alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 73
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 73 appear at 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001.

§ 73.1075 Canthaxanthin. ( a ) *Identity and specifications.* ( 1 ) The color additive canthaxanthin shall conform in identity and specifications to the requirements of § 73.75(a)(1) and (b).
( 2 ) Color additive mixtures for ingested drug use made with canthaxanthin may contain only those diluents that are suitable and that are listed in this subpart as safe in color additive mixtures for coloring ingested drugs.
( b ) *Uses and restrictions.* Canthaxanthin may be safely used for coloring ingested drugs generally in amounts consistent with good manufacturing practice.
( c ) *Labeling requirements.* The label of the color additive and of any mixtures prepared therefrom intended solely or in part for coloring purposes shall conform to the requirements of § 70.25 of this chapter.
( d ) *Exemption from certification.* Certification of this color additive is not necessary for the protection of the public health, and therefore batches thereof are exempt from the certification requirements of section 721(c) of the act.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Southwall Technologies Inc. (the “Company”), for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mr. Dennis Capovilla, the Principal Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




August 14, 2009
By:
/s/ Dennis F. CapovillaDennis F. CapovillaChief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





In accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K, this certification is being “furnished” as Exhibit 32.1 to the Company's quarterly report and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to the liabilities
of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing.
#### People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Moses Alexander Simms, Defendant-Appellant.

Gen. No. 11,047.

Fourth District.

April 24, 1969.

Glenn O. Fuller, of Decatur, for appellant.

No brief filed for appellee.

SMITH, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant from an order revoking probation and sentencing him to the penitentiary for possession of narcotic drugs. His appeal is based on the proposition that no hearing was held on the petition to revoke within 120 days after it was filed and the warrant issued. Probation was initially granted on a plea of guilty to possession of narcotics.

The petition was filed and the warrant issued on January 25, 1968. He was then in the custody of the sheriff of Sangamon County and during all pertinent times herein was either in such custody or in the penitentiary. On June 21, 1968, a hearing on the probation violation was conducted, the defendant was returned from the penitentiary for such hearing, a motion to dismiss the petition for violation because not heard within 120 days was de*282nied, a supplemental report was filed showing that the defendant had violated his probation by pleading guilty to the unlawful possession of narcotic drugs in Sangamon County on the 18th day of April, 1968. His violation of probation was thus established.

The appellant’s attorney states that the notice of appeal was given prior to the decision of this court in People v. White, 98 Ill App2d 1, 239 NE2d 854, in which we held that the 120-day rule does not apply under the circumstances there related. Counsel also states that this is the only issue on the appeal, that on September 23, 1968, he advised the defendant of the results in the case of People v. White and invited him to suggest any other or additional grounds which he might think were proper on appeal. He received no answer. Under these circumstances, our opinion in White controls and the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

TRAPP, P. J. and CRAVEN, J., concur.
# C_2015127EN.01002602.xml

| 20.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 127/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 127/26

---

Order of the General Court of 23 February 2015 — Seven for all mankind v OHIM — Seven (SEVEN FOR ALL MANKIND)

(Case T-505/14) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark SEVEN FOR ALL MANKIND - Earlier Community and international figurative marks Seven - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2015/C 127/36)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Seven for all mankind LLC (Vernon, California, United States) (represented by: A. Gautier-Sauvagnac, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Seven SpA (Leinì, Italy) (represented by: L. Trevisan, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 9 April 2014 (Case R 1277/2013-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Seven SpA and Seven For All Mankind LLC.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Seven For All Mankind LLC to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Seven For All Mankind LLC to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 292, 1.9.2014.

1

---
<PAGE>
 
The Board of Directors
Affiliated Community Bancorp, Inc.



We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (No. 
333-20181) on Form S-8 of our reports on the consolidated financial statements 
of The Federal Savings Bank as of December 31, 1995 and 1994 and for each of the
years in the two-year period ended December 31, 1995 and on the consolidated
financial statements of Main Street Community Bancorp, Inc. as of and for the
year ended December 31, 1994 which report appears in the December 31, 1996, 
annual report on Form 10-K of Affiliated Community Bancorp.


                                    /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
                                        KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
March 17, 1997
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 8, 2014

No. 04-14-00254-CV

IN RE LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

On July 2, 2014, this court conditionally granted the petition for writ of mandamus filed 

by relator Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company and ordered the trial court to vacate the 

challenged order and enter an order of dismissal within ten days from the date of this court’s

order. 

On July 8, 2014, real party in interest Julian Morales filed an unopposed motion 

requesting that this court abate its prior order to allow for the filing of a motion for rehearing. 

TEX. R. APP. P. 52.9. The real party in interest’s motion is GRANTED. 

This court’s order of July 2, 2014 requiring the trial court to act as directed is 

TEMPORARILY ABATED until further order of this court.

It is so ORDERED on July 8th, 2014. PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 09-03-11925-ZCV, styled Julian T. Morales v. Liberty Mutual Fire 

Insurance Company, pending in the 365th Judicial District Court, Zavala County, Texas, the Honorable Amado J. 

Abascal III presiding.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>                       5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         164,335
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,412
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,375)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       5,700,217
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,217,012)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,937,955
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          621,756
<BONDS>                                      2,921,574
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     394,625
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,937,955
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,935,981
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,560,402
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          (35,809,680)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             555,149
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             20,857,715
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         20,857,715
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                20,857,715
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   245.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   245.14
        

</TABLE>
FORM 10-Q

Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington, D.C.  20549

(Mark One)

[**X**]	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended:  **March 31, 2003**
[   ]	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE 

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _______________ to _______________.

Commission File No. 0-22372.
**GRAND TOYS INTERNATIONAL, INC.**
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)	
**Nevada                                         				**98-0163743                                                          
(State or other jurisdiction of					(I.R.S. Employer

incorporation or organization					Identification No.)
**1710 Route Transcanadienne, Dorval, Quebec, Canada, H9P 1H7**
(Address of principal executive offices)
**(514) 685-2180**
(Registrant's telephone number, including Area Code)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, 

if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
****
Yes	**X**		No    _____

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the Issuer's classes of common equity, as of May 15, 2003: 2,762,698.
** 
**GRAND TOYS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
 
Index to Quarterly Report on Form 10 - Q
Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission**Period ended March 31, 2003
 **ITEMS IN FORM 10 - Q**PAGE**Part I - Financial Information

Item 1.  Consolidated Financial Statements:  
Consolidated Balance Sheets 

at March 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002
2-3
Consolidated Statements of Operations

For The Three Month Period ended March 31, 2003 and 2002
4
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity and ComprehensiveIncome For the Three Month Period ended March 31, 2003 
 

5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

For The Three Month Period ended March 31, 2003 and 2002 
6  
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
7-18  
Item 2.  Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition 
and  Results of Operations
19-24
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risks
24
Item 4.  Controls and Procedures
24**Part II - Other Information   
Item 1.  Legal proceedings
25
Item 2.  Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds
25
Item 3.  Defaults Upon Senior Securities
25
Item 4.  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
25
Item 5.  Other Information
25
Item 6.  Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
25 
Signatures
26-27  
Certifications
28-31******************
39018.

#### TURNER, etc., *et al.*v. MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY *et al.*

Decided October 24, 1961.

*694*C. Winfred Smith,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Telford, Wayne & Smith, Jeff C. Wayne, Smith & Smith, C. E. Smith, Jr., Whelchel, Dunlap <& Gignilliat, William P. Whelchel,*contra,

Jordan, Judge.

The defendants in error have filed a motion to dismiss the writ of error on the ground that this court is without jurisdiction to entertain a joint bill of exceptions upon two unconsolidated cases in which separate verdicts and judgments were rendered in the court below. Under *Code Ann.*§ 6-919, as interpreted by this court in *Scales v. Peevy,*103 Ga. App. 42 (1b) (118 SE2d 193), the plaintiffs in error were authorized to use one bill of exceptions to appeal the judgments complained of since the two cases involved the same issues and the same defendants and were tried together. A formal order of consolidation is not essential where the cases were in fact consolidated for purposes of trial. See Report of the 74th Annual Session of the Georgia Bar Association, 1957, p. 274. The motion to dismiss the writ of error is denied.

It is a well established principle of law in this State that there is no error in directing a verdict which is the inevitable and only legal result of the pleadings and the evidence. *Code*§ 110-104; *City of Abbeville v. Jay,*205 Ga. 743, 749 (55 SE2d 129). Since it was alleged in the petitions of the plaintiffs that the assault, which was the subject matter of the suits, was “wholly unprovoked,” wilful and uncalled for, the burden of proof was on the plaintiffs to prove said allegations in order to recover. *Hanna v. Estridge,*59 Ga. App. 182 (200 SE 174); *Smith v. Cole,*96 Ga. App. 300, 304 (90 SE2d 907). The evidence adduced upon the trial of the cases, however, was not only insufficient to sustain the plaintiffs’ burden of proof on this issue but affirmatively disclosed that the instant assault was effected by the acts and conduct of Jackie Turner, who, while under arrest and in custody of the sheriff’s deputies, feigned the possession of a gun and threatened to shoot the officers.

Accordingly, a verdict was demanded for the defendants and the trial judge did not err in so directing.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Frankum, J., concur.*
# C_2015089EN.01002301.xml

| 16.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/23

---

Judgment of the General Court of 28 January 2015 — Argo Development and Manufacturing v OHIM — Clapbanner (Representation of advertising articles)

(Case T-41/14) (1)

1

((Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing an advertising article - Earlier Community designs - Grounds for invalidity - Novelty - Individual character - Informed user - Degree of freedom of the designer - Different overall impression - Articles 4, 5, 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002))

(2015/C 089/26)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Argo Development and Manufacturing Ltd (Ra’anana, Israel) (represented by: B. Brisset, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented initially by A. Pohlmann, and subsequently by S. Hanne, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Clapbanner Ltd (London, United Kingdom)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 22 October 2013 (Case R 981/2012-3) in relation to invalidity proceedings between Argo Development and Manufacturing Ltd and Clapbanner Ltd.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Argo Development and Manufacturing Ltd to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Argo Development and Manufacturing Ltd to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 129, 28.4.2014.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 101 Referred in House (RFH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 101

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 2005

                 Referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To convey to the town of Frannie, Wyoming, certain land withdrawn by 
                    the Commissioner of Reclamation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF LAND TO THE TOWN OF FRANNIE, WYOMING.

    (a) Conveyance.--Subject to valid existing rights, the Secretary of 
the Interior shall convey by quitclaim deed, without consideration, all 
right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the parcel of 
land described in subsection (b) to the town of Frannie, Wyoming.
    (b) Description of Land.--The parcel of land referred to in 
subsection (a) is the parcel of land withdrawn by the Commissioner of 
Reclamation--
            (1) consisting of approximately 37,500 square feet;
            (2) located in the town of Frannie, Wyoming; and
            (3) more particularly described in the approved Plat of 
        Survey of Frannie Townsite, Wyoming, as the North \1/2\ of 
        Block 26, T. 58 N, R. 97 W.
    (c) Reservation of Mineral Rights.--The conveyance under subsection 
(a) shall be subject to the reservation by the United States of any oil 
and gas rights.
    (d) Revocations.--
            (1) Special use permit.--The special use permit issued by 
        the Commissioner of Reclamation, numbered O-LM-60-L1413, and 
        dated April 20, 1990, is revoked with respect to the land 
        described in subsection (b).
            (2) Secretarial Orders.--The following Secretarial Orders 
        issued by the Commissioner of Reclamation are revoked with 
        respect to the land described in subsection (b):
                    (A) The Secretarial Order for the withdrawal of 
                land for the Shoshone Reclamation Project dated October 
                21, 1913, as amended.
                    (B) The Secretarial Order for the withdrawal of 
                land for the Frannie Townsite Reservation dated April 
                19, 1920.

            Passed the Senate July 26, 2005.

            Attest:

                                             EMILY J. REYNOLDS,

                                                             Secretary.
```
Exhibit 32

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Prandium, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period
ended June 29, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Hugh G. Hilton, as Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Robert T. Trebing, Jr., as Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                     
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|       | /S/ HUGH G. HILTON              | 
|------ | ------------------------------- | 
|       |                                 | 
|Name:  | Hugh G. Hilton                  | 
|Title: | Interim Chief Executive Officer | 
|Date:  | August 13, 2003                 | 
|       |                                 | 
|       | /S/ ROBERT T. TREBING, JR.      | 
|       |                                 | 
|Name:  | Robert T. Trebing, Jr.          | 
|Title: | Chief Financial Officer         | 
|Date:  | August 13, 2003                 |