alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**MAC R1204-0109062 Old Annapolis RoadColumbia, MD 21045Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. 

1585 Broadway

New York, New York 10036

 

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2015-C24, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-C24

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b)  To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

March 1, 2016

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
39003.

#### LIGHT v. THE STATE.

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

1. The defendant, on trial for the offense of driving an automobile under the influence of intoxicating liquors, commenced his statement to the jury with the words: “Well, gentlemen of the jury, this is my first time to ever be on the stand for anything like this.” For the expressed purpose of impeaching the defendant, and over the objection that it placed his character in issue when the defendant himself had not done so, the State introduced the defendant’s conviction five years previously of the same offense together with his plea of guilty in that case. The defendant sought, by the above quoted excerpt of his statement, to convey to the jury that he had never been charged with the offense of driving under the influence, and the record of the previous indictment together with the plea of guilty was properly allowed in evidence for the purpose of discrediting the defendant’s statement. “ 'A party to a case has the right to introduce all competent, relevant, and material evidence, either to prove the main issue involved, or to discredit the evidence of a witness for the opposite party.’ *Tiller v. State,*111 Ga. 840 (36 SE 201). Accordingly, on the trial of a criminal case the State may introduce any competent, relevant, and material evidence for the purpose of disproving the contention of the defendant, or for the purpose of dis*840crediting his defense, and it affords no valid ground of objection that such evidence may tend incidentally to put the defendant’s character in issue. *Smith v. State,*148 Ga. 467 (96 SE 1042).’’ *Owensby v. State,*149 Ga. 19 (1) (98 SE 552). Accordingly, the trial court did not err in admitting such evidence over objection nor in overruling the defendant’s motion for a mistrial made after such evidence was introduced.

Decided October 24, 1961

Rehearing denied November 27, 1961.

*Frank B. Stow, Robert E. Andrews,*for plaintiff in error.

*Jeff C. Wayne, Solicitor-General, Sidney 0. Smith, Jr.,*contra.

2. Special grounds 4 and 5 assign error on two excerpts from the court’s charge dealing with the subject .of impeachment. Such excerpts, when considered in connection with the other portions of the charge on the same subject matter do not show any error.

3. The statement by the court in his instructions that witnesses are to be believed “unless impeached in some manner prescribed by law or otherwise discredited in your judgment” is not an expression of opinion by the court that the defendant’s character has been placed in issue. Likewise the statement of the court that “you are not concerned with the punishment because *it*is a misdemeanor and the punishment is a matter for the court to determine” does not appear to be an expression of opinion that the defendant was guilty, since “it” would reasonably be understood to refer to the crime charged in the indictment, not to the guilt or innocence of the accused. Accordingly, special grounds 3 and 6 are without merit.

The trial court did not err in overruling defendant’s motion for new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Frankum and Jordan, JJ., concur.*
Editorial Note on Part 862
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 862 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 862.1210 Creatine test system. ( a ) *Identification.* A creatine test system is a device intended to measure creatine (a substance synthesized in the liver and pancreas and found in biological fluids) in plasma, serum, and urine. Measurements of creatine are used in the diagnosis and treatment of muscle diseases and endocrine disorders including hyperthyroidism.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9.
[52 FR 16122, May 1, 1987, as amended at 53 FR 21449, June 8, 1988; 66 FR 38787, July 25, 2001]
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In the Interest of X.R.L., S.J.S., and Z.N.S., 

Children

No. 06-14-00090-CV

Appeal from the 307th District Court of 

Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 2013-

2155-DR). Opinion delivered by Justice 

Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant has adequately indicated her inability to pay costs of appeal. 

Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED APRIL 1, 2015

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
#### Bell and Stanton, Inc. *v.*Robert Laughlin et al.

*Burton M. Weinstein,*in support of the motion.

*Stuart I. Levin*and *Ira B. Charmoy,*in opposition.

Submitted July 7

decided July 16, 1969

The motion by the defendants for permission to file an unprinted brief in the appeal from the Superior Court in Fairfield County is denied.
# C_2016364EN.01004901.xml

| 3.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 364/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 364/49

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 20 July 2016 — Gaj v Commission

(Case F-43/14) (1)

((Civil service - Officials - Pensions - Transfer of national pension rights - Proposal concerning additional pensionable years - Act not having an adverse effect - Application for a decision not going to the substance of the case - Article 83 of the Rules of Procedure - Action in part inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law - Article 81 of the Rules of Procedure))

(2016/C 364/62)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Wanda Gaj (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by: J. Currall and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents, and subsequently by: G. Gattinara and F. Simonetti, acting as Agents)

Subject matter of the case

Application for annulment of the decision to credit the applicant’s pension in the European Union’s pension scheme pursuant to the new GIPs relating to Articles 11 and 12 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations and the decision of 19 August 2013 which closes the file concerning the transfer of the applicant’s pension rights acquired under the Caisse Nationale d’Assurance Vieillesse des Travailleurs Salariés (CNAVTS) (National Old-Age Insurance Fund for Employees).

Operative part of the order

| 1) | The action is dismissed as in part inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded. |
| --- | --- |

1)

The action is dismissed as in part inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.

| 2) | Wanda Gaj is to bear her own costs and is ordered to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Wanda Gaj is to bear her own costs and is ordered to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 292, 1.9.2014, p. 61.

---
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed January 4, 2023

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D22

- 797 Lower Tribunal No. 22

- 8708 CC

________________ 

### Karina Jimenez , Petitioner ,
vs. 

### Martha Gutierrez, Respondent

.

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari from the C ounty Court for Miami

- Dade County, Diana Gonzalez

- Whyte , Judge. Karina Jimenez , in proper person

. Martha Gutierrez , in proper person

.
Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and LINDSEY and GORDO , JJ. GORDO, J

.2 We treat Appellant’s appeal of the trial court’s order denying an emergency motion to stay a writ of possession as a petition for writ of certiorari. See Super Prods., LLC v. Intracoastal Env’t, LLC , 252 So. 3d 329, 331 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018) (“Orders staying proceedings are reviewable by certiorari.”) ; see also Bimini Properties, Inc. v. Puff or Sip Hookah Lounge & Liquor Store, LLC , 343 So. 3d 1249, 1251 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022) ( “ I n th ese circumstance s , we exercise our authority under Florida Rule of Appellate Pr ocedure 9.040(c) and treat the notice of appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari.” ) ; Benihana of Tokyo, Inc. v. Benihana, Inc. , 129 So. 3d 1153, 1154 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) ( “This Court has certiorari jurisdiction to review a trial court ’ s non - final order denying a motion for stay.” ) (quoting Sorena v. Gerald J. Tobin, P.A. , 47 So. 3d 875, 877 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010) ). Finding the trial court did not depart from the essential requirements of law, we deny the petition. Denied.
#### People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nelson L. Bonds, Defendant-Appellant.

Gen. No. 52,646. (Abstract of Decision.)

First District, Second Division.

April 1, 1969.

Gerald W. Getty, Public Defender of Cook County, of Chicago (James J. Doherty, Assistant Public Defender, of counsel), for appellant; Edward V. Hanrahan, State’s Attorney of Cook County, of Chicago (Elmer C. Kissane and James B. Haddad, Assistant State’s Attorneys, of counsel), for appellee.

Opinion by

JUSTICE BURKE.

Not to be published in full.
Editorial Note on Part 862
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 862 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 862.1377 Urinary homocystine (nonquantitative) test system. ( a ) *Identification.* A urinary homocystine (nonquantitative) test system is a device intended to identify homocystine (an analogue of the amino acid cystine) in urine. The identification of urinary homocystine is used in the diagnosis and treatment of homocystinuria (homosystine in urine), a heritable metabolic disorder which may cause mental retardation.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAir Traffic Management TestBed Simulation Architect: User's GuideThe Air Traffic Management (ATM) TestBed is a Platform as a Service that is being developed by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) to help design, configure, integrate, run, and monitor air traffic simulations. The platform provides cloud services including back-end big-data analytics tools, on-demand computing resource management, data storage, and communication middleware. The ATM TestBed reduces the time to test concepts and technologies, supports interactions among various concepts such as human-in-the-loop and automation-in-the-loop simulations, and enables collaborative simulations by sharing technologies and tools in the ATM community. The Simulation Architect application provides a graphical user interface tool for designing traffic scenarios and simulations using blocks representing components and links representing message channels linking them. This guide describes a high-level user interface design of Simulation Architect and provides information for a new user to compose traffic scenarios and simulations.Document ID20190004900Acquisition SourceAmes Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsLai, Chok Fung*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredMay 2, 2019Publication DateApril 1, 2019Subject CategoryAircraft Communications And NavigationReport/Patent NumberARC-E-DAA-TN67877NASA/TM-2019-220196Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.KeywordsSoftware User GuideScenario GenerationAir Traffic SimulationAvailable DownloadsNameType20190004900.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 82.6 Certifiable mixtures. ( a ) A batch of a mixture which contains no straight color listed in subpart C or D may be certified for use in food, drugs and cosmetics, if: ( 1 ) Each coal-tar color used as an ingredient in mixing such batch is from a previously certified batch and such color has not changed in composition in any manner whatever since such previous certification, except by mixing into such batch of mixture;
( 2 ) Each diluent in such batch of mixture is harmless and suitable for use therein; and
( 3 ) No diluent (except resins, natural gum, pectin and, in the case of mixtures which are aqueous solutions or aqueous pastes, sodium benzoate in a quantity of not more than 1 ⁄ 10 of 1 percent) in such mixture is a nonnutritive substance, unless such mixture is for external application to shell eggs, or for use in coloring a food specified in the requests for certification of such batch submitted in accordance with § 80.21 of this chapter, and such diluent, in the usual process of manufacturing such food, is removed and does not become a component of such food.
( b ) A batch of a mixture which contains no straight color listed in subpart D, or which contains a diluent not permitted by paragraph (a)(3) of this section, may be certified in accordance with the provisions of this part, for use only in drugs and cosmetics, if: ( 1 ) Each coal-tar color used as an ingredient in mixing such batch is from a previously certified batch and such color has not changed in composition in any manner whatever since such previous certification, except by mixing into such batch of mixture.
( 2 ) Each diluent in such batch of mixture is harmless and suitable for use therein.
( c ) A batch of a mixture which contains a straight color listed in subpart D may be certified in accordance with the provisions of this part, for use only in externally applied drugs and cosmetics, if: ( 1 ) Each coal-tar color used as an ingredient in mixing such batch is from a previously certified batch and such color has not changed in composition in any manner whatever since such previous certification, except by mixing into such batch of mixture; and
( 2 ) Each diluent in such batch of mixture is harmless and suitable for use therein.
Editorial Note on Part 864
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 864 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 864.8185 Calibrator for red cell and white cell counting. ( a ) *Identification.* A calibrator for red cell and white cell counting is a device that resembles red or white blood cells and that is used to set instruments intended to count red cells, white cells, or both. It is a suspension of particles or cells whose size, shape, concentration, and other characteristics have been precisely and accurately determined.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 864.9.
[45 FR 60634, Sept. 12, 1980, as amended at 84 FR 71800, Dec. 30, 2019]
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/gpo120967 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                         Jan-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                          Dec-31-1999
<CASH>                                                    442,394
<SECURITIES>                                               32,715
<RECEIVABLES>                                           1,599,715
<ALLOWANCES>                                               25,000
<INVENTORY>                                             1,814,339
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        4,710,479
<PP&E>                                                  2,537,618
<DEPRECIATION>                                            352,161
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          7,347,371
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   5,698,921
<BONDS>                                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                           0
<PREFERRED>                                                     0
<COMMON>                                                   96,094
<OTHER-SE>                                               (135,828)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            7,347,371
<SALES>                                                15,620,052
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       15,620,052
<CGS>                                                   9,387,080
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          15,567,890
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           81,667
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        303,918
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          (145,567)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      (145,567)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                 0
<CHANGES>                                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                             (145,567)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                  (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                (.02)


</TABLE>
§ 701.1 Misbranding. ( a ) Among representations in labeling of a cosmetic which render such cosmetic misbranded is a false or misleading representation with respect to another cosmetic or a food, drug, or device.
( b ) The labeling of a cosmetic which contains two or more ingredients may be misleading by reason (among other reasons) of the designation of such cosmetic in such labeling by a name which includes or suggests the name of one or more but not all such ingredients, even though the names of all such ingredients are stated elsewhere in the labeling.
### CMP-5

Revised: May 10, 2004 

## San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Supplemental Application Form



# Conservation Management Practices: DRY BEANS, CEREAL GRAINS, SAFFLOWER, WHEAT, AND BARLEY

Farm Name: CMP Plan Years: to

Maximum Crop Acreage:

Fallow Acreage Last Planted in Dry Beans, Cereal Grains, Safflower, Wheat, or Barley:

Land Preparation/

Cultivation Select at least one of the following CMPs. Note: 100% of the maximum crop acreage must be covered by the selected CMPs. Bed/Row Size or Spacing, ac Mulching, ac Chemigation/Fertigation, ac Multiple CMPs in Another Category Combined Operations, ac Night Farming, ac Conservation Irrigation, ac Precision Farming (GPS), ac Conservation Tillage, ac Transgenic Crops, ac Equipment Change/Tech. Improvements, _____ ac Other (approved on a case-by-case basis), ac Please describe the specifics of the practice(s) chosen above:



### Harvest Select at least one of the following CMPs. Note: 100% of the maximum crop acreage must be covered by the selected CMPs.
Baling/Large Balers, ac Multiple CMPs in Another Category Combined Operations, ac Night Harvesting, ac Equipment Change/Tech. Improvements, ac Shuttle System, ac Green Chop, _____ ac Other (approved on a case-by-case basis), ac Please describe the specifics of the practice(s) chosen above:



### Other Select at least one of the following CMPs. Note: 100% of the maximum crop acreage must be covered by the selected CMPs.
Application Efficiencies, ac Mulching, ac Baling/Large Balers (crop residue), ac No Burning, ac Bulk Materials Control Surface Roughening, ac Multiple CMPs in Another Category Transgenic Crops, ac Conservation Irrigation, ac Wind Barrier, ac Integrated Pest Management (IPM), ac Other (approved on a case-by-case basis), ac Irrigation Power Units

Please describe the specifics of the practice(s) chosen above: CMP

5
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.2

                             PAGEMART WIRELESS, INC.
                    COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (LOSS)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                          THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
                                                        ----------------------------------------
                                                         NUMBER         PERCENT       EQUIVALENT
                                                        OF SHARES     OUTSTANDING       SHARES
                                                        ---------     -----------       ------
<S>                                                       <C>              <C>        <C>      
COMMON STOCK
   From Founders' Stock                                  2,300,000       100.00%       2,300,000
   Stock Options Exercised                                 595,983        93.47%         557,058
   Preferred Stock Converted to Common Stock            15,310,943       100.00%      15,310,943
   1994 Common Stock Offerings                          11,242,857       100.00%      11,242,857
   1995 Common Stock Offerings                           4,323,874       100.00%       4,323,874
   1996 Common Stock Offering                            6,000,000       100.00%       6,000,000
   Employee Stock Purchase Plan Shares Issued               31,275         1.09%             340
                                                        ----------                   -----------
                                                        39,804,932                    39,735,072

WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING                                                   39,735,072

NET LOSS                                                                            ($12,865,000)

NET LOSS PER SHARE                                                                        ($0.32)
                                                                                     ===========
</TABLE>