Executive Budget Summary 

FUNCTION 150 & 

OTHER INTERNATIONAL 

PROGRAMS 

FISCAL YEAR 2012 
 

This Page Intentionally Left Blank. 
 

 

 

Executive Budget Summary 

Table of Contents 

FY 2012 INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS REQUEST 

Statement of the Secretary of State ....................................................................1 

Summary Budget Table ......................................................................................9 

Statement of Performance ................................................................................17 

ENDURING PROGRAMS ............................................................................................19 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE AND RELATED AGENCIES 

Summary Table ..............................................................................................................20 

I. Department of State 

A. Administration of Foreign Affairs 

Diplomatic and Consular Programs .....................................................................22 

Capital Investment Fund .....................................................................................26 

Border Security Program .....................................................................................27 

Embassy Security, Construction, and Maintenance ............................................28 

Conflict Stabilization Operations ........................................................................29 

Office of Inspector General .................................................................................31 

Educational and Cultural Exchange Programs ....................................................32 

Representation Allowances .................................................................................35 

Protection of Foreign Missions and Officials ......................................................35 

Emergencies in the Diplomatic and Consular Service ........................................36 

Buying Power Maintenance Account ..................................................................36 

Repatriation Loans Program Account .................................................................37 

Payment to the American Institute in Taiwan .....................................................37 

Foreign Service Retirement and Disability Fund ................................................38 

B. International Organizations 

Contributions to International Organizations ......................................................39 

Contributions for International Peacekeeping Activities .....................................43 

C. International Commissions (Function 300) 

International Boundary and Water Commission 

IBWC -- Salaries and Expenses .............................................................45 

American Sections 

IBWC – Construction .............................................................................46 

International Joint Commission ..............................................................47 

International Boundary Commissions ....................................................47 

Border Environment Cooperation Commission .....................................48 

International Fisheries Commission ....................................................................49 

i 
 

 

D. Related Programs 

The Asia Foundation ...........................................................................................51 

Center for Middle Eastern-Western Dialogue .....................................................51 

Eisenhower Exchange Fellowship Program ........................................................52 

Israeli Arab Scholarship Program .......................................................................52 

East-West Center .................................................................................................53 

National Endowment for Democracy.................................................................. 54 

E. Related Agencies 

Broadcasting Board of Governors 

International Broadcasting Operations ...................................................55 

Broadcasting Capital Improvements ......................................................56 

United States Institute of Peace ...........................................................................57 

FOREIGN OPERATIONS AND RELATED PROGRAMS 

Summary Table ..............................................................................................................59 

II. United States Agency for International Development 

USAID Operating Expenses ................................................................................62 

USAID Capital Investment Fund ........................................................................64 

USAID Inspector General Operating Expenses ..................................................65 

III. Bilateral Economic Assistance 

A. Bilateral Economic Assistance 

Global Health and Child Survival .......................................................................66 

Development Assistance .....................................................................................72 

International Disaster Assistance ........................................................................76 

Transition Initiatives ............................................................................................77 

Complex Crises Fund ..........................................................................................78 

Development Credit Authority ............................................................................79 

Economic Support Fund ......................................................................................80 

Assistance for Europe, Eurasia and Central Asia ................................................86 

Migration and Refugee Assistance ......................................................................89 

U.S. Emergency Refugee and Migration Assistance Fund ................................ 91 

B. Independent Agencies 

Peace Corps .........................................................................................................92 

Millennium Challenge Corporation .....................................................................93 

Inter-American Foundation .................................................................................95 

African Development Foundation .......................................................................96 

C. Department of the Treasury 

Treasury Technical Assistance and Debt Restructuring ......................................97 

IV. International Security Assistance 

International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement .......................................98 

Nonproliferation, Anti-terrorism, Demining, and Related Programs ................104 

Peacekeeping Operations ..................................................................................107 

ii 
International Military Education and Training ..................................................110 

Foreign Military Financing ...............................................................................112 

Global Security Contingency Fund ...................................................................114 

Special Defense Acquisition Fund ....................................................................115 

V. Multilateral Economic Assistance ..........................................................................116 

International Organizations and Programs ........................................................117 

International Financial Institutions ....................................................................118 

VI. Export and Investment Assistance 

Export-Import Bank of the United States ..........................................................124 

Overseas Private Investment Corporation .........................................................125 

U.S. Trade and Development Agency ...............................................................126 

COMMERCE, JUSTICE, SCIENCE, AND RELATED AGENCIES 

International Trade Commission .......................................................................127 

Foreign Claims Settlement Commission ...........................................................128 

AGRICULTURE, RURAL DEVELOPMENT, FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, 

AND RELATED AGENCY 

Department of Agriculture 

Food for Peace Title II ................................................................................129 

McGovern-Dole International Food for Education .....................................130 

OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS (OCO) ...........................................131 

Summary Table ............................................................................................................132 

Overview ........................................................................................................................133 

Department of State 

Diplomatic and Consular Programs-OCO ........................................................ 134 

Office of Inspector General-OCO .....................................................................136 

Bilateral Economic Assistance 

Economic Support Fund-OCO .......................................................................................137 

International Security Assistance 

International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement–OCO .......................................139 

Foreign Military Financing-OCO ...................................................................................141 

Pakistan Counterinsurgency Capability Fund-OCO .......................................................142 

iii 
APPENDIX: ACCOUNT TABLES 

Global Health and Child Survival-USAID ........................................................147 

Global Health and Child Survival-State ............................................................150 

Development Assistance ...................................................................................152 

Economic Support Fund ....................................................................................155 

Assistance for Europe, Eurasia and the Central Asia ........................................158 

Migration and Refugee Assistance & 

Emergency Refugee and Migration Assistance Fund .................................159 

International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement ......................................160 

Nonproliferation, Anti-terrorism, Demining, and Related Programs ..................163 

Peacekeeping Operations ....................................................................................164 

International Military Education and Training ...................................................165 

Foreign Military Financing .................................................................................169 

International Organizations and Programs ..........................................................172 

iv 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THE SECRETARY OF STATE
	

WASHINGTON
	

February 14, 2011 

A year ago, I wrote that the FY2011 budget request from the State 

Department and USAID reflected a renewed commitment to use our resources 

―smartly and strategically to get the best possible results for the American people.‖ 

Since then, we have been working hard to become even more efficient and 

effective. We released a wide-ranging study, the first-ever Quadrennial Diplomacy 

and Development Review, that identified what we do well, what we could do 

better, and what we should just stop doing altogether. It is changing the way we do 

business, from the role of our Ambassadors to the way we manage contracts. 

In that spirit of responsible management, and on behalf of President Obama, 

I am pleased to submit our Fiscal Year 2012 Executive Budget Summary and 

Congressional Budget Justification. 

It is a lean budget for lean times. We have scrubbed it for every dollar of 

savings, because we know we have to make the most of our resources. This budget 

request contains the funding we need—but only the funding we need—to 

accomplish our mission and advance America’s security interests. 

This funding supports diplomats and development experts who are working 

every day to protect our national security, promote our economic growth, and 

project our values in virtually every country on Earth. They are carrying out a 

robust foreign policy that is leading the world in solving the most complex 

challenges of our time, from thwarting international terrorism to stopping the 

spread of catastrophic weapons, fixing the global economy, and advancing human 

rights and universal values. They are helping identify and prevent conflicts before 

they start. They are helping to secure nuclear materials, fight international crime, 

assist human rights defenders, restore our alliances, promote the rights of women 

and girls, and ensure global economic stability. 

This is a smart investment on the part of the American people, and one that 

pays excellent returns. The State Department and USAID budgets amount to only 

1 percent of total federal budget outlays. As our partners at the Department of 

Defense often point out, these investments save money and lives by preventing 

1
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

conflicts and helping end them more quickly. Deploying our diplomats and 

development experts is less expensive than deploying our troops. 

In a complex and rapidly changing world, America can’t afford simply to 

keep up with events; we must stay ahead of them. With the resources outlined in 

this budget, the State Department and USAID will continue to make the American 

people safer, promote economic growth at home and abroad, and project our 

interests and values. 

By including performance information throughout, this Congressional 

Budget Justification also serves as the Annual Performance Report for FY 2010 

and the Annual Performance Plan for FY 2012. 

Our request 

This year, our budget request has two components: 

1) Our extraordinary, temporary costs in Iraq, Afghanistan, and 

Pakistan. These are expenses we are incurring as our civilian employees 

take on more responsibility in these frontline states. We expect them to be 

phased out over time, as these countries rebuild and take responsibility for 

their own security. Borrowing terminology used by our colleagues at the 

Defense Department, we have identified these costs as Overseas 

Contingency Operations, or OCO. Our OCO request for FY2012 is $8.7 

billion. 

2) Our core budget. This represents our ongoing investments to 

advance America’s security and economic interests. Our core budget 

request for FY2012 is $47 billion. 

This two-pronged approach will look familiar to many business owners, who 

make their own budgets in a similar way. Separating extraordinary shorter-term 

outlays from our core ongoing expenses makes our budget more transparent. It 

also reduces overlap and duplication by aligning our spending in the frontline 

states with that of the Department of Defense. 

Our OCO request represents an increase of $3.6 billion, compared with our 

calculation of OCO costs for FY2010. This increase is in line with State and 

2
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

USAID’s growing responsibilities in the region, which I will explain in the next 

section of this letter. More importantly, it represents considerable overall savings 

for the American people. As we shift from military responsibility to civilian 

responsibility in Iraq, the Defense Department’s total OCO costs will drop by 

$45 billion in the coming fiscal year. Every business owner I know would gladly 

invest less than $4 in order to save $45. 

For our core budget—the ongoing programs that accomplish our basic 

mission of advancing America’s security and interests—our $47 billion request 

represents a 1 percent increase over the comparable FY 2010 level. 

In keeping with these tough economic times, our core budget reflects hard 

choices based on a clear view of where a dollar of funding could have the greatest 

impact. For instance, we have eliminated all the bilateral assistance programs in 

six countries compared with FY2010, and we have cut more than 50 percent from 

economic and development assistance in over 20 other countries. We have shifted 

funds into programs that save money, such as stronger monitoring and evaluation 

systems, efforts to consolidate information technology, procurement reform at 

USAID, and targeted investments in innovative development programs. 

Let me detail some of the work that our requests for OCO and core budget 

will support. 

Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan 

By the beginning of FY2012, much of the work previously done by our 

military in Iraq will have become the responsibility of State and USAID. For 

example, we will be taking over a vital police training program. We also are 

keeping civilian employees on the ground in the critical areas of Kirkuk and 

Mosul, and we have expanded the facilities at our embassy and consulates to 

support all the U.S. government agencies working in Iraq. These efforts are 

helping to secure the gains made by the U.S. military in recent years. 

Even as we take on these new tasks, we will also continue development 

assistance programs that create jobs, strengthen the agricultural sector, and help 

improve the Iraqi government’s capacity to provide essential services to its people. 

These programs are designed to work themselves out of existence. Ultimately, 

3
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

they will help the Iraqi people support themselves. Already, the Government of 

Iraq matches our assistance dollar-for-dollar. 

A similar shift will take place in Afghanistan. The Afghan government is 

taking increasing responsibility for its own security, in keeping with the goal of 

completing that transition by 2014. During this transition, our civilians are called 

to do more than ever. Civilians’ work on governance, agriculture, law 

enforcement, and development was particularly instrumental in the progress we’ve 

seen in Helmand and Kandahar, and civilians will be critical in helping us 

consolidate these gains as we move toward a transition to Afghan responsibility. 

This budget request reflects those growing responsibilities. Two years ago, our 

civilian presence there was just 320 people; for FY2012 we seek to maintain 

civilian staffing of 1,500. These personnel and programs are essential to meeting 

President Obama’s goal of disrupting, dismantling, and defeating Al-Qaida. 

Success in Afghanistan also depends on building stability across the border 

in Pakistan. While we are clear about the challenges we face there, we have made 

a long-term commitment to work with the Pakistani government on a wide range of 

issues. We are collaborating closely on security and counterterrorism because this 

work directly improves our ability to protect the American people. But we also 

know that strong democratic institutions and civil society groups will help 

Pakistanis in their fight against violent extremism. So we will support key civilian 

initiatives in energy, agriculture, education, and other sectors that affect the daily 

lives of the Pakistani people. These steps are strengthening a relationship that is 

important to our own security, as well as Pakistan’s. 

Conflict Prevention, Complex and Fragile State Support 

In addition to our work in the frontline states, we are focused on preventing 

and responding to conflict and crisis. In an interconnected world, conflict, even in 

distant countries, has become a far greater threat to the United States than ever 

before. Weak governments and failing states create safe havens for terrorists and 

insurgencies; conflicts near major economies shock distant markets and reverberate 

on Wall Street and, even more importantly, on Main Street. 

We have allocated over $4 billion for programs in a number of fragile states 

—an increase of nearly 14 percent over 2010, which we funded by moving 

resources out of programs in lower-priority countries. This will fund our civilian 

4
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

and military efforts to help stabilize Yemen, increase resources for Sudan, support 

the continued rebuilding in Haiti, and provide additional resources for democracy 

and governance programs in countries throughout Africa. 

Our budget also sustains our commitment to key partners like Israel, Jordan, 

and Mexico. 

The events of recent weeks offer a powerful reminder that we can’t predict 

where every crisis will occur. So in addition to maintaining the Complex Crisis 

Fund, we have created a small but innovative pilot program—supported with 

additional commitments from the Department of Defense—that will allow us to 

respond jointly to unforeseen events by deploying resources quickly. This is a 

perfect example of the way we are coordinating our efforts and becoming more 

flexible, so we can make the most of every dollar from the American taxpayer. 

Human and Economic Security 

Our national security depends on our ability to deal with the urgent and the 

long-term, all at the same time. So, even as we work to prevent and respond to 

urgent conflicts, we are also responding to longer-term challenges to human and 

economic security. These efforts—fighting disease and hunger, responding to 

climate change, and more—support the rise of capable new players who can help 

us solve regional and global problems and help protect our nation’s security. We 

will not end hunger or stop climate change in the next year, but making progress 

on these long-term challenges produces tangible benefits for the American people 

and for people around the world. 

One of our priorities is health, a sector where we have traditionally seen 

bipartisan support. Poor health destabilizes entire countries. HIV strips societies 

of their police and army, farmers, teachers, and health workers and leaves behind 

millions of orphans. But countries with healthy populations are far more likely to 

remain stable. Through the Global Health Initiative, we will target our funding to 

our highest priorities – from HIV to maternal and child health – while also helping 

developing countries build their capacity to help their own people. And to achieve 

even greater efficiency, we are identifying programs that used to operate in 

individual silos and tying them together in an integrated, coordinated system of 

care. We will save money and save lives. 

5
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A second priority is hunger. Countries where under-nutrition is rampant are 

much more likely to suffer from violence and instability. Since 2007, when global 

food prices skyrocketed, there have been riots over food in more than 60 countries. 

But we know we can’t fight hunger in far-flung places from our desks in 

Washington, D.C. So we are focusing our efforts on country-led strategies—plans 

designed and executed by local experts who know their countries best. We are also 

investing in innovative research and extension programs that help farmers grow 

more food and earn more money, which addresses the root causes of hunger and 

poverty while expanding markets. 

The third priority is climate change. Helping countries adapt to the effects 

of changing temperatures and sea levels has a double benefit: It is good for them, 

and for us. They are more likely to grow their economies and become better 

trading partners. We made good progress in 2010 at the environmental summits in 

Copenhagen and Cancun. To build on this progress, we will act as a catalyst for 

private investment in clean energy technology, promote sustainable landscapes, 

and help developing countries adapt to the effects of climate change. Along with 

the Treasury Department’s request and direct loans from OPIC, our request will 

allow us to meet our commitment to help mobilize climate financing and reduce 

greenhouse gas emissions. 

Our final priority is humanitarian relief that responds to natural disasters, 

conflict, and forced migration. When the devastating earthquake hit Haiti in 2010, 

we supported relief workers who helped find survivors, supplied food and shelter, 

and offered lifesaving health care. Providing humanitarian relief is in our interests, 

and it is consistent with our national values. 

In all our efforts, we are focused especially on elevating the role of women 

and girls. As President Obama’s National Security Strategy points out, women are 

critical to advancing social, economic, and political progress. They are also a 

terrific return on investment: numerous studies have shown that when women 

receive schooling or the boost of a small loan, they flourish, their children flourish, 

and so does the greater community. 

Our Workforce 

We have ambitious goals, to match a wide-ranging set of challenges. Doing 

this work takes talented people with the resources they need to do their jobs. 

6
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unfortunately, both State and USAID have historically been unable to hire enough 

in-house experts and had to rely too much on contractors. The Government 

Accountability Office has raised concerns about insufficient staffing at embassies 

and consulates, long vacancies in key positions, and inadequate expertise in foreign 

languages. Former Secretaries of State Powell and Rice began building up both 

agencies, and President Obama and I are continuing that effort wholeheartedly. 

But building civilian power is not a short-term effort, and it can’t be done in 

one budget cycle. This budget includes the addition of 197 State Department 

positions, which represents gradual growth of our full-time Foreign Service and 

Civil Service—only 1 percent—and allows us to focus our new hires on the 

highest-priority countries and programs. For USAID, the budget will support 165 

new positions to manage our highest-priority development programs and reform 

the way USAID procures goods and services, allowing us to deliver aid more 

effectively and at a lower cost. 

I know this is a tough time to be requesting even a small growth in staff. 

But these positions are essential to building our civilian capacity and advancing the 

interests of the American people. 

President Obama has asked the State Department and USAID to accomplish 

more through diplomacy and development than ever before. I am confident that 

we are up to the challenge. We have a President who sees the world as it is, while 

never losing sight of the world as it should be; a global corps of dedicated 

diplomats and development experts; and a country—open and innovative, 

determined and devoted to our core values—that can, must and will lead in this 

new century. 

I look forward to working with all of you to make the best use of our 

resources as we advance America’s interests around the world. 

Hillary Rodham Clinton 

Secretary of State 

7
 

This Page Intentionally Left Blank. 

8
' 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

STATE OPERATIONS and FOREIGN ASSISTANCE REQUEST 

($000) 

FY 2010 Enacted1 FY 2010 Actual 

Total2 FY 2011 CR3 FY 2012 President s 

Request 

Change from FY 

2010 Enacted to FY 

2012 Request 

ENDURING INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS (150 Account) and 

International Commissions 51,184,575 49,905,449 50,951,998 52,768,832 1,584,257 

Without International Commissions 51,041,741 49,762,615 50,809,164 52,648,054 1,606,313 

Adjusted Enduring Total - State Department and 

USAID (including 300) 46,553,918 45,271,792 46,336,111 47,033,444 479,526 

STATE OPERATIONS & RELATED ACCOUNTS 14,623,549 14,743,423 14,545,709 14,963,611 340,062 

STATE OPERATIONS 13,827,919 13,944,793 13,750,079 14,153,841 325,922 

Administration of Foreign Affairs 9,715,835 9,736,209 9,637,995 10,362,212 646,377

 State Programs 7,008,886 7,022,540 7,025,546 7,695,202 686,316

 Diplomatic and Consular Programs 6,869,886 6,883,540 6,886,546 7,570,202 700,316

 Ongoing Operations 5,456,523 5,483,552 5,484,520 6,116,472 659,949

 Worldwide Security Protection 1,413,363 1,399,988 1,402,026 1,453,730 40,367

 Capital Investment Fund 139,000 139,000 139,000 125,000 (14,000)

 Embassy Security, Construction, and Maintenance 1,815,050 1,817,550 1,724,150 1,801,517 (13,533)

 Ongoing Operations 967,750 970,250 876,850 863,317 (104,433)

 Worldwide Security Upgrades 847,300 847,300 847,300 938,200 90,900

 Other Administration of Foreign Affairs 891,899 896,119 888,299 865,493 (26,406)

 Conflict Stabilization Operations (CSO)5 120,000 80,000 120,000 92,200 (27,800)

 Office of the Inspector General 59,600 59,600 56,000 65,154 5,554

 Educational and Cultural Exchange Programs 635,000 635,000 635,000 637,100 2,100

 Representation Allowances 8,175 8,536 8,175 8,175 -

 Protection of Foreign Missions and Officials 28,000 28,000 28,000 27,744 (256)

 Emergencies in the Diplomatic and Consular Services 10,000 29,423 10,000 10,000 -

 Buying Power Maintenance Account 8,500 30,500 8,500 - (8,500)

 Repatriation Loans Program Account 1,450 1,902 1,450 1,800 350 

9
' 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

STATE OPERATIONS and FOREIGN ASSISTANCE REQUEST 

($000)

FY 2010 Enacted1 FY 2010 Actual 

Total2 FY 2011 CR3 FY 2012 President s 

Request 

Change from FY 

2010 Enacted to FY 

2012 Request 

 Payment to the American Institute in Taiwan 21,174 23,158 21,174 23,320 2,146

 Foreign Service Retirement and Disability Fund [158,900] [158,900] [158,900] [158,900] -

International Organizations 3,807,500 3,904,000 3,807,500 3,539,400 (268,100)

 Contributions to International Organizations (CIO) 1,682,500 1,682,500 1,682,500 1,619,400 (63,100)

 Contributions for International Peacekeeping Activities (CIPA) 2,125,000 2,221,500 2,125,000 1,920,000 (205,000) 

Related Programs 161,750 161,750 161,750 131,451 (30,299)

 The Asia Foundation 19,000 19,000 19,000 14,906 (4,094)

 Center for Middle Easter-Western Dialogue 875 875 875 840 (35)

 Eisenhower Exchange Fellowship Program 500 500 500 500 -

 Israeli Arab Scholarship Program 375 375 375 375 -

 East-West Center 23,000 23,000 23,000 10,830 (12,170)

 National Endowment for Democracy 118,000 118,000 118,000 104,000 (14,000) 

International Commissions (Function 300) 142,834 142,834 142,834 120,778 (22,056)

 International Boundary and Water Commission - Salaries and Expenses 33,000 33,000 33,000 45,591 12,591

 International Boundary and Water Commission - Construction 43,250 43,250 43,250 31,900 (11,350)

 American Sections 12,608 12,608 12,608 11,996 (612)

 International Joint Commission 8,000 8,000 8,000 7,237 (763)

 International Boundary Commission 2,359 2,359 2,359 2,422 63

 Border Environment Cooperation Commission 2,249 2,249 2,249 2,337 88

 International Fisheries Commissions 53,976 53,976 53,976 31,291 (22,685) 

Broadcasting Board of Governors 746,410 749,410 746,410 767,030 20,620

 International Broadcasting Operations 733,788 736,788 733,788 754,261 20,473

 Broadcasting Capital Improvements 12,622 12,622 12,622 12,769 147 

Other Programs 49,220 49,220 49,220 42,740 (6,480)

 United States Institute of Peace 49,220 49,220 49,220 42,740 (6,480) 

10
' 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

STATE OPERATIONS and FOREIGN ASSISTANCE REQUEST 

($000) 

FY 2010 Enacted1 FY 2010 Actual 

Total2 FY 2011 CR3 FY 2012 President s 

Request 

Change from FY 

2010 Enacted to FY 

2012 Request 

FOREIGN OPERATIONS 34,661,526 33,262,526 34,506,789 35,905,721 1,244,195 

U.S Agency for International Development 1,653,700 1,623,700 1,650,300 1,744,120 90,420

 USAID Operating Expense (OE) 1,388,800 1,388,800 1,388,800 1,503,420 114,620

 Conflict Stabilization Operations (CSO)5 30,000 - 30,000 - (30,000)

 USAID Capital Investment Fund (CIF) 185,000 185,000 185,000 189,200 4,200

 USAID Inspector General Operating Expenses 49,900 49,900 46,500 51,500 1,600 

Bilateral Economic Assistance 20,476,799 20,424,230 20,201,232 20,873,983 397,184

 Global Health and Child Survival (USAID and State) 7,829,000 7,782,600 7,779,000 8,715,500 886,500

 Global Health and Child Survival - USAID6 [2,470,000] [2,423,600] [2,420,000] [3,073,600] [557,300]

 Global Health and Child Survival - State [5,359,000] [5,359,000] [5,359,000] [5,641,900] [284,200]

 Development Assistance (DA) 2,520,000 2,520,000 2,520,000 2,918,002 398,002

 International Disaster Assistance (IDA) 845,000 845,000 845,000 860,700 15,700

 Transition Initiatives (TI) 55,000 55,000 55,000 56,000 1,000

 Complex Crises Fund (CCF) 50,000 50,000 50,000 75,000 25,000

 Development Credit Authority - Subsidy (DCA) [25,000] [25,000] [25,000] [50,000] [25,000]

 Development Credit Authority - Administrative Expenses 8,600 8,600 8,600 8,300 (300)

 Economic Support Fund (ESF)7 6,569,567 6,563,398 6,344,000 5,968,663 (600,904)

 Democracy Fund 120,000 120,000 120,000 - (120,000)

 Assistance for Europe, Eurasia and Central Asia (AEECA) 741,632 741,632 741,632 626,718 (114,914)

 Migration and Refugee Assistance (MRA) 1,693,000 1,693,000 1,693,000 1,613,100 (79,900)

 U.S. Emergency Refugee and Migration Assistance (ERMA) 45,000 45,000 45,000 32,000 (13,000) 

Independent Agencies 1,558,000 1,558,000 1,558,000 1,607,800 49,800

 Peace Corps 400,000 400,000 400,000 439,600 39,600

 Millennium Challenge Corporation 1,105,000 1,105,000 1,105,000 1,125,100 20,100

 Inter-American Foundation 23,000 23,000 23,000 19,100 (3,900)

 African Development Foundation 30,000 30,000 30,000 24,000 (6,000) 

Department of Treasury 85,000 85,000 85,000 45,120 (39,880)

 Treasury Technical Assistance 25,000 25,000 25,000 30,120 5,120

 Debt Restructuring 60,000 60,000 60,000 15,000 (45,000) 

11
' 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

STATE OPERATIONS and FOREIGN ASSISTANCE REQUEST 

($000) 

FY 2010 Enacted1 FY 2010 Actual 

Total2 FY 2011 CR3 FY 2012 President s 

Request 

Change from FY 

2010 Enacted to FY 

2012 Request 

International Security Assistance 8,511,500 7,198,669 8,650,500 8,222,795 (288,705)

 International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement (INCLE) 1,848,000 1,754,000 1,597,000 1,511,838 (336,162)

 Nonproliferation, Antiterrorism, Demining and Related Programs (NADR) 754,000 754,000 754,000 708,540 (45,460)

 Peacekeeping Operations (PKO) 331,500 331,500 331,500 292,000 (39,500)

 International Military Education and Training (IMET) 108,000 108,000 108,000 109,954 1,954

 Foreign Military Financing (FMF)7 5,470,000 4,251,169 5,160,000 5,550,463 80,463

 Pakistan Counterinsurgency Capability Fund (PCCF) - - 700,000 - -

 Global Security Contingency Fund - - - 50,000 50,000

 Special Defense Acquisition Fund - - - - -

Multilateral Economic Assistance 2,437,670 2,434,070 2,437,670 3,667,519 1,229,849

 International Organizations and Programs6 394,000 390,400 394,000 348,705 (45,295) 

International Financial Institutions (IFIs) 2,043,670 2,043,670 2,043,670 3,318,814 1,275,144

 Global Environment Facility (GEF) 86,500 86,500 86,500 143,750 57,250

 International Clean Technology Fund 300,000 300,000 300,000 400,000 100,000

 International Development Association 1,262,500 1,262,500 1,262,500 1,358,500 96,000

 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development - - - 117,364 117,364

 Inter-American Development Bank - - - 102,018 102,018

 Enterprise for the Americas Multilateral Investment Fund 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 -

 Inter-American Investment Corporation 4,670 4,670 4,670 20,429 15,759

 Asian Development Fund 105,000 105,000 105,000 115,250 10,250

 African Development Bank - - - 32,418 32,418

 African Development Fund 155,000 155,000 155,000 195,000 40,000

 European Bank of Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) Trust Fund - - - - -

 European Bank of Reconstruction and Development - - - - -

 International Fund for Agricultural Development 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 -

 Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency - - - - -

 Asian Development Bank - - - 106,586 106,586

 Global Agriculture and Food Security Program - - - 308,000 308,000

 Strategic Climate Fund 75,000 75,000 75,000 190,000 115,000

 Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative - - - 174,500 174,500 

12
' 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

STATE OPERATIONS and FOREIGN ASSISTANCE REQUEST 

($000) 

FY 2010 Enacted1 FY 2010 Actual 

Total2 FY 2011 CR3 FY 2012 President s 

Request 

Change from FY 

2010 Enacted to FY 

2012 Request 

Export & Investment Assistance (145,120) (145,120) (159,890) (344,740) (199,620)

 Export-Import Bank 2,380 2,380 2,500 (212,900) (215,280)

 Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC) (202,700) (202,700) (217,590) (188,110) 14,590

 Trade and Development Agency 55,200 55,200 55,200 56,270 1,070 

Related International Affairs Accounts 83,977 83,977 83,977 89,124 5,147

 International Trade Commission 81,860 81,860 81,860 87,000 5,140

 Foreign Claims Settlement Commission 2,117 2,117 2,117 2,124 7 

Department of Agriculture 1,899,500 1,899,500 1,899,500 1,899,500 -

 Food for Peace Act Title II 1,690,000 1,690,000 1,690,000 1,690,000 -

 McGovern-Dole International Food for Education [Non-Add] 209,500 209,500 209,500 209,500 -

13
' 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

STATE OPERATIONS and FOREIGN ASSISTANCE REQUEST 

($000) 

FY 2010 Enacted1 FY 2010 Actual 

Total2 FY 2011 CR3 FY 2012 President s 

Request 

Change from FY 

2010 Enacted to FY 

2012 Request 

OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS (OCO) TOTAL ­

STATE OPERATIONS and FOREIGN ASSISTANCE 5,084,922 4,665,468 1,760,454 8,702,787 3,617,865 

STATE OPERATIONS - OCO 3,040,489 2,621,035 1,760,454 4,386,187 1,345,698 

Administration of Foreign Affairs 3,040,489 2,621,035 1,760,454 4,386,187 1,345,698

 State Programs 2,987,489 2,575,035 1,714,454 4,323,255 1,335,766

 Diplomatic and Consular Programs 2,987,489 2,575,035 1,714,454 4,323,255 1,335,766

 Ongoing Operations 2,801,263 2,388,809 1,530,266 4,076,401 1,275,138

 Worldwide Security Protection 186,226 186,226 184,188 246,854 60,628 

-

 Other Administration of Foreign Affairs 53,000 46,000 46,000 62,932 9,932

 Office of the Inspector General 53,000 46,000 46,000 62,932 9,932 

FOREIGN OPERATIONS - OCO4 2,044,433 2,044,433 - 4,316,600 2,272,167 

Bilateral Economic Assistance - OCO 1,342,433 1,342,433 - 1,216,600 (125,833)

 Economic Support Fund (ESF) 1,342,433 1,342,433 - 1,216,600 (125,833) 

International Security Assistance - OCO 702,000 702,000 - 3,100,000 2,398,000

 International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement (INCLE) 702,000 702,000 - 1,000,000 298,000

 Foreign Military Financing (FMF) - - - 1,000,000 1,000,000

 Pakistan Counterinsurgency Capability Fund (PCCF) - - - 1,100,000 1,100,000 

14
' 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

STATE OPERATIONS and FOREIGN ASSISTANCE REQUEST 

($000) 

FY 2010 Enacted1 FY 2010 Actual 

Total2 FY 2011 CR3 FY 2012 President s 

Request 

Change from FY 

2010 Enacted to FY 

2012 Request 

NON-WAR SUPPLEMENTAL FUNDING ADJUSTMENTS8 

STATE OPERATION & RELATED ACCOUNTS 248,500 3,000 - - (245,500) 

Administration of Foreign Affairs 149,000 - - - (149,000)

 State Programs 70,000 - - - (70,000)

 Diplomatic and Consular Programs 70,000 - - - (70,000)

 Ongoing Operations 70,000 - - - (70,000)

 Embassy Security, Construction, and Maintenance 79,000 - - - (79,000)

 Ongoing Operations 79,000 - - - (79,000) 

International Organizations 96,500 - - - (96,500)

 Contributions for International Peacekeeping Activities (CIPA) 96,500 - - - (96,500) 

Broadcasting Board of Governors 3,000 3,000 - - (3,000)

 International Broadcasting Operations 3,000 3,000 - - (3,000) 

FOREIGN ASSISTANCE and Food For Peace (Title II) 2,338,260 2,338,260 - - (2,119,160) 

U.S Agency for International Development 14,500 14,500 - - (14,500)

 USAID Operating Expense (OE) 10,000 10,000 - - (10,000)

 USAID Inspector General Operating Expenses 4,500 4,500 - - (4,500) 

Bilateral Economic Assistance 1,582,000 1,582,000 - - (1,582,000)

 Global Health and Child Survival (USAID and State) 45,000 45,000 (45,000)

 Global Health and Child Survival - USAID [45,000] [45,000] [-45,000]

 International Disaster Assistance (IDA) 460,000 460,000 - - (460,000)

 Economic Support Fund (ESF)7 912,000 912,000 - - (912,000)

 Migration and Refugee Assistance (MRA) 165,000 165,000 - - (165,000) 

International Security Assistance 372,660 372,660 - - (372,660)

 International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement (INCLE) 322,660 322,660 - - (322,660)

 Foreign Military Financing (FMF) 50,000 50,000 - - (50,000) 

15
' 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

STATE OPERATIONS and FOREIGN ASSISTANCE REQUEST 

($000) 

FY 2010 Enacted1 FY 2010 Actual 

Total2 FY 2011 CR3 FY 2012 President s 

Request 

Change from FY 

2010 Enacted to FY 

2012 Request 

Department of Treasury 7,100 7,100 - - (2,883,760)

 Treasury Technical Assistance 7,100 7,100 - - (7,100) 

International Financial Institutions (IFIs) 212,000 212,000 - - (2,664,660)

 Inter-American Development Bank 204,000 204,000 - - (204,000)

 International Fund for Agricultural Development 8,000 8,000 - - (8,000) 

Department of Agriculture 150,000 150,000 - - (150,000)

 Food for Peace Act Title II 150,000 150,000 - - (150,000) 

Enduring State Operation & Foreign Assistance 

(including 300) - Non-War Supplemental 2,586,760 2,341,260 - - (2,364,660) 

Footnotes 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total includes the allocations as of March 30, 2010, from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117), forward funding from the 

Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32) and supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). $1.8 billion in 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32) was designated for FY 2010 and is included in the FY 2010 Enacted level. This 

forward funding includes D&CP Ongoing Operation: $361 million; D&CP WSP: $13.38 million; ESCM: $90.9 million; GHCS: $50 million; INCLE: $94 million; 

FMF: $1,225.5 million. 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total includes the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117), 

supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), and excludes forward funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

4/ Foreign Assistance levels have not yet been allocated at the program/country level under the annualized FY 2011 CR (P.L. 111-322). 

5/ FY 2010 Actual reflects the Civilian Stabilization Operations rescission of $40 million for State and $30 million for USAID from unobligated balances provided by 

the FAA Air Transportation Modernization and Safety Improvement Act (P.L. 111-226). 

6/ The FY 2010 Actual level reflects the transfer of $3.6 million from International Organizations & Programs to Global Health and Child Survival-USAID. 

7/ The FY 2010 Actual level reflects the transfer of $6.2 million from Economic Support Fund to Foreign Military Financing. 

8/ Non-War Supplemental Adjustments represent one-time emergency funding in the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

16
 

Statement of Performance 

Performance Analysis 

The Department and USAID have made great strides to develop relevant, measureable, outcome 

indicators, and to assess progress against prior-year performance through trend data. The CBJ submission 

serves as the Department’s and USAID’s FY 2012 Annual Performance Plan and FY 2010 Annual 

Performance Report. The results of efforts to improve strategic planning and performance management 

throughout the Department and USAID, both domestically and at the Missions, are detailed in the 

accompanying State Operations and Foreign Assistance volumes of the CBJ. 

High Priority Performance Goals 

Under the leadership of Secretary Clinton, the Department of State and USAID have developed a strategic 

approach to accomplishing their share d m ission, focusing on r obust diplomacy and development as 

central co mponents to sol ving glo bal problems. In FY 20 11, t he Departm ent of State and USAID 

selected eight outcom e-focused high priority performance goals (HPPGs) that reflected the Secretary ’s 

and USAID Administrator’s highest priorities. These goals refl ect the agen cies’ strategi c and budge t 

priorities and will continue to be of pa rticular focus for the two agencies through FY 2012. The table 

below lists each HPPG by Strategic Goal. 

At-A-Glance: High Priority Performance Goals (HPPGs) 

Strategic Goal FY 2011 High Priority Performance Goal 

Achieving Peace and Security 

 The Afghanistan and Pakistan priority goal is: See Stabilization Strategy, 

February 2010. 

 The Iraq priority goal is: A Sovereign, Stable, and Self-Reliant Iraq. 

 The Global Security – Nuclear Nonproliferation priority goal is: Improve global 

controls to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and enable the secure, peaceful 

use of nuclear energy. 

Governing Justly and 

Democratically 

 The Democracy, Good Governance, and Human Rights priority goal is: To 

promote greater adherence to universal standards of human rights, strengthen 

democratic institutions, and facilitate accountable governance through diplomacy 

and assistance, by supporting activists in 14 authoritarian and closed societies and 

by providing training assistance to 120,000 civil society and government officials in 

23 priority emerging and consolidating democracies between October 1, 2009 and 

September 30, 2011. 

Investing in People 

 The Global Health priority goal is: By 2011, countries receiving health assistance 

will better address priority health needs of women and children, with progress 

measured by USG and UNICEF-collected data and indicators. Longer term, by 

2015, the Global Health Initiative aims to reduce mortality of mothers and children 

under five, saving millions of lives; avert millions of unintended pregnancies; 

prevent millions of new HIV infections; and eliminate some neglected tropical 

diseases. 

17
 

Strategic Goal FY 2011 High Priority Performance Goal 

Promoting Economic Growth 

and Prosperity 

 The Climate Change priority goal is: By the end of 2011, U.S. assistance will have 

supported the establishment of at least 12 work programs to support the 

development of Low Emission Development Strategies (LEDS) that contain 

concrete actions. This effort will lay the groundwork for at least 20 completed 

LEDS by the end of 2013 and meaningful reductions in national emissions 

trajectories through 2020. 

 The Food Security priority goal is: By 2011up to five countries will demonstrate 

the necessary political commitment and implementation capacities to effectively 

launch implementation of comprehensive food security plans that will track 

progress towards the country’s Millennium Development Goal (MDG1) to halve 

poverty and hunger by 2015. 

Strengthening Consular and 

Management Capabilities 

 The Management – Building Civilian Capacity priority goal is: Strengthen the 

civilian capacity of the State Department and USAID to conduct diplomacy and 

development activities in support of the Nation’s foreign policy goals by strategic 

management of personnel, effective skills training, and targeted hiring. 

Program Evaluation 

The Department of State recognizes that comprehensive program evaluation and performance 

management are essential in securing foreign policy objectives. Nuclear proliferation, climate change, 

global pandemics and terrorism are some of the perennial, complex issues the United States faces. 

Program evaluations determine the effectiveness and impact of efforts to influence or mitigate some of 

the most significant challenges facing the United States while leading to more informed strategic and 

budgetary decisions. 

In the fall of 2010, the Department implemented a new Program Evaluation Policy which supports the 

White House’s initiative to increase transparency and improve government performance and 

accountability. The policy sets forth the foundation for a coordinated and robust evaluation function and 

provides the framework for the ongoing and systematic analysis of programs and projects. Together with 

tools developed to help design and implement quality evaluations, this policy advances the Department’s 

efforts to build capacity in assessing program impact, learn and share information about effective 

practices in its programs, and provide solid evidence for policy and planning decisions. A summary of 

State and USAID program evaluations are detailed in the accompanying State Operations and Foreign 

Assistance volumes of the CBJ. 

18
FY 2012 INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS 

ENDURING PROGRAMS 

19
 

 

 

Department of State 

Summary of Appropriations 

Base Budget (1) 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 

FY 2011 

CR (2) 

FY 2012 

Request 

Administration of Foreign Affairs 9,715,835 9,736,209 9,637,995 10,362,212 

State Programs 7,008,886 7,022,540 7,025,546 7,695,202 

Diplomatic and Consular Programs 6,869,886 6,883,540 6,886,546 7,570,202 

Ongoing Operations (3) 5,456,523 5,483,552 5,484,520 6,116,472 

Worldwide Security Protection 1,413,363 1,399,988 1,402,026 1,453,730 

Capital Investment Fund 139,000 139,000 139,000 125,000 

Embassy Security, Construction, and Maintenance 1,815,050 1,817,550 1,724,150 1,801,517 

Ongoing Operations (4) 967,750 970,250 876,850 863,317 

Worldwide Security Upgrades 847,300 847,300 847,300 938,200 

Other Administration of Foreign Affairs 891,899 896,119 888,299 865,493 

Conflict Stabilization Operations (5) 120,000 80,000 120,000 92,200 

Office of Inspector General (6) 59,600 59,600 56,000 65,154 

Educational and Cultural Exchange Programs 635,000 635,000 635,000 637,100 

Representation Allowances (7) 8,175 8,536 8,175 8,175 

Protection of Foreign Missions and Officials 28,000 28,000 28,000 27,744 

Emergencies in the Diplomatic and Consular 

Service (8) 10,000 29,423 10,000 10,000 

Buying Power Maintenance Account (9) 8,500 30,500 8,500 -

Repatriation Loans Program Account (10) 1,450 1,902 1,450 1,800 

Payment to the American Institute in Taiwan (11) 21,174 23,158 21,174 23,320 

Foreign Service Retirement and Disability Fund 

 (Mandatory, non-add) (12) 158,900 158,900 158,900 158,900 

International Organizations 3,807,500 3,904,000 3,807,500 3,539,400 

Contributions to International Organizations 1,682,500 1,682,500 1,682,500 1,619,400 

Contributions for International Peacekeeping 

Activities (13) 2,125,500 2,221,500 2,125,000 1,920,000 

International Commissions (Function 300) 142,834 142,834 142,834 120,778 

International Boundary and Water Commission - 

Salaries and Expenses 33,000 33,000 33,000 45,591 

International Boundary and Water Commission - 

Construction 43,250 43,250 43,250 31,900 

American Sections 12,608 12,608 12,608 11,996 

International Joint Commission 8,000 8,000 8,000 7,237 

International Boundary Commission 2,359 2,359 2,359 2,433 

Border Environment Cooperation Commission 2,249 2,249 2,249 2,326 

International Fisheries Commissions 53,976 53,976 53,976 31,291 

20
 

 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 

FY 2011 

CR (2) 

FY 2012 

Request 

Related Programs 161,750 161,750 161,750 131,451 

The Asia Foundation 19,000 19,000 19,000 14,906 

Center for Middle Eastern-Western Dialogue 875 875 875 840 

Eisenhower Exchange Fellowship Program 500 500 500 500 

Israeli Arab Scholarship Program 375 375 375 375 

East-West Center 23,000 23,000 23,000 10,830 

National Endowment for Democracy 118,000 118,000 118,000 104,000 

Total, Department of State Appropriations 13,827,919 13,944,793 13,750,079 14,153,841 

(1) Summary of Appropriations Base Budget table excludes funding for Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO), which is 

shown in a separate OCO table. 

(2) FY 2011 CR column represents the annualized amount provided by the Continuing Appropriations and Surface 

Transportation Extensions Act, 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

(3) FY 2010 Actual reflects the following transfers out: $51.454 million to other agencies for Afghanistan operations; $22.0 

million to Buying Power Maintenance Account; $14.4 million to Embassy Security, Construction, and Maintenance, of which 

$6.9 million is for the American Center Rangoon, Burma, and $7.5 million is for new residential leases; $1.984 million to 

Payment to the American Institute in Taiwan; and $361,000 to Representation Allowances. FY 2010 Actual includes $1.322 

billion provided by the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), net of $3.7 million transferred to Emergencies in 

the Diplomatic and Consular Service and $175,000 transferred to Repatriation Loans Program Account. 

(4) FY 2010 Actual includes $14.4 million transferred from Diplomatic and Consular Programs, with $6.9 million for the 

American Center Rangoon, Burma, and $7.5 million for new residential leases. FY 2010 Actual also includes $79.0 million 

provided by the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

(5) Formerly known as Civilian Stabilization Initiative, this appropriation has been renamed Conflict Stabilization Operations. 

FY 2010 Actual reflects the rescission of $40.0 million from unobligated balances, as enacted in the FAA Air Transportation 

Modernization and Safety Improvement Act (P.L. 111-226). 

(6) FY 2010 Actual includes $2.0 million transferred from the Economic Support Fund appropriation to the Department of State 

Office of Inspector General. 

(7) FY 2010 Actual includes $361,000 transferred from Diplomatic and Consular Programs. 

(8) FY 2010 Actual includes $16.0 million in unobligated balances transferred from Diplomatic and Consular Programs as 

provided by the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2008 (P.L. 110-161). FY 

2010 Actual also includes $3.7 million transferred from Diplomatic and Consular Programs funding provided by the 

Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). FY 2010 Actual further reflects the transfer of $277,000 to Repatriation 

Loans Program Account. 

(9) FY 2010 Actual includes $22.0 million transferred from Diplomatic and Consular Programs. 

(10) FY 2010 Actual includes $175,000 transferred from Diplomatic and Consular Programs funding provided by the 

Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212) and $277,000 transferred from Emergencies in the Diplomatic and 

Consular Service. 

(11) FY 2010 Actual includes $1.984 million transferred from Diplomatic and Consular Programs. 

(12) FY 2010 Actual, FY 2011 CR, and FY 2012 Request include mandatory funding for both the Department of State and the 

United States Agency for International Development. 

(13) FY 2010 Actual includes $96.5 million provided by the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

21
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diplomatic and Consular Programs 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

Ongoing Operations 5,456,523 5,483,552 5,484,520 6,116,472 

Worldwide Security Protection 1,413,363 1,399,988 1,402,026 1,453,730 

Diplomatic and Consular Programs 6,869,886 6,883,540 6,886,546 7,570,202 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117) and supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The FY 2012 base budget request for Diplomatic and Consular Programs (D&CP) - the State 

Department’s principal operating appropriation - totals $7.570 billion. The request provides 

core funding for the people, platform, and programs necessary to conduct official U.S. relations 

with foreign governments and international organizations, as well as to provide services to 

American citizens, support U.S. businesses, and reach foreign audiences through public 

diplomacy. The funding enables the Department to fulfill its mandates as a national security 

institution and engage globally to advance American interests and values. 

D&CP - Ongoing Operations 

The D&CP request provides $6.116 billion for Ongoing Operations. This funding supports 

essential diplomatic and consular personnel and programs worldwide. It also supports the 

infrastructure for USG agencies and employees at more than 270 diplomatic posts in over 180 

countries around the globe. 

Of the request total, $446 million is required to maintain current services, while $186 million 

will fund program changes. The current services request includes $334 million for the 

restoration of consular operations funding for existing consular related activities supporting the 

delivery of consular services including visa, passport and American citizen services. In 

addition, the current services request reflects a reduction of $66 million in efficiency savings 

adjustments in support of the President’s message on fiscal discipline and spending restraint. 

The Administration is pursuing an aggressive Government-wide effort to curb administrative 

spending. In FY 2012, all agencies will be required to participate in the Accountable 

Government Initiative to reduce these expenses. In accordance with this initiative, the 

efficiency savings adjustments assume reductions to advisory contracts, travel of people and 

things, printing; and supplies. 

The request includes $59 million to build civilian capacity. Given the expanded role the 

Department is being asked to assume in critical countries and the demands of engaging new 

centers of influence, strengthening civilian power is a cost-effective necessity. The requested 

funding will continue to build a workforce staffed and prepared to step up alongside their 

military colleagues. For FY 2012, funding will support 184 new State Department positions, 

including 127 Foreign Service positions and 57 Civil Service positions. This gradual growth 

allows the Department to focus resources on countries and programs of the highest priority and 

is coupled with examination of diplomatic reforms by the Quadrennial Diplomacy and 

Development Review (QDDR). 

22
 

 

 

 

 

The request includes base budget funding for increased State Department engagement in the 

frontline states of Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan. The request includes $547 million to 

support ongoing responsibilities and enduring programs there that are long-term in nature. 

The request includes $536 million for public diplomacy to further U.S. foreign policy goals by 

informing and influencing foreign opinion. Public diplomacy efforts include countering 

misinformation about U.S. society and policies, strengthening relationships between 

Americans and foreign publics, and shaping worldwide information campaigns on issues such 

as climate change, food security, water, and global health. 

D&CP - Worldwide Security Protection 

The D&CP request provides $1.454 billion for Worldwide Security Protection (WSP) to help 

ensure the security of diplomatic personnel, property, and information. WSP funding supports 

ongoing core functions such as the worldwide local guard program, high threat protection 

needs, security technology, armored vehicles, cyber security, and diplomatic couriers. The 

funding will address security challenges in dangerous places where diplomatic operations on 

the ground may be most urgently needed. The request includes $76 million to support ongoing 

responsibilities and enduring programs in Afghanistan and Pakistan. 

WSP funding also supports the Department’s role as the lead Federal agency in the 

development of a national strategy to combat visa and passport fraud. 

Resource Detail - Funding Categories for D&CP 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 

FY 2011 

CR 

FY 2012 

Request 

Human Resources 2,354,349 2,335,187 2,628,275 

American Salaries, Central Account 2,152,771 2,133,609 2,364,734 

Public Diplomacy American Salaries (non-add) 138,075 138,075 140,314 

WSP Current Services American Salaries 

(non-add) 

220,840 211,180 211,815 

Human Resources 105,947 105,947 108,494 

Foreign Service Institute 95,631 95,631 94,087 

Human Resources Initiative - - 31,771 

Prior Year Foreign Service Pay Annualization - - 29,189 

Overseas Programs 3,218,908 2,168,768 2,424,318 

African Affairs 212,973 223,467 239,181 

East Asian and Pacific Affairs 180,979 197,682 229,656 

European and Eurasian Affairs 395,740 402,537 435,685 

Near Eastern Affairs 788,911 410,076 436,676 

South and Central Asian Affairs 662,282 44,857 59,840 

Western Hemisphere Affairs 234,042 185,079 257,246 

23
 

 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 

FY 2011 

CR 

FY 2012 

Request 

International Organizations Affairs and International 

Conferences 70,144 71,717 97,547 

Public Diplomacy (including International 

Information Programs) 374,900 364,404 396,161 

Ambassador’s Fund for Cultural Preservation 5,750 5,750 5,750 

Travel, Medical, and Telecommunications 293,187 263,199 266,576 

Diplomatic Policy and Support 912,531 909,152 946,615 

Office of the Secretary 51,921 51,921 51,610 

Consular Affairs (excluding Border Security 

Program) 

325 325 318 

Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor 7,593 7,593 7,855 

Political-Military Affairs 10,503 10,503 10,555 

International Security and Nonproliferation 20,828 15,642 15,968 

Public Affairs 13,852 13,678 13,500 

Trafficking in Persons 2,897 2,897 2,899 

Legislative Affairs 2,895 2,895 2,936 

Chief of Protocol 3,719 3,719 3,737 

Office of the Under Secretary for Management 4,820 4,820 4,754 

Resource Management 89,560 89,860 88,955 

Administration (including GSA Rent) 426,795 423,540 449,213 

Information Resource Management 212,901 212,651 216,855 

Other Bureaus and Offices 63,922 69,108 77,460 

Security Programs 2,972,787 1,473,439 1,570,994 

Worldwide Security Protection 1,365,374 1,190,846 1,241,915 

Diplomatic Security 1,600,093 275,273 317,637 

Counterterrorism and Office of Foreign Missions 7,320 7,320 11,442 

- - -

Total, Diplomatic and Consular Programs 9,458,575 6,886,546 7,570,202 

Note: FY 2010 Actual includes $2,575,035,000 in OCO funding. 

24
 

 

 

 

 

 

Resource Detail – Highlights of Budget Changes for D&CP 

($ in thousands) 

D&CP 

Ongoing 

Operations 

Worldwide 

Security 

Protection 

D&CP 

Total 

FY 2011 Continuing Resolution 5,484,520 1,402,026 6,886,546 

Built-in Changes 

Base Adjustments 267,953 -12,216 255,737

 Technical Change 334,000 - 334,000

 Operational Level Adjustment -66,047 -13,416 -79,463

 Program Funding Regularization - 1,200 1,20 0 

Annualization of Requirements 81,362 - 81,362 

 Annualization of Prior Year Requirements 81,362 - 81,362 

Anticipated FY 2012 Wage and Price Requirements 96,898 32,522 129,420 

 Overseas Inflation 26,134 4,785 30,919 

Domestic Inflation 30,922 6,741 37,663 

GSA Rents 1,258 1,057 2,315 

Medical Inflation 576 - 576 

 Local Guard Program and Other Global Inflation 38,008 19,939 57,947 

Total, Built-in Changes 446,213 20,306 466,519 

Total, Current Services 5,930,733 1,422,332 7,353,065 

Program Changes 

 Human Resources 49,829 - 49,829 

 Overseas Programs 85,569 - 85,569 

 Diplomatic Policy and Support 42,762 - 42,762 

 Security Programs 7,579 31,398 38,977 

Total, Program Changes 185,739 31,398 217,137 

Total, FY 2012 Request 6,116,472 1,453,730 7,570,202 

25
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital Investment Fund 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

Capital Investment Fund 139,000 139,000 139,000 125,000 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117) and supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The FY 2012 request for the Capital Investment Fund (CIF) provides $125 million to continue 

making investments in Information Technology (IT). Such investments are essential to 

conduct the modern business of foreign affairs: all State Department programs depend on IT, 

from simple e-mail to specialized systems. 

IT investments in FY 2012 will improve the Department’s efficiency, customer service, and IT 

security. CIF funding will support modernized critical administrative and financial 

management systems, with increased access to information for personnel overseas and in 

Washington. Furtherm ore, CIF funding will facilitate consolidation of Department and 

USAID IT platforms in accordance with the QDDR, providing a flexible IT platform that is 

capable of supporting collaboration, information sharing, and common business applications. 

Combined with Expedited Passport Fees collected by the Department, CIF funding will provide 

a total of $264 million in the IT Central Fund for priority IT investments and modernization 

activities. 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 

FY 2011 

CR 

FY 2012 

Request 

Capital Investment Fund 139,000 139,000 125,000 

Expedited Passport Fees 161,500 127,000 139,000 

- - -

Total, IT Central Fund 300,500 266,000 264,000 

26
 

 

 

Border Security Program 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

Border Security Program N/A 1,582,662 1,989,552 2,084,982 

The FY 2012 budget provides $2.085 billion for the Border Security Program (BSP). The BSP 

helps protect and assist American citizens abroad and strengthens the security of U.S. borders 

by preventing the entry of terrorists or others intending to engage in criminal activity in the 

United States. 

The BSP is a fee-funded operation that relies on revenue from the collection of fees. These 

fees include: Machine Readable Visa Fees, Western Hemisphere Travel Surcharges, 

Enhanced Border Security Program Fees, Visa Fraud Prevention Fees, and other consular fees. 

The FY 2012 budget includes funding to cover the full costs associated with the provision of 

consular services, including overseas citizen services, consular facility costs, and investigative 

resources to support the Visa and Passport Security Strategy. 

Resource Detail - BSP Fees 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 

FY 2011 

CR 

FY 2012 

Request 

Machine Readable Visa Fees 926,135 1,005,639 1,076,662 

Western Hemisphere Travel Surcharges 294,258 315,000 365,750 

Enhanced Border Security Program Fees 319,404 628,913 598,570 

Passport Security Surcharges 280,742 573,813 525,000 

Immigrant Visa Security Surcharges 23,562 40,000 55,870 

Diversity Lottery Fees 15,100 15,100 17,700 

Visa Fraud Prevention Fees 42,865 40,000 44,000 

- - -

Total, Border Security Program 1,582,662 1,989,552 2,084,982 

27
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Embassy Security, Construction and Maintenance 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

Ongoing Operations 967,750 970,250 876,850 863,317 

Worldwide Security Upgrades 847,300 847,300 847,300 938,200 

Embassy Security, Construction and 

Maintenance 

1,815,050 1,817,550 1,724,150 1,801,517 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117) and supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The FY 2012 request for Embassy Security, Construction, and Maintenance (ESCM) totals 

$1.802 billion. The request reflects the State Department’s commitment to provide U.S. 

diplomatic and consular posts overseas with secure, safe, and functional facilities to assist them 

in achieving foreign policy goals. 

The ESCM request provides $938 million for Worldwide Security Upgrades (WSU). The 

funding will extend the multi-year Capital Security Construction program to replace facilities 

in the most vulnerable locations. When combined with Capital Security Cost Sharing (CSCS) 

contributions from other agencies and other reimbursements, the request will provide a total of 

$1.218 billion for new embassy compound (NEC) construction in Abuja, Nigeria; Beirut, 

Lebanon; Jakarta, Indonesia; N’Djamena, Chad; and Taipei, Taiwan; as well as site 

acquisitions for future projects. WSU funding of $95 million will also continue to upgrade 

security for compounds at high risk and soft targets, such as schools and recreation facilities. 

The Department intends to expand the CSCS program in FY 2012 to include the maintenance, 

repair, and rehabilitation of existing facilities. The Maintenance Cost Sharing (MCS) program 

will address facility needs at posts that will not receive a NEC in the near future. The $225 

million provided under the MCS initiative is necessary to extend the useful life of existing 

infrastructure and protect the U.S. long-term investment in new facilities. 

The ESCM request further provides $863 million for Ongoing Operations. The funding will 

support real property management, including administration of leaseholds, and other vital 

ongoing activities. These activities include repair and construction, program development and 

support, construction and security management, and maintenance and renovation of the 

Department’s facilities at locations in the United States. 

28
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Conflict Stabilization Operations 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

Conflict Stabilization Operations 120,000 80,000 120,000 92,200 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117) and supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The FY 2012 request provides $92 million for Conflict Stabilization Operations (formerly 

known as Civilian Stabilization Initiative). Funding for this appropriation will enable the 

Department to continue to build a civilian capability to prevent and respond to 21st century 

crises and conflicts. 

As noted in the QDDR, internal violent conflict, weak or failed governance, and humanitarian 

emergencies in numerous states around the world have become a central security challenge for 

the United States. Accordingly, the Department will embrace crisis and conflict prevention 

and resolution as a central national security objective and as a core Department mission. The 

Department will likewise address the promotion of sustainable, responsible, and effective 

security and governance in fragile states and reconstruction in the aftermath of conflict. 

An effective and deployable civilian capability requires resources for tools and training, 

deploying the right personnel, and changing ways of doing business both in Washington and in 

the field. Even in times of fiscal restraint, such a commitment of resources is wise: funding 

civilian capacity today may result in being able to head off much costlier military or 

humanitarian interventions down the road. 

The funding will build, train, equip, and deploy an interagency Civilian Response Corps 

(CRC), allowing its Active Component to grow to 200 members in FY 2012. CRC active 

members are assigned to the State Department and other participating agencies, including the 

United States Agency for International Development and the Departments of Justice, 

Agriculture, Commerce, Homeland Security, and Health and Human Services. These 

members stand ready and able to respond in countries in crisis, coordinating with U.S. or 

international military forces, delivering effective assistance, deploying teams to assist U.S. 

embassies, and partnering with local citizens and international organizations on the ground. 

The CRC also includes a Standby Component, whose members are employed at U.S. 

Government agencies and have volunteered to deploy when needed. 

The funding will support deployments of up to 80 or more members each month. It will also 

provide operations support and essential training for CRC members. Furthermore, the request 

will fund oversight, management, and operations of the CRC and headquarters policy and 

planning in the State Department. 

29
 

 

Resource Detail - CSO Activities 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 

FY 2011 

CR 

FY 2012 

Request 

Civilian Response Corps (CRC) Active 22,339 16,000 31,900 

Operations Support 8,427 13,020 7,700 

Training for CRC Active and Standby 8,614 5,220 9,600 

Deployments 12,344 34,660 15,500 

Equipment 1,050 25,000 1,000 

Civilian Deployment Center - - 600 

Headquarters Policy and Planning 27,226 26,100 25,900 

- - -

Total, Conflict Stabilization Operations 80,000 120,000 92,200 

30
 

 

 

 

 

 

Office of Inspector General 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

Office of Inspector General 59,600 59,600 56,000 65,154 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117) and supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The FY 2012 request for the Office of Inspector General (OIG) provides a total of $65 million 

to support the activities of the Department of State Inspector General. These activities include 

audits, investigations, and inspections of worldwide operations and programs of the 

Department and the Broadcasting Board of Governors. Such activities assist in improving the 

economy, efficiency, and effectiveness of operations, as well as in detecting and preventing 

fraud, waste, and mismanagement. 

The appropriation will also provide support for the OIG’s Middle East Regional Office and the 

Department’s full contribution to the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and 

Efficiency. 

For FY 2012, funding for the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction 

(SIGAR) and the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction (SIGIR) is being requested 

separately in Overseas Contingency Operations. 

31
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Educational and Cultural Exchange Programs 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

Educational and Cultural Exchange 

Programs 

635,000 635,000 635,000 637,100 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117) and supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The FY 2012 request for Educational and Cultural Exchange Programs (ECE) provides $637 

million for exchanges to promote mutual understanding between the people of the United 

States and other countries. Aligned with other public diplomacy efforts, these strategic 

programs build foundations of trust and prepare the next generation of leaders to work together 

on the shared challenges of the 21st century. 

The requested funding will strengthen America’s global engagement through exchange 

programs of proven value and create new opportunities to engage, educate, and empower 

foreign and American participants. The resources will be concentrated on high-priority 

countries such as Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq, Russia, and Indonesia. 

The request increases programs that support the President’s New Beginning initiative and that 

focus on relationships with Muslim communities worldwide. Targeted programs will support 

efforts in science and technology, human development, and entrepreneurship. Innovative 

programming will combine virtual and actual exchanges. 

Academic programs include the Fulbright Scholarship Program, the Hubert H. Humphrey 

Fellowships for mid-career professionals from developing nations, and the Benjamin A. 

Gilman program for American undergraduates with financial need to study abroad. They 

further include English language teaching, the English Access Microscholarship Program for 

underserved populations, educational advising, U.S. studies exchanges, and foreign language 

study. 

Professional and cultural exchanges include the International Visitor Leadership Program 

(IVLP) and Citizen Exchanges. The IVLP reaches key influencers in all geographic regions, 

bringing emerging leaders to the United States to meet with their American counterparts and 

gain firsthand knowledge of U.S. society, culture, and politics. Citizen Exchanges unite an 

extensive network of organizations and experts in professional, youth, cultural, and sports 

programs. 

32
Resource Detail - ECE Activities 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 

FY 2011 

CR 

FY 2012 

Request 

Academic Programs 358,627 357,348 358,998 

Fulbright Program (Students, Scholars, Teachers, 

Humphrey, Undergraduates) 253,826 253,504 252,704 

Global Academic Exchanges 59,471 62,844 68,634 

Educational Advising and Student Services 12,908 12,742 15,522 

English Language Programs 46,563 50,102 53,112 

Special Academic Programs 45,330 41,000 37,660 

Regional Graduate Fellowships 22,660 22,660 18,320 

American Overseas Research Centers 5,000 5,000 4,000 

South Pacific Exchanges 500 500 500 

Timor-Leste Exchanges 500 500 500 

Mobility (Disability) Exchange Clearinghouse 500 500 500 

Benjamin A. Gilman International Scholarship 

Program 

10,420 10,090 12,090 

George Mitchell Fellowship Program 500 500 500 

University of Miami Hemispheric Program 500 500 500 

Tibet Fund 750 750 750 

One-Time Special Grant Competition 4,000 - -

Professional and Cultural Exchanges 209,618 207,306 207,306 

International Visitor Leadership Program 95,025 95,869 95,869 

Citizen Exchange Program (Professional, Cultural, 

Youth) 102,000 102,844 102,844 

Special Professional and Cultural Exchanges 12,593 8,593 8,593 

One-Time Special Grant Competition 4,000 - -

Congress-Bundestag Youth Exchange Program 4,000 4,000 4,000 

Mike Mansfield Fellowship Program 1,902 1,902 1,902 

Institute for Representative Government 496 496 496 

Irish Institute 1,020 1,020 1,020 

Youth Science Leadership Institute of the 

Americas 

150 150 150 

Ngwang Choephel Fellows (Tibet) 650 650 650 

Pakistan Literacy Training 375 375 375 

Program and Performance 6,174 6,174 6,074 

Evaluation 1,939 1,939 1,939 

Alumni 4,135 4,135 4,135 

33
 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 

FY 2011 

CR 

FY 2012 

Request 

Social Networking 100 100 -

Exchanges Support 60,581 64,172 64,722 

- - -

Total, Educational and Cultural Exchange 

Programs 635,000 635,000 637,100 

34
 

 

 

 

 

 

Representation Allowances 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

Representation Allowances 8,175 8,536 8,175 8,175 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117) and supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The FY 2012 request of $8 million will reimburse diplomatic and consular personnel for 

official representation of the United States abroad and in international organizations. 

Protection of Foreign Missions and Officials 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

Protection of Foreign Missions and 

Officials 

28,000 28,000 28,000 27,744 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117) and supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The FY 2012 request of $28 million will help provide extraordinary protection of international 

organizations and foreign missions and officials in the United States. Of the total, $25 million 

will be used to reimburse the New York Police Department. 

35
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Emergencies in the Diplomatic and Consular Service 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

Emergencies in the Diplomatic and 

Consular Service 

10,000 29,423 10,000 10,000 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117) and supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The FY 2012 request of $10 million will help meet unforeseen emergencies and other 

requirements in the conduct of foreign affairs. This appropriation funds emergency 

evacuations of American citizens and U.S. Government officials due to civil unrest, natural 

disasters, or health concerns, including viral epidemics. The appropriation also pays rewards 

for information related to international terrorism, narcotics trafficking, and certain war crimes 

tribunals. 

Buying Power Maintenance Account 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

Buying Power Maintenance Account 8,500 30,500 8,500 -

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117) and supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The Buying Power Maintenance Account (BPMA) provides funding to offset adverse 

fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates that would erode the State Department’s buying 

power overseas. The FY 2012 budget does not include a funding request for this account, as 

the Department will use existing BPMA balances and transfer authorities to manage exchange 

rate fluctuations in FY 2012. 

36
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Repatriation Loans Program Account 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

Repatriation Loans Program Account 1,450 1,902 1,450 1,800 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117) and supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The FY 2012 request of $2 million will provide emergency loans to assist Americans abroad 

who have no other source of funds to return to the United States. These include travelers who 

are without money because of theft, illness, or accident, as well as Americans abroad who are 

caught in disasters or civil unrest. 

Payment to the American Institute in Taiwan 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

Payment to the American Institute in 

Taiwan 

21,174 23,158 21,174 23,320 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117) and supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The FY 2012 request of $23 million will fund the State Department’s payment to AIT to 

provide economic, commercial, and agricultural services, cultural and information programs, 

and travel documents and services for Americans and the people of Taiwan. 

37
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign Service Retirement and Disability Fund [Mandatory] 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

Foreign Service Retirement and Disability 

Fund [Mandatory] 

158,900 158,900 158,900 158,900 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117) and supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

This appropriation provides mandatory funding for the Foreign Service Retirement and 

Disability Fund (FSRDF). These resources help to finance any unfunded liability created by 

new or liberalized benefits, new groups of beneficiaries, and salary increases. 

The appropriation is one of several sources of income to the FSRDF, which is maintained also 

through contributions by employees, agency contributions, interest on investments, and 

voluntary contributions. 

The FY 2012 request for the FSRDF is $159 million. This amount includes estimated Foreign 

Service costs for the Department of $122.5 million and for the United States Agency for 

International Development of $36.4 million. 

38
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contributions to International Organizations 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

Contributions to International 

Organizations 

1,682,500 1,682,500 1,682,500 1,619,400 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117) and supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The FY 2012 request for Contributions to International Organizations (CIO) is $1.619 billion. 

The requested funds will pay assessed contributions for U.S. membership in the United Nations 

(UN) and over 40 other international organizations. For most of these organizations, the 

commitment to pay assessed contributions results from treaties and conventions that the United 

States has signed and ratified. 

For all but a few organizations included in the request, the United States contributes 25 percent 

or less of these organizations’ assessed budgets, with an assessment rate of 22 percent for the 

UN and most of the major specialized agencies in the UN system. 

Pursuing foreign policy objectives through international organizations enables the United 

States to leverage the financial contributions and expertise of other nations. By combining 

resources and offering opportunities for coordinated multilateral efforts, international 

organizations can be an effective alternative to acting unilaterally or bilaterally, especially in 

the areas of providing humanitarian assistance, eradicating disease, harmonizing standards for 

food and transportation safety, and reaching agreement to impose sanctions on rogue states and 

actors. 

International organizations offer significant benefits to U.S. taxpayers. Nearly all U.S. 

Federal agencies and countless U.S. businesses and citizens depend on international 

organizations to advance their objectives abroad. The U.S. public and private sectors depend 

on international organizations to reduce trade barriers, improve border and port security, 

provide international patent and trademark protection, maintain the world's 

telecommunications networks, set standards for aviation and maritime security, and 

disseminate information about the supply and demand of vital commodities such as cotton and 

coffee. The organizations also harmonize domestic laws in the areas of child custody, child 

support, international adoptions, and international child abductions. 

Furthermore, international organizations provide opportunities for advancing U.S. national 

security by facilitating collective action to combat violent extremism, limit the spread of 

nuclear and chemical weapons, achieve balanced and sustainable economic growth, and forge 

cooperative solutions to the threats of armed conflict, hunger, poverty, disease, and climate 

change. 

39
 

Resource Detail - CIO Activities 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 

FY 2011 

CR 

FY 2012 

Request 

United Nations and Affiliated Agencies 1,239,313 1,164,160 1,227,136 

United Nations Regular Budget (UN) 597,544 516,352 568,759 

United Nations Capital Master Plan (UN CMP) 75,535 75,535 75,535 

United Nations War Crimes Tribunal - Yugoslavia 

(UNICTY) 20,781 17,922 19,275 

United Nations War Crimes Tribunal - Rwanda 

(UNICTR) 17,057 13,839 14,867 

Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) 112,509 111,985 111,985 

International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) 98,906 102,972 106,838 

International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) 18,519 19,907 20,805 

International Labor Organization (ILO) 83,370 88,093 91,286 

International Maritime Organization (IMO) 1,333 1,414 1,483 

International Telecommunication Union (ITU) 9,361 10,617 10,617 

United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural 

Organization (UNESCO) 81,687 78,623 78,295 

Universal Postal Union (UPU) 2,066 2,348 2,336 

World Health Organization (WHO) 106,573 109,403 109,403 

World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) 1,097 1,208 1,216 

World Meteorological Organization (WMO) 12,975 13,942 14,436 

Inter-American Organizations 123,558 125,334 127,856 

Organization of American States (OAS) 47,064 48,148 49,604 

Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) 59,811 60,503 61,568 

Inter-American Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture 

(IICA) 16,359 16,359 16,360 

Pan American Institute of Geography and History 

(PAIGH) 

324 324 324 

Regional Organizations 176,430 167,186 171,781 

Organization for Economic Cooperation and 

Development (OECD) 90,716 82,783 83,484 

North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) 81,998 80,868 84,491 

NATO Parliamentary Assembly (NPA) 1,083 1,066 1,130 

The Pacific Community (SPC) 1,715 1,551 1,758 

Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) 901 901 901 

Colombo Plan Council for Technical Cooperation 

(CPCTC) 

17 17 17 

40
 

 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 

FY 2011 

CR 

FY 2012 

Request 

Other International Organizations 61,158 72,608 70,223 

Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons 

(OPCW) 24,075 25,253 25,146 

World Trade Organization WTO 24,403 25,286 27,120 

Customs Cooperation Council (CCC) 4,425 4,175 4,244 

Hague Conference on Private International Law 

(HCOPIL) 

297 322 330 

International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) 1,921 1,963 2,035 

International Bureau of the Publication of Customs 

Tariffs (IBPCT) 

168 161 -

International Bureau of the Permanent Court of 

Arbitration (IBPCA) 

73 72 74 

International Bureau of Weights and Measures (IBWM) 1,469 1,411 1,443 

International Center for the Study of Preservation and 

Restoration of Cultural Property (ICCROM) 1,055 1,047 1,046 

International Coffee Organization (ICO) 519 488 646 

International Copper Study Group (ICSG) 43 40 40 

International Cotton Advisory Committee (ICAC) 338 331 341 

International Grains Council (IGC) 533 515 534 

International Hydrographic Organization (IHO) 136 134 138 

International Institute for the Unification of Private Law 

(IIUPL) 

166 168 171 

International Lead and Zinc Study Group (ILZSG) 39 35 37 

International Organization of Legal Metrology (IOLM) 154 157 160 

International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) - 5,000 5,200 

International Rubber Study Group (IRSG) 105 112 -

International Seabed Authority (ISA) - 1,432 -

International Seed Testing Association (ISTA) 12 14 14 

International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) - 3,070 -

International Tropical Timber Organization (ITTO) 334 431 498 

International Union for the Conservation of Nature and 

Natural Resources (IUCN) 

446 514 525 

International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of 

Plants (UPOV) 

254 286 286 

World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) 193 191 195 

- - -

Tax Reimbursement Agreements for U.S. Citizens 20,280 22,306 22,404 

- - -

41
 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 

FY 2011 

CR 

FY 2012 

Request 

Total, CIO Annual Requirements 1,620,739 1,551,594 1,619,400 

Synchronization of Deferred Payments 61,761 - -

Adjustment for Exchange Rate and Other Changes - 130,906 -

- - -

Total, Contributions to International Organizations 1,682,500 1,682,500 1,619,400 

42
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contributions for International Peacekeeping Activities 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

Contributions for International 

Peacekeeping Activities 

2,125,000 2,221,500 2,125,000 1,920,000 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117) and supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The FY 2012 request of $1.920 billion for Contributions for International Peacekeeping 

Activities (CIPA) provides funding to pay the U.S. share of assessed expenses for UN 

peacekeeping missions. The funding will help support ongoing international peacekeeping 

operations worldwide, including critical UN missions in Darfur, the Democratic Republic of 

the Congo, Sudan, Haiti, Lebanon, and Liberia. 

The entire CIPA appropriation is requested with a two-year period of availability due to the 

demonstrated unpredictability of requirements from year to year and the nature of multi-year 

operations that have mandates overlapping U.S. fiscal years. The budget also requests 

authority to pay up to 27.2 percent of the cost of any UN peacekeeping operation for 

assessments received in calendar year 2011 and 2012. 

Acting through the UN allows the United States to share with other nations the risks and costs 

of dealing with international crises. UN peacekeeping missions further U.S. national security 

by ending conflicts, maintaining or restoring peace, and strengthening regional stability. They 

can also help lower the global tide of refugees, reduce the likelihood of unsanctioned 

interventions, and prevent small conflicts from growing into larger wars. 

Resource Detail - CIPA Activities 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 

FY 2011 

CR 

FY 2012 

Request 

UN Disengagement Observer Force (UNDOF) 13,278 13,770 12,990 

UN Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) 233,076 149,409 172,621 

UN Mission for the Referendum in Western Sahara 

(MINURSO) 21,310 16,459 16,440 

UN Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo 

(UNMIK) 20,427 13,788 13,480 

UN Peacekeeping Force in Cyprus (UNFICYP) 8,999 9,704 8,230 

UN Observer Mission in Georgia (UNOMIG) 594 - -

UN War Crimes Tribunal - Yugoslavia (UNICTY) 21,421 23,780 21,422 

43
 

 

 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 

FY 2011 

CR 

FY 2012 

Request 

UN War Crimes Tribunal - Rwanda (UNICTR) 16,550 18,342 16,550 

UN Integrated Mission in Timor-Leste (UNMIT) 68,488 59,423 56,340 

UN Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic 

of the Congo (MONUSCO) 387,730 586,317 408,000 

UN Mission in Liberia (UNMIL) 263,859 151,757 135,400 

UN Mission in Sudan (UNMIS) 361,135 289,195 298,663 

UN Operation in Cote d'Ivoire (UNOCI) 139,667 139,725 135,000 

UN Stabilization Mission in Haiti (MINUSTAH) 216,175 244,530 216,244 

UN-AU Hybrid Mission in Darfur (UNAMID) 763,391 536,567 512,329 

UN Mission in Chad and the Central African Republic 

(MINURCAT) 150,015 1,768 -

Peacekeeping Logistical Support in Somalia - 73,918 91,818 

Subtotal, CIPA Activities 2,686,115 2,328,452 2,115,527 

- - -

Total, Annual Requirements 2,686,115 2,328,452 2,115,527 

Additional Assessment - UNOCI - 25,000 30,000 

FY 2010 Haiti Supplemental 96,500 - -

FY 2009 Carry Over into FY 2010 63,255 - -

FY 2011/2012 Available Resources (Application of 

UN Credits/Carry Over) - -171,152 -225,527 

- - -

Total, Contributions for International Peacekeeping 

Activities 2,845,870 2,182,300 1,920,000 

44
 

 

 

 

 

International Boundary and Water Commission - Salaries and 

Expenses 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

International Boundary and Water 

Commission - Salaries and Expenses 

33,000 33,000 33,000 45,591 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117) and supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The International Boundary and Water Commission (IBWC) is a treaty-based organization 

comprised of U.S. and Mexican Sections. The sections exercise respective national rights and 

obligations under U.S.-Mexico boundary and water treaties and related agreements and develop 

binational solutions to boundary and water problems arising along the 1,952-mile border. 

The FY 2012 request for the IBWC provides $46 million in Salaries and Expenses for the U.S. 

Section. This appropriation funds the operations and maintenance of headquarters in El Paso, 

Texas, and eight field offices and three satellite offices along the border. The appropriation 

also supports administrative and engineering activities and field operations. 

The increase over the FY 2010 level is primarily to support operation and maintenance costs 

associated with the Nogales International Wastewater Treatment Plant and the new South Bay 

International Wastewater Treatment Plant facility to address secondary treatment of Tijuana 

sewage. 

45
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

International Boundary and Water Commission - Construction 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

International Boundary and Water 

Commission - Construction 

43,250 43,250 43,250 31,900 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117) and supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The FY 2012 request for the IBWC provides $32 million in Construction for construction and 

major renovations that enable the storage, distribution, and delivery of international waters in 

the Rio Grande and Colorado River. These activities afford protection of lives and property 

from floods in bordering communities. The appropriation also provides for the preservation of 

the international border and addresses binational sanitation issues through wastewater 

treatment and reduction of trash and debris. 

FY 2012 funding for Construction will continue multi-year efforts to improve Rio Grande 

levees and related flood control structures in the United States. The levees contain about 440 

miles of river and interior floodway channel along three unique Rio Grande flood control 

systems. The funding will also support rehabilitation of the dams for which the IBWC is 

responsible and renovation of IBWC facilities. 

46
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

American Sections 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

International Joint Commission 8,000 8,000 8,000 7,237 

International Boundary Commission 2,359 2,359 2,359 2,433 

Border Environment Cooperation 

Commission 

2,249 2,249 2,249 2,326 

American Sections 12,608 12,608 12,608 11,996 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117) and supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

International Joint Commission 

The FY 2012 request provides $7 million for the International Joint Commission (IJC). This 

funding will support the activities of a small U.S. Section staff in Washington, D.C., and a 

binational Great Lakes Regional Office in Windsor, Canada. 

The IJC was established by the 1909 Boundary Waters Treaty as a cornerstone of 

U.S.-Canadian relations in the boundary region. Under the treaty, the IJC licenses and 

regulates certain water resource projects along the border that affect levels and flows on the 

other side, provides advice to the governments and conducts studies on critical issues of mutual 

concern, and apportions waters in transboundary river systems. The IJC also assists the 

governments in efforts to prevent transboundary air pollution and improve air quality. 

The IJC’s model for preventing and resolving disputes is scientifically based, inclusive, and 

open to public input. Currently, 20 active boards and task forces, plus various related 

technical working groups and committees, provide expert advice on both science and policy 

issues. 

International Boundary Commission 

The FY 2012 request provides $2 million for the International Boundary Commission (IBC). 

This funding will support the primary mission of the IBC to maintain an effective (accurately 

delineated and marked) boundary between the United States and Canada as prescribed by the 

1925 Treaty of Washington. Maintaining such a boundary ensures the sovereignty of each 

nation over its territory by clearly establishing where one’s rights and responsibilities end, and 

the other’s begin, thus virtually eliminating the potential for serious and costly boundary 

disputes. 

The request will fund IBC operations and eight maintenance projects along the 5,525-mile 

boundary. The IBC maintains more than 5,500 land boundary monuments and more than 

2,800 reference monuments. The request will also provide for mapping and maintenance of a 

Geographical Information System. 

47
 

 

 

Border Environment Cooperation Commission 

The FY 2012 request provides $2 million for the Border Environment Cooperation 

Commission (BECC). The funding will continue the BECC’s work to improve health and 

environmental conditions for the U.S.-Mexico border region by strengthening cooperation 

among interested parties and supporting sustainable projects. 

A binational institution created in 1993, the BECC assists border communities in developing 

environmental infrastructure projects that meet certification requirements to be eligible to 

receive funding from the North American Development Bank or other institutions. These 

requirements help ensure that projects provide environmental and health benefits and are 

technically feasible and affordable. 

48
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

International Fisheries Commissions 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

International Fisheries Commissions 53,976 53,976 53,976 31,291 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117) and supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The FY 2012 request provides $31 million for International Fisheries Commissions (IFC) to 

fund the U.S. share of operating expenses for ten international fisheries commissions, the 

International Whaling Commission, two international marine science organizations, the 

Antarctic Treaty, and international sea turtle conservation initiatives. 

The request reflects a decrease from levels of the past two years, each of which included a 

payment of $15 million for U.S. obligations to Canada under the Pacific Salmon Treaty. The 

two payments will fully meet the U.S. commitment of $30 million. 

In most cases, U.S. contributions are mandated by treaties and agreements. Each commission 

facilitates international cooperation by conducting or coordinating scientific studies of fish 

stocks and other marine resources and establishing common management measures to be 

implemented by member governments. Many also oversee the allocation of fishing rights to 

their members. 

Full payment of assessments is required to maintain voting privileges and influence in the 

commissions and organizations to advance the economic and conservation interests of the 

United States and important constituent groups. 

Through the ongoing efforts of the commissions and programs funded by this appropriation, 

many fishing areas that were nearly depleted are now yielding sustainable catches for U.S. 

commercial and sport fishermen, and some key endangered populations are recovering. The 

commercial and recreational fisheries managed by the commissions generate income of $12 to 

$15 billion annually to the United States. 

Resource Detail - IFC Activities 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 

FY 2011 

CR 

FY 2012 

Request 

Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission 1,915 1,915 1,998 

Great Lakes Fishery Commission 28,200 28,200 18,700 

International Pacific Halibut Commission 3,250 3,250 4,500 

Pacific Salmon Commission 3,250 3,250 3,250 

Pacific Salmon Treaty Requirement 15,000 15,000 -

49
 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 

FY 2011 

CR 

FY 2012 

Request 

Other Marine Conservation Organizations 2,362 2,362 2,843 

Antarctic Treaty 41 41 67 

Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic 

Marine Living Resources 

109 109 117 

Expenses of the U.S. Commissioners 150 150 180 

International Commission for the Conservation of 

Atlantic Tunas 

301 301 325 

International Council for the Exploration of the Sea 225 225 268 

International Sea Turtle Conservation Programs 170 170 173 

Interantional Shark Conservation Program - - 100 

International Whaling Commission 182 182 200 

North Atlantic Salmon Conservation Organization 55 55 55 

North Pacific Anadromous Fish Commission 160 160 187 

North Pacific Marine Science Organization 169 169 212 

Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization 200 200 234 

Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission 600 600 725 

- - -

Total, International Fisheries Commissions 53,976 53,976 31,291 

50
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Asia Foundation 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

The Asia Foundation 19,000 19,000 19,000 14,906 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117) and supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The Asia Foundation is a private, non-profit organization that advances U.S. interests in the 

Asia-Pacific region. Incorporated and headquartered in California, the Foundation operates 

programs through 18 offices in Asia. The Foundation’s programs and grants support 

democratic initiatives, governance and economic reform, expansion of rule of law, women’s 

empowerment, and closer U.S.-Asian relations. 

Under the Asia Foundation Act of 1983, appropriated funds are the Foundation’s core funding 

source. The FY 2012 request of nearly $15 million will enable the Foundation to continue its 

work with Asian governments, nongovernmental organizations, and the private sector. 

Center for Middle Eastern-Western Dialogue 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

Center for Middle Eastern-Western 

Dialogue 

875 875 875 840 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117) and supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The Center for Middle Eastern-Western Dialogue was established by the Congress to further 

scholarship and implement programs to open channels of communication and deepen 

cross-cultural understanding. In FY 2012, the Center’s permanent trust fund will provide an 

estimated $840,000 in interest earnings for operations of the Center. 

51
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Eisenhower Exchange Fellowship Program 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

Eisenhower Exchange Fellowship 

Program 

500 500 500 500 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117) and supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The Eisenhower Exchange Fellowship Program builds international understanding by bringing 

rising leaders to the United States, and sending their American counterparts abroad, on custom 

designed professional programs. The program’s trust fund will provide an estimated $500,000 

in interest earnings in FY 2012 to support these exchanges. 

Israeli Arab Scholarship Program 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

Israeli Arab Scholarship Program 375 375 375 375 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117) and supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The Israeli Arab Scholarship Program fosters mutual understanding by enabling Arab citizens 

of Israel to study and conduct research in the United States. The program’s trust fund will 

provide an estimated $375,000 in interest earnings in FY 2012 to support such activities. 

52
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

East-West Center 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

East-West Center 23,000 23,000 23,000 10,830 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117) and supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The Center for Cultural and Technical Interchange between East and West was established by 

the Congress in 1960 to promote understanding and good relations between the United States 

and the nations of the Asia-Pacific region. Located in Hawaii, the East-West Center has 

engaged more than 55,000 participants in its programs since its inception. It can draw on 

extensive individual and institutional ties to work effectively on critical regional issues. 

The FY 2012 request of nearly $11 million will provide funding for the East-West Center’s 

programs of cooperative research, study, and exchange. Multinational and interactive, these 

programs advance U.S. interests by addressing such topics as collective security, good 

governance, trade and investment, disaster preparedness, and environmental change. 

53
 

 

 

 

 

National Endowment for Democracy 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

National Endowment for Democracy 118,000 118,000 118,000 104,000 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117) and supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The National Endowment for Democracy (NED) was established by the Congress in 1983 to 

strengthen democratic institutions around the world. Through a worldwide grants program, 

NED assists those working abroad to build democratic institutions and spread democratic 

values. 

NED’s four affiliated core institutes - the American Center for International Labor Solidarity, 

the Center for International Private Enterprise, the International Republican Institute, and the 

National Democratic Institute - represent public American institutions working in sectors 

critical to the development of democracy. NED also supports initiatives of nongovernmental 

organizations fostering independent media, human rights, and other essential democratic 

elements. 

Directed by a bipartisan board, NED makes approximately 1,200 grants per year in nearly 100 

countries. NED’s grants advance long-term U.S. interests and address immediate needs in 

strengthening democracy, human rights, and the rule of law. 

The FY 2012 request for NED of $104 million will enable NED to continue a strong grants 

program in priority countries such as China, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Egypt, Sudan, Somalia, 

Russia, and Ukraine, as well as countries in Central America. 

54
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

International Broadcasting Operations 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

International Broadcasting Operations 733,788 745,613 733,788 754,261 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117) and supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The FY 2012 request provides $754 million for International Broadcasting Operations. 

Through this appropriation, the Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG) funds operations of 

its broadcasting organizations, as well as related program delivery and support activities. 

The BBG is an independent Federal entity responsible for all U.S. non-military international 

broadcasting programs. BBG broadcasting organizations include the Voice of America 

(VOA), Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL), Radio Free Asia (RFA), Radio and TV 

Marti, and the Middle East Broadcasting Networks (MBN) - Radio Sawa and Alhurra 

Television. 

The BBG mission is to promote freedom and democracy and enhance understanding through 

multimedia communication of accurate, objective, and balanced news, information, and other 

programming about America and the world. BBG radio, television, and Internet programs 

reach more than 165 million people each week in 59 languages. 

The request will continue current programming operations into FY 2012 and fund the following 

initiatives: consolidating servers, launching a global news-sharing network, developing new 

media products, and continuing VOA’s digital media conversion. These increases are offset 

by reductions related to the restructuring of broadcasting to China, eliminating the VOA 

Croatian Service, and the optimizing the BBG’s transmission network. 

55
 

 

 

 

 

 

Broadcasting Capital Improvements 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

Broadcasting Capital Improvements 12,622 13,263 12,622 12,769 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117) and supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The FY 2012 request provides $13 million for Broadcasting Capital Improvements to maintain 

the worldwide transmission network of the Broadcasting Board of Governors, including the 

security requirements of facilities. The request includes funding for maintenance, repairs, and 

improvements to existing systems, as well as the following initiatives: Cohen Building 

essential maintenance study, BBG broadcast disaster recovery, digital media conversion, server 

conversion, and a BBG global satellite upgrade. 

56
 

 

 

 

 

United States Institute of Peace 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

United States Institute of Peace 49,220 49,220 49,220 42,740 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117) and supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The United States Institute of Peace (USIP) is an independent, nonpartisan institution 

established and funded by the Congress. Its goals are to help prevent and resolve violent 

international conflicts, promote post-conflict stability and development, and increase conflict 

management capacity, tools, and intellectual capital worldwide. 

The FY 2012 request for USIP provides $43 million for programs on peace building in zones of 

conflict, innovation in peace building, professionalizing the field of conflict resolution, public 

education, and operations and maintenance for the new USIP headquarters building. 

57
 

This Page Intentionally Left Blank. 

58
FOREIGN OPERATIONS REQUEST 

($000) 

FY 2010 Enacted1 FY 2010 Actual Total2 FY 2011 CR3 FY 2012 

Req

FOREIGN OPERATIONS 34,661,526 33,262,526 34,506,789 35,9

U.S Agency for International Development 1,653,700 1,623,700 1,650,300 1

 USAID Operating Expense (OE) 1,388,800 1,388,800 1,388,800 

 Conflict Stabilization Operations (CSO)

4 30,000 - 30,000 

 USAID Capital Investment Fund (CIF) 185,000 185,000 185,000 

 USAID Inspector General Operating Expenses 49,900 49,900 46,500 

Bilateral Economic Assistance 20,476,799 20,424,230 20,201,232 20

 Global Health and Child Survival (USAID and State) 7,829,000 7,782,600 7,779,000 

 Global Health and Child Survival - USAID

6 [2,470,000] [2,423,600] [2,420,000] [3

 Global Health and Child Survival - State [5,359,000] [5,359,000] [5,359,000] [5

 Development Assistance (DA) 2,520,000 2,520,000 2,520,000 

 International Disaster Assistance (IDA) 845,000 845,000 845,000 

 Transition Initiatives (TI) 55,000 55,000 55,000 

 Complex Crises Fund (CCF) 50,000 50,000 50,000 

 Development Credit Authority - Subsidy (DCA) [25,000] [25,000] [25,000] 

 Development Credit Authority - Administrative Expenses 8,600 8,600 8,600 

 Economic Support Fund (ESF)

8 6,569,567 6,563,398 6,344,000 

 Democracy Fund 120,000 120,000 120,000 

 Assistance for Europe, Eurasia and Central Asia (AEECA) 741,632 741,632 741,632 

 Migration and Refugee Assistance (MRA) 1,693,000 1,693,000 1,693,000 

 U.S. Emergency Refugee and Migration Assistance (ERMA) 45,000 45,000 45,000 

Independent Agencies 1,558,000 1,558,000 1,558,000 

 Peace Corps 400,000 400,000 400,000 

 Millennium Challenge Corporation 1,105,000 1,105,000 1,105,000 

 Inter-American Foundation 23,000 23,000 23,000 

 African Development Foundation 30,000 30,000 30,000 

Department of Treasury 85,000 85,000 85,000 

 Treasury Technical Assistance 25,000 25,000 25,000 

 Debt Restructuring 60,000 60,000 60,000 

59
FOREIGN OPERATIONS REQUEST 

($000) 

FY 2010 Enacted1 FY 2010 Actual Total2 FY 2011 CR3 FY 2012 

Req

International Security Assistance 8,511,500 7,198,669 8,650,500 8

 International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement (INCLE) 1,848,000 1,754,000 1,597,000 

 Nonproliferation, Antiterrorism, Demining and Related Programs (NADR) 754,000 754,000 754,000 

 Peacekeeping Operations (PKO) 331,500 331,500 331,500 

 International Military Education and Training (IMET) 108,000 108,000 108,000 

 Foreign Military Financing (FMF)

7 5,470,000 4,251,169 5,160,000 

 Pakistan Counterinsurgency Capability Fund (PCCF) - - 700,000 

Global Security Contingency Fund - - - 

 Special Defense Acqusition Fund - - - 

Multilateral Economic Assistance 2,437,670 2,434,070 2,437,670 3

 International Organizations and Programs

7 394,000 390,400 394,000 

International Financial Institutions (IFIs) 2,043,670 2,043,670 2,043,670 3

 Global Environment Facility (GEF) 86,500 86,500 86,500 

 International Clean Technology Fund 300,000 300,000 300,000 

 International Development Association 1,262,500 1,262,500 1,262,500 

 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development - - - 

 Inter-American Development Bank - - - 

 Enterprise for the Americas Multilateral Investment Fund 25,000 25,000 25,000 

Inter-American Investment Corporation 4,670 4,670 4,670 

 Asian Development Fund 105,000 105,000 105,000 

 African Development Bank - - - 

 African Development Fund 155,000 155,000 155,000 

 European Bank of Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) Trust Fund - - - 

European Bank of Reconstruction and Development - - - 

International Fund for Agricultural Development 30,000 30,000 30,000 

Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency - - - 

Asian Development Bank - - - 

 Global Agriculture and Food Security Program - - - 

 Strategic Climate Fund 75,000 75,000 75,000 

 Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative - - - 

60
FOREIGN OPERATIONS REQUEST 

($000) 

FY 2010 Enacted1 FY 2010 Actual Total2 FY 2011 CR3 FY 2012 

Req

Export & Investment Assistance (145,120) (145,120) (159,890) 

 Export-Import Bank 2,380 2,380 2,500 

 Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC) (202,700) (202,700) (217,590) 

 Trade and Development Agency 55,200 55,200 55,200 

Related International Affairs Accounts 83,977 83,977 83,977 

 International Trade Commission 81,860 81,860 81,860 

 Foreign Claims Settlement Commission 2,117 2,117 2,117 

Department of Agriculture 1,899,500 1,899,500 1,899,500 1,

Food for Peace Act Title II 1,690,000 1,690,000 1,690,000 

McGovern-Dole International Food for Education [Non-Add] 209,500 209,500 209,500 

Footnotes 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total includes the allocations as of March 30, 2010, from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117), forward funding froSupplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32) and supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). $1.8 billioforward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32) was designated for FY 2010 and is included in the FY 2010 Enacted level. Tforward funding includes D&CP Ongoing Operation: $361 million; D&CP WSP: $13.38 million; ESCM: $90.9 million; GHCS: $50 million; INCLE: $94 miFMF: $1,225.5 million. 2/ FY 2010 Actual Total includes the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117), supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), and excludes forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32). 3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 4/ Foreign Assistance levels have not yet been allocated at the program/country level under the annualized FY 2011 CR (P.L. 111-322). 5/ FY 2010 Actual reflects the Civilian Stabilization Operations rescission of $40.0 million for State and $30 million for USAID from unobligated balances prthe FAA Air Transportation Modernization and Safety Improvement Act (P.L. 111-226). 6/ The FY 2010 Actual level reflects the transfer of $3.6 million from International Organizations & Programs to Global Health and Child Survival-USAID. 7/ The FY 2010 Actual level reflects the transfer of $6.2 million from Economic Support Fund to Foreign Military Financing. 

61
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

USAID Operating Expenses 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

Adjusted USAID Operating Expenses 1,388,800 1,388,000 1,503,420 

Non-War Supplemental 10,000 10,000 -

USAID Operating Expenses 1,398,800 1,398,000 1,388,800 1,503,420 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117), supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), and includes forward funding 

from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The Quadrennial Diplomacy and Development Review calls for “elevating American ‘civilian 

power’ to better advance our national interests and be a better partner with the U.S. military.” 

The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) Operating Expenses (OE) request 

provides the resources to respond to this challenge. It includes funding for the ongoing 

Development Leadership Initiative (DLI) to strengthen the U.S. Direct Hire (USDH) overseas 

workforce to meet U.S. foreign policy objectives and support Presidential initiatives. It also 

includes funding for the USAID FORWARD agenda, which seeks to transform the Agency by 

reforming procurement systems and incorporating science, technology, and innovation in its 

development programs. 

For FY 2012, the $1,503.4 million USAID OE request will fund the administrative costs of 

managing USAID programs. The USAID OE budget covers salaries and benefits, overseas 

and Washington operations, and central support including human capital initiatives, security, 

and information technology (IT). In addition, USAID expects to have $88.1 million in other 

funding sources in FY 2012, including recoveries, reimbursements, and trust funds. 

FY 2012 funds will cover salaries, operational expenses, capital space expansion costs 

associated with the DLI, and the full operational costs for the frontline states of Afghanistan, 

Pakistan, and Iraq. 

Highlights: 

	 Development Leadership Initiative ($398.9 million): Funding will support the salaries 

and other operational expenses for the 95 mid-level Foreign Service Officers (FSOs) that 

will be hired in FY 2012 and the annualized, recurring costs of the FSOs hired in FYs 

2008-11. These costs include salaries and benefits, support costs, training, facilities, space, 

and IT reconfiguration. This amount also includes $40 million for continued overseas space 

expansion. 

	 USAID FORWARD ($21.7 million): Funding will support salaries for 70 Civil Service 

staff and other operational expenses necessary for procurement reform, and operational 

costs for investments in science, technology, and innovation. 

	 Overseas Operations ($657 million): Funding will cover USDH salaries and benefits for 

FSOs serving overseas and costs associated with maintaining mission operations - 

62
 

 

including those in the frontline states of Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq - such as salaries of 

local staff, travel, office and residential space, and security. 

 Washington Operations ($313.1 million): F unding will cover USDH salaries and 

benefits for Civil Service and Foreign Service employees working in Washington, general 

office support, and advisory and assistance services. 

 Central Support ($200.8 million): 

mandatory services. 

Funding will cover IT, office space, and other 

63
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

USAID Capital Investment Fund 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

USAID Capital Investment Fund 185,000 185,000 185,000 189,200 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117), supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), and includes forward funding 

from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The FY 2012 request for the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) Capital 

Investment Fund (CIF) of $189.2 million will support capital investments of both information 

technology and facility construction. The USAID Operating Expense account funds the 

annual operating and maintenance costs of information systems and facilities infrastructure. 

Highlights: 

	 Facility Construction ($142.5 million): Funding will support USAID’s full cost of 

participation in the Capital Security Cost Sharing Program. The Secure Embassy 

Construction and Counterterrorism Act of 1999 (P.L. 106-113) requires USAID to 

co-locate on new embassy compounds. The FY 2012 request will support the building of 

four new embassy compounds in countries with USAID presence: N'Djamena, Chad; 

Jakarta, Indonesia; Cotonou, Benin; and Abuja, Nigeria. 

	 Information Technology ($46.7 million): Fu nding will support investments in cloud 

computing and consolidating data centers to one centrally-managed location. It will also 

support modernizing antiquated software systems and enhancing USAID's worldwide 

business infrastructure by updrading the travel system, developing and hosting applications 

on the extranet for vendors and partners, enhancing security testing, and strengthening 

assessment and administrative capabilities. The request also will fund participation in 

on-going E-Government initiatives and improvements in USAID’s financial and 

acquisition and assistance reporting systems. These investments advance USAID’s 

reform efforts to improve operational efficiency. 

64
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

USAID Inspector General Operating Expenses 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

Adjusted USAID Inspector General 

Operating Expenses 

49,900 49,900 51,500 

Non-War Supplemental 4,500 4,500 -

USAID Inspector General Operating 

Expenses 

54,400 54,400 46,500 51,500 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117), supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), and includes forward funding 

from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The FY 2012 request of $51.5 million for the Office of Inspector General (OIG) for the U.S. 

Agency for International Development (USAID) will fund salaries and benefits for Washington 

and overseas staff, and operating expenses. The funding supports audit and investigative 

coverage of USAID, the African Development Foundation (ADF), and the Inter-American 

Foundation (IAF) programs and activities. This mandatory oversight responsibility involves 

auditing USAID, ADF, and IAF annual financial statements and information security 

management, and reviewing USAID’s implementation of the American Recovery and 

Reinvestment Act of 2009 (P.L. 111-5). 

In addition to oversight, OIG will focus its FY 2012 resources on USAID’s high-priority 

development programs in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and West Bank and Gaza. These 

programs include promoting economic growth, education, health, good governance, and 

democracy. This funding will also support OIG’s oversight of USAID’s programs to combat 

HIV/AIDS, malaria, tuberculosis, and the reconstruction efforts in Haiti. 

OIG assists USAID, ADF, and IAF in implementing their programs by providing information 

and recommendations to improve program and operational performance, and to detect and 

prevent waste, fraud, and abuse in agency programs. OIG also works with these three 

agencies to protect and maintain the integrity of their organizations and programs. 

65
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Global Health and Child Survival 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

Adjusted Global Health and Child 

Survival - USAID 

2,470,000 2,473,600 3,073,600 

Non-War Supplemental 45,000 45,000 -

Total Global Health and Child Survival - 

USAID 

2,515,000 2,518,600 2,420,000 3,073,600 

Global Health and Child Survival - State 5,359,000 5,359,000 5,359,000 5,641,900 

Total Global Health and Child Survival 7,874,000 7,877,600 7,779,000 8,715,500 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117), supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), and includes forward funding 

from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The Global Health and Child Survival account funds health-related foreign assistance managed 

by the Department of State and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). 

Investments in global health strengthen fragile or failing states, promote social and economic 

progress, and support the rise of capable partners who can help to solve regional and global 

problems. The U.S. Government’s efforts in global health are a signature of American 

leadership in the world. No nation has done more to improve the health of people around the 

world, including the United States' historic commitment to the treatment, care, and prevention 

of HIV/AIDS. The request is divided into two sections: USAID- administered and 

State-administered funding. 

The FY 2012 Budget reflects a comprehensive and integrated global health strategy to 

implement the Administration’s Global Health Initiative (GHI) by taking the investments made 

in the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), the President's Malaria 

Initiative (PMI), maternal and child health, family planning, tuberculosis, neglected tropical 

diseases, and other programs, and expanding their reach by tying individual health programs 

together in an integrated, coordinated system of care. This strategy will save millions of lives 

while fostering sustainable health care delivery systems that can address the full range of 

developing country health needs. Specifically, the Initiative’s overall emphases are improving 

health outcomes through a focus on women, girls, and gender equity; increasing impact through 

strategic coordination and integration; strengthening and leveraging key multilateral 

organizations and global health partnerships; encouraging country ownership and investing in 

country-led plans; building sustainability through investments in health systems strengthening; 

improving metrics, monitoring, and evaluation; and promoting research, development, and 

innovation. As these programs are implemented, USAID and the Department of State will 

continue to enhance the integration of quality interventions with the broader health and 

development programs of the U.S. Government, country partners, multilateral organizations, 

and other donors. For all programs described below, resources will be targeted toward 

countries with the highest need, demonstrable commitment to achieve sustainable health 

impacts, and the greatest potential to leverage U.S. Government programs and platforms as 

well as those of other partners and donors. Also, resources will be targeted to achieve 

ambitious outcomes on global health indicators. 

66
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The FY 2012 GHCS request includes a total of $200 million from several programmatic areas 

for the GHI Strategic Fund for Innovation, Integration and Evaluation to provide catalytic 

support to the learning agenda through accelerated work in designated GHI Plus countries. 

This represents the USG commitment to supporting GHI Plus countries in expanding, 

integrating and coordinating services from existing platforms, evaluating services and 

increasing use of innovative technology and practices as to improve efficient and effective 

service delivery. 

Global Health and Child Survival-USAID 

The Global Health and Child Survival request for USAID-administered programs 

(GHCS-USAID) of $3,073.6 million reflects the President’s commitment to a comprehensive 

approach for global health programs as outlined in the GHI. Expansion of basic health 

services and strengthening national health systems are key investments that significantly 

improve public health, especially that of women, newborns, children, and other vulnerable 

populations. USAID will continue to focus on scaling up proven interventions and approaches 

to assure effective, efficient, and sustainable health results. 

Highlights: 

$846 million for Maternal Health and Child Health (MCH) programs, focusing on 

working with country and global partners to increase the wide-spread availability and use of 

proven life-saving interventions and to strengthen the delivery platforms to ensure the 

long-term sustainability of these programs. Every year in developing countries 358,000 

mothers die from complications related to pregnancy or childbirth and 8.1 million children die, 

although two-thirds of the child deaths could be prevented. USAID will extend coverage of 

proven, high-impact interventions to the most vulnerable populations. Priority interventions 

include essential newborn care; immunization; polio eradication; oral rehydration; prevention 

and treatment of diarrhea, pneumonia, and infections in newborns; and point-of-use water 

treatment and other interventions to improve household-level water supply, sanitation, and 

hygiene. The maternal health program will scale up resources to combat maternal mortality 

with expanded preventive and life-saving interventions, such as prevention and management of 

post-partum hemorrhage, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and sepsis, and anemia, with 

simultaneous investment in building the longer-term human resource and system capability 

required to provide comprehensive obstetric care. The MCH program will also actively 

integrate across all health programs, particularly family planning, nutrition, and infectious 

diseases. 

$691 million for Malaria programs to continue the comprehensive strategy, launched in the 

PMI, which combines prevention and treatment approaches, and integrates these interventions 

with other priority health services. Annually, 800,000 people die of malaria and 250 million 

people are newly infected. USAID will continue to scale up malaria prevention and control 

activities and invest in strengthening delivery platforms with the goal of reducing the burden of 

malaria illnesses and deaths by half in up to 22 African countries, including Nigeria and the 

Democratic Republic of Congo. PMI will support host countries’ national malaria control 

programs and strengthen local capacity to expand the use of four highly effective malaria 

prevention and treatment measures. These measures include indoor residual spraying, 

long-lasting insecticide-treated bed nets, artemisinin-based combination therapies, and 

interventions to address malaria in pregnancy. The program will focus on reaching 85 percent 

of pregnant women and of children under 5 in the target countries. In addition, the PMI will 

continue to support the development of malaria vaccine candidates, new malaria drugs, and 

other malaria-related research with multilateral donors. 

67
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$625.6 million for Family Planning and Reproductive Health, focusing on programs that 

improve and expand access to high-quality voluntary family planning services and information, 

as well as other reproductive health care and priority health services. Annually, 52 million 

women experience unintended pregnancies and 22 million women obtain abortions. Family 

planning (FP) is an essential intervention for the health of mothers and children, contributing to 

reduced maternal mortality, healthier children (through breastfeeding), and reduced infant 

mortality (through better birth spacing). Activities will support the key elements of successful 

FP programs, including the creation of demand for modern family planning services through 

behavior change communication; commodity supply and logistics; service delivery; policy 

analysis and planning; biomedical, social science, and program research; knowledge 

management; and monitoring and evaluation. Priority areas include FP/MCH and FP/HIV 

integration, contraceptive security, community-based approaches for family planning and other 

health services, expanding access to long-acting and permanent prevention methods, especially 

implants; promoting healthy birth spacing; and cross-cutting issues of gender, youth, and 

equity. 

$350 million to fight the global HIV/AIDS epidemic by supporting USAID field programs, 

providing critical technical leadership, and conducting essential operational research. 

Funding will contribute to PEPFAR to focus on HIV/AIDS treatment, prevention, and care 

interventions worldwide - including support for orphans and vulnerable children affected by the 

epidemic, as well as continuation of the successful microbicide program including further 

development of 1% tenofovir gel, a candidate with very promising results last year. USAID 

collaborates closely with the Office of the U.S. Global AIDS Coordinator and other U.S. 

Government agencies to ensure that activities funded under this account complement and 

enhance efforts funded through the Department of State. 

$150 million for Nutrition. More than 200 million children under age five and one in three 

women in the developing world suffer from undernutrition. Nu trition activities will be linked 

with the Feed the Future Initiative and evidence-based interventions that focus on prevention of 

undernutrition through integrated services that provide nutrition education to improve maternal 

diets, nutrition during pregnancy, exclusive breastfeeding, and infant and young child feeding 

practices; diet quality and diversification through fortified or biofortified staple foods, 

specialized food products, and community gardens; and delivery of nutrition services including 

micronutrient supplementation and community management of acute malnutrition. 

$236 million for Tuberculosis (TB) programs, which address a disease that is a major cause 

of death and debilitating illness throughout much of the developing world. Globally, 1.7 

million people die from TB and there are 9.4 million new cases of TB each year. Annually, 

there are approximately 500,000 cases of multi-drug resistant (MDR) TB. Country-level 

expansion and strengthening of the Stop TB Strategy will continue to be the focal point of 

USAID’s TB program, including increasing and strengthening human resources to support 

Directly Observed Treatment, Short Course (DOTS) implementation, preventing and treating 

TB/HIV, and partnering with the private sector in DOTS. In particular, activities to address 

multi-drug-resistant and extensively drug resistant TB will be accelerated, including the 

expansion of diagnosis, treatment, and infection-control measures. USAID collaborates with 

the Office of the U.S. Global AIDS Coordinator and other U.S. Government agencies to 

integrate health services and strengthen delivery platforms to expand coverage of TB/HIV 

co-infection interventions including HIV testing of TB patients and effective referral, TB 

screening of HIV patients and implementation of intensified case finding for TB, TB infection 

control, and Isoniazid Preventive Therapy where appropriate. 

$100 million for Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs). Every year 1 billion people suffer 

from one or more tropical diseases, causing severe disability and hindering cognitive 

development. The NTD program will work with country partners to strengthen delivery 

platforms, particularly at the community level, and integrate NTD activities with other priority 

68
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

health interventions to deliver treatments for seven of the highly prevalent NTDs through 

targeted mass drug administration and training of community-based and professional health 

care workers. The vast majority of these drugs are centrally negotiated by USAID with the 

private sector, which donates hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of medication each year to 

reduce the burden of seven debilitating NTDs, including onchocerciasis (river blindness), 

trachoma, lymphatic filariasis, schistosomiasis, and three soil-transmitted helminthes. 

Building on this strong base of scaled-up integrated programs, this request also includes 

funding to initiate programs to target elimination of one or more of the diseases. 

$60 million for Pandemic Influenza and other Emerging Threats programs, which will 

focus on mitigating the possibility that a highly virulent virus such as H5N1 could develop into 

a pandemic while responding to the current H1N1 influenza pandemic by strengthening 

countries’ ability to detect cases and conduct appropriate control measures. In particular, 

activities will expand surveillance to address the role of wildlife in the emergence and spread of 

new pathogens, enhance field epidemiological training of national partners, strengthen 

laboratory capability to address infectious disease threats, broaden ongoing efforts to prevent 

H5N1 transmission, and strengthen national capacities to prepare for the emergence and spread 

of a pandemic. 

$15 million for Vulnerable Children programs for the Displaced Children and Orphans 

Fund (DCOF) and the Child Blindness programs. DCOF supports projects that strengthen 

national child protection systems, strengthen the economic capacity of vulnerable families to 

protect and provide for the needs of their children, and facilitate family reunification and social 

reintegration of children separated during armed conflict, including child soldiers, street 

children, and institutionalized children. USAID’s Child Blindness Program will provide 

eye-health education, comprehensive vision screening, refractive error correction, 

sight-restoring surgery, and education for blind children. 

Global Health and Child Survival-State 

The Global Health and Child Survival-State-administered (GHCS-State) account is the largest 

source of funding for PEPFAR, which is overseen and coordinated by the Department of 

State’s Office of the U.S. Global AIDS Coordinator. PEPFAR was launched in 2003 as the 

largest effort by any nation to combat a single disease. In its first phase, PEPFAR focused on 

establishing and scaling up HIV/AIDS prevention, care and treatment programs. In FY 2009, 

PEPFAR began to shift to an emphasis on achieving prevention, care, treatment goals while 

also strengthening health systems, including new health care worker goals, and emphasizing 

country ownership in order to build a long-term sustainable response to the epidemic. As part 

of the overall GHI, PEPFAR funding is used to support partner countries in expanding 

programmatic successes while increasing capacity of partner countries in managing, 

overseeing, and operating health systems. In support of this Initiative, PEPFAR is working to 

increase levels of collaboration and integration of donor resources and funding streams. It is 

also seeking to continue to build indigenous capacity, leadership and systems within which 

multiple health issues can be addressed, using HIV/AIDS investments as a foundation. 

PEPFAR supports countries to increase access to HIV/AIDS services through a 

comprehensive, multisectoral approach; to continue the transition from an emergency response 

to promoting sustainable programs that are country-owned and -driven; to address HIV/AIDS 

within a broader health and development context; and to increase efficiencies in programming. 

The FY 2012 GHCS-State request of $5,641.9 million includes funding for country-based 

HIV/AIDS activities, technical support/strategic information and evaluation, international 

partners, and oversight and management. PEPFAR implementation involves the Department 

of State, USAID, the Peace Corps, and the Departments of Health and Human Services, 

Defense, Commerce, and Labor, as well as local and international nongovernmental 

69
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

organizations, faith- and community-based organizations, private sector entities, and partner 

governments. 

Highlights: 

$4,168.3 million will support integrated HIV/AIDS prevention, care, and treatment, and 

other health-systems-strengthening programs in PEPFAR-supported countries. This 

request includes support for the ongoing implementation of the “Partnership Framework” 

model, with the goal of strengthening the commitment and capacity of partner governments in 

the fight against HIV/AIDS. These Frameworks outline expected partner contributions over 

the life of the arrangement and link U.S. Government, partner country, and other multilateral 

and bilateral resources to achieve long-term results in service delivery, policy reform, and 

financing for HIV/AIDS and related issues to foster an effective, harmonized, and sustainable 

HIV/AIDS response. Multiy ear U.S. Government resource plans under the Partnership 

Frameworks are noted as pending funding through the annual congressional appropriations 

process. 

PEPFAR programs for HIV/AIDS prevention, treatment, and care support the Administration’s 

overall emphasis on improving health outcomes, increasing program sustainability and 

integration, and strengthening health systems. Programs work by expanding partnerships with 

countries and building capacity for effective, innovative, and sustainable services; creating a 

supportive and enabling policy environment for combating HIV/AIDS; and implementing 

strong monitoring and evaluation systems to identify effective programs and best practices, 

determine progress toward goals, and ensure alignment with PEPFAR strategies. PEPFAR 

programs support scale-up of HIV/AIDS services within the context of strengthened health 

systems, particularly in terms of human resources for health in nations with severe health 

worker shortages, in order to effectively implement HIV/AIDS prevention, treatment, and care 

programs. In implementing these programs, PEPFAR will continue working to enhance the 

integration of quality interventions with the broader health and development programs of the 

U.S. Government, country partners, multilateral organizations, and other donors. Through 

activities like co-location of services and expanded training of health sector workers, PEPFAR 

is increasing access to overall care and support for infected and affected individuals. 

In addition, addressing gender issues is essential to reducing the vulnerability of women and 

men to HIV infection. PEPFAR proactively confronts the changing demographics of the 

HIV/AIDS epidemic by integrating gender throughout prevention, care, and treatment 

activities; supporting special initiatives, including those aimed at addressing gender-based 

violence; and adopting GHI principles that highlight the importance of women, girls, and 

gender equality. 

$1,045 million will support international partnerships, including a $1 billion contribution to 

the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria and a $45 million contribution to 

UNAIDS. (Separate from this request, the Department of Health and Human Services’ 

National Institutes of Health budget request includes a contribution of $300 million to the 

Global Fund, for a total FY 2012 contribution of $1.3 billion, consistent with the 

Administration’s pledge of $4 billion during FY 2011-FY 2013.) The Administration is 

actively engaged with the Global Fund in pursuit of reforms that will improve performance and 

eliminate corruption. More broadly, PEPFAR will continue to expand multilateral 

engagement with the goal of strengthening these institutions and leveraging their work to 

maximize the impact of country programs. 

70
 

 

 

 

$428.6 million will fund administrative costs, strategic information and evaluation 

expenses, and centrally managed support costs: 

	 oversight and management expenses incurred by U.S. Government agency 

headquarters including administrative and institutional costs; management of staff at 

headquarters and in the field; management and processing of cooperative agreements 

and contracts; and the administrative costs of the Office of the U.S. Global AIDS 

Coordinator. 

	 technical support, strategic information and evaluation expenses including central 

technical support and programmatic costs and strategic information systems that are 

used to monitor program performance, track progress, and evaluate the effectiveness 

of interventions. PEPFAR aims to support the expansion of the evidence base around 

HIV interventions, as well as broader health systems strengthening, in order to support 

sustainable, country-led programs. While PEPFAR is not a research organization, 

the program is working to expand its partnerships with implementers, researchers, and 

academic organizations to help inform public health and clinical practice. Technical 

leadership and direct technical assistance activities (including scientific quality 

assurance) are supported for a variety of program activities, including antiretroviral 

treatment, prevention (including sexual transmission, mother-to-child transmission, 

medical transmission, and testing and counseling), and care (including programs for 

orphans and vulnerable children and people living with or affected by HIV/AIDS), as 

well as crosscutting efforts such as human capacity development, training for health 

care workers, and supply-chain management. 

71
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Development Assistance 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

Development Assistance 2,520,000 2,520,000 2,520,000 2,918,002 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117), supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), and includes forward funding 

from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The FY 2012 request reflects a new, coordinated U.S. Government strategy designed to 

promote development objectives. The entire FY 2012 request for the Development Assistance 

(DA) account of $2,918 million is in support of this strategy. This new strategy stems from the 

Presidential Policy Directive on Global Development (PPD), a policy framework that elevates 

global development as a key pillar of American power alongside defense and diplomacy in 

order to create the conditions where assistance is no longer needed. The FY 2012 request 

includes $27 billion (comprised of DA and other appropriations accounts) to achieve the goals 

outlined in the PPD by supporting programs focused on sustainable development, economic 

growth, democratic governance, game-changing development innovations, and sustainable 

systems for meeting basic human needs. A key outcome of the PPD is the Partnerships for 

Growth (PfG), which calls for a coordinated U.S. government strategy of enhanced engagement 

with countries that have demonstrated a strong commitment democratic governance and 

sustainable development. In FY 2012, the Department of State and USAID will continue 

working with the initial PfG candidates-El Salvador, Ghana, the Philippines, and Tanzania-to 

promote broad-based economic growth through this account and others. 

U.S. national security depends on the nation's ability to deal with the urgent, the important, and 

the long-term all at the same time. DA is used to respond to longer-term challenges to human 

and economic security. These efforts - highlighted by fighting hunger, responding to climate 

change, and more - support the rise of capable new players who can help solve regional and 

global problems and help protect U.S. national security. 

DA-funded programs are coordinated with programs managed by the Millennium Challenge 

Corporation and other international affairs agencies. As a mutually reinforcing array of 

foreign assistance activities, these programs advance and sustain overall U.S. development 

goals in targeted countries. DA-funded programs support U.S. engagement with developing 

countries on critical global issues such as efforts to improve food security and to address the 

causes and impacts of climate change. Programs funded through this account represent the 

core United States contribution to international efforts working to achieve the Millennium 

Development Goals. 

Programs will support the efforts of host governments and their private sector and 

non-governmental partners to implement the systemic political and economic changes needed 

for sustainable development progress. Requests for significant increases in individual 

bilateral DA programs focus on countries that demonstrate commitment to improving 

transparent, accountable, and responsible governance, where U.S. assistance is most likely to 

produce significant and sustainable development results. 

72
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In FY 2012, the DA request will fund programs in the areas of food security, economic growth, 

education, governing justly and democratically, conflict mitigation and reconciliation, 

innovation, science and technology, and evaluation. The strategy for Feed the Future starts 

with the recognition that food security is not just about food, but it is all about security - 

national security, economic security, environmental security, and human security. These food 

security programs contribute to economic and social development by increasing rural incomes 

and reducing poverty and hunger. Other economic growth programs promote poverty 

reduction by opening markets, pursuing ambitious trade and investment agendas, assisting 

reform-minded governments to build the capacity to implement and sustain economic reforms 

effectively, mobilizing private sector participation, and strengthening recipient country 

accountability. Ed ucation programs focus on improving quality and access, building higher 

education capacity, and providing youth with basic academic and life skills that empower them 

to take full advantage of economic opportunity. 

Programs in the area of governing justly and democratically advance democracy, human rights, 

and governance. Programs vary based on the challenges present in each country, but include 

increasing political competition; strengthening civil society’s role in political, economic, and 

social life; supporting the free flow of information; promoting government that is effective and 

legitimate; strengthening the rule of law; and advancing anti-corruption measures. Conflict 

mitigation and reconciliation activities are designed to meet the unique needs of fragile or 

crisis-prone countries to establish a foundation for longer-term development by promoting 

reconciliation, supporting peace processes, and addressing the root causes of conflict and 

instability through peace building programs. 

Highlights: 

The Administration’s principal priorities for DA funding in FY 2012 include: 

	 Feed the Future (FTF) ($911.9 million): In many places, people whose sustenance is from 

agriculture cannot grow enough to feed their families, earn an income from selling their 

crops, or have no way of transporting it to local or regional markets. The broken systems 

contribute to hunger and poverty and can, in turn, lead to political instability. Since 2007, 

when global food prices skyrocketed, there have been riots over food in more than 60 

countries. U.S. assistance will support investments that address the root causes of hunger, 

improve food security, and permanently reduce the number of chronically hungry and 

malnourished by sustainably increasing agricultural productivity; linking farmers to 

markets in order to improve availability of food within countries and across regions; 

increasing incomes so the poor can purchase enough food; and reducing under-nutrition 

through targeted interventions that assist the most vulnerable. Assistance in the 

agriculture sector will focus on increasing incomes for producers, especially the rural poor 

and women, through expanded agricultural research and development, increased 

agricultural productivity, and improved post-harvest agricultural activities leading to rapid 

rural economic growth, expanded trade, and improved household nutrition. Funding will 

increase the effectiveness of emergency assistance by strengthening the capacity of 

countries to anticipate and prevent hunger-related emergencies over time. Assistance will 

be tailored to the needs of individual countries through country-led consultative processes 

and investment plans such as those developed under the Comprehensive African 

Agriculture Development Program, and coordinated with other donor efforts in accordance 

with the G-8’s L’Aquila commitments and principles. Investments will be concentrated in 

select countries where conditions are right to sustain progress. The initiative will deploy 

both bilateral and multilateral mechanisms to leverage additional resources and deliver 

them more effectively to recipient countries. This initiative, while funded predominantly 

out of the DA account, will also be funded through the Economic Support Fund and the 

Assistance for Europe, Eurasia and Central Asia accounts. 

73
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

	 Global Climate Change ($452 million): The effect of global climate change poses huge 

national security challenges, especially from the destabilizing impact it can have on 

economies and politics. Strategi c investments will help vulnerable populations adapt to 

the impacts of climate change by partnering with key developing countries to reduce net 

greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Adaptation programs will work with countries to better 

monitor the effects of climate change, as well as develop and implement effective strategies 

for reducing the impact on vulnerable populations and increasing those populations' 

resilience. Clean energy programs will partner with countries to support reforms and 

capacity-building with the aim of reducing GHG emission trajectories, particularly through 

investments in development and implementation of national-level low emissions 

development planning under the Enhancing Capacity for Low Emission Development 

Strategies (EC-LEDS) program, and through the promotion of policies and technologies for 

energy efficiency, renewable energy, and other clean energy priorities. Sustainable 

landscapes programs will reduce GHG emissions from forests and landscapes by helping 

countries analyze drivers of deforestation and develop plans to address them under the 

EC-LEDS program, build capacity to measure and monitor GHG emissions from forests, 

and build capacity and enhance rights for forest-dependent and indigenous communities to 

participate in and benefit from carbon finance opportunities. 

 	 Education: By opening markets overseas, promoting U.S. exports, and helping countries 

transition to developed economies, the Department of State and USAID foster economic 

prosperity at home. Education is foundational to human development. It is critical to 

promoting long-term, broad-based economic growth, reducing poverty and inequality, 

improving health, and promoting participatory democracy. USAID’s education strategy 

addresses learning across the education spectrum, which includes basic education, higher 

education, and workforce development. The predominant focus is on basic education -

specifically, reading acquisition in primary grades. Investments in workforce development 

and tertiary education that increase national capacity to support country development goals 

are also critical. Finally, increased equitable access to educational services for children 

and youth in conflict or crisis contexts will be prioritized. In addition to these 

programmatic priorities will be key policy reforms, especially as they advance 

accountability, transparency, and results measurement. Education investments will be 

driven by prioritizing contexts where interventions are realistically and measurably 

achievable in a three to five year timeframe, even with a longer strategic context. 

	 Economic Growth: The global financial crisis continues to hurt many developing and 

transition countries: weakening their financial systems, tightening credit, disrupting trade 

and investment, and decreasing economic opportunities, especially for the poor and 

disadvantaged. Development Assistance investments will help countries develop the 

policies and practices they need to support rapid, broad-based economic growth. 

Economic policies, regulations, and approaches also affect countries’ ability to meet other 

development objectives. A state that does not have growth-enhancing policies for raising 

and budgeting money cannot gather the resources to address its HIV/AIDS problem 

sustainably. Trade rules that block farmers from selling their goods across borders 

discourage farmers from growing the food required to support food security. Forests 

needed to address global climate change cannot be sustained if structures are not in place 

that provide local populations with the incentive to maintain them. U.S. economic growth 

investments will work in sectors and with firms to enhance their ability to work within 

these environments. Programs will work with countries to improve the enabling 

environment for private investment, entrepreneurship, and broad-based economic growth 

by addressing issues such as property rights, business registration, administrative “red 

tape,” well-regulated competition, trade policies and trade capacity, and access to credit. 

74
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

	 Governing Justly and Democratically: U.S. assistance will support democracy, human 

rights, and governance to consolidate democratic institutions, make government more 

effective and responsive to their populations, and expand the number of countries which 

respect human rights and act responsibly in the international system. This assistance is 

central to the success of overall development efforts in areas such as economic growth, 

global health, climate change, food security, and humanitarian assistance. Gov ernments 

that protect human rights and fundamental freedoms are ultimately more stable, successful, 

and secure than those that do not. Additionally, American workers are better off when 

their counterparts abroad can stand up for their basic rights. The focus of DA will be on 

new and fragile democracies, as well as on those that have committed through sound 

policies and practice to build effective, transparent, and accountable governments, 

particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, Asia, and Latin America to help ensure they are able to 

deliver both political and socioeconomic benefits to their citizens. Programming will 

pursue specific goals, including, increasing the ability of government officials, law 

professionals, nongovernmental organization affiliates, journalists, election observers, and 

citizens to strengthen the effectiveness, accountability, and participatory nature of 

democratic institutions within new and fragile democracies; strengthening domestic human 

rights organizations, supporting public advocacy campaigns on human rights, and training 

domestic election observers in order to foster respect for human rights, increase citizens’ 

political participation, and expand political competition in closed societies; and promoting 

stability, reform, and recovery to lay the foundations for democratic governance in conflict 

and failed states. 

	 USAID FORWARD Initiatives ($71.8 million): Funding will support initiatives on 

innovation, evaluation, and science and technology which will change the way USAID 

develops and brings innovations to scale, uses scientific advancements, and evaluates its 

work. The Development Innovation Ventures program borrows from the private 

venture-capital model to invest resources in innovative high-risk, high-return development 

projects, while the science and technology funding supports a series of Grand Challenges 

for Development to bring the power of science to bear on major development problems. 

Evaluation funds support a rebuilding of USAID’s capacity for performance monitoring 

and rigorous, relevant evaluation. 

75
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

International Disaster Assistance 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

Adjusted International Disaster Assistance 845,000 845,000 860,700 

Non-War Supplemental 460,000 460,000 -

International Disaster Assistance 1,305,000 1,305,000 845,000 860,700 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117), supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), and includes forward funding 

from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The FY 2012 International Disaster Assistance (IDA) request of $860.7 million will provide 

funds to save lives, reduce suffering, and mitigate and prepare for natural and complex 

emergencies overseas. These funds provide for the management of humanitarian assistance, 

rehabilitation, disaster risk reduction, and transition to development assistance programs. 

Natural disasters, civil strife, the global economic downturn, food insecurity, and prolonged 

displacement of populations will continue to hinder the advancement of development and 

stability. The IDA request will enable the U.S. Government to meet humanitarian needs 

quickly and support mitigation and preparedness programs to address threats to stability 

wherever and whenever they arise. The request includes $300 million for emergency food 

security, which may be used for local and regional purchase of food and other interventions, 

such as cash voucher and cash transfer programs to facilitate access to food. 

With IDA funds, the U.S. Government provides safe drinking water, basic health services, 

shelter, household commodities, seeds, tools, and livelihood assistance to millions of people in 

dozens of countries annually. Beneficiaries include disaster- and conflict-affected individuals 

and internally displaced persons. By reducing the impact of disasters, IDA-funded programs 

alleviate suffering, save lives. 

In addition, the U.S. Agency for International Development is responsible for certain necessary 

recurring and non-recurring costs for providing U.S. disaster assistance under the Compact of 

Free Association between the United States and the Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI) and 

the Federated States of Micronesia (FSM).1 Recurring costs are estimated at up to $2 million 

annually for IDA.2 These costs include pre-positioning of emergency relief supplies, full-time 

staff based in the region to coordinate with government officials in both FSM and RMI, and a 

cooperative agreement with the International Organization for Migration (IOM). 

 Under the statutory framework of P.L. 108-188, as amended, and P.L. 110-229, the Federal emergency Management Agency is 

unable to provide funding for USAID unless threshold damage for a Presidential Disaster Declaration occurs and a Declaration is 

made. USAID is responsible for costs incurred in anticipation of and/or in response to an event that does not result in a 

Declaration, as well as for necessary recurring costs not attributable to a Declaration. 

 The USAID request includes additional recurring costs in Development Assistance for the Asia Bureau (see country entries for 

RMI and FSM). 

76
 

 

 

 

 

Transition Initiatives 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

Transition Initiatives 55,000 55,000 55,000 56,000 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117), supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), and includes forward funding 

from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The FY 2012 request of $56 million for the Transition Initiatives (TI) account will address 

opportunities and challenges facing conflict-prone countries and those countries making the 

transition from the initial crisis stage of a complex emergency to sustainable development and 

democracy. 

TI funds will support fast, flexible, short-term assistance to advance peace and democracy in 

countries that are important to U.S. foreign policy, including promoting responsiveness of 

central governments to local needs, civic participation programs, media programs raising 

awareness of national issues, addressing underlying causes of instability, and conflict 

resolution measures. 

77
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Complex Crises Fund 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

Complex Crises Fund 50,000 50,000 50,000 75,000 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117), supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), and includes forward funding 

from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

In FY 2010, funding for the Complex Crises Fund (CCF) was first provided by Congress in an 

effort to regularize funding previously received through transfers from the Department of 

Defense under Section 1207 authority. Managed by USAID, these funds support activities to 

prevent or respond to emerging or unforeseen crises that address security or stabilization needs. 

The FY 2012 request of $75 million will target countries or regions that demonstrate a high or 

escalating risk of conflict, instability, or an unanticipated opportunity for progress in a 

newly-emerging or fragile democracy. Projects will aim to address and prevent root causes of 

conflict and instability through a whole-of-government approach and will include host 

government participation, as well as other partner resources, where possible and appropriate. 

78
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Development Credit Authority 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 4/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

Development Credit Authority - Subsidy [25,000] [25,000] [25,000] [50,000] 

Development Credit Authority - 

Administrative Expenses 

8,600 8,600 8,600 8,300 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117), supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), and includes forward funding 

from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

4/ The Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212) provided that Economic Support Funds enacted therein for Haiti 

earthquake relief could be transferred to, and merged with, funds available under the DCA heading. Any such transfers are in 

addition to the transfers authorized under the FY 2010 DCA heading. 

The FY 2012 request includes $50 million in Development Credit Authority (DCA) transfer 

authority to provide loan guarantees in all regions and sectors targeted by the U.S. Agency for 

International Development (USAID), and $8.3 million for DCA administrative expenses. 

DCA transfer authority allows field missions to transfer funds from USAID appropriation 

accounts to the DCA program account to finance the subsidy cost of DCA partial credit 

guarantees. These projects allow credit to be used as a flexible tool for a wide range of 

development purposes, and can help to promote broad-based economic growth in developing 

and transitional economies. DCA guarantees augment grant assistance by mobilizing private 

capital for sustainable development projects. In coordination with related technical assistance, 

it supports host countries in the financing of their own development. 

The ability of DCA projects to leverage assistance resources is significant. To date, DCA has 

been used to mobilize in excess of $2.3 billion in local private financing at a budget cost of $82 

million. DCA transfer authority has enabled more than 64 USAID missions to enter into over 

300 guarantee agreements in virtually every development sector. DCA projects have proven 

very effective in channeling resources to microenterprises, small- and medium-scale 

businesses, farmers, healthcare providers, and certain infrastructure sectors, most notably clean 

energy. Despite the ongoing global financial crisis, DCA mobilized more private capital in 

2010 than any previous year. The accelerated progress of the DCA portfolio can be attributed 

in part to its increasing number of strategic partnerships. In the last year, partnerships with the 

Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, the African Development Bank, and 

Standard Chartered have resulted in innovative projects and an expanded reach for DCA. 

In FY 2012, DCA will continue to promote the flow of credit to microfinance institutions, small 

and medium enterprises, agriculture, energy-efficiency projects, and municipalities. In 

addition, USAID intends to scale guarantees, particularly for key Administration priorities such 

as food security, water, and health. For example, DCA will work with the Japan International 

Cooperation Agency to support a large water fund in Africa. DCA will also establish a 

regional guarantee to support infrastructure, such as irrigation for agriculture in Africa. 

In accordance with the Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990 (2 U.S.C. sec. 661), the request for 

credit administrative expenses will fund the total cost of development, implementation, and 

financial management of the DCA program, as well as the continued administration of 

USAID’s legacy credit portfolios, which amount to more than $18 billion. 

79
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Economic Support Fund 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

Adjusted Economic Support Fund 6,569,567 6,563,398 5,968,663 

Non-War Supplemental 912,000 912,000 -

Economic Support Fund 7,481,567 7,475,398 6,344,000 5,968,663 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117), supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), and includes forward funding 

from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The FY 2012 Economic Support Fund (ESF) request of $5,968.7 million advances U.S. 

interests by helping countries meet short- and long-term political, economic, and security 

needs. These needs are addressed through a range of activities, from countering terrorism and 

extremist ideology to increasing the role of the private sector in the economy; assisting in the 

development of effective, accessible, independent legal systems; supporting transparent and 

accountable governance; and the empowerment of citizens. Programs funded through this 

account are critical to U.S. national security by preventing wars and containing conflicts, and 

foster economic prosperity at home by opening markets overseas, promoting U.S. exports, and 

helping countries transition to developed economies. 

Highlights: 

Sub-Saharan Africa ($618.5 million): The FY 2012 request includes funding for programs 

that strengthen effective democratic institutions and support conflict mitigation and 

reconciliation, basic education, and economic growth in key African countries. The focus 

countries in Africa include: 

	 Sudan ($335.7 million): The FY 2012 request will support implementation of the 

outcome of the January 2011 referendum on self-determination for Southern Sudanese 

unity or southern independence, ongoing stabilization and conflict mitigation programs 

along the North-South border, and peace processes in Darfur. In Southern Sudan, 

funds will mainly support conflict prevention, mitigation and reconciliation, consensus 

building between leaders and constituencies, good governance, anti-corruption efforts, 

basic education, and improved service delivery. In Darfur and the Three Areas, 

efforts will focus on stabilization and conflict mitigation with the potential to pilot 

early recovery in Darfur, if conditions on the ground allow. Funding for these 

programs will help to maintain stability and prevent conflict. 

	 Liberia ($124.3 million): The FY 2012 request focuses on reforming the security 

and justice sectors, improving governance, expanding basic and higher education, 

increasing food security, developing the private sector, and rehabilitating market roads 

and infrastructure. 

	 Democratic Republic of the Congo ($59.9 million): The FY 2012 request will 

support conflict mitigation, the prevention and treatment of sexual and gender-based 

violence, basic education, agriculture, governance reforms, legislature capacity 

80
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

building, and rule of law and civil protection programs to support a democratic Congo 

that provides for the basic needs of its citizens. 

	 Zimbabwe ($39.1 million): The FY 2012 request will support strengthening the rule 

of law and human rights, improving governance, increasing political competition and 

consensus building, strengthening civil society, improving food security, and 

supporting the private sector and economic recovery. Support for Zimbabwe, 

particularly with regard to macro-economic technical assistance, assumes that there 

will continue to be progress in reforming the political system under a reform-minded 

transitional government or a new government that comes to power through free, fair, 

and transparent elections that represent the will of the Zimbabwean people. 

East Asia and the Pacific ($57.7 million): The FY 2012 request includes funding to 

strengthen democracy and economic development in the region. 

	 Burma ($35.1 million): The FY 2012 request will focus on strengthening civil 

society, fostering ethnic reconciliation and democratic culture and practices, 

strengthening alternatives to the educational system, providing crisis assistance and 

recovery programs to Burmese refugees and internally displaced persons along the 

border, and continuing post-disaster recovery efforts in the Delta and other neglected 

areas of the country. 

	 East Asia and Pacific Regional ($12.6 million): The FY 2012 request will support 

partnerships with key regional multilateral organizations such as the Asia-Pacific 

Economic Cooperation (APEC) Forum, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations 

(ASEAN), and the ASEAN Regional Forum. Additionally, the funds will support the 

Secretary of State’s Lower Mekong Initiative (LMI). These programs will help 

maintain momentum for key economic priorities pursued within APEC during the 

United States' host year in 2011 and will fulfill the President's commitments to the 

United States-ASEAN Enhanced Partnership. 

Europe and Eurasia ($6 million): The FY 2012 request for Europe and Eurasia supports 

peace and reconciliation programs in Cyprus and Northern Ireland. In Cyprus, funds will 

support programs focused on encouraging the eventual reunification of the island by building 

support for the peace process, increasing the capacity of civil society to advocate for 

reconciliation and reunification, and furthering economic integration. In Northern Ireland, 

resources will support the U.S. contribution to the International Fund for Ireland, which focuses 

on improving economic conditions and fostering peace and reconciliation in marginalized and 

divided communities in Belfast and other areas of Northern Ireland, and the border counties of 

the Republic of Ireland. 

Near East ($1,593.2 million): The FY 2012 request includes funding to support democratic 

reform and political institution building in the Middle East and to help create economic 

opportunities for youth in the region. Fundinig will continue for programs that advance U.S. 

national security interests. 

	 Jordan ($360 million): The FY 2012 request will advance political reforms; build 

technical capacity of the local and national governments; support improvements in 

basic education, health, energy, youth and poverty, and water, and sanitation services 

in Jordanian communities; and provide assistance to address the needs of youth and 

reduce poverty. 

	 Egypt ($250 million): The FY 2012 request is intended to support political and 

economic reform in Egypt, as well as broader development objectives. Given the 

81
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

changing political situation, programs will aim to support increased public 

participation, while promoting human rights, civil society capacity building, and a 

transition to a market-oriented, private sector-led economy. Funds will continue to 

address the needs of ordinary Egyptians, including improving coverage of primary 

health care among underserved populations, and building sustainable systems to 

expand and enhance education. 

	 Iraq ($325.7 million): The FY 2012 request will continue to support the President’s 

goal of a sovereign, stable, and self-reliant Iraq as the U.S. Government completes the 

transition from a military to civilian partnership. This request will support 

capacity-building efforts in the central and provincial governments, fund 

anti-corruption programs, and promote broad-based economic growth and 

diversification, especially by developing Iraq’s agriculture sector and strengthening 

Iraq’s private sector economy. 

	 West Bank and Gaza ($400.4 million): The FY 2012 request will strengthen the 

Palestinian Authority (PA) as a credible partner in Middle East peace and security 

efforts, and continue to respond to humanitarian needs in Gaza. Assistance will 

provide significant resources to support PA reform efforts; support economic, 

democratic and social development of the West Bank and Gaz; increase the capacity of 

the PA to meet the needs of its people; and help build the institutions necessary for a 

future Palestinian state that can live side-by-side with Israel in peace and security. 

Funding will be used to ensure progress is made towards peace, create a more stable 

Middle East and support U.S. national security. 

	 Lebanon ($100 million): The FY 2012 request supports Lebanon’s viability as an 

independent and sovereign democracy capable of responding to the needs of its 

citizens. These goals support a peaceful Middle East and a direct enhancement of 

U.S. national security. The request includes significant direct project assistance that 

will improve the quality of life for ordinary Lebanese and promote economic 

prosperity across sectarian lines. The United States is closely watching recent 

developments in Lebanon. The next government should be judged by its actions and 

decisions. Until there is a new Lebanese government, it is premature to make any 

determinations about the future of U.S. assistance to Lebanon. However, it is 

important that we continue to plan for ongoing assistance through FY 2012 as an 

incentive for the next government and to consolidate gains. The program's emphasis 

will continue to be placed on funding non-governmental organizations. 

South and Central Asia ($2,980.1 million): The FY 2012 request includes funding for 

economic reconstruction and development, democracy and governance efforts, and 

stabilization initiatives. 

	 Afghanistan ($1,587.6 million): The FY 2012 request will support the 

civilian-military campaign strategy to counter threats posed by extremists, build the 

capacity of the Afghan Government to deliver services to its people and promote 

economic opportunities. These resources will continue to lay the groundwork for 

transition of districts and provinces from international to Government of Afghanistan 

control of governance, security, and service delivery. Ad ditionally, these funds will 

continue critical assistance in areas such as health, education, agriculture, 

strengthening the rule of law, and improving governance. 

	 Pakistan ($1,359.6 million): The FY 2012 request will support the implementation 

of the U.S. Civilian Assistance Strategy for Pakistan. Assistance will include 

short-term stabilization programs that provide immediate assistance to conflict-prone 

82
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

areas, as well as medium- to long-term development assistance programs that will 

further the foundation for a stable economy and a strong, moderate, competent, 

democratic government that exercises authority across all of its territory and is 

responsive to its people. Funding will focus on programs to increase stabilization, 

improve energy and water infrastructure, increase economic growth including 

agriculture, and improve delivery of social services. It will also complement current 

efforts to help Pakistan rebuild from the 2010 floods. 

Western Hemisphere ($477.6 million): The FY 2012 ESF request will enhance citizen safety, 

foster social and economic opportunity, and strengthen effective and democratic institutions. 

Foreign assistance to Mexico and Central America secures U.S. borders by funding counterdrug and 

anti-crime initiatives. The investments in the western hemisphere are critical to repelling the reach 

of criminal organizations and gang violence throughout the region. Targeted amounts of funding 

will be directed toward economic development needs that help support regional security. Effective 

programs, such as education and skills training for at-risk youth, reduce the attractiveness of criminal 

activity. Trade-capacity building programs promote free trade, international investment, and 

economic partnerships with the region. 

	 Haiti ($146.3 million): Funding in the FY 2012 request will support long-term 

development in key sectors, such as infrastructure and energy, food and economic 

security, health and other basic services, and governance and the rule of law. Funds 

will catalyze economic growth by investing in agriculture and energy development, 

and will ensure long-term stability by building capacity and effectiveness of public 

institutions, particularly those responsible for health, justice, and security. 

	 Mexico ($33.3 million): The FY 2012 request will support the Administration’s 

“Beyond Merida” four-pillar approach to broaden and deepen cooperation with 

Mexico in order to strengthen institutions and communities against the deleterious 

effects of drugs and organized crime, particularly at the regional and local level. 

Specifically, ESF programs will foster greater respect for the rule of law and human 

rights by building strong and resilient communities in targeted geographic areas that 

are most at risk. A more stable Mexico will increase United States' national security 

and economic growth potential. 

	 Western Hemisphere Regional ($79 million): The FY 2012 request will support 

critical and multi-account efforts under the Central America Regional Security 

Initiative (CARSI) ($45 million) and the Caribbean Basin Security Initiative (CBSI) 

($17 million) to build the capacity of these regions to combat rising threats from drug 

trafficking and organized crime, strengthen law enforcement and rule of law 

institutions, and combat the root causes of poverty and inequality. CARSI seeks to 

counter Central America’s rapidly deteriorating security situation through a sequenced 

approach; ESF funding will strengthen justice sector institutions as well as address the 

underlying economic and social conditions that place communities at risk. In the 

Caribbean, CBSI mitigates the “balloon effect” of drugs and crime patterns shifting to 

the Caribbean as a result of improved security situations elsewhere in the Western 

Hemisphere. These funds will promote social justice through programs designed to 

promote justice sector reform, combat government corruption, and assist vulnerable 

populations at risk of recruitment into criminal organizations. Violence from Central 

America and the Caribbean directly impacts United States national security, and these 

funds will be used to help stem the violence and reverse the trends. 

	 Colombia ($189.1 million): The FY 2012 request will continue to help consolidate 

the gains made to date by the Government of Colombia in its fight against illegal armed 

groups and narcotics trafficking by strengthening its institutional capacity to provide 

83
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

security, economic, and social development. ESF-supported programs will build on 

the security gains achieved and support alternative development, enhance the 

capabilities of justice personnel, strengthen the criminal justice system, support 

internally displaced persons and vulnerable populations, and expand economic 

opportunity - all in carefully identified strategic geographic zones in which violence, 

illicit crop cultivation, and drug trafficking converge. 

	 Venezuela ($5 million): These funds will help strengthen and support a Venezuelan 

civil society that will protect democratic space and seek to serve the interests and needs 

of the Venezuelan people. Funding will enhance citizens’ access to objective 

information, facilitate peaceful debate on key issues, provide support to democratic 

institutions and processes, promote citizen participation, and encourage democratic 

leadership. 

	 Cuba ($20 million): These funds will support humanitarian assistance for prisoners 

of conscience and their families, strengthen Cuban civil society and encourage civic 

participation, and promote fundamental freedoms and basic human rights, including 

free expression. 

Global Programs ($235.5 million): The FY 2012 ESF request funds programs that are 

implemented worldwide. 

	 Human Rights and Democracy Fund ($66.5 million): Through the implementation 

of innovative programs and use of new technologies, the FY 2012 request will address 

human rights abuses globally, wherever fundamental rights are threatened; open 

political space in struggling or nascent democracies and authoritarian regimes; support 

civil society activists worldwide; and protect populations that are at risk, including 

women, indigenous populations, and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender peoples. 

Governments that protect human rights and fundamental freedoms are ultimately more 

stable, successful, and secure than those that do not. The United States finds more 

willing, reliable, and lasting partners in those governments that reflect and act in the 

broad interests of their own people, rather than the narrow interests of the few. 

Additionally, American workers are better off when their counterparts abroad can 

stand up for their basic rights. 

	 Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs (OES) ($125.1 

million): As part of the Global Climate Change (GCC) Initiative, funds will support 

key strategic bilateral diplomatic partnerships as well as multilateral efforts to include 

the Least Developed Countries Fund, Special Climate Change Fund, Major Economies 

Initiatives and Partnerships, Methane-to-Markets Partnership, World Bank Forest 

Carbon Partnership Facility, and the World Bank Market Readiness Facility. Outside 

of GCC, OES Partnerships will be used to promote cooperation and build global 

capacity for sound stewardship of environmental and natural resources in concert with 

global economic growth and social development. This funding will aid efforts to help 

developing countries deal with the impact of climate change, which is threatening to 

exacerbate problems significantly in providing basic human needs and economic 

livelihoods. 

	 Economic Growth, Agriculture and Trade ($39.9 million): The requested funds 

will promote fiscal transparency through projects in countries that have demonstrated a 

commitment to reform; expand economic opportunity by supporting entrepreneurship 

and providing entrepreneurs with necessary skills to expand enterprises; help to 

improve accountability, transparency, and development outcomes in emerging oil and 

gas producing nations; and support U.S. export promotion efforts by focusing where 

84
 

 

 

 

improvements can have a catalytic impact on a developing nation’s ability to conduct 

cross-border trade. Economic growth is key to U.S. national security and the 

foundation of America’s strength. The Department of State and the U.S. Agency for 

International Development build economic prosperity at home by opening markets 

overseas, promoting U.S. exports, and helping countries transition from developing to 

developed economies. 

85
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assistance for Europe, Eurasia and Central Asia 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

Assistance for Europe, Eurasia and Central 

Asia 

741,632 741,632 741,632 626,718 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117), supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), and includes forward funding 

from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The FY 2012 budget request for Assistance for Europe, Eurasia and Central Asia (AEECA) of 

$626.7 million supports United States efforts to stabilize and transition Southeastern Europe 

and the independent states of the former Soviet Union to become stable, pluralistic, and 

prosperous countries. In the context of a tightly constrained budget environment overall, the 

significant decrease in resources requested for AEECA in FY 2012 reflects progress by a 

number of countries toward Euro-Atlantic integration and the need to support other foreign 

assistance priorities globally. 

Europe 

For Southeastern Europe, the FY 2012 request supports efforts to promote peace and stability 

and further Euro-Atlantic integration through efforts to bolster democratic institutions, 

strengthen the rule of law, encourage tolerance, and promote economic development through 

enhanced trade, investment, and job creation. The FY 2012 request is intended to help 

improve Bosnia and Herzegovina’s uneven progress on reform and support international efforts 

to shore up stability. Programs supported by this funding will foster more effective 

government structures and help expand economic opportunity by bolstering the capacity of the 

private sector to produce jobs and economic growth. The reduction in funding for Kosovo 

results in part from the normalization of the bilateral budget after several years of heightened 

assistance during its transition to independence. Resources requested will focus on building 

the capacity of Kosovo’s nascent democratic institutions and fostering economic development. 

Other priorities include funding to advance democratic reforms in Serbia, Macedonia, Albania, 

and Montenegro and consolidate and secure progress achieved in these countries to date. 

Eurasia 

U.S. assistance in Eurasia focuses on encouraging the emergence of democratic countries with 

market-based economies, and the FY 2012 request prioritizes funding to support the most 

reform-oriented countries in the region as they continue to move toward European integration. 

With Georgia’s major infrastructure and immediate recovery needs in the wake of the August 

2008 conflict with Russia met, FY 2012 funding for Georgia will focus on sustaining the 

longer-term efforts to build solid democratic institutions and provide the tools for broad-based 

economic growth. Another key focus in FY 2012 is on helping Ukraine and Moldova improve 

democratic governance, increase their energy independence, and diversify export markets. 

For Russia, the request focuses on programs to promote democracy and rule of law, and also to 

promote cooperation with the Government of Russia in areas of mutual interest, such as health, 

environment, and trade. 

86
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Central Asia 

Central Asia remains particularly unstable with economic opportunities accessible only to 

elites, ineffective local and national governments, and under-developed democratic 

institutions. Gover nments’ responsibilities to provide quality education, health care and 

municipal services are seldom met, illegal trafficking is rampant, and the overall environment 

is beginning to foster destabilizing extremism. The FY 2012 request prioritizes assistance for 

the Kyrgyz Republic to support the new Government’s efforts to reform core institutions, law 

enforcement, and increase economic opportunities. Assistance is also concentrated in 

Tajikistan, where U.S. programs are focused on bolstering security, improving governance, 

addressing deficiencies in health and education and increasing food security. 

Highlights: 

	 Ukraine ($79.1 million): U.S. assistance aims to promote the development of a 

democratic, prosperous, and secure Ukraine, fully integrated into the Euro-Atlantic 

community as it struggles to overcome the effects of the global financial crisis and signs of 

backsliding on democratic reform. Funding will promote sound economic policy to deal 

with ongoing financial challenges; help clean up and secure the Chornobyl nuclear facility; 

improve energy security; strengthen democratic institutions and accountable governance; 

and support civil society, judicial reform, and anti-corruption efforts. 

	 Georgia ($66.7 million): The FY 2012 request will continue to institutionalize 

democratic and economic development gains following the August 2008 conflict with 

Russia and further Euro-Atlantic integration and reform. U.S. programs will help 

strengthen the separation of powers, develop a more vibrant civil society and political 

plurality, bolster independent media and public access to information, enable economic 

recovery, increase energy security, and continue to improve social sector reforms. 

	 Kosovo ($63 million): Funding will help still nascent institutions adjust to the challenges 

of governance, support international bodies assisting the Government of Kosovo, develop 

judicial and law enforcement structures, drive economic growth through policy reform and 

support to key sectors, strengthen democratic institutions, and mitigate conflict by building 

tolerance. 

	 Russia ($52.3 million): Assistance will help strengthen U.S.-Russia cooperation in areas 

of mutual national interest and Russian efforts to further democratic reform. Programs 

will provide strong support for civil society, independent media, the rule of law, human 

rights, and certain health threats such as tuberculosis. Funding will also support programs 

to work with the Russian Government to combat trafficking in persons and other 

transnational threats. Conflict mitigation programs in the North Caucasus region will help 

foster development and stem the spread of instability. 

	 Kyrgyz Republic ($40.8 million): U.S. assistance is focused on addressing the Kyrgyz 

Republic’s broad, underlying development challenges and chronic instability, which were 

exacerbated by the effects of the 2010 political upheaval and ethnic violence. Programs 

will work to rebuild reformed security forces, bolster civil society and democratic 

institutions, and empower the private sector. Other programs will focus on combating 

drug trafficking and other transnational threats, and addressing social issues such as 

education and health. Agricultural programs will focus on improved land use, increased 

access to inputs, rationalized irrigation, and facilitation of the use of modern technologies. 

	 Bosnia and Herzegovina ($39 million): Funding will help Bosnia regain momentum 

towards Euro-Atlantic integration and remedy its uneven progress on reform. U.S. 

assistance will help Bosnia develop its state-level institutions, strengthen rule of law, foster 

a sound financial and business regulatory environment friendly to investment, improve the 

87
 

 

 

 

 

competitiveness of small and medium enterprises in targeted sectors, build the capacity of 

local government and civil society, and address ethnic tensions. 

	 Tajikistan ($38.8 million): Funding will emphasize increasing the stability of Tajikistan, 

particularly given its potential impact on U.S. efforts in Afghanistan. Programs will help 

strengthen the country’s border security and counter-narcotics efforts, strengthen local 

governance, combat extremism, and improve education and health. Funding will also be 

used to support the Feed the Future initiative. Programs will focus on solving systemic 

problems that contribute to food shortages and could threaten Tajikistan’s stability, such as 

water use, inadequate supplies of seeds and fertilizer, a lack of modern technologies, and 

poor livestock care. 

88
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Migration and Refugee Assistance 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

Adjusted Migration and Refugee 

Assistance 

1,693,000 1,693,000 1,613,100 

Non-War Supplemental 165,000 165,000 -

Migration and Refugee Assistance 1,858,000 1,858,000 1,693,000 1,613,100 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117), supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), and includes forward funding 

from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The international humanitarian programs of the U.S. Government provide critical protection 

and assistance to some of the world’s most vulnerable people: r efugees, internally displaced 

persons (IDPs), stateless persons, vulnerable migrants, and victims of conflict. Reflecting the 

American people’s dedication to assisting those in need, programs funded through the 

Migration and Refugee Assistance (MRA) account save lives and ease suffering while 

upholding human dignity. They help stabilize volatile situations and prevent or mitigate 

conditions that breed extremism and violence, and are an essential component of U.S. foreign 

policy. The FY 2012 MRA request of $1,613.1 million will fund contributions to key 

international humanitarian organizations such as the UN High Commissioner for Refugees and 

the International Committee of the Red Cross, as well as contributions to nongovernmental 

organization partners to address pressing humanitarian needs overseas and to resettle refugees 

in the United States. These funds support programs that meet basic needs to sustain life; 

provide protection and assistance to the most vulnerable, particularly women and children and 

the elderly; assist refugees with voluntary repatriation, local integration, or permanent 

resettlement in a third country; and foster the humane and effective management of 

international migration policies. 

Highlights: 

	 Overseas Assistance ($1,192.3 million): In both emergencies and protracted situations 

overseas, humanitarian assistance helps refugees, IDPs, stateless persons, conflict victims, 

and other vulnerable migrants to meet their basic needs and enables them to begin 

rebuilding their lives. Such support will include the provision of life-sustaining services, 

including water and sanitation, shelter, and healthcare, as well as programs that provide 

physical and legal protection to vulnerable beneficiaries and assist refugees to voluntarily 

return to their homes in safety or, when that is not an option, integrate into their host 

communities as appropriate. 

	 Refugee Admissions ($367.3 million): Resettlement is a key element of refugee 

protection and efforts to find solutions to refugee displacement when repatriation and local 

integration are not viable solutions. As the world’s largest resettlement country, the 

United States welcomes the most vulnerable refugees from a diverse array of backgrounds. 

Through domestic voluntary agency partners, these funds will help refugees to resettle in 

communities across the United States. 

89
 

 

 

 

 

 

	 Humanitarian Migrants to Israel ($20 million): This funding will maintain 

longstanding U.S. Government support for relocation and integration of Jewish migrants, 

including those from the former Soviet Union, Eastern Europe, and Africa, to Israel. 

	 Administrative Expenses ($33.5 million): The Bureau of Population, Refugees, and 

Migration is responsible for the oversight of all programs funded through the MRA 

appropriation. Funds requested for FY 2012 will be used to ensure sound stewardship of 

resources and maximum impact for beneficiary populations and American taxpayers by 

stressing accountability and transparency in its management and monitoring of these 

critical humanitarian programs. The largest portion of Administrative Expenses will 

cover the salary, benefits, and travel costs of U.S. direct hire staff, including regional 

refugee coordinators posted in U.S. Embassies around the world. 

90
 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Emergency Refugee and Migration Assistance 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

U.S. Emergency Refugee and Migration 

Assistance 

45,000 45,000 45,000 32,000 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117), supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), and includes forward funding 

from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The Emergency Refugee and Migration Assistance Fund (ERMA) serves as a contingency fund 

from which the President can draw down in order to respond effectively to humanitarian crises 

in an ever-changing international environment. The FY 2012 request of $32 million will 

maintain the ability of the United States to respond quickly to future urgent and unexpected 

refugee and migration needs. 

In FY 2010, $75.5 million was provided from ERMA to address various humanitarian 

emergencies, including assisting refugees, internally displaced persons, vulnerable migrants, 

and other victims of conflict in Somalia and Kyrgyzstan, and flooding in Pakistan. ERMA 

funds were also used to address serious food shortages around the world for those vulnerable 

people who are dependent on the international community for survival. 

91
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Peace Corps 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

Peace Corps 400,000 400,000 400,000 439,600 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117), supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), and includes forward funding 

from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The FY 2012 budget request of $439.6 million for the Peace Corps reflects President Obama’s 

strong commitment to the Peace Corps and will enable the agency to continue to strengthen and 

reform all aspects of its operations through implementation of the comprehensive agency-wide 

assessment completed in June 2010. 

The mission of the Peace Corps is firmly rooted in then-Sen. John F. Kennedy’s challenge to 

students at the University of Michigan in 1960 to serve their country in the cause of peace by 

living and working in developing countries. That mission - to promote world peace and 

friendship - remains as critical today as it was when the first generation of Peace Corps 

Volunteers was sworn into service in 1961. 

For almost 50 years, the Peace Corps’ mission has been expressed in three core goals: to help 

the people of interested countries in meeting their need for trained men and women; to help 

promote a better understanding of Americans on the part of the peoples served; and to help 

promote a better understanding of other peoples on the part of Americans. 

The Peace Corps' approach to achieving these goals is unique within the U.S. government. 

Volunteers spend 27 months living and working alongside community members. They 

interact with their host communities on a regular basis, eating the same food, living in the same 

types of houses, using the same transportation, and communicating in the local language. This 

lays the foundation for building mutual trust and understanding, while setting the stage for a 

collaboration which allows Volunteers to address host country development goals at both the 

individual and community levels. 

Since its creation, over 200,000 Americans have served as Peace Corps Volunteers, living and 

working side-by-side with local community members in 139 countries around the world. 

Volunteers serve only in those countries where they have been invited by the host government. 

Today, Volunteers in more than 75 countries assist host countries and local communities to 

improve education of students, encourage economic development, protect and restore the 

environment, increase the agricultural capabilities of farming communities, expand access to 

basic health care for families, and address HIV/AIDS prevention and care. 

Volunteers return to the United States eager and well-prepared to share what they have learned 

with friends, family members, co-workers, and the broader American public. For many 

Volunteers, this extensive exposure to international public service becomes a life’s calling, 

launching large numbers of returned Volunteers into careers dedicated to improving the lives of 

others both here in the United States and overseas. 

92
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Millennium Challenge Corporation 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

Millennium Challenge Corporation 1,105,000 1,105,000 1,105,000 1,125,100 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117), supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), and includes forward funding 

from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The FY 2012 request of $1,125.1 million will allow the Millennium Challenge Corporation 

(MCC) to continue to make significant contributions to the Administration’s foreign policy 

priorities including food security, climate change, global health, and fiscal transparency. This 

funding will help the world’s low income and lower-middle income countries reduce poverty, 

combat global health threats, develop markets, govern peacefully, and expand democracy 

worldwide. 

Since its creation in 2004, MCC has reached many milestones in the foreign assistance arena 

and is recognized as an innovative U.S. Government agency that contributes effectively to 

country-led and results-focused development aid around the world. MCC builds institutional 

capacity through “smart aid” programs with partner countries that practice good governance, 

fight corruption, invest in healthcare and education, and promote competitiveness through 

country-determined investments in such priority areas as infrastructure and agriculture. 

MCC-funded compacts are designed to maximize sustainable poverty reduction by fostering 

economic growth. MCC coordinates projects with other donors to avoid costly duplication 

and considers the role of gender and the impact on the environment. 

MCC emphasizes results and transparency through compact development and implementation. 

Economic Rate of Return estimates are generated for all of the projects in a compact, and MCC 

posts these results on its website. MCC also works with partner countries to develop detailed 

monitoring and evaluation plans for compacts and tracks the progress of its compacts and 

projects against defined benchmarks and outcomes, also available on MCC’s website. 

The first step in MCC’s grant making process is for MCC’s Board of Directors (Board) to 

determine those countries that are compact eligible, and the eligible countries MCC will seek to 

partner with through a compact. When making eligibility determinations the Board starts with 

a list of candidate countries and the countries’ performance on seventeen independent and 

transparent policy indicators in three categories: ruling justly, investing in people, and 

economic freedom. In addition to the performance indicators, the Board factors in the 

availability of funds to MCC and the ability to reduce poverty and improve economic growth in 

a particular country into the compact eligibility determination. After the Board approves a 

country as compact eligible, MCC works with selected countries to assist in the development of 

a compact. Compact countries are principally responsible for identifying and prioritizing their 

own barriers to poverty reduction and economic growth and use public consultation as one of 

the primary methods to determine compact projects. Such engagement bolsters democratic 

practices and transparency as well the country’s ownership of its development progress. 

Placing countries in charge of their own development-country ownership-can be difficult in 

light of capacity constraints, but MCC believes it is the best way to achieve sustainable results. 

93
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Since its inception, MCC has signed 22 compacts and 23 threshold agreements, committing 

over $8.3 billion to worldwide poverty reduction through results-driven programs built on 

measureable and transparent objectives. Thanks to MCC development programs, training for 

more than 146,000 farmers has boosted productivity and food security, and construction or 

completion of more than 3,300 kilometers of roads now provides improved access to markets, 

schools, and health clinics. 

MCC will sign a compact with Malawi in February, 2011 and is in the process of working with 

Zambia and Indonesia to develop a first compact, and with Cape Verde for a second compact. 

For FY 2012, MCC anticipates second compacts with Ghana and Georgia. These investments 

are examples of “smart aid” and will help to foster stability through economic growth and 

poverty reduction with these strategic and high performing partners. 

94
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Inter-American Foundation 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

Inter-American Foundation 23,000 23,000 23,000 19,100 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117), supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), and includes forward funding 

from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The FY 2012 request of $19.1 million for the Inter-American Foundation (IAF) will enable the 

agency to provide targeted, small-dollar investments to help marginalized, poor communities in 

the Western Hemisphere to undertake their own development initiatives. The FY 2012 budget 

cuts IAF by nearly 20 percent in order to better prioritize scarce foreign assistance funding. 

However, IAF can maintain its current program level by seeking partnerships with the U.S. 

Government and private sector and reducing overhead. In FY 2012, the IAF will support U.S. 

Government priorities and interests in Latin America and the Caribbean to reduce poverty, 

contribute to an environment of increased personal security, and foster better economic 

development by supporting projects that create jobs, increase incomes, improve food security, 

promote sustainable agricultural practices, preserve the environment, and improve access to 

water, utilities and basic housing. 

Through its 40 years of experience, the IAF has developed specialized expertise in unleashing 

the power of the poor to help themselves and advance their communities. The IAF’s 

investment of nearly $700 million has enabled grantees to mobilize nearly $1 billion more from 

local, regional, and private sources. 

The IAF will continue to lever development resources into long-term, strategic benefits for the 

poor in order to maximize the impact of U.S. Government dollars. One example is the 

RedEAmerica initiative, through which Latin American corporate foundations direct an 

additional two dollars for every dollar invested by the IAF into grassroots development. This 

initiative has helped corporate partners move away from charitable philanthropy to more 

strategic investments that promote long-term, self-help development. Similarly, by sharing 

our experience and know-how with community foundations, hometown associations, and other 

diaspora groups, the IAF will help channel more resources into effective development projects 

that deliver concrete results in communities with the greatest need. 

The IAF will complement and enhance the value of investments made by other U.S. foreign 

assistance agencies by providing small amounts of support to help the organized poor take 

advantage of infrastructure and other large-scale investments or new trade opportunities. 

95
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

African Development Foundation 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

African Development Foundation 30,000 30,000 30,000 24,000 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117), supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), and includes forward funding 

from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The FY 2012 request of $24 million will permit the African Development Foundation (ADF) to 

provide funding to Africa’s most often marginalized and under-served communities situated in 

more than 20 countries. The grant funds are provided directly to community groups to 

improve local food production and processing capabilities, and to address other locally 

identified development needs. The FY 2012 budget cuts ADF by 20 percent in order to better 

prioritize scarce foreign assistance funding. However, ADF can maintain its current program 

level by seeking partnerships within the U.S. Government and private sector and reducing 

overhead. 

As an independent federal agency, ADF was established to respond quickly and in a 

cost-effective manner to African designed and managed development solutions at the 

grassroots level. ADF provides grants of up to $250,000 directly to community groups, 

agricultural cooperatives, and small enterprises in Africa. Over 75% of ADF programming is 

focused on agriculture development and food security. T hese grants help organizations 

increase the number of jobs in African communities, improve family income levels, and 

address social development needs. ADF also funds African nongovernmental organizations in 

each country to provide technical assistance to grantees. This approach improves the outcome 

of each project grant. 

96
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Department of the Treasury 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/4/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/4/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

Treasury Technical Assistance 32,100 32,100 25,000 30,120 

Debt Restructuring 60,000 60,000 60,000 15,000 

Department of the Treasury 92,100 92,100 85,000 45,120 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117), supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), and includes forward funding 

from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

4/The FY 2010 Enacted and Actual Totals for Treasury Technical Assistance includes $7.1 million of supplemental funding from 

the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

Treasury Technical Assistance 

The FY 2012 request of $30.1 million for the Department of Treasury’s International Affairs 

Technical Assistance Program provides highly experienced financial advisors to 

reform-minded developing countries, transitional economies, and nations recovering from 

conflict. Through the Office of Technical Assistance (OTA), Treasury advisors work 

side-by-side with government officials in finance ministries and central banks in more than 

fifty countries to strengthen their capacity to manage public finances - through efficient 

revenue collection, well-planned and executed budgets, judicious debt management, 

fundamentally sound banking systems, and strong controls to combat corruption and economic 

crimes. The proposed budget supports Treasury's work to strengthen financial infrastructure 

and counter terrorist financing in national security priority countries where long-term stability 

will depend on strong financial governance. Further, the request allows for a modest, but 

important expansion of OTA's work in priority areas, including infrastructure finance, and 

increasing access to financial services and climate finance, both G20 commitments. The 

request will also enable OTA to strengthen its assistance in enhanced engagement regions, such 

as the East African Community, or countries, such as El Salvador, in furtherance of the 

Presidential Policy Directive on Global Development. 

Debt Restructuring 

The FY 2012 request of $15 million will be used to support Treasury implementation of the 

Tropical Forest Conservation Act which authorizes debt relief for low and middle income 

countries to support conservation of tropical forests. Under the program, treated debt is 

reduced and “redirected” to provide for grants to local nongovernmental organizations and 

other entities engaged in forest conservation in the beneficiary country. The United States 

uses appropriated funds to pay for the budget cost of this debt reduction and redirection. To 

date, the United States has concluded 17 TFCA agreements in 14 countries. These agreements 

will together generate over $260 million for tropical forest conservation, which will help 

further reduce the impact of climate change on the United States and other nations. TFCA 

helps protect the biodiversity found in tropical forests around the world, while also protecting 

critical ecosystems. 

97
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

Adjusted International Narcotics Control 

and Law Enforcement 

1,848,000 1,848,000 1,511,838 

Non-War Supplemental 322,660 322,660 -

International Narcotics Control and Law 

Enforcement 

2,170,660 2,170,660 1,597,000 1,511,838 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117), supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), and includes forward funding 

from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement (INCLE) request of $1,511.8 

million will continue to support country and global programs critical to combating 

transnational crime and illicit threats, including efforts against terrorist and other criminal 

networks involved in the illegal drug trade, as well as other illicit enterprises. INCLE 

programs seek to close the gaps between law enforcement jurisdictions and to strengthen law 

enforcement institutions that are weak or corrupt. 

Significant INCLE funds are focused where security situations are most dire, and where U.S. 

resources are used in tandem with host country government strategies in order to maximize 

impact. In countries that have specific challenges to overcome, INCLE resources can help to 

establish a stable and secure environment, including in Iraq (which is included in the Overseas 

Contingency Operations section), Afghanistan, Pakistan, West Bank and Gaza, Yemen, 

Lebanon, Mexico, Central America, Colombia, Sudan, and Liberia. The Near East, South and 

Central Asia, and Western Hemisphere account for most of the INCLE request, although 

continuing concerns in both Africa and East Asia (i.e., West Africa and Indonesia) require 

continued policy and programmatic attention. 

Highlights: 

Africa 

 Sudan ($37 million): Funding will support the development of southern Sudanese 

capacity to provide security in support of the rule of law in a post-referendum setting. 

Funds will provide technical assistance and training for southern Sudan’s criminal justice 

sector and law enforcement institutions, as well as contribute toward UN civilian police 

and formed police units in southern Sudan and Darfur. 

 Liberia ($17 million): In order to continue Liberia’s transition to peace the country’s 

police and justice institutions require much greater levels of support. Assistance will 

continue to fund a civilian police contribution to the United Nations Mission in Liberia and 

increase support to critical bilateral police and justice reform projects. Advisors will 

provide training and mentorship on a range of issues such as investigation skills, 

leadership, and sexual and gender based violence. Technical assistance will be 

98
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

supplemented by material assistance such as infrastructure support, communications 

equipment, and office supplies which will be provided throughout the country to the police, 

the judiciary, the corrections system, and the justice ministry. 

	 Africa Regional ($19.2 million): Funding includes three initiatives covering different 

regions in Africa. These funds are divided among the- Trans-Sahara Counter-terrorism 

Partnership (TSCTP), Partnership for Regional East African Counter Terrorism 

(PREACT), formerly known as East Africa Regional Strategic Initiative (EARSI), and a 

new initiative named West Africa Regional Security Initiative (WARSI). WARSI focuses 

on establishing and sustaining effective, professional, and accountable law enforcement 

services as well as improving the capacity and sustainability of civil and criminal justice 

sector actors and institutions in West Africa. The initiative provides technical assistance, 

advice, and training to facilitate partner efforts to counter transnational threats such as 

illicit trafficking in arms, persons, and drugs and to strengthen conflict mitigation and state 

legitimacy. This initiative subsumes West African programs requested bilaterally in past 

years. 

Near East 

	 West Bank and Gaza ($113 million): Funding will continue to support efforts to reform 

the security sector by providing training, equipment, and infrastructure support to the 

Palestinian Authority Security Forces and by providing the Ministry of Interior with 

technical assistance and program support to improve its ability to manage the security 

forces. Additional training, equipment, infrastructure support, and technical assistance 

will be provided for the justice and corrections sectors to ensure their development keeps 

pace with the increased performance of the security forces. 

	 Lebanon ($25 million): Support for Lebanon’s security forces has been a key component 

of U.S. efforts to strengthen the institutions of the Lebanese state, promoting stability and 

security in both Lebanon and the region. The United States is closely watching recent 

developments in Lebanon. The next government should be judged by its actions and 

decisions. Until there is a new Lebanese government, it is premature to make any 

determinations about the future of U.S. assistance to Lebanon. However, it is important 

that the United States continue to plan for ongoing assistance through FY 2012 as an 

incentive for the next government and to consolidate gains. 

	 Yemen ($11 million): Funds will support efforts to enhance justice, security, and the rule 

of law in Yemen by building a more professional, accessible, and accountable criminal 

justice system. Techn ical assistance, training, and equipment will be provided to Yemen’s 

civilian law enforcement and judicial institutions. Specifically, funds will support efforts 

to enhance the Yemeni government’s delivery of basic policing and justice services that 

respond to citizens’ crime and public safety concerns, particularly in underserved regions, 

and that combat the influence of Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP). Assistance 

will also foster more professional, accountable, and responsive criminal justice institutions 

and help the government provide correctional services that respect human rights and 

counter radicalization. 

South Asia 

	 Afghanistan ($324 million): Programs will focus on addressing two of the greatest 

strategic challenges facing the United States in the war in Afghanistan - Afghan rule of law 

development and the drug trade that fuels the insurgency. Funds will maintain the current 

presence of the longstanding and successful Justice Sector Support Program (JSSP) and 

Corrections System Support Program (CSSP) in the Afghan provinces of Kabul, Herat, 

99
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nangarhar, Balkh, Kunduz, Kandahar, Paktia, and Bamiyan as well as mentoring presence 

in the national-level institutions including the Attorney General’s Office, Ministry of 

Justice, Supreme Court, and Ministry of Women’s Affairs. Funding will also support the 

expansion of the Judicial Security Unit program and provide initial capacity building and 

mentoring to the Ministry of Justice as it prepares to assume responsibility for detainees 

transitioned from U.S. military custody. Funding will also continue to support juvenile 

and Ministry of the Interior detention facilities, maintain assistance to women and their 

children in prison, and continue providing support for legal aid. Finally, funding will 

continue support to the Major Crimes Task Force, the Anti-Corruption Unit, and the 

Counter-Narcotics Justice Center (CNJC). 

Afghanistan’s drug trade funds insurgent operations, undermines the Afghan government, 

and is a stumbling block to a sustainable transition of U.S. assistance to Afghan leadership. 

The FY 2012 budget will continue to strengthen the ability of the Counternarcotics Police 

of Afghanistan to interdict drug smugglers and disrupt criminal networks, both 

independently and in partnership with neighboring countries; increase the capacity of the 

central Ministry of Counter Narcotics (MCN) to formulate and coordinate national-level 

drug policy; continue Afghan-led efforts to implement counternarcotics public information 

programs via radio, television, and mobile theater; and promote regional cooperation 

against the drug trade between Afghanistan and its neighbors. Funding will also continue 

drug demand reduction efforts with support to outreach, treatment, and rehabilitation 

centers. 

	 Pakistan ($125 million): In support of the Administration’s top national security 

priorities, funding will expand civilian law enforcement assistance throughout Pakistan and 

support an expanded border security aviation fleet. This critical support will provide 

training, equipment, infrastructure, and aviation assistance to civilian law enforcement and 

border security agencies that are responsible for maintaining peace and security following 

military operations. Funds will also continue current border security, law enforcement, 

and judicial system reform; and counternarcotics programs. 

Western Hemisphere 

	 Mexico ($248.5 million): The United States and Mexican Governments will continue to 

focus on four pillars of cooperation: disrupting and dismantling criminal organizations, 

institutionalizing the rule of law, building a 21st Century border, and building strong and 

resilient communities. Programs will focus heavily on developing Mexico’s rule of law 

institutions through training, technical assistance, and limited equipment purchases. 

Programs will continue to provide assistance to federal level criminal justice institutions, 

including law enforcement, prosecutorial, judicial, and corrections institutions. Funding 

will increasingly support similar programs for state and local institutions, especially in 

areas of high criminal activity in Mexico - for example, along the Mexico’s northern 

border. These efforts will also support efforts at the federal level. 

	 Colombia ($160.6 million): Funding will focus on supporting Colombian-led 

consolidation programs that seek to expand security, reduce drug trafficking and illicit drug 

growth and promote economic development through a comprehensive 

whole-of-government approach in former conflict areas. Consolidation efforts not only 

address lingering security threats in Colombia, but they also utilize traditional interdiction 

and eradication programs to prevent illegal drugs from reaching the United States and 

further disrupting the transit zone. U.S. assistance in FY 2012 will also help improve 

Colombia’s judicial institutions, including enhancing the protection of human rights and 

developing local capacity to address sensitive criminal cases. INCLE resources in 

Colombia will aid the Colombian National Police in assuming additional security 

100
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

responsibilities and combating emerging criminal drug organizations and also fund 

important military programs such as navy maritime interdiction. Coordinated efforts to 

nationalize planned financial and operational responsibilities in a sustainable manner will 

require FY 2012 funding for successful completion. 

	 Peru ($29 million): Funding will support efforts by the Government of Peru (GOP) to 

eliminate the illicit drug industry, which includes extending state presence in the Apurimac 

and Ene River Valleys in order to oppose drug traffickers aligned with the Shining Path 

terrorist group. The program will support drug interdiction and coca eradication 

operations as well as precursor chemical seizures; improve controls at ports and airports; 

modernize and refurbish police stations and bases; and maintain and replace 

communications equipment and vehicles. 

	 Bolivia ($10 million): Funds will advance nationalization efforts by shifting costs for 

such programs as eradication to the Government of Bolivia -- continuing targeted technical 

assistance for counternarcotics, law enforcement, and rule of law programs, while seeking 

cost efficiencies with the Government of Bolivia (GOB). Support will continue extensive 

training programs for counternarcotics and other police; support interdiction efforts at 

reduced levels; build the capacity of law enforcement, prosecutor’s and the judiciary; 

support trafficking-in-persons and other rule of law initiatives; and continue public 

awareness on the damage caused to Bolivian society by drug trafficking and consumption. 

	 Haiti ($19.4 million): Assistance will support the UN stabilization mission 

(MINUSTAH) and related activities through civilian police, counternarcotics, rule of law 

and corrections programs and support efforts to rebuild operational capacity of the Haitian 

National Police with infrastructure improvements and specialized equipment and training. 

	 Central America Regional Security Initiative (CARSI) ($55 million): Citizen safety 

in Central America is deteriorating rapidly as criminal organizations seek to establish 

strongholds in the region. Funds will continue to support training and build capacity of 

law enforcement and rule of law institutions throughout Central America, with less focus 

on procurement of equipment. Funds will support efforts to address border and port 

security; continue support for vetted units and maritime and land interdiction; sustain the 

final year of the four-year investment for aviation based in Guatemala; continue to build 

capacity of law enforcement and other actors to address transnational crime, including 

anti-gang training. Funds will also support improved prison management and equipment 

and encourage cooperation and joint operations throughout the region. The program 

reduces funds for basic law enforcement equipment, while continuing to provide programs 

that support justice sector reform and local capabilities. 

	 Caribbean Basin Security Initiative (CBSI) ($30 million): Funding will continue to 

support efforts to combat illicit trafficking and organized crime, strengthen the rule of law, 

reduce the demand for illegal drugs and promote social justice in the Caribbean region. 

Funding will be directed primarily toward enhancing the capacity of criminal justice and 

regional security institutions such as the Regional Security System in the Eastern 

Caribbean but will also provide technical assistance to support the investigation and 

prosecution of financial crimes, prison reform, maritime interdiction, and border control 

efforts. 

101
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Global Programs 

These programs target challenges to transnational crime and counternarcotics efforts, and 

policing in peacekeeping and crisis response operations worldwide. Key components include: 

 Inter-regional Aviation Support ($60.7 million): Funding will provide centralized core 

services for counternarcotics and border security aviation programs. These programs 

involve fixed- and rotary-wing aircraft deployed worldwide. 

 Program Development and Support ($34.5 million): Fu nding will provide for annual 

costs of direct hires, contractors, travel and transportation, equipment, communications and 

utilities, and other support services. 

 International Law Enforcement Academy (ILEA) ($31.3 million): Funds will support 

existing ILEAs in Bangkok, Budapest, Gaborone, Roswell, San Salvador, and the Regional 

Training Center (RTC) in Lima. Additionally, funds made available to support the Shared 

Security Partnership (SSP) initiative will further develop an RTC for West Africa, which 

will be affiliated with ILEA Gaborone, and contribute to new training efforts to support 

SSP in other strategic regions worldwide with ties to terrorism, corruption and other 

transnational criminal activities. Funds will also support continued transition of the Lima 

RTC into a permanent ILEA for the Southern Cone and Andean regions; further develop an 

internet-based ILEA Alumni Global Network to encourage bilateral and regional 

cooperation; facilitate distance learning; and provide equipment and technical support for 

ILEA participating countries. 

 Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons ($20.8 million): Thes e funds 

will assist committed governments of countries ranked as Tier 3, Tier 2 Watch List and 

some Tier 2 of the 2010 annual Trafficking in Persons Report to improve their capacity to 

combat trafficking in persons through rule of law and criminal justice sector improvements 

as well as victim protection services. 

 Critical Flight Safety Program ($17.3 million): Fu nding will provide programmed 

depot-level maintenance for the fixed- and rotary-wing aircraft fleet supporting 

counternarcotics and border security aviation programs worldwide. 

 International Police Peacekeeping Operations Support (IPPOS) ($15 million): This 

is an important new initiative that build capacity of police contributing countries to deploy 

highly trained and well-equipped police to peacekeeping and stabilization missions, as well 

as help the United Nations with the coordination, policy, and projects in support of policing 

in peacekeeping missions. Funding will be used for training and capacity building efforts. 

 Demand Reduction ($12.8 million): Funding will support programs designed to reduce 

drug use, related crime and violence, and high-risk injecting drug use behavior. Funds 

will support sub-regional demand reduction training centers, regional and global 

knowledge exchange forums, development of national and regional drug-free community 

coalitions, and research and demonstration program development, with emphasis on 

specialized initiatives for drug addicted women and children. 

 Civilian Police ($4 million): Funding will strengthen the Department’s ability to launch 

quality criminal justice and law enforcement programs globally, a critical task for 

preventing and responding to conflict and counternarcotics and anti-crime efforts. 

Funding will be used to further develop and maintain a cadre of police, justice sector and 

corrections senior experts who provide a key resource to the Department in conducting 

technical assessments, program development, monitoring and evaluation, and coordination 

102
 

 

 

with law enforcement, the interagency and international organizations. Funds will also 

support the continued development of policies and procedures to guide field and 

Washington based staff, and will support a program to directly manage pre-deployment 

training of contracted personnel in the field through the new Department-managed 

Executive Conference and Training Center in Sterling, Virginia. Finally, funds will 

continue to support the already fruitful efforts to both recruit and partner with state, 

municipal, and county level police, justice, and corrections personnel to implement and 

provide expertise to INCLE programs. 

103
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nonproliferation, Anti-Terrorism, Demining 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

Nonproliferation, Anti-Terrorism, 

Demining 

754,000 754,000 754,000 708,540 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117), supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), and includes forward funding 

from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The FY 2012 Nonproliferation, Anti-Terrorism, Demining and Related Programs (NADR) 

request of $708.5 million will support critical security and humanitarian-related priority 

interventions. The request includes increases for the voluntary contribution to the 

International Atomic Energy Agency to demonstrate robust U.S. support for the agency, and for 

the Global Threat Reduction Program to strengthen biosecurity. 

Highlights: 

Nonproliferation Activities 

	 The Nonproliferation and Disarmament Fund (NDF) ($30 million) supports programs to 

halt the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (WMD), their delivery systems, and 

advanced conventional weapons systems, with particular emphasis on denying such 

weapons to terrorists. The NDF’s special authorities allow it to undertake rapid-response 

threat reduction work around the globe and can be used to support multinational exercises 

under the Proliferation Security Initiative. NDF funds also support the destruction of 

existing weapons. 

	 The Global Threat Reduction program ($69 million) supports specialized activities aimed 

at reducing the threat of terrorist or state acquisition of WMD materials and expertise, 

through such activities as scientist redirection and engagement, and security upgrades at 

biological and chemical agent laboratories and facilities. 

	 The voluntary contribution to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) ($85.9 

million) supports programs in nuclear safeguards, nuclear safety and security, nuclear 

energy, and the peaceful use of nuclear science technologies. This request represents a 

significant increase of the U.S. contribution to the IAEA as part of a multi-year 

commitment to the organization. 

	 The worldwide Export Control and Related Border Security (EXBS) program ($60.9 

million) seeks to prevent states and terrorist organizations from acquiring WMD, their 

delivery systems, and destabilizing conventional weapons by helping partner countries to 

develop comprehensive export and border control systems. The program builds capacity 

to ensure transfer authorizations support only legitimate trade and to detect and interdict 

illicit transfers at borders. 

	 The voluntary contribution to the Preparatory Commission of the Comprehensive 

Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization ($33 million) helps to fund the establishment, 

operation, and maintenance of the worldwide International Monitoring System. In 

104
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

addition, $7.5 million will fund specific projects to increase the effectiveness and 

efficiency of the Treaty’s verification regime. 

	 The WMD Terrorism program ($6 million) undertakes specialized, targeted projects to 

improve international capacities to prepare for and respond to a terrorist attack involving 

weapons of mass destruction in support of the Global Initiative to Combat Nuclear 

Terrorism, and to help develop capacity among our international partners to deter, detect, 

and respond to nuclear smuggling. 

	 The U.S. voluntary contribution to the United Nations ($1.5 million) will support 

international implementation of U.N. Security Council Resolution 1540, which requires 

that all U.N. member states establish domestic controls to stem the proliferation of WMD. 

Anti -Terrorism Programs 

	 The Anti-Terrorism Assistance program ($192.7 million) has long been the U.S. government’s 

flagship program for counterterrorism law enforcement assistance to critical partner countries. The 

program provides training and equipment to help build the anti-terrorism capacities of friendly 

nations, to strengthen bilateral ties, and to increase respect for human rights. ATA helps partner 

countries to build a wide range of counterterrorism capabilities, including border security, critical 

infrastructure protection, national leadership protection, response to and management of terrorist and 

mass casualty incidents, investigative skills, response to weapons of mass destruction attacks, and 

response to kidnapping for ransom crimes. ATA also supports the Regional Strategic Initiative 

(RSI) by providing advanced anti-terrorism training that addresses regional challenges. 

	 The Countering Violent Extremism program ($5 million) supports targeted 

counter-radicalization interventions in high priority countries by promoting positive 

alternatives to violence, with a special focus on at-risk youth. Programming includes the 

creation of positive narratives to contest militant propaganda and leadership development to 

help build civil society as a bulwark against violent extremism. 

	 The Terrorist Interdiction Program/Personal Identification, Secure Comparison, & Evaluation 

System (TIP/PISCES) program ($42 million) provides computerized watch-listing systems to 

partner nations that enable immigration and border control officials to quickly identify suspect 

persons attempting to enter or leave their countries. The request provides funds to complete 

the deployment of critical biometrics enhancements begun in FY 2010 to assist 17 partner 

nations, supports continued system expansion into critical partner and candidate nations 

vulnerable to terrorist travel (such as Iraq, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Yemen, Kenya, and 

Thailand), allows development and testing of expanded capabilities to address U.S. 

requirements regarding biometric data collection, and ensures that the PISCES system 

maintains standards in accordance with international norms. 

 	 The Counterterrorism Financing (CTF) program ($17 million) assists frontline partners in 

detecting, disrupting, and dismantling terrorist financial networks. CTF funds are used for 

anti-money laundering and counterterrorism finance capacity-building aimed at assisting 

our foreign partners in developing comprehensive and effective legal frameworks and 

regulatory regimes, active and capable financial investigative units, as well as 

strengthening the investigative skills of law enforcement entities, bolstering prosecutorial 

and judicial development and countering bulk cash smuggling. CTF also works with the 

Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs to ensure that recipients of 

NADR funding implement action plans to comply with international standards against 

money laundering and the financing of terrorism. 

 Counterterrorism Engagement ($8 million) supports key bilateral, multilateral, and 

regional efforts, including the RSI, to build political will at senior levels in partner nations 

105
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

for shared counterterrorism challenges. By working with other government agencies and 

with nongovernmental organizations, we can support initiatives and training including 

through the United Nations and regional bodies to bring terrorists to justice, strengthen 

transportation security, and increase cyber security. This funding will also support 

initiatives with regard to the establishment and activities of the Global Counterterrorism 

Forum. 

Regional Stability and Humanitarian Assistance 

	 The Conventional Weapons Destruction (CWD) program ($150 million) advances security 

interests by responding to the security threat and risk to indigenous populations posed by 

landmines and unexploded ordnance, and from excess, loosely-secured, or 

otherwise-at-risk small arms and light weapons, Man Portable Air-Defense Systems 

(MANPADS), and ammunition. The program also enhances stockpile security, increases 

local capabilities through training programs, and provides limited funding for victims’ 

assistance. Included in this request is funding for $1.4 million in program development 

and support, $2.5 million for cross-cutting initiatives to support sustainment efforts, and 

$2.5 million for emergency assessments to help partner countries mitigate risks from 

potentially dangerous depots, as well as operations to safely remove and dispose of 

materials following incidents at these facilities. An estimated $25 million will fund the 

continued implementation of an aggressive program to reduce the global threat of illicitly 

held or at-risk MANPADS through safe and effective, destruction efforts. The USG also 

pursues the reduction of MANPADS threats against aircraft by chairing the Interagency 

Coordinating Group for International Aviation Threat Reduction. In addition, global 

funding will continue to cover other emergency requirements and high priority weapons 

destruction projects and unforeseen mandates that occur during the execution year. 

106
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Peacekeeping Operations 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

Peacekeeping Operations 331,500 331,500 331,500 292,000 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117), supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), and includes forward funding 

from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The FY 2012 request for Peacekeeping Operations (PKO) of $292 million will help diminish 

and resolve conflict, enhance the ability of states to participate in peacekeeping and stability 

operations, address counterterrorism threats, and reform military establishments into 

professional military forces with respect for the rule of law in the aftermath of conflict. 

The request supports two ongoing regional peacekeeping missions: the African Union 

Mission in Somalia and the Multinational Force and Observers mission in the Sinai. The 

request also supports the ability of states to participate in peacekeeping operations through the 

Global Peace Operations Initiative (GPOI); enhances the ability of states to address 

counterterrorism threats through the Trans-Sahara Counterterrorism Partnership (TSCTP) and 

the Partnership for Regional East Africa Counter Terrorism (PREACT), formerly known as the 

East Africa Regional Strategic Initiative (EARSI); supports long-term reforms to military 

forces in the aftermath of conflict into professional military forces with respect for the rule of 

law, including those in Southern Sudan, Liberia, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and 

Somalia; addresses regional conflict stabilization and border security issues in Africa; and 

provides regional maritime security training in Africa. 

Highlights: 

	 Global Peace Operations Initiative ($91.9 million): From FY 2005 through FY 2009, 

GPOI funds trained over 100,000 peacekeepers, well beyond its goal of 75,000 worldwide. 

The program emphasis for the third year of Phase II will continue the shift begun in FY 

2010 from the direct training of peacekeepers to a focus on building a sustainable 

indigenous peacekeeping capacity. While FY 2012 funds will continue to provide 

training, equipment, and sustainment of peacekeeping troops, activities will focus on 

strengthening partner-country capabilities to train their own peacekeeping units by 

supporting the development of indigenous peacekeeping trainer cadres, peacekeeping 

training centers, and other self-sufficiency oriented programs, events, and activities. 

Funds will also enable the United States to continue to enhance and contribute to the lift 

and sustainment of troops to peacekeeping operations worldwide. Some FY 2012 funds 

will be used to continue GPOI support for collaboration with the Center for Excellence in 

Stability Police Operations (CoESPU). Finally, PKO funds will continue to underwrite an 

evaluation and metrics mechanism, including measures of effectiveness, to ensure GPOI is 

achieving its goals. 

	 Sudan ($60 million): FY 2012 funds will be used to continue long-term efforts to build 

and transform the Sudan People’s Liberation Army in Southern Sudan from a guerilla army 

to a professional military force subordinate to civilian leadership and protective of human 

rights. Funds will continue to provide support for this transformation process, including 

107
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

the refurbishment, operations, and maintenance of divisional and sector headquarters; 

strategic and operational advisory assistance; unit and individual professional training; and 

communications and other non-lethal equipment for the military. 

	 Somalia ($51 million): FY 2012 funds will be used to continue support to the African 

Union-led peacekeeping effort in Somalia, including training, equipment, and 

transportation of forces from current and new troop-contributing countries. Funds to pay 

the United States' portion of the UN assessment for support of the UN Support Office for 

the African Union Mission in Somalia (AMISOM) are being requested in the Contributions 

to International Peacekeeping Activities account. Funds will also be used to 

professionalize and provide operational support to Somali security forces, to ensure their 

capability in contributing to national peace and security in support of the international 

peace process efforts, and as part of a multi-sectoral approach to post-conflict security 

sector reform. 

	 Multinational Force and Observers ($26 million): The FY 2012 request includes funds 

to continue the U.S. contribution to the Multinational Force and Observers mission in the 

Sinai. 

	 Trans-Sahara Counterterrorism Partnership ($20 million): The FY 2012 request 

continues support for the TSCTP, a multi-disciplinary counterterrorism initiative designed 

to counter terrorist threats, strengthen regional capacity, promote interoperability, and 

facilitate coordination between countries. Funds will support advisory assistance, modest 

infrastructure improvement, and training and equipping of counterterrorist military units in 

the West and North African regions. 

	 Democratic Republic of the Congo ($19 million): FY 2012 funds will be used to 

continue long-term efforts to reform the military in the Democratic Republic of the Congo 

(DRC) into a force capable of maintaining peace and security, to include sustaining a light 

infantry battalion to stabilize eastern DRC. Funds will support advisory assistance at 

strategic and operational levels, training, equipment, and infrastructure improvement. 

	 Partnership for Regional East Africa Counterterrorism ($10 million): The FY 2012 

request continues support for PREACT, formerly known as EARSI, a multi-disciplinary 

counterterrorism initiative in East Africa that is based upon best practices of the TSCTP. 

Funds will support advisory assistance, and training and equipping of counterterrorist 

military units in the East Africa region. 

	 Africa Conflict Stabilization and Border Security ($7.2 million): The FY 2012 

request continues efforts to address and stabilize regional crises on the African continent. 

In particular, funds will support areas such as the Great Lakes region in Central Africa, the 

Mano River region in West Africa (including neighboring Cote d’Ivoire and 

Guinea-Bissau), the Horn of Africa, countering the Lord’s Resistance Army in Central and 

East Africa, and spillover from the conflict in Sudan into neighboring Chad and the Central 

African Republic. Funds will support monitoring teams, advisory assistance, training, 

logistical support, infrastructure enhancements, and equipment. 

	 Liberia ($5 million): The FY 2012 request funds the long term effort to transform the 

Liberian military into a professional, 2,100-member-strong armed force that respects the 

rule of law and has the capacity to protect Liberia’s borders and maintain adequate security 

in the country. Funds will primarily provide for operational support of existing 

infrastructure of the new military during the first full year in which all of those facilities are 

under the control of the Government of Liberia. Completion of this program will help 

facilitate the eventual departure of the United Nations Mission in Liberia. 

108
 

 

 

 

 

	 Africa Maritime Security Initiative (AMSI) ($2 million): The FY 2012 request funds a 

continuation of a program begun in FY 2010 to increase African maritime security 

capabilities through the provision of regional training activities (including the training 

component of the Department of Defense’s Africa Partnership Station program) and 

provide modest training equipment. By enhancing U.S. partners’ maritime enforcement 

capabilities, the initiative helps to develop African maritime forces that can better respond 

to piracy, terrorist activity, illegal fishing, environmental threats, and trafficking in drugs, 

arms, and humans. 

109
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

International Military Education and Training 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

International Military Education and 

Training 

108,000 108,000 108,000 109,954 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117), supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), and includes forward funding 

from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The FY 2012 request for the International Military Education and Training (IMET) program is 

$110 million. IMET is a key component of U.S. security assistance which promotes regional 

stability and defense capabilities through professional military training and education. 

Through professional and technical courses and specialized instruction, most of which are 

conducted at military schoolhouses in the United States, the program provides students from 

allied and friendly nations with valuable training and education on U.S. military practices and 

standards. IMET students are exposed to the concepts of democratic values and respect for 

internationally-recognized standards of human rights both through the courses they attend and 

through their experience of living in and being a part of local communities across the United 

States. IMET serves as an effective means to strengthen military alliances and international 

coalitions critical to U.S. national security goals. IMET also helps to develop a common 

understanding of shared international challenges, including terrorism, and fosters the 

relationships necessary to counter those challenges in a collaborative manner. 

Highlights: 

	 Africa ($15.5 million): IMET programs focus on professionalizing the defense forces to 

support efforts to respond to regional crises and provide for long-term stability on the 

continent. Major IMET programs are focused on Ethiopia, Kenya, Nigeria, Senegal, and 

South Africa - states critical to long-term regional peace and stability. 

	 East Asia and the Pacific ($9.2 million): IMET programs focus on professionalizing the 

defense forces of regional partners and developing their skills in fighting terror. Priority 

recipients will include Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Thailand, and Vietnam. 

	 Europe ($30.1 million): IMET programs enhance regional security and integration 

among United States, NATO, and European armed forces. Perhaps most importantly it 

helps to ensure that those nations who fight alongside the United States in places like 

Afghanistan have officers that understand and appreciate the doctrine and operational 

tactics of the U.S. military. The largest programs are those in Bulgaria, the Czech 

Republic, Georgia, Poland, Romania, Turkey, and Ukraine. 

	 Near East ($18.3 million): IMET programs focus on Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, 

Morocco, Oman, and Tunisia with the purpose of enhancing professionalism, providing the 

technical training necessary to maintain equipment of United States origin, and increasing 

awareness of international norms of human rights and civilian control of the military. 

110
 

 

 

	 South and Central Asia ($14.7 million): IMET includes major programs in India and 

Pakistan, as well as support for training military officers in the Afghan National Army. 

	 Western Hemisphere ($16.6 million): IMET programs focus on professionalizing 

defense forces, including those of Colombia, El Salvador, and Mexico, and enhancing their 

ability to respond to regional security challenges. 

111
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign Military Financing 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

Adjusted Foreign Military Financing 5,470,000 5,476,169 5,550,463 

Non-War Supplemental 50,000 50,000 -

Foreign Military Financing 5,520,000 5,526,169 5,160,000 5,550,463 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117), supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), and includes forward funding 

from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The FY 2012 request for Foreign Military Financing (FMF) of $5,550.5 million furthers U.S. 

interests around the world by ensuring that Coalition partners and friendly foreign governments 

are equipped and trained to work toward common security goals and share burdens in joint 

missions. FMF promotes U.S. national security by contributing to regional and global 

stability, strengthening military support for democratically-elected governments, and 

containing transnational threats including terrorism and trafficking in narcotics, weapons, and 

persons. Increas ed military capabilities establish and strengthen multilateral coalitions with 

the United States, and enable friends and allies to be increasingly interoperable with U.S., 

regional, and international military forces. FMF assistance will also support ongoing efforts to 

incorporate the most recent North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) members into the 

organization, support prospective NATO members and Coalition partners, and assist critical 

Coalition partners in Afghanistan. 

The FY 2012 FMF request includes an increase in assistance for Israel and Pakistan and for the 

first time includes funding for Iraq, which is included in the Overseas Contingency Operations 

section. In addition, the request supports funding for Coalition partners and allies, and is 

consistent with other requirements to promote U.S. national security, fight extremism, and 

secure peace in the Middle East. 

Highlights: 

	 Near East ($4,858.7 million): The majority of FMF funding will provide continued 

assistance to the Near East region, including increased support for Israel in accordance with 

the Memorandum of Understanding; support for Jordan's force modernization, border 

surveillance, and counterterrorism efforts; and programs that consolidate gains in the 

development of counterterrorism capabilities and professional militaries. At the time this 

document went to press, the political situation in the Middle East was fluid and longer-term 

specifics of the program will be reviewed in light of changing circumstances. The United 

States continue to plan for ongoing assistance through FY 2012 in order to be able to 

continue programs that encourage a disciplined, well-training Egyptian military respectful 

of civilian human rights, and provide an incentive for the next government of Lebanon to 

adhere to its international obligations. 

112
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

	 South and Central Asia ($359 million): The FY 2012 request includes $350 million to 

support Pakistan’s security forces by providing equipment and training to enhance their 

counterterrorism and counterinsurgency capabilities. 

	 Western Hemisphere ($85.6 million): In the Western Hemisphere, FMF funding will 

support the Government of Colombia’s efforts to sustain the gains made by its military in 

regaining and maintaining control of its national territory, and will enhance the military’s 

capacity to maintain its forces and operations. Ass istance for Mexico will further 

cooperation between the United States and Mexican militaries, which is critical to U.S. 

homeland defense and counternarcotics efforts. FMF funding will support the Caribbean 

Basin Security Initiative, the multiyear, multifaceted effort by the U.S. Government and 

Caribbean partners to develop a joint regional citizen safety strategy to address the full 

range of security and criminal threats to the Caribbean Basin. 

	 Europe ($123.4 million): In Europe, FMF is focused on supporting Coalition partners, 

both in terms of direct deployment support as well as support to help bolster defense reform 

and modernization efforts during a time of budgetary stress for many European partners. 

FMF also supports defense reform and modernization efforts in other European countries 

not currently Coalition partners in the hopes that such countries will be compatible with 

and able to deploy alongside the United States in the future. 

	 Africa and East Asia and the Pacific ($61 million): In Africa and the East Asia and 

Pacific regions, assistance will support defense reform, enhance counterterrorism 

capabilities, promote interoperability, and expand countries’ capacity to participate in 

peacekeeping operations. 

113
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Global Security Contingency Fund 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

Global Security Contingency Fund - - - 50,000 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117), supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), and includes forward funding 

from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The FY 2012 request of $50 million for the Global Security Contingency Fund is a new three 

year pilot initiative that will streamline the way the U.S. Government provides assistance for 

military forces and other security forces responsible for conducting border and maritime 

security, internal security, and counterterrorism operations, as well as the government agencies 

responsible for such forces. It will also authorize providing assistance to the justice sector 

(including law enforcement and prisons), rule of law programs, and stabilization efforts where 

the Secretary of State decides that civilian providers are challenged to provide such assistance. 

Assistance programs under this fund would be collaboratively developed by the Department of 

State and the Department of Defense, and implemented primarily by these agencies as well as 

the U.S. Agency for International Development, and other appropriate agencies to facilitate the 

provision of assistance. The Fund is intended to address rapidly changing, transnational, 

asymmetric threats, and emergent opportunities strategically where an environment's security, 

political, economic, and social needs warrant such attention. 

114
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Special Defense Acquisition Fund 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

Special Defense Acquisition Fund - - - 100,000 

Foreign Military Sales Trust Fund offset - - - -100,000 

Net Cost for Special Defense Acquisition Fund - - - -

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117), supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), and includes forward funding 

from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The Special Defense Acquisition Fund will expedite the procurement of defense articles for 

provision to foreign nations and international organizations which will help to better support 

coalition and other United States partners participating in U.S. overseas contingency and other 

operations. This represents a re-activation of the International Assistance Program account 

managed by the Department of Defense for advance purchases of defense articles. Once 

activated, this fund operates as a revolving fund which is recapitalized as the advance purchase 

items are sold to partners. Advance purchases will focus initially on high-demand warfighter 

support equipment with long procurement lead times in order to accelerate the United States' 

ability to provide Coalition partners with critical equipment to make them operationally 

effective. Utilizing available mechanism to expedite support for U.S. partners is a high 

priority for both the Department of State and the Department of Defense. 

The FY 2012 request includes $100 million in discretionary budget authority for the SDAF, 

fully offset by a $100 million transfer of Foreign Military Sales Administrative Surcharge Fees 

to re-capitalize SDAF in accordance with the Arms Export Control Act sec. 51(b). 

115
2,255,670

 

 

 

 

 

Multilateral Assistance 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 4/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 4/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

International Organizations and Programs 394,000 390,400 394,000 348,705 

Subtotal, International Organizations 

Programs 394,000 390,400 394,000 348,705 

International Financial Institutions 

International Development Association 1,262,500 1,262,500 1,262,500 1,358,500 

International Bank for Reconstruction and 

Development 

- - - 117,364 

Global Environment Facility 86,500 86,500 86,500 143,750 

African Development Fund 155,000 155,000 155,000 195,000 

African Development Bank - - - 32,418 

Asian Development Fund 105,000 105,000 105,000 115,250 

Asian Development Bank - - - 106,586 

Inter-American Development Bank 204,000 204,000 - 102,018 

Multilateral Investment Fund 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 

Inter-American Investment Corporation 4,670 4,670 4,670 20,429 

European Bank for Reconstruction and 

Development 

- - - -

Global Agriculture and Food Security Program5/ - - - 308,000 

International Fund for Agricultural Development 38,000 38,000 30,000 30,000 

Clean Technology Fund 300,000 300,000 300,000 400,000 

Strategic Climate Fund 75,000 75,000 75,000 190,000 

Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative - - - 174,500 

Subtotal, International Financial Institutions 2,255,670 2,043,670 3,318,815 

Multilateral Assistance 2,649,670 2,646,070 2,437,670 3,667,520 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117), supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), and includes forward funding 

from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

4/ The FY 2010 Enacted and Actual Totals for the International Fund for Agricultural Development includes $204 million, and the 

Inter-American Development Bank includes $8 million of supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 

(P.L. 111-212). 

116
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5/ In FY 2010, the U.S. Agency for International Development transferred $66.6 million in Development Assistance Funds to 

Treasury for payment to the Global Agriculture and Food Security Fund. 

International Organizations and Programs (IO&P) 

The FY 2012 request of $348.7 million for International Organizations and Programs (IO&P) 

will advance U.S. strategic goals by supporting and enhancing international consultation and 

coordination. This voluntary contribution approach is required to accomplish transnational 

goals where solutions to problems can best be addressed globally, such as protecting the ozone 

layer or safeguarding international air traffic. In other areas, such as development programs, 

the United States can multiply the influence and effectiveness of its own assistance through 

support for international programs. 

Highlights: 

	 United Nations Children’s Fund ($126.6 million): U.S. voluntary contributions support 

the core budget of the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), which provides core 

administrative funding, goods, and services directly to the world’s neediest children, and 

contributes to the development of local institutional capacity. UNICEF’s development 

work is closely coordinated with U.S. Government and international development 

agencies. 

	 United Nations Development Program ($71.5 million): U.S. voluntary contributions 

are provided for the United Nations Development Program (UNDP)’s regular budget, 

which supports its core administrative functions, development goals, and specific trust 

funds targeted in the areas of democratic governance and crisis prevention and recovery. 

	 United Nations Population Fund ($47.5 million): The United States continues to 

support the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). C ontributions to UNFPA will 

bolster the Fund’s continued efforts to reduce poverty, improve the health of women and 

children, prevent HIV/AIDS, and provide family planning assistance to women in over 150 

countries. 

	 UN Women ($8 million): With the creation in July 2010 of UN Women, the many issues 

of direct consequence to women and girls - including increasing women’s political 

participation, expanding women’s economic and educational opportunities, reducing 

violence against women, improving women’s health, protecting the rights of indigenous 

women and women with disabilities, facilitating women’s political participation in all 

aspects of peace and security, and countering discrimination against women - will 

henceforth be handled by one agency. This contribution to the core resources of UN 

Women (which includes the former UNIFEM) will strengthen and streamline the UN’s 

efforts and will allow policies and programs related to women to be formulated and 

implemented more efficiently. 

	 Multilateral Action Initiative ($2 million): This new Initiative will allow for timely 

funding of voluntary contributions to specific multilateral activities in order to address 

priority and emerging needs that were not specifically known at the time of the Budget 

submission. The purposes of this Initiative are to fund responses to peace and security 

challenges, spur innovation from multilateral organizations through timely seed money, 

respond to unanticipated crises, and contribute to the United Nations Junior Professional 

Officer program, which will allow the United States to seize opportunities to place young 

Americans in United Nations organizations. 

117
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

International Financial Institutions 

International Financial Institutions (IFIs) provide loans, grants, and investments to developing 

and transitioning economies to promote growth and poverty reduction through their support of 

public and private projects, programs, and policy reforms. They also coordinate development 

programs with developing country governments as well as other donors, and provide 

professional advice and technical support designed to address impediments to economic 

growth. The Department of the Treasury’s FY 2012 request reflects an extraordinary and 

unprecedented confluence of financing needs for the Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs), 

stemming from their aggressive and proactive response to the global financial crisis, as well as 

the urgent imperative to address critical global challenges such as climate change and food 

security. 

The FY 2012 request for the IFIs of $3,318.8 million includes funding for two new 

replenishments to the International Development Association and the African Development 

Fund, and General Capital Increases (GCIs) to the MDBs which faced capital depletions after 

their aggressive and necessary response to the global financial crisis, which has been 

recognized as one of the most effective development interventions in generations. With more 

than $222 billion mobilized around the world by the MDBs, millions of the poorest people were 

protected from the worst impacts of the crisis and economies of vital importance for U.S. 

exports have performed better than they would have absent this support. As a leading 

shareholder, the United States has agreed with the other MDB shareholders that restoring the 

capital shortfalls resulting from the MDB crisis response is critical if we wish to avoid a 

dramatic and rapid decline in the availability of MDB funding. These capital increase requests 

are the first since the 1990s and, stemming from the extraordinary nature of the global financial 

crisis, the only time that we have faced a simultaneous request by all the MDBs. 

The budget also includes $590 million for the Climate Investment Funds, comprised of the 

Clean Technology Fund and the Strategic Climate Fund, which help combat global climate 

change, help the most vulnerable countries prepare for and respond to its impacts, and 

demonstrate the United States’ commitment to leadership in forging a global solution to the 

climate crisis. The budget also provides $308 million for the Global Agriculture and Food 

Security Program (GAFSP), a multi-donor facility administered by the World Bank that 

provides financial assistance to poor countries that make policy and financial commitments to 

address their internal food security needs. 

	 International Development Association (IDA). The FY 2012 request includes 

$1,358.5 million for the first of three installments to the sixteenth replenishment of 

IDA (IDA16). IDA is a facility within the World Bank Group that makes grants and 

highly concessional or “soft” loans to the world’s 79 poorest countries, and is the 

centerpiece of U.S. multilateral development assistance. IDA is the single largest 

source of development finance globally across a range of sectors, addressing primary 

education, basic health services, clean water and sanitation, environmental safeguards, 

business climate improvements, infrastructure and institutional reforms. The United 

States was the driving force behind the creation of IDA in 1960 and remains its largest 

shareholder. U.S. funding for IDA has helped eradicate extreme hunger and poverty 

around the world, while also providing the United States with an opportunity to pursue 

initiatives that advance our priorities. The World Bank helped create Afghanistan’s 

Microfinance Investment and Support Facility to establish a healthy microfinance 

sector. By 2009 more than one million loans-worth $632 million-had been disbursed, 

with a 94 percent repayment record. Additionally, in Haiti 210,000 children are 

currently receiving daily meals through IDA support. 

118
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

	 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD). The FY 2012 

request includes $117.4 million for the first of five installments of the United States 

capital subscription to the IBRD GCI. IBRD is a facility within the World Bank 

Group that makes non-concessional or “hard” loans to primarily middle-income 

countries and as well as some creditworthy low-income countries. The IBRD focuses 

on supporting poverty reduction, economic development and global public goods, 

including climate change and food security. The Bank plans to continue strong 

increases in lending to support renewable energy and energy efficiency projects as well 

as agriculture and food production. The Bank also serves as the premier center for 

research and knowledge on development, helping to promote lessons learned and to 

identify innovations that can even more significantly leverage the Bank’s resources to 

combat poverty. As the Bank’s leading shareholder for more than 65 years, the United 

States has helped shape the global development agenda, advancing maternal and child 

health, education, good governance, private sector growth and civil society. As a 

result, the IBRD has been a key partner for the United States on the ground in many 

countries. In Pakistan the IBRD’s loan program of $3.9 billion from 2005 through 

2010 has supported important programs to aid recovery from the 2005 earthquake, 

provided micro credits to more than 275,000 borrowers, installed water systems for 

more than 9,000 families in Baluchistan, increased school enrollments, particularly 

among girls, and improved sanitation systems for 80 rural communities in Northern 

Pakistan. In Indonesia provincial health projects helped increase the proportion of birth 

deliveries by trained health workers from 37 percent in 1995 to 72 percent in 2007. 

	 Global Environment Facility (GEF). The FY 2012 request includes $143.8 million 

for the second of four installments to the GEF, a multilateral fund that provides 

incremental finance-mostly grants-for projects that improve the global environment, 

such as reducing greenhouse gas pollution and conserving biodiversity. The GEF 

supports capacity building and innovative and cost-effective investments whose design 

and environmental benefits can be duplicated (and financed) elsewhere. Projects fall 

into seven categories with the following historical allocations: biodiversity 

conservation, reducing or avoiding GHG emissions, protection of international waters, 

combating desertification and deforestation, reducing persistent organic pollutants, and 

phasing out ozone-depleting chemicals. The Fifth GEF Replenishment was 

concluded in May, 2010 with a record 52 percent increase in new donor funding. 

Each dollar pledged by the United States was matched by five dollars from other 

donors, for a total of $3.5 billion in new donor resources, and $4.25 billion in available 

resources, over the FY2011 to FY2014 period. GEF has achieved significant results 

across the globe. Since 1991, Egypt has reduced its carbon dioxide emissions by 16.8 

million tons as a result of GEF support of the country’s Energy Efficiency 

Improvement and Greenhouse Gas Reductions Project. 

	 African Development Fund (AfDF). The FY 2012 request includes $195.0 million 

for the first of three installments to the twelfth replenishment of the AfDf (AfDF-12). 

The African Development Fund is a facility within the African Development Bank 

Group that works with the 40 poorest countries in Africa, offering grants and highly 

concessional or “soft” loans. The AfDF has a strong strategic focus on infrastructure, 

economic governance, and regional integration. The AfDF is particularly active in the 

infrastructure sector, a key challenge to economic growth on the continent. As the 

U.S. is the largest shareholder, AfDF is responding to U.S. development priorities such 

as infrastructure work through an increasing emphasis on rural infrastructure to meet 

food security needs, such as building roads to markets, storage facilities, enhancing 

water management and irrigation systems, and investments in clean energy, such as 

wind, hydro and solar power. Additionally, U.S. support for the Fund further supports 

AfDF’s Fragile States Facility, which helps meet the extraordinary infrastructure and 

119
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

governance needs of countries emerging from conflict, such as Liberia. This 

assistance helps reduce the risk that fragile states slip back into conflict, which would 

create much larger long-run costs to the U.S. in terms of humanitarian needs and 

security vacuums. The AfDF has had significant impact in the region. For example, 

the AfDF provided $170 million in support to regional power sectors, providing over 

16 million people with a new electricity connection; and in Sierra Leone the 

rehabilitation of hydroelectric power generation cut power costs by 60 percent and 

provided 8,000 customers with new access. 

	 African Development Bank (AfDB). The FY 2012 request includes $32.4 million for 

the first of eight installments for the AfDB’s sixth GCI. The African Development 

Bank is the non-concessional or “hard” window that makes public sector loans to the 

15 middle-income countries in Africa, and private sector loans to both middle- and 

low-income countries. The United States has been a shareholder in the AfDB since 

1983, and has been a strong supporter of the AfDB’s rapidly growing private sector 

lending portfolio as it is an important complement to public-sector investments that can 

improve the regional business climate. Through its support to Africa’s 

middle-income countries, the AfDB is helping to create a new generation of markets 

for U.S. businesses and workers, enhancing the region’s capacity to grow without 

reliance on donor aid. With U.S. engagement and leadership, the AfDB is building 

capacity in climate resilience and low-carbon development projects. For example, the 

Bank recently integrated tree planting into its road building projects, and is 

increasingly focused on developing renewable energy projects such as the Lake 

Turkana Wind Farm project in Kenya. Other recent results include the $415.6 million 

Africa Food Crisis Response that benefitted 2.1 million people in 28 African countries 

(34 percent of which were women) and the Sidi Bel Abbes Drinking Water Supply 

Project which has supported Algeria’s efforts to improve the integrated management of 

water resources, and access by communities to clean, reliable drinking water supplies, 

benefitting 600,000 people in Sidi Bel Abbes City alone. 

	 Asian Development Fund (AsDF). The FY 2012 request includes $115.3 million for 

the third installment of a four-year commitment under the agreement of the ninth 

replenishment of the Asian Development Fund. As the Asian Development Bank’s 

“soft” or concessional window, the AsDF is a critical provider of donor resources to 

some of the poorest countries in Asia. These resources finance policy support and 

policy reform, production capacity, human development, environmentally sustainable 

investments, good governance and capacity building for development management, 

and regional cooperation. Additionally, the AsDF places an emphasis on infrastructure 

finance, and the U.S. has been immensely successful in directing the AsDF’s resources 

towards U.S. priority countries, including Afghanistan and Pakistan. U.S. 

investments have further supported critical projects with major results in the region, 

including Afghanistan’s Hairatan-Mazar-e-Sharif Railway and investment in the 

Pakistan Energy Sector. As a result of AsDB’s investments in Afghanistan’s energy 

sector, at least 65 percent of urban households and 25 percent of rural households were 

expected to gain access to power by the end of 2010. The expansion of electrical 

capacity in combination with other AsDB investments in irrigation capacity is expected 

to lead to an annual increase in agricultural output of 6 percent per year and in 

agricultural exports of 9 percent per year through 2015. 

	 Asian Development Bank (AsDB). The FY 2012 request includes $106.6 million for 

the second of five capital contributions for the fifth General Capital Increase. The 

Asian Development Bank is the “hard” or non-concessional window that makes loans 

to middle-income countries and creditworthy low income countries in Asia. The 

United States has been a leading shareholder of the Asian Development Bank since it 

120
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

was established in 1966. The AsDB’s comparative advantage is infrastructure finance 

in such core sectors as energy, transport, and water - typically these sectors will 

comprise 80 percent or more of AsDB operations in a given year. By the AsDB’s own 

measure, operations supporting infrastructure perform best in terms of achieving 

output targets. In addition, the AsDB incorporates environment, capacity development, 

good governance, and private sector development in project design. An AsDF-funded 

education sector reform in Tajikistan had a dramatic impact, particularly on girls’ 

enrollment rates in five pilot districts, which rose by 51 percent, much higher than the 

targeted 10-25 percent. 

	 Inter-American Development Bank (IDB). The FY2012 request includes $102.0 

million for the first of five installments for the IDB’s ninth GCI. The Inter-American 

Development Bank makes “hard” or non-concessional loans to middle-income 

governments, some creditworthy low-income countries, and private sector firms in 

Latin America and the Caribbean. Established in 1959, the IDB is the largest source 

of development financing in the region, providing 26 borrowing member countries 

close to 50 percent of their multilateral financing. For over 50 years, the United States 

has been the leading shareholder of the IDB, exercising strong influence over the 

Bank’s policies and programs to ensure that the investments made by the American 

people in partnership with the other members of the Bank are financially sound, and 

advance the economic and social development of Latin America and the Caribbean. 

The IDB’s response to the Haitian earthquake is a strong case in point. Following the 

devastating earthquake, the United States facilitated a landmark agreement ensuring 

that $2 billion in total is available for Haiti through 2020, and that the funds will be 

distributed under strong standards of accountability and with an eye to maximum 

effectiveness. IDB financed projects have also achieved the following results in the 

region: 1.5 million households with new or upgraded water supply, 3.2 million students 

benefitted by education projects and 175,000 teachers trained, 13,600 miles of 

inter-urban roads built, maintained, or upgraded, 220,000 micro, small, and medium 

enterprises financed and 680,000 households with new or upgraded sanitary 

connections. 

	 Multilateral Investment Fund (MIF). The FY 2012 request includes $25.0 million 

for the sixth installment payment of the first replenishment of the MIF. The MIF is a 

facility within the IDB Group, focusing on private sector development in the Western 

Hemisphere. The MIF promotes micro and small enterprise growth in Latin America 

and works directly with private sector and public sector partners to strengthen the 

environment for business, build the capabilities and skills of the workforce and broaden 

the economic participation of smaller enterprises. The United States was the primary 

force behind the creation of the MIF and its focus has been on areas prioritized by the 

United States from its beginning in 1993. Continued U.S. leadership at the IDB has 

allowed the United States to work with the MIF to build and enhance important 

regional partnerships to strengthen economic and private sector development. In 

response to the crisis in Haiti, the MIF immediately established a $3 million credit line 

to help past and present MIF partners in Haiti get up and running. Additionally, the 

Business Development Program for the Software Industry in Uruguay played an 

important role in supporting the development of small and medium enterprises. The 

program substantially improved financial management processes, marketing strategies, 

and quality and cost control. As a result, these firms experienced sustained increases 

in sales (137 percent), exports (270 percent), and employment (142 percent). 

	 Inter-American Investment Corporation (IIC). The FY 2012 request includes $20.4 

million to clear remaining U.S. arrears to the Inter-American Investment Corporation. 

The IIC, a facility of the IDB Group was established to promote private small and 

121
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Latin America and the Caribbean by offering a 

combination of direct loans and equity investments in individual companies, lending 

through private local banks, and participation in regional equity funds. The United 

States played the lead role in the creation of the IIC in 1984 because of our 

long-standing commitment to fostering economic growth, especially through the 

primacy of open markets and private sector-led growth. The IIC’s mission is closely 

aligned these priorities and has had significant impacts in Latin America and the 

Caribbean. The IIC supports key objectives of the Administration, especially the 

promotion of private small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). 

	 The Global Agriculture and Food Security Program (GAFSP). The FY 2012 

request includes $308.0 million for the Global Agriculture and Food Security Program. 

As part of the Administration’s food security initiative, the U.S. Department of the 

Treasury has worked with our partners in the G-8 and G-20 to establish the GAFSP. 

GAFSP is a multilateral fund to increase investments in agriculture and food security in 

poor countries by leveraging U.S. resources. This fund, launched on April 22, 2010 

by Secretary Geithner, provides an opportunity to forge a global response among G20 

members and non-G20 countries, as well as private sector and civil society 

organizations. As Chair of the Steering Committee - the main decision making body 

of the Fund - and one of the contributors - the United States holds a strong decision 

making position within the Fund. In Haiti our investments are training 100,000 small 

farmers on improving animal and plant health. In Rwanda our investments are 

strengthening irrigation systems to increase agricultural productivity of 30,000 hectare 

of hillside land in eight watershed sites. In Ethiopia the Fund is financing the 

construction of rural roads to increase market access for small farmers. 

	 International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). The FY 2012 request 

includes $30.0 million for the third of three payments to the eighth replenishment of the 

International Fund for Agricultural Development. IFAD, a specialized facility of the 

United Nations, is the only multilateral development institution focused exclusively on 

reducing poverty and improving food security in the rural areas of developing 

countries. T hrough low-interest loans and grants IFAD develops and finances 

projects that help smallholder farmers increase agricultural productivity and incomes, 

improve nutritional levels, and access larger markets. IFAD’s mandate is critically 

important in the fight against poverty, as about 70 percent of the world’s 1.4 billion 

poorest people (defined as those subsisting on less than $1.25 a day) live in rural areas, 

mainly as small-scale producers and subsistence farmers. Forty percent of IFAD’s 

funding supports agricultural development in the poorest countries in sub-Saharan 

Africa. IFAD has also achieved substantial results on other continents as well. An 

IFAD funded project in Western Mindanao in the Philippines helped former 

combatants return to civilian life after decades of conflict. The $750,000 grant 

targeted households of former combatants to help them with access to land and become 

productive farmers and fisherfolk. The project benefitted 3,860 people in the area, 

increasing beneficiaries’ incomes by as much as 60 percent. 

	 Clean Technology Fund (CTF). The FY 2012 request includes $400.0 million for 

the CTF. The CTF is one of two multilateral Climate Investment Funds. The United 

States, alongside the United Kingdom and Japan, led international efforts in 2008 to 

develop and launch the CTF, and strong and consistent U.S. leadership over the past 

two years has helped the CTF become the largest source of international funding for 

climate finance. The CTF aims to reduce global emissions growth and combat climate 

change by helping to close the price gap in developing countries between commercially 

available clean technologies and dirtier conventional alternatives in the power sector, 

the transport sector, and in energy efficiency. The CTF focuses on spurring 

122
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

large-scale clean energy investments in middle income developing countries with 

rapidly growing levels of greenhouse gas pollution. 

	 Strategic Climate Fund (SCF). The FY 2012 request includes $190.0 million for the 

SCF. The SCF, the other facility of the multilateral Climate Investment Funds (CIF), 

supports three targeted programs to pilot new approaches and scaled-up activities to 

address climate change challenges in developing countries, while promoting 

low-carbon, climate resilient economic growth. The Pilot Program for Climate 

Resilience (PPRC) helps many of the poorest and most vulnerable countries prepare for 

and respond to the unavoidable effects of climate change by integrating climate 

adaptation into their core development planning. The Forest Investment Program 

(FIP) is working to reduce deforestation in developing countries through improved 

forest management and by addressing the drivers of deforestation. FIP is helping to 

develop and implement inter alia systems for forest monitoring and inventory, land 

tenure reform and forest law enforcement. The Program for Scaling-Up Renewable 

Energy in Low Income Countries (SREP) is supporting a select number of the poorest 

countries in their efforts to expand energy access and stimulate economic growth 

through the scaled-up deployment of renewable energy solutions. 

	 Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative (MDRI). The FY 2012 request includes $91.0 

million for the remaining U.S. commitment to MDRI under IDA15 and $83.5 million 

for the first of three payments to cover the U.S. commitment to MDRI in the IDA16 

and AfDF12 periods. Building upon the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) 

Initiative, the Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative (MDRI) provides 100 percent 

cancellation of remaining eligible debts owed to the World Bank’s IDA, the AfDF, and 

the International Monetary Fund for countries that complete the HIPC initiative. 

MDRI is expected to provide over $53 billion in additional debt relief beyond HIPC to 

42 countries. IDA is expected to provide the greatest level of debt relief at over $36 

billion (nearly 70 percent of the total), while ADF is expected to provide nearly $9 

billion. 

123
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Export-Import Bank of the United States 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

Export-Import Bank of the United States 2,380 2,380 2,500 -212,900 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117), supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), and includes forward funding 

from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The FY 2012 request for the Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank) of $4 

million supports the expenses of the Inspector General. The FY 2012 budget estimates that the 

Ex-Im Bank’s export credit support will total $32.0 billion in lending activity, and will be 

funded entirely by receipts collected from the Ex-Im Bank’s customers. These receipts are 

expected to total $467.9 million in excess of estimated losses in FY 2012. These funds, treated 

as offsetting collections, will be used to pay the $76.4 million in costs for loan programs, 

$124.6 million for administrative expenses, and $50.0 million in estimated carryover expenses. 

The administrative expenses estimate includes funding to meet the increased demand for 

services; for significant improvements to outreach and business development initiatives to 

increase the number of small business that export; and to upgrade the Bank’s antiquated 

systems infrastructure. The Bank forecasts a net return of $212.9 million to the U.S. Treasury 

as receipts in excess of expenses or negative subsidy. 

The Ex-Im Bank is an independent, self-sustaining executive agency, and a wholly-owned U.S. 

Government corporation. As the official export credit agency of the United States, the mission 

of the Ex-Im Bank is to support U.S. exports by providing export financing through its loan, 

guarantee, and insurance programs. These programs are implemented in cases where the 

private sector is unable or unwilling to provide financing, and to ensure equitable competition 

in export sales between U.S. exporters and foreign exporters financed by their respective 

governments. By facilitating the financing of U.S. exports, Ex-Im Bank helps companies 

create and maintain U.S. jobs. The Ex-Im Bank actively assists small and medium sized 

businesses. 

124
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Overseas Private Investment Corporation 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

Overseas Private Investment Corporation -202,700 -202,700 -217,590 -188,110 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117), supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), and includes forward funding 

from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC) FY 2012 budget is fully self-funded and 

continues OPIC’s positive contribution to the budget. From its estimated net offsetting 

collections of $277 million in FY 2012, OPIC is requesting $57.9 million for administrative 

expenses and $31 million for credit funding. The budget also proposes $4 million in transfers 

of credit funding from the State Department to OPIC. These resources will support up to $3.1 

billion in new direct loans and loan guarantees. 

OPIC is a self-sustaining agency that mobilizes American private investment by providing 

political risk insurance and financing in support of U.S. private investment and U.S. foreign 

policy. OPIC is open in 158 developing nations and emerging markets around the world. 

OPIC is the primary U.S. Government agency shaping overseas investment to promote 

economic growth in a way that respects labor, human rights, and the environment. Through 

OPIC’s loans, guarantees, insurance, and investment funds, OPIC catalyzes economic growth 

and investment far beyond its small budget. 

Private sector investment support provided by OPIC is market-driven, and as a result it 

efficiently aligns limited U.S. Government resources with projects that are most likely to drive 

economic growth. OPIC is an effective and efficient way to promote private sector growth 

and the self sustaining development that it supports. 

125
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trade and Development Agency 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

Trade and Development Agency 55,200 55,200 55,200 56,270 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117), supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), and includes forward funding 

from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The FY 2012 request for the U.S. Trade and Development Agency (USTDA) of $56.3 million 

will enable it to continue its mission to help U.S. companies create jobs through the export of 

goods and services for priority development projects in emerging economies. USTDA links 

U.S. businesses to export opportunities by funding project planning activities, pilot projects, 

and reverse trade missions while creating sustainable infrastructure and economic growth in 

partner countries. 

USTDA’s FY 2012 budget request will support key U.S. foreign policy objectives, such as 

promoting clean energy development, broadening economic engagement with 

Muslim-majority countries, supporting the Presidential Policy Directive on Global 

Development, and advancing the Millennium Development Goals in Africa. USTDA will also 

prioritize support for projects in emerging economies where its assistance can be most 

impactful for U.S. companies and partner countries. Some of these markets include; China, 

India, Brazil, Colombia, Ghana, Indonesia, Mexico, Philippines, South Africa, Turkey and 

Vietnam. 

USTDA has a demonstrated capability to respond rapidly and effectively to U.S. foreign policy 

priorities and to promote economic development overseas, while creating export opportunities 

for U.S. companies. USTDA’s strategic use of foreign assistance funds to support sound 

investment decisions in host countries creates an enabling environment for sustainable 

economic development. Specifically, USTDA’s programs help to identify and prepare 

projects for implementation that will establish the infrastructure necessary for economic 

growth. 

In carrying out its mission, USTDA places particular emphasis on activities where there is a 

high likelihood for the export of U.S.-manufactured goods and services during project 

implementation. As such, USTDA supports jobs in the United States by providing immediate 

opportunities for U.S. businesses, particularly small businesses, and supporting longer term 

employment and export opportunities for the U.S. manufacturing, research and development, 

and services sectors. The Agency uses various tools to facilitate U.S. business opportunities in 

the international marketplace, including feasibility studies, technical assistance, reverse trade 

missions, training grants, and conferences. 

USTDA programs have a proven record of success. In FY 2010, USTDA identified over $2 

billion in exports that were attributable to its activities. USTDA’s export measure grew to 

over $47 in U.S. exports for every program dollar spent by the Agency. 

126
 

 

 

 

 

International Trade Commission 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

International Trade Commission 81,860 81,860 81,860 87,000 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117), supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), and includes forward funding 

from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The International Trade Commission (ITC) is an independent, nonpartisan, Federal agency 

with a wide range of trade-related mandates. The ITC makes determinations with respect to 

unfair trade practices in import trade, as well as conducting import-injury investigations. It 

also conducts economic research and fact-finding investigations of trade issues, and provides 

technical information and advice on trade matters to the Congress and the Administration. 

The FY 2012 request of $87 million will fund activities related to these mandates. 

127
 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign Claims Settlement Commission 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

Foreign Claims Settlement Commission 2,117 2,117 2,117 2,100 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117), supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), and includes forward funding 

from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The Foreign Claims Settlement Commission adjudicates the claims of American nationals 

(individuals and corporations) arising out of the nationalization, expropriation, or other taking 

of their property by foreign governments - and, in some cases, claims for personal injury and 

death - pursuant to the International Claims Settlement Act of 1949 and other statutes. 

The FY 2012 request of $2.1 million will enable the Commission to continue this function, 

while also providing technical assistance to the Departments of State and the Treasury, other 

Federal agencies, and the public in connection with international and war claims programs. 

128
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Food for Peace Title II 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

Adjusted Food for Peace Title II 1,690,000 1,690,000 1,690,000 

Non-War Supplemental 150,000 150,000 -

Food for Peace Title II 1,840,000 1,840,000 1,690,000 1,690,000 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117), supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), and includes forward funding 

from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

Title II of the Food for Peace Act (P.L. 83-480, as amended, formerly the Agricultural Trade 

Development and Assistance Act of 1954) authorizes the provision of U.S. food assistance in 

response to emergencies and disasters around the world, and funds non-emergency, 

development-oriented resources to help address the underlying causes of food insecurity. 

Food for Peace Title II funding is appropriated to the U.S. Department of Agriculture and is 

administered by the U.S. Agency for International Development. 

This request includes $450 million to meet the legislatively-mandated tonnage for 

non-emergency programs. 

129
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

McGovern-Dole International Food for Education 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

McGovern-Dole International Food for 

Education 

209,500 209,500 209,500 200,500 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117), supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), and includes forward funding 

from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The FY 2012 request for the McGovern-Dole International Food for Education and Child 

Nutrition Program Grants is $209.5 million. The Department of Agriculture (USDA) 

administers this program. With these funds USDA will provide the donation of U.S. 

agricultural commodities and associated technical and financial assistance to carry out 

pre-school and primary-school feeding programs in foreign countries in order to improve food 

security, reduce the incidence of hunger and malnutrition, and improve literacy and primary 

education. The program also supports maternal, infant, and child nutrition programs for 

pregnant women, nursing mothers, infants and children. 

130
FY 2012 INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS 

OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY 

OPERATIONS 

(OCO) 

131
OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS (OCO)

STATE OPERATIONS and FOREIGN ASSISTANCE REQUEST

($000) 

FY 2010 Enacted1 FY 2010 Actual Total2 FY 2011 CR3 FY 2012 President's Request 

2

OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS (OCO) TOTAL -STATE OPERATIONS and FOREIGN ASSISTANCE 5,084,922 4,665,468 1,760,454 8,702,787 

STATE OPERATIONS - OCO 3,040,489 2,621,035 1,760,454 4,386,187 

Administration of Foreign Affairs 3,040,489 2,621,035 1,760,454 4,386,187  State Programs 2,987,489 2,575,035 1,714,454 4,323,255  Diplomatic and Consular Programs 2,987,489 2,575,035 1,714,454 4,323,255 

 Ongoing Operations 

2,801,263 2,388,809 1,530,266 4,076,401 

 Worldwide Security Protection 

186,226 186,226 184,188 246,854 

-

Other Administration of Foreign Affairs 53,000 46,000 46,000 62,932 

 Office of the Inspector General 53,000 46,000 46,000 62,932 

FOREIGN OPERATIONS - OCO4 2,044,433 2,044,433 - 4,316,600 

Bilateral Economic Assistance - OCO 1,342,433 1,342,433 - 1,216,600 

 Economic Support Fund (ESF) 1,342,433 1,342,433 - 1,216,600 

International Security Assistance - OCO 702,000 702,000 - 3,100,000 

 International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement (INCLE) 702,000 702,000 - 1,000,000 

 Foreign Military Financing (FMF) - - - 1,000,000 

 Pakistan Counterinsurgency Capability Fund (PCCF) - - - 1,100,000 

Footnotes 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total includes the allocations as of March 30, 2010, from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117), forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32) and supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). $1.8 billion in forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32) was designated for FY 2010 and is included in the FY 2010 Enacted level. This forward funding includes D&CP Ongoing Operation: $361 million; D&CP WSP: $13.38 million; ESCM: $90.9 million; GHCS: $50 million; INCLE: $94 million; FMF: $1,225.5 million. 2/ FY 2010 Actual Total includes the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117), supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), and excludes forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32). 3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 4/ Foreign Assistance levels have not yet been allocated at the program/country level under the annualized FY 2011 CR (P.L. 111-322). 

132
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Overseas Contingency Operations Overview 

The Administration’s FY 2012 International Affairs budget request includes $8.7 billion for 

Overseas Contingency Operations to fund the extraordinary and temporary costs for operations 

and assistance in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan for the Department of State and U.S. Agency 

for International Development (USAID). This is the first year State and USAID are 

requesting funds under the Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) method used by the 

Department of Defense (DoD) to identify funding requirements for the exceptional costs 

incurred in these three countries. The FY 2012 OCO request is meant to provide a transparent, 

whole-of-government approach to these operations and better align the military and civilian 

costs. The FY 2012 request clearly separates OCO costs, which will be phased out over time, 

from permanent base budget requirements in the frontline states and elsewhere. 

The FY 2012 request reflects the significant and extraordinary resource demands placed on the 

Department due to the ongoing transition from a military-led to civilian-led mission in Iraq, the 

early stages of a similar shift in Afghanistan, and the increase in U.S. government civilian 

responsibilities in Pakistan. The Department of State and USAID FY 2012 OCO request 

represents a $3.6 billion increase from the FY 2010 estimate of similar costs. That increase is 

more than offset by the projected reduction in Department of Defense OCO costs, which fall 

$45 billion from FY 2010. This underscores the government-wide reduction in resource 

requirements for the frontline states as these transitions occur. 

In Iraq, the OCO request will support the U.S. mission of fostering a sovereign, stable, and 

self-reliant Iraq and the extraordinary costs from the increased Department responsibilities as 

the military presence decreases. The Department will operate the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad, 

consulates general in Basrah and Erbil, and Embassy Branch Offices in Mosul and Kirkuk. 

OCO funds will also support increased diplomatic security as well as continued oversight of 

U.S.-funded assistance programs and operations through the Special Inspector General for Iraq 

Reconstruction. The request likewise will support a new civilian-led Police Development and 

Criminal Justice Program building on the current DoD effort--this program will develop 

capable Ministry of Interior and civilian police institutions in Iraq and provide support for the 

judiciary and corrections systems, including funding the Department of Justice presence. It 

also will fund military assistance to close gaps in the Iraq Security Force’s minimum essential 

capabilities; support the development of enduring logistics capabilities and institutions; and 

strengthen our long term strategic partnership with Iraq. 

In Afghanistan, OCO funding will support efforts to build the capacity of the Afghan 

government and institutions to counter insurgents and foster transparency and accountability. 

It will support the continued deployment of civilian experts from the Department of State, 

USAID, and other U.S. government agencies in Kabul and the provinces. 

OCO funds will also support short-term economic assistance programs in Afghanistan with a 

direct impact on counterinsurgency and stabilization efforts, such as cash-for-work and 

USAID's sub-national governance and alternative development programs. It will also enhance 

oversight of U.S-funded assistance programs and operations, through the Office of the Special 

Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction. 

In Pakistan, OCO funds will support the civilian and diplomatic security presence and shift 

funding for the Pakistan Counterinsurgency Capability Fund (PCCF) from the Department of 

Defense to the Department of State. The PCCF program equips, trains, and supports Pakistani 

forces engaged in eliminating insurgent sanctuaries that threaten the stability of the government 

in Pakistan, security in Afghanistan, and present a danger to the region and the United States. 

133
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diplomatic and Consular Programs - OCO 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

Ongoing Operations 2,801,263 2,388,809 1,530,266 4,076,401 

Worldwide Security Protection 186,226 186,226 184,188 246,854 

Diplomatic and Consular Programs - OCO 2,987,489 2,575,035 1,714,454 4,323,255 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117), supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), and includes forward funding 

from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) request for Diplomatic and Consular Programs 

(D&CP) totals $4.323 billion. The OCO funding addresses the extraordinary and temporary 

costs of diplomatic operations in the frontline states of Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan. This 

funding is critical to achieving U.S. national security goals of the highest priority: establishing 

a stable, democratic Iraq that will change the strategic landscape of the Middle East and 

defeating al-Qaida in Afghanistan and Pakistan and eliminating its safe havens. 

D&CP - Ongoing Operations 

In Iraq, OCO funding of $3.229 billion in D&CP - Ongoing Operations meets requirements for 

deploying, securing, and supplying the Department’s civilian presence in an extremely 

high-threat environment. As U.S. troops leave Iraq after eight years, the Department will 

assume responsibility for over 400 essential activities currently performed by DOD, ranging 

from providing airlift to protecting civilian personnel. The Department will also have primary 

responsibility for helping the still fragile state develop democratic institutions and build a stable 

economy. Broadening and deepening engagement with Iraq in the context of the U.S. 

military-civilian transition will require major personnel and resource commitments for 

expanded operations. The Department plans to operate the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad, 

consulates in Basrah and Erbil, and embassy branch offices in Mosul and Kirkuk, with 

supporting aviation facilities in Basrah, Erbil, and Baghdad. In addition to security costs for 

these operations, the Department will continue to absorb all logistics, life support, and 

International Cooperative Administrative Support Services costs for U.S. Government agencies 

with a minimal presence in Baghdad. 

In Afghanistan, OCO funding of $758 million in Ongoing Operations meets requirements for 

deploying and supplying an increased civilian presence. To consolidate the military gains 

made in defeating al-Qaida and other extremists, civilians will work to build a more 

accountable and effective Afghan government that serves its people, generates economic 

opportunities, and functions with limited international support. Civilians will serve with U.S. 

military troops in field locations and provide expertise necessary for reconstruction and 

development as part of the joint military-civilian strategy. 

In Pakistan, OCO funding of $89 million in Ongoing Operations addresses the costs associated 

with enhanced bilateral engagement and a greater civilian presence. The Department will help 

Pakistan lay the foundations for long-term economic stability and sustainable growth. 

Civilians will also work with Pakistanis to develop their security capabilities and convince 

134
 

 

 

 

 

 

them to systematically confront extremist threats. Funding will support improved 

coordination and oversight of assistance programs, new communication efforts, strengthened 

people-to-people ties, and a safe operational platform for U.S. civilian agencies. 

D&CP - Worldwide Security Protection 

In Afghanistan, OCO funding of $190 million in D&CP - Worldwide Security Protection 

addresses the increasing security needs of an expanding mission in a war environment. The 

funding will support a responsible security transition, including transition to the Worldwide 

Protective Services (WPS) contract awarded in September 2010, the opening of two new 

consulates in Herat and Mazar-e-Sharif, and the construction of three tactical operations centers 

at the embassy and consulates. 

In Pakistan, OCO funding of $57 million in Worldwide Security Protection likewise provides 

for overseas protective operations, including Quick Reaction Forces comprised of specially 

trained Pakistani personnel and funded through the new WPS contract. 

135
 

 

 

 

 

Office of Inspector General - OCO 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

Office of Inspector General - OCO 53,000 46,000 46,000 62,932 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117), supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), and includes forward funding 

from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The OCO request for the Office of Inspector General appropriation totals $63 million. This 

funding includes $44.4 million for the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan 

Reconstruction (SIGAR), enabling SIGAR to keep pace with the expanding U.S. 

reconstruction effort in Afghanistan. 

The funding also includes $18.5 million the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction 

(SIGIR), reflecting a reduction in the scope of SIGIR’s program consistent with the anticipated 

winding down and termination of its activities. 

SIGAR and SIGIR provide oversight of programs and operations funded with amounts 

appropriated or otherwise made available for the reconstruction of Afghanistan or Iraq, 

respectively. SIGAR and SIGIR report directly to, and are under the supervision of, the 

Secretaries of State and Defense. 

136
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Economic Support Fund - OCO 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

Economic Support Fund - OCO 1,342,433 1,342,433 - 1,216,600 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117), supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), and includes forward funding 

from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The FY 2012 Economic Support Fund (ESF) request includes funding for Overseas 

Contingency Operations (OCO) for Afghanistan. ESF OCO funds for Afghanistan will 

support economic assistance programs that will have a direct counterinsurgency effect. 

The requested $1,216.6 million will fund a combination of programs, across multiple sectors 

that support the counterinsurgency strategy by promoting interventions that will strengthen 

national and sub-national governance, provide needed services and job opportunities to 

citizens, while also laying the groundwork for lasting solutions. 

In FY 2012, ESF OCO resources will be used to fund programs that have an immediate impact 

on counterinsurgency efforts. Funding will support the work being carried out by the 

provincial reconstruction teams (PRTs). These programs will include cash-for-work 

programs in the south and east that promote stability through temporary employment and 

income generation for targeted populations who may be vulnerable to joining the insurgency. 

They will also provide support to families and communities who have suffered from military 

operations and also generate short-term job opportunities or quick impact projects following a 

clearing operation of the military. 

ESF OCO funds also will support the counternarcotics strategy for Afghanistan. These funds 

will support the alternative development programs which will continue to focus on reducing 

illegal crop production through alternative livelihoods programs that improve economic 

opportunities in rural areas, expand the range of licit choices available to Afghan farmers, and 

reduce dependency on illicit opium production. To incentivize Afghan farmers to abandon 

poppy, USAID will focus resources toward licit income generation and job creation programs 

that give Afghan farmers a broader range of livelihood choices. Due to the nexus of the 

narcotics industry and the insurgency, providing alternatives to poppy production is critical to 

the stabilization of Afghanistan. 

In addition to these areas, FY 2012 ESF OCO will fund the strategic communications program 

whose core objective is countering extremist voices and building Afghan communication 

capacity. To help break the cycle of skepticism and apathy, the requested resources will focus 

on establishing and solidifying effective communications between and among the Afghan 

people, the Afghan Government, and the people and governments of the United States and 

Coalition partners. 

Finally, ESF OCO funds will support large infrastructure programs. These projects are the 

lifeline economic activity requires to prosper and upon which the country will rely as it 

transitions to long-term development. The infrastructure programs represent a concerted 

civil-military effort that unites DoD and ESF funds in the Afghanistan Infrastructure Program 

137
 

 

 

 

(AIP) to achieve shared objectives. Under the AIP, DoD resources from the Afghanistan 

Infrastructure Fund (AIF) are oriented to infrastructure in key terrain districts (KTDs) that 

require greater COIN impacts, by providing fuel and expanding power, transport, and water 

services in southern and eastern provinces. ESF OCO resources are focused to support the 

broader energy security needs of the nation, developing indigenous power production and 

expanding power transmission capability, reliability and efficiency. Therefore, the ESF OCO 

resources will serve as the bridge from short-term temporary solutions provided through AIF 

funding to long-term sustainable solutions that are required to both keep the insurgency 

defeated but also guarantee sustained economic growth. 

138
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

International Narcotics and Law Enforcement - OCO 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

International Narcotics and Law 

Enforcement - OCO 

702,000 702,000 - 1,000,000 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117), supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), and includes forward funding 

from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The FY 2012 International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement (INCLE) request includes 

funding for Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) for Iraq. The request of $1,000 million 

will support a full year of operations of the Police Development Program (PDP) in Iraq. The 

PDP, designed as a strong successor to the United States military police training program, will 

increase the ability of the Ministry of Interior and the Iraqi Police Services to manage and 

sustain the full range of policing operations and ensure that civilian police have primacy for 

providing Iraq’s internal security. This effort will support and protect U.S. strategic interests 

in the region by promoting democracy and the rule of law, discouraging corruption and 

sectarian behavior, and assisting in the development of a sovereign, stable and self-reliant Iraq. 

The PDP will include approximately 190 advisors, based in three hub cities (Baghdad, Basrah, 

and Erbil), who will travel to approximately 30 Government of Iraq critical 'spoke' sites in an 

estimated ten provinces. Th e advisors will help to build capacity in higher-level management 

and leadership through on-site mentoring, advising, and training. The PDP will focus on 

advancing specialized policing skills such as criminal investigations, forensics, and border 

security for Iraqi officials at all levels as appropriate, working with the Department of Justice 

(DOJ) (e.g., the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), the Drug 

Enforcement Administration (DEA), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and the U.S. 

Marshals Service) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) (e.g., U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement). In addition, the program 

will fund Iraqi officers to attend United States-based training at policing academies and those 

facilities operated by the FBI, DEA, ATF, and DHS or other international police training 

venues such as the International Law Enforcement Academies. The PDP also includes a 

robust instructor-development program and supports training at regional and national Iraqi 

academies to ensure a uniform training standard throughout the country. 

The PDP is complemented by robust rule of law programs for integrated criminal justice sector 

development. The DOJ/FBI-led joint Government of Iraq-United States Government Major 

Crimes Task Force will provide U.S. law enforcement agents who will work closely with Iraqi 

investigators, building capacity to investigate high profile crimes such as terrorism, public 

corruption, kidnapping, human trafficking, and organized crime. DOJ also will participate 

with a number of other implementers in efforts to build communication between the provincial 

courts and the central courts in Baghdad, resolving roadblocks in the Iraqi legal system, and 

helping develop the Higher Judicial Council’s administrative capacity. 

Funds will also support capacity-building work in the justice sector by addressing judicial and 

courthouse security, administrative processes, and investigative practices. The corrections 

program will build advanced skills in senior leaders at post-trial corrections facilities and begin 

139
 

 

 

to reform Iraq's 1,200 jails and detention centers for pre-trial detainees. A demand reduction 

program will support education and technical development to provide prevention and treatment 

services and implement a nationwide drug demand reduction strategy. Funds will also support 

a very substantial anti-corruption,anti-money laundering, and anti-terrorist financing program, 

working with the Commission on Integrity, the Inspectors General, and the Central Bank of 

Iraq. 

In addition to providing criminal justice sector programmatic support, funds will pay for 

Embassy-provided security and life support, aviation, and other transportation operations and 

maintenance, and personnel recruitment and training. 

140
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign Military Financing - OCO 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

Foreign Military Financing - OCO - - - 1,000,000 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117), supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), and includes forward funding 

from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The FY 2012 Foreign Military Financing (FMF) request includes funding for Overseas 

Contingency Operations for Iraq. This request reflects the transition of responsibility for 

military assistance programs from the Department of Defense to the Department of State. 

These programs have been funded in the past through the Iraq Security Forces Fund. FMF 

funding for Iraq will ensure sustainment of advances that Iraq has made in assuming 

responsibility for its own security. 

The request of $1,000 million will support the continued development of the Iraqi military until 

the Iraqis become self-sufficient, which is critical to Iraq's full assumption of security 

responsibilities and will provide an important vehicle for cementing the United States' enduring 

partnership with Iraq during an important period of transition. 

The requested funding for FY 2012 broadly focuses on helping the Iraqis increase the capacity 

and professionalism of the Iraqi military and builds upon the efforts made since 2003 by the 

United States military, Coalition forces, and Iraqi military operations and initiatives. The FMF 

program will parallel the stand up of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq and will help 

ensure that a strong relationship is in place as Iraq continues to use its own fiscal resources to 

contribute to peace and security in the region. The program will be focused on closing gaps in 

the Iraq Security Force’s minimum essential capabilities, supporting the development of 

enduring logistics capabilities and institutions to sustain U.S. and Iraqi post-war investments, 

and strengthening the United States' long-term strategic partnership with Iraq. 

141
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pakistan Counterinsurgency Capability Fund - OCO 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total 1/ 

FY 2010 

Actual 

Total 2/ 

FY 2011 

CR 3/ 

FY 2012 

Request 

Pakistan Counterinsurgency Capability 

Fund - OCO 

- - - 1,100,000 

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 

111-117), supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), and includes forward funding 

from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

The Pakistan Counterinsurgency Capability Fund (PCCF) is critical to supporting Pakistan’s 

security forces engaged in counterinsurgency (COIN) operations against militant extremists in 

the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) and Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa. PCCF helps 

Pakistan’s security forces develop the military capabilities needed to engage in operations 

which reduces extremist access to safe havens in the border regions from which attacks on U.S. 

and international forces in Afghanistan are planned and executed. The FY 2012 PCCF request 

of $1,100 million will continue to accelerate the development of the Pakistan security forces’ 

capacity to secure its borders with Afghanistan, deny safe haven to extremists, fight insurgents, 

and provide security for the local population. A more capable security force will facilitate the 

efforts of the Government of Pakistan to improve basic government services in areas vulnerable 

to extremists, supported by a robust U.S. civilian assistance strategy and funding. 

PCCF funding will enhance the capabilities of the Pakistan Army, the Pakistan Special Services 

Group, the Pakistan Air Force, and the Frontier Corps in the following key areas: air mobility; 

night operations; counter-improvised explosive devices; command and control; intelligence, 

surveillance and reconnaissance; close air support; joint fires; intelligence driven operations; 

combat logistics and sustainment; and civil-military operations. Funding will provide a 

combination of infrastructure enhancements, equipment, and counter-insurgency related 

training. In addition, training and equipment for the FATA Levy forces will continue with 

modest PCCF funding. 

Highlights: 

	 Funding will support the critical development of air mobility assets. Army aviators 

and maintenance technicians will be trained in helicopter combat operations, resupply, 

and maintenance procedures, increasing their ability to support and sustain ground 

combat operations. Pilots will receive training in night operations, precision 

targeting, close air support, and in the use of special munitions in support of the ground 

fight. 

	 Funding will support the continued development of distributed intelligence fusion 

centers that allow Pakistan to better receive and fuse data from various intelligence 

collection sources, which will allow for better planning and execution of 

counterinsurgency operations. Funds will also support the development of Frontier 

Corps sector headquarters, which are used to coordinate patrolling and monitoring of 

operations, and Frontier Corps training facilities, which build and maintain proficiency 

on counterinsurgency tactics, techniques, and procedures. 

142
 

 

 Equipment will be provided to battalion-sized units to enhance and modernize the 

communications, logistical support, night vision, air mobility, and air support 

infrastructure of Pakistan’s security forces, leading to more effective COIN operations 

and the reduction of collateral damage. 

 Training will be provided to Pakistan’s security forces in COIN doctrine and in 

conducting civil-military operations such as humanitarian assistance and relief 

operations. 

143
 

This Page Intentionally Left Blank. 

144
APPENDIX: 

ACCOUNT TABLES 

145
 

This Page Intentionally Left Blank. 

146
Global Health and Child Survival - USAID 

($ in thousands) 

 FY 2010

Enacted 

Total1 

 FY 2010

Actual Total2 FY 2011 CR3 FY 2012 

Request 

ADJUSTED GHCS-USAID TOTAL (Enduring) 2,470,000 2,473,600 2,420,000 3,073,600

 Africa 1,145,205 1,145,205 * 1,605,581

 Angola 45,750 45,750 * 42,575

 Benin 30,900 30,900 * 28,850

 Burkina Faso 6,000 6,000 * 6,000

 Burundi 12,060 12,060 * 11,560

 Cameroon 1,500 1,500 * 1,500

 Democratic Republic of the Congo 65,700 65,700 * 95,550

 Djibouti 396 396 * -

Ethiopia 87,200 87,200 * 132,450

 Ghana 59,100 59,100 * 82,400

 Guinea 7,500 7,500 * 7,500

 Kenya 71,550 71,550 * 103,000

 Lesotho 6,400 6,400 * 6,400

 Liberia 34,850 34,850 * 39,500

 Madagascar 58,400 58,400 * 61,300

 Malawi 63,600 63,600 * 89,500

 Mali 49,950 49,950 * 74,000

 Mozambique 64,175 64,175 * 88,300

 Namibia 1,950 1,950 * -

Nigeria 69,100 69,100 * 117,000

 Rwanda 37,500 37,500 * 54,700

 Senegal 48,350 48,350 * 60,800

 Somalia 1,550 1,550 * 1,550

 South Africa 14,500 14,500 * 16,500

 Sudan 30,010 30,010 * 38,510

 Swaziland 6,900 6,900 * 6,900

 Tanzania 83,525 83,525 * 124,000

 Uganda 66,000 66,000 * 99,500

 Zambia 50,900 50,900 * 61,300

 Zimbabwe 24,500 24,500 * 26,500

 Africa Regional 19,774 19,774 * 103,410

 East Africa Regional 9,585 9,585 * 9,250

 Southern Africa Regional 2,000 2,000 * 2,000

 West Africa Regional 14,030 14,030 * 13,276

 East Asia and Pacific 128,520 128,520 * 171,450

 Burma 2,100 2,100 * 2,100

 Cambodia 31,500 31,500 * 36,500

 China 4,000 4,000 * 4,000

 Indonesia 36,950 36,950 * 69,350

 Laos 1,000 1,000 * 1,000

 Papua New Guinea 2,500 2,500 * 2,500

147
Global Health and Child Survival - USAID 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2011 CR3 FY 2012 

Request 

Philippines 33,220 33,220 * 35,500

 Thailand 1,000 1,000 * 1,000

 Timor-Leste 2,000 2,000 * 4,000

 Regional Development Mission-Asia (RDM/A) 14,250 14,250 * 15,500

 Europe and Eurasia 14,600 14,600 * 14,450

 Armenia 400 400 * -

Azerbaijan 1,250 1,250 * -

Russia 8,500 8,500 * 9,500

 Ukraine 4,000 4,000 * 4,500

 Eurasia Regional 450 450 * 450

 Near East 8,000 8,000 * 21,000

 Yemen 8,000 8,000 * 21,000

 South and Central Asia 285,799 285,799 * 256,200

 Afghanistan 91,827 91,827 * 500

 Bangladesh 53,200 53,200 * 97,200

 India 78,200 78,200 * 96,000

 Kazakhstan 2,200 2,200 * 2,200

 Kyrgyz Republic 1,200 1,200 * 1,200

 Nepal 25,000 25,000 * 51,500

 Pakistan 29,722 29,722 * 2,000

 Tajikistan 1,450 1,450 * 2,700

 Turkmenistan 600 600 * 200

 Uzbekistan 2,400 2,400 * 2,700

 Western Hemisphere 130,589 130,589 * 131,021

 Bolivia 16,910 16,910 * 14,100

 Brazil 5,000 5,000 * -

Dominican Republic 9,050 9,050 * 7,750

 El Salvador 5,490 5,490 * 3,090

 Guatemala 14,600 14,600 * 17,600

 Haiti 22,800 22,800 * 43,000

 Honduras 11,000 11,000 * 10,000

 Jamaica 1,200 1,200 * 1,200

 Mexico 3,458 3,458 * 3,700

 Nicaragua 5,900 5,900 * 3,200

 Paraguay 2,100 2,100 * -

Peru 11,240 11,240 * 5,640

 Barbados and Eastern Caribbean 5,750 5,750 * 5,750

 Central America Regional 5,391 5,391 * 5,391

 Latin America and Caribbean Regional 5,400 5,400 * 5,600

 South America Regional 5,300 5,300 * 5,000

Asia Middle East Regional 5,500 5,500 * 5,500

DCHA - Democracy, Conflict, and Humanitarian Assistance 13,000 13,000 * 13,000

148

 FY 2010

Actual Total2 

 FY 2010

Enacted 

Total1 
Global Health and Child Survival - USAID 

($ in thousands) 

GH - Global Health 

Global Health - Core4 

Blind Children 

Commodity Fund 

Global Alliance for Vaccine Immunization 

International AIDS Vaccine Initiative 

Iodine Deficiency Disorder 

Microbicides 

Neglected Tropical Diseases 

Pandemic Influenza and Other Emerging Threats5 

TB Drug Facility 

Multiple Drug Resistance Financing 

New Partners Fund 

Plus Non-War Supplemental 

Pandemic Influenza and Other Emerging Threats 

GHCS-USAID Total 

Enacted 

Total1 Actual Total FY 2011 CR3 

FY 2010

738,787 742,387 *

316,742 320,342 *

2,000 2,000 *

20,335 20,335 *

78,000 78,000 *

28,710 28,710 *

2,000 2,000 *

45,000 45,000 *

65,000 65,000 *

156,000 156,000 *

15,000 15,000 *

- - *

10,000 10,000 *

45,000 45,000 *

45,000 45,000 *

2,515,000 2,518,600 2,420,000

FY 2012 

Request 

855,398

452,353

2,000

20,335

115,000

28,710

2,000

45,000

100,000

60,000

15,000

5,000

10,000

-

-

3,073,600

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-

117), supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), and includes forward funding from the 

Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

4/ The FY 2010 Actual level reflects the transfer of $3.6 million from International Organizations & Programs to GHCS-USAID. 

5/ $50 million GHCS-USAID in the Supplemental Appropriation Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32) was designated as forward funding for FY 

2010 and is reflected in the FY 2010 Enacted Total and FY 2010 Actual Total. 

149
Global Health and Child Survival - State 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total1 Actual Total2 FY 2011 CR3 FY 2012 

Request 

TOTAL (Enduring) 5,359,000 5,359,000 5,359,000 5,641,900

 Africa 3,633,550 3,516,103 * 3,774,390

 Angola 10,300 10,300 * 10,609

 Botswana 76,443 76,443 * 71,000

 Burundi - - * 5,000

 Cameroon 1,250 1,250 * 11,250

 Cote d'Ivoire 133,305 103,305 * 142,455

 Democratic Republic of the Congo 19,635 19,635 * 49,635

 Djibouti 150 150 * 1,800

 Ethiopia 323,679 286,699 * 314,089

 Ghana 7,000 7,000 * 9,270

 Kenya 528,760 528,760 * 544,623

 Lesotho 21,650 21,650 * 22,300

 Liberia 800 800 * 2,800

 Madagascar 500 500 * 500

 Malawi 36,448 36,448 * 47,841

 Mali 1,500 1,500 * 7,500

 Mozambique 261,953 261,953 * 269,811

 Namibia 100,809 100,809 * 99,500

 Nigeria 471,227 471,227 * 471,227

 Rwanda 124,072 124,072 * 120,000

 Senegal 1,535 1,768 * 1,535

 Sierra Leone 500 500 * 500

 South Africa 545,969 545,969 * 509,969

 Sudan 7,036 7,036 * 12,397

 Swaziland 20,700 20,700 * 38,831

 Tanzania 336,254 336,254 * 346,342

 Uganda 294,084 271,584 * 322,906

 Zambia 283,661 253,661 * 292,170

 Zimbabwe 24,330 24,330 * 44,330

 East Africa Regional - - * 800

 Southern Africa Regional - 1,800 * 3,400

 East Asia and Pacific 106,968 106,968 * 102,216

 Cambodia 3,000 3,000 * 3,090

 China 3,000 3,000 * 3,000

 Indonesia 5,250 5,250 * 5,408

 Papua New Guinea - - * 5,000

 Thailand 500 500 * 500

 Vietnam 94,978 94,978 * 84,978

 Regional Development Mission-Asia (RDM/A) 240 240 * 240

 Europe and Eurasia 18,528 13,378 * 32,228

 Georgia 850 850 * 850

150
Global Health and Child Survival - State 

($ in thousands)

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total1 Actual Total2 FY 2011 CR3 FY 2012 

Request 

Russia 3,000 3,000 * 2,000

 Ukraine 14,678 9,528 * 29,378

 South and Central Asia 24,164 24,164 * 35,754

 Afghanistan 500 500 * 500

 India 9,000 9,000 * 9,000

 Kazakhstan 600 600 * 600

 Kyrgyz Republic 475 475 * 475

 Tajikistan 524 524 * 524

 Turkmenistan 75 75 * 75

 Uzbekistan 590 590 * 590

 Central Asia Regional 12,400 12,400 * 23,990

 Western Hemisphere 172,561 172,411 * 209,376

 Belize 20 20 * 20

 Brazil 1,300 1,300 * 1,300

 Dominican Republic 9,250 9,250 * 9,528

 El Salvador 20 20 * 20

 Guyana 16,525 16,525 * 13,525

 Haiti 121,240 121,240 * 160,928

 Honduras 1,000 1,000 * 1,000

 Jamaica 300 300 * 300

 Nicaragua 897 897 * 897

 Peru 50 50 * 50

 Barbados and Eastern Caribbean 14,700 14,550 * 14,550

 Central America Regional 6,171 6,171 * 6,170

 Latin America and Caribbean Regional 1,088 1,088 * 1,088

Asia Middle East Regional 650 650 * 650

S/GAC - Office of the Global AIDS Coordinator 1,402,579 1,525,326 * 1,487,286

 Management, Evaluation and Technical Support and Additional 

Funding for Country Programs 609,579 732,326 * 442,286

 International Partnerships 793,000 793,000 * 1,045,000

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-

117), supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), and includes forward funding from the 

Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

151
Development Assistance 

($ in thousands) 

Enacted 

Total1 Actual Total2 FY 2011 CR3 FY 2012 

Request 

TOTAL (Enduring) 2,520,000 2,520,000 2,520,000 2,918,002

Africa 1,078,530 1,075,632 * 1,166,336

Angola 20,192 20,192 * 11,724

Benin 5,364 5,364 * -

Burkina Faso - 1,375 * -

Burundi 12,124 12,124 * 4,736

Cameroon 1,344 1,344 * -

Chad 473 473 * -

Djibouti 6,542 6,542 * 2,450

Ethiopia 80,803 82,177 * 84,724

Ghana 72,122 73,497 * 111,623

Guinea 14,518 14,518 * 6,000

Kenya 76,885 79,395 * 89,691

Liberia - 1,375 * -

Madagascar 10,500 10,500 * -

Malawi 27,596 29,851 * 45,989

Mali 55,891 55,891 * 79,722

Mauritania 1,199 1,199 * -

Mauritius 150 150 * -

Mozambique 38,107 38,107 * 43,460

Niger 1,973 1,973 * -

Nigeria 70,967 70,967 * 70,276

Rwanda 45,900 45,900 * 65,983

Senegal 55,153 56,528 * 56,250

South Africa 13,941 16,316 * 29,842

Sudan - 1,300 * -

Tanzania 43,150 38,252 * 100,000

Togo 95 95 * -

Uganda 70,650 72,025 * 77,933

Zambia 46,054 46,054 * 46,050

African Union - 1,500 * -

Africa Regional 130,205 108,916 * 60,023

Central Africa Regional 20,500 20,500 * 23,210

East Africa Regional 46,793 48,093 * 52,913

Southern Africa Regional 26,127 26,927 * 27,670

West Africa Regional 83,212 86,212 * 76,067

East Asia and Pacific 240,824 240,824 * 380,642

Cambodia 19,000 19,000 * 37,300

China 12,000 12,000 * -

Indonesia 73,500 73,500 * 138,147

Laos 513 513 * 1,508

Marshall Islands 500 500 * 1,500

Micronesia 500 500 * 1,500

FY 2010 

152
Development Assistance 

($ in thousands)

Enacted 

Total1 Actual Total2 FY 2011 CR3 FY 2012 

Request 

FY 2010 

Mongolia 7,500 7,500 * 6,300

Philippines 40,310 40,310 * 89,855

Thailand 6,151 6,151 * 6,151

Timor-Leste 20,200 20,200 * 13,228

Vietnam 16,500 16,500 * 32,653

Regional Development Mission for the Pacific (RDM/P) - - * 9,500

Regional Development Mission-Asia (RDM/A) 44,150 44,150 * 43,000

Near East 64,935 64,935 * 29,954

Algeria 710 710 * -

Morocco 19,546 19,546 * 26,454

Yemen 35,000 35,000 * -

Middle East Regional (OMEP) 9,679 9,679 * 3,500

South and Central Asia 112,788 112,788 * 180,446

Bangladesh 66,271 66,271 * 119,902

India 31,250 31,250 * 31,000

Maldives 1,000 1,000 * 3,000

Nepal - - * 6,000

Sri Lanka 9,900 9,900 * 15,994

South Asia Regional 4,367 4,367 * 4,550

Western Hemisphere 414,553 420,451 * 415,176

Bolivia 35,248 35,248 * 8,350

Brazil 16,789 16,789 * 12,000

Dominican Republic 24,600 24,600 * 18,273

Ecuador 24,783 24,783 * 22,940

El Salvador 23,904 23,904 * 30,000

Guatemala 38,726 38,726 * 50,825

Guyana 4,809 4,809 * -

Honduras 37,491 37,491 * 55,266

Jamaica 7,559 7,559 * 9,363

Mexico 10,000 10,000 * 33,350

Nicaragua 27,344 27,344 * 19,964

Panama 6,420 6,420 * -

Paraguay 8,287 8,287 * 7,000

Peru 63,334 63,334 * 71,019

Barbados and Eastern Caribbean 14,818 14,818 * 19,246

Caribbean Basin Security Initiative [6,000] [6,000] * -

Central America Regional 17,786 17,786 * 17,950

Latin America and Caribbean Regional 51,471 57,369 * 39,100

South America Regional 1,184 1,184 * 530

Asia Middle East Regional 52,356 52,356 * 22,000

BFS - Bureau for Food Security - - * 310,200

DCHA - Democracy, Conflict, and Humanitarian Assistance 110,438 110,438 * 139,651

153
Development Assistance 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total1 Actual Total2 FY 2011 CR3 FY 2012 

Request 

EGAT - Economic Growth Agriculture and Trade 280,334 280,334 * 157,700

MFS - Multilateral Food Security Programs 66,600 66,600 * -

Development Partnerships 59,437 60,437 * 44,124

Unallocated 39,205 30,305 * -

USAID Forward: Program Effectiveness Initiatives - 4,900 * 71,773

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-

117), supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), and includes forward funding from the 

Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

154
Economic Support Fund 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total1 Actual Total2 FY 2011 CR3 FY 2012 

Request 

ADJUSTED ESF TOTAL (Enduring + War Supplemental) 6,569,567 6,563,398 6,344,000 5,968,663

 Africa 629,604 633,104 * 618,549

 Comoros - 550 * -

Democratic Republic of the Congo 59,100 62,600 * 59,908

 Kenya - 4,000 * -

Liberia 153,000 153,000 * 124,276

 Mali - 1,000 * -

Senegal - 400 * -

Sierra Leone 18,000 18,000 * 9,824

 Somalia 28,270 31,270 * 25,821

 Sudan 296,034 296,034 * 335,650

 Zimbabwe 40,200 40,200 * 39,120

 African Union 1,500 1,500 * 1,000

 State Africa Regional 23,500 22,550 * 22,950

 Kimberley Process [3,000] [3,000] * -

Trans-Sahara Counter-Terrorism Partnership [5,000] [5,000] * -

USAID Africa Regional 10,000 500 * -

Horn of Africa and Pan Sahel Program 4 [10,000] [500] *

 East Africa Regional - 750 * -

West Africa Regional - 750 * -

East Asia and Pacific 178,900 178,900 * 57,710

 Burma 36,500 36,500 * 35,100

 Cambodia 15,000 15,000 * 5,000

 China 7,400 7,400 * 5,000

 Indonesia 65,000 65,000 * -

North Korea 3,500 3,500 * -

Philippines 30,000 30,000 * -

Thailand 2,500 2,500 * -

Timor-Leste 3,000 3,000 * -

Vietnam 4,000 4,000 * -

East Asia and Pacific Regional 12,000 12,000 * 12,610

 Europe and Eurasia 33,000 33,000 * 6,000

 Cyprus 11,000 11,000 * 3,500

 Eurasia Regional 3,000 3,000 * -

Europe Regional 2,000 2,000 * -

International Fund for Ireland 17,000 17,000 * 2,500

 Near East 1,625,900 1,625,900 * 1,593,160

 Egypt 250,000 250,000 * 250,000

 Iraq 382,500 382,500 * 325,700

 Jordan 363,000 363,000 * 360,000

 Lebanon 109,000 109,000 * 100,000

 Morocco 3,000 3,000 * -

155
Economic Support Fund 

($ in thousands) 

Tunisia 

West Bank and Gaza 

Yemen 

Middle East Multilaterals (MEM) 

Middle East Partnership Initiative (MEPI) 

Middle East Regional Cooperation (MERC) 

Near East Regional Democracy 

Trans-Sahara Counter-Terrorism Partnership (TSCTP) 

Middle East Regional (OMEP) 

South and Central Asia 

Afghanistan 

Nepal 

Pakistan5 

South and Central Asia Regional 

Western Hemisphere 

Colombia 

Cuba 

El Salvador 

Guatemala 

Haiti 

Mexico 

Venezuela 

Western Hemisphere Regional 

Central America Regional Security Initiative 

Caribbean Basin Security Initiative 

DCHA - Democracy, Conflict, and Humanitarian Assistance 

Extractive Industries Transparency 

House Democracy Assistance Program 

Wheelchairs 

Disability Program 

Reconciliation Program 

DRL - Democracy, Human Rights and Labor 

EGAT - Economic Growth Agriculture and Trade 

G/TIP - Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking In Persons 

OES - Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific 

Affairs 

Special Representatives 

Internet Freedom 

Unallocated 

Enacted 

Total1 Actual Total2 FY 2011 CR3 

FY 2010

2,000 2,000 *

393,400 393,400 *

5,000 5,000 *

1,000 1,000 *

65,000 65,000 *

5,000 5,000 *

40,000 40,000 *

6,000 6,000 *

1,000 1,000 *

3,329,567 3,329,567 *

2,003,567 2,003,567 *

27,000 27,000 *

1,292,000 1,292,000 *

7,000 7,000 *

485,540 485,540 *

201,790 201,790 *

20,000 20,000 *

- - *

- - *

160,750 160,750 *

15,000 15,000 *

6,000 6,000 *

82,000 82,000 *

[23,000] [23,000] *

[14,000] [14,000] *

37,500 37,500 *

4,500 4,500 *

2,000 2,000 *

10,000 10,000 *

5,000 5,000 *

16,000 16,000 *

500 500 *

- - *

12,000 12,000 *

178,800 178,800 *

- - *

10,000 10,000 *

48,256 38,587 *

FY 2012 

Request 

-

400,400

47,560

1,500

70,000

1,500

35,000

1,500

-

2,980,089

1,587,630

29,835

1,359,600

3,024

477,649

189,108

20,000

-

5,000

146,281

33,260

5,000

79,000

[45,000]

[17,000]

-

66,542

39,900

-

125,064

4,000

-

-

156
1,342,433 1,342,433 * 1,216,600

Enacted 

Total1 Actual Total2 FY 2011 CR3 FY 2012 

Request 

Economic Support Fund 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Plus Overseas Contingency Operations 1,342,433 1,342,433 * 1,216,600

7,912,000 7,905,831 * 7,185,263

912,000 912,000 * -

15,000 15,000 * -

12,000 12,000 * -

100,000 100,000 * -

25,000 25,000 * -

760,000 760,000 * -

8,824,000 8,817,831 6,344,000 7,185,263

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-

117), supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), and includes forward funding from the 

Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

4/ In FY 2010, funding for the Horn of Africa and Pan Sahel program has been allocated to country programs. 

5/ The FY 2010 Actual level reflects the transfer of $6.2 million from ESF to FMF. It does not include $3.8 million transferred from 

prior year funds. 

Afghanistan 

SUBTOTAL Core + OCO 

Plus Non-War Supplemental 

Democratic Republic of the Congo 

Vietnam 

Jordan 

El Salvador 

Haiti 

ESF TOTAL 

157
Assistance for Europe, Eurasia and Central Asia 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total1 Actual Total2 FY 2011 CR3 FY 2012 

Request 

TOTAL (Enduring) 741,632 741,632 741,632 626,718

 Europe and Eurasia 610,982 610,882 * 513,907

 Albania 22,000 22,000 * 16,000

 Armenia 41,000 41,000 * 40,000

 Azerbaijan 22,000 22,000 * 16,600

 Belarus 15,000 15,000 * 11,000

 Bosnia and Herzegovina 36,000 36,000 * 39,000

 Bulgaria 800 800 * -

Georgia 59,000 59,000 * 66,732

 Kosovo 95,000 95,000 * 63,000

 Macedonia 22,000 22,000 * 14,000

 Moldova 19,000 19,650 * 21,000

 Montenegro 8,500 8,500 * 3,140

 Poland - - * 3,000

 Russia 59,000 59,000 * 52,335

 Serbia 49,000 49,000 * 33,500

 Ukraine 89,000 89,000 * 79,100

 Eurasia Regional 39,341 38,591 * 29,500

 Europe Regional 34,341 34,341 * 26,000

 South and Central Asia 130,650 130,750 * 112,811

 Kazakhstan 10,400 10,400 * 14,100

 Kyrgyz Republic 46,000 46,000 * 40,800

 Tajikistan 42,500 42,500 * 38,751

 Turkmenistan 12,500 12,500 * 8,000

 Uzbekistan 8,250 8,250 * 7,540

 Central Asia Regional 11,000 11,100 * 3,620

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-

117), supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), and includes forward funding from the 

Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

158
Migration and Refugee Assistance & U.S. Emergency Refugee and Migration 

Assistance Fund 

($ in thousands) 

Enacted 

Total1 Actual Total2 FY 2011 CR3 FY 2012 

Request 

FY 2010 

ADJUSTED MRA TOTAL (Enduring) 

PRM - Population, Refugees, and Migration 

Africa 

East Asia 

Europe 

Near East 

South Asia 

Western Hemisphere 

Migration 

Administrative Expenses 

Protection Priorities 

Humanitarian Migrants to Israel 

Refugee Admissions 

1,693,000

1,693,000

345,780

36,020

47,850

544,500

130,950

48,500

16,200

26,000

148,200

25,000

324,000

1,693,000 1,693,000 1,613,100

1,693,000 * 1,613,100

345,780 * 325,000

36,020 * 37,000

47,850 * 29,000

544,500 * 515,343

130,950 * 106,000

48,500 * 37,000

16,200 * 13,000

26,000 * 33,500

148,200 * 129,957

25,000 * 20,000

324,000 * 367,300

Plus Non-War Supplemental 165,000 165,000 * -

Africa 40,000 40,000 * -

East Asia 8,000 8,000 * -

Near East 60,000 60,000 * -

South Asia 27,000 27,000 * -

Protection Priorities 30,000 30,000 * -

MRA Total 1,858,000 1,858,000 1,693,000 1,613,100

U.S. Emergency Refugee and Migration Assistance Fund 45,000 45,000 45,000 32,000

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-

117), supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), and includes forward funding from the 

Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

159
International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted Total1 Actual Total2 FY 2011 CR3 FY 2012 

Request 

ADJUSTED INCLE TOTAL (Enduring + War Supplemental) 1,848,000 1,848,000 1,597,000 1,511,838

 Africa 35,538 35,538 * 91,715

 Cape Verde 603 603 * -

Democratic Republic of the Congo 1,700 1,700 * 6,000

 Djibouti - - * 750

 Ethiopia - - * 500

 Ghana 500 500 * -

Guinea-Bissau 1,500 1,500 * -

Kenya - - * 2,000

 Liberia 9,000 9,000 * 17,000

 Mauritania - - * 330

 Mozambique 300 300 * 600

 Nigeria 500 500 * -

Sierra Leone 250 250 * -

Somalia - - * 2,000

 South Africa - - * 3,000

 Sudan 16,000 16,000 * 37,000

 Tanzania 450 450 * 950

 Uganda 235 235 * 1,535

 Zambia - - * 900

 Africa Regional 4,500 4,500 * 19,150

 East Asia and Pacific 18,575 18,575 * 21,090

 Cambodia - - * 670

 China 800 800 * 850

 Indonesia 11,570 11,570 * 11,570

 Laos 1,000 1,000 * 1,500

 Philippines 1,365 1,365 * 2,450

Thailand 1,740 1,740 * 1,740

 Timor-Leste 800 800 * 660

 Vietnam - - * 550

 State East Asia and Pacific Regional 1,300 1,300 * 1,100

 Europe and Eurasia - - * 500

 Turkey - - * 500

 Near East 126,250 126,250 * 154,620

 Algeria - - * 870

 Egypt 1,000 1,000 * 250

 Iraq - - * -

Jordan 1,500 1,500 * 500

 Lebanon 20,000 20,000 * 25,000

 Morocco 750 750 * 3,000

 West Bank and Gaza 100,000 100,000 * 113,000

160
International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement 

($ in thousands) 

Yemen 

Trans-Sahara Counter-Terrorism Partnership (TSCTP) 

South and Central Asia 

Afghanistan 

Bangladesh

Nepal 

Pakistan 

Sri Lanka

Western Hemisphere

Argentina 

Bolivia 

Brazil 

Chile

Colombia

Dominican Republic 

Ecuador 

Guatemala 

Central Amercian Regional Security Initiative 

Haiti 

Enacted Total1 

FY 2010

1,000

2,000

763,050

589,000

350

3,700

170,000

-

701,364

300

20,000

1,000

-

243,900

4,450

4,500

7,500

[1,500]

Actual Total2 

1,000

2,000

763,050

589,000

350

3,700

170,000

-

701,364

300

20,000

1,000

-

243,900

4,450

4,500

7,500

[1,500]

FY 2011 CR3 

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

FY 2012 

Request 

11,000

1,000

455,150

324,000

850

3,700

125,000

1,600

565,570

400

10,000

4,000

100

160,600

-

7,700

-

-

Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking In Persons 

Mexico4 

Paraguay 

Peru 

Uruguay 

Western Hemisphere Regional 

Central America Regional Security Initiative 5 

Caribbean Basin Security Initiative 

9,262

21,107

284,000

500

40,000

-

74,107

[52,912]

[10,607]

9,262

21,107 *

284,000 *

500 *

40,000 *

- *

74,107 *

[52,912] *

[10,607] *

* 20,808

19,420

248,500

800

28,950

100

85,000

[55,000]

[30,000]

International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs 

Alien Smuggling/Border Security 

Anti-Crime Programs 

Critical Flight Safety Program

Civilian Policing 

Criminal Youth Gangs 

Cyber Crime and IPR 

Demand Reduction

Fighting Corruption 

Global Peacekeeping Operations Initiative 

International Law Enforcement Academy 

Inter-regional Aviation Support 

International Organizations 

193,961

1,000

4,150

20,750

4,000

8,000

5,000

14,000

4,750

5,000

37,200

60,088

4,500

193,961

1,000

4,150

20,750

4,000

8,000

5,000

14,000

4,750

5,000

37,200

60,088

4,500

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

202,385

1,000

4,150

17,250

4,000

7,000

3,750

12,750

5,033

-

31,300

60,652

5,000

161
International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement 

($ in thousands) 

Enacted Total1 Actual Total2 FY 2011 CR3 FY 2012 

Request 

FY 2010

 Central Amercian Regional Security Initiative 

International Organized Crime 

International Police Peacekeeping Operations Support 

Program Development and Support 

[10,588]

1,000

-

24,523

[10,588]

1,000

-

24,523

*

*

*

*

-

1,000

15,000

34,500

 Iraq 

Plus Overseas Contingency Operations 

SUBTOTAL Enduring + OCO

702,000

702,000

2,550,000

702,000

702,000

2,550,000

*

*

*

1,000,000

1,000,000

2,511,838

Mexico 

Plus Non-War Supplemental 

Haiti 

INCLE TOTAL 

175,000

322,660

147,660

2,872,660

175,000

322,660

147,660

2,872,660

*

*

*

1,597,000

-

-

-

2,511,838

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117), 

supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), and includes forward funding from the 

Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

4/ $94 million INCLE in the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32) was designated as forward funding for FY 2010 and is 

reflected in the FY 2010 Enacted Total and FY 2010 Actual Total. 

5/ The Central America Regional Security Initiative funding is partially distributed in bilateral programs and INL central programs. 

162
Nonproliferation, Antiterrorism, Demining and Related Programs 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total1 Actual Total2 FY 2011 CR3 FY 2012 

Request 

TOTAL (Enduring) 754,000 754,000 754,000 708,540

Nonproliferation Programs 295,950 295,950 * 293,829

Nonproliferation and Disarmament Fund 75,000 75,000 * 30,000

Export Control and Related Border Security Assistance 53,950 53,950 * 60,909

Global Threat Reduction 70,000 70,000 * 68,978

IAEA Voluntary Contribution 65,000 65,000 * 85,900

CTBT / International Monitoring System 30,000 30,000 * 33,000

Weapons of Mass Destruction Terrorism 2,000 2,000 * 6,042

UN Security Council Resolution 1540 Trust Fund - - * 1,500

CTBTO Preparatory Commission-Special Contributions - - * 7,500

Anti-terrorism Programs 296,500 296,500 * 264,711

Anti-terrorism Assistance 215,000 215,000 * 192,711

 Caribbean Basin Security Initiative - - * [2,000]

Terrorist Interdiction Program 54,500 54,500 * 42,000

Counterterrorism Engagement with Allies 6,000 6,000 * 8,000

Counterterrorism Financing 21,000 21,000 * 17,000

Countering Violent Extremism - - * 5,000

Regional Stability and Humanitarian Assistance 161,550 161,550 * 150,000

Conventional Weapons Destruction4 - - * 150,000

Humanitarian Demining Program 77,850 99,296 * -

International Trust Fund 12,200 12,200 * -

Small Arms / Light Weapons Destruction 71,500 50,054 * -

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-

117), supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), and includes forward funding from the 

Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

4/ For FY 2012, funding for the Humantarian Demining, International Trust Fund, and Small Arms/Light Weapons Programs are 

being requested under Conventional Weapons Destruction. 

163
Peacekeeping Operations 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total1 Actual Total2 FY 2011 CR3 FY 2012 

Request 

TOTAL (Enduring) 331,500 331,500 331,500 292,000

 Africa 187,600 187,600 * 154,150

 Democratic Republic of the Congo 18,000 14,000 * 19,000

 Guinea - 1,600 * -

Liberia 10,000 10,000 * 5,000

 Somalia 102,000 102,000 * 51,000

 Sudan 44,000 44,000 * 60,000

 Uganda - 6,000 * -

Africa Regional 13,600 10,000 * 19,150

Multinational Force and Observers (MFO) 26,000 26,000 * 26,000

Political-Military Affairs 117,900 117,900 * 111,850

 Trans-Sahara Counter-Terrorism Partnership (TSCTP) 21,000 21,000 * 20,000

 Global Peacekeeping Operations Initiative (GPOI) 96,900 96,900 * 91,850

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-

117), supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), and includes forward funding from the 

Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

164
International Military Education and Training 

($ in thousands) 

Enacted 

Total1 Actual Total2 FY 2011 CR3 FY 2012 

Request 

TOTAL (Enduring) 108,000 108,000 108,000 109,954

 Africa 15,232 15,130 * 15,500

 Angola 475 373 * 450

 Benin 235 316 * 250

 Botswana 690 688 * 690

 Burkina Faso 235 261 * 250

 Burundi 275 345 * 325

 Cameroon 285 267 * 285

 Cape Verde 120 124 * 135

 Central African Republic 125 60 * 125

 Chad 380 375 * 380

 Comoros 125 111 * 125

 Cote d'Ivoire 32 - * 25

 Democratic Republic of the Congo 500 500 * 500

 Djibouti 330 379 * 350

 Ethiopia 700 336 * 695

 Gabon 200 200 * 200

 Ghana 800 794 * 825

 Guinea - - * 100

 Guinea-Bissau 100 - * 25

 Kenya 970 959 * 1,000

 Lesotho 100 177 * 100

 Liberia 500 488 * 525

 Madagascar 32 - * -

Malawi 300 300 * 300

 Mali 330 411 * 350

 Mauritania 113 147 * 150

 Mauritius 150 150 * 150

 Mozambique 380 385 * 400

 Namibia 140 140 * 150

 Niger - -* 25

 Nigeria 965 1,016 * 950

 Republic of the Congo 125 132 * 125

 Rwanda 500 512 * 500

 Sao Tome and Principe 180 171 * 180

 Senegal 1,000 991 * 950

 Seychelles 100 118 * 100

 Sierra Leone 400 403 * 400

 South Africa 850 845 * 875

 Sudan 800 793 * 800

 Swaziland 100 167 * 100

 Tanzania 400 397 * 400

 The Gambia 120 118 * 120

FY 2010 

165
International Military Education and Training 

($ in thousands)

Enacted 

Total1 Actual Total2 FY 2011 CR3 FY 2012 

Request 

FY 2010 

Togo 140 224 * 140

 Uganda 550 591 * 600

 Zambia 380 366 * 350

 Zimbabwe - -* 25

 East Asia and Pacific 8,930 8,878 * 9,185

 Cambodia 100 99 * 260

 Indonesia 1,750 1,819 * 1,800

 Laos 100 71 * 200

 Malaysia 950 950 * 950

 Marshall Islands 60 34 * 60

 Mongolia 1,000 1,006 * 1,000

 Philippines 1,850 1,850 * 1,850

 Samoa 40 36 * 40

 Thailand 1,500 1,571 * 1,400

 Timor-Leste 330 303 * 300

 Vietnam 400 400 * 650

 State East Asia and Pacific Regional 850 739 * 675

 Europe and Eurasia 30,205 30,532 * 30,100

 Albania 950 962 * 1,000

 Armenia 450 449 * 450

 Azerbaijan 900 886 * 900

 Bosnia and Herzegovina 1,000 990 * 1,000

 Bulgaria 1,650 1,719 * 1,700

 Croatia 800 864 * 900

 Czech Republic 1,900 1,892 * 2,000

 Estonia 1,100 1,156 * 1,150

 Georgia 1,800 1,806 * 2,000

 Greece 100 105 * 100

 Hungary 1,000 1,060 * 1,000

 Kosovo 700 700 * 700

 Latvia 1,100 1,100 * 1,150

 Lithuania 1,100 1,100 * 1,150

 Macedonia 950 955 * 1,000

 Malta 150 149 * 150

 Moldova 660 731 * 750

 Montenegro 400 398 * 500

 Poland 2,200 2,198 * 2,200

 Portugal 100 95 * 100

 Romania 1,700 1,760 * 1,800

 Russia 95 - * -

Serbia 900 903 * 900

 Slovakia 900 964 * 900

 Slovenia 700 694 * 700

166
International Military Education and Training 

($ in thousands)

Enacted 

Total1 Actual Total2 FY 2011 CR3 FY 2012 

Request 

FY 2010 

Turkey 5,000 4,992 * 4,000

 Ukraine 1,900 1,904 * 1,900

 Near East 18,593 18,520 * 18,275

 Algeria 950 950 * 1,300

 Bahrain 700 671 * 700

 Egypt 1,900 1,900 * 1,400

 Iraq 2,000 1,989 * 2,000

 Jordan 3,800 3,772 * 3,700

 Kuwait 10 - * -

Lebanon 2,500 2,500 * 2,500

 Libya 330 319 * 350

 Morocco 1,800 1,789 * 1,900

 Oman 1,525 1,525 * 1,650

 Qatar 10 - * -

Saudi Arabia 8 7 * -

Tunisia 1,950 1,945 * 1,675

 United Arab Emirates 10 - * -

Yemen 1,100 1,153 * 1,100

 South and Central Asia 13,480 13,404 * 14,725

 Afghanistan 1,500 1,756 * 2,400

 Bangladesh 1,000 1,009 * 1,000

 India 1,200 1,269 * 1,400

 Kazakhstan 785 779 * 785

 Kyrgyz Republic 1,000 843 * 1,000

 Maldives 195 203 * 195

 Nepal 900 896 * 1,000

 Pakistan 5,000 5,000 * 5,000

 Sri Lanka 750 731 * 695

 Tajikistan 600 456 * 600

 Turkmenistan 350 262 * 350

 Uzbekistan 200 200 * 300

 Western Hemisphere 16,455 16,315 * 16,610

 Argentina 900 900 * 950

 Belize 200 258 * 200

 Bolivia 380 366 * 260

 Brazil 610 610 * 650

 Chile 900 899 * 900

 Colombia 1,695 1,694 * 1,750

 Costa Rica 380 366 * 400

 Dominican Republic 850 844 * 850

 Ecuador 380 375 * 400

 El Salvador 1,750 1,708 * 1,100

 Guatemala 800 797 * 800

167
International Military Education and Training 

($ in thousands)

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total1 Actual Total2 FY 2011 CR3 FY 2012 

Request 

Guyana 300 300 * 325

 Haiti 220 92 * 220

 Honduras 700 777 * 700

 Jamaica 750 752 * 750

 Mexico 1,050 989 * 1,720

 Nicaragua 900 894 * 875

 Panama 750 750 * 800

 Paraguay 400 394 * 400

 Peru 650 627 * 650

 Suriname 260 250 * 250

 The Bahamas 200 200 * 200

 Trinidad and Tobago 170 167 * 180

 Uruguay 450 523 * 480

 Barbados and Eastern Caribbean 810 783 * 800

Political-Military Affairs 5,105 5,221 * 5,559

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-

117), supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), and includes forward funding from the 

Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

168
Foreign Military Financing 

($ in thousands) 

Enacted 

Total1 Actual Total2 FY 2011 CR3 FY 2012 

Request 

ADJUSTED FMF TOTAL (Enduring + War Supplemental) 5,470,000 5,476,169 5,160,000 5,550,463

 Africa 18,793 17,950 * 18,793

 Botswana 200 200 * 200

 Cameroon - 350 * -

Chad 500 500 * 200

 Democratic Republic of the Congo 1,450 1,450 * 300

 Djibouti 2,000 2,000 * 2,000

 Ethiopia 843 - * 843

 Gabon 200 520 * 200

 Ghana 350 550 * 425

 Kenya 1,000 1,500 * 2,200

 Liberia 6,000 6,000 * 7,300

 Mali 200 200 * 200

 Mauritania - - * 200

 Nigeria 1,350 1,850 * 1,000

 Rwanda 200 200 * 200

 Sao Tome and Principe - 330 * -

Senegal 300 300 * 325

 Sierra Leone - 200 * -

South Africa 800 800 * 700

 Tanzania 200 700 * 200

 Uganda 300 300 * 300

 Africa Regional 2,900 - * 2,000

 East Asia and Pacific 62,100 59,100 * 42,175

 Cambodia 1,000 1,000 * 800

 Indonesia 20,000 20,000 * 20,000

 Mongolia 4,500 4,500 * 3,000

 Philippines 32,000 29,000 * 15,000

 Thailand 1,600 1,600 * 1,060

 Timor-Leste 500 500 * -

Tonga 500 500 * -

Vietnam 2,000 2,000 * 2,315

 Europe and Eurasia 137,855 137,855 * 123,400

 Albania 3,000 3,000 * 3,000

 Armenia 3,000 3,000 * 3,000

 Azerbaijan 3,000 3,000 * 3,000

 Bosnia and Herzegovina 4,000 4,000 * 5,000

 Bulgaria 9,000 9,000 * 9,000

 Croatia 2,500 2,500 * 2,500

 Czech Republic 6,000 6,000 * 6,000

 Estonia 2,500 2,500 * 2,500

 Georgia 16,000 16,000 * 16,000

 Hungary 1,000 1,000 * 1,000

FY 2010 

169
Foreign Military Financing 

($ in thousands)

Enacted 

Total1 Actual Total2 FY 2011 CR3 FY 2012 

Request 

FY 2010 

Kosovo 2,500 2,500 * 3,000

Latvia 2,500 2,500 * 2,500

 Lithuania 2,700 2,700 * 2,700

 Macedonia 4,000 4,000 * 4,000

Malta 455 455 * -

Moldova 750 750 * 1,250

Montenegro 1,200 1,200 * 1,200

Poland 47,000 47,000 * 32,000

Romania 13,000 13,000 * 13,000

Serbia 1,000 1,000 * 2,000

Slovakia 1,250 1,250 * 1,250

Slovenia 500 500 * 500

Ukraine 11,000 11,000 * 9,000

Near East 4,542,498 4,542,498 * 4,858,650

Bahrain 19,000 19,000 * 25,000

 Egypt4 1,300,000 1,300,000 * 1,300,000

 Iraq - - * -

Israel4 2,775,000 2,775,000 * 3,075,000

 Jordan4 300,000 300,000 * 300,000

Lebanon 100,000 100,000 * 100,000

 Libya 150 150 * 250

Morocco 9,000 9,000 * 9,000

 Oman 8,848 8,848 * 9,500

 Tunisia 18,000 18,000 * 4,900

 Yemen 12,500 12,500 * 35,000

 South and Central Asia 301,300 311,312 * 359,040

 Bangladesh 1,500 1,500 * 1,500

Kazakhstan 3,000 6,843 * 2,000

 Kyrgyz Republic 3,500 3,500 * 1,900

 Maldives - - * 500

 Nepal 800 800 * 940

 Pakistan5 288,000 294,169 * 350,000

 Sri Lanka 1,000 1,000 * 500

 Tajikistan 1,500 1,500 * 800

 Turkmenistan 2,000 2,000 * 800

 Uzbekistan - - * 100

 Western Hemisphere 352,990 352,990 * 85,605

 Belize - - * 200

 Chile 600 600 * -

Colombia 55,000 55,000 * 44,000

 Costa Rica - - * 315

 Dominican Republic 1,000 1,000 * -

Ecuador 500 500 * 500

170
Foreign Military Financing 

($ in thousands)

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total1 Actual Total2 FY 2011 CR3 FY 2012 

Request 

El Salvador - - * 1,250

 Guatemala - - * 500

 Guyana 400 400 * -

Haiti 1,600 1,600 * -

Honduras - - * 1,000

 Jamaica 700 700 * -

Mexico4 265,250 265,250 * 8,000

 Nicaragua - - * 400

 Panama - - * 1,840

 Paraguay 500 500 * 400

 Peru 2,490 2,490 * 2,800

 Suriname 400 400 * -

The Bahamas 150 150 * -

Trinidad and Tobago 400 400 * -

Uruguay 500 500 * 400

 Barbados and Eastern Caribbean 2,000 2,000 * -

Western Hemisphere Regional 21,500 21,500 * 24,000

 Central America Regional Security Initiative [7,000] [7,000] * -

Caribbean Basin Security Initiative [14,500] [14,500] * [24,000]

PM - Political-Military Affairs 54,464 54,464 * 62,800

Plus Overseas Contingency Operations -

Iraq -

- * 1,000,000

- * 1,000,000

SUBTOTAL Core + OCO 5,470,000 5,476,169 * 6,550,463

Plus Non-War Supplemental 50,000

Jordan 50,000

50,000 * -

50,000 * -

FMF Total 5,520,000 5,526,169 5,160,000 6,550,463

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-

117), supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), and includes forward funding from the 

Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322). 

4/ A total of $1.225 billion FMF in the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32) was designated as forward funding for FY 

2010 and is reflected in the FY 2010 Enacted Total and FY 2010 Actual Total. Forward funding was provided to Egypt ($260 million), 

Israel ($555 million), Jordan ($150 million), and Mexico ($260 million). 

5/ The FY 2010 Actual level reflects the transfer of $6.2 million from Economic Support Fund to Foreign Military Financing. 

171
International Organizations and Programs 

($ in thousands) 

FY 2010 

Enacted 

Total1 Actual Total2 FY 2011 CR3 FY 2012 

Request 

TOTAL (Enduring) 394,000 390,400 394,000 348,705

IO - International Organizations 394,000 390,400 * 348,705

 International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) 950 950 * 931

 International Development Law Organization (IDLO) 600 600 * 588

 International Maritime Organization (IMO) 400 400 * 392

 International Chemicals and Toxins Programs - - * 3,610

 International Conservation Programs 7,500 7,500 * 7,600

 International Panel on Climate Change / UN Framework 

Convention on Climate Change 13,000 13,000 * 13,500

 Montreal Protocol Multilateral Fund 25,500 25,500 * 29,232

 Multilateral Action Initiatives - - * 2,000

 OAS Development Assistance 5,000 5,000 * 4,750

 OAS Fund for Strengthening Democracy 3,000 3,000 * 2,940

 UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (UN 

OCHA) 3,000 3,000 * 2,940

 UN Voluntary Funds for Technical Cooperation in the Field of 

Human Rights 1,425 1,425 * 1,372

 UN Human Settlements Program (UN-HABITAT) 2,050 2,050 * 1,900

 UN Capital Development Fund (UNCDF) 625 625 * 950

 UN Democracy Fund (UNDF) 4,500 4,500 * 4,755

 UN Development Program (UNDP) 100,500 100,500 * 71,535

 UN Environment Program (UNEP) 11,500 11,500 * 7,700

 International Contributions for Scientific, Educational, and 

Cultural Activities (UNESCO/ICSECA) 1,000 1,000 * 980

 UN Population Fund (UNFPA)4 55,000 51,400 * 47,500

 UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (UNHCHR) 7,000 7,000 * -

UN Children's Fund (UNICEF) 132,250 132,250 * 126,600

 UNIFEM Trust Fund (UNIFEM) 3,000 3,000 * -

UN Women (formerly UNIFEM) 6,000 6,000 * 8,000

 UN Voluntary Fund for Victims of Torture (UNVFVT) 7,100 7,100 * 5,700

 World Meteorological Organization (WMO) 2,050 2,050 * 2,090

 WTO Technical Assistance 1,050 1,050 * 1,140

1/ FY 2010 Enacted Total reflects the allocations from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-117) as of May 2010, 

forward funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32), and supplemental funding from the Supplemental 

Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212). 

2/ FY 2010 Actual Total reflects the allocations as of September 30, 2010 from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-

117), supplemental funding from the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (P.L. 111-212), and includes forward funding from the 

Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (P.L. 111-32). 

3/ The FY 2011 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2011 (P.L. 111-322).

4/ The FY 2010 Actual level reflects the transfer of $3.6 million from International Organizations & Programs to Global Health and 

Child Survival-USAID. 

172