41898 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 138 / Friday, July 18, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 165 

[Docket No. USCG–2014–0620] 

RIN 1625–AA00 

Safety Zone; Annual Events in the 

Captain of the Port Detroit Zone— 

Lakeside Labor Day Fireworks, 

Lakeside, OH 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of Enforcement of 

Regulation. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce 

the Lakeside Labor Day Fireworks safety 

zone on Lake Erie in Lakeside, Ohio for 

the Lakeside End of Season Fireworks. 

This zone will be enforced from 9:45 

p.m. until 10:30 p.m. on August 30, 

2014. This action is necessary and 

intended to ensure safety of life on the 

navigable waters during the Lakeside 

End of Season Fireworks. During the 

aforementioned periods, the Coast 

Guard will enforce restrictions upon, 

and control movement of, vessels in the 

safety zone. No person or vessel may 

enter the safety zone while it is being 

enforced without permission of the 

Captain of the Port Detroit. 

DATES: The regulations in paragraph (c) 

of 33 CFR 165.941 will be enforced for 

the safety zone listed in paragraph 

(a)(27) of that section from 9:45 p.m. 

until 10:30 p.m. on August 30, 2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this document, 

call or email LT Jennifer M. Disco, 

Waterways Branch Chief, Marine Safety 

Unit Toledo, 420 Madison Ave., Suite 

700, Toledo, Oh, 43604; telephone (419) 

418–6049; email Jennifer.M.Disco@

uscg.mil. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast 

Guard will enforce the Lakeside End of 

Season Fireworks safety zone listed in 

paragraph (a)(27) in 33 CFR 165.941. 

Section 165.941 lists many annual 

events requiring safety zones in the 

Captain of the Port Detroit zone. This 

Lakeside End of Seasons Fireworks zone 

encompasses all waters and adjacent 

shoreline of Lake Erie located within an 

area that is approximately 560 foot 

radius of the fireworks launch site 

located at position 41°32′52′′ N, 

82°45′03′′ W. (NAD 83). This zone will 

be enforced between from 9:45 p.m. 

until 10:30 p.m. on August 30, 2014. 

All vessels must obtain permission 

from the Captain of the Port Detroit, or 

his or her on-scene representative to 

enter, move within, or exit the safety 

zone. Requests must be made in 

advance and approved by the Captain of 

the Port before transits will be 

authorized. Approvals will be granted 

on a case by case basis. Vessels and 

persons granted permission to enter the 

safety zone must obey all lawful orders 

or directions of the Captain of the Port 

Detroit, or his or her designated 

representative. 

This document is issued under 

authority of 33 CFR 165.941, Safety 

Zones; Annual events in the Captain of 

the Port Detroit zone, and 5 U.S.C. 

552(a). In addition to this publication in 

the Federal Register, the Coast Guard 

will provide the maritime community 

with advance notification of this event 

via Broadcast Notice to Mariners or 

Local Notice to Mariners. The Captain of 

the Port Detroit or his or her on-scene 

representative may be contacted via 

VHF Channel 16. 

Dated: July 3, 2014. 

S. B. Lemasters, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port Detroit. 

[FR Doc. 2014–16918 Filed 7–17–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R07–OAR–2014–0400; FRL–9913–81– 

Region–7] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; State of 

Missouri, Auto Exhaust Emission 

Controls 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is taking direct final 

action to approve the State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) revision 

submitted by the state of Missouri on 

January 14, 2014, for the purpose of 

removing an outdated rule. This action 

amends the SIP to remove a rule that 

was originally approved in 1972 but has 

now been rescinded. The rule’s purpose 

was to control emissions from all 

vehicles subject to required vehicle 

safety inspections in areas outside of the 

Kansas City, Springfield, and St. Louis 

metropolitan areas. Vehicle 

manufacturers now produce newer 

technology in exhaust emissions 

equipment in order to meet more 

stringent Federal motor vehicle 

standards. 

DATES: This direct final rule will be 

effective on September 16, 2014, 

without further notice, unless EPA 

receives adverse comment by August 18, 

2014. If EPA receives adverse comment, 

we will publish a timely withdrawal of 

the direct final rule in the Federal 

Register informing the public that the 

rule will not take effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07– 

OAR–2014–0400, by one of the 

following methods: 

1. www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

2. Email: higbee.paula@epa.gov. 

3. Mail or Hand Delivery: Paula 

Higbee, Environmental Protection 

Agency, Air Planning and Development 

Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard, 

Lenexa, Kansas 66219. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R07–OAR–2014– 

0400. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit through 

www.regulations.gov or email 

information that you consider to be CBI 

or otherwise protected. The 

www.regulations.gov Web site is an 

‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an email comment directly 

to EPA without going through 

www.regulations.gov, your email 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. 

Docket: All documents in the docket 

are listed in the www.regulations.gov 

index. Although listed in the index, 

some information is not publicly 

available, i.e., CBI or other information 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 138 / Friday, July 18, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 41899 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available either electronically in 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Environmental Protection Agency, 

Air Planning and Development Branch, 

11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, 

Kansas 66219. The Regional Office’s 

official hours of business are Monday 

through Friday, 8:00 to 4:30 excluding 

Federal holidays. The interested persons 

wanting to examine these documents 

should make an appointment with the 

office at least 24 hours in advance. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Paula Higbee, Environmental Protection 

Agency, Air Planning and Development 

Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard, 

Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at 913–551–7028, 

or by email at higbee.paula@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ 

or ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. This section 

provides additional information by 

addressing the following: 

I. What is being addressed in this 

document? 

II. Have the requirements for approval of a 

SIP revision been met? 

III. What action is EPA taking? 

I. What is being addressed in this 

document? 

EPA is taking direct final action to 

approve the SIP revision submitted by 

the state of Missouri on January 14, 

2014, for the purpose of removing an 

outdated rule. This action amends the 

SIP to remove a rescinded rule that was 

originally approved in 1972 and was 

intended to control emissions from all 

vehicles subject to required vehicle 

safety inspections in areas outside of the 

Kansas City, Springfield, and St. Louis 

metropolitan areas. In this action, EPA 

is removing rule 10 CSR 10–3.010 ‘‘Auto 

Exhaust Emission Controls’’ from the 

Missouri SIP. Since the most recent 

update to this rule in 1978, vehicle 

manufacturers have had to produce 

newer technology in order to meet more 

stringent Federal motor vehicle 

standards. Missouri rule 10 CSR 10– 

3.010 referred to exhaust emission 

control components that are no longer 

manufactured. This rule has been 

rescinded in Missouri, effective January 

30, 2014. 

II. Have the requirements for approval 

of a SIP revision been met? 

EPA has analyzed the state’s request 

and compared the provisions of the 

rescinded rule to current Federally 

approved provisions. Rescinding this 

rule will not have an adverse effect on 

air quality since current Federal motor 

vehicle emission standards are more 

stringent. The state submission has met 

the public notice requirements for SIP 

submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 

51.102. The submission also satisfied 

the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 

51, appendix V. In addition, as 

explained above the revision meets the 

substantive SIP requirements of the 

CAA, including section 110 and 

implementing regulations. 

III. What action is EPA taking? 

EPA is taking direct final action to 

remove 10 CSR 10–3.010 from the 

Missouri SIP. We are publishing this 

rule without a prior proposed rule 

because we view this as a 

noncontroversial action and anticipate 

no adverse comment. However, in the 

‘‘Proposed Rules’’ section of today’s 

Federal Register, we are publishing a 

separate document that will serve as the 

proposed rule to approve this SIP 

revision. If adverse comments are 

received on this direct final rule, we 

will not institute a second comment 

period on this action. Any parties 

interested in commenting must do so at 

this time. For further information about 

commenting on this rule, see the 

ADDRESSES section of this document. 

If EPA receives adverse comment, we 

will publish a timely withdrawal in the 

Federal Register informing the public 

that this direct final rule will not take 

effect. We will address all public 

comments in any subsequent final rule 

based on the proposed rule. 

Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

Act and applicable Federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely approves state law as meeting 

Federal requirements and does not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by state law. For that 

reason, this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under the terms of Executive 

Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 

1993) and is therefore not subject to 

review under Executive Orders 12866 

and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 

2011). 

• does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this rule does not have 

tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the state, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on tribal governments or preempt 

tribal law. 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by September 16, 2014. Filing a 

petition for reconsideration by the 

Administrator of this final rule does not 

affect the finality of this action for the 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

41900 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 138 / Friday, July 18, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

1 36 FR 8186 (April 30, 1971). 

purposes of judicial review nor does it 

extend the time within which a petition 

for judicial review may be filed, and 

shall not postpone the effectiveness of 

such rule or action. Parties with 

objections to this direct final rule are 

encouraged to file a comment in 

response to the parallel notice of 

proposed rulemaking for this action 

published in the proposed rules section 

of today’s Federal Register, rather than 

file an immediate petition for judicial 

review of this direct final rule, so that 

EPA can withdraw this direct final rule 

and address the comment in the 

proposed rulemaking. This action may 

not be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 

Incorporation by reference, 

Intergovernmental relations, Lead, 

Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate 

matter, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

Dated: July 1, 2014. 

Karl Brooks, 

Regional Administrator, Region 7. 

For the reasons stated in the 

preamble, the Environmental Protection 

Agency amends 40 CFR part 52 as set 

forth below: 

PART 52—[APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS] 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart AA—Missouri 

§ 52.1320 [Amended] 

■ 2. In § 52.1320 the table in paragraph 

(c) is amended by removing the entry for 

10–3.010. 

[FR Doc. 2014–16806 Filed 7–17–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R06–OAR–2013–0764; FRL–9913–94– 

Region–6] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; New 

Mexico; Grant County Sulfur Dioxide 

Limited Maintenance Plan 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is approving a limited 

maintenance plan submitted by the 

State of New Mexico, dated November 

1, 2013, for the Grant County 

maintenance area for the 1971 sulfur 

dioxide (SO2) National Ambient Air 

Quality Standard (NAAQS). New 

Mexico submitted this limited 

maintenance plan to fulfill the second 

10-year maintenance plan requirement, 

under section 175A(b) of the Clean Air 

Act (CAA or the Act), to ensure 

maintenance of the 1971 SO2 NAAQS 

through 2025. The EPA is approving the 

maintenance plan pursuant to the CAA. 

DATES: This rule is effective on 

September 16, 2014 without further 

notice, unless EPA receives relevant 

adverse comment by August 18, 2014. If 

EPA receives such comment, EPA will 

publish a timely withdrawal in the 

Federal Register informing the public 

that this rule will not take effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R06– 

OAR–2013–0764, by one of the 

following methods: 

• www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

on-line instructions. 

• Email: Mr. Guy Donaldson at 

donaldson.guy@epa.gov. Please also 

send a copy by email to the person 

listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT section below. 

• Mail or Delivery: Mr. Guy 

Donaldson, Chief, Air Planning Section 

(6PD–L), Environmental Protection 

Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200, 

Dallas, Texas 75202–2733. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R06–OAR–2013– 

0764. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit through 

www.regulations.gov or email, 

information that you consider to be CBI 

or otherwise protected. The 

www.regulations.gov Web site is an 

‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an email comment directly 

to EPA without going through 

www.regulations.gov, your email 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. For additional information 

about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA 

Docket Center homepage at 

www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm. 

Docket: All documents in the docket 

are listed in the www.regulations.gov 

index and in hard copy at EPA Region 

6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, 

Texas. While all documents in the 

docket are listed in the index, some 

information may be publicly available 

only at the hard copy location (e.g., 

copyrighted material), and some may 

not be publicly available at either 

location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard 

copy materials, please schedule an 

appointment with the person listed in 

the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT

paragraph below or Mr. Bill Deese at 

214–665–7253. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Dayana Medina (6PD–L), Air Planning 

Section, telephone (214) 665–7241, fax 

(214) 665–6762, email: medina.dayana@

epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ 

and ‘‘our’’ means EPA. 

Table of Contents 

I. Background 

II. Evaluation of New Mexico’s Submittal 

A. Has the State demonstrated that Grant 

County qualifies for the Limited 

Maintenance Plan option? 

B. Elements of a Limited Maintenance Plan 

for SO2

1. Attainment Emissions Inventory 

2. Demonstration of Maintenance 

3. Monitoring Network, Verification of 

Continued Attainment, and New 

Mexico’s Request To Discontinue the 

SO2 Hurley Monitor 

4. Contingency Plan 

III. Final Action 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. Background 

On September 11, 1978 (43 FR 40412), 

the EPA designated a portion of Grant 

County, New Mexico as a nonattainment 

area for the 1971 SO2 NAAQS 1 under 

Section 107 of the CAA. The area that 

was designated nonattainment is located 

within the Air Quality Control Region 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES