alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016191EN.01002302.xml

| 30.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 191/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 191/23

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 April 2016 — Ben Ali v Council

(Case T-200/14) (1)

1

((Common Foreign and Security Policy - Restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Tunisia - Freezing of funds - Legal basis - Inclusion of the name of the applicant on the basis of new grounds following the annulment of the earlier freezing of funds measures - Obligation to state reasons - Right to property - Proportionality - Error of fact - Rights of the defence - Right to effective judicial protection - Misuse of powers - Right to life - Right to a family life - Non-contractual liability))

(2016/C 191/29)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Mehdi Ben Tijani Ben Haj Hamda Ben Haj Hassen Ben Ali (Saint-Étienne-du-Rouvray, France) (represented by: A. de Saint Remy, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: G. Étienne and A. de Elera-San Miguel Hurtado, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Council Decision 2014/49/CFSP of 30 January 2014, amending Decision 2011/72/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Tunisia (OJ 2011 L 28, p. 38), and of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 81/2014 of 30 January 2014 implementing Regulation (EU) No 101/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Tunisia (OJ 2014 L 28, p. 2), in so far as those measures concern the applicant, and, secondly, an application for damages.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Mehdi Ben Tijani Ben Haj Hamda Ben Haj Hassen Ben Ali to bear his own costs as well as those incurred by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Mehdi Ben Tijani Ben Haj Hamda Ben Haj Hassen Ben Ali to bear his own costs as well as those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ C 202, 30.6.2014.

1

---
Editorial Note on Part 73
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 73 appear at 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001.

§ 73.340 Paprika. ( a ) *Identity.* ( 1 ) The color additive paprika is the ground dried pod of mild capsicum (*Capsicum annuum* L.). The definition of paprika in this paragraph is for the purpose of identity as a color additive only and shall not be construed as setting forth an official standard for paprika under section 401 of the act.
( 2 ) Color additive mixtures made with paprika may contain as diluents only those substances listed in this subpart as safe and suitable in color additive mixtures for coloring foods.
( b ) *Uses and restrictions.* Paprika may be safely used for the coloring of foods generally, in amounts consistent with good manufacturing practice, except that it may not be used to color foods for which standards of identity have been promulgated under section 401 of the act, unless the use of added color is authorized by such standards.
( c ) *Labeling.* The color additive and any mixtures intended solely or in part for coloring purposes prepared therefrom shall bear, in addition to the other information required by the act, labeling in accordance with the provisions of § 70.25 of this chapter.
( d ) *Exemption from certification.* Certification of this color additive is not necessary for the protection of the public health, and therefore batches thereof are exempt from the certification requirements of section 721(c) of the act.
§ 630.35 Requalification of previously deferred donors. Establishments may determine a deferred donor to be eligible as a donor of blood and blood components if, at the time of the current collection, the donor meets the eligibility criteria in this part, except for the record of the previous deferral, and you determine that the criteria that were the basis for the previous deferral are no longer applicable. Criteria for the previous deferral are no longer applicable if the following conditions are met: ( a ) The previous deferral was for a defined period of time and that time period has passed, or the deferral was otherwise temporary, such as a deferral based on eligibility criteria described in §§ 630.10(f)(1) through (5) or 630.15(b)(4); or
( b ) For a donor deferred for reasons other than under § 610.41(a) of this chapter, you determine that the donor has met criteria for requalification by a method or process found acceptable for such purpose by FDA.
#### § 522.960 Flumethasone injectable dosage forms.
Exhibit
31.4





CERTIFICATIONS





I, John
G. Cooper, certify that:





1.      I
have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2009 of Discovery Laboratories, Inc.; and





2.      Based on
my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report.





Date:  April
      30, 2009
              /s/ John G. CooperJohn
      G. CooperExecutive
      Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer
# C_2014315EN.01004002.xml

| 15.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/40

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Krefeld (Germany) lodged on 4 July 2014 — Jaouad El Majdoub v CarsOnTheWeb.Deutschland GmbH

(Case C-322/14)

2014/C 315/65

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Landgericht Krefeld

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Jaouad El Majdoub

Applicant:

Defendant: CarsOnTheWeb.Deutschland GmbH

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Does so-called ‘click wrapping’ fulfil the requirements for there to be a communication by electronic means within the meaning of Article 23(2) of Regulation No 44/2001? (1)

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2001 L 12, p. 1).

1

---
§ 74.1303 FD&C Red No. 3. ( a ) *Identity and specifications.* ( 1 ) The color additive FD&C Red No. 3 shall conform in identity and specifications to the requirements of § 74.303(a)(1) and (b).
( 2 ) Color additive mixtures for ingested drug used made with FD&C Red No. 3 may contain only those diluents that are suitable and that are listed in part 73 of this chapter as safe for use in color additive mixtures for coloring ingested drugs.
( b ) *Uses and restrictions.* FD&C Red No. 3 may be safely used for coloring ingested drugs in amounts consistent with good manufacturing practice.
( c ) *Labeling.* The label of the color additive and any mixtures prepared therefrom intended solely or in part for coloring purposes shall conform to the requirements of § 70.25 of this chapter.
( d ) *Certification.* All batches of FD&C Red No. 3 shall be certified in accordance with regulations in part 80 of this chapter.
#### § 803.13 Do I need to submit reports in English?

Yes. You must submit all reports required by this part in English.
[LOGO]

I, Sam Reed, Secretary of State of the State of Washington and custodian of its seal, hereby issue this

certificate
that according to records on file in this office,

Articles
of Amendment to

MACKIE DESIGNS INC.

a Washington corporation, whereby the corporate name is changed to

LOUD TECHNOLOGIES INC

was received and filed by this office on September 12, 2003.



|[SEAL] |  | Given under my hand and
the Seal of the State of
Washington at Olympia,
the State Capital
|------ |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|       |  | Sam Reed, Secretary of State                                                             

---



FILED
SECRETARY OF STATE
SEP 12 2003
STATE OF WASHINGTON

ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT

TO

ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

OF

MACKIE DESIGNS INC.

Pursuant to RCW 23B.10.020, the undersigned corporation adopts the following Articles of Amendment to its Articles of Incorporation:

FIRST:The name of the corporation is Mackie Designs Inc.

SECOND:The Articles of Incorporation are hereby amended as follows:

ARTICLE I

Name

The
name of this Corporation is LOUD Technologies Inc.

THIRD:The amendment does not provide for an exchange, reclassification, or cancellation of issued shares.

FOURTH:In accordance with the provisions of RCW 23B.10.020, the amendment was approved and adopted by the Board of Directors on
August 6, 2003. Shareholder action was not required.

FIFTH:The amendment shall be effective September 15, 2003.

Dated
this 29 day of August, 2003

| |  | MACKIE DESIGNS, INC.
| |  | --------------------
| |  | By:                 

---
CE-CP-SPRM-NY001-STD-0023 COMMENT 0E

496 Federal Register / Vol. 49, No.2 I Wednesday, January 4, 1984 / Notices 

Office of Conservation and 

Renewable Enerav 

ll.lOcke\ nloa.I;t.-CP-SPAM. 006-029] 

Energy Conservation Program for 

Consumer Products; State N.otlces of 

Petition 

CorreC!lUlI 

In FR Doc. 83-34311 beginning on page 

56996 in the issue of Tuesday, December 

27, 1983, make the following cor:ections: 

1. On page 56997, in the table In the 

entry for "Illinois", under the category 

for "Room air conditioner", delete the 

"XU. 

2. In the entry for "Washington", 

delete all "X's" under all categories. 

BlLUNG COOE ,505-0, .... 

496 Federal Register / Vol. 49, No.2 I Wednesday, January 4, 1984 / Notices 

Office of Conservation and 

Renewable Enerav 

ll.lOcke\ nloa.I;t.-CP-SPAM. 006-029] 

Energy Conservation Program for 

Consumer Products; State N.otlces of 

Petition 

CorreC!lUlI 

In FR Doc. 83-34311 beginning on page 

56996 in the issue of Tuesday, December 

27, 1983, make the following cor:ections: 

1. On page 56997, in the table In the 

entry for "Illinois", under the category 

for "Room air conditioner", delete the 

"XU. 

2. In the entry for "Washington", 

delete all "X's" under all categories. 

BlLUNG COOE ,505-0, ....
No-Till

Challenge

Are YOU ready?

Take the
Whether part of your conservation plan or not, 

long-term no-till offers many environmental 

and economic benefits:

•	Reduced soil erosion

•	Increased soil quality

•	Improved water infiltration

•	Reduced fuel, labor and machinery costs

Many producers think they are capturing 

those benefits, but they are not.

Are you?
No-Till

Challenge?

Turn the page to find out!

Can you pass the

Does your conservation plan

include no-till? 

Do you consider yourself 

a no-till farmer?
Do you use a 

rotary harrow on 

your no-till ground?

YES: NO: turn to 

pg. 7

turn to 

next pg.

1
Do you use a 

row crop cultivator

on your no-till 

ground?

YES: NO: turn to 

pg. 7

turn to 

next pg.

2
Do you use

a vertical tillage 

tool on your no-till 

ground?

YES: NO: turn to 

pg. 7

turn to 

next pg.

3
Do you incorporate 

manure with

disk covers

on your no-till 

ground?

YES: NO: turn to 

pg. 7

turn to 

next pg.

4
Do you till your 

ground every 

other year or 

once in four years?

YES: NO: turn to 

pg. 7

turn to 

pg. 11

5

 You failed the

No-Till

Challenge

Sorry!

Since you answered yes to at least one of the previous 

questions, this indicates you are not following the NRCS 

requirements for no-till. Please visit your local NRCS office 

to find out how you can fully benefit from a no-till system.

7
There is a misconception that if you leave a field 

covered with residue, you are a no-till farmer. 

No-till is not just about leaving residue on the soil 

surface. It is also about stopping the disturbance 

of the soil structure. Any tillage, regardless of its 

depth, will undo all the benefits of any previous 

no-till farming if it fractures the consolidated soil 

and breaks the macropores. This includes losing 

any improvements in soil quality gained by 

previous investments in no-till. 

Why did I fail?

8
9

Looking for help?

If you need additional information about no-till 

farming, your conservation plan or other conservation-related questions, please contact your local 

USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service 

(NRCS) office. Our trained staff can help you 

determine if you are following the requirements 

in your conservation plan as well as provide more 

information about no-till farming methods. If you 

are not following your plan, you may lose eligibility 

for USDA benefits. You may also visit NRCS on 

the web at: 

www.ia.nrcs.usda.gov

 You passed the

No-Till

Challenge

Way to go!

Based on the questions in this challenge, you are following basic NRCS no-till requirements and capturing the 

economic and environmental benefits of a no-till system. 

For verification, visit your local NRCS office.

11

Helping People Help the Land

www.ia.nrcs.usda.gov

USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than March 9, 2010.

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia**                     (Michael E. Collins, Senior Vice President) 100 North 6th Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19105-1521:                

*1. Allen E. Ertel and Catharine K. Ertel*, both of Montoursville Pennsylvania; Edward Ertel, Washington, D.C.; Amy Etrel, Jersey City, New Jersey; and Firetree, Ltd, Williamsport, Pennsylvania; to retain voting shares of Woodlands Financial Services Company, and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of Woodlands Bank, both of Williamsport, Pennsylvania.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 17, 2010.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2010-3336 Filed 2-19-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
#### § 710.2 Time for registration.

The owner or operator of an establishment entering into the manufacture or packaging of a cosmetic product should register his establishment within 30 days after the operation begins.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7601 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7601

To amend the Defense Production Act of 1950 to prohibit the use of the 
   authorities under title I and title III of such Act for electric 
                   vehicles or related technologies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 8, 2024

  Mr. Perry introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Defense Production Act of 1950 to prohibit the use of the 
   authorities under title I and title III of such Act for electric 
                   vehicles or related technologies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Bullets Not Batteries Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON THE USE OF AUTHORITIES FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLES AND 
              RELATED TECHNOLOGY.

    Section 104 of the Defense Production Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C. 4514) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(c) Electric Vehicles and Related Technology.--The authorities 
provided under this title and title III may not be used with respect 
to--
            ``(1) electric vehicles;
            ``(2) electric vehicle batteries;
            ``(3) electric vehicle charging stations or other electric 
        vehicle infrastructure; or
            ``(4) obtaining critical minerals that will be used for the 
        manufacturing of any item described under paragraph (1), (2), 
        or (3).''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 640.83 General requirements. ( a ) *Preservative.* The final product shall not contain a preservative.
( b ) *Storage of bulk solution.* After all processing steps have been completed, the sterile bulk solution shall be stored in a manner that will ensure the continued sterility of the product, and at a temperature that shall not exceed the recommended storage temperature of the final product prescribed in § 610.53 of this chapter.
[42 FR 27582, May 31, 1977]
October 11, 2011

STEAM ELECTRIC ELG 

RULEMAKING

UMRA AND FEDERALISM IMPLICATIONS: 

CONSULTATION MEETING

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
TECHNOLOGIES UNDER CONSIDERATION & 

PRELIMINARY COMPLIANCE COSTS

(Costs for plant capacity of 50-600 MW)

A - 1

 FGD wastewater

 Option 1: No change to ELG (No cost)

 Option 2: Chemical precipitation ($0.9 - $3.2 million/yr)

 Option 3: Chemical precipitation + Biological ($1.7 - $4.5 million/yr)

 Option 4: Chemical precipitation + Evaporation ($4.2 - $10.2 million/yr)

 Leachate from landfills/ponds containing coal combustion residues

 Option 1: No change to ELG (No cost)

 Option 2: Chemical precipitation ($0.5 - $1.6 million/yr)

 Option 3: Chemical precipitation + Biological ($1.1 - $2.5 million/yr)

 Note: The costs shown are for a new treatment system and do not take into account 

the savings associated with ceasing operation of an existing treatment system (e.g., 

avoiding construction of a new settling pond or ceasing operation of an existing 

settling pond designed to comply with current effluent limits for total suspended 

solids).
TECHNOLOGIES UNDER CONSIDERATION & 

PRELIMINARY COMPLIANCE COSTS

(Costs for plant capacity of 50-600 MW)

A - 2

 Fly ash

 Option 1: No change to ELG (No cost)

 Option 2: Zero discharge of fly ash transport water, based on conversion to 

dry fly ash transport ($0.3 - $2.2 million/yr)

 Bottom ash

 Option 1: No change to ELG (No cost)

 Option 2: Zero discharge of bottom ash transport water, based on either 

complete recycle of transport water or conversion to dry bottom ash 

transport ($0.9 - $3 million/yr)

 Note: The costs shown are for a new treatment system do not take into account the 

savings associated with ceasing operation of an existing treatment system (e.g., 

avoiding construction of a new settling pond or ceasing operation of an existing 

settling pond designed to comply with current effluent limits for total suspended 

solids).
TECHNOLOGIES UNDER CONSIDERATION & 

PRELIMINARY COMPLIANCE COSTS

(Costs for plant capacity of 50-600 MW)

A - 3

 Flue gas mercury control wastes (e.g., activated carbon injection)

 Option 1: No change to ELG (no cost)

 Option 2: Zero discharge, based on dry handling practices (minimal cost, if 

any)

 Gasification wastewater

 Option 1: No change to ELG (no cost)

 Option 2: Evaporation (no cost)

 Option 3: Evaporation + Cyanide destruction (minimal cost)
#### § 640.66 Immunization of donors.

If specific immunization of a donor is to be performed, the selection, scheduling and administration of the antigen, and the evaluation of each donor's clinical response, shall be by the responsible physician. Any material used for immunization shall be either a product licensed under section 351 of the Public Health Service Act for such purpose or one specifically approved by the Director, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration. Immunization procedures shall be on file at each plasmapheresis center where immunizations are performed.

[38 FR 32089, Nov. 20, 1973, as amended at 49 FR 23834, June 8, 1984; 55 FR 11013, Mar. 26, 1990; 80 FR 29905, May 22, 2015]
132 STAT. 4370 PUBLIC LAW 115–286—DEC. 6, 2018 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3230: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018): 

July 16, considered and passed House. 

Nov. 15, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 115–286 

115th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 915 Center 

Avenue in Payette, Idaho, as the ‘‘Harmon Killebrew Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. HARMON KILLEBREW POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 915 Center Avenue in Payette, Idaho, shall be 

known and designated as the ‘‘Harmon Killebrew Post Office 

Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Harmon Killebrew Post Office Building’’. 

Approved December 6, 2018. 

Dec. 6, 2018 

[H.R. 3230] 


ralbany on LAP520R082 with PUB LAWS PDF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0213

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JOSHUA GLEN REID,

Defendant and Appellant. 

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including April 11, 2022, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 4 2022

03/04/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0213