# C_2014102EN.01002301.xml

| 7.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 102/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 102/23

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Mons (Belgium) lodged on 5 February 2014 — Régie communale autonome du stade Luc Varenne v État Belge

(Case C-55/14)

2014/C 102/32

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Cour d’appel de Mons

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Régie communale autonome du stade Luc Varenne

Applicant:

Defendant: État belge

Defendant:

Does the making available of the facilities of a sports installation used exclusively for footballing purposes, understood as being the right to use and exploit the football stadium playing surface (the pitch) and the players’ and referees’ changing rooms on an ad hoc basis for up to 18 days per season (a season starting on 1 July each calendar year and ending on 30 June the following year), constitute an exempt letting of immovable property for the purposes of Article 13B(b) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (1) (Article 135(1)(l) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1)), (2) in so far as the party granting the right of use and exploitation:

ad hoc

1

2

| — | is fully entitled to confer identical rights on other natural or legal persons of its choice in respect of days other than the 18 days referred to above; |
| --- | --- |

—

is fully entitled to confer identical rights on other natural or legal persons of its choice in respect of days other than the 18 days referred to above;

| — | has the right to access those facilities at any time, without the prior consent of the holder of the right of use and exploitation, in order, in particular, to satisfy itself of the proper use of the facilities and to pre-empt any damage, on the sole condition that it does not disrupt the smooth running of sports events; |
| --- | --- |

—

has the right to access those facilities at any time, without the prior consent of the holder of the right of use and exploitation, in order, in particular, to satisfy itself of the proper use of the facilities and to pre-empt any damage, on the sole condition that it does not disrupt the smooth running of sports events;

| — | retains, in addition, a right of permanent control over access to those facilities, including during the period of their use by RFCT; |
| --- | --- |

—

retains, in addition, a right of permanent control over access to those facilities, including during the period of their use by RFCT;

| — | seeks a flat-rate fee of EUR 1 750 per day for use of the playing surface, the changing rooms, the bar and the caretaking, surveillance and monitoring service for the facilities as a whole, it being understood that it has been agreed between the parties that, of the amount sought, 20% represents the right of access to the football pitch and 80% the consideration for various services connected with the maintenance, cleaning, upkeep (mowing, sowing, and so on) and regulatory compliance of the playing surface and ancillary services supplied by the party granting the right of use and exploitation (namely, RCA, the present appellant)? |
| --- | --- |

—

seeks a flat-rate fee of EUR 1 750 per day for use of the playing surface, the changing rooms, the bar and the caretaking, surveillance and monitoring service for the facilities as a whole, it being understood that it has been agreed between the parties that, of the amount sought, 20% represents the right of access to the football pitch and 80% the consideration for various services connected with the maintenance, cleaning, upkeep (mowing, sowing, and so on) and regulatory compliance of the playing surface and ancillary services supplied by the party granting the right of use and exploitation (namely, RCA, the present appellant)?

---

(1)  OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1.

1

(2)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).

2

---