64576 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 210 / Thursday, October 30, 2014 / Notices 

Item Estimated time for response 

Estimated 

annual 

responses 

Estimated 

annual burden 

hours 

Russian Federal Service for Intellectual Property (ROSPATENT), Form 

PTO/SB/20RU.

2 hours ............................................. 10 20 

Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (IPOS), Form PTO/SB/20SG ... 2 hours ............................................. 10 20 

Spanish Patent and Trademark Office (SPTO), Form PTO/SB/20ES ...... 2 hours ............................................. 10 20 

Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (TIPO), Form PTO/SB/20TW ............ 2 hours ............................................. 10 20 

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO), Form PTO/SB/

20UK.

2 hours ............................................. 40 80 

U.S. Applications Where the USPTO was the ISA or IPEA, Form PTO/

SB/20PCT–US.

2 hours ............................................. 200 400 

Intellectual Property Office of Australia (IPAU), Form PTO/SB/20PCT– 

AU.

2 hours ............................................. 30 60 

Austrian Patent Office (APO), Form PTO/SB/20PCT–AT ........................ 2 hours ............................................. 10 20 

Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO), Form PTO/SB/20PCT–CA 2 hours ............................................. 10 20 

State Intellectual Property Office of the P.R.C. (SIPO), Form PTO/SB/

20PCT–CN.

2 hours ............................................. 80 160 

European Patent Office (EPO), Form PTO/SB/20PCT–EP ...................... 2 hours ............................................. 550 1100 

National Board of Patents and Registration of Finland (NBPR), Form 

PTO/SB/20PCT–FI.

2 hours ............................................. 10 20 

Israeli Patent Office (ILPO), Form PTO/SB/20PCT–IL ............................. 2 hours ............................................. 10 20 

Japan Patent Office (JPO), Form PTO/SB/20PCT–JP ............................. 2 hours ............................................. 150 300 

Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO), Form PTO/SB/20PCT–KR ... 2 hours ............................................. 550 1100

Nordic Patent Institute (NPI), Form PTO/SB/20PCT–NPI ........................ 2 hours ............................................. 10 20 

Russian Federal Service for Intellectual Property (ROSPATENT), Form 

PTO/SB/20PCT–RU.

2 hours ............................................. 10 20 

Spanish Patent and Trademark Office (SPTO), Form PTO/SB/20PCT– 

ES.

2 hours ............................................. 10 20 

Swedish Patent and Registration Office (PRV), Form PTO/SB/20PCT– 

SE.

2 hours ............................................. 10 20 

Totals .................................................................................................. .......................................................... 8,210 16,420 

Estimated Total Annual Non-hour 

Respondent Cost Burden: $0. There are 

no capital start-up, maintenance, or 

postage costs associated with this 

collection. This collection also has no 

filing fees or recordkeeping costs. 

IV. Request for Comments 

Comments are invited on: (a) Whether 

the proposed collection of information 

is necessary for the proper performance 

of the functions of the agency, including 

whether the information shall have 

practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden 

(including hours and cost) of the 

proposed collection of information; (c) 

ways to enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and (d) ways to minimize the 

burden of the collection of information 

on respondents, e.g., the use of 

automated collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology. 

Comments submitted in response to 

this notice will be summarized or 

included in the request for OMB 

approval of this information collection; 

they also will become a matter of public 

record. 

Dated: October 23, 2014. 

Marcie Lovett, 

Records Management Division Director, 

USPTO, Office of the Chief Information 

Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2014–25866 Filed 10–29–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–16–P 

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING 

COMMISSION 

Sunshine Act Meetings 

TIME AND DATE: 10:30 a.m. EST, Monday, 

November 3, 2014. 

PLACE: CFTC Headquarters Conference 

Center, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 

21st Street NW., Washington, DC. 

STATUS: Open. 

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The 

Commission will hold this meeting to 

consider rulemaking and related 

matters, including the issuance of 

proposed rules and a final 

interpretation. The agenda for this 

meeting is available to the public and 

posted on the Commission’s Web site at 

http://www.cftc.gov. In the event that 

the time, date, or place of this meeting 

changes, an announcement of the 

change, along with the new time, date, 

or place of the meeting, will be posted 

on the Commission’s Web site. 

