alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 38 (Friday, February 26, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 8974]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4081]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human 
Development; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel; Maternal and Child Health in 
Poor Countries: Evidence from Randomized Evaluations.
    Date: March 18, 2010.
    Time: 11 a.m. to 2:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 
Room 5B01, Rockville, MD 20852.(Telephone Conference Call)
    Contact Person: Carla T. Walls, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Division of Scientific Review, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National 
Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive 
Blvd., Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-6898, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0770666b6b7464476a666e6b29696e6f29606871"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e5928489899686a588848c89cb8b8c8dcb828a93">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the closing of the Federal Government the week of 
February 7, 2010. The Federal Government was closed due to inclement 
weather conditions.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 19, 2010.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-4081 Filed 2-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Exhibit 11.3

                             WEBLINK WIRELESS, INC.
                    COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (LOSS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000
                                                           -----------------------------------------
                                                             NUMBER         PERCENT       EQUIVALENT
                                                           OF SHARES      OUTSTANDING       SHARES
                                                           ---------      -----------       ------
<S>                                                        <C>            <C>          <C>
COMMON STOCK
   From Founders' Stock                                     2,300,000       100.00%        2,300,000
   Stock Options Exercised                                  2,508,997        92.74%        2,326,910
   Preferred Stock Converted to Common Stock               15,310,943       100.00%       15,310,943
   1994 Common Stock Offerings                             11,242,857       100.00%       11,242,857
   1995 Common Stock Offerings                              4,323,874       100.00%        4,323,874
   1996 Common Stock Offering                               6,000,000       100.00%        6,000,000
   1999 Treasury Stock Transaction                             (6,588)      100.00%           (6,588)
   March 2000 Debt Swap                                     3,789,715        81.15%        3,075,261
   Canadian Transaction                                       714,286        91.53%          653,786
   Employee Stock Purchase Plan Shares Issued                 190,651        81.20%          154,817
   Warrants Exercised                                         134,737        98.18%          132,281
                                                        -------------                  -------------
                                                           46,509,472                     45,514,141

WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING                                                       45,514,141

NET LOSS                                                                               ($117,800,737)

NET LOSS PER SHARE                                                                            ($2.59)
                                                                                       =============
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000814070
<NAME> DRY DAIRY INTERNATIONAL INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  190,834
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     71,730
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               262,564
<PP&E>                                         608,567
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 871,131
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          932,936
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,657,893
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,721,805)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   871,131
<SALES>                                        527,628
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               538,724
<CGS>                                          330,006
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  323,349
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,039
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,414
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (130,084)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (130,084)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.00)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Gregory A. Wells, Chief Financial
Officer of NTS Capital Corporation, the general partner of NTS-Properties Associates VII, the
general partner of NTS-Properties VII, Ltd. (the Partnership), certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

|1. |  | The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Partnership for the period ended September
               30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
               Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: November 15, 2004

/s/ Gregory A. Wells

---

Chief Financial Officer of NTS Capital Corporation,
General Partner of NTS-Properties Associates VII,
General Partner of NTS-Properties VII, Ltd.

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be
retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
1 The Honorable Patrick A. Conmy, United St ates District Judge for the District of North Dakota, sitting in the District of Minnesota. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 10-1349

___________ Steven M. Maus, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Brian N. Toder and * Chestnut & Cambronne, P.A., * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: October 18, 2010 Filed: October 25, 2010

___________ Before RILEY, Chief Judge, BYE and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Steven M. Maus appeals the district court's 1 grant of summary judgment in favor of Brian N. Toder and Chestnut & Cambronne, P.A. We affirm. The dispute giving rise to this action is an attorney's lien for unpaid attorney fees in the amount of $81,778.93 held by the appellees on Maus's partnership dissolution trust account. After a state court entered judgment for the lien and the-2- Minnesota Court of Appeals affirm ed the judgment, Maus v. Galic , No. A06-1183, 2007 WL 1248160, at *2 (Minn. Ct. App. May 1, 2007), Maus brought this action in federal court seeking an accounting; he also stated claims for usury, breach of fiduciary duty, and an allege d violation of the Truth inLending Act (TILA), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1601-1667f. The district court conclude d the claim for an accounting was barred by the doctrine of collateral estoppel because of determinations made in the Minnesota state court proceedings; the district court further concluded the claims for usury, breach of fiduciary duty, and the alleged TILA violation e ither failed on the merits or were time-barred. Maus v. Toder , 681 F. Supp. 2d 1007, 1013-19 (D. Minn. 2010). Having carefully reviewed the record de novo, as well as the parties' briefs, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its thorough and well-reasoned decision. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
# C_2014175EN.01005502.xml

| 10.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 175/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/55

---

Action brought on 21 March 2014 — ZZ v OHIM

(Case F-24/14)

2014/C 175/79

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: H. Tettenborn, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the applicant’s appraisal report covering the period from 1st October 2011 to 31st December 2012 and claim for damages.

st

st

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the appraisal report issued to the applicant in respect of the period from 1st October 2011 to 31st December 2012 as finalized and signed by the Reporting Officer; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the appraisal report issued to the applicant in respect of the period from 1st October 2011 to 31st December 2012 as finalized and signed by the Reporting Officer;

st

st

| — | Order OHIM to pay an adequate compensation at the discretion of the Court — not below an amount of 500 Euro — to the applicant for the moral and immaterial damages suffered by him as a result of the contested Appraisal Report; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay an adequate compensation at the discretion of the Court — not below an amount of 500 Euro — to the applicant for the moral and immaterial damages suffered by him as a result of the contested Appraisal Report;

| — | Order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the costs.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CYBEX COMPUTER PRODUCTS CORPORATION FOR THE YEAR
ENDED MAR-31-1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           2,411
<SECURITIES>                                    37,961
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,394
<ALLOWANCES>                                       963
<INVENTORY>                                      6,047
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                56,470
<PP&E>                                           8,674
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,422
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  70,719
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,038
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                      54,726
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    70,719
<SALES>                                         52,564
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                52,564
<CGS>                                           24,979
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,979
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   718
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  21
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,079
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,508
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,571
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.42
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.37


                          DIRECTOR COMPENSATION POLICY

         The Human Resources Committee reviews and recommends the compensation
for directors. During 2002 each of the directors who was not employed by the
Company received an annual Board retainer of $30,000, an annual committee
retainer for each committee on which the director served of $5,000 ($6,000 for
chairpersons) and a fee of $1,500 for each special Board meeting attended and
$1,000 for each special committee meeting attended. The Human Resources
Committee changed the compensation for directors for 2003 so that during 2003
each of the directors who is not employed by the Company will receive an annual
Board retainer of $30,000, an annual retainer for service on the audit committee
of $10,000 ($15,000 for chairpersons) and an annual retainer for service on any
other committee of $7,500 ($12,500 for chairpersons). No additional fees will be
paid for special meetings. Subject to stockholder approval of the Company's
Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors, non-employee directors
may defer these fees into this plan until their retirement or resignation from
the Board. Three of the directors have elected to participate in this deferred
compensation plan, subject to stockholder approval of this plan.

         In addition, non-employee directors receive a grant of a non-qualified
stock option to purchase 10,000 shares of common stock under the 1997 Omnibus
Stock Option and Incentive Plan upon their election to the Board, at an exercise
price equal to the closing price on the date prior to the date of the grant,
which becomes exercisable in four equal annual installments. During 2002 each of
the directors who was not employed by the Company received an annual grant of a
non-qualified stock option to purchase 7,000 shares of common stock under the
1997 Omnibus Stock Option and Incentive Plan, at an exercise price equal to the
closing price on the date prior to the date of the grant, which is immediately
exercisable. During 2003 each of the directors who is not employed by the
Company will receive an annual grant of a non-qualified stock option to purchase
5,000 shares of common stock under the 1997 Omnibus Stock Option and Incentive
Plan, at an exercise price equal to the closing price on the date prior to the
date of the grant, which becomes exercisable on the first anniversary of the
grant.

         Directors who are employed by the Company do not receive compensation
for their service as directors. All directors are reimbursed for expenses
incurred in attending meetings.
Exhibit 32.1



     Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

         In connection with the filing of the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for
the Quarter Ended June 30, 2003 (the  "Report") by Healthcare  Properties,  L.P.
("Registrant"), the undersigned hereby certifies that:

         1.       The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section
                  13(a) or  15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  as
                  amended, and

         2.       The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of Registrant.


                                                /s/ Robert Lankford
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Robert Lankford Chief
                                                executive officer and Chief
                                                financial officer of the
                                                General Partner
                                                August 14, 2003
**Deprurt~ntofEne~** 

### Energy Efficiency Program for Commercial and Industrial**Equip~nt:** 

### Efficiency Standardsfor**Co~rcial** 

### HVAC and WaterHeating Products

9:00 - 9:05 am 9:05 - 9:15 am 9:15 - 9:30 am 9:30 - 10:15 am 10: 15 - 10:30 am 10:30 - 12:30 noon

