alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM YOUBET.COM,
INCORPORATED FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      52,844,299
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  143,549
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            54,442,157
<PP&E>                                       4,694,713
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,507,276)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              59,370,932
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,891,585
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,414
<OTHER-SE>                                  18,160,871
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                59,370,932
<SALES>                                      1,705,237
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,705,237
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,763,880
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,088,266
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,017,315
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,987,692)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,987,692)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,987,692)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.15)


</TABLE>
STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY DEi\ 

RICK SNYDER 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

July 27, 2015 

Dr. Susan Hedman, Regional Administrator 

United States Environmental Protection Agency 

Region 5 

77 West Jackson Boulevard (R-19J) 

Chicago, Illinois 60604-3507 

Dear Dr. Hedman: 

DAN WYANT 

DIRECTOR 

SUBJECT: 40 CFR, Part 60, Negative Declaration for Small Municipal Waste Combustion 

Units 

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) promulgated revised 

Emission Guidelines and New Source Performance Standards for Existing Small Municipal 

Waste Combustion (SMWC) Units on December 6, 2000. The Emission Guidelines, 

specifically, 40 CFR §60.151 0, require the submittal of a letter of negative declaration to the 

USEPA if there are no existing SMWC Units in the state. The Michigan Department of 

Environmental Quality (MDEQ) has recently conducted a survey of all our district offices 

and current air quality permits. This search has confirmed that there are currently no 

existing SMWC Units, as defined by 40 CFR, Part 60, Subpart BBBB, in Michigan. 

Therefore, the MDEQ requests the US EPA's approval of this negative declaration. 

If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Ms. Erica Wolf, Air Quality 

Division, at 517-284-6766; wolfe1 @michigan.gov; or MDEQ, P.O. Box 30260, Lansing, 

Michigan 48909-7760; or you may contact me. 

~w Dan Wyant 

Director 

517-284-6700 

cc: Ms. Margaret Sieffert, USEPA, Region 5 

Mr. Jim Sygo, Chief Deputy Director, MDEQ 

Ms. Lynn Fiedler, MDEQ 

Ms. Mary Maupin, MDEQ 

Ms. Erica Wolf, MDEQ 

CONSTITUTION HALL" 525 WEST ALLEGAN STREET • P.O. BOX 30473 • LANSING, MICHIGAN 48909-7973 

www.michigan.gov/deq "(800) 662-9278
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.13

                            SECOND AMENDMENT TO LEASE

         That certain Lease dated May 20th, 1991, (the "Lease"), by and between
Carr Redmond Corporation, a Washington corporation, successor in interest to
Redmond East, L.L.C. ("Lessor") and Digital Systems International, Inc., a
Washington corporation ("Lessee"), for the Premises located at 6464 185th Avenue
NE, Suite 151, Redmond, Washington 98052, is amended this _________ day of June
1997, solely as hereinafter described.

         Effective the 1st day of June 1997, Lessor and Lessee desire to amend
the Lease as set forth below:

         Lessor's name shall be changed from Digital Systems International, Inc.
to Mosaix, Inc.

         All other terms and conditions of the above-described Lease shall
remain in full force and effect.








LESSOR:   Carr Redmond Corporation,        LESSEE:   Mosaix, Inc.,
          a Washington corporation                   a Washington corporation
                                                    
By:       /s/ Philip L. Hawkins            By:       /s/ Wm. Bradford Weller
          ---------------------------                ---------------------------

Printed:  Philip L. Hawkins                Printed:  Wm. Bradford Weller
          ---------------------------                ---------------------------

Its:      Managing Director                Its:      General Counsel and
          ---------------------------                ---------------------------
                                                     Assistant Secretary
          ---------------------------                ---------------------------

Date:     7/15/97                          Date:     7/10/98
          ---------------------------                ---------------------------
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 6753

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. TORRE LARON JOHNSON, a/k/a Torre Omar Johnson , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Richard D. Bennett , District Judge. ( 1:11

- cr - 00346

- RDB

- 2 ; 1:15

- cv - 02420

- RDB ; 1:17

- cv - 03592

- RDB )

Submitted : October 10, 2018 Decided: October 16, 2018

Before KEENAN and WYNN , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Torre Laron Johnson , Appellant Pro Se. Ellen Elisabeth Cobb , OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY , Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Torre Laron Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the de nial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Johnson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
<PAGE>   1







                                  EXHIBIT 11.1
<PAGE>   2
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                 STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                        -----------------------------------------
                                             1994          1995          1996
                                             ----          ----          ----
<S>                                     <C>             <C>           <C>
Income per share calculations:

Income before extraordinary item        $     281,102   $ 1,765,118   $ 2,330,821

Extraordinary item                                 --            --        64,290
                                        -------------   -----------   -----------

Net income                              $     281,102   $ 1,765,118   $ 2,266,531
                                        =============   ===========   ===========

Weighted average number
  of common and common
  equivalent shares are as follows:
     Weighted average common
        shares outstanding                                3,183,839    10,273,075
     Shares issued from assumed
        exercise of options and
        warrants (1)                                        211,161       181,925
                                        -------------   -----------   -----------
     Weighted average number
        of shares outstanding                N/A          3,395,000    10,455,000
                                        =============   ===========   ===========

Income per common and common
  equivalent shares:

     Income before extraordinary item                   $      0.52   $      0.23

     Extraordinary item                                          --          0.01
                                        -------------   -----------   -----------

     Net income                              N/A        $      0.52   $      0.22
                                        =============   ===========   ===========
</TABLE>


--------------------------------------------

(1)  Shares issued from assumed exercise of options and warrants include the
     number of incremental shares which would result from applying the "treasury
     stock method" for options and warrants, APB 15, paragraph 38 and Staff
     Accouting Bulletin No. 83.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CEC Entertainment, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended April 2, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Richard M. FrankRichard M. FrankChief Executive OfficerApril 23, 2007


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to CEC
Entertainment, Inc. and will be retained by CEC Entertainment, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



35
**Exhibit 31.2**

**Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certfication**

I, Joseph Dwyer,certify that:

1.                 I have reviewedthis annual report on Form 10-K of AXS-One Inc.;

2.                 Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                 Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)    Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(c)    Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(d)   Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)    Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: March 31, 2005 | /s/ JOSEPH  DWYER                                                   |
|---------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      | Joseph Dwyer                                                        |
|                      | *Executive Vice President, Chief Financial  Officer, and Treasurer* |

 

1

----
Editorial Note on Part 73
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 73 appear at 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001.

§ 73.300 Carrot oil. ( a ) *Identity.* ( 1 ) The color additive carrot oil is the liquid or the solid portion of the mixture or the mixture itself obtained by the hexane extraction of edible carrots (*Daucus carota* L.) with subsequent removal of the hexane by vacuum distillation. The resultant mixture of solid and liquid extractives consists chiefly of oils, fats, waxes, and carrotenoids naturally occurring in carrots. The definition of carrot oil in this paragraph is for the purpose of identity as a color additive only and shall not be construed as setting forth an official standard for carrot oil or carrot oleoresin under section 401 of the act.
( 2 ) Color additive mixtures for food use made with carrot oil may contain only those diluents listed in this subpart as safe and suitable in color additive mixtures for coloring foods.
( b ) *Specifications.* Carrot oil shall contain no more than 25 parts per million of hexane.
( c ) *Uses and restrictions.* Carrot oil may be safely used for coloring foods generally, in amounts consistent with good manufacturing practice, except that it may not be used to color foods for which standards of identity have been promulgated under section 401 of the act unless the use of added color is authorized by such standards.
( d ) *Labeling requirements.* The label of the color additive and any mixtures prepared therefrom intended solely or in part for coloring purposes shall conform to the requirements of § 70.25 of this chapter.
( e ) *Exemption from certification.* Certification of this color additive is not necessary for the protection of the public health, and therefore batches thereof are exempt from the certification requirements of section 721(c) of the act.
Exhibit 23

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-101536, 333-69696, 333-45094, 333-83153, 333-58555, 333-29567, 333-02289,
033-60928, 033-58489, and 033-11718 of 4Kids Entertainment, Inc. on Form S-8 of
our report dated March 26, 2003, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
4Kids Entertainment, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2002.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE, LLP
New York, NY
March 31, 2003
Exhibit 32.1





AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTIONS 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ebix, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robin Raina, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


By:/s/ Robin RainaName: Robin RainaChief Executive Officer


February 13, 2012
Order entered October 9, 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 00687
- CR
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL DUCHARME, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 199
- 80054
- 2018



### O RDER Before the Court is Official Court Reporter Sheri J. Vecera’s October 8, 2018 request for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record. We GRANT the request and ORDER the reporter’s record filed on or before October 15, 2018

.
/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
§ 660.21 Processing. ( a ) *Processing method.* ( 1 ) The processing method shall be one that has been shown to yield consistently a specific, potent final product, free of properties that would affect adversely the intended use of the product throughout its dating period. Stability testing shall be performed on an adequate number of representative samples of each group of products manufactured in the same fashion.
( 2 ) Only that material that has been fully processed, thoroughly mixed in a single vessel, and filtered shall constitute a lot.
( 3 ) A lot may be subdivided into sublots. If lots are to be subdivided, the manufacturer shall include this information in the biologics license application. The manufacturer shall describe the test specifications to verify that each sublot is identical to other sublots of the lot.
( 4 ) Each lot of Blood Grouping Reagent shall be identified by a lot number. Each sublot shall be identified by that lot number to which a distinctive prefix or suffix shall be added. Final container and package labels shall bear the lot number and all distinctive prefixes and suffixes that have been applied to identify the sublot from which filling was accomplished.
( b ) *Color coding of reagents.* Blood Grouping Reagents may be colored provided the added colorant does not adversely affect the safety, purity, or potency of the product and the colorant is approved by the Director, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research.
( c ) *Final containers and dropper assemblies.* Final containers and dropper pipettes shall be colorless and sufficiently transparent to permit observation of the contents to detect particulate matter or increased turbidity during use.
( d ) *Volume of final product.* Each manufacturer shall identify the possible final container volumes in the biologics license application.
( e ) *Date of manufacture.* The date of manufacture shall be the date the manufacturer begins the last entire group of potency tests.
[53 FR 12764, Apr. 19, 1988, as amended at 64 FR 56454, Oct. 20, 1999; 65 FR 77499, Dec. 12, 2000; 67 FR 9587, Mar. 4, 2002; 70 FR 14985, Mar. 24, 2005]
Editorial Note on Part 864
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 864 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 864.6150 Capillary blood collection tube. ( a ) *Identification.* A capillary blood collection tube is a plain or heparinized glass tube of very small diameter used to collect blood by capillary action.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 864.9.
[45 FR 60604, Sept. 12, 1980, as amended at 54 FR 25045, June 12, 1989; 65 FR 2310, Jan. 14, 2000]
August 8, 2016

Mr. Bill Reynolds
President and CEO Leading Edge Associates Inc 702 Tulip Tree Court
Fletcher

, NC 28732

Re: FAA

– 2015

– 0346

Dear Mr. Reynolds :

This letter is to provide notification that we have reviewed your petition for exemption, and have determined that we will continue to process your petition.

As referenced in the June 22, 2016, letter posted to your docket at www.regulations.gov

, we are reviewing pending Section 333 petitions to determine if the recently

- issued regulation, Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 107 ( www.faa.gov/uas ) will satisfy your request

. We have determined that

y our request requires further regulatory relief (Tier 3), and we will continue working on your petition for exemption

.

We have found that your petition, if granted, would set a precedent. Therefore, we will publish a summary of your petition in the Federal Register for public comments , if we have not done so already.

We will advise you of the agency’s final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding your petition, please contact me at 333exemptions@faa.gov

.

Sincerely,
/s/
Brenda Robeson Program A nalyst
Editorial Note on Part 862
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 862 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 862.1575 Phospholipid test system. ( a ) *Identification.* A phospholipid test system is a device intended to measure phospholipids in serum and plasma. Measurements of phospholipids are used in the diagnosis and treatment of disorders involving lipid (fat) metabolism.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9.
[52 FR 16122, May 1, 1987, as amended at 53 FR 21449, June 8, 1988; 66 FR 38788, July 25, 2001]