alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





|In connection with the annual report of Naturewell, Incorporated (the "Registrant") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") the undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|Dated:  October 20, 2008
EXHIBIT 21



SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



Parent



The Southern Banc Company, Inc.



|                          |  |                                              |  |                     
|------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------
|Subsidiaries (1)          |  | State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation |  | Percentage Ownership
|The Southern Bank Company |  | United States                                |  | 100%                
|First Service Corporation |  | Alabama                                      |  | 100%                

---

|(1) | The assets, liabilities and operations of the subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial statements attached hereto as an exhibit.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
§ 640.22 Collection of source material. ( a ) Whole blood used as the source of Platelets shall be collected as prescribed in § 640.4.
( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) If plateletpheresis is used, the procedure for collection must be as prescribed in §§ 640.21, 640.64 (except paragraph (c)), and 640.65, or as described in an approved biologics license application (BLA) or an approved supplement to a BLA.
( d ) The phlebotomy shall be performed by a single uninterrupted venipuncture with minimal damage to, and minimal manipulation of, the donor's tissue.
[40 FR 4304, Jan. 29, 1975, as amended at 45 FR 27927, Apr. 25, 1980; 49 FR 23834, June 8, 1984; 50 FR 4139, Jan. 29, 1985; 55 FR 11013, Mar. 26, 1990; 59 FR 49351, Sept. 28, 1994; 64 FR 45372, Aug. 19, 1999; 64 FR 56453, Oct. 20, 1999; 72 FR 45887, Aug. 16, 2007; 80 FR 29904, May 22, 2015]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAdvanced Modular Power System Electronics Enclosure Thermal TestingAn analysis was set up to model the temperature of the advanced modular power system (AMPS) power distribution cards when installed within the electronics enclosure case. The analysis was used to determine the steady-state temperature distribution of the cards within the case. To verify the analysis, an experiment was set up and conducted to simulate the operation of the cards within the enclosure. Four tests were conducted. The tests varied the position of the cold plate and evaluated the use of a thermal compound to reduce the contact resistance between the joints within the thermal path between the cards and the cold plate. Three of the four cases examined showed very good agreement between the analysis and the experiment with a less than 1-percent variation in the predicated temperatures determined through the analysis and the experimentally derived temperatures. In the remaining case, the difference between the analysis and experiment was approximately 12 percent. Both the experiment and analysis showed that the modular power conditioning cards can be maintained within their desired maximum operating temperature range of 40 to 45 °C through thermal conduction to a cold plate when operating with their estimated maximum heat output of 16 W per card.Document ID20190025222Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsColozza, Anthony J.*(Vantage Partners, LLC Brook Park, OH, United States)*Gardner, Brent G.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredMay 20, 2019Publication DateMay 1, 2019Subject CategoryElectronics And Electrical EngineeringReport/Patent NumberGRC-E-DAA-TN61712NASA/TM-2019-220011Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NNC12BA01BWBS: 291647.04.01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20190025222.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7676 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7676

    To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit officers and 
  employees of the judiciary from engaging in official acts affecting 
                     personal financial interests.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 13, 2024

Mr. Schiff (for himself, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, Ms. Norton, Ms. Lee of 
California, Mr. Goldman of New York, Mr. Jackson of Illinois, and Mrs. 
   Ramirez) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit officers and 
  employees of the judiciary from engaging in official acts affecting 
                     personal financial interests.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Judicial Integrity Act''.

SEC. 2. ACTS AFFECTING A PERSONAL FINANCIAL INTEREST.

    (a) Judicial Conflicts of Interest.--Section 208(a) of title 18, 
United States Code, is amended by inserting after ``of the United 
States Government,'' the following: ``or of the judicial branch of the 
United States Government, including a Federal judge or a justice of the 
Supreme Court of the United States,''.
    (b) Regulatory Waiver.--Section 208(b) of title 18, United States 
Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (3), by striking ``or'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (4), by striking ``parties.'' and 
        inserting ``parties; or'' ; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(5) if, by regulation issued by the Judicial Conference 
        of the United States applicable to all judicial officers and 
        employees covered by this section, with public notice and 
        comment, the financial interest has been exempted from the 
        requirements of subsection (a) as being too remote or too 
        inconsequential to affect the integrity of the services of the 
        Government officers or employees to which such regulation 
        applies.''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Fayaz D. Suleman, certify that: 

