alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7602 

To amend the Defense Production Act of 1950 to prohibit the President 

from making provision for the purchase of solar panels under the authority of such Act, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 8, 2024 

Mr. PERRY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Defense Production Act of 1950 to prohibit 

the President from making provision for the purchase 

of solar panels under the authority of such Act, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Planes Not Panels 

5 Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7602 IH

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON PRESIDENTIAL ACTION. 

2 Section 303(a) of the Defense Production Act of 

3 1950 (50 U.S.C. 4533(a)) is amended by adding at the 

4 end the following: 

5 ‘‘(8) SOLAR PANELS.— 

6 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The President may 

7 not use any authority under this section to 

8 make provision for purchases of or commit9 ments to purchase solar panels. 

10 ‘‘(B) SOLAR PANEL DEFINED.—In this 

11 paragraph, the term ‘solar panel’ means a crys12 talline silicon photovoltaic cell or module.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
LEVITY

AERIAL

Levity Aerial | www.levityaerial.com | Boulder, CO

Safety Checklist for UAV Operation

Pre-flight

•	Reviewed area for any FAA restricted fly zones or other areas of concern

•	Reviewed safety requirements with sponsor / owner 

•	Posted “Launch/Landing” zone sign calling for 50’ perimeter

•	Walked the hover area or path of flight to check for any areas on concern

Flight Set-up

•	Advise anyone within “Launch/Landing” area of safety and 50’ requirement

•	Unpack and check UAV for any visible signs of damage 

•	Turn on Remote Controller and observe that both power and Wi-Fi are green 

•	Ensure launch zone is clear

•	Turn on UAV 

•	Wait for solid GPS lights (Solid Green slow flashing)

•	Review Launch Site one last time before lift off 

•	Engage motors and start straight horizontal lift to desired altitude

Flight

•	Monitor both GPS Lock (sufficient number of satellites) / battery level every minute

•	Watch for any changes to the “Launch/Landing” area of safety and advise as necessary 

•	Watch for any irregular craft behavior and land immediately if necessary 

•	Return the craft to the landing area within 20% of battery life

Post-Flight

•	Announce that the craft is returning for landing 

•	Visual check that the 50’ rule is observed / hover until 50’ is observed

•	Slowly bring the UAV in for a landing 

•	Turn off Battery on UAV

•	Turn off Remote Controller

•	Pack UAV in case for storage
The Supreme Court of Texas

Post Office Box 12248

Austin, Texas 78711

Telephone: (512) 463-1312

FASCIMILE

**TO:OF:FAX NO.:PHONE NO.:**

Ms. Cathy WilbornClerk, Thirteenth Court of Appeals361-888-0794

Honorable Carl E. LewisNueces County Court at Law No. 5361-561-6142

Mr. James A. PiklJames A. Pikl, P. C.214-544-7001

Ms.  Linda  J.  Rhodes-SchauerSchauer and Simank361-884-2822

Ms. Susan MillerTX Dept. of Protective & Reg Srvs512-339-5876

Mr. Ernest M. BrionesNueces County Clerk361-8880329

Mr. Richard Edric SalisburyP.O. Box 12548512-320-0667

**FROM:**Clerk’s Office

**DATE:**October 24, 2005

**PAGES:**(3), including cover page

**RE:**Case Number: 05-0838;  ***IN RE  EDWARD WERNECKE AND MICHELE WERNECKE***

**COMMENTS:**

If you have any questions, please call.  Thank you.

The Supreme Court of Texas

Post Office Box 12248

Austin, Texas 78711

Telephone: (512) 463-1312

FASCIMILE

**TO:OF:FAX NO.:PHONE NO.:**

713/123-4567713/999-9999

**FROM:**Clerk’s Office

**DATE:**October 24, 2005

**PAGES:**(1), including cover page

**RE:**Case Number: ;  *v.*

**COMMENTS:**

If you have any questions, please call.  Thank you.

*IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL PAGES, PLEASE TELEPHONE THE CLERK’S OFFICE IMMEDIATELY.
ex4-2.htm


Exhibit 4.2

 

 



 


 

 




 


 

 

The Corporation will furnish without charge to each stockholder who so requests the powers, designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional, or other special rights of each class of stock or series thereof and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions of such preferences and/or rights. The number of shares represented by this certificate may be less than the number set forth on the face as a result of conversion of shares. The Corporation will confirm the number of shares represented by this certificate upon written request made by the record holder. 

 

THIS SECURITY HAS NOT BEEN REGISTERED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR THE SECURITIES COMMISSION OF ANY STATE IN RELIANCE UPON AN EXEMPTION FROM REGISTRATION UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE “SECURITIES ACT”), AND, ACCORDINGLY, MAY NOT BE OFFERED OR SOLD EXCEPT PURSUANT TO AN EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OR PURSUANT TO AN AVAILABLE EXEMPTION FROM, OR IN A TRANSACTION NOT SUBJECT TO, THE REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES ACT AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE STATE SECURITIES LAWS AS EVIDENCED BY A LEGAL OPINION OF COUNSEL TO THE TRANSFEROR TO SUCH EFFECT, THE FORM AND SUBSTANCE OF WHICH SHALL BE REASONABLY ACCEPTABLE TO THE COMPANY. THIS SECURITY MAY BE PLEDGED IN CONNECTION WITH A BONA FIDE MARGIN ACCOUNT WITH A REGISTERED BROKER-DEALER OR OTHER LOAN WITH A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION THAT IS AN “ACCREDITED INVESTOR” AS DEFINED IN RULE 501(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OR OTHER LOAN SECURED BY SUCH SECURITIES.

 

TEN COM     -     as tenants in common     UNIF GIFT MIN ACT - ____ Custodian ____ (Minor)

TEN ENT     -     as tenants by the entireties      under Uniform Gifts to Minors Act _________ (State)

JT TEN     -     as joint tenants with right of survivorship     UNIF TRF MIN ACT - ____ Custodian _____ (Minor)

and not as tenants in common      under ______ (State) Uniform Transfer to Minors Act

 

PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE

 

 

 

 

For value received, the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto 

 

___________________________________________________________________________________

PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS OF ASSIGNEE 

___________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________ Shares

represented by the within Certificate, and hereby irrevocably constitutes and appoints ____________

____________________________________________________________ Attorney to transfer the said

shares on the books of the within-named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.

 

Date, __________________________

 

                    In presence of           ________________________________________
#### Ida Levett [Rose L. Greenberg, Executrix, Substituted Plaintiff] *v.*Meyer Etkind

*Lawrence W. Iannotti,*for the appellee (defendant).

*Alexander*Winnick, for the appellant (plaintiff).

Argued April 1

decided April 1, 1969

The motion by the defendant to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in New Haven County is denied.
# C_2014421EN.01005901.xml

| 24.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 421/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 421/59

---

Action brought on 17 June 2014 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-55/14)

2014/C 421/85

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: L. Levi and A. Tymen, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision not to renew the applicant’s contract, which should have been for an indefinite period.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

| — | annul the decision of 31 October 2013 not to renew the applicant’s contract as a member of the contract staff, which contract should have been for an indefinite period; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of 31 October 2013 not to renew the applicant’s contract as a member of the contract staff, which contract should have been for an indefinite period;

| — | annul the decision of the AECE of 6 March 2014 rejecting the applicant’s complaint of 15 November 2013, in that it took account of additional factors not contained in the contested decision of 31 October 2013; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the AECE of 6 March 2014 rejecting the applicant’s complaint of 15 November 2013, in that it took account of additional factors not contained in the contested decision of 31 October 2013;

| — | award the applicant damages to the sum of EUR 20  000; |
| --- | --- |

—

award the applicant damages to the sum of EUR 20  000;

| — | order the Commission to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay all the costs.

---
[No. 38830-4-I.

Division One.

