alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7477 

To require the Secretary of Defense to complete a data matching agreement 

with the Secretary of Education in order to ensure individuals who 

are current or former active-duty military service members or civilian 

employees and are otherwise eligible for assistance under the public 

service loan forgiveness program have their periods of employment automatically certified and counted towards the public service loan forgiveness 

program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 29, 2024 

Mr. VAN ORDEN (for himself, Mr. DAVIS of North Carolina, Mr. PETERS, and 

Ms. STEFANIK) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Education and the Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by 

the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Defense to complete a data 

matching agreement with the Secretary of Education 

in order to ensure individuals who are current or former 

active-duty military service members or civilian employees 

and are otherwise eligible for assistance under the public 

service loan forgiveness program have their periods of 

employment automatically certified and counted towards 

the public service loan forgiveness program. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 7477 IH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ensuring Military Ac5 cess to Higher Education Benefits Act of 2024’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DATA MATCHING AGREEMENT WITH THE DEPART7 MENT OF EDUCATION. 

8 Not later than one year after the date of enactment 

9 of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall complete a data 

10 matching agreement with the Secretary of Education in 

11 order to ensure that individuals who are current or former 

12 active-duty military service members or civilian employees 

13 and are otherwise eligible for assistance under the public 

14 service loan forgiveness program under section 455(m) of 

15 the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087e(m)) 

16 have their periods of employment, beginning on October 

17 1, 2007, certified. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Douglas W. Domenech Mailing address: P.O. Box 1105, Richmond, Virginia 23218 David K. Paylor

Secretary ofNatural Resources TDD (804)6984021 Director

www:deq.virginia:gov (8) 6984000

1-800-592-5482

lIAR 04ZO11

Ms. Diana Esher, DirectorAir Protection Division (3APOO)

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region ifi

1650 Arch Street

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

Reference: Ambient Air Quality

Standards, Nitrogen Oxides,

Revision AlO

Dear Ms. Esher:

Pursuant to the requirements of § 110 ofthe Clean Air Act, we are officially requesting

approval of a revision to the Commonwealth ofVirginia State Implementation Plan approvedand submitted under the authority of* 10.1-1185 ofthe Code ofVirginia and in accordance with

the requirements of 40 CFR Part 51 (Requirements for Preparation, Adoption, and Submittal of

Implementation Plans).

This revision consists of a regulation (9VAC5 Chapter 30) that contains the ambient air

quality standards set out in 40 CFR Part 50. This action added a new primary 1-hour standard for

nitrogen oxides (NOx) measured as nitrogen dioxide (NO 2)at 100 ppb. In addition, the List of

appendices to 40 CFR Part 51 was updated under documents incorporated by reference, 9VAC5-

20-21. The regulation amendments were adopted by the State Air Pollution Control Board onJune 4, 2010 under the authority of § 10.1-1308 ofthe Code of Virginia.

Enclosed are the following:

1. A true copy ofthe official regulation (Revision AlO) which was published in the

Virginia Register on July 19, 2010 after being duly adopted by the State AirPollution Control Board on June 4, 2010, certified by the Office ofthe Attorney

General as within the board’s statutory authority on June 17, 2010, and thus fully
administrative procedures.

3. Public participation record.

Ifyou have any questions or need additional information, please let us know;

Sin ly, /David K. Paylor

DKPkgsTEMPLATES\SIP-REO\RBGOO

SIPNONATTN AREAS\201 1\A1O-SIP.DOC

Enclosures
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 1996 and the Consolidated
Statement of Income for the year ended December 31, 1996 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           526,799
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          138,584
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            147,813
<EQUITIES>                                       2,946
<MORTGAGE>                                      70,156
<REAL-ESTATE>                                    6,620
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               1,094,274
<CASH>                                           2,079
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              61,697
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          77,968
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,301,742
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                157,395
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             10,679
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 460,097
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                           13,662
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            99
<OTHER-SE>                                     208,573
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,301,742
<PREMIUMS>                                     181,690
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             54,371
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 167
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  15,771
<BENEFITS>                                     106,946
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     47,554
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            51,365
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,646
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,926
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,720
<DISCONTINUED>                                     295
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,015
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.51
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT ADAM JONES, individua lly a s a n a ggrie ve d e m

ploy e e and on be ha lf of othe r a ggrie ve d e m

ploy e e s, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. B ATH & B ODY W ORKS, LLC , De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 14-56778

D.C . No. 2:13-c v-05206-FM OAJW M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the C e ntra l Distric t of C a lifornia Fe rnando M . Olguin, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Argue d a nd Subm itte d De c e m

be r 8, 2014 * Pa sa de n a , C a l ifornia B e fore : GR

AB ER , GOULD, a

nd C ALLAHAN, C irc uit Judge s. This is a n a ppe a l, file d pursua

nt to 28 U.S.C . § 1453(c ), of the distric t c ourt’ s orde r re m anding theunde rly ing puta tive c la ss a c t ion to sta

te c ourt. R e vie wing the distric t c ourt’ s re m and orde r denov o , Abre go Abre go v . Dow

C he m. 

# FIL ED D EC 29 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S
. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by Ninth C irc uit R

ule 36-3.C

o. , 443 F.3d 676, 679 (9th C ir. 2006) (pe r c uriam ), we re ve rse the distric t c ourt’ s re m and orde r and c o nc lude tha t the distric t

c o urt ha s jurisdic tion pursua nt to the C la ss Ac t ion Fa i rne ss Ac t of 2005 (“ C AFA” ), 28 U.S.C . § 1332(d). The sole dispute on a

p pe a l wa s whe the r de fe nda nt ha s m e t its burde n of proof unde r C AFA to e sta blish tha t the am ount in c ontrove rsy e xc e e ds $5 m illion, but this dispute

no longe r e x i ste d whe n we he ard ora l a rgum e nts of the pa

rtie s. At ora l argum e nt, pla intiff c onc e de d tha t the e v ide nc e subm i tte d by de fe nda nt, if c re d ite d, is suffic ie nt to show by a pre ponde ranc e of the e vide nc e tha t the am ount in c o ntrove rsy

e xc e e ds $5 m illion. Plaintiff a lso c onc e de d in its a nswe ring brie f that “ the distric t c ourt m a

y not ha ve fully c onside re d the sa

m ple data subm itte d by [de fe nda nt] . If the e stim ate d am ounts from the sa m ple data we re e xtra

pola te d to c ove r a ll e ligibleputa

tive c l a ss m e m

be rs, the n the figure s provide d for the wa iting tim e pe na ltie s a lone would like ly e c lipse the $5 m illion thre s hold.” Partie s c annot c o n se nt to subje c t m atte r jurisdic tion, a nd a la c k of subje c t m atte r jurisdic tion is a

non-c onse nta

ble de fe c t . Se eOw e n Equip. & Ere c tion C

o. v . K roge r , 437 U.S. 365, 377 n.21 (1978). He re , howe v e r, we a gre e with thepa rtie s that de fe n da nt ha s subm itte d suffic i e nt e vide nc e to show by a pre ponde ranc e of the e vide nc e tha

t the am ount in c ontrove rsy e xc e e ds $5 m illion. W e c onc lude tha t the distric t c o urt ha s jurisdic tion ove r the unde rly ing puta tive c l a ss a c tion unde r 2C AFA.

RE V E RSE D and RE M ANDE D.

3
Exhibit 31.2
Certification
I, Charles R. Bearchell, certify that
 1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Youbet.com, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisquarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) [omitted in accordance with Section III.E.of SEC Release No. 34-47986] for the registrant and we have:
 a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report is being prepared;b. [Omitted in accordance with Section III.E. of SEC Release No.34-47986.]  b. [Omitted in accordance with Section III.E. of SEC Release No.34-47986.]  c. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  d. disclosed, if applicable, in this quarterly report any change inthe registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the quartercovered by the report that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal controls over financial reporting.        November 15, 2004 By:  /s/ Charles R. Bearchell    Charles R. Bearchell    Chief Financial Officer
§ 200.343 Effects of suspension and termination. Costs to the non-Federal entity resulting from financial obligations incurred by the non-Federal entity during a suspension or after termination of a Federal award or subaward are not allowable unless the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes them in the notice of suspension or termination or subsequently. However, costs during suspension or after termination are allowable if: ( a ) The costs result from financial obligations which were properly incurred by the non-Federal entity before the effective date of suspension or termination, are not in anticipation of it; and
( b ) The costs would be allowable if the Federal award was not suspended or expired normally at the end of the period of performance in which the termination takes effect.
§ 573.140 Ammoniated cottonseed meal. The food additive ammoniated cottonseed meal may be safely used in accordance with the following conditions: ( a ) The food additive is the product obtained by the treatment of cottonseed meal with anhydrous ammonia until a pressure of 50 pounds per square inch gauge is reached.
( b ) It is used or intended for use in the feed of ruminants as a source of protein and/or as a source of nonprotein nitrogen in an amount not to exceed 20 percent of the total ration.
( c ) To assure safe use, the label and labeling of the additive and of any feed additive supplement, concentrate, or premix prepared therefrom shall bear, in addition to the other information required by the act, the following: ( 1 ) The name of the additive.
( 2 ) The maximum percentage of equivalent crude protein from the nonprotein nitrogen.
( 3 ) Directions for use to provide not more than 20 percent of the additive in the total ration.
( 4 ) A statement: ( i ) That not more than one-third of the total protein in the feed should come from nonprotein nitrogen sources.
( ii ) That the additive is not to be given to debilitated or starved animals.
( iii ) “Warning—This feed should be used only in accordance with directions furnished on the label.”
[41 FR 38652, Sept. 10, 1976, as amended at 42 FR 52397, Sept. 30, 1977]
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARIA TRINDAD RODRIGUEZ

FREGOSO,

Petitioner,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney

General,

Respondent. No. 15

- 72895

Agency No. A201

- 289

- 483

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 17, 2022 * *

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Maria Trin i dad Rodriguez

- Fregoso , a native and citizen of Mexico , petitions

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her

motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAY 20 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 15

- 72895

Oyeniran v. Holder

, 672 F.3d 800, 806 (9th Cir. 2012) . We deny th e petition for

review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Rodriguez

- Fregoso’s motion

to reopen where she failed to demonstrate that the evidence she sought to offer was

not available and c ould not have been discovered or presented at the former

hearing. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)( 1 ) ; Guzman v. I.N.S. , 318 F.3d 911, 913 (9th

Cir. 2003) (no abuse of discretion where evidence was previously available and

capable of discovery prior to former hearing).

The temporary stay of removal remains in place until issuance of the

mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Exhibit 32.1

FIRST MARINER BANCORP  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to, and for purposes only of, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, I, Edwin F. Hale, Sr., Chief Executive Officer of First
Mariner Bancorp (the "Company") hereby certify that (i) the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 31, 2011

/s/ EDWIN F. HALE, SR. Edwin F. Hale, Sr. Chief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE ANNUAL
REPORT  ON FORM 10-K AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH
FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          541
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                        7,809
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                  0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                  0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   4,009
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                        7,231
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                          7,151
<LOANS>                                      89,432
<ALLOWANCE>                                     370
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              110,416
<DEPOSITS>                                   82,018
<SHORT-TERM>                                      0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                           2,178
<LONG-TERM>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                        218
<OTHER-SE>                                   26,002
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              110,416
<INTEREST-LOAN>                               6,757
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               552
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                436
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                              7,745
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                            3,813
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            3,813
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                         3,932
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    35
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                               1,728
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               2,285
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                    2,285
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                  1,508
<EPS-BASIC>                                   .94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   .94
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 3.63
<LOANS-NON>                                       0
<LOANS-PAST>                                    281
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                  0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                335
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     0
<RECOVERIES>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               370
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            370
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                               0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                           0



</TABLE>
Exhibit 4.2

Schedule 1 to Exhibit 4.1  Individual Deviations from Standard Management Board Services  Agreement by Current Members of Management Board(1)

|Name                     |  | For reporting period |  | Term; §1(i)              |  | Appointed by
Resolution of
Supervisory Board
dated; §1(i) |  | Fixed Annual
Salary; §4(i)(a) |  | Bonus;
§4(i)(b) |  | Additional
bonus;
§4(i)(b) 2d.
par. |   | Position;
§1(i)
|------------------------ |  | -------------------- |  | ------------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------- |  | --------------- |  | ----------------------------------- | - | ---------------
|Kai-Uwe Ricke            |  | 1.1. to 31.12.2004   |  | 15.11.2002 to 14.11.2007 |  | Nov. 14, 2002                                             |  | 1,250,000                     |  | 1,250,000       |  | 20                                  | % | Chairman       
|Dr. Karl-Gerhard Eick    |  | 1.1. to 31.12.2004   |  | 1.12.2002 to 30.11.2007  |  | Nov. 28, 2002                                             |  | 937,500                       |  | 937,500         |  | 20                                  | % | Vice-Chairman  
|Dr. Heinz Klinkhammer(2) |  | 1.1. to 31.12.2004   |  | 1.4.2001 to 31.3.2006    |  | Apr. 13, 2000                                             |  | 750,000                       |  | 750,000         |  | 20                                  | % | Member         
|Rene Oberman             |  | 1.1. to 31.12.2004   |  | 1.12.2002 to 30.11.2007  |  | Nov. 28, 2002                                             |  | 750,000                       |  | 750,000         |  | 20                                  | % | Member         
|Konrad F. Reiss          |  | 1.1. to 31.12.2004   |  | 20.1.2003 to 19.1.2008   |  | Jan. 16, 2003                                             |  | 750,000                       |  | 750,000         |  | 20                                  | % | Member         
|Walter Raizner(3)        |  | 1.1. to 31.12.2004   |  | 1.11.2004 to 31.10.2009  |  | Sept. 3, 2004                                             |  | 937,500                       |  | 937,500         |  | 20                                  | % | Member         

---

---



QuickLinks