ENTEC Serv 

Pollution Control System Evaluation and Source Emissions Testing 

Boral Brick 

Smyrna, Georgia 

Compliance Emissions Testing 

Kiln No. 2 DIFF Inlet / Outlet 

February 15, 2007 

Entec Project No." 27127 

16-D Commerce Avenue Hueytown, Alabama 35023 Phone: (205) 491-6676 Fax (205) 491-6614 

www.entecservices.com 
Entec Services, Inc. 

16 D Commerce Avenue 

Hueytown, Alabama 35023 

Telephone: (205) 491-6676 

Fax: (205) 491-6614 

Results of the February 15, 2007 

Compliance Emissions Testing on Kiln No. 2 DIFF System 

inlet / Outlet Stack at the 

Boral Brick Facility in 

Smyrna, Georgia 

Submitted to: 

Boral Brick 

P.O. Box 1178 

Columbus, Georgia 31902 

Attention: Mr. Frank Porter 

Entec Project No. 27127 

Completed By: 

Art Otero 

Proiect keader 

Report Submitted: March 7, 2007 

Reviewed By: 

Tom Lotz 

Technical Services Manager 

hereby certify to the best ofmy knowledge all field sampling and laboratory analysis performed for 

this report is authentic and accurate. It has been checked for completeness and accuracy. 
Boral Brick 

Table of Contents 

Section 

Executive Summary 

Emissions Summary 

Detailed Test Results 

Sampling Procedures 

Location of Test Ports 

Method 26A Sampling Train 

Field Data Sheets 

Main Stack with DIFF 

Test Run No. 1 

Test Run No. 2 

Test Run No. 3 

Test Run No. 4 

Inlet to Scrubber 

Test Run No. 1 

Test Run No. 2 

Test Run No. 3 

Test Run No. 4 

Control Room Data 

Quality Control / Quality Assurance Procedures 

QA/QC Checklist 

Orifice and Temperature Check 

Fyrite Standardization 

Copy of Test Protocol 

Laboratory Analysis 

Particulate and Flow Equipment Calibrations 

Nomenclature and Test Calculations 

Pa_qe No. 

1 

2 

4 

11 

15 

17 

18 

19 

19 

23 

27 

31 

35 

36 

39 

42 

45 

48 

53 

58 

59 

60 

68 

73 

88 

99 
Executive Surnmar 

Boral Brick, located in Smyrna, Georgia was retained Entec Services, inc. to perform 

emissions testing on the Kiln DIFF system (inlet duct and exhaust stack). Mr. Ryan 

Harris, Mr. Joseph Lotz, Mr. Art Otero, and Mr. Bill Phillips, of Entec Services, Inc. 

conducted the testing on February 15, 2007. Representing Boral Brick was Mr. Frank 

Porter who coordinated testing with the control room production activity. 

At the end of Run No. 2 there was a leak check problem with the exhaust stack test. We 

voided both the inlet and outlet test and performed an additional test. Data from the 

voided Run No. 2-is included but was not sent to the laboratory for analysis. No other 

difficulties were encountered in the field collection or in the laboratory analysis of the 

samples by Entec Services, Inc p.ersonnel. 

The emissions test summary on the following page gives a detailed summary of each 

test run compared to the maximum emission limits set forth by the Georgia Department 

of Natural Resources. Tests results indicate that the emissions results are below 

the emission standards set forth by the MACT standard for all parameters except 

Hydrogen Fluoride. 


D eta l e d Test Res u Its 
Entec Services, Inc. 

SOURCE OVERVIEW 

SOURCE OWNER: Boral Brick 

PLANT LOCATION: 

SOURCE(S) NAME(S): 

SOURCE(S) CONDITION: 

Smyrna, GA 

No. 2 Main Baghouse Stack 

MACT Performance Re-Test 

SOURCE(S) SHAPE: Circular 

PROBE WASH CHEMICAL: Acetone 

TEST PERFORMED: 

ADDITIONAL TEST REQUIREMENTS: 

Particulate and HCI/HF Testing 

Minimum 31.8 dscf 

REFERENCE METHOD TESTS: Sample Location 

Volumetric Flow 

Molecular Weight 

Moisture Content 

Particulate 

Visible Emissions 

HCI and HF 

EPA Method 

EPA Method 

EPA Method 

EPA Method 

EPA Method 

EPA Method 

EPA Method 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

9 

26A 

PROJECT MANAGER 

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYST ASSISTANT 

Mr. Lynn Beane 

Mr. Joseph Lotz 

ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST VE READERS Mr. Art Otero 

OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE: Mr. Frank Porter 

RULING AGENCY 

RULING AGENCY REPRESENTATIVE: 

Georgia Department of Natural Resources 

Mr. Daniel McCain 

)ATES TESTS CONDUCTED: 02/15/07 

ENTEC PROJECT NUMBER: 27127 

5 
ENTEC Services, Inc. 

16-D Commerce Ave. Hueytown, Alabama 35023 

INPUT TEST DATA 

Client: Boral Brick 

Source: No. 2 Main Baghouse Stack 

Field Data Symbol 

Run Number 

Test Date 

Time Test Run Began Ended 

Sampling Time 

Stack Area 

Barometric Pressure 

Stack Static Pressure 

Pitot Tube Correction factor 

Meter Correction Factor 

Meter Delta H @ 

Nozzle Diameter 

Meter Volume 

Meter Temperature 

Avg. Orifice Delta H 

Impingers Weight Gain (Moisture) 

Silica Gel Impinger Weight Gain (Moisture) 

Oxygen Concentration, dry basis 

Carbon Dioxide Concentration, dry basis 

Avg. Sq. Rt. of Delta P 

Stack Temperature 

Total Hydrogen Chloride collected, mg 

Total Hydrogen Fluoride collected, mg 

Total particulate collected 

As 

eg 

C. 

Y 

Dn 

Vm 

Wlmp 

C02 

(sqrt 

t, 

HCL 

HF 

mn 

Units 

Military Time 

minutes 

F£ 

in. Hg 

in. H20 

in. H=0 

inches 

dcf 

F 

in. H20 

grams 

grams 

(in. Hi0) 

F 

mg 

mg 

mg 

02/15/07 

0841-0951 

64 

23.579 

29.20 

-0.13 

0.84 

0.995 

1.864 

0.430 

50.324 

37.6 

2.11 

80.4 

9.3 

20.5 

0.0 

0.312 

351.6 

3.024 

42.674 

2.8 

Job NO. 

Data Input By: 

02/15/07 

1052-1205 

64 

23.579 

29.20 

-0.08 

0.84 

0.995 

1.864 

0.430 

37.871 

46.1 

1.15 

45.1 

6.1 

20.5 

0.0 

27127 

Art Otero 

Test Data 

02/15/07 

1300-1410 

64 

23.579 

29.20 

-0.13 

0.84 

0.995 

1.864 

0.430 

59.454 

46.2 

2.95 

75.5 

9.0 

20.5 

0.0 

0.229 0.368 

351.8 348.5 

2.609 

36.711 

3.2 

02/15/07 

1445-1551 

64 

23.579 

29.20 

-0.18 

0.84 

0.995 

1.864 

0.430 

61.008 

57.6 

3.07 

85.6 

19.8 

20.5 

0.0 

0.376 

347.4 

3.469 

43.450 

1.6 

AVERAGE 

64 

29.20 

-0.15 

0.84 

0.995 

1.864 

0.430 

56.929 

47.1 

2.71 

80.5 

12.7 

20.5 

0.0 

0.352 

349.2 

3.034 

40.945 

2.5 
ENTEC Services, •nco 

16-D Commerce Ave Hue',/town, Alabama 35023 

CALCULATED TEST DATA 

Client: Boral Brick Job No. 27127 

Source: No. 2 Main Baghouse Stack Data Inbut By: Art Otero 

Descril•tion Formulas 

Run Number 

Test Date 

Time Began-Ended 

1. Stack Pressure P•r P= 

2. Meter Pressure Pb=r 

3. Standard Meter Volume 17.64" (Vm/Tm) (Pb=r +.•H 113.6) 

4a. Standard Volume of Water Vapor Condensed =o.o•.70s*w.m. 

4b. Standard Volume of Water Collected in Silica Gel =0.04716"w• 

5. Moisture Fraction 

9. Molecular Weight Of Stack Gas, dry basis 0.32"(02)÷ 0.44*(coz)÷o,28"(loo-(oz)-(co•)) 

10. Molecular Weight Of Stack Gas, wet basis Ma'(1.B•)+18.0*(B•) 

'11. Average Stack Gas Velocity 

12. Stack Gas Flow @ Stack Conditions vs'A, 

13. Stack Gas Flow @ Standard Conditions Qo°(Tscd/Ts)* (P•IP•¢•) 

14. Stack Gas Flow @ Dry Standard Conditions 

14b. Hydrogen Chlodde concentration @ Std.Cond.,Grains/Cu.Ft. =(0.01543"HCLmo)/Qst 

Symbol Units Calculated Data 

2 4 AVERAGE 

02/15/07 02/15/07 02/15/07 02/15/07 

ar't 084%0951 1052-1205 1300-1410 1445-1551 

P• Hg 29.19 29.19 29.19 29.19 29.19 

P• Hg 29.36 29.28 29.42 29.43 29.40 

V.•t= 52.105 38.465 60.644 60.880 57.876 

V•(,•o• 3.784 2.122 3.553 4.028 3.788 

vw,•,•o• 0.438 0.288 0.424 0.934 0.599 

B• 0.0750 0.0590 0.0615 0,0754 0.0706 

Mo gig-mole 28.820 28.820 28.820 28,820 28.820 

g/g-mole 28.009 28.182 28.154 28.005 28.056 

22.31 16,32 26.24 28.86 25.14 

Qa 31,557 23,091 37,127 37.995 35,560 

Q• 20,021 14,648 23,646 24,229 22,632 

Q• 18,520 13,784 22,190 22,403 21,038 

•lrldscf 8.96E-04 0.00E+00 6.64E-04 8.79E-04 8.13E-04 

14b. Hydrogen Fluoride concentration @ Std.Cond.,Grains/Cu.Ft. gr/dscf 1.26E-02 0.00E+00 9.34E-03 1.10E-02 1,10E-02 

15. Particulate concentration @ Standard Conditions =0.01543*mnN,•sle gr/dscf 0.0008 0.0000 0.0008 0.0004 0.0007 

15b. Hydrogen Chloride emissions. Ibs per hour =(6O/7O00)*HCLQsv=*QsM 0.14 0.00 0.13 0.17 0.15 

15b. Hydrogen Fluoride emissions, Ibs per hour =(6o/7o0o}* HFQstd° Qstd 2.01 0.00 1.78 2.11 1.97 

21. Particulate emissions (60/-/o0o)'cso Q•= 0.13 0.00 0.15 0,08 0.12 

22. Volume coJJected through nozzle =Ts/Ps'[0.002669*V=c+ Vm*Y'Pr,-JTm] Vo 88.785 64.435 101.466 103.251 97.834 

23. Particulate concentration, @ actual conditions =0.01543*mnN. gr/acf 0.0005 0.0000 0.0005 0.0002 0.0004 

24. Isokinetic Sampling Rate, Percent 100*Vn/(60*vs*An'0) 102.78 101.94 99.84 99.28 100.63 

Post Meter Orifice Cal. (E•C ALT-009 Yqa) 10.998110.9885 1.0062 1.0116 1.0053 

% Difference. (Calibration be within 5% of original Y.factor) -1.03% 

.'7 
Entec Services, Inc. 

SOURCE OVERVIEW 

SOURCE OWNER: 

PLANT LOCATION: 

SOURCE(S) NAME(S): 

SOURCE(S) CONDiTiON: 

SOURCE(S) SHAPE: 

PROBE WASH CHEMICAL: 

TEST PERFORMED: 

ADDITIONAL TEST REQUIREMENTS: 

REFERENCE METHOD TESTS: 

PROJECT MANAGER 

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYST PROJECT LEADER 

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYST ASSISTANT 

OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE: 

RULING AGENCY 

RULING AGENCY REPRESENTATIVE: 

DATES TESTS CONDUCTED: 

ENTEC PROJECT NUMBER: 

Boral Brick 

Smyrna, GA 

Inlet to Scrubber 

MACT Performance Re-Test 

Circular 

Acetone 

HCI/HF Testing 

Minimum 31.8 dscf 

Sample Location 

Volumetric Flow 

Molecular Weight 

Moisture Content 

HCI and HF 

EPA Method 

EPA Method 

EPA Method 

EPA Method 

EPA Method 

Mr. Lynn Beane 

Mr. Ryan Harris 

Mr.Bill Phillips 

Mr. Frank Porter 

Georgia Department of Natural Resources 

Mr. Daniel McCain 

02/15/07 

27127 

1 

2 

3 

4 

26A 
ENTEC Services, inc. 

16-D Commerce Ave. Hueytown. Alabama 35023 

iNPUT TEST DATA 

Client: Boral Brick Job No. 27127 

Source: Inlet to Scrubber Data Input By: Art Otero 

Field Data Units Test Data 

Run Number 

Test Date 

Time Test Run Began Ended 

Sampling Time 

Symbol 

Military Time 

minutes 

02/15/07 

0841-0945 

02/15/07 

1052-1154 

02/15/07 

1300-1405 

02/15/07 

1445-1550 

AVERAGE 

e 60 60 60 60 60 

Stack Area A, Ft' 28.668 28.668 28.668 28.668 

Barometric Pressure P•, in. Hg 29.20 29.20 29.20 29.20 29.20 

Stack Static Pressure Pg in. H20 -0.31 -0.33 -0.31 -0.31 -0.31 

Pitot Tube Correction factor c, 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 

Meter Correction Factor Y 1.015 1.015 1.015 1.015 1.015 

Meter Delta H @ •H@ in. H20 1.724 1.724 1.724 1.724 1.724 

Nozzle Diameter Do inches 0.378 0.378 0.378 0.378 0.378 

Meter Volume vm dcf 32.245 33.000 35.730 35.970 34.648 

Meter Temperature t• °F 37.9 51.0 58.3 60.9 52.4 

,Avg. Orifice Delta H &H in. H,0 0.96 0.98 1.13 1.14 1.07 

Impingers Weight Gain (Moisture) 

Silica Gel Impinger Weight Gain (Moisture) 

grams 62.7 49.0 66.9 66.0 65.2 

grams 5.5 7.1 7.3 7.7 6.8 

18.0 

2.0 

Oxygen Concentration, dry basis 

Carbon Dioxide Concentration, dry basis 

18.0 

2.0 

18.0 

Avg. Sq. Rt. of Delta P 

Stack Temperature 

Total Hydrogen Chloride collected, mg 

Total Hydrogen Fluoride collected, mg 

2.0 

17.0 

W[mp 

CO= 2.0 

17.7 

2.0 

HCL 

(in. Hz0) 0.298 0.300 0.323 0.323 0.315 

°F 407.0 406.1 398.3 399.8 401.7 

13.968 6.921 6.841 9.243 

HF 209.980 201,305 200,497 

mg 

mg 20•.927 
ENTEC Services, inc. 

16-D Commerce Ave. Hueytown. Alabama 35023 

CALCULATED TEST DATA 

Client: Boral Brick 

Source: inlet to Scrubber 

Description Formulas 

Run Number 

Test Date 

Time Began-Ended 

1. Stack Pressure P•, P•/13.6 

2. Meter Pressure Pb•t 

3. Standard Meter Volume 17.64" (V..•rm)" (P•r AH 13.6) 

4a. Standard Volume of Water Vapor Condensed =0.04706"Wlm. 

4b. Standard Volume of Water Collected in Silica Gel 

5. Moisture Fraction 

9. Molecular Weight Of Stack Gas, dry basis 0.32"(O2)+ 0.44"(CO2)+0.28° (100-(O2)-(CO2)} 

10. Molecular Weight Of Stack Gas, wet basis 

11. Average Stack Gas Velocity 86.49"cD'(sqrt 

12. Stack Gas Flow @ Stack Conditions 60*v•'A 

13. Stack Gas Flow @ Standard Conditions 

14. Stack Gas Flow @ Dry Standard Conditions 

14b. Hydrogen Chlodde concentration @ Std.Cond.,Grains/Cu.Ft. 

14b. Hydrogen Fluodde concentration @ Std.Cond.,Grains/Cu.Ft_ 

=(O.01543*HCLm.)/Qs¢ 

=(O.01543*HFmq)IQ=• 

15b. Hydrogen Chlodde emissions. Ibs per hour =(60/7000) HCLQs•*Qst 

15b. Hydrogen Fluoride emissions, Ibs per hour =(60/7000)'HFQ=t='Q•. 

22. Volume collected through nozzle =TslPs.[0.002669*V•=÷ V•'y'pm/Tm] 

24. Isokinetic Sampling Rate, Percent 100"Vn/(60*vs'Aa'0 

Post Meter Orifice Cal. (EMC ALT.009 Yqa) 

Difference. (Calibration be within 5% of original Y-factor) 

Symbol Units 

Military 

Ps Hg 

V,•) 

Ms gig-mole 

Q• 

Job No.: 27127 

Data Input By: Art Otero 

Calculated Data 

3 4 AVERAGE 

02115107 02115/07 02115107 02/15107 

0841-0945 1052-1154 1300-1405 1445-1550 

29.18 29.18 29.18 29.18 29.18 

29.27 29.27 29.28 29.28 29.28 

33.939 33.843 36.141 36.208 35.429 

2.951 2.306 3.148 3.106 3.068 

0.259 0.335 0.344 0.363 0.322 

0.0864 0.0724 0.0881 0.0874 0.0873 

29.040 29.040 29.040 29.000 29.027 

28.086 28.241 28.067 28.038 28.064 

21.98 22.08 23.74 23.80 23.171 

37,801 37,973 40,828 40,941 39,856 

22,441 22.565 24.482 24.507 23,810 

20=502 20.932 22,324 22,364 21,730 

0.006 0.000 0.003 0.003 0.004 

0.095 0.000 0.086 0.085 0.089 

1.12 0.00 0.57 0.56 0.75 

16.78 0.00 16.45 16.38 16.53 

62.577 61.397 66.098 66.285 64.987 

101.50 99.13 99.26 99.26 100.01 
Sampling Procedures 

1 ̧I 
Procedures 

The emission rates were determined using EPA Methods 1-5, 9, & 26A of CFR Title 40, 

Part 60, Appendix A. The calibration and quality assurance procedures of EPA CFR 40 

Part 60 Appendix A for all methods, and the "Quality Assurance Handbook for Air 

Pollution Measurement System" Volume III Stationary Source-Specific Methods were 

followed throughout the duration of the field and laboratory testing. 

The most current revision revised as of July 1, 2004, of each method (as described in the 

Federal Register) was used. 

Stack Gas Volumetric Flow 

The velocity of the gas stream was determined according to EPA Reference Method 1 

and 2 by reading the instantaneous velocity head with an inclined manometer at each 

sampling point with a calibrated S-type pitot tube attached adjacent to the sample nozzle. 

The stack pressure was measured with the static side of an S-type pitot tube. A 

calibrated pyrometer was used to measure stack temperature at each sampling point. 

Moisture Content 

The moisture content used for calculating the gas stream flow rate was determined by 

weighing the amount of condensed moisture collected in the impingers of the sampling 

train as described in EPA Reference Method 4 at the completion of each test. The 

moisture content was conducted in conjunction with EPA Method 26A. 

Hydrogen Chloride and Hydrogen Fluoride, (HCI & HF) 

Preliminary data was used to determine stack temperature, pressure, and range of 

velocity heads, moisture content and stack gas dry molecular weight prior to sampling. 

The meter box was leak checked from the pump to the orifice. Initial and final leak 

checks of the sampling system and pitot lines were performed as outlined in Method 5 

and were recorded on the data sheets. The nozzle (glass with an angle of taper of 30 

degrees and of button hook design) was calibrated before and after the test using a 

micrometer and was recorded on the field data sheets. 

The sampling probe was placed at each sampling point to provide a total sampling time 

of sixty (60) minutes. The gases were drawn through a glass nozzle attached to a 
heated glass lined probe. The probe was maintained at the proper settings to obtain an 

exit temperature of greater than 248 o F during sampling. The gases then proceeded 

through borosilicate glass filter holder, with a Teflon frit filter support through a Teflon 

filter to remove particulate matter. The filter was maintained at a temperature of greater 

than 248 0 F. These temperatures were recorded at each point on the field data sheets. 

The gases were then scrubbed through a series of four pre-weighed impingers to capture 

hydrogen halides and halogens and moisture. (The optional first impinger for a knockout 

for moisture was not used.) The first and second impingers contained approximately 100 

ml of a 0.1N H2SO4 (acid) solution and the third and fourth impingers contained 

approximately 100 ml of a 0.1 N NaOH (alkaline) solution. The fifth impinger contained 

pre weighed silica gel to remove any remaining moisture. The gases pass through the 

impinger series in an ice bath to maintain a maximum exit temperature of 68 0 F. This 

temperature was also recorded on the data sheets. The clean and cool gases then 

entered the meter box where the gas flow and temperature were measured. 

After the completion of the test the sampling train and the probe nozzle assembly was 

transferred to the cleanup area making sure no particulate was lost. The cleanup data 

was recorded. 

The first and second impinger contents were transferred to its tared container, weighed 

and the rinsing from the glassware were added to this container. The third and fourth 

impinger was transferred to its respective tared container, weighed and the rinsing from 

the glassware was added to this container. The silica gel from the fifth impinger was 

transferred to its respective tared container and weighed. A blank of the sulfuric acid 

solution, sodium hydroxide, distilled water and acetone was taken. These containers 

were clearly marked and transported to the laboratory for analysis. The laboratory we 

used was Enthalpy Analytical, Inc. which is a certified laboratory in Georgia. 
Visua• Emissions 

Art Otero from Entec Services, Inc. stood at a distance sufficient to provide a clear view 

of the emissions with the sun oriented in the 140 ° sector to his back. Consistent with 

maintaining the above requirement, the observer did, as much as possible, make his 

observations from a position such that his line of vision is approximately perpendicular to 

the plume direction. The observer's line of sight did not include more than one plume at 

a time when multiple stacks are involved, and in any case the observer did make his 

observations with his line of sight perpendicular to the longer axis of such a set of 

multiple stacks (e.g., stub stacks on bag-houses). The observer recorded the name of 

the plant, emission location, facility type, observer's name and affiliation, and the date on 

a field data sheet. The time, estimated distance to the emission location, approximate 

wind direction, estimated wind speed, description of the sky condition (presence and 

color of clouds), and plume background are recorded on the field data sheets at the time 

opacity readings are initiated and completed. Observations were made in fifteen-second 

intervals and recorded in increments of 5% The baghouse was observed for three one 

hour runs in conjunction with the Method 5 / 26A testing. 

I,'] 
Entec Services, lnc 

16 D Commerce Ave. Hues, town, AL 35023 

STACK DRAWING & TRAVERSE POINT LOCATION 

i::iiiiiiiii::iiiilili i•i•.•:.•i•i•:.•:.•:.• i•i•:. •i•i•i•i•:. •:4 •:.•:.• • !•i•i• :.•!•::•i•i•::•:.•::• i•i•i•:.• i•:.•:.• • •;•i:: ii::i::i::i :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::i::iii::iii::i!i i::i ::ill ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: !iii iii!:/:::i:: iiiiil i•i::iiiiii i::i::i::iii i::iiiiii ii::iii ::iiiiii iiiiii:/:! ::iiii:;il i!::iii!iiiiiiiiiiii::i::ii!::iiiii::i::i::i:,i::i::i 

Client: Boral Brick Job No. 27121 

Source: No. 2 Main E•aghouse Stack Input By: ArtOtero 

Type of Traverse: Velocity (V) or Particulate (P): P 

Stack Diameter, inches: 65.75 

Stack Height, feet: 100 

Stack Properties: inches Duct Diameters 

Upstream Disturbance: 216.0 

Downstream Disturbance: 420.0 

3.29 

6.39 

Port Type Flange 

Stack Area, FtZ: 

Number of Ports: 

Length of Port, inches: 

Total Number of Traverse Points: 

Number of Points per diameter: 

Port Diameter 4.0 

23.579 

2 

7.• 

16 

8 

420.0 

INCHES 

•CHES 

Point No. 

Inside Stack Outside Nipple 

Inches Inches 

2.1 9.1 

6.9 13.9 

12.8 19.8 

21.2 28.2 

44.5 51.5 

53.0 60.0 

58.8 65.8 

63.6 70.6 

Adjusted points diameter > 24" no point closer than 1.0 inch 

Adjusted points diameter _< 24" no point closer than 0.5 inch 

Stack Diameters between 12-24 inches minimum points are 8 

4 points per port if the 812 diameters downstream and 

upstream criteria is met. 
Er tec Services, inc 

16 D Commerce Ave. Hueytown, AL 35023 

STACK DRAWING & TRAVERSE POINT LOCATION 

Client: Eiera• Brick Job No. 27127 

Source: •rdetto Scrubber Input By: Art Otero 

Type of Traverse: Velocity (V) or Particulate (P): _P. 

Stack Diameter, inches: 72.5 

Stack Height, feat: 100 

Stack Properties: Inches Duct Diameters 

Upstream Disturbance: 320.0 

Downstream Disturbance: 145.0 

4.41 

2.00 

Port Type Flange 

Stack Area, Ft•: 

Number of Ports: 

Length of Port, inches: 

Total Number of Traverse Points: 

Number of Points per diameter: 

Port Diameter 

28.668 

2 

9.00 

24 

12 

72.5 INCHES 

320.0 NCHES 

•45,0 NCHES 

Point No. 

Inside Stack Outside Nipple 

Inches Inches 

1.5 10.5 

2 4.9 13.9 

3 8.6 17.6 

4 12.8 21.8 

5 18.1 27.1 

6 25.8 34.8 

7 46.7 55.7 

8 54.4 63.4 

9 59.7 68.7 

10 63.9 72.9 

11 67.6 76.6 

12 7t.0 80.0 

Adjusted points diameter > 24" no point closer than 1.0 inch 

Adjusted points diameter < 24" no point closer than 0.5 inch 

Stack Diameters between 12-24 inches minimum points are 8 

4 points per port if the 8 2 diameters downstream and 

upstream criteria is met. 
Method 5/26A Sampling Train 

Filter Exit Temperatui'e 

(>248 F) 

I Impinger Exit Temperature 

(<68 F) 

Ice Bath 

::•S n ors liiiiiiiiiiiiii • .IN 0.1Nnpmger100ml#2 nplnger0, lN#3 -250,np'ng'#4 

Temperature