alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
l/\\ ~T~* ' *=»+r-^<^+ PILED IN O0\ 4-C^^J21^ P*1^"6-1 !ST COURT OFAPPEALS

lAc^S-V0'^- ' X —l-\£><^2_°-~2~^^^ HOUSTON. TEXAS

MAR 31 2015

£> \- 15" -^

H- XZ W^>*- ^^

^-^•^^ ~-^;p> ^» ^~T~ «- <=-* ^p-c.

Ga& TIA^ t-^H
^

<5-

{•• I f. /' / ./ .•: .•> »!; j? / /

SAil

q b ^ rn tvu -^

!'•'?• PC Si

ti §'> D

o ©.• ^

£il iu j?

S 9 ^

§;, # « •^ H <r «« iV i1- =*.>. V?i .£_ «? g *~ Vf -;-. fa

;;? U Oi

4 S ja r

^?3

<r^

/3

4^

ifl

o:

N

CM

0

o

r-
POWER OF ATTORNEY

      Each Director of PSEG Energy Holdings Inc. whose  signature  appears below
hereby   appoints  Derek  M.  DiRisio  the  agent  for  service  named  in  this
Registration Statement, and James T. Foran, Esq. as attorney-in-fact, to execute
in the name of each such  person and to file with the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission this  Registration  Statement and any and all  amendments,  including
post-effective amendments to this Registration Statement.

            Signature                    Title                      Date
            ---------                    ----                       ----


      /s/ ROBERT E. BUSCH               Director              September 28, 2001
----------------------------
        Robert E. Busch


        /s/ FRANK CASSIDY               Director              September 28, 2001
----------------------------
          Frank Cassidy


  /s/ ROBERT J. DOUGHERTY, JR.          Director              September 28, 2001
----------------------------
    Robert J. Dougherty, Jr.


      /s/ E. JAMES FERLAND              Director              September 28, 2001
----------------------------
        E. James Ferland


      /s/ THOMAS M. O'FLYNN             Director              September 28, 2001
----------------------------
        Thomas M. O'Flynn


      /s/ R. EDWIN SELOVER              Director              September 28, 2001
----------------------------
        R. Edwin Selover
# C_2014135EN.01002201.xml

| 5.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 135/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 135/22

---

Action brought on 10 February 2014 — European Commission v French Republic

(Case C-63/14)

2014/C 135/26

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: B. Stromsky, Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: French Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by failing to take, within the prescribed periods, all the measures necessary to recover from the recipient the State aid declared illegal and incompatible with the internal market by Article 2(1) of Commission Decision 2013/435/EU of 2 May 2013 on State aid SA.22843 implemented by France in favour of Société Nationale Maritime Corse-Méditerranée and the Compagnie Méridionale de Navigation, (1) in not having annulled, within the prescribed periods, all the aid payments referred to in that Article 2(1) and in not having informed the Commission, within the prescribed period, of the measures taken to comply with that decision, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the fourth paragraph of Article 288 TFEU and Articles 3, 4 and 5 of that decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to take, within the prescribed periods, all the measures necessary to recover from the recipient the State aid declared illegal and incompatible with the internal market by Article 2(1) of Commission Decision 2013/435/EU of 2 May 2013 on State aid SA.22843 implemented by France in favour of Société Nationale Maritime Corse-Méditerranée and the Compagnie Méridionale de Navigation, (1) in not having annulled, within the prescribed periods, all the aid payments referred to in that Article 2(1) and in not having informed the Commission, within the prescribed period, of the measures taken to comply with that decision, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the fourth paragraph of Article 288 TFEU and Articles 3, 4 and 5 of that decision;

1

| — | order French Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order French Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The time-limit within which the French Republic should have recovered the aid illegally paid to the SNCM expired four months after notification of the decision.

