alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### People of the State of Illinois, ex rel. Glen E. Totten, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Honorable Paul Powell, Secretary of State of Illinois, Defendant-Appellee.

Gen. No. 69-27.

Fifth District.

March 14, 1969.

Glen E. Totten, pro se, of Pontiac, appellant.

No brief for appellee.

*54PER CURIAM:

Petitioner, Glen E. Totten, an inmate of the Illinois State Reformatory at Pontiac, filed, pro se, a petition for writ of mandamus directing Honorable Paul Powell, Secretary of State, to furnish him with certain documents allegedly on file in his office. Upon motion of the State’s Attorney of Wayne County, the circuit court dismissed the petition on the ground that it was without jurisdiction to adjudicate the matter.

Petitioner appealed to the Supreme Court and filed a brief, pro se, arguing a number of constitutional issues. The Supreme Court, on its own motion, on the ground that the circuit court had not ruled on any constitutional question, transferred the cause to this court.

Upon examination of the record this court holds that petitioner is a “poor person” within the contemplation of chapter 33, section 5, Ill Rev Stats 1967, and may proceed without payment of costs. Petitioner has not requested assignment of counsel, and at this stage of the proceedings, assignment of counsel does not appear to be necessary.

The record does not reflect that summons was requested or issued, nor that service was had upon the defendant, Secretary of State, and it cannot be ascertained whether the State’s Attorney appeared solely in that capacity, or as counsel designated to act for the defendant.

In any event, the circuit court erred in holding that it was without jurisdiction. Under the provisions of article VI, section 9 of the Constitution of Illinois, the court has jurisdiction.

The matter of venue presents an entirely different question. The Civil Practice Act (c 110, Ill Rev Stats) applies to actions in mandamus. C 87, § 11, Ill Rev Stats 1967. Venue lies in the county of which the defendant is a resident (c 110, § 5, Ill Rev Stats) and article V, section 1 of the Constitution provides that the Secretary *55of State shall reside “at the seat of government” which is in Springfield, in Sangamon County. C 123, § 1, Ill Rev Stats 1967.

As to whether the defendant, after proper service of summons, will elect to effect a change of venue under the provisions of section 8 of the Civil Practice Act does not concern us at this time, nor need we speculate as to the merits of petitioner’s action. The sole question before us now, is whether the circuit court was without jurisdiction to hear the case.

For the reasons set forth, the judgment of dismissal is reversed and the cause remanded to the Circuit Court of Wayne County with directions to vacate the order of dismissal, and for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded with directions.
Exhibit 21

                           Subsidiaries of Registrant


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>



                                            Percentage      Jurisdiction or
Subsidiary (1)                                Owned      State of Incorporation
------------------------------------------  ----------   ----------------------

Klamath First Federal Savings
<S>                                             <C>           <C>
  and Loan Association                          100%          United States

Klamath First Capital Trust I                   100%          Oregon

Klamath First Capital Trust II                  100%          Oregon

Klamath First Financial Services, Inc. (2)      100%          Oregon

Pacific Cascades Financial, Inc. (2)            100%          Oregon
<FN>


(1)  The  operations of the Company's  subsidiary  are included in the Company's
     consolidated financial statements.

(2)  Wholly-owned   subsidiary  of  Klamath  First  Federal   Savings  and  Loan
     Association
</FN>
</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Economics and Statistics Administration

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Economic Analysis.

# ACTION:

Notice of public meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463 as amended by Pub. L. 94-409, Pub. L. 96-523, Pub. L. 97-375 and Pub. L. 105-153), we are announcing a meeting of the Bureau of Economic Analysis Advisory Committee. The meeting will address ways in which the national economic accounts can be presented more effectively for current economic analysis and recent statistical developments in national accounting.

# DATES:

Friday, May 7, 2010, the meeting will begin at 9 a.m. and adjourn at 3:30 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will take place at the Bureau of Economic Analysis at 1441 L St., NW., Washington DC.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jeffrey Newman, Media and Outreach Lead, Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC 20230; telephone number: (202) 606-9265.

*Public Participation:*                         This meeting is open to the public. Because of security procedures, anyone planning to attend the meeting must contact Jeffrey Newman of BEA at (202) 606-9265 in advance. The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. Requests for foreign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids should be directed to Jeffrey Newman at (202) 606-9265.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Committee was established September 2, 1999. The Committee advises the Director of BEA on matters related to the development and improvement of BEA's national, regional, industry, and international economic accounts, especially in areas of new and rapidly growing economic activities arising from innovative and advancing technologies, and provides recommendations from the perspectives of the economics profession, business, and government. This will be the Committee's twenty-first meeting.

Dated: February 5, 2010.

Brian C. Moyer,

Acting Deputy Director, Bureau of Economic Analysis.

[FR Doc. 2010-3985 Filed 2-25-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-06-P
#### People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jack A. Kent, Defendant-Appellant.

Gen. No. 53,275. (Abstract of Decision.)

First District, Second Division.

May 27, 1969.

Rehearing denied June 17, 1969.

Eichard James Stevens, William J. Stevens, Tenney, Bentley, Guthrie, Askow & Howell, of Chicago, for appellant;

Edward V. Hanrahan, State’s Attorney of Cook County, of Chicago (Elmer C. Kissane and Michael D. Stevenson, Assistant State’s Attorneys, of counsel), for appellee.

Opinion by

ME. JUSTICE McCOEMICK.

Not to be published in full.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

Each of the undersigned officers of Spescom Software Inc. (the“Company”) hereby certifies to his knowledge that the Company’s quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 (the “Report”), asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Thiscertification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, andshall not be deemed to be a part of the Report or “filed” for any purposewhatsoever.

 
| Dated:  May 15, 2006 |
|--------------------------------|
|                           |
| /s/ Keith Stentiford           |   |
|                           |
| Keith Stentiford               |
| Chief Executive Officer        |

 

 
| Dated:  May 15, 2006 |
|--------------------------------|
|                           |
| /s/ John W. Low                |   |
|                           |
| John W. Low                    |
| Chief Financial Officer        |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to Spescom Software Inc. and will be retained by Spescom SoftwareInc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Ambassadors International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Hans Birkholz, hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Hans Birkholz


Hans Birkholz


Chief Executive Officer


April 20, 2011





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany this Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Factory 2-U Stores, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarter ended August 2, 2003, as filed with the
Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas C.
Felderman, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     aspects,  the financial  condition of the Company as of the dates indicated
     and result of operations of the Company for the periods indicated.




                                             /s/ Douglas C. Felderman
                                             ------------------------
                                             Douglas C. Felderman
                                             Executive Vice President and
                                             Chief Financial Officer
                                             September 16, 2003
EXHIBIT 32
----------




                         CERTIFICATIONS OF
        CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                    SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
        ---------------------------------------------------



     The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2009,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be
deemed filed pursuant to any provision of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 or any other securities law:

     Each of the undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on
Form 10-Q/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information
contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of ALP Liquidating Trust.




                                     /s/   Gary Nickele
                                     ------------------------------
                                     Gary Nickele
                                     Chief Executive Officer




                                     /s/   Gailen J. Hull
                                     ------------------------------
                                     Gailen J. Hull
                                     Chief Financial Officer and
                                     Principal Accounting Officer
§ 582.1619 Potassium carbonate. ( a ) *Product.* Potassium carbonate.
( b ) *Conditions of use.* This substance is generally recognized as safe when used in accordance with good manufacturing or feeding practice.
# C_2015073EN.01001001.xml

| 2.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 73/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 73/10

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Rüsselsheim (Germany) lodged on 14 November 2014 — Marianne Parigger v Condor Flugdienst GmbH

(Case C-510/14)

(2015/C 073/14)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht Rüsselsheim

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Marianne Parigger

Defendant: Condor Flugdienst GmbH

The case was removed from the Register of the Court of Justice by order of the Court of 9 December 2014.

---
Reserve RD

Quemado RD

Reserve RD

Glenwood RD

Quemado RD

Glenwood RD

Quemado R

D

Spr ni gerville R

D

Green el e County

Catron County Catron County

Apache County

Lower San

Francisco

Plaza

Luna

Reserve

San

Francisco

Plaza

Arizona

New

Mex ci o

Luna Planning Area

Luna (185,586 ac.)

! City/Town

National Forest Boundary

County Boundary

Ranger District Boundary

Private Ownership

Luna Planning Area Fire Potential

Fire Type (% Area)

No Fire (3%)

Surface Fire (29%)

Torching/Passive Crown Fire (48%)

Active Crown Fire (20%)

LUNA RESTORATION PROJECT: FIGURE 2

0 1 2 4

Miles

Created On: 5/11/2016 1:14:46 PM

Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 12NTransverse Mercator

o 1 in = 2 miles

1:125,000

(printed on 11" x 17" portrait layout)

Created By: jjelacic

The USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender

Figure 2: Fire potential within the

planning area displaying the

areas of potential surface fire and

torching/passive and active
# C_2014184EN.01004501.xml

| 16.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 184/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 184/45

---

Action brought on 29 March 2014 — ZZ and Others v Parliament

(Case F-31/14)

2014/C 184/75

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: ZZ and Others (represented by: A. Salerno, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Parliament

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the elections for the Staff Committee of the European Parliament which took place in autumn 2013, the results of which were published on 28 November 2013.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | annul the results of the elections for the Staff Committee of the European Parliament which took place in autumn 2013, the results of which were officially published on 28 November 2013; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the results of the elections for the Staff Committee of the European Parliament which took place in autumn 2013, the results of which were officially published on 28 November 2013;

| — | order the Parliament to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Parliament to pay the costs.

---
---

EXHIBIT 13.B


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with Annual Report of Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal period ended May 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Julie van Baarsen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge: 3.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and4.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materials respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Julie van Baarsen 
    Julie van Baarsen
    (principal financial and accounting officer) 
    Dated: August 30, 2010
§ 556.735 Tilmicosin. ( a ) *Acceptable daily intake (ADI).* The ADI for total residue of tilmicosin is 25 μg/kg of body weight per day.
( b ) *Tolerances.* The tolerances for tilmicosin (marker residue) are: ( 1 ) *Cattle.* ( i ) Liver (target tissue): 1.2 ppm.
( ii ) Muscle: 0.1 ppm.
( 2 ) *Sheep.* ( i ) Liver (target tissue): 1.2 ppm.
( ii ) Muscle: 0.1 ppm.
( 3 ) *Swine.* ( i ) Liver (target tissue): 7.5 ppm.
( ii ) Muscle: 0.1 ppm.
( c ) *Related conditions of use.* See §§ 520.2471, 522.2471, and 558.618 of this chapter.
§ 529.2110 Sevoflurane. ( a ) *Specifications.* Sevoflurane liquid.
( b ) *Sponsors.* See Nos. 017033, 054771, and 065085 in § 510.600(c) of this chapter.
( c ) *Conditions of use* — ( 1 ) *Amount.* For induction of surgical anesthesia: up to 7 percent sevoflurane. For maintenance of surgical anesthesia: 3.7 to 4 percent sevoflurane with oxygen in the absence of premedication and 3.3 to 3.6 percent in the presence of premedication.
( 2 ) *Indications for use.* For induction and maintenance of general anesthesia in dogs.
( 3 ) *Limitations.* Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian.
[64 FR 71640, Dec. 22, 1999, as amended at 73 FR 25508, May 7, 2008; 74 FR 10484, Mar. 11, 2009, 75 FR 1021, Jan. 8, 2010; 76 FR 16533, Mar. 24, 2011; 78 FR 17868, Mar. 25, 2013; 80 FR 18776, Apr. 8, 2015. Redesignated at 86 FR 13188, Mar. 8, 2021, as amended at 87 FR 58963, Sept. 29, 2022; 89 FR 42360, May 15, 2024]
#### § 520.903 Febantel oral dosage forms.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 2 (Tuesday, January 4, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 396]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-33148]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail--Non-Published Rates

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Postal Service notice of filing of a request with the Postal 
Regulatory Commission to add a new product to the Mail Classification 
Schedule's Competitive Products List pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 
3632(b)(3).

DATES: January 4, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[reg] hereby 
gives notice that on December 17, 2010, it filed with the Postal 
Regulatory Commission a Request of the United States Postal Service 
Concerning Priority Mail--Non-Published Rates and Notice of Filing 
Materials Under Seal. Documents are available at http://www.prc.gov, 
Docket Nos. MC2011-15 and CP2011-51.

Neva R. Watson,
Attorney, Legislative.
[FR Doc. 2010-33148 Filed 1-3-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Editorial Note on Part 184
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 184 appear at 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; and 81 FR 49897, July 29, 2016.

§ 184.1033 Citric acid. ( a ) Citric acid (C6H8O7, CAS Reg. No. 77-92-9) is the compound 2-hydroxy-1,2,3-propanetricarboxylic acid. It is a naturally occurring constituent of plant and animal tissues. It occurs as colorless crystals or a white powder and may be anhydrous or contain one mole of water per mole of citric acid. Citric acid may be produced by recovery from sources such as lemon or pineapple juice; by mycological fermentation using *Candida spp.*, described in §§ 173.160 and 173.165 of this chapter; and by the solvent extraction process described in § 173.280 of this chapter for the recovery of citric acid from *Aspergillus niger* fermentation liquor.
( b ) The ingredient meets the specifications of the Food Chemicals Codex, 3d ed. (1981), pp. 86-87, and its third supplement (March 1992), pp. 107-108, which are incorporated by reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies are available from the National Academy Press, 2101 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20418, and the Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-200), 5001 Campus Dr., College Park, MD 20740, or may be examined at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .*
( c ) In accordance with § 184.1(b)(1), the ingredient is used in food with no limitations other than current good manufacturing practice.
( d ) Prior sanctions for this ingredient different from the uses established in this section do not exist or have been waived.
[59 FR 63895, Dec. 12, 1994]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DANTAE JACQUES,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 581 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 14th day of April, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.