alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 10.5

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Forms F-3 No. 333-12096, No. 333-13550 and No. 333-84510) of
Deutsche Telekom AG and in the related Prospectuses of our report dated May 20,
2003, except for Note 26, as to which the date is June 4, 2003, relating to the
consolidated financial statements of OJSC Mobile TeleSystems and subsidiaries,
included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F/A for the year ended December 31,
2002.

June 26, 2003

ZAO Deloitte & Touche CIS
Moscow, Russia
| (1)   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                  | CEC Entertainment,      Inc. |                                |
|-----------------------|------------------------------|-------------------------------------|
|                  |                         |                                |   |
| October      29, 2009 | By:                          | /s/ Christopher      D. Morris |   |
|                  |                         | Christopher      D. Morris          |   |
|                  |                         | Executive      Vice President  |   |
|                  |                         |  Chief      Financial Officer  |   |
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**

 

We consent to the incorporation by referencein Registration Statement Nos. 333-81208, 333-71954, 333-70976, 333-60132, 333-43038, 333-40322 and 333-35876 on Form S-3 and Nos. 333-70982, 333-38964 and 333-35874 on Form S-8 of GlycoGenesys, Inc. (formerly SafeScience, Inc.) of our report datedMarch 28, 2003 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph referring to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern), relating to the consolidated financial statements of GlycoGenesys, Inc.(formerly SafeScience, Inc.) as of and for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of GlycoGenesys, Inc. (formerly SafeScience, Inc.) for the year ended December 31, 2002. 

 

/s/    DELOITTE & TOUCHELLP 

 

Boston, Massachusetts

March 28, 2003
Editorial Note on Part 862
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 862 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 862.1055 Newborn screening test system for amino acids, free carnitine, and acylcarnitines using tandem mass spectrometry. ( a ) *Identification.* A newborn screening test system for amino acids, free carnitine, and acylcarnitines using tandem mass spectrometry is a device that consists of stable isotope internal standards, control materials, extraction solutions, flow solvents, instrumentation, software packages, and other reagents and materials. The device is intended for the measurement and evaluation of amino acids, free carnitine, and acylcarnitine concentrations from newborn whole blood filter paper samples. The quantitative analysis of amino acids, free carnitine, and acylcarnitines and their relationship with each other provides analyte concentration profiles that may aid in screening newborns for one or more inborn errors of amino acid, free carnitine, and acyl-carnitine metabolism.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special control is FDA's guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Newborn Screening Test Systems for Amino Acids, Free Carnitine, and Acylcarnitines Using Tandem Mass Spectrometry.” See § 862.1(d) for the availability of this guidance document.
[69 FR 68255, Nov. 24, 2004]
# C_2015262EN.01004402.xml

| 10.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/44

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 29 June 2015 — Campanella v Commission

(Case F-64/14) (1)

1

(2015/C 262/61)

Language of the case: French

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 361, 13.10.2014, p. 31.

1

---
# C_2015155EN.01003902.xml

| 11.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/39

---

Order of the General Court of 16 March 2015 — Buderus Guss v Commission

(Case T-302/14) (1)

1

(2015/C 155/51)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 223, 14.7.2014.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 42 (Thursday, March 4, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 9912]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4493]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Heart, Lung, and Blood Initial Review Group; 
Heart, Lung, and Blood Program Project Review Committee.
    Date: March 19, 2010.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Jeffrey H. Hurst, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Review Branch/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood 
Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7208, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, 
301-435-0303, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#573f222524233d17393f3b353e79393e3f79303821"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2c44595e5f58466c4244404e4502424544024b435a">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 23, 2010.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-4493 Filed 3-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Grinnell *v.*Grinnell.

No. 9019.

June 16, 1932.

Gilbert, J.

1. “A petitioner may dismiss his petition at any time, either in term or vacation, so that he does not thereby prejudice any right of the defendant.” Civil Code (1910), § 5548. There being a cross-action filed by the defendant praying for alimony, the dismissal of the plaintiff’s petition could not in any way affect the right of the wife as defendant to proceed for the affirmative relief prayed for in her cross-action.

2. *“A*lunatic, or person non compos mentis, having no legal guardian, may sue by any competent person as next friend.” *Dent*v. *Merriam,*113 *Ga.*83 (2) (38 S. E. 334); *Ross*v. *Battle,*113 *Ga.*742 (39 S. E. 287); *Archer*v. *Archer,*115 *Ga.*950 (42 S. E. 219); *Stanley*v. *Stanley,*123 *Ga.*122 (51 S. E. 287). As in the case of a minor, where an insane person appears by a next friend, there is no legal necessity to appoint a guardian ad litem, unless for some reason it should be made to appear to the court that the next friend was not a suitable person, or for some other reason the interest of the insane person would not be properly protected. Compare *Sanders*v. *Hinton,*171 *Ga.*702, 708 (156 S. E. 812). The issue arises here on consideration of demurrer. It does not appear that the case falls within the exception stated.

3. The cross-action by the wife alleged that she had been adjudged insane, that she had been committed to the Florida State Hospital, that no guardian had been appointed, that she had been discharged by the proper authorities into the custody of her husband, and that it had never been adjudged that she had been restored to sanity. Accordingly, under the allegations of the petition it was competent for the wife to institute her cross-action by next friend, praying for alimony.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Russell, O. J., Beck, P. J., and Atkinson and Sill, JJ., concur.*

*905
      *W. H. Terrell,*for plaintiff in error. *Bon K. Johnston,*contra.
§ 582.6193 Calcium chloride. ( a ) *Product.* Calcium chloride.
( b ) *Conditions of use.* This substance is generally recognized as safe when used in accordance with good manufacturing or feeding practice.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996             MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         135,763                 135,763
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,141,214               1,141,214
<ALLOWANCES>                                    40,457                  40,457
<INVENTORY>                                  1,151,961               1,151,961
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,490,393               2,490,393
<PP&E>                                       1,074,865               1,074,865
<DEPRECIATION>                                 951,739                 951,739
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,660,735               2,660,735
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,520,176               1,520,176
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        29,431                  29,431
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,111,128               1,111,128
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,660,735               2,660,735
<SALES>                                      1,794,329               5,455,786
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,796,468               5,461,709
<CGS>                                          814,834               2,506,156
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  814,834               2,506,156
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,067,306               3,357,633
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,052                  46,462
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (100,724)               (448,542)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (100,724)               (448,542)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (100,724)               (448,542)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)                   (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)                   (.15)
        

</TABLE>
Your voice-mail 

 Bill Maxwell 

 to: Cortney_Higgins 

 11/13/2012 02:14 PM 

 Cc: RobertJ Wayland 

 

Cortney -- 

Our heat rate is gross, based on the 2010 ICR data as reported by Nucla 

(110 MW gross output and a maximum heat input of 1,032 MMBtu/hr), which 

yields an efficiency of about 37%. This is how we calculated heat rates 

(and subsequently lb/MWh) for all EGUs in the MATS analyses. 

Electrical Output = 110 MWe 

Max heat input = 1032 MMBtu/hr 

Heat rate (HR) = 1032/110 == 9.38 MMBtu/MWh 

Thermal Efficiency = [(3412.75)/(HR*1000)]*100 ==> 36.4 % (~37%) 

We are not aware of DOE's values or where they come from. 

Thank you. 

Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt 

Bill Maxwell 

Energy Strategies Group 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

U.S. EPA Mail Code D243-01 

109 T.W. Alexander Drive 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

Phone: 919-541-5430 

FAX: 919-541-5450
### -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

36 38 40 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 06/27 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 27 Jun 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 76.30 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■


## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ● ● ●



## ★ ● ● ● ●
# C_2015081EN.01000401.xml

| 9.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 81/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 81/4

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Udine (Italy) lodged on 28 November 2014 — Degano Trasporti S.a.s. di Ferruccio Degano & C., in liquidazione

(Case C-546/14)

(2015/C 081/05)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale di Udine

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Degano Trasporti S.a.s. di Ferruccio Degano & C., in liquidation

Applicant:

Question referred

Question referred

On a proper construction of the principles and rules contained in Article 4(3) TEU and Council Directive 2006/112/EC (1), as already interpreted in the judgments of the Court of Justice of 17 July 2008 in C-132/06, of 11 December 2008 in C-174/07, and of 29 March 2012 in C-500/10, must those principles and rules also be interpreted in such a way that a national rule (and, therefore, in respect of the case in the main proceedings, an interpretation of Articles 162 and 182(b) of the Bankruptcy Law) is incompatible [with EU law] where, under that rule, a proposal for an arrangement with creditors with the liquidation of the debtor’s assets, permits only partial payment of the State’s claim in respect of VAT, where there is no tax settlement and where, in respect of that claim, a larger payment in the event of bankruptcy is not foreseeable on the basis of an assessment by an independent expert and following the formal review of the court?

1

---

(1)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).

1

---
```

[115th Congress Public Law 295]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 132 STAT. 4379]]

Public Law 115-295
115th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
    530 Claremont Avenue in Ashland, Ohio, as the ``Bill Harris Post 
            Office''. <<NOTE: Dec. 6, 2018 -  [H.R. 5868]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. BILL HARRIS POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 530 Claremont Avenue in Ashland, Ohio, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Bill Harris Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Bill Harris 
Post Office''.

    Approved December 6, 2018.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5868:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018):
            Sept. 13, considered and passed House.
            Nov. 15, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 7 (Tuesday, January 12, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 1583]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-442]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 12, 2010 / 
Notices

[[Page 1583]]



FINANCIAL CRISIS INQUIRY COMMISSION


Notice of Open Meeting

SUMMARY: The Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission (FCIC) announces that 
it will hold its first public hearing, in which the Commission will 
begin its thorough examination of the root causes of the crisis by 
hearing testimony on the causes and current state of the crisis. Top 
leaders of both private and public sector entities that played critical 
roles in the crisis will testify.

DATES: The open meeting will be held on Wednesday, January 13, 2010, 
and Thursday, January 14, 2010, commencing on both days at 9 a.m.

ADDRESSES: The open meeting will be held in the hearing room of the 
Committee on Ways and Means U.S. House of Representatives, 1100 
Longworth House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Financial Crisis Inquiry 
Commission, 1717 Pennsylvania Avenue, Suite 800, Washington, DC 20006, 
202-292-2799, 202-632-1604 fax.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the Financial Crisis Inquiry 
Commission is to examine the causes, domestic and global, of the 
current financial and economic crisis in the United States, per the 
requirements of the Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act of 2009 
(``FERN's), Section 5, Public Law 111-21,123 Stat. 1617 (2009).
    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. The 
Chairman of the Commission will lead the meeting for the orderly 
conduct of business.

    Dated: January 7, 2009.
Phil Angelides,
Chairman, Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-442 Filed 1-11-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-RK-M
Editorial Note on Part 862
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 862 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 862.2485 Electrophoresis apparatus for clinical use. ( a ) *Identification.* An electrophoresis apparatus for clinical use is a device intended to separate molecules or particles, including plasma proteins, lipoproteins, enzymes, and hemoglobulins on the basis of their net charge in specified buffered media. This device is used in conjunction with certain materials to measure a variety of analytes as an aid in the diagnosis and treatment of certain disorders.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9.
[52 FR 16122, May 1, 1987, as amended at 60 FR 38900, July 28, 1995; 66 FR 38788, July 25, 2001]
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 99-3521

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the District

v. * of Nebraska.

*

Calvin James, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: June 22, 2000

Filed: June 29, 2000 

___________

Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, FAGG and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Calvin James pleaded guilty to one count of bank fraud. James now appeals, and

we affirm. First, James cannot establish his claim of a jurisdictional defect in the

superseding indictment because he has not shown the indictment failed on its face to

state the offense of bank fraud. See O'Leary v. United States, 856 F.2d 1142, 1143

(8th Cir. 1988) (per curiam) (standard for showing jurisdictional defect in indictment);

United States v. Whitehead, 176 F.3d 1030, 1037 n.2 (8th Cir. 1999) (elements of bank

fraud). Second, we reject James's contention that the district court improperly ordered

him to make restitution without considering his ability to pay – "[t]he Mandatory
-2-

Victim Restitution Act of 1996 . . . requires restitution for injuries inflicted in the

course of crimes involving fraud . . . [and] requires that restitution be ordered 'without

consideration of the economic circumstances of the defendant.'" United States v.

Mathison, 157 F.3d 541, 551 (8th Cir. 1998) (citing 18 U.S.C. § 3663A(c)(1)(A)(ii)

(Supp. III 1997) and quoting 18 U.S.C. § 3664(f)(1)(A) (Supp. III 1997)), cert. denied,

525 U.S. 1089 (1999). Third, James's claim that he should not be required to pay

restitution to certain financial institutions is meritless because, even assuming we agree

with James's claim that these institutions were not victims of his crime, James agreed

in his plea agreement to make restitution to them. See 18 U.S.C. § 3663A(a)(3) (Supp.

III 1997) ("[t]he court shall also order, if agreed to by the parties in a plea agreement,

restitution to persons other than the victim of the offense"). Fourth, contrary to James's

view, the Government proved by a preponderance of the evidence the amount of

restitution awarded to victims Connie Stallworth and Lucinda Merritt. See id. §

3664(e). Fifth, by pleading guilty, James waived his claims of prosecutorial

misconduct and vindictive prosecution. See United States v. Fitzhugh, 78 F.3d 1326,

1330 (8th Cir. 1996). Sixth, we decline to address James's ineffective assistance of

counsel claim because that claim is properly raised in postconviction proceedings. See

United States v. Martinez-Cruz, 186 F.3d 1102, 1105 (8th Cir. 1999). Finally, we deny

the motion of James's counsel to withdraw; however, when James's counsel informs the

clerk of this court that he has complied with Part V of this court's Plan to Expedite

Criminal Appeals, we will reconsider his motion to withdraw.

Having carefully reviewed the parties' briefs and the record, we affirm without

further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
-3-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 23.2CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements on Form S-8(333-53374, 333-105963 and 333-127025) and S-3 (333-106126, 333-117264, 333-119864, 333-128074,333-138748, 333-143023 and 333-149030) of Evergreen Solar, Inc. of our report dated February 27, 2007 relating to thefinancial statements of EverQ GmbH, which appears in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the yearended December 31, 2007./s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers AG