alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014235EN.01000301.xml

| 21.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/3

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 10 April 2014 — Ralph Prankl

(Case C-175/14)

2014/C 235/04

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Verwaltungsgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Ralph Prankl

Applicant:

Defendant: Bundesfinanzgericht

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Are Article 7(1) and (2) and Article 9(1) of Council Directive 92/12/EEC of 25 February 1992 on the general arrangements for products subject to excise duty and on the holding, movement and monitoring of such products (1) (OJ 1992 L 76, p. 1), as amended by Council Directive 92/108/EEC (2) of 14 December 1992 (OJ 1992 L 390, p. 1), to be interpreted as precluding national provisions which provide that where excise goods (cigarettes) have been released for consumption in a (first) Member State and, without an accompanying document in accordance with Article 7(4) of that directive, have been transported by land to another Member State (Member State of destination) through one or more other Member States (transit Member States) in order to be sold in the Member State of destination, excise duty (tobacco duty) is charged also in a transit Member State?

1

2

---

(1)  OJ 1992 L 76, p. 1.

1

(2)  Council Directive 92/108/EEC of 14 December 1992 amending Directive 92/12/EEC on the general arrangements for products subject to excise duty and on the holding, movement and monitoring of such products and amending Directive 92/81/EEC; OJ 1992 L 390, p. 124.

2

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

ROCKTENN CP, LLC, a Delaware §

c orporation, and ROCKTENN § No. 120, 2014 SHARED SERVICES, LLC, a Georgia § limited liability company, § § Defendants

- B elow

, § Court Below: Court of Chancery Appellant s , § of the State of Delaware §

v. § C.A. No. 8837 (VCL) § BE&K ENGINEERING COMPANY

, § LLC, n/k/a KBR ENGINEERING § COMPANY, LLC, a Delaware corporation, § § Plaintiff

- Below, § Appellee. §

Submitted: October 15 , 2014 Decided: October 16 , 2014

Before STRINE , Chief Justice, HOLLAND

, RIDGELY

, and VALIHURA

, Justices;
and RYAN

, Judge

, constituting the Court en Banc

.
Upon appeal from the Court of Chancery

. AFFIRMED

. John T. Dorsey, Esquire, Martin S. Lessner , Esquire, Mary F. Dugan, Esquire, Emily V. Burton, Esquire, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; C. Walker Ingraham, Esquire, Anna R. Palmer, Esquire, Esther Slater McDonald, Esquire, Sara M. LeClerc, Esquire, Seyfarth Shaw LLP, Atl anta, Georgia ; Rebecca Woods, Esquire ( argued ) , Seyfarth Shaw LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellants.

Joseph R. Slights, III, Esquire, Jason C. Jowers, Esquire, Elizabeth A. Powers, Esquire, Morris James LLP, Wilmington, Del a ware; Jonathan R. Friedman, Esq uire, Robert P. Marcovitch, Esquire ( argued ) , Weinberg, Wheeler, Hudgins, Gunn & Dial, LLC, Atlanta, Georgia for Appellee.

STRINE , Chief Justice:

Sitting by designation under Del. Const. art. IV, § 12.The appellant s raise a novel issue for the first time on appeal . They claim that a

trial court , in considering whether to grant an injunction against a litigant pressing claims

in another forum in arguable violation of an exclusi ve forum provision

, may not consider

factual statements made by the defendant in pleadings and affidavits in that

simultaneou sly pending litigation as binding judicial admissions. The appellants bring

this argument even though they have not retract ed those statements

, and

, in fact

, repeat ed

many of them to the trial court. This is an interesting issue that raises arguments not

considered by this Court before. In a commercial dispute like this that does not involve

fundamental rights, like child custody or a criminal defendant’s liberty, the interests of

justice would be disserved, not furthered , by allowing the appellant s to r aise this issue for

the first time on appeal. Thus, we will not consider that argument.

Based on the arguments and record properly presented to the Court of Chancery,

we conclude that the Court of Chancery should be affirmed on the basis of its thorough

opinion of January 15, 2014

. 1 The appellants’ contention that expensive discovery might

reveal a state of events where the appellee unwittingly provided work under some

unspecified contract

– a contract other tha n the one that the appellants themselves said

was central to the parties’ relationship

– was not sufficient to generate a genuine issue of

fact to preclude summary judgment.

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the Court of Chancery is hereby

AFFIRMED.

1 BE&K Engineering Company, LLC v. RockTenn CP, LLC , 2014 WL 186835 (Del. Ch. Jan. 15, 2014)

.
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7377 

AN ACT 

To amend the Federal Oil and Gas Royalty Management 

Act of 1982 to improve the management of royalties 

from oil and gas leases, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 7377 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Royalty Resiliency 

3 Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DETERMINATION OF ALLOCATIONS OF PRODUC5 TION FOR UNITS AND COMMUNITIZATION 

6 AGREEMENTS. 

7 Section 111(j) of the Federal Oil and Gas Royalty 

8 Management Act of 1982 (30 U.S.C. 1721(j)), as amend9 ed by the Federal Oil and Gas Royalty Simplification and 

10 Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–185), is amended 

11 to read as follows: 

12 ‘‘(j) The Secretary shall issue all determinations of 

13 allocations of production for units and communitization 

14 agreements within 120 days of a request for determina15 tion. Until the Secretary issues the determination, the les16 see or its designee of a lease in a unit or communitization 

17 agreement shall report and pay royalties on oil and gas 

18 production for each production month in accordance with 

19 the terms of the proposed allocation of production for the 

20 unit or communitization agreement. After the Secretary 

21 issues the determination, the lessee or its designee shall, 

22 as necessary, correct such reports and the amount of roy23 alties paid on oil and gas production under the unit or 

24 communitization agreement by not later than the end of 

25 the third month following the month in which the lessee 

26 or its designee receives the determination from the Sec-
3 

•HR 7377 EH

1 retary. Subject to the full and timely monthly payment 

2 of royalties to all parties in accordance with the terms of 

3 the proposed allocation of production for the unit or 

4 communitization agreement, the Secretary shall waive in5 terest due on obligations subject to the determination until 

6 the end of the third month following the month in which 

7 the lessee or its designee receives the determination from 

8 the Secretary. This subsection shall not apply to unit or 

9 communization agreements containing Indian lands.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 22, 2024. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7377 

AN ACT 

To amend the Federal Oil and Gas Royalty Manpurposes. of royalties from oil and gas leases, and for other agement Act of 1982 to improve the management
§ 522.690 Dinoprost. ( a ) *Specifications.* Each milliliter (mL) of solution contains dinoprost tromethamine equivalent to: ( 1 ) 5 milligrams (mg) dinoprost; or
( 2 ) 12.5 mg dinoprost.
( b ) *Sponsors.* See sponsors in § 510.600(c) of this chapter as follows: ( 1 ) Nos. 054771 and 061133 for use of product described in paragraph (a)(1) as in paragraph (d) of this section.
( 2 ) No. 054771 for use of product described in paragraph (a)(2) as in paragraph (d)(1) of this section.
( c ) *Special considerations.* Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian.
( d ) *Conditions of use* — ( 1 ) *Cattle.* Administer products described in paragraph (a) of this section as follows: ( i ) *Amount.* 25 mg as an intramuscular injection of the 5 mg/mL product or as an intramuscular or subcutaneous injection of the 12.5 mg/mL product.
( ii ) *Indications for use.* As a luteolytic agent; effective only in those cattle having a corpus luteum, *i.e.,* those which ovulated at least 5 days prior to treatment. ( A ) For estrus synchronization in beef cows, beef heifers and replacement dairy heifers.
( B ) For unobserved (silent) estrus in lactating dairy cows with a corpus luteum.
( C ) For treatment of pyometra (chronic endometritis) in cattle.
( D ) For abortion in beef cows, beef heifers and replacement dairy heifers.
( E ) For use with gonadorelin injection as in § 522.1077 of this chapter to synchronize estrous cycles to allow fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI) in lactating dairy cows.
( F ) For use with progesterone intravaginal inserts as in § 529.1940 of this chapter for synchronization of estrus in lactating dairy cows.
( G ) For use with progesterone intravaginal inserts as in § 529.1940 of this chapter for synchronization of estrus in suckled beef cows and replacement beef and dairy heifers, advancement of first postpartum estrus in suckled beef cows, and advancement of first pubertal estrus in beef heifers.
( 2 ) *Horses.* Administer product described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section as follows: ( i ) *Amount.* 1 mg per 100 pounds of body weight as a single intramuscular injection.
( ii ) *Indications for use.* ( A ) For controlling the timing of estrus in estrous cycling mares.
( B ) For difficult-to-breed mares (clinically anestrous mares that have a corpus luteum).
( iii ) *Limitations.* Do not use in horses intended for human consumption.
( 3 ) *Swine.* Administer product described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section as follows: ( i ) *Amount.* 10 mg as a single intramuscular injection.
( ii ) *Indications for use.* For parturition induction in swine.
[67 FR 41824, June 20, 2002, as amended at 79 FR 16187, Mar. 25, 2014; 79 FR 44278, July 31, 2014; 79 FR 64116, Oct. 28, 2014; 80 FR 61296, Oct. 13, 2015; 80 FR 76386, Dec. 9, 2015; 81 FR 36789, June 8, 2016; 84 FR 8973, Mar. 13, 2019; 87 FR 17945, Mar. 29, 2022]
650

650

650

650

650

Lake Superior

Lake Superior

Lake Superior

Michigan

Island

Light

Gull

Island

Light

Gull

Island

Michigan

Island

Sand

Point

Amnicon

Point

Michigan

Island

Stockton

Island

Cat

Island

Outer

Island

Michigan

Island

OE S

6

6

52

51

25'

97

30' 1

XN

96

FEET

98

XM

000m

51

51

30"

000m

000m

30"

000m

30"

01

97

04

22'

96 97

N

91

52

6 6

1

52

52

27'

55'

99

08

98

850

93

92

N

6 6 30"

51

6

57 57' '

90°

90°

90°

51

870

06

00

52'

30"

05

99

52

6

52

6

6

52

51

000

95

00

07

07

30'

95

XN

52'

XM

03

000 00'

99

93 95

94

94

6

52

90°

52

51

55'

52

52

47°

46°

00' FEET

06

02

05

FEET

000

91 95 97

XM

52

52

6

51

6

52

52

47°

52

30"

6

51

52

000

01

FEET

660

E 22'

30"

03

6 E 92 98

98

YM 6

52

6

27'

6

46°

25'

02

30"

04

96

08

630

96

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

WISCONSIN

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

MICHIGAN ISLAND, WI

2010

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Interstate Route US Route State Route

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

MICHIGAN ISLAND QUADRANGLE

WISCONSIN

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

Zone 15T

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator,

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Wisconsin Coordinate System of 1983

(north zone)

Imagery................................NAIP, June 2005 - August 2008

Roads..............................................©2006-2010 Tele Atlas

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2008

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 2005

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 2002

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

This map was produced to conform with version 0.5.10 of the

draft USGS Standards for 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Maps.

A metadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.5.11

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0 1

MILES

MN 1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

GN

UTM GRID AND 2010 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

1° 52 ́

33 MILS

2° 6 ́

37 MILS

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

15T

XM

XN

YM

52 00

7 00

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988
# C_2019418EN.01000101.xml

| 11.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 418/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 418/1

---

DECISION

(2019/C 418/01)

THE SECRETARY-GENERAL OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,

| — | HAVING REGARD TO Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 (1), as amended, in particular, by Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1023/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2013 amending the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union (2) and, in particular, Article 30 of those Staff Regulations, |
| --- | --- |

—

HAVING REGARD TO Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 (1), as amended, in particular, by Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1023/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2013 amending the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union (2) and, in particular, Article 30 of those Staff Regulations,

| — | HAVING REGARD TO the Bureau Decision of 13 January 2014 on the delegation of the powers of the appointing authority and of the authority empowered to conclude contracts of employment (AECE), |
| --- | --- |

—

HAVING REGARD TO the Bureau Decision of 13 January 2014 on the delegation of the powers of the appointing authority and of the authority empowered to conclude contracts of employment (AECE),

| — | HAVING REGARD TO the expiry, on 31 December 2019, of the following European Parliament reserve lists:
  PE/168/S, PE/171/S, PE/185/S, PE/186/S, PE/191/S, AD/1/13, AD/1/16, AD/2/16 (P), AST/4/11 (P), AST/1/13, AST/1/16, AST/2/16 (P), |
| --- | --- |

—

HAVING REGARD TO the expiry, on 31 December 2019, of the following European Parliament reserve lists:

PE/168/S, PE/171/S, PE/185/S, PE/186/S, PE/191/S, AD/1/13, AD/1/16, AD/2/16 (P), AST/4/11 (P), AST/1/13, AST/1/16, AST/2/16 (P),

| — | HAVING REGARD TO the opinion of the Joint Committee issued at its meeting of 16 October 2019, |
| --- | --- |

—

HAVING REGARD TO the opinion of the Joint Committee issued at its meeting of 16 October 2019,

HAS DECIDED:

Article 1

The period of validity of the following reserve lists:

PE/168/S, PE/171/S, PE/186/S, AD/1/16, AD/2/16 (P), AST/1/13, AST/1/16, AST/2/16 (P)

shall be extended until 31 December 2020.

Article 2

The period of validity of the following reserve lists:

AD/1/13, PE/185/S, PE/191/S, AST/4/11 (P)

shall not be extended.

Luxembourg, 8 November 2019.

Klaus WELLE

Secretary-General

---

(1)  OJ L 56, 4.3.1968, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 287, 29.10.2013, p. 15.

2

---
<PAGE>   1

                                   EXHIBIT 21

                          SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                     SHAREHOLDINGS AT
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                                    JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION      YEAR END
------------------                                    -----------------------------  ----------------
<S>                                                   <C>                            <C>
MFC Merchant Bank S.A...............................  Switzerland                           100%
MFC Securities Group of Companies...................  Switzerland                           100%
West F.C. Finance Corp..............................  British Columbia, Canada              100%
Constitution Insurance Company of Canada............  Canada                                100%
Logan International Corp............................  State of Washington                    71%
Drummond Financial Corporation......................  State of Delaware                    49.4%(1)
ICHOR Corporation...................................  State of Delaware                    72.8%(2)
</TABLE>

---------------

(1) The Company owns 60,000 voting preferred shares of Drummond Financial
    Corporation ("Drummond") which gives the Company, in the aggregate, control
    of 76% of the voting power in Drummond.

(2) MFC Merchant Bank S.A. directly owns the shares of ICHOR Corporation. As at
    May 6, 1999, the Company shares dispositive and voting power with respect to
    approximately 81% of ICHOR Corporation based on the assumed conversion of
    402,500 preferred shares of ICHOR Corporation, based on a conversion price
    of U.S.$1.99. These shares are temporary investments held for resale.
§ 510.212 Administrative reconsideration of action. ( a ) The Commissioner may at any time, on his or her own initiative or on the petition of an interested person under part 10 of this chapter, reconsider part or all of a decision to establish, not establish, amend, or revoke an import tolerance.
( b ) A petition for reconsideration must be submitted in accordance with § 10.20 of this chapter and in the form specified in § 10.33 of this chapter no later than 30 days after the date of public notification of the decision involved. The Commissioner may, for good cause, permit a petition to be filed more than 30 days after public notification of the decision. The petition for reconsideration must demonstrate that relevant information contained in the administrative record was not previously or not adequately considered by the Commissioner. No new information may be included in a petition for reconsideration.
( c ) An interested person who wishes to rely on information not included in the administrative record shall submit either a petition to amend an import tolerance under § 510.205 or to revoke an import tolerance under § 510.210 and § 10.25 of this chapter.
<PAGE>   1
HAWAII NATIONAL BANCSHARES, INC.

