Facility_Information

facility_id utility_codelegal_owner_nam legl_operator_name e legal_address_ty legal_address pe legal_city legal_state legal_zip

10784 10784 Colstrip Energy Rosebud Operating Services, Inc. Limited Parnership legal owner1087 West River Street, Ste 200 Boise ID 83702

Page 1
Facility_Information

plant_namephysical_address phyical_cityphysical_statephysical_zipmailing_address mailing_citymailing_statemailing_zip

Colstrip Energy 18 Snider Subdivision Road LP Colstrip MT 59323 PO Box 189Colstrip MT 59323

Page 2
Facility_Information

RFA_small_entity ff_fired_coalff_fired_oil ff_fired_ngasff_fired_petcoke ff_fired_other ff_permitted_coal ff_permitted_oil ff_permitted_ngas

Yes TRUE TRUE FALSE FALSE FALSE TRUE TRUE FALSE

Page 3
Facility_Information

ff_permitted_petcoke ff_permitted_other deviation_reporting continuous_emissions cem_providedfacility_note

FALSE FALSE Reporting is required per the Title V and PSD permits. Reports are required for malfunctions per the MoNo Montana Department of Environmental Quality Regarding "operating steam reheat temperature" and "deisgn steam  (& EPA Region 8, we presume) 

Page 4
Facility_Information

eat temperature" and "deisgn steam reheat temperature" in the boiler tab (Part I), this steam turbine too small and this parameter does not ap

Page 5
Facility_Information

small and this parameter does not apply. -Stack diameter, height and flow rates are approximate.-The facility burns 

Page 6
Facility_Information

ate.-The facility burns coal (sub-bit) and coal refuse. There is no way to determine the % of coal waste vs run-of-mine coal dur

Page 7
Facility_Information

of coal waste vs run-of-mine coal during any given stack test. Both coal is unloaded via truck and transported to the large surge (day) bin. It i

Page 8
Facility_Information

orted to the large surge (day) bin. It is fed to the boiler via a single, non discriminatory, system. The % coal refuse vs. % coal figures provide

Page 9
Facility_Information

oal refuse vs. % coal figures provided for the stack tests are based on the average annual ratio of these fuels throughout the year. -

Page 10
Facility_Information

e fuels throughout the year. -The stack temperatures for all testing at this facility exeeded 300 oF, therefore a value of "1" was 

Page 11
Facility_Information

300 oF, therefore a value of "1" was entered for each case (per instructions in FAQ EICR-020). The correct numbers (in degrees F) are:2

Page 12
Facility_Information

rect numbers (in degrees F) are:2005 test = 3212006 test = 3352007 test = 3342008 test = 3502009 test = 335-

Page 13
Facility_Information

 3502009 test = 335-The % fuel on BTU basis in the "Facility

Page 14
facility_contacts

facility_id contact_id contact_titlecontact_namecontact_phone1 contact_phone2 contact_email contact_primary

10784 1 Plant Engineer Jim Geslin 4067484729104 jimg@rosi-colstrip.com TRUE

10784 2 Engineer Scott Siddoway 2083443570 scott.siddowayFALSE @rosi-boise.com

10784 3 Consultant Hal Robbins4064425768 hrobbins@bison-eng.com FALSE

Page 15
facility_coal_utilized

facility_id coal_type percentage_mass percentage_btu synfuel_typecoal_note

10784 coal refuse 90.9 90.1

10784 subbituminous 9.1 9.9

Page 16
facility_oil_utilized

facility_id oil_type percentage_volume percentage_btu other_type

10784 No.2 Fuel Oil (distillate) 100 100

Page 17
facility_other_materials

facility_id other_material permitted_burn actually_burnother_quantity other_quantity other_note _units rcra_utilize rcra_explain

Page 18
facility_other_materials

rcra_explain

Page 19
boiler_information

facility_id boiler_id boiler_type boiler_otherbottom_design design_fuelheat_input max_heat_input MWe_capacity

