Executive Budget Summary

FUNCTION 150 & 

OTHER INTERNATIONAL 

PROGRAMS 

FISCAL YEAR 2014
This page intentionally left blank.
THE SECRETARY OF STATE 

WASHINGTON 

April 10,2013 

My former colleague on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Vice President Joseph 

Biden, is fond of saying: "Don't tell me what you value - show me your budget, and I'll tell you 

what you value." Like all budgets, the one that follows is a reflection of priorities and hard 

choices in a difficult fiscal environment. Like all previous budgets for the Department of State 

and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), those priorities include proactive 

diplomacy, effective development, sustainable prosperity, the search for lasting peace, and 

principled American leadership in the world. 

For FY 2014, I submit our budget following particularly careful consideration of one 

more urgent priority: the purposeful and efficient use of taxpayers' money. 

Senator Lindsey Graham, my friend from South Carolina, correctly described America's 

foreign policy investments as "national security insurance." Deploying diplomats today is much 

cheaper than deploying troops tomorrow. No investment matches the returns we collect on the 

down payment we make in our foreign policy. In fact, for just over one percent of our national 

budget- a single penny on the dollar - we fund our civilian foreign affairs efforts: every 

embassy, every consulate, and the programs and people that carry out our missions. That 

relatively small investment is a remarkably cost-effective way of creating jobs, reaching new 

allies, and strengthening old ones. Over time, these investments more than pay for themselves. 

For example, 11 of our top 15 trading partners used to be beneficiaries of U.S. foreign assistance; 

today, they are our economic partners in innovation and diplomacy alike. We create a new 

American job for every $200,000 of goods and services American companies export, and another 

job for every 65 visitors our officers abroad help come to our shores through visa approvals as 

part of our responsibility as the first line in border security. 

America remains the "indispensable nation." The world does not admire our GDP alone. 

It also looks to our leadership to ensure security and stability around the globe, advance human 

rights, foster democracy, promote equality, reduce poverty, protect against the dangers of climate 

change, and improve health and nutrition. Congresswoman Nita Lowey put it clearly when she 

wrote, "The foreign aid bill's diplomatic and development objectives pay dividends by helping 

avoid military deployments to protect U.S. interests ... " 

We closely examined the investments requested below with a steely-eyed determination 

to guarantee the best value for Americans' dollars. We support the highest priorities and reduce 

funding for efforts that can sustain themselves by other means or have outlived their necessity. 

As may be expected in the clash between a shrinking world and shrinking budgets, this request 

required many tough choices. In making these choices, we factored in the cost of abandoning 

our global efforts. Thoughtless cuts would create a vacuum that would quickly be filled by those 
- 2-

whose interests differ dramatically and dangerously from our own – a lesson we have too often 

learned too late.

President Obama is correct that there is nothing in the current budget environment – 

difficult though it is – requiring us to make bad decisions that would force us to retrench or 

retreat within ourselves. This is a time to continue to engage, for the sake of the safety and 

economic health of our country. How we conduct our foreign policy matters to our everyday 

lives – not just in terms of the threats we face, but in the products we buy, the goods we sell, the 

jobs we create, and the opportunities we provide for economic growth and vitality. It is not just 

about whether we will be compelled to send our troops into another battle, but whether we will 

be able to send our graduates into a thriving workforce. Rep. Kay Granger asked the right 

question, “How do we achieve our goals, and how do we make a difference?” 

It is also important to remember that foreign assistance is not charity or a favor we do for 

other nations. It is a strategic imperative for America. It lifts others up, and then reinforces their 

willingness to link arms with us in common endeavors. When we help other nations crack down 

on corruption, it makes it easier for our companies to do business, as well as theirs. When we 

join with other nations to reduce the nuclear threat, we build partnerships that mean we do not 

have to fight these battles alone. When we help others create the space they need to build 

stability in their own fragile countries, we are helping brave people build a better, more 

democratic future – and making sure we do not pay more later, including in American lives.

I am keenly aware of the challenge inherent in justifying these long-term goals, as they 

do not disproportionally benefit a single, powerful interest group, and they might not always bear 

fruit immediately. As President Ronald Reagan lamented, foreign aid “suffers from 

a lack of domestic constituency.” That is why we need you, the Congress, to take the long view 

and support these small investments that time and again prove to yield huge dividends. Having 

spent 29 years in the Senate, I know firsthand that so many of my former colleagues have a 

deeply personal understanding of the difference these investments can make. I know this 

because I served with people like Senator Jesse Helms, who came to believe so passionately in 

the cause of saving millions from AIDS in Africa; and Senator John McCain, who helped to 

change our country’s entire relationship with a former enemy, Vietnam; and others in Congress 

who travel often to war torn countries or devote their own time to the concerns of sick and 

impoverished people around the globe. The critics who say the Congress does not care about the 

hope the United States can bring to the hopeless around the world, simply do not know the 

character and conviction of this Congress. As my long time friend and colleague Pat Leahy said 

about the work of the foreign operations subcommittee, “This panel is where American values 

are put into action and funding decisions are made to advance our national security interests, to 

improve the lives of the world’s poor, and to make the world safer, healthier, cleaner and more 

prosperous.” 

This year, our budget request for the Department of State and USAID totals $47.8 billion, 

a six percent reduction from FY 2012. These funds are a strategic investment in our core 

mission of advancing America’s national security and economic interests. We owe it to the 

American people to do our part to help solve the fiscal problems that threaten not only our future 

economic health but also our standing in the global order. As such, we have proposed necessary 
- 3-

cuts, where it will not adversely affect our national security, and we propose modest increases, 

where they are necessary to achieve our highest priorities. In the end, this budget strikes the 

balance between fiscal discipline and sustaining and advancing America’s global leadership 

– and is six percent less than in FY 2012. 

The FY 2014 Executive Budget Summary highlights funding required for State and 

USAID to carry out our missions worldwide. This also includes the Annual Performance Report 

for FY 2012 and the Annual Performance Plan for FY 2014. 

Advancing Peace, Security, and Stability 

Our investments in diplomacy and development help prevent wars, reduce the threat of 

nuclear weapons, secure our borders and protect Americans abroad. The men and women of the 

State Department and USAID serve on the front lines, including in the most dangerous corners of 

the world, protecting and advancing American interests and countering violent extremism. 

Knowing that failed states are among our greatest security threats and new partners are our 

greatest assets, we advance civilian power, lessening the need for costly military intervention 

that risks the lives of our soldiers and citizens. 

Around the world, our work to prevent conflict today will help ensure that we do not 

have to deploy troops tomorrow. From Libya to the Balkans to Afghanistan, our security 

assistance helps partners and allies to defend themselves and deter attacks, while working to 

ensure that dangerous weapons, including Man-portable Air Defense Systems (MANPADS), are 

secured or destroyed to keep them from falling into terrorists’ hands. Our engagement in 

international organizations helps to advance these interests abroad, sustaining relationships with 

key partners and supporting critical peacekeeping operations that bring peace and security 

around the world (where other nations’ troops also are engaged). When conflicts do arise, the 

highly trained staff of the Department and USAID, including in our Bureaus of Conflict and 

Stabilization Operations and Democracy, Conflict and Humanitarian Assistance, serve on the 

front lines alongside our troops, protecting and advancing American interests, mitigating crises, 

and helping to craft whole-of-government solutions to the challenges the United States faces. 

This budget enables us to respond to the dynamic political, economic, and social shifts 

we see around the world. While Europe remains seized with managing continued financial 

difficulties, it is also our strongest partner in countering some of our toughest challenges in 

Africa and the Middle East. Securing our national interests in the 21st century will increasingly 

depend on developing strong and flexible partnerships with nations, civil society organizations, 

and other nontraditional players. Whether it is partnering with Mexico and Colombia to 

dismantle transnational criminal networks or coordinating with the international community to 

ensure the stability and security of the Korean peninsula, we need the resources and authorities to 

protect the American people and effectively engage our partners. This budget answers that call 

by supporting both our allies in nascent democratic transitions from previously authoritarian 

nations and our long-standing friends. It funds partnerships with multilateral organizations, 

sustaining peacekeeping operations around the world, including in Sudan and Somalia, and 

supporting efforts to use new tools to engage with people – as well as governments. 
- 4-

In particular, as the political landscape of the Middle East continues to shift, the 

United States must actively engage the people and governments in the region. The Arab 

Spring has given way to free elections in Egypt, Libya, and Tunisia, but also unleashed some 

uncertain forces. As Syrians struggle for the right of self-determination against an authoritarian 

and violent regime, and as Egypt works to address severe economic challenges, the United States 

has an essential role to play. We must support these transitions, forging relationships with newly 

elected governments and building partnerships with the citizens who will shape their countries’ 

futures. This request maintains our longstanding commitments to key regional allies, including 

Israel, Jordan, and Egypt. Also included is $580 million for the Middle East and North Africa 

Incentive Fund, designed to provide support for political reform, free and fair elections, 

democratic institutions, transparent and accountable government, transitional justice, open 

markets, and inclusive growth. 

We are rebalancing our strategic relationship across East Asia and the Pacific region 

through deeper economic engagement, strengthened multilateral engagement, enhanced 

security cooperation, and a renewed emphasis on democracy and human rights. Our FY 2014 

budget increases assistance to the region by more than seven percent from FY 2012 to support 

programs like the Lower Mekong Initiative, and encourage democratic development, with a 

primary focus on advancing reform and national reconciliation in Burma. 

Of course, while we have made great strides in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq, our 

work there is far from complete. Today, our military is home from Iraq and transition is 

underway in Afghanistan, but America’s commitment to the people of these proud countries will 

not waver. We are requesting less than in past years, but it remains crucial that we continue 

robust funding to sustain the gains we have achieved. We must manage a successful military-tocivilian transition in Afghanistan, invest in the people of Pakistan, and continue to engage in the 

critical components of long-term stability in Iraq. 

FY 2014 will witness the final stages of the security transition from American to Afghan 

forces and begin the longer term diplomatic and assistance transition for the Department and 

USAID. Our request for Afghanistan is $3.1 billion, including $2.2 billion in assistance and 

$0.9 billion to support embassy operations in Kabul and a diplomatic presence in other regions of 

the country. We will focus on sustainable development and meeting the U.S. commitments 

made at the Afghanistan Conference in Tokyo in July 2012. 

Our economic and military assistance to Pakistan helps to reduce the conditions that 

enable extremism and its calling card – terrorism – to disrupt and destroy. We are helping 

Pakistan continue its development as a responsible and responsive international partner. Our 

FY 2014 request for Pakistan totals $1.3 billion, funding civilian and military assistance and 

supporting the existing diplomatic platform. 

In Iraq, we continue to reduce the scale of our mission to a sustainable diplomatic and 

development presence. Our $1.8 billion request supports operations across the country; the

construction of a new consulate in Erbil, which will provide a more safe, secure, and permanent 

platform in Northern Iraq; and targeted assistance programs, which will focus on issues 

important to U.S. national interests, including developing democratic institutions, protecting 
- 5-

vulnerable populations, and improving rule of law. As we seek diplomatic normalization, we 

have avoided costs by scaling our footprint to a smaller, more sustainable level. We also 

anticipate that the Government of Iraq will continue to assume greater responsibility for its 

development funding requirements, as oil revenues increase. 

Strengthening Our Economy While Combating Global Challenges 

Now more than ever, our foreign policy affects the threats we face, the products we buy, 

the goods we sell, and the opportunity for economic growth and vitality. The State Department 

and USAID are committed to leveraging our unmatched global reach – our network of 

diplomatic outposts and relationships with global decision-makers in government and business 

– to advance America’s traditional national security interests, as well as to support economic 

renewal here at home. To do this, we must continue to address global challenges, including 

hunger, disease, extreme poverty, and the destabilizing effects of climate change. We promote 

economic development and lay the foundation for prosperous societies. We must support the 

rise of new allies to help solve regional and global problems and protect our own nation’s 

security and prosperity. 

We promote exports and stand up for American businesses abroad, helping them 

navigate foreign regulations, settle disputes, and compete for foreign government and private 

contracts. We negotiate international agreements and treaties to open new markets for American 

goods and services overseas. We work with foreign companies to attract investment to the 

United States. In addition, our diplomats and development experts work to help nations to 

realize their own potential, develop their own ability to govern, and become our future economic 

partners.

We are engaging with our traditional allies, and with emerging centers of power and 

commerce, to ensure that peoples, economies, and governments are positioned to tackle 

tomorrow’s challenges. Together, we help countries break the cycle of poverty, poor nutrition, 

and hunger. We defend the universal rights of all people and help to advance freedom and 

dignity around the world. We promote education – for girls and boys – helping to ensure that 

everyone has the opportunity to lift themselves up. 

We are fighting disease and hunger – not only because it is the right thing to do, but 

also because it is a smart way to promote stability and global prosperity. That is why our 

global health programs have traditionally received strong bipartisan support. With this budget, 

we support high-impact AIDS prevention, care, and treatment programs in pursuit of an AIDSfree generation; support the major determinants of child and maternal mortality – maternal and 

child health, malaria prevention, family planning, and nutrition – in an attempt to end 

preventable child and maternal deaths; and provide treatment and prevention against other 

infectious diseases in developing countries. 

We are improving the way we use assistance to promote our values and our interests. 

For example, food aid continues to be a critical response to populations most in need. Our 

budget proposes reforms to our largest food aid program, to ensure that the United States can 

respond most effectively to humanitarian crises and chronic food insecurity within current 
- 6-

budget constraints, while reaching an estimated two to four million more people in need each 

year. The reform will make food aid more cost-effective and improve program efficiency and 

performance. The proposal shifts resources to USAID assistance programs to allow the use of 

the right tools to respond to emergencies and chronic food insecurity, including interventions 

such as local and regional procurement and cash vouchers. At the same time, the majority of 

emergency food aid will be U.S. agricultural commodities. Without our current cash-based food 

aid resources, we could not have responded to the Syrian crisis. The proposal also strengthens 

our ability to address chronic poverty and build resilience in vulnerable populations. The reform

reduces mandatory spending – and the deficit – by an estimated $500 million over a decade. 

We are seizing on pivotal opportunities to promote stability by building resilience to 

disasters and boosting agriculture production, raising the incomes of the poor, increasing 

availability of food, and reducing under-nutrition. The United States will join G-8 and African 

leaders to achieve sustained and inclusive agricultural growth and raise fifty million people out 

of poverty over the next ten years. These programs will stimulate private investments in African 

agriculture, take to scale innovations that can enhance agricultural productivity, and support 

economic resilience efforts in the Sahel and Horn of Africa. 

In recent years, the world has seen a dramatic rise in the number of people affected by 

conflict or natural disasters. It bears repeating that, when tragedy and terror visit our neighbors 

around the globe - whether through man-made or natural occurrences, many nations give of 

themselves to help; but only the United States is expected to do so. In FY 2014, our 

humanitarian assistance will help to address the crises in and around Syria, the Horn of Africa, 

and the Sahel. It will also address inevitable unforeseen challenges. 

We must have the foresight and courage to make the investments necessary to 

safeguard the most sacred trust for our children and grandchildren: an environment not 

ravaged by rising seas, deadly superstorms, devastating droughts, and the other hallmarks of a 

dramatically changing climate. Our programs related to global climate change will work with 

other major economies to improve the resilience of countries that are most vulnerable to climate 

and weather-related disasters; support fast-growing economic and regional leaders in their 

transition to clean energy; and limit greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation and forest 

degradation. If we do not help countries invest in a clean environment, rising temperatures and 

rising sea levels will surely lead to rising costs for the United States down the road. 

We remain focused on seeking gender equality and empowering women and girls. 

Countries are more peaceful and prosperous when women and girls are afforded full rights and 

equal opportunity. When women are able to fully participate in all aspects of public life, they 

can drive democratic, social, political, and economic progress not just for themselves, but for 

entire societies. In 2014, we are requesting resources to enable our missions to create initiatives 

that more fully integrate gender issues into U.S. program and policies. 

Our People and Platform

The people of the Department of State and USAID need the right tools to confront the 

complex national security and foreign policy challenges facing our nation. The practice of 
- 7-

foreign policy is changing, whether it is reaching out directly to people of other nations through 

new technologies or ensuring that our diplomats are as fluent in economics as they are in the 

world’s languages. This means making investments now in the people and platforms that will 

provide us with the foundation for our vital mission now and in the future. Most importantly, 

this means ensuring that the men and women who work and live at more than 280 posts in almost 

every country on the planet are safe and secure. 

From Manila to Bogota to Nairobi, our diplomats and development experts are doing 

more than ever to keep America safe and prosperous – and doing it with fewer resources. We 

have reinvigorated our alliances and strengthened multilateral solutions to shared challenges. 

We have deepened our diplomatic and economic engagement with regional powers, while 

continuing to press forward on issues such as human rights, nonproliferation, and open and free 

trade. 

We request a moderate increase in staffing to position America for global leadership in 

the next decade and beyond. The requested staffing level will be able to support the rebalancing 

in Asia, helping to bolster economic security and prosperity in the region; strengthen USAID’s 

civil service capacity in support of USAID Forward reforms; permit the construction projects 

necessary to ensure safe and secure facilities for our personnel overseas; and put in place 

additional safeguards necessary to address the cybersecurity threat to our nation. 

As always, we are constantly challenging ourselves to do better. For example, USAID 

Forward was designed to strengthen USAID by embracing new partnerships, investing in the 

catalytic role of innovation, and demanding a relentless focus on results. This budget continues 

strong support for these initiatives, including an increase in funding for applied research and 

other science and technology applications that will help USAID create transformative solutions 

to persistent development challenges, contributing to the goal of eradicating extreme poverty in 

the next two decades.

As we carry out these vital missions, we must provide the men and women who work 

and live at our posts the safe and secure environment they need to do their jobs. The past year 

presented new challenges, including a terrorist attack in Benghazi that took the life of our 

Ambassador and three other Americans. Building on the lessons of the independent Benghazi 

Accountability Review Board, this request includes nearly $4.4 billion to help us prevent such 

tragedies in the future, in particular by improving funding for facilities and security personnel 

worldwide. This funding would accelerate construction of up to as many as ten new, secure 

diplomatic facilities, and would provide for the security of diplomatic and consular personnel, 

property, and information. 

This security funding will enable us to address vulnerabilities at our highest threat posts, 

recognizing that many of these locations are where our presence is most needed. While we 

recognize this is a significant request in a constrained fiscal environment, insufficient resources 

to secure our people and harden our infrastructure could have devastating consequences for our 

people and for America’s global leadership. 
- 8-

Since I became Secretary of State, I have talked about the new conversation we need to 

have at home - as a country- about the importance of our foreign policy and national security 

investments. I do so well aware - as a "recovering politician" - that there is no greater 

guaranteed applause line than to promise to cut the State Department and USAID's budget. I am 

equally aware, however, that underfunding American diplomacy does nothing to guarantee our 

security, build a sounder economy, or ensure that another young American in uniform will not 

die fighting a preventable war. I reject the excuse that Americans are just not interested in what 

America does overseas. In fact, the real domestic constituency for what we do, if we connect the 

dots for them as an Administration and a Congress, should be the 314 mi Ilion Americans whose 

lives are better every day because of what America does overseas, and who know that our 

investment abroad actually makes them and our nation safer. It is our job to connect those dots, 

to connect, for the American people, how what we do "over there" has an enormous impact 

"over here." Signature of John F. Kerry is imaged below.
Executive Budget Summary 

FUNCTION 150 & 

OTHER INTERNATIONAL 

PROGRAMS 

FISCAL YEAR 2014 
This page intentionally left blank. 
i 

Executive Budget Summary

Table of Contents 

FY 2014 INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS REQUEST 

Summary Budget Table ...................................................................................... 1 

Statement of Performance .................................................................................. 6 

ENDURING PROGRAMS ................................................................................................ 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE AND RELATED AGENCIES 

Summary Table .............................................................................................................. 10 

I. Department of State 

A. Administration of Foreign Affairs 

Diplomatic and Consular Programs ..................................................................... 12 

IT Central Fund ................................................................................................... 19 

Border Security Program ..................................................................................... 22 

Working Capital Fund .......................................................................................... 27 

Embassy Security, Construction, and Maintenance ............................................ 28 

Conflict Stabilization Operations ........................................................................ 30 

Office of Inspector General ................................................................................. 32 

Educational and Cultural Exchange Programs .................................................... 33 

Representation Allowances ................................................................................. 36 

Protection of Foreign Missions and Officials ...................................................... 37 

Emergencies in the Diplomatic and Consular Service ........................................ 38 

Buying Power Maintenance Account .................................................................. 39 

Repatriation Loans Program Account ................................................................. 40 

Payment to the American Institute in Taiwan ..................................................... 41 

Foreign Service Retirement and Disability Fund ................................................ 42 

International Chancery Center .............................................................................. 43 

B. International Organizations 

Contributions to International Organizations ...................................................... 44 

Contributions for International Peacekeeping Activities ..................................... 48 

C. International Commissions (Function 300) 

International Boundary and Water Commission 

IBWC – Salaries and Expenses .............................................................. 51 

IBWC – Construction ............................................................................. 51 

American Sections 

International Joint Commission .............................................................. 52 

International Boundary Commission ...................................................... 52 

Border Environment Cooperation Commission ..................................... 52 

International Fisheries Commissions .................................................................. 53 
ii

D. Related Programs 

The Asia Foundation ........................................................................................... 55 

Center for Middle Eastern-Western Dialogue ..................................................... 56 

Eisenhower Exchange Fellowship Program ........................................................ 57 

Israeli Arab Scholarship Program ....................................................................... 58 

East-West Center ................................................................................................. 59 

National Endowment for Democracy ................................................................... 60 

E. Related Agencies 

Broadcasting Board of Governors 

International Broadcasting Operations ................................................... 61 

Broadcasting Capital Improvements ...................................................... 61 

United States Institute of Peace ........................................................................... 62 

FOREIGN OPERATIONS AND RELATED PROGRAMS 

Summary Table .............................................................................................................. 63 

II. United States Agency for International Development 

USAID Operating Expenses ................................................................................ 66 

USAID Capital Investment Fund ........................................................................ 68 

USAID Inspector General Operating Expenses .................................................. 69 

III. Bilateral Economic Assistance 

A. Bilateral Economic Assistance 

Global Health Programs ...................................................................................... 70 

Development Assistance ..................................................................................... 77 

International Disaster Assistance ........................................................................ 82 

Emergency Food Assistance Contingency ........................................................... 84 

Transition Initiatives ............................................................................................ 85 

Complex Crises Fund .......................................................................................... 86 

Development Credit Authority ............................................................................ 87 

Economic Support Fund ...................................................................................... 88 

Middle East and North Africa Incentive Fund .................................................... .97 

Migration and Refugee Assistance .................................................................... 100 

U.S. Emergency Refugee and Migration Assistance Fund ............................... 102 

B. Independent Agencies 

Peace Corps ....................................................................................................... 103 

Millennium Challenge Corporation ................................................................... 104 

Inter-American Foundation ............................................................................... 106 

African Development Foundation ..................................................................... 107 

C. Department of the Treasury 

Treasury Technical Assistance and Debt Restructuring .................................... 108 

IV. International Security Assistance 

International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement ..................................... 109 

Nonproliferation, Anti-terrorism, Demining and Related Programs ................. 115 

Peacekeeping Operations .................................................................................. 118 
iii

International Military Education and Training .................................................. 121 

Foreign Military Financing ............................................................................... 123 

Global Security Contingency Fund ................................................................... 125 

Special Defense Acquisition Fund .................................................................... 126 

V. Multilateral Economic Assistance .......................................................................... 127 

International Organizations and Programs ........................................................ 128 

Multilateral Development Banks ....................................................................... 129 

VI. Export and Investment Assistance 

Export-Import Bank of the United States .......................................................... 132 

Overseas Private Investment Corporation ......................................................... 133 

U.S. Trade and Development Agency ............................................................... 135 

COMMERCE, JUSTICE, SCIENCE, AND RELATED AGENCIES 

International Trade Commission ....................................................................... 136 

Foreign Claims Settlement Commission ........................................................... 137 

AGRICULTURE, RURAL DEVELOPMENT, FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, 

AND RELATED AGENCY 

Department of Agriculture 

McGovern-Dole International Food for Education ........................................... 138 

OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS (OCO) ........................................... 139 

Summary Table ............................................................................................................ 140 

Overview ........................................................................................................................ 142 

Department of State 

Diplomatic and Consular Programs-OCO ......................................................... 143 

Embassy Security, Construction and Maintenance-OCO................................... 145 

Office of Inspector General-OCO ..................................................................... 146 

United States Agency for International Development 

USAID Operating Expenses-OCO ..................................................................... 147 

Bilateral Economic Assistance 

Economic Support Fund-OCO ........................................................................... 148 

International Security Assistance 

International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement–OCO .......................... 150 

Foreign Military Financing-OCO ...................................................................... 152 
iv

APPENDIX: ACCOUNT TABLES 

Global Health Programs-USAID ........................................................................ 154 

Global Health Programs-State ............................................................................ 156 

Development Assistance ..................................................................................... 158 

Economic Support Fund ...................................................................................... 160 

Migration and Refugee Assistance & 

Emergency Refugee and Migration Assistance Fund ................................... 163 

Middle East and North Africa Incentive Fund ..................................................... 164 

International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement ...................................... 165 

Nonproliferation, Anti-terrorism, Demining and Related Programs ................... 168 

Peacekeeping Operations .................................................................................... 169 

International Military Education and Training ................................................... 170 

Foreign Military Financing ................................................................................. 173 

International Organizations and Programs .......................................................... 176
FY 2012 

Enduring Actual

FY 2012 OCO 

Actual

FY 2012 Actual 

Total

FY 2013 CR 

Enduring1

FY 2013 CR 

OCO1

FY 2013 CR 

Total1

FY 2014 Request 

Enduring

FY 2014 

Request OCO

FY 2014 

Request Total

Change from FY 

2012 Actual to FY 

2014 Request

INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS (Function 150) and International 

Commissions (Function 300) 43,289,158 11,202,787 54,491,945 43,640,900 11,202,787 54,843,687 48,272,587 3,807,341 52,079,928 (2,412,017)

INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS (Function 150 Account) Only 43,164,996 11,202,787 54,367,783 43,515,978 11,202,787 54,718,765 48,151,625 3,807,341 51,958,966 (2,408,817)

Total - State Department and USAID (including 300) 39,675,337 11,188,424 50,863,761 39,887,058 11,188,424 51,075,482 43,982,133 3,807,341 47,789,474 (3,074,287)

STATE OPERATIONS & RELATED ACCOUNTS 13,222,948 4,627,457 17,850,405 13,258,997 4,627,457 17,886,454 15,212,905 1,499,141 16,712,046 (1,138,359)

STATE OPERATIONS 12,445,229 4,614,646 17,059,875 12,476,519 4,614,646 17,091,165 14,446,138 1,499,141 15,945,279 (1,114,596)

Administration of Foreign Affairs 8,890,006 4,513,346 13,403,352 8,899,539 4,513,346 13,412,885 10,525,308 1,499,141 12,024,449 (1,378,903)

 State Programs 6,617,261 4,306,364 10,923,625 6,636,998 4,389,064 11,026,062 7,359,263 1,199,491 8,558,754 (2,364,871)

 Diplomatic and Consular Programs2 6,557,881 4,306,364 10,864,245 6,577,255 4,389,064 10,966,319 7,282,363 1,199,491 8,481,854 (2,382,391)

 Ongoing Operations 5,202,881 4,070,163 9,273,044 5,222,011 4,152,863 9,374,874 5,491,189 808,530 6,299,719 (2,973,325)

 Worldwide Security Protection 1,355,000 236,201 1,591,201 1,355,244 236,201 1,591,445 1,791,174 390,961 2,182,135 590,934

 Capital Investment Fund 59,380 - 59,380 59,743 - 59,743 76,900 - 76,900 17,520

 Embassy Security, Construction, and Maintenance2 1,537,000 115,700 1,652,700 1,546,406 33,000 1,579,406 2,399,351 250,000 2,649,351 996,651

 Ongoing Operations 762,000 115,700 877,700 766,663 33,000 799,663 785,351 250,000 1,035,351 157,651

 Worldwide Security Upgrades 775,000 - 775,000 779,743 - 779,743 1,614,000 - 1,614,000 839,000

 Other Administration of Foreign Affairs 735,745 91,282 827,027 716,135 91,282 807,417 766,694 49,650 816,344 (10,683)

 Conflict Stabilization Operations (CSO) 21,816 8,500 30,316 - 8,500 8,500 45,207 - 45,207 14,891

 Office of the Inspector General 61,904 67,182 129,086 62,283 67,182 129,465 69,406 49,650 119,056 (10,030)

 Educational and Cultural Exchange Programs 583,200 15,600 598,800 586,769 15,600 602,369 562,659 - 562,659 (36,141)

 Representation Allowances 8,030 - 8,030 7,345 - 7,345 7,679 - 7,679 (351)

 Protection of Foreign Missions and Officials 27,750 - 27,750 27,165 - 27,165 28,200 - 28,200 450

 Emergencies in the Diplomatic and Consular Services 9,073 - 9,073 9,357 - 9,357 9,652 - 9,652 579

 Buying Power Maintenance Account - - - - - - - - -

 Repatriation Loans Program Account 1,674 - 1,674 1,456 - 1,456 1,700 - 1,700 26

 Payment to the American Institute in Taiwan 21,778 - 21,778 21,237 - 21,237 36,221 - 36,221 14,443

 International Chancery Center3 520 - 520 523 - 523 5,970 - 5,970 5,450

 Foreign Service Retirement and Disability Fund [158,900] - [158,900] [158,900] - [158,900] [158,900] - [158,900] -

International Organizations 3,277,882 101,300 3,379,182 3,297,942 101,300 3,399,242 3,668,115 - 3,668,115 288,933

 Contributions to International Organizations (CIO) 1,449,700 101,300 1,551,000 1,458,572 101,300 1,559,872 1,573,454 - 1,573,454 22,454

 Contributions for International Peacekeeping Activities (CIPA) 1,828,182 - 1,828,182 1,839,370 - 1,839,370 2,094,661 - 2,094,661 266,479

Related Programs 153,179 - 153,179 154,116 - 154,116 131,753 - 131,753 (21,426)

 The Asia Foundation 17,000 - 17,000 17,104 - 17,104 17,000 - 17,000 -

STATE OPERATIONS and FOREIGN ASSISTANCE REQUEST

($000)

1
FY 2012 

Enduring Actual

FY 2012 OCO 

Actual

FY 2012 Actual 

Total

FY 2013 CR 

Enduring1

FY 2013 CR 

OCO1

FY 2013 CR 

Total1

FY 2014 Request 

Enduring

FY 2014 

Request OCO

FY 2014 

Request Total

Change from FY 

2012 Actual to FY 

2014 Request

STATE OPERATIONS and FOREIGN ASSISTANCE REQUEST

($000)

 Center for Middle Easter-Western Dialogue 840 - 840 845 - 845 90 - 90 (750)

 Eisenhower Exchange Fellowship Program 500 - 500 503 - 503 400 - 400 (100)

 Israeli Arab Scholarship Program 375 - 375 377 - 377 13 - 13 (362)

 East-West Center 16,700 - 16,700 16,802 - 16,802 10,800 - 10,800 (5,900)

 National Endowment for Democracy 117,764 - 117,764 118,485 - 118,485 103,450 - 103,450 (14,314)

International Commissions (Function 300) 124,162 - 124,162 124,922 - 124,922 120,962 - 120,962 (3,200)

 International Boundary and Water Commission - Salaries and Expenses 44,722 - 44,722 44,996 - 44,996 45,618 - 45,618 896

 International Boundary and Water Commission - Construction 31,453 - 31,453 31,645 - 31,645 31,400 - 31,400 (53)

 American Sections 11,687 - 11,687 11,759 - 11,759 12,499 - 12,499 812

 International Joint Commission 7,012 - 7,012 7,055 - 7,055 7,664 - 7,664 652

 International Boundary Commission 2,279 - 2,279 2,293 - 2,293 2,449 - 2,449 170

 Border Environment Cooperation Commission 2,396 - 2,396 2,411 - 2,411 2,386 - 2,386 (10)

 International Fisheries Commissions 36,300 - 36,300 36,522 - 36,522 31,445 - 31,445 (4,855)

Broadcasting Board of Governors 747,130 4,400 751,530 751,702 4,400 756,102 731,080 - 731,080 (20,450)

 International Broadcasting Operations 740,100 4,400 744,500 744,629 4,400 749,029 722,580 722,580 (21,920)

 Broadcasting Capital Improvements 7,030 - 7,030 7,073 - 7,073 8,500 - 8,500 1,470

Other Programs 30,589 8,411 39,000 30,776 8,411 39,187 35,687 - 35,687 (3,313)

 United States Institute of Peace 30,589 8,411 39,000 30,776 8,411 39,187 35,687 - 35,687 (3,313)

FOREIGN OPERATIONS 28,929,910 6,575,330 35,505,240 29,121,805 6,575,330 35,697,135 32,874,556 2,308,200 35,182,756 (322,484)

U.S Agency for International Development 1,268,500 259,500 1,528,000 1,276,264 259,500 1,535,764 1,500,340 71,000 1,571,340 43,340

 USAID Operating Expenses (OE) 1,092,300 255,000 1,347,300 1,098,985 255,000 1,353,985 1,328,200 71,000 1,399,200 51,900

 Conflict Stabilization Operations (CSO) - - - - - - - - - -

 USAID Capital Investment Fund (CIF) 129,700 - 129,700 130,494 - 130,494 117,940 - 117,940 (11,760)

 USAID Inspector General Operating Expenses 46,500 4,500 51,000 46,785 4,500 51,285 54,200 - 54,200 3,200

Bilateral Economic Assistance 16,995,584 3,834,516 20,830,100 16,994,155 3,177,016 20,171,171 20,045,626 1,382,200 21,427,826 597,726

 Global Health Programs (USAID and State)4 8,172,660 - 8,172,660 8,217,847 - 8,217,847 8,315,000 - 8,315,000 142,340

 Global Health Programs - USAID [2,629,800] - [2,629,800] [2,641,065] - [2,641,065] [2,645,000] - [2,645,000] [15,200]

 Global Health Programs - State [5,542,860] - [5,542,860] [5,576,782] - [5,576,782] [5,670,000] - [5,670,000] [127,140]

 Development Assistance (DA) 2,519,950 - 2,519,950 2,535,372 2,535,372 2,837,812 - 2,837,812 317,862

 International Disaster Assistance (IDA)5 825,000 270,000 1,095,000 830,049 150,000 980,049 2,045,000 - 2,045,000 950,000

 Emergency Food Assistance Contingency Fund - - - - - - 75,000 - 75,000 75,000

 Transition Initiatives (TI)6 50,141 43,554 93,695 50,448 6,554 57,002 57,600 - 57,600 (36,095)

 Complex Crises Fund (CCF)5 10,000 40,000 50,000 10,061 30,000 40,061 40,000 - 40,000 (10,000)

 Development Credit Authority - Subsidy (DCA) [40,000] - [40,000] [40,000] [40,000] [40,000] - [40,000] -

 Development Credit Authority - Administrative Expenses 8,300 - 8,300 8,351 - 8,351 8,200 - 8,200 (100)

 Economic Support Fund (ESF)5, 6, 7 2,994,745 3,151,962 6,146,707 2,912,461 2,761,462 5,673,923 4,076,054 1,382,200 5,458,254 (688,453)

 Middle East and North Africa Incentive Fund - - - - - - 580,000 - 580,000 580,000

2
FY 2012 

Enduring Actual

FY 2012 OCO 

Actual

FY 2012 Actual 

Total

FY 2013 CR 

Enduring1

FY 2013 CR 

OCO1

FY 2013 CR 

Total1

FY 2014 Request 

Enduring

FY 2014 

Request OCO

FY 2014 

Request Total

Change from FY 

2012 Actual to FY 

2014 Request

STATE OPERATIONS and FOREIGN ASSISTANCE REQUEST

($000)

 Democracy Fund 114,770 - 114,770 115,472 - 115,472 - - - (114,770)

 Assistance for Europe, Eurasia and Central Asia (AEECA) 626,718 - 626,718 630,554 - 630,554 - - - (626,718)

 Migration and Refugee Assistance (MRA)5 1,646,100 329,000 1,975,100 1,656,174 229,000 1,885,174 1,760,960 - 1,760,960 (214,140)

 U.S. Emergency Refugee and Migration Assistance (ERMA) 27,200 - 27,200 27,366 - 27,366 250,000 - 250,000 222,800

Independent Agencies 1,325,700 - 1,325,700 1,333,813 - 1,333,813 1,319,100 - 1,319,100 (6,600)

 Peace Corps 375,000 - 375,000 377,295 - 377,295 378,800 - 378,800 3,800

 Millennium Challenge Corporation 898,200 - 898,200 903,697 - 903,697 898,200 - 898,200 -

 Inter-American Foundation 22,500 - 22,500 22,638 - 22,638 18,100 - 18,100 (4,400)

 African Development Foundation 30,000 - 30,000 30,184 - 30,184 24,000 - 24,000 (6,000)

Department of Treasury 37,448 1,552 39,000 37,677 1,552 39,229 23,500 - 23,500 (15,500)

 Treasury Technical Assistance 25,448 1,552 27,000 25,604 1,552 27,156 23,500 - 23,500 (3,500)

 Debt Restructuring 12,000 - 12,000 12,073 - 12,073 - - - (12,000)

International Security Assistance 7,269,819 2,479,762 9,749,581 7,314,309 3,137,262 10,451,571 7,669,384 855,000 8,524,384 (1,225,197)

 International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement (INCLE)6, 7 1,061,100 574,605 1,635,705 1,067,594 983,605 2,051,199 1,129,727 344,000 1,473,727 (161,978)

 Nonproliferation, Antiterrorism, Demining and Related Programs (NADR)6 590,113 121,157 711,270 593,724 120,657 714,381 616,125 - 616,125 (95,145)

 Peacekeeping Operations (PKO)5, 6 302,818 207,000 509,818 304,671 81,000 385,671 347,000 - 347,000 (162,818)

 International Military Education and Training (IMET) 105,788 - 105,788 106,435 - 106,435 105,573 - 105,573 (215)

 Foreign Military Financing (FMF) 5,210,000 1,102,000 6,312,000 5,241,885 1,102,000 6,343,885 5,445,959 511,000 5,956,959 (355,041)

 Pakistan Counterinsurgency Capability Fund (PCCF)5 - 452,000 452,000 - 850,000 850,000 - - - (452,000)

 Global Security Contingency Fund5 - 23,000 23,000 - - - 25,000 - 25,000 2,000

 Special Defense Acquisition Fund - - - - - - - - - -

Multilateral Economic Assistance 2,966,293 - 2,966,293 2,989,277 - 2,989,277 3,196,424 - 3,196,424 230,131

 International Organizations and Programs4 343,905 - 343,905 350,839 - 350,839 320,645 - 320,645 (23,260)

International Financial Institutions (IFIs) 2,622,388 - 2,622,388 2,638,438 - 2,638,438 2,875,779 - 2,875,779 253,391

 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development 117,364 - 117,364 118,083 - 118,083 186,957 - 186,957 69,593

 International Development Association (IDA) 1,325,000 - 1,325,000 1,333,109 - 1,333,109 1,358,500 - 1,358,500 33,500

 African Development Bank 32,418 - 32,418 32,616 - 32,616 32,418 - 32,418 -

 African Development Fund (AfDF) 172,500 - 172,500 173,556 - 173,556 195,000 - 195,000 22,500

 Asian Development Bank 106,586 - 106,586 107,238 - 107,238 106,586 - 106,586 -

 Asian Development Fund 100,000 - 100,000 100,612 - 100,612 115,250 - 115,250 15,250

 Inter-American Development Bank 75,000 - 75,000 75,459 - 75,459 102,020 - 102,020 27,020

 Inter-American Investment Corporation 4,670 - 4,670 4,699 - 4,699 - - - (4,670)

 Enterprise for the Americas Multilateral Investment Fund 25,000 - 25,000 25,153 - 25,153 6,298 - 6,298 (18,702)

 IDA Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative 167,000 - 167,000 168,022 - 168,022 145,300 - 145,300 (21,700)

 AfDF Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative 7,500 - 7,500 7,546 - 7,546 30,000 - 30,000 22,500

 Global Environment Facility (GEF) 89,820 - 89,820 90,370 - 90,370 143,750 - 143,750 53,930

 Clean Technology Fund 184,630 - 184,630 185,760 - 185,760 215,700 - 215,700 31,070

 Strategic Climate Fund 49,900 - 49,900 50,205 - 50,205 68,000 - 68,000 18,100

 International Fund for Agricultural Development 30,000 - 30,000 30,184 - 30,184 30,000 - 30,000 -

3
FY 2012 

Enduring Actual

FY 2012 OCO 

Actual

FY 2012 Actual 

Total

FY 2013 CR 

Enduring1

FY 2013 CR 

OCO1

FY 2013 CR 

Total1

FY 2014 Request 

Enduring

FY 2014 

Request OCO

FY 2014 

Request Total

Change from FY 

2012 Actual to FY 

2014 Request

STATE OPERATIONS and FOREIGN ASSISTANCE REQUEST

($000)

 Global Agriculture and Food Security Program 135,000 - 135,000 135,826 - 135,826 135,000 - 135,000 -

 Middle East and North Africa Transition Fund - - - - - - 5,000 - 5,000 5,000

Export & Investment Assistance (1,015,434) - (1,015,434) (906,192) - (906,192) (967,138) - (967,138) 48,296

 Export-Import Bank (799,700) - (799,700) (752,925) - (752,925) (831,600) - (831,600) (31,900)

 Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC) (265,734) - (265,734) (203,573) - (203,573) (198,200) - (198,200) 67,534

 Trade and Development Agency 50,000 - 50,000 50,306 - 50,306 62,662 - 62,662 12,662

Related International Affairs Accounts 82,000 - 82,000 82,502 - 82,502 87,320 - 87,320 5,320

 International Trade Commission 80,000 - 80,000 80,490 - 80,490 85,102 - 85,102 5,102

 Foreign Claims Settlement Commission 2,000 - 2,000 2,012 - 2,012 2,218 - 2,218 218

Department of Agriculture 1,650,000 - 1,650,000 1,660,098 - 1,660,098 185,126 - 185,126 (1,464,874)

 Food for Peace Act Title II 1,466,000 - 1,466,000 1,474,972 - 1,474,972 - - - (1,466,000)

 McGovern-Dole International Food for Education and Child Nutrition Programs 184,000 - 184,000 185,126 - 185,126 185,126 - 185,126 1,126

Rescissions

Total Rescissions State Operations (13,700) - (13,700) - - - - - - 13,700

 Diplomatic & Consular Programs (D&CP) (13,700) - (13,700) - - - - - - 13,700

 Ongoing Operations Worldwide (5,700) - (5,700) - - - - - - 5,700

 Worldwide Security Protection (8,000) - (8,000) - - - - - - 8,000

 Buying Power Maintenance Account - - - - - -

Total Rescissions Foreign Operations (500,000) - (500,000) (400,000) - (400,000) - - - 500,000

Bilateral Economic Assistance (100,000) - (100,000) - - - - - - 100,000

 Economic Support Fund (ESF) (100,000) - (100,000) - - - - - - 100,000

Export & Investment Assistance (400,000) - (400,000) (400,000) - (400,000) - - - 400,000

 Export-Import Bank (400,000) - (400,000) (400,000) - (400,000) - - - 400,000

Footnotes

7/ The FY 2012 OCO Actual level reflects the transfer of $10 million from the Economic Support Fund to the International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement account.

3/ Reflects scoring of obligations from the International Chancery Center Trust Fund, as included in the FY 2014 President’s Budget Appendix. Proposed appropriations language for this project is based on the Diplomatic and Consular Programs fees and 

payments provisions of Division I, Title I of Public Law 112-74.

6/ The FY 2012 OCO Actual level reflects the transfer of $409 million from the International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement account to the Economic Support Fund ($285.5 million), Transition Initiatives ($37 million), Nonproliferation, Antiterrorism, 

Demining and Related Programs ($0.5 million), Peacekeeping Operations ($86 million) accounts.

4/ The FY 2012 Enduring Actual level reflects the transfer of $4.8 million from the International Organizations and Programs account to the Global Health Programs-USAID account.

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175).

5/ The FY 2012 OCO Actual level reflects the transfer of $398 million from the Pakistan Counterinsurgency Capability Fund to the Economic Support Fund ($105 million), Global Security Contingency Fund ($23 million), Complex Crises Fund ($10 million), 

Peacekeeping Operations ($40 million), International Disaster Assistance ($120 million) and Migration and Refugee Assistance ($100 million) accounts.

2/ FY 2012 Actual includes the transfer of $82.7 million from Diplomatic and Consular Programs OCO funds for the Embassy Compound in Baghdad. 

4
This page intentionally left blank. 

5
Statement of Performance

Performance Analysis

The Department of State and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) have made great 

strides to develop relevant, measureable, and outcome oriented indicators, and to assess progress against 

prior-year performance through trend data. The Congressional Budget Justification (CBJ) submission 

serves as the Department’s and USAID’s FY 2014 Annual Performance Plan and FY 2012 Annual 

Performance Report. The results of efforts to improve strategic planning and performance management 

throughout the Department and USAID, both domestically and at the Missions, are detailed in the 

accompanying State Operations and Foreign Assistance volumes of the CBJ.

Department of State-USAID Agency Priority Goals 

Through the Quadrennial Diplomacy and Development Review, the Department of State and USAID 

developed a strategic approach to accomplishing their shared mission, focusing on robust diplomacy and 

development as central components to address global challenges. State and USAID submitted eight 

outcome-focused Agency Priority Goals (APGs) that reflect the Secretary’s and USAID Administrator’s 

highest priorities. These near-term goals advance the Joint Strategic Goals, reflect USAID and State 

strategic and budget priorities, and will continue to be of particular focus for the two agencies through FY 

2013. In FY 2014, the Department and USAID will develop new APGs that are outcome-based goals that 

reflect the Secretary’s and Administrator’s highest priorities through FY 2015. 

In addition to quarterly reporting to OMB on the status of meeting key milestones and performance 

targets for each APG, the GPRA Modernization Act requires that APG goal owners meet with senior 

agency leadership to assess performance data, discuss successes and challenges, and identify any actions 

necessary to ensure goal achievement. A process has been developed for conducting joint data-driven 

reviews for State-USAID APGs that brings together goal leaders with the Deputy Secretary of State and 

the USAID Assistant Administrator. Goal owners are assisted in the preparation of presentation materials 

with feedback from State and USAID Performance Improvement Officers as well as by a support team 

comprised of staff from the Office of Foreign Assistance Resources and the Bureau of Budget and 

Planning.

The APGs are listed below under the applicable joint Department of State-USAID Strategic Goal. A more 

comprehensive table is featured in both State Operations and Foreign Assistance volumes of the CBJ. 

Agency Priority 

Goal

Goals

Strategic Goal 2: Effectively manage transitions in the frontline states.

