alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AVITAR'S
QUARTERLY REPORT FOR THE QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          76,623
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  542,325
<ALLOWANCES>                                    35,000
<INVENTORY>                                    330,187
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,197,979
<PP&E>                                       1,019,075
<DEPRECIATION>                                 654,390
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,568,155
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,159,637
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     18,167
<COMMON>                                       252,924
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,005,625
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,568,637
<SALES>                                        807,664
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               807,664
<CGS>                                          625,450
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,014,010
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,272
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,210,348)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,210,348)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,210,348)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.05)



</TABLE>
# C_2014085EN.01002803.xml

| 22.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 85/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 85/28

---

Action brought on 31 January 2014 — ZZ v EIB

(Case F-8/14)

2014/C 85/50

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: A. Senes and L. Payot, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Investment Bank

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision refusing to promote the applicant from function F to function E.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Adjudication Committee of 23 October 2013; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Adjudication Committee of 23 October 2013;

| — | order the EIB to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the EIB to pay the costs.

---
§ 556.733 Tildipirosin. ( a ) *Acceptable daily intake (ADI).* The ADI for total residue of tildipirosin is 50 μg/kg of body weight per day.
( b ) *Tolerances.* The tolerance for tildipirosin (the marker residue) is: ( 1 ) *Cattle.* ( i ) Liver (the target tissue): 10 ppm.
( ii ) [Reserved]
( 2 ) [Reserved]
( c ) *Related conditions of use.* See § 522.2460 of this chapter.
[84 FR 32993, July 11, 2019, as amended at 85 FR 18121, Apr. 1, 2020]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's Form 10-K for the twelve months ended December 31, 1999, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             254
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,659
<ALLOWANCES>                                       997
<INVENTORY>                                     14,504
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                46,146
<PP&E>                                          63,606
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,189
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  94,686
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           38,143
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           138
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,762
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    94,686
<SALES>                                        242,726
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               242,726
<CGS>                                          163,964
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   72,667
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,370
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,725
<INCOME-TAX>                                        75
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,650
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     64
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,586
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11



</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1****Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements ofAmbassadors International, Inc. of our reports dated March 12, 2008, with respect to theconsolidated financial statements of Ambassadors International, Inc. and the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting of Ambassadors International, Inc., included in thisAnnual Report (Form 10-K), for the year ended December 31, 2007. 1. Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-13405) pertaining to the Amended and Restated1995 Equity Participation Plan of Ambassadors International, Inc.,  2. Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-81203) pertaining to the Amended and Restated1995 Equity Participation Plan of Ambassadors International, Inc.;  3. Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-104280) pertaining to the Amended and Restated1995 Equity Participation Plan of Ambassadors International, Inc.;  4. Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-129404) pertaining to the 2005 Incentive AwardPlan of Ambassadors International, Inc.;  5. Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-143958) pertaining to the Amended and Restated2005 Incentive Award Plan of Ambassadors International, Inc.;  6. Registration Statement (Form S-3/A No. 333-144999) pertaining to the registration of1,734,002 shares of common stock to be issued upon conversion of the 3.75% ConvertibleNotes due 2027./s/ Ernst & Young LLPIrvine, California
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Wage Chronology: Lockheed-California Company (A Division of Lockheed Aircraft Corp.) 1937-67

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Wage Chronology: Lockheed-California Company (A Division of Lockheed Aircraft Corp.) 1937-67 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 1522*,												Washington, D.C: 								U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 										March 1967,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4889,			accessed on September 26, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 764 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 764

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To require the Secretary of the Interior to reissue regulations 
   removing the gray wolf from the list of endangered and threatened 
           wildlife under the Endangered Species Act of 1973.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Trust the Science Act''.

SEC. 2. REMOVING THE GRAY WOLF FROM THE LIST OF ENDANGERED AND 
              THREATENED WILDLIFE.

    Not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of this section, 
the Secretary of the Interior shall reissue the final rule entitled 
``Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Removing the Gray Wolf 
(Canis lupus) From the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife'' and 
published on November 3, 2020 (85 Fed. Reg. 69778).

SEC. 3. NO JUDICIAL REVIEW.

    Reissuance of the final rule under section 2 shall not be subject 
to judicial review.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 30, 2024.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 764

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To require the Secretary of the Interior to reissue regulations 
   removing the gray wolf from the list of endangered and threatened 
           wildlife under the Endangered Species Act of 1973.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                         798,473
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  583,923
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     93,736
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,476,132
<PP&E>                                       6,505,223
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,286,604)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,048,732
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,661,662
<BONDS>                                      3,472,933
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    23,239,795
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,048,732
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               605,491
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  312,580
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             104,692
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,082,762)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,082,762)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.23)
        

</TABLE>
NO. 12-08-00003-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

§ APPEAL FROM THE 145TH

IN THE MATTER OF S.A.,

A JUVENILE § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

§ NACOGDOCHES COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

S.A., a juvenile, appeals from an order modifying the disposition of her case and committing

her to the Texas Youth Commission. S.A.’s counsel filed a brief in compliance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967), and In re D.A.S., 973 S.W.2d

296, 299 (Tex. 1998) (orig. proceeding). We affirm. 

BACKGROUND

Proceedings in the juvenile court began when the State filed a petition alleging that Appellant

had engaged in delinquent conduct or had engaged in conduct indicating a need for supervision. See

TEX. FAM.CODE ANN. § 53.04(a) (Vernon 2002). The trial court appointed counsel for S.A. After

a hearing, the trial court placed S.A. on probation. See TEX.FAM.CODE ANN. § 54.04(d)(1) (Vernon

Supp. 2007). 

The State filed a motion to modify the juvenile court’s disposition in this matter. Following

a hearing, the trial court expanded the conditions of S.A.’s probation to include a requirement that

she attend a program for adolescents. S.A. refused to enroll in that program, and the State again filed

a motion to modify the disposition. Following a hearing, the court committed S.A. to the Texas

Youth Commission. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 54.05(f) (Vernon Supp. 2007). This appeal

followed. 
Counsel for S.A. certified in his motion to withdraw that he provided S.A. with a copy of this brief. S.A. 1

was given time to file her own brief in this cause. The time for filing such a brief has expired, and we have received

no pro se brief.

2

ANALYSIS PURSUANT TO ANDERS V. CALIFORNIA

Appellant’s counsel has filed a brief in compliance with Anders and D.A.S. Counsel states

that he has diligently reviewed the appellate record and that he is well acquainted with the facts of

this case. Counsel’s brief presents a thorough chronological summary of the procedural history of

the case and further states that counsel is unable to present any arguable issues for appeal. See

Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969).

1

We have considered counsel’s brief and have conducted our own independent review of the

record. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 745, 87 S. Ct. at 1400; see also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80,

109 S. Ct. 346, 350, 102 L. Ed. 2d 300 (1988). We have found no reversible error. See Bledsoe v.

State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

CONCLUSION

As required, Appellant’s counsel has moved for leave to withdraw. See Stafford v. State,

813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). Having found no reversible error, we affirm the

judgment of the juvenile court and grant Appellant’s counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw.

Opinion delivered July 9, 2008.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Champion Enterprises, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 29, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Periodic Report),
I, Walter R. Young, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and     
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

|                                                                                                     | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|/s/ WALTER R. YOUNG

Walter R. Young
Chief Executive Officer
Champion Enterprises, Inc.
May 12, 2003 | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
38733.

#### GEORGIA POWER COMPANY v. LIVINGSTON.

*513Decided April 4, 1961

Rehearing denied April 17, 1961.

*Robert R. Forrester, A. L. Kelley, Jr.,*for plaintiff in error.

*Seymour S. Owens,*contra.

Felton, Chief Judge.

The first headnote needs no-further discussion.

Ground 5 of the amended motion was properly overruled. The witness was not qualified to give an opinion as to the value of- a house on the land involved when he had never been inside the house. The testimony was properly excluded notwithstanding the court may have assigned the wrong reason therefor.

Ground 6 of the amended motion complains that the court erred in permitting the condemnee to testify that “it might be possible that it would be a subdivision out there.” One objection to this testimony was that it was speculative. We think the court erred in admitting this testimony. While it is too well known to require citation of authority that a jury may, in determining the value of land, consider all uses to which the property may reasonably be put, the mere possibility that it might be used for subdivision purposes is not enough to authorize a jury to consider the effect of such a possibility in determining the value of the land. At least a reasonable probability must be shown by competent evidence to authorize a jury to consider it in determining value,

(a) Grounds 7, 8 and 9 of the amended motion complain that the charge of the court was confusing and erroneous in its *514statement of the measure of damages. The court used the terms “fair market value,” “fair and reasonable value,” and “just and adequate compensation.” In cases where, as here, there are no unusual circumstances which make the criterion of market value inapplicable, market value is the basis of the determination of the value of land taken and damage to land not taken. *Georgia Power Co. v. Pittman,*92 Ga. App. 673 (89 S. E. 2d 577).

(b) It was also error for the court to charge the jury on the subject of the value of land actually taken. The proceeding is to condemn only an easement over the land to be actually used by the condemnor and not the fee-simple title.

Ground 10 of the amended motion has been abandoned.

Under the facts of this case the court correctly stated the method of determining the consequential damages.

The court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial on special grounds 4, 6, 7, 8 and 9.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Nichols and Bell, JJ., concur.*
**EXHIBIT 21**The active subsidiaries of Day International Group, Inc. are listed below, do businessunder the name under which they are organized, and are included in the consolidated financialstatements of the Company. The names, jurisdiction of incorporation of such subsidiaries, andpercentage of voting securities owned by the Company are set forth below.       **Jurisdiction in** **Percentage of**  **Which** **Voting****Name of Subsidiary** **Incorporated** **Securities owned**Day International, Inc. Delaware 100%Varn International, Inc. Delaware 100% (1)Day International Finance, Inc. Delaware 100% (1)Network Distribution International Massachusetts 100% (1)Network Distribution International, Inc. Massachusetts 100% (2)Day International (U.K.) Holdings United Kingdom 100% (1)Day International (U.K.), Ltd. United Kingdom 100% (3)Duco Holdings Ltd. United Kingdom 100% (3)Duco International Ltd. United Kingdom 100% (4)Varn Holdings PLC United Kingdom 100% (3)Varn Products Co., Ltd. United Kingdom 100% (5)Day International France S.A.R.L France 100% (1)Day International de Mexico S.A. de C.V. Mexico 100% (1)Day International Pty. Ltd. Australia 100% (1)Day International Sdn. Bhd. Malaysia 100% (1)Varn International (Canada) Limited Canada 100% (1)Day International Japan, K.K. Japan 100% (1)R T C do Brasil Ltda. Brazil   55% (1)Day Germany Holdings GmbH Germany 100% (1)Day International (BRD) GmbH Germany 100% (6)ZAO Day International Germany 100% (7)Day International Group GmbH Russia 75% (6)Rotec Verwaltungs GmbH Germany 100% (8)Rotec Huelsensysteme GmbH & Co. KG Germany 100% (8)Rotec Czech s.r.o. Czech Republic   85% (9) (1) Subsidiary of Day International, Inc.(2) Subsidiary of Network Distribution International(3) Subsidiary of Day International (U.K.) Holdings(4) Subsidiary of Duco Holdings Ltd.(5) Subsidiary of Varn Holdings PLC(6) Subsidiary of Day Germany Holdings GmbH(7) Subsidiary of Day International (BRD) GmbH(8) Subsidiary of Day International Group GmbH(9) Subsidiary of Rotec Huelsensysteme GmbH Co. & KG
77
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           4,143
<SECURITIES>                                     3,185
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,119
<ALLOWANCES>                                       179
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,029
<PP&E>                                           4,974
<DEPRECIATION>                                     508
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  29,195
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,039
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        24,632
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,180
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    29,195
<SALES>                                         14,441
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,441
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,582
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,976
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 108
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    895
<INCOME-TAX>                                       510
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                385
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       385
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03
        

</TABLE>