alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>   This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
           from the Balance Sheet and Statement of Operations included in
           the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 and
           is qualified in its entirety by reference to such Financial
           Statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                    <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                         Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                           Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          12-MOS
<CASH>                                   43,251
<SECURITIES>                              6,519
<RECEIVABLES>                                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         53,901
<PP&E>                                    6,283
<DEPRECIATION>                            3,679
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           57,139
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    11,132
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                     19
<OTHER-SE>                               27,994
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             57,139
<SALES>                                  10,494
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         10,494
<CGS>                                     9,945
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             9,945
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         28,335
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (27,344)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (27,344)
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                            (27,344)
<EPS-BASIC>                            ($1.88)
<EPS-DILUTED>                            ($1.88)


</TABLE>
---

---

Exhibit 13

Certification Pursuant to Rule
13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Ellomay Capital Ltd. (the
Company) for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned officers
of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|A) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|B) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | /s/ Ran Fridrich
Ran FridrichInterim Chief Executive Officer
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | /s/ Kalia Weintraub
Kalia WeintraubChief Financial Officer
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 31, 2009



---

---
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-19-00004-CV 

ACRS 2000 CORP., APPELLANT 

 

V. 

 

PRIDE NETWORK, INC., D/B/A NTS COMMUNICATIONS, AND 

NTS COMMUNICATIONS, INC., APPELLEES 

 

On Appeal from the 237th District Court 

Lubbock County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 2016-520,098, Honorable Les Hatch, Presiding 

 

April 29, 2019 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ. 

Appellant, ACRS 2000 Corp., has filed an unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss

its appeal.1 Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion pursuant to 

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1) and dismiss the appeal. Having dismissed 

 

1 We previously severed and dismissed the appeal of Pride Network, Inc. d/b/a NTS 

Communications and NTS Communications, Inc. See Pride Network, Inc. v. ACRS 2000 Corp., Nos. 07-

19-00004-CV & 07-19-00144-CV, 2019 Tex. App. LEXIS 3261, at *1 (Tex. App.—Amarillo Apr. 23, 2019, 

order) (per curiam).
2

the appeal at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our 

mandate will issue forthwith.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Wayside Technology Group, Inc (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kevin T. Scull, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of   Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                     |
| (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,   in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations   of the Company. |

| /s/  Kevin T.   Scull                  |   |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                             |   |
| Kevin T. Scull                              |   |
| Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer |   |
| March 12, 2007                              |   |

*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 5.1

September 10, 1998

SI Technologies, Inc.
4611 S. 134th Place
Seattle, WA 98168

RE:    FORM S-3 REGISTRATION STATEMENT

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We have acted as counsel to SI Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") in connection
with the preparation of its Registration Statement on Form S-3, No. 333-60421
(the "Registration Statement") under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
"Act"), which the Company has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
with respect to an aggregate of 1,087,632 shares of Common Stock of the Company
consisting of 839,664 shares of outstanding Common Stock (the "Shares") and
247,968 shares of Common Stock to be issued upon execution of Warrants issued
April 17, 1998 (the "Warrant Shares").

We have examined the Registration Statement and such other documents and records
as we have deemed relevant and necessary for the purpose of this opinion.

Based upon and subject to the foregoing, we are of the opinion that (i) the
Shares are validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable, and (ii) that the
Warrant Shares will, upon due execution by the Company and the registration by
its registrar of the certificates for the Shares and issuance thereof by the
Company and receipt by the Company of the consideration therefor in accordance
with the terms of the Warrants, be validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable.

We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement. In giving such consent, we do not admit that we are in
the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Act.

Very truly yours,



Benjamin F. Stephens
         of
GRAHAM & JAMES LLP/RIDDELL WILLIAMS P.S.

BFS/dp
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 3, 2010 

0526 

Order 

 

June 3, 2010 

140405 

GERALD W. PANO, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 140405 

 COA: 294321 

WCAC: 09-000054 

GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 15, 2009 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                           LOGAN'S ROADHOUSE, INC.

Computation of Net Earnings Per Share (Pro Forma Data for 1995 and 1994)
                  (in thousands, except for per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                FISCAL YEAR ENDED
                                                   --------------------------------------------
                                                   DECEMBER 25,    DECEMBER 31,    DECEMBER 29,
                                                       1994            1995           1996
                                                      -----           -----          ------
<S>                                                   <C>             <C>            <C>
Average shares outstanding(1)(2)                       3,068           3,776          5,652
Common stock equivalents - stock options(2)               -               58            174
                                                      ------          ------         ------
Weighted average number of shares outstanding(2)       3,068           3,834          5,826
                                                      ======          ======         ======
Net earnings (pro forma data for 1994 and 1995)(2)    $1,043          $1,905         $4,149
                                                      ======          ======         ======
Net earnings per share (pro forma data for 1994 and
  1995)(2)                                            $ 0.34          $ 0.50         $ 0.71
                                                      ======          ======         ======
</TABLE>

(1)  The shares outstanding for 1994 and through July 25, 1995 represent the
     number of shares received by the partners of Logan's Partnership pursuant
     to an exchange agreement.

(2)  Restated to reflect the three-for-two stock split effected in June 1996.
Editorial Note on Part 184
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 184 appear at 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; and 81 FR 49897, July 29, 2016.

§ 184.1983 Bakers yeast extract. ( a ) Bakers yeast extract is the food ingredient resulting from concentration of the solubles of mechanically ruptured cells of a selected strain of yeast, *Saccharomyces cerevisiae.* It may be concentrated or dried.
( b ) The ingredient meets the following specifications on a dry weight basis: Less than 0.4 part per million (ppm) arsenic, 0.13 ppm cadmium, 0.2 ppm lead, 0.05 ppm mercury, 0.09 ppm selenium, and 10 ppm zinc.
( c ) The viable microbial content of the finished ingredient as a concentrate or dry material is: ( 1 ) Less than 10,000 organisms/gram by aerobic plate count.
( 2 ) Less than 10 yeasts and molds/gram.
( 3 ) Negative for *Salmonella, E. coli,* coagulase positive *Staphylococci, Clostridium perfringens, Clostridium botulinum,* or any other recognized microbial pathogen or any harmful microbial toxin.
( d ) The ingredient is used as a flavoring agent and adjuvant as defined in § 170.3(o)(12) of this chapter at a level not to exceed 5 percent in food.
( e ) This regulation is issued prior to general evaluation of use of this ingredient in order to affirm as GRAS the specific use named.
§ 182.3862 Sulfur dioxide. ( a ) *Product.* Sulfur dioxide.
( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) *Limitations, restrictions, or explanation.* This substance is generally recognized as safe when used in accordance with good manufacturing practice, except that it is not used in meats; in food recognized as a source of vitamin B1; on fruits or vegetables intended to be served raw to consumers or sold raw to consumers, or to be presented to consumers as fresh.
[42 FR 14640, Mar. 15, 1977, as amended at 51 FR 25026, July 9, 1986; 55 FR 9833, Mar. 15, 1990; 59 FR 65939, Dec. 22, 1994]
§ 520.581 Dichlorophene tablets. ( a ) *Specifications.* Each tablet contains 1 gram of dichlorophene.
( b ) *Sponsor.* See 023851 in § 510.600(c) of this chapter.
( c ) *Required statement.* Consult your veterinarian for assistance in the diagnosis, treatment, and control of parasitism, and before administering to weak or debilitated animals.
( d ) *Conditions of use. Dogs* — ( 1 ) *Amount.* Single dose of 1 tablet (1 gram of dichlorophene) for each 10 pounds of body weight.
( 2 ) *Indications for use.* It is used as an aid in the removal of tapeworms (*Taenia pisiformis* and *Dipylidium caninum*).
( 3 ) *Limitations.* Withhold solid foods and milk for at least 12 hours prior to medication and for 4 hours afterward.
[45 FR 10333, Feb. 15, 1980]
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Materials Prepared in Connection with the Study of Employment, Growth, and Price Levels for Consideration by the Joint Economic Committee, Congress of the United States

              																								United States. Congress. Joint Economic Committee, 1956-					 and 	Eighty-Sixth Congress, 1959-1961.						"Study Paper No. 1: Recent Inflation in the United States" in *Materials Prepared in Connection with the Study of Employment, Growth, and Price Levels for Consideration by the Joint Economic Committee, Congress of the United States*			(September 1959).						https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/1244/item/3642, accessed on September 26, 2024.	    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
#### Morales *v.*Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States.

[No. 17,267.

Filed May 1, 1945.]

*566*Emmet LaRue,*of Rensselaer, and *Stiles & Bayor,*of Gary, for appellant.

*L. L. Bomberger, Carl L. Christopher son,*and *Bomberger, Morthland & Royce,*all of Hammond, for appellee.

Flanagan, J.

— This action was brought by appellant against appellee on a group insurance policy issued by appellee.

