alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-1443

WILLIAM JOHN PETERSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JACK RICHARD PETERSON; BEAUMONT COMPANIES, INC.,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

THOMAS DENNIS PETERSON; THOMAS D. PETERSON, LLC,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, District Judge. (1:17-cv-00038-AJT-TCB)

Submitted: September 21, 2017 Decided: October 3, 2017

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William John Peterson, Appellant Pro Se. Miriam Rose Epstein, Tania M. L. Saylor, 

PETERSON SAYLOR, PLC, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

William John Peterson appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ 

motion to dismiss Peterson’s civil action. In its dispositive order, the district court 

explained that it granted the motion to dismiss for the reasons expressed at the motion 

hearing, but the record does not contain a transcript of that hearing. An appellant has the 

burden of including in the record on appeal a transcript of all parts of the proceedings 

material to the issues raised on appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 10(b); 4th Cir. R. 10(c). By 

failing to produce a transcript of the motion hearing, Peterson has waived review of the 

issues on appeal that depend upon the transcript to show error. See generally Fed. R. 

App. P. 10(b)(2); Keller v. Prince George’s Cty., 827 F.2d 952, 954 n.1 (4th Cir. 1987). 

As no error appears on the record before us, we affirm the district court’s order. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
Editorial Note on Part 314
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 314 appear at 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004; 81 FR 69639, Oct. 6, 2016.

§ 314.445 Guidance documents. ( a ) FDA has made available guidance documents under § 10.115 of this chapter to help you to comply with certain requirements of this part.
( b ) The Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) maintains a list of guidance documents that apply to CDER's regulations. The list is maintained on the Internet and is published annually in the Federal Register. A request for a copy of the CDER list should be directed to the Office of Training and Communications, Division of Drug Information, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002.
[65 FR 56480, Sept. 19, 2000, as amended at 74 FR 13113, Mar. 26, 2009]
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Wage Chronology: United States Steel Corporation, 1937-67

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Wage Chronology: United States Steel Corporation, 1937-67 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 1603*,												Washington, D.C: 								U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 										July 1968,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4911,			accessed on September 26, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
Editorial Note on Part 862
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 862 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 862.1655 Pyruvic acid test system. ( a ) *Identification.* A pyruvic acid test system is a device intended to measure pyruvic acid (an intermediate compound in the metabolism of carbohydrate) in plasma. Measurements obtained by this device are used in the evaluation of electrolyte metabolism and in the diagnosis and treatment of acid-base and electrolyte disturbances or anoxia (the reduction of oxygen in body tissues).
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 862.9.
[52 FR 16122, May 1, 1987, as amended at 65 FR 2308, Jan. 14, 2000]
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 42 (Thursday, March 4, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9910-9911]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4478]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center for Research Resources; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Research Resources 
Special Emphasis Panel;
    Date: March 25, 2010.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 12 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: 6701 Democracy Blvd., Democracy 1, 1082, Bethesda, MD 
(Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Sheri A. Hild, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
National Institutes of Health, National Center for Research 
Resources, Office of Review, 6701 Democracy Blvd, Rm. 1082, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-0811, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9df5f4f1f9eefcddf0fcf4f1b3f3f4f5b3faf2eb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="147c7d787067755479757d783a7a7d7c3a737b62">[email protected]</span></a>


[[Page 9911]]


(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research; 93.371, Biomedical 
Technology; 93.389, Research Infrastructure, 93.306, 93.333; 93.702, 
ARRA Related Construction Awards, National Institutes of Health, 
HHS)

    Dated: February 24, 2010.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-4478 Filed 3-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2017095EN.01000701.xml

| 27.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/7

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 February 2017 — Antrax It v EUIPO — Vasco Group (Thermosiphons for radiators)

(Joined Cases T-828/14 and T-829/14) (1)

1

((Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community designs representing thermosiphons for radiators - Earlier designs - Plea of unlawfulness - Article 1(d) of Regulation (EC) No 216/96 - Article 41(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights - Principle of impartiality - Composition of the Board of Appeal - Ground for invalidity - No individual character - Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Enforcement by EUIPO of a judgment setting aside a decision of one of its Boards of Appeal - Saturation of the state of the art - Date of assessment))

(2017/C 095/13)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Antrax It Srl (Resana, Italy) (represented by: L. Gazzola, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented initially by M. P. Bullock, and subsequently by L. Rampini and S. Di Natale, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervening before the General Court: Vasco Group NV, formerly Vasco Group BVBA (Dilsen, Belgium) (represented by: J. Haber, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 October 2014 (Cases R 1272/2013-3 and R 1273/2013-3) relating to invalidity proceedings between Vasco Group BVBA and Antrax It.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeals; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeals;

| 2. | Orders Antrax It Sarl to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and Vasco Group, including those incurred by Vasco Group NV for the proceedings before the Board of Appeal in Cases R 1272/2013-3 and R 1273/2013-3. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Antrax It Sarl to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and Vasco Group, including those incurred by Vasco Group NV for the proceedings before the Board of Appeal in Cases R 1272/2013-3 and R 1273/2013-3.

---

(1)  OJ C 65, 23.2.2015.

1

---
§ 601.6 Suspension of license. ( a ) Whenever the Commissioner has reasonable grounds to believe that any of the grounds for revocation of a license exist and that by reason thereof there is a danger to health, the Commissioner may notify the licensed manufacturer that the biologics license is suspended and require that the licensed manufacturer do the following: ( 1 ) Notify the selling agents and distributors to whom such product or products have been delivered of such suspension, and
( 2 ) Furnish to the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research or the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, complete records of such deliveries and notice of suspension.
( b ) Upon suspension of a license, the Commissioner shall either: ( 1 ) Proceed under the provisions of § 601.5(b) of this chapter to revoke the license, or
( 2 ) If the licensed manufacturer agrees, hold revocation in abeyance pending resolution of the matters involved.
[64 FR 56451, Oct. 20, 1999, as amended at 70 FR 14983, Mar. 24, 2005]
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-14-00050-CR

Adrien "Bull" Shermane Thomas

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

24th District Court of DeWitt County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 05-04-10,130

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

September 18, 2014
EXHIBIT 3.1(a)

AMENDED AND RESTATED  CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION  OF YOUBET.COM, INC.

First:The name of this corporation shall be YOUBET.COM, INC.

Second:Its registered office in the State of Delaware is to be located at 2711 Centerville Road, Suite 400, in the
City of Wilmington, County of New Castle 19808 and its registered agent at such address is Corporation Service Company.

Third:The purpose of the corporation shall be to engage in any lawful act or activity for which corporations may be
organized under the General Corporation Law of Delaware.

Fourth:The total number of shares of stock which the corporation shall have the authority to issue is:



Fifth:The Board of Directors shall have the power to adopt, amend or appeal the by-laws.

Sixth:No director shall be personally liable to the corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for any
breach of fiduciary duty by such director as a director. Notwithstanding the foregoing sentence, a director shall be liable to the extent provided by applicable law, (i) for breach of the
director's duty of loyalty to the corporation or its stockholders, (ii) for acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law,
(iii) pursuant to Section 174 of the Delaware General Corporation Law or (iv) for any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit. No amendment to or
repeal of this Article Sixth shall apply to or have any effect on the liability of any director of the corporation for or with respect to any acts or omissions of such director occurring prior to such
amendment.

---

QuickLinks
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF KPMG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

The Board of DirectorsMackie Designs, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by referencein the registration statement (No. 33-98720) on Form S-8 of Mackie Designs,Inc. of our report dated February 22, 2001, relating to the consolidatedbalance sheets of Mackie Designs, Inc as of December 31, 2000 and 1999 andthe related consolidated statements of income, cash flows and shareholders’equity and comprehensive income for the years then ended, the relatedconsolidated financial statement schedule for the years then ended, whichreport appears in the December 31, 2000 annual report on Form 10-K ofMackie Designs, Inc.

 
|   | KPMG  LLP |
|--------|-----------|
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 42


### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 06/29 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 29 Jun 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 76.30 WMeters AGL
§ 21.40 Procedures for submitting requests for notification and access. ( a ) An individual may request that the Food and Drug Administration notify him whether a Privacy Act Record System contains records about him that are retrieved by reference to his name or other personal identifier. An individual may at the same time, or after receiving notification that such a record about him exists, requests that he be given access to the record.
( b ) An individual desiring notification or access to records shall mail or deliver a request for records in any Food and Drug Administration Privacy Act Records System to the FDA Privacy Act Coordinator (address is located on the agency web site at *http://www.gov.fda*).
( c ) Requests shall be in writing and shall name the Privacy Act Record System or Systems concerning which the individual requests notification of whether there are records about him that are retrieved by reference to his name or other personal identifier. To help assure a prompt response, an individual should indicate that he is making a “Privacy Act Request” on the envelope and in a prominent manner in the letter.
( d ) An individual who merely wishes to be notified whether a Privacy Act Record System contains a record about him ordinarily need not provide any verification of his identity other than his name. The mere fact that the Food and Drug Administration has a record about an individual in any of its Privacy Act Records Systems would not be likely to constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Where mere disclosure of the fact that a record about the individual exists would be a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, further verification of the identity of the individual shall be required.
( e ) An individual who requests that he be given access to a copy of records about himself, if any exist, should indicate whether he prefers ( 1 ) to have copies of any such records mailed to him in accordance with § 21.43(a)(1), which may involve a fee under § 21.45, including information to verify his identity under § 21.44 or
( 2 ) to use the procedures for access in person under § 21.43(a)(2).
( f ) A request for notification and access may be submitted under this subpart concerning any Privacy Act Record System that is exempt under § 21.61, as indicated in the notice for the system. An individual seeking access to records under § 21.65(b)(2) to investigatory records compiled for law enforcement purposes other than criminal law enforcement purposes should submit a description of the right, benefit, or privilege that he believes he was denied as the result of the Food and Drug Administration's maintenance of the records. Where the system is exempt under § 21.61, and access to the requested records is not granted under § 21.65, the request shall be handled under the provisions of part 20 of this chapter (the public information regulations).
[42 FR 15626, Mar. 22, 1977, as amended at 46 FR 8458, Jan. 27, 1981; 50 FR 52278, Dec. 23, 1985; 76 FR 31470, June 1, 2011; 79 FR 68115, Nov. 14, 2014]
# FILED Au gust 29, 1997 Cecil Crowson, Jr . App ellate C ou rt Clerk IN THE COU RT OF CR IMINA L A PPEA LS OF TENN ESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE AUGUST 1997 SESS ION

JAMES DA

VID PACK, ) ) C.C.A. N o. 03C01-9611-C R-00440 Appellant, ) ) Hamilton C ounty V. ) ) Hon. Dou glas A. Meyer , Judge ) STA TE OF TENN ESSEE, ) ) ( Writ of error coram nobis) Appellee. )
FOR TH E APPEL LANT: FOR THE APPELLEE: James Davi d Pack, Pro Se Charles W. Burson F.C. I. Beckley Attorney General & Reporter P.O. Box 305 Beaver, WV 25813 Marvin E. Clements, J r. Assistant Attorney Gener al 450 James Roberts on Parkway Nashvil le, TN 37243-0493 William H. Cox III Distric t Attorney General 600 Market Str

eet, Suite 310 Chattanooga, TN 37402
OPINION FILE D: ___________________ AF FIRMED PAU L G. SUMM ERS, Judge-2- O P I N I O N In February

1979 the appellant, James Davi d Pack, pled g uilty to four counts of second deg ree burgla ry, two counts of passinga forged document, and one count of grand larceny . He recei ved an effective sentence of three years incarceration. In September 198 2 he pled guilty to four counts of sim ple possession of a co ntrolled substance, one count of poss ession of a contr olled substance w ith intent to s ell, three counts of first deg ree burgla ry, one cou nt of second degree burglary , one count of possess ion of burglar y tools, a nd numerous counts of receiving stolen property. He received an effective sentence of ten years i ncarceration . In May 1996 the appellant fil ed a petition for w rit of error cor am nobis attacki ng these conv ictions. The t rial court dismissed the petition on the g round that it w as barred by

the statute of li mitations. The appellant then f iled a motion for reconside ration and motion to con strue his previous pleading as a petition for post-convic tion relief. The appellant's most recent conv ictions became final in 1982. At that time the law

allowed o ne year from a fina l judgment to file a petition for writ of error coram nobis. Tenn. C ode Ann. § 27-7 -103 ( 1980). The appe llant 's ti me period for filin g his peti tion expir ed in 1983. Therefore, his petitio n for writ of error cor am nobis is ti me barred. The appellant also moved that his petition be con strued as one for postconvicti on relief. However, at th e time of his offenses, the law all owed three years to fil e a petition for po st-convi ction reli ef. Tenn. Code Ann. § 40- 30-102 (1980). The time period for filin g this peti tion expir ed in 1985. Therefore, regardles s of how the appel lant’s motion i s construed, i t is time bar red.-3- W e find appellant's pro se brief artfully drafted an d we understand his allegations . We, however, find no er ror of law mandating rev

ersal of the tri al cour t’s de term inat ions . Purs uan t to T enn . R. Ct . Crim . App ., Ru le 20 , we AFFIRM.

__________________________ PAUL G. S UMMERS, Ju dge CONCUR:

_________________________ GARY R. W ADE, Jud ge

_________________________ W ILLIAM M. BARKER, Judge
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 43 (Friday, March 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 10246]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4609]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER10-769-000]


Glenwood Energy Partners, Ltd.; Supplemental Notice That Initial 
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

February 25, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Glenwood Energy Partners, Ltd.'s application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is March 17, 2010.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#30767562737f5e5c595e55634540405f424470565542531e575f46"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e1a7a4b3a2ae8f8d888f84b29491918e9395a187849382cf868e97">[email protected]</span></a>. or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-4609 Filed 3-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Order filed, July 27, 2016

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 16

- 00530

- CV

____________ TRAFIGURA PTE. LTD. , Appellant

V.

CNA METALS LIMITED , Appellee

On Appeal from the 434th Judicial District Court

Fort Bend County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 13

- DCV

- 210802

- B



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due July 18, 2016

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record.
The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order. We order Karen Woolsey, the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal within 10 days of the date of this order

. PER CURIAM