Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 42 / Thursday, March 4, 2010 / Notices 9955 

et seq.), and Secretary of Labor’s Order 

No. 5–2007 (72 FR 31160). 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 26th day of 

February 2010. 

David Michaels, 

Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational 

Safety and Health. 

[FR Doc. 2010–4555 Filed 3–3–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–26–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Labor Surplus Area Classification 

Under Executive Orders 12073 and 

10582 

AGENCY: Employment and Training 

Administration, Labor. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The purpose of this notice is 

to update the 2010 Labor Surplus Areas 

annual list published in the Federal 

Register, Vol. 74, No. 209, Friday, 

October 30, 2009, pages 56217–56239. 

DATES: Effective Date: The update of the 

annual list of labor surplus areas is 

effective immediately for all states, the 

District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Samuel Wright, Office of Workforce 

Investment, Employment and Training 

Administration, 200 Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Room S–4231, 

Washington, DC 20210. Telephone: 

(202) 693–2870 (This is not a toll-free 

number). 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For 

supplementary, eligibility, classification 

procedures and petition for exceptional 

circumstances procedure information 

refer to the original 2010 Labor Surplus 

Area list at http:// 

edocket.access.gpo.gov/2009/pdf/E9- 

26165.pdf. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 25th day of 

February 2010. 

Jane Oates, 

Assistant Secretary for Employment and 

Training Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2010–4465 Filed 3–3–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FT–P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

[Docket No. 50–416; NRC–2010–0082] 

Entergy Operations, Inc.; Grand Gulf 

Nuclear Station, Unit 1; Environmental 

Assessment and Finding of No 

Significant Impact 

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission (NRC) is considering 

issuance of an exemption, pursuant to 

Title 10 of the Code of Federal 

Regulations (10 CFR) section 73.5, 

‘‘Specific exemptions,’’ from the 

implementation date for certain new 

requirements of 10 CFR part 73, 

‘‘Physical protection of plants and 

materials,’’ for Facility Operating 

License No. DPR–46, issued to Entergy 

Operations, Inc. (Entergy, the licensee), 

for operation of the Grand Gulf Nuclear 

Station, Unit 1 (GGNS), located in 

Claiborne County, Mississippi. 

Therefore, as required by 10 CFR 51.21, 

the NRC performed an environmental 

assessment. Based on the results of the 

environmental assessment, the NRC is 

issuing a finding of no significant 

impact. 

Environmental Assessment 

Identification of the Proposed Action 

The proposed action would exempt 

Entergy from the required 

implementation date of March 31, 2010, 

for several new requirements of 10 CFR 

part 73. Specifically, Entergy would be 

granted an exemption from being in full 

compliance with certain new 

requirements contained in 10 CFR 73.55 

by the March 31, 2010, deadline. 

Entergy has proposed an alternate full 

compliance implementation date of 

March 31, 2011, 1 year beyond the date 

required by 10 CFR part 73. The 

proposed action, an extension of the 

schedule for completion of certain 

actions required by the revised 10 CFR 

part 73, does not involve any physical 

changes to the reactor, fuel, plant 

structures, support structures, water, or 

land at the Entergy site. 

The proposed action is in accordance 

with the licensee’s application dated 

January 14, 2010, as supplemented by 

letters dated January 18 and February 4, 

2010. 

The Need for the Proposed Action 

The proposed action is needed to 

provide the licensee with additional 

time to perform the required upgrades to 

the Entergy security system due to 

resource and logistical impacts of the 

spring 2010 refueling outage and other 

factors, such as limited vendor 

resources. 

Environmental Impacts of the Proposed 

Action 

The NRC has completed its 

environmental assessment of the 

proposed exemption. The staff has 

concluded that the proposed action to 

extend the implementation deadline 

would not significantly affect plant 

safety and would not have a significant 

adverse effect on the probability of an 

accident occurring. 

The proposed action would not result 

in an increased radiological hazard 

beyond those previously analyzed in the 

environmental assessment and finding 

of no significant impact made by the 

Commission in promulgating its 

revisions to 10 CFR part 73 as discussed 

in a Federal Register notice dated 

March 27, 2009 (74 FR 13926). There 

will be no change to radioactive 

effluents that affect radiation exposures 

to plant workers and members of the 

public. Therefore, no changes or 

different types of radiological impacts 

are expected as a result of the proposed 

exemption. 

The proposed action does not result 

in changes to land use or water use, or 

result in changes to the quality or 

quantity of non-radiological effluents. 

No changes to the National Pollution 

Discharge Elimination System permit 

are needed. No effects on the aquatic or 

terrestrial habitat in the vicinity of the 

plant, or to threatened, endangered, or 

protected species under the Endangered 

Species Act, or impacts to essential fish 

habitat covered by the MagnusonSteven’s Act are expected. There are no 

impacts to the air or ambient air quality. 

There are no impacts to historical and 

cultural resources. There would be no 

impact to socioeconomic resources. 

Therefore, no changes to or different 

types of non-radiological environmental 

impacts are expected as a result of the 

proposed exemption. 

Accordingly, the NRC concludes that 

there are no significant environmental 

impacts associated with the proposed 

action. In addition, in promulgating its 

revisions to 10 CFR part 73, the 

Commission prepared an environmental 

assessment and published a finding of 

no significant impact [Part 73, Power 

Reactor Security Requirements, 74 FR 

13926 (March 27, 2009)]. 

The NRC staff’s safety evaluation will 

be provided in the exemption that will 

be issued as part of the letter to the 

licensee approving the exemption to the 

regulation, if granted. 

Environmental Impacts of the 

Alternatives to the Proposed Action 

As an alternative to the proposed 

actions, the NRC staff considered denial 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES