alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 830.100 FDA accreditation of an issuing agency. ( a ) *Eligibility.* A private organization may apply for accreditation as an issuing agency.
( b ) *Accreditation criteria.* FDA may accredit an organization as an issuing agency, if the system it will operate: ( 1 ) Will employ unique device identifiers (UDIs) that meet the requirements of this part to adequately identify a device through its distribution and use;
( 2 ) Conforms to each of the following international standards: ( i ) ISO/IEC 15459-2, which is incorporated by reference at § 830.10;
( ii ) ISO/IEC 15459-4, which is incorporated by reference at § 830.10;
( iii ) ISO/IEC 15459-6, which is incorporated by reference at § 830.10.
( 3 ) Uses only characters and numbers from the invariant character set of ISO/IEC 646, which is incorporated by reference at § 830.10.
( 4 ) Will be available to all users according to a single set of consistent, fair, and reasonable terms and conditions.
( 5 ) Will protect against conflicts of interest between the issuing agency (and its officers, employees, and other agents) and labelers (and their officers, employees, and other agents) seeking to use UDIs that may impede the applicant's ability to independently operate a fair and neutral identifier system.
Editorial Note on Part 73
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 73 appear at 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001.

§ 73.600 Turmeric. ( a ) *Identity.* ( 1 ) The color additive turmeric is the ground rhizome of Curcuma longa L. The definition of turmeric in this paragraph is for the purpose of identity as a color additive only, and shall not be construed as setting forth an official standard for turmeric under section 401 of the act.
( 2 ) Color additive mixtures made with turmeric may contain as diluents only those substances listed in this subpart as safe and suitable in color additive mixtures for coloring foods.
( b ) *Uses and restrictions.* Turmeric may be safely used for the coloring of foods generally, in amounts consistent with good manufacturing practice, except that it may not be used to color foods for which standards of identity have been promulgated under section 401 of the act, unless the use of added color is authorized by such standards.
( c ) *Labeling.* The color additive and any mixtures intended solely or in part for coloring purposes prepared therefrom shall bear, in addition to the other information required by the act, labeling in accordance with the provisions of § 70.25 of this chapter.
( d ) *Exemption from certification.* Certification of this color additive is not necessary for the protection of the public health, and therefore batches thereof are exempt from the certification requirements of section 721(c) of the act.
Editorial Note on Part 73
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 73 appear at 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001.

§ 73.1327 Chromium oxide greens. ( a ) *Identity.* ( 1 ) The color additive chromium oxide greens is principally chromic sesquioxide (Cr2O3).
( 2 ) Color additive mixtures for drug use made with chromium oxide greens may contain only those diluents listed in this subpart as safe and suitable for use in color additive mixtures for coloring drugs.
( b ) *Specifications.* the color additive chormium oxide greens shall conform to the following specifications and shall be free from impurities other than those named to the extent that such impurities may be avoided by good manufacturing practice: Chromium in 2% NaOH extract, not more than 0.075% as Cr2O3 (based on sample weight). Arsenic (as As), not more than 3 parts per million. Lead (as Pb), not more than 20 parts per million. Mercury (as Hg), not more than 1 part per million. Cr2O3, not less than 95%.
( c ) *Uses and restrictions.* Chromium oxide greens is safe for use in coloring externally applied drugs, including those intended for use in the area of eye, in amounts consistent with good manufacturing practice.
( d ) *Labeling.* The color additive and any mixture prepared therefrom intended solely or in part for coloring purposes shall bear, in addition to any information required by law, labeling in accordance with § 70.25 of this chapter.
( e ) *Exemption from certification.* Certification of this color additive is not necessary for the protection of the public health, and therefore batches therof are exempt from certification pursuant to section 721(c) of the act.
[42 FR 36451, July 15, 1977]
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                              EVERGREEN SOLAR INC.

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                                 (IN THOUSANDS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               ------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                  2001          2002          2003          2004          2005
                                               ----------    ----------    ----------    ----------    ----------
<S>                                            <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>
Net loss                                       $ (12,477)    $ (13,199)    $ (14,974)    $ (19,363)    $ (17,316)

  Fixed charges:
    Interest portion of operating lease (A)          206           159           162           210           223
    Debt interest                                      -             -             -            74         2,526
                                               ---------     ---------     ---------     ---------     ---------
  Total fixed charges                                206           159           162           284         2,749
                                               =========     =========     =========     ==========    =========

Net loss less fixed charges                      (12,271)      (13,040)      (14,812)      (19,079)      (14,567)
                                               =========     =========     =========     =========     =========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                      (B)           (B)           (B)           (B)           (B)
                                               =========     =========     =========     =========     =========

Supplemental information:
  Additional earnings required to achieve 1:1
    ratio of earnings to fixed charges         $ (12,477)    $ (13,199)    $ (14,974)    $ (19,363)    $ (17,316)
                                               =========     =========     =========     =========     =========
</TABLE>

(A)   Represents an approximate interest factor of 1/3 of operating rentals

(B)   Earnings are inadequate to cover fixed charges; additional earnings
      required presented as supplemental information in the above table
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Central Wireless, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in
      the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant
      to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


Date:
                January 23, 2007
            By:
            /s/ *Kenneth
              W. Brand*Kenneth
                W. Brand
              Chief
                Executive Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Central Wireless, Inc. and will be retained
      by Central Wireless, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6734

WARREN BANKS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, 

District Judge. (1:10-cv-00186-LMB-IDD)

Submitted: August 26, 2010 Decided: September 3, 2010

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Warren Banks, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Warren Banks seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006)

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record 

and conclude that Banks has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 
3

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
# C_2015228EN.01002702.xml

| 13.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/27

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Single Judge) of 3 June 2015 — Bedin v Commission

(Case F-128/14) (1)

1

((Civil Service - Officials - Disciplinary procedure - Disciplinary action - Respective roles and powers of the Disciplinary Board and the Appointing Authority - Assessment of whether the facts complained of are established))

(2015/C 228/40)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Luc Bedin (Watermael-Bisfort, Belgium) (represented by: L. Vogel, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and C.Ehrbar, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the Appointing Authority’s decision to impose on the applicant the disciplinary penalty of deferment of advancement to a higher step for a 12-month period.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Bedin to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Bedin to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 34, 2.2.2015, p 51.

1

---
-80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

06/27

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 27 Jun 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.41 N 76.30 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★

■ ■ ■ ■

★

●

●

●

●

★

● ● ●

●
IV ED 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

DeC 1 9 2014 

HFARING DOCKET 

) 

In the Matter of Arctic Air Alaska, Inc. ) FDMS No. FAA2014-0316 

) FAA Case No. 2012WP910268 ____________________________ ) 

Judge Richard C. Goodwin 

MOTION TO COMPEL 

Pursuant to, 14 C.P.R.§ 13.220(a) and 13.220(m), the Federal Aviation Administration 

("FAA'') files this motion to compel Respondent's response to the discovery filed in this matter 

and in support thereof states: 

1. On November 6, 2014, the Administrator filed his First Set ofinterrogatories and 

Request for Production of documents. 

2. In accordance with 14 C.P.R. § 13220(d), Respondent was required to respond to the 

request for discovery, including filing objections, no later than 30 days of service of the 

request. 

3. As ofthis date, Respondent as failed to respond to the FAA's discovery request. 

WHEREFORE, the FAA respectfully requests that the ALJ issue an order compelling 

Petitioner's response to the discovery filed by the FAA in the above captioned matter. 
Peter J Lynch 

Assistant Chief Co sel 

n · ingharn 

forcement Division 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

(202) 267-7728 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that the foregoing Agency's Motion to Compel, In the Matter of Arctic Air 

Alaska, Inc., FDMS No. 2014-0316, has been mailed this date by regular and Certified Mail to: 

James I. Hamilton 

President/CEO 

Arctic Air Alaska, Inc. 

3540 University Ave. South 

Fairbanks, AK 99709 

I fUrther certify that the foregoing document has been sent via facsimile and mailed this date by 

Certified Mail to: 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E-11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

The original and a copy was also personally delivered to: 

Hearing Docket (Original and l copy) 

Federal Aviation Administration 

600 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Room 2Wl000-AGC-430 

Washington, DC 20591 

' 

8('k, "'• P,..rr Ft.\, 

December 19,2014
§ 524.2482 Triamcinolone spray. ( a ) *Specifications.* Each milliliter of solution contains 0.15 milligrams triamcinolone acetonide.
( b ) *Sponsor.* See No. 051311 in § 510.600(c) of this chapter.
( c ) *Conditions of use in dogs* — ( 1 ) *Amount.* Apply sufficient pump sprays to uniformly and thoroughly wet the affected areas while avoiding run off of excess product. Administer twice daily for 7 days, then once daily for 7 days, then every other day for an additional 14 days (28 days total).
( 2 ) *Indications for use.* For the control of pruritus associated with allergic dermatitis.
( 3 ) *Limitations.* Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian.
[68 FR 4916, Jan. 31, 2003, as amended at 78 FR 17868, Mar. 25, 2013]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

October 26, 2009 

1019 

Order 

 

October 26, 2009 

138374 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138374 

 COA: 280430 

Wayne CC: 07-006795-01 

COREY JONES, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 20, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

 HATHAWAY, J., not participating. Justice Hathaway recuses herself and will not 

participate in this case as she was the presiding trial court judge. See MCR 2.003(B).
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of CEC  Entertainment,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the  quarter  ended April 3, 2005 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



                                            /s/ Christopher D. Morris
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Christopher D. Morris
                                            Chief Financial Officer
                                            May 12, 2005



A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to CEC  Entertainment,  Inc. and will be retained by CEC Entertainment,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon
request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,299,514
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  262,419
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,112,534
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          733,538
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,378,996
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,112,534
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             21,082,468
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                21,082,468
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



     We hereby consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form S-1/A
of our reports dated May 19, 1999, except for the last paragraph of Note 8 which
is as of June 22, 1999, relating to the financial statements and financial
statement schedules of Vixel Corporation which appear in such Registration
Statement. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading "Experts"
and "Selected Financial Data" in such Prospectus. However, it should be noted
that PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has not prepared or certified "Selected
Financial Data" in such Registration Statement.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

------------------------------------

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Seattle, Washington


August 12, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CELERIS CORPORATION DATED DECEMBER 31, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       7,942,346
<SECURITIES>                                 1,022,847
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,773,678
<ALLOWANCES>                                   343,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,790,518
<PP&E>                                       1,387,964
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,178,482
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,162,252
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        31,196
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,985,034
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,178,482
<SALES>                                      9,252,911
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,252,911
<CGS>                                        6,312,255
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,507,450
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (4,566,794)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (4,566,794)
<DISCONTINUED>                               1,915,099
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,114,602)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.68)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.68)


</TABLE>