NEWS RELEASE                                       August 31, 1999

Contact:       Warren K.K. Luke
               President and Chief Executive Officer
               (808) 528-7711

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

SHAREHOLDERS APPROVE HAWAII NATIONAL BANCSHARES, INC. GOING-PRIVATE PLAN

        HONOLULU - Hawaii National Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company") announced
today that at its Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on August 31, 1999, the
Company's shareholders approved a "Going-Private Plan" proposed by the Board of
Directors. Said President and Chief Executive Officer, Warren K.K. Luke, "We are
pleased that our shareholders affirmed our Board's vision for the future. Taking
the Company private will allow us to adopt a longer-term planning horizon and be
more responsive to the community as well as our employees without having many of
the costs and pressures that public companies often face."

        The plan approved by the Company's shareholders involved a one-for-200
reverse stock split, which had the effect of reducing the number of shareholders
to a level below the threshold requiring registration with the Securities and
Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Following the plan's approval, the Company filed
amended Articles of Incorporation with the State of Hawaii to effect the reverse
stock split and a notice with the SEC to deregister the Company's common stock.

        The Company is mailing instructions to its shareholders for the reverse
stock split. Each shareholder will receive a single new share for each 200
shares currently owned. No new fractional shares will be issued; instead,
shareholders will receive cash for those less-than-whole portions on a pro-rata
basis of $45.00 per pre-split share (without commissions). The Company received
an opinion from the investment banking firm of Banc of America Securities LLC
(formerly known as NationsBanc Montgomery Securities LLC) that the $45.00 per
pre-split share price was fair to shareholders from a financial point of view.

        Also on August 31, 1999, the Company's tender offer to its shareholders
concluded. The tender offer was an element of the Company's Going-Private Plan,
and was implemented in order to allow Company shareholders owning more than 200
shares the chance to receive cash on the same economic terms as apply to
shareholders in the reverse stock split.

                                     (more)


<PAGE>   2


        Hawaii National Bancshares, Inc. is the parent company of Hawaii
National Bank (the "Bank"), one of the last independent community banks in
Hawaii and the only one to hold a federal charter and belong to the Federal
Reserve System. The Going-Private Plan will not affect banking supervision or
deposit insurance. The bank holding company will continue to be regulated by the
Federal Reserve Board and the Bank will continue to be regulated by the Office
of the Comptroller of the Currency. Additionally, customer deposits will
continue to be FDIC-insured up to $100,000 per depositor.

                                      ####
### SERVED: MARCH 11, 2016 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF BUSH AIR CARGO, INC. DOCKETNO. FAA-2016-4263 (Civil Penalty Action)



### NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2015WP910102) I:tas been assigned to Administrative Law Judge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served onthe Judge, the FAAHearing Docket, and the other persons onthe attached Service List.

Attachment- Service List

### SERVICELIST- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & 

### ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1

# ooo 1



### BartonM. Tierman President and General Counsel Bush Air Cargo, Inc., Respondent 

### P.O. Box 93144 Anchorage, AK 99509 1EL: 907-277-7657 Kyle Lomazow, Complainant's Counsel 

### Attn: Patricia L. Baysinger Federal Aviation Administration EnforcementDivision Western Team 222 West 7th Avenue, Box 14 Anchorage, AK 99513-7587 TEL: 907-271-5264 FAX: 907-271-2800 ONE COPY

Hon. J.E. Sullivan,AdministrativeLawJudge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-6941 FAX: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2016-4263 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was byU.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### -2-