alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 163.110 Cacao nibs. ( a ) *Description.* ( 1 ) Cacao nibs is the food prepared by removing the shell from cured, cleaned, dried, and cracked cacao beans. The cacao shell content is not more than 1.75 percent by weight, calculated on an alkali free basis, as determined by the method prescribed in § 163.5(a).
( 2 ) The cacao nibs, or the cacao beans from which they are prepared, may be processed by heating with one or more of the optional alkali ingredients specified in paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
( 3 ) The cacao nibs, or the cacao beans from which they are prepared, as appropriate, may be further processed with one or more of the optional neutralizing agents specified in paragraph (b)(2) of this section.
( b ) *Optional ingredients.* The following safe and suitable ingredients may be used: ( 1 ) Alkali ingredients. Ammonium, potassium, or sodium bicarbonate, carbonate, or hydroxide, or magnesium carbonate or oxide, added as such, or in aqueous solution. For each 100 parts by weight of cacao nibs, used as such, or before shelling from the cacao beans, the total quantity of alkali ingredients used is not greater in neutralizing value (calculated from the respective combined weights of the alkali ingredients used) than the neutralizing value of 3 parts by weight of anhydrous potassium carbonate.
( 2 ) Neutralizing agents. Phosphoric acid, citric acid, and *L*-tartaric acid, added as such, or in aqueous solution. For each 100 parts by weight of cacao nibs, used as such, or before shelling from the cacao beans, the total quantity of phosphoric acid used is not greater than 0.5 part by weight, expressed as P2O5. The total amount, singly or in combination, of citric acid and *L*-tartaric acid is not greater than 1.0 part by weight.
( c ) *Nomenclature.* The name of the food is “cacao nibs”, “cocoa nibs”, or “cracked cocoa”. ( 1 ) When the cacao nibs, or the cacao beans from which they are prepared, are processed with alkali ingredients specified in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, the name of the food shall be accompanied by the statement “Processed with alkali” or “Processed with ______”, the blank being filled in with the common or usual name of the specific alkali ingredient used in the food.
( 2 ) When the cacao nibs, or the cacao beans from which they are prepared, are processed with neutralizing agents specified in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, the name of the food shall be accompanied by the statement “Processed with neutralizing agent” or “Processed with ______”, the blank being filled in with the common or usual name of the specific neutralizing agent used in the food.
( 3 ) Whenever the name of the food appears on the label so conspicuously as to be easily seen under customary conditions of purchase, the statements prescribed in paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of this section shall precede or follow the name without intervening printed or graphic matter.
( d ) *Label declaration.* Each of the ingredients used in the food shall be declared on the label as required by the applicable sections of parts 101 and 130 of this chapter.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON
PAGES 3 AND 4 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE SEPTEMBER 30,
1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             688
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,176
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,239
<INVENTORY>                                        429
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,574
<PP&E>                                           7,741
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,522
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,987
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,066
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,653
<COMMON>                                        61,769
<OTHER-SE>                                    (48,378)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,987
<SALES>                                         19,541
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,541
<CGS>                                            8,379
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,379
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,962
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,100
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (268)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,568)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (205)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,363)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,363)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.15)
        

</TABLE>
#### Christie v. Greenleaf

*Ada A. Christie,*for plaintiff.

*Milton S. Leidner,*for defendant.

October 18,1951.

Bok, P. J.,

— This is a petition for a rehearing on preliminary objections to a bill of complaint. Such objections were at first sustained but the order was vacated and the case was remanded to the law side. This petition was then allowed.

We still see no cause of action, either in equity or at law. Plaintiff has sharpened her position by advising us in her brief that while the obnoxious words addressed to her by defendant were, at least in part, slanderous per se, she specifically does not wish to avail herself of an action for defamation. She chooses to stand entirely upon the right of privacy, which she alleges has been breached by defendant’s making her the butt of billingsgate, harsh names and insulting gestures.

Plaintiff can point to no authority to sustain her position. Her entire argument is that the right to be *192let alone is a natural one, protected by natural law, and hence deserving of a remedy.

There is indeed a right of privacy and it has been recognized in this 'State. It clearly does not, however, extend to the sort of bad manners attributed to this defendant, but is restricted to such invasions as broadcasting photographs and letters, tapping telephone wires, and the like. A broad and general publicity is indicated rather than a limited, if public, demonstration like the one before us. The distinction appears to be between demonstrations made *to*the public and those made *in*public. It would be exceedingly dangerous to make bad manners actionable, since the line between them and the sort of harmful hostility that is now known as actionable defamation would be almost impossible to draw. In a sense the line has already been drawn to include as actionable only what the law calls libel and slander. Anything short of that must be considered as one of the many annoyances to the jfitizenry that are known as damnum absque injuria. (A thick hide must take the place of legal protection where the field of protection is obscure.

Plaintiff having, arguendo, an action for slander, as well as the right to have defendant arrested for disorderly conduct, is not without her remedy, and we see no warrant for fashioning the new one she requests.

After this rehearing was granted, the case of Lisowski, etc., et vir v. Jaskiewicz et vir, 76 D. & C. 79 (1951), was decided by Judge Crumlish. The facts are almost identical, and Judge Crumlish has so thoroughly discussed such authorities as there are that it is needless to repeat what he said in denying relief.

The preliminary objections are sustained and the bill is dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheets of the Corporation at December 31, 1997 and the
consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 1997 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      21,095,635
<SECURITIES>                                 3,499,691
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,021,737
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,041,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            43,429,752
<PP&E>                                      67,025,780
<DEPRECIATION>                              12,932,032
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             126,809,198
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       35,763,589
<BONDS>                                     89,854,612
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       226,353
<OTHER-SE>                                 125,661,323
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               126,809,198
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            73,018,004
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               63,504,031
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            43,793,014
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             2,733,220
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          12,450,343
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (43,043,673)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (43,043,673)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (43,043,673)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.90)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.90)<F1>
<FN>
<F1> There was no change in primary and diluted EPS for 1995 and 1996 as
    a result of the adoption of SFAS 128.
</FN>




</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.4


Board of Directors
fine.com International Corp.

Members of the Board:

        We hereby consent to the inclusion of our opinion letter to the Board of
Directors of fine.com International Corp. as Annex B to the proxy
statement/prospectus constituting a part of the Registration Statement on Form
S-4 relating to the proposed merger transaction involving fine.com and ARIS
Corporation and references thereto in such proxy statement/prospectus under the
captions "SUMMARY - Opinion of fine.com's Financial Advisor", "THE MERGER -
Background of the Merger"; THE MERGER - fine.com's Reasons for the Merger", and
"THE MERGER - Opinion of Financial Advisor to fine.com". In giving such consent,
we do not admit that we come within the category of persons whose consent is
required under, and we do not admit that we are "experts" for purposes of, the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated
thereunder.



                                           /s/ Ragen MacKenzie Incorporated
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

NICOLE MURPHY,

Appellant,

v.

BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation; MAXINE 

POTTER, an individual; TROY STRATOS, an individual; RICHARD 

HACK, an individual; and LESLIE ZIGEL, an individual,

Appellees.

No. 4D17-1512

[April 26, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Carol-Lisa Phillips, Judge; L.T. Case No. 11-10614 (25).

Scott A. Weires of Murdoch, Weires, Neuman, Boca Raton, for 

appellant.

Sara F. Holladay-Tobias and Emily Rottmann of McGuireWoods LLP, 

Jacksonville, for appellee Bank of America Corporation.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., DAMOORGIAN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### § 507.37 Provision of assurances required under § 507.36(a)(2), (3), and (4).

A facility that provides a written assurance under § 507.36(a)(2), (3), or (4) must act consistently with the assurance and document its actions taken to satisfy the written assurance.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Surface Transportation Board

The Surface Transportation Board has received a request from Covington & Burling on behalf of Union Pacific Corporation (WB468-11-1/8/10), for permission to use certain data from the Board's 2008 Carload Waybill Sample. A copy of the request may be obtained from the Office of Economics, Environmental Analysis, and Administration.

The waybill sample contains confidential railroad and shipper data; therefore, if any parties object to these requests, they should file their objections with the Director of the Board's Office of Economics, Environmental Analysis, and Administration within 14 calendar days of the date of this notice. The rules for release of waybill data are codified at 49 CFR 1244.9.

*Contact:*                     Scott Decker, (202) 245-0330.                

Jeffrey Herzig,

Clearance Clerk.

[FR Doc. 2010-4157 Filed 2-26-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
#### § 1402.4 Information classified by another agency.

When a request is received for information that was classified by another agency, the Director of the Office of Planning, Budget, and Administration of ONDCP will forward the request and a copy of the document(s) along with any other related materials, to the appropriate agency for review and determination as to release. Recommendations as to release or denial may be made if appropriate. The requester will be notified of the referral, unless the receiving agency objects on the grounds that its association with the information requires protection.
Exhibit 21.1

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

Name                                                      State of Incorporation
----------------------------------------------            ----------------------

Technology Service Group, Inc.                            Delaware
Elcotel Direct, Inc.                                      Delaware
Public Communication - I Corporation                      Delaware
International Service Technologies, Inc. (a
  subsidiary of Technology Service Group, Inc.)           Delaware
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTH CI RCUI T MARCH 10, 2011 J OHN L EY CL ERK [ D O N O T P U B L I S H ]

I N T H E U N I T E D S T A T E S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C I R C U I T

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ N o

. 1 0

- 1 1 6 8 2 N o n - A r g u m e n t C a l e n d a r

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ D

. C

. D o c k e t N o

. 3 : 0 9

- c r - 0 0 1 1 1

- R V

- 1

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A ,
P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e ,

v e r s u s
A L I R I O S I L V A

- M O N T O Y A ,
D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ A p p e a l f r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e N o r t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f F l o r i d a

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ( M a r c h 1 0 , 2 0 1 1 )

B e f o r e T J O F L A T , C A R N E S a n d B A R K E T T , C i r c u i t J u d g e s

.
P E R C U R I A M :
G w e n d o l y n S p i v e y , a p p o i n t e d c o u n s e l f o r A l i r i o S i l v a - M o n t o y a i n t h i s
d i r e c t c r i m i n a l a p p e a l , h a s f i l e d a m o t i o n t o w i t h d r a w f r o m f u r t h e r r e p r e s e n t a t i o no f t h e a p p e l l a n t , b e c a u s e c o u n s e l b e l i e v e s t h a t t h e a p p e a l i s w i t h o u t m e r i t

. C o u n s e l

h a s f i l e d a b r i e f p u r s u a n t t o A n d e r s v

. C a l i f o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 , 8 7 S

. C t

. 1 3 9 6 , 1 8

L

. E d

. 2 d 4 9 3 ( 1 9 6 7 )

. O u r i n d e p e n d e n t r e v i e w o f t h e r e c o r d r e v e a l s t h a t c o u n s e l ’ s a s s e s s m e n t o f

t h e r e l a t i v e m e r i t o f t h e a p p e a l i s c o r r e c t

. B e c a u s e i n d e p e n d e n t e x a m i n a t i o n o f t h e

e n t i r e r e c o r d r e v e a l s n o a r g u a b l y m e r i t o r i o u s i s s u e s o f m e r i t , c o u n s e l ’ s m o t i o n t o

w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D , a n d S i l v a - M o n t o y a ’ s c o n v i c t i o n a n d s e n t e n c e a r e
A F F I R M E D

.

2
# C_2014245EN.01000201.xml

| 28.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 245/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 245/2

---

Appeal brought on 13 January 2014 by Associazione sportiva Taranto calcio Srl against the order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 19 November 2013 in Case T-476/13 Associazione sportiva Taranto calcio Srl v Italian Republic

(Case C-11/14 P)

2014/C 245/02

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Associazione sportiva Taranto calcio Srl (represented by: N. Russo, avvocato)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Italian Republic

Other party to the proceedings:

By order of 30 April 2014, the Court of Justice (Sixth Chamber) dismissed the appeal.

---
§ 4.105 What are the postmarketing safety reporting recordkeeping requirements for your combination product or constituent part? ( a ) If you are a constituent part applicant: ( 1 ) You must maintain records in accordance with the recordkeeping requirements in the applicable regulation(s) described in § 4.102(b).
( 2 ) You must maintain records required under § 4.103(b) for the longest time period required for records under the postmarketing safety reporting regulations applicable to your product under § 4.102(b).
( b ) If you are a combination product applicant, you must maintain records in accordance with the longest time period required for records under the regulations applicable to your product under § 4.102.
1 Kiski Avenue Raymond J. Polinski

Leechburg, PA 15656 GM- Silicon Steels Phone: 724-845-0259 E-mail: rjpolinski@alleghenyludlum.com July 7, 2005
RE: Price Announcement To our valued customers: Effective with shipments beginning August 1, 2005, ATI Allegheny Ludlum is increasing prices for grain-oriented silicon electrical steel products by approximately 26%. All surcharges for grain-oriented steel remain in effect. This increase is necessary for capital investment and profitable growth. We appreciate your business and continued support. If you have questions, please contact your ATI Allegheny Ludlum sales representative. Sincerely yours,
Raymond J. Polinski 1Kiski Avenue Leechburg, P A 15656 Phone: 724-845-0259 E-mail: rjpolinski@alleghenyludlum.com



### RE: PriceAnnouncement To our valued customers: July 7,2005 RaymondJ. Polinski GM- Silicon Steels

Effective with shipments beginning August 1,2005, ATI Allegheny Ludlum is increasing prices for grain-oriented silicon electrical steel products by approximately 26%. All surcharges for grain-oriented steel remain in effect. This increase is necessary for capital investment and profitable growth. We appreciate your business and continued support. Ifyou have questions, please contact yourATI Allegheny Ludlum sales representative. Sincerely yours,
Raymond J. Polinski
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 21

- 00007

- CV

I N THE I NTEREST OF M.S., A C HILD §

§

§

§ O n Appeal from the 233rd District Court

of Tarrant County ( 233

- 585880

- 15 )

May 6 , 2021

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Womack

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

SECO ND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Dana Womack

Justice Dana Womack
Office of Inspector General 

U.S. Department of Homeland Security 

Washington, DC 20528 

Office of Inspector General 

DHS Requires Additional Processes and Controls Over Its National Security Systems 

OIG-05-09 

Since many of the DHS organizational components have established computer systems to access, 

process, and store classified national security information, we performed an audit of DHS’ national 

security systems. The overall objective of the audit was to determine whether DHS and its 

organizational components have implemented adequate security to protect their national security 

systems. We performed our work at the program and organizational component levels. We reviewed 

national security systems policies and procedures and conducted vulnerability assessments and 

security control reviews for a sample of national security systems at six DHS organizational 

components. 

Our audit was conducted between April 2004 and August 2004. We recommended that DHS take 

certain steps to: (1) provide adequate security for the information and information systems that support 

its classified operations and assets; and (2) ensure the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of vital 

classified information. DHS concurred with our recommendations. We are posting only this summary 

on the OIG website because the report contains classified information and should not, consequently, 

be widely disseminated.