alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Argued and submitted October 27,

reversed and remanded December 22, 1999

#### HUTCHINSON, ANDERSON, COX and COONS, P. C., an Oregon Professional Corporation, fka Hutchinson, Anderson, Cox, Parrish and Coons, P. C., *Respondent, v.*Richard CRONK, *Appellant.*

(16-97-06018; CA A103273)

992 P2d 488

Daniel W. Goff argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant.

William H. Sherlock argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Jessica L. Wood, Stephen A. Hutchinson, and Hutchinson, Anderson, Cox, Coons & DuPriest, P. C.

Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Armstrong and Kistler, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*533PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff on its action to recover on a promissory note executed by defendant. The trial court entered the judgment after it granted a directed verdict for plaintiff under ORCP 60 at the close of plaintiffs case.1 In his amended answer, defendant alleges several affirmative defenses, including real party in interest, waiver, laches, partial failure of consideration and complete failure of consideration. Those defenses could present factual issues, including whether the note was intended to secure payment for future legal services. *See Thompson v. Dockstader,*131 Or App 254, 884 P2d 586 (1994) (reasoning that whether a note is given as security for an antecedent debt is a question for the factfinder). As a result of the trial court’s ruling, defendant was precluded from attempting to prove his affirmative defenses. ORCP 60 authorizes a motion for a directed verdict “at the close of all the evidence,” or “at the close of the evidence offered by an opponent.” Neither situation occurred here, and, consequently, the trial court erred.2 Because of our disposition, we do not reach defendant’s other arguments.

Reversed and remanded.

1

 ORCP 60 provides, in part:

> “Any party may move for a directed verdict at the close of the evidence offered by an opponent or at the close of all the evidence.”

2

 We do not decide what evidence is admissible in support of defendant’s defenses.
December 16 , 201 4



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

JASON RAY BOUCHARD , Appellant

NO. 14

- 13

- 00350

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

__ ______________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

.

We further order th is decision certified below for observance.
§ 1.914 Under what circumstances will we waive a requirement of this subpart? We will waive any requirement of this subpart with respect to any class of persons, vehicles, food, or nonfood products, when we determine that: ( a ) The waiver will not result in the transportation of food under conditions that would be unsafe for human or animal health; and
( b ) The waiver will not be contrary to the public interest.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

TJ FISHER
,

Appellant,

v.

PALM BEACH FLORIDA HOTEL AND OFFICE BUILDING LIMITED

PARTNERSHIP and NANTUCKET ENTERPRISES, INC.
, Appellee s

.

No. 4D 21

- 1017

[ February 17, 2022 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Joseph George Marx , Judge; L.T. Case No.

502008CA039646

.

TJ Fisher, West Palm Beach, pro se.

Timothy W. Schulz of Timothy W. Schulz, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building L imited

P artnership

.

Alan B Rose and Gregory S. Weiss of Mrachek, Fitzgerald et al, West Palm Beach, for appellee Nantucket Enterprises.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

K LINGENSMITH

, K UNTZ

, and A RTAU

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 96-60171 (Summary Calendar)
EMPIRE FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiffs-Appellees.

v. JERRY POWERS d/b/a POWERS USED CARS, INC., Defendants. and
LOLA CAGLE, ROBERT CAGLE, and EMILY CAGLE,
Defendants-Appellants,

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Northern District of Missippi

(1:94-CV228-JAD) October 25, 1996
Before GARWOOD, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Lol a Cagle, Robert Cagle, and Emily Cagle, defendantsa ppellants, argue that the magistrate judge erroneously appliedSection 2-401(2) of the Uniform Commercial code in determining

ownership of the 1989 Buick Park Avenue vehicle at the time of the accident instead of applying Section 63-21-31 of the Missippi Motor Vehicle Title Act. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we AFFIRM for reasons assigned by Magistrate Judge Davis.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Materials Prepared in Connection with the Study of Employment, Growth, and Price Levels for Consideration by the Joint Economic Committee, Congress of the United States

              																								United States. Congress. Joint Economic Committee, 1956-					 and 	Eighty-Sixth Congress, 1959-1961.						"Study Paper Nos. 12 and 13 : The Low Income Population and Economic Growth and The Adequacy of Resources for Economic Growth in the United States" in *Materials Prepared in Connection with the Study of Employment, Growth, and Price Levels for Consideration by the Joint Economic Committee, Congress of the United States*			(December 16, 1959).						https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/1244/item/3648, accessed on September 26, 2024.	    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
M14004 – Chemical 3 

CAS Name 

CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

The Board of Directors
Spacelabs Medical, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
33-47480, 33-50296, 33-71444, 33-95342 and 333-15815) on Form S-8 of Spacelabs
Medical, Inc., of our report dated February 3, 1999, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Spacelabs Medical, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1998 and December 26, 1997, and the related consolidated statements
of operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows and related financial
statement schedule for each of the years in the three-year period ended December
31, 1998, which report appears in the December 31, 1998 annual report on Form
10-K of Spacelabs Medical, Inc.


                                                   KPMG  LLP
Seattle, Washington
March 23, 1999
#### § 558.235 Efrotomycin.

(a) *Specifications.* Type A medicated articles containing 14.5 grams efrotomycin per pound.

(b) *Sponsor.* See No. 000010 in [§ 510.600(c) of this chapter](/on/2024-09-17/title-21/section-510.600#p-510.600(c)).

(c) *Related tolerances.* See [§ 556.224 of this chapter](/on/2024-09-17/title-21/section-556.224).

(d) *Conditions of use in swine* —

| Efrotomycin in grams/ton | Indications for use | Limitations | Sponsor |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| (1) 3.6 | Swine: For improved feed efficiency | Feed continuously as sole ration. Not to be used in swine weighing more than 250 pounds | 000010 |
| (2) 3.6 to 14.5 | Swine: For increased rate of weight gain | Feed continuously as sole ration. Not to be used in swine weighing more than 250 pounds | 000010 |

[[57 FR 38442](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/57-FR-38442), Aug. 25, 1992, as amended at [62 FR 63271](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/62-FR-63271), Nov. 28, 1997; [84 FR 33001](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/84-FR-33001), July 11, 2019; [84 FR 39185](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/84-FR-39185), Aug. 9, 2019; [85 FR 45309](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/85-FR-45309), July 28, 2020]
# L_2019257EN.01004701.xml

| 8.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 257/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 257/47

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) 2019/1680

of 7 October 2019

correcting the Czech language version of Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/436 on the harmonised standards for machinery drafted in support of Directive 2006/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on European standardisation, amending Council Directives 89/686/EEC and 93/15/EEC and Directives 94/9/EC, 94/25/EC, 95/16/EC, 97/23/EC, 98/34/EC, 2004/22/EC, 2007/23/EC, 2009/23/EC and 2009/105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Decision 87/95/EEC and Decision No 1673/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1), and in particular Article 10(6) thereof,

Having regard to Directive 2006/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on machinery, and amending Directive 95/16/EC (2), and in particular Article 7(3) and Article 10 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The Czech language version of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/436 (3) contains errors in the second paragraph of Article 1 and in Article 2 as regards the question whether and to what extent the machinery manufactured in conformity with the harmonised standards listed in Annexes II and III to that Decision is presumed to satisfy the relevant essential health and safety requirements of Directive 2006/42/EC. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The Czech language version of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/436 (3) contains errors in the second paragraph of Article 1 and in Article 2 as regards the question whether and to what extent the machinery manufactured in conformity with the harmonised standards listed in Annexes II and III to that Decision is presumed to satisfy the relevant essential health and safety requirements of Directive 2006/42/EC.

| (2) | The Czech language version of Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/436 should therefore be corrected accordingly. The other language versions are not affected, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Czech language version of Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/436 should therefore be corrected accordingly. The other language versions are not affected,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

(does not concern the English language)

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 7 October 2019.

For the Commission

The President

Jean-Claude JUNCKER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 316, 14.11.2012, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 157, 9.6.2006, p. 24.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/436 of 18 March 2019 on the harmonised standards for machinery drafted in support of Directive 2006/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 75, 19.3.2019, p. 108).

3

---
Editorial Note on Part 172
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 172 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; 70 FR 72074, Dec. 1, 2005; and 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 172.822 Sodium lauryl sulfate. The food additive sodium lauryl sulfate may be safely used in food in accordance with the following conditions: ( a ) The additive meets the following specifications: ( 1 ) It is a mixture of sodium alkyl sulfates consisting chiefly of sodium lauryl sulfate [CH2(CH2)10CH2OSO2Na].
( 2 ) It has a minimum content of 90 percent sodium alkyl sulfates.
( b ) It is used or intended for use: ( 1 ) As an emulsifier in or with egg whites whereby the additive does not exceed the following limits: Egg white solids, 1,000 parts per million. Frozen egg whites, 125 parts per million. Liquid egg whites, 125 parts per million.
( 2 ) As a whipping agent at a level not to exceed 0.5 percent by weight of gelatine used in the preparation of marshmallows.
( 3 ) As a surfactant in: ( i ) Fumaric acid-acidulated dry beverage base whereby the additive does not exceed 25 parts per million of the finished beverage and such beverage base is not for use in a food for which a standard of identity established under section 401 of the Act precludes such use.
( ii ) Fumaric acid-acidulated fruit juice drinks whereby the additive does not exceed 25 parts per million of the finished fruit juice drink and it is not used in a fruit juice drink for which a standard of identity established under section 401 of the Act precludes such use.
( 4 ) As a wetting agent at a level not to exceed 10 parts per million in the partition of high and low melting fractions of crude vegetable oils and animal fats, provided that the partition step is followed by a conventional refining process that includes alkali neutralization and deodorization of the fats and oils.
( c ) To insure the safe use of the additive, the label of the food additive container shall bear, in addition to the other information required by the Act: ( 1 ) The name of the additive, sodium lauryl sulfate.
( 2 ) Adequate use directions to provide a final product that complies with the limitations prescribed in paragraph (b) of this section.
[42 FR 14491, Mar. 15, 1977, as amended at 43 FR 18668, May 2, 1978]
#### Albertson et al. *v.*Nix et al.

[No. 17,280.

Filed October 23, 1944.]

*Robert S. Wagoner*and *L. N. Savage,*both of Rockport, for appellants.

*Darnel C. Goble,*of Cannelton, for appellees.

Royse, J.

— This is an attempt to appeal from a judgment of the Perry Circuit Court in an ejectment proceeding.

The appellees have not questioned the sufficiency of appellants’ brief. However, this court is bound by the Rules of the Supreme Court. Appellants’ brief wholly fails to comply with Rule 2-17. It does not set out the judgment of the trial court, the motion for a new trial or the substance thereof, the exhibit which it is asserted was erroneously admitted in evidence, or the substance of said exhibit.

*129While this court indulges a practical liberality in passing upon the sufficiency of briefs, the application of the rules may not be relaxed to the point of requiring us to search the record for grounds to reverse a judgment. *Wabash Township, Gibson County et al.*v. *Cooper et al.*(1943), 221 Ind. 304, 47 N. E. (2d) 611.

No question having been presented, the judgment of the Perry Circuit Court is affirmed.

Note. — Reported in 57 N. E. (2d) 206.
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1142 Prepped byOllie Stewart



## Document

Number: 

# 22 ) IV-F-2 0 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 4/23/200810:21:21 AM Sheet 22 of 30P. 2 

## /K-8 

## Vl l

PUBLI C HEARIN G NPR M Proposin g Onboar d Refuelin g Emissio n Standard s An n Arbor , Michigan , Jul y22,199 3

AGEND A Openin g Statemen t- Richar d Wilso n Testimon y America n Automobil e Manufacturer s Associatio n (Richar d Klimisch ) Genera l Motor s (Sa m Leonard ) For d Moto rCo . (Kell yBrown ) Chrysle r(Gordo n Allardyce ) Associatio n o fIntemationa l Automobil e Manufacturer s (Gre g Dana ) LUNC H BREA K America n Petroleu m Institut e (Bil l O'Keefe ) Toyot a (E d Brune ) Natura l Resource s Defens e Counci l (Debora h Sheiman ) Societ yo fIndependen tGasolin e Marketer s ofAmeric a an d th e Nationa l Associatio n o fConvenienc e Store s an d th e Petroleu m Marketer s Associatio n o fAmeric a (Jeffre yLeiter ) Insuranc e Institut e fo rHighwa ySafet y(Adria n Lund ) Recreatio n Vehicl e IndustryAssociatio n (Edwar d F . Conway , Jr. ) Hea tTechnology , Inc . (Fre d Heller )

G:\RDSD.IO\JMR\OnboanlAg d
###### Editorial Note on Part 14

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 14 appear at 88 FR 45065, July 14, 2023.

#### § 14.10 Applicability to Congress.

This part applies to Congress, individual Members of Congress, and other employees or representatives of Congress in the same way that they apply to any other member of the public, except that disclosure of advisory committee records to Congress is governed by § 20.87.
750

600

700

600

750

1050

600

1000

700

900

700

650

750

650

950

850

750

750

700

600

600

800

650

700

650

650

800

1050

700

600

650

850

Lake Superior

Lake Superior

Lake Superior

Lake Superior

Manitou

Camp

Hermit

Island

Oak

Island

Manitou

Island

Otter

Island

Apostle

Islands

Red Cliff

Point

Quarry

Point

Clay

Banks

Oak

Island

Shoal

Amnicon

Point

Oak

Island York

Island

Madeline

Island

Stockton

Island

Bayfield

Cat

Island

Bear

Island

Rocky

Island

00'

52

37'

E

630

30"

73

97

6

30"

96

51

6

51

6

51

52' 1

51

79

30"

42'

XN

99

45' 80

98

01

FEET

51

6 78

30"

90° 6

97

30"

52

6

42'

52

52

79

57'

96

45'

76 6

XM

01

660

98

06

XM

55'

52

04

90°

52

6

52

6

1 810

FEET

N

57'

52

FEET

51

000m

90°

06

40'

94

51

04

790 000m

75

05

30"

6

46°

52

51

46°

000m

6 77 78 E

40'

000

74

N

6 52'

73

72

75

000

6

FEET

000m

55'

000

76

51

52

02

30"

95

52

00'

6

52

6

47°

000

07

95

03

77

07

52

99

52

6

51

00

02

72

30"

51

90°

47°

37'

00

6

XN

80

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

WISCONSIN

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

OAK ISLAND, WI

2010

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Interstate Route US Route State Route

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

OAK ISLAND QUADRANGLE

WISCONSIN

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

Zone 15T

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator,

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Wisconsin Coordinate System of 1983

(north zone)

Imagery...................................................NAIP, August 2008

Roads..............................................©2006-2010 Tele Atlas

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2008

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 2008

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 2002

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

This map was produced to conform with version 0.5.10 of the

draft USGS Standards for 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Maps.

A metadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.5.11

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0 1

MILES

MN 1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

GN

UTM GRID AND 2010 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

1° 41 ́

30 MILS

1° 52 ́

33 MILS

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

15T

XM

XN 52 00

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988
### Geology and ground-water resources of the Greybull River-Dry Creek area, Wyoming

By: Charles Joseph RobinoveRussell H. Langford

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1596

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Aero Air, LLC.

Portland-Hillsboro Airport

2050 NE 25th Avenue

Hillsboro, OR 97124

Ph: 503.640.3711

Fax: 503.640.1093

www.aeroair.com

December 16, 2016

Docket Management Facility

US Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

West Building Ground Floor

Room W12-140

Washington, DC 20590

Exemption No. 11719, Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-0098

Dear Sir / Mam:

Aero Air, LLC, the parent company of Corsair Two, LLC, requested and received exemption 11719, 

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-0098 to allow Aero Air to conduct flights without a flight engineer as 

required per CFR 91.529(a) (1) on its DC-7/DC-7B aircraft (registration Nos. N401US, N6353C, and 

N838D). 

This exemption is currently set to expire on May 31, 2017. Aero Air requests that this exemption be 

renewed beginning May 1, 2017 in order to facilitate the use of this exemption during the 2017 fire 

season and beyond without interruption. Not having this exemption in place could place undue time 

constraints on locating and training appropriate personnel in order to be available for the 2017 

firefighting season. The conditions and reasons regarding public interest and safety for this exception 

remain unchanged for the previous submittal. 

If a flight engineer were to be mandated their services would be needed for only two or three weeks 

each year and there is no way he could maintain the currency requirements, so an annual flight check 

would be required. This would create an economic burden that would be detrimental to the costs 

passed to the customer/taxpayer.

Granting this request would be in the public interest because our services are paid for by taxes through 

public agencies. If we can keep our costs at a minimum, we can provide service at a lower cost to the 

government.

We would appreciate prompt consideration of this request to allow our transition into spring training as 

we complete the annual maintenance on the aircraft.

Please contact me at Aero Air should you have any additional questions or concerns.

Sincerely,

Kevin Mcloughlin

Director of Production/Air Tanker Operations

Aero Air LLC