CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD 

### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 1

(Electronic Format) I. GENERAL INFORMATION District: Great Basin Unified Air Pollution Control District Rule No(s): 216* (Adopted 10/15/79), 405, 307 & 502Date adopted/Amended/Rescinded: July 7, 2005 Note: The District has two rules that are numbered 216. One was adopted on 3/10/76 and the other on 10/15/79. The revision on July 7, 2005 was made to Rule 216 that was adopted on 10/15/79. Rule Title(s): 216 -New Source Review Requirements for Determining Impact on Air Quality Secondary Sources; 405 -Exceptions; 307 -Conservation Management Practices & Plan Fees; 502 -Conservation Management Practices Date Submitted to ARB: July 26, 2005 If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended (or Adopt ed): Rule 216 - Adopted 10/15/79; Rule 405 -Revised 11/07/01 Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? Yes No ( If No, do not complete remainder of form) District Contact: Duane OnoPhone Number: 760 - 872 - 8211 E - mail Address: duaneono@yahoo.com Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: New Rule Amended Rule Rule changes a re intended to comply with Senate Bill 700 requiring the District to adopt rules requiring BACM and BARCT for applicable agricultural practices and it removes agricultural exemptions for permit requriements

. Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Check): ROG (NOx) SO2 (CO) PM TAC (name): II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when impleme nted, will result in quantifiable changes in emissions. Attach reference(s) for emission factor(s) and other information. Attach calculation sheet showing how the emission information provided below was determined . Net Effect on Emissions: Increase Decrease N/A Emission Reduction Commitment in SIP for this Source Category: Inventory Year Used to Calculate Changes in Emissions: Area Affected: Future Year Control Profile Estimate (Provide information on as many years as possible) :CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD 

### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 2

(Electronic Format)

Baseline Invento ry in the SIP for the Control Measure: Mono Basin - 0 T/Y; Coso Junction -0 T/Y; Owens Valley -1 T/Y; Mammoth Lakes -0 T/Y. Emissions Reduction Commitment in the SIP for the Control Measure: 0 for all areas Revised Ba seline Inventory (if any): Revised Emission Reduction Estimate (if developed): Note that the district’s input to the Rule Evaluation Form will not be used as input to the ARB’s emission forecasting and planning. III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS Districtis: Attainment Nonattainment Split Approximate Total Number of Small (<100 TPY) Sources Affected by this Amendment: 15 Percent in Nonattainment Area: 15 % Number of Larg e ( > 100 TPY) Sources Controlled: 0 Percent in Nonattainment Area: 0 % Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) of Large ( > 100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule (Attach additional sheets as necessary) : IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY Does the Rule Include Emission Limits that are Continuous? Yes No If Yes, Those Limits are in Section(s) of the Rule. Other Methods in the Rule for Achie ving Emission Reductions are: Agricultural BACM V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS The Rule Contains: Emission Limits in Section(s): Work Practice Standards in Section(s): Rule 502, Section 6.2 Recordkeeping Requ irements in Section(s): Rule 502, Section 6.5 Reporting Requirements in Section(s):CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD 

### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 3

(Electroni c Format)

5/1/2002 3

VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN No Impact Impacts RFP Impacts attainment Di scussion: