alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2019290EN.01001701.xml

| 11.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 290/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 290/17

---

COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2019/1884

of 8 November 2019

amending Decision (CFSP) 2016/2382

establishing a European Security and Defence College (ESDC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Articles 28(1), 42(4) and 43(2) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 21 December 2016, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2016/2382 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 21 December 2016, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2016/2382 (1).

| (2) | A new financial reference amount for the period from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2020 should be established. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A new financial reference amount for the period from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2020 should be established.

| (3) | Decision (CFSP) 2016/2382 should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Decision (CFSP) 2016/2382 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Article 16(2) of Decision (CFSP) 2016/2382 is replaced by the following:

‘2.   The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure of the ESDC during the period from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2020 shall be EUR 1 893 598.

The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure of the ESDC for subsequent periods shall be decided by the Council.’.

Article 2

Entry into force

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 8 November 2019.

For the Council

The President

M. LINTILÄ

---

(1)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/2382 of 21 December 2016 establishing a European Security and Defence College (ESDC) and repealing Decision 2013/189/CFSP (OJ L 352, 23.12.2016, p. 60).

1

---
Product Specifications 

H920 Tornado 

• Flight Time 24 min 

• Dimension 31.4x36.2x18.1in (797x920x461mm) 

• Diagonal Length Without Rotor Blades 36.2 in(920mm) 

• Propeller/Main Rotor Diameter 17.3 in (440mm) 

• Weight with GB603, GH4 Camera and Battery 176.4 oz (5000g) 

• Battery LiPo 6s 

• Charger 6S 22.2V LiPo DC Balancing Smart Charger with AC Adapter 

(included) 

• Transmitter 24-channel 2.4GHz with 5.8GHz video downlink 

(included) 

• 4 Flight Modes Smart,Angle,Throttle,and Home Modes 

• Maximum Flying Height (Absolute altitude) 4000m (13124 ft) 

• Maximum Flying Height (Relative altitude) 1000m (3281 ft) 

• Maximum Rotation Rate 100°/S 

• Maximum RoLL Angle 35° 

• Maximum Horizontal Speed 21m/s 47MPH 75 KPH (5kg, throttle) 

• Radio Control Frequency Band 2.4GHz 

• Operating Temperature Range 05"C to 80"C 

• Operating System AndroidTM 

• Number of Channels 24 

• Control Transmission Distance/Range (Optimum Conditions) 2km 

• Robust Radio Control Modulation Yuneec Protocol 

• Video Link Frequency Band 5.8GHz 

• Video Transmission Distance/Range (Optimum Conditions) FCC 

Compliance: Up to 600m (1968.5 ft) CE Compliance: Up to 300m 

(984.252 ft) 

• Flight Systems Telemetry Data On Screen Display (OSD) Yes 

• LED Backlit LCD Screen 7" 
• Tactile (Vibrating) and Audible Feedback Yes 

• Built-In LiPo Battery Voltage I Capacity 8700mah Li-ion 1s 

• Charger Smart Balance Charge 

• Weight Without camera: 31.4 oz(890g}/With camera: 56.5 oz (1600g) 

• Dimension 6.5x8.6x7.7in (165x219x196mm) 

• Control Angle Accuracy ±0.02° · 

• Maxumum Control Range Pitch : between -30° and 100° Roll: 

between -30°and 30° Yaw : between ooand 360° 

• Mechanical Range Pitch : between -120oand 45° Roll : between40°and 40° Yaw : between oo and 360° 

• Maximum Control Speed Pitch : 30°/S Yaw: 30°/S 

• Dimension 6.9x4.9x8.1in (175x125x205mm) 

• Weight 26.5oz (750g) 

• Focusing System 18x Optical Zoom 

• Field Of View 54.8° (For Wide-Angle) 

