alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 610.17 Permissible combinations.

Licensed products may not be combined with other licensed products either therapeutic, prophylactic or diagnostic, except as a license is obtained for the combined product. Licensed products may not be combined with nonlicensable therapeutic, prophylactic, or diagnostic substances except as a license is obtained for such combination.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-85,373-01

IN RE JOHN CHRISTOPHER ROSS, Relator

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

CAUSE NO. 1254204-A IN THE 182nd DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original

jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus

in the 182nd District Court of Harris County, that more than 35 days have elapsed, and that the

application has not yet been forwarded to this Court.

In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. Respondent, the District Clerk of Harris

County, is ordered to file a response, which may be made by submitting the record on such habeas

corpus application, submitting a copy of a timely filed order which designates issues to be

investigated (see McCree v. Hampton, 824 S.W.2d 578, 579 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992)), or stating that
2

Relator has not filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus in Harris County. Should the

response include an order designating issues, proof of the date the district attorney’s office was

served with the habeas application shall also be submitted with the response. This application for

leave to file a writ of mandamus shall be held in abeyance until Respondent has submitted the

appropriate response. Such response shall be submitted within 30 days of the date of this order.

Filed: August 3, 2016

Do not publish
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002





In 
connection  with the quarterly report of Avitar,  Inc. (the 
"Company") on Form10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the 
"Report"),  I, Peter P.  Phildius, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my
knowledge, that:





(1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report 
fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the 
financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.





Date:
February 14, 2008





/s/
Peter P. Phildius


---------------------


Peter
P. Phildius Chief


Executive
Officer
Editorial Note on Part 184
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 184 appear at 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; and 81 FR 49897, July 29, 2016.

§ 184.1978 Carnauba wax. ( a ) Carnauba wax (CAS Reg. No. 008-015-869) is obtained from the leaves and buds of the Brazilian wax palm *Copernicia cerifera* Martius. The wax is hard, brittle, sparingly soluble in cold organic solvents and insoluble in water. It is marketed in five grades designated No. 1 through No. 5. Grades No. 4 and No. 5 represent the bulk of the commercial trade volume. These commercial grades consist chiefly of C24 to C32 normal saturated monofunctional fatty acids and normal saturated monofunctional primary alcohols.
( b ) The ingredient meets the specifications of the Food Chemicals Codex, 3d Ed. (1981), p. 73, which is incorporated by reference. Copies are available from the National Academy Press, 2101 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20418, or available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .*
( c ) In accordance with § 184.1(b)(1), the ingredient is used in food with no limitation other than current good manufacturing practice. The affirmation of this ingredient as generally recognized as safe (GRAS) as a direct human food ingredient is based upon the following current good manufacturing practice conditions of use: ( 1 ) The ingredient is used as an anticaking agent as defined § 170.3(o)(1) of this chapter; as a formulation aid as defined in § 170.3(o)(14) of this chapter; as a lubricant and release agent as defined in § 170.3(o)(18) of this chapter; and as a surface-finishing agent as defined in § 170.3(o)(30) of this chapter.
( 2 ) The ingredient is used in the following foods at levels not to exceed current good manufacturing practice: baked goods and baking mixes as defined in § 170.3(n)(1) of this chapter; chewing gun as defined in § 170.3(n)(6) of this chapter; confections and frostings as defined in § 170.3(n)(9) of this chapter; fresh fruits and fruit juices as defined in § 170.3(n)(16) of this chapter; gravies and sauces as defined in § 170.3(n)(24) of this chapter; processed fruits and fruit juices as defined in § 170.3(n)(35) of this chapter; and soft candy as defined in § 170.3(n)(38) of this chapter.
( d ) Prior sanctions for this ingredient different from the uses established in this section do not exist or have been waived.
[48 FR 51147, Nov. 7, 1983]
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7370 

To amend the Geothermal Steam Act of 1970 to establish a deadline for 

processing applications related to geothermal leasing. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2024 

Mr. CURTIS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Geothermal Steam Act of 1970 to establish 

a deadline for processing applications related to geothermal leasing. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Geothermal Energy 

5 Opportunity Act’’ or the ‘‘GEO Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 7370 IH

1 SEC. 2. EFFECT OF PENDING CIVIL ACTIONS ON PROC2 ESSING APPLICATIONS RELATED TO GEO3 THERMAL LEASING. 

4 Section 4 of the Geothermal Steam Act of 1970 (30 

5 U.S.C. 1003) is amended by adding at the end the fol6 lowing: 

7 ‘‘(h) EFFECT OF PENDING CIVIL ACTIONS ON PROC8 ESSING APPLICATIONS RELATED TO GEOTHERMAL LEAS9 ING.— 

10 ‘‘(1) REQUIREMENT TO PROCESS APPLICA11 TIONS.—Notwithstanding the existence of any pend12 ing civil action that affects an application for a geo13 thermal drilling permit, sundry notice, notice to pro14 ceed, right-of-way, or other authorization or ap15 proval under a valid existing geothermal lease, the 

16 Secretary shall, unless a United States Federal court 

17 vacated the applicable geothermal lease, process each 

18 such application not later than 30 days after com19 pleting all environmental documents required under 

20 section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental 

21 Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)) for the 

22 authorization or approval. 

23 ‘‘(2) NO NEW AUTHORITY FOR FEDERAL

24 COURTS.—Nothing in this subsection shall be conVerDate Sep 11 2014 02:13 Feb 22, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H7370.IH H7370

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 7370 IH

1 strued as providing authority to a Federal court to 

2 vacate a geothermal lease.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
§ 556.770 Zoalene. ( a ) [Reserved]
( b ) *Tolerances.* The tolerances for zoalene and its metabolite 3-amino-5-nitro-*o*-toluamide are: ( 1 ) *Chickens.* ( i ) Liver and kidney: 6 ppm.
( ii ) Muscle: 3 ppm.
( iii ) Fat: 2 ppm.
( 2 ) *Turkeys.* Liver and muscle: 3 ppm.
( c ) *Related conditions of use.* See § 558.680 of this chapter.
Note (May 14, 2012): Availability of Appendix C and Appendix G

Appendices C and G are not available in Regulations.gov due to size restrictions (see Table 

below). However, they are available by request from the OPP Docket or by contacting the 

FIFRA SAP Designated Federal Official, Sharlene Matten, Ph.D. [tel: 202-564-0130; email: 

matten.sharlene@epa.gov].

White Paper

(Review Document) Author(s) Date

FIFRA 

10(g) 

Protected

Appendix C:

Open Literature Review of Amphibian 

Data

U.S. EPA May 2012 No

Appendix G.a.:

The PATI Model Working Program

U.S. EPA May 2012 No

Appendix G.b.:

Microcosm and Mesocosm and 

Atrazine Ecological Exposure 

Monitoring Program Input Files

U.S. EPA May 2012 No

Appendix G.c.:

PATI Output and CE-LOC Calculation U.S. EPA May 2012 No

Appendix G.d.:

Monitoring Data Processing Macro 

File

U.S. EPA May 2012 No

Appendix G.e.:

Summary of Monitoring Data, 

Including Listing Water Monitoring 

Sites That Exceed the Aquatic Plant 

Community Level of Concern

U.S. EPA May 2012 No

Appendix G.f.:

Breakdown of Species Tested in 

Ecotoxicity Studies

U.S. EPA May 2012 No

Appendix G.g.:

Log-Linear 95% C.I. Bias Factor 

Sensitivity Analysis Using AEEMP 

Monitoring Data

U.S. EPA May 2012 No

Appendix G.h.:

NAWQA Map Data: 60-Day 

Maximum Average 7 ppb Exceeders

U.S. EPA May 2012 No

Appendix G.i.:

NAWQA Map Data: Bias Factor 

Adjusted 4 ppb Exceeders

U.S. EPA May 2012 No

Appendix G.j.:

NAWQA Map Data: Bias Factor 

Adjusted 7 ppb Exceeders

U.S. EPA May 2012 No

Appendix G.k.:

NAWQA Map Data: 60-Day 

Maximum Average 4 ppb Exceeders

U.S. EPA May 2012 No
White Paper

(Review Document) Author(s) Date

FIFRA 

10(g) 

Protected

Appendix G.l.:

Monitoring Data Used in Bias Factor 

Estimation (Definitive Analysis)

U.S. EPA May 2012 No

Appendix G.m.:

Preliminary Bias Factor Analysis U.S. EPA May 2012 No

Appendix G.n.:

Monitoring Data Used in Bias Factor 

Estimation (Preliminary Analysis)

U.S. EPA May 2012 No

Appendix G.o.:

Crystal Ball Programs U.S. EPA May 2012 No

Appendix G.p.:

Crystal Ball Output Files U.S. EPA May 2012 No

Appendix G.q.: Bias Factor 

Calculation U.S. EPA May 2012 No
§ 556.260 Ethopabate. ( a ) [Reserved]
( b ) *Tolerances.* The tolerances for ethopabate, measured as metaphenetidine, are: ( 1 ) *Chickens.* ( i ) Liver: 1.5 ppm.
( ii ) Kidney: 1.5 ppm.
( iii ) Muscle: 0.5 ppm.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
( c ) *Related conditions of use.* See § 558.58 of this chapter.
§ 582.5997 Zinc sulfate. ( a ) *Product.* Zinc sulfate.
( b ) *Conditions of use.* This substance is generally recognized as safe when used in accordance with good manufacturing or feeding practice.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:**NationalSurvey of the mining population
pt 1 |pt 2
 
�
June 5, 2019
§ 520.1892 Pregabalin. ( a ) *Specifications.* Each milliliter (mL) of solution contains 50 milligrams (mg) pregabalin.
( b ) *Sponsor.* See No. 052483 in § 510.600(c) of this chapter.
( c ) *Conditions of use* — ( 1 ) *Amount.* Administer orally as a single dose of 5 mg/kg (0.1 mL/kg) approximately 1.5 hours before the start of the transportation or veterinary visit.
( 2 ) *Indications for use.* For alleviation of acute anxiety and fear associated with transportation and veterinary visits.
( 3 ) *Limitations.* Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian.
[89 FR 14410, Feb. 27, 2024]
§ 582.3169 Butylated hydroxyanisole. ( a ) *Product.* Butylated hydroxyanisole.
( b ) *Tolerance.* This substance is generally recognized as safe for use in food when the total content of antioxidants is not over 0.02 percent of fat or oil content, including essential (volatile) oil content of food provided the substance is used in accordance with good manufacturing or feeding practice.
###### Editorial Note on Part 369

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 369 appear at 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004.

#### § 369.8 Warning statements in relation to conditions for use.

The mention in any warning or caution statement included in subparts A, B, and C of this part, of a disease condition does not imply a finding on the part of the Food and Drug Administration that any drug or device is efficacious in such condition; nor is any drug or device bearing labeling referring to such disease condition precluded from regulatory action under the applicable provisions of the act if such claim is considered to be misbranding.
This is a request for a 333 exemption for use by a local agency and a state agency.

I personally own a DJI Phantom II Vision Drone. As Coroner, Chief Medical Examiner/ Investigator of Yazoo County, Mississippi. I am requesting the exemption to use my personal drone to assist in death investigations. I would like to be able to take Arial photographs as of automobile crashes and outdoor crime scenes that I am called upon to investigate. These photographs are an en hancement to me as well as law enforcement as I perform my duties in death investigations for the county, I would also like to pursue further use of the drone in Search & Rescue operations of Yazoo County, M i ssissippi as I am also a volunteer member of our Overland Search & Rescue unit. This could prove helpful by having the ability to use my drone as an additional resource. Further I am Central Team Leader for The Mississippi Mortuary Response Team. We are the state response unit for Mass Fatality Disaste rs. The drone could prove very beneficial for surveying a disaster location to assist in determining equipment and manpower needs, as well as where personnel need to be deployed. Note that I monitor Medical Aircraft frequencies as well as serve as the La nding Zone coordinator for Yazoo County. This allows me to know when this type aircraft is in the area and therefore no flights will be conducted unless I know t hat all airspace is clear. The flights that will be taken for this purpose will mainly be aro und 50 feet unless the area needing to be photographed is of a severely large area then flights should not exceed 100 feet . I am also well aware of aircraft operations as my father was a private pilot owning and flying A Cessna 172 when I was growing up in south Mississippi. Your consideration for this exception is greatly appreciated . Also please find attached where I have registered with you for UAS Registry number FA3O3MFLEX Sincerely; Ricky L. Shivers, Coroner, Chief Medical Examiner / Investigat or Yazoo County Mississippi

# UAS Registration Certificate

**Federal A**

**viation A dministration**  Small UAS Certificate of Registration CERTIFICATE HOLDER: **Ricky Shivers**  UAS CERTIFICATE NUMB ER: **FA 3P3MFLEX**  ISSUED: **12/22/2015** EX PI RES: **12/21/2018** For U.S. citizens, permanent residents, and certain non - citizen U.S. corporations, this document constitutes a Certificate of Registration. For all others, this document represents a recognition of ownership. For all holders, for all operations other than as a model aircraft under sec. 336 of Pub. L. 112-95, additional safety authority from FAA and economic authority from DOT may be required. **Safety guidelines for flying your unmanned aircraft:**

 Fly below 400 feet  Never fly near other aircraft  Keep your UAS within visual line of sight  Keep away from emergency responders

 Never fly over stadiums, sports events or groups of people  Never fly under the influence of drugs or alcohol  Never fly within 5 miles of an airport without first contacting air traffic control and airport authorities 

### View Profile Print
[No. 21110-6-II.

Division Two.

November 14, 1997.]

#### *In the Matter of the Marriage of*Paul Thompson, *Appellant,*and Madge Thompson, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 82-3-03912-7, Arthur W. Verharen, J., entered March 8, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Armstrong, J., concurred in by Bridgewater, A.C.J., and Hunt, J.
IIB 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7507 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 5, 2024 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 203 East 6th Street in Lexington, Nebraska, 

as the ‘William E. and Elsie L. Barrett Post Office 

Building. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

HR 7507 RFS

1 SECTION 1. WILLIAM E. AND ELSIE L. BARRETT POST OF2 FICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 203 East 6th Street in Lex5 ington, Nebraska, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘William E. and Elsie L. Barrett Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘William E. and Elsie 

11 L. Barrett Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 4, 

2024. 

Attest: KEVIN F. MCCUMBER, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
# C_2015171EN.01000701.xml

| 26.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/7

---

Request for a preliminary ruling made by the Sąd Rejonowy w Rzeszowie (Poland), lodged on 10 June 2014 — Przedsiębiorstwo Produkcyjno-Handlowo-Usługowe ‘Stylinart’ sp. z o.o. v Skarb Państwa — Wojewoda Podkarpacki, Skarb Państwa — Prezydent Miasta Przemyśla

(Case C-282/14)

(2015/C 171/10)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Referring court

Sąd Rejonowy w Rzeszowie

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Przedsiębiorstwo Produkcyjno-Handlowo-Usługowe ‘Stylinart’ sp. z o.o.

Applicant:

Defendant: Skarb Państwa — Wojewoda Podkarpacki, Skarb Państwa — Prezydent Miasta Przemyśla

Defendant:

By order of 11 December 2014, the Court of Justice of the EU ruled that it manifestly lacked jurisdiction to reply to the question referred by the Sąd Rejonowy w Rzeszowie.

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, I, Gordon L. Ellis, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify
that: 1. To my knowledge, this report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. To my knowledge, the information in this report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations as of
April 30, 2004. Date: June 9, 2004 /s/ Gordon L. Ellis   25
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD DRIVE

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

 OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

11/13/13

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Four Wheel Drive Dynamometer Meeting with the Alliance of Automobile 

Manufacturers and the Global Automakers

FROM: Christopher Laroo

TO: EPA Docket # EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0472

This memo documents a meeting held on 6/13/13 between representatives of the Alliance of 

Automobile Manufacturers, Global Automakers, ARB, and EPA to discuss the results of a test 

program to look at the effects of testing vehicles on four wheel drive dynamometers.

Two presentations discussing the test program results are enclosed. The results from the test 

program are inconclusive and indicate that there may be an unintended effect on fuel economy 

that could be attributed to the use of a four wheel drive dynamometer.

The discussion concluded that more testing and data are needed before requirements be made 

regarding four wheel drive dynamometer testing.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6319

TYREES COLOZA WHITEHEAD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

W. S. DICKERSON,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

CITY OF RICHMOND POLICE DEPARTMENT; CITY OF

RICHMOND,

Defendants,

UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE,

Party in Interest.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge.

(CA-91-220)

Submitted: June 12, 1997 Decided: June 18, 1997
2

Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tyrees Coloza Whitehead, Appellant Pro Se. William Joe Hoppe,

Senior Assistant City Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate

judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1994).

3

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the magistrate judge's order* denying relief

on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the

record and the magistrate judge's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate

judge. Whitehead v. Dickerson, No. CA-91-220 (E.D. Va. Feb. 12,

1997). We deny his "Motion to Amend Pleading Per F.R.C.P. 15(A)"

and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED