alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 14, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-10425

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

WESLEY JAMES WILSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:92-CR-141-Y-6

--------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and SMITH, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Wesley James Wilson, federal prisoner # 23795-077, appeals

the district court’s denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion

for resentencing in view of United States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct.

738 (2005), and his motion for reconsideration. He argues that

the district court abused its discretion because he was entitled

to resentencing under Amendment 505 to the United States

Sentencing Guidelines and under Booker.
No. 05-10425

-2-

“Section 3582(c)(2) [of Title 18] permits a district court

to reduce a term of imprisonment when it is based upon a

sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by an

amendment to the Guidelines, if such a reduction is consistent

with the policy statements issued by the Sentencing Commission.” 

United States v. Gonzalez-Balderas, 105 F.3d 981, 982 (5th Cir.

1997). Wilson’s Booker argument is not cognizable in the context

of an 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion because it is not based on a

retroactive amendment to the Guidelines. See United States v.

Shaw, 30 F.3d 26, 29 (5th Cir. 1994). The district court also

correctly noted that Wilson had previously filed a motion for

resentencing under Amendment 505, which the district court had

denied. Wilson has not shown that the district court abused its

discretion in denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion and his

motion for reconsideration. Gonzalez-Balderas, 105 F.3d at 982.

AFFIRMED.
§ 520.1628 Oxfendazole powder and pellets. ( a ) *Specifications* — ( 1 ) *Powder for suspension.* Each gram of powder contains 7.57 percent oxfendazole.
( 2 ) *Pellets.* Each gram of pellets contains 6.49 percent oxfendazole.
( b ) *Sponsor.* See No. 054771 in § 510.600(c) of this chapter.
( c ) *Conditions of use* — ( 1 ) *Amount.* 10 milligrams per kilogram of body weight.
( 2 ) *Indications for use.* The drug is used in horses for removal of the following gastrointestinal worms: Large roundworms (*Parascaris equorum*), mature and immature pinworms (*Oxyuris equi*), large strongyles (*Strongylus edentatus, Strongylus vulgaris,* and *Strongylus equinus*), and small strongyles.
( 3 ) *Limitations* — ( i ) *Powder for suspension.* For gravity administration via stomach tube or for positive administration via stomach tube and dose syringe. Discard unused portions of suspension after 24 hours. Mix drug according to directions prior to use. Administer drug with caution to sick or debilitated horses. Not for use in horses intended for food. Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian.
( ii ) *Pellets.* The drug is given by sprinkling on the grain portion of the ration. Withholding feed or water prior to administration is not necessary. Administer drug with caution to sick or debilitated horses. Not for use in horses intended for food. Consult your veterinarian for assistance in the diagnosis, treatment, and control of parasitism.
[44 FR 35211, June 19, 1979, as amended at 46 FR 26301, May 12, 1981; 46 FR 60570, Dec. 11, 1981; 49 FR 28549, July 13, 1984; 61 FR 5506, Feb. 13, 1996; 78 FR 28825, May 20, 2014]
- fplr2259-1
- fplr2259-2
- fplr2259-3
- fplr2259-4
- fplr2259-5
- fplr2259-6
- fplr2259-7
- fplr2259-8
- fplr2259-9
- fplr2259-10
- fplr2259-11
- fplr2259-12
- fplr2259-13
- fplr2259-14
- fplr2259-15
- fplr2259-16
- fplr2259-17
- fplr2259-18
- fplr2259-19
- fplr2259-20
- fplr2259-21
§ 579.40 Ionizing radiation for the treatment of poultry feed and poultry feed ingredients. Ionizing radiation for the treatment of complete poultry diets and poultry feed ingredients may be safely used as follows: ( a ) *Energy sources.* Ionizing radiation is limited to: ( 1 ) Gamma rays from sealed units of cobalt-60 or cesium-137;
( 2 ) Electrons generated from machine sources at energy levels not to exceed 10 million electron volts (MeV);
( 3 ) X-rays generated from machine sources at energies not to exceed 5 MeV, except as permitted by § 179.26(a)(4) of this chapter; or
( 4 ) X-rays generated from machine sources using tantalum or gold as the target material and using energies not to exceed 7.5 MeV.
( b ) *Limitation.* The ionizing radiation is used for feed or feed ingredients that do not contain drugs.
( c ) *Use.* Ionizing radiation is used as a single treatment for rendering complete poultry diets or poultry feed ingredients salmonella negative as follows: ( 1 ) Minimum dose 2.0 kiloGrays (kGy) (0.2 megarad (Mrad)); maximum dose 25 kGy (2.5 megarads Mrad). The absorbed dose of irradiation is to be based on initial concentration of salmonella using the relationship that 1.0 kGy (0.1 Mrad) reduces salmonella concentration by one log cycle (one decimal reduction).
( 2 ) Feeds treated by irradiation should be formulated to account for nutritional loss.
( 3 ) If an irradiated feed ingredient is less than 5 percent of the final product, the final product can be irradiated without being considered to be reirradiated.
[60 FR 50099, Sept. 28, 1995, as amended at 78 FR 27304, May 10, 2013; 78 FR 34565, June 10, 2013]
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7442 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7442

