alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 556.180 Dichlorvos. ( a ) [Reserved]
( b ) *Tolerances.* The tolerance for dichlorvos is: ( 1 ) *Swine.* Edible tissues: 0.1 ppm.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
( c ) *Related conditions of use.* See §§ 520.596 and 558.198 of this chapter.
[84 FR 32993, July 11, 2019, as amended at 86 FR 13188, Mar. 8, 2021]
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Series of Studies on Employment of Women in Various Defense Industries

              																								United States. Women's Bureau.						"Employment of Women in the Machine-Tool Industry, 1942 : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 192-4" in *Series of Studies on Employment of Women in Various Defense Industries : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 192*			(1943).						https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5465/item/539656, accessed on September 25, 2024.	    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
# C_2015034EN.01001501.xml

| 2.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 34/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 34/15

---

Action brought on 26 November 2014 — European Commission v Republic of Finland

(Case C-538/14)

(2015/C 034/17)

Language of the case: Finnish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: I. Koskinen and D. Martin, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Finland

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by failing to designate a body with competence to perform, in the field of working life, the tasks required by Article 13 of Council Directive 2000/43/EC of 29 June 2000 implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin (1), and by failing to ensure that those tasks are actually performed, the Republic of Finland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 3(1) and 13 of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to designate a body with competence to perform, in the field of working life, the tasks required by Article 13 of Council Directive 2000/43/EC of 29 June 2000 implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin (1), and by failing to ensure that those tasks are actually performed, the Republic of Finland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 3(1) and 13 of that directive;

1

| — | order the Republic of Finland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Republic of Finland to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Under Article 3(1) of Directive 2000/43/EC, the scope of the directive includes working life. Under Article 13 of Directive 2000/43/EC Member States are to designate a body or bodies for the promotion of equal treatment of all persons without discrimination on the grounds of racial or ethnic origin, and to ensure that the competences of at least one of the nominated bodies extend, as regards the matters and tasks laid down in that article, to action in questions concerning working life. Since no body is designated in Finnish legislation to carry out the tasks laid down in Article 13 of Directive 2000/43/EC in questions of working life, the Republic of Finland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 3(1) and 13 of that directive.

---

(1)  OJ 2000 L 180, p. 22.

1

---
From: Tim Pivetz, Battelle

To: Cindy Wheeler, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

Date: April 20, 2010

Subject: Hard to Clean Fl oors from EPA Dust Study

During the EPA Dust Study conducted in fall 2006, th e study protocol requi red cleaning of floors and window sills in study rooms to below EPA clearance standards prior to the start of each experiment. The study protocol stated that following pre-experi ment cleaning and collection of dust wipes by an independent licensed clearance t echnician “if the lead loading on the clearance wipes was no greater than 40 μ g/ft 2 on floors and 250 μ g/ft 2 on window sills, the unit was declared clean. If one or more samples failed to meet these clearance standards, then the room in which that sample was collected was re-cleaned and re-sampled.” (p. 3-4, 11-14-07 Final Report) The pre-experiment cleanings were conducted by trained and experienced lead abatement workers or abatement cleaning specialists.

In some housing units, floors and window sills in poor condition were difficult to clean resulting in dust wipes that returned m easurements below clearance standards. For example, Housing

Unit H09, which was utilized for a total of ten in terior experiments, required multiple cleanings before four of those experiments (with the othe r experiments requiring only a single cleaning). There were four cases of a room needing two clean ings to get all floor dust wipe measurements below 40 μg/ft 2 , and another case of three cleanings being required to clear a room. (Multiple rooms required re-cleaning once.) H09 had wood floors in poor conditio n (e.g., with significant gaps between the boards), and it was feared that despite repeated re-cle anings clearance would

continue to be difficult to achieve.

Because the clearance failures and re-cleanings were delaying the start of experiments and hampering the progress of the study, study management made the decision to coat the work room floor with polyurethane following the initial cl eaning and prior to the clearance wipes being obtained. After some experience was gained, it wa s determined that the best product to use for purposes of the study was a quick-drying sealan t manufactured by Parks called ProFinisher Universal Sealer Fast Drying Formula, Profe ssional Grade, which was purchased at Home Depot. This product dried in as little as 45 mi nutes, which allowed the clearance technician to obtain wipe samples and submit them for an alysis on the same day as the cleaning.

Following the decision to coat floors with the sealan t prior to clearance tes ting, there were little

to no further clearance failures.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7526 

To repeal the final rule adopted by the District of Columbia Department 

of Energy and Environment relating to ‘‘Adoption of California Vehicle 

Emission Standards’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 5, 2024 

Mrs. LUNA (for herself, Mr. DONALDS, Mr. LANGWORTHY, Mrs. LESKO, and 

Mr. BIGGS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To repeal the final rule adopted by the District of Columbia 

Department of Energy and Environment relating to 

‘‘Adoption of California Vehicle Emission Standards’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘D. C. Consumer Vehi5 cle Choice Protection Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF RULE ON ADOPTION OF CALIFORNIA 

7 VEHICLE EMISSION STANDARDS. 

8 Effective as of December 29, 2023, the final rule 

9 adopted by the District of Columbia Department of EnVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:48 Mar 06, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H7526.IH H7526

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7526 IH

1 ergy and Environment relating to ‘‘Adoption of California 

2 Vehicle Emission Standards’’ (published at 70 District of 

3 Columbia Register 016673) is repealed, and any regula4 tion amended or repealed by such rule is restored or re5 vived as if such rule had not been adopted. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
# C_2014462EN.01001602.xml

| 22.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 462/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 462/16

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Wien (Austria) lodged on 15 October 2014 — Seattle Genetics Inc.

(Case C-471/14)

(2014/C 462/26)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Oberlandesgericht Wien

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Seattle Genetics Inc.

Applicant:

Defendant authority: Österreichisches Patentamt

Defendant authority:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Is the date of the first authorisation to place the product on the market in the Community pursuant to Article 13(1) of Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 concerning the supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products determined according to Community law or does that provision refer to the date on which the authorisation takes effect under the law of the Member State in question? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is the date of the first authorisation to place the product on the market in the Community pursuant to Article 13(1) of Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 concerning the supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products determined according to Community law or does that provision refer to the date on which the authorisation takes effect under the law of the Member State in question?

1

| 2. | If the Court’s answer is that the date referred to in Question 1 is determined by Community law, which date must be taken into account — the date of authorisation or the date of notification? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the Court’s answer is that the date referred to in Question 1 is determined by Community law, which date must be taken into account — the date of authorisation or the date of notification?

---

(1)  OJ 2009 L 152, p. 1.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          50,272
<SECURITIES>                                   187,180
<RECEIVABLES>                                   74,627
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (9,853)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               218,145
<PP&E>                                         173,582
<DEPRECIATION>                                (77,907)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 638,936
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          192,778
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           765
<OTHER-SE>                                     241,982
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   638,936
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               125,962
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   85,942
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,027
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,122
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 36,592
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,342
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             22,250
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,250
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .35
        

</TABLE>
#### § 601.95 Termination of requirements.

If FDA determines after approval under this subpart that the requirements established in §§ 601.91(b)(2), 601.92, and 601.93 are no longer necessary for the safe and effective use of a biological product, FDA will so notify the applicant. Ordinarily, for biological products approved under § 601.91, these requirements will no longer apply when FDA determines that the postmarketing study verifies and describes the biological product's clinical benefit. For biological products approved under § 601.91, the restrictions would no longer apply when FDA determines that safe use of the biological product can be ensured through appropriate labeling. FDA also retains the discretion to remove specific postapproval requirements upon review of a petition submitted by the sponsor in accordance with § 10.30 of this chapter.
# C_2015398EN.01007801.xml

| 30.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 398/78 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 398/78

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 21 October 2015 — AQ v Commission

(Case F-57/14) (1)

1

((Civil Service - Officials - Regulation No 45/2001 - Processing of personal data acquired for private purposes - Administrative enquiry - Disciplinary procedure - Rights of the defence - Duty to state reasons - Disciplinary penalty - Proportionality))

(2015/C 398/92)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: AQ (represented initially by: L. Massaux, lawyer, and subsequently by: H. Mignard, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and C. Ehrbar, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application to annul the decision to impose a disciplinary penalty consisting of a reprimand following a disciplinary enquiry and application for damages

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders AQ to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders AQ to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 421, 24.11.2014, p. 60.

1

---
# C_2016222EN.01004803.xml

| 20.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/48

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 2 May 2016 — Schmidt v Commission

(Case F-40/14) (1)

(2016/C 222/72)

Language of the case: French

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 292, 1/9/2014, p. 60.

---
### s Terri Zick to: Christopher Lambesis Cc: Jake Gadd
From: Terri Zick <tzick©cticompanies.com > To: Christopher Lambesis/R5/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Jake Gadd <jakegadd©owossographic.com > 06/08/2009 01:55 PM

••,••••,-•••• ■ •-•••••••,•,,•,

### ChristopherAs a follow up to the voice mail message that I left you last week, I would like to discuss the status of the Owosso Graphic Arts petition. You had indicated in a previous phone message to me that there are some issues involving the change in developer process that you would like to discuss. As described in our March 31, 2009 correspondence (attached), the process change provides superior segregation of the development process from the etching process than was achieved with the aqueous developer (and TCE before that). As described in the attached letter, the developer is rinsed from the plate, and the plate heated over an open flame prior to entering the etching process. The two parts of the process are now effectively isolated from one another, which should further limit the chance of any of the developer being contributed to the filter cake. Please give me a call or e-mail at your next available time so that we may resolve this remaining issue. Thank you Terri Zick 313-300-7401 cell 248-486-5090 x232 office tzick@cticompanies.com

The information contained in this electronic message is privileged and/or confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of the communication is neither allowed nor intended. If you have received this commutzick@cticompanies.comase immediately notify us by return e-mail or by calling 8jakegadd@owossographic.come message. Thank You!
<PAGE> 1
Exhibit 3.02
                                                               959425
                                                             UTAH DIV OF
                                                          CORPORATIONS & UCC

                AMENDMENTS TO THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                    OF
                         DRYDEN INDUSTRIES, INC.

Pursuant to the provisions of Section 16-10a-1001 et. seq. of the Utah Revised
Corporation Act, the undersigned, hereinafter referred to as the
"Corporation," hereby adopts the following Amendments to the Articles of
Incorporation:

FIRST: The name of the Corporation is:  DRYDEN INDUSTRIES, INC.

SECOND: The following Amendments to the Articles of Incorporation were duly
adopted by the board of directors and the shareholders of the corporation in
accordance with Section 16-10a-1003 of the Utah Revised Business Corporation
Act, at a Special Meeting of Shareholders held on January 27, 2000.

                                 ARTICLE I
                                   NAME

The name of the Corporation shall be: e resources inc.



The number of issued and outstanding shares entitled to vote on these
Amendments to the Articles of Incorporation was 124,562,588 of which number
70,000,000 shares voted in favor and none opposed.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the foregoing Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation
have been executed this 27th day of January, 2000.

                                       DRYDEN INDUSTRIES, INC.

                                       /S/R. Lee Matzig, President
# L_2018282EN.01000301.xml

| 12.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 282/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 282/3

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2018/1693

of 5 November 2018

conferring protection under Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the name ‘Vijlen’ (PDO)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (1), and in particular Article 99 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | In accordance with Article 97(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the Commission has examined the application to register the name ‘Vijlen’ sent by the Netherlands and has published it in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

In accordance with Article 97(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the Commission has examined the application to register the name ‘Vijlen’ sent by the Netherlands and has published it in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | No statement of objection has been received by the Commission under Article 98 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

No statement of objection has been received by the Commission under Article 98 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.

| (3) | In accordance with Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the name ‘Vijlen’ should be protected and entered in the register referred to in Article 104 of that Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

In accordance with Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the name ‘Vijlen’ should be protected and entered in the register referred to in Article 104 of that Regulation.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Vijlen’ (PDO) is hereby protected.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 5 November 2018.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 203, 13.6.2018, p. 2.

2

---
EXHIBIT 32
----------




                             CERTIFICATIONS OF
            CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                    PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                        SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
            ---------------------------------------------------



      The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be
deemed filed pursuant to any provision of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 or any other securities law:

      Each of the undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on
Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of ALP Liquidating Trust.




                                          /s/   Gary Nickele
                                          ------------------------------
                                          Gary Nickele
                                          Chief Executive Officer




                                          /s/   Gailen J. Hull
                                          ------------------------------
                                          Gailen J. Hull
                                          Chief Financial Officer and
                                          Principal Accounting Officer