alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1District Judge of the Eastern District of Louisiana, sitting

by designation.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-41288

 

In The Matter Of: GEORGE B. MAYO, Individually doing business as

Real Estate Book, doing business as MayDry,

Inc., doing business as Real Estate Source;

CAROLYN MAYO, Individually doing business as

Real Estate Book, doing business as MayDry,

Inc., doing business as Real Estate Source,

Debtors.

_________________________________________________________________

GEORGE B. MAYO, Individually doing business as Real Estate Book,

doing business as MayDry, Inc., doing business as Real Estate

Source; CAROLYN MAYO, Individually doing business as Real Estate

Book, doing business as MayDry, Inc., doing business as Real

Estate Source; MAYO, BULLARD & ASSOCIATES, a Texas Partnership;

ROBIN BULLARD,

Appellees,

versus

NETWORK PUBLICATIONS, INC.,

Appellants.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(M-99-CV-317)

 

October 15, 2001

Before BARKSDALE and STEWART, Circuit Judges, and DUVAL, District

Judge1. 
2Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

2

PER CURIAM:2

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a), we have jurisdiction over

this appeal. We agree with the district court that this matter

must be remanded to the bankruptcy court for further consideration

in the light of the district court’s 13 July 2000 ruling.

Therefore, this case is remanded to the district court for

further remand to the bankruptcy court.

REMANDED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> 
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
FMC Gold Company Form 10Q For The Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 1995
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                           SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                                 82,030
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           1,751
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                            14,684
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      100,259
<PP&E>                                                320,727
<DEPRECIATION>                                        203,020
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        223,749
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  22,223
<BONDS>                                                     0
<COMMON>                                                  735
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                            190,117
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          223,749
<SALES>                                                33,230
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       33,230
<CGS>                                                  33,501
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          33,501
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        9,312
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (9,081)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          (3,811)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (5,270)
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                          (5,270)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (0.07)
        


</TABLE>
DEP Home About DEP Programs Contact Site Map Search

Programs

Water Home

Assessment

Beaches

Drinking

Water

Everglades

Restoration

Grants &

Loans

Ground

Water

Mining &

Minerals

Monitoring

Restoration

Springs

Standards &

Assessment

Stormwater

TMDLs

Underground

Injection

Wastewater

Water Policy

Watersheds

Wetlands

Information

Forms &

Applications

Rules

Permits

Contacts

Data

Publications

Public

Notices

Navigation

Sitemap

Documents are

Adobe Acrobat files,

which will open in a

new window, unless

indicated, and

require the free

Reader Software.

Wastewater

Wastewater Facility Information

The Department uses a number of systems to manage and track basic wastewater facility and permitting information as well as compliance and

enforcement information. For more information on wastewater facilities in Florida, you may wish to view the following links:

• Permit Applications Under Review

• Domestic Wastewater Facts and Statistics

Wastewater Facility Lists - Standard Database Retrievals

These files are in Excel Worksheets sorted by county and facility name from the Wastewater Facility Regulation (WAFR) database. Files are

updated monthly. (Last updated 01/05/2012.)

Important Note: Please choose "anonymous" login if you are prompted for a username/password when selecting a file for

download. Also, below is a Word Document of the wastewater facilities codes that are used on the spreadsheets.

• Domestic Wastewater Facilities (~2.8 MB)

• Industrial Wastewater Facilities (~1.5 MB)

• NPDES Facilities (both Domestic and Industrial) (~1.1 MB)

• NPDES Stormwater Facilities (~25.6 MB)

• Codes List - Wastewater Facilities Codes List (MSWord format)

Florida's Major NPDES Permits

Many wastewater facilities in Florida are also subject to federal National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements

administered by the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Copies of NPDES permits and fact sheets for major facilities issued after

November 1, 2002, may be viewed at the following EPA website.

EPA’s View Individual and General Permits

Please note that for Domestic Wastewater Facilities, you must select the permit category "Electric, Gas and Sanitary Services"

from the drop-down menu.

•

Back to Wastewater | Compliance | Domestic | Industrial Homepages

Last updated: January 05, 2012

2600 Blair Stone Road M.S. 3500 Tallahassee, Florida 32399 850-245-8336 (phone) / 850-245-8356 (fax) 

DEP Home | About DEP | Contact Us | Search | Site Map

Florida FDEP Wastewater Facility Information Page 1 of 1

file://M:\Project\Nutrients - OST\4 - FL Estuary Criteria\15 - Economic Analysis\Econ Ref... 1/18/2012
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ERNESTO ZARAGOSA-SOLIS, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

M. GUTIERREZ, Warden; CHRISTENSEN, 

Lt.; FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; C. 

NEWLAND, physician assistant; K. 

MORAN, SIS Technician, 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 23-15306 

D.C. No. 4:22-cv-00562-JCH 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

John Charles Hinderaker, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 15, 2023**

Before: TASHIMA, S.R. THOMAS, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Federal prisoner Ernesto Zaragosa-Solis appeals pro se from the district 

court’s order denying his motions for a preliminary injunction in his action 

alleging various federal claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

AUG 22 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 23-15306 

§ 1292(a)(1). We review de novo questions of our own jurisdiction, Hunt v. 

Imperial Merchant Servs., Inc., 560 F.3d 1137, 1140 (9th Cir. 2009), and we 

dismiss this appeal as moot.

Zaragosa-Solis’s appeal is moot because, during the pendency of this appeal, 

Zaragosa-Solis amended the complaint that formed the basis of the appeal. See 

Falck N. Cal. Corp. v. Scott Griffith Collaborative Sols., LLC, 25 F.4th 763, 765-

66 (9th Cir. 2022) (holding that the amendment of a complaint on which an 

interlocutory appeal is based moots the appeal, even if the amended complaint is 

“substantively the same,” because the prior complaint becomes “a legal nullity”); 

Akina v. Hawaii, 835 F.3d 1003, 1010 (9th Cir. 2016) (“An interlocutory appeal of 

the denial of a preliminary injunction is moot when a court can no longer grant any 

effective relief sought in the injunction request.”); ACF Indus. Inc. v. Cal. State Bd. 

of Equalization, 42 F.3d 1286, 1292 (9th Cir. 1994) (dismissing as moot certain 

claims on appeal from the denial of a preliminary injunction because the claims 

were dismissed before the district court while the appeal was pending).

In light of our disposition, we do not consider Zaragosa-Solis’s contentions 

regarding the merits of the appeal. 

All pending motions are denied as moot.

DISMISSED.
# C_2018392EN.01001701.xml

| 29.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 392/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 392/17

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2018 — Vnesheconombank v Council

(Case T-737/14) (1)

((Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine - Applicant’s name included in the list of entities to which the restrictive measures apply - Obligation to state reasons - Manifest error of assessment - Right to effective judicial protection - Misuse of powers - Right to property - Freedom to conduct a business - Equal treatment))

(2018/C 392/20)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Bank for Development and Foreign Economic Affairs (Vnesheconombank) (Moscow, Russia) (represented by: J. M. Viñals Camallonga, J.L. Iriarte Ángel and L. Barriola Urruticoechea, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: initially A. de Elera-San Miguel Hurtado and G. Étienne, and subsequently F. Florindo Gijón, P. Mahnič Bruni and H. Marcos Fraile, Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre, D. Gauci and S. Pardo Quintillán, Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment in part of Council Decision 2014/512/CFSP of 31 July 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2014 L 229, p. 13), as amended by Council Decision 2014/659/CFSP of 8 September 2014, amending Decision 2014/512 (OJ 2014 L 271, p. 54), and of Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 of 31 July 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2014 L 229, p. 1), as amended by Council Regulation (EU) No 960/2014 of 8 September 2014, amending Regulation No 833/2014 (OJ 2014 L 271, p. 3), in so far as those acts concern the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Bank for Development and Foreign Economic Affairs (Vnesheconombank) to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union in these proceedings and in the interlocutory proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Bank for Development and Foreign Economic Affairs (Vnesheconombank) to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union in these proceedings and in the interlocutory proceedings;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 7, 12.1.2015.

---
# C_2016232EN.01001401.xml

| 27.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 232/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 232/14

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 May 2016 — Chung-Yuan Chang v EUIPO — BSH Hausgeräte (AROMA)

(Case T-749/14) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - International registration designating the European Union — Word mark AROMA - Absolute grounds for refusal - Descriptive character - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2016/C 232/17)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Peter Chung-Yuan Chang (San Diego, California, United States) (represented by: A. Sanz-Bermell y Martínez, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by A. Crawcour and A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: BSH Hausgeräte GmbH, formerly BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: S. Biagosh, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 September 2014 (Case R 1887/2013-4), relating to invalidity proceedings between Peter Chung-Yuan Chang and BSH Hausgeräte.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 4 September 2014 (Case R 1887/2013-4); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 4 September 2014 (Case R 1887/2013-4);

| 2. | Orders EUIPO and BSH Hausgeräte GmbH to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by Mr Peter Chung-Yuan Chang. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EUIPO and BSH Hausgeräte GmbH to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by Mr Peter Chung-Yuan Chang.

---

(1)  OJ C 16, 19.1.2015.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7508 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.7508

                     One Hundred Eighteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
         the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-four

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 1285 Emancipation Highway in Fredericksburg, Virginia, as the ``Gladys 
                         P. Todd Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. GLADYS P. TODD POST OFFICE.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1285 Emancipation Highway in Fredericksburg, Virginia, shall 
be known and designated as the ``Gladys P. Todd Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Gladys P. 
Todd Post Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                              
<ARTICLE>                          5
<LEGEND>                        
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Partnership's  audited  financial  statements for the quarter ended December 31,
1996 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>                       
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000
                                    
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                       DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                  4,195
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                              38
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        4,276
<PP&E>                                 32,703
<DEPRECIATION>                          3,811
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         33,325
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   8,484
<BONDS>                                 3,546
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                             21,295
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           33,325
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        1,928
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           1,109
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          188
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        901
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (270)
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (270)
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                            (270)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          (5.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                          (5.29)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2015007EN.01005002.xml

| 12.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/50

---

Action brought on 6 October 2014 — ZZ v OHIM

(Case F-101/14)

(2015/C 007/60)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: Heinrich Tettenborn, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM)

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Action for annulment of the defendant’s decision to apply to the competitions OHIM/AD/01/13 and OHIM/AST/02/13 the clause contained in the applicant’s contract of employment, which provides for the termination of the applicant’s contract of employment in the event that she is not included in the reserve list of the next open competition organised by EPSO for her function group with the specialisation ‘industrial property’, and claim for compensation in respect of the non-material damage caused to her.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul OHIM’s decision, of which the applicant was informed by OHIM’s letter of 28 November 2003, to apply to competitions OHIM/AD/01/13 and OHIM/AST/02/13, the notices for which were published on 31 October 2013, the clause contained in Article 5 of the applicant’s contract of employment, which provides for the termination of the applicant’s contract of employment in the event that she is not included in the reserve list of the next open competition organised by EPSO for her function group with the specialisation ‘industrial property’; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul OHIM’s decision, of which the applicant was informed by OHIM’s letter of 28 November 2003, to apply to competitions OHIM/AD/01/13 and OHIM/AST/02/13, the notices for which were published on 31 October 2013, the clause contained in Article 5 of the applicant’s contract of employment, which provides for the termination of the applicant’s contract of employment in the event that she is not included in the reserve list of the next open competition organised by EPSO for her function group with the specialisation ‘industrial property’;

| — | Order OHIM to pay the applicant compensation of an appropriate amount, to be left to the discretion of the Court, in respect of the non-material damage caused to her by the decision of OHIM referred to in the first head of claim, and |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the applicant compensation of an appropriate amount, to be left to the discretion of the Court, in respect of the non-material damage caused to her by the decision of OHIM referred to in the first head of claim, and

| — | Order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the costs.

---
§ 582.5223 Calcium pyrophosphate. ( a ) *Product.* Calcium pyrophosphate.
( b ) *Conditions of use.* This substance is generally recognized as safe when used in accordance with good manufacturing or feeding practice.
§ 1311.30 Requirements for storing and using a private key for digitally signing orders. ( a ) Only the certificate holder may access or use his or her digital certificate and private key.
( b ) The certificate holder must provide FIPS-approved secure storage for the private key, as discussed by FIPS 140-2, 180-2, 186-2, and accompanying change notices and annexes, as incorporated by reference in § 1311.08.
( c ) A certificate holder must ensure that no one else uses the private key. While the private key is activated, the certificate holder must prevent unauthorized use of that private key.
( d ) A certificate holder must not make back-up copies of the private key.
( e ) The certificate holder must report the loss, theft, or compromise of the private key or the password, via a revocation request, to the Certification Authority within 24 hours of substantiation of the loss, theft, or compromise. Upon receipt and verification of a signed revocation request, the Certification Authority will revoke the certificate. The certificate holder must apply for a new certificate under the requirements of § 1311.25.
§ 582.3109 Thiodipropionic acid. ( a ) *Product.* Thiodipropionic acid.
( b ) *Tolerance.* This substance is generally recognized as safe for use in food when the total content of antioxidants is not over 0.02 percent of fat or oil content including essential (volatile) oil content of the food, provided the substance is used in accordance with good manufacturing or feeding practice.
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/gpo120971 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.