alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016454EN.01002201.xml

| 5.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 454/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 454/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 October 2016 — August Wolff and Remedia v Commission

(Case T-672/14) (1)

((Medicinal products for human use - Article 31 of Directive 2001/83/EC - Article 116 of Directive 2001/83 - Active substance estradiol - Commission decision ordering the Member States to withdraw or amend national marketing authorisations for medicinal products with 0,01 % estradiol by weight for topical use - Burden of proof - Proportionality - Equal treatment))

(2016/C 454/40)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel (Bielefeld, Germany) and Remedia d.o.o (Zagreb, Croatia) (represented by: P. Klappich, C. Schmidt and P. Arbeiter, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B.-R. Killmann and A. Sipos, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking the annulment of Commission Decision C(2014) 6030 final of 19 August 2014 concerning, in the framework of Article 31 of Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, the marketing authorisations for high concentration of estradiol containing human medicinal products for topical use in so far as it requires Member States to comply with the obligations imposed in the implementing decision for the medicinal products listed in Annex I to the implementing decision and those not listed with 0,01 % estradiol by weight for topical use, with the exception of the restriction that the medicinal products named in Annex I to the implementing decision with 0,01 % estradiol by weight for topical use may be administered only intravaginally.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel and Remedia d.o.o. to pay the costs of the proceedings and of those relating to the application for interim measures. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel and Remedia d.o.o. to pay the costs of the proceedings and of those relating to the application for interim measures.

---

(1)  OJ C 439, 8.12.2014.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from IDS Managed
Futures II, L.P. for the first quarter of 1998 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000813831
<NAME> IDS MANAGED FUTURES II, L.P.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      12,054,781
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,733
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,094,514
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,094,514
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          225,072
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,869,443
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,094,514
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              (22,532)
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  250,362
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (272,893)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (272,893)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (272,893)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (14.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (14.17)
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 862
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 862 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 862.1235 Cyclosporine test system. ( a ) *Identification.* A cyclosporine test system is a device intended to quantitatively determine cyclosporine concentrations as an aid in the management of transplant patients receiving therapy with this drug. This generic type of device includes immunoassays and chromatographic assays for cyclosporine.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special control is “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Cyclosporine and Tacrolimus Assays; Guidance for Industry and FDA.” See § 862.1(d) for the availability of this guidance document.
[67 FR 58329, Sept. 16, 2002]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, John P. Wilmers, Chief Executive Officer of Ballantyne of Omaha, Inc. (the "Company"), has executed this certification in connection with
the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Report").

The
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge that:



IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 30th day of June 2008.

|/s/JOHN P. WILMERSJohn P. Wilmers
Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Ballantyne of Omaha, Inc. and will be retained by
Ballantyne of Omaha, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                      $1,175,895
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            $1,213,254
<PP&E>                                     $22,226,642
<DEPRECIATION>                              $5,932,355
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             $17,507,541
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         $240,476
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   ($62,014)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               $17,507,541
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              $910,674
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 $520.801
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                $5,380
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            $403,662
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              ($19,169)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          ($19,169)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 ($19,169)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  ($1.94)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  ($1.94)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2016251EN.01002402.xml

| 11.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 251/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 251/24

---

Judgment of the General Court of 1 June 2016 — Hungary v Commission

(Case T-662/14) (1)

1

((Common Agricultural Policy - Direct payments - Additional criteria for ecological focus areas with short rotation coppice - Article 45(8) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014 - Article 46(9)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 - Misuse of power - Legal certainty - Non-discrimination - Legitimate expectations - Right to property - Obligation to state reasons))

(2016/C 251/26)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Hungary (represented by: M. Fehér and G. Koós, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: H. Kranenborg, A. Sipos and G. von Rintelen, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the part of the first sentence of Article 45(8) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014 of 11 March 2014 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing rules for direct payments to farmers under support schemes within the framework of the common agricultural policy and amending Annex X to that Regulation (OJ 2014 L 181, p. 1), which states the following: ‘by selecting from the list established pursuant to Article 4(2)(c) of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 the species that are most suitable from an ecological perspective, thereby excluding species that are clearly not indigenous’.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Hungary to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Hungary to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 448, 15.12.2014.

1

---
# C_2016027EN.01005001.xml

| 25.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 27/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 27/50

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 December 2015 — Giand v OHIM — Flamagas (FLAMINAIRE)

(Case T-583/14) (1)

1

((Community mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark FLAMINAIRE - Earlier national and international word marks FLAMINAIRE - Relative grounds for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Genuine use of the earlier mark - Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Ne bis in idem))

(2016/C 027/62)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Giand Srl (Rimini, Italy) (represented by: F. Caricato, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Bullock, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Flamagas, SA (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: G. Hinarejos Mulliez, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 June 2014 (Case R 2117/2011-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Flamagas, SA and Giand Srl.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Giand Srl to pay the costs, including those necessarily incurred by Flamagas, SA for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Giand Srl to pay the costs, including those necessarily incurred by Flamagas, SA for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).

---

(1)  OJ C 351, 6.10.2014.

1

---
#### Wilson *v.*The State.

[No. 19,413.

Filed April 5, 1901.]

Appeal and Error. *—Moot Question.*— Dismissal.—The action of the court in refusing to admit defendant to bail will not be, reviewed on appeal where, shortly after the overruling of his application, and pending the appeal, defendant was tried upon the indictment and , acquitted.

From the Franklin Circuit Court.

*'Appeal dismissed. ■*

*3. O’Hair, A. J. Boss*and *G.3. Mullin,*for appellant.

*W. L. Taylor,*Attorney-General, *O. O. Hadley, Merrill Moores, G. L. Gray*and *8. 8. Harrell,*for State.

Baker, J.

Appellant, while under indictment for murder, sought to be admitted to bail. This appeal questions .the correctness of the court’s ruling in denying his applica*418lion.' The Attorney-General interposes a motion to dismiss on tbe’ground that appellant, shortly after the overruling of his application, was tried upon the indictment and acquitted. That fact being admitted, it is apparent that nothing but a moot question is presented by the record. Such a question this court'will not'pass upon simply for the'purpose of determining the liability for costs. *State*v. *Board, etc.,*153 Ind. 302; *Chicago, etc., Co.*v. *Lewis, ante,*232.

Appeal dismissed.'
Exhibit
14.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference
in the Registration Statements (Forms F-3 No. 333-12096, No. 333-13550
and No. 333-84510 and Form S-8 No. 333-106591) of Deutsche Telekom AG
and in the related Prospectuses of our report dated April 24, 2002,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Ben Nederland
Holding B.V. included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F/A for the year
ended December 31, 2003.

June 25, 2004

PricewaterhouseCoopers Accountants
N.V.Amsterdam, The Netherlands

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 11.2

                             WEBLINK WIRELESS, INC.
                    COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (LOSS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999
                                                           -----------------------------------------
                                                             NUMBER         PERCENT       EQUIVALENT
                                                           OF SHARES      OUTSTANDING       SHARES
                                                           ---------      -----------       ------
<S>                                                       <C>             <C>            <C>
COMMON STOCK
   From Founders' Stock                                    2,300,000       100.00%         2,300,000
   Stock Options Exercised                                 1,316,931        92.82%         1,222,319
   Preferred Stock Converted to Common Stock              15,310,943       100.00%        15,310,943
   1994 Common Stock Offerings                            11,242,857       100.00%        11,242,857
   1995 Common Stock Offerings                             4,323,874       100.00%         4,323,874
   1996 Common Stock Offering                              6,000,000       100.00%         6,000,000
   1999 Treasury Stock Transaction                            (6,588)       43.47%            (2,864)
   Employee Stock Purchase Plan Shares Issued                145,737        87.55%           127,598
   Warrants Exercised                                        130,513       100.00%           130,513
                                                         -----------                     -----------
                                                          40,764,267                      40,655,240

WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING                                                       40,655,240

NET LOSS                                                                                 (25,072,717)

NET LOSS PER SHARE                                                                            ($0.62)
                                                                                         ===========
</TABLE>
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D2022-2957

LT Case No. 2019-CA-3310

_____________________________

PETER ALLEN ANDERSON, 

Appellant,

v.

SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, et 

al., 

Appellees. 

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County. 

Gary L. Sweet, Judge. 

Peter Allen Anderson, South Bay, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jessica 

Schwieterman and Samantha-Josephine Baker, Assistant 

Attorneys General, Tampa, for Appellees. 

May 31, 2024

PER CURIAM.

Due to Appellant’s apparent abuse of the legal process by his 

abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous pro se filings attacking 

his judgment and sentence in Seminole County Circuit Court Case 

No. 2019-CA-3310, this Court issued an order directing Appellant 

to show cause why he should not be prohibited from future pro se 
2 

filings. See State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47, 48 (Fla. 1999). Having 

carefully considered the response and finding it fails to show cause 

why sanctions should not be imposed, we conclude that Appellant 

is abusing the judicial process and should be barred from further 

pro se filings. 

In order to conserve judicial resources, Appellant is prohibited 

from filing with this Court any further pro se filings concerning 

Seminole County Circuit Court Case No. 201-CA-3310. The Clerk 

of this Court is directed not to accept any further pro se filings 

concerning the referenced case. The Clerk will summarily reject 

any future filings regarding the referenced case unless filed by a 

member in good standing of The Florida Bar. See Isley v. State, 

652 So. 2d 409, 411 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (“Enough is enough.”). 

SANCTIONS IMPOSED. 

EDWARDS, C.J., and LAMBERT and SOUD, JJ., concur.
# C_2016118EN.01002701.xml

| 4.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/27

---

Judgment of the General Court of 26 February 2016 — Vidmar and Others v Commission

(Case T-507/14) (1)

1

((Non-contractual liability - Accession of Croatia to the European Union - Repeal before accession of national legislation establishing the profession of bailiff - Loss suffered by persons formerly appointed as bailiffs - Failure by the Commission to adopt measures to ensure fulfilment of accession commitments - Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals - Article 36 of the Act of Accession))

(2016/C 118/29)

Language of the case: Croatian

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Vedran Vidmar (Zagreb, Croatia) and the 21 other applicants whose names appear in the annex to this judgment (represented by: D. Graf, lawyer), and Darko Graf (Zagreb) (represented initially by D Graf and subsequently by L. Duvnjak, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Ječmenica and G. Wils, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for damages seeking compensation for the harm which the applicants claim to have suffered as a result of the wrongful conduct of the Commission while monitoring the fulfilment of accession commitments by the Republic of Croatia.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Vedran Vidmar and Darko Graf and the other applicants whose names appear in the annex to this judgment to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Vedran Vidmar and Darko Graf and the other applicants whose names appear in the annex to this judgment to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 303, 8.9.2014.

1

---
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 31, 2014

No. 04-13-00548-CR

Nicolas C. FLORES,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 8, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 355026

The Honorable Liza Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The State’s brief was originally due to be filed with this court on February 24, 2014. 

This court granted the State’s first motion for an extension of time to file the brief until March 

26, 2014. On March 28, 2014, the State filed its brief and a second motion for an extension of 

time to file its brief.

The State’s motion is GRANTED; its brief is deemed timely filed. See TEX. R. APP. P.

38.6(d).

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 31st day of March, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<PAGE>
                    EXHIBIT 32.1 - CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Evergreen Solar, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard M. Feldt,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Richard M. Feldt

--------------------------------------------
Richard M. Feldt
Chief Executive Officer
April 29, 2005