Redline of Subpart F and Subpart LLL due to Proposed Amendments 2014

PA 1 RT 60

– [AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for part 60 continues to read as

follows:

Authority: 23 U.S.C. 101; 42 U.S.C. 7401

- 7671q.

Subpart F

-- [AMENDED]

§60.60 Applicability and designation of affected facility.

(a) The provisions of this subpart are applicable to the following affected facilities in portland cement plants: Kiln, clinker cooler, raw mill system, finish mill system, raw mill dryer, raw material storage, clinker storage, finished product storage, conveyor t ransfer points, bagging and bulk loading and unloading systems.

(b) Any facility under paragraph (a) of this section that commences construction or modification after August 17, 1971, is subject to the requirements of this subpart.

§60.61 Definitions.

As used in this subpart, all terms not defined herein shall have the meaning given them in the Act and in subpart A of this part.

(a) Portland cement plant means any facility manufacturing portland cement by either the wet or dry process.

(b) Bypass mea ns any system that prevents all or a portion of the kiln or clinker cooler exhaust gases from entering the main control device and ducts the gases through a separate control device. This does not include emergency systems designed to duct exhaust gases dir ectly to the atmosphere in the event of a malfunction of any control device controlling kiln or clinker cooler emissions.

(c) Bypass stack means the stack that vents exhaust gases to the atmosphere from the bypass control device.

(d) Monovent means an ex haust configuration of a building or emission control device (e.g., positive

- pressure fabric filter) Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt, Check spelling and grammar

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted: (1) ¶Page 2 of 106

that extends the length of the structure and has a width very small in relation to its length (i.e., length to width ratio is typically greater than 5:1). The exhaust may be an open vent with or without a roof, louvered vents, or a combination of such
features.

(e) Excess emissions means, with respect to this subpart, results of any required measurements outside the applicable range (e.g., emissions limitati ons, parametric operating limits) that is permitted by this subpart. The values of measurements will be in the same units and averaging time as the values specified in this subpart for the limitations.

(f) Operating day means a 24

- hour period beginning at 12:00 midnight during which the kiln produces clinker at any time. For calculating Rolling Average emissions, an operating day does not include the hours of operation during startup or shutdown.

(g) Rolling average means the w eighted average of all data, meeting QA/QC requirements or otherwise normalized, collected during the applicable averaging period. The period of a rolling average stipulates the frequency of data averaging and reporting

. To demonstrate compliance with an o perating parameter

a 30

- day rolling average period requires calculation of a new average value each operating day and shall include the average of all the hourly averages of the specific operating parameter

. For demonstration of compliance with an emission s limit based on pollutant concentration a 30

- day rolling average is comprised of the average of all the hourly average concentrations over the previous 30 operating days

. For demonstration of compliance with an emissions limit based on lbs

- pollutant per p roduction unit
the 30

- day rolling average is calculated by summing the hourly mass emissions over the previous 30 operating days, then dividing that sum by the total production during the same period.

(h) Run average means the average of the recorded parameter
values for a run.

§60.62 Standards.

(a) On and after the date on which the performance test required to be conducted by §60.8 is completed, you may not discharge into the atmosphere from any kiln any gases which:

(1) Contain particulate matter (PM) in excess of: Deleted: operates

Deleted: rolling 30

- day average

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Indent: First line: 0.33", Don't add space between paragraphs of the same style, Line spacing: single

Deleted: (g) Rolling average means the weighted average of all data, meeting QA/QC requirements or otherwise normalized, collected during the applicable averaging period. The period of a rolling average stipulates the frequency of data averaging and reporting . A thirty

- day rolling average period requires calculation of a new average
value each operating day and shall include either the arithmetic average of all the hourly averages of the specific operating parameter; or the arithmetic average of all the hourly average concentrations over the previous thirty operating days; or the total of the hourly mass emissions over the previous thirty operating days divided by the total production during the se same period s

. ¶

Formatted: Strikethrough

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted: ¶

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 ptPage 3 of 106

(i) 0.30 pounds per ton of feed (dry ba sis) to the kiln for kilns constructed, reconstructed, or modified after August 17, 1971 but on or before June 16, 2008.

(ii) 0.02 pound per ton of clinker if construction or reconstruction of the kiln commenced after June 16, 2008.

(iii) Kilns that have u ndergone a modification after June 16, 2008 may not discharge into the atmosphere any gases which contain PM in excess of 0.07 pound per ton of clinker.

(2) Exhibit greater than 20 percent opacity for kilns constructed, reconstructed, or modified after Aug ust 17, 1971 but on or before June 16, 2008, except that this opacity limit does not apply to any kiln subject to a PM limit in paragraph (a)(1) of this section that uses a PM continuous parametric monitoring system (CPMS).

(3) Exceed 1.50 pounds of nitro gen oxide (NO X ) per ton of clinker on a 30

- operating day rolling average if construction, reconstruction, or modification of the kiln commences after June 16, 2008, except this limit does not apply to any alkali bypass installed on the kiln. An operating d ay includes all valid data obtained in any daily 24

- hour period during which the kiln operates and excludes any measurements made during the daily 24

- hour period when the kiln was not operating.

(4) Exceed 0.4 pounds of sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) per ton of clin ker on a 30

- operating day rolling average if construction, reconstruction, or modification commences after June 16, 2008, unless you are demonstrating a 90 percent SO 2 emissions reduction
measured across the SO 2 control device. An operating day includes
al l valid data obtained in any daily 24

- hour period during which the kiln operates, and excludes any measurements made during the daily 24

- hour period when the kiln was not operating.

(b) On and after the date on which the performance test required to be con ducted by §60.8 is completed, you may not discharge into the atmosphere from any clinker cooler any gases which:

(1) Contain PM in excess of:

(i) 0.02 pound per ton of clinker if construction or reconstruction of the clinker cooler commences after June 16,
2008. Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt, Font color: Red

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt, Font color: Red
Commented [NS1]: Reserved removed

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt, Font color: Red

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 ptPage 4 of 106

(ii) 0.07 pound per ton of clinker if the clinker cooler has undergone a modification.

(iii) ) 0.10 lb per ton of feed (dry basis) for clinker coolers constructed, reconstructed, or modified after August 17, 1971 but on or before June 16, 2008.

(iv) 10 percent opacity for clinker coolers constructed, reconstructed, or modified after August 17, 1971 but on or before June 16, 2008 , except that this opacity limit does not apply to any clinker cooler subje ct to a PM limit in paragraph (b )(1) of this sect ion that uses a PM continuous parametric monitoring system (CPMS).

(2) If the kiln and clinker cooler exhaust are combined for energy efficiency purposes and sent to a single control device, the appropriate kiln PM limit may be adjusted using the procedu res in §63.1343(b) of this chapter.

(3) If the kiln has a separated alkali bypass stack and/or an inline coal mill with a separate stack, you must combine the PM emissions from the bypass stack and/or the inline coal mill
stack with the PM emissions from t he main kiln exhaust to determine total PM emissions.

(c) On and after the date on which the performance test required to be conducted by §60.8 is completed, you may not discharge into the atmosphere from any affected facility other than the kiln and clink er cooler any gases which exhibit 10 percent opacity, or greater.

(d) If you have an affected source subject to this subpart with a different emissions limit or requirement for the same pollutant under another regulation in title 40 of this chapter,

once y ou are in compliance with the most stringent emissions limit or requirement, you are not subject to the less stringent requirement. Until you are in compliance with the more stringent limit, the less stringent limit continues to apply.

(e) The compliance date for all revised monitoring and recordkeepi ng requirements contained in this rule will be the same as listed in 63 .1351(c) unless you commenced construction as of June 16, 2008, at which time the complia nce date is November 8, 2010 or upon startup, whichever is later. Deleted:

.

Deleted: If you have an affe cted source subject to this subpart with a different emissions limit or requirement for the same pollutant under another regulation in title 40 of this chapter, you must comply with the most stringent emissions limit or requirement and are not subject to t he less stringent requirement.Page 5 of 106

§60.63 Monitoring of operations.

(a) Reserved.

(b) Clinker production monitoring requirements. For any kiln subject to an emissions limitation on PM, NO X , or SO 2 emissions (lb/ton of clinker ), you must:

(1) Determine hourly clinker production by one of two
methods:

(i) Install, calibrate, maintain, and operate a permanent weigh scale system to measure and record weight rates of the amount of clinker produced in tons of mass per hour. The syst em of measuring hourly clinker production must be maintained within ±5 percent accuracy or

(ii) Install, calibrate, maintain, and operate a permanent weigh scale system to measure and record weight rates of the amount of feed to the kiln in tons of mass pe r hour. The system of measuring feed must be maintained within ±5 percent accuracy. Calculate your hourly clinker production rate using a kiln specific feed

- to

- clinker ratio based on reconciled clinker production rates determined for accounting purposes an d recorded feed rates. This ratio should be updated monthly. Note that if this ratio changes at clinker reconciliation, you must use the new ratio going forward, but you do not have to retroactively change clinker production rates previously estimated.

(ii i) For each kiln operating hour for which you do not have data on clinker production or the amount of feed to the kiln, use the value from the most recent previous hour for which valid data are available.

(2) Determine, record, and maintain a record of the accuracy of the system of measuring hourly clinker production rates or feed rates before initial use (for new sources) or by the effective compliance date of this rule (for existing sources). During each quarter of source operation, you must determine,

re cord, and maintain a record of the ongoing accuracy of the system of measuring hourly clinker production rates or feed

rates.

(3) If you measure clinker production directly, record the daily clinker production rates; if you measure the kiln feed
rates and calculate clinker production, record the daily kiln feed and clinker production rates.Page 6 of 106

(c) PM Emissions Monitoring Requirements. (1) For each kiln or clinker cooler subject to a PM emissions limit in §60.62(a) ( 1 ) (ii) , 60.62(a) ( 1 ) (iii ), or 60.62(b)(1 )(i) and 60.62(b)(1)(ii), you must demonstrate compliance through an initial performance test

. You will conduct your performance test using Method 5 or Method 5I at appendix A

- 3 to part 60 of this chapt er. You must also monitor continuous performance through
use of a PM CPMS.

(2) For your PM CPMS, you will establish a site

- specific operating limit. If your PM performance test demonstrates your PM emission levels to be below 75 percent of your emission li mit you will use the average PM CPMS value recorded during the PM compliance test, the milliamp equivalent of zero output from your PM CPMS, and the average PM result of your compliance test to establish your operating limit equivalent to 75 percent of
the standard. If your PM compliance test demonstrates your PM emission levels to be at or above 75 percent of your emission limit you will use the average PM CPMS value recorded during the PM compliance test demonstrating compliance with the PM limit to
estab lish your operating limit. You will use the PM CPMS to demonstrate continuous compliance with your operating limit. You must repeat the performance test annually and reassess and adjust the site

- specific operating limit in accordance with the
results of th e performance test.

(i) Your PM CPMS must provide a 4

- 20 milliamp or digital signal output and the establishment of its relationship to manual reference method measurements must be determined in units of milliamps or the monitors digital equivalent.

(ii) Your PM CPMS operating range must be capable of reading PM concentrations from zero to a level equivalent to two times your allowable emission limit. If your PM CPMS is an auto

ranging instrument capable of multiple scales, the primary range of the instrum ent must be capable of reading PM concentration from zero to a level equivalent to two times your allowable emission limit.

(iii) During the initial performance test or any such subsequent performance test that demonstrates compliance with the PM limit, re cord and average all milliamp or digital output values from the PM CPMS for the periods corresponding to the compliance test runs (e.g., average all your PM CPMS output values for three corresponding 2

- hour Method 5I test runs). Deleted: and

Deleted: ),

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt Deleted:

,

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted: and 60.62(b)(1)(iii),

Deleted: as required by Section 60.8.

Deleted:

.Page 7 of 106

(3) Determine your operatin g limit as specified in paragraphs (c)(4)(i) through (c)(5) of this section. If your PM performance test demonstrates your PM emission levels to be below 75 percent of your emission limit you will use the average PM CPMS value recorded during the PM compli ance test, the milliamp or digital equivalent of zero output from your PM CPMS, and the average PM result of your compliance test to establish your operating limit. If your PM compliance test demonstrates your PM emission levels to be at or above 75 percen t of your emission limit you will use the average PM CPMS value recorded during the PM compliance test to establish your operating limit. You must verify an existing or establish a new operating limit after each repeated performance test. You must repeat t he performance test at least annually and reassess and adjust the site

- specific operating limit in accordance with the results of the performance test.

(4) If the average of your three Method 5 or 5I compliance test runs are below 75 percent of your PM emi ssion limit, you must calculate an operating limit by establishing a relationship of PM CPMS signal to PM concentration using the PM CPMS instrument zero, the average PM CPMS values corresponding to the three compliance test runs, and the average PM concen tration from the Method 5 or 5I compliance test with the procedures in (c)(4)(i)(A) through (D) of this section.

(i) Determine your PM CPMS instrument zero output with one of the following procedures.

(A) Zero point data for in

- situ instruments should be

o btained by removing the instrument from the stack and monitoring ambient air on a test bench.

(B) Zero point data for extractive instruments should be obtained by removing the extractive probe from the stack and drawing in clean ambient air.

(C) The zero p oint can also can be obtained by performing manual reference method measurements when the flue gas is free of PM emissions or contains very low PM concentrations (e.g., when your process is not operating, but the fans are operating or your source is combus ting only natural gas) and plotting these with the compliance data to find the zero intercept.

(D) If none of the steps in paragraphs (c)(4)(i)(A) through (C) of this section are possible, you must use a zero output value provided by the manufacturer.Page 8 of 106

(ii) Determine your PM CPMS instrument average in milliamps or digital signal , and the average of your corresponding three PM compliance test runs, using equation 1.

Where:

X 1 = The PM CPMS data points for the three runs constituting the performance test,

Y 1 = The PM concentration value for the three runs constituting

the performance test, and

n = The number of data points.

(iii) With your PM CPMS instrument zero expressed in milliamps or a digital signal value , your three run average PM CPMS milliamp or digi tal signal value, and your three run average PM concentration from your three PM performance test runs, determine a relationship of lb/ton

- clinker per milliamp with equation 2.

Where:

R = The relative lb/ton clinker per milliamp for your PM CPMS.

Y 1 = Th e three run average PM lb/ton clinker.

X 1 = The three run average milliamp or digital signal output from

you PM CPMS.

z = the milliamp or digital equivalent of your instrument zero determined from (c)(4)(i) of this section.

(iv) Determine your source speci fic 30

- day rolling average operating limit using the lb/ton

- clinker per milliamp or digital signal value from Equation 2 above in Equation 3, below. This sets your operating limit at the PM CPMS output value corresponding to 75 percent of your emission lim it.

Where: Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt, Subscript

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt, Subscript

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt, Subscript

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt, Subscript

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 ptPage 9 of 106

O l = The operating limit for your PM CPMS on a 30

- day rolling

average, in milliamps or the digital equivalent

. L = Your source emission limit expressed in lb/ton clinker.

z = Your instrument zero in milliamps or a digital equivalent , determine d from (1)(i).

R = The relative lb/ton

- clinker per milliamp or digital

equivalent , for your PM CPMS, from Equation 2.

(5) If the average of your three PM compliance test runs is at or above 75 percent of your PM emission limit you must determine your opera ting limit by averaging the PM CPMS milliamp output or digital equivalent output corresponding to your three PM performance test runs that demonstrate compliance with the emission limit using Equation 4.

Where:

X1 = The PM CPMS data points for all runs i.

n = The number of data points.

O h = Your site specific operating limit, in milliamps or digital

equivalent

.

(6) To determine continuous compliance, you must record the PM CPMS output data for all periods when the process is operating, and use all t he PM CPMS data for calculations when the source is not out

- of

- control. You must demonstrate continuous compliance by using all quality

- assured hourly average data collected by the PM CPMS for all operating hours to calculate the arithmetic average operati ng parameter in units of the operating limit (milliamps or the digital equivalent ) on a 30 operating day rolling average basis, updated at the end of each new kiln operating day. Use Equation 5 to determine the 30 kiln operating day average.

Where:

Hpvi = The hourly parameter value for hour i. Deleted: signal

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 ptPage 10 of 106

n = The number of valid hourly parameter values collected over

30 kiln operating days.

(7) Use EPA Method 5 or Method 5I of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter to determine PM emissions. For each performance test, conduct at least three separate runs each while the mill is on and the mill is off under the conditions that exist when the affected source is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. Conduct each test run to
collect a minimum sample volume of 2 dscm for determining compliance with a new source limit and 1 dscm for determining compliance with an existing source limit. Calculate the time weighted average of the results from three consecutive runs to determine compliance. You need not determine the particulate matter collected in the impingers (“back half”) of the Method 5 or Method 5I particulate sampling train to demonstrate compliance with the PM standards of this subpart. This shall not preclude the permitting authorit y from requiring a determination of the ”back half” for other purposes.

(8) For PM performance test reports used to set a PM CPMS operating limit, the electronic submission of the test report must also include the make and model of the PM CPMS instrument, serial number of the instrument, analytical principle of the instrument (e.g. beta attenuation), span of the instruments primary analytical range, milliamp or digital signal value equivalent to the instrument zero output, technique by which this zero value was determined, and the average milliamp or digital equivalent signals corresponding to each PM compliance

test run.

(d) You must install, operate, calibrate, and maintain a CEMS continuously monitoring and recording the concentration by
volume of NO X emi ssions into the atmosphere for any kiln subject
to the NO X emissions limit in §60.62(a)(3). If the kiln has an alkali bypass, NO X emissions from the alkali bypass do not need to be monitored, and NO X emission monitoring of the kiln exhaust may be done upst ream of any commingled alkali bypass gases.

(e) You must install, operate, calibrate, and maintain a CEMS for continuously monitoring and recording the concentration by
volume of SO 2 emissions into the atmosphere for any kiln subject
to the SO 2 emissions l imit in §60.62(a)(4). If you are complying with the alternative 90 percent SO 2 emissions reduction emissions limit, you must also continuously monitor and record the concentration by volume of SO 2 present at the wet scrubber inlet.Page 11 of 106

(f) The NO X and SO 2 CEMS required under paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section must be installed, operated and maintained according to Performance Specification 2 of appendix B of this part and the requirements in paragraphs (f)(1) through (5) of this section.

(1) The span value of each NO X CEMS monitor must be set at 125 percent of the maximum estimated hourly potential NO X emission concentration that translates to the applicable emissions limit at full clinker production capacity.

(2) You must conduct performance evaluations of each NO X CEMS monitor according to the requirements in §60.13(c) and Performance Specification 2 of appendix B to this part. You must use Methods 7, 7A, 7C, 7D, or 7E of appendix A

- 4 to this part for conducting the relative accuracy evaluations. The method
ASME PTC 19.10

- 1981, “Flue and Exhaust Gas Analyses,” (incorporated by reference

— see §60.17) is an acceptable alternative to Method 7 or 7C of appendix A

- 4 to this part.

(3) The span value for the SO 2 CEMS monitor is the SO 2 emission concentration that co rresponds to 125 percent of the applicable emissions limit at full clinker production capacity and the expected maximum fuel sulfur content.

(4) You must conduct performance evaluations of each SO 2 CEMS monitor according to the requirements in §60.13(c) an d Performance Specification 2 of appendix B to this part. You must use Methods 6, 6A, or 6C of appendix A

- 4 to this part for conducting the relative accuracy evaluations. The method ASME
PTC 19.10

- 1981, “Flue and Exhaust Gas Analyses,” (incorporated by ref erence

— see §60.17) is an acceptable alternative to Method 6 or 6A of appendix A

- 4 to this part.

(5) You must comply with the quality assurance requirements in Procedure 1 of appendix F to this part for each NO X and SO 2 CEMS, including quarterly accuracy de terminations for monitors, and daily calibration drift tests.

(g) For each CPMS or CEMS required under paragraphs (c) through (e) of this section:

(1) You must operate the monitoring system and collect data at all required intervals at all times the affect ed source is operating, except for periods of monitoring system malfunctions, repairs associated with monitoring system malfunctions, and required monitoring system quality assurance or quality controlPage 12 of 106

activities (including, as applicable, calibration chec ks and required zero and span adjustments).

(2) You may not use data recorded during the monitoring system malfunctions, repairs associated with monitoring system malfunctions, or required monitoring system quality assurance or control activities in calcul ations used to report emissions or operating levels. A monitoring system malfunction is any sudden, infrequent, not reasonably preventable failure of the monitoring system to provide valid data. Monitoring system failures that are caused in part by poor ma intenance or careless operation are not malfunctions. An owner or operator must use all the data collected during all other periods in reporting emissions or operating levels.

(3) You must meet the requirements of §60.13(h) when determining the 1

- hour aver ages of emissions data.

(h) You must install, operate, calibrate, and maintain instruments for continuously measuring and recording the stack gas flow rate to allow determination of the pollutant mass emissions rate to the atmosphere for each kiln subject to the PM emissions limits in §60.62(a)(1)(ii) and (iii) and (b)(1)(i) and (ii), the NO X emissions limit in §60.62(a)(3), or the SO 2 emissions limit in §60.62(a)(4) according to the requirements in paragraphs (h)(1) through (10), where appropriate, of this section.

(1) The owner or operator must install each sensor of the flow rate monitoring system in a location that provides representative measurement of the exhaust gas flow rate at the sampling location of the NO X and/or SO 2 CEMS, taking into account
the manufacturer's recommendations. The flow rate sensor is that portion of the system that senses the volumetric flow rate and generates an output proportional to that flow rate.

(2) The flow rate monitoring system must be designed to measure the exhaust gas flow rate over a range that extends from a value of at least 20 percent less than the lowest expected exhaust flow rate to a value of at least 20 percent greater than the highest expected exhaust gas flow rate.

(3) The flow rate monitoring system must hav e a minimum accuracy of 5 percent of the flow rate.

(4) The flow rate monitoring system must be equipped with a data acquisition and recording system that is capable ofPage 13 of 106

recording values over the entire range specified in paragraph (h)(2) of this section.

( 5) The signal conditioner, wiring, power supply, and data acquisition and recording system for the flow rate monitoring system must be compatible with the output signal of the flow rate sensors used in the monitoring system.

(6) The flow rate monitoring sy stem must be designed to measure a minimum of one cycle of operational flow for each successive 15

- minute period.

(7) The flow rate sensor must be able to determine the daily zero and upscale calibration drift (CD) (see sections 3.1 and
8.3 of Performance Specification 2 in appendix B to this part for a discussion of CD).

(i) Conduct the CD tests at two reference signal levels, zero (e.g., 0 to 20 percent of span) and upscale (e.g., 50 to 70 percent of span).

(ii) The absolute value of the difference betwee n the flow monitor response and the reference signal must be equal to or less than 3 percent of the flow monitor span.

(8) You must perform an initial relative accuracy test of the flow rate monitoring system according to section 8.2 of Performance Specifi cation 6 of appendix B to this part, with the exceptions noted in paragraphs (h)(8)(i) and (ii) of this section.

