alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 73
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 73 appear at 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001.

§ 73.352 Paracoccus pigment. ( a ) *Identity.* ( 1 ) The color additive paracoccus pigment consists of the heat-killed, dried cells of a nonpathogenic and nontoxicogenic strain of the bacterium *Paracoccus carotinifaciens* and may contain added calcium carbonate to adjust the astaxanthin level.
( 2 ) Color additive mixtures for fish feed use made with paracoccus pigment may contain only those diluents that are suitable and are listed in this subpart as safe for use in color additive mixtures for coloring foods.
( b ) *Specifications.* Paracoccus pigment shall conform to the following specifications and shall be free from impurities, other than those named, to the extent that such impurities may be avoided by good manufacturing practice: ( 1 ) Physical state, solid.
( 2 ) Lead, not more than 5 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) (5 parts per million (ppm)).
( 3 ) Arsenic, not more than 2 mg/kg (2 ppm).
( 4 ) Mercury, not more than 1 mg/kg (1 ppm).
( 5 ) Heavy metals (as Pb), not more than 10 mg/kg (10 ppm).
( 6 ) Astaxanthin, not less than 1.75 percent.
( c ) *Uses and restrictions.* Paracoccus pigment may be safely used in the feed of salmonid fish in accordance with the following prescribed conditions: ( 1 ) The color additive is used to enhance the pink to orange-red color of the flesh of salmonid fish.
( 2 ) The quantity of astaxanthin in finished feed, from paracoccus pigment when used alone or in combination with other astaxanthin color additive sources listed in this part 73, shall not exceed 80 mg/kg (72 grams per ton) of finished feed.
( d ) *Labeling requirements.* ( 1 ) The labeling of the color additive and any premixes prepared therefrom shall bear expiration dates for the sealed and open container (established through generally accepted stability testing methods), other information required by § 70.25 of this chapter, and adequate directions to prepare a final product complying with the limitations prescribed in paragraph (c) of this section.
( 2 ) The presence of the color additive in finished fish feed prepared according to paragraph (c) of this section shall be declared in accordance with § 501.4 of this chapter.
( 3 ) The presence of the color additive in salmonid fish that have been fed feeds containing paracoccus pigment shall be declared in accordance with §§ 101.22(b), (c), and (k)(2), and 101.100(a)(2) of this chapter.
( e ) *Exemption from certification.* Certification of this color additive is not necessary for the protection of the public health, and therefore, batches thereof are exempt from the certification requirements of section 721(c) of the act.
[74 FR 58845, Nov. 16, 2009]
§ 821.20 Devices subject to tracking. ( a ) A manufacturer of any class II or class III device that fits within one of the three criteria within § 821.1(a) must track that device in accordance with this part, if FDA issues a tracking order to that manufacturer.
( b ) When responding to premarket notification submissions and premarket approval applications, FDA will notify the sponsor by issuing an order that states that FDA believes the device meets the criteria of section 519(e)(1) of the act and, by virtue of the order, the sponsor must track the device.
[67 FR 5951, Feb. 8, 2002]
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8), pertaining to the Anergen, Inc. 1988 Stock Option Plan, the Anergen, Inc.
1992 Consultant Plan, the Anergen, Inc. 1995 Director Plan and the Anergen, Inc.
1996 Stock Option Plan, of Corixa Corporation of our report dated February 3,
1999 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Corixa Corporation
included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

                                                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Seattle, Washington
October 21, 1999
Exhibit 32.1

# Written Statement of
the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350

Solely
for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned President and Chief Executive
Officer and Vice President Law/Finance and Secretary of Ladish Co., Inc. (the
Company), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Kerry L. WoodyKerry
L. WoodyPresident and Chief
Executive Officer

/s/ Wayne E. LarsenWayne
E. LarsenVice President
Law/Finance & Secretary

July 27, 2006
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Ian J. Harvie, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Exide Technologies;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying
officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and we have:



a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation
of internal control of financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|    |  |                                                                                       
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/    IAN J. HARVIE                                                                  
|    |  | Ian J. Harvie Interim Chief Financial Officer and Vice President, Corporate Controller



Date:
August 11, 2004
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002     I, Keith A. Meister, Principal Executive Officer of AmericanProperty Investors, Inc., the General Partner of American RealEstate Partners, L.P. (the “Registrant”), certify thatto the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the AmericanReal Estate Partners, L.P., quarterly report onForm 10-Q for theperiod ended March 31, 2006 of the Registrant (the“Report”):     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Registrant.     /s/ KEITH A. MEISTER   **Keith A. Meister**     Principal Executive Officer and     Vice Chairman of the Board of     American Property Investors, Inc.,     the General Partner of     American Real Estate Partners, L.P.Date: May 10, 2006
50
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION   EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  OF LADISH  CO.,  INC. AS OF AND FOR THE SIX
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENT.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         1,054
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  25,160
<ALLOWANCES>                                   300
<INVENTORY>                                    48,189
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               74,746
<PP&E>                                         86,675
<DEPRECIATION>                                 56,886
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 171,546
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          39,277
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       142
<OTHER-SE>                                     67,836
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   171,546
<SALES>                                        87,527
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               87,527
<CGS>                                          79,074
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3,579
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               170
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             342
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                4,702
<INCOME-TAX>                                   705
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            3,997
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3,997
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.27



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           5,076
<SECURITIES>                                     5,482
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,314
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,671
<PP&E>                                           6,771
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,687
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,291
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,685
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            51
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,447
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    23,291
<SALES>                                          3,347
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,808
<CGS>                                              540
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,441
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,584
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    937
<INCOME-TAX>                                       347
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                590
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       590
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11
        

</TABLE>
(logo) Rialto CAPITAL

 

2016 Annual Statement ofServicer Compliance (Item 1123)

 

 

Pooling and ServicingAgreement (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”) dated as of August1, 2015 by and among Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Securities Corp. asDepositor, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Associationas Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as Special Servicer, PentalphaSurveillance LLC as Operating Advisor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Associationas Certificate Administrator and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association asTrustee relating to the Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Securities Corp.,CSAIL 2015-C3 Commercial Mortgage Trust, Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates Series  2015-C3

 

(CSAIL 2015-C3)

 

 

The undersigned, a dulyauthorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the“Special Servicer”), except for the Charles River Plaza North WholeLoan, herein certifies to the following:

 

1.       All servicing activities and performanceof such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement areperformed on behalf of the Special Servicer.

 

2.       A review of the servicing activities andperformance by the Special Servicer for the period of January 1, 2016 toDecember 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”) in accordance with thePooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.

 

3.       To the best of my knowledge, based on suchreview, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theterms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects for theReporting Period and if there has been a failure to fulfill any suchobligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and statusthereof has been specifically identified herein.

 

 

Certified by: /s/ Adam Singer

Adam Singer, Managing Director

Date: March 1, 2017
#### § 814.114 Timeframes for reviewing an HDE.

Within 75 days after receipt of an HDE that is accepted for filing and to which the applicant does not submit a major amendment, FDA shall send the applicant an approval order, an approvable letter, a not approvable letter (under § 814.116), or an order denying approval (under § 814.118).

[63 FR 59221, Nov. 3, 1998]
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I, Thomas J. Shaw, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10KSB-A of Retractable Technologies, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations, and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the small business issuer and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation; 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any changes in the small business issuer’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the small businessissuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal controlsover financial reporting; and 

 

5. The small business issuer’s othercertifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financialinformation; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

 

Date:     September 10, 2004
cool_ex1068.htm

EXHIBIT 10.68

 

Cool Technologies, Inc. 

8875 Hidden River Parkway 

Tampa, Florida 33637 

 

February 16, 2017 

 

Robert Klimov 

Managing Partner 

Bellridge Capital, LLC 

515 E. Las Olas Boulevard Suite 120A 

Fort Lauderdale Florida 33301 

 

Re: 5% Convertible Notes 

 

Gentlemen: 

 

Reference is made to the Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of December 6, 2016 between Cool Technologies, Inc. and Bellridge Capital, LLC. (the “Agreement”), the 5% Convertible Notes issued thereunder (the “Notes”) and the other agreements entered into between the parties in connection therewith. Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Agreement. 

 

Pursuant to the Notes, the Company was to have effected a reverse split of its Common Stock (the “Reverse Split”). The Company has not effected the Reverse Split. Subject to the below, the Purchaser hereby waives the requirement to complete the Reverse Split. 

 

The Company agrees to by April 24, 2017, either (i) effect the Reverse Split such that there will be enough shares available for conversion of the Notes in such amounts as is required under the Notes or (ii) increase the authorized share capital of the Company n such amounts as is required under the Notes by amending its Articles of Incorporation (“Authorized Share Increase”). 

 

If either the Reverse Split or the Authorized Share Increase is not effected by April 24, 2017 it shall constitute an Event of Default under the Note. 

 

No other term or provision of the Transaction Documents shall be affected by this agreement other than as specifically provided for herein. 

 

 


	 	Cool Technologies, Inc.  	 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

		By:	
 
	



 

 

AGREED AND ACCEPTED: 

 


	Bellridge Capital, LLC 	
	 	 	 
	By:	

	
	
 
	
Robert Klimov 

Managing Partner
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19A1573. VICTOR CALLAHAN v. THE STATE.

Victor Callahan was convicted of kidnapping, armed robbery, and hijacking a

motor vehicle, and this Court affirmed his convictions on appeal. Callahan v. State,

250 Ga. App. 193 (550 SE2d 757) (2001). Callahan subsequently filed a pro se

motion alleging that his judgment of conviction is void because he was indicted, and

then reindicted, in two different terms of court by the same grand jurors. The trial

court denied the motion, and Callahan filed this appeal.

As the Supreme Court has made clear, a post-conviction motion seeking to

vacate an allegedly void criminal conviction is not one of the established procedures

for challenging the validity of a judgment in a criminal case, and an appeal from the

trial court’s ruling on such a petition should be dismissed. See Roberts v. State, 286

Ga. 532 (690 SE2d 150) (2010). Here, Callahan’s motion asserted that due to alleged

issues with his indictment and grand jury proceedings, his convictions should be

vacated. This is not a valid procedure for challenging the judgment in his criminal

case. Accordingly, Callahan’s appeal from the denial of his motion is hereby

DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

April 09, 2019

04/09/2019
Editorial Note on Part 866
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 866 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 866.5500 Hypersensitivity pneumonitis immunological test system. ( a ) *Identification.* A hypersensitivity pneumonitis immunological test system is a device that consists of the reagents used to measure by immunochemical techniques the immunoglobulin antibodies in serum which react specifically with organic dust derived from fungal or animal protein sources. When these antibodies react with such dusts in the lung, immune complexes precipitate and trigger an inflammatory reaction (hypersensitivity pneumonitis). Measurement of these immunoglobulin G antibodies aids in the diagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis and other allergic respiratory disorders.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).