### 46597 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 149 / Wednesday, August 3, 2011 / Rules and Regulations

4 Organic Trade Association’s 2011 Organic Industry Survey, http://www.ota.com. food sales in 2009. Between 1990 and 2008, organic food sales historically demonstrated a growth rate between 15 to 24 percent each year. In 2010, organic food sales grew 7.7%. 4

In addition, USDA has 94 accredited certifying agents who provide certification services to producers and handlers. A complete list of names and addresses of accredited certifying agents may be found on the AMS NOP Web site, at http://www.ams.usda.gov/nop. AMS believes that most of these accredited certifying agents would be considered small entities under the criteria established by the SBA. D. Paperwork Reduction Act

No additional collection or recordkeeping requirements are imposed on the public by this final rule. Accordingly, OMB clearance is not required by § 350(h) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq., or OMB’s implementing regulations at 5 CFR part 1320. E. Comments Received on Proposed Rule AMS–TM–07–0136

AMS received nine comments on proposed rule AMS–TM–07–0136. Comments were received from an organic producer, trade associations, handlers, and private citizens. Most comments expressed positions in support of the 12 substances considered under this sunset review. One individual did not refer to subjects within the scope of this rulemaking.

Some commenters specifically supported substances that they promote, represent, or rely on. A comment submitted in support of Ferric phosphate emphasized the importance of the substance to reduce snail damage on organic crops. A comment received on Hydrogen chloride voiced that there are no good alternatives to the use of the substance for removal of residual lint from ginned cottonseed, a process necessary to facilitate mechanical planting. A comment received on Egg white lysozyme stated that the substance is essential for organic wine production. A comment submitted in support of L-Malic acid underscored that no alternatives exist for this substance and stated its importance as a processing aid for pH adjustment in organic products. Multiple comments received on Microorganisms emphasized the critical need for microorganisms in organic food processing for production of dairy, bread, fruit, vegetable, and meat products. Comments received in support of the allowance for Activated charcoal confirmed the necessity of this substance as a filtering aid in organic processing. Comments submitted supporting the allowance for the substances Cyclohexylamine, Diethylaminoethanol, and Octadecylamine, all boiler water additives, stated that these substances are important for packaging sterilization. Comments supporting the use of Peracetic acid/Peroxyacetic acid for sanitizing food contact surfaces indicated that there are no alternative materials with equivalent functionality. One comment submitted in support of Sodium acid pyrophosphate stated that without the allowance for this substance as a leavening agent, many organic baked goods would no longer be available because a satisfactory alternative does not exist. The same commenter also emphasized the necessity of Tetrasodium pyrophosphate in the manufacturing of meat analog products to facilitate proper flow in the extrusion process and ensure the development of suitable product texture. Overall, at least one comment was received in favor of renewal for all 12 substances considered under this sunset review.
Changes Requested But Not Made

One commenter opposed the continued use of six of the 12 substances: Cyclohexylamine, Diethylaminoethanol, Octadecylamine, Peracetic acid/Peroxyacetic acid, Sodium acid pyrophosphate, and Tetrasodium pyrophosphate. The commenter based their objection on the safety of the substances as described in the material safety data sheets (MSDS) for each substance and recommended removal of these substances from the National List. However, the NOSB reviewed these substances against the evaluation criteria in 7 U.S.C. 6517 and 6518 of the OFPA, and found that when these substances are used as limited by the annotations for each substance, they do not pose any danger to the environment or to manufacturing personnel or consumers. The NOSB concluded that these substances remain essential to organic production since no organic alternatives exist and recommended that the exemption for these substances on the National List continue. The NOP concurs with the NOSB’s evaluation and recommendation of these substances and, therefore, does not find that sufficient information was provided by the commenter to justify the removal of these substances from the National List. F. Effective Date

This final rule reflects recommendations submitted to the Secretary by the NOSB for the purpose of fulfilling the requirements of 7 U.S.C. 6517(e) of the OFPA. Section 7 U.S.C. 6517(e) requires the NOSB to review each substance on the National List within 5 years of its publication. The substances being reauthorized for use on the National List were initially authorized for use in organic agriculture on September 12, 2006. Because these substances are critical to organic production and handling operations, producers and handlers should be able to continue to use these substances for a full 5-year period beyond their expiration date of September 12, 2011.

Accordingly, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is found and determined that good cause exists for not postponing the effective date of this rule until 30 days after publication in the Federal Register . This rule shall be effective on September 12, 2011. List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 205

Administrative practice and procedure, Agriculture, Animals, Archives and records, Imports, Labeling, Organically produced products, Plants, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Seals and insignia, Soil conservation.

The authority citation for 7 CFR part 205 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 6501–6522. Dated: July 28, 2011. David R. Shipman, Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–19659 Filed 8–2–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 3410–02–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**14 CFR Part 39**

**[Docket No. FAA–2010–1307; Directorate Identifier 2010–NM–049–AD; Amendment**  **39–16671; AD 2011–09–09]**

**RIN 2120–AA64**

**Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model CL–600–2A12 (CL–601) and**  **CL–600–2B16 (CL–601–3A, CL–601– 3R, and CL–604 Variants) Airplanes** 

Correction

In rule document 2011–17402 appearing on page 41653–41657, in the issue of Friday, July 15, 2011, make the following correction:


### 46598 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 149 / Wednesday, August 3, 2011 / Rules and Regulations

1 The Commission voted 5–0 to publish this notice of requirements. Chairman Inez M. Tenenbaum, Commissioner Nancy A. Nord, and Commissioner Robert S. Adler each issued a statement, and the statements can be found at http://www.cpsc.gov/pr/statements.html. **39—AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES**

**§ 39.13 [Corrected]**

On page 41655, in the second table, Table 2—Initial Compliance Times for Airworthiness Limitations Tasks, a fourth column title was inadvertently printed above the words ‘‘Within 240 Flight hours after the effective date of this AD.’’ The table should appear as set forth below.



### TABLE 

### 2—I NITIAL 

### C OMPLIANCE 

### T IMES FOR 

### A IRWORTHINESS 

### L IMITATIONS 

### T ASKS

Bombardier, Inc. model— Task(s)— Initial compliance time (whichever occurs later)—

CL–600–2A12 (CL–601) airplanes,

serial numbers 3001 through 3066 inclusive; and CL–600– 2B16 (CL–601–3A and CL–601– 3R Variants) airplanes, serialnumbers 5001 through 5194 inclusive; on which Bombardier Service Bulletin 601–0590 has been accomplished. 30–11–00–101, Wing Anti-icing ... Prior to the accumulation of 4,800 total flight hours; or within4,800 flight hours after accomplishing Task 30–11–06–204 inSection 5–20–15 of the applicable Time Limits/Maintenance Checks manual specified in table 1 of this AD; whichever occurs later. Within 240 flight hours after the effective date of this AD.

CL–600–2A12 (CL–601) airplanes,

serial numbers 3001 through 3066 inclusive; and CL–600– 2B16 (CL–601–3A and CL–601– 3R Variants) airplanes, serialnumbers 5001 through 5194 inclusive; on which Bombardier Service Bulletin 601–0590 has been accomplished. 30–11–00–102, Wing Anti-icing ... Prior to the accumulation of 4,800 total flight hours; or within4,800 flight hours after accomplishing Task 30–13–00–205 inSection 5–20–15 of the applicable Time Limits/Maintenance Checks manual specified in table 1 of this AD; whichever occurs later. Within 240 flight hours after the effective date of this AD.

CL–600–2B16 (CL–604 Variants)

airplanes, serial numbers 5301 through 5665 inclusive. 30–11–00–101, Detailed Inspection of the Wing Anti-Ice Duct Piccolo-Tube, and 36–21–00– 101, Functional Test of theLeading Edge Thermal Switches. Prior to the accumulation of 6,400total flight hours; except for airplanes having 6,400 total flighthours or more as of the effective date of this AD on whichthe task has not been accomplished: prior to the next scheduled 6,400 flight hour task inspection or prior to the next scheduled accomplishment ofTask 57–10–00–208 in the applicable Time Limits/Maintenance Checks manual specified in table 1 of this AD, whichever occurs first. Within 320 flight hours after the effective date of this AD.

CL–600–2B16 (CL–604 Variants)

airplanes, serial numbers 5701 and subsequent. 30–11–00–101, Detailed Inspection of the Wing Anti-Ice Duct Piccolo-Tube, and 36–21–00– 101, Functional Test of theLeading Edge Thermal Switches. Prior to the accumulation of 6,400 total flight hours. Within 320 flight hours after the effective date of this AD.

[FR Doc. C1–2011–17402 Filed 7–28–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 1505–01–D**

**CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION** 

**16 CFR Chapter II**

**[CPSC Docket No. CPSC–2011–0050]**

**Third Party Testing for Certain Children’s Products; Toys:**  **Requirements for Accreditation of Third Party Conformity Assessment**  **Bodies**

**AGENCY :**  Consumer Product Safety Commission.

**ACTION :**  Notice of requirements. **SUMMARY :**  The Consumer Product Safety Commission (‘‘CPSC,’’ ‘‘Commission,’’ or ‘‘we’’) is issuing a notice of requirements that provides the criteria and process for Commission acceptance of accreditation of third party conformity assessment bodies for testing, pursuant to ASTM International’s (formerly the American Society for Testing and Materials) (‘‘ASTM’’) Standard Consumer Safety Specification for Toy Safety, F 963–08 (‘‘ASTM F 963–08’’), and section 4.27 (toy chests) from ASTM International’s F 963–07 e 1 version of the standard (‘‘ASTM F 963–07 e 1’’), which are the consumer product safety standards for toys, pursuant to section 106 of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 (CPSIA), Public Law 110– 314. The Commission is issuing this notice of requirements pursuant to section 14(a)(3)(B)(vi) of the Consumer Product Safety Act (CPSA).

**DATES :**  Effective Date: The requirements for accreditation of third party conformity assessment bodies to assess conformity with ASTM F 963–08 and/ or section 4.27 of ASTM F 963–07 e 1 are effective August 3, 2011. 1

Comments in response to this notice of requirements should be submitted by September 2, 2011. Comments on this notice should be captioned ‘‘Third party Testing for Certain Children’s Products; Toys: Requirements for Accreditation of