alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF SYSTEMAX INC.

DOMESTIC SUBSIDIARIES

| | 1. | Global Computer Supplies Inc. (a New York corporation)
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | Global Equipment Company Inc. (a New York corporation)
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------

| | 3. | Dartek Corporation (a Delaware corporation)
| | -- | -------------------------------------------

| | 4. | Nexel Industries Inc. (a New York corporation)
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------

| | 6. | Tiger Direct Inc. (a Florida corporation)
| | -- | -----------------------------------------

| | 7. | Systemax Manufacturing Inc. (a Delaware corporation)
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------

| | 8. | Profit Center Software Inc. ( a New York corporation)
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------

FOREIGN SUBSIDIARIES

| | 1. | Misco Germany Inc. (a New York corporation)
| | -- | -------------------------------------------

| | 2. | Misco Italy Computer Supplies S.P.A. (an Italian corporation)
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------

| | 3. | H C S Global SA (a French corporation)
| | -- | --------------------------------------

| | 4. | Systemax Europe Ltd. (a U.K. corporation)
| | -- | -----------------------------------------

| | 5. | Global Computer Products BV (a Dutch corporation)
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------

| | 6. | Dabus Dataproducktor AB (a Swedish corporation)
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------

| | 7. | Misco Iberia Computer Supplies S.A. (a Spanish corporation)
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Johnnie LEON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-6388.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 21, 2005.

Decided Oct. 18, 2005.

Johnnie Leon, Appellant Pro Se. John Staige Davis, V, Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Johnnie Leon appeals the district court’s final order denying his motion for return of property under Rule 41(g) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See United States v. Leon,*No. CR-01-92 (E.D.Va. Feb. 17, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be*266fore the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

)

RICARDO JOSE CALDERON

- LOPEZ

, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) No. 19

- cv

- 1851 (KBJ)

)

ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of

Social Security

, 1 )

)

)

Defendant. )

)

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION

OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby

ORDERED that Magistrate Judge G. Michael Harvey ’ s Report and

Recommendation (ECF No. 23) is A DOPTED in its entirety. It is

FURTHER OR DERED that Defendant ’ s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 20) is

GRANTED

.

DATE: May 25, 2021 

## Ketanji Brown Jackson

KETANJI BROWN JACKSON

United States District Judg e

1 Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Andrew M. Saul , who currently serves

as the Commissioner of Social Security , will be substituted for the prior Acting Commissioner

, Nancy

A. Berryhill.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 37 (Thursday, February 25, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8726-8727]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3787]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose

[[Page 8727]]

confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material, and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a 
clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel, Review of Applications on Case 
Ascertainment to Estimate the U.S. Prevalence of Fetal Alcohol 
Spectrum Disorders in Young Children (U01), RFA AA-10-005.
    Date: March 2, 2010.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: NIAAA, 5635 Fishers, Rockville, MD.
    Contact Person: Lorraine Gunzerath, PhD, MBA, Scientific Review 
Officer, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse And Alcoholism, Office 
Of Extramural Activities, Extramural Project Review Branch, 5635 
Fishers Lane, Room 2121, Bethesda, MD 20892-9304. 301-443-2369. 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#224e45574c58475043624f434b4e0c4c4b4a0c454d54"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2f43485a41554a5d4e6f424e46430141464701484059">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations imposed by 
the intramural research review cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants; 93.701, ARRA Related Biomedical 
Research and Research Support Awards., National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 18, 2010.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-3787 Filed 2-24-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > The Status of Women in the United States, 1953

              																	United States. Women's Bureau. 						*The Status of Women in the United States, 1953 : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 249*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1953,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5522,			accessed on September 6, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
ODP Information Bulletin 

No. 66 December 27, 2002 

TO: All State Administrative Agency Heads

 All State Administrative Agency Points of Contact

FROM: Andrew T. Mitchell

 Acting Director

SUBJECT: State and Local Approaches Bulletin

The Office for Domestic Preparedness (ODP) would like to announce two courses that the

Center for Domestic Preparedness (CDP) is now offering. 

The first course is the Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) Hands-On Training (HOT) Course. 

This course consists of a 2-day advanced training program providing hands-on training with

personal protective equipment (PPE), advanced sampling and monitoring equipment, evidence

collection and preservation, mass casualty triage, and explosive/ordnance secondary devices and 

searches. The course concludes with a multi-task, hands-on performance oriented training in the 

WMD [Toxic Agent] (COBRA) Training Facility. 

The second course is the WMD Hazardous Materials Technician Sustainment Training (HTS)

Course. This course consists of 2-days of scenario based advanced training in: personal

protective equipment (PPE) level A, advanced sampling and monitoring equipment, evidence

preservation, collection and overpack, and patient extrication and decontamination. The course 

concludes with a multi-task, hands-on performance oriented training in the WMD [Toxic Agent] 

(COBRA) Training Facility. 

Please feel free to contact your ODP state and local program manager if you have any questions.
§ 573.780 Polyethylene. ( a ) *Identity.* Polyethylene consists of basic polymers manufactured by the catalytic polymerization of ethylene.
( b ) *Specifications.* ( 1 ) For the purposes of this section, polyethylene shall meet the specifications in item 2.1 of § 177.1520(c) of this chapter.
( 2 ) The polyethylene is designed in a pellet form in a configuration presenting maximum angular surface having the following dimensions in centimeters: 0.9 ±0.1 × 0.8 ±0.1 × 1.2 ±0.1
( c ) *Use.* It is used as a replacement for roughage in feedlot rations for finishing slaughter cattle.
( d ) *Labeling.* The labels and labeling shall bear in addition to the other information required by the Act: ( 1 ) The name of the additive “polyethylene roughage replacement.”
( 2 ) Adequate directions for use which shall provide for the administration of one-half pound of polyethylene pellets per head per day for 6 successive days. All natural roughage should be removed for a minimum of 12 hours prior to administration of polyethylene roughage replacement. Roughage replacement must be adequately mixed in the ration for uniform distribution.
[41 FR 38652, Sept. 10, 1976, as amended at 54 FR 18282, Apr. 28, 1989]
NO. 296 -82354-2014

STATE OF TEXAS § IN THE DISTRICT COURT §

vs. § 296TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT §
COREY SMITH § COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS

NOTICE OF APPEAL

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:

Now comes Corey Smith, Defendant in the above styled and numbered cause, and gives

this written notice of appeal to the Court of Appeals of the State of Texas from the judgment of

conviction and sentence herein rendered against Corey Smith.

Respectfully submitted,

Law Office of Curtis Lilly 2201 Main, Suite 1220 Dallas, TX 75201 Tel: (214) 573-7660 Fax: (214) 573-7661

By: Curtis Lilly
State Bar No. 24030063 clilly@clillylaw.com Attorney for Corey Smith

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that on April 20, 2016, a true and correct copy of the above and

foregoing document was served on the District Attorney's Office, Collin County, by hand

delivery.

Curtis Lilly Filed: 4/20/2016 6:58:16 PM
Yoon Kim District Clerk Collin County, Texas By Christina Joseph Deputy Envelope ID: 10223970 Filed: 4/20/2016 6:58:16 PM
Yoon Kim District Clerk Collin County, Texas By Christina Joseph Deputy Envelope ID: 10223970
#### § 607.35 Blood product establishment registration number.

An establishment registration number will be assigned to each blood product establishment registered in accordance with this part.

[81 FR 60223, Aug. 31, 2016]
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1095 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 14, 2005 

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT 

To amend chapter 113 of title 18, United States Code, 

to clarify the prohibition on the trafficking in goods 

or services, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

S 1095 RFH 

1 SECTION 1. TRAFFICKING DEFINED. 

2 (a) COUNTERFEIT GOODS OR SERVICES.—Section 

3 2320(e) of title 18, United States Code, is amended— 

4 (1) by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the 

5 following: 

6 ‘‘(2) the term ‘traffic’ means to transport, 

7 transfer, or otherwise dispose of, to another, for pur8 poses of commercial advantage or private financial 

9 gain, or to make, import, export, obtain control of, 

10 or possess, with intent to so transport, transfer, or 

11 otherwise dispose of;’’; and 

12 (2) by redesignating paragraph (3) as para13 graph (4) and inserting the following: 

14 ‘‘(3) the term ‘financial gain’ includes the re15 ceipt, or expected receipt, of anything of value; 

16 and’’. 

17 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

18 (1) SOUND RECORDINGS AND MUSIC VIDEOS OF

19 LIVE MUSICAL PERFORMANCES.—Section 2319A(e) 

20 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by strik21 ing paragraph (2) and inserting the following: 

22 ‘‘(2) the term ‘traffic’ has the same meaning as 

23 in section 2320(e) of this title.’’. 

24 (2) COUNTERFEIT LABELS FOR

25 PHONORECORDS, COMPUTER PROGRAMS, ETC.—Sec26 tion 2318(b) of title 18, United States Code, is 
3 

S 1095 RFH 

1 amended by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the 

2 following: 

3 ‘‘(2) the term ‘traffic’ has the same meaning as 

4 in section 2320(e) of this title;’’. 

5 (3) ANTI-BOOTLEGGING.—Section 1101 of title 

6 17, United States Code, is amended by striking sub7 section (b) and inserting the following: 

8 ‘‘(b) DEFINITION.—As used in this section, the term 

9 ‘traffic’ has the same meaning as in section 2320(e) of 

10 title 18, United States Code.’’. 

Passed the Senate November 10, 2005. 

Attest: EMILY J. REYNOLDS, 

Secretary.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned officer ofSpescom Software, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies to his knowledge thatthe Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004(the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Thiscertification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not bedeemed to be a part of the Report or “filed” for any purpose whatsoever.

 
| Dated:                   | May 14, 2004 |   |   |
|--------------------------|--------------|--------|--------|
|                     |         |
| /s/ Carl  Mostert        |         |   |
| Carl Mostert             |         |
| Chief  Executive Officer |         |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Spescom SoftwareInc. and will be retained by Spescom Software, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
H. R. 7607 

One Hundred Eighteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-four 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at Block 1025, 

Lots 18 & 19, Northeast Corner of US Route 9 South and Main Street in the 

Township of Middle, County of Cape May, New Jersey, as the ‘‘George Henry 

White Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. GEORGE HENRY WHITE POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at Block 1025, Lots 18 & 19, Northeast Corner 

of US Route 9 South and Main Street in the Township of Middle, 

County of Cape May, New Jersey, shall be known and designated 

as the ‘‘George Henry White Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘George Henry White Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal No. 09-28]

# AGENCY:

Defense Security Cooperation Agency, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601-3740.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittals 09-28 with attached transmittal, and policy justification.

Dated: February 23, 2010.

Mitchell S. Bryman,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 9183)          ( print page 9184)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P

[FR Doc. 2010-4134 Filed 2-26-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
**Use Diagram**  

# [ CBI ]
# C_2014315EN.01004102.xml

| 15.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/41

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Brussel (Belgium) lodged on 7 July 2014 — SBS Belgium NV v Belgische Vereniging van Auteurs, Componisten en Uitgevers (SABAM)

(Case C-325/14)

2014/C 315/67

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hof van beroep te Brussel

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: SBS Belgium NV

Appellant:

Respondent: Belgische Vereniging van Auteurs, Componisten en Uitgevers (SABAM)

Respondent:

Question referred

Question referred

Does a broadcasting organisation which transmits its programmes exclusively via the technique of direct injection — that is to say, a two-step process in which it transmits its programme-carrying signals in an encrypted form via satellite, a fibre-optic connection or another means of transmission to distributors (satellite, cable or xDSL-line), without the signals being accessible to the public during or as a result of that transmission, and in which the distributors then send the signals to their subscribers so that the latter may view the programmes — make a communication to the public within the meaning of Article 3 of Directive 2001/29/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2001 L 167, p. 10.

1

---
#### STATE v. GEORGE HUGHES.1

November 9, 1923.

No. 23,540.

Motion for new trial too late.

Motion for new trial in criminal case should be made within 6 months after judgment — When made after that time denial is proper on ground that motion is too late. [Reporter.]

Defendant was indicted by the grand jury of Chisago county charged with the crime of bank robbery, tried in the district court for that county* before Searles, J., and a jury and found guilty as charged in the indictment. Prom an order denying his motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.

Appeal dismissed.

*Thomas V. Sullivan*and *Frank E. McAllister,*for appellant.

*Clifford L. Hilton,*Attorney General, *James E, Markham,*Deputy Attorney General, and *S. Bernhard Wennerberg,*for respondent.

1

 Reported in 195 N. W. 635.

*504PEE CURIAM.

Appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial, based upon a settled case and affidavits alleging newly discovered evidence. The defendant was convicted of the offense of bank robbery and sentenced to the state prison on October 29, 1921. On October 10, 1922, he moved the court for a new trial which was denied. This was over 11 months after sentence and judgment of conviction was entered. It should have been made within the six-month period allowed for appeal from the judgment. No excuse for its not having been made within that period was offered or could avail. A transcript of the testimony was unnecessary, as the assignments of error need not be specified in criminal actions. The motion for a new trial was properly denied on the ground that it was made too late. 2 Dunnell, Minn. Digest, §§ 7087, 7088; Kimball v. Palmerlee, 29 Minn. 302, 13 N. W. 129; Deering v. Johnson, 33 Minn. 97, 22 N. W. 174; State v. Johnson, 146 Minn. 468, 177 N. W. 657. The practice relating to new trials in criminal cases is the same as in civil. 1 Dunnell, Minn. Dig. § 2489.

Appeal dismissed.