(i) The relative accuracy test is to evaluate the flow rate monitoring system alone rather than a continuous emission rate monitoring system.

( ii) The relative accuracy of the flow rate monitoring system shall be no greater than 10 percent of the mean value of the
reference method data.

(9) You must verify the accuracy of the flow rate monitoring system at least once per year by repeating the rel ative accuracy test specified in paragraph (h)(8) of this section.

(10) You must operate the flow rate monitoring system and record data during all periods of operation of the affected facility including periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction, excep t for periods of monitoring systemPage 14 of 106

malfunctions, repairs associated with monitoring system malfunctions, and required monitoring system quality assurance or quality control activities (including, as applicable, calibration checks and required zero and span adjustments.

(i) Development and Submittal (Upon Request) of Monitoring
Plans. To demonstrate compliance with any applicable emissions limit through performance stack testing or other emissions monitoring (including PM CPMS), you must develop a site

- speci fic monitoring plan according to the requirements in paragraphs (i)(1) through (4) of this section. This requirement also applies to you if you petition the EPA Administrator for alternative monitoring parameters under §60.13(3)(i). If you use a bag leak d etector system (BLDS), you must also meet the requirements specified in paragraph §63.1350(m)(10) of this chapter.

(1) For each continuous monitoring system (CMS) required in this section, you must develop, and submit to the permitting authority for approv al upon request, a site

- specific monitoring plan that addresses paragraphs (i)(1)(i) through (iii) of this
section. You must submit this site

- specific monitoring plan, if requested, at least 30 days before the initial performance evaluation of your CMS.

(i ) Installation of the CMS sampling probe or other interface at a measurement location relative to each affected process unit such that the measurement is representative of control of the exhaust emissions (e.g., on or downstream of the last control device) ;

(ii) Performance and equipment specifications for the sample interface, the pollutant concentration or parametric signal analyzer, and the data collection and reduction systems; and

(iii) Performance evaluation procedures and acceptance criteria (e.g., c alibrations).

(2) In your site

- specific monitoring plan, you must also address paragraphs (i)(2)(i) through (iii) of this section.

(i) Ongoing operation and maintenance procedures in accordance with the general requirements of §63.8(c)(1), (c)(3), and (c)( 4)(ii);

(ii) Ongoing data quality assurance procedures in accordance with the general requirements of §63.8(d); andPage 15 of 106

(iii) Ongoing recordkeeping and reporting procedures in accordance with the general requirements of §63.10(c), (e)(1), and (e)(2)(i).

(3) Yo u must conduct a performance evaluation of each CMS in accordance with your site

- specific monitoring plan.

(4) You must operate and maintain the CMS in continuous operation according to the site

- specific monitoring plan.

[75 FR 55035, Sept. 9, 2010, as ame nded at 78 FR 10032, Feb. 12, 2013]

§60.64 Test methods and procedures.

(a) In conducting the performance tests and relative accuracy tests required in §60.8, you must use reference methods and procedures and the test methods in appendix A of this part or other methods and procedures as specified in this section, except as provided in §60.8(b).

(b)(1)You must demonstrate compliance with the PM standards in §60.62 using EPA method 5 or method 5I.

(2) Use Method 9 and the procedures in §60.11 to determine

opa city.

(3) Any sources other than kilns (including associated alkali bypass and clinker cooler) that are subject to the 10 percent opacity limit must follow the appropriate monitoring procedures in §63.1350(f), (m)(1)through (4), (10) and (11), (o), and (p) of this chapter.

(c) Calculate and record the rolling 30 kiln operating day average emission rate daily of NO X and SO 2 according to the procedures in paragraphs (c)(1 ) of this section.

(1) Calculate the rolling 30 kiln operating day average emis sions according to equation 6:

Where:

E 30D = 30 kiln operating day average emission rate of NO X or SO 2 ,

lb/ton of clinker. Deleted: ) and (2)

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 ptPage 16 of 106

C i = Concentration of NO X or SO 2 for hour i, ppm.

Q i = Volumetric flow rate of effluent gas for hour i, where

C i and Q i are on the same basis (either wet or dry), scf/hr.

P = 30 days of clinker production during the same time period as
the NO X or SO 2 emissions measured, tons.

k = Conversion factor, 1.194 × 10 −7 for NO X and 1.660 × 10 −7 for
SO 2 , lb/scf/ppm.

n = Number of kiln operating hours over 30 kiln operating days.

(2) Reserved

(d)(1) Within 60 days after the date of completing each performance test (see §60.8) as required by this subpart you must submit the results of the performance tests conducted to demonstrate compliance under this subpart to the EPA's WebFIRE database by using the Compliance and Emissions Data Reporting Interface (CEDRI) that is accessed through the EPA's Central Data Exchange (CDX) ( http://www.epa.gov/cdx ). Performance test
data must be submitted in the file format generated through use of the EPA's Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT) (see http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ert/index.html ). Only data collected using test methods on the ERT Web site are subject to this requirement for submi tting reports electronically to WebFIRE. Owners or operators who claim that some of the information being submitted for performance tests is confidential business information (CBI) must submit a complete ERT file including information claimed to be CBI on a compact disk, flash drive or other commonly used electronic storage media to the EPA. The electronic media must be clearly marked as CBI and mailed to U.S. EPA/OAPQS/CORE CBI Office, Attention: WebFIRE Administrator, MD C404

- 02, 4930 Old Page Rd., Durham , NC 27703. The same ERT file with the CBI omitted must be submitted to the EPA via CDX as described earlier in this paragraph. At the discretion of the delegated authority, you must also submit these reports, including the CBI, to the delegated authority in the format specified by the delegated authority. For any performance test conducted using test methods that are not listed on the ERT Web site, you must submit the results of the performance test to the Administrator at the appropriate address listed in §63.13.

(2) Within 60 days after the date of completing each CEMS performance evaluation test as defined in §63.2, you must submit Deleted: For each kiln operating hour for which you do not have at least one valid 15

- minute CEMS data value, use the average emissions rate (lb/hr) from the most recent previous hour for which valid data are available.Page 17 of 1 06

relative accuracy test audit (RATA) data to the EPA's CDX by using CEDRI in accordance with paragraph (d)(1) of this section

. Only RATA pollutants that can be documented with the ERT (as listed on the ERT Web site) are subject to this requirement. For any performance evaluations with no corresponding RATA pollutants listed on the ERT Web site, you must submit the
results of the performance evaluation to the Administrator at the appropriate address listed in §63.13.

(3) For PM performance test reports used to set a PM CPMS operating limit, the electronic submission of the test report must also include the make and model of the PM CPMS instrument, serial number of the instrument, analytical principle of the instrument (e.g. beta attenuation), span of the instruments primary analytical range, milliamp value equivalent to the instrument zero output, technique by which this zero value was determined, and the average milliamp signals corresponding to each PM compliance test run.

(4) All reports required by this subpart not subject to the requirements in paragraphs (d)(1) and (2) of this section must
be sent to the Administrator at the a ppropriate address listed in §63.13. The Administrator or the delegated authority may request a report in any form suitable for the specific case (e.g., by commonly used electronic media such as Excel spreadsheet, on CD or hard copy). The Administrator ret ains the right to require submittal of reports subject to paragraph (d)(1) and (2) of this section in paper format.

§60.65 Recordkeeping and reporting requirements.

(a) Each owner or operator required to install a CPMS or CEMS under sections §60.63(c) th rough (e) shall submit reports of excess emissions. The content of these reports must comply with the requirements in §60.7(c). Notwithstanding the provisions of §60.7(c), such reports shall be submitted semiannually.

(b) Each owner or operator of faciliti es subject to the provisions of §60.63(c) through (e) shall submit semiannual reports of the malfunction information required to be recorded by §60.7(b). These reports shall include the frequency, duration, and cause of any incident resulting in deenergiza tion of any device controlling kiln emissions or in the venting of emissions directly to the atmosphere.Page 18 of 106

(c) The requirements of this section remain in force until and unless the Agency, in delegating enforcement authority to a State under section 111(c) o f the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7411, approves reporting requirements or an alternative means of compliance surveillance adopted by such States. In that event, affected sources within the State will be relieved of the obligation to comply with this section, provided that they comply with the requirements established by the State.

§60.66 Delegation of authority.

(a) This subpart can be implemented and enforced by the U.S. EPA or a delegated authority such as a State, local, or Tribal agency. You should contac t your U.S. EPA Regional Office to find out if this subpart is delegated to a State, local, or Tribal agency within your State.

(b) In delegating implementation and enforcement authority to a State, local, or Tribal agency, the approval authorities contain ed paragraphs (b)(1) through (4) of this section are retained by the Administrator of the U.S EPA and are not transferred to the State, local, or Tribal agency.

(1) Approval of an alternative to any non

- opacity emissions
standard.

(2) Approval of a major c hange to test methods under §60.8(b). A “major change to test method” is defined in 40 CFR
63.90.

(3) Approval of a major change to monitoring under §60.13(i). A “major change to monitoring” is defined in 40 CFR 63.90.

(4) Approval of a major change to rec ordkeeping/reporting under §60.7(b) through (f). A “major change to recordkeeping/reporting” is defined in 40 CFR 63.90.

PART 63

-- [AMENDED]

9. The authority citation for part 63 continues to read as

follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq

.

Subpart LLL

— [Amended] Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier NewPage 19 of 106

§ 63.1340 What parts of my plant does this subpart cover?

(a) The provisions of this subpart apply to each new and existing portland cement plant which is a major source or an area source as defined in § 63.2.

(b) The affected sources subj ect to this subpart are:

(1) Each kiln including alkali bypasses and inline coal mills, except for kilns that burn hazardous waste and are subject to and regulated under subpart EEE of this part;

(2) Each clinker cooler at any portland cement plant;

(3) Ea ch raw mill at any portland cement plant;

(4) Each finish mill at any portland cement plant;

(5) Each raw material dryer at any portland cement plant;

(6) Each raw material, clinker, or finished product storage bin at any portland cement plant that is a ma jor source;

(7) Each conveying system transfer point including those associated with coal preparation used to convey coal from the mill to the kiln at any portland cement plant that is a major

source;

(8) Each bagging and bulk loading and unloading system at any portland cement plant that is a major source; and

(9) Each open clinker storage pile at any portland cement plant.

(c) Onsite sources that are subject to standards for nonmetallic mineral processing plants in subpart OOO, part 60 of this chapter are not subject to this subpart. Crushers are not covered by this subpart regardless of their location.

(d) If you are subject to any of the provisions of this subpart you are also subject to title V permitting requirements.

[75 FR 55051, Sept. 9, 2010, as am ended at 78 FR 10036, Feb. 12, 2013] Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 ptPage 20 of 106

§ 63.1341 Definitions.

All terms used in this subpart that are not defined in this section have the meaning given to them in the CAA and in subpart A of this part.

Affirmative defense means, in the context of an enfor cement proceeding, a response or defense put forward by a defendant, regarding which the defendant has the burden of proof, and the merits of which are independently and objectively evaluated in a judicial or administrative proceeding.

Alkali bypass means a duct between the feed end of the kiln and the preheater tower through which a portion of the kiln exit gas stream is withdrawn and quickly cooled by air or water to avoid excessive buildup of alkali, chloride and/or sulfur on the raw feed. This may also be referred to as the “kiln exhaust gas bypass”.

Bagging system means the equipment which fills bags with portland cement.

Bin means a manmade enclosure for storage of raw materials, clinker, or finished product prior to further processing at a portland ce ment plant.

Clinker means the product of the process in which limestone and other materials are heated in the kiln and is then ground with gypsum and other materials to form cement.

Clinker cooler means equipment into which clinker product leaving the kiln is placed to be cooled by air supplied by a forced draft or natural draft supply system.

Continuous monitor means a device which continuously samples the regulated parameter specified in § 63.1350 of this subpart without interruption, evaluates the detect or response at least once every 15 seconds, and computes and records the average value at least every 60 seconds, except during allowable periods of calibration and except as defined otherwise by the continuous emission monitoring system performance specif ications in appendix B to part 60 of this chapter.

Conveying system means a device for transporting materials from one piece of equipment or location to another location within a facility. Conveying systems include but are not limitedPage 21 of 106

to the following: fee ders, belt conveyors, bucket elevators and pneumatic systems.

Conveying system transfer point means a point where any material including but not limited to feed material, fuel, clinker or product, is transferred to or from a conveying system, or between se parate parts of a conveying system.

Crusher means a machine designed to reduce large rocks from the quarry into materials approximately the size of gravel.

Dioxins and furans (D/F) means tetra

- , penta

- , hexa

- , hepta

- , and octa

- chlorinated dibenzo dioxins a nd furans.

Facility means all contiguous or adjoining property that is under common ownership or control, including properties that are separated only by a road or other public right

- of

- way.

Feed means the prepared and mixed materials, which include
but ar e not limited to materials such as limestone, clay, shale, sand, iron ore, mill scale, cement kiln dust and flyash, that are fed to the kiln. Feed does not include the fuels used in the kiln to produce heat to form the clinker product.

Finish mill means a roll crusher, ball and tube mill or other size reduction equipment used to grind clinker to a fine powder. Gypsum and other materials may be added to and blended with clinker in a finish mill. The finish mill also includes the air separator associated with the finish mill.

Greenfield kiln, in

- line kiln/raw mill, or raw material dryer means a kiln, in

- line kiln/raw mill, or raw material dryer for which construction is commenced at a plant site (where no kilns and no in

- line kiln/raw mills were in operation a t any time prior to March 24, 1998) after March 24, 1998.

Hazardous waste is defined in § 261.3 of this chapter.

In

- line coal mill means those coal mills using kiln exhaust gases in their process. Coal mills with a heat source other than the kiln or coal m ills using exhaust gases from the clinker cooler are not an in

- line coal mill.

In

- line kiln/raw mill means a system in a portland cement production process where a dry kiln system is integrated with the raw mill so that all or a portion of the kiln exhaust gasesPage 22 of 106

are used to perform the drying operation of the raw mill, with no auxiliary heat source used. In this system the kiln is capable of operating without the raw mill operating, but the raw mill cannot operate without the kiln gases, and consequently,

t he raw mill does not generate a separate exhaust gas stream.

Kiln means a device, including any associated preheater or precalciner devices, inline raw mills, inline coal mills or alkali bypasses that produces clinker by heating limestone and other materia ls for subsequent production of portland cement. Because the inline raw mill and inline coal mill are considered an integral part of the kiln, for purposes of determining the appropriate emissions limit, the term kiln also applies to the exhaust of the inl ine raw mill and the inline coal mill.

Kiln exhaust gas bypass means alkali bypass.

Monovent means an exhaust configuration of a building or emission control device (e. g. positive pressure fabric filter) that extends the length of the structure and has a width very small in relation to its length (i. e., length to width ratio is typically greater than 5:1). The exhaust may be an open vent with or without a roof, louvered vents, or a combination of such
features.

New brownfield kiln, in

- line kiln raw mill, or raw material dryer means a kiln, in

- line kiln/raw mill or raw material dryer for which construction is commenced at a plant site (where kilns and/or in

- line kiln/raw mills were in operation prior to March 24, 1998) after March 24, 1998.

New source means any source that commenced construction or reconstruction after May 6, 2009, for purposes of determining the applicability of the kiln, clinker cooler and raw material dryer emissions limits for mercury, PM, THC, and HCl.

One

- minute average means the avera ge of thermocouple or other sensor responses calculated at least every 60 seconds from responses obtained at least once during each consecutive 15 second period.

Open clinker storage pile means a clinker storage pile on the ground for more than three days that is not completely enclosed in a building or structure.Page 23 of 106

Operating day means any 24

- hour period beginning at 12:00 midnight during which the kiln produces clinker at any time. For calculating Rolling Average emissions, an operating day do es not include the hours of operation during startup or shutdown.

Portland cement plant means any facility manufacturing portland cement.

Raw material dryer means an impact dryer, drum dryer, paddle

equipped rapid dryer, air separator, or other equipment used to
reduce the moisture content of feed or other materials.

Raw mill means a ball and tube mill, vertical roller mill or other size reduction equipment, that is not part of an in

- line kiln/raw mill, used to grind feed to the appropriate size. Moisture may be added or removed from the feed during the grinding operation. If the raw mill is used to remove moisture from feed materials, it is also, by definition, a raw material dryer. The raw mill also includes the air separator associated with the raw mill.

Rolling averag e means the weighted average of all data, meeting QA/QC requirements or otherwise normalized, collected during the applicable averaging period. The period of a rolling average stipulates the frequency of data averaging and reporting

. To demonstrate complia nce with an operating parameter

a 30

- day rolling average period requires calculation of a new average value each operating day and shall include the average of all the hourly averages of the specific operating parameter

. For demonstration of compliance wit h an emissions limit based on pollutant concentration a 30

- day rolling average is comprised of the average of all the hourly average concentrations over the previous 30 operating days

. For demonstration of compliance with an emissions limit based on lbs

- po llutant per production unit
the 30

- day rolling average is calculated by summing the hourly mass emissions over the previous 30 operating days, then dividing that sum by the total production during the same period.

Run average means the average of the one

- minute recorded paramet er values for a run.

Shutdown means the cessation of kiln operation. Shutdown begins when feed to the kiln is halted and ends when continuous kiln rotation ceases. Deleted:

Deleted: Rolling average means the weighted

averag e of all averages data meeting QA/QC requirements or otherwise normalized , collected during over the applicable averaging period

. relevant to that section where as applicable . The period of a rolling average stipulates the frequency of data averaging and

r eporting ; for example a thirty

- day rolling average period requires calculation of a new average value each day that includes the average emissions over the previous thirty days divided by the total production during
the se same period s.

. A twelve month rol ling average stipulates a new average value calculated each month that inclu des the average emissions over the previous twelve
months divided by the total production during the same periods. ¶

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt, Strikethrough

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 ptPage 24 of 106

Sorbent means activated carbon, lime, or any other type of material injected into kiln exhau st for the purposes of capturing and removing any hazardous air pollutant.

Startup means the time from when a shutdown kiln first begins firing fuel until it begins producing clinker. Startup begins when a shutdown kiln turns on the induced draft fan and b egins firing fuel in the main burner. Startup ends when feed is being continuously introduced into the kiln for at least 120 minutes or when the feed rate exceeds 60 percent of the kiln design limitation rate, whichever occurs first.

TEQ means the internat ional method of expressing toxicity equivalents for dioxins and furans as defined in U.S. EPA, Interim Procedures for Estimating Risks Associated with Exposures to Mixtures of Chlorinated Dibenzo

- p

- dioxins and

- dibenzofurans (CDDs and CDFs) and 1989 Update , March 1989.

Total organic HAP means, for the purposes of this subpart, the sum of the concentrations of compounds of formaldehyde, benzene, toluene, styrene, m

- xylene, p

- xylene, o

- xylene, acetaldehyde, and naphthalene as measured by EPA Test Method 320

o r Method 18 of appendix A to this part or ASTM D6348

- 03 1 or a combination of these methods, as appropriate. If measurement results for any pollutant are reported as below the method detection level (e.g., laboratory analytical results for one or

more samp le components are below the method defined analytical detection level), you must use the method detection level as the measured emissions level for that pollutant in calculating the total organic HAP value. The measured result for a multiple component anal ysis (e.g., analytical values for multiple Method 18 fractions) may include a combination of method detection level data and analytical data reported above the method detection level. The owner or operator of an affected source may request the use of other test methods to make this determination under paragraphs 63.7(e)(2)(ii) and (f) of this part.

1 When using ASTM D6348

- 03, the following conditions must be

met:

(1) The test plan preparation and implementation in the
Annexes to ASTM D6348

- 03, Sections A1 through A8 are mandatory; (2) For ASTM D6348

- 03 Annex A5 (Analyte Spiking Technique), the percent R must be determined for each target analyte (see Equation A5.5); (3) For the ASTM D6348

- 03 test data to be acceptable for a target analyte percent R must be 70 percent ≥ RPage 25 of 106

≤ 130 percent; and (4) The percent R value for each compound must be reported in the test report and all field measurements corrected with the calculated percent R value for that compound using the following equation: Reported Result = The m easured concentration in the stack divided by the calculated percent R value and then the whole term multiplied by 100.

Totally enclosed conveying system transfer point means a conveying system transfer point that is enclosed on all sides, top, and bottom.

[64 FR 31925, June 14, 1999, as amended at 67 FR 16619, Apr. 5, 2002; 75 FR 55051, Sept. 9, 2010; 78 FR 10037, Feb. 12, 2013]

Emission Standards and Operating Limits

§ 63.1342 Standards: General.

Table 1 to this subpart provides cross references to th e 40 CFR part 63, subpart A, general provisions, indicating the applicability of the general provisions requirements to subpart

LLL.

§ 63.1343 What standards apply to my kilns, clinker coolers, raw material dryers, and open clinker storage piles?

(a) General

. The provisions in this section apply to each kiln and any alkali bypass associated with that kiln, clinker cooler, raw material dryer, and open clinker storage pile. All D/F, HCl, and total hydrocarbon (THC) emissions limit are on a dry basis. The D/F, H Cl, and THC limits for kilns are corrected to 7 percent oxygen. All THC emissions limits are measured as propane. Standards for mercury and THC are based on a rolling 30

- day average. If using a CEMS to determine compliance with the HCl standard, this stand ard is based on a rolling 30

- day

average

. You must ensure appropriate corrections for moisture are made when measuring flow rates used to calculate mercury emissions. The 30

- day period means all operating hours within 30 consecutive kiln operating days

exc luding periods of startup and shutdown. All emissions limits for kilns, clinker coolers, and raw material dryers Formatted: LeftPage 26 of 106

currently in effect that are superseded by the limits below continue to apply until the compliance date of the limits below, or until the sourc e certifies compliance with the limits below, whichever is earlier.

(b) Kilns, clinker coolers, raw material dryers, raw mills, and finish mills. (1) The emissions limits for these sources are shown in Table 1 below. PM limits for existing kilns also app ly to kilns that have undergone a modification as defined in subpart A of part 60 of title 40.

T ABLE 1

—

E MISSIONS L IMITS FOR K ILNS , C LINKER C OOLERS , R AW M ATERIAL D RYERS , R AW AND F INISH M ILLS

If your

source is a (an): And the

operating mode is: And if

is located
at a: Your emissions

limits are: And the

units of the emissions limit

are: The oxygen

correction factor is:

1. Existing
kiln Normal

operation Major

or area

source PM 1 0.07

D/F 2 0.2 Mercury 55
THC 3 4 24 lb/ton

clinker ng/dscm (TEQ) lb/MM

tons clin ker ppmvd NA.

7 percent.
NA. 7 percent.

2. Existing
kiln Normal

operation Major

source HCl 3 ppmvd 7 percent.

3. Existing
kiln Startup

and
shutdown Major

or area

source Work practices

(63.1346( g )) NA NA.

4. New kiln Normal

operation Major

or area

sourc e PM 1 0.02

D/F 2 0.2 Mercury 21
THC 3 4 24 lb/ton

clinker ng/dscm (TEQ) lb/MM

tons clinker ppmvd NA.

7 percent.

NA 7 percent. Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted: f

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 ptPage 27 of 106

5. New kiln Normal

operation Major

source HCl 3 ppmvd 7 percent.

6. New kiln Startup

and
shutdown Major

or area

source Work practi ces

(63.1346(f)) NA NA.

7. Existing clinker
cooler Normal

operation Major

or area

source PM 0.07 lb/ton
clinker NA.

8. Existing clinker
cooler Startup

and
shutdown Major

or area

source Work practices

(63.1348(b)(9)) NA NA.

9. New clinker
cooler Normal

o peration Major

or area

source PM 0.02 lb/ton
clinker NA.

10. New clinker
cooler Startup

and
shutdown Major

or area

source Work practices

(63.1348(b)(9)) NA NA.

11. Existing

or new

raw material dryer Normal

operation Major

or area

source THC 3 4 24 ppmvd N A.

12. Existing

or new

raw material dryer Startup

and
shutdown Major

or area

source Work practices

(63.1348(b)(9)) NA NA.

13. Existing

or new

raw or finish
mill All

operating
modes Major

source Opacity 10 percent NA.

1 The initial and subsequent PM perf ormance tests are performed using Method 5 or 5I and consist of three test run s.

2 If the average temperature at the inlet to the first PM control device (fabric filter or electrostatic precipitator) during the D/F performance test is 400 °F or less t his limit is changed to 0.40 ng/dscm (TEQ). Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted: 1

- hrPage 28 of 106 3 Measured as propane.

4 Any source subject to the 24 ppmvd THC limit may elect to meet an alternative limit of 12 ppmvd for total organic HAP.

(2) When there is an alkali bypass and/or an inline coal mill
with a separate stack associated with a kiln, the combined PM emissions from the kiln and the alkali bypass stack and/or the inline coal mill stack are subject to the PM emissions limit. Existing kilns that combine the clinker cooler exhaust and/or alkali bypass and/or coal mill exhaust with the kiln exhaust and send the combined exhaust to the PM control device as a single stream may meet an alternative PM emissions limit. This limit is calculated using Equation 1 of this section:

Where:

PM alt = Alternative PM emission limit for commingled sources.

0.006 = The PM exhaust concentration (gr/dscf) equivalent to

0.070 lb per ton clinker where clinker cooler and kiln exhaust gas are not combined.

1.65 = The conversion factor of ton feed per ton clinker.

Q k = The exh aust flow of the kiln (dscf/ton feed).

Q c = The exhaust flow of the clinker cooler (dscf/ton feed).

Q ab = The exhaust flow of the alkali bypass (dscf/ton feed).

Q cm = The exhaust flow of the coal mill (dscf/ton feed).

7000 = The conversion factor for grain s (gr) per lb.

For new kilns that combine kiln exhaust , clinker cooler gas and/or coal mill and alkali bypass exhaust, the limit is calculated using the Equation 2 of this section:

Where:

PM alt = Alternative PM emission limit for commingled sources. Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted: and

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 ptPage 29 of 106

0.002 = The PM exhaust concentration (gr/dscf) equivalent to

0.020 lb per ton clinker where clinker cooler and kiln exhaust gas are not combined.

1.65 = The conversion factor of ton feed per ton clinker.

Q k = The exhaust flow of the kiln (dscf/ton feed).

Q c = The exhaust flow of the clinker cooler (dscf/ton feed).

Q ab = The exhaust flow of the alkali bypass (dscf/ton feed).

Q cm = The exhaust flow of the coal mill (dscf/ton feed).

7000 = The conversion factor for gr per lb.

(c) Open clinker storage pile. The owner or operator of an open clinker storage pile must prepare, and operate in accordance with, the fugitive dust emissions control measures, described in their operation and maintenance plan (see § 63.1347 of this subpart), that is appropriate for the si te conditions as specified in paragraphs (c)(1) through (3) of this section. The operation and maintenance plan must also describe the measures that will be used to minimize fugitive dust emissions from piles of clinker, such as accidental spillage, that a re not part of open clinker storage piles.

(1) The operation and maintenance plan must identify and describe the location of each current or future open clinker storage pile and the fugitive dust emissions control measures the owner or operator will use to minimize fugitive dust emissions from each open clinker storage pile.

(2) For open clinker storage piles, the operations and maintenance plan must specify that one or more of the following control measures will be used to minimize to the greatest extent

p racticable fugitive dust from open clinker storage piles: Locating the source inside a partial enclosure, installing and operating a water spray or fogging system, applying appropriate chemical dust suppression agents, use of a wind barrier, compaction, us e of tarpaulin or other equally effective cover or use of a vegetative cover. You must select, for inclusion in the operations and maintenance plan, the fugitive dust control measure or measures listed in this paragraph that are most appropriate for site c onditions. The plan must also explain how the measure or measures selected are applicable and appropriatePage 30 of 106

for site conditions. In addition, the plan must be revised as needed to reflect any changing conditions at the source.

(3) Temporary piles of clinker that result from accidental spillage or clinker storage cleaning operations must be cleaned up within 3 days.

(d) Emission limits in effect prior to September 9, 2010. Any source defined as an existing source in § 63.1351, and that was subject to a PM, mer cury, THC, D/F, or opacity emissions limit prior to September 9, 2010, must continue to meet the limits as shown in Table 2 below until September 9, 2015.

Table 2. Emissions limits in effect prior to September 9, 2010, for Kilns (Rows 1

- 4), Clinker Coolers (Row 5), and Raw Material Dryers (Rows 6

- 9).

If your source is and And if it is
located
at Your

emissions limits

are 1 : And the

units of
the emissions limit

are:

1. An existing kiln it commenced

const ruction

or reconstruction on or prior to December 2,
2005 A major

source PM

- 0.3

Opacity

- 20 D/F

– 0.2 2

THC

- 50 3,4 lb/ton

feed percent ng/dscm (TEQ) ppmvd

2. An existing kiln it commenced

construction

or reconstruction
after December 2, 2005 A majo r

source PM

- 0.3

Opacity

- 20 D/F

– 0.2 2

THC

– 20 3,5 Mercury

– 41 6 lb/ton

feed percent ng/dscm (TEQ) ppmvd ug/dscm

3. An existing kiln it commenced

construction

or An area

source D/F

–

0.2 2 ng/dscm

(TEQ) ppmvd Deleted: in 76FR2836

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted: shown in Table 2 to this section

Deleted: ¶Page 31 of 106 reconstruction on or prior to December 2,
2005 THC

– 50 3,4

4. An existing kiln it commenced

construction

or reconstruction
after December 2, 2005 An area

source D/F

–

0.2 2

THC

– 20 3,5 Mercury

– 41 6 ng/dscm

(TEQ) ppmvd ug/dscm

5. An existing clinker cooler NA A major

source PM

- 0.1

Op acity

- 10 lb/ton

feed percent

6. An Existing raw material dryer it commenced

construction

or reconstruction on or prior to December 2,
2005 A major

source THC

–

50 3,4 Opacity

- 10 ppmvd

Percent

7. An Existing raw material dryer it commenced

constructio n

or reconstruction
after December 2, 2005 A major

source THC

–

20 3,5 Opacity

- 10 ppmvd

percent

8. An Existing raw material dryer it commenced

construction

or reconstruction on or prior to December 2, 2005 An area

source THC

–

50 3,4 ppmvd

9. An Existi ng raw material dryer it commenced

construction

or reconstruction
after December 2, 2005 An area

source THC

–

20 3,5 ppmvd

1 All emission limits expressed as a concentration basis (ppmvd, ng/dscm) are corrected to seven percent oxygen.

2 If the aver age temperature at the inlet to the first particulate matter control device (fabric filter or Deleted: ¶Page 32 of 106

electrostatic precipitator) during the D/F performance test is
400 o F or less, this limit is changed to 0.4 ng/dscm (TEQ).

3 Measured as propane.

4 Only applies t o Greenfield kilns or raw material dryers.

5 As an alternative, a source may demonstrate a 98 percent reduction in THC emissions from the exit of the kiln or raw material dryer to discharge to the atmosphere. Inline raw mills are considered to be an in tegral part of the kiln.

6 As an alternative, a source may route the emissions through a packer bed or spray tower wet scrubber with a liquid

- to

- gas ratio of 30 gallons per 1000 actual cubic feet per minute or more and meet a site

- specific emission limit based on the measured performance of the wet scrubber.

§ 63.1344 Reserved

§ 63.1345 Emissions limits for affected sources other than kilns; clinker coolers; new and reconstructed raw material dryers.

The owner or operator of each new or existing raw material, clinker, or finished pro duct storage bin; conveying system transfer point; bagging system; bulk loading or unloading system; raw and finish mills; and each existing raw material dryer, at a facility which is a major source subject to the provisions of this subpart must not cause to be discharged any gases from these affected sources which exhibit opacity in excess of 10 percent.

§ 63.1346 Operating limits for kilns.

(a) The owner or operator of a kiln subject to a D/F emissions limitation under § 63.1343 must operate the kiln su ch that the temperature of the gas at the inlet to the kiln PM control device (PMCD) and alkali bypass PMCD, if applicable, does not exceed the applicable temperature limit specified in paragraph (b) of this section. The owner or operator of an in

line kil n/raw mill subject to a D/F emissions limitation under § 63.1343 must operate the in

- line kiln/raw mill, such that:

(1) When the raw mill of the in

- line kiln/raw mill is operating, the applicable temperature limit for the main in

- line kiln/raw mill exhaust , specified in paragraph (b) of this section and established during the performance test when the raw mill was operating, is not exceeded, except during periods of Deleted: ¶

Deleted: ¶

Deleted: ¶

Deleted: ¶

Deleted: ¶

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted: Affirmative defense for violation of emission standards during malfunction. ¶ In response to an action to enforce the standards set forth in § 63.1343(b) and (c) and § 63 .1345 and you may assert an affirmative defense to a claim for civil penalties for violations of such standards that are caused by malfunction, as defined at 40 CFR 63.2. Appropriate penalties may be assessed if you fail to meet your burden of proving all of the requirements in the affirmative defense. The affirmative defense shall not be available for claims for injunctive relief. ¶ (a) Assertion of affirmative defense. To establish the affirmative defense in any action to enforce such a standard, you must

t imely meet the reporting requirements in paragraph (b) of this section, and must prove by a preponderance of evidence that: ¶ (1) The violation: ¶ (i) Was caused by a sudden, infrequent, and unavoidable failure of air pollution control equipment, process equip ment, or a process to operate in a normal or usual manner; and ¶ (ii) Could not have been prevented through careful planning, proper design or better operation and maintenance practices; and ¶ (iii) Did not stem from any activity or event
that could have been foreseen and avoided, or planned for; and ¶ (iv) Was not part of a recurring pattern indicative of inadequate design, operation, or maintenance; and ¶ (2) Repairs were made as expeditiously as possible when a violation occurred; and ¶ (3) The frequency, amount, and duration of the violation (including any bypass) were minimized to the maximum extent practicable;
and ¶ (4) If the violation resulted from a bypass of control equipment or a process, then the bypass was unavoidable to prevent loss of life, personal inju ry, or severe property damage; and ¶ (5) All possible steps were taken to minimize the impact of the violation on ambient air quality, the environment, and human health;
and ¶ (6) All emissions monitoring and control systems were kept in operation if at all

po ssible, consistent with safety and good air pollution control practices; and ¶

... Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: NonePage 33 of 106

startup and shutdown when the temperature limit may be exceeded by no more than 10 percent.

(2) When the raw mill of the in

- line kiln/raw mill is not operating, the applicable temperature limit for the main in

- line kiln/raw mill exhaust, specified in paragraph (b) of this section and established during the performance test when the raw mill was n ot operating, is not exceeded, except during periods of startup/shutdown when the temperature limit may be exceeded by no more than 10 percent.

(3) If the in

- line kiln/raw mill is equipped with an alkali bypass, the applicable temperature limit for the alk ali bypass specified in paragraph (b) of this section and established during the performance test, with or without the raw mill operating, is not exceeded, except during periods of startup/shutdown when the temperature limit may be exceeded by
no more than 10 percent.

(b) The temperature limit for affected sources meeting the limits of paragraph (a) of this section or paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(3) of this section is determined in accordance with § 63.1349(b)(3)(iv).

(c) For an affected source subject to a D/F emissions limitation under § 63.1343 that employs sorbent injection as an emission control technique for D/F control, you must operate the sorbent injection system in accordance with paragraphs (c)(1) and (2) of this section.

(1) The rolling three

- ho ur average activated sorbent injection rate must be equal to or greater than the sorbent injection rate determined in accordance with § 63.1349(b)(3)(vi).

(2) You must either:

(i) Maintain the minimum activated carbon injection carrier gas flow rate, as a rolling three

- hour average, based on the manufacturer's specifications. These specifications must be documented in the test plan developed in accordance with § 63.7(c), or

(ii) Maintain the minimum activated carbon injection carrier gas pressure drop, as a rolling three

- hour average, based on the manufacturer's specifications. These specifications must bePage 34 of 106

documented in the test plan developed in accordance with § 63.7(c).

(d) Except as provided in paragraph (e) of this section, for an affected source subjec t to a D/F emissions limitation under
§ 63.1343 that employs carbon injection as an emission control technique you must specify and use the brand and type of sorbent used during the performance test until a subsequent performance test is conducted, unless the site

- specific performance test plan contains documentation of key parameters that affect adsorption and the owner or operator establishes limits based on those parameters, and the limits on these parameters are maintained.

(e) For an affected source su bject to a D/F emissions limitation under § 63.1343 that employs carbon injection as an emission control technique you may substitute, at any time, a different brand or type of sorbent provided that the replacement has equivalent or improved properties com pared to the sorbent specified in the site

- specific performance test plan and used in the performance test. The owner or operator must maintain documentation that the substitute sorbent will provide the same or better level of control as the original sorbe nt.

(f) No kiln may use as a raw material or fuel any fly ash where the mercury content of the fly ash has been increased through the use of activated carbon, or any other sorbent, unless the facility can demonstrate that the use of that fly ash will not r esult in an increase in mercury emissions over baseline emissions (i.e., emissions not using the fly ash). The facility has the burden of proving there has been no emissions increase over baseline. Once the kiln is in compliance with a mercury emissions li mit specified in § 63.1343, this paragraph no longer applies.

(g) During periods of startup and shutdown you must meet the requirements listed in (g)(1) through (4) of this section.

(1) During startup you must use any one or combination of the following cl ean fuels: natural gas, synthetic natural gas, propane, distillate oil, synthesis gas (syngas), and ultra

- low sulfur diesel (ULSD) until the kiln reaches a temperature of 1200 degrees Fahrenheit.Page 35 of 106

(2) Combustion of the primary kiln fuel may commence once th e kiln temperature reaches 1200 degrees Fahrenheit.

(3) All dry sorbent and activated carbon systems that control hazardous air pollutants must be turned on and operating at the time the gas stream at the inlet to the baghouse or ESP reaches 300 degrees Fahrenheit (five minute average) during startup

. Temperature of the gas stream is to be measured at the inlet of the baghouse or ESP every minute

. Such injection systems can be turned off during shutdown. Particulate control and all remaining devices that control hazardous air pollutants should be operational during startup and shutdown.

(4) You must keep records as specified in § 63.1355 during periods of startup and shutdown.

§ 63.1347 Operation and maintenance plan requirements.

(a) You must prepare, for each affected source subject to the provisions of this subpart, a written operations and maintenance plan. The plan must be submitted to the Administrat or for review and approval as part of the application for a part 70 permit and must include the following information:

(1) Procedures for proper operation and maintenance of the affected source and air pollution control devices in order to meet the emissio ns limits and operating limits, including fugitive dust control measures for open clinker piles, of §§ 63.1343 , 63.1345, and 63.1346. Your operations and maintenance plan must address periods of startup and shutdown;

(2) Corrective actions to be taken when required by paragraph § 63.1350(f)(3);

(3) Procedures to be used during an inspection of the components of the combustion system of each kiln and each in

line kiln raw mill located at the facility at least once per

year.

(b) Failure to co mply with any provision of the operations and maintenance plan developed in accordance with this section is a violation of the standard.

§ 63.1348 Compliance requirements. Deleted: air pollution control devices

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted: prior to combusting any fue l

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted: to the air pollution control device

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted: content

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted: fifteen

Deleted: s

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted: during startup until all HAP control devices are operating, a nd every fifteen minutes during shutdown until any activated carbon or lime injection systems are not operating.

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted: [75 FR 55054, Sept. 9, 2010, as amended at 78 FR 1 0039, Feb. 12, 2013] ¶

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt Deleted: through 63.1348.Page 36 of 106

(a) Initial Performance Test Requirements. For an affected source subject to this subpart, you must demonstrate compliance with the emissions standards and operating limits by using the test methods and procedures in §§ 63.1349 and 63.7. Any cement kiln that has been subject to the requirements of subpart CCCC or subpart DDDD of 40 CFR Part 60, and is now electing to cease burning nonhazardous solid waste and become subject to this subpart, must meet all the initial compliance testing requirements each time it becomes subject to this subpart, even if it was previously subject to this su bpart.

N OTE TO PARAGRAPH ( a ): The first day of the 30 operating day performance test is the first day after the compliance date following completion of the field testing and data collection that demonstrates that the CPMS or CEMS has satisfied the
releva nt CPMS performance evaluation or CEMS performance specification (e.g., PS 2, 12A, or 12B) acceptance criteria. The performance test period is complete at the end of the 30th consecutive operating day. See § 63.1341 for definition of operating day and § 63 .1348(b)(1) for the CEMS operating requirements. The source has the option of performing the compliance test earlier then the compliance date if desired.

(1) PM Compliance. If you are subject to limitations on PM emissions under § 63.1343(b), you must dem onstrate compliance with the PM emissions standards by using the test methods and procedures in § 63.1349(b)(1).

(2) Opacity Compliance. If you are subject to the limitations on opacity under § 63.1345, you must demonstrate compliance with the opacity emis sions standards by using the performance test methods and procedures in § 63.1349(b)(2). Use the maximum 6

- minute average opacity exhibited during the performance test period to determine whether the affected source is in compliance with the standard.

(3) D/F compliance. (i) If you are subject to limitations on D/F emissions under § 63.1343(b), you must demonstrate initial compliance with the D/F emissions standards by using the performance test methods and procedures in § 63.1349(b)(3). The owner or operat or of a kiln with an in

- line raw mill must demonstrate initial compliance by conducting separate performance tests while the raw mill is operating and the raw mill is not operating. The D/F concentration must be determined
for each run and the arithmetic a verage of the concentrationsPage 37 of 106

measured for the three runs must be calculated to determine compliance. The owner or operator of a kiln with an in

- line raw mill must demonstrate compliance by conducting separate performance tests while the raw mill is operati ng and while the raw mill is not operating. Determine the D/F TEQ concentration for each run and calculate the arithmetic average of the TEQ concentrations measured for the three runs to determine continuous compliance.

(ii) If you are subject to a D/F emi ssions limitation under § 63.1343(b), you must demonstrate compliance with the temperature operating limits specified in § 63.1346 by using the performance test methods and procedures in § 63.1349(b)(3)(ii) through (b)(3)(iv). Use the arithmetic average of the temperatures measured during the three runs to determine the applicable temperature limit.

(iii) If activated carbon injection is used and you are subject to a D/F emissions limitation under § 63.1343(b), you must demonstrate compliance with the activ ated carbon injection rate operating limits specified in § 63.1346 by using the performance test methods and procedures in § 63.1349(b)(3)(v).

(iv) If activated carbon injection is used, you must also develop a carrier gas parameter (either the carrier gas flow rate or the carrier gas pressure drop) during the initial performance test and updated during any subsequent performance test conducted under § 63.1349(b)(3) that meets the requirements of § 63.1349(b)(3)(vi). Compliance is demonstrated if the system is maintained within ± 5 percent accuracy during the performance test determined in accordance with the procedures and criteria submitted for review in your monitoring plan required in section 63.1350(p).

(4)(i) THC Compliance. If you are subject to limit ations on THC emissions under § 63.1343(b), you must demonstrate compliance with the THC emissions standards by using the performance test methods and procedures in § 63.1349(b)(4)(i). You must use the average THC concentration obtained during the first 30 kiln operating days after the compliance date of this rule to determine initial compliance.

(ii) Total Organic HAP Emissions Tests. If you elect to demonstrate compliance with the total organic HAP emissions limit under § 63.1343(b) in lieu of the THC emi ssions limit, you must demonstrate compliance with the total organic HAP emissionsPage 38 of 106

standards by using the performance test methods and procedures in § 63.1349(b)(7.

(iii) If you are demonstrating initial compliance, you must conduct the separate performanc e tests as specified in § 63.1349(b)(7) while the raw mill of the inline kiln/raw mill is operating and while the raw mill of the inline kiln/raw mill is not operating.

(iv) The time weighted average total organic HAP concentration measured during the sepa rate initial performance test specified by § 63.1349(b)(7) must be used to determine initial compliance.

(v) The time weighted average THC concentration measured during the initial performance test specified by § 63.1349(b)(4) must be used to determine the site

- specific THC limit. Using the fraction of time the inline kiln/raw mill is on and the fraction of time that the inline kiln/raw mill is off, calculate this
limit as a time weighted average of the THC levels measured during raw mill on and raw mill of f testing using one of the two approaches in § 63.1349(b)(7)(vii) or (viii) depending on the level of organic HAP measured during the compliance test.

(5) Mercury Compliance. If you are subject to limitations on mercury emissions in § 63.1343(b), you must demonstrate compliance with the mercury standards by using the performance test methods and procedures in § 63.1349(b)(5). You must demonstrate compliance by operating a mercury CEMS or a sorbent trap based CEMS. Compliance with the mercury emissions stand ard must be determined based on the first 30 operating days you operate a mercury CEMS or sorbent trap monitoring system after the compliance date of this rule.

(i) In calculating a 30 operating day emissions value using an integrating sorbent trap CEMS, a ssign the average Hg emissions concentration determined for an integrating period (e.g., 7 day sorbent trap monitoring system sample) to each relevant hour of the kiln operating days spanned by each integrated sample. Calculate the 30 kiln operating day em issions rate value using the assigned hourly Hg emissions concentrations and the respective flow and production rate values collected during the 30 kiln operating day performance test period. Depending on the duration of each integrated sampling period,

yo u may not be able to calculate the 30 kiln operating dayPage 39 of 106

emissions value until several days after the end of the 30 kiln operating day performance test period.

(ii) For example, a sorbent trap monitoring system producing an integrated 7

- day sample will pro vide Hg concentration data for each hour of the first 28 kiln operating days (i.e., four values spanning 7 days each) of a 30 operating day period. The Hg concentration values for the hours of the last 2 days of the 30 operating day period will not be avai lable for calculating the emissions for the performance test period until at least five days after the end of the subject period.

(6) HCl Compliance. If you are subject to limitations on HCl emissions under § 63.1343(b), you must demonstrate initial compli ance with the HCl standards by using the performance test methods and procedures in § 63.1349(b)(6).

(i) For an affected source that is equipped with a wet scrubber, tray tower or dry scrubber, you may demonstrate initial compliance by conducting a perform ance test as specified in § 63.1349(b)(6)(i). You must determine the HCl concentration for each run and calculate the arithmetic average of the concentrations measured for the three runs to determine compliance. You must also establish appropriate site

- spe cific operational parameter limits.

(ii) For an affected source that is not equipped with a wet scrubber, tray tower or dry scrubber, you must demonstrate initial compliance by operating a CEMS as specified in § 63.1349(b)(6)(ii). You must use the average of the hourly HCl values obtained during the first 30 kiln operating days that occur after the compliance date of this rule to determine initial compliance.

(7) Commingled Exhaust Requirements. If the coal mill exhaust is commingled with kiln exhaust in a single stack, you may demonstrate compliance with the kiln emission limits by either:

(i) Performing required emissions monitoring and testing on the commingled coal mill and kiln exhaust, or

(ii) Perform required emission monitoring and testing of the
kil n exhaust prior to the reintroduction of the coal mill exhaust, and also testing the kiln exhaust diverted to the coal mill. All emissions must be added together for all emissionPage 40 of 106

points, and must not exceed the limit per each pollutant as listed in S63.134 3(b).

(b) Continuous Monitoring Requirements. You must demonstrate compliance with the emissions standards and operating limits by using the performance test methods and procedures in §§ 63.1350 and 63.8 for each affected source.

(1) General Requirements. (i) You must monitor and collect data according to § 63.1350 and the site

- specific monitoring plan required by § 63.1350(p).

(ii) Except for periods of startup and shutdown, monitoring system malfunctions, repairs associated with monitoring system
malfunct ions, and required monitoring system quality assurance or quality control activities (including, as applicable, calibration checks and required zero and span adjustments), you must operate the monitoring system and collect data at all required intervals at all times the affected source is operating.

(iii) You may not use data recorded during startup and shutdown, monitoring system malfunctions or repairs associated with monitoring system malfunctions in calculations used to report emissions or operating levels. A monitoring system malfunction is any sudden, infrequent, not reasonably preventable failure of the monitoring system to provide valid data. Monitoring system failures that are caused in part by poor maintenance or careless operation are not malfunctions. You must use all the data collected during all other periods in assessing the operation of the control device and associated control system.

(iv) Clinker Production. If you are subject to limitations on mercury emissions (lb/MM tons of clinker) under § 63.1343(b), you must determine the hourly production rate of clinker according to the requirements of § 63.1350(d).

(2) PM Compliance. If you are subject to limitations on PM emiss ions under § 63.1343(b), you must use the monitoring methods and procedures in § 63.1350(b) and (d).

(3) Opacity Compliance. If you are subject to the limitations on opacity under § 63.1345, you must demonstrate compliance using the monitoring methods and procedures in § 63.1350(f) based on the maximum 6

- minute average opacity exhibited during Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted:

,
Deleted: , or required monitoring system quality assurance or cont rol activitiesPage 41 of 106

the performance test period. You must initiate corrective actions within one hour of detecting visible emissions above the applicable limit.

(i) COMS. If you install a COMS in lieu of conducting the daily visible emissions testing, you must demonstrate compliance using a COMS such that it is installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the requirements of § 63.1350(f)(4)(i).

(ii) Bag leak determination system ( BLDS). If you install a BLDS on a raw mill or finish mill in lieu of conducting the daily visible emissions testing, you must demonstrate compliance using a BLDS that is installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the requirements of § 63.135 0(f)(4)(ii).

(4) D/F Compliance. If you are subject to a D/F emissions limitation under § 63.1343(b), you must demonstrate compliance using a CMS that is installed, operated and maintained to record the temperature of specified gas streams in accordance wi th the requirements of § 63.1350(g).

(5)(i) Activated Carbon Injection Compliance. If you use activated carbon injection to comply with the D/F emissions limitation under § 63.1343(b), you must demonstrate compliance using a CMS that is installed, operated , and maintained to record the rate of activated carbon injection in accordance with the requirements § 63.1350(h)(1).

(ii) If you use activated carbon injection to comply with the D/F emissions limitation under § 63.1343(b), you must demonstrate complianc e using a CMS that is installed, operated and maintained to record the activated carbon injection system gas parameter in accordance with the requirements of § 63.1350(h)(2).

(6) THC Compliance. (i) If you are subject to limitations on THC emissions under § 63.1343(b), you must demonstrate compliance using the monitoring methods and procedures in § 63.1350(i) and (j).

(ii) THC must be measured either upstream of the coal mill or in the coal mill stack.

(7) Mercury Compliance. (i) If you are subject to limit ations on mercury emissions in § 63.1343(b), you must demonstrate compliance using the monitoring methods and procedures inPage 42 of 106

§ 63.1350(k). If you use an integrated sorbent trap monitoring system to determine ongoing compliance, use the procedures described in § 63.1348(a)(5) to assign hourly mercury concentration values and to calculate rolling 30 operating day emissions rates. Since you assign the mercury concentration measured with the sorbent trap to each relevant hour respectively for each operating day of the integrated period, you may schedule the sorbent trap change periods to any time of the day (i.e., the sorbent trap replacement need not be scheduled at 12:00 midnight nor must the sorbent trap replacements occur only at integral 24

- hour intervals).

(ii) Mercury must be measured either upstream of the coal mill or in the coal mill stack.

(8) HCl Compliance. If you are subject to limitations on HCl emissions under § 63.1343(b), you must demonstrate compliance using the performance test methods and proc edures in § 63.1349(b)(6).

(i) For an affected source that is not equipped with a wet scrubber, tray tower or a dry sorbent injection system, you must demonstrate compliance using the monitoring methods and procedures in § 63.1350(l)(1).

(ii) For an affect ed source that is equipped with a wet scrubber, tray tower or a dry sorbent injection system, you may demonstrate compliance using the monitoring methods and procedures in § 63.1350(l)(2).

(iii) HCl may be measured either upstream of the coal mill or in th e coal mill stack.

(iv) As an alternative to paragraph (b)(8)(ii) of this section, you may use an SO 2 CEMS to establish an SO 2 operating level during your initial and repeat HCl performance tests and monitor the SO 2 level using the procedures in § 63.1350( l)(3).

(9) Startup and Shutdown Compliance. All dry sorbent and activated carbon systems that control hazardous air pollutants must be turned on and operating at the time the gas stream at the inlet to the baghouse or ESP reaches 300 degrees Fahrenheit (fi ve minute average) during startup

. Temperature of the gas stream is to be measured at the inlet of the baghouse or ESP every minute . Such injection systems can be turned off during shutdown. Particulate control and all remaining devices thatPage 43 of 106

control haza rdous air pollutants should be operational during startup and shutdown.

(c) Changes in operations. (1) If you plan to undertake a change in operations that may adversely affect compliance with an applicable standard, operating limit, or parametric monitoring value under this subpart, the source must conduct a performance test as specified in § 63.1349(b).

(2) In preparation for an d while conducting a performance test required in § 63.1349(b), you may operate under the planned operational change conditions for a period not to exceed 360 hours, provided that the conditions in (c)(2)(i) through (c)(2)(iv) of this section are met. You must submit temperature and other monitoring data that are recorded during the pretest operations.

(i) You must provide the Administrator written notice at least 60 days prior to undertaking an operational change that may adversely affect compliance with a n applicable standard under this subpart for any source, or as soon as practicable where 60 days advance notice is not feasible. Notice provided under this paragraph must include a description of the planned change, the emissions standards that may be affe cted by the change, and a schedule for completion of the performance test required under paragraph (c)(1) of this section, including when the planned operational change period would begin.

(ii) The performance test results must be documented in a test repo rt according to § 63.1349(a).

(iii) A test plan must be made available to the Administrator prior to performance testing, if requested.

(iv) The performance test must be completed within 360 hours after the planned operational change period begins.

(d) Gen eral duty to minimize emissions. At all times you must operate and maintain any affected source, including associated air pollution control equipment and monitoring equipment, in a manner consistent with safety and good air pollution control practices for minimizing emissions. Determination of whether such operation and maintenance procedures are being used will be based on information available to the Administrator which may Deleted: In order to demonstrate continuous compliance during startup and shutdown, all air pollution control devices must be operating.

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 ptPage 44 of 106

include, but is not limited to, monitoring results, review of operation and mainte nance procedures, review of operation and maintenance records, and inspection of the source.

[75 FR 55055, Sept. 9, 2010, as amended at 78 FR 10040, Feb. 12, 2013]

Monitoring and Compliance Provisions

§ 63.1349 Performance testing requirements.

(a) You must document performance test results in complete test reports that contain the information required by paragraphs (a)(1) through (10) of this section, as well as all other relevant information. As described in § 63.7(c)(2)(i), you must make available to the Administrator prior to testing, if requested, the site

- specific test plan to be followed during performance testing. For purposes of determining exhaust gas flow rate to the atmosphere from an alkali bypass stack or a coal mill stack, you must either install, operate, calibrate and maintain an instrument for continuously measuring and recording the exhaust gas flow rate according to the requirements in paragraphs § 63.1350(n)(1) through (10) of this subpart or use the maximum design exhaust gas flow ra te. For purposes of determining the combined emissions from kilns equipped with an alkali bypass or that exhaust kiln gases to a coal mill that exhausts through a separate stack, instead of installing a CEMS on the alkali bypass stack or coal mill stack, y ou may use the results of the initial and subsequent performance test to demonstrate compliance with the relevant emissions limit.

(1) A brief description of the process and the air pollution control system;

(2) Sampling location description(s);

(3) A desc ription of sampling and analytical procedures and any modifications to standard procedures;

(4) Test results;Page 45 of 106

(5) Quality assurance procedures and results;

(6) Records of operating conditions during the performance test, preparation of standards, and calib ration procedures;

(7) Raw data sheets for field sampling and field and laboratory analyses;

(8) Documentation of calculations;

(9) All data recorded and used to establish parameters for monitoring; and

(10) Any other information required by the performanc e test method.

(b)(1) PM emissions tests. The owner or operator of a kiln and clinker cooler subject to limitations on PM emissions shall demonstrate initial compliance by conducting a performance test using Method 5 or Method 5I at appendix A

- 3 to part 60 of this chapter. You must also monitor continuous performance through use of a PM continuous parametric monitoring system (PM CPMS).

(i) For your PM CPMS, you will establish a site

- specific operating limit. If your PM performance test demonstrates your

PM emission levels to be below 75 percent of your emission limit you will use the average PM CPMS value recorded during the PM compliance test, the milliamp equivalent of zero output from your PM CPMS, and the average PM result of your compliance test

to est ablish your operating limit. If your PM compliance test demonstrates your PM emission levels to be at or above 75 percent of your emission limit you will use the average PM CPMS value recorded during the PM compliance test to establish your operating limit . You will use the PM CPMS to demonstrate continuous compliance with your operating limit. You must repeat the performance test annually and reassess and adjust the site

specific operating limit in accordance with the results of the performance test.

(A) Y our PM CPMS must provide a 4

- 20 milliamp or digital signal output and the establishment of its relationship to manual reference method measurements must be determined in units of milliamps or the monitors digit al equivalent

.

(B) Your PM CPMS operati ng range must be capable of reading PM concentrations from zero to a level equivalent to three times Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted: ditigalPage 46 of 106

your allowable emission limit. If your PM CPMS is an auto

ranging instrument capable of multiple scales, the primary range of the instrument must be capabl e of reading PM concentration from zero to a level equivalent to three times your allowable emission limit.

(C) During the initial performance test or any such subsequent performance test that demonstrates compliance with the PM limit, record and average a ll milliamp or digital output values from the PM CPMS for the periods corresponding to the compliance test runs (e.g., average all your PM CPMS output values for three corresponding Method 5I test runs).

(ii) Determine your operating limit as specif ied in paragraphs (b)(1)(iii) through (iv) of this section. If your PM performance test demonstrates your PM emission levels to be below 75 percent of your emission limit you will use the average PM CPMS value recorded during the PM compliance test, the
mi lliamp or digital equivalent of zero output from your PM CPMS, and the average PM result of your compliance test to establish your operating limit. If your PM compliance test demonstrates your PM emission levels to be at or above 75 percent of your
emissi on limit you will use the average PM CPMS value recorded during the PM compliance test to establish your operating limit. You must verify an existing or establish a new operating limit after each repeated performance test. You must repeat the performance t est at least annually and reassess and adjust the site

- specific operating limit in accordance with the results of the performance test.

(iii) If the average of your three Method 5 or 5I compliance test runs is below 75 percent of your PM emission limit, yo u must calculate an operating limit by establishing a relationship of PM CPMS signal to PM concentration using the PM CPMS instrument zero, the average PM CPMS values corresponding to the three compliance test runs, and the average PM concentration
from th e Method 5 or 5I compliance test with the procedures in ( b )(1)(iii)(A) through (D) of this section.

(A) Determine your PM CPMS instrument zero output with one of the following procedures.

( 1 ) Zero point data for in

- situ instruments should be obtained by removing the instrument from the stack and monitoring ambient air on a test bench. Deleted: 2

- hour

Deleted:

Deleted: a

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 ptPage 47 of 106

( 2 ) Zero point data for extractive instruments should be obtained by removing the extractive probe from the stack and drawing in clean ambient air.

( 3 ) The zero point m ay also be established by performing manual reference method measurements when the flue gas is free of PM emissions or contains very low PM concentrations (e.g., when your process is not operating, but the fans are operating or your source is combusting on ly natural gas) and plotting these with the compliance data to find the zero intercept.

( 4 ) If none of the steps in paragraphs ( b )(1)(iii)(A)( 1 ) through ( 3 ) of this section are possible, you must use a zero output value provided by the manufacturer.

(B) Determine your PM CPMS instrument average in milliamps or digital signal , and the average of your corresponding three PM compliance test runs, using equation 3.

Where:

X 1 = The PM CPMS data points for the three runs constituting the performance test

.

Y 1 = The PM concentration value for the three runs constituting

the performance test.

n = The number of data points.

(C) With your instrument zero expressed in milliamps or a digital value , your three run average PM CPMS milliamp or digital sign al value, and your three run PM compliance test average, determine a relationship of lb/ton

- clinker per millia mp or digital signal value with Equation 4.

Where:

R = The relative lb/ton

- clinker per milliamp or digital signal

for your PM CPMS.

Y 1 = The t hree run average lb/ton

- clinker PM concentration. Deleted: a

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted: milliamp

Deleted: mp

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 ptPage 48 of 106

X 1 = The three run average milliamp or digital equivalent output

from you r PM CPMS.

z = The milliamp or digital equivalent of your instrument zero determined from (b)(1)(iii)(A).

(D) Determine your source s pecific 30

- day rolling average operating limit using the lb/ton

- clinker per milliamp or digital signal value from Equation 4 in Equation 5, below. This sets your operating limit at the PM CPMS output value corresponding to 75 percent of your emission limit

.

Where:

O l = The operating limit for your PM CPMS on a 30

- day rolling

average, in milliamps or the digital equivalent

. L = Your source emission limit expressed in lb/ton clinker.

z = Your instrument zero in milliamps, or digital equiva lent, determined from (b)(1)(iii)(A).

R = The relative lb/ton

- clinker per milliamp , or digital

equivalent, for your PM CPMS, from Equation 4.

(iv) If the average of your three PM compliance test runs is at or above 75 percent of your PM emission lim it you must determine your operating limit by averaging the PM CPMS milliamp or digital equivalent output corresponding to your three PM performance test runs that demonstrate compliance with the emission limit using Equation 6.

Where:

X 1 = The PM CPMS d ata points for all runs i.

n = The number of data points.

O h = Your site specific operating limit, in milliamps or the

digital equivalent

.

(v) To determine continuous operating compliance, you must record the PM CPMS output data for all periods when the pr ocess Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted: instrument zero

Deleted: a

Deleted: (1)(i).

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 ptPage 49 of 106

is operating, and use all the PM CPMS data for calculations when the source is not out

- of

- control. You must demonstrate continuous compliance by using all quality

- assured hourly average data collected by the PM CPMS for all operating hours to
calcula te the arithmetic average operating parameter in units of the operating limit (milliamps or the digital equivalent ) on a 30 operating day rolling average basis, updated at the end of each new kiln operating day. Use Equation 7 to determine the 30 kiln oper ating day average.

Where:

Hpvi = The hourly parameter value for hour i.

n = The number of valid hourly parameter values collected over

30 kiln operating days.

(vi) For each performance test, conduct at least three separate test runs each while the mill i s on and the mill is off, under the conditions that exist when the affected source is operating at the level reasonably expected to occur. Conduct each test run to collect a minimum sample volume of 2 dscm for determining complianc e with a new source limit and 1 dscm for determining compliance with an existing source limit. Calculate
the time weighted average of the results from three consecutive runs, including applicable sources as required by ( b)(1) (viii), to determine complian ce. You need not determine the particulate matter collected in the impingers (“back half”) of the Method 5 or Method 5I particulate sampling train to demonstrate compliance with the PM standards of this subpart. This shall not preclude the permitting autho rity from requiring a determination of the “back half” for other purposes.

(vii) For PM performance test reports used to set a PM CPMS operating limit, the electronic submission of the test report must also include the make and model of the PM CPMS instrum ent, serial number of the instrument, analytical principle of the instrument (e.g. beta attenuation), span of the instruments primary analytical range, milliamp value or digital signal equivalent to the instrument zero output, technique by which this zero value was determined, and the average milliamp signals corresponding to each PM compliance test run. Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted: highest load or capacity

Deleted: D

Deleted: )

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 ptPage 50 of 106

(viii) When there is an alkali bypass and/or an inline coal mill with a separate stack associated with a kiln, the main exhaust and alkali bypass and/or in line coal mill must be tested simultaneously and the combined emission rate of PM from the kiln and alkali bypass and/or inline coal mill must be computed for each run using Equation 8 of this section.

E Cm = E K + E B + E C

P (Eq. 8)

Where:

E C m = Combined hourly emission rate of PM from the kiln and bypass stack and/or inline coal mill, lb/ton of kiln clinker production.

E K = Hourly emissions of PM emissions from the kiln, lb.

E B = Hourly PM emissions from the alkali bypass stack, lb.

E C = Hourly PM emissions from the inline coal mill stack, lb.

P = Hourly clinker production, tons.

(ix) The owner or operator of a kiln with an in

- line raw mill and subject to limitations on PM emissions shall demonstrate initial compliance by conducting s eparate performance tests while the raw mill is under normal operating conditions and while the raw mill is not operating , and calculate the time weighted average emissions . The operating limit will then be determined using 63.1349(b) (1) ( i) of this section

.

(2) Opacity tests. If you are subject to limitations on opacity under this subpart, you must conduct opacity tests in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A

- 4 to part 60 of this chapter. The duration of the Method 9 performance test must be 3 hours (30 6

- minute averages), except that the duration of the Method 9 performance test may be reduced to 1 hour if the conditions of paragraphs (b)(2)(i) through (ii) of this section apply. For ba tch processes that are not run for 3

- hour periods or longer, compile observations totaling 3 hours when the unit is operating.

(i) There are no individual readings greater than 10 percent opacity; Deleted:

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: 12 pt

Formatted: Font: 12 pt

Formatted: Font: 12 pt

Formatted: Font: 12 pt

Formatted: Font: 12 pt

Formatted: Font: 12 pt

Formatted: Font: 12 pt

Formatted: Font: 12 pt

Formatted: Font: 12 pt

Formatted: Font: 12 pt

Formatted: Font: 12 pt

Formatted: Font: 12 pt

Formatted: Font: 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted:

. Deleted:

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted: The time weighted average cal culation must be computed using

Deleted: (b)(2)Page 51 of 106

(ii) There are no more than three readings of 10 percent fo r the first 1

- hour period.

(3) D/F Emissions Tests. If you are subject to limitations on D/F emissions under this subpart, you must conduct a performance test using Method 23 of appendix A

- 7 to part 60 of this chapter. If your kiln or in

- line kiln/raw mill is equipped with an alkali bypass, you must conduct simultaneous performance tests of the kiln or in

- line kiln/raw mill exhaust and the alkali bypass. You may conduct a performance test of the alkali bypass exhaust when the raw mill of the in

- line kiln/ra w mill is operating or not operating.

(i) Each performance test must consist of three separate runs conducted under representative conditions. The duration of each run must be at least 3 hours, and the sample volume for each run must be at least 2.5 dscm ( 90 dscf).

(ii) The temperature at the inlet to the kiln or in

- line kiln/raw mill PMCD, and, where applicable, the temperature at the inlet to the alkali bypass PMCD must be continuously recorded during the period of the Method 23 test, and the continuous t emperature record(s) must be included in the performance test report.

(iii) A verage temperatures must be calculated for each run of the performance test.

(iv) The run average temperature must be calculated for each run, and the average of the run a verage temperatures must be determined and included in the performance test report and will determine the applicable temperature limit in accordance with § 63.1343(b), footnote 2.

(v)(A) If sorbent injection is used for D/F control, you must

rec ord the rate of sorbent injection to the kiln exhaust, and where applicable, the rate of sorbent injection to the alkali bypass exhaust, continuously during the period of the Method 23 test in accordance with the conditions in § 63.1350(m)(9), and include the continuous injection rate record(s) in the performance test report. Determine the sorbent injection rate parameters in accordance with paragraphs (b)(3)(vi) of this section. Deleted: Hourly

Deleted: a

Deleted: 63.1344(b).

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 ptPage 52 of 106

(B) Include the brand and type of sorbent used during the performance test in the performance test report.

(C) Maintain a continuous record of either the carrier gas flow rate or the carrier gas pressure drop for the duration of the performance test. If the carrier gas flow rate is used, determine, record, and maintain a record of t he accuracy of the carrier gas flow rate monitoring system according to the procedures in appendix A to part 75 of this chapter. If the carrier gas pressure drop is used, determine, record, and maintain a record of the accuracy of the carrier gas pressure drop monitoring system according to the procedures in § 63.1350(m)(6).

(vi) Calculate the run average sorbent injection rate for each run and determine and include the average of the run average injection rates in the performance test report and determine the applicable injection rate limit in accordance with § 63.1346(c)(1).

(4) THC emissions test. (i) If you are subject to limitations on THC emissions, you must operate a CEMS in accordance with the requirements in § 63.1350(i). For the purposes of conduct ing the accuracy and quality assurance evaluations for CEMS, the THC span value (as propane) is 50 ppmvd and the reference method (RM) is Method 25A of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter.

(ii) Use the THC CEMS to conduct the initial compliance test
for the first 30 kiln operating days of kiln operation after the compliance date of the rule. See 63.1348(a).

(iii) If kiln gases are diverted through an alkali bypass or to a coal mill and exhausted through a separate stack, you must calculate a kiln

- specific THC limit using Equation 9:

C ks = ( MACT Limit x ( Qab + Qcm + Q ks ) )

− ( Qab x Cab )

− ( Qcm x Ccm )
Qks (Eq. 9)

Where:

Cks = Kiln stack concentration (ppmvd).

Qab = Alkali bypass flow rate (volume/hr). Formatted: Font: 12 pt

Formatted: Centered

Formatted: Font: 12 pt

Formatted: Font: 12 pt

Formatted: Font: 12 pt

Formatted: Font: 12 pt

Formatted: Font: 12 pt Formatted: Font: 12 pt Deleted: + Q ab + Q cm ) ﷧

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted:

Formatted: Font: (Default) Cambria Math, 12 pt, Italic

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 ptPage 53 of 106

Cab = A lkali bypass concentration (ppmvd).

Qcm = Coal mill flow rate (volume/hr).

Ccm = Coal mill concentration (ppmvd).

Qks = Kiln stack flow rate (volume/hr).

(iv) THC must be measured either upstream of the coal mill or the coal mill stack.

(v) Instead of cond ucting the performance test specified in paragraph (b)(4)of this section, you may conduct a performance test to determine emissions of total organic HAP by following the procedures in paragraphs (b)(7) of this section.

(5) Mercury Emissions Tests. If you a re subject to limitations on mercury emissions, you must operate a mercury CEMS or a sorbent trap monitoring system in accordance with the requirements of § 63.1350(k). The initial compliance test must be based on the first 30 kiln operating days in which the affected source operates using a mercury CEMS or a sorbent trap monitoring system after the compliance date of the rule. See § 63.1348(a).

(i) If you are using a mercury CEMS or a sorbent trap monitoring system, you must install, operate, calibrate, an d maintain an instrument for continuously measuring and recording the exhaust gas flow rate to the atmosphere according to the requirements in § 63.1350(k)(5).

(ii) Calculate the emission rate using Equation 10 of this section:

Where:

E 30D = 30

- day rolli ng emission rate of mercury, lb/MM tons

clinker.

C i = Concentration of mercury for operating hour i, μg/scm. Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 ptPage 54 of 106

Q i = Volumetric flow rate of effluent gas for operating hour i,
where C i and Q i are on the same basis (either wet or dry), scm/hr.

k = Conversion f actor, 1 lb/454,000,000 μg.

n = Number of kiln operating hours in the previous 30 kiln

operating day period where both C and Qi qualified data are available.

P = Total runs from the previous 30 days of clinker production during the same time period as t he mercury emissions measured, million tons.

(6) HCl emissions tests. For a source subject to limitations on HCl emissions you must conduct performance testing by one of the following methods:

(i)(A) If the source is equipped with a wet scrubber, tray

towe r or dry scrubber, you must conduct performance testing using Method 321 of appendix A to this part unless you have installed a CEMS that meets the requirements § 63.1350(l)(1). For kilns with inline raw mills, testing should be conducted for the raw mill on and raw mill off conditions.

(B) You must establish site specific parameter limits by using the CPMS required in § 63.1350(l)(1). For a wet scrubber or tray tower, measure and record the pressure drop across the scrubber and/or liquid flow rate and pH i n intervals of no more than 15 minutes during the HCl test. Compute and record the 24

- hour average pressure drop, pH, and average scrubber water flow rate for each sampling run in which the applicable emissions limit is met. For a dry scrubber, measure and record the sorbent injection rate in intervals of no more than 15 minutes during the HCl test. Compute and record the 24

- hour average sorbent injection rate and average sorbent injection rate for each sampling run in which the applicable emissions limit i s met.

(ii)(A) If the source is not controlled by a wet scrubber, tray tower or dry sorbent injection system, you must operate a CEMS in accordance with the requirements of § 63.1350(l)(1). See § 63.1348(a).

(B) The initial compliance test must be based on the 30 kiln operating days that occur after the compliance date of this rule in which the affected source operates using a HCl CEMS. Hourly Deleted: a

Deleted:

.Page 55 of 106

HCl concentration data must be obtained according to § 63.1350(l).

(iii) As an alternative to paragraph (b)(6)(i)(B ) of this section, you may choose to monitor SO 2 emissions using a CEMS in accordance with the requirements of § 63.1350(l)(3). You must establish an SO 2 operating limit equal to the average recorded during the HCl stack test where the HCl s tack test run result demonstrates compliance with the emission limit . This operating limit will apply only for demonstrating HCl compliance.

(iv) If kiln gases are diverted through an alkali bypass or to a coal mill and exhausted through a separate stack, you must calculate a kiln

- specific HCl limit using Equation 11:

Cks = ( MACT Limit x ( Qab + Qcm + Qks ) )

− ( Qab x Cab )

− ( Qcm x Ccm )
Qks (Eq. 11)

Where:

Cks = Kiln stack concentration (ppmvd).

Qab = Alkali by pass flow rate (volume/hr).

Cab = Alkali bypass concentration (ppmvd).

Qcm = Coal mill flow rate (volume/hr).

Ccm = Coal mill concentration (ppmvd).

Qks = Kiln stack flow rate (volume/hr).

(7) Total Organic HAP Emissions Tests. Instead of conducting the pe rformance test specified in paragraph ( b )(4) of this section, you may conduct a performance test to determine emissions of total organic HAP by following the procedures in paragraphs ( b )(7)(i) through (v) of this section.

(i) Use Method 320 of appendix A to this part, Method 18 of Appendix A of part 60, ASTM D6348

- 03 or a combination to determine emissions of total organic HAP. Each performance test must consist of three separate runs under the conditions that exist when the affected source is operating a t the representative performance conditions in accordance with § 63.7(e). Each run must be conducted for at least 1 hour. Deleted: highest 1 hour

Formatted: Font: 12 pt

Formatted: Font: 12 pt

Formatted: Font: 12 pt

Formatted: Font: 12 pt

Formatted: Font: 12 pt

Formatted: Font: 12 pt Formatted: Font: 12 pt Deleted: + Qab + Qcm ) ﷧

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted:

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted: a

Deleted: aPage 56 of 106

(ii) At the same time that you are conducting the performance test for total organic HAP, you must also determine a site

specific THC emissions limit by operating a THC CEMS in accordance with the requirements of § 63.1350(j). The duration of the performance test must be at least 3 hours and the average THC concentration (as calculated from the recorded output ) during th e 3

- hour test must be calculated. You must establish your THC operating limit and determine compliance with it according to paragraphs ( b )(7)(vii)through (viii)of this section. It is permissible to extend the testing time of the organic HAP performance te st if you believe extended testing is required to adequately capture organic HAP and/ or THC variability over time.

(iii) If your source has an in

- line kiln/raw mill you must
use the fraction of time the raw mill is on and the fraction of
time that the raw mill is off and calculate this limit as a weighted average of the THC levels measured during three raw mill on and three raw mill off test s

.

(iv) If your organic HAP emissions are below 75 percent of the organic HAP standard and you determine your oper ating limit with paragraph (b)(7)(vii) of this section your THC CEMS must be calibrated and operated on a measurement scale no greater than 180 ppmvw, as carbon, or 60 ppmvw as propane.

(v) If your kiln h as an inline coal mill and/or an alkali bypass with separate stacks, you are required to measure and
account for o HAP emissions from their separate stacks. Y ou are required to measure o HAP at the coal mill inlet, and you must
also measure oHAP at the alkali bypass outlet. You must th en calculate a flo w weighted average oHAP concentration for all emission sources including the inline coal mill and the alkali bypass.

(v i ) Your THC CEMS measurement scale must be capable of reading TH C concentrations from zero to a level equivalent to two times your highest THC emissions average determined during your performance test, including mill on or mill off operation.

N OTE : This may require the use of a dual range instrument to meet this requir ement and paragraph (b)(7)(iv) of this section.

(vi i ) Determine your operating limit as specified in paragraphs ( b )(7)(vii i ) and ( ix ) of this section. If your organic HAP performance test demonstrates your average organic HAP emission levels are below 75 percent of your emission limit Deleted: 1

- minute

Deleted: averages

Deleted: a

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted: ing

Deleted: , and y

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted: coal mill inlet

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted: , you must also measure oHAP at the coal mil inlet and

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted: a

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted: viii

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 ptPage 57 of 106

(9 ppmv) you will use the average THC value recorded during the organic HAP performance test, and the average total organic HAP result of your performance test to establish your operating limit. If your organic HAP compli ance test results demonstrate
that your average organic HAP emission levels are at or above 75 percent of your emission limit, your operating limit is established as the average THC value recorded during the organic HAP performance test. You must establish a new operating limit after each performance test. You must repeat the performance test no later than 30 months following your last performance test and reassess and adjust the site

- specific operating limit in accordance with the results of the performanc e test.

(v i ii) If the average organic HAP results for your three Method 18 and/or Method 320 performance test runs are below 75 percent of your organic HAP emission limit, you must calculate an operating limit by establishing a relationship of THC CEMS sig nal to the organic HAP concentration using the average THC CEMS value corresponding to the three organic HAP compliance test runs and the average organic HAP total concentration from the Method 18 and/or Method 320 performance test runs with the procedures in ( b )(7)(vii i )(A) and (B) of this section.

(A) Determine the THC CEMS average values in ppmvw, and the average of your corresponding three total organic HAP compliance test runs, using Equation 12.

Where:

x̅= The THC CEMS average values in ppmvw.

Xi= The THC CEMS data points for all three runs i.

Yi= The sum of organic HAP concentrations for test runs i. and

n = The number of data points.

(B) You must use your three run average THC CEMS value and your three run average organic HAP concentrati on from your three Method 18 and/or Method 320 compliance tests to determine the operating limit. Use equation 13 to determine your operating limit in units of ppmvw THC, as propane. Deleted: a

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted: value , and

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 ptPage 58 of 106

Where:

T l = The 30

- day operating limit for your THC CEMS, ppmvw.

Y 1 = T he average organic HAP concentration from Eq. 12, ppmv d

.

X 1 = The average THC CEMS concentration from Eq. 12, ppmvw.

( ix ) If the average of your three organic HAP performance

test runs is at or above 75 percent of your organic HAP emission limit, you m ust determine your operating limit using Equation 14 by averaging the THC CEMS output values corresponding to your three organic HAP performance test runs that demonstrate compliance with the emission limit. If your new THC CEMS value is below your current operating limit, you may opt to retain your current operating limit, but you must still submit all performance test and THC CEMS data according to the reporting requirements in paragraph (d)(1) of this section.

Where:

X1 = The THC CEMS data points for a ll runs i.

n = The number of data points.

T h = Your site specific operating limit, in ppmvw THC.

( x) If your kiln has an inline kiln/raw mill, you must conduct separate performance tests while the raw mill is

o perating (“mill on”) and while the raw mill is not operating (“mill off”). Using the fraction of time the raw mill is on and the fraction of time that the raw mill is off, calculate this limit as a weighted average of the THC levels measured during
raw mil l on and raw mill off compliance testing with Equation
15.

Where:

R = Operating limit as THC, ppmvw.

y = Average THC CEMS value during mill on operations, ppmvw.

t = Percentage of operating time with mill on. Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted: viii

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted: Y1 = The organic HAP total value for runs i. ¶

Deleted: i

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 ptPage 59 of 106

x = Average THC CEMS value during mill off op erations, ppmvw.

(1

- t) = Percentage of operating time with mill off.

(x i ) To determine continuous compliance with the THC operating limit, you must record the THC CEMS output data for all periods when the process is operating and the THC CEMS is

not out

- of

- control. You must demonstrate continuous compliance by using all quality

- assured hourly average data collected by the THC CEMS for all operating hours to calculate the arithmetic average operating parameter in units of the operating limit (ppmvw) on a 30 operating day rolling average basis, updated at the end of each new kiln operating day. Use Equation 16 to determine the 30 kiln operating day average.

Where:

Hpvi = The hourly parameter value for hour i, ppmvw.

n = The number of valid hourly parameter v alues collected over

30 kiln operating days.

(x i i) Use EPA Method 18 or Method 320 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter to determine organic HAP emissions. For each performance test, conduct at least three separate runs under the conditions that exist when the affected source is operating at
the level reasonably expected to occur. If your source has an in

- line kiln/raw mill you must conduct three separate test runs with the raw mill on, and three separate runs under the conditio ns that exist when the affected source is operating at
the level reasonably expected to occur with the mill off. Conduct each Method 18 test run to collect a minimum target sample equivalent to three times the method detection limi t. Calculate the average of the results from three runs to determine compliance.

(xi i i) If the THC level exceeds by 10 percent or more your site

- specific THC emissions limit, you must

(A) As soon as possible but no later than 30 days after the exceedance, conduct an inspection and take corrective action to Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted: highest load or capacity

Deleted: highest load or capacityPage 60 of 106

return the THC CEMS measurements to within the established value; and

(B) Within 90 days of the exceedance or at the time of the 30
month compliance test, whichever comes first, conduct another

per formance test to determine compliance with the organic HAP limit and to verify or re

- establish your site

- specific THC emissions limit.

(8) HCl Emissions Tests with SO 2 Monitoring. If you choose to monitor SO 2 emissions using a CEMS to demonstrate HCl compl iance, follow the procedures in (b)(8)(i) through (ix) of this section and in accordance with the requirements of § 63.1350(l)(3). You must establish an SO 2 operating limit equal to the average recorded during the HCl stack test

. . This operating limit will apply only for demonstrating HCl compliance.

(i) Use Method 321 of appendix A to this part to determine emissions of HCl. Each performan ce test must consist of three separate runs under the conditions that exist when the affected source is operating at the representative performance conditions in accordance with § 63.7(e). Each run must be conducted for at
least one hour.

(ii) At the same time that you are conducting the performance test for HCl, you must also determine a site

specific SO 2 emissions limit by operating an SO 2 CEMS in accordance with the requirements of § 63.1350(l). The duration of the performance test must be three hours a nd the average SO 2 concentration (as calculated from the average output ) during the
3

- hour test must be calculated. You must establish your SO 2 operating limit and determine compliance with it according to paragraphs (b)(8)(vii) and (viii) of this section.

(iii) If your source has an in

- line kiln/raw mill you must
use the fraction of time the raw mill is on and the fraction of time that the raw mill is off and calculate this limit as a weighted average of the SO 2 levels measured during raw m ill on and raw mill off testing.

(iv) Your SO 2 CEMS must be calibrated and operated according to the requirements of § 60.63(f). Deleted: annual

Deleted: You must establish an SO 2 operating limit equal to the average of the SO 2 emissions recorded during the HCl stack test

Deleted: 1

- minute averagesPage 61 of 106

(v) Your SO 2 CEMS measurement scale must be capable of reading SO 2 concentrations consistent with the requirements of § 60.63(f ), including mill on or mill off operation.

(vi) If your kiln has an inline kiln/raw mill, you must conduct separate performance tests while the raw mill is operating (“mill on”) and while the raw mill is not operating (“mill off”). Using the fraction of t ime the raw mill is on and the fraction of time that the raw mill is off, calculate this limit as a weighted average of the HCl levels measured during raw mill on and raw mill off compliance testing with Equation
17.

Where:

R = Operating limit as SO 2 , ppmvw.

y = Average SO 2 CEMS value during mill on operations, ppmvw.

t = Percentage of operating time with mill on, expressed as a decimal.

x = Average SO 2 CEMS value during mill off operations, ppmvw.

t−1 = Percentage of operating time with mill off, ex pressed as a decimal.

(vii) If the average of your three HCl compliance test runs is below 75 percent of your HCl emission limit, you may as a compliance alternative, calculate an operating limit by establishing a relationship of SO 2 CEMS signal to y our HCl concentration corrected to 7% O 2 by using the SO 2 CEMS instrument zero, the average SO 2 CEMS values corresponding to the three compliance test runs, and the average HCl concentration from the HCl compliance test with the procedures in ( b )(1)(iii)( A) through (D) of this section.

(A) Determine your SO 2 CEMS instrument zero output with one of the following procedures.

( 1 ) Zero point data for in

- situ instruments should be obtained by removing the instrument from the stack and monitoring ambient air o n a test bench. Deleted: THC

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted: must

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted: a

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 ptPage 62 of 106

( 2 ) Zero point data for extractive instruments may be obtained by removing the extractive probe from the stack and drawing in clean ambient air.

( 3 ) The zero point may also be established by performing probe

- flood introduction of high p urity nitrogen or certified zero air free of SO 2 .

( 4 ) If none of the steps in paragraphs (a)(1)(iii)(A)( 1 ) through ( 3 ) of this section are possible, you must use a zero output value provided by the manufacturer.

(B) Determine your SO 2 CEMS instrument average ppm, and the average of your corresponding three HCl compliance test runs, using equation 18.

x = 1

n ∑ X 1 n

i = 1 , y = 1

n ∑ Y 1 n

i = 1
(Eq. 18)

Where:

X 1 = The SO 2 CEMS data points for the three runs constituting the perfor mance test.

Y 1 = The HCl emission concentration expressed as ppmv corrected

to 7% O 2 for the three runs constituting the performance

test.

n = The number of data points.

(C) With your instrument zero expressed in ppmv, your three run average SO 2 CEMS expre ssed in ppmv, and your three run HCl compliance test average in ppm corrected to 7% O 2 , determine a relationship of ppm HCl corrected to 7% O 2 per ppm SO 2 with Equation 19.

R = Y 1 ( X 1 − z )

(Eq. 19)

Where: Formatted: Font: 12 pt

Formatted: Font: 12 pt, (Intl) Cambria Math

Formatted: Font: 12 pt, (Intl) Cambria Math

Formatted: Font: 12 pt

Formatted: Font: 12 pt

Formatted: Font: 12 pt

Formatted: Font: 12 pt

Formatted: Font: 12 pt, (Intl) Cambria Math

Formatted: Font: 12 pt, (Intl) Cambria Math

Formatted: Font: 12 pt

Formatted: Font: 12 pt, (Intl) Cambria Math

Formatted: Font: 12 pt, (Intl) Cambria Math

Formatted: Font: 12 pt

Formatted: Font: 12 pt

Formatted: Font: 12 pt

Formatted: Font: 12 pt

Formatted: Font: 12 pt, (Intl) Cambria Math

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: 12 pt

Formatted: Font: 12 pt

Formatted: Font: 12 pt, (Intl) Cambria Math

Formatted: Font: 12 pt

Formatted: Font: 12 pt, (Intl) Cambria Math

Formatted: Font: 12 pt, (Intl) Cambria Math

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 ptPage 63 of 106

R = The relative HCl ppmv corrected to 7% O 2 per ppm SO2 for your

SO 2 CEMS.

Y 1 = The three run average HCl concentration corrected to 7% O 2 .

X 1 = The three run average ppm recorded by your SO 2 CEMS.

z = The instrum ent zero output ppm value.

(D) Determine your source specific 30

- day rolling average operating limit using ppm HCl corrected to 7% O 2 per ppm SO 2 value from Equation 19 in Equation 20, below. This sets your operating limit at the SO 2 CEMS ppm value corres ponding to 75 percent of your emission limit.

O 1 = z + 0

. 75 ( L )

R

(Eq. 20)

Where:

O l = The operating limit for your SO 2 CEMS on a 30

- day rolling

average, in ppmv.

L = Your source HCl emission limit expressed in ppmv corrected

to 7% O 2 .
z = Your instrument zero in ppmv, determined from (1)(i).

R = The relative oxygen corrected ppmv HCl per ppmv SO 2 , for

your SO 2 CEMS, from Equation 19.

(vii i ) To determine continuous compliance with the SO 2 operating limit, you must record the SO 2 CEMS output data for all periods when the process is operating and th e SO 2 CEMS is

not out

- of

- control. You must demonstrate continuous compliance by using all quality

- assured hourly average data collected by
the SO 2 CEMS for all operating hours to calculate the arithmetic average operating parameter in units of the operatin g limit (ppmvw) on a 30 operating day rolling average basis, updated at the end of each new kiln operating day. Use Equation 21 to determine the 30 kiln operating day average. Formatted: Font: 12 pt

Formatted: Font: 12 pt, (Intl) Cambria Math

Formatted: Font: 12 pt, (Intl) Cambria Math

Formatted: Font: 12 pt, (Intl) Cambria Math

Formatted: Font: 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted: 18

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted:

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 ptPage 64 of 106 30 kiln operating day = ∑ Hpvi n i = 1

n
(Eq. 21 )

Whe re:

Hpvi = The hourly parameter value for hour i, ppmvw.

n = The number of valid hourly parameter values collected over

30 kiln operating days.

( ix ) Use EPA Method 321 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter to determine HCl emissions. For each perfor mance test, conduct at least three separate runs under the conditions that exist when the affected source is operating at the level reasonably expected to occur. If your source has an in

- line kiln/raw mill you must conduct three se parate test runs with the raw mill on, and three separate runs under the conditions that exist when the affected source is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur with the mill
off.

( x) If the SO 2 level exceeds by 10 p ercent or more your site

specific SO 2 emissions limit, you must

(A) As soon as possible but no later than 30 days after the exceedance, conduct an inspection and take corrective action to
return the SO 2 CEMS measurements to within the established
value. an d

(B) Within 90 days of the exceedance or at the time of the periodic compliance test, whichever comes first, conduct another performance test to determine compliance with the HCl limit and to verify or re

- establish your site

- specific SO 2 em issions limit.

(c) Performance Test Frequency. Except as provided in § 63.1348(b), performance tests are required at regular intervals for affected sources that are subject to a dioxin, organic HAP or HCl emissions limit

. Pe rformance test s required every 30 months must be complete d between 29 and 31 calendar
month s after the previous performance test except where that specific pollutant is monitored using CEMS ; performance tests required every 12 months must be completed within 11 to 13
calendar months after the previous performance test. Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted: viii

Deleted: highest load or capacity

Deleted: i

Deleted: annual

Deleted: peroidic

Deleted: and

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted: r e p e a t e d every 30

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted: for

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted: s

Deleted: where that specific pollutant

Deleted:

. Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted: Tests

Deleted: for PM are repeated every 12 months

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted:

. Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 ptPage 65 of 106

(d) Pe rformance Test Reporting Requirements. (1) You must submit the information specified in paragraphs (d)(1) and (2) of this section no later than 60 days following the initial performance test. All reports must be signed by a responsible official.

(i) The in itial performance test data as recorded under paragraph (b) of this section.

(ii) The values for the site

- specific operating limits or parameters established pursuant to paragraphs (b)(1), (3), (6), and (7) of this section, as applicable, and a description , including sample calculations, of how the operating parameters were established during the initial performance test.

(2) As of December 31, 2011 and within 60 days after the date of completing each performance evaluation or test, as defined in § 63.2, co nducted to demonstrate compliance with any standard covered by this subpart, you must submit the relative accuracy test audit data and performance test data, except opacity data, to the EPA by successfully submitting the data electronically to
the EPA's Ce ntral Data Exchange (CDX) by using the Electronic Reporting Tool(ERT) (see http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ert/ert_tool.html/ ).

(e) Conditions of performance tests. Conduct performance tests under such conditions as the Administrator specifies to
the owner o r operator based on representative performance of the affected source for the period being tested. Upon request, you must make available to the Administrator such records as may be necessary to determine the conditions of performance tests.

[75 FR 55057, S ept. 9, 2010, as amended at 78 FR 10040, Feb. 12, 2013]

§ 63.1350 Monitoring requirements.

(a)(1) Following the compliance date, the owner or operator must demonstrate compliance with this subpart on a continuous basis by meeting the requirements of thi s section.

(2) Reserved

. Deleted: All continuous monitoring data for periods of startup and shutdown must be compiled and averaged separately from data gathered during other operating periods.Page 66 of 106

(3) For each existing unit that is equipped with a CMS, maintain the aver age emissions or the operating parameter values within the operating parameter limits established through performance tests.

(4) Any instance where the owner or operator fails to comply with the continuous monitoring requirements of this section is a viola tion.

(b) PM monitoring requirements. (1)(i) PM CPMS. You will use a PM CPMS to establish a site

- specific operating limit corresponding to the results of the performance test demonstrating compliance with the PM limit. You will conduct your performance tes t using Method 5 or Method 5I at appendix A

3 to part 60 of this chapter. You will use the PM CPMS to demonstrate continuous compliance with this operating limit. You must repeat the performance test annually and reassess and adjust the site

- specific opera ting limit in accordance with the results of the performance test using the procedures in § 63.1349(b)(1) (i) through (vi) of this subpart. You must also repeat the test if you change the analytical range of the instrument, or if you replace the instrument itself or any principle analytical component of the instrument that would alter the relationship of output signal to in

- stack PM concentration.

(ii) To determine continuous compliance, you must use the PM CPMS output data for all periods when the process is operating and the PM CPMS is not out

- of

- control. You must demonstrate continuous compliance by using all quality

- assured hourly average data collected by the PM CPMS for all operating hours to calculate the arithmetic average operating parameter in unit s of the operating limit (milliamps) on a 30 operating day rolling average basis, updated at the end of each new kiln operating day.

(iii) For any exceedance of the 30 process operating day PM CPMS average value from the established operating parameter
lim it, you must:

(A) Within 48 hours of the exceedance, visually inspect the APCD;

(B) If inspection of the APCD identifies the cause of the exceedance, take corrective action as soon as possible andPage 67 of 106

return the PM CPMS measurement to within the established va lue;
and

(C) Within 30 days of the exceedance or at the time of the annual compliance test, whichever comes first, conduct a PM emissions compliance test to determine compliance with the PM emissions limit and to verify or re

- establish the PM CPMS operatin g limit within 45 days. You are not required to conduct additional testing for any exceedances that occur between the time of the original exceedance and the PM emissions compliance test required under this paragraph.

(iv) PM CPMS exceedances leading to mo re than four required performance tests in a 12

- month process operating period (rolling monthly) constitute a presumptive violation of this subpart.

(2) [Reserved]

(c) [Reserved]

(d) Clinker production monitoring requirements. In order to determine clinker production, you must:

(1) Determine hourly clinker production by one of two
methods:

(i) Install, calibrate, maintain, and operate a permanent weigh scale system to measure and record weight rates in tons

mass per hour of the amount of clinker produced. T he system of measuring hourly clinker production must be maintained within ±5 percent accuracy, or

(ii) Install, calibrate, maintain, and operate a permanent weigh scale system to measure and record weight rates in tons

mass per hour of the amount of feed to the kiln. The system of measuring feed must be maintained within ±5 percent accuracy. Calculate your hourly clinker production rate using a kiln

specific feed to clinker ratio based on reconciled clinker production determined for accounting purposes and recorded feed rates. Update this ratio monthly. Note that if this ratio changes at clinker reconciliation, you must use the new ratio going forward, but you do not have to retroactively change clinker production rates previously estimated.Page 68 of 10 6

(iii) [Reserved ]

(2) Determine, record, and maintain a record of the accuracy of the system of measuring hourly clinker production (or feed mass flow if applicable) before initial use (for new sources) or by the effective compliance date of this rule (for existing

source s). During each quarter of source operation, you must determine, record, and maintain a record of the ongoing accuracy of the system of measuring hourly clinker production (or feed mass flow).

(3) If you measure clinker production directly, record the dail y clinker production rates; if you measure the kiln feed rates and calculate clinker production, record the hourly kiln feed and clinker production rates.

(4) Develop an emissions monitoring plan in accordance with paragraphs (p)(1) through (p)(4) of this section.

(e) [Reserved]

(f) Opacity monitoring requirements. If you are subject to a limitation on opacity under § 63.1345, you must conduct required opacity monitoring in accordance with the provisions of paragraphs (f)(1)(i) through (vii) of this section and in accordance with your monitoring plan developed under § 63.1350(p). You must also develop an opacity monitoring plan in accordance with paragraphs (p)(1) through (4) and paragraph (o)(5), if applicable, of this section.

(1)(i) You must conduct a mon thly 10

- minute visible emissions test of each affected source in accordance with Method 22 of appendix A

- 7 to part 60 of this chapter. The performance test must be conducted while the affected source is in operation.

(ii) If no visible emissions are observ ed in six consecutive monthly tests for any affected source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of performance testing from monthly to semi

- annually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any semi

- annual test, you must resume performance testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests.

(iii) If no visible emissions are observed during the semi

annual test for any a ffected source, you may decrease thePage 69 of 106

frequency of performance testing from semi

- annually to annually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any annual performance test, the owner or operator must resume performance testing of th at affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests.

(iv) If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 performance test, of appendix A

- 7 to part 60 of this chap ter, you must conduct 30 minutes of opacity observations, recorded at
15

- second intervals, in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A

- 4 to part 60 of this chapter. The Method 9 performance test, of appendix A

- 4 to part 60 of this chapter, must begin within 1 hour of any observation of visible emissions.

(v) Any totally enclosed conveying system transfer point, regardless of the location of the transfer point is not required to conduct Method 22 visible emissions monitoring under this paragraph. The enclosure s for these transfer points must be operated and maintained as total enclosures on a continuing basis in accordance with the facility operations and maintenance plan.

(vi) If any partially enclosed or unenclosed conveying system transfer point is located i n a building, you must conduct a Method 22 performance test, of appendix A

- 7 to part 60 of this chapter, according to the requirements of paragraphs (f)(1)(i) through (iv) of this section for each such conveying system transfer point located within the bui lding, or for the building itself, according to paragraph (f)(1)(vii) of this section.

(vii) If visible emissions from a building are monitored, the requirements of paragraphs (f)(1)(i) through (f)(1)(iv) of this section apply to the monitoring of the buil ding, and you must also test visible emissions from each side, roof, and vent of the building for at least 10 minutes.

(2)(i) For a raw mill or finish mill, you must monitor opacity by conducting daily visible emissions observations of the mill sweep and a ir separator PM control devices (PMCD) of these affected sources in accordance with the procedures of Method 22 of appendix A

- 7 to part 60 of this chapter. The duration of the Method 22 performance test must be 6 minutes.

(ii) Within 24 hours of the end of the Method 22 performance test in which visible emissions were observed, the owner orPage 70 of 106

operator must conduct a follow up Method 22 performance test of each stack from which visible emissions were observed during the previous Method 22 performance test.

(ii i) If visible emissions are observed during the follow

- up Method 22 performance test required by paragraph (f)(2)(ii) of this section from any stack from which visible emissions were observed during the previous Method 22 performance test required by parag raph (f)(2)(i) of the section, you must then conduct an opacity test of each stack from which emissions were observed during the follow up Method 22 performance test in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A

- 4 to part 60 of this chapter. The duration of th e Method 9 test must be 30 minutes.

(3) If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 visible emissions test conducted under paragraphs (f)(1) or (2) of this section, you must initiate, within one

- hour, the corrective actions specified in your ope ration and maintenance plan as required in § 63.1347.

(4) The requirements under paragraph (f)(2) of this section to conduct daily Method 22 testing do not apply to any specific raw mill or finish mill equipped with a COMS or BLDS.

(i) If the owner or oper ator chooses to install a COMS in lieu of conducting the daily visible emissions testing required under paragraph (f)(2) of this section, then the COMS must be installed at the outlet of the PM control device of the raw mill or finish mill and the COMS mus t be installed, maintained, calibrated, and operated as required by the general provisions in subpart A of this part and according to PS

- 1 of appendix B to part 60 of this chapter.

(ii) If you choose to install a BLDS in lieu of conducting the daily visibl e emissions testing required under paragraph (f)(2) of this section, the requirements in paragraphs (m)(1) through (m)(4), (m)(10) and (m)(11) of this section apply.

(g) D/F monitoring requirements. If you are subject to an emissions limitation on D/F emis sions, you must comply with the monitoring requirements of paragraphs (g)(1) through (g)(6) and paragraphs (m)(1) through (m)(4) of this section to demonstrate continuous compliance with the D/F emissions standard. You must also develop an emissions monito ring plan in accordance with paragraphs (p)(1) through (p)(4) of this section.Page 71 of 106

(1) You must install, calibrate, maintain, and continuously operate a CMS to record the temperature of the exhaust gases from the kiln and alkali bypass, if applicable, at the i nlet to, or upstream of, the kiln and/or alkali bypass PMCDs.

(i) The temperature recorder response range must include zero and 1.5 times the average temperature established according to the requirements in § 63.1349(b)(3)(iv).

(ii) The calibration referen ce for the temperature measurement must be a National Institute of Standards and Technology calibrated reference thermocouple

- potentiometer system or alternate reference, subject to approval by the Administrator.

(iii) The calibration of all thermocouples and other temperature sensors must be verified at least once every three
months.

(2) You must monitor and continuously record the temperature of the exhaust gases from the kiln and alkali bypass, if applicable, at the inlet to the kiln and/or alkali bypass PMCD.

(3) The required minimum data collection frequency must be one minute.

(4) Calculate the rolling three

- hour average temperature using the average of 180 successive one

- minute average temperatures. See § 63.1349(b)(3).

(5) When the operating status o f the raw mill of the in

- line kiln/raw mill is changed from off to on or from on to off, the
calculation of the three

- hour rolling average temperature must begin anew, without considering previous recordings.

(h) Monitoring requirements for sources using s orbent injection. If you are subject to an operating limit on D/F emissions that employs carbon injection as an emission control technique, you must comply with the additional monitoring requirements of paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(2) and paragraphs (m)(1) th rough (m)(4) and (m)(9) of this section. You must also develop an emissions monitoring plan in accordance with paragraphs (p)(1) through (p)(4) of this section.

(1) Install, operate, calibrate, and maintain a continuous monitor to record the rate of activa ted carbon injection. ThePage 72 of 106

accuracy of the rate measurement device must be ±1 percent of the rate being measured.

(i) Verify the calibration of the device at least once every
three months.

(ii) Each hour, calculate the three

- hour rolling average activated c arbon injection rate for the previous three hours of process operation. See § 63.1349(b)(3).

(iii) When the operating status of the raw mill of the in

line kiln/raw mill is changed from off to on or from on to off,
the calculation of the three

- hour rolling average activated carbon injection rate must begin anew, without considering previous recordings.

(2)(i) Install, operate, calibrate, and maintain a continuous monitor to record the activated carbon injection system carrier gas parameter (either the carri er gas flow rate or the carrier gas pressure drop) established during the D/F performance test in accordance with § 63.1349(b)(3).

(ii) Each hour, calculate the three

- hour rolling average of the selected parameter value for the previous 3 hours of process operation using all of the one

- minute data available ( i.e., the CMS is not out

- of

- control.)

(i) THC Monitoring Requirements. If you are subject to an emissions limitation on THC emissions, you must comply with the monitoring requirements of paragraphs (i) (1) and (i)(2) and (m)(1) through (m)(4) of this section. You must also develop an emissions monitoring plan in accordance with paragraphs (p)(1) through (p)(4) of this section.

(1) You must install, operate, and maintain a THC continuous emission monitori ng system in accordance with Performance Specification 8 or Performance Specification 8A of appendix B to part 60 of this chapter and comply with all of the requirements for continuous monitoring systems found in the general provisions, subpart A of this p art. The owner or operator must operate and maintain each CEMS according to the quality assurance requirements in Procedure 1 of appendix F in part 60 of this chapter. For THC continuous emission monitoring systems certified under Performance Specification 8A, conduct the relative accuracy test audits required under Procedure 1 in accordance with Performance Specification 8, Sections 8 and 11Page 73 of 106

using Method 25A in appendix A to 40 CFR part 60 as the reference method; the relative accuracy must meet the criter ia of Performance Specification 8, Section 13.2.

(2) Performance tests on alkali bypass and coal mill stacks must be conducted using Method 25A in appendix A to 40 CFR part 60 and repeated every 30 months

.

(j) Total organic HAP monitoring requirem ents. If you are complying with the total organic HAP emissions limits, you must continuously monitor THC according to paragraph (i)(1) and (2) or in accordance with Performance Specification 8 or Performance Specification 8A of appendix B to part 60 of this chapter and comply with all of the requirements for continuous monitoring systems found in the general provisions, subpart A of this part. You must operate and maintain each CEMS according to the quality assurance requirements in Procedure 1 of appen dix F in part 60 of this chapter. In addition, your must follow the monitoring requirements in paragraphs (m)(1) through (4) of this section. You must also develop an emissions monitoring plan in accordance with paragraphs (p)(1) through (4) of this section.

(k) Mercury Monitoring Requirements. If you have a kiln subject to an emissions limitation on mercury emissions, you must install and operate a mercury continuous emissions monitoring system (Hg CEMS) in accordance with Performance Specification 12A (PS 12A) of appendix B to part 60 of this chapter or an integrated sorbent trap monitoring system in accordance with Performance Specification 12B (PS 12B) of appendix B to part 60 of this chapter. You must monitor mercury continuously according to par agraphs (k)(1) through (5) of this section. You must also develop an emissions monitoring plan in accordance with paragraphs (p)(1) through (4) of this section.

(1) You must use a span value for any Hg CEMS that represents the mercury concentration corresp onding to approximately two times the emissions standard and may be rounded up to the nearest multiple of 5 μg/m 3 of total mercury or higher level if necessary to include Hg concentrations which may occur (excluding concentrations during in

- line raw “mill off” operation). As specified in PS 12A, Section 6.1.1, the data recorder output range must include the full range of expected Hg concentration values which would include those expected during “mill off” conditions. Engineering judgments made and
calculati ons used to determine the corresponding span Deleted: annually.

Deleted: 15

Deleted: (m)

Deleted: (p)

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 ptPage 74 of 106

concentration from the emission standard shall be documented in the site

- specific monitoring plan and associated records.

(2) In order to quality assure data measured above the span value, you must use one of th e three options in paragraphs (k)(2)(i) thr ough (ii i ) of this section. Where the options in paragraphs (k)(2)(i) or (k)(2)(iii) of this section are employed while the kiln is operating in a mill

- off mode, the above span calibration standard may sub stitute for a daily upscale calibration value provided the data normalization processes in paragraph (k)(2)(iii) of this section are not required. If data normalization is required the normal daily CEMS high value check must be performed to QA/QC the oper ation of the CEMS for that day. Adjustments to CEMS normally required by Procedure 5 when daily upscale values are off by 5% or more are exempted in this rule, unless (k)(2)(iii) of this section data normalization is necessary and a subsequent normal dail y calibration check demonstrates the need for such adjustment.

(i) Include a second span that encompasses the Hg emission concentrations expected to be encountered during “mill off” conditions. This second span may be rounded to a multiple of 5 μg/m 3 o f total mercury. The requirements of PS 12A, shall be followed for this second span with the exception that a RATA with the mill off is not required.

(ii) Quality a ssure any data above the span value by proving instrument linearity beyond the span value e stablished in paragraph (k)(1) of this section using the following procedure. Conduct a weekly “above span linearity ” calibration challenge of the monitoring system using a reference gas with a certified value greater than your highest expected hourly

con centration or greater than 75% of the highest measured hourly concentration. The “above span” reference gas must meet the requirements of PS 12A, Section 7.1 and must be introduced to the measurement system at the probe. Record and report the
results of this procedure as you would for a daily calibration. The “above span linearity” challenge is successful if the value measured by the Hg CEMS falls within 10 percent of the certified value of the reference gas. If the value measured by the Hg CEMS during t he above span linearity challenge exceeds +/

- 10 percent of the certified value of the reference gas, the monitoring system must be evaluated and repaired and a new “above span linearity” challenge met before returning the Hg CEMS to service, or data above span from the Hg CEMS must be subject to
the quality assur ance procedure s established in (k)(2)(iii) of Formatted: Indent: First line: 0.47", Line spacing: single

Deleted: two

Deleted: and Commented [SMJ5]: This has become three options instead of two, per our discussion on Thursday afternoon.

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted: ¶

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Indent: First line: 0.47", Line spacing: singlePage 75 of 106

this section

. In this manner values measured by the Hg CEMS during the above span linearity challenge exceeding +/

- 20% of the certified value of the re ference gas must be normalized using Equation 22.

(ii i ) Quality assure any data above the span value established in paragraph (k)(1) of this section using the following procedure. Any time two consecutive one

- hour average measured concentration of Hg exceeds the span value you must, withi n 24 hours before or after, introduce a higher, “above span” Hg reference gas standard to the Hg CEMS. The “above span” reference gas must meet the requirements of PS 12A, Section 7.1,

must target a concentration level between 50 and 150 percent of
th e highest expected hourly concentration measured during the period of measurements above span, and must be introduced at the probe. While this target represents a desired concentration range that is not always achievable in practice it is expected
that the intent to meet this range is demonstrated by the value of the reference gas. Expected values may include above span calibrations done before or after the above

- span measurement period. Record and report the results of this procedure as you
would for a da ily calibration. The “above span” calibration is successful if the value measured by the Hg CEMS is within 20 percent of the certified value of the reference gas. If the value measured by the Hg CEMS exceeds 20 percent of the certified value of the referen ce gas, then you must normalize
the one

- hour average stack gas values measured above the span during the 24

- hour period preceding or following the “above span” calibration for reporting based on the Hg CEMS response to the reference gas as shown in equatio n 22 :

Certified reference gas value

Measured value of reference gas x Measured stack gas result

= Normalized stack gas result ( Eq

. 22 )

Onl Onl y one `abo ve span' calibration is needed per 24 hour period. If the `above span' calibration is conducted during the period when measured emissions are above span and there is a failure to
collect the one data point in an hour due to the calibration duration, then y ou must determine the emissions average for that missed hour as the average of hourly averages for the hour preceding the missed hour and the hour following the missed
hour. In an hour where an ‘above span’ calibration is being
conducted and one or more d ata points are collected, the emissions average is represented by the average of all valid data points collected in that hour. Deleted: calibration c halleng e of the monitoring system using with a reference

gas certified with a certified calibration
value greater t han your highest expected hourly concentration

. The “above span” reference gas must meet the requirements of PS 12A, Section 7.1 and must be introduced to the measurement system at the probe. Record and report the results of this procedure as you would for a daily calibration. The “above span linearity” challenge is successful if the value measured by the Hg CEMS falls within 10 percent of the certified value of the reference gas. If the value measured by the Hg CEMS during the above span linearity challenge exceeds 10 percent of the certified value of the reference gas , the

m oni toring easurement system must be evaluated
and repaired and a new “above span linearity” challenge met before returning the Hg
CEMS instrument to service, or data above span
from the Hg CEMS instrument must be quality assured using the procedure established i n (k)(2)(iii). ¶

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted: be of

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted: 19

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Indent: Left: -0.3", Hanging: 0.33", Line spacing: single

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 ptPage 76 of 106

(3) You must operate and maintain each Hg CEMS or an integrated sorbent trap monitoring system according to the quality assuranc e requirements in Procedure 5 of appendix F to part 60 of this chapter. During the RATA of integrated sorbent trap monitoring systems required under Procedure 5, you may apply the appropriate exception for sorbent trap section 2 breakthrough in (k)(3)(i) t hrough (iv) of this section:

(i) For stack Hg concentrations >1 μg/dscm, ≤10% of section 1

mass;

(ii) For stack Hg concentrations ≤1 μg/dscm and >0.5 μg/dscm, ≤20% of section 1 mass;

(iii) For stack Hg concentrations ≤0.5 μg/dscm and >0.1 μg/dscm, ≤50% of section 1 mass; and

(iv) For stack Hg concentrations ≤0.1 μg/dscm, no breakthrough criterion assuming all other QA/QC specifications

are met.

(4) Relative accuracy testing of mercury monitoring systems under PS 12A, PS 12B, or Procedure 5 must be conducted at normal operating conditions. If a facility has an inline raw mill, the testing must occur with the raw mill on.

(5) If you use a Hg CEMS or an integrated sorbent trap monitoring system, you must install, operate, calibrate, and maintain an instrument f or continuously measuring and recording the exhaust gas flow rate to the atmosphere according to the requirements in paragraphs (n)(1) through (10) of this section. If kiln gases are diverted through an alkali bypass or to a coal mill and exhausted through separate stacks, you must account for the mercury emitted from those stacks by following the procedures in (k)(5)(i) through (iv) of this section:

(i) Develop a mercury hourly mass emissions rate by conducting performance tests annually, within 11 to 13 calendar months after the previous performance test , using Method 29, or Method 30B, to measure the concentration of mercury in the gases exhausted from the alkali bypass and coal mill.

(ii) On a continuous basis, determine the mass emissions of

mer cury in lb/hr from the alkali bypass and coal mill exhausts by using the mercury hourly emissions rate, the exhaust gas flow Deleted: ¶

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted: annual

Deleted:

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 ptPage 77 of 106

rate and hourly mercury emission rate to calculate hourly mercury emissions in lb/hr.

(iii) Sum the hourly mercury emissions from t he kiln, alkali bypass and coal mill to determine total mercury emissions. Using hourly clinker production, calculate the hourly emissions rate in pounds per ton of clinker to determine your 30 day rolling

average.

(iv) If mercury emissions from the coal m ill and alkali bypass are below the method detection limit for two consecutive annual performance tests, you may reduce the frequency of the performance tests of coal mills and alkali bypasses to once every 30 months. If the measured mercury concentration exceeds the method detection limit, you must revert to testing annually until two consecutive annual tests are below the method detection limit.

(6) If you operate an integrated sorbent trap monitoring system conforming to PS 12B, you may use a monitoring period at least 24 hours but no longer than 168 hours in length. You should use a monitoring period that is a multiple of 24 hours (except during relative accuracy testing as allowed in PS 12B).

(l) HCl Monitoring Requirements. If you are subject to an emi ssions limitation on HCl emissions in § 63.1343, you must monitor HCl emissions continuously according to paragraph (l)(1) or (2) and paragraphs (m)(1) through (4) of this section or, if your kiln is controlled using a wet or dry scrubber or tray tower, yo u alternatively may parametrically monitor SO 2 emissions continuously according to paragraph (l)(3) of this section. You must also develop an emissions monitoring plan in accordance with paragraphs (p)(1) through (4) of this section.

(1) If you monito r compliance with the HCl emissions limit by operating an HCl CEMS, you must do so in accordance with Performance Specification 15 (PS 15) of appendix B to part 60 of this chapter, or, upon promulgation, in accordance with any other performance specificati on for HCl CEMS in appendix B to part 60 of this chapter. You must operate, maintain, and quality assure a HCl CEMS installed and certified under PS 15 according to the quality assurance requirements in Procedure 1 of appendix F to part 60 of this chapter except that the Relative Accuracy Test Audit requirements of Procedure 1 must be replaced with the validation requirements and criteria of sections 11.1.1 and 12.0
of PS 15. When promulgated, i f you choose to install and operate Deleted:Page 78 of 106

an HC l CEMS in accordance w ith PS 18 of appendix B to part 60 of this chapter, you must operate, maintain and quality assure the HCl CEMS using the associated Procedure 6 of appendix F to part 60 of this chapter. For any performance specification that you

use, y ou must use Method 32 1 of appendix A to part 63 of this chapter as the reference test method for conducting relative accuracy testing. The span value and calibration requirements in paragraphs (l)(1)(i) and (ii) of this section apply to all HCl
CEMS used under this subpart

.

(i) You must use a measurement span value for any HCl CEMS of 0

- 10 ppmvw unless the monitor is installed on a kiln without an inline raw mill

. Kilns without an inline raw mill may use a higher span value sufficient to quantify all expected emission s concentrations. The HCl CEMS data recorder output range must include the full range of expected HCl concentration values which would include those expected during ‘‘mill off’’
conditions. The corresponding data recorder range shall be documented in the site

- specific monitoring plan and associated
records.

(ii) In order to quality assure data measured above the span value, you must use one of the three options in paragraphs (l)(1)(ii)(A) through ( C ) of this section.

(A) Include a second span that encompasses the HCl emission concentrations expected to be encountered during “mill off” conditions. This second span may be rounded to a multiple of 5

ppm of total HCl. The requirements of the appropriate HCl monitor performance specification shall be followed for this second sp an with the exception that a RATA with the mill off is not required.

(B) Quality assure any data above the span value by proving instrument linearity beyond the span value established in paragraph ( l )(1) (i) of this section using the following procedur e. Conduct a weekly “above span linearity” calibration challenge of the monitoring system using a reference gas with a certified value greater than your highest expected hourly concentration or greater than 75% of the highest measured hourly concentration . The “above span” reference gas must meet the requirements of the applicable performance specification and must be introduced to the measurement system at the probe. Record and report the results of this procedure as you would for a daily calibration. The “above span linearity” challenge is successful if the value measured by the HCl CEMS falls within 10 Deleted:

.

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted: You must use a span value for any HCl CEMS that represents the intended upper limit of the HCl concentration measurement range during normal inline raw “mill on” operation. The span value should be a c oncentration equivalent to approximately two times the emissions standard and it may be rounded to the nearest multiple of 5 ppm of HCl. The HCl CEMS data recorder output range must include the full range of expected HCl concentration values which would in clude those expected during “mill off” conditions. Engineering judgments made and calculations used to determine the corresponding span concentration from the emission standard shall be documented in the site

- specific monitoring plan and associated records

. ¶

Deleted: two

Deleted: and

Deleted: B

Formatted: Normal, No bullets or numbering Deleted: (A)

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted: μg/m 3

Deleted: specification,

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Indent: First line: 0", Space Before: 0 pt, After: 0 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted: I

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 ptPage 79 of 106

percent of the certified value of the reference gas. If the value measured by the HCl CEMS during the above span linearity challenge exceeds 10 perce nt of the certified value of the reference gas, the monitoring system must be evaluated and repaired and a new “above span linearity” challenge met before returning the HCl CEMS to service, or data above span from the
HCl CEMS must be subject to the qualit y assurance procedures established in ( l )(1)( D ) of this section . In this manner values measured by the HCl CEMS during the above span linearity challenge exceeding +/

- 20 percent of the certified value of the reference gas must be normalized using Equation 23.

( C ) Quality assure any data above the span value established in paragraph (1)(1)(i) of this section using the following procedure. Any time two consecutive one

- hour aver age

measur ed concentration of HCl exceeds the span value you must, within 24 hours before or after, introduce a higher, “above span” H Cl reference gas standard to the HCl CEMS. The “ above

span ” reference gas must meet the requirements of the applicable performance s pecification and target a concentration level
between 50 and 1 5 0 percent of the highest expected hourly concentration measured during the period of measurements above span, and must be introduced at the probe . While this target represents a desired concent ration range that is not always achievable in practice, it is expected that the intent to meet this range is demonstrated by the value of the reference gas. Expected values may include above span calibrations done before
or after the above

- span measurement period. Record and report the results of this procedure as you would for a daily calibration. The `above span' calibration is successful if the value measured by the HCl CEMS is within 20 percent of the certified value of the reference gas. If the value measured by the HCl CEMS is not within 20 percent of the certified value of the reference gas, then you must normalize the stack gas values measured above span as described in paragraph ( l)(1)(ii)( D ) of this section. If the “ above span ” calibration is conducted during the period when measured emissions are above span and
there is a failure to collect the one data point in an hour due to the calibration d uration, then you must determine the emissions average for that missed hour as the average of hourly averages for the hour preceding the missed hour and the hour following the missed hour. In an hour where an “above span” calibration is being conducted and one or more data points are collected, the emissions average is represented by the average of all valid data points collected in that hour. Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font:

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted: be quality assured using the procedure established in ( I )( 1 )( C ). ¶

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt Deleted: B

Deleted: Any time the average measured concentration of HCl exceeds or is expected to exceed the span value for greater than two hours you must, within a period 24 hours before or after the `above span' period, introduce a higher, `above span' HCl reference gas standard to the HCl CEMS. The `above span' reference gas must meet the requirements of the applicable performance specification and
be of target a concentration level between 50 and 100 percent of the highest expected hourly concentration measured duri ng the period of measurements above span, and must be introduced at the probe.

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted: C

Deleted: below.

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted: `

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt Deleted: '

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted: required minimum number of

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted: s

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 ptPage 80 of 106

( D ) In the event that the `above span' calibration is not successful (i.e., the HCl CEMS measured value is not wit hin 20 percent of the certified value of the reference gas), then you must normalize the one

- hour average stack gas values measured above the span during the 24

- hour period preceding or following the `above span' calibration for reporting based on the HCl CEMS response to the reference gas as shown in Equation 23 :

Certified reference gas value

Measured value of reference gas x Measured stack gas result

= Normalized stack gas result ( Eq

. 23 )

Only one `above span' calibration is needed per 24

- hour period.

(2) Install, operate, and maintain a CMS to monitor wet scrubber or tray tower parameters, as specified in paragraphs (m)(5) and (7) of this section, and dry scrubber, as specified in paragraph (m)(9) of thi s section.

(3) If the source is equipped with a wet or dry scrubber or tray tower, and you choose to monitor SO 2 emissions, monitor SO 2 emissions continuously according to the requirements of § 60.63(e) through (f) of part 60 subpart F of this chapter. If
SO 2 levels increase above the 30

- day rolling average SO 2 operating limit established during your performance test, you

must:

(i) As soon as possible but no later than 48 hours after you exceed the established SO 2 value conduct an inspection and take

correc tive action to return the SO 2 emissions to within the operating limit; and

(ii) Within 60 days of the exceedance or at the time of the next compliance test, whichever comes first, conduct an HCl emissions compliance test to determine compliance with the HC l emissions limit and to verify or re

- establish the SO 2 CEMS operating limit.

(m) Parameter monitoring requirements. If you have an operating limit that requires the use of a CMS, you must install, operate, and maintain each continuous parameter monitorin g system (CPMS) according to the procedures in paragraphs (m)(1) through (4) of this section by the compliance date specified in § 63.1351. You must also meet the applicable Deleted: C

Deleted: 20

Deleted:

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 ptPage 81 of 106

specific parameter monitoring requirements in paragraphs (m)(5) through (11) that are applicable to you.

(1) The CMS must complete a minimum of one cycle of operation for each successive 15

- minute period. You must have a minimum of four successive cycles of operation to have a valid hour of
data.

(2) You must conduct all monitoring in c ontinuous operation at all times that the unit is operating.

(3) Determine the 1

- hour block average of all recorded readings.

(4) Record the results of each inspection, calibration, and validation check.

(5) Liquid flow rate monitoring requirements. If you have an operating limit that requires the use of a flow measurement device, you must meet the requirements in paragraphs (m)(5)(i) through (iv) of this section.

(i) Locate the flow sensor and other necessary equipment in a position that provides a represe ntative flow.

(ii) Use a flow sensor with a measurement sensitivity of 2 percent of the flow rate.

(iii) Reduce swirling flow or abnormal velocity distributions due to upstream and downstream disturbances.

(iv) Conduct a flow sensor calibration check at le ast semiannually.

(6) Specific pressure monitoring requirements. If you have an operating limit that requires the use of a pressure measurement device, you must meet the requirements in paragraphs (m)(6)(i) through (vi) of this section.

(i) Locate the pres sure sensor(s) in a position that provides a representative measurement of the pressure.

(ii) Minimize or eliminate pulsating pressure, vibration, and internal and external corrosion.Page 82 of 106

(iii) Use a gauge with a minimum tolerance of 1.27 centimeters of water or a transducer with a minimum tolerance of 1 percent of the pressure range.

(iv) Check pressure tap pluggage daily.

(v) Using a manometer, check gauge calibration quarterly and transducer calibration monthly.

(vi) Conduct calibration checks any time the s ensor exceeds the manufacturer's specified maximum operating pressure range or install a new pressure sensor.

(7) Specific pH monitoring requirements. If you have an operating limit that requires the use of a pH measurement device, you must meet the requir ements in paragraphs (m)(7)(i) through (iii) of this section.

(i) Locate the pH sensor in a position that provides a representative measurement of wet scrubber or tray tower effluent pH.

(ii) Ensure the sample is properly mixed and representative
of the fl uid to be measured.

(iii) Check the pH meter's calibration on at least two points every 8 hours of process operation.

(8) [Reserved]

(9) Mass flow rate (for sorbent injection) monitoring requirements. If you have an operating limit that requires the
use of equipment to monitor sorbent injection rate ( e.g., weigh belt, weigh hopper, or hopper flow measurement device), you must meet the requirements in paragraphs (m)(9)(i) through (iii) of this section. These requirements also apply to the sorbent injection equipment of a dry scrubber.

(i) Locate the device in a position(s) that provides a representative measurement of the total sorbent injection rate.

(ii) Install and calibrate the device in accordance with manufacturer's procedures and specifications.Page 83 of 106

(iii) At least annually, calibrate the device in accordance with the manufacturer's procedures and specifications.

(10) Bag leak detection monitoring requirements. If you elect to use a fabric filter bag leak detection system to comply with the requirements of this subpart, you must install, calibrate, maintain, and continuously operate a BLDS as specified in paragraphs (m)(10)(i) through (viii) of this section.

(i) You must install and operate a BLDS for each exhaust stack of the fabric filter.

(ii) Each BLDS m ust be installed, operated, calibrated, and
maintained in a manner consistent with the manufacturer's written specifications and recommendations and in accordance with the guidance provided in EPA

- 454/R

- 98

- 015, September 1997.

(iii) The BLDS must be certif ied by the manufacturer to be capable of detecting PM emissions at concentrations of 10 or fewer milligrams per actual cubic meter.

(iv) The BLDS sensor must provide output of relative or absolute PM loadings.

(v) The BLDS must be equipped with a device to continuously record the output signal from the sensor.

(vi) The BLDS must be equipped with an alarm system that will alert an operator automatically when an increase in relative PM emissions over a preset level is detected. The alarm must be
located such that the alert is detected and recognized easily by an operator.

(vii) For positive pressure fabric filter systems that do not duct all compartments of cells to a common stack, a BLDS must be installed in each baghouse compartment or cell.

(viii) Where mul tiple bag leak detectors are required, the system's instrumentation and alarm may be shared among
detectors.

(11) For each BLDS, the owner or operator must initiate procedures to determine the cause of every alarm within 8 hours
of the alarm. The owner or operator must alleviate the cause of the alarm within 24 hours of the alarm by taking whateverPage 84 of 106

corrective action(s) are necessary. Corrective actions may include, but are not limited to the following:

(i) Inspecting the fabric filter for air leaks, torn or broken bags or filter media, or any other condition that may cause an increase in PM emissions;

(ii) Sealing off defective bags or filter media;

(iii) Replacing defective bags or filter media or otherwise repairing the control device;

(iv) Sealing off a d efective fabric filter compartment;

(v) Cleaning the BLDS probe or otherwise repairing the BLDS;

or

(vi) Shutting down the process producing the PM emissions.

(n) Continuous Flow Rate Monitoring System. You must install, operate, calibrate, and maintain in struments, according to the requirements in paragraphs (n)(1) through (10) of this section, for continuously measuring and recording the stack gas flow rate to allow determination of the pollutant mass emissions rate to the atmosphere from sources subject to an emissions limitation that has a pounds per ton of clinker unit and that is required to be monitored by a CEMS.

(1) You must install each sensor of the flow rate monitoring system in a location that provides representative measurement of the exhaust g as flow rate at the sampling location of the

mercury CEMS, taking into account the manufacturer's recommendations. The flow rate sensor is that portion of the system that senses the volumetric flow rate and generates an output proportional to that fl ow rate.

(2) The flow rate monitoring system must be designed to measure the exhaust flow rate over a range that extends from a value of at least 20 percent less than the lowest expected exhaust flow rate to a value of at least 20 percent greater than
the highest expected exhaust flow rate.

(3) [Reserved]

(4) The flow rate monitoring system must be equipped with a data acquisition and recording system that is capable of Deleted: or PMPage 85 of 106

recording values over the entire range specified in paragraph (n)( 2 ) of this section.

( 5) The signal conditioner, wiring, power supply, and data acquisition and recording system for the flow rate monitoring system must be compatible with the output signal of the flow rate sensors used in the monitoring system.

(6) The flow rate monitoring sy stem must be designed to complete a minimum of one cycle of operation for each successive
15

- minute period.

(7) The flow rate sensor must have provisions to determine the daily zero and upscale calibration drift (CD) ( see sections
3.1 and 8.3 of Performan ce Specification 2 in appendix B to Part 60 of this chapter for a discussion of CD).

(i) Conduct the CD tests at two reference signal levels, zero (e.g., 0 to 20 percent of span) and upscale (e.g., 50 to 70 percent of span).

(ii) The absolute value of the difference between the flow monitor response and the reference signal must be equal to or less than 3 percent of the flow monitor span.

(8) You must perform an initial relative accuracy test of the flow rate monitoring system according to Section 8.2 of

Pe rformance Specification 6 of appendix B to part 60 of the chapter with the exceptions in paragraphs (n)(8)(i) and (n)(8)(ii) of this section.

(i) The relative accuracy test is to evaluate the flow rate monitoring system alone rather than a continuous emiss ion rate monitoring system.

(ii) The relative accuracy of the flow rate monitoring system shall be no greater than 10 percent of the mean value of the
reference method data.

(9) You must verify the accuracy of the flow rate monitoring system at least once per year by repeating the relative accuracy test specified in paragraph (n)(8).

(10) You must operate the flow rate monitoring system and record data during all periods of operation of the affected facility including periods of startup, shutdown, and Deleted: 1

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 ptPage 86 of 106

malfu nction, except for periods of monitoring system malfunctions, repairs associated with monitoring system malfunctions, and required monitoring system quality assurance or quality control activities (including, as applicable, calibration checks and required zero and span adjustments).

(o) Alternate monitoring requirements approval. You may submit an application to the Administrator for approval of alternate monitoring requirements to demonstrate compliance with the emission standards of this subpart, subject to the provisions of paragraphs (o)(1) through (6) of this section.

(1) The Administrator will not approve averaging periods other than those specified in this section, unless you document, using data or information, that the longer averaging period will ensure that emissions do not exceed levels achieved during the performance test over any increment of time equivalent to the time required to conduct three runs of the performance test.

(2) If the application to use an alternate monitoring requirement is approved, you must continue to use the original monitoring requirement until approval is received to use another monitoring requirement.

(3) You must submit the application for approval of alternate monitoring requireme nts no later than the notification of performance test. The application must contain the information specified in paragraphs ( o )(3)(i) through (iii) of this section:

(i) Data or information justifying the request, such as the technical or economic infeasi bility, or the impracticality of using the required approach;

(ii) A description of the proposed alternative monitoring requirement, including the operating parameter to be monitored, the monitoring approach and technique, the averaging period for the limi t, and how the limit is to be calculated; and

(iii) Data or information documenting that the alternative monitoring requirement would provide equivalent or better assurance of compliance with the relevant emission standard.

(4) The Administrator will notif y you of the approval or denial of the application within 90 calendar days after receipt of the original request, or within 60 calendar days of the receipt of any supplementary information, whichever is later. Deleted: except f or emission standards for THC,

Deleted: mPage 87 of 106

The Administrator will not approve an alternat e monitoring application unless it would provide equivalent or better assurance of compliance with the relevant emission standard. Before disapproving any alternate monitoring application, the Administrator will provide:

(i) Notice of the information and f indings upon which the intended disapproval is based; and

(ii) Notice of opportunity for you to present additional supporting information before final action is taken on the application. This notice will specify how much additional time is allowed for you to provide additional supporting information.

(5) You are responsible for submitting any supporting information in a timely manner to enable the Administrator to consider the application prior to the performance test. Neither submittal of an application, n or the Administrator's failure to approve or disapprove the application relieves you of the responsibility to comply with any provision of this subpart.

(6) The Administrator may decide at any time, on a case

- by

case basis that additional or alternative op erating limits, or alternative approaches to establishing operating limits, are necessary to demonstrate compliance with the emission standards of this subpart.

(p) Development and submittal (upon request) of monitoring plans. If you demonstrate compliance with any applicable emissions limit through performance stack testing or other emissions monitoring, you must develop a site

- specific monitoring plan according to the requirements in paragraphs (p)(1) through (4) of this section. This requirement also

app lies to you if you petition the EPA Administrator for alternative monitoring parameters under paragraph (o) of this section and § 63.8(f). If you use a BLDS, you must also meet the requirements specified in paragraph (p)(5) of this section.

(1) For each CM S required in this section, you must develop, and submit to the permitting authority for approval upon request, a site

- specific monitoring plan that addresses paragraphs (p)(1)(i) through (iii) of this section. You must submit this site

- specific monitoring plan, if requested, at least 30 days before your initial performance evaluation of your
CMS.Page 88 of 106

(i) Installation of the CMS sampling probe or other interface at a measurement location relative to each affected process unit such that the measurement is repres entative of control of the exhaust emissions (e.g., on or downstream of the last control device);

(ii) Performance and equipment specifications for the sample interface, the pollutant concentration or parametric signal analyzer, and the data collection and reduction systems; and

(iii) Performance evaluation procedures and acceptance criteria (e.g., calibrations).

(2) In your site

- specific monitoring plan, you must also address paragraphs (p)(2)(i) through (iii) of this section.

(i) Ongoing operation and mai ntenance procedures in accordance with the general requirements of § 63.8(c)(1), (c)(3), and (c)(4)(ii);

(ii) Ongoing data quality assurance procedures in accordance with the general requirements of § 63.8(d); and

(iii) Ongoing recordkeeping and reporting procedures in accordance with the general requirements of § 63.10(c), (e)(1), and (e)(2)(i).

(3) You must conduct a performance evaluation of each CMS in accordance with your site

- specific monitoring plan.

(4) You must operate and maintain the CMS in conti nuous operation according to the site

- specific monitoring plan.

(5) BLDS monitoring plan. Each monitoring plan must describe the items in paragraphs (p)(5)(i) through (v) of this section. At a minimum, you must retain records related to the site

specific m onitoring plan and information discussed in paragraphs (m)(1) through (4), (m)(10) and (11) of this section for a period of 5 years, with at least the first 2 years on

- site;

(i) Installation of the BLDS;

(ii) Initial and periodic adjustment of the BLDS, in cluding
how the alarm set

- point will be established;Page 89 of 106

(iii) Operation of the BLDS, including quality assurance procedures;

(iv) How the BLDS will be maintained, including a routine maintenance schedule and spare parts inventory list;

(v) How the BLDS output will be recorded and stored.

[75 FR 55059, Sept. 9, 2010, as amended at 76 FR 2836, Jan. 18, 2011; 78 FR 10048, Feb. 12, 2013]

§ 63.1351 Compliance dates.

(a) The compliance date for any affected existing source subject to any rule requirements that wer e in effect before December 20, 2006, is:

(1) June 14, 2002, for sources that commenced construction before or on March 24, 1998, or

(2) June 14, 1999 or startup for sources that commenced construction after March 24, 1998.

(b) The compliance date for any affected existing source subject to any rule requirements that became effective on December 20, 2006, is:

(1) December 21, 2009, for sources that commenced construction after December 2, 2005 and before or on December 20, 2006, or

(2) Startup for sources t hat commenced construction after December 20, 2006.

(c) The compliance date for existing sources for all the requirements that became effective on February 12, 2013, except for the open clinker pile requirements will be September 9, 2015.

(d) The complianc e date for new sources is February 12, 2013, or startup, whichever is later.

(e) The compliance date for existing sources with the requirements for open clinker storage piles in § 63.1343(c) is February 12, 2014.Page 90 of 106

§ 63.1352 Additional test methods.

(a) If you are conducting tests to determine the rates of emission of HCl from kilns and associated bypass stacks at portland cement manufacturing facilities, for use in applicability determin ations under § 63.1340, you may use Method 320 or Method 321 of appendix A of this part.

(b) Owners or operators conducting tests to determine the rates of emission of specific organic HAP from raw material dryers, and kilns at Portland cement manufacturin g facilities, solely for use in applicability determinations under § 63.1340 of this subpart are permitted to use Method 320 of appendix A to this part, or Method 18 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter.

Notification, Reporting and Recordkeeping

§ 63.1353 Notification requirements.

(a) The notification provisions of 40 CFR part 63, subpart A that apply and those that do not apply to owners and operators of affected sources subject to this subpart are listed in Table 1 of this subpart. If any State requires a notice that contains all of the information required in a notification listed in this section, the owner or operator may send the Administrator a copy of the notice sent to the State to satisfy the requirements of this section for that notification.

(b) Each owner or operator subject to the requirements of this subpart shall comply with the notification requirements in § 63.9 as follows:

(1) Initial notifications as required by § 63.9(b) through (d). For the purposes of this subpart, a Title V or 40 CFR part 70 permit application may be used in lieu of the initial notification required under § 63.9(b), provided the same information is contained in the permit application as requir ed by § 63.9(b), and the State to which the permit application has been submitted has an approved operating permit program under part 70 of this chapter and has received delegation of authority from the EPA. Permit applications shall be submitted by the sa me due dates as those specified for the initial notification. Deleted: [76 FR 2836, Jan. 18, 2011, as amended
at 7 8 FR 10053, Feb. 12, 2013] ¶

Deleted: [75 FR 55063, Sept. 9, 2010, as
amended at 78 FR 10053, Feb. 12, 2013] ¶ ¶Page 91 of 106

(2) Notification of performance tests, as required by §§ 63.7 and 63.9(e).

(3) Notification of opacity and visible emission observations required by § 63.1349 in accordance with §§ 63.6(h)(5) an d 63.9(f).

(4) Notification, as required by § 63.9(g), of the date that the continuous emission monitor performance evaluation required by § 63.8(e) is scheduled to begin.

(5) Notification of compliance status, as required by § 63.9(h).

(6) Within 48 hours of an exceedance that triggers retesting to establish compliance and new operating limits, notify the appropriate permitting agency of the planned performance tests. The notification requirements of §§ 63.7(b) and 63.9(e) do not apply to retesting require d for exceedances under this subpart.

§ 63.1354 Reporting requirements.

(a) The reporting provisions of subpart A of this part that apply and those that do not apply to owners or ope rators of affected sources subject to this subpart are listed in Table 1 of this subpart. If any State requires a report that contains all of the information required in a report listed in this section, the owner or operator may send the Administrator a co py of the report sent to the State to satisfy the requirements of this section for that report.

(b) The owner or operator of an affected source shall comply with the reporting requirements specified in § 63.10 of the general provisions of this part 63, sub part A as follows:

(1) As required by § 63.10(d)(2), the owner or operator shall report the results of performance tests as part of the notification of compliance status.

(2) As required by § 63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an
affected source shall r eport the opacity results from tests required by § 63.1349. Deleted: [64 FR 31925, June 14, 1999, as amended at 78 FR 10053, Feb. 12, 2013] ¶Page 92 of 106

(3) As required by § 63.10(d)(4), the owner or operator of an affected source who is required to submit progress reports as a condition of receiving an extension of compliance under § 63.6(i) shal l submit such reports by the dates specified in the written extension of compliance.

(4)

— (5) [Reserved]

(6) As required by § 63.10(e)(2), the owner or operator shall submit a written report of the results of the performance evaluation for the continuous mo nitoring system required by § 63.8(e). The owner or operator shall submit the report simultaneously with the results of the performance test.

(7) As required by § 63.10(e)(2), the owner or operator of an affected source using a continuous opacity monitorin g system to determine opacity compliance during any performance test required under § 63.7 and described in § 63.6(d)(6) shall report the results of the continuous opacity monitoring system performance evaluation conducted under § 63.8(e).

(8) As required by § 63.10(e)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source equipped with a continuous emission monitor shall submit an excess emissions and continuous monitoring system performance report for any event when the continuous monitoring system data indicate the source is not in compliance with the applicable emission limitation or operating parameter limit.

(9) The owner or operator shall submit a summary report semiannually to the EPA via the Compliance and Emissions Data Reporting Interface (CEDRI). (CEDRI can be accessed through the EPA's Central Data Exchange (CDX) ( www.epa.gov/cdx ).) You must use the appropriate electronic report in CEDRI for this subpart. Instead of using the electronic report in CEDRI for this subpart, you may submit an alternate elect ronic file consistent with the extensible markup language (XML) schema listed on the CEDRI website ( http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/cedri/index.html ), once the XML schema is available. If the repor ting form specific to this subpart is not available in CEDRI at the time that the report is due, you must submit the report the Administrator at the appropriate address listed in § 63.13. You must begin submitting reports via CEDRI no later than 90 days af ter the form becomes available in CEDRI. The reports must be submitted Formatted: Default Paragraph Font, Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 ptPage 93 of 106

by the deadline specified in this subpart, regardless of the method in which the reports are submitted.

The report must contain the information specified in §63.10(e)(3)(vi). In additi on, the summary report shall include:

(i) All exceedances of maximum control device inlet gas temperature limits specified in § 63. 1346 (a) and (b);

(ii) Notification of any failure to calibrate thermocouples and other temperature sensors as required under § 63.1350( g )(1)(iii) of this subpart; and

(iii) Notification of any failure to maintain the activated carbon injection rate, and the activated carbon injection carrier gas flow rate or pressure drop, as applicable, as required under § 63.134 6 (c) (2)

.

(iv) Notification of failure to conduct any combustion system component inspections conducted within the reporting period as required under § 63. 1347(a)(3).

(v) Any and a ll failures to comply with any provision of the operation and maintenance plan developed in accordance with § 63. 1347(a ).

(vi) For each PM CPMS , HCl, Hg, and THC CEMS , D/F temperature monitoring system, or Hg sorbent trap monitoring system, within 60 days after the reporting periods, you must submit reports to the EPA's WebFIRE database by using the Compliance and Emissions Data Reporting Interface (CEDRI) that is accessed through the EPA's Central Data Exchange (CDX) ( www.epa.gov/cdx ). You must use the appropriate electronic reporting form in CEDRI or provide an alternate electronic file consisten t with the EPA's reporting form output format. For each reporting period, the reports must include all of the calculated 30

- operating day rolling average values derived from the CEMS or Hg sorbent trap monitoring systems.

(vii) In response to each violatio n of an emissions standard or established operating parameter limit, the date, duration and description of each violation and the specific actions taken for each violation including inspections, corrective actions and repeat performance tests and the resul ts of those actions. Deleted: The owner or operator shall submit a summary report semiannually which contains the information specified in § 63.10(e)(3)(vi). In addition, the summary report shall include: ¶

Deleted: exceedences

Deleted: 1344

Deleted: All failures

Deleted: f)(7

Deleted: )

Deleted: All failures

Deleted: 4

Deleted: T he results of

Deleted: 1350(i).

Deleted: A

Deleted: 1350(a).Page 94 of 106

(viii) Within 60 days after the date of completing each CEMS performance evaluation test as defined in §63.2, you must submit relative accuracy test audit (RATA) data to the EPA's CDX by using CEDRI in accordance with paragraph (b) (9) of this section. Only RATA pollutants that can be documented with the ERT (as listed on the ERT Web site) are subject to this requirement. For any performance evaluations with no corresponding RATA pollutants listed on the ERT Web site, you must submit the results of the performance evaluation to the Administrator at the appropriate address listed in §63.13.

(ix) For PM performance test reports used to set a PM CPMS operating limit, the electronic submission of the test report must also include the make and model of the PM CPMS instrument, serial number of the instrument, analytical principle of the instrument (e.g. beta attenuation), span of the instruments primary analytical range, milliamp value equivalent to the instrument zero output, technique by which this zero value was determined, and the average milliamp signals corresponding to each PM compliance test run.

(x) All reports required by this subpart not subject to the requirements in paragraphs (b)(9) introductory text and (b)(9)(viii) of this section must be sent to the Administrator at the appropriate address listed in §63.13. The Administrator or the delegated authority may request a report in any form suitable for the specific case (e.g., by commonly used electronic media such as Excel spreadsheet, on CD or hard copy). The Administrator retains the right to require submittal of reports subject to paragraph (b)(9) and (b)(9)(viii) of this section in paper format.

(10) If the total continuous monitoring system downtime for any CEM or any continuous mo nitoring system (CMS) for the reporting period is ten percent or greater of the total operating time for the reporting period, the owner or operator shall submit an excess emissions and continuous monitoring system performance report along with the summary report.

(c) Reporting a failure to meet a standard due to a
malfunction. For each failure to meet a standard or emissions limit caused by a malfunction at an affected source, you must report the failure in the semi

- annual compliance report required by § 6 3.1354(b)(9). The report must contain the date, time and duration, and the cause of each event (including unknown cause, if applicable), and a sum of the number of events in thePage 95 of 106

reporting period. The report must list for each event the
affected source or e quipment, an estimate of the volume of each regulated pollutant emitted over the emission limit for which the source failed to meet a standard, and a description of the method used to estimate the emissions. The report must also include a description of ac tions taken by an owner or operator during a malfunction of an affected source to minimize emissions in accordance with § 63.1348(d), including actions taken to correct a malfunction.

§ 63.1355 Recordkeeping requirements.

(a) The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily
available for i nspection and review as required by § 63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data sh all be retained on site. The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche.

(b) The owner or operator shall maintain records for each
aff ected source as required by § 63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3) of this part; and

(1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status under § 63.9;

(2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses ; and

(3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under § 63.8(f)(6), any information demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of recordkeeping or reporting requirements.

(c) In addition to the recordkeeping requir ements in paragraph (b) of this section, the owner or operator of an affected source equipped with a continuous monitoring system shall maintain all records required by § 63.10(c). Deleted: [64 FR 31925, June 14, 1999, as amended at 75 FR 55063, Sept. 9, 2010; 7 8 FR 10053, Feb. 12, 2013] ¶Page 96 of 106

(d) Reserve

(e) You must keep records of the daily clinker production rates and kiln feed rates.

(f) You must keep records of the date, time and duration of each startup or shutdown period for any affected source that is subject to a standard during startup or shutdown that differs from the standard applicable at other times, and the quantity of feed and fuel used during the startup or sh utdown period.

(g)(1) You must keep records of the date, time and duration of each malfunction that causes an affected source to fail to meet an applicable standard; if there was also a monitoring malfunction, the date, time and duration of the monitoring malfunction; the record must list the affected source or equipment, an estimate of the volume of each regulated pollutant
emitted over the standard for which the source failed to meet a standard, and a description of the method used to estimate the emissio ns.

(2) You must keep records of actions taken during periods of malfunction to minimize emissions in accordance with § 63.1348(d) including corrective actions to restore malfunctioning process and air pollution control and monitoring equipment to its norm al or usual manner of operation.

(h) For each exceedance from an emissions standard or established operating parameter limit, you must keep records of the date, duration and description of each exceedance and the specific actions taken for each exceedance including inspections, corrective actions and repeat performance tests and the results of those actions.

Other

§ 63.1356 Sour ces with multiple emissions limit or monitoring requirements.
If you have an affected source subject to this subpart with a different emissions limit or requirement for the same pollutant under another regulation in title 40 of this chapter, once you are i n compliance with the most stringent emissions limit or Deleted: You must keep annual records of the amount of CKD which is removed from the kiln system and either disposed of as solid waste or otherwise recycled for a beneficial use outside of the kiln system.

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Deleted: [64 FR 31925, June 14, 1999, as amended at 71 FR 76552, Dec. 20, 2006; 75 FR 55064, Sept. 9, 2010; 78 FR 10053, Feb. 12, 2013] ¶Page 97 of 106

requirement, you are not subject to the less stringent requirement. Until you are in compliance with the more stringent limit, the less stringent limit continues to apply.

§ 63.1357 [Reserved]

§ 63.1358 Implementation and enforcement.

(a) This subpart can be implemented and enforced by the U.S. EPA, or a delegated authority such as th e applicable State, local, or Tribal agency. If the U.S. EPA Administrator has delegated authority to a State, local, or Tribal agency, then that agency, in addition to the U.S. EPA, has the authority to implement and enforce this subpart. Contact the appl icable U.S. EPA Regional Office to find out if this subpart is delegated to a State, local, or Tribal agency.

(b) In delegating implementation and enforcement authority of this subpart to a State, local, or Tribal agency under subpart E of this part, the a uthorities contained in paragraph (c) of this section are retained by the Administrator of U.S. EPA and cannot be transferred to the State, local, or Tribal agency.

(c) The authorities that cannot be delegated to State, local, or Tribal agencies are as spe cified in paragraphs (c)(1) through (4) of this section.

(1) Approval of alternatives to the requirements in §§ 63.1340, 63.1342 through 63.1348, and 63.1351.

(2) Approval of major alternatives to test methods under § 63.7(e)(2)(ii) and (f), as defined in § 63.90, and as required in this subpart.

(3) Approval of major alternatives to monitoring under § 63.8(f), as defined in § 63.90, and as required in this subpart.

(4) Approval of major alternatives to recordkeeping and reporting under § 63.10(f), as defin ed in § 63.90, and as required in this subpart.

[68 FR 37359, June 23, 2003] Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt Deleted: If an affected facility sub ject to this subpart has a different emissions limit or requirement for the same pollutant under another regulation in title 40 of this chapter, the owner or operator of the affected facility must comply with the most stringent emissions limit or requireme nt and is exempt from the less stringent requirement. ¶

Deleted: [78 FR 10053, Feb. 12, 2013] ¶

Deleted: Temporary, conditioned exemption from particulate matter and opacity standards. ¶ (a) Subject to the limitations of paragraphs (b) through (f) of this section, an owner or operator conducting PM CEMS correlation tests (that is, correlation with manual stack methods) is exempt from: ¶ (1) Any PM and opacity standards of part 60 or part 63 of this chapter that are applicable to cement kilns and clinker coolers. ¶ (2) Any permit or other emissions or operating parameter or other limitation on workplace practices that are applicable to cement kilns and clinker coolers to ensure compliance with any PM and opacity standards of this part or part 60 of this chapter. ¶ (b) The own er or operator must develop a PM CEMS correlation test plan. The plan must be submitted to the Administrator for approval at least 90 days before the correlation test is scheduled to be conducted. The plan must include: ¶ (1) The number of test conditions an d the number of runs for each test condition; ¶ (2) The target particulate matter emission level for each test condition; ¶ (3) How the operation of the affected source will be modified to attain the desired particulate matter emission rate; and ¶ (4) The antici pated normal particulate matter emission level. ¶ (c) The Administrator will review and approve or disapprove the correlation test plan in accordance with § 63.7(c)(3)(i) and (iii). If the Administrator fails to approve or disapprove the correlation test pla n within the time period specified in § 63.7(c)(3)(iii), the plan shall be considered approved, unless the Administrator has requested additional information. ¶ (d) The stack sampling team must be on

- site and prepared to perform correlation testing no
later than 24 hours after operations are modified to attain the desired particulate matter emissions concentrations, unless the correlation test plan documents that a longer period is appropriate. ¶ (e) The PM and opacity standards and associated operating limits and conditions will not be waived for more than 96 hours, in the aggregate, for the purposes of conducting tests to correlate PM CEMS with manual method test results, including all runs and conditions, except as described in this

... Deleted: [64 FR 31925, June 14, 1999, as amended at 67 FR 16622, Apr. 5, 2002; 78 FR 10054, Feb. 12, 2013] ¶ ¶Page 98 of 106

§ 63.1359 [Reserved]

Table 1 to Subpart LLL of Part 63

— Applicability of General Provisions

Citation Requirement Applies
to subpart
LLL Explanation

63.1(a)(1)

- (4) Applicabilit y Yes

63.1(a)(5) No [Reserved]

63.1(a)(6)

- (8) Applicability Yes

63.1(a)(9) No [Reserved]

63.1(a)(10)

- (14) Applicability Yes

63.1(b)(1) Initial Applicability

Determination No § 63.1340 specifies applicability.

63.1(b)(2)

- (3) Initial Applicability

Determination Yes

63.1(c)(1) Applicability After

Standard Established Yes

63.1(c)(2) Permit Requirements Yes Area sources must obtain Title V permits.

63.1(c)(3) No [Reserved]

63.1(c)(4)

- (5) Extensions, Notifications Yes.

63.1(d) No [Reserved]

63.1(e) Applicability of Permit

Program Yes

63.2 Definitions Yes Additional definitions in § 63.1341.Page 99 of 106

63.3(a)

- (c) Units and Abbreviations Yes

63.4(a)(1)

- (3) Prohibited Activities Yes

63.4(a)(4) No [Reserved]

63.4(a)(5) Compliance date Yes

63.4(b )

- (c) Circumvention,

Severability Yes

63.5(a)(1)

- (2) Construction/Reconstructi

on Yes

63.5(b)(1) Compliance Dates Yes

63.5(b)(2) No [Reserved]

63.5(b)(3)

- (6) Construction Approval,

Applicability Yes

63.5(c) No [Reserved]

63.5(d)(1)

- (4) Approval of

Construction/Reconstructi

on Yes

63.5(e) Approval of

Construction/Reconstructi

on Yes

63.5(f)(1)

- (2) Approval of

Construction/Reconstructi

on Yes

63.6(a) Compliance for Standards

and Maintenance Yes

63.6(b)(1)

- (5) Compliance Dates Yes

63.6(b)(6) No [Reserved]

63.6(b)(7) Compliance Dates Yes

63.6(c)(1)

- (2) Compliance Dates Yes

63.6(c)(3)

- (4) No [Reserved]

63.6(c)(5) Compliance Dates Yes

63.6(d) No [Reserved]

63.6(e)(1)

- (2) Operation & Maintenance No See § 63.1348(d ) for general duty Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 ptPage 100 of 106 requ irement. Any reference

to § 63.6(e)(1)(i ) in other
General Provisions or in this subpart is to
be treated as

a cross

reference to § 63.1348(d).

63.6(e)(3) Startup, Shutdown

Malfunction Plan No Your operations and maintenance plan must
address periods of

s tartup and
shutdown. See § 63.1347(a)(1 ).

63.6(f)(1) Compliance with Emission

Standards No Compliance obligations specified in subpart LLL.

63.6(f)(2)

- (3) Compliance with Emission

Standards Yes

63.6(g)(1)

- (3) Alternative Standard Yes

63.6(h)(1) Opaci ty/VE Standards No Compliance obligations specified in subpart LLL.

63.6(h)(2) Opacity/VE Standards Yes

63.6(h)(3) No [Reserved]

63.6(h)(4)

- (h)(5)(i) Opacity/VE Standards Yes

63.6(h)(5)(ii)

- (iv) Opacity/VE Standards No Test duration specified in
sub part LLL. Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 ptPage 101 of 106

63.6(h)(6) Opacity/VE Standards Yes

63.6(h)(7) Opacity/VE Standards Yes

63.6(i)(1)

- (14) Extension of Compliance Yes

63.6(i)(15) No [Reserved]

63.6(i)(16) Extension of Compliance Yes

63.6(j) Exemption from Compliance Yes

63.7(a)(1)

- (3 ) Performance Testing

Requirements Yes § 63.1349 has specific requirements.

63.7(b) Notification period Yes Except for repeat performance test caused by
an exceedance.
See § 63.1353(b)(6 )

63.7(c) Quality Assurance/Test

Plan Yes

63.7(d) Testing Facilities Yes

63.7(e)(1) Conduct of Tests No See § 63.1349(e ). Any
reference to 63.7(e)(1) in
other General Provisions or in this subpart is to
be treated as

a cross

reference to § 63.1349(e).

63.7(e)(2)

- (4) Conduct of tests Yes

63.7(f) Altern ative Test Method Yes

63.7(g) Data Analysis Yes

63.7(h) Waiver of Tests Yes Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Not Strikethrough

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 ptPage 102 of 106

63.8(a)(1) Monitoring Requirements Yes

63.8(a)(2) Monitoring No § 63.1350 includes CEMS requirements.

63.8(a)(3) No [Reserved]

63.8(a)(4) Monitoring No Flares not applic able.

63.8(b)(1)

- (3) Conduct of Monitoring Yes

63.8(c)(1)

- (8) CMS Operation/Maintenance Yes Temperature and activated
carbon injection monitoring data reduction requirements given in subpart LLL.

63.8(d) Quality Control Yes, except for the
referenc
e to the
SSM Plan in the
last
sentence

63.8(e) Performance Evaluation

for CMS Yes

63.8(f)(1)

- (5) Alternative Monitoring

Method Yes Additional requirements
in § 63.1350(l).

63.8(f)(6) Alternative to RATA Test Yes

63.8(g) Data Reduction Yes

63.9(a) Noti fication Requirements Yes

63.9(b)(1)

- (5) Initial Notifications Yes

63.9(c) Request for Compliance

Extension Yes Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 ptPage 103 of 106

63.9(d) New Source Notification

for Special Compliance Requirements Yes

63.9(e) Notification of

performance test Yes Except for repeat

p erformance test caused by
an exceedance.
See § 63.1353(b)(6 )

63.9(f) Notification of

VE/Opacity Test Yes Notification not required for VE/opacity
test under § 63.1350(e) and (j).

63.9(g) Additional CMS

Notifications Yes

63.9(h)(1)

- (3) Notification of

C ompliance Status Yes

63.9(h)(4) No [Reserved]

63.9(h)(5)

- (6) Notification of

Compliance Status Yes

63.9(i) Adjustment of Deadlines Yes

63.9(j) Change in Previous

Information Yes

63.10(a) Recordkeeping/Reporting Yes

63.10(b)(1) General Recordkee ping

Requirements Yes

63.10(b)(2)(i)

- (ii) General Recordkeeping

Requirements No See § 63.1355(g ) and (h).

63.10(b)(2)(ii i) General Recordkeeping

Requirements Yes

63.10(b)(2)(iv )

- (v) General Recordkeeping

Requirements No

63.10(b)(2)(vi )

- (ix) General R ecordkeeping

Requirements Yes Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 ptPage 104 of 106

63.10(c)(1) Additional CMS

Recordkeeping Yes PS

- 8A supersedes requirements
for THC CEMS.

63.10(c)(1) Additional CMS

Recordkeeping Yes PS

- 8A supersedes requirements
for THC CEMS.

63.10(c)(2)

- (4) No [Reserved]

63.10(c)(5)

- (8) Additional CMS

Recordkeeping Yes PS

- 8A supersedes requirements
for THC CEMS.

63.10(c)(9) No [Reserved]

63.10(c)(10)

- (15) Additional CMS

Recordkeeping Yes PS

- 8A supersedes requirements
for THC CEMS.

63.10(d)(1) General Reporting

Requirements Yes

6 3.10(d)(2) Performance Test Results Yes

63.10(d)(3) Opacity or VE

Observations Yes

63.10(d)(4) Progress Reports Yes

63.10(d)(5) Startup, Shutdown,

Malfunction Reports No See § 63.1354(c ) for reporting requirements. Any reference
to § 63.10(d)(5) in ot her
General Provisions or in this subpart is to
be treated as

a cross

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 ptPage 105 of 106 reference to § 63.1354(c).

63.10(e)(1)

- (2) Additional CMS Reports Yes

63.10(e)(3) Excess Emissions and CMS

Performance Reports Yes Exceedances are defined in subpart LLL.

63.10(e)(3) (vi i ) and (viii) Excess Emissions and CMS

Performance Reports No Superseded by 63.1354(b)(10)

63.10(f) Waiver for

Recordkeeping/Reporting Yes

63.11(a)

- (b) Control Device

Requirements No Flares not applicable.

63.12(a)

- (c) State Authority and

Delegatio ns Yes

63.13(a)

- (c) State/Regional Addresses Yes

63.14(a)

- (b) Incorporation by

Reference Yes

63.15(a)

- (b) Availability of

Information Yes

[75 FR 55064, Sept. 9, 2010, as amended at 78 FR 10054, Feb. 12, 2013]

Back to Top

For questions or comments regarding e

- CFR editorial content, features, or design, email ecfr@nara.gov

. For questions concerning e

- CFR programming and delivery issues, email webteam@gpo.gov

.

732 North Capitol Street, NW, Washington, DC 20401

- 0001 202.512.1800 Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt, Font color: Auto

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt, Font color: Auto

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt, Font color: Auto

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 pt

Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 12 ptPage 106 of 106 Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New