alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 July 31, 2008
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Michael BrodskyMichael BrodskyChief Executive OfficerJuly 31, 2008
    
    By:
    
    /s/ James A. BurkJames A. BurkChief Financial Officer
# C_2016462EN.01001402.xml

| 12.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 462/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 462/14

---

Judgment of the General Court of 27 October 2016 — ECB v Cerafogli

(Case T-787/14 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Civil service - ECB Staff - Access to documents - Documents relating to the dispute between the parties in the proceedings - Partial refusal of access - Rule of correspondence between the application and the complaint - Plea of illegality))

(2016/C 462/16)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: European Central Bank (represented initially by E. Carlini, M. López Torres and F. Malfrère, and subsequently by E. Carlini and F. Malfrère, acting as Agents, assisted by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Maria Concetta Cerafogli (Rome, Italy) (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings:

Intervener in support of the applicant: European Commission (represented initially by J. Currall and G. Gattinara, and subsequently by G. Gattinara, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 18 September 2014 in Cerafogli v ECB (F-26/12, EU:F:2014:218) seeking to have that judgment set aside.

Cerafogli

ECB

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders the European Central Bank (ECB) to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Ms Maria Concetta Cerafogli; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Central Bank (ECB) to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Ms Maria Concetta Cerafogli;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 46, 9.2.2015.

1

---
# C_2018328EN.01004002.xml

| 17.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/40

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2018 — Prysmian and Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi v Commission

(Case T-475/14) (1)

((Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - European market for power cables - Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU - Single and continuous infringement - Illegal nature of the inspection decision - Reasonable time - Principle of sound administration - Principle of personal responsibility - Joint and several liability for payment of the fine - Sufficient proof of the infringement - Duration of the infringement - Fines - Proportionality - Equal treatment - Unlimited jurisdiction))

(2018/C 328/55)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Prysmian SpA (Milan, Italy) and Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi Srl (Milan) (represented by: C. Tesauro, F. Russo, L. Armati and C. Toniolo, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by: C. Giolito, L. Malferrari, P. Rossi and H. van Vliet, and subsequently by C. Giolito, P. Rossi and H. van Vliet, acting as Agents, and by S. Kingston, Barrister)

Intervener in support of the applicants: The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (New York, New York, United States) (represented by: W. Deselaers, J. Koponen and A. Mangiaracina, lawyers)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Pirelli & C. SpA (Milan) (represented by: M. Siragusa, G. Rizza, P. Ferrari, F. Moretti and A. Fava, lawyers)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of Commission Decision C(2014) 2139 final of 2 April 2014 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 [TFEU] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case AT.39610 — Power cables) in so far as it concerns the applicants and, in the alternative, a reduction of the fine imposed on the applicants.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Prysmian SpA and Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi Srl to bear their own costs and to pay those of the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Prysmian SpA and Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi Srl to bear their own costs and to pay those of the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and Pirelli & C. SpA to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and Pirelli & C. SpA to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 315, 15.9.2014.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Office of the Secretary

# ACTION:

Meeting Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Labor Advisory Committee for Trade Negotiation and Trade Policy.

Date, Time, Place: March 16, 2010; 10:30 a.m.-11:30 a.m.; U.S. Department of Labor, Secretary's Conference Room, 200 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC.

*Purpose:*                         The meeting will include a review and discussion of current issues which influence U.S. trade policy. Potential U.S. negotiating objectives and bargaining positions in current and anticipated trade negotiations will be discussed. Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 2155(f) it has been determined that the meeting will be concerned with matters the disclosure of which would seriously compromise the Government's negotiating objectives or bargaining                               ( print page 9616)                            positions. Accordingly, the meeting will be closed to the public.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Gregory Schoepfle, Director, Office of Trade and Labor Affairs;                         *Phone:*                         (202) 693-4887.                    

Signed at Washington, DC, the 25th day of February 2010.

Sandra Polaski,

Deputy Undersecretary, International Affairs.

[FR Doc. 2010-4352 Filed 3-2-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-28-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission

# SUMMARY:

The Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission (FCIC) announces that it will hold its first public hearing, in which the Commission will begin its thorough examination of the root causes of the crisis by hearing testimony on the causes and current state of the crisis. Top leaders of both private and public sector entities that played critical roles in the crisis will testify.

# DATES:

The open meeting will be held on Wednesday, January 13, 2010, and Thursday, January 14, 2010, commencing on both days at 9 a.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The open meeting will be held in the hearing room of the Committee on Ways and Means U.S. House of Representatives, 1100 Longworth House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

The Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, 1717 Pennsylvania Avenue, Suite 800, Washington, DC 20006, 202-292-2799, 202-632-1604 fax.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The purpose of the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission is to examine the causes, domestic and global, of the current financial and economic crisis in the United States, per the requirements of the Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act of 2009 (“FERN's), Section 5, Public Law 111-21,123 Stat. 1617 (2009).

*Public Participation:*                    The meeting is open to the public. The Chairman of the Commission will lead the meeting for the orderly conduct of business.                

Dated: January 7, 2009.

Phil Angelides,

Chairman, Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission.

[FR Doc. 2010-442 Filed 1-11-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-RK-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-02-2000
<CASH>                                           4,138
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,676
<ALLOWANCES>                                        23
<INVENTORY>                                      8,301
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,653
<PP&E>                                         440,073
<DEPRECIATION>                                 133,125
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 349,015
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,798
<BONDS>                                         45,968
<COMMON>                                         3,389
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            2,387
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     244,609
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   349,015
<SALES>                                        258,513
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               260,380
<CGS>                                          115,465
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  209,981
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,641
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 50,399
<INCOME-TAX>                                    19,554
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             30,845
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    30,845
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.11


</TABLE>
UN I TED ST ATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WAS H INGTON , D . C . 20460



### MEMORANDUM OFFICE Of WATER

SUBJECT: During the Inter-Agency review process fo r the final rule 

### "federal Require m e nts Under the Underground by'eclion C ontrol 

### (U IC) Program 

### for Carbon Dioxide (C02) Geologic Sequestration (GS) Wells " ( RlN 2040-AE98). EPA received th e fo ll owi ng ma teri a l s from the Department of Energy. The y are avail able i n the rulemaking docket. 

### FROM: Mary Rose Bayer, Geologi s t

## fY1**~** 

# I?o U IC Prevention Branch - OS R ul e Tcam 

### I I 

# Y:;]**><-~p-~--?** TO: EPA Geo logic Sequestration Rulemaking Docket Docket N o. EPA -H Q - OW-2008-0390 • Zama Ac id Gas E OR, CO 2 Seq ues t ra t ion , and Mon i to rin g Project , by Sm i th , S.A , J . A. Sorensen, E . N. S teadman , J. A. H arju, and D. Ryan. • In vestigation Or e 02 Plume Behavior 

### ror a Large-Scale P il ot Te s t of Geolog i c Carbo n Storage i n a Sa line Form a tion , by C hri s tin e Dought y. • Pla ins C02 Reduction (PCOR) Partnership (Ph ase 11) - la ma Fie ld Validation Tes t Regional Tech nology I mplementat io n P la n (Task 3 - Deliverable 0 52), by Sm i th , S. A., J . A. Sore nse n , E . N. Stea dman , J . A . H ar ju , 

### B. J ackson, D. Nimc huk , a nd 

### L. Burke. • Impact of Ac i d Gas Expos ur e on Ca p Rock Int egrit y Propertie s at Apache 

### la m a EOR & Sto r age rroject, 

### by Burke , L. 

### 1-1., S. A. Smi th , J. A. So re n se n , E . N. S teadman , 1. A. Harju , D. Ryan , D. N im c huk , and B . J ackson.

In ternet Address (URLJ •**hl1P twww** **&pa go~**  RecyctedlReeyct.bl e • Pl1nted with Vege table Oil Based Ink s on 100% Postconsumer , Process Chlol1ne Free Recycled Paper
§ 520.903d Febantel tablets. ( a ) *Specifications.* Each scored tablet contains 27.2 milligrams of febantel for use in dogs, puppies, cats, and kittens or 163.3 milligrams of febantel for use in dogs, puppies, and cats.
( b ) *Sponsor.* See No. 058198 in § 510.600(c) of this chapter.
( c ) *Conditions of use* — ( 1 ) *Amount* — ( i ) *Dogs and cats.* Ten milligrams per kilogram body weight. Administer once daily for 3 consecutive days.
( ii ) *Puppies and kittens fewer than 6 months of age.* Fifteen milligrams per kilogram body weight. Administer once daily for 3 consecutive days.
( 2 ) *Indications for use.* ( i ) For removal of hookworms (*Ancylostoma caninum* and *Uncinaria stenocephala*), ascarids (*Toxocara canis* and *Toxascaris leonina*) and whipworms (*Trichuris vulpis*) in dogs and puppies.
( ii ) For removal of hookworms (*Ancylostoma tubaeforme*) and ascarids (*Toxocara cati*) in cats and kittens.
( 3 ) *Limitations.* Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian.
[56 FR 50655, Oct. 8, 1991, as amended at 79 FR 28821, May 20, 2014. Redesignated at 85 FR 18119, Apr. 1, 2020, as amended at 86 FR 14818, Mar. 19, 2021]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-8016

LARRY WILLIAMS, Petitioner - Appellant,

versus CAROFLINA F. WILLIAMS; THOMAS COOPER, Jr., Judge; WILLIAM H. CHANDLER; HARRY L. DEVOE, JR.; NFN SHULER; GORDON B. JENKINSON; DAVID SPENCER; HENRY D. MCMASTER, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (CA-04-22296-3-24) Submitted: March 10, 2005 Decided: March 15, 2005 Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Larry Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Larry Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and denying, without prejudice, his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) as successive. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Williams has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We deny Williams’ motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
39176.

#### BUTLER v. THE STATE.

Decided November 14, 1961.

*Edwin A. Carlisle,*for plaintiff in error.

*Willard H. Chason, Solicitor,*contra.

Frankum, Judge.

The conviction of the accused was founded solely on circumstantial evidence which, given its strongest intendment against him, raised a strong suspicion of his guilt, but was not sufficient to exclude every other reasonable hypothesis save that of his guilt.

Therefore, the court erred in denying his motion for a new trial.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Jordan, J., concur.*
# C_2015221EN.01001401.xml

| 6.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/14

---

Judgment of the General Court of 21 May 2015 — Wine in Black v OHIM — Quinta do Noval-Vinhos (Wine in Black)

(Case T-420/14) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark Wine in Black - Earlier Community word mark NOVAL BLACK - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2015/C 221/19)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Wine in Black GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: A. Bauer and V. Ahmann, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: M.L. Vuijst and A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Quinta do Noval-Vinhos, SA (Pinhão, Portugal)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 6 March 2014 (Case R 1601/2013-1), concerning opposition proceedings between Quinta do Noval-Vinhos, SA and Wine in Black GmbH.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 6 March 2014 (Case R 1601/2013-1); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 6 March 2014 (Case R 1601/2013-1);

| 2. | Orders OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders OHIM to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 303, 8.9.2014.

1

---
# C_2015381EN.01005802.xml

| 16.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 381/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 381/58

---

Order of the General Court of 22 July 2015 — Swedish Match North Europe v OHIM — Skruf Snus (Oral snuff packages)

(Case T-196/14) (1)

1

(2015/C 381/71)

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  C 151, 19.5.2014.

1

---
§ 524.1195 Ivermectin otic suspension. ( a ) *Specifications.* Each tube contains 0.5 milliliter (mL) of a 0.01 percent suspension of ivermectin.
( b ) *Sponsor.* See No. 000010 in § 510.600(c) of this chapter.
( c ) *Conditions of use* — ( 1 ) *Amount.* Administer the contents of one 0.5-mL tube topically into each external ear canal.
( 2 ) *Indications for use.* For the treatment of adult ear mite (*Otodectes cynotis*) infestations in cats and kittens 4 weeks of age and older. Effectiveness against eggs and immature stages has not been proven.
( 3 ) *Limitations.* Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian.
[66 FR 7578, Jan. 24, 2001, as amended at 74 FR 26782, June 4, 2009]
---

EXHIBIT 13.A



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report of Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the transition period ended May 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joao Manuel , President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materials respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                              | 
|----------------------------- | 
|/s/ Joao Manuel               | 
|Joao Manuel                   | 
|(principal executive officer) | 



Dated:  January 28, 2010





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.





---