alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          20,649
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 4,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      1,760
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          45,489
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            45,643
<LOANS>                                        219,274
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,359
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 299,840
<DEPOSITS>                                     263,030
<SHORT-TERM>                                     5,797
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,087
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           711
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,215
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 299,840
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 15,084
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,114
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                17,425
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,944
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,335
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           12,090
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      810
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 14,496
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (665)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       (309)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (309)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.43)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.94
<LOANS-NON>                                      3,716
<LOANS-PAST>                                       122
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,198
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      689
<RECOVERIES>                                        40
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,359
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,359
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            411
        

</TABLE>
Filed: November 5, 1998
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1204

(CR-96-66)
In Re: MICHAEL ANTONIO ADDISON, Petitioner.

ORDER The court amends its opinion filed May 1, 1998, as follows: On page 2, first full paragraph, line 4 -- the words “pled guilty to” are corrected to read “was convicted of.” On page 2, second full paragraph, line 1 -- the words “guilty plea” are corrected to read “convictions.” For the Court - By Direction

/s/ Patricia S. Connor Clerk

### 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1204
In Re: MICHAEL ANTONIO ADDISON, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. Submitted: April 16, 1998 Decided: May 1, 1998 Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Antonio Addison, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

### 3 PER CURIAM: Michael Antonio Addison has filed a petition for a writ ofmandamus from this court seeking an order staying the South Carolina state court from proceeding against him in a criminal case. Subsequent to the filing of this petition, Addison was convicted ofthe criminal charges and is now in state custody serving his sentence. Addison has now filed a motion for release, alleging that he is being held against his will and denied legal materials. Because Addison's convictions rendered his petition moot, we deny his mandamus petition and his motion for release. To the extent Addison's motion for release can be construed as another mandamus petition challenging the validity of his conviction, we deny this petition, because Addison has not shown that he has "no other adequate means to attain the relief he desires" or that his entitlement to such relief is "clear and indisputable." See Allied Chem. Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc. , 449 U.S. 33, 35 (1980). We also denyAppellant's motion for an injunction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
# C_2016090EN.01001601.xml

| 7.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 90/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 90/16

---

Judgment of the General Court of 21 January 2016 — Laboratorios Ern v OHIM — michelle menard (Lenah. C)

(Case T-802/14) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark Lenah.C - Earlier national word mark LEMA - Relative grounds for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2016/C 090/22)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Laboratorios Ern, SA (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: S. Correa Rodriguez, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Bonne, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: michelle menard GmbH — Berlin cosmetics (Berlin, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 24 September 2014 (Case R 2260/2013-4) concerning opposition proceedings between Laboratorios Ern, S A and michelle menard GmbH — Berlin cosmetics.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Laboratorios Ern, S A to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Laboratorios Ern, S A to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 46, 9.2.2015.

1

---
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT

                     Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
                         Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): February 28, 2003

                  The CIT Group Securitization Corporation III
             (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

                                    Delaware
                 (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)

       333-64529                                         51-0374926
(Commission File Number)                       (IRS Employer Identification No.)

1 CIT Drive
Livingston, New Jersey                                                07039-5703
(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)                 (Zip Code)

Registrants' telephone number, including area code: (973) 535-3512

                                       N/A
          (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)
<PAGE>

Item 7. Financial Statements and Exhibits.
        ----------------------------------

(c) Exhibits.

      The following are filed herewith. The exhibit numbers correspond with Item
601(b) of Regulation S-K.

Exhibit No.                                 Description
-----------                                 -----------
   99.1                                     Computational Materials

                                    SIGNATURE
                                    ---------

      Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                            The CIT Group Securitization
                                            Corporation III

                                            By: /s/ Frank Garcia
                                               --------------------------------

                                            Name:  Frank Garcia
                                            Title: Senior Vice President

Dated: February 28, 2003
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of ViroPharma Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned
officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Vincent J. Milano                
|Vincent J. Milano                    
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|February 24, 2011                    

|                           
|---------------------------
|                           
|/s/ Charles A. Rowland, Jr.
|Charles A. Rowland, Jr.    
|Chief Financial Officer    
|February 24, 2011          



|* | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# C_2015398EN.01005501.xml

| 30.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 398/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 398/55

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 October 2015 — Jurašinović v Council

(Case T-658/14) (1)

1

((Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents exchange with the International Criminal Tribunal for the former-Yugoslavia in the course of legal proceedings - Decision taken following the partial annulment by the Tribunal of the initial decision - Partial refusal of access - Exception relating to the protection of international relations))

(2015/C 398/69)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Ivan Jurašinović (Angers, France) (represented by: O. Pfligersdorffer and S. Durieu, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: E. Rebasti and A. Jensen, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the Council decision of 8 July 2014 refusing to grant the applicant full access to certain documents exchanged with the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia in the case against A. Gotovina, taken following the partial annulment of the initial decision by judgment of 3 October 2012 in Jurašinović v Council (T-63/10, Rec, EU:T:2012:516).

Jurašinović

Council

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that there is no need to adjudicate on the action in so far as the form of order seeking annulment of the decision of the Council of the European Union of 8 July 2014 refusing to grant Mr Ivan Jurašinović full access to certain documents exchanged with the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia in the proceedings against Mr A. Gotovina, taken following the partial annulment of the initial decision by judgment of 3 October 2012 in Jurašinović v Council (T-63/10, Rec, EU:T:2012:516)concern Documents No 7, 25, 33, 34 and 36. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that there is no need to adjudicate on the action in so far as the form of order seeking annulment of the decision of the Council of the European Union of 8 July 2014 refusing to grant Mr Ivan Jurašinović full access to certain documents exchanged with the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia in the proceedings against Mr A. Gotovina, taken following the partial annulment of the initial decision by judgment of 3 October 2012 in Jurašinović v Council (T-63/10, Rec, EU:T:2012:516)concern Documents No 7, 25, 33, 34 and 36.

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the action. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the action.

| 3. | Orders Mr Jurašinović to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Mr Jurašinović to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council.

---

(1)  OJ C 380, 27.10.2014.

1

---
Editorial Note on Part 862
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 862 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 862.1345 Glucose test system. ( a ) *Identification.* A glucose test system is a device intended to measure glucose quantitatively in blood and other body fluids. Glucose measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of carbohydrate metabolism disorders including diabetes mellitus, neonatal hypoglycemia, and idiopathic hypoglycemia, and of pancreatic islet cell carcinoma.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device, when it is solely intended for use as a drink to test glucose tolerance, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9.
[52 FR 16122, May 1, 1987, as amended at 84 FR 71796, Dec. 30, 2019; 85 FR 18445, Apr. 2, 2020]
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF LOUD TECHNOLOGIES INC.
As of December 31, 2003

|Subsidiary                        |  | State of Incorporation or
Country in which Organized
|--------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Acuma Labs Inc.                   |  | Canada                                              
|Class A, s.ro.                    |  | The Czech Republic                                  
|LOUD Technologies (Europe) Plc.   |  | UK                                                  
|Mackie Designs (Deutschland) GmbH |  | Germany                                             
|Mackie Designs (France) S.A.      |  | France                                              
|Mackie Designs Inc.               |  | Washington, U.S.A                                   
|Mackie Designs (Netherlands) B.V. |  | The Netherlands                                     
|SIA Software Company, Inc.        |  | New York, U.S.A.                                    

---
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 41 (Wednesday, March 3, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9613-9614]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4440]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Importer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated November 20, 2009, and published in the Federal 
Register on November 30, 2009 (74 FR 62598), Aptuit, 10245 Hickman 
Mills Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64137, made application to the Drug 
Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as an importer of 
Poppy Straw Concentrate (9670), a basic class of controlled substance 
listed in schedule II.
    The company plans to import an ointment for the treatment of wounds 
which contain trace amounts of the controlled substance normally found 
in poppy straw concentrate for packaging and labeling for clinical 
trials.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and 952(a), and determined that the 
registration of Aptuit to import the basic class of controlled 
substance is consistent with the public interest, and with United 
States obligations under international treaties, conventions, or 
protocols in effect on May 1, 1971, at this time. DEA has investigated 
Aptuit to ensure that the company's registration is consistent with the 
public interest. The investigation has included inspection and testing 
of the company's physical security systems, verification of the 
company's compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the 
company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 
952(a) and 958(a), and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34, the above 
named company is granted registration as an importer of the basic class 
of controlled substance listed.


[[Page 9614]]


    Dated: February 24, 2010.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-4440 Filed 3-2-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of - )

)

Sauer Incorporated ) ASBCA No. 62395

)

Under Contract No. W91278-07-D-0030 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Gina P. Grimsley, Esq.

 Counsel

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Michael P. Goodman, Esq.

 Engineer Chief Trial Attorney

Laura J. Arnett, Esq.

 Engineer Trial Attorney

 U.S. Army Engineer District, Savannah

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: July 11, 2022

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the 

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62395, Appeal of Sauer 

Incorporated, rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: July 12, 2022

DAVID B. STINSON

Administrative Judge

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM WESTERN
WIRELESS CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AS OF AND FOR
THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH 10Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          25,242
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   72,675
<ALLOWANCES>                                    14,316
<INVENTORY>                                     23,508
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               127,247
<PP&E>                                       1,121,020
<DEPRECIATION>                                 322,380
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,850,397
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          191,174
<BONDS>                                      1,415,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       800,949
<OTHER-SE>                                   (647,936)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,850,397
<SALES>                                         37,954
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               412,975
<CGS>                                           77,107
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  501,805
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               107,318
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                20,428
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              93,498 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (166,863)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (166,863)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (166,863)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.20)
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-03-237-CV

IN RE JAMES W. LOOSE	RELATOR

	------------

	ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	The court has considered relator's amended petition for writ of mandamus    and amended motion for expedited consideration and is of the opinion that relief should be denied.  Accordingly, relator's amended petition for writ of mandamus and  amended motion for expedited consideration are denied.

	Relator shall pay all costs of this original proceeding, for which let execution issue.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL B:	LIVINGSTON, daDAUPHHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ.

		DAUPHINOT, J. would request response.

DELIVERED: August 29, 2003
# C_2015155EN.01002801.xml

| 11.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/28

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 24 March 2015 — Europower v Commission

(Case T-383/14 R)

((Interim measures - Public works contracts - Tendering procedure - Construction and maintenance of a tri-generation plant - Rejection of tender submitted by a tenderer and award of the contract to another tenderer - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Prima facie case - Lack of urgency))

(2015/C 155/33)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Europower SpA (Milan, Italy) (represented by: G. Cocco and L. Salomoni, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Cappelletti, L. Di Paolo and F. Moro, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application, in essence, for suspension of operation of the decision of 3 April 2014 in which the Commission rejected the tender submitted by Europower in tendering procedure JRC IPR 2013 C04 0031 OC for the construction and maintenance of a tri-generation plant with a gas turbine on the Ispra (Italy) site of its Joint Research Centre (JRC) (OJ 2013/S 137-237146) and awarded the contract to CPL Concordia, and consequently all other subsequent decisions.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Costs are reserved.

---
§ 556.40 Ampicillin. ( a ) [Reserved]
( b ) *Tolerances.* The tolerances for ampicillin are: ( 1 ) *Cattle.* Edible tissues: 0.01 ppm.
( 2 ) *Swine.* Edible tissues: 0.01 ppm.
( c ) *Related conditions of use.* See §§ 520.90c, 522.90a, and 522.90b of this chapter.
[84 FR 32993, July 11, 2019, as amended at 85 FR 18120, Apr. 1, 2020]