alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

FIRST MARINER BANCORP    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to, and for purposes only of, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, I, Mark Keidel, Chief Financial Officer of First Mariner Bancorp (the "Company")
hereby certify that (i) the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Dated: March 29, 2004 |  | /s/MARK KEIDELMark Keidel
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------

---

QuickLinks
§ 522.995 Fluprostenol. ( a ) *Specifications.* Each milliliter of solution contains fluprostenol sodium equivalent to 50 micrograms (μg) of fluprostenol.
( b ) *Sponsor.* See No. 058198 in § 510.600(c) of this chapter.
( c ) *Conditions of use in horses* — ( 1 ) *Amount.* Administer 0.55 μg fluprostenol per kilogram of body weight by intramuscular injection.
( 2 ) *Indications for use.* For use in mares for its luteolytic effect to control the timing of estrus in estrous cycling and in clinically anestrous mares that have a corpus luteum.
( 3 ) *Limitations.* Do not use in horses intended for human consumption. Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian.
[79 FR 16189, Mar. 25, 2014, as amended at 86 FR 14820, Mar. 19, 2021]
EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of CirTran  Corporation  on Form
10-QSB for the period  ending March 31, 2002, as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Iehab Hawatmeh, President
and Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

December 23, 2002

                                        /s/ Iehab Hawatmeh
                                  __________________________________________
                                  Iehab Hawatmeh
                                  President and Chief Executive Officer
#### § 211.63 Equipment design, size, and location.

Equipment used in the manufacture, processing, packing, or holding of a drug product shall be of appropriate design, adequate size, and suitably located to facilitate operations for its intended use and for its cleaning and maintenance.
(logo) KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
            1600 Market Street
            Philadelphia, PA 19103-7212



                         Independent Accountant's Report

We have  examined  management's  assertion  about the  Electronic  Data  Systems
Corporation - Consumer Asset Management  Division's (the Division's)  compliance
with  the  minimum  servicing  standards  identified  in  the  Mortgage  Bankers
Association of America's UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM FOR MORTGAGE BANKERS
(USAP) as of, and for the nine months ending, September 30, 1996 included in the
accompanying management assertion.  Management is responsible for the Division's
compliance with those minimum  servicing  standards.  Our  responsibility  is to
express an opinion on  management's  assertion  about the Division's  compliance
based on our examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining,  on a test basis,  evidence about the Division's  compliance with the
minimum  servicing   standards  and  performing  such  other  procedures  as  we
considered  necessary  in the  circumstances.  We believe  that our  examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a
legal  determination  on the Division's  compliance  with the minimum  servicing
standards.

In our  opinion,  management's  assertion  that the Division  complied  with the
aforementioned  minimum servicing standards as of and for the nine months ending
September 30, 1996 is fairly stated in all material respects.


/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP



Philadelphia, PA
December 23, 1996


(logo) Member Firm of KMPG
§ 26.40 Start of the operational period. ( a ) The operational period will start at the end of the transition period after the parties have developed the list of conformity assessment bodies (CAB's) found to be equivalent. The provisions of §§ 26.40, 26.41, 26.42, 26.43, 26.44, 26.45, and 26.46 will apply only with regard to listed CAB's and only to the extent of any specifications and limitations contained on the list with regard to a CAB.
( b ) The operational period will apply to quality system evaluation reports and product evaluation reports generated by CAB's listed in accordance with this subpart for the evaluations performed in the respective territories of the parties, except if the parties agree otherwise.
DecaBDE Phase-out Initiative| Existing Chemicals | OPPT | US EPA

http://www.epa.gov/oppt/existingchemicals/pubs/actionplans/deccadbe.html [8/15/2012 1:50:27 PM] EPA Home Privacy and Security Notice Contact Us http://www.epa.gov/oppt/existingchemicals/pubs/actionplans/deccadbe.html Print As-Is Last updated on Wednesday, July 25, 2012 You are here: EPA Home Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention Pollution Prevention & Toxics Existing Chemicals DecaBDE Phase-out Initiative 

# Existing Chemicals

Contact Us Search: All EPA This Area



# DecaBDE Phase-out Initiative On December 17, 2009, as the result of negotiations with EPA, the two U.S. producers of decabromodiphenyl ether (decaBDE), Albemarle Corporation and Chemtura Corporation, and the largest U.S. importer, ICL Industrial Products, Inc., announced commitments to phase out decaBDE in the United States. DecaBDE is a flame retardant which has been used in electronics, wire and cable insulation, textiles, automobiles and airplanes, and other applications. The companies have committed to end production, importation, and sales of decaBDE for most uses in the United States by December 31, 2012, and to end all uses by the end of 2013. The company commitment letters and annual progress reports will be posted to this website. Steve Owens, EPA Assistant Administrator for the Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, issued the following statement in response to the announcement: “Though DecaBDE has been used as a flame retardant for years, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has long been concerned about its impact on human health and the environment. Studies have shown that decaBDE persists in the environment, potentially causes cancer and may impact brain function. DecaBDE also can degrade to more toxic chemicals that are frequently found in the environment and are hazardous to wildlife. “Today’s announcement by these companies to phase out decaBDE is an appropriate and responsible step to protect human health and the environment.” EPA intends to encourage the other minor importers of decaBDE to join this initiative. Company Commitment Letters Albemarle Corporation (PDF) (2 pp., 403 kb) Chemtura Corporation (PDF (2 pp., 34kb ) ICL Industrial Products, Inc. (PDF) ( 2 pp., 55 kb ) DecaBDE is a polybrominated diphenyl ether (PBDE). Find out more about PBDEs

. Existing Chemicals Home Basic Information Enhancing EPA's

Chemicals Management Program Managing Chemical

Risk Collecting and

Assessing Information on Chemicals Transparency:

Finding Public Information on Chemicals International Activities Related EPA Activities

Chemical

Characterizations Recent Announcements Share
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

I, Douglas W. Cowan, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10KSB-A of Retractable Technologies, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations, and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the small business issuer and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation; 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any changes in the small business issuer’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the small businessissuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal controlsover financial reporting; and 

 

5. The small business issuer’s othercertifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financialinformation; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date:     September 10, 2004
- 1 -

Alexander Van der Bellen

Managing Director and

Associate General Counsel

Delta Air Lines, Inc.

1212 New York Avenue NW

Washington, DC 20005

202.842.4184

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

March 23, 2015

via email and regulations.gov

Brett Kruger

Division Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division

Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Application of Delta, Aeromexico, and Skywest

For LAX-BJX Service

Docket DOT-OST-2013-0114, OST-1997-3289, OST-2000-7708

Dear Mr. Kruger:

This letter is to confirm that Delta has polled all of the carriers on the service list to the above 

referenced application and there are no objections. In these circumstances, we urge that the 

application be granted as soon as possible.

Respectfully submitted,

Alexander Van der Bellen

cc: Brian Hedberg, DOT

 Bob Finamore, DOT

 Reese Davidson, DOT

info@airlineinfo.com
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

I, John Low, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of Spescom Software, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, thisquarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in thisquarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

 

a) designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;

 

b) evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisquarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and

 

c) disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrantsinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

 

a) all significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Dated:   May 14, 2004 |
|----------------------------|
|                       |
|  /s/  John Low        |   |
| John Low                   |
| Chief  Financial Officer   |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 285 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 285

Expressing the sense of the United States House of Representatives that 
 Congress and the President should empower the creation of police and 
 community alliances designed to enhance and improve communication and 
collaboration between members of the law enforcement community and the 
                           public they serve.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2017

    Mr. Taylor (for himself, Mr. O'Halleran, Mr. Reichert, and Mr. 
Pascrell) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the United States House of Representatives that 
 Congress and the President should empower the creation of police and 
 community alliances designed to enhance and improve communication and 
collaboration between members of the law enforcement community and the 
                           public they serve.

Whereas the United States of America was founded upon the principles of 
        republican governance which include, but are not limited to, an 
        adherence to the rule of law;
Whereas the American law enforcement community embodies society's most salient 
        defenders of the rule of law;
Whereas the ability of the American law enforcement community to effectively 
        preserve the rights of American citizens and uphold the rule of law is 
        predicated upon a healthy and collaborative relationship between police 
        officers and the communities they serve;
Whereas police and community relations have recently experienced periods of 
        strain, where mistrust and suspicion have come to dominate police and 
        community interactions in many communities and undermine effective 
        policing strategies and public safety;
Whereas the legitimate concerns of citizens as well as those of the law 
        enforcement community are not always well understood by each respective 
        constituency; and
Whereas an open, constructive, and mutually respectful dialogue meant to address 
        these legitimate concerns can dramatically improve police and community 
        relations, improve public safety, and engage all of society's 
        stakeholders: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
Congress and the President should empower the creation of police and 
community alliances designed to enhance and improve communication and 
collaboration between members of the law enforcement community and the 
public they serve.
                                 <all>
```
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL
- TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 14a0414n.06
No. 13

- 5394 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. TOBY DEAN BEQUETTE , Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

BEFORE: SILER, GILMAN, and GIBBONS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM. Toby Dean Bequette, a federal prisoner, appeals through counsel the 57

- month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to a charge of being a felon in possession of a firearm. Bequette was charged with this offense after he pawned a stolen firearm. He entered a guilty plea. The presentence report calculated his guidelines sentencing range at 57 to 71 months of imprisonment . Bequette objected that his 1994 Florida conviction of robbery should not be counted as a crime of violence under USSG § § 4B1.2 and 2K2.1 (a)(3) . Without a previous conviction of a crime of violence, the guidelines range would have been 30 to 37 months of imprisonment . Beq uette argued that because the Florida statute defined robbery as accomplished by the use of force, violence, assault, or putting in fear, he may have committed a robbery by putting in fear, which would not necessarily be a crime of violence. The parties p resented argument on this issue at the sentencing hearing. The district court concluded that the FloridaNo. 13

- 5394

United States v. Bequette

- 2

- robbery conviction was a crime of violence and sentenced Bequette at the bottom of the resulting guidelines range. Bequette reasserts his argument on appeal. A determination that a prior offense is a crime of violence is reviewed de novo. United
States v. Evans , 699 F.3d 858, 862 (6th Cir. 2012). The Eleventh Circuit, which encompasses Florida, has persuasively held that robbery as defined in the Florida statute is a crime of violence and a violent felony. United States v. Lockley , 632 F.3d 1238, 1240

- 45 (11th Cir. 2011); United States v. Wilkerson , 286 F.3d 1324, 1325 (11th Cir. 2002). We have likewise determined t hat robbery under a Tennessee statute, which also includes putting in fear as an element, is categorically a violent felony. United States v. Mitchell , 743 F.3d 1054, 1059

- 60 (6th Cir. 2014). See also United States v. Taylor , 696 F.3d 628, 630

- 33 (6th Ci r. 2012) (upholding determination that larceny under a similar Michigan statute is violent felony). Bequette also argues that the Florida robbery statute is overbroad, such that it cannot be a crime of violence, citing Descamps v. United States , 133 S. Ct . 2276 (2013). However, in Mitchell , 743 F.3d at 1066, we rejected a similar argument, finding that the accomplishment of robbery by putting in fear was not broader than the generic definition of robbery. Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is aff irmed.
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.1


ALPHA AND OMEGA SEMICONDUCTOR LIMITED
CALENDAR YEAR 2017 EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE CASH BONUS PLAN


The following is a summary of the operation of the Executive Incentive Cash Bonus Plan (the “Plan”) established by Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited (the “Company”) for the calendar year ending December 31, 2017.


Participants


Executive officers and Vice Presidents.


Performance Bonus


Participants are eligible to receive a cash bonus based on the level of attainment of pre-specified corporate performance goals. The Company’s compensation committee establishes the performance goals to be attained.


Performance Goals


The corporate performance goals for cash bonus for calendar year 2017 are revenue and GAAP operating income. The amount of bonus earned is based on the level of attainment of a range of revenue and GAAP operating income for the year. A specified minimum amount of each of the revenue and GAAP operating income goals must be achieved before payment of an award under the Plan. The actual aggregate amount of the award earned by an executive officer for the calendar year will range from $0 to the maximum amount established for that officer (as set forth below) depending on the level of attainment of the performance goals. 


Target Bonus Awards


The Company’s compensation committee establishes the cash bonuses payable based on the level of attainment of the corporate performance goals. The target bonuses for each executive officer for calendar year 2017, as a percentage of base salary, are as follows: 


	
					
	Name
	Title
	Minimum Bonus
	Target Bonus
	Maximum Bonus

	Mike F. Chang
	Chief Executive Officer
	20%
	100%
	 220%

	Yifan Liang
	Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary
	12%
	60%
	132%

	Yueh-Se Ho
	Chief Operating Officer
	12%
	60%
	132%

	Daniel Chang
	Senior Vice President of Marketing
	12%
	60%
	132%