAAQS and was the basis for the county's nonattainment designation for this

NAAQS. This monitor continued to serve as the county's design value monitor until 1998; at this

time the monitor underwent modifications that made it no longer valid for comparison to the

NAAQS, i.e., it no longer met the siting criteria for a Federal Reference Method (FRM) monitor.

As a result, decisions regarding PMIOair quality since 1998 have been informed upon ambient air

quality data collected at other FRM or Federal Equivalent Method monitoring sites in New York

County, including the Post Office site (AQS ID 36-061-0062). Notably, a clean data determination

for the PMIONAAQS was finalized in the Federal Register on December 2,2013. This clean data

determination applied to both forms of the PMIONAAQS for New York County even though the

annual PMIONAAQS was revoked on October 17,2006. It should be noted that none of the monitors

in New York County have recorded violations of the annual PMIONAAQS since 1998, and no

violations of the 24-hour PMIONAAQS have ever been recorded in the county.

Attached are documents supporting the factual history that New York County was designated as

nonattainment for the annual PMIONAAQS only and, as a result, the Part 81 Table for the state

should be amended to reflect these facts instead of memorializing New York County as

nonattainment for an unspecified form of the PMIONAAQS.

Attachments

cc: Rhea Jones, OAQPS
§ 640.13 Collection of the blood. ( a ) The source blood shall be collected as prescribed in § 640.4.
( b ) Source blood may also be derived from Whole Blood manufactured in accordance with applicable provisions of this subchapter.
[38 FR 32089, Nov. 20, 1973, as amended at 50 FR 4139, Jan. 29, 1985; 64 FR 45372, Aug. 19, 1999]
§ 528.1080 Bc2371 recombinant deoxyribonucleic acid construct. ( a ) *Specifications and intended use.* A single copy of Bc2371, a human Factor VII recombinant deoxyribonucleic acid (rDNA) gene construct, located on chromosome 3p1.1-2 in a diploid line (R69) of hemizygous and homozygous New Zealand white rabbits (*Oryctolagus cuniculus*).
( b ) *Sponsor.* See No. 086047 in § 510.600 of this chapter.
( c ) *Conditions of use* — ( 1 ) *Intended use.* The construct directs gene expression of recombinant human Factor VII (hFVII) in the mammary gland such that recombinant hFVII zymogen is present in the rabbit milk, enabling purification and activation of recombinant hFVIIa intended for the treatment of hemophilia A or B in humans with inhibitors to Factors VIII and IX.
( 2 ) *Limitations.* Food or feed from R69 rabbits is not permitted in the food or feed supply.
[84 FR 12494, Apr. 2, 2019]
Editorial Note on Part 73
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 73 appear at 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001.

§ 73.225 Jagua (genipin-glycine) blue. ( a ) *Identity.* ( 1 ) The color additive jagua (genipin-glycine) blue is a dark blue powder or liquid prepared from the juice of the unripe fruit of *Genipa americana* by reacting the genipin in the juice with glycine using mild heat. The color additive contains a polymer as the principal coloring component and three dimers as minor coloring components.
( 2 ) Color additive mixtures for food use made with jagua (genipin-glycine) blue may contain only those diluents that are suitable and are listed in this subpart as safe for use in color additive mixtures for coloring foods.
( b ) *Specifications.* Jagua (genipin-glycine) blue must conform to the following specifications and must be free from impurities, other than those named, to the extent that such other impurities may be avoided by good manufacturing practice: ( 1 ) Arsenic, not more than 1 milligram/kilogram (mg/kg) (1 part per million (ppm)).
( 2 ) Cadmium, not more than 1 mg/kg (1 ppm).
( 3 ) Lead, not more than 1 mg/kg (1 ppm).
( 4 ) Mercury, not more than 1 mg/kg (1 ppm).
( 5 ) Genipin, not more than 20 mg/kg (20 ppm).
( c ) *Uses and restrictions.* Jagua (genipin-glycine) blue may be safely used for coloring flavored milk; dairy drinks and substitutes; dairy and dairy alternative yogurt; ice cream, frozen dairy and dairy alternative desserts, puddings, gelatins, ices, sorbets; ready-to-eat multicolored cereals; flavored potato chips, tortilla, corn, and other chips; candy and chewing gum; non-alcoholic fruit based/flavored drinks, nutritional beverages and smoothies; flavored cream cheese-based spreads; and icings, frostings, jams, syrups, and fruit toppings and fillings at levels consistent with good manufacturing practice, except that it may not be used for coloring foods for which standards of identity have been issued under section 401 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, unless the use of added color is authorized by such standards.
( d ) *Labeling requirements.* The label of the color additive and any mixtures prepared therefrom intended solely or in part for coloring purposes must conform to the requirements of § 70.25 of this chapter.
( e ) *Exemption from certification.* Certification of this color additive is not necessary for the protection of the public health and therefore batches thereof are exempt from the certification requirements of section 721(c) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
[88 FR 75494, Nov. 3, 2023]