89–008 

116TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 116–111 

PROVIDING FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION OF THE BILL (H.R. 2740) MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE DEPARTMENTS OF LABOR, HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES, AND EDUCATION, AND RELATED AGENCIES FOR THE 

FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2020, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES 

JUNE 11, 2019.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mrs. TORRES of California, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 436] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 436, by a record vote of 8 to 4, report the same to the 

House with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides a structured rule for further consideration of H.R. 2740, the Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, Defense, State, Foreign Operations, and Energy and Water 

Development Appropriations Act, 2020. The resolution provides no 

further general debate. The resolution provides that no further 

amendment to the bill, as amended, shall be in order except those 

printed in this report, amendments en bloc described in section 3 

of this resolution, and available pro forma amendments described 

in section 4 of House Resolution 431. Each amendment printed in 

part A of this report may be offered only in the order printed in 

the report, may be offered only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time 

specified in the report equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, may be withdrawn by the proponent at 

any time before action thereon, shall not be subject to amendment 

except pro forma amendments described in section 4 of House Resolution 431, and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the 

question in the House or in the Committee of the Whole. Each 

amendment printed in part B of this report may be offered at any 

time during the consideration of the bill for amendment, may be offered only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the report 

equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, 

may be withdrawn by the proponent at any time before action 

2 

thereon, shall not be subject to amendment except amendments described in section 4 of House Resolution 431, and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question in the House or in the 

Committee of the Whole. The resolution waives all points of order 

against further amendments printed in this report or against 

amendments en bloc described in section 3 of the resolution. The 

resolution provides that it shall be in order at any time for the 

chair of the Committee on Appropriations or her designee to offer 

amendments en bloc consisting of further amendments printed in 

this report not earlier disposed of. Amendments en bloc shall be 

considered as read, shall be debatable for 20 minutes equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of 

the Committee on Appropriations or their respective designees, 

shall not be subject to amendment except amendments described in 

section 4 of House Resolution 431, and shall not be subject to demand for division of the question in the House or in the Committee 

of the Whole. The resolution provides one motion to recommit with 

or without instructions. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

The waiver of all points of order against amendments to H.R. 

2740 includes a waiver of Clause 2(c) of rule XXI, which requires 

that limitation amendments be offered at the end of the bill. The 

waiver is necessary because the limitation amendments printed in 

this report will be offered at the end of each division. It should be 

noted that sponsors of such amendments complied with Rules Committee guidance when drafting amendments to the end of divisions 

rather than the end of the bill. 

COMMITTEE VOTES

The results of each record vote on an amendment or motion to 

report, together with the names of those voting for and against, are 

printed below: 

Rules Committee record vote No. 112 

Motion by Mr. Cole to amend the rule to Division A of H.R. 2740 

to make in order amendment #179, offered by Rep. Duffy (WI), 

which increases funding for the Refugee and Entrant Assistance 

Account by $2.8 billion to allow the Office of Refugee Resettlement 

to provide all Unaccompanied Alien Children (UAC) with critical 

child welfare services and high-quality shelter care. Defeated: 4–7 

Majority Members Vote Minority Members Vote 

Mr. Hastings ..................................................... ................... Mr. Cole ........................................................... Yea 

Mrs. Torres ....................................................... Nay Mr. Woodall ...................................................... Yea 

Mr. Perlmutter .................................................. ................... Mr. Burgess ..................................................... Yea 

Mr. Raskin ........................................................ Nay Mrs. Lesko ........................................................ Yea 

Ms. Scanlon ...................................................... Nay 

Mr. Morelle ....................................................... Nay 

Ms. Shalala ...................................................... Nay 

Mr. DeSaulnier .................................................. Nay 

Mr. McGovern, Chairman ................................. Nay 

Rules Committee record vote No. 113 

Motion by Mr. Cole to amend the rule to Division E of H.R. 2740 

to make in order and provide the appropriate waivers to amendVerDate Sep 11 2014 08:56 Jun 12, 2019 Jkt 089008 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\HR111.XXX HR111
3 

ment #66, offered by Rep. Shimkus (IL), which provides funding for 

the Department of Energy and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission 

to carry out nuclear waste disposal activities under Title I of the 

Nuclear Waste Policy Act. Defeated: 4–7 

Majority Members Vote Minority Members Vote 

Mr. Hastings ..................................................... ................... Mr. Cole ........................................................... Yea 

Mrs. Torres ....................................................... Nay Mr. Woodall ...................................................... Yea 

Mr. Perlmutter .................................................. ................... Mr. Burgess ..................................................... Yea 

Mr. Raskin ........................................................ Nay Mrs. Lesko ........................................................ Yea 

Ms. Scanlon ...................................................... Nay 

Mr. Morelle ....................................................... Nay 

Ms. Shalala ...................................................... Nay 

Mr. DeSaulnier .................................................. Nay 

Mr. McGovern, Chairman ................................. Nay 

Rules Committee record vote No. 114 

Motion by Mr. Woodall to amend the rule to Division D of H.R. 

2740 to make in order and provide the appropriate waivers to 

amendment #9, offered by Rep. Zeldin (NY), which ensures that 

foreign aid does not support NGOs that participate in the BDS 

campaign against Israel. Defeated: 4–7 

Majority Members Vote Minority Members Vote 

Mr. Hastings ..................................................... ................... Mr. Cole ........................................................... Yea 

Mrs. Torres ....................................................... Nay Mr. Woodall ...................................................... Yea 

Mr. Perlmutter .................................................. ................... Mr. Burgess ..................................................... Yea 

Mr. Raskin ........................................................ Nay Mrs. Lesko ........................................................ Yea 

Ms. Scanlon ...................................................... Nay 

Mr. Morelle ....................................................... Nay 

Ms. Shalala ...................................................... Nay 

Mr. DeSaulnier .................................................. Nay 

Mr. McGovern, Chairman ................................. Nay 

Rules Committee record vote No. 115 

Motion by Mr. Woodall to amend the rule to Division A of H.R. 

2740 to make in order amendment #4, offered by Rep. Davis (IL), 

which prevents any funds in this bill from being used to limit access to health care for anyone with a preexisting medical condition. 

Defeated: 4–8 

Majority Members Vote Minority Members Vote 

Mr. Hastings ..................................................... ................... Mr. Cole ........................................................... Yea 

Mrs. Torres ....................................................... Nay Mr. Woodall ...................................................... Yea 

Mr. Perlmutter .................................................. Nay Mr. Burgess ..................................................... Yea 

Mr. Raskin ........................................................ Nay Mrs. Lesko ........................................................ Yea 

Ms. Scanlon ...................................................... Nay 

Mr. Morelle ....................................................... Nay 

Ms. Shalala ...................................................... Nay 

Mr. DeSaulnier .................................................. Nay 

Mr. McGovern, Chairman ................................. Nay 

Rules Committee record vote No. 116 

Motion by Mr. Burgess to amend the rule to Division C of H.R. 

2740 to make in order and provide the appropriate waivers to 

amendment #7, offered by Rep. Burgess (TX), which strikes Section 

8127 in Division C that prohibits any funding being used to construct a border wall along the southern border. Defeated: 4–8 

4 

Majority Members Vote Minority Members Vote 

Mr. Hastings ..................................................... ................... Mr. Cole ........................................................... Yea 

Mrs. Torres ....................................................... Nay Mr. Woodall ...................................................... Yea 

Mr. Perlmutter .................................................. Nay Mr. Burgess ..................................................... Yea 

Mr. Raskin ........................................................ Nay Mrs. Lesko ........................................................ Yea 

Ms. Scanlon ...................................................... Nay 

Mr. Morelle ....................................................... Nay 

Ms. Shalala ...................................................... Nay 

Mr. DeSaulnier .................................................. Nay 

Mr. McGovern, Chairman ................................. Nay 

Rules Committee record vote No. 117 

Motion by Mr. Burgess to amend the rule to Division D of H.R. 

2740 to make in order the following amendments: amendment #3, 

offered by Rep. Burgess (TX), which reduces funding for El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras by an amount equal to the number of unaccompanied alien children from each country placed in 

federal custody in the preceding fiscal year due to their immigration status multiplied by $30,000; and amendment #41, offered by 

Rep. Burgess (TX), which directs not less than 50% of reprogrammable assistance for the Northern Triangle countries be available 

to NGOs in El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras that are providing services directly benefiting the residents of those countries. 

Defeated: 4–8 

Majority Members Vote Minority Members Vote 

Mr. Hastings ..................................................... ................... Mr. Cole ........................................................... Yea 

Mrs. Torres ....................................................... Nay Mr. Woodall ...................................................... Yea 

Mr. Perlmutter .................................................. Nay Mr. Burgess ..................................................... Yea 

Mr. Raskin ........................................................ Nay Mrs. Lesko ........................................................ Yea 

Ms. Scanlon ...................................................... Nay 

Mr. Morelle ....................................................... Nay 

Ms. Shalala ...................................................... Nay 

Mr. DeSaulnier .................................................. Nay 

Mr. McGovern, Chairman ................................. Nay 

Rules Committee record vote No. 118 

Motion by Mrs. Lesko to amend the rule to Division E of H.R. 

2740 to make in order and provide the appropriate waivers to 

amendment #99, offered by Rep. Lesko (AZ), which increases funding for Nuclear Energy by $8,282,000, offset with a reduction from 

Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Defeated: 4–8 

Majority Members Vote Minority Members Vote 

Mr. Hastings ..................................................... ................... Mr. Cole ........................................................... Yea 

Mrs. Torres ....................................................... Nay Mr. Woodall ...................................................... Yea 

Mr. Perlmutter .................................................. Nay Mr. Burgess ..................................................... Yea 

Mr. Raskin ........................................................ Nay Mrs. Lesko ........................................................ Yea 

Ms. Scanlon ...................................................... Nay 

Mr. Morelle ....................................................... Nay 

Ms. Shalala ...................................................... Nay 

Mr. DeSaulnier .................................................. Nay 

Mr. McGovern, Chairman ................................. Nay 

Rules Committee record vote No. 119 

Motion by Mrs. Lesko to amend the rule to Division D of H.R. 

2740 to make in order amendment #58, offered by Rep. Foxx (NC), 

which prohibits funds from being provided to assist in the invesVerDate Sep 11 2014 08:56 Jun 12, 2019 Jkt 089008 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\HR111.XXX HR111
5 

tigation, arrest, detention, extradition, or prosecution by the International Criminal Court of any Israeli citizen or permanent resident of Israel (as Israel is not party to the Rome Statute). Defeated: 4–8 

Majority Members Vote Minority Members Vote 

Mr. Hastings ..................................................... ................... Mr. Cole ........................................................... Yea 

Mrs. Torres ....................................................... Nay Mr. Woodall ...................................................... Yea 

Mr. Perlmutter .................................................. Nay Mr. Burgess ..................................................... Yea 

Mr. Raskin ........................................................ Nay Mrs. Lesko ........................................................ Yea 

Ms. Scanlon ...................................................... Nay 

Mr. Morelle ....................................................... Nay 

Ms. Shalala ...................................................... Nay 

Mr. DeSaulnier .................................................. Nay 

Mr. McGovern, Chairman ................................. Nay 

Rules Committee record vote No. 120 

Motion by Mrs. Torres to report the rule. Adopted: 8–4 

Majority Members Vote Minority Members Vote 

Mr. Hastings ..................................................... ................... Mr. Cole ........................................................... Nay 

Mrs. Torres ....................................................... Yea Mr. Woodall ...................................................... Nay 

Mr. Perlmutter .................................................. Yea Mr. Burgess ..................................................... Nay 

Mr. Raskin ........................................................ Yea Mrs. Lesko ........................................................ Nay 

Ms. Scanlon ...................................................... Yea 

Mr. Morelle ....................................................... Yea 

Ms. Shalala ...................................................... Yea 

Mr. DeSaulnier .................................................. Yea 

Mr. McGovern, Chairman ................................. Yea 

SUMMARY OF THE AMENDMENTS IN PART A MADE IN ORDER

AMENDMENTS TO DIVISION D (STATE, FOREIGN OPERATIONS, AND

RELATED PROGRAMS) MADE IN ORDER

1. Bost (IL): Ensures that when the State Department is expanding opportunities for grants and contracts to small businesses 

owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged 

and faith-based organizations, it also does so for veteran and service-disabled veteran owned small businesses. (10 minutes) 

2. Kildee (MI): Increases funding by $500,000 for the Great 

Lakes Fisheries Commission to address grass carp. (10 minutes) 

3. Rouda (CA), Correa (CA), Lofgren (CA), Lowenthal (CA): Prohibits the use of funds to negotiate or enter into an agreement with 

Vietnam for the repatriation of Vietnamese immigrants who arrived in the United States before July 12, 1995. (10 minutes) 

4. Sherman (CA): Increases funding for the United States Agency 

for Global Media International Broadcasting Operations account by 

$1.5 million, to broadcast Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty in the 

Sindhi language in Pakistan, and decreases funding by $2.1 million 

in the Capital Investment Fund account. (10 minutes) 

5. Allen (GA): Reduces spending in Division D by 1 percent. (10 

minutes) 

6 

AMENDMENTS TO DIVISION C (DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE) MADE IN

ORDER

6. Stewart (UT): Ensures that military working dogs are returned to the United States upon completion of their service to our 

soldiers abroad. (10 minutes) 

7. Young (AK): Reduces the Defense Wide Operations and Maintenance Account by $8,500,000 and increases the Air Force Operations and Maintenance account by the same amount, for the ISR 

Innovation Office to support Mission Defense Teams. (10 minutes) 

8. Engel (NY), McCaul (TX): Strikes Section 9015 to enable the 

use of funds for additional defensive military equipment to 

Ukraine. (10 minutes) 

9. Smith, Christopher (NJ): Redirects $2 million from Operations 

and Maintenance, Defense-Wide to the Congressionally Directed 

Medical Research Programs for Tickborne Disease research. (10 

minutes) 

10. Eshoo (CA): Increases and decreases the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force account by $9.5 million in 

order to develop flexible imaging technologies, wearable biochemical sensing, point-of-care in low-resource environments, and 

en-route medical technologies to treat wounded warfighters. (10 

minutes) 

11. Eshoo (CA), McKinley (WV): Increases funding for Peer-reviewed pancreatic cancer research in the Department of Defense’s 

Defense Health Program by $2 million, offset by a $2 million decrease from Defense-wide Operation and Maintenance. (10 minutes) 

12. Jackson Lee (TX): Increases and decreases the Department of 

Defense Military Retirement Fund by $2 million to provide the Secretary of Defense the flexibility needed for technical assistance for 

U.S. military women to military women in other countries combating violence targeting women and children as a weapon of war, 

terrorism, human trafficking, and narcotics trafficking. (10 minutes) 

13. Langevin (RI), Lamborn (CO), Lieu (CA): Increases by 

$10,000,000 the Naval Railgun for common mount development, 

decreases by $10,000,000 the Strategic Capabilities Office. (10 minutes) 

14. Langevin (RI): Increases funding for the Spinal Cord Injury 

Research Program within the Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs by $10 million. (10 minutes) 

15. Langevin (RI): Increases funding by $2 million for civics education grants under the National Defense Education Program. 

Grants will fund the development and evaluation of civics education programs at Department of Defense domestic schools. (10 

minutes) 

16. Graves, Sam (MO), Gabbard (HI), Lipinski (IL): Increases 

and decreases the Operation and Maintenance, Defense wide account by $5 million in order to reserve $5 million to commemorate 

the 75th anniversary of World War II. (10 minutes) 

17. Moore (WI): Increases funding for Air National Guard Facilities Sustainment, Restoration, and Modernization by $2.5 million. 

(10 minutes) 

7 

18. Wilson, Joe (SC), Lamb (PA), Doyle (PA): Provides $4.8 million to support mitigating musculoskeletal injury risk and optimizing bone and muscle adaptation for military physical training. 

(10 minutes) 

19. Lipinski (IL): Increases and decreases the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-wide account by $10 million in 

order to redirect $10 million within the RDTE account to be used 

for the National Security Innovation Network, for the purpose of 

expanding the Hacking for Defense course to more universities 

across the United States. (10 minutes) 

20. Walberg (MI): Prohibits any funds under the Defense Division to be made available for the Taliban. (10 minutes) 

21. Speier (CA), Kennedy (MA), Davis, Susan (CA), Brown (MD), 

Escobar (TX), Pressley (MA), Cisneros (CA): Prevents DOD from 

spending funds to implement ban on open transgender service. (10 

minutes) 

22. Schweikert (AZ): Increasing funding for the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide by $1 million for the 

purpose of improving efforts to research and develop distributed 

ledger technologies for defense applications. (10 minutes) 

23. Carson (IN): Increases and decreases the Defense-wide Research, Development, Test and Evaluation account by $4 million in 

order to fund DoD’s HBCU program. This will further help facilitate DoD’s investments in the physical science, mathematics, and 

engineering programs at Historically Black Colleges and Universities and their corresponding national security benefits. (10 minutes) 

24. Amash (MI), Lofgren (CA): Limits the warrantless collection 

of Americans’ communications under section 702 of FISA. (10 minutes) 

25. Garamendi (CA): Requires domestic sourcing of components 

for the third and subsequent ships of the Frigate program. (10 minutes) 

26. Barr (KY), Guthrie (KY): Increases funding for Army Reserve 

Operation and Maintenance, for Army Operation and Maintenance, 

and for Army National Guard Operation and Maintenance by $2 

million each to be used for training support, such as the training 

of National Guard and Reserve components by Army in order to 

improve readiness. (10 minutes) 

27. Cicilline (RI): Increases funding for the Defense Established 

Program to Stimulate Competitive Research (DEPSCoR) program 

by $1.5 million. (10 minutes) 

28. Dingell (MI), Neguse (CO), Turner (OH), Gonza ́lez-Colo ́n, 

Jenniffer (PR), Young (AK), Trone (MD), Porter (CA), Welch (VT): 

Provides for an additional $5 million for the Fisher House Foundation which is offset by an outlay neutral reduction in the Operation 

and Maintenance, Defense-wide account. (10 minutes) 

29. Dingell (MI), McKinley (WV): Increases funding for research, 

development, test and evaluation by $20 million for arthritis research within the Congressionally Directed Medical Research Program (CDMRP). (10 minutes) 

30. Bera (CA), Larsen, Rick (WA): Increases DoD funding to partner nations to help them prevent, detect, and respond to biological 

threats and infectious disease before they come to the U.S. by $20 

8 

million, reducing Defense Wide Operation and Maintenance by the 

same amount. (10 minutes) 

31. Moulton (MA), Wilson, Joe (SC), Fleischmann (TN): Increases 

and decreases the Navy’s Operation and Maintenance account by 

$4.3 million in order to restore the United States Sea Cadet Corps’ 

funding to historic levels. The Sea Cadet Corps is a congressionally-chartered, U.S. Navy-based youth military program that promotes interest in the military and seamanship, as well as aviation, 

science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. (10 minutes) 

32. Moulton (MA), Wilson, Joe (SC), Fleischmann (TN): Increases 

and decreases the Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, 

Defense account by $3 million funding in order to restore funding 

for the Young Marines to historic levels. The Young Marines are 

a youth military program that partners with the DEA, Military 

Services, and other national service organization, to develop 8–18 

year old members into responsible citizens and leaders. (10 minutes) 

33. Kuster (NH), Pappas (NH): Increases funding to upgrade oxy- gen life support systems on Ohio Class submarine by $11,969,000. 

(10 minutes) 

34. Kuster (NH), Schneider (IL): Increases and decreases the defense-wide Research, Development, Test and Evaluation account by 

$5 million in order to support funding to develop lead-free defense 

electronics to ensure the defense industry can integrate cutting 

edge civilian technology to meet military requirements. (10 minutes) 

35. Emmer (MN): Allocates an increase of $3 million to Defensewide Demilitarization Systems to develop a feasible waterjet system to defeat a munition’s chemical, biological, or explosive ordnance without removing the munition in theater, in accordance 

with Department of Defense recommendations. (10 minutes) 36. Brownley (CA): Provides an increase of $3,492,000 for Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Navy, offset by a 

$4,080,000 decrease in funding for Research, Development, Test, 

and Evaluation, Defense-wide. (10 minutes) 

37. Allen (GA), Khanna (CA): Increases and decreases the Defense-wide Operation and Maintenance account by $10 million in 

order to assist in identifying unclaimed remains missing since the 

Korean conflict. (10 minutes) 

38. Veasey (TX): Increases funding for the Future Vertical Lift 

Advanced Technologies program from $16 million to $25 million. 

(10 minutes) 

39. Stefanik (NY), Gallego (AZ): Increases and decreases by $20 

million the Air Force Procurement account to support the E–11A 

aircraft to expand the Battlefield Airborne Communications Node 

(BACN) mission. (10 minutes) 

40. Jeffries (NY): Increases and decreases the Department of Defense Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide Fund by $500,000 

to provide funding for additional reporting on the immediate risks 

to U.S. national security posed by climate change and its impacts 

to the Department and its ability to defend the nation. (10 minutes) 

41. Gonza ́lez-Colo ́n, Jenniffer (PR), Sablan (MP): Increases and 

decreases funding for the Innovative Readiness Training Program 

by $4.356 million, for the purpose of supporting DOD’s efforts to 

9 

produce mission-ready forces through military training opportunities and simultaneously provide key services for American communities. (10 minutes) 

42. Kildee (MI): Increases funding for the Army, Air Force, and Navy Environmental Restoration funds by $15 million to clean up 

PFAS contamination in and around military bases offset by a $16 

million cut to DoD wide Operations and Maintenance. (10 minutes) 43. Norman (SC): Increases and decreases $15 million from the 

Weapons Procurement, Navy to allow for the funding of one Expeditionary Sea Base Classed ship upgrade pilot program to reduce 

the amount of escort missions required to be conducted by Destroyer class ships. (10 minutes) 

44. Lieu (CA): Prohibits funds from being used to issue export licenses for any defense article or service as described in 22 enumerated certification transmittal documents designated by the Department of State. (10 minutes) 

45. Gallagher (WI): Restores $96 M in research and development 

funds for INF-range conventional missile systems, offset by corresponding reduction to defense-wide operation and maintenance. 

(10 minutes) 

46. Panetta (CA): Increases funding for Navy research by $8 million to achieve future capabilities to maintain maritime superiority 

and ensure national security. (10 minutes) 

47. Cheney (WY): Increases funding for the Weapons Procure- ment, Navy account by $19.6 million in order to restore funding 

within in the DoD bill for the W76–2 warhead called for by the 

2018 Nuclear Posture Review to counter Russia’s advantage in tactical nuclear weapons and escalate to deescalate strategy. (10 minutes) 

48. Carbajal (CA), Cisneros (CA): Increases funding for more Im- proved Outer Tactical Vests for female service members by $5 million. The safety of female service members who are in physically 

demanding occupations like infantry and armor is compromised as 

they are not provided properly designed and fitted combat equipment. Properly designed and fitted combat equipment for women 

should be available beginning with initial entry training through 

any and all deployments. (10 minutes) 

49. Carbajal (CA), Chu (CA), Torres, Norma (CA): Increase 

RDTE, Army by $4 million to fund university and industry research centers to pursue research in areas of biotechnology such as 

advances in materials, neuroscience, systems, synthetic biology, 

nanotechnology and immersive technology. (10 minutes) 

50. Blunt Rochester (DE): Increases and decreases by $1,000,000 

Operations & Maintenance, Defense-wide account which funds the 

Space-Available flights program and for the purpose of instructing 

the Department to provide Congress with an assessment of possible 

concerns or issues in expanding eligibility for the Space-A program 

to include caregivers and spouses when accompanying 100% disabled veterans. (10 minutes) 

51. Jayapal (WA): Specifies that none of the funds made available by this act may be used for research on the Long Range Stand 

Off Weapon (LRSO). (10 minutes) 

52. O’Halleran (AZ): Increases the Navy Research, Development, 

Test and Evaluation account by $5 million in order to fund for 

Electromagnetic Systems Applied Research to better enable the 

10 

Naval Research Laboratory to fully contribute to the U.S. Naval 

Observatory mission in providing the U.S. Navy and Department 

of Defense spacial Positioning, Navigation, and Timing (PNT). (10 

minutes) 

53. Brown (MD): Reduces Navy Operation & Maintenance Account by $3,000,000 and increases the Defense Wide Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation account by $3,000,000 for cyber 

resiliency efforts in the Central Test and Evaluation Investment 

Program (CTEIP). (10 minutes) 

54. Brindisi (NY): Increases funding for Research, Development, 

Test and Evaluation, Air Force by $5 million for the purpose of improving research and development of Quantum Information 

Sciences. (10 minutes) 

55. Pappas (NH): Supports funding for PFOA/PFOS Study and 

Analysis by increasing and decreasing the Defense-wide Operation 

and Maintenance account by $2 million. (10 minutes) 

56. Pappas (NH): Increases funding for the Army’s Research, Development, Test and Evaluation account by $2.5 million. (10 minutes) 

57. Sherrill (NJ), Langevin (RI): Increases funding for Defensewide RDTE by $3 million to strengthen efforts to secure science 

and technology research. (10 minutes) 

58. Sherrill (NJ): Increases and decreases the Navy Research, 

Development, Test and Evaluation account by $5 million in order 

to support the certification/qualification process to enable the Navy 

to integrate 3–D printed parts more efficiently into the submarine 

fleet. (10 minutes) 

59. Crow (CO), Perlmutter (CO): Increases and decreases the Defense-wide Operation and Maintenance account by $13 million in 

order to support the Department of Defense’s Readiness and Environmental Protection Integration program, which protects military 

installations from environmental conflicts that could inhibit operations. (10 minutes) 

60. Crow (CO): Increases funding through the Defense Health 

Program for research for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) by $20 

million. (10 minutes) 

61. Cox (CA): Reduces funds for the Operation and Maintenance 

Account, Defense-Wide by $10 million and increases funds for medical research concerning traumatic brain injury, posttraumatic 

stress disorder, and psychological health by a similar amount. (10 

minutes) 

62. Torres Small, Xochitl (NM): Increases and decreases funding 

in the Defense-wide Operation and Maintenance account by $5 million in order to support a pilot program to provide broadband access to military families and medical facilities on or near remote 

and isolated bases. (10 minutes) 

AMENDMENTS TO DIVISION E (ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT AND

RELATED AGENCIES) MADE IN ORDER

63. Burgess (TX): Reduces spending in Division E by 5 percent. 

(10 minutes) 

64. Burgess (TX), Smith, Jason (MO): Strikes Section 108 in Division E that prohibits any funding being used for border security 

infrastructure along the southern border. (10 minutes) 

11 

65. Wasserman Schultz (FL), Hastings (FL), Shalala (FL), 

Frankel (FL), Crist (FL), Diaz-Balart (FL), Mucarsel-Powell (FL): 

States that none of the funds made available by this Act may be 

used to issue a permit under section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act for the discharge of dredged or fill material from 

a project within Water Conservation Areas in the Everglades. (10 

minutes) 

66. Fleischmann (TN): Increases and decreases the Weapons Activities account by $123 million for construction of critical infrastructure in NNSA. (10 minutes) 

67. Norton (DC), Brown (MD), Connolly (VA), Trone (MD): Increases and decreases $5 million from the Investigations fund to instruct USACE to prioritize funding for the Anacostia Watershed 

Restoration Program. (10 minutes) 

68. Wilson, Joe (SC): Increase and decreases by $6.5 million from 

the Defense Environmental Cleanup account to highlight the Savannah River Community and Regulatory Support under the Savannah River Site. (10 minutes) 

69. Vela ́zquez (NY): Increases and decreases the Army Corps of 

Engineers construction projects account by $45,000,000 to support 

Cano Martin Pena environmental restoration project in San Juan, 

Puerto Rico and combat the environmental degradation and persistent flooding that disadvantages communities abutting the channel, as evidenced by Hurricanes Irma and Maria. (10 minutes) 

70. Graves, Sam (MO): Moves $4 million from the Bureau of Reclamation and add $4 million to the Army Corps funding for investigations. The intent of this amendment is for the $4 million added 

to conduct investigations be used to study natural disasters that occurred in 2019, such as flooding in the Midwest. (10 minutes) 

71. Langevin (RI), Garamendi (CA), Larsen, Rick (WA), Foster 

(IL): This amendment is a plus and minus of $5 million within the 

Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation account in support of low-enriched uranium (LEU) research for naval reactors at the NNSA. (10 

minutes) 

72. Walberg (MI), Rush (IL): Increases funding for the office of 

Cybersecurity, Energy Security, and Emergency Response (CESER) 

at the Department of Energy by $3 million to improve cybersecurity and emergency response for the bulk power system. (10 minutes) 

73. Grijalva (AZ), Haaland (NM): Increases Office of Indian Energy Policy and Program by 2 million and decreases Fossil Fuel Research and Development by 2.4 million. (10 minutes) 

74. Richmond (LA), Scalise (LA): Increases the Army Corps of 

Engineers Operations and Maintenance accounts by $4,000,000 and 

decreases the Administration Expenses account by the same 

amount. (10 minutes) 

75. Richmond (LA), Scalise (LA): Increases and decreases funding 

to the Army Corps of Engineers Operation and Maintenance Accounts by $75,000,000 for dredging activities. (10 minutes) 

76. Richmond (LA), Scalise (LA): Provides $5 million for construction projects under the Army Corps of Engineers for the construction of Louisiana Coastal Area Beneficial Use of Dredged Material 

restoration projects with an offset from Corps of Engineers expenses. (10 minutes) 

12 

77. Lipinski (IL), Foster (IL): Redirects $15,000,000 within the 

Department of Energy Office of Science account towards the Argonne Leadership Computing Facility. (10 minutes) 

78. McKinley (WV), Mooney (WV): Transfers $3 million from the 

Departmental Administration account to the Fossil Energy Research and Development account. (10 minutes) 

79. Loebsack (IA), Welch (VT): Increases and then reduces the 

Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy account by $5,000,000 

with the intent of supporting the advancement of distributed wind 

technologies and research. (10 minutes) 

80. Gosar (AZ): Prohibits funds from being used for the Clean 

Cities Program. (10 minutes) 

81. Welch (VT): Increases and decreases by $40 million funding 

within the Army Corps Construction account (Division E) to fund 

dam rehabilitation work authorized by Section 3202 of the 2018 

America’s Water Infrastructure Act. (10 minutes) 

82. Kuster (NH), Stefanik (NY), Pappas (NH), Welch (VT): Increases funding to the Northern Border Regional Commission, a 

rural economic development agency that supports job creation efforts and infrastructure projects in economically distressed rural 

communities. (10 minutes) 

83. Castor (FL): None of the funds made available in this Act 

may be used to finalize the Department of Energy’s proposed rule 

to rollback efficiency standards for certain light bulbs. (10 minutes) 

84. Perry (PA): Decreases funding for departmental administration by $2 million and increases money for the Water Power Technologies Office within the Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy 

Program by the same amount. (10 minutes) 

85. Foster (IL): Adds and removes a dollar from this account for 

the purpose of instructing the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to include a review of accelerator driven 

systems in its evaluation of the merits and viability of different nuclear fuel cycles and technology options, including both existing and 

future technologies. (10 minutes) 

86. Hudson (NC): Increases and decreases $1,317,808,000 from 

the Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy for the purpose of creating a pilot program to provide energy resilience to Department of Defense and Department of Energy facilities by contracting with a commercial entity to site, construct, and operate a 

micro-reactor. (10 minutes) 

87. Bera (CA): Increases funding for the National Levee Safety 

Inventory. (10 minutes) 

88. Bera (CA): Increases and decreases Reclamation’s Water and 

Related Resources Account by $2 million to support the 

WaterSmart Program. (10 minutes) 

89. Mullin (OK): Prohibits the use of funds to prepare, propose, 

or promulgate any regulation or guidance that references or relies 

on analysis of the cost of social carbon under certain Technical 

Support Documents published by the Interagency Working Group 

on Social Cost of Carbon. (10 minutes) 

90. Huffman (CA): States that none of the funds in this act can 

be used for the Army Corps of Engineers to finalize the environmental impact statement for the proposed Pebble Mine project. (10 

minutes) 

13 

91. Graves, Garret (LA): Strikes section 106 of division E, which 

states that none of the funds made available by this Act may be 

used to reorganize or to transfer the Civil Works functions or authority of the Corps of Engineers or the Secretary of the Army to 

another department or agency. (10 minutes) 92. Ruiz (CA): Increases and decreases by $2 million within the 

Water and Related Resources Account in order to support projects 

with a public health benefit. (10 minutes) 

93. Rouzer (NC): Decreases funding for the Office of the Assist- ant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works by $2,000,000 and increases funding for the Army Corps of Engineers Operations and 

Maintenance account by the same amount to carry out Section 

1149 of the WIIN Act (PL–114–322). (10 minutes) 

94. Boyle (PA), Porter (CA): Prevents funds from being used to 

reject any application for a grant due to the use of the term ‘‘global 

warming’’ or the term ‘‘climate change’’ in the application. (10 minutes) 

95. Estes (KS): Adds and removes five million to highlight the 

importance of properly funding Bureau of Reclamation ground 

water restoration projects. (10 minutes) 

96. Rice, Kathleen (NY): Increases and decreases funding to the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy by $16.3 million 

in order to support the Wind Energy Program. (10 minutes) 

97. Banks (IN): Reduces spending for each amount in Division E, 

except those amounts made available to the Department of Defense, by 14 percent. (10 minutes) 

98. Plaskett (VI): Increases and decreases the Army Corps of En- gineers construction projects account by $100 million to support 

projects related to flood and storm damage reduction. (10 minutes) 99. Cloud (TX): Transfers $3 million from the DOE Departmental 

Administration account to Nuclear Energy Research and Development account. (10 minutes) 

100. Cloud (TX): Transfers $3 million from DOE Departmental 

Administration account to Fossil Energy Research and Development account. (10 minutes) 

101. Blunt Rochester (DE): Adds and removes $1 million from 

the Army Corps of Engineers Investigations account for the purpose of instructing the Army Corps of Engineers to review all existing projects for which they are in arrears with project partners 

across the country, such as the Indian River Inlet project in Delaware. (10 minutes) 

102. Lamb (PA), Weber (TX): Reduces and increases funding to 

the Office of Nuclear Energy by $1 million to emphasize the importance of research into increasing the cost effectiveness and efficiency of the domestic commercial nuclear fleet. (10 minutes) 

103. Jayapal (WA): Decreases Nuclear Weapons Activities funding by $661 million and increases Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Activities account by the same amount. (10 minutes) 

104. O’Halleran (AZ), Porter (CA): Increases the Department of 

Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Account by $1 million to 

support the Solar Ready Vets Program. (10 minutes) 

105. Omar (MN), Jayapal (WA): Clarifies that the Department of 

Energy’s Section 1703 Loan Program is providing loans only to 

clean energy projects that avoid, reduce, or sequester air pollutants 

or human-caused emissions of greenhouse gases. (10 minutes) 

14 

106. Lee, Susie (NV): Increases funding for ARPA–E by $3 million and decreases funding for Department of Energy Departmental 

Funds $3 million. (10 minutes) 

107. Rouda (CA): Adds and removes $5 million from the Corps 

of Engineers construction account for the purpose of highlighting 

the need to reauthorize Section 1043 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 and to include necessary 

changes to the pilot program in its reauthorization. (10 minutes) 

108. Garcı ́a, Jesu ́ s (IL): Increases funding for Energy Efficiency 

and Renewable Energy (EERE) by $5 million and reduces funding 

for Fossil Fuel Research and Development by $5 million. (10 minutes) 

109. Levin, Mike (CA), Welch (VT): Provides funding for the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to finalize its rulemaking on 

aggregated distributed energy resource participation in wholesale 

energy markets. (10 minutes) 

110. Craig (MN), Malinowski (NJ): Increases by $1 million the 

funding for the Army Corps of Engineers Investigations Account intended to be directed towards the National Flood Risk Management and Flood Damage data Programs to address flood planning 

for disaster prone regions. Increases by $1 million the funding for 

the Army Corps of Engineers Operations and Maintenance account 

intended to be directed towards the Corps Water Management System (CWMS) to assist river flow tracking during flooding. (10 minutes) 

111. Craig (MN): Increases and decreases by $7.5 million for the 

Beneficial Use of Dredged Material Pilot Program for the Army 

Corps of Engineers. (10 minutes) 

112. McAdams (UT): Increases funds by $5 million to the Central 

Utah Project Completion Act account for the purposes of completing water project development and decreases funding by $4 million from the Bureau of Reclamation administrative account and 

decreases funding by $2 million from the Policy and Administration 

account. (10 minutes) 

113. Levin, Andy (MI): Increases and decreases funding for construction of certain river, harbor, flood and storm damage and related projects by $30 million in order to prioritize $30 million in 

funding for ongoing efforts to improve water quality in Lake St. 

Clair, Michigan, including by improving the Chapaton Retention 

Basin, a Macomb County Combined Sewer Overflow System. (10 

minutes) 

SUMMARY OF THE AMENDMENTS TO DIVISION A (LABOR, HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES, AND EDUCATION, AND RELATED AGENCIES) IN

PART B MADE IN ORDER

1. Pocan (WI), Deutch (FL), DelBene (WA), Speier (CA), Raskin 

(MD), Nadler (NY), DeGette (CO), Lee, Barbara (CA), Lofgren (CA), 

Khanna (CA): Prohibits the implementation of a new HHS policy 

announced on June 5, 2019, that would restrict fetal tissue research. (10 minutes) 

2. Pascrell (NJ), McKinley (WV), DeGette (CO), Tipton (CO): Provides $10 million to the Alternatives to Opioids in the Emergency 

Department which is authorized in Section 7091 of the SUPPORT 

for Patients and Communities Act, P.L. 115–271. (10 minutes) 

15 

PART A—TEXT OF AMENDMENTS MADE IN ORDER

TEXT OF AMENDMENTS TO DIVISION D (STATE, FOREIGN OPERATIONS, 

AND RELATED PROGRAMS) MADE IN ORDER

1. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE SHERMAN

OF CALIFORNIA OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 384, line 19, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by $500,000)’’. 

Page 394, line 24, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by $500,000)’’. 

2. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE ALLEN OF

GEORGIA OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

At the end of division D (before the short title), insert the following: 

SEC. ll. Each amount made available by this division is hereby 

reduced by 1 percent. 

3. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE KILDEE OF

MICHIGAN OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 381, line 11, after the first dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced 

by $500,000)’’. 

Page 382, line 19, after the first dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced 

by $500,000)’’. 

Page 394, line 13, after the first dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased 

by $500,000)’’. 

4. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE BOST OF

ILLINOIS OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 381, line 11, after the first dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased 

by $1,000,000) (reduced by $1,000,000)’’. 

5. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE ROUDA OF

CALIFORNIA OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 416, line 6, after the first dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by $2,000,000)’’. 

Page 416, line 6, after the first dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by $2,000,000)’’. 

TEXT OF AMENDMENTS TO DIVISION C (DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE)

MADE IN ORDER

6. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE STEWART

OF UTAH OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 223, line 22, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by $200,000)’’. 

Page 223, line 22, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(decreased by $200,000)’’. 

16 

7. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE YOUNG OF

ALASKA OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 223, line 4, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by $8,500,000)’’. 

Page 223, line 22, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by $8,500,000)’’. 

8. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE ENGEL OF

NEW YORK OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 366, strike lines 11 through 13. 

9. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE SMITH OF

NEW JERSEY OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 223, line 22, after the first dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by $2,000,000)’’. 

Page 248, line 18, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by $2,000,000)’’. 

Page 249, line 1, after the first dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by $2,000,000)’’. 

10. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE ESHOO OF

CALIFORNIA OR HER DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 247, line 6, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by $9,500,000)’’. 

Page 247, line 6, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by $9,500,000)’’. 

11. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE ESHOO OF

CALIFORNIA OR HER DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 223, line 22, after the first dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by $2,000,000)’’. 

Page 248, line 18, after the first dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by $2,000,000)’’. 

Page 249, line 1, after the first dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by $2,000,000)’’. 

12. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE JACKSON

LEE OF TEXAS OR HER DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 217, line 19, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by 

$2,000,000) (reduced by $2,000,000)’’. 

13. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE LANGEVIN

OF RHODE ISLAND OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 246, line 18, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by $10,000,000)’’. 

Page 247, line 17, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by $10,000,000)’’. 

17 

14. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE LANGEVIN

OF RHODE ISLAND OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 247, line 17, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by 

$10,000,000)’’. 

Page 248, line 18, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by 

$10,000,000)’’. 

Page 249, line 1, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by 

$10,000,000)’’. 

Page 249, line 12, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by 

$10,000,000)’’. 

15. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE LANGEVIN

OF RHODE ISLAND OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 245, line 5, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by 

$2,000,000)’’. 

Page 247, line 17, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by 

$2,000,000)’’. 

16. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE GRAVES

OF MISSOURI OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 223, line 22, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by 

$5,000,000) (reduced by $5,000,000)’’. 

17. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE MOORE

OF WISCONSIN OR HER DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 228, line 13, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by 

$2,500,000)’’. 

Page 228, line 13, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by 

$2,500,000)’’. 

18. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE WILSON

OF SOUTH CAROLINA OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 246, line 11, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by 

$4,800,000)’’. 

Page 247, line 17, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by 

$4,800,000)’’. 

19. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE LIPINSKI

OF ILLINOIS OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 247, line 17, after the first dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced 

by $10,000,000)(increased by $10,000,000)’’. 

20. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE WALBERG

OF MICHIGAN OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

At the end of division C (before the short title), insert the following: 

18 

SEC. ll. None of the funds made available by this Act may be 

made available to the Taliban. 

21. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE SPEIER OF

CALIFORNIA OR HER DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

At the end of division C (before the short title), insert the following: 

SEC. ll. None of the funds made available by this Act may be 

used to implement Directive-type Memorandum (DTM)-19-004, 

Military Service by Transgender Persons and Persons with Gender 

Dysphoria, March 12, 2019 (effective date April 12, 2019). 

22. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE

SCHWEIKERT OF ARIZONA OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 

MINUTES

Page 246, line 11, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by 

$1,000,000)’’. 

Page 247, line 17, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by 

$1,000,000)’’. 

23. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE CARSON

OF INDIANA OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 247, line 17, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by 

$4,000,000)’’. 

Page 247, line 17, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by 

$4,000,000)’’. 

24. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE AMASH OF

MICHIGAN OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

At the end of division C (before the short title), insert the following: 

SEC. lll. None of the funds made available by this Act may 

be used to submit a certification under section 702(h) of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, or for an acquisition pursuant to such a certification, if such certification does not include 

the following sentence: ‘‘This certification does not authorize any 

acquisition that intentionally targets a person reasonably believed 

to be located outside the United States if a significant purpose of 

such targeting is to acquire the communications of a particular, 

known person reasonably believed to be in the United States, any 

acquisition of a communication as to which no participant is a person who is targeted pursuant to the authorized acquisition, or any 

acquisition of a communication known to be entirely domestic’’. 

19 

25. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE

GARAMENDI OF CALIFORNIA OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 

MINUTES

Page 325, line 4, insert ‘‘third ship and subsequent ships of the’’ 

before ‘‘FFG-Frigate’’. 

26. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE BARR OF

KENTUCKY OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 222, line 6, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by 

$2,000,000)’’. 

Page 223, line 22, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by 

$6,000,000)’’. 

Page 226, line 4, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by 

$2,000,000)’’. 

Page 227, line 21, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by 

$2,000,000)’’. 

27. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE CICILLINE

OF RHODE ISLAND OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 223, line 14, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by 

$1,500,000)’’. 

Page 247, line 17, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by 

$1,500,000)’’. 

28. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE DINGELL

OF MICHIGAN OR HER DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 223, line 22, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by 

$7,700,000)’’. 

Page 300, line 6, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by 

$5,000,000)’’. 

29. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE DINGELL

OF MICHIGAN OR HER DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 248, line 19, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by 

$20,000,000)’’. 

Page 249, line 1, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by 

$20,000,000)’’. 

30. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE BERA OF

CALIFORNIA OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 223, line 22, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by 

$20,000,000)’’. 

Page 233, line 9, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by 

$20,000,000)’’. 

20 

31. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE MOULTON

OF MASSACHUSETTS OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 222, line 15, after the first dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced 

by $4,300,000)’’. 

Page 222, line 15, after the first dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased 

by $4,300,000)’’. 

32. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE MOULTON

OF MASSACHUSETTS OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 251, line 10, after the first dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced 

by $3,000,000)’’. 

Page 251, line 10, after the first dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased 

by $3,000,000)’’. 

Page 251, line 12, after the first dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced 

by $3,000,000)’’. 

Page 251, line 12, after the first dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased 

by $3,000,000)’’. 

33. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE KUSTER

OF NEW HAMPSHIRE OR HER DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 241, line 13, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by 

$5,333,000)’’. 

Page 245, line 20, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by 

$5,333,000)’’. 

34. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE KUSTER

OF NEW HAMPSHIRE OR HER DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MIN- UTES

Page 247, line 17, insert ‘‘(increased by $5,000,0000) (reduced by 

$5,000,000)’’ after the dollar amount. 

35. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE EMMER

OF MINNESOTA OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 223, line 4, insert ‘‘(reduced by $3,000,000)’’ after the dollar 

amount. 

Page 247, line 17, insert ‘‘(increased by $3,000,000)’’ after the dollar amount. 

36. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE

BROWNLEY OF CALIFORNIA OR HER DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 

MINUTES

Page 246, line 18, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by $3,492,000)’’. 

Page 247, line 17, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by $4,080,000)’’. 

21 

37. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE ALLEN OF

GEORGIA OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 223, line 22, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by 

$10,000,000) (increased by $10,000,000)’’. 

38. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE VEASEY

OF TEXAS OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 223, line 22, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by 

$9,000,000)’’. 

Page 246, line 11, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by 

$9,000,000)’’. 

39. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE STEFANIK

OF NEW YORK OR HER DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 242, line 18, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by 

$20,000,000) (increased by $20,000,000)’’. 

40. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE JEFFRIES

OF NEW YORK OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 223, line 22, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by 

$500,000) (increased by $500,000)’’. 

41. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE

GONZA ́LEZ-COLO ́ N OF PUERTO RICO OR HER DESIGNEE, DEBAT- ABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 223, line 22, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by $4,356,000) (reduced by $4,356,000)’’. 

42. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE KILDEE

OF MICHIGAN OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 223, line 22, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by 

$16,000,000)’’. 

Page 228, line 22, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by 

$5,000,000)’’. 

Page 229, line 17, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by 

$5,000,000)’’. 

Page 230, line 12, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by 

$5,000,000)’’. 

43. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE NORMAN

OF SOUTH CAROLINA OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 238, line 2, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by 

$7,500,000) (increased by $7,500,000)’’. 

22 

44. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE LIEU OF

CALIFORNIA OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

At the end of division C (before the short title), insert the following: 

SEC. ll. None of the funds made available by this Act may be 

used to issue export licenses for the following defense items, including defense articles, defense services, and related technical data, 

described in the certification Transmittal Numbers DDTC-17-079, 

DDTC-17-094, DDTC 17-112, DDTC-17-126, DDTC-17-128, DDTC18-013, DDTC-18-029, DDTC-18-030, DDTC-18-050, DDTC-18-080, 

DDTC-18-103, DDTC-18-109, DDTC-18-110, DDTC-19-001, 17-0B, 

17-BM, 17-CR, 17-CU, 18-AU, 18-BE, 19-AA and 19-AR. 

45. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE GALLA- GHER OF WISCONSIN OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MIN- UTES

Page 223, line 22, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by 

$96,000,000)’’. 

Page 246, line 11, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by 

$20,000,000)’’. 

Page 247, line 17, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by 

$76,000,000)’’. 

46. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE PANETTA

OF CALIFORNIA OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 223, line 22, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by 

$8,000,000)’’. 

Page 246, line 18, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by 

$8,000,000)’’. 

47. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE CHENEY

OF WYOMING OR HER DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 223, line 22, after the first dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by $19,600,000)’’. 

Page 238, line 2, after the first dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by $19,600,000)’’. 

48. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE CARBAJAL

OF CALIFORNIA OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 223, line 22, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by $5,000,000)’’. 

Page 222, line 6, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by $5,000,000)’’. 

49. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE CARBAJAL

OF CALIFORNIA OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 223, line 22, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by 

$4,000,000)’’. 

23 

Page 246, line 11, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by $4,000,000)’’. 

50. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE BLUNT

ROCHESTER OF DELAWARE OR HER DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 

MINUTES

Page 223, line 22, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by 

$1,000,000)’’. 

Page 223, line 22, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by 

$1,000,000).’’ 

51. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE JAYAPAL

OF WASHINGTON OR HER DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

At the end of division C (before the short title), insert the following: 

SEC. ll. None of the funds made available by this Act may be 

used for continued research on the Long-Range Standoff missile 

(LRSO). 

52. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE

O’HALLERAN OF ARIZONA OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 

MINUTES

Page 246, line 18, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by 

$5,000,000)’’. 

Page 247, line 17, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by 

$6,000,000)’’. 

53. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE BROWN

OF MARYLAND OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 222, line 15, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by $3,000,000)’’. 

Page 247, line 17, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by $3,000,000)’’. 

54. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE BRINDISI

OF NEW YORK OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 223, line 22, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by 

$5,000,000)’’. 

Page 247, line 6, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by 

$5,000,000)’’. 

55. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE PAPPAS

OF NEW HAMPSHIRE OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 223, line 22, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by $2,000,000)’’. 

Page 223, line 22, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by $2,000,000)’’. 

24 

56. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE PAPPAS

OF NEW HAMPSHIRE OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 246, line 11, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by 

$2,500,000)’’. 

Page 247, line 17, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(decreased by 

$2,500,000)’’. 

57. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE SHERRILL

OF NEW JERSEY OR HER DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 223, line 22, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by 

$3,000,000)’’. 

Page 247, line 17, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by 

$3,000,000)’’. 

58. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE SHERRILL

OF NEW JERSEY OR HER DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 246, line 18, after the first dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced 

by $5,000,000)’’. 

Page 246, line 18, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by 

$5,000,000)’’. 

59. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE CROW OF

COLORADO OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 223, line 22, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by 

$13,000,000)’’. 

Page 223, line 22, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by 

$13,000,000)’’. 

60. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE CROW OF

COLORADO OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 248, line 19, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by 

$20,000,000)’’. 

Page 249, line 1, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by 

$20,000,000)’’. 

61. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE COX OF

CALIFORNIA OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 223, line 22, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by 

$10,000,000)’’. 

Page 248, line 18, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by 

$10,000,000)’’. 

Page 249, line 1, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by 

$10,000,000)’’. 

25 

62. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE TORRES

SMALL OF NEW MEXICO OR HER DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 

MINUTES

Page 223, line 22, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by 

$5,000,000) (increased by $5,000,000)’’. 

TEXT OF AMENDMENTS TO DIVISION E (ENERGY AND WATER

DEVELOPMENT AND RELATED AGENCIES) MADE IN ORDER

63. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE BURGESS

OF TEXAS OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

At the end of Division E (before the short title) insert the following: 

SEC. ll. Each amount made available by this Division is hereby reduced by 5 percent. 

64. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE BURGESS

OF TEXAS OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 620, strike lines 1 through 8. 

65. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE

WASSERMAN SCHULTZ OF FLORIDA OR HER DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE

FOR 10 MINUTES

At the end of division E (before the short title), insert the following: 

SEC. lll. None of the funds made available by this Act may 

be used to issue a permit under section 404 of the Federal Water 

Pollution Control Act for the discharge of dredged or fill material 

from a project located within Water Conservation Areas 3A and 3B 

in the State of Florida. 

66. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE

FLEISCHMANN OF TENNESSEE OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR

10 MINUTES

Page 639, line 14, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by 

$123,000,000) (reduced by $123,000,000)’’. 

67. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE NORTON

OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OR HER DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE

FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 610, line 23, after the first dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced 

by $5,000,000) (increased by $5,000,000)’’. 

68. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE WILSON

OF SOUTH CAROLINA OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MIN- UTES

Page 641, line 12, after the first dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced 

by $6,500,000)’’. 

26 

Page 641, line 12, after the first dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased 

by $6,500,000)’’. 

69. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE

VELA ́ ZQUEZ OF NEW YORK OR HER DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 

MINUTES

Page 611, line 15. after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by 

$45,000,000) (increased by $45,000,000)’’. 

70. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE GRAVES

OF MISSOURI OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 610, line 23, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by 

$4,000,000)’’. 

Page 615, line 16, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by 

$4,000,000)’’. 

71. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE LANGEVIN

OF RHODE ISLAND OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 640, line 3, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by 

$5,000,000) (increased by $5,000,000)’’. 

72. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE WALBERG

OF MICHIGAN OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 630, line 7, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by 

$3,000,000)’’. 

Page 637, line 24, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by 

$3,000,000)’’. 

73. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE GRIJALVA

OF ARIZONA OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 631, line 22, after the first dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced 

by $2,400,000)’’. 

Page 637, line 15, after the first dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased 

by $2,000,000)’’. 

74. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE RICHMOND OF LOUISIANA OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 613, line 13, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by 

$4,000,000)’’. 

Page 615, line 16, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by 

$4,000,000)’’. 

27 

75. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE RICHMOND OF LOUISIANA OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 613, line 13, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by 

$75,000,000) (reduced by $75,000,000)’’. 

76. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE RICHMOND OF LOUISIANA OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 611, line 15, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by 

$5,000,000)’’. 

Page 615, line 16, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by 

$5,000,000)’’. 

77. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE LIPINSKI

OF ILLINOIS OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 635, line 5, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by 

$15,000,000) (increased by $15,000,000)’’. 

78. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE MCKINLEY OF WEST VIRGINIA OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 

MINUTES

Page 631, line 22, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by 

$3,000,000)’’. 

Page 637, line 24, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by 

$3,000,000)’’. 

79. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE LOEBSACK

OF IOWA OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 629, line 19, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by 

$5,000,000)(reduced by $5,000,000)’’. 

80. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE GOSAR OF

ARIZONA OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

At the end of division E (before the short title), insert the following: 

SEC. ll. None of the funds made available by this Act may be 

used for the Clean Cities Program. 

81. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE WELCH

OF VERMONT OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 611, line 15, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by 

$40,000,000) (reduced by $40,000,000)’’. 

28 

82. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE KUSTER

OF NEW HAMPSHIRE OR HER DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MIN- UTES

Page 637, line 24, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by 

$3,000,000)’’. 

Page 659, line 13, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by 

$3,000,000)’’. 

83. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE CASTOR

OF FLORIDA OR HER DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

At the end of division E (before the short title), insert the following: 

SEC. ll. None of the funds made available by this Act may be 

used to finalize the proposed rule entitled ‘‘Energy Conservation 

Program: Energy Conservation Standards for General Service 

Lamps’’ published by the Department of Energy in the Federal 

Register on February 11, 2019 (84 Fed. Reg. 3120). 

84. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE PERRY OF

PENNSYLVANIA OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 629, line 19, after the first dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased 

by $2,000,000)’’. 

Page 637, line 24, after the first dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced 

by $2,000,000)’’. 

85. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE FOSTER

OF ILLINOIS OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 631, line 6, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by 

$1)’’. 

Page 631, line 6, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by 

$1)’’. 

86. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE HUDSON

OF NORTH CAROLINA OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 631, line 6, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by 

$1,317,808,000)’’. 

Page 631, line 6, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by 

$1,317,808,000)’’. 

87. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE BERA OF

CALIFORNIA OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 613, line 13, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by $3,000,000)’’. 

Page 615, line 16, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by $3,000,000)’’. 

29 

88. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE BERA OF

CALIFORNIA OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 621, line 16, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by 

$2,000,000) (decreased by $2,000,000)’’. 

89. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE MULLIN

OF OKLAHOMA OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

At the end of division E (before the short title), insert the following: 

SEC. ll. None of the funds made available by this Act may be 

used to prepare, propose, or promulgate any regulation or guidance 

that references or relies on the analysis contained in— 

(1) ‘‘Technical Support Document: Social Cost of Carbon for 

Regulatory Impact Analysis Under Executive Order 12866’’, 

published by the Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of 

Carbon, United States Government, in February 2010; 

(2) ‘‘Technical Support Document: Technical Update of the 

Social Cost of Carbon for Regulatory Impact Analysis Under 

Executive Order 12866’’, published by the Interagency Working 

Group on Social Cost of Carbon, United States Government, in 

May 2013 and revised in November 2013; 

(3) ‘‘Revised Draft Guidance for Federal Departments and 

Agencies on Consideration of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and 

the Effects of Climate Change in NEPA Reviews’’, published by 

the Council on Environmental Quality on December 24, 2014 

(79 Fed. Reg. 77802); 

(4) ‘‘Technical Support Document: Technical Update of the 

Social Cost of Carbon for Regulatory Impact Analysis Under 

Executive Order 12866’’, published by the Interagency Working 

Group on Social Cost of Carbon, United States Government, in 

July 2015; 

(5) ‘‘Addendum to the Technical Support Document on Social 

Cost of Carbon for Regulatory Impact Analysis Under Executive Order 12866: Application of the Methodology to Estimate 

the Social Cost of Methane and the Social Cost of Nitrous 

Oxide’’, published by the Interagency Working Group on Social 

Cost of Greenhouse Gases, United States Government, in August 2016; or 

(6) ‘‘Technical Support Document: Technical Update of the 

Social Cost of Carbon for Regulatory Impact Analysis Under 

Executive Order 12866’’, published by the Interagency Working 

Group on Social Cost of Greenhouse Gases, United States Government, in August 2016. 

90. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE HUFFMAN

OF CALIFORNIA OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

At the end of division E (before the short title), insert the following: 

SEC. ll. None of the funds made available by this Act may be 

used to finalize the environmental impact statement for the proposed Pebble Project (POA–2017–271). 

30 

91. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE GRAVES

OF LOUISIANA OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

In division E, strike section 106. 

92. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE RUIZ OF

CALIFORNIA OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 621, line 16, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by $2,000,000) (increased by $2,000,000)’’. 

93. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE ROUZER

OF NORTH CAROLINA OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MIN- UTES

Page 613, line 13, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by $2,000,000)’’. 

Page 616, line 9, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by $2,000,000)’’. 

94. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE BOYLE OF

PENNSYLVANIA OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

At the end of division E (before the short title), insert the following: 

SEC. ll. None of the funds made available by this Act may be 

used to reject any application for a grant available under funds appropriated by this Act because of the use of the term ‘‘global warming’’ or the term ‘‘climate change’’ in the application. 

95. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE ESTES OF

KANSAS OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 621, line 16, afer the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by $5,000,000)’’. 

Page 621, line 16, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by $5,000,000)’’. 

96. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE RICE OF

NEW YORK OR HER DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 629, line 19, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by $16,308,000)’’. 

Page 629, line 19, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by 

$16,308,000)’’. 

97. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE BANKS OF

INDIANA OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

At the end of division E (before the short title), insert the following: 

SEC. l. Each amount made available in division E, except those 

amounts made available to the Department of Defense, is hereby 

reduced by 14 percent. 

31 

98. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE PLASKETT

OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS OR HER DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 

MINUTES

Page 611, line 15, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by 

$100,000,000) (increased by $100,000,000)’’. 

99. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE CLOUD OF

TEXAS OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 631, line 6, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by $3,000,000)’’. 

Page 637, line 24, after the first dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by $3,000,000)’’. 

100. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE CLOUD

OF TEXAS OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 631, line 22, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by 

$3,000,000)’’. 

Page 637, line 24, after the first dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced 

by $3,000,000)’’. 

101. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE BLUNT

ROCHESTER OF DELAWARE OR HER DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 

MINUTES

Page 610, line 23, after the first dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced 

by $1,000,000) (increased by $1,000,000)’’. 

102. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE LAMB OF

PENNSYLVANIA OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 631, line 6, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by 

$1,000,000) (increased by $1,000,000)’’. 

103. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE JAYAPAL

OF WASHINGTON OR HER DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 639, line 14, after the first dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced 

by $661,000,000)’’. 

Page 640, line 3, after the first dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased 

by $661,000,000)’’. 

104. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE

O’HALLERAN OF ARIZONA OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 

MINUTES

Page 637, line 24, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by 

$1,000,000)’’. 

Page 629, line 19, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by 

$1,000,000)’’. 

32 

105. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE OMAR OF

MINNESOTA OR HER DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

At the end of division E (before the short title), insert the following: 

SEC. ll. None of the funds made available by this Act may be 

used by the Secretary of Energy to make a guarantee under section 

1703 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 16513) for a 

project that does not avoid, reduce, or sequester air pollutants or 

anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases. 

106. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE LEE OF

NEVADA OR HER DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 635, line 12, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by $3,000,000)’’. 

Page 637, line 24, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by $3,000,000)’’. 

107. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE ROUDA

OF CALIFORNIA OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 611, line 15, after the first dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by $5,000,000) (increased by $5,000,000)’’. 

108. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE GARCI ́A

OF ILLINOIS OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 631, line 22, after the first dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by $5,000,000)’’. 

Page 629, line 19, after the first dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by $5,000,000)’’. 

109. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE LEVIN

OF CALIFORNIA OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 649, line 9, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by $500,000) (increased by $500,000)’’. 

110. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE CRAIG

OF MINNESOTA OR HER DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 610, line 23, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by $1,000,000)’’. 

Page 613, line 13, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by 

$1,000,000)’’. 

Page 615, line 16, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by 

$2,500,000)’’. 

111. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE CRAIG

OF MINNESOTA OR HER DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 611, line 15, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by $7,500,000)(increased by $7,500,000)’’. 

33 

112. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE

MCADAMS OF UTAH OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 620, line 14, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(increased by 

$5,000,000)’’. 

Page 621, line 16, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by 

$4,000,000)’’. 

Page 625, line 6, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by 

$2,000,000)’’. 

113. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE LEVIN

OF MICHIGAN OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 611, line 15, after the dollar amount, insert ‘‘(reduced by 

$30,000,000)(increased by $30,000,000)’’. 

PART B—TEXT OF AMENDMENTS TO DIVISION A (LABOR, HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES, AND EDUCATION, AND RELATED AGENCIES) MADE

IN ORDER

1. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE POCAN OF

WISCONSIN OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

At the end of division A (before the short title), insert the following: 

SEC. ll. None of the funds made available by this Act may be 

used to convene an ethics advisory board authorized under section 

492A of the Public Health Service Act with regard to research 

grant applications or current research projects in the competitive 

renewal process that propose to use human fetal tissue. 

2. AN AMENDMENT TO BE OFFERED BY REPRESENTATIVE PASCRELL

JR. OF NEW JERSEY OR HIS DESIGNEE, DEBATABLE FOR 10 MINUTES

Page 68, line 9, before the period insert the following: ‘‘Provided 

further, That of the amount made available under this heading and not reserved by the preceding provisos, $10,000,000 shall be made 

available to carry out section 7091 of the SUPPORT for Patients 

and Communities Act (Public Law 115–271)’’. 

Æ