A Summary of Activities,

Accomplishments and

Hispanic Education Attainment:

2001–08

White House Initiative on 

Educational Excellence for Hispanic Americans
A Summary of Activities, 

Accomplishments and 

Hispanic Education Attainment: 2001–08

Prepared by:

White House Initiative on Educational Excellence for Hispanic Americans 

2008

White House Initiative on 

Educational Excellence for Hispanic Americans
The content of this report does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the U.S. Department of Education, nor does the mention of trade names, commercial products or organizations imply endorsements by 

the U.S. Government. This publication also contains URLs for information created and maintained by private 

organizations. This information is provided for the reader’s convenience. The U.S. Department of Education 

is not responsible for controlling or guaranteeing the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of 

this outside information. Further, the inclusion of information or URL does not reflect the importance of the 

organization, nor is it intended to endorse any views expressed, or products or services offered.

U.S. Department of Education

Margaret Spellings

Secretary

White House Initiative on Educational Excellence for Hispanic Americans

Adam Chavarria

Executive Director

September 2008

This report is in the public domain. Authorization to reproduce it in whole or in part is granted. While permission to reprint this publication is not necessary, the citation should be: U.S. Department of Education, White 

House Initiative on Educational Excellence for Hispanic Americans, A Summary of Activities, Accomplishments and Hispanic Education Attainment: 2001–08, Washington, D.C., 2008.

To obtain copies of this report,

write to: ED Pubs, Education Publications Center, U. S. Department of Education, 

P. O. Box 1398, Jessup, MD, 20794-1398; or

fax your request to: 301-470-1244; or

e-mail your request to: edpubs@inet.ed.gov; or

call in your request toll-free to: 1-877- 433-7827 (1-877-4-ED-PUBS). If 877 service is not yet available in 

your area, call 1-800-872-5327 (1-800-USA-LEARN). Those who use a telecommunications device for the 

deaf (TDD) or a teletypewriter (TTY) should call 1-877- 576-7734; or 

order online at: http://edpubs.ed.gov.

This report is available on the White House Initiative Web site at: http://www.yesican.gov. 

On request, this publication is available in alternative formats, such as Braille, large print, audiotape or computer diskette. For more information, contact the Department’s Alternate Format Center at 202-260-0852 

or 202-260-0818. 
iii

Contents

List of Figures ..................................................................................................................iv

Letter From the President of the United States ................................................................v

Letter From the U.S. Secretary of Education .................................................................. vii

Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................... ix

Foreword ........................................................................................................... ..............xi

Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1

White House Initiative Activities and Accomplishments: 2001–08

Partners in Hispanic Education ............................................................................. .......... 5

The Partnership for Hispanic Family Learning ................................................................ 9

Hispanic Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Education ........13

The Role of the Federal Government in Hispanic Education Attainment ....................... 21

Stakeholders and Assets in the Community ...................................................................25

Channels of Communication............................................................................................33

Education Reform and Hispanic Education Attainment ................................................. 41

Conclusion ..................................................................................................................... ..... 57

Bibliography.......................................................................................................................... 59

Appendixes

Appendix A: Executive Order 13230 ...............................................................................65

Appendix B: President’s Advisory Commission on Educational Excellence 

for Hispanic Americans . ........................................................................................... 69

Appendix C: Member Organizations of the Partnership for Hispanic 

Family Learning ........................................................................................................ 71

Appendix D: Title V—Developing Hispanic-Serving Institutions Program.................... 77

Appendix E: Highlights from Foundations for Success: The Final Report of the

National Mathematics Panel ................................................................... ... 79

White House Initiative Staff.............................................................................. 81
iv

Figures

1. Percentage distribution of White House Initiative partner organizations, by type

 of organization: 2001–08 ........................................................................................... 10

2. National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) trends in mathematics scale 

 scores and score gaps for white, black and Hispanic students age 9: 1978–2004 ... 42 

3. NAEP trends in reading scale scores and score gaps for white, black and Hispanic

 students age 9: 1975–2004 ....................................................................................... 44

4. NAEP trends in mathematics scale scores and score gaps for white, Hispanic

 and English Language Learners (ELL) eighth-graders attending Massachusetts

 schools: 2000–07 ...................................................................................................... 45

5. NAEP tends in reading scale scores and score gaps for white, Hispanic and

 ELL fourth-graders attending Florida schools: 1998–2007 ........................................ 46

6. NAEP trends in mathematics scale scores and score gaps for white, Hispanic and

 ELL fourth-graders attending Texas schools: 2000–07 ............................................. 47

A-1. Percentage distribution of Hispanic-Serving Institutions, by state: 2007 ............... 78

A-2. Title V funding amounts (in millions) for Hispanic-Serving Institutions, by

 funding year: 1999–2007 ........................................................................................ 78
v
vi
vii

vii

THE SECRETARY OF EDUCATION 

 Washington, DC 20202 

July 2, 2008 

Six years ago, the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) changed education in this nation. This law, 

passed with bipartisan support, highlighted the idea that every child can learn and every school 

must be accountable for helping students achieve. 

The law’s core principles now guide our conversation on education. These include: annual 

assessments; disaggregating data to make sure we focus on all students, including poor students, 

minorities, and those with disabilities; timely information and options for parents; highly 

qualified teachers; and better use of resources. These principles will enable us to achieve the goal 

of all students performing on grade level or above by 2014. 

The Nation’s Report Card, or NAEP, continues to show that NCLB is working. Student 

achievement is rising while the achievement gap is beginning to close. For example, the 

percentage of eighth-grade Hispanic students with fundamental reading skills rose from 56 

percent in 2005 to 58 percent in 2007. Since 2003, the achievement gap in eighth-grade math 

between white and Hispanic and white and African-American students narrowed by three points 

while all three groups made significant gains. 

The success of NCLB relies on support from many corners, including from businesses of all 

sizes, community leaders and civic organizations, and we continue to see their positive impact on 

the Hispanic community. They disseminate critical education information to families, encourage 

greater parental involvement, and help Hispanic children reach their potential and achieve 

dreams. Many of these organizations have partnered with the White House Initiative on 

Educational Excellence for Hispanic Americans, and some of their important work is described 

in this report. 

We have seen great academic progress among Hispanics and students of all backgrounds in the 

past six years, but challenges remain. Now that data is showing us we need to improve, we must 

work together to strengthen NCLB and keep the movement going forward. 

I look forward to continued cooperation to equip every student with a quality education and 

leave behind a legacy of which we can all be proud. 

Margaret Spellings 
viii
ix

Acknowledgments

The White House Initiative on Educational Excellence for Hispanic Americans acknowledges Secretary Margaret Spellings for her leadership in advancing the activities and accomplishments outlined in this report. In addition, this office appreciates the assistance, guidance and cooperation 

provided by Anne Dudro, chief of staff, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education; Norma S. 

Garza, executive director, National Board of Education Sciences, Institute of Education Sciences; 

Romanita Matta-Barrera, former deputy director, White House Initiative, and director of Hispanic 

outreach, Office of Communications and Outreach (OCO); Diana Perez, former deputy director, 

White House Initiative, and chief of staff, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development 

(OPEPD); Linda Bugg, program analyst, OCO; Faye Lone, education specialist, Office of Indian Education; and Susan Thompson-Hoffman and Susan Aud, OPEPD, in support of this office’s efforts to 

provide a timely and detailed report.

The White House Initiative also recognizes the following individuals—past staff, fellows, interns 

and those specially assigned to this office: 

Staff

Leslie Sanchez, 

former executive director

David Almacy

Desiree Avila

Virgie R. Barnes

Webber Barton

Lyndsay Cruz

Blanca Esparza

Brent Gilmore

Mary Ann Gomez

Catherine Horsman

Marjon Kamrani

Monica Kibler

Syddia Lee-Chee

Denise Rodriguez-

 Lopez

Erica Romero

Sophia Stampley

Richard Toscano

Special Assignments

Carmen Cantor

Steve Finch

Theresa Grant

Fellows

Jason P. Casellas

Julissa Cruz

Crystal Martinez

Sulema Medrano

Krystal S. Reyes

Annette Rodriguez

Heidy Servin-Baez

Eduardo Tobias

Martin Torres

Edgar Zazueta

Interns

Cecilia Rios Aguilar

Gladys Alvarez

Gabriel Arana

Elizabeth Ehly

Heather Epler

Rosa Jimenez

Sarah Koenig

Hillary Maxwell

Terez McCall

Monique Mendoza

Ruben Mora

Benjamín Muñoz

Katherine Oldham

Keith Ornelas

Patricio Prieto

Jaqueline Rivera

Erin Ross

Ana Sierra

Megan Strandell
x
xi

Foreword

This report represents the culmination of the activities conducted by the White House Initiative on 

Educational Excellence for Hispanic Americans (White House Initiative) over the span of seven 

years, as of this writing. It also encompasses the work of the President’s Advisory Commission 

on Educational Excellence for Hispanic Americans (the commission), as well as its recommendations and their implementation.

Since its establishment by President George W. Bush in 2001, the commission undertook the task 

of prescribing ways to close the academic achievement gap that had persisted for decades between Hispanic American students and their non-Hispanic peers. The initial phase of its work examined the state of knowledge about Hispanic education attainment, including the latest research 

about early childhood development, early reading and the demographic shifts of the Hispanic 

population in the U.S. The commission also examined the available data on Hispanic education 

attainment in unprecedented ways (e.g., disaggregating data on education attainment so as to 

examine the differences in education attainment between foreign-born and native-born Hispanic 

students as well as the differences in the education attainment of various Hispanic subgroups). 

In the process, it dispelled any notion that the education status of all Hispanic students fits into a 

single pattern. 

President Bush’s blueprint for education reform—the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB)—

guided the commission’s most enduring work in crafting its recommendations. Several of the 

recommendations that followed were structured around fulfilling the promise of this landmark legislation. Together, the recommendations and NCLB addressed education reform improvements 

for areas ranging from early childhood to postsecondary education and the methods by which the 

education attainment of Hispanic Americans could be enhanced. The responsibility for translating 

these recommendations into practice fell squarely on the shoulders of the staff of the White House 

Initiative on Educational Excellence for Hispanic Americans. This report highlights several of the 

activities the White House Initiative implemented to fulfill those recommendations. 

Among the many activities performed by the office was the launch of a program in 2003 intended 

to assess and address the need for practical information about education options and opportunities for Hispanic Americans. This program confirmed that although there is a wealth of existing 

education information, a knowledge gap existed among Latino parents and families with regard 

to the information available to them that would help them make informed decisions about their 

children’s education. As a result, the White House Initiative implemented a national network of 

public-private organizations through which information and resources would be disseminated. In 

addition to this national network, other channels of communication were employed by the White 

House Initiative to facilitate the flow of education information to Hispanic parents, families and 

communities. In doing so, a key commission recommendation was implemented: raising national 

awareness among key stakeholder groups to increase the education attainment of Hispanic 

students.

Other activities pertained to emphasizing academic preparation—particularly in the core subjects 

of mathematics and science—as a way to improve the enrollment of, persistence in and graduation of more Hispanic students from postsecondary institutions. A science, technology, education 

and mathematics (STEM) education initiative for Hispanics emerged as an important outgrowth 
xii

of those efforts. After an initial meeting, a working group comprising representatives of Hispanic 

STEM associations, Hispanic-serving institutions, Hispanic-serving school districts, and corporations began to collaborate on ways to expand awareness, exposure to and enrollment of more 

Hispanic students in the STEM fields. This collaboration has since expanded into plans to convene 

events and forums that address efforts that improve Hispanic STEM education. Coordination of 

federal agency reporting and research in meeting the education needs of Hispanic Americans in 

general, and English Language Learners (ELLs) in particular, comprised additional activities that 

reflected the recommendations of the commission.

The activities and the various collaborative efforts described in this report were implemented to 

support President Bush’s vision for education reform and the commission’s recommendations for 

closing the academic achievement gap for Hispanic students. 

While Hispanic education attainment is improving and achievement gaps are narrowing, more 

work remains to be done, particularly regarding the need to strengthen the academic preparation 

of Hispanic students to ensure that substantially more are graduating from high school and enrolling in and graduating from postsecondary institutions. President Bush and Secretary Margaret 

Spellings have ensured that the education reforms that will complete the remaining work are in 

place. It is, then, incumbent on us all—parents, families, businesses, education institutions, and 

faith-based and community leaders—to do our part to help close the academic achievement gap 

once and for all.

Adam Chavarria

Executive Director
xiii

Executive Summary

President George W. Bush signed Executive Order 13230 on Oct. 12, 2001, creating the President’s Advisory Commission on Educational Excellence for Hispanic Americans, which was 

charged with examining the underlying causes for the low educational attainment of Hispanic 

Americans and recommending ways to close the academic achievement gap.

When the president signed this executive order, the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) had not 

yet been enacted into law. Prior to its enactment by Congress in 2002, the education initiative 

was referred to as the president’s blueprint for education reform, and it held the promise of finally 

transforming the state of Hispanic education. The blueprint became the centerpiece on which 

Executive Order 13230 was crafted and the roadmap that guided the commission’s work over the 

next 18 months. 

The commission’s charge concluded when it issued its final report in March 2003. The commission’s final report and the specific recommendations it contained provided a comprehensive set 

of proposals that governed the activities of the office of the White House Initiative on Educational 

Excellence for Hispanic Americans (White House Initiative).

The commission’s recommendations covered the range of education reform, from early childhood 

development to postsecondary education, and the institutions and stakeholders impacting their 

outcomes. This report provides a chronological summary of the activities the White House Initiative conducted to implement the commission’s recommendations. Because education reform 

was chief among the commission’s recommendations, the report devotes a specific section to 

highlighting the substantive improvement that Hispanic students have made since the passage 

of NCLB.

Partners in Hispanic Education

The first activity the White House Initiative sought to implement in 2003 was Partners in Hispanic 

Education, a collaboration of several national public and private organizations whose purpose 

was to raise awareness about the options and opportunities available to Hispanic families and 

their children under No Child Left Behind and other supportive education programs. Through the 

combined efforts and support of these national organizations, the White House Initiative held 

education fairs, or ferias educativas, in seven cities across the country. While this activity demonstrated the economies that can be attained by partnering with public and private organizations, it 

also revealed the lack of knowledge and awareness that most Hispanic parents and families had 

about the landmark legislation designed to provide them with education choices and options for 

their children.

 President George H. W. Bush issued the first executive order creating a presidential advisory commission on Hispanic 

education on Sept. 24, 1990. In the executive order that followed, President William Clinton also created a similar 

commission on Feb. 22, 1994. In both instances, the commissions served through the end of each respective administration.
xiv

The Partnership for Hispanic Family Learning

To overcome this knowledge gap in the Hispanic community, U.S. Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings helped launch a more comprehensive effort in 2005 to reach more Hispanic parents and families with a wider range of education information in English and Spanish. The effort, 

Partnership for Hispanic Family Learning, significantly expanded the public-private partnership to 

encompass more than 400 organizations—small, medium and large—and utilized the network of 

organizations to disseminate hundreds of thousands of education publications. The Tool Kit for 

Hispanic Families, a product of the U.S. Department of Education, was the most widely distributed 

publication. In addition, three regional conferences were held in connection with the partnership 

in New Mexico, California and Georgia to address a range of education topics from early childhood development and academic preparation to the options and opportunities available under 

NCLB.

Hispanic Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Education

While implementing the Partners in Hispanic Education and the Partnership for Hispanic Family 

Learning, academic preparation—particularly in the core subjects of math and science—evolved 

as an important outgrowth of education reform. This new emphasis was strengthened by the 

president’s announcement of the American Competitiveness Initiative (ACI) and subsequent legislation designed to improve America’s competitiveness in science, technology, engineering and 

mathematics (STEM). The important role that Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSIs) perform in developing Hispanic talent in the STEM fields became the subject of a comprehensive conference 

that the White House Initiative convened in April 2007 at the University of Texas at El Paso. 

This conference was enhanced by the participation of other long-standing Hispanic STEM associations, Hispanic-serving school districts, the College Board, and the National Math-Science 

Initiative, among others. Since then, the White House Initiative has advanced Hispanic STEM 

education as a rallying theme among these entities at briefings, meetings and events. Integrating 

the findings outlined in the final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel will serve to 

further inform the work of this group, particularly when it comes to disseminating the information 

to Hispanic parents and families.

The Role of the Federal Government in Hispanic Education Attainment

Two of the commission’s recommendations that pertained to the federal government’s role in 

helping inform stakeholders, practitioners and communities concerned with the education attainment of Hispanic Americans were: 1) federal research; and 2) federal reporting of education 

outcomes. 

Regarding the first recommendation, some federal research has been conducted on the early literacy and language development of children, from birth to age 5, to produce high-quality, researchbased information to support early childhood education and care of English Language Learners 

(ELLs). The White House Initiative is supporting a federal interagency effort to expand the base 

of scientific research and knowledge about early childhood education for ELLs to better inform 

parents, practitioners and schools about the education needs of language minority children.
xv

With regard to the federal reporting of Hispanic education outcomes, some promising work is 

underway. The initial findings from a two-page form administered by the White House Initiative 

to 26 federal agencies in 2002 produced mixed results. A handful of federal agencies have since 

worked on developing a Web-based federal reporting tool to streamline the information-gathering 

and reporting process. The tool is designed to collect comprehensive data on federal education programs and services to Hispanic-serving education organizations and then report it in a 

transparent way to Hispanic constituents and the general public. The data that is gathered will be 

made available over the Internet and will include such information as grants awarded, measurable 

outcomes of programs and services, and the number of Hispanic children, students, families and 

communities served.2

Stakeholders and Assets in the Community

In the six years since NCLB was enacted, the president’s announcement of the ACI and the subsequent legislation passed by Congress to strengthen American competitiveness (the America 

COMPETES Act), much of the final implementation of their academic components and provisions still rests with schools and school districts, parents and families, educators and administrators, community and faith-based leaders, HSIs, and with public and private organizations. In 

many ways and in increasing numbers, the presence of these entities in Hispanic communities 

throughout the country represents an infrastructure of experience and resourcefulness. During 

the activities that the White House Initiative conducted, it encountered many organizations among 

its range of partners serving the education needs of children, families and communities. They 

were engaged, committed and deeply connected to the people they served. Together, they form 

important assets from which they each can draw for support and experience to maximize shared 

goals and efforts. 

Examples of some of those efforts included the White House Initiative’s support of the first-ever 

national conference on Hispanic education held in September 2007 by the White House Office 

of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives, at which more than 800 individuals representing more 

than 500 faith-based and community organizations attended. In early 2008, the leaders of the 

nation’s largest Hispanic STEM associations convened in their first joint board meeting to map 

out plans to improve Hispanic education attainment in the STEM disciplines. Hispanic parents 

and families are, of course, the most valuable asset when it comes to the academic preparation 

of their children, beginning at the earliest ages. 

Channels of Communication

From the outset, it was apparent to the White House Initiative that to fulfill a strategic recommendation of the commission and the promise of NCLB and other education reform initiatives, Hispanic parents and families had to be equipped with the information and knowledge they needed to 

2

 In November 2007, the U.S. Department of Education launched the Doing What Works Web site, available at 

http://dww.ed.gov/ (accessed July 1, 2008), to provide teachers, administrators and other educators with recommendations on effective teaching practices and examples of possible ways to implement those practices to help promote 

excellence in American education and improve student achievement. The first topic covered by the site featured information, research and practices geared toward English Language Learners. The site now provides resources on early 

childhood education and mathematics and science.
xvi

become strong advocates for their children’s education. Whether it meant having an understanding of the free tutorial services available for their children, the option to transfer their child to a 

better-performing school, or the courses their child should take to strengthen his or her academic 

preparation and success, the White House Initiative created channels of communication to ensure families received the information they needed to exercise these choices. These channels of 

communication included the distribution of more than 600,000 publications, in English and Spanish. Foremost among these publications was the Tool Kit for Hispanic Families. 

Other channels of communication included: the White House Initiative’s Web site, with its wealth 

of education information for parents and families, students, educators, schools and school districts, and the general public; a weekly e-newsletter to partner organizations and stakeholder 

groups; and events designed to raise awareness about all the elements of education reform and 

the increasing improvement in Hispanic education attainment.

Education Reform and Hispanic Education Attainment

The ultimate purpose for the president’s creation of the commission, the activities that the White 

House Initiative undertook, and education reform itself, were all designed to support the improvement of the education attainment of Hispanic students and close the academic achievement gap. 

According to the latest National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) reports and the College Board, it appears that such efforts are paying off in the form of increased proficiency scores in 

reading and math and in the passing scores in Advanced Placement (AP) subjects. These results 

are a testament to the need to reinforce early childhood development, parent and family involvement, academic preparation, accountability, and highly qualified teachers—all elements of NCLB. 

The progress encountered to date must be expanded from the states in which it is occurring and 

brought to the nation as a whole. Education reform also must be strengthened, particularly in light 

of the substantial growth in the enrollment of Hispanic students in our nation’s schools. The U.S. 

Department of Education has instituted strong policy initiatives designed to help states build on 

this progress and to target efforts in schools most in need of improvement. Integral to sustaining 

this progress is the increasing involvement of Hispanic parents and families as active partners in 

helping close the academic achievement gap.

Taken together, the activities the White House Initiative undertook, and its accomplishments, are 

encouraging signs about the prospects for improving the education attainment of Hispanic students and closing the academic achievement gap. 
Introduction

On Oct. 12, 2001, President George W. Bush signed Executive Order 13230, creating the President’s Advisory Commission on Educational Excellence for Hispanic Americans. In the same 

executive order, the president designated the White House Initiative on Educational Excellence 

for Hispanic Americans (White House Initiative) as the office that would provide staff support and 

assistance to the commission in its charge to examine the underlying causes of the existing education achievement gap between Hispanic American students and their peers.

Over a period of 18 months, the commission heard from hundreds of parents, students, educators, 

community and business leaders, and education experts at commission meetings and bilingual 

town halls held throughout the country. This work resulted in an interim report that was submitted 

to President Bush on Sept. 30, 2002. The Road to a College Diploma: The Complex Reality of 

Raising Educational Achievement for Hispanics in the United States contained the commission’s 

initial findings on the state of Hispanic education in the U.S. and outlined the education issues that 

required the nation’s attention to close the achievement gap.

On March 31, 2003, the commission submitted its final report to the President, From Risk to 

Opportunity: Fulfilling the Educational Needs of Hispanic Americans in the 21st Century, which 

contained six recommendations for increasing the education achievement of Hispanics. These 

recommendations encompassed the entire education continuum, from early childhood education 

through postsecondary degree attainment, to recommendations to improve federal accountability, 

coordination and research.

Recommendation: Set new and high expectations across America for Hispanic American children by: helping parents navigate the education system; creating partnerships that can provide expanded options for children; 

and implementing a nationwide public awareness and motivation campaign 

aimed at increasing education attainment and achieving the goal of a college education.

Recommendation: Fully implement and enforce the provisions of the No 

Child Left Behind Act. 

Recommendation: Reinforce a high-quality teaching profession by more 

fully preparing all teachers to address the diverse needs of their students, 

including Hispanics, those with disabilities and those with limited English 

proficiency, by attracting more Hispanics to the teaching profession, and 

by providing incentives and compensation for successful performance as 

evidenced by improved student achievement.
2

Recommendation: Initiate a new coherent and comprehensive research 

agenda on the education development of Hispanic Americans across the 

education spectrum, from preschool through postsecondary levels.

Recommendation: Ensure full access for Hispanic American students to 

enter college and demand greater accountability in higher education for 

Hispanic graduation rates. 

Recommendation: Increase the accountability and coordination of programs within the federal government to better serve Hispanic American 

children and their families. 

The fulfillment of these recommendations would, according to the commission, serve to accelerate the pace of education reform across all sectors and lead to the increased education attainment 

of Hispanic students. This report highlights the key components that comprised a comprehensive 

effort undertaken by the White House Initiative to engage each sector and the stakeholders that 

would need to be a part of helping to close the achievement gap for Hispanic students. It begins with the premise that Hispanic parents and families are not passive agents in this process; 

instead, as the ultimate consumers of education outcomes, they were integral to the efforts the 

White House Initiative undertook to transform education outcomes for Hispanic students. Thus, 

the partnership, outreach and communications activities described in this report were implemented in that context. 

To help the reader navigate this report, it should be noted that the commission’s recommendations are discussed in the sections to which they correspond. In addition, the recommendations 

have been set in text boxes to differentiate them from the rest of the text in which they appear.
White House Initiative Activities, 

Accomplishments and Hispanic 

Education Attainment:

2001–08

Partners in Hispanic Education

Recommendation: The commission strongly supports full implementation 

and full enforcement of the No Child Left Behind Act.

The commission’s recommendations became the basis for the White House Initiative undertaking 

a public-private partnership in July 2003. This yearlong effort teamed the White House Initiative 

with leading national Hispanic organizations, corporate leaders and national private entities to 

further public understanding of NCLB, thereby empowering the Hispanic American community—

through the education tools and resources afforded them under the law—to become stronger 

advocates for their children’s education.

2003 Public-Private Partnership Organizations

Association for the Advancement of Mexican Americans (AAMA)

Cuban American National Council (CNC)

El Valor

Girl Scouts of the USA

Hispanic Association of Colleges and Universities (HACU)

Hispanic College Fund (HCF)

Hispanic Council for Reform and Educational Options (Hispanic CREO)

Hispanic Information and Telecommunications Network (HITN-TV)

Hispanic Youth Foundation (HYF)

MANA—A National Latina Organization (MANA)

Mexican Institute of Greater Houston

National Association of Hispanic Publications (NAHP)

National Council for Community and Education Partnerships (NCCEP)

National Society of Hispanic MBAs (NSHMBA)

State Farm Insurance

Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB)

U.S. Army

United States Hispanic Chamber of Commerce Foundation (USHCC)

To accomplish this task, the partners hosted a series of education fairs, or ferias educativas, in 

seven cities across the country. These cities were selected taking into account several factors: 

percentage of schools identified as in need of improvement under NCLB; percentage of Hispanic 

student enrollment; change in Hispanic population from 1990–2000; percentage of Hispanic students who were English Language Learners; percentage of schools with free and reduced-price 

lunch programs (as a determinant of the percentage of students who are from low-income families); and, determination of which partner organizations had a local presence. 

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•
Partnership Events

In each city, partners took on the role of “lead partners” and, in concert with local community 

leaders, coordinated the planning and implementation of the education fairs. Each fair involved a 

series of events, including town hall meetings and education conferences for parents, students, 

educators and business and community leaders—the latter of which included seminars on student financial aid and scholarship support. 

Town Halls

A bilingual town hall meeting was held in each city in conjunction with the education conference 

to allow the partners to hear directly from community members about local education needs and 

to serve as a forum for educating the community about NCLB. Participants in the events included 

public officials, prominent Hispanic role models and leaders, local businesses, community and 

education leaders, and Hispanic parents and students. 

Education Conferences

A one- or two-day education conference was held in selected cities to educate community members about NCLB, provide education tools to parents, and raise awareness about local and national programs available to help Hispanic students in the area. The conferences consisted of 

concurrent strands, each directed toward the different stakeholders, such as students, parents, 

educators, school administrators and community and business leaders. In conjunction with these 

conferences, financial aid seminars were held to familiarize Hispanic students and their parents 

with the process for securing financial aid resources for college. 

Through the use of Web-based technology (webcasts), the Association for the Advancement of 

Mexican Americans broadcast selected portions of three education conferences to several other 

communities. Audiences at these locations received educational materials and were able to interact live with panelists, presenters and participants at the event site. The initial event in San Diego, 

Calif., was transmitted to Chula Vista, Calif., and Phoenix, Ariz. From the Bronx, N.Y., audiences 

in San Antonio and Houston, Texas, and Miami, Fla., participated in the program. The most extensive broadcast was transmitted from Albuquerque, N.M., to audiences in Houston, Miami, Las 

Vegas, Nev., and Chula Vista, Calif.

Outreach Efforts

A local steering committee was formed in each city to ensure that these partnership events were 

informative and adapted to meet the education needs of each community. Through the local 

steering committee, the community was not only actively engaged in the planning of events but 

served as a conduit to the community for providing updates, facilitating the dissemination of information about local education opportunities, and organizing follow-up conferences and events 

for local partners, based on identified needs. The White House Initiative developed a newsletter 

to keep partners and local planning committee members informed about subsequent partnership 

activities.

In addition to a media-communications committee created at each event site, the National Association of Hispanic Publications disseminated event information to a wide variety of Spanish-
language and bilingual publications and periodicals. Thus, the educational events garnered local, 

and in some cases, national media attention.

During the course of the year, more than 3,500 students, parents, educators, education administrators and community and business leaders attended the seven events. More than 100,000 

bilingual publications from the U.S. Department of Education (ED) and the White House Initiative, 

as well as other partner publications, were distributed. At the conclusion of the yearlong program, 

a culminating event was held at the White House in July 2004 to recognize the efforts of local and 

national partners. 

San Diego, Calif.

Date: Nov. 22, 2003

Location: San Diego State University

Partner(s): MANA, State Farm Insurance and Girl Scouts of the USA

Miami, Fla.

Date: Dec. 5–6, 2003

Location: Miami Dade College

Partner(s): NCCEP and HACU

The Bronx, N.Y.

Date: Feb. 6–7, 2004 

Location: Hostos Community College

Partner(s): USHCC and NCCEP

Tucson, Ariz.

Date: March 5–6, 2004

Location: University of Arizona

Partner(s): USHCC 

Albuquerque, N.M.

Date: March 19–20, 2004 

Location: University of New Mexico

Partner(s): NCCEP

El Paso, Texas, and Las Cruces, N.M.

Date: April 24, 2004

Location: University of Texas at El Paso

Partner(s): MANA, State Farm Insurance and Girl Scouts of the USA

Detroit, Mich.

Date: Sept. 23, 2004

Location: Detroit Public Schools Welcome Center

Partner(s): MANA, State Farm Insurance, Ford Motor Company Fund, 

NAHP, Detroit Public Schools, WTVS Detroit Public Television and

Girl Scouts of the USA
8

The program, Partners in Hispanic Education, fortified the White House Initiative’s belief in the 

necessity of coordinating efforts, fortifying relationships and making optimal use of the resources 

that stakeholders possess to effectively reach Hispanic families with school-age children.

The Partners in Hispanic Education also illustrated the promise that NCLB held for closing the academic achievement gap for the nation’s Hispanic children. However, the White House Initiative 

also observed that there was a substantial knowledge gap that existed in the Hispanic community 

about the options and opportunities that education reform afforded families and their children. 

This meant that any approach going forward had to raise awareness and place the wealth of existing education information into the hands of Hispanic parents and families. 
The Partnership for Hispanic Family 

Learning

Building on the lessons learned from the Partners in Hispanic Education, the White House Initiative convened a working group in 2004 to develop a new course of action. This called for the 

formation of a broader public-private partnership that drew on the attributes and traditional values 

of the Hispanic family—and, by definition, the extended family—as a way to positively influence 

the education outcomes of Hispanics in the U.S. and maximize the use of the numerous options 

and opportunities afforded by NCLB and other education programs. 

The working group concluded that there existed a need to combine various interests and efforts 

into one comprehensive approach that drew on two fundamental premises: 1) the family should 

be a focus through which education outcomes are improved; and, 2) public-private partnerships 

should be the vehicles through which families are reached. 

To that end, in June 2005, the White House Initiative and ED convened a conference in Washington, D.C., titled “Pathways to Hispanic Family Learning.” The conference, attended by more than 

200 national Hispanic leaders, highlighted private and public efforts to meet the education needs 

of Hispanic children and youths.

Panel sessions featured a variety of results-driven education outreach efforts that various stakeholders such as community, nonprofit and faith-based organizations, corporations, federal agencies and others were conducting. Officiating at the event were U.S. Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings and U.S. Treasurer Anna Escobedo Cabral.

Partnership

This conference set the stage for the White House Initiative’s Partnership for Hispanic Family Learning, a national network of public and private organizations that would provide Hispanic 

families with the knowledge and tools needed to help them prepare their children for academic 

success. The Partnership for Hispanic Family Learning was launched in late 2005.

Recommendation: Set new and high expectations across America for Hispanic American children by: helping parents navigate the education system, creating partnerships that can provide expanded options for children 

and implementing a nationwide public awareness and motivation campaign 

aimed at increasing education attainment and achieving the goal of a college education.

There are over 9 million Hispanic households in the U.S., of which nearly 6 million have schoolage children (U.S. Census Bureau 2003). However, a substantial number of these families are 
10

unaware of the options and opportunities that education reform such as No Child Left Behind offers them. The Partnership for Hispanic Family Learning sought to disseminate a wealth of new 

and existing education information to Hispanic parents and families in communities across the 

country. The White House Initiative believes that this information, when placed in the hands of 

parents, would become a powerful tool that would enable them to make informed decisions about 

their children’s education. In the process, they could become powerful allies in helping close the 

achievement gap for Hispanic students. 

However, the White House Initiative alone could not reach all of the nation’s Hispanic families and 

children. Thus, the office set out to enlist a range of public and private organizations to join the 

partnership network. The partnership, comprised of organization representatives from the business, community, faith-based, education and government sectors, focused on: early childhood 

development and early reading; parent and family involvement; academic preparation and high 

school graduation; college enrollment, affordability and completion; adult literacy; and workplace 

literacy.

To date, more than 400 organizations—small, medium and large—located in 35 states, plus the 

District of Columbia and Puerto Rico, are part of the Partnership for Hispanic Family Learning.

Other

16%

Business

4%

Faith-based

Organization

6%

Education Institution

26%

Community-based or

Nonprofit Organization

48%

Figure 1. Percentage distribution of White House Initiative partner 

 organizations, by type of organization: 2001–08

Source: Data from the White House Initiative’s Hispanic Family Learning partners-to-date 

database, 2001–08.
11

Regional Conferences

Through its network of partners and other organizations, the White House Initiative convened 

regional conferences throughout the country. These conferences were one of the main avenues 

through which the office distributed information and resources, such as publications—including 

the Tool Kit for Hispanic Families, a comprehensive resource produced specifically for Hispanic 

parents and families—education statistics, NCLB updates, grants and other funding opportunities, and promising practices among partner organizations.

The first regional event, held in May 2006 in Albuquerque, N.M., was cohosted by Youth Development, Inc., a community-based youth service system offering a continuum of care designed 

to help vulnerable and at-risk children, youths and families. The second regional conference, 

held in Santa Ana, Calif., in September 2006, was cohosted by the Orange County Department 

of Education, the Santa Ana Unified School District, the Orange County United Way, and Los 

Kitos Entertainment, LLC. More than 300 copies of the new Tool Kit for Hispanic Families were 

first distributed at this regional conference. The third regional conference was held in Suwanee 

and Norcross, Ga., in May 2007 and was cohosted by the Latin American Association, which 

helps Latino families through direct programs and integrated community partnerships that focus 

on youth academic achievement, education and prevention, and services to families with urgent 

needs. More than 600 participants from the hosting and surrounding states attended these regional conferences, representing schools, parents and community, business, nonprofit and faithbased leaders. More than 7,000 White House Initiative and ED publications were distributed at 

these events, and hundreds more were requested as a result of these conferences.

These events focused on the ways in which various stakeholders are working to meet the education needs of Hispanic families and covered topics ranging from early childhood development to 

postsecondary education, with particular attention to the relationship of topics to No Child Left 

Behind. They also served to highlight: the importance of engaging partnerships; the value of 

assessing a community’s education needs, assets and resources; and the how-to of identifying 

federal grants and private resources. 

During the regional conferences, it became evident that academic preparation, particularly in the 

core subjects of mathematics and science, had emerged as an important focus of the partnership. 

As part of that expanded effort, the White House Initiative sought to engage important stakeholders in the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields, including HispanicServing Institutions (HSIs), key federal agencies, K–12 public schools, the technology industry, 

and Hispanic science and engineering associations, to support and promote Hispanic educational 

attainment in math and science.
12
13

Hispanic Science, Technology, 

Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) 

Education 

Background

In late 2005, the White House Initiative began to devise plans to convene federal agencies and 

Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSIs) in meetings to specifically address ways in which HSIs3 could 

support education reform through teacher preparation and development, the formation of K-16 

partnerships, and an increase in Hispanic graduates in mathematics and science. The first federal-HSI meeting was held in April 2006 and focused on international education programs.

The real impetus, however, for improving education for Hispanics in the STEM fields was derived 

from the American Competitiveness Initiative (ACI) that President George W. Bush announced in 

his State of the Union in January 2006.

The ACI is a comprehensive strategy designed to: 1) increase federal investment in critical research; 2) ensure that the United States continues to lead the world in opportunity and innovation; 

and 3) provide American children with a strong foundation in mathematics and science. 

The American economy is preeminent, but we cannot afford to be 

complacent. ... To keep America competitive, one commitment is 

necessary above all: We must continue to lead the world in human 

talent and creativity. Our greatest advantage in the world has always 

been our educated, hardworking, ambitious people—and we’re going 

to keep that edge. We need to encourage children to take more math 

and science, and to make sure those courses are rigorous enough to 

compete with other nations. ... If we ensure that America’s children 

succeed in life, they will ensure that America succeeds in the world.

—President George W. Bush

State of the Union

Jan. 31, 2006

3

 A Hispanic-Serving Institution (HSI), as defined by the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended, is as an institution 

of higher education that at the end of the award year immediately preceding the date of the application has at least 25 

percent Hispanic full-time equivalent (FTE) undergraduate student enrollment and provides assurances that not less 

than 50 percent of the institution’s Hispanic students are low-income individuals. 
14

National Mathematics Advisory Panel

Several of the key academic elements called for in the ACI have since come to fruition. On April 

18, 2006, President Bush established the National Mathematics Advisory Panel (Math Panel) to 

advise him and Secretary Spellings on the best use of scientifically based research on the teaching and learning of mathematics. The Math Panel’s experts in mathematics, cognitive science 

and education reviewed the current literature and identified important research findings as well 

as gaps in our current knowledge. The panel conducted a comprehensive assessment of existing 

math research and established principles for effective instruction. In addition, the Math Panel held 

several meetings across the country and released two reports in 2007—Preliminary Report: National Mathematics Advisory Panel and the Final Report on the National Survey of Algebra Teachers for the National Math Panel—and a final report, Foundations for Success: The Final Report 

of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel, in March 2008. The panel also issued its Reports of 

the Task Groups and Subcommittees in one volume in May 2008.

The National Math Panel’s final report contains 45 findings and recommendations on numerous 

topics including instructional practices, materials, professional development and assessments. 

Major areas covered by the report include: core principles of math instruction; the importance of: 

student effort; knowledgeable teachers; effective instruction; effective assessment; and research. 

Highlights from the report are listed in Appendix E.

ACI Scholarship Programs

Another important component of ACI was its inclusion of two grant programs established to provide financial support for low-income students.

Academic Competitiveness Grants

The Academic Competitiveness Grants (ACG) Program provides increased funding for low-income students who successfully complete a rigorous academic curriculum in high school. Grants 

in the amount of up to $750 are awarded to first-year Pell-eligible undergraduate students and up 

to $1,300 to second-year, full-time college students who maintain a cumulative grade point average (GPA) of 3.0.

Recommendation: Ensure full access for Hispanic American students to 

enter college and demand greater accountability in higher education for 

Hispanic graduation rates. 

National SMART Grants

Funding from the National Science and Mathematics Access to Retain Talent (SMART) Grant 

Program, also known as National Smart Grants, is available during the third and fourth years of 

undergraduate study to full-time Pell-eligible students who are majoring in: the physical, life or 
15

computer sciences; mathematics; technology; engineering; or in critical foreign languages. The 

grant provides up to $4,000 to college juniors and seniors who maintain a cumulative GPA of 3.0.

As of July 28, 2008, approximately $300.9 million in ACG and approximately $198.6 million in 

National SMART Grant funds were disbursed to 409,000 and 68,000 students, respectively, for 

academic year 2007–08 (U.S. Department of Education 2008). 

These grant programs encourage students to take more challenging courses in high school and 

to pursue majors leading to future employment in fields that are in high demand in the global 

economy, such as science, mathematics, technology, engineering and critical foreign languages.

Moreover, parents, families and educators must ensure that Hispanic students undertake the 

necessary academic preparation to become eligible to take advantage of scholarship opportunities such as these.

The America COMPETES Act

In August 2007, President Bush signed into law the America Creating Opportunities to Meaningfully Promote Excellence in Technology, Education and Science Act (or the America COMPETES 

Act). Passed with strong bipartisan support, this law reflects the goals of the president’s American 

Competitiveness Initiative and authorized the president’s proposed Math Now Program to provide teachers with research-based tools and professional development to improve mathematics 

instruction and elementary and middle school students’ achievement in mathematics, particularly 

in algebra. (As of this writing, Congress had not yet funded this program.) 

In addition, the America COMPETES Act authorized the president’s proposed Advanced Placement and International Baccalaureate (AP and IB) Program. The program, if funded, would expand low-income students’ access to AP and IB course work by training thousands more high 

school teachers to lead AP and IB courses in mathematics, science and critical foreign languages 

in high-need schools. It targets low-income school districts, authorizes incentives and training to 

teachers to become highly qualified instructors of AP and IB mathematics and science courses, 

and subsidizes testing fees for low-income students. 

... [T]his administration is committed to making sure our students 

develop the skills they need to compete and thrive. ... Ours is a heavy 

responsibility. We must ensure that our education system remains 

top-notch, and that every student who seeks that education has the 

opportunity to acquire it.

—Secretary Margaret Spellings

U.S. University Presidents Summit on International Education

Jan. 5, 2006
16

Higher Education and Hispanic-Serving Institutions

Institutions of higher education, and Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSIs) in particular, have an important role to play in maximizing the enormous opportunities inherent in the ACI and the America 

COMPETES Act. They can help advance America’s competitiveness, provided they have the 

necessary capacity and infrastructure to respond at the levels required. 

I

n September 2005, Secretary Spellings created the Commission on the 

Future of Higher Education to develop a strategy for postsecondary education that would meet the needs of America’s diverse population and address the economic and workforce needs of the country’s future. The following year, in spring 2006, the commission released the report A Test of 

Leadership: Charting the Future of U.S. Higher Education, that highlighted 

four areas of higher education in need of restructuring and strengthening—

access, cost and affordability, financial aid, and accountability—to make 

U.S. colleges and universities more transparent, accessible and competitive in today’s rapidly changing global market. 

Moreover, HSIs have a vested interest in ensuring that their students have received the academic 

preparation necessary for degree completion and, in the process, draw from these same graduates to staff their institutions’ mathematics, science and engineering departments and programs.

 

Recommendation: Ensure full access for Hispanic American students to 

enter college and demand greater accountability in higher education for 

Hispanic graduation rates. 
17

Conference on the American Competitiveness Initiative: Challenges and 

Opportunities for Hispanic-Serving Institutions

With the goal of helping HSIs attain needed capacity and infrastructure, the White House Initiative 

convened a conference in April 2007 at the University of Texas at El Paso titled “The American 

Competitiveness Initiative: Challenges and Opportunities for Hispanic-Serving Institutions.” The 

purpose of the conference was to raise awareness about the key components of the ACI and to 

create a framework within which recommendations and strategies could be developed to respond 

to the ACI challenge, particularly by HSIs.

ACI-HSI Conference Planning Committee

Michael Acosta, University of Texas at El Paso

Beatrice Bernfield, U.S. Department of Homeland Security

Rosenda Chavez, U.S.-Mexico Foundation for Science

Senora Coggs, U.S. Department of Commerce, Office of Civil Rights

Hector DeLeon, U.S. Department of Homeland Security

Tyrrell Flawn, U.S. Department of Education, National Mathematics 

 Advisory Panel 

Maria Goldberg, U.S. Department of Agriculture

Diana Gomez, Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers

Gilberto Guerrero, U.S. Department of Agriculture

Joseph M. Guzman, U.S. Department of Defense

Alain E. Hunter, U.S. Department of Defense

Desiree Linson, U.S. Department of Homeland Security

Alberto Lopez, University of Texas at El Paso

Astrid Martinez, U.S. Department of Agriculture

Joseph V. Martinez, U.S. Department of Energy

Milagros (Millie) Mateu, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Jacqueline Robinson, National Security Agency

Victor A. Santiago, National Science Foundation

Rafaela Schwan, Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers

Ken Zeff, U.S. Department of Education

Susan Heller Zeisler, U.S. Department of Commerce, National Institute of

 Standards and Technology

More than 200 participants attended the conference, a majority of whom were presidents, deans 

and senior faculty, and administrators from more than 60 HSIs in 14 states, plus Puerto Rico 

and the District of Columbia. There were also representatives from federal agencies, including 

the National Science Foundation, the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science, the U.S. 

Department of Commerce’s National Institute for Standards and Technology, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and ED, among others. Several of 

these federal agencies shared information about the opportunities available to HSIs to help them 

develop the capacity to provide a world-class education, strengthen their research and contribute 

to the nation’s competitiveness.
18

Several high-tech corporate representatives were also present, as were representatives of Hispanic mathematics and science organizations and associations. Finally, representatives from 

schools and school districts and national education experts also contributed significantly to the 

depth of the conference.

... We are living in critical times, and many people fail to see the 

technological crisis that is unfolding before our very eyes ... . With 

[the White House Initiative’s] help, we will be able to disseminate key 

information about EPA research opportunities ... an impossible task 

for us to achieve, until now.

— Maria E. Pimentel

Hispanic Employment Program Manager

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Speakers and panelists provided substantive and informative presentations about the nation’s 

need for talent and innovative research in the STEM fields and how HSIs could help meet that 

need. The speakers touched on the academic components of the ACI aimed at increasing research and development, strengthening education and encouraging entrepreneurship. The conference sessions addressed topics ranging from academic preparation, retention and graduation 

of more Hispanic students in the STEM fields to technology commercialization and the research 

needs of the private sector. 

Although I have thanked you informally for the excellent job you all 

have done, I am writing ... to express my deep gratitude for bringing 

this forum to life. The issues addressed ... are critical for our nation’s 

future. It was a useful and illuminating experience ... . I hope that we 

will see more of these types of conferences in the future.

— Christos Valiotis

Assistant Professor of Physics and Title V-HSI Program Director

Antelope Valley College

One of the panel sessions addressed an important goal of the ACI: to have 100,000 additional 

teachers qualified to teach AP and IB mathematics, science and critical foreign languages by 

2015. To accomplish this goal, the ACI proposes a two-step approach to provide professional 

development opportunities for current teachers and attract new teachers to the classroom. The 

panel session also addressed the critical need for highly qualified teachers at every grade level 

and discussed teacher-development programs and innovative schools of education. This goal is 
19

consistent with the President’s Advisory Commission’s recommendation to reinforce a high-quality teaching profession.

Recommendation: Reinforce a high-quality teaching profession by more 

fully preparing all teachers to address the diverse needs of their students, 

including Hispanics, those with disabilities and those with limited English 

proficiency, by attracting more Hispanics to the teaching profession, and 

by providing incentives and compensation for successful performance as 

evidenced by improved student achievement.

Many attendees also emphasized that HSIs should establish or strengthen partnerships with 

K–12 schools, the business community, Hispanic science and technology associations, and even 

other institutions of higher education to help develop their capacity and infrastructure to meet the 

challenges and opportunities inherent in ACI. Many attendees and speakers contended that there 

is an urgency to work across sectors, from Pre-K through postsecondary institutions, to fully address the critical need for talent and research.

I am writing to congratulate you on a very successful conference ... . 

The full impact of your constructive efforts are impossible to capture 

in a few words, but it is very clear that you are planting essential seeds 

of collaboration and support, within and between Hispanic-serving 

universities and related community organizations. This is an important 

and lasting contribution that I am honored to have been a part of.

— Joseph M. Guzman

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Strategic Diversity Integration

Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force

Conference Outcome: WHI-ACI Working Group 

An important outcome of the ACI-HSI conference was the emergence of a diverse working group 

of stakeholders, including representatives from the corporate sector, HSIs, K–12 schools, Hispanic STEM associations, and nonprofit organizations that expressed the need to further engage 

in constructive dialogue to build on the momentum generated by the conference.

Further, as a result of the information shared during the ACI-HSI conference, many of these same 

stakeholders—Ray Mellado, HENAAC; Diana Gomez, Society of Professional Hispanic Engineers (SHPE); Michael Acosta, Society of Mexican American Engineers and Scientists (MAES) 

and the University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP); Aaron Velazco, Society for Advancement of Chicanos and Native Americans in Science (SACNAS); and John Santos, Manuel Arts High School, 
20

Los Angeles—were encouraged to participate in the Competitive Crisis Council’s (CCC)4 summit 

“California Is at Great Risk: Securing Our Competitiveness in a Global Market,” held at California 

State Polytechnic University (Cal Poly Pomona) in September 2007. Special sessions and speakers addressed the critical issues affecting the STEM community and the importance of producing 

scalable and measurable results, producing positive education outcomes. A variety of workshops, 

aimed at elementary, middle and high school principals and teachers, addressed the issues of 

increasing parental involvement and establishing and finding funding for STEM programs. 

The White House Initiative’s ACI-HSI conference marked the beginning of a dialogue and served 

as the catalyst that spurred further discussions and efforts which are to ensure that each stakeholder is doing its part to improve Hispanic students’ education attainment and to keep America 

competitive and prosperous for generations to come.

WHI-ACI Working Group: Looking Ahead

Since the conference at UTEP, this group of stakeholders has proceeded on various levels to 

continue a dialogue about ways to work together along shared goals. The Hispanic STEM associations, in particular, have since held a joint board meeting to map out plans to undertake 

joint efforts to expand STEM opportunities in the Hispanic community, the federal government, 

and the private sector. These and others are expanding their understanding and awareness of 

key national STEM efforts such as the National Math Science Initiative—a nonprofit organization 

dedicated to expanding programs that have a proven impact on math and science—and forums 

convened on this topic in Washington, D.C. The group is also seeking to strengthen relationships 

with K–12 public schools and institutions of higher education to create seamless transitions for 

Hispanic students seeking to pursue STEM disciplines. The White House Initiative anticipates 

that this group of stakeholders will grow and assume an expanding role in helping fill the nation’s 

need for talent in the STEM fields.

4

 The Competitive Crisis Council (CCC) is a coalition of corporations, educators and Hispanic engineering organizations 

dedicated to building a pipeline of qualified technical talent in the U.S.
21

The Role of the Federal Government in

Hispanic Education Attainment

Federal agencies have played and stand to play prominent roles in supporting the White House 

Initiative’s effort to meet the education needs of Hispanic Americans, particularly given the impetus created by both the ACI and the America COMPETES Act. Two other important areas in which 

the federal government can perform an important role in helping inform stakeholders, practitioners, and communities concerned with the education attainment of Hispanic Americans are: 1) 

federal research; and 2) federal reporting of education outcomes. 

Early Childhood Education of English Language Learners

The first activity, federal research, relates to the White House Initiative’s participation in and support of a federal interagency collaboration on, and coordination of, programs and services for 

children from birth to age 5. That collaboration seeks to provide high-quality, research-based 

information that can enhance the early childhood education of English Language Learners (ELLs) 

and help them enter school ready to succeed.

Recommendation: Initiate a new coherent and comprehensive research 

agenda on the educational development of Hispanic Americans across the 

educational spectrum from preschool through postsecondary levels.

ELLs represent more than 5 million students in K–12 public schools. Of this 5 million, approximately 80 percent, or 4 million, are Hispanic, and more than 2 million of the total ELL population is 

enrolled in prekindergarten through the third grade (National Clearinghouse for English Language 

Acquisition 2005). Within this group, approximately 460 languages are represented, with Spanish 

accounting for 80 percent of the non-English languages (Kindler 2002). Much of the increase in 

the number of students who speak Spanish is fueled by the rapid growth of the Hispanic population with a significant number of ELLs within this population and age group.

Because of this growth, Spanish-speaking children and their families are increasingly becoming a 

considerable portion of the population that is served by federal and state-level initiatives and early 

childhood programming efforts. Given this demographic shift, it is vital that stakeholders, including 

the federal government, are engaged in using and promoting research and programs that address 

the needs of young children and their families within this particular population.

Early literacy and language development for young ELLs is critical because these skills are predictive of future reading and academic success. Studies have shown that ELLs in kindergarten 

are at risk of lagging behind their English-only peers. Unfortunately, the gap only appears to 

increase during later school years as the academic language used in instruction becomes more 

challenging (Coppola 2005). 
22

The Early Reading First Program is part of the president’s Good Start, Grow Smart Initiative. As 

a component of NCLB, it helps address this challenge and transform existing early education 

programs into centers of excellence that provide high-quality, early education to young children, 

especially those from low-income families. The critical importance of the overall purpose of this 

program, “to prepare young children to enter kindergarten with the necessary language, cognitive 

and early reading skills to prevent reading difficulties and ensure school success,”5 cannot be 

overstated. 

Early Childhood Education–ELL Federal Interagency Workgroup

To help ensure that these program objectives are met, the White House Initiative has participated 

in an Early Childhood Education–English Language Learners federal interagency workgroup to 

support and identify efforts that can provide high-quality, research-based information to enhance 

the early care of ELLs. Members of this interagency workgroup include: the U.S. Department of 

Health and Human Services’ Head Start office, Child Care Bureau, National Institute for Child 

Health and Human Development, and the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation at the 

Administration for Children and Families; and the U.S. Department of Education’s offices of Elementary and Secondary Education, English Language Acquisition, Special Education Programs, 

and the Institute of Education Sciences.

The main focus of this interagency workgroup has included: 1) analyzing the current status of federal programs and technical assistance for ELL children, teachers of ELLs and families of ELLs; 2) 

analyzing the status of federal and private research on ELL children; and 3) engaging in partnerships to support ELL children and their families and the communities who serve them.

The White House Initiative has been able to support some of the interagency workgroup’s efforts 

through its partnership network by engaging in events and activities that support increased access to high-quality, culturally and linguistically appropriate books and literacy-related materials 

for ELL children, their families and their communities. This participation has involved: the inclusion 

of an early childhood development presentation by a senior ED official at all of the White House 

Initiative’s regional conferences; collaboration in family literacy events with a high participation 

of Hispanic families, including the inaugural event of the Santa Fe Literacy Station Project done 

in conjunction with First Book and MANA; and yearly participation in the Chicago Family Book 

Festival, among other events and activities. The White House Initiative also promoted and hosted 

conference calls with its network of partners and organizations with a focus on increased access 

to quality, bilingual literature and programs that promote literacy among the Hispanic community, 

especially among low-income families.

As of this writing, the federal interagency workgroup, with support from the National Institute 

for Literacy, had begun to commission a search of existing literacy research on early childhood 

education and ELLs. This search would include several significant studies on this subject have 

been conducted by the National Center on Education Statistics within the Institute of Education 

Sciences, encompassing the National Household Education Surveys Program (NHES) and the 

Early Childhood Longitudinal Studies (ECLS). 

5

 Program description for Early Reading First, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, U.S. Department of 

Education, accessible at http://www.ed.gov/programs/earlyreading/index.html (accessed Aug. 5,2008).
23

As research has demonstrated, in their first five years, children develop the critical physical, emotional and cognitive skills they will need for the rest of their lives. Therefore, it is important that we 

continue to assess and build on current research regarding how to improve literacy outcomes for 

young (0 to 5 years of age), low-income ELLs.

Federal Web-based Reporting

For the second activity, reporting of federal efforts to meet the education needs of Hispanic Americans, the White House Initiative sought to develop a Web-based federal reporting system that 

makes more transparent and accessible information on federal programs and activities for Hispanic Americans. Such information can include data on the outcomes of programs intended to 

meet the education needs of Hispanic Americans, including whether the programs or services 

reached the targeted audiences (i.e., children, youths, adults or parents and families), and information on the results from such programs or services.

As established by the Executive Order 13230, one of the President’s Advisory Commission roles 

was to determine how federal departments and agencies are addressing the education needs of 

Hispanic Americans. A critical part of that role was to develop a monitoring system that measures 

and holds agencies accountable for coordinating federal efforts to ensure the participation of Hispanic Americans in federal education programs. The commission’s recommendation was made 

as a result of the White House Initiative’s initial experience in gathering information from federal 

agencies that produced mixed results. These results were largely based on the reliance of a paper 

form for reporting and the absence of measurable outcomes and uniformity across agencies. 

Recommendation: Increase the accountability and coordination of programs within the federal government to better serve Hispanic American 

children and their families. 

The Web-based federal reporting tool was designed to overcome this obstacle. Some federal 

agencies, particularly the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Minority 

Health, which developed and housed the prototype, and the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, 

had begun to explore ways to streamline the procedures that governed the development and 

processing of their respective reports to all of the White House Initiative offices.6 They worked 

closely with the White House Initiative on Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders to develop an 

early prototype of a Web-based federal reporting tool. The White House Initiative on Educational 

Excellence for Hispanic Americans joined these efforts and enlisted other federal agencies, including ED, to support the Web-based federal reporting tool’s development. 

Because all of the White House Initiative offices share reporting requirements, as provided by 

their respective executive orders, the White House Initiative felt that a shared online reporting 

6

 The White House Initiative offices include: the White House Initiative on Educational Excellence for Hispanic Americans, the White House Initiative on Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders, the White House Initiative on Historically 

Black Colleges and Universities, the White House Faith-Based and Community Initiatives, and the White House Initiative on Tribal Colleges and Universities.
24

system would maximize the usefulness of information the agencies reported while also streamlining the reporting process for agencies themselves. For the White House Initiative on Educational 

Excellence for Hispanic Americans, the purpose of the tool was to fulfill one of the six recommendations outlined in the President’s Advisory Commission’s final report. 

Moreover, the prototype received preliminary support by several agencies because it could be 

used as both a planning tool and a tool that measured performance. It would also introduce 

transparency to the way that federal programs, services, and grants are allocated among the 

constituents of all the White House Initiatives. For this office, in particular, it would demonstrate 

how departments and agencies across the federal government are responding to the educational 

needs of Hispanic Americans.

Federal Information and Reporting Management System (FIRMS)

The Office of Minority Health, in consultation with all of the White House Initiative offices, has 

been making steady progress with this Web-based system. To date, the design and programming of the Federal Information and Reporting Management System (FIRMS) is approximately 

80 percent complete. The steps remaining to complete FIRMS include: 1) modifications to ensure 

compliance with new federal data and information requirements; 2) direction from all of the White 

House Initiative offices on implementation requirements; 3) completion of data importation; 4) 

completion of a data gap analysis; and 5) completion of final system design modifications.

As an E-Government Initiative,7 the FIRMS is consistent with the President’s Management Agenda. When completed, it will also feature the capacity to report results, particularly as it relates to 

measuring improvement in the education outcomes for Hispanic students.

7

 In his February 2002 budget submission to Congress, President Bush outlined a management agenda for making 

government more focused on citizens and results, which includes expanding electronic government, or E-Government. 

E-Government uses improved Internet-based technology to make it easy for citizens and businesses to interact with the 

government, save taxpayer dollars and streamline citizen-to-government communications.
25

Stakeholders and Assets in the Hispanic 

Community

Whether it is through NCLB, federal research and reporting or the initiatives called for by the 

American Competitiveness Initiative or enacted in the America COMPETES Act, the federal government is doing its part to improve the education attainment of Hispanic children and youths. 

However, the federal government cannot do it alone. Other stakeholders, particularly in the Hispanic community, must help meet the challenge. 

At first glance, the growth of the Hispanic population in the U.S. over the past decade, combined 

with its youthful profile and low levels of education attainment (U.S. Census Bureau 2003), present a challenge to the most optimistic forecasts about the prospects of drawing future scientists, 

mathematicians and engineers from the Hispanic community. However, the White House Initiative 

believes that Hispanic Americans are poised to respond to this challenge by helping to prepare 

and supply an important source of the nation’s need for talent, particularly in the STEM fields. 

Throughout the White House Initiative’s activities surrounding the Partners in Hispanic Education, 

the Partnership for Hispanic Family Learning network, and particularly STEM education, the office encountered and enlisted a range of stakeholders8 from among its partner organizations that 

were doing their part to improve Hispanic education outcomes. In many respects, the work that 

these stakeholders are conducting and the experience they possess represent assets from which 

we can draw to help close the achievement gap for Hispanic Americans. The following are only a 

few of the many organizations—from early childhood to postsecondary education—that are working to improve education for Hispanic Americans.

Early Childhood Development

El Valor is an early childhood, multicultural, multipurpose organization that reaches thousands of 

families in the Chicago area through a series of programs and services. Focusing on families and 

children with disabilities, its early intervention strategies are designed to strengthen families with a 

child from birth to age 3 with a developmental disability. The organization does this by encouraging parents to become their child’s primary teacher and therapist. Through its Head Start classes, 

offered in both half-day and full-day sessions, El Valor helps children between the ages of 3 and 5 

develop critical skills that are needed for a lifetime of learning. In addition, El Valor provides bilingual training and support to day care providers to prepare them for licensing in Cook County and 

coordinates a network of licensed home care providers who care for children from birth to age 5. 

