alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014102EN.01001402.xml

| 7.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 102/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 102/14

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (The Netherlands) lodged on 13 January 2014 — Staatssecretaris van Financiën v D. G. Kieback

(Case C-9/14)

2014/C 102/19

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Applicant:

Defendant: D. G. Kieback

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Must Article 39 EC be interpreted as meaning that the Member State where a taxable person engages in paid employment is, when charging income tax, to take the personal and family circumstances of the interested party into account in circumstances where (i) that taxable person only worked for a part of the tax year in that Member State while living in another Member State, (ii) he received all, or almost all, of his income for that period in that State of employment, (iii) he has left, in the course of the relevant year, to live and work in another State, and (iv) when the tax year is considered as a whole, he did not receive all, or almost all, of his income in the first-mentioned State of employment? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must Article 39 EC be interpreted as meaning that the Member State where a taxable person engages in paid employment is, when charging income tax, to take the personal and family circumstances of the interested party into account in circumstances where (i) that taxable person only worked for a part of the tax year in that Member State while living in another Member State, (ii) he received all, or almost all, of his income for that period in that State of employment, (iii) he has left, in the course of the relevant year, to live and work in another State, and (iv) when the tax year is considered as a whole, he did not receive all, or almost all, of his income in the first-mentioned State of employment?

| 2. | Does it make a difference to the answer to the first question whether the State where the worker has gone to live and work during the course of the tax year is not a Member State of the European Union? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Does it make a difference to the answer to the first question whether the State where the worker has gone to live and work during the course of the tax year is not a Member State of the European Union?

---
# C_2016156EN.01003601.xml

| 2.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/36

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 March 2016 — Xinyi PV Products (Anhui) Holdings v Commission

(Case T-586/14) (1)

1

((Dumping - Imports of solar glass originating in the People’s Republic of China - Definitive anti-dumping duty - Market Economy Treatment (MET) - Article 2(7)(b) and (c), third indent, of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 - Significant distortion arising from the former non-market economy system - Tax incentives))

(2016/C 156/46)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Xinyi PV Products (Anhui) Holdings Ltd (Anhui, China) (represented by: Y. Melin and V. Akritidis, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn and T. Maxian Rusche, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for the annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 470/2014 of 13 May 2014 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of solar glass originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ 2014 L 142, p. 1, with corrigendum in OJ 2014 L 253, p. 4).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 470/2014 of 13 May 2014 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of solar glass originating in the People’s Republic of China in so far as it concerns Xinyi PV Products (Anhui) Holdings Ltd; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 470/2014 of 13 May 2014 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of solar glass originating in the People’s Republic of China in so far as it concerns Xinyi PV Products (Anhui) Holdings Ltd;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 372, 20.10.2014.

1

---
# C_2014212EN.01004702.xml

| 7.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 212/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 212/47

---

Action brought on 20 May 2014 — ZZ and ZZ v Commission

(Case F-47/14)

2014/C 212/62

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ and ZZ (represented by: J.-N. Louis, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decisions concerning the transfer of the applicants’ pension rights to the European Union pension scheme applying the new GIP on Articles 11 and 12 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations and an order that the Commission compensate the applicants for the loss caused to them as a result of the delayed handling of their requests to transfer their pension rights, arising due to the application of the GIP on Article 11 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of 3 March 2011 rather than that of 28 April 2004.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare Article 9 of the General Implementing Provisions of Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations unlawful and inapplicable; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare Article 9 of the General Implementing Provisions of Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations unlawful and inapplicable;

| — | Annul the decisions of 15 and 24 October 2013 calculating the bonus to the pension rights acquired by the applicants before their entry into service, in the transfer thereof into the EU institutions pension scheme by application of the general implementing provisions on Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of 3 March 2011; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decisions of 15 and 24 October 2013 calculating the bonus to the pension rights acquired by the applicants before their entry into service, in the transfer thereof into the EU institutions pension scheme by application of the general implementing provisions on Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of 3 March 2011;

| — | Order the Commission to compensate the applicants for the loss caused to them as a result of the delayed handling of their requests to transfer their pension rights, arising due to the application of the GIP on Article 11 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of 3 March 2011 rather than that of 28 April 2004; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to compensate the applicants for the loss caused to them as a result of the delayed handling of their requests to transfer their pension rights, arising due to the application of the GIP on Article 11 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of 3 March 2011 rather than that of 28 April 2004;

| — | Order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
#### § 660.43 Potency test.

To be satisfactory for release, each filling of Hepatitis B Surface Antigen shall be tested against the Reference Hepatitis B Antiserum Panel and shall be sufficiently potent to be able to detect the antibody in the appropriate sera of the reference panel by all test methods recommended by the manufacturer in the package insert.
Editorial Note on Part 862
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 862 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 862.1610 Pregnanetriol test system. ( a ) *Identification.* A pregnanetriol test system is a device intended to measure pregnanetriol (a precursor in the biosynthesis of the adrenal hormone cortisol) in urine. Measurements obtained by this device are used in the diagnosis and treatment of congenital adrenal hyperplasia (congenital enlargement of the adrenal gland).
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 862.9.
[52 FR 16122, May 1, 1987, as amended at 65 FR 2308, Jan. 14, 2000]
#### § 601.8 Publication of revocation.

The Commissioner, following revocation of a biologics license under 21 CFR 601.5(b), will publish a notice in the Federal Register with a statement of the specific grounds for the revocation.

[74 FR 20585, May 5, 2009]
# C_2014292EN.01006001.xml

| 1.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 292/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 292/60

---

Action brought on 18 April 2014 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-36/14)

2014/C 292/77

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: C. Bernard-Glanz and A. Blot, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the Commission decisions, firstly, rejecting the application for extension of the applicant’s service and, secondly, confirming his automatic retirement on 1 June 2014.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision adopted by the Appointing Authority on 28 March 2014, together with the decision of the Director-General of DG ENTR of 7 April 2014, rejecting the application for extension of the applicant’s service and, accordingly, confirming his automatic retirement on 1 June 2014; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision adopted by the Appointing Authority on 28 March 2014, together with the decision of the Director-General of DG ENTR of 7 April 2014, rejecting the application for extension of the applicant’s service and, accordingly, confirming his automatic retirement on 1 June 2014;

| — | Remedy the losses which have resulted or may result from the contested decisions; |
| --- | --- |

—

Remedy the losses which have resulted or may result from the contested decisions;

| — | Order the Commission to pay the costs |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs

---
Reserve RD Quemado RD

S A Cr.

¬«12

æäB

006

æäB

080 æäB

007

æäB

012

Dillon

Mountain

8694

Mess Box

Mesa

7743

Freeman

Mountain

8773

Higgins

Mountain

6486

Prairie

Point Peak

8333

Negrohead

Butte

7887

Monument

Mountain

8333

Bill Lewis

Mesa

7260

Bar N L

Mesa

8136

Red

Butte

8123

Bar NL

Mesa

7644

124

33

35

762

125

34

119

761

San

Francisco R.

Centerfire

Cr.

San

Francisco R.

4027 J

4029

4027 I

4031 N

4029 Y

4042 M

GRIFFIN

4030 E

35 F

35 H

4134 Q

4027 H

4161 I

4136

T

4031 M

4136 P

4131 H

4031

431

T

5

4131 M

4029

Z

SU CANYON

4029

E

4271 C

4042 P

CENTERFIRE BOG LINK

4030 J

4029 G

4131 B

4031 X

4032

F

4030 O

4028 F

4319

F

35

G

4131 J

4000 O

4271 W

SUBSTATION

4030 K

4271

E

35 D

4271 Q

4028

K

4029 I

CENTERFIRE

BOG

LINK

4029 O

4027 W

SPUR TRAIL DRAW

4271

D

4040

4030 X

4136

F

4030 D

4029 L

4271

K

4030

S

4131

F

4027 K

4136

I

4027 X

427

F

1

4027

V

4131 C

4027

Y

4161

S

FUNDERBURG TRAIL

4030

Q

4271

N

4271 V

4136 U

BALKIE

TAN

K

4131

Q

3027

4030 U

4271 J

4029 L

4179 M

4030 Y

4030 T

4271 R

4161 U

4030 V

4136 V

MCCARTY

4031 G

4130 Y

4271 A

4029

F

4271 Z

BALKIE

TANK

4026 V

4028 Z

4027 Y

4031 F

3026

FRISCO DIVIDE

ELECTRONIC

SITE

J

T

P

ANK

4027

E

4017 A

4028 G

4131 G

3023

4031

H

FRISCO

BOX ROAD

4028 C

4033 K

4042 O

4029 B

4031 B

GRIBBLE ROAD

SPUR RANCH ROAD

4030 H

4129 Y

4027 V

4030 G

4133 Y

4028 Q

4027 U

4028

P

4032 A

4029 F

4131 K

4040 D

4025 P

HUDSON

RANCH

ROAD

4040 Z

MAL

PAIS

SPRIN

G

4029 M

4028 N

4029 A

4028 Y

CENTERFIRE

BOG LINK

4029 J

3022

4029 H

LANY

SPRING

4030 W

4030 I

TORIETTE LAKE

4136 S

4136 R

4027 L

4027 Z

DRY

STARKWEATHER

CANYON

J T S

PARK

HIGHLAND

Figure 8d: Road and trail

proposals.

LUNA RESTORATION PROJECT: FIGURE 8d

0 1 2

Miles

Created On: 5/13/2016 3:12:10 PM

Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 12NTransverse Mercator

o 1 in = 1 miles

1:65,000

(printed on 11" x 17" portrait layout)

Created By: jjelacic

The USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender

Ranger District Boundary

Forest Roads

New ATV Dillman Connector

Open and Convert to ATV

User Created ATV

Decommission

Reopen to Motor Vehicles

Temporary Roads

Highway

Improved Road, Paved

Improved Road, Gravel

Luna Planning Area

Luna (185,586 ac.)

! City/Town

Stream

Highway

Improved Road, Paved

Improved Road, Gravel

County Boundary

US Forest Service

FS Wilderness

Bureau of Land Mgmt.

Private

State

!9 Campground

Non-motorized Trail

Continental Divide NST

Motorized Trail

Roads to Trails

Administrative

Use Roads
621 P.2d 307

#### Jane ROMAN, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Robert CARROLL and Grace Carroll, husband and wife, Defendants/Appellees.

No. 2 CA-CIV 3748.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2.

Dec. 19, 1980.

Law Offices of O’Neill & Martin by J. Dan O’Neill, Tucson, for plaintiff/appellant.

Slutes, Browning, Zlaket & Sakrison, P. C., by Mark R. Riegel, Tucson, for defendants/appellees.

*399OPINION

RICHMOND, Judge.

The question on this appeal is whether a plaintiff can recover damages for emotional distress she suffered from watching defendants’ St. Bernard dismember plaintiff’s poodle while she was walking the dog near her home. The poodle died two days later. In her action for damages, plaintiff/appellant alleges that she suffered severe emotional shock from witnessing the incident and that, at the time, she considered herself in danger of attack by the St. Bernard. She appeals from a summary judgment denying her damages for emotional distress.1

Appellant contends that she is entitled to a trial on the question of damages for negligent infliction of emotional distress because her relationship with her pet poodle was a close one within the meaning of *Keck v. Jackson,*122 Ariz. 114, 593 P.2d 668 (1979). The supreme court in *Keck*held that under certain circumstances a person may recover damages for negligent infliction of emotional distress caused by witnessing injury to a third person. A dog, however, is personal property. A.R.S. § 1-215(25); *State v. Hernandez,*121 Ariz. 544, 592 P.2d 378 (App. 1979). Damages are not recoverable for negligent infliction of -emotional distress from witnessing injury to property. *See, e. g., State v. Baltimore Transit Co.,*197 Md. 528, 80 A.2d 13, 28 A.L.R.2d 1062 (App. 1951).

Affirmed.

HATHAWAY, C. J., and HOWARD, J., concur.

1

. The parties stipulated to a judgment of $1,000 “for any and all damages claimed ... for veterinarian expenses, tíurial expenses, value of dog and punitive damages.”
Order entered October 30, 2017

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 17
- 00838
- CR CARL LEVON BURNS, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 195th J udicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F16
- 76243
- N



### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s October 26, 2017 motion for an ext en s ion of tim e to fil e his brief

. We GRANT the motion to the extent we ORDER appellant’s brief filed wi thin thirty days from the date of this order.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsVortex Radiometry: Enabling Frequency Agile CommunicationsExponential proliferation of UAVs and CubeSats puts NASA's high priority communication systems at risk. UAVs and CubeSats are easy to acquire, modify and build, making it extremely likely that some will be used in unauthorized ways. While these systems provide several benefits to society, their increased use also increases the probability of unintentional signal interference, and even deliberate jamming of NASA's communication systems.This paper presents an algorithm to determine 1) when an interference induced fade will occur, 2) how long the fade will persist for and 3) how intense the fade will be. The algorithm requires data collected from Vortex Radiometers (VRs), which probe the RF environment using annular antenna beam patterns. A set of numerical simulations show that a multi-beam VR system can instruct a cognitive antenna to switch between Ka- and X-Band communications, in order to avert interference from small diameter noise sources. Analysis of the simulation results indicate that practical VR systems will require several concentric annular beam patterns, in order to mitigate fades from noise sources of various sizes. The paper concludes by identifying technology challenges that need to be overcome to achieve these capabilities.Document ID20190025481Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsSchemmel, Peter J.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredJune 2, 2019Publication DateMay 1, 2019Subject CategoryCommunications And RadarReport/Patent NumberGRC-E-DAA-TN67032NASA/TM-2019-220209Funding Number(s)WBS: 553323.04.10.09.01.01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.KeywordsOrbital Angular MomentumRadiometryAvailable DownloadsNameType20190025481.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Capital Pacific Holdings, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending August 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven
O. Spelman, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

| |                                                                                                     |                               
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------
| | By:                                                                                                 | /s/     Steven O. Spelman, Jr.
| |                                                                                                    
| | Steven O. Spelman, Jr.Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary
(Principal Financial Officer)

Date: October 15, 2002
<PAGE>   1

                                  EXHIBIT 24.3

                       POWER OF ATTORNEY OF THOMAS W. FIFE


         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned, Thomas W. Fife,
hereby constitutes and appoints Peter A. Allen or Gordon A. Gardiner his true
and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, for him and his name, place and stead, in
any and all capacities, to sign the Registration Statement on Form S-3 of Data
Dimensions, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and any amendments or supplements
thereto, and to file this Power of Attorney and the Form S-3, with all exhibits
thereto, and other documents in connection therewith with the Securities and
Exchange Commission and the Nasdaq National Market System, granting unto said
attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform each and
every thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as
fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby
ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent may do or
cause to be done by virtue hereof.

         Dated this 4th day of March, 1999.

Signature:


/s/ Thomas W. Fife
------------------------------
Thomas W. Fife



                                     III-7
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM AVITAR'S
QUARTERLY  REPORT FOR THE QUARTER  ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS  QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>1000



<S> .................................................. <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                         OCT-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                           MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                   1,488,213
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              806,685
<ALLOWANCES>                                                90,000
<INVENTORY>                                                425,358
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         2,737,458
<PP&E>                                                   1,320,307
<DEPRECIATION>                                             974,957
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           5,982,154
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    1,687,944
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                 20,634
<COMMON>                                                   280,322
<OTHER-SE>                                               3,878,006
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             5,982,154
<SALES>                                                  1,620,209
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         1,620,209
<CGS>                                                    1,344,976
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            4,613,155
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          42,425
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         (2,999,456)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     (2,999,456)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                            (2,999,456)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                   (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 (.13)


</TABLE>