alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 20.54 Request for review without copying. ( a ) A person requesting disclosure of records shall be permitted an opportunity to review them without the necessity for copying them where the records involved contain only disclosable data and information. Under these circumstances, the Food and Drug Administration will charge only for the costs of searching for the records.
( b ) Where a request is made for review of records without copying, and the records involved contain both disclosable and nondisclosable information, the records containing nondisclosable information shall first be copied with the nondisclosable information blocked out and the Food and Drug Administration will charge for the costs of searching and copying.
[42 FR 15616, Mar. 22, 1977. Redesignated at 68 FR 25286, May 12, 2003]
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7218 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.7218

                     One Hundred Eighteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
         the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-four

                                 An Act

 
   To amend title III of the Public Health Service Act to extend the 
   program for promotion of public health knowledge and awareness of 
   Alzheimer's disease and related dementias, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``BOLD Infrastructure for Alzheimer's 
Reauthorization Act of 2024''.
SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PROGRAM FOR PROMOTION OF PUBLIC HEALTH KNOWLEDGE 
AND AWARENESS OF ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND RELATED DEMENTIAS.
    Section 398B(e) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 280c-
5(e)) is amended by inserting ``and $33,000,000 for each of fiscal 
years 2025 through 2029'' before the period at the end.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 23 - 0 029

_________________ ST ATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. TERESA MOCKO ,

Defendant and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Appellant Teresa Mocko was granted an extension of time to file and serve the opening brief on or before January 5, 2024 . The opening brief is now overdue. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Appellant shall prepare, file , and serve the opening brief on appeal no later th an February 20 , 2024 . Failure to file the brief within that time will result in dismissal of this appeal with prejudice and without further notice. The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to all parties .

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 17 2024

01/17/2024
Case Number: DA 23-0029
# C_2014303EN.01001802.xml

| 8.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 303/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/18

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Szegedi Törvényszék lodged on 11 June 2014 — Eurospeed Ltd v Szegedi Törvényszék

(Case C-287/14)

2014/C 303/24

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Referring court

Szegedi Törvényszék

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Eurospeed Ltd

Applicant:

Defendant: Szegedi Törvényszék

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Does the fact that a Member State is liable to make good damage resulting from a breach of EU law preclude the application of rules on liability when ruling on a claim for damages brought on that basis against the State body actually responsible for the breach? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does the fact that a Member State is liable to make good damage resulting from a breach of EU law preclude the application of rules on liability when ruling on a claim for damages brought on that basis against the State body actually responsible for the breach?

| 2. | If the answer to the first question is in the negative, does Article 10(3) of Regulation No 561/2006/EC (1) preclude the adoption of a national law by the Member State which, in the event of breach of the requirements laid down by the Regulation, provides for the imposition of a penalty on the driver who actually committed the breach in addition to or instead of the transport company? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the answer to the first question is in the negative, does Article 10(3) of Regulation No 561/2006/EC (1) preclude the adoption of a national law by the Member State which, in the event of breach of the requirements laid down by the Regulation, provides for the imposition of a penalty on the driver who actually committed the breach in addition to or instead of the transport company?

1

| 3. | If the answer to the second question is in the affirmative, must it be considered that a decision of a national administrative court which, instead of being based on Article 10(3) of Regulation No 561/2006, is based on national law contrary to that provision, is manifestly in breach of Union law? |
| --- | --- |

3.

If the answer to the second question is in the affirmative, must it be considered that a decision of a national administrative court which, instead of being based on Article 10(3) of Regulation No 561/2006, is based on national law contrary to that provision, is manifestly in breach of Union law?

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport and amending Council Regulations (EEC) No 3821/85 and (EC) No 2135/98 and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-25-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-27-1998
<CASH>                                           4,845
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   72,372
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,516)
<INVENTORY>                                     57,518
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               162,302
<PP&E>                                         132,226
<DEPRECIATION>                                (67,751)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 268,775
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           61,216
<BONDS>                                         49,475
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           113
<OTHER-SE>                                     155,870
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   268,775
<SALES>                                        132,521
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               132,521
<CGS>                                           78,308
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   78,308
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                56,043
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   147
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,278 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,830)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (669)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,161)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,161)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.12)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2014159EN.01001902.xml

| 26.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 159/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 159/19

---

Action brought on 31 March 2014 — European Commission v Republic of Latvia

(Case C-151/14)

2014/C 159/26

Language of the case: Latvian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: I. Rubene and H. Stølbæk)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Latvia

