alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014292EN.01006101.xml

| 1.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 292/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 292/61

---

Action brought on 14 April 2014 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-43/14)

2014/C 292/79

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: S. Orlandi, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision to credit the applicant’s pension rights in the European Union pension scheme pursuant to the new GIPs relating to Articles 11 and 12 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations and the decision of 19 August 2013 which closes the file concerning the transfer of the applicant’s pension rights acquired from the Caisse Nationale d’Assurance Vieillesse des Travailleurs Salariés (CNAVTS) (National Old-Age Insurance Fund for Employees).

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare unlawful and therefore inapplicable Article 9 of the general implementing provisions of Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare unlawful and therefore inapplicable Article 9 of the general implementing provisions of Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations;

| — | Annul the decision of 18 September 2013 to credit the pension rights acquired by the applicant before taking up his duties, in the context of the transfer of those rights in the EU institutions’ pension scheme, pursuant to the general implementing provisions of Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of 3 March 2011; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of 18 September 2013 to credit the pension rights acquired by the applicant before taking up his duties, in the context of the transfer of those rights in the EU institutions’ pension scheme, pursuant to the general implementing provisions of Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of 3 March 2011;

| — | Annul the decision of 19 August 2013 to close the file concerning the transfer of the applicant’s pension rights acquired from the Caisse Nationale d’Assurance Vieillesse des Travailleurs Salariés (CNAVTS); |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of 19 August 2013 to close the file concerning the transfer of the applicant’s pension rights acquired from the Caisse Nationale d’Assurance Vieillesse des Travailleurs Salariés (CNAVTS);

| — | Order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Gordon A. Ulsh, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Exide Technologies;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and we have:     a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;     b. Designed such internal controls over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal controls over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;     c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and     d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control of financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):     a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and     b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.     By:/S/ Gordon A. Ulsh        **Gordon A. Ulsh**   **President and Chief Executive Officer**  Date: August 9, 2005
32
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM DAY
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM
10-K
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           4,762
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,774
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,384
<INVENTORY>                                     19,179
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                46,381
<PP&E>                                          66,972
<DEPRECIATION>                                (16,667)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 257,408
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,675
<BONDS>                                        256,223
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           36,627
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                    (80,284)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   257,408
<SALES>                                        173,066
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               173,066
<CGS>                                          110,155
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  160,897
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   306
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,470
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (15,607)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,732)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,875)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (3,552)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (16,427)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2014184EN.01004201.xml

| 16.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 184/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 184/42

---

Action brought on 11 March 2014 — ZZ v Europol

(Case F-21/14)

2014/C 184/69

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: J.-J. Ghosez, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Europol

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision not to renew the applicant’s fixed-term contract for an indefinite period and an order for Europol to pay her the difference between the amount of remuneration which she would have earned if she had remained in service and the unemployment benefit or any other allowance in lieu which she has received.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the defendant’s decision of 13 May 2013 informing the applicant that it would not grant her a permanent contract and that her current contract would come to an end on 31 October 2013, and annul the implied decision rejecting her complaint of 13 December 2013; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the defendant’s decision of 13 May 2013 informing the applicant that it would not grant her a permanent contract and that her current contract would come to an end on 31 October 2013, and annul the implied decision rejecting her complaint of 13 December 2013;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the applicant the difference between the amount of remuneration to which she would have been entitled if she had continued to be employed by Europol and the amount of remuneration, fees, unemployment benefit or any other allowance in lieu which she has actually received since 1 November 2013 as an alternative to the remuneration which she was receiving as a temporary member of staff; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the applicant the difference between the amount of remuneration to which she would have been entitled if she had continued to be employed by Europol and the amount of remuneration, fees, unemployment benefit or any other allowance in lieu which she has actually received since 1 November 2013 as an alternative to the remuneration which she was receiving as a temporary member of staff;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs in their entirety. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs in their entirety.

---
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 9438]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4243]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-70,380]


Americas Styrenics, LLC-Marietta Plant a Subsidiary of Americas 
Styrenics, LLLC Formerly Known as Chevron Phillips Chemical Co. LP 
Including On-Site Leased Workers From Pioneer Pipe Co.: Marietta, OH; 
Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker 
Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(``Act''), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a 
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance 
on November 19, 2009, applicable to workers of Americas Styrenics LLC-
Marietta plant, a subsidiary of Americas Styrenics LLC, including on-
site leased workers from Pioneer Pipe Co., Marietta, Ohio. The notice 
was published in the Federal Register on January 25, 2010 (75 FR 3937).
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged 
in the production of styrene monomer and polystyrene pellets.
    Information shows that Americas Styrenics LLC-Marietta Plant was 
formerly known as Chevron Phillips Chemical Co. LP. Some workers 
separated from employment at the subject firm had their wages reported 
under a separate unemployment insurance (UI) tax accounts for Chevron 
Phillips Chemical Co. LP.
    Accordingly, the Department is amending this certification to 
properly reflect this matter.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of the subject firm who were adversely affected by increased 
customer imports of styrene monomer and polystyrene pellets.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-70,380 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Americas Styrenics LLC-Marietta Plant, a 
subsidiary of Americas Styrenics LLC, formerly known as Chevron 
Phillips Chemical Co LP, including on-site leased workers from 
Pioneer Pipe Co., Marietta, Ohio, who became totally or partially 
separated from employment on or after May 20, 2008 through two years 
from the date of certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment 
assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as 
amended.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 27th day of January 2010.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Divisionof Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-4243 Filed 3-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
# C_2015302EN.01005301.xml

| 14.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 302/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 302/53

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 July 2015 — Roland SE v OHIM — Louboutin (Nuance of red on the sole of a shoe)

(Case T-631/14) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community trade mark consisting of a nuance of red on the sole of a shoe - Earlier international figurative mark my SHOES - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2015/C 302/68)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Roland SE (Essen, Germany) (represented by: C. Onken and O. Rauscher, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Pétrequin and A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Christian Louboutin (Paris, France) (represented by: T. van Innis, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 28 May 2014 (Case R 1591/2013-1) concerning opposition proceedings between Roland SE and Christian Louboutin.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Roland SE to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Roland SE to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 380, 27.10.2014.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Form 10-Q”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 of Crimson Exploration Inc. (the “Issuer”).  The undersigned hereby certifies that the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.

 

| Date:

  | November 16, 2009

  |   |
|---------------|---------------------------|--------|
|          | /s/ E. Joseph Grady       |   |
| Name:         | E. Joseph Grady           |   |
| Title:        | Chief Financial Officer   |   |
|          |                      |   |
|          |                      |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Issuer and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission, or its staff, upon request.
# C_2015155EN.01003805.xml

| 11.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/38

---

Order of the General Court of 16 March 2015 — Lech-Stahlwerke v Commission

(Case T-274/14) (1)

1

(2015/C 155/49)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 223, 14.7.2014.

1

---
Fi;_( IN COURT OF APPEALS

12th Court ofAppeals District

OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

8/7/2015 COA Case No. 12-14-00125-CR

WRIGHT, JEFFREY DOCK Tr. Ct. No. 241-1880-13 PD-1007-15

On this day, this Court has granted the Appellant's Pro Se motion for an extension

of time in which to file the Petition for Discretionary Review. The time to file the

petition has been extended to Monday, September 07, 2015. NO FURTHER

EXTENSIONS WILL BE ENTERTAINED. NOTE: Petition For Discretionary

Review must be filed with The Court of Criminal Appeals.

Abel Acosta, Clerk

12TH COURT OF APPEALS CLERK

CATHY LUSK

1517 W. FRONT, ROOM 354

TYLER, TX 75701

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

FILE COPY
38961.

#### BOBO v. THE STATE.

Decided July 14, 1961.

*Archibald A. Farrar,*for plaintiff in error.

*Earl B. Self, Solicitor-General,*contra.

Townsend, Presiding Judge.

The accusation charging that the defendant did on June 3, 1960, possess whisky not having affixed to the container thereof a tax stamp as provided by law, being general and not confined to the specific date only permitted a conviction on proof that the defendant possessed illegal whisky at any time within the period of the statute of limitations. *Haupt v. State,*108 Ga. 60 (33 SE 831). Regardless of whether the testimony as to the finding of whisky in the defendant’s home on the night of the raid, June 3rd, would be sufficient of itself to authorize a conviction, there is the testimony of a witness, a neighbor of the defendant, that in the spring prior to June 3rd he went twice to the defendant’s home and purchased moonshine whisky from a gallon bottle which the defendant kept under the sink. This is sufficient in itself to support the conviction.

The trial court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Frankum and Jordan, JJ., concur.*
[ARTICLE] 5
[MULTIPLIER] 1000
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   6-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          JAN-02-1997
[PERIOD-END]                               JUN-27-1995
[CASH]                                          12,677
[SECURITIES]                                         0
[RECEIVABLES]                                    2,648
[ALLOWANCES]                                         8
[INVENTORY]                                      3,731
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                                39,319
[PP&E]                                         285,197
[DEPRECIATION]                                 112,116
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                                 227,573
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                           37,013
[BONDS]                                         25,516
[COMMON]                                         2,178
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                            2,159
[PREFERRED]                                          0
[OTHER-SE]                                     155,671
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                   227,573
[SALES]                                        173,126
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                               175,625
[CGS]                                           81,582
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                  152,368
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                                30,751     
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                   (68)
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                               1,417
[INCOME-PRETAX]                                 23,257
[INCOME-TAX]                                     9,419
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                             13,838
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                                    13,838
[EPS-PRIMARY]                                      .72
[EPS-DILUTED]                                      .72
</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of GlycoGenesys, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:



(1)  the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2002 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods presented in the Report.



|By: |  | /s/    JOHN W.
BURNS               |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    BRADLEY J.
CARVER         
|--- |  | ---------------------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------
|    |  | John W. Burns SVP, CFO & Secretary |  |  |  |     |  | Bradley J. Carver CEO & President



Dated: April 11, 2003
§ 82.1336 D&C Red No. 36. ( a ) The color additive D&C Red No. 36 shall conform in identity and specifications to the requirements of § 74.1336 (a)(1) and (b) of this chapter.
( b ) All lakes of D&C Red No. 36 shall be manufactured from previously certified batches of the straight color additive.
[53 FR 29031, Aug. 2, 1988]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       6,428,718
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,189,092
<ALLOWANCES>                                   505,865
<INVENTORY>                                 15,185,517
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            36,760,045
<PP&E>                                      10,622,282
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,460,110
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              42,856,554
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,488,210
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    20,723,960
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                42,856,554
<SALES>                                     69,981,252
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            69,981,252
<CGS>                                       58,285,202
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               58,285,202
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,350,718
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              73,788
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,271,544
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,132,325
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,139,219
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,139,219
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.78
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.73
        

</TABLE>