December 29, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Verald Saselli, *Appellant. In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of*Verald Saselli, *Petitioner.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for What-com County, No. 88-1-00479-2, David A. Nichols, J., entered April 12, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Webster, J., concurred in by Baker, C.J., and Agid, J.
# C_2014292EN.01006202.xml

| 1.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 292/62 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 292/62

---

Action brought on 3 June 2014 — ZZ v EEAS

(Case F-51/14)

2014/C 292/81

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: D. de Abreu Caldas, M. de Abreu Caldas and J.-N. Louis, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: EEAS

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision not to promote the applicant to grade AST 3 in the 2013 promotion exercise and seeking damages for the non-material loss allegedly suffered.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of 9 October 2013 fixing the list of officials promoted in the 2013 promotion exercise; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of 9 October 2013 fixing the list of officials promoted in the 2013 promotion exercise;

| — | Order the EEAS to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the EEAS to pay the costs.

---
§ 520.784 Doxylamine. ( a ) *Specifications.* The drug is in tablet form and contains doxylamine succinate as the active drug ingredient.
( b ) *Sponsor.* See No. 000061 in § 510.600(c) of this chapter.
( c ) *Conditions of use* — ( 1 ) *Amount.* Horses: Administer orally 1 to 2 milligrams (mg) per pound (/lb) of body weight per day divided into 3 or 4 equal doses. Dogs and cats: Administer orally 2 to 3 mg/lb of body weight per day divided into 3 or 4 equal doses.
( 2 ) *Indications for use.* For use when antihistaminic therapy may be expected to alleviate some signs of disease in horses, dogs, and cats.
( 3 ) *Limitations.* Do not use in horses intended for human consumption. Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian.
[40 FR 13838, Mar. 27, 1975, as amended at 42 FR 60140, Nov. 25, 1977; 46 FR 48642, Oct. 2, 1981; 61 FR 8873, Mar. 6, 1996; 62 FR 61624, Nov. 19, 1997; 79 FR 28821, May 20, 2014]
§ 582.4666 Propylene glycol. ( a ) *Product.* Propylene glycol.
( b ) *Conditions of use.* This substance is generally recognized as safe when used in accordance with good manufacturing or feeding practice.
§ 520.2610 Trimethoprim and sulfadiazine tablets. ( a ) *Specifications.* Each tablet contains 30 milligrams (mg) (5 mg trimethoprim and 25 mg sulfadiazine), 120 mg (20 mg trimethoprim and 100 mg sulfadiazine), 480 mg (80 mg trimethoprim and 400 mg sulfadiazine) or 960 mg (160 mg trimethoprim and 800 mg sulfadiazine).
( b ) *Sponsors.* See Nos. 000061 and 054771 in § 510.600(c) of this chapter.
( c ) *Conditions of use in dogs* — ( 1 ) *Amount.* Administer orally at 30 mg per kilogram of body weight (14 milligrams per pound) once daily. Alternatively, especially in severe infections, the initial dose may be followed by one-half the recommended daily dose every 12 hours. Administer for 2 to 3 days after symptoms have subsided. Do not treat for more than 14 consecutive days.
( 2 ) *Indications for use.* The drug is used in dogs where systemic antibacterial action against sensitive organisms is required, either alone or as an adjunct to surgery or debridement with associated infection. The drug is indicated where control of bacterial infection is required during the treatment of acute urinary tract infections, acute bacterial complications of distemper, acute respiratory tract infections, acute alimentary tract infections, wound infections, and abscesses.
( 3 ) *Limitations.* Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian.
[79 FR 28833, May 20, 2014]
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 41 (Wednesday, March 3, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9602-9603]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4418]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License Reissuances

    Notice is hereby given that the following Ocean Transportation 
Intermediary licenses have been reissued by the Federal Maritime 
Commission pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 
U.S.C. Chapter 409) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to 
the licensing of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR part 515.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
     License No.         Name/address             Date reissued
------------------------------------------------------------------------
017678N..............  Four Link         January 2, 2010.
                        International,
                        Inc., 146-27
                        167th Street,
                        <greek-i>100,
                        Jamaica, NY
                        11434.
018613N..............  Caribbean Cargo   December 18, 2009.
                        & Package
                        Services, Inc.,
                        147-46 176th
                        Street,
                        Jamaica, NY
                        11434.
021418F..............  Asbun             January 4, 2010.
                        International
                        Freight, Inc.,
                        8140 NW. 74th
                        Avenue, Suite
                        13 & 14,
                        Medley, FL
                        33166.

[[Page 9603]]

 
021476F..............  Norma's Cargo     January 21, 2010.
                        Solutions LLC,
                        5665 SW. 8th
                        Street, Miami,
                        FL 33134.
------------------------------------------------------------------------


Sandra L. Kusumoto,
Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.
[FR Doc. 2010-4418 Filed 3-2-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
#### Wohadlo *v.*Farry et al.

[No. 17,356.

Filed May 28, 1945.]

*Fred Barnett,*of Hammond, for appellant.

*Alex A. Bocknowski, James J. Niemiec*and *Joseph J. Wasko,*all of East Chicago, for appellees.

Royse, C. J.

— Appellant brought this action to set aside the judgment and sale in a partition action in which she had been a co-plaintiff. The case of *Wohadlo et al.*v. *Farry et al.*(1943), 221 Ind. 219, 46 N. E. (2d) 489, involved the same parties and the same subject-matter. In that ease the Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the Lake Superior Court in striking out appellants’ complaint. In referring to the complaint there under consideration the court said: “The facts *696alleged show no fraud and nothing unconscionable in the proceedings or in the judgment itself.” Appellant, erroneously interpreting that statement as a suggestion as to how she might continue the litigation, filed a complaint in which she unsuccessfully attempted to charge the appellees herein with fraud in the partition suit. To this complaint appellee Szczygiel filed a demurrer, the other appellees filing a motion to strike out. The demurrer and motion to strike out were sustained. Thereupon the appellant filed what she termed a new amended com* plaint which was not materially different from the original complaint herein. It contained no charges of fraud against the parties hereto. Appellees moved the court to strike out the new amended complaint on the grounds it was a sham and frivolous pleading. The trial court sustained this motion and the record discloses appellant refused to plead further. It must be concluded therefore she had stated all the facts she had to sustáin an action against appellees.

There must be an end to litigation. The Lake Superior Court properly sustained the motion to strike out the new amended complaint and its judgment is therefore affirmed.

Note. — Reported in 61 N. E. (2d) 188.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Central Wireless, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


Date:
                  January 19, 2007
              By:
              /s/ *Kenneth
                W. Brand*Kenneth
                  W. Brand
                Acting
                    Principal Financial Officer


A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Central Wireless, Inc. and will be retained
      by Central Wireless, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM GLAMIS
GOLD LTD. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          26,913
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      723
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      8,966
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                39,892
<PP&E>                                          69,401
<DEPRECIATION>                                  35,344
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 100,724
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,091
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        89,830
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,935
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   100,724
<SALES>                                         25,388
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,388
<CGS>                                           15,716
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,716
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,307
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  61
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    649
<INCOME-TAX>                                       241
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                407
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       407
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Central  Wireless,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  each of
the  undersigned,  in the capacities and on the dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

      1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company.

Date: May 14, 2004           By: /s/ Kenneth W.  Brand
                                 ----------------------------------------------
                                 Name:  Kenneth W.  Brand
                                 Title: Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief
                                 Executive Officer

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other  document  authentications,   acknowledging,  or  otherwise  adopting  the
signature  that  appears in typed form  within  the  electronic  version of this
written  statement  required  by  Section  906,  has been  provided  to  Central
Wireless,  Inc. and will be retained by Central Wireless,  Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                      B-1
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.1

          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Kenneth W. Brand, the Chief Executive Officer of Central Wireless Inc. (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)      the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal
         quarter ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Dated: November 14, 2002

                                               /s/ Kenneth W. Brand
                                               --------------------------------
                                               Name: Kenneth W. Brand
                                               Title: Chief Executive Officer