alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.02
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT of 2002

I, DAVID K. GRIFFITHS, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003 of
Amerityre Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:
 (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: September 26, 2003


/S/David K. Griffiths
David K. Griffiths
Secretary/Treasurer
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 00-2803

___________

Phyllis M. Burns, *

*

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Western

v. * District of Missouri.

*

Larry G. Massanari, Acting * [UNPUBLISHED]

Commissioner of Social Security, *

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: June 7, 2001

Filed: June 12, 2001

___________

Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and FAGG,

Circuit Judge.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Phyllis M. Burns appeals the district court's order affirming the Commissioner's

decision to deny Burns's applications for supplemental security income and disability

insurance benefits. We affirm.

We conclude the administrative law judge (ALJ) correctly evaluated the severity

of Burns's depression and associated functional limitations. Burns did not allege

disabling depression in her applications; and although she was treated for depression,
-2-

took prescription and antidepressants, and attended counseling, no treating physician

indicated her depression was disabling, her therapist opined her depression was

somewhat situational in nature, and a consultative neuropsychiatrist found no specific

abnormalities other than a mildly depressed mood. See Dunahoo v. Apfel, 241 F.3d

1033, 1039 (8th Cir. 2001) (failure to allege disabling mental impairment in application

is significant, even if evidence of depression was later developed); cf. Qualls v. Apfel,

158 F.3d 425, 428 (8th Cir. 1998) (ALJ need not adopt treating physician's opinion on

ultimate issue of disability). The ALJ also followed the proper procedure for evaluating

Burns's mental impairment, see 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1520a, 416.920a (2000), and the

ALJ's findings are supported by the record, see Rose v. Apfel, 181 F.3d 943, 944-45

(8th Cir. 1999) (although claimant received outpatient psychiatric treatment and was

diagnosed as having depression, depression was not disabling because there was no

evidence of problems with concentration, persistence, or pace, of deterioration in work

situation, or of related limitation of daily activities).

We also conclude the ALJ made sufficient findings about the physical and mental

demands of Burns's past relevant sedentary work as a telemarketer. Burns testified she

could stand for 10 to 15 minutes and could work some; her medical records noted no

limitations on either of these activities; and, based on her vocational report, a telephone

operator did not need to lift. See 20 C.F.R. § 404.1567(a) (2000) (sedentary work

requirements). The ALJ properly considered the mental demands of Burns's past work

by referring to the job description for telephone solicitor in the Dictionary of

Occupational Titles, see Pfitzner v. Apfel, 169 F.3d 566, 569 (8th Cir. 1999), and by

determining her mental limitations did not affect her ability to work, see Rose, 181 F.3d

at 945.

