### CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD


### SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST

*** 

### TO BE COMPLETED BY DISTRICT AND RETURNEDTO ARB

~
All rules submitted to the EPA as State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions must be supported by certain information 

### and documentation forthe rule packages to be deemed complete for review by the EPA. Rules will not be evaluated for approvability by the EPA unless the submittal packages 

### are complete. To assist you in determining that all necessary materials 

### are mcluded in rules packages sent the ARB for submittal to the EPA, please fill outthe following form 

### and mclude at with the rule package you send ARB. See the ARB’s Guidelines on the Implementation ofthe EPA’s Draft 

### SIP Completeness Policy, October 1989, fora more detailed explanation than is provided here.
District: South Coast

### AirQualityManagement District Rule No. 2202 DateAmended: October9, 1998 Rule Title: On-Road MotorVehicle Mitigation Options

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS Not 

### Attached Attached N/A (X) 

## () ?T COMPLETE COPYOFTHE RULE: Provide an unmarked copy ofthe entire rule as adopted oramended byyour District Board. 

### (X) 

## () () UNDERLINE 

### AND STRiKEOUT COPY OF TIlE RULE: If an amended rule, provide a complete copy of the 

### rule indicating in underline and strikeout format all language which has been added, deleted, orchanged sincethe rulewas lastadopted oramended. 

### (X) 

## () () COMPLETE COPYOF THE 

### REFERENCED RULE(S): Foranyrule which includes language specifically referencing another rule, a copy of that other 

### rule must also be submitted, unless it has already been submittedto EPAas 

### part ofaprevious 

### SIP submittal. (X) 

## () () PUBLIC NOTICE EVIDENCE: Include a copy ofthe local newspaper clipping certification(s), statingthe date ofpublication, which must be at least30 days beforethe hearing. As an alternative, include acopy ofthe actual published notice ofthe public hearing as it appeared in the local newspaper(s). In this case, however, enough ofthe newspaper page must be mcluded to showthe date ofpublication. the notice must specifically identify bytitle and numbereach rule adopted oramended. 

### (X) 

## () () RESOLUTION/MINUTE ORDER: Provide the Board Clerk certified resolution or minute order. This document must include certification that the hearing was held in accordance with the information in the public notice. It must also list the rules that were adopted or amended, the date of the public hearing, and a statement of compliance with California Health and Safety Code Sections 40725-40728 (Administrative ProceduresAct). (X) 

## () () PUBLIC COMMENTS AND RESPONSES: Submit copies ofwritten public comments made during the notice period and at the public hearing. Also submitanywritten responsesprepared bythe District staff or presented to the District Board at the public hearing. A summary of the public comments 

### and responses is adequate. If there were no comments made during the notice period or at the hearing, please indicate N/Atothe left.

## TECHNICAL MATERIALS

Not Attached Attached N/A (X) 

## () 

## ~T RULE EVALUATION FORM: See instructions for completing the Rule Evaluation Form andthe accompanying sample form. 

## C) () (X) NON-EPATEST METHOD: Include all test methods referenced in the rule, butnotpreviouslysubmitted to EPA. Provide an explanation ofthe purpose and principle for the test method and include the following supportmgtechnical data: describethe testdetails (numberofteststo be carned out, their precision accuracy, and repeatability); on a technical basis, compare the method with the appropriate EPAJASTM method; explain thetechnical differences ofthe two methods and howtheyaffect monitormg ofthe parameters of interest; explain how the test method affects the implementation and enforcement of the applicable rule; explain the advantages and any potential shortcomings of the test method. 

## () (X) MODELING SUPPORT: Provide if appropriate; in general modeling support is not required for VOC and NOx rules to determine their impacts on ozone levels. Modeling is rçquired where a rule is a relaxation that affects large sources 

## (~ 100 TPY) in an attainment area for S02, directly emitted PM1O, CO, or NOx (for N02 purposes). In cases where EPA is concerned with the impact on air quality of rule revisions which relax limits or cause a shift in emission patterns in a nonãttainment area, a reference back to the approved SIP will be sufficient provided the approved SIP used the current EPA modeling guidelines. Ifcurrent EPA modeling guidelines were not used, then new modeling maybe required. 

## () (X) ECONOMIC AND TECHNICAL JUSTIFICATION FOR I ‘ I ‘ I ~ •A

• I I : s appropriate, escri e special circumstances, i.e., where alternative RACY is used, extended compliance date are included, etc. A completed SIP Approvability Checklist-Enforceabilitywill fulfill this requirement. (X) 

## () () ADDITIONAL MATERIALS: Provide any other supporting information concerning developmentofthe rule or rule changes, such as staffreports.

(ARBFORM

- 6/93)