At the close of appellant’s evidence the trial court directed a verdict for appellee and the correctness of this action is the sole question here presented.

Appellant is the widow of Juan Morales who died May 3, 1938. For some time prior to his death Juan Morales was employed by Inland Steel Company and was insured under a group insurance policy taken by his employer with appellee. On about February 17, 1938, he was temporarily laid off and was not called back to work prior to his death. From his last pay check insurance was deducted which paid his premiums through February but no premiums were collected or paid for the months of March, April or May. The involved policy contains the following provision:

> “The insurance under this policy upon the life of any employee shall automatically cease upon his

> *567discontinuance of participation as evidenced in writing signed by him and filed with the society, or upon termination of his employment with the employer in the classes of employees insured hereunder without regard to the cause of such termination except that the employer may elect that all employees who while insured hereunder are temporarily laid off or given leave of absence or are disabled or retired on pension, shall be considered to be in the employment of the employer during such period . . .

The master policy was in the hands of Inland Steel Company. It was the agent of its employees in the negotiations that resulted in the issuance of the policy and in deducting premiums from their pay and remitting them to the insurance company. *Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.*v. *Henry*(1940), 217 Ind. 33, 24 N. E. (2d) 918. Appellant’s decedent was therefore charged with knowledge of the provisions of the policy.

The provision above set forth is clear and unambiguous. No employees are covered during temporary layoffs unless the employer elects that all employees temporarily laid off shall be covered. Certainly this election must be by affirmative action communicated to the insurance company. There is no evidence of any such action and the trial court therefore correctly directed a verdict for appellee.

The case of *John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co.*v. *Pappageorgu*(1940), 107 Ind. App. 327, 24 N. E. (2d) 428, cited and relied upon by appellant, involves a very different contract and is not in point here.

It is not necessary for us to determine the effect of the non-payment of premiums during the months of March, April and May, 1938.

Judgment affirmed.

NOTE. — Reported in 60 N. E. (2d) 747.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7518 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7518

   To accommodate certain facilities within the right-of-way on any 
                          Federal-aid highway.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 1, 2024

   Ms. Porter (for herself, Ms. Williams of Georgia, Ms. Norton, Mr. 
   Huffman, Mr. Menendez, and Mr. Johnson of Georgia) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 
                           and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To accommodate certain facilities within the right-of-way on any 
                          Federal-aid highway.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Solar Use Network Act'' or the ``SUN 
Act''.

SEC. 2. ACCOMMODATION OF CERTAIN FACILITIES IN RIGHT-OF-WAY.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding chapter 1 of title 23, United 
States Code, electric vehicle charging infrastructure, renewable energy 
generation facilities, electrical transmission and distribution 
infrastructure, and broadband infrastructure and conduit shall be 
treated as a facility covered under part 645 of title 23, Code of 
Federal Regulations (or successor regulations), for purposes of being 
accommodated under section 109(l) of title 23, United States Code.
    (b) State Approval.--A State, on behalf of the Secretary of 
Transportation, may approve the accommodation of the infrastructure and 
facilities described in subsection (a) within any right-of-way on a 
Federal-aid highway pursuant to section 109(l) of title 23, United 
States Code.
                                 <all>
```
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statements on
Forms S-8 (Nos.  333-52651,  333-4502,  33-98384 and 33-98386) pertaining to the
1995 Director Stock Option Plan, Amended and Restated 1993 Stock Option Plan and
1995  Employee  Stock  Purchase  Plan of  PixTech,  Inc.  and on Form  S-3  (No.
333-52789)  of  our  report  dated  February  3,  1999,   with  respect  to  the
consolidated financial statements of PixTech, Inc. included in the Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1998.


                                           /s/ Ernst & Young AUDIT

                                           Ernst & Young AUDIT
                                           Represented By: CHRISTINE BLANC-PATIN


Marseilles, France
March 9, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-03-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-01-2000
<CASH>                                          58,615
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  500,743
<ALLOWANCES>                                    48,372
<INVENTORY>                                    505,931
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,074,045
<PP&E>                                       1,017,291
<DEPRECIATION>                                 323,155
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,411,761
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          816,987
<BONDS>                                      1,325,715
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           263
<OTHER-SE>                                    (70,930)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,411,761
<SALES>                                        494,174
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               494,174
<CGS>                                          358,771
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  358,771
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,741
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,870
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (20,998)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (6,811)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (14,534)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (14,534)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.68)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.68)


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

FRANK PICCOLO, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 534 EAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 1st day of December, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is DENIED.