alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Home Products International, Inc.
 (the  "Company") on  Form 10-Q for  the period ended  September 27, 2003  as
 filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on November 11, 2003,  I,
 James R. Tennant, Chief Executive Officer  and Chairman of the Board of  the
 Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
 section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.


 /s/ JAMES R. TENNANT
 --------------------
 James R. Tennant
 Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
 November 11, 2003


 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
 provided to Home Products International, Inc.  and will be retained by  Home
 Products International, Inc.  and furnished to  the Securities and  Exchange
 Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                         15,028
<SECURITIES>                                   1,950
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               16,978
<PP&E>                                         22,768
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 19,634,396
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,856,844
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       20,936,613
<OTHER-SE>                                     (124,800)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   19,634,396
<SALES>                                        13,261
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               13,261
<CGS>                                          12,528
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  12,528
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               653,704
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (768,124)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                23,000
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (745,124)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.01)




</TABLE>
Searched for **http://www.abmc.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.abmc.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
#### § 822.27 If I go out of business, what must I do?

You must notify us within 30 days of the date of your decision to close your business. You should provide the expected date of closure and discuss your plans to complete or terminate postmarket surveillance of your device. You must also identify who will retain the records related to the surveillance (described in subpart G of this part) and where the records will be kept.
EXHIBIT 32

ORTHOMETRIX, INC.
FORM 10-KSB DECEMBER 31, 2007

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Orthometrix, Inc., (the ‘‘Company’’), on Form 10-KSB for the annual period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 20, 2008


/s/ Reynald G. Bonmati
Reynald G. Bonmati
Chief Executive OfficerDate: March 20, 2008


/s/ Neil H. Koenig
Neil H. Koenig
Chief Financial Officer


---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                          10,580
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,056
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    223,369
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,995
<PP&E>                                          12,752
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,357
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 259,006
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,500
<BONDS>                                        100,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,500
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   259,006
<SALES>                                         80,900
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                80,900
<CGS>                                           66,145
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   78,471
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,315
<INCOME-TAX>                                       828
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,487
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .17
        

</TABLE>
# C_2016222EN.01001301.xml

| 20.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/13

---

Judgment of the General Court of 3 May 2016 — Iran Insurance v Council

(Case T-63/14) (1)

((Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation - Freezing of funds - Plea of illegality - Article 46(2) of Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 - Article 215 TFEU - Article 20(1)(c) of Decision 2010/413/CFSP, as amended by Article 1(7) of Decision 2012/35/CFSP - Article 23(2)(d) of Regulation No 267/2012 - Fundamental rights - Articles 2 TEU, 21 TEU and 23 TEU - Articles 17 and 52 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights - Error of assessment - Equal treatment - Non-discrimination - Principle of sound administration - Obligation to state reasons - Misuse of powers - Legitimate expectations - Proportionality))

(2016/C 222/14)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Iran Insurance Company (Tehran, Iran) (represented by: D. Luff, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: I. Rodios and M. Bishop, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre and D. Gauci, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application firstly for annulment, under Article 263 TFEU and Article 275 TFEU, of Council Decision 2013/661/CFSP of 15 November 2013 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2013 L 306, p. 18) and of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1154/2013 of 15 November 2013 implementing Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2013 L 306, p. 3), in so far as they concern the applicant, and secondly for a declaration, under Article 277 TFEU, of the inapplicability as regards the applicant of Article 20(1)(c) of Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP of 26 July 2010 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Common Position 2007/140/CFSP (OJ 2010 L 195, p. 39) as amended by Article 1(7) of Council Decision 2012/35/CFSP of 23 January 2012 (OJ 2012 L 19, p. 22) and of Article 23(2)(d) and Article 46(2) of Council Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 of 23 March 2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 (OJ 2012 L 88, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Iran Insurance Company to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Iran Insurance Company to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 78, 15.3.2014.

---
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

					NOS. 2-04-568-CR

						2-04-569-CR

LYNN LEWIS FUNK						       	APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	----------

	FROM THE 211TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	We have considered “Appellant’s Withdrawal of Notice of Appeal.”  The motion complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).  No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.  See id.; Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

								PER CURIAM

PANEL F:	CAYCE, C.J.; GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: March 2, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                      15,027,703
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            11,365,546
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  8,559,720
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      40,307,056
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        39,852,557
<LOANS>                                    115,230,319
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,219,629
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             196,052,710
<DEPOSITS>                                 175,127,797
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,056,801
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,053,707
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,024,433
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,789,972
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             196,052,710
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              8,780,954
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            2,114,330
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               409,135
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            11,304,419
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           4,212,094
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,261,157
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        7,043,262
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  156,479
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 121
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              5,181,662
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,017,611
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   3,017,611
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,014,190
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .90
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .88
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
§ 803.30 If I am a user facility, what reporting requirements apply to me? ( a ) You must submit reports to the manufacturer or to us, or both, as specified in paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this section as follows: ( 1 ) *Reports of death.* You must submit a report to us as soon as practicable but no more than 10 work days after the day that you become aware of information, from any source, that reasonably suggests that a device has or may have caused or contributed to the death of a patient of your facility. You must also submit the report to the device manufacturer, if known. You must submit the information required by § 803.32. Reports sent to the Agency must be submitted in accordance with the requirements of § 803.12(b).
( 2 ) *Reports of serious injury.* You must submit a report to the manufacturer of the device no later than 10 work days after the day that you become aware of information, from any source, that reasonably suggests that a device has or may have caused or contributed to a serious injury to a patient of your facility. If the manufacturer is not known, you must submit the report to us. You must report information required by § 803.32. Reports sent to the Agency must be submitted in accordance with the requirements of § 803.12 (b).
( b ) *What information does FDA consider “reasonably known” to me?* You must submit all information required in this subpart C that is reasonably known to you. This information includes information found in documents that you possess and any information that becomes available as a result of reasonable followup within your facility. You are not required to evaluate or investigate the event by obtaining or evaluating information that you do not reasonably know.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-1203

SARA MUSSIE,

Petitioner,

versus

U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE;

JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A-72-415-605)

Submitted: July 20, 2001 Decided: August 1, 2001

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Diane McHugh-Martinez, LAW OFFICE OF MCHUGH-MARTINEZ, Washington,

D.C., for Petitioner. Stuart E. Schiffer, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Margaret J. Perry, Senior Litigation Counsel, Julia K.

Doig, Office of Immigration Ligitation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Sara Mussie, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for

review of a final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board)

denying her motion to reopen deportation proceedings based on a

claim for protection under the United Nations Convention Against

Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or

Punishment.

Mussie contends that the Board abused its discretion in finding that she failed to establish a prima facie case that it is more

likely than not that she would suffer torture if returned to either

Germany or Ethiopia. See Stewart v. INS, 181 F.3d 587, 595 (4th

Cir. 1999); 8 C.F.R. § 208.16(c)(2) (2001). We have reviewed the

administrative record and the Board’s decision and find no abuse of

discretion in its refusal to grant the motion to reopen. See 8

C.F.R. § 208.18(b)(2)(ii).

Accordingly, we affirm the Board’s denial of relief. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Editorial Note on Part 862
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 862 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 862.1120 Blood gases (PCO2, PO2) and blood pH test system. ( a ) *Identification.* A blood gases (PCO2, PO2) and blood pH test system is a device intended to measure certain gases in blood, serum, plasma or pH of blood, serum, and plasma. Measurements of blood gases (PCO2, PO2) and blood pH are used in the diagnosis and treatment of life-threatening acid-base disturbances.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7802 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7802

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 400 Whitehead Street in Key West, Florida, as the ``Jimmy Buffett 
                        Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 22, 2024

Mr. Gimenez (for himself, Mr. Dunn of Florida, Mrs. Cammack, Mr. Posey, 
 Mr. Webster of Florida, Mr. Bilirakis, Mr. Scott Franklin of Florida, 
 Mr. Mast, Mr. Diaz-Balart, and Ms. Salazar) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                             Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 400 Whitehead Street in Key West, Florida, as the ``Jimmy Buffett 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JIMMY BUFFETT POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 400 Whitehead Street in Key West, Florida, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Jimmy Buffett Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Jimmy 
Buffett Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
following Registration Statements:



|(1) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-13405) pertaining to the Amended and Restated 1995 Equity Participation Plan of Ambassadors International, Inc.,
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-81023) pertaining to the Amended and Restated 1995 Equity Participation Plan of Ambassadors International, Inc.,
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(3) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-104280) pertaining to the Amended and Restated 1995 Equity Participation Plan of Ambassadors International, Inc., and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(4) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-129404) pertaining to the 2005 Incentive Award Plan of Ambassadors International, Inc.;
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

of our report dated March 15, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Ambassadors International, Inc. incorporated herein by
reference, our report dated March 15, 2007, with respect to Ambassadors International, Inc. managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting of Ambassadors International, Inc., included herein.



|                   |  |  |  |                      
|------------------ |  |  |  | ---------------------
|                   |  |  |  | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
|                   |  | 
|Irvine, California |  |  |  |                      
|March 15, 2007     |  |  |  |