  To direct the Comptroller General of the United States to conduct a 
  study to assess the feasibility and financial effects of expanding 
coverage under the Medicare program to items and services furnished in 
                            the Philippines.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 23, 2024

Mr. Moylan (for himself and Mr. Sablan) introduced the following bill; 
which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition 
      to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Comptroller General of the United States to conduct a 
  study to assess the feasibility and financial effects of expanding 
coverage under the Medicare program to items and services furnished in 
                            the Philippines.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Philippine Medicare Portability 
Study Act''.

SEC. 2. GAO STUDY AND REPORT.

    Not later than the date that is 180 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States 
shall submit to Congress a report on the feasibility and financial 
effects of expanding coverage under the Medicare program under title 
XVIII of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395 et seq.) to include 
items and services furnished in the Philippines to individuals entitled 
to benefits under part A of such title and enrolled under part B or 
part C of such title. Such report shall include information on the 
following:
            (1) The estimated cost savings to the Medicare program that 
        would be realized during the period beginning January 1, 2025, 
        and ending December 31, 2034, through payment for such items 
        and services pursuant to such expansion of coverage, as 
        compared to the likely costs of payment for such items and 
        services within the United States during such period.
            (2) A description of the legislative and administrative 
        changes to the Medicare program that would be required in order 
        for such expansion of coverage to be implemented.
                                 <all>
```
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7469 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

28 East Airy Street in Norristown, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Charles L. 

Blockson Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 28, 2024 

Ms. DEAN of Pennsylvania (for herself, Mr. FITZPATRICK, Mr. KELLY of 

Pennsylvania, Mr. EVANS, and Ms. SCANLON) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 28 East Airy Street in Norristown, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Charles L. Blockson Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CHARLES L. BLOCKSON POST OFFICE BUILD4 ING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 28 East Airy Street in NorrisVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:00 Mar 01, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H7469.IH H7469

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 7469 IH

1 town, Pennsylvania, shall be known and designated as the 

2 ‘‘Charles L. Blockson Post Office Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Charles L. Blockson 

7 Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7607 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.7607

                     One Hundred Eighteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
         the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-four

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
Block 1025, Lots 18 & 19, Northeast Corner of US Route 9 South and Main 
Street in the Township of Middle, County of Cape May, New Jersey, as the 
              ``George Henry White Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. GEORGE HENRY WHITE POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at Block 1025, Lots 18 & 19, Northeast Corner of US Route 9 
South and Main Street in the Township of Middle, County of Cape May, 
New Jersey, shall be known and designated as the ``George Henry White 
Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``George 
Henry White Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                          15,726
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,745
<PP&E>                                       3,591,500
<DEPRECIATION>                               (386,246)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,257,117
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          450,790
<BONDS>                                      1,633,213
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,183,008
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,257,117
<SALES>                                        168,380
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               174,986
<CGS>                                          179,893
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  179,893
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             113,922
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (118,830)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (118,830)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (57.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (57.08)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2014235EN.01000901.xml

| 21.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/9

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) (United Kingdom) made on 12 May 2014 — Portmeirion Group UK Ltd v The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs

(Case C-232/14)

2014/C 235/12

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Referring court

First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber)

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Portmeirion Group UK Ltd

Applicant:

Defendant: The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

Is the contested Regulation (Council Regulation No 412/2013 (1)) incompatible with EU law in so far as it

1

| i. | is based on manifest errors of assessment with respect to the definition of the product concerned, thereby invalidating the conclusions of the anti-dumping investigation; and |
| --- | --- |

i.

is based on manifest errors of assessment with respect to the definition of the product concerned, thereby invalidating the conclusions of the anti-dumping investigation; and

| ii. | lacks adequate reasons as required under Article 296 TFEU? |
| --- | --- |

ii.

lacks adequate reasons as required under Article 296 TFEU?

---

(1)  Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 412/2013 of 13 May 2013 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of ceramic tableware and kitchenware originating in the People's Republic of China

1

OJ L 131, p. 1

---
<PAGE>   1

                                  EXHIBIT 23.2


                     CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting part of this Registration Statement on Form S-3 of our report
dated January 21, 1999 appearing on page F-2 of Data Dimension's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998. We also consent to
the incorporation by reference of our report dated July 13, 1998 relating to
the financial statements of ST Labs, Inc. which appears in the Current Report
on Form 8-K of Data Dimensions, Inc. dated August 7, 1998. We also consent to
the reference to us under the heading "EXPERTS" in such Prospectus.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
-------------------------------------
Seattle, Washington
March 9, 1999



                                     III-4
§ 582.5212 Calcium pantothenate. ( a ) *Product.* Calcium pantothenate.
( b ) *Conditions of use.* This substance is generally recognized as safe when used in accordance with good manufacturing or feeding practice.
Order filed, April 3, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-00093-CV

____________

REBECCA ANN BURGIN, Appellant

V.

JAMES BRENT BURGIN, Appellee

On Appeal from the 434th Judicial District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 06-DCV-152401

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due March 25, 2013. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the 

record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record 

has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Karen Woolsey, the official court reporter, to file the record in 

this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
#### JOHN A. JOHNSON *against*ABRAM JOHNSON.

OH CEBTIOBABI.

State of demand insensible. No judgment, proceedings null.

The reason relied on for the reversal of the judgment of the justice, is as follows, to wit: Because the state of the demand filed by the plaintiff before the justice, [102] is insensible, and contains no cause of action. The state of demand is as follows:



May 17, 1806.

[f] There was a jury trial and verdict for the plaintiff below, for twenty dollars; but no judgment rendered. The court were of opinion, that the state of demand was too uncertain, to render a judgment on; and, therefore, set aside and made null and void the proceedings.

*Maxwell,*for plaintiff.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Housing and Urban Development

          - [Docket No. FR-5375-N-07]

# AGENCY:

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, HUD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible use to assist the homeless.

# DATES:

*Effective Date: February 26, 2010.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street SW., Room 7262, Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-free), or                               ( print page 8986)                            call the toll-free Title V information line at 800-927-7588.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with the December 12, 1988 court order in                     *National Coalition for the Homeless*                     v.                     *Veterans Administration,*                     No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been determined suitable or unsuitable this week.                

Dated: February 18, 2010.

Mark R. Johnston,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.

[FR Doc. 2010-3606 Filed 2-25-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
**EXHIBIT 31 — SECTION 302 CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Theodore L. Arena, and I, Thomas J. Mulroney, each separately certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Provena Foods Inc. (the“Company”); 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and l5d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the Company and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including any subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Designed such internalcontrol over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

 

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5.The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors:

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) Any fraud whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: July 29, 2004