alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsImprovements to an Explicit Algebraic Stress Model for Turbulent Jet Mixing PredictionsModifications to key coefficients in a k − E based explicit algebraic stress model (EASM) are examined with the objective of improving the prediction of turbulent jet flows. The pressure strain coefficient, C2 and the turbulent diffusion coefficients, σk and σE were investigated. For a series of benchmark subsonic jets at heated and unheated conditions, lowering C2 from the default value of 0.36 to 0.10 resulted in a significant improvement in the jet mixing, when compared to experimental data. Changing σk and σE from default values of 1.00 and 1.4489, respectively, to 0.50 and 0.7244, respectively, improved the initial mixing rate, while reducing the farfield mixing rate and the peak turbulent kinetic energy along the centerline. A high-speed mixing layer was also investigated for performance of baseline and modified EASM coefficients, with similar results as for the jet cases. A flat plate boundary layer was briefly examined to determine the effects of changing the coefficients on the turbulent skin friction coefficient. The change to the pressure strain coefficient, C2 = 0.10 is recommended for future EASM calculation of jets flow; however, it is also recommended that the diffusion coefficients remain at their default values.Document ID20190004931Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsGeorgiadis, Nicholas J.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Yoder, Dennis A.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredMay 2, 2019Publication DateMarch 1, 2019Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And ThermodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM—2019-219978E-19661AIAA Paper 2019–0325GRC-E-DAA-TN65223Meeting InformationMeeting: 2019 Science and Technology Forum (SciTech)Location: San Diego, CACountry: United StatesStart Date: January 7, 2019End Date: January 11, 2019Sponsors:American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA)Funding Number(s)WBS: 109492.02.03.01.05.01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Technical ReviewSingle ExpertKeywordsTurbulent MixingAlgebraic Stress ModelAvailable DownloadsNameType20190004931.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 82.304 FD&C Red No. 4.

The color additive FD&C Red No. 4 shall conform in identity and specifications to the requirements of § 74.1304(a)(1) and (b) of this chapter. FD&C Red No. 4 is restricted to use in externally applied drugs and cosmetics.
# C_2014421EN.01006301.xml

| 24.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 421/63 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 421/63

---

Action brought on 5 September 2014 — ZZ and ZZ v Council

(Case F-91/14)

2014/C 421/92

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: ZZ and ZZ (represented by: D. de Abreu Caldas and M. de Abreu Caldas, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Council

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision concerning the transfer of the applicants’ pension rights to the European Union pension scheme applying the new GIP relating to Articles 11 and 12 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | annul the decision calculating the bonus to the first applicant’s pension rights acquired before that applicant’s entry into service in the Council and the decision fixing the number of years of pensionable service obtained once and for all by the second applicant under Articles 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision calculating the bonus to the first applicant’s pension rights acquired before that applicant’s entry into service in the Council and the decision fixing the number of years of pensionable service obtained once and for all by the second applicant under Articles 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations;

| — | order the Council to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council to pay the costs.

---
§ 7.40 Recall policy. ( a ) Recall is an effective method of removing or correcting consumer products that are in violation of laws administered by the Food and Drug Administration. Recall is a voluntary action that takes place because manufacturers and distributors carry out their responsibility to protect the public health and well-being from products that present a risk of injury or gross deception or are otherwise defective. This section and §§ 7.41 through 7.59 recognize the voluntary nature of recall by providing guidance so that responsible firms may effectively discharge their recall responsibilities. These sections also recognize that recall is an alternative to a Food and Drug Administration-initiated court action for removing or correcting violative, distributed products by setting forth specific recall procedures for the Food and Drug Administration to monitor recalls and assess the adequacy of a firm's efforts in recall.
( b ) Recall may be undertaken voluntarily and at any time by manufacturers and distributors, or at the request of the Food and Drug Administration. A request by the Food and Drug Administration that a firm recall a product is reserved for urgent situations and is to be directed to the firm that has primary responsibility for the manufacture and marketing of the product that is to be recalled.
( c ) Recall is generally more appropriate and affords better protection for consumers than seizure, when many lots of product have been widely distributed. Seizure, multiple seizure, or other court action is indicated when a firm refuses to undertake a recall requested by the Food and Drug Administration, or where the agency has reason to believe that a recall would not be effective, determines that a recall is ineffective, or discovers that a violation is continuing.
[43 FR 26218, June 16, 1978, as amended at 65 FR 56476, Sept. 19, 2000]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CYBEX COMPUTER PRODUCTS CORPORATION FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED SEP-30-1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<CIK> 0000946360
<NAME> CYBEX COMPUTER PRODUCTS CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           8,666
<SECURITIES>                                    28,270
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,497
<ALLOWANCES>                                       461
<INVENTORY>                                      4,638
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                47,364
<PP&E>                                           6,338
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,260
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  52,982
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,151
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                      54,012
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    52,982
<SALES>                                         21,962
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,962
<CGS>                                           10,393
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,393
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   226
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   6
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,631
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,992
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,639
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.43
<FN>
WE HAVE CALCULATED EARNINGS PER SHARE AMOUNTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH FAS 128
"EARNINGS PER SHARE." WE HAVE ENTERED BASIC AND DILUTED AMOUNTS IN PLACE OF
PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED, RESPECTIVELY, AND REFLECT THE THREE-FOR-TWO STOCK
DIVIDEND EFFECTIVE APRIL 10, 1998.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed September 6, 2023.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D23-438

Lower Tribunal No. 22-3374

________________

Anti Age Automated Spa, Inc.,

Appellant,

vs.

Kerem Sunny Isles, LLC, etc.,

Appellee.

An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade 

County, Carlos Lopez, Judge.

Vedder Price P.C., Nicole J. Wing, and Samuel M. Deau (Chicago, IL), 

for appellant.

Solomon Cooperman Recondo and Weiss, and Joel M. Gaulkin, for 

appellee.

Before EMAS, FERNANDEZ and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Editorial Note on Part 860
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 860 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008, and at 86 FR 54846, Oct. 5, 2021.

§ 860.210 De Novo request format. ( a ) Each De Novo request or information related to a De Novo request pursuant to this part must be formatted in accordance with this section. Each De Novo request must be provided as a single version in electronic format. These materials must: ( 1 ) ( i ) For devices regulated by the Center for Devices and Radiological Health, be sent to the current address displayed on the website *https://www.fda.gov/cdrhsubmissionaddress .*
( ii ) For devices regulated by the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, be sent to the current address displayed on the website *https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/center-biologics-evaluation-and-research-cber/regulatory-submissions-electronic-and-paper .*
( 2 ) Be signed by the requester or an authorized representative.
( 3 ) Be designated “De Novo Request” in the cover letter.
( 4 ) Have all content used to support the request written in, or translated into, English.
**Incorporation by Reference Docket ID No. EPA**  **- HQ**  **- OAR** **- 2007**  **- 0544** 

**June 13 , 2012**  The contents of the following dockets are hereb y incorporated b y reference into and are considered to be included in, contained in , and to have been placed in Docket EPA - HQ - OAR 20 07 - 0544 ( Pulp and Paper Sector Rule ): 1) A - 92 - 40 (National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Source Category : Pulp and Paper Production -- Chemical Wood Pulping Mills (Kraft, Sulfite, Soda, and Semi - chemical ) ) 2) A - 95 - 31 (National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Source Category : Pulp and Paper Production -- Mechanical Mills, Secondary Fiber Mills, Nonwood Mills, and Paper Machines ) 3) OAR - 2003 - 0205 ( Site - specific Rulemaking for Packaging Corporation of America's Pulp and Paper Mill L ocated in Tomahawk, Wisconsin; Pursuant to the Joint State/EPA Agreement to Pursue Regulatory Innovation) 4) A - 94 - 67 (National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Chemical Recovery Combustion Sources at Kraft, Soda, Sulfite, and Stand - Alone Semichemical Pulp Mills ) 5) OAR - 2002 - 0045 (National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Chemical Recovery

Combustion Sources at Kraft, Soda, Sulfite, and Stand - Alone Semichemical Pulp Mills) Accessing dockets: Publicly available docket materials are available either electronicall y through http://www.regulations.gov or in hard cop y at EPA’s Docket Center, Public Reading Room, EPA West Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004. This Docket Facility

is open f rom 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday , excluding legal holiday s. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566 - 1744, and the telephone number for the Air Docket is (202) 566 - 1742.
Exhibit
      32.1




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**




**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Preferred Voice, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-KSB for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mary G. Merritt,
      Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/
              Mary G.
              MerrittMary
                G. Merritt
              Principal
                Executive Officer
              Principal
                Financial OfficerJuly
                16, 2007
§ 520.1705 Pergolide. ( a ) *Specifications.* Each tablet contains 1 milligram (mg) peroglide (as pergolide mesylate).
( b ) *Sponsor.* See No. 000010 in § 510.600(c) of this chapter.
( c ) *Conditions of use in horses* — ( 1 ) *Amount.* Administer orally at a starting dose of 2 micrograms/kilograms (μ/kg) once daily. Dosage may be adjusted to effect, not to exceed 4 μg/kg daily.
( 2 ) *Indications for use.* For the control of clinical signs associated with Pituitary Pars Intermedia Dysfunction (Equine Cushing's Disease).
( 3 ) *Limitations.* Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian.
[77 FR 15960, Mar. 19, 2012, as amended at 81 FR 22523, Apr. 18, 2016]
# C_2014245EN.01000701.xml

| 28.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 245/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 245/7

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen (Sweden) lodged on 2 June 2014 — Skatteverket v David Hedqvist

(Case C-264/14)

2014/C 245/09

Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Referring court

Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Skatteverket

Applicant:

Defendant: David Hedqvist

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Is Article 2(1) of the VAT Directive (1) to be interpreted as meaning that transactions in the form of what has been designated as the exchange of virtual currency for traditional currency and vice versa, which is effected for consideration added by the supplier when the exchange rates are determined, constitute the supply of a service effected for consideration? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is Article 2(1) of the VAT Directive (1) to be interpreted as meaning that transactions in the form of what has been designated as the exchange of virtual currency for traditional currency and vice versa, which is effected for consideration added by the supplier when the exchange rates are determined, constitute the supply of a service effected for consideration?

1

| 2. | If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative, is Article 135(1) to be interpreted as meaning that the abovementioned exchange transactions are tax exempt? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative, is Article 135(1) to be interpreted as meaning that the abovementioned exchange transactions are tax exempt?

---

(1)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax. (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).

1

---
§ 556.592 Salinomycin. ( a ) *Acceptable daily intake (ADI).* The ADI for total residue of salinomycin is 5 μg/kg of body weight per day.
( b ) *Tolerances.* The tolerances for salinomycin are: ( 1 ) *Chickens.* Edible tissues (excluding eggs): Not required.
( 2 ) *Quail.* Edible tissues (excluding eggs): Not required.
( c ) *Related conditions of use.* See § 558.550 of this chapter.
TS-EMLA50/60/70/80

Attachment #3

Pt. 1, Sec. B 

CAS Inventory Expert Service Report and Chemical Structure of the New Chemical 

Substance 

This attachment gives the CAS Inventory Expert Service (IES) Report on the new chemical 

substance. The chemical structure of the compound is also provided. 
INVENTORY EXPERT SERVICE REPORT

Please print the above CA Index Name on the appropriate page of your PMN.

If this box is checked, CAS has made correction(s) marked in red to your IES order. 

Please make the same corrections to your PMN before submitting it to the EPA.

A	division	of	the	American	Chemical	Society	 Phone:	800-631-1884,	614-447-3870

Fax:	614-447-3747

E-mail: answers@cas.org

Web: www.cas.org/products/other-cas-products/client-services/

InventoryExpertService

CAS					•					2540	Olentangy	River	Road					•					P.O.	Box	3343					•					Columbus,	OH		43210-0334					•					USA

,(62UGHU1XPEHU

5HJLVWU\1XPEHU

&$,QGH[1DPH
§ 556.167 Colistimethate. ( a ) [Reserved]
( b ) *Tolerances.* The tolerance for colistimethate is: ( 1 ) *Chickens.* Edible tissues (excluding eggs): Not required.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
( c ) *Related conditions of use.* See § 522.468 of this chapter.
# C_2015354EN.01003002.xml

| 26.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 354/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 354/30

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2015 — EE v OHIM (Representation of white dots on a grey background)

(Case T-77/14) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Application for a Community figurative mark representing white dots on a grey background - Absolute ground for refusal - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2015/C 354/33)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: EE Ltd (Hatfield, United Kingdom) (represented by: P. Brownlow, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 24 October 2013 (Case R 704/2013-1) relating to an application for registration as a Community trade mark of a figurative sign representing white dots on a grey background.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders EE Ltd to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EE Ltd to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 135, 5.5.2014.

1

---
# C_2015096EN.01001901.xml

| 23.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/19

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 February 2015 — Infocit v OHIM — DIN (DINKOOL)

(Case T-85/14) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark DINKOOL - Earlier international figurative mark DIN - Earlier national business identifier DIN - Relative grounds for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2015/C 096/24)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Infocit — Prestação de Serviços, Comércio Geral e Indústria, Lda (Luanda, Angola) (represented by: A. Oliveira, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: M. Fischer, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: DIN — Deutsches Institut für Normung eV (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: M. Bagh, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 November 2013 (Case R 1106/2012-2) concerning opposition proceedings between DIN — Deutsches Institut für Normung eV and Infocit — Prestação de Serviços, Comércio Geral e Indústria, Lda.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders Infocit — Prestação de Serviços, Comércio Geral e Indústria, Lda, to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Infocit — Prestação de Serviços, Comércio Geral e Indústria, Lda, to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).

| 3. | Orders DIN — Deutsches Institut für Normung eV to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders DIN — Deutsches Institut für Normung eV to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 135, 5.5.2014.

1

---
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7653 

AN ACT 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to update certain 

terminology regarding veteran employment. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 7653 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Employment 

3 Readiness Yield Act of 2024’’ or the ‘‘VERY Act of 

4 2024’’. 

5 SEC. 2. UPDATE OF CERTAIN TERMINOLOGY REGARDING 

6 VETERAN EMPLOYMENT. 

7 Title 38, United States Code, is amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘employment handicap’’ each 

9 place it occurs and inserting ‘‘employment barrier’’; 

10 and 

11 (2) by striking ‘‘employment handicaps’’ each 

12 place it occurs and inserting ‘‘employment barriers’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 18, 

2024. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7653 

AN ACT 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to update 

certain terminology regarding veteran employment.