alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Contact Us

#   Independent Commercial Importers (ICIs)

Independent Commercial Importers (ICIs) are entities that have obtained EPA credentials to legally import vehicles into the United States.
                - List of ICIs currently registered with EPA (pdf)  (EPA-420-F-22-020, May 2022)   NOTE: EPA provides this list of ICIs as a reference only. EPA DOES NOT ENDORSE ANY ICI ON THIS LIST. 
                - Certificate Review Sheet for Independent Commercial Importers (ICIs) (pdf)  (February 2020, EPA-420-B-20-009)

## How to Become an ICI

Any person or business that wants to become an Independent Commercial Importer (ICI) should first become knowledgeable about the requirements for ICIs (40 CFR Part 85, Subpart P) and for EPA vehicle and certification (40 CFR Part 86). Prospective ICIs must obtain at least one Certificate of Conformity from EPA in accordance with those regulatory requirements. For more information on how to become an ICI, please refer to the Certification and Guidance page.

**The first step in the process is to notify EPA via a letter of intent sent to:**

ICI Team LeaderUnited States Environmental Protection AgencyCompliance Division2000 Traverwood DriveAnn Arbor, MI 48105

## How to Use an ICI to Import a Vehicle

Individuals who wish to import a vehicle that does not conform to United States emission standards or qualify for an exemption must engage an ICI to modify, test, and certify the vehicle so that it does.

It is important to understand that ICI import authority is generally limited to specific vehicle makes and models. Before making your import arrangements, you should contact your ICI to confirm that it is qualified to import your particular vehicle. Furthermore, ICI designation does not automatically confer approval of the ICI’s treatment of an imported vehicle. EPA will carefully scrutinize the ICI’s test documentation and other information concerning the quality of modifications to a given vehicle to determine whether it meets all the applicable EPA requirements under the imports regulations.

          -  Importing Vehicles and Engines Home 
          -  Learn About Importing Vehicles and Engines 
          -  Publications and Forms 
          -  Importing Canadian Vehicles 
          -  Independent Commercial Importers (ICI) 
          -  Certification Guidance 
          -  Exporting United States Vehicles or Engines 

Contact Us
Exhibit 10.1

















SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE


















	
AMOUNT: $30,000

	
DATE: April 26, 2017






















For value received, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, VerifyMe, Inc., a Nevada corporation, (the “Company”) promises to pay to the order of ________________ (the “Payee”) Thirty Thousand and 0/100 Dollars ($30,000), whose address is ____________________, in lawful money of the United States of America, together with interest thereon at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum from the date hereof.







Interest on the principal amount at the stated rate shall accrue from the date hereof and shall be payable monthly on the last day of each month beginning May 31, 2017. The entire principal balance shall be payable in full on October 31, 2017.







This Secured Promissory Note (this “Note”) is secured by a first lien on all of the assets of the Company in accordance with a Security Agreement dated the date of this Note.







The Company shall have the right to prepay all or any part of this Note at any time without penalty. All payments shall be credited first to interest with the balance, if any, to be applied to principal. Provided, however, that if the Company completes a financing of at least $750,000 prior to the due date, the principal of this Note shall automatically convert into $60,000 of the same securities as the Company has sold on identical terms.







In the event any action is required to enforce the terms hereof, the prevailing party shall pay reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred in connection therewith.

       



	 	 
	
Norman A. Gardner

	 
	
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
§ 1.924 What process applies to a petition requesting a waiver? ( a ) In general, the procedures set forth in § 10.30 of this chapter govern our response to a petition requesting a waiver.
( b ) Under § 10.30(h)(3) of this chapter, we will publish a notice in the Federal Register, requesting information and views on a filed petition, including information and views from persons who could be affected by the waiver if the petition were to be granted.
( c ) Under § 10.30(e)(3) of this chapter, we will respond to the petitioner in writing. ( 1 ) If we grant the petition, either in whole or in part, we will publish a notice in the Federal Register setting forth any waiver and the reasons for such waiver.
( 2 ) If we deny the petition (including partial denials), our written response to the petitioner will explain the reason(s) for the denial.
( d ) We will make readily accessible to the public, and periodically update, a list of filed petitions requesting waivers, including the status of each petition (for example, pending, granted, or denied).
#### Carol C. Lowe *v.*Morton E. Lowe

King, C. J., Alcorn, House, Cotter and Ryan, Js.

Argued November 4

decided November 6, 1969

*Sigmund L. Miller,*for the appellant-appellee (plaintiff).

*Joel C. Karp,*with whom, on the brief, were *Leonard A. 8chine*and *Robert L. Julianelle,*for the appellee-appellant (defendant).

Per Curiam.

Neither the plaintiff on her appeal nor the defendant on his cross appeal has sustained the burden of showing material, prejudicial error requiring a new trial.

There is no error on either appeal.
EXHIBIT 5

                                TASTY FRIES, INC
                               650 Sentry Parkway
                                    Suite One
                               Blue Bell, PA 19422
                                 (610) 941-2109
                               FAX (610) 941-2108

LOUIS M. KELLY

                                                February 20, 2003

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

      Re: Tasty Fries, Inc. Registration Statement on Form S-8

Gentlemen:

      I am in-house counsel to Tasty Fries, Inc., a Nevada Corporation
(hereinafter referred to as the "Company"), in connection with the registration
of 700,000 shares of the Company's common stock, par value $.0001 per share
("Common Stock"), as set forth in the above mentioned Registration Statement. In
my capacity as such counsel to the Company, I have examined the original or
copies of such records of the Company and such other documents we deem
appropriate as the basis for the opinions herein expressed. In such examination
I have assumed the genuiness of all of the signatures on original documents and
the conformity to original documents of all copies submitted to me as conformed
or photostatic copies. As to various questions of fact materials to such
opinions, I have relied upon the statements or certificates of officials and
representatives of the Company and others.

      Based on the foregoing, it is my opinion that:

      1. The Company is a corporation incorporated under the general corporation
laws of the Sate of Nevada and its status is active.

      2. When (i) the Registration Statement has become effective under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Act"), (ii) the 700,000 shares of
common stock have been issued and sold as contemplated in the Registration
Statement and (iii) certificates representing the 700,000 shares of Common Stock
have been duly executed, delivered and paid for, such shares of Common Stock
will be legally issued, fully paid and non-assessable.

      I hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement.

Sincerely,
Louis M. Kelly, Esq.
Tasty Fries, Inc.
§ 520.2220b Sulfadimethoxine suspension. ( a ) *Specifications.* Each milliliter of suspension contains 50 milligrams (mg) sulfadimethoxine.
( b ) *Sponsors.* See Nos. 000061 and 054771 in § 510.600(c) of this chapter.
( c ) *Conditions of use in dogs and cats* — ( 1 ) *Amount.* Administer orally 25 mg per pound of body weight, followed by 12.5 mg per pound of body weight daily until the animal is free of clinical signs for 48 hours.
( 2 ) *Indications for use.* For the treatment of sulfadimethoxine-susceptible bacterial infections in dogs and cats and enteritis associated with coccidiosis in dogs.
( 3 ) *Limitations.* Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian.
[79 FR 28829, May 20, 2014, as amended at 88 FR 55564, Aug. 16, 2023]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Vitran Corporation
Inc., that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report of Vitran Corporation Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Vitran Corporation Inc.



|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                           
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------------
|                      |  |  | 
|Date: October 6, 2011 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Richard E. Gaetz      
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Richard E. Gaetz          
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | President and             
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer   
|                      |  |  | 
|                      |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Fayaz D. Suleman      
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Fayaz D. Suleman          
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Vice President Finance and
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
Top of page

Skip to main content

Library of Congress

              - Discover
              - Services
              - Visit
              - Education
              - Connect
              - Shop *external link*
              - Donate
              - About
              - Ask a Librarian
              - Help
              - Contact
              - Search Online Catalog
              - Copyright.gov
              - Congress.gov

Library of Congress
Digital Collections
A Century of Lawmaking for a New Nation: U.S. Congressional Documents and Debates 1774 to 1875
Articles and Essays
Debates of Congress
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-14-00630- CR

David Brow ne, Appellan t

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F CO MAL CO UNTY, 207 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. CR2013 -46 6, H ONO RAB LE DIB WALDRIP , JUDGE P RESIDING

O R D ER P ER CURIAM

The State’s brief was orig inally due on J uly 7, 2015. On counsel’ s m otions, the deadline for fi l ing was extended to September 30. State’s counsel has now filed a third motion reque sting that the Court extend the time for filing the State’s brief an additional 30 day s. We g rant the m otion for ex tension of t ime and orde r State’s c ounsel to file a brief no later than October 30, 2015. No further extension of time will be g rante d, and failure to comply with this order will result in the case being submitt ed to this Court on the appellant’s brie f alone
.

I t is ordere d on October

2, 2015.

Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Goodwin, and B ourland Do Not Publish
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7653 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to update certain terminology 

regarding veteran employment. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 13, 2024 

Mr. DAVIS of North Carolina (for himself and Mr. CISCOMANI) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to update certain 

terminology regarding veteran employment. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Employment 

5 Readiness Yield Act of 2024’’ or the ‘‘VERY Act of 

6 2024’’. 

7 SEC. 2. UPDATE OF CERTAIN TERMINOLOGY REGARDING 

8 VETERAN EMPLOYMENT. 

9 Title 38, United States Code, is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 7653 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘employment handicap’’ each 

2 place it occurs and inserting ‘‘employment barrier’’; 

3 and 

4 (2) by striking ‘‘employment handicaps’’ each 

5 place it occurs and inserting ‘‘employment barriers’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           4,553                   5,499
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,867                  39,113
<ALLOWANCES>                                       621                     598
<INVENTORY>                                     35,548                  35,061
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                86,660                  98,708
<PP&E>                                         118,215                 113,695
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 225,815                 239,350
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,058                  39,461
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           707                     700
<OTHER-SE>                                     161,269                 177,137
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   225,815                 239,350
<SALES>                                        231,934                 257,872
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               231,934                 257,872
<CGS>                                           86,134                 109,338
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   86,134                 109,338
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               104,495                 116,057
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,109                   1,951
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 39,196                  30,526
<INCOME-TAX>                                    15,051                  10,684
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    24,145                  19,842
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.34                    0.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.34                    0.28


</TABLE>
§ 640.72 Records. ( a ) In addition to the recordkeeping requirements of this subchapter, the following records shall be maintained: ( 1 ) Documentation shall be available to ensure that the shipping temperature requirements of § 600.15 of this title and of § 640.74(b)(2) are being met for Source Plasma intended for manufacture into injectable products.
( 2 ) ( i ) For each donor, establishments must maintain records including a separate and complete record of initial and periodic examinations, tests, laboratory data, and interviews, etc., as required in §§ 630.10 and 630.15 of this chapter and §§ 640.65, 640.66, and 640.67, except as provided in paragraph (a)(2)(ii) of this section.
( ii ) Negative results for testing for evidence of infection due to relevant transfusion-transmitted infections required in § 610.40 of this chapter, and the volume or weight of plasma withdrawn from a donor need not be recorded on the individual donor record if such information is maintained on the premises of the plasmapheresis center where the donor's plasma has been collected.
( 3 ) The original or a clear copy or other durable record which may be electronic of the donor's consent for participation in the plasmapheresis program or for immunization.
( 4 ) Records of the medical history and physical examination of the donor conducted in accordance with § 630.15(b)(1) of this chapter and, where applicable, § 630.15(b)(5) of this chapter must document the eligibility of the donor as a plasmapheresis donor and, when applicable, as an immunized donor.
( 5 ) If plasma that is reactive to a serologic test for syphilis is issued as prescribed in § 640.65(b)(2)(iv), the distribution records shall indicate by number those units that are reactive.
( b ) Each donor record must be directly cross-referenced to the unit(s) of Source Plasma associated with the donor.
( c ) If a repeat donor is rejected or a donor's plasma is found unsuitable, the donor's record shall contain a full explanation for the rejection.
( d ) If a donor has a reaction while on the plasmapheresis premises, or a donor reaction is reported to the center after the donor has left the premises, the donor's record shall contain a full explanation of the reaction, including the measures taken to assist the donor and the outcome of the incident.
[41 FR 10770, Mar. 12, 1976, as amended at 50 FR 4140, Jan. 29, 1985; 53 FR 117, Jan. 5, 1988; 64 FR 45374, Aug. 19, 1999; 67 FR 9587, Mar. 4, 2002; 80 FR 29905, May 22, 2015]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk July 24, 2012

t0716 

# Order

July 24, 2012

144949

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 144949

COA: 299151

Muskegon CC: 09

- 058530

- FC

DENNIS LONNIE

- ALFRED WARD,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 24, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6168

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WILLIAM DURAN SPEIGHT, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Joseph Robert Goodwin, District Judge. (CR-99-189; 2:02-cv-01182) Submitted: August 24, 2006 Decided: August 29, 2006 Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Duran Speight, Appellant Pro Se. Kasey Warner, United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: William Duran Speight seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Speight has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7606 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

1087 Route 47 South in Rio Grande, New Jersey, as the ‘‘Carlton 

H. Hand Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 8, 2024 

Mr. VAN DREW (for himself, Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Mr. KEAN of New 

Jersey, Mr. NORCROSS, Mr. KIM of New Jersey, Mr. GOTTHEIMER, Mr. 

PALLONE, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. PASCRELL, Mr. PAYNE, Ms. SHERRILL, 

and Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1087 Route 47 South in Rio Grande, New 

Jersey, as the ‘‘Carlton H. Hand Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CARLTON H. HAND POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 1087 Route 47 South in Rio 

6 Grande, New Jersey, shall be known and designated as 

7 the ‘‘Carlton H. Hand Post Office Building’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7606 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Carlton H. Hand Post 

5 Office Building’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS