alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1



                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

EARNINGS PER SHARE

The computation of basic and diluted earnings per share is as follows:
(In thousands, except per share data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                            Three Months Ended
                                               December 31,
                                        ------------------------
                                          1997             1996
                                        -------          -------
<S>                                      <C>              <C>   
Weighted average shares
outstanding                              10,591           10,566

Add equivalent shares for
stock options (a)                         1,515            1,286
                                        -------          -------

Average shares outstanding for
computation of earnings per
share                                    12,106           11,852
                                        =======          =======


Net Income                              $    82          $   682
                                        =======          =======



EARNINGS PER SHARE:

Basic                                   $   .01          $   .06
                                        =======          =======

Diluted                                 $.   01          $.   06
                                        =======          =======


<FN>
(a) Computed under the "Treasury Stock Method" using the average market price
    for the respective period.

</TABLE>





                                  Page 14 of 16
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Arthur Sweeney

*Arthur Sweeney,*pro se, on the motion.

Submitted March 24

decided April 1, 1969

The motion by the defendant for an extension of time to file a motion to reargue the appeal from the Superior Court in New Haven County at Waterbury is denied.
The Valley Air District covers eight counties inclu ding San Joaquin, Stanislaus, Merced, Madera, Fresn o, Kings, Tulare and the Valley air

basin portion of Kern. Visit www.valleyair.org to learn more. 

# News Release

For immediate release

5-5-2013

Attn: Local news, weather and assignment editors Media cell phone (559) 284-6317



## Gusty winds prompt health caution

Blowing dust in Merced, Tulare, Kings, Fresno, and the valley portion of Kern counties poses potential health concern

Local air pollution officials are issuing a health cautionary statement effective through this evening

, May 5, 2013, because of the potential for blowing d ust resulting from gusty winds. The health caution is in effect for Merced, Tulare, Kings, Fresno, and the valley portion of Kern counties.

Winds may produce areas of localized dust, which ca n result in unhealthy concentrations of particulate matter 10 microns and smaller (PM10). E xposure to particulate pollution can cause serious health problems, aggravate lung disease, trigger as thma attacks and bronchitis, and increase risk of respiratory infections.

Where conditions warrant, people with heart or lung disease should follow their doctors’ advice for dealing with episodes of particulate exposure. Addi tionally, older adults and children should avoid prolonged exposure or heavy exertion, depending on their local conditions.

Residents can check the nearest air monitor to thei r location to determine localized conditions. Visit the Real-time Air Advisory Network page on the Dist rict’s website to subscribe for free: http://www.valleyair.org/Programs/RAAN/raan_landing .htm

.

For more information, visit www.valleyair.org or call a District office in Fresno (559-230-6000)

, Modesto (209-557-6400) or Bakersfield (661-381-1809 ).
# C_2017277EN.01003101.xml

| 21.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 277/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 277/31

---

Judgment of the General Court of 29 June 2017 — Cipriani v EUIPO — Hotel Cipriani (CIPRIANI)

(Case T-343/14) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark CIPRIANI - No bad faith - Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - No breach of the right to a name of a well-known person - Article 53(2)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009))

(2017/C 277/45)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Arrigo Cipriani (Venice, Italy) (represented by: A. Vanzetti, G. Sironi and S. Bergia, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Hotel Cipriani Srl (Venice) (represented: initially by C. Hoole, Solicitor, and subsequently by T. Alkin, B. Brandreth, Barristers, W. Sander, P. Cantrill, M. Pearce, A. Hall and A. Ward, Solicitors, and finally by B. Brandreth, Barrister, and A. Poulter and P. Brownlow, Solicitors)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 March 2014 (Case R 224/2012-4), relating to proceedings for a declaration of invalidity between Arrigo Cipriani and Hotel Cipriani

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Arrigo Cipriani to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and those of Hotel Cipriani Srl. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Arrigo Cipriani to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and those of Hotel Cipriani Srl.

---

(1)  OJ C 261, 11.8.2014.

1

---
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.1

                       SUBSIDIARIES OF MACKIE DESIGNS INC.
                            AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998


                                            State of Incorporation or
Subsidiary                                  Country in which Organized
--------------------------------------    --------------------------------

Mackie Sales Corporation                    Barbados
Mackie Designs Manufacturing Inc.           Washington
Mackie Designs (Netherlands) B.V.           The Netherlands
Mackie Designs (Italy) S.r.l.               Italy
Novac S.r.l.                                Italy
Radio Cine Forniture (RCF) S.p.A.           Italy
AVM S.r.l.                                  Italy
RCF Artesuono S.r.l.                        Italy
Elettronica International S.r.l.            Italy
RCF France S.A.                             France
RCF Electronics (U.K.) Ltd.                 United Kingdom
RCF North America Inc.                      New Jersey
RCF China Limited                           China
RCF Deutschland GmbH                        Germany
Filed 10/17/06 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2006 ND 199

In the Interest of K.S., a child

In the Interest of R.P., a child

---------------

Carrie Smith, L.S.W., 

Cass County Social Services, Petitioner and Appellee

v.

J.P., B.P., father, K.S., a child, 

R.P., a child, and Dixie Evans or her

designee, Lay Guardian ad Litem,   Respondents

and 

T.S., mother, Respondent and Appellant

No. 20050397

In the Interest of B.P., a child

---------------

Kathy Setness, L.S.W.,

Cass County Social Services,      Petitioner and Appellee

v.

B.P., a child, B.P., Father, Respondents

and

T.S., mother,  Respondent and Appellant

No. 20050398

Appeals from the Juvenile Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Janice B. Johnson, Referee.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Lori Kim Weisz, 1012 Lincoln Avenue, Harvey, N.D. 58341, for respondent and appellant.

Pam H. Ormand, Assistant State’s Attorney, Cass County Courthouse, P.O. Box 3106, Fargo, N.D. 58108-3106, for petitioner and appellee.

Interest of K.S.

Nos. 20050397 & 20050398

Per Curiam.

[¶1]T.S. appeals from an order terminating her parental rights to K.S. and R.P., alleging there was no clear and convincing evidence that the causes of deprivation of the children were likely to continue or that there would be substantial harm to the children if termination were not ordered.  She also argues a guardianship would best serve K.S. and R.P.’s interests and reasonable efforts were not made to unify her family. 

[¶2]T.S. also appeals from an order establishing a guardianship for B.P., alleging it was unnecessary. 

[¶3]We conclude the juvenile court’s findings of fact supporting the orders are not clearly erroneous and summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).  

[¶4]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Daniel J. Crothers

Dale V. Sandstrom

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Mary Muehlen Maring
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ebix, Inc. (the “Company”) for the periodended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robin Raina, Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2. The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| By:       /s/  Robin Raina |
|----------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                     |
| Name:  Robin  Raina                                 |
|                                                     |
| Chief Executive Officer                                  |
|                                                     |
| October 31, 2007                                         |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1

# CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

I, Brian F. Lavin, certify, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

To the best of my knowledge and
belief, the quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on November 13, 2003, by NTS-Properties VII, Ltd. (the Periodic
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
NTS-Properties VII, Ltd.

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to NTS-Properties VII, Ltd. and will
be retained by NTS-Properties VII, Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ Brian F. Lavin

---

President of NTS Capital Corporation,
General Partner of NTS-Properties Associates VII,
General Partner of NTS-Properties VII, Ltd.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BAB HOLDINGS, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED NOVEMBER 30,
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN THE ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1998
<CASH>                                         700,162
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,296,475
<ALLOWANCES>                                   361,000
<INVENTORY>                                    298,501
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,591,036
<PP&E>                                       5,945,997
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,743,800
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,444,991
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,941,370
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,548,731
<COMMON>                                    11,430,452
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,751,221)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,444,991
<SALES>                                      8,929,664
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,549,240
<CGS>                                        3,309,504
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,034,085
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (54,022)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             206,618
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                482,803
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (163,961)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            646,764
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   498,900
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
        



</TABLE>
[LETTERHEAD OF CHARLES E. LINCOLN]

May 11, 2000

John Ackerman
Chairman of the Board
COMC, Inc.
400 North Glenoaks Blvd.
Burbank, California 91502

Dear Mr. Ackerman,

Effective today's date, May 11, 2000, I hereby resign from the COMC, Inc.
Board of Directors.

Sincerely,

/s/ Charles E. Lincoln
----------------------
Charles E. Lincoln
<Page>


                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Pierre Francoeur, President and Chief Executive Officer of Sun
Media Corporation (the "Company"), have reviewed the Annual Report of the
Company on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), and
based on the inquiries I have made or caused to be made in the fulfillment of
my responsibilities as the President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that for the periods covered by
the Report:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                           /s/ Pierre Francoeur
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Pierre Francoeur
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           March 31, 2003


THIS CERTIFICATE IS BEING MADE FOR THE EXCLUSIVE PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE BY THE
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF THE COMPANY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 906, AND
SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO BE A PART OF THE REPORT OR FILED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE.

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO SUN MEDIA CORPORATION AND WILL BE RETAINED BY SUN MEDIA CORPORATION
AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON
REQUEST.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 50505

GG RANCH, LIMITED; HORTON RANCHES, INCORPORATED; LLOYD TSCHIRHART; DANCY TSCHIRHART; EAKIN RANCHES, LIMITED; RUSTY ULBRICH,

Plaintiffs

- Appellants

v.

EDWARDS AQUIFER AUTHORITY; ROLANDO RUIZ, in his official capacity as general man ager; CITY OF SAN ANTONIO, Acting by and through the San Antonio Water System (SAWS),

Defendants

- Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:14

- CV

- 848

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, PRADO, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM: *
Appellants, owners of certain real property located above the Edwards
Aquifer in Medina and Uvalde Counties, Texas, sued the state regulatory
agency in charge of the Aquifer, the Edwards Aquifer Authority, alleging

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED May 5, 2016
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-50505 Document: 00513494308 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/05/2016No. 15

- 50505

2 violations under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States

Constitution and Article 1, § 17 of the Texas Constitution. Appellants’ suit
followed the Authority’ s denial of their untimely applications for with drawal
permits for their properties. The district court, pursuant to Federa l Rule of
Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), dismissed all claims with prejudice.
We have considered this appeal on the basis of the briefs, the pertinent
portions of the record, and the applicable law. Having done so, the judgment is
affirmed, essentially for the reasons stated in the Order of the district court.

AFFIRMED. Case: 15-50505 Document: 00513494308 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/05/2016
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

MICHAEL VANN,

Petitioner

v.

PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF 

PROBATION AND PAROLE,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 2 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of May, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
§ 582.1193 Calcium chloride. ( a ) *Product.* Calcium chloride.
( b ) *Conditions of use.* This substance is generally recognized as safe when used in accordance with good manufacturing or feeding practice.
### Swanson. Brian,(OST) DOT

.. OST-

## 200§**-1;E~** /") From: John Bell [John_beIl1 @verizon.net] Sent: Friday, February 26, 2010 2:34 PM To: Devany, Dennis (OST); Swanson, Brian (OST) Cc: gpjt@charter.net;jaimetrautman@gmail.com Subject: Fw: Cape Airv.Colgan Air


### In paragraph, line3 of mye-mail below, the sentence should begin: "Quiteoften notall the seats 

### * * *

Before voicing an opinion on the merits of whether Cape Air or Colgan Air should be approved as our area's Essential Air Service (EAS) provider, Ihavewaited until I felt comfortable in making an informed decision. After reviewing all information that I have been able to gather, including a conversation with our extremely able area legislator, Dr. Robert Heins, and a thoughtful opinion letter written byAndrew Schonbek, a business and civic leader in Clinton County, that appeared in the Press Republican on February 13, 2010, I believe that itwould be a great mistake to shiftfrom Cape Airto Cogan Air. Since retiring as a judge of the New York State Courtof Claims, mywife and I have been required to fly frequentlyto Boston because of serious medical procedures that I have been required to undergo. The service thatwe have received from Cape Air has been exemplary. Quite often, all the seats have been been taken. One one occasion, mywife and I were the only passengers. I do not believe that atthis pOint intime an airplane with greaterseating capacitythan that of Cape Air is necessary. The costto passengers 'flying to Boston will be greater if Colgan Air is used. I believe that anyone who believes that once Colgan Air is the provider its rates will not be raised substantiallywill soon learn that the rates will be increased. Iaskthatyou determine whether Colgan Airdoes have, as stated by Mr.Schonbek, "a track record of aggressively increasing prices in other markets in which it has been awarded EAS contracts. II If Cape Air is satisfying the needs of ourcitizens and Colgan Air is seeking a federal subsidy 59 percent higherthan that of Cape Air,one would thinkthat such factor indeed would have a controlling effect.
I urge that therecommendation by a majority only of county legislators should only be one factorwith respect to an informed and ultimate decision and certainly not contrOlling, especially in view of financial problems with which ourgovernment is faced.

1
Editorial Note on Part 874
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 874 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 874.4720 Mediastinoscope and accessories. ( a ) *Identification.* A mediastinoscope and accessories is a tubular tapered electrical endoscopic device with any of a group of accessory devices which attach to the mediastinoscope and is intended to examine or treat tissue in the area separating the lungs. The device is inserted transthoracicly and is used in diagnosis of tumors and lesions and to determine whether excision of certain organs or tissues is indicated. It is typically used with a fiberoptic light source and carrier to provide illumination. The device is made of materials such as stainless steel. This generic type of device includes the flexible foreign body claw, flexible biopsy forceps, rigid biopsy curette, flexible biopsy brush, rigid biopsy forceps, and flexible biopsy curette, but excludes the fiberoptic light source and carrier.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II.
Exhibit 32

# CERTIFICATION

The undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:

(1)    The accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the period ended September 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in the accompanying
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:   November 4, 2005

|: | /s/   Marti Morfitt                               
|- | --------------------------------------------------
|  | Marti Morfitt, President & Chief Executive Officer

Date:   November 4, 2005

|: | /s/   Samuel E. Reinkensmeyer                                                         
|- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  | Samuel E. ReinkensmeyerVice President of Finance, ChiefFinancial Officer and Treasurer

---
# C_2015065EN.01003401.xml

| 23.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 65/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 65/34

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 January 2015 — Melt Water v OHIM (Shape of a transparent cylindrical bottle)

(Case T-70/14) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Application for a three-dimensional Community trade mark - Shape of a transparent cylindrical bottle - Absolute grounds for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2015/C 065/47)

Language of the case: Lithuanian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Research and Production Company ‘Melt Water’ UAB (Klaipėda, Lithuania) (represented by: V. Viešūnaitė, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: V. Melgar, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 November 2013 (Case R 481/2013-5), concerning an application for registration of a three-dimensional sign comprising the shape of a transparent cylindrical bottle as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Research and Production Company ‘Melt Water’ UAB to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Research and Production Company ‘Melt Water’ UAB to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 112, 14.4.2014.

1

---