Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 179 / Thursday, September 16, 2010 / Proposed Rules 56491 

How This Document Complies With the 

Federal Administrative Requirements 

for Rulemaking 

This action is an Advance Notice of 

Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM). 

Because it is not a ‘‘significant 

regulatory action’’ within the meaning of 

Executive Order 12866, the Executive 

Order’s requirement of cost-benefit 

assessment does not apply. ATF is 

publishing this ANPRM to seek 

information from the public about a 

replacement document for the 

‘‘Definition and Test Procedures for 

Ammonium Nitrate Fertilizer.’’ 

Similarly, the requirements of section 

603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act do 

not apply to this action because, at this 

stage, it is an ANPRM and not a ‘‘rule’’ 

as defined in section 601 of the 

Regulatory Flexibility Act. Following 

review of the comments received in 

response to this ANPRM, if ATF 

promulgates a notice or notices of 

proposed rulemaking regarding this 

matter, ATF will conduct all analyses 

required by the Regulatory Flexibility 

Act, Executive Order 12866, and any 

other statutes or Executive Orders 

relevant to those rules and in effect at 

the time of promulgation. 

Public Participation 

A. Comments Sought 

ATF is requesting comments on this 

advance notice of proposed rulemaking 

from all interested persons. ATF is also 

specifically requesting comments on the 

clarity of this advance notice and how 

it may be made easier to understand. 

All comments must reference this 

document docket number (ATF 26A), be 

legible, and include the commenter’s 

name and mailing address. ATF will 

treat all comments as originals and it 

will not acknowledge receipt of 

comments. 

Comments received on or before the 

closing date will be carefully 

considered. Comments received after 

that date will be given the same 

consideration if it is practical to do so, 

but assurance of consideration cannot 

be given except as to comments received 

on or before the closing date. 

B. Confidentiality 

Comments, whether submitted 

electronically or in paper format, will be 

made available for public viewing at 

ATF, and on the Internet as part of the 

eRulemaking initiative, and are subject 

to the Freedom of Information Act. 

Commenters who do not want their 

name or other personal identifying 

information posted on the Internet 

should submit their comment by mail or 

facsimile, along with a separate cover 

sheet that contains their personal 

identifying information. Both the cover 

sheet and comment must reference this 

docket number. Information contained 

in the cover sheet will not be posted on 

the Internet. Any personal identifying 

information that appears within the 

comment will be posted on the Internet 

and will not be redacted by ATF. 

Any material that the commenter 

considers to be inappropriate for 

disclosure to the public should not be 

included in the comment. Any person 

submitting a comment shall specifically 

designate that portion (if any) of his 

comment that contains material that is 

confidential under law (e.g., trade 

secrets, processes, etc.). Any portion of 

a comment that is confidential under 

law shall be set forth on pages separate 

from the balance of the comment and 

shall be prominently marked 

‘‘confidential’’ at the top of each page. 

Confidential information will be 

included in the rulemaking record but 

will not be disclosed to the public. Any 

comments containing material that is 

not confidential under law may be 

disclosed to the public. In any event, the 

name of the person submitting a 

comment is not exempt from disclosure. 

C. Submitting Comments 

Comments may be submitted in any of 

three ways: 

• Mail: Send written comments to the 

address listed in the ADDRESSES section 

of this document. Written comments 

must appear in a minimum 12 point size 

of type (.17 inches), include the 

commenter’s mailing address, be signed, 

and may be of any length. 

• Facsimile: Submit comments by 

facsimile transmission to (202) 648– 

9741. Faxed comments must: 

(1) Be legible and appear in a 

minimum 12 point size of type (.17 

inches); 

(2) Be on 81⁄2′′ x 11′′ paper; 

(3) Contain a legible, written 

signature; and 

(4) Be no more than five pages long. 

ATF will not accept faxed comments 

that exceed five pages. 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

Submit comments to ATF via the 

Federal eRulemaking portal by visiting 

http://www.regulations.gov and 

following the instructions for submitting 

comments. 

Disclosure 

Copies of the petition, this advance 

notice, and the comments received will 

be available for public inspection by 

appointment during normal business 

hours at: ATF Reading Room, Room 1E– 

063, 99 New York Avenue, NE., 

Washington, DC 20226; telephone (202) 

648–7080. 

Drafting Information 

The author of this document is Scott 

P. Armstrong-Cezar; Enforcement 

Programs and Services; Bureau of 

Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and 

Explosives. 

List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 555 

Administrative practice and 

procedure, Authority delegations, 

Customs duties and inspection, 

Explosives, Hazardous materials, 

Imports, Penalties, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements, Safety, 

Security measures, Seizures and 

forfeitures, Transportation, and 

Warehouses. 

Authority and Issuance 

This notice is issued under the 

authority of 18 U.S.C. 847. 

Approved: September 3, 2010. 

Kenneth E. Melson, 

Deputy Director. 

[FR Doc. 2010–23042 Filed 9–15–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–FY–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 1060 

[EPA–HQ–OAR–2010–0270; FRL–9202–3] 

RIN 2060–AQ18 

Technical Amendments for Marine 

Spark-Ignition Engines and Vessels 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: In the final rulemaking for 

new exhaust and evaporative emissions 

standards for nonroad spark-ignition 

engines, vessels, and equipment (73 FR 

59034, October 8, 2008), EPA 

established first-ever evaporative 

emissions standards for marine vessels. 

These requirements included portable 

marine fuel tanks commonly used in 

recreational boating. During their efforts 

to certify portable fuel tanks to these 

new requirements, manufacturers 

working together on systems integration 

identified several technical issues with 

the performance of the tanks/fuel 

systems in use that were not fully 

apparent to them before these standards 

were developed. Systems integration 

work conducted by the fuel tank, boat 

and engine manufacturers highlighted 

that under some circumstances there 

was the potential for fuel spillage to 

occur. Work conducted by these parties 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
56492 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 179 / Thursday, September 16, 2010 / Proposed Rules 

1American Boat and Yacht Council (ABYC), 

‘‘ABYC H–25: Portable Marine Gasoline Fuel 

Systems,’’ July, 2010. 

indicated that this issue applies to 

existing systems and tanks as well as 

those built to comply with EPA’s 

evaporative emission design standard. 

We have engaged the industry to 

identify a simple, safe, and emissions 

neutral solution to this concern. This 

proposed action represents the results of 

that work and is emissions neutral with 

respect to the diurnal emissions 

standard; however, to the extent that it 

helps reduce fuel spillage, incorporating 

safe recommended practices will result 

in a net benefit to the environment and 

lead to fuel savings. In the ‘‘Rules and 

Regulations’’ section of this Federal 

Register, we are making these technical 

amendments as a direct final rule 

without a prior proposed rule. If we 

receive no adverse comment, we will 

not take further action on this proposed 

rule. 

DATES: Written comments must be 

received by October 18, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– 

OAR–2010–0270, by mail to 

Environmental Protection Agency, Air 

Docket, Mail-code 6102T, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, 

DC 20460. Comments may also be 

submitted electronically or through 

hand delivery/courier by following the 

detailed instructions in the ADDRESSES

section of the direct final rule located in 

the rules section of this Federal 

Register. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael Samulski, Environmental 

Protection Agency, Office of 

Transportation and Air Quality, 

Assessment and Standards Division, 

2000 Traverwood Drive, Ann Arbor, 

Michigan 48105; telephone number: 

734–214–4532; fax number: 734–214– 

4050; email address: 

samulski.michael@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Why is EPA issuing this proposed 

rule? 

This document proposes to take 

action on Technical Amendments for 

Marine Spark-Ignition Engines and 

Vessels. We have published a direct 

final rule to modify existing designbased certification requirements to 

incorporate safe recommended 

practices, developed through industry 

consensus, for portable marine fuel 

tanks in the ‘‘Rules and Regulations’’ 

section of this Federal Register because 

we view this as a noncontroversial 

action and anticipate no adverse 

comment. We have explained our 

reasons for this action in the preamble 

to the direct final rule. 

If we receive no adverse comment, we 

will not take further action on this 

proposed rule. If we receive adverse 

comment, we will withdraw the direct 

final rule and it will not take effect. We 

would address all public comments in 

any subsequent final rule based on this 

proposed rule. 

We do not intend to institute a second 

comment period on this action. Any 

parties interested in commenting must 

do so at this time. For further 

information, please see the information 

provided in the ADDRESSES section of 

this document. 

II. Does this action apply to me? 

This action will affect companies that 

manufacture and certify portable marine 

fuel tanks for sale in the United States. 

The following table gives some 

examples of entities that may have to 

follow the regulations; however, since 

these are only examples, you should 

carefully examine the proposed 

regulations. You may direct questions 

regarding the applicability of this action 

as noted in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT. 

Category NAICS codesa SIC codesb Examples of potentially regulated 

entities 

Industry .............................................................................................. 333618 3519 Manufacturers of new engines. 

Industry .............................................................................................. 336612 3731, 3732 Manufacturers of marine vessels. 

a North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). 

bStandard Industrial Classification (SIC) system code. 

III. Summary of Rule 

In the final rulemaking for new 

exhaust and evaporative emissions 

standards for nonroad spark-ignition 

engines, vessels, and equipment (73 FR 

59034, October 8, 2008), EPA 

established first-ever evaporative 

emissions standards for marine vessels. 

These requirements included portable 

marine fuel tanks specifically designed 

for and commonly used in recreational 

boating, which are normally used to 

power gasoline outboard engines. 

During their efforts to certify portable 

fuel tanks to these new requirements, 

manufacturers working together on 

systems integration identified several 

technical issues with the performance of 

the tanks/fuel systems in use that were 

not fully apparent to them before these 

standards were developed. Systems 

integration work conducted by the fuel 

tank, boat and engine manufacturers 

highlighted that under some 

circumstances there was the potential 

for fuel spillage to occur. Work 

conducted by these parties indicated 

that this issue applies to existing fuel 

systems and tanks as well as those built 

to comply with EPA’s evaporative 

emission design standard. We have 

engaged the industry to identify a 

simple, safe, and emissions neutral 

solution to this concern. This action is 

emissions neutral with respect to the 

diurnal emissions standard; however, to 

the extent that it helps reduce fuel 

spillage, incorporating safe 

recommended practices will result in a 

net benefit to the environment and lead 

to fuel savings. 

EPA is proposing to make technical 

amendments to the design standard for 

portable tanks that will allow for this 

solution. Specifically, we are proposing 

to revise the text in § 1060.105(c)(1) to 

allow for an integrated or external 

manually activated device to be 

included in the fuel tank design to 

temporarily relieve pressure prior to 

fuel filling or connection to the engine. 

In addition, we are proposing to 

incorporate safe recommended 

practices, developed through industry 

consensus, for portable marine fuel 

tanks. Specifically, we are proposing to 

reference the ABYC H25 pressure relief 

method system testing and 

informational (e.g. labeling) provisions 

into our regulations.1

EPA does not expect that this action 

would have an adverse cost impact to 

the manufacturers beyond that 

envisioned in the original rule. This 

proposed rule would merely modify 

existing design-based certification 

requirements to incorporate safe 

recommended practices, developed 

through industry consensus, for portable 

marine fuel tanks. Adopting these 

amendments would lead to 

environmental, cost, and safety benefits 

through reduced fuel spillage. 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 179 / Thursday, September 16, 2010 / Proposed Rules 56493 

For additional discussion of the 

proposed rule changes, see the direct 

final rule EPA has published in the 

‘‘Rules and Regulations’’ section of 

today’s Federal Register. This proposal 

incorporates by reference all the 

reasoning, explanation, and regulatory 

text from the direct final rule. 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory 

Planning and Review 

This proposed rule is not a 

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under the 

terms of Executive Order (EO) 12866 (58 

FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and is 

therefore not subject to review under the 

EO. This proposed rule merely modifies 

existing design-based certification 

requirements to incorporate safe 

recommended practices, developed 

through industry consensus, for portable 

marine fuel tanks. There are no costs 

with this proposed rule beyond those 

envisioned in the original rule. 

B. Paperwork Reduction Act 

This action does not impose an 

information collection burden under the 

provisions of the Paperwork Reduction 

Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. Burden is 

defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b). This 

proposed rule does not include any new 

collection requirements, as it would 

simply modify existing design-based 

certification requirements to incorporate 

safe recommended practices, developed 

through industry consensus, for portable 

marine fuel tanks. There are no new 

paperwork requirements associated with 

this proposed rule. 

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act 

The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) 

generally requires an agency to prepare 

a regulatory flexibility analysis of any 

rule subject to notice and comment 

rulemaking requirements under the 

Administrative Procedure Act or any 

other statute unless the agency certifies 

that the rule will not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities. Small entities 

include small businesses, small 

organizations, and small governmental 

jurisdictions. 

For purposes of assessing the impacts 

of today’s proposed rule on small 

entities, small entity is defined as: (1) A 

small as defined by the Small Business 

Administration’s (SBA) regulations at 13 

CFR 121.201; (2) a small governmental 

jurisdiction that is a government of a 

city, county, town, school district or 

special district with a population of less 

than 50,000; and (3) a small 

organization that is any not-for-profit 

enterprise which is independently 

owned and operated and is not 

dominant in its field. 

After considering the economic 

impacts of today’s proposed rule on 

small entities, EPA has concluded that 

this proposed rule would not have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. In 

determining whether a rule has a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities, the 

impact of concern is any significant 

adverse economic impact on small 

entities, since the primary purpose of 

the regulatory flexibility analyses is to 

identify and address regulatory 

alternatives ‘‘which minimize any 

significant economic impact of the rule 

on small entities.’’ 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604. 

Thus, an agency may certify that a rule 

will not have a significant economic 

impact on a substantial number of small 

entities if the rule relieves regulatory 

burden, or otherwise has a positive 

economic effect on all of the small 

entities subject to the rule. 

This proposed rule would merely 

modify existing design-based 

certification requirements to incorporate 

safe recommended practices, developed 

through industry consensus, for portable 

marine fuel tanks. We have therefore 

concluded that today’s final rule will 

not increase regulatory burden for 

affected small entities. 

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

This action contains no Federal 

mandates under the provisions of Title 

II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform 

Act of 1995 (UMRA), 2 U.S.C. 1531– 

1538 for State, local, or tribal 

governments or the private sector. The 

action imposes no enforceable duty on 

any State, local or tribal governments or 

the private sector. Therefore, this action 

is not subject to the requirements of 

sections 202 or 205 of the UMRA. 

This action is also not subject to the 

requirements of section 203 of UMRA 

because it contains no regulatory 

requirements that might significantly or 

uniquely affect small governments. This 

proposed rule would merely modify 

existing design-based certification 

requirements to incorporate safe 

recommended practices, developed 

through industry consensus, for portable 

marine fuel tanks. 

E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism 

This proposed rule does not have 

federalism implications. It would not 

have substantial direct effects on the 

States, on the relationship between the 

national government and the States, or 

on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government, as specified in 

Executive Order 13132. This proposed 

rule would merely modify existing 

design-based certification requirements 

to incorporate safe recommended 

practices, developed through industry 

consensus, for portable marine fuel 

tanks. Thus, Executive Order 13132 

does not apply to this action. 

F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation 

and Coordination With Indian Tribal 

Governments 

This action does not have tribal 

implications, as specified in Executive 

Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 

2000). This proposed rule would merely 

modify existing design-based 

certification requirements to incorporate 

safe recommended practices, developed 

through industry consensus, for portable 

marine fuel tanks. Thus, Executive 

Order 13175 does not apply to this 

action. 

G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of 

Children From Environmental Health 

and Safety Risks 

This action is not subject to EO 13045 

(62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) because 

it is not economically significant as 

defined in EO 12866, and because the 

Agency does not believe the 

environmental health or safety risks 

addressed by this action present a 

disproportionate risk to children. This 

proposed rule would merely modify 

existing design-based certification 

requirements to incorporate safe 

recommended practices, developed 

through industry consensus, for portable 

marine fuel tanks. 

H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use 

This action is not subject to Executive 

Order 13211 (66 FR 28355 (May 22, 

2001)), because it is not a significant 

regulatory action under Executive Order 

12866. 

I. National Technology Transfer 

Advancement Act 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (‘‘NTTAA’’), Public Law 

104–113, 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note) 

directs EPA to use voluntary consensus 

standards in its regulatory activities 

unless to do so would be inconsistent 

with applicable law or otherwise 

impractical. Voluntary consensus 

standards are technical standards (e.g., 

materials specifications, test methods, 

sampling procedures, and business 

practices) that are developed or adopted 

by voluntary consensus standards 

bodies. NTTAA directs EPA to provide 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
56494 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 179 / Thursday, September 16, 2010 / Proposed Rules 

Congress, through OMB, explanations 

when the Agency decides not to use 

available and applicable voluntary 

consensus standards. 

This proposed rulemaking involves 

technical standards. This proposed rule 

would modify existing design-based 

certification requirements to incorporate 

safe recommended practices, developed 

through industry consensus, for portable 

marine fuel tanks. Specifically, it 

incorporates by reference ABYC H–25, 

‘‘Portable Marine Gasoline Fuel 

Systems,’’ July, 2010. Anyone may 

purchase copies of these materials from 

the American Boat and Yacht Council, 

613 Third Street, Suite 10 Annapolis, 

MD 21403 or http://www.abycinc.org/. 

J. Executive Order 12898: Federal 

Actions to Address Environmental 

Justice in Minority Populations and 

Low-Income Populations 

Executive Order (EO) 12898 (59 FR 

7629 (Feb. 16, 1994)) establishes federal 

executive policy on environmental 

justice. Its main provision directs 

federal agencies, to the greatest extent 

practicable and permitted by law, to 

make environmental justice part of their 

mission by identifying and addressing, 

as appropriate, disproportionately high 

and adverse human health or 

environmental effects of their programs, 

policies, and activities on minority 

populations and low-income 

populations in the United States. 

EPA has determined that this 

proposed rule would not have 

disproportionately high and adverse 

human health or environmental effects 

on minority or low-income populations 

because it increases the level of 

environmental protection for all affected 

populations without having any 

disproportionately high and adverse 

human health or environmental effects 

on any population, including any 

minority or low-income population. 

This proposed rule would merely 

modify existing design-based 

certification requirements to incorporate 

safe recommended practices, developed 

through industry consensus, for portable 

marine fuel tanks. 

K. Statutory Authority 

The statutory authority for this action 

comes from section 213 of the Clean Air 

Act as amended (42 U.S.C. 7547). This 

action is a rulemaking subject to the 

provisions of Clean Air Act section 

307(d). See 42 U.S.C. 7607(d). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 1060 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Marine spark-ignition engines 

and vessels. 

Dated: September 9, 2010. 

Lisa P. Jackson, 

Administrator. 

[FR Doc. 2010–23127 Filed 9–15–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 54 

[WC Docket No. 05–337, CC Docket No. 

96–45; FCC 10–155] 

High-Cost Universal Service Support 

and Federal-State Joint Board on 

Universal Service 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. 

SUMMARY: In this document, the Federal 

Communications Commission 

(Commission) undertakes important 

steps for fiscally responsible universal 

service fund reform. The Commission 

seeks comment on permanently 

amending our rules to facilitate efficient 

use of reclaimed excess high-cost 

support. In addition, the Commission 

seeks comment on a proposal to modify 

our rules to reclaim legacy support 

surrendered by a competitive ETC when 

it relinquishes ETC status in a particular 

state. 

DATES: Comments on the proposed rules 

are due on or before October 7, 2010 and 

reply comments are due on or before 

October 21, 2010. If you anticipate that 

you will be submitting comments, but 

find it difficult to do so within the 

period of time allowed by this notice, 

you should advise the contact listed 

below as soon as possible. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, 

identified by WC Docket No. 05–337 

and CC Docket No. 96–45, by any of the 

following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Federal Communications 

Commission’s Web Site: http://fjallfoss.

fcc.gov/ecfs2/. Follow the instructions 

for submitting comments. 

• People with Disabilities: Contact the 

FCC to request reasonable 

accommodations (accessible format 

documents, sign language interpreters, 

CART, etc.) by e-mail: FCC504@fcc.gov 

or phone: (202) 418–0530 or TTY: (202) 

418–0432. 

For detailed instructions for submitting 

comments and additional information 

on the rulemaking process, see the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of 

this document. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ted 

Burmeister, Wireline Competition 

Bureau, Telecommunications Access 

Policy Division, (202) 418–7389 or TTY: 

(202) 418–0484. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a 

synopsis of the Commission’s Notice of 

Proposed Rulemaking in WC Docket No. 

05–337, CC Docket No. 96–45, FCC 

10–155, adopted August 31, 2010, and 

released September 3, 2010. This NPRM 

was also released with a companion 

Final Rule document that is published 

elsewhere in this Federal Register issue. 

The complete text of this document is 

available for inspection and copying 

during normal business hours in the 

FCC Reference Information Center, 

Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room 

CY–A257, Washington, DC 20554. The 

document may also be purchased from 

the Commission’s duplicating 

contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 

445 12th Street, SW., Room CY–B402, 

Washington, DC 20554, telephone (800) 

378–3160 or (202) 863–2893, facsimile 

(202) 863–2898, or via the Internet at 

http://www.bcpiweb.com. It is also 

available on the Commission’s Web site 

at http://www.fcc.gov. 

Pursuant to §§ 1.415 and 1.419 of the 

Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 1.415, 

1.419, interested parties may file 

comments and reply comments on or 

before the dates indicated on the first 

page of this document. Comments may 

be filed using: (1) The Commission’s 

Electronic Comment Filing System 

(ECFS), (2) the Federal Government’s 

eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing 

paper copies. See Electronic Filing of 

Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 

63 FR 24121, May 1, 1998. 

• Electronic Filers: Comments may be 

filed electronically using the Internet by 

accessing the ECFS: http://www.fcc.gov/ 

cgb/ecfs/ or the Federal eRulemaking 

Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 

Filers should follow the instructions 

provided on the website for submitting 

comments. 

• Paper Filers: Parties who choose to 

file by paper must file an original and 

four copies of each filing. If more than 

one docket or rulemaking number 

appears in the caption of this 

proceeding, filers must submit two 

additional copies for each additional 

docket or rulemaking number. 

Filings can be sent by hand or 

messenger delivery, by commercial 

overnight courier, or by first-class or 

overnight U.S. Postal Service mail 

(although we continue to experience 

delays in receiving U.S. Postal Service 

mail). All filings must be addressed to 

the Commission’s Secretary, Office of 

the Secretary, Federal Communications 

Commission. 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1