alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT
In re : NEAL JONES; AMY JONES,

De btors,

------------------------------ NEAL JONES; AM Y JONES,

Appe lla nts,
v. R UC HIR PATEL, Appe lle e . No. 23-60018 B AP No. 22-1104
M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Ninth C irc uit B ankruptc y

Appe lla te Pane l Faris, La ffe rty

III, and Spra

ke r, B ankruptc y

Judge s, Pre siding Subm itte d Nove m

be r 9, 2023 ** Phoe nix, Ariz ona B e fore : SC HR O EDER , C OLLINS, a nd DESAI, C irc uit Judge s . 

# FIL ED
N OV 14 2023 M OLLY C. DW Y E R, CLERK U. S. CO URT O F A PPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by Ninth C irc uit R

ule 36-3.

* * The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).The ba nkruptc y c o urt e nte re d judgm e nt in fa v or of judgm e nt c re ditor, R uc hir Pate l, holding tha

t his Illinois judgm

e nt wa s e nforc e a

ble a ga inst the
c om m unity prope rty of Appe l la

nts Ne a l an d Am

y Jone s in Ariz ona . The B ankruptc y

Appe l late Pane l (“ B AP” ) a ffirm e d , a nd the Jone se s a

ppe a l. W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C
. § 158(d), a nd we a ffirm
. Appe lla nts c onte nd tha

t unde r Ariz . R e v. Stat. § 25-215(D), the judgm e nt is not e nforc e a

ble a ga inst thec om

m unity be c a use Pa te l did not join both spouse s in the Illinois ac tion. W e hav e he ld tha t § 25-215(D) doe s not re quire joinde r to
e xe c ute a fore ign judgm e nt a ga inst c om m unity prope rty whe re , a s he re , the de bt is
a c om m unity obliga tion, a nd the re wa s no ba sis to na m e both spouse s in the fore ign a c tion. Se e Gagan v . Sharar , 376 F.3d 987, 992 (9th C ir. 2004). Appe lla nts a c knowle dge Gagan but c onte nd tha t a n inte rve ning Ariz ona Supre m e C ourt de c ision unde rm ine s its holding. Se e Lattin v . Shamroc k Mate rials, LLC

, 503 P.3d 116 (Ariz . 2022). Lattin , howe ve r, involve d a n a ward of fe e s and c osts, not a

fore ign judgm e n t. Id. at 120. It did not affe c t the va lidity of Gagan o r ove rrule any

of the c a se s on whic h G agan re lie d. The re is no re a son to c e rtify this c a s e to the Ariz ona

Supre m e C ourt. Se e C hildre ss v . C ostc o W h ole sale C orp. , 978 F.3d 664, 665 (9th C ir. 2020). Gagan

2a sse sse s the re le va nt Ariz o na c a se la

w a nd is binding pre c e de nt re quiring
a ffirm anc e . C e rtific ation would only c re ate furthe r de la

y . AFFIRM E D.

3
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


Parent
------

The Southern Banc Company, Inc.


                                           State or Other           Percentage
Subsidiaries (1)                    Jurisdiction of Incorporation   Ownership
----------------                    -----------------------------   ---------
First Federal Savings and Loan           United States                 100%
Association of Gadsden

First Service Corporation (2)            Alabama                       100%


-------------------------
(1)  The assets, liabilities and operations of the subsidiaries are included in
     the consolidated financial statements contained in the financial statements
     attached hereto as an exhibit.

(2)  Prior to July 1998, First Service Corporation had been a wholly owned
     subsidiary of the Association
Item #30 – Adopt the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP)

December 7, 2012

Motion by Mayor Yates:

1. To remove CTS-04 from the 2012 AQMP, which contains the LVP exemption issue; and

2. To prepare a letter from Dr. Burke to CARB Chairman Nichols requesting a study which 

evaluates whether some of the exempt LVP substances contribute to ozone and should be 

further controlled fro ozone attainment purposes. the letter should offer our technical 

assistance and possible funding assistance for each study, and emphasize the need to partner 

with affected businesses in conducting such study; and

3. Have staff make a presentation to the Stationary Source Committee in January or February 

2013 regarding our staff’s preliminary study of LVP materials that led to the draft AQMP 

measure, and to also present the draft letter from Chairman Burke to Mary Nichols to the 

Committee.

Motion by Councilmember Mitchell:

1. Relative only to Control measure IND-01, the Port Backstop Measure, continue the hearing 

to our Board’s February 1st public meeting; and

2. Direct that the District staff prepare a detailed presentation on the need and legal basis for the 

Port Backstop Measure and continue to seek input on the Port Backstop measure from 

interested parties during the interim period. A special effort should be made between AQMD 

and the Ports of Los Angeles and Long beach to resolve the existing differences; and

3. Schedule a meeting of the Board’s Marine Port Committee for the latter part of January to 

review progress on resolving issues raised during the 2012 AQMP process.

Amending main motion to Approve the Plan by Supervisor Gonzales:

Move that during rulemaking process and implementation of AQMP that staff work with

affected businesses and industries on strategies to minimize the impact to those regulated 

parties by means including, but not limited to, incentives, loan programs and education and 

outreach, and further, seek to leverage and maximize available funds to support the business 

community in implementing and complying with regulations.
|   | (a)    | increase the interest of such persons in the Company’s welfare;               |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                |
|   | (b)    | furnish an incentive to such persons to continue their services to the Company; and |
|   |   |                                                                                |
|   | (c)    | provide a means through which the Company may attract able persons as employees.    |

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

|   | (a)    | An appropriate adjustment shall be made in the maximum number of shares of Common Stock then subject to being awarded under the Plan and in the maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be awarded to a Participant to the end that the same proportion of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock shall continueto be subject to being so awarded. |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
|   | (b)    | Appropriate adjustments shall be made in the number of outstanding shares of Restricted Stock with respect to which Forfeiture Restrictions have not yet lapsed or outstanding shares of Common Stock that are subject to a Restricted Stock Unit that have not vested or have yet been issued prior to any such change.                                                           |

----

----

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [Order No. 1663]

Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

                    Whereas, the Greater Metropolitan Area Foreign-Trade Zone Commission,                           ( print page 8919)                        grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 119 (Minneapolis, Minnesota), has submitted a request on behalf of Uponor, Inc. (Uponor), operator of Subzone 119B at the Uponor polyethylene tubing manufacturing and distribution facilities in Apple Valley, Minnesota, to expand and reorganize the subzone and to expand the scope of FTZ manufacturing authority to include new production capacity (FTZ Docket 61-2008, filed 10-28-08);                

                    Whereas, notice inviting public comment has been given in the                     **Federal Register**                     (73 FR 65582, 11-4-08) and the application has been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,                

Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the public interest;

Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders:

                    The application to expand and reorganize the subzone and to expand the scope of FTZ manufacturing authority within Subzone 119B, as described in the application and                     **Federal Register**                     notice, is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28.                

Signed at Washington, DC, February 5, 2010.

Ronald K. Lorentzen,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-4052 Filed 2-25-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
§ 520.2382 Thiabendazole and triclorfon. ( a ) *Specifications.* The drug contains 5 grams of thiabendazole with 4.5 grams of trichlorfon, or 20 grams of thiabendazole with 18 grams of trichlorfon.
( b ) *Sponsor.* See No. 017135 in § 510.600(c) of this chapter.
( c ) *Conditions of use in horses* — ( 1 ) *Amount.* Administer 2 grams of thiabendazole with 1.8 grams of trichlorfon per 100 pounds of body weight sprinkled on the animals' usual daily ration of feed, or may be mixed in 5 to 10 fluid ounces of water and administered by stomach tube or drench.
( 2 ) *Indications for use.* For the treatment and control of bots (*Gasterophilus* spp.), large strongyles (*Strongylus* spp.), small strongyles (genera *Cyathostomum, Cylicobrachytus,* *Craterostomum, Oesophagodontus,* *Poteriostomum*), pinworms (*Oxyuris* spp., *Strongyloides* spp.), and ascarids (*Parascaris* spp.).
( 3 ) *Limitations.* Do not use in horses intended for human consumption. Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian.
[40 FR 23071, May 28, 1975, as amended at 48 FR 48229, Oct. 18, 1983; 79 FR 28832, May 20, 2014. Redesignated at 84 FR 39183, Aug. 9, 2019. Redesignated at 88 FR 27699, May 3, 2023]
Exhibit 3-1
                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST
                                       OF
                              PSEG FUNDING TRUST II

      THIS CERTIFICATE OF TRUST of PSEG Funding Trust II (the "Trust"), dated as
of July 31,  2002,  is being  duly  executed  and filed by the  undersigned,  as
trustees,  to form a business  trust under the Delaware  Business  Trust Act (12
Del. C.ss.3801, et seq.) (the "Act").

            (i) Name. The name of the business trust being formed hereby is PSEG
Funding Trust II.

            (ii) Delaware Trustee.  The name and business address of the trustee
of the Trust in the State of  Delaware  are  Wachovia  Trust  Company,  National
Association, One Rodney Square, 920 King Street, Suite 102, Wilmington DE 19801.

            (iii) Counterparts. This Certificate of Trust may be executed in one
or more  counterparts,  all of which together shall  constitute one and the same
instrument.

            (iv) Effective Date. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective as
of its filing with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the trustees of the Trust, have
executed  this  Certificate  of Trust  as of the date  first  above  written  in
accordance with Section 3811(a) of the Act.

                                         WACHOVIA TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL
                                         ASSOCIATION, as Trustee

                                         By: /s/ AMY L. MARTIN
                                             -----------------------------------
                                         Name:   Amy L. Martin
                                         Title:  Assistant Vice President

                                         MORTON A. PLAWNER, as Trustee

                                         /s/ MORTON A. PLAWNER
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Morton A. Plawner
Exhibit 23

                              Accountants' Consent

The Board of Directors
Hardin Bancorp, Inc.:

We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the registration  statements on
Form S-8 of Hardin Bancorp,  Inc. of our report dated May 21, 1999,  relating to
the consolidated  balance sheets of Hardin Bancorp,  Inc. and subsidiaries as of
March 31, 1999 and 1998,  and the related  consolidated  statements of earnings,
stockholders'  equity  and cash  flows for each of the  years in the  three-year
period ended March 31, 1999,  which report  appears in the annual report on Form
10-KSB of Hardin  Bancorp,  Inc.  for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1999 filed
pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



/s/KPMG LLP
-----------
Kansas City, Missouri
June 28, 1999
(logo)CWCapital

ASSETMANAGEMENT

 

**Annual Statement asto Compliance**

**For the Period ofJanuary 1, 2018 to July 4, 2018**

** **

** **

**WFCM 2015-C30**

 

 

Inaccordance with Item 1123 of Regulation AB and with the requirements detailedin §11.12 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”) forthe above-mentioned CMBS pool, CWCapital Asset Management LLC (“CWCAM”),in its capacity as Special Servicer, is providing this Officer’s Certificatewith respect to the following:

 

(A)    a review of CWCAM’sactivities during the preceding calendar year or portion thereof (the “ReportingPeriod”) and of CWCAM’s performance under the Agreement has been made undersuch officer’s supervision; and

 

(B)    to the best of suchofficer’s knowledge, based on such review, CWCAM has fulfilled all itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period. 

 

 

Shouldyou have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.  

 

Sincerely,

CWCapitalAsset Management LLC

 

 

/s/ JamesP. Shevlin

JamesP. Shevlin

President/ChiefOperating Officer

 

 

7501Wisconsin Avenue | Suite 500 West | Bethesda, MD | 20814
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 7 (Tuesday, January 12, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 1566]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-394]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION

Information Security Oversight Office

32 CFR Part 2004

[NARA-09-0005]
RIN 3095-AB34


National Industrial Security Program Directive No. 1

AGENCY: Information Security Oversight Office, NARA.

ACTION: Proposed rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects the heading to a proposed rule 
published in the Federal Register of November 30, 2009, regarding the 
National Industrial Security Program Directive No. 1. This correction 
assigns a Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) number to the 
proposed rule for Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO) 
regulations and provides a new regulation identifier number (RIN).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laura McCarthy, 301-837-3023.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In proposed rule FR Doc. E9-28517, beginning 
on page 62531 in the issue of November 30, 2009, make the following 
corrections in the heading of the document.

Correction

    On page 62531, correct the docket number to read ``[ISOO-09-
0001]''and correct the RIN to read ``3095-AB63''.

    Dated: January 5, 2010.
Laura J. McCarthy,
Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2010-394 Filed 1-11-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7515-01-P
tss_Ex101



		

			Exhibit 10.1

		





		
			Total System Services, Inc. 
		

		
			Board of Directors Compensation for Non-Employee Directors 
		

		
			(Effective May 2017)  
		

		
			 
		

			
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						Cash Compensation

					
					
						  

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						Annual Board Retainer

					
					
						  

					
					
						$

					
85,000
					
					
						  

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						Annual Committee Member Retainers

					
					
						  

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						Audit Committee

					
					
						  

					
					
						$

					
15,000
					
					
						  

				
	
					
						Compensation Committee

					
					
						  

					
					
						$

					
10,000
					
					
						  

				
	
					
						Technology Committee

					
					
						  

					
					
						$

					
10,000
					
					
						  

				
	
					
						Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

					
					
						  

					
					
						$

					
7,500
					
					
						  

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						Annual Committee Chair Retainers*

					
					
						  

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						Audit Committee

					
					
						  

					
					
						$

					
15,000
					
					
						  

				
	
					
						Compensation Committee

					
					
						  

					
					
						$

					
10,000
					
					
						  

				
	
					
						Technology Committee

					
					
						  

					
					
						$

					
10,000
					
					
						  

				
	
					
						Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

					
					
						  

					
					
						$

					
7,500
					
					
						  

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						Annual Lead Director Retainer

					
					
						  

					
					
						$

					
22,500
					
					
						  

				



		
			 
		

			
					
						*

					
					
						Note: The committee chair receives both an annual committee member retainer and an annual committee chair retainer. 

				



		
			Equity Compensation 
		

		
			Annual equity award with a fixed value of $135,000, awarded in the form of fully vested stock options or in the form of fully vested shares or any combination thereof at the director’s choice.
Editorial Note on Part 864
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 864 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 864.9165 Blood establishment computer software and accessories. ( a ) *Identification.* Blood establishment computer software (BECS) is a device used in the manufacture of blood and blood components to assist in the prevention of disease in humans by identifying ineligible donors, by preventing the release of unsuitable blood and blood components for transfusion or for further manufacturing into products for human treatment or diagnosis, by performing compatibility testing between donor and recipient, or by performing positive identification of patients and blood components at the point of transfusion to prevent transfusion reactions. This generic type of device may include a BECS accessory, a device intended for use with BECS to augment the performance of the BECS or to expand or modify its indications for use.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls for these devices are: ( 1 ) Software performance and functional requirements including detailed design specifications (*e.g.,* algorithms or control characteristics, alarms, device limitations, and safety requirements).
( 2 ) Verification and validation testing and hazard analysis must be performed.
( 3 ) Labeling must include: ( i ) Software limitations;
( ii ) Unresolved anomalies, annotated with an explanation of the impact on safety or effectiveness;
( iii ) Revision history; and
( iv ) Hardware and peripheral specifications.
( 4 ) Traceability matrix must be performed.
( 5 ) Performance testing to ensure the safety and effectiveness of the system must be performed, including when adding new functional requirements (*e.g.,* electrical safety, electromagnetic compatibility, or wireless coexistence).
[83 FR 23217, June 18, 2018]
#### Dennis S. GARCIA, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, FAA, Respondents.

Appeal No. 85-1759.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 16, 1986.

*67Richard J. Leighton, Risa D. Sandler and Margaret S. Dailey, of Mayberry and Leighton, Washington, D.C., submitted for petitioner.

Richard K. Willard, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director and Sandra P. Spooner, Commercial Litigation Branch, Dept, of Justice, of Washington, D.C., submitted for respondents.

Before RICH and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and COWEN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner Garcia petitions from his removal for being AWOL during the Air Traffic Controller’s Strike. Petitioner had been on scheduled leave until August 10, 1981. On August 6, as a result of the strike situation, his supervisor called him at home and ordered him to report back to work the next morning. Petitioner did not follow that order. We *affirm*the decision removing petitioner from his job for being AWOL, his leave having been properly can-celled, *see Letenyei v. Dept. of Transportation, FAA,*767 F.2d 898 (Fed.Cir.1985), and even though he was not participating in the strike, because petitioner was aware of the agency’s operational emergency yet disobeyed the direct order given him the day before to return to work. *See Dewitt v. Department of the Navy,*747 F.2d 1442, 1444-45 (Fed.Cir.1984). The decision petitioned from is not arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, unsupported by substantial evidence, or otherwise not in accordance with law. 5 U.S.C. § 7703.

AFFIRMED.