alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                                    FORM 8-K

                Current Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
                       The Securities Exchange Act of 1934

                         Date of Report: APRIL 24, 2003

                        Commission File Number: 000-18053

                                   LASERSCOPE

             (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

          CALIFORNIA                                    77-0049527
(State or other jurisdiction of             (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)

                               3070 ORCHARD DRIVE
                             SAN JOSE, CA 95134-2011
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

                                 (408) 943-0636
              (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

                                 NOT APPLICABLE
          (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)

ITEM 9. REGULATION FD DISCLOSURE

      (a) On April 24, 2003 Laserscope (the "Company") issued a press release
announcing its financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2003.

ITEM 7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS

      (a) Not applicable.

      (b) Not applicable.

      (c) Exhibits.

99    Press Release dated April 24, 2003 announcing its financial results for
      the quarter March 31, 2003.


<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

                                   LASERSCOPE
                                  (Registrant)

Date:  April 24, 2003                          By: /s/ Dennis LaLumandiere
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Dennis LaLumandiere
                                                   Vice President, Finance,
                                                   Chief Financial Officer and
                                                   Secretary


<PAGE>

                                INDEX TO EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT
NUMBER       DESCRIPTION
-------      -----------

99           PRESS RELEASE DATED APRIL 24, 2003 ANNOUNCING THE COMPANY'S RESULTS
             FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2003.
# C_2015389EN.01004602.xml

| 23.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 389/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 389/46

---

Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2015 — Hüpeden v Council and Commission

(Case T-206/14) (1)

1

((Non-contractual liability - Dumping - Imports of certain prepared or preserved citrus fruits originating in China - Regulation (EC) No 1355/2008 declared invalid by the Court of Justice - Loss allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of the adoption of the regulation - Action for damages - Exhaustion of remedies under domestic law - Admissibility - Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals - Article 2(7)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 (now Article 2(7)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009) - Duty of care - Causal link))

(2015/C 389/50)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Hüpeden & Co. (GmbH & Co.) KG (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by K. Landry, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendants: Council of the European Union (represented by J.-P. Hix, acting as Agent, assisted initially by D. Geradin and N. Tuominen, and subsequently by N. Tuominen, lawyers); and European Commission (represented by T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, acting as Agents)

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

Action for damages seeking compensation for the loss allegedly suffered as a result of the adoption of Council Regulation (EC) No 1355/2008 of 18 December 2008 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain prepared or preserved citrus fruits (namely mandarins, etc.) originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ 2008 L 350, p. 35), declared invalid by the judgment of 22 March 2012 in GLS (C-338/10, ECR, EU:C:2012:158).

GLS

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Hüpeden & Co. (GmbH & Co.) KG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Hüpeden & Co. (GmbH & Co.) KG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 212, 7.7.2014.

1

---
# C_2016098EN.01006002.xml

| 14.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 98/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 98/60

---

Order of the General Court of 14 January 2016 — Premo v OHIM — Prema Semiconductor (PREMO)

(Case T-440/14) (1)

1

(2016/C 098/77)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 315, 15.9.2014.

1

---
# LEVI TY

AERIAL

Levity Aerial | www.levityaerial.com | Boulder, CO 

# Safety Checklist for UAV Operation

**Pre-flight**

• Reviewed area for any FAA restricted fly zones or other areas of concern

• Reviewed safety requirements with sponsor / owner

• Posted “Launch/Landing” zone sign calling for 50’ perimeter

• Walked the hover area or path of flight to check for any areas on concern

**Flight Set-up**

• Advise anyone within “Launch/Landing” area of safety and 50’ requirement

• Unpack and check UAV for any visible signs of damage

• Turn on Remote Controller and observe that both power and Wi-Fi are green

• Ensure launch zone is clear

• Turn on UAV

• Wait for solid GPS lights (Solid Green slow flashing)

• Review Launch Site one last time before lift off

• Engage motors and start straight horizontal lift to desired altitude

**Flight**

• Monitor both GPS Lock (sufficient number of satellites) / battery level every minute

• Watch for any changes to the “Launch/Landing” area of safety and advise as necessary

• Watch for any irregular craft behavior and land immediately if necessary

• Return the craft to the landing area within 20% of battery life

**Post-Flight**

• Announce that the craft is returning for landing

• Visual check that the 50’ rule is observed / hover until 50’ is observed

• Slowly bring the UAV in for a landing

• Turn off Battery on UAV

• Turn off Remote Controller

• Pack UAV in case for storage
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.36

                          SUMMIT MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.

                 THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE 1993 STOCK OPTION PLAN

                                 May 12, 1997

         I, Richard J. Willemin, Secretary of Summit Medical Systems, Inc., a
Minnesota corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify on behalf of the Company
that on May 12, 1997, pursuant to Section 12.1 of the Company's Stock Option
Plan of 1993, as amended (the "Plan"), the Board of Directors approved a third
amendment to the Plan. Accordingly, Section 7.3(a) of the Plan is hereby amended
and restated as follows:

          (a) TERM. The duration of the Option shall be ten (10) years (five (5)
     years in the case of an Incentive Stock Option granted to a Significant
     Shareholder) from the date of grant.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereto signed my name.



                                        /s/ Richard J. Willemin
                                       ---------------------------------
                                       Richard J. Willemin
                                       Secretary
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7686 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7686

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the Research and Development, Competition, and Innovation Act 
  to clarify the definition of foreign country for purposes of malign 
    foreign talent recruitment restriction, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF DEFINITION OF FOREIGN COUNTRY FOR PURPOSES 
              OF MALIGN FOREIGN TALENT RECRUITMENT RESTRICTION.

    Paragraph (4) of section 10638 of title VI of division B of the 
Research and Development, Competition, and Innovation Act is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``of concern'' after ``foreign country'' 
        each place such term appears;
            (2) by striking ``means--'' and all that follows through 
        ``any program, position, or activity'' and inserting ``means 
        any program, position, or activity'';
            (3) by striking subparagraph (B);
            (4) by redesignating clauses (i) through (ix) as 
        subparagraphs (A) through (I), respectively, and moving such 
        subparagraphs, as so redesignated, two ems to the left;
            (5) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), as so 
        redesignated, by striking ``directly provided'' and inserting 
        ``whether directly or indirectly provided''; and
            (6) in subparagraph (I), as so redesignated, by striking 
        ``; and'' and inserting a period.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 9, 2024.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 7686

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend the Research and Development, Competition, and Innovation Act 
  to clarify the definition of foreign country for purposes of malign 
    foreign talent recruitment restriction, and for other purposes.
```
38916.

#### MEADOWS v. CITY OF EAST POINT.

Decided June 27, 1961.

*Miles B. Sams,*for plaintiff in error.

*Paul Webb, Solicitor-General, Eugene L. Tiller, Archer & Patrick, James H. Archer, Jr., Phillips & Johnson, Ezra E. Phillips,*contra.

Frankum, Judge.

A petition for a writ of certioari to review a judgment of the Recorder’s Court of the City of East Point, which did not contain, or have accompanying it, an affidavit that the petition was not filed for the purpose of delay only, was properly dismissed by the superior court. *Code Ann.*§ 19-205. *Velvin v. Austin,*109 Ga. 200 (34 SE 335); *Horton-Hughes Furniture Co. v. Broad St. Hotel Co.,*22 Ga. App. 89 (95 SE 373); *McAllister v. City of East Point,*97 Ga. App. 233 (102 SE2d 503). The judgment dismissing the petition in this case was rendered before the enactment of Ga. L. 1961, pp. 190', 193, which repealed *Code*§ 19-205, and, therefore, this case is controlled by the law as it existed on March 17, 1961, when the petition was dismissed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Townsend, P. J., and Jordan, J., concur.*
#### § 601.22 Products in short supply; initial manufacturing at other than licensed location.

A biologics license issued to a manufacturer and covering all locations of manufacture shall authorize persons other than such manufacturer to conduct at places other than such locations the initial, and partial manufacturing of a product for shipment solely to such manufacturer only to the extent that the names of such persons and places are registered with the Commissioner of Food and Drugs and it is found upon application of such manufacturer, that the product is in short supply due either to the peculiar growth requirements of the organism involved or to the scarcity of the animal required for manufacturing purposes, and such manufacturer has established with respect to such persons and places such procedures, inspections, tests or other arrangements as will ensure full compliance with the applicable regulations of this subchapter related to continued safety, purity, and potency. Such persons and places shall be subject to all regulations of this subchapter except §§ 601.2 to 601.6, 601.9, 601.10, 601.20, 601.21 to 601.33, and 610.60 to 610.65 of this chapter. For persons and places authorized under this section to conduct the initial and partial manufacturing of a product for shipment solely to a manufacturer of a product subject to licensure under § 601.2(c), the following additional regulations shall not be applicable: §§ 600.10(b) and (c), 600.11, 600.12, 600.13, and 610.53 of this chapter. Failure of such manufacturer to maintain such procedures, inspections, tests, or other arrangements, or failure of any person conducting such partial manufacturing to comply with applicable regulations shall constitute a ground for suspension or revocation of the authority conferred pursuant to this section on the same basis as provided in §§ 601.6 to 601.8 with respect to the suspension and the revocation of licenses.

[42 FR 4718, Jan. 25, 1977, as amended at 61 FR 24233, May 14, 1996; 64 FR 56452, Oct. 20, 1999; 80 FR 37974, July 2, 2015]
# C_2014421EN.01006503.xml

| 24.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 421/65 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 421/65

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 7 May 2014 — Deweerdt and Lebrun v Court of Auditors

(Case F-2/14) (1)

1

2014/C 421/99

Language of the case: French

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 61, 1.3.2014, p. 22.

1

---
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Perry Law, President, Secretary and Treasurer
of Smart-Tek Solutions Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Smart-Tek Solutions
      Inc. for the year ended June 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Smart-Tek Solutions Inc.                                                             



Dated: October 15, 2008



/s/ Perry
LawPerry Law President, Secretary and Treasurer (Principal
Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Smart-Tek
Solutions Inc. and will be retained by Smart-Tek Solutions Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Editorial Note on Part 862
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 862 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 862.3550 Lead test system. ( a ) *Identification.* A lead test system is a device intended to measure lead, a heavy metal, in blood and urine. Measurements obtained by this device are used in the diagnosis and treatment of lead poisoning.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II.
§ 582.6804 Sodium potassium tartrate. ( a ) *Product.* Sodium potassium tartrate.
( b ) *Conditions of use.* This substance is generally recognized as safe when used in accordance with good manufacturing or feeding practice.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Robin Raina, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q, as amended, of Ebix, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

 

(a) All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date:  | May 20, 2005            | /s/ Robin Raina |   |
|--------|-------------------------|-----------------|--------|
|   | Robin Raina             |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1


                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-97162 and 333-07946) and F-3 (File No. 333-49050) of
Deswell Industries, Inc. of our report dated June 30, 2001 appearing in the this
Annual Report on Form 20-F of Deswell Industries, Inc. for the year ended March
31, 2001.


/s/ DELOITTE TOUCHE TOHMATSU

DELOITTE TOUCHE TOHMATSU
Hong Kong
July 6, 2001
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6091

TAYLOR WARREN SMITH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MISS TROTTER, Counselor,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior

District Judge. (CA-95-783)

Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 4, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Taylor Warren Smith, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his

42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. The district court assessed a

filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th

Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and dismissed the

case without prejudice when Appellant failed to comply with the fee

order. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation, and find no abuse

of discretion. We therefore deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7667 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7667

 To expand the seniors farmers' market program to include maple syrup.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 13, 2024

 Mr. Langworthy (for himself, Mr. Courtney, Mr. Pappas, Mr. Pocan, Mr. 
    Grothman, Mr. Lawler, Mr. Williams of New York, Ms. Tenney, Ms. 
 Malliotakis, Mr. Tiffany, and Ms. Stefanik) introduced the following 
        bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To expand the seniors farmers' market program to include maple syrup.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Making Agricultural Products Locally 
Essential (MAPLE) Act''.

SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF THE SENIORS FARMERS' MARKET NUTRITION PROGRAM.

    Section 4402(b)(1) of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 
2002 (7 U.S.C. 3007(b)(1)) is amended by striking ``and herbs'' and 
inserting ``herbs, and maple syrup''.
                                 <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 862
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 862 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 862.1380 Hydroxybutyric dehydrogenase test system. ( a ) *Identification.* A hydroxybutyric dehydrogenase test system is a device intended to measure the activity of the enzyme alpha-hydroxybutric dehydrogenase (HBD) in plasma or serum. HBD measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of myocardial infarction, renal damage (such as rejection of transplants), certain hematological diseases (such as acute leukemias and megaloblastic anemias) and, to a lesser degree, liver disease.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9.
[52 FR 16122, May 1, 1987, as amended at 53 FR 21449, June 8, 1988; 66 FR 38787, July 25, 2001]
# United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 18-1138

JOSE ALBERTO MEDINA,

Petitioner,

v.

MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL, *

Respondent.

**ERRATA SHEET**

The opinion of this Court, issued on January 22, 2019, is amended as follows:

On page 5, line 6, delete "motion to"

* Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2), Acting Attorney General Matthew G. Whitaker has been substituted for former Attorney General Jefferson B. Sessions, III as the respondent.