alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

STATE OF DELAWARE

v.

DERRIS LLOYD

 Defendant.

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

)

)

)

)

I.D. NO.: 0808010637A/B

ORDER

On this 30th day of September, 2024, upon consideration of Defendant 

Derris Lloyd’s (“Defendant”) pro se Motion for Sentence Modification (the 

“Motion”), the sentence imposed upon the Defendant, and the record in this case, 

it appears to the Court that:

1. On October 6, 2022, Defendant was sentenced for violating the terms

of his probation to three years level at Level V, followed by six months at Level 

IV Department of Correction discretion, followed by two years at Level III GPS 

monitoring.

1

1 D.I. 55 (Sentence Order).
2. On June 22, 2024, Defendant filed this Motion pursuant to Delaware 

Superior Court Criminal Rule 35(b) (“Rule 35(b)”).

2 In the Motion, Defendant 

asks the Court to modify the Level IV portion of his sentence to Level III GPS 

monitoring to run concurrently with his existing two years of Level III GPS 

monitoring.3

3. When considering a motion made pursuant to Rule 35(b), the Court will 

first address any procedural bars.4 Defendant’s motion made pursuant to Rule 

35(b) is not subject to the 90-day bar imposed by Rule 35(b).5 However, Rule 

35(b) mandates that the Court will not consider repetitive requests for sentence 

reduction.6 A Rule 35(b) motion is considered repetitive even if the later motion 

raises new arguments.7

4. This is Defendant’s second Rule 35(b) motion in this case.8 On January 

11, 2023, Defendant filed a previous motion to modify his sentence.9 The Court 

2 D.I. 58. (the Motion).

3 Id.

4 State v. Redden, 111 A.3d 602, 606 (Del. Super. 2015). 

5 Benge v. State, 101 A.3d 973, 976 (Del. 2014); Super. Crim. Ct. R. 35(b) (“The court may. . . 

reduce the fine or term of condition of partial confinement or probation at any time.”).

6 Super. Ct. Crim. R. 35(b).

7 State v. Culp, 152 A.3d 141, 144 (Del. 2016). 

8 D.I. 56 (Def’s first Rule 35(b) motion). 9 Id.
denied that motion on April 14, 2023.10 Thus, under Rule 35(b), Defendant’s 

motion is repetitive and cannot be considered by the Court.

5. Accordingly, Defendant’s Motion is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Sheldon K. Rennie, Judge

Original to Prothonotary

cc: Derris Lloyd (SBI# 00292256)

10 D.I. 57 (Order denying Def’s first Rule 35(b) motion).
Dec~sion Memorandum Mint Oil 

5/1/2008 

Based on decisions by Janet Andersen, Director, Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention 

Division, Office ofPesticide Programs. (12/22/2003 and 4/07/2008) 

Minimal Risk list in 40CFR 152.25(f), aka the 25b list- Oils included under the term, 

"Mint and Mint Oil": 

.>"iint oil, CAS# 68917-18-0, derived from the "wild mint" plant, Mentha arvensis, and 

\.§pearmint Oil, CAS # 8008-79-g erived from the plant Mentha spicata: Synonym.-

Mentha viridis L 

The term "Mint Oil" was not intended to include all oils from the mint plant genus 

Mentha because, for example, Peppermint Oil* was not included in this term "Mint Oil" 

since the committee had listed it separately on the 25b list. · 

Pennyroyal Oil, as derived from the Mentha pu/egium plant is very toxic and was not 

considered to be included in the term "Mint Oil" by the 25b rule development committee. 

"Mint and mint oil" as listed in 40CFR152.25(f) technically refers only to the "Wild 

mint" plant Mentha arvensis and oils derived from it as identified by the CAS# 68917-

18-0. However, since Spearmint Oil** was registered at the time of the 25b rule 

development, it appears that the committee intended for it to ·also be included under the 

term "Mint and mint oil". 