10784 BLR1 Fluidized bed firing Dry Bottomwaste coal 543 635 44

Page 20
boiler_information

MWe_net_capacity design_gross_efficiency operating_gross_efficiency design_pressure operating_pressure design_tempoperating_temp design_reheat_multiple design_reheat_temp1

37 85 82 1300 1275 955 955 FALSE

Page 21
boiler_information

design_reheat_temp2 operating_reheat_multiple operating_reheat_temp1 operating_reheat_temp2 hours_operatedvg_capacityapplicable_NSPS _factor retirement_yretirement_y ear ear_CBI

FALSE 8058 88.7 Subpart Da(1) FALSE

Page 22
boiler_information

NOx_controlSO2_controlcombustion_additives

No Yes Yes

Page 23
boiler_fuels

facility_id boiler_id fuel_type fuel_year percentage_massvol percentage_btu other_type

10784 BLR1 coal - subbituminous 2007 6.8 7.6

10784 BLR1 coal - subbituminous 2008 10 11

10784 BLR1 coal - subbituminous 2009 9.1 9.8

10784 BLR1 coal refuse 2007 93 92.2

10784 BLR1 coal refuse 2008 89.8 88.9

10784 BLR1 coal refuse 2009 90.5 89.8

10784 BLR1 oil - distillate 2007 0.2 0.2

10784 BLR1 oil - distillate 2008 0.2 0.1

10784 BLR1 oil - distillate 2009 0.4 0.4

Page 24
boiler_control_NOx

facility_id boiler_id NOx_type NOx_other NOx_online

Page 25
boiler_control_SO2

facility_id boiler_id SO2_type SO2_other SO2_online

10784 BLR1 Limestone injection to fluidized bed-fired furnace 6/1/1990

Page 26
boiler_additives

facility_id boiler_id boiler_additive additive_other additive_online

10784 BLR1 Additive use for mercury12/1/2009 control (e.g., bromine)

Page 27
facility_units

facility_id unit_id

10784 10874

Page 28
unit_boilers

facility_id unit_id boiler_id

10784 10874 BLR1

Page 29
facility_controls

facility_id control_id control_groupcontrol_typecontrol_otherlegacy_control cntrol_onlinecontrol_offlineNOx_reagent

10784 Baghouse PM control Fabric Filter, pulse FALSE 6/1/1990

10784 Hg SorbentOther control Activated carbon injectionFALSE 12/1/2009

Page 30
facility_controls

reagent_other NOx_ammonia SO2_sorbent oher_sorbent SO2_scrubber_additive

Page 31
facility_sampling_ports

facility_id sampling_port_id

10784 sample_ports-1

Page 32
facility_stacks

facility_id stack_id stack_heightstack_diameter sack_gas_velocity

10784 Main Stack 200 8.25 73

Page 33
configurations

facility_id configuration_id

10784 Config1

Page 34
configuration_components

facility_id configuration_id component_idorder component_ty port_near pe

10784 Config1 10874 1 Unit

10784 Config1 Baghouse 2 PM control

10784 Config1 Main Stack 4 Stack

10784 Config1 sample_ports-1 3 Sampling Port next

Page 35
configuration_pollutants1

facility_id configuration_id pollutant_nampermit_ty e pe_1emlimit_1 emlimit_units_1 avg_period_1emlimit_2 emlimit_units_2

10784 Config1 PM (Filterable) PSD and Title V (state-issued; federally 0.03 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) stack test enforceable)

10784 Config1 PM10 (Filterable) PSD and Title V (state-issued; federally 6 pound per hour (lb/hr) 1 hour enforceable)144 pounds per day

10784 Config1 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) PSD and Title V (state-issued; federally 574 pound per hour (lb/hr) 1 hour enforceable)432 pounds per 3-hours

10784 Config1 Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) PSD and Title V (state-issued; federally 328 pound per hour (lb/hr) 3 hours enforceable)7864 pounds per day

10784 Config1 Carbon Monoxide (CO) PSD and Title V (state-issued; federally 53 pound per hour (lb/hr) 1 hour enforceable)1272 pounds per day

10784 Config1 Total MercuryTitle V (state issued, federal enforceable) (Hgt) 0.9 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) annual

Page 36
configuration_pollutants1

avg_period_2emlimit_3 emlimit_units_3 avg_period_3emlimit_4 emlimit_units_4 avg_period_4emlimit_details test_method

Limits in both PSD and Title V permit: specific Method 5 per Subpart Da

24 hours 26.28 tons per year (tons/y annual r) Limits in both PSD and Title V permit: method Method 201A 

3 hours 5.04 pounds per day 24 hours 1840 tons per year (tons/y annual r) Limits in both PSD and Title V permit: Subpar

24 hours 1435 tons per year (tons/y annual r) Limits in both PSD and Title V permit: Subpar

24 hours 232 tons per year (tons/y annual r) Limits in both PSD and Title V permit

Limits in both PSD and Title V permit: Alterna

Page 37
configuration_pollutants1

emrate emrate_unitsguarantee_level_explainreq_monitoringeq_recordkeeping req_reporting

6 pound per hour (lb/hr) No As required stack test All source test recordkeeping shall be performed in accordance with tAny compliance source test reports must be submitted in 

0 pound per hour (lb/hr) No There were no guarantees for PM10 as required in this value (field). However, the input progAnnual stack testing;CAM monitoring All source test recordkeeping shall be performed in accordance with tAny compliance source test reports must be submitted in 

429 pound per hour (lb/hr) No CEM and RATA All source test recordkeeping shall be performed in accordance with tAny compliance source test reports must be submitted in 

328 pound per hour (lb/hr) No CEM and RATA All source test recordkeeping shall be performed in accordance with tAny compliance source test reports must be submitted in 

53 pound per hour (lb/hr) No As required stack test All source test recordkeeping shall be performed in accordance with tAny compliance source test reports must be submitted in 

0 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) No There were no guarantees for Hg as required in this value (field). However, the input program MEMS (mercury All source test recordkeeping shall be performed in accordance with t emissions monitoring sy Any compliance source test reports must be submitted in stem) 

Page 38
configuration_pollutants1

ce test reports must be submitted in accordance with the Montana Source Test Protocol and Procedures Manual;Excess emission report

ce test reports must be submitted in accordance with the Montana Source Test Protocol and Procedures Manual;Excess emission report

ce test reports must be submitted in accordance with the Montana Source Test Protocol and Procedures Manual;Excess emission report

ce test reports must be submitted in accordance with the Montana Source Test Protocol and Procedures Manual;Excess emission report

ce test reports must be submitted in accordance with the Montana Source Test Protocol and Procedures Manual;Excess emission report

ce test reports must be submitted in accordance with the Montana Source Test Protocol and Procedures Manual;Excess emission report

Page 39
configuration_pollutants1

s Manual;Excess emission reports and the results of inspections and audits, as required in Appendix E, shall be submitted quarterly to th

s Manual;Excess emission reports and the results of inspections and audits, as required in Appendix E, shall be submitted quarterly to th

s Manual;Excess emission reports and the results of inspections and audits, as required in Appendix E, shall be submitted quarterly to th

s Manual;Excess emission reports and the results of inspections and audits, as required in Appendix E, shall be submitted quarterly to th

s Manual;Excess emission reports and the results of inspections and audits, as required in Appendix E, shall be submitted quarterly to th

s Manual;Excess emission reports and the results of inspections and audits, as required in Appendix E, shall be submitted quarterly to th

Page 40
configuration_pollutants1

 E, shall be submitted quarterly to the Department; The annual compliance certification required by Section V.B must contain a certificatio

 E, shall be submitted quarterly to the Department; The annual compliance certification required by Section V.B must contain a certificatio

 E, shall be submitted quarterly to the Department; The annual compliance certification required by Section V.B must contain a certificatio

 E, shall be submitted quarterly to the Department; The annual compliance certification required by Section V.B must contain a certificatio

 E, shall be submitted quarterly to the Department; The annual compliance certification required by Section V.B must contain a certificatio

 E, shall be submitted quarterly to the Department; The annual compliance certification required by Section V.B must contain a certificatio

Page 41
configuration_pollutants1

Section V.B must contain a certification statement for the above applicable requirements;The semiannual monitoring report shall provide 

Section V.B must contain a certification statement for the above applicable requirements;The semiannual monitoring report shall provide 

Section V.B must contain a certification statement for the above applicable requirements;The semiannual monitoring report shall provide 

Section V.B must contain a certification statement for the above applicable requirements;The semiannual monitoring report shall provide 

Section V.B must contain a certification statement for the above applicable requirements;The semiannual monitoring report shall provide 

Section V.B must contain a certification statement for the above applicable requirements;The semiannual monitoring report shall provide 

Page 42
configuration_pollutants1

nual monitoring report shall provide (ARM 17.8.1212):a.A summary of results of any source testing that was performed during that se

nual monitoring report shall provide (ARM 17.8.1212):a.A summary of results of any source testing that was performed during that se

nual monitoring report shall provide (ARM 17.8.1212):a.A summary of results of any source testing that was performed during that se

nual monitoring report shall provide (ARM 17.8.1212):a.A summary of results of any source testing that was performed during that se

nual monitoring report shall provide (ARM 17.8.1212):a.A summary of results of any source testing that was performed during that se

nual monitoring report shall provide (ARM 17.8.1212):a.A summary of results of any source testing that was performed during that se

Page 43
configuration_pollutants1

ng that was performed during that semiannual period;b.Certification that the baghouse was maintained and in place during operation o

ng that was performed during that semiannual period;b.Certification that the baghouse was maintained and in place during operation o

ng that was performed during that semiannual period;b.Certification that the baghouse was maintained and in place during operation o

ng that was performed during that semiannual period;b.Certification that the baghouse was maintained and in place during operation o

ng that was performed during that semiannual period;b.Certification that the baghouse was maintained and in place during operation o

ng that was performed during that semiannual period;b.Certification that the baghouse was maintained and in place during operation o

Page 44
configuration_pollutants1

ained and in place during operation of equipment;c.Certification that the logs required in Sections III.E.24, III.E.25, and III.E.26 were m

ained and in place during operation of equipment;c.Certification that the logs required in Sections III.E.24, III.E.25, and III.E.26 were m

ained and in place during operation of equipment;c.Certification that the logs required in Sections III.E.24, III.E.25, and III.E.26 were m

ained and in place during operation of equipment;c.Certification that the logs required in Sections III.E.24, III.E.25, and III.E.26 were m

ained and in place during operation of equipment;c.Certification that the logs required in Sections III.E.24, III.E.25, and III.E.26 were m

ained and in place during operation of equipment;c.Certification that the logs required in Sections III.E.24, III.E.25, and III.E.26 were m

Page 45
configuration_pollutants1

 III.E.24, III.E.25, and III.E.26 were maintained;d.A summary of compliance with requirements of 40 CFR 60, Subpart Da as applicabl

 III.E.24, III.E.25, and III.E.26 were maintained;d.A summary of compliance with requirements of 40 CFR 60, Subpart Da as applicabl

 III.E.24, III.E.25, and III.E.26 were maintained;d.A summary of compliance with requirements of 40 CFR 60, Subpart Da as applicabl

 III.E.24, III.E.25, and III.E.26 were maintained;d.A summary of compliance with requirements of 40 CFR 60, Subpart Da as applicabl

 III.E.24, III.E.25, and III.E.26 were maintained;d.A summary of compliance with requirements of 40 CFR 60, Subpart Da as applicabl

 III.E.24, III.E.25, and III.E.26 were maintained;d.A summary of compliance with requirements of 40 CFR 60, Subpart Da as applicabl

Page 46
configuration_pollutants1

40 CFR 60, Subpart Da as applicable;e.Certification of compliance with 40 CFR Part 64 (CAM), Appendix F;f.Certification of co

40 CFR 60, Subpart Da as applicable;e.Certification of compliance with 40 CFR Part 64 (CAM), Appendix Ff.Certification of co

40 CFR 60, Subpart Da as applicable;e.Certification of compliance with 40 CFR Part 64 (CAM), Appendix F;f.Certification of co

40 CFR 60, Subpart Da as applicable;e.Certification of compliance with 40 CFR Part 64 (CAM), Appendix F;f.Certification of co

40 CFR 60, Subpart Da as applicable;e.Certification of compliance with 40 CFR Part 64 (CAM), Appendix F;f.Certification of co

40 CFR 60, Subpart Da as applicable;e.Certification of compliance with 40 CFR Part 64 (CAM), Appendix F;f.Certification of co

Page 47
configuration_pollutants1

Appendix F;f.Certification of compliance with 40 CFR Part 64 (CAM), Appendix G; and,g.A summary

Appendix Ff.Certification of compliance with 40 CFR Part 64 (CAM), Appendix G; and,g.A summary

Appendix F;f.Certification of compliance with 40 CFR Part 64 (CAM), Appendix G; and,g.A summary

Appendix F;f.Certification of compliance with 40 CFR Part 64 (CAM), Appendix G; and,g.A summary

Appendix F;f.Certification of compliance with 40 CFR Part 64 (CAM), Appendix G; and,g.A summary

Appendix F;f.Certification of compliance with 40 CFR Part 64 (CAM), Appendix G; and,g.A summary

Page 48
control_technologies

facility_id configuration_id component_idcontrol_id project_titleproject_typevendor_namevndor_contact vendor_phone

10784 Config1 Baghouse 101 Mercury Sorbent Control Non-Demonstration Norit Americas Inc. Rob Nebergall 8006419245

Page 49
control_technologies

vendor_address vndor_cityvendor_statevendor_zip actual_start_date projected_start_date end_date sorbent chemical_additive

3200 West University Marshall Ave.3200 W TX 75671 est University 1/1/2010 Ave. Activated Carbon Calcium bromide

Page 50
control_technologies

injection_point HAP_emission_reduction HAP_emission_rate HAP_emission_rate_units HAP_achieved_reduction HAP_achieved_rate HAP_achieved_rate_units feed_rate feed_rate_units

Upstream of Baghouse0 0.9 lb/TBtu

Page 51
control_technologies

feed_rate_units

Page 52
control_coal_ranks

facility_id configuration_id component_idcontrol_id coal_type

10784 Config1 Baghouse 101 coal refuse

10784 Config1 Baghouse 101 subbituminous

Page 53
control_pollutants1

facility_id configuration_id component_idcontrol_id pollutant_name

10784 Config1 Baghouse 101 Total Mercury (Hgt)

Page 54
control_costs

facility_id configuration_id component_idcontrol_id boiler_retrofit boiler_new_install total_capital_investm total_operating_costs entbase_year

10784 Config1 Baghouse 101 Yes No 972000 1274000 2009

Page 55
control_costs

CBI

FALSE

Page 56
misc_controls

facility_id misc_control_id control_description

Page 57
misc_control_configurations

facility_id misc_control_id configuration_id

Page 58
fuel_shipments

facility_id shipment_idshipment_date amount_received amount_unitsfuel_type state_countryother_countrycounty

10784 1/2009 1/1/2009 23180 short tons (2000 lbs) coal MT MT - Rosebud

10784 10/2009 10/1/2009 21330 short tons (2000 lbs) coal MT MT - Rosebud

10784 11/2009 11/1/2009 4165 short tons (2000 lbs) coal MT MT - Rosebud

10784 12/2009 12/1/2009 23981 short tons (2000 lbs) coal MT MT - Rosebud

10784 2/2009 2/1/2009 17865 short tons (2000 lbs) coal MT MT - Rosebud

10784 3/2009 3/1/2009 20173 short tons (2000 lbs) coal MT MT - Rosebud

10784 4/2009 4/1/2009 20426 short tons (2000 lbs) coal MT MT - Rosebud

10784 5/2009 5/1/2009 23067 short tons (2000 lbs) coal MT MT - Rosebud

10784 6/2009 6/1/2009 22408 short tons (2000 lbs) coal MT MT - Rosebud

10784 7/2009 7/1/2009 22543 short tons (2000 lbs) coal MT MT - Rosebud

10784 8/2009 8/1/2009 23583 short tons (2000 lbs) coal MT MT - Rosebud

10784 9/2009 9/1/2009 19703 short tons (2000 lbs) coal MT MT - Rosebud

Page 59
fuel_shipments

coal_seam shipment_method

MT - Rosebud Trucks

MT - Rosebud Trucks

MT - Rosebud Trucks

MT - Rosebud Trucks

MT - Rosebud Trucks

MT - Rosebud Trucks

MT - Rosebud Trucks

MT - Rosebud Trucks

MT - Rosebud Trucks

MT - Rosebud Trucks

MT - Rosebud Trucks

MT - Rosebud Trucks

Page 60
fuel_shipment_configurations

facility_id shipment_idconfiguration_id

10784 1/2009 Config1

10784 10/2009 Config1

10784 11/2009 Config1

10784 12/2009 Config1

10784 2/2009 Config1

10784 3/2009 Config1

10784 4/2009 Config1

10784 5/2009 Config1

10784 6/2009 Config1

10784 7/2009 Config1

10784 8/2009 Config1

10784 9/2009 Config1

Page 61
fuel_shipment_samples

facility_id shipment_idsample_id amount_fuelamount_fuel_units total_sulfur ash_contentheating_valuehating_units

Page 62
fuel_shipment_samples

chlorine chlorine_unitsfluorine fluorine_unitsdata_provideddata_other_specified supplier_typesupplier_name supplier_address

Page 63
fuel_shipment_samples

supplier_citysupplier_statesupplier_ziplab_name lab_addresslab_city lab_state lab_zip analysis_copies

Page 64
fuel_shipment_samples

analysis_copies

Page 65
fuel_sample_pollutants

facility_id shipment_idsample_id fuel_pollutant pollutant_conc pollutant_conc_units pollutant_conc_ND pollutant_conc_MDL

Page 66
test_reports

facility_id report_id report_typeother_type report_description report_begin_date report_end_date before_control during_deviation

10784 2005 RATAcompliance 2005 Annual RATA and Emissions Testing for SO2, PM and CO 9/19/2005 9/20/2005 No No

10784 2006 RATAcompliance 2006 Annual RATA and Emissions Testing for SO2, PM and CO 8/12/2006 8/13/2006 No No

10784 2007 RATAcompliance 2007 Annual RATA and Emissions Testing for SO2, PM and CO 9/18/2007 9/26/2007 No No

10784 2008 RATAcompliance 2008 Annual RATA and Emissions Testing for SO2, PM and CO 9/30/2008 10/1/2008 No No

10784 2009 RATAcompliance 2009 Annual RATA and Emissions Testing for SO2, PM and CO 9/1/2009 9/2/2009 No No

Page 67
test_reports

deviation_reports

No

No

No

No

No

Page 68
test_report_configurations

facility_id report_id configuration_id

10784 2005 RATAConfig1

10784 2006 RATAConfig1

10784 2007 RATAConfig1

10784 2008 RATAConfig1

10784 2009 RATAConfig1

Page 69
test_report_fuels

facility_id report_id fuel_id

10784 2005 RATA2005 Fuel

10784 2006 RATA2006 Fuel

10784 2007 RATA2007 Fuel

10784 2008 RATA2008 Fuel

10784 2009 RATA2009 Fuel

Page 70
test_report_fuel_types

facility_id report_id fuel_id fuel_type percentage_massvol percentage_btu other_type

10784 2005 RATA2005 Fuel coal - subbituminous19 21

10784 2005 RATA2005 Fuel coal refuse 81 79

10784 2006 RATA2006 Fuel coal - subbituminous9 10

10784 2006 RATA2006 Fuel coal refuse 91 90

10784 2007 RATA2007 Fuel coal - subbituminous7 8

10784 2007 RATA2007 Fuel coal refuse 93 92

10784 2008 RATA2008 Fuel coal - subbituminous10 11

10784 2008 RATA2008 Fuel coal refuse 90 89

10784 2009 RATA2009 Fuel coal - subbituminous9 10

10784 2009 RATA2009 Fuel coal refuse 91 90

Page 71
cem_data

facility_id time_periodcem_period_description

Page 72
cem_data_pollutants1

facility_id time_periodpollutant_name

Page 73
test_report_sampling

facility_id report_id sampling_port_id point_differpoint_description befre_SO2_device point_orientation normal_bypass_percent testing_bypass_percent

10784 2005 RATAsample_ports-1 No No

10784 2006 RATAsample_ports-1 No No

10784 2007 RATAsample_ports-1 No No

10784 2008 RATAsample_ports-1 No No

10784 2009 RATAsample_ports-1 No No

Page 74
test_report_sampling

fg_fraction

Page 75
sampling_runs

facility_id report_id sampling_port_id run_id start_datetime end_datetimunit_load e net_generation fg_moisture_content

10784 2005 RATAsample_ports-1 average 9/19/2005 9/19/2005 40.72 35.12 10

10784 2006 RATAsample_ports-1 average 8/21/2006 8/22/2006 44.1 38.04 10.05

10784 2007 RATAsample_ports-1 average 9/18/2007 9/26/2007 44.7 38.4 9.77

10784 2008 RATAsample_ports-1 average 9/30/2008 10/1/2008 44.43 38.19 9.8

10784 2009 RATAsample_ports-1 average 9/1/2009 9/2/2009 41.05 34.79 10.35

Page 76
sampling_runs

fg_flow_ratefg_flow_rate_units standard_temperature standard_pressure normal_temperature normal_pressure fg_oxygen_content fg_CO2_content fg_temperature

136900 dscfm 68 1 5.4 14.3 1

137750 dscfm 68 1 5.6 14.3 1

133500 dscfm 68 1 6 13 1

139400 dscfm 68 1 5.91 14.5 1

139900 dscfm 68 1 6.1 14.3 1

Page 77
sampling_runs

fg_pressureHg_loi test_methodrun_comments fuel_id fuel_unit_loadfuel_flow_ratefuel_ash fuel_heating_value

0.896 Method 6C, Method 5, Method 10 2005 Fuel 40.72 49650 1.44 7947

0.896 Methods 5, 6C and 10 2006 Fuel 44.1 50666 1.16 8327

0.896 Methods 5, 201a, 6C and 10 2007 Fuel 44.7 47500 1.38 8087

0.896 Methods 5, 6C and 10 2008 Fuel 44.43 45400 1.15 8011

0.896 Methods 5, 6C, 10 and 30B 2009 Fuel 41.05 47100 1.17 8357

Page 78
sampling_runs

fuel_sulfur

1.55

1.07

1.63

1.51

1.27

Page 79
sampling_run_pollutants1

facility_id report_id sampling_port_id run_id pollutant_namconce conc_units conc_ND conc_MDL

10784 2005 RATAsample_ports-1 average Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) FALSE

10784 2005 RATAsample_ports-1 average PM (Filterable) FALSE

10784 2005 RATAsample_ports-1 average Carbon Monoxide (CO) FALSE

10784 2006 RATAsample_ports-1 average PM (Filterable) FALSE

10784 2006 RATAsample_ports-1 average Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) FALSE

10784 2006 RATAsample_ports-1 average Carbon Monoxide (CO) FALSE

10784 2007 RATAsample_ports-1 average PM (Filterable) FALSE

10784 2007 RATAsample_ports-1 average Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) FALSE

10784 2007 RATAsample_ports-1 average Carbon Monoxide (CO) FALSE

10784 2008 RATAsample_ports-1 average PM (Filterable) FALSE

10784 2008 RATAsample_ports-1 average Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) FALSE

10784 2008 RATAsample_ports-1 average Carbon Monoxide (CO) FALSE

10784 2009 RATAsample_ports-1 average PM (Filterable) FALSE

10784 2009 RATAsample_ports-1 average Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) FALSE

10784 2009 RATAsample_ports-1 average Carbon Monoxide (CO) FALSE

10784 2009 RATAsample_ports-1 average Total Mercury (Hgt) FALSE

10784 2008 RATAsample_ports-1 average Total Mercury (Hgt) FALSE

Page 80
sampling_run_pollutants1

emission_rateemission_rate_units emission_rate_ND emission_rate_MDL emission_factor emission_factor_units emission_factor_ND emission_factor_MDL run_pollutant_comment

343.72 pound per hour (lb/hr) FALSE FALSE Stack Temperature = 321 degrees 

1.11 pound per hour (lb/hr) FALSE FALSE Stack Temperature = 321 degrees 

0.18 pound per hour (lb/hr) FALSE FALSE Stack Temperature = 321 degrees 

3.52 pound per hour (lb/hr) FALSE FALSE Stack Temperature = 335 degrees 

339.5 pound per hour (lb/hr) FALSE FALSE Stack Temperature = 335 degrees 

0.76 pound per hour (lb/hr) FALSE FALSE Stack Temperature = 335 degrees 

2.4 pound per hour (lb/hr) FALSE FALSE Stack Temperature = 334 degrees 

283.27 pound per hour (lb/hr) FALSE FALSE Stack Temperature = 334 degrees 

0.59 pound per hour (lb/hr) FALSE FALSE Stack Temperature = 334 degrees 

8.67 pound per hour (lb/hr) FALSE FALSE Stack Temperature = 350 degrees 

306.7 pound per hour (lb/hr) FALSE FALSE Stack Temperature = 350 degrees 

0.9 pound per hour (lb/hr) FALSE FALSE Stack Temperature = 350 degrees 

3.52 pound per hour (lb/hr) FALSE FALSE Stack Temperature = 335 degrees 

262.8 pound per hour (lb/hr) FALSE FALSE Stack Temperature = 335 degrees 

2 pound per hour (lb/hr) FALSE FALSE Stack Temperature = 335 degrees 

FALSE 8.8 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) FALSE Stack Temperature = 335 degrees 

FALSE 36.2 pound per trillion British Thermal Unit (lb/1012Btu) FALSE Stack Temperature = 350 degrees 

Page 81
sampling_run_pollutants1

run_pollutant_comment

Stack Temperature = 321 degrees F

Stack Temperature = 321 degrees F

Stack Temperature = 321 degrees F

Stack Temperature = 335 degrees F

Stack Temperature = 335 degrees F

Stack Temperature = 335 degrees F

Stack Temperature = 334 degrees F - This value is an average between 2 tests: 9/19/07 and 1/27/08 - the test was done twice due to CE

Stack Temperature = 334 degrees F

Stack Temperature = 334 degrees F

Stack Temperature = 350 degrees F

Stack Temperature = 350 degrees F

Stack Temperature = 350 degrees F

Stack Temperature = 335 degrees F

Stack Temperature = 335 degrees F

Stack Temperature = 335 degrees F

Stack Temperature = 335 degrees F

Stack Temperature = 350 degrees F

Page 82
sampling_run_pollutants1

 - the test was done twice due to CEM equipment concerns: the reported value is the mean of the two tests (1.6 lb/hr and 3.2 lb/hr)

Page 83
sampling_run_pollutants1

sts (1.6 lb/hr and 3.2 lb/hr)

Page 84
sampling_run_fuel

facility_id report_id sampling_port_id run_id fuel_pollutant fuel_conc fuel_conc_units fuel_conc_NDfuel_conc_MDL

Page 85
sampling_run_fuel

fuel_conc_MDL

Page 86