UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,  D.C.  20549

FORM 20-F

(Mark One)



REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

or

X

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended

January 31, 2006

or



TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ___________________ to ______________________

Commission file number:

0-26296

Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Not applicable

(Translation of Registrant's name into English)

Province of British Columbia, Canada

(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

Suite 1820, 701 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V7Y 1K8

(Address of principal executive offices)



Page 1 of 126 Pages





---

- 2 -



Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act.

|Title of each class | Name of each exchange on which registered
|------------------- | -----------------------------------------
|None                | Not applicable                           

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act.

Common Shares Without Par Value
_____________________________________________________________________________________
(Title of Class)

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act.

None
_____________________________________________________________________________________
(Title of Class)

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer's classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report.

70,246,303
_____________________________________________________________________________________

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes X  No _________

Indicate by check mark which financial statement item the Registrant has elected to follow.

Item 17 X  Item 18 _____

(APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PAST FIVE YEARS)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.

Yes ____  No ____  Not Applicable  X

The information set forth in this Annual Report on Form 20-F is as at January 31, 2006, unless an earlier or later date is indicated.



---

- 3 -



Financial information is presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in Canada.  Measurement differences between accounting principles generally accepted in Canada and in the United States, as applicable to Petaquilla Minerals Ltd., are set forth in Item 5 of this Annual Report and in Note 19 to the accompanying Financial Statements of Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.

Statements in this Annual Report regarding expected completion dates of feasibility studies, anticipated commencement dates of mining or metal production operations, projected quantities of future metal production and anticipated production rates, operating efficiencies, costs and expenditures are forward-looking statements.  Actual results could differ materially depending upon the availability of materials, equipment, required permits or approvals and financing, the occurrence of unusual weather or operating conditions, the accuracy of reserve estimates, lower than expected ore grades or the failure of equipment or processes to operate in accordance with specifications.  See "Risk Factors" for other factors that may affect our future financial performance.



---

- 4 -



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

FORM 20-F

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page No.

|       | GLOSSARY OF MINING TERMS                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         | 8 
|------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | --
|       |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |   
|PART I |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  | 10
|       |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |   
|ITEM 1 | IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISORS                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            | 10
|       |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |   
|ITEM 2 | OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          | 10
|       |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |   
|ITEM 3 | KEY INFORMATION                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  | 10
|A.     | Selected Financial Data                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          | 10
|B.     | Capitalization and Indebtedness                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  | 12
|C.     | Reasons For The Offer and Use of Proceeds                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        | 12
|D.     | Risk Factors                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     | 12
|       | Exploration and Development Risks                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                | 12
|       | Estimates of Reserves, Mineral Deposits and Production Costs                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     | 13
|       | Risks of Development, Construction and Mining Operations                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         | 13
|       | Expanded Panama Canal Watershed Could Affect Development                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         | 14
|       | Title Matters                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    | 14
|       | Conflicts of Interest                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            | 14
|       | Currency Fluctuations                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            | 14
|       | Additional Funding Requirements                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  | 14
|       | Requirements of Ley Petaquilla                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   | 15
|       | History of Net Losses; Accumulated Deficit; Lack of Revenue From Operations                                                                                                                                                                                                                      | 17
|       | Limited Experience with Development-Stage Mining Operations                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      | 18
|       | Stock Subject to Penny Stock Rules                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               | 18
|       | Competition                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      | 18
|       | Mineral Prices                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   | 18
|       | Foreign Countries and Regulatory Requirements                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    | 19
|       | Environmental and Other Regulatory Requirements                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  | 19
|       | Panama Political Risks                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           | 20
|       | Dividends                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        | 20
|       | Our Officers and Directors Resident Outside U.S;. Potential Unenforceability of Civil Liabilities and Judgments                                                                                                                                                                                  | 20
|       | If We are Unable to Successfully Develop and Subsequently Generate Sufficient Cash Flow from Our Properties, We Could be Treated as a Passive Foreign Investment Company for U.S. Tax Purposes, Possibly Resulting in Additional Taxes to Our U.S. Stockholders and Less Liquidity for the Stock | 20
|       |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |   



---

- 5 -





|ITEM 4 | INFORMATION ON OUR COMPANY                                                              | 21
|------ | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --
|A.     | History and Development of Our Company                                                  | 21
|       | Acquisition of the Petaquilla Property, Panama                                          | 21
|       | Financing Agreement with Teck Corporation                                               | 21
|       | Molejon Property - Panama                                                               | 23
|       | Mineral Properties - Other                                                              | 23
|       | Directors and Officers of Our Company                                                   | 23
|       | Principal Capital Expenditures/Divestitures Over Last Three Fiscal Years                | 24
|       | Current and Planned Capital Expenditures/Divestitures                                   | 24
|       | Public Takeover Offers                                                                  | 24
|B.     | Business Overview                                                                       | 24
|C.     | Organizational Structure                                                                | 25
|D.     | Property, Plant and Equipment                                                           | 27
|       | Petaquilla Property, Panama                                                             | 27
|       | Introduction                                                                            | 27
|       | Calendar 2006 Ley Petaquilla Concession Copper Deposit Plans                            | 28
|       | Location, Access & Physiography                                                         | 29
|       | Plant and Equipment                                                                     | 30
|       | Title                                                                                   | 30
|       | Exploration History                                                                     | 32
|       | Exploration - Results Obtained By Us or on Our Behalf                                   | 32
|       | Regional and Local Geology                                                              | 41
|       | Mineralization                                                                          | 42
|       | Preliminary Feasibility Study                                                           | 43
|       | Production Scoping Study                                                                | 46
|       | Final Feasibility Study                                                                 | 47
|       | Status of Project Financing                                                             | 48
|       | Doing Business in Panama                                                                | 48
|       |                                                                                         |   
|ITEM 5 | OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS                                            | 50
|A.     | Operating Results                                                                       | 50
|       | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2006, Compared to Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2005      | 51
|       | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2005, Compared to Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2004      | 51
|       | Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2004, Compared to Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2003      | 52
|B.     | Liquidity and Capital Resources                                                         | 52
|       | January 31, 2006, Compared to January 31, 2005                                          | 53
|       | January 31, 2005, Compared to January 31, 2004                                          | 54
|       | January 31, 2004, Compared to January 31, 2003                                          | 54
|       | Material Differences between Canadian and U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles | 55
|       | Outlook                                                                                 | 55
|C.     | Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, etc.                                    | 55
|D.     | Trend Information                                                                       | 56
|E.     | Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements                                                          | 56
|F.     | Disclosure of Contractual Obligations                                                   | 56
|       |                                                                                         | 56



---

- 6 -





|ITEM 6  | DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES                                        | 56
|------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --
|A.      | Directors and Senior Management                                                   | 56
|B.      | Compensation                                                                      | 57
|        | Cash and Non-Cash Compensation - Executive Officers and Directors                 | 57
|        | Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year                                                 | 58
|        | Aggregated Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and Fiscal Year-End Option Values | 59
|        | Defined Benefit or Actuarial Plan Disclosure                                      | 59
|        | Termination of Employment, Change in Responsibilities and Employment Contracts    | 59
|        | Directors                                                                         | 60
|C.      | Board Practices                                                                   | 61
|D.      | Employees                                                                         | 62
|        | Consultants                                                                       | 62
|E.      | Share Ownership                                                                   | 63
|        |                                                                                   |   
|ITEM 7  | MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS                                 | 64
|A.      | Major Shareholders                                                                | 64
|B.      | Related Party Transactions                                                        | 65
|C.      | Interests of Experts and Counsel                                                  | 66
|        |                                                                                   |   
|ITEM 8  | FINANCIAL INFORMATION                                                             | 66
|A.      | Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information                           | 66
|B.      | Significant Changes                                                               | 66
|        |                                                                                   |   
|ITEM 9  | THE OFFER AND LISTING                                                             | 66
|A.      | Offer and Listing Details                                                         | 66
|B.      | Plan of Distribution                                                              | 68
|C.      | Markets                                                                           | 68
|D.      | Selling Shareholders                                                              | 68
|E.      | Dilution                                                                          | 68
|F.      | Expenses of the Issue                                                             | 68
|        |                                                                                   |   
|ITEM 10 | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION                                                            | 68
|A.      | Share Capital                                                                     | 68
|B.      | Memorandum and Articles of Association                                            | 69
|C.      | Material Contracts                                                                | 71
|D.      | Exchange Controls                                                                 | 71
|E.      | Taxation                                                                          | 73
|        | Material Canadian Federal Income Tax Consequences                                 | 73
|        | Dividends                                                                         | 73
|        | Capital Gains                                                                     | 73
|        | Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences                            | 74
|        | U.S. Holders                                                                      | 75
|        | Distributions on Common Shares of the Company                                     | 75
|        | Foreign Tax Credit                                                                | 76
|        | Information Reporting and Backup Withholding                                      | 76
|        | Disposition of Common Shares of the Company                                       | 76
|        | Currency Exchange Gains or Losses                                                 | 77



---

- 7 -





|         | Other Considerations                                                         | 77
|-------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --
|         | Foreign Personal Holding Company                                             | 77
|         | Foreign Investment Company                                                   | 77
|         | Passive Foreign Investment Company                                           | 78
|         | Controlled Foreign Corporation                                               | 79
|F.       | Dividends and Paying Agents                                                  | 79
|G.       | Statement by Experts                                                         | 79
|H.       | Documents on Display                                                         | 79
|I.       | Subsidiary Information                                                       | 80
|         |                                                                              |   
|ITEM 11  | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK                   | 80
|         |                                                                              |   
|ITEM 12  | DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES                       | 80
|         |                                                                              |   
|PART II  |                                                                              | 80
|         |                                                                              |   
|ITEM 13  | DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARS AND DELINQUENCIES                                 | 80
|         |                                                                              |   
|ITEM 14  | MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS | 80
|         |                                                                              |   
|ITEM 15  | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES                                                      | 81
|         |                                                                              |   
|ITEM 16  | RESERVED                                                                     | 81
|A.       | Audit Committee Financial Expert                                             | 81
|B.       | Code of Ethics                                                               | 81
|C.       | Principal Accountant Fees and Services                                       | 82
|D.       | Exemptions From the Listing Standards for Audit Committees                   | 83
|E.       | Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers       | 83
|         |                                                                              |   
|PART III |                                                                              | 83
|         |                                                                              |   
|ITEM 17  | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS                                                         | 83
|         |                                                                              |   
|ITEM 18  | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS                                                         | 83
|         |                                                                              |   
|ITEM 19  | EXHIBITS                                                                     | 86
|         |                                                                              |   
|         | SIGNATURES                                                                   | 86





---

- 8 -



GLOSSARY OF MINING TERMS

The following is a glossary of some of the terms used in the mining industry and referenced herein:

Commission - United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

copper equivalent - a method of presenting combined copper and gold concentrations or weights for comparison purposes.  Commonly involves expressing gold as its proportionate value in copper based on the relative value of the two metals.  When copper equivalent is used to express metal sold, the calculation is based on actual prices received.  When grades are expressed in copper equivalent, the relative recoveries of the two metals are also taken into account.

cutoff grade - deemed grade of mineralization, established by reference to economic factors, above which material is included in mineral deposit calculations and below which material is considered waste.  May be either an external cutoff grade, which refers to the grade of mineralization used to control the external or design limits of an open pit based upon the expected economic parameters of the operation, or an internal cutoff grade, which refers to the minimum grade required for blocks of mineralization present within the confines of an open pit to be included in mineral deposit estimates.

diamond drill - a machine designed to rotate under pressure an annular diamond-studded cutting tool to produce a more or less continuous solid sample (drill core) of the material that is drilled.

epithermal - a term applied to those mineral deposits formed in and along fissures or other openings in rocks by deposition at shallow depths from ascending hot solutions.

indicated reserves or probable reserves - reserves for which quantity and grade and/or quality are computed from information similar to that used for measured or proven reserves, but the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are farther apart or are otherwise less adequately spaced.  The degree of assurance, although lower than that for measured reserves, is high enough to assume continuity between points of observation.

junior resource company - as used herein means a company whose mineral resource properties are in the exploration phase only and which is wholly or substantially dependent on equity financing or joint ventures to fund its ongoing activities.

measured reserves or proven reserves - reserves for which (a) quantity is computed from dimensions revealed in outcrops, trenches, workings or drill holes; grade and/or quality are computed from the results of detailed sampling; and (b) the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are spaced so closely and the geological character is so well defined that size, shape, depth and mineral content of reserves are well established.

mineral deposit,deposit or mineralized material - a mineralized body which has been physically delineated by sufficient drilling, trenching and/or underground work, and found to contain a sufficient average grade of metal or metals to warrant further exploration and/or development expenditures.  Such a deposit does not qualify under Commission standards as a commercially mineable ore body or as containing ore reserves, until final legal, technical and economic factors have been resolved.

molybdenite - the mineral MoS2, or molybdenum sulphide, which is the principal ore of molybdenum.

open pit mining - the process of mining an ore body from the surface in progressively deeper steps.  Sufficient waste rock adjacent to the ore body is removed to maintain mining access and to maintain the stability of the resulting pit.



---

- 9 -



ore - a natural aggregate of one or more minerals which, at a specified time and place, may be mined and sold at a profit, or from which some part may be profitably separated.

ounces - troy ounces.

oz/tonne - troy ounces per metric ton.

ppb - parts per billion.

ppm - parts per million.

porphyry deposit - a disseminated mineral deposit often closely associated with porphyritic intrusive rocks.

recoverable ounces and recoverable pounds - means the amount of metal produced from diluted mineable reserves after taking into account milling losses and based, in the case of the Petaquilla Property, on projected average recoveries of (i) 90% for copper, 65% for gold and 72% for molybdenite, in the case of production estimates by Kilborn Engineering (Pacific) Ltd. and (ii) 90% for copper, 60% for gold from the Molejon deposit, 65% for gold from the other deposits and 65% for molybdenite, in the case of production estimates by Fluor Daniel Wright Ltd. and (iii) 90% for copper, 58% for gold and 62% for molybdenite, in the case of production estimates by H.A. Simons Ltd.

reserve - that part of a mineral deposit which can be economically and legally extracted or produced at the time of the reserve determination.  Reserves are customarily stated in terms of "ore" when dealing with metalliferous minerals.

stockwork - a rock mass so interpenetrated by small veins of ore that the whole must be mined together.  Stockworks are distinguished from tabular or sheet deposits, i.e. veins or beds, which have a small thickness in comparison with their extension in the main plane of the deposit.

strike length - the longest horizontal dimensions of a body or zone of mineralization.

stripping ratio - the ratio of waste material to ore that is experienced in mining an ore body.

tonne - metric ton (2,204 pounds).



---

- 10 -



PART I

This annual report contains forward-looking statements as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements relate to future events or our future financial performance. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as "may", "will", "should", "expects", "plans", "anticipates", "believes", "estimates", "predicts", "potential" or "continue" or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, including the risks in the section entitled "Risk Factors", that may cause our or our industry's actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Except as required by applicable law, including the securities laws of the United States, we do not intend to update any of the forward-looking statements to conform these statements to actual results.

As used in this annual report, the terms "we", "us", "our", and "PTQ" mean Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. and its subsidiaries, unless otherwise indicated.

Unless otherwise indicated, all dollar amounts referred to herein are in Canadian dollars.

ITEM 1.  IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISORS

This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the Exchange Act and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item.

ITEM 2.  OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE

This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the Exchange Act and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item.

ITEM 3.  KEY INFORMATION

A.  Selected Financial Data

The following tables summarize our selected financial data (stated in Canadian dollars) prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles ("Canadian GAAP").  The information in the tables was extracted from the more detailed financial statements and related notes included with this filing and should be read in conjunction with these financial statements and with the information appearing under the heading "Item 5  Operating and Financial Review and Prospects".  Note 19 of our financial statements included with this filing sets forth the measurement differences were such information to be presented in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles ("U.S. GAAP").  Results for the periods ended January 31, 2006, are not necessarily indicative of results for future periods.



---

- 11 -



INFORMATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH CANADIAN GAAP:

|    | Year Ended January 31                        
|--- | ---------------------------------------------
|    |                                              
|(a) | Total revenue                                
|(b) | Earnings (loss) before extraordinary items(1)
|    |                                              
|    |                                              
|(c) | Total assets                                 
|(d) | Total long-term debt                         
|(e) | Total shareholder equity (deficiency)        
|(f) | Cash dividends declared per share            
|(g) | Net earnings (loss) for the period           
|    |                                              
|    |                                              

(1)  The effect of potential share issuances pursuant to the exercise of options and warrants would be anti-dilutive and, therefore, basic and diluted losses per share are the same.

INFORMATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH U.S. GAAP:

|    | Year Ended January 31                     
|--- | ------------------------------------------
|    |                                           
|(a) | Total revenue                             
|(b) | Earnings (loss) before extraordinary items
|    |                                           
|    |                                           
|(c) | Total assets                              
|(d) | Total long-term debt                      
|(e) | Total shareholder equity (deficiency)     
|(e) | Cash dividends declared per share         
|(f) | Net earnings (loss) for the period        
|    |                                           
|    |                                           

(1)  The effect of potential share issuances pursuant to the exercise of options and warrants would be anti-dilutive and, therefore, basic and diluted losses are the same.

We have not declared or paid any dividends in any of our last five financial years.

On January 31, 2006, the exchange rate, based on the noon buying rate published by The Bank of Canada, for the conversion of Canadian dollars into United States dollars (the "Noon Rate of Exchange") was $1.1439.



---

- 12 -



The following table sets out the high and low exchange rates for each of the last six months.

|                | 2006   | 2005  
|--------------- | ------ | ------
|                | April  | March 
|High for period | 1.1719 | 1.1724
|Low for period  | 1.1203 | 1.1322

The following table sets out the average exchange rates for the five most recent financial years calculated by using the average of the Noon Rate of Exchange on the last day of each month during the period.

|Year Ended January 31 
|----------------------
|                      
|Average for the period

B.  Capitalization and Indebtedness

This Form 20F is being filed as an annual report under the Exchange Act and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item.

C.  Reasons For The Offer and Use of Proceeds

This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the Exchange Act and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item.

D.  Risk Factors

The following is a brief discussion of those distinctive or special characteristics of our operations and industry which may have a material impact on, or constitute risk factors in respect of, our future financial performance.

Exploration and Development Risks

We are engaged in the acquisition, exploration, exploration management, development and sale of mineral properties, with the primary aim of developing them to a stage where they can be exploited at a profit.  Our property interests are in the exploration stage only, with the exception of the Petaquilla Property, and are without a known body of commercial ore.  Accordingly, there is little likelihood that we will realize any profits in the short to medium term.  Any profitability in the future from our business will be dependent upon locating mineral reserves, which itself is subject to numerous risk factors.

The business of exploring for minerals and mining involves a high degree of risk.  Few properties that are explored are ultimately developed into producing mines.  In developing our mineral deposits, we will be subjected to an array of complex economic factors and accordingly there is no assurance that a positive feasibility study or any projected results contained in a feasibility study of a mineral deposit will be attained.

Technical considerations, delays in obtaining governmental approvals, inability to obtain financing or other factors could cause delays in developing properties.  Such delays could materially adversely affect our financial performance.



---

- 13 -



The business of mining is subject to a variety of risks such as cave-ins and other accidents, flooding, environmental hazards, the discharge of toxic chemicals, and other hazards.  Such occurrences may delay production, increase production costs or result in liability.  We will obtain insurance in amounts that we consider to be adequate to protect ourselves against certain risks of mining and processing.  However, we may become subject to liability for hazards against which we cannot insure ourselves or which we may elect not to insure against because of premium costs or other reasons.  In particular, we are not insured for environmental liability or earthquake damage.

In order to develop the Petaquilla Property, located in Panama, it will be necessary to build the necessary infrastructure facilities, including electricity, transportation, etc., the costs of which could be substantial.  During the fiscal year ended January 31, 2002, we recorded a write-down of $32,628,433 in respect of our Petaquilla Property as a result of depressed copper prices making development of the Petaquilla Property uneconomical at that time.  Recent significant increases in metal commodity prices may not be sustainable.  They may not be reliable as indicators of future consistent realizable values, should any of PTQs mineral deposits reach commercial production.

Estimates of Reserves, Mineral Deposits and Production Costs

Although the ore reserve and mineral deposit figures included herein, most of which, as noted, are not compliant with National Instrument Policy 43-101, have been carefully prepared by us, or, in some instances have been prepared, reviewed or verified by independent mining experts, these amounts are estimates only and no assurance can be given that any particular level of recovery of minerals from ore reserves will in fact be realized or that an identified mineral deposit will ever qualify as a commercially mineable (or viable) ore body which can be legally and economically exploited.  Further development, drilling and other engineering analysis is required in order to have any of PTQs reserves classified as proven resources.  Estimates of reserves, mineral deposits and production costs can also be affected by such factors as permitting regulations and requirements, weather, environmental factors, unforeseen technical difficulties, unusual or unexpected geological formations and work interruptions.  In addition, the grade of ore ultimately mined may differ from that indicated by drilling results.  Short term factors relating to ore reserves, such as the need for orderly development of ore bodies or the processing of new or different grades, may also have an adverse effect on mining operations and on the results of operations.  There can be no assurance that minerals recovered in small scale laboratory tests will be duplicated in large scale tests under on-site conditions.  Material changes in ore reserves, grades, stripping ratios or recovery rates may affect the economic viability of projects.  Ore reserves are reported as general indicators of mine life.  Reserves should not be interpreted as assurances of mine life or of the profitability of current or future operations.

Risks of Development, Construction and Mining Operations

Our ability to meet timing and cost estimates for properties cannot be assured.  Technical considerations, delays in obtaining governmental approvals, inability to obtain financing or other factors could cause delays in developing properties.  Such delays could materially adversely affect our financial performance.

The business of mining is subject to a variety of risks such as cave-ins and other accidents, flooding, environmental hazards, the discharge of toxic chemicals and other hazards.  Such occurrences may delay production, increase production costs or result in liability.  We will obtain insurance in amounts that we consider to be adequate to protect ourselves against certain risks of mining and processing.  However, we may become subject to liability for hazards against which we cannot insure ourselves or which we may elect not to insure against because of premium costs or other reasons.  In particular, we are not insured for environmental liability or earthquake damage.

In order to develop the Petaquilla Property, it will be necessary to build the necessary infrastructure facilities, including, electricity, transportation, etc., the costs of which could be substantial.



---

- 14 -



Expanded Panama Canal Watershed Could Affect Development

On August 30, 1999, the Government of Panama passed legislation which significantly expands the size of the Panama Canal Watershed in general and, in particular, establishes an overlap of 2,885 of the 13,600 hectares comprising the Petaquilla concession.  It is possible that the future construction of dams within the watershed area could negatively affect the development of the Petaquilla Property.  In late April 2006, the Government of Panama indicated they will introduce legislation to repeal their earlier law on expanding the size of the Panama Canal Watershed, which includes the aforementioned overlap.  There is no guarantee such repeal legislation will ultimately be passed by the Government of Panama.

Title Matters

While we have diligently investigated title to all mineral exploration concessions and, to the best of our knowledge, title to such properties is in good standing, this should not be construed as a guarantee of title.

Conflicts of Interest

Certain of our directors are directors of other reporting companies or have significant shareholdings in other mineral resource companies and, to the extent that such other companies may participate in ventures in which we may participate, our directors may have a conflict of interest in negotiating and concluding terms respecting the extent of such participation.  In the event that such a conflict of interest arises at a meeting of our directors, a director who has such a conflict will abstain from voting for or against the approval of such a participation or such terms.  In appropriate cases we will establish a special committee of independent directors to review a matter in which several directors, or management, may have a conflict.  In accordance with the laws of the Province of British Columbia, our directors are required to act honestly, in good faith and in the best interests of PTQ.  In determining whether or not we will participate in a particular program and the interest therein to be acquired by it, the directors will primarily consider the potential benefits to PTQ, the degree of risk to which we may be exposed and our financial position at that time.  Other than as indicated, we have no other procedures or mechanisms to deal with conflicts of interest.

Currency Fluctuations

We maintain our accounts in Canadian dollars.  Our operations in Panama may make us subject to foreign currency fluctuations.  Panama's currency, the Balboa, is at parity with the U.S. dollar.  Exchange transactions are allowed in U.S. dollars and, as a result, foreign currency fluctuations will only be material for us to the extent that fluctuations between the Canadian and U.S. dollar are material.  We do not at present plan, nor do we plan in the future, to engage in foreign currency transactions to hedge any exchange rate risks.

Additional Funding Requirements

We have not generated cash flow from operations in the past and cash flow is not expected in the next few years to satisfy our operational requirements and cash commitments.  In the past, we have relied on sales of equity securities to meet most of our cash requirements, together with project management fees, property payments and sales or joint ventures of properties.  There can be no assurance that funding from these sources will be sufficient in the future to satisfy our operational requirements and cash commitments.



---

- 15 -



We do not presently have sufficient financial resources to undertake all of our planned exploration and development programs.  The development of our properties depends upon our ability to obtain financing through any or all of the joint venturing of projects, debt financing, equity financing or other means. There is no assurance that we will be successful in obtaining the required financing.  Failure to obtain additional financing on a timely basis could cause us to forfeit our interest in our properties and reduce or terminate our operations on such properties.  Accordingly, in their report on the consolidated financial statements for the period ended January 31, 2006, our independent auditors included an explanatory paragraph regarding concerns about our ability to continue as a going concern.  Our financial statements contain additional note disclosures describing the circumstances that lead to this disclosure by our independent auditors.

In particular, although we have entered into an agreement whereby Teck Cominco Limited can earn 50% of our interest in the Ley Petaquilla Property, by funding the feasibility study and our capital costs, there is no assurance that Teck Cominco Limited will elect to participate or to continue to participate in such property, in which event we will be required to finance all future exploration and development, or seek another partner.  Pursuant to our agreement with Teck Cominco Limited, Teck Cominco Limited can, at any time prior to a property reaching "commercial" production, elect to abandon and surrender its interest in any property.

Requirements of Ley Petaquilla

Our operations in Panama are governed primarily by Law No. 9 of the Legislative Assembly of Panama (the "Ley Petaquilla"), a project-specific piece of legislation enacted in February 1997 to deal with the orderly development of the Petaquilla Property.  The Ley Petaquilla granted a mineral exploration and exploitation concession to Minera Petaquilla, S.A.  Under the Ley Petaquilla, Minera Petaquilla, S.A. was required to begin mine development by May 2001; however, Minera Petaquilla, S.A. can defer commencing development operations for one month for every month that the price of copper remains below $1.155 per pound for up to a further five years (i.e. until May 2006 at the latest).  The Ley Petaquilla also requires Minera Petaquilla, S.A. to make a minimum investment of US $400 million in the development of the Petaquilla Property.  During the fiscal year ended January 31, 2002, we recorded a write-down of $32,628,433 in respect of our Petaquilla Property as a result of depressed copper prices making development of the Petaquilla Property uneconomical at that time.



PTQ, through our wholly-owned subsidiary Georecursos, owns 52% of Minera Petaquilla. Minnova (Panama) Inc. (Minnova), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Inmet Mining Corporation (Inmet), owns the remaining 48% of Minera Petaquilla, a company formed during 1997 to own the Ley Petaquilla mineral concession in Panama. Pursuant to the contract law under which the Petaquilla concession was granted by the Government of the Republic of Panama, PTQ has delivered a phased Mine Development Plan to the Government of Panama.  This phased Mine Development Plan was approved in September 2005. Refer also to Item 4  Information on our Company  A. History and Development of our Company. This approval resulted in the extension of the land tenure for an initial 20 year period commencing September 2005, subject to PTQ meeting certain other development and operational conditions on an ongoing basis. Terms of the land tenure have two additional 20 year terms that are also subject to PTQ meeting certain other ongoing development and operational conditions.



Teck Cominco Limited (Teck) has an option to acquire 50% of PTQs interest in Minera Petaquilla, which would result in Teck having a 26% interest in Minera Petaquilla. In order for Teck to acquire the 26% interest, it is required to:



---

- 16 -





i)

Fund 52% of the continuing exploration expenditures, as defined, of Minera Petaquilla, with Minnova to fund its 48% share, until such time as Teck either acquires its interest or its interest is terminated.



ii)

Fund 100% of and complete a final feasibility study, as defined, for the property and deliver such study by January 21, 1998 (completed).



iii)  Arrange project financing for Minera Petaquilla for completion of development of the Ley Petaquilla property and, if necessary, fund 52% (Minnova to fund 48%) of any shortfall in the total project funding requirement in excess of arranged project financing.



Teck is committed to annually make a final commitment respecting development of the concession and to deliver an update to the feasibility study of the concession. The requirement to make a final commitment or give notice of unfavorable economic conditions within 90 days of delivery of the final feasibility study applies to all subsequent annual anniversaries. Failure to make such a commitment or deliver a notice shall result in the termination of Tecks right to acquire an interest in Minera Petaquilla.



In April 2005, PTQ and Inmet agreed to waive for one year Tecks obligation to make a final commitment respecting development of the concession and to deliver an updated feasibility study. This waiver does not affect Tecks obligation to make a final commitment respecting development of the concession and to deliver an updated feasibility study in 2006.



Upon Teck making a final commitment, Minnova is required to deliver a final commitment to participate in the development of the project or it will be required to dispose of its interest in Minera Petaquilla. Minnova is then required to either offer to sell its interest in the concession or accept an 8% net profit interest, as defined, in the project. The offer to sell its interest shall be made first to PTQ and then to Teck at a price to be determined by Minnova. In the event that neither PTQ nor Teck chooses to acquire Minnovas interest, Minnova shall be entitled to seek an independent purchaser of its interest on terms no more favorable than those offered to PTQ and Teck.



Either PTQ or Minnova (the Proposer) may at any time give notice to the other parties of its intention to proceed with development of the concession in accordance with the most recently delivered Teck feasibility study. Upon receipt of such notice, Teck has 50 days in which to make a final commitment to develop the project. The other party, PTQ or Minnova (the Recipient), has 60 days from the receipt of such notice to commit to develop the project.



If the Recipient has not agreed to develop the project, the Proposer may, within 70 days of the proposal, elect to exercise the Shotgun Offer, as defined, and either sell its interest or acquire the Recipients interest in Minera Petaquilla, for cash, based on the value of Minera Petaquilla as determined in accordance with the provisions of the agreement. The Recipient has 15 days from receipt of the Shotgun Offer to agree either to sell its interest or to acquire the Proposers interest as applicable, and in the event that the Recipient does not take action within the 15-day period, it will thereafter be deemed to have agreed to sell its interest in Minera Petaquilla.



If Minnova sells its interest, pursuant to the Shotgun Offer, PTQ shall pay Minnova 48% of the value of Minera Petaquilla.



If PTQ sells its interest, pursuant to the Shotgun Offer, it shall receive 29% of the value of Minera Petaquilla on condition that, in the event that Tecks interest in the concession is terminated, PTQ shall receive an additional 23% of the value of Minera Petaquilla.



---

- 17 -



If Tecks interest in the concession is not terminated and PTQ sells its interest, pursuant to the Shotgun Offer, PTQ shall not be entitled to receive any further amount, in excess of the 29% of the value received on account of the sale of its interest in Minera Petaquilla.



Upon exercise of the Shotgun Offer, Teck has 130 days in which to deliver a final commitment for development of the concession or its interest shall be terminated.



Tecks interest in the concession shall terminate on the earlier of:



i)

Teck electing to terminate its interest provided it has delivered its final feasibility study, or



ii)

Tecks failure to deliver a final commitment requesting development of the concession and to deliver an updated feasibility study.



In the event that Tecks interest is terminated, Teck shall retain a net profit royalty interest in the project at a rate to be determined.



The Government of Panama passed legislation which significantly expands the size of the Panama Canal Watershed in general and, in particular, establishes an overlap of part of the Petaquilla concession.  It is possible that future construction of dams within the watershed area could negatively affect the development of the Ley Petaquilla property.  In late April 2006, the Government of Panama indicated they will introduce legislation to repeal their earlier law on expanding the size of the Panama Canal Watershed, which includes the aforementioned overlap.  There is no guarantee such repeal legislation will ultimately be passed by the Government of Panama.



Molejon Property  Panama



In June 2005, the shareholders of Minera Petaquilla agreed to separate the gold deposit and other precious metal mineral deposits that might be developed within the Ley Petaquilla mineral concession from the copper mineral deposits within the Ley Petaquilla mineral concession. The agreement provides for PTQ, through Petaquilla Gold, S.A., to own a 100% interest in the Molejon gold deposit, as well as all other gold and precious metal mineral deposits that might be developed within the Ley Petaquilla mineral concession, subject to a graduated 1% - 5% Net Smelter Return, based on the future gold price at the time of production, payable to Teck and Minova as to 35.135% and 64.865% respectively.



Approval of the overall phased Ley Petaquilla Mine Development Plan was obtained in September 2005. The Molejon gold mineral deposit is part of the Ley Petaquilla concession lands. Transfer of title to PTQ of the Molejon gold mineral deposit, as well as the other rights as described above, is underway.

We intend to focus the first phase of the mine development plan on the Molejon gold deposit.  We have begun further exploration and development work with the view of moving toward completion of a feasibility study on the Molejon gold deposit.  In addition, we intend to perform further exploration on other identified gold targets within the Ley Petaquilla concession, and those within our wholly-owned properties surrounding the Ley Petaquilla concession.  Refer to Item 4 - Information on Our Company - D. Property, Plant and Equipment for further details on planned development activities.

History of Net Losses; Accumulated Deficit; Lack of Revenue From Operations

We have incurred net losses to date.  Our deficit as of January 31, 2006, was $51,558,632.  We have not yet had any revenue from the exploration activities on our properties.  The Molejon Property is our first property development activity. Even if we undertake development activity on any of our properties, including the Molejon Property, we may continue to incur losses beyond the period of commencement of such activity.  There is no certainty that we will produce revenue, operate profitably or provide a return on investment in the future.  During the fiscal year ended January 31, 2002, we recorded a write-down of $32,628,433 in respect of our Petaquilla Property as a result of depressed copper prices making development of the Petaquilla Property uneconomical at that time.  Recent significant increases in metal commodity prices may not be sustainable.  They may not be reliable as indicators of future consistent realizable values, should any of PTQs mineral deposits reach commercial production.



---

- 18 -



Limited Experience with Development-Stage Mining Operations

We have limited experience in placing resource properties into production and our ability to do so will be dependent upon using the services of appropriately experienced personnel or entering into agreements with other major resource companies that can provide such expertise.  There can be no assurance that we will have available to us the necessary expertise when and if we place our resource properties into production.  There also exists significant risks on being successful at recruiting experienced employees or contractors to allow us to move forward in pursuing development-stage mining operations.

Stock Subject to Penny Stock Rules

Our capital stock would be classified as "penny stock" as defined in Rule 15g-9 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "1934 Act").  In response to perceived abuse in the penny stock market generally, the 1934 Act was amended in 1990 to add new requirements in connection with penny stocks.  In connection with effecting any transaction in a penny stock, a broker or dealer must give the customer a written risk disclosure document that (a) describes the nature and level of risk in the market for penny stocks in both public offerings and secondary trading, (b) describes the broker's or dealer's duties to the customer and the rights and remedies available to such customer with respect to violations of such duties, (c) describes the dealer market, including "bid" and "ask" prices for penny stock and the significance of the spread between the bid and ask prices, (d) contains a toll-free telephone number for inquiries on disciplinary histories of brokers and dealers, and (e) defines significant terms used in the disclosure document or the conduct of trading in penny stocks.  In addition, the broker-dealer must provide to a penny stock customer a written monthly account statement that discloses the identity and number of shares of each penny stock held in the customer's account, and the estimated market value of such shares.  The extensive disclosure and other broker-dealer compliance related to penny stocks may result in reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market for such stocks, thus limiting the ability of the holder to sell such stock.

Competition

Significant and increasing competition exists for the limited number of mineral property acquisition opportunities available.  As a result of this competition, some of which is with large established mining companies with substantial capabilities and greater financial and technical resources than us, we may be unable to acquire additional attractive mineral properties on terms we consider acceptable.  Accordingly, there can be no assurance that our exploration and acquisition programs will yield any new reserves or result in any commercial mining operation.

Mineral Prices

The mining industry in general is intensely competitive and there is no assurance that, even if commercial quantities of minerals are discovered, a profitable market will exist for the sale of same. Factors beyond our control may affect the marketability of any substances discovered.  The prices of gold and copper have experienced volatile and significant price movements over short periods of time and are affected by numerous factors beyond our control, including international economic and political trends, expectations of inflation, currency exchange fluctuations (specifically, the U.S. dollar relative to other currencies), interest rates and global or regional consumption patterns (such as the development of gold coin programs), speculative activities and increased production due to improved mining and production methods.  The supply of and demand for gold and copper is affected by various factors, including political events, economic conditions and production costs in major producing regions and governmental policies with respect to holdings by a nation or its citizens.  There can be no assurance that the prices of gold and copper will be such that our properties can be mined at a profit.



---

- 19 -



Foreign Countries and Regulatory Requirements

Currently our only properties are located in Panama.  Consequently, we are subject to certain risks associated with foreign ownership, including currency fluctuations, inflation, political instability and political risk.  Mineral exploration and mining activities in foreign countries may be affected in varying degrees by political stability and government regulations relating to the mining industry. Any changes in regulations or shifts in political conditions are beyond our control and may adversely affect our business. Operations may be affected in varying degrees by government regulations with respect to restrictions on production, price controls, export controls, restriction of earnings distribution, taxation laws, expropriation of property, environmental legislation, water use and mine safety.  In particular, the status of Panama as a developing country may make it more difficult for us to obtain any required production financing for our properties from senior lending institutions.

Environmental and Other Regulatory Requirements

Our current or future operations, including development activities and commencement of production on our properties, require permits from various governmental authorities and such operations are and will be subject to laws and regulations governing prospecting, development, mining, production, exports, taxes, labour standards, occupational health, waste disposal, toxic substances, land use, environmental protection, mine safety, community services and other matters.  Companies engaged in the development and operation of mines and related facilities generally experience increased costs, and delays in production and other schedules as a result of the need to comply with applicable laws, regulations and permits.  There can be no assurance that approvals and permits required to commence production on our various properties will be obtained.  Additional permits and studies, which may include environmental impact studies conducted before permits can be obtained, may be necessary prior to operation of the properties in which we have interests and there can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain or maintain all necessary permits that may be required to commence construction, development or operation of mining facilities at these properties on terms which enable operations to be conducted at economically justifiable costs.

Our potential mining and processing operations and exploration activities in Panama are subject to various federal and provincial laws governing land use, the protection of the environment, prospecting, development, production, exports, taxes, labour standards, occupational health, waste disposal, toxic substances, mine safety, community services and other matters.  Such operations and exploration activities are also subject to substantial regulation under these laws by governmental agencies and may require that we obtain permits from various governmental agencies.  We believe we are in substantial compliance with all material laws and regulations which currently apply to our activities.  There can be no assurance, however, that all permits we may require for construction of mining facilities and conduct of mining operations will be obtainable on reasonable terms or that such laws and regulations would not have a material adverse effect on any mining project we might undertake.

Failure to comply with applicable laws, regulations, and permitting requirements may result in enforcement actions thereunder, including orders issued by regulatory or judicial authorities causing operations to cease or be curtailed, and may include corrective measures requiring capital expenditures, installation of additional equipment, or remedial actions.  Parties engaged in mining operations may be required to compensate those suffering loss or damage by reason of the mining activities and may have civil or criminal fines or penalties imposed for violations of applicable laws or regulations.



---

- 20 -



Amendments to current laws, regulations and permits governing operations and activities of mining companies, or more stringent implementation thereof, could have a material adverse impact on us and cause increases in capital expenditures or production costs or reduction in levels of production at producing properties or abandonment or delays in development of new mining properties.

To the best of our knowledge, we are currently operating in compliance with all applicable environmental regulations.

Panama Political Risks

Mineral exploration and mining activities in Panama may be affected in varying degrees by political conditions and government regulations relating to the mining industry.  Any changes in regulations or shifts in political conditions are beyond our control and may adversely affect our business. Operations may be affected in varying degrees by government regulations with respect to restrictions on production, price controls, export controls, income taxes, expropriation of property, environmental legislation and mine safety.

Dividends

All of our available funds will be invested to finance the growth of our business and, therefore, investors cannot expect and should not anticipate receiving a dividend on our common shares in the foreseeable future.

Our Officers and Directors Resident Outside U.S.; Potential Unenforceability of Civil Liabilities and Judgments

PTQ and our officers and directors are residents of countries other than the United States, and all of our assets are located outside the United States.  As a result, it may not be possible for investors to effect service of process within the United States upon such persons or enforce in the United States against such persons judgments obtained in United States courts, including judgments predicated upon the civil liability provisions of United States federal securities laws or state securities laws.

We believe that a judgment of a United States court predicated solely upon civil liability under United States securities laws would probably be enforceable in Canada if the United States court in which the judgment was obtained has a basis for jurisdiction in the matter that was recognized by a Canadian court for such purposes.  However, there is doubt whether an action could be brought in Canada in the first instance on the basis of liability predicated solely upon such laws.

If We are Unable to Successfully Develop and Subsequently Generate Sufficient Cash Flow from Our Properties, We Could be Treated as a Passive Foreign Investment Company for U.S. Tax Purposes, Possibly Resulting in Additional Taxes to Our U.S. Stockholders and Less Liquidity for the Stock

We, as a foreign corporation with U.S. stockholders, could potentially be treated as a passive foreign investment company ("PFIC") for U.S. tax purposes.  U.S. stockholders owning shares of a PFIC can be subject to adverse tax consequences.  In general, we would be considered a PFIC if:  75% or more of our gross income in a taxable year is passive income such as dividends and interest; or, the average percentage of our assets (by value) during the taxable year which produce passive income or which are held for production of same is at least 50%.  A U.S. stockholder owning shares of a PFIC, who does not make certain elections for tax purposes, is subject to an additional tax and to an interest charge based on the value of deferral of tax for the period during which the common shares of the PFIC are owned.  Also, a gain realized on the disposition of common shares of the PFIC would be treated as ordinary income rather than capital gains.  If U.S. stockholders are subject to adverse tax consequences related to their ownership of our stock, they might be less willing to acquire the stock, which could result in reduced market activity and liquidity for our stock.



---

- 21 -



ITEM 4.  INFORMATION ON OUR COMPANY

A.  History and Development of Our Company

Our company, Petaquilla Minerals Ltd., is a British Columbia company engaged in the acquisition, exploration, exploration management, development and sale of mineral properties.  PTQ was incorporated under the laws of the Province of British Columbia, Canada, on October 10, 1985, by registration of our Memorandum and Articles with the British Columbia Registrar of Companies.  We have seven subsidiaries.  Petaquilla Copper Ltd., a direct wholly-owned subsidiary, was incorporated in British Columbia on March 15, 2006.  Adrian Resources (BVI) Ltd., a direct wholly-owned British Virgin Islands subsidiary, owns all of the issued shares of Petaquilla Minerals, S.A., a Panamanian corporation, which holds title to certain of our exploration concessions in the Republic of Panama.  Georecursos Internacional, S.A., a Panamanian corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Petaquilla Minerals, S.A., holds a 52% interest in the Petaquilla Property through our shareholding in Minera Petaquilla, S.A. (subject to Teck Cominco Limited's right to acquire 50% of such interest) and also holds certain other exploration concessions in the Republic of Panama.  Petaquilla Gold, S.A. is also a Panamanian corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Petaquilla Minerals, S.A.  Petaquilla Gold, S.A. was formed on August 11, 2005, to hold the Molejon property interest and other potential gold deposits within the Ley Petaquilla Concession lands.  Compañìa Minera Belencillo, S.A., a Panamanian corporation, was created on September 21, 2005, in accordance with the agreement signed between Adrian Resources, S.A. and Madison Enterprises (Latin American), S.A.  PTQ owns 100% of Compañìa Minera Belencillo, S.A., which holds a 100% interest in Zone 2 of the Rio Belencillo Concession and 68.88% of Zone 1, subject to an option by Madison Enterprises (Latin American), S.A. to earn a 31.12% interest in Zone 1 of the Rio Belencillo Concession.  On May 7, 2005, PTQ entered into an option agreement with Gold Dragon Capital Management Ltd. (Gold Dragon) whereby Gold Dragon could earn a 100% interest in the concession lands by the expenditure of USD $500,000 over two years on mutually agreed upon property expenditures.

On October 12, 2004, we changed our name from Adrian Resources Ltd. to Petaquilla Minerals Ltd..  The name change was approved by our shareholders at our annual and extraordinary general meeting held on July 23, 2004.  On February 3, 2005, we changed the name of our subsidiary from Adrian Resources, S.A. to Petaquilla Minerals, S.A.

Our head office and principal office address is located at Suite 1820, 701 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V7Y 1K8, Canada.  Our telephone number is 604-694-0021.

Acquisition of the Petaquilla Property, Panama

We have a 52% interest in the Petaquilla Property, which interest is subject to the right of Teck Cominco Limited to acquire 50% of our interest, as more fully described under "Item 4 - Information on Our Company - D. Property, Plant and Equipment".

Financing Agreement with Teck Corporation

By agreement dated April 29, 1991, we entered into a financing agreement (the "Teck Agreement") with Teck Corporation (now Teck Cominco Limited) of Vancouver, British Columbia, under which we agreed to grant to Teck Cominco Limited the right to earn 50% of, among other things, our interest in the Petaquilla Property by funding our obligations with respect to exploration and development of such property.  Pursuant to the Teck Agreement, we are obligated to offer to enter into an agreement with Teck Cominco Limited on the same terms and conditions as contained in the Teck Agreement with respect to any mineral property interests acquired by us after the date of the Teck Agreement (each such acquired mineral property interest is a "Project").



---

- 22 -



Under the Teck Agreement, if we elect to prepare a preliminary feasibility study with respect to a Project, then upon completion of the study, we must present the preliminary feasibility study to Teck Cominco Limited.  Teck Cominco Limited may then elect, within 90 days from receipt of the preliminary feasibility study, to prepare (or cause to be prepared), within 24 months after receipt of the preliminary feasibility study, a final feasibility study at Teck Cominco Limited's cost (including the cost of any further exploration work as may be necessary to complete the final feasibility study).  Teck Cominco Limited may then elect, within 90 days after receipt of the final feasibility study, to exercise its right to finance the Project.  If Teck Cominco Limited so elects, we will be obligated to transfer 50% of our interest in the Project to Teck Cominco Limited.  In addition, Teck Cominco Limited will have the right to become a member of any joint venture which is overseeing or otherwise conducting Project operations or to become the operator of the Project, subject to our existing contractual requirements in respect of the Project. Teck Cominco Limited's failure to exercise its right with respect to a particular Project does not preclude it from exercising that right at some future date in respect of other Projects.  If, however, Teck Cominco Limited elects not to proceed after receiving a preliminary feasibility study or does not elect to provide or arrange financing for a particular Project within 90 days after the completion of a final feasibility study, Teck Cominco Limited will be deemed to have surrendered and abandoned its right to finance that Project and acquire any interest therein.  In addition, at any time prior to the commencement of commercial production, Teck Cominco Limited may elect to abandon and surrender its interest in the Project by notifying us of such election.

If Teck Cominco Limited elects to prepare a final feasibility study and to provide production financing, we are not required to incur any further expenditures to bring the Project into commercial production.  However, all costs incurred by Teck Cominco Limited will be reimbursed to Teck Cominco Limited prior to us receiving any proceeds from production, as described below.

Once the Project has been placed into commercial production, the aggregate net proceeds available to us and Teck Cominco Limited are to be distributed in the following manner:

(1)

first, to repay third party debt financing;

(2)

thereafter, 100% of the net proceeds are to be paid to Teck Cominco Limited until all costs incurred by Teck Cominco Limited from the time of completion of a final feasibility study (including costs related to the financing) together with an amount sufficient to fully discharge and release Teck Cominco Limited from certain obligations and liabilities with respect to the property are paid;

(3)

thereafter, 50% of the net proceeds will be utilized to reimburse the parties' other exploration and development costs and the remaining 50% will be divided equally between Teck Cominco Limited and our company; and

(4)

thereafter, 100% of the net proceeds will be divided equally between Teck Cominco Limited and our company.

If we intend to sell or receive an offer to purchase all or any of our interest in a Project, Teck Cominco Limited has a right of first refusal to purchase same.  The Teck Agreement also provides that Teck Cominco Limited has a right of first refusal, subject to existing contractual requirements for consents and third party rights, to acquire on an abandonment, our remaining interest in a Project.  Teck Cominco Limited also has the right to participate, to the extent Teck Cominco Limited elects, in each equity financing undertaken by us prior to December 31, 2010.



---

- 23 -



It is our position that the Teck Agreement does not apply to other properties or interests held or acquired by us, either directly or indirectly, through our subsidiaries.

Molejon Property  Panama



In June 2005, the shareholders of Minera Petaquilla agreed to separate the gold deposit and other precious

metal mineral deposits that might be developed within the Ley Petaquilla mineral concession from the copper mineral deposits within the Ley Petaquilla mineral concession. The agreement provides for PTQ, through Petaquilla Gold, S.A., to own a 100% interest in the Molejon gold deposit, as well as all other gold and precious metal mineral deposits that might be developed within the Ley Petaquilla mineral concession, subject to a graduated 1% - 5% Net Smelter Return, based on the future gold price at the time of production, payable to Teck and Minova as to 35.135% and 64.865% respectively.



Approval of the overall phased Ley Petaquilla Mine Development Plan was obtained in September 2005. The Molejon gold mineral deposit is part of the Ley Petaquilla concession lands. Transfer of title to PTQ of the Molejon gold mineral deposit, as well as the other rights as described above, is underway.



During the current fiscal year, PTQ incurred the following costs related to the Molejon gold deposit. These costs have been capitalized on our audited consolidated balance sheet as mineral property costs:



| | Trenching               |  | $            811,037 | 
| | ----------------------- |  | -------------------- | 
| | Administration support  |  | 352,250              | 
| | Road                    |  | 293,407              | 
| | Engineering and geology |  | 275,372              | 
| | Camp costs              |  | 197,300              | 
| | Assaying                |  | 167,434              | 
| | Drilling                |  | 106,842              | 
| | Permits and licences    |  | 81,097               | 
| | Data management         |  | 59,825               | 
| | Community service plan  |  | 45,205               | 
| |                         |  | $          2,389,769 | 



Mineral Properties - Other



We hold various interests in other land concession areas adjacent to the Ley Petaquilla Property in Panama, including the Rio Belencillo and Rio Petaquilla concessions.

By an Agreement dated May 7, 2005 and amended on June 10, 2005, Gold Dragon Capital Management Ltd. (Gold Dragon), has an option to purchase all of PTQs interest in the Rio Belencillo and Rio Petaquilla concessions by the expenditure of $100,000 in approved exploration costs by May 7, 2007, an additional $400,000 in approved exploration costs by February 7, 2008, and by then paying PTQ $1,152,400. This sum is payable in shares of Gold Dragon.



---

- 24 -



Directors and Officers of Our Company

Effective February 1, 2005, our Board of Directors consisted of Kenneth W. Morgan, Michael Levy, Patrick Downey, and Richard Fifer.  Our officers were Kenneth W. Morgan as Chief Financial Officer and Secretary, Michael Levy as President, and Richard Fifer as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.  On March 23, 2005, Richard Fifer resigned as our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.  Richard Fifer continues to serve in a non-executive role and maintains his position as a director of PTQ.  On April 1, 2005, Patrick Downey resigned as a director and on April 25, 2005, Marco Tejeira was appointed as a director of our company.  On July 5, 2005, John Purkis was also appointed as a director of our company.  At PTQs annual and special general meeting held on July 29, 2005, Richard Fifer, Michael Levy, Kenneth W. Morgan, John Purkis, and Marco Tejeira were reappointed as directors.  At the same meeting, Michael Levy was reappointed as President and Kenneth W. Morgan was reappointed as Chief Financial Officer and Secretary.  On December 13, 2005, John Purkis resigned as a director.  On January 18, 2006, Graham Scott replaced Kenneth W. Morgan in the role of Corporate Secretary with Kenneth W. Morgan retaining his roles as Chief Financial Officer and as a director.  On February 15, 2006, John Cook was appointed as a director.  On February 26, 2006, Kenneth W. Morgan resigned as Chief Financial Officer but continues to serve as a director.    On March 1, 2006, John S. Watt was appointed our Chief Financial Officer.

Principal Capital Expenditures/Divestitures Over Last Three Fiscal Years

During the current fiscal year, we have incurred $2,389,769 in Molejon property expenses that have been capitalized as mineral property costs. During the year ended January 31, 2002, we sold 4,950,690 shares we held in Hyperion Resources Ltd. for $116,955. We continue to hold 37,500 of such shares. On February 10, 2005, we sold 500,000 of our own shares on the Toronto Stock Exchange at a price of $0.65 per share. These shares were previously issued and reacquired by us some years ago pursuant to an issuer bid. Accordingly, there was no change to the number of shares issued and outstanding as a result of this sale. We will use the proceeds of the sale for general working capital purposes.

Current and Planned Capital Expenditures/Divestitures

We have either ongoing or anticipated significant capital expenditures or possible optioning of our property interests during the fiscal year ending January 31, 2007.  In relation to the planned exploration and development of the Molejon property, we anticipate having expenditures of approximately $15,000,000 to $20,000,000 during the fiscal year ending January 31, 2007.  However, this expenditure is subject to further analysis and to our ability to obtain financing.  There is no assurance that we will be successful in obtaining financing.

Public Takeover Offers

During the current and previous fiscal year, we have not received any public takeover offers from third parties nor have we made any such takeover offers.



---

- 25 -



B.  Business Overview

We currently have no significant properties in Canada and we are not actively exploring, or seeking to acquire interests in, mineral properties in Canada.  Since our acquisition of an interest in the Petaquilla concession (the "Petaquilla Property") in Panama in 1992, our primary focus has been exploring and developing our Petaquilla Property and other mineral properties in the Republic of Panama.

We acquired our interests in the Petaquilla Property in 1992 and 1993 through two separate series of transactions more fully described under the heading "Item 4 - Information on Our Company - D. Property, Plant and Equipment".

Our principal operations in Panama are governed primarily by  Law No. 9 of the Legislative Assembly of Panama (the "Ley Petaquilla"), a project-specific piece of legislation enacted in February 1997 to deal with the orderly development of the Petaquilla Property.  The Ley Petaquilla granted a mineral exploration and exploitation concession to Minera Petaquilla, S.A., a Panamanian corporation in which we have a 52% interest, covering approximately 136 square kilometers in north-central Panama.  In order to maintain the Petaquilla Property in good standing, Minera Petaquilla, S.A. must pay to the Government of Panama an annual rental fee of US $1.00 per hectare during the first five years of the concession, US $2.50 per hectare in the sixth to the tenth years of the concession and US $3.50 per hectare thereafter.  Initially, the annual rental was approximately US $13,600 payable by Minera Petaquilla, S.A. and funded pro rata by its shareholders.  The current annual rental is approximately US $34,000. The concession was granted for a 20-year term with up to two 20-year extensions permitted subject to the requirement to begin mine development and make a minimum investment described below.

The Ley Petaquilla contains fiscal and legal stability clauses necessary in order to obtain project financing for Petaquilla and includes tax exemptions on income, dividends and imports.  The Ley Petaquilla also provides for an increase in the annual available infrastructure tax credit, higher depreciation rates for depreciable assets which cannot be used in the infrastructure tax credit pool and a favorable depletion allowance.

Under the Ley Petaquilla, Minera Petaquilla, S.A. was required to begin mine development by May  2001.  However, Minera Petaquilla, S.A. was able to defer commencing development operations for one month for every month that the price of copper remains below $1.155 per pound for up to a further five years (i.e. until May 2006 at the latest).  Pursuant to the contract law under which the Petaquilla concession was granted by the Government of the Republic of Panama, PTQ has delivered a phased Mine Development Plan to the Government of Panama.  This phased Mine Development Plan was approved in September 2005.  Refer also to Item 3  Key Information  D. Risk Factors.  This approval resulted in the extension of the land tenure for an initial 20 year period commencing September 2005, subject to PTQ meeting certain other development and operational conditions on an ongoing basis.  Terms of the land tenure have two additional 20 year terms that are also subject to PTQ meeting other ongoing development and operational conditions.  The Ley Petaquilla also requires Minera Petaquilla, S.A. to make a minimum investment of US $400 million in the development of the Petaquilla Property.  During the fiscal year ended January 31, 2002, we recorded  a write-down of $32,628,433 in respect of our Petaquilla Property as a result of depressed copper prices making development of the Petaquilla Property uneconomical at that time.

C.  Organizational Structure

The following chart sets out our corporate structure and the mineral properties owned by each of our subsidiaries:



---

- 26 -







[page26002.gif]



---

-27-



D.  Property, Plant and Equipment

All our properties except for the Ley Petaquilla are in the exploration stage only and are without a known body of commercial ore.  We have no producing properties and have not had any revenue from any mineral in the last three fiscal years.

Petaquilla Property, Panama

Introduction

We own, through our indirect share ownership in Minera Petaquilla, S.A., a 52% interest in the Petaquilla Property.  Under the Petaquilla Shareholders Agreement, Teck Cominco Limited has the right to acquire 50% of our interest in the Petaquilla Property, subject to satisfaction of various requirements, including the preparation and funding of a final bankable feasibility study, which has been completed, and the provision of all production financing.  See "Title" below for more details.

The Petaquilla Property contains a large copper-gold porphyry system as well as an epithermal gold deposit, both amenable to open pit mining.  To date, exploration has identified eight copper-gold porphyry deposits along with one epithermal gold deposit.

In August 1994, Kilborn Engineering (Pacific) Ltd. ("Kilborn"), an independent consulting engineering firm, completed a preliminary feasibility study on the Petaquilla and Botija copper-gold deposits.  This preliminary feasibility study was updated by Kilborn in February 1995 and, collectively, the study and the update are referred to as the Preliminary Study (non-National Instrument 43-101 compliant).  The Preliminary Study recommended additional development of the Petaquilla and Botija deposits and preparation of a final feasibility study to assess the economic viability of the deposits as an open pit operation with a projected milling rate of 60,000 tonnes per day, based on estimated total diluted mineable reserves of 579 million tonnes grading 0.52% copper, 0.12 g/t gold and 0.014% molybdenite for a projected mine life of 26.4 years.  At this rate, an average 227 million recoverable pounds of copper, 52,000 recoverable ounces of gold and 4.8 million recoverable pounds of molybdenite were projected to be produced annually.  See "Preliminary Feasibility Study - Operating Plan" below.

In February 1996, Fluor Daniel Wright Ltd. ("FDW") completed a production scoping study (the "Scoping Study" - non-National Instrument 43-101 compliant) on the Botija, Petaquilla, Valle Grande and Molejon deposits in order to provide an updated assessment of the total mineral resources within the Petaquilla Property and to determine the probable mining scenario to be used.  The Scoping Study updated and consolidated mineral reserve information for the Botija, Petaquilla, Valle Grande and Molejon deposits.  Based on estimated measured and indicated diluted mineable reserves of 1.461 billion tonnes grading 0.493% copper, 0.11 g/t gold and 0.015% molybdenite, FDW concluded that the optimum throughput rate for open pit mining of these deposits was 120,000 tonnes per day for a projected mine life of 33.4 years.  FDW estimated that at this rate an average 411 million recoverable pounds of copper, 95,000 recoverable ounces of gold, and 8.6 million recoverable pounds of molybdenite would be produced annually.  See "Production Scoping Study - Operating Plan" below.

In January 1998, H.A. Simons Ltd. ("Simons"), on behalf of Teck Cominco Limited, completed a final bankable feasibility study (the "Final Study" - non-National Instrument 43-101 compliant) on the Petaquilla, Botija, and Valle Grande copper-gold deposits and the Molejon gold deposit.  The Final Study concluded that the mineable reserves for the Petaquilla, Botija and Valle Grande deposits (measured and indicated only) currently total 1.115 billion tonnes using a variable economic cut-off grade of between US $5.10 and US $6.50/tonne (including a low grade stockpile of 130 million tonnes to be milled at the end of the mine life).  A marginal cut-off grade of US $2.92/tonne was used for the low-grade stockpile.



---

-28-





Based on an estimated throughput of 120,000 tonnes per day resulting in a mine life of 23 years, the Final Study estimated that an average 419 million recoverable pounds of copper, 61,000 recoverable ounces of gold, and 5.8 million recoverable pounds of molybdenite would be produced annually.  The Final Study examined the Molejon deposit as an alternate case and did not include production therefrom in its base case analysis.  See "Final Study - Operating Plan" below.

In June 2005, the shareholders of Minera Petaquilla agreed to separate the gold deposit and other precious metal mineral deposits that might be developed within the Ley Petaquilla mineral concession from the copper mineral deposits within the Ley Petaquilla mineral concession.  The agreement provides for PTQ, through Petaquilla Gold, S.A., to own a 100% interest in the Molejon gold deposit, as well as all other gold and precious metal mineral deposits that might be developed within the Ley Petaquilla mineral concession, subject to a graduated 1% - 5% Net Smelter Return, based on the future gold price at the time of production, payable to Teck and Minnova as to 35.135% and 64.865% respectively.



Approval of the overall phased Ley Petaquilla Mine Development Plan was obtained in September 2005. The Molejon gold mineral deposit is part of the Ley Petaquilla concession lands. Transfer of title to PTQ of the Molejon gold mineral deposit, as well as the other rights as described above, is underway.

Our development focus is the first phase of the mine development plan on the Molejon gold deposit.  We have began further exploration and development work for the purposes of a feasibility study on the Molejon gold deposit.  In addition, we intend to perform further exploration on other identified gold targets within the Minera Petaquilla concession, and those within our wholly-owned properties surrounding the Minera Petaquilla concession.

During the coming months of calendar 2006, the shareholders of Minera Petaquilla, S.A. will revise and update the January 1998 Feasibility Study (the 1998 Feasibility Study) completed by H.A. Simons (now AMEC) for the Petaquilla Copper Project, to more accurately reflect current prices and technological advances.



Calendar 2006 Ley Petaquilla Concession Copper Deposit Plans



Minera Petaquilla, S.A. is owned by PTQ and Inmet Mining Corporation (Inmet) as to 52% and 48% interests respectively;  Teck Cominco Ltd. (Teck Cominco) has the right to acquire 50% of PTQs interest by funding all of PTQs share of costs to commercial production.  The work required to revise and update the 1998 Feasibility Study will be funded by Teck Cominco, Inmet and PTQ, and the completion date for the revised study is expected to be September 30, 2006.



AMEC Americas Limited (AMEC) has been engaged to carry out this revision, which will include the following specific assessments:



·

Reviewing the truck and shovel fleet equipment selection, with a view to the utilization of larger equipment.

·

Reviewing the grinding circuit capacity to determine if a single grinding line would provide the capacity required for the 120,000 tpd throughput rate.

·

Reviewing the flotation equipment selection in light of the larger equipment currently available.

·

For any of the above revised approaches that appear technically feasible, to estimate their capital and operating cost impacts on the Project to the prefeasibility level (+/- 25% to +/-30%).



---

-29-





The 1998 Feasibility Study was prepared prior to the introduction of National Instrument 43-101, and refers to categories of reserves which are not the same as those contained in the current National Instrument.  The 1998 Feasibility Study refers to measured and indicated mineable reserves, which we believe are reliable and relevant.  PTQ is of the view that such categories are materially equivalent to proven and probable mineral reserves in the current National Instrument.



Building upon the Minera Petaquilla update referred to above, PTQ will finance 100% of the costs of a full National Instrument 43-101-compliant Feasibility Study on the Petaquilla Copper Project.  This effort will be carried out by PTQ in cooperation with our existing partners, Teck and Inmet, as well as with our new potential Chinese partner.

The collective goal of this effort is to assure that all relevant data required for project financing considerations are made available by the end of 2006.

Location, Access & Physiography

The Petaquilla Property is comprised of a mineral exploration and exploitation concession granted on February 26, 1997, as Law No. 9 of the Legislative Assembly of Panama (the "Ley Petaquilla") to Minera Petaquilla, S.A. covering approximately 136 square kilometers in north-central Panama.

The Petaquilla Property is located approximately 75 miles west of Panama City, 6 miles from the Caribbean coast and lies within the Donoso District of Colon Province of the Republic of Panama.  Access to the Petaquilla Property, including the Molejon property, is primarily by helicopter.  PTQ is presently constructing a twelve kilometer dirt road from Coclesito, a village of approximately 700 inhabitants, to the mine site.  This road will replace a network of trails, which was the previous access, and the new road portion will ultimately be upgraded to rural paved status as part of ongoing development work.  In addition, thirty kilometers of dirt road, accessible only by four-wheel drive vehicles during the rainy season, connects Coclesito with La Pintada, a town of 5,000 people on the country's paved highway network.  This road will also be upgraded to rural paved status as part of future ongoing development work.  The Petaquilla Property is at an elevation of approximately 500 to 825 feet above sea level and falls within the rainfall shadow of the continental divide.  The climate of the Petaquilla Property is characteristic of tropical rainforests. Precipitation is high throughout the year - up to three meters per annum.  The heaviest precipitation is evenly distributed from May to December and January to April are typically the driest months.



---

-30-





Property Location

[pages27to125001.jpg]

Plant and Equipment

There is no underground or surface plant or equipment on the Petaquilla Property, other than the base camp erected in January 2005 to facilitate the exploration and development program being carried out on the Molejon gold deposit.

Title



Ley Petaquilla Property - Panama



The Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiary Georecursos, owns 52% of Minera Petaquilla. Minnova (Panama) Inc. (Minnova), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Inmet Mining Corporation (Inmet), owns the remaining 48% of Minera Petaquilla, a company formed during 1997 to own the Ley Petaquilla mineral concession in Panama. Pursuant to the contract law under which the Petaquilla concession was granted by the Government of the Republic of Panama, PTQ has delivered a phased Mine Development Plan to the Government of Panama.  This phased Mine Development Plan was approved in September 2005. Refer also to Item 4  Information on our Company  A. History and Development of our Company.  This approval resulted in the extension of the land tenure for an initial 20 year period commencing September 2005, subject to PTQ meeting certain other development and operational conditions on an ongoing basis. Terms of the land tenure have two additional 20 year terms that are also subject to PTQ meeting certain other ongoing development and operational conditions.



Teck Cominco Limited (Teck) has an option to acquire 50% of the Companys interest in Minera Petaquilla, which would result in Teck having a 26% interest in Minera Petaquilla. In order for Teck to acquire the 26% interest, it is required to:



i)

Fund 52% of the continuing exploration expenditures, as defined, of Minera Petaquilla, with Minnova to fund its 48% share, until such time as Teck either acquires its interest or its interest is terminated.



---

-31-





ii)

Fund 100% of and complete a final feasibility study, as defined, for the property and deliver such study by January 21, 1998 (completed).



iii)

Arrange project financing for Minera Petaquilla for completion of development of the Ley Petaquilla property and, if necessary, fund 52% (Minnova to fund 48%) of any shortfall in the total project funding requirement in excess of arranged project financing.



Teck is committed to annually make a final commitment respecting development of the concession and to deliver an update to the feasibility study of the concession. The requirement to make a final commitment or give notice of unfavorable economic conditions within 90 days of delivery of the final feasibility study applies to all subsequent annual anniversaries. Failure to make such a commitment or deliver a notice shall result in the termination of Tecks right to acquire an interest in Minera Petaquilla.



In April 2005, PTQ and Inmet agreed to waive for one year Tecks obligation to make a final commitment respecting development of the concession and to deliver an updated feasibility study. This waiver does not affect Tecks obligation to make a final commitment respecting development of the concession and to deliver an updated feasibility study in 2006.  Refer to D. Property, Plant and Equipment; Calendar 2006 Ley Petaquilla Concession Copper Deposit Plan.



Upon Teck making a final commitment, Minnova is required to deliver a final commitment to participate in the development of the project or it will be required to dispose of its interest in Minera Petaquilla. Minnova is then required to either offer to sell its interest in the concession or accept an 8% net profit interest, as defined, in the project. The offer to sell its interest shall be made first to PTQ and then to Teck at a price to be determined by Minnova. In the event that neither PTQ nor Teck chooses to acquire Minnovas interest, Minnova shall be entitled to seek an independent purchaser of its interest on terms no more favorable than those offered to PTQ and Teck.



Either PTQ or Minnova (the Proposer) may at any time give notice to the other parties of its intention to proceed with development of the concession in accordance with the most recently delivered Teck feasibility study. Upon receipt of such notice, Teck has 50 days in which to make a final commitment to develop the project. The other party, PTQ or Minnova (the Recipient), has 60 days from the receipt of such notice to commit to develop the project.



If the Recipient has not agreed to develop the project, the Proposer may, within 70 days of the proposal, elect to exercise the Shotgun Offer, as defined, and either sell its interest or acquire the Recipients interest in Minera Petaquilla, for cash, based on the value of Minera Petaquilla as determined in accordance with the provisions of the agreement. The Recipient has 15 days from receipt of the Shotgun Offer to agree either to sell its interest or to acquire the Proposers interest as applicable, and in the event that the Recipient does not take action within the 15-day period, it will thereafter be deemed to have agreed to sell its interest in Minera Petaquilla.



If Minnova sells its interest, pursuant to the Shotgun Offer, PTQ shall pay Minnova 48% of the value of Minera Petaquilla.



If PTQ sells its interest, pursuant to the Shotgun Offer, it shall receive 29% of the value of Minera Petaquilla on condition that, in the event that Tecks interest in the concession is terminated, PTQ shall receive an additional 23% of the value of Minera Petaquilla.



If Tecks interest in the concession is not terminated and PTQ sells its interest, pursuant to the Shotgun Offer, PTQ shall not be entitled to receive any further amount, in excess of the 29% of the value received on account of the sale of its interest in Minera Petaquilla.



---

-32-





Upon exercise of the Shotgun Offer, Teck has 130 days in which to deliver a final commitment for development of the concession or its interest shall be terminated.

Tecks interest in the concession shall terminate on the earlier of:



i)

Teck electing to terminate its interest provided it has delivered its final feasibility study, or



ii)

Tecks failure to deliver a final commitment requesting development of the concession and to deliver

an updated feasibility study.



In the event that Tecks interest is terminated, Teck shall retain a net profit royalty interest in the project at a rate to be determined.



The Government of Panama passed legislation which significantly expands the size of the Panama Canal Watershed in general and, in particular, establishes an overlap of part of the Petaquilla concession.  It is possible that future construction of dams within the watershed area could negatively affect the development of the Ley Petaquilla property.



Molejon Property  Panama



In June 2005, the shareholders of Minera Petaquilla agreed to separate the gold deposit and other precious metal mineral deposits that might be developed within the Ley Petaquilla mineral concession from the copper mineral deposits within the Ley Petaquilla mineral concession. The agreement provides for PTQ, through Petaquilla Gold, S.A., to own a 100% interest in the Molejon gold deposit, as well as all other gold and precious metal mineral deposits that might be developed within the Ley Petaquilla mineral concession, subject to a graduated 1% - 5% Net Smelter Return, based on the future gold price at the time of production, payable to Teck and Minova as to 35.135% and 64.865% respectively.

Approval of the overall phased Ley Petaquilla Mine Development Plan was obtained in September 2005. The Molejon gold mineral deposit is part of the Ley Petaquilla concession lands. Transfer of title to PTQ of the Molejon gold mineral deposit, as well as the other rights as described above, is underway.

Mineral Properties  Other



PTQ holds various interests in other land concession areas adjacent to the Ley Petaquilla Property in Panama, including the Rio Belencillo and Rio Petaquilla concessions.

By an Agreement dated May 7, 2005 and amended on June 10, 2005, Gold Dragon Capital Management Ltd. (Gold Dragon), has an option to purchase all of PTQs interest in the Rio Belencillo and Rio Petaquilla concessions by the expenditure of $100,000 in approved exploration costs by May 7, 2007, an additional $400,000 in approved exploration costs by February 7, 2008 and by then paying PTQ $1,152,400. This sum is payable in shares of Gold Dragon.

Exploration History

The potential for copper porphyry deposits within the Petaquilla area was first recognized in February 1968 by members of a United Nations Development Program team who were carrying out a regional geological and geochemical survey of central Panama.  The U.N. team subsequently completed 37 short diamond drill holes totaling 9,000 feet on the newly discovered Petaquilla, Botija and Vega deposits.  In July 1969, the Panamanian government tendered the exploration rights to Petaquilla to international bidders and in July 1971 the concession was awarded to Panama Mineral Resources Development Company ("PMRD"), a consortium of seven Japanese copper companies.  The three main members were Mitsui Mining and Smelting Co., Dowa Mining Co. and Mitsubishi Metal Corp.  An extensive drill program consisting of 51 diamond drill holes totaling 41,500 feet, followed by preliminary reserve calculations, metallurgical test work and a positive feasibility study (based on a mill rate of 18,000 tonnes/day) was completed on the Petaquilla and Botija deposits by PMRD between 1977 and 1980 before the project was abandoned due to difficulties in negotiating a development agreement with the then Panamanian government under the mining statute in effect at the time.



---

-33-





No further development occurred until the concession which originally comprised the Petaquilla Property was granted to Georecursos Internacional, S.A. in August 1991.

Neither the United Nations nor PMRD analyzed their drilling and surface sampling for gold.  As such, the only existing gold data is that accumulated by us.  Drilling to date has shown that the distribution and intensity of gold values within mineralized zones varies directly with areas of elevated copper and depleted molybdenum contents.

Exploration - Results Obtained by Us or on Our Behalf

A program of rock sampling and geochemical surveying was carried out by Inmet Mining Corporation in late 1990, followed by the establishment of 60 line-miles of surveyed grid (the "Faldalito-Petaquilla grid").  After assuming operation of the Petaquilla Property in May 1992, we undertook a comprehensive exploration program involving line cutting, ground magnetic surveying, soil geochemistry and diamond drilling.  This work focused on corroborating the reported grade of copper-molybdenum mineralization in the Botija and Petaquilla deposits, evaluating their gold potential, testing their tonnage and grade potential along strike, to depth and up-dip, and carrying out the groundwork necessary for developing drill targets outside the limits of the two deposits.

The existing Faldalito-Petaquilla grid was extended east over the Botija deposit and south over the Vega area.  A total of 32.4 line-miles of additional grid were cut and surveyed between April and July 1992.  A total field magnetic survey was carried out over all cross lines and selected baselines of the grid in July and August of that year.  Soil samples were taken at 164 foot (50 meter) intervals in selected portions of the grid.  These included areas shown to be anomalous by the Faldalito-Petaquilla grid sampling, the surface trace of the Botija deposit, and part of the Vega area.  Soil samples were analyzed geochemically for gold, silver, copper and molybdenum.  Ten diamond drill holes, totaling 6,970 feet were drilled in August and September 1992 on the Botija and Petaquilla deposits.  The 1992 drilling gave a preliminary indication of gold distribution within the Petaquilla and Botija deposits and an indication of relative gold enrichment at the core of the Botija deposit and at the Southwest Zone of the Petaquilla deposit.

The bulk of the 1993 exploration program consisted of diamond drilling.  Forty-six holes totaling 33,774 feet were drilled on the Petaquilla, Botija, Botija Abuja and Vega deposits.  Approximately two-thirds of the footage was drilled on the Botija deposit, demonstrating the continuity of mineralization in the relatively high grade West/Main Zone and confirming that this zone remains well-mineralized and open down-dip to the north.  The systematic evaluation of mineralization in Botija's East Zone was begun and an initial hole in its Central Zone intersected grades and degrees of thickness in excess of those initially expected by us.

Diamond drilling of the Petaquilla deposit focused on defining the extent and grade of near-surface copper-gold mineralization in the Southwest Zone.  Near the end of the program, alteration similar to the Southwest Zone was drilled in the west-central portion of the Petaquilla deposit and returned copper-gold grades similar to those of the Southwest Zone, indicating that this style of mineralization might be more widespread within the deposit.

Three other porphyry prospects, two of them newly-discovered, were drilled on the Petaquilla concession in 1993.  Two holes were drilled in the Vega area, confirming the existence of a large, mineralized porphyry system there.  Eleven holes were drilled on the Botija Abajo deposit, defining a zone of alteration and mineralization similar in appearance, grade and size to Petaquilla's Southwest Zone.  A single hole tested an extensive area of intense alteration with secondary chalcocite in the Brazo area.



---

-34-





Concurrent with this diamond drilling, a program of soil sampling, prospecting and geological mapping was carried out at the Botija Abajo, Brazo and Medio areas of the concession.

Our 1994 exploration program on the Petaquilla Property was successful in expanding reserves, discovering new deposits and outlining new, prospective zones of mineralization and anomalous geochemistry.  Reserves at the Petaquilla and Botija deposits were expanded and delineated by additional diamond drilling.  New zones of porphyry copper-gold and skarn mineralization were added to the existing mineralization at the Vega deposit.  Soil grid extensions, geological mapping and geophysics led to the discovery of a significant epithermal gold-silver deposit at Molejon.  Follow-up drilling at Brazo defined significant porphyry copper-gold mineralization.  Geological mapping and geochemical surveys established new zones of mineralization at Botija Norte and Lata.

Forty-five per cent of the 1994 drilling on the concession was directed at the Botija deposit.  Most of this was infill drilling in the West/Main zone and focused on upgrading the reserves to measured and indicated status.  Six successful drill holes in the Central zone, including hole B94-105 that intersected 236.5 meters of 0.59% copper and 0.11g/t gold, added new reserves to the deposit.  Three of these holes bottomed in mineralization due to faulted ground.  One step-out hole drilled in the East zone extended the mineralized zone to the east.

The Petaquilla deposit received 8,031 feet (2448.5 metres) of infill and stepout drilling in eight holes in 1994.  This drilling further defined reserves throughout the deposit.  Breccia bodies along the granodiorite-andesite contact have been noted as important controls for mineralization at this deposit, particularly in the Southwest zone.

Follow-up mapping and prospecting of the soil geochemical anomalies in the Rio Molejon area discovered gold mineralization in Quebrada Molejonose.  Following the discovery, hole MO94-57, which intersected 45.0 meters containing 3.82 g/t gold, and 7.30 g/t silver, 4156.0 meters of drilling was completed.  The Molejon deposit consists of three sub-parallel, northeast-striking, gently southwest-dipping, quartz vein breccia zones in a sequence of feldspar-quartz porphyries and andesitic volcanics.  All three of these zones are exposed at, and remain near, the surface laterally and down-dip.  The attitude and location of these breccia zones should make them amenable to bulk-tonnage, open-pit mining with low stripping ratios.  The Molejon deposit also remains open laterally and down-dip.

Additional diamond drilling at the Vega deposit in 1994 added tonnage to the existing northwest-trending deposit and defined a new mineralized block 200 meters to the northwest of the previous block.  This deposit consists of porphyry copper-gold and skarn mineralization related to a brecciated andesite-granodiorite contact, similar to the breccias observed at the Petaquilla deposit.  During the 1995 diamond drilling program, the Valle Grande area northwest of the Vega deposit was drill-tested with 95 drill holes.  Encouraging results were obtained from this program with values of up to 0.94% copper, 0.09 g/t gold and 0.04% molybdenite over 97.0 meters in hole V95-210 and 1.09% copper, 0.07 g/t gold and 0.03% molybdenite over 182.3 meters in hole VG95-223.  As drilling continued through 1995, the Valle Grande deposit proved to be joined with the Vega deposit to form what is now known as the Valle Grande deposit.

Six more holes were drilled at the Brazo deposit to follow up on hole BR93-52, which intersected strongly mineralized quartz-feldspar-porphyry.  Drilling was conducted at an area of anomalous gold-molybdenum-copper soil geochemistry underlain by the Brazo feldspar-quartz porphyry.  This porphyry is argillically altered at surface and contains stockwork quartz veining with chalcopyrite, pyrite and secondary chalcocite.  The Brazo deposit remains open down-dip.  The deposit is hosted within the Brazo porphyry and andesitic volcanics that are phyllically to argillically altered and contain abundant stockwork quartz veining.  A blanket of secondary copper enrichment commonly overlies this deposit.



---

-35-





The Botija Abajo deposit is a porphyry copper-gold deposit that is very similar to the Brazo deposit and we consider that it may form part of the same mineralized system.  It is hosted within argillic to phyllic altered Brazo feldspar-quartz-porphyry and is truncated by the northeast-trending Brazo fault.  Secondary copper mineralization, as chalcocite, is also present at this deposit.  One drill hole was carried out on this deposit in 1994 and much of the geochemical anomaly that marks this deposit remains untested by drilling.

The Petaquilla, Valle Grande, Molejon, Brazo and Botija Abajo deposits appear related to intersecting structural trends.  The Petaquilla, Valle Grande and Molejon deposits lie along a northwest trend that is marked by magnetic anomalies.  The Botija Abajo, Brazo and Molejon deposits lie along a northeast trend also marked by magnetic anomalies.  These three deposits are located where this northeast-trending magnetic and soil geochemical anomaly is intersected by northwest-trending geochemical anomalies.

In addition to these deposits, there are several areas throughout the Petaquilla Property that we consider merit further examination.  There are extensions to the Petaquilla geochemical anomaly in the Faldalito area that have not been fully tested.  Prospecting and extensions to the soil grid north of the Botija deposit have identified a large area of anomalous copper-gold-molybdenum soil geochemistry.  Andesitic volcanics intruded by altered and copper-mineralized porphyritic granodiorites have been mapped in the Botija Norte area.  Two drill holes were collared in this zone and intersected limited mineralization within altered granodiorites that are similar to those in the Botija deposit.

To the end of 1995, a total of 506 drill holes (totaling 332,300 feet or 101,311 metres) had been completed on the Petaquilla Property's nine deposits (Petaquilla, Botija, Valle Grande, Molejon, Botija Abajo, Brazo, Nada, Faldalito and Cuatro Crestas) and various other mineral occurrences.  We had also completed prospecting and preliminary soil sampling on approximately 80% of the Petaquilla Property and ground magnetics surveying on approximately 70% of the Petaquilla Property by the end of 1995.

Between January and May 1996, a 120 hole program of feasibility study diamond drilling was carried out on the Petaquilla, Botija and Valle Grande deposits.  The program included approximately 36 condemnation holes at proposed sites for waste dumps, stockpiles, tailings facilities and the milling complex.  Throughout the rest of 1997, Teck Cominco Limited continued its work on the final feasibility study on these deposits (as well as the Molejon gold deposit).  The 1997 feasibility study work program included:

(a)

sufficient additional drilling as is warranted to define starter pit reserves (copper-equivalent grade in excess of 0.7%) in the Rio Medio area and any other areas which might be discovered as a result of such drilling;

(b)

additional drilling of the Petaquilla deposit at spacing which accords with the search parameters used in the calculation of proven and probable mineable reserves;

(c)

detailed assessment of the Molejon deposit in the feasibility study both as part of the copper mining operations and as a stand-alone gold operation with additional drilling as set out in (b) above if required;

(d)

a test program of large diameter diamond drill core bulk sampling and metallurgical testing in at least two of the pit areas to determine whether this indicates a significant positive difference from previous metallurgical results, and appropriate follow-up work if it does; this work to include, at a minimum, a total of 20 tonnes of HQ size drill core from the Botija and Petaquilla pits (estimated to be approximately 3,200 meters of drilling); the identification of a pyrite depressant and other parameters to yield industry standard copper and moly recoveries in the bulk concentrate circuit; mini-scale (200kg/hour) piloting to produce bulk concentrate for cleaning testwork; confirmation of regrind size for bulk concentrate cleaning; mineralogy and flotation testing; analysis of the effect of grind size on metallurgical performance for the mining plan composites for use in optimization studies; confirmation of industry standard moly recovery (90%) in the copper-moly circuit and confirmation of moly concentrate impurity levels; completion of grinding index testwork (crushing, rod mill and ball mill Bond indices) for use in optimization studies; completion of ore abrasion index tests to confirm grinding steel consumption rates;



---

-36-





(e)

a comprehensive study of the relative advantages and disadvantages of land based and submarine tailings disposal, including economic, environmental and social considerations;

(f)

an assessment of the feasibility of dump leaching of prestripped saprolite and low grade material, having regard to consequent acid utilization and dispersal;

(g)

all environmental studies which are required in order to obtain commitments for project financing; and

(h)

optimization of mine and plant design and location, recalculation of reserves, and an assessment of operating costs and optimum throughput based on the results of the foregoing work; the final bankable feasibility study to include reserve calculations by two independent engineering consulting firms using such search parameters as each firm deems appropriate, as well as full mining plans and financial analyses based on the reserves calculated by each firm; these mining plans and financial analyses will assume mill throughput rates of 90,000 and 120,000 tonnes per day, and additional mining plans and analyses may be undertaken to examine increasing throughput during the mine life from 90,000 to 120,000 tonnes per day.

In December 2004, we resumed exploration and development of identified gold targets within the Minera Petaquilla S.A. project and, by January 2005, had a base camp established in preparation for a survey and trenching program.  The Molejon gold deposit was subsequently surveyed and trenched to better understand gold metallurgy and potential open pit configurations.  The topography of the Molejon property was mapped over a much wider area than previously and the information gathered will be used in the next phase of designing the planned open pit.  With respect to the trenching program, in excess of 5,000 metres of trenching was completed in 2005 with over 3,000 samples collected and assayed.  The trenching program allowed us to better analyze the metallurgy, particularly the gold mineralization, occurring at the surface. The results provided information used to define the placement of drill holes as we advance towards a feasibility study.

The first assay results received from the 2005 trenching program came from the initial test trenches on the Molejon Northwest Zone, an area which had never been tested with trenches before March 2005 although surface drilling in the 1990s had indicated a near surface gold resource.  The assay results were notable and led our technical team to believe that drilling of the Northwest Zone could lead to an expansion of the gold reserves at Molejon.  Shortly thereafter, we received favourable trenching results suggesting good continuity of gold mineralization in the Molejon Northwest Zone as the trenching program exposed contiguous, in situ gold mineralization from within a metre of the surface in the Northwest zone.  As these trenching results had shown high-grade gold shoots existed within the Northwest Zone, we re-sampled a selection of low and high-grade intersections in order to confirm the initial results.  The second sampling duplicated the initial assay results from the first channel samples.

In June 2005, we continued to receive encouraging gold values from the trenching program and, by August 2005, we released another set of high grade trenching results including assays of over 100 gr/t.  The trenching in August revealed that grades in the Main Zone of Molejon were higher than previously indicated, the 244 Area of the Main Zone returned grades in excess of 100 gr/t, the Northwest Zone had been expanded and is now over 340 meters across, the Northwest Zone had returned grades in excess of 40 gr/t, the Central zone had returned grades in excess of 18 gr/t, and new areas of mineralization had been discovered within the original pit boundaries.

In January 2006, a 200-metre strike length of high-grade gold mineralization in the Central Zone was delineated during a follow-up trenching program on the Molejon gold deposit.  Overall, the trenching program resulted in a significant reinterpretation of the Molejon mineralization.



---

-37-





At the same time, we commenced a 16,400 foot or 5,000 metre 58-hole diamond drilling program on the Molejon gold deposit.  The 2006 program is primarily designed to provide in-fill and extension drilling on the southern part of the deposit, to assist in the completion of a feasibility study and to confirm the location of the starter pit.  The 58-hole diamond drilling program will bring the separation between existing drill holes down to 20 to 35 metres and step out drilling will be performed where trenching has identified new targets.  By mid-April 2006, we had the analytical results for the first 17 holes and continue to receive encouraging results with the majority of core holes intercepting shallow, continuous gold mineralization.

The following charts detail assay results provided by ALS Chemex for the first 17 holes of the 2006 58-hole drilling program:



|Hole MO-06-01                                        January 29, 2006
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                     
|From         (m)                                                     
|                                                                     
|0.00                                                                 
|1.50                                                                 
|3.00                                                                 
|4.50                                                                 
|6.00                                                                 
|7.00                                                                 
|8.50                                                                 
|10.00                                                                
|11.50                                                                
|13.00                                                                
|14.50                                                                
|16.00                                                                
|17.50                                                                
|19.00                                                                
|20.50                                                                
|22.00                                                                
|23.50                                                                
|25.00                                                                



|Hole MO-06-02                                                             January 30, 2006
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                          
|From         (m)                                                                          
|                                                                                          
|1.50                                                                                      
|3.00                                                                                      
|4.50                                                                                      
|5.50                                                                                      
|7.00                                                                                      
|8.50                                                                                      
|10.00                                                                                     
|11.50                                                                                     
|14.50                                                                                     
|16.00                                                                                     



---

-38-







|17.50 | 19.00 | FQPO | 97  | 1.86  | Mineralized
|----- | ----- | ---- | --- | ----- | -----------
|19.00 | 20.50 | FQPO | 93  | 2.11  | Mineralized
|20.50 | 22.00 | FQPO | 86  | 9.02  | Mineralized
|22.00 | 23.50 | QZBX | 96  | 3.6   | Mineralized
|23.50 | 25.00 | QZBX | 82  | 16.05 | Mineralized
|25.00 | 26.50 | QZBX | 65  | 0.65  |            
|26.50 | 28.00 | ANTF | 86  | <.05  |            
|28.00 | 29.50 | ANTF | 85  | <.05  |            
|29.50 | 31.00 | ANTF | 81  | 0.23  |            
|31.00 | 32.50 | FQPO | 100 | <.05  |            
|32.50 | 34.00 | FQPO | 100 | 0.29  |            
|34.00 | 35.50 | FQPO | 92  | 0.38  |            
|35.50 | 37.00 | FQPO | 82  | 0.37  |            
|37.00 | 38.50 | FQPO | 76  | 0.12  |            
|38.50 | 40.00 | FQPO | 90  | 0.3   |            
|40.00 | 41.50 | FQPO | 90  | 1.34  |            
|41.50 | 43.00 | FQPO | 90  | 0.22  |            
|43.00 | 44.50 | FQPO | 90  | 0.12  |            
|44.50 | 46.00 | FQPO | 88  | 0.74  |            
|46.00 | 47.50 | FQPO | 96  | <.05  |            
|47.50 | 49.00 | FQPO | 99  | <.05  |            
|49.00 | 50.50 | FQPO | 93  | 0.08  |            
|50.50 | 52.00 | FQPO | 88  | 0.05  |            
|52.00 | 53.50 | FQPO | 89  | 0.35  |            
|53.50 | 55.00 | FQPO | 88  | <.05  |            
|55.00 | 56.50 | FQPO | 78  | <.05  |            
|56.50 | 58.00 | FQPO | 70  | <.05  |            
|58.00 | 59.50 | FQPO | 78  | <.05  |            
|59.50 | 61.00 | FQPO | 82  | <.05  |            
|61.00 | 62.50 | FQPO | 96  | <.05  |            
|62.50 | 64.00 | FQPO | 94  | 0.06  |            



|Hole MO-06-02                                                              January 30, 2006
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                           
|From    (m)                                                                                
|                                                                                           
|64.00                                                                                      
|65.50                                                                                      
|67.00                                                                                      
|68.50                                                                                      
|70.00                                                                                      
|71.50                                                                                      
|73.00                                                                                      
|74.50                                                                                      
|76.00                                                                                      
|77.50                                                                                      
|79.00                                                                                      
|80.50                                                                                      
|82.00                                                                                      
|83.50                                                                                      
|85.00                                                                                      
|86.50                                                                                      
|88.00                                                                                      
|89.50                                                                                      
|91.00                                                                                      
|92.50                                                                                      





---

-39-







|Legend for lithology abbreviations
|----------------------------------
|ANAG                              
|ALM                               
|SA                                



|Hole Number | Interval        (m) | Thickness      (m) | Grade (g/tonne)                                     | Host Rock           
|----------- | ------------------- | ------------------ | --------------------------------------------------- | --------------------
|            |                     |                    |                                                     |                     
|MO-06-03    |                     |                    | Hole did not intersect significant mineralization   |                     
|MO-06-04    |                     |                    | Hole did not intersect significant mineralization   |                     
|MO-06-05    |                     |                    | Shallow hole did not have significant interceptions |                     
|MO-06-06    |                     |                    | Hole did not intersect significant mineralization   |                     
|MO-06-07    | 24.0 - 34.0         | 10                 | 5.2                                                 | BRHM                
|MO-06-08    | 0.0 - 25.0          | 25                 | 6.2                                                 | BRHM, FQPO          
|MO-06-09    | 6.0 -15.5           | 9.5                | 5.9                                                 | SAP, QZBX           
|MO-06-10    | 1.4 -10.0           | 8.6                | 5.5                                                 | QZBX, FSPO          
|MO-06-11    | 6.0 - 39.3          | 33.3               | 7.4                                                 | SAP, FQPO, QZBX     
|MO-06-12    | 25.9 - 52.0         | 26.1               | 5.6                                                 | QZBX, FSPO          
|MO-06-13    | 0.0 - 22.0          | 22                 | 2.3                                                 | SAP, QZBX           
|MO-06-14    | 28.8 - 32.0         | 3.2                | 11.8                                                | QV                  
|MO-06-15    | 0.0 - 8.5           | 8.5                | 3.4                                                 | SAP, QZBX           
|MO-06-16    | 39.5 - 52.0         | 12.5               | 4.6                                                 | FQPO, ANFL, BR, FSPO
|MO-06-17    | 0.0 - 9.0           | 9                  | 3.9                                                 | SAP, QZBX           



|BRHM  Hematitic Breccia          | SAP  Saprolite          | QZBX  Quartz Breccia
|--------------------------------- | ------------------------ | ---------------------
|FQPO  Feldspar  Quartz Porphyry | FSPO  Feldspar Porphyry | ANFL  Andesite Flow 
|BR - Breccia                      | QV  Quartz Vein         |                      



The results from the 2006 drilling program along with the results from the 1994-1995 drilling program are anticipated to be capable of providing a reliable basis for resource estimation and pit modelling.





---

-40-





In October 2005, we received a current National Instrument 43-101 compliant mineral resource estimate on the Molejon gold deposit from SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc. (SRK).  SRK estimates inferred mineral resources at 0.5 g/t cut off were 11.2 million tonnes at 2.48 g/t Au. Inferred mineral resources at 0.5, 0.6 and 0.7 g/t Au cut-offs are included in the following table.



Table:  Mineral Resource Estimate at. 0.5, 0.6 and 0.7 g/t Au Cut-Offs

|                | Inferred Resources
|--------------- | ------------------
|Au g/t Cut -Off | Million Tonnes *  
|0.5             | 11.2              
|0.6             | 10.8              
|0.7             | 10.1              



(* Note: Tonnes and ounces have been rounded to reflect relative accuracy of the resource estimate.)



SRK found the drilling, sampling methods and approach, sample preparation, analysis, security (chain of custody), and quality assurance/quality control procedures (QA/QC) used during the exploration and delineation of the Molejon gold mineralization to be acceptable for resource estimation.

Based on the results of the resource estimate, SRK recommended that PTQ proceed with the planned infill drill program (program currently underway), use the infill drill data along with twinned holes to revalidate the previous drilling and surface trench results, and complete specific gravity and mineralogical testwork. Upon completion of this work, a re-estimation of resources is warranted in preparation for subsequent engineering studies. Additional metallurgical and geotechnical work is also recommended in preparation for future engineering work.

The October 2005 SRK report represents an increase of 35% over a pre-National Instrument 43-101 resource estimate of 7.8 million tones grading 2.63 grams for total contained gold of 661,000 ounces using a bottom cut-off grade of 0.500 g/t Au.



Regional and Local Geology

Panama is underlain by an island arc built upon late Cretaceous oceanic crust and is considered prospective for porphyry copper-gold-molybdenum deposits.

Andesitic tuffs and flows of presumed Early to Middle Tertiary age cover the majority of the Petaquilla Property which lies at the southern limit of a 400 square kilometre batholith, dated at 32.6+2 million years, which has intruded the older volcanic sequence.  The core of the batholith is composed of quartz monzonite, grading outward to granodiorite and porphyritic granodiorite.  The Petaquilla and Botija deposits are centered on porphyritic stocks and dykes lying peripheral to the southern margin of the batholith.

At the Botija deposit, the intrusive is a medium-grained, crowded porphyry composed of 25% plagioclase phenocrysts, 15% hornblende phenocrysts and 5-10% quartz grains in a feldspar rich matrix.  At the Petaquilla deposit, the intrusive is more obviously porphyritic, with a generally lower percentage of phenocrysts.  Contact phases and dykes at each deposit are finer-grained varieties of the main intrusive.  In particular, feldspar, hornblende, quartz porphyry dykes appear to be late stage phases of the granodiorite.  Most of these porphyry dykes post-date the mineralization, indicating that they were introduced during the waning stages of hydrothermal alteration and mineralization.  The youngest units encountered on the property are the unmineralized basalt and andesite dykes.



---

-41-





Copper-gold-molybdenum porphyry deposits have been identified and partially delineated at the Petaquilla and Botija deposits, which are centered four kilometers apart on an east-west trend within the Petaquilla Property.  Four types of well-developed alteration have been observed within the various intrusive units:  potassic, phyllic, quartz-chloritic and propylitic.  Potassic alteration is found near the core of the porphyry system and is not extensive.  It is characterized by quartz, potassium feldspar, biotite, sericite, and lesser amounts of anhydrite and magnetite.  The majority of copper mineralization is hosted in the phyllic altered rock, which is composed of quartz and sericite with minor kaolinite and K-spar.  Propylitic alteration, marked by chlorite, pyrite, calcite and epidote, marks the outer extent of alteration in a porphyry system.  The phyllic and quartz-chlonite alteration zones are usually found between the potassic core and the peripheral propylitic zone, although either may be missing.  Alteration of the andesitic volcanic units, characterized by prograde biotite hornfels and fine grained sulphide mineralization occurs when they are found to be proximal to the intrusive contact or within zones of intrusive dyking.

The Petaquilla deposit is largely hosted by porphyritic granodiorite below its intrusive contact with andesite forming a flat-lying to gently dipping sheet, trending east-west and dipping to the north.  It has been drilled for 1,600 meters along strike and remains open along strike to the south, east and west, and at depth.

The Valle Grande deposit is hosted dominantly by prophyritic granodiorite and similar to Petaquilla is a flat-lying sheet, trending northwest-southeast and dipping to the north.  It has been drilled for 2,400 meters along strike and is considered to have limited expansion potential.

The Botija deposit trends east-west and dips 20-30 degrees to the north or northeast.  It has been intersected by drilling along strike for 1,800 meters and up to 600 meters down dip. The Botija deposit remains open near surface to the south, along strike to the east and the west and in many places at depth both vertically and down dip to the north.

The general geology of the Molejon epithermal gold target is dominated by volcanic and subvolcanic intrusives including massive andesite flows, feldspar-porphyritic andesite flows, andesitic tuffs, and andesitic agglomerates.  This volcanic package has been intruded by feldspar-quartz porphyry and feldspar porphyry units.  A northeast trending fault is believed to be the major structural control for the emplacement of the hydrothermally altered quartz-carbonate breccia.

Mineralization

Mineralization at the Petaquilla, Valle Grande and Botija deposits is largely concentrated within potassic or phyllic altered porphyritic intrusives of granodioritic composition.  Volcanic-hosted copper mineralization, associated with strong biotite alteration, is widespread at the Petaquilla deposit and contributes significantly to its tonnage.  Mineralization in each deposit consists of chalcopyrite and pyrite as disseminations, within quartz veinlets and filling brittle, irregular fractures.  Pyrite content generally decreases with higher grade copper mineralization and increases towards the periphery of the deposits.  Chalcopyrite occurs most commonly as very fine disseminations within an altered intrusive matrix or biotite hornfels.  It is often associated with magnetite and/or chlorite or biotite altered mafic minerals, most notably in lower-grade sections of propylitic alteration.  Stockwork quartz veinlets are best developed within potassic alteration, where they crosscut pervasive silicification.  The irregular fracture-filling style of copper mineralization, which locally approaches a sulphide net, is largely confined to biotite-altered andesite at the Petaquilla deposit.  This is cut in places by narrow quartz-chalcopyrite veins which have developed bleached selvages of biotite destruction.  A fourth style of mineralization, consisting of chalcopyrite and pyrite coatings along steep, widely spaced, cooling joints, is confined to granodiorite along the eastern periphery of the Botija deposit.



---

-42-





Molybdenite is present mainly in quartz, carbonate, chalcopyrite veinlets hosted by granodiorite within the most intensely altered and mineralized portion of each deposit.  Bornite occurs locally with chalcopyrite and contributes significantly to the copper grade in some sections, mainly within hornfelsed andesites in the Petaquilla deposit.  Although leaching is widespread throughout the upper 10 to 30 meters of the deposits, supergene copper mineralization is not present in significant amounts.  Magnetite is an important accessory in both deposits, disseminated throughout both the porphyritic intrusives and the intruded andesite.

At the Molejon deposit, epithermal gold-silver mineralization occurs within structurally controlled zones of hydrothermal quartz-carbonate breccia and the fractured and altered rocks marginal to the quartz-carbonate breccia.  Assay boundaries of gold-silver mineralization are not sharply constrained by geological contacts.  Highest grade mineralization usually occurs in the quartz-carbonate breccia but economic mineralization also occurs in feldspar-quartz porphyry, and more rarely in feldspar-porphyritic andesite flows.

The Petaquilla Property, or certain parts of it, have been the subject of a preliminary feasibility study by Kilborn completed in August 1994, a production scoping study by FDW completed in February 1996 and a final feasibility study by H.A. Simons Ltd. completed in January 1998, all of which are reviewed below.

Preliminary Feasibility Study  Ley Petaquilla Copper Deposit

In August 1994, Kilborn completed a preliminary feasibility study on exploiting the Petaquilla and Botija deposits on the Petaquilla Property for copper, gold and molybdenum sulphide.  This preliminary study was updated by Kilborn in March 1995 (collectively, the "Preliminary Study"  non-National Instrument 43-101 compliant).  In February 1996, FDW completed a scoping study (non-National Instrument 43-101 compliant) on the Petaquilla, Botija, Valle Grande and Molejon deposits which updated certain of the reserve estimates in the Preliminary Study (see "Production Scoping Study" below).  A final bankable feasibility (non-National Instrument 43-101 compliant) on the Petaquilla, Botija, Valle Grande and Molejon deposits was completed by Teck Cominco Limited on in January 1998.

The following information is summarized from the Preliminary Study and is based on preliminary information and analysis.

Conclusion

In the Preliminary Study, Kilborn concluded that the data it reviewed with respect to the Petaquilla and Botija deposits supported additional development of the deposits and the detailed analysis and cost of completing a final feasibility study.

Reserves

In the Preliminary Study, Kilborn reviewed only the Petaquilla and Botija deposits and referred to measured and indicated reserves in its calculation of economically mineable reserves.  In determining optimal project economics, mineralized material was treated so as to maximize the resulting cash flow.  During the optimization process, an effective cut-off grade was generated as a part of the computations.  This grade has been calculated to be 0.20% copper equivalent which is considered to be a break-even grade, assuming that mining is already paid for and that mineralized material recovered will pay all other transport and processing costs.  This approach resulted in a base case showing diluted measured and indicated mineable reserves at the Petaquilla and Botija deposits of 579 million tonnes grading 0.52% copper, 0.12 g/t gold and 0.014% molybdenite.  The Preliminary Study states that there is a possibility that additional defined mineralization at Petaquilla and Botija could be converted into measured and indicated reserves with additional diamond drilling.  Addition of this mineralization could extend projected mine life.



---

-43-





Metallurgy

The Preliminary Study discusses the metallurgical testwork completed to date which indicates that the copper-gold concentrates produced from Petaquilla and Botija ores will have a copper grade of approximately 27.1% and a gold content of approximately 4.2 g/tonne.  The Bond Work Index for the ore will average approximately 12.7 kwh/dmt for the Petaquilla ore and approximately 13.6 kwh/dmt for the Botija ore.  Copper recoveries are estimated to be approximately 90% while gold recoveries are estimated to range from 60% to 75% (70% to 75% for Botija and 60% for Petaquilla).  Molybdenum sulphide recoveries have been estimated to range between 70% and 75%.   Metallurgical testwork suggests that the deposits will yield a relatively clean concentrate as mercury and arsenic levels are below the limits at which penalties are assessed.

Operating Plan

The following information is summarized from the Preliminary Study and is based on preliminary information and analysis.

The Preliminary Study recommends development of the Petaquilla and Botija deposits as an open pit operation with a milling rate of 60,000 tonnes per day to produce copper, gold and molybdenum flotation concentrates, based on estimated total diluted mineable reserves of 579 million tonnes grading 0.52% copper, 0.12 g/t gold, 0.014% molybdenite at a cutoff grade of 0.20% copper equivalent for a mine life of 26.4 years.  Average recoveries are estimated to be 90% for copper, 65% for gold and 72% for molybdenite.  At this rate, an average 227 million recoverable pounds of copper, 52,000 recoverable ounces of gold and 4.8 million recoverable pounds of molybdenite are projected by Kilborn to be produced annually.  For these purposes "recoverable ounces" or "recoverable pounds" means the amount of metal produced from diluted mineable reserves after taking into account milling losses based on projected average recoveries of 90% for copper, 65% for gold and 72% for molybdenite.  The project would have an initial stripping ratio of 0.74:1 increasing to a maximum of 1.19:1 in year 7, for an overall stripping ratio of 0.97:1.

The Preliminary Study's conclusions include the following key projected financial assumptions for operations based on the base case mineable reserve estimate.  The initial capital cost of placing the Petaquilla and Botija deposits into production is estimated at US $457 million, while ongoing capital costs are estimated to total US $215 million.  Major infrastructure costs included in initial capital costs are a new port facility at a cost of US $33 million and a diesel-powered electricity generation facility at a cost of US $41 million.  The initial capital cost estimate does not include "owner's costs" (i.e. initial working capital, financing costs etc.) which can be significant for a project of this scope.

The average net smelter return per tonne of ore was estimated to be US $7.71, while the average operating cost for the Petaquilla and Botija deposits is estimated at US $3.63 per tonne of ore.  The average on-site cash cost to produce one pound of copper was estimated at US $0.35.

Project economics were calculated in a base case that utilized only measured and indicated reserves in determining projected financial results.  There is a possibility that additional defined mineralization at the two deposits which do not meet the criteria for measured and indicated reserves (some 34% of the known mineralization at Petaquilla and some 28% of the known mineralization at Botija) could be converted into measured and indicated reserves with additional infill drilling.  This additional defined mineralization exists within the ultimate pit limits and could potentially allow for an extension of the mine life or a higher production rate. The Petaquilla and Botija deposits are also open to expansion outside their existing ultimate pit limits.



---

-44-





In addition to the base case scenario, a comparison was conducted in the Preliminary Study using a 0.50% copper equivalent cutoff grade.  Other than the higher cutoff grade, the comparison used the same parameters as the base case.  In this scenario, diluted mineable reserves of 320 million tonnes grading 0.64% copper, 0.12 g/t gold and 0.021% molybdenite would support a mine life of 14.7 years.

Base prices used in the Preliminary Study were US $1.00 per pound for copper, US $375 per ounce for gold and US $6.00 per pound for molybdenum.

There can be no assurance that the projected production or financial results for the Petaquilla and Botija deposits will actually be attained.

Environmental

The Preliminary Study indicates that permitting of mines in Panama is required by Recursos Minerales, part of which requires the mining company to submit an environmental report consisting of three documents, being the Preliminary Evaluation, an Environmental Reconnaissance Report and an Environmental Viability Report.

The Preliminary Study recommends baseline environmental and socioeconomic studies to be undertaken in order to comply with the requirements of Recursos Minerales, including:

(a)

topographical, surficial materials and soils mapping,

(b)

maintaining two meteorological stations to compile data on rainfall runoff characteristics, storm frequency, etc.,

(c)

a hydrology monitoring program,

(d)

a baseline water quality program,

(e)

studies to document aquatic biophysical habitat mapping and fish species population characteristics and stream sediment information,

(f)

inventory of vegetation and wildlife,

(g)

detailed archeological investigations,

(h)

studies of the potential social and economic benefits and negative impacts from the project on a local, regional and national scale.

The estimates in the Preliminary Study include a portion of the assay laboratory building being devoted to on-site environmental requirements, including start-up field and laboratory monitoring equipment.  Estimated operating costs for environmental requirements are included in the estimated mine operating costs, including permit monitoring, outside laboratory analyses and annual waste discharge permit fees.

The Preliminary Study indicates that we will likely be required to post a reclamation bond.  While the Preliminary Study suggests that reclamation of the project area is expected to be relatively straightforward, because of the stage of development of the project at this time there can be no assurance that costs associated with environmental requirements will not have an adverse effect on the project and our operating results.



---

-45-





Production Scoping Study  Ley Petaquilla Copper Deposit

In February 1996, FDW completed a scoping study (the "Scoping Study"  non-National Instrument 43-101 compliant) on the Botija, Petaquilla, Valle Grande and Molejon deposits in order to provide an updated assessment of the total mineral resources within the Petaquilla Property and to determine the probable mining plan to be implemented.  The following information is summarized from the Scoping Study and is based on preliminary information and analysis.  FDW's work was primarily focused on updating and consolidating ore reserve estimates and production schedule optimization.

Conclusion

Based on estimated measured and indicated diluted mineable reserves of 1.461 billion tonnes grading 0.493% copper, 0.11 g/t gold and 0.015% molybdenite (using a 0.35% copper equivalent cutoff grade), FDW concluded that the optimum throughput rate for open pit mining of the four deposits was 120,000 tonnes per day for a projected mine life of 33.4 years.

Reserves

In the Scoping Study, FDW reviewed only the Petaquilla, Botija, Valle Grande and Molejon deposits and referred to measured and indicated reserves in its calculation of economically mineable reserves.  In determining optimal project economics, mineralized material was treated so as to maximize the resulting cash flow.  During the optimization process, an effective cut-off grade was generated as a part of the computations.  This grade has been calculated to be 0.35% copper equivalent which is considered to be a break-even grade, assuming that mining is already paid for and that mineralized material recovered will pay all other transport and processing costs.  This approach resulted in a base case showing diluted measured and indicated mineable reserves at the four deposits of 1.461 billion tonnes grading 0.493% copper, 0.11 g/t gold and 0.015% molybdenite.

Metallurgy

The Scoping Study estimates average recoveries of 90% for copper, 60% for gold from the Molejon deposit, 65% for gold from the other deposits and 65% for molybdenite.  These estimates are based on the metallurgical conclusions of the Preliminary Study as well as subsequent testwork.

Additional metallurgical testwork will be required as part of a final feasibility study in order to confirm these estimates.

Operating Plan

The following information is summarized from the Scoping Study and is based on preliminary information and analysis.  The Scoping Study recommends development of the Petaquilla, Botija, Valle Grande and Molejon deposits as an open pit operation with a milling rate of 120,000 tonnes per day to produce copper, gold and molybdenum flotation concentrates, based on estimated total diluted mineable reserves of 1.461 billion tonnes grading 0.493% copper, 0.11 g/t gold and 0.015% molybdenite, at a cutoff grade of 0.35% copper equivalent for a mine life of 33.4 years.  Average recoveries are estimated to be 90% for copper, 60% for gold from the Molejon deposit, 65% for gold from the other deposits and 65% for molybdenite.  At this rate, an average 411 million recoverable pounds of copper, 95,000 recoverable ounces of gold, and 8.6 million recoverable pounds of molybdenite are projected to be produced annually.  In the case of the Scoping Study, "recoverable ounces" or "recoverable pounds" means the amount of metal produced from diluted mineable reserves after taking into account milling losses based on projected average recoveries of 90% for copper, 60% for gold from the Molejon deposit, 65% for gold from the other deposits and 65% for molybdenite.  The project would have an overall stripping ratio of 1.1:1.



---

-46-





The Scoping Study's conclusions include the following key projected financial assumptions for operations based on the base case mineable reserve estimate.  The initial capital cost of placing the Petaquilla, Botija, Valle Grande and Molejon deposits into production is estimated at US $825 million, while ongoing capital costs are estimated to total US $296 million.  The initial capital cost estimate is based on Kilborn's estimates in the Preliminary Study to which was applied a factor of 1.62 to account for the increased throughput.

Final Feasibility Study  Ley Petaquilla Copper Deposit

In January 1998, H.A. Simons Ltd. ("Simons") on behalf of Teck Cominco Limited, completed a final bankable feasibility study (the "Final Study"  non-National Instrument 43-101 compliant) on the Petaquilla, Botija, and Valle Grande copper-gold deposits and the Molejon gold deposit.  The following information is summarized from the Final Study.

Conclusion

Based on estimated measured and indicated diluted mineable reserves of 1.115 billion tonnes grading 0.50% Cu, 0.09 g/t Au, 0.155 MoS2 as well as recoverable silver using a variable economic cut-off grade of between US $5.10 and US $6.50/tonne (including a low grade stockpile of 130 million tonnes to be milled at the end of the mine life), the Final Study shows that the optimum throughput rate for open pit mining of the three deposits was 120,000 tonnes per day for a projected mine life of 23 years.

Reserves

In the Final Study, Simons reviewed only the Petaquilla, Botija and Valle Grande deposits and referred to measured and indicated reserves in its calculation of economically mineable reserves.  The Final Study concluded that the total mineable reserves in the Petaquilla, Botija and Valle Grande deposits (measured and indicated only) currently total 1.115 billion tonnes grading 0.50% Cu, 0.09 g/t Au, 0.155 MoS2 as well as recoverable silver.  Reserves were calculated using a variable economic cut-off grade of between US $5.10 and US $6.50/tonne (including a low grade stockpile of 130 million tonnes to be milled at the end of the mine life).  A marginal cut-off grade of US $2.92/tonne was used for the low-grade stockpile.  The recoverable payable metal content contained in these reserves totals at least 9.4 billion pounds of copper, 1.37 million ounces of gold, 24.1 million ounces of silver and 131.1 million pounds of molybdenum, not including the contained metal in the low grade stockpile.

Metallurgy

The Final Study estimates average recoveries of 90% for copper, 58% for gold and 62% for molybdenite.

Operating Plan

The Final Study examines development of the Petaquilla, Botija and Valle Grande deposits as an open pit operation to produce copper, gold and molybdenum flotation concentrates, based on estimated measured and indicated diluted mineable reserves of 1.115 billion tonnes grading 0.50% Cu, 0.09 g/t Au, 0.155 MoS2 as well as recoverable silver using a variable economic cut-off grade of between US $5.10 and US $6.50/tonne (including a low grade stockpile of 130 million tonnes to be milled at the end of the mine life) for a mine life of 23 years at a throughput rate of 120,000 tonnes per day or a mine life of 29 years at a throughput rate of 90,000 tonnes per day.  Average recoveries are estimated to be 90% for copper, 58% for gold and 62% for molybdenite.  At this rate, an average 419 million recoverable pounds of copper, 61,000 recoverable ounces of gold, and 5.8 million recoverable pounds of molybdenite would be produced annually.



---

-47-





The Final Study's conclusions include the following key projected financial assumptions for operations based on the base case mineable reserve estimate.  The initial capital cost of placing the three deposits into production is estimated at US $1.12 billion, while ongoing capital costs are estimated to total US $372 million.

The Final Study also examined an alternate case which includes an additional 356 million tonnes of preliminary scoping level mineable reserves at Valle Grande, the Molejon gold deposit and third party power supply options for Petaquilla as an alternate case and did not include production from Molejon gold deposit or the additional preliminary scoping level mineable reserves at Valle Grande in its base case analysis.

Status of Project Financing

Under the Petaquilla Shareholders Agreement, Teck Cominco Limited may acquire 50% of our interest in Minera Petaquilla, S.A. (indirectly acquiring a 26% interest in the Petaquilla Property) by, among other things, funding all of our costs of placing the Petaquilla Property into production and all subsequent costs, or 52% of the total costs thereof.  The terms of these arrangements are described in detail under the heading "Title" above.  In the event that Teck Cominco Limited does not acquire an interest in the Petaquilla Property, we intend to finance our 52% share of the costs of placing the Petaquilla Property into production through equity financing and/or copper or gold loans.  There can be no assurance, however, that we will be able to obtain required financing either on acceptable terms or at all.

Please refer to Title for information on the Ley Petaquilla Copper Deposit financing and related work.

Doing Business in Panama

The following briefly summarizes our understanding of the economic and political climate in Panama based on research and information compiled by us from various sources which we believe to be reliable:

Democracy was restored in Panama in December 1989 following the invasion of Panama by the U.S. military.  In May 1994, Panama held its first democratic elections in almost 30 years, resulting in the election of Partido Revolucionario Democratico ("PRD") candidate, Dr. Ernesto Perez Balladares, as President of the Republic.  The next election was held in May 1999 and resulted in Mireya Moscoso, leader of the Arnulfista Party, becoming President of the Republic.

In the elections held May 2, 2004, Martin Torrijos won a clear victory as President gaining 47% of the votes and outdistancing his closest rival with 31%. President-elect Torrijos' party,  PRD, also performed strongly in legislative and local races held the same day.  Unlike the previous administration, President-elect Torrijos' party will hold a majority of Senate seats.

Martin Torrijos is the son of a famous Panamanian leader, General Omar Torrijos, who ruled from 1968 until he died in a plane crash in 1981.  General Torrijos won Panama control over the Panama canal from the United States and instituted land reform and populist social and economic developments. General Torrijos supported the development of a modern mining sector and had close links in the Province of Cocle in the area of the Petaquilla property. The General championed numerous social development initiatives in the area of Petaquilla including the founding of the village of Coclesito near the property.

President Martin Torrijos campaigned on a platform of zero corruption, social development and economic (and job) expansion.  In his mid-forties and with the backing of Ruben Blades, a popular musician, he is generally expected to lead a youthful and vigorous administration.  He stands on an agenda that includes strengthening democracy and free trade talks with the United States.



---

-48-





At present, the expansion of the Panama Canal is subject to a national referendum which must be held by 2012 and a final decision has not been made by the Panama Canal Authority regarding such expansion.

We note that the comparative country risk rating for Panama by The Economist Intelligence Unit is in the mid-range, both globally and regionally, as follows:

|           | Country risk rating
(A=least risky, E=most risky) | Country risk score
(100=most risky)                     
|---------- | ------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------
|Argentina  | C                                                 | 55                                                      
|Bolivia    | D                                                 | 61                                                      
|Brazil     | C                                                 | 45                                                      
|Chile      | B                                                 | 24                                                      
|Columbia   | C                                                 | 44                                                      
|Costa Rica | C                                                 | 44                                                      
|Ecuador    | D                                                 | 66                                                      
|Guatemala  | C                                                 | 57                                                      
|Honduras   | C                                                 | 57                                                      
|Mexico     | C                                                 | 43                                                      
|Peru       | C                                                 | 43                                                      
|Panama     | C                                                 | 47                                                      
|Venezuela  | D                                                 | 61                                                      
|           |                                                   |                                                         
|           |                                                   | Source: The Economist Intelligence Unit April 2006 issue

Mining has not historically been a significant factor in the Panamanian economy and, consequently, Panama does not have the infrastructure and trained personnel required for modern mining operations. The government of Panama has, however, included the development of mineral resources in its economic plan to diversify the Panamanian economy and has taken steps to put in place the legislative framework needed to foster development of these resources.

The Code of Mineral Resources of the Republic of Panama has been subject to substantial modifications, among which the most important are Law No. 3 of January 28, 1988, and Law No. 32 of February 9, 1996.  The main purpose of such amendments was to simplify the procedure for filing the necessary petitions to obtain concessions, either for conducting mining exploration or mining extraction operations and property rights over the minerals extracted.  These amendments grant total exemption for import taxes and customs duties for all equipment, spare parts and materials used in the development of any type of mining operations and there are no export taxes on mineral production.

An exploration concession permits the holder to explore for the minerals specified in the concession.  The rental rates payable by the holder to the Government of Panama are US $0.50 per hectare for the first 2 years, US $1.00 per hectare for the third and fourth years, and US $1.50 for the fifth year and thereon. A 2% gross overriding royalty on the value received for all minerals of higher commercial value, i.e. gold and silver, mined from the concession is payable to the Government of Panama.

The holder of an exploration concession has the exclusive right to obtain an exploitation concession for the subject area upon determining that the minerals covered by the concession may be produced in commercial quantities through a separate request to the Government of Panama.  Rental rates for exploitation concessions fluctuate, depending on the mineral concerned and the extraction period, between US $0.75 and US $4.00 per hectare.  Rental rates for metallic minerals like copper, iron, zinc, aluminum and precious metals like gold and silver, are US $1.00 per hectare for the first 5 years, US $2.00 from the sixth to the tenth year, and US $3.00 the eleventh year and thereon.  A 2% gross overriding royalty on the value received for all minerals mined from the concession is payable to the Government of Panama. However, this overriding royalty will be 4% for minerals of higher commercial value like gold and silver.



---

-49-





Exploitation concessions generally permit the holder to carry out additional pre-development exploration, to construct all necessary production facilities and to extract, process, store, transport, market and export the minerals subject to the concession so long as production is ongoing.

In 1995, the Panamanian Tax Reform Law was enacted to simplify the corporate income tax rates applicable to income earned in Panama (Law No. 28 of June 20, 1995).  Since June 1995, the corporate income tax rate is 30%.  In addition to corporate income tax, Panamanian law provides for a dividend tax.  With the exceptions provided for in the Fiscal Code of the Republic of Panama, all corporations must retain 10% of the amounts they may distribute among their shareholders as dividends or share quotas.  In case dividends are not distributed, or the entire amount distributed as dividend or share quota is less than 40% of the net profit of that fiscal period, minus taxes paid by the corporation, the corporation must cover 10% of the remainder.

The Fiscal Code of the Republic of Panama indicates certain expenses which may be deducted from the income tax, applicable to companies conducting mining activities.  Additionally, the Code of Mineral Resources establishes certain expenses related to said activities that may be deducted from income tax as well.

There are currently no significant restrictions on repatriation from Panama of earnings to foreign entities other than the income tax and the dividends tax referred to above.  There are currently no currency exchange or foreign investment restrictions of material significance.

Based on our understanding of current Panamanian environmental laws and regulations, we do not anticipate that such laws will have any adverse material impact on any operations it may conduct in the future.

The foregoing laws of general application apply to our Panamanian mineral properties other than the Petaquilla Property which is governed primarily by the Ley Petaquilla.  See "Item 4 -  Information on Our Company - B. Business Overview".

Panama's currency, the Balboa, is at parity with the U.S. dollar.  Exchange transactions are allowed in U.S. dollars and, as a result, foreign currency fluctuations will only be material for us to the extent that fluctuations between the Canadian and U.S. dollar are material.

ITEM 5.  OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS

A.  Operating Results

We are in the business of the acquisition and exploration of mineral properties, with the primary aim of developing them to a stage where they can be exploited at a profit.  At that stage, our operations would, to a significant extent, be dependent on the prevailing market prices for any of the minerals produced by such operations.  We do not currently have any producing properties and, with the exception of our Petaquilla Property which is the subject of a bankable final feasibility study, our current operations on our various properties are exploratory searches for mineable deposits of minerals.  We are hopeful the Molejon deposit development work will both expand the reserves and classify the reserves as proven mineral reserves.  However, there is no guarantee such results will be obtained.  During the fiscal year ended January 31, 2006, we were primarily engaged in the continued development of our Molejon Property in Panama.  As a result, our future mineral exploration and mining activities may be affected in varying degrees by Panama's political stability and government regulation, all of which are beyond our control .  See "Item 3 -  Key Information - D. Risk Factors".  During the fiscal year ended January 31, 2002, we recorded a write-down of $32,628,433 in respect of our Petaquilla Property as a result of depressed copper prices making development of the Petaquilla Property uneconomical at that time.



---

-50-





Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2006, Compared to Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2005

We did not generate revenue from operations during the years ended January 31, 2006, and 2005.  Expenses for the year ended January 31, 2006, were $2,538,350, a substantial increase from $1,890,679 for the year ended January 31, 2005. The increase in expenses is primarily a response to our renewed interest in copper properties such as our Ley Petaquilla concession.  During the year, we commenced operations on the Molejon gold deposit, which contributed to increases in general and administrative costs.  Our largest cash outflow in the year ended January 31, 2006, was capitalized expenditures relating to our mineral properties of $2,197,611, as compared to $234,664 (expensed) in the prior year.  Stock-based compensation, a non-cash expense, decreased to $410,301 compared to $716,876 in the prior year, as a result of option grants during the year that have been deferred.

During the year ended January 31, 2006, we recorded a foreign exchange loss of $77,647 and interest income of $48,239. During the year ended January 31, 2005, we recorded interest income of $18,266, a gain on redemption of performance bond of $198,142, a write-down of property and equipment of $44,855 and an exchange loss of $79,147. In April 2004, we agreed with Madison Enterprises Corporation (Madison), a company formerly related by virtue of common directors, to transfer certain office equipment with a net book value of $42,705 to Madison in exchange for Madison indemnifying us for lease costs of approximately $62,000 per year for four years for its former premises.

The net loss for the year ended January 31, 2006, was $2,567,758 or $0.05 per share (2005  loss of  $1,798,273 or $0.04 per share; 2004  loss of $811,190 or $0.02 per share).

Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2005, Compared to Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2004

We did not generate revenue from operations during the years ended January 31, 2005, and 2004.

Expenses for the year ended January 31, 2005, were $1,890,679, a substantial increase from $726,887 for the year ended January 31, 2004. The increase in expenses are primarily a response by our company to improving copper prices, which have caused renewed interest in copper properties such as our Petaquilla property. During the latter part of the previous fiscal year, we resumed paying certain executive salaries and raised additional capital, which contributed to increases in accounting and legal, consulting fees, filing fees, office administration, rent, stock-based compensation, travel, and wages and benefits.  Our largest cash outflow in the year ended January 31, 2005, other than the increase in the performance bond, was a result of general and administrative expenses of $1,890,679. Stock-based compensation, a non-cash expense, increased to $716,876 compared to $242,469 in the prior year, as a result of option grants during the year and our company's adoption of fair value based accounting for all stock based compensation. Expenditures relating to resource properties during the year were $234,664, as compared to $33,910 in the prior year, due to a resumption of activity on the Molejon property during the year. We also received net proceeds of $424,200 from the issuance of capital stock compared to $2,043,947 in the previous year.   During the year ended January 31, 2004, our largest cash outflow was a result of general and administrative expenses of $726,887.

During the year ended January 31, 2005, we recorded a foreign exchange loss of $79,147, a gain on redemption of our performance bond of $198,142, a write-down of property and equipment of $44,855, and interest income of $18,266. During the year ended January 31, 2004, we recorded interest income of $57,964, and an exchange loss of $142,267. In April 2004, we agreed with Madison Enterprises Corporation ("Madison"), a company formerly related by virtue of common directors, to transfer certain office equipment with a net book value of $42,705 to Madison in exchange for Madison indemnifying our company for lease costs of approximately $62,000 per year for four years for our former premises.



---

-51-





The net loss for the year ended January 31, 2005 was $1,798,273 or $0.04 per share as compared with a net loss for the year ended January 31, 2004 of $811,190 or $0.02 per share.

Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2004, Compared to Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2003

During the fiscal year ended January 31, 2004, we recorded interest income of $57,964, and a foreign exchange loss of $142,267.  During the fiscal year ended January 31, 2003, we recorded interest income of $71,363, a foreign exchange loss of $43,482 and a write-down of marketable securities of $11,685.

General and administrative expenses for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2004, were $726,887, up substantially from $230,298 for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2003.  The increase in expenses are primarily a response by us to improving copper prices, which have caused renewed interest in copper properties such as our Petaquilla Property. During the year, we resumed paying certain executive salaries and raised additional capital, which contributed to increases in accounting and legal, consulting fees, filing fees, office administration, rent, stock-based compensation, travel, and wages and benefits.

Accounting and legal increased to $98,850 in the fiscal year 2004 from $35,089 in the prior year, as a result of a series of equity financings and a review of our property holdings in Panama. Consulting fees increased to $40,834 from $Nil primarily as a result of the addition of a CFO, who is paid on a consulting basis, and additional fees paid to consultants. Filing fees increased to $ 68,923 from $20,661 primarily as a result of the equity financings. Investor relations and shareholder information expenses increased to $28,941 from $15,463 primarily as a result of shareholders mailings required as a term of the equity financings. Stock-based compensation increased to $242,469, compared to $48,290 in the prior year, as a result of additional option grants during the year and our adoption of fair value based accounting for all stock based compensation.

The net loss for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2004, was $811,190 or $0.02 per share as compared with a net loss for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2003, of $214,102 or $0.01 per share.  We expect to incur a net operating loss for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2005.

B.  Liquidity and Capital Resources

In our management's view, given the nature of our activities, which consist of the acquisition, exploration, exploration management, development, and sale of mineral properties, the most meaningful and material financial information concerning us relates to our current liquidity and capital resources.  We do not currently own or have an interest in any mineral producing properties and have not derived any revenues from the sale of gold, copper or other materials in the last three financial years.  Our principal property, the Petaquilla Property, is located in Panama, and as a result our operations on the property may be subject to additional risks, which are more fully described in "Item 3 - Key Information - D. Risk Factors".

Our mineral exploration activities have been funded through sales of common shares and we expect that we will continue to be able to utilize this source of financing until we develop cash flow from our operations.  There can be no assurance, however, that we will be able to obtain required financing in the future on acceptable terms, or at all.  See "Item 4 - Information on Our Company - D. Property, Plant and Equipment" above.  Based on our existing working capital, we expect to require additional financing for our currently held properties during the upcoming fiscal year.  Accordingly, there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.  We have not carried out debt financing nor have we made use of any financial instruments for hedging purposes.  We had no material commitments for capital expenditures at the end of our most recent fiscal year.



---

-52-





Mineral properties and marketable securities that were written down in the years ended January 31, 2002, and January 31, 2001, were written down when we decided there was little or no possibility of recovery from these properties. All expenses incurred during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2005, that were associated with our mineral properties were expensed during the period.  Our Management reviews annually the carrying value of our interest in each mineral property and where necessary, properties are written down to the estimated recoverable amount determined on a non-discounted basis after giving effect to any property option agreements and cost recovery agreements.  Costs relating to properties abandoned are written off when the decision to abandon is made.

At January 31, 2006, we had working capital of $8,689,060 (January 31, 2005 - $870,543). We recently raised funds from a private placement but will have to raise additional funds to meet our planned corporate and administrative expenses for the coming year and to undertake ongoing development and further exploration of the Molejon gold deposit.  Management is pursuing additional sources of financing and while it has been successful in the past there can be no assurance that it will be able to do so in the future. Accordingly, there is substantial doubt about the ability of PTQ to continue as a going concern.

Other than as discussed herein, we are not aware of any trends, demands, commitments, events or uncertainties that may result in our liquidity either materially increasing or decreasing at present or in the foreseeable future.  Material increases or decreases in our liquidity will be substantially determined by the timing of any production decision on our Petaquilla Property which, in turn, will be substantially determined by the price of copper.

January 31, 2006, Compared to January 31, 2005

At January 31, 2006, our current assets totaled $9,240,156 compared to $973,594 at January 31, 2005.  The increase is primarily attributable to cash acquired from issuance of capital stock less general and administrative expenses incurred during the period.

At January 31, 2006, total liabilities were significantly higher at $551,096 compared to $103,051 as at January 31, 2005.

Working capital was $8,689,060 at January 31, 2006, as compared with working capital of $870,543 at January 31, 2005.  As at January 31, 2006, and January 31, 2005, we had no long-term debt.

At January 31, 2006, we had total assets of $12,807,172 as compared with $1,989,474 at January 31, 2005.  The increase is primarily a result of cash acquired from issuance of capital stock and mineral property costs less general and administrative expenses during the year.

Share capital as at January 31, 2006, and 2005 was $70,246,303 and $51,264,537, respectively.

Our largest cash outflows in the fiscal years ended January 31, 2006, and 2005 were due to general and administrative expenses of $2,538,350 and $1,890,679, respectively.

The most significant contribution to working capital in the year ended January 31, 2006, was the issuance of capital stock upon the exercise of stock options and warrants, which provided net proceeds of $2,358,942 and the equity financing provided proceeds of $8,933,334. The most significant contribution to working capital in the year ended January 31, 2005, was the issuance of capital stock upon the exercise of stock options and warrants.



---

-53-





In January 2006, we completed a non-brokered private placement and issued 9,965,670 units at a  price of $0.95 per unit, for gross proceeds of $9,467,387.  Each unit consists of one common share and one-half of one non-transferable share purchase warrant aggregating 4,982,835 warrants. Each whole warrant entitles the holder to purchase one common share of the Company at a price of $1.20 per share if exercised in the first year following the closing, and at a price of $1.44 per share if exercised in the second year following the closing.  The warrant will terminate within 20 days unless exercised in the event the Companys closing stock price meets or exceeds $2.00 for 10 consecutive trading days and the Company issues a press release of such an event. We paid finders fees of $534,053 for net proceeds of $8,933,334.

January 31, 2005, Compared to January 31, 2004

At January 31, 2005, our current assets totaled $973,594 compared to $1,934,090 at January 31, 2004.  The decrease is primarily attributable to general and administrative expenses incurred during the period.

At January 31, 2005, total liabilities were relatively constant at $103,051 compared to $126,941 as at January 31, 2004.

Working capital was $870,543 at January 31, 2005 as compared with working capital of $1,807,149 at January 31, 2004.  As at January 31, 2005, and January 31, 2004, we had no long-term debt.

At January 31, 2005, we had total assets of $1,989,474 as compared with $2,670,561 at January 31, 2004.  The decrease is primarily attributable to general and administrative expenses incurred during the period.

Share capital as at January 31, 2005 and 2004 was $51,430,792 and $50,849,326, respectively.

Our largest cash outflows in the fiscal years ended January 31, 2005 and 2004 were due to general and administrative expenses of $1,890,679 and $726,887, respectively.

The most significant contribution to working capital in the year ended January 31, 2005 was the issuance of capital stock upon the exercise of stock options and warrants, which provided net proceeds of $424,200. The most significant contribution to working capital in the year ended January 31, 2004 was the equity financing, which provided net proceeds of $2,043,947.

January 31, 2004, Compared to January 31, 2003

At January 31, 2004, our current assets totaled $1,934,090 compared to $271,542 at January 31, 2003.  The increase is primarily attributable to equity financing raised during the period.

At January 31, 2004, total liabilities were relatively constant at $ 126,941 compared to $128,246 as at January 31, 2003.

Working capital was $1,807,149 at January 31, 2003, as compared with working capital of $143,296 at January 31, 2003.  As at January 31, 2004, and January 31, 2003, we had no long-term debt.

At January 31, 2004, we had total assets of $2,670,561 as compared with $1,196,640 at January 31, 2003.  This increase is due to equity financing raised by Petaquilla Minerals.

Share capital as at January 31, 2004, and 2003 was $50,849,326 and $48,842,442, respectively.

Our largest cash outflows in the fiscal years ended January 31, 2004, and 2003 were due to general and administrative expenses of $726,887 and $230,298, respectively.



---

-54-





The most significant contribution to working capital in the year ended January 31, 2004, was the equity financing, which provided net proceeds of $2,043,947. The most significant contribution to working capital in the year ended January 31, 2003 was provided by interest income of $71,363.

In September 2003, we completed a non-brokered private placement and issued 8,333,333 units at a price of $0.15 per unit, for gross proceeds of $1,250,000. Each unit consists of one common share and one-half non-transferable share purchase warrant. Each whole warrant entitles the holder to purchase one additional common share of Petaquilla Minerals at a price of $0.25 per share until September 24, 2005. We paid finder's fees of $125,000 and issued 300,000 as finder's fee warrants entitling the holder to purchase one additional common share at a price of $0.25 per share until September 24, 2005.

In November 2003, we completed a non-brokered private placement and issued 6,666,666 units at a price of $0.15 per unit, for gross proceeds of $1,000,000. Each unit consists of one common share and one-half non-transferable share purchase warrant. Each whole warrant entitles the holder to purchase one additional common share of PTQ at a price of $0.25 per share until November 18, 2005. We paid finder's fees of $100,000.

Material Differences between Canadian and U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles

We prepare our financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in Canada ("Canadian GAAP") which differ in certain respects from those principles that we would have followed had our financial statements been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ("U.S. GAAP"). The significant measurement differences between Canadian and U.S. GAAP, which affect our financial statements, are described below:

Under U.S. GAAP, deferred exploration costs are written off as incurred.  Had we presented our financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, our losses would have increased in the fiscal year ended January 31, 2006 by $2,389,769.  They would have neither increased nor decreased for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2005, and 2004 and they would have increased by $127,800 for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2003, over that for 2002.

Under Canadian GAAP, the marketable securities held by us are recorded at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Under U.S. GAAP, the investments are classified as "available-for-sale" securities and recorded at market value. The accumulated difference between cost and market value is recorded as part of comprehensive income.

Outlook

For the remainder of the fiscal year ending January 31, 2006, our activities will focus on the development of the Petaquilla Property.  Based on our existing working capital, we expect to require additional financing during the upcoming fiscal year.  We had no material commitments for capital expenditures at the end of our most recent fiscal year.

C.  Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, etc.

As we are an exploration company with no producing properties, the information required by this section is inapplicable.



---

-55-





D.  Trend Information

As we are an exploration company with no producing properties, the information required by this section is inapplicable.

E.  Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements required to be disclosed in this Annual Report on Form 20-F.

F.  Disclosure of Contractual Obligations

With respect to contractual obligations, we have one commitment relating to our leasehold obligation for our office premises, totaling $305,560 over five years ($61,112 per year).

ITEM 6.  DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES

A.  Directors and Senior Management

The following information is about our directors and members of senior management, including names, business experience, offices held and principal business activities performed outside our company.

John Cook

Mr. Cook was appointed a director of our company on February 15, 2006.  Based in Sydney, Australia, he is an Equity Consultant with over 40 years of experience as an institutional and high net worth adviser, specializing in raising capital for mining companies.  He has held directorship positions for Inform Energy and Renewal Energy Company.

John S. Watt

Mr. Watt was appointed Chief Financial Officer of our company on March 1, 2006.  Mr. Watt, a Chartered Accountant (CA), has a background in financial management of mineral resource property development and an in-depth knowledge of corporate governance requirements.  Mr. Watts experience includes consulting services on the compliance for Sarbanes-Oxley Act controls and procedures as well as senior financial management to resource-based companies.

Kenneth Morgan

Mr. Morgan is a Chartered Accountant (CA) and a Certified Public Accountant (CPA) and has been a director since September 25, 2003.  He also served as our Chief Financial Officer for the period September 25, 2003, until February 26, 2006, and as our Secretary for the period December 13, 2004, until January 18, 2006.  Since July 2001, he has been President, Chief Executive Officer, and a director of Strategem Capital Corporation, a company that owns approximately 9.265% (as of May 3, 2006) of our outstanding shares.  From September 1999 to March 2001, he was the Chief Financial Officer of Image Power Inc.  He was previously a public accountant with the firm of Grant Thornton Chartered Accountants and is a member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of BC and of the Washington State Board of Accountancy.  He holds a Bachelor of Commerce degree from the University of British Columbia.



---

-56-





Marco Tejeira

Mr. Tejeira was appointed a director of our company on April 25, 2005.  Mr. Tejeira is a Panamanian citizen residing in Panama, where he graduated in law from the University of Santa Maria La Antigua.  He is  a legal practitioner and senior partner in the Panamanian law firm of Grimaldo and Tejeira.  He has extensive commercial experience in the Americas.

Michael Levy

Mr. Levy was appointed a director on April 16, 2004, and as our President on December 13, 2004. He has been the Executive Vice-President of Custom House Global Foreign Exchange since 2000 and prior to that operated his own currency exchange company within the Lower Fraser Valley area of British Columbia.  He is also the founder, President, and Managing Director of Border Gold Corp.  Since 1989, Mr. Levy has also been a Financial Analyst on InvestorSpot TV and CKNW/98 Radio on the Corus Radio Network.  He regularly presents seminars to brokerages and financial institutions, business organizations, companies involved in cross-border trade, and precious metal investors, and he appears as guest host on the syndicated radio talk show, MoneyTalks.

Richard Fifer

Mr. Fifer is a Panamanian citizen and a U.S-trained geologist.  He has been a director from March 1993 to November 1998, July 2002 to July 2003, and from November 12, 2003, to the present.  In addition, he acted as our Chief Executive Officer from December 14, 2004, to March 23, 2005.  Since 1994, he has been President of Geoinfo, S.A., a Panamanian company that provides GIS (mapping) technology and solutions.  He was Chairman and President of CODEMIN (the Panama state mining company) from January 1997 to January 2000.  Under the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Panama, he was the President's Plenipotentiary Ambassador-at-large from March 2002 to September 2003.  He was also Governor of the Province of Cocle, Panama, from March 2002 to September 2003.  Mr. Fifer has a B.Sc. in Geological engineering and a M.A. in Finance from Tulane University.

B.

Compensation

During the fiscal year ended January 31, 2006, we paid cash compensation to our directors and officers as provided for herein. No other funds were set aside or accrued by us during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2006, to provide pension, retirement or similar benefits for our directors or officers pursuant to any existing plan provided or contributed to by us or our subsidiaries under applicable Canadian laws.

We are required, under applicable securities legislation in Canada to disclose to our shareholders details of compensation paid to our executive officers.  The following fairly reflects all material information regarding compensation paid to our executive officers which has been disclosed to our shareholders under applicable Canadian law.

Cash and Non-Cash Compensation - Executive Officers and Directors

Effective February 1, 2005, we had three executive officers being Kenneth W. Morgan as Chief Financial Officer and Secretary, Michael Levy as President, and Richard Fifer as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.  Richard Fifer acted as our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer from December 13, 2004, to March 23, 2005.  Kenneth W. Morgan acted as our Secretary until January 18, 2006, and as our Chief Financial Officer until February 26, 2006.  We currently have three executive officers being (a) Michael Levy, who was appointed as President on December 13, 2004, (b) Graham Scott, Corporate Secretary, who was appointed as Corporate Secretary on January 18, 2006, and (c) John S. Watt, who was appointed as Chief Financial Officer on March 1, 2006.



---

-57-





The following table sets forth all annual and long term compensation for services provided to us during the fiscal years ended January 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004 in respect of the individuals who were, at January 31, 2006, our executive officers:

Summary Compensation Table

|Annual Compensation         | Long Term Compensation
|--------------------------- | ----------------------
|                            |                       
|                            | Awards                
|                            |                       
|Name and Principal Position | Year                  
|                            |                       
|Michael Levy
President      | 2006
2005
2004        
|                            |                       
|Kenneth Morgan
CFO          | 2006
2005
2004        

Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year

The following table sets forth stock options granted by us during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2006, to our executive officers:

|Name             | Securities Under Options Granted
(#)(1) | % of Total Options
Granted in
Fiscal Year(2) | Exercise or
Base Price
($/Security)(3) | Market Value of Securities Underlying Options on Date of Grant
($/Security) | Expiration Date              
|---------------- | --------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------
|Richard Fifer(4) | 600,000(5)
175,000(5)                   | 10.77%
3.14%                                 | $0.50
$0.385                           | Nil
Nil                                                                     | July 11, 2010
August 23, 2010
|                 |                                         |                                              |                                        |                                                                             |                              
|Michael Levy     | 600,000                                 | 10.77%                                       | $0.50                                  | Nil                                                                         | July 11, 2010                
|                 |                                         |                                              |                                        |                                                                             |                              
|Ken Morgan       | 600,000
288,000                         | 10.77%
5.17%                                 | $0.50
$0.385                           | Nil
Nil                                                                     | July 11, 2010
August 23, 2010

(1)   These options are subject to regulatory and shareholder approval.

(2)  Percentage of all options granted during the fiscal year.



---

-58-





(3)  The exercise price of stock options is set at not less than 100% of the market value (as defined in the Stock Option Plan referred to below) of our common shares on the date of grant.  The exercise price of stock options may only be adjusted in the event that specified events cause dilution of our share capital.  The stock options bearing an expiry date of July 11, 2010, vest over a period of 18 months.  The stock options bearing an expiry date of August 23, 2010, vested immediately upon the date of grant being August 23, 2005.

(4)

Mr. Fifer ceased to be an officer of the company on March 23, 2005.

(5)

Stock options granted after Mr. Fifer ceased to be an officer of the company.

Aggregated Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and Fiscal Year-End Option Values

The following table sets forth details of all exercises of stock options during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2006, by our executive officers and the fiscal year-end value of unexercised options on an aggregated basis:

|Name              | Securities Acquired on Exercise
(#)(1) | Aggregate Value Realized
($)(2) | Unexercised Options at Fiscal Year-End
(#)(3), (4)Exercisable/
Unexercisable | Value of Unexercised In-the-Money Options at Fiscal Year-End
($)(3), (4)Exercisable/
Unexercisable
|----------------- | -------------------------------------- | ------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                  |                                        |                                 |                                                                              |                                                                                                   
|Richard Fifer (5) | 171,800                                | $41,232                         | 33,200                                                                       | $26,892                                                                                           
|                  |                                        |                                 | 170,000                                                                      | $105,400                                                                                          
|                  |                                        |                                 | 600,000                                                                      | $324,000                                                                                          
|                  |                                        |                                 | 175,000                                                                      | $114,625                                                                                          
|                  |                                        |                                 |                                                                              |                                                                                                   
|Michael Levy      | 250,000                                | $173,400                        | 200,000                                                                      | $124,000                                                                                          
|                  |                                        |                                 | 600,000                                                                      | $324,000                                                                                          
|                  |                                        |                                 |                                                                              |                                                                                                   
|Kenneth W. Morgan | 440,800                                | $166,092                        | 9,200                                                                        | $7,452                                                                                            
|                  |                                        |                                 | 600,000                                                                      | $324,000                                                                                          
|                  |                                        |                                 | 288,000                                                                      | $188,640                                                                                          

(1)  Number of our common shares acquired on the exercise of stock options.

(2)  Calculated using the closing price of our common shares on the date of exercise less the exercise price of the stock options.

(3)  The figures relate solely to stock options.

(4)  Value of unexercised in-the-money options calculated using the closing price of our common shares on the TSX on January 31, 2006, which was $1.04, less the exercise price of in-the-money stock options.

(5)  Mr. Fifer ceased to be an officer of the company on March 23, 2005.

Defined Benefit or Actuarial Plan Disclosure

We do not provide retirement benefits for directors and executive officers.



---

-59-





Termination of Employment, Change in Responsibilities and Employment Contracts

We have not entered into any formal employment agreements with our executive officers.

Directors

We have no arrangements, standard or otherwise, pursuant to which directors are compensated by us or our subsidiaries for their services in their capacity as directors, or for committee participation, or involvement in special assignments during the most recently completed financial year or subsequently up to and including the date of this Annual Report, except that directors are compensated for their actual expenses incurred in the pursuance of their duties as directors and certain directors may be compensated for services rendered as consultants or experts.

The following table sets forth stock options granted by us during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2006, to our directors who are not also our executive officers:

|Name           | Securities Under Options Granted
(#)(1) | % of Total Options
Granted in
Fiscal Year(2) | Exercise or
Base Price
($/Security)(3) | Market Value of Securities Underlying Options on Date of Grant
($/Security) | Expiration Date
|-------------- | --------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------
|               |                                         |                                              |                                        |                                                                             |                
|Marco Tejeira  | 225,000                                 | 4.04%                                        | $0.50                                  | Nil                                                                         | April 21, 2010 
|               | 400,000                                 | 7.18%                                        | $0.50                                  | Nil                                                                         | July 11, 2010  
|               |                                         |                                              |                                        |                                                                             |                
|John Purkis(4) | 100,000                                 | 1.79%                                        | $0.50                                  | Nil                                                                         | April 21, 2010 
|               | 300,000                                 | 5.38%                                        | $0.50                                  | Nil                                                                         | July 11, 2010  

Percentage of all options granted during the fiscal year.

The exercise price of stock options is set at not less than 100% of the market value (as defined in the Stock Option Plan referred to below) of our common shares on the date of grant.  The exercise price of stock options may only be adjusted in the event that specified events cause dilution of our share capital.  Options vest immediately upon grant.

(1)

These options are subject to regulatory and shareholder approval.

(2)

Percentage of all options granted during the fiscal year.

(3)

The exercise price of stock options is set at not less than 100% of the market value (as defined in the Stock Option Plan referred to below) of our common shares on the date of grant.  The exercise price of stock options may only be adjusted in the event that specified events cause dilution of our share capital.  Options vest immediately upon grant.

(4)

John Purkis was appointed as a director of our company on July 5, 2005, and resigned on December 15, 2005.



---

-60-





The following table sets forth details of all exercises of stock options during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2006, by our directors who are not also our executive officers, and the fiscal year-end value of unexercised options on an aggregate basis:

|Name           | Securities Acquired on Exercise
(#)(1) | Aggregate Value Realized
($)(2) | Unexercised Options at Fiscal Year-End
(#)(3), (4)Exercisable/
Unexercisable | Value of Unexercised In-the-Money Options at Fiscal Year-End
($)(3), (4)Exercisable/
Unexercisable
|-------------- | -------------------------------------- | ------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|               |                                        |                                 |                                                                              |                                                                                                   
|Marco Tejeira  | nil                                    | nil                             | 225,000                                                                      | $121,500                                                                                          
|               |                                        |                                 | 400,000                                                                      | $216,000                                                                                          
|               |                                        |                                 |                                                                              |                                                                                                   
|John Purkis(5) | nil                                    | nil                             | 100,000                                                                      | $54,000                                                                                           
|               |                                        |                                 | 300,000                                                                      | $162,000                                                                                          

(1)  Number of our common shares acquired on the exercise of stock options.

(2)  Calculated using the closing prices on the exercise date for a board lot of our common shares on the TSX.

(3)  The figures relate solely to stock options.

(4)  The closing price of our common shares on the TSX on January 31, 2006, was $1.04.

(5)  John Purkis was appointed as a director of our company on July 5, 2005, and resigned on December 13, 2005.

C.  Board Practices

The directors hold office for a term of one year or until our next annual general meeting, at which time all directors retire, and are eligible for re-election.  We nor any of our subsidiaries have any arrangement to provide benefits to our directors upon termination of employment.

For the period December 7, 2004, to June 28, 2005, our audit committee was comprised of Patrick Downey, Richard Fifer, and Michael Levy.    Following Patrick Downeys resignation on April 1, 2005, the audit committee consisted of Richard Fifer and Michael Levy.

For the period June 28, 2005, to September 13, 2005, our audit committee was comprised of Kenneth W. Morgan, Richard Fifer and Marco Tejeira with Kenneth W. Morgan appointed as Chairman of the Companys Audit Committee.  On September 13, 2005, John Purkis replaced Richard Fifer as a member of the Audit Committee and remained a member of the committee until his resignation on December 13, 2005.

On March 7, 2006, the members of the Audit Committee became John Cook, Marco Tejeira, and Michael Levy.

Each is financially literate.  The audit committee is appointed by the board of directors and its members hold office until removed by the board of directors or until our next annual general meeting, at which time their appointments expire and they are then eligible for re-appointment.  The audit committee reviews our audited financial statements and liaises with our auditors and recommends to the board of directors whether or not to approve such statements.  At the request of our auditors, the audit committee must convene a meeting to consider any matters which the auditor believes should be brought to the attention of the board of directors or our shareholders.



---

-61-





In its current form our audit committee does not meet the requirements of certain provincial securities laws.  Part 3 of Multilateral Instrument 52-110  Audit Committees requires, among other things, that each member of our audit committee be "independent".  Currently, two of the three members are considered to be independent.  According to this instrument, an executive officer of a company who also serves as a member of a company's audit committee is not considered independent.  Michael Levy  acts as our President and, as such, our audit committee does not comply with Multilateral Instrument 52-110.  We plan to change the composition of our audit committee so that it complies with Multilateral Instrument 52-110.

The audit committee operates pursuant to a charter adopted by the board of directors. The audit committee is responsible primarily for monitoring: (i) the integrity of our financial statements; (ii) compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; and (iii) the independence and performance of our internal and external auditors.

Our Compensation Committee is composed of all of the members of the board of directors with Michael Levy acting as Chairman.

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is also composed of all of the members of the board of directors with Michael Levy acting as Chairman.

Our Disclosure Committee is composed of Kenneth W. Morgan and Michael Levy with Michael Levy acting as Chairman.

D.  Employees

During the fiscal years ended January 31, 2006, 2005, 2004, we had an average of five employees in our Vancouver head office.  Since December 2005, we have had five people working out of our head office, twelve people working out of our Panama City office, eight people working out of our office in La Pintada, Panama, and approximately 100 casual laborers and drilling helpers working at our base camp near the Molejon gold deposit.  From 2004 to 2006, of the average of the five employees who worked for our company at our head office, two worked in management roles, one in a secretarial role, one in an accounting role, and one in an investor relations position.

Consultants

In January 2005, we retained the services of David J. Nowak (P.Geo.) of Nowak and Associates,  Burnaby, British Columbia, to review the Molejon Geological model in preparation for the 5,000 meter drilling program on the property that commenced in January 2006.

In January 2005, we retained the services of Dr. Margaret Venable (PhD. Geo.) to supervise the mapping and trenching programs on the property and to conduct detailed analyses of the Molejon gold mineralogy.

In October 2005, we contracted SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc. to complete a database audit, resource estimate and an encompassing National Instrument 43-101 Technical Report to be used in support of an Issuer Disclosure of mineral resources.   The scope of the study was limited to the Molejon gold mineral agreement area which contains the Molejon gold mineral resources.

In January 2006, we retained the services of AquAeTer, Inc. to provide a Qualified Person, as defined by the Canadian Securities Administrators in National Instrument 43-101, to observe exploratory drilling at the Molejon Property.  Sean Muller, P.G., is the professional provided by AquAeTer, Inc. to provide these services.



---

-62-





E.  Share Ownership

The following table sets forth the share ownership of those persons listed in subsection 6.B above and includes the details of all options or warrants to purchase our shares held by such persons:

|Name           | Number of Common Shares
Held at
May 3, 2006 | Number of Common Shares Subject to Options or Warrants at
May 3, 2006(1) | Beneficial Percentage Ownership(2) | Exercise Price                       | Expiry Date                                                    
|-------------- | ------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ---------------------------------- | ------------------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|               |                                             |                                                                          |                                    |                                      |                                                                
|Kenneth Morgan | 9,200                                       | 600,000 options
288,000 options
175,000 options                          | 0.013%                             | $0.50
$0.385
$1.05                   | July 11, 2010
August 23, 2010
February 1, 2011                 
|               |                                             |                                                                          |                                    |                                      |                                                                
|Michael Levy   | 163,416                                     | 200,000 options
600,000 options
300,000 options
13,158 warrants          | 0.23%                              | $0.42
$0.50
$1.05
$1.20/(3)
$1.44(3) | April 28, 2009
July 11, 2010
February 1, 2011
December 20, 2007
|               |                                             |                                                                          |                                    |                                      |                                                                
|Richard Fifer  | 1,103,883                                   | 170,000 options
600,000 options
175,000 options
1,300,000 options        | 1.56%                              | $0.42
$0.50
$0.385
$1.05             | April 28, 2009
July 11, 2010
August 23, 2010
February 1, 2011  
|               |                                             |                                                                          |                                    |                                      |                                                                
|Marco Tejeira  | nil                                         | 225,000 options
400,000 options
150,000 options                          | n/a                                | $0.50
$0.50
$1.05                    | April 25, 2010
July 11, 2010
February 1, 2011                  
|               |                                             |                                                                          |                                    |                                      |                                                                
|John Purkis    | nil                                         | 100,000 options
300,000 options                                          | n/a                                | $0.50
$0.50                          | April 25, 2010
July 11, 2010                                   

(1)

These options are subject to regulatory and shareholder approval.  Subsequent to the year ended January 31, 2006, PTQ granted 2,930,000 stock options subject to regulatory and shareholder approval.

(2)

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.  In computing the number of shares owned by a person and the percentage ownership of that person, Common Shares subject to options and warrants held by that person that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of May 3, 2006, are deemed outstanding.  Such shares, however, are not deemed outstanding for the purposes of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.  This table has been prepared based on 70,709,153 common shares outstanding as of May 3, 2006.

(3)

One common share purchase warrant (two half warrants) entitles the holder thereof to purchase one share of common stock in the capital of the Company at a price of CDN$1.20 per share, if exercised on or before December 20, 2006, and at a price of CDN$1.44 per share if exercised after December 20, 2006, but before December 20, 2007.



---

-63-





On June 23, 1994, we adopted a stock option plan (the "Plan") which authorizes our board of directors to grant incentive stock options to our directors, officers and employees or our associated, affiliated, controlled or subsidiary companies, in accordance with the terms of the Plan and the rules and policies of the TSX Exchange.  Under the terms of the Plan, the aggregate number of our common shares reserved for issuance under the Plan at any time may not exceed 4,950,968 and the aggregate number of common shares reserved for issuance to any person may not exceed 5% of the number of outstanding common shares.  On July 24, 2002, our board of directors amended the Plan to increase the number of shares reserved for issuance thereunder from 4,950,968 to 7,436,158.

As at January 31, 2006, the maximum number of shares reserved for issuance under the Companys plan is 7,436,158 common shares of which 4,908,147 have been exercised, leaving 2,528,011 common shares available under the Plan.  The aggregate number of common shares reserved for issuance to any person may not exceed 5% of the number of outstanding common shares.  The exercise price of the options will be determined by the fair market value of the shares at the closing price on the date prior to date of the grant.  Options granted must be exercised no later than 10 years after the date of grant or such lesser period as may be determined by the Board.  The Board may at its discretion in any granting of an option set a vesting period whereby the option may only be exercisable in pre-determined instalments.

ITEM 7.  MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

A.  Major Shareholders

The following table sets forth the name of the only shareholder who, to the knowledge of our management, as at May 3, 2006, beneficially owns greater than 5% of any class of our voting securities:

|Name                             | Number of Common Shares Held at May 3, 2006 | Percentage of Common Shares Outstanding at May 3, 2006
|-------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|                                 |                                             |                                                       
|Strategem Capital Corporation(1) | 6,551,400                                   | 9.265%                                                

(1)  Kenneth W. Morgan is the President and Chief Executive Officer of Strategem Capital Corporation.

Our major shareholder does not have different voting rights.  To our knowledge, it is not controlled by another corporation, any foreign government or by any other natural or legal persons severally or jointly.

As at May 3, 2006, there were 70,709,153of our common shares issued and outstanding.  Based on the records of our registrar and transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company of 510 Burrard Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, as at such date there were 137registered holders of our common shares resident in the United States, holding an aggregate 9,177,695common shares, including 8,530,607 shares held by Cede & Co.  This number represents approximately 12.065% of our  total issued and outstanding common shares as at May 3, 2006.  Based on our estimates, as at May 3, 2006, there were approximately 1178beneficial holders of our common shares resident in the United States, holding an approximate aggregate 9,462,155common shares.  This number represents approximately 13.4% of our total issued and outstanding common shares as at May 3, 2006 and includes approximately 8,127,707 shares held by Cede & Co.  The total number of registered and beneficial holders of our common shares resident in the United States, therefore, is approximately 1,315 holders, approximately holding an aggregate 9,658,012 common shares. This number represents approximately 13.7% of our total issued and outstanding common shares as at May 3, 2006.

We do not know of any arrangements that may at subsequent date result in our change of control.



---

-64-





B.  Related Party Transactions

During the year ended January 31, 2006:



a)

The Company paid consulting fees of $114,559 (2005 - $96,780; 2004 - $34,833) to companies controlled by a director and a former director.



b)

The Company paid wages and benefits of $230,525 (2005 - $207,068; 2004 - $44,272) to directors and an officer.



c)

The Company paid rent expense of $Nil (2005 - $17,816; 2004 - $11,215) to a company controlled by a director and to a company related by virtue of former common directors.  The Company received $9,446 (2005 - $Nil; 2004 - $Nil) for rent charges from a company with a common director.



d)

The Company paid legal fees of $Nil (2005 - $21,433; 2004 - $108,037) to a law firm controlled by a former director, of which $Nil (2005 - $Nil; 2004 - $47,569) was recorded as share issue costs.



e)

The Company paid $61,749 (2005 - $Nil; 2004 - $Nil) for equipment and supplies to a company controlled by a director.



Included in accounts payable at January 31, 2006 is $1,241 (2005 - $36,458) due to directors, a former director, and to companies related by virtue of common directors.



These transactions are in the normal course of operations and are measured at the exchange amount, which is the amount of consideration established and agreed to by the related parties.

Other than the above transactions, there were no material transactions in the fiscal year ended January 31, 2006, or proposed material transactions between us or any of our subsidiaries and:

(a)

enterprises that directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, control or are controlled by, or are under common control with, Petaquilla Minerals;

(b)

associates;

(c)

individuals owning, directly or indirectly, an interest in the voting power of PTQthat gives them significant influence over us, and close members of any such individual's family;

(d)

key management personnel, that is, those persons having authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling our activities (or their wholly owned private companies), including directors and senior management of companies and close members of such individuals' families;

(e)

enterprises in which a substantial interest in the voting power is owned, directly or indirectly, by any person described in (c) or (d) or over which such a person is able to exercise significant influence including enterprises owned by our directors or major shareholders and enterprises that have a member of key management in common with Petaquilla Minerals.

None of our officers or directors, or any associate of such person, was indebted at any time during the fiscal years ended January 31, 2006, 2005 or 2004.



---

-65-





C.  Interests of Experts and Counsel

This Form 20F is being filed as an Annual Report under the Exchange Act and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this section.

ITEM 8.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION

A.  Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information

This Annual Report contains our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2006, which contains an Independent Auditor's Report dated April 3, 2006, Consolidated Balance Sheets as at January 31, 2006, and 2005, Consolidated Statements of Operations and Deficit for the Fiscal Years Ended January 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Fiscal Years Ended January 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 and Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

B.  Significant Changes

No significant change has occurred since the date of the annual financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F.

ITEM 9.  THE OFFER AND LISTING

A.  Offer and Listing Details

The high and low sale prices for our common shares on the Toronto Stock Exchange for each of the six months preceding May 3, 2006, each fiscal quarter in each of the last two full financial years and subsequent period and each of the last five full financial years are as follows:

|                                                     | High  | Low   
|---------------------------------------------------- | ----- | ------
|2006                                                 | $2.49 | $1.02 
|April                                                | $2.49 | $1.57 
|March                                                | $1.93 | $1.56 
|February                                             | $1.80 | $1.02 
|2005                                                 | $1.29 | $0.37 
|January                                              | $1.26 | $1.00 
|December                                             | $1.11 | $0.95 
|November                                             | $1.06 | $0.92 
|Fourth Quarter
(November 1, 2005  January 31, 2006) | $1.26 | $0.92 
|Third Quarter
(August 1, 2005  October 31, 2005)    | $1.29 | $0.38 
|Second Quarter
(May 1, 2005  July 31, 2005)         | $0.59 | $0.37 
|First Quarter
(February 1, 2005  April 30, 2005)    | $0.71 | $0.375
|2004                                                 | $0.73 | $0.34 
|Fourth Quarter
(November 1, 2004  January 31, 2005) | $0.73 | $0.34 
|Third Quarter
(August 1, 2004  October 31, 2004)    | $0.45 | $0.38 
|Second Quarter
(May 1, 2004  July 31, 2004)         | $0.44 | $0.36 
|First Quarter
(February 1, 2004  April 30, 2004)    | $0.75 | $0.33 
|2003                                                 | $0.84 | $0.06 
|2002                                                 | $0.30 | $0.075



---

-66-





The closing price of our common shares on the Toronto Stock Exchange on May 3, 2006, was $2.30.

The high and low sale prices for our common shares on the Over The Counter Bulletin Board (since April 13, 1999, and prior thereto on the Nasdaq Small Cap Market) for each of the six months preceding May 3, 2006, each fiscal quarter in each of the last two full financial years and subsequent period and each of the last five full financial years are as follows:

|                                                     | High   | Low    
|---------------------------------------------------- | ------ | -------
|2006                                                 | $2.20  | $0.901 
|April                                                | $2.20  | $1.38  
|March                                                | $1.698 | $1.40  
|February                                             | $1.59  | $0.901 
|2005                                                 | $1.19  | $0.30  
|January                                              | $1.19  | $0.88  
|December                                             | $1.00  | $0.815 
|November                                             | $0.95  | $0.76  
|Fourth Quarter
(November 1, 2005  January 31, 2006) | $1.19  | $0.76  
|Third Quarter
(August 1, 2005  October 31, 2005)    | $1.05  | $0.30  
|Second Quarter
(May 1, 2005  July 31, 2005)         | $0.51  | $0.305 
|First Quarter
(February 1, 2005  April 30, 2005)    | $0.57  | $0.31  
|2004                                                 | $0.58  | $0.24  
|Fourth Quarter
(November 1, 2004  January 31,2005)  | $0.58  | $0.27  
|Third Quarter
(August 1, 2004  October 31, 2004)    | $0.37  | $0.24  
|Second Quarter
(May 1, 2004  July 31, 2004)         | $0.33  | $0.24  
|First Quarter
(February 1, 2004  April 30, 2004)    | $0.56  | $0.24  
|2003                                                 | $0.635 | $0.06  
|2002                                                 | $0.15  | $0.0479

The closing price of our common shares on the Over The Counter Bulletin Board on May 3, 2006, was  $2.10.

B.  Plan of Distribution

This Form 20-F is being filed as an Annual Report under the Exchange Act and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this section.

C.  Markets

Our common shares traded on the Vancouver Stock Exchange from March 29, 1988, until August 21, 1998, when they were delisted from trading at our request.  Our common shares have traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange since January 28, 1994.  We trade our shares on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the trading symbol "PTQ". Our common shares traded on the Nasdaq Small Cap Market from February 5, 1996, until April 12, 1999, when they were delisted for failure to meet minimum bid requirements and began to trade on the Over The Counter Bulletin Board. We trade our shares on the Over The Counter Bulletin Board under the trading symbol "PTQMF".  We commenced trading on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange under the trading symbol P7Z on October 24, 2005.



---

-67-





D.  Selling Shareholders

This Form 20-F is being filed as an Annual Report under the Exchange Act and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this section.

E.  Dilution

This Form 20-F is being filed as an Annual Report under the Exchange Act and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this section.

F.  Expenses of the Issue

This Form 20F is being filed as an Annual Report under the Exchange Act and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this section.

ITEM 10.  ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

A.  Share Capital

This Form 20F is being filed as an Annual Report under the Exchange Act and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this section.



B.  Memorandum and Articles of Association

We were incorporated on October 10, 1985, pursuant to the Company Actwhich has been replaced by the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia) (the "Act") and is registered with the Registrar of Companies for British Columbia under incorporation number 298967.  We are not limited in our objects and purposes.

With respect to our directors, our Articles provide that a director who is, in any way, directly or indirectly interested in an existing or proposed contract or transaction with PTQ, or who holds any office or possesses any property whereby, directly or indirectly, a duty or interest might be created to conflict with his duty or interest as a director, shall declare the nature and extent of his interest in such contract or transaction or the conflict or potential conflict with his duty and interest as a director, as the case may be, in accordance with the provisions of the Act and shall abstain from voting in respect thereof.  This prohibition does not apply to:

(i)

any such contract or transaction relating to a loan to Petaquilla Minerals, which a director or a specified corporation or a specific firm in which he has an interest has guaranteed or joined in guaranteeing the repayment of the loan or any part of the loan;

(ii)

any contract or transaction made or to be made with, or for the benefit of a holding corporation or a subsidiary corporation of which a director is a director;

(iii)

any contract by a director to subscribe for or underwrite shares or debentures to be issued by  us or our subsidiary, or any contract, arrangement or transaction in which a director is, directly or indirectly interested if all the other directors are also, directly or indirectly interested in the contract, arrangement or transaction;



---

-68-





(iv)

determining the remuneration of the directors;

(v)

purchasing and maintaining insurance to cover directors against liability incurred by them as directors; or

(vi)

the indemnification of any director by us.

Our Articles also provide that the directors may from time to time on our behalf borrow such money in such manner and amount, on such security, from such sources and upon such terms and conditions as they think fit; issue bonds, debentures and other debt obligations, either outright or as security for any liability or obligation of Petaquilla Minerals, or any other person; and mortgage, charge, whether by way of specific or floating charge, or give other security on the undertaking, or on the whole or any part of our property and assets (both present and future).  Variation of these borrowing powers would require an amendment to our Articles which would, in turn, require the approval of our shareholders by way of a Special Resolution.  A Special Resolution means a resolution cast by a majority of not less than 3⁄4 of the votes cast by our shareholders who, being entitled to do so, vote in person or by proxy at our general meeting of which notice as our Articles provide and not being less than 21 days notice specifying the intention to propose the resolution as a special resolution, has been duly given (or, if every shareholder entitled to attend and vote at the meeting agrees, at a meeting of which less than 21 days notice has been given), or a resolution consented to in writing by each of our shareholders who would have been entitled to vote in person or by proxy at our general meeting, and a resolution so consented to is deemed to be a special resolution passed at our general meeting.

There is no requirement in our Articles or in the Act requiring retirement or non-retirement of directors under an age limit requirement, nor is there any minimum shareholding required for a director's qualification.

Holders of our common shares are entitled to vote at meetings of shareholders, and a Special Resolution, as described above, is required to effect a change in the rights of shareholders.  Holders of common shares are not entitled to pre-emptive rights.  Holders of common shares are entitled, ratably, to the remaining property of PTQupon our liquidation, dissolution or winding up, and such holders receive dividends if, as, and when, declared by our directors.  There are no restrictions on the purchase or redemption of common shares by us while there is an arrearage in the payment of dividends or sinking fund installments.  There is no liability on the part of any shareholder to further capital calls by us nor any provision discriminating against any existing or prospective holder of our securities as a result of such shareholder owning a substantial number of shares.  There are no limitations on the rights to own securities, including the rights of non-resident or foreign shareholders to hold or exercise voting rights on the securities imposed by the Act or by our constating documents.

We are required to give our registered shareholders not less than 21 days notice of any general meeting held by us unless all such shareholders consent to reduce or waive the period.  In addition, we are obliged to give notice to registrants and intermediaries who hold shares on behalf of the ultimate beneficial owners no fewer than 35 or more than 60 days prior to the date of the meeting.  We then deliver, in bulk, proxy-related materials in amounts specified by the intermediaries.  None of our shares owned by registrants or intermediaries may be voted at our general meeting unless all proxy-related materials are delivered to the ultimate beneficial owners of such shares.  Such ultimate beneficial owner must then deliver a proxy to us within the time limited by us for the deposit of proxies in order to vote the shares in respect of which such person is the beneficial owner.



---

-69-





There is no provision in our Articles that would have an effect of delaying, deferring or preventing our change in control and that would operate only with respect to a merger, acquisition or corporate restructuring involving us (or any of our subsidiaries) other than a shareholder rights plan adopted by our board of directors effective April 28, 1995, which authorized the issuance of one right in respect of each common share then outstanding and each common share issued subsequent to April 28, 1995.  The rights remain attached to and trade with the common shares and are evidenced by a legend endorsed on the share certificates.  The rights are not exercisable until the occurrence of certain designated events.  Upon the acquisition by a person or group of beneficial ownership of 20% or more of the common shares (other than through a Permitted Bid (as defined in the shareholder rights plan) or through a transaction which has been approved by the board of directors), the rights will separate from the common shares, share rights certificates will be issued, the rights will be transferable separately from the common shares, and will be exercisable, entitling the holders to acquire our common shares at an effective 50% discount from the then prevailing market price for our common shares.

A takeover bid made by way of "Permitted Bid" under the rights plan will not trigger the separation and exercise of the rights.  A Permitted Bid is a bid made to all holders of common shares for all shares which are outstanding, and must be made by way of takeover bid circular.  If at the end of 60 days after a takeover bid made by way of a Permitted Bid is announced at least 50% of the outstanding common shares (excluding the bidder's) have been tendered to the bid, the bidder may take up and pay for the shares, and must also extend the bid for an additional 10 days to allow other shareholders to tender their shares.

Unless they are redeemed earlier, the rights will expire ten years from April 28, 1995.

Securities legislation in our home jurisdiction of British Columbia requires that shareholder ownership must be disclosed once a person owns beneficially or has control or direction over greater than 10% of our issued shares.  This threshold is higher than the 5% threshold under U.S. securities legislation at which shareholders must report their share ownership.

C.  Material Contracts

We have not entered into any contracts other than the ordinary course of business during the past two years.

D.  Exchange Controls

There are no governmental laws, decrees or regulations in Canada relating to restrictions on the export or import of capital, or affecting the remittance of interest, dividends or other payments to non-resident holders of our common shares.  Any remittances of dividends to United States residents are, however, subject to a 15% withholding tax (5% if the shareholder is a corporation owning at least 10% of our outstanding common shares) pursuant to Article X of the reciprocal tax treaty between Canada and the United States.  See "Item 10  Additional Information  E.  Taxation" below.

Except as provided in the Investment Canada Act (the "Act"), which has provisions which govern the acquisition of a control block of voting shares by non-Canadians of a corporation carrying on a Canadian business, there are no limitations specific to the rights of non-Canadians to hold or vote our common shares under the laws of Canada or the Province of British Columbia or in our charter documents.

Our management considers that the following general summary fairly describes those provisions of the Act pertinent to an investment in PTQ by a person who is not a Canadian resident (a "non-Canadian").



---

-70-





The Act requires a non-Canadian making an investment which would result in the acquisition of  control of the Canadian business to notify the Investment Review Division of Industry Canada, the federal agency created by the Act; or in the case of an acquisition of a Canadian business, the gross value of the assets of which exceeds certain threshold levels or the business activity of which is related to Canada's cultural heritage of national identity, to file an application for review with the Investment Review Division.

The notification procedure involves a brief statement of information about the investment on a prescribed form which is required to be filed with Investment Canada by the investor at any time up to 30 days following implementation of the investment.  Once the completed notice has been filed, a receipt bearing the certificate date will be issued to the non-Canadian investor.  The receipt must advise the investor either that the investment proposal is unconditionally non-reviewable or that the proposal will not be reviewed as long as notice of review is not issued within 21 days of the date certified under the receipt.  It is intended that investments requiring only notification will proceed without government intervention unless the investment is in a specific type of business activity related to Canada's cultural heritage and national identity.

If an investment is reviewable under the Act, an order for review must be issued within 21 days after the certified date on which notice of investment was received.  An application for review in the form prescribed is required to be filed with Investment Canada prior to the investment taking place.  Once the application has been filed, a receipt will be issued to the applicant, certifying the date on which the application was received.  For incomplete applications, a deficiency notice will be sent to the applicant, and if not done within 15 days of receipt of application, the application will be deemed to be complete as of the date it was received.  Within 45 days after the complete application has been received, the Minister responsible for the Investment Canada Act must notify the potential investor that the Minister is satisfied that the investment is likely to be of net benefit to Canada.  If within such 45-day period the Minister is unable to complete the review, the Minister has an additional 30 days to complete the review, unless the applicant agrees to a longer period.  Within such additional period, the Minister must advise either that he is satisfied or not satisfied that the investment is likely to be of net benefit to Canada.  If the time limits have elapsed, the Minister will be deemed to be satisfied that the investment is likely to be of net benefit to Canada.  The investment may not be implemented until the review has been completed and the Minister is satisfied that the investment is likely to be of net benefit to Canada.

If the Minister is not satisfied that the investment is likely to be of net benefit to Canada, the non-Canadian must not implement the investment or, if the investment has been implemented, could be penalized by being required to divest himself of control of the business that is the subject of the investment.  To date, the only types of business activities which have been prescribed by regulation as related to Canada's cultural heritage or national identity deal largely with publication, film and music industries.  Because our total assets are less than the $5 million notification threshold, and because our business activities would likely not be deemed related to Canada's cultural heritage or national identity, acquisition of a controlling interest in PTQ by a non-Canadian investor would not be subject to even the notification requirements under the Investment Canada Act.

The following investments by non-Canadians are subject to notification under the Act:

1.

an investment to establish a new Canadian business; and

2.

an investment to acquire control of a Canadian business that is not reviewable pursuant to the Act.



---

-71-





The following investments by a non-Canadian are subject to review under the Act:

1.

direct acquisition of control of Canadian businesses with assets of $5 million or more, unless the acquisition is being made by a World Trade Organization ("WTO") member country investor (the United States being a member of the WTO);

2.

direct acquisition of control of Canadian businesses with assets of $250,000,000 or more by a WTO investor;

3.

indirect acquisition of control of Canadian business with assets of $5 million or more if such assets represent more than 50% of the total value of the assets of the entities, the control of which is being acquired, unless the acquisition is being made by a WTO investor, in which case there is no review;

4.

indirect acquisition of control of Canadian businesses with assets of $50 million or more even if such assets represent less than 50% of the total value of the assets of the entities, the control of which is being acquired, unless the acquisition is being made by a WTO investor, in which case there is no review; and

5.

an investment subject to notification that would not otherwise be reviewable if the Canadian business engages in the activity of publication, distribution or sale of books, magazines, periodicals, newspapers, film or video recordings, audio or video music recordings, or music in print or machine-readable form.

Generally speaking, an acquisition is direct if it involves the acquisition of control of the Canadian business or of its Canadian parent or grandparent and an acquisition is indirect if it involves the acquisition of control of a non-Canadian parent or grandparent of an entity carrying on the Canadian business.  Control may be acquired through the acquisition of actual voting control by the acquisition of voting shares of a Canadian corporation or through the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of the Canadian business.  No change of voting control will be deemed to have occurred if less than one-third of the voting control of a Canadian corporation is acquired by an investor.

A WTO investor, as defined in the Act, includes an individual who is a national of a member country of the World Trade Organization or who has the right of permanent residence in relation to that WTO member, a government or government agency of a WTO investor-controlled corporation, limited partnership, trust or joint venture and a corporation, limited partnership, trust or joint venture that is neither WTO-investor controlled or Canadian controlled of which two-thirds of its board of directors, general partners or trustees, as the case may be, or any combination of Canadians and WTO investors.

The higher thresholds for WTO investors do not apply if the Canadian business engages in activities in certain sectors such as uranium, financial services, transportation services or communications.

The Act specifically exempts certain transactions from either notification or review.  Included among this category of transactions is the acquisition of voting shares or other voting interests by any person in the ordinary course of that person's business as a trader or dealer in securities.



---

-72-





E.  Taxation

Material Canadian Federal Income Tax Consequences

Through consultation with counsel, our management believes that the following general summary accurately describes all material Canadian federal income tax consequences applicable to a holder of our common shares who is a resident of the United States and who is not a resident of Canada and who does not use or hold, and is not deemed to use or hold, his common shares of PTQin connection with carrying on a business in Canada (a "non-resident holder").

This summary is based upon the current provisions of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the "ITA"), the regulations thereunder (the "Regulations"), the current publicly announced administrative and assessing policies of Canada, Customs and Revenue Agency, and all specific proposals (the "Tax Proposals") to amend the ITA and Regulations announced by the Minister of Finance (Canada) prior to the date hereof.  This summary assumes that the Tax Proposals will be enacted in their form as of the date of this Annual Report.  This description, except for the Tax Proposals, does not take into account or anticipate any changes in law, whether by legislative, government or judicial action, nor does it take into account provincial, territorial, or foreign tax considerations which may differ significantly from those discussed herein.

Dividends

Dividends paid on our common shares to a non-resident holder will be subject to withholding tax.  The Canada-U.S. Income Tax Convention (1980) (the "Treaty") provides that the normal 25% withholding tax rate under the ITA is reduced to 15% on dividends paid on shares of a corporation resident in Canada (such as Petaquilla Minerals) to beneficial owners of the dividends who are residents of the United States, and also provides for a further reduction of this rate to 5% where the beneficial owner of the dividends is a corporation that is a resident of the United States which owns at least 10% of the voting shares of the corporation paying the dividend.

No dividends have ever been paid by the Company.

Capital Gains

Under the ITA, a taxpayer's capital gain or capital loss from a disposition of a share of our company is the amount, if any, by which his proceeds of disposition exceed (or are exceeded by) the aggregate of his adjusted cost base of the share and reasonable expenses of disposition.  One half of a capital gain (the "taxable capital gain") is included in income, and one half of a capital loss in a year (the "allowable capital loss") is deductible from taxable capital gains realized in the same year.  The amount by which a shareholder's allowable capital loss exceeds his taxable capital gains in a year may be deducted from a taxable capital gain realized by the shareholder in the three previous or any subsequent year, subject to certain restrictions in the case of a corporate shareholder.

A non-resident holder is not subject to tax under the ITA in respect of a capital gain realized upon the disposition of a share of a public corporation unless the share represents "taxable Canadian property" to the holder thereof.  We are a public corporation for purposes of the ITA and a common share of PTQwill be taxable Canadian property to a non-resident holder if, at any time during the period of five years immediately preceding the disposition, the non-resident holder, persons with whom the non-resident holder did not deal at arm's length, or the non-resident holder and persons with whom he did not deal at arm's length together owned not less than 25% of the issued shares of any class of shares of Petaquilla Minerals.



---

-73-





Where a non-resident holder who is an individual ceased to be resident in Canada, and at the time he ceased to be a Canadian resident elected to have his shares treated as taxable Canadian property, he will be subject to Canadian tax on any capital gain realized on disposition of our shares, subject to the relieving provisions of the Treaty described below.  Our shares may also be taxable Canadian property to a holder if the holder acquired them pursuant to certain tax-deferred "rollover" transactions whereby the holder exchanged property that was taxable Canadian property for our shares.

Where the non-resident holder realized a capital gain on a disposition of our shares that constitute taxable Canadian property, the Treaty relieves the non-resident shareholder from liability for Canadian tax on such capital gains unless:

(a)

the value of the shares is derived principally from "real property" in Canada, including the right to explore for or exploit natural resources and rights to amounts computed by reference to production from natural resources, which is the case for Petaquilla Minerals,

(b)

the non-resident holder is an individual who was resident in Canada for not less than 120 months during any period of 20 consecutive years preceding, and at any time during the 10 years immediately preceding, the disposition and the shares were owned by him when he ceased to be resident in Canada or are property substituted for property that was owned at that time, or

(c)

the shares formed part of the business property of a "permanent establishment" or pertained to a fixed base used for the purpose of performing independent personal services that the shareholder has or had in Canada within the 12 months preceding the disposition.

Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences

The following summary is a general discussion of the material United States Federal income tax considerations to U.S. holders of our shares under current law.  This discussion assumes that U.S. holders hold their shares of our common stock as capital assets within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code").  It does not discuss all the tax consequences that may be relevant to particular holders in light of their circumstances or to holders subject to special rules, such as tax-exempt organizations, qualified retirement plans, financial institutions, insurance companies, real estate investment trusts, regulated investment companies, broker-dealers, non-resident alien individuals or foreign corporations whose ownership of our shares is not effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States, shareholders who acquired their stock through the exercise of employee stock options or otherwise as compensation, shareholders who hold their stock as ordinary assets and not capital assets and any other non-U.S. holders.  In addition, U.S. holders may be subject to state, local or foreign tax consequences.  No opinion or representation with respect to the United States Federal income tax consequences to any such holder or prospective holder is being made by us herein.  Holders and prospective holders should therefore consult with their own tax advisors with respect to their particular circumstances.  This discussion covers all material tax consequences.

The following discussion is based upon the sections of the Code, Treasury Regulations, published Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") rulings, published administrative positions of the IRS and court decisions that are currently applicable, any or all of which could be materially and adversely changed, possibly on a retroactive basis, at any time.  This decision does not consider the potential effects, both adverse and beneficial, of any recently proposed legislation that, if enacted, could be applied, possibly on a retroactive basis, at any time.  Accordingly, holders and prospective holders of our shares should consult their own tax advisors about the Federal, state, local, estate, and foreign tax consequences of purchasing, owning and disposing of our shares.



---

-74-





U.S. Holders

As used herein, a "U.S. Holder" includes a holder of our shares who is a citizen or resident of the United States, a corporation created or organized in or under the laws of the United States or of any political subdivision thereof, any entity that is taxable as a corporation for U.S. tax purposes and any other person or entity whose ownership of our shares is effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States.  A U.S. Holder does not include persons subject to special provisions of Federal income tax law, such as tax exempt organizations, qualified retirement plans, financial institutions, insurance companies, real estate investment trusts, regulated investment companies, broker-dealers, non-resident alien individuals or foreign corporations whose ownership of our shares is not effectively connected with conduct of trade or business in the United States, shareholders who acquired their stock through the exercise of employee stock options or otherwise as compensation and shareholders who hold their stock as ordinary assets and not as capital assets.

Distributions on Common Shares of the Company

U.S. Holders receiving dividend distribution (including constructive dividends) with respect to our shares are required to include in gross income for United States Federal income tax purposes the gross amount of such distribution to the extent that we have current or accumulated earnings and profits as defined under U.S. Federal tax law, without reduction for any Canadian income tax withheld from such distributions.  Such Canadian tax withheld may be credited, subject to certain limitations, against the U.S. Holder's United States Federal income tax liability or, alternatively, may be deducted in computing the U.S. Holder's United States Federal taxable income by those who itemize deductions.  (See more detailed discussion at "Foreign Tax Credit" below).  To the extent that distributions exceed our current or accumulated earnings and profits, they will be treated first as a return of capital up to the U.S. Holder's adjusted basis in the shares and thereafter as gain from the sale or exchange of the shares.  Preferential tax rates for long-term net capital gains are applicable to a U.S. Holder that is an individual, estate or trust.  There are currently no preferential tax rates for long term capital gains for a U.S. Holder that is a corporation.

Dividends paid on our shares will not generally be eligible for the dividends received deduction provided to corporations receiving dividends from certain United States corporations.  A U.S. Holder that is a corporation may, under certain circumstances, be entitled to a 70% deduction of the United States source portion of dividends received from us (unless we qualify as a "foreign personal holding company" or a "passive foreign investment company", as defined below) if such U.S. Holder owns shares representing at least 10% of the voting power and value of Petaquilla Minerals.  The availability of this deduction is subject to several complex limitations that are beyond the scope of this discussion.

In the case of foreign currency received as a dividend that is not converted by the recipient into U.S. dollars on the date of receipt, a U.S. Holder will have a tax basis in the foreign currency equal to its U.S. dollar value on the date of receipt.  Generally, any gain or loss recognized upon a subsequent sale or other disposition of the foreign currency, including the exchange for U.S. dollars, will be ordinary income or loss.  However, for tax years after 1997, an individual whose realized foreign exchange gain does not exceed U.S. $200 will not recognize that gain, to the extent that there are not expenses associated with the transaction that meet the requirement for deductibility as a trade or business expense other than travel expenses in connection with a business trip (or as an expense for the production of income).



---

-75-





Foreign Tax Credit

A U.S. Holder who pays (or has withheld from distribution) Canadian income tax with respect to the ownership of our shares may be entitled, at the option of the U.S. Holder, to either a deduction or a tax credit for such foreign tax paid or withheld.  Generally, it will be more advantageous to claim a credit because a credit reduces United States Federal income taxes on a dollar-for-dollar basis, while a deduction merely reduces the taxpayer's income subject to tax.  This election is made on a year-by-year basis and applies to all foreign taxes paid by (or withheld from) the U.S. Holder during the year.  There are significant and complex limitations that apply to the credit, among which is the general limitation that the credit cannot exceed the proportionate share of the U.S. Holder's United States Federal income tax liability that the U.S. Holder's foreign source income bears to this or its worldwide taxable income.  In the determination of the application of this limitation, the various items of income and deduction must be classified into foreign and domestic sources.  Complex rules govern this classification process.  There are further limitations on the foreign tax credit for certain types of income such as "passive income", "high withholding tax interest", "financial services income", "shipping income", and certain other classifications of income.  The availability of the foreign tax credit and the application of the limitations on the credit are fact specific and holders and prospective holders of our shares should consult their own tax advisors regarding their individual circumstances.

Information Reporting and Backup Withholding

U.S. information reporting requirements may apply with respect to the payment of dividends to U.S. Holders of our common shares.  Under Treasury regulations currently in effect, non-corporate holders may be subject to backup withholding at a 31% rate with respect to dividends when such holder (1) fails to finish or certify a correct taxpayer identification number to the payor in the required manner, (2) is notified by the IRS that it has failed to report payments of interest or dividends properly or (3) fails, under certain circumstances, to certify that it has been notified by the IRS that it is subject to backup withholding for failure to report interest and dividend payments.  Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules from a payment to a U.S. Holder generally will be allowed as a credit against the U.S. Holder's U.S. federal income tax liability and may entitle the U.S. Holder to a refund, provided that the required information is furnished to the IRS.  Certain U.S. Holders, including corporations, are not subject to backup withholding.

Disposition of Common Shares of the Company

A U.S. Holder will recognize a gain or loss upon the sale of our shares equal to the difference, if any, between (i) the amount of cash plus the fair market value of any property received, and (ii) the shareholder's tax basis in our shares.  This gain or loss will be a capital gain or loss if the shares are a capital asset in the hands of the U.S. Holder, and will be a short-term or long-term capital gain or loss depending upon the holding period of the U.S. Holder.  Gains and losses are netted and combined according to special rules in arriving at the overall capital gain or loss for a particular tax year.  Deductions for net capital loss are subject to significant limitations.  Corporate capital losses (other than losses of corporations electing under Subchapter S of the Code) are deductible to the extent of capital gains.  Non-corporate taxpayers may deduct net capital losses, whether short-term or long-germ, up to U.S. $3,000 a year (U.S. $1,500 in the case of a married individual filing separately).  For U.S. Holders which are individuals, any unused portion of such net capital loss may be carried over to be used in later tax years until such net capital loss is thereby exhausted.  For U.S. Holders which are corporations (other than corporations subject to Subchapter S of the Code), an unused net capital loss may be carried back three years from the loss year and carried forward five years from the loss year to be offset against capital gains until such net capital loss is thereby exhausted.



---

-76-





Currency Exchange Gains or Losses

U.S. holders generally are required to calculate their taxable incomes in United States dollars.  Accordingly, a U.S. holder who purchases our common shares with Canadian dollars will be required to determine the tax basis of such shares in United States dollars based on the exchange rate prevailing on the settlement date of the purchase (and may be required to recognize the unrealized gain or loss, if any, in the Canadian currency surrendered in the purchase transaction).  Similarly, a U.S. holder receiving dividends or sales proceeds from our common shares in Canadian dollars will be required to compute the dividend income or the amount realized on the sale, as the case may be, in United States dollars based on the exchange rate prevailing at the time of receipt in the case of dividends and on the settlement date in the case of sales on an established securities exchange.  Gain or loss, if any, recognized on a disposition of Canadian currency in connection with the described transactions generally will be treated as ordinary gain or loss.

Other Considerations

In the following circumstances, the above sections of this discussion may not describe the United States Federal income tax consequences resulting from the holding and disposition of our common shares (we do not believe that it will qualify in the next year, or has qualified within the past three fiscal years, as a "foreign personal holding company", "foreign investment company", "passive foreign investment company" or "controlled foreign corporation" as discussed below):

Foreign Personal Holding Company

If at any time during a taxable year more than 50% of the total combined voting power or the total value of our outstanding shares is owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals who are citizens of the United States and 60% or more of our gross income for such year was derived from certain passive sources (e.g., from dividends received from our subsidiaries), we would be treated as a "foreign personal holding company".  In that event, U.S. Holders that hold our common shares (on the earlier of the last day of our tax year or the last date in which we were a foreign personal holding company) would be required to include in gross income for such year their allocable portions of such passive income to the extent we do not actually distribute such income.

Foreign Investment Company

If 50% or more of the combined voting power or total value of our outstanding shares are held, directly or indirectly, by citizens or residents of the United States, United States domestic partnerships or corporations, or estates or trusts other than foreign estates or trusts (as defined by the Code Section 7701(a)(31)), and we are found to be engaged primarily in the business of investing, reinvesting, or trading in securities, commodities, or any interest therein, it is possible that we might be treated as a "foreign investment company" as defined in Section 1246 of the Code, causing all or part of any gain realized by a U.S. Holder selling or exchanging our common shares to be treated as ordinary income rather than capital gains.



---

-77-





Passive Foreign Investment Company

As a foreign corporation with U.S. Holders, we could potentially be treated as a passive foreign investment company ("PFIC"), as defined in Section 1297 of the Code, depending upon the percentage of our income which is passive, or the percentage of our assets which are producing passive income (generally 75% or more of our gross income in a taxable year is passive income, or the average percentage of our assets (by value) during the taxable year which produce passive income or which are held for production of same is at least 50%).  Passive income is generally defined to include gross income in the nature of dividends, interest, royalties, rents and annuities; excess of gains over losses from certain transactions in any commodities not arising inter aliafrom a PFIC whose business is actively involved in such commodities; certain foreign currency gains; and other similar types of income.  U.S. Holders owning shares of a PFIC are subject to an additional tax and to an interest charge based on the value of deferral of tax for the period during which the common shares of the PFIC are owned, in addition to treatment of gain realized on the disposition of common shares of the PFIC as ordinary income rather than capital gain.  However, if the U.S. Holder makes a timely election to treat a PFIC as a qualified electing fund ("QEF") with respect to such shareholder's interest therein, the above-described rules generally will not apply.  Instead, the electing U.S. Holder would include annually in his gross income his pro rata share of the PFIC's ordinary earnings and net capital gain regardless of whether such income or gain was actually distributed.  A U.S. Holder of a QEF can, however, elect to defer the payment of United States Federal income tax on such income inclusions.  Special rules apply to U.S. Holders who own their interests in a PFIC through intermediate entities or person.

Effective for tax years of U.S. Holders beginning after December 31, 1997, U.S. Holders who hold, actually or constructively, marketable stock of a foreign corporation that qualifies as a PFIC may elect to mark such stock to the market (a "mark-to-market election").  If such an election is made, such U.S. Holder will not be subject to the special taxation rules of PFIC described above for the taxable year for which the mark-to-market election is made.  A U.S. Holder who makes such an election will include in income for the taxable year an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value of our shares as of the close of such tax year over such U.S. Holder's adjusted basis in such shares.  In addition, the U.S. Holder is allowed a deduction for the lesser of (i) the excess, if any, of such U.S. Holder's adjusted tax basis in the shares over the fair market value of such shares as of the close of the tax year, or (ii) the excess, if any of (A) the mark-to-market gains for our shares included by such U.S. Holder for prior tax years, including any amount which would have been included for any prior year but for Section 1291 interest on tax deferral rules discussed above with respect to a U.S. Holder, who has not made a timely QEF election during the year in which he holds (or is deemed to have held) our shares and we are a PFIC ("Non-Electing U.S. Holder"), over (B) the mark-to-market losses for shares that were allowed as deductions for prior tax years.  A U.S. Holder's adjusted tax basis in our shares will be increased or decreased to reflect the amount included or deducted as a result of mark-to-market election.  A mark-to-market election will apply to the tax year for which the election is made and to all later tax years, unless the PFIC stock ceases to be marketable or the IRS consents to the revocation of the election.

The IRS has issued proposed regulations that, subject to certain exceptions, would treat as taxable certain transfers of PFIC stock by a Non-Electing U.S. Holder that are generally not otherwise taxed, such as gifts, exchanges pursuant to corporate reorganizations, and transfers at death.  Generally, in such cases, the basis of our shares in the hands of the transferee and the basis of any property received in the exchange for those shares would be increased by the amount of gain recognized.  A U.S. Holder who has made a timely QEF election (as discussed below) will not be taxed on certain transfers of PFIC stock, such as gifts, exchanges pursuant to corporate reorganization, and transfers at death.  The transferee's basis in this case will depend on the manner of transfer.  The specific tax effect to the U.S. Holder and the transferee may vary based on the manner in which our shares are transferred.  Each U.S. Holder should consult a tax advisor with respect to how the PFIC rules affect their tax situation.



---

-78-





The PFIC and QEF election rules are complex.  U.S. Holders should consult a tax advisor regarding the availability and procedure for making the QEF election as well as the applicable method for recognizing gains or earnings and profits under the foregoing rules.

Controlled Foreign Corporation

If more than 50% of the voting power of all classes of stock or total value of our stock is owned, directly or indirectly, by citizens or residents of the United States, United States domestic partnerships and corporations or estates or trusts other than foreign estates or trusts, each of whom owns 10% or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of our stock("United States shareholder"), we could be treated as a "controlled foreign corporation" under Subpart F of the Code.  This classification would effect many complex results including the required inclusion by such United States shareholders in income of their pro rata shares of "Subpart F income" (as specifically defined by the Code) of Petaquilla Minerals.  Subpart F requires current inclusions in the income of United States shareholders to the extent of a controlled foreign corporation's accumulated earnings invested in "excess passive" assets (as defined by the Code).  In addition, under Section 1248 of the Code, gain from sale or exchange of stock by a holder of our common shares who is or was a United States shareholder at any time during the five year period ending with the sale or exchange is treated as ordinary dividend income to the extent of our earnings and profits attributable to the stock sold or exchanged.  Because of the complexity of Subpart F, and because it is not clear that Subpart F would apply to the holders of our common shares, a more detailed review of these rules is outside the scope of this discussion.

We are both a PFIC and controlled foreign corporation, we will generally not be treated as a PFIC with respect to United States shareholders of the controlled foreign corporation.  This rule generally will be effective for our taxable years ending with or within such taxable years of United States shareholders.

The foregoing summary is based upon the sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), Treasury Regulations, published Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") rulings, published administrative positions of the IRS and court decisions that are currently applicable, any or all of which could be materially and adversely changed, possibly on a retroactive basis, at any time.  This discussion does not consider the potential effects, both adverse and beneficial, of any recently proposed legislation that, if enacted, could be applied, possibly on a retroactive basis, at any time.  Accordingly, holders and prospective holders of our shares should consult their own tax advisors about the Federal, state, local, estate, and foreign tax consequences of purchasing, owning and disposing of our shares.

F.  Dividends and Paying Agents

This Form 20-F is being filed as an Annual Report under the Exchange Act and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this section.

G.  Statements by Experts

This Form 20-F is being filed as an Annual Report under the Exchange Act and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this section.

H.  Documents on Display

Any documents referred to in this Annual Report may be inspected at our head office, Suite 1820, 701 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V7Y 1K8, during normal business hours.



---

-79-





I.  Subsidiary Information

There is no information relating to our subsidiaries which must be provided in Canada and which is not otherwise called for by the body of generally accepted accounting principles used in preparing the financial statements.

ITEM 11.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK

We anticipate our primary market risk, if any, to be related to fluctuations in exchange rates.  Exchange rate risk may arise if we are required to use different currencies for various aspects of our operations.  At present, our functional currency is the Canadian dollar.  Based on our overall exchange rate risk as at January 31, 2006, we believe that a ten percent change in exchange rates would not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, or changes in financial position.  We intend to monitor our exchange rate risk and take reasonable steps to reduce our exposure.  We do not intend to purchase or sell derivative instruments for speculative purposes.

ITEM 12.  DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES

This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the Exchange Act and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item.

PART II

ITEM 13.  DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGE AND DELINQUENCIES

There has not been a material default in the payment of principal, interest, a sinking or purchase fund installment, or any other material default not cured within thirty days, relating to our indebtedness or any of our significant subsidiaries.  There are no payments of dividends by us in arrears, nor has there been any other material delinquency relating to any class of our preference shares.

ITEM 14.  MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Effective April 28, 1995, our board of directors adopted a shareholder rights plan and authorized the issuance of one right in respect of each common share of PTQthen outstanding and each common share issued subsequent to April 28, 1995.  The rights remain attached to and trade with the common shares and are evidenced by a legend endorsed on the share certificates.  The rights are not exercisable until the occurrence of certain designated events.  Upon the acquisition by a person or group of beneficial ownership of 20% or more of our common shares (other than through a Permitted Bid (as defined in the shareholder rights plan) or through a transaction which has been approved by the board of directors), the rights will separate from the common shares, share rights certificates will be issued, the rights will be transferable separately from the common shares, and will be exercisable, entitling the holders to acquire our common shares at an effective 50% discount from the then prevailing market price for our common shares.

A takeover bid made by way of "Permitted Bid" under the rights plan will not trigger the separation and exercise of the rights.  A Permitted Bid is a bid made to all holders of common shares for all shares which are outstanding, and must be made by way of takeover bid circular.  If at the end of 60 days after a takeover bid made by way of a Permitted Bid is announced at least 50% of the outstanding common shares (excluding the bidder's) have been tendered to the bid, the bidder may take up and pay for the shares, and must also extend the bid for an additional 10 days to allow other shareholders to tender their shares.



---

-80-





The rights plan was approved by our shareholders at our annual general meeting held on June 8, 1995.  Unless they are redeemed earlier, the rights will expire ten years from April 28, 1995.

ITEM 15.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures.  As of January 31, 2006, an evaluation was carried out by our President and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended).  Based on that evaluation, our President and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were adequate to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.  During the fiscal year ended January 31, 2006, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 16.  [RESERVED]

ITEM 16A.  AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT

We believe that the members of our audit committee and of our board of directors are collectively capable of analyzing and evaluating our financial statements and understanding internal controls and procedures for financial reporting.

ITEM 16B.  CODE OF ETHICS

Effective October 25, 2004, our company's board of directors adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to, among other persons, our company's president (being our principal executive officer) and our company's chief financial officer (being our principal financial and accounting officer and controller), as well as persons performing similar functions. As adopted, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics sets forth written standards that are designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote:

(1)

honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships;

(2)

full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that we file with, or submit to, the Securities and Exchange Commission and in other public communications made by us;

(3)

compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations;

(4)

the prompt internal reporting of violations of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics to an appropriate person or persons identified in the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics; and

(5)

accountability for adherence to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.

Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics requires, among other things, that all of our company's personnel shall be accorded full access to our president and chief financial officer with respect to any matter which may arise relating to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. Further, all of our company's personnel are to be accorded full access to our company's board of directors if any such matter involves an alleged breach of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics by our president or chief financial officer.



---

-81-





In addition, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics emphasizes that all employees, and particularly managers and/or supervisors, have a responsibility for maintaining financial integrity within our company, consistent with generally accepted accounting principles, and federal, provincial and state securities laws. Any employee who becomes aware of any incidents involving financial or accounting manipulation or other irregularities, whether by witnessing the incident or being told of it, must report it to his or her immediate supervisor or to our company's president or chief financial officer. If the incident involves an alleged breach of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics by the president or chief financial officer, the incident must be reported to any member of our board of directors. Any failure to report such inappropriate or irregular conduct of others is to be treated as a severe disciplinary matter. It is against our company policy to retaliate against any individual who reports in good faith the violation or potential violation of our company's Code of Business Conduct and Ethics by another.

Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is filed herewith with the Securities and Exchange Commission as Exhibit 11.A to this annual report. We will provide a copy of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics to any person without charge, upon request. Requests can be sent to: Petaquilla Minerals Ltd., Suite 1820 - 701 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V7Y 1K8

ITEM 16C.  PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The aggregate amounts billed by our auditors to us for each of the fiscal years ended January 31, 2006 ("Fiscal 2006") and 2005 ("Fiscal 2005") for audit fees, audit-related fees, tax fees and all other fees are set forth below:

|                      | Year EndedJanuary 31, 2006 | Year EndedJanuary 31, 2005
|--------------------- | -------------------------- | --------------------------
|Audit Fees(1)         | $20,000(4)                 | $23,700                   
|Audit-Related Fees(2) | Nil                        | Nil                       
|Tax Fees(3)           | Nil                        | $3,000                    
|All Other Fees        | Nil                        | Nil                       
|Totals                | $20,000(4)                 | $26.700                   

(1)  "Audit Fees" represent fees for the audit of our annual financial statements..

(2)  "Audit-Related Fees" represent fees for assurance and related services that are related to the performance of the audit.

(3)  "Tax Fees" represent fees for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.

(4)  Audit Fees for the Year Ended January 31, 2006, are estimated.

The audit committee has adopted procedures requiring audit committee review and approval in advance of all particular engagements for services provided by our independent auditors.  Consistent with applicable laws, the procedures permit limited amounts of services, other than audit, review or attest services, to be approved by one or more members of the audit committee pursuant to authority delegated by the audit committee, provided the audit committee is informed of each particular service.  All of the engagements and fees for Fiscal 2005 were approved by the audit committee.  The audit committee reviews with our auditors whether the non-audit services to be provided are compatible with maintaining the auditors' independence.  The board has determined that, starting in the fiscal year ending January 31, 2005, fees paid to the independent auditors for non-audit services in any year will not exceed the fees paid for audit services during the year.  Permissible non-audit services will be limited to fees for tax services, accounting assistance or audits in connection with acquisitions, and other services specifically related to accounting or audit matters such as audits of employee benefit plans



---

-82-





ITEM 16D.  EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES

Not Applicable.

ITEM 16E.  PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS

Not Applicable.

PART III

ITEM 17.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

See the Financial Statements and Exhibits listed in Item 19 hereof and filed as part of this Annual Report.  These financial statements were prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP and are expressed in Canadian dollars.  Such financial statements have been reconciled to U.S. GAAP (see Note 19 therein).  For a history of exchange rates in effect for Canadian dollars as against U.S. dollars, see page 12 of this Annual Report.

ITEM 18.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Not applicable

ITEM 19.  EXHIBITS

(a)  Financial Statements

|Description of Document                                                                    | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | 
|                                                                                           | 
|Cover Sheet                                                                                | 
|Management's Responsibility for Financial Reporting                                        | 
|Independent Auditor's Report dated April 5, 2006                                           | 
|Balance Sheets as at January 31, 2006, and 2005                                            | 
|Statements of Loss and Deficit for the Fiscal Years Ended January 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004 | 
|Statements of Cash Flows for the Fiscal Years Ended January 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004       | 
|Notes to the Financial Statements                                                          | 



---

-83-





(b)  Exhibits

|ExhibitNumber | Description of Document                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               | 
|------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|              |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       | 
|*1.A.         | Memorandum of Incorporation and Articles of Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  | 
|*2.A.         | Shareholder Rights Plan Agreement dated April 28, 1995, between Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. and Montreal Trust Company of Canada                                                                                                                                                                                         | 
|*3.A.         | Share Purchase and Voting Trust Agreement dated December 29, 1994, between Petaquilla Minerals Ltd., Teck Corporation and Montreal Trust Company of Canada                                                                                                                                                            | 
|*3.B.         | Special Resolution dated June 8, 1995, increasing the authorized share capital of Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.                                                                                                                                                                                                            | 
|*4.A.         | Agreement dated April 7, 1992, between Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. and Minnova (Panama) Inc. to acquire a 40% interest in Petaquilla Property                                                                                                                                                                            | 
|*4.B.         | Letter of Intent dated October 4, 1994, between Petaquilla Minerals Ltd., Inmet Mining Corporation, Minnova (Panama) Inc. and Georecursos Internacional, S.A. with respect to the Petaquilla Property                                                                                                                 | 
|*4.C.         | Share Purchase Agreement dated April 14, 1993, between Petaquilla Minerals, S.A., Almond Holdings S.A. and Georecursos Internacional, S.A. with respect to the acquisition of all of the issued and outstanding shares of Georecursos Internacional, S.A., as amended by First Amending Agreement dated June 7, 1993. | 
|*4.D.         | Financing Agreement dated April 29, 1991, between Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. and Teck Corporation                                                                                                                                                                                                                       | 
|*4.E.         | Anti-dilution Agreement dated July 7, 1993, between Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. and Almond Holding S.A.                                                                                                                                                                                                                  | 
|*4.F.         | Option Agreement dated August 10, 1993, between Petaquilla Minerals, S.A., Madison Enterprises Corp. and Madison Enterprises (Latin America), S.A. with respect to the Belencillo Property.                                                                                                                           | 
|*4.G.         | Association Agreement dated September 23, 1994, between Petaquilla Minerals, S.A. and Madison Enterprises (Latin America), S.A., with respect to the Belencillo Property, as amended                                                                                                                                  | 
|*4.H.         | Heads of Agreement dated November 7, 1994, between Petaquilla Minerals Ltd., Georecursos Internacional, S.A. and Teck Corporation                                                                                                                                                                                     | 
|*4.I.         | Option Agreement dated February 17, 1994, between Petaquilla Minerals, S.A. and Arlo Resources Ltd. with respect to the Oro del Norte Property                                                                                                                                                                        | 
|*4.J.         | Option Agreement dated February 17, 1994, between Petaquilla Minerals, S.A. and Arlo Resources Ltd. with respect to the Santa Lucia Property                                                                                                                                                                          | 
|*4.K.         | Option Agreement dated January 27, 1994, between Petaquilla Minerals, S.A. and Silverstone Resources Ltd. with respect to the La Esperanza Property                                                                                                                                                                   | 
|*4.L.         | Option Agreement dated November 7, 1994, between Petaquilla Minerals, S.A., Arlo Resources Ltd. and Arlo Resources (Panama) S.A. with respect to the Iglesias Property                                                                                                                                                | 
|*4.M.         | Feasibility Study dated August, 1994, and Update dated March, 1995 prepared by Kilborn Engineering (Pacific) Ltd.                                                                                                                                                                                                     | 
|*4.N.         | Employment Agreements dated July 1, 1995, between Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. and Messrs. Idziszek, Stewart, Fifer and Mallo                                                                                                                                                                                             | 



---

-84-







|*4.O. | Petaquilla Shareholders Agreement dated February 21, 1997, between Petaquilla Minerals Ltd., Teck Corporation, Inmet Mining Corporation, Georecursos Internacional, S.A. and Minera Petaquilla, S.A.                           | 
|----- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | 
|*4.P. | Executive Summary from January 1998 Final Feasibility Study, prepared by H.A. Simons Ltd.                                                                                                                                      | 
|*4.Q. | Agreement dated November 25, 1999, between Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.,  Hyperion Resources Corp.,  Rhodes Mining NL and Ricdal Consultants Pty Ltd. respecting the acquisition of certain securities of Hyperion Resources Corp. | 
|*4.R. | Agreement dated November 26, 1999, between Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. and Alan M. Smith & Associates Ltd. respecting the acquisition of certain securities of Hyperion Resources Corp.                                           | 
|*4.S. | Assignment dated May 23, 2000, between Adrian Resources (Colorado) Ltd. And Hyperion Resources (Colorado) Ltd. respecting the Baca Ranch Property                                                                              | 
|8     | Subsidiaries of Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.                                                                                                                                                                                       | 
|11.A  | Code of Ethics                                                                                                                                                                                                                 | 
|12.A  | Certification of President Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended                                                                                                                    | 
|12.B  | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended                                                                                                      | 
|13.A  | Certification of President Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002                                                                                            | 
|13.B  | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002                                                                              | 
|*     | These exhibits were previously filed with Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.'s Registration Statement or a previous Annual Report on Form 20-F (file no. 0-26296).                                                                       | 



---

-85-





SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and has duly caused this annual report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, hereunto duly authorized.

Dated at Vancouver, British Columbia, this 3rd day of May , 2006.

PETAQUILLA MINERALS LTD.

Per: /s/ Michael Levy_____

Michael Levy, President



---

-86-























PETAQUILLA MINERALS LTD.







CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(An Exploration Stage Company)





JANUARY 31, 2006

































---

-87-







|DAVIDSON & COMPANY LLPChartered Accountants | A Partnership of Incorporated
Professionals
|------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT



To the Shareholders of

Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.



We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. as at January 31, 2006 and 2005 and the consolidated statements of operations and deficit and cash flows for the years ended January 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.



We conducted our audits in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards and with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.



In our opinion, these consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as at January 31, 2006 and 2005 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years ended January 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles.



DAVIDSON & COMPANY LLP



|Vancouver, Canada | Chartered Accountants
|----------------- | ---------------------
|                  |                      
|April 5, 2006     |                      





COMMENTS BY AUDITORS FOR U.S. READERS ON CANADA 

U.S. REPORTING DIFFERENCE



In the United States, reporting standards for auditors require the addition of an explanatory paragraph (following the opinion paragraph) when the financial statements are affected by conditions and events that cast substantial doubt on the Company's ability to continue as a going concern, such as those described in Note 1 to the financial statements.  Our report to shareholders dated April 5, 2006 is expressed in accordance with Canadian reporting standards which do not permit a reference to such events and conditions in the auditors report when these are adequately disclosed in the financial statements.



DAVIDSON & COMPANY LLP



|Vancouver, Canada | Chartered Accountants
|----------------- | ---------------------
|                  |                      
|April 5, 2006     |                      

A Member of SC INTERNATIONAL

1200 - 609 Granville Street, P.O. Box 10372, Pacific Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V7Y 1G6

Telephone (604) 687-0947  Fax (604) 687-6172



---

-88-





PETAQUILLA MINERALS LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

AS AT JANUARY 31

|                                           | 2006                               | 2005          
|------------------------------------------ | ---------------------------------- | --------------
|ASSETS                                     |                                    |               
|                                           |                                    |               
|Current                                    |                                    |               
|Cash and cash equivalents                  | $    9,171,318                     | $      891,548
|Receivables                                | 32,188                             | 71,263        
|Prepaid expenses                           | 36,650                             | 10,783        
|                                           |                                    |               
|Total current assets                       | 9,240,156                          | 973,594       
|                                           |                                    |               
|Property and equipment(Note 5)             | 285,005                            | 49,825        
|Mineral properties(Note 6)                 | 2,389,769                          | -             
|Performance bond  restricted cash(Note 7) | 892,242                            | 966,055       
|                                           |                                    |               
|                                           | $   12,807,172                     | $   1,989,474 
|                                           |                                    |               
|LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY       |                                    |               
|                                           |                                    |               
|Current                                    |                                    |               
|Accounts payable and accrued liabilities   | $      499,261                     | $      51,973 
|Other accrued liabilities                  | 51,835                             | 51,078        
|                                           |                                    |               
|Total current liabilities                  | 551,096                            | 103,051       
|                                           |                                    |               
|Shareholders equity                       |                                    |               
|Capital stock (Note 8)                     |                                    |               
|Authorized                                 |                                    |               
|100,000,000                                | common shares without par value    |               
|20,000,000                                 | preferred shares without par value |               
|Issued and outstanding                     |                                    |               
|70,246,303                                 | (2005  51,264,537) common shares  | 62,977,209    
|Contributed surplus (Note 8)               | 1,004,480                          | 887,432       
|Deficit                                    | (51,558,632)                       | (44,143,412)  
|                                           |                                    |               
|                                           | 12,423,057                         | 8,174,812     
|Treasury stock, at cost (Note 11)          |                                    |               
|Repurchased, not cancelled                 |                                    |               
|44,200                                     | (2005  1,660,200) common shares   | (166,981)     
|                                           |                                    |               
|                                           | 12,256,076                         | 1,886,423     
|                                           |                                    |               
|                                           | $   12,807,172                     | $   1,989,474 

Nature of operations(Note 1)

Commitments (Note 14)

Subsequent events(Note 18)

|On behalf of the Board: |          |                 |         
|----------------------- | -------- | --------------- | --------
|                        |          |                 |         
|Michael Levy          | Director | Richard Fifer | Director
|                        |          |                 |         

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



---

-89-





PETAQUILLA MINERALS LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND DEFICIT

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31

|                                                     | 2006             | 2005           | 2004             
|---------------------------------------------------- | ---------------- | -------------- | -----------------
|EXPENSES                                             |                  |                |                  
|Accounting and legal                                 | $   266,967      | $   161,203    | $   98,850       
|Consulting fees                                      | 291,034          | 141,158        | 40,834           
|Depreciation                                         | 56,697           | 7,660          | 13,635           
|Filing fees                                          | 30,637           | 33,679         | 68,923           
|Investor relations and shareholder information       | 388,991          | 98,790         | 43,562           
|Office administration                                | 257,859          | 81,173         | 34,810           
|Rent                                                 | 80,520           | 88,939         | 31,645           
|Resource property costs                              | 11,105           | 234,664        | 33,910           
|Stock-based compensation (Note 9)                    | 410,301          | 716,876        | 242,469          
|Travel                                               | 346,332          | 83,398         | 12,566           
|Wages and benefits                                   | 397,907          | 243,139        | 105,683          
|                                                     |                  |                |                  
|Total expenses                                       | (2,538,350)      | (1,890,679)    | (726,887)        
|                                                     |                  |                |                  
|                                                     |                  |                |                  
|OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)                               |                  |                |                  
|Foreign exchange loss                                | (77,647)         | (79,147)       | (142,267)        
|Gain on redemption of performance bond (Note 7)      | -                | 198,142        | -                
|Interest income and amortization of discount on bond | 48,239           | 18,266         | 57,964           
|Write-off of property and equipment (Note 5)         | -                | (44,855)       | -                
|                                                     |                  |                |                  
|                                                     |                  |                |                  
|Loss for the year                                    | (2,567,758)      | (1,798,273)    | (811,190)        
|                                                     |                  |                |                  
|                                                     |                  |                |                  
|Deficit, beginning of year                           | (44,143,412)     | (42,345,139)   | (41,533,949)     
|                                                     |                  |                |                  
|Loss on sale of treasury stock (Note 11)             | (4,847,462)      | -              | -                
|                                                     |                  |                |                  
|                                                     |                  |                |                  
|Deficit, end of year                                 | $(51,558,632)    | $(44,143,412)  | $(42,345,139)    
|                                                     |                  |                |                  
|                                                     |                  |                |                  
|Basic and diluted loss per common share              | $         (0.05) | $       (0.04) | $          (0.02)
|                                                     |                  |                |                  
|                                                     |                  |                |                  
|Weighted average number of common shares outstanding | 56,115,596       | 50,370,747     | 36,153,757       





The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



---

-90-





PETAQUILLA MINERALS LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31

|                                                                | 2006             | 2005            | 2004         
|--------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------- | --------------- | -------------
|CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES                            |                  |                 |              
|Loss for the year                                               | $    (2,567,758) | $   (1,798,273) | $   (811,190)
|Items not affecting cash:                                       |                  |                 |              
|Amortization of discount on bond included in interest income    | -                | -               | (11,864)     
|Depreciation                                                    | 56,697           | 7,660           | 13,635       
|Gain on redemption of performance bond                          | -                | (198,142)       | -            
|Stock-based compensation                                        | 410,301          | 716,876         | 242,469      
|Write-down of property and equipment                            | -                | 44,855          | -            
|Foreign exchange loss on performance bond (Note 7)              | 73,813           | 69,005          | 110,914      
|                                                                |                  |                 |              
|Changes in non-cash working capital items:                      |                  |                 |              
|(Increase) decrease in receivables                              | 39,075           | 17,129          | (53,896)     
|(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses                         | (25,867)         | (1,550)         | 5,789        
|(Decrease) increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 255,887          | (23,890)        | (1,305)      
|                                                                |                  |                 |              
|Net cash used in operating activities                           | (1,757,852)      | (1,166,330)     | (505,448)    
|                                                                |                  |                 |              
|                                                                |                  |                 |              
|CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES                            |                  |                 |              
|Proceeds from issuance of capital stock (Note 8)                | 11,826,329       | 424,200         | 2,098,350    
|Share issuance costs (Note 8)                                   | (573,165)        | -               | (54,403)     
|Net proceeds from sale of treasury stock (Note 11)              | 1,273,946        | -               | -            
|                                                                |                  |                 |              
|Net cash provided by financing activities                       | 12,527,110       | 424,200         | 2,043,947    
|                                                                |                  |                 |              
|                                                                |                  |                 |              
|CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES                            |                  |                 |              
|Acquisition of property and equipment                           | (291,877)        | (59,635)        | -            
|Investment in mineral properties                                | (2,197,611)      | -               | -            
|Proceeds from redemption of performance bond                    | -                | 891,908         | -            
|Purchase of performance bond                                    | -                | (1,035,060)     | -            
|Proceeds from reduction in performance bond                     | -                | -               | 75,942       
|                                                                |                  |                 |              
|Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities             | (2,489,488)      | (202,787)       | 75,942       
|                                                                |                  |                 |              
|Change in cash and cash equivalents                             | 8,279,770        | (944,917)       | 1,614,441    
|                                                                |                  |                 |              
|Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year                    | 891,548          | 1,836,465       | 222,024      
|                                                                |                  |                 |              
|Cash and cash equivalents, end of year                          | $      9,171,318 | $ 891,548       | $ 1,836,465  





Supplemental disclosure with respect to cash flows(Note 17)





The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



---

-91-





PETAQUILLA MINERALS LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

JANUARY 31, 2006





1.

NATURE OF OPERATIONS



The Company was incorporated in the Province of British Columbia and is in the business of the acquisition and exploration of resource properties and has not yet determined whether its properties contain ore reserves that are economically recoverable. To date, the Company has not earned significant revenues and is considered to be in the exploration stage.





At  January 31, 2006, the Company has working capital of $8,689,060 (2005 - $870,543). During the year, the Company raised funds from a private placement but will have to raise additional funds to undertake further exploration and subsequent development of its mineral properties. Management is pursuing additional sources of financing and while it has been successful in the past there can be no assurance that it will be able to do so in the future.





These consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which assumes the Company will be able to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business for the foreseeable future. These consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets and liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.





2.

SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES



These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles.  The significant accounting policies adopted by the Company are as follows:





Basis of consolidation





These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Petaquilla Minerals, S.A. (a Panama corporation), Adrian Resources (BVI) Ltd. (a British Virgin Island corporation), Georecursos Internacional, S.A. (Georecursos) (a Panama corporation), and Petaquilla Gold, S.A. (a Panama corporation). The Company proportionately consolidates its 52% interest in a joint venture investment, Minera Petaquilla S.A. (Minera Petaquilla) (a Panama corporation).





All significant inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated upon consolidation.





Use of estimates





The preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.





Cash and cash equivalents





Cash is comprised of cash on hand and demand deposits.



Cash equivalents are short-term, highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash and which are subject to an insignificant risk of change in value. To limit its credit risk exposure in excess of federally insured amounts, the Company places its deposits with financial institutions with high credit standing.



---

-92-





PETAQUILLA MINERALS LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

JANUARY 31, 2006





2.

SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES(contd)





Marketable securities





Marketable securities are carried at the lower of cost and quoted market value on an individual investment basis.







Property and equipment





Equipment is recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation, which is provided on computer equipment, computer software, equipment, furniture and fixtures, office equipment and vehicles on the declining balance basis at rates varying between 20% and 50% per annum. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the term of the lease.





Resource properties





Acquisition costs of resource properties, together with direct exploration and development expenditures incurred thereon, are deferred until the property to which they relate is placed into production, sold or abandoned. The carrying values of resource properties are, where necessary, written down to the estimated recoverable amount based on undiscounted estimated future net cash flows. Costs relating to properties abandoned are written off when the decision to abandon is made.





The Company follows the cost reduction method of accounting for the receipt of property option and similar payments.  Cash and other property payments received from the Companys exploration partners are credited to the respective property until capitalized costs are recovered; thereafter, such payments are included in income.  Option payments are exercisable at the discretion of the optionee and are only recognized when received.  Management fees earned for the management of properties are included in income.





On an annual basis, the Company reviews the carrying values of deferred resource property acquisition and exploration expenditures with a view to assessing whether there has been an impairment in value. In the event that management determines potential reserves to be insufficient to recover the carrying value of any property, the carrying value will be written down or written off, as appropriate.





During the year ended January 31, 2002, the Company wrote-off to operations its resource property costs related to the Ley Petaquilla property (Note 6). Accordingly, any subsequent resource property costs related to the Ley Petaquilla property have been expensed as incurred.



---

-93-





PETAQUILLA MINERALS LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

JANUARY 31, 2006





2.

SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES(contd)





Asset retirement obligations





An asset retirement obligation is a legal obligation associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets that the Company is required to settle. The Company recognizes the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation in the period in which it is incurred when a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The carrying amount of the related long-lived asset is increased by the same amount as the liability. To date, the Company has not incurred any asset retirement obligations.





Impairment of long-lived assets





A long-lived asset is tested for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognized when the carrying amount of a long-lived asset exceeds its fair value. For purposes of recognition and measurement of an impairment loss, a long-lived asset is grouped with other assets and liabilities to form an asset group, at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other assets and liabilities. Estimates of future cash flows used to test recoverability of a long-lived asset include only the future cash flows that are directly associated with, and that are expected to arise as a direct result of, its use and eventual disposition.





Foreign currency translation





Integrated foreign operations are translated using the temporal method. Under this method, monetary assets and liabilities are translated at the year-end exchange rate, non-monetary assets and liabilities are translated at rates prevailing at the respective transaction dates, and revenue and expenses are translated at rates approximating those in effect at the time of the transactions. Translation gains and losses are reflected in loss for the year.





Foreign currency denominated monetary accounts of the Company are translated at the year-end exchange rate.  Exchange gains and losses on translation are recognized as a gain or loss in the year they arise.





Loss per share



The Company uses the treasury stock method to compute the dilutive effect of options, warrants and similar instruments.  Under this method, the dilutive effect on loss per share is recognized on the use of the proceeds that could be obtained upon exercise of options, warrants and similar instruments.  It assumes that the proceeds would be used to purchase common shares at the average market price during the period.  For the years presented, this calculation proved to be anti-dilutive.  At January 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, the total number of potentially dilutive shares excluded from loss per share was 11,014,035, 9,924,296 and 10,889,291 respectively.





Basic loss per share is calculated using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year.



---

-94-





PETAQUILLA MINERALS LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

JANUARY 31, 2006





2.

SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES(contd)





Stock-based compensation



The Company uses the fair value method whereby the Company recognizes compensation costs for the granting of all stock options and direct awards of stock. Any consideration paid by the option holders to purchase shares is credited to capital stock.





Income taxes





Future income taxes are recorded using the asset and liability method under which future tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases.  Future tax assets and liabilities are measured using the enacted or substantively enacted tax rates expected to apply when the asset is realized or the liability settled.  The effect on future tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that substantive enactment or enactment occurs.  To the extent that the Company does not consider it more likely than not that a future tax asset will be recovered, it provides a valuation allowance against the excess.





Comparative figures





Certain comparative figures have been reclassified to conform with the current years presentation.





3.

MARKETABLE SECURITIES



The Company holds shares of certain publicly traded companies with a book value of $Nil (2005 - $Nil) and a market value of $15,375 (2005 - $37,419).



---

-95-





PETAQUILLA MINERALS LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

JANUARY 31, 2006





4.

INVESTMENT IN JOINT VENTURE



The Company owns a 52% joint venture interest in Minera Petaquilla, which is proportionately consolidated in the financial statements.  The Companys interest is summarized as follows:



|                                  | 2006        | 2005        
|--------------------------------- | ----------- | ------------
|ASSETS                            |             |             
|                                  |             |             
|Current assets                    |             |             
|Cash                              | $     5,907 | $   13,674  
|Due from shareholders             | -           | 6,324       
|Receivables                       | 5,671       | 6,826       
|Prepaid expenses                  | 2,357       | -           
|                                  |             |             
|                                  | $   13,935  | $    26,824 
|                                  |             |             
|LIABILITIES                       |             |             
|Current liabilities               | $    9,367  | $      3,561
|Other liabilities                 | 42,468      | 47,517      
|                                  |             |             
|SHAREHOLDERS DEFICIENCY          | (37,900)    | (24,254)    
|                                  |             |             
|                                  | $  13,935   | $   26,824  
|                                  |             |             
|Cash flows provided by (used in): |             |             
|Operating activities              | $ (104,780) | $ (125,278) 
|Financing activities              | 97,154      | 104,108     
|Investing activities              | -           | -           



The Companys share of Minera Petaquillas income (loss) for the years ended January 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 was $(108,074), $(95,051) and $2,913, respectively.



---

-96-





PETAQUILLA MINERALS LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

JANUARY 31, 2006





5.

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT



|                       |            | 2006                     |                |            | 2005                     |                | 
|---------------------- | ---------- | ------------------------ | -------------- | ---------- | ------------------------ | -------------- | 
|                       | Cost       | Accumulated
Depreciation | Net
Book Value | Cost       | Accumulated
Depreciation | Net
Book Value | 
|                       |            |                          |                |            |                          |                | 
|Computer equipment     | $ 127,650  | $    22,329              | $  105,321     | $   12,530 | $      2,202             | $   10,328     | 
|Computer software      | 20,418     | 3,754                    | 16,664         | -          | -                        | -              | 
|Equipment              | 74,173     | 15,045                   | 59,128         | 15,384     | 2,308                    | 13,076         | 
|Furniture and fixtures | 23,375     | 4,330                    | 19,045         | 10,780     | 1,078                    | 9,702          | 
|Leasehold improvements | 8,951      | 2,920                    | 6,031          | 7,781      | 778                      | 7,003          | 
|Office equipment       | 14,778     | 3,421                    | 11,357         | 10,796     | 1,080                    | 9,716          | 
|Vehicles               | 79,803     | 12,344                   | 67,459         | -          | -                        | -              | 
|                       |            |                          |                |            |                          |                | 
|                       | $  349,148 | $   64,143               | $  285,005     | $   57,271 | $     7,446              | $   49,825     | 





During the 2005 fiscal year, the Company wrote-off to operations certain property and equipment with a net book value of $44,855.





6.

MINERAL PROPERTIES



Ley Petaquilla Property- Panama



The Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiary Georecursos, owns 52% of Minera Petaquilla. Minnova (Panama) Inc. (Minnova), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Inmet Mining Corporation (Inmet), owns the remaining 48% of Minera Petaquilla, a company formed during 1997 to own the Ley Petaquilla mineral concession in Panama. Pursuant to the contract law under which the Petaquilla concession was granted by the Government of the Republic of Panama, the Company has delivered a phased Mine Development Plan to the Government of Panama which was approved in September 2005. Refer also to Molejon Property  Panama. This approval resulted in the extension of the land tenure for an initial 20 year period commencing on September 2005, subject to the Company meeting certain other development and operational conditions on an ongoing basis. Terms of the land tenure have two additional 20 year terms that are also subject to the Company meeting certain other ongoing development and operational conditions.





Teck Cominco Limited (Teck) has an option to acquire 50% of the Companys interest in Minera Petaquilla, which would result in Teck having a 26% interest in Minera Petaquilla. In order for Teck to acquire the 26% interest, it is required to:



(i)

Fund 52% of the continuing exploration expenditures, as defined, of Minera Petaquilla, with Minnova to fund its 48% share, until such time as Teck either acquires its interest or its interest is terminated.

(ii)

Fund 100% of and complete a final feasibility study, as defined, for the property and deliver such study by January 21, 1998 (completed).

(iii)

Arrange project financing for Minera Petaquilla for completion of development of the Ley Petaquilla property and, if necessary, fund 52% (Minnova to fund 48%) of any shortfall in the total project funding requirement in excess of arranged project financing.



---

-97-





PETAQUILLA MINERALS LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

JANUARY 31, 2006





6.

MINERAL PROPERTIES (contd)



Ley Petaquilla Property- Panama (contd)



Teck is committed to annually make a final commitment respecting development of the concession and to deliver an update to the feasibility study of the concession. The requirement to make a final commitment or give notice of unfavorable economic conditions within 90 days of delivery of the final feasibility study applies to all subsequent annual anniversaries. Failure to make such a commitment or deliver a notice shall result in the termination of Tecks right to acquire an interest in Minera Petaquilla.



In April 2005, the Company and Inmet agreed to waive for one year Tecks obligation to make a final commitment respecting development of the concession and to deliver an updated feasibility study. This waiver does not affect Tecks obligation to make a final commitment respecting development of the concession and to deliver an updated feasibility study in 2006.



Upon Teck making a final commitment, Minnova is required to deliver a final commitment to participate in the development of the project or it will be required to dispose of its interest in Minera Petaquilla. Minnova is then required to either offer to sell its interest in the concession or accept an 8% net profit interest, as defined, in the project. The offer to sell its interest shall be made first to the Company and then to Teck at a price to be determined by Minnova. In the event that neither the Company nor Teck chooses to acquire Minnovas interest, Minnova shall be entitled to seek an independent purchaser of its interest on terms no more favorable than those offered to the Company and Teck.



Either the Company or Minnova (the Proposer) may at any time give notice to the other parties of its intention to proceed with development of the concession in accordance with the most recently delivered Teck feasibility study. Upon receipt of such notice, Teck has 50 days in which to make a final commitment to develop the project. The other party, the Company or Minnova (the Recipient), has 60 days from the receipt of such notice to commit to develop the project.



If the Recipient has not agreed to develop the project, the Proposer may, within 70 days of the proposal, elect to exercise the Shotgun Offer, as defined, and either sell its interest or acquire the Recipients interest in Minera Petaquilla, for cash, based on the value of Minera Petaquilla as determined in accordance with the provisions of the agreement. The Recipient has 15 days from receipt of the Shotgun Offer to agree either to sell its interest or to acquire the Proposers interest as applicable, and in the event that the Recipient does not take action within the 15-day period, it will thereafter be deemed to have agreed to sell its interest in Minera Petaquilla.



If Minnova sells its interest, pursuant to the Shotgun Offer, the Company shall pay Minnova 48% of the value of Minera Petaquilla.



If the Company sells its interest, pursuant to the Shotgun Offer, it shall receive 29% of the value of Minera Petaquilla on condition that, in the event that Tecks interest in the concession is terminated, the Company shall receive an additional 23% of the value of Minera Petaquilla.



If Tecks interest in the concession is not terminated and the Company sells its interest, pursuant to the Shotgun Offer, the Company shall not be entitled to receive any further amount, in excess of the 29% of the value received on account of the sale of its interest in Minera Petaquilla.



Upon exercise of the Shotgun Offer, Teck has 130 days in which to deliver a final commitment for development of the concession or its interest shall be terminated.



---

-98-





PETAQUILLA MINERALS LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

JANUARY 31, 2006





6.

MINERAL PROPERTIES (contd)



Ley Petaquilla Property- Panama(contd)



Tecks interest in the concession shall terminate on the earlier of:



i)

Teck electing to terminate its interest provided it has delivered its final feasibility study, or



ii)

Tecks failure to deliver a final commitment requesting development of the concession and to deliver an updated feasibility study.



In the event that Tecks interest is terminated, Teck shall retain a net profit royalty interest in the project at a rate to be determined.





The Government of Panama passed legislation which significantly expands the size of the Panama Canal Watershed in general and, in particular, establishes an overlap of part of the Petaquilla concession.  It is possible that future construction of dams within the watershed area could negatively affect the development of the Ley Petaquilla property.





Molejon Property  Panama





In June 2005, the shareholders of Minera Petaquilla agreed to separate the gold deposit and other precious metal mineral deposits that might be developed within the Ley Petaquilla mineral concession from the copper mineral deposits within the Ley Petaquilla mineral concession. The agreement provides for the Company, through Petaquilla Gold, S.A., to own a 100% interest in the Molejon gold deposit, as well as all other gold and precious metal mineral deposits that might be developed within the Ley Petaquilla mineral concession, subject to a graduated 1% - 5% Net Smelter Return, based on the future gold price at the time of production, payable to Teck and Minova as to 35.135% and 64.865% respectively.



Approval of the phased Mine Development Plan was obtained in September 2005. Transfer of title to the Company of the Molejon gold mineral deposit, as well as the other rights as described above, is underway.



During the current fiscal year, the Company incurred the following costs related to the Molejon gold deposit. These costs have been capitalized on the Companys audited consolidated balance sheet as mineral property costs:



| | Trenching               |  | $            811,037 | 
| | ----------------------- |  | -------------------- | 
| | Administration support  |  | 352,250              | 
| | Road                    |  | 293,407              | 
| | Engineering and geology |  | 275,372              | 
| | Camp costs              |  | 197,300              | 
| | Assaying                |  | 167,434              | 
| | Drilling                |  | 106,842              | 
| | Permits and licences    |  | 81,097               | 
| | Data management         |  | 59,825               | 
| | Community service plan  |  | 45,205               | 
| |                         |  | $          2,389,769 | 



---

-99-





PETAQUILLA MINERALS LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

JANUARY 31, 2006





6.

MINERAL PROPERTIES (contd)



Mineral Properties - Other



The Company holds various interests in other land concession areas adjacent to the Ley Petaquilla Property in Panama, including the Rio Belencillo and Rio Petaquilla concessions.





By an Agreement dated May 7, 2005 and amended on June 10, 2005, Gold Dragon Capital Management Ltd. (Gold Dragon), has an option to purchase all of the Companys interest in the Rio Belencillo and Rio Petaquilla concessions by the expenditure of $100,000 in approved exploration costs by May 7, 2007, an additional $400,000 in approved exploration costs by February 7, 2008 and by then paying the Company $1,152,400. This sum is payable in shares of Gold Dragon.





7.

PERFORMANCE BOND  RESTRICTED CASH



The Company is required to post a performance bond of US$780,000 to maintain its interest in the Petaquilla property.  As at January 31, 2004, the Company fulfilled this requirement by holding a Republic of Panama Sovereign Bond (the Panama Bond) with a face value of US$750,000, which the Company had purchased earlier at a discount of US$630,000, and an additional one-year time deposit of US$31,175. The discount on the Panama Bond was being amortized to income over the original term of the bond. The Panama Bond was also returning a portion of its principal to the Company over the term of the loan. During the fiscal year ended January 31, 2005, the Panama Bond was redeemed early resulting in a gain of $198,142.  The Company has pledged a guaranteed investment certificate in the amount of US$780,000 as security for a letter of credit with the Bank of Nova Scotia to satisfy the requirements of the performance bond. The Canadian dollar equivalent of the US$780,000 investment is $892,242 as at January 31, 2006 after recognizing a foreign exchange loss of $73,813 from the January 31, 2005 balance of $966,055.



---

-100-





PETAQUILLA MINERALS LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

JANUARY 31, 2006





8.

CAPITAL STOCK AND CONTRIBUTED SURPLUS



|                                                         | Number
of Shares | Amount      | Contributed
Surplus
|-------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------- | ----------- | -------------------
|                                                         |                  |             |                    
|Issued                                                   |                  |             |                    
|                                                         |                  |             |                    
|Balance as at January 31, 2003                           | 33,340,543       | $48,842,442 | $48,290            
|Non-brokered private placement, net of finders fees (a) | 8,333,333        | 1,125,000   | -                  
|Non-brokered private placement, net of finders fees (b) | 6,666,666        | 900,000     | -                  
|Exercise of stock options                                | 489,000          | 87,850      | (14,500)           
|Finders fee warrants                                    | -                | -           | 51,563             
|Stock-based compensation                                 | -                | -           | 242,469            
|Share issuance costs                                     | -                | (105,966)   | -                  
|                                                         |                  |             |                    
|Balance as at January 31, 2004                           | 48,829,542       | 50,849,326  | 327,822            
|Exercise of stock options                                | 2,185,497        | 476,209     | (114,383)          
|Exercise of warrants                                     | 249,498          | 105,257     | (42,883)           
|Stock-based compensation                                 | -                | -           | 716,876            
|                                                         |                  |             |                    
|Balance as at January 31, 2005                           | 51,264,537       | 51,430,792  | 887,432            
|Non-brokered private placement, net of finders fees (c) | 9,965,670        | 8,933,334   | -                  
|Exercise of stock options                                | 1,465,600        | 713,008     | (241,690)          
|Exercise of warrants                                     | 7,550,496        | 1,939,187   | (51,563)           
|Stock-based compensation                                 | -                | -           | 410,301            
|Share issuance costs                                     | -                | (39,112)    | -                  
|                                                         |                  |             |                    
|Balance as at January 31, 2006                           | 70,246,303       | $62,977,209 | $1,004,480         
|                                                         |                  |             |                    



a)  In September 2003, the Company completed a non-brokered private placement and issued 8,333,333 units at a price of $0.15 per unit, for gross proceeds of $1,250,000. Each unit consisted of one common share and one-half of one non-transferable two-year share purchase warrant. Each whole warrant entitled the holder to purchase one additional common share of the Company at a price of $0.25 per share until September 24, 2005. The Company paid finders fees of $125,000 and issued 300,000 finders fee warrants, with a value of $51,563, entitling the holder to purchase one additional common share at a price of $0.25 per share until September 24, 2005.   The fair value of these finders fee warrants of $51,563 was determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model using a risk-free interest rate of 3%, an expected life of 2 years, an annualized volatility of 140%, and a dividend rate of 0%.



b)

In November  2003, the Company completed a non-brokered private placement and issued 6,666,666 units at a price of $0.15 per unit, for gross proceeds of $1,000,000. Each unit consisted of one common share and one-half of one non-transferable two-year share purchase warrant. Each whole warrant entitled the holder to purchase one additional common share of the Company at a price of $0.25 per share until November 18, 2005. The Company paid finders fees of $100,000.



---

-101-





PETAQUILLA MINERALS LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

JANUARY 31, 2006





8.

CAPITAL STOCK AND CONTRIBUTED SURPLUS(contd)



c)   In January 2006, the Company completed a non-brokered private placement and issued 9,965,670 units

at a  price of $0.95 per unit, for gross proceeds of $9,467,387. Each unit consists of one common share and one-half of one non-transferable share purchase warrant aggregating 4,982,835 warrants. Each whole warrant entitles the holder to purchase one common share of the Company at a price of $1.20 per share if exercised in the first year following the closing, and at a price of $1.44 per share if exercised in the second year following the closing. The warrant will terminate within 20 days unless exercised in the event the Companys closing stock price meets or exceeds $2.00 for 10 consecutive trading days and the Company issues a press release of such an event. The Company paid finders fees of $534,053 for net proceeds of $8,933,334.



d)  Net proceeds from issuance of capital stock of $11,292,276 is comprised of $8,933,334 for the non-  brokered private placement and $2,358,942 being the cash proceeds from the exercise of stock options and warrants.



e)  The shareholders of the Company had adopted a shareholder rights plan (the Plan), creating the potential for substantial dilution of an acquirers position except with respect to a permitted bid.  The Plan had a ten-year term and expired on April 28, 2005.



The Company has adopted a new shareholder rights plan, subject to regulatory and shareholder approval. Under the new Plan, the Company will issue one Right for no consideration for each outstanding common share of the Company to all holders of record of common shares as at 5:00 p.m., Pacific time, March 7, 2006. Thereafter, each common share issued by the Company during the term of the Plan will have one Right attached to it. The term of the Plan is five years unless the rights are earlier redeemed or exchanged. The Plan will be subject to review after the third year of its term.



The Rights are attached to the common shares and cannot be exercised until eight trading days after a triggering event has taken place. A triggering event is one of the following: (i) an Acquiring Person, as defined in the Plan, acquires 20% or more of the common shares of the Company; or (ii) an Acquiring Person announces his intention to make a take-over bid that would result in the person owning 20% or more of the outstanding common shares of the Company. Upon such a triggering event occurring, each Right would separate from the common share and thereafter entitle the holder to purchase common shares at 50% discount to the market price, up to the amount of the $30 exercise price of the Right.



The Rights will not be separated from the shares if the Acquiring Person makes a Permitted Bid, defined in the Plan to mean a bid made pursuant to a take-over bid circular to all shareholders of the Company, which has a minimum deposit period of at least 60 days and pursuant to which not less than 50% of the common shares, other than those held by the Acquiring Person, are deposited and not withdrawn.



---

-102-





PETAQUILLA MINERALS LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

JANUARY 31, 2006





9.

STOCK OPTIONS



The Company has a stock option plan which authorizes the board of directors to grant incentive stock options to directors, officers and employees whereby the maximum number of shares reserved for issuance under the Companys plan is 7,436,158 common shares of which 4,908,147 has been exercised, leaving 2,528,011 common shares available under the Plan.  The aggregate number of common shares reserved for issuance to any person may not exceed 5% of the number of outstanding common shares. The exercise price of the options will be determined by the fair market value of the shares at the closing price on the date prior to date of the grant. Options granted must be exercised no later than 10 years after the date of grant or such lesser period as may be determined by the Board. The Board may at its discretion in any granting of an option set a vesting period whereby the option may only be exercisable in pre-determined instalments.





Stock option transactions are summarized as follows:



|                                    | Number
of Shares | Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|----------------------------------- | ---------------- | -------------------------------
|Balance at January 31, 2003         | 2,398,297        | $    0.15                      
|Granted                             | 1,180,000        | 0.23                           
|Exercised                           | (489,000)        | 0.15                           
|Expired                             | -                | -                              
|Forfeited                           | -                | -                              
|                                    |                  |                                
|Balance at January 31, 2004         | 3,089,297        | 0.18                           
|Granted                             | 2,770,000        | 0.43                           
|Exercised                           | (2,185,497)      | 0.17                           
|Expired                             | -                | -                              
|Forfeited                           | (1,300,000)      | 0.41                           
|                                    |                  |                                
|Balance at January 31, 2005         | 2,373,800        | 0.36                           
|Granted                             | 5,573,000        | 0.53                           
|Exercised                           | (1,465,600)      | 0.32                           
|Expired                             | -                | -                              
|Forfeited                           | (450,000)        | 0.42                           
|                                    |                  |                                
|Balance at January 31, 2006         | 6,031,200        | $    0.53                      
|Number of stock options exercisable | 1,520,300        | $    0.50                      



The weighted average fair value of stock options granted during the year ended January 31, 2006 was $0.29 (2005 - $0.32; 2004 - $0.21) per option.



---

-103-





PETAQUILLA MINERALS LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

JANUARY 31, 2006





9.

STOCK OPTIONS (contd)





As at January 31, 2006, the following stock options were outstanding as follows:





|Number of Shares |                                     |                                              |                |                   
|---------------- | ----------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------- | -------------- | ------------------
|Granted          | Subject to Shareholder Approval (a) | Presently Authorized
Under Stock Option Plan | Exercise
Price | Expiry
Date       
|                 |                                     |                                              |                |                   
|250,000          | -                                   | 250,000                                      | $   0.50       | September 21, 2007
|42,400           | -                                   | 42,400                                       | 0.23           | September 24, 2008
|370,000          | -                                   | 370,000                                      | 0.42           | April 28, 2009    
|135,000          | -                                   | 135,000                                      | 0.50           | January 10, 2010  
|1,075,000        | 325,000                             | 750,000                                      | 0.50           | April 21, 2010    
|2,760,800        | 2,500,000                           | 260,800                                      | 0.50           | July 11, 2010     
|463,000          | 463,000                             | -                                            | 0.385          | August 23, 2010   
|150,000          | -                                   | 150,000                                      | 0.50           | September 13, 2010
|385,000          | -                                   | 385,000                                      | 0.62           | October 5, 2010   
|200,000          | 200,000                             | -                                            | 1.00           | December 31, 2010 
|200,000          | 200,000                             | -                                            | 1.00           | December 31, 2010 
|6,031,200        | 3,688,000                           | 2,343,200                                    |                |                   





(a)

Certain options, while granted by the board of directors, are subject to shareholder approval since they are in excess of the maximum number of shares reserved for issuance under the Companys stock option plan.





Totalstock options granted during the year ended January 31, 2006 are 5,573,000 (2005  2,770,000; 2004  1,180,000).  As described above, certain options granted are subject to shareholder approval and are not considered vested and exercisable for the purposes of recognizing stock-based compensation. Total stock-based compensation recognized for the fair value of stock options vested during the current fiscal year was $410,301 (2005 - $716,876; 2004  $242,469) which has been recorded in the consolidated statement of operations as stock-based compensation with corresponding contributed surplus recorded in shareholders equity.





Subsequent to January 31, 2006, an additional 2,930,000 stock options were granted subject to regulatory and shareholder approval.





---

-104-





PETAQUILLA MINERALS LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

JANUARY 31, 2006





9.

STOCK OPTIONS (contd)





The fair value of stock options granted is estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:



|                                | Year Ended
January 31,
2006 | Year Ended
January 31,
2005 | Year Ended
January 31,
2004
|------------------------------- | --------------------------- | --------------------------- | ---------------------------
|Risk-free interest              | 3.34  4.20 %               | 3.79%                       | 3.86%                      
|Expected dividend yield         | -                           | -                           | -                          
|Expected stock price volatility | 47% - 65%                   | 87%                         | 140%                       
|Expected option life in years   | 2 - 5 years                 | 5 years                     | 5 years                    





10.

SHARE PURCHASE WARRANTS





Share purchase warrant transactions are summarized as follows:



|                            | Number
of Shares | Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|--------------------------- | ---------------- | -------------------------------
|                            |                  |                                
|Balance at January 31, 2003 | -                | $            -                 
|                            |                  |                                
|Issued                      | 7,799,994        | 0.25                           
|Expired                     | -                | -                              
|                            |                  |                                
|Balance at January 31, 2004 | 7,799,994        | 0.25                           
|                            |                  |                                
|Issued                      | -                | -                              
|Exercised                   | (249,498)        | 0.25                           
|Expired                     | -                | -                              
|                            |                  |                                
|Balance at January 31, 2005 | 7,550,496        | 0.25                           
|                            |                  |                                
|Issued                      | 4,982,835        | 1.20/1.44                      
|Exercised                   | (7,550,496)      | 0.25                           
|Expired                     | -                | -                              
|                            |                  |                                
|Balance at January 31, 2006 | 4,982,835        | $   1.20/1.44                  







---

-105-





PETAQUILLA MINERALS LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

JANUARY 31, 2006





10.

SHARE PURCHASE WARRANTS(contd)





As at January 31, 2006, the following share purchase warrants were outstanding and exercisable as follows:



|Number
of Shares | Exercise
Price | Expiry
Date       | 
|---------------- | -------------- | ----------------- | 
|                 |                |                   | 
|4,028,930        | $ 1.20         | December 19, 2006 | 
|                 | then at $ 1.44 | December 19, 2007 | 
|185,000          | $ 1.20         | December 22, 2006 | 
|                 | then at $ 1.44 | December 22, 2007 | 
|768,905          | $ 1.20         | January 6, 2007   | 
|                 | then at $ 1.44 | January 6, 2008   | 
|4,982,835        |                |                   | 



These warrants will terminate within 20 days unless exercised in the event the Companys closing stock price meets or exceeds $2.00 for 10 consecutive trading days and the Company issues a press release of such an event.





11.

TREASURY STOCK



During the current year, the Company sold 1,616,000 of its shares held in treasury at an average price of $0.79 per share for proceeds of $1,273,946. These shares were previously issued and reacquired at a cost of $3.79 per share by the Company some years ago pursuant to an issuer bid. The loss of $4,847,462 resulting from the sale of these shares and related broker fees has been charged to deficit in the current year.





12.

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS





During the year ended January 31, 2006:



b)

The Company paid consulting fees of $114,559 (2005 - $96,780; 2004 - $34,833) to companies controlled by a director and a former director.



c)

The Company paid wages and benefits of $230,525 (2005 - $207,068; 2004 - $44,272) to directors and an officer.



d)

The Company paid rent expense of $Nil (2005 - $17,816; 2004 - $11,215) to a company controlled by a director and to a company related by virtue of former common directors.  The Company received $9,446 (2005 - $Nil; 2004 - $Nil) for rent charges from a company with a common director.



e)

The Company paid legal fees of $Nil (2005 - $21,433; 2004 - $108,037) to a law firm controlled by a former director, of which $Nil (2005 - $Nil; 2004 - $47,569) was recorded as share issue costs.





---

-106-





PETAQUILLA MINERALS LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

JANUARY 31, 2006





12.

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS(contd)



e)

The Company paid $61,749 (2005 - $Nil; 2004 - $Nil) for equipment and supplies to a company controlled by a director.



Included in accounts payable at January 31, 2006 is $1,241 (2005 - $36,458) due to directors, a former director, and to companies related by virtue of common directors.





These transactions are in the normal course of operations and are measured at the exchange amount, which is the amount of consideration established and agreed to by the related parties.





13.

INCOME TAXES





A reconciliation of income taxes of statutory rates with the reported taxes is as follows:



|                                                               | 2006             | 2005             | 2004            
|-------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------- | ---------------- | ----------------
|                                                               |                  |                  |                 
|Statutory tax rate                                             | 34.7%            | 35.6%            | 37.6%           
|                                                               |                  |                  |                 
|Loss for the year                                              | $(2,567,758)     | $(1,798,273)     | $(811,190)      
|                                                               |                  |                  |                 
|Expected income tax recovery                                   | 892,168          | $640,185         | $305,007        
|Permanent and other differences                                | (117,045)        | (307,836)        | (91,172)        
|Differences in foreign tax rates                               | (14,107)         | (4,558)          | (12,305)        
|Losses for which an income tax benefit has
not been recognized | (761,016)        | (327,791)        | (201,530)       
|                                                               |                  |                  |                 
|                                                               | $              - | $              - | $              -



The significant components of the Companys future income tax assets are as follows:



|                                          | 2006               | 2005             
|----------------------------------------- | ------------------ | -----------------
|Future income tax assets                  |                    |                  
|Non-capital and other loss carry-forwards | $   1,409,133      | $  1,069,362     
|Equipment and exploration properties      | 247,380            | 247,218          
|Investments                               | -                  | 2,587,307        
|Share issuance costs                      | 156,445            | 4,852            
|                                          |                    |                  
|Total future income tax assets            | 1,812,958          | 3,908,739        
|Valuation allowance                       | (1,812,958)        | (3,908,739)      
|                                          |                    |                  
|Net future income tax assets              | $                - | $               -



---

-107-





PETAQUILLA MINERALS LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

JANUARY 31, 2006





13.

INCOME TAXES (contd)





The Company has non-capital losses of approximately $3,200,000 available for deduction against future years taxable income in Canada.  These losses, if unutilized, will expire up to 2016.  Subject to certain restrictions, the Company also has approximately $211,000 of resource expenditures available to reduce taxable income of future years in Canada plus resource related deductions available to reduce future taxable income in Panama.    The future tax benefits which may arise as a result of these non-capital losses and resource expenditures have not been recognized in these consolidated financial statements and have been offset by a valuation allowance.





14.

COMMITMENTS



During the year ended January 31, 2005, the Company entered into a five-year lease for office premises at an estimated annual cost of $63,176 commencing June 2004. The Company also entered into a 45-month lease for additional office premises at an estimated annual cost of $29,434 commencing on September 1, 2005.



Subsequent to January 31, 2006, the Company entered into a five-year lease for office premises at an estimated annual cost of  $61,112 commencing September 1, 2006. Cancellation of the above two previous lease obligations was obtained effective May 15, 2006.





15.

FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS



The Company's financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, receivables, performance bond, accounts payable and other accrued liabilities.  Unless otherwise noted, it is management's opinion that the Company is not exposed to significant interest or credit risks arising from these financial instruments.  The fair value of these financial instruments approximates their carrying values, unless otherwise noted.



The Company is subject to financial risk arising from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. The Company does not use any derivative instruments or hedging activities to reduce its exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.



---

-108-





PETAQUILLA MINERALS LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

JANUARY 31, 2006





16.

SEGMENT INFORMATION





The Company has one operating segment being the exploration of resource properties.  Details of geographic information are as follows:



|2006                   | Canada      | Panama          | Total      
|---------------------- | ----------- | --------------- | -----------
|                       |             |                 |            
|Interest income        | $    48,239 | $             - | $    48,239
|                       |             |                 |            
|Property and equipment | $    45,970 | $  239,035      | $   285,005
|Mineral properties     | -           | 2,389,769       | 2,389,769  



|2005                   | Canada      | Panama        | Total       
|---------------------- | ----------- | ------------- | ------------
|                       |             |               |             
|Interest income        | $    17,956 | $         310 | $    18,266 
|                       |             |               |             
|Property and equipment | $    30,782 | $    19,043   | $     49,825



|2004                   | Canada       | Panama           | Total      
|---------------------- | ------------ | ---------------- | -----------
|                       |              |                  |            
|Interest income        | $    12,373  | $    45,591      | $    57,964
|                       |              |                  |            
|Property and equipment | $     42,705 | $              - | $    42,705





17.

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE WITH RESPECT TO CASH FLOWS



|                                                 | 2006                | 2005            | 2004        
|------------------------------------------------ | ------------------- | --------------- | ------------
|                                                 |                     |                 |             
|Non-cash financing activities                    |                     |                 |             
|Finders fee warrants                            | $                 - | $             - | $     51,563
|Share issue costs                                | -                   | -               | (51,563)    
|                                                 |                     |                 |             
|Non-cash investing activities                    |                     |                 |             
|Mineral property costs incurred through payables | 192,158             | -               | -           



|                                      |  | 2006          | 2005         
|------------------------------------- |  | ------------- | -------------
|                                      |  |               |              
|Cash and cash equivalents consist of: |  |               |              
|Cash                                  |  | $   1,420,258 | $     891,548
|Term deposits                         |  | 7,751,060     | -            



---

-109-





PETAQUILLA MINERALS LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

JANUARY 31, 2006





18.

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS





Subsequent to January 31, 2006:



a)

The Company issued 346,300 shares on the exercise of stock options for proceeds of $170,666.

b)

The Company granted 2,930,000 stock options subject to regulatory and shareholder approval.





19.

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CANADIAN AND UNITED STATES GENERALLY ACCEPTED

ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES





These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in Canada (Canadian GAAP).  Material variations in the accounting principles, practices and methods used in preparing these financial statements from principles, practices and methods accepted in the United States (U.S. GAAP) are described and quantified below.





Loss for the year



|                                                    | 2006               | 2005               | 2004           
|--------------------------------------------------- | ------------------ | ------------------ | ---------------
|                                                    |                    |                    |                
|Loss for the year - Canadian GAAP                   | $   (2,567,758)    | $   (1,798,273)    | $    (811,190) 
|Mineral properties expensed under U.S. GAAP (a)     | (2,389,769)        | -                  | -              
|Loss for the year - U.S. GAAP                       | (4,957,527)        | (1,798,273)        | (811,190)      
|Holding gains (losses) on marketable securities (b) | (22,044)           | (7,587)            | 45,006         
|                                                    |                    |                    |                
|Comprehensive loss - U.S. GAAP                      | $   (4,979,571)    | $  (1,805,860)     | $   (766,184)  
|                                                    |                    |                    |                
|Basic and diluted loss per share - U.S. GAAP        | $           (0.09) | $           (0.04) | $        (0.02)





---

-110-





PETAQUILLA MINERALS LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

JANUARY 31, 2006





19.

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CANADIAN AND UNITED STATES GENERALLY ACCEPTED

ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES (contd)



|                                           |  | 2006            | 2005       
|------------------------------------------ |  | --------------- | -----------
|                                           |  |                 |            
|Current assets                             |  |                 |            
|Current assets - Canadian GAAP             |  | $     9,240,156 | $
973,594  
|Cumulative adjustments:                    |  |                 |            
|Holding gains on marketable securities (b) |  | 15,375          | 37,419     
|                                           |  |                 |            
|Current assets - U.S. GAAP                 |  | $     9,255,531 | $
1,011,013





|                                                |  | 2006                  | 2005
|----------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------- | ----
|                                                |  |                       |     
|Mineral properties                              |  |                       |     
|Mineral properties - Canadian GAAP              |  | $     2,389,769       | $
- 
|Mineral properties expensed under U.S. GAAP (a) |  | (2,389,769)           | -   
|                                                |  |                       |     
|Mineral properties - U.S. GAAP                  |  | $                   - | $
- 





|                                           |  | 2006            | 2005           
|------------------------------------------ |  | --------------- | ---------------
|                                           |  |                 |                
|Shareholders equity                       |  |                 |                
|                                           |  |                 |                
|Shareholders equity - Canadian GAAP       |  | $   12,256,076  | $
1,886,423    
|Cumulative adjustments:                    |  |                 |                
|Mineral properties (a)                     |  | (2,389,769)     | -              
|Holding gains on marketable securities (b) |  | 15,375          | 37,419         
|                                           |  |                 |                
|Shareholders equity - U.S. GAAP           |  | $     9,881,682 | $     1,923,842



---

-111-





PETAQUILLA MINERALS LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

JANUARY 31, 2006





19.

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CANADIAN AND UNITED STATES GENERALLY ACCEPTED

ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES (contd)



|                                                     | 2006              | 2005              | 2004              
|---------------------------------------------------- | ----------------- | ----------------- | ------------------
|                                                     |                   |                   |                   
|Statement of Cash Flows                              |                   |                   |                   
|                                                     |                   |                   |                   
|Cash flows from operating activities - Canadian GAAP | $    (1,757,852)  | $       (505,448) | $         (57,045)
|Expenditures on mineral properties                   | (2,197,611)       | -                 | -                 
|Cash flows from operating activities - U.S. GAAP     | $    (3,955,463)  | $       (505,448) | $         (57,045)
|                                                     |                   |                   |                   
|Cash flows from investing activities - Canadian GAAP | $    (2,489,488)  | $       (202,787) | $           75,942
|Expenditures on mineral properties                   | 2,197,611         | -                 | -                 
|Cash
flows from investing activities - U.S. GAAP     | $       (291,877) | $       (202,787) | $           75,942



a)

Mineral properties and deferred costs



Mineral property costs and related exploration expenditures are accounted for in accordance with Canadian GAAP as disclosed in Note 2.  For U.S. GAAP purposes, the Company expenses, as incurred, the exploration costs relating to unproven mineral properties. When proven and probable reserves are determined for a property and a feasibility study is prepared, then subsequent exploration and development costs of the property would be capitalized. The capitalized costs of such properties is measured periodically for recoverability of carrying values.



b)

Marketable securities





Under Canadian GAAP, the marketable securities held by the Company are recorded at the lower of cost and quoted market value. Under U.S. GAAP, these investments are classified as available-for-sale securities and recorded at market value. The accumulated difference between cost and market value is recorded as part of comprehensive income.



c)

Stock-based compensation





Under U.S. GAAP, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 Accounting for Stock-based Compensation (SFAS 123) requires companies to establish a fair market value based method of accounting for stock-based compensation plans.  The Company elected for the year ended January 31, 2004 and subsequent years to account for stock-based compensation using SFAS 123 on a prospective basis. Accordingly, compensation cost for stock options is measured at the fair value of options granted.





---

-112-





PETAQUILLA MINERALS LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

JANUARY 31, 2006





19.

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CANADIAN AND UNITED STATES GENERALLY ACCEPTED

ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES (contd)



c)

Stock-based compensation (contd)







Under Canadian GAAP, the Company accounts for stock-based compensation using the fair value method (Note 2). Accordingly, there is no difference between Canadian GAAP and U.S. GAAP on the accounting for stock-based compensation for the years ended January 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004.





d)

Recent accounting pronouncements





In December 2004, FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share Based Payment (SFAS 123R). SFAS 123R supersedes APB 25 and its related implementation guidance by requiring entities to recognize the cost of employee services received in exchange for awards of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of those awards (with limited exceptions) and revises SFAS 123 as follows:



i.

Public entities are required to measure liabilities incurred to employees in share-based payment transactions at fair value and nonpublic entities may elect to measure their liabilities to employees incurred in share-based payment transactions at their intrinsic value whereas under SFAS 123, all share-based payment liabilities were measured at their intrinsic value.



ii.

Nonpublic entities are required to calculate fair value using an appropriate industry sector index for the expected volatility of its share price if it is not practicable to estimate the expected volatility of the entitys share price.



iii.

Entities are required to estimate the number of instruments for which the requisite service is expected to be rendered as opposed to accounting for forfeitures as they occur.



iv.

Incremental compensation cost for a modification of the terms or conditions of an award is measured by comparing the fair value of the modified award with the fair value of the award immediately before the modification whereas SFAS 123 required that the effects of a modification be measured as the difference between the fair value of the modified award at the date it is granted and the awards value immediately before the modification determined based on the shorter of (1) its remaining initially estimated expected life or (2) the expected life of the modified award.





SFAS 123R also clarifies and expands guidance in several areas, including measuring fair value, classifying an award as equity or as a liability and attributing compensation cost to reporting periods. SFAS 123R does not change the accounting guidance for share-based payment transactions with parties other than employees provided in SFAS 123 as originally issued in EITF 96-18. SFAS 123R also does not address the accounting for employee share ownership plans which are subject to Statement of Position 93-6, Employers Accounting for Employee Stock Ownership Plans. Public entities (other than those filing as small business issuers) will be required to apply SFAS 123R as of the first annual reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005. Public entities that file as small business issuers will be required to apply SFAS 123R in the first annual reporting period that begins after December 15, 2005. For non-public entities, SFAS 123R must be applied as of the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2005.



---

-113-





PETAQUILLA MINERALS LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

JANUARY 31, 2006





19.

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CANADIAN AND UNITED STATES GENERALLY ACCEPTED

ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES (contd)



d)

Recent accounting pronouncements (contd)





In May 2005, FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 154 Accounting Changes and Error Corrections  A Replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3 (SFAS 154), which is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005. SFAS 154 requires that changes in accounting policy be accounted for on a retroactive basis.





The adoption of these new pronouncements is not expected to have a material effect on the Companys consolidated financial position or results of operations



































---

-114-



Exhibit 8

Subsidiaries of Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.

The following is a list of our subsidiaries, ownership percentages, and the jurisdictions of incorporation or organization of each as of May 3, 2006.  Each subsidiary does business in its own name only.

|Subsidiary                              | Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization
|--------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------
|                                        |                                              
|Petaquilla Copper Ltd. (100%)           | British Columbia                             
|Adrian Resources (BVI) Ltd. (100%)      | British Virgin Islands                       
|Petaquilla Minerals, S.A. (100%)        | Panama                                       
|Petaquilla Gold, S.A. (100%)            | Panama                                       
|Compania Minera Belencillo, S.A. (100%) | Panama                                       
|Georecursos Internacional, S.A. (100%)  | Panama                                       
|Minera Petaquilla, S.A. (52%)           | Panama                                       





---

-115-



Exhibit 11.A



PETATQUILLA MINERALS LTD.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
POLICIES

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES

The Board of Directors of Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. (the "Board"), upon the recommendation of its Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (the "NCG"), has developed these Corporate Governance Guidelines (the "Guidelines") to promote the effective functioning of the Board and its committees and to set forth a common set of expectations as to how the Board should manage its affairs and perform its responsibilities.  These guidelines should be interpreted in accordance with any requirement imposed by applicable laws, rules or regulation, the Toronto Stock Exchange ("TSX"), and NASD, as well as the Articles of Incorporation and bylaws of Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.  The Board may review and amend these guidelines from time to time.

1.  NOMINATING & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, BOARD COMPOSITION & SELECTION

(a)

Board Size

The shareholders, at the Company's Annual General Meeting elected four directors.  The specific number of directors will be determined from time to time by the Board of Directors, and approved by the Shareholders of the Company.

(b)

Selection of New Directors

The Board has delegated to the NCG the responsibility of identifying suitable candidates for nomination to the Board (including candidates to fill any vacancies that may occur) and assessing their qualifications in light of the policies and principles in these Guidelines and the NCG's charter.  The NCG will recommend prospective director candidates for the Board's consideration and review the prospective candidates' qualifications with the Board.  The Board shall retain the ultimate authority to nominate a candidate for election by the shareholders as a Director or to fill any vacancy on the Board that may occur.  In identifying prospective Director candidates, the NCG may consider facts and circumstances that it deems appropriate or advisable, including, among other things, the skills of the prospective Director candidate, his or her depth and breadth of business experience or other background characteristics, his or her independence and the needs of the Board.  The Board shall consider and approve from time to time the criteria that it deems necessary or advisable for prospective Director candidates.  The Board shall have full authority to modify such criteria from time to time, as it deems necessary or advisable.

Directors are elected annually by Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.'s shareholders or, if applicable, at a special meeting of shareholders.  In the case of a vacancy in the office of a Director (including a vacancy created by an increase in the size of the Board of Directors), the NCG shall recommend to the Board of Directors an individual to fill such vacancy either through appointment by the Board of Directors or through election by shareholders.  Any Directors appointed by the Board will serve only until the next annual meeting unless re-elected by the shareholders at that time.



---

-116-





At least annually, the Board will evaluate all relationships between Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. and each Director in light of relevant facts and circumstances for the purposes of determining whether a material relationship exists that might signal a potential conflict of interest or otherwise interfere with such Director's ability to satisfy his or her responsibilities as an unrelated and independent Director, as such terms are used by applicable TSX and NASD rules and other applicable legislation.  At least a majority of the members of the Board shall meet the requirements of being both "unrelated" for the purposes of compliance with TSX corporate governance guidelines and "independent" for the purposes of complying with the standards of the NASD.

(c)

Director Orientation

The NCG will establish an orientation and education program for new directors, including providing background materials on Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. and its business.  The NCG will also establish a continuing education program for all directors on matters relevant to Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. and its business.

2.  FUNCTIONING OF THE BOARD

(a)

Number and Schedule of Meetings

The Board meets at least once each calendar quarter and following the annual meeting of Shareholders of Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.  The frequency of the meetings and the nature of the meeting agendas are dependent upon the nature of the business and affairs which Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. faces from time to time.

(b)

Agenda

The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Lead Director will establish the agenda for each regularly scheduled Board meeting, giving consideration to any suggestions from other members of the Board.  Any director may suggest agenda items and may raise at meetings other matters that they consider worthy of discussion.

(c)

Distribution of Materials

Directors are expected to spend the time reasonably needed or appropriate to discharge their responsibilities.  The agenda and the related information and data that is important to the Board's understanding of the business to be discussed for each regularly scheduled meeting and, where feasible, each special meeting of the entire Board or one of its committees, as applicable, will be distributed sufficiently in advance of the meeting to provide a reasonable opportunity for review by each Director, except when such material is too sensitive to be put in writing.

(d)

Attendance

Directors should make reasonable efforts to attend all meetings of the Board of Directors and of all Board committees upon which they serve.  Although the Board recognizes that, on occasion, circumstances may prevent directors from attending meetings, directors are expected to ensure that other commitments do not materially interfere with the performance of their duties.  Subject to extenuating circumstances (such as illness, for example), directors are expected to participate in a minimum of 66% of regularly scheduled Board and committee meetings.  Directors should also make reasonable efforts to attend the annual meeting of shareholders of Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.

(e)

Independent Director Sessions

The Board of Directors of Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. will schedule regular independent director sessions (incamera) at least quarterly at which the non-management directors (i.e. directors who are not Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. officers, or those who have a material relationship with an Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. officer) meet separately.  The Lead Director will preside at each session of the independent directors.



---

-117-





(f)

Access to Management and Advisors

Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. will provide directors with complete access to the management of Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.  The Board of Directors and Board committees have the right to consult and retain independent legal and other advisors at the expense of Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.  The Board, and each committee thereof, shall have the authority to request that any officer or employee of Petaquilla Minerals Ltd., Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.'s outside legal counsel, Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.'s independent auditor or any other professional retained by Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. to render advice to Petaquilla Minerals Ltd., attend a meeting of the Board, or such committee, or meet with any members of or advisors to the Board.  Directors are entitled to reasonably rely on advice from outside advisors such as lawyers, accountants, engineers or other persons whose profession lends credibility to a statement by such person.  Directors should assess the qualifications of any such advisors and the processes such advisors use to reach their decisions and recommendations.

(g)

Board Leadership

The Board reserves the right to determine, from time to time, how to configure the leadership of the Board and Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. in the way that best serves Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.

3.  DIRECTOR RESPONSIBILITIES

(a)

Management Oversight

The Board is responsible for supervising the management of the business and affairs of Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.  The Board has delegated the power to manage the everyday business and affairs of Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. to the officers of Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.  The Board has an oversight role and is not expected to perform or duplicate the tasks of the Chief Executive Officer or other members of management.

(b)

Duties

Directors should exercise their business judgment to act in what they reasonably believe to be in the best interests of Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. in a manner consistent with their fiduciary duties.  In particular, directors are required to act honestly and in good faith, with a view to the best interests of Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. and to exercise the care, diligence and skill that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in comparable circumstances.

(c)

Contact with Analysts, Investors and the Media

Directors, officers and employees who are not authorized spokespersons must not communicate information regarding Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. to the investment community, the media or others, unless specifically requested to do so by an authorized spokesperson.  Directors, officers and employees receiving inquiries from analysts, investors, the media or others should refer them to the Chief Executive Officer or another authorized spokesperson.

(d)

Conduct and Ethics Standards for Directors

Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.  Management and Directors are required to comply with such Code.

4.  COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD

The Board may establish such committees as it deems appropriate and delegate to such committees such authority permitted by applicable law, Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.'s articles and its by-laws as the Board sees fit.  The committees will operate in accordance with applicable law, their respective mandates as adopted and amended from time to time by the Board, and the applicable rules of applicable securities regulatory authorities and stock exchanges.



---

-118-





Currently, the Board has an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.  Each of these standing committees has a written charter that sets forth the responsibilities of such committee and the qualifications for committee membership.

5.  COMPENSATION

The Compensation Committee will make recommendations to the full Board of Directors relating to compensation of the members of the Board.  Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. recognizes that it is important to set director compensation at an appropriate level so that it does not compromise any director's independence and Directors' compensation will be determined based on this principle.  The form and amount of Director compensation will be reviewed periodically, but at least annually, by the Compensation Committee, which shall make recommendations to the Board based on such review.  The Board shall retain the ultimate authority to determine the form and amount of Director compensation.

6.  ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE BOARD AND COMMITTEES

The Board will conduct a self-evaluation at least annually for the purpose of determining whether it and its committees are functioning effectively.  Each committee of the Board will conduct a self-evaluation at least annually for the purpose of determining whether it is functioning effectively and produce a written report to the Board concerning this evaluation.  The NCG will oversee the evaluation process.

7.  MISCELLANEOUS

These guidelines are not intended to modify, extinguish or in any other manner limit the indemnification, exculpation and similar rights available to the Directors of Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. under applicable law and/or the Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.'s articles and/or its by-laws.  Although these corporate governance guidelines have been approved by the Board, it is expected that these guidelines will evolve over time as customary practice and legal requirements change.  In particular, guidelines that encompass legal, regulatory or exchange requirements, as they currently exist, will be deemed to be modified as and to the extent such legal, regulatory or exchange requirements are modified.  In addition, the guidelines may also be amended by the Board at any time as it deems appropriate.

CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS (THE "CODE")

Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. (together with all of its direct and indirect subsidiaries and affiliates) has created this Code to outline principles to which Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.'s employees, officers and directors are expected to adhere in the conduct of Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.'s business.  This Code sets forth principles regarding responsibilities to other employees, the public and other stakeholders.  Any violations of this Code or any other policies established by Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. from time to time, may result in disciplinary action, up to and including termination of service.

The Corporation's Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (the "Committee"), a committee of the Board is responsible for administering the Code.  The Committee has delegated a day-to-day responsibility for administering and interpreting the Code to a Compliance Officer.  Our Vice President, Legal has been appointed Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.'s Compliance Officer under this Code.

Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. expects its directors, officers and employees to exercise reasonable judgment when conducting Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.'s business.  Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. encourages its directors, officers and employees to refer to this Code frequently to ensure that they are acting within both the letter and the spirit of this Code.  Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. also understands that this Code will not contain the answer to every situation you may encounter or every concern you may have about conducting Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.'s business ethically and legally.  In these situations, or if you otherwise have questions or concerns about this Code, Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. encourages each officer and employee to speak with his or her supervisor (if applicable) or, if you are uncomfortable doing that, with the Compliance Officer under this Code.



---

-119-





Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.'s directors, officers and employees generally have other legal and contractual obligations to Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.  This Code is not intended to reduce or limit the other obligations that you may have with Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.  Instead, the standards in this Code should be viewed as the minimum standards that Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. expects from its directors, officers and employees in the conduct of Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.'s business.

1.  CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

All Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. employees, officers and directors must act with honesty and integrity, avoiding conflicts of interest in relation to their duties and responsibilities with Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. that arise as a result of either personal or professional relationships.

Conflicts of interest are prohibited as a matter of Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. policy.  Each employee, officer and director is expected to avoid an outside activity, financial interest or relationship that may present a conflict of interest or the appearance of a conflict of interest.  Each individual's situation is different and in evaluating his or her own situation, a director, officer or employee will have to consider many factors.  A transaction or relationship that reasonably could be expected to give rise to a conflict of interest should be reported to the Compliance Officer.  The Compliance Officer may notify the Board or the Committee as he or she deems appropriate.  Each person is required to promptly disclose any actual or potential conflict of interest to his or her manager or the Compliance Officer.  Actual or potential conflicts of interests involving a director, executive officer or the Compliance Officer should be disclosed directly to the Chairman of the Board or to the Lead Director.

A "conflict of interest" exists when a person's private interest interferes or even appears to interfere, with the interests of Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.  A conflict situation can arise when an employee, officer or director takes actions or has interests, responsibilities or obligations that may make it difficult to perform his or her responsibilities for Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. objectively and effectively.

2.  CORPORATE OPPORTUNITIES

All Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. employees, officers and directors are prohibited from:

(a)

taking for themselves personally opportunities that are discovered through the use of corporate property, information or as a result of his or her position with Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. unless such opportunity has first been presented to, and rejected by, Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.;

(b)

using corporate property, information or position for personal gain; and

(c)

competing with Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.

Employees, officers and directors owe a duty to Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. to advance its legitimate interests when the opportunity arises to do so.

3.  CONFIDENTIALITY

Certain employees, officers and directors will have access to confidential information in the course of their duties.  "Confidential Information" includes all non-public information that might be of use to competitors or harmful to Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. or its customers if disclosed.  All such Confidential Information remains the property of Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. at all times and should be kept in strict confidence by employees, officers and directors, except when disclosure is authorized or legally mandated.  Any disclosure of such Confidential Information to persons outside Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. could be harmful to Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.'s interests and will be taken very seriously by Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.



---

-120-





Employees, officers and directors should be aware that their obligation to maintain the confidentiality of Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.'s Confidential Information will survive after they leave Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. and should conduct themselves accordingly.  It is Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.'s policy to vigorously pursue all breaches of confidentiality and all necessary steps will be taken and all legal remedies exercised to prevent employees or former employees from breaching this obligation.

4.  FAIR DEALING

All purchases of goods and services by Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. will be made exclusively on the basis of price, quality, service and suitability to our needs.  Employees, officers or directors are prohibited from accepting gifts of money or receiving any type of personal kickbacks, rebates or other "under-the-table" payments.  Employees, officers and directors may accept unsolicited non-monetary gifts provided they are appropriate and customary client development gifts for the industry.  No one shall make any form of payment, direct or indirect, to any public official as inducement to procuring or keeping business or having a law or regulation enacted, defeated, or violated.  Directors, officers and employees must endeavour to deal ethically and lawfully with Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.'s customers, suppliers, competitors and employees in all business dealings on Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.'s behalf.  No director, officer or employee should take unfair advantage of another person in business dealings on Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.'s behalf through the abuse of privileged or confidential information or through improper manipulation, concealment or misrepresentation of material facts.

5.  PROTECTION AND PROPER USE OF COMPANY ASSETS

All Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. employees, officers and directors are expected to protect Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.'s assets and ensure their efficient use, as loss, theft and misuse of Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.'s assets have a direct impact on Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.'s business and its profitability.  Theft, carelessness and waste have a direct impact on Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.'s profitability.  All of Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.'s assets should only be used for legitimate business purposes.

6.  COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS, RULES AND REGULATIONS

Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. seeks to conduct its business in compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations including, without limitation, insider trading, antitrust, environmental, discrimination and harassment, and health and safety.  No director, officer or employee shall engage in any unlawful activity in conducting Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.'s business or in performing his or her day-to-day company duties, nor shall any director, officer or employee instruct others to do so.

7.  ACCURACY OF COMPANY RECORDS AND REPORTING

Honest and accurate recording and reporting of information is critical to Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.'s ability to make responsible business decisions.  Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.'s accounting records are relied upon to produce reports for Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.'s management, shareholders, creditors, governmental agencies and others.  Our financial statements and the books and records on which they are based must accurately reflect all corporate transactions and conform to all legal and accounting requirements and Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.'s system of internal controls.

Directors, officers and employees have a responsibility to ensure that Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.'s accounting records do not contain any false or intentionally misleading entries.  Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. does not permit intentional misclassification of transactions as to accounts, departments or accounting periods.  All transactions must be supported by accurate documentation in reasonable detail and recorded in the proper account and in the proper accounting period.

Business records and communications often become public through legal or regulatory investigations or the media.  All employees should avoid exaggeration, derogatory remarks, legal conclusions or inappropriate characterizations of people and companies.  This applies to communications of all kinds, including email and informal notes or interoffice memos.



---

-121-





8.  QUALITY OF PUBLIC DISCLOSURES

Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. is committed to providing its shareholders with complete and accurate information about its financial condition and results of operations as required by applicable securities laws of Canada and the United States.  It is Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.'s policy that the reports and documents it files with or submits to securities regulators in both Canada and the United States, and its earnings releases and similar public communications made by Petaquilla Minerals Ltd., include fair, timely and understandable disclosure.  Officers and employees who are responsible for these filings and disclosures, including Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.'s principal executive, financial and accounting officers, must use reasonable judgment and perform their responsibilities honestly, ethically and objectively in order to ensure that this disclosure policy is fulfilled.  Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.'s senior management are primarily responsible for monitoring Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.'s public disclosure.

9.  COMMUNICATION OF CODE

All directors, officers and employees will be supplied with a copy of the Code upon beginning service at Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.  Updates of the Code will be provided from time to time.  A copy of the Code is also available to all directors, officers and employees by requesting one from the human resources department.

10.  MONITORING COMPLIANCE AND DISCIPLINARY ACTION

Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.'s management, under the supervision of the Committee or, in the case of accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters, the Audit Committee, shall take reasonable steps from time to time to:

(a)

monitor compliance with the Code; and

(b)

when appropriate, impose and enforce appropriate disciplinary measures for violations of the Code.

Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.'s management shall periodically report to the Committee on these compliance efforts including, without limitation, periodic reporting of alleged violations of the Code and the actions taken with respect to any such violation.

11.  WAIVER AND AMENDMENTS

No waiver of any provisions of the Code for the benefit of a director or an executive officer (which includes without limitation, for purposes of this Code, Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.'s principal executive, financial and accounting officers) shall be effective unless:

(a)

approved by the Board of Directors or, if permitted, a committee thereof; and

(b)

if applicable, such waiver is promptly disclosed to Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.'s shareholders in accordance with applicable securities laws and/or the rules and regulations of the exchange or system on which the Company's shares are traded or quoted, as the case may be.

Any waivers of the Code for other employees may be made by the Compliance Officer, the Board of Directors or, if permitted, a committee thereof.

All amendments to the Code must be approved by the Board of Directors or a committee thereof and, if applicable, must be promptly disclosed to Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.'s shareholders in accordance with applicable securities laws and/or the rules and regulations of the exchanges on which the Company's shares are traded.



---

-122-



Exhibit 12.A

CERTIFICATION

I, Michael Levy, President of Petaquilla Minerals Ltd., certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) [omitted pursuant to Transition Period provisions at Section III of Release 34-47986 of the Securities and Exchange Commission entitled "Management's Reports on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and Certification of Disclosure in Exchange Act Periodic Reports"] for the company and have:

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)  [omitted pursuant to Transition Period provisions at Section III of Release 34-47986 of the Securities and Exchange Commission entitled "Management's Reports on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and Certification of Disclosure in Exchange Act Periodic Reports"];

(c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  The company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  May 3, 2006

/s/ Michael Levy

Michael Levy, President



---

-123-





Exhibit 12.B

CERTIFICATION

I, John S. Watt, Chief Financial Officer of Petaquilla Minerals Ltd., certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Petaquilla Minerals Ltd.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) [omitted pursuant to Transition Period provisions at Section III of Release 34-47986 of the Securities and Exchange Commission entitled "Management's Reports on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and Certification of Disclosure in Exchange Act Periodic Reports"] for the company and have:

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)  [omitted pursuant to Transition Period provisions at Section III of Release 34-47986 of the Securities and Exchange Commission entitled "Management's Reports on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and Certification of Disclosure in Exchange Act Periodic Reports"];

(c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  The company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 3, 2005

/s/ John S. WattJohn S. Watt, Chief Financial Officer



---

-124-



Exhibit 13.A

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. for the year ended January 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.  The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.  The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.

Date: May 3, 2006

/s/ Michael LevyMichael Levy, President

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



---

-125-





Exhibit 13.B

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. for the year ended January 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.  The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.  The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.

Date:  May 3, 2006

/s/ John S. WattJohn S. Watt, Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.