8

 The organizations cited in this section are not intended to be exhaustive or exclusive of any other organizations addressing a range of education activities. Moreover, the mention of or reference to any and all organizations and entities 

in this report does not constitute an endorsement of any kind by the U.S. Government, including but not limited to the 

U.S. Department of Education, the White House Initiative on Educational Excellence for Hispanic Americans, and any 

employees, affiliates, agents or representatives of the same. The U.S. Government, including but not limited to the U.S. 

Department of Education and the White House Initiative on Educational Excellence for Hispanic Americans, does not 

endorse any organization or entity referenced or mentioned in this report.
26

Virtual Pre-K is a teacher-created resource for parents and educators that connects the classroom, home and community in English and Spanish. It offers a variety of resources to its constituents, including: creative, standards-based lessons aligned with Illinois state goals and Head Start 

Learning Domains; hands-on activities for parents and children to try at home and other valuable 

resources. Virtual Pre-K has been adopted by the Chicago Public Schools System and is being 

implemented in early childhood programs across the country through partnerships in Texas, California and Nevada.

Hispanic Faith-based Community

The Hispanic faith-based community represents a significant segment of the Hispanic population 

that has been engaged in addressing the most critical issues of our time: education and immigration reform, housing, employment, family values, and social justice. The White House Initiative 

sought to work with the faith-based community to reach out to parents and families where they 

live, work and learn, with the information and resources they need to help their children achieve 

educational excellence. Several national and regional Hispanic faith-based organizations have 

responded with their extensive networks to reach and disseminate valuable information to their 

members. Among these are the National Coalition of Latino Clergy and Christian Leaders (CONLAMIC) in Washington, D.C., the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference in Sacramento, Calif., and Esperanza USA in Philadelphia, Pa., three of the largest Latino evangelical 

organizations in the country. Several others are providing a range of direct education services to 

parents, families and children, including Reading and Beyond (formerly Fresno Covenant Foundation) in Fresno, Calif., and Acción Social Comunitaria in St. Louis, Mo. 

Some have taken an active role in helping low-income Hispanic youths afford a quality education 

in private or faith-based schools. Don Bosco Cristo Rey High School in Takoma Park, Md., for 

example, is the newest school in the Archdiocese of Washington, D.C. It is part of the innovative 

Cristo Rey Network, comprising 19 schools across the U.S. that effectively serve economically 

disadvantaged youths by combining meaningful work experiences—which fund students’ education costs—with a college preparatory program. The Cristo Rey Network has a record of keeping 

predominantly minority and low-income students successfully engaged in school through high 

school graduation and preparing them for college and the workforce. 

Encouraged by these efforts, the White House Initiative collaborated with the White House FaithBased and Community Initiatives office and ED’s Center for Faith-Based and Community Initiatives to convene the first-ever Conference on Youth and Education in the Hispanic Community in 

September 2007. Up to 800 individuals representing more than 500 faith-based and community 

organizations nationwide attended this event in Washington, D.C. Featured speakers included 

Secretary Margaret Spellings as well as other representatives from: the U.S. departments of 

Housing and Urban Development, Justice and Education; CONLAMIC; Hispanic CREO; Esperanza USA; and Urban Strategies.

Hispanic-Serving Institutions

Hispanic-Serving Institutions are also doing their part to use federal support to improve Hispanic 

achievement in mathematics and science. For example, Cal Poly Pomona has several programs 

that recruit and retain students and faculty in STEM fields. In 2006, the National Science Founda-
27

tion awarded the university a multimillion dollar grant that helped launch a program to create recruitment, retention and professional development programs that help faculty in STEM disciplines 

advance to leadership positions. Its College of Engineering has the distinction of graduating the 

largest number of underrepresented engineers and computer scientists in the state. Cal Poly 

Pomona is also actively involved in preparing future science and mathematics teachers for the 

region’s diverse K–12 classrooms.

Other HSIs, such as Florida International University, the University of Texas at El Paso and the 

University of Texas Pan American, are doing their part to graduate more Hispanic students in the 

STEM fields. Others are raising expectations and improving the academic achievement of Hispanic students in elementary and secondary education. The University of Texas Pan American, 

in particular, conducts an annual conference, Hispanic Engineering, Science and Technology 

(HESTEC) Week, at which the importance of mathematics and science literacy is emphasized to 

thousands of students, ranging from Pre-K to the college level.

Hispanic-serving Schools and School Districts

Institutions of higher education, however, cannot isolate themselves from the education taking 

place in schools and school districts, often located in the same communities as the institutions. 

Seamless ways must be developed to ensure that the education that begins in elementary and 

secondary classrooms is sustained through the undergraduate and postgraduate levels and 

throughout a student’s lifetime.

Innovative efforts are underway in high schools and school districts throughout the country that 

are producing positive results. John Santos, founder of and lead teacher at the Imaging Sciences 

and Technology Academy (ISTA), Manual Arts High School, Los Angeles, helped to establish the 

nation’s first “2+4+C” College Early Entry Program at California State University. He is also the 

cofounder of the nationally recognized Viva Technology Program, designed to help K–12 students 

in urban and rural communities consider careers in the STEM fields. More importantly, students 

who have matriculated from ISTA to a four-year institution over the last seven years have a 100 

percent retention rate.9 That is, these students are either still enrolled in college or have persisted 

through to graduation.

Another high performer, Hidalgo Independent School District (Hidalgo ISD) located in South Texas, is a pre-K through 20 pipeline success story. In the education vernacular, it might be described as a “high-need”10 school district (i.e., one with low-income, high minority enrollment and 

a significant proportion of English Language Learners). Hidalgo ISD has a 100 percent Hispanic 

student enrollment, with 91 percent of its students categorized as “economically disadvantaged,” 

and 55 percent as ELL (Texas Education Agency 2006). However, Hidalgo ISD is defying all expectations about what the students in a “high-need” school district can achieve. With regard to the 

district’s adequate yearly progress (AYP) scores, in academic year 2006–07, 82 percent and 74 

9

 Data taken from the College Retention Rate section on the Imaging Sciences and Technology Academy (ISTA) Web 

site, available at http://istaacademy.org/graduationrate.htm (accessed Feb. 6, 2008). 

10 A high-need school or district, as defined by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, is a public elementary school, 

public secondary school, or public charter school in which at least 50 percent of the students enrolled in the school are 

from low-income families or that has a large percentage of students who qualify for assistance under the Individuals 

with Disabilities Education Act.
28

percent of Hidalgo ISD students scored “proficient” in English and mathematics, respectively, on 

state exams (Texas Education Agency 2007a). Hidalgo ISD is not only meeting state and federal 

standards, it is exceeding them.

For example, in academic year 2005–06, the Texas Education Agency acknowledged the school 

district for: Commended Performance in Social Studies; the Texas Success Initiative of its Higher 

Education Readiness Component in Math; Advanced Course-Dual Enrollment Completion; Attendance Rate; and Recommended High School Program (Texas Education Agency 2006). Then 

in academic year 2006–07, Hidalgo High School had an 85 percent high school graduation rate 

(Texas Education Agency 2007b). Furthermore, beginning in academic year 2007–08, Hidalgo 

ISD instituted a rigorous curriculum that provides the first cohort of sophomores with an opportunity to enroll and earn up to 60 college credit hours in AP and college-level courses by the time they 

graduate from high school (Hidalgo Independent School District 2008). To a large extent, many of 

Hidalgo ISD’s accomplishments are likely attributable to the superintendent and the school board 

president’s leadership in bringing about education reform.

Districts like Hidalgo ISD, Ysleta ISD and Aldine ISD in Texas, Pueblo School District in Colorado 

or Calexico Unified School District in California represent an increasing number of Hispanic-serving school districts that are leading efforts that are resulting in the narrowing of the academic 

achievement gap between Hispanic students and their non-Hispanic peers. 

STEM Organizations and Associations for Hispanics

Other stakeholders are bridging K-12 schools and school districts with institutions of higher education and industry. They represent another important resource in the community that is helping 

to inspire, prepare and enroll more Hispanic youths in institutions of higher education, particularly 

in the STEM fields.

HENAAC11 is an organization that seeks to promote the achievements of Hispanic Americans in 

science, technology, engineering and mathematics. It also serves to motivate and educate more 

students to pursue careers in these fields. In the process, it hopes to increase the role the Hispanic community plays in maintaining America’s status as the world’s technology leader. 

One of its programs, Viva Technology, which was cited earlier, is designed to engage inner-city 

and rural K-12 students, teachers and parents in the applications of technology to stimulate interest and academic achievement in mathematics, science and engineering, thereby laying the 

foundation for students to select and succeed in college and university degree programs leading 

to careers in these fields.

The White House Initiative was encouraged by the breadth and depth of work that Hispanic STEM 

associations are conducting to develop Hispanic talent in math and science. For example, the Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers (SHPE) has been conducting such work since its found11 HENAAC was established in 1989 as a means of identifying, honoring and documenting the contributions of outstanding Hispanic American science, engineering, technology and mathematics professionals. The HENAAC acronym stood 

for the Hispanic Engineer National Achievement Awards Conference. In 1996, HENAAC became a 501(c) 3 educational 

programs nonprofit organization, a new classification that allowed HENAAC to develop additional education programs 

beyond the conference. In 2005, the HENAAC board of directors voted to drop the use of the acronym and changed the 

official name and tag line to “HENAAC—Promoting Careers in Science, Technology, Engineering and Math.”
29

ing in 1974. This is best reflected in its vision: “SHPE is the leading social-technical organization 

whose primary function is to enhance and achieve the potential of Hispanics in engineering, math 

and science.” More recently, SHPE has expanded its work to develop educational enrichment 

and academic outreach initiatives for Latinos, from the middle school and pre-college levels to 

the PhD levels.

The Society of Mexican American Engineers and Scientists (MAES), was founded in 1974 to promote excellence in engineering, science and mathematics while cultivating the value of cultural 

diversity among Latino youths. It has student and professional chapters in various cities throughout the U. S. In conducting its outreach activities, MAES members work directly with Hispanic 

youths in middle and high schools to promote student success, exposing them to technical career 

opportunities and preparing them to study in the field. It has student chapters in colleges and high 

schools across the country.

The mission of the Society for Advancement of Chicanos and Native Americans in Science (SACNAS) is to encourage Chicano-Latino and Native American students to pursue graduate education and obtain the advanced degrees necessary for science research, leadership and teaching 

careers at all levels. For over 30 years, SACNAS has provided national leadership in: improving 

and expanding opportunities for minorities in the scientific workforce and academia; mentoring 

college students within science, mathematics and engineering; and supporting quality pre-college 

science education. 

These same groups—SHPE, MAES and SACNAS—have been in discussions with the California 

State University System to form a partnership that leads to increased enrollment of Latino students in the STEM disciplines. They are also engaged in national discussions with several federal 

agencies to place Hispanic STEM professionals in career positions. In January 2008, these three 

organizations held a joint board meeting at which they mapped out plans to focus their combined 

efforts in increasing the supply of Hispanic talent in the STEM fields.

The Corporate and Private Sectors

Due to the corporate sector’s interest in seeking skilled human resources and expanding its research and development to remain competitive and bring new products to market, corporations, 

particularly in the high-tech sector, represent important stakeholders. Many are partnering with 

the Hispanic STEM associations cited above and are funding innovative programs designed to 

prepare youths to take and train educators to lead advanced placement courses, especially in 

mathematics and science. The National Math and Science Initiative and the College Board represent efforts to work with states and education-focused organizations that are providing low-income schools and school districts with the rigorous course work that Hispanic students need to 

enroll and persist in, and ultimately graduate from, colleges and universities across the country.

Parent and Family Involvement

As children’s first teachers, parents and families also have a critical role to play in helping to shape 

. Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers (SHPE) vision available under “About SHPE” and “Commitment” located 

at http://oneshpe.shpe.org/wps/portal/national (last accessed Feb. 6, 2008).
30

the next generation of college graduates and skilled workers. Families represent a significant resource in the Hispanic community and have for generations. Although families take an active 

role in caring for one another and providing financial and emotional support to members, many 

families do not always know how to navigate the education system. By working with a network of 

stakeholders, the White House Initiative has sought to provide these families with the knowledge, 

information and resources they need to become strong advocates for their children’s education. 

Organizations such as the Parent Institute for a Quality Education (PIQE) and the Hispanic Council for Reform and Education Options (Hispanic CREO) are training and engaging Hispanic parents to be active partners in their children’s education. Founded in 1987 in San Diego, PIQE is 

now a statewide organization that brings families, schools, community and businesses together 

as partners in the education of every child. Over 375,000 parents have graduated from PIQE’s 

nine-week parent involvement training classes that are based in 1,500 elementary, middle and 

high schools in districts throughout the state of California.13

Hispanic CREO was founded in 2001 to address the crisis in Latino education by empowering 

Latino families with parental choice in education. By creating coalitions with parents, schools, 

faith-based organizations, advocates and like-minded groups, Hispanic CREO has been able to 

educate, inform and mobilize Latino parents on the issues surrounding school choice. The organization, based in Washington, D.C., operates in Colorado, Arizona, Florida, New Jersey and 

Texas. 

Other examples of parental involvement efforts with which the White House Initiative worked include ENgaging LAtino Communities for Education (ENLACE) New Mexico, Albuquerque, N.M.; 

the National Center for Family Literacy, Louisville, Ky.; and Families in Schools, Los Angeles Unified School District.

Existing Assets in the U.S.

These are just some of the community’s assets—stakeholders with the experience, commitment 

and vested interest to improve education outcomes for Hispanic children and youths. They comprise early childhood development programs, the Hispanic faith-based community, Hispanic serving institutions of higher education, K-12 public schools, Hispanic STEM associations, the private 

sector, and the enduring values and strengths inherent in the Hispanic family. These are all important assets from which the nation can draw to improve Hispanic academic achievement. And, 

because no one entity can do it alone, many of these stakeholders understand that they must 

collaborate to maximize their efforts.

By working together, these organizations can help children start school ready to read and ready 

to learn from the moment they enter their first classroom. They can reach parents, families, and 

children among the congregations they seek to help and support. They can help prepare, retain, and graduate more Hispanic students from institutions of higher education. They can help 

prepare more qualified teachers, especially in mathematics and science. They can form more 

partnerships with public schools and community colleges. They can build more alliances with the 

business community and Hispanic STEM organizations and associations. They can also combine 

13 Data taken from the Parent Institute for a Quality Education (PIQE) Web site, available at http://www.piqe.org/ (accessed Feb. 6, 2008).
31

their efforts to work closely with key federal agencies to advance the nation’s supply of human 

talent and innovative research.

They can do all this—not just because it is good for the Hispanic community, but because these 

efforts will go far in ensuring the prosperity of the nation for generations to come.
32
33

Channels of Communication

One of the underpinnings of improving education outcomes for Hispanic students is raising awareness among parents, families and communities about education options and opportunities. Raising expectations begins with having an understanding that Hispanic children can indeed perform 

at the highest academic levels, provided we know how to help them get there. From the very 

outset, the White House Initiative employed several channels of communication to reach Hispanic 

students, families, educators and organizations that sought to improve academic achievement. 

Recommendation: Set new and high expectations across America for 

Hispanic American children by: helping parents navigate the educational 

system, creating partnerships that can provide expanded options for children, and implementing a nationwide public awareness and motivation 

campaign aimed at increasing educational attainment and achieving the 

goal of a college education. 

YesICan.Gov

In July 2002, the White House Initiative launched its Web site, http://www.yesican.gov, and its 

Spanish-language counterpart, http://www.yosipuedo.gov, to provide community leaders, educators and Hispanic parents with quality education resources.

Developed in collaboration with strategic partners, the site contained more than 400 pages of 

information that covered topics such as: financial aid; college preparation; English Language 

Learners; early reading and language development; homework tips for parents; No Child Left 

Behind; and more.

As the work of the White House Initiative evolved and the demand for more Hispanic educationrelated information increased, the White House Initiative reorganized its existing Web site in early 

2007 to provide visitors with even more resources. 

Electronic Messaging to Partners

In 2005, shortly after the launch of the Partnership for Hispanic Family Learning, the White House 

Initiative increased its communication to constituents by electronically disseminating biweekly 

news clips to more than 300 partner organizations. The news clips relayed the most up-to-date 

information on issues affecting the Hispanic community in the United States. 

In mid-2007, the format for news clips was changed to a more comprehensive weekly electronic newsletter. In addition to news clips, the newsletter now contains special announcements, a 

weekly message from the executive director, and information about: bilingual education publica-
34

tions; scholarships, grants and other funding opportunities; internship and fellowship opportunities; and new partners.14

Conferences, Speaking Engagements and Other Outreach

Other avenues through which the White House Initiative reached out to Hispanic parents, families 

and communities included speaking engagements and exhibits at regional and national Hispanic 

and education forums, roundtable discussions and conferences. 

White House Initiative staff have been presenters, keynote speakers and panelists at more than 

150 events across the country since 2001, delivering messages to attendees on a range of education issues including NCLB, academic preparation, and the importance of parental and family 

involvement, among others. 

Moreover, staff attended and exhibited at more than 50 conferences annually, ensuring a federal 

education presence at the events and forging partnerships with key Hispanic-Serving Institutions, organizations and advocacy groups. Many of these conferences had an attendance in the 

thousands, which included not only members of the organization hosting the event, but also parents, educators, administrators and the general public. Several outstanding events experienced 

attendance in record numbers, such as the annual HESTEC Week, organized by the University 

of Texas Pan American (UTPA) in McAllen, Texas, which typically attracts thousands of UTPA 

students, families and community members. In fact, UTPA’s 2007 HESTEC Week received more 

than 85,000 attendees in a six-hour period.15 During that time, the White House Initiative staff 

disseminated approximately 16,000 publications and other education resources.

The White House Initiative’s outreach efforts to the Hispanic community in the U.S. since 2001 

have included school visits and tours to universities and public and private elementary and high 

schools in Alaska, Arizona, California, Nevada, New Mexico and Texas, among other states. 

These tours were intended to heighten public awareness of the White House Initiative and its 

work in education reform for Hispanic students.

14 A financial aid resource that has been highlighted in the weekly e-newsletter is Student Aid on the Web (Ayuda Estudiantil en la Web), managed by Federal Student Aid—a one-stop online resource from the U.S. Department of Education 

on preparing for and funding education beyond high school. The site is available at http://studentaid.ed.gov/PORTALSWebApp/students/english/index.jsp (accessed July 23, 2008).

15 2007 HESTEC Week data from “About Us,” “HESTEC Facts” and “HESTEC Demographics,” located on the HESTEC 

Week Web site, available at http://www.hestec.org/about.cfm (accessed Feb. 6, 2008).
35

Media Exposure Resulting From Public Awareness Efforts

Since its inception, the White House Initiative has employed a variety of 

methods to promote education awareness among Hispanic Americans. 

Among the methods used was the broadcasting of 30-second public service announcements on early childhood cognitive development and learning via local and national Spanish- and English-language radio and television stations and networks. Other methods included the broadcasting of 

interviews with White House Initiative senior officers and news briefs on 

White House Initiative-sponsored events. This media exposure has served 

to increase awareness among the public—particularly the office’s target 

audience of 6 million Hispanic households with school-age children—of 

the volume and variety of education-related information available, thereby 

enabling Hispanic parents, families and communities to make quality decisions regarding their children’s academic success. 

Publications

During the course of its work, the White House Initiative has sought ways to place useful, practical 

education information—particularly in the form of publications—in the hands of Hispanic parents 

and families throughout the country. Through the assistance of the Department’s publications 

distribution center ED Pubs, this information has reached communities and schools directly and 

free of charge. The White House Initiative leveraged this distribution method by expanding the 

avenues through which publications were distributed, often through organizations that serve Hispanic families and communities. Moreover, the White House Initiative made available a range 

of bilingual education publications produced by the White House Initiative and ED that could be 

useful and practical for Hispanic parents and families. 

I

n addition to the Tool Kit for Hispanic Families, the following represent 

the most popular publications distributed by the White House Initiative at 

events nationwide.

Que se abran las puertas: Opciones de tecnología y comunicación 

para los niños con pérdida auditiva

Opening Doors: Technology and Communication Options for Children With 

Hearing Loss

Que Ningún Niño Se Quede Atrás: Lo que los padres necesitan 

saber

No Child Left Behind: What Parents Need to Know
36

La libreta de calificaciones del país: guía de la NAEP para los padres 

de familia

The Nation’s Report Card: Parent’s Guide

La libre elección de escuela para el éxito escolar

School Choice for Student Success

Cómo presentar una reclamación por discriminación ante la oficina 

para derechos civiles

 How to File a Discrimination Complaint With the Office for Civil Rights

Preparación para la educación postsecundaria para los estudiantes 

con discapacidades: Conozca sus derechos y responsabilidades

Students With Disabilities: Preparing for Postsecondary Education: Know 

Your Rights and Responsibilities

Guía de recursos para las familias hispanas

A Guide to the Tool Kit for Hispanic Families

Buen comienzo, buen futuro

Healthy Start, Grow Smart

Cómo ayudar a su hijo con las matemáticas

Helping Your Child Learn Mathematics

Cómo ayudar a su hijo a aprender ciencias

Helping Your Child Learn Science

Cómo ayudar a su hijo a ser un buen lector

Helping Your Child Become a Reader

Cómo ayudar a su hijo con la tarea escolar

Helping Your Child With Homework

Cómo ayudar a su hijo durante la edad preescolar

Helping Your Preschool Child

Cómo ayudar a su hijo a tener éxito en la escuela

Helping Your Child Succeed in School

Cómo ayudar a su hijo durante los primeros años de adolescencia

Helping Your Child Through Early Adolescence

Cómo ayudar a su hijo a ser un ciudadano responsable

Helping Your Child Become a Responsible Citizen
37

La selección de una escuela para su hijo

Choosing a School for Your Child

Preguntas que hacen los padres sobre las escuelas

Questions Parents Ask About Schools

Consejos para los padres sobre cómo mantener a los hijos libres de 

la droga

Tips for Parents on Keeping Children Drug-Free

Consejos para los tutores en lectura

Tips for Reading Tutors

Consejos prácticos para los padres sobre la lectura 

Reading Tips for Parents

Que Ningún Niño Se Quede Atrás: Una guía para los padres

No Child Left Behind: A Parents Guide

Servicios educativos suplementarios: referencia rápida para padres

Supplemental Services: Quick Reference for Parents

Guía del maestro: consejos para los padres sobre la tarea escolar

A Teacher’s Guide to Homework Tips

Una guía para leer

A Guide to Reading

Una guía para los padres: ¿cómo puedo reconocer un buen 

programa de lectura para la primera enseñanza? 

Guide for Parents: How Do I Know a Good Early Reading Program When 

I See One?

Fundamentos sobre los préstamos directos: guía para padres

Direct Loan Basics for Parents

Guía para estudiantes

Student Guide 

Solicitud gratuita de Ayuda Federal para Estudiantes

Free Application for Federal Student Aid

Cómo pagar tu educación

Funding Your Education 
38

During the five-year period, 2003–07, the White House Initiative coordinated the distribution of 

more than 600,000 publications at a variety of events, meetings, and functions and to a range of 

public and private organizations. More specifically, these publications were distributed to more 

than 500 entities, including a wide range of schools and school districts, community, nonprofit and 

faith-based organizations, businesses, and institutions of higher education, among others. 

The overall trend of the distribution of materials between 2003 and 2007 is one of reaching an 

increasing audience. This increase corresponded to activities and events of the White House Initiative. By far, more publications were distributed in connection with the Partnership for Hispanic 

Family Learning than at any other time or through any other medium. 

Tool Kit for Hispanic Families and A Guide for Reading

Two publications accounted for more than half of the publications that were disseminated through 

the White House Initiative. The most widely distributed publication was the Tool Kit for Hispanic 

Families and the brochure A Guide for Reading: How Parents Can Help Their Children Be Ready 

to Read and Ready to Learn. The Guide for Reading is a product of the White House Initiative, 

while the Tool Kit was produced by the U.S. Department of Education and developed with guidance from more than 1,800 Hispanic parents at Parent Information and Resource Centers nationwide. It is this publication that proved to be especially popular with Hispanic families. 

The Tool Kit for Hispanic Families (Guía de recursos para las familias hispanas) includes several bilingual publications designed to inform 

parents of their rights under NCLB and assist them in raising academically 

successful children. These publications are:

• Tips for Helping Children Learn to Read

Consejos para ayudar a los niños a aprender a leer

• School Success for Your Child

Éxito en la escuela para su niño

• You and Your Preschool Child

Usted y su niño en edad preescolar

• You and Your Elementary School-Aged Child

Usted y su hijo en edad de escuela primaria

• A Challenging High School Education for All

Una estimulate educación secundaria para todos

• No Child Left Behind: Help for Students and Their Families

Que Ningún Niño Se Quede Atrás: Ayuda para los estudiantes y sus 

familias
39

While other program offices at ED also contributed to the wide dissemination of the Tool Kit, the White House Initiative made a concerted effort 

to ensure its promotion and distribution among organizations serving Hispanic children and families in communities across the country. More than 

three-quarters of all tool kits were distributed to community-based and nonprofit organizations, including faith-based (56 percent) organizations and 

schools and school districts (22.5 percent).16 

After the second reprint of the Tool Kit, orders began to outpace the available inventory—so much 

so, that limits had to be placed on the number requestors could order.17 The demand and need 

for educational publications and materials like the Tool Kit illustrate the enormous interest in and 

demand for information by families who wish to fulfill the aspirations they have for their children’s 

academic success.

16 Data from the White House Initiative on Educational Excellence for Hispanic Americans’ publications and partnersto-date databases, 2001–08.

17 A limited number of copies of the Tool Kit may be ordered by calling ED Pubs, the U.S. Department of Education’s 

publications warehouse at 1-877-4ED-PUBS (en español 1-877-433-7827) or by visiting the ED Pubs Web site, available at http://www.edpubs.ed.gov (accessed July 23, 2008).
40
41

Education Reform and Hispanic 

Education Attainment

This report chronicles the accomplishments of the White House Initiative that began with President 

Bush’s blueprint for education reform in 2001. It has covered the White House Initiative’s work on: 

the six recommendations submitted to the president by the President’s Advisory Commission on 

Educational Excellence for Hispanic Americans; the Partnership for Hispanic Family Learning; the 

extensive outreach activities conducted over a two-term period; the wide dissemination of education information and publications; collaboration with other federal agencies, particularly pertaining 

to STEM education for Hispanics; and recognition of the assets and resources that a range of 

stakeholders represent in the Hispanic community.

The Impact of No Child Left Behind

Because education reform as embodied in No Child Left Behind has been one of President Bush’s 

top domestic priorities, its support and implementation governed much of the White House Initiative’s activities covered in this report. 

Prior to NCLB, discussions about improving education outcomes for Hispanic Americans in the 

general community typically began with the premise that reducing the Hispanic dropout rate would 

close the achievement gap. These discussions devoted little attention to the underlying reasons 

why Hispanic students were dropping out. A host of others viewed the problem in the aggregate 

without distinguishing between the education needs and experiences of a growing, diverse population—that is, taking into account the diverse education needs of native-born versus foreign-born 

students, English speakers versus those with limited English proficiency, and the varying education experiences of Hispanic subgroups. Many more simply expressed dismay over the state of 

Hispanic education and suggested that the only solution was to devote more funding to address 

the problem. 

Until the passage of NCLB, the state of Hispanic education had changed very little. It was not 

surprising then that the chief recommendation of the President’s Advisory Commission was one 

that called for the full implementation and rigorous enforcement of No Child Left Behind, which 

was passed by a strong bipartisan majority in Congress. NCLB represented the most significant 

educational reform in more than 40 years and the greatest opportunity to finally transform the 

state of Hispanic education in America. 

An important element of NCLB was the provision calling for the dissagregation of student academic performance data. This provision alone changed the education landscape for thousands 

of Hispanic children whose academic fates had been lost in the overall averages of school performance. 

The transformation began even as dramatic shifts in the enrollment of Hispanic students were 

taking place in our nation’s public schools. In the 2004–05 school year, there were approximately 

50 million students enrolled in the U.S. public school system. Hispanic students represented 19 

percent of this total, or more than 9 million students—a percentage that increased from 13 percent 
42

in 1994. Over the same period, the enrollment of white students declined both in actual numbers 

and as a percentage of total enrollment, and the enrollment of black and Asian students grew 

by less than 1 percent each (U.S. Department of Education 2006). Clearly, Hispanic students 

were the fastest-growing segment of public school enrollment during that 10-year period, and this 

growth is likely to continue in the future. 

That growth has been accompanied with some promising results for Hispanic education attainment. Since the passage of NCLB, disaggregated data on Hispanic and limited English proficient 

(LEP) students has been available at the school, district and state levels. These data show how 

these subgroups are performing. While the unique characteristics of each state’s assessment 

system make cross-state comparisons inappropriate, the National Assessment of Educational 

1977 1980 1983 1986 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004

YEAR

White

Black

Hispanic

270

250

230

210

190

170

150

Figure 2. National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) trends in

 mathematics scale scores and score gaps for white, black and

 Hispanic students age 9: 1978–2004

Source: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of 

Educational Progress (NAEP), NAEP 2004 Trends in Academic Progress. SCORE
43

Progress (NAEP),18 often referred to as the Nation’s Report Card, does permit such comparisons 

and provides a view of national trends of Hispanic student progress (National Center for Education Statistics 2006).

The latest results of the NAEP long-term trend assessments indicate that Hispanic 9-year-olds 

are reading and doing mathematics at the highest levels since results on the assessments were 

first reported for Hispanic students in 1975 (see figures 2 and 3, respectively). In fact, test scores 

dramatically increased for both assessments between 1999 and 2004. This progress, in part, can 

be attributed to NCLB.

On the other hand, while the results were also positive for 13-year-olds in mathematics, they were 

not in reading (fig. 3). This is an area where there is clearly more work to be done.

The Importance of Academic Preparation

As with all students, Hispanics need the academic preparation and high expectations that highly 

qualified teachers can provide to help them meet the demands of a knowledge-based global 

economy. However, they also face some added constraints. Foremost among these is the language barrier. Approximately 4 million of the 9 million Hispanic students in the U.S. are English 

language learners.19

Further, nearly half of all Hispanic students attend school in a district that has more than 50 percent Hispanic student enrollment. These students are enrolled in only about 1,000 of the 15,000 

school districts in the U.S. These 1,000 districts are located, for the most part, in 11 states: Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, 

Texas and Washington. This means that we can look to these districts in these states to see how 

a sizable segment of the Hispanic student population is being educated.

But the good news is ... that because of high standards and 

accountability throughout this country, the achievement gap is closing. 

... If we didn’t measure, we wouldn’t know, we’d be just guessing, 

and it’s not worthwhile to guess when a child’s future is at stake. ... 

[T]he world is too competitive to have a lax system in place. And we 

don’t now, with No Child Left Behind.

— President George W. Bush

Remarks on NCLB, Horace Greeley Elementary School, Chicago

Jan. 7, 2008

18 The NAEP consists of assessments conducted periodically in mathematics, reading, science, writing, the arts, civics, economics, geography, and U.S. history given to students in every state at various intervals. The NAEP national 

assessments in mathematics and reading are given to 4th-, 8th- and 12th-graders every two years, while the NAEP 

long-term trend assessments in mathematics and reading are given to 9-year-olds, 13-year-olds and 17-year-olds 

every four years.

19 Data from U.S. Department of Education Consolidated State Performance Reports, 2004–07, available at 

http://www.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/consolidated/index.html (accessed Feb. 6, 2008).
44

A comparison of state NAEP scores suggests that the states that were pioneers in standards and 

accountability, such as Massachusetts (fig. 3), Florida (fig. 4) and Texas (fig. 5), produced higher 

test scores and the most progress in closing the achievement gap. Going forward, the practices in 

these states will be important factors in determining best practices for improving overall Hispanic 

academic achievement.

230

220

210

200

190

180

170

1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999 2004

SCORE

Figure 3. NAEP trends in reading scale scores and score gaps for white, 

 black and Hispanic students age 9: 1975–2004

Source: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of 

Educational Progress (NAEP), NAEP 2004 Trends in Academic Progress.

YEAR

White

Black

Hispanic

As figures 4–6 illustrate, real progress is being made, particularly in the early grades. However, 

much more work remains to be done, particularly at the high school level and in the core subject 

areas of mathematics and science. 

High School Dropouts

The high Hispanic high school dropout rate has persisted for far too long. Research, surveys and 

study after study have shown that Hispanic students fail to complete high school at rates persis-
45

tently higher than their non-Hispanic peers. Conversely, while the graduation rate was 78 percent 

for white students and 56 percent for black students in 2002, the graduation rate for Hispanic 

students was only 52 percent (Green and Winters 2005). 

The reasons for this are known: Hispanic students are entering high school reading below grade 

level; many are not academically prepared in the core subject areas of mathematics and science; 

and even more have little or no access to highly qualified teachers. In addition, many recent immigrant youths enter U.S. schools at a late age and may have had little or no formal education (or 

had a formal education of poor quality) in their home countries. Regardless of the circumstances, 

the consequences for families, communities, and the nation from the lost talent that high school 

dropouts represent is proving to be too costly, even more so when these dropouts become recruits for gangs, wards of the state, or relegated to the most menial and low-paying jobs.

However, the White House Initiative has been encouraged with recent developments among a 

range of organizations that have stepped forward to address the exceedingly high rate of high 

school dropouts in communities nationwide. America’s Promise Alliance, for one, has marshaled 

350

325

300

275

250

225

200

175

150

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 

SCORE

YEAR

All Students

White Students

Hispanic Students

ELL Students

Source: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment 

of Educational Progress (NAEP), NAEP Data Explorer, available at 

http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/nde/ (accessed Aug. 6, 2008).

Figure 4. NAEP trends in mathematics scale scores and score gaps for white, 

 Hispanic and English Language Learners (ELL) eighth-graders 

 attending Massachusetts schools: 2000–07
46

its partners to implement an ambitious five-year plan to address the high school dropout crisis. 

As part of this plan, America’s Promise Alliance will sponsor leadership summits over a two-year 

period in all 50 states and in at least 50 cities by enlisting leaders from all sectors of the community to develop specific plans that strengthen schools and provide youths the “wraparound supports they need.” America’s Promise Alliance’s five-year goal is to improve the lives of 15 million 

disadvantaged young people. The White House Initiative is committed to working closely with 

America’s Promise Alliance to support this far-reaching goal.

The Hispanic faith-based community has also undertaken the Hispanic high school dropout issue 

head on. Hispanic faith-based organizations are mobilizing their networks of churches throughout 

the country and key stakeholders to tackle the Hispanic high school dropout problem at its source 

in local communities. As part of this effort, pastors and church leaders will engage and collaborate 

with city, school and community leaders to develop strategic ways to work with Hispanic youths 

at risk of dropping out of school. They will employ proven methods that provide Latino students 

the academic support and rigor needed to graduate from high school and prepare them for the 

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 

SCORE

YEAR

280

260

240

220

200

180

160

All Students

White Students

Hispanic Students

ELL Students

Source: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment 

of Educational Progress (NAEP), NAEP Data Explorer, available at 

http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/nde/ (accessed Aug. 6, 2008).

Figure 5. NAEP tends in reading scale scores and score gaps for white, Hispanic 

 and ELL fourth-graders attending Florida schools: 1998–2007
47

workforce or a postsecondary education. Hispanic faith-based leaders and stakeholder partners 

will advocate for effective after-school programs, caring mentors and alternative schools that will 

provide students the preparation and motivation they need to succeed academically. The White 

House Initiative will collaborate with the Hispanic faith-based community to implement the Hispanic high school dropout prevention initiative.

It is anticipated that America’s Promise and Hispanic faith-based leaders will combine their efforts 

to maximize their effectiveness and reach when it comes to reducing high school dropouts in the 

Hispanic community. The White House Initiative will also draw on its national network of partners 

to support these efforts. This Hispanic high school dropout prevention partnership will also enlist 

the education resources and staff expertise of the U.S. Department of Education to sustain and 

support this national initiative. Model charter schools, high-performing Hispanic-serving schools 

and school districts, Parent Information Resource Centers (PIRCs), English- and Spanish-language publications about parental and family options, and financial aid information represent 

important assets that the Department will supply to support this national effort.

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 

SCORE

YEAR

280

260

240

220

200

180

160

All Students

White Students

Hispanic Students

ELL Students

Figure 6. NAEP trends in mathematics scale scores and score gaps for white, 

 Hispanic and ELL fourth-graders attending Texas schools: 2000–07

Source: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment 

of Educational Progress (NAEP), NAEP Data Explorer, available at 

http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/nde/ (accessed Aug. 6, 2008).
48

But we cannot stop there, particularly when 90 percent of jobs in the future will require an education beyond high school.20 Even among the Hispanic students who do complete high school, 

fewer than half pursue a postsecondary education. Of those who do enroll in a college or university, many find themselves taking remedial courses because they did not receive the necessary 

academic preparation in high school to undertake the rigors of a college education. Clearly then, 

high school graduation and academic preparation are key to embarking on a successful path to 

gainful employment or postsecondary degree attainment. 

With regard to challenging course work, a recent report by the College Board indicates that Hispanic students are taking AP exams in increasing numbers (College Board 2007). In 2007, the 

long-standing nationwide gap between Hispanic high school students eligible to take AP exams 

(14.6 percent) and Hispanic high school students who took AP exams (14 percent) has narrowed dramatically. Florida has again been a standout in this regard. Although Hispanic students 

comprised 20.7 percent of students eligible to take AP exams, more than 24 percent of Hispanic 

students took AP exams (College Board 2007). Maintaining this equity is critical to improving 

secondary education outcomes for Hispanic students.

Therefore, closing the achievement gap and increasing the education attainment of Hispanic 

students will require:

 

1. Early childhood cognitive development;

2. Early reading skills;

3. Parental and family involvement;

4. High expectations;

5. Highly qualified teachers and high-quality instruction, especially in mathematics and 

science; 

6. Rigorous academic preparation, especially in the core subject areas of mathematics 

and science; and

7. Accountability.

All of these are key elements of NCLB. 

20 The estimate of the percentage of the fastest-growing jobs that will require postsecondary education is from remarks 

by U.S. Secretary of Labor Elaine L. Chao, on Feb. 22, 2006, at the WIRED Initiative Town Hall Event in Washington, 

D.C.
49

But some bright lines must be drawn. Annual assessments are nonnegotiable, because what gets measured gets done. This is the heart 

of accountability. The data must also be reported by student groups—

African-Americans, Hispanics, those with special needs—so that 

those who need the most help aren’t hidden behind state[wide] or 

districtwide averages.

— Secretary Margaret Spellings

“Our High Schools Need Help,” The Washington Post

April 2, 2005

Helping Schools, Districts and States Meet NCLB Standards

Within this framework of education reform, states have been granted expanded flexibility and 

support to build on the progress of No Child Left Behind. These have come in the form of policy 

initiatives from the U.S. Department of Education.

Growth Models

Growth models allow states to receive credit for improving individual students’ performance over 

time but retain the NCLB principles of annual assessment, disaggregation of data, and gradelevel proficiency for all students by 2014. To date, 11 states have been approved to implement 

their models under a pilot program established in November 2005. Based on the promising results 

of the pilot, ED has opened eligibility to all qualified states. 

School Improvement Grants

The U.S. Department of Education awarded a total of $125 million in School Improvement grants 

in FY 2008 (U.S. Department of Education 2007). Another $491 million will be awarded later this 

year. These grants assist states in taking a greater role in developing and delivering comprehensive leadership and technical assistance to help address problems and reform schools that are 

not making adequate yearly progress. In addition, the grants will help states and districts fulfill 

their responsibilities to ensure that all students are reading and doing math on grade level by 

2014. 

LEP Partnership

The Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Partnership is a U.S. Department of Education initiative 

designed to improve English language proficiency, reading and mathematics assessments for 

LEP students. In December 2007, states were invited to undertake an independent and voluntary 

self-directed review of their state’s English-language proficiency standards and assessments. 

The purpose of engaging states in this process is to enlist their help in developing high-quality 

assessments tailored to meet the academic needs of LEP students.
50

Expanding Options and Choices for Parents and Families

President Bush has proposed helping more students take advantage of NCLB’s free tutoring by 

ensuring that school districts notify parents when their children are eligible to receive such services and by requiring those districts to use the full federal funds set aside for tutoring and school 

choice. Combined with parental involvement activities, providing timely information about these 

options and choices will empower parents and families to make informed decisions about their 

children’s education.

The Future of No Child Left Behind

In early 2008, Secretary Margaret Spellings proposed new regulations to 

strengthen and clarify No Child Left Behind (NCLB) for Title I and Title III 

schools.21 These regulations build on NCLB’s positive results and adhere 

to the law’s core principles of testing annually, publishing data and helping 

schools that fall behind. 

