alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A)
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE
25, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) FORM 10-Q FOR
THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 25, 2000.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-27-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-25-2000
<CASH>                                           2,562
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,223
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,342
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                61,202
<PP&E>                                         196,406
<DEPRECIATION>                                (63,620)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 274,789
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           98,670
<BONDS>                                        236,693
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,804
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (72,975)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   274,789
<SALES>                                        270,969
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               270,969
<CGS>                                           70,354
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  267,132
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,149
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (13,312)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       254
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (13,566)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (13,566)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.08)


</TABLE>
§ 58.29 Personnel. ( a ) Each individual engaged in the conduct of or responsible for the supervision of a nonclinical laboratory study shall have education, training, and experience, or combination thereof, to enable that individual to perform the assigned functions.
( b ) Each testing facility shall maintain a current summary of training and experience and job description for each individual engaged in or supervising the conduct of a nonclinical laboratory study.
( c ) There shall be a sufficient number of personnel for the timely and proper conduct of the study according to the protocol.
( d ) Personnel shall take necessary personal sanitation and health precautions designed to avoid contamination of test and control articles and test systems.
( e ) Personnel engaged in a nonclinical laboratory study shall wear clothing appropriate for the duties they perform. Such clothing shall be changed as often as necessary to prevent microbiological, radiological, or chemical contamination of test systems and test and control articles.
( f ) Any individual found at any time to have an illness that may adversely affect the quality and integrity of the nonclinical laboratory study shall be excluded from direct contact with test systems, test and control articles and any other operation or function that may adversely affect the study until the condition is corrected. All personnel shall be instructed to report to their immediate supervisors any health or medical conditions that may reasonably be considered to have an adverse effect on a nonclinical laboratory study.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. In connection with the Quarterly Report of Front Range Capital Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
William A. Mitchell, Jr. Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. /s/ William A. Mitchell, Jr.William A. Mitchell, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Front Range Capital Corporation and will be retained by Front Range
Capital Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT
      32.1











CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Tonga Capital Corporation (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"). I, Barent
      W. Cater, President and Chief Executive Officer of the company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and
      belief.





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/
      Barent W.
      Cater


Barent
      W.
      Cater, President and Chief Executive Officer


Dated:
      May 15, 2007
38925.

#### MOORE v. THE STATE.

Decided June 30, 1961.

*94*Holcomb ■& McDuff, Frank D. Holcomb, Grubbs & Prosser,*for plaintiff in error.

*Luther C. Hames, Solicitor-General, Ben F. Smith, Assistant Solicitor-General,*contra.

Jordan, Judge.

The undisputed evidence in this case disclosed that the defendant entered into a contract with A. D. Campbell to construct a residence for Campbell; that he received from Campbell the sum of $15,988.90 to be used for the payment of labor and materials in the construction of the house in question, prior to his abandonment of construction; and that certain materialmen’s liens were recorded against the property as a result of purchases made by Moore prior to the abandonment of construction in the amount of $3,814.03, which were later satisfied by Campbell. Campbell testified that in his best judgment a sum in excess of $5,000 was paid the defendant which was not used for the payment of costs incurred in the construction by the defendant. There was also introduced in evidence by the State a financial statement prepared by the defendant’s attorney which showed the receipt of $15,988.90 by the defendant from Campbell and an itemized disbursement of $11,601.16, leaving a balance of $4,337.74 of the amount received which was not accounted for.

Under the rulings of the Supreme Court in *Johnson v. State,*203 Ga. 147 (45 SE2d 616), and of this court in Ramer *v. State,*76 Ga. App. 678 (47 SE2d 174), and *Allison v. State,*84 Ga. App. 77 (65 SE2d 642), when these facts' appeared, the burden of proof shifted to the defendant to account for the funds which he had received from the prosecutor, by showing that the entire sum was used for the payment of labor and material. While the defendant in his unsworn statement denied a statement, attributed to him by the prosecutor, to the effect that he had used these funds in the construction of another house, he did not deny that he had used the funds for purposes other than to pay for labor and material incurred in the construction of the house in question, and he in no wise attempted to account for the funds which he had received for these purposes.

*95Under these circumstances, the verdict rendered was demanded by the evidence; and the trial court did not err, accordingly, in denying the defendant’s amended motion for a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Townsend, P. J., and Frankum, J., concur.*
EXHIBIT 32
----------




                             CERTIFICATIONS OF
            CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                    PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                        SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
            ---------------------------------------------------



     The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be
deemed filed pursuant to any provision of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 or any other securities law:

     Each of the undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on
Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of ARVIDA/JMB PARTNERS, L.P.