Accordingly, we find substantial evidence supports the ALJ's findings, see

Cunningham v. Apfel, 222 F.3d 496, 500 (8th Cir. 2000) (standard of review), and

affirm.
-3-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
```

[Federal Register: January 20, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 12)]
[Notices]               
[Page 3272]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr20ja10-113]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6876]

 
Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``The Sacred Made Real: Spanish Painting and Sculpture 
1600-1700''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 
of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of 
April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``The Sacred Made Real: Spanish Painting and 
Sculpture 1600-1700,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition 
within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are 
imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or 
custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the 
exhibit objects at the National Gallery of Art, Washington, DC, from on 
or about February 28, 2010, until on or about May 31, 2010, and at 
possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in 
the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: January 12, 2010.
Maura M. Pally,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-986 Filed 1-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
# L_2019242EN.01002701.xml

| 20.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 242/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 242/27

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2019/1573

of 16 September 2019

appointing an alternate member, proposed by the Kingdom of Sweden, of the Committee of the Regions

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Swedish Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 26 January 2015, 5 February 2015 and 23 June 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU) 2015/116 (1), (EU) 2015/190 (2) and (EU) 2015/994 (3) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 26 January 2015, 5 February 2015 and 23 June 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU) 2015/116 (1), (EU) 2015/190 (2) and (EU) 2015/994 (3) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020.

| (2) | An alternate member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Carl Johan SONESSON, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

An alternate member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Carl Johan SONESSON,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is hereby appointed as an alternate member of the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2020:

| — | Mr Lars-Ingvar LJUNGMAN, Ledamot i kommunfullmäktige, Vellinge kommun. |
| --- | --- |

—

Mr Lars-Ingvar LJUNGMAN, Ledamot i kommunfullmäktige, Vellinge kommun.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 16 September 2019.

For the Council

The President

T. TUPPURAINEN

---

(1)  Council Decision (EU) 2015/116 of 26 January 2015 appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020 (OJ L 20, 27.1.2015, p. 42).

1

(2)  Council Decision (EU) 2015/190 of 5 February 2015 appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020 (OJ L 31, 7.2.2015, p. 25).

2

(3)  Council Decision (EU) 2015/994 of 23 June 2015 appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020 (OJ L 159, 25.6.2015, p. 70).

3

---
§ 358.720 Permitted combinations of active ingredients. ( a ) *Combination of active ingredients for the control of dandruff.* Salicylic acid identified in § 358.710(a)(4) may be combined with sulfur identified in § 358.710(a)(7) provided each ingredient is present within the established concentration and the product is labeled according to § 358.750.
( b ) *Combination of control of dandruff and external analgesic active ingredients.* Coal tar identified in § 358.710(a)(1) may be used at a concentration of 1.8 percent coal tar solution, on a weight to volume basis, in combination with menthol, 1.5 percent, in a shampoo formulation provided the product is labeled according to § 358.760.
[72 FR 9852, Mar. 6, 2007]
§ 520.1454 Moxidectin solution. ( a ) *Specifications.* Each milliliter (mL) of solution contains 1 milligram (mg) moxidectin.
( b ) *Sponsor.* See No. 058198 in § 510.600(c) of this chapter.
( c ) *Related tolerances.* See § 556.426 of this chapter.
( d ) *Special considerations.* See § 500.25 of this chapter.
( e ) *Conditions of use in sheep* — ( 1 ) *Amount.* Administer 1 mL per 11 pounds body weight (1 mL per 5 kilograms) by mouth.
( 2 ) *Indications for use.* For the treatment and control of the adult and L4 larval stages of *Haemonchus contortus*, *Teladorsagia circumcincta*, *T. trifurcata*, *Trichostrongylus axei*, *T. colubriformis*, *T. vitrinus*, *Cooperia curticei*, *C. oncophora*, *Oesophagostomum columbianum*, *O. venulosum*, *Nematodirus battus*, *N. filicollis*, and *N. spathiger.*
( 3 ) *Limitations.* Sheep must not be slaughtered for human consumption within 7 days of treatment. Because a withholding time in milk has not been established for this product, do not use in female sheep providing milk for human consumption.
[70 FR 76163, Dec. 23, 2005, as amended at 76 FR 48714, Aug. 9, 2011; 82 FR 21690, May 10, 2017; 86 FR 14818, Mar. 19, 2021]
February 14, 2011

Via Email

Gerardo Rios (Air

- 3) U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Region IX

75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105

- 3901

Re: Docket Number: EPA

- R09

- OAR

- 2010

- 1078 ; Revision to the South Coast Portion of the California State Implementation Plan, CPV Sentinel Energy Project AB 1318 Tracking System

Dear Mr. Rios:

On behalf of the Natural Resources Defense Council, we submit these comments on the

above

- referenced proposed revision to the State Implementation Plan (“SIP” ) for California. As EPA is intimately aware, the use and creation of credits to demonstrate compliance with the

Clean Air Act ’s New Source Review provisions are vital to ensuring expeditious progress

towards attainment

. As regions throughout the state seek to comply with the Clean Air Act’s mandate to meet federal clean air standards on time, we remain concerned about any efforts that erode pro gress in the nation’s most polluted air sheds. We also remain concerned about proposals that set poor precedents for air quality planning. With this in mind, NRDC views the creation of credits from prior air pollut ion gains as precisely the type of action s that concern our organization and our tens of thousands of members in California.

In sum, this proposed rule m oving forward now poses c oncerns about these questionable

credits prior to EPA’s action on Rule 1315. P lease do not hesitate to call us at (310) 434

- 2300

.

Sincerely,

David Pettit Senior Attorney Adriano L. Martinez Project Attorney
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 958 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 958

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         July 28, 2006.
    Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII for a two-thirds 
vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the same day it is 
presented to the House is waived with respect to any resolution reported on the 
legislative day of July 28, 2006, providing for consideration or disposition of 
any of the following measures:
            (1) A conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 2830) to amend 
        the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and the Internal 
        Revenue Code of 1986 to reform the pension funding rules, and for other 
        purposes.
            (2) A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 
        the unified credit against the estate tax to an exclusion equivalent of 
        $5,000,000, to repeal the sunset provision for the estate and 
        generation-skipping taxes, and to extend expiring provisions, and for 
        other purposes.
            (3) A bill to provide economic security for all Americans, and for 
        other purposes.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6768

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CLARENCE BERNARD GRAY, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Sr., District Judge. (CR-94-241, CA-97-453-2) Submitted: October 8, 1998 Decided: November 30, 1998 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Clarence Bernard Gray, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Blue Boggs, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Clarence Bernard Gray seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Gray , No. CR-94-241; CA-97-453-2 (M.D.N.C. May 8, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 524.1600a Nystatin, neomycin, thiostrepton, and triamcinolone ointment. ( a ) *Specifications.* Each milliliter of petrolatum base or each gram of vanishing cream base ointment contains: 100,000 units of nystatin; neomycin sulfate equivalent to 2.5 milligrams of neomycin base; 2,500 units of thiostrepton; and 1.0 milligram of triamcinolone acetonide.
( b ) *Sponsors.* See sponsors in § 510.600(c) of this chapter: ( 1 ) For petrolatum base ointments: Nos. 025463 and 054771; or
( 2 ) For vanishing cream base ointments: Nos. 025463 and 054771.
( c ) *Conditions of use* — ( 1 ) *Amount.* ( i ) For topical dermatological use: Clean affected areas and remove any encrusted discharge or exudate, and apply sparingly either ointment in a thin film.
( ii ) For otic use: Clean ear canal of impacted cerumen, remove any foreign bodies such as grass awns and ticks, and instill three to five drops of petrolatum base ointment. Preliminary use of a local anesthetic may be advisable.
( iii ) For infected anal glands and cystic areas: Drain gland or cyst and fill with petrolatum base ointment.
( 2 ) *Indications for use.* ( i ) Topically: Use either ointment in dogs and cats for anti-inflammatory, antipruritic, antifungal, and antibacterial treatment of superficial bacterial infections, and for dermatologic disorders characterized by inflammation and dry or exudative dermatitis, particularly associated with bacterial or candidal (*Candida albicans*) infections.
( ii ) Otitis, cysts, and anal gland infections: Use petrolatum base ointment in dogs and cats for the treatment of acute and chronic otitis and interdigital cysts, and in dogs for anal gland infections.
( 3 ) *Limitations.* Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian.
[40 FR 13873, Mar. 27, 1975, as amended at 43 FR 29770, July 11, 1978; 50 FR 41490, Oct. 11, 1985; 53 FR 39257, Oct. 6, 1988; 54 FR 5431, Feb. 3, 1989; 54 FR 48090, Nov. 21, 1989; 56 FR 50653, Oct. 8, 1991; 60 FR 55660, Nov. 2, 1995; 61 FR 63712, Dec. 2, 1996; 64 FR 42831, Aug. 6, 1999; 67 FR 67521, Nov. 6, 2002; 68 FR 55201, Sept. 23, 2003; 70 FR 50183, Aug. 26, 2005; 71 FR 13542, Mar. 16, 2006; 79 FR 10972, Feb. 27, 2014; 88 FR 84701, Dec. 6, 2023]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. EARNEST DUKES, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 218 EAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 20th day of August, 2014, the Petition for All owance of Appeal is DENIED
.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8), pertaining to the GenQuest 1996 Stock Option Plan, of Corixa Corporation
of our report dated January 28, 1998 with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Corixa Corporation included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 1997, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.

                                                              Ernst & Young LLP
Seattle, Washington
November 6, 1998
### The HONORABLE STEPHEN M. REASONER, Chief Judge , United States 1 

### Distri ct Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, sitting b y designation. The Honorable David S. Doty, United States Dis trict Judge for 2 

### the District of Minnesota.



# United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 96-3500

___________ St. Paul Fire and Marine * Insurance Company, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Pharmacists Mutual Insurance * [UNPUBLISHED] Company, an Iowa corporation, * * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: March 13, 1997 Filed: April 3, 1997

___________ Before WOLLMAN and BEAM, Circuit Judges, and REASONER, District 1 Judge.

___________ PER CURIAM. This is a n appeal from the summary judgment entered by the district court dismissing St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company’s clai m

2 against Pharmacists Mutual Insurance Company for contribution to a settlement.

### -2- Having considered the arguments and briefs of the parties and having concluded than an extended opinion would have no precedential value in thi s diversity case, we affirm the judgment on the basis of the district court’ s thorough, well-reasoned memorandum opinion. See 8th Cir. Rule 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
###### Editorial Note on Part 175

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 175 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; and 70 FR 72074, Dec. 1, 2005.

#### § 175.230 Hot-melt strippable food coatings.

Hot-melt strippable food coatings may be safely applied to food, subject to the provisions of this section.

(a) The coatings are applied to and used as removable coatings for food.

(b) The coatings may be prepared, as mixtures, from the following substances:

(1) Substances generally recognized as safe in food.

(2) Substances identified in this subparagraph.

| List of substances | Limitations |
| --- | --- |
| Acetylated monoglycerides | Complying with 172.828 of this chapter. |
| Cellulose acetate butyrate | |
| Cellulose acetate propionate | |
| Mineral oil, white | For use only as a component of hot-melt strippable food coatings applied to frozen meats and complying with § 172.878 of this chapter. |
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Mackie Designs Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James T. Engen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|Dated: April 15, 2003 |  | By: | /s/JAMES T. ENGENJames T. Engen President and Chief Executive
Officer
|--------------------- |  | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks