alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Skeen *v.*Glower *et al.*

Beck, P. J.

1. Where a purchaser of lands that are subject to the lien of a security deed previously executed by the grantor under seal, to secure his note given under seal, takes a warranty deed which recites that he as purchaser assumes the indebtedness evidenced by the note and secured by the lien, as a part of the purchase-price, such recital constituting the only evidence of the assumption of such debt, and the purchaser fails to pay off and discharge the indebtedness and lien, and is sued by his grantor for the amount paid by him in satisfaction of a deficiency judgment obtained against him by the payee and holder of the note, who has first exhausted the security by a sale of the land, the period of limitations applicable to such an action by the grantor against *511the purchaser is twenty years, the covenant binding upon the purchaser being in an instrument under seal *(Kytle*v. *Kytle,*128 *Ga.*387 (57 S. E. 748), and cit.) ; whereas in *Atlanta, Knoxville & Northern Ry. Co.*v. *McKinney,*124 *Ga.*929 (53 S. E. 701, 6 L. R. A. (N. S.) 436; 110 Am. St. R. 215), the deed was not under seal.

No. 8419.

February 25, 1932.

*P. E. Burns*and *L. P. Skeen,*for plaintiff in error.

*Watkins, Asbill & Watkins*and *B. O. Broyles,*contra.

2. The obligation of the grantee in the deed referred to was to discharge the lien of a security deed previously executed by the grantor under seal, which had been given to secure the payment of the grantor’s note; and when the grantee failed to pay this note and discharge the lien at the maturity of the note, there was a breach of the covenant contained in the deed, and the statute began to run from that date.

*All the Justices concur.*
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of CEC  Entertainment,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the  quarter  ended June 29, 2003 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



                                       /s/ Richard M. Frank
                                       -----------------------------
                                       Richard M. Frank
                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                       August 13, 2003


                                       /s/ Michael H. Magusiak
                                       -----------------------------
                                       Michael H. Magusiak
                                       President
                                       (Current Principal Financial Officer)
                                       August 13, 2003



A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to CEC  Entertainment,  Inc. and will be retained by CEC Entertainment,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon
request.
# C_2016098EN.01003902.xml

| 14.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 98/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 98/39

---

Judgment of the General Court of 28 January 2016 –Stavytskyi v Council

(Case T-486/14) (1)

1

((Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Ukraine - Freezing of funds - List of persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources - Inclusion of the applicant’s name - Proof that inclusion on the list is justified))

(2016/C 098/51)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Edward Stavytskyi (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: J. Grayston, Solicitor, and by P. Gjørtler, G. Pandey, D. Rovetta and M. Gambardella, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: V. Piessevaux and J.-P. Hix, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Council Implementing Decision 2014/216/CFSP of 14 April 2014 implementing Decision 2014/119/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2014 L 111, p. 91) and of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 381/2014 of 14 April 2014 implementing Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2014 L 111, p. 33), in so far as the applicant’s name was included on the list of persons, entities and bodies covered by those restrictive measures.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Council Implementing Decision 2014/216/CFSP of 14 April 2014 implementing Council Decision 2014/119/CFSP of 5 March 2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine, and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 381/2014 of 14 April 2014 implementing Council Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 of 5 March 2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine, in so far as they concern Mr Edward Stavytskyi; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Council Implementing Decision 2014/216/CFSP of 14 April 2014 implementing Council Decision 2014/119/CFSP of 5 March 2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine, and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 381/2014 of 14 April 2014 implementing Council Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 of 5 March 2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine, in so far as they concern Mr Edward Stavytskyi;

| 2. | Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Mr Stavytskyi. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Mr Stavytskyi.

---

(1)  OJ C 303, 8.9.2014.

1

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-20737

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

WANDA T. GIANCATERINO,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-99-CR-599-1

--------------------

June 14, 2001

Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM:*

Wanda Giancaterino appeals her jury conviction and sentence

for manufacturing, transferring, possessing, and concealing

counterfeit U.S. currency in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 471-73. 

For the first time on direct appeal, she asserts that she

received ineffective assistance of counsel at trial.

The only argument Giancaterino has briefed concerns the

effect her counsel’s alleged ineffectiveness had on her sentence. 

Direct appeal of her conviction is therefore waived. See Yohey
No. 00-20737

-2-

v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993); Fed. R. App. P.

28(a)(9). 

We address the merits of Giancaterino’s ineffectiveness

argument, despite being raised for the first time on appeal,

because we find this to be one of the “rare” cases where the

record allows a fair evaluation of the claim’s merits. See

United States v. Navejar, 963 F.2d 732, 735 (5th Cir. 1992);

United States v. Higdon, 832 F.2d 312, 313-14 (5th Cir. 1987). 

In order to establish ineffective assistance of counsel,

Giancaterino must show that (1) her counsel's performance was

deficient in that it fell below an objective standard of

reasonableness, and (2) the deficient performance prejudiced her

defense. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 689-94 (1984) 

Giancaterino fails to meet either requirement. 

The record establishes that her counsel’s decision to

proceed to trial after the Government refused a conditional

guilty plea was a strategic judgment call. The record is devoid

of evidence to rebut the “strong presumption that counsel’s

conduct [fell] within the wide range of reasonable professional

assistance.” See id. at 689.

Giancaterino furthermore concedes, and the record supports,

that she cannot establish the requisite prejudice because it is

purely speculative whether the district court would have awarded

a two-level decrease for acceptance of responsibility under

U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1 had she pleaded guilty. See id. at 694.

(defendant must show to a reasonable probability that the result

of the proceeding would have been different). AFFIRMED.
#### § 82.1261 D&C Orange No. 11.

The color additive D&C Orange No. 11 shall conform in identity and specifications to the requirements of § 74.1261(a)(1) and (b) of this chapter. D&C Orange No. 11 is restricted to use in externally applied drugs and cosmetics.

[46 FR 18954, Mar. 27, 1981]
Editorial Note on Part 862
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 862 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 862.2100 Calculator/data processing module for clinical use. ( a ) *Identification.* A calculator/data processing module for clinical use is an electronic device intended to process laboratory data.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9.
[52 FR 16122, May 1, 1987, as amended at 53 FR 21449, June 8, 1988; 66 FR 38788, July 25, 2001; 86 FR 20283, Apr. 19, 2021]
#### § 520.622 Diethylcarbamazine citrate oral dosage forms.
# C_2015389EN.01004902.xml

| 23.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 389/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 389/49

---

Judgment of the General Court of 25 September 2015 — August Storck v OHIM — (2good)

(Case T-366/14) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark 2good - Mark consisting of an advertising slogan - Absolute ground for refusal - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2015/C 389/54)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: August Storck KG (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: I. Rohr, A. C. Richter, P. Goldenbaum and T. Melchert, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Palmero Cabezas, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 27 February 2014 (Case R 996/2013-1), concerning an application for registration of the word sign 2good as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders August Storck KG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders August Storck KG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 253, 4.8.2014.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF HARBINGER CORPORATION FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          33,059
<SECURITIES>                                    59,248
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,355
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,464
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               137,653
<PP&E>                                          45,280
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,130
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 178,369
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           58,350
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                     120,015
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   178,369
<SALES>                                         47,084
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               135,151
<CGS>                                            4,203
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   39,436
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               108,367
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  64
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (7,822)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       705
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (8,527)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  (6,185)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (14,712)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.35)
        

</TABLE>
|FORM 6 - K
|----------



|SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549
|--------------------------------------------------------



|Report of Foreign Private
Issuer Pursuant to Rule 13a - 16 or 15d - 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|As of December 12, 2002
|-----------------------



|TUBES OF STEEL OF MEXICO, S.A.
(Translation of Registrants name into English)
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|TUBOS DE ACERO DE MEXICO, S.A.
Edificio Parque Reforma Campos Eliseos #400 Mexico, D.F., 11560 Mexico (Address of
principal executive offices)
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Indicate by check mark whether
the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form 20-F or 40-F.
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Form 20-F  |X|    
      Form 40-F  |_|
|---------------------------------------



|Indicate by check
mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form is also
thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12G3-2(b) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Yes  |_|    No  |X|
|-------------------



|If Yes is
marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with Rule
12g3-2(b): 82-____.
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







---





|This report on Form 6-K shall be incorporated by reference
      into the registration statement on Form F-4 (File No. 333-99769) of Tenaris
      S.A.
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|SIGNATURE
|---------



|Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: December 12, 2002
|-----------------------



|Tubos de Acero de Mexico, S.A.
|------------------------------

|By: /s/ Gerardo Varela
      Gerardo Varela 
      Chief Financial Officer |  | By: /s/ Cecilia Bilesio
      Cecilia Bilesio
      Corporate Affairs
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------



---
###### Editorial Note on Part 60

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 60 appear at 68 FR 24879, May 9, 2003, and at 88 FR 45065, July 14, 2023.

#### § 60.44 Hearing procedures.

The due diligence hearing shall be conducted in accordance with this part, supplemented by the nonconflicting procedures in part 16. During the due diligence hearing, the applicant and the petitioner shall enjoy all the rights and privileges accorded a person requesting a hearing under part 16. The standard of due diligence set forth in § 60.36 will apply in the due diligence hearing. The party requesting the due diligence hearing shall have the burden of proof at the hearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       3,010,448
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,535,708
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,267,410
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,576,461
<PP&E>                                      89,441,657
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,230,345
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              89,528,029<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,910,638
<BONDS>                                      7,875,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       16,010,655
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        38,438
<OTHER-SE>                                  57,287,409
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                89,528,029
<SALES>                                     32,641,302<F2>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            32,641,302<F2>
<CGS>                                       23,917,360
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               38,176,322<F3>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (126,862)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             678,516
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,086,674)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (2,075,494)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,011,180)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,011,180)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.52)
<FN>
<F1>TOTAL ASSETS INCLUDES ASSETS HELD FOR SALE OF $1,105,475.
<F2>SALES AND TOTAL REVENUES ARE NET OF FEDERAL AND STATE EXCISE TAXES.
<F3>TOTAL COSTS INCLUDE SPECIAL VALUATION PROVISION OF $5,172,650.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
_______________________________________ __ _____________ _______________ ____________ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly 133416(43) Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman,
Justices COMMUNITY RESOURCE CONSULTANTS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, SC: 133416 v COA: 269726 Ingham CC: 04-000879-CK PROGRESSIVE MICHIGAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by plai ntiff-appellee for extension to November 9, 2007 of the time for filing its supplemental brief is considered and it is
GRANTED.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 30, 2007

Clerk
# C_2016251EN.01002501.xml

| 11.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 251/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 251/25

---

Judgment of the General Court of 2 June 2016 — HX v Council

(Case T-723/14) (1)

1

((Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against Syria - Freezing of funds - Modification of the form of order sought - Error of assessment))

(2016/C 251/27)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: HX (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: S. Koev, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: I. Gurov and S. Kyriakopoulou, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Council Implementing Decision 2014/488/CFSP of 22 July 2014 implementing Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2014 L 217, p. 49), of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 793/2014 of 22 July 2014 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (OJ 2014 L 217, p. 10), and of Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/837 of 28 May 2015 amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2015 L 132, p. 82), in so far as the applicant’s name was included on the lists of persons and entities covered by those restrictive measures.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls, in so far as they concern HX, Council Implementing Decision 2014/488/CFSP of 22 July 2014 implementing Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria, and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 793/2014 of 22 July 2014 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls, in so far as they concern HX, Council Implementing Decision 2014/488/CFSP of 22 July 2014 implementing Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria, and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 793/2014 of 22 July 2014 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by HX. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by HX.

---

(1)  OJ C 462, 22.12.2014.

1

---