                                          /s/   Gary Nickele
                                          ------------------------------
                                          Gary Nickele
                                          Chief Executive Officer




                                          /s/   Gailen J. Hull
                                          ------------------------------
                                          Gailen J. Hull
                                          Chief Financial Officer and
                                          Principal Accounting Officer
EXHIBIT 10.51

                              Note to Exhibit 10.51



         The following Trust Agreement is substantially identical in all
material respects to five additional Trust Agreements except as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Owner Participant                                       Date                                    Aircraft (Tail No.)
-----------------                                       ----
<S>                                                     <C>                                     <C>
NCC Charlie Company*                                    September 10, 1998*                     N575ML*
NCC Charlie Company                                     September 10, 1998                      N576ML
General Electric Capital Corporation                    November 10, 1998                       N577ML
General Electric Capital Corporation                    November 10, 1998                       N578ML
Castle Harbour Leasing Inc.                             December 10, 1998                       N579ML
NCC Charlie Company                                     January 25, 1999                        N580ML
</TABLE>




------------------

*   Filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
    quarter ended September 30, 1998.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

No. 97-7409

HECTOR SANTOYO LEONES, a/k/a

Victor Flores, a/k/a Bic, a/k/a The

Mexican,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.

W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge.

(CR-91-52-BR, CA-97-331-5-BR)

Submitted: July 30, 1998

Decided: August 19, 1998

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

Hector Santoyo Leones, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver,

Assistant United States Attorney, Bruce Charles Johnson, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina,

for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his

motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

Appellant's conviction became final in 1992. On April 23, 1997,

Appellant filed his § 2255 motion. The district court denied relief

because Appellant filed his motion outside the one-year limitation

period imposed by § 2255. Pursuant to our recent decision in Brown

v. Angelone, ___ F.3d ___, Nos. 96-7173, 96-7208, 1998 WL 389030

(4th Cir. July 14, 1998), Appellant had until April 23, 1997, to file

a timely motion. Appellant's § 2255 motion is therefore timely.

Accordingly, we grant a certificate of appealability on this issue,

vacate the district court's order, and remand this case for consideration on the merits. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

VACATED AND REMANDED

 2
§ 58.47 Facilities for handling test and control articles. ( a ) As necessary to prevent contamination or mixups, there shall be separate areas for: ( 1 ) Receipt and storage of the test and control articles.
( 2 ) Mixing of the test and control articles with a carrier, e.g., feed.
( 3 ) Storage of the test and control article mixtures.
( b ) Storage areas for the test and/or control article and test and control mixtures shall be separate from areas housing the test systems and shall be adequate to preserve the identity, strength, purity, and stability of the articles and mixtures.
Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18
                            of the United States Code

      I, Thomas M. O'Flynn, Chief Financial Officer of PSEG Energy Holdings Inc.
(the  "Company"),  to the best of my  knowledge,  certify that (i) the Quarterly
Report of the  Company on Form 10-Q for the  Quarter  ended  June 30,  2002 (the
"Periodic  Report")  fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information  contained
in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                        /s/ Thomas M. O'Flynn
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Thomas M. O'Flynn
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        August 2, 2002
§ 522.2260 Sulfamethazine. ( a ) *Specifications.* Each milliliter (mL) of solution contains 250 milligrams (mg) sulfamethazine sodium.
( b ) *Sponsor.* See No. 016592 in § 510.600(c) of this chapter.
( c ) *Related tolerances.* See § 556.670 of this chapter.
( d ) *Conditions of use in cattle* — ( 1 ) *Amount.* Initially administer 20 mL for each 50 pounds (lb) of body weight (100 mg/lb) by intravenous injection, followed by 20 mL per 100 lb of body weight (50 mg/lb) by intravenous injection, daily thereafter. Treatment should not exceed a total of 5 consecutive days.
( 2 ) *Indications for use.* For cattle for treatment of bacterial pneumonia and bovine respiratory disease complex (shipping fever complex) (*Pasteurella* spp.), colibacillosis (bacterial scours) (*Escherichia coli*), necrotic pododermatitis (foot rot) (*Fusobacterium necrophorum*), calf diphtheria (*Fusobacterium necrophorum*), acute mastitis and acute metritis (*Streptococcus* spp.) when caused by one or more pathogenic organisms sensitive to sulfamethazine.
( 3 ) *Limitations.* Withdraw medication from cattle 10 days prior to slaughter. Do not use in female dairy cattle 20 months of age or older. Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian.
[46 FR 62055, Dec. 22, 1981, as amended at 67 FR 78355, Dec. 24, 2002; 75 FR 10167, Mar. 5, 2010; 76 FR 53051, Aug. 25, 2011; 81 FR 17608, Mar. 30, 2016]
#### Charles Gustav Teach, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. H. *&*H. Tank Installers, Inc., a Corporation, and Jack Harrington, Defendants-Appellants.