1. I havereviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Vitran Corporation Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to bedesigned under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the Audit Committee of the registrant’s Board of Directors:

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: October 6, 2011
# C_2014421EN.01001803.xml

| 24.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 421/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 421/18

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail de Bruxelles (Belgium) lodged on 28 August 2014 — Aliny Wojciechowski v Office national des pensions (ONP)

(Case C-408/14)

2014/C 421/27

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal du travail de Bruxelles

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Aliny Wojciechowski

Applicant:

Defendant: Office national des pensions (ONP)

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

On a proper construction of the principle of sincere cooperation and Article 4(3) TEU, on the one hand, and of Article 34(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, on the other, is a Member State precluded from reducing or refusing a retirement pension payable to an employed person by virtue of the service performed, in accordance with the legislation of that Member State, where the total number of years worked in that Member State and within the European institutions exceeds the ‘occupational record unit’ of 45 years referred to in Article 10(a) of Royal Decree No 50 of 24 October 1967 on the retirement and survival pension of employed persons?

---
# C_2015007EN.01005101.xml

| 12.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/51

---

Action brought on 6 October 2014 — ZZ v OHIM

(Case F-102/14)

(2015/C 007/61)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: Heinrich Tettenborn)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM)

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of OHIM to apply the clause contained in the applicant’s contract of employment — which provides for a termination of the applicant’s contract of employment in the event that the applicant is not placed on the reserve list of the next general selection procedure organised by EPSO for its functional group and specialising in industrial property — to selection procedures OHIM/AD/01/13 and OHIM/AST/02/13, and a claim for damages for the non-material damage arising from that decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | set aside the decision of OHIM, which was communicated to the applicant by letter from OHIM dated 28 November 2003, to apply the clause contained in Article 5 of the applicant’s contract of employment — which provides for a termination of the applicant’s contract of employment in the event that the applicant is not placed on the reserve list of the next general selection procedure organised by EPSO for its functional group and specialising in industrial property — to selection procedures OHIM/AD/01/13 and OHIM/AST/02/13, which were published on 31 October 2013; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the decision of OHIM, which was communicated to the applicant by letter from OHIM dated 28 November 2003, to apply the clause contained in Article 5 of the applicant’s contract of employment — which provides for a termination of the applicant’s contract of employment in the event that the applicant is not placed on the reserve list of the next general selection procedure organised by EPSO for its functional group and specialising in industrial property — to selection procedures OHIM/AD/01/13 and OHIM/AST/02/13, which were published on 31 October 2013;

| — | order OHIM to pay to the applicant damages of an appropriate amount at the discretion of the Court for the non-material damage arising from the decision of OHIM referred to in paragraph 1 above; and |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay to the applicant damages of an appropriate amount at the discretion of the Court for the non-material damage arising from the decision of OHIM referred to in paragraph 1 above; and

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

---
| Grantee:                  |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| Address:                  |   |
|                      |   |
| Number of Awarded Shares: |   |
| Grant Date:               |   |

| Vesting of Awarded Shares: | Date   | Aggregate Vested Shares | Vested % |
|----------------------------|--------|-------------------------|----------|
|                       |   |                    | 25%      |
|                       |   |                    | 50%      |
|                       |   |                    | 75%      |
|   Total:              |   |                    | 100%     |

----

----

----

----

----

|   | CEC Entertainment, Inc.           |                                                     |
|--------|-----------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                              |                                                     |   |
|   | By:      |                                                     |   |
|   | Name:                        |                                                     |   |
|   | Title:                            |                                                     |   |
|   | Address:                          | 4441 W. Airport Frwy       |   |
|   |                              |  Irving, TX 75062                                   |   |

