Febn.uan.v- 9,2015 

Sand~ R. Dicken.4on 

#1483568 ' 

'Polun4kv- llnht 

3872 F/fJ 350 5 Livin~4ton, Texa4 77351 

Dean. Non. Aco4ta: 

'Plea4e fin~ encLo4ed Applicant 14 Application fon. a Wn.lt of 

Man 1M d amu4; II pp 1 h · .P tlo' P 1 d icant n.eque~~ w~t _ n.e4pect ~on. v-oq fl e 4ai - :.".!, ~-- • - .• - .... • ........ "' ' ,..,, .. • 

Appnication and 4end him a date 4tamped copv- of the fon.e~oin~ 

fon. hi4 n.econ.d4 plea4e 5tn.. 

Thank v-ou fon. con.J.iden.lnfJ mv- n.eque4t. 114 I look fon.wan.d to 

hean.in~ fn.o~ v-ou 4oon. 

Sincen.elvRECE\VED 1N ~COURi OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 

fEB 12 ZO'S 

Atoe\ Acosta, Gler!-1. 
CtUSt No.09666890,I043378D 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

IN THt COUnT OF 

Cni/IJINAl A??tALS 

SANDY nAY oiCKtnSON OF AUSTIN, TeXAS 

?tTITION FOn A WniT OF /IJANDA/IJUS 

TO THt HONOnABlt 9UD~t OF SAID COUnT: 

CO/IJtS NOW, Sand~ na~ Oicken~on, fTDC9-IDJ No.l483568, 

heneon a~ AppLicant tiLe~ thi~ Wnit of /llandamu~ ?un~uant t~ 

Ant. 42.03, Sectli.on 2 (a) (I) of th~ Code ~df CniminaL AppeaL~ 

fquo~in~ ex ?ante /IJichaeL v. Count Yf CniminaL AppeaL~ Yf Texa~, 

319 S.W. 3d 695-696 (2010) move~ thi~ count fon a ?etitiicn fon 

a Wnit Y{ /llan~amu~ fon the nea~Yn~ ~et fonth beLow. 

The copie~ which ane attached tiJ the back of thi~ motlf.on, an 1d 

a~ ~nound~ thenefone wouLd ~how thi~ HononabLe Count a~ foLLow~: 

STATt/IJcNT OF FACTS 

I,. 

On 9anuan~ 17,2008 in cau~e No.09666890, the AppLicant a~need 

tiJ ~enve a tenm of I 2-~ean~, fon the IJ{fen~e of mundenj TO Bt 

StnVto CONCUnntNlLY. Stt exhibit A, Attached to ?eti~n. 

I. 
2. 

On 9anua~v 17,2008 in cau~e numbe~ 10433780, the AppLicant 

a~~eed to ~e~ve a te~m of 12-vea~~, fo~ the Yffen~e Yf A~~~avated 

7?obbe~v, "TO 8C. SC.7?VC.O CONCl17?7?C.NTl!J." 

to 'PetJ.{tJ.i.on. 

3· 

SC.C.. C.xhibit 8, Attached 

The C~iminaL Oi~t~ict Cou~t Numbe~ Fou~ awa~ded AppAicant to68-

dav~, of jaiL tlime c~edit on cau~e numbe~ 09666890 j. and 4 37-dav~, 

of jaiL time c~edit on cau4.e. numbe~ 10433780. SC.C. exhibit A and 

8, Attached to 'PetJ.lition. 

A~~llmC.NT AND Al1TH07?ITIC.S 

4. 

8ecau~e, the C~iminaL Oi~t~ict Cou~t Numbe~ Fou~ awa~ded Applji.cant 

10'68-dav~ of jaiL time c~edit on cau~e numbe~ 09666890, and onLv 

437-dav~ of jaiL tlime c~edit on cau4.e numbe~ 10433780, fTOC9-lOJ 

~aid that the AppLicant Wlll·di~cha~~e cau~e numbe~ 09666890 on 

2-13-2017, and Will di~cha~~e cau~e numbe~ 10433780 on 11-6-2018. 

SC.C. C.xh ib it C, AFF I OAV IT OF CHA7?lC.!J VAlOC..Z, Attached to 'Pe tlt.tlicn. 

5· 

The AppLicant contend~ that the C~iminaL Oi~t~i~t Cou~t Numbe~ 

Fou~ vioLated hi~ 8th, and 14th ll.S.C.~~j becau~e, the t~iaL 

cou~t ~entence him without ··i.t bein~ ~eco~ded. SC.C. C.xhibit 0, 

Attached to 'Petitlton. 

2. 
6. 

Th.e AppLicant contend.t~. that h.e h.a.t~. a due pn.oce.t~..t~. "Leg-itl;_~ate 

C..xp ec tat ion" th. at th. e .t~.en ten ce h.~ h. ea n.d o n.a LL !J p n.oniJun ced in 

th.e coun.tn.oom i.t~. th.e .t~.ame Aentence that h.e wiLL be n.equin.ed to 

.t~.en.ve. SC..C. C..x 'Pan.te f!ladding-, 70 S.W. 3d 131-137 (Tex. Cn.i.m. 

App. 2002J. 

7· 

Th.e AppLicant contenldA th.a.t th.e tn.iaL coun.t .bn.each.ed h.i.t~. pLea 

ag-n.eement bv on.den.ing- con.t~.ecutive .t~.entence.t~. in tn.iaL cau.t~.e 

numben. 09666890, and 10433780. SC..C.. ~n.een v. State, 242 S.W. 

3d 215-221 (Tex. App.-Beaumont 2007). 

8. 

Fun.th.en.mon.e, th.e AppLicant contend.t~. that h.e unden..t~.tood that h.e 

wouLd n.eceive no mon.e than. a combined 12-vean. .t~.entence. 

SC..C.. ~n.een v. State, 242 S.W. 3d 2.15-22/ (Tex. App.-Beaumont 2007). 

9· 

Becau.t~.e, AppLica~t n.eceived a Long-en. combined .t~.entence than h.e 

unden..t~.tood h.e wouLd n.eceive, AppLicant an.g-ue.t~. that h.i.t~. g-uiLtv 

plea.t~. wen.e invoLuntan.v• SC..C.. ~n.een v. State, 242 S.W. 3d 215-

221 (Tex. App.-Beaum~nt 2007). 

Th.e ~ppLicant" n.e.t~.pectfuLLv on.den. th.e HonYn.abLe Coun.t of Cn.iminaL 

AppeaL.t~. to i.t~..t~.ue an o~den. to th.e tn.iaL coun.t ~1en.ing- them t~ 

3· 
co~~ect the AppAicant~ p~e-~entence jaiL ~/..me c~edit to make 

the ~eco~d ~peak the 't~uth,. 

~AU~ · 

WHcJ?lF0.7?l fJ7?lffJI St.S CONSI~il7?llJ, AppL Lean t p ~av with ~e~pect that 

thi~ HonY4abLe cou•t ~·ant thi4 AppLication and l~4ue a w.tt Yt 

Mandamu~ di~ec~tn~ the C~lminaL lJL~t~ict Cou~t Numbe~ Fo~~ of 

Ta••ant Count!!, Texa~ tiJ lxecut e f}ud~ment in thl4 ca4ej and 

fo~wa'~·d a cop!f of the .. co~~ectllon tiJ CLa~.J.t{ica~ton and 7?eco~d,~ 

t ex a~ lJepa ~ tment IJf C ~ iminaL f}u~ t lee C o~~ec~i.on~ In~ t i tut ion~ 

lJivl~ion. 

UNSW07?N lJlClA7?ATION 

I, San1J!I 7?a!l lJicke~~on, fTlJCf}-llJJ No./483568, am p~e~entL!I 

inca~ce~at~ at· the ALLen 8. fJoLun~k!l U~it in fJoLk Count!!, Texa~ 

decla~e unde4. penalt!l of pe~:j.u•~ that the fact~ ~tat ed in thl~ 

document a~e t~ue and co~~ect tiJ the be~t IJf m!J. kniJwLJd~e. 

Cl7?7IFICA7l OF Sl7?VICl 

I, 5 and!! 7?a !I lJ icke ~~IJn, ce ~ t i I!! an IJ ~ i~inaL and one cop!f 

of AppLication fo~ w~Lt Yr Mandamu~, hM been maiLed fi~~t cLa~~ 

maiL to CLe~k AbeL Aco~t~, Cou•t of C~imlnaL AppeaL~ Sup~eme 

Cou~t BLd~, 201 W 14th St, 7?m /06, fJ.O. Box 12308-Au~tln, 

Texa~ 78711-2308, On Y~ befo~e the 9th da!l of Feb~uanv, 2015. 

4. 
5· 

:d~rilr lililcfflrut/N..,.. , TOC9-10, #!483568 ! 

ALLen B. ~oLun~kv UJit 

3872 F/fJ 350 5 Livin~~ton, Texa~ 77351 
THE STATE OF TEXAS 

VS. 

SANDY RAY DICKERSON 

A .. 

CASE NO. 09666890 

§ IN THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT 

COURT NUMBER FOUR 

TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS 

JUDGMENT ON PLEA OF GUILTY OR NOLO CONTENDERE BEFORE COURT 

WAIVER OF JURY TR1AL 

Judge Presiding 

Attorney tor Stale 

District Attorney 

Attorney ior Defendant 

Offense Date 

OCTOBER 6, 2002 

1ST 

Findings on Deadly Weapon 

Terms of Plea Bargain 

Plea w Enhancement 

Paragraph(s) 

Plea to Habitual 

Paragraph(s) 

Findings on Enhancement/ 

Habitual Paragraph(s) 

Date Sentence Imposed 

Punishment 

Place of Continement 

Time Credited 

Reparation 

Multiple Sentences 

HON. MICHAEL THOMAS 

TIM CURRY 

GREG WESTFALL 

Convicted Offense 

MURDER 

LESSER INCLUDED OFFENSE OF 

COUNT ONE 

Date of Judgment 

Assistant District 

Attorney 

JANUARY 17, 2008 

MICHELE HARTMANN 

DIXIE BERSANO 

Ci1arging lnsi.ruiilti1t: lNDiCTlvlE:NT 

GUILTY 

THE COURT AFFIRMA TIYEL Y FINDS THAT THE DEFENDANT USED OR EXHIBITED A 

DEADLY WEAPON, TO-WIT: AN OBJECT UNKNOWN TO THE GRAND JURY 

DURING THE COMMISSION OF THE OFFENSE OR DURING THE IMMEDIATE FLIGHT 

THEREFROM. 

12 YEARS ID 

NONE 

NONE 

NONE 

JANUARY 17.2008 Date to Commence : JANUARY 17,2008 

COUNT ONE- TWELVE (12) YEARS 

INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION OF THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE 

l068 DAYS Court Costs $253.00 

NONE Restitution NONE 

DEADLY WEAPON FINDING NOTICE - AFFIRMED 

TO BE SERVED CONCURRENTLY 

WITH SENTENCE(Sl RENDERED IN TARRANT COUNTY 

On this day, set torth above, this cause came tor trial and came the State of Texas by its above-named attorney, and the 

Defendant appeared in person and by the above-named attorney for the Defendant, or, where a Defendant is not represented by 

counsel, that the Defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived the right to representation by counsel; and announced 

ready for trial, the Defendant having been heretofore arraigned, or having waived arraignment in open coun, and having agreed 

that the testimony may be stipulated in this cause and the Defendant, his counsel, and the State's attorney having agreed in writing 

in open court to waive a jury in the trial of this cause and to submit this cause to the Court, and the Coun having agreed tO the 

VOLUME PAGE A OF CASE NO. 09666390 
EXHIBIT ~-"--~ :.---·---------

same, the said attorney for the· state read the inotT\Iment charging the offense as shown or the re<~ding of the charging instrument 

having been waived by the Defendam in open court; the Defendant entered the abov~ shown plea thereto: and it appearing to the 

Court th~t the Defendant is mc:mally competent and the plea is free and voluntary. and the Court having duly admonished the 

Defendant as to the consequtn:es or such plea, including the range of punishment a!!ached to the offense and the fact that any :coommend~tion of tho prosewt!ng aaorney as to punishment is not bind;ng on the Court, yet the Defendant persisted in entering 

s~ch plea: said plea is by the Co~rt received a.1d now entered of record upon the minutes of the Court, is of the o;Jinion and. so 1inds thtt the said Defendant is guilty of the offense as confessed and set forth above. 

And when shown above, that the charging ii1strument contains enhancemer.t paragraph(s}, which were not waived. 

and alleges Defendant to have been convicted previously of any felony or offenses for !he purpose of enhancement of punishmem 

then the Court asked Defendant if st:ch allcgatio~s were true or false and Defendant a.1swered TT\Ie. Thereupon. !he Court, after 

having teard all of !he evidence as to such alleged prior convictions, is of the opinion and find& Defendant has been heretofore 

convicted as alleged in said e•thancement paragraph(s) as may be shown above. 

IT IS THEREFORE CONSIDERED AND ORDERED by the Court. in the presence of the Defendant, that said judgment 

be. and the same is hereby in alllhings ap~roved 211d confirmed, and that said Defendar.t is adjudged guilty of !he offense set fonh 

above, by the Court (a jury having been waived in accordance with law) and that said Dcfcncant be punished in accordance with 

terms set forth above, and the Defendant is senrenced to a term of imprisonment or fine or both as set forth above, and be 

wi:h tenr.s set forth above. a.~d !he Defendant is sentenced 10 a tenn of imprisonmem or fine or both as set forth above, ar.d be 

delive:cd by th~ Sheriff !0 :he Director of lhc·Instirurion~l Division o·- the Texas n~parlrr:tt.t cf Cd::1~.:ci J~:sliO;, or !!!l:c; i't:fSC•; 

:c~:tliy .:~thori~d ~c r::;ceive ~~c:t ::onvicts f~: th~ punishmcm and ::-.ect:iion may 1~s:ue as m:::essat)'. 

. A:-,d, if ~hown above th.a:. C·~fcndar.t h~s been Gu:; ... : a..-1~ legafly ,:L;nvict.:d t>r a prior offense by s~owing the COUrt. 

:-::.:;::: n:::":lbc.r, :.~•d o!{;::::::·~:;i:,:=-aher O.·:it:~ ·i~::o p1.:n;;hrn~;·1~ for such t:~ffr:.ilsc: "-''~ dau: Dcr~.;::;...;-,~·wQ\i set\-;Cnccd fer $,;.;~h vffCr;sc in 

•:em dance wah such convictioa. then iris further ORDERED AND ADJUDGED thalthe p~nishm~m herein adjudged against the 

said Delendanr shall begin when :he judgment and sentence in such pri•Jr offense. when shown above, shall have ceased to operate. 

And til~ said Defer.aanr is remanced to jaii unUI said Sheriff can obey the direction of this judgment. 

?mrr5TNGJ0DGE 

Date Signed : JANUARY 17, 2008 

Nor ice of Appeal 

ML~d~!e Received 

VOLUME PAGE B OF CASE NO. 0966689D 

~ .. · ... ~. 

