alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-53374, 333-105963 and 333-127025) and
Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-106126, 333-117264, 333-119864, 333-128074, and
333-138748) of Evergreen Solar, Inc. of our report dated February 27, 2007
relating to the financial statements of EverQ GmbH, which appears in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.

PricewaterhouseCoopers AG

Leipzig, Germany
February 27, 2007
39206.

39207.

39208.

39209.

39210.

39212.

39214.

39216.

#### BANKERS FIDELITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. PERKINS. BANKERS FIDELITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. NEWTON. BANKERS FIDELITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. PERKINS. BANKERS FIDELITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. ARMSTRONG. BANKERS FIDELITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. OLIVER. BANKERS FIDELITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. SANDERS. BANKERS FIDELITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. MILLER. BANKERS FIDELITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. NEWTON.

Decided November 17, 1961

Rehearing denied November 30, 1961.

*Sam F. Lowe, Jr.,*for plaintiff in error.

L. *II. Hilton, Hilton & Hilton,*contra.

Custer, Judge.

These cases being controlled by *Bankers Fidelity Life Ins. Co. v. Harrison,*ante, the judgment of the trial court overruling the first two grounds of demurrer to the petition, and sustaining certain grounds of demurrer to the answer, is affirmed. The judgment overruling the third ground of demurrer to the petition is reversed, and the fourth and fifth grounds of demurrer to the petition are not passed upon.

*Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part.*

*Carlisle, P. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.*

*904CORRECTIONS. Page 97, line 16 from top: Change *“Code*§ 38-414” to *“Code*§ 38-314.” Page 109, line 16 from top: Change “August 24” to “October 24.” Page 113, line 14 from bottom: Change “Murphy” to “Murph.” Page 366, line 13 from top: Change “his” to “its.” Page 446, line 12 from top: Change “69-1626” to “68-1626.” Page 578, lines 17 and 18 from bottom: Change “one special ground” to “several special grounds.” Page 746, line 6 from bottom: Change “defendant” to “plaintiff” and “plaintiff’s” to “defendant’s.” .. •
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

ORDER AMENDING RULE

227.1 OF THE PENNSYLVANIA 

RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

NO. 627

CIVIL PROCEDURAL RULES

DOCKET 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2nd day of July, 2015, upon the recommendation of the Civil 

Procedural Rules Committee; the proposal having been published for public comment at 

44 Pa.B. 5563 (August 23, 2014):

IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of 

Pennsylvania that Rule 227.1 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure is amended

in the attached form.

This ORDER shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(b), and 

shall be effective October 1, 2015.

Additions to the rule are shown in bold and are underlined.

Deletions from the rule are shown in bold and brackets.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000813897
<NAME> PSH MASTER L.P.I
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,760,593
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,289,011
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    109,709
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,108,279
<PP&E>                                      59,908,652
<DEPRECIATION>                              24,906,989
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              40,982,128
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       47,976,235
<BONDS>                                        500,000
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (7,494,107)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                40,982,128
<SALES>                                      7,471,773
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,485,050
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,219,128
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,180,103
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,085,819
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,085,819
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .35
        

</TABLE>
NPDES Comments

Hank Uhden to: Jack Faulk 01/25/2010 05:07 PM

Jack:

I attached your original document w/ our comments, along w/ a letter of 

comments from Lars Baker, who is the Supervisor of the Fremont County Weed & 

Pest and a member of my pesticides in groundwater committee.

First however are some general comments:

1. Please add a definition of "aquatic weeds".

2. As an overall comment, we feel that the EPA through the 6th Circuit Court 

ruling is trying to expand their authority beyond the Clean Water Act, by 

stating "waters of the U.S." and not using the CWA definition of navigable.

Hank Uhden

Manager - Technical Services

Wyoming Dept. of Agriculture

2219 Carey Avenue

Cheyenne, WY 82002-0100

Phone: 307-777-6574

Fax: 307-777-6593

E-Mail to and from me, in connection with the transaction of public business, 

is subject to the Wyoming Public Records Act and may be disclosed to third 

parties.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7858 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to establish a Medicare 

incident to modifier for mental health services furnished through telehealth. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 2, 2024 

Mr. JAMES (for himself, Mr. SCHWEIKERT, and Mr. DAVIS of North Carolina) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and 

Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to establish 

a Medicare incident to modifier for mental health services 

furnished through telehealth. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Telehealth Enhance5 ment for Mental Health Act of 2024’’ or the ‘‘TELEMH 

6 Act of 2024’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 7858 IH

1 SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF MEDICARE INCIDENT TO 

2 MODIFIER FOR MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES 

3 FURNISHED THROUGH TELEHEALTH. 

4 Section 1834(m)(7) of the Social Security Act (42 

5 U.S.C. 1395m(m)(7)) is amended by adding at the end 

6 the following new subparagraph: 

7 ‘‘(C) ESTABLISHMENT OF INCIDENT TO

8 MODIFIER FOR MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES

9 FURNISHED THROUGH TELEHEALTH.—Not 

10 later than 2 years after the date of the enact11 ment of this subparagraph, the Secretary shall 

12 establish requirements to include a code or 

13 modifier, as determined appropriate by the Sec14 retary, on claims for mental health services fur15 nished through telehealth under this paragraph 

16 that are furnished by auxiliary personnel (as 

17 defined in section 410.26(a)(1) of title 42, Code 

18 of Federal Regulations, or any successor regula19 tion) and billed incident to a physician or prac20 titioner’s professional services.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Editorial Note on Part 870
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 870 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 870.2120 Extravascular blood flow probe. ( a ) *Identification.* An extravascular blood flow probe is an extravascular ultrasonic or electromagnetic probe used in conjunction with a blood flowmeter to measure blood flow in a chamber or vessel.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).
About the NNI

Welcome to the National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) website. The NNI is a U.S. Government

research and development (R&D) initiative involving 20 departments and independent agencies

working together toward the shared vision of "a future in which the ability to understand and

control matter at the nanoscale leads to a revolution in technology and industry that benefits

society." The NNI brings together the expertise needed to advance this broad and complex field

—creating a framework for shared goals, priorities, and strategies that helps each participating

Federal agency leverage the resources of all participating agencies. With the support of the NNI,

nanotechnology R&D is taking place in academic, government, and industry laboratories across

the United States.

What is the NNI?

The NNI is a U.S. Government research and development (R&D) initiative involving the nanotechnology-related activities of 20 Federal

department and agency units.

The NSET Subcommittee

The NSET Subcommittee is the interagency body responsible for coordination of the National Nanotechnology Initiative.

NSET's Participating Federal Partners

Details on the agencies participating in the NSET Subcommittee.

Working Groups & Coordinators

The NSET Subcommittee created four Working Groups to enhance coordination and collaboration among NNI agencies.

National Nanotechnology Coordination Office (NNCO)

The NNCO provides staff support to the Nanoscale Science, Engineering, and Technology (NSET) Subcommittee.

Contact Information
Names, titles, and contact information for NNCO staff.

Acronyms

A list of nanotechnology- and NNI-related acronyms.
Editorial Note on Part 872
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 872 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 872.6880 Preformed impression tray. ( a ) *Identification.* A preformed impression tray is a metal or plastic device intended to hold impression material, such as alginate, to make an impression of a patient's teeth or alveolar process (bony tooth sockets) to reproduce the structure of a patient's teeth and gums.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 872.9. If the device is not labeled or otherwise represented as sterile, it is exempt from the current good manufacturing practice requirements of the quality system regulation in part 820 of this chapter, with the exception of § 820.180, with respect to general requirements concerning records, and § 820.198, with respect to complaint files.
[52 FR 30097, Aug. 12, 1987, as amended at 54 FR 13832, Apr. 5, 1989; 66 FR 38800, July 25, 2001]
Editorial Note on Part 864
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 864 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 864.5950 Blood volume measuring device. ( a ) *Identification.* A blood volume measuring device is a manual, semiautomated, or automated system that is used to calculate the red cell mass, plasma volume, and total blood volume.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).
[45 FR 60603, Sept. 12, 1980]
T o: B ri a n S h r a ge r/ R T P / U SE P A/ U S @ E P A

, T o n i J o n e s / R T P / U SE P A/ U S @ E P A

F ro m : K e r r y H e w i t t < k h e w i t t @ b io m a s sp o w e r a s s o c i a t ion

. c o m>

D a t e : 07 / 1 3 / 2011 03 : 11 P M

C c : Bo b C l e a v e s < b o b @ b i o m a s s p o w e r a s s o c i a t io n

. c o m>

, Ju l e e M a li n o w s k i

- B a l l < Ju l e e @ p p a ll c

. c o m>

, G a r y

M e lo w < g a r y

. m e lo w @m i c hi g a n b i o m a s s

. c o m>

Su b j e c t : M a j or Sou r c e B o il e r M A C T a n d C I S W I R ul es - B i o m a s s Boi l e r s H a z a r d o u s Air P ol l u t a n t E m i ss ion

T e s t in g D a t a

(S ee a t t a c h e d fil e : 2 011 07

- 06 B P A C B EA Bio m a s s E m i ss ion D a t a C o m p il a t i on f o r E P A S u b m i t t a l

. X L S)

(S ee a t t a c h e d fil e : 2 011 07

- 12 B P A M a nu a l H A P T es t D a t a S u b m i tt a l t o E P A (fi n a l )

. P D F)



### D e a r M r

. S

h r a g e r

— I b e l i e v e y o u j u s t s p o k e w i t h m y c ol l e a g u e

, B

o b C l e a v e s

, c o n c er n i n g a n e m a i l t h a t

w e se nt E P A

i n e r r o r y e s t e r d a y a t 3 : 33

p m

, w h ic h i n c l ud e d b ot h c

o rr e s p o n d e n c e a nd a n e x

c e l s p re a d s h ee t

. T h e s

p r e a d s h e e t

w a s s e n t i n e r r o r a nd i n cl u d e d c

o n f i d e n t i a l bu s

i n e s s i n f o r m a tio n n o t m e a n t to b e s

h a re d

. A s d i s

c u s s e d, p l e a se

d e l e t e t h e e m a i l a nd th e a tt

a c h m e n t s

, a nd i n s t e a d c o n s i d e r t h e a t

t a c h m e nt s t o t h i s e m a il a s t h e a p p r o p r i a t e

i n f o r m a ti o n

. P l e a s

e c o nt a c t m e s h o u l d y o u h a v e a n y q u e s

t io n s

, a n d I a p p r e ci a t

e y o u r a tt e n t io n to thi s m a t

t e r a n d

a p olo g i z e f

o r a n y i n c o n v e n i e n c e

.

K e rr y

K e rr y H e w i tt

A s s i st an t t o R o b e rt E

. C le a v es

B i o m a s s P o w e r As s o c i a t i on

100 M i d d l e S t r e et

P

. O

. B o x 9729

P o r t l an d

, M a i n e 04104

- 5029

D i r e ct ( 20 7 ) 2 28

- 7 3 75

F a x ( 20 7 ) 774

- 1 1 27



## P a g e 1 o f 1
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Maury Austin, certify that:

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofSouthwall Technologies Inc.;

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; and

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

The Chief Executive Officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrants and wehave:

Designated such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designated under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made know to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which the combined quarterlyreport is being prepared;

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant'sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in the quarterly report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by the quarterly report on such evaluations;and

Disclosed in the quarterly report any change in theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting; and

The Chief Executive Officer and I have disclosed , basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board ofdirectors:

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant'sinternal control over financial reporting.
# C_2016038EN.01004901.xml

| 1.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/49

---

Judgment of the General Court of 11 December 2015 — Finland v Commission

(Case T-124/14) (1)

1

((EAFRD - Expenditure excluded from financing - Rural development - One-off financial correction - Eligibility of expenditure incurred for the purchase of second hand machinery and equipment - Exemption for micro-, small and medium-sized undertakings - Article 55(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1974/2006))

(2016/C 038/63)

Language of the case: Finnish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Republic of Finland (represented by: J. Heliskoski and S. Hartikainen, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Aalto, J. Aquilina, P. Rossi and T. Sevón, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Implementing Decision 2013/763/EU on excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2013 L 338, p. 81), in so far as that decision excludes from European Union financing under the EAFRD certain expenditure of the Republic of Finland, amounting to EUR 92 782,58, as a result of their incompatibility with EU rules.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Implementing Decision 2013/763/EU on excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) in so far as that decision excludes from European Union financing under the EAFRD certain expenditure of the Republic of Finland, amounting to EUR 92 782,58, as a result of their incompatibility with EU rules; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Implementing Decision 2013/763/EU on excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) in so far as that decision excludes from European Union financing under the EAFRD certain expenditure of the Republic of Finland, amounting to EUR 92 782,58, as a result of their incompatibility with EU rules;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 142, 12.5.2014.

1

---
Editorial Note on Part 862
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 862 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 862.1115 Urinary bilirubin and its conjugates (nonquantitative) test system. ( a ) *Identification.* A urinary bilirubin and its conjugates (nonquantitative) test system is a device intended to measure the levels of bilirubin conjugates in urine. Measurements of urinary bilirubin and its conjugates (nonquantitative) are used in the diagnosis and treatment of certain liver diseases.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 862.9.
[52 FR 16122, May 1, 1987, as amended at 65 FR 2305, Jan. 14, 2000]
# C_2014194EN.01003101.xml

| 24.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 194/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 194/31

---

Action brought on 18 April 2014 — Warenhandelszentrum v OHIM — Baumarkt Max Bahr (NEW MAX)

(Case T-254/14)

2014/C 194/40

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Warenhandelszentrum Ltd. (Neu-Ulm, Germany) (represented by: F. Hirschel, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Baumarkt Max Bahr GmbH & Co. KG (Hamburg, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 29 January 2014 in case R 2035/2012-1 and allow the applicant’s trade mark applied for; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 29 January 2014 in case R 2035/2012-1 and allow the applicant’s trade mark applied for;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark, containing the word elements ‘NEW MAX’, for goods and services in Classes 3, 5 and 37 — Community trade mark application No 1 0 1 06  474

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Baumarkt Max Bahr GmbH & Co. KG

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Figurative mark, containing the word element ‘MAX’, for services in Class 35

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition rejected

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulment of the decision of the Opposition Division and complete rejection of the trade mark applied for

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: There is no likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue

Pleas in law:

---
July 22, 2014



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

GARY BERNARD ALLEN , Appellant

NO. 14

- 12

- 01086

- CR V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________ ________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

. We further order this decis ion certified below for observance.