alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 73
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 73 appear at 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001.

§ 73.1125 Potassium sodium copper chloropyhllin (chlorophyllin-copper complex). ( a ) *Identity.* ( 1 ) The color additive potassium sodium copper chlorophyllin is a green to black powder obtained from chlorophyll by replacing the methyl and phytyl ester groups with alkali and replacing the magnesium with copper. The source of the chlorophyll is dehydrated alfalfa.
( 2 ) Color additive mixtures for drug use made with potassium sodium copper chlorophyllin may contain only those diluents that are suitable and that are listed in this subpart as safe for use in color additive mixtures for coloring drugs.
( b ) *Specifications.* Potassium sodium copper chlorophyllin shall conform to the following specifications and shall be free from impurities other than those named to the extent that such other impurities may be avoided by good manufacturing practice: Moisture, not more than 5.0 percent. Nitrogen, not more than 5.0 percent. pH of 1 percent solution, 9 to 11. Total copper, not less than 4 percent and not more than 6 percent. Free copper, not more than 0.25 percent. Iron, not more than 0.5 percent. Lead (as Pb)), not more than 20 parts per million. Arsenic (as As), not more than 5 parts per million. Ratio, absorbance at 405 mμ to absorbance at 630 mμ, not less than 3.4 and not more than 3.9. Total color, not less than 75 percent.
( c ) *Uses and restrictions.* Potassium sodium copper chlorophyllin may be safely used for coloring dentifrices that are drugs at a level not to exceed 0.1 percent. Authorization for this use shall not be construed as waiving any of the requirements of section 505 of the act with respect to the drug in which it is used.
( d ) *Labeling.* The label of the color additive and any mixtures prepared therefrom intended solely or in part for coloring purposes shall conform to the requirements of § 70.25 of this chapter.
( e ) *Exemption from certification.* Certification of this color additive is not necessary for the protection of the public health and therefore batches thereof are exempt from the certification requirements of section 721(c) of the act.
.’

; ._.... * ;

._. . **i- \**  **’** , Qfter a oonelderatlon ai the rq@iGk∈ ths arldolss OF lnoorporrltlon and .thonature of the aonet~uc-: t.io!l all4O~erTatioR

OF t.119

plant, will you pleaeo f.?for.a xm whsthm, $n pour op%niozi, the oyertition0::auoh co+ oern in the stota of Tcvas would bo In violation ot the tcrfi5

**or** the 6tmto 0c ch0 mte of Toxss regiitating an& aontr0lU.n~ truots and m0nopo3.l6s.~ glvven us br the attvP&ors for tho qoqx~~+, St appeare **that** 

### the . gechesliutanc

Zmduots Cozpany has bea or&enizod et the tiet3aoo . i$ tho PeCeral Coverrant, a5 a aon-profit c.rporation.whiGh.fe tosupervise anQ a;anrrgo tha zwiui'aoturc

OF 6ynthobSo rubber 63&ntic41 for the n~t~orr's

wax am?.% l At;the'rogkt or thO PeFollcxal Ciovox&neat.tho

oto& omom~hip of fho Uechcn Dutene PrMuots Conlpan& ha& bea apporfive OS.1oGq.peniel3 eJlu!serntaa

in your lettoT (l} bsocusa it is antiok,ostobthat the rax inso the m6nuf6Otuse afthe ayflthatic zubb6r' . 1s to ba aupplloii froa the oiz refineries of thee0 poqwnlos and (2) beoaws the30 saw3 &xupanieo nre to farnP3h ikos wong thclr6i~ployOes

the poroaa-,Glvith the nooostrarydhcmlcal, . **OqjiRaOriRp; &nd**  **ol;har I;oChuloaa.**  **Bkfil enb**  **trainin$j I%**  dircottig tbbpPopoaea llRdcirtnkln~. The cultire

projeot $6 t&&lctti?a by andQhall be opt?rstGa unaez. ttso(ttreot

-.suposvlslcu¶

allaOontYol ,of PeiIaral

agenaida fn tui%heraticit of ooeential waz wrjc. Unitsr .' cuchGi~ourzit3nccs, x76QTQ OP the opiaion i&It wle Gnti-truat. l%?eOf Taxas h3ve no eppliarrtion tq the gropowI ogOzet1one .' of the'E6chasBut6nq produote company, RG outlina8.



## Your5 vepy t%w.y .
§ 168.111 Dextrose monohydrate. ( a ) Dextrose monohydrate is purified and crystallized D-glucose containing one molecule of water of crystallization with each molecule of D-glucose.
( b ) The food shall meet the following specifications: ( 1 ) The total solids content is not less than 90.0 percent mass/mass (m/m), and the reducing sugar content (dextrose equivalent), expressed as D-glucose, is not less than 99.5 percent m/m calculated on a dry basis.
( 2 ) The sulfated ash content is not more than 0.25 percent m/m (calculated on a dry basis), and the sulfur dioxide content is not more than 20 mg/kg.
( c ) The name of the food is “Dextrose monohydrate” or “Dextrose” or alternatively, “______ sugar monohydrate” or “______ sugar”, with the blank to be filled with the name of the food source, for example, “Corn sugar monohydrate” or “Corn sugar”.
( d ) For purposes of this section, the methods of analysis to be used to determine if the food meets the specifications of paragraph (b) (1) and (2) of this section are the following sections in “Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists,” 13th Ed. (1980), which is incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the AOAC INTERNATIONAL, 481 North Frederick Ave., suite 500, Gaithersburg, MD 20877, or may be examined at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .* ( 1 ) Total solids content, 31.005.
( 2 ) Reducing sugar content, section 31.220(a).
( 3 ) Sulfated ash content, section 31.216.
( 4 ) Sulfur dioxide content, sections 20.106-20.111.
[42 FR 14479, Mar. 15, 1977, as amended at 47 FR 11834, Mar. 19, 1982; 49 FR 10103, Mar. 19, 1984; 54 FR 24896, June 12, 1989; 58 FR 2886, Jan. 6, 1993; 63 FR 14035, Mar. 24, 1998]
# C_2015398EN.01004701.xml

| 30.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 398/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 398/47

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 October 2015 — CBM v OHIM — Aeronautica Militare (Trecolore)

(Case T-227/14) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark Trecolore - Earlier Community and national word and figurative marks FRECCE TRICOLORI - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2015/C 398/59)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: CBM Creative Brands Marken GmbH (Zurich, Switzerland) (represented by: U. Lüken, M. Grundmann and N. Kerger, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Aeronautica Militare — Stato Maggiore (Rome, Italy)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 January 2014 (Case R 253/2013-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Aeronautica Militare — Stato Maggiore and CBM Creative Brands Marken GmbH.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders CBM Creative Brands Marken GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders CBM Creative Brands Marken GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 245, 28.7.2014.

1

---
# C_2016232EN.01001602.xml

| 27.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 232/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 232/16

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 May 2016 — GRE v EUIPO (Mark1)

(Case T-844/14) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Application for EU figurative mark Mark1 - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2016/C 232/21)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: GRE Grand River Enterprises Deutschland GmbH (Kloster Lehnin, Germany) (represented by: I. Memmler and S. Schulz, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 October 2014 (Case R 648/2014-1) concerning an application for registration of the figurative sign Mark1 as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders GRE Grand River Enterprises Deutschland GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders GRE Grand River Enterprises Deutschland GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

---

(1)  OJ C 65, 23.2.2015.

1

---
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

The certifications set forthbelow are hereby submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuantto, and solely for the purpose of complying with, Section 1350 of Chapter 63 ofTitle 18 of the United States Code in connection with the filing on the datehereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30,2007.

 

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies inhis capacity as an officer of Citizens Bancshares Corporation and subsidiary(the “Company”) that, to his knowledge on the date of this certification, theQuarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company atthe end of such period and the results of operations of the Company for suchperiod.

 

 
| Date:  | November 14, 2007 | By:                                   | /s/ James E. Young        |   |
|--------|-------------------|---------------------------------------|---------------------------|--------|
|   |              | James E. Young                        |
|   |              | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |              |                                  |
|   |              |                                  |
| Date:  | November 14, 2007 | By:                                   |  /s/  Cynthia N. Day |   |
|   |              | Cynthia N. Day                        |
|   |              | Senior Executive Vice President and   |
|   |              | Chief Operating Officer               |
|   |              |                                  |
|   |              |                                  |
| Date:  | November 14, 2007 | By:                                   |  /s/  Samuel J. Cox  |   |
|   |              | Samuel J. Cox                         |
|   |              | Executive Vice President and          |
|   |              | Chief Financial Officer               |
|        |                   |                                       |                           |        |  |

 

----
§ 582.5443 Magnesium sulfate. ( a ) *Product.* Magnesium sulfate.
( b ) *Conditions of use.* This substance is generally recognized as safe when used in accordance with good manufacturing or feeding practice.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-4201

_____________________________

ARNOLD JAMES ODOM,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Belated Appeal—Original Jurisdiction.

December 12, 2018

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is denied on the merits.

LEWIS, WINOKUR, and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Bruce Miller, Public Defender, and Charles E. Russell, Assistant 

Public Defender, Shalimar, for Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
§ 582.3089 Sorbic acid. ( a ) *Product.* Sorbic acid.
( b ) *Conditions of use.* This substance is generally recognized as safe when used in accordance with good manufacturing or feeding practice.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 23.2


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of Directors
Trendwest Resorts, Inc.:

We consent to the use of our report incorporated herein by reference.

KPMG LLP

Seattle, Washington
June 29, 1999
PUBLIC LAW 115–316—DEC. 14, 2018 132 STAT. 4433 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4407: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018): 

July 16, considered and passed House. 

Nov. 15, considered and passed Senate, amended. 

Dec. 11, House concurred in Senate amendments. 

Æ 

Public Law 115–316 

115th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 3s101 

Rockwell Street in Warrenville, Illinois, as the ‘‘Corporal Jeffrey Allen Williams 

Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. CORPORAL JEFFREY ALLEN WILLIAMS POST OFFICE 

BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 3s101 Rockwell Street in Warrenville, Illinois, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Corporal Jeffrey Allen Williams Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Corporal Jeffrey Allen Williams Post Office Building’’. 

Approved December 14, 2018. 

Dec. 14, 2018 

[H.R. 4407] 


dkrause on DSKBC28HB2PROD with PUBLAWS
# C_2015389EN.01005801.xml

| 23.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 389/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 389/58

---

Order of the General Court of 8 October 2015 — Nieminen v Council

(Case T-464/14 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Promotion - 2010 and 2011 promotion procedures - Decision not to promote the appellant to grade AD 12 - Right to a fair hearing - Rights of defence - Scope of the judicial review at first instance - Manifest error of assessment - No error of law and of distortion - Appeal manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2015/C 389/66)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Risto Nieminen (Kraainem, Belgium) (represented by: initially, M. de Abreu Caldas, D. de Abreu Caldas and J.-N. Louis, and subsequently, J.-N. Louis, lawyers)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and E. Rebasti, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 10 April 2014 in Nieminen v Council (F-81/12, ECR-SC, EU:F:2014:50), seeking to have that judgment set aside.

Nieminen

Council

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Mr Risto Nieminen shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Risto Nieminen shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 261, 11.8.2014.

1

---
# C_2016243EN.01002901.xml

| 4.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 243/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 243/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of 25 May 2016 — Commission v McCarron Poultry

(Case T-226/14) (1)

1

((Arbitration clause - Fifth Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (1998-2002) - Contract relating to ‘Energy, environment and sustainable development’ - Termination of the contract - Reimbursement of part of the amount advanced - Default interest - Procedure by default))

(2016/C 243/29)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented initially by L. Cappelletti and F. Moro, subsequently by F. Moro, acting as Agents, and by R. van der Hout, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: McCarron Poultry Ltd (Killacorn Emyvale, Ireland)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action under Article 272 TFEU seeking an order that the defendant reimburse part of the amount advanced by the Commission under contract NNE5/1999/20229, together with default interest.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Orders McCarron Poultry Ltd to repay to the Commission the sum of EUR 900 662,25, plus accrued default interest calculated at the rate of 2,50 % per annum from 1 December 2010 until the date of full payment of the debt; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Orders McCarron Poultry Ltd to repay to the Commission the sum of EUR 900 662,25, plus accrued default interest calculated at the rate of 2,50 % per annum from 1 December 2010 until the date of full payment of the debt;

| 2. | Orders McCarron Poultry to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders McCarron Poultry to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 212, 7.7.2014.

1

---
On March 27, 2008, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a final rulemaking 

entitled "Completeness Findings for Section 1 10(a) State Implementation Plans; 8-Hour Ozone 

NAAQS," making a finding that each state had either submitted or failed to submit a complete 

State Implementation Plan (SIP) that provided the basic program elements of section 110(a)(2) 

of the Clean Air Act (CAA) necessary to implement the 1997 8-hour ozone National Ambient 

Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). Florida's SIP infrastructure submission for the 1997 &hour 

ozone standard was determined to be complete for all elements with the exception of section 

1 10(a)(2)(G) related to emergency powers. As a result, EPA issued a finding of fbilure to submit 

for this infrastructure element. Specifically, section 110(a)(2)(G) relates to the requirement for 

states to provide emergency authority comparable to that in section 303 of the CAA, and 

adequate contingency plans to implement such authority. 

This letter is to request conditional approval of Florida's 1997 8-hour ozone standard SIP 

infrastructure submission, pending submittal by the state of a proposed SIP revision to address 

section 110(a)(2)(G) of the CAA and thus correct the deficiency of Florida's SIP for this 

infrastructure element. Specifically, the Department of Environmental Protection PEP) hereby 

commits to propose a revision to Florida's SIP to address the requirements of section 

110(a)(2)(G) prior to such time that EPA is obligated per a settlement agreement signed on 

November 30,20 1 1, to implement a federal implementation plan (FIP). 
The schedule for this proposed SIP revision is as follows: 

1. Publish SIP revision for public comment - April 20 12 

2. Address comments received - May/June 20 12 

3. Submit final SIP revision for approval - June 20 12 

If you have any questions on this request or need additional information, please contact Chad 

Stevens at (850) 717-9089. Thank you for your continued support of our efforts to implement 

the CAA in Florida. 

Sincerely, 

Brian Accardo, Deputy Director 

Division of Air Resource Management 

cc: Scott Davis, Chief, Air Planning Branch, EPA Region 4 (by electronic mail)
# C_2019051EN.01000101.xml

| 8.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 51/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51/1

---

Statement by the European Parliament relating to Regulation (EU) 2019/216 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the apportionment of tariff rate quotas included in the WTO schedule of the Union following the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the Union, and amending Council Regulation (EC) No 32/2000 (1)

(2019/C 51/01)

The European Parliament attaches great importance to being kept fully informed during the preparation of delegated acts and, in particular, to paragraph 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making, which provides that, in order to ensure equal access to all information, the European Parliament and Council shall receive all documents at the same time as Member States' experts.

---

(1)  OJ L 38, 8.2.2019, p. 1.

---
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 24.2

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

         The undersigned Director of The Ackerley Group, Inc. ("Company")
appoints each of Barry A. Ackerley, Denis M. Curley and Keith W. Ritzmann her
true and lawful attorney and agent, in name and on behalf of the undersigned, in
any and all registration statements (including without limitation, any
registration statement filed pursuant to Rule 462(b) promulgated under the
Securities Act of 1933) and any and all amendments and post-effective amendments
and exhibits thereto in connection with the offering by the Company of shares of
its common stock under the Company's Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the
Company's Employees Stock Option Plan, and to do any and all acts and things and
execute any and all instruments which the attorney and agent may deem necessary
or advisable in connection therewith, without the other and with full power of
substitution and revocation, and hereby ratifying all that any such attorney or
his substitute may do by virtue hereby.

         Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of
1933, this Power of Attorney has been signed by the following person in the
capacity indicated on this 19th day of November, 1999.

                                  /s/ Gail A. Ackerley
                                  -----------------------------------------
                                  Gail A. Ackerley
Exhibit 32.2
 
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Mark T. DetillionMark T. DetillionChief Financial Officer  The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany this Report pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company,
whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in
such filing.