Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 44 / Monday, March 8, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 10413 

No.’’ and adding in its place ‘‘CBP Dec. 

10–01’’. 

David V. Aguilar, 

Acting Deputy Commissioner, U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection. 

Approved: March 2, 2010. 

Timothy E. Skud, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Treasury. 

[FR Doc. 2010–4783 Filed 3–5–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9111–14–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Food and Drug Administration 

21 CFR Part 514 

[Docket No. FDA–2009–N–0436] 

New Animal Drug Applications; 

Confirmation of Effective Date 

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, 

HHS. 

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation 

of effective date. 

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug 

Administration (FDA) is confirming the 

effective date of March 8, 2010, for the 

final rule that appeared in the Federal 

Register of October 23, 2009 (74 FR 

54749). The direct final rule amends the 

regulations regarding new animal drug 

applications (NADAs). Specifically, this 

direct final rule is being issued to 

provide that NADAs shall be submitted 

in the described form, as appropriate for 

the particular submission. Currently, the 

regulation requires that all NADAs 

contain the same informational sections 

and does not explicitly provide the 

appropriate flexibility needed to address 

the development of all types of new 

animal drug products. This amendment 

will allow the agency to appropriately 

review safety and effectiveness data 

submitted to support the approval of 

new animal drug products. This 

document confirms the effective date of 

the direct final rule. 

DATES: Effective date confirmed: March 

8, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Urvi 

Desai, Center for Veterinary Medicine 

(HFV–100), Food and Drug 

Administration, 7500 Standish Pl., 

Rockville, MD 20855, 240–276–8297, 

e-mail: urvi.desai@fda.hhs.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the 

Federal Register of October 23, 2009 (74 

FR 54749), FDA solicited comments 

concerning the direct final rule for a 75- 

day period ending January 6, 2010. FDA 

stated that the effective date of the 

direct final rule would be on March 8, 

2010, 60 days after the end of the 

comment period, unless any significant 

adverse comment was submitted to FDA 

during the comment period. FDA did 

not receive any significant adverse 

comments. 

Authority: Therefore, under the Federal 

Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under 

authority delegated to the Commissioner of 

Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 514 is 

amended. Accordingly, the amendments 

issued thereby are effective. 

Dated: March 3, 2010. 

Leslie Kux, 

Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy. 

[FR Doc. 2010–4923 Filed 3–5–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4160–01–S 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Department of the Navy 

32 CFR Part 706 

Certifications and Exemptions Under 

the International Regulations for 

Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972; 

Correction 

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD. 

ACTION: Final rule; correcting 

amendment. 

SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy 

published a document in the Federal 

Register of February 12, 2010, 

concerning certifications and 

exemptions under the International 

Regulations for Preventing Collisions at 

Sea, 1972 (72 COLREGS). The document 

contained an incorrect hull number. 

DATES: This correcting amendment is 

effective March 8, 2010, and is 

applicable beginning February 1, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Lieutenant Commander Ted Cook, 

JAGC, U.S. Navy, Admiralty Attorney, 

(Admiralty and Maritime Law), Office of 

the Judge Advocate General, Department 

of the Navy, 1322 Patterson Ave., SE., 

Suite 3000, Washington Navy Yard, DC 

20374–5066, telephone number: 202– 

685–5040. 

Need for Correction 

In the Federal Register (75 FR 6858) 

of February 12, 2010, in an amendment 

to § 706.2 Table Five, an incorrect hull 

number for the USS PHILIPPINE SEA 

was presented. 

List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 706 

Marine safety, Navigation (water), and 

Vessels. 

■ For the reasons set forth in the 

preamble, the Navy amends part 706 of 

title 32 of the Code of Federal 

Regulations by making the following 

correcting amendment: 

PART 706—CERTIFICATIONS AND 

EXEMPTIONS UNDER THE 

INTERNATIONAL REGULATIONS FOR 

PREVENTING COLLISIONS AT SEA, 

1972 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 706 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1605. 

■ 2. Section 706.2 is amended in Table 

Five by revising the entry for USS 

PHILIPPINE SEA (CG 58) to read as 

follows: 

§ 706.2 Certifications of the Secretary of 

the Navy under Executive Order 11964 and 

33 U.S.C. 1605. 

* * * * * 

TABLE FIVE

Vessel Number 

Masthead lights not over 

all other lights and 

obstructions. Annex I, 

Section 2(f) 

Forward masthead light 

not in forward quarter of 

ship. Annex I, 

Section 3(a) 

After masthead light less 

than 1⁄2 ship’s length aft 

of forward masthead 

light. Annex I, 

Section 3(a) 

Percentage horizontal 

separation attained 

* * * * * * * 

USS PHILIPPINE SEA CG59 ....... ........................................ X X 36.8 

* * * * * * * 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES
10414 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 44 / Monday, March 8, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 

* * * * * 

Approved: February 22, 2010. 

M. Robb Hyde, 

Commander, JAGC, U.S. Navy, Deputy 

Assistant Judge Advocate General (Admiralty 

and Maritime Law). 

Dated: February 24, 2010. 

