alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 177

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 177 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 70 FR 72074, Dec. 1, 2005; and 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

#### § 177.1440 4,4′-Isopropylidenediphenol-epichlorohydrin resins minimum molecular weight 10,000.

4,4′-Isopropylidenediphenol-epichlo-rohydrin resins having a minimum molecular weight of 10,000 may be safely used as articles or components of articles intended for use in producing, manufacturing, packing, processing, preparing, treating, packaging, transporting, or holding food in accordance with the following prescribed conditions:

(a) 4,4′-Isopropylidenediphenol-ep-ichlorohydrin resins consist of basic resins produced by the condensation of equimolar amounts of 4,4′-isopropylidenediphenol and epichlorohydrin terminated with phenol, to which may have been added certain optional adjuvant substances required in the production of the resins.

(b) The optional adjuvant substances required in the production of the resins may include substances generally recognized as safe in food, substances used in accordance with a prior sanction or approval, and the following:

| List of substances | Limitations |
| --- | --- |
| Butyl alcohol | Not to exceed 300 p.p.m. as residual solvent in finished resin. |
| Ethyl alcohol | |
| Toluene | Not to exceed 1,000 p.p.m. as residual solvent in finished resin. |

(c) 4,4′-Isopropylidenediphenol-ep-ichlorohydrin resins shall meet the following nonvolatile extractives limitations:

(1) Maximum extractable nonvolatile fraction of 2 parts per million when extracted with distilled water at 70 °C for 2 hours, using a volume-to-surface ratio of 2 milliliters per square inch.

(2) Maximum extractable nonvolatile fraction of 3 parts per million when extracted with *n-*heptane at 70 °C for 2 hours, using a volume-to-surface ratio of 2 milliliters per square inch.

(3) Maximum extractable nonvolatile fraction of 6 parts per million when extracted with 10 percent (by volume) ethyl alcohol in distilled water at 70 °C for 2 hours, using a volume-to-surface ratio of 2 milliliters per square inch.

(d) The provisions of this section are not applicable to 4,4′-isopropylidene-diphenol-epichlorohydrin resins listed in other sections of subchapter B of this chapter.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 766 

To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 respecting the scoring 

of preventive health savings. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2023 

Mr. BURGESS (for himself and Ms. DEGETTE) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Budget 

A BILL 

To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 respecting 

the scoring of preventive health savings. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Preventive Health Sav5 ings Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SCORING OF PREVENTIVE HEALTH SAVINGS. 

7 Section 202 of the Congressional Budget and Im8 poundment Control Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 602) is amend9 ed by adding at the end the following: 

10 ‘‘(h) SCORING OF PREVENTIVE HEALTH SAVINGS.— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 766 IH

1 ‘‘(1) DETERMINATION BY THE DIRECTOR.— 

2 Upon a request by the chairman or ranking minority 

3 member of the Committee on the Budget, the Com4 mittee on Finance, or the Committee on Health, 

5 Education, Labor, and Pensions of the Senate, or by 

6 the chairman or ranking minority member of the 

7 Committee on the Budget, the Committee on Energy 

8 and Commerce, or the Committee on Ways and 

9 Means of the House of Representatives, the Director 

10 shall determine if a proposed measure would result 

11 in reductions in budget outlays in budgetary out12 years through the use of preventive health and pre13 ventive health services. 

14 ‘‘(2) PROJECTIONS.—If the Director determines 

15 that a measure would result in substantial reduc16 tions in budget outlays as described in paragraph 

17 (1), the Director— 

18 ‘‘(A) shall include, in any projection pre19 pared by the Director, a description and esti20 mate of the reductions in budget outlays in the 

21 budgetary outyears and a description of the 

22 basis for such conclusions; and 

23 ‘‘(B) may prepare a budget projection that 

24 includes some or all of the budgetary outyears, 

25 notwithstanding the time periods for projections 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 766 IH

1 described in subsection (e) and sections 308, 

2 402, and 424. 

3 ‘‘(3) DEFINITIONS.—As used in this sub4 section— 

5 ‘‘(A) the term ‘budgetary outyears’ means 

6 the 2 consecutive 10-year periods beginning 

7 with the first fiscal year that is 10 years after 

8 the budget year provided for in the most re9 cently agreed to concurrent resolution on the 

10 budget; and 

11 ‘‘(B) the term ‘preventive health’ means an 

12 action that focuses on the health of the public, 

13 individuals, and defined populations in order to 

14 protect, promote, and maintain health and 

15 wellness and prevent disease, disability, and 

16 premature death that is demonstrated by cred17 ible and publicly available evidence from epide18 miological projection models, clinical trials, ob19 servational studies in humans, longitudinal 

20 studies, and meta-analysis.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
§ 524.86 Amitraz. ( a ) *Specifications.* Amitraz liquid contains 19.9 percent amitraz in an organic solvent.
( b ) *Sponsor.* See No. 054771 in § 510.600(c) of this chapter.
( c ) *Conditions of use* — ( 1 ) *Indications for use.* For dogs for the treatment of generalized demodicosis (*Demodex canis*).
( 2 ) *Amount.* One 10.6 milliliter bottle per 2 gallons of warm water (250 parts per million) for each treatment, for a total of 3 to 6 treatments, 14 days apart.
( 3 ) *Limitations.* Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian.
[47 FR 18589, Apr. 30, 1982, as amended at 79 FR 10967, Feb. 27, 2014]
Attachment 1:

Results of PubMed Search

Petition to Establish a Tolerance Exemption Trichoderma asperelloides strain JM41R Dec.10, 2014

Page 12 of 55 
Petition to Establish a Tolerance Exemption Trichoderma asperelloides strain JM41R Dec.10, 2014

Page 13 of 55
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      17,363,000
<SECURITIES>                                80,014,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               29,478,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           139,435,000
<PP&E>                                      12,974,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             153,950,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       63,752,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  99,847,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               153,950,000
<SALES>                                     93,437,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           132,495,000
<CGS>                                        2,643,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,382,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           126,078,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (4,296,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,361,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (6,657,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           9,403
<SECURITIES>                                    43,317
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                55,540
<PP&E>                                          12,457
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,172
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  66,093
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,720
<BONDS>                                          4,524
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        90,622
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1,458)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    66,093
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,705
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                34,768
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 434
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (22,219)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (2.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 15

   INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS' AWARENESS LETTER


   February 9, 1998


   Essef Corporation and Subsidiaries
   220 Park Drive
   Chardon, Ohio


   We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the
   American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim
   financial information of Essef Corporation and Subsidiaries for the periods
   ended December 31, 1997 and 1996, as indicated in our report dated January
   23, 1998; because we did not do an audit, we expressed no opinion on that
   information.

   We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
   Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 1997, is
   incorporated by reference in Registration Statement No. 33-17758 on Form S-8.

   We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c)
   under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the
   Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report
   prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and
   11 of that Act.






   DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

   Cleveland, Ohio











                                  Page 16 of 16
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MUSHTAQ AHMED MIAN and YASMIN MUSHTAQ MIAN,

Appellants,

v.

HERRON BAY COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION INC.,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-3147

[June 28, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Martin J. Bidwill, Judge; L.T. Case No. 15-011836 CACE 

05.

Gregory M. Ochalek, P.L.L.C., Miami Gardens, for appellants.

Shelley J. Murray of Straley & Otto, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., GROSS and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CEC Entertainment, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 1, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned certifies to his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods
presented in the Report.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Christopher D. MorrisChristopher D. MorrisChief Financial OfficerMay 11, 2007


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to CEC
Entertainment, Inc. and will be retained by CEC Entertainment, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 71.20 Publication of regulation. The Commissioner will forward for publication in the Federal Register, within 90 days after filing of the petition (or within 180 days if the time is extended as provided for in section 721(d)(1) of the act): ( a ) A regulation listing in part 73 or 74 of this chapter the color additive on the appropriate list or lists as provided under section 721(b)(1). ( 1 ) Such a regulation may list the color additive for use generally in or on foods, drugs, or cosmetics or for use in coloring the human body, as the case may be, or may prescribe the conditions under which the color additive may be safely used (including, but not limited to, specifications as to the particular food, drug, or cosmetic or classes of food, drugs, or cosmetics in or on which such color additive may be used, or for the material intended for coloring the human body; the maximum quantity of any straight color or diluent that may be used or permitted to remain in or on such food, drug, or cosmetic or article intended for coloring the human body; the manner in which such color additive may be added to or used in or on such food, drug, or cosmetic or for coloring the human body; and any directions or other labeling or packing requirements for such color additives deemed necessary to assure the safety of such use).
( 2 ) Such regulations shall list the color additive only for the use or uses for which it has been found suitable and for which it may safely be employed. Alternatively, the Commissioner shall by order deny the petition, and notify the petitioner of such order and the reasons therefor.
( 3 ) The regulation shall list any use or uses in meat, meat food product, or poultry product subject to the Federal Meat Inspection Act (FMIA) (21 U.S.C. 601 *et seq.*) or the Poultry Products Inspection (PPIA) (21 U.S.C. 451 *et seq.*) for which the color additive has been found suitable and for which it may safely be employed.
( b ) Whenever the Commissioner finds that batch certification is not necessary for the protection of the public health he will, by order, exempt the color additive from the certification procedure. In determining whether certification of a color additive is necessary, the Commissioner will consider the composition of the additive, its manufacturing process, possible impurities, its toxic potential, control and analytical procedures necessary to assure compliance with the listing specifications, and the variability of its composition.
[42 FR 15639, Mar. 22, 1977, as amended at 65 FR 51762, Aug. 25, 2000]
§ 582.5778 Sodium phosphate. ( a ) *Product.* Sodium phosphate (mono-, di-, and tribasic).
( b ) *Conditions of use.* This substance is generally recognized as safe when used in accordance with good manufacturing or feeding practice.
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Anaren  Microwave,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended  September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Lawrence A. Sala, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   the Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   the information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of the
      Company.

/s/ Lawrence A. Sala
-------------------------------------
Lawrence A. Sala
President and Chief Executive Officer
October 23, 2002
# C_2015046EN.01002101.xml

| 9.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/21

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzgericht — Außenstelle Linz (Austria) lodged on 6 November 2014 — Dilly’s Wellnesshotel GmbH

(Case C-493/14)

(2015/C 046/26)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesfinanzgericht — Außenstelle Linz

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Dilly’s Wellnesshotel GmbH

Appellant:

Respondent authority: Finanzamt Linz

Respondent authority:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Is EU law infringed if an aid scheme makes use of the special procedure under Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 (‘GBER’) (1) in accordance with Article 25 in order to be exempt from the obligation to notify under Article 108(3) TFEU, but does not comply with various obligations of Chapter I of the GBER and, moreover, does not make any reference to the GBER? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is EU law infringed if an aid scheme makes use of the special procedure under Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 (‘GBER’) (1) in accordance with Article 25 in order to be exempt from the obligation to notify under Article 108(3) TFEU, but does not comply with various obligations of Chapter I of the GBER and, moreover, does not make any reference to the GBER?

1

| 2. | Is EU law infringed if an aid scheme is based on the special procedure of the GBER which is applicable to environmental aid in accordance with Article 25 but the requirements laid down in Chapter II — namely the promotion of environmental protection measures and energy-saving measures under Article 17(1) GBER — are not satisfied? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is EU law infringed if an aid scheme is based on the special procedure of the GBER which is applicable to environmental aid in accordance with Article 25 but the requirements laid down in Chapter II — namely the promotion of environmental protection measures and energy-saving measures under Article 17(1) GBER — are not satisfied?

| 3. | Does EU law preclude national rules which contain no temporal restriction and also no reference to the period stated in the exemption notice, with the result that the limitation of the energy tax refund to 10 years, required in Article 25(3) GBER, is to be inferred only from the exemption notice? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Does EU law preclude national rules which contain no temporal restriction and also no reference to the period stated in the exemption notice, with the result that the limitation of the energy tax refund to 10 years, required in Article 25(3) GBER, is to be inferred only from the exemption notice?

---

(1)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 of 6 August 2008 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the common market in application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty (General block exemption Regulation), OJ 2008 L 214, p. 3.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE GULFWEST
OIL COMPANY QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000813779
<NAME>                        0
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    0

<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                  MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>               1
<CASH>                        (34,420)
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 702,802
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   5,551
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              748,457
<PP&E>                        9,636,454
<DEPRECIATION>                (2,452,806)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                8,151,221
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         6,952,541
<BONDS>                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   130
<COMMON>                      3,231
<OTHER-SE>                    (2,613,705)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  8,151,221
<SALES>                       246,240
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              273,241
<CGS>                         284,168
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 859,008
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            202,541
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (783,406)
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (783,406)
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  (783,406)
<EPS-BASIC>                 (.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 (.28)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  Annual  Report of  Programmer's  Paradise,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-K for the period  ending  December 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Simon F. Nynens, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:


(1)       The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



/s/  Simon F. Nynens
-------------------------------------
Simon F. Nynens
President and Chief Executive Officer
March 13, 2006

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company  and will be  retained by Company and  furnished  to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.