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | hold that it is not permissible to consider that the functions of a notary, as currently regulated by the Latvian legal system, constitute an exercise of official authority of the Member State, within the meaning of the exception set out in the first paragraph of Article 51 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and accordingly, hold that, in setting out a requirement of nationality for appointment as a notary, the Republic of Latvia’s legislation discriminates on grounds of nationality prohibited by Article 49 of the Treaty. |
| --- | --- |

—

hold that it is not permissible to consider that the functions of a notary, as currently regulated by the Latvian legal system, constitute an exercise of official authority of the Member State, within the meaning of the exception set out in the first paragraph of Article 51 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and accordingly, hold that, in setting out a requirement of nationality for appointment as a notary, the Republic of Latvia’s legislation discriminates on grounds of nationality prohibited by Article 49 of the Treaty.

| — | hold that, in making an appointment as a notary subject to a requirement of nationality, the Republic of Latvia has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 49 of the Treaty. |
| --- | --- |

—

hold that, in making an appointment as a notary subject to a requirement of nationality, the Republic of Latvia has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 49 of the Treaty.

| — | order the Republic of Latvia to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Republic of Latvia to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Commission submits that the nationality requirement for access to the notarial profession is discriminatory and constitutes a disproportionate restriction on freedom of establishment. Consequently, the Republic of Latvia has failed to fulfill its obligations under Article 49 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

The Commission submits that, by their nature, functions assigned to a notary in the Republic of Latvia’s legislation are not related to the exercise of official authority and that, consequently, the requirement of nationality for access to the notarial profession cannot be justified by the exception set out in Article 51 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---
§ 211.46 Ventilation, air filtration, air heating and cooling. ( a ) Adequate ventilation shall be provided.
( b ) Equipment for adequate control over air pressure, micro-organisms, dust, humidity, and temperature shall be provided when appropriate for the manufacture, processing, packing, or holding of a drug product.
( c ) Air filtration systems, including prefilters and particulate matter air filters, shall be used when appropriate on air supplies to production areas. If air is recirculated to production areas, measures shall be taken to control recirculation of dust from production. In areas where air contamination occurs during production, there shall be adequate exhaust systems or other systems adequate to control contaminants.
( d ) Air-handling systems for the manufacture, processing, and packing of penicillin shall be completely separate from those for other drug products for human use.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>     DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>          MAR-31-1997

<CASH>                      21,469,758 
<SECURITIES>                      0    
<RECEIVABLES>                5,108,972 
<ALLOWANCES>                   260,151 
<INVENTORY>                183,841,053 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  0    
<PP&E>                     120,472,972 
<DEPRECIATION>              41,152,908 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>             307,276,607 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             0    
<BONDS>                           0    
<COMMON>                          0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>             0    
<PREFERRED>                       0    
<OTHER-SE>                 224,127,278 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>307,276,607 
<SALES>                           0    
<TOTAL-REVENUES>            50,065,520 
<CGS>                       42,829,400 
<TOTAL-COSTS>               42,829,400 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>             7,158,178 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                  0    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                0    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 77,942 
<INCOME-TAX>                      0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             77,942 
<DISCONTINUED>                    0    
<EXTRAORDINARY>                   0    
<CHANGES>                         0    
<NET-INCOME>                    77,942 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                    (2.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                    (2.51)


        

</TABLE>
## F I F T H 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D 2 0 23

- 0484 LT Case No. 18

- CA

- 002529A

_____________________________
J EFFERY L. C ORBITT , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Robert M. Foster , Judge

. Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Ali L. Hansen, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach , for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General
, and David Welch, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

May 14, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L AMBERT , E ISNAUGLE , and B OATWRIGHT , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________
Exhibit 10.20




                                       May 28, 1997








Daniel P. Hart, Esq.
17 Whitney Street
Westport, CT  06880

Dear Dan:

         In light of Kim Carpenter's imminent departure,  I have asked you to be
responsible  for the  Company's  Human  Resources  department  and function on a
temporary basis. You have agreed to serve in that capacity for the period ending
September 1, 1997.

         In  consideration  of your  agreement  to  serve in the new  role,  the
Company  agrees that, in the event that you continue to be  responsible  for the
Human Resources  function beyond  September 1, 1997, the following  benefits and
agreements shall automatically (effective September 1, 1997) take effect:

         1.       Your  base salary shall be increased by fifteen (15%) percent;
                  and

         2.       Your  bonus in  respect  of 1997  shall  be paid in the  first
                  quarter of 1998 and shall be guaranteed to be a minimum of not
                  less than thirty five (35%)  percent of  your base salary; and

         3.       The two-year  severance  benefits you currently enjoy shall be
                  amended as follows:

                  (i)      you   shall  be   entitled   to   guaranteed   salary
                           continuation severance benefits,  without mitigation,
                           for a period of eighteen (18) months; and

                  (ii)     you   shall   be   entitled   to   six   (6)   months
                           non-guaranteed    severance   benefits    thereafter,
                           consistent with Company  practice in effect as of the
                           date hereof.




<PAGE>


Daniel P. Hart, Esq.
May 28, 1997
Page 2



         You shall  continue  to be entitled  to such other  severance  benefits
consistent with Company practice in effect as of the date hereof.

         This agreement is dated as of the date first written above.

                                       Sincerely,


                                       /s/ JOHN H. DUERDEN
                                       John H. Duerden

JHD/mgt

Agreed to and Accepted:


By:   /s/ DANIEL P. HART
   ------------------------------
         Daniel P. Hart
# L_2019009EN.01011301.xml

| 11.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 9/113 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 9/113

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2019/40

of 10 January 2019

on the minimum selling price for skimmed milk powder for the 30th partial invitation to tender within the tendering procedure opened by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2080

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (1),

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1240 of 18 May 2016 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to public intervention and aid for private storage (2), and in particular Article 32 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2080 (3) has opened the sale of skimmed milk powder by a tendering procedure. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2080 (3) has opened the sale of skimmed milk powder by a tendering procedure.

| (2) | In the light of the tenders received for the 30th partial invitation to tender, a minimum selling price should be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

In the light of the tenders received for the 30th partial invitation to tender, a minimum selling price should be fixed.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 30th partial invitation to tender for the selling of skimmed milk powder within the tendering procedure opened by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2080, in respect of which the period during which tenders were to be submitted ended on 8 January 2019, the minimum selling price shall be 155,40 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 January 2019.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Jerzy PLEWA

Director-General

Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 206, 30.7.2016, p. 71.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2080 of 25 November 2016 opening the sale of skimmed milk powder by a tendering procedure (OJ L 321, 29.11.2016, p. 45).

3

---
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Golden , ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 20 2 2

- Ohio

- 1865 .]

D ISCIPLINARY C OUNSEL v . G OLDEN . [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Golden , ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 20 2 2

- Ohio

- 1865 .]

(No. 20 12

- 0764

— June 1 , 202 2

— Decided June 3
, 20 2 2 .)
O N A PPLICATION FOR R EINSTATEMENT

.

__________________ __ {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Kenneth Louis Golden, Attorney Registration No. 0078441, last known address in West Hollywood, California. {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of July 12, 2012 , wherein the court, pursuant to former Gov.Bar R. V(11), suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of two years with twenty

- one months stayed and ordered that he would not be reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio until he was reinstat ed to the practice of law in the state of California, finds that respondent has complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24)

. {¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the s tate of Ohio. {¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(E)(2). {¶ 5} For previous case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Golden , 132 Ohio St.3d 1236, 2012

- Ohio

- 3149, 972 N.E.2d 599.
O ’C ONNOR , C.J., and K ENNEDY , F ISCHER , D E W INE , D ONNELLY , S TEWART , and B RUNNER , JJ., concur.

_______________ __
#### § 20.53 Use of private contractor for copying.

The Food and Drug Administration may furnish requested records to a private contractor for copying after deletion of all nondisclosable data and information. Under these circumstances, the Food and Drug Administration will charge the person requesting the records for all of the fees involved pursuant to § 20.45.

[42 FR 15616, Mar. 22, 1977. Redesignated and amended at 68 FR 25286, 25287, May 12, 2003]
Exhibit 32.1

 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Champion Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 1, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, William C. Griffiths, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Phyllis A. Knight, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

 

 
| /s/  WILLIAM C. GRIFFITHS                                |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| William C. Griffiths                                                                                       |
| Chief Executive Officer                                                                                    |
| Champion Enterprises, Inc.                                                                                 |
| May 1, 2006                                                                                                |
|                                                                                                       |
| /s/  PHYLLIS A. KNIGHT               |
| Phyllis A. Knight                                                                                          |
| Chief Financial Officer                                                                                    |
| Champion Enterprises, Inc.                                                                                 |
| May 1, 2006                                                                                                |