alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014351EN.01000701.xml

| 6.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 351/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 351/7

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from Supreme Court (Ireland) made on 7 August 2014 — C v M

(Case C-376/14)

2014/C 351/09

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Referring court

Supreme Court

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: C

Applicant:

Defendant: M

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Does the existence of the French proceedings relating to the custody of the child preclude, in the circumstances of this case, the establishment of habitual residence of the child in Ireland? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does the existence of the French proceedings relating to the custody of the child preclude, in the circumstances of this case, the establishment of habitual residence of the child in Ireland?

| 2. | Does either the father or the French courts continue to maintain custody rights in relation to the child so as to render wrongful the retention of the child in Ireland? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Does either the father or the French courts continue to maintain custody rights in relation to the child so as to render wrongful the retention of the child in Ireland?

| 3. | Are the Irish courts entitled to consider the question of habitual residence of the child in the circumstances where she has resided in Ireland since July, 2012 at which time her removal to Ireland was not in breach of French law? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Are the Irish courts entitled to consider the question of habitual residence of the child in the circumstances where she has resided in Ireland since July, 2012 at which time her removal to Ireland was not in breach of French law?

---
# C_2014085EN.01002802.xml

| 22.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 85/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 85/28

---

Action brought on 29 January 2014 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-7/14)

2014/C 85/49

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: A. Salerno, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the Commission decision to reduce to two years instead of three the extension period of the temporary staff contract of the applicant.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the European Commission of 18 July 2013 reducing from three to two years the extension period of the temporary staff contract of the applicant granted by decision of 23 November 2011; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the European Commission of 18 July 2013 reducing from three to two years the extension period of the temporary staff contract of the applicant granted by decision of 23 November 2011;

| — | Fix at EUR 45 000, together with default interest, the amount of compensation due to the applicant in the event that the Commission is, lawfully, unable to reinstate the applicant for the period of one year; |
| --- | --- |

—

Fix at EUR 45 000, together with default interest, the amount of compensation due to the applicant in the event that the Commission is, lawfully, unable to reinstate the applicant for the period of one year;

| — | Order the Commission to pay the entirety of the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the entirety of the costs.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM IDS MANAGED
FUTURES II, L.P. FOR THE SECOND QUARTER OF 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       6,420,220
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,488
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,453,709
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,453,709
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          117,173
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,336,535
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,453,709
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             (599,230)
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  144,875
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (744,105)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (744,105)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (744,105)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (53.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (53.43)


</TABLE>
### Storage requirements for Arkansas streams

By: James Lee Patterson

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1859G

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 41 (Wednesday, March 3, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 9574]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4320]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Tehama County Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Tehama County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet 
in Red Bluff, California. Agenda items to be covered include: (1) 
Introductions, (2) Approval of Minutes, (3) Public Comment, (4) 
Chairman's Perspective, (5) Elect Vice Chairmen, (6) Next Agenda.

DATES: The meeting will be held on March 25, 2010 from 9 a.m. and end 
at approximately 12 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Lincoln Street School, Pine 
Room, 1135 Lincoln Street, Red Bluff, CA. Individuals wishing to speak 
or propose agenda items must send their names and proposals to Randy 
Jero, Committee Coordinator, 825 N. Humboldt Ave., Willows, CA 95988.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Randy Jero, Committee Coordinator, 
USDA, Mendocino National Forest, Grindstone Ranger District, 825 N. 
Humboldt Ave, Willows, CA 95988. (530) 934-1269; e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#790b131c0b16391f0a571f1c1d570c0a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="addfc7c8dfc2edcbde83cbc8c983d8de">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Committee 
discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Committee members. 
However, persons who wish to bring matters to the attention of the 
Committee may file written statements with the Committee staff before 
or after the meeting. Public input sessions will be provided and 
individuals who made written requests by March 22, 2010 will have the 
opportunity to address the committee at those sessions.

Eduardo Olmedo,
Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 2010-4320 Filed 3-2-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[J-17-2021] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Appellee

v.
ALLEN BROWN, Appellant : : : : : : : : : : : 24 WAP 2020 Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court entered 3/10/20 at No. 916 WDA 2019, affirming the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County entered 6/6/19 at No. CP-02-CR-0008971- 2005
SUBMITTED: January 21, 2021

ORDER

PER CURIAM
AND NOW , this 25th day of March , 2021, this appeal is dismissed as having been improvidently granted.
Editorial Note on Part 73
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 73 appear at 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001.

§ 73.1550 Talc. ( a ) *Identity.* ( 1 ) The color additive talc is a finely powdered, native, hydrous magnesium silicate sometimes containing a small proportion of aluminum silicate.
( 2 ) Color additive mixtures for drug use made with talc may contain only those diluents listed in this subpart as safe and suitable for use in color additive mixtures for coloring drugs.
( b ) *Specifications.* Talc shall meet the specifications for talc in the United States Pharmacopeia XX (1980) and the following: Lead (as Pb), not more than 20 parts per million. Arsenic (as As), not more than 3 parts per million.
Lead and arsenic shall be determined in the solution obtained by boiling 10 grams of the talc for 15 minutes in 50 milliliters of 0.5*N* hydrochloric acid.
( c ) *Uses and restrictions.* Talc may be safely used in amounts consistent with good manufacturing practice to color drugs generally.
( d ) *Labeling requirements.* The label of the color additive and of any mixtures prepared therefrom intended solely or in part for coloring purposes shall conform to the requirements of § 70.25 of this chapter.
( e ) *Exemption from certification.* Certification of this color additive is not necessary for the protection of the public health, and therefore batches thereof are exempt from the certification requirements of section 721(c) of the act.
[42 FR 15643, Mar. 22, 1977, as amended at 49 FR 10089, Mar. 19, 1984]
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7620 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7620

 To amend the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act to require the 
acceptance of cash payments for entrance fees at units of the National 
                              Park System.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 2024

Mr. Norman (for himself, Mrs. Peltola, Mr. Posey, Mr. Rose, Mr. Rouzer, 
Mr. Lamborn, Ms. Mace, Mr. Carter of Georgia, Mr. Zinke, Mr. Rosendale, 
 and Ms. Boebert) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act to require the 
acceptance of cash payments for entrance fees at units of the National 
                              Park System.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Access to Recreation with 
Cash Act'' or the ``PARC Act''.

SEC. 2. ACCEPTANCE OF CASH PAYMENTS FOR ENTRANCE FEES AT UNITS OF THE 
              NATIONAL PARK SYSTEM.

    Section 803(e) of the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act (16 
U.S.C. 6802(e)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) Acceptance of cash payments required.--The Secretary 
        of the Interior shall require that any unit of the National 
        Park System at which an entrance fee is charged in accordance 
        with paragraph (1) accept cash as a form of payment for the 
        entrance fee.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET OF ADVANCED GAMING TECHNOLOGY, INC. AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND THE
RELATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS, EQUITY AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE THREE AND NINE
MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             132
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       26
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        110
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   271
<PP&E>                                           1,014
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,767
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,052
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,002
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           551
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,501)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,052
<SALES>                                            313
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   313
<CGS>                                              123
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,175
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,318)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 957
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,622)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,622)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
---

Exhibit 13.A

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with Annual Report of Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal period ended May 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joao Manuel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge: 1.
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materials respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Joao Manuel 
    Joao Manuel
    (principal executive officer) Dated: August 29, 2011 The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.


---
38611.

#### LESTER v. WHITEHEAD.

Decided February 21, 1961.

*Raymond E, Lester,*for plaintiff in error.

*Vane G. Hawkins, Marvin D. Pierce,*contra.

Felton, Chief Judge.

Unless the plaintiff in error can show that the plaintiff in the court below as a matter of law was not entitled to recover, the judgment of the trial court is correct. There was no demurrer to the petition. Construing the petition in favor of the plaintiff it alleges that the defendant agreed to pay him a 10% commission on all sales which he procured from the two named prospective purchasers, who were the plaintiff’s clients. The evidence was conflicting, but the testimony authorized a verdict for the plaintiff. It did not demand a verdict for either party. The plaintiff in error contends that the essential elements of a valid contract were not *182proved. The principal point urged is that the proof did not show a meeting of the minds of the parties. The testimony of the parties was in direct conflict as to- whether the contract alleged was entered into. The evidence authorized a finding that there was such a contract. It seems to be the contention of the plaintiff in error that because the defendant denied the contract there was no meeting of the minds. Such a contention is patently without merit for the very obvious reason that the credibility of witnesses is a question exclusively for the jury under the circumstances here. The defendant in error may as well argue that he should have a verdict as a matter of law because he testified that there was such a contract. The sole question in this case was which party the jury believed as to whether the contract alleged was made. The court did not err in overruling the motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict.

Another contention of the plaintiff in error is that the evidence did not authorize the amount found by the jury which was about half what it should have been in view of the finding for the plaintiff in the trial court. There is no exception to the overruling of a motion for a new trial, so, since there is no showing that the defendant in the trial court was entitled to a verdict in his favor as a matter of law, the contention is without merit. As we see it the motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict does not raise the point involved in this second contention of the plaintiff in error.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Nichols and*Bell, *JJ., concur.*
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) of Mackie Designs Inc. of our report dated February 10, 1997
included in the 1996 Annual Report to Shareholders of Mackie Designs Inc., and
we consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-98720) pertaining to the 1995 Stock Option Plan of Mackie
Designs Inc.

         Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Mackie
Designs Inc. listed in Item 14(a).  This schedule is the responsibility of the
Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our
audits.  In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above,
when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements
taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set
forth therein.



                                        ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Seattle, Washington
March 25, 1997
Editorial Note on Part 173
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 173 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; and 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 173.250 Methyl alcohol residues. Methyl alcohol may be present in the following foods under the conditions specified: ( a ) In spice oleoresins as a residue from the extraction of spice, at a level not to exceed 50 parts per million.
( b ) In hops extract as a residue from the extraction of hops, at a level not to exceed 2.2 percent by weight; *Provided,* That: ( 1 ) The hops extract is added to the wort before or during cooking in the manufacture of beer.
( 2 ) The label of the hops extract specifies the presence of methyl alcohol and provides for the use of the hops extract only as prescribed by paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 107 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 107

  To provide for the reliquidation of certain entries of clock radios.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 24, 2005

 Mr. Levin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
        referred to the Committee on FinanceYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for the reliquidation of certain entries of clock radios.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN ENTRIES OF SOUNDSPA CLOCK RADIOS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 514 of the Tariff Act of 
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514) or any other provision of law, within 180 days 
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Customs Service shall 
liquidate or reliquidate each entry described in subsection (c), 
containing merchandise which at the time of the original liquidation 
was classified under subheading 8527.19.50, at the rate of duty that 
would have been applicable to such merchandise if such merchandise had 
been classified under subheading 8527.19.10 on the date of such entry.
    (b) Refund of Amounts Owed.--Any amounts owed by the United States 
under subsection (a) shall be paid with interest.
    (c) Affected Entries.--The entries referred to in subsection (a) 
are as follows:

Entry number
110-1199345-7
110-1199542-9
110-1199558-5
110-1201694-4
110-3759754-8
110-3759785-2
101-4082299-9
101-4088073-2
101-4089053-3
101-4120875-0
101-4133671-8
101-4138302-5
101-4145092-3
101-4148477-3
101-4153108-6
101-4159322-7
101-4158601-5
101-4163243-9
101-4164448-3
101-4168318-4
101-4172197-6
101-4172489-7
101-4193123-7
101-4264820-2
101-4271724-7
101-4277850-4
101-4287672-0
101-4301588-0
101-4306238-7
101-4306235-3
101-6011727-0
101-6012796-4
101-6015492-7
101-6021099-2
101-6026903-0
101-6024120-3
101-6028079-7
101-6027052-5
101-6036728-9
101-6048069-4
101-6079830-1
101-6082949-4
101-6115954-5
101-6119379-1
101-6127048-2
101-6150035-9
101-6148556-9
101-6172630-1
101-6172406-6
101-6186497-9
101-4208407-7
101-6035939-3
                                 <all>
```