alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016165EN.01002002.xml

| 10.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/20

---

Order of the General Court of 21 March 2016 — Yassin v Council

(Case T-376/14) (1)

1

(2016/C 165/24)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 245, 28.7.2014.

1

---
Exhibit 14.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Deswell Industries, Inc.

We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-110236, 333-130738, 333-147790 and 333-171314) of Deswell Industries, Inc. (the Company) of our reports dated August 2, 2011,
relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this Form 20-F.



|               
|---------------
|/s/ BDO Limited
|BDO Limited    

Hong Kong, August 2, 2011
Editorial Note on Part 866
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 866 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 866.3270 *Flavobacterium* spp. serological reagents. ( a ) *Identification. Flavobacterium* spp. serological reagents are devices that consist of antigens and antisera used in serological tests to identify *Flavobacteriuim* spp. from cultured isolates derived from clinical specimens. The identification aids in the diagnosis of disease caused by bacteria belonging to the genus *Flavobacterium* and provides epidemiological information on diseases caused by these microorganisms. Most members of this genus are found in soil and water and, under certain conditions, may become pathogenic to humans. *Flavobacterium meningosepticum* is highly virulent for the newborn, in whom it may cause epidemics of septicemia (blood poisoning) and meningitis (inflammation of the membranes of the brain) and is usually attributable to contaminated hospital equipment.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 866.9.
[47 FR 50823, Nov. 9, 1982, as amended at 54 FR 25046, June 12, 1989; 66 FR 38792, July 25, 2001]
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 13-0810 0811, 0812, 0813, 0814, 0815, 0816, 0817, 0 9, 0820, 

0821

Focus Ready Draft 8/29/2013

ENGINEER: Prothero \ REC 

SUBMITTER: 

USE:
 
 
 

 

 
_INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 13-0810 0811, 0812, 0813, 0814, 0815, 0816, 0817, 08 , 0820, 

0821

_INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 13-0810 0811, 0812, 0813, 0814, 0815, 0816, 0817, 08 , 0820, 

0821


_INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 13-0810 0811, 0812, 0813, 0814, 0815, 0816, 0817, 08 , 0820, 

0821
# C_2016016EN.01003201.xml

| 18.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/32

---

Judgment of the General Court of 25 November 2015 — Masafi v OHIM — Hd1 (masafi)

(Case T-249/14) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark masafi - Earlier national word mark masafi - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2016/C 016/39)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Masafi Co. LLC (Dubai, United Arab Emirates) (represented by: G. Hinarejos Mulliez, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Hd1 Ltd (Huddersfield, United Kingdom)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 February 2014 (Case R 1131/2013-4), concerning opposition proceedings between Hd1 Limited and Masafi Co. LLC.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Masafi Co. LLC to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Masafi Co. LLC to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).

---

(1)  OJ C 235, 21.7.2014.

1

---
---

Exhibit 13.B

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with Annual Report of Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal period ended May 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ezequiel Sirotinsky, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge: 1.
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materials respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Ezequiel Sirotinsky 
    Ezequiel Sirotinsky
    (principal financial and accounting officer) Dated: August 29, 2011 The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.


---
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-81208, 333-71954, 333-70976, 333-60132, 333-43038, 333-40322 and 333-35876
on Form S-3 and Nos. 333-70982, 333-38964 and 333-35874 on Form S-8 of our
report dated May 29, 2002, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of
GlycoGenesys, Inc. (formerly SafeScience, Inc.) for the year ended December 31,
2001.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
May 29, 2002
38974.

#### KING v. ELLIS.

Decided September 6, 1961.

*336
      *Miles B. Sams,*for plaintiff in error.

*Greer, Morris, Bartholomew & Finley, Richard G. Greer,*contra.

Felton, Chief Judge.

The evidence adduced at the trial is ample to support the verdict and judgment. The general-grounds are without merit.

Special ground 4 of the plaintiff’s motion for new trial assigns error on the court’s failure to charge three propositions which were tendered to the court by a timely, written request. Paragraph 2 of the requested charge was as follows: “If the highway is wet and slippery by reason of *falling rain*and the condition of the highway is such that driving a vehicle at a certain speed is likely to cause such vehicle to- skid upon the application of its brakes and crash into *cars moving in the opposite direction,*that such rate of speed would be unlawful.” (Italics ours). The pleadings and the evidence show that there was ice on the pavement, not “falling rain,” as the plaintiff’s request stated, and also that the automobiles were moving in the same direction, rather than “in the opposite direction.” “A request to- charge the jury, directed to the trial judge, submitted in writing before the retirement of the- jury, must be entirely correct and accurate; it must be adjusted to the pleadings, the law, and the evidence in the case; it must not be argumentative ; and it must not seek an expression of opinion on the part of the trial judge.” *New York Life Ins. Co. v. Thompson,*50 Ga. App. 413 (1) (178 SE 389); *McKinney v. Woodard,*94 Ga. App. 340 (1) (94SE2d 620); *Childers v. Ackerman Const. Co., 211*Ga. 350 (1) (86 SE2d 227). The request was not adjusted to the pleadings and the evidence in the case, as shown above, hence the refusal to charge the- requested proposition was not error. Whether or not the other two paragraphs of the requested charge are correct and applicable is immaterial. “Where a series of propositions are presented in bloc in a single request to charge, the court is not required to give them or any part of them, if any one of them is erroneous or inapplicable to the case on trial.” *Western Union Tel. Co. v. Owens,*23 Ga. App. 169 (5) (98 SE 116); *Mayor &c. of Savannah v. Centennial Mill Co.,*46 Ga. App. 725 (1) (169 SE 40); *Shippey*
      *337
      *Bros. White v. Owens,*17 Ga. App. 127 (3), 130 (86 SE 407) ; *Davis v. Guffey,*196 Ga. 816, 818 (27 SE2d 689); *Thompson v. O’Connor,*115 Ga. 120 (5), 123 (41 SE 242).

The request to charge not being entirely correct and the general grounds being without merit, the court did not err in its judgment denying the plaintiff’s motion for new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Beil and Hall, JJ., concur.*
Editorial Note on Part 73
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 73 appear at 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001.

§ 73.1496 Mica. ( a ) *Identity.* ( 1 ) The color additive mica is a white powder obtained from the naturally occurring mineral, muscovite mica, consisting predominantly of a potassium aluminum silicate, K2Al4(Al2Si6O20)(OH)4 or, alternatively, H2KAl3 (SiO4)3. Mica may be identified and semiquantitatively determined by its characteristic X-ray diffraction pattern and by its optical properties.
( 2 ) Color additive mixtures for drug use made with mica may contain only those diluents listed in this subpart as safe and suitable for use in color additive mixtures for coloring drugs.
( b ) *Specifications.* Mica shall conform to the following specifications and shall be free from impurities other than those named to the extent that such other impurities may be avoided by good manufacturing practice: Fineness, 100 percent shall pass through a 100-mesh sieve. Loss on ignition at 600-650 °C, not more than 2 percent. Lead (as Pb), not more than 20 parts per million. Arsenic (as As), not more than 3 parts per million. Mercury (as Hg), not more than 1 part per million.
( c ) *Uses and restrictions.* Mica may be safely used in amounts consistent with good manufacturing practice to color dentifrices and externally applied drugs, including those for use in the area of the eye.
( d ) *Labeling requirements.* The label of the color additive and of any mixture prepared therefrom intended solely or in part for coloring purposes shall conform to the requirements of § 70.25 of this chapter.
( e ) *Exemption from certification.* Certification of this color additive is not necessary for the protection of the public health, and therefore batches therof are exempt from the certification requirements of section 721(c) of the act.
[42 FR 38561, July 29, 1977, as amended at 52 FR 29665, Aug. 11, 1987]
# C_2015262EN.01002401.xml

| 10.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/24

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2015 — Norma Lebensmittelfilialbetrieb v OHIM — Yorma’s (Yorma Eberl)

(Case T-229/14) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark Yorma Eberl - Earlier Community and national word marks NORMA - Relative grounds for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2015/C 262/32)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Norma Lebensmittelfilialbetrieb Stiftung & Co. KG (Nuremberg, Germany) (represented by: A. Parr, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Yorma’s AG (Deggendorf, Germany) (represented by: A. Weiß and C. Muck, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 February 2014 (Case R 532/2013-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Norma Lebensmittelfilialbetrieb Stiftung & Co. KG and Yorma’s AG.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Norma Lebensmittelfilialbetrieb Stiftung & Co. KG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Norma Lebensmittelfilialbetrieb Stiftung & Co. KG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 194, 24.6.2014.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 3 (Wednesday, January 5, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 575]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-33320]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Initial Review 
Group; Neuroscience of Aging Review Committee.
    Date: March 3-4, 2011.
    Time: 4 p.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military 
Road, NW., Washington, DC 20015.
    Contact Person: William Cruce, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Institute on Aging, Scientific Review 
Office, Gateway Building 2C-212, 7201 Wisconsin Ave., Bethesda, MD 
20814, 301-402-7704, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#94f7e6e1f7f1e3d4fafdf5bafafdfcbaf3fbe2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="13706166707664537d7a723d7d7a7b3d747c65">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 28, 2010.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-33320 Filed 1-4-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 522.1350 Melatonin implant. ( a ) *Specifications.* The drug is a silicone rubber elastomer implant containing 2.7 milligrams of melatonin.
( b ) *Sponsor.* See No. 053923 in § 510.600(c) of this chapter.
( c ) *Conditions of use* — ( 1 ) *Amount.* One implant per mink.
( 2 ) *Indications for use.* For use in healthy male and female kit and adult female mink (*Mustela vison*) to accelerate the fur priming cycle.
( 3 ) *Limitations.* For subcutaneous implantation in mink only. Do not implant potential breeding stock. Do not use in food-producing animals.
[59 FR 37422, July 22, 1994]
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 18, 2022

No. 04-22-00647-CV

IN RE Denise Marie RAMOS

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

On September 30, 2022, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Relator represented

in her petition that copies of the relevant summary judgment orders2 would be included in her

appendix. Relator’s appendix does not contain the relevant summary judgment orders. We

ORDER relator to file a supplemental appendix containing the relevant summary judgment

orders on or before October 24, 2022.

This court believes a serious question concerning the mandamus relief sought requires

further consideration. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(b). Respondent and real party in interest may file

a response to the petition in this court on or before fifteen days from the date the supplemental

appendix is filed. Any such response must conform to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4.

It is so ORDERED on October 18, 2022.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ, 

 CLERK OF COURT

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2018-CI-21009, styled In the Matter of the Marriage of Denise Marie 

Ramos and Reynaldo Esparza Jr, pending in the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable 

Laura Salinas presiding.

2 The relevant summary judgment orders include rulings on relator’s claims for an informal marriage, breach of 

contract, real estate fraud, and quantum meruit.
Exhibit 16

                [LETTERHEAD OF WIENER, GOODMAN & COMPANY, P.C.]

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street NW
Washington, DC 20549

We were previously the independent accountants for Regent Group, Inc. On October
10, 2001, the Board of Directors of Regent Group, Inc. dismissed us as the
independent accountants of Regent Group, Inc.

We have read Regent Group, Inc.'s statements included under Item 4 of its Form
8-K dated October 10, 2001, and we agree with such statements.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Wiener, Goodman & Company, P.C.

Wiener, Goodman & Company, P.C.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 229 (Friday, November 28, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 70913]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28048]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 8958]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Frida Kahlo and Diego Rivera From the Jacques and 
Natasha Gelman Collection and 20th Century Mexican Art From the Stanley 
and Pearl Goodman Collection''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Frida Kahlo and Diego Rivera from the 
Jacques and Natasha Gelman Collection and 20th Century Mexican Art from 
the Stanley and Pearl Goodman Collection,'' imported from abroad for 
temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural 
significance. The objects are imported pursuant to a loan agreement 
with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that the 
exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Nova Southeastern 
University Museum of Art, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, from on or about 
February 26, 2015, until on or about May 31, 2015, and at possible 
additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the 
national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the imported objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202-632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of 
State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: November 20, 2014.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-28048 Filed 11-26-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
# C_2014431EN.01004602.xml

| 1.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 431/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 431/46

---

Order of the General Court of 2 September 2014 — Petropars and Others v Council

(Case T-370/14) (1)

1

(2014/C 431/73)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 261, 11.8.2014.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                              100
<SECURITIES>                                      7,850
<RECEIVABLES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  7,950
<PP&E>                                           29,774
<DEPRECIATION>                                   13,634
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   37,724
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           671,463
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           739,696
<PREFERRED>                                      28,923
<COMMON>                                     21,297,570
<OTHER-SE>                                     (633,739)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     37,724
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      0
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 30,471
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (33,674)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (33,674)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (33,674)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0.00


</TABLE>