alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9391-9392]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4297]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XU74


Caribbean Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of a public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Caribbean Fishery Management Council's Advisory Panel (AP) 
will hold a meeting.

DATES: The AP meeting will be held on March 24, 2010, from 9:30 a.m. 
until 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Buccaneer Hotel, 5007 Estate 
Shoys, Lot 7, Christiansted, n St. Croix, U.S.V.I.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Caribbean Fishery Management Council, 
268 Munoz Rivera Avenue, Suite 1108, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00918-1920, 
telephone: (787) 766-5926.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The AP will meet to discuss the items 
contained in the following agenda:
    - Call to order
    - SSC Meeting Report
    - Queen Conch Compatible Regulations
    - Trap Reduction Programs - USVI Meeting Report
    - ACLs Discussion
    - Other Business
    The meeting is open to the public, and will be conducted in 
English. However, simultaneous interpretation (from English to Spanish) 
will be provided. Fishers and other interested persons are invited to 
attend and participate with oral or written statements regarding agenda 
issues.
    Although non-emergency issues not contained in this agenda may come 
before this group for discussion, those

[[Page 9392]]

issues may not be the subject of formal action during this meeting. 
Action will be restricted to those issues specifically listed in this 
notice and any issues arising after publication of this notice that 
require emergency action under section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens 
Fishery Conservation and Management Act, provided the public has been 
notified of the Council's intent to take final action to address the 
emergency.

Special Accommodations

    This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
For more information or request for sign language interpretation and/
other auxiliary aids, please contact Mr. Miguel A. Rolon, Executive 
Director, Caribbean Fishery Management Council, 268 Munoz Rivera 
Avenue, Suite 1108, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00918-1920, telephone: (787) 
766-5926, at least 5 days prior to the meeting date.

    Dated: February 25, 2010.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-4297 Filed 3-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SHERIDAN HEALTHCARE, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  23,416
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,828
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               27,526
<PP&E>                                         6,488
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,950
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 87,035
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          13,876
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       69
<OTHER-SE>                                     41,281
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   87,035
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               98,616
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  68,919
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               15,109
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               4,066
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,461
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                8,061
<INCOME-TAX>                                   2,894
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            5,167
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   5,167
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.73



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 9438]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4248]



[[Page 9438]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-72,128]


Samsung Austin Semiconductor, LLC, DRAM Fab 1, a Subsidiary of 
Samsung Electronics Corporation, Including On-Site Leased Workers From 
Manpower and Amtech Systems, Inc., Austin, TX; Amended Certification 
Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(``Act''), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a 
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance 
on January 14, 2009, applicable to workers of Samsung Austin 
Semiconductor, LLC, a subsidiary of Samsung Electronics Corporation, 
DRAM Fab 1, including on-site leased workers from Manpower, Austin, 
Texas. The notice will be published in the Federal Register soon.
    At the request of the State Agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged 
in activities related to the production of DRAM chips for use in 
electronics.
    The company reports that on-site leased workers from Amtech 
Systems, Inc. were employed on-site at the Austin, Texas location of 
Samsung Austin Semiconductor, LLC, a subsidiary of Samsung Electronics 
Corporation, DRAM Fab 1. The Department has determined that these 
workers were sufficiently under the control of the subject firm to be 
considered leased workers.
    Based on these findings, the Department is amending this 
certification to include workers leased from Amtech Systems, Inc., 
working on-site at the Austin, Texas location of Samsung Austin 
Semiconductor, DRAM FAB 1.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-72,128 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Samsung Austin Semiconductor, DRAM Fab 1, a 
subsidiary of Samsung Electronics corporation, including on-site 
leased workers of Manpower and Amtech Systems, Inc., Austin, Texas, 
who became totally or partially separated from employment on or 
after August 26, 2008, through January 14, 2012, and all workers in 
the group threatened with total or partial separation from 
employment on the date of certification through two years from the 
date of certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment 
assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as 
amended.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 28th day of January, 2010.
 Michael W. Jaffe,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-4248 Filed 3-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      $1,244,380
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            $1,466,183
<PP&E>                                     $22,502,750
<DEPRECIATION>                              $7,554,474
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             $16,414,459
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         $292,504
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,394,027)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               $16,414,459
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              $924,276
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 $544,047
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               $39,365
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            $336,623
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               $  4,241
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            $ 4,241
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   $ 4,241
<EPS-BASIC>                                    $ .43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $ .43


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6088

ROGER SYNTELL LEGETTE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

ANTHONY PADULA, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District

Judge. (6:07-cv-00633-HMH)

Submitted: May 29, 2008 Decided: June 4, 2008

Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roger Syntell Legette, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel Creighton Waters,

Donald John Zelenka, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH

CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Roger Syntell Legette seeks to appeal the district

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge

and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition as untimely.

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Legette has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7224 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7224

    To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the Stop, 
   Observe, Ask, and Respond to Health and Wellness Training Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 5, 2024

 Mr. Cohen (for himself, Mrs. Wagner, Mr. Cardenas, and Mr. Carter of 
   Georgia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the Stop, 
   Observe, Ask, and Respond to Health and Wellness Training Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE SOAR TO HEALTH AND WELLNESS TRAINING 
              PROGRAM.

    Section 1254(h) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300d-
54(h)) is amended by striking ``fiscal years 2020 through 2024'' and 
inserting ``fiscal years 2025 through 2029''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 121.145 Food defense corrective actions. ( a ) *Food defense corrective action procedures.* As appropriate to the nature of the actionable process step and the nature of the mitigation strategy: ( 1 ) You must establish and implement written food defense corrective action procedures that must be taken if mitigation strategies are not properly implemented.
( 2 ) The food defense corrective action procedures must describe the steps to be taken to ensure that: ( i ) Appropriate action is taken to identify and correct a problem that has occurred with implementation of a mitigation strategy; and
( ii ) Appropriate action is taken, when necessary, to reduce the likelihood that the problem will recur.
( b ) *Records.* All food defense corrective actions taken in accordance with this section must be documented in records that are subject to food defense verification in accordance with § 121.150(a)(2) and records review in accordance with § 121.150(a)(3)(i).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>         6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>     DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>          JUN-30-1998

<CASH>                      68,282,988 
<SECURITIES>                      0    
<RECEIVABLES>               46,889,329 
<ALLOWANCES>                   993,010 
<INVENTORY>                166,230,267 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  0    
<PP&E>                      70,916,930 
<DEPRECIATION>              29,193,169 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>             334,416,340 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             0    
<BONDS>                           0    
<COMMON>                          0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>             0    
<PREFERRED>                       0    
<OTHER-SE>                 190,091,101 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>334,416,340 
<SALES>                    145,221,069 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>           145,221,069 
<CGS>                      112,209,667 
<TOTAL-COSTS>              112,209,667 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>             8,150,791 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                  0    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                0    
<INCOME-PRETAX>             24,860,611 
<INCOME-TAX>                      0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>         24,860,611 
<DISCONTINUED>                    0    
<EXTRAORDINARY>                   0    
<CHANGES>                         0    
<NET-INCOME>                24,860,611 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                    57.54 
<EPS-DILUTED>                    57.54 

        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 73
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 73 appear at 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001.

§ 73.3120 16,17-Dimethoxydinaphtho [1,2,3-cd:3′,2′,1′-lm] perylene-5,10-dione. ( a ) *Identity.* The color additive is 16,17-dimethoydinaphtho[1,2,3,-*cd:*3′,2′,1′-*lm*]perylene-5,10-dione (CAS Reg. No. 128-58-5), Colour Index No. 59825.
( b ) *Uses and restrictions.* ( 1 ) The substance listed in paragraph (a) of this section may be used as a color additive in contact lenses in amounts not to exceed the minimum reasonably required to accomplish the intended coloring effect.
( 2 ) Authorization for this use shall not be construed as waiving any of the requirements of sections 510(k), 515, and 520(g) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act with respect to the contact lens in which the color additive is used.
( c ) *Labeling.* The label of the color additive shall conform to the requirements of § 70.25 of this chapter.
( d ) *Exemption from certification.* Certification of this color additive is not necessary for the protection of the public health, and therefore the color additive is exempt from the certification requirements of section 721(c) of the act.
[48 FR 31376, July 8, 1983]
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

954 KA 15-01108 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, DEJOSEPH, AND SCUDDER, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MARTIN SMALLWOOD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

JAMES S. KERNAN, PUBLIC DEFENDER, LYONS (ROBERT TUCKER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

RICHARD M. HEALY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LYONS (BRUCE A. ROSEKRANS OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Wayne County Court (Daniel G. Barrett, J.), rendered March 26, 2015. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (three counts).

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of three counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.39 [1]). County Court imposed on defendant a determinate term of imprisonment of two years in accordance with section 70.70 because the crime herein constituted defendant’s second felony drug offense, with the term of imprisonment to be followed by 11⁄2 years of postrelease supervision. The court also directed the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision to enroll defendant in the shock incarceration program ( see § 60.04 [7] [a]). Defendant was removed from the shock incarceration program prior to completion, finished the remainder of his determinate sentence in prison, and was subsequently released to parole supervision.

Inasmuch as defendant has completed his term of incarceration and is currently on parole, his contention that he was entitled to placement in an “alternative-to-shock-incarceration program” during incarceration is moot (Penal Law § 60.04 [7] [b] [i]; see generally People ex rel. Dickerson v Unger , 62 AD3d 1262, 1263, lv denied 12 NY3d 716), and none of the issues raised by defendant fall within the exception to the mootness doctrine ( see generally Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne , 50 NY2d 707, 714-715).

Contrary to the further contention of defendant, we conclude that-2- 954 KA 15-01108
the sentence is not unduly harsh and severe. However, we note that the certificate of conviction and the uniform sentence and commitment form should be amended because they incorrectly reflect that defendant was sentenced as a second felony offender when he was actually sentenced as a second felony drug offender ( see People v Oberdorf , 136 AD3d 1291, 1292-1293, lv denied 27 NY3d 1073).

Entered: December 23, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
###### Editorial Note on Part 201

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 201 appear at 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004.

#### § 201.128 Meaning of “intended uses”.

The words *intended uses* or words of similar import in §§ 201.5, 201.115, 201.117, 201.119, 201.120, 201.122, and 1100.5 of this chapter refer to the objective intent of the persons legally responsible for the labeling of an article (or their representatives). The intent may be shown by such persons' expressions, the design or composition of the article, or by the circumstances surrounding the distribution of the article. This objective intent may, for example, be shown by labeling claims, advertising matter, or oral or written statements by such persons or their representatives. Objective intent may be shown, for example, by circumstances in which the article is, with the knowledge of such persons or their representatives, offered or used for a purpose for which it is neither labeled nor advertised; provided, however, that a firm would not be regarded as intending an unapproved new use for an approved drug based solely on that firm's knowledge that such drug was being prescribed or used by health care providers for such use. The intended uses of an article may change after it has been introduced into interstate commerce by its manufacturer. If, for example, a packer, distributor, or seller intends an article for different uses than those intended by the person from whom he or she received the article, such packer, distributor, or seller is required to supply adequate labeling in accordance with the new intended uses.

[86 FR 41401, Aug. 2, 2021]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A)
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE QUARTER
ENDED MARCH 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B)
FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 30, 1997.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-30-1997
<CASH>                                          17,240
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,055
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      4,383
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,979
<PP&E>                                         254,055
<DEPRECIATION>                                  60,932
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 286,913
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          119,919
<BONDS>                                        164,889
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,712)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   286,913
<SALES>                                        114,978
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               114,978
<CGS>                                           30,365
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  118,497
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,406
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,925)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       176
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,101)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,101)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>