alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    Exhibit 24.1

                      POWER OF ATTORNEY OF HERBERT L. LUCAS


     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned, Herbert L. Lucas,
hereby constitutes and appoints William D. St. John or Steven H. Moger his true
and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, for him and his name, place and stead, in
any and all capacities, to sign the Registration Statement on Form S-8,
registering 2,982,000 shares of common stock of Nutraceutix, Inc., a Delaware
corporation, issuable upon exercise of options granted pursuant to the
Nutraceutix, Inc. 1995 Amended Stock Option Plan, and any amendments (including
post-effective amendments) or supplements thereto, and to file this Power of
Attorney and the Form S-8, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in
connection therewith with the Securities and Exchange Commission and any stock
exchange or similar authority, granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent
full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing
requisite or necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all
intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and
confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent may do or cause to be done
by virtue hereof.

     This Power of Attorney shall remain in full force and effect until revoked
by the undersigned in a signed writing delivered to the foregoing
attorney-in-fact.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Power of Attorney to be
executed this 24th day of May, 1999.


                                   /s/      Herbert L. Lucas
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   HERBERT L. LUCAS
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of

- )

)

Sauer Incorporated ) ASBCA No. 62395

)

Under Contract No. W91278

- 07

- D

- 0030 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT : Gina P. Grimsley, Esq.

Counsel

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Michael P. Goodman, Esq.

Engineer Chief Trial Attorney

Laura J. Arnett, Esq.

Engineer Trial Attorney

U.S. Army Engineer District, Savannah

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: July 11, 2022

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62395

, Appeal of Sauer

Incorporated , rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: July 12, 2022 DAVID B. STINSON

Administrative Judge

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           4,060
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,998
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,395
<PP&E>                                         131,965
<DEPRECIATION>                                  27,007
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 129,441
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,158
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            13
<OTHER-SE>                                      64,219
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   129,441
<SALES>                                         27,194
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,415
<CGS>                                            7,590
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,590
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,938
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,582
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,820
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,951
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,869
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,869
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.38


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                                         <C>               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                9-MOS             OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1999       Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1999       Jan-23-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1999       Dec-31-1998
<CASH>                                         2,000             2,000
<SECURITIES>                                   0                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0                 0
<INVENTORY>                                    0                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,000             2,000
<PP&E>                                         86,000            86,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 28,000            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 251,000           88,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          778,000           222,000
<BONDS>                                        0                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0                 0
<PREFERRED>                                    0                 0
<COMMON>                                       32,000            21,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     (559,000)         (155,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0                 0
<SALES>                                        0                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0                 0
<CGS>                                          0                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  901,000           328,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             186,000           0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0                 0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0                 0
<CHANGES>                                      0                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,087,000)       (328,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.41)             (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.41)             (.16)


</TABLE>
#### § 710.7 Inspection of registrations.

A copy of the Form FD-2511 filed by the registrant will be available for inspection at the Food and Drug Administration, 5001 Campus Dr., College Park, MD 20740.

[39 FR 10059, Mar. 15, 1974, as amended at 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 81 FR 49897, July 29, 2016]
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 771 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide for the secure storage 

of a licensed firearm possessed by a Federal judge, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2023 

Mr. COLE (for himself, Mr. HUDSON, Mr. CARTER of Texas, Mr. HERN, Mr. 

MCHENRY, Mr. NEWHOUSE, Mr. LUCAS, Ms. TENNEY, Mr. KELLY of 

Pennsylvania, and Mr. JACKSON of Texas) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition 

to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of 

such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide for the 

secure storage of a licensed firearm possessed by a Federal judge, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Firearm Lockbox Pro5 tection Act of 2023’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 771 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROVISION OF SECURE FIREARMS STORAGE FOR 

2 FEDERAL JUDGES. 

3 Section 462 of title 28, United States Code, is 

4 amended by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(g) Upon request of the Director, the Administrator 

6 of General Services is authorized and directed to provide, 

7 at the official duty station of each judge or justice, a se8 cure firearms storage facility for any firearm lawfully pos9 sessed by that judge or justice.’’. 

10 SEC. 3. PROVISION OF SECURE FIREARMS STORAGE FOR 

11 ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGES. 

12 Each agency that employs an administrative judge 

13 (including any administrative law judge appointed under 

14 section 3105 of title 5, United States Code) shall provide, 

15 at the principal duty station of that judge, a secure fire16 arms facility for any firearm lawfully possessed by that 

17 judge. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                              HARBINGER CORPORATION
                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES




          Harbinger NV
          Harbinger GmbH
          Harbinger Holdings BV
          Harbinger Computer Centrum, BV
          Harbinger Data Communications, BV
          Harbinger de Mexico, S de R.L. de C.V.
          Harbinger International s.r.l.
          Harbinger Corporation (Delaware)
          Harbinger Holdings, Inc.
          Harbinger SA (France)
          Harbinger Canada Corp.
          Prime Factors, Inc.
          Harbinger U.K.
§ 58.202 Grounds for disqualification. The Commissioner may disqualify a testing facility upon finding all of the following: ( a ) The testing facility failed to comply with one or more of the regulations set forth in this part (or any other regulations regarding such facilities in this chapter);
( b ) The noncompliance adversely affected the validity of the nonclinical laboratory studies; and
( c ) Other lesser regulatory actions (e.g., warnings or rejection of individual studies) have not been or will probably not be adequate to achieve compliance with the good laboratory practice regulations.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7484 

To require Members of Congress who are foreign nationals to file a statement 

of their status as a foreign national, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 29, 2024 

Mr. BURCHETT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To require Members of Congress who are foreign nationals 

to file a statement of their status as a foreign national, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Dual Citizenship Dis5 closure Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REQUIRING STATEMENT OF STATUS AS FOREIGN 

7 NATIONAL BY MEMBERS OF CONGRESS. 

8 (a) REQUIREMENT.—Not later than 90 days after 

9 taking the oath of office of a Member of Congress for a 

10 Congress, a Member who is a foreign national shall file 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 7484 IH

1 with the appropriate congressional ethics committee a 

2 statement describing the Member’s status as a foreign na3 tional. 

4 (b) EXCEPTION.—Subsection (a) does not apply with 

5 respect to a Member of Congress who filed a statement 

6 required under subsection (a) during a previous Congress. 

7 (c) PENALTY FOR NONCOMPLIANCE.—If a Member 

8 of Congress who is a foreign national fails to file the state9 ment required under subsection (a), or if the appropriate 

10 congressional ethics committee determines that the state11 ment is defective, the committee may impose a penalty on 

12 the Member of not more than $2,500, in addition to any 

13 other penalty applicable under the Rules of the House of 

14 Representatives or the Standing Rules of the Senate, as 

15 the case may be. 

16 (d) DEFINITIONS.— 

17 (1) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL ETHICS

18 COMMITTEE.—In this Act, the term ‘‘appropriate 

19 congressional ethics committee’’ means— 

20 (A) the Committee on Ethics of the House 

21 of Representatives, in the case of a Representa22 tive in, or Delegate or Resident Commissioner 

23 to, the Congress; and 

24 (B) the Select Committee on Ethics of the 

25 Senate, in the case of a Senator. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 7484 IH

1 (2) FOREIGN NATIONAL.—In this Act, term 

2 ‘‘foreign national’’ means a national of a foreign 

3 state, as such terms are defined in section 101 of 

4 the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

5 1101). 

6 (3) MEMBER OF CONGRESS.—In this Act, the 

7 term ‘‘Member of Congress’’ means a Senator or a 

8 Representative in, or Delegate or Resident Commis9 sioner to, the Congress. 

10 (e) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This Act shall apply with re11 spect to the One Hundred Nineteenth Congress and each 

12 succeeding Congress. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
§ 346.14 Protectant active ingredients. ( a ) The following active ingredients may be used as the sole protectant active ingredient in a product if the ingredient as identified constitutes 50 percent or more by weight of the final product. In addition, the following active ingredients may be used in concentrations of less than 50 percent by weight only when used in combinations in accordance with § 346.22 (a), (b), or (n). ( 1 ) Aluminum hydroxide gel.
( 2 ) Cocoa butter.
( 3 ) Glycerin in a 20- to 45-percent (weight/weight) aqueous solution so that the final product contains not less than 10 and not more than 45 percent glycerin (weight/weight). Any combination product containing glycerin must contain at least this minimum amount of glycerin.
( 4 ) Hard fat.
( 5 ) Kaolin.
( 6 ) Lanolin.
( 7 ) Mineral oil.
( 8 ) Petrolatum.
( 9 ) Topical starch.
( 10 ) White petrolatum.
( b ) The following active ingredients may not be used as a sole protectant ingredient but may be used in combination with one, two, or three other protectant active ingredients in accordance with § 346.22 (a), (b), (n), and (o) and with the following limitations: ( 1 ) Calamine not to exceed 25 percent by weight per dosage unit (based on the zinc oxide content of calamine).
( 2 ) Cod liver oil, provided that the product is labeled so that the amount of the product that is used in a 24-hour period represents a quantity that provides 10,000 U.S.P. units of vitamin A and 400 U.S.P. units of cholecalciferol.
( 3 ) Shark liver oil, provided that the product is labeled so that the amount of the product that is used in a 24-hour period represents a quantity that provides 10,000 U.S.P. units of vitamin A and 400 U.S.P. units of cholecalciferol.
( 4 ) Zinc oxide not to exceed 25 percent by weight per dosage unit.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 6658** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. TANESHA BANNISTER , Defendant

- Appellant
. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District o f South Carolina , at Columbia
. Cameron McGowan Currie , District Judge. ( 3:02

- cr - 00548

- CMC

- 40; 3:10

- cv - 70277

- CMC )

Submitted : February 17, 2012 Decided: February 23, 2012

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Vacated and remanded by u n published per curiam opinion
. Tanesha Bannister, Appellant Pro Se. Beth Drake, Mark C. Moore, Jane Barrett Taylor, Assistant United States Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circu it.2 PER CURIAM: Tanesha Bannister appeals the district court’ s order denying relief on her 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2011) motion, in which she asserted that counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to : (1) communicate a plea offer ; (2)

ex plain fully how relevant conduct and acceptance of responsibility would affect her case; and (3) explain fully the application of the 21 U.S.C. § 851 (2006) enhancement and how it would affect Bannister’s statutory mandatory minimum sentence
. We previousl y granted Bannister a certificate of appealability on th ese issue s . For the reasons that follow, we vacate and remand for further proceedings. Generally, an evidentiary hearing is required under
§ 2255 unless it is clear from the pleadings, files, and rec ords that a movant is not entitled to relief. United States v. Witherspoon , 231 F.3d 923, 925

- 27 (4th Cir. 2000); Raines v. United States , 423 F.2d 526, 529

- 30 (4th Cir. 1970). Whether an evidentiary hearing is necessary is best left to the sound discret ion of the district court. Raines , 423 F.2d at 530. However, when a movant presents a colorable Sixth Amendment claim showing disputed facts involving inconsistencies beyond the record, a hearing is mandated. See United States v. Magini , 973 F.2d 261, 2 64 (4th Cir. 1992); see also Raines , 423 F.2d at 530 (“There will remain
. . . a category of petitions, usually3 involving credibility, that will require an evidentiary hearing in open court.”).
Because whether counsel’s performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness turns on credibility determination s , and since it is not apparent, given the current state of the record, that Bannister suffered no prejudice if counsel’s performance was deficient, we vacate the district
court’ s order and reman d for further proceedings. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

VACATED AND REMANDED
**UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWASHINGTON, D.C. 20549**

----

**FORM 10-Q**

----

**[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002

OR
**[   ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THESECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**

Commission File Number 0-17589

**NTS-PROPERTIES VII, LTD.**

Incorporated pursuant to the Laws of the State of Florida

Internal Revenue Service - Employer Identification No. 61-1119232

10172 Linn Station Road, Louisville, Kentucky 40223

(502) 426-4800

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant  (1) has filed all reports  required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange  Act of 1934  during the  preceding  12 months (or for such  shorter  period  that the  registrant  was  required to file suchreports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.               Yes |X|      No  |   |

**TABLE OF CONTENTS**

**PART I**
Pages Item 1.Financial Statements Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2002 and December 31, 20013 Statement of Partners' Equity as of September 30, 20023 Statements of Operations for the Three Months and    Nine Months Ended September 30, 2002 and 20014  Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended    September 30, 2002 and 20015  Notes to Financial Statements6-11  Item 2.Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial    Condition and Results of Operations12-18  Item 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk18  Item 4.Controls and Procedures18
**PART II**
  Item 1.Legal Proceedings19  Item 2.Changes in Securities19  Item 3.Defaults Upon Senior Securities19  Item 4.Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders19  Item 5.Other Information19  Item 6.Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K19  Signatures20  Certifications21-22
2

**PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION**
# C_2016402EN.01002801.xml

| 31.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 402/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 402/28

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2016 — PT Musim Mas v Council

(Case T-80/14) (1)

1

((Dumping - Imports of biodiesel originating in Indonesia - Definitive collection of provisional anti-dumping duties - Definitive anti-dumping duties - Rights of the defence - Article 2(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 - Normal value - Production costs))

(2016/C 402/30)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: PT Perindustrian dan Perdagangan Musim Semi Mas (PT Musim Mas) (Medan, Indonesia) (represented by: J. García-Gallardo Gil-Fournier, A. Verdegay Mena, lawyers, and C. Humpe, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented initially by S. Boelaert, and subsequently by H. Marcos Fraile, acting as Agents, and by R. Bierwagen and C. Hipp, lawyers)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by J.-F. Brakeland, M. França and A. Stobiecka-Kuik, acting as Agents) and European Biodiesel Board (EBB) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by O. Prost and M.-S. Dibling, lawyers)

Interveners in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action pursuant to Article 263 TFUE for annulment of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1194/2013 of 19 November 2013 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of biodiesel originating in Argentina and Indonesia (OJ 2013 L 315, p. 2).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Articles 1 and 2 of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1194/2013 of 19 November 2013 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of biodiesel originating in Argentina and Indonesia, in so far as they concern PT Perindustrian dan Perdagangan Musim Semi Mas (PT Musim Mas); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Articles 1 and 2 of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1194/2013 of 19 November 2013 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of biodiesel originating in Argentina and Indonesia, in so far as they concern PT Perindustrian dan Perdagangan Musim Semi Mas (PT Musim Mas);

| 2. | Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by PT Musim Mas; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by PT Musim Mas;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission and the European Biodiesel Board (EBB) to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission and the European Biodiesel Board (EBB) to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 102, 7.4.2014.

1

---
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Learning demonstration progressreport [electronic resource].**
 
2007|2008|2010|
 
SuDoc Number:E 9.16/4:

Item Number:0430-P-22 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000624265

 
July 16, 2018