alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7643 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the use of Department 

of Veterans Affairs work-study allowance to carry out casework, policy 

making, and oversight related to the activities of the Department at 

certain congressional offices. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 12, 2024 

Mr. TAKANO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the 

use of Department of Veterans Affairs work-study allowance to carry out casework, policy making, and oversight 

related to the activities of the Department at certain 

congressional offices. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Congressional 

5 Work Study Act of 2024’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 7643 IH

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZED ACTIVITIES IN CERTAIN CONGRES2 SIONAL OFFICES USING DEPARTMENT OF 

3 VETERANS AFFAIRS WORK-STUDY ALLOW4 ANCE. 

5 Section 3485(a)(5) of title 38, United States Code, 

6 is amended— 

7 (1) in subparagraph (K), by inserting ‘‘or at 

8 the offices of a committee of the Senate or House 

9 of Representatives on behalf of such committee’’ 

10 after ‘‘such Members’’; and 

11 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub12 paragraph: 

13 ‘‘(L) Activities supporting casework, policy 

14 making, and oversight related to the activities of the 

15 Department carried out at the offices of a committee 

16 of the Senate or House of Representatives, the Con17 gressional Research Service, the Government Ac18 countability Office, or the Congressional Budget Of19 fice.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Editorial Note on Part 864
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 864 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 864.1850 Dye and chemical solution stains. ( a ) *Identification.* Dye and chemical solution stains for medical purposes are mixtures of synthetic or natural dyes or nondye chemicals in solutions used in staining cells and tissues for diagnostic histopathology, cytopathology, or hematology.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). These devices are exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 864.9. These devices are also exempt from the current good manufacturing practice requirements of the quality system regulation in part 820 of this chapter, with the exception of § 820.180, with respect to general requirements concerning records, and § 820.198, with respect to complaint files.
[45 FR 60583, Sept. 12, 1980, as amended at 54 FR 25044, June 12, 1989; 66 FR 38789, July 25, 2001]
Editorial Note on Part 862
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 862 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 862.1510 Nitrite (nonquantitative) test system. ( a ) *Identification.* A nitrite (nonquantitative) test system is a device intended to identify nitrite in urine. Nitrite identification is used in the diagnosis and treatment of uninary tract infection of bacterial origin.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 862.9.
[52 FR 16122, May 1, 1987, as amended at 65 FR 2307, Jan. 14, 2000]
# C_2014372EN.01000302.xml

| 20.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 372/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 372/3

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 1 August 2014 — APEX GmbH Internationale Spedition v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Stadt

(Case C-371/14)

2014/C 372/05

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Finanzgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: APEX GmbH Internationale Spedition

Applicant:

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Stadt

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Is Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 260/2013 (1) of 18 March 2013 extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1458/2007 on imports of gas-fuelled, non-refillable pocket flint lighters originating in the People’s Republic of China to imports of gas-fuelled, non-refillable pocket flint lighters consigned from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, whether declared as originating in the Socialist Republic of Vietnam or not (OJ 2013 L 82 of 22.3.2013, pp. 10-17; ‘Regulation No 260/2013’) invalid because the anti-dumping duty introduced by Regulation (EC) No 1458/2007, and which was to be extended, was no longer in force at the time when Regulation No 260/2013 was adopted?
  If the answer to Question 1 is in the negative: |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 260/2013 (1) of 18 March 2013 extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1458/2007 on imports of gas-fuelled, non-refillable pocket flint lighters originating in the People’s Republic of China to imports of gas-fuelled, non-refillable pocket flint lighters consigned from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, whether declared as originating in the Socialist Republic of Vietnam or not (OJ 2013 L 82 of 22.3.2013, pp. 10-17; ‘Regulation No 260/2013’) invalid because the anti-dumping duty introduced by Regulation (EC) No 1458/2007, and which was to be extended, was no longer in force at the time when Regulation No 260/2013 was adopted?

1

If the answer to Question 1 is in the negative:

| 2. | Is Regulation No 260/2013 invalid because there is no evidence of circumvention, within the meaning of Article 13(1) of Regulation No [1225/2009], of the measure imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1458/2007 (2)? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is Regulation No 260/2013 invalid because there is no evidence of circumvention, within the meaning of Article 13(1) of Regulation No [1225/2009], of the measure imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1458/2007 (2)?

2

---

(1)  OJ 2013 L 82, p. 10.