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Christopher J. Kirkpatrick, Secretary of 

the Commission, 202–418–5964. 

Christopher J. Kirkpatrick, 

Secretary of the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2014–25894 Filed 10–28–14; 11:15 am] 

BILLING CODE 6351–01–P 

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY 

COMMISSION 

[CPSC Docket No. 15–C0001] 

One World Technologies, Inc., and 

Baja, Inc., Provisional Acceptance of a 

Settlement Agreement and Order 

AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: It is the policy of the 

Commission to publish settlements 

which it provisionally accepts under the 

Consumer Product Safety Act in the 

Federal Register in accordance with the 

terms of 16 CFR 1118.20(e). Published 

below is a provisionally-accepted 

Settlement Agreement with One World 

Technologies, Inc., and Baja, Inc., 

containing a civil penalty of $4.3 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 210 / Thursday, October 30, 2014 / Notices 64577 

1The Commission voted (4–1) to provisionally 

accept this Settlement Agreement and Order. 

Chairman Elliot F. Kaye and Commissioners Robert 

S. Adler, Marietta S. Robinson and Joseph P. 

Mohorovic voted to provisionally accept the 

Settlement Agreement and Order. Commissioner 

Ann Marie Buerkle voted to reject the Settlement 

Agreement and Order. 

million dollars ($4,300,000.00 U.S. 

dollars), within twenty (20) days of 

service of the Commission’s final Order 

accepting the Settlement Agreement.1

DATES: Any interested person may ask 

the Commission not to accept this 

agreement or otherwise comment on its 

contents by filing a written request with 

the Office of the Secretary by November 

14, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: Persons wishing to 

comment on this Settlement Agreement 

should send written comments to the 

Comment 15–C0001 Office of the 

Secretary, Consumer Product Safety 

Commission, 4330 East West Highway, 

Room 820, Bethesda, Maryland 20814– 

4408. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Daniel Vice, Trial Attorney, Office of the 

General Counsel, Consumer Product 

Safety Commission, 4330 East West 

Highway, Bethesda, Maryland 20814– 

4408; telephone (301) 504–6996. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The text of 

the Agreement and Order appears 

below. 

Dated: October 27, 2014. 

Todd A. Stevenson, 

Secretary. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY 

COMMISSION 

In the Matter of: 

One World Technologies, Inc., 

and Baja, Inc. 

CPSC Docket No.: 15–C0001 

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 

1. In accordance with the Consumer 

Product Safety Act (CPSA), 15 U.S.C. 

§§ 2051–2089 and 16 C.F.R. § 1118.20, 

One World Technologies, Inc. and Baja, 

Inc. (the Firm), and the U.S. Consumer 

Product Safety Commission 

(Commission), through its staff (staff), 

enter into this Settlement Agreement 

(Agreement). The Agreement and the 

incorporated attached Order (Order) 

resolve staff’s charges set forth below. 

THE PARTIES 

2. The Commission is an independent 

federal regulatory agency, established 

pursuant to, and responsible for, the 

enforcement of the CPSA. By executing 

the Agreement, staff is acting on behalf 

of the Commission, pursuant to 16 

C.F.R. § 1118.20(b). The Commission 

issues the Order under the provisions of 

the CPSA. 

3. Baja, Inc. (Baja) is incorporated in 

Delaware with its principal place of 

business in Anderson, South Carolina. 

One World Technologies, Inc., is a 

Delaware corporation with its principal 

offices in Anderson, South Carolina. 

One World Technologies, Inc., and Baja 

are corporate affiliates. 

STAFF CHARGES 

4. Baja imported and sold nationwide 

in the United States approximately 

308,000 minibikes and go-carts with 

model numbers beginning with BB65, 

DB30, DN65, DR90, HT65, MB165, 

MB196, SD65, TR65, WR65, and WR90 

(Subject Products). 

