alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsReliability, Safety, and Performance for Two Aerospace Revolutions - UAS/ODM and Commercial Deep SpaceAerospace is in the midst of a renaissance, expanding on both the air and space side into major new commercial areas including unmanned air systems (UAS), on demand mobility (ODM), personal air vehicles (PAV), and commercial deep space. These new areas require, in the initial planning, consideration of new safety, reliability, and in some cases, enabling performance approaches for viability. For example, due to their huge numbers, if current accident rates prevail, UAS/ODM/PAV aircraft could crash at an unacceptable rate, causing life and property damage. Also, if humans in commercial space activities have serious health issues and/or there are unacceptable rocket viability issues/crash rates, these new, major markets (order of 1 trillion dollars per year) could be rapidly curtailed until agreeable and effective changes are instituted, producing additional expense, delay, and reduced revenue. This report addresses such safety and reliability issues and includes: performance enhancement possibilities such as an enabling Air Traffic Control System (ATC), crash proof vehicles, increased range for aero, space debris removal, and human health for space.Document ID20190025268Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsBushnell, Dennis M.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Moses, Robert W.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredMay 22, 2019Publication DateApril 1, 2019Subject CategoryAstronautics (General)Aeronautics (General)Report/Patent NumberNASA/TM-2019-220274NF1676L-32500L-21007Funding Number(s)WORK_UNIT: 736466.01.01.07.01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Technical ReviewSingle ExpertKeywordsCrash ProofHealth IssuesUAS (Unmanned Air Systems)AerospacePAV (Personal Air Vehicles)Available DownloadsNameType20190025268.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Order filed, July 27, 2016.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-16-00530-CV

____________

TRAFIGURA PTE. LTD., Appellant

V.

CNA METALS LIMITED, Appellee

On Appeal from the 434th Judicial District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 13-DCV-210802-B

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due July 18, 2016. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. 

The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not 

been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Karen Woolsey, the official court reporter, to file the record in this 

appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
§ 582.3733 Sodium benzoate. ( a ) *Product.* Sodium benzoate.
( b ) *Tolerance.* This substance is generally recognized as safe for use at a level not exceeding 0.1 percent in accordance with good manufacturing or feeding practice.
# C_2016106EN.01004702.xml

| 21.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/47

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 5 February 2016 — GV v EEAS

(Case F-137/14) (1)

1

((Civil service - EEAS staff - Member of the contract staff - Contract for an indefinite period - Article 47(c) of the CEOS - Reasons for dismissal - Breakdown in the relationship of trust - Right to be heard - Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Principle of sound administration - Material damage - Non-material damage))

(2016/C 106/57)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: GV (represented by: H. Tettenborn, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European External Action Service (represented by: S. Marquardt and M. Silva, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision of the EEAS terminating the applicant’s contract of employment for an indefinite period, and a claim for compensation for the material and non-material damage which the applicant claims to have suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of 29 January 2014 by which the Director of the ‘Human Resources’ Directorate of the European External Action Service, acting in his capacity as the authority authorised to conclude contracts of employment, decided to terminate GV’s employment contract with effect from 31 August 2014; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of 29 January 2014 by which the Director of the ‘Human Resources’ Directorate of the European External Action Service, acting in his capacity as the authority authorised to conclude contracts of employment, decided to terminate GV’s employment contract with effect from 31 August 2014;

| 2. | Orders the European External Action Service to pay GV the sum of EUR 5 000 by way of compensation for the non-material damage suffered; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European External Action Service to pay GV the sum of EUR 5 000 by way of compensation for the non-material damage suffered;

| 3. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 4. | Orders the European External Action Service to bear its own costs and to bear the costs incurred by GV. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the European External Action Service to bear its own costs and to bear the costs incurred by GV.

---

(1)  OJ C 34, 2.2.2015, p. 54.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-24-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-26-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-24-1999
<CASH>                                             603
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   97,304
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,423
<INVENTORY>                                      4,079
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                69,365
<PP&E>                                          16,325
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,492
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 166,333
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,262
<BONDS>                                         84,093
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,868
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   166,333
<SALES>                                         99,716
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,262
<CGS>                                           37,623
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  100,599
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,608
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 6,046
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,228
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,457)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,103)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,354)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  4,556
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,202
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>The Company does not report EPS as there is no public market for its equity.
</FN>


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-50131

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

SERGIO ROSAS-ERIVES, also known as Sergio Evives,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:09-CR-2742-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

Sergio Rosas-Erives (Rosas) appeals the sentence imposed following his

guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry following a previous removal. Rosas

argues that the district court’s written judgment of sentence conflicts with its

oral pronouncement of sentence. The Government agrees.

At the sentencing hearing, the district court imposed a supervised release

term of two years. However, the written judgment reflects a three-year term of

supervised release. Because the written judgment in this case conflicts with the

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 26, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-50131 Document: 00511216354 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/26/2010
No. 10-50131

oral pronouncement of judgment, the oral pronouncement controls. See United

States v. Mireles, 471 F.3d 551, 557-58 (5th Cir. 2006); United States v. Martinez,

250 F.3d 941, 942 (5th Cir. 2001). Accordingly, the case is remanded for the

district court to amend its written judgment to conform to its oral

pronouncement of sentence. See Mireles, 471 F.3d at 558; Martinez, 250 F.3d at

942.

The Government’s unopposed motion for amendment of the judgment to

modify the term of supervised release and for summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief is granted in part and denied in part. Given its position

in this case, the Government need not file an appellee’s brief. To the extent that

the Government requests that this court modify Rosas’s term of supervised

release without a remand to the district court to amend the written judgment,

the Government’s motion is denied. The Government’s alternative motion for an

extension of time to file an appellee’s brief is denied as moot.

REMANDED FOR AMENDMENT OF JUDGMENT AND AFFIRMED IN

ALL OTHER RESPECTS; MOTION TO AMEND JUDGMENT WITHOUT

REMAND DENIED; MOTION FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE GRANTED

EXCEPT AS TO MATTER REMANDED; MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

DENIED AS MOOT.

2

Case: 10-50131 Document: 00511216354 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/26/2010
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                                    FORM 8-K

                             CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT
                          TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                                February 28, 2003
                Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)

                            PAYLESS SHOESOURCE, INC.
             (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

                                    DELAWARE
                 (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)

            1-14770                                   43-1813160
    (Commission File Number)               (IRS Employer Identification No.)

                           3231 Southeast Sixth Avenue
                            Topeka, Kansas 66607-2207
               (Address of Principal Executive Office) (Zip Code)

                                 (785) 233-5171
              (Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

<PAGE>

Item 12. Disclosure of Results of Operations and Financial Condition.

      On February 28, 2003, Payless ShoeSource, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), issued a press release announcing its results for the fourth
quarter and full fiscal year ended February 1, 2003. The Company also announced
that its Board of Directors authorized a 3:1 split of the Company's common stock
in the form of a stock dividend payable on March 27, 2003 to shareowners of
record as of March 13, 2003. The full text of the press release is attached
hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated by reference herein.

(c) Exhibits.

    99.1 Press Release, dated February 28, 2003.

<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

      Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                             PAYLESS SHOESOURCE, INC.

Date: February 28, 2003                      By: /s/ Ullirch E. Porzig
                                                 ------------------------------
                                                 Ullrich E. Porzig
                                                 Senior Vice President
                                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                                 Treasurer

<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT INDEX

   Exhibit No.                 Exhibit
   -----------                 -------
      99.1                     Press Release, dated February 28, 2003.
§ 582.7610 Potassium alginate. ( a ) *Product.* Potassium alginate.
( b ) *Conditions of use.* This substance is generally recognized as safe when used in accordance with good manufacturing or feeding practice.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 39 (Monday, March 1, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 9140-9141]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4114]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2009-1100; Directorate Identifier 2009-NE-37-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64


Airworthiness Directives; International Aero Engines AG (IAE) 
V2500-A1, V2522-A5, V2524-A5, V2525-D5, V2527-A5, V2527E-A5, V2527M-A5, 
V2528-D5, V2530-A5, and V2533-A5 Turbofan Engines; Correction

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM); correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is correcting an NPRM, which published in the Federal 
Register. That NPRM applies to IAE V2500-A1, V2522-A5, V2524-A5, V2525-
D5, V2527-A5, V2527E-A5, V2527M-A5, V2528-D5, V2530-A5, and V2533-A5 
turbofan engines. The docket number is incorrect in three locations. 
This document corrects the docket number in those three locations. In 
all other respects, the original document remains the same.

DATES: The NPRM is corrected as of March 1, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin Dickert, Aerospace Engineer, 
Engine Certification Office, FAA, 12 New England Executive Park, 
Burlington, MA 01803; e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#83e8e6f5eaedade7eae0e8e6f1f7c3e5e2e2ade4ecf5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6e050b180700400a070d050b1c1a2e080f0f40090118">[email protected]</span></a>; phone: (781) 238-
7117, fax: (781) 238-7199.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On February 12, 2010 (75 FR 6860), we 
published a proposed AD, FR Doc. 2010-2999, in the Federal Register. 
That AD applies to IAE V2500-A1, V2522-A5, V2524-A5, V2525-D5, V2527-
A5, V2527E-A5, V2527M-A5, V2528-D5, V2530-A5, and V2533-A5 turbofan 
engines. We need to make the following corrections:


Sec.  39.13  [Corrected]

    On page 6860, in the first column, under 14 CFR Part 39, ``Docket 
No.

[[Page 9141]]

FAA-2009-0544'' is corrected to read ``Docket No. FAA-2009-1100''.
    On page 6860, in the second column, under Comments Invited, in the 
fifth and sixth line, ``Docket No. FAA-2009-0544'' is corrected to read 
``Docket No. FAA-2009-1100''.
    On page 6861, in the third column, after International Aero Engines 
AG, ``Docket No. FAA-2009-0544'' is corrected to read ``Docket No. FAA-
2009-1100''.

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on February 19, 2010.
Francis A. Favara,
Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-4114 Filed 2-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2018328EN.01003802.xml

| 17.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/38

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2018 — Sumitomo Electric Industries and J-Power Systems v Commission

(Case T-450/14) (1)

((Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - European market for power cables - Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU - Single and continuous infringement - Proof of the infringement - Duration of participation - Public distancing - Calculation of the fine - Gravity of the infringement - Unlimited jurisdiction))

(2018/C 328/52)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Sumitomo Electric Industries Ltd (Osaka, Japan) and J-Power Systems Corp. (Tokyo, Japan) (represented by M. Hansen, L. Crocco, J. Ruiz Calzado and S. Völcker, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by C. Giolito, H. van Vliet and J. Norris-Usher, acting as Agents, and by M. Gray, Barrister)

Re:

Action pursuant to Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Decision C(2014) 2139 final of 2 April 2014 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 [TFEU] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case AT.39610 — Power cables) in so far as it concerns the applicants and, in the alternative, an application for a reduction in the amount of the fine imposed on the applicants in that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Sumitomo Electric Industries Ltd and J-Power Systems Corp. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Sumitomo Electric Industries Ltd and J-Power Systems Corp. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 303, 8.9.2014.

---
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 39 (Monday, March 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9188-9189]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4190]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Notice of Cancellation of Open Meeting of the Chief of Naval 
Operations (CNO) Executive Panel

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of cancellation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy published a document in the Federal 
Register (75 FR 7453) of February 19, 2010, announcing The CNO 
Executive Panel was scheduled to meet on March 11, 2010, to deliberate 
on the findings and proposed recommendations of the Subcommittee on 
Improved Concept Generation Development. The meeting has been canceled.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The canceled meeting was scheduled to be 
held on March 11, 2010, at 9 a.m. in the Boardroom, CNA, 4825 Mark 
Center Drive, Alexandria, VA 22311-1846. The matters to be discussed 
included: Navy's concept generation and concept development processes 
and procedures.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Bree A. Hartlage, CNO Executive 
Panel, 4825 Mark Center Drive, Alexandria, VA 22311-1846, 703-681-4907.


[[Page 9189]]


    Dated: February 23, 2010.
A.M. Vallandingam,
Lieutenant Commander, Office of the Judge Advocate General, U.S. Navy, 
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-4190 Filed 2-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
# C_2015311EN.01001401.xml

| 21.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/14

---

Appeal brought on 23 December 2014 by Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd against the order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 21 October 2014 in Case T-374/14: Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd v European Commission

(Case C-602/14 P)

(2015/C 311/17)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd (represented by: A. Mc Donagh, avocat)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Other party to the proceedings:

By order of 4 June 2015 the Court of Justice (Sixth Chamber) has dismissed the appeal and ordered Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd to bear its own costs.

---
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.1
Description of Compensation of Directors


Each director not employed by First Data Corporation (FDC) or affiliates of Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. L.P. (KKR) receives the following compensation:


		
	•
	An annual award , of common stock valued at $150,000 based on the closing price of FDC common stock on the date of grant. Grants are made in connection with each FDC Annual Shareholder Meeting.




		
	•
	An annual retainer of $85,000 to be paid in quarterly installments on the first business day of each quarter.




Each non-employee director associated with KKR receives an annual cash retainer of $40,000, payable in semi-annual installments on the first business day of January and July of each year. 


Each Committee Chairperson determined by the Board to be an independent director receives an annual retainer of $25,000, payable in quarterly installments on the first business day of each calendar quarter. 


All cash compensation may be deferred under the First Data 2008 Non-Employee Director Deferred Compensation Plan at the election of each director.  All amounts deferred will accrue earnings based on the performance of First Data’s Class A common stock and are paid to the director upon termination of the director’s service, subject to acceleration of the payout under certain circumstances.