* Peppermint Oil, CAS # 8006-90-4, derived from the plant Mentha piperita. 

**Spearmint Oil, CAS # 8008-79-5, derived from the plant Mentha spicata: Synonym.-

Mentha viridis L., Other common names.-Mint, brown mint, garden mint, lamb mint, 

mackerel mint, Our Lady's mint, sage of Bethlehem. 

A chemindustry webpage indicates that CAS 68917-18-0 has the following synonyms: 

Com mint oil, Commint oil, Commint oil, Field mint oil, Japanese mint oil, 

Mentha arvensis oil, Mentha arvensos oil (Commint oil) (Mentha arvensis), Mentha 

oil,. Oil mentha arvensis, Oils, mint, Mentha arvensis piperascens, and Wild mint oil 

Summary for the 25b list: "Mint oil" is CAS # 68917-18-0 & CAS# 8008-79-5 

"Peppermint oil is CAS # 8006-90-4 

William R. Schneider, Ph.D. 

Biopesticides & Pollution Prevention Division (7511 P) 

Office of Pesticide Programs · 

US Environmental Protection Agency 

' I
§ 524.1044g Gentamicin, betamethasone, and clotrimazole ointment. ( a ) *Specifications.* Each gram (g) of ointment contains gentamicin sulfate equivalent to 3 milligrams (mg) gentamicin base, betamethasone valerate equivalent to 1 mg betamethasone, and 10 mg clotrimazole.
( b ) *Sponsors.* See sponsors in § 510.600(c) of this chapter for uses as in paragraph (c) of this section. ( 1 ) No. 000061 for use of 7.5- or 15-gram (g) tubes, 12.5-, 30-, or 215-g bottles.
( 2 ) No. 054925 for use of 7.5- or 15-g tubes; 10-, 15-, 25-, or 215-g bottles.
( 3 ) No. 069043 for use of 10-, 20-, 40-, or 215-g bottles.
( 4 ) No. 025463 for use of 7.5- or 15-g tubes, or 215-g bottles.
( c ) *Conditions of use in dogs* — ( 1 ) *Amount.* Instill ointment twice daily into the ear canal for 7 consecutive days. ( i ) From 7.5- or 15-g tubes; 10-, 12.5-, 15-, 25-, or 30-g bottles: 4 drops for dogs weighing less than 30 pounds (lb) or 8 drops for dogs weighing 30 lb or more.
( ii ) From 20-, 40-, or 215-g bottles: 2 drops for dogs weighing less than 30 lb or 4 drops for dogs weighing 30 lb or more.
( ii ) From 20- or 215-g bottles: 2 drops for dogs weighing less than 30 lb or 4 drops for dogs weighing 30 lb or more.
( 2 ) *Indications for use.* For the treatment of acute and chronic canine otitis externa associated with yeast (*Malassezia pachydermatis*, formerly *Pityrosporum canis*) and/or bacteria susceptible to gentamicin.
( 3 ) *Limitations.* Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian.
[58 FR 38973, July 21, 1993, as amended at 63 FR 31932, June 11, 1998; 68 FR 42970, July 21, 2003; 70 FR 8291, Feb. 18, 2005; 71 FR 13542, Mar. 16, 2006; 71 FR 16481, Apr. 3, 2006; 71 FR 38261, July 6, 2006; 71 FR 56867, Sept. 28, 2006; 78 FR 17597, Mar. 22, 2013; 79 FR 10969, Feb. 27, 2014; 81 FR 17608, Mar. 30, 2016]
# C_2014315EN.01003401.xml

| 15.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/34

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria regionale della Lombardia (Italy) lodged on 4 February 2014 — 3D I srl v Agenzia delle Entrate Ufficio di Cremona

(Case C-107/14)

2014/C 315/55

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Commissione tributaria regionale della Lombardia

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: 3D I srl

Applicant:

Defendant: Agenzia delle Entrate Ufficio di Cremona

Defendant:

By order of 17 July 2014, the Court of Justice (Third Chamber) declared the request for a preliminary ruling inadmissible.

---
Docket No. FAA-2012-0192

 Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 10/14/11

Regional Airline Association 10/14/11

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 10/14/11

ATA Joe White 10/14/11
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE UNAUDITED
INTERIM DECEMBER 31, 1997 BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS OF
FORCENERGY INC FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 3, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          16,048
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   43,502
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,231
<PP&E>                                         713,983
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 824,230
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          102,675
<BONDS>                                        506,564
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           255
<OTHER-SE>                                     214,736
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   824,320
<SALES>                                        281,690
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               284,185
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  410,556
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (3,354)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,422
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (155,439)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (20,621)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (134,818)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (5.83)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (5.83)
        

</TABLE>
# L_2019263EN.01004101.xml

| 16.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 263/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 263/41

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/1832 of 5 November 2018 amending Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Commission Regulation (EC) No 692/2008 and Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/1151 for the purpose of improving the emission type approval tests and procedures for light passenger and commercial vehicles, including those for in-service conformity and real-driving emissions and introducing devices for monitoring the consumption of fuel and electric energy

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 301 of 27 November 2018
  )

On page 34, in point (26)(a) of Annex I, in the amendment to Table 1 of Appendix 6 to Annex I to Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/1151:

for:

| ‘BH | Euro 6d-TEMP-EVAP | Euro 6-2 | N1 class II | PI, CI | | | 31.8.2019’ |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |

‘BH

Euro 6d-TEMP-EVAP

Euro 6-2

N1 class II

PI, CI

31.8.2019’

read:

| ‘BH | Euro 6d-TEMP-EVAP | Euro 6-2 | N1 class II | PI, CI | | | 31.8.2020’ |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |

‘BH

Euro 6d-TEMP-EVAP

Euro 6-2

N1 class II

PI, CI

31.8.2020’

On page 35, in point (26)(a) of Annex I, in the amendment to Table 1 of Appendix 6 to Annex I to Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/1151

for:

| ‘BI | Euro 6d-TEMP-EVAP | Euro 6-2 | N1 class III, N2 | PI, CI | | | 31.8.2019’ |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |

‘BI

Euro 6d-TEMP-EVAP

Euro 6-2

N1 class III, N2

PI, CI

31.8.2019’

read:

| ‘BI | Euro 6d-TEMP-EVAP | Euro 6-2 | N1 class III, N2 | PI, CI | | | 31.8.2020’ |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |

‘BI

Euro 6d-TEMP-EVAP

Euro 6-2

N1 class III, N2

PI, CI

31.8.2020’

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           5,571
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,142
<ALLOWANCES>                                       710
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,617
<PP&E>                                           6,305
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,956
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  36,157
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,619
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,336
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,822
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    36,157
<SALES>                                         23,646
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,646
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,727
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,731
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,246
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,225
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,021
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,021
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.16
        

</TABLE>
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 20

- 60485 Summary Calendar

**Maswin Sukotjo,**

Petitioner **,**

versus

**Merrick Garland,** U.S. Attorney General **,**
Respondent

**.**

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A096 274 197

Before **Southwick, Oldham,** and **Wilson,** Circuit Judges

.
**Per Curiam :**  * Maswin Sukotjo, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the denial of his February 2020 motion for reconsideration and reopening , which the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denied in May 2020. He argues only that the BIA abused its discretion by (1) failing to address

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 11, 2021

Lyle W. Cay ce Clerk Case: 20-60485 Document: 00515974833 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/11/2021No. 20

- 60485

2 equit able tolling arguments that he made exclusively in a July 2019 motion to reopen, which the BIA denied in January 2020, and (2) denying the July 2019
motion.
Sukotjo’s June 2020 petition for review was timely only with respect to the BIA’s May 2020 decisio n

. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1). Satisfying the deadline for filing a petition for review is mandatory and jurisdictional. Stone
v. INS , 514 U.S. 386, 405

- 06 (1995) . Since Sukotjo did not raise any equitable tolling arguments in the February 2020 motion p resently under review, and since he did not timely petition for review of the BIA’s January 2020 decision, we lack jurisdiction to consider his arguments. See Kane v. Holder , 581 F.3d 231, 237 & n.14 (5th Cir. 2009).
Sukotjo does not identify any error in the BIA’s denial of his February 2020 motion for reconsideration and reopening. Accordingly, he has waived any argument that the BIA erred in denying that motion by failing to brief it adequately. See Sharma v. Holder , 729 F.3d 407, 411 n.1 (5th Cir. 2013).
The petition for review is **DISMISSED IN PART** for lack of jurisdiction and **DENIED IN PART** 

. Case: 20-60485 Document: 00515974833 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/11/2021
§ 520.1310 Marbofloxacin. ( a ) *Specifications.* Each tablet or chewable tablet contains 25, 50, 100, or 200 milligrams (mg) marbofloxacin.
( b ) *Sponsors.* See sponsors in § 510.600(c) of this chapter for use as in paragraph (d) of this section: ( 1 ) Nos. 017033, 054771, and 086117 for use of tablets.
( 2 ) No. 086101 for use of chewable tablets.
( c ) [Reserved]
( d ) *Conditions of use* — ( 1 ) *Amount.* 1.25 mg per pound (/lb) of body weight once daily, but may be increased to 2.5 mg/lb of body weight once daily.
( 2 ) *Indications for use.* For the treatment of infections in dogs and cats associated with bacteria susceptible to marbofloxacin.
( 3 ) *Limitations.* Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian. Federal law prohibits the extralabel use of this drug in food-producing animals.
[64 FR 39919, July 23, 1999, as amended at 66 FR 46369, Sept. 5, 2001; 78 FR 28823, May 20, 2014; 85 FR 45307, July 28, 2020; 88 FR 27698, May 3, 2023]
#### Commonwealth v. Cicchino

*Frank J. Docktor,*for Commonwealth.

*John J. Mosehetta,*for defendant.

May 2, 1951.

Cummins, J.,

— Defendant in the above case was arrested by the Pennsylvania State Motor Police and charged with failure to yield one-half of the highway.

Defendant posted a $25 bond and waived the hearing before the magistrate to the court of quarter sessions.

*144This case being one of summary conviction, a hearing was held before the court on May 1,1951, at which time defendant filed a written motion to quash the information on the grounds that it was defective in its entirety in that it violates article 1, sec. 8, of the Constitution of Pennsylvania, being made on oath of the prosecutor as though he were an eyewitness, and failing to disclose that it is based upon information, and further, in failing to state his belief in the truth of the information received.

Defendant cited several cases in his brief to sustain his position, and among those cases cited is the case of Commonwealth v. Hockenberry, 72 D. & C. 274. In that case it was held that where an information charging a summary offense under The Vehicle Code of May 1, 1929, P. L. 905, such as reckless driving, in violation of section 1001, is based upon information received by complainant from others, it must aver that complainant believes the information to be true, and if it fails to do so, proceedings based upon such an information must be quashed.

Upon an examination of the information filed in the case at bar, such requirements do not appear, whereas it appears in the information that the prosecutor was the eyewitness to this violation of The Vehicle Code.

Upon hearing the testimony in the case, it appeared that the police officer obtained all of the information upon which he based his arrest on information received from others. Therefore, the information must be quashed.

And now, May 2, 1951, upon motion of counsel for defendant, the information in the above-entitled case is quashed, the costs to be paid by Washington County, and the clerk of courts is hereby ordered to return all moneys paid by defendant to the clerk of courts for the taking of this appeal.
#### § 520.90 Ampicillin oral dosage forms.
Reserve RD

Quemado RD

Quemado R

D

Spr ni gerville R

D

Pine Lawn

(State)

Head of

the Ditch

¬«435

¬«12

Green el e County

Catron County Catron County

Apache County

Þ¿49

Þ¿4000M

Þ¿545

Þ¿306

Þ¿35

Þ¿209

36Þ¿

2Þ¿20

Þ¿233

çå141

çå385

æäB

012

æäB

080

æäB

024

æäB

007

æäB

002

æäB

003

æäB

026

æäB

025

æäB

083

æäB

013

æäB

009

æäB

089

æäB

062

æäB

029

Lower San

Francisco

Plaza

Luna

Reserve

San

Francisco

Plaza

(/180

(/180

Arizona

New

Mex ci o

White

Bluff

7241

Maverick

Peak

7881

Dillon

Mountain

8694

Fox

Mountain

9127

Turner

Peak

9429

Maness

Mountain

8094

Mess Box

Mesa

7743

Black Bull

Peak

8369

Black

Peak

9006

San Francisco

Mountains

8465

Jones

Peak

9022

Hell Roaring

Mesa

8514

Freeman

Mountain

8773

Maness

Peak

8258

Higgins

Mountain

6486

Bishop

Peak

8855

Prairie

Point Peak

8333

Negrohead

Butte

7887

Maness

Mountain

7995

Monument

Mountain

8333

Horse

Mesa

8438

Jim Smith

Peak

9252

Joe Green

Peak

7897

Bill Lewis

Mesa

7260

Hellroaring

Mesa

7858

Bill Lee

Mesa

8219

Bar N L

Mesa

8136

Red Butte

8123

Turner

Peak

9170

Leggett

Peak

7930

Bar NL

Mesa

7644

§¦180

2

æäAP

4225

æäGR

67004

124

63

1261

769

62

351

33

36

515

9

21

34

35

119

761

762

126

109

125

64

956

61

Tularosa R.

Centerfire

Cr.

Stone Cr.

Coyote

Cr.

San Francisco R.

San

Francisco R. San Francisco R.

Dry BlueCr.

Blue

R.

San

Francisco R.

San Francisco R.

Dillman Cr.

Dry Blue

Cr.

Pace Cr.

Ston

Ce

r.

Trou

Cr

t

.

124

Frisco

Divide

62

Blue

Spri. Trail

351

Trout Creek

33

Freeman Mountain

Cam

36

p Canyon

515

Dangerous Park

9

Willie Steel

21

Flying T Spring

34

Dillion

Mountain

506

Aspen Mountain

35

Airstrip Mesa

119

Upper Cottonwood

761

Spur Ranch

762

Frisco

Box

126

Frieborn Canyon

109

Jim Smith

125

Mail Trail

118A

10

115

131

763

113

Luna Planning Area

Luna (185,586 ac.)

! City/Town

Stream

Highway

Improved Road, Paved

Improved Road, Gravel

Improved Road, Dirt

Unimproved Road

Non-motorized Trail

Motorized Trail

H H Transmission Line

National Forest Boundary

Ranger District Boundary

County Boundary

US Forest Service

FS Wilderness

Bureau of Land Mgmt.

Private

State

Arizona

New

Mex ci o

CCoorroonnaaddoo NNFF

CCiibboollaa NNFF

GGi

illaa NNFF

AAppaacchhee--SSiittggrreeaavveess

NNFFss

Location Map

Luna Planning Area

State Boundary

National Forest

Boundary

LUNA RESTORATION PROJECT: FIGURE 1

0 1 2 4

Miles

Created On: 5/9/2016 3:32:06 PM

Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 12NTransverse Mercator

o 1 in = 2 miles

1:125,000

(printed on 11" x 17" portrait layout)

Created By: jjelacic

The USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender

Figure 1: Location of the

Luna Restoration Project.

Planning area includes the

community of Luna, New Mexico

and the western portion

of the Quemado Ranger District.