1

(2)  Council Regulation (EC) No 1458/2007 of 10 December 2007 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of gas-fuelled, non-refillable pocket flint lighters originating in the People’s Republic of China and consigned from or originating in Taiwan and on imports of certain refillable pocket flint lighters originating in the People’s Republic of China and consigned from or originating in Taiwan (OJ 2007 L 326, p. 1).

2

---
#### Philips *v.*Philips.

No. 8484.

February 17, 1932.

Per Curiam.

The trial judge did not err in overruling the demurrers to the petition.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Atkinson, J., who dissents.*

*419
      *J. E. Chapman*and *A. W. & John G.*Cozart, for plaintiff in error.

*George C.*Palmer, contra.
# C_2015096EN.01002002.xml

| 23.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/20

---

Order of the General Court of 27 January 2015 — UNIC v Commission

(Case T-338/14) (1)

1

((Action for annulment - Joint actions to promote sustainable development economically, socially and environmentally in developing countries - Generalised tariff preferences granted to treated and partly treated leather originating from India, Pakistan and Ethiopia - Rejection of the application for a temporary withdrawal of the benefit of generalised preferences - Measure not subject to review - Inadmissibility))

(2015/C 096/26)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Unione nazionale industria conciaria (UNIC) (Milan, Italy) (represented by: A. Fratini and M. Bottino, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. De Meester and D. Recchia, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission’s letter of 19 March 2014 addressed to the applicant and rejecting its request for initiation of a temporary withdrawal procedure in respect of the generalised preferential arrangements granted to the Republic of India, the Islamic Republic of Pakistan and the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia with regard to raw hides and semi-manufactured leather goods.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is rejected as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is rejected as inadmissible.

| 2. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for intervention made by the Republic of Italy. |
| --- | --- |

2.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for intervention made by the Republic of Italy.

| 3. | The Unione nazionale industria conciaria (UNIC) shall bear its own costs and those incurred by the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Unione nazionale industria conciaria (UNIC) shall bear its own costs and those incurred by the Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 212, 7.7.2014.

1

---
United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 12, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-10190

 

LUCINDA G MILLER; ELAINE KING-MILLER

Plaintiffs-Appellees

versus

TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER

Defendant-Appellant

- - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

North District of Texas

- - - - -

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion May 13, 2003, 5 Cir., 2003, _____F.3d____)

(August 12, 2003)

BEFORE: KING, Chief Judge, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES,

SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS,

BENAVIDES, STEWART, DENNIS, CLEMENT and PRADO, Circuit

Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested

a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of

the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a

rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the

court en banc. No decision has yet been made with respect to
oral argument. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for

the filing of supplemental briefs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF VOLUNTEER BANCORP, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,583,960
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             4,841,622
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 17,108,656
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       1,085,104
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         1,083,238
<LOANS>                                     48,470,206
<ALLOWANCE>                                    660,336
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              78,246,383
<DEPOSITS>                                  69,087,389
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,216,679
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            806,611
<LONG-TERM>                                  3,265,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,390
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,865,314
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              78,246,383
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              4,141,546
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,112,803
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               202,199
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             5,461,548
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,764,396
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,071,411
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        2,390,137
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  215,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               8,342
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              2,034,140
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                353,912
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     216,775
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   216,775
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.64
<LOANS-NON>                                     70,159
<LOANS-PAST>                                   186,477
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               457,432
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   17,730
<RECOVERIES>                                     5,634
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              660,336
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           660,336
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
---

Exhibit 13.B

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal period ended May 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ezequiel Sirotinsky, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: 1.
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materials respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Ezequiel Sirotinsky 
    Ezequiel Sirotinsky
    (Principal financial and accounting officer) Dated: September 11, 2012 The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.


---
#### United States Savings and Loan Company *v*. Brock et al.

[No. 18,855.

Filed Nov. 27, 1900.

.Rehearing denied Feb. 22, 1901.]

From the Delaware Circuit Court.

*Reversed.*

*■ A. M. Wagner, J. Bingham,*and *J. Long,*for appellant.

*R. Warner*and *A. W. Brady,*for appellees.

Hadley, J.

The facts, the pleadings, rulings of the court, and questions reserved and presented to this court, are the same in all material respects as those invol ved and determined in *United States, etc., Co.*v. *Rider,*155 Ind. 704, and upon the authority of that case, and *International, etc., Assn.*v. *Wall,*153 Ind. 554, this case is reversed.

Judgment reversed, and cause remanded, with' instructions to sustain the demurrer to the second paragraph of answer.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-20737 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus WANDA T. GIANCATERINO, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-99-CR-599-1

-------------------- June 14, 2001 Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM: * Wanda Giancaterino appeals her jury conviction and sentence for manufacturing, transferring, possessing, and concealing counterfeit U.S. currency in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 471-73. For the first time on direct appeal, she asserts that she received ineffective assistance of counsel at trial. The only argument Giancaterino has briefed concerns the effect her counsel’s alleged ineffectiveness had on her sentence. Direct appeal of her conviction is therefore waived. See YoheyNo. 00-20737 -2- v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993); Fed. R. App. P. 28(a)(9). We address the merits of Giancaterino’s ineffectiveness argument, despite being raised for the first time on appeal, because we find this to be one of the “rare” cases where the record allows a fair evaluation of the claim’s merits. See United States v. Navejar , 963 F.2d 732, 735 (5th Cir. 1992); United States v. Higdon , 832 F.2d 312, 313-14 (5th Cir. 1987). In order to establish ineffective assistance of counsel, Giancaterino must show that (1) her counsel's performance was deficient in that it fell below an objective standard of reasonableness, and (2) the deficient performance prejudiced her defense. Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 689-94 (1984) Giancaterino fails to meet either requirement. The record establishes that her counsel’s decision to proceed to trial after the Government refused a conditional guilty plea was a strategic judgment call. The record is devoid of evidence to rebut the “strong presumption that counsel’s conduct [fell] within the wide range of reasonable professional assistance.” See id. at 689. Giancaterino furthermore concedes, and the record supports, that she cannot establish the requisite prejudice because it is purely speculative whether the district court would have awarded a two-level decrease for acceptance of responsibility under U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1 had she pleaded guilty. See id. at 694. (defendant must show to a reasonable probability that the result of the proceeding would have been different). AFFIRMED.
| (logo)ncb

National Cooperative Bank

 

2011 Crystal Drive

Suite, 800

Arlington, VA 22202 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

# February 6,2018

 

 

Wells Fargo CommercialMortgage Securities, Inc. as Depositor

Attn: AJ Sfarra

375 Park Avenue, 2ndFloor

J0127-023

New York, NY 10152

 

RE:     Annual Statement as to Compliance

           WFCM 2015 C30

 

Dear Sir/Madam:

 

Inaccordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement entered into in connectionwith the issuance of the Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series2015-C30, as an authorized officer of National Cooperative Bank, N.A., formerlyNCB, FSB (the “NCB Special Servicer”), I hereby certify pursuant to Section11.12 thereof that:

 

a.       A review of the activitiesof the NCB Special Servicer during the preceding calendar year (the “ReportingPeriod”) and of its performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement hasbeen made under my supervision.

 

b.      To the best of myknowledge, based on these reviews, the NCB Special Servicer has fulfilled allobligations under this agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

Please note that the annualfinancial statement will be sent under separate cover on or before March 31,2018.

 

 

Best regards,

/s/ Karyn Mann

Karyn Mann

Senior Vice President,Investor Compliance

National Cooperative Bank,N.A.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE



I, James R. Tennant, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Home Products International, Inc., certify that:



|(1) | The Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 26, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Ace of 1934; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the foregoing report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Home Products International, Inc.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ JAMES R. TENNANT                             
|James R. Tennant                                 
|Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
|Dated: August 10, 2004                           



The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Home
Products International, Inc. and will be retained by Home Products International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
38697.

#### ROBERTS v. THE STATE.

Decided February 22, 1961.

*W. George Thomas,*for plaintiff in error.

*George D. Lawrence, Solicitor-General,*contra.

Jordan, Judge.

This case is controlled by the decision in *Dempsey v. State,*ante, and the cases therein cited.

In the instant case the bill of exceptions shows that three separate indictments against the defendant, charging him with larceny from the house, were tried together; that there were three separate verdicts of guilty, and three judgments. The defendant seeks by one bill of exceptions to have all three of these judgments set aside. Under the well settled rule established by the authorities cited above, this court is without jurisdiction to entertain such a bill of exceptions.

*Writ of error dismissed.*

*Townsend, P. J., Carlisle and Frankum, JJ., concur.*