Gen. No. 53,543. (Abstract of Decision.)

First District, Third Division.

May 1, 1969.

Wildman, Harrold, Allen & Dixon, of Chicago, for appellants;

Howard and Decker, of Chicago (David A. Decker, of counsel), for appellee.

Opinion by

JUSTICE SCHWARTZ.

Not to be published in full.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-10694

Conference Calendar

 

RAYMOND KING,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS

DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 

INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; JOHN DOES, 

Officer; JANE DOES, Officer; TEXAS

DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,

INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:97-CV-390-C

--------------------

August 24, 2000

Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Raymond King, Texas prisoner No. 636040, appeals the

district court’s dismissal of his civil rights complaint and

moves this court for a protective order. The motion for a

protective order is DENIED. King’s complaint challenges the

defendants’ interpretation of the Texas Department of Criminal

Justice (TDCJ) regulations concerning inmates’ receipt of
No. 99-10694

-2-

sexually explicit materials. He alleges that his Equal

Protection rights have been violated because the TDCJ “approved

publication list” includes magazines featuring lesbian activity,

but it omits other magazines specializing in minority lesbian

subjects. King cannot establish an equal protection violation

because he does not suggest that he has been treated differently

from any other TDCJ prisoner. Thompson v. Patteson, 985 F.2d

202, 207 (5th Cir. 1993). At best, he has alleged only

inconsistent censorship, which is insufficient to support an

equal protection violation. Id.

AFFIRMED; MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER DENIED.
# C_2019235EN.01000101.xml

| 12.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/1

---

COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION

of 9 July 2019

on the appointment of the President of the European Central Bank

(2019/C 235/01)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 283(2) and 139(2) thereof,

Having regard to Protocol No 4 on the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and in particular Article 11.2 thereof,

HEREBY RECOMMENDS TO THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL THAT:

Ms Christine LAGARDE be appointed as President of the European Central Bank for a term of office of eight years with effect from 1 November 2019.

Done at Brussels, 9 July 2019.

For the Council

The President

M. LINTILÄ

---
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.2

          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael S. Delin, the Chief Financial Officer of Central Wireless Inc. (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)      the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal
         quarter ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Dated: November 14, 2002

                                              /s/ Michael S. Delin
                                              ------------------------------
                                              Name: Michael S. Delin
                                              Title: Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Central Wireless, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in
      the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant
      to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


Date:
                January 23, 2007
            By:
            /s/*Kenneth
              W. Brand*Kenneth
                W. Brand
              Acting
                Principal Financial Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Central Wireless, Inc. and will be retained
      by Central Wireless, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 10.1





February 4, 1999


Thermo Power Corporation
45 First Avenue
Waltham, MA 02454


RE:  $160,000,000 Promissory Note due November 1999


Thermo Electron hereby confirms its commitment to refinance the above referenced
note upon its maturity on November 16, 1999, under the following terms and
conditions:


Amount:         Up to but not exceeding $160,000,000.00 USD

Maturity:       October 30, 2008

Interest Rate:  7.625% per annum payable semi-annually in arrears each April
                30th and October 30th, assuming a 360-day year consisting of
                twelve 30-day months.

Prepayment:          Note can be prepaid in full or in part at any time
without penalty


You must notify Thermo Electron Corporation (attn: Treasurer) no later than
October 15, 1999 if you intend to accept this refinancing option, and the amount
required. This refinancing will only be available once all amounts due and owing
to Thermo Electron Corporation under the existing promissory note have been
satisfied.



Thermo Electron Corporation


/s/ Kenneth J. Apicerno

By:   Kenneth J. Apicerno
Title:     Treasurer