----
#### § 520.38 Albendazole oral dosage forms.
§ 70.42 Criteria for evaluating the safety of color additives. ( a ) In deciding whether a petition is complete and suitable for filing and in reaching a decision on any petition filed, the Commissioner will apply the “safe-for-use” principle. This will require the presentation of all needed scientific data in support of a proposed listing to assure that each listed color additive will be safe for its intended use or uses in or on food, drugs, or cosmetics. The Commissioner may list a color additive for use generally in or on food, in or on drugs, or in or on cosmetics when he finds from the data presented that such additive is suitable and may safely be employed for such general use; he may list an additive only for more limited use or uses for which it is proven suitable and may safely be employed; and he is authorized to prescribe broadly the conditions under which the additive may be safely employed for such use or uses. This may allow the use of a particular dye, pigment, or other substance with certain diluents, but not with others, or at a higher concentration with some than with others.
( b ) The safety for external color additives will normally be determined by tests for acute oral toxicity, primary irritation, sensitization, subacute dermal toxicity on intact and abraded skin, and carcinogenicity by skin application. The Commissioner may waive any of such tests if data before him otherwise establish that such test is not required to determine safety for the use proposed.
( c ) Upon written request describing the proposed use of a color additive and the proposed experiments to determine its safety, the Commissioner will advise a person who wishes to establish the safety of a color additive whether he believes the experiments planned will yield data adequate for an evaluation of the safety of the additive.
#### Rosie S. Williams *v.*Commission on Civil Rights *of*the State of Connecticut et al.

King, C. J., Alcorn, House, Thim and Ryan, Js.

Argued November 12

decided November 13, 1969

*William I. Mark,*for the appellant (plaintiff).

*Robert L. Hirtle, Jr.,*assistant attorney general, with whom, on the brief, were *Robert K. Killian,.*attorney general, and *F. Michael Ahern,*assistant attorney general, for the appellee (named defendant).

*John D. Fassett,*for the appellee (defendant General Motors Corporation).

Per Curiam.

It is clear from the record that the trial court, assuming that it had jurisdiction of the subject matter, reached a correct decision on the merits. Even if the court were in error in holding that it had jurisdiction of the subject matter, that error could not have harmed the plaintiff.

There is no error.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 38 (Friday, February 26, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 8990]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4026]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLCON03400 L1711 AL]


Notice of Public Meeting, Northwest Colorado Resource Advisory 
Council Subgroup for McInnis Canyons National Conservation Area

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
(FLPMA) and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), the U.S. 
Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Northwest 
Colorado Resource Advisory Council (RAC) McInnis Canyons National 
Conservation Area (MCNCA) Subgroup will meet in March 2010.

DATES: A MCNCA Subgroup meeting will be held March 4, 2010.

ADDRESSES: The Northwest Colorado RAC McInnis Canyons National 
Conservation Area Subgroup meeting will be held March 4, 2010, at the 
Bureau of Land Management Grand Junction Field Office at 2815 H Road, 
Grand Junction, CO 81506.
    The meeting will begin at 5 p.m. and adjourn at approximately 7 
p.m. A public comment period regarding matters on the agenda will be at 
5:30 p.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Katie Stevens, McInnis Canyons 
National Conservation Area Manager, 2815 H Road, Grand Junction, CO; 
telephone 970-244-3049; or Erin Curtis, Public Affairs Specialist, 2815 
H Road, Grand Junction, CO, telephone 970-244-3097.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Subgroup provides counsel and advice to 
the full Northwest Resource Advisory Council, who in turn provides 
counsel and advice to the Secretary of the Interior, through the BLM, 
concerning implementation of a management plan developed in accordance 
with FLPMA, for public lands within the MCNCA. Agenda items will 
include an update on river permit/fee options and an update on Front 
Country trail planning.
    The meeting is open to the public and includes a time set aside for 
public comment. Interested persons may make oral statements at the 
meeting or submit written statements at any meeting. Per-person time 
limits for oral statements may be set to allow all interested persons 
an opportunity to speak.
    Summary minutes of all Subgroup meetings will be maintained at the 
Grand Junction Field Office. They are available for public inspection 
and reproduction during regular business hours within thirty (30) days 
of the meeting. In addition, minutes and other information concerning 
the Subgroup can be obtained from the MCNCA planning Web site at: 
http://www.blm.gov/co/st/en/nca/mcnca/mcncaplan/cocanplan_adv.html 
which will be updated following each Subgroup meeting.

Helen M. Hankins,
Colorado State Director.
[FR Doc. 2010-4026 Filed 2-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P