Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinionshould not * be publishe d an d is not precedent except under the limited circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 41020 Su m m ar y Cal endar

UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee

v. J AMI L E NI CO L E W I L S ON D e fe nda nt
- Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e E aster n D i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 4: 07- C R

- 235

B ef ore JO L L Y , B E N AV ID E S , an d H AY N E S , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * Jam i l e N i col e W i l son ap pea l s hi s s en t e n ce f ol l ow i n g h i s gui l t y pl ea c o nvi c t i o n f

o rpo s s e s s i o n w i t h i nt e nt t o di s t r ibut e o rdi s pe ns e c o c ai ne b as e . The di s t r i c tc o ur t ’ s a ppl i e d t he c ar e e ro f fe nde rg ui de l i ne und e rU
. S. S. G

. § 4 B1. 1 and sentenced W i l son to 188 m on t h s of i m pri son m e n t a n d f ive years of

sup ervi sed rel ease. W i l son con te n d s th at t h e di st ri ctcourterr ed byi m posi n g t h e career of fenderenhance m entunder § 4 B 1. 1. United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D June 15, 2 009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 08- 41020

2 Adef enda n t is a ca r ee rof fenderunder § 4 B 1. 1 i f “ ( 1) t he def

endantw as atl eas te i ght e e n y e ar s o l d a tt he t i m e t he de fe nda ntc o m m i t t e d t he i ns t ant of fen se of convi ct i on , ( 2) t h e i n st an tof fen se of convic t i on i s a fel on y t h at i s ei t h er a c r i m e of

vi ol enc e ora c ont r ol l ed subs t ance of fens e, an d ( 3) the def endanthas at l east t w o pri or fel on y convic t i on s of ei t h er a cri m e of vi ol en ce ora contr ol l ed
su b stan ce offen se.” § 4B 1
. 1 (a ). W i l son ch a l l en ge s on l y th e th i rd elem en t, argu i n g t h at t h e di st ri ctcourterr ed byapp lyin gth e careerof fen der
e n h a n c e me n tb a s e d s o l e l yo n h i s p r e s e n t e n c e r e p o r t ’ s c h a r a c t e r i z a t i o n o f t h e t wo pri or c on vi ct i on s un derl yi n g t h e enh an cem en t , a T exas conv i ct i on forbu rgl ary of a ha bi t ati on w i t h intended other fel on y an d a federalconvi ct i on f or c on spi racy t o m an u fact u re, di st ribu t e, or possess w i t h i n t en t t o m an u fact u re, di st ribu t e, or di spen se c ocai n e base. W hi l e t he di s t r i c tc o ur tw as no tpr o vi de d m at e r i al s i nde pe nde ntf r o m t he pres e n t en ce r eport docu m en t i n g t h ese pri or c on vi ct i on s, W i l son’ s c ou n sel ad m i t t e d at s e nt e nc i ng t hat W i l s o n w as i n fac t c o nvi c t e d o f t he bur gl ary and conspir acy of

fen ses. Th e di st ri ctcourtw as perm i t t ed to rel y on t h i s adm i ssi on i n deter m i n i n g t h at t h ose c on vi ct i on s c ou l d be u sed as a basi s t o enh an ce W ils o n ’ s s e n te n c e . Se eUni t e d St at e s v . Je nki ns , 487 F
. 3d 279 , 281 ( 5th C i r. 2 0 0 7 ); Un i t ed S t ate s v. Mend oza- S an chez , 4 5 6 F .3d 4 7 9 , 4 8 3 (5t h C ir. 2 0 0 6 ). A f t erf il i ng a w r it t en o bj ec t i on ch a l l en gin g W i l son ’ s bu rg l a ryconvi c t i on “ as a ba s i s f

o r a s s e r t i n g h e i s a c a r e e r o f fe n d e r , ” W i l s o n ’ s c o u n s e l c o n c e d e d a t t he sentenci n g h eari n g t h at W i l son’ s burgl ary an d consp i racy convi ct i on s s ati sf i ed t he r e qui r e m e nt s o f

t he c ar e e ro f

fe nde rg ui de l i ne , s t at i ng, “Yes , s t at ut o r i l y and p u r suant t o t he se nt enc i ng gui del i nes t hos e w oul d qual i f y, I c an’ t ar gu e w i th t h at. ” I n l i gh tof

t h i s c on cess i on , W il so n w ai ved t h e i ssue w h et h er t h ose convi c t i o ns fal lw i t hi n t he de f i ni t i o n o f

“ c r i m e o f

v i o l e nc e ” o r“ c o nt r o l l ed
s u b s ta n c e o ffe n s e ” fo rp u r p o s e s o f th e ca r e e ro ffe n d e re n h a n c e m e n t. S ee Un i t ed St at e s v . Salaz ar , 5 4 2 F .3 d 1 3 9 , 1 4 5 -4 6 (5 th C ir . 2 0 0 8 ), cer t
. den i ed , 12 9 S

. C t. 1669 ( 2009)

. W i l so n al so br i efs no s uch ar gum ent in th i s cou r tand t hus hasN o. 08- 41020

3 w a iv e d a n ys u c h ch a lle n g e h e r e . Se eUni t e d St at e s v . Edw ar ds , 303 F. 3d 606, 6 4 7 (5t h C ir. 2 0 0 2 ). AF F I RMED.