alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2018323DE.01003701.xml

| 19.12.2018 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 323/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2018

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 323/37

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) 2018/1240 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 12. September 2018 über die Einrichtung eines Europäischen Reiseinformations- und -genehmigungssystems (ETIAS) und zur Änderung der Verordnungen (EU) Nr. 1077/2011, (EU) Nr. 515/2014, (EU) 2016/399, (EU) 2016/1624 und (EU) 2017/2226

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 236 vom 19. September 2018
  )

Auf Seite 19, Artikel 9 Absatz 3 Satz 1:

Anstatt:

„(3)   Der ETIAS-Überwachungsausschuss formuliert für die Zwecke des Absatzes 2 Stellungnahmen, Leitlinien und Empfehlungen und legt bewährte Verfahren fest. ...“

muss es heißen:

„(3)   Der ETIAS-Überprüfungsausschuss formuliert für die Zwecke des Absatzes 2 Stellungnahmen, Leitlinien und Empfehlungen und legt bewährte Verfahren fest. ...“

Auf Seite 19, Artikel 9 Absatz 4 Satz 1:

Anstatt:

„(4)   Der ETIAS-Überwachungsausschuss tritt bei Bedarf, mindestens jedoch zweimal jährlich, zusammen. ...“

muss es heißen:

„(4)   Der ETIAS-Überprüfungsausschuss tritt bei Bedarf, mindestens jedoch zweimal jährlich, zusammen. ...“

Seite 20, Artikel 9 Absatz 6:

Anstatt:

„(6)   Der ETIAS-Überwachungsausschuss nimmt in seiner ersten Sitzung mit einfacher Mehrheit seiner Mitglieder seine Geschäftsordnung an.“

muss es heißen:

„(6)   Der ETIAS-Überprüfungsausschuss nimmt in seiner ersten Sitzung mit einfacher Mehrheit seiner Mitglieder seine Geschäftsordnung an.“

---
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB ("Form 10-KSB") of Smart-tek Solutions, Inc. (the "Company") for the annual period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Perry Law, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Form 10-KSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Perry Law

------------------------------

Perry Law

Chief Financial Officer

November 7, 2007
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

***************************** 

In the Matter of: * 

MACH ONE AIR CHARTERS, INC. * DocketNo. FAA-2015-0643 

* Case No. 2014WP210018 

* ALJ - RAW ALD 

* 

***************************** 

NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY 

COMES NOW, Complainant, by counsel, and hereby notices that attorney Lisa Toscano 

substitutes in for Glenn Brown as counsel for the Complainant in this matter. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Naomi Tsuda 

Assistant Chief Counsel 

For Enforcement 

By:~/~ 

Dated: 

Lisa Toscano, Attorney 

Enforcement Division, Western Tean1 

email: Lisa.M.Toscano@faa.gov 

Telephone: (310) 725-7100 (main) 

(310) 725-7110 (direct) 

(310) 725-6816 (fax) 

NOV 3 C 2016 
DOCKETNO. FAA-2015-0643 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on this date I have sent by a copy of the foregoing NOTICE OF 

SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY by U.S. Certified Mail - return receipt requested and by 

either facsimile transmission or electronic mail, as indicated, to the following: 

The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald 

Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

US Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

Fax: (202) 366-7536 

Steven L. Graff, Esq. 

Steven L. Graff, Inc. 

43399 Calle De Velardo 

Temecula, CA 92592 

Email: aviationcounsel@aol.com 

I further certify that on this date I have served the original and one copy of the foregoing 

NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY by U.S. Certified Mail- return receipt 

requested and facsimile, addressed as follows: 

Dated: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2Wl 000 

Fax: (202) 267-1293 

NOV c O 2016 

Antonia Garcia, Paralegal Specialist 

Enforcement Division, Western Team 

Lawndale, CA 

2
#### § 582.99 Adjuvants for pesticide chemicals.

Adjuvants, identified and used in accordance with 40 CFR 180.910 and 180.920, which are added to pesticide use dilutions by a grower or applicator prior to application to the raw agricultural commodity, are exempt from the requirement of tolerances under section 409 of the act.

[85 FR 72908, Nov. 16, 2020]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           6,665
<SECURITIES>                                    31,467
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,097
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (784)
<INVENTORY>                                        455
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                69,538
<PP&E>                                          13,389
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,196)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 101,922
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,854
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            24
<OTHER-SE>                                      88,521
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   101,922
<SALES>                                         24,072
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,072
<CGS>                                            7,509
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,509
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,443
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  26
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,549
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,337
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,212
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,212
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.17
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32(a)**
 
 **Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350**
 **(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**
 
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Republic Bancorp Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date: November 8, 2004
/s/ Dana M. CluckeyName: Dana M. CluckeyTitle: President and Chief Executive Officer 
 The foregoing certification (i) accompanies the filing and is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, (ii) will not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (iii) will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
 
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Republic Bancorp Inc. and will be retained by Republic Bancorp Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
The State s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 15, 2013

No. 04-13-00086-CV

ONE (1) 1992 CHEVROLET PK, 1GCEC14Z4NE164549,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-CI-13890

Honorable Laura Salinas, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s brief was due on May 6, 2013. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). When no brief 

or motion for extension of time had been filed, on May 16, 2013, we ordered Appellant to show 

cause in writing by May 28, 2013, why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of 

prosecution. See id. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a). On the due date, Appellant filed a response to our 

May 16, 2013 order, and we granted Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file the brief 

until July 3, 2013. On July 8, 2013, Appellant filed a second motion for extension of time to file 

the brief until August 2, 3013, for a total extension of sixty days.

Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file his brief is GRANTED. Appellant’s 

brief must be filed with this court not later than August 2, 2013. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(d). 

NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME WILL BE GRANTED. If Appellant fails 

to file his brief by August 2, 2013, the court may dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. 

See id. R. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). 

Appellant also filed a motion for extended law library use. He complains that the prison 

authorities’ limits on his access to the law library are hindering his ability to prepare his brief. 

Prison authorities must provide a pro se inmate with reasonable access to an adequate law 

library. See Bounds v. Smith, 430 U.S. 817, 821, 828 (1977); Dunn v. State, 819 S.W.2d 510, 
525 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Thomas v. Brown, 927 S.W.2d 122, 125–26 (Tex. App.—Houston 

[14th Dist.] 1996, writ denied). However, a penal institution may limit an inmate’s access to a 

law library if the limitation is “reasonably related to legitimate penological interests.” Thomas, 

927 S.W.2d at 126 (citing Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78, 89 (1987) (“[W]hen a prison regulation 

impinges on inmates’ constitutional rights, the regulation is valid if it is reasonably related to 

legitimate penological interests.”)). 

Appellant’s motion for extended law library use is DENIED without prejudice. See

Thomas, 927 S.W.2d at 125–26 (requiring an inmate to show both unreasonable access and 

actual injury). 

___________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 15th day of July, 2013.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
[ARTICLE] 5
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   3-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          DEC-29-1995
[PERIOD-END]                               MAR-31-1995
[CASH]                                           7,358
[SECURITIES]                                         0
[RECEIVABLES]                                    3,395
[ALLOWANCES]                                       364
[INVENTORY]                                      3,347
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                                19,443
[PP&E]                                         208,877
[DEPRECIATION]                                  79,014
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                                 192,112
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                           56,108
[BONDS]                                          1,125
[COMMON]                                         1,429
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                            1,927
[PREFERRED]                                          0
[OTHER-SE]                                     126,915
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                   192,112
[SALES]                                         71,416
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                                72,522
[CGS]                                           37,401
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                   67,772
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                                     0
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                     0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                                 713
[INCOME-PRETAX]                                  4,266
[INCOME-TAX]                                     1,701
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                              2,565
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                                     2,565
[EPS-PRIMARY]                                      .21
[EPS-DILUTED]                                      .21
</TABLE>
Exhibit 16.1

                                         [LOGO AND LETTERHEAD] JAMES MOORE & CO.

                                                 October 10, 2001

Mr. Philip Lacqua
R-Tec Technologies, Inc.
37 Ironica Road
Flander, NJ 07836

Dear Mr. Lacqua:

This  is  to  confirm  that  the  client-auditor   relationship   between  R-Tec
Technologies,  Inc.  (Commission  File Number  333-72405) and James Moore & Co.,
P.L. has ceased.  We have read the  responses to item 304(a) in the amendment to
Form 8-K filed October 10, 2001 and agree with those responses.

                                                 Sincerely,

                                                 JAMES MOORE & CO., P.L.

                                                 By: /s/ Carol Villemaire
                                                     --------------------
                                                     Carol Villemaire

CAV/dh

cc: Office of the Chief Accountant
    SECPS Letter File
    Securities and Exchange Commission
    Mail Stop 9-5
    450 Fifth Street
    Washington, D.C. 20549
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Ambassadors International, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, Joseph J. Ueberroth, Chief Executive Officer of the Company
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a-14(b)
or 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. /s/ Joseph J. Ueberroth  
 57
§ 800.10 Contact lens solutions; sterility. ( a ) ( 1 ) Informed medical opinion is in agreement that all preparations offered or intended for ophthalmic use, including contact lens solutions, should be sterile. It is further evident that such preparations purport to be of such purity and quality as to be suitable for safe use in the eye.
( 2 ) The Food and Drug Administration concludes that all such preparations, if they are not sterile, fall below their professed standard of purity or quality and may be unsafe. In a statement of policy issued on September 1, 1964, the Food and Drug Administration ruled that liquid preparations offered or intended for ophthalmic use that are not sterile may be regarded as adulterated within the meaning of section 501(c) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act), and, further, may be deemed misbranded within the meaning of section 502(j) of the act. By this regulation, this ruling is applicable to all preparations for ophthalmic use that are regulated as medical devices, i.e., contact lens solutions. By the regulation in § 200.50 of this chapter, this ruling is applicable to ophthalmic preparations that are regulated as drugs.
( 3 ) The containers shall be sterile at the time of filling and closing, and the container or individual carton shall be so sealed that the contents cannot be used without destroying the seal. The packaging and labeling of these solutions shall also comply with § 800.12 on tamper-resistant packaging requirements.
( b ) Liquid ophthalmic preparations packed in multiple-dose containers should: ( 1 ) Contain one or more suitable and harmless substances that will inhibit the growth of microorganisms; or
( 2 ) Be so packaged as to volume and type of container and so labeled as to duration of use and with such necessary warnings as to afford adequate protection and minimize the hazard of injury resulting from contamination during use.
( c ) Eye cups, eye droppers, and other dispensers intended for ophthalmic use should be sterile, and may be regarded as falling below their professed standard of purity or quality if they are not sterile. These articles, which are regulated as medical devices unless packaged with the drugs with which they are to be used, should be packaged so as to maintain sterility until the package is opened and be labeled, on or within the retail package, so as to afford adequate directions and necessary warnings to minimize the hazard of injury resulting from contamination during use.
[47 FR 50455, Nov. 5, 1982]
December 23, 1996

                                                                      (logo) EDS

                       Consumer Asset Management Division
                       of Electronic Data Systems Corporation
                       Management Report



The  management of the Consumer  Asset  Management  Division of Electronic  Data
Systems  Corporation  (the Division) has the  responsibility  for the Division's
compliance  with  the  minimum  servicing  standards  in  the  Mortgage  Bankers
Association of America's UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM FOR MORTGAGE BANKERS
(the USAP) for the nine months ended September 30, 1996 and for establishing and
maintaining  an  effective  internal  control  structure  over  compliance.   In
addition,  as of and for the same period noted above, the Division had in effect
a fidelity bond and errors and omissions policy in the amount of $ 10,000,000.

Management  has performed an evaluation of the  Division's  compliance  with the
requirements  and for the period  referred to above.  Based on this  assessment,
management  asserts that the division  has complied  with the minimum  servicing
requirements in the USAP for the nine months ended September, 1996.

Sincerely,
/s/ Samuel C. Brenize
Samuel C. Brenize
Executive Vice President
Consumer Asset Management Division
§ 582.5697 Riboflavin-5-phosphate. ( a ) *Product.* Riboflavin-5-phosphate.
( b ) *Conditions of use.* This substance is generally recognized as safe when used in accordance with good manufacturing or feeding practice.
# C_2017195EN.01001702.xml

| 19.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 195/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 195/17

---

Judgment of the General Court of 4 May 2017 — Meta Group v Commission

(Case T-744/14) (1)

1

((Arbitration clause - Grant agreements concluded within the context of the Sixth framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2002-2006) - Grant agreements concluded under the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (2007-2013) - Recovery of sums paid - Balance of the total amount of the financial contribution granted to the applicant - Eligible costs - Contractual liability))

(2017/C 195/23)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Meta Group Srl (Rome, Italy) (represented by: A. Bartolini and A. Formica, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Recchia and R. Lyal, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action based on Article 272 TFEU and seeking a ruling that the Commission failed to fulfil its financial obligations resulting from several grant agreements which it concluded with the applicant under the Sixth framework programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities, contributing to the creation of the European Research Area and to innovation (2002 to 2006) and the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (2007-2013), a declaration that the Commission acted unlawfully in offsetting the amounts claimed by the applicant, an order for payment by the Commission of the sums owed to the applicant under those grant agreements, together with default interest and monetary revaluation, and compensation in respect of the damage which the applicant claims to have suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Meta Group Srl to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Meta Group Srl to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 462, 22.12.2014.

1

---
[Letterhead of BDO McCabe Lo & Company]
Exhibit 14.1
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
Deswell Industries, Inc.
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8(File Nos. 33-97162, 333-07946 and 333-110236) of Deswell Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) of ourreport dated June 15, 2005, relating to the consolidated financial statements, appearing in theCompany’s Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2005.
**/s/BDO McCabe Lo &Company          **
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Avery Communications,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Patrick J. Haynes, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Patrick J. Haynes, III                                 
|Patrick J. Haynes, III Chief Executive Officer May 22, 2003