Proposed Regulations for Title I 

The proposed regulations for Title I focused on improved accountability and 

transparency, uniform and disaggregated graduation rates, and improved 

parental notification regarding supplemental education services and public 

school choice. This information is vital to empower Hispanic parents to 

make informed decisions about their children’s education. It also helps 

states and districts implement NCLB provisions that affect thousands of 

students nationwide, including the more than 9 million Hispanic students in 

the public school system. 

Assessment, Accountability, and Transparency

The proposed regulations clarified elements of the law requiring school 

systems to be accountable for results and requiring transparency in their 

reporting to parents and the public. In particular, the proposed regulations 

explained that measures of student academic achievement within a subject area may include multiple types of questions (e.g., multiple choice or 

extended response) and multiple assessments (e.g., reading and writing 

assessment to measure reading and language arts). They also require 

states to publish data from the Nation’s Report Card alongside data from 

the states’ own test results to provide greater transparency about a state’s 

standards and assessments as they compare to other states nationwide. 

21 Title I schools are those schools with a high number of students on free or reduced-price 

lunches. Title III funds are distributed to states based on a formula that takes into account 

the number of immigrant and LEP students in each state.
51

Furthermore, a state’s accountability system in reporting these academic 

assessments must ensure inclusion of all subgroups of students, such as 

Hispanics and English language learners.22

As a result of the Department’s growth model pilot program, the proposed 

regulations also outlined criteria that states must meet to incorporate individual student progress into a state’s definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for academic achievement. If a state fails to meet the AYP for 

a given year, it will be deemed to be “in need of improvement.” If the same 

school fails to meet AYP for two consecutive years, then parents may take 

advantage of public school choice options (i.e., sending their children to 

another school within the district) as well as supplemental educational services (SES), such as tutoring. 

With regard to accountability, the regulations strengthened the provisions 

of the law in this area by requiring restructuring interventions to be more 

rigorous and address the reasons behind the school’s performance. For 

example, in restructuring a school the district may replace the principal under NCLB guidelines; however, replacing the principal alone would not be 

sufficient to constitute proper restructuring. 

Finally, in light of the more technical needs of the states, the Department 

proposed the creation of a National Technical Advisory Council. The council will include experts in the fields of education standards, accountability 

systems, statistics and psychometrics. These individuals will be charged 

with advising the Department on highly complex and technical issues to ensure state standards and assessments are of the highest technical quality.

Uniform and Disaggregated Graduation Rates

Under the proposed regulations, not only will states be required to set a 

graduation rate goal, but by school year 2012–13 states will be required to 

disaggregate the data by subgroups at the school and district levels. With 

Hispanics representing about 20 percent of public school enrollment and 

graduating at a rate of 64.4 percent, a uniform graduate rate among all 

states is necessary to evaluate progress within the Hispanic community. 

Thanks to the work of the National Governor’s Association (NGA), the pro22 To ensure accuracy and avoid distortions when the number of students in a category is 

insufficient to yield statistically reliable information the law permits states to set a minimum 

number in defining a student subgroup, called an “N-size.” However, there are many students and subgroups of students whose achievement data are excluded from the adequate 

yearly progress (AYP) in light of large minimum subgroup sizes, the “N-size.” The proposed 

regulations require states to ensure the maximum number of students and subgroups are 

included in AYP determinations and they must include the number and percent of students 

and subgroups excluded from school-level accountability determinations in their accountability workbooks.
52

posed regulations would require that all states use the uniform graduate 

rate agreed to by the NGA to show how many incoming freshman in a given 

high school graduate within four years. This formula will more accurately 

calculate how many students graduate from high school on time and how 

many drop out.23 Moreover, this data will be made public so that educators 

and parents can compare how students of every race, background and 

income level are performing. 

Improved Parental Notification

Several of the proposed regulations in Title I serve to inform parents about 

the education opportunities for students located within districts classified as 

“in need of improvement.” When a school fails to meet AYP, the proposed 

regulations required school districts to notify parents in a clear and timely 

manner about their public school choice and SES options. Specifically, 

states will need to make more information available to the public about 

available tutoring providers, including information on the district’s Web site 

regarding the number of students who were eligible for and who participated in SES. The Web site also will list approved supplemental educational 

services providers and their locations. 

This information will be clearly distinguishable from other information sent 

to parents notifying them that their child’s school is in improvement status. States also will be required to develop, implement and publicly report 

the standards and techniques they use to monitor how districts implement 

SES requirements. Most importantly, information will be provided to parents about the effectiveness of services with regard to helping students improve. School districts must notify parents of their available options as far 

in advance as possible and no later than 14 days before the start of school. 

In this way, parents will have adequate time to exercise their school choice 

option by sending their children to a better performing school within the 

district before the school year begins. 

Proposed Regulations for Title III

NCLB, for the first time, required states to implement: English language 

proficiency (ELP) standards aligned with the state academic content and 

student academic achievement standards in English language arts and 

23 States will be allowed to use an interim calculation on a transitional basis, but every 

high school in every state will be required to report new graduation rates for accountability 

purposes no later than 2013. In the meantime, each state will be responsible for setting a 

graduation rate goal and for disaggregating data by subgroup to report and determine AYP. 

Beginning in the 2008–09 academic year, in order to make AYP, a school or district would 

have to meet the graduation goal or demonstrate their continuous and substantial improvement from the prior year
53

reading and mathematics; ELP assessments aligned to the ELP standards; and meaningful accountability to ensure that the more than 5 million limited English proficient (LEP) students in the nation’s public school 

system acquire the English skills they need to attain high levels of academic achievement and meet the same challenging state academic content and student achievement standards that all children in America are 

expected to meet. 

In keeping with this philosophy, the English language proficiency standards are based on four language domains: speaking, listening, reading 

and writing. Each state must administer annually to students valid and 

reliable assessments that provide for the evaluation of LEP students’ proficiency levels in all four domains and comprehension in English. In addition, 

states must set annual measurable achievement objectives (AMAOs)24 to 

be met by school districts and states.25 States will then determine if the 

school districts are meeting those targets. 

The proposed regulations for Title III provided interpretations regarding 

the administration of English language proficiency assessments, the implementation of annual measurable achievement objectives, and state 

and local implementation of Title III accountability.

Assessments for AMAO 1 and 2

States are required to develop AMAOs that include annual increases or 

a percentage of LEP students making progress in learning English, as 

well as students attaining English proficiency by the end of each school 

year. The proposed regulations clarified that in assessing achievement for 

“progress” AMAO 1 in English, states will be able to base their student performance and accountability target on assessment results derived from 

either separate student performance levels or scores in each of the language domains; or a composite score of all domains. In addition, a state 

may determine AMAO 1 targets based on progress in one or more of the 

language domains. 

The regulations explained that given the nature of language acquisition, 

24 An annual measurable achievement objective (AMAO) is a performance objective, or 

target, for English language learners that local education agencies (LEAs) that receive 

Title IIII subgrants must meet each year. All LEAs receiving a Title III subgrant are required 

to meet the two English language proficiency AMAOs and a third academic achievement 

AMAO based on AYP information. AMAOs are divided into three groups: AMAO 1, LEP 

students making progress in English proficiency; AMAO 2, LEP students attaining English 

proficiency; and AMAO 3, the adequate yearly progress for the LEP subgroup. 

25 In this section, school districts refers to all subgrantees under Title III, which include 

LEAs, groups of LEAs and consortias.
54

LEP students may make meaningful progress in learning English without 

necessarily making progress in each domain. Conversely, a LEP student 

who is deemed “proficient” in English must have acquired adequate skills 

in each of the language domains as grade level expectations become 

more challenging in order to succeed academically when the language of 

instruction is English. 

AMAO 2 is intended to be the completion point where students have 

achieved the skills in each of the language domains to be considered “proficient” in English. Attaining proficiency in each domain is a critical factor in 

assessing the curriculum and achieving high levels of academic proficiency. The proposed regulation clarifies that students must reach, and AMAO 

2 must reflect, a proficient level of performance in each of the domains. 

Accountability for LEP Students: Annual Measurable Achievement 

Objectives

The proposed regulations would require states to include all LEP students 

served by programs under Title III in all three AMAO targets, calculations 

and determinations. The Title III accountability provision (AMAO 1 and 2) 

applies to the states and subgrantees. The AMAOs are another accountability provision used to measure the progress of LEP students in English 

(AMAO 1) and attainment of English proficiency (AMAO 2) within a school 

district. The third AMAO (AMAO 3) is based on whether the LEP subgroup 

in the state and in its local education agencies (LEAs) under Title I make 

AYP in English language arts and reading and mathematics. AMAO 3 is 

calculated at the school, LEA and state levels. In light of the fact that some 

LEP students were being excluded from AMAO calculations, under the proposed regulations, states would be required to include all LEP students in 

their AMAO targets, determinations and calculations of whether a district 

has meet its AMAOs for that year. These regulations will ensure that all 

LEP students are accounted for by states and school districts regarding 

language proficiency and academic achievement. 

State and Local Implementation 

The proposed regulations also address state and local implementation of 

Title III provisions. For example, some states use certain criteria in addition 

to the annual ELP assessment to determine whether the subgrantee met 

AMAO 2 (“proficient”) for purposes of accountability under Title III; however, they then use different criteria to determine whether the student has 

achieved proficiency and is ready to exit the LEP program under Title I. 

The proposed regulations require states to utilize consistent criteria in the 
55

definition of English language proficiency for the purpose of setting AMAO 

2 targets and determining that students from the LEP subgroup no longer 

need services under Title III and are prepared to exit the LEP subgroup 

under Title I. States must define AMAO 2 criteria consistent with criteria 

to exit LEP status under Title I AYP. The proposed interpretations permit 

states to allow to apply minimum subgroup sizes to AMAOs under Title III 

that are consistent with the minimum size group policies that the state applies to the AYP LEP subgroup and that have Department approval.

If a school district fails to meet AMAOs for two consecutive years, under the 

proposed regulations, states will be required to have the districts develop 

an improvement plan. The plan must specifically address the factors that 

prevented the district from meeting its AMAOs. If the district fails for four 

consecutive years, the state will be required to take actions including, but 

not limited to, modifying the curriculum, program and method of instruction of the district, or by replacing educational personnel. Of most importance to parents, the proposed regulations detail the states’ responsibility 

to ensure that districts communicate with parents the results of AMAOs. 

Specifically, states will be required to notify the parents of LEP students 

each time a school district does not meet its AMAOs. With this information, 

parents of LEP students will be better equipped to address issues in their 

schools and demand accountability. 

At the time this publication was written, these proposed regulations were still out in the field for 

public comment. It was the Department’s intention to have the final regulations published by Nov. 1, 

2008. These proposed regulations and other policy initiatives will help states to ensure that students 

in low-performing schools will reach grade-level proficiency by 2014. 

It is critical that we reach these targets to ensure our children have the academic preparation they 

need to meet the demands of an increasingly competitive global economy. 

Future Promise

This emphasis on academic preparation, especially today, is well founded, because the world has 

changed. Immigrants to our nation at the turn of the previous century could enter the industrialbased economy with little or no education. If they had a strong back and a willingness to work they 

could continue to work in hourly wage jobs for years with limited English skills. 

We live in a knowledge-based economy—an economy that requires literacy, knowledge, skills 

and training to compete for today’s jobs. This means we must prepare our children to fill these 

jobs within one generation.
56

There is no better time than the present to reinforce the principles of education reform and the 

promise that NCLB holds for closing the academic achievement gap for Hispanic children. As 

educators, leaders, policymakers, parents, family members and concerned citizens, we must 

redouble our efforts to ensure that all of our children are reading and doing math at grade level. 

We, as a nation, cannot afford to expect anything less.
57

Conclusion

A system that doesn’t hold people to account assumes that certain 

children cannot learn, and that it’s acceptable to shuffle them through 

school. Well, that’s not acceptable in America, to shuffle children 

through school. That’s what I have called the soft bigotry of low 

expectations.

— President George W. Bush

Remarks on NCLB Reauthorization at the Waldorf=Astoria 

Sept. 26, 2007

In the six years since No Child Left Behind was passed by Congress, education reform has been 

a factor in improving education outcomes and closing the achievement gap for Hispanic students—a gap that has persisted for decades. It is also clear that this progress can be attributed 

in part to NCLB and the education reform that is taking place in classrooms across the country. 

This momentum is drawing energy from the involvement of Hispanic parents, families and communities. And more and more stakeholders are stepping up to do their part to contribute to this 

success. Now, more than ever before, closing the achievement gap is within the reach of every 

state, school and school district.

Moreover, our base of knowledge about the state of Hispanic education has increased dramatically in the last few years. We know much more about what has contributed to the low education attainment of Hispanic students in the past. More importantly, we now know what it takes 

to improve education outcomes for these students. We also possess the tools, information and 

resources to accelerate the academic achievement of Hispanic Americans. What remains is the 

willingness to act on this knowledge: to form new collaborations, disseminate information far and 

wide, engage public and private organizations—small, medium and large—and to enlist parents 

and families as full partners in these efforts. Instead of waiting on something or someone else, we 

can and must accept responsibility for doing our part to close the academic achievement gap for 

Hispanic students. A growing number of stakeholders in the Hispanic community are doing just 

that, and more are joining these ranks every day. It is in all our interests that we become part of 

this growing effort.

After all, providing a Hispanic student with a quality education can transform the economic wellbeing of a family in just one generation. Multiply this a hundred times, and we can transform the 

health and vitality of an entire community. Expand this across the country and we can help secure 

the future prosperity of the nation.
58
59

Bibliography

America Creating Opportunities to Meaningfully Promote Excellence in Technology, Education and 

Science Act of 2007, Public Law 110-69, 110th Cong., U.S. Statutes at Large 153 (2007).

Bush, G.W. “President Bush Discusses the No Child Left Behind Act.” Keynote address presented 

at Horace Greeley Elementary School, Chicago, Ill, Jan. 7, 2008.

———. 2006. White House State of the Union. Annual address to the nation, Washington, D.C., 

Jan. 31, 2006.

———. 2006. “President Bush Discusses No Child Left Behind Reauthorization.” Keynote address presented at the Waldorf=Astoria, New York, N.Y., Sept. 26, 2007.

———. 2008. White House State of the Union. Annual address to the nation, Washington, D.C., 

Jan. 28, 2008. 

College Board. 2007. Advanced Placement Report to the Nation 2007. New York: Author. 

Also available online at http://www.collegeboard.com/prod_downloads/about/news_info/

ap/2007/2007_ap-report-nation.pdf (accessed Feb. 6, 2008).

Commission on the Future of Higher Education. 2006. A Test of Leadership: Charting the Future 

of U.S. Higher Education. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education. Also available 

online at http://www.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/hiedfuture/reports/pre-pub-report.pdf (accessed Feb. 6, 2008).

Coppola, J. 2005. “English language learners: Language and literacy development during the 

preschool years.” Journal of the New England Reading Association, 41(2):18–23.

Green, J.P. and M. A. Winters. 2005. Education Working Paper No. 8: Public High School Graduation and College-Readiness Rates: 1991–2002, 15, table 1. New York: Center for Civic 

Innovation, Manhattan Institute. Available online at http://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/

ewp_08.htm#05 (accessed July 2, 2008).

Guzman, J.M. E-mail message to author, April 27, 2007.

Hidalgo Independent School District. 2008. Proposed Early College High School Curriculum Sequence: Cohorts 1–3. Hidalgo, Texas: Author.

Kindler, A. 2002. Survey of the States’ Limited English Proficient Students and Available Educational Programs and Services: 2000–01 Summary Report. Washington, D.C.: National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition and Language Instruction, Office of English Language Acquisition, U.S. Department of Education. Available online at http://www.ncela.gwu.

edu/policy/states/reports/seareports/0001/sea0001.pdf (accessed Feb. 6, 2008).

National Research Council of the National Academies. 2006. Hispanics and the Future of 

America. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
60

National Center for Education Statistics. 2005. NAEP 2004 Trends in Academic Progess: Three 

Decades of Student Performance in Reading and Mathematics. Washington, D.C.: Institute 

of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Also available online at http://nces.

ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2005464 (accessed Aug. 6, 2008).

———. 2006. National Center for Education Statistics. National Digest of Education Statistics: 

2006. Washington, D.C.: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Also 

available online at http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d06/ (accessed Feb. 6, 2008).

National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition and Language Instruction Educational 

Programs. 2006. “Frequently Asked Questions: How Many School-aged English Language 

Learners (ELLs) Are There in the U.S.?” Washington, D.C.: Office of English Language Acquisition, U.S. Department of Education. Available online at http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/expert/

faq/01leps.html (accessed Feb. 6, 2008).

National Mathematics Advisory Panel. 2007. Final Report on the National Survey of Algebra 

Teachers for the National Math Panel. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center, University 

of Chicago. Also available online at http://www.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/mathpanel/final-report-algebra-teachers.pdf (accessed Feb.6, 2008).

———. 2008. Foundations for Success: The Final Report of the National Mathematics Advisory 

Panel. Washington, D.C.: Author. Also available online at http://www.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/

list/mathpanel/index.html (accessed March 20, 2008).

———. 2007. Preliminary Report: National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, D.C.: Author. Also available online at http://www.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/mathpanel/pre-report.pdf 

(accessed Feb. 6, 2008).

No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Public Law 107-110, 110th Cong., U.S. Statutes at Large 115 

(2002): 1429.

Pimental, M.A. E-mail message to author, May 2, 2007.

President’s Advisory Commission on Educational Excellence for Hispanic Americans. 2003. From 

Risk to Opportunity—Fulfilling the Educational Needs of Hispanic Americans in the 21st Century: The Final Report of the President’s Advisory Commission on Educational Excellence for 

Hispanic Americans. Washington, D.C.: Author. Also available online at http://www.yesican.

gov/paceea/finalreport.pdf (accessed Feb. 6, 2008).

———. 2002. The Road to a College Diploma—The Complex Reality of Rising Educational 

Achievement for Hispanics in the United States: The Interim Report of the President’s Advisory Commission on Educational Excellence for Hispanic Americans. Washington, D.C.: Author. Also available online at http://www.yesican.gov/paceea/finalinterim.pdf (accessed Feb. 

6, 2008).

Spellings, Margaret. 2005. “Our High Schools Need Help ... .” Washington Post, 

April 2, 2005.
61

———. 2006. Remarks at opening dinner of the U.S. University Presidents Summit on International Education. Washington, D.C., Jan. 5, 2006.

Suro, Roberto. 2005. “Hispanics in the United States.” Remarks from the conference “Pathways 

to Hispanic Family Learning: Highlighting Public and Private Efforts to Meet the Educational 

Needs of the Hispanic Family,” Washington, D.C., June 16, 2005.

Texas Education Agency. 2006. 2005–06 School Report Card: Hidalgo High School. Austin: Author. Also available online at http://www.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/aeis/ (accessed Feb. 6, 

2008).

———. 2007a. Adequate Yearly Progress District Data Table: Final 2007 AYP Results; Hidalgo 

Independent School District. Austin: Author. Also available online at http://www.tea.state.tx.us/

ayp/2007/district.srch.html (accessed Feb. 12, 2008).

———. 2007b. 2006–07 School Report Card: Hidalgo High School. Austin: Author. Also available 

online at http://www.tea.state.tx.us/ayp/2007/index.html (accessed Feb. 12, 2008).

Title I—Improving the Academic Achievement of the Disadvantaged: Proposed Rule. 34 CFR Part 

200. Federal Register, vol. 73, no. 79 (2008): 22019–22044. Also available online at http://

www.ed.gov/legislation/FedRegister/other/2008-2/042308a.html (accessed June 13, 2008).

Title III of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, as amended by the No Child Left 

Behind Act of 2001. Federal Register, vol. 73, no. 86 (2008): 24266–24272.

U.S. Census Bureau. 2003. School Enrollment—Social and Economic Characteristics of

Students: October 2003. Washington, D.C.: Author. Also available at http://www.census.gov/

prod/2005pubs/p20-554.pdf (accessed March 26, 2008).

U.S. Department of Education. 2007. School Improvement Fund State Application: Section 

1003(g), Fiscal Year 2007. Washington, D.C.: Student Achievement and School Accountability Programs, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, U.S. Department of Education. 

Also available online at http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/guid/stateletters/schimpfundappl.pdf 

(accessed Feb. 6, 2008).

———. 2006. Tool Kit for Hispanic Families: Resources to Help Children Succeed in School (Guía 

Para las Familias Hispanas: Recursos Para Ayudar a los Niños a Tener Éxito en la Escuela). 

Washington, D.C.: Author. Also available online at http://www.ed.gov/parents/academic/involve/toolkit/toolkit.pdf and http://www.ed.gov/espanol/parents/academic/involve/toolkit/toolkit.pdf (accessed Feb. 6, 2008).

———. 2008. Weekly Department Report: Week of July 28, 2008. Washington, D.C.: Author.

Valiotis, C. Correspondence to author, April 25, 2007.

White House Initiative on Educational Excellence for Hispanic Americans. 2002. A Guide for 

Reading: How Parents Can Help Their Children Be Ready to Read and Ready to Learn (Guía 

Para Leer: Cómo los Padres Pueden Preparar Sus Hijos a Leer y Aprender Desde la Infancia). Washington, D.C.: Author. Also available online at http://www.yesican.gov/publications/
62

guide/pub.html and http://www.yesican.gov/publications/guide/pub-esp.html (accessed Feb. 

6, 2008).

———. 2005. Pathways to Hispanic Family Learning: Highlighting Public and Private Efforts to 

Meet the Education Needs of the Hispanic Family. Washington, D.C.: Author. Also available 

online at http://www.yesican.gov/publications/pdf/pathways.pdf (accessed Feb. 6, 2008).

———. 2007. The American Competitiveness Initiative: Challenges and Opportunities for Hispanic Serving Institutions. Washington, D.C.: Author. Also available online at http://www.yesican.

gov/aci/booklet.pdf (accessed Feb. 6, 2008).
63

Appendixes
64
Appendix A:

Wednesday,

October 17, 2001

Part III

The President

Executive Order 13230—President’s

Advisory Commission on Educational

Excellence for Hispanic Americans

Proclamation 7485—National School

Lunch Week, 2001

Proclamation 7486—White Cane Safety

Day, 2001
Presidential Documents

52841

Federal Register

Vol. 66, No. 201

Wednesday, October 17, 2001

Title 3—

The President

Executive Order 13230 of October 12, 2001

President’s Advisory Commission on Educational Excellence

for Hispanic Americans

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the

laws of the United States of America, and in order to advance the development of human potential, strengthen the Nation’s capacity to provide highquality education, and increase opportunities for Hispanic Americans to

participate in and benefit from Federal education programs, it is hereby

ordered as follows:

Section 1. There is established, in the Department of Education, the President’s Advisory Commission on Educational Excellence for Hispanic Americans (Commission). The Commission shall consist of not more than 25

members. Twenty-one of the members shall be appointed by the President.

Those members shall be representatives of educational, business, professional, and community organizations who are committed to improving educational attainment within the Hispanic community, as well as other persons

deemed appropriate by the President. The President shall designate two

of the appointed members to serve as Co-Chairs of the Commission. The

other four members of the Commission shall be ex officio members, one

each from the Department of Education, the Department of Housing and

Urban Development, the Department of the Treasury, and the Small Business

Administration. The ex officio members shall be the respective Secretaries

of those agencies and the Administrator of the Small Business Administration, or their designees.

Sec. 2. The Commission shall provide advice to the Secretary of Education

(‘‘Secretary’’) and shall issue reports to the President, as described in section

7 below, concerning:

(a) the progress of Hispanic Americans in closing the academic achievement

gap and attaining the goals established by the President’s ‘‘No Child Left

Behind’’ educational blueprint;

(b) the development, monitoring, and coordination of Federal efforts to

promote high-quality education for Hispanic Americans;

(c) ways to increase parental, State and local, private sector, and community

involvement in improving education; and

(d) ways to maximize the effectiveness of Federal education initiatives

within the Hispanic community.

Sec. 3. There is established, in the Department of Education, an office

called the White House Initiative on Educational Excellence for Hispanic

Americans (Initiative). The Initiative shall be located at, staffed, and supported by the Department of Education, and headed by a Director, who

shall be a senior level executive branch official who reports to the Secretary.

The Initiative shall provide the necessary staff, resources, and assistance

to the Commission and shall assist and advise the Secretary in carrying

out his responsibilities under this order. The staff of the Initiative shall

gather and disseminate information relating to the educational achievement

gap of Hispanic Americans, using a variety of means, including conducting

surveys, conferences, field hearings, and meetings, and other appropriate

52842 Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 201 / Wednesday, October 17, 2001 / Presidential Documents

vehicles designed to encourage the participation of organizations and individuals interested in such issues, including parents, community leaders, academicians, business leaders, teachers, employers, employees and public officials at the local, State, and Federal levels. To the extent permitted by

law, executive branch departments and agencies shall cooperate in providing

resources, including personnel detailed to the Initiative, to meet the objectives

of this order. The Initiative shall include both career civil service and

appointed staff with expertise in the area of education.

Sec. 4. Executive branch departments and agencies, to the extent permitted

by law and practicable, shall provide any appropriate information requested

by the Commission or the staff of the Initiative, including data relating

to the eligibility for and participation by Hispanic Americans in Federal

education programs and the progress of Hispanic Americans in closing the

academic achievement gap and in achieving the goals of the President’s

‘‘No Child Left Behind’’ education blueprint. Where adequate data are not

available, the Commission shall suggest the means for collecting the data.

In accordance with the accountability goals established by the President,

executive branch departments and agencies involved in relevant programs

shall report to the President through the Initiative by September 30, 2002,

on:

(a) efforts to increase participation of Hispanic Americans in Federal education programs and services;

(b) efforts to include Hispanic-serving school districts, Hispanic-serving

institutions, and other educational institutions for Hispanic Americans in

Federal education programs and services;

(c) levels of participation attained by Hispanic Americans in Federal education programs and services; and

(d) the measurable impact resulting from these efforts and levels of participation. The Department of Education’s report also shall describe the overall

condition of Hispanic American education and such other aspects of the

educational status of Hispanic Americans, as the Secretary considers appropriate.

Sec. 5. Insofar as the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5

U.S.C. App), may apply to the Commission, any functions of the President

under that Act, except that of reporting to the Congress, shall be performed

by the Department of Education in accordance with the guidelines that

have been issued by the Administrator of General Services.

Sec. 6. (a) Members of the Commission shall serve without compensation,

but shall be allowed travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, as authorized by law for persons serving intermittently in the Government service (5 U.S.C. 5701–5707).

(b) To the extent permitted by law, the Department of Education shall

provide funding and administrative support for the Commission and the

Initiative.

Sec. 7. The Commission shall prepare and submit an interim and final

report to the President outlining its findings and recommendations as follows:

(a) The Commission shall submit an Interim Report no later than September

30, 2002. The Interim Report shall describe the Commission’s examination

of:

(i) available research and information on the effectiveness of current

practices at the local, State, and Federal levels in closing the educational achievement gap for Hispanic Americans and attaining the

goals established by the President’s ‘‘No Child Left Behind’’ educational blueprint;

(ii) available research and information on the effectiveness of current

practices involving Hispanic parents in the education of their children; and

Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 201 / Wednesday, October 17, 2001 / Presidential Documents 52843

(iii) the appropriate role of Federal agencies’ education programs in

helping Hispanic parents successfully prepare their children to

graduate from high school and attend post secondary institutions.

(b) The Commission shall issue a Final Report no later than March 31,

2003. The Final Report shall set forth the Commission’s recommendations

regarding:

(i) a multi-year plan, based on the data collected concerning identification of barriers to and successful models for closing the educational achievement gap for Hispanic Americans, that provides for

a coordinated effort among parents, community leaders, business

leaders, educators, and public officials at the local, State, and Federal levels to close the educational achievement gap for Hispanic

Americans and ensure attainment of the goals established by the

President’s ‘‘No Child Left Behind’’ educational blueprint.

(ii) the development of a monitoring system that measures and holds

executive branch departments and agencies accountable for the coordination of Federal efforts among the designated executive departments and agencies to ensure the participation of Hispanic

Americans in Federal education programs and promote high-quality

education for Hispanic Americans;

(iii) the identification of successful methods employed throughout the

Nation in increasing parental, State and local, private sector, and

community involvement in improving education for Hispanic

Americans;

(iv) ways to improve on and measure the effectiveness of Federal agencies’ education programs in ensuring that Hispanic Americans close

the educational achievement gap and attain the goals established

by the President’s ‘‘No Child Left Behind’’ educational blueprint;

and

(v) how Federal Government education programs can best be applied

to ensure Hispanic parents successfully prepare their children to

attend post secondary institutions.

Sec. 8. The Commission shall terminate 30 days after submitting its final

report, unless extended by the President.

Sec. 9. Executive Order 12900 of February 22, 1994, as amended, is revoked.

[FR Doc. 01

Filed 10–16–

–

01; 8:45 am]

26339

THE WHITE HOUSE,

October 12, 2001.

W

Billing code 3195–01–P

69

Appendix B:

President’s Advisory Commission on Educational 

Excellence For Hispanic Americans

Oct. 12, 2001–March 31, 2003

Cochairs

Frank Hanna, Atlanta

Enedelia Schofield, Hillsboro, Ore.

Members

Micaela Alvarez, McAllen, Texas

Christopher J. Barbic, Houston

Fernando (Frank) Caldeiro, League City, Texas

José G. Canchola, Tucson, Az.

Jaime A. Escalante, Roseville, Calif. 

Charles P. Garcia, Boca Raton, Fla. 

Norma S. Garza, Brownsville, Texas 

Alexander Gonzalez, San Marcos, Calif. 

Miguel A. Hernandez, Jr., Sea Brook, Texas 

Rev. Jose Hoyos, Dale City, Va.

Patricia J. Mazzuca, Philadelphia

Francisco J. Paret, Palo Alto, Calif.

Altagracia (Grace) Ramos, Beavercreek, Ohio 

Van D. Romero, Albuquerque, N.M.

Jon Secada, Miami

Ofelia Saenz Vanden Bosch, Wimberly, Texas 

Rene Vazquez, San Juan, Puerto Rico 

Octavio J. Visiedo, Coral Gables, Fla. 

Ex-Officio Members

Administrator Hector Barreto, U.S. Small Business Administration

Secretary Mel Martinez, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

Secretary Rod Paige, U.S. Department of Education

Secretary John W. Snow, U.S. Department of the Treasury

Ex-Officio Designees

Fred C. Armendariz, U.S. Small Business Administration

Anna Maria Farias, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

Maria Hernandez Ferrier, U.S. Department of Education 

Treasurer Rosario Marin, U.S. Department of the Treasury
70
71

Appendix C: 

Partner Organizations of the

Partnership for Hispanic Family Learning

A

Academy of Multilingual Immersion Studies–Cincinnati 

Public Schools, Cincinnati, Ohio

Acción Social Comunitaria, St. Louis, Mo. 

Administration for Children and Families, 

Head Start Bureau, Washington, D.C. 

Albuquerque Public Schools, Albuquerque, N.M.

Alcanzando Metas Foundation, Washington, D.C.

Alianzas, Kansas City, Mo. 

Alianza Ministerial Hispana Area McAllen, Edinburg, 

Texas

Alliance for Children and Families, Washington, D.C. 

Alliant International University, San Diego, Calif. 

Altavista Faith-Based Initiative Corporation, Carrollton, 

Texas

Alternate Learning & Career Center, Toledo, Ohio

Alverno College, Milwaukee, Wis.

America’s Promise Alliance, Washington, D.C.

American Association of Community Colleges, 

 Washington, D.C.

America’s Tutors by Talking Page, Newport Beach, 

Calif.

Anne Arundel County Public Schools, Annapolis, Md.

Antelope Valley College, Lancaster, Calif.

APREMAT/USA, Napa, Calif. 

Archdiocese of Washington, Washington, D.C.

Arizona Fathers and Families Coalition, Inc., Phoenix, 

Ariz. 

Arroyo Valley High School, San Bernardino, Calif.

Association of Latino Administrators and 

Superintendents (ALAS), Lawrence, Mass.

Asyncrob & Associates, Fairfax, Va.

Aurora Public Schools, Aurora, Colo.

AVANCE—Austin, Austin, Texas

AVANCE—San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas

AVANCE—Río Grande Valley, McAllen, Texas 

Austin Community College, Austin, Texas

B

Baldwin Park Unified School District, Baldwin Park, 

Calif.

Baltimore City Public Schools, Baltimore, Md.

BASA–Logros Institute: Center for Latino Achievement 

& Advancement, Edgewater, N.J. 

Bayside High School, Clearwater, Fla.

Beaver Ridge Elementary School, Gwinnett County 

Public Schools, Norcross, Ga. 

Bentiva Education Solutions, Arlington, Texas

Bert Corona Leadership Institute, Washington, D.C.

Better English-Spanish Translations, St. Louis, Mo.

Better Executive Spanish Teaching, Chesterfield, Mo.

Bienestar Family Services, Denver, Colo.

Bilingual Schools Association, Miami, Fla.

Birth to Three and Parenting Now! Eugene, Ore. 

Blue Ridge Community College, Flat Rock, N.C.

Boys & Girls Clubs of America, Atlanta, Ga.

Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Houston, Inc., Houston, 

Texas

Bridgeport School District, Bridgeport, Wash.

Bronx Community College, Bronx, N.Y.

C

C2 Education, Lilburn, Ga.

Cable in the Classroom, Washington, D.C.

Camino Real Early Childhood Intervention, Lytle, 

Texas

CampInteractive, Bronx, N.Y.

Carlsbad Literacy Programs, Carlsbad, N.M.

Casa Durango, Lynwood, Calif.

Casa Guanajuato, Moline, Ill.

Catholic Charities, Salina, Kan. 

Cathedral CDC Social Services, Perth Amboy, N.J.

Cedar Valley Publishing, Fredonia, Wis.

Celebrate Childhood, Cumming, Ga.

Center for Children & Families, Education 

Development Center, Newton, Mass. 

Center for Civic Education, Calabasas, Calif.

Center for the Education & Study of Diverse 

Populations (CESDP), Española, N.M.

Center for Excellence in Early Education, Miami, Fla.

Center for Help, Annapolis, Md.

Center for Intercultural Teaching and Learning, 

 Goshen, Ind.

Central State University, Wilberforce, Ohio

Centro Comunitario Nueva Esperanza (New Hope 

Community Center), Hialeah, Fla. 

Centro de la Comunidad Unida, Milwaukee, Wis.

Centro Latino de Salud, Educación y Cultura, 

 Columbia, Mo.

César Chávez Public Charter School for Public Policy, 

Washington, D.C. 
72

CCA Alliance, Inc., Houston, Texas

CHE—Concerned Hispanic Evangelicals, 

 Houston, Texas

Chicanos por la Causa, Inc., Phoenix, Ariz.

Chino Valley Unified School District, China, Calif.

The Choice Is Yours, Inc., Camden, N.J.

Christ the King School, Corpus Christi, Texas 

Cincinnati State, Cincinnati, Ohio

City and County of Denver, Denver, Colo.

Clara Louise School, Lawrenceville, Ga.

Clear Channel, Rockville, Md.

Coalition for Hispanic Family Services, Brooklyn, N.Y.

College Board, San Jose, Calif.

College Bound Hispanics, Aspen, Colo.

College of Santa Fe, Santa Fe, N.M. 

College Summit, Washington, D.C. 

Colorado State Library, Office of Community Outreach, 

Denver, Colo.

Colorado Statewide Parent Coalition, Westminster, 

Colo. 

Columbia Explorers Academy, Local School Council, 

Chicago, Il.

Community Action, Inc., of Hays, Caldwell and Blanco 

Counties, San Marcos, Texas

Community/Family Counseling Programs, Los 

Angeles, Calif.

Community Health Choice, Houston, Texas

Community Resource Project, Inc., Sacramento, Calif.

Conrad Schools of Science, Wilmington, Del.

Coolidge High School, Coolidge, Ariz.

Competitive Crisis Council, South Pasadena, Calif.

Crystal City ISD, Crystal City, Texas

Conn. Parent Plus, Canton, Conn.

Copernicus Project, UC Riverside, Riverside, Calif.

Cuatro Media, Inc. New York, N.Y.

Cuban American National Council, Miami, Fla.

Cup of Living Water, Pennington, N.J.

D

DC ParentSmart, Washington, D.C. 

Delmarva Rural Ministries Inc, Dover, Del.

Denver Public Schools, Denver, Colo. 

Dialogue on Diversity, Inc., Washington, D.C.

Dorcas Place Adult & Family Learning Center, 

Providence, R.I.

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., Elementary, Santa Ana, 

Calif.

Drug-Free Communities Commission, 

 New London, Wis.

E

East Wake Middle School, Raleigh, N.C.

EDUCalif.MEXUS, Tucson, Ariz.

Educational Broadcasting Corporation, New York, N.Y.

Educational Policy Institute, Virginia Beach, Va.

Edunet24, Erlanger, Ky. 

El Centro Inc., Kansas City, Kan.

El Puente CDC dba KidWorks, Santa Ana, Calif.

El Valor, Chicago, Ill. 

Elia Enterprises, Las Vegas, Nev. 

ELL Educational Services, School District U-46, Elgin, Ill.

Encourage Tomorrow, Fresno, Calif.

E.N.L.A.C.E., Kerrville, Texas

Engaging Latino Communities in Education (ENLACE) 

New Mexico, Albuquerque, N.M.

English Works, Layton, Utah

Enrich Task Force, Burlington, N.C.

EOPA/Toledo Head Start, Toledo, Ohio

Escuela de Guadalupe, Denver, Colo.

Esperanza USA, Orlando, Fla.

Eugene School District 4J, Eugene, Ore.

Everest College Online, Tempe, Ariz.

F

1492 Media Inc, San Juan Capistrano, Calif.

FAME Public Charter School, Brentwood, Calif.

Families in Schools, Los Angeles, Calif.

Families Together, Inc., Wichita, Kan.

Families Together of Orange County, Santa Ana, Calif.

Fathers Active in Communities & Education (FACE), 

New Braunfels, Texas

Feldstein Family Literacy Program, Malden, Mass. 

First Book, Washington, D.C.

First Step Fund, Kansas City, Mo.

Florida Department of Education, Office of Equity and 

Access, Tallahassee, Fla. 

Florida International University, Office of Diversity & 

International Programs, Miami, Fla.

Focus on the Family, Colorado Springs, Colo.

Foreign Language Academy, Kansas City, Mo.

Fox Entertainment Group, Los Angeles, Calif.

Fresno Pacific University, Fresno, Calif.

Frida Kahlo Community Organization, Chicago, Ill.

Fulton County Juvenile Court, Atlanta, Ga.

G

Gary’s Kids, Sandy, Utah

GEMAS Consulting, Pomona, Calif.

GEM’S GEMS Books for Kids, El Paso, Texas

Georgia Charter Schools Association, Atlanta, Ga.

The Georgia Project, Dalton, Ga. 

Generación Floreciente, Salt Lake City, Utah

Georgia Charter Schools Association, Atlanta, Ga.

Georgia Department of Education, Atlanta, Ga.

Georgia Gwinnett College, Lawrenceville, Ga.
73

Georgia Foundation of Independent Colleges, Atlanta, 

Ga.

Georgia Medical Institute, Powder Springs, Ga.

Georgia State Board of Education/Latino Commission, 

 Norcross, Ga. 

Georgetown Public Policy Institute, Washington, D.C.

Girl Scout Council of the Nation’s Capital, Manassas, 

Va.

Girl Scouts of the USA, New York, N.Y. 

Goes Consulting, Atlanta, Ga.

Governor’s Advisory Council on Hispanic Affairs, 

 New Castle, Del.

GreatSchools, San Francisco, Calif.

Grupo Amistad Visión, Soquel, Calif.

Guidance Center, Southgate Center, Mich.

H

Habla el Día/Stanford, Stanford, Calif.

Harvest America Corporation, Garden City, Kan.

HBoard of Ed, New Milford, N.J.

Head Start, Houston, Texas

H.E. Butt Grocery Company, Spring, Texas 

Health Net of California, Pasadena, Calif.

Hermandad de Sigma Iota Alpha, Inc., Washington, 

D.C.

Hidalgo ISD, Hidalgo, Texas

Hispanic & Latin American Research Program, 

University of Texas at Tyler, Tyler, Texas 

Hispanic College Fund, Washington, D.C. 

Hispanic Council for Reform and Educational Options 

(CREO), Washington, D.C. 

Hispanic Engineers National Achievement Awards 

Conference (HENAAC), Los Angeles, Calif.

Hispanic Family Initiative, Houston, Texas

Hispanic Heritage Foundation, Washington, D.C.

Hispanic Housing & Education Corp., Houston, Texas

Hispanic Information & Telecommunications Network, 

Inc., New York, N.Y. 

Hispanic Scholarship Consortium, Austin, Texas 

Hispanic Scholarship Fund, San Francisco, Calif. 

Hispanic Scholarship Fund Institute, Washington, D.C. 

Hispanic Youth Foundation, Fairfax, Va.

Hispanics for Opportunity, Progress & Education 

(HOPE), Austin, Texas

HITN, Brooklyn, N.Y.

Home Education Livelihood Program, Inc., (HELP) 

 New Mexico, Albuquerque, N.M.

Hope Community Foundation, Vineland, N.J.

Horry County School Districts, Myrtle Beach, S.C.

Hot 92.3—Heritage Begins Within, Los Angeles, Calif.

Houghton-Mifflin Company, Boston, Mass.

I

IAA College, Phoenix, Ariz.

Idaho Commission on Hispanic Affairs, Boise, Idaho

Iglesia de Cristo, Misión Elim, Los Angeles, Calif.

Iglesia Evangélica Hispana UCC, Pawtucket, R.I.

Illinois First Amendment Center, Springfield, Ill.

Indiana State Commission on Hispanic/Latino, 

Indianapolis, Ind.

Inland Empire Future Leaders, San Bernardino, Calif.

Inner City Struggle, Los Angeles, Calif.

Institute of International Education, New York, N.Y.

Institute for Global Commerce and Government, Tracy, 

Calif.

Institute for Latino Studies, University of Notre Dame, 

 Notre Dame, Ind. 

Interbusiness Institute, Chicago, Ill.

Intercultural Development Research Association 

(IDRA), San Antonio, Texas 

Interstate Migrant Education Council (IMEC), 

Washington, D.C. 

Inter-University Program for Latino Research, 

Washington, D.C.

Iowa Division of Latino Affairs, Des Moines, Iowa

ISTA, Los Angeles, Calif.

J

JA Worldwide, Colorado Springs, Colo.

Jehovah Jireh Outreach (A Church Beyond the Walls), 

 Manning, S.C.

Junior Achievement, El Paso, Texas

Junior Achievement—Rocky Mountain Inc., Denver, 

Colo.

K

KIPP LA Prep, Los Angeles, Calif.

Knowledge Alliance, Washington, D.C.

L

La Casa Latina, Sioux City, Iowa

La Causa Inc, Milwaukee, Wis..

Lafayette Parish School System, Lafayette, LA

LA SED, Inc., Detroit, Mich.

Lake City Hispanic House, Lake City, Fla.

Latin American Association, Atlanta, Ga. 

Latin American Community Center, Wilmington, Del. 

Latin American Youth Center, Washington, D.C.

Latin Business Association (LBA), Los Angeles, Calif.

Latino Art Beat, Chicago, Ill.

Latino Education Institute at Worcester State College, 

 Worcester, Mass. 

Latino Educational Issues Roundtable, Fresno, Calif.

Latino Initiatives for the Next Century-TELACU 

Education Foundation, Chicago, Ill.
74

Latino Leadership Alliance of Bucks County, Bristol, 

Pa.

Latino Print Network, Carlsbad, Calif.

Latino Scholastic Achievement Corp., Whittier, Calif.

Launch Pad—The Center for Hope and Building 

Dreams, Austin, Texas

Laurens 55 District High School, Laurens, S.C.

LAUSD Sunrise Elementary School, Los Angeles, 

Calif.

Lawn Manor Primary School, Palos Heights, Ill.

Learning Dollars Bank, Fairfax, Va. 

Learning Leaders, New York, N.Y. 

The Learning Source for Adults and Families, 

Lakewood, Colo.

Lincoln-Marti Schools, Miami, Fla.

Los Angeles City College, Los Angeles, Calif.

Los Kitos Entertainment, LLC, Santa Ana, Calif. 

LUPE—La Unión del Pueblo Entero, Fresno, Calif.

Lyford C.I.S.D., Lyford, Texas

M

Macro International, Springfield, Va.

McGraw-Hill Companies, McGraw-Hill Education, 

New York, N.Y.

MANA de Topeka—A National Latina Organization, 

Topeka, Kan.

Manchester School District, Manchester, N.H.

Mayor’s Office for Education and Children, Denver, 

Colo.

Metropolitan School District—Lawrence Township, 

Indianapolis, Ind.

Mexican American Veterans Association (MAVA), 

Chicago, Ill.

Mexican Institute of Greater Houston, Houston, Texas

Miami-Dade County School Board, Miami, Fla. 

Miami-Dade County Public Schools, Division of 

Bilingual Education and World Languages, Miami, 

Fla.

Midwest Educational Resources Development Fund, 

Inc., West Des Moines, Iowa 

Mills Management Consulting Company, Pacific 

Palisades, Calif.

Ministerios Bethania USA, Carrollton, Texas

MLA Partner Schools, Los Angeles, Calif.

Morton College, Cicero, Ill.

Motheread, Inc., Raleigh, N.C.

MTI College of Business and Technology, Houston, 

Texas

Multicultural Community Service at the Josephine 

Butler Parks Center, Washington, D.C.

Multi-Media Art Youth Academy, Los Angeles, Calif.

N

NASA, Space Life Sciences, Houston, Texas 

National Adult Education Consortium, Washington, 

D.C.

National Association of Hispanic Publications 

Foundation, Washington, D.C. 

National Center for Family Literacy, Louisville, Ky. 

National Center for Latino Child and Family Research, 

Laytonsville, Md.

National Coalition for At-Risk Schools, Smyrna, Ga.

National Coalition for Literacy, Washington, D.C. 

National Council for Community and Education 

Partnerships (NCCEP), Washington, D.C.

National GEM, Atlanta, Ga.

National Hispanic Business Association, Austin, Texas

National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference, 

Chicago, Ill.

National Hispanic Coalition of Federal Aviation 

Employees, Washington, D.C.

National Hispanic Medical Association, 

 Washington, D.C. 

National Institute of Standards and Technology, 

 Gaithersburg, Md.

National Latino Children’s Institute, San Antonio, Texas

National Migrant and Seasonal Head Start Association, 

Washington, D.C. 

National PTA, Washington, D.C. 

Navidad en el Barrio, Dallas, Texas

Neighborhood Centers Inc., The BRIDGE II PIRC, 

 Houston, Texas

NCSU Department of 4-H Youth Development and 

Family and Consumer Sciences, Raleigh, N.C.

Nebraska Mexican American Commission, Lincoln, 

Neb.

Nevada Youth Alliance, Las Vegas, Nev.

North Carolina Center for International Understanding, 

Raleigh, N.C.

Northrop High School, Huntertown, Ind.

Northwest Georgia RESA, Rome, Ga.

NYACK College, Washington, D.C.

O

Office of Diversity & International Programs, Florida 

International University, Miami, Fla.

Office of Special Projects, Student Services & 

Regional Outreach, University of Houston, Victoria, 

Texas

Orange County Department of Education, Costa Mesa, 

Calif.

Orange County United Way, Irvine, Calif.

Organización Latina para una Mejor Educación, 

 Stamford, Conn.
75

P

Parent Information Resource Center, Lexington, S.C.

Parent Institute for Quality Education (PIQE), San 

Diego, Calif. 

Parent to Parent of Miami, Inc., Miami, Fla.

Parents Step Ahead, Dallas, Texas

Parker Associates International, Wayne, N.J.

Park View High School, Sterling, Va.

Partners in School Innovation, San Francisco, Calif.

Partnership Academy Charter School, Richfield, Minn.

Performance Books, LLC, Detroit, Mich. 

Phoenix Academy, Detroit, Mich.

Pima College Adult Education, Family Literacy 

Program, Tucson, Ariz.

Please Touch Museum, Philadelphia, Pa. 

Pre-K Now, Washington, D.C.

Prepared 4 Life, Houston, Texas

Prince William County Schools, Manassas, Va.

Project GRAD USA, Houston, Texas

Project INSPIRE, California Association for Bilingual 

Education, Covina, Calif.

Proyecto Cultural, Lincoln, Neb.

Proyecto Hispano de Desarrollo Educativo, Santa Ana, 

Calif.

Public Agenda, New York, N.Y.

Public Education Department, Santa Fe, N.M.

Pueblo City Schools, Pueblo, Colo.

Puerta al Futuro, Fairleigh Dickinson University, 

Hackensack, N.J. 

Q

Quincy Community College, Quincy, Mass.

Qwest Communications, Denver, Colo.

R

Red Clay Consolidated School District, Wilmington, 

Del.

Red E, Virginia Beach, Va. 

Reading and Beyond, Fresno, Calif.

Reading Is Fundamental, Washington, D.C.

Retention Education, LLC, Newport Beach, Calif.

Rincón High School, Tucson, Ariz.

Riverside City College, Riverside, Calif. 

Robert A. Pascal Youth & Family Services, Inc., 

Severna Park, Md.

Roosevelt Parent Center, Los Angeles, Calif.

Rotary International—North Philadelphia Chapter, 

Philadelphia, Pa.

RRCNA, Worthington, Ohio

S

Sacred Heart School, Washington, D.C.

St. Anthony School of Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wis.

St. Joseph the Worker Catholic Church, Chipley, Fla.

San Antonio College, San Antonio, Texas 

San Miguel Middle School, Washington, D.C.

Sauk Valley Community College, Dixon, Ill.

Scholastic Inc., New York, N.Y.

School District U-46, Elgin, Ill.

Seattle Public Schools, Seattle, Wash.

SEDL, Austin, Texas

Self Reliance Foundation, Washington, D.C.

SER Corporation, Bonner Springs, Kan. 

SER Metro-Detroit Jobs for Progress, Inc., Detroit, 

Mich.

Services for Multicultural Students, Weber State 

University, Ogden, Utah

Seven Corners Children’s Center, Falls Church, Va.

Sierra Day FCC, Gloucester, Mass.

Sigma Lambda Beta, Commerce City, Colo.

SMG Foundation, Portland, Ore.

Smithsonian Center for Latino Initiatives, 

 Washington, D.C. 

Society for the Advancement of Chicano/Latinos and 

Native Americans in Science (SACNAS), Santa 

Cruz, Calif.

Socorro Public Schools, Socorro, N.M.

Southwestern Press Inc., Carlsbad, Calif.

State Department of Education, Las Vegas, Nev.

State Farm, Bloomington, Ill. 

Stay Focused Ministries, Bakersfield, Calif. 

Student Social Work, Mesquite, Texas

SUCCESS4U Consulting, New York, N.Y.

Sunrise Elementary School, Los Angeles Unified 

School District, Los Angeles, Calif.

T

TACHE—Texas Association of Chicanos in Higher 

Education, Austin, Texas

Tarrant County College, Fort Worth, Texas

Teachers of English to Speakers of Other languages 

(TESOL), Alexandria, Va.

The Teaching Piñata, Round Rock, Texas

Team Bank of America, Los Angeles, Calif.

Tech-Prep, Victoria, Texas

Telemundo Chicago-NBC, Office of Community 

Relations, Chicago, Ill.

Telemundo Washington, D.C., Arlington, Va.

Texas A&M Research Foundation, Washington, D.C.

Texas A&M University, Edinburg, Texas

Texas Migrant Council, Inc., Laredo, Texas

TIPHER—The Institute for Public Health and 

Education Research, New Braunfels, Texas

TODOS: Mathematics for All, Tempe, Ariz.

Towson University, Towson, Md.

Training Health Institute, Miami, Fla.

Tucson GEAR UP Program, Tucson, Ariz.
76

U

United Community Center/Bruce Guadalupe 

Community School, Milwaukee, Wis..

United Methodist Mexican-American Ministries, 

 Liberal, Kan. 

United States Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, 

 Washington, D.C. 

United Way of Tarrant County, Fort Worth, Texas

University of Arizona, Tucson, Ariz.

University of California Merced, Fresno, Calif.

University of California-Riverside, The Copernicus 

Project, Riverside, Calif.

University of Central Missouri, Warrensburg, Mo.

University of Houston-Victoria, Victoria, Texas

University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, 

Md.

University of North Carolina, Center for International 

Understanding, Raleigh, N.C.

University of Oklahoma, Purcell, Okla.

University of Texas at Arlington, Mesquite, Ariz.

University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas

University of Texas, Pan American, Edinburg, Texas

Univision Radio, San Antonio, Texas

U-R Special, Decatur, Ga.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research 

Triangle Park, N.C.

U.S. Naval Academy, Annapolis, Md.

U.S. Hispanic Youth Entrepreneur Education, 

Baltimore, Md.

V

Van Buren Intermediate School District, Lawrence, 

Mich.

Victoria College, Victoria, Texas

Virginia Latino Advisory Board, Arlington, Va.

Virtual Pre-K & Kindergarten, Chicago, Ill.

W

Warner Norcross & Judd, Grand Rapids, Mich.

Washington State Migrant Council, Sunnyside, Wash.

Waterloo Latin American Club, Waterloo, Iowa 

Weber State University, Ogden, Utah

Welcome Center at McGuffey, Columbus, Ohio

Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Mich.

Wichita State University, Wichita, Kan. 

Woonsocket Education Department, Woonsocket, R.I.

WRC Media (Weekly Reader), Stamford, Conn.

Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio

Y

Youth Development, Inc., Albuquerque, N.M.

Youth & Family Counseling, Flower Mound, Texas

Youth Venture, Arlington, Va.

YMCA of Greater Houston, Houston, Texas

YWCA, Tulsa, Okla.

X

Xavier College Preparatory, Phoenix, Ariz.
77

Appendix D: 

Title V—Developing Hispanic-Serving Institutions Program

The Title V—Developing Hispanic-Serving Institutions Program provides grants to assist HSIs in 

expanding education opportunities for and improving the academic attainment of Hispanic students. Title V grants also enable HSIs to expand and enhance their academic offerings, program 

quality and institutional stability. 

To receive Title V funding, institutions must be designated eligible by the Institutional Development and Undergraduate Education Service (IDUES) Division. An HSI is defined as: an institution 

of higher education that at the end of the award year immediately preceding the date of the application has at least 25 percent Hispanic full-time equivalent (FTE) undergraduate student enrollment and provides assurances that not less than 50 percent of the institution’s Hispanic students 

are low-income individuals. 

Institutions designated as an HSI may apply for two types of five-year development grants: 1) 

Individual Development Grant, $500,000–$554,000; and 2) Cooperative Development Grant, 

$650,000–$700,000.

The following text boxes illustrate the location, types and funding history of grantees.

Title V Number of 

Grantees by State: 

2003–07

Arizona 7

California 60

Colorado 5

Florida 9

Illinois 3

Kansas 3

New Jersey 2

New Mexico 11

New York 8

Pennsylvania 1

Puerto Rico 28

Texas 27

Washington 4

Type and Control 

of Title V Grantees: 

2003–07

Four-year Public 34

Four-year Private 32

Two-year Public 101

Two-year Private 1

Public Institutions 135

Private Institutions 33

Two-year

 Institutions 102

Four-year 

 Institutions 66

Total 168

Title V Funding 

History: 1999–2007

FY 1999: $28,000,000

39 Awards

FY 2000: $42,250,000

39 NCCs,* 69 Awards

FY 2001: $68,500,000

108 NCCs, 49 Awards

FY 2002: $86,000,000

157 NCCs, 34 Awards

FY 2003: $92,396,000

191 NCCs, 29 Awards

FY 2004: $93,551,000

181 NCCs, 31 Awards

FY 2005: $95,873,000

143 NCCs, 46 Awards

FY 2006: $94,914,000

139 NCCs, 33 Awards

FY 2007: $94,914,000

138 NCCs and 30 Awards

*NCCs=Non-Competitive Continuations.
78

Source: Data from Title V Program and Institutional Development and Undergraduate Education 

Service (IDUES) Division’s databases.

Figure A-1. Percentage distribution of Hispanic-Serving Institutions by state: 2007

KS

2%

WA

2%

PR

17%

AZ

4% CO

3% IL

2% NJ

1%

NM

7%

CA

36%

FL

5%

NY

5%

TX

16%

Source: Data from Title V Program and Institutional Development and Undergraduate Education Service 

(IDUES) Division’s databases. 

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

2004 2005 2006 2007

Figure A-2. Title V funding amounts (in millions) for Hispanic-Serving Institutions, by 

funding year: 1999–2007

100

80

60

40

20

0

Millions
79

Appendix E: 

Highlights From 

Foundations for Success: The Final Report of the 

National Mathematics Advisory Panel

To compete in the 21st-century global economy, knowledge of and proficiency in mathematics 

is critical. Today’s high school graduates need to have solid mathematics skills—whether they 

are headed for college or the workforce. To help ensure our nation’s future competitiveness and 

economic viability, President George W. Bush created the National Mathematics Advisory Panel 

(National Math Panel) in April 2006.

The panel was charged with providing recommendations to the president and Secretary Margaret 

Spellings on the best use of scientifically based research to advance the teaching and learning 

of mathematics. Expert panelists, including a number of leading mathematicians, cognitive psychologists and educators, reviewed numerous research studies before preparing a final report 

containing guidance on how to improve mathematics achievement for all students in the United 

States.

The National Math Panel’s final report, issued on March 13, 2008, contains 45 findings and recommendations on numerous topics including instructional practices, materials, professional development, and assessments. Highlights from the report are briefly summarized below. Please 

visit http://www.ed.gov/MathPanel for the executive summary and full report.

Core Principles of Math Instruction

The areas to be studied in mathematics from prekindergarten through eighth grade 

should be streamlined and a well-defined set of the most important topics should be 

emphasized in the early grades. Any approach that revisits topics year after year without 

bringing them to closure should be avoided.

Proficiency with whole numbers, fractions, and certain aspects of geometry and 

measurement are the foundations for algebra. Of these, knowledge of fractions is the 

most important foundational skill not developed among American students.

Conceptual understanding, computational and procedural fluency, and problem solving 

skills are equally important and mutually reinforce each other. Debates regarding the 

relative importance of each of these components of mathematics are misguided.

Students should develop immediate recall of arithmetic facts to free the “working 

memory” for solving more complex problems.

The benchmarks set forth by the Panel should help to guide classroom curricula, 

mathematics instruction, textbook development, and state assessments.

More students should be prepared for and offered an authentic algebra course at Grade 8.

Algebra should be consistently understood in terms of the “Major Topics of School 

Algebra,” as defined by the National Math Panel.

The Major Topics of School Algebra include Symbols and Expressions; linear equations; 

quadratic equations; functions; algebra of polynomials; and combinatorics and finite 

probability.

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•
80

Student Effort Is Important

Much of the public’s “resignation” about mathematics education is based on the erroneous idea 

that success comes from inherent talent or ability in mathematics, not effort. A focus on the importance of effort in mathematics learning will improve outcomes. If children believe that their efforts 

to learn make them “smarter,” they show greater persistence in mathematics learning.

Importance of Knowledgeable Teachers

Teachers’ mathematical knowledge is important for students’ achievement. The 

preparation of elementary and middle school teachers in mathematics should be 

strengthened. Teachers cannot be expected to teach what they do not know.

The use of teachers who have specialized in elementary mathematics teaching could be 

an alternative to increasing all elementary teachers’ mathematics content knowledge by 

focusing the need for expertise on fewer teachers.

Effective Instruction Matters

Teachers’ regular use of formative assessments can improve student learning in 

mathematics.

Instructional practice should be informed by high-quality research, when available, and 

by the best professional judgment and experience of accomplished classroom teachers.

The belief that children of particular ages cannot learn certain content because they are 

“too young” or “not ready” has consistently been shown to be false.

Explicit instruction for students who struggle with math is effective in increasing student 

learning. Teachers should understand how to provide clear models for solving a problem 

type using an array of examples, offer opportunities for extensive practice, encourage 

students to “think aloud,” and give specific feedback.

Mathematically gifted students should be allowed to accelerate their learning.

Publishers should produce shorter, more focused and mathematically accurate 

mathematics textbooks. The excessive length of some U.S. mathematics textbooks is 

not necessary for high achievement.

Effective Assessment

The National assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) and state assessments in

mathematics should be improved in quality and should emphasize the most critical knowledge 

and skills leading to Algebra.

Importance of Research

The nation must continue to build the capacity for more rigorous research in mathematics education to inform policy and practice more effectively.

For more information, please visit http://www.ed.gov/mathpanel (accessed March 31, 2008). 

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•
81

White House Initiative on 

Educational Excellence for Hispanic Americans

Staff

Adam Chavarria

Executive Director

Raquel Cabral Sours

Deputy Director

Glorimar Maldonado Nosal

Marketing-Communications Manager

Stephanie Guillen

Events Manager 

Erika Mendes Hutko

Management and Program Analyst Intern
White House Initiative on 

Educational Excellence for Hispanic Americans

400 Maryland Ave. S.W.

Room 5E110 

Washington, DC 20202-3601 

Phone: (202) 401-1441

Fax: (202) 401-8377

http://www.YesICan.gov