5. The Subject Products (a) contain a 

defect which could create a substantial 

product hazard, and (b) create an 

unreasonable risk of serious injury 

because the gas cap can leak or detach 

from the fuel tank, posing a fire and 

burn hazard to consumers, and because 

the throttle can stick due to an 

improperly positioned fuel line and 

throttle cable. 

6. The Subject Products are 

‘‘consumer products,’’ and at all 

relevant times, Baja was a 

‘‘manufacturer and distributor’’ of these 

consumer products, which were 

‘‘distributed in commerce,’’ as those 

terms are defined or used in sections 

3(a)(5), (7), (8), (9) and (11) of the CPSA, 

15 U.S.C. § 2052(a)(5), (7), (8), (9) and 

(11). 

7. Baja received four consumer reports 

of fires that occurred as a result of a 

leaking gas cap, some of which resulted 

in burn injuries to consumers, including 

children. 

8. The family of a child who alleged 

that he was injured when a gas cap leak 

on a WR65 minibike resulted in a fire 

sued Baja. 

9. The Firm settled personal injury 

claims of consumers who were injured 

as a result of a leaking gas cap. 

10. Baja received approximately two 

dozen consumer reports of stuck 

throttles in the Subject Products. 

11. Baja received communications 

from retailers reporting that consumers 

had experienced sudden acceleration 

while riding the Subject Products. 

12. Baja worked with the 

manufacturer to devise design changes 

to shorten the fuel line and remedy the 

hazard. Baja then implemented the 

design changes but did not notify 

consumers who owned the Subject 

Products about the design changes. 

13. The Firm had information which 

reasonably supported the conclusion 

that the Subject Products (a) contained 

a defect which could create a substantial 

product hazard, and (b) created an 

unreasonable risk of injury, requiring 

immediate reporting to the Commission 

under section 15(b) of the CPSA, 15 

U.S.C. § 2064(b). The Firm failed to so 

report. 

14. The Firm did not report to the 

Commission under section 15(b) of the 

CPSA with respect to the Subject 

Products until June 2, 2010. 

15. In failing to inform the 

Commission about Subject Products 

immediately as required by section 

15(b) of the CPSA, the Firm knowingly 

violated CPSA section 19(a)(4), 15 

U.S.C. § 2068(a)(4), as the term 

‘‘knowingly’’ is defined in CPSA section 

20(d), 15 U.S.C. § 2069(d). 

16. Pursuant to CPSA section 20, 15 

U.S.C. § 2069, the Firm is subject to civil 

penalties for its knowing violation of 

CPSA section 19(a)(4), 15 U.S.C. 

§ 2068(a)(4). 

THE FIRM’S RESPONSE 

17. This Agreement does not 

constitute an admission by the Firm to 

the charges set forth in paragraphs 4 

through 16, including but not limited to 

the charge that the Subject Products 

contained a defect which could create a 

substantial product hazard or created an 

unreasonable risk of serious injury or 

death, and the charge that the Firm 

failed to notify the Commission in a 

timely manner, in accordance with 

section 15(b) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 

2064(b). 

18. The four reports of fires that 

occurred as a result of a leaking gas cap 

cited by the staff were out of over 

250,000 units on the market. In two of 

the instances, the gas cap was not 

available for Baja’s inspection and in the 

third instance the unit was so badly 

damaged by fire that Baja could not 

determine the cause of the incident. 

19. The fourth incident involved a 

child who was badly burned and who 

filed suit. However, it was the opinion 

of Baja’s expert, following product 

inspections that took place in 2009 and 

2011, that the fuel leak came from a 

damaged fuel line, that the bike had not 

been properly maintained and that the 

gas cap, a standard bayonet cap, was not 

defective. This was the only one of the 

four cases in which a suit was filed, or 

in which Baja settled a lawsuit. 

20. The Firm received reports from 

two retailers referred to by the staff 

during the period 2008–2009 when 

there were over 150,000 units in use. 

Following the required pre-sale 

inspection of the vehicles, the retailers 

discovered a loose fuel line. The units 

were fixed before they were sold to 

consumers and no injuries were 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
64578 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 210 / Thursday, October 30, 2014 / Notices 

reported. There were no prior reports of 

a loose fuel line. 

21. In an effort to minimize the 

possibility that units with a loose fuel 

line would be delivered to retailers in 

the future, Baja contacted the 

manufacturer to improve its preshipment inspection procedures and 

reduce the length of the fuel line. 

22. Although two dozen consumers 

submitted reports of a stuck throttle, 

they did not claim that these were 

caused by an improperly positioned fuel 

line and throttle cable. 

23. The consumers reported only a 

stuck throttle which could have many 

other potential causes besides an 

improperly positioned fuel line and 

throttle cable, including: debris hanging 

up the throttle cable or in the 

carburetor; worn, broken or kinked 

throttle cable; dirt under or on the 

throttle slide and other damage caused 

by poor maintenance or misuse of a 

vehicle. 

24. The Firm has entered into this 

settlement to avoid the cost, distraction, 

delay, uncertainly and inconvenience of 

protracted litigation or other 

proceedings. 

AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES 

25. Under the CPSA, the Commission 

has jurisdiction over the matter 

involving Subject Products and over the 

Firm. 

26. In settlement of staff’s charges, 

and to avoid the cost, distraction, delay, 

uncertainty, and inconvenience of 

protracted litigation or other 

proceedings, the Firm shall pay a civil 

penalty in the amount of four million 

three hundred thousand dollars 

(US$4,300,000.00), which shall be due 

and payable within twenty calendar 

days after receiving service of the 

Commission’s final Order accepting the 

Agreement. All payments to be made 

under the Agreement shall constitute 

debts owing to the United States and 

shall be made by electronic wire transfer 

to the United States via: http://

www.pay.gov. 

27. The parties agree that this 

settlement figure is predicated, among 

other things, upon the accuracy of oral 

and written representations of, and 

statements by, the Firm and the Firm’s 

representatives (including 

representations set forth in the 

Agreement). 

28. The Firm currently has a written 

Post-Sale Product Safety Compliance 

Program, an established Product Hazard 

Committee and a Product Safety 

Education and Training Program 

(collectively, the Programs), designed to 

ensure compliance with the statutes and 

regulations enforced by the Commission 

(CPSC authority). These Programs 

contain, or will be modified to contain, 

the following elements: 

a) written standards and policies; 

b) systematic procedures for (i) 

reviewing and assessing reports, claims 

and other information (including 

consumer and retailer incident reports 

and personal injury claims) for potential 

safety issues, including the potential 

existence of a substantial risk of injury 

or a defect, and (ii) referring such 

reports, claims and other information to 

appropriate personnel responsible for 

complying with CPSC authority; 

c) a mechanism for confidential 

employee reporting of compliancerelated questions or concerns to a senior 

manager with authority to act as 

necessary; 

d) effective communication of 

company compliance-related policies 

and procedures to all employees, 

through training programs or otherwise; 

e) senior manager responsibility for 

compliance and senior manager 

accountability for violations of the 

statutes and regulations enforced by the 

Commission; 

f) oversight of compliance by the 

Firm’s governing body; and 

g) retention of all compliance-related 

records for at least five years, and 

availability of such records to CPSC staff 

upon request. 

29. It is the Firm’s policy and the 

Firm agrees to maintain and enforce a 

system of internal controls and 

procedures designed to ensure that: 

a) information required to be 

disclosed by the Firm to the 

Commission is recorded, processed, and 

reported in accordance with applicable 

law; 

b) all reporting made to the 

Commission is timely, truthful, 

complete, and accurate; and 

c) prompt disclosure is made to the 

Firm management of any significant 

deficiencies or material weaknesses in 

the design or operation of such internal 

controls that are reasonably likely to 

adversely affect in any material respect 

the Firm’s ability to record, process, and 

report to the Commission in accordance 

with applicable law. 

30. Upon request of staff, the Firm 

shall provide written documentation of 

any material changes in the Programs. 

31. The parties enter into the 

Agreement for settlement purposes only. 

The Agreement does not constitute an 

admission by the Firm or a 

determination by the Commission that 

the Firm violated the CPSA. 

32. Following staff’s receipt of the 

Agreement executed on behalf of the 

Firm, staff shall promptly submit the 

Agreement to the Commission for 

provisional acceptance. Promptly 

following provisional acceptance of the 

Agreement by the Commission, the 

Agreement shall be placed on the public 

record and published in the Federal 

Register, in accordance with the 

procedures set forth in 16 C.F.R. 

§ 1118.20(e). If, within fifteen calendar 

days, the Commission does not receive 

any written request not to accept the 

Agreement, the Agreement shall be 

deemed finally accepted on the 

sixteenth calendar day after the date the 

Agreement is published in the Federal 

Register, in accordance with 16 C.F.R. 

§ 1118.20(f). 

33. The Agreement is conditioned 

upon, and subject to, the Commission’s 

final acceptance, as set forth above, and 

is subject to the provisions of 16 C.F.R. 

§ 1118.20(h). Upon the later of: (i) The 

Commission’s final acceptance of the 

Agreement and service of the accepted 

Agreement upon the Firm, and (ii) the 

date of issuance of the final Order, the 

Agreement shall be in full force and 

effect and shall be binding upon the 

parties. 

34. Effective upon the later of: (i) The 

Commission’s final acceptance of the 

Agreement and service of the accepted 

Agreement upon the Firm, and (ii) the 

date of issuance of the final Order, for 

good and valuable consideration, the 

Firm hereby expressly and irrevocably 

waives and agrees not to assert any past, 

present, or future rights to the following 

actions or remedies in connection with 

the matters described in the Agreement: 

(a) An administrative or judicial 

hearing; (b) judicial review or other 

challenge or contest of the validity of 

the Order or of the Commission’s 

actions; (c) a determination by the 

Commission of whether the Firm failed 

to comply with the CPSA and the 

underlying regulations; (d) a statement 

of findings of fact and conclusions of 

law; and (e) any claims under the Equal 

Access to Justice Act. 

35. Upon request of staff, the Firm 

shall cooperate fully and truthfully with 

staff and shall make available all 

information, materials, and personnel 

deemed necessary by staff to evaluate 

the Firm’s compliance with the terms of 

the Agreement. 

36. The parties acknowledge and 

agree that the Commission may make 

public disclosure of the terms of the 

Agreement and the Order. 

37. The Firm represents that the 

Agreement: (i) Is entered into freely and 

voluntarily, without any degree of 

duress or compulsion whatsoever; (ii) 

has been duly authorized; and (iii) 

constitutes the valid and binding 

obligation of the Firm and each of its 

successors and/or assigns, enforceable 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 210 / Thursday, October 30, 2014 / Notices 64579 

against the Firm in accordance with the 

Agreement’s terms. The individuals 

signing the Agreement on behalf of the 

Firm represent and warrant that they are 

duly authorized by the Firm to execute 

the Agreement. 

38. The Commission signatories 

represent that they are signing the 

Agreement in their official capacities 

and that they are authorized to execute 

the Agreement. 

39. The Agreement is governed by the 

laws of the United States. 

40. The Agreement and the Order 

shall apply to, and be binding upon the 

Firm and each of its subsidiaries, 

successors, transferees, and assigns, and 

a violation of the Agreement or Order 

may subject such entities to appropriate 

legal action. 

41. The Agreement and the Order 

constitute the complete agreement 

among the parties on the subject matter 

contained herein and therein. 

42. The Agreement may be used in 

interpreting the Order. Understandings, 

agreements, representations, or 

interpretations apart from those 

contained in the Agreement and the 

Order may not be used to vary or 

contradict their terms. For purposes of 

construction, the Agreement shall be 

deemed to have been drafted by both of 

the parties, and shall not be construed 

against any party for that reason in any 

subsequent dispute. 

43. The Agreement shall not be 

waived, amended, modified, or 

otherwise altered, except as in 

accordance with the provisions of 16 

C.F.R. § 1118.20(h). The Agreement may 

be executed in counterparts. 

44. If any provision of the Agreement 

or the Order is held to be illegal, 

invalid, or unenforceable under present 

or future laws effective during the terms 

of the Agreement and the Order, such 

provision shall be fully severable. The 

balance of the Agreement and the Order 

shall remain in full force and effect, 

unless the Commission and the Firm 

agree that severing the provision 

materially affects the purpose of the 

Agreement and Order. 

Dated: 10/13/14 

BAJA, INC. 

By: llllllllllllllll

Michael Konick 

Treasurer 

ONE WORLD TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

Dated: 10/13/14 

By: llllllllllllllll

Michael Konick 

Chief Financial Officer 

U.S. CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY 

COMMISSION STAFF 

Stephanie Tsacoumis 

General Counsel 

Mary T. Boyle 

Deputy General Counsel 

Mary B. Murphy 

Assistant General Counsel 

Dated: 10/14/14 

By: llllllllllllllll

Daniel Vice 

Trial Attorney 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY 

COMMISSION 

In the Matter of: 

One World Technologies, Inc., 

and 

Baja, Inc. 

CPSC Docket No.: 15–C0001 

ORDER 

Upon consideration of the Settlement 

Agreement entered into between One 

World Technologies, Inc., and Baja, Inc. 

(the Firm), and the U.S. Consumer 

Product Safety Commission 

(Commission), and the Commission 

having jurisdiction over the subject 

matter and over the Firm, and it 

appearing that the Settlement 

Agreement and the Order are in the 

public interest, it is 

ORDERED that the Settlement 

Agreement be, and is, hereby, accepted; 

and it is 

FURTHER ORDERED, that the Firm 

shall comply with the terms of the 

Settlement Agreement and shall pay a 

civil penalty of four million three 

hundred thousand dollars 

(US$4,300,000.00), within twenty 

calendar days after receiving service of 

the Commission’s final Order accepting 

the Settlement Agreement. Upon failure 

of the Firm to make the foregoing 

payment when due, interest on the 

unpaid amount shall accrue and be paid 

by the Firm at the federal legal rate of 

interest set forth at 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a) 

and (b). If the Firm fails to make such 

a payment or to comply in full with any 

other provision as set forth in the 

Settlement Agreement, such conduct 

will be considered a violation of the 

Settlement Agreement and Order. 

Provisionally accepted and provisional 

Order issued on the 27th day of October, 

2014. 

By Order of the Commission: 

lllllllllllllllllllll

Todd A. Stevenson, Secretary, 

U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2014–25818 Filed 10–29–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6355–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Docket ID: DoD–2014–OS–0056] 

Submission for OMB Review; 

Comment Request 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense 

has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 

following proposal for collection of 

information under the provisions of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act. 

DATES: Consideration will be given to all 

comments received by December 1, 

2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred 

Licari, 571–372–0493. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Title, Associated Form and OMB 

Number: Police Record Check; DD Form 

369; OMB Control Number 0704–0007. 

Type of Request: Revision. 

Number of Respondents: 175,000. 

Responses per Respondent: 1. 

Annual Responses: 175,000. 

Average Burden per Response: 27 

minutes. 

Annual Burden Hours: 78,750. 

Needs and Uses: The information 

collection requirement is necessary, per 

Sections 504, 505 and 12102, Title 10 

U.S. Code, to identify persons who may 

be undesirable for military service. 

Applicants for enlistment must be 

screened to identify any discreditable 

involvement with police or other law 

enforcement agencies. The DD Form 

369, ‘‘Police Record Check’’ is 

forwarded to law enforcement agencies 

to identify if applicant has a record. 

Affected Public: Individuals or 

households; State or local government 

agencies. 

Frequency: On occasion. 

Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary. 

OMB Desk Officer: Ms. Jasmeet 

Seehra. 

Written comments and 

recommendations on the proposed 

information collection should be sent to 

Ms. Jasmeet Seehra at the Office of 

Management and Budget, Desk Officer 

for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive 

Office Building, Washington, DC 20503. 

You may also submit comments, 

identified by docket number and title, 

by the following method: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Instructions: All submissions received 

must include the agency name, docket 

number and title for this Federal 

Register document. The general policy 

for comments and other submissions 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES