i-/rmo rch l e t:f a r }() 

V'Y\r. /rbaf A-cosh> 

I ,, fllllrY 2o IS 

r'\ r.lro~ l<Ze Pe~kUI)si =lf;'IBr;BZ(e 

nc:r- '/JI ~ ])~ ~ J ft<i'.f u~~,J­

'R-t ~ 2- l> t!X ~t/00 

~ El-ifts ~ i II <Z- I~~ a.r '7 fe sc; 7 

/Ol a l'd(.P .. 32153;3L/1 

35 

~ "J.n'\ fr()l)lcA l>\S y(llA... 2 eu-bh-1 ~of'J f rn'j 0rt"9(A&--f /)ffcz?l 

fiAo-rJo,J 5 \'([qiJ{i;~-/)!I ra·krt'\ 5trrvica.. 113 _t(hla:c1 &.~~~d··('ofy -/o 

M.a ..... ~ m/C ~w ~ a-ll ~wr {,:~fL.-J aJI-oAs 1 'j)Z-b~<Vl<JZ 2/\ol S:zc-Vto:z_ 

l~ f\ . -Ut t" .s rYl 2-.f+ar-

~cts{ A~j 2rJ s.) 

2e,~ 

RECEIVED IN 

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 

MAY 05 2015 

Abel Acosta, Clerk 
:.IIJ R6: 

~ feA:tz. 1(- ~ Lt.z_ {6,)(i....S, 

71><:,.-s" No. J'l8o8'U, 

Zt\1 TH£ Cot.A(rr oF 

c. itt ,...(I rliN- A-I {J act L ~ 

7'"E!$1T5 

f/A13~S eo{L/h15 AfPliCAtJIS 0~\61~A--L 1/f(>e:rrL- IN /f;trfjt;yt& 

Co(LPuS ;,.~ 6t"..-~i.,frl. usES -'?urst.t<?ni- ./., -r; ~JI. P.) ~(¢ 3/-zl~. 

fb -r/1£ fl-aM ougu~ CtN fi:T'" b f:' e,u Mt/-lkL fr fP F:ffLS oF -rEX ItS J ~ ST; e.g'S = 

COMe5 /llcJW J lroj /_aiZ .PcrrbA.s JIll c=r No~ I ;,8 0 8 t4 ; w h ..,.,., /.:J /'lr:lj 

1t,.l ;rrroR.. n ~:;y ; y d, "-'' S I, ~ 4, ,·.s ('(/\) rz_.T .J.... II ,.(LN -Jd.i .s !'-fo71o rJ _I i j,Q2t (!, J 

CWisfr<~<zt;l '" 1tdiJ;tMz;r, 'f'o sac~ fu<>h. ff21>"><r.S ··v. J&:in<Zr;''lb.<;t W<;;. 

5 I ? ) 7 z.. 5. f:l::, 57</_ j1> l- C-4 .. z eA (p sz _ . 

'<

:· 

,·,· 

,'.- / ·. 

lroJ. ~ 'J41¥itg #:l~8o82.~·; h.ero:in af-kr llfp/i~~+:; CtjJij 

J, /:1" · J CUI) r:f" ./o II ffatl h:~.s 5f~k ( --r. t. t. f. , 2r~lo 'l ") 

,_ . _ · · 1 ·· · · '·A r .s ~~ ?urs u.-zr, f /o/ 14. e s 

f\ t:!-6 q2J (fu<('V S JU.et sq;~l"t" - -r Fl ...... ·. ·.. . ·. / • : I 

'}lu\~ ,r Rp~//g/r/?r•cdurcJ lZula .Jid~- 7· /)fpJ,ceA.ss-1:-~ h2-bcU!.S t!o-t'f14$ we.s f'l(Uaf JurJ'7J 'ur 2fp/(c~ 

.' 
. .. . - ~ . . . . .• . . ~ 

-Upr.M ,lfpp/(c2of!s sf~ ~eb<Zas ?(oc..rc.eol''njs; i'n ~c. 

2..82-011. Ju.~ ,·c,·e-r 1)t.$&Cvf L'Q\)rt J C.2LtS<t: /lo,s IA.Jo7- DO(QI..fS(A)~ 

., ,,.4;~? .. ,2''7"1 rAJ ~·w o 1~ '1l'l7'l>{11)~ .~~· · ~o '7.;.7/'l'l o tA) ; . A~ . "' , ' ,• • • r f ' 

·ln·21 cov.+s C( r:;~ J"•'j$ of: fae-1- .~.· ~d~$:::,_5 iL.;:.; ;; ~ ..... •;·~· · ~;;. • • , r , • , 

~ . . . . ; ... ' ... :''.. ' . "-'· (,',, 

• <ti"rcrt"\e(J\) s I ~f · nz.C \ ac-+ Gl; p p I r c'i{1+f '' l~~vtF~,· ..,.,,1[1·5 ft; ·. {~. : · • 

,A PPV.c 11-tl o ,J •: a~ : ., ~.. lf~ 25S¢r-l-s , ~ ~+ k:s c. 2.$.-z:. ; ~ ~ ;~ ···•·· . 

'· h ~N¢ ·• h~ :; h~t<!ro! 6.5 <1· · M~l ~./j ;,o:is f:,U rf 'as > 1r:N i1&eJ. ih~1 , · ... 

· .,<Z.x, H¢e 1~ i ~ ~~- Co J<Z- ···-A 11rL · ~ k 1 (Q ,; 0 0 z. .! •. ·, • . < · ~:. ·· , :-·'·, · .' :_ .. __ . 

•' ·' ' ; >' /' ,• ,_·,· - .- . c • - .. 

I!Jh<tra:<1s ;. :Z:"' ~cz.. r:SfeM /<4$fm.!i:L ._t llfplieal:t~· ,, 

f.s>r lA.)~ •+ J ~2.~<eaS 6r f u:S ) j llpp I tc. ufs '2:-.ss-/.( es . . . .. 

... /'kff!Set>, IN l}fNJcAI1D~" ~o;racfl~ f't~~d :fia+ ·~ . · 

/ . ; , •i .- . . . ," • . (\) , . - • -; . .. . . . • . . - ' :.. , i' .. , ' y ;. . { >>· .. a.:./ _;. 

p ppHC-21>-b . fi\J~-kq .··. ~· .~P I~ : o o 3 .. · J · +lf . Jkg_!.J-4. ~~,f>,}~ ' . •. f ' ' ' / 

('6 Jq; ~2.) '.' ~ ~J J,ia-ll!"'(;,~al _ wt;s 11\(t~¢:*111€ .._'":_- --;.,: ,r; . 

. . · t:/!J((M- .· ~~e'D ':l)r> ~~p-(( ' .. - ;,~ ,,, .<: . .. . • I . . . . . Is. :. . .. . . .. , . , . . . .. , . , . . . . . , . . . . . Q 
~o·(l;. )..,J-.hcz.. £qve\ ,?..-~''(/>"\ ~ ~ Law~ i11 hi.s 

U~ .S* Cvnfi ,-,ur,ot-JitlLY 'P(Lo~"t) '1{\~#fr TO f/lfTJEYJ-s eotPu..s _ 

. /)ff J ,· C 211~ t 811 ~Q/YI~ m-~+a: ;-H. ?f: , .bv.J . CxtuvfiSrcl :S 

i" cr ff¢ i vrc 11<r ss; · a pP I i ctn+ w "'I ol rw.vcr. r h ~a: "P, 0 <:J:Ze,{cz-o/ 

-1<> --1/..L nzs u I er {!:(I'm '.I) 2-1 ju <;f/CP' .:!, ~ f: -hv>1 .- 7/-.,. ~ (' 2n 

ba.. o\cvrl c#l s+ratttol s ~ trN n 5<2:.1 '~ ''fUh ·vhw/1- J 13 ;,+ ... ..,.._ ·-----

rY'\ rlln "> 1 E' o\ e.:~ .£ ~"¢ 't-o IV ) w\.a.ra. Cw f1Stt: I d 2L""S h~ 

2 11 J :L of' ·sCM ~~of m j : ~~I hui.Jt. h t' s-lo'J 2 -~af ; .fl. ,:r 

· . Cw ns11. { (lo /;,-; t,/ tuv.-} sf,~~ cvY'car~ ~r<t) refused -k . 

. · t14~ bou~. ob \ i '3;rt-,-..,s . j,. ttri vasf a ; r~~s C,t,; P, ,Art. .. \..: 

'fr, !) ; lo '2.- Civ i I t ffr"1 ,., Hf~ qnf /-ker i ".S : rt'lczl1+~ I ±I I n<tSS {a) 

......... 1) /fs J.1,.,·J i.s a "fl1~~a+or.'1 s.fa+--k" ; ;+ ·M'-',;1: '8~ • 

. . lt"P lfeiaeV TO 11/SD 'PoYl~ _ '-'fA~.$) ltn~ ~rQ c~<tol /~~ ·.~ a~+ · • ----- . J 

.·- no-\- .c.\\~ ol > Jcu.c1 *' :II M ?f1 d. a+o~ ~f-z-fv_--k 11 jl\ \) 9\ ~ c\ *S' 2n~ .1' ro CJted ,~ s rpwsu.~ ·}o ,.U 1';$ ,_ bu-b'irr-ra ;,: lft.J 81 t. ·· 

. _5(A) 2c.l 3 88 -. It/ SO r},~~ ffr-z.-hA j ('CNIISIIZ( o/<'cJ /1()+ ·hruz·· . ..... . ... - "· ..... "" ......... "'. . 

.l . 
. ..(',·;: "') C<Mil M, -zr-cJ J: ~<t- ~ 2-:-cl \ "2W S ? a h In i n5 -/<:l 

~ i..s el ((Vlf- . ~cNf\5<£ I) aLso) n:r;ru..s<rof -/o a!:, id.¢. 1:-y r<x2s 

C, Cr~ ~)A-t\-\ c\a. \ ~, 2 Z.- ~A-JvllrJ~T lo~ ltrS\) TflANS~ oF . 

. . 

])e.P"asDANr ..St.l.jft;--&,C:-'7) .. of: t/f1111!U~- rvi€-~TAL rctivt:--sS ~.., _ . .. ' '' ' ' ' 

"*'~If! f . /~. ;0 0 (l ~ tf M1t01JB~O R-Y. ?71117A~, ; -lh 2 f . . . 

l<Z.2v~S. f)o roCJV'#'\ k o\.'str<ZtrM_ {lVN.SeL-· Wtl-S~~ 

~CFrfiCT,~~; ktSD) ;/lr-p L'cN~S£L ?er-R>(?_f\4w 1-f,s. ~~·n­

'li'N~·1zef~~) fft.5 t.l-.teTSrS ,.;~TilL 7tLN~$ ; 1/ffltcl"+ 

~cvlol -~~·cz_ o~<ll\ h,.~ 71lAnsM -ro · M~' tf~tTff 

(10 L17y · C ~afmaA.f 2r:.J ·v\~esno'sis/c?)(2,;q• · (;, ~ .U~ ,' 

' ', , \ . ' ' >' 1 • ' ,. , ' .- ··' :' f. • •: ·' : ' :, :. ~ ~ .' \ ,;. ·. : . ;' ' 1 ~ ~ ; • • 1 .• • ,· • .' / ~ ~ ;,_.~ ••• j'' ; . • 

"' 2-5 (s{-r ak ; {JJ"" o¥1 ) i (I -k r 11 l wov\ o\ . h e-v <L b <£<in ~owfj ' 

bw (\ o\ " ./-o 0 ff ~r -A. a ;/:ipp It c 2il + J. ,·..S '' t#Pl Ct" tl ~· v.X.~· ' ''I '. . 

6N c;:r ~. 1' a() ttt!) -rtfYl O'rJ ~ /.i ~ . 1/J ~It A~¢ I il /1ff It c q,fj; • • • " • • • • l ' • • • • : • :·. . ; • : • . ; • • • .. • j ·: ; ': • ; -' .. • ~ • . ... . ·.: 

O<L\~IN~L 1-1413~ Co.flP'1-'·s. ~U'0 Tt? -~ fl;'f/IS il-cwt-rl{ A~9 .. _ • • • ' ) 1 • • •• 

. · .... 

511F€r( t.ot:>~ /fr!N. ·.§ t I~- 003. {-t) ( $) _ -rf;;-s. "frvzrrfz-1 _ - ~ . .. - / ' • . • • : • -~ t • 

;II nq u ''{ 1-ftx~ r(i-1) (!dl.) CLl. J. o e:5 ~"o + h 2J a ~a eu-tlt.~r. ?J: . . 

~ .5v1-heACic ~.feii.'J ,·;J.p~·c,:f#>is ~ :fia S.f2-hz ··• .··.·. 

?<P~e~·/2'j J (;..Jbr~·l!tt lt'cv-f h2S b<ta/1> ;s-1~ck • -
'.) 

-C/1t16 ~ ~R. f)f(Jrffl-L TtJ 

~.e-M-AN~ .~·-. . .. . . .. - . ' . ' w\\\-\ -r~~~Tlo~.S-- ·~ .. . . " 

... :. " -~-·. . 

f/s fl. is llnl/c2/1+ has n<?JJ<Z:.r h~o\ his ~ilhMs 

e><4'ivf•~W 6 1( r/t:j'ftrl.:o lA· '1'1'/E' Tfl.lkL t'oVR,"r ; ~"t;), '-rff/s . . . . 

. 11-ffUMArr 1#}$: :P&;,~~~An:~· ( Wtit-(DiiJ4 · {'uvrrr toNs 

. IN ..,+/1S lfff elf() .-t1-fil'r fft .f. {'ell) tJ~"'?.. IiJ ef;f= ~I"'~' A-s · . -

$14 CH .- Ft:?r( ; 'Du ~ ?tlo C6S!$ C ~~o .Ltfft /tl t; HT) 1) ~;"-1 -'INlbS 

· C~t-77r 1115 .frsSJSTf\~-'C£ ~~ C<N~SGL· .... lfffuCA::.rr ll"'o_--- - ' ,· - . ' . ) rTt-J ) 

. -

:-9 e)-1 o~ s-nU\'1 e::s fits e.'l..frwl -ro f:. t: '' C #II rJ6 ~ ., v ;, . · ·. · - · , ~ !J Lil I L chJ (U$. 

.• . ' . - ., . ' > . . 

(lrJ J> 1 rJ ~s o~ ptrc_:-r • j C/t'-1..51 ,u 1, It tftt vtN-r.s tJ L l'h ~ 6ft •. . . 

f/e¥1 a•N~ > .11N1> .· (10\.lltQ . /VI k,..,ll> +-iz>,( . .Y. 1/<A'iY w.M:. rJ:oT-'{iJtW>JE'Y:>j . .. . ., ' • • ,. • • • ,, ••.• ._, • -~ .,._ •• ' •. ~ ·>- •.•• 

-t1t <-~ .s ) -{til Itt 6N n:r ? Mt.T 1 ce--s t.JfR e:- A¢r lfO u (JlfJ ~ ..: .y-h/"s ·· 

Cov (t"(' .S · flvYP> "'R 0V1 Mi> .J/1 ;:; A ff I i C2tvfS ~If f3 FitS . {'u.f.f''<S 

- : . . . ' - . . ' - - . _. .. 

"flloC@ (~t," ~tiCK- -;o>·r'ff~28~ d :fv D ICtll'L l>l("ll•cT rwa:r:; 

w •-rio/ .D.~. lt4-CoT ~~ Po;(.. .. .If . ~ tL ljt-)"b fi.'t•IZ ev I i)f./JTl A#-~ "•-" .... ·I !I 
.. tfefl'rfll ,..) ~ 1 

/tf f ()I"' -n tJ ~ {'(/\)tv Se:z... TO t1PP Ll c/tiiJI ; H> ({. 14 Ff:H ~ 

f(loo ~toSS I- IN $Tlf,.li. en 0 rJ s TD ~I( ..WT fl;!fig e-ns COitPI.I. s TO 

APP Ll CAf\J, J o "'c€ ~"L L ev' o a> c.t7 is n tV J ~-~ el) ) J' Cii."B .smNil ATh'5) 

13 Y A-ff I lc2fl+ $ tr/lJ.rJ5CL - ,/J,Jl) ) /1-L.L ontEt<. tft;14 rtt,;) liS. 

1)e~~J NEt...tSSfb!.Y bJ_ 4Jh~_J tO'UflT .-

... 

. _, A ff I ( c 211+ ?RA-Y..$ -JJ, ;-,s !' d't) (I_T () ~ANT .f/-J$ f} f p Gfli A;SJ:J 

6~-r .:.fi. is /} ff J i c ""+I }J ff<t:/12,.+ . a /j{_ €MAN'b 1)}tc:IG .:r:o .. ' ~ . . 

\ 11Uif{... C'WfLf (JJIJI./, Ad ..f)f?C~.Utf? Y IfJSTI2M tT IoNS · i"'C~ '· 

.· . : .· . . . ... .· .. . . . .. . .. -. ,- ·' . -· ; ( .. -'' 

. - . ' . ,. 

,f}• fM:L.L k~)) ~!?. bVrT)~TIIf-IV{ f!£:Yttll~ ~ 1}1\11) .lff(Jo,,JTM tNT . . . - · .. · : .· . . .. -. . - . . ,· ... ' .. : . - :' ' . - . . . . ' .. -·· . . ' 

·-of U/JN$~- :· - . ... - -; . . . 

~rl~is ·~·~ tAz

1 

J.' · .. • • .. . 'R_ct:Jf<t:~f.C.I0·S~~:·~;· 

~IW ZoiS.-- .·?:; __ ··_ --C~:··l::··~- ._. __ . _··_._,, ._· : ' . -- .. ·_ :...- '' - :~ . -

;T~ MA'11;'"J II hCt-H AA7! ();j · M r • 7' "") l.m?.. f.u k;Af/~ Ni:1Jj:z.r. ·. .· 

· (zau.sc.~I'7'1~ .. Y'·-. 

Ayh~tA /llfrll;.,.f, ~(2C/( ~P-zr)({ns,:itJ<f/3~82~ 1 hcrrczh J 1)EW12e:s, 

Ll ~ €<" · ?"'"' ~ '' ;f :p<u Jc~ 1 .fl. ;ak tU<Z'j -fl.. i '>5 •· h<:trtV 11 .fl. r <> 1'-' o 71 ON 1 > TJ~<itt' 

A-n I) Co fl-!1.. fV"' ~ {., #..e be s fc J' ""~ b cz I • crf- .. . · 

0(2.\(: C. 0 ~ /t'r o!= C.i<,i;_. I M\~· i1fl'oU.s ~ .$ . 

5 

/5/] : 'y;: .:.7::--> . ' 

a: (1 Ia: · . . .. · . · . . .. . ·. • . . . -r'r"'1 ~~a; P-:~.t.:..rtl'f&J821;; ·/111lftt.ll ~ z.Bt.. ~ -s. i>. c.. f./.41$ei!s 1><> c-. ,....~ ; . lJfp /1 C2/>t jt>tZ't/1/bi/NT' 

~rr, INI,s J c"" ttT I~ ~ E$PcM Je 1 A-fFi. M/' r .. ~ otter r-1 l'tfz.ri u I 
No. ______________ __ 

.IA RE~ 

£¥ fekz- -JroJ Lza.- {b-)(i,.s, 

/l)c..:-:f No. )tf8o8U, 

.ZI\l rHt Coa(U "F 

C..fl...t M I r/IK- /}f p eftL~ 

/"S'I.ft-5 

fl/113or5 _{!o(2_/)u.5 AfPU CA-tJTS ort~61 ,J.4-t.. flf(>etrl- '"' IIA1Jt::~ 

Co (LPuS J!'i ert~i('iKl (!__11-J(?S -1>u.rsv..2f'.fc -lo ~f.., A .. P. ~(¢ 3 J L 

) ~~~~ 

fO -rife flo!'i orurgt£ Cw W <> P e.a.t M ',.;.A'L ltfP effL.S oF 'ltX/1-s ~ ST ... ~ - . . J ~~ I ~~~ -

~ /J<10, /ro .'J )_p.q_ .Par bAs, II> t,J ,/o. I 'f8 D f!H.fe ; tJ)., UWI p l'l<>T 

111-' kfro R..n 0( _; 4 d J r,JI 5 h tr.S -ft., ".s Cd\J rU -~ 11 {q_vJ ...U.i s f"io7T o AJ I j h£(2.llf,J 

C?Jsfr~~ ;'l Mt~ tpt"O .srz·~ &or_ ifai,-,a:s v. l&:rn<Zr, sr" ¥ uu;;;. 

51 '7 :> 'i z. s. R:. n<G :Jo L. EO(. ·z..A 4, sz _ 

/roJ /fta. '741 kl"5 ,'ifHBo8 ~ ; "-eaz•il o.PW lffp /(c:~f: ; (JOM<Z-' 

J, /;i,-s Cd\) iCf ./o /1 ffaa.f Ar.s 5fa.k {-f. t. C.. f_, 2J{. 1\-o 'l) 

· _ -f -(hr.s ~~ ?wsuu-.-f- /o "'T<ZX 2 S 

h~6a2J ~~eu.s JuAS~ ~ . . .~ ' 

1<-v \ttS J' !J-pptel J:;t~r&? r• uu1 vr.c > 1Za l e 3 r et .5<et; • - f) fP J, C21t+ s 

s-l:ehz. hz,ba:BS ~fU.S ~25 f1(bla/' J:urJd ur 2ffllc~ 

CLAJ14S-
.-J(ll kG &;\Jr'tr ~o(LS 

l~pCM /1-pp /tc211f!s- s+~ heb<Uhf .?(o~,n_:r~ }~ tn --U~ 

. . 

2-82-~ :J\A_~ .-ctz,f 1)t.j-/Yiv-+ i'uurt-) C:2uS<Z f\o.,s 1Do7- DOfu'/scA-)~ 

Luory- 'IP7b1 {A)., IAJo1·-1 \q70{A) J CW;( 10o'7-1JC}qo C11) ; J,he 

b-,-~I cdl) .+s C£ h .J"J) II\ 'j .s .,~ Yec* ar.l c,.., ol.:<s I On .5 J L 20 " 

<tt"r-CN'\a;,(J\) .s I~ nz:r\ Q.C--+ a p f I r C-2rd:f lf:r.ss \.{ ~ s 7t lh 5 E'D . I"' 

IJPPLI CAIIorJ II. a5 ; ·" ~- ff<L- cSS'<U-f-s ~ ~+ ht".s- C25<Z: s hou)o\ 

h~ btazn ~<Z2rol bj a M~l d}f\(CS:S i?ovy{: as tVrD\J \c-Ad b· . , ~ 

'I rtX, Jfa;al+-it .t S ~J:J Co ot<Z, A lln, §- lo 1 {g, o 0 2. 

VJh.~~s; In -J..hCL. cSfe~ ,'R!zsr.s:z_./.. IJfplfee-h~. 

for iAh t\- ,k lfa.b~a.s Ca-r f u..s , > /} ff J i c ~.s '2:-ss- u e:s 

'R-A-t seD 11'1; flfPLJcAT!otl '' c~c:Hj . ra.-Pi~ ~81 ~e 

ll pp I /~2/1- -1: q uo-kcl'\ /o I lo , o o3 J. ~ fkg_f~ ~ s~~ I ·C. J ( 2...) - 1 I -\ z.-.\ &N (\ scz.l w z..s i 1\ a.Ff<td-( lkL ---- • n'". , .... , ~ -r-r I;> "'-" ) 

f//J((rJI ('M~eD 1)'( &((_o~ 

IJ fP II e. 2ft"{- h a.~ no+ ~ e~<ZOI '"!)(.{ e Pf!x> CESS 
" 

f\o(l...)~<r- EqiJe\ ?~ll/"1 J: ~ Lzw~ J, hi.s 

u ..~6 Ccmf/t/lA/IDNftlLY ~(l..o~ 1(.\~ffl 10 f/lrT3e7S t-DR..PfA..S_ 

/)ff}{cCAf C.;?.~J r)<ZP>QYl~k;~'ifi: ,.bJ "<2oNf\Srcf:S 

\.'""c:rWa::.cfive-nes:s; 8pP Jicen+ w,rv\o{ rvwa.r h~a:: rp{occzet?icrol 

-4 k nzsulzr UlrAI'f)el ju<>h'cu-- .:Slj'!:-km ~ --tf,,-..s l'2,1 

ba. JvvrJ oY1 s+ra-ku>l b ~ {'ctV fl 5<t:..f' ~ •r /I .If,-c.J. a.;,} J 13 ,nd 

f'() erl\n II ) ·? tr ~ e.J t ~nq;, 2o IV ; w~ra:- &tv r15a;l eA e/rns h<z: 

2flol :C JrSe-u::>szd 1>1.-j ~cd h=I-JJ.. his~ _ ~cz_f ;-1:/,,:s 

Cw n S<Z I {flo fr; -z-1 twy-\- s-fr~ ~ Ctr>'ICLun h:z.flz:) ·~sd -k 

~~ bo~ o\J\\1)2f"(6rlS .J. ~G(Ua$-/:; a)-/d'J(2S t,tr, e>~-\iJ¢. 

i~ J) , io 1-- (/v ( / L'~ ~ i tt~Clfl+ /-k2r j Aj :: rtl<z;J+e--1 I I \ f\CZ:S s {;J) 

i) A-s fi,·.s i.s a u rtl21'1d~.forj s-ba~ -k '' ; ,-+ !'A l-< sT 13E 

fr-o 11-etl(lt!V TD At-'l> 'WYl!r ~ -A ... .s J !In~ rproc.c=olt~ or sc.:fnot ~ \ \(M)~ of ) olu.a. -/o tl M 2t1 o\ 8.--f-v'J ~~&~ 11 

. lr'\ \) e,\ \ ~ ~-s 

2nj 'f'o~1A_¥ rpv.rsu~ )o .. ./1Js ,_du.f::,.q;rrcrce- "· L=J BIZ.. 

5 W zd 3 88 _ Iff So dt<Z/VI 0>1 d-.-z..f,~ j t C'I){\9Z;( okol no+ haRz: 

·' 
· · ~Crvt Cuw~r->ZNJ J: R<L .f.wh. ~c\ l2-c.-.\ s ?<!:d--"3i!l ;,5 -/a 

h~-.s d (<VJ.f.- t'3wn>a:l J also) ~s<W/ -/o gbid..cz:., b~ 25 

C, Cr; {),) A-tt-l" c\ a. \ le, 2 Z.. - ~ rtlVII ,.J ft'T 1 o ~ rt1--> \> ~s Fef_ o-F 

1> eF'ersDittJT" c.5 u .5 fareD oF /#tV! ('J ~ f1/l ENTA-L V.. L tJ ES ~ __ _ 

-*-rlfl _5 . I .5 ;vt o f'l G' 'rMAt0TJA-TO R-Y 571117AIF '

1 

j~ -fh ~ft~2V'rzS /10 ("'00'("\ ~ J..{5U<Ltr~_ CCI\)f\)56L WA-S -:r:N-

-l?;fF ~I tJ g ; fiND j ;!A-D tVu NS 6L ? 8( r;::b (Uvt G'\) His ])fA 7Y 

/(N1) f(efoitr~ 1-{1.5 tJ_t eJVI.S M{i]JTftL liLNt?SS ; 1/ ff )1"c21\+ 

IDC\J\o\ h~cz:- so~ hr~ /RAnSFef<- /0 M~ tfef:JLTJI 

FRcl '-<17'/ > for -/.--drfiOfl+ 2rol c.l.l es/\osis/ c:ZJ(8n1 ~ ~<Z 

I"\ 2-3 rs.f-r~; (;J)..(hl'l > !11 J,._r,, wov\J h '2N<L b<m:n "o\M*' 

boV"o\ '' h olf<if -!{_a- !l-ff 1,--c2r>f h i..s ''{!flo IC£'' of ltJ\.,~ 

~£/\) ~\ TD 7fl-\) at;"t> -rfhe.(J\J6 H - /f..s tJV1' J t/taol lfl l}ff ,,.. C7A+=> 

0 (2.,\~1 NlfL 1-/413 m..5 ~D{L ()v't S (lUJ fv1 70 ; ·!Bflts lfefi tTJ-1 JtA)}) 

SITH:iTY f.ot)Y f1rJrJ. t /;I~, 003 [z) { t>) _ -r/r ,·s "f"\<vthl 

i II Y)('?s.r''( J..(ty:wr/.1) t!d'J (1_{ 0. b a:S no+ h u a: ~ au...flta~, b 

~ .5v1 kA Ctc:. nYt-felly /I I 7z.b Crf2,, -Is f., -fiq;c s-f~ 

?@'l~·vJ ) r.J~(tZ" /1ff f,C.a.-1- h2s b<nZ/1 st~c.rz: 
CfftAS & s(t)R.. fjf{JeftL TO 

1ve-f'l1fttS~ W\\~ ~..511GL\ ~T(otJ.S 

f/s .Jh ~-s /Jpf l/c2/lf hes rt<Wczr haol his C!..LII-J/'1S 

~ J~Bi) 6 (( rfeftfl.-D I rl ~ JTl-lffL. {'cAJR..T ; ltN"t) -rtftS I 

/(ff Lt t,4All f!,q-.5 1)eY/6{'! 57)'2AW)) {.J::IJ t!I-UD 1 JJ 67 trN flT tofi~·- · 

I rJ -rr/1S Iff (J eflL) -/1-l-lrr f/1.5 trJU }JSGL IiJ eff= e:ra-1 v £?' 11-s 

5 t1 ct./ ,_ ~{(. ; 'D (A_ 6 ? rw cess (" ,crJ>So .Lu TC /t( ~ HT) '1:> EM~tl\l])S 

E«6?:;f 1\/6 f)-SSJSTf>rfJC£ o·F Mr-J.SGL - lfffu CA7Jt 1}-L.So . . ) ) 

~ tM or-) S-nLA1 es H1 s U;H r-1 TO 136' f( C+/-11-rJ 6Ft) -g, y CO\J rcrs ' 

Ylr-JJ> lrJ{iS ~ p:ffc.7" j C/trA..St~l, lrl'f'L-; CAN-r:J ~Lihtvi oF 

\) e>J I flL- crf r-t ~ f/e'ftl--nf Cd\J(CI, t: (!.Cr. f.. ji-m ct£ 4 (g 13 ,I o l 

1 ~ (lt rJ ~ /ftJ"D {jN (L.lS ;vt A-;Jn lf-'72> ,e_. Y ~CAW VJ ItS. AS o-r FD t{£JMJB1:> ... n~n ) . J 

'"fi t.t.S 

1 

1\'V At- LW itl ?Me-n tt::S (,Jffii Ntil R> u.oW f!l ~ -rf.u:S 

.• 

LW Q.-"(' ~ /leN L"t) 1< (;WI f\7-.\i:> Jl, ,:; f} f f I; c JA-h tf~rf3 Y/-S Ci,) tU't.tS •'.• 

"f flo CE@ ( ~t, 1)/IC.-i(... /D ~ 28'2-~ J \AD I C 1/I"L '1:> Jsri2-<cT M IZT; 

w ,--r'1-t ~src'Ltt,a 1 <0s ro-t<- ~ ~ LL fn-.)1> ffl, r<_ GV''OeJ-n Az,L-y 
.. r/Bi'r<U .J q J /tf Po I fV 71 rJ ~ 6N rJ se,-z_. -ro 1/{J(J Li C/trVI ; f=O it_ 11- Ff:H ((. '' 

"f0o cm;s 1- J;N.$f'VAe;rl o,JS -rv GtttWT f#h~e:ttS CoRJ!iA.S TtJ 

{1ff U CANT J o rJC£' 1/'U- Bll I t) a> c..€ (S 'Rf\11 E-10 t1l , 5 '1. "B S77W11 A'T~ 

1) y tl-ff I i c 2{\+- 5 I!(/\) ~~a. - jl-,.:>1) J /r{A..-- DT't+£R.. tfeyg- (tl ,;) fi 5, 

·1) ~ e\J ~ a E:SS ~t-IL Y b ~ ../At i ..s Co'U flT _ 

?eJW~ 

If ff 1 "c 2/1+ ?ruw s ..J4.;s t(}l) Ill c.; ~T -fl. ,:s fJ fP etn- liND 

6t2.J'trSI _;ft. i .s /Jpf J i ez,.,·f-/ /} ffrz:/!211+ a ·Cit EM A-N 1:> 'l"lft-cA<- TD 

-rtU /t1- (!p,) ~~ (JJ I II/ f}tL (I er:-i33.5!7R-'f I)-J ST {2lA tT IoNS 'ft> ~ 

If fi-tc.-c A?-1\l t:+tt rc 811 /1) EN -n MY J/etttu~ r, f)dl) !1ff o, rJTM tEN, 

. ()~ cuv~seL-

£Xa:cu~J. -Mti s I co\ .. ~ ! 

}ll JW 'Zo IS'_. 

Ir-> ,.4A.~ 'D ~hAA--710~ 

(-z-6 t.t->c ~ I '7'-/(o J 

#-5ftuJ--.CI0 .0~ n'l·,i{eot 

~?!_~ 
Scanned Aug 06, 2010 

~ 0 c: c::t 

~!£~:- E 

WRIT NO._:W07-00645(A); W07-71769(A); W07-71970 & 9 A'f;:~ _ _.,__ ~ cP-· 

THE STATE OF TEXAS 

v. 

§ 

,f § 

C')~;::.~ 

IN THE 282N° J~JAI.J.1! -1m"''· :S: :::' ~-::cL S l"f:l -:::1'.:.:. •• 11, (;;' 

DISTRICT col§~T ~ 

TROY LEE PERKINS 

I § 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS 

AFFIDAVIT OF BRET MARTIN 

STATEOFTEXAS § 

§ 

COUNTY OF DALLAS § 

Before me, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared BRET MARTIN, 

whom I identified by his Texas driver's license, and after being duly sworn, stated as follows: 

''My name isBretMartin. I am over twenty-one (21) years of age, of sound mind, have never 

been convicted of crime involving moral turpitude and am competent to make this affidavit because I 

have personal kno~ledge of the facts stated herein and they are true and correct. 

"I am a lawyer licensed to practice in the State ofTexas since November 1995. l have 

practiced criminal law in Dallas since that time both as an Assistant District Attorney and as a lawyer 

in private practice. I have been in good standing with the State Bar of Texas at all times. 

"I was appointed to represent a man by the name of Troy Lee Perkins back on March 27, 

2007. Mr. Perkins was being charged with four separate aggravated robberies, in Cause numbers 

F07-00645, F07-7l769 and F07-71770 & 90. The offenses carried a range of punishment between 15 

years confmement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice and life. due to the Defendant having 

an enhancement paragraph resulting from a previous trip to the penitentimy. The Defimdant was 

initially offered 40 years in TDC by the prosecutor handling the case. 

"I interviewed Mr. Perkins and discussed with him the merits of each ofthe cases against 

him. We also discussed all of his options that he had available to him. Those options were l.) to try 

to work out a plea bargain in the case; 2.) to plead guilty and allow the court or ajUI)' to set his 

punishment if he did not like the plea bargain offers; 3.) plead not guilty and present his case to the 

Judge to decide his guilt or innocence; or 4.) plead not guilty and present his case to a jury and allow 

them to decide his guilt or innocence. I also explained to Mr. Perkins that there was videotape 

evidence of him committing these offenses and the difficulties tltat such evidence would present. Mr. 

~ 

~{F(~ 0-

Perkins decided to proceed to a jury trial. 027 
-- ... ·--·-r----~----·----·. -·-· 

Scanried Aug 06, 2010 

He understood the factual allegations against him as well as all of the <:<onsequences of the decisions 

which he was making. 

"On 'the morning of January 7, 2008, we gathered in the 282nd District Court in preparation f 

for a jury ~al and the jury arrived and we were soon to begin the voir dire process. At that time, the 

Assistant District Attorney made an offer to Mr. Perkins to drop his enhancement paragraph and give 

him 12 years on each of the four cases. That was three years below the statutory minimum that he 

could receive from the jury and 28 years below the prosecutor's initial recommendati:m. 

"During my representation, Mr. Perkins appeared to be of sound mind and good judgment. 

Mr. Perkins understood tlie serious nature of the offenses and the consequences of proceeding to jury 

trial. He also understood that these cases would require him to serve a minimum of 50% of his ,. sentence because of the deadly weapon fmding. He was provided legal representation the entire time 

he was .incarcerated and had communication with me throughout the entire process. Mr. Perkins and I 

discussed his mental health history and he acknowledged and agreed that while that was a part of his 

medical history, that in no way contributed to his committing of the offenses. Furthermore, I am 

{', . ~ certain_ that there was no mental health problems involved in his understandi~ or his decision making J.tnM ~ regarding both sides reaching this plea bargain agreement. It was simply thebes~ mo~;t responsible 

ape_ ~~ manner in which to resolve these very dangerous crimes. The Defendant was well infi)rmed and 

1 l/11.~ . absolutely understood the options that he had and the consequences of each and every choice that was 

\ l>'J available to him." 

fl cf"lu.e.v e..r J A -1u.r, r • 1---t Further. Affiant sayeth naught. 

I?S 1/1fo . 

'7 P3 c)cl.rd.frrJI- sRETE. MARTIN 

SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME. this 1 tl day of J ..... c.. . 2010. 

My commission expires: 

028 
EX PARTE IN THE 282nd JUDICIAL 

~~'1ISTRICT COURT OF 

TROY LEE PERKINS § DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS 

STATE'S RESPONSE TO APPLICATION 

FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 

The State, having considered the allegations contained in Appliqmt's Application for 

Writ of Habeas Corpus in the above-numbered and entitled cause, makes the following 

response: 

I. 

HISTORY OF THE CASE 

Applicant entered a plea of guilty on January 7, 2008 to the charge of aggravated 

robbery by using a deadly weapon. He was sentenced in this case, and for three like offenses 

in three other cases, to 12 years' confinement in prison. The four sentences run concurrently. 

Applicant waived his right of appeal. 

This is Applicant's first application for writ of habeas corpus. 

II. 

ISSUES RAISED IN APPLICATION 

Applicant asserts (1) he was denied special needs representation and treated without 

concern for his mental defect, supposedly in violation of §616.003 of the. Health & Safety 

,. 

0 

1 
Code, (2) unspecified court procedures were not followed and his trial counsel was 

constitutionally ineffective, (3) he is not receiving proper psychiatric care contrary to the 

Eighth Amendment, ( 4) he is incarcerated with numerous violent persons, who constantly 

psychologically abuse him, contrary to the Eighth Amendment, and (5) he did not receive a 

speedy trial. 

III. 

STATE'S RESPONSE 

Applicant vaguely alleges some grounds that might entitle him to relief, but without 

sufficiently describing what occurred in his case that might constitute a constitutional 

violation. He further alleges things that would not affect the legality of his confinement. It is 

riot possible to respond intelligently to the Application. It fails to "contain sworn allegations· 

of fad father than mere conclusions." Cf Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 829 

(Tex.Crim.App. 1967); see also Ex parte McCain, 67 S.W.3d 204,209 n. 10 (Tex.Crim.App. 

2002) and Ex parte McPherson, 32 S.W.3d 860, 861 (Tex.Crim.App. 2000). 

It can be noted generally, however, that the conditions of incarceration do not involve 

constitutional issues. "[I]t is abundantly clear that a myriad of problems of prison 

administration must remain beyond the scope of proper judicial concern. Only significant 

.. deprivations ofliberty raise constitutional issues." Meachum v. Fano, 427 U.S. 215,235 n. 7, 

96 S.Ct. 2532,49 L.Ed.2d 451 (1976) (Stevens, Brennan and Marshall, JJ., di~$enting) .. "A 

habeas claim is not ordinarily thought to 'accrue' while the inmate is housed in prison 

2 
because habeas claims challenge the fact or duration of confinement (or restraint) rather than 

the conditions of confinement." Ex parte Rieck, 144 S.W.3d 510, 519 (Tex.Crim.App. 2004). 

IV. 

CONCLUSION 

The State respectfully requests that this Court recommend denial or dismissal of the 

Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus on its face. 

Respectfully submitted, 

CRAIG WATKINS 

CRIMINAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY 

DALLASCOUNTY,TEXAS 

MARTIN L. PETERSON 

ASSIST ANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY 

STATE BAR NO. 15838600 

FRANK CRU\XTLEY COURTS BUILDING 

133 N. INDUSTRIAL BLVD., LB-19 

DALLAS, TEXAS 75207-4399 

(214) 653-3647 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that a true copy of the foregoing response has been served on 

Applicant, Troy L. Perkins, TDCJ # 01480826, Wynne Unit, Huntsville, Texas 77349 on this 

8th day of May, 2009. 

MARTIN L. PETERSON. 

3 
c ·---~---~--=--~----~~ 

S~anh~d Aug 06, 2010 

EX PARTE 

Tr 04 Lee-- Per k.i· ns )I 

J 

APPLICANT 

CAUSE NO. W 07 -//t1<1D- 5lA) 

INTI-IE 2.~2 

* JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT 

• DALLAS COUNTY. TEXAS 

ORDER DESIGNATING ISSUES 

Having considered the applicant's Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus and the State's 

Response, the Court finds that controverted, previously unresolved facts material to the legality of· 

the Applicant's confinement exist. The Court finds that each of the allegations set forth in the 

application are controverted, unresolved factual issues which require additional evidence and/or 

testimony to be resolved. 

The court appoints April E. Smith to resolve the issues and prepare findings of fact and 

conclusions of law for the Court. The issues may be resolved by affidavits, depositions, 

interrogatories, or by hearings, as deemed necessary by the person appOinted herein. 

Above appointed attorney does not represent the Applicant. Applicant is riot entitled to . 

counsel ar this rime. 

The Clerk. of the Court is ORDF.RF:Dto...send !l.c.opy oftbis ord~r--t.O.th~ C..otu:t.of-Cr.i.mi-nal --

Appeals in Austin, TX, to Applicant, or Applicant's coW\Sel (if so represented) and to counsel for 

the State. MAY I 22009 

S. h" d f 2009 ... --·""' tgned t ts _____ ay o ________ . ....,. 1..,..\, .. ~ . . /..-·\(' ~f:L-----~\ ·o11: .~~J!rclm JUDGE 

.--
Scanned Aug 06., 2010 

EX PARTE 

TROY LEE PERKINS, 

APPLICANT 

WRITNO. W07-71769-S(A) 

* 

'* 

* 

I IN THE 282ND JUDICIAL 

DISTRICT COURT 

DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS 

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 

On this day came on to be considered Applicant's Application for Writ ofHabeas Corpus and 

the State'S Response. Having considered these pleadings and the official court records, as well as 

all exhibits and affidavits offered by both parties, this Court enters the following findirtgs of fact and 

.conclusions of law. 

lllSTORY OF THE CASE 

Applicant was convicted of aggravated robbery and was sentenced to 12 years confinement. 

This is his first application for writ of habeas· corpus. 

ISSUES RAISED IN APPLICATION 

Applicant asserts that he was denied special needs representation due to his psychiatric 

issues. He asserts that his case should have been heard by a mental illness court as provided by TEx. 

HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 616.002 

Applicant asserts that he was denied due process due to his special needs when court 

procedures were not followed and he received ineffective assistance of counsel. 

Applicant asserts that his sentence amounts to cruel and unusual punishment because he is 

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Page 1 
Scanned Aug 06, 2010 

not being afforded proper psychiatric care. 

Applicant asserts that he is being threatened in TDCJ due to his psychiatric issues. 

Applicant asserts l:.at he was denied a speedy ~ial. 

RELEVANT EVIDENCE 

Bret Martin, Applicant's attorney, has responded to the allegations by affidavilt. The Court 

finds him to be trustworthy. · · 

RELEVANT LAW 

Burden of Proof 

Applicant has the burden to allege and prove by a preponderance of the eviden<~ facts which 

entitle him to relief. See Ex parte Maldonado, 688 S.W.2d 114, 116 (Tex. Crim. App. 1985); Ex . 

parte Adams, 768. S.W.2d 281, 288-289 (Tex. Crim. App. 1989)~ Conclusory allegations are not 

enough to warrant habeas relief. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). 

Ineffective Assistance of Counsel . 

When an Applicant alleges ineffective assistance of counsel, Applicant must first prove that 

. . counsel's representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness; and secondly, that there 

is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result oft he proceeding 

would have differed. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 688, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 80 L. Ed. 2d 674 

(1984); Hernandez v. State, 726 S.W.2d 53, 54-55 (Tex. Crim. App. 1986). The right to counsel 

does not guarantee errorless counsel whose competence is judge by hindsight; rather, it affords a 

defendant an attorney reasonably likely to render reasonably effective assistance. See Thompson v. O ? .-. . -- 0 

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Page2 
Scanned Aug 06, 2010 

State, 9 S.W.3d 808, 814 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). Counsel's competence is prdsumed~ and 

Applicant must rebut this presumption by proving that his attorney's representation wru: unreasonable 

/ Wider prevailing professional norms and that the challenged action was not soWid strategy. 

Kimmelman v. Morrison, 477 U.S. 365, 384 (1986); Thompson, 9 S.W.3d at 814. 

Cognizable Issues 

Cognizable claims on habeas are limited to two categories: (1) jurisdictional defects in the 

convicting court; and (2) the denial of a fundamental constitutional right. Ex parte Williams, 65 

S.W.3d 656, 657 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001). The purpose to be served by a post conviction writ of 

habeas corpus is limited, and "lies only to review jurisdictional defects or denials of fundamental or 

constitutional rights." Ex parte Watson, 601 S.W.2d350(Tex. Crim. App. 1980). Failure to adhere 

to a legislative directive or mode of proceeding designed to safeguard a constitutional right will 

likewise be cognizable only when the omission results in the denial of a constitutional protection. 

Ex parte Sadberry, 864 S.W.2d 541 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993). 

Generally, conditions of confinement do not involve constitutional issues. Se(! Meachum v. 

Fano, 427 U.S. 215, 235 n. 7, 96 S. Ct. 2532,49 L. Ed. 2d 451 (1976). 

Speedy Trial 

Speedy trial claims are not cognizable in post-conviction habeas pro6eedings. Ex parte 

Owenby, 749 S.W.2d 880, 881 (Tex. Crim .. App. 1988) (violation of Speedy Trial Act is nonjurisdictional defect which cannot be raised on habeas review). 

FINDINGS OF FACT 

The Court finds that Applicant has failed to prove that he was entitled to have ltis case heard 

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Page3 
Scanned Aug 06, 2010 

in a "mental illrtess court". The statute cited by Applicant provides that the county may provide for 

such court. It does not, however, state that all cases where a defendant is alleged to be mentally ill 

shall be transferred to that court. Applicant has not proven that he had a mental illrtess which 

entitled his case to be transferred for disposition to that Court. Applicant's counsel indicates that 

Applicant was able to communicate with him regarding the case and understood the options for 

disposing of the case. 

The Court finds that Applicant has failed to prove that he received ineffective:: assistance of 

counsel. Applicant makes no specific allegations of ineffectiveness for counsel to respond to. 

However, counsel has provided an affidavit which sets out his representation in this case. 

Furthermore, Applicant has not stated which court procedures were not followed. 

With regard to issues three, four and five, the Court finds that Applicant has not raised a 

constitutional issue that is cognizable on habeaS. 

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 

The Court concludes that Applicant has failed to prove that he was entitled· to have his case 

heard in a "mental illrtess court". 

The Court concludes that Applicant has failed to prove that he received ineffective assistance 

of counsel. Furthermore, Applic~t has not stated, which court procedures were not followed. 

With regard to issues three, four and five, the Court concludes that Applicant has not raised 

a constitutional issue that is cognizable on habeas. 

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Page4 

I 
---~-----------~----·------------··-········----·------- ·----

Scanned Aug 06, 2010 

COURT'S RECQMMENDATION 

This Court recommends that this writ of habeas corpus be DENIED. 

I 

ORDERS OF THE COURT 

In implementing th~ Court's Finding of Fact and Conclusions of Law, the Cle:rk will: 

1. Prepare a transcript of papers in this cause and transmit the Court's Order and the Findings 

of Fact and Conclusions of Law, including the judgment and indictment, all plea papers, if any, and 

the Court of Appeals opinion, if any, to the Court of Criminal Appeals as provided by TEx. CODE 

CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07. 

2. Send a copy of this Order and the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law to the 

Applicant and his counsel, if any, by depositing same in the U.S. Mail. 

Findings ofFact and Conclusions of Law Page5 

026