alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Home Products International, Inc.
 (the  "Company") on Form 10-Q  for the period ended  June 28, 2003 as  filed
 with the Securities and Exchange Commission  on August 11, 2003, I, James E.
 Winslow, Executive  Vice  President  and  Chief  Financial  Officer  of  the
 Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
 section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.


 /s/ JAMES E. WINSLOW
 --------------------
 James E. Winslow
 Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 August 11, 2003


 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
 provided to Home Products International, Inc.  and will be retained by  Home
 Products International, Inc.  and furnished to  the Securities and  Exchange
 Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2014329EN.01001501.xml

| 22.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 329/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 329/15

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 10 June 2014 — Dieckerhoff Guss v Commission

(Case T-174/14 R)

((Interim measures - State aid - National promotion of electricity production from a renewable source - Commission decision to open formal investigation procedure in respect of State aid - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Urgency - Fumus boni juris))

2014/C 329/19

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Dieckerhoff Guss GmbH (Gevelsberg, Germany) (represented by: H. Höfler, C. Kahle and V. Winkler, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for suspension of the legal effects of the decision by which the Commission opened a formal investigation procedure in respect of State aid concerning the German law on renewable energy.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The judgment in Case T-174/14 R Dieckerhoff Guss v Commission is set aside |
| --- | --- |

2.

The judgment in Case T-174/14 R Dieckerhoff Guss v Commission is set aside

| 3. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Costs are reserved.

---
###### Editorial Note on Part 60

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 60 appear at 68 FR 24879, May 9, 2003, and at 88 FR 45065, July 14, 2023.

#### § 60.42 Notice of hearing.

Ten days before the hearing, FDA will notify the requesting party, the applicant, and the petitioner, orally or in writing, of the date, time, and location of the hearing. The agency will provide the requesting party, the applicant, and the petitioner with an opportunity to participate as a party in the hearing.
Editorial Note on Part 866
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 866 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 866.5680 Myoglobin immunological test system. ( a ) *Identification.* A myoglobin immunological test system is a device that consists of the reagents used to measure by immunochemical techniques the myoglobin (an oxygen storage protein found in muscle) in serum and other body fluids. Measurement of myoglobin aids in the rapid diagnosis of heart or renal disease.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).
§ 582.5449 Manganese citrate. ( a ) *Product.* Manganese citrate.
( b ) *Conditions of use.* This substance is generally recognized as safe when used in accordance with good manufacturing or feeding practice.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6330

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

FRANCISCO SERRANO,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Charleston. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior 

District Judge. (2:09-cr-00683-SB-6; 2:14-cv-03839-SB)

Submitted: June 21, 2016 Decided: June 23,2016

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Francisco Serrano, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Nicholas Bianchi, 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South 

Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Francisco Serrano seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The 

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B)

(2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Serrano has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.2








CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Form 10-Q”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 of Crimson Exploration Inc. (the “Issuer”).  The undersigned hereby certifies that the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.





Date:
November 10, 2010/s/ E. Joseph GradyName:
E. Joseph GradyTitle:
Senior Vice PresidentChief Financial Officer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Issuer and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission, or its staff, upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE SHEETS  (UNAUDITED) AS OF FEBRUARY 1, 1998 AND NOVEMBER 2,
1997 AND THE CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) FOR THE QUARTERS
ENDED FEBRUARY 1, 1998 AND FEBRUARY 2, 1997
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-03-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-01-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          37,439
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  190,281
<ALLOWANCES>                                    12,752
<INVENTORY>                                    601,161
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               827,006
<PP&E>                                         169,587
<DEPRECIATION>                                  83,856
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,038,244
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          672,025
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           196
<OTHER-SE>                                     282,687
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,038,244
<SALES>                                      1,179,011
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,179,011
<CGS>                                        1,105,186
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,105,186
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                73,061
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,346
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,177)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,061)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,116)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,116)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.31)
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

STEPHEN T. FURST,

Petitioner

v.

EASTON AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT AND EASTON AREA BOARD OF EDUCATION,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 208 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 28th day of September, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7654

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

BOBBY LEON JOHNSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at 

Charlotte. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (3:01-cr-00210-MR-1; 3:16-cv-00275-

MR)

Submitted: March 10, 2020 Decided: March 13, 2020

Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bobby Leon Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Bobby Leon Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting the 

Government’s motion to dismiss his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2018) motion. The order is not 

appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2018). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2018). 

When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find the district court’s assessment of the 

constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis, 137 S. Ct. 759, 773-74 (2017). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate 

both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 

140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Johnson has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Editorial Note on Part 870
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 870 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 870.5550 External transcutaneous cardiac pacemaker (noninvasive). ( a ) *Identification.* An external transcutaneous cardiac pacemaker (noninvasive) is a device used to supply a periodic electrical pulse intended to pace the heart. The pulse from the device is usually applied to the surface of the chest through electrodes such as defibrillator paddles.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II. The special controls for this device are: ( 1 ) “American National Standards Institute/American Association for Medical Instrumentation's DF-21 ‘Cardiac Defibrillator Devices’ ” 2d ed., 1996, and
( 2 ) “The maximum pulse amplitude should not exceed 200 milliamperes. The maximum pulse duration should not exceed 50 milliseconds.”
[45 FR 7907, Feb. 5, 1980, as amended at 52 FR 17737, May 11, 1987; 65 FR 17144, Mar. 31, 2000]
# C_2014135EN.01005801.xml

| 5.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 135/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 135/58

---

Action brought on 7 March 2014 — Volkswagen v OHIM (StartUp)

(Case T-156/14)

2014/C 135/76

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Volkswagen AG (Wolfsburg, Germany) (represented by U. Sander, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 7 January 2014 in Case R 1335/2013-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 7 January 2014 in Case R 1335/2013-4;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘StartUp’ for goods and services in Classes 12, 28, 35 and 37 — Community trade mark application No 11 792 009

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Registration refused

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law:

Pleas in law:

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009

---
#### Sam Sobol *v.*Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Wethersfield et al.

King, C. J., Alcorn, House, Thim and Ryan, Js.

Argued November 12

decided November 13, 1969

*Richard P. Kuzmak,*for the appellants (defendant Candido D’Occhio et al.).

*Edward H. Kenyon,*for the appellee (plaintiff).

Per Curiam.

The trial court substituted its judgment for that of the defendant commission. It had no authority to do so. *Belknap*v. *Zoning Board of Appeals,*155 Conn. 380, 384, 232 A.2d 922, and cases cited; see *Hawkes*v. *Town Plan & Zoning Commission,*156 Conn. 207, 240 A.2d 914.

There is error, the judgment is set aside and the case is remanded with direction to dismiss the appeal.
Editorial Note on Part 866
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 866 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 866.3460 Rabiesvirus immunofluorescent reagents. ( a ) *Identification.* Rabiesvirus immunofluorescent reagents are devices that consist of rabiesvirus antisera conjugated with a fluorescent dye used to identify rabiesvirus in specimens taken from suspected rabid animals. The identification aids in the diagnosis of rabies in patients exposed by animal bites and provides epidemiological information on rabies. Rabies is an acute infectious disease of the central nervous system which, if undiagnosed, may be fatal. The disease is commonly transmitted to humans by a bite from a rabid animal.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Income Partners 1986-D, Ltd's balance sheet and statement of operations
contained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1996.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         1,000
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  184,431
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               185,431
<PP&E>                                         12,954,592
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (10,484,114)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,655,909
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          97,449
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,433,896
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,655,909
<SALES>                                        693,732
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               706,581
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  391,312<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                216,095
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            216,095
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   216,095
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes lease operating expenses, production taxes and depreciation deple-
tion and amoritization expense.  Excludes general and administrative and interest
expense.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 868
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 868 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 868.5450 Respiratory gas humidifier. ( a ) *Identification.* A respiratory gas humidifier is a device that is intended to add moisture to, and sometimes to warm, the breathing gases for administration to a patient. Cascade, gas, heated, and prefilled humidifiers are included in this generic type of device.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert F. Kerris, state and attest that:

(1) I am the Chief Financial Officer of Ebix, Inc.
(the Registrant).

(2) In connection with the amended Quarterly Report of the Registrant on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended
March 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the Report containing financial statements fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented.



By:

/s/ Robert KerrisName:

Robert KerrisChief Financial OfficerNovember 15, 2012
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21
 
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                STATE OR OTHER
                                                                                 JURISDICTION
                                                                                      OF
                                                               PERCENTAGE OF     INCORPORATION
         PARENT                           SUBSIDIARY             OWNERSHIP       OF SUBSIDIARY
----------------------------     ----------------------------  -------------    ---------------
<S>                              <C>                           <C>              <C>
 
Beal Financial Corporation..     Beal Banc Holding Company         100%            Deleware
    
 
Beal Financial Corporation..     Beal Delaware Corp.               100%            Deleware
 
Beal Financial Corporation..     380 Investors, Inc.               100%            Texas
 
Beal Banc Holding Company...     Beal Bank, SSB                    100%            Texas
 
Beal Bank, SSB..............     Beal Mortgage, Inc.               100%            Texas
 
Beal Bank, SSB..............     Loan Acceptance Corp.             100%            Texas
 
Beal Bank, SSB..............     Property Acceptance Corp.         100%            Texas
 
Beal Bank, SSB..............     BRE, Inc.                         100%            Texas
 
Beal Bank, SSB..............     Bre-N, Inc.                       100%            Texas
 
Beal Bank, SSB..............     Beal Properties, Inc.             100%            Texas
 
Beal Bank, SSB..............     Foreign Lending Corp.             100%            Texas
 
Beal Bank, SSB..............     Beal Affordable Housing, Inc.     100%            Texas
 
Beal Bank, SSB..............     BRE-2, Inc.                       100%            Texas
 
Beal Delaware Corp..........     Beal Business Trust               100%            Delaware
 
Beal Affordable Housing, Inc.    Hebron Trail, Ltd.(1)             99%             Texas
 
Beal Affordable Housing, Inc.    Lewisville Manor, Ltd.(1)         99%             Texas
 
Beal Affordable Housing, Inc.    Valley River Trail, Ltd.(1)       99%             Texas
 
Beal Properties, Inc........     Houston Central Green, LP         50%             Texas
</TABLE>
 
------------------------
 
(1) Beal Affordable Housing, Inc. is a 98% limited partner and Beal Mortgage,
    Inc. is a 1% general partner in these entities.
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER****Pursuant to****Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**     I, Keith A. Meister, Chief Executive Officer (PrincipalExecutive Officer) of American Property Investors, Inc., theGeneral Partner of American Real Estate Partners, L.P. (the“Registrant”), certify that to the best of myknowledge, based upon a review of the American Real EstatePartners, L.P., quarterly report on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended March 31, 2005 of the Registrant (the“Report”):          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934, as amended; and           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Registrant.     /s/ Keith A. Meister           Keith A. Meister *Chief Executive Officer of* *American Property Investors, Inc.,* *the General Partner of* *American Real Estate Partners, L.P.*Date: May 10, 2005