Afghanistan Goal: With mutual accountability, assistance from the United States and the 

international community will continue to help improve the Government of the 

Islamic Republic of Afghanistan's (GIRoA) capacity to meet its goals and maintain 

stability. Bonn Conference commitments call on GIRoA to transition to a 

sustainable economy, namely improve revenue collection, increase the pace of 

economic reform, and instill a greater sense of accountability and transparency in 

all government operations. These efforts will strengthen Afghanistan's ability to 

maintain stability and development gains through transition. By September 30, 

2013, U.S. Government assistance delivered will help the Afghan government 

increase the level of domestic revenue from sources such as customs and electrical 

tariffs from 10 percent to 12 percent of gross domestic product. 

6
Strategic Goal 3: Expand and sustain the ranks of prosperous, stable and democratic states by 

promoting effective, accountable, democratic governance; respect for human rights; sustainable, 

broad-based economic growth; and well-being.

Democracy, Good 

Governance, and 

Human Rights 

Goal: Advance progress toward sustained and consolidated democratic transitions 

in Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco, Tunisia, Libya, Bahrain, Yemen, Iran, Syria, 

and West Bank/Gaza. By September 30, 2013, support continued progress toward 

or lay the foundations for transitions to accountable electoral democracies in 11 

countries in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) that respect civil and 

political liberties and human rights.

Climate Change Goal: Advance low emissions climate resilient development. Lay the groundwork 

for climate-resilient development, increased private sector investment in a low 

carbon economy, and meaningful reductions in national emissions trajectories 

through 2020 and the longer term. By the end of 2013, U.S. assistance to support 

the development and implementation of Low Emission Development Strategies 

(LEDS) will reach 20 countries (from a baseline of 0 in 2010). This assistance will 

be strategically targeted and will result in strengthened capacity for and 

measureable progress on developing and implementing LEDS by the end of the 

following year.

Food Security Goal: Increase food security in Feed the Future (FTF) initiative countries in order 

to reduce prevalence of poverty and malnutrition. By the end of FY 2013, 

agricultural profitability will improve, on average, by 15% among FTF beneficiary 

farmers, and one million children under age 2 will experience improved nutrition 

due to increased access to and utilization of nutritious foods (prevalence of 

receiving a minimum acceptable diet).

Global Health Goal: By September 30, 2013, the Global Health Initiative (GHI) will support the 

creation of an AIDS-free generation, save the lives of mothers and children, and 

protect communities from infectious diseases by: a) decreasing incidence of HIV 

infections in the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR)-

supported sub-Saharan African countries by more than 20 percent; b) reducing the 

all-cause mortality rate for children under five by 4 deaths/1,000 live births in 

USAID priority countries; c) increasing the percent of births attended by a skilled 

doctor, nurse, or midwife by 2.1 percent in USAID priority countries; and d) 

increasing the number of people no longer at risk for lymphatic filariasis (in the 

target population) from 7.7 million to 63.7 million in USAID-assisted countries.

Strategic Goal 5: Support American prosperity through economic diplomacy.

Economic 

Statecraft 

Goal: Through our more than 200 diplomatic missions overseas, the Department 

of State will promote U.S. exports in order to help create opportunities for U.S. 

businesses. By September 30, 2013, our diplomatic missions overseas will 

increase the number of market-oriented economic and commercial policy activities 

and accomplishments by 15 percent. 

7
Strategic Goal 7: Build a 21st Century workforce; and achieve U.S. government operational and 

consular efficiency and effectiveness, transparency and accountability; and a secure US 

government presence internationally.

Management Goal: Strengthen diplomacy and development by leading through civilian power. 

By September 30, 2013, the State Department and USAID will reduce vacancies in 

high priority positions overseas to 0% and 10% respectively and will reduce 

instances of employees not meeting language standards to 24% and 10% 

respectively.

Procurement 

Management/Local 

Development 

Partners

Goal: Strengthen local civil society and private sector capacity to improve aid 

effectiveness and sustainability, by working closely with our implementing 

partners on capacity building and local grant and contract allocations. By 

September 30, 2013, USAID will expand local development partners from 746 to 

1200. 

Per the GPRA Modernization Act, 31 U.S.C. 1115(b)(10), requirement to address Federal Goals in the 

Strategic Plan and Annual Performance Plan, please refer to www.performance.gov for information on 

Federal Priority Goals and the agencies’ contributions to those goals, where applicable. 

Program Evaluation 

Program evaluation is an essential component to implementing diplomatic and development programs and 

initiatives. Evaluations allow project managers to better understand their programs and give policy 

makers a tool to assess the capacity of a particular program or sector. 

The Department of State and USAID have made major progress in putting in place frameworks for 

implementation of performance and impact evaluations and streamlined performance metrics that support 

evidence-based analysis and active use of performance information, including information from 

evaluations. The evaluations are used to determine what is working and what is not, and in turn provide 

evidence for programmatic and budgetary decisions. 

Consistent with findings and recommendations of the QDDR, the Department and USAID are in the 

process of significantly modifying its approach to the annual planning, budgeting and performance 

management cycle. This new framework links the various aspects of: (1) planning; (2) budgeting; (3) 

program management; and (4) monitoring and evaluation to maximize the impact of Department of State 

resources. A stronger emphasis on evidence is also incorporated within the different processes that make 

up this framework.

USAID released an updated program Evaluation Policy in January 2011 as part of its USAID Forward

agenda, and the Department released its first ever Department-wide program and operations evaluation 

policy in 2012. 

While these and other changes are in the early phases of implementation, progress to date has been 

positive. 

8
FY 2014 INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS

ENDURING PROGRAMS

9
Department of State 

Summary of Appropriations 

Enduring Budget 

($ in thousands) FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 Increase /

Actual CR1/ Request Decrease

Administration of Foreign Affairs 8,890,006 8,899,539 10,525,308 1,635,302

State Programs 6,617,261 6,636,998 7,359,263 742,002

Diplomatic and Consular Programs2/ 6,557,881 6,577,255 7,282,363 724,482

Ongoing Operations 5,202,881 5,222,011 5,491,189 288,308

Worldwide Security Protection 1,355,000 1,355,244 1,791,174 436,174

Capital Investment Fund 59,380 59,743 76,900 17,520

Embassy Security, Construction, and Maintenance3/1,537,000 1,546,406 2,399,351 862,351

Ongoing Operations 762,000 766,663 785,351 23,351

Worldwide Security Upgrades 775,000 779,743 1,614,000 839,000

Other Administration of Foreign Affairs 735,745 716,135 766,694 30,949

Conflict Stabilization Operations4/21,816 - 45,207 23,391

Office of Inspector General5/ 61,904 62,283 69,406 7,502

Educational and Cultural Exchange Programs 583,200 586,769 562,659 -20,541

Representation Allowances6/ 8,030 7,345 7,679 -351

Protection of Foreign Missions and Officials7/ 27,750 27,165 28,200 450

Emergencies in the Diplomatic and Consular Service 9,073 9,357 9,652 579

Buying Power Maintenance Account8/- - - -

Repatriation Loans Program Account 1,674 1,456 1,700 26

Payment to the American Institute in Taiwan9/ 21,778 21,237 36,221 14,443

Foreign Service Retirement and Disability Fund (non-add)10/ 158,900 158,900 158,900 0

International Chancery Center11/520 523 5,970 5,450

0 0 0 0

International Organizations 3,277,882 3,297,942 3,668,115 390,233

Contributions to International Organizations 1,449,700 1,458,572 1,573,454 123,754

Contributions for International Peacekeeping Activities 1,828,182 1,839,370 2,094,661 266,479

0 0 0 0

International Commissions (Function 300) 124,162 124,922 120,962 -3,200

International Boundary and Water Commission - S&E 44,722 44,996 45,618 896

International Boundary and Water Commission - Construction 31,453 31,645 31,400 -53

American Sections 11,687 11,759 12,499 812

International Joint Commission 7,012 7,055 7,664 652

International Boundary Commission 2,279 2,293 2,449 170

Border Environment Cooperation Commission 2,396 2,411 2,386 -10

International Fisheries Commissions 36,300 36,522 31,445 -4,855

0 0 0 0

Related Programs 153,179 154,116 131,753 -21,427

The Asia Foundation 17,000 17,104 17,000 -

Center for Middle Eastern-Western Dialogue12/ 840 845 90 -750

Eisenhower Exchange Fellowship Program13/ 500 503 400 -100

Israeli Arab Scholarship Program14/ 375 377 13 -363

East-West Center 16,700 16,802 10,800 -5,900

National Endowment for Democracy 117,764 118,485 103,450 -14,314

0 0 0 0

TOTAL, Department of State Appropriations 12,445,229 12,476,519 14,446,138 2,000,909

10
Summary of Appropriations Footnotes: 

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175). 

2/ FY 2012 Actual reflects the following transfers: $30.9 million transferred from the Buying Power Maintenance Account; $670,000 transferred to 

the Payment to the American Institute in Taiwan; $730,000 transferred to Representation Allowances; $750,000 transferred to the Protection of 

Foreign Missions and Operations; and $21.8 million transferred to Conflict Stabilization Operations (CSO). 

3/ FY 2012 Actual includes the transfer of $82.7 million from Diplomatic and Consular Programs for diplomatic facilities in Baghdad.

4/ FY 2012 Actual includes $21.8 million transferred from Diplomatic and Consular Programs. Although not included in the table above, FY 2012 

Actual level is being sustained under the FY 2013 Continuing Resolution through a transfer from D&CP.

 

5/ In FY 2012, FY 2013, and FY 2014, funding for the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) and Special Inspector 

General for Iraq Reconstruction (SIGIR) are included in the Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) chapter. 

6/ FY 2012 Actual and FY 2013 CR include $730,000 transferred from Diplomatic and Consular Programs. 

7/ FY 2012 Actual includes $750,000 transferred from the Worldwide Security Protection account. 

8/ FY 2012 Actual includes $30.9 million transferred to Diplomatic and Consular Programs. FY 2013 CR includes a transfer of $27.5 million to 

Diplomatic and Consular Programs. 

9/ FY 2012 Actual includes $670,000 transferred from the Diplomatic and Consular Programs. 

10/ FY 2012 Actual, FY 2013 CR and FY 2014 Request includes mandatory funding for both the Department of State and USAID. 

11/ Reflects scoring of fee collections from the International Chancery Center Trust Fund, as included in the FY 2014 President’s Budget Appendix. 

Proposed appropriations language for this project is based on the Diplomatic and Consular Programs fees and payments provisions of Division I, 

Title I of Public Law 112-74. 

12/ Amount provided in the conference report to the FY 2012 Appropriations Act; actual interest earned for FY 2012 is $29,592. 

13/ Amount provided in the conference report to the FY 2012 Appropriations Act; actual interest earned for FY 2012 is $326,640. 

14/ Amount provided in the conference report to the FY 2012 Appropriations Act; actual interest earned for FY 2012 is $5,597. 

11
Diplomatic and Consular Programs

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Diplomatic and Consular Programs2/ 14,934,408 15,119,182 9,290,384 -5,644,024

Enduring 6,557,881 6,577,255 7,282,363 724,482

Ongoing Operations 5,202,881 5,222,011 5,491,189 288,308

Worldwide Security Protection 1,355,000 1,355,244 1,791,174 436,174

Overseas Contingency Operations 8,376,527 8,541,927 2,008,021 -6,368,506

Ongoing Operations 4,070,163 4,152,863 808,530 -3,261,633

Worldwide Security Protection 4,306,364 4,389,064 1,199,491 -3,106,873

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175). 

2/ FY 2012 Actual reflects the following transfers: $30.9 million transferred from the Buying Power Maintenance Account; $82.7 million 

transferred to Embassy Security, Construction, and Maintenance; $670,000 transferred to the Payment to the American Institute in Taiwan; 

$730,000 transferred to Representation Allowances; $750,000 transferred to the Protection of Foreign Missions and Operations; and $21.8 million 

transferred to Conflict Stabilization Operations (CSO). 

The FY 2014 enduring budget request for Diplomatic and Consular Programs (D&CP) – the State 

Department’s principal operating appropriation – totals $7.3 billion. This funding provides for the core 

people, infrastructure, and programs that conduct official U.S. relations with foreign governments and 

international organizations, as well as to support U.S. businesses, and reach foreign audiences through 

public diplomacy. The request enables the Department to fulfill its mandates as a national security 

institution and engage other nations worldwide to advance American interests and values. 

D&CP - Ongoing Operations 

The D&CP request provides $5.5 billion for Ongoing Operations. This funding supports essential 

diplomatic personnel and programs worldwide. It also supports the infrastructure for U.S. Government 

agencies and employees at more than 280 diplomatic and consular posts in over 180 countries around the 

globe. Of the requested increases over the 2012 Actual level, $130 million will maintain current services, 

and $159 million supports program changes. 

The current services request preserves D&CP-funded bureaus and programs at their FY2012 operating 

level, supports the transition into newly-constructed overseas facilities, and reflects efficiency savings 

adjustments in support of the President’s focus on fiscal discipline and spending restraint. This funding 

reflects stringent fiscal constraints, as bureaus and programs pursue efficiency savings to offset the impact 

of domestic and overseas inflation. 

Requested program changes continue priority initiatives as well as targeted support for domestic and 

overseas operations. The “Diplomacy 3.0” initiative is continued at a lower rate of growth with funding for 

35 new State Department positions, including 30 Foreign Service positions and 5 Civil Service positions. 

This growth will focus resources on the highest priority countries and programs, and is coupled with 

implementation of diplomatic reforms outlined in the Quadrennial Diplomacy and Development Review 

(QDDR). Other personnel-related increases over FY 2012 include increased consular staffing, and Phase 

III of Overseas Comparability Pay, implementation of the Alternative Retirement Plan for Locally 

Employed Staff, and a realignment of funding for consular positions from the D&CP appropriation to 

12
consular fee revenue. The request includes a total of $501 million for public diplomacy to further 

U.S. foreign policy goals by informing and influencing foreign opinion. Public diplomacy efforts include 

countering misinformation about U.S. society and policies, strengthening relationships between Americans 

and foreign publics, and shaping worldwide information campaigns on issues such as climate change, food 

security, water, and global health. 

D&CP - Category Descriptions 

Human Resources: $2,631.1 million 

These resources will support American Salaries for overseas and domestic positions, the Human Resources 

Bureau, the Foreign Service Institute, continuation of the Diplomacy 3.0 staffing initiative, and the final 

increment of Overseas Comparability Pay. American salary costs for Public Diplomacy and Worldwide 

Security Protection are included in this category. 

Overseas Program: $2,198.5 million 

These resources support the Department's world-wide diplomacy efforts, including the following bureaus 

and offices: African Affairs, East Asian and Pacific Affairs, European and Eurasian Affairs, International 

Organizations Affairs, Office of the Medical Director, Near Eastern Affairs, South and Central Asian 

Affairs, and Western Hemisphere Affairs; as well as related costs for post-assignment travel and local staff 

separation liabilities. This category includes $369 million for bureau-managed Public Diplomacy 

programs and operations. 

Diplomatic Policy and Support: $813.3 million 

These resources support the Department’s central policy and management functions, including the 

following bureaus and offices: Office of the Secretary; Consular Affairs; Democracy, Human Rights, and 

Labor; Political-Military Affairs; International Security and Nonproliferation; Public Affairs; Office to 

Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons; Legislative Affairs; Chief of Protocol; the Under-Secretary for 

Management; Budget and Planning; Comptroller and Global Financial Services; Administration; 

Information Resource Management; Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs; Office 

of Population & International Migration; Arms Control, Verification and Compliance; Economic and 

Business Affairs; Energy Resources; Intelligence and Research; and the Office of the Legal Adviser. 

Security Programs: $1,639.5 million 

These resources provide for the Department’s security programs and policies, including the Bureau of 

Diplomatic Security (DS), the Bureau of Counterterrorism, Office of the Medical Director, Bureau of 

Administration, Bureau of Intelligence and Research, Bureau of International Security and 

Non-Proliferation, Bureau of Information Resource Management, Bureau of Human Resources, regional 

bureaus, the Foreign Service Institute, and the Office of Foreign Missions. This request provides $2.2 

billion, which includes $391 million in OCO funding for WSP to help ensure the security of diplomatic and 

consular personnel, property, and information. WSP funding supports ongoing core functions such as the 

worldwide local guard program, high threat protection needs, security technology, armored vehicles, cyber 

security, and diplomatic couriers. The funding will address security challenges in dangerous places where 

diplomatic operations are most critical. Included in this category is funding for the following, but not 

limited to: 

Effective and Efficient Risk-Based Security: DS will continue to increase efficiency by calling on the 

skills of partner agencies in the design and implementation of joint security efforts. DS will build on 

the successes in researching and developing solutions and technologies that can be leveraged by DS’s 

talented personnel. Further, DS will maximize use of the Department’s performance management 

culture by evaluating large programs in keeping with the Bureau Evaluation Plan stemming from the 

QDDR.

13
Provide Robust and Nimble Information Security Protection: Cyber security is a highly important 

mission. DS stays vigilant in monitoring network traffic, detecting and responding to cyber security 

incidents, ensuring compliance with Department regulations, and identifying potential system security 

vulnerabilities. DS assesses emerging security technologies to protects the Department’s technology 

assets and allow Department users the flexibility needed to keep pace with changing environments. 

Threat Investigation and Analysis (TIA): Diplomatic Security’s TIA directs, coordinates, and 

conducts counterterrorism and protective intelligence investigations and intelligence analysis involving 

terrorist threats, incidents, and/or hostile activities directed against all U.S. Government personnel, 

facilities, and interest abroad under the authority of the Chief of Mission, as well as the Secretary of 

State, Department of State employees and property domestically, U.S. foreign policy interests, and 

foreign diplomatic officials and facilities located in the United States. Through several initiatives and 

programs, including the Overseas Security Advisory Council, the Security Environment Threat List, 

Rewards for Justice, and the Joint Terrorism Task Force, TIA assists foreign governments and private 

companies, as well as other U.S. Government agencies, on issues related to terrorism, both globally and 

domestic. TIA also manages the 24/7 DS Command Center. 

Countermeasures (C): Diplomatic Security’s C leverages the latest physical and technical 

countermeasures for use in facilities around the world that protect against a wide range of security 

threats. The C Directorate is responsible for the management and direction of the development of 

standards, policies, and procedures associated with these technical security issues and 

countermeasures. Moreover, C supports the operability of technical security equipment at all 

Department of State overseas missions using staff at 77 Engineering Services Centers, Offices, and 

Technical Security Offices worldwide. C deploys physical security systems such as armored vehicles, 

blast and ballistic-resistant perimeter guard towers, access controls such as vehicle barriers, anti-climb 

and anti-ram fences; temporary modular protection systems designed to mitigate blast, overhead and 

forced entry/blast resistant threats; vehicular anti-ram barriers; and compound access control 

enclosures. C will continue to innovate, building on the success of such programs as Streetscape 

Vehicular Anti-Ram (SVAR) and Landscape Vehicular Anti-Ram programs. These barriers answered 

an industry-wide call to merge perimeter security with the environment. DS designed and tested 

anti-ram terrain features, boulders, lampposts, bus shelters and benches for this initiative. Other 

development and successful testing include the DS non-proprietary Modular Guard Tower System and 

the Hardened Alternative Trailer System. Finally, the Diplomatic Courier Service will continue to 

provide secure and expeditious delivery of classified and sensitive material to our U.S. missions 

abroad, which no one can replace or duplicate. 

High Threat Posts (HTP) and International Programs (IP): As U.S. diplomacy pursues operations 

outside traditional embassy platforms, DS will provide security support. In light of global events of 

the past year, DS created the HTP directorate. HTP's focus is to provide critical security support for 

employees, information, and facilities at 28 high threat/high risk posts. International Programs is 

responsible for the rest of the world. While HTP and IP handle different posts based on threat level, 

the general duties carried out by the directorates are similar. HTP and IP administer vital security 

programs such as the Local Guard Program, Surveillance Detection, Residential Security, and High 

Threat Protective Details that support the implementation of U.S. foreign policy at overseas missions. 

HTP and IP also work to continue critical contract oversight and management of private security 

contractors working overseas. 

Training (T): Diplomatic Security’s T, in coordination with the Foreign Service Institute, develops 

and implements training and professional development programs for State Department and other 

U.S. Government personnel and dependents deployed overseas. DS will continue to prepare Foreign 

Affairs personnel and other U.S. government personnel posted overseas under Chief of Mission (COM) 

authority for assignments to high threat posts worldwide through the Foreign Affairs Counter Threat 

14
(FACT) course supplemented by a High Threat Overseas Seminar when DS does not have sufficient 

FACT capacity. Through these courses, DS equips foreign affairs personnel with the necessary 

hard-skills to safely operate in the “new normal.” DS will continue to increase the number of DS 

Special Agents trained in the High Threat Tactical Course. DS provides strategic security support 

through its Office of Mobile Security Deployments. Through the Office of Anti-Terrorism 

Assistance, DS builds the law enforcement and counter-terrorism capacities of the Department’s 

partner nations. Through the Weapons of Mass Destruction Countermeasures Program, DS personnel 

train chief of mission employees how to best protect themselves in the event of chemical, biological, 

radiological, or nuclear attack. Additionally, the Department of Homeland Security established DS as 

a Center of Excellence for instructor-led cyber security training in 2010. DS continues its work to 

provide comprehensive role-based cyber security education and training programs to secure 

infrastructure design and development, incident analysis, and defensive skills and capabilities of the 

Department personnel and those of other agencies. 

Security Infrastructure (SI): Diplomatic Security’s SI is responsible for the initial and periodic 

vetting of all employees and contractors whose positions require security clearances, access to sensitive 

intelligence, or public trust certifications; the cyber security of classified and sensitive information 

produced or retained in the Department’s information technology systems; and, the physical/cyber 

security of Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information produced or retained in the Department’s 

intelligence systems and holdings. The Office of Personnel Security and Suitability conducts 36,000 

personnel security investigations each year. The Office of Computer Security ensures the 

Department’s need for a safe and secure communications platform from which to conduct diplomacy. 

The Office protects over 125,000 IT assets at more than 280 overseas posts and 125 domestic offices. 

The Office of Information Security primarily meets the security needs of the Head of the Intelligence 

Community Element at State (INR). The office keeps the Department’s senior leadership informed of 

critical daily intelligence developments. 

Domestic Operations (DO): Diplomatic Security’s DO manages a full spectrum of criminal and 

special investigative resources to include violations of laws regarding U.S. passports and visas, 

defensive counterintelligence programs, and interagency liaison functions in the areas of law 

enforcement and counterintelligence. DO is the entity overseeing the responsibility for the safety and 

security of the Secretary of State, Deputy Secretaries of State, U.S. Permanent Representative to the 

United Nations, certain visiting foreign dignitaries, and other persons of interest. It is also responsible 

for protecting resident foreign diplomatic personnel, embassies, and consulates. DO is the U.S. lead 

for security planning for major international events such as the Olympics, World Cup, and other global 

events attended by Heads of State and other diplomatic dignitaries. DO manages the protective 

security support programs for over 100 Department sites, including numerous annexes in the greater 

Washington area, as well as passport financial, logistical, public affairs, human resources, consular, and 

Office of Foreign Missions offices throughout the United States. 

15
Resource Detail – Funding Categories for D&CP 

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Total, Diplomatic and Consular Programs2/

6,557,881 6,577,255 7,282,363 724,482

Human Resources 2,506,786 2,504,273 2,631,073 124,287

American Salaries, Central Account 2,321,516 2,323,041 2,409,612 88,096

 Public Diplomacy American Salaries

 (non-add)

130,178 130,178 131,713 1,535

 Iraq Operations American Salaries

 (non-add) 

350 350 354 4

 WSP - American Salaries (non-add) 216,963 216,963 255,866 38,903

Foreign Service Institute 76,155 74,101 70,834 -5,321

Human Resources 109,115 107,131 110,909 1,794

Human Resources Initiative - - 39,718 39,718

Overseas Programs 1,970,210 1,990,960 2,198,515 228,305

African Affairs 212,025 227,728 245,136 33,111

Ambassador's Fund for Cultural Preservation 5,750 5,750 5,750 -

East Asian and Pacific Affairs 179,616 186,066 186,630 7,014

European and Eurasian Affairs 358,475 362,608 347,723 -10,752

FSN Separation Liability Trust Fund 38,723 34,128 32,898 -5,825

International Conferences 1,438 3,620 19,193 17,755

International Organization Affairs 24,690 24,491 24,268 -422

Medical Director 24,295 20,053 24,201 -94

Near Eastern Affairs 361,431 361,236 353,146 -8,285

 Iraq Operations (non-add) 205,697 207,444 158,179 -47,518

Post Assignment Travel 179,615 176,904 185,020 5,405

South and Central Asian Affairs 75,139 77,479 232,615 157,476

Western Hemisphere Affairs 169,805 169,322 172,346 2,541

Public Diplomacy 339,208 341,575 369,589 30,381

Diplomatic Policy and Support 813,169 790,471 813,252 83

Administration (including GSA Rent) 340,140 325,104 323,985 -16,155

 GSA Rent (non-add) 157,385 172,492 171,898 14,513

Arms Control, Verification and Compliance 15,397 14,605 14,808 -589

Budget and Planning 3,967 4,813 7,561 3,594

16
($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Chief of Protocol 3,215 2,846 2,888 -327

Comptroller and Global Financial Services 76,443 77,514 79,732 3,289

Consular Affairs (excluding Border Security 

Program)

317 - - -317

Democracy, Human Rights and Labor 7,195 8,335 10,072 2,877

Economic and Business Affairs 7,605 7,236 6,341 -1,264

Energy Resources 5,307 4,422 5,612 305

Information Resource Management 208,811 205,824 209,515 704

Intelligence and Research 20,181 13,666 15,908 -4,273

International Security and Nonproliferation 17,262 17,195 17,212 -50

Legal Advisor 13,423 13,563 13,909 486

Legislative Affairs 2,553 2,458 2,496 -57

Management 4,448 4,496 4,567 119

Oceans and International Environmental and 

Scientific Affairs

13,196 13,196 13,406 210

Political-Military Affairs 9,672 9,685 9,722 50

Population & International Migration 661 657 663 2

Public Affairs 12,588 12,634 12,825 237

Trafficking in Persons 2,236 2,143 2,151 -85

Office of the Secretary 48,552 50,079 59,879 11,327

Security Programs 1,267,716 1,291,551 1,639,523 371,807

Counterterrorism 10,064 13,832 13,666 3,602

Diplomatic Security 111,447 131,265 82,331 -29,116

 Iraq Operations (non-add)

- 21,253 76,077 76,077

Office of Foreign Missions 8,168 8,173 8,218 50

Worldwide Security Protection 1,138,037 1,138,281 1,535,308 397,271

 WSP Current Services - Bureau Managed

 (non-add) 

1,138,037 1,180,380 1,185,953 47,916

 WSP Program Changes (non-add)

- -42,099 349,355 349,355

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175). 

2/ FY 2012 Actual reflects the following transfers: $30.9 million transferred from the Buying Power Maintenance Account; $82.7 million 

transferred to Embassy Security, Construction, and Maintenance; $670,000 transferred to the Payment to the American Institute in Taiwan; 

$730,000 transferred to Representation Allowances; $750,000 transferred to the Protection of Foreign Missions and Operations; and $21.8 million 

transferred to Conflict Stabilization Operations (CSO). 

17
Resource Detail - Highlights of Budget Changes for D&CP 

($ in thousands) D&CP 

Direct

D&CP PD

D&CP 

Ongoing 

Operations 

(Direct & 

PD)

Worldwide 

Security 

Protection

D&CP 

Total

FY 2013 Estimate $4,750,258 $471,753 $5,222,011 $1,355,244 6,577,255

239,629 29,549 269,178 435,930 705,108

Built-in Changes

Base Adjustments 5,983 0 5,983 0 5,983

Facility Operating Cost 5,983 0 5,983 0 5,983

Anticipated Wage & Price

Requirements 88,985 15,363 104,348 49,821 154,169

American COLA 24,541 1,413 25,954 3,344 29,298

Locally Engaged Staff

Wage Increase 31,233 5,535 36,768 16,268 53,036

Locally Engaged Step

Increases 22,329 3,970 26,299 11,692 37,991

Overseas Price Inflation 23,337 3,252 26,589 15,166 41,755

Domestic Inflation 12,499 1,193 13,692 3,313 17,005

Absorption of Current

Services -28,458 0 -28,458 -635 -29,093

GSA Rents 3,504 0 3,504 673 4,177

Total, Built-in Changes 94,968 15,363 110,331 49,821 160,152

239,629 29,549 269,178 435,930 705,108

Total, Current Services 4,845,226 487,116 5,332,342 1,405,065 6,737,407

239,629 29,549 269,178 435,930 705,108

Program Changes

Human Resources 89,891 0 89,891 0 89,891

Overseas Programs 115,307 14,186 129,493 0 129,493

Diplomatic Policy and 

Support 15,636 0 15,636 0 15,636

Security Programs -76,173 0 -76,173 386,109 309,936

Total, Program Changes 144,661 14,186 158,847 386,109 544,956

239,629 29,549 269,178 435,930 705,108

Total 4,989,887 501,302 5,491,189 1,791,174 7,282,363

18
IT Central Fund

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Capital Investment Fund 59,380 59,743 76,900 17,520

Expedited Passport Fees 184,550 156,000 163,181 -21,369

Total IT Central Fund 243,930 215,743 240,081 -3,849

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175). 

The Department of State’s FY 2014 request of $76.9 million for the IT Central Fund (ITCF) will support 

greater consolidation, improve efficiency, and support enhanced customer service; modernization of 

critical information technology systems and infrastructure; and maintain essential services that provide 

critical IT functions to both domestic and foreign consumers. Combined with Expedited Passport Fees 

collected by the Department, the ITCF will provide a total of $240.1 million for priority IT investments and 

modernization activities. 

In support of the Department’s vision to “create a more secure, democratic, and prosperous world for the 

benefit of the American people and the international community”, the ITCF focuses on the following 

strategic areas: 

Goal 1, Digital Diplomacy - enables enhanced collaboration and information sharing among 

internal and external stakeholders by applying modern tools of social networking and 

value-added information resources to the challenges of diplomacy and development. 

Goal 2, Cloud Computing – provides global access to all U.S. agencies operating overseas 

under the authority of the Chief of Mission via a robust, worldwide, web-based infrastructure. 

Goal 3, Department of State’s IT Leadership – ensures effective governance of all IT 

resources, domestic and overseas, and focusing on accountability to customers for excellence in 

performance and service delivery. 

The Department plans to execute the following FY 2014 priority investments in support of the IT Strategic 

Plan: 

• Continue to improve social media platforms to promote diplomatic initiatives that benefit both domestic 

and foreign communities. This includes creating and managing knowledge information system and 

resources through the development of enhanced collaboration and information sharing systems. The 

Department will also improve the integration of management systems through efficient use of centralized 

delivery platforms and infrastructure comprised of integrated tools and services to provide greater 

interagency communication and collaboration. 

• Continue development of the Department's private cloud computing service, providing a full range of 

infrastructure, software, and data services to internal and external customers. This includes leveraging 

continued investments in the Enterprise Server Operations Centers (ESOCs) data center consolidation 

initiative and the modernization of our global network infrastructure. 

19
• Continue development of the Foreign Affairs Network (FAN), extending cloud Infrastructure as a Service 

to other Federal agencies operating overseas. 

• Expand use of mobile technology, including a diversified catalog of secure end-user devices designed to 

meet targeted mobile business requirements. 

• Continue the modernization of the Department's major functional systems which operate as 

enterprise-wide centrally managed shared services (e.g. logistics, financial management, and human 

resource management), with data standardization, system interoperability, integrated management 

reporting and mobile delivery. 

• Continue investment in global training for IT specialists and end users, focusing on use of distance 

learning, online courses, and knowledge sharing.

20
IT Central Funds by Goal 

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Goal One: Digital Diplomacy 88,948 87,022 83,430 -5,518

Integrated Logistics Management System (ILMS) 20,000 20,030 20,000 -

Joint Financial Management System (JFMS) 10,316 10,316 5,119 -5,197

Integrated Personnel Management System (IPMS) 5,932 5,968 6,410 478

Global Foreign Affairs Compensation System 

(GFACS)

17,757 17,829 13,140 -4,617

Support for Legacy Compensation System 6,630 6,630 6,630 -

Enterprise Data Warehouse (EDW) 5,600 5,634 3,100 -2,500

Main State Messaging Center (MSMC) 11,354 11,366 9,500 -1,854

Department of State SharePoint Services 2,943 2,943 1,943 -1,000

Travel Manager Program 4,500 4,500 3,968 -532

Goal One Other 3,916 1,806 13,620 9,704

Goal Two: Cloud Computing 142,658 116,371 141,836 -822

Foreign Affairs Network (FAN) 9,840 6,840 2,250 -7,590

Enterprise Server Operations Center (ESOC) 11,304 11,373 27,908 16,604

Mobile Computing 3,400 3,400 3,400 -

Global IT Modernization (GITM) 76,450 58,390 62,487 -13,963

Enterprise Software - Licensing and Maintenance 26,905 26,905 27,904 999

Post Telephones 3,570 3,570 3,300 -270

Goal Two Other 11,189 5,893 14,587 3,398

Goal Three: IT Leadership 12,324 12,350 14,815 2,491

FSI Corporate Systems (STMS)

- - 2,000 2,000

FSI Instructional Support (SAIT) 4,526 4,526 4,000 -526

FSI Learning Infrastructure 3,500 3,500 3,000 -500

Goal Three Other 4,298 4,324 5,815 1,517

Total IT Central Fund 243,930 215,743 240,081 -3,849

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175). 

21
Border Security Program

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Border Security Program 2,498,821 2,498,821 2,771,691 272,870

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175). 

The FY 2014 request provides $2.7 billion for the Border Security Program (BSP). The BSP helps protect 

and assist American citizens abroad, and strengthens the security of the U.S. borders by preventing the 

entry of terrorists or others intending to engage in criminal activity in the United States. 

The BSP uses revenue from consular fees and surcharges to fund consular programs and activities. These 

fees include Machine Readable Visa fees; Western Hemisphere Travel Surcharges; a Passport Security 

Surcharge; Immigrant Visa Security Surcharge; Diversity Immigrant Visa Security Surcharge; and H-1B 

and L Fraud Prevention and Detection Fees. 

The FY 2014 request provides funding for costs associated with the provision of consular services, 

including overseas citizen services, consular facility costs, and investigative resources to support the Visa 

and Passport Security Strategy. The below summarizes the major activities of the Border Security 

Program. 

CONSULAR PROJECT INITIATIVES: $1,817 million 

Consular Systems Technology: $291.2 million 

Consular Systems Technology (CST) has five initiatives: Enterprise Operations, Consular Systems 

Support, Consular Systems Development and Enhancements, Enterprise Engineering & Data Management 

and Enterprise Management Services. These activities support the legacy Consular Affairs (CA) systems, 

as well as the development and rollout of new tools to support CA’s core lines of business. Infrastructure, 

systems development, enhancements, training, hardware, and operations and maintenance are all included 

in this line item. The Department will also continue to implement Consular One, a coordinated 

overarching framework that will permit the consolidation of all consular applications into one framework 

architecture to greatly increase data sharing and processing efficiencies, and to significantly reduce data 

entering redundancies, processing time and data entry errors. 

Domestic Executive Support Costs: $23.7 million

Domestic Executive Support provides operational support for consular and BSP activities worldwide. 

This activity consolidates four existing offices in CA Headquarters as a result of consular realignment. 

Funding supports operational costs for CA’s Front Office, Office of Policy Coordination, Office of the 

Comptroller, and the Executive Office. Funding also provides domestic program support, outreach, travel 

and contractual support. 

Document Integrity, Training and Anti-Fraud Programs: $18.3 million 

This initiative supports enhanced U.S. border protection and security through strengthening the integrity of 

U.S. visas and passports in addition to fraud prevention as it relates to Overseas Citizen Services issues. 

Funding will continue to support passport and visa fraud prevention as well as expanded H-1B and L visa 

fraud detection efforts. 

 

22
Visa Processing: $61 million

The Visa Office is the Department’s central authority on the visa function and handles all aspects of the visa 

issuance process. The FY 2014 requested funding will support on-going operations at the National Visa 

Center (NVC), the KCC and Visa Office headquarters operations in Washington, DC. 

Public Information Support: $38.1 million 

This activity supports two contractor-operated call centers (the National Passport Information Center and 

the Overseas Citizen Services Call Center), internet websites and Web 2.0 tools used primarily for social 

media and traditional on-site outreach to provide the public with the most responsive information available 

in the most cost-effective manner. 

Passport Operations: $228.3 million 

Passport Services provides accurate and secure U.S. Passport documents, responds effectively to the needs 

of U.S. passport customers, and strengthens management and delivery capabilities. In order to service the 

American public in a timely manner, Passport Services must continue to modernize its systems, maintain 

accountability of its partners, and ensure standardization of processes and procedures across all agencies to 

the greatest extent possible. The Bureau of Consular Affairs is developing a new travel document called 

“The Next Generation Passport” as part of the ongoing efforts to maintain and improve secure travel 

documents. 

In FY 2012, CA adjudicated 13.1 million travel documents (including 1.3 million passport cards). The 

Department estimates passport workload to be 15.1 million in both FY 2013 and FY 2014. This request 

will allow Passport Services to meet projected demand, improve techniques for verifying passport applicant 

data, streamline processing of courier submitted applications, centralize scanning of passport records; and 

make passport facilities more efficient and secure. Passport Services will continue to expand access to and 

incorporate supplementary automated identity verification databases used during the adjudication process. 

Passport Facilities: $35 million

Presenting up-to-date, comfortable, and safe spaces for the public at agencies is one of many facets in 

providing a positive customer experience. Improving communication with customers through the use of 

agency signage and addressing the needs of hearing-impaired customers is also a priority. Funds will 

cover one-time costs for the opening of the new Passport facility in Puerto Rico and support the two Book 

Personalization Facilities in Arkansas and Arizona. Items funded in this request include maintenance 

services, renovations, telephone systems, utilities, and furniture and office equipment. 

American Citizen Services (ACS): $8.6 million

The Department protects the safety and welfare of American citizens abroad through its ACS program. 

The FY 2014 request will allow ACS to meet its protection responsibilities for American citizens overseas 

through programs for crisis management, protection of children, victims of crime, and U.S. citizens 

residing and traveling abroad, voter assistance programs, and emergency support to destitute American 

citizens. 

Consular Affairs Domestic Support: $350.1 million 

This activity covers domestic support costs such as blank passport books, passport cards, postage and other 

supplies (e.g. foils, ribbons, and sleeves) that are used to produce U.S. travel documents. These costs 

continue to increase proportionally with demand and also as a result of enhanced document security 

features. The Department estimates passport workload for FY 2013 and 2014 to be 15.1 million (13.3 

million passport books, and 1.8 million passport cards). This activity also includes CA’s fee-funded 

program base reimbursement to activities initially funded through the Diplomatic and Consular Programs 

appropriation. 

23
Consular Affairs Overseas Support: $761.7 million

This line item includes start-up and recurring costs for overseas staff, such as program support costs for visa 

consumables and supplies (visa foils and card stock); the Global Support Services (GSS); International 

Cooperative Administrative Support Services (ICASS); Foreign Service National Separation Liability 

Trust Fund (FSNSLTF); CA Post Allotments (collection of MRV bank fees from applicants); equipment 

for consular agents; support for Consular Management Assessment Team (CMAT); and LE Staff and U.S. 

Direct Hire non-salary support. 

The $214.1 million increase over the 2012 Actual level includes consular activities that were transferred to 

BSP as part of the Consular Realignment Initiative. These costs, including consumables and supplies for 

visa and passport programs, and ICASS costs, were formerly included in the request for Overseas Support 

under Border Security Support/DOS Partners. The increase also includes salary and benefits for locally 

engaged consular employees, as well as post-specific benefits of American consular staff, which were 

transferred from the Regional Bureaus as part of Consular Realignment. 

A $74 million increase is also requested for continued GSS implementation. GSS is a worldwide initiative 

changing the way third parties provide information, schedule appointments, collect fees, deliver 

documents, and provide greet visa support services. The replacement of the existing user-pays services 

will provide better accountability, transparency, and customer service in the support activities supplied by 

commercial entities to consular sections around the world. GSS implementation will cost an estimated 

$243.5 million in FY 2014. By the end of FY 2014, 117 countries will have GSS coverage. 

BORDER SECURITY STAFF/AMERICAN SALARIES (AMSALS): $481.7 million 

Border Security staff costs include domestic and overseas positions in the Bureau of Consular Affairs and 

Diplomatic Security. Salary funding also included for select positions in the Office of the Secretary 

Operations Center, Bureau of Administration, Bureau for Counterterrorism, Office of the Legal Advisor, 

Foreign Service Institute, and Information Resource Management. The request also reflects funding for 

Limited Non-career Appointment (LNA) positions to address growing visa demand. In FY 2014, the 

Department plans to increase staff by 110 overseas consular positions—of which 93 are LNA 

positions—and 41 domestic positions, in order to support consular workload. 

BORDER SECURITY SUPPORT/DEPARTMENT OF STATE PARTNERS: $335.5 million 

Bureau of Administration (A): $61.5 million

A’s Office of Facilities Management Services (FMS), will assume building management oversight of CA’s 

World Headquarters Building (SA-17A) and facilities in Portsmouth, New Hampshire, ensuring a safe and 

secure environment for all CA domestic staff. In addition to these activities, FMS will provide technical 

expertise and assistance for incoming mail threat detection, ergonomic assessments of office environments, 

indoor air quality assessments, and other environmental health and safety programs at CA facilities 

throughout the United States. 

Diplomatic Security (DS): $58.9 million 

DS hires and assigns uniformed protection officers to guard all domestic CA facilities. This request 

contains funding for 18 additional guards at SA-17A as well as seven guards at the new Puerto Rico 

Passport facility. 

Foreign Service Institute (FSI): $6 million 

FSI provides training in domestic and overseas classes, conferences, on-line courses, and workshops. The 

training targets consular officers, consular agents, LE staff, as well as systems staff who support CA’s 

strategic goals and priorities, and Civil Service employees in CA and its passport agencies. 

24
Information Resource Management (IRM): $31 million 

The Bureau of Information Resource Management (IRM) will provide the technology backbone support to 

BSP and will continue to handle CLASS technology enhancement requirements that support CA’s 

adjudication of passport and visa applications. The request also covers information technology support 

needed to address the Executive Order on “Establishing Visa and Foreign Visitor Processing Goals and the 

Task Force on Travel and Competitiveness.”

Overseas Building Operations (OBO): $161.8 million 

The funding request for FY 2014 will support a significant increase in BSP’s contribution to OBO project 

costs, as CA assumes all residential lease costs associated with consular officers overseas (approximately 

$91.8 million), in addition to the costs of an estimated additional two new consular posts at $25 million 

each, and other facilities improvements worldwide (estimated at $20 million). The Department will 

continue planned facility improvements throughout China and Brazil in FY 2014 to meet visa demand. 

American Institute in Taiwan (AIT): $6 million 

Beginning in FY 2014, the Border Security Program will include funding to support consular-related 

operations in the AIT. The BSP will provide $6 million to normalize AIT’s consular operations to match 

worldwide process and systems, and ensure AIT funding security in the future given Taiwan’s acceptance 

into the Visa Waiver Program. 

Repatriation Loans: $737,000 

Beginning in FY 2014, BSP will include funding for the Repatriation Loans program to allow the 

Department to administer the program from approval to final payoff at a level consistent with expected loan 

volume. 

Overseas Staff Support: $9.2 million

This line item previously covered programmatic expenses of the BSP, including consumables and supplies 

for visa and passport programs, ICASS costs, and salaries and post-specific benefits previously covered by 

the Regional Bureaus. As part of the Consular Realignment Initiative, these costs are now included in the 

Consular Affairs Overseas Support line item described under Consular Project Initiatives. The Overseas 

Staff Support line item now reflects Post Assignment Travel for overseas consular personnel, including 

training, travel, and change of station costs, which are crucial to staffing overseas missions with trained 

personnel. 

FBI FINGERPRINT CHECKS REIMBURSEMENT: $138.6 million 

The FY 2014 Request includes funding for the Department to reimburse the FBI for Advanced Fingerprint 

Identification Technology clearances of fingerprints. 

25
Resource Detail – BSP Fees

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Machine Readable Visa (MRV) Fee 1,802,147 1,802,147 1,852,316 50,169

Western Hemisphere Travel Surcharge 215,500 215,500 186,150 -29,350

Enhanced Border Security Program Fees 430,700 430,700 686,064 255,364

 Passport Security Surcharge 377,000 377,000 628,500 251,500

 Immigrant Visa Security Surcharge 36,000 36,000 39,564 3,564

 Diversity Fee 17,700 17,700 18,000 300

Fraud Prevention Fee 50,474 50,474 47,161 -3,313

Total Border Security Program Expenses 2,498,821 2,498,821 2,771,691 272,870

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175). 

26
Working Capital Fund

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Working Capital Fund 1,169,078 1,292,977 1,316,250 147,172

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175). 

The Working Capital Fund (WCF) does not receive direct appropriations. Revenues are generated in the 

WCF from the sale of goods and services to the Department and other federal agencies. The revenue 

collected from these customers is used to pay for the acquisition of resources needed to ensure the 

continuous operation of the various WCF activities. Further, in exchange for goods and services, resources 

from the initial/additional investment are expended and subsequently are reimbursed from funded customer 

orders. The economies of scale achieved through WCF activities are a significant advantage in controlling 

costs, avoiding duplication, and achieving service standards. 

The WCF FY 2014 projections remain relatively flat with the exception of an inflation adjustment of 1.8 

percent based on the current services adjustment. The overall increase from the FY 2012 to FY 2013 is 

primarily due to the inclusion of Afghanistan into the Aviation Working Capital Fund (AWCF). Since its 

inception, the AWCF has provided a formalized, equitable, efficient, and effective means of financing, 

budgeting, and accounting for its aviation transportation assets in Iraq and Afghanistan. The AWCF 

provides all costs associated with the operation and maintenance of aviation assets in Iraq and Afghanistan 

is funded through a single mechanism. It also allows users to access air transportation to support their 

programs and operates on the economic principle that users bear the cost of these services; this eliminates 

any possible waste or overuse of services, where users would otherwise not be charged. The AWCF will 

help develop more accurate aircraft requirements for Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and other areas as needed. 

27
Embassy Security, Construction and Maintenance

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Embassy Security, Construction and Maintenance 1,652,700 1,579,406 2,649,351 996,651

Enduring2/

1,537,000 1,546,406 2,399,351 862,351

Ongoing Operations 762,000 766,663 785,351 23,351

Worldwide Security Upgrades 775,000 779,743 1,614,000 839,000

Overseas Contingency Operations3/

115,700 33,000 250,000 134,300

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175). 

2/ FY 2012 Actual includes the transfer of $82.7 million from Diplomatic and Consular Programs for diplomatic facilities in Baghdad. 

3/ Summary for OCO ongoing operations is located in a separate chapter in the OCO section. 

The Bureau of Overseas Buildings Operations (OBO), funded through the Embassy Security, Construction, 

and Maintenance (ESCM) appropriation, is responsible for providing U.S. Diplomatic and Consular 

missions overseas with secure, safe, and functional facilities to assist them in achieving the foreign policy 

objectives of the United States. 

The work supported by this request is vital, as more than 86,000 U.S. Government employees from more 

than 30 agencies at over 280 locations depend on the infrastructure OBO provides and maintains. OBO is 

focused on several priorities to ensure that the President, the Secretary, and other U.S. government agencies 

have the tools and platform to be effective in their mission. Following the September 2012 attacks on 

several of our embassies and the subsequent recommendations of the Accountability Review Board (ARB), 

the Department has undertaken a worldwide review of our overall security posture to identify and 

implement additional measures to bolster the security of our facilities and personnel where necessary. 

When combined with other agency contributions and OCO funding, the FY 2014 Request provides $2.2 

billion for the construction of new secure facilities, consistent with the recommendations of the ARB. 

OBO is focused on four priority goals that advance diplomatic readiness and are aligned with the 

Department’s strategic goals. These goals are:

Capital Security Construction – Award capital security construction projects which have been listed 

in the Department’s Long-Range Plan (LRP) after consultation with other agencies, and complete the 

construction on-time and within budget. The program will provide new facilities that are secure, safe, 

and functional for U.S. Government employees to pursue the national interests of the United States. 

Compound and Physical Security – Provide physical security and compound security upgrades to 

Department overseas facilities to protect employees from terrorist and other security threats. This also 

includes security upgrades for soft targets such as schools, recreational facilities, and residences. 

28
Maintenance of Assets – Maintain, repair, and rehabilitate overseas diplomatic and consular facilities 

in an effective manner that enhances the quality of life of employees while allowing them to perform 

their duties in secure, safe, and functional facilities. 

Asset Management – Acquire, dispose of, and manage the Department’s overseas real property in a 

professional manner that meets Department needs and is performed on terms favorable to the 

U.S. Government.

The FY 2014 Request is $2.4 billion and 1,020 positions, an increase of $862.4 million and six positions 

over the FY 2012 Actual level. This includes $1.6 billion to continue the Worldwide Security Upgrade 

Program, including the continuation of the Capital Security and Maintenance Cost Sharing Programs; 

$106.3 million for the Repair and Construction Program; and $679.1 million to support operating elements. 

The ESCM request provides $1.6 billion for Worldwide Security Upgrades (WSU). Of the total, $1.4 

billion in funding will extend the multi-year Capital Security Construction program to replace facilities in 

the most vulnerable locations. When combined with Capital Security Cost Sharing (CSCS) contributions 

from other agencies and other reimbursements, the request will provide a total of $1.95 billion for up to six 

new construction projects; as well as Marine Security Guard Quarters and site acquisitions for future plans. 

WSU funding of $101 million will also continue to upgrade security for compounds at high risk and soft 

targets, such as schools and recreation facilities. 

The Maintenance Cost Sharing (MCS) program will address facility needs at posts that will not receive a 

NEC in the near future. The $130 million provided under the MCS initiative is to extend the useful life of 

existing infrastructure and protect the U.S. long-term investment in new facilities. This request will be 

combined with $37 million from other agencies, for a total of $167 million. 

The ESCM request further provides $785 million for Ongoing Operations. The funding will support real 

property management, including administration of leaseholds, and other vital ongoing activities. These 

activities include repair and construction, program development and support, construction and security 

management, and maintenance and renovation of the Department’s facilities at locations in the 

United States. 

29
Conflict Stabilization Operations

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Conflict Stabilization Operations2/ 30,316 8,500 45,207 14,891

Enduring 21,816 - 45,207 23,391

Overseas Contingency Operations 8,500 8,500 - -8,500

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175). 

2/ FY 2012 Actual includes $21.8 million transferred from Diplomatic and Consular Programs. Although not included in the table above, FY 2012 

Actual level is being sustained under the FY 2013 Continuing Resolution through a transfer from D&CP.

The FY 2014 request for the Bureau of Conflict and Stabilization Operations is $45.2 million, a total 

increase of $14.9 million above the FY 2012 actual. In FY 2014, funding will be used primarily for 

high-impact engagements based on CSO’s criteria for engagement. These will depend on conditions at the 

time, but may include Middle East and North Africa transition countries, Nigeria, Burma, and/or North 

Central America. CSO anticipates undertaking a small number of large-scale, high-impact engagements 

and between 10-15 medium-sized, technically-focused engagements. As resources permit, CSO will also 

deploy experts to assist embassies or other partners with policy or program development challenges. The 

Department also requests authority to transfer up to $7 million from the Complex Crisis Fund to support 

overseas conflict and stabilization projects. The FY 2014 programs will focus on: (1) responding rapidly 

to break cycles of violent conflict and mitigate crises in priority countries; (2) catalyzing local reform by 

promoting policies, regulations, and practices that increase community resilience and address causes of 

destabilizing violence; (3) mobilizing local stakeholders and reformers to build coalitions to prevent 

conflict and respond to crisis; and managing resources responsibly to prevent conflict and respond to crisis. 

CSO was established as a Bureau in November 2011 in response to the Quadrennial Diplomacy and 

Development Review’s (QDDR) call to elevate conflict prevention as a core mission of the State 

Department and to respond much earlier in conflict situations, rather than reacting after violence has broken 

out. Former Secretary Clinton characterized the creation of CSO as “one of the most important decisions 

that came out of the QDDR” because of the critical role of civilian engagement in conflict-affected settings 

in protecting Americans, promoting the U.S. values, and furthering U.S. national interests. 

The Bureau’s work, through the interagency Civilian Response Corps (CRC), provides expertise with a 

focus on conflict prevention and response. Investment in such efforts may result in averting much costlier 

military or humanitarian interventions down the road. CSO’s past work has included helping to facilitate 

South Sudan’s referendum on independence, supporting efforts to stamp out the Lord’s Resistance Army, 

and allaying ethnic violence in the Kyrgyz Republic. Through the CRC, the Bureau has also provided a 

broad array of support on election-related conflict prevention in Kenya, encouraged democratic openings 

and reconciliation in Burma, offered non-lethal support to the opposition in Syria, and designed innovative 

approaches to reducing crime-related violence in Central America. 

It is critical that solutions are driven by local dynamics and actors, both to work and to ensure long-term 

sustainability. CSO’s approach to conflict situations prioritizes host nation capacity building and local 

solutions to problems. The methodology to prepare for a deployment includes a rigorous process of joint 

analysis and planning in partnership with the host nation and other partners, complemented by proactive 

monitoring, evaluation, and learning processes that further enhance policy and operational engagement. 

30
Resource Detail – CSO Activities

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Partnership and Learning 4,005 - 7,300 3,295

Policy and Programs 3,103 - 7,414 4,311

CSO Headquarters 2,388 - 3,700 1,312

Overseas Response Operations 12,320 - 26,793 14,473

Total, Enduring2/

21,816 - 45,207 23,391

Overseas Contingency Operations 8,500 8,500 - -8,500

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175). 

2/ FY 2012 actual includes the transfer of $21.8 million from the Diplomatic and Consular Programs account to Conflict Stabilization Operations. 

31
Office of Inspector General

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Office of Inspector General 129,086 129,465 119,056 -10,030

Enduring 61,904 62,283 69,406 7,502

Overseas Contingency Operations2/ 67,182 67,182 49,650 -17,532

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175). 

2/ In FY 2012, FY 2013, and FY 2014, funding for the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) and Special Inspector 

General for Iraq Reconstruction (SIGIR) are included in the Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) chapter. 

The Office of Inspector General's (OIG) mandate encompasses all domestic and overseas activities, 

programs, and missions of the Department of State and the Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG). OIG’s 

overarching goal for 2014 is to effect positive change by being a valued resource to the Department and 

BBG in promoting U.S. interests and sustained leadership, with specific emphasis on the following: 

 

Relevance: OIG work will be directed at Department and BBG priorities, including those identified in 

the Quadrennial Diplomacy and Development Review (QDDR). OIG's work will emphasize critical, 

resource-intensive programs and operations in the frontline states; global issues; the effectiveness of 

foreign assistance programs; regional management activities and the use of new technologies and 

innovative approaches; priority posts and bureaus; and the Department’s coordination with other 

U.S. Government agencies. 

Value Added: OIG will recommend actions that correct identified vulnerabilities and result in savings, 

cost recoveries, funds put to better use, restitutions and fines, prevention of losses, and improved 

efficiencies and security. 

Usefulness: OIG products will assist decision makers in improving programs and making the most 

effective spending decisions in an environment of increasingly constrained financial resources. 

Timeliness: OIG will continually strive to reduce the time for completing its audits, inspections, and 

reviews by using appropriate technologies to start jobs sooner, finish them quicker, and disseminate the 

results broadly and rapidly. 

The FY 2014 enduring request for the OIG provides a total of $69.4 million to support the activities of the 

Department of State Inspector General. These activities include audits, investigations, and inspections of 

worldwide operations and programs of the Department and the Broadcasting Board of Governors. Such 

activities assist in improving the economy, efficiency, and effectiveness of operations, as well as in 

detecting and preventing fraud, waste, and mismanagement. The appropriation will also provide support for 

the OIG’s Middle East Regional Office (MERO) and the Department’s full contribution to the Council of 

the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency. The funding request also includes funding to fill 15 

authorized, but currently vacant, direct-hire positions, including 5 overseas positions located in Baghdad, 

Iraq. The overseas positions in Iraq include three MERO auditor positions and two Middle East 

Investigations Branch (MEIB) investigators, which are funded in this request at $3.8 million. These 

positions will allow OIG to accomplish the increased workload in Iraq resulting from SIGIR's anticipated 

closure in FY 2013

32
Educational and Cultural Exchange Programs

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Educational and Cultural Exchange Programs 598,800 602,369 562,659 -36,141

Enduring 583,200 586,769 562,659 -20,541

Overseas Contingency Operations 15,600 15,600 - -15,600

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175). 

The Administration has directed the Department of State to embrace a new era of engagement, based on 

mutual understanding and mutual respect. The Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) answers 

that call with its mission to advance U.S. interests and universal values through public diplomacy and 

programs that connect the United States and Americans to the world. ECA programs support the 

Department’s foreign policy priorities by leveraging American education, society and culture as 21st

Century diplomatic tools in responding directly to the United States National Security Strategy’s call for “a 

sustained effort to engage civil society and citizens and facilitate increased connections among the 

American people and peoples around the world.” 

ECA’s mandate embodies the concept of “smart power” by using all available tools beyond traditional 

diplomacy to achieve the Department’s 21st Century foreign policy goals, to advance U.S. interests at home 

and abroad by giving foreign participants a positive view of America and Americans and by giving 

U.S. citizens an international perspective and a competitive edge in a global market. ECA strengthens 

U.S. foreign policy initiatives in new strategic directions through engagement with younger and 

traditionally underserved populations. ECA’s newer programming also specifically targets women and 

girls. In all of these efforts, the expanding power of social media and technology has become increasingly 

indispensible. 

The enduring FY 2014 request is $562.7 million, a decrease of $36.1 million from the FY 2012 actual level. 

Within this level of funding, ECA will continue to foster mutual understanding through people-to-people 

exchanges that communicate U.S. values and develop future leaders with a global perspective. This 

funding is needed to meet urgent foreign policy priorities, and will be invaluable to public diplomacy 

practitioners in the field to aid them in reaching priority audiences of women, youth, underserved groups 

and current and emerging leaders. 

American English programs will remain a critical element to ECA’s strategic planning in FY 2014. 

Teaching English, particularly to underserved and marginalized populations is one of the Department’s 

most effective public diplomacy tools. 

In FY 2014, ECA will continue to leverage the strengths and benefits of educational, cultural and 

professional exchanges to support the foreign policy challenges facing the United States today. 

33
Resource Detail – ECE Activities

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease 

From 

FY2012

Academic Programs 324,582 326,569 309,837 -14,745

Fulbright Program 230,430 231,840 232,500 2,070

Students, Scholars, Teachers, Humphrey, 

Undergraduates 230,430 231,840 232,500 2,070

Global Academic Exchanges 55,482 55,822 55,872 390

Educational Advising and Student Services 12,210 12,285 12,185 -25

English Language Programs 43,272 43,537 43,687 415

Special Academic Exchanges 38,670 38,907 21,465 -17,205

Regional Graduate Fellowships 18,570 18,684 - -18,570

American Overseas Research Centers 4,000 4,024 4,000 -

South Pacific Exchanges 470 473 350 -120

Timor Leste Exchanges 470 473 350 -120

Mobility (Disability) Exchange Clearinghouse 470 473 450 -20

Benjamin A. Gilman International Scholarship 

Program 13,040 13,120 10,815 -2,225

George Mitchell Fellowship Program 470 473 - -470

University of Miami Hemispheric Program 470 473 - -470

Tibet Fund 710 714 500 -210

Global University Innovation 0 0 5,000 5,000

Professional and Cultural Exchanges 193,964 195,150 187,912 -6,052

International Visitor Leadership Program 90,650 91,205 89,242 -1,408

International Visitor Leadership Program 90,650 91,205 89,242 -1,408

Citizen Exchange Program 99,425 100,033 98,112 -1,313

Professional/Cultural/Youth 99,425 100,033 98,112 -1,313

Special Professional and Cultural Exchanges 3,889 3,912 558 -3,331

Mike Mansfield Fellowship Program 1,518 1,527 - -1,518

Institute for Representative Government 422 425 - -422

Irish Institute 867 872 - -867

Youth Science Leadership Institute of the 

Americas 150 151 - -150

Ngwang Choephel Fellows (Tibet) 558 561 558 -

Pakistan Literacy Training 374 376 - -374

34
($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease 

From 

FY2012

Program and Performance 5,054 5,085 4,751 -303

Evaluation 1,854 1,865 1,751 -103

Alumni 3,200 3,220 3,000 -200

Exchanges Support 59,600 59,965 60,159 559

Total 583,200 586,769 562,659 -20,541

35
Representation Allowances

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Representation Allowances2/ 8,030 7,345 7,679 -351

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175). 

2/The FY 2012 actual includes a transfer of $730,000 from the D&CP account. 

Representational functions convey U.S. foreign policy goals and objectives in both bilateral and 

multilateral fora. The Department is concentrating on representational activities that support 

U.S. positions on multilateral trade and economic development issues pending before the European Union 

(EU), the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation 

(APEC), Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA), Free Trade of the Americas (FTAA), African 

Growth and Opportunity Acts (AGOA) and the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). 

Representational functions include protocol events such as national holidays, installation or inauguration of 

national leaders, or visits of noted personages. Representation funds may also be used to establish or 

consolidate professional relationships with local government counterparts necessary to the performance of 

official duties. For the Foreign Service, the ability to engage partners in an informal setting is an 

invaluable opportunity to strengthen the U.S. position where interlocutors are not yet ready to be 

forthcoming in a more formal setting. 

The FY 2014 Request is $7.7 million, a $351,000 decrease from FY 2012 actual, which included a transfer 

of $730,000 from the D&CP account. Representation activities directly contribute to engagement with 

foreign counterparts, thus enabling the environment for diplomacy, advancing U.S. led development 

efforts, and aligning with Presidential Policy Directives on global development and with the Quadrennial 

Diplomacy and Development Review (QDDR). 

36
Protection of Foreign Missions and Officials

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Protection of Foreign Missions and Officials2/ 27,750 27,165 28,200 450

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175). 

2/The FY 2012 actual includes a transfer of $750,000 from the WSP account. 

The FY 2014 request for Protection of Foreign Missions and Officials (PFMO) is $28.2 million, which is 

$450,000 above the FY 2012 actual. This increase will provide additional funding for reimbursable 

expenses to New York City and the surrounding areas. 

In FY 2014, the Department is proposing authority to transfer expired unobligated balances, up to $50 

million each fiscal year, from the Diplomatic and Consular Programs account to the PFMO account. The 

transfer authority would provide additional resources for the reimbursement of state and local governments 

for eligible costs associated with the protection of foreign missions and officials. 

37
Emergencies in the Diplomatic and Consular Service

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Emergencies in the Diplomatic and Consular 

Service

9,073 9,357 9,652 579

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175). 

The Department’s FY 2014 request of $9.7 million for Emergencies in the Diplomatic and Consular 

Service (EDCS) is a $579,000 increase above the FY 2012 actual. 

Demands on EDCS, although unpredictable, are heavily influenced by evacuations that may occur as a 

result of natural disasters, epidemics, terrorist acts, and civil unrest. Recent demands include the 

earthquakes in Japan and Haiti, and the Arab Spring conflicts which resulted in several large-scale 

evacuations. In FY 2012, evacuations occurred in Damascus, Syria, Bamako, Mali, Tripoli, Libya, Lahore 

and Karachi, Pakistan, Tunis, Tunisia, and Khartoum, Sudan. In FY 2013, evacuations have occurred in 

Algiers, Algeria, Bangui, Central African Republic, and Bamako, Mali. An estimated $3 million of the 

Department’s request will support emergency evacuations. 

The EDCS appropriation also funds certain activities relating to the conduct of foreign affairs by senior 

Administration officials. These activities generally take place in connection with the U.S. hosting of 

U.S. Government-sponsored conferences, such as the UN and OAS General Assembly, the G-20 Summit, 

the Nuclear Security Summit, the U.S.-China Strategic and Economic Dialogue, the Asian-Pacific 

Economic (APEC) Summit, and the NATO Summit. In FY 2012, the Department’s EDCS costs for the 

APEC Summit were over $2 million. Other activities funded from EDCS are travel of Presidential 

delegations, official visits, and official gifts for foreign dignitaries, Presidential, Vice Presidential, and 

Congressional travel overseas, and representation requirements of senior Department officials. The 

Department’s request includes $5.7 million for these activities in FY 2014. 

38
Buying Power Maintenance Account

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Buying Power Maintenance Account2/

- - - -

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175). 

2/FY 2012 Actual includes $30.9 million transferred to Diplomatic and Consular Programs. FY 2013 CR includes a transfer of $27.5 million to 

Diplomatic and Consular Programs. 

The Buying Power Maintenance Account (BPMA) provides funding to offset adverse fluctuations in 

foreign currency exchange rates that would erode the State Department’s buying power overseas. The 

FY 2014 budget does not include a funding request for this account, as the Department will use existing 

BPMA balances and transfer authorities to manage exchange rate fluctuations that may occur in FY 2014. 

39
Repatriation Loans Program Account

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Repatriation Loans Program Account 1,674 1,456 1,700 26

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175). 

The FY 2014 Repatriation Loans Program Account request is $1.7 million, which is $26,000 above the 

FY 2012 actual. These funds will allow the Department of State to subsidize and administer the 

Repatriation loans program consistent with the Credit Reform Act of 1990. 

40
Payment to the American Institute in Taiwan

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Payment to the American Institute in Taiwan2/ 21,778 21,237 36,221 14,443

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175). 

2/FY 2012 Actual includes a transfer in of $670,000 from Diplomatic and Consular Programs. 

The Department’s FY 2014 request of $36.2 million for the American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) includes 

adjustments to maintain current services and continue support for several key initiatives as a result of 

reduced visa revenue due to Taiwan’s entry into the Visa Waiver Program (VWP). Additionally, this 

request includes funding for the upgrade/installation of AIT’s financial management system. 

41
Foreign Service Retirement and Disability Fund

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Foreign Service Retirement and Disability Fund2/ 158,900 158,900 158,900 -

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175). 

2/ FY 2012 Actual, FY 2013 CR and FY 2013 Request includes mandatory funding for both the Department of State and USAID. 

This appropriation provides mandatory funding for the Foreign Service Retirement and Disability Fund 

(FSRDF). The FSRDF includes the operations of two separate retirement systems - the Foreign Service 

Retirement and Disability System (FSRDS) and the Foreign Service Pension System (FSPS). The FSRDF 

was established to provide pensions to all eligible retired and disabled members of the Foreign Service who 

are enrolled in either of the two systems, and certain eligible former spouses and survivors. The purpose of 

this appropriation is to maintain the required funding level of the FSRDF. 

This request serves as one of the resources to finance any unfunded liability created by new or liberalized 

benefits, new groups of beneficiaries, and salary increases paid from the Fund, and for normal costs not met 

by employee and employer contributions. The amount of the appropriation is determined by the annual 

evaluation of the Fund balance derived from current statistical data, which includes Federal pay raise 

information. 

The FY 2014 request for the FSRDF is $158.9 million. This amount includes estimated Foreign Service 

costs for the Department of $122.5 million and for the United States Agency for International Development 

of $36.4 million. 

42
International Chancery Center

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

International Chancery Center2/ 520 523 5,970 5,450

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175). 

2/ Reflects scoring of fee collections from the International Chancery Center Trust Fund, as included in the FY 2014 President’s Budget Appendix. 

Proposed appropriations language for this project is based on the Diplomatic and Consular Programs fees and payments provisions of Division I, 

Title I of Public Law 112-74. 

The International Chancery Center (ICC), authorized by the International Center Act in 1968, is a 

diplomatic enclave located on a 47 acre lot in northwest DC, near the intersection of Connecticut Avenue 

and Van Ness Street. According to the Act, “The Secretary of State is authorized to sell or lease to foreign 

governments...property owned by the United States, in order to facilitate the conduct of foreign relations 

by the Department of State...through the creation of a more propitious atmosphere for the establishment of 

foreign government and international organization offices and other facilities.” Under these authorities, 

the Department has benefited through the transfer of development rights for specific parcels of the ICC to 

19 foreign governments through leasing and reciprocal property swaps. Proceeds from these leases have 

been deposited in a trust that is drawn upon, with the concurrence of the Congress, in order to perform basic 

maintenance and repairs at the site. 

Now that the ICC property is fully occupied, the Department is seeking to create a similar site at the former 

Walter Reed Army Medical Center. This location will allow roughly 20 -25 countries to build embassy 

compounds in Washington, DC that are larger, more secure and more functional than their existing 

structures. This will also help the United States establish more functional and secure compounds in those 

countries, because of reciprocity. The FY 2014 request will fund initial maintenance and security at this 

planned new site, as well as several overdue repairs at the existing ICC site, including sidewalks, streets, 

driveways, and staircases. 

43
Contributions to International Organizations

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Contributions to International Organizations2/ 1,551,000 1,559,872 1,573,454 22,454

Enduring 1,449,700 1,458,572 1,573,454 123,754

Overseas Contingency Operations 101,300 101,300 - -101,300

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175). 

2/ The Administration seeks Congressional support for legislation that would provide authority to waive legislative restrictions that, if triggered, 

would prohibit paying U.S. contributions to United Nations specialized agencies that grant the Palestinians the same standing as member states or 

full membership as a state. Should the Congress pass this waiver legislation, the FY 2014 funding specifically requested for UNESCO would 

cover the FY 2014 UNESCO assessment and the FY 2013 and FY 2014 Contingent Requirements funding would cover arrears which accrued in 

FY 2012 and FY 2013. 

The FY 2014 request of $1.57 billion for Contributions to International Organizations (CIO) provides 

funding to pay the U.S. share of the assessed budgets of 45 international organizations. U.S. participation 

in nearly all of these organizations is the result of U.S. ratification of a treaty or convention that creates a 

financial obligation to pay an assessed contribution. 

The Administration's commitment to strengthening and working through international organizations is laid 

out in the National Security Strategy as a vital component of diplomacy and foreign policy. By combining 

resources and expertise, international organizations undertake coordinated efforts that are an effective 

alternative to acting unilaterally or bilaterally, especially in the areas of providing humanitarian assistance, 

eradicating disease, setting food and transportation safety standards, and reaching agreement to impose 

sanctions on rogue states and actors. International organizations facilitate collective action by the world 

community to combat violent extremism; limit the spread of nuclear and chemical weapons; achieve 

balanced and sustainable economic growth; and forge solutions to the threats of armed conflict, hunger, 

poverty, and climate change. 

The Administration is committed to robust multilateral engagement and to promoting U.S. leadership in 

international organizations as a means of advancing U.S. national security interests and values. For this 

reason, the Administration seeks Congressional support for legislation that would provide authority to 

waive legislative restrictions that, if triggered, would prohibit paying U.S. contributions to United Nations 

specialized agencies that grant the Palestinians the same standing as member states or full membership as a 

state. The ability to make such contributions is essential to advancing U.S. interests worldwide and 

strengthening U.S. global leadership, influence, and credibility. While the Administration remains 

committed to heading off any new efforts by the Palestinians to seek such membership in organizations 

across the UN system, these moves may well continue, and the law as currently written runs counter to 

U.S. national security interests by allowing the Palestinians to isolate the United States and prevent the 

active U.S. engagement necessary to pursue U.S. policy objectives in international organizations. In turn, 

the United States would lose influence and eventually voting rights in international organizations. 

International organizations offer significant benefits to U.S. taxpayers. Nearly every Federal agency relies 

on international organizations to help advance foreign and domestic objectives. Countless U.S. businesses 

and citizens depend on international organizations to reduce barriers to trade, improve border and port 

security, obtain international patent and trademark protection, set standards for aviation and maritime 

security, maintain the world's telecommunications networks, harmonize international law in the areas of 

44
child custody, support, and international adoption, and disseminate information about the supply and 

demand of vital commodities such as cotton and coffee. The Congressional Budget Justification for the 

CIO account identifies hundreds of accomplishments by international organizations in these areas. 

Resource Detail – CIO Activities 

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

United Nations and Affiliated Agencies

United Nations Regular Budget (UN) 568,863 567,946 617,661 48,798

United Nations Capital Master Plan (UN CMP) 75,535 - - -75,535

UN War Crimes Tribunal - Rwanda (UNICTR) 13,215 9,731 9,804 -3,411

UN War Crimes Tribunal - Yugoslavia (ICTY) 18,355 16,048 15,680 -2,675

Int'l Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals 

(IRM)

2,737 3,002 5,652 2,915

Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) 110,445 113,769 114,089 3,644

International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) 105,598 106,681 110,163 4,565

International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) 20,653 21,740 22,279 1,626

International Labor Organization (ILO) 94,320 85,927 86,915 -7,405

International Maritime Organization (IMO) 1,339 1,458 1,458 119

International Telecommunication Union (ITU) 10,761 10,782 10,860 99

UN Educational, Scientific & Cultural Org 

(UNESCO)2/ - - 77,764 77,764

Universal Postal Union (UPU) 2,350 2,462 2,514 164

World Health Organization (WHO) 109,403 109,879 109,879 476

World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) 1,210 1,231 1,243 33

World Meteorological Organization (WMO) 14,227 15,296 15,429 1,202

Subtotal, United Nations and Affiliated 

Agencies

1,149,011 1,065,952 1,201,390 52,379

Inter-American Organizations

Organization of American States (OAS) 48,513 48,513 48,513 -

Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) 63,094 66,436 68,709 5,615

Inter-American Inst. for Cooperation on Ag. 

(IICA)

16,359 16,360 16,360 1

Pan American Inst. of Geography and History 

(PAIGH)

324 324 324 -

Regional Organizations

45
($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Org. for Econ. Cooperation and Development 

(OECD)

83,039 82,154 83,261 222

North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) 56,498 64,316 68,369 11,871

NATO Parliamentary Assembly (NPA) 1,004 1,059 1,123 119

The Pacific Community (SPC) 1,599 1,583 1,621 22

Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) 1,044 1,059 1,074 30

Colombo Plan Council Technical Cooperation 

(CPCTC)

17 17 17 -

Subtotal, Regional Organizations 143,201 150,188 155,465 12,264

Other International Organizations

Organization Prohibition of Chemical Weapons 

(OPCW)

19,637 20,496 20,598 961

World Trade Organization (WTO) 26,517 25,613 24,990 -1,527

Customs Cooperation Council (CCC) 4,230 4,102 4,154 -76

Hague Conference on Private Int'l Law 

(HCOPIL)

281 276 286 5

International Agency for Research on Cancer 

(IARC)

1,997 1,955 2,009 12

Int'l Bureau Publication of Customs Tariffs 

(IBPCT)

- 163 169 169

Int'l Bureau Permanent Court Arbitration 

(IBPCA)

71 71 71 -

International Bureau of Weights and Measures 

(IBWM)

1,433 1,420 1,434 1

Int'l Ctr Study of Preserv & Restoration Cultural 

Prpty (ICCROM)

1,043 1,044 1,045 2

International Coffee Organization (ICO) 625 648 660 35

International Copper Study Group (ICSG) 38 34 40 2

International Cotton Advisory Committee 

(ICAC)

335 351 346 11

International Grains Council (IGC) 510 537 566 56

International Hydrographic Organization (IHO) 131 126 126 -5

Int'l Institute Unification of Private Law (IIUPL) 161 161 166 5

International Lead and Zinc Study Group 

(ILZSG)

34 35 34 -

46
($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

International Organization of Legal Metrology 

(IOLM)

153 148 148 -5

International Renewable Energy Agency 

(IRENA)

3,520 3,960 4,039 519

International Seed Testing Association (ISTA) 14 14 14 -

International Tropical Timber Organization 

(ITTO)

286 301 310 24

Int'l Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) 522 537 552 30

Int'l Union Protection New Varieties of Plants 

(UPOV)

292 293 293 1

World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) 195 195 199 4

Subtotal, Other International Organizations 62,025 62,480 62,249 224

Tax Reimbursement Agreements for U.S. 

Citizens

Tax Reimbursement Agreements 22,379 23,260 26,086 3,707

Subtotal, Tax Reimbursement Agreements for 

U.S. Citizens

22,379 23,260 26,086 3,707

Total Annual Requirements 1,504,906 1,433,513 1,579,096 74,190

Adjustment for Exchange Rate and Other Changes 5,094 34,189 - -5,094

Buydown of FY 2012 Requirements

-28,000 - - 28,000

Buydown of FY 2013 Requirements 69,000 -69,000 - -69,000

Buydown of FY 2014 Requirements

- 44,524 -44,524 -44,524

FY 2012, FY 2013 and FY 2014 Contingent 

Requirements

- 116,646 38,882 38,882

UN Mission in Frontline States 

(UNAMI/UNAMA) in OCO 

-101,300 -101,300 - 101,300

Total Contributions to International 

Organizations (CIO)

1,449,700 1,458,572 1,573,454 123,754

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175). 

2/ The Administration seeks Congressional support for legislation that would provide authority to waive legislative restrictions that, if triggered, 

would prohibit paying U.S. contributions to United Nations specialized agencies that grant the Palestinians the same standing as member states or 

full membership as a state. Should the Congress pass this waiver legislation, the FY 2014 funding specifically requested for UNESCO would 

cover the FY 2014 UNESCO assessment and the FY 2013 and FY 2014 Contingent Requirements funding would cover arrears which accrued in FY 

2012 and FY 2013. 

47
Contributions for International Peacekeeping Activities

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Contributions for International Peacekeeping 

Activities

1,828,182 1,839,370 2,094,661 266,479

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175). 

The Contributions for International Peacekeeping Activities (CIPA) account funds expenses of 

international peacekeeping activities directed to the maintenance or restoration of international peace and 

security. United Nations (UN) peacekeeping, which is the principal use for which CIPA funds are utilized, 

promotes the peaceful resolution of conflict.

The FY 2014 Request of $2.1 billion will provide funds for the U.S. share of assessed expenses for United 

Nations peacekeeping operations. Major highlights include: 

UNIFIL (Lebanon), which is anticipated to continue operating at current levels, with some cost 

reductions, through FY 2014; 

UNMIL (Liberia), where, as the overall security situation remains stable, the continued implementation 

of the security transition plan is expected to be under way in 2014, resulting in decreases in military 

personnel; 

UNOCI (Cote d’Ivoire), which is expected to work closely with the Government in 2014 to ensure the 

groundwork is ready for presidential elections in 2015; 

MINUSTAH (Haiti), which will continue to operate at a reconfigured and reduced level while 

providing operational support to help maintain a secure and stable environment, with a priority to help 

the Haitian National Police develop the capacities required to assume responsibility for security; 

UNAMID (Darfur, Sudan), which continues to draw down but will also continue to be vital in 

protecting civilians in the context of ongoing conflict between the Government of Sudan and Darfuri 

rebels, as well as increased criminal activity due to the absence of the rule of law; 

MONUSCO (Democratic Republic of the Congo), which will continue to focus on its core task of 

protection of civilians, but is expected to have additional expenses as it comes back to full authorized 

strength with the deployment of a new force intervention brigade to counter the threat from armed 

groups operating in the eastern DRC and new force multipliers, including UAVs, to support the 

mission; 

UNISFA (Abyei, Sudan/South Sudan), which will continue maintaining security in the volatile 

disputed region of Abyei and supporting the Joint Border Verification and Monitoring Mechanism 

(JVBMM) between Sudan and South Sudan; as the JBVMM deploys and becomes fully operational, 

the parties may require the mission to perform additional security-related tasks, thereby increasing its 

size and expenses; and 

UNMISS (South Sudan), which will continue at its current levels given substantial peacebuilding and 

security-related tasks required in the new country of South Sudan.

The FY 2014 request also includes $136.6 million for Support Office for the African Union Mission in 

Somalia (UNSOA). UNSOA will continue to provide a logistical support package for the Africa Union 

Mission in Somalia (AMISOM) for up to a maximum of 17,731 uniformed personnel including the 

reimbursement of contingent-owned equipment including force enablers and multipliers. The logistics 

package provides equipment and support services similar to that provided for a United Nations 

48
peacekeeping operation. UNSOA is working very closely with the UN Political Office for Somalia 

(UNPOS) and AMISOM to help create the necessary political and security conditions in Somalia, working 

in concert with the international community and other UN bodies. 

Resource Detail – CIPA Activities

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase /

Decrease 

from FY

2012

Activities

UN Peacekeeping Force in Cyprus (UNFICYP) 10,179 9,300 9,525 (654)

UN Disengagement Observer Force (UNDOF) 13,808 13,000 14,000 192

UN Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) 148,438 161,100 156,000 7,562

UN Mission Referendum West Sahara (MINURSO) 16,709 16,500 17,450 741

UN War Crimes Tribunal - Yugoslavia (ICTY) 19,994 23,780 20,375 381

UN War Crimes Tribunal Rwanda (ICTR) 11,547 18,342 10,550 (997)

UN Interim Administration Mission Kosovo 

(UNMIK) 13,305 13,480 13,400 95

UN Mission in Liberia (UNMIL) 140,617 135,400 132,510 (8,107)

UN Operations in Cote d'Ivoire (UNOCI) 224,143 139,900 163,000 (61,143)

UN Stabilization Mission in Haiti (MINUSTAH) 215,634 216,245 184,000 (31,634)

UN Integrated Mission in Timor-Leste (UNMIT) 47,976 40,358 0 (47,976)

UN-AU Hybrid Mission in Darfur (UNAMID) 410,351 512,330 410,351 0

UN Support Office for the AU Mission in Somalia 

(UNSOA) 0 0 136,600 136,600

UN Org. Stabilization Mission in the DRC 

(MONUSCO) 399,479 408,000 438,000 38,521

Int'l Residue Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals 

(MICT) 3,377 0 7,300 3,923

UN Interim Security Force for ABYEI (UNISFA) 59,279 60,000 78,000 18,721

UN Mission in Southern Sudan (UNMISS) 358,370 238,765 253,500 (104,870)

UN Presence in Syria 0 0 50,000 50,000

Mission Monitoring / Effectiveness Support 0 0 100 100

Subtotal, Activities 2,093,206 2,006,500 2,094,661 1,455

Total Annual Requirements 2,093,206 2,006,500 2,094,661 1,455

Application of FY 2011 Carryforward into FY 2012 (90,986) 0 0 90,986

Application of FY 2011 / FY 2012 Credits (232,166) 0 0 232,166

49
($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase /

Decrease 

from FY

2012

Application of FY 2012 / 2013 Credits 0 (109,846) 0 0

Application of FY 2012 Carryforward into FY 2013 58,128 (58,128) 0 (58,128)

FY 2013 Rate Adjustment 0 85,294 0 0

FY 2013 Unfunded Requirements 0 (84,450) 0 0

Total Contributions for International Peacekeeping 

Activities (CIPA) 1,828,182 1,839,370 2,094,661 266,479

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175). 

50
International Boundary and Water Commission

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

International Boundary and Water Commission 76,175 76,641 77,018 843

IBWC - Salaries and Expenses 44,722 44,996 45,618 896

IBWC - Construction 31,453 31,645 31,400 -53

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175). 

The International Boundary and Water Commission (IBWC) is a treaty-based organization comprised of 

U.S. and Mexican Sections. The Sections exercise respective national rights and obligations under 

U.S.-Mexico boundary and water treaties and related agreements to develop binational solutions to 

boundary and water problems arising along the 1,952-mile border. 

The FY 2014 request for the IBWC provides $45.6 million in salaries and expenses funding for the 

U.S. Section. This appropriation funds the operations and maintenance of headquarters in El Paso, Texas, 

as well as eight field offices and three satellite offices along the border. These activities afford protection 

of lives and property from floods in bordering communities. The appropriation also provides for the 

preservation of the international border and addresses binational sanitation issues through wastewater 

treatment. The appropriation also supports administrative and engineering activities. 

 

The FY 2014 request for the IBWC provides $31.4 million in construction funding for major renovations 

and construction that enable the storage, distribution, and delivery of international waters in the Rio 

Grande, Tijuana and Colorado Rivers. FY 2014 funding for Construction will continue multi-year efforts 

to improve Rio Grande levees and related flood control structures in the United States. The levees contain 

about 440 miles of river and interior floodway channel along three unique Rio Grande flood control 

systems. The funding will also support rehabilitation of the dams for which the IBWC is responsible and 

renovation of IBWC facilities. 

51
American Sections

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

American Sections 11,687 11,759 12,499 812

International Joint Commission 7,012 7,055 7,664 652

International Boundary Commission 2,279 2,293 2,449 170

Border Environment Cooperation Commission 2,396 2,411 2,386 -10

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175). 

International Joint Commission 

The FY 2014 request provides $7.7 million for the International Joint Commission (IJC). This funding will 

support the activities of the U.S. Section staff in Washington, D.C., and a binational Great Lakes Regional Office 

in Windsor, Canada. 

The IJC was established by the 1909 Boundary Waters Treaty as a cornerstone of U.S.-Canadian relations in the 

boundary region. Under the treaty, the IJC licenses and regulates certain water resource projects along the 

border that affect levels and flows on the other side, provides advice to the governments and conducts studies on 

critical issues of mutual concern, and apportions waters in transboundary river systems. 

The IJC also assists in efforts to prevent transboundary air pollution and improve air quality. The IJC’s model 

for preventing and resolving disputes is scientifically based, inclusive, and open to public input. Currently, 20 

active boards and task forces, plus various related technical working groups and committees, provide expert 

advice on both science and policy issues. 

International Boundary Commission 

The FY 2014 request provides $2.4 million for the International Boundary Commission (IBC). This funding 

will support the primary mission of the IBC to maintain an effective (accurately delineated and marked) 

boundary between the United States and Canada as prescribed by the 1925 Treaty of Washington. Maintaining 

such a boundary ensures the sovereignty of each nation over its territory by clearly establishing where one’s 

rights and responsibilities end, and the other’s begin, thus virtually eliminating the potential for serious and 

costly boundary disputes. 

The request will fund IBC operations and eight maintenance projects along the 5,525-mile boundary. The IBC 

maintains more than 5,500 land boundary monuments and more than 2,800 reference monuments. The request 

will also provide for mapping and maintenance of a Geographical Information System. 

Border Environment Cooperation Commission

The FY 2014 request provides $2.4 million for the Border Environment Cooperation Commission (BECC). 

The funding will continue the BECC’s work to improve health and environmental conditions for the 

U.S.-Mexico border region by strengthening cooperation among interested parties and supporting sustainable 

projects. A binational institution created in 1993, the BECC assists border communities in developing 

environmental infrastructure projects that meet certification requirements to be eligible to receive funding from 

the North American Development Bank or other institutions. These requirements help ensure that projects 

provide environmental and health benefits and are technically feasible and affordable. 

52
International Fisheries Commissions

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

International Fisheries Commissions 36,300 36,522 31,445 -4,855

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175). 

The FY 2014 request provides $31.4 million for International Fisheries Commissions (IFC) to fund the 

U.S. share of operating expenses for ten international fisheries commissions, the International Whaling 

Commission, two international marine science organizations, the Arctic Council, the Antarctic Treaty, 

international shark and sea turtle conservation initiatives, travel expenses of the U.S. Commissioners, and 

compensation payments to non-government employees for the days worked as U.S. Commissioners to the 

Pacific Salmon Commission. 

In most cases, U.S. contributions are mandated by treaties and agreements. Each commission facilitates 

international cooperation by conducting or coordinating scientific studies of fish stocks and other marine 

resources and their habitats and establishing common management measures to be implemented by member 

governments. Many also oversee the allocation of fishing rights to their members. 

Full payment of assessments is required to maintain voting privileges and influence in the commissions and 

organizations to advance the economic and conservation interests of the United States and important 

constituent groups. 

Through the ongoing efforts of the commissions and programs funded by this appropriation, many fishing 

areas that were nearly depleted are now yielding sustainable catches for U.S. commercial and sport 

fishermen, and some key endangered populations are recovering. The commercial and recreational 

fisheries managed by the commissions generate income of $12 billion to $15 billion annually and support 

thousands of jobs for the United States. 

53
Resource Detail – IFC Activities

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission 

(IATTC)

1,898 2,116 1,822 -76

Great Lakes Fishery Commission (GLFC) 23,709 22,270 19,174 -4,535

International Pacific Halibut Commission 

(IPHC)

4,500 5,066 4,350 -150

Pacific Salmon Commission (PSC) 3,250 3,563 3,050 -200

Other Marine Conservation Organizations 2,943 3,507 3,049 106

Arctic Council

- 139 125 125

Antarctic Treaty Secretariat (ATS) 61 89 70 9

Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic 

Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR)

117 161 138 21

Expenses of the U.S. Commissioners 167 173 140 -27

Int'l Commission for the Conservation of Atlanta 

Tunas (ICCAT)

325 356 265 -60

Int'l Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) 235 262 230 -5

International Sea Turtle Conservation Programs 173 223 200 27

International Shark Conservation Program 100 111 100 -

International Whaling Commission (IWC) 190 210 180 -10

North Atlantic Salmon Conservation Org. 

(NASCO)

55 80 72 17

North Pacific Anadromous Fish Commission 

(NPAFC)

187 212 190 3

North Pacific Marine Science Organization 

(PICES)

118 144 129 11

Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization 

(NAFO)

298 328 295 -3

Western & Central Pacific Fisheries Commission 

(WCPFC)

917 1,019 915 -2

Total 36,300 36,522 31,445 -4,855

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175). 

54
The Asia Foundation

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

The Asia Foundation 17,000 17,104 17,000 -

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175). 

The Asia Foundation is a private, non-profit organization that advances U.S. interests in the Asia-Pacific 

region. Incorporated and headquartered in California, the Asia Foundation operates programs through 17 

offices in Asia. The Asia Foundation’s programs and grants support democratic initiatives, governance 

and economic reform, expansion of rule of law, women’s empowerment, regional cooperation, and 

peaceful relations between the United States and Asia. 

Under the Asia Foundation Act of 1983, appropriated funds are the Asia Foundation’s core funding source. 

The FY 2014 request of $17 million will enable the Asia Foundation to continue its work with Asian 

governments, nongovernmental organizations, and the private sector. It will also support the 

Administration’s “Asia Rebalancing” initiative and the Asia Foundation’s efforts to establish a permanent 

presence in Burma. 

 

55
Center for Middle Eastern-Western Dialogue

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Center for Middle Eastern-Western Dialogue2/ 840 845 90 -750

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175). 

2/ The FY 2012 level reflects the amount provided in the conference report to the FY 2012 Appropriations Act. Actual interest earned for FY 2012 

was $29,592. 

The International Center for Middle Eastern-Western Dialogue (Hollings Center) was established by the 

Congress to further scholarship and implement programs to open channels of communication and deepen 

cross-cultural understanding between the United States and nations with predominantly Muslim 

populations. The FY 2014 request seeks appropriation authority to spend a projected $90,000 in estimated 

earnings from the Hollings Center’s trust fund on operations, support for conferences, programs, and 

grants. This represents a $750,000 decrease from the FY 2012 actual level due to interest earnings 

reestimates. In addition, the Department of State has determined funds previously made available to the 

Trust Fund principle may be utilized for operations to provide further support to the Hollings Center. 

56
Eisenhower Exchange Fellowship Program

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Eisenhower Exchange Fellowship Program2/ 500 503 400 -100

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175). 

2/ The FY 2012 level reflects the amount provided in the conference report to the FY 2012 Appropriations Act. Actual interest earned in FY 2012 

was $326,640. 

The Eisenhower Exchange Fellowship Program (EEF) builds international understanding by bringing 

rising leaders to the United States, and sending their American counterparts abroad, on custom designed 

professional programs. The EEF trust fund will provide an estimated $400,000 in interest earnings in 

FY 2014 to support these exchanges. The FY 2014 request seeks the authority to spend these estimated 

earnings on the fellowship fund. 

57
Israeli Arab Scholarship Program

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Israeli Arab Scholarship Program2/ 375 377 13 -363

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175). 

2/ The FY 2012 level reflects the amount provided in the conference report to the FY 2012 Appropriations Act. Actual net interest earned in 

FY 2012 was $5,597. 

The Israeli Arab Scholarship Program (IASP) funds scholarship programs for Israeli Arabs to attend 

institutions of higher education in the United States. The IASP trust fund will provide an estimated 

$12,500 in interest earnings in FY 2014 to support such activities to be implemented by the Bureau of 

Education and Cultural Affairs. Due to the low interest earned by this trust fund, the Department intends to 

allow for the accumulation of interest and earnings over time to effectively implement the scholarship 

program. In addition, opportunities for highly qualified Israeli-Arab graduate students to attend institutions 

of higher education in the U.S. will be executed as part of the Fulbright program. 

58
East-West Center

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

East-West Center 16,700 16,802 10,800 -5,900

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175). 

The Center for Cultural and Technical Interchange between East and West (East-West Center) was 

established by the Congress in 1960 to promote understanding and good relations between the United States 

and the nations of the Asia-Pacific region. Located in Hawaii, the East-West Center has engaged more 

than 55,000 participants in its programs since its inception, including at the highest political levels in some 

nations. It draws on extensive individual and institutional ties to work effectively on critical regional 

issues. 

The FY 2014 request of $10.8 million will provide continued funding for the East-West Center’s programs 

of cooperative research, study, and exchange. At this budgetary level, the Center projects that it will 

engage 2,300 participants in its activities in FY 2014, and generate an estimated $7 million from other 

sources, such as the private sector and foundations. 

59
National Endowment for Democracy

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

National Endowment for Democracy 117,764 118,485 103,450 -14,314

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175). 

The National Endowment for Democracy (NED) was established by the Congress in 1983 to strengthen 

democratic institutions around the world. Through a worldwide grants program, NED assists those 

working abroad to build democratic institutions and spread democratic values. 

NED’s four affiliated core institutes – the American Center for International Labor Solidarity, the Center 

for International Private Enterprise, the International Republican Institute, and the National Democratic 

Institute – represent public American institutions working in sectors critical to the development of 

democracy. NED also supports initiatives of nongovernmental organizations fostering independent 

media, human rights, and other essential democratic elements. 

Directed by a bipartisan board, NED makes approximately 1,200 grants per year in nearly 100 countries. 

NED’s grants advance long-term U.S. interests and address immediate needs in strengthening democracy, 

human rights, and the rule of law. 

The FY 2014 request for NED of $103.5 million will enable NED to continue a strong grants program in 

priority countries and regions, such as the Middle East and North Africa. 

60
Broadcasting Board of Governors

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Broadcasting Board of Governors 751,530 756,102 731,080 -20,450

International Broadcasting Operations 740,100 744,629 722,580 -17,520

Broadcasting Capital Improvements 7,030 7,073 8,500 1,470

Overseas Contingency Operations 4,400 4,400 - -4,400

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175).

The FY 2014 request provides $722.6 million for International Broadcasting Operations. Through this 

appropriation, the Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG) funds operations of its broadcasting 

organizations, as well as related program delivery and support activities.

The BBG is an independent Federal entity responsible for all U.S. non-military international broadcasting 

programs. BBG broadcasting organizations include the Voice of America (VOA), Radio Free 

Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL), Radio Free Asia (RFA), Radio and TV Marti, and the Middle East 

Broadcasting Networks (MBN) – Radio Sawa and Alhurra Television.

The BBG mission is to inform, engage, and connect people around the world in support of freedom and 

democracy. BBG radio, television, and Internet programs reach more than 175 million people each week 

in 59 languages.

The FY 2014 Budget Request would enable the Agency to support its most critical base operations and 

capital requirements as well as provide additional funds to support a limited number of new initiatives 

including: countering extremism in Africa, engaging new audiences in the Middle East, China, and 

Southeast Asia, and bolstering broadcast infrastructure. The request also contains reductions including 

rationalizing distribution through cuts to outmoded delivery platforms; making language service 

reductions to reduce overlap, increase cooperation and ensure that broadcasters will provide 

complementary content; streamlining and restructuring central news operations; realizing savings in 

information technology; and making other administrative and support reductions where feasible.

The FY 2014 request also provides $8.5 million for Broadcasting Capital Improvements to maintain the 

worldwide transmission network of the Broadcasting Board of Governors, including the security 

requirements of facilities. The request includes funding for maintenance, repairs, and improvements to 

existing systems, as well as the following initiatives: realigning shortwave transmission assets; 

improving digital media management and access to digital networks; and upgrading the global 

distribution system.

61
United States Institute of Peace

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

United States Institute of Peace 39,000 39,187 35,687 -3,313

Enduring 30,589 30,776 35,687 5,098

Overseas Contingency Operations 8,411 8,411 - -8,411

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175).

The United States Institute of Peace (USIP) is an independent, bipartisan quasi-official institution 

established by Congress to develop, apply, foster, and continuously update cost-effective strategies and 

tools to prevent, mitigate, and resolve violent international conflicts.

The FY 2014 request for USIP provides $35.7 million for preventing, mitigating, and resolving violent 

international conflicts, innovation in peace-building through cutting edge research and development, and 

improving global peace-building capacity.

62
FY 2012 

Enduring Actual

FY 2012 OCO 

Actual

FY 2012 Actual 

Total

FY 2013 CR 

Enduring1

FY 2013 CR 

OCO1

FY 2013 CR 

Total1

FY 2014 Request 

Enduring

FY 2014 

Request OCO

FY 2014 

Request Total

Change from FY 

2012 Actual to FY 

2014 Request

FOREIGN OPERATIONS 28,929,910 6,575,330 35,505,240 29,121,805 6,575,330 35,697,135 32,874,556 2,308,200 35,182,756 (322,484)

U.S Agency for International Development 1,268,500 259,500 1,528,000 1,276,264 259,500 1,535,764 1,500,340 71,000 1,571,340 43,340

 USAID Operating Expenses (OE) 1,092,300 255,000 1,347,300 1,098,985 255,000 1,353,985 1,328,200 71,000 1,399,200 51,900

 Conflict Stabilization Operations (CSO) - - - - - - - - - -

 USAID Capital Investment Fund (CIF) 129,700 - 129,700 130,494 - 130,494 117,940 - 117,940 (11,760)

 USAID Inspector General Operating Expenses 46,500 4,500 51,000 46,785 4,500 51,285 54,200 - 54,200 3,200

Bilateral Economic Assistance 16,995,584 3,834,516 20,830,100 16,994,155 3,177,016 20,171,171 20,045,626 1,382,200 21,427,826 597,726

 Global Health Programs (USAID and State)2 8,172,660 - 8,172,660 8,217,847 - 8,217,847 8,315,000 - 8,315,000 142,340

 Global Health Programs - USAID [2,629,800] - [2,629,800] [2,641,065] - [2,641,065] [2,645,000] - [2,645,000] [15,200]

 Global Health Programs - State [5,542,860] - [5,542,860] [5,576,782] - [5,576,782] [5,670,000] - [5,670,000] [127,140]

 Development Assistance (DA) 2,519,950 - 2,519,950 2,535,372 2,535,372 2,837,812 - 2,837,812 317,862

 International Disaster Assistance (IDA)3 825,000 270,000 1,095,000 830,049 150,000 980,049 2,045,000 - 2,045,000 950,000

 Emergency Food Assistance Contingency Fund - - - - - - 75,000 - 75,000 75,000

 Transition Initiatives (TI)4 50,141 43,554 93,695 50,448 6,554 57,002 57,600 - 57,600 (36,095)

 Complex Crises Fund (CCF)3 10,000 40,000 50,000 10,061 30,000 40,061 40,000 - 40,000 (10,000)

 Development Credit Authority - Subsidy (DCA) [40,000] - [40,000] [40,000] [40,000] [40,000] - [40,000] -

 Development Credit Authority - Administrative Expenses 8,300 - 8,300 8,351 - 8,351 8,200 - 8,200 (100)

 Economic Support Fund (ESF)3, 4, 5 2,994,745 3,151,962 6,146,707 2,912,461 2,761,462 5,673,923 4,076,054 1,382,200 5,458,254 (688,453)

 Middle East and North Africa Incentive Fund - - - - - - 580,000 - 580,000 580,000

 Democracy Fund 114,770 - 114,770 115,472 - 115,472 - - - (114,770)

 Assistance for Europe, Eurasia and Central Asia (AEECA) 626,718 - 626,718 630,554 - 630,554 - - - (626,718)

 Migration and Refugee Assistance (MRA)3 1,646,100 329,000 1,975,100 1,656,174 229,000 1,885,174 1,760,960 - 1,760,960 (214,140)

 U.S. Emergency Refugee and Migration Assistance (ERMA) 27,200 - 27,200 27,366 - 27,366 250,000 - 250,000 222,800

Independent Agencies 1,325,700 - 1,325,700 1,333,813 - 1,333,813 1,319,100 - 1,319,100 (6,600)

 Peace Corps 375,000 - 375,000 377,295 - 377,295 378,800 - 378,800 3,800

 Millennium Challenge Corporation 898,200 - 898,200 903,697 - 903,697 898,200 - 898,200 -

 Inter-American Foundation 22,500 - 22,500 22,638 - 22,638 18,100 - 18,100 (4,400)

 African Development Foundation 30,000 - 30,000 30,184 - 30,184 24,000 - 24,000 (6,000)

Department of Treasury 37,448 1,552 39,000 37,677 1,552 39,229 23,500 - 23,500 (15,500)

 Treasury Technical Assistance 25,448 1,552 27,000 25,604 1,552 27,156 23,500 - 23,500 (3,500)

 Debt Restructuring 12,000 - 12,000 12,073 - 12,073 - - - (12,000)

International Security Assistance 7,269,819 2,479,762 9,749,581 7,314,309 3,137,262 10,451,571 7,669,384 855,000 8,524,384 (1,225,197)

 International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement (INCLE)4 1,061,100 574,605 1,635,705 1,067,594 983,605 2,051,199 1,129,727 344,000 1,473,727 (161,978)

 Nonproliferation, Antiterrorism, Demining and Related Programs (NADR)4 590,113 121,157 711,270 593,724 120,657 714,381 616,125 - 616,125 (95,145)

 Peacekeeping Operations (PKO)3, 4 302,818 207,000 509,818 304,671 81,000 385,671 347,000 - 347,000 (162,818)

 International Military Education and Training (IMET) 105,788 - 105,788 106,435 - 106,435 105,573 - 105,573 (215)

 Foreign Military Financing (FMF) 5,210,000 1,102,000 6,312,000 5,241,885 1,102,000 6,343,885 5,445,959 511,000 5,956,959 (355,041)

 Pakistan Counterinsurgency Capability Fund (PCCF)3 - 452,000 452,000 - 850,000 850,000 - - - (452,000)

 Global Security Contingency Fund3 - 23,000 23,000 - - - 25,000 - 25,000 2,000

FOREIGN ASSISTANCE REQUEST

($000)

63
FY 2012 

Enduring Actual

FY 2012 OCO 

Actual

FY 2012 Actual 

Total

FY 2013 CR 

Enduring1

FY 2013 CR 

OCO1

FY 2013 CR 

Total1

FY 2014 Request 

Enduring

FY 2014 

Request OCO

FY 2014 

Request Total

Change from FY 

2012 Actual to FY 

2014 Request

FOREIGN ASSISTANCE REQUEST

($000)

 Special Defense Acquisition Fund - - - - - - - - - -

Multilateral Economic Assistance 2,966,293 - 2,966,293 2,989,277 - 2,989,277 3,196,424 - 3,196,424 230,131

 International Organizations and Programs2 343,905 - 343,905 350,839 - 350,839 320,645 - 320,645 (23,260)

International Financial Institutions (IFIs) 2,622,388 - 2,622,388 2,638,438 - 2,638,438 2,875,779 - 2,875,779 253,391

 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development 117,364 - 117,364 118,083 - 118,083 186,957 - 186,957 69,593

 International Development Association (IDA) 1,325,000 - 1,325,000 1,333,109 - 1,333,109 1,358,500 - 1,358,500 33,500

 African Development Bank 32,418 - 32,418 32,616 - 32,616 32,418 - 32,418 -

 African Development Fund (AfDF) 172,500 - 172,500 173,556 - 173,556 195,000 - 195,000 22,500

 Asian Development Bank 106,586 - 106,586 107,238 - 107,238 106,586 - 106,586 -

 Asian Development Fund 100,000 - 100,000 100,612 - 100,612 115,250 - 115,250 15,250

 Inter-American Development Bank 75,000 - 75,000 75,459 - 75,459 102,020 - 102,020 27,020

 Inter-American Investment Corporation 4,670 - 4,670 4,699 - 4,699 - - - (4,670)

 Enterprise for the Americas Multilateral Investment Fund 25,000 - 25,000 25,153 - 25,153 6,298 - 6,298 (18,702)

 IDA Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative 167,000 - 167,000 168,022 - 168,022 145,300 - 145,300 (21,700)

 AfDF Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative 7,500 - 7,500 7,546 - 7,546 30,000 - 30,000 22,500

 Global Environment Facility (GEF) 89,820 - 89,820 90,370 - 90,370 143,750 - 143,750 53,930

 Clean Technology Fund 184,630 - 184,630 185,760 - 185,760 215,700 - 215,700 31,070

 Strategic Climate Fund 49,900 - 49,900 50,205 - 50,205 68,000 - 68,000 18,100

 International Fund for Agricultural Development 30,000 - 30,000 30,184 - 30,184 30,000 - 30,000 -

 Global Agriculture and Food Security Program 135,000 - 135,000 135,826 - 135,826 135,000 - 135,000 -

 Middle East and North Africa Transition Fund - - - - - - 5,000 - 5,000 5,000

Export & Investment Assistance (1,015,434) - (1,015,434) (906,192) - (906,192) (967,138) - (967,138) 48,296

 Export-Import Bank (799,700) - (799,700) (752,925) - (752,925) (831,600) - (831,600) (31,900)

 Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC) (265,734) - (265,734) (203,573) - (203,573) (198,200) - (198,200) 67,534

 Trade and Development Agency 50,000 - 50,000 50,306 - 50,306 62,662 - 62,662 12,662

Related International Affairs Accounts 82,000 - 82,000 82,502 - 82,502 87,320 - 87,320 5,320

 International Trade Commission 80,000 - 80,000 80,490 - 80,490 85,102 - 85,102 5,102

 Foreign Claims Settlement Commission 2,000 - 2,000 2,012 - 2,012 2,218 - 2,218 218

Department of Agriculture 1,650,000 - 1,650,000 1,660,098 - 1,660,098 185,126 - 185,126 (1,464,874)

 Food for Peace Act Title II 1,466,000 - 1,466,000 1,474,972 - 1,474,972 - - - (1,466,000)

 McGovern-Dole International Food for Education and Child Nutrition Programs 184,000 - 184,000 185,126 - 185,126 185,126 - 185,126 1,126

Rescissions

Total Rescissions Foreign Operations (500,000) - (500,000) (400,000) - (400,000) - - - 500,000

Bilateral Economic Assistance (100,000) - (100,000) - - - - - - 100,000

 Economic Support Fund (ESF) (100,000) - (100,000) - - - - - - 100,000

64
FY 2012 

Enduring Actual

FY 2012 OCO 

Actual

FY 2012 Actual 

Total

FY 2013 CR 

Enduring1

FY 2013 CR 

OCO1

FY 2013 CR 

Total1

FY 2014 Request 

Enduring

FY 2014 

Request OCO

FY 2014 

Request Total

Change from FY 

2012 Actual to FY 

2014 Request

FOREIGN ASSISTANCE REQUEST

($000)

Export & Investment Assistance (400,000) - (400,000) (400,000) - (400,000) - - - 400,000

 Export-Import Bank (400,000) - (400,000) (400,000) - (400,000) - - - 400,000

Footnotes

5/ The FY 2012 OCO Actual level reflects the transfer of $10 million from the Economic Support Fund to the International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement account.

4/ The FY 2012 OCO Actual level reflects the transfer of $409 million from the International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement account to the Economic Support Fund ($285.5 million), Transition Initiatives ($37 million), Nonproliferation, 

Antiterrorism, Demining and Related Programs ($0.5 million), Peacekeeping Operations ($86 million) accounts.

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175).

2/ The FY 2012 Enduring Actual level reflects the transfer of $4.8 million from the International Organizations and Programs account to the Global Health Programs-USAID account.

3/ The FY 2012 OCO Actual level reflects the transfer of $398 million from the Pakistan Counterinsurgency Capability Fund to the Economic Support Fund ($105 million), Global Security Contingency Fund ($23 million), Complex Crises Fund ($10 

million), Peacekeeping Operations ($40 million), International Disaster Assistance ($120 million) and Migration and Refugee Assistance ($100 million) accounts.

65
USAID Operating Expenses

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

USAID Operating Expenses 1,347,300 1,353,985 1,399,200 51,900

Enduring 1,092,300 1,098,985 1,328,200 235,900

Overseas Contingency Operations 255,000 255,000 71,000 -184,000

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175).

The Quadrennial Diplomacy and Development Review (QDDR) calls for “elevating American ‘civilian 

power’ to better advance our national interests and be a better partner with the U.S. military.” The 

U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) Operating Expenses (OE) request provides the 

resources to respond to this challenge. It includes funding to maintain the progress achieved under the 

Development Leadership Initiative (DLI), which strengthened the U.S. Direct Hire (USDH) overseas 

workforce to meet U.S. foreign policy objectives and support Presidential initiatives. It also includes 

funding to strengthen Civil Service capacity to support the USAID FORWARD agenda, which seeks to 

transform the Agency by reforming procurement systems, building local capacity in host countries, and 

pioneering scientific, technological, and innovative approaches to traditional development challenges.

For FY 2014, the $1,328 million USAID OE request for enduring operations will fund the administrative 

costs of managing USAID programs. The USAID OE budget covers salaries and benefits, overseas and 

Washington operations, and central support including human capital initiatives, security, and information 

technology (IT).

FY 2014 funds will also cover salaries, operational expenses, and the operational costs for the enduring 

programs in the frontline states of Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq. Separately, an additional $71 million 

is requested in Overseas Contingency Operations for extraordinary costs for Afghanistan.

Below are highlights of the FY 2014 request and the $108.2 million in other funding sources, such as 

recoveries, reimbursements, and trust funds, USAID expects to have available in FY 2014. 

Highlights:

• Development Leadership Initiative ($32.8 million): The request will support the annualized, 

recurring costs of the 100 Foreign Service Officers (FSOs) funded in FY 2011, but hired in FY 2012, 

that will not yet be deployed to permanent positions by FY 2014. 

• Civil Service Capacity ($4 million): The request will fund 22 additional Civil Service staff to 

support the continued implementation of procurement reform, establishment of the Office of Science 

and Technology, and increased responsibilities in the Middle East region. 

• Overseas Operations ($819.5 million): The request includes funding for all U.S. Direct Hire 

(USDH) salaries and benefits for FSOs serving overseas and the costs associated with securing and 

maintaining mission operations - including the enduring programs in the frontline states of 

Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq - such as the salaries of local staff, travel, office and residential space, 

and International Cooperative Administrative Support Services. This funding also covers the costs 

66
for the third phase of overseas comparability pay. 

• Washington Operations ($353.9 million): Funding will cover USDH salaries and benefits for Civil 

Service and Foreign Service employees working in Washington, general office support, and advisory 

and assistance services. 

• Central Support ($226.1 million): The request includes funding for IT, office space, and other 

mandatory services. 

Details of the FY 2014 OCO request of $71 million for USAID OE are addressed in the OCO chapter. 

67
USAID Capital Investment Fund

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

USAID Capital Investment Fund 129,700 130,494 117,940 -11,760

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175).

The FY 2014 request for the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) Capital Investment 

Fund of $117.9 million will support capital investments in information technology, facility construction 

and real-property maintenance. The USAID Operating Expenses account funds the annual operating and 

maintenance costs of information systems and facilities infrastructure.

Highlights:

• Facility Construction ($82.8 million): The request will support USAID’s full cost of participation 

in the Capital Security Cost Sharing Program. The Secure Embassy Construction and 

Counterterrorism Act of 1999 (P.L. 106-113) requires USAID to co-locate on new embassy 

compounds. The FY 2014 request will support the building of one new embassy compound where 

there is a USAID presence: N'Djamena, Chad. 

• Information Technology ($27.4 million): Funding focuses on continuing to implement the Federal 

initiatives of Cloud First, Mobility, Open Government, Digital Government, and the 25-Point 

Implementation Plan to Reform Federal Information Technology Management. In addition, the 

FY 2014 request will fund upgrades to core, mission-critical accounting and acquisitions systems and 

participation in E-Government initiatives, as well as continue cyber security investments in identity 

management, multi-factor authentication, single-sign-on integration, threat management, and 

classified encrypted communications. Investment in these initiatives will allow USAID to provide 

staff with productivity-enhancing tools and better position the Agency to create a standard, 

shared-enterprise structure. 

• Real Property Maintenance ($7.7 million): The request will establish a real property maintenance 

fund that will allow the Agency to develop and sustain a maintenance-and-repair program for the 

properties it owns. The fund will reduce the expensive future cost of major repairs, limit health and 

safety risks, increase efficiencies and protect value, and align with best practices. 

68
USAID Inspector General Operating Expenses

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

USAID Inspector General Operating Expenses 51,000 51,285 54,200 3,200

Enduring 46,500 46,785 54,200 7,700

Overseas Contingency Operations 4,500 4,500 - -4,500

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175).

The FY 2014 request of $54.2 million for the Office of Inspector General (OIG) for the U.S. Agency for 

International Development (USAID) will fund salaries, benefits, and operating expenses for OIG staff. 

The funding supports audit and investigative coverage of USAID, African Development Foundation 

(ADF), and Inter-American Foundation (IAF) programs and activities. This mandatory oversight 

responsibility involves performing audits of these organizations’ annual financial statements and 

information security management.

OIG provides oversight for multiple programmatic and operating areas in approximately 100 countries 

and is responsible for overseeing approximately $31 billion in foreign assistance funding for USAID, the 

ADF, the IAF, the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC), and limited oversight of the Overseas 

Private Investment Corporation (OPIC). 

 

OIG also assists USAID, ADF, and IAF in protecting and maintaining the integrity of their organizations 

and programs by providing information and recommendations to improve program and operational 

performance, as well as by working to detect and prevent waste, fraud, and abuse in the agencies' 

activities.

OIG will focus a portion of its FY 2014 resources on USAID’s high-priority development programs in 

Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Haiti that promote economic growth, education, health, good 

governance, and democracy. This funding will also allow OIG to prioritize oversight of USAID’s 

programs in West Bank and Gaza, and elsewhere in the Middle East, along with health programs 

worldwide. 

69
Global Health Programs

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Global Health Programs 8,172,660 8,217,847 8,315,000 142,340

Global Health Programs – USAID2 2,629,800 2,641,065 2,645,000 15,200

Global Health Programs - State 5,542,860 5,576,782 5,670,000 127,140

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175).

2/ The FY 2012 Enduring Actual level reflects the transfer of $4.8 million from the International Organizations and Programs account to the 

Global Health Programs-USAID account.

The Global Health Programs account funds health-related foreign assistance managed by the Department 

of State and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). Investments in global health 

protect Americans at home and abroad, strengthen fragile or failing states, promote social and economic 

progress, and support the rise of capable partners who can help to solve regional and global problems. 

U.S. Government efforts in global health are a signature of American leadership in the world, including 

the United States' historic commitment to the treatment, care, and prevention of HIV/AIDS. 

The FY 2014 budget reflects a comprehensive and integrated global health strategy toward achieving an 

AIDS-free generation and ending preventable child and maternal deaths through the Administration’s 

Global Health Initiative (GHI). GHI draws upon investments made through the President's Emergency 

Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), the President's Malaria Initiative (PMI), maternal and child health, 

family planning and reproductive health, tuberculosis, neglected tropical diseases, and other programs, 

and expands their reach by linking individual programs in an integrated system of care. GHI harnesses 

the power of the U.S. Government, other governments and donors, private partnerships and developing 

countries to improve global health in a coordinated, efficient and strategic way. The approach will save 

millions of lives while fostering sustainable health care delivery systems that can address the full range of 

developing country health needs. The Initiative’s overall emphases are improving health outcomes 

through a focus on women, girls, and gender equity; increasing impact through strategic coordination and 

integration; strengthening and leveraging key multilateral organizations and global health partnerships; 

encouraging country ownership and investing in country-led plans; building sustainability through 

investments in health systems strengthening; improving metrics, monitoring, and evaluation; and 

promoting research, development, and innovation. As these programs are implemented, USAID and 

State will continue working to enhance the integration of quality interventions with the broader health and 

development programs of the U.S. Government, country partners, multilateral organizations, and other 

donors. The response to global health problems is a shared responsibility that cannot be met by one 

nation alone. We will challenge the global community to also provide leadership in building healthier, 

stronger, more self-sufficient nations in the developing world. 

For FY 2014, a total of $8,315 million is requested for Global Health Programs (GHP) under two 

subaccounts: $2,645 million GHP-USAID for USAID-administered programs and $5,670 million 

GHP-State for State-administered programs. The programs will be focused on three key areas: Saving 

Lives of Mothers and Children; Creating an AIDS-free Generation; and Protecting Communities from 

Other Infectious Diseases. For all programs, resources will be used to support interventions intended to 

achieve ambitious targets on global health indicators. They will be focused toward countries with the 

highest need, demonstrable commitment to achieving sustainable health impacts, and the greatest 

70
potential to leverage U.S. Government programs and platforms, as well as those of other partners and 

donors. 

Saving Lives of Mothers and Children

 

The world has made remarkable strides in both public and private efforts toward saving the lives of 

women and children, yet maternal and child mortality remains a critical problem in developing countries. 

Child deaths decreased by 42 percent from 1990 to 2011, and maternal deaths decreased by 47 percent 

from 1990 to 2010. Nevertheless, the most recent estimates indicate that each year nearly 300,000 

women die from pregnancy-related causes and there are 6.9 million deaths of children under five–43 

percent of which are in the first month of life, a fraction which has been consistently increasing over time. 

Approximately three-quarters of these child and maternal deaths are preventable with currently available 

interventions. 

In June 2012, the U.S. Government led the charge to renew the global effort to end preventable child 

death. Co-convened with the Governments of Ethiopia and India, and in coordination with UNICEF, the 

two-day Call to Action brought the global community together to commit to accelerating reductions in 

child mortality in both the short- and long-term. Together with over 700 global leaders, we proposed a 

target that would truly represent an end to preventable child deaths, with all countries having fewer than 

20 deaths per 1,000 live births, the current approximate upper limit of child mortality in OECD countries, 

by 2035. Achieving this rate will save an additional 5 million children’s lives every year. An analogous 

effort to define “ending preventable maternal deaths” is underway.

Ending preventable child and maternal deaths is not an outcome of U.S. Government assistance alone, nor 

solely the outcome of narrowly-defined programs in maternal and child health (MCH). Rather, 

improvements in mortality outcomes are the result of increasingly effective efforts to link diverse health 

programs – in MCH, in malaria, in family planning’s contribution to the healthy timing and spacing of 

pregnancy, in nutrition, in HIV/AIDS, in sanitation and hygiene improvement – all of these contribute to 

ending preventable child and maternal deaths.

Highlights: 

Maternal and Child Health (MCH) ($680 million) funding will support programs that work with 

country and global partners to increase the wide-spread availability and use of proven life-saving 

interventions, and to strengthen the delivery systems to ensure the long term sustainability of these 

programs. USAID will extend coverage of proven, high-impact interventions to the most vulnerable 

populations in high-burden countries. 

Funding will support a limited set of high-impact interventions that will accelerate reduction of maternal 

and newborn mortality, including the introduction and scale-up of new child vaccines. For FY 2014, 

increased funding ($175 million) is requested within MCH for the GAVI Alliance, to complete the 

Administration's historic three-year, $450 million pledge to this important partner. These funds will 

support the introduction of new vaccines, especially pneumococcal and rotavirus vaccines that have the 

greatest potential additional impact on child survival. Other priority child health interventions include 

essential newborn care; prevention and treatment of diarrheal disease, including increased availability and 

use of household and community-level water, sanitation and hygiene; and expanded prevention and 

treatment of pneumonia, particularly at the community level. With further development of the 

public-private partnerships Helping Babies Breathe and Survive and Thrive, key causes of neonatal 

mortality, such as birth asphyxia, will receive increased attention. The maternal health program will 

provide support for essential and long-term health system improvements. Its impact will be enhanced 

through programs aimed at reducing maternal mortality during labor, delivery, and the first vital 24 hours 

71
postpartum, when most deaths from childbirth occur – the highest point of risk during labor and delivery. 

Resources will be provided to combat maternal mortality with expanded coverage of preventive and 

life-saving interventions such as prevention and management of post-partum hemorrhage, hypertensive 

disorders of pregnancy, and sepsis, as well as contributory causes of maternal death such as anemia. 

Simultaneously, resources will support efforts to build the health systems capability required to provide 

functioning referral systems and comprehensive obstetric care. The MCH program will also work to 

leverage investments in other health programs, particularly family planning and reproductive health, 

nutrition, and infectious diseases. 

Malaria ($670 million) funding will continue to support the comprehensive strategy of the President’s 

Malaria Initiative (PMI), which combines prevention and treatment approaches and integrates these 

interventions with other priority health services. In 2012, there were an estimated 219 million malaria 

cases and 660,000 malaria deaths worldwide. Since January 2009, PMI has distributed more than 117 

million artemisinin combination treatments, 52 million insecticide-treated mosquito nets (ITNs), and 12 

million intermittent preventive treatments for pregnant women. During FY 2012 alone, over 50 million 

people were protected against malaria with a prevention measure (ITNs and/or indoor residual spraying). 

In 12 of the 15 original PMI countries (Angola, Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya, Madagascar, Malawi, 

Mozambique, Rwanda, Senegal, Tanzania, Uganda, and Zambia) declines in all-cause mortality rates 

amount children under five have been observed - ranging from 16 percent (in Malawi) and 50 percent (in 

Rwanda). 

While a variety of factors may be influencing these declines, malaria prevention and control efforts are 

playing a major role in these reductions. Ninety percent of all malaria deaths occur in sub-Saharan 

Africa, and the vast majority of these deaths are among children under five. USAID will continue to 

scale up malaria prevention and control activities and invest in strengthening delivery platforms in up to 

24 African countries as well as support the scale-up of efforts to contain the spread of multidrug-resistant 

malaria in the Greater Mekong region of Southeast Asia and the Amazon Basin of South America. PMI 

will support host countries’ national malaria control programs and strengthen local capacity to expand the 

use of four highly effective malaria prevention and treatment measures, including indoor residual 

spraying, long-lasting insecticide-treated mosquito nets, artemisinin-based combination therapies to treat 

acute illnesses, and interventions to prevent malaria in pregnancy. Funding will also continue to support 

the development of new malaria vaccine candidates, antimalarial drugs, and other malaria-related research 

with multilateral donors. 

 

Family Planning and Reproductive Health ($534 million) funding will support programs that improve 

and expand access to high-quality voluntary family planning services and information, as well as other 

reproductive health care and priority health services. About 220 million women in the developing world 

have an unmet need for family planning, resulting in 53 million unintended pregnancies and 25 million 

abortions annually. In 2011 and 2012, USAID's family planning and reproductive health programs 

averted more than 12 million unintended pregnancies. Family planning (FP) is an essential intervention 

for the health of mothers and children, contributing to reduced maternal mortality (through preventing 

unintended pregnancy), healthier children (through breastfeeding), and reduced infant mortality (through 

better birth spacing). Activities will be directed toward enhancing the ability of couples to decide the 

number, timing, and spacing of births and toward reducing abortion and maternal, infant, and child 

mortality and morbidity. Activities will also support the key elements of successful FP programs, 

including mobilizing demand for modern family planning services through behavior change 

communication; commodity supply and logistics; service delivery; policy analysis and planning; 

biomedical, social science, and program research; knowledge management; and monitoring and 

evaluation. Priority areas include leveraging opportunities to expand services through MCH and HIV 

platforms; contraceptive security; community-based approaches; expanding access to voluntary 

long-acting and permanent contraceptive methods; promoting healthy birth spacing; and focusing on 

72
cross-cutting issues of gender, youth, and equity. 

 

Nutrition ($95 million) More than 200 million children under age five and one in three women in the 

developing world suffers from undernutrition. Undernutrition contributes to 35 percent of child deaths 

and leads to irreversible losses to children’s cognitive development, resulting in lower educational 

attainment and lower wages. Since 2008, forty-two million infants, children, and women have been 

provided core nutrition interventions. Nutrition activities will be linked with the Feed the Future 

Initiative and evidence-based interventions that focus on the prevention of undernutrition through 

integrated services. These include nutrition education to improve maternal diets, nutrition during 

pregnancy, exclusive breastfeeding, and infant and young child feeding practices; diet quality and 

diversification through fortified or biofortified staple foods, specialized food products, and community 

gardens; and delivery of nutrition services such as micronutrient supplementation and community 

management of acute malnutrition. 

Vulnerable Children ($13 million) for the Displaced Children and Orphans Fund (DCOF). DCOF 

supports projects that strengthen the economic capacity of vulnerable families to protect and provide for 

the needs of their children, strengthen national child protection systems, and facilitate family reunification 

and social reintegration of children separated during armed conflict, including child soldiers, street 

children and institutionalized children. 

Creating an AIDS-free Generation

The President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), the largest effort by any nation to combat a 

single disease, continues to work towards achieving ambitious prevention, care, and treatment goals while 

strengthening health systems and emphasizing country ownership in order to build a long-term 

sustainable response to the epidemic and to create an AIDS-free generation. PEPFAR represents 

U.S. leadership in meeting the shared responsibility of all global partners to make smart investments to 

save lives, and under this Administration, unprecedented progress has been made in the fight against 

AIDS. In FY 2012, the United States directly supported life-saving treatment for nearly 5.1 million men, 

women and children worldwide, a three-fold increase (from 1.7 million in 2008) in only four years. 

Through increased programming in the prevention of mother-to-child transmission, PEPFAR supported 

antiretroviral drugs for nearly 750,000 pregnant women living with HIV, averting an estimated 230,000 

infant HIV infections in FY 2012 alone. In addition, in FY 2012 care services were provided to almost 

15 million people (including 4.5 million orphans and vulnerable children). 

Scientific advances and their successful implementation have brought the world to a tipping point in the 

fight against AIDS. PEPFAR will help countries reduce new HIV infections and decrease AIDS-related 

mortality, while simultaneously increasing the capacity of countries to sustain and support these efforts 

over time. 

Strong U.S. leadership along with a heightened commitment by other partners will allow us to seize the 

opportunity for significant progress toward the goal of an AIDS-free generation. PEPFAR is scaling-up 

combination HIV prevention and treatment interventions, working towards the elimination of new HIV 

infections among children by 2015; increasing coverage of HIV treatment to both reduce AIDS-related 

mortality and to enhance HIV prevention; increasing the number of males who are circumcised for HIV 

prevention; and increasing access to, and uptake of, HIV testing and counseling, condoms and other 

evidence-based, appropriately-targeted prevention interventions. In addition, PEPFAR platforms are 

being utilized by other U.S. Government global health programs under GHI to advance other priorities 

such as reducing maternal mortality rates and curbing malaria.

73
The GHP account is the largest source of funding for PEPFAR and this account is overseen and 

coordinated by the Department of State’s Office of the U.S. Global AIDS Coordinator. The request 

includes a total $6,000 million in GHP ($5,670 million GHP-State and $330 million GHP-USAID) for 

country-based HIV/AIDS activities; technical support, strategic information, and evaluation support for 

international partners; and oversight and management. PEPFAR implementation is a broad interagency 

effort that involves the Department of State, USAID, the Peace Corps, and the Departments of Health and 

Human Services, Defense, Commerce, and Labor, as well as local and international nongovernmental 

organizations, faith- and community-based organizations, private sector entities, and partner governments. 

Highlights:

Integrated HIV/AIDS Prevention, Care, and Treatment and Other Health Systems Programs ($3,944 

million including $3,708 million GHP-State and $236 million GHP-USAID): 

• $3,708 million of GHP-State will support ongoing implementation of current HIV/AIDS prevention, 

care, treatment and other health systems programs as well as the prioritization of combinations of 

activities based on sound scientific evidence that will have the maximum impact to push the rate of 

new infections downward dramatically and save more lives. Antiretroviral treatment (ART) as 

prevention, voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC), condom distribution, and Prevention of 

Mother-to-Child Transmission (PMTCT) - including the B-plus option of continuous ART for 

HIV-positive pregnant women - will continue to be instrumental in further turning the tide of global 

AIDS. These efforts and other complementary interventions, such as HIV testing and counseling and 

prevention programs for persons living with HIV and populations at high risk for infection continue 

to be core interventions for stemming the course of the epidemic.

 

FY 2014 funds will continue to be used for priority programs that address gender issues, including 

gender-based violence, and health systems strengthening (HSS), especially in nations with a severe 

shortage of healthcare workers. PEPFAR’s investments made in HSS are intended to develop the 

infrastructure and systems needed to achieve an AIDS-free generation, as well as to benefit the health 

of the population for years to come. 

As the established timeframes for Partnership Frameworks (PFs) begin to come to a close, the next 

phase of the PF process will be based on the principle of country ownership and will prioritize 

countries (including government, civil society, and the private sector) working to build the capacity to 

achieve joint goals and targets. In FY 2014 this transition framework will be an important part of 

country plans and the strategies for engaging with partner governments, and will move PEPFAR 

further from emergency assistance towards sustainability.

• $236 million GHP-USAID contributes to PEPFAR’s global fight against the HIV/AIDS epidemic by 

targeting funds to meet critical needs of USAID field programs and by providing technical leadership 

worldwide. This includes support for programs that work with orphans and vulnerable children 

affected by the epidemic. Funding supports centrally-driven initiatives that catalyze new 

interventions at the field level, translate research findings into programs, and stimulate scale-up of 

proven interventions. GHP-USAID field resources leverage larger contributions from multilateral, 

international, private, and partner country sources by providing essential technical assistance for 

health systems strengthening, sustainability, capacity building, and country ownership. In addition to 

country programs, USAID will also continue to support the development of advanced product leads 

including Tenofovir gel. USAID collaborates closely with the Office of the U.S. Global AIDS 

Coordinator and other U.S. Government agencies to ensure that activities funded with these resources 

complement and enhance efforts funded through the GHP-State account.

74
International Partnerships ($1,789 million including $1,695 million GHP-State and $94 million 

GHP-USAID) 

• $1,695 million GHP-State will be used for a $1.65 billion contribution to the Global Fund to Fight 

AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria and a $45 million contribution to UNAIDS. PEPFAR will continue 

to expand multilateral engagement with the goal of leveraging the work of multilateral partners to 

maximize the impact of country programs. 

• $94 million GHP-USAID will be used to support the Commodity Fund, HIV vaccine development 

through the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative (IAVI), and major research with worldwide impact 

including microbicides research activities. 

Oversight and Management ($187 million GHP-State) funding supports costs incurred by multiple 

U.S. Government agency headquarters including: supporting administrative and institutional costs; 

management of staff at headquarters and in the field; management and processing of cooperative 

agreements and contracts; and the administrative costs of the Office of the U.S. Global AIDS 

Coordinator. 

Technical Support, Strategic Information and Evaluation ($80 million GHP-State) funding supports 

central technical support and programmatic costs and strategic information systems that monitor program 

performance, track progress, and evaluate the effectiveness of interventions. PEPFAR aims to support 

the expansion of the evidence base around HIV interventions and broader health systems strengthening in 

order to support sustainable, country-led programs. While not a research organization, PEPFAR works 

with implementers, researchers, and academic organizations to help inform public health and clinical 

practice. Technical leadership and direct technical assistance activities (including scientific quality 

assurance) are supported for a variety of program activities, including: antiretroviral treatment, 

prevention (including sexual transmission, mother-to-child transmission, medical transmission, and 

testing and counseling), and care (including programs for orphans and vulnerable children and people 

living with or affected by HIV/AIDS), as well as cross-cutting efforts such as human capacity 

development, training for health care workers, and supply chain management.

Protecting Communities from Other Infectious Diseases 

While the GHI emphasizes two key areas where the U.S. Government can make a marked 

difference—saving lives of mothers and children and creating an AIDS-free 

generation—U.S. Government efforts will also continue to combat other infectious diseases from which 

millions of people die or could die each year including tuberculosis, neglected tropical diseases, and 

pandemic influenza. The Request includes $323 million GHP-USAID for programs to fight other 

infectious diseases.

Highlights: 

Tuberculosis (TB) ($191 million) funding for programs which address a disease that is the leading cause 

of death and debilitating illness for adults throughout much of the developing world. Globally, 1.4 

million people die annually from TB, and there are 8.8 million new cases of TB each year. Annually, 

there are approximately 500,000 cases of multi-drug resistant (MDR) TB, which are difficult to cure and 

are often deadly. USAID program efforts focus on early diagnosis and successful treatment of the 

disease to both cure individuals and prevent transmission to others. Funding priority is given to those 

countries that have the greatest burden of TB and MDR-TB. Country-level expansion and strengthening 

of the Stop TB Strategy will continue to be the focal point of USAID’s TB program, including increasing 

and strengthening human resources to support the delivery of priority health services such as Directly 

75
Observed Treatment, Short Course (DOTS) implementation, preventing and treating TB/HIV 

co-infection, and partnering with the private sector in DOTS. In particular, USAID will continue to 

accelerate activities to address MDR and extensively drug resistant TB, including the expansion of 

diagnosis and treatment, and infection control measures. USAID collaborates with PEPFAR, other 

U.S. Government agencies, and the Global Fund to integrate health services and strengthen delivery 

platforms to expand coverage of TB/HIV co-infection interventions. 

Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) ($85 million) More than 1 billion people worldwide suffer from 

one or more neglected tropical diseases (NTDs), which cause severe disability, including permanent 

blindness, and hinder growth, productivity, and cognitive development. USAID focuses the majority of 

its NTD support on scaling-up preventive drug treatments for seven of the most prevalent NTDs, 

including schistosomiasis, onchocerciasis, lymphatic filariasis, trachoma and three soil-transmitted 

helminthes. USAID programs will use an agency-tested and the World Health Organization 

(WHO)-approved integrated mass drug administration delivery strategy that will target affected 

communities, using drugs that have been proven safe and effective and can be delivered by trained 

non-health personnel. USAID centrally leverages the vast majority of the drugs through partnerships 

with several pharmaceutical companies, which donate close to a billion dollars worth of drugs each year. 

Expanding these programs to national scale will support acceleration of global efforts to eliminate 

lymphatic filariasis and blinding trachoma globally, and onchocerciasis in the Americas. USAID will 

continue to work closely with the WHO and global partners to create an international NTD training 

course and standardized monitoring and evaluation guidelines for NTD programs, and ensure the 

availability of quality pharmaceuticals.

Pandemic Influenza and Other Emerging Threats (PIOET) ($47 million) funding for programs that 

focus on mitigating the possibility that a highly virulent virus such as H5N1, H1N1, or another pathogen 

variant could develop into a pandemic. Nearly 75 percent of all new, emerging, or re-emerging diseases 

affecting humans at the beginning of the 21st century originated in animals (zoonotic diseases), 

underscoring the need for the development of comprehensive disease detection and response capacities 

that span the traditional domains of animal health, public health, ecology, and conservation. In 

particular, activities will expand surveillance to address the role of wildlife in the emergence and spread 

of new pathogens; enhance field epidemiological training of national partners; strengthen laboratory 

capability to address infectious disease threats; broaden ongoing efforts to prevent H5N1 transmission; 

and strengthen national capacities to prepare for the emergence and spread of a pandemic. 

76
Development Assistance

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Development Assistance 2,519,950 2,535,372 2,837,812 317,862

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175).

The FY 2014 Development Assistance (DA) request of $2,837.8 million supports the development 

principles outlined in the Presidential Policy Directive on Global Development (PPD-6), a policy 

framework that elevates global development as a key pillar of American power alongside defense and 

diplomacy. Of this amount, $330 million will be used to implement community-based development 

programs in accordance with the food aid reform, described further below. 

The FY 2014 request is designed to achieve the goals outlined in PPD-6 by supporting programs focused 

on sustainable development, economic growth, democratic governance, game-changing development 

innovations, sustainable systems for meeting basic human needs, and building resilience. Almost half of 

the funding from this account support the Presidential Initiatives for Global Climate Change and Feed the 

Future. The U.S. Government's programs funded by Development Assistance play a crucial part in the 

effort, along with the work of our allies, to eradicate extreme poverty in the next two decades. 

A key outcome of the PPD-6 is Partnerships for Growth (PfG), a coordinated whole-of-U.S.-Government 

approach to enhanced engagement with countries that have demonstrated a strong commitment to 

democratic governance and sustainable development. By supporting well-governed countries with 

potential for broad-based economic growth, U.S. programs will help to seed a new generation of 

emerging markets, which in turn are likely to become trade and investment partners with the 

United States. In FY 2014, the Department of State and the U.S. Agency for International Development 

(USAID) will continue working with the PfG counties - El Salvador, Ghana, Philippines, and Tanzania - 

to promote broad-based economic growth. In Ghana and Tanzania, economic growth funding is 

increased in FY 2014 in targeted areas related to the constraints-to-growth analyses.

In FY 2014, the DA request will also fund programs in the areas of food security, climate change, basic 

and higher education, economic growth, governing justly and democratically, as well as expanded efforts 

in the areas of innovation, science and technology, evaluation and empowering women and girls. 

Funding in these areas responds to longer-term challenges to human and economic security and supports 

the rise of capable new players who can help solve regional and global problems and help protect 

U.S. national security. The request also includes funding in support of the Administration's Asia 

Rebalance, which will intensify and expand USAID's environment, food security, governance, global 

climate change, and health programs in the region. It will enhance regional cooperation and build 

synergies among bilateral programs to address pressing transnational challenges vital to regional stability. 

DA-funded programs are coordinated with programs managed by the Millennium Challenge Corporation 

(MCC) and other international affairs agencies. As a mutually reinforcing array of foreign assistance 

activities, these programs advance and sustain overall U.S. development goals in targeted countries. 

Programs funded through this account represent the core contribution from the United States to 

international efforts working to achieve the Millennium Development Goals. In addition, programs 

support the efforts of host governments and their private sector and non-governmental partners to 

implement the systemic political and economic changes needed for sustainable development progress. 

77
Requests for increases in individual bilateral DA programs focus on PfG countries that demonstrate 

commitment to improving transparent, accountable, and responsible governance, where U.S. assistance is 

most likely to produce significant and sustainable development results. 

Highlights:

The Administration’s principal priorities for DA funding in FY 2014 include: 

• Feed the Future (FTF) ($917 million): Nearly 870 million people suffer from chronic hunger and 

more than 3.5 million children die from undernutrition every year. By 2050, the world's population 

is projected to increase to more than 9 billion, requiring up to a 60 percent increase in agricultural 

production. The President’s Feed the Future initiative, a USAID-led, whole-of-government effort, is 

the primary vehicle through which the U.S. Government is pursuing its global food security 

objectives. With a focus on smallholder farmers, particularly women, Feed the Future supports 

countries in developing their own agriculture sectors to generate opportunities for economic growth 

and trade, which help reduce poverty, hunger, and stunting. Agricultural growth is a highly effective 

way to fight poverty. Seventy-five percent of the world’s poor live in rural areas in developing 

countries, where most people’s livelihoods rely directly on agriculture, and studies show that growth 

in the agricultural sector has up to three times greater impact on poverty reduction than growth in 

other sectors. By helping create economic opportunities in developing countries, these collaborative 

food security efforts generate economic growth and promote global stability, which creates a healthier 

and more prosperous world. FTF is also focused on helping to prevent food crises. The FY 2014 

request for FTF will fund the fifth year of this Presidential initiative. 

The FY 2014 FTF request allocates resources to countries based on clear criteria to measure need and 

opportunity. Since the inception of FTF in 2010, agriculture programs have been phased out in 23 

countries where these conditions were not met. FTF investments address key constraints along the 

entire value chain - from bringing to scale innovative technologies that sustainably intensify on-farm 

productivity, to improving crop storage and handling, to increasing market access. FTF also fosters 

improvements in government policies that favor market-based agriculture-led economic growth. 

Programs are integrated in order to capitalize on the synergies between agriculture, health, nutrition, 

water, and climate change. In crisis, conflict, and post-conflict stabilization settings, programs 

contribute to sustainably reducing hunger, improving nutrition, and building resilience among 

vulnerable populations. Funding promotes greater private sector investment in agriculture, connects 

smallholders to markets, and builds the capacity of vulnerable and chronically food insecure 

households to participate in these economic activities. Funding also aims to reduce long-term 

vulnerability to food insecurity, specifically in the Horn of Africa and the Sahel.

This request supports the President’s G-8 commitment to the New Alliance for Food Security and 

Nutrition, which supports the commitments of Africa’s leadership to drive effective policies; 

encourages greater local and international private sector investment in agricultural development; and 

acts to bring agricultural innovations to scale, support effective finance, mitigate risk, and improve 

nutrition. Specifically, funding supports key technologies, such as improved seeds, and the 

preparation and financing of bankable agricultural infrastructure projects through a new Fast Track 

Facility for Agricultural Infrastructure. 

• Global Climate Change (GCC) ($317 million): Global climate change threatens the livelihoods of 

millions in developing countries, and if not addressed will negate the results of many development 

efforts. The poor in developing countries are often the earliest and hardest hit by climate change, as 

they are heavily dependent on climate sensitive economic activities such as agriculture, fisheries, 

78
forestry, and tourism, and they lack the capacity to cope with economic or environmental shocks. 

Projected climate change impacts will reduce agricultural productivity, negatively impact fisheries, 

and undermine public health. Additionally, climate change poses national security challenges, 

especially from the destabilizing impact it can have on economies and governance. Strategic 

investments will help vulnerable populations adapt to the impacts of climate change and reduce net 

greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. 

Funding will support programs in three pillar areas: adaptation, clean energy, and sustainable 

landscapes. Adaptation programs will assist countries to develop and implement effective strategies 

for reducing the impact of global climate change on vulnerable populations and for increasing those 

populations' resilience. Adaptation programs will focus on least-developed countries, 

glacier-dependent nations, and small island developing nations. Clean energy programs will include 

support for renewable energy, policy sector reform, increased efficiency, emissions inventories, and 

actions to reduce long-term emission trends in energy, industry, transportation, and buildings. Clean 

energy programs focus on major emerging economies and potentially large emitters by Enhancing 

Capacity for Low Emission Development Strategies (EC-LEDS). 

Sustainable landscapes programs, focused primarily in countries with globally important forests, will 

reduce GHG emissions by helping countries understand the drivers of deforestation and degraded 

lands. Sustainable landscapes programs develop and implement plans to address reducing emissions 

from land use under the EC-LEDS program and build capacity to measure and monitor GHG 

emissions from forests, wetlands, and other carbon-rich landscapes. The programs also promote 

policies and incentives that reward sustainable land use practices, and build capacity and enhance 

rights of indigenous communities and other stewards to participate in and benefit from carbon 

finance. 

• Education ($315 million): Education is foundational to human development. It is critical to 

promoting long-term, broad-based economic growth, reducing poverty and inequality, improving 

health, and promoting participatory democracy. However, around 61 million children of primary 

school age are still without access to basic educational opportunities. Over half of these 

out-of-school children live in conflict-affected and crisis contexts. To compound matters, recent 

studies show that for many students in low-income countries, very little learning actually occurs in 

the classroom. As they grow older, an increasing number of young people in developing countries 

find themselves without relevant knowledge and skills and are unable to fully participate in and 

contribute to economic development. 

The current scale of youth underemployment and unemployment is a matter of worldwide concern. 

An estimated 75 million young people worldwide are unemployed, and more than a billion jobs must 

be created in order to accommodate new workers and reduce unemployment. Yet job creation 

requires a population that is educated, informed, and skilled. To overcome all of these challenges, 

USAID’s Education Strategy addresses learning across the education spectrum, including basic 

education, higher education, and workforce development. The majority of education funding is for 

basic education, with a primary focus on reading acquisition in primary grades to achieve the goal of 

improving reading skills for 100 million children by 2015. The Strategy also prioritizes increased 

equitable access to basic educational services for 15 million learners by 2015 in conflict or crisis 

contexts. Investments in workforce development and tertiary education that increase national 

capacity to support country development goals by 2015 are also critical. 

FY 2014 resources support the implementation of education programs midway through the Strategy 

period. These programs are based on interventions that aim to measurably improve student learning 

79
outcomes, and that promote access and equity, relevance to national development, systemic reform, 

and accountability for results. This will be a crucial time to help take successful programs to greater 

scale as well as to make any shifts necessary to improve outcomes. 

• Economic Growth ($449.2 million, not including FTF and GCC funding): Economic growth is 

essential to reducing the many dimensions of extreme poverty, unlocking the full potential of 

individuals and communities, and enabling governments to provide basic public services effectively. 

The quality of economic growth matters as much as how it is generated. To be sustainable, growth 

must be widely shared; inclusive of all ethnic groups, women, and other marginalized groups; and 

compatible with the need to both reduce climate change impacts and manage natural and 

environmental resources responsibly. Economic growth programs will help countries develop the 

policies and practices they need to support rapid and sustainable economic growth. Economic 

policies, regulations, and approaches also affect countries’ ability to meet other development 

objectives. Funding will support programs that work with countries to improve the enabling 

environment for private investment, entrepreneurship, and broad-based economic growth by 

addressing issues such as property rights, business registration, administrative “red tape,” 

well-regulated competition, trade policies and trade capacity, and access to credit. 

• Governing Justly and Democratically ($351.8 million): Democracy, human rights, and 

governance are inseparable from other development goals. Without capable, transparent, accessible, 

and accountable public institutions, economic growth, broad-based opportunity, and key public 

services cannot be sustained. At the same time, citizens who enjoy access to services but do not live 

in a democratic society cannot realize the freedom and opportunity. U.S. assistance will support 

democracy, human rights, and governance to consolidate democratic institutions, make governments 

more effective and responsive to their populations, and expand the number of countries that respect 

human rights and act responsibly in the international system. The focus of DA interventions in this 

area will be on new and fragile democracies, as well as on those that have committed through sound 

policies and practice to build effective, transparent, and accountable governments, particularly in 

sub-Saharan Africa, Asia, and Latin America, to help ensure that they are able to deliver both political 

and socioeconomic benefits to their citizens. Programs will include efforts to increase political 

competition; strengthen civil society’s role in political, economic, and social life; support the free 

flow of information; promote government that is effective and legitimate; strengthen the rule of law; 

and advance anti-corruption measures. Programming will pursue specific goals, including (1) 

increasing the ability of government officials, law professionals, non-governmental organization 

affiliates, journalists, election observers, and citizens to strengthen the effectiveness, accountability, 

and participatory nature of democratic institutions within new and fragile democracies; (2) 

strengthening domestic human rights organizations, supporting public advocacy campaigns on human 

rights, and training domestic election observers in order to foster respect for human rights, increase 

citizens’ political participation, and expand political competition in closed societies; and (3) 

promoting stability, reform, and recovery to lay the foundations for democratic governance in conflict 

and failed states.

• USAID Forward Initiatives ($173.1 million): USAID Forward is a coordinated set of initiatives 

and reforms aimed at transforming USAID into a fully modern development enterprise, as called for 

in the PPD-6 and the Quadrennial Diplomacy and Development Review (QDDR). Funding will 

support initiatives on innovation, science and technology, and evaluation. The Development 

Innovation Ventures (DIV) program borrows from the private venture-capital model to invest 

resources in innovative high-risk, high-return development projects. DIV has the potential to 

produce breakthroughs that can serve as best practices in development, thereby transforming not just 

USAID’s program effectiveness but that of development agencies and developing country 

governments around the world. As well, the Office of Science and Technology (S&T) will leverage 

80
the power of research and development as envisioned in the PPD-6. S&T will engage universities 

and mobilize the global science and technology community for development results, including in 

developing countries, and sponsor revolutionary, multi-disciplinary applied research in order to 

increase global understanding of complex development issues and accelerate science and 

technology-based solutions. DA funds will also expand access to mobile banking technology, which 

has the potential to bring low-cost financial services and cashless transactions to millions of people, 

small businesses, and microenterprises. Funding will support Private Sector Alliances and Global 

Development Alliances, which can leverage additional outside resources and improve the 

sustainability of development interventions by attracting private-sector, market-driven resources for 

the long term. Science and technology funding supports a series of Grand Challenges for 

Development, as well as partnerships between American scientists and those in developing countries, 

and other efforts to bring the power of science to bear on major development problems. Central 

evaluation funds support the rebuilding of USAID’s capacity for performance monitoring and 

rigorous, relevant evaluation, including impact evaluations that directly measure the effectiveness of 

development interventions. 

• Gender ($19 million): To achieve successful outcomes for U.S. foreign policy priorities, including 

stability, peace, and development, the FY 2014 foreign assistance budget request supports 

U.S. promotion of gender equality and advancement of the political, economic, social, and cultural 

status of women and girls. The Department of State and USAID are systematically applying the new 

gender equality policy in all foreign assistance programming, and implementing commitments under 

the Women Peace and Security (WPS) National Action Plan and the U.S. Strategy to Prevent and 

Respond to Gender-Based Violence (GBV) Globally. USAID is programming DA funds for 

activities that promote women’s leadership, rights, and empowerment, as well as specific objectives 

related to WPS and women’s inclusion in peace-building. Funding will also be used to aid Missions 

in integrating gender equality across their portfolios. 

Food Aid Reform: The FY 2014 Food Aid Reform will ensure that the U.S. Government can respond 

most effectively to humanitarian crises and chronic food insecurity within current budget constraints, 

while reaching more people in need. It includes a shift of funding previously requested in P.L. 480 Title 

II to three other assistance accounts: International Disaster Assistance (IDA) for emergency food 

response; Development Assistance (DA) for the Community Development and Resilience Fund (CDRF) 

to address chronic food insecurity in areas of recurrent crises; and a new Emergency Food Assistance 

Contingency Fund. The CRDF will be composed of $330 million, replacing Title II non-emergency 

resources, including $80 million in DA from the Bureau for Food Security resources and $250 million in 

additional DA, to be implemented by partners that that receive Title II funding. These jointly-funded 

CDRF programs will be managed by USAID’s Office of Food for Peace and are a critical component of 

food security, strengthening the ability to address chronic poverty, build resilience, and help prevent food 

crises. The goal is to make food aid more timely and cost-effective and to improve program efficiencies 

and performance by shifting resources to programs that will allow the use of the right tool at the right 

time for responding to emergencies and chronic food insecurity. The range of tools and programs 

include interventions such as local and regional purchase, purchase of U.S. agricultural commodities and 

products, cash vouchers and transfers, and cash for work programs. Provided that the proposed food aid 

reforms are enacted and all the funding previously requested in P.L. 480 Title II is appropriated as 

described above, at least fifty-five percent of the requested (and appropriated) IDA funding of $1,416 

million for emergency food assistance programs administered by USAID’s Office of Food for Peace, will 

be used for the purchase and transport of agricultural commodities produced in the United States. The 

reform will facilitate robust emergency and development programming. (The Budget also shifts $25 

million of the efficiency savings to the Department of Transportation’s Maritime Administration for 

additional targeted operating subsidies for militarily-useful vessels and incentives to facilitate the 

retention of mariners.) 

81
International Disaster Assistance

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

International Disaster Assistance 1,095,000 980,049 2,045,000 950,000

Enduring 825,000 830,049 2,045,000 1,220,000

Overseas Contingency Operations2 270,000 150,000 - -270,000

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175).

2/ The FY 2012 OCO Actual level reflects the transfer of $120 million from the Pakistan Counterinsurgency Capability Fund to the 

International Disaster Assistance account.

The FY 2014 International Disaster Assistance (IDA) request of $2,045 million will provide funds to save 

lives, reduce suffering, and mitigate and prepare for natural and complex emergencies overseas through 

food assistance, disaster relief, rehabilitation, and reconstruction assistance, including that for transition to 

development assistance programs, and through disaster preparedness/risk reduction activities. This 

amount includes $1,416 million for emergency food assistance. The IDA request will enable the 

U.S. Government to meet humanitarian needs quickly and support mitigation and preparedness programs. 

The U.S. Agency for International Development’s (USAID’s) Office of Foreign Disaster Assistance will 

administer $629 million to respond to natural disasters, civil strife, global economic downturns, food 

insecurity, and prolonged displacement of populations that continue to hinder the advancement of 

development and stability. IDA funds benefit disaster- and conflict-affected individuals and internally 

displaced persons. By reducing the impact of disasters, these programs alleviate suffering and save lives. 

IDA programs target the most vulnerable populations that are affected by the shock of disasters including 

those that are internally displaced. This funding level will allow the United States to maintain a 

reasonable level of resources to cover continuing complex emergencies, disaster risk reduction, and also 

maintains sufficient resources to respond to new disasters, including increased funding for the local and 

regional purchase of emergency food assistance. 

In addition, USAID is responsible for certain necessary recurring and non-recurring costs for providing 

U.S. disaster assistance under the Compact of Free Association between the United States and the 

Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI) and the Federated States of Micronesia (FSM). Recurring costs 

are approximately $1 million annually, funded from IDA. These costs include pre-positioning of 

emergency relief supplies, full-time staff based in the region to coordinate with government officials in 

both FSM and RMI, and agreements with disaster assistance implementing partners. These funds are in 

addition to the $1 million in Development Assistance provided through USAID's Asia Bureau.

Food Aid Reform: The FY 2014 Food Aid Reform will ensure that the U.S. Government can respond 

most effectively to humanitarian crises and chronic food insecurity within current budget constraints, 

while reaching more people in need. It includes a shift of funding previously requested in P.L. 480 Title 

II to three other assistance accounts: International Disaster Assistance (IDA) for emergency food 

response; Development Assistance (DA) for the Community Development and Resilience Fund (CDRF) 

to address chronic food insecurity in areas of recurrent crises; and a new Emergency Food Assistance 

Contingency Fund. The CRDF will be composed of $330 million, replacing Title II non-emergency 

resources, including $80 million in DA from the Bureau for Food Security resources and $250 million in 

additional DA, to be implemented by partners that receive Title II funding. These jointly-funded CDRF 

82
programs will be managed by USAID’s Office of Food for Peace and are a critical component of food

security, strengthening the ability to address chronic poverty, build resilience, and help prevent food 

crises. The goal is to make food aid more timely and cost-effective and to improve program efficiencies 

and performance by shifting resources to programs that will allow the use of the right tool at the right 

time for responding to emergencies and chronic food insecurity. The range of tools and programs 

include interventions such as local and regional purchase, purchase of U.S. agricultural commodities and 

products, cash vouchers and transfers, and cash for work programs. Provided that the proposed food aid 

reforms are enacted and all the funding previously requested in P.L. 480 Title II is appropriated as 

described above, at least fifty-five percent of the requested (and appropriated) IDA funding of $1,416 

million for emergency food assistance programs administered by USAID’s Office of Food for Peace, will 

be used for the purchase and transport of agricultural commodities produced in the United States. The 

reform will facilitate robust emergency and development programming. (The Budget also shifts $25 

million of the efficiency savings to the Department of Transportation’s Maritime Administration for 

additional targeted operating subsidies for militarily-useful vessels and incentives to facilitate the 

retention of mariners.) 

The request includes authority for USAID’s Office of Food for Peace to cover administrative costs that 

were available under P.L. 480 Title II. These authorities will facilitate the purchase and delivery of 

U.S. commodities under IDA. 

83
Emergency Food Assistance Contingency Fund

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Emergency Food Assistance Contingency Fund - - 75,000 75,000

The Emergency Food Assistance Contingency Fund (EFAC) of $75 million will enable the President to 

provide emergency food assistance for unexpected and urgent food needs worldwide. Following a 

Presidential determination, funds released from EFAC will be managed by USAID’s Office of Food for 

Peace and will have the same flexibility as the International Disaster Assistance account to provide timely 

and cost-effective food emergency responses through interventions such as local and regional 

procurement of food, cash transfers or vouchers to facilitate access to food, or the purchase and shipment 

of U.S. commodities as appropriate. 

The funding is a reallocation from funding previously requested for P.L. 480 Title II. 

Food Aid Reform: The FY 2014 Food Aid Reform will ensure that the U.S. Government can respond 

most effectively to humanitarian crises and chronic food insecurity within current budget constraints, 

while reaching more people in need. It includes a shift of funding previously requested in P.L. 480 Title 

II to three other assistance accounts: International Disaster Assistance (IDA) for emergency food 

response; Development Assistance (DA) for the Community Development and Resilience Fund (CDRF) 

to address chronic food insecurity in areas of recurrent crises; and a new Emergency Food Assistance 

Contingency Fund. The CRDF will be composed of $330 million, replacing Title II non-emergency 

resources, including $80 million in DA from the Bureau for Food Security resources and $250 million in 

additional DA, to be implemented by partners that receive Title II funding. These jointly-funded CDRF 

programs will be managed by USAID’s Office of Food for Peace and are a critical component of food 

security, strengthening the ability to address chronic poverty, build resilience, and help prevent food 

crises. The goal is to make food aid more timely and cost-effective and to improve program efficiencies 

and performance by shifting resources to programs that will allow the use of the right tool at the right 

time for responding to emergencies and chronic food insecurity. The range of tools and programs 

include interventions such as local and regional purchase, purchase of U.S. agricultural commodities and 

products, cash vouchers and transfers, and cash for work programs. Provided that the proposed food aid 

reforms are enacted and all the funding previously requested in P.L. 480 Title II is appropriated as 

described above, at least fifty-five percent of the requested (and appropriated) IDA funding of $1,416 

million for emergency food assistance programs administered by USAID’s Office of Food for Peace, will 

be used for the purchase and transport of agricultural commodities produced in the United States. The 

reform will facilitate robust emergency and development programming. (The Budget also shifts $25 

million of the efficiency savings to the Department of Transportation’s Maritime Administration for 

additional targeted operating subsidies for militarily-useful vessels and incentives to facilitate the 

retention of mariners.)

84
Transition Initiatives

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Transition Initiatives 93,695 57,002 57,600 -36,095

Enduring 50,141 50,448 57,600 7,459

Overseas Contingency Operations2 43,554 6,554 - -43,554

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175).

2/ The FY 2012 OCO Actual level reflects the transfer of $37 million from the International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement account to 

the Transition Initiatives account.

The FY 2014 request of $57.6 million for the Transition Initiatives (TI) account will address opportunities 

and challenges facing conflict-prone countries and those countries making the transition from the initial 

crisis stage of a complex emergency to sustainable development and democracy. 

TI funds will support fast, flexible, short-term assistance to advance peace and democracy in countries 

that are important to U.S. foreign policy. Examples of assistance include promoting responsiveness of 

central governments to local needs, civic participation programs, media programs raising awareness of 

national issues, addressing underlying causes of instability, and conflict resolution measures. 

85
Complex Crises Fund

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Complex Crises Fund 50,000 40,061 40,000 -10,000

Enduring 10,000 10,061 40,000 30,000

Overseas Contingency Operations2 40,000 30,000 - -40,000

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175).

2/ The FY 2012 OCO Actual level reflects the transfer of $10 million from the Pakistan Counterinsurgency Capability Fund to the Complex 

Crises Fund.

The FY 2014 request of $40 million for the Complex Crises Fund (CCF) will be used to support activities 

to prevent or respond to emerging or unforeseen crises. The CCF was created in FY 2010 to regularize 

contingency funding previously received through transfers from the Department of Defense under Section 

1207 authority that has since expired. Managed by USAID, funds are targeted to countries or regions 

that demonstrate a high or escalating risk of conflict or instability, or present an unanticipated opportunity 

for progress in a newly emerging or fragile democracy. Projects aim to address and prevent root causes 

of conflict and instability through a whole-of-government approach and include host government 

participation, as well as other partner resources. In the past year, CCF funds have provided critical 

support for programs in Kenya, Jordan, Burma, Nepal, and the Democratic Republic of Congo. The 

FY 2014 request includes the authority to transfer up to $7 million to the Department of State’s Conflict 

and Stabilization Operations account. 

86
Development Credit Authority

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Development Credit Authority - Subsidy [40,000] [40,000] [40,000] [0]

Development Credit Authority - Administrative 

Expenses

8,300 8,351 8,200 -100

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175).

The FY 2014 request includes $40 million in Development Credit Authority (DCA) transfer authority to 

provide loan guarantees in all regions and sectors targeted by the U.S. Agency for International 

Development (USAID), and $8.2 million for DCA administrative expenses. DCA transfer authority 

allows field missions to transfer funds from USAID appropriation accounts to the DCA program account 

to finance the subsidy cost of DCA partial credit guarantees. These projects allow credit to be used as a 

flexible tool for a wide range of development purposes and can help to promote broad-based economic 

growth in developing and transitional economies. DCA guarantees augment grant assistance by 

mobilizing private capital for sustainable development projects. In coordination with related technical 

assistance, DCA supports host countries in the financing of their own development. 

To date, DCA has been used to mobilize more than $2.7 billion in local private financing at a budget cost 

of $118 million. DCA transfer authority has enabled 70 USAID missions to enter into over 300 

guarantee agreements in virtually every development sector. USAID has incurred only $9.6 million in 

default claims to date for all of the guarantees made under DCA, which corresponds to an overall default 

rate of 1.7 percent. DCA projects have proven to be very effective in channeling resources to 

microenterprises, small-and medium-scale businesses, farmers, healthcare providers, and certain 

infrastructure sectors. In 2012, working directly with our partners and USAID missions, DCA completed 

47 transactions in 23 countries that will leverage up to $524 million in private capital for critical 

investments in agriculture, health, education, municipal infrastructure, water, energy (especially solar 

power), and other sectors. In support of USAID Forward and other Agency-wide priorities, the DCA 

portfolio in Sub-Saharan Africa continues to grow. In FY 2013, the Africa portfolio will represent at 

least 50 percent of the value of all DCA transactions.

In FY 2014, DCA will continue to use guarantees to help banks and microfinance institutions access 

affordable, long-term capital for small and medium enterprise lending at longer tenors, particularly in 

sub-Saharan Africa. DCA will also continue to take advantage of more developed municipal capacity 

and capital markets to expand successful sub-sovereign financing models developed in Asia and Eastern 

Europe. In addition, DCA will develop new partnerships with Diaspora groups, leasing companies, 

pension funds, and other guarantors, both public and private. Lastly, DCA loan guarantees will be used 

to increase investments in climate change activities including sustainable forestry, adaptation, and 

mitigation.

The request for FY 2014 increases the maximum guaranteed portfolio level to $2 billion in order to both 

support anticipated growth in the program, as well as to enable DCA to assume smaller, yet catalytic, 

positions in larger portfolios. In accordance with the Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990 (2 U.S.C. sec. 

661), the request for credit administrative expenses will fund the total cost of development, 

implementation, and financial management of the DCA program, as well as the continued administration 

of USAID’s legacy and other credit portfolios, which amount to more than $17 billion. 

87
Economic Support Fund

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Economic Support Fund 6,146,707 5,673,923 5,458,254 -688,453

Enduring 2,994,745 2,912,461 4,076,054 1,081,309

Overseas Contingency Operations2, 3 3,151,962 2,761,462 1,382,200 -1,769,762

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175).

2/ The FY 2012 OCO Actual level reflects the transfer of $105 million from the Pakistan Counterinsurgency Capability Fund and $285.5 

million from the International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement account to the Economic Support Fund.

3/ The FY 2012 OCO Actual level reflects the transfer of $10 million from the Economic Support Fund to the International Narcotics Control 

and Law Enforcement account. 

The FY 2014 Economic Support Fund (ESF) enduring request of $4,152.1 million advances U.S. interests 

by helping countries meet short- and long-term political, economic, and security needs. These needs are 

addressed through a range of activities, including countering terrorism and extremist ideology; increasing 

the role of the private sector in the economy; assisting in the development of effective, accessible, 

independent legal systems; supporting transparent and accountable governance; and empowering citizens. 

Programs funded through this account are critical to U.S. national security because they help to prevent 

wars and contain conflicts, and foster economic prosperity at home by opening markets overseas, 

promoting U.S. exports, and helping countries transition to developed economies. 

The FY 2014 budget normalizes foreign assistance for Europe, Eurasia, and Central Asia by requesting 

funding for programs formerly supported through the Assistance for Europe, Eurasia and Central Asia 

account in the ESF account as well as in the Global Health Programs and International Narcotics Control 

and Law Enforcement accounts.

Highlights:

Sub-Saharan Africa ($564 million): The FY 2014 request includes funding for programs that 

strengthen democratic institutions and support conflict mitigation and reconciliation, basic education, and 

economic growth in key African countries, including: 

• South Sudan ($280.5 million): In the coming decade, significant donor assistance in developing 

governmental and civil society capacity and economic infrastructure will help the South Sudanese 

advance towards a lasting democratic future. U.S. assistance will accelerate progress in governance, 

rule of law, conflict mitigation, civil society building, agriculture, infrastructure, health, and basic 

education.

• Liberia ($106 million): The FY 2014 request will support Liberia's efforts to consolidate progress 

made over the past few years and move more clearly from post-crisis activities into sustainable 

assistance programs as the United Nations Mission in Liberia draws down and the Liberian 

government takes on greater responsibilities to solidify confidence in public governance. Funding 

will also be used to sustain health, water, governance, education, and agriculture programs, and 

expand infrastructure programs, especially in the energy sector.

88
• Democratic Republic of the Congo ($59.9 million): The FY 2014 request for the Democratic 

Republic of the Congo will support conflict mitigation, the prevention and treatment of sexual and 

gender-based violence, basic education, agriculture, and capacity building for the legislature, justice, 

and media sectors. Funds will also be used for rule of law and civil protection programs to support 

the development of democratic institutions that provide basic needs and services for citizens.

• Somalia ($49.4 million): The end of the political transition in 2012 and the formal recognition of 

the Government of Somalia in January 2013 represent the beginning of a new political phase. The 

FY 2014 request will assist Somalis in reestablishing viable governance institutions, which are 

essential to alleviating humanitarian suffering in the broader Horn of Africa. Increased resources 

will focus on stabilization and reconciliation efforts; nascent political party development; civil society 

efforts to promote peace, good governance, and consensus-building; and programs in education, 

livelihoods, and economic growth. 

• Zimbabwe ($25.1 million): The FY 2014 request will expand efforts to improve governance in 

Zimbabwe by placing greater emphasis on strengthening Parliament, local governments, and 

executive branch structures. Support for Zimbabwe assumes progress in reform of the political 

system under a transitional or new government that comes to power through free, fair, and transparent 

elections. Efforts will also focus on improving food security. 

• Sudan ($10.7 million): Peace and stability in Sudan remain critical objectives of the United States, 

both in the context of resolving outstanding and post-Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) issues, 

as well as improving conditions in Darfur and seeking an end to the conflict there. In the Three 

Areas, Darfur, and other marginalized areas, efforts will focus on peacebuilding and conflict 

mitigation. 

 

East Asia and the Pacific ($93.7 million): The FY 2014 request includes funding to support the 

Administration’s strategic rebalance to the Asia-Pacific region and to strengthen regional economic 

integration and trade that will support economic growth in the United States, while advancing democratic 

development in the region. Highlights include: 

• Burma ($51.2 million): The FY 2014 request supports a forward-leaning U.S. policy that builds on 

Burma’s political and economic reform agenda to promote national reconciliation, democracy, human 

rights, and the rule of law; foster economic opportunity; increase food security; and meet other basic 

human needs to enable Burma's population to contribute to and sustain reforms. By focusing on 

inclusivity, transparency, accountability, and local empowerment, programs strengthen civil society 

and promote democratic culture and practices. ESF-funded programs also provide crisis assistance 

and recovery programs to Burmese refugees and internally displaced persons. 

• East Asia and Pacific Regional ($26 million): The FY 2014 request supports partnerships with key 

regional multilateral organizations such as the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Forum, the 

Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), the ASEAN Regional Forum, and the Lower 

Mekong Initiative (LMI). The Department of State leverages cooperation within these multilateral 

fora to strengthen U.S. engagement at the annual East Asia Summit, the region’s preeminent forum to 

discuss political and strategic issues. EAP Regional programs support these important multilateral 

institutions to help maintain momentum for key economic priorities, encourage regional standards 

that more closely align governments with the Unites States, and support regional connectivity and 

integration. These programs will also fulfill the President's commitments to the Enhanced Economic 

Engagement Initiative (E3) and the U.S.-Asia Pacific Comprehensive Partnership for a Sustainable 

Energy Future, announced by President Obama in November 2012 at the East Asia Summit. 

89
• Regional Development Mission for Asia ($7 million): The FY 2014 request supports the LMI 

through capacity building of LMI countries on sound and sustainable environmental management, 

including management of increasingly variable shared water resources, and a higher education 

partnership to strengthen educational cooperation in the Lower Mekong region. 

Europe and Eurasia ($352.9 million): The FY 2014 ESF request for this region is focused on 

supporting U.S. efforts to stabilize and transition Southeastern Europe and the independent states of the 

former Soviet Union to become stable, pluralistic, and prosperous countries. Highlights include: 

• Ukraine ($54 million): U.S. assistance aims to promote the development of a democratic, 

prosperous, and secure Ukraine, fully integrated into the Euro-Atlantic community as it struggles to 

overcome the effects of the global financial crisis and worsening backsliding on democratic reform. 

Funding will strengthen democratic institutions and processes, and accountable governance; support 

civil society, independent media, judicial reform, and anti-corruption efforts; improve conditions for 

investment and economic growth; improve energy security; and help bring the damaged Chornobyl 

nuclear facility to an environmentally safe and stable condition and properly store its nuclear waste. 

• Georgia ($43 million): The funding requested in FY 2014 will focus on encouraging Georgia’s 

democratization and developing its free-market economy. U.S. programs will help strengthen 

institutional checks and balances and the rule of law; develop a more vibrant civil society; promote 

political pluralism; bolster independent media and public access to information; increase energy 

security; promote the reforms necessary to foster economic development and attract foreign 

investment; and further social sector development. 

• Kosovo ($41 million): Funding will help still-nascent institutions in Kosovo adjust to the challenges 

of effective governance; further the development of the justice sector; drive private sector-led 

economic growth through policy reform and support to key sectors; strengthen democratic 

institutions; develop future leaders; build the capacity of civil society and independent media to 

address corruption and promote government accountability; and mitigate conflict by building 

tolerance among all of Kosovo’s diverse communities.

• Bosnia and Herzegovina ($27.7 million): Funding will help Bosnia and Herzegovina regain 

momentum toward Euro-Atlantic integration and improve its uneven progress on reform. 

U.S. assistance will support the development of state-level institutions; strengthen the rule of law; 

foster a sound financial and regulatory environment to promote investment; increase the 

competitiveness of small and medium enterprises in targeted sectors; improve governance and 

delivery of justice at the sub-state level; build the capacity of local government and civil society; and 

address ethnic tensions.

• Europe and Eurasia Regional ($68.3 million): Resources will support initiatives to further 

transition goals in the region by promoting cross-border economic and energy linkages; advancing 

economic integration across the Balkans; supporting lower emissions development pathways for the 

region; promoting civil society development and networks; fostering professional investigative 

journalism; and providing targeted humanitarian assistance.

Near East ($1,203.4 million): The FY 2014 request includes funding to support democratic reform and 

political institution building in the Middle East and North Africa and to help create economic 

opportunities for youth in the region. Funding will continue for programs that advance U.S. national 

security interests.

90
• West Bank and Gaza ($370 million): The FY 2014 request will help advance a negotiated, 

two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict by working with the Palestinian Authority (PA) to 

build the institutions of a future Palestinian state and deliver services to the Palestinian people. It 

will also provide much needed humanitarian relief to Palestinians living in Gaza by providing 

assistance through the UN and NGOs as a counterweight to Hamas. U.S. Government assistance 

creates an atmosphere that supports negotiations, encourages broad-based economic growth, 

promotes democratic governance, and improves the everyday lives of Palestinians, thereby 

contributing to the overall stability and security of the region. 

• Jordan ($360 million): The FY 2014 request supports the Government of Jordan’s capacity to 

advance its political, economic, and social reform agendas. Programs will support these reforms as 

well as encourage competitiveness and job creation, combat poverty, support workforce development, 

enhance government accountability, bolster civil society, and increase public participation in political 

processes. Assistance will also support improvements in basic education and healthcare. Funds will 

also provide balance of payments support to the Government of Jordan to enhance economic stability. 

• Egypt ($250 million): The FY 2014 request will continue our longstanding commitment to Egypt 

by providing critical assistance as the country continues its historic democratic transition. 

U.S. assistance programs will seek to support a successful transition to democracy while assisting the 

Egyptian Government to address obstacles to sustainable economic growth and recovery. In 

partnership with the Egyptian Government, U.S. assistance will help Egypt address its economic 

challenges; support the development of democratic institutions; encourage broad-based private-sector 

growth and job creation through a focus on small and medium enterprises, entrepreneurship, 

workforce development, trade promotion, and the development of the tourism and agricultural 

sectors; promote government accountability, transparency, and human rights; support improvements 

in education; and help improve the quality of health services. The request also includes continued 

funding for the Egyptian-American Enterprise Fund that will invest in promising Egyptian businesses 

and stimulate job creation. 

• Lebanon ($70 million): The FY 2014 request supports Lebanese institutions that advance internal 

and regional stability, combat the influence of extremists, and promote transparency and economic 

growth. These goals support a peaceful Middle East and a direct enhancement of U.S. national 

security. The request includes assistance to promote Lebanon’s sovereignty and stability by 

strengthening credible and capable public institutions, improve the quality of life for ordinary 

Lebanese, and promote economic prosperity across sectarian lines. The United States continues to 

closely monitor developments in Lebanon, in particular the Government of Lebanon's adherence to 

international obligations and the rule of law. The program continues to emphasize the funding of 

non-governmental organizations.

• Yemen ($45 million): The FY 2014 request will support Yemen’s ongoing political transition and 

constitutional reform, as well as women and youth, advancing U.S. interests by promoting good 

governance, democratic reform, and regional stability. The request will also continue to support 

Yemen’s critical humanitarian and economic development needs through community livelihood 

programs, particularly for at-risk populations, and will fund key agriculture programs in a sector that 

historically accounts for roughly one half of Yemen’s employment. 

• Tunisia ($30 million): Contributing to Tunisia’s democratic and economic evolution advances 

U.S. interests in a number of ways by helping to build a locally legitimate example of responsive and 

accountable governance, economic prosperity, and regional stability. The FY 2014 request funds 

91
activities that bolster governance and civic engagement; continue USAID’s program to develop 

Tunisia’s information and communications technology sector; invest in education; expand access to 

capital for Tunisian small- and medium-enterprises; and provide technical assistance on financial 

regulation reform activities. The FY 2014 request also includes $20 million in support of the 

Tunisian-American Enterprise Fund. 

• Near East Regional Democracy ($30 million): The FY 2014 request will be used to expand and 

enhance existing Near East Regional Democracy-funded activities aimed at increasing the capacity of 

citizens and civil society in the region to promote internationally recognized democratic and human 

rights principles. The request includes $7 million to support cutting edge tools and requisite training 

that promote Internet Freedom and enhance the safe, effective use of communication technologies. 

As specific opportunities arise or new openings occur, additional focus areas may emerge that are in 

line with U.S. Government policy in the region. 

• Iraq ($22.5 million): In line with the reduced U.S. Government footprint in Iraq, the Administration 

envisions a much smaller bilateral assistance program in Iraq focused on U.S. priorities such as 

programs for vulnerable populations and democracy and governance. 

South and Central Asia ($1,185.1 million): The FY 2014 base request for South and Central Asia 

includes funding to support greater regional integration, increase economic reconstruction and 

development, promote democracy and good governance, and continue stabilization initiatives throughout 

both regions.

• Afghanistan ($535.3 million): FY 2014 base resources will provide support during the ongoing 

security transition and the Afghan Presidential election, perhaps the most critical phase of our 

engagement in Afghanistan. Continued, sustained support to Afghanistan throughout this period is 

essential to solidifying the progress made over the last decade and helping establish Afghanistan as a 

stable, prosperous, and secure nation in a stable, prosperous, and secure region. In concert with the 

ESF-OCO funding for Afghanistan, this request will strengthen Afghan public and private institutions 

to be sufficiently resilient to withstand the longer-term economic, security, and governance 

challenges associated with the security transition and the drawdown of international forces. In the 

transition period, programming will shift from an emphasis on stability interventions to medium- and 

long-term efforts in key areas in economic growth, agriculture, health, education, rule of law, and 

good governance, all of which are critical to Afghanistan’s development. Resources will continue to 

emphasize support of women and girls and their full participation in the economic, social and political 

arenas. U.S. assistance will be allocated in accordance with the Tokyo Mutual Accountability 

Framework, which prioritizes and incentivizes Afghan reforms in areas including respect for the 

rights of women and minorities, improved governance, anti-corruption efforts, and improved 

legislation to support private investment. 

• Pakistan ($513.5 million): Base resources requested in FY 2014 will support the continued 

implementation of the U.S. Civilian Assistance Strategy for Pakistan. Assistance will include 

medium- to long-term development assistance programs that will further the foundation for a stable 

economy and a strong, moderate, competent, and democratic government that exercises authority 

across all of its territory and is responsive to its people. Funding will focus on programs to help 

Pakistan address its energy challenges; increase economic growth, including agriculture; help 

stabilize vulnerable areas; and improve delivery of social services, particularly education and health. 

Improving governance, accountability, and gender equality are cross-cutting priorities in all sectors. 

Assistance for short-term stabilization programs that provide immediate assistance to conflict-prone 

areas is requested in ESF-OCO.

92
• Kyrgyz Republic ($38.3 million): U.S. assistance is focused on supporting newly-formed 

democratic institutions and addressing the Kyrgyz Republic’s broad, underlying development 

challenges and chronic instability, which were exacerbated by the effects of the 2010 political 

upheaval and ethnic violence. Programs will work to bolster civil society and democratic 

institutions, support the rule of law and human rights, empower the private sector, strengthen food 

security, and address key social issues such as education. 

• Nepal ($34.5 million): Funding will help increase food security; combat the effects of global 

climate change; and support community mediation to address local disputes before they escalate to 

conflict and violence. Programs will also build the capacity of governmental and non-governmental 

organizations to combat human trafficking; support the integration of former Maoist combatants into 

a post-conflict society; and assist the Nepal Election Commission with security planning and 

preparations for upcoming elections. Disaster risk reduction will be integrated across foreign 

assistance activities. 

• Tajikistan ($19.1 million): Assistance is focused on ensuring the stability of Tajikistan, particularly 

in light of the military drawdown in Afghanistan. Programs will seek to strengthen local governance 

and improve education. Funding will also be used to increase food security by seeking to solve 

systemic problems that contribute to food shortages such as inequitable access to water, inadequate 

supplies of seeds and fertilizer, a lack of modern technologies, and poor farm practices.

• Central Asia Regional ($20.9 million): In FY 2014, U.S. assistance will continue to support 

regional cross-border activities under the New Silk Road initiative, which aims to further 

Afghanistan’s economic integration into the broader region. Specifically, these resources will fund 

projects that increase trade and improve the transit of legal goods and services across borders, 

increase regional cooperation on the use of energy resources, increase cooperation and rational use of 

water and other natural resources, and improve governance along trade and transit corridors. 

Western Hemisphere ($432.2 million): The FY 2014 ESF request promotes four interconnected and 

broadly shared goals: expanded economic and social opportunity, citizen safety for all peoples, effective 

democratic governance and institutions, and a clean energy future. The investments in the Western 

Hemisphere are critical to deterring the reach of criminal organizations and gang violence throughout the 

region. Funding will be targeted strategically at economic development needs that help support regional 

security. Education and skills training programs for at-risk youth will help address root causes of 

criminal activity. Trade capacity building programs promote free trade, international investment, and 

economic partnerships with the region. 

• Colombia ($140 million): U.S. assistance will support the Government of Colombia (GOC)’s 

efforts to enhance sustainable change and marginalize illegal groups while ensuring GOC presence in 

post-conflict areas. Programs will target areas with a high concentration of vulnerable populations 

historically most affected by conflict, with particular focus on Afro-Colombians, indigenous groups, 

and former child soldiers. The request continues support for the development pillar of the Colombia 

Strategic Development Initiative and will ensure that important progress in rule of law, human rights, 

and economic and social development is sustained. Programs will build on the security gains 

achieved, support alternative development, enhance the capabilities of justice personnel, strengthen 

the criminal justice system, support internally displaced persons and vulnerable populations, and 

expand economic opportunity. These programs will continue to focus on carefully identified 

strategic geographic zones in which violence, illicit crop cultivation, and drug trafficking converge. 

93
• Haiti ($139 million): Funding in the FY 2014 request will continue supporting the 

U.S. commitment to help build a stable and more prosperous Haiti by engaging in partnership with 

the Government and people of Haiti, and other donors and private sector partners. The request 

supports long-term development in the four strategic pillars of the Post-Earthquake U.S. Government 

Haiti Strategy and will focus on these key sectors: infrastructure and energy; food and economic 

security; health and other basic services; and governance and rule of law. The request provides 

support in these areas to help Haiti continue to rebuild and transform itself into a secure, prosperous, 

democratic nation that meets the needs of its people and contributes to regional stability.

• Western Hemisphere Regional ($98.2 million): The FY 2014 request will support critical and 

multi-account efforts under the Central America Regional Security Initiative (CARSI) ($61.5 million) 

and the Caribbean Basin Security Initiative (CBSI) ($29.2 million), as well as other WHA economic 

growth and Summit of the Americas-related initiatives ($7.5 million). CARSI and CBSI focus on 

reinforcing and creating accountable, democratic rule of law institutions, and address the underlying 

causes of violence stemming from illicit trafficking, transnational crime, and organized gangs. 

CARSI funding prioritizes the Northern Tier countries of Honduras, El Salvador, Belize, and 

Guatemala by strengthening law enforcement and rule of law institutions and empowering

distressed communities to address the underlying risk factors that lead to crime and violence. 

Funding will strengthen rule of law institutions to better administer justice, ensure due process, 

and protect human rights. 

In the Caribbean, CBSI builds and strengthens the rule of law and provides vocational training to 

at‐risk youth and other vulnerable populations to increase their licit employment opportunities. 

Violence from Central America and the Caribbean directly impacts U.S. security. 

U.S. assistance addresses these threats and aids the U.S. national interest. 

In addition to CARSI and CBSI, funding will support the Energy and Climate Partnership of the 

Americas, focusing particularly on integrating Central American energy sectors, electrical 

integration in the region, and climate change mitigation and adaptation. Finally, the funds will 

support expanded economic opportunity and better facilitation of trade, as well as support the 

outcomes established through the 2012 Summit of the Americas process. 

• Mexico ($35 million): The FY 2014 request will support our relationship with the new Mexican 

administration. The United States will continue its partnership with Mexico and expand mutual 

cooperation under the Merida Initiative to address security risks from drug trafficking, violent crime, 

and rule of law capacity in Mexico. Specifically, ESF funding will focus on strengthening and 

institutionalizing reforms to improve the rule of law and respect for human rights and building strong 

and resilient communities able to prevent and reduce crime and violence. A more stable Mexico will 

increase the United States' national security, enhance economic growth potential, and protect 

U.S. citizens along our shared border. 

• Cuba ($15 million): The FY 2014 request will support fundamental freedoms and respect for basic 

human rights. Programs will support humanitarian assistance to victims of political repression and 

their families, strengthen independent Cuban civil society, and promote basic freedoms, particularly 

freedom of expression. 

• Venezuela ($5 million): The FY 2014 request will help strengthen Venezuelan civil society and 

democratic institutions and support political competition-building efforts that will protect democratic 

space and seek to serve the interests and needs of the Venezuelan people. Funding will assist civil 

94
society and human rights organizations. 

Global Programs ($244.7 million): The FY 2014 ESF request also funds programs that are 

implemented worldwide. Highlights include:

• Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs (OES) ($116.5 million): As part 

of the President’s Global Climate Change Initiative (GCCI), OES programming constitutes an 

integral element of U.S. efforts on climate change. These funds include support for programs that 

forge new paths forward on clean energy and emissions reductions in connection with activities such 

as the Clean Energy Ministerial, the Major Economies Forum on Energy and Climate, the Climate 

and Clean Air Coalition, and the Global Methane Initiative, all of which were established as a result 

of U.S. diplomacy. FY 2014 funds will also support multilateral adaptation efforts through the Least 

Developed Countries Fund and Special Climate Change Fund, and sustainable landscapes and forests 

through the World Bank Forest Carbon Partnership Facility or similar programs. Outside of the 

GCCI, funds will support assistance to the Pacific Islands associated with the South Pacific Tuna 

Treaty that promotes American jobs and economic development in the important Pacific region. In 

addition, OES Partnerships funds will be used to promote cooperation and build global capacity for 

sound stewardship of environmental and natural resources in concert with global economic growth 

and social development. 

• Human Rights and Democracy Fund ($64 million): Through the implementation of innovative 

programs and use of new technologies, the FY 2014 request for the Human Rights and Democracy 

Fund will address human rights abuses globally, wherever fundamental rights are threatened; 

encourage open political space in struggling or nascent democracies and authoritarian regimes; 

support civil society activists worldwide; and protect populations that are at risk, including women, 

indigenous populations, and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgendered people. Programs will target 

protection of universal human rights, with a specific focus on ensuring the rights of traditionally 

marginalized populations, including people with disabilities and minority religious communities; 

support independent media and Internet Freedom; advance respect for workers’ rights; and promote 

human rights practices in the global business environment. 

• Special Representative for Global Women’s Issues (S/GWI) ($20 million): The FY 2014 request 

includes $20 million for S/GWI, of which $15 million is for a new State Department Full 

Participation Fund. The Fund's purpose is to advance gender equality and the status of women and 

girls in all foreign policy objectives, highlighting activities in women's political and civic 

participation; women and the economy, and women, peace and security. The Fund will support 

innovative efforts by bureaus and embassies to integrate gender into foreign assistance programming. 

The remaining $5 million is for actions in support of the National Action Plan for Women Peace and 

Security (WPS). 

• Economic Growth, Education and the Environment (E3) ($14.8 million): The requested funds 

will promote domestic finance for development by working with countries that have demonstrated a 

commitment to reform in the areas of fiscal transparency and revenue generation. The U.S. Agency 

for International Development (USAID) will also support U.S. export promotion by focusing on areas 

where improvements can have a catalytic impact on a developing nation’s ability to conduct 

cross-border trade. Economic growth is key to U.S. national security and the foundation of 

America’s strength. The Department of State and USAID build economic prosperity at home by 

opening markets overseas, promoting U.S. exports, and helping countries transition from developing 

to developed economies. 

95
• Energy Resources ($14 million): The FY 2014 request will support improved energy sector 

governance and transparency, technical engagement to build awareness of the challenges involved in 

developing unconventional resources, and power sector reform and development to support the 

expansion of access to electricity for the 1.3 billion people currently lacking access. These programs 

complement and support global diplomatic engagement on energy security issues and Administration 

energy initiatives, including Connecting the Americas 2022, the U.S.-Asia Pacific Comprehensive 

Partnership for a Sustainable Energy Future, and developing East Africa initiatives.

96
Middle East and North Africa Incentive Fund

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Middle East and North Africa Incentive Fund - - 580,000 580,000

The events unfolding in the Middle East and North Africa are the pre-eminent foreign policy challenge of 

our time. We recognize that the stability and security we seek in the region will only come through 

sustained reforms that respond to the aspirations of the region’s citizens. Our support for dignity, 

opportunity, and self-determination must be matched by actions that affirm our support. We have an 

opportunity to recast our assistance posture as one that promotes economic and political foundations for 

democracy, and builds new partnerships with the citizens who will shape their countries’ futures. If we 

fail, we risk reinforcing public cynicism and losing influence in a region critical to U.S. interests. If we 

succeed, we have a very real opportunity to help generate lasting stability, security, and prosperity that 

will provide a firmer foundation for the pursuit of U.S. strategic interests and will reduce the risk that 

future instability will require us to commit greater resources there in the long term.

Achieving these outcomes requires both committing resources commensurate with the challenge, and 

changing the way we do business in the region, including our approach to assistance. Bilateral funding 

in the region is being used to meet new requirements and to address continuing security commitments and 

challenges. Ongoing regional programs that support reforms and promote civic engagement will 

continue to help sustain demand for change. In addition, the request includes the Middle East and North 

Africa Incentive Fund (MENA IF) to complement traditional bilateral and regional programs and to 

provide a framework that will support lasting reform, building on the $770 million request in the FY 2013 

President’s Budget. 

The Fund will capitalize on the opportunities presented by the Arab Spring, supporting those countries 

that are moving to undertake the democratic and economic reforms necessary to address citizens’ 

demands and provide lasting stability in the region. To date, our response to the Arab Spring has 

involved identifying funding for new requirements from within existing budgets in FY 2011 and 

FY 2012. We have reallocated over $1.5 billion in existing funds from ongoing bilateral programs and 

from other sources to transitions in the Middle East and North Africa at great opportunity cost. Of this, 

$1 billion was new funding to these countries. This is not the best approach for long-term, strategic 

investments to support ongoing transitions. The MENA Incentive Fund will provide a transparent and 

flexible source that reflects our new priorities with the range of tools necessary to support 

U.S. engagement on economic and political reforms in the region. Many of these interventions – support 

to Syrian opposition, humanitarian assistance, Enterprise Funds, and loan guarantees – are similar to what 

we would anticipate funding through the MENA IF. The magnitude of the need is clear from these 

investments to date. Providing funding for the MENA IF in FY 2014 will provide continuity and 

confidence in our commitment to the region and clearly-identified funding to continue supporting 

reforms. The MENA Incentive Fund will complement bilateral assistance but will not be allocated at the 

outset to any specific countries. 

MENA IF will put into practice the President’s strategy in the region, provide support to citizen demands 

for change, improve our ability to respond adroitly to contingencies and new opportunities, and begin to 

address the imbalance between our security and economic assistance in the region. MENA IF will also 

provide the United States with additional tools to work with our international partners to support changes 

in the MENA region (for example, through the G-8 Deauville Partnership), allowing us to use our 

97
investment to leverage international resources. The MENA Incentive Fund may provide assistance 

bilaterally, regionally, or through contributions to multilateral initiatives with other donors. The kinds of 

support we are providing through the Deauville Partnership, for example, provide significant international 

attention to reforms and leverages additional funding. These kinds of long-term incentive programs that 

are based on negotiated agreements will require authorities to use a range of tools and longer availability 

periods. The authorities requested in the account provide tools like loan guarantees that will allow us to 

leverage additional resources (e.g. self-pay or other donors) and maximize our investment. This tool, for 

example, would be used to address fiscal gaps and would require requisite reforms.

The primary purpose of the Fund is to advance democratic, institutional, and economic reform by 

MENA governments and their people. MENA IF will also ensure local accountability for reform 

commitments through support for civil society actors. The entry-point for governments wishing to 

access these resources will be public political and/or economic reform plans, incentivized by the prospect 

of resources for high-impact projects and activities demonstrating significant economic returns or 

democratic progress. Country proposals will be analyzed with interagency experts to identify strategic 

priorities, key reform areas, country reform commitments, the involvement of citizen representatives, the 

cost-benefit of the specific program intervention, and feasibility (e.g. U.S. Government management 

capacity, implementation mechanisms, host country absorptive capacity). It will also take into account 

existing programming, host country financing, and other donor support. 

MENA IF will promote two primary outcomes in transitioning MENA countries: 

• Effective, democratic governance and vibrant civil societies – The Fund will support local 

accountability for reform commitments through support for civil society actors’ engagement in 

transitions. The Fund will provide support and incentives for countries in transition to help ensure 

governments acquire power through transparent, competitive, and inclusive processes; to establish 

transparent, predictable, and accountable public governance under the rule of law, with equal access 

for all; to actively engage citizens, the private sector, and civil society in public decision-making, 

including through rights to organize, assemble, speak, and access information on- and off-line; and to 

respect fundamental human rights for all. 

 

• Inclusive, market-based economic growth – The MENA Incentive Fund will promote, incentivize, 

and support legal, regulatory, and policy reforms and investments that will enhance broad-based 

economic opportunity, characterized by equitable, transparent, and predictable access to local, 

regional, and global capital and markets; regional trade integration; facilitation of entrepreneurship 

and the creation of small and medium enterprises; investments in science, technology, and innovation; 

support for domestic and international private sector investment; and innovative approaches to 

development finance, including domestic resource mobilization and leveraging private sector 

resources for capital-intensive investments that yield sustainable and broad economic benefits to 

states and their citizens. 

Secondly, this Fund will also allow us to respond to emerging opportunities to support early transitions

so that nascent reforms can continue. Our response in 2011 and 2012 to unfolding events demonstrated 

the need for funding in critical early periods. The MENA Incentive Fund will provide the capacity to 

support interim governments and civil society at times of transition and allow us to respond to 

unanticipated needs. These stabilization requirements may range from humanitarian and peacekeeping 

needs to fiscal stabilization and early security sector reforms. 

Finally, a key element of our ability to engage effectively in the region is our regional program 

platforms. The MENA Incentive Fund, therefore, includes the base funding for the Middle East 

98
Partnership Initiative (MEPI) and USAID’s Middle East Regional Program (MER), implemented by 

USAID’s Middle East Bureau with support from the Office of Middle East Programs based in Cairo. 

MEPI cultivates locally-led change through civil society support in every country of the MENA region 

where we have a diplomatic presence. MEPI provides a distinct yet complementary function from the 

MENA IF by providing direct support to civil society groups, political activists, and business leaders in 

their urgent efforts to promote political and economic reforms throughout the region. MEPI’s work 

responds to emerging opportunities and advances the Administration’s policy to support democratic 

transitions and reform through partnerships with the people of the region. 

USAID’s MER combines the previous support provided under shared services by the Asia Middle East 

regional program with the existing field-based program OMEP. The new MER designs and implements 

USAID’s regional activities that address trans-boundary issues such as MENA trade and investment, 

management of scarce water resources, and regional efforts to combat corruption and improve 

governance. MER also provides surge capacity and region-wide expertise and scope for our 

development activities that respond to regional transition and reform. 

99
Migration and Refugee Assistance

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Migration and Refugee Assistance 1,975,100 1,885,174 1,760,960 -214,140

Enduring 1,646,100 1,656,174 1,760,960 114,860

Overseas Contingency Operations2 329,000 229,000 - -329,000

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175).

2/ The FY 2012 OCO Actual level reflects the transfer of $100 million from the Pakistan Counterinsurgency Capability Fund to the Migration 

and Refugee Assistance account.

The international humanitarian programs of the U.S. Government provide critical protection and 

assistance to some of the world’s most vulnerable people: refugees, internally displaced persons (IDPs), 

stateless persons, vulnerable migrants, and victims of conflict. Reflecting the American people’s 

dedication to assisting those in need, programs funded through the Migration and Refugee Assistance 

(MRA) account save lives and ease suffering while upholding human dignity. They help stabilize 

volatile situations and prevent or mitigate conditions that breed extremism and violence, and are an 

essential component of U.S. foreign policy. The FY 2014 MRA request of $1,761 million will fund 

contributions to key international humanitarian organizations such as the UN High Commissioner for 

Refugees and the International Committee of the Red Cross, as well as contributions to non-governmental 

organization partners to address pressing humanitarian needs overseas and to resettle refugees in the 

United States. These funds support programs that meet basic needs to sustain life; provide protection and 

assistance to the most vulnerable, particularly women and children and the elderly; assist refugees with 

voluntary repatriation, local integration, or permanent resettlement in a third country; and foster the 

humane and effective management of international migration policies. 

Highlights:

• Overseas Assistance ($1,348.8 million): In both emergencies and protracted situations overseas, 

humanitarian assistance helps refugees, IDPs, stateless persons, conflict victims, and other vulnerable 

migrants to meet their basic needs and enables them to begin rebuilding their lives. Such support 

will include the provision of life-sustaining services, including water and sanitation, shelter, and 

healthcare, as well as programs that provide physical and legal protection to vulnerable beneficiaries 

and assist refugees to voluntarily return to their homes in safety or, when that is not an option, 

integrate into their host communities as appropriate. 

• Refugee Admissions ($362 million): Resettlement is a key element of refugee protection and 

efforts to find solutions to refugee displacement when repatriation and local integration are not viable 

solutions. As the country with the largest resettlement program in the world, the United States 

welcomes the most vulnerable refugees from a diverse array of backgrounds. Through 

non-governmental organization partners, these funds will help refugees and certain other categories of 

special immigrants to resettle in communities across the United States.

100
• Humanitarian Migrants to Israel ($15 million): This funding will maintain U.S. Government 

support for relocation and integration of Jewish migrants, including those from the former Soviet 

Union, Eastern Europe, and Africa, to Israel. 

• Administrative Expenses ($35.2 million): The Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration is 

responsible for the oversight of all programs funded through the MRA and the U.S. Emergency 

Refugee and Migration Assistance appropriations. Funds requested for FY 2014 will be used to 

ensure sound stewardship of resources and maximum impact for beneficiary populations and 

American taxpayers by stressing accountability and transparency in its management and monitoring 

of these critical humanitarian programs. The largest portion of administrative expenses will cover 

the salary, benefits, and travel costs of U.S. direct hire staff, including regional refugee coordinators 

posted in U.S. Embassies around the world. 

101
U.S. Emergency Refugee and Migration Assistance

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

U.S. Emergency Refugee and Migration 

Assistance

27,200 27,366 250,000 222,800

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175).

The Emergency Refugee and Migration Assistance Fund enables the President to provide humanitarian 

assistance for unexpected and urgent refugee and migration needs worldwide. The 2014 request of $250 

million will allow the United States to respond quickly to urgent and unexpected needs of refugees and 

other populations of concern, including, but not limited to, emergency humanitarian needs in Syria. To 

help meet these needs, the appropriations language provides that these funds can be transferred to 

the International Disaster Assistance account, as appropriate, after the President has made the requisite 

determination under section 2(c)(1) of the Migration and Refugee Assistance Act of 1962. 

In FY 2012, $36 million was provided from ERMA to address various humanitarian emergencies, 

including assisting refugees, internally displaced persons, vulnerable migrants, and other victims of 

conflict from Sudan and Mali. 

102
Peace Corps

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Peace Corps 375,000 377,295 378,800 3,800

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175).

The FY 2014 budget request for the Peace Corps of $378.8 million, of which $5 million is for the Office 

of Inspector General, will allow the Peace Corps to continue to meet its mission of spearheading progress 

in developing countries and promoting friendship between the American people and people overseas. 

This funding will also allow the agency to continue the sweeping reforms that have been put in place over 

the past few years. 

The Peace Corps takes a unique approach to meeting its development and outreach goals. The agency 

selects, trains, and supports American Volunteers who spend 27 months living and working in areas that 

other programs are often unable to reach. During their service Volunteers do not just work with the 

community; they become part of it. They eat the same food, live in the same kind of housing, speak the 

same language, and use the same transportation as other members of the community. By doing so, 

Volunteers build mutual trust and respect, are able to advance the development needs of the host country, 

and promote a positive view of Americans more effectively. The Peace Corps’ FY 2014 request will 

fund approximately 7,300 Peace Corps Volunteers in more than 70 countries, ranging from the Caribbean 

to Central Asia, and from Africa to the Pacific islands. 

In FY 2014, the Peace Corps will continue recent reforms to improve the Volunteer experience and 

impact. Those reforms include the annual Country Portfolio Review process, which is an objective, 

data-driven method for reviewing and making decisions about where and how the agency operates 

globally; the Focus In/Train Up strategy, by which the Peace Corps is increasing the agency’s 

effectiveness – and its ability to measure that effectiveness – by focusing on the projects that have the 

greatest development impact; and newly instituted safeguards and training to enhance the safety and 

security of Volunteers and improve the support they receive.

The Peace Corps will also continue its partnerships with other federal agencies and the private/nonprofit 

sectors. With its unique ability to bring about lasting change in hard-to-reach communities, the Peace 

Corps is an important partner in a number of whole-of-government and interagency development 

initiatives, including the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), the President’s Malaria 

Initiative, and Feed the Future. In FY 2014, the Peace Corps will also continue the Global Health 

Service Partnership, a new public-private partnership to place health professionals at medical and nursing 

schools overseas.

Volunteers’ service to the United States continues long after they have left the Peace Corps. Many 

returned Volunteers use their training and experience to become leaders in society in areas ranging from 

private industry to development work, and from community service to Congress. The skills they acquire 

while serving – whether fluency in a foreign language, experience in complex problem-solving, or 

familiarity with a foreign culture – are invaluable to the United States. No less invaluable is the 

commitment to public service that the Peace Corps instills. Ultimately, the investment the Peace Corps 

makes in Volunteers – and the investment our nation makes in the Peace Corps – is returned many times 

over, at home and abroad. 

103
Millennium Challenge Corporation

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Millennium Challenge Corporation 898,200 903,697 898,200 -

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175).

The FY 2014 request of $898.2 million will allow the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) to 

continue to make significant contributions to the Administration’s foreign policy priorities, including 

advancing the Presidential Policy Directive on Global Development and strengthening food security. 

This funding will help high-performing poor countries reduce poverty, develop markets, and strengthen 

democratic governance. 

MCC contributes to country-led and results-focused development through five-year compact assistance 

programs designed to maximize sustainable poverty reduction by fostering economic growth. MCC also 

supports smaller two-to-three year threshold programs that address constraints to economic growth. 

Of the FY 2014 request, MCC plans to use $676.2 million for compact assistance. In December 2012, 

the Board selected five countries as eligible to develop a compact program: Liberia, Morocco, Niger, 

Sierra Leone, and Tanzania. All five countries have taken concrete steps to improve governance and 

qualify for MCC assistance, thus demonstrating the “MCC incentive effect”. In light of the limited 

resources requested by MCC, the countries will need to compete for funding by maintaining a strong 

commitment to democracy and good governance and developing high-quality, timely proposals to 

promote economic growth and reduce poverty. MCC also plans to use $20 million for threshold 

assistance to Guatemala and Nepal.

Across its portfolio, MCC emphasizes results and transparency. For all major compact investments, 

MCC estimates economic rates of return to assess the economic viability and return of proposed 

investments, and posts the results on its website (www.mcc.gov). MCC also works with partner 

countries to develop detailed monitoring and evaluation plans for compacts and tracks the progress of its 

compacts and projects against defined benchmarks and outcomes, which are also available on MCC’s 

website. 

The first step in MCC’s grant-making process is for MCC’s Board of Directors to determine which 

countries should be eligible for MCC assistance. When making compact eligibility determinations the 

Board starts with a list of countries that are candidates for MCC funding on the basis of per capita income 

and assesses the countries’ performance on twenty indicators that measure policy performance in three 

categories: ruling justly, investing in people, and economic freedom. In addition to the policy 

performance indicators, the Board factors in the availability of funds to MCC and a compact’s ability to 

reduce poverty and improve economic growth. After the Board selects countries as compact eligible, 

MCC works with countries to develop a compact. Countries are responsible for identifying and 

prioritizing their own barriers to poverty reduction and economic growth and conducting consultations 

across the private sector and civil society to ensure that there is widespread public support for compact 

investments. Throughout the process, MCC works to ensure there is transparency and country ownership 

of compact programs. 

104
Since 2004, MCC has signed 26 compacts and 23 threshold agreements, committing over $9.6 billion to 

worldwide poverty reduction through results-driven programs built on measureable and transparent 

objectives. Thanks to MCC compact programs, training for more than 210,851 farmers has boosted 

productivity and food security, and completion of more than 1,712 kilometers of roads has ensured 

improved access to markets, schools, and health clinics. 

105
Inter-American Foundation

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request 

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Inter-American Foundation 22,500 22,638 18,100 -4,400

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175).

The FY 2014 request of $18.1 million for the Inter-American Foundation (IAF) will enable the agency to 

provide targeted, small-dollar investments to help marginalized, poor communities in the Western 

Hemisphere undertake their own development initiatives. Due to budgetary constraints, the FY 2014 

budget cuts the IAF’s funding by nearly 20 percent. Despite these cuts, the IAF will seek to maintain its 

current program level by pursuing partnership opportunities with other U.S. Government agencies, the 

private sector and by further reducing overhead costs. In FY 2014, the IAF will support 

U.S. Government priorities and interests in Latin America and the Caribbean to reduce poverty, 

strengthen the practice of democracy, contribute to an environment of increased personal security, and 

foster better economic development by supporting projects that create jobs, increase incomes, improve 

food security, encourage civic engagement, promote sustainable agricultural practices, preserve the 

environment, and improve access to water, utilities and basic housing. 

Through its 40 years of experience, the IAF has developed specialized expertise in identifying and 

investing in poor and marginalized groups that have the capacity to advance their own communities. The 

IAF coordinates with other U.S. Government agencies and leverages private contributions from local 

partners and community beneficiaries to further strengthen its community-based development approach. 

As a result, the IAF’s investment of nearly $700 million has enabled grantees to mobilize nearly $1 

billion more from local, regional, and private sources. 

The IAF will continue to leverage development resources into long-term, strategic benefits for the poor in 

order to maximize the impact of U.S. Government dollars. One example is the IAF-initiated business 

sector network, RedEAmérica. Through this initiative, Latin American corporate foundations direct an 

additional two dollars for every dollar invested by the IAF in grassroots organizations. This initiative has 

helped corporate partners move beyond charitable philanthropy to more strategic investments that 

promote long-term, self-help development. Similarly, by sharing their experience and expertise with 

community foundations, hometown associations, and other diaspora groups, the IAF has helped channel 

more resources into effective development projects that deliver concrete results in communities with the 

greatest need.

The IAF will complement and enhance the value of investments made by other U.S. foreign assistance 

agencies by helping grassroots groups recognize and take advantage of infrastructure and other 

large-scale investments or new trade opportunities. 

106
African Development Foundation

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

African Development Foundation 30,000 30,184 24,000 -6,000

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175).

The FY 2014 request of $24 million for the African Development Foundation (ADF) programs will 

provide resources to establish new grants in 23 African countries and resources to monitor and maintain 

an active portfolio of 400 grants. ADF is a public corporation and an independent agency of the 

U.S. Government that supports African-designed and African-driven initiatives to address grassroots 

economic problems and promote sustainable development. ADF provides grants of up to $250,000 

directly to community groups, agricultural cooperatives, and small enterprises operating in under-served 

communities, primarily in conflict and post-conflict areas across Africa. Grant activities typically focus 

on production and related activities that increase food security and generate new economic opportunities. 

Via ADF’s 3-part model of business planning, funding, and implementation, African organizations create 

and sustain jobs, increase income levels, and concretely address other social needs. ADF also awards 

grants to African NGOs and other firms, to establish sustainable in-country development expertise and to 

provide ongoing technical assistance to project grantees. 

ADF leverages additional matching program funds through strategic partnerships with several African 

governments and with other donor entities. In FY 2014, ADF will be expanding these outreach efforts. 

Leveraged funds and a lower-cost operating model help make ADF an efficient foreign assistance 

provider to Africa. Concurrently, ADF contributes to increased national, regional and international 

economic development through direct grants to producer groups, processors, and others at the grassroots 

level. ADF's support allows smallholders to participate in certain trade activities so that they can 

contribute to and benefit from the increased revenues and opportunities associated with economic growth. 

ADF programs support three important strategic goals:

• important security interests across Africa, such as the Sahel corridor (including Mali, Mauritania, and 

Niger) and the Horn of Africa (including Kenya and Somalia); 

• the Administration’s development priorities, including Feed the Future and the Young African 

Leaders Initiative; and

• results-and evidence-based programming.

107
Treasury Technical Assistance and Debt Restructuring

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Treasury Technical Assistance and Debt 

Restructuring 

39,000 39,229 23,500 -15,500

Technical Assistance - Enduring 25,448 25,604 23,500 -1,948

Technical Assistance - Overseas Contingency 

Operations

1,552 1,552 - -1,552

Debt Restructuring - Enduring 12,000 12,073 - -12,000

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175).

Treasury Technical Assistance

The FY 2014 Request includes $23.5 million for Treasury’s Office of Technical Assistance (OTA). This 

small program achieves big objectives as it fosters economic growth by enabling a government to provide 

better services for its citizens and reduce dependency on foreign aid. For over 20 years, OTA has helped 

developing countries build effective financial management systems—a core element of a well-functioning 

state. These financial management systems include: building efficient revenue collection, well-planned 

and executed budgets, judicious debt management, sound banking systems, and strong controls to combat 

corruption and other economic crimes. The program provides significant, cost-effective value for 

U.S. development, foreign policy, and national security objectives. 

Debt Restructuring

No funding is requested for the Debt Restructuring account in FY 2014, though the request for the 

Economic Support Fund includes authorization to transfer up to $300 million to cover the cost of Heavily 

Indebted Poor Country (HIPC) debt relief for Sudan, should the Secretary of State determine that Sudan 

has made progress along various fronts the U.S. has identified as pre-conditions for any U.S. support for 

debt relief, including implementing agreement reached by the Governments of Sudan and South Sudan 

under the Comprehensive Peace Agreement and other legislative requirements related to HIPC debt relief, 

including determinations on human rights and state sponsorship of terrorism. 

108
International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

International Narcotics Control and Law 

Enforcement 

1,635,705 2,051,199 1,473,727 -161,978

Enduring 1,061,100 1,067,594 1,129,727 68,627

Overseas Contingency Operations2 574,605 983,605 344,000 -230,605

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175).

2/ The FY 2012 OCO Actual reflects the transfer of $409 million from the International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement account to the 

Economic Support Fund ($285.5 million), Transition Initiatives ($37 million), Nonproliferation, Antiterrorism, Demining and Related Programs 

($0.5 million), and Peacekeeping Operations ($86 million) accounts.

The FY 2014 International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement (INCLE) enduring request of 

$1,129.7 million will support country and global programs critical to combat transnational crime, disrupt 

illicit trafficking, and assist partner nations to build their capacities to extend their reach of justice under 

the rule of law. INCLE-funded programs seek to close the gaps between law enforcement jurisdictions 

and strengthen weak or corrupt law enforcement institutions. FY 2014 INCLE funds are focused where 

security situations are most dire, and are used in tandem with host country government resources in 

order to maximize impact. 

The INCLE request recognizes criminal networks disrupt U.S. trade, licit productivity and economic 

opportunities, while creating security vulnerabilities for U.S. citizens around the world. The FY 2014 

INCLE request will continue to address national and personal security concerns in strategically important 

geographic regions such as the Western Hemisphere, South Central Asia, and Near East Asia. The 

request also focuses on emerging threats to stability and regional security in Central Asia and Africa. 

The FY 2014 INCLE-OCO request includes funding for Afghanistan. 

Highlights: 

Africa

• South Sudan ($22 million): Funding will be used to develop the Republic of South Sudan’s 

capacity to provide civilian security and basic justice services. Funds will support technical 

assistance and training for South Sudan’s criminal justice sector officials, both through bilateral 

programs and through support to the UN Mission in South Sudan. INCLE programs will enhance 

short and long-term stability as South Sudan transitions domestic security responsibility away from 

the military to the South Sudan National Police Service and develops its justice and correctional 

institutions. 

• Liberia ($11.7 million): As the United Nations Mission in Liberia (UNMIL) draws down its 

military forces; assistance will support the gradual transition of security responsibilities to the 

Government of Liberia. Assistance will continue to provide a U.S. civilian police contribution to 

UNMIL as well as bilateral support to the Liberia National Police, other civilian law enforcement 

agencies (including counternarcotics efforts), the justice sector, and the judiciary.

109
• Africa Regional ($17 million): The request includes funding for three programs covering different 

regions in Africa that focus on countering terrorism and reducing transnational threats: the 

Trans-Sahara Counter-terrorism Partnership (TSCTP), the Partnership for Regional East African 

Counter Terrorism (PREACT), and the West Africa Regional Initiative (WARSI). Both TSCTP and 

PREACT focus on enhancing the capabilities of partner nations to prevent and respond to terrorism in 

their respective regions. WARSI focuses on enhancing rule of law, promoting security sector 

reform, and building partner nations’ capacity to counter transnational threats, including narcotics 

trafficking.

East Asia and the Pacific

• Indonesia ($10.1 million): Assistance programs in Indonesia will strengthen and professionalize 

criminal justice sector institutions, including police and prosecutors. In addition to broad reform and 

institution-building efforts, the programs will support specialized capacity to investigate, interdict, 

and prosecute money laundering, terrorism, and other transnational crimes. INCLE funding will also 

support the Indonesian Government's counternarcotics efforts. 

• Philippines ($8 million): Funding for the Philippines will build on previous years’ achievements by 

broadening and deepening Philippine criminal justice sector institutional capacity. Funds will 

support police training and infrastructure development in the southern Philippines to shore up internal 

stability and build police investigative capacity in the wake of the Philippine military’s withdrawal. 

In the justice sector, funds will support leadership development in the judiciary and prosecutors’ 

offices and add a greater focus on anti-corruption assistance. 

Europe and Eurasia

• Kosovo ($10.7 million): U.S. assistance in Kosovo will support efforts to increase the capacity, 

professionalism, and accountability of law enforcement and justice sector institutions. Funds will be 

used to support the U.S. contribution to the European Union’s rule of law mission; continue efforts to 

create and institutionalize democratic legal structures that meet international standards; and improve 

Kosovo’s ability to investigate and prosecute complex criminal cases, such as war crimes, organized 

crime, and corruption.

• Bosnia and Herzegovina ($6.7 million): Funding for Bosnia and Herzegovina will support 

programs designed to strengthen and professionalize Bosnian law enforcement and justice sector 

institutions. Specifically, funds will support efforts to increase the use of advanced investigative 

skills of the police and prosecutors, improve the trial advocacy capacity of state and sub-state level 

prosecutors, and strengthen the role of the judge as a neutral arbiter. Resources will also be used to 

support victim witness support offices at the sub-state level, bolster efforts to improve court security, 

and enhance police-prosecutor cooperation, with special emphasis on corruption and war crimes 

cases.

Near East

• West Bank and Gaza ($70 million): Assistance in West Bank and Gaza will continue to focus on 

reforming the security sector, and sustaining and maintaining the capabilities of the security forces 

have benefitted from U.S. Government- provided training, equipment, and infrastructure. Greater 

emphasis on technical assistance, including the continuation of infrastructure support and initial, 

basic, refresher and specialized training to the security forces, will encourage Palestinian Authority 

Security Forces to be more self-sufficient. Funding also will be used to replenish worn security force 

110
equipment. Technical assistance and project support will be provided to the Palestinian Authority 

Ministry of Interior to improve its ability to manage and provide oversight over the security forces. 

Additional training, equipment, infrastructure support, and technical assistance will be provided for 

the justice and corrections sectors to ensure their development keeps pace with the rising performance 

of the security forces.

• Iraq ($23.1 million): In FY 2014, the Administration will continue rule of law, anti-corruption, and 

drug demand reduction programming in Iraq to build on progress in combating corruption, promoting 

judicial security, and advancing professional development within the criminal justice sector. To 

maintain strong U.S. relationships with promising Iraqi police leaders and support their professional 

development, the FY 2014 request seeks funding for an annual International Police Education and 

Training (IPET) program. This modest program would establish training fellowships in the 

United States. IPET would complement the ongoing U.S.-based police training program 

administered by the International Association of Chiefs of Police. 

• Lebanon ($13.9 million): Support for Lebanon’s security forces is a key component of U.S. efforts 

to strengthen the institutions of the Lebanese state, promoting stability and security in both Lebanon 

and the region. Funding will continue to improve the capacity of the Internal Security Forces (ISF) 

to exert sovereign authority throughout Lebanese territory, which is critical to the successful 

implementation of UNSCR 1701. FY 2014 funding will be used to provide technical assistance to 

the ISF to increase their professionalism and continue their shift in orientation toward the protection 

of, and service to, the Lebanese population, while improving country-wide perceptions of the ISF as a 

professional, non-sectarian institution. Additionally, funding will continue to support corrections 

reform efforts to improve prison management and operations. 

• Tunisia ($8 million): U.S. program assistance will support the ongoing police reform process, 

including Tunisian efforts to make civilian law enforcement institutions more accountable and 

transparent; enhance the professionalism, independence, and accountability of the judiciary; and 

enhance the capacity of the Tunisian correctional system to manage prisons and detention centers in a 

safe, secure, humane, and transparent fashion.

• Egypt ($4.1 million): Ongoing unrest in Egypt and recent clashes between security forces and 

protestors draw attention to the important role of police reform in Egypt’s post-Mubarak transition 

and the need for effective, democratic security institutions. U.S. foreign assistance will support 

reforms in the police and justice sectors to help Egypt develop institutions that are professional, 

accountable, and responsive to the public. 

South and Central Asia

• Afghanistan ($160 million): As the United States reduces the size and scope of its presence in 

Afghanistan; we are focusing programs on long-term sustainability and increased transfer of skills 

and responsibility to the Afghan Government and civil society partners. We are aggressively 

working to drive down costs of programs by moving from commercial contractor implementers to 

international organizations and grantees, and by increasing reliance on Afghan professionals. The 

FY 2014 INCLE request will support training, mentoring, equipment, and infrastructure support in 

key ministries involved in the administration of justice, including corrections. The request also 

supports counternarcotics programs, including strengthening the Afghan Government’s ability to 

combat illicit cultivation, production, trafficking, and consumption. Funds will be used for all 

program support, including aviation. 

111
• Pakistan ($45 million): In order to support the Administration’s national security priorities in 

Pakistan, the FY 2014 INCLE request will continue to focus on strengthening Pakistan’s criminal 

justice sector. Funds will be used to enhance the capacities of Pakistan’s civilian law enforcement 

agencies through training, equipment, and infrastructure assistance that increases their ability to 

provide security in Pakistan, particularly in areas along the border with Afghanistan. Funding will 

also be used to support the training of prosecutors, judges, and corrections officials. 

Counternarcotics assistance will continue efforts to reduce the presence and use of narcotics in 

Pakistan through interdiction, crop control, and demand reduction programs. 

• Central Asia Counternarcotics Initiative (CACI) ($7 million): This initiative will improve the 

ability of Central Asian countries to disrupt drug trafficking originating from Afghanistan and 

dismantle related criminal organizations through effective investigation, prosecution and conviction 

of mid- to high-level traffickers. The U.S. Counternarcotics Strategy for Afghanistan calls for 

enhanced regional and international community support for Afghan-led counternarcotics efforts, 

expanded U.S. Government counternarcotics engagement with Afghanistan’s neighbors and regional 

actors, and strengthening of counternarcotics cooperation between Afghanistan and neighboring 

countries. 

• Tajikistan ($7 million): Assistance to Tajikistan will promote security sector reform and the 

development of democratic institutions through border security, police reform, and justice reform 

programming. With the impending withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan, these resources are 

intended to help mitigate potential instability and build the capacity of Tajikistan’s law enforcement 

agencies to address transnational threats emanating from Afghanistan and the broader region. 

Western Hemisphere

• Mexico ($148.1 million): With the FY 2014 INCLE request, the United States and Mexican 

Governments will continue to focus on institutionalizing the rule of law, disrupting and dismantling 

criminal organizations, building a 21st Century border, and building strong and resilient communities. 

INCLE-funded programs will focus on developing Mexico’s rule of law institutions through training, 

technical assistance, and limited equipment purchases. Programs will continue to provide assistance 

to federal and state criminal justice institutions, including law enforcement, prosecutorial, judicial, 

and corrections institutions. 

• Colombia ($149 million): Funding will support Colombian-led consolidation efforts to expand 

security, reduce drug trafficking and cultivation of illicit crops, and promote economic development 

through a comprehensive whole-of-government approach in former conflict and key rural areas. 

INCLE resources will also help the Colombian National Police to assume additional security 

responsibilities and combat the criminal drug organizations, the BACRIMs or “bandas criminales.” 

Resources dedicated for aerial and manual eradication of illicit crops will continue to significantly 

reduce cocaine production, while support for interdiction efforts will assist in preventing the annual 

arrival of multiple metric tons of drugs to the United States and other markets. Funding will also 

support Colombia’s judicial institutions, enhancing the protection of human rights and developing 

local capacity to address sensitive and complex criminal cases.

• Peru ($26.3 million): The FY 2014 INCLE request will support efforts by the Government of Peru 

to combat the illicit drug industry, including efforts to extend state presence in the Monzon region as 

well as the Apurimac and Ene River Valleys in order to oppose drug traffickers aligned with the 

Shining Path terrorist group. FY 2014 INCLE funds will support drug interdiction and coca 

eradication operations, as well as precursor chemical seizures, improved controls at ports and airports, 

112
judicial reform, modernized and refurbished police stations, bases and equipment, and increased 

capacity amongst rule of law actors. 

• Western Hemisphere Regional ($125 million): INCLE funding will support the Central America 

Regional Security Initiative (CARSI) ($100 million) and the Caribbean Basin Regional Security 

Initiative (CBSI) ($25 million). CARSI funds will support training and build capacity of law 

enforcement and rule of law institutions throughout Central America. Among other efforts, activities 

will address border and port security; support for vetted units and maritime and land interdiction; law 

enforcement capacity to address transnational crime, including anti-gang training; regional aviation; 

and efforts to combat impunity. In support of CBSI, INCLE funding will continue efforts to combat 

illicit trafficking and organized crime, increase port and border security, and strengthen the rule of 

law through training and technical assistance. Funding will support efforts to promote information 

sharing and collaboration among CBSI partner nations, while enhancing the capacity of criminal 

justice and regional security institutions, such as the Regional Security System in the Eastern 

Caribbean.

Global Programs

These programs target challenges to transnational crime and counternarcotics efforts, and policing in 

peacekeeping and crisis response operations worldwide. Key components include: 

• Inter-regional Aviation Support ($40 million): Funding will provide centralized core services for 

counternarcotics and border security aviation programs. These programs involve fixed- and 

rotary-wing aircraft deployed worldwide. 

• Program Development and Support ($39.6 million): Funding will provide for annual costs of 

direct hires, travel, equipment, communications and utilities, and other support services to design, 

implement, evaluate and oversee INCLE programs. FY 2014 funds include a one-time cost 

associated with the relocation of Washington-based INL personnel into one central location. 

• International Law Enforcement Academy (ILEA) ($24 million): Funds will support existing 

ILEAs in Bangkok, Budapest, Gaborone, Roswell, San Salvador, and the Regional Training Center 

(RTC) in Lima. Additionally, funds made available to support the Shared Security Partnership 

initiative will be used to support emerging regional security priorities in West Africa to enhance 

regional and local-level criminal justice institutions. The focus will be on facilitating regional 

cooperation and capacity building by providing strategic training at the West Africa RTC in Accra, 

Ghana that addresses high-profile crimes and a wide array of existing threats to U.S. national security 

posed by terrorist and criminal organizations. 

• Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons ($18.7million): These funds will assist 

committed governments of countries ranked as Tier 3, Tier 2 Watch List, and some Tier 2 in the 2012 

annual Trafficking in Persons Report to improve their capacity to combat trafficking in persons 

through rule of law and criminal justice sector improvements as well as victim protection services.

• Demand Reduction ($12.5 million): Funding for Demand Reduction will address pressing regional 

and global drug-related threats posed by methamphetamine, opiates such as heroin and opium, crack 

cocaine, and high-risk drug-using behavior that promote HIV/AIDS. Funding supports an innovative 

training model to certify addiction counselors, sub-regional training centers that disseminate 

best-practice approaches; drug-free community coalitions that target illegal drugs; research and 

demonstration that improve women’s treatment and minimize child addiction; and the development of 

113
science and technology to better detect, quantify, and understand drug use and its health-related 

consequences. 

• Anti-Crime Programs ($12.5 million): Funding will support efforts to address corruption and 

kleptocracy, money laundering and financial crimes, border security and alien smuggling, intellectual 

property and cyber crime, and transnational and organized crime. 

• Critical Flight Safety Program ($11.1 million): Funding will provide programmed depot-level 

maintenance and aircraft/aircrew safety of flight for the fixed- and rotary-wing aircraft fleet 

supporting counternarcotics and border security aviation programs worldwide. 

• Civilian Police and Rule of Law Program ($4.5 million): Funds support enhanced 

pre-deployment training of advisors sent overseas, and a center of excellence to improve the 

Department of State’s programming and ability to promote law enforcement, increase women’s 

participation in programs, improve the quality and consistency of curricula delivered, and expand 

domestic law enforcement partnerships. 

• International Police Peacekeeping Operations Support (IPPOS) Program ($2.5 million): Funds 

will provide training and capacity building support for police-contributing-countries to deploy highly 

trained and well-equipped officers to peacekeeping and stabilization missions, as well as help the 

United Nations with coordination, policy, and projects in support of police peacekeeping missions. 

Details of the FY 2014 OCO Request for INCLE are addressed in the OCO chapter. 

114
Nonproliferation, Anti-Terrorism, Demining

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Nonproliferation, Anti-Terrorism, Demining 711,270 714,381 616,125 -95,145

Enduring 590,113 593,724 616,125 26,012

Overseas Contingency Operations2 121,157 120,657 - -121,157

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175).

2/ The FY 2012 OCO Actual level reflects the transfer of $.5 million from the International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement account to 

the Nonproliferation, Anti-Terrorism and Related Programs account.

The FY 2014 Nonproliferation, Anti-Terrorism, Demining and Related Programs (NADR) request of 

$616.1 million will support critical programs that promote peace and security. The request sustains 

funding for the voluntary contribution to the International Atomic Energy Agency to demonstrate strong 

U.S. support for the agency, and includes an increase for the Counterterrorism Engagement program to 

expand Global Counterterrorism Forum rule of law-focused initiatives in the Middle East and in other 

priority countries. 

Highlights:

Nonproliferation Activities 

• The voluntary contribution to the International Atomic Energy Agency ($88 million) supports 

programs in nuclear safeguards, nuclear safety and security, nuclear energy, and the peaceful use of 

nuclear science technologies. This request underscores the U.S. commitment to the organization, 

particularly its nuclear safeguards program.

• The Global Threat Reduction (GTR) program ($63.5 million) supports tailored activities aimed at 

reducing the threat of terrorist or state acquisition of WMD materials and expertise. Initiatives 

include strengthening security for dangerous biological materials and potentially dangerous 

chemicals, engagement with scientists with WMD-applicable expertise, and decreasing the likelihood 

that terrorists could gain the technical expertise needed to develop an improvised nuclear device. 

GTR priorities include Yemen, Pakistan, and Iraq, where the combined risks of WMD proliferation 

and terrorism are greatest.

• The Export Control and Related Border Security program ($54 million) seeks to prevent states and 

terrorist organizations from acquiring WMD, their delivery systems, and destabilizing conventional 

weapons by helping partner countries to develop comprehensive strategic trade control and related 

border security systems. The program builds capacity to ensure that transfer authorizations support 

only legitimate trade, and to detect and interdict illicit transfers at borders.

• The contribution to the Preparatory Commission of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty 

Organization ($31 million) helps to fund the establishment, operation, and maintenance of the 

worldwide International Monitoring System as well as Preparatory Commission activities, including 

the development of the On-Site Inspection element of the Treaty’s verification system. An 

115
additional $1 million contribution will fund specific projects to increase the effectiveness and 

efficiency of the Treaty’s verification regime.

• The Nonproliferation and Disarmament Fund (NDF) ($25 million) develops, negotiates, and 

implements carefully-vetted programs to destroy, secure, or prevent the proliferation of weapons of 

mass destruction (WMD), WMD-related materials and delivery systems, and destabilizing 

conventional weapons. NDF undertakes rapid-response activities to reduce threats that are 

unforeseen and unanticipated around the globe, and is currently engaged in various activities in South 

Asia and the Middle East.

• The WMD Terrorism program ($5 million) undertakes specialized, targeted projects to improve 

international capacities to prepare for and respond to a terrorist attack involving weapons of mass 

destruction in support of the Global Initiative to Combat Nuclear Terrorism, and to help develop 

capacity among our international partners to deter, detect, and respond to nuclear smuggling. 

Anti -Terrorism Programs

• The Anti-Terrorism Assistance (ATA) program ($169.5 million) has long been the 

U.S. Government’s flagship program for counterterrorism law enforcement assistance to critical 

partner countries. ATA programs provide training, mentoring, advising, and equipment to help 

partner countries build or enhance a wide range of capabilities to detect, deter, and apprehend 

terrorists, including law enforcement investigations, border security, protection of critical targets, 

leadership and management of counterterrorism incidents, regional coordination and cooperation, 

critical incident management, and cyber security. ATA funding also supports the Regional Strategic 

Initiative, a global program that provides anti-terrorism training and equipment focused on addressing 

regional challenges.

• The Terrorist Interdiction Program/Personal Identification, Secure Comparison, & Evaluation System 

(TIP/PISCES) program ($25.1 million) provides computerized screening systems, periodic hardware 

and software upgrades, and technical assistance and training to partner nations that enable 

immigration and border control officials to quickly identify suspect persons attempting to enter or 

leave their countries. The request provides funds for the deployment of PISCES installations, 

including biometric enhancements, to critical partner and candidate nations vulnerable to terrorist 

travel -- such as Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen, Kenya, Thailand, and, since June 2012, Niger, Burkina 

Faso, and Chad, in addition to 12 other nations. The request also supports research, development and 

testing of enhanced capabilities to address evolving U.S. and host nation requests for customized 

interfaces with local and international databases, as well as deployment of portable PISCES 

installations for remote locations lacking infrastructure, while ensuring that the PISCES system 

maintains standards in accordance with international norms. 

• The Counterterrorism Financing (CTF) program ($15 million) provides funding for anti-money 

laundering and counterterrorism finance (AML/CTF) training and technical assistance initiatives to 

enable our frontline partners to detect, disrupt, and dismantle money laundering and terrorist 

financing networks. CTF capacity building efforts will include developing AML/CTF legal 

frameworks and regulatory structures, establishing active and capable financial investigative units, 

and strengthening the capabilities of other relevant law enforcement, prosecutorial, and judicial 

institutions. The CTF program generally works through the interagency Terrorist Finance Working 

Group (TFWG) to leverage AML/CTF expertise across the U.S. government to develop and 

implement comprehensive AML/CTF training and technical assistance. CTF also works with the 

116
Department of State Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs to ensure that 

recipients of funding implement action plans which comply with international standards against 

money laundering and the financing of terrorism. 

• Counterterrorism Engagement (CTE) program ($10 million) supports key bilateral, multilateral, and 

regional efforts to build political will among foreign government officials and civil societies to 

address shared counterterrorism challenges. By working with other government agencies and with 

nongovernmental organizations, CTE programs support initiatives and training, including through the 

United Nations and regional bodies to promote the rule of law and human rights while countering 

terrorism and raising awareness of the United Nations Global Counterterrorism Strategy and 

implementation of UN counterterrorism resolutions. This funding will also support activities of the 

Global Counterterrorism Forum, a multilateral forum that provides a platform for senior CT 

policymakers and experts to engage on a sustained basis to build and mobilize the expertise and 

resources needed to identify and address critical civilian counterterrorism capacity-building 

challenges in key regions and countries around the globe. 

• The Countering Violent Extremism (CVE) program ($3 million) supports targeted 

counter-recruitment interventions for at-risk communities in high priority countries, and aims to build 

resilience against violent extremist narratives. NADR-funded CVE programming focuses on 

building the capacity of partner countries’ law enforcement institutions to support community-level 

initiatives against violent extremism and address violent extremist threats in prisons 

(de-radicalization). 

Regional Stability and Humanitarian Assistance 

• The Conventional Weapons Destruction (CWD) program ($126 million) advances U.S. security and 

humanitarian interests by reducing the harmful worldwide effects of at-risk, illicitly-proliferated, and 

indiscriminately-used weapons of war. CWD activities mitigate security risks associated with 

excess, obsolete, unstable, or poorly-secured/maintained weapons and munitions stockpiles, including 

man-portable air defense systems (MANPADS), by assisting countries with destruction programs; 

improving physical security at storage facilities; and enhancing stockpile management practices. 

CWD also confronts the dangers posed by landmines and other explosive remnants of war (ERW) by 

surveying hazard areas, removing landmines and ERW, educating vulnerable populations, and 

assisting victims. CWD priorities for FY 2014 include preventing illicit small arms/light weapons 

(SA/LW) proliferation from Syria, denying SA/LW to destabilizing forces in North Africa and the 

Sahel, battle area clearance in the Middle East and North Africa/Sahel, clearing U.S.-origin ERW in 

Southeast Asia and Oceania, and reducing the threat of illicitly-held or at-risk MANPADS through 

safe and effective destruction efforts.

117
Peacekeeping Operations

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Peacekeeping Operations 509,818 385,671 347,000 -162,818

Enduring 302,818 304,671 347,000 44,182

Overseas Contingency Operations2 207,000 81,000 - -207,000

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175).

2/ The FY 2012 OCO Actual level reflects the transfer of $40 million from the Pakistan Counterinsurgency Capability Fund and $86 million 

from the International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement accounts to the Peacekeeping Operations account.

The FY 2014 request for Peacekeeping Operations (PKO) of $347 million will help diminish and resolve 

conflict, enhance the ability of states to participate in peacekeeping and stability operations, address

counterterrorism threats, and reform military establishments into professional military forces with respect 

for the rule of law in the aftermath of conflict. 

The request supports three ongoing regional peacekeeping missions: the African Union Mission in 

Somalia (AMISOM), the Multinational Force and Observers (MFO) mission in the Sinai, and the new 

African-led International Support Mission to Mali (AFISMA). The request also supports the ability of 

states to participate in peacekeeping operations through the Global Peace Operations Initiative (GPOI); 

enhances the ability of states to address counterterrorism threats through the Trans-Sahara 

Counterterrorism Partnership (TSCTP) and the Partnership for Regional East Africa Counter Terrorism 

(PREACT); supports long-term reforms to military forces in the aftermath of conflict to transform them 

into professional military forces with respect for the rule of law, including forces in South Sudan, Liberia, 

the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Somalia, Cote d’Ivoire, and Guinea; addresses regional conflict 

stabilization and border security issues in Africa; provides military professionalization institutional 

development; and provides regional maritime security training in Africa. 

Highlights:

• Mali ($83.8 million): Requested funds will continue to support AFISMA, which began in January 

2013 to stabilize Mali. Funds will support basic logistics support (e.g. food, fuel, and water) for 

Troop Contributing Countries (TCCs) and Police-Contributing Countries (PCCs); non-lethal 

equipment for TCCs and PCCs; training of TCCs; possible advisory support; and strategic transport 

of personnel and equipment. 

• Global Peace Operations Initiative ($75 million): FY 2014 funds will continue to provide 

training, equipment, and sustainment of peacekeeping troops. In addition, consistent with the shift 

begun in FY 2010 from direct training of peacekeepers to a focus on building a sustainable national 

peacekeeping capacity, activities will focus on strengthening partner-country capabilities to train their 

own peacekeeping units by supporting the development of national peacekeeping trainer cadres; 

peacekeeping training centers; and other self-sufficiency oriented programs, events, and activities. 

Funds will also enable the United States to continue to support the deployment of troops to 

peacekeeping operations worldwide. Some FY 2014 funds may be used to continue GPOI support 

for collaboration with the Center for Excellence in Stability Police Operations. Finally, PKO funds 

will continue to underwrite an evaluation and metrics mechanism, including measures of 

118
effectiveness, to ensure GPOI is achieving its goals. 

• Somalia ($70 million): FY 2014 funds will be used to continue voluntary support to AMISOM, 

including training and advisory services, equipment, and transportation of forces from current and 

new troop-contributing countries. Given the newly recognized government of Somalia and the 

security gains and expansion made by AMISOM, increased support to the national Somali military 

forces is critically important. Accordingly, PKO funds will be used to professionalize and provide 

operational support to Somali security forces, to ensure their capability in contributing to national 

peace and security in support of the international peace process efforts, and as part of a multi-sector 

approach to post-conflict security sector reform. Funds to pay the United States' portion of the UN 

assessment for support of the UN Support Office for the AMISOM (UNSOA) are being requested in 

the Contributions to International Peacekeeping Activities account. 

• South Sudan ($38 million): FY 2014 funds will be used to continue long-term efforts to build and 

transform the Sudan People’s Liberation Army in South Sudan from a guerilla army to a professional 

military force subordinate to civilian leadership and protective of human rights. Funds will continue 

to provide support for this transformation process, including the refurbishment, operations, and 

maintenance of training centers and divisional headquarters; strategic and operational advisory 

assistance; unit and individual professional training; and communications and other non-lethal 

equipment for the military.

• Multinational Force and Observers ($28 million): The FY 2014 request includes funds to 

continue the U.S. contribution to the Multinational Force and Observers mission in the Sinai, which 

supervises the implementation of the security provisions of the Egyptian-Israeli Peace Treaty, a 

fundamental element of regional stability.

• Africa Regional ($21.2 million): FY 2014 funds will be used to support the following programs. 

• Partnership for Regional East Africa Counterterrorism (PREACT) ($10 million): The FY 2014 

request continues support for PREACT, a multi-disciplinary counterterrorism initiative in East Africa 

that is based upon best practices of the TSCTP. Funds will support advisory assistance, and training 

and equipping of counterterrorist military units in the East Africa region.

• Africa Conflict Stabilization and Border Security (ACSBS) ($7.2 million): The FY 2014 request 

continues efforts to address and stabilize regional crises on the African continent. In particular, 

funds will support activities in areas such as the Great Lakes region in Central Africa, the Mano River 

region in West Africa, and the Horn of Africa. Examples include countering the Lord’s Resistance 

Army in Central and East Africa, and addressing spillover from the conflict in Sudan into neighboring 

Chad and the Central African Republic. Funds will support monitoring teams, advisory assistance, 

training, logistical support, infrastructure enhancements, and equipment. Funds will also support the 

military component of broader security sector reform efforts in Guinea through training, advisory 

services, limited infrastructure projects, and non-lethal equipment. 

• Africa Maritime Security Initiative (AMSI) ($2 million): The FY 2014 request includes funds to 

increase African maritime security capabilities through the provision of regional training activities 

(including the training component of the Department of Defense’s Africa Partnership Station 

program) and provide modest training equipment. By enhancing U.S. partners’ maritime 

enforcement capabilities, the initiative helps to develop African maritime forces that can better 

respond to piracy, terrorist activity, illegal fishing, environmental threats, and trafficking in drugs, 

arms, and humans. 

119
• Africa Military Education Program (AMEP) ($2 million): The FY2014 request will support 

professionalization at the institutional level of select African partner nations. This program will 

complement, but not duplicate, the International Military Education Training program which focuses 

on direct training of African military and select civilian personnel primarily in the United States, 

although some training occurs in country. AMEP funds will provide training, advisory support, and 

potentially equipment and supplies to African military training institutions to enhance their ability to 

professionalize their militaries, including an appreciation of civilian control of the military, respect 

for the rule of law, and human rights. 

• Trans-Sahara Counterterrorism Partnership (TSCTP) ($16.1 million): The FY 2014 request 

continues support for the TSCTP, a multi-disciplinary counterterrorism initiative designed to counter 

terrorist threats, strengthen regional capacity, promote interoperability, and facilitate coordination 

between countries. Funds will support advisory assistance, modest infrastructure improvement, and 

training and equipping of counterterrorist military units in the West and North African regions. 

• Democratic Republic of the Congo ($11 million): FY 2014 funds will be used to continue 

long-term efforts to reform the military in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) into a force 

capable of maintaining peace and security, to include development of the military justice system and 

sustaining a light infantry battalion to stabilize eastern DRC. Funds will support advisory assistance 

at the strategic and operational levels, training, equipment, and infrastructure improvements that 

contribute to the professionalization of the Congolese military. 

• Cote d’Ivoire ($2 million): The FY2014 request will continue to support the military component of 

broader security sector reform efforts in Cote d'Ivoire. Funds will support training, advisory support, 

limited infrastructure, and non-lethal equipment. 

• Liberia ($2 million): The FY 2014 request continues to support the long term effort to transform 

the Liberian military into a professional, 2,100-member-strong armed force that respects the rule of 

law and has the capacity to protect Liberia’s borders and maintain adequate security in the country. 

Funds will primarily provide for operational support of existing infrastructure of the new military and 

some advisory and/or training support. 

120
International Military Education and Training

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

International Military Education and Training 105,788 106,435 105,573 -215

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175).

The FY 2014 request for the International Military Education and Training (IMET) program is $105.6 

million. As a key component of U.S. security assistance, IMET promotes regional stability and defense 

capabilities through professional military training and education. Through professional and technical 

courses and specialized instruction, most of which are conducted at military schoolhouses in the 

United States, the program provides students from allied and friendly nations with valuable training and 

education on U.S. military practices and standards. IMET students are exposed to the concepts of 

democratic values and respect for internationally-recognized standards of human rights both through the 

courses they attend and through their experience of living in and being a part of local communities across 

the United States. IMET serves as an effective means to strengthen military alliances and international 

coalitions critical to U.S. national security goals. IMET also helps to develop a common understanding 

of shared international challenges, including terrorism, and fosters the relationships necessary to counter 

those challenges in a collaborative manner. 

Highlights:

• Africa ($13.5 million): IMET programs focus on professionalizing defense forces in support of 

efforts to respond to regional crises and provide for long-term stability on the continent. Major 

IMET programs are focused in Kenya, Nigeria, Senegal, South Africa, and South Sudan - states 

critical to long-term regional peace and stability. There is also a new request for Somalia given the 

recognition of the government of Somalia in January 2013. 

• East Asia and the Pacific ($9.3 million): IMET programs in East Asia and the Pacific focus on 

professionalizing the defense forces of regional partners and developing their skills in counter 

terrorism. Priority recipients include Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Thailand, and Vietnam.

• Europe and Eurasia ($29.6 million): IMET programs enhance regional security and 

interoperability among U.S., NATO, and European armed forces. Importantly, these programs help 

to ensure that those nations that fight alongside the United States have officers that understand and 

appreciate the doctrine and operational tactics of the U.S. military. The largest programs are those in 

Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Georgia, Poland, Romania, Turkey, and Ukraine. 

• Near East ($20.5 million): IMET programs focus on critical countries such as Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, 

Lebanon, Morocco, Oman, Tunisia, and Yemen with the purpose of enhancing professionalism, 

providing the technical training necessary to maintain equipment of United States origin, and 

increasing awareness of international norms of human rights and civilian control of the military, 

topics that are critical for the development of security forces in the region in a time of change.

• South and Central Asia ($13.3 million): Major IMET programs in this region include Pakistan, 

Afghanistan, India, Bangladesh, and the Kyrgyz Republic. This assistance will expose future 

military leaders to U.S. military practices and values, including respect for the rule of law, human 

121
rights, and civilian control of the military, while fostering U.S. security cooperation and improving 

the professionalism and defense capabilities of partner militaries in areas such as border security and 

counterterrorism. Programming in South Asia will also focus on increasing the capacity of partners 

to strengthen maritime security in the region.

• Western Hemisphere ($14.4 million): IMET programs in the Western Hemisphere focus on 

professionalizing defense forces, including those of Colombia, El Salvador, and Mexico, and 

enhancing their ability to respond to regional security challenges. Priorities include promoting the 

continued professionalization and modernization of Colombian military forces with a focus on human 

rights and strengthening the Government of Mexico's efforts to professionalize Mexican military 

personnel, to further institutionalize respect for human rights and the rule of law in military 

operations, and to improve and expand the military's capacity to fight international crime. 

122
Foreign Military Financing

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Foreign Military Financing 6,312,000 6,343,885 5,956,959 -355,041

Enduring 5,210,000 5,241,885 5,445,959 235,959

Overseas Contingency Operations 1,102,000 1,102,000 511,000 -591,000

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175).

The FY 2014 enduring request for Foreign Military Financing (FMF) of $5,446 million furthers 

U.S. interests around the world by ensuring that Coalition partners and friendly foreign governments are 

equipped and trained to work toward common security goals and share burdens in joint missions. FMF 

promotes U.S. national security by contributing to regional and global stability, strengthening military 

support for democratically-elected governments, and containing transnational threats including terrorism 

and trafficking in narcotics, weapons, and persons. Increased military capabilities establish and 

strengthen multilateral coalitions with the United States, and enable friends and allies to be increasingly 

interoperable with U.S., regional, and international military forces. FMF assistance also supports 

ongoing efforts to incorporate the most recent North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) members into 

the organization, support prospective NATO members and Coalition partners, and assist critical Coalition 

partners in Afghanistan. 

The FY 2014 FMF request maintains prior-year assistance levels for Israel, Egypt, and Jordan, and 

continues the planned reduction in funding for Iraq, which is detailed in the Overseas Contingency 

Operations (OCO) section. In addition, the request supports funding for Coalition partners and allies, 

and is consistent with other requirements to promote U.S. national security, fight extremism, secure peace 

in the Middle East, and to increase our focus on Asia. 

Highlights:

• Near East ($4,840 million): The majority of FY 2014 FMF funding will provide continued 

assistance to the Middle East and North Africa region, including support for Israel in accordance with 

the Memorandum of Understanding; support for Jordan's force modernization, border surveillance, 

and counterterrorism efforts; and programs that consolidate gains in the development of 

counterterrorism capabilities and professional militaries. The U.S. Government expects to continue 

its ongoing assistance to Egypt in order to maintain the security pillar that is a cornerstone of 

U.S. regional strategic interests, and to continue programs that foster a disciplined, well-trained 

Egyptian military that is respectful of human rights and capable of securing its borders from terrorists 

and illicit trafficking. Funds will also provide an incentive for the government of Lebanon to uphold 

its international obligations. Since the political situation in the Middle East and North Africa 

remains fluid, longer-term specifics of the program will be reviewed in light of changing 

circumstances. 

• South and Central Asia ($311.3 million): The FY 2014 request includes $300 million to support 

Pakistan’s security forces by providing equipment and training to enhance their counterterrorism and 

counterinsurgency capabilities. Elsewhere in the region, assistance will build border and maritime 

security and counterterrorism capabilities.

123
• Europe and Eurasia ($86.6 million): In Europe and Eurasia, FMF assistance furthers defense 

reform, military modernization, and interoperability of recipient country armed forces with the 

United States and NATO. A key focus of the program is supporting Coalition partners, including 

Poland, Georgia, Romania, and Bulgaria, to enable the recipients to undertake overseas deployments 

and peacekeeping missions, lessening the burden on U.S. forces.

 

• East Asia and the Pacific ($72.5 million): Assistance will meet security challenges by enhancing 

ties with allies and partners. Programs will support the Administration’s rebalance towards Asia by 

demonstrating U.S. commitment to priority regional security concerns of maritime security and 

disaster relief, enabling troop-contributing countries to participate in peacekeeping and coalition 

operations, increasing educational opportunities and English language capacity in support of deeper 

partnership with the United States, developing mutual understanding, and building the 

professionalization of partner nations’ security forces, including strengthening democratic values and 

human rights. 

• Western Hemisphere ($60.2 million): FMF in the Western Hemisphere supports our partners' 

efforts to control national territory, modernize defense forces, and secure the southern approaches to 

the United States. FMF will continue to support Colombia’s efforts to ensure that their security 

gains are irreversible and support the transition of our relationship toward that of a strategic 

partnership. FMF will also support Mexico’s efforts to control national territory, enhance 

cooperation with the U.S., and support maritime and related security efforts of partner nations in the 

Caribbean through the Caribbean Basin Security Initiative. Additionally, increased FMF funding to 

Central America will support partner efforts to control their national territory and maritime borders, 

denying safe haven and operating areas to transnational criminal organizations and others who drive 

violence that threatens the security of our partners. 

• Africa ($15.3 million): In Africa, assistance will support defense reform, enhance counterterrorism 

capabilities, promote interoperability, and expand recipient countries’ capacity to participate in 

peacekeeping operations.

Details of the FY 2014 OCO Request for FMF are addressed in the OCO chapter.

124
Global Security Contingency Fund

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Global Security Contingency Fund 23,000 - 25,000 2,000

Enduring - - 25,000 25,000

Overseas Contingency Operations 23,000 - - -23,000

1/ FY 2012 OCO Actual level reflects the transfer of $23 million from the Pakistan Counterinsurgency Capability Fund to the Global Security 

Contingency Fund. 

The FY 2014 request of $25 million for the Global Security Contingency Fund will be the third year of 

the three year pilot initiative, started in FY 2012, to streamline the way the U.S. Government provides 

assistance to enhance the capabilities of military forces and other security forces responsible for 

conducting border and maritime security, internal security, and counterterrorism operations, as well as the 

government agencies responsible for such forces, in response to emergent challenges or opportunities. 

The Fund is intended to strategically address changing, transnational, asymmetric threats, and emergent 

security, political, and economic challenges and opportunities. The Fund can also provide support to the 

justice sector (including law enforcement and prisons), rule of law programs, and stabilization efforts 

where the Secretary of State determines, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, that conflict or 

instability challenges civilian providers to deliver such assistance. Programs under this Fund are jointly 

developed and funded by the Department of State and the Department of Defense, and implemented 

primarily by these agencies, the U.S. Agency for International Development, or the most appropriate 

U.S. government agency. 

125
Special Defense Acquisition Fund

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Special Defense Acquisition Fund 100,000 100,000 100,000 -

Foreign Military Sales Trust Fund offset -100,000 - - -

Offsetting Collections - -100,000 -100,000 -

Net Cost for Special Defense Acquisition Fund - - - -

The Special Defense Acquisition Fund (SDAF) will allow the United States to better support coalition 

and other partners, including those participating in U.S. overseas contingency and other operations, by 

expediting the procurement of defense articles for provision to foreign nations and international 

organizations. 

The FY 2014 request reflects an additional $100 million in new SDAF obligation authority to be funded 

by offsetting collections. In FY 2014, offsetting collections will be derived from SDAF sales of stock as 

well as other receipts consistent with section 51(b) of the Arms Export Control Act. The FY 2014 

request will support advance purchases of high-demand warfighter support equipment that have long 

procurement lead times. Long procurement lead times are often the main limiting factor in our ability to 

provide coalition partners with critical equipment to make them operationally effective in a timely 

manner. Improving the mechanism for supporting U.S. partners is a high priority for the Departments of 

State and Defense.

126
Multilateral Assistance

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Multilateral Assistance 2,966,293 2,989,277 3,196,424 230,131

International Organizations and Programs2 343,905 350,839 320,645 -23,260

International Development Association 1,325,000 1,333,109 1,358,500 33,500

International Bank for Reconstruction and 

Development

117,364 118,083 186,957 69,593

Global Environment Facility3 89,820 90,370 143,750 53,930

African Development Fund 172,500 173,556 195,000 22,500

African Development Bank 32,418 32,616 32,418 -

Asian Development Fund 100,000 100,612 115,250 15,250

Asian Development Bank 106,586 107,238 106,586 -

Inter-American Development Bank 75,000 75,459 102,020 27,020

Enterprise of the Americas Multilateral 

Investment Fund

25,000 25,153 6,298 -18,702

Inter-American Investment Corporation 4,670 4,699 - -4,670

European Bank for Reconstruction and 

Development - - - -

Global Agriculture and Food Security Program4 135,000 135,826 135,000 -

International Fund for Agricultural 

Development

30,000 30,184 30,000 -

Clean Technology Fund3 184,630 185,760 215,700 31,070

Strategic Climate Fund3 49,900 50,205 68,000 18,100

IDA Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative 167,000 168,022 145,300 -21,700

AfDF Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative 7,500 7,546 30,000 22,500

Middle East and North Africa Transition Fund - - 5,000 5,000

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175).

2/ The FY 2012 Actual reflects the transfer of $4.8 million from the International Organizations and Programs account to the Global Health 

Programs-USAID account.

3/ FY 2012 Actual excludes the transfer of $100 million from the Economic Support Fund for the Global Environment Facility ($30 million), 

the Clean Technology Fund ($45 million), and the Strategic Climate Fund ($25 million).

4/ FY 2012 Actual excludes the transfer of $25 million from the Development Assistance account for the Global Agriculture and Food Security 

Program. 

127
International Organizations and Programs (IO&P) 

The FY 2014 request of $320.6 million for the International Organizations and Programs (IO&P) account 

will advance U.S. strategic goals across a broad spectrum of critical areas by supporting and enhancing 

international coordination, as well as leveraging resources from other countries. From this account, the 

United States provides voluntary contributions to international organizations to accomplish transnational 

goals where solutions to problems can best be addressed globally, such as protecting the ozone layer or 

safeguarding international air traffic. In other areas, such as development programs, the United States 

can multiply the influence and effectiveness of its own assistance through support for international 

programs. 

 

Highlights:

• United Nations Children’s Fund ($125 million): U.S. voluntary contributions support the core 

budget of the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), which provides goods and services directly 

to the world’s neediest children, and contributes to the development of local institutional capacity. 

UNICEF’s development work is closely coordinated with that of U.S. Government and international 

development agencies.

• United Nations Development Program ($67 million): U.S. voluntary contributions are provided 

for the United Nations Development Program (UNDP)’s regular budget, which supports its core 

administrative functions, basic development programming, and specific trust funds targeted in the 

areas of democratic governance and crisis prevention and recovery.

• United Nations Population Fund ($37 million): The United States continues to support the United 

Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). Contributions to UNFPA bolster the Fund’s continued efforts to 

reduce poverty, improve the health of women and children, prevent HIV/AIDS, and provide family 

planning assistance to women in over 150 countries. 

• UN Women ($7.5 million): Created in 2010, the UN Entity for Gender Equality and Women’s 

Empowerment (UN Women) works to increase women’s political participation, expand women’s 

economic and educational opportunities, reduce violence against women, improve women’s health, 

protect the rights of indigenous women and women with disabilities, facilitate women’s political 

participation in all aspects of peace and security, and counter discrimination against women. This 

contribution to the core resources of UN Women will support programs and enable policies and 

programs related to women to be developed and implemented more efficiently.

• International Conservation Programs ($7 million): The United States is invested in several 

treaties on conservation. One of the key initiatives supported through the U.S. contribution to 

International Conservation Programs is the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species 

of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). Other initiatives include the UN Convention to Combat 

Desertification, Ramsar Convention on Wetlands, the newly established Intergovernmental Platform 

for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), UN Forum on Forests, International Tropical 

Timber Organization, and the FAO National Forest Program Facility. 

• Multilateral Action Initiative ($1 million): This initiative will allow for timely funding of 

voluntary contributions to support specific multilateral activities in order to address priority and 

emerging needs that were not known or did not exist at the time of the Budget submission. The 

primary aim of this initiative is to allow the United States to fund responses to unanticipated peace 

and security challenges and other crises, as well as spur innovation and reform in multilateral 

organizations through timely seed money. 

128
Multilateral Development Banks

The FY 2014 Request for the multilateral development banks (MDBs) is comprised almost entirely of 

annual commitments negotiated and authorized in previous years. These include a continuation of the 

capital increases at the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), the 

Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), the African Development Bank (AfDB), and the Asian 

Development Bank (AsDB). Investments in multilateral institutions remain a cost-effective way to 

promote U.S. national security, support broad-based and sustainable economic growth, and address key 

global challenges like environmental degradation, while fostering private sector development and 

entrepreneurship. Continued support preserves U.S. leadership at the MDBs—leadership that has greatly 

benefited both the MDBs and U.S. taxpayers for more than 60 years. 

Treasury’s Request includes funding for the concessional windows at the MDBs that support the world’s 

poorest countries. MDB concessional facilities are an important source of financing for development 

needs in many of the world’s most fragile and post-conflict states. The projects they support help save 

lives by combating extreme hunger and poverty while promoting global stability, prosperity, and private 

sector growth. The FY 2014 Request includes funding for the third and final installment of the sixteenth 

replenishment of the International Development Association (IDA) and the third and final installment of 

the twelfth replenishment of African Development Fund (AfDF). In addition, Treasury is requesting 

funding that will both meet the U.S. commitment to the first installment of the tenth replenishment of the 

Asian Development Fund (AsDF) and clear a portion of U.S. arrears at the AsDF, which currently total 

over $326 million. Treasury’s Request also includes $6.3 million to clear a portion of the outstanding 

U.S. arrears to the Multilateral Investment Fund (MIF). 

Food Security 

The FY 2014 Request includes $135 million for a contribution to the Global Agriculture and Food 

Security Program (GAFSP). Investments made by GAFSP continue to make major strides in improving 

agricultural development in countries seeking to reduce food insecurity. In 18 countries, smallholder 

farmers have seen significant increases in productivity on a per hectare basis with corresponding income 

gains. In Haiti, farmers have more than doubled their yields; in Bangladesh, farmers have had their 

first-ever surplus of rice. GAFSP is responsive to country needs and is aligned with their own home 

grown strategies. It fosters cooperation among donors and allocates resources based on results. 

The food security budget also includes $30 million for the second of three installments for the ninth 

replenishment of the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), the only global 

development finance institution solely dedicated to improving food security for the rural poor. This 

request is equivalent to our annual commitment under the previous replenishment, made in 2008. 

Environment and Clean Energy 

The FY 2014 Request includes $427.5 million for the Global Environment Facility (GEF), the Clean 

Technology Fund (CTF), and three programs supported by the Strategic Climate Fund (SCF): The Pilot 

Program for Climate Resilience (PPCR), the Forest Investment Program (FIP), and the Program for 

Scaling up Renewable Energy in Low-Income Countries (SREP). FY 2014 funding for Treasury’s 

multilateral environment and clean energy programs will spur direct action and investment by other 

countries to reduce their own pollution sources and advance ongoing efforts. These global actions 

mitigate threats to our domestic environment that increasingly originate beyond our own borders, 

enhancing our national security and providing opportunities for U.S. businesses, especially in clean 

energy.

129
The U.S. contribution leverages significant funding from other donors, developing country governments, 

development institutions, and the private sector. Each U.S. dollar contributed to the GEF, CTF, and SCF 

leverages four to five additional dollars from other donors and six to ten times that from other funding 

sources—including the private sector.

Debt Relief

The FY 2014 Request includes $175.3 million to meet a portion of the U.S. commitment to the 

Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative (MDRI) at IDA and the AfDF under the current replenishment cycles. 

MDRI, together with associated debt relief efforts, reduced the debt burden for participating countries by 

about 90 percent as compared to the debt levels existing prior to entering the debt relief process. As a 

result, these countries have been able to increase poverty-reducing expenditures by an average of more 

than three percentage points of GDP over the past ten years.

Middle East and North Africa Transition Fund 

The FY 2014 Request includes $5 million for the Middle East and North Africa Transition Fund, a new 

multi-donor trust fund administered by the World Bank. This fund was created under the 

U.S. chairmanship of the Group of 7 to assist Arab countries that are members of the Deauville 

Partnership with Arab Countries in Transition (currently Egypt, Tunisia, Jordan, Morocco, Libya, and 

Yemen) as they address their diverse economic challenges during their political transitions. The fund 

provides quick dispensation for small grants to help countries put in place economic policies and 

government reforms that will allow them to attract greater flows of capital. A wide range of countries 

have already provided or committed to provide funding, including the United Kingdom, Saudi Arabia, 

Canada, France, Japan, Russia, Kuwait, and Qatar. 

International Monetary Fund

Treasury is seeking legislation within its FY 2014 Budget Request for the International Monetary Fund 

(IMF). G-20 leaders and the IMF membership reached agreement at the 2010 Seoul Summit on a set of 

IMF quota and governance reforms designed to enhance IMF effectiveness. The U.S. successfully 

achieved its negotiating priorities: (1) a U.S. quota increase with a corresponding roll back in our 

participation in the IMF’s New Arrangements to Borrow (NAB); and, (2) preservation of U.S. veto power 

in the IMF.

Legislation is needed to increase the U.S. quota in the IMF by approximately $63 billion and 

simultaneously reduce by an equal amount U.S. participation in the NAB. This action results in no 

overall change in U.S. financial participation in the IMF. The legislation is also necessary to allow the 

U.S. to accept an amendment to the IMF Articles of Agreement facilitating changes in the composition of 

the IMF Executive Board while preserving the U.S. board seat.

 

Since its inception, the IMF has been a critical tool for the U.S. in promoting global financial stability. 

The IMF supports U.S. jobs, exports, and financial markets. During crises abroad, the U.S. leverages the 

IMF to protect our domestic economy. 

As the world’s largest economy, the U.S. is the only country with a veto to shape major IMF governance 

and resource decisions. As emerging economies play a bigger role and seek greater influence, it is 

critical that the U.S. maintains its influence in the global economy in the coming years. This requires 

ensuring the IMF remains the leading first responder with adequate quota resources and that the 

U.S. continues to preserve its veto power. Unless the U.S. acts now to honor its IMF commitments, we 

130
risk jeopardizing our leadership position.

Finally, the IMF is a safe and smart investment, with a rock solid balance sheet including reserves and 

gold holdings that exceed total IMF credit outstanding (about $140 billion). The IMF has never 

defaulted on any U.S. reserve claims on the IMF since its inception nearly 70 years ago.

The required authorization requests, including for mandatory funding for the IMF quota increase and 

NAB rollback, will be submitted separately. The proposal has an assumed enactment date in fiscal year 

2013. The net cost of the proposed IMF legislation is zero, both in terms of budget authority and outlays. 

131
Export-Import Bank of the United States

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Export-Import Bank of the United States -799,700 -752,925 -831,600 -31,900

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175).

The FY 2014 Budget estimates that the Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank) export 

credit support will total $42.7 billion in lending activity, and will be funded entirely by receipts collected 

from the Ex-Im Bank’s customers. These receipts are expected to total $972.1 million in excess of 

estimated losses in FY 2014. These funds, treated as offsetting collections, will be used to pay $114.9 

million for administrative expenses. The administrative expenses estimate includes funding to meet the 

increased demand for services; for significant improvements to outreach and business development 

initiatives to increase the number of small business that export; for enhancing the Bank's underwriting and 

monitoring capabilities; and to upgrade the Bank’s antiquated systems infrastructure. The Bank forecasts 

a net return of $832 million to the U.S. Treasury as receipts in excess of expenses or negative subsidy. 

The FY 2014 request for the Ex-Im Bank includes $4.6 million for the expenses of the Inspector General. 

The Ex-Im Bank is an independent, self-sustaining executive agency, and a wholly-owned 

U.S. Government corporation. As the official export credit agency of the United States, the mission of 

the Ex-Im Bank is to support U.S. exports by providing export financing through its loan, guarantee, and 

insurance programs. These programs are implemented in cases where the private sector is unable or 

unwilling to provide financing, and to ensure equitable competition in export sales between 

U.S. exporters and foreign exporters financed by their respective governments. By facilitating the 

financing of U.S. exports, Ex-Im Bank helps companies support and maintain U.S. jobs. The Ex-Im 

Bank actively assists small and medium sized businesses.

132
Overseas Private Investment Corporation

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Overseas Private Investment Corporation -265,734 -203,573 -198,200 67,534

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175).

As the U.S. Government's development finance institution, the Overseas Private Investment Corporation 

(OPIC) is a critical development tool in fulfilling the President’s national security, diplomacy and 

development commitments globally. OPIC mobilizes private capital and skills to help solve critical 

development challenges and in doing so, advances U.S. foreign policy. Because OPIC works with the 

U.S. private sector, it helps U.S. businesses gain footholds in emerging markets, catalyzing revenues, jobs 

and growth opportunities both at home and abroad. OPIC achieves its mission by providing investors 

with financing, guarantees, political risk insurance, and support for private equity investment funds. 

OPIC's FY 2014 budget is fully self-funded and continues OPIC's thirty-five year consecutive 

track-record of positive contributions to the budget. From its FY 2014 estimated net offsetting 

collections, OPIC is requesting $71.8 million for administrative expenses and $31.0 million for credit 

subsidy. For every dollar of OPIC administrative resources, OPIC has historically made $151 in loans 

and guarantees; and in FY2014, we expect these resources will support up to $5.7 billion in new direct 

loans, risk insurance and loan guarantees and result in offsetting collections of over $300 million. 

The requested resources, sourced from OPIC's own balances, are integral to OPIC's ability to continue to 

be a leading contributor to some of the most pressing policy priorities of the Administration. We 

anticipate that additional budget resources will be applied primarily to staff to: (a) help fill the President’s 

and the Secretary of State's combined $3 billion pledge of OPIC support to the Middle East and North 

Africa; (b) meet the Administration’s increased focus on development priorities in Sub-Saharan Africa, 

particularly in the energy and infrastructure sectors; and (c) fulfill OPIC’s pledge under the 

recently-announced US-Asia Pacific Comprehensive Partnership For a Sustainable Energy Future.

• OPIC Delivers on U.S. Foreign Policy Priorities – OPIC plays a critical role in fulfilling the 

President’s commitments to economic reconstruction in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Haiti, supporting the 

economic development of the Middle East and North Africa, and in other key initiatives such as the 

U.S.-Asia Pacific Comprehensive Partnership For a Sustainable Energy, the Global Climate Change 

Initiative, Feed the Future, and the Partnership for Growth. 

• OPIC is Key Contributor of the USG response to Renewable Energy and Climate Change in 

Emerging Markets –OPIC’s annual commitments to renewable energy projects grew ten-fold in 

three years to over $1 billion, and accounts for approximately one-third of the U.S. Government’s 

international climate finance commitments. 

• OPIC Supports Small Businesses – Nearly two-thirds of OPIC projects last fiscal year were in 

support of small and medium sized enterprises, which have strong growth and employment potential. 

• OPIC Operates on a Self-Sustaining Basis and Has a History of Contributing to Deficit 

Reduction – OPIC operates at no net cost to the American taxpayer, and has returned money to the 

U.S. Treasury for each of the past 35 years. 

133
OPIC has a long history of catalyzing private sector investment which is critical to stabilizing economies 

following political turmoil and laying the groundwork for growth, jobs and opportunities. By balancing 

risks, returns and resources, OPIC generates returns to the budget, maintains itself as a fully 

self-sustaining Federal Corporation and has contributed to deficit reduction. 

134
U.S. Trade and Development Agency

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

U.S. Trade and Development Agency 50,000 50,306 62,662 12,662

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175).

The FY 2014 request for the U.S. Trade and Development Agency (USTDA) of $62.6 million will enable 

the Agency to continue its mission to help U.S. companies create jobs through the export of U.S. goods 

and services for priority development projects in emerging economies. USTDA links U.S. businesses to 

export opportunities by funding project planning activities, pilot projects, and reverse trade missions that 

create sustainable infrastructure and economic growth in its partner countries. In carrying out its 

mission, USTDA places particular emphasis on activities where there is a high likelihood for the export of 

U.S. goods and services during project implementation. 

USTDA programs have a proven record of success. In FY 2012, USTDA identified over $2.2 billion in 

exports that were attributable to its activities. During the most recent ten-year evaluations period, the 

Ten Year Rolling Average currently consists of all USTDA activities completed between years 

2000-2009. Due to the nature of USTDA’s early project planning and development funding, this interval 

of time is used to capture a meaningful and relevant representation of the results of USTDA’s program 

funds. USTDA’s programs have generated over $63 in U.S. exports for every program dollar obligated 

by the Agency.

The FY 2014 budget request represents an increase of $5 million over the Administration’s FY 2013 

request for USTDA. This increase will allow USTDA to fill critical project development gaps that the 

Agency has identified which are impeding implementation of critical infrastructure projects overseas. 

The additional funds will enable USTDA to offer specialized assistance to help fill these gaps for 

meritorious projects through: (1) advisory assistance services to create the necessary legal and 

regulatory infrastructure to support private sector participation in various sectors to host countries, and to 

assist prospective project sponsors in complying with requirements of financial institutions to help move 

projects to successful implementation; and (2) engineering and design studies and impact assessments 

necessary to bring projects to financial closure. 

USTDA will continue to prioritize support for projects in emerging economies in the energy, 

transportation, information and communications technology, and environmental sectors where its 

assistance can be most impactful for U.S. companies and partner countries. Key markets USTDA will 

target include Brazil, China, Colombia, Ghana, India, Indonesia, Mexico, the Philippines, South Africa, 

Turkey, and Vietnam. 

More broadly, USTDA’s FY 2014 budget will support key U.S. policy objectives including, generating 

economic growth and jobs at home while promoting investments in “smart” development to ensure 

long-term sustainability in emerging economies. USTDA has a demonstrated capability to respond 

rapidly and effectively to U.S. foreign policy priorities that promote economic development overseas 

while creating export opportunities for U.S. companies. USTDA’s strategic use of foreign assistance 

funds to support sound investment decisions in host countries creates an enabling environment for 

sustainable economic development. 

135
International Trade Commission

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

International Trade Commission 80,000 80,490 85,102 5,102

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175).

The International Trade Commission (ITC) is an independent, nonpartisan, Federal agency with a wide 

range of trade-related mandates. The ITC makes determinations with respect to unfair trade practices in 

import trade, as well as conducting import-injury investigations. It also conducts economic research and 

fact-finding investigations of trade issues, and provides technical information and advice on trade matters 

to the Congress and the Administration. 

The FY 2014 request of $85.1 million will fund activities related to these mandates. 

136
Foreign Claims Settlement Commission

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Foreign Claims Settlement Commission 2,000 2,012 2,218 218

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175).

The Foreign Claims Settlement Commission (FCSC) is a quasi-judicial, independent agency within the 

Department of Justice. Its principle mission is to adjudicate claims of U.S. nationals against foreign 

governments, under specific jurisdiction conferred by Congress, pursuant to international claims 

settlement agreements, or at the request of the Secretary of State.

The FY 2014 request for FCSC provides $2.2 million to continue evaluating claims of U.S. nationals 

against foreign governments under current claims programs as well as maintaining the decisions and 

records of past claims programs, and continue building and modernizing both current and past claims 

programs records by creating and updating the relevant databases.

137
McGovern-Dole International Food for Education and Child Nutrition 

Program

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

McGovern-Dole International Food for Education 

and Child Nutrition Program

184,000 185,126 185,126 1,126

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175).

The FY 2014 request for the McGovern-Dole International Food for Education and Child Nutrition 

Program is $185.1 million. The Department of Agriculture (USDA) administers this program. With 

these funds USDA will provide the donation of U.S. agricultural commodities and associated technical 

and financial assistance to carry out pre-school and primary-school feeding programs in foreign countries 

in order to improve food security, reduce the incidence of hunger and malnutrition, and improve literacy 

and primary education. The program also supports maternal, infant, and child nutrition programs for 

pregnant and nursing women, infants, and pre-school children. 

 

138
FY 2014 INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS 

OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(OCO)

139
FY 2012 

Actual OCO

FY 2013 CR 

OCO1

FY 2014 

Request OCO

Change from FY 

2012 CR to FY 

2014 Request

OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS (OCO) TOTAL - 

STATE OPERATIONS and FOREIGN ASSISTANCE 11,202,787 11,202,787 3,807,341 (7,428,446)

STATE OPERATIONS - OCO 4,627,457 4,627,457 1,499,141 (3,161,316)

Administration of Foreign Affairs 4,614,646 4,614,646 1,499,141 (3,148,505)

 State Programs 4,306,364 4,389,064 1,199,491 (3,106,873)

 Diplomatic and Consular Programs2 4,306,364 4,389,064 1,199,491 (3,106,873)

 Ongoing Operations 4,070,163 4,152,863 808,530 (3,261,633)

 Worldwide Security Protection 236,201 236,201 390,961 154,760

 Embassy Security, Construction, and Maintenance2 115,700 33,000 250,000 -

 Ongoing Operations 115,700 33,000 250,000 134,300

 Worldwide Security Upgrades - - - -

 Other Administration of Foreign Affairs 91,282 91,282 49,650 (41,632)

 Conflict Stabilization Operations (CSO) 8,500 8,500 - (8,500)

 Office of the Inspector General 67,182 67,182 49,650 (17,532)

 Educational and Cultural Exchange Programs 15,600 15,600 - (15,600)

International Organizations 101,300 101,300 - (101,300)

 Contributions to International Organizations (CIO) 101,300 101,300 - (101,300)

Broadcasting Board of Governors 4,400 4,400 - (4,400)

 International Broadcasting Operations 4,400 4,400 - (4,400)

Other Programs 8,411 8,411 - (8,411)

 United States Institute of Peace 8,411 8,411 - (8,411)

FOREIGN OPERATIONS - OCO 6,575,330 6,575,330 2,308,200 (4,267,130)

U.S Agency for International Development - OCO 259,500 259,500 71,000 (188,500)

 USAID Operating Expenses (OE) 255,000 255,000 71,000 (184,000)

 USAID Inspector General Operating Expenses 4,500 4,500 - (4,500)

Bilateral Economic Assistance - OCO 3,834,516 3,177,016 1,382,200 (2,452,316)

 International Disaster Assistance (IDA)3 270,000 150,000 - (270,000)

 Transition Initiatives (TI)4 43,554 6,554 - (43,554)

 Complex Crises Fund (CCF)3 40,000 30,000 - (40,000)

 Economic Support Fund (ESF)3, 4, 5 3,151,962 2,761,462 1,382,200 (1,769,762)

 Migration and Refugee Assistance (MRA)3 329,000 229,000 - (329,000)

Department of Treasury 1,552 1,552 - (1,552)

 Treasury Technical Assistance 1,552 1,552 - (1,552)

STATE OPERATIONS and FOREIGN ASSISTANCE REQUEST

OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS (OCO)

($000)
FY 2012 

Actual OCO

FY 2013 CR 

OCO1

FY 2014 

Request OCO

Change from FY 

2012 CR to FY 

2014 Request

STATE OPERATIONS and FOREIGN ASSISTANCE REQUEST

OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS (OCO)

($000)

International Security Assistance - OCO 2,479,762 3,137,262 855,000 (1,624,762)

 International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement (INCLE)4, 5 574,605 983,605 344,000 (230,605)

 Nonproliferation, Antiterrorism, Demining and Related Programs (NADR)4 121,157 120,657 - (121,157)

 Peacekeeping Operations (PKO)3, 4 207,000 81,000 - (207,000)

 Foreign Military Financing (FMF) 1,102,000 1,102,000 511,000 (591,000)

 Pakistan Counterinsurgency Capability Fund (PCCF)3 452,000 800,000 - (452,000)

 Global Security Contingency Fund3 23,000 50,000 - (23,000)

Footnotes

5/ The FY 2012 OCO Actual level reflects the transfer of $10 million from the Economic Support Fund to the International Narcotics Control 

and Law Enforcement account.

4/ The FY 2012 OCO Actual level reflects the transfer of $409 million from the International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement account 

to the Economic Support Fund ($285.5 million), Transition Initiatives ($37 million), Nonproliferation, Antiterrorism, Demining and Related 

Programs ($0.5 million), Peacekeeping Operations ($86 million) accounts.

2/ The FY 2012 Actual includes the transfer of $82.7 million from Diplomatic and Consular Programs OCO funds for the Embassy Compound 

in Baghdad. 

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175).

3/ The FY 2012 OCO Actual level reflects the transfer of $398 million from the Pakistan Counterinsurgency Capability Fund to the Economic 

Support Fund ($105 million), Global Security Contingency Fund ($23 million), Complex Crises Fund ($10 million), Peacekeeping Operations 

($40 million), International Disaster Assistance ($120 million) and Migration and Refugee Assistance ($100 million) accounts.
Overseas Contingency Operations Overview

The Administration’s FY 2014 International Affairs request includes $3.8 billion for Overseas 

Contingency Operations (OCO). This title funds the extraordinary, but temporary, costs of the 

Department of State and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) operations primarily in 

the Frontline States of Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan. This approach, similar to the Department of 

Defense request, allows the Department and USAID to clearly identify the exceptional costs of operating 

in these countries that are focal points of U.S national security policy and require a significant 

U.S. civilian presence. In addition, it separates OCO costs from the permanent base requirements in the 

Frontline States, which will endure after OCO funding is phased out. In FY 2014, OCO funds will 

continue to support a sovereign, stable, and self-reliant Iraq, while normalizing Mission Baghdad 

operations. In Afghanistan, OCO funds will provide resources for the final stages of military-to-civilian 

transition and programs that will create the long-term stability for that nation. In Pakistan, the Department 

will continue to disrupt violent groups that destabilize the region while strengthening Pakistan’s resolve to 

combat these issues. 

142
Diplomatic and Consular Programs - OCO

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Diplomatic and Consular Programs 4,306,364 4,389,064 1,199,491 -3,106,873

Ongoing Operations 4,070,163 4,152,863 808,530 -3,261,633

Worldwide Security Protection 236,201 236,201 390,961 154,760

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175).

The FY 2014 Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) request for Diplomatic and Consular Programs 

(D&CP) totals $1.2 billion. The D&CP OCO funding addresses the extraordinary and temporary costs of 

diplomatic operations in the Frontline States of Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan. This funding is critical to 

achieving U.S. national security goals of the highest priority: establishing a secure, stable, democratic, 

and self-reliant Iraq that will change the strategic landscape of the Middle East, defeating al-Qaida and its 

associates in Afghanistan while supporting the transition to full Afghan lead for security, and working to 

eliminate terrorist safe havens in Pakistan. 

D&CP - Ongoing Operations 

In Iraq, OCO funding of $647.2 million in Ongoing Operations supports the U.S. Mission’s strategic 

partnership with Iraq, through which the United States can advance its economic and security interests in 

the region. Iraq is now a key U.S. ally in the region. Since the December 2011 departure of U.S. combat 

forces, the U.S. Mission in Iraq is now the foundation for all U.S. government programs and efforts. The 

D&CP Ongoing Operations request will support staff and activities at Embassy Baghdad, as well as 

consulates in Erbil and Basrah. The Department is normalizing its presence in Iraq to achieve a more 

flexible, less visible footprint. As a result, the request is $2.4 billion lower than the FY 2012 actual level, 

reflecting reductions in equipment, supplies and personnel; costs savings on life support and security 

contracts; and greater cost sharing from other agencies. 

In Afghanistan, FY 2014 OCO funding of $126.1 million supports the ongoing and accelerating shift 

from military to civilian lead. The $707.9 million reduction from FY 2012 in Ongoing Operations request 

includes lower costs for IT, aviation, and facilities. Department personnel are engaged in capacity 

building, stabilization, and development programs that are essential to strengthening the ability of 

Afghanistan to take full responsibility for its security and growth. The Department more than tripled the 

number of civilians in recent years, and D&CP funds support their work in key areas such as agriculture, 

rule of law, border issues, women’s rights, and governance. However, as security transition to Afghan 

lead occurs in the provinces, the Department is decreasing its civilian personnel numbers, resulting in 

savings on operating and staffing costs. 

In Pakistan, OCO funding of $35.2 million in Ongoing Operations, a $54.2 million reduction from the 

FY 2012 actual level, addresses the costs associated with supporting a robust diplomatic presence that 

will help create a durable stability in this strategically important nation. Pakistan lies at the heart of the 

U.S. counterterrorism strategy, the peace process in Afghanistan, nuclear non-proliferation efforts, and 

economic integration in South and Central Asia. OCO resources will support critical U.S. activities such 

as sustaining close cooperation with Pakistan, ensuring the safety of Pakistani nuclear installations, 

working with Pakistan to facilitate the peace process in Afghanistan, and promoting improved relations 

with India. 

143
D&CP – Worldwide Security Protection

In Afghanistan, OCO funding of $371.9 million for Worldwide Security Protection (WSP) is an increase 

of $182.1 million from the FY 2012 actual level. This increase includes costs for general support 

operation expenses, equipment for the Tactical Operations Center, physical and technical security 

equipment such as Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, and regional security-related costs. 

In Pakistan, OCO funding of $19.1 million for WSP similarly provides for overseas protective operations 

of U.S. civilians at the Embassy and consulates. This level is $27.2 million below FY 2012, and includes 

lower costs for armored vehicles, a reduction in regional director costs, and lower costs to support 

Temporary Duty (TDY) personnel in Pakistan. 

There is no WSP OCO funding requested for operations in Iraq. Funding for Iraq operations is funded 

out of the D&CP two-year account and is reflected under the “ongoing operations” section above. 

144
Embassy Security, Construction and Maintenance - OCO

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual2/

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Embassy Security, Construction and Maintenance 115,700 33,000 250,000 134,300

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175).

2/FY 2012 Actual includes the transfer of $82.7 million from Diplomatic and Consular Programs OCO funds for the Embassy Compound in 

Baghdad. 

The Bureau of Overseas Buildings Operations (OBO), funded through the Embassy Security, 

Construction, and Maintenance (ESCM) appropriation, is responsible for providing U.S. Diplomatic and 

Consular missions overseas with secure, safe, and functional facilities to assist them in achieving the 

foreign policy objectives of the United States.

The FY 2014 Request represents an overall increase of $134 million over the FY 2012 Actual level. The 

funding covers costs for the construction of a new consulate compound in Erbil. Consulate General Erbil 

is a key to facilitating discussions between the federal government in Baghdad and the Kurdish Regional 

Government, and is instrumental to the preservation of a stable, unified Iraq. The Erbil project will 

include the construction of a new consulate office building, general services office/support buildings, 

consul general residence, recreational facilities, and parking and vehicular/pedestrian screening facilities.

145
Office of Inspector General - OCO

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Office of Inspector General 67,182 67,182 49,650 -17,532

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175).

The FY 2014 request of $49.7 million for the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction 

(SIGAR) will enable the organization to perform independent and objective oversight of reconstruction 

and security programs. SIGAR will continue to address emergent reconstruction issues, coordinate with 

experts from multiple SIGAR Directorates, and quickly address matters before they mature into 

significant issues that negatively impact the reconstruction. The overall request is a $17.5 million 

reduction from the FY12 actual level and reflects an increase of $5.2 million for SIGAR, and decreases of 

$19.5 million for the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction (SIGIR) and $3.3 million for the 

State Department’s OIG. The request shifts $3.3 million to OIG’s enduring funds, as well as increases the 

enduring request for the Middle East Regional Office (MERO) $1.9 million in anticipation of increased 

workload from SIGIR’s anticipated closure by the end of FY 2013. 

146
USAID Operating Expenses - OCO

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

USAID Operating Expenses 255,000 255,000 71,000 -184,000

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175).

The Quadrennial Diplomacy and Development Review calls for “elevating American ‘civilian power’ to 

better advance our national interests and be a better partner with the U.S. military.” The U.S. Agency for 

International Development (USAID) Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) Operating Expense (OE) 

request provides the resources to respond to this challenge. It funds the extraordinary costs of operations 

in the frontline state of Afghanistan.

For FY 2014, the $71 million USAID OCO OE request will cover the salaries and operational costs 

associated with approximately 112 of 267 personnel working on programs and activities deemed nonenduring for USAID operations in Afghanistan for FY 2014. 

147
Economic Support Fund - OCO

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Economic Support Fund2, 3 3,151,962 2,761,462 1,382,200 -1,769,762

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175).

2/ The FY 2012 OCO Actual level reflects the transfer of $105 million from the Pakistan Counterinsurgency Capability Fund and $285.5 million 

from the International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement account to the Economic Support Fund.

3/ The FY 2012 OCO Actual level reflects the transfer of $10 million from the Economic Support Fund to the International Narcotics Control 

and Law Enforcement account.

South and Central Asia – Overseas Contingency Operations ($1,382.2 million): The FY 2014 

request includes funding to support extraordinary and temporary needs that will help stabilize conflict 

areas and aid in the transition to long-term sustainable and durable development of Afghanistan and 

Pakistan.

• Afghanistan ($1,130 million): FY 2014 resources are necessary for the continued security transition 

and the Afghan Presidential election, perhaps the most critical phase of our engagement in 

Afghanistan. Continued, sustained support to Afghanistan throughout this period is essential to 

solidifying the progress made over the last decade and helping establish Afghanistan as a stable, 

prosperous, secure nation in a stable, prosperous, secure region. Support from the United States will 

help to ensure credible elections and a political transition in 2014 consistent with Afghanistan’s 

Constitution, and promote economic growth by improving the environment for investment and 

fostering links to regional economies. FY 2014 assistance will focus on promoting economic growth 

by investing in viable sectors including agriculture and extractives, improved governance, a better 

system of justice, and alternatives to the illicit production of narcotics. The United States will work 

with international partners to sustain gains in health and education and will expand support for 

women and girls through the critical transition period and beyond. The United States and the 

Government of Afghanistan are working together to make progress on the fundamental reforms 

objectives laid out in the Tokyo Mutual Accountability Framework. Assistance funds will help 

support progress in these areas and the United States is working in coordination with other major 

donors to create incentives for government enactment and implementation of reforms including 

respect for the rights of women and minorities, improved governance, anti-corruption efforts and 

improved legislation to support private investment. 

OCO resources in FY 2014 are essential to a successful ongoing security transition and to the 

continued stability of Afghanistan. They will be used to address stabilization needs as well as to 

solidify gains in areas still vulnerable to unrest. Infrastructure funding will help finalize and maintain 

investments in core projects that will bring sustainable power to the North and South – a critical 

component of the U.S. Government stabilization and economic growth strategies for Afghanistan. 

OCO funds will also support government reform efforts through the Afghan Reconstruction Trust 

Fund and through other programs. 

• Pakistan ($252.2 million): FY 2014 resources for Pakistan remains vital to achieving core 

U.S. national security objectives: defeating al-Qaida and its allies, enabling a responsible end to the 

conflict in Afghanistan, and promoting a stable, secure, and prosperous Pakistan. A stable Pakistan is 

148
especially important in FY 2014 as the United States continues to transition primary security 

responsibility in Afghanistan to Afghan forces. Civilian assistance directly supports U.S. goals by 

addressing the development priorities of the Pakistani people and their democratically-elected 

representatives, working to promote economic growth, energy security, health and education, and 

good governance, which will help build Pakistan’s security and stability over the long term. 

OCO resources will be used to support the continuing rehabilitation and reconstruction of roads, bridges, 

and other infrastructure and facilities that further both a short-term counterinsurgency strategy and longerterm economic and democratic development in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) and in 

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) province. With FY 2014 resources, these activities will be expanded to 

additional areas of instability, including Karachi, Northern Sindh, and Southern Punjab. These 

investments support development in conflict and post-conflict regions in order to help make these areas 

less hospitable to insurgents, while enabling the civilian government and Pakistani law enforcement to 

operate more effectively. 

149
International Narcotics and Law Enforcement - OCO

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

International Narcotics and Law Enforcement2 574,605 983,605 344,000 -230,605

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175).

2/ The FY 2012 OCO Actual reflects the transfer of $409 million from the International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement account to the 

Economic Support Fund ($285.5 million), Transition Initiatives ($37 million), Nonproliferation, Antiterrorism, Demining and Related Programs 

($0.5 million), and Peacekeeping Operations ($86 million) accounts.

The FY 2014 International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement (INCLE) request includes funding 

for Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) for Afghanistan and Pakistan. The request of $315 million 

for Afghanistan includes a full year of operations for the interdiction, justice, corrections, and various 

support programs in Afghanistan. The $29 million request for Pakistan will fund efforts to increase the 

reach of Pakistani law enforcement into the unstable areas bordering Afghanistan. 

FY 2014 OCO funds will support interventions to prepare Afghanistan’s civilian institutions to extend 

effective governance and provide credible security and rule of law as international troops draw down. 

The request for Administration of Justice funding will support activities where the Department of State 

had partnered with the U.S. military, such as providing justice training in the provinces. OCO funding 

will simultaneously prepare Afghan government justice institutions to assume responsibility for internal 

training and will support other capacity building programs in challenging areas deemed critical by joint 

civilian and military planners. Funding will promote citizens’ ability to demand individual and legal 

rights as a balance against large security and law enforcement sector expenditures, and will be particularly 

useful in funding defense lawyers to represent defendants being transitioned from military detention to the 

civilian justice system. Funding would be used to continue corrections training and capacity building 

efforts through the Corrections System Support Program. Funds would also support the General 

Directorate of Prisons and Detention Centers in developing prison industries and vocational programs, 

supporting vulnerable populations including juveniles, managing security threats, and with advisory and 

mentoring support. OCO funds will also enable sustainable renovations for security and humanitarian 

needs in provincial prisons and district detention facilities that are most at risk from the insurgency. 

 

Additionally, FY 2014 OCO funds will support drug supply reduction programs aimed at disrupting 

insurgents’ funding from the narcotics trade, while also building sustainable Afghan capacity to reduce 

opium poppy cultivation and to investigate and prosecute high-value drug traffickers. Funding will 

promote stabilization by incentivizing provincial governors’ counternarcotics and supply reduction 

activities, including through support for sustainable, community-led development projects in provinces 

that have successfully reduced or eliminated poppy cultivation. Funds will also support enhanced 

Counter Narcotics Police of Afghanistan (CNPA) mobility and deployment efforts to target the nexus of 

illicit narcotics funding and insurgency that poses a threat to the stability during transition. INL will 

continue a strong focus on capacity building efforts, especially in technical areas such as electronic 

surveillance and intelligence analysis.

For Pakistan, the request of $29 million in OCO funding will support law enforcement and border 

security efforts such as infrastructure projects and aviation support that strengthen the presence and 

operational capabilities of Pakistani law enforcement in the challenging terrain bordering Afghanistan. 

Specifically, funding will support the construction of outposts and border security roads in the Federally 

150
Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province to help extend the reach of law 

enforcement into typically inaccessible areas. Funds will also support the Ministry of Interior Air Wing 

which enhances law enforcement operations countrywide against traffickers, militants, and criminals.

151
Foreign Military Financing - OCO

($ in thousands) FY 2012 

Actual

FY 2013 

CR 1/

FY 2014 

Request

Increase / 

Decrease from 

FY 2012

Foreign Military Financing 1,102,000 1,102,000 511,000 -591,000

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175).

The FY 2014 Foreign Military Financing (FMF) Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) request is for 

Iraq. FMF OCO funding for Iraq in FY 2014 will continue to ensure the sustainment of advances that 

Iraq has made in assuming responsibility for its own security. 

The $511 million request will support the continued development and professionalization of the Iraqi 

military until the military becomes self-sufficient, and will provide an important vehicle for cementing the 

United States' enduring partnership with Iraq during an important period of transition. Of this amount, 

$11 million will support the administrative costs associated with this program to support the security 

assistance personnel at the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq.

The requested funding for FY 2014 broadly focuses on helping the Iraqis increase the capacity and 

professionalism of the Iraqi military and builds upon the efforts made since 2003 by the United States 

military, Coalition forces, and Iraqi military operations and initiatives. The FMF program will support 

the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq, and Iraq’s own significant purchases through the Foreign 

Military Sales program. It will also help ensure that a strong relationship is in place as Iraq continues to 

use its own fiscal resources to contribute to peace and security in the region. The program will focus on 

the development of enduring logistics capabilities and institutions to sustain U.S. and Iraqi post-war 

investments, professionalizing the security forces, and strengthening the United States' long-term strategic 

partnership with Iraq. 

152
APPENDIX: 

ACCOUNT TABLES 

153
FY 2012 

Actual1 FY 2013 CR2 FY 2014 

Request

TOTAL 2,629,800 2,641,065 2,645,000

 Africa 1,375,577 * 1,428,970

 Angola 40,500 * 38,700

 Benin 28,400 * 23,500

 Burkina Faso 9,000 * 9,000

 Burundi 16,560 * 16,500

 Cameroon 1,500 * 1,500

 Democratic Republic of the Congo 97,850 * 122,700

 Ethiopia 120,500 * 135,900

 Ghana 67,000 * 61,500

 Guinea 17,500 * 15,500

 Kenya 78,150 * 81,400

 Lesotho 6,400 * 6,400

 Liberia 30,700 * 30,700

 Madagascar 50,100 * 49,000

 Malawi 70,500 * 72,400

 Mali 59,650 * 56,850

 Mozambique 65,200 * 68,100

 Namibia 2,000 * -

 Nigeria 133,500 * 169,200

 Rwanda 42,100 * 43,000

 Senegal 53,950 * 55,400

 Somalia 1,550 * -

 South Africa 12,000 * 10,000

 South Sudan 43,010 * 35,510

 Swaziland 6,900 * 6,900

 Tanzania 98,100 * 97,135

 Uganda 81,250 * 86,100

 Zambia 57,075 * 56,875

 Zimbabwe 41,500 * 40,500

 Africa Regional (AFR) 17,686 * 13,500

 East Africa Regional 9,946 * 8,800

 Southern Africa Regional 2,000 * 2,000

 West Africa Regional 13,500 * 14,400

 East Asia and Pacific 138,350 * 131,250

 Burma 3,000 * 16,000

 Cambodia 32,500 * 30,500

 Indonesia 39,250 * 39,750

 Papua New Guinea 2,500 * 2,500

 Philippines 33,800 * 31,500

 Thailand 1,000 * -

 Timor-Leste 3,000 * 2,000

 Regional Development Mission-Asia (RDM/A) 23,300 * 9,000

 Europe and Eurasia 15,150 * 9,800

 Armenia - * -

 Georgia - * -

 Russia - * -

 Ukraine 4,400 * 7,500

Global Health Programs - USAID

($ in Thousands)

154
FY 2012 

Actual1 FY 2013 CR2 FY 2014 

Request

Global Health Programs - USAID

($ in Thousands)

 Eurasia Regional 10,750 * -

 Europe and Eurasia Regional - * 2,300

 Near East 7,989 * 9,500

 Yemen 7,989 * 9,500

 South and Central Asia 197,550 * 191,000

 Bangladesh 71,600 * 75,300

 India 76,000 * 61,500

 Kazakhstan 900 * -

 Kyrgyz Republic 3,200 * 3,750

 Nepal 38,500 * 39,700

 Tajikistan 3,350 * 6,750

 Uzbekistan 3,000 * 3,000

 Central Asia Regional 1,000 * 1,000

 Western Hemisphere 104,509 * 75,791

 Bolivia 14,100 * 7,500

 Dominican Republic 6,768 * 5,750

 Guatemala 17,600 * 14,000

 Haiti 25,000 * 25,200

 Honduras 8,000 * -

 Mexico 1,000 * -

 Nicaragua 2,900 * -

 Peru 5,000 * -

 Barbados and Eastern Caribbean 6,950 * 6,950

 Central America Regional 5,391 * 8,391

 Latin America and Caribbean Regional 7,800 * 4,000

 South America Regional 4,000 * 4,000

Asia Middle East Regional 5,500 * -

USAID Asia Regional - * 4,750

DCHA - Democracy, Conflict, and Humanitarian Assistance 15,000 * 13,000

 Special Protection and Assistance Needs of Survivors (SPANS) 15,000 * 13,000

GH - Global Health 770,175 - 780,939

 Global Health - Core 371,630 * 358,594

 Blind Children 2,500 * -

 Commodity Fund 20,335 * 20,335

 Global Alliance for Vaccine Immunization (GAVI) 130,000 * 175,000

 International AIDS Vaccine Initiative (IAVI) 28,710 * 28,710

 Iodine Deficiency Disorder (IDD) 2,000 * 2,000

 Microbicides 45,000 * 45,000

 Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTD) 89,000 * 85,000

 Pandemic Influenza and Other Emerging Threats 58,000 * 47,000

 TB Drug Facility 15,000 * 13,500

MDR Financing 5,000 * 3,000

New Partners Fund 3,000 * 2,800

2/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175).

1/ The FY 2012 Enduring Actual level reflects the transfer of $4.8 million from the International Organizations and Programs account to the 

Global Health Programs-USAID account.

155
FY 2012 

Actual FY 2013 CR1 FY 2014 Request

TOTAL 5,542,860 5,576,782 5,670,000

 Africa 2,993,255 * 3,205,656

 Angola 10,300 * 10,938

 Botswana 66,000 * 49,711

 Burundi 5,000 * 14,899

 Cameroon 11,250 * 23,107

 Cote d'Ivoire 118,305 * 121,390

 Democratic Republic of the Congo 13,770 * 38,332

 Djibouti 1,800 * 1,800

 Ethiopia 181,241 * 190,336

 Ghana 9,000 * 4,042

 Kenya 241,512 * 382,141

 Lesotho 9,235 * 19,158

 Liberia 800 * 800

 Madagascar 500 * -

 Malawi 51,448 * 56,248

 Mali 1,500 * 1,349

 Mozambique 224,239 * 249,180

 Namibia 88,809 * 60,675

 Nigeria 461,227 * 441,225

 Rwanda 99,072 * 74,202

 Senegal 1,535 * 1,535

 Sierra Leone 500 * 500

 South Africa 509,969 * 414,636

 South Sudan 12,036 * 13,904

 Swaziland 24,425 * 35,065

 Tanzania 268,616 * 330,038

 Uganda 284,084 * 306,195

 Zambia 226,661 * 292,175

 Zimbabwe 68,021 * 69,675

 East Africa Regional 800 * 800

 Southern Africa Regional 1,600 * 1,600

 East Asia and Pacific 86,218 * 73,117

 Burma 8,500 * 8,245

 Cambodia 3,000 * 4,588

 China 3,000 * 2,398

 Indonesia - * 250

 Papua New Guinea 2,500 * 2,280

 Thailand 500 * -

 Vietnam 66,978 * 53,173

 Regional Development Mission-Asia (RDM/A) 1,740 * 2,183

 Europe and Eurasia 10,503 * 21,204

 Georgia 450 * -

 Ukraine 8,753 * 21,204

 Eurasia Regional 1,300 * -

Global Health Programs - State

($ in Thousands)

156
FY 2012 

Actual FY 2013 CR1 FY 2014 Request

Global Health Programs - State

($ in Thousands)

 South and Central Asia 10,602 * 18,290

 India 7,000 * 8,386

 Central Asia Regional 3,602 * 9,904

 Western Hemisphere 182,236 * 162,802

 Brazil 1,300 * 1,078

 Dominican Republic 3,232 * 6,894

 Guyana 10,525 * 5,945

 Haiti 141,240 * 122,896

 Honduras 1,000 * -

 Barbados and Eastern Caribbean 13,741 * 14,108

 Central America Regional 11,198 * 11,881

Asia Middle East Regional 300 * -

Office of the Global AIDS Coordinator 2,259,746 * 2,188,931

 Additional Funding for Country Programs 317,694 * 227,057

 International Partnerships 1,345,000 * 1,695,000

 Oversight/Management 199,794 * 186,874

 Technical Support//Strategic Information/Evaluation 397,258 * 80,000

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175).

157
FY 2012 

Actual FY 2013 CR1 FY 2014 Request

TOTAL 2,519,950 2,535,372 2,837,812

 Africa 1,002,140 * 1,043,850

 Angola 1,000 * -

 Djibouti 1,650 * 1,384

 Ethiopia 92,898 * 90,328

 Ghana 95,568 * 93,254

 Guinea 5,700 * 3,414

 Kenya 92,000 * 89,774

 Malawi 31,500 * 37,500

 Mali 67,143 * 38,070

 Trans-Sahara Counter-Terrorism Partnership (TSCTP) [2,500] * [2,500]

 Mozambique 37,165 * 52,706

 Niger 1,000 * 2,000

 Nigeria 50,291 * 80,440

 Rwanda 53,500 * 51,420

 Senegal 50,000 * 30,212

 South Africa 14,734 * 17,320

 Tanzania 105,000 * 124,145

 Uganda 64,999 * 63,112

 Zambia 28,726 * 12,810

 Africa Regional 50,566 * 89,000

 Trans-Sahara Counter-Terrorism Partnership (TSCTP) [10,000] * [750]

 Central Africa Regional 22,588 * 18,112

 East Africa Regional 45,500 * 43,750

 Sahel Regional Program - * 21,000

 Southern Africa Regional 24,530 * 23,875

 West Africa Regional 66,082 * 60,224

 Trans-Sahara Counter-Terrorism Partnership (TSCTP) [10,000] * [8,000]

 East Asia and Pacific 285,490 * 320,598

 Cambodia 28,350 * 27,846

 Indonesia 104,500 * 111,649

 Laos 1,350 * 2,050

 Marshall Islands 492 * 500

 Micronesia 492 * 500

 Mongolia 3,000 * 7,820

 Philippines 81,055 * 87,682

 Thailand 5,051 * 5,051

 Timor-Leste 9,500 * 13,200

 Vietnam 18,000 * 34,800

 Regional Development Mission-Asia (RDM/A) 33,700 * 29,500

 Near East 19,039 * -

 Morocco 19,039 * -

 South and Central Asia 127,874 * 101,900

 Bangladesh 81,686 * 80,900

 India 18,500 * 12,000

 Maldives 2,000 * 2,000

 Nepal 16,188 * -

Development Assistance

($ in Thousands)

158
FY 2012 

Actual FY 2013 CR1 FY 2014 Request

Development Assistance

($ in Thousands)

 Sri Lanka 8,000 * 6,000

 South Asia Regional 1,500 * 1,000

 Western Hemisphere 333,785 * 306,530

 Bolivia 7,000 * 6,000

 Brazil 12,800 * 2,000

 Dominican Republic 12,300 * 9,830

 Ecuador 16,420 * 11,000

 El Salvador 23,904 * 39,000

 Guatemala 46,325 * 57,500

 Honduras 46,266 * 49,326

 Jamaica 6,000 * 3,000

 Mexico 33,350 * 10,000

 Nicaragua 9,400 * 9,600

 Paraguay 2,500 * 8,000

 Peru 41,280 * 43,100

 Barbados and Eastern Caribbean 11,640 * 10,000

 Central America Regional 15,500 * 10,500

 Latin America and Caribbean Regional 37,100 * 31,174

 South America Regional 12,000 * 6,500

Asia Middle East Regional 19,030 * -

USAID Asia Regional - * 9,923

BFS - Bureau for Food Security 283,900 * 357,435

DCHA - Democracy, Conflict, and Humanitarian Assistance 102,150 * 360,959

 Special Protection and Assistance Needs of Survivors (SPANS) 23,000 * 11,997

E3 - Economic Growth, Education, and Environment 165,700 * 162,298

IDEA - Office of Innovation and Development Alliances 86,418 * 62,203

MFS - Multilateral Food Security Programs 14,600 * -

OST - Office of Science and Technology - * 85,000

PPL - Policy, Planning and Learning 48,000 * 25,917

Women's Leadership Capacity Building 20,000 * -

Unallocated 11,824 * -

USAID Program Management Initiatives - * 1,199

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175).

159
FY 2012 

Actual1, 2, 3 FY 2013 CR4 FY 2014 

Request

TOTAL - ESF 6,146,707 5,673,923 5,458,254

Total Enduring 2,994,745 2,912,461 4,076,054

 Africa 607,731 * 564,021

 Cote d'Ivoire 14,715 * 11,500

 Democratic Republic of the Congo 47,915 * 59,892

 Kenya 4,750 * -

 Liberia 124,276 * 106,030

 Sierra Leone 4,500 * 1,600

 Somalia 23,377 * 49,400

 South Sudan 305,360 * 280,499

 Sudan 30,000 * 10,700

 Zimbabwe 25,578 * 25,100

 African Union 760 * 900

 Africa Regional 20,000 * 18,400

 Trans-Sahara Counter-Terrorism Partnership (TSCTP) [4,000] * [3,500]

 East Africa Regional 6,500 * -

 East Asia and Pacific 88,615 * 93,700

 Burma 35,100 * 51,200

 Cambodia 7,000 * 5,000

 China 10,500 * 4,500

 Timor-Leste 1,000 * -

 Vietnam 15,000 * -

 East Asia and Pacific Regional 13,015 * 26,000

 Regional Development Mission-Asia (RDM/A) 7,000 * 7,000

 Europe and Eurasia 8,500 * 352,941

 Albania - * 6,580

 Armenia - * 24,719

 Azerbaijan - * 11,029

 Belarus - * 11,000

 Bosnia and Herzegovina - * 27,660

 Cyprus 3,500 * -

 Georgia - * 43,028

 Kosovo - * 41,014

 Macedonia - * 5,636

 Moldova - * 14,050

 Montenegro - * 335

 Poland - * 3,000

 Serbia - * 16,103

 Ukraine - * 53,957

 Eurasia Regional 1,250 * -

 Europe and Eurasia Regional - * 68,330

 Europe Regional 1,250 * -

 International Fund for Ireland 2,500 * 2,500

 Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) - * 24,000

Economic Support Fund

($ in Thousands)

160
FY 2012 

Actual1, 2, 3 FY 2013 CR4 FY 2014 

Request

Economic Support Fund

($ in Thousands)

 Near East 1,410,930 * 1,203,396

 Egypt 250,000 * 250,000

 Egypt Debt Relief 100,000 * -

 Iraq 70,900 * 22,500

 Jordan 360,000 * 360,000

 Lebanon 84,725 * 70,000

 Morocco - * 20,896

 Tunisia 5,000 * 30,000

 Tunisia Enterprise Fund - * [20,000]

 West Bank and Gaza 395,699 * 370,000

 Yemen 26,606 * 45,000

 Middle East Multilaterals (MEM) 1,500 * 1,000

 Middle East Partnership Initiative (MEPI) 70,000 * -

 Middle East Regional Cooperation (MERC) 5,000 * 4,000

 Near East Regional Democracy 35,000 * 30,000

 Trans-Sahara Counter-Terrorism Partnership (TSCTP) 1,500 * -

 Middle East Regional (OMEP) 5,000 * -

 South and Central Asia 110,503 * 1,185,096

 Afghanistan 21,000 * 535,250

 India - * 3,000

 Kazakhstan - * 7,392

 Kyrgyz Republic - * 38,319

 Nepal 26,979 * 34,500

 Pakistan 57,500 * 513,500

 Tajikistan - * 19,125

 Turkmenistan - * 4,640

 Uzbekistan - * 5,512

 Central Asia Regional - * 20,858

 South and Central Asia Regional 5,024 * 3,000

 Western Hemisphere 465,541 * 432,200

 Colombia 172,000 * 140,000

 Cuba 20,000 * 15,000

 El Salvador 2,000 * -

 Haiti 148,281 * 139,000

 Mexico 33,260 * 35,000

 Venezuela 6,000 * 5,000

 Western Hemisphere Regional 84,000 * 98,200

 Caribbean Basin Security Initiative (CBSI) [17,000] * [29,200]

 Central America Regional Security Initiative (CARSI) [50,000] * [61,500]

 CT - Counterterrorism 5,000 * 12,000

 DCHA - Democracy, Conflict, and Humanitarian Assistance 33,900 * -

 Special Protection and Assistance Needs of Survivors (SPANS) 10,000 * -

 DRL - Democracy, Human Rights and Labor 6,000 * 64,000

 E3 - Economic Growth, Education, and Environment 15,352 * 14,800

 ECA - Educational and Cultural Affairs 5,000 * -

 ENR - Energy Resources 9,000 * 14,000

161
FY 2012 

Actual1, 2, 3 FY 2013 CR4 FY 2014 

Request

Economic Support Fund

($ in Thousands)

 Foreign Assistance Program Evaluation 600 * -

 OES - Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs 115,552 * 116,500

 Treasury GCC Transfer 100,000 * -

 Unallocated 4,521 * -

 Special Representatives 8,000 * 23,400

 Office of the Coordinator for Cyber Issues (S/CCI) - * 500

 Special Representative for Global Partnerships (S/GPI) 1,000 * 2,000

 Ambassador-at-Large for Global Women’s Issues (S/GWI) 5,000 * 20,000

 Senior Advisor for Civil Society and Emerging Democracies (S/SACSED) 1,000 * 500

 Special Representative to Muslim Communities (S/SRMC) 1,000 * 400

Total Overseas Contingency Operations - ESF 3,151,962 2,761,462 1,382,200

 Near East 477,000 * -

 Iraq 178,500 * -

 Jordan 100,000 * -

 Libya 3,000 * -

 Syria 55,500 * -

 Tunisia 30,000 * -

 Tunisia Enterprise Fund [20,000] * -

 Yemen 10,000 * -

 Tunisia Cash Transfer 100,000 * -

 South and Central Asia 2,662,962 * 1,382,200

 Afghanistan 1,815,762 * 1,130,000

 Pakistan 847,200 * 252,200

 CT - Counterterrorism 5,000 * -

 Reserve 7,000 * -

3/ The FY 2012 OCO Actual level reflects the transfer of $10 million from the Economic Support Fund to the International Narcotics Control 

and Law Enforcement account.

4/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175).

1/ The FY 2012 OCO Actual level reflects the transfer of $105 million from the Pakistan Counterinsurgency Capability Fund to the Economic 

Support Fund account.

2/ The FY 2012 OCO Actual level reflects the transfer of $285.5 million from the International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement 

account to the Economic Support Fund account.

162
FY 2012 

Actual1 FY 2013 CR2 FY 2014 

Request

TOTAL MRA 1,975,100 1,885,174 1,760,960

TOTAL Enduring - MRA 1,646,100 1,656,174 1,760,960

Population, Refugees, and Migration (PRM) 1,646,100 * 1,760,960

 Africa 394,700 * 457,200

 East Asia 45,400 * 44,400

 Europe 46,100 * 34,600

 Near East 443,690 * 450,900

 South Asia 87,955 * 117,600

 Western Hemisphere 53,855 * 44,200

 Protection Priorities 156,500 * 177,410

 Migration 24,400 * 22,500

 Administrative Expenses 33,500 * 35,150

 Humanitarian Migrants to Israel 20,000 * 15,000

 Refugee Admissions 340,000 * 362,000

Total Overseas Contingency Operations - MRA 329,000 229,000 -

U.S. Emergency Refugee and Migration Assistance 27,200 27,366 250,000

Migration and Refugee Assistance & U.S. Emergency Refugee and Migration 

Assistance Fund

($ in Thousands)

2/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175).

1/ The FY 2012 OCO Actual level reflects the transfer of $100 million from the Pakistan Counterinsurgency Capability Fund to the Mirgration 

and Refugee Assistance.

163
FY 2012 

Actual FY 2013 CR FY 2014 Request

TOTAL - - 580,000

 Near East - * 580,000

 MENA IF Fund - * 475,000

 Middle East Partnership Initiative (MEPI) - * 75,000

 USAID Middle East Regional (OMEP) - * 30,000

Middle East and North Africa Incentive Fund

($ in Thousands)

164
FY 2012 

Actual1, 2 FY 2013 CR3 FY 2014 

Request

TOTAL - INCLE 1,635,705 2,051,199 1,473,727

Total Enduring 1,061,100 1,067,594 1,129,727

 Africa 85,900 * 60,663

 Democratic Republic of the Congo 6,000 * 3,250

 Kenya 2,000 * 2,000

 Liberia 17,000 * 11,713

 Mozambique 500 * 500

 Somalia 2,000 * 1,780

 South Africa 3,000 * 2,000

 South Sudan 32,000 * 22,000

 Tanzania 450 * 450

 Uganda 600 * -

 Africa Regional 22,350 * 16,970

 Trans-Sahara Counter-Terrorism Partnership (TSCTP) [3,500] * [1,470]

 East Asia and Pacific 24,645 * 29,232

 China 800 * 800

 Indonesia 11,550 * 10,066

 Laos 1,000 * 1,000

 Malaysia - * 800

 Philippines 2,450 * 8,000

 Thailand 1,740 * 1,466

 Timor-Leste 660 * 660

 Vietnam 550 * 450

 East Asia and Pacific Regional 5,895 * 5,990

 Europe and Eurasia - * 43,798

 Albania - * 4,450

 Armenia - * 2,824

 Azerbaijan - * 1,226

 Bosnia and Herzegovina - * 6,735

 Georgia - * 3,947

 Kosovo - * 10,674

 Macedonia - * 1,786

 Moldova - * 3,230

 Montenegro - * 1,826

 Serbia - * 3,000

 Ukraine - * 4,100

 Near East 135,395 * 126,052

 Egypt 1,000 * 4,106

 Iraq - * 23,052

 Jordan 500 * -

 Lebanon 24,000 * 13,894

 Libya - * 1,500

 Morocco 1,500 * 1,500

 Tunisia - * 8,000

 West Bank and Gaza 100,000 * 70,000

 Yemen 7,395 * 3,000

International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement

($ in Thousands)

165
FY 2012 

Actual1, 2 FY 2013 CR3 FY 2014 

Request

International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement

($ in Thousands)

 Trans-Sahara Counter-Terrorism Partnership (TSCTP) 1,000 * 1,000

 South and Central Asia 12,814 * 235,260

 Afghanistan - * 160,000

 Bangladesh 1,394 * 2,600

 Kazakhstan - * 1,200

 Kyrgyz Republic - * 6,000

 Maldives - * 1,200

 Nepal 3,700 * 3,300

 Pakistan - * 45,000

 Sri Lanka 720 * 720

 Tajikistan - * 7,000

 Turkmenistan - * 500

 Uzbekistan - * 740

 Central Asia Regional - * 7,000

 South and Central Asia Regional 7,000 * -

 Western Hemisphere 593,270 * 465,431

 Bolivia 7,500 * 5,000

 Brazil 3,000 * -

 Colombia 160,600 * 149,000

 Ecuador 4,500 * -

 Guatemala 5,000 * -

 Haiti 19,420 * 12,000

 Mexico 248,500 * 148,131

 Paraguay 500 * -

 Peru 29,250 * 26,300

 Western Hemisphere Regional 115,000 * 125,000

 Caribbean Basin Security Initiative (CBSI) [30,000] * [25,000]

 Central America Regional Security Initiative (CARSI) [85,000] * [100,000]

 INL - International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs 190,356 * 150,571

 Alien Smuggling/Border Security 1,000 * 750

 Anti-Money Laundering Programs 4,150 * 3,600

 Critical Flight Safety Program (CFSP) 16,250 * 11,085

 Civilian Policing 4,000 * 4,517

 Criminal Youth Gangs 7,000 * -

 Cyber Crime and IPR 5,000 * 3,500

 Demand Reduction 12,500 * 12,500

 Fighting Corruption 5,004 * 3,900

 International Law Enforcement Academy (ILEA) 31,300 * 24,000

 Inter-regional Aviation Support 53,652 * 40,000

 International Organizations 5,000 * 3,869

 International Organized Crime 1,000 * 750

 International Police Peacekeeping Operations Support (IPPOS) 10,000 * 2,500

 Program Development and Support 34,500 * 39,600

 J/TIP - Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking In Persons 18,720 * 18,720

166
FY 2012 

Actual1, 2 FY 2013 CR3 FY 2014 

Request

International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement

($ in Thousands)

Total Overseas Contingency Operations - INCLE 574,605 983,605 344,000

 Near East 175,605 * -

 Iraq 137,000 * -

 Morocco 7,500 * -

 Tunisia 22,500 * -

 Yemen 3,605 * -

 Middle East Response Fund (MERF) 5,000 * -

 South and Central Asia 399,000 * 344,000

 Afghanistan 324,000 * 315,000

 Pakistan 75,000 * 29,000

3/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175).

1/ The FY 2012 OCO Actual level reflects the transfer of $409 million from the International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement account 

to the Economic Support Fund ($285.5 million), Transition Initiatives ($37 million), Nonproliferation, Antiterrorism, Demining and Related 

Programs ($0.5 million), Peacekeeping Operations ($86 million) accounts.

2/ The FY 2012 OCO Actual level reflects the transfer of $10 million from the Economic Support Fund to the International Narcotics Control 

and Law Enforcement account.

167
FY 2012 

Actual1 FY 2013 CR2 FY 2014 

Request

NADR Total 711,270 714,381 616,125

Total - Enduring 590,113 593,724 616,125

Nonproliferation Programs 294,729 * 267,494

 Nonproliferation and Disarmament Fund 30,000 * 25,000

 Export Control and Related Border Security Assistance 61,809 * 53,979

 Global Threat Reduction 68,978 * 63,515

 IAEA Voluntary Contribution 85,900 * 88,000

 CTBT International Monitoring System 33,000 * 31,000

 Weapons of Mass Destruction Terrorism 6,042 * 5,000

 UN Security Council Resolution 1540 Trust Fund 1,500 * -

 CTBTO Preparatory Commission-Special Contributions 7,500 * 1,000

Anti-terrorism Programs 146,284 * 222,631

 Antiterrorism Assistance 79,284 * 169,540

 Caribbean Basin Security Initiative (CBSI) [2,000] * [1,800]

 Trans-Sahara Counter-Terrorism Partnership (TSCTP) [7,000] * [9,000]

 Countering Violent Extremism - * 3,000

 Terrorist Interdiction Program 42,000 * 25,091

 CT Engagement with Allies 8,000 * 10,000

 Counterterrorism Financing 17,000 * 15,000

Regional Stability and Humanitarian Assistance 149,100 * 126,000

 Conventional Weapons Destruction 149,100 * 126,000

Total - Overseas Contingency Operations 121,157 120,657 -

 Antiterrorism Assistance - OCO 120,657 * -

 Conventional Weapons Destruction - OCO 500 * -

Nonproliferation, Antiterrorism, Demining and Related Programs

($ in thousands)

2/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175).

1/ The FY 2012 OCO Actual level reflects the transfer of $0.5 million from International Narcotics and Law Enforcement to Nonproliferation, 

Antiterrorism, Demining and Related Programs ($0.5 million).

168
 Peacekeeping Operations

($ in Thousands)

FY 2012 

Actual1, 2 FY 2013 CR3 FY 2014 

Request

TOTAL - PKO 509,818 385,671 347,000

Total Enduring - PKO 302,818 304,671 347,000

 Africa 182,968 * 227,900

 Cote d'Ivoire - * 2,000

 Democratic Republic of the Congo 19,000 * 11,000

 Ethiopia 4,000 * -

 Liberia 5,000 * 2,000

 Mali - * 83,750

 Somalia 97,818 * 70,000

 South Sudan 48,000 * 38,000

 Africa Regional 9,150 * 21,150

 Multinational Force and Observers (MFO) 28,000 * 28,000

 Political-Military Affairs 91,850 * 91,100

 Trans-Sahara Counter-Terrorism Partnership (TSCTP) - * 16,100

 Global Peacekeeping Operations Initiative (GPOI) 91,850 * 75,000

Total Overseas Contingency Operations - PKO 207,000 81,000 -

 Africa 187,000 * -

 Mali 81,000 * -

 Somalia 96,000 * -

 Africa Regional 10,000 * -

 Political-Military Affairs 20,000 * -

 Trans-Sahara Counter-Terrorism Partnership (TSCTP) 20,000 * -

3/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175).

1/ The FY 2012 OCO Actual level reflects the transfer of $40 million from the Pakistan Counterinsurgency Capability Fund to Peacekeeping 

Operations.

2/ The FY 2012 OCO Actual level reflects the transfer of $41 million of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement to Peacekeeping 

Operations.

169
FY 2012 

Actual FY 2013 CR1 FY 2014 Request

TOTAL 105,788 106,435 105,573

 Africa 15,207 * 13,530

 Angola 435 * 360

 Benin 230 * 210

 Botswana 779 * 560

 Burkina Faso 308 * 200

 Burundi 420 * 325

 Cameroon 270 * 240

 Cape Verde 108 * 100

 Central African Republic 115 * 120

 Chad 375 * 280

 Comoros 127 * 100

 Cote d'Ivoire 66 * 280

 Democratic Republic of the Congo 473 * 320

 Djibouti 363 * 280

 Ethiopia 597 * 570

 Gabon 212 * 180

 Ghana 759 * 670

 Guinea 57 * 240

 Guinea-Bissau - * 25

 Kenya 910 * 760

 Lesotho 115 * 100

 Liberia 489 * 360

 Malawi 294 * 240

 Mali 69 * 280

 Mauritania 185 * 260

 Mauritius 115 * 110

 Mozambique 456 * 340

 Namibia 136 * 120

 Niger 47 * 250

 Nigeria 926 * 730

 Republic of the Congo 66 * 100

 Rwanda 530 * 410

 Sao Tome and Principe 118 * 100

 Senegal 939 * 770

 Seychelles 135 * 140

 Sierra Leone 447 * 280

 Somalia - * 200

 South Africa 782 * 650

 South Sudan 858 * 800

 Swaziland 100 * 100

 Tanzania 461 * 320

 The Gambia 111 * 90

 Togo 248 * 120

 Uganda 613 * 520

 Zambia 363 * 320

 East Asia and Pacific 9,015 * 9,290

 Cambodia 308 * 450

 Indonesia 1,884 * 1,700

International Military Education & Training

($ in Thousands)

170
FY 2012 

Actual FY 2013 CR1 FY 2014 Request

International Military Education & Training

($ in Thousands)

 Laos 276 * 400

 Malaysia 829 * 900

 Marshall Islands 44 * 50

 Mongolia 875 * 850

 Papua New Guinea - * 250

 Philippines 1,954 * 1,700

 Samoa 115 * 40

 Thailand 1,318 * 1,300

 Timor-Leste 300 * 400

 Tonga - * 250

 Vietnam 611 * 1,000

 East Asia and Pacific Regional 501 * -

 Europe and Eurasia 29,994 * 29,550

 Albania 1,067 * 1,000

 Armenia 675 * 600

 Azerbaijan 700 * 600

 Bosnia and Herzegovina 999 * 1,000

 Bulgaria 1,746 * 2,000

 Croatia 946 * 1,100

 Czech Republic 1,892 * 1,800

 Estonia 1,212 * 1,200

 Georgia 1,879 * 1,800

 Greece 102 * 100

 Hungary 947 * 1,000

 Kosovo 810 * 750

 Latvia 1,129 * 1,200

 Lithuania 1,125 * 1,200

 Macedonia 1,064 * 1,100

 Malta 150 * 150

 Moldova 860 * 750

 Montenegro 574 * 600

 Poland 2,100 * 2,000

 Portugal 25 * 100

 Romania 1,754 * 1,700

 Serbia 887 * 1,050

 Slovakia 1,003 * 900

 Slovenia 669 * 650

 Turkey 3,839 * 3,300

 Ukraine 1,840 * 1,900

 Near East 17,998 * 20,495

 Algeria 1,294 * 1,300

 Bahrain 554 * 725

 Egypt 1,389 * 1,800

 Iraq 1,997 * 2,000

 Jordan 3,650 * 3,800

 Lebanon 2,372 * 2,250

 Libya 296 * 1,500

 Morocco 1,898 * 1,710

 Oman 1,638 * 2,000

171
FY 2012 

Actual FY 2013 CR1 FY 2014 Request

International Military Education & Training

($ in Thousands)

 Saudi Arabia 9 * 10

 Tunisia 1,837 * 2,300

 Yemen 1,064 * 1,100

 South and Central Asia 13,178 * 13,309

 Afghanistan 1,176 * 1,500

 Bangladesh 994 * 1,000

 India 1,462 * 1,260

 Kazakhstan 785 * 707

 Kyrgyz Republic 649 * 1,000

 Maldives 193 * 176

 Nepal 1,142 * 900

 Pakistan 4,868 * 5,000

 Sri Lanka 690 * 626

 Tajikistan 538 * 540

 Turkmenistan 349 * 300

 Uzbekistan 332 * 300

 Western Hemisphere 14,597 * 14,396

 Argentina 738 * 350

 Belize 187 * 180

 Bolivia 227 * 200

 Brazil 638 * 625

 Chile 855 * 810

 Colombia 1,656 * 1,417

 Costa Rica 297 * 350

 Dominican Republic 829 * 765

 Ecuador 281 * 360

 El Salvador 1,029 * 1,000

 Guatemala 840 * 720

 Guyana 339 * 300

 Haiti 224 * 220

 Honduras 774 * 650

 Jamaica 700 * 700

 Mexico 1,190 * 1,449

 Nicaragua 1 * 700

 Panama 762 * 720

 Paraguay 423 * 460

 Peru 619 * 585

 Suriname 239 * 225

 The Bahamas 190 * 180

 Trinidad and Tobago 175 * 180

 Uruguay 539 * 450

 Barbados and Eastern Caribbean 845 * 800

Political-Military Affairs 5,799 * 5,003

 IMET Administrative Expenses 5,799 * 5,003

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175).

172
FY 2012 

Actual FY 2013 CR1 FY 2014 Request

TOTAL - FMF 6,312,000 6,343,885 5,956,959

Total Enduring - FMF 5,210,000 5,241,885 5,445,959

 Africa 16,818 * 15,321

 Botswana 200 * 200

 Chad 200 * -

 Cote d'Ivoire 300 * 200

 Democratic Republic of the Congo - * -

 Djibouti 1,500 * 1,000

 Ethiopia 843 * 843

 Ghana 350 * 350

 Guinea 400 * 200

 Kenya 1,500 * 1,178

 Liberia 6,500 * 5,525

 Mauritania 200 * -

 Niger 400 * -

 Nigeria 1,000 * 1,000

 Rwanda - * 200

 Senegal 325 * 325

 South Africa 700 * 700

 South Sudan - * 200

 Tanzania 200 * 200

 Uganda 200 * 200

 State Africa Regional (AF) 2,000 * 3,000

 Trans-Sahara Counter-Terrorism Partnership (TSCTP) - * [1,000]

 East Asia and Pacific 48,302 * 72,488

 Cambodia 800 * 1,000

 Indonesia 14,000 * 14,000

 Laos - * 500

 Mongolia 3,000 * 2,400

 Philippines 27,000 * 50,000

 Thailand 1,187 * 988

 Timor-Leste - * 300

 Tonga - * 300

 Vietnam 2,315 * 3,000

 Europe and Eurasia 107,010 * 86,600

 Albania 3,000 * 2,600

 Armenia 2,700 * 2,700

 Azerbaijan 2,700 * 2,700

 Bosnia and Herzegovina 4,500 * 4,500

 Bulgaria 8,647 * 7,000

 Croatia 2,500 * 2,500

 Czech Republic 5,000 * 3,000

 Estonia 2,400 * 2,400

Foreign Military Financing

($ in Thousands)

173
FY 2012 

Actual FY 2013 CR1 FY 2014 Request

Foreign Military Financing

($ in Thousands)

 Georgia 14,400 * 12,000

 Hungary 900 * 450

 Kosovo 3,000 * 4,000

 Latvia 2,248 * 2,250

 Lithuania 2,550 * 2,550

 Macedonia 3,600 * 3,600

 Moldova 1,250 * 1,250

 Montenegro 1,200 * 1,200

 Poland 24,165 * 14,000

 Romania 12,000 * 8,000

 Serbia 1,800 * 1,800

 Slovakia 1,000 * 450

 Slovenia 450 * 450

 Ukraine 7,000 * 4,200

 Europe and Eurasia Regional - * 3,000

 Near East 4,813,500 * 4,840,000

 Bahrain 10,000 * 10,000

 Egypt 1,300,000 * 1,300,000

 Israel 3,075,000 * 3,100,000

 Jordan 300,000 * 300,000

 Lebanon 75,000 * 75,000

 Libya - * -

 Morocco 8,000 * 7,000

 Oman 8,000 * 8,000

 Tunisia 17,500 * 20,000

 Yemen 20,000 * 20,000

 South and Central Asia 90,685 * 311,335

 Bangladesh 2,200 * 2,500

 Kazakhstan 1,800 * 1,500

 Kyrgyz Republic 1,500 * 1,500

 Maldives 400 * 400

 Nepal 1,240 * 1,300

 Pakistan 79,555 * 300,000

 Sri Lanka 500 * 450

 Tajikistan 800 * 1,500

 Turkmenistan - * 685

 Uzbekistan 2,690 * 1,500

 Western Hemisphere 70,885 * 60,215

 Belize 200 * 1,000

 Colombia 40,000 * 28,500

 Costa Rica 815 * 1,400

 Ecuador 450 * 450

 El Salvador 1,250 * 1,800

 Guatemala 500 * 1,740

 Haiti - * 1,600

174
FY 2012 

Actual FY 2013 CR1 FY 2014 Request

Foreign Military Financing

($ in Thousands)

 Honduras 1,000 * 4,500

 Mexico 7,000 * 7,000

 Nicaragua - * 385

 Panama 2,340 * 1,840

 Paraguay 350 * -

 Peru 1,980 * 2,500

 Western Hemisphere Regional 15,000 * 7,500

Caribbean Basin Security Initiative (CBSI) [15,000] * [7,500]

 PM - Political-Military Affairs 62,800 * 60,000

 FMF Administrative Expenses 62,800 * 60,000

Overseas Contingency Operations FMF 1,102,000 1,102,000 511,000

 Near East 862,000 * 500,000

 Iraq 850,000 * 500,000

 Tunisia 12,000 * -

 South and Central Asia 218,423 * -

 Pakistan 215,853 * -

 Uzbekistan 2,570 * -

 PM - Political-Military Affairs - * 11,000

 FMF Administrative Expenses - * 11,000

 Reserve 21,577 * -

1/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175).

175
FY 2012 

Actual1 FY 2013 CR2 FY 2014 

Request

TOTAL 343,905 350,839 320,645

IO - International Organizations and Programs 343,905 * 320,645

 International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) 950 * 800

 International Development Law Organization (IDLO) 600 * 600

 International Maritime Organization (IMO) 400 * 360

 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change / UN Framework Convention on Climate Change 10,000 * 13,000

 International Chemicals and Toxins Programs 3,650 * 3,610

 International Conservation Programs 7,900 * 7,000

 Montreal Protocol Multilateral Fund 27,000 * 25,500

 Multilateral Action Initiatives - * 1,000

 OAS Development Assistance 3,500 * 3,400

 OAS Fund for Strengthening Democracy 4,500 * 2,700

 Regional Cooperation Agreement on Combating Piracy and Armed Robbery Against Ships in Asia 

(ReCAAP) - * 50

 UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (UN OCHA) 3,000 * 2,800

 UN Voluntary Funds for Technical Cooperation in the Field of Human Rights 1,400 * 1,200

 UN Women (formerly UNIFEM) 7,500 * 7,500

 UN-HABITAT UN Human Settlements Program 1,900 * 1,400

 UN Capital Development Fund (UNCDF) 955 * 595

 UN Democracy Fund (UNDF) 4,755 * 4,200

 UN Development Program (UNDP) 82,000 * 67,000

 UN Environment Program (UNEP) 7,700 * 7,550

 International Contributions for Scientific, Educational, and Cultural Activities (UNESCO/ICSECA) - * 880

 UN Population Fund (UNFPA) 30,200 * 37,000

 UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (UNHCHR) 5,000 * 2,000

 UN Children's Fund (UNICEF) 131,755 * 125,000

 UN Voluntary Fund for Victims of Torture (UNVFVT) 6,000 * 3,000

 World Meteorological Organization (WMO) 2,090 * 1,500

 WTO Technical Assistance 1,150 * 1,000

International Organizations and Programs International Organizations and Programs

($ in Thousands)

2/ The FY 2013 CR is based on the annualized continuing resolution calculation for FY 2013 (P.L. 112-175).

1/ The FY 2012 Actual level reflects the transfer of $4.8 million from International Organizations & Programs to Global Health Programs-USAID.

176