12:30 - 1:30pm

1:30 - 3:00 pm

3:00 - 3:15 pm 3: 15 - 4:30pm 4:30 - 4:45 pm 4:45 - 5:00pm 5:00pm 

### Public Workshop Agenda July 11, 2000 Opening - Cyrus Nasseri Agenda Review and Overview - Doug Brookman DOE Process and Inclinations - Cyrus Nasseri BriefOpening Statements by Stakeholders Break Commercial Product Screening Analysis - Presentation by PNNL, Comments by Stakeholders, and Discussion • Methodology • Results and Interpretations • Product Categories not included in the Analysis Lunch - (on yourown) DOE Inclinations based onthe Screening Analysis - Presentation by Cyrus Nasseri, Comments by Stakeholders, and Discussion • Adopt ASHRAE 90.1-1999 energy efficiency levels (20 products) • Conduct further analyses (9 products) • Suggest ASHRAE addenda (4 products) • Retain current EPCAenergy efficiency levels (1 product) Break Future Analytical Issues Next Steps - Cyrus Nasseri Closing Adjourn
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN

Eou. Ytanley Tilmlns CountyAttoraeJr iiarrluon

County Mamahall,

Terns Dear dir:

**or tii**  oanutltution, that oountyat~orneyu 

### y eueh

reet3 a0 zmy bo 019 

### 809, cI c. P*, p0~idnot be antitlod

to 

### reef4

**, howorm,** 

**a** nilodermanor



### ee@e **hao** been 

### ap**poala4 ham** **the** oorporation



### aowt **tn** the oouuty

### wart, maah oouti harina attoruog



### ha0 omap li urUAiQticm thereat, and tbs qaua%y 

### oil in allrsegsots

withArt. 1070, c. a, P., th0 

### oounty atz.ernsy



### ie antitle&.

to hfr r08 

### a0 prottdocl

in Art. 1461, 0. 0. F., whiixh 

### readat"Di&rlOtand aountyattormys shall **be** auowed the r0iioting r008 in oases tried la the dlstrlot

or oountyCourts, or a oounty court at law, to ba taxed a6alnsttho der0+- ant: ***For 8~ery**  **ooavlotion timlw**  ~alnstgamingwheanoappoalIs wheu, OR **ap** al, the j-t la fitteen **do1**

**r am.**  "For amary other sonvlotlon

_ _ _ zamiemeanor, where no appeal 18 taken, or %:a: appeal.

the judgmnt Is arrinnnd, ten *

. Artiole 857, CAP., Qwvldarr *Trials do noY0. justlos and oorpra~lon In all appeals iron oourts to the oouuty oowrt,the trial abellbe **do** nova Irr the oounty oourt, tha sam a8 **it** tha prosooutIon had been arl.&%ally OaraWnoa4

in that Ooart.b **7fhdotsaoriag** aura). Llkawlsa,

xrtlolos

876 and 877, C&P., provide: "krt. 876. Appeal

**“ Appeah**  **tram** 6 a43rQoratlon olrrt shall be heard by the county court SIC **t** in okas s1 where the oountyoourthaa no Jur stliatlon, In whloh oountias

such appealsshall be heard **by** the propar**court.** In suoh appeala the trialahall be da IIOTO.Said appeals shall bs governed by the rrrlss ot praotlcse

and procedure for appeal&i

fromjMtiO8 Courtie0 the oounty oourt,a8 far CWB applloabls.m 'Art. 877. DIsmsItlon Of iOf% %m rim lrnposebd

onappe~IL

and t&n acmtm imposed

on appeal aad In the corporaticla CoPrt shallbe eolleoted

ct the deiendant, **and** snob fins and the aost ot t&a corporation oourtwhen oollsoted

shallbe pai4 tit0 the munics%paLtFMSwry.*

### 429

The cou+iotlon

being,**it 6th**  **4s the**  oaso, in flao countyoourt,

and being,tier the quotedstatutes. 8 trial de 1~100,

and the oountyattorney ha~w ccmplbd dth mt. 1070, aapra.he *RUM be enfltled to the stat&ary foe ot ten dollarsr andortho ofroumakmoosset out lJl your oollmuniaatloIa. Trusting that we bavs rratistaotorlly enmorod y0n.r Inquiry,

we remain Yowrr tory truly

Aa;9L

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TmS

**COMMlREE**
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

I, Brian F. Lavin, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

To the best of my knowledge and belief, the quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 15, 2003, by NTS-Properties VII, Ltd. and to which
this certification is appended (the "Periodic Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Periodic Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NTS-
Properties VII, Ltd.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
NTS-Properties VII, Ltd. and will be retained by NTS-Properties VII, Ltd. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ Brian F. Lavin
President of NTS Capital Corporation,
General Partner of NTS-Properties Associates VII,
General Partner of NTS-Properties VII, Ltd.