alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Jerryl L. Keane *v.*John D. Cucurello et al.

*Allan B. Johnson,*for the appellees (defendants).

*Jerryl L. Keane,*pro se, the appellant (plaintiff).

Argued November 4

decided November 5, 1969

The motion by the defendants to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in Fairfield County is granted.

The appellant filed a motion for reargument which was denied.
§ 582.1199 Calcium gluconate. ( a ) *Product.* Calcium gluconate.
( b ) *Conditions of use.* This substance is generally recognized as safe when used in accordance with good manufacturing or feeding practice.
---

EXHIBIT 13.A



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the
Annual Report of Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal period ended May 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joao Manuel , President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| |    |  |                                                                                                                                                      
| | -- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and    
| |    |  |                                                                                                                                                      
| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materials respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                               | 
|------------------------------ | 
|/s/ Joao Manuel                | 
|Joao Manuel                    | 
|(principal executive officer ) | 



Dated:  November 6, 2009





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.





---
Editorial Note on Part 866
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 866 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 866.3140 *Corynebacterium* spp. serological reagents. ( a ) *Identification. Corynebacterium* spp. serological reagents are devices that consist of antisera conjugated with a fluorescent dye used to identify *Corynebacterium* spp. from clinical specimens. The identification aids in the diagnosis of disease caused by bacteria belonging to the genus *Corynebacterium* and provides epidemiological information on diseases caused by these microorganisms. The principal human pathogen of this genus, *Corynebacterium diphtheriae,* causes diphtheria. However, many other types of corynebacteria form part of the normal flora of the human respiratory tract, other mucus membranes, and skin, and are either nonpathogenic or have an uncertain role.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 866.9.
[47 FR 50823, Nov. 9, 1982, as amended at 65 FR 2311, Jan. 14, 2000]
# C_2016048EN.01004701.xml

| 8.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 48/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/47

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2015 — CareAbout v OHIM — Florido Rodríguez (Kerashot)

(Case T-356/14) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark Kerashot - Earlier national figurative mark K KERASOL - Relative grounds for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Partial refusal of registration by the Board of Appeal))

(2016/C 048/53)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: CareAbout GmbH (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: P. Mes, C. Graf von der Groeben, G. Rother, J. Bühling, A. Verhauwen, J. Künzel, D. Jestaedt, M. Bergermann, J. Vogtmeier and A. Kramer, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Palmero Cabezas, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: José Luis Florido Rodríguez (Seville, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 24 March 2014 (Case R 1569/2013-4), relating to opposition proceedings between José Luis Florido Rodriguez and CareAbout GmbH.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders CareAbout GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders CareAbout GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 253, 4.8.2014.

1

---
ENCLOSURE 1

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

STATE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD

REGULATIONS FOR THE CONTROL AND ABATEMENT OF AIR POLLUTION

PROVISIONS AFFECTED

REVISION A10

CONCERNING

AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS

(9VAC5 CHAPTER 30)

Adoption Date: June 4, 2010

Effective Date: August 18, 2010

The following table lists the specific provisions of the attached regulations that will be 

used to implement the State Implementation Plan (SIP). A copy of the actual regulation 

submitted for approval and incorporation by reference into the Virginia SIP is included 

in Enclosure 2.

CHAPTER 20 GENERAL PROVISIONS

PART I Administrative

9VAC5-20-21 Documents incorporated by reference (modified)

CHAPTER 30 AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS

9VAC5-30-70 Oxides of nitrogen with nitrogen dioxide as the indicator (modified)

TEMPLATES\SIP-REG\REG01

SIP\NONATTN PLANS\2011\A10-SIP-1.DOC
38944, 38958.

38956, 38957.

#### WOOD *et al.*v. OLSON (two cases). WOOD *et al.*v. WALTON (two cases).

Decided September 6, 1961.

*322*Anderson & Sanders, W. J. Neville, Cohen Anderson, Faye Sanders, Kirk McAlpin, Frank W. Seiler, Bouhan, Lawrence, Williams, Levy & McAlpin,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Lanier ■& Lanier, Robert S. Lanier,*contra.

Hall, Judge.

When facts alleged as constituting gross negligence are such that there is room for difference of opinion between reasonable men as to whether or not negligence can be inferred, and if so whether in degree the negligence amounts to gross negligence, the right to draw the inference is within the exclusive province of the jury. *Fletcher v. Abbott,*92 Ga. App. 364 (88 SE2d 445); *Parker v. Bryan,*93 Ga. App. 88, 96 (91 SE2d 49); *Youngblood v. Ruis,*96 Ga. App. 283, 290 (99 SE2d 714); *Blunt v. Spears,*93 Ga. App. 623, 632 (92 SE2d 573); *Austin v. Smith,*96 Ga. App. 659, 663 (101 SE2d 169). The above allegations do not show these to be plain and indisputable cases in which the court may solve the question as a matter of law. We cannot say that the jury could not consider that the facts alleged amounted to a lack of even slight care for the guest passenger. *Smith v. Hodges,*44 Ga. App. 318 (161 SE 284); *Austin v. Smith,*supra; *Parker v. Johnson,*97 Ga. App. 261, 262 (102 SE2d 917).

The law requires that, unless the pleaded facts *demand*an inference of gross negligence, the petition of a guest passenger to withstand general demurrer must allege that the facts amount to gross negligence. The case of *McBee v. Williamson,*96 Ga. App. 859 (101 SE2d 910), cited by defendants, so holds, and it is distinguished from the present case in that the allegations there did not meet this requirement.

The strongest case relied on by the defendants, to support the contention that the allegations set out above could not be considered gross negligence, is *Tucker v. Andrews,*51 Ga. App. 841 (181 SE 673), where it was held error to overrule the defendant’s motion for nonsuit. The reasons stated for that decison are that the only proof showing negligence was that the host driver’s *323attention was distracted for not more than three seconds by an incident in the back seat where small children were riding, and there was nothing which indicated an indifference of the host driver to the duty owed the guest.

The overruling of defendant’s general demurrers was not error.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Felton, C. J., and Bell, J., concur.*
EXHIBIT 11 - CALCULATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE




                                  MICROAGE, INC
                     NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE CALCULATION
                                 (in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                Quarter ended                   26 weeks ended
                                                     -------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                        May 4,           April 28,         May 4,          April 28,
                                                         1997              1996             1997              1996
                                                     --------------    --------------   --------------   ---------------
<S>                                                  <C>               <C>              <C>              <C>   
Primary
   Weighted average common shares                           15,476            15,025           15,395            14,982
   Dilutive effect of stock options and warrants               540               269              806               166

       Weighted average common and common            --------------    --------------   --------------   ---------------
           equivalent shares outstanding - primary          16,016            15,294           16,201            15,148

Fully Diluted (1)

   Weighted average shares from primary
       calculation                                          16,016            15,294           16,201            15,148
   Additional dilutive effect of stock options
       and warrants                                             54                59                -               149

       Weighted average common and common            --------------    --------------   --------------   ---------------
           equivalent shares outstanding - fully diluted    16,070            15,353           16,201            15,297

Net income                                                  $6,003            $3,102          $10,671            $4,745

Net income per common and common equivalent share:

           Primary                                          $ 0.37            $ 0.20          $  0.66            $ 0.31
           Fully Diluted                                    $ 0.37            $ 0.20          $  0.66            $ 0.31
</TABLE>


(1)  Fully diluted share  information is presented in accordance with Regulation
     S-K of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934.  The  amounts  of per  share
     earnings on the fully diluted basis are not required to be presented in the
     consolidated  statements of income under the provisions of APB No. 15 since
     the additional dilution is less than 3%.
# C_2015213EN.01004401.xml

| 29.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 213/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 213/44

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 18 May 2015 — Pohjanmäki v Council

(Case F-44/14) (1)

1

((Civil service - Officials - Promotion - Consideration of comparative merits - Respective roles of the Appointing Authority and of the JCC - Absence of staff reports - Failure by members of the JCC to consult staff reports - Compatibility of the functions of the rapporteur with the JCC and of the former assessor - Manifest error of assessment - Seniority in grade - Level of responsibilities exercised - Duty of care))

(2015/C 213/71)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Jaana Pohjanmäki (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: M. Velardo, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer, E. Rebasti and M. Veiga, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

The application, first, to annul the Council’s decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 13 and, second, to award damages for the non-material harm allegedly suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1) | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action;

| 2) | Declares that Ms Pohjanmäki is to bear half of her own costs; |
| --- | --- |

2)

Declares that Ms Pohjanmäki is to bear half of her own costs;

| 3) | Declares that the Council of the European Union is to bear its own costs and to pay half of the costs incurred by Ms Pohjanmäki. |
| --- | --- |

3)

Declares that the Council of the European Union is to bear its own costs and to pay half of the costs incurred by Ms Pohjanmäki.

---

(1)  OJ C 212, 7/7/2014, p. 46.

1

---
##### 



Exhibit (32)(b)

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350
(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Republic Bancorp Inc.
(the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that the
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 13, 2003
    
    /s/ Thomas F. MenacherName: Thomas F. MenacherTitle: Executive Vice President, Treasurer
         and Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification (i) accompanies the filing and is being furnished
solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and (ii) will not be deemed filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the
liability of that section.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Republic Bancorp Inc.
and will be retained by Republic Bancorp Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Subsidiaries of Registrant	               Exhibit 21


TP Acquisition Corp., a Texas corporation

Get Real, Inc., a Delaware corporation

Texas Taco Cabana, L.P., a Texas limited partnership

T. C. Management Inc., a Delaware corporation

T.C Lease Holdings III, V and VI, Inc., a Texas corporation

Taco Cabana Multistate, Inc., a Delaware corporation

Colorado Cabana, Inc., a Colorado corporation

Taco Cabana Atlanta, Inc., a Delaware corporation

Taco Cabana Investments, Inc., a Delaware corporation

Taco Cabana Management, Inc., a Texas corporation
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection
with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended May 31, 2020 of SavMobi Technology Inc., a Nevada
corporation (the "Company"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Transition Report"), I, Poh Kee Liew, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.The
Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and



2.The information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operation of the Company.



|Date: November  6, 2020 | By: | /s/ Gim Hooi Ooi        | 
|----------------------- | --- | ----------------------- | 
|                        |     | Gim Hooi Ooi            | 
|                        |     | Chief Financial Officer |
From: Brian Glover [bglover@environcorp.com]

Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 7:08 PM

To: Shepherd, Lorinda

Cc: Fortin, Kelly; Michael Carbon; Jill Webster (Jill_Webster@fws.gov); Kjersti Seim (Statoil); Donald Evans (Statoil); Kyle Heitkamp
Subject: Statoil Additional Information

- Developer Cement Unit Engines Hours of
Operation

Attachments: Statoil Additional Information (2013

- 09

- 17).pdf

Categories: OCS

Lori,

Please find attached additional information to be incorporated into Statoil’s pending p ermit number

OCS

- EPA

- R4012. Specifically, Statoil requests the hours of operation be increased for the Maersk Developer (Developer) Cement Unit Engines 1 and 2 (CMU

- 1 and CMU

- 2) from 120 hours per year to 300 hours per year (combined). The proposed chang e results in minimal increases in annual emissions, and has no impact on the PSD applicability analysis, BACT analysis, or air quality analysis for the project as

described further in the attached submittal.

Thank you for your attention to this matter an d please let us know if you have any questions or need any additional information.

Brian

Brian Glover | Senior Manager ENVIRON International Corporation 8235 YMCA Plaza Drive | Suite 300 Baton Rouge, LA 70810 T: +1 225 408 2741 | F: +1 225 408 2747 | M: +1 225 252 6562 bglover@environcorp.com



### This message contains information that m ay be confidential, privileged or otherwise protected by law from disclosure. It is intended for the exclusive use of the Addressee(s). Unless you are the addressee or authorized agent of the addressee, you may not review, copy, distribute or disclose

to a nyone the message or any information contained within. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender by electronic reply to email@environcorp.com and immediately delete all copies of the message.
Editorial Note on Part 73
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 73 appear at 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001.

§ 73.1162 Bismuth oxychloride. ( a ) *Identity.* ( 1 ) The color additive bismuth oxychloride is a synthetically prepared white or nearly white amorphous or finely crystalline, odorless powder consisting principally of BiOCl.
( 2 ) Color additive mixtures for drug use made with bismuth oxychloride may contain only those diluents that are suitable and that are listed in this subpart as safe in color additive mixtures for coloring externally applied drugs.
( b ) *Specifications.* The color additive bismuth oxychloride shall conform to the following specifications and shall be free from impurities other than those named to the extent that such other impurities may be avoided by good manufacturing practice: Volatile matter, not more than 0.5 percent. Lead (as Pb), not more than 20 parts per million. Arsenic (as As), not more than 3 parts per million. Mercury (as Hg), not more than 1 part per million. Bismuth oxychloride, not less than 98 percent.
( c ) *Uses and restrictions.* The color additive bismuth oxychloride may be safely used in coloring externally applied drugs, including those intended for use in the area of the eye, in amounts consistent with good manufacturing practice.
( d ) *Labeling.* The color additive and any mixture prepared therefrom intended solely or in part for coloring purposes shall bear, in addition to any information required by law, labeling in accordance with the provisions of § 70.25 of this chapter.
( e ) *Exemption from certification.* Certification of this color additive is not necessary for the protection of the public health, and therefore batches thereof are exempt from certification pursuant to section 721(c) of the act.
[42 FR 52394, Sept. 30, 1977]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             205
<SECURITIES>                                     2,929
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,100
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,234
<PP&E>                                          43,408
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,956
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  30,686
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          596,658
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          739,696
<PREFERRED>                                     28,923
<COMMON>                                    21,297,570
<OTHER-SE>                                   (565,972)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    30,686
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,297
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7767 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7767

To amend the Uniform Code of Military Justice to expand the definition 
  of aiding the enemy to include the provision of military education, 
                military training, and tactical advice.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 21, 2024

 Mr. Luttrell (for himself, Mr. Deluzio, Ms. Slotkin, and Mr. Strong) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Uniform Code of Military Justice to expand the definition 
  of aiding the enemy to include the provision of military education, 
                military training, and tactical advice.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Safeguarding Tactics and Operational 
Procedures from Enemies Act of 2024'' or the ``STOP Enemies Act of 
2024''.

SEC. 2. AIDING THE ENEMY DEFINITION FOR PURPOSES OF THE UNIFORM CODE OF 
              MILITARY JUSTICE.

    Section 903b(2) of title 10, United States Code (article 103b(2) of 
the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is amended by inserting 
``provides military education, military training, or tactical advice 
to,'' after ``gives intelligence to,''.
                                 <all>
```