A.M. Vallandingam, 

Lieutenant Commander, Office of the Judge 

Advocate General, U.S. Navy, Federal 

Register Liaison Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2010–4666 Filed 3–5–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3810–FF–P 

NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS 

ADMINISTRATION 

36 CFR Part 1254 

[FDMS Docket NARA–09–004] 

RIN 3095–AB59 

Researcher Identification Card 

AGENCY: National Archives and Records 

Administration (NARA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: NARA is amending its 

regulations to require researchers using 

original records, NARA microfilm, and 

public use computers at the National 

Archives Building in Washington, DC, 

to obtain a researcher identification 

card. Under the new requirements, 

researchers at regional archives are also 

required to obtain a researcher 

identification card when there is no 

separate research room for the use of 

microfilm and public access computers. 

DATES: This rule is effective April 7, 

2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Marilyn Redman at telephone number 

301–837–3174 or fax number 301–837– 

0319. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

September 25, 2009, NARA published a 

proposed rule in the Federal Register 

(74 FR 48892) for a 60-day public 

comment period. The proposed rule 

required researchers using original 

records, NARA microfilm, and public 

use computers at the National Archives 

Building in Washington, DC, to obtain a 

researcher identification card. 

Researchers at regional archives are also 

required to obtain a researcher 

identification card when there is no 

separate research room for the use of 

microfilm and public access computers. 

The proposed rule also updated our 

regulations to reflect changes in 

available technology and research room 

practices, such as abolishing the threehour time limit for using microfilm 

readers. Six comments were received. 

Of these, three basically supported the 

changes. One commenter wrote that the 

ID should include a requirement for an 

approved form of Federal identification 

before issuing the research card. 

Currently, States are converting their 

driver’s licenses to a single federallyapproved system. Our preferred form of 

identification is either a driver’s license 

or a passport for our foreign researchers. 

We record these numbers as part of the 

registration process. In some cases, 

researchers do not have either type of 

identification and present a school ID or 

some other proof of address. In these 

situations, it is not feasible to require a 

federally-approved ID and we do not 

have the right to limit one’s access to 

Federal records based on the absence of 

a Federally-approved ID. Of the other 

comments, one suggested that we accept 

the Library of Congress (LOC) researcher 

identification card. We rejected this 

comment because the Library of 

Congress and NARA are not connected 

administratively in any way. The 

Library of Congress is in the Legislative 

Branch and NARA is in the Executive 

Branch. Federal regulations apply to 

Executive Agencies only. Further, the 

NARA identification card is tied to a 

unique building security system shared 

by the National Archives Building in 

Washington, DC, and the National 

Archives at College Park. Another 

comment objected to having to carry 

another card and questioned how a card 

could make NARA more secure than 

using another common form of 

identification. Again, the application of 

the identification card is how we 

determine who is eligible to conduct 

research in our facility. The other forms 

of identification are required as proof of 

address to permit researcher access. The 

information must be standardized for 

both security purposes and for 

efficiently capturing administrative 

information on the characteristics of our 

users. Other forms of identification are 

not compatible with the computer 

system used for the registration process. 

This commenter also suggested that 

NARA record information from 

identification provided by the 

researcher upon each visit and that 

NARA also capture additional 

administrative information about each 

visit at that point. We rejected this 

comment because our current process is 

an OMB-approved information 

collection structured to minimize the 

paperwork burden on the public as 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act. Another comment requested that 

any denials of access be appealable to 

the Archivist of the United States. 

Federal regulation 36 CFR 1254.50 

already makes the Archivist of the 

United States the final determiner of 

research access when it has been denied 

at lower levels in the agency. Two 

commenters expressed doubt that the 

rule would improve security at the 

National Archives Building. The 

researcher identification cards are just 

one of several means employed by 

NARA that provide both physical and 

personal security. Because the cards are 

renewed annually, they provide the 

most reliable contact information 

available. Such information has proved 

useful in investigations conducted by 

the NARA Inspector General. 

What changes are we making in this 

rule? 

We are making substantive changes by 

amending the following sections: 

• § 1254.6(b): We are adding the 

requirement for researchers using the 

National Archives Building, even those 

only using microfilm publications or 

public use computers, to apply for and 

obtain a researcher identification card. 

This rule applies to regional archives 

facilities, as well, except where the 

microfilm research area is separate from 

the area where original records are used. 

We made other changes in the text to 

reflect that none of the affected facilities 

has more than one textual research 

room. 

• § 1254.22(a): The term ‘‘bar-coded’’ 

is deleted and replaced with the broader 

term ‘‘encoded.’’ We no longer use barcodes on researcher identification cards 

in the Washington, DC, area. The plastic 

cards we issue now have a magnetic 

strip and future cards may use other 

technology. 

• § 1254.44(a): Because fewer 

researchers are using microfilm and 

there are no waits, the 3-hour limit on 

use and waiting lists are no longer 

needed for the use of microfilm readers. 

We are removing references to the 3- 

hour limit. 

• § 1254.84: Since this section was 

last revised, the researcher 

identification card can be linked to a 

personal account established through 

the National Archives Trust Fund 

Cashier’s Office and function as a debit 

card in Washington, DC, area research 

rooms. The regulation is being clarified 

to describe that capability. In addition, 

we are removing discussion of deposit 

accounts, which are no longer 

maintained by the Trust Fund. 

We also are making non-substantive 

editorial changes in §§ 1254.6(c) and 

1254.10(b). 

Paperwork Reduction Act 

The information collection in this 

regulation was previously approved by 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES