alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In The Matter Of 

SERVED: July 1, 2015 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0324 

GLOBAL AIRCRAFT 

INTERIORS, INC. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 2011 EA 11 0043 

Respondent 

ORDER SETTING LITIGATION SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 

.··',_ 

On May 20, 2015 an Order Setting Deadlines and New Status Conference was filed. 

Pursuant to this May 20, 2015 Order, the parties appeared by telephone for a Status Conference 

on Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 1:30pm Eastern time, and reported on the status of the proceedings. 

During this Status Conference, both parties agreed that they needed additional time to discuss 

settlement options and the status of the case. 

· Having reviewed and considered the case file, all pleadings and motions, all relevant 

caselaw, statutes, regulations, rules, and authority, and being fully advised; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

1. On Tuesday, August 11,2015 at 1:30pm Eastern time, the parties shall re-convene for 

a Litigation Scheduling Conference. At that time, the parties will discuss discovery 

deadlines and other litigation matters, and schedule a new Hearing date. To access the 

Court's conference line, the parties shall call 202-493-2343. 

2. For clarifications of this order or questions with regard to the procedures to be followed 

in this case, please contact Mr. Cody L. Smith, Attorney-Advisor, at the Office of 

Hearings (202-366-6941). 

Attachment: Service List 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 000 1 

Mr. Zachary M. Berman 

Complainant's Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

TEL: 718-553-3258 

FAX: 718~995-5699 

Mr. Robert Roth 

Respondent's Lay Representative 

2075 Smithtown Avenue 

Ronkonkoma, NY 11 779 

TEL: 631-981-8470 

Judge J.E. Sullivan· 

US. Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

ONE COPY 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-6941 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0324 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W 1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
**UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD DRIVE ANN ARBOR, MI 48105 - 2498 OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION **11 /**  **13 /13**  MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Four Wheel Drive Dy namometer Meeting with the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers and the Global Automakers FROM: Christopher Laroo TO: EPA Docket # EPA - HQ - OAR - 2009 - 0472 This me mo documents a meeting held on 6 / 1 3 /13 between representatives of the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, Global Automakers, ARB, an d EPA to discuss the results of a test program to look at the effects of testing vehicles on four wheel drive dynamometers. Two presentations discussing the test program results are enclosed. The results from the test pro gram are inconclusive and indicate that there may be an unintended effect on fuel econom y that could be attributed to the use of a four wheel drive dy namometer. The discussion concluded that more testing and data are needed before requirements be made reg arding four wheel drive dy namometer testing .
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Balance Sheet and Statement of operations as of and for the 39 weeks ended
October 31, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements as included in the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000813775
<NAME>                                         Family Bargain Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 AUG-2-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                         5,279
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    41,566
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               49,673
<PP&E>                                         27,933
<DEPRECIATION>                                 11,102
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 100,604
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          44,246
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    36
<COMMON>                                       15
<OTHER-SE>                                     10,998
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   100,604
<SALES>                                        224,929
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               224,929
<CGS>                                          149,336
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  149,336
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               73,606
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3,443
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,456)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   159
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,615)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (2,750)
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,168)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (6.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (6.11)
        


</TABLE>
Burn Wise

P rogra m o f U .S. E PA

$270 

Wood Shed

(price dependant on locality)

Build a Firewood Storage Shed

• Holds about one cord of wood

• Light enough to move by hand

• Easy to fabricate with mostly straight cuts and no mitered

corners or joints

• Uses outdoor treated wood for the structure and liquid roofing 

primer for the roof

• Connectors and fasteners are galvanized

• Roof and sides are finished to owner specifications

(e.g. composition, metal, wood shakes, etc.)

• Footings provided by owner (concrete post bases or pavers) 

www.epa.gov/burnwise
(1) 4’ x 8’ x 1⁄2” CDX Plywood Roof

Attach with 11⁄2” deck screws every 6” along

each rafter. Apply liquid roof to top side of roof.

(6) 2” x 4” x 4’ Roof Rafters

Attach with (2) 3” deck screws at each post.

(4) 1” x 4” x 89“ Rear Slats

Attach with (2) 3” deck screws at each post.

(8) 1” x 4” x 45“ Side Slats

Attach with (2) 11⁄2” deck screws at each post.

(3) 4’ x 4‘ x 6’ Posts in the Front of Shed

Attach each post with (2) 1⁄4” x 5” hex lag screws.

(3) 4’ x 4‘ x 5’ 6“ Posts in the Rear of Shed

Attach each post with (2) 1⁄4” x 5” hex lag screws.

(5) 1” x 4” x 8’ Floor Slats

Attach with (2) 11⁄2

(8) 2” x 4” x 4’ Floor Joists

(2) 2” x 6” x 8’ Front and Rear Floor Frame

Attach to both (2) 2

with 3” deck screws.

(6) 12” Concrete Deck Blocks

Based on and modified from the Makah Tribe’s Modular Wood Shed design

Wood Shed Material List

ITEM QTY DESCRIPTION UNIT COST SUBTOTAL

2” x 6” x 8’ Treated Pine 2 Floor Frame $5.27 $10.54

1” x 4” x 8’ Treated Pine 13 Floor Slats, Side & Back Slats $4.97 $64.61

2” x 4” x 8’ Treated Pine 8 Floor Frame, Joists, Roof Rafters $3.37 $26.96

4” x 4” x 12’ Treated Pine 3 Posts $13.17 $39..51

4’ x 8‘ x 1⁄2” CDX Plywood 3 Roof $15.77 $15.77

1⁄4” x 5” Hex Lag Screws 12 Secure posts to 2” x 6”& 2” x 4” Floor Frame $0.54 $6.48

3” Galvanized Deck Screws 1lb. Box Secure Floor Frame, Joists & Roof Rafters $9.89 $9.89

11⁄2” Galvanized Deck Screws 1lb. Box Secure Floor Slats, Side & Back Slats, Roof $9.89 $9.89

1-5 Gal Weather Protection $47.00 $47.00

12” Deck Bolts 6 $6.55 $39.30

TOTAL $269.95

To view a 6 minute video on how to build

this rewood storage shed, go to:

www.epa.gov/burnwise/burn-wise-videos
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The Honorable Kenneth F. Ripple, Senior United States Circuit Judge

for the Seventh Circuit, sitting by designation.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NORMA JUDITH PAIZ CRUZ,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER JR., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 06-73048

Agency No. A070-828-894

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted November 3, 2010

Pasadena, California

Before: PREGERSON, RIPPLE,** and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Norma Paiz Cruz petitions for review of the Board of Immigration

Appeals’ affirmance of the immigration judge’s ("IJ") denial of Petitioner’s

application for cancellation of removal. Reviewing the procedural due process

FILED

NOV 18 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

claim de novo, Hamazaspyan v. Holder, 590 F.3d 744, 747 (9th Cir. 2009), we

grant the petition.

We have jurisdiction over colorable constitutional claims alleging a violation

of procedural due process. Mendez-Castro v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 975, 978 (9th

Cir. 2009). The government’s argument that we lack jurisdiction over claims

alleging substantive due process violations is, therefore, inapposite.

The IJ permitted cross-examination of Petitioner before direct examination,

disregarded evidence, prejudged issues, cut off relevant testimony, and failed to

discuss (or, apparently, even to consider) relevant evidence. Considering "the

cumulative effect of the several due process violations," Zolotukhin v. Gonzales,

417 F.3d 1073, 1077 (9th Cir. 2005), we hold that "the challenged proceeding was

so fundamentally unfair that the alien was prevented from reasonably presenting

[her] case," Cruz Rendon v. Holder, 603 F.3d 1104, 1109 (9th Cir. 2010) (internal

quotation marks omitted). Furthermore, the evidence and testimony concerned a

central issue in determining Petitioner’s eligibility for relief, namely, the hardship

that her American-citizen children would suffer; consequently, "the outcome of the

proceeding may have been affected" by the IJ’s actions. Tampubolon v. Holder,

610 F.3d 1056, 1063 (9th Cir. 2010) (internal quotation marks omitted). 

Petition GRANTED; case REMANDED.
AFS-10-331-E Aug 12 2010

Exemption No. 9778A Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2007-28418

Mr. Gregg Stockman

669 Berville Road Allenton, MI 48002

Dear Mr. Stockman:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 9778. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the conditions

and limitations.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated July 3, 2010, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Adm inistration (FAA) for an extension of Exemption No. 9778. That exemption from § 61.31(e) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows you to use certain fixed gear airplanes to provide complex airplane training.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to you.

Our Decision

The FAA has determ ined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 9778 remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the following conditions and limitations.2

Conditions and Limitations

1. This exemption applies only to Mr. Stockman providing flight training or an endorsement under § 61.31(e).

2. This exemption does not apply to flight training pursuant to an airman certificate or rating.

3. The non-complex airplane being used to simulate a complex airplane per Condition No. 5 must have a standard type certificate.

4. The non-complex airplane being used to simulate a complex airplane per Condition No. 5 must be equipped with a controllable pitch propeller and flaps.

5. The non-complex airplane make and model being used to simulate a complex airplane must be equipped with the petitioner’s device (U.S. Patent 6,638,071) in accordance with either the supplemental type certificate process per part 21 or in accordance with the major alteration process per part 43.

6. Persons receiving training under this grant of exemption per Condition No. 1 must also have a notation in their logbook that all or part of the training was conducted using Exemption No. 9778.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the term ination date of Exemption No. 9778 to October 31, 2012 unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 9778 remain the same. This letter must be attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 9778.

Sincerely,

/s/

John M. Allen Director, Flight Standards Service
§ 524.463 Copper naphthenate. ( a ) *Amount.* The drug is a 37.5 percent solution of copper naphthenate.
( b ) *Sponsors.* See Nos. 017135, 054771, and 058829 in § 510.600(c) of this chapter.
( c ) *Conditions of use in horses* — ( 1 ) *Amount.* Apply daily to affected hooves until fully healed.
( 2 ) *Indications for use.* As an aid in treating horses and ponies for thrush caused by organisms susceptible to copper naphthenate.
( 3 ) *Limitations.* Use on horses and ponies only. Avoid contact around eyes. Do not contaminate feed. Do not use in horses intended for human consumption.
[47 FR 4250, Jan. 29, 1982, as amended at 68 FR 55825, Sept. 29, 2003; 71 FR 38074, July 5, 2006; 79 FR 10967, Feb. 27, 2014]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission

# SUMMARY:

                            The Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission (FCIC) announces that it will hold a forum that will bring together experts who have researched the financial crisis. The economists will present working papers to the Commissioners on the key issues and events leading up to the crisis and its underlying causes. The presentations will be followed by discussion with the Commissioners. The forum will also be webcast live at                             *http://www.FCIC.gov.*

# DATES:

The forum will be held on Friday, February 26, 2010, from 1 p.m. to 6 p.m. and Saturday, February 27, 2010, from 8 a.m. to 2:45 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The forum will be held at: American University Washington College of Law, Room 603, 4801 Massachusetts Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20016.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Gretchen Newsom, The Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, 1717 Pennsylvania Avenue, Suite 800, Washington, DC 20006, 202-292-2799; 202-632-1604 fax.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The purpose of the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission is to examine the causes, domestic and global, of the current financial and economic crisis in the United States, per the requirements of the Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act of 2009 (“FERN”), Section 5, Public Law 111-21, 123 Stat. 1617 (2009).

## Public Participation

The meeting is open to the public. The Chairman of the Commission will lead the forum for the orderly conduct of business.

Dated: February 25, 2010.

Gretchen Kinney Newsom,

Certifying Official and Special Assistant to the Chairman, Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission.

[FR Doc. 2010-4218 Filed 2-25-10; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-RK-P
§ 524.2080 Ropinirole. ( a ) *Specifications.* Each milliliter of solution contains 30 milligrams (mg) ropinirole (equivalent to 34.2 mg ropinirole hydrochloride).
( b ) *Sponsor.* See No. 052483 in § 510.600(c) of this chapter.
( c ) *Conditions of use* — ( 1 ) *Amount.* Using the table provided in labeling, administer the number of eye drops topically, corresponding to body weight, that results in a target dose of 3.75 mg per square meter (mg/m2) (dose band 2.7 to 5.4 mg/m2). If the dog does not vomit within 20 minutes of the first dose, then a second dose may be administered.
( 2 ) *Indications for use.* For the induction of vomiting in dogs.
( 3 ) *Limitations.* Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian.
[86 FR 13185, Mar. 8, 2021]
§ 507.14 Personnel. ( a ) The management of the establishment must take reasonable measures and precautions to ensure that all persons working in direct contact with animal food, animal food-contact surfaces, and animal food-packaging materials conform to hygienic practices to the extent necessary to protect against the contamination of animal food.
( b ) The methods for conforming to hygienic practices and maintaining cleanliness include: ( 1 ) Maintaining adequate personal cleanliness;
( 2 ) Washing hands thoroughly in an adequate hand-washing facility as necessary and appropriate to protect against contamination;
( 3 ) Removing or securing jewelry and other objects that might fall into animal food, equipment, or containers;
( 4 ) Storing clothing or other personal belongings in areas other than where animal food is exposed or where equipment or utensils are cleaned; and
( 5 ) Taking any other necessary precautions to protect against the contamination of animal food, animal food-contact surfaces, or animal food-packaging materials.
Order entered May 3, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00278-CV

CITY OF DALLAS, Appellant

V.

MILLWEE-JACKSON JOINT VENTURE, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 04-07287-E

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s April 30, 2013 motion for an extension of time to file a brief. 

Appellant shall file its brief on or before June 12, 2013. We caution appellant that no further 

extension of time will be granted in this accelerated appeal absent extraordinary circumstances.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 88 (Friday, May 7, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 25119]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-10757]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Acquisition Regulations System

48 CFR Part 252

Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Technical 
Amendment

AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense 
(DoD).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: DoD is issuing a technical amendment to the Defense Federal 
Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to correct a reference to a 
paragraph in a FAR clause.

DATES: Effective Date: May 7, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Ynette R. Shelkin, Defense 
Acquisition Regulations System, OUSD (AT&L) DPAP (DARS), Room 3B855, 
3060 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3060. Telephone 703-602-
8384; facsimile 703-602-0350.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final rule amends DFARS text at 
252.204-7007, Alternate A, Annual Representations and Certifications, 
by correcting the paragraph reference to FAR 52.204-8 from paragraph 
(c) to paragraph (d).

List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 252

    Government procurement.

Ynette R. Shelkin,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.

0
Therefore DoD is amending 48 CFR part 252 as follows:
0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR part 252 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority:  41 U.S.C. 421 and 48 CFR chapter 1.

PART 252--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES

252.204-7007   [Amended]

0
2. Amend section 252.204-7007 by revising the clause date to read 
``(MAY 2010)'' and the paragraph designation in the FAR provision to 
read ``(d)''.

[FR Doc. 2010-10757 Filed 5-6-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-08-P
```
§ 582.7349 Sterculia gum. ( a ) *Product.* Sterculia gum (karaya gum).
( b ) *Conditions of use.* This substance is generally recognized as safe when used in accordance with good manufacturing or feeding practice.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 12-2652

___________________________

Jason Price

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Steve Larkins, Warden, ERDCC, Individually; Larry Short, Functional Unit

Manager, ERDCC, Individually; Unknown Wescott, Sergeant, Correctional

Officer II, ERDCC, Individually; Unknown Miller, Correctional Officer I,

ERDCC, Individually; Unknown Holifield, Correctional Officer I, ERDCC,

Individually; Michelle Williford, Correctional Officer I, ERDCC, Individually

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________

 Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis

____________

 Submitted: January 29, 2013

Filed: February 27, 2013

[Unpublished]

____________

Before BYE, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.
Inmate Jason Price appeals the district court’s adverse grant of summary

1

judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Upon de novo review, see Whitson v. Stone

County Jail, 602 F.3d 920, 923 (8th Cir. 2010), we agree with the district court that

the record does not create a jury issue on whether defendants violated the Eighth

Amendment by failing to avert an attack that Price suffered at the hands of a fellow

inmate, see Young v. Selk, 508 F.3d 868, 871-72 (8th Cir. 2007) (under Eighth

Amendment’s prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment, prison officials must

take reasonable steps to guarantee inmate safety by protecting them from attacks by

other inmates). Because we agree with the court that the record does not establish an

Eighth Amendment violation, we need not address the issue of qualified immunity. 

See Schmidt v. City of Bella Villa, 557 F.3d 564, 574 (8th Cir. 2009). The judgment

of the district court is affirmed.

______________________________

The Honorable Audrey G. Fleissig, United States District Judge for the

1

Eastern District of Missouri.

-2-