alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                                    FORM 8-K


                                 CURRENT REPORT

                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


       Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): January 31, 1999
       ------------------------------------------------------------------


                         Frontier Financial Corporation
                         ------------------------------
               (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
       Washington                   0-15540                91-1223535
<S>                               <C>                  <C>
(State or other jurisdiction      (Commission          (IRS Employer Identi-
     of incorporation)            File Number)            fication Number)
</TABLE>

               332 SW Everett Mall Way, Everett, Washington 98204
               --------------------------------------------------
                (Address of principal executive offices/Zip Code)

       Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (425) 514-0700
       ------------------------------------------------------------------




ITEM 5.  Other Events

         The following information represents consolidated operating results for
Frontier Financial Corporation for the month of January 1999, following
consummation of the merger of Valley Bancorporation with and into Frontier
Financial Corporation on December 21, 1998.

         Revenues and net income of Frontier Financial Corporation and
Subsidiaries for the month ended January 31, 1999, were approximately
$5,401,000(1) and $2,347,000, respectively. In the opinion of management, all
adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.
Operating results for the month ended January 31, 1999 are not necessarily
indicative of the results that may be expected for the three months ending March
31, 1999.

(1) Includes net interest income and noninterest revenue



                                       1
<PAGE>   2

                                   SIGNATURES

         Pursuant to the requirements of the Security Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

         Dated: February 3, 1999

                                        FRONTIER FINANCIAL CORPORATION



                                        By:  /s/  Robert J. Dickson
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Robert J. Dickson
                                           Its: Chief Executive Officer



                                       2
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 41 (Wednesday, March 3, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 9588]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4402]



[[Page 9588]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Intelligence Agency Advisory Board; Closed Meeting

AGENCY: Defense Intelligence Agency, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of closed meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of subsection (d) of section 10 of 
Public Law 92-463, as amended by section 5 of Public Law 94-409, notice 
is hereby given that the Defense Intelligence Agency Advisory Board, 
will meet on March 22 and 23, 2010. The meeting is closed to the 
public.

DATES: The meeting will be held on March 22, 2010 (from 1 p.m. to 5 
p.m.) and on March 23, 2010 (from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.).

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Pentagon on March 22, and on 
Bolling Air Force Base on March 23.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. William Caniano, Director, DIA 
Congressional and Public Affairs, Washington, DC 20340; phone: 703-614-
4774.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The entire meeting is devoted to the 
discussion of classified information as defined in section 552b(c)(1), 
title 5 of the U.S. Code and therefore will be closed.

    Dated: February 25, 2010.
Mitchell S. Bryman,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2010-4402 Filed 3-2-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsLessons Learned: Mechanical Component and Tribology Activities in Support of Return to FlightThe February 2003 loss of the Space Shuttle Columbia resulted in NASA Management revisiting every critical system onboard this very complex, reusable space vehicle in a an effort to Return to Flight. Many months after the disaster, contact between NASA Johnson Space Center and NASA Glenn Research Center evolved into an in-depth assessment of the actuator drive systems for the Rudder Speed Brake and Body Flap Systems. The actuators are CRIT 1-1 systems that classifies them as failure of any of the actuators could result in loss of crew and vehicle. Upon further evaluation of these actuator systems and the resulting issues uncovered, several research activities were initiated, conducted, and reported to the NASA Space Shuttle Program Management. The papers contained in this document are the contributions of many researchers from NASA Glenn Research Center and Marshall Space Flight Center as part of a Lessons Learned on mechanical actuation systems as used in space applications. Many of the findings contained in this document were used as a basis to safely Return to Flight for the remaining Space Shuttle Fleet until their retirement.Document ID20170002627Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsHandschuh, Robert F.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Zaretsky, Erwin V.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredMarch 29, 2017Publication DateMarch 1, 2017Subject CategoryMechanical EngineeringReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-2017-219405E-19306GRC-E-DAA-TN29097Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 432938.11.01.03.06.02.06Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.KeywordsTribologyLubricationGearsMechanical ComponentsAvailable DownloadsNameType20170002627.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
# C_2016156EN.01003602.xml

| 2.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/36

---

Judgment of the General Court of 18 March 2016 — El Corte Inglés v OHIM — STD Tekstil (MOTORTOWN)

(Case T-785/14) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark MOTORTOWN - Earlier international figurative mark M MOTOR - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2016/C 156/47)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: El Corte Inglés, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J.L. Rivas Zurdo and M. Toro Gordillo, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: V. Melgar, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: STD Tekstil Limited Sirketi (Istanbul, Turkey)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 September 2014 (Case R 1960/2013-2), relating to opposition proceedings between STD Tekstil Limited Sirketi and El Corte Inglés, SA.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders El Corte Inglés, SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders El Corte Inglés, SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 34, 2.2.2015.

1

---
§ 821.50 Availability. ( a ) Manufacturers, distributors, multiple distributors, and final distributors shall, upon the presentation by an FDA representative of official credentials and the issuance of Form FDA 482 at the initiation of an inspection of an establishment or person under section 704 of the act, make each record and all information required to be collected and maintained under this part and all records and information related to the events and persons identified in such records available to FDA personnel.
( b ) Records and information referenced in paragraph (a) of this section shall be available to FDA personnel for purposes of reviewing, copying, or any other use related to the enforcement of the act and this part. Records required to be kept by this part shall be kept in a centralized point for each manufacturer or distributor within the United States.
[58 FR 43447, Aug. 16, 1993, as amended at 65 FR 43690, July 14, 2000]
Editorial Note on Part 864
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 864 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 864.9145 Processing system for frozen blood. ( a ) *Identification.* A processing system for frozen blood is a device used to glycerolize red blood cells prior to freezing to minimize hemolysis (disruption of the red cell membrane accompanied by the release of hemoglobin) due to freezing and thawing of red blood cells and to deglycerolize and wash thawed cells for subsequent reinfusion.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).
[45 FR 60639, Sept. 12, 1980]
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

NEIL R. BROWN,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-10187

D.C. No. 2:00-cr-00434-GEH

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Garland E. Burrell, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 15, 2010 ** 

Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Neil R. Brown appeals from the district court’s order denying his request for

early termination of supervised release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e). We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we dismiss.

FILED

FEB 22 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-10187

Brown contends that the district court erred when it denied his request for

early termination of supervised release. The valid and enforceable appeal waiver

set forth in the plea agreement precludes our review of this issue. See United

States v. Bibler, 495 F.3d 621, 623-24 (9th Cir. 2007); see also United States v.

Cope, 527 F.3d 944, 950 (9th Cir. 2008) (length of term of supervised release is

part of the sentence). We therefore enforce the waiver and dismiss the appeal.

DISMISSED.
#### Marguerite L. Nowell *v.*Ames Nowell

*John J. Sullivan,*with whom was *William C. Strong,*for the appellant (defendant).

*Edgar W. BassicJc III,*for the appellee (plaintiff).

The motion by the defendant to dismiss the plaintiff’s motion to dismiss or stay the appeal from the Superior Court in Fairfield County is denied.

*611
      *Edgar W. Bassick III,*for the appellee (plaintiff).

*William G. Strong,*with whom was *John J. Sullivan,*for the appellant (defendant).

Argued November 5

decided November 13, 1968

The motion by the plaintiff to dismiss or stay the appeal from the Superior Court in Fairfield County is denied.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 42 (Thursday, March 4, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 9868]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4601]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


University of Arkansas; Notice of Decision on Applications for 
Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instruments

    This is a decision pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, 
Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-
651, as amended by Pub. L. 106-36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). 
Related records can be viewed between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. in Room 
3720, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution Ave., NW., 
Washington, DC.
    Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. We know of no 
instruments of equivalent scientific value to the foreign instruments 
described below, for such purposes as this is intended to be used, that 
was being manufactured in the United States at the time of its order.
    Docket Number: 09-068. Applicant: University of Arkansas, 
Fayetteville, AK 72071. Instrument: Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging 
Microscope. Manufacturer: PicoQuant Photonics, Germany. Intended Use: 
See notice at 75 FR 3895, January 25, 2010.
    Reasons: The instrument must be able to perform using lasers with 
both continuous wave (CW) and pulsed mode. The use of picoseconds 
pulsed lasers is necessary to measure fluorescence lifetime. The use of 
CW lasers, so that the fluorophores will be continuously excited, is 
necessary to measure fluorescence intensity. The driver that controls 
the laser head provides user-selectable pulsed repetition rates. This 
instrument is unique in that it is capable of pulsed interleaved 
excitation (PIE)--Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) and of 
allowing repetition rates to be continuously varied down to the 200 kHz 
range. Furthermore, the instrument is compatible with atomic force 
microscopy by using objective scanning mode rather than sample scanning 
mode so that the sample-scanning Atomic Force Microscope (AFM) can be 
added to the microscope in a future upgrade.
    We know of no Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging Microscopes being 
manufactured in the United States at the time of order of this 
instrument.

    Dated: February 26, 2010.
Christopher Cassel,
Director, Subsidies Enforcement Office, Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-4601 Filed 3-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 7 (Tuesday, January 12, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 1622]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-441]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD


Sunshine Act; Notice of Meeting

Time and Date: 9 a.m. (Eastern Time), January 19, 2010.

Place: 4th Floor Conference Room, 1250 H Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20005.

Status: Parts will be open to the public and parts closed to the 
public.

Matters to be Considered: Parts Open to the Public
    1. Approval of the minutes of the November 16, 2009 Board member 
meeting.
    2. Thrift Savings Plan activity report by the Executive Director.
    a. Monthly Participant Activity Report.
    b. Monthly Investment Performance Report.
    c. Legislative Report.
    3. Website Re-Design Update.
    4. IT Modernization Plan Update.
    5. Quarterly Vendor Financial Report.
    6. Review of Gross and Net Expense Ratios.

Parts Closed to the Public

    7. Confidential Financial Information.

Contact Person for More Information: Thomas J. Trabucco, Director, 
Office of External Affairs, (202) 942-1640.

    Dated: January 7, 2010.
Thomas K. Emswiler,
Secretary, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-441 Filed 1-8-10; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6760-01-P
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NESTOR C. DOMINGO,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

MEGAN J. BRENNAN , Postmaster General Pacific Area United States Postal Service, Agency,

Defendant

- Appellee. No. 16

- 16784

D.C. No. 3:11

- cv

- 05333

- CRB

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California Charles R. Breyer, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 8, 2017 **

Before: REINHARDT, LEAVY, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Nestor C. Domingo appeals pro se from the district court’s order taxing costs

in his federal employment action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

We review for an abuse of discretion. Bravo v. City of Santa Maria , 810 F.3d 659,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# F ILED

MAY 10 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 16

- 16784

665 (9th Cir. 2016). We affirm.

To the extent Domingo challenges the district court’s authority to award

costs in this case , this court previously resolved this issue in Domingo v. Brennan

,

639 F. App’x 418, 420 (9th Cir. 2016) , and we are bound by this determination.

See S. Or. Barter Fair v. Jackson County , 372 F.3d 1128, 1136 (9th Cir. 2004)

(“The law of the case doctrine

. . . precludes a court from reexamining an issue

previously decided by

. . . a higher court in the same case.”) . Contrar y to

Domingo’s contention, defendant’s amended bill of costs, filed after this court’s

mandate issued, was not untimely , and our mandate did not preclude the district

court from recalculating the amount of the costs award

. See Stevens v. F/V Bonnie

Doon

, 731 F.2d 1433, 1435 (9th Cir. 1984) (“The mandate is controlling as to all

matters within its compass, but leaves to the district court any issue not expressly

or impliedly disposed of on appeal.”).

We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time on

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009)

.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert F. Kerris, state and attest that:

(1) I am the Chief Financial Officer of Ebix, Inc.
(the Registrant).

(2) In connection with the amended Quarterly Report of the Registrant on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended
June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the Report containing financial statements fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented.



By: /s/ Robert KerrisName: Robert Kerris Chief
Financial Officer November 15, 2012
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7684 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7684

To reauthorize the Morris K. Udall and Stewart L. Udall Trust Fund, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 15, 2024

Mr. Ciscomani (for himself and Ms. Stansbury) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the 
Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on Natural Resources, for a 
 period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To reauthorize the Morris K. Udall and Stewart L. Udall Trust Fund, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Udall Foundation Reauthorization Act 
of 2024''.

SEC. 2. INVESTMENT EARNINGS.

    Section 8(b)(1) of the Morris K. Udall and Stewart L. Udall 
Foundation Act (20 U.S.C. 5606(b)(1)) is amended by adding at the end 
the following: ``Beginning on October 1, 2023, and thereafter, interest 
earned from investments made with any new appropriations to the Trust 
Fund shall only be available subject to appropriations and is 
authorized to be appropriated to carry out the provisions of this 
Act.''.

SEC. 3. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE UDALL FOUNDATION TRUST FUND.

    Section 13 of the Morris K. Udall and Stewart L. Udall Foundation 
Act (20 U.S.C. 5609) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``2023'' and inserting 
        ``2029'';
            (2) in subsection (b), in the matter preceding paragraph 
        (1), by striking ``2023'' and inserting ``2029''; and
            (3) in subsection (c), by striking ``5-fiscal year period'' 
        and all that follows through the period at the end and 
        inserting ``5-fiscal year period beginning with fiscal year 
        2025.''.

SEC. 4. AUDIT OF THE FOUNDATION.

    Not later than 4 years after the date of enactment of this section, 
the Inspector General of the Department of the Interior shall complete 
an audit of the Morris K. Udall and Stewart L. Udall Foundation.
                                 <all>
```