### 85560 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 228 / Monday, November 28, 2016 / Notices

Total estimated burden: 14 hours (per year). Burden is defined at 5 CFR 1320.03(b).

Total estimated cost: $1,038 (per year), includes $0 annualized capital or operation & maintenance costs.

Changes in the estimates: There is no increase in hours in the total estimated respondent burden compared with the ICR currently approved by OMB.

Courtney Kerwin, Director, Regulatory Support Division.
[FR Doc. 2016–28516 Filed 11–25–16; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**[FRL–9955–63-Region 9]**

**Notice of Approval of Clean Air Act Prevention of Significant Deterioration**  **Permit for Ocotillo Power Plant**

**AGENCY :**  United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Notice of final agency action.

**SUMMARY :**  This notice announces that the Maricopa County Air Quality Department (MCAQD) issued a final permit decision to Arizona Public Service (APS) for a major modification of a Clean Air Act Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) permit (Permit No. PSD16–01). The PSD permit decision authorizes a major modification at the Ocotillo Power Plant, located in Tempe, Arizona, primarily for the purposes of constructing five simple cycle natural gas-fired combustion turbines, including ancillary equipment. The MCAQD is authorized to issue PSD permit decisions pursuant to a delegation agreement with the EPA, in which the MCAQD ‘‘stands in the shoes’’ of the EPA when administering certain elements of the PSD permitting program. This MCAQD-issued PSD permit decision is considered to be a federally-issued PSD permit decision, and serves as a final agency action by the EPA.

**DATES :**  The MCAQD issued a final PSD permit decision for the Ocotillo Power Plant on September 9, 2016. The permit became effective on that date. Pursuant to section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7607(b)(1), judicial review of this final permit decision, to the extent it is available, may be sought by filing a petition for review in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit within 60 days of November 28,
2016.

**ADDRESSES :**  Documents relevant to the above-referenced permit are available for public inspection during normal business hours at the following addresses:

(1) Maricopa County Air Quality Department, 1001 North Central Avenue, Suite 124, Phoenix, Arizona 85004. To arrange for viewing of these documents, please call (602) 506–6010 or visit online at http:// www.maricopa.gov/aq/contact

_ us/ public

_records/Default.aspx. (2) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California 94105–3901. To arrange for viewing of these documents, call Eugene Chen at (415) 947–4304, chen.eugene@epa.gov. Due to building security procedures, at least 48 hours advance notice is required.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Eugene Chen, EPA Region 9, (415) 947– 4304, chen.eugene@epa.gov. Anyone who wishes to review the EPA Environmental Appeals Board’s (EAB) decision described below or documents in the EAB’s electronic docket for its decision can obtain them at http:// www.epa.gov/eab/.

**NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION AND**
**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  The MCAQD issued a final PSD permit to APS on March 22, 2016, authorizing a major modification to the Ocotillo Power Plant. EPA regulations at 40 CFR 124.19 provided an opportunity for administrative review by the EPA’s EAB of this initial permit decision.

The EPA’s EAB received one petition for review of the permit, and on September 1, 2016, the EAB issued an Order denying the petition for review. See In re Arizona Public Service Company Ocotillo Power Plant, PSD Appeal No. 16–01 (EAB, September 1, 2016) (Order Denying Review). Following the EAB’s action, pursuant to 40 CFR 52.21(u) and the MCAQD’s PSD delegation agreement with the EPA, the MCAQD issued a final permit decision on September 9, 2016. All conditions of PSD Permit No. PSD16–01, as initially issued by the MCAQD on March 22, 2016, were final and effective as of September 9, 2016.

Dated: November 3, 2016. Elizabeth Adams, Acting Director, Air Division, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2016–28435 Filed 11–25–16; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION**  **AGENCY**

**[EPA–HQ–OPP–2016–0078; FRL–9955–34– OEI]** 

**Information Collection Request Submitted to OMB for Review and**  **Approval; Comment Request; Pesticide Environmental Stewardship**  **Program Annual Measures Reporting**

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Notice.

**SUMMARY :**  The Environmental Protection Agency has submitted an information collection request (ICR), ‘‘Pesticide Environmental Stewardship Program Annual Measures Reporting’’ (EPA ICR No. 2415.03, OMB Control No. 2070– 0188) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. ). This is a proposed extension of the ICR, which is currently approved through November 30, 2016. Public comments were previously requested via the Federal Register (81 FR 15105) on March 21, 2016 during a 60-day comment period. This notice allows for an additional 30 days for public comments. A fuller description of the ICR is given below, including its estimated burden and cost to the public. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

**DATES :**  Additional comments may be submitted on or before December 28,
2016.

**ADDRESSES :**  Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID Number EPA– HQ–OPP–2016–0078, to (1) EPA online using www.regulations.gov (our preferred method), by email to OPP

_ Docket@epa.gov, or by mail to: EPA Docket Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460, and (2) OMB via email to oira

_submission@omb.eop.gov. Address comments to OMB Desk Officer for EPA.

EPA’s policy is that all comments received will be included in the public docket without change including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Lily G. Negash, Office of Pesticide Programs,