• Video Transmission Range Up to 1000m 

• Video Resolution FULL HD 1080p 30FPS 

• Photo Resolution 2 Megapixels 

• Storage(memory) Micro SO Class 10, 4-32GB 

• Control Angle Accuracy ±0.02° 

• White Balance Automatic White Balance 

• Transmission System 5.8GHz 

• Input/Operating Voltage 13V to 30V 

• Working Temperature o·c to 50'C 

• Storage Temperature -20'C to 60'C 

• Angular Vibration Range ±0.02° 

• Control Range between -100° and 30° Yaw : between oo and 360° 

• Maximum Control Speed Pitch : 30°/S Yaw: 35°/S 

/.block
§ 520.2150 Stanozolol. ( a ) *Specifications.* Each tablet or chewable tablet contains 2 milligrams stanozolol.
( b ) *Sponsor.* No. 054771 in § 510.600(c) of this chapter.
( c ) *Conditions of use in dogs and cats* — ( 1 ) *Amount* — ( i ) *Dogs:* Administered orally to small breeds, 1 ⁄ 2 to 1 tablet twice daily for several weeks; to large breeds, 1 to 2 tablets twice daily for several weeks. The tablets may be crushed and administered in feed.
( ii ) *Cats:* Administered orally 1 ⁄ 2 to 1 tablet twice daily for several weeks.
( 2 ) *Indications for use.* As an anabolic steroid treatment.
( 3 ) *Limitations.* Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian.
[79 FR 28828, May 20, 2014]
# C_2014439EN.01002302.xml

| 8.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 439/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 439/23

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia of Castilla La Mancha (Spain) lodged on 2 October 2014 — Manuel Orrego Arias v Subdelegación del Gobierno en Ciudad Real

(Case C-456/14)

(2014/C 439/31)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal Superior de Justicia of Castilla La Mancha

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Manuel Orrego Arias

Applicant:

Defendant: Subdelegación del Gobierno en Ciudad Real

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

The interpretation of the first paragraph of Article 3(1)(a) of Council Directive 2001/40/EC (1) of 28 May, and in particular on whether the term ‘offence punishable by a penalty involving deprivation of liberty of at least one year’, set out in that provision, refers to the penalty prescribed in abstracto for the offence in question or, on the contrary, to the actual term of imprisonment imposed on the convicted person and, in consequence, whether or not the decision of a Member State to expel a national of a third country sentenced to imprisonment of eight months would be recognised by other Member States.

1

in abstracto

---

(1)  Council Directive 2001/40/EC of 28 May 2001 on the mutual recognition of decisions on the expulsion of third country nationals

1

(OJ L 149, p. 34).

---
#### § 133.103 Asiago medium cheese.

Asiago medium cheese conforms to the definition and standard of identity and is subject to the requirements for label statement of ingredients prescribed by § 133.102 for asiago fresh cheese, except that it contains not more than 35 percent moisture, its solids contain not less than 45 percent of milkfat, and it is cured for not less than 6 months.

[58 FR 2892, Jan. 6, 1993]
§ 520.1242e Levamisole hydrochloride effervescent tablets. ( a ) *Specifications.* Each tablet contains 907 milligrams of levamisole hydrochloride.
( b ) *Sponsor.* See No. 054771 in § 510.600(c) of this chapter.
( c ) *Related tolerances.* See § 556.350 of this chapter.
( d ) *Conditions of use.* It is used for swine as follows: ( 1 ) *Amount.* The equivalent of 8 milligrams of levamisole hydrochloride per kilogram of body weight, as a single dose.
( 2 ) *Indications for use.* See § 520.1242a(f)(3)(ii).
( 3 ) *Limitations.* Withholding water from pigs before treatment is not necessary. Add one tablet for each 21 ⁄ 2 gallons of water; mix thoroughly. Allow 1 gallon of medicated water for each 100 pounds body weight of pigs to be treated. No other source of water should be offered. After pigs have consumed medicated water, resume use of regular water. Pigs maintained under conditions of constant worm exposure may require re-treatment within 4 to 5 weeks. Consult your veterinarian before administering to sick swine. Consult your veterinarian for assistance in the diagnosis, treatment, and control of parasitism. Do not administer within 72 hours of slaughter for food.
[45 FR 6087, Jan. 25, 1980, as amended at 67 FR 63055, Oct. 10, 2002; 78 FR 28823, May 20, 2014]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SDW WARREN
HOLDINGS CORPORATION'S (THE "COMPANY") CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR 
THE YEAR ENDED 9/27/95 AND BALANCE SHEET AS OF 9/27/95 FOUND ON PAGES 14 AND 
15, RESPECTIVELY, OF THE COMPANY'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10K/A FOR THE YEAR 
ENDED 9/27/95 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL 
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-27-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-05-1994
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1995
<CASH>                                          62,200
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  135,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (5,600)
<INVENTORY>                                    226,500
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               462,300
<PP&E>                                       1,215,700
<DEPRECIATION>                                  65,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,887,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          284,400
<BONDS>                                      1,048,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           74,500
<PREFERRED>                                     42,100
<COMMON>                                           300
<OTHER-SE>                                     322,700
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,887,300
<SALES>                                      1,155,800
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,155,800
<CGS>                                          886,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  886,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               200,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             106,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 70,800
<INCOME-TAX>                                    28,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             33,300
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    33,300
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .80
        

</TABLE>
# L_2019075DE.01013701.xml

| 19.3.2019 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 75/137 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2019

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 75/137

---

Berichtigung der Durchführungsrichtlinie (EU) 2019/68 der Kommission vom 16. Januar 2019 zur Festlegung technischer Spezifikationen für die Kennzeichnung von Feuerwaffen und deren wesentlichen Bestandteilen gemäß der Richtlinie 91/477/EWG des Rates über die Kontrolle des Erwerbs und des Besitzes von Waffen

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 15 vom 17. Januar 2019
  )

Auf Seite 18, Erwägungsgrund 1 Satz 1:

Anstatt:

„Gemäß Artikel 4 Absatz 1 der Richtlinie 91/477/EWG stellen die Mitgliedstaaten sicher, dass jede Feuerwaffe oder jeder wesentliche Bestandteil, die bzw. der in Verkehr gebracht wird, mit einer lesbaren, dauerhaften und eindeutigen Kennzeichnung versehen wird.“

muss es heißen:

„Gemäß Artikel 4 Absatz 1 der Richtlinie 91/477/EWG stellen die Mitgliedstaaten sicher, dass jede Feuerwaffe und jeder wesentliche Bestandteil, der entweder als Teil einer Feuerwaffe oder als Einzelteil in Verkehr gebracht wird, mit einer lesbaren, dauerhaften und eindeutigen Kennzeichnung versehen wird.“

---
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

IN RE FINJAN, INC.

______________________ 

2011-1542

(Reexamination No. 90/008,684)

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

PAUL J. ANDRE, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel 

LLP, of Menlo Park, California, argued for appellant. 

With him on the brief were LISA KOBIALKA and JAMES R.

HANNAH. 

NATHAN K. KELLEY, Associate Solicitor, United States 

Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, 

argued for Director of the United States Patent and 

Trademark Office. On the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN, 

Solicitor, and COKE MORGAN STEWART and ROBERT J.

MCMANUS, Associate Solicitors.

______________________ 
THIS CAUSE HAVING BEEN HEARD AND CONSIDERED, IT IS

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

 PER CURIAM (MOORE, BRYSON, AND O’MALLEY, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 January 11, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

 Date Jan Horbaly 

 Clerk
# C_2014303EN.01001601.xml

| 8.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 303/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/16

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny (Poland) lodged on 5 June 2014 — Gmina Wrocław v Minister Finansów

(Case C-276/14)

2014/C 303/20

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Referring court

Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Gmina Wrocław

Appellant:

Respondent: Minister Finansów

Respondent:

Question referred

Question referred

In the light of Article 4(2), in conjunction with Article 5(3), of the Treaty on European Union, may an organisational entity of a municipality (a local government body in Poland) be regarded as a taxable person for purposes of VAT when it engages in activities other than as a public authority within the meaning of Article 13 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, (1) notwithstanding the fact that it does not satisfy the criterion of autonomy (independence) set out in Article 9(1) of that directive?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.

1

---
§ 207.61 How is registration and listing information provided to FDA? ( a ) *Electronic format.* ( 1 ) Except as provided in § 207.65, all information submitted under this part must be transmitted to FDA in electronic format by using our electronic drug registration and listing system, in a form that we can process, review, and archive. We may periodically issue guidance on how to provide registration and listing information in electronic format (specifying for example method of transmission, media, file formats, preparation, and organization of files).
( 2 ) Information provided in electronic format must comply with part 11 of this chapter, except as follows: ( i ) Advertisements and labeling, including the content of labeling, required under this part are exempt from the requirements in § 11.10(a), (c) through (h), and (k) of this chapter and the corresponding requirements in § 11.30 of this chapter.
( ii ) All other information submitted under this part is exempt from the requirements in § 11.10(b), (c), and (e) of this chapter and the corresponding requirements in § 11.30 of this chapter.
( b ) *English language.* Drug establishment registration and drug listing information must be provided in the English language. The content of labeling must be provided at a minimum in the English language. Where § 201.15(c) of this chapter permits product labeling solely in a foreign language, the content of labeling must be submitted in that language along with an accurate English translation.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134023 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 134023 

