alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7475 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7475

   To require the GAO to conduct a study detailing the total cost of 
 unused construction materials that were obtained for the construction 
        of a border wall along the United States-Mexico border.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 28, 2024

Ms. Van Duyne introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Homeland Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require the GAO to conduct a study detailing the total cost of 
 unused construction materials that were obtained for the construction 
        of a border wall along the United States-Mexico border.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Border Wall Waste Accountability 
Act''.

SEC. 2. GAO STUDY ON COST OF UNUSED CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS FOR BORDER 
              WALL.

    Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this 
section, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to 
Congress a study detailing the total cost of unused construction 
materials that were obtained for the construction of a border wall 
along the United States-Mexico border.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-10279

Conference Calendar

 

JERRY RICKY HANNAH,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

NFN MARTIN, Officer, Price Daniel Unit; 

NFN HOOSER, Officer, Price Daniel Unit; 

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICEINSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, Price Daniel Unit,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:01-CV-22-C

--------------------

June 14, 2001

Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jerry Ricky Hannah, Texas prisoner number 897277, appeals

the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit as

frivolous. He contends that the defendants lost his tennis shoes

and that his due process rights were violated when he was not

given fair compensation for the shoes. The district court did

not abuse its discretion in concluding that Hannah’s claim for

the deprivation of his personal property was frivolous. See
No. 01-10279

-2-

Hudson v. Palmer, 468 U.S. 517, 533 (1984); Harper v. Showers,

174 F.3d 716, 718 & n.3 (5th Cir. 1999). Texas has an adequate

postdeprivation remedy for confiscation of prisoner property. 

Cathey v. Guenther, 47 F.3d 162, 164 (5th Cir. 1995). Hannah’s

appeal is without arguable merit and is frivolous. See Howard v.

King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal

is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 

The dismissal of this appeal and the dismissal as frivolous

by the district court each count as a “strike” for purposes of 28

U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 387-88

(5th Cir. 1996). Hannah therefore has two “strikes” under

28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). We caution Hannah that once he accumulates

three strikes, he may not proceed in forma pauperis in any civil

action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in

any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious

physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7286

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

EDWIN FLORES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:06-cr-00292-JCC-5)

Submitted: January 15, 2009 Decided: January 22, 2009

Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edwin Flores, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Leo Fahey, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Edwin Flores appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Flores , No. 1:06-cr00292-JCC-5 (E.D. Va. July 2, 2008). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Letterhead]

Report of Independent Accountants

Target
Corporation,
its Officers and Directors
    and
Target Receivables Corporation,
its Officers and Directors
As Transferor
    and
Retailers National Bank,
its Officers and Directors
As Servicer
    and
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
As Trustee

We
have audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States, the statements of financial condition of Retailers National Bank (the Bank), as of December 31, 2000 and
1999 and the related statements of income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the years then ended and have issued our report thereon dated January 24, 2001.

Our
audit, referred to in the preceding paragraph, included procedures applied to the documents and records relating to the servicing of credit card receivables under the Amended and Restated Target
Credit Card Master Trust Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the Pooling and Servicing Agreement), dated as of April 28, 2000. Our procedures were as follows:

Documents
and records relating to the servicing of credit card receivables under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement:



---



The
results of the procedures described above provided satisfactory evidential matter for the purposes of our audit of the financial statements, referred to in the introductory paragraph of this
letter, taken as a whole. The administration and servicing appear to be conducted in compliance with Article III and Article IV and Section 8.8 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement insofar as such
Articles and Section relate to accounting matters.

This
report is intended solely for the use of the specified users listed above and should not be used by those who have not agreed to the procedures and taken responsibility for the sufficiency of the
procedures for their purposes. However, this report is a matter of public record, as a result of inclusion as an exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by Target Receivables Corporation on
behalf of the Trust, and its distribution is not limited.

|                 |  |  |  | Very truly yours,
|---------------- |  |  |  | -----------------
|                 |  |  |  |                  
|January 24, 2001 |  |  |  |                  

---

QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 12

                            PSEG ENERGY HOLDINGS INC.
               Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                      Years Ended December 31,
                                                  -------------------------------------------------------------
                                                    2000         1999         1998         1997         1996
                                                  ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------
                                                                     (Thousands of Dollars)
<S>                                               <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>
Earnings as Defined in Regulation S-K (A):
   Pre-tax income from Continuing Operations      $ 158,205    $ 176,024    $  97,560    $  73,450    $  73,370
   (Income)/Loss from equity investees net of
   distributions                                     10,339        8,622       30,228      (35,318)      49,718
   Fixed Charges                                    160,099      106,092       93,936       79,351       60,714
   Amortization of capitalized interest                 212          668        2,049        1,990        1,737
   Capitalized interest                             (20,760)      (8,484)      (1,181)      (5,065)      (1,301)
                                                  ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------
   Earnings                                       $ 308,095    $ 282,922    $ 222,592    $ 114,408    $ 184,238
                                                  =========    =========    =========    =========    =========

Fixed Charges as Defined in Regulation S-K (B):
   Total interest expensed and capitalized        $ 157,277    $ 103,169    $  91,548    $  77,428    $  59,562
   Interest in rental expense                         2,822        2,923        2,388        1,923        1,152
                                                  ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------    ---------
   Total Fixed Charge                             $ 160,099    $ 106,092    $  93,936    $  79,351    $  60,714
                                                  =========    =========    =========    =========    =========

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                     1.92         2.67         2.37         1.44         3.03
</TABLE>

(A)   The term  "earnings"  shall be defined as pre-tax  income from  continuing
      operations before adjustment for minority interests or income or loss from
      equity investees. Add fixed charges adjusted to exclude and (a) the amount
      of any  interest  capitalized  during  the  period,  (b)  amortization  of
      capitalized interest and (c) distributed income of equity investees.  From
      the total, subtract interest capitalized.

(B)   Fixed Charges represent (a) interest, whether expensed or capitalized, (b)
      amortization of debt discount, premium and expense, and (c) an estimate of
      interest implicit in rentals.
IIB 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7508 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 5, 2024 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1285 Emancipation Highway in Fredericksburg, Virginia, as the ‘‘Gladys P. Todd Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

HR 7508 RFS

1 SECTION 1. GLADYS P. TODD POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 1285 Emancipation Highway in 

4 Fredericksburg, Virginia, shall be known and designated 

5 as the ‘‘Gladys P. Todd Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Gladys P. Todd Post 

10 Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 4, 

2024. 

Attest: KEVIN F. MCCUMBER, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7554 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7554

 To amend part A of title IV of the Social Security Act to ensure that 
Federal funds provided under the program of block grants to States for 
 temporary assistance for needy families are used to supplement State 
                   spending, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 5, 2024

  Ms. Tenney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend part A of title IV of the Social Security Act to ensure that 
Federal funds provided under the program of block grants to States for 
 temporary assistance for needy families are used to supplement State 
                   spending, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protect TANF Resources for Families 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON STATE DIVERSION OF FEDERAL FUNDS TO REPLACE 
              STATE SPENDING.

    (a) In General.--Section 404 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
604) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(l) Limitation on Use of Federal Funds To Replace State General 
Revenue Funds.--A State shall use Federal funds received under this 
part only to supplement funds that, in the absence of the Federal 
funds, would be made available from State and local sources for 
programs assisted under this part, and not to supplant the funds.''.
    (b) State Certification.--Section 402(a) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 
602(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(9) Certification of state supplementation.--A 
        certification by the chief executive officer of the State that 
        the funds provided to the State under this part will not be 
        used to supplant State or non-Federal funds for services and 
        activities that promote the purposes of this part.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect on October 1, 2025.

SEC. 3. TWO-YEAR REAUTHORIZATION OF THE TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY 
              FAMILIES PROGRAM.

    Activities authorized by part A of title IV (other than under 
section 403(c) or 418) and section 1108(b) of the Social Security Act 
shall continue through September 30, 2026, in the manner authorized for 
fiscal year 2023, and out of any money in the Treasury of the United 
States not otherwise appropriated, there are hereby appropriated such 
sums as may be necessary for such purpose.
                                 <all>
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 23

- 00097

- CV
IN THE GUARDIANSHIP OF Javier J. TREVINO , an Incapacitated Person From the County Court at Law No

. 2 , Webb County, Texas Trial Court No. 2022PB6000079

- L2 Honorable Victor Villarreal , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios , Justice Beth Watkins , Justice Delivered and Filed: June 28, 2023
DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION On January 31, 2023, counsel Armando Trevi n o filed a notice of appeal seeking to appeal the trial court’s January 25, 2023 order grantin g the first amended motion to show authority. The order concludes he does not have authority to represent Javier J. Trevi n o, the ward in the proceedings, and strikes each pleading filed by him. He cites additional orders, but they do not appear in the cler k’s record. Absent an appealable interlocutory order or written final judgment, this court has no jurisdiction over this appeal. See Matter of Guardianship of Jones , 629 S.W.3d 921, 925 (Tex. 2021) (explaining order in guardianship proceeding was final jud gment if it disposed of all issues and all parties in particular phase of proceeding in which motion seeking order filed); Bosch v. Harris Cnty. , No. 14

- 13

- 00739

- CV, 2013 WL 5503744, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] Oct. 1, 2013, no pet.) (concluding order on Rule 12 motion to show authority04

- 2 3

- 00097

- CV

- 2

- not appealable until merged into final judgment); see also Ogletree v. Matthews , 262 S.W.3d 316, 319 n.1 (Tex. 2007); Lehmann v. Har Con Corp. , 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). W e therefore ordered counsel Armando T revino to show cause in writing by June 5, 2023, why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Counsel Armando Trevino has not filed a response. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.3(a), (c).

PER CURIAM
<PAGE>   1
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form S-1 of our
report dated April 16, 1999, except for paragraphs two through four of Note 13,
as to which the date is June 18, 1999, relating to the financial statements of
FreeShop.com, Inc., of our report dated May 6, 1999, relating to the financial
statements of Commonsite LLC, and of our report dated May 24, 1999 relating to
the financial statements of Travel Companions International, Inc. which appear
in such Registration Statement. We also consent to the references to us under
the heading "Experts," in such Registration Statement.




PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Seattle, Washington
June 18, 1999
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 
 FORM
10-Q/A  AMENDMENT NO. 1
 
 (Mark One)
 þ
    
    QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2005
 o
    
    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 Commission File Number 1-11263
 
 EXIDE TECHNOLOGIES
 (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
 
 Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
    
    23-0552730
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)13000 Deerfield Parkway,
Building 200
Alpharetta, Georgia
(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    30004
(Zip Code)
 (678) 566-9000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
 
 þ  ̈
 þ o
 þ o
 o þ




---



##### 



EXPLANATORY NOTE




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  EXIDE TECHNOLOGIESBy:
    /S/ J. TIMOTHY GARGAROJ. Timothy GargaroExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial OfficerDate: November 9, 2005EXIDE TECHNOLOGIESBy:
    /S/    PHILLIP A. DAMASKAPhillip A. DamaskaVice President and Corporate Controller
Date: November 9, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7474 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7474

  To direct the Secretary of the Interior to remove the Robert E. Lee 
   Monument at Antietam National Battlefield, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 28, 2024

Mr. Trone (for himself, Mr. Hoyer, Mr. Ivey, Mr. Mfume, Mr. Raskin, Mr. 
 Ruppersberger, and Mr. Sarbanes) introduced the following bill; which 
           was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Secretary of the Interior to remove the Robert E. Lee 
   Monument at Antietam National Battlefield, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Robert E. Lee Monument Removal 
Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) Monument.--The term ``monument'' means the statue of 
        the Confederate General Robert E. Lee that stands on property, 
        known as the historic Newcomer House and Farmstead, acquired in 
        2005 by the National Park Service as part of the expansion of 
        Antietam National Battlefield.
            (2) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of the Interior.

SEC. 3. REMOVAL OF MONUMENT.

    (a) Removal.--As soon as practicable, the Secretary shall--
            (1) remove the monument from National Park Service property 
        for destruction pursuant to subsection (b); and
            (2) restore the site of the monument in a manner consistent 
        with the protection and interpretation of the Antietam National 
        Battlefield.
    (b) Destruction of Monument.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall procure the services 
        of a private entity to destroy the monument.
            (2) Sale of materials.--The Secretary may sell the raw 
        materials of the destroyed monument as scrap and may retain 
        such proceeds of such sale as may be necessary to offset the 
        costs of procuring services described in paragraph (1).
            (3) Status of materials.--For the purposes of subchapters 
        II and III of chapter 5 of subtitle I of title 40, United 
        States Code, the raw materials of the statue shall not be 
        considered ``excess property'' or ``surplus property''.
    (c) Plan.--Before removing the monument, and not later than 1 year 
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit 
to the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives a 
plan with respect to removing and destroying the monument, including 
the timeline for removal.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 1794]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-429]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Nursing Research; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Nursing Research 
Initial Review Group.
    Date: February 18-19, 2010.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 12 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Bethesda Marriott Suites, 6711 Democracy Boulevard, 
Bethesda, MD 20817.
    Contact Person: Weiqun Li, MD, Scientific Review Officer, 
National Institute of Nursing Research, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Ste. 710, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 
594-5966, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a4d3c8cde4c9c5cdc88acacdcc8ac3cbd2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2a5d46436a474b434604444342044d455c">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Any interested person may file written comments with the 
committee by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed 
on this notice. The statement should include the name, address, 
telephone number and when applicable, the business or professional 
affiliation of the interested person.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.361, 
Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 6, 2010.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-429 Filed 1-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>