Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 39 / Monday, March 1, 2010 / Notices 9159 

Office of Sustainable Fisheries, NMFS, 

1315 East-West Highway, Room 13362, 

Silver Spring, MD 20910. Mark the 

outside of the envelope ‘‘Comments on 

Coastal Shark Non-Compliance.’’ 

Comments may also be sent via fax to 

(301) 713–0596. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Brian Hooker, Fishery Management 

Specialist, NMFS Office of Sustainable 

Fisheries, (301) 713–2334. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Coastal Shark ISFMP includes 

management measures for several 

species of Atlantic sharks. The 

implementation of these regulations is 

necessary to rebuild depleted shark 

stocks, ensure sustainable harvest of 

others, and provide protection for 

sharks in state nursing and pupping 

grounds. The Commission’s Technical 

Committee has identified Delaware Bay 

as one of the most important nursing 

grounds for depleted sandbar sharks on 

the Atlantic Coast. Included in the 22 

commercial and recreational regulations 

in the FMP is a seasonal closure from 

Virginia north through New Jersey to 

protect pupping sandbar sharks. On 

February 4, 2010, the Commission 

found the State of New Jersey out of 

compliance for not fully and effectively 

implementing and enforcing the Coastal 

Shark ISFMP. The Commission 

subsequently referred its noncompliance finding to NMFS. 

Federal response to a Commission 

non-compliance referral is governed by 

the Atlantic Coastal Act. Under the 

Atlantic Coastal Act, the Secretary of 

Commerce (Secretary) must make two 

findings within 30 days after receiving 

the non-compliance referral. First, the 

Secretary must determine whether the 

state in question (in this case, New 

Jersey) has failed to carry out its 

responsibilities under the ISFMP. 

Second, the Secretary must determine 

whether the measures that the State has 

failed to implement or enforce are 

necessary for the conservation of the 

fishery in question. If the Secretary of 

Commerce makes affirmative findings 

on both criteria, then the Secretary must 

implement a moratorium on fishing in 

the fishery in question (in this case 

coastal sharks) within the waters of the 

non-complying state (in this case, New 

Jersey). Further, the moratorium must 

become effective within six months of 

the date of the Secretary’s noncompliance determination. To the 

extent that the allegedly offending state 

later implements the involved measure, 

the Atlantic Coastal Act allows the state 

to petition the Commission that it has 

come back into compliance, and if the 

Commission concurs, the Commission 

will notify the Secretary and, if the 

Secretary concurs, the moratorium will 

be withdrawn. The Secretary has 

delegated Atlantic Coastal Act 

authorities to the Assistant 

Administrator for Fisheries at NMFS. 

NMFS has notified the State of New 

Jersey, the Commission, the MidAtlantic Fishery Management Council, 

and the New England Fishery 

Management Council, in separate 

letters, of its receipt of the 

Commission’s non-compliance referral. 

In the letters, NMFS solicits comments 

from the Commission and Councils to 

the extent either entity is interested in 

providing such comments. NMFS also 

indicates to the State of New Jersey that 

the State is entitled to meet with and 

present its comments directly to NMFS 

if the State so desires. 

NMFS intends to make its noncompliance determination on or about 

March 10, 2010, which is 30 days after 

receipt of the Commission’s noncompliance referral. NMFS will 

announce its determination by Federal 

Register notice immediately thereafter. 

To the extent that NMFS makes an 

affirmative non-compliance finding, 

NMFS will announce the effective date 

of the moratorium in that Federal 

Register notice. 

Authority: 16 U.S.C. 5101 et seq. 

Dated: February 24, 2010. 

James P. Burgess, 

Acting Director, Office of Sustainable 

Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service. 

[FR Doc. 2010–4185 Filed 2–26–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–22–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–822] 

Certain Helical Spring Lock Washers 

from the People’s Republic of China: 

Extension of Time Limit for the Final 

Results of the 2007–2008 Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: March 1, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Brandon Farlander or David Layton, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office 1, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone (202) 482–0182 and (202) 

482–0371, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On November 9, 2009, the Department 

of Commerce (‘‘Department’’) published 

the preliminary results of the 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on certain 

helical spring lock washers (‘‘lock 

washers’’) from the People’s Republic of 

China, covering the period October 1, 

2007 through September 30, 2008. See 

Certain Helical Spring Lock Washers 

from the People’s Republic of China: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review, 74 FR 

57653 (November 9, 2009). The final 

results of this administrative review 

were originally due no later than March 

9, 2010. As explained in the 

memorandum from the Deputy 

Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration, the Department has 

exercised its discretion to toll deadlines 

for the duration of the closure of the 

Federal Government from February 5, 

through February 12, 2010. Thus, all 

deadlines in this segment of the 

proceeding have been extended by 

seven days. The revised deadline for the 

final results of this review is currently 

March 16, 2010. See Memorandum to 

the Record from Ronald Lorentzen, DAS 

for Import Administration, regarding 

‘‘Tolling of Administrative Deadlines As 

a Result of the Government Closure 

During the Recent Snowstorm,’’ dated 

February 12, 2010. 

Extension of Time Limit for Final 

Results 

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (‘‘Act’’), requires 

that the Department issue the final 

results of an administrative review 

within 120 days after the date on which 

the preliminary results are published. If 

it is not practicable to complete the 

review within that time period, section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the 

Department to extend the deadline for 

the final results to a maximum of 180 

days after the date on which the 

preliminary results are published. 

In the instant review, the Department 

requires additional time to address the 

issues raised by interested parties 

regarding surrogate values for factors of 

production and to analyze additional 

surrogate value information filed by 

both the petitioner and respondent. In 

their case briefs and rebuttal briefs both 

parties have raised concerns about the 

selection of a surrogate value for steel 

wire rod, the key input for the 

production of lock washers. In addition, 

parties have presented arguments 

backed up by the timely filed surrogate 

value information regarding the 

selection of surrogate values for 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

9160 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 39 / Monday, March 1, 2010 / Notices 

1May 15, 2010 is the actual 60-day extended 

deadline. As May 15 is a Saturday, the new final 

results deadline will be May 17, 2010, the first 

business day after that weekend. 

chemical inputs and financial ratios that 

the Department needs additional time to 

consider. Thus, it is not practicable to 

complete this review by March 16, 2010, 

and the Department is, therefore, 

extending the time limit for completion 

of the final results by an additional 60 

days, as permitted by section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. The final results 

are now due no later than May 17, 

2010.1

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(3)(A) and 777(i) of the Act. 

Dated: February 22, 2010. 

John M. Andersen, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2010–4169 Filed 2–26–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–898] 

Chlorinated Isocyanurates From the 

People’s Republic of China: Notice of 

Extension of Time Limit for the 

Preliminary Results of the 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: March 1, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Brandon Petelin or Charles Riggle, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office 8, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–8173 or (202) 482– 

0650, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 29, 2009, the Department of 

Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) published 

the initiation of the administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on chlorinated isocyanurates from the 

People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). See 

Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews and Deferral of Administrative 

Review, 74 FR 37690 (July 29, 2009). 

This review covers the period June 1, 

2008, through May 31, 2009. The 

preliminary results of the review were 

due no later than March 2, 2010. As 

explained in the memorandum from the 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration, the Department has 

exercised its discretion to toll deadlines 

for the duration of the closure of the 

Federal Government from February 5, 

through February 12, 2010. Thus, all 

deadlines in this segment of the 

proceeding have been extended by 

seven days. The revised deadline for the 

preliminary results of this review is now 

March 9, 2010. See Memorandum to the 

Record from Ronald Lorentzen, DAS for 

Import Administration, regarding 

‘‘Tolling of Administrative Deadlines as 

a Result of the Government Closure 

During the Recent Snowstorm,’’ dated 

February 12, 2010. 

Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary 

Results of Review 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the 

Act’’), the Department shall make a 

preliminary determination in an 

administrative review of an 

antidumping duty order within 245 

days after the last day of the anniversary 

month of the date of publication of the 

order. The Act further provides, 

however, that the Department may 

extend that 245-day period to 365 days 

if it determines it is not practicable to 

complete the review within the 

foregoing time period. 

The Department finds that it is not 

practicable to complete the preliminary 

results of the administrative review of 

chlorinated isocyanurates from the PRC 

within this time limit. Specifically, due 

to complex issues, e.g., factors of 

production and surrogate value 

selections, we find that additional time 

is needed to complete these preliminary 

results. Therefore, in accordance with 

section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, the 

Department is extending the time period 

for completion of the preliminary 

results of this review by 60 days from 

March 9, 2010, until May 8, 2010. 

However, because May 8, 2010, falls on 

a weekend, the actual due date will be 

the first business day following the 

weekend, i.e., May 10, 2010. 

This notice is published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(3)(A) 

and 777(i) of the Act. 

Dated: February 23, 2010. 

John M. Andersen, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2010–4174 Filed 2–26–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 

751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (‘‘the Act’’), the Department of 

Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) is 

automatically initiating a five-year 

review (‘‘Sunset Review’’) of the 

antidumping duty orders listed below. 

The International Trade Commission 

(‘‘the Commission’’) is publishing 

concurrently with this notice its notice 

of Institution of Five-Year Review which 

covers the same orders. 

DATES: Effective Date: March 1, 2010 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The 

Department official identified in the 

Initiation of Review section below at 

AD/CVD Operations, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230. 

For information from the Commission 

contact Mary Messer, Office of 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, at (202) 205–3193. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The Department’s procedures for the 

conduct of Sunset Reviews are set forth 

in its Procedures for Conducting FiveYear (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews of Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Orders, 63 FR 

13516 (March 20, 1998) and 70 FR 

62061 (October 28, 2005). Guidance on 

methodological or analytical issues 

relevant to the Department’s conduct of 

Sunset Reviews is set forth in the 

Department’s Policy Bulletin 98.3— 

Policies Regarding the Conduct of FiveYear (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews of Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Orders: Policy 

Bulletin, 63 FR 18871 (April 16, 1998). 

Initiation of Review 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.218(c), we are initiating the sunset 

reviews of the following antidumping 

duty orders: 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES