alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit








Trimble Inc. Annual Management Incentive Plan Description


	
		
	1.
	Definitions:




 
	
			
	 
	a.
	“Company” means Trimble Inc., a Delaware corporation. 




 
	
			
	 
	b.
	“Board of Directors” means the Board of Directors of the Company. 




 
	
			
	 
	c.
	“Operating Income” means (i) with respect to a division or sector, operating income for that division or sector and (ii) with respect to the Company, operating income for the Company adjusted for amortization of intangibles, restructuring and infrequent charges. 






	
			
	 
	d.
	“Plan” means this Trimble Inc. Annual Management Incentive Plan.






	
		
	2.
	Participants: The CEO, all of the Vice Presidents of the Company and a number of senior-level managers and individual contributors as nominated by their respective Vice Presidents and approved by the CEO of the Company.






	
		
	3.
	Payments earned under the Plan depend upon the Company’s annual Operating Income, with certain goals and minimum thresholds for revenue and Operating Income, as such goals and thresholds are established by the CEO and Board of Directors.






	
		
	4.
	Target payouts, ranging from 10% to 125% of base annual salary for each participant are determined by the CEO of the Company in conjunction with the executive officers and the vice presidents of the Company, and approved by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors has established a 125% target for the CEO.






	
		
	5.
	The payout under the Plan ranges from zero to 300% of each participant’s target, upon achievement of each fiscal year’s planned goals based on Operating Income of a combination of division, sector, and/or Company performance. For the CEO, other executive officers of the Company and certain key senior-level managers, payments are made on an annual basis, after the close of the respective fiscal year based on achievement of annual goals. For other participants, payments are made on a bi-annual basis, with up to 25% of a participant’s target goal payable at mid-year upon the achievement of certain mid-year Operating Income targets, and the remainder payable after the close of the fiscal year based on achievement of annual goals. All payments are made net of employment, income and other applicable tax withholding. Participants may be required to remain continuously employed through a payment date to be entitled to a payout for the applicable period.






	
		
	6.
	No payout under the Plan shall be intended to be deferred compensation under section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and will be interpreted accordingly. In this regard, all payouts under the Plan (to the extent otherwise payable pursuant to the terms of the Plan) shall be made no later than 2 1/2 months following the end of the year in which the payout is no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture. 






	
		
	7.
	The Plan shall continue in effect, from year to year, until terminated or amended by the Board of Directors.
1845-0039 – Affected Public – Not-for-Profit Institutions 3/17/2015

Institutions are required to report student Pell Grant payment information to ED electronically. 

Electronic reporting is conducted through the Common Origination and Disbursement (COD) 

system. The COD system is used by institutions to request, report, and reconcile grant funds 

received from the Pell Grant program. 

ED uses the information collected in the COD system to aid in ensuring compliance with fiscal 

and administrative requirements under the HEA for the Pell Grant program and under 34 CFR 

690 for the Pell Grant program regulations.

The minimum reporting requirement is one record for origination and disbursement data per 

student, per grant award, per award year. Institutions may correct an accepted COD record as 

many times as they wish, but are not required to submit changes unless the student’s award 

amount changes from the accepted origination amount originally established in COD.

For the 2014-2015 award year, the projected number of FAFSA completers is expected to be 

reduced by 2.86%. Based on the 8,738,722 unduplicated student recipients for the Federal Pell 

Grant program for 2013-2014, the number of unduplicated Federal Pell Grant recipients for 

2014-2015 is estimated to be 8,488,843 multiplied by .07 hours per recipient for all institutions

to enter data in the COD system for a total of 594,219 burden hours. 

1,717 Not-for-Profit institutions 

1,103,549 responses X .07 hours = 77,248 burden hours
§ 582.5252 Choline chloride. ( a ) *Product.* Choline chloride.
( b ) *Conditions of use.* This substance is generally recognized as safe when used in accordance with good manufacturing or feeding practice.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Exide Technologies (the
"Corporation") for the quarter ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Subject Report"),
the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Corporation, certify that:

         (1)   Subject to the qualifications below, the Subject Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the "1934 Act"); and

         (2)   The information contained in the Subject Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Corporation.

         The foregoing statement is made to the knowledge of each of the
undersigneds, and is subject to the following qualifications:

         (a)   The SEC has issued comments on the following reports of the
Corporation: Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2001, Amended Form 10-K for
the year ended March 31, 2001, Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2001,
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2001, Form 8-K/A dated December
13, 2000 and Form 8-K dated March 23, 2001. The Corporation has responded to
these comments. To the knowledge of the undersigned, the information contained
in the Subject Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Corporation. There can be no
assurances however that the SEC will not have additional comments or reach a
different determination than the Corporation.

         (b)   Certain information in the Subject Report relates to periods
prior to the undersigneds' affiliation with the Corporation. Craig H. Muhlhauser
joined the Corporation as President and Chief Operating Officer in July, 2000
and became CEO in September, 2001. Lisa J. Donahue joined the Corporation in
October, 2001.

/s/ CRAIG H. MUHLHAUSER             /s/ LISA J. DONAHUE
-----------------------             -------------------
Craig H. Muhlhauser                 Lisa J. Donahue
Chief Executive Officer             Chief Financial Officer



November 14, 2002
#### Fred Ferro *v.*Frederick G. Reincke, Warden, Connecticut State Prison

*George D. Stoughton,*assistant state’s attorney, for the appellee (defendant).

*Bernard D. Gaffney*and *James A. Wade,*special public defenders, for the appellant (plaintiff).

Argued December 2

decided December 2, 1969

The motion by the defendant to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County is granted.

The motion by Bernard D. Gaffney to withdraw his appearance for the plaintiff in the appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County is granted.
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Joseph Pascale

*Jeremiah M. Keefe,*assistant state’s attorney, for the appellee (state).

*F. Patrick Zailckas,*for the appellant (defendant).

Argued November 4

decided November *5,*1969

The motion by the state to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in New Haven County at Waterbary is denied.
**Exhibit
      32.2**








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Annual Report of Astea International Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Rick Etskovitz,
      Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial and Chief Accounting Officer
      of
      the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:








|(1) | The
              Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
              of
              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







|(2) | The
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
              Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




/s/ 
                Rick EtskovitzRick
                EtskovitzChief
                Financial Officer(Principal
                Financial and Accounting Officer)April
                2, 2007
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 23(c)


               CONSENT TO INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-29049), as supplemented by the Prospectus dated
June 23, 1997 and the Prospectus Supplemented dated May 11, 1999, of our report
dated January 17, 1997 appearing on page 20 of Aristar, Inc's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998. We also consent to the reference
to us under the heading "Experts" in such Registration Statement.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Tampa, Florida
May 11, 1999
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 10.6

         The consolidated financial statements for 2001 and 2000 of Virgin
Mobile Telecoms Limited ("Virgin Mobile") and Polska Telefonia Cyfrowa
Sp. z o.o. ("PTC") appearing in our annual report on Form 20-F for the year
ended December 31, 2002, as amended, have been audited by Arthur Andersen and
Arthur Andersen Sp. z o.o.

         We have not been able to obtain, after reasonable efforts, the written
consent of Arthur Andersen or Arthur Andersen Sp. z o.o., as required by section
7 of the Securities Act for incorporation by reference of their respective
reports on the consolidated financial statements of Virgin Mobile and PTC for
2001 and 2000. Rule 437a of the Securities Act, as amended, permits us to
incorporate by reference into our registration statements these reports on the
financial statements without the consent of Arthur Andersen and Arthur Andersen
Sp. z o.o. Because Arthur Andersen and Arthur Andersen Sp. z o.o. have not
consented to the incorporation by reference of their respective reports herein,
an investor's ability to recover for claims against Arthur Andersen and Arthur
Andersen Sp. z o.o. may be limited. In particular, an investor will not be able
to recover against Arthur Andersen or Arthur Andersen Sp. z o.o., under Section
11(a)(4) of the Securities Act for any untrue material fact contained in the
financial statements audited by Arthur Andersen and Arthur Andersen Sp. z o.o.,
or any omission to state a material fact required to be stated therein.
#### JOHNSON *against*DEPUY.

03ST CERTIORARI.

Verdict must be rendered by voice in open court.

Kirkpatrick, C. J.

— It appears from the return of the justice, that the jury wrote down their verdict and°delivered the writing to the justice instead of openly pronouncing their verdict. We have no such practice. [121] It would be subject to great abuses. We know of no lawful verdict but that which is pronounced by open voice, in open court; a privy verdict is a differemt thing, and has no resemblance to this case. For this reason let judgment be set aside.

Rossell and Pennington, Justices. — ^Concurred.

Judgment reversed.
# C_2015262EN.01004401.xml

| 10.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/44

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 29 June 2015 — Chezzi v Commission

(Case F-62/14) (1)

1

(2015/C 262/60)

Language of the case: French

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 361, 13.10.2014, p. 31.

1

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 21.01


                       SUBSIDIARIES OF CORIXA CORPORATION


                        Chinook Acquisition Corporation
Fw: Changes to MATS New Source Limits RobertJ Wayland to: Bill Maxwell 11/16/2012 11:42 AM Show Details

----- Forwarded by RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US on 11/16/2012 11:42 AM

-----

From: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US To: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> Date: 11/08/2012 11:00 AM Subject: Re: Changes to MATS New Source Limits

MATS Reconsid Interagency_110812.pptx

From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 11/08/2012 09:48 AM Subject: Changes to MATS New Source Limits

Hi Bob, Do you have materials I can share with the interagency reviewers of changes that have been made to the new source standards, like a powerpoint or a “one pager”?

Thanks, Cortney
§ 70.10 Color additives in standardized foods and new drugs. ( a ) *Standardized foods.* ( 1 ) Where a petition is received for issuance or amendment of a regulation establishing a definition and standard of identity for a food under section 401 of the act, which proposes the inclusion of a color additive in the standardized food, the provisions of the regulations in part 71 of this chapter shall apply with respect to the information that must be submitted with respect to the safety of the color additive (if such information has not previously been submitted and safety of the color additive for the intended use has not been already established), and the petition must show also that the use of the color additive in the standardized food would be in conformance with section 401 of the act or with the terms of a temporary permit issued under § 130.17 of this chapter.
( 2 ) If a petition for a definition and standard of identity contains a proposal for a color additive regulation, and the petitioner fails to designate it as such, the Commissioner, upon determining that the petition includes a proposal for a color additive regulation, shall so notify the petitioner and shall thereafter proceed in accordance with the regulations in part 71 of this chapter.
( 3 ) A regulation will not be issued allowing the use of a color additive in a food for which a definition and standard of identity is established, unless its issuance is in conformance with section 401 of the act or with the terms of a temporary permit issued under § 130.17 of this chapter. When the contemplated use of such additive complies with the terms of a temporary permit, the color additive regulation will be conditioned on such compliance and will expire with the expiration of the temporary permit.
( b ) *New drugs.* ( 1 ) Where an application for a new drug is received and this application proposes, for coloring purposes only, the inclusion of a color additive, the provisions of the regulations in part 71 of this chapter shall apply with respect to the information that must be submitted about the safety of the color additive, if such information has not previously been submitted and safety of the color additive for the intended use has not already been established.
( 2 ) If an application for a new drug inferentially contains a proposal for a color additive regulation, and the applicant fails to designate it as such, the Commissioner, upon determining that the application includes a proposal for a color additive regulation, shall so notify the applicant and shall thereafter proceed in accordance with the regulations in part 71 of this chapter.
( 3 ) Where a petition for a color additive must be filed in accordance with paragraph (b)(2) of this section, the date of filing of the color additive petition shall be considered as the date of filing of the new-drug application.
[42 FR 15636, Mar. 22, 1977, as amended at 64 FR 400, Jan. 5, 1999]
Swanson, Brian (OST) . 

From: 

Sent:.· 

To: 

Frances Fouch <francesfouch@hotmail.com> 

• · Frfday, August 17, 2012 11:09 AM 

Swanson, Brian (OST) 

QO'f osr-2..po4 -t't'l \ t, 

Subject: RE: Docket Number DOT-OST-2004-19916 & Air Services to Visalia, CA 

Docket Management Facility 

US Department of Tr;msportation 

1200 New Jersey SE Room W12-140 

Washington, DC 20590-0001 . ...J 

Dear Sir, 

This letter is to let you know that I support continuance of Essential Air Services at Visalia, Ca. and that 

my preferred carrier is Great Lakes Airline. It allows my grandfather in Arizona to come to visit family in 

Visalia, CA. 

Thank you, 

Frances Fouch 

P.O. Box 668 

Goleta, CA 93116 

1
§ 56.111 Criteria for IRB approval of research. ( a ) In order to approve research covered by these regulations the IRB shall determine that all of the following requirements are satisfied: ( 1 ) Risks to subjects are minimized: ( i ) By using procedures which are consistent with sound research design and which do not unnecessarily expose subjects to risk, and
( ii ) whenever appropriate, by using procedures already being performed on the subjects for diagnostic or treatment purposes.
( 2 ) Risks to subjects are reasonable in relation to anticipated benefits, if any, to subjects, and the importance of the knowledge that may be expected to result. In evaluating risks and benefits, the IRB should consider only those risks and benefits that may result from the research (as distinguished from risks and benefits of therapies that subjects would receive even if not participating in the research). The IRB should not consider possible long-range effects of applying knowledge gained in the research (for example, the possible effects of the research on public policy) as among those research risks that fall within the purview of its responsibility.
( 3 ) Selection of subjects is equitable. In making this assessment the IRB should take into account the purposes of the research and the setting in which the research will be conducted and should be particularly cognizant of the special problems of research involving vulnerable populations, such as children, prisoners, pregnant women, handicapped, or mentally disabled persons, or economically or educationally disadvantaged persons.
( 4 ) Informed consent will be sought from each prospective subject or the subject's legally authorized representative, in accordance with and to the extent required by part 50.
( 5 ) Informed consent will be appropriately documented, in accordance with and to the extent required by § 50.27.
( 6 ) Where appropriate, the research plan makes adequate provision for monitoring the data collected to ensure the safety of subjects.
( 7 ) Where appropriate, there are adequate provisions to protect the privacy of subjects and to maintain the confidentiality of data.
( b ) When some or all of the subjects, such as children, prisoners, pregnant women, handicapped, or mentally disabled persons, or economically or educationally disadvantaged persons, are likely to be vulnerable to coercion or undue influence additional safeguards have been included in the study to protect the rights and welfare of these subjects.
( c ) In order to approve research in which some or all of the subjects are children, an IRB must determine that all research is in compliance with part 50, subpart D of this chapter.
[46 FR 8975, Jan. 27, 1981, as amended at 56 FR 28029, June 18, 1991; 66 FR 20599, Apr. 24, 2001]
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 181 (Tuesday, September 18, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 57566]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-22965]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OW-2012-0035; FRL-9730-7]

Announcement of Public Meeting on the Consumer Confidence Report 
(CCR) Rule Retrospective Review and Request for Public Comment on 
Potential Approaches to Electronic Delivery of the CCR; Correction

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of a Public Meeting and Request for Public Comments; 
correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a 
document in the Federal Register of September 11, 2012, announcing a 
public meeting listening session and a request for public comments. The 
document contained an incorrect URL link for the pubic to use to 
register for the meeting.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Adrienne Harris, Drinking Water 
Protection Division, at (202) 250-8793.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of September 11, 2012, in FR Doc. FRL-9726-
8; on page 55833, in the third column, in the sixth paragraph, correct 
the first sentence of the paragraph to read as follows:
    Public Meeting Registration: Individuals planning on participating 
in the public meeting must register for the meeting at http://www.horsleywitten.com/ccrretroreview.

    Dated: September 12, 2012.
Pamela S. Barr,
Acting Office Director, Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water.
[FR Doc. 2012-22965 Filed 9-17-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7570 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7570

  To rescind unobligated funds under the American Rescue Plan Act of 
  2021, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, and the Inflation 
                             Reduction Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 6, 2024

  Mr. Ogles (for himself, Mr. Harris, Mr. Green of Tennessee, and Mr. 
    Biggs) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To rescind unobligated funds under the American Rescue Plan Act of 
  2021, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, and the Inflation 
                             Reduction Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Shrinkflation Reduction Act''.

SEC. 2. RECISSIONS OF UNOBLIGATED BALANCES.

    The unobligated balances of any amounts made available under any of 
the following laws are hereby rescinded:
            (1) The American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (Public Law 117-
        2).
            (2) The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (Public Law 
        117-58).
            (3) Public Law 117-69 (commonly referred to as the 
        ``Inflation Reduction Act'').
                                 <all>
```