alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit31.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPALEXECUTIVE OFFICER**

I, Thomas J. Shaw,certify that:

1. I have reviewedthis annual report on Form 10-K of Retractable Technologies, Inc.;

2. Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’sother certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

a)              Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)             Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport, based on such evaluation;

c)              Disclosed in thisreport any changes in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal controls over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and reportfinancial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date:  April 2, 2007 |   |                     |
|---------------------------|--------|--------------------------|
|                      |   | /s/ Thomas J. Shaw       |
|                      |   | THOMAS J. SHAW           |
|                      |   | PRESIDENT, CHAIRMAN, AND |
|                      |   | CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  |

 

----
§ 520.1452 Moxidectin gel. ( a ) *Specifications.* Each milliliter of gel contains 20 milligrams (2 percent) moxidectin.
( b ) *Sponsor.* See No. 054771 in § 510.600(c) of this chapter.
( c ) *Special considerations.* See § 500.25 of this chapter.
( d ) *Conditions of use in horses and ponies* — ( 1 ) *Amount.* 0.4 milligram moxidectin per kilogram (2.2 pounds) of body weight.
( 2 ) *Indications for use.* For the treatment and control of large strongyles: *Strongylus vulgaris* (adults and L4/L5 arterial stages), *S.* *edentatus* (adult and tissue stages), *Triodontophorus brevicauda* (adults), and *T.* *serratus* (adults); small strongyles (adults): *Cyathostomum* spp., including *C. catinatum* and *C. pateratum*; *Cylicocyclus.* spp., including *C. insigne, C. leptostomum, C. nassatus*, and *C. radiatus; Cyliocostephanus* spp., including *C. calicatus, C. goldi, C. longibursatus,* and *C. minutus*; *Coronocyclus* spp., including *C. coronatus, C. labiatus,* and *C. labratus*; *Gyalocephalus capitatus*; and *Petrovinema poculatus*; small strongyles: undifferentiated lumenal larvae; encysted cyathostomes (late L3 and L4 mucosal cyathostome larvae); ascarids: *Parascaris equorum* (adults and L4 larval stages); pinworms: *Oxyuris equi* (adults and L4 larval stages); hairworms: *Trichostrongylus axei* (adults); large-mouth stomach worms: *Habronema muscae* (adults); and horse stomach bots: *Gasterophilus intestinalis* (2nd and 3rd instars) and *G.* *nasalis* (3rd instars). One dose also suppresses strongyle egg production for 84 days.
( 3 ) *Limitations.* Do not use in horses intended for human consumption.
[62 FR 42902, Aug. 11, 1997, as amended at 64 FR 66105, Nov. 24, 1999; 68 FR 51445, Aug. 27, 2003; 69 FR 24959, May 5, 2004; 70 FR 75017, Dec. 19, 2005; 78 FR 28825, May 20, 2014]
§ 573.800 Polyethylene glycol (400) mono- and dioleate. ( a ) The food additive polyethylene glycol (400) mono- and dioleate meets the following specifications: Saponification number, 80-88; acid number, 5.0 maximum; and average molecular weight range, 640-680.
( b ) It is used as a processing aid in the production of animal feeds when present as a result of its addition to molasses in an amount not to exceed 250 parts per million of the molasses.
§ 582.1165 Butane. ( a ) *Product.* Butane.
( b ) *Conditions of use.* This substance is generally recognized as safe when used in accordance with good manufacturing or feeding practice.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 02268**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket** **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 

### 02268\02268_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 02268\02268_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 02268\02268_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 

### 02268\02268_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02268\02268_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02268\02268_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02268\02268_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02268\02268_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 02268\Certification Statement Plant ID 02268.pdf Plant certification statement x 

### 02268\Supplemental Documents\02268_Part A_CBI_A10.5_A1_Conemaugh.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 02268\Supplemental Documents\02268_Part A_CBI_A10.5_A2_Conemaugh.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 02268\Supplemental Documents\02268_Part A_CBI_A10.5_A3_Conemaugh.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 02268\Supplemental Documents\02268_Part A_CBI_A10.5_A4_Conemaugh.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 02268\Supplemental Documents\02268_Part A_CBI_A10.5_A5_Conemaugh.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 02268\Supplemental Documents\02268_Part A_CBI_C3.29_Conemaugh.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey



### 02268\Supplemental Documents\02268_Part A_MAP-1_Conemaugh.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### 02268\Supplemental Documents\02268_Part A_MAP-2_Conemaugh.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 02268\Supplemental Documents\02268_Part A_MAP-3_Conemaugh.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 02268\Supplemental Documents\02268_Part A_WB-1_Conemaugh.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 02268\Supplemental Documents\02268_Part D_CBI_ABMet_Pilot_Conemaugh.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 02268\Supplemental Documents\02268_Part D_CBI_FGD_IX_Boron_Report_Conemaugh.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 02268\Supplemental Documents\02268_Part D_CBI_Metallic_Iron_12-15-08_Conemaugh.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### x 02268\Supplemental Documents\02268_Part D_D5-10_FGD_ZLD_Study_Conemaugh.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 02268\Supplemental Documents\02268_Part D_Diagram_D.1_Conemaugh.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 02268\Supplemental Documents\02268_Part D_Diagram_D.2_Conemaugh.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 02268\Supplemental Documents\02268_Part D_Diagram_D.3_Conemaugh.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

2Copyright documents are available from the docket. 1Final reviewed survey responses are located in theSteam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

.
# C_2015146EN.01004501.xml

| 4.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 146/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 146/45

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 18 March 2015 — DK v EEAS

(Case F-27/14) (1)

1

((Civil service - EEAS staff - Official - Discipliary proceedings - Removal from post without reduction of entitlement to a pension - Article 25 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations - Pending criminal proceedings - The facts before the appointing authority and the court hearing the criminal proceedings the same))

(2015/C 146/60)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: DK (represented by: S. Orlandi, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European External Action Service (EEAS) (represented by: S. Marquardt and M. Silva, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision by which the applicant was removed from his post without reduction of his entitlement to a pension, with effect from 1 February 2014, following disciplinary proceedings taken after the indictment of the applicant by the national authorities for European public procurement fraud, forgery and use of forgery, money laundering and corruption.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of 16 January 2014 by which the European External Action Service removed DK from his post without reduction of his entitlement to a pension; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of 16 January 2014 by which the European External Action Service removed DK from his post without reduction of his entitlement to a pension;

| 2. | Orders the European External Action Service to bear its own costs and to pay all the costs incurred by DK. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European External Action Service to bear its own costs and to pay all the costs incurred by DK.

---

(1)  OJ C 184, 16.6.2014, p. 43.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         702,261
<SECURITIES>                                    19,472
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,616,279
<ALLOWANCES>                                    22,934
<INVENTORY>                                  2,988,166
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,485,274
<PP&E>                                       9,793,378
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,233,465
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,192,875
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,694,607
<BONDS>                                        741,160
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,457,281
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,294,401
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,192,875
<SALES>                                      7,353,290
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,406,314
<CGS>                                        6,212,139
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  565,440
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,086
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,427
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                611,207
<INCOME-TAX>                                   243,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            368,207
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   368,207
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13
        

</TABLE>
§ 357.810 Active ingredients for deodorant drug products for internal use. The active ingredient of the product consists of either of the following when used within the dosage limits established for each ingredient in § 357.850(d): ( a ) Bismuth subgallate.
( b ) Chlorophyllin copper complex.
Exhibit 10.9


 


 


Ref: ASR2017/12425


 


05 April 2017


 


Private & Confidential


Steven Holmes


19 St. Peter's Street


Stamford


Lincolnshire


PE9 2PQ


 


 


 


Dear Steven


 


I am pleased to confirm that with effect from 1st April
2017, your salary will be increased to £162,400.00 per annum.


 


This increase will be reflected in your next salary payment,
which will be paid into your bank account on the 28th April 2017.


 


I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your
continued contribution to the company.


 


Yours sincerely


 


Luke Alvarez


 


   


 pp


Luke Alvarez


President and CEO


 


Inspired Gaming (UK) Limited, Registered
in England Number: 03565640


Registered Office: 3, The Maltings, Wetmore Road, Burton-On-Trent


Staffordshire


DE14 1SE


Inspired Gaming (UK) Limited is part of Inspired Gaming Group
Limited
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS**

          We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registrations Statements (Form S-3 Nos. 333-39618 and 333-62685) of SportsLine.com, Inc. and inthe related Prospectus, and in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-43746, 333-46021, 333-46023, 333-46029, 333-57821, 333-33650 and 333-33654) pertaining to the SportsLine.com, Inc. 1997 Incentive Compensation Plan, 1997 Employee StockPurchase Plan and 1995 Stock Option Plan and certain other options and warrants,of our report dated January 27, 2003 (except for Note 13, as to which the date is March 24, 2003), with respect to the consolidated financial statements ofSportsLine.com, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.

|                    | /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP |
|-------------------------|---------------------------|
|                    |                           |
| Ft. Lauderdale, Florida |                      |
| March 25, 2003          |                      |
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23

- 1987

In re: JONATHAN PENDLETON , Petitioner

.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria . ( 1:23

- cv - 00446

- LMB

- IDD )

Submitted : October 19, 2023 Decided: October 23, 2023

Before KING and WYNN , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

Jonathan Pendleton, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-1987 Doc: 8 Filed: 10/23/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:
Jonathan Pendleton petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed ruling on the motions pending in his 42 U .S.C. § 1983 action. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s
docket reveals that the district court dismissed Pendleton’s § 1983 action and denied all pending motions. Accordingly, becaus e the district court has recently decided Pendleton ’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not ai d the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED USCA4 Appeal: 23-1987 Doc: 8 Filed: 10/23/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
§ 660.54 Potency tests, specificity tests, tests for heterospecific antibodies, and additional tests for nonspecific properties. The following tests shall be performed using test procedures approved by the Director, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research: ( a ) Potency tests for determining anti-IgG and anti-complement activity.
( b ) Specificity tests, tests for heterospecific antibodies, and additional tests for nonspecific properties.
[50 FR 5579, Feb. 11, 1985, as amended at 50 FR 16474, Apr. 26, 1985; 51 FR 15611, Apr. 25, 1986; 55 FR 11014, Mar. 26, 1990; 67 FR 9587, Mar. 4, 2002; 70 FR 14986, Mar. 24, 2005]
#### Eastern Consolidators, Inc. *v.*W. L. McAviney Properties, Inc.

*Robert K. Walsh,*for the appellee (defendant).

*W. Paul Flynn,*for the appellant (plaintiff).

Argued December 2

decided December *2,*1969

The motion by the defendant to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in New Haven County is denied.
#### Connecticut Television, Inc. *v.*Public Utilities Commission et al. New Haven TV Cable Company, Inc. *v.*Public Utilities Commission et al. Ducci Electric Company, Inc. *v.*Public Utilities Commission et al. The Outlet/B-T Company *v.*Public Utilities Commission et al.

*Joseph P. Cooney,*for the appellee (defendant TelePrompTer, Inc.) in each case.

Such parties as wish to do so may unite in a joint brief for the above-entitled appeals, and each party may also file a short supplemental brief covering such matters as are not included in a joint brief.

Such parties as wish to do so may unite in a joint appendix for the above-entitled appeals, and each party may also file a supplemental appendix covering such material as is not included in a joint appendix.

*658
      *Marcia B. Smith,*for the appellant (plaintiff) in the third case.

*John L. Collins,*for the appellee (defendant Community Television Systems Inc. in the first and second cases).

*Herbert L. Emanuelson, Jr.,*for the appellant (plaintiff) in the second case.

*Bourke G. Spellacy,*for the appellant (plaintiff) in the f ourth case.

Argued November 4

decided November 25, 1969
EXHIBIT 32.2







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of Southwall Technologies Inc.(the "Company"), for the quarter
ended September 28, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael E. Seifert, the Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.







| | November 19, 2003 | By: | /s/ Michael E. Seifert                      
| | ----------------- | --- | --------------------------------------------
| |                   |     | Michael E. Seifert
  Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

In accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K, this certification is being
"furnished" as Exhibit 32.2 to the Company's quarterly report and
shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") or otherwise
subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated
by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act,
except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing.

---
# C_2014372EN.01001201.xml

| 20.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 372/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 372/12

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 19 August 2014 — Vodafone GmbH v Federal Republic of Germany

(Case C-395/14)

2014/C 372/15

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesverwaltungsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Vodafone GmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Federal Republic of Germany

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Is Article 7(3) of Directive 2002/21/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive) to be interpreted as meaning that a national regulatory authority which has required an operator with significant market power to provide mobile call termination services and has made the fees charged for this subject to authorisation in compliance with the procedure laid down in the aforementioned provision of the directive is required to carry out the procedure under Article 7(3) of Directive 2002/21/EC again before each authorisation of fees specifically requested?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2002 L 108, p. 33.

1

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1




                       Consent of Independent Accountants




The Board of Directors
WebTrends Corporation:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form
S-8 of WebTrends Corporation of our report dated January 11, 1999, except for
note 10, which is as of January 19, 1999 relating to the balance sheets of
WebTrends Corporation as of December 31, 1997 and 1998, and the related 
statements of operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1998, which report appeared
on Form S-1 of WebTrends Corporation (No. 333-69171), and to the reference to
our firm under the heading "Experts" in the Prospectus.


                                   /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP



Portland, Oregon
April 21, 1999
<PAGE>


                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

            CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration 
Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-98720) pertaining to the 1995 Stock Option Plan of 
Mackie Designs Inc. of our report dated February 26, 1999 with respect to the 
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Mackie Designs Inc. 
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 
1998.

                                                Ernst & Young LLP

Seattle, Washington
March 29, 1999