57100 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 183 / Tuesday, September 22, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 

minimize litigation, eliminate 

ambiguity, and reduce burden. 

J. Protection of Children 

We have analyzed this rule under 

Executive Order 13045, Protection of 

Children from Environmental Health 

Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not 

an economically significant rule and 

does not create an environmental risk to 

health or risk to safety that may 

disproportionately affect children. 

K. Indian Tribal Governments 

This rule does not have tribal 

implications under Executive Order 

13175, Consultation and Coordination 

with Indian Tribal Governments, 

because it does not have a substantial 

direct effect on one or more Indian 

tribes, on the relationship between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities between the Federal 

Government and Indian tribes. 

L. Energy Effects 

This action is not a ‘‘significant 

energy action’’ under Executive Order 

13211, Actions Concerning Regulations 

That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use. 

M. Technical Standards 

This rule does not use technical 

standards. Therefore, we did not 

consider the use of voluntary consensus 

standards. 

N. Environment 

We have analyzed this rule under 

Department of Homeland Security 

Management Directive 023–01 and 

Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, 

which guide the Coast Guard in 

complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and 

have concluded this action is one of a 

category of actions which do not 

individually or cumulatively have a 

significant effect on the human 

environment. This rule involves the 

establishment of a safety zone and is 

therefore categorically excluded from 

further review under paragraph 34(g) of 

Figure 2–1 of the Commandant 

Instruction. An environmental analysis 

checklist supporting this determination 

and a Categorical Exclusion 

Determination will be prepared and 

submitted after publication, and will be 

available in the docket where indicated 

under ADDRESSES. We seek any 

comments or information that may lead 

to the discovery of a significant 

environmental impact from this rule. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation 

(water), Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Security measures, 

Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 

CFR part 165 as follows: 

PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION 

AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 

33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; 

Department of Homeland Security Delegation 

No. 0170.1. 

■ 2. Add § 165.T09–0835 to read as 

follows: 

§ 165.T09–0835 Safety Zone; Dredging, 

Rouge River, Detroit, MI. 

(a) Location. The following area is a 

temporary safety zone: All U.S. waters 

of the Rouge River, Detroit, MI from the 

West Jefferson Avenue Bridge at 

42°16.85′ N., 083°07.72′ W., proceeding 

East approximately 400-yards to a point 

mid-river at 42°16.80′ N., 083°07.47′ W. 

(b) Enforcement period. This rule is 

effective without actual notice from 

September 22, 2015 until 11:59 p.m. on 

September 24, 2015. For the purposes of 

enforcement, actual notice will be used 

from 10 a.m. on August 25, 2015, until 

September 22, 2015. 

(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with 

the general regulations in § 165.23, entry 

into, transiting, or anchoring within this 

safety zone is prohibited unless 

authorized by the Captain of the Port 

Detroit (COTP), via Sector Detroit 

Command Center or his on-scene 

representative. 

(2) The safety zone is closed to all 

vessel traffic, except as may be 

permitted by the COTP, via the 

Command Center or his on-scene 

representative. 

(3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of 

the COTP is any Coast Guard 

commissioned, warrant or petty officer 

or a Federal, State, or local law 

enforcement officer designated by or 

assisting the COTP to act on his behalf. 

(4) Vessel operators must contact the 

COTP via the Command Center to 

obtain permission to enter or operate 

within the safety zone. The COTP may 

be contacted via VHF Channel 16 or at 

313—568–9560. Vessel operators given 

permission to enter or operate in the 

safety zone must comply with all 

directions given to them by the COTP, 

via the Sector Command Center or his 

on-scene representative. 

Dated: August 25, 2015. 

Raymond Negron, 

Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting 

Captain of the Port Detroit. 

[FR Doc. 2015–24041 Filed 9–21–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 81 

[EPA–R09–OAR–2015–0608; FRL–9934–51– 

Region 9] 

Designation for Planning Purposes; 

California; PM10; Technical 

Amendment 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule; technical 

amendment. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is making a technical 

amendment to the Code of Federal 

Regulations to restore the inadvertent 

deletion of the entry for ‘‘Rest of State’’ 

from the table listing California air 

quality planning area designations for 

particulate matter of ten microns of less 

(PM10). 

DATES: This technical amendment is 

effective on September 22, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerry 

Wamsley, EPA Region IX, (415) 947– 

4111, wamsley.jerry@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March 

19, 2013, the EPA published a direct 

final rule amending 40 CFR 81.305 to 

clarify the description of the Imperial 

Valley planning area, an area designated 

nonattainment for the National Ambient 

Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for 

particulate matter of ten microns of less 

(PM10) (78 FR 16792). In our March 19, 

2013 direct final rule, we amended the 

entry for ‘‘Imperial Valley planning 

area’’ but did not intend to amend any 

other entry in the table listing PM10 air 

quality planning area designations for 

the State of California. We believe, 

however, that the entry appearing 

directly after the entry for ‘‘Imperial 

Valley planning area’’ in the 

‘‘California-PM–10’’ table and reading 

‘‘Rest of State; 11/15/90; Unclassifiable’’ 

was deleted inadvertently when the 

entry for ‘‘Imperial Valley planning 

area’’ was amended. For example, see 

and compare the ‘‘California-PM–10’’ 

table within the July 1, 2012 version to 

the July 1, 2013 version of 40 CFR 

81.305. 

Consequently, the EPA is publishing 

this technical amendment to restore the 

‘‘Rest of State’’ designation entry within 


Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 183 / Tuesday, September 22, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 57101 

the 40 CFR 81.305 ‘‘California-PM–10’’ 

table as it appeared prior to our March 

19, 2013 direct final action. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 81 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, National parks, 

Wilderness areas. 

Dated: September 9, 2015. 

Jared Blumenfeld, 

Regional Administrator, Region IX. 

Part 81, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code 

of Federal Regulations is amended as 

follows: 

PART 81—DESIGNATION OF AREAS 

FOR AIR QUALITY PLANNING 

PURPOSES 

■ 1. The authority citation for Part 81 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

■ 2. Section 81.305 is amended in the 

table for ‘‘California—PM–10’’ by 

adding an entry for ‘‘Rest of State’’ at the 

end of the table to read as follows: 

§ 81.305 California. 

* * * * * 

CALIFORNIA—PM–10 

Designated Area 

Designation Classification 

Date Type Date Type 

*******

Rest of State ........................................................................... 11/15/90 Unclassifiable.

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2015–24049 Filed 9–21–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

GENERAL SERVICES 

ADMINISTRATION 

41 CFR Part 102–117 

[FMR Case 2014–102–2; Docket 2014–0015; 

Sequence 1] 

RIN 3090–AJ45 

Federal Management Regulation 

(FMR); Transportation Management; 

Transportation Reporting 

AGENCY: Office of Government-wide 

Policy (OGP), General Services 

Administration (GSA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: GSA is amending the Federal 

Management Regulation (FMR) to 

recommend that agencies annually 

submit to GSA their prior fiscal year 

transaction level transportation data for 

freight and cargo, including household 

goods (HHG), procured either through 

contract or tender, as well as their 

transportation management information. 

The request for transaction level data 

and transportation management 

information is a change from the Notice 

of the Proposed Rulemaking’s 

recommendation that agencies annually 

submit to GSA a summary of their 

transportation activities. 

Specifically, this rule recommends 

that agencies report transaction level 

transportation data for freight and cargo, 

including HHG, such as shipments by 

procurement method, spending, 

transportation service providers (TSP), 

and shipping profiles. This rule also 

recommends that agencies report their 

transportation management information, 

such as environmental justice 

information, agency points of contact, 

and transportation officer warrant 

information and training data. 

This rule will provide GSA the data 

necessary for analysis, which will assist 

GSA in developing enhanced 

Governmentwide transportation policies 

to make transportation management 

programs more efficient, cost-effective, 

and sustainable. 

DATES: Effective: September 22, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

clarification of content, contact Ms. Lois 

Mandell, Office of Government-wide 

Policy, at (202) 501–2735 or by email at 

lois.mandell@gsa.gov. For information 

pertaining to status or publication 

schedules, contact the Regulatory 

Secretariat at 202–501–4755. Please cite 

FMR Case 2014–102–2. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

A. Background 

In almost every purchase of supplies 

and equipment from vendors, something 

must be moved and delivered. Since the 

early 1860s, the Federal Government 

has procured transportation using either 

a contract or a tender of service (also 

called a rate tender). There are Federal 

transportation laws and regulations that 

govern each of the five modes of 

transportation (air, water, pipeline, rail, 

and ground). Each mode has advantages 

and disadvantages that should be 

evaluated for cost, sustainability, speed 

of delivery, etc. The expense of moving 

this freight or cargo, including HHG, can 

be managed by the agency, consolidated 

as a shared service across agencies, or 

the TSP, depending upon the contract or 

tender of service terms. 

Over the last several years, GSA has 

worked with the Governmentwide 

Transportation Policy Council (GTPC) to 

identify key transportation performance 

measures, data elements, and collection 

standards necessary for more informed 

decision-making. The GTPC is 

composed of representatives from 

civilian agencies and the Department of 

Defense, and provides guidance in the 

planning and development of uniform 

transportation policies and procedures. 

Best in class organizations exhibit a 

consistent set of behaviors to identify 

and implement improved processes that 

maximize the efficiency, cost 

effectiveness, and sustainability of their 

transportation operations. Organizations 

seeking continuous improvement 

monitor, measure, and compare their 

performance against other organizations 

to improve return on investments, 

generate greater savings, enhance 

supply chain, and improve 

sustainability. The GTPC supports data 

collection as a necessary first step to 

improve transportation management. 

In 2009, GSA contracted for a 

Governmentwide transportation 

management study. The study 

concluded that ‘‘most agencies have no 

single point of accountability for 

outbound transportation, have limited 

transparency into actual expenditures, 

and usually do not identify the most 

appropriate procurement method.’’ The 

study also identified inadequate 

research into the acquisition and 

selection of a TSP, and a lack of 

standard training, expertise, and 

operational approaches to transportation 

management. A 2012 GSA study 


Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES