alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
June 1, 1951

Hon. Gordon L. Hollon CountyAttorney Kendallcounty Boerne,

Texas Dear sir: Opinion No. V-1177. Re: Compensation

of a county judge on a fee basis who is also ex officiocounty superintendent.

Your request for an opinion presents

the following

two questions:

1. Does the law requirethe compensation received by a county judge as ex officiocounty school superintendentto be included in the annual report as a portion of the maximum fees to be retained by him? 2. Is the county juage'required to report compensationreceived

as ex officiocounty superintendent adi expenses

collected

by him fop travel? KendallCounty compensates its ccUnt,y

officers

on a fee basis. 'It

has been codstently held in prior opinions of this officethat the compensation received

as ex officiocounty superintendent

by a county judge compensated on a fee basis must be inelu&zd in computfng his maximum compensation, and the county judge is not eptitled

to compensation

as ex officiocounty superintendent over and above his maximumallowed. The coudy judgemust account for said ex officiocompensation in arriving

at hM maximum. Att'y &no ops, o-67 (igjg), o-263 (igjg),

o-iglg (lg4,o),

0-3026 (194x), O-5251 <:1943),

o-6365 (194, o-6749 (@+5). It has been likewise held that the traveling expenseallowed the county **judge** as ex officiocounty superintendent should be shown on his monthlyreport as required by Article 3899, V.C+S. Att'y Gen. Op. O-l.277 (1939). You are therefore

in ani3wer

to your first questionadvised that the compensstti alloWe&the county judge as ex officio county s?~perintendent is ts be includedIn computtig his maximum eDmpensat%on

allowed

by law,Hon. Gordon L. Hollon, page 2 (V-1177)

You are advised in answer to your secondquestion that the county judgemust Include in his report,as required by Article 3899, the compensation

and traveling

expensehe has received as ex officio county superintendent. SUMMARY

Compens.+d.on

received

as ex officiocounty superintendent

by a county judge compensated on a fee basis must be included

in computing

his maximum compensation, and the county judge is not entitled to compensation

as ex officiocounty superintendent over and above his maximum allowed

by law. The county judge must include in his report, as required

by Article 3699, the compensation and traveling

expense

he has received

as ex officiocounty superintendent.

Att'y Gen. Ops. o-67 (19X3), 0-263 (1939), O-1919 (l&O), 0-3026 (19&l), O-5251 (1943),

O-6365 (1945), o-6749 (1945). APPROVED: J. C. Davis, Jr. CountyAffairsDivision Jesse P. Luton,Jr. Reviewing

Assistant Charles

D. Mathews First Assistant JR:mw:pwb Yours very truly, PRICE DANIEL Attorney

General
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

### ************************************* Federal Aviation Administration, Complainant 

## * * 

# RECEIVED
NOV 2 5 2013 HEARING DOCKET



## * FAADocketFAA-2013-0715 v. Airport Mailers, Inc., Respondent 

## * 

# * * * * 

## *-************************************ Administrative Law Judge J.E. Sullivan FAA Case No. 2012S0700256 DMS No. FAA-2013-0715

WITHDRAWAL OF COMPLAINT

Comes now the Complainant, pursuant to Section 13.215 ofthe Rules ofPractice in FAA Civil Penalty Actions, and in view ofthe submission ofa signed promissory note and settlement reached bythe parties, hereby withdraws the Complaint inthe referenced matter. There will, therefore, be no issues for litigation for the as yet unscheduled hearing. The Cmp.plainantrequests that the Administrative Law Judge dismiss the proceedings. 

# I .q-t"'- Respectfully submitted this_day ofNovember, 2013.

ames H. Dunfee, J

. Attorney Office ofthe Region;li Counsel Southern Region

### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certifY that this Withdrawal ofComplaint has been sent by CERTIFIED AND REGULAR MAIL as indicated below:

Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430, Wilbur Wright Building Suite 2Wl000 Washington, DC 20591

President Airport Mailers, Inc. PO Box2965 Huntersville, NC 28070-2965 

# \()anmru**~** 

# . {&n M

# ~ Donna E. Stanley

### ~ . Legal Assistant 

# nov 2

# o 20:3 Dated
§ 522.460 Cloprostenol. ( a ) *Specifications.* Each milliliter of solution contains cloprostenol sodium equivalent to: ( 1 ) 125 micrograms (μg) of cloprostenol; or
( 2 ) 250 μg of cloprostenol.
( b ) *Sponsors.* See sponsors in § 510.600(c) of this chapter. ( 1 ) No. 000061 for use of product described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section as in paragraphs (c)(1)(i) and (c)(2) of this section.
( 2 ) No. 000061 for use of product described in paragraph (a)(2) as in paragraphs (c)(1)(ii) through (viii) and (c)(2) of this section.
( 3 ) No. 068504 for use of product described in paragraph (a)(2) as in paragraphs (c)(1)(ii) through (vii), (c)(1)(ix), and (c)(2) of this section.
( c ) *Conditions of use in cattle* — ( 1 ) *Amount and indications for use.* ( i ) Administer 375 μg by intramuscular injection to induce abortion in pregnant feedlot heifers from 1 week after mating until 41 ⁄ 2 months of gestation.
( ii ) Administer 500 μg by intramuscular injection for unobserved or non-detected estrus in beef cows, lactating dairy cows, and replacement beef and dairy heifers.
( iii ) Administer 500 μg by intramuscular injection for treatment of pyometra or chronic endometritis in beef cows, lactating dairy cows, and replacement beef and dairy heifers.
( iv ) Administer 500 μg by intramuscular injection for treatment of mummified fetus in beef cows, lactating dairy cows, and replacement beef and dairy heifers.
( v ) Administer 500 μg by intramuscular injection for treatment of luteal cysts in beef cows, lactating dairy cows, and replacement beef and dairy heifers.
( vi ) Administer 500 μg by intramuscular injection for abortion of beef cows, lactating dairy cows, and replacement beef and dairy heifers from 1 week after mating until 5 months of gestation. Not for use in heifers placed in feedlots.
( vii ) Administer 500 μg by intramuscular injection as a single injection regimen or double injection regimen with a second injection 11 days after the first injection, for estrus synchronization in beef cows, lactating dairy cows, and replacement beef and dairy heifers.
( viii ) For use with gonadorelin acetate to synchronize estrous cycles to allow for fixed time artificial insemination (FTAI) in lactating dairy cows: administer to each cow 86 μg gonadorelin by intramuscular injection, followed 6 to 8 days later by 500 μg cloprostenol by intramuscular injection, followed 30 to 72 hours later by 86 μg gonadorelin by intramuscular injection. Gonadorelin acetate as provided in § 522.1077(a)(1) of this chapter.
( ix ) For use with gonadorelin to synchronize estrous cycles to allow for FTAI in lactating dairy cows: administer to each cow by intramuscular injection, followed 6 to 8 days later by 500 μg cloprostenol by intramuscular injection, followed 30 to 72 hours later by gonadorelin by intramuscular injection. Gonadorelin as provided in § 522.1077(a)(1) through (3) of this chapter.
( 2 ) *Limitations.* Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian.
[79 FR 16185, Mar. 25, 2014, as amended at 85 FR 4208, Jan. 24, 2020; 88 FR 84700, Dec. 6, 2023]
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS WHO HAVE FILED AGREEMENTS TO BE APPROVED AS ADEPOSITORY OF TRUST ACCOUNTS AND TO PROVIDE DISHONORED CHECK REPORTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 221, Pa.R.D.E. New 675 Centre I" Bank, aDivision ofOld Dominion Bank Name Change 660 Clarion FCU — Change to 660 Top Tier FCU 518 Standard Bank, PASB — Change to 27 Dollar Bank, FSB 670 Investors Bank —Change to 561 Citizens Bank Platinum Leader Change 631 Wells Fargo Bank, NA -Add 675 Centre I" Bank, aDivision ofOld Dominion Bank - Add Correction Removal

October 2022
irt-ex109_443.htm



Exhibit 10.9

AMENDMENT NO. 1 

Dated as of May 2, 2017

to

INDEPENDENCE REALTY trust, inc.

LONG TERM Incentive Plan

(Amended and Restated as of May 12, 2016)

 

 

Pursuant to Article 15 of the Independence Realty Trust, Inc. Long Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Independence Realty Trust, Inc. desires to amend the Plan and related Awards to allow for a modification of its withholding rules with respect to Federal income and other tax obligations.   Accordingly, effective as of the date set forth above, Section 16.2 the Plan is hereby amended and restated as follows:

 

16.2 WITHHOLDING.  The Company or any Affiliate shall have the authority and the right to deduct or withhold, or require a Participant to remit to the Company, an amount sufficient to satisfy federal, state, and local taxes (including the Participant’s FICA obligation) required by law to be withheld with respect to any exercise, lapse of restriction or other taxable event arising as a result of the Plan.  With respect to withholding required upon any taxable event under the Plan, the Committee may, at the time the Award is granted or thereafter, require or permit that any such withholding requirement be satisfied, in whole or in part, by withholding from the Award Shares having a Fair Market Value on the date of withholding equal to the maximum amount (and not any greater amount) required to be withheld for tax purposes, all in accordance with such procedures as the Committee establishes.  All such elections shall be subject to any restrictions or limitations that the Committee, in its sole discretion, deems appropriate.

To record the adoption of this Amendment No. 1, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has authorized the undersigned to execute this Amendment to be executed as of the date set forth above.  

 

INDEPENDENCE REALTY TRUST, INC.

 

By:  /s/ James J. Sebra

Name:  James J. Sebra

Title:  Chief Financial Officer & Treasurer
EXHIBIT 23

<PAGE>

               [MILLER, MAYER, SULLIVAN & STEVENS LLP LETTERHEAD]
                          CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                     "INNOVATORS OF SOLUTION TECHNOLOGY"SM

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT



The Board of Directors
Harrodsburg First Financial Bancorp, Inc.

We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  registration  statement  (No.
0-26570) on Form S- 8 of Harrodsburg First Financial Bancorp, Inc. of our report
dated  November  29,  1999,  relating  to the  consolidated  balance  sheets  of
Harrodsburg  First  Financial  Bancorp,  Inc. and subsidiary as of September 30,
1999 and 1998, and the related consolidated statements of income,  stockholders'
equity,  and cash  flows for each of the years in the  three-year  period  ended
September 30, 1999,  which report is  incorporated by reference in the September
30, 1999 annual report on Form 10-K of Harrodsburg First Financial Bancorp, Inc.


/s/ Miller, Mayer, Sullivan, & Stevens, LLP

Lexington, Kentucky
December 8, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1997
<CASH>                                             671
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      250
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   921
<PP&E>                                           83165
<DEPRECIATION>                                   43554
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   40532
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           362668
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          3789
<OTHER-SE>                                      575981
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  (684804)
<SALES>                                           3716
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  3716
<CGS>                                             8909
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     8909
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  7974
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                9092
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (22259)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2014052EN.01003201.xml

| 22.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 52/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 52/32

---

Appeal brought on 10 January 2014 by Wünsche Handelsgesellschaft International mbH & Co KG against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 12 November 2013 in Case T-147/12 Wünsche Handelsgesellschaft International mbH & Co KG v European Commission

(Case C-7/14 P)

2014/C 52/58

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Wünsche Handelsgesellschaft International mbH & Co KG (represented by: K. Landry and G. Schwendinger, Rechtsanwälte)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Other party to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | set aside in its entirety the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 12 November 2013 in Case T-147/12 and annul Commission Decision C(2011) 6393 final of 16 September 2011 in Case REM 02/09; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside in its entirety the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 12 November 2013 in Case T-147/12 and annul Commission Decision C(2011) 6393 final of 16 September 2011 in Case REM 02/09;

| — | in the alternative, refer the case back to the General Court for a fresh decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, refer the case back to the General Court for a fresh decision;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Grounds of appeal and main arguments

Grounds of appeal and main arguments

By the first ground of appeal, the appellant claims that the General Court infringed Article 220(2)(b) of the Customs Code (1) in holding that the error on the part of the German customs authorities could have been detected by the appellant. That is untrue. The individual provisions are complex and their wording is unclear and confusing. This is evidenced in particular by correspondence between the Federal Ministry of Finance and the Commission. In addition, the duration and extent of the erroneous practice of the German customs authorities also militate against the contention that the error could have been detected by the appellant.

1

Secondly, the General Court infringed the second indent of Article 239(1) of the Customs Code in erroneously finding that there had been obvious negligence on the part of the appellant.

Thirdly, the General Court failed to give sufficient reasons for its judgment on two points, with the result that the reasoning which it followed in order to arrive at its decision is incomprehensible for the appellant.

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ 1992 L 302, p. 1).

1

---
§ 169.175 Vanilla extract. ( a ) Vanilla extract is the solution in aqueous ethyl alcohol of the sapid and odorous principles extractable from vanilla beans. In vanilla extract the content of ethyl alcohol is not less than 35 percent by volume and the content of vanilla constituent, as defined in § 169.3(c), is not less than one unit per gallon. The vanilla constituent may be extracted directly from vanilla beans or it may be added in the form of concentrated vanilla extract or concentrated vanilla flavoring or vanilla flavoring concentrated to the semisolid form called vanilla oleo-resin. Vanilla extract may contain one or more of the following optional ingredients: ( 1 ) Glycerin.
( 2 ) Propylene glycol.
( 3 ) Sugar (including invert sugar).
( 4 ) Dextrose.
( 5 ) Corn sirup (including dried corn sirup).
( b ) ( 1 ) The specified name of the food is “Vanilla extract” or “Extract of vanilla”.
( 2 ) When the vanilla extract is made in whole or in part by dilution of vanilla oleoresin, concentrated vanilla extract, or concentrated vanilla flavoring, the label shall bear the statement “Made from ______” or “Made in part from ______”, the blank being filled in with the name or names “vanilla oleoresin”, “concentrated vanilla extract”, or “concentrated vanilla flavoring”, as appropriate. If the article contains two or more units of vanilla constituent, the name of the food shall include the designation “__-fold”, the blank being filled in with the whole number (disregarding fractions) expressing the number of units of vanilla constituent per gallon of the article.
( 3 ) Wherever the name of the food appears on the label so conspicuously as to be easily seen under customary conditions of purchase, the labeling required by paragraph (b)(2) of this section shall immediately and conspicuously precede or follow such name, without intervening written, printed, or graphic matter.
( c ) *Label declaration.* Each of the ingredients used in the food shall be declared on the label as required by the applicable sections of parts 101 and 130 of this chapter.
[42 FR 14479, Mar. 15, 1977, as amended at 58 FR 2886, Jan. 6, 1993]
FORM 10-Q

 

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

(X)  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007

 

OR

 

( )  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

for the transition period from  to ____

 

Commission file number 000-21644

 

**CRIMSON EXPLORATION INC.**

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

 

| **Delaware**

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)                                   |   | **20-3037840**

(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                           |   |                                              |
| **717 Texas Avenue, Suite 2900**

**Houston, Texas**

(Address of principal executive offices) |   | **77002**

(zip code)                             |
|                                                                                           |   |                                              |

 

**(713) 236-7400**

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes x  No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer” and “large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

| Large accelerated filer o |   | Accelerated filer o |   | Non-accelerated filer x |
|---------------------------|--------|---------------------|--------|-------------------------|

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes o  No x

 

On August 10, 2007, there were 4,816,709 shares outstanding of the Registrant’s Common Stock, par value $0.001.

 

----
Suite 600, 1901 North Moore Street

Arlington, VA 22209 USA

Phone: (703) 522-0086 • Fax: (703) 522-0548

Email: governmentaffairs@hpba.org

Web Site: www.hpba.org

February 6, 2015

Docket No.: EERE-2014-BT-STD-0036

RIN: 1904-AD35

Mr. John Cymbalsky

U.S. Department of Energy

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

Building Technologies Office, Mailstop EE-5B

1000 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20585-0121

(Via e-mail to john.cymbalsky@ee.doe.gov and HearthHeatingProd2014STD0036@ee.doe.gov)

Re: March 23, 2015 Public Meeting on Energy Conservation Standards for Hearth Products and 

Invitation to 2015 HPBExpo – Docket No.: EERE-2014-BT-STD-0036; RIN: 1904-AD35

Dear Mr. Cymbalsky:

I am writing to thank the Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy (EERE) for moving back the 

Public Meeting for the Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products: Energy Conservation 

Standards for Hearth Products Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. The Hearth, Patio & Barbecue 

Association and its members are extremely interested in the opportunity to provide comments and 

engage in a constructive dialogue on the rulemaking. Your willingness to ensure that the Public Meeting 

noticed in the rulemaking does not directly conflict with 2015 HPBExpo, our annual trade show, is most 

appreciated. 

In the interest of furthering a dialogue on the current or future rulemakings related to “hearth 

products,” HPBA would like to invite you (and/or other appropriate DOE personnel) to visit us at our 

2015 HPBExpo in Nashville, Tenn., to be held March 5-7, 2015. Even a one-day visit would provide an 

unmatched opportunity to view a wide range of products first hand, providing a unique and valuable 

opportunity to gain a better understanding of the various, quite different gas-fired appliances HPBA’s 

members produce.
If you or a member of your staff is interested in attending HPBExpo, please let me know and we will 

work with you on arranging visits an informative tour.

Sincerely,

Ryan Carroll

Director of Government Affairs

Cc: Dan Cohen, Assistant General Counsel for Legislation, Regulation and Energy Efficiency, U.S. 

Department of Energy (Via e-mail to: Daniel.Cohen@hq.doe.gov)
Exhibit 32



Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)



The undersigned, as the President and Chief Executive Officer, and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Exide Technologies, each certify that



(1) the
accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) the information contained in the periodic report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Exide Technologies at the dates and for the periods indicated.



The foregoing certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350) and no purchaser or seller of
securities or any other person shall be entitled to rely upon the foregoing certification for any other purpose.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Exide Technologies and will be retained by Exide Technologies and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The undersigned expressly disclaims any obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.



Date: November 15, 2004



/s/    CRAIG H. MUHLHAUSERCraig H. Muhlhauser President and Chief Executive Officer/s/    J. TIMOTHY
GARGAROJ. Timothy Gargaro Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer