alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016402EN.01003801.xml

| 31.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 402/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 402/38

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2016 — European Dynamics Luxembourg and Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission

(Case T-698/14) (1)

1

((Public service contracts - Public procurement procedure - External service provision for development, studies and support for information systems (ESP DESIS III) - Ranking of a tenderer in the cascade procedure - Obligation to state reasons - Abnormally low bids - Principle of free competition - Non-contractual liability))

(2016/C 402/42)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicants: European Dynamics Luxembourg SA (Ettelbrück, Luxembourg) and Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Sistimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (Athens, Greece) (represented initially by: V. Christianos, I. Ampazis and M. Sfyri, lawyers, and subsequently by: M. Sfyri, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Delaude and S. Lejeune, acting as Agents, and, initially, E. Petritsi, E. Roussou and K. Adamantopoulos, and, subsequently, E. Roussou and K. Adamantopoulos, lawyers)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Firstly, application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of the Commission’s decisions to rank in third and fourth positions under the cascade mechanism the bids made by the applicants for lots Nos 1 and 3 under open call for tenders No DIGIT/R2/PO/2013/029 — ESP DESIS III concerning ‘External service provision for development, studies and support for information systems’ (OJ 2013/S 19-0380314) and to exclude their bid for lot No 2 under that call for tenders and, secondly, application on the basis of Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for the loss allegedly suffered by the applicants.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders European Dynamics Luxembourg and Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Sistimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders European Dynamics Luxembourg and Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Sistimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 448, 15.12.2014.

1

---
J ~~Z~ D STq?.

~ iP YZ UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

qt PROt"

-G ~ 2 

### MAY 13 20""

OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION Mr. J.R. Stroble Director, National TRU Program Carlsbad Field Office U.S. Department of Energy P.O. Box 3090 Carlsbad, NM 88221

Dear Mr. Stroble:
We received your letter dated May 9, 20132, requesting the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) concurrence on the draft recertification and expansion memo to the certification of the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). The purpose of the memo is to expand the site's certification to add the characterization of summary category group S4000 soils and gravel which EPA approved on December 31, 2012. Based on our review, we concur with CBFO's draft recertification and expansion memo which will allow LANL-CCP to characterize contact-handled S4000 waste. The EPA limitations applicable to the characterization of CH and RH TRU waste are appropriately included in Attachment 4 of the draft recertification and expansion memo. The waste characterization equipment, procedures and processes included in the memo are consistent with EPA's existing approvals at the site.
Thank you for providing us with an opportunity to review the draft recertification and expansion memo for LANL-CCP. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me at (202) 343-9422 or Rajani Joglekar at (202) 343-9462.
Sincerely,

Edward Feltcorn Center for Waste Management and Regulations

Intemet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov Recycled/Recyclable 9 Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper

### cc: (Electronic Distribution)

Joe Franco, CBFO Marcus Pinzel, CBFO NTP Norma Castaneda, CBFO NTP Tom Morgan, CBFO NTP Site Documents, CBFO Tom Peake, EPA Raymond Lee, EPA
# C_2015046EN.01001602.xml

| 9.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/16

---

Appeal brought on 26 May 2014 by FTI Touristik GmbH against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 21 March 2014 in Case T-81/13 FTI Touristik GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

FTI Touristik GmbH

Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

(Case C-253/14 P)

(2015/C 046/22)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellant: FTI Touristik GmbH (represented by: A. Parr, Rechtsanwältin)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings:

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

By its order of 11 December 2014, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Sixth Chamber) dismissed the appeal and ordered the appellant to bear its own costs.

---
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00164-CV 

JAMES SCOTT TRIMM AND 

INGRID TRIMM

APPELLANTS

V.

U.S. BANK, NATIONAL 

ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE OF 

J.P. MORGAN MORTGAGE

ACQUISITION CORP. 2005 OPT1

APPELLEE 

------------

FROM THE 96TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 096-249211-10

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

On August 22, 2016, we notified appellants that their brief had not been 

filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. 

App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution 

unless appellants or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. 

R. App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.

Because appellants' brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for 

want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GABRIEL, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and SUDDERTH, J. 

DELIVERED: September 22, 2016
4-30-13 Line 3 Run 1 Temperature Data File Name: C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Documents\MDAS-PRO\Data\c1.MP_Lgr Recorder Start Time: 3/27/2013 7:33:32 AM Eastern Daylight Time Recorder Stop Time: 5/2/2013 9:03:32 AM Eastern Daylight Time Measurement Interval: 30Min Number of Measurements: 1732 Alarm Activated: False Printout Date: 5/2/2013 9:23:16 AM Eastern Daylight Time Logger Serial Number: 110405009 Initial Description: Alcoa Line 3 Final Comment: Tracking Number: 5068 Note: Data Format: Output All Measurements. DateTime Temperature

4/30/2013 10:03 91.4 4/30/2013 10:33 91.2 4/30/2013 11:03 92.6 4/30/2013 11:33 94.2 4/30/2013 12:03 95.8 4/30/2013 12:33100.4 4/30/2013 13:03101.6 4/30/2013 13:33 99.4 4/30/2013 14:03100.6 4/30/2013 14:33101.4 **AVG 96.86**
RMED International, Inc.
                                     Exhibit 11

The following  represents the  computation of per share earnings  reflecting the
assumption that the granted shares under the option plan will be exercised.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                           Three Months Ended                Nine Months Ended
                                                    ------------------------------    ------------------------------
                                                    September 30,    September 30,    September 30,    September 30,
                                                       2000              1999             2000             1999
                                                    ------------------------------    ------------------------------
<S>                                                  <C>             <C>               <C>              <C>
Net income (loss)                                    $  73,004       $ (119,350)       $   248,311      $   230,099
                                                     =========       ==========        ===========      ===========

Weighted average common shares outstanding           9,963,859        9,293,877          9,973,776        9,240,172

Common share equivalents relating to stock options          --               --              1,322        1,129,918
                                                     ---------       ----------        -----------      -----------

Adjusted common and common equivalent shares
         for computation                             9,963,859        9,293,877          9,975,098       10,370,090
                                                     =========       ==========        ===========      ===========

Net earnings per share:
         Basic                                       $    0.01       $    (0.01)       $      0.02      $      0.02
                                                     =========       ==========        ===========      ===========
         Diluted                                     $    0.01       $    (0.01)       $      0.02      $      0.02
                                                     =========       ==========        ===========      ===========
</TABLE>

         The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements
Opinion issued April 28, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-20-00142-CV

———————————

IN RE TEAM INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC., Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator Team Industrial Services, Inc. has filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus to obtain a continuance of the February 18, 2020 trial setting.1 On 

1 The underlying case is Kelli Most, Individually and as Personal Representative of 

the Estate of Jesse Henson, Tracy Dunnaway, Bailey Burchett, Individually and as 

Administrator of the Estate of Damien “Craig” Burchett, and Dalton Burchett v. 

Team Industrial Services, Inc., cause number 18-DCV-256883, pending in the 268th 

District Court of Fort Bend County, Texas, the Honorable O'Neil Williams 

presiding.
2

February 14, 2020, this Court issued an order staying the trial pending disposition of 

the petition.

Real party in interest, Kelli Most, Individually and as Personal Representative 

of the Estate of Jesse Henson, filed a response to the petition. Real party, Kelli Most 

and real party, Bailey Burchett, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of 

Damien “Craig” Burchett, and Dalton Burchett, filed a joint motion to dismiss the 

petition as moot.

We lift the stay and deny the petition. Any pending motions are dismissed as 

moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Lloyd, and Hightower.
§ 529.2503 Tricaine methanesulfonate. ( a ) *Specifications.* The drug is ethyl-*m*-amino-benzoate methanesulfonate.
( b ) *Sponsor.* See Nos. 050378 and 051212 in § 510.600(c) of this chapter.
( c ) *Conditions of use* — ( 1 ) *Amount.* It is used as follows: ( i ) *Fish.* The drug is added to ambient water at a concentration of from 15 to 330 milligrams per liter depending upon the degree of anesthetization or sedation desired, the species and size of the fish, and the temperature and softness of the water. Preliminary tests of solutions must be made with small numbers of fish to determine the desired rates of sedation or anesthesia and the appropriate exposure times for the specific lots of fish under prevailing conditions.
( ii ) *Amphibians and other aquatic coldblooded animals.* The drug is added to ambient water in concentrations of from 1:1000 to 1:20,000 depending upon species and stage of development.
( 2 ) *Indications for use.* For the temporary immobilization of fish, amphibians, and other aquatic coldblooded animals (poikilotherms) as an aid in handling during manual spawning (fish stripping), weighing, measuring, marking, surgical operations, transport, photography, and research.
( 3 ) *Limitations.* Do not use within 21 days of harvesting fish for food. Use in fish intended for food should be restricted to Ictaluridae, Salmonidae, Esocidae, and Percidae, and water temperature exceeding 10 °C (50 °F). In other fish and in coldblooded animals, the drug should be limited to hatchery or laboratory use.
[79 FR 10974, Feb. 27, 2014]
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 10.1

                     [DELOITTE TOUCHE TOHMATSU LETTERHEAD]


                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-97162 and 333-07946) of Deswell Industries, Inc. of our
report dated June 28, 2002, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of
Deswell Industries, Inc. for the year ended March 31, 2002.


/s/ DELOITTE TOUCHE TOHMATSU

Hong Kong
June 28, 2002
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JOSEPH JAMAL WALKER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

Nos. 4D16-3994, 4D16-4161

and 4D16-4253

[May 16, 2018]

Consolidated appeals from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial 

Circuit, Palm Beach County; Krista Marx, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 50-2010-

CF-014607B, 50-2011-CF-000626A and 50-2014-CF002429A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and J. Woodson Isom, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ilana Mitzner, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the convictions and sentences in all respects. We remand to 

the circuit court for correction of the written revocation order to conform 

to the court’s oral pronouncement. The written order contains a violation 

for failing to undergo a drug and alcohol evaluation; in its oral 

pronouncement, the court ruled that violation had not been established. 

The written order also contains a violation for committing the offense of 

possession of a firearm by a convicted felon; however, the state nolle 

prossed that count at sentencing after the court’s oral pronouncement. 

Affirmed and remanded for correction.

WARNER, GROSS and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### [*] CLARK *against*HILLYER and NERRIS.

OH CERTIORARI.

Reversal, a charge of merchandise per bill, insufficient.

The error relied on for the reversal of this judgment, was a defect in the copy of account rendered to the justice; which instead of giving the account at large, particularly setting out the items, was abridged in the following manner:

*Mr. M’ Whorter,*for the plaintiff in this court,

contended, *95“ that the copy of account required by the act of Assembly, called for the items of the account to be particularly set out, that the defendant might be apprised of the demand of the plaintiff.”

*Mr. Van Arsdale,*for the defendant in *certiorari,*

submitted to the court, whether the account filed, was not sufficiently set out; and the directions of the act complied with.

Kirkpatrick, C. J.

— Said that soon after the act passed, this question came before this court on a *certiorari;*that he himself was then of opinion, that the act was sufficiently complied with, by a general statement like the present, without giving the items of the account — but that his brethren, three in numbei’, (the court then consisting of four judges), were all of a contrary opinion; and that the course of decisions ever since, had been in conformity to their opinions, from which he was not now inclined to depart.

Rossell, J.

— Said that he thought it too strict a proceeding, to require the particular items of the account, [*] it was a strictness that the superior courts did [75] not require. That a declaration in this court did not contain the particular items of the account.

Pennington, J.

— It is true, a declaration in the courts pursuing the course of the common law, does not contain a particular specification of the items of an account; but in cases of assumpsit for merchandise, &c., the charge is general, for goods, wares and merchandise, sold and delivered. But the plaintiff is required in these courts, by positive law, to deliver to his defendant or his attorney, if required, before the plea pleaded, a copy of the account, or a bill of the particulars of the demand whereon the declaration is founded; and this to enable the defendant to plead and otherwise defend himself. This he is not entitled to in the justices’ courts. The copy of account called for in the act constituting courts for the trial of small causes, is a substitute for the bill of particulars, directed in the practice act, and ought to *96be equally minute and particular *•*the same reason subsisting in both cases.

By the Court. — Let the judgment be reversed.

Cited in *Carter*v. *Lackey, Spenc. 608.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                       2,021,125
<SECURITIES>                                   473,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  309,577
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,803,702
<PP&E>                                       8,088,723
<DEPRECIATION>                               (297,768)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,390,373
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          836,934
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                     2,141,735
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,189,453
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,390,373
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,912,314
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  644,142
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,268,172
<INCOME-TAX>                                   257,800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,010,372
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,010,372
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Preferred Voice, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Latif M. Nathani, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|                                            
|/s/    LATIF M. NATHANI                     
|Latif M. Nathani Principal Executive Officer
|July 14, 2004
# C_2015107EN.01003902.xml

| 30.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 107/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 107/39

---

Order of the General Court of 9 February 2015 — Spain v Commission

(Case T-657/14) (1)

(2015/C 107/52)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 380, 27.10.2014.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM IDS MANAGED
FUTURES II, L.P. FOR THE THIRD QUARTER OF 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       5,458,576
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,337
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,482,913
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,482,913
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          110,193
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,372,720
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,482,913
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             (423,620)
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  148,963
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (572,583)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (572,583)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (572,583)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (43.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (43.56)


</TABLE>