 COA: 276490 

Oakland CC: 2005-205564-FC 

ANGEL HERIBERTO LUGO,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 4, 2007 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0830 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 10, 2007 

 Clerk
June 1, 2015

Mr. Alex Lazzarinetti Dragonfly Visuals, LLC

619 Moss Circle Placentia, CA 92870

Dear Mr. Lazzarinetti:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your April 30, 2015, exemption request on behalf into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-1372), but we are unable to pr ocess your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
Steve luff

Rio Bravo Jasmin

19100 Von Karman, Suite 570

Irvine, CA 92612

Re: Completeness Determination for Clean Air Act (CAA) Prevention of SignificantDeterioration (PSD) Permit Modification for Rio Bravo Jasmin (Jasmin)Dear Mr. luff:

This letter concerns the application completeness status of Rio Bravo Jasmin’s application for a

modification to PSD Permit #SJ 85-07 issued to Rio Bravo Refining Company (Rio Bravo) OflAugust 19, 1986. The application requests that Jasmin be permitted to burn clean cellulosic

biomass in addition to the currently permitted fuels of natural gas, coal, petroleum coke and tirederived fuel.

The first PSD application materials were dated and received by this office on May 17, 2010.These materials and supplemental information provided by Rio Bravo were necessary for

85-07 on December13, 2010 and

August 29, 2011. Additional information relating to this modification was submitted onnumerous occasions. Pursuant to 40 CFR 124.3, EPA determined the application to be complete

on February 24, 2012.

If you should have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Orner Shalev at (415)

972-3538.

Sincerely,

M

.

Gerardo C.’ ios,Chief, Permits Omce

cc: Dr. Ted Guth

Maynard Adams, Rio Bravo Jasmin

Bill Rossiter, Rio Bravo Jasmin
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

Y.D., the Mother, and T.C., the Father
, Appellant s ,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, and

STATEWIDE GUARDIAN AD LITEM OFFICE
, Appellee s

.

No s . 4D 23

- 182 and 4D23

- 279

[ June 15, 2023 ]

Consolidated a ppeal s from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Roger B. Colton, Senior Judge; L.T. Case No.

50

- 2020

- DP

- 000839

- XXXX

- MB

.

Ilene F. Tuckfield of Ilene F. Tuckfield, P.A., Coral Gables, for appellant

Y .D., the Mother.

Andrew A. Holness of the Law Offices of Andrew A. Holness, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant T.C., the Father.

Andrew Feigenbaum of Children ’ s Legal Services, West Palm Beach, for appellee Department of Children and Families.

Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Sarah Todd Weitz, Senior Attorney, Appellate Division of the Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, for appellee Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

W ARNER
, M AY and G ERBER , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
§ 522.56 Amikacin. ( a ) *Specifications.* Each milliliter of solution contains 50 milligrams (mg) of amikacin as amikacin sulfate.
( b ) *Sponsor.* See No. 069043 in § 510.600(c) of this chapter.
( c ) *Conditions of use in dogs* — ( 1 ) *Amount.* 5 mg/pound (lb) of body weight twice daily by intramuscular or subcutaneous injection.
( 2 ) *Indications for use.* For treatment of genitourinary tract infections (cystitis) caused by susceptible strains of *Escherichia coli* and *Proteus* spp. and skin and soft tissue infections caused by susceptible strains of *Pseudomonas* spp. and *E. coli.*
( 3 ) *Limitations.* Do not use in horses intended for human consumption. Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian.
[76 FR 17338, Mar. 29, 2011, as amended at 78 FR 17597, Mar. 22, 2013; 79 FR 16183, Mar. 25, 2014; 81 FR 17608, Mar. 30, 2016]
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7385 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 29 Franklin Street in Petersburg, Virginia, 

as the ‘‘John Mercer Langston Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 7385 EH

1 SECTION 1. JOHN MERCER LANGSTON POST OFFICE 

2 BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 29 Franklin Street in Peters5 burg, Virginia, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘John Mercer Langston Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘John Mercer 

11 Langston Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 22, 2024. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7385 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostLangston Post Office Building’’. tersburg, Virginia, as the ‘‘John Mercer al Service located at 29 Franklin Street in Pe-