alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 740.11 Cosmetics in self-pressurized containers. ( a ) ( 1 ) The label of a cosmetic packaged in a self-pressurized container and intended to be expelled from the package under pressure shall bear the following warning: *Warning*—Avoid spraying in eyes. Contents under pressure. Do not puncture or incinerate. Do not store at temperature above 120 °F. Keep out of reach of children.
( 2 ) In the case of products intended for use by children, the phrase “except under adult supervision” may be added at the end of the last sentence in the warning required by paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
( 3 ) In the case of products packaged in glass containers, the word “break” may be substituted for the word “puncture” in the warning required by paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
( 4 ) The words “Avoid spraying in eyes” may be deleted from the warning required by paragraph (a)(1) of this section in the case of a product not expelled as a spray.
( b ) ( 1 ) In addition to the warning required by paragraph (a)(1) of this section, the label of a cosmetic packaged in a self-pressurized container in which the propellant consists in whole or in part of a halocarbon or a hydrocarbon shall bear the following warning: *Warning*—Use only as directed. Intentional misuse by deliberately concentrating and inhaling the contents can be harmful or fatal.
( 2 ) The warning required by paragraph (b)(1) of this section is not required for the following products: ( i ) Products expelled in the form of a foam or cream, which contain less than 10 percent propellant in the container.
( ii ) Products in a container with a physical barrier that prevents escape of the propellant at the time of use.
( iii ) Products of a net quantity of contents of less than 2 ozs. that are designed to release a measured amount of product with each valve actuation.
( iv ) Products of a net quantity of contents of less than 1 ⁄ 2 oz.
( c ) Labeling requirements for cosmetics packaged in a self- pressurized container containing or manufactured with a chlorofluorocarbon propellant or other ozone-depleting substance designated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) are set forth in 40 CFR part 82.
[40 FR 8917, Mar. 3, 1975, as amended at 42 FR 22033, Apr. 29, 1977; 54 FR 39640, Sept. 27, 1989; 61 FR 20101, May 3, 1996]
Exhibit 32

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Solelyin connection with the filing of the Annual Report of Retractable Technologies,Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2010, asfiled with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Thomas J. Shaw, Chief Executive Officer,and Douglas W. Cowan, Chief Financial Officer, do hereby certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date:       June 9, 2011

 
|   | /S/  THOMAS J. SHAW                                                          |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | THOMAS  J. SHAW                                                              |
|   | PRESIDENT,  CHAIRMAN, AND                                                    |
|   | CHIEF  EXECUTIVE OFFICER                                                     |
|   |                                                                         |
|   | /S/  DOUGLAS W. COWAN                                                        |   |
|   | DOUGLAS  W. COWAN                                                            |
|   | VICE  PRESIDENT, CHIEF FINANCIAL  OFFICER, AND PRINCIPAL  ACCOUNTING OFFICER |
|        |                                                                              |        |  |

 

----
# C_2014388EN.01003201.xml

| 3.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 388/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 388/32

---

Action brought on 14 August 2014 — ZZ v Committee of the Regions

(Case F-81/14)

2014/C 388/41

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: J.-N. Louis, D. de Abreu Caldas and R. Metz, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Committee of the Regions

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision not to promote the applicant to the next grade (AD 13) in the 2013 promotion procedure of the Committee of the Regions.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

| — | annul the Committee of the Regions’ decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 13 in the 2013 promotion procedure; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Committee of the Regions’ decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 13 in the 2013 promotion procedure;

| — | order the Committee of the Regions to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Committee of the Regions to pay the costs.

---
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Employment, Growth, and Price Levels

              																	United States. Congress. Joint Economic Committee, 1956-					 and 	Eighty-Sixth Congress, 1959-1961. 						*Employment, Growth, and Price Levels : Report of the Joint Economic Committee, Congress of the United States, Pursuant to S. Con. Res. 13, 86th Congress, 1st Session, with Minority, Supplemental, and Additional Views*,												Washington: 								Government Printing Office, 										1960,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/1246,			accessed on September 26, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Budget Highlights

              																	United States. Office of Management and Budget. 						*Budget Highlights*,										Fiscal Year 1973,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/386,			accessed on September 6, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
#### § 640.60 Source Plasma.

The proper name of the product shall be Source Plasma. The product is defined as the fluid portion of human blood collected by plasmapheresis and intended as source material for further manufacturing use. The definition excludes single donor plasma products intended for intravenous use.

[41 FR 10768, Mar. 12, 1976, as amended at 50 FR 4140, Jan. 29, 1985]
#### § 720.5 [Reserved]
#### *In re*SLOMAN’S ESTATE.

Executors and Administrators — Removal—Equity—Parties.

Where petitioners, legatees under the will of a decedent, were entitled to file a bill in their own right for an accounting against the surviving members of a firm in which decedent had been a partner, who were joined as executors in testator’s will, it was unnecessary to enter an order removing the executors and granting the right to sue in the name of the executor in securing an accounting; the court of equity never undertaking to perform an unnecessary act, the court on appeal will vacate an order of the circuit court removing the executors and authorizing complainants to sue in the. name, of the estate in instituting proceedings.

Appeal from Wayne; Collingwood, J., presiding.

Submitted April 12, 1915.

(Docket No. 36.)

Decided June 7, 1915.

Petition by Cora F. Sloman and others for an order of the probate court for the county of Wayne to permit petitioners to start a suit for accounting in the name of the executor of the estate of Mark Sloman, deceased, and for the appointment of an administrator for the purpose of defense. From an order granting the prayer of the petition, defendant estate appealed to the circuit court. The order was affirmed. Defendants appeal.

Reversed.

*James O. Mur fin*and *Sloman & Sloman,*for appellants.

*Robert E. Barber,*for appellee Eugene H. Sloman.

*Henry B. Graves,*for appellee Samuel A. Sloman.

Kuhn, J.

This is an appeal from an order made by the circuit judge granting leave to use the name *441of Adolph Sloman, an executor of the estate of Mark Sloman, deceased, for the purpose of prosecuting chancery proceedings for an accounting against the surviving members of the firm of M. Sloman *&*Co., to ascertain the interest of the estate of Mark Sloman therein.

This cause was tried in the circuit court, together with the case of the appeal of Samuel A. Sloman and Adolph Sloman from an order removing the executors. Separate appeals in each case were taken to this court, and a statement of the facts giving rise to these appeals is found in the opinion of this court, written by Mr. Justice Stone, in the removal proceeding, and handed down herewith. *Ante,*434 (152 N. W. 957).

As we concluded in that case that the appellees have a standing in equity, possessing such an interest in the estate as will entitle them to file a bill in their own behalf against the surviving members of the firm, the executors, and such legatees as refused to join them as complainants, .and being also of the opinion that the court should not do an unnecessary thing, the order removing the executors was reversed. In view of this conclusion, it follows that for the same reasons the order here involved should be reversed, with costs, and the petition dismissed.

Brooke, C. J., and McAlvay, Stone, Ostrander, Bird, Moore, and Steere, JJ„ concurred.
From: Chuck French/RTP/USEPA/US

To: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov >

Cc: Amy Branning/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Paula VanLare/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Sharon

Nizich/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Steve Fruh/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Wendy

Blake/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 04/12/2010 04:51 PM

Subject: RE: Interagency comments under EO 12866 on the Gold Ore Processing

NESHAP Draft NPRM

Hi Heidi,

Attached is a list of the 23 gold mines in the U.S. that we believe will

be subject to the MACT based on our data. Also attached is a list of the 7

facilities that we estimate will need the most reductions.

Let me know if you have questions.

Thanks.

Chuck

(See attached file: Table

‐ location

‐ of

‐ gold

‐ mines

‐ 4

‐ 12

‐ 2010.xls)(See

attached file: Locations of Impacted Gold Mine Facilities.doc)NewmontPhoenixBATTLENVTable 1. List of Gold Mine Ore Processing and Production Facilities (draft - 4/12/10).Company and Facility nameNearest CityStateQueenstake - Jerritt Canyon MineELKONVNewmont Mining Corp. - Gold QuarryCARLINNVBarrick Goldstrike MinesELKONVNewmont Mining Corp. - Twin Creeks MineGOLCONDANVNewmont Mining Corp. - Lone Tree MineVALMYNVBarrick Gold Corp. - Cortez Gold MinesCRESCENT VALLEYNVMarigold Mining Company - Marigold Mine (Glamis)VALMYNVFlorida Canyon Mining - Florida Canyon MineIMLAYNVBarrick - Bald Mountain MineELKONVBarrick - Homestake Mining - Ruby Hill Proj.EUREKANVBarrick and Kinross - Round Mt. Gold - Smoky Valley Common OpROUND MOUNTAINNVCoeur D'Alene Corp. - Coeur Rochester MineLOVELOCKNVNewmont Mining Corp. - Midas OperationsMIDASNVKennecott - Denton-Rawhide MineFALLONNVNewmont MininCor. - Phoenix Mingp.eBATTLE MOUNTAINMOUNTAINNVKinross - Fort Knox MineFAIRBANKSAKKennecott Greens Creek Mining CompanyJUNEAUAKPogo Mine - Teck-Pogo, IncDELTAAKBarrick - Golden Sunlight Mines, IncWHITEHALLMTMontana Tunnels Mining, Inc.JEFFERSON CTYMTWestern Mesquite Mines, Inc. - Mesquite MineBRAWLEYCAKinross - Echo Bay Minerals - Kettle RiverKETTLE RIVERWACripple Creek and Victor Gold Mining CompanyVICTORCONames and Locations of Gold Mine Facilities that weestimate will need the most reductions (draft - 4/12/2010)No.Company NameFacility NameFacility Location (nearestcity)StateEstimated mercuryreduction (lb/yr)1Newmont Mining CorporationTwin CreeksGolcondaNV6862Barrick Gold CorporationBald Mountain /Huntington ValleyElkoNV2153Newmont Mining CorporationLone TreeValmyNV1944Newmont Mining CorporationGold QuarryCarlinNV1415Queenstake Resources USA,Inc.JerrittCanyonElkoNV1316Barrick Gold CorporationGoldstrikeElkoNV1097Jipangu Inc.Florida CanyonImlayNV98
| (logo) WELLS

           FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334

 

  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

** **

** **

Reference is herebymade to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1,2015, by and among Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., as Depositor, Wells FargoBank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, ADivision of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, Park BridgeLender Services LLC, as Trust Advisor, Wilmington Trust, National Association,as Trustee, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as CertificateAdministrator, Certificate Registrar, Authenticating Agent and Custodian withrespect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-C24 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section13.9 of the Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.           A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period fromJanuary 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.           To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day ofFebruary 2019.

 

 

/s/ Leslie Hayton

Leslie Hayton 

Managing Director

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
Editorial Note on Part 868
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 868 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 868.5975 Ventilator tubing. ( a ) *Identification.* Ventilator tubing is a device intended for use as a conduit for gases between a ventilator and a patient during ventilation of the patient.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 868.9.
[47 FR 31142, July 16, 1982, as amended at 61 FR 1120, Jan. 16, 1996; 66 FR 38796, July 25, 2001]
Opinion issued April 18 , 2023

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 22 - 00888 - CV

——————————— CHARLES NELSON , Appella nt

V. JOSH VATH AND JANET VATH , Appell e e s
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No . 3

Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. CV - 0087557

MEMORANDUM OPINION This is an appeal from a judgment signed October 25, 2022. Appellant ha s
not paid for the clerk’s record or the required filing fee and has not established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 5, 20.1 (indigence), 37.3(b) (allowing dismissal of appeal if no clerk’s record filed due to appellant’s2

fault) ; see also T EX
. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN
. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a), 101.04 1; Order Regarding Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi

- District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 1 5

- 91 58

. Appellant failed to respond to our notices of December 22, 2022 (past due filing fee) and December 27, 2022 (non

- payment for the clerk’s record), that, should appellant not pay the fee for the clerk’s record or the filing fee or establish indigence, this appeal was subject to dismissal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule) , 37.3(b) (allowing dismissal of appeal if no clerk’s record filed due to appellant’s fault) , 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case). Appellant has not responded to this Court’s notices.
We dismiss the appeal . W e dismiss a ny pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Kelly and Goodman.
Exhibit 10.4
  (EXIDE LOGO)Exide Technologies13000 Deerfield ParkwayBldg. 200Milton, GA 30004Telephone: 678.566.9000www.Exide.com
     The Wall Street Journal




---



##### 



provided however
 
 ***
    
    CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL REDACTED AND SEPARATELY FILED WITH THE COMMISSION.***




---



##### 



Barbara A. Hatcher




---



##### 



EXIDE TECHNOLOGIES
2004 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
 Exhibit A
 Designation of Beneficiary
 Award Agreement Company Recipient
 Name of Beneficiary:Address:Social Security No.:
  Date:By:Barbara A. Hatcher
 
 Notary PublicCounty ofState of
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FORM THE RESTATED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF HARBINGER CORPORATION FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          35,697
<SECURITIES>                                    29,844
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,418
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,425
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                95,640
<PP&E>                                          25,706
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,780
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 131,199
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           35,248
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                      94,115
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   131,199
<SALES>                                         43,020
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                89,245
<CGS>                                            6,766
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,112
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                76,800
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 224
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (15,037)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       996
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (16,033)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     (30)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (16,091)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.46)
        

</TABLE>
§ 589.1 Substances prohibited from use in animal food or feed. ( a ) The substances listed in this part have been prohibited from use in animal food or feed by the Food and Drug Administration because of a determination that they present a potential risk to the public health or have not been shown by adequate scientific data to be safe for use in such food or feed. Use of any of these substances in violation of this part causes the animal food or feed involved to be adulterated and in violation of the Act.
( b ) This part includes only a partial list of substances prohibited from use in animal food or feed; it is for easy reference purposes and is not a complete list of substances that may not lawfully be used in such animal food or feed. No substance may be used in animal food or feed unless it meets all applicable requirements of the Act.
( c ) The Food and Drug Administration either on its own initiative or on behalf of any interested person who has submitted a petition, may publish a proposal to establish, amend, or repeal a regulation under this part on the basis of new scientific evaluation or information. Any such petition shall include an adequate scientific basis to support the petition, shall be the form set forth in § 571.1 of this chapter, and will be published in the Federal Register for comment if it contains reasonable ground.
[45 FR 28319, Apr. 29, 1980]