alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 5.1

                        [LETTERHEAD OF VENTURE LAW GROUP]


                                November 10, 1998

Corixa Corporation
1124 Columbia Street, Suite 200
Seattle, WA  98104

        REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM S-8

Ladies and Gentlemen:

        We have examined the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (the
"Registration Statement") to be filed by Corixa Corporation ("Corixa") with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") on or about November 10,
1998 in connection with the registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, of a total of 12,325 shares of Corixa's Common Stock (the "Shares")
reserved for issuance by Corixa pursuant to the GenQuest, Inc. 1996 Stock Option
Plan. As Corixa's legal counsel in connection with this transaction, we have
examined the proceedings taken and are familiar with the proceedings proposed to
be taken by Corixa in connection with the sale and issuance of the Shares.

        It is our opinion that upon conclusion of the proceedings being taken or
contemplated by us, as Corixa's legal counsel, to be taken prior to the issuance
of the Shares, and upon completion of the proceedings being taken in order to
permit such transactions to be carried out in accordance with the securities
laws of the various states where required, the Shares when issued and sold in
the manner described in the Registration Statement will be legally and validly
issued, fully paid and non-assessable.

        We consent to the use of this opinion as an exhibit to the Registration
Statement and further consent to the use of our name wherever appearing in the
Registration Statement, including the Prospectus constituting a part thereof,
and in any amendment thereto.

        This opinion is solely for your benefit and may not be relied upon by
any other person without our prior written consent.

                                                   Very truly yours,

                                                   VENTURE LAW GROUP
                                                   A Professional Corporation


                                                   /s/Venture Law Group
                                                   --------------------
Exhibit 4.5

Schedule 1 to Exhibit 4.4  Individual Deviations from Standard MTIP Invitation Letter to  Members of the Management Board(1)

Name

Maximum Incentive Amount (€)
for MTIP Tranche 2004Kai-Uwe Ricke

750,000Dr. Karl-Gerhard Eick

562,500Dr. Heinz Klinkhammer

450,000René Obermann

450,000Konrad F. Reiss

450,000Walter Raizner

406,250
  pro rata, starting
  Nov. 1, 2004
(participating)


---

Maximum incentive amounts can only be reached if both 2004 plan targets are met. Amounts are payable in early 2007, according to the MTIP terms and
conditions. Actual amounts accrued for 2004 to be found in Item 6. See Exhibits 4.3 and 4.4 for further details.

---



QuickLinks
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 9 A1 57 3 . VI C TOR CALLAHAN v . THE STATE.

Vi ct or Cal l ah an was co n v i ct ed of k i d nap p in g

, arm ed ro b b ery

, an d h i jack i n g a

m o to r v eh i cl e, an d th i s Co u rt affi rm ed h is co n vi ct io n s o n ap p eal

. Ca l l a h a n v. S t a t e

,

2 5 0 G a. Ap p. 1 9 3 (5 5 0 S E 2 d 7 5 7 ) (2 0 0 1). Cal l ah an su b seq u en t l y fi led a p ro s e

m o ti o n al l eg i n g t h at hi s ju d g m en t o f co n v i ct i o n i s v oi d b ecau s e h e w as i nd i ct ed

, an d

t h en rei n d i ct ed

, i n t wo d i fferen t t erm s o f co urt b y t h e s am e g ran d ju ro rs

. Th e t ri al

co u rt d en i ed t h e m o t i o n

, an d Cal l ah an fi l ed t h i s ap p eal

.

As t h e Su p rem e Co u rt h as m ad e cl ear, a p os t -co n v i ct i o n m o t i o n s eek i n g to

v acat e an al l eg ed l y v oi d cri m i n al co nv i ct i o n i s n ot o n e o f t he es t ab l i s h ed p ro ced u res

fo r ch al l en gi n g th e v al id i t y o f a ju d g m en t i n a cri m i nal cas e, an d an ap p eal fro m t h e

t ri al co urt ’ s ru li n g o n s u ch a pet i t i o n s h o u l d b e d is m i s s ed

. See Ro b er t s v. S t a t e

, 2 8 6

Ga. 5 3 2 (6 9 0 SE2 d 1 5 0 ) (2 0 1 0). Here, Cal l ah an ’ s m o t io n as s ert ed t h at d u e t o al l eg ed

i s su es wi t h h i s in d i ct m en t an d g ran d ju ry p ro ceed i n g s, h i s c o n v i c t i o n s s h o u l d b e

v a c at ed

. Th i s i s n o t a v al i d pro ced u re fo r ch al l en g i n g t h e ju d g m en t i n h i s cri m i n al

cas e. Acco rd in g l y

, Cal l ah an ’ s ap p eal fro m t h e d en ial o f h i s m o ti o n is h ereb y

DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t if y t h a t th e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

.

W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. April 09, 2019

04/09/2019
# C_2014421EN.01006002.xml

| 24.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 421/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 421/60

---

Action brought on 30 June 2014 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-60/14)

2014/C 421/87

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: S. Orlandi, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the proposed crediting of pensionable years relating to the transfer of the applicant’s pension rights to the Union pension scheme applying the new GIP relating to Articles 11 and 12 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

| — | declare illegal and inapplicable Article 9 of the general implementing provisions for Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare illegal and inapplicable Article 9 of the general implementing provisions for Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations;

| — | annul the decision of 4 November 2013 to quantify pension rights acquired prior to his entering the service, as part of the transfer of those rights to the pension scheme of the institutions of the European Union, pursuant to the general implementing provisions for Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of 3 March 2011; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of 4 November 2013 to quantify pension rights acquired prior to his entering the service, as part of the transfer of those rights to the pension scheme of the institutions of the European Union, pursuant to the general implementing provisions for Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of 3 March 2011;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
§ 74.1711 D&C Yellow No. 11. ( a ) *Identity.* ( 1 ) The color additive D&C Yellow No. 11 is principally 2-(2-quinolyl)-1,3-indandione.
( 2 ) Color additive mixtures, for drug use made with D&C Yellow No. 11 may contain only those diluents that are suitable and that are listed in part 73 of this chapter as safe for use in color additive mixtures for coloring externally applied drugs.
( b ) *Specifications.* D&C Yellow No. 11 shall conform to the following specifications and shall be free from impurities, other than those named, to the extent that such other impurities may be avoided by good manufacturing practice: Volatile matter (at 135 °C), not more than 1 percent. Ethyl alcohol-insoluble matter, not more than 0.4 percent. Phthalic acid, not more than 0.3 percent. Quinaldine, not more than 0.2 percent. Subsidiary colors, not more than 5 percent. Lead (as Pb), not more than 20 parts per million. Arsenic (as As), not more than 3 parts per million. Mercury (as Hg), not more than 1 part per million. Total color, not less than 96 percent.
( c ) *Uses and restrictions.* D&C Yellow No. 11 may be safely used in externally applied drugs in amounts consistent with good manufacturing practice.
( d ) *Labeling.* The label of the color additive and any mixtures prepared therefrom intended solely or in part for coloring purposes shall conform to the requirements of § 70.25 of this chapter.
( e ) *Certification.* All batches of D&C Yellow No. 11 shall be certified in accordance with regulations in part 80 of this chapter.
#### § 20.119 Lists of names and addresses.

Names and addresses of individuals in Food and Drug Administration records shall not be sold or rented. Names and addresses shall not be disclosed if disclosure is prohibited as a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, e.g., lists of names and home addresses of Food and Drug Administration employees, which shall not be disclosed under § 20.110.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7513 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7513

To prohibit the Secretary of Health and Human Services from finalizing 
a proposed rule regarding minimum staffing for nursing facilities, and 
    to establish an advisory panel on the skilled nursing facility 
                               workforce.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 1, 2024

  Mrs. Fischbach (for herself and Mr. Pence) introduced the following 
  bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in 
 addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the Secretary of Health and Human Services from finalizing 
a proposed rule regarding minimum staffing for nursing facilities, and 
    to establish an advisory panel on the skilled nursing facility 
                               workforce.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting America's Seniors' Access 
to Care Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON FINALIZING PROPOSED STAFFING RULE.

    The Secretary of Health and Human Services may not implement, 
enforce, or otherwise give effect to the proposed rule entitled 
``Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Minimum Staffing Standards for Long-
Term Care Facilities and Medicaid Institutional Payment Transparency 
Reporting'' published by the Department of Health and Human Services on 
September 6, 2023 (88 Fed. Reg. 61352-61429), and may not promulgate 
any substantially similar rule.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Gordon L. Ellis, President and Chief Executive
Officer, certify that:

1. To my knowledge, this report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. To my knowledge, the information in this report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations as of July
31, 2004.

Date: September 9, 2004

                                                             /s/ Gordon L. Ellis
                                                             -------------------
                          Gordon L. Ellis, President and Chief Executive Officer
§ 522.311 Cefovecin. ( a ) *Specifications.* Each milliliter of constituted solution contains 80 milligrams (mg) cefovecin as the sodium salt.
( b ) *Sponsor.* See No. 054771 in § 510.600(c) of this chapter.
( c ) *Special considerations.* Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian.
( d ) *Conditions of use* — ( 1 ) *Dogs* — ( i ) *Amount.* Administer 3.6 mg/pound (lb) (8 mg/kilograms (kg)) body weight as a single subcutaneous injection. A second subcutaneous injection of 3.6 mg/lb (8 mg/kg) may be administered if response to therapy is not complete.
( ii ) *Indications for use.* For the treatment of skin infections (secondary superficial pyoderma, abscesses, and wounds) in dogs caused by susceptible strains of *Staphylococcus intermedius* and *Streptococcus canis* (Group G).
( 2 ) *Cats* — ( i ) *Amount.* Administer 3.6 mg/lb (8 mg/kg) body weight as a single, one-time subcutaneous injection.
( ii ) *Indications for use.* For the treatment of skin infections (wounds and abscesses) in cats caused by susceptible strains of *Pasteurella multocida.*
[73 FR 29685, May 22, 2008, as amended at 79 FR 16185, Mar. 25, 2014]
June 4, 2013 Post Office Box 1569 Carlsbad, NM 88221-1569 (575) 887-1191 1-800-658-2713 www.cityofcarlsbadnm.com

Dennis J. DeVany Chief, Essential Air Service Division, X-53 Office ofAviation Analysis Eas@dot.gov

DearMr. DeVany, DALEJANWAY MAYOR
JON R. TULLY CITYADMINISTRATOR

I wanted to take this opportunity first and foremost, to express our appreciation for the Essential Air Service entitlement, which has ensured Carlsbad's link to the national air transportation network for many years; and, for your support and assistance during the bidprocess. I accept the decision advanced by EAS administrators in their recent Carlsbad EAS selection Orders. I will work with the cunentEAS provider for the benefit ofthe citizens ofCarlsbad and the surrounding area.**Regards,~**

# ~~ Dale Janway

Wardl PAUL C, AGUILAR Ward2 J.R. DOPORTO SANDRA K. NUNLEY COUNCILORS Ward3 JUDI WATERS JASON G. ,.;U.J..IJEUJL Ward4 DICK DOSS JANELLE. WHITLOCK
§ 507.62 Issuance of an order to withdraw a qualified facility exemption. ( a ) An FDA Division Director in whose division the qualified facility is located (or, in the case of a foreign facility, the Director of the Division of Compliance in the Center for Veterinary Medicine), or an FDA official senior to either such Director, must approve an order to withdraw the exemption before the order is issued.
( b ) Any officer or qualified employee of FDA may issue an order to withdraw the exemption after it has been approved in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) FDA must issue an order to withdraw the exemption to the owner, operator, or agent in charge of the facility.
( d ) FDA must issue an order to withdraw the exemption in writing, signed and dated by the officer or qualified employee of FDA who is issuing the order.
[80 FR 56337, Sept. 17, 2015, as amended at 85 FR 16554, Mar. 24, 2020]
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7610 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7610

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to clarify that utility line 
          technicians qualify as emergency response providers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 2024

Mr. Higgins of Louisiana (for himself and Mr. Norcross) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 
                           and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to clarify that utility line 
          technicians qualify as emergency response providers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Linemen Legacy Act''.

SEC. 2. EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROVIDERS.

    Section 2(6) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 101(6)) 
is amended--
            (1) by striking ``includes Federal'' and inserting 
        ``includes--
                    ``(A) Federal'';
            (2) by striking the period at the end and inserting ``; 
        and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(B) utility line technicians responding to a 
                major disaster or an emergency declared by the 
                President under section 501 of the Robert T. Stafford 
                Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 
                5191).''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9398-9399]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4296]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Meeting of the Defense Policy Board

AGENCY: Defense Policy Board, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Policy Board will meet in closed session on March 
18, 2010 from 0730 hrs until 1800 hrs and on March 19, 2010 from 0730 
hrs until

[[Page 9399]]

1030 hrs at the Pentagon. The purpose of the meeting is to provide the 
Secretary of Defense, Deputy Secretary of Defense and Under Secretary 
of Defense for Policy with independent, informed advice on major 
matters of defense policy. The Board will hold classified discussions 
on national security matters. In accordance with Section 10(d) of the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended [5 U.S.C. 
App II (1982)], it has been determined that this meeting concerns 
matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552B (c)(1)(1982), and that accordingly this 
meeting will be closed to the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Ann Hansen, 703-571-9232.

    Dated: February 23, 2010.
Mitchell S. Bryman,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2010-4296 Filed 3-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
§ 610.61 Package label. The following items shall appear on the label affixed to each package containing a product: ( a ) The proper name of the product;
( b ) The name, address, and license number of manufacturer;
( c ) The lot number or other lot identification;
( d ) The expiration date;
( e ) The preservative used and its concentration, or if no preservative is used and the absence of a preservative is a safety factor, the words “no preservative”;
( f ) The number of containers, if more than one;
( g ) The amount of product in the container expressed as ( 1 ) the number of doses,
( 2 ) volume,
( 3 ) units of potency,
( 4 ) weight,
( 5 ) equivalent volume (for dried product to be reconstituted), or
( 6 ) such combination of the foregoing as needed for an accurate description of the contents, whichever is applicable;
( h ) The recommended storage temperature;
( i ) The words “Shake Well”, “Do not Freeze” or the equivalent, as well as other instructions, when indicated by the character of the product;
( j ) The recommended individual dose if the enclosed container(s) is a multiple-dose container;
( k ) The route of administration recommended, or reference to such directions in an enclosed circular;
( l ) Known sensitizing substances, or reference to an enclosed circular containing appropriate information;
( m ) The type and calculated amount of antibiotics added during manufacture;
( n ) The inactive ingredients when a safety factor, or reference to an enclosed circular containing appropriate information;
( o ) The adjuvant, if present;
( p ) The source of the product when a factor in safe administration;
( q ) The identity of each microorganism used in manufacture, and, where applicable, the production medium and the method of inactivation, or reference to an enclosed circular containing appropriate information;
( r ) Minimum potency of product expressed in terms of official standard of potency or, if potency is a factor and no U.S. standard of potency has been prescribed, the words “No U.S. standard of potency.”
( s ) The statement: “ ‘Rx only’ ” for prescription biologicals.
[38 FR 32056, Nov. 20, 1973, as amended at 47 FR 22518, May 25, 1982; 55 FR 10423, Mar. 21, 1990; 67 FR 4907, Feb. 1, 2002]
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-60072 Summary Calendar

HOANG LY, Petitioner,

versus IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

- - - - - - - - - - Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A 23-140-430

- - - - - - - - - - June 10, 1997 Before SMITH, DUHE’ and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Hoang Thanh Ly seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in his petition for review of the order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the order of the Immigration Judge (IJ) ordering Ly deported. Ly’s IFP motion is denied. This court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction on its own motion if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby , 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). We lack jurisdiction to review a BIA decisionNo. 97-60072 - 2 - ordering deportation for conviction of an aggravated felony. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(C); see 8 U.S.C. § 1251(a)(2)(A)(iii). Ly’s burglary conviction is an aggravated felony under the immigration laws. 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(G). Because we lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s order, Ly’s petition is dismissed. IFP DENIED; PETITION DISMISSED.