---

(1)  OJ 2013 L 220, p. 20.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM WESTERN
WIRELESS CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AS OF AND FOR
THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           5,340
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   72,029
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,754
<INVENTORY>                                      8,282
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                87,969
<PP&E>                                         543,190
<DEPRECIATION>                                 251,514
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,048,436
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           73,588
<BONDS>                                      1,180,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       682,902
<OTHER-SE>                                   (889,624)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,048,436
<SALES>                                          9,872
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               252,414
<CGS>                                           15,824
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  261,775
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (52,458)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 9,371
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              46,800
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (161,532)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (60,880)
<DISCONTINUED>                               (100,652)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (161,532)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.10)


</TABLE>
Regulations to reduce volatile organic compound emissions from nonfumigant pesticide products

(DPR Regulation No. 12-001)

Enclosure 2

The e-mails and lists of e-mail addresses and the listserves they were sent to 

on the dates shown below:

• Mailing notice (April 2012) [no text available; see February 2013 as example]

• 15-day mailing notice (November 2012) [no text available; see February 2013 as example]

• Second 15-day mailing notice (February 2013)
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The Honorable Kenneth F. Ripple, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Seventh Circuit, sitting by designation. NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NORMA JUDITH PAIZ CRUZ, Petitioner,

v. ERIC H. HOLDER JR., Attorney General, Respondent. No. 06-73048 Agency No. A070-828-894

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Argued and Submitted November 3, 2010 Pasadena, California Before: PREGERSON, RIPPLE, ** and GRABER, Circuit Judges. Petitioner Norma Paiz Cruz petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ affirmance of the immigration judge’s ("IJ") denial of Petitioner’s application for cancellation of removal. Reviewing the procedural due process 

# FILED

NOV 18 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 claim de novo, Hamazaspyan v. Holder , 590 F.3d 744, 747 (9th Cir. 2009), we grant the petition. We have jurisdiction over colorable c onstitutional claims alleging a violation of procedural due process. Mendez-Castro v. Mukasey , 552 F.3d 975, 978 (9th Cir. 2009). The government’s argument that we lack jurisdiction over claims alleging substantive due process viol ations is, therefore, inapposite. The IJ permitted cross-examination of Petitioner before direct examination, disregarded evidence, prejudged issues, cut off relevant tes timony, and failed to discuss (or, apparently, even to consid er) relevant evidence. Considering "the cumulative effect of the several due pro cess violations," Zolotukhin v. Gonzales , 417 F.3d 1073, 1077 (9th Cir. 2005), we hold that "the challenged proceeding was so fundamentally unfair that the alien was prevented from reasonably presenting [her] case," Cruz Rendon v. Holder , 603 F.3d 1104, 1109 (9th Cir. 2010) (internal quotation marks omitted). Furthermore, the evidence and testimony concerned a central issue in determining Petitioner’s e ligibility for relief, namely, the hardship that her American-citizen children would su ffer; consequently, "the outcome of the proceeding may have been affected" by the IJ’s actions. Tampubolon v. Holder , 610 F.3d 1056, 1063 (9th Cir. 2010) (internal quotation marks omitted). Petition GRANTED; case REMANDED.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

               Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors

   We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-1022, 333-50619 and 333-60587) pertaining to the Visio
Corporation 1990 Stock Option Plan, the Visio Corporation 1995 Long-term
Incentive Compensation Plan, Visio Corporation 1995 Stock Option Plan for
Nonemployee Directors, and the Visio Corporation 1995 Employee Stock Purchase
Plan, and the Visio Corporation (formerly Kaspia Systems, Inc.) 1996 Stock
Option Plan of our report dated October 22, 1999, with respect to the financial
statements and schedule of Visio Corporation included in the Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended September 30, 1999.

                                          /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Seattle, Washington
December 29, 1999
PUBLIC LAW 115–287—DEC. 6, 2018 132 STAT. 4371 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4890: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018): 

July 16, considered and passed House. 

Nov. 15, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 115–287 

115th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 9801 Apollo 

Drive in Upper Marlboro, Maryland, as the ‘‘Wayne K. Curry Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. WAYNE K. CURRY POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 9801 Apollo Drive in Upper Marlboro, Maryland, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Wayne K. Curry Post Office 

Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Wayne K. Curry Post Office Building’’. 

Approved December 6, 2018. 

Dec. 6, 2018 

[H.R. 4890] 


ralbany on LAP520R082 with PUB LAWS PDF
<PAGE>   1

                         EXHIBIT 2.1 PLAN OF ACQUISITION

The Company has entered into a non-binding Letter of Intent and Term Sheet dated
February 22, 1999 between the Company's subsidiary, Alternative Materials
Technology, Inc. ("AMT USA") and U.S. Cellulose Co., Inc. ("USC"), whereby the
Company plans to acquire all of the issued and outstanding shares of USC in
consideration for $1,000,000 in cash (the "Acquisition"). USC is at arm's length
to the Company and AMT USA.

The closing of the transaction is subject to:

        (i)    The negotiation and execution of a definitive stock purchase
               agreement and other required documents in connection therewith.

        (ii)   A satisfactory due diligence review by the Company, to be
               completed within 90 days after the execution of the definitive
               agreement and approval by the Company's auditors, legal counsel,
               lenders and board of directors.

        (iii)  The Company raising sufficient capital to acquire all the
               outstanding shares in cash.

        (iv)   The approval by USC of the terms of a severance benefit plan, not
               to exceed $400,000,to be implemented by the Company for any of
               USC's employees who are not retained by the Company after the
               transaction.


The Company plans to primarily raise funds for the Acquisition through a Short
Form Offering Document and concurrently through private placement of additional
securities and the exercise by certain directors, officers and other persons of
previously issued warrants.

The Short Form Offering Document offers up to a total of 800,000 Units, at a
price of Cdn$0.80 per Unit, for maximum aggregate proceeds of Cdn$640,000, to
eligible qualified investors under the Securities Act ("British Columbia"). Each
Unit consists of one common share and one transferable purchase warrant. Two
such purchase warrants entitle a purchaser to acquire a further common share at
the price of Cdn$0.90 for twelve months following the date of issue. The
Offering will be conducted by Canaccord Capital Corporation, the Agent, on a
best efforts basis. The proposed private placement will proceed by way of
offering memorandum with the expected purchasers being eligible under the
Securities Act ("British Columbia") and of the Securities Rules ("British
Columbia"). The size of the private placement is to be up to 1,250,000 of units,
at a price of Cdn$0.80 per unit. Each unit will be comprised of one common share
and one non-transferable purchase warrant entitling the holder thereof to
acquire one additional common share at a price of Cdn$0.90 in the first year
following the closing of the private placement and at a price of Cdn$1.25 in the
second year following the closing of the private placement.

List of all omitted schedules

        (i)    Letter of Intent and Term Sheet

        (ii)   Agency Agreement

        (iii)  Short Form Offering Document

        (iv)   Offering Memorandum

The Company agrees that the aforementioned omitted schedules will be furnished.
upon written request by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 39 (Monday, March 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9181-9182]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4127]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


Secretarial Indonesia Clean Energy Business Development Mission: 
Application Deadline Extended

AGENCY: International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Timeframe for Recruitment and Applications

    Mission recruitment will be conducted in an open and public manner, 
including publication in the Federal Register, posting on the Commerce 
Department trade mission calendar (http://www.ita.doc.gov/doctm/tmcal.html) and other Internet web sites, press releases to general and 
trade media, direct mail, broadcast fax, notices by industry trade 
associations and other multiplier groups, and publicity at industry 
meetings, symposia, conferences, and trade shows. The Commerce 
Department's Office of Business Liaison and the International Trade 
Administration will explore and welcome outreach assistance from other 
interested organizations, including other U.S. Government agencies.
    Recruitment for this mission will begin immediately upon approval. 
Applications can be completed on-line at the Clean Energy Business 
Development Missions' Web site at http://www.trade.gov/CleanEnergyMission or can be obtained by contacting the U.S. Department 
of Commerce Office of Business Liaison (202-482-1360 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#86c5eae3e7e8c3e8e3f4e1ffcbeff5f5efe9e8c6e2e9e5a8e1e9f0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="edae81888c83a883889f8a94a0849e9e848283ad89828ec38a829b">[email protected]</span></a>). The application deadline has been extended 
to Friday, March 12, 2010. Completed applications should be submitted 
to the Office of Business Liaison. Applications received after Friday, 
March 12, 2010 will be considered only if space and scheduling 
constraints permit.

Contacts

    The Office of Business Liaison, 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW., Room 
5062, Washington, DC 20230, Tel: 202-482-

[[Page 9182]]

1360, Fax: 202-482-4054, E-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#91d2fdf4f0ffd4fff4e3f6e8dcf8e2e2f8feffd1f5fef2bff6fee7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6b28070e0a052e050e190c12260218180204052b0f0408450c041d">[email protected]</span></a>.

Sean Timmins,
Global Trade Programs, Commercial Service Trade Missions Program.
[FR Doc. 2010-4127 Filed 2-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### Urban growth and the water regimen

By: John SaviniJ.C. Kammerer

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1591A

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.02


                              ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Ribi ImmunoChem Research, Inc.


We consent to the use of our report and to the reference to our firm under the
heading "Experts" included herein.

                                 KPMG LLP

Billings, Montana
June 28, 1999
§ 520.2335 Telmisartan. ( a ) *Specifications.* Each milliliter of solution contains 10 milligrams (mg) telmisartan.
( b ) *Sponsor.* See No. 000010 in § 510.600(c) of this chapter.
( c ) *Conditions of use* — ( 1 ) *Amount.* Administer 1.5 mg/kilogram (kg) (0.68 mg/pound (lb)) orally twice daily for 14 days, followed by 2 mg/kg (0.91 mg/lb) orally once daily.
( 2 ) *Indications for use.* For the control of systemic hypertension in cats.
( 3 ) *Limitations.* Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian.
[83 FR 64740, Dec. 18, 2018]
Editorial Note on Part 184
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 184 appear at 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; and 81 FR 49897, July 29, 2016.

§ 184.1195 Calcium citrate. ( a ) Calcium citrate (Ca3(C6H5O7)2·4H2O, CAS Reg. No. 813-0994-095) is the calcium salt of citric acid. It is prepared by neutralizing citric acid with calcium hydroxide or calcium carbonate. It occurs as a fine white, odorless powder and usually contains four moles of water per mole of calcium citrate.
( b ) The ingredient meets the specifications of the Food Chemicals Codex, 3d ed. (1981), pp. 49 and 50, which is incorporated by reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies are available from the National Academy Press, 2101 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20418, and the Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-200), 5001 Campus Dr., College Park, MD 20740, or may be examined at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .*
( c ) In accordance with § 184.1(b)(1), the ingredient is used in food with no limitation other than current good manufacturing practice. Calcium citrate may also be used in infant formula in accordance with section 412(g) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) or with regulations promulgated under section 412(a)(2) of the act.
( d ) Prior sanctions for this ingredient different from the uses established in this section do not exist or have been waived.
[59 FR 63896, Dec. 12, 1994]
#### Jose Luis LOPEZ-ZAMORA, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-74435.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct 11, 2005.*

Decided Oct. 19, 2005.

Michael Franquinha, Law Office of Michael Franquinha, Phoenix, AZ, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, District Counsel, Office of the District Chief Counsel U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Phoenix, AZ, William Nixon, Dustin Pead, U.S. Attorney’s Office Assistants U.S. Attorney, Salt Lake City, UT, for Respondent.

Before: HALL, T.G. NELSON, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Luis Lopez-Zamora, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ summary affirmance of an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for withholding of removal. We have jurisdic*545tion pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the IJ’s factual findings, *Lim v. INS,*224 F.3d 929, 933 (9th Cir.2000), and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s finding that Lopez-Zamora failed to qualify for withholding of removal because Lopez-Zamora testified that the gang members that attacked him were not associated with the government and that he did not report the attack to the police. *See Castro-Perez v. Gonzales,*409 F.3d 1069, 1072 (9th Cir.2005) (indicating that failure to inform the government of an incident of persecution committed by a private actor undercuts the conclusion that the government is unwilling or unable to control the private actor’s attempts at persecution).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.