alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Statistical Abstract

              																	Resolution Trust Corporation (U.S.). Office of Planning, Research, and Statistics					 and 	Resolution Trust Corporation (U.S.). 						*Statistical Abstract : August 1989/September 1995*,										1995,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/851,			accessed on September 8, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
# C_2017046EN.01001901.xml

| 13.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/19

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 December 2016 — IPSO v ECB

(Case T-713/14) (1)

1

((ECB - ECB staff - Interim employees - Restriction on the maximum length of service of an interim employee - Action for annulment - Act open to challenge - Directly and individually affected - Locus standi - Time limit for bringing proceedings - Admissibility - Failure to inform and consult the applicant union - Non-contractual liability))

(2017/C 046/21)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: International and European Public Services Organisation (IPSO) (Frankfurt-am-Main, Germany) (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented initially by: B. Ehlers, I. Köpfer and M. López Torres, and subsequently by: B. Ehlers, P. Pfeifhofer and F. Malfrère, acting as Agents, and B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of an act of the Executive Board of the ECB of 20 May 2014 restricting to two years the maximum period for which the ECB may avail itself of the services of any interim employee for administrative and secretarial tasks and, in addition, an action on the basis of Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for the non-pecuniary loss suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Executive Board of the ECB of 20 May 2014 restricting to two years the maximum period for which the ECB may avail itself of the services of any interim employee for administrative and secretarial tasks; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Executive Board of the ECB of 20 May 2014 restricting to two years the maximum period for which the ECB may avail itself of the services of any interim employee for administrative and secretarial tasks;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the action; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the action;

| 3. | Orders the ECB to bear its own costs and to pay three-quarters of the costs incurred by the International and European Public Services Organisation (IPSO). Orders IPSO to bear a quarter of its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the ECB to bear its own costs and to pay three-quarters of the costs incurred by the International and European Public Services Organisation (IPSO). Orders IPSO to bear a quarter of its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 431, 1.12.2014.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THERMO POWER
CORPORATION'S REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JULY 4, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                OCT-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                     JUL-04-1998
<CASH>                                25,920
<SECURITIES>                           4,114
<RECEIVABLES>                         67,912
<ALLOWANCES>                          13,556
<INVENTORY>                           47,487
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     147,596
<PP&E>                                38,641
<DEPRECIATION>                        13,255
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       339,190
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                112,463
<BONDS>                                  435
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                               1,249
<OTHER-SE>                            63,948
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         339,190
<SALES>                              197,039
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     197,039
<CGS>                                142,153
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        142,153
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       6,357
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         167
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     6,544
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        3,881
<INCOME-TAX>                           2,378
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    1,158
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                           1,158
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0.10
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          99,445
<SECURITIES>                                    17,080
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,362,578
<ALLOWANCES>                                 4,595,092
<INVENTORY>                                    298,819
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,207,404
<PP&E>                                       2,276,432
<DEPRECIATION>                                 762,596
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,815,494
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,229,060
<BONDS>                                      7,970,550
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           28,923
<PREFERRED>                                    739,696
<COMMON>                                    21,297,070
<OTHER-SE>                                 (20,449,805)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,815,494
<SALES>                                     11,463,796
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,516,488
<CGS>                                        8,971,763
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,414,941
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,784,637
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             794,573
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (5,477,663)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (5,477,663)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (5,477,663)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (1.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.44)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2014315EN.01006302.xml

| 15.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/63 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/63

---

Order of the General Court of 27 June 2014 — Mogyi v OHIM (Just crunch it...)

(Case T-9/14) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Revocation of the decision of the Board of Appeal - No need to adjudicate))

2014/C 315/106

Language of the case: Hungarian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Mogyi Kft (Csávoly, Hungary) (represented by: Zs. J. Klauber, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Sipos and A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 September 2013 (Case R 1922/2012-1) concerning an application for registration of the figurative mark Just crunch it... as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no further need to adjudicate on the present action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no further need to adjudicate on the present action.

| 2. | The defendant shall bear its own costs and those incurred by the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The defendant shall bear its own costs and those incurred by the applicant.

---

(1)  OJ C 71, 8.3.2014.

1

---
May 19, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

Docket No. FAA-2015-0719

This is an email response to Jake Troutman concerning the proposed UAS make/model/

type.

The UAS is a battery powered, quad-rotor, rotorcraft category UAS with the following 

specifications:

UAS Category Rotorcraft

Number of Rotors 4

Number of Engines 4

Manufacturer DJI

Model T600 (Inspire 1)

Basic Empty Weight (including camera) 2365 g (5.21 pounds)

Max Gross Weight (including camera) 2935 g (6.47 pounds)

Hovering Accuracy Vertical: .5 meters

Horizontal: 2.5 meters

Max Angular Velocity Pitch: 300o/s

Yaw: 150o/s

Max Pitch/Roll Attitude 35o

Max Ascent Speed 980 fpm

Max Descent Speed 780 fpm

Max Forward Speed 42.7 knots

Max Flight Endurance Time 18 minutes

Max Flight Altitude 14,700 MSL
Motor Model DJI 3510

Propeller Model DJI 1345

Operating Temperature Range -10o to 40o C

Dimensions 438x451x301 mm

Landing Gear Skid-type / Semi-Retractable

Remote Controller C1

Remote Operating Frequency 5.725-5.825 GHz;2.4-2.483 GHz

Remote Transmitting Distance 1.08 nm

Remote Power Supply Built-in battery

Remote Dual User Capability Host-and-Slave connection

Aircraft Battery Model TB47

Aircraft Battery Capacity 4500 mAh

Aircraft Battery Voltage 22.2 V

Aircraft Battery Type LiPo 6S High voltage battery

Aircraft Battery Energy 99.9 Wh

Aircraft Battery Weight 570 g (1.25 pounds)

Aircraft Battery Operating Temperature 

Range

-10o to 40o C

Sincerely,

Jordan Schultz

Schultz ATM

10418 Shire Country

San Antonio, TX 78254
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. NE I L R . B R OWN, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 10- 10187 D. C. No . 2 : 0 0 - c r - 0 0 4 3 4 - GEH ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia G a r l a nd E . B urr e l l , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d F e brua ry15, 2010 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , F E RN A N D E Z , an dM . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. N e i l R . B r ow n appe a l s f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s or de rde ny i ng hi s r e que s tf or e a r l yt e rm i na t i on of

s upe rvi s e d r e l e a s e pur s ua ntt o 18 U . S . C . § 3583( e ) . W e ha ve j u ri sd i ct i o n u n d er 2 8 U . S . C . § 1 2 9 1 , an dw e d i sm i ss. 

# FI LED FEB 22 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 10187 2 B r ow n c ont e nds tha tthe di s tr i c tc ourte rr e d w he n i tde ni e d hi s r e que s tf or earl y t erm i nat i on of supervi se d rel ea se . T he val i d and enforce abl e app ea l w ai ver s e t f o rth in th e p le aa g r e e m e n t p r e c lu d e s o u rr e v ie w o f th is is s u e . See U

ni ted States v. B i bl er , 4 9 5 F .3 d6 2 1 , 6 2 3 - 2 4 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 7 ) ; se e al so U ni ted States v. C ope , 5 2 7 F .3 d9 4 4 , 9 5 0 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 8 ) ( le n g th o f te rm o f s u p e rv is e dr e le a s e is p a rt o f th e s e n te n c e ) . W e th e r e f o r e e n f o r c e th e w a iv e ra n dd is m is s th e ap p e a l. DI S MI S S E D.
Editorial Note on Part 866
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 866 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 866.3860 *Trichomonas vaginalis* nucleic acid assay. ( a ) *Identification.* A *Trichomonas vaginalis* nucleic acid assay is a device that consists of primers, probes, enzymes, and controls for the amplification and detection of trichomonas nucleic acids in endocervical swabs, vaginal swabs, and female urine specimens, from women symptomatic for vaginitis, cervicitis, or urethritis and/or to aid in the diagnosis of trichomoniasis in asymptomatic women. The detection of trichomonas nucleic acids, in conjunction with other laboratory tests, aids in the clinical laboratory diagnosis of trichomoniasis caused by *Trichomonas vaginalis*.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls are set forth in FDA's guideline document entitled: “Class II Special Controls Guideline: Nucleic Acid Amplification Assays for the Detection of *Trichomonas vaginalis;* Guideline for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff.” See § 866.1(e) for information on obtaining this document.
[80 FR 46192, Aug. 4, 2015]
# C_2015381EN.01003301.xml

| 16.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 381/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 381/33

---

Order of the General Court of 16 September 2015 — Diapharm v Commission

(Case T-620/14) (1)

1

((Action for failure to act - Consumer protection - Health claims made on foods - Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 - Botanical substances - Time-limit for bringing an action - No legal interest in bringing proceedings - Act not amenable to review - Inadmissibility))

(2015/C 381/37)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Diapharm GmbH & Co. KG (Münster, Germany) (represented by: M. Weidner, N. Hußmann and T. Guttau, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Wilderspin and S. Grünheid, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application seeking a declaration that the Commission failed to act in that it unlawfully refrained from ordering the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) to evaluate the health claims relating to botanical substances as a condition prior to the adoption of the definitive list of authorised health claims in accordance with Article 13(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods (OJ 2006 L 404, p. 9).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Diapharm GmbH & Co. KG shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Diapharm GmbH & Co. KG shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 409, 17.11.2014.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS WHICH ARE INCLUDED IN THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED 9/30/99 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                    814241
<NAME>                   FORMICA CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                                               1,000
<CURRENCY>                                                U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                           SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                        1
<CASH>                                        8,300
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                88,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                  3,800
<INVENTORY>                                 124,800
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            245,000
<PP&E>                                      305,700
<DEPRECIATION>                               13,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              703,500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       114,200
<BONDS>                                     328,100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                        100
<OTHER-SE>                                   97,900
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                703,500
<SALES>                                     439,700
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            439,700
<CGS>                                       313,600
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               313,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            112,600
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           28,500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (15,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  2,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (17,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                (17,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 10, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-50929

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ERNESTO ALONSO QUINTERO-CRUZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-03-CR-517-ALL-PRM

--------------------

Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 Ernesto Alonso Quintero-Cruz appeals the sentence imposed

following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United

States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

Quintero-Cruz contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior

conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element

of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have

been alleged in his indictment. Quintero-Cruz maintains that he
No. 03-50929

-2-

pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry

under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds

the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed

for that offense.

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Quintero-Cruz acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
Editorial Note on Part 862
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 862 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 862.1509 Methylmalonic acid (nonquantitative) test system. ( a ) *Identification.* A methylmalonic acid (nonquantitative) test system is a device intended to identify methylmalonic acid in urine. The identification of methylmalonic acid in urine is used in the diagnosis and treatment of methylmalonic aciduria, a heritable metabolic disorder which, if untreated, may cause mental retardation.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9.
[52 FR 16122, May 1, 1987, as amended at 84 FR 71796, Dec. 30, 2019]
MICHAEL EDWARD

HOWARTH

,

Petitioner,

v.

JULIE L. JONES, Secretary,

Florida Department of Corrections

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE M OTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 1698

Opinion filed May 5, 2015.

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

-- Original Jurisdiction

.

Michael Edward Howarth, pro se , Petitioner.

Jennifer Parker, General Counsel, and Sus an A. Maher, Assistant General Counsel,

Department of Corrections, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

D ISMISSED.

WOLF, ROWE, and SWANSON, JJ., CONCUR.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

____________________________

No. 13-14989

Non-Argument Calendar

__________________________

D.C. Docket No. 4:11-cv-00145-BAE-GRS

THOMAS UHLIG, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DARBY BANK & TRUST CO., et al.,

Defendants, 

DRAYPROP, LLC,

DRAYPARK, LLC,

MICHAEL BROWN, 

MARLEY MANAGEMENT, INC.,

REUBEN CROLL, 

 Defendants – Appellants.

__________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Georgia

__________________________

(February 26, 2014)

Case: 13-14989 Date Filed: 02/26/2014 Page: 1 of 10 
2

Before TJOFLAT, MARCUS, and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The District Court granted appellee’s motions for summary judgment on 

appellant’s claims for breach of contract, negligent misrepresentation, and 

fraudulent misrepresentation, and entered judgment for appellees. Appellant 

appeals. We affirm the District Court’s judgment, finding no merit in appellant’s 

claims for the reasons stated in the District Court’s dispositive order of October 4, 

2013, which is attached as an appendix. 

AFFIRMED.

Case: 13-14989 Date Filed: 02/26/2014 Page: 2 of 10 
Case: 13-14989 Date Filed: 02/26/2014 Page: 3 of 10 
Case: 13-14989 Date Filed: 02/26/2014 Page: 4 of 10 
Case: 13-14989 Date Filed: 02/26/2014 Page: 5 of 10 
Case: 13-14989 Date Filed: 02/26/2014 Page: 6 of 10 
Case: 13-14989 Date Filed: 02/26/2014 Page: 7 of 10 
Case: 13-14989 Date Filed: 02/26/2014 Page: 8 of 10 
Case: 13-14989 Date Filed: 02/26/2014 Page: 9 of 10 
Case: 13-14989 Date Filed: 02/26/2014 Page: 10 of 10