alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 99.3

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

   In connection with the Annual Report of Avery Communications, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2001, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Patrick J. Haynes, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
   15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
   material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
   Company.

/s/ Patrick J. Haynes, III
--------------------------
Patrick J. Haynes, III
Chief Executive Officer
December 16, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1999             JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-05-1998             MAR-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-04-1998             JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                                          95,000                 114,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                               37,362,000              37,447,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,676,000               2,686,000
<INVENTORY>                                 59,514,000              54,305,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           106,231,000             104,224,000
<PP&E>                                      88,807,000              68,810,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,767,000               5,981,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             188,701,000             169,351,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       40,781,000              36,356,000
<BONDS>                                     87,827,000              74,898,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       101,000                 101,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  88,882,000              88,882,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               188,701,000             169,351,000
<SALES>                                     59,515,000              63,299,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            59,515,000              63,299,000
<CGS>                                       50,629,000              56,311,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               50,629,000              56,311,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,284,000               5,391,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         (1,717,000)             (1,378,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,885,000                 219,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,885,000                 219,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0             (1,629,000)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,885,000             (1,410,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.19                  (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.18                  (0.14)
        

</TABLE>
39082.

#### PURDY v. QUINN.

Decided September 15, 1961.

*386*C. B. Rogers, Edward E. Dorsey, Powell, Goldstein, Fraser & Murphy,*for plaintiff in error.

*Bassett ■& Cochran, Al Cochran, J. M. Grubbs, Jr., Grubbs & Prosser,*contra.

Hall, Judge.

The defendant contends that the sentence from the charge first above quoted amounted to the court’s expression to the jury of the court’s opinion that two or more of the witnesses who testified in the case were witnesses by profession; and that such language by the court was harmful to the defendant because it was reasonably understood by the jury as disparaging and reflecting on the credibility of defendant’s witness, Dr. David Henry Poer, who testified unfavorably to plaintiff as to the injuries she allegedly received in the collision.

While we are in accord with the principle, for which the defendant cites authorities, that it is error for the court to express an opinion upon the evidence presented at the trial, we do not agree with defendant’s contention that the charge objected to can be construed as an expression of opinion by the court. Men of ordinary capacity and understanding, we believe, would understand from the court’s language in context that “professional witnesses” and “expert witnesses” were synonymous. The terms were connected by “or” which is “used to clarify what has already been said, and in such cases, means ‘in other words,’ ‘to-wit,’ or rthat is to say.’ ” Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Ed., 1951, p. 1246.

“The word ‘professional’ is used in many different senses, and in one sense is defined as meaning that which pertains to a profession, and in this sense the word implies knowledge of an advanced type in a given field of science or learning, gained by a prolonged course of specialized instruction or study, and can *387only relate to some of those occupations universally classed as professions, . . .” 72 C.J.S. 1220'.

The defendant qualified its witness Dr. Poer as a medical expert. He was “professional” in the sense of the above definition of the word. The court’s language would convey this méaning to jurors of ordinary capacity.

“It is not necessary in considering a charge to' assume a possible adverse construction, but a charge that is sufficiently clear to be understood by jurors of ordinary capacity and understanding is all that is required.” *Roberts v. McClellan,*80 Ga. App. 190 (3) (55 SE2d 736); *Georgia Railroad v. Thomas,*73 Ga. 350, 356.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Felton, C. J., and Bell, J., concur.*
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

SUE WAGNER, AN INDIVIDUAL, 

Appellant, 

vs. 

BARBARA K. CEGAVSKE, IN HER 

OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS NEVADA 

SECRETARY; AND PROTECT OUR 

GIRLS, A POLITICAL ACTION 

COMMITTEE, 

Respondents. 

No. 85038 

FILE 

OCT 25 2022 

H A. EMOWN 

EME COURT 

EPUTY CLERK 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL AND VACATING ORAL ARGUMENT 

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and cause appearing, 

this appeal is dismissed. The parties shall bear their own costs and attorney 

fees. NRAP 42(b). Further, the oral argument in this matter currently 

scheduled for November 7, 2022, at 1:30 p.m. is vacated. 

1:2141)L

Parraguirre 

cc: Wolf, Rifkin, Shapiro, Schulman & Rabkin, LLP/Las Vegas 

Wolf, Rifkin, Shapiro, Schulman & Rabkin, LLP/Reno 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Attorney General/Las Vegas 

Hutchison & Steffen, LLC/Reno 

, C.J. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA
Exhibit 32.1

AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTIONS 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ebix, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Robin Raina, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Robin Raina        
|    |  | Name: Robin Raina      
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer

January 9, 2012
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

EDDIE QUICK,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 260 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 15th day of October, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 159 (Wednesday, August 17, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 51119]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20948]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

Application of California-Palomar Airlines, Inc.; D/B/A 
California Pacific Airlines for Certificate Authority

AGENCY: Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Notice of Order to Show Cause (Order 2011-8-15); Docket DOT-
OST-2010-0126.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Transportation is directing all interested 
persons to show cause why it should not issue an order finding 
California-Palomar Airlines, Inc. d/b/a California Pacific Airlines 
fit, willing, and able, and awarding to it a certificate of public 
convenience and necessity to engage in interstate scheduled air 
transportation of persons, property, and mail.

DATES: Persons wishing to file objections should do so no later than 
August 24, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Objections and answers to objections should be filed in 
Docket DOT-OST-2010-0126 and addressed to U.S. Department of 
Transportation, Docket Operations, (M-30, Room W12-140), 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590, 
and should be served upon the parties listed in Attachment A to the 
order.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Damon D. Walker, Air Carrier Fitness 
Division (X-56, Room W86-465), U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366-7785.

Robert A. Letteney,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2011-20948 Filed 8-16-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
Exhibit 23

 

**Consentof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in Registration Statement Form S-8 (No. 333-130041)of Retractable Technologies, Inc. of our report dated March 31, 2008relating to our audit of the financial statements and financial statementschedule, which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of RetractableTechnologies, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007.

 
|           |   |   | /s/ CF & Co.,  L.L.P. |   |   |
|----------------|--------|--------|--------------------------------|--------|--------|
|           |   |   | CF & Co.,  L.L.P.     |   |   |
|           |   |   |                           |   |
| Dallas, Texas  |   |   |                           |   |
| March 31, 2008 |   |   |                           |   |

 

 

----
Exhibit 10.1


 


AMENDMENT TO "APPENDIX A" OF THE


ASTEC INDUSTRIES, INC.


SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN












THIS AMENDMENT to "Appendix A" of the Astec Industries, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended and restated as of January 1, 2008 (the "Plan"), is adopted by Astec Industries, Inc. (the "Company"), effective as of April 27, 2017.







WHEREAS, Article 2 of the Plan permits the Board of Directors of the Company (the "Board") to designate participants in the Plan from time to time, whose names and effective dates of participation shall be set forth on Exhibit A to the Plan;







NOW, THEREFORE, the Company hereby amends "Appendix A" of the Plan in the form attached hereto, to update the same for changes in Plan participation approved by the Board, by action taken on April 27, 2017.







Except as amended herein, the Plan shall continue in full force and effect.







ASTEC INDUSTRIES, INC.







Date: April 27, 2017


                    By: /s/ Stephen C. Anderson


Name: Stephen C. Anderson


Title: Corporate Secretary





















	
"APPENDIX A"


	
Each Participant's Date of Participation


	  
	
Name of Participant

	 	
Effective Dates of Participation


	
W. Norman Smith

	 	
January 1, 1995


	
Richard Patek

	 	
January 1, 1995


	
Tim Gonigam

	 	
August 1, 2000


	
Jeff Elliott

	 	
January 1, 2002


	
Stephen C. Anderson

	 	
January 1, 2003


	
Richard Dorris

	 	
January 3, 2005


	
David C. Silvious

	 	
July 1, 2005


	
Ben Brock

	 	
January 1, 2007


	
Michael A. Bremmer

	 	
January 1, 2007


	
Lawrence R. Cumming

	 	
January 1, 2008


	
Neil Peterson

	 	
January 1, 2008


	
Joe Cline

	 	
February 1, 2008


	
Chris Colwell

	 	
May 31, 2011


	
Robin Leffew

	 	
August 1, 2011


	
Matthew B. Haven

	 	
January 1, 2013


	
Jeff May

	 	
October 1, 2013


	
Malcolm Swanson

	 	
January 1, 2014


	
Tom Wilkey

	 	
January 1, 2014


	
Jeff Schwarz

	 	
July 1, 2014


	
Steven L. Claude

	 	
August 24, 2015


	
John Irvine

	 	
April 28, 2016


	
Jaco Van Der Merwe

	 	
October 1, 2016


	
Scott Barker

	 	
April 3, 2017
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 12, 2022

No. 04-22-00529-CR

Jenelius O. CREW,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR12785

Honorable Stephanie R. Boyd, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

In accordance with a plea bargain, Jeneluis O. Crew pled nolo contendere to deadly 

conduct in exchange for deferred adjudication community supervision. The trial court 

subsequently adjudicated Crew guilty and sentenced him. Crew now seeks to appeal. However, 

the clerk’s record contains a trial court certification signed on July 15, 2022 stating, “this 

criminal case is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” Because this is 

an appeal from a proceeding on the motion to adjudicate guilt, the trial court’s certification of 

defendant’s right of appeal is defective. Hargesheimer v. State, 182 S.W.3d 906, 913 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 2006). We therefore ORDER the trial court to amend the certification and the district clerk 

to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing the amended certification by October 12, 2022. 

TEX. R. APP. P. 37.2; Hargesheimer, 182 S.W.3d at 913.

_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 12th day of September, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
Editorial Note on Part 862
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 862 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 862.1187 Conjugated sulfolithocholic acid (SLCG) test system. ( a ) *Identification.* A conjugated sulfolithocholic acid (SLCG) test system is a device intended to measure the bile acid SLCG in serum. Measurements obtained by this device are used in the diagnosis and treatment of liver disorders, such as cirrhosis or obstructive liver disease.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > The National-Bank Act as Amended, and Other Laws Relating to National Banks

              														The National-Bank Act as Amended, and Other Laws Relating to National Banks, October 1, 1913.						https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/433,			accessed on September 6, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
Editorial Note on Part 862
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 862 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 862.2150 Continuous flow sequential multiple chemistry analyzer for clinical use. ( a ) *Identification.* A continuous flow sequential multiple chemistry analyzer for clinical use is a modular analytical instrument intended to simultaneously perform multiple chemical procedures using the principles of automated continuous flow systems. This device is intended for use in conjunction with certain materials to measure a variety of analytes.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 862.9.
[52 FR 16122, May 1, 1987, as amended at 65 FR 2308, Jan. 14, 2000]
EPRI Species List with Life History Information for Equivalent Adult and Production Foregone Analysis

Marine species

1. American shad

2. Blueback herring

3. Bay Anchovy

4. Atlantic menhaden

5. Gulf menhaden

6. Atlantic silverside

7. Striped bass

8. White perch

9. Atlantic croaker

10. Spot

11. Weakfish

12. Red drum

13. Winter flounder

14. White croaker

15. Blue crab

16. White, pink, and brown shrimp

17. Pacific sardine

18. Cunner

19. Tautog

20. Naked goby

21. Hogchoker

22. Three-spine stickleback

23. Alewife

24. Cutlassfish

25. Mojarra

26. Silver perch

27. Silver hake

Top entrained marine species per EPRI I&E 

Survey (not ranked; excludes Hawaii and Puerto 

Rico)

1. Gobies

2. Northern anchovy

3. Cunner

4. Bay anchovy

5. Atlantic menhaden

6. Tautog

7. White perch

8. White, brown and pink shrimp

Top impinged marine species per EPRI I&E 

Survey (not ranked; excludes Hawaii and Puerto 

Rico)

1. Queenfish

2. Northern anchovy

3. Red rock shrimp

4. Round stingray

5. Topsmelt

6. Atlantic menhaden

7. Atlantic silverside

8. Winter flounder

9. Blue crab

10. Atlantic croaker

11. White, brown and pink shrimp

12. Hogchoker
Freshwater species

1. Great Lakes alewife

2. Channel catfish

3. Freshwater drum

4. White bass

5. Gizzard shad

6. Threadfin shad

7. Emerald shiner

8. Rainbow smelt

9. Yellow perch

10. Black crappie

11. Round goby

12. Smallmouth bass

13. Bluegill

14. Shovelnose sturgeon

15. Bigmouth buffalo

16. Shorthead redhorse

17. Brown bullhead

18. Slimy sculpin

19. Burbot

20. Lake whitefish

21. logperch

22. Walleye

23. Great Lakes white perch

Top entrained freshwater species per EPRI I&E 

Survey (not ranked):

1. Alewife

2. Gizzard shad

3. Cyprinids

4. Round goby

5. Yellow perch

6. Brook silverside

7. Catostomids (suckers)

8. Lepomis species (bluegill)

Top impinged freshwater species per EPRI I&E 

Survey (not ranked):

1. Gizzard shad

2. Threadfin shad

3. Alewife

4. Bluegill

5. Channel catfish

6. Emerald shiner

7. Yellow perch

8. Threespine stickleback

9. White crappie

10. Largemouth bass

11. Freshwater drum

12. Inland silverside
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

LARRY KLAYMAN, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

HONORABLE COLLEEN 

KOLLAR-KOTELL Y, et al. 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) Civil Case No. 11-1775 (RJL) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT 

For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered this date, it is this 

41--- 2 .S. day of September, 2012, hereby 

ORDERED that the defendants' Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. #11] is GRANTED; it 

is further 

ORDERED that plaintiffs Motion to Change Venue [Dkt. #6] is DENIED AS 

MOOT; and it is further 

ORDERED that final judgment be entered in this case for the defendants. 

SO ORDERED. 

United States District Judge 

1
APPENDIX O 

 
Flight Checklist

LED

Motors inactive, safe to 

handle

Low battery, automatic landing

Loss of RC signal, automatic landing

Pre-arm safety check failure

Loss of GPS signal, switch to manual

Initializing, hold the X8 level

Acquiring GPS, please wait

Autopilot ready, GPS locked

Armed

Safety Button

Motors active, deactivate before 

handling (see reverse)

Flight Modes

Return to launch

RTL

land at the launch point

Stabalize

Altitude Hold

Loiter

Full Autonomy

Standard position 

(altitude hold mode)

STD

fly manually

Loiter mode

LTR

hover

Stabalize

Altitude Hold

Loiter

Full Autonomy

Return to Launch

!

Stand back!

4 6

The motors are 

now active.

Hold left stick downright until motors spin.

1 2 Power on controller;

set to STD and RTL OFF.

Arm 

motors.

Press and hold safety 

button until solid red.

Connect

charged battery.

Choose a clear launch 

point, and face the X8 

away from you. 

5 Check 3 LED.

Place the X8 at 

launch point.

Go outside to 

an open area!

See the Operation 

Manual for complete 

instructions.

Auto mode

AUTO

fly a mission

©2014 3D Robotics. vB. DCT0005 All rights reserved.

Control gimbal

TILT

tilt the camera down and up

Land

CH7

land at the current position

Stabalize

Altitude Hold

Loiter

Full Autonomy

Stabalize

Altitude Hold

Loiter

Full Autonomy

X8+

Hold the X8 still 

and level while 

powering on.
Press and hold until 

blinking red to deactivate.

Hold left stick downleft until motors stop. 

1 2 Disarm 

motors.

Press safety 

button. 3 Disconnect battery. 4Power off 

controller. Postflight

Controller Flight Data

Press and hold the DN button to access the flight data screens. 

Press DN again to toggle between screens.

Lower left stick below 

center to descend.

Set left stick fully down to 

land when near the ground.

Left Stick

Left Stick

Raise left stick above 

center to take off and 

gain altitude.

Move left stick left 

and right to rotate.

Use right stick to fly forward, 

backward, left, and right.

Set left stick to center 

to maintain altitude.

Left Stick

Left Stick

Flight

current flight mode

controller battery level (9-12 V)

GPS signal strength in # of 

satellites

meters from launch point

flight battery level (14-16.8 V)

connection strength

current latitude

current longitude

altitude in meters

flight time

altitude in meters

For customer support, contact us at help@3dr.com

or call our support line at +1 (858) 225-1414 

Monday through Friday, from 8 am to 5 pm, PST.

3DR.com/X8/info 

GPS status

speed in m/s

flight battery mAh 

consumed since armed

End your flight at 14.1 V.

Do not exceed 8,000 mAh for 

a fully charged X8+ battery 

(80% of available capacity).

!