' 

.. ' 
~XHIB.I."T 

CASE NO. 1043378D 

'HE STATE OF TEXAS 

.'S. § 

iA.NDY RAY DICKERSO!\ § 

IN THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT 

CO"C'RT Nt;MBER FOCR 

TARRA:-.;T COUNTY, TEXAS 

JUDGMENT ON PLEA OF GUILTY OR NOLO CONTENDERE BEFORE COURT 

WAIVER OF .JURY TRIAL 

udgc Pr~siding 

\Hornoy to: State 

)isrricr Auomey 

)CTOBER 13. 2002 

ST 

=:~:di1;gs on Je::.Jiy \Vc::pon 

)CTOBER !"3, 2002 

.ST 

~i!~din£s on 

)eJd!~7Weapon 

)ffe~se Date 

}(TOBER 13. :2002 

1ST 

Find:ngs on 

De:-Jdly \Vt::ipun 

Terms of Plea Bargain 

Plea to Enhaucerr:em 

P:u-agraph(s) 

Plea 10 Habttual 

Paragraph(s) 

HOI'. MICHAEL THOMAS 

TIM CURRY 

GREG \VE5T~ALL 

JOETTA KEENE 

Convicted Offense 

Date of Judgment 

Assis.tam. Disirict 

A.tto:ney 

JANUARY 17, 2008 

MICHELE HAR'T\·IANN 

DIXIE BERSA!';O 

Charging lnstrumem; l:-iDlCIMENT 

AGGRAVATED ROBBERY WITH A DEADLY WEAPON, TO-WiT: A FiREARM 

ONE Gl)ILTY 

THE CO\JRT AFFIRMATIVELY Fll\DS THAT THE DEFENDANT !JSED OR .EXH!3lTED A 

DE.-\DL Y WEAPON, TO-WIT: A F!REAR1vl 

DURING THE COMMISSION OF THE OFFENSE OR DURING THE IMMEDIATE FLJGHT 

THEREFROM. 

Convicrcd Offense 

AGGRAVATED ROBBERY WITH A DEADLY WEAPON, TO-\ViT: A FIREARM 

TWO GUILTY 

THE COURT AFFIRMATIVELY FINDS THAT THE DEFENDANT USED OR EXHIBITED A 

DEADLY WEAPON, TO-WIT; A FIREARM 

DURING THE COl'viMISSION OF THE OFFENSE OR DCRING THE IMMEDIATE FLIGHT 

THEREFROM. 

Convicted Ofr'ensc 

AGGRAVATED ROEBERY WITH A DEADLY WEAPON, TO-WIT:.:.. FIR EAR'.-! 

THREE GUILTY 

THE COURT AFHRMATIVEL Y FINDS THAT THE DEFE!':DA:\T CSED OR EXHIBITED A 

DEADLY \'lEAl'ON, TO-WIT: A FIREARM 

DURING THE COM~v!ISSION OF THE OFFENSE OR DuRING THE IMMEDIATE FLlGilT 

THEREFROM. 

12 YEAR ID 

KONE 

KONE 

----·--------------------------------

Findings on Enhancementi 

Hzbitual Paragraph(sl NONS .·· .. 

YOLLJME PAGE:\ OF CASE NO. iG43378D TRA~::> - N ·o . -L J'fr...~ t-' 

l til!~ ~lillliilllllll~lllil~lllll!l11ililllll!l !

1

1! Ill! 
EX l-IlB.I T 

Date Sentence Imposed JANUARY 17, 2008 Date to Commence : JANUARY 17, 2008 

Punishment COUNT ONE- TWELVE (12) YEARS 

Place of Confinement INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION OF THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE 

Punishment COUNT TWO- TWELVE (12) YEARS 

Place of Confinement INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION OF THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE 

Punishment COUNT THREE- TWELVE (12) YEARS 

Place of Confinement INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION OF THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE 

Time Credited 437 DAYS Court Costs $253.00 

Reparation NONE Restitution NONE 

Multiple Sentences TO BE SERVED CONCURRENTLY 

WITH SENTENCE($) RENDERED IN TARRANT COUNTY 

On this day, set forth above, this cause came for trial and came the State of Texas by its above-named attorney, and the 

Defendant appeared in person and by the above-named attorney for the Defendant, or, where a Defendant is not represented by 

counsel, that the Defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived the right to representation by counsel; and announced 

ready for trial, the Defendant having been heretofore arraigned, or having waived arraignment in open court. and having agreed 

that the testimony may be stipulated in this cause and the Defendant, his counsel, and the State's attorney having agreed in writing 

in open court to waive a jury in the trial of this cause and to submit this cause to the Court, and the Court having agreed to the 

same, the said attorney for the State read the instrument charging the offense as shown or the reading of the charging instrument 

having been waived by the Defendant in open court; the Defendant entered the above shown plea thereto; and it appearing to the 

Court that the Defendant is mentally competent and the plea is free and voluntary, and the Court having duly admonished the 

Defendant as to the consequences of such plea, including the range of punishment attached to the offense and the fact that any 

recommendation of the prosecuting attorney as to punishmem is not binding on the Court, yet the Defendant persisted in entering 

such plea; said plea is by the Court received and now entered of record upon the minutes of the Court, is of the opinion and so 

finds that the said Defendant is guilty of the offense as confessed and set forth above. 

And when shown above, that the charging instrument contains enhancement paragraph(s), which were not waived, 

and alleges Defendant to have been convicted previously of any felony or offenses for the purpose of enhancement of punishment 

then the Court asked Defendant if such allegations were true or false and Defendant answered True. Thereupon, the Court, after 

having heard all of the evidence as to such alleged prior convictions, is of the opinion and finds Defendant has been heretofore 

convicted as alleged in said enhancement paragraph(s) as may be shown above. 

IT IS THEREFORE CONSIDERED AND ORDERED by the Court, in the presence of the Defendant, that said judgment 

be, and the same is hereby in all things approved and confirmed, and that said Defendant is adjudged guilty of the offense set forth 

above, by the Court (a jury having been waived in accordance with law) and that said Defendant be punished in accordance with 

terms set forth above, and the Defendant is sentenced to a term of imprisonment or fine or both as set forth above, and be 

with terms set forth above, and the Defendant is sentenced to a term of imprisonment or fine or both as set forth above, and be 

delivered by the Sheriff to the Director of the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, or other person 

legally authorized to receive such convicts for the punishment and execution may issue as necessary. , 

And, if shown above that Defendant has been duly and legally convicted of a prior offense by showing the court, 

cause number, and offense together with his punishment for such offense and date Defendant was sentenced for such offense in 

accordance with such conviction, then it is further ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the punishment herein adjudged against the 

said Defendant shall begin when the judgment and sentence in such prior offense. when shown above, shall have ceased to operate. 

And the said Defendant is remanded to jail until said Sheriff can obey the direction of this judgment. 

PRESIDING JUDGE 

Date Signed : Jf\NUARY 17,2008 

Notice of Appeal 

Mandate Received 

VOLUME PAGE B OF CASE NO. 10433780 
EXH 

STATE OF TEXAS 

COUNTY OF WA.LKER 

( 

No. C-4-009049.,.0966689-A 

No. C-4-009048-1043378-A 

AFFIDAVIT OF CHARLEY VALDEZ 

( 

FILED · 

1'HOAfAS A WilDER, DIST. CLERK 

TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAs 

JUL 29 2010 

"t:e-,~~b~~~-D-E_RJTY ___ -

BEFORE ME, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Texa~, on this day 

personally appeared Charley Valdez, who, after being duly sworn, deposes as follows: 

"My name is Charley Valdez. I am over twenty-one years of age, of sound mind; capable of 

making th.is affidavit; and personally acquainted with the facts herein stated. 

I am employed as Program Supervisor II for the Classification and Records Department 

("CRD") of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Corrections Institutions Division, and my office 

is located in Huntsville, Texas. I have reviewed time records kept by the CRD regarding offender 

Sandy Ray Dickerson, TDCJ # 1483568. CRD maintains these records in the regular course of 

business of every offender confined; and it was the regular course of business for an employee or 

representative to TDCJ-CID with knowledge of the act, event, condition, opinion or diagnoses, . 

recorded to make the record or to transmit information thereof to be reasonably soon thereafter. Based 

on my review of these records, . the following table contains the current sentence information for 

Dickerson. 
EX ~-1- , ~ t+ ~l r . Dickerson, Sandy Ray 'J(J)CJ# 1483568 

P~ge2 

Aggravated 

Robbery Tarrant 1043378D 

3-counts 

12-years 10-13-2002 1-17-2008 11-6-2006 

437-days 

.(ail credit · 

W/DW 

Firearm 

3-counts 

Murder Tarrant 0966689D 12-years I 0-13-2002 

·, 

1-17-2008 2-13-2005 ' 

1068-days 

· -. j :ill credit 

11-6-2018 

2-13-20~7' 

1. Has the applicant made a claim through the time credit resolution system of the Institutional Division 

of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice? 

ANS: Pursuant to Texas Government Code§ 501.0081, this office received a time dispute resolution 

form from Ap!1licant on 3-19-2008, and responded to the Applicant on11-15-2008. This office responded 

to the Applicantthat there was no error in his current time calculations, and was furtheYadvised thafifhe 

was dissatisfied with this response that he should contact State Counsel for Offenders for further 

assistance. \ · ·, 

2. What time credit(s), if any, have been applied to the applicant's sentences in these cases? 

ANS: Criminal District Court Number Four awarded Applicant 437-days of jail credit on cause number 

1043378D (3cts.) and 1068-days ofjail credit on cause number 0966689D. 

3. What total credits(s) does the applicant currently have toward the completion of his sentences? 

ANS: Applicant has a total of 3-years, 7-months, and 18-days toward completion of his sentence because 

cause number 1043378D only allowed 437-days of jail credit, making this the controlling sentence of 

record. 

4. What is the applicant's projected release date? 

ANS: Applicant has a maximum discharge date of 11-6-2018 due to the fact that he is not eligible for 

mandatory supervision release because he is serving sentences for offenses, Aggravated Robbery with a 1 

Deadly Weapon Firearm (3 counts) and Murder, that are described in Texas Government Code§ 508.149 

(a). 

5. What is the applicant's maximum discharge date? 

ANS: Applicant has a maximum discharge date of 11-6-2018. 
~X,H \ b \+ Cp·( i 

Dickerson, Sandy Ray TUCJ# 1483568 

Page 3 

( 

CHARLEY VALDEZ 

Program Supervisor II 

Classification and Records 

Texas Department of Criminal Justice 

Corrections Institutions Division 

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me, the said Notary Public on this the_ 22nd 

day of July, 2010, to certify which witness my hand and seal of office. 

Notary Public In and For 

'The State ofTexas 
KIM CH£RR'i, CSR7) R~R 

OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER 

. CRIMINAL Dl1STRJCT COURT NO .. 4 

401l "W .. , BELKNAPw STH FLOOR 

FORTWORTHI) TEXAS 76196 

81 7-884~2597 

September 3,2013 

Mr. Sandy R. Dickerson 

#01483568 

3872 FM 350S 

Livingston; Texas 77351 

In re: Cause No. 1043378D; State vs. Sandy Ray Dickerson 

Court of Appeals No. 02-13-00079-CV 

Dear Mr. Dickerson: . 

This is in response to your letter dated 8/19/13 wherein vou request "a copy of the minutes sentencing 

and Judgment transcripts." 

doo8 

I was the official court reporter when the above-referenced cause went to trial in January of 1998. I 

have researched the records, and the. trial that commenced on January 14th, 2008, ended in a plea to~~~-~ 

Court on January 17, 2008. The voir dire and trial on the merits were recorded by me, but the plea and 

sentencing by the Court on January 17th, 2008, was not requested to be recorded by me. Therefore, 

there is no Reporter's Record regarding your request. 

If I cari be offurtherassistan.ce; please do not hesitate to contact me. 

Si~c~~~ 

·~CJw 

Official 

Kim Cherry 

Court 

. 

Reporter-

. ~ CDC4 ·. 

Tarrant County, Texas 

cc: Debra Spisak, Second Court of Appeals 

. 0