alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549


                                    FORM 8-K
                                 CURRENT REPORT


                     Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
                         Securities Exchange Act of 1934



Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported) November 1, 1999.

                              THE LOEWEN GROUP INC.
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>                           <C>
  British Columbia, Canada               0-18429                         98-0121376
----------------------------    ------------------------      ---------------------------------
(State or other jurisdiction    (Commission File Number)      (IRS Employer Identification No.)
of incorporation)
</TABLE>


          4126 Norland Avenue, Burnaby, British Columbia      V5G 3S8
         --------------------------------------------------------------
              (Address of principal executive offices)       (zip code)



Registrant's telephone number, including area code      604-299-9321
                                                  ------------------

                                       N/A
         -------------------------------------------------------------
         (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)




                                                      Exhibit Index is on page 3
                                                                     Page 1 of 7


<PAGE>   2



ITEM 5. OTHER EVENTS.

Pursuant to Form 8-K, General Instructions F, registrant hereby incorporates by
reference the press release attached hereto as Exhibit 99.



<TABLE>
<S>          <C>
ITEM 7.      FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND EXHIBITS.

             Exhibit No.  Description

             Exhibit 99   The Loewen Group Inc. Press Release dated November 1, 1999.
</TABLE>



                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

Dated: November 1, 1999.

                                             THE LOEWEN GROUP INC.




                                             By: /s/ BRADLEY D. STAM
                                             -----------------------
                                             Name:   Bradley D. Stam
                                             Title:  Senior Vice President, Law



<PAGE>   3


                                  EXHIBIT INDEX






                                                                     Sequential
Number      Exhibit                                                  Page Number
------      -------                                                  -----------
99          The Loewen Group Inc.                                              4
            Press Release dated November 1, 1999
### Landsat ecosystem disturbance adaptive processing system (LEDAPS) algorithm description

By: Gail Schmidt**Calli B. Jenkerson**Jeffrey MasekEric VermoteFeng Gao**

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20131057

#### Links

- More information:  **USGS Index Page**
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report** 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000851726
<NAME> AZCO MINING INC
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      18,995,439
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,412,529
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            21,407,968
<PP&E>                                         559,198
<DEPRECIATION>                               (112,696)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,854,470
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          591,796
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        51,327
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,211,347
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,854,470
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               545,014
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,091,432
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,546,418)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,715,237)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (831,181)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (831,181)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)
        

</TABLE>
#### Zillman v. Kraus et ux.

*Edward E. Petrillo,*for plaintiff.

*Brooks, Curtze & Silin,*for defendants.

August 11, 1951.

Evans, P. J.,

— This matter is before the court on preliminary objections to a complaint seeking damages in an action of trespass.

First objection is to the service of process, which was secured by handing a true and correct copy of the complaint to Mrs. Mary Jane Kraus, wife of defendant Earl L. Kraus, at his residence, 134 East 9th Street, Erie, Pa. Ordinarily, testimony should be taken on the question involved, but in defendants’ brief it is stated that Mr. Kraus was recalled to military service and is stationed at Camp Le Jeune, N. C. It is admitted, however, that he and his wife jointly signed a lease for the premises in Erie, that his furniture is there and that his wife continues to reside in said premises. It is agreed that we may assume these facts.

Rule 1009(b) (2) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, provides for service “by handing a copy at *375the residence of the defendant to an adult member of the family with which he resides”. It is contended that this defendant no longer resides in Erie and service is therefore void. In Raymond v. Leishman, 243 Pa. 64, it is held that a person may have only one domicile but he may have several places of residence. Residence combined with intention to remain constitutes domicile. In Robinson v. Robinson, 362 Pa. 554, it is held that statutes permitting substituted service must be construed in a manner consistent with the purpose to assure that defendant will actually get knowledge of the commencement of action against him and of his duty to defend. In this latter case it was held that a defendant who had left the home of his parents in Pennsylvania with his belongings, and who had no apparent intention to return, cannot be held bound by a service made at the home of his parents after he had departed. However, in the case at bar we feel that at least one residence of defendant is at the location where service was made. His wife, with whom he is living, and his personal belongings and furniture upon property leased by him meet, with respect to residence, the legal requirements of the above-recited rule of procedure. We are required to hold the service to be valid.

Other objections are made as to the insufficiency of allegations and these contentions are admitted.

*Order*

And now, to wit, August 11, 1951, the preliminary objections of defendants to sufficiency of the allegations of the complaint are sustained and plaintiff is required to amend paragraphs 6, 7, 8,10 and 11 of the complaint within 15 days to meet the objections. The objection with regard to service of the complaint is overruled and dismissed.
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.1


             CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG, LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-00436) pertaining to the 1995 Director's Stock Option Plan,
the 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the 1995 Stock Option Plan and the 1987
Stock Option Plan of our report dated February 5, 1998, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of KeraVision, Inc. included in its Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1997.


                                        /S/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


San Jose, California
March 30, 1998
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6930

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ALBERT SHAW NELSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (5:95-cr-00333-CMC; 5:99-cv-04168-CMC) Submitted: October 19, 2007 Decided: November 8, 2007 Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Albert Shaw Nelson, Appellant Pro Se. Marvin Jennings Caughman, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Albert Shaw Nelson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000); Reid v. Angelone , 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Nelson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We grant leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 520.1840 Poloxalene. ( a ) *Specifications.* Polyoxypropylene-polyoxyethylene glycol nonionic block polymer.
( b ) *Sponsors.* See sponsors in § 510.600(c) of this chapter for use as in paragraph (d) of this section. ( 1 ) No. 054771 for use as in paragraphs (d)(1) and (d)(3) of this section.
( 2 ) No. 067949 for use as in paragraph (d)(2) of this section.
( 3 ) No. 066104 for use as in paragraph (d)(3) of this section.
( c ) *Related tolerances.* See § 556.517 of this chapter.
( d ) *Conditions of use.* ( 1 ) For treatment of legume (alfalfa, clover) bloat in cattle. Administer as a drench at the rate of 25 grams for animals up to 500 pounds and 50 grams for animals over 500 pounds of body weight.
( 2 ) For control of legume (alfalfa, clover) bloat in cattle. Administer, in molasses block containing 6.6 percent poloxalene, at the rate of 0.8 oz. of block (1.5 grams poloxalene) per 100 lbs. of body weight per day.
( 3 ) For prevention of legume (alfalfa, clover) and wheat pasture bloat in cattle. A 53-percent poloxalene top dressing on individual rations of ground feed. Dosage is 1 gram of poloxalene per 100 pounds of body weight daily. If bloating conditions are severe, the dose is doubled. Treatment should be started 2 to 3 days before exposure to bloat-producing conditions. Repeat use of the drug if animals are exposed to bloat-producing conditions for more than 12 hours after the last treatment. Do not exceed the double dose in any 24-hour period.
[40 FR 13838, Mar. 27, 1975, as amended at 40 FR 39857, Aug. 29, 1975; 42 FR 41854, Aug. 19, 1977; 50 FR 5385, Feb. 8, 1985; 54 FR 33501, Aug. 15, 1989; 56 FR 50653, Oct. 8, 1991; 58 FR 26523, May 4, 1993; 60 FR 55659, Nov. 2, 1995; 66 FR 47963, Sept. 17, 2001; 69 FR 62811, Oct. 28, 2004; 70 FR 32489, June 3, 2005; 78 FR 28826, May 20, 2014; 83 FR 48946, Sept. 28, 2018; 84 FR 32992, July 11, 2019]
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.10


                             THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE

                       REVOLVING LINE OF CREDIT AGREEMENT

This THIRD AMENDMENT ("Amendment") is dated as of October 1, 1998, by and
between WFS FINANCIAL INC, a California corporation ("WFS"), and WESTERN
FINANCIAL BANK, a federally-chartered savings bank (fka Western Financial
Savings Bank, F.S.B.) (the "Bank"), and amends the REVOLVING LINE OF CREDIT
AGREEMENT ("Agreement"), as amended, entered into by the parties on May 1, 1995,
pursuant to the transfer of certain assets of the Bank to WFS.

                                    RECITALS

A.       The Agreement is being amended to reflect differing interest spreads.

                                    AGREEMENT

         In consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein, and in
reliance upon the recitals set forth above, the parties agree as follows:

         1.       CERTAIN DEFINITIONS

                  The definition of "INTEREST SPREAD" is hereby deleted and
replaced with the following:

                  "INTEREST SPREAD" shall mean

                           (I) for the first $600 million Obligation (a)
                  one-half percent (.5%) with respect to any Obligations not
                  secured by Collateral acceptable to the Bank in its sole
                  discretion, and (b) one-tenth of one percent (.1%) with
                  respect to any Obligations secured by Collateral acceptable to
                  the Bank in its sole discretion, and

                           (II) for the next $300 million Obligation (a) eight
                  tenths of one percent (.8%) with respect to any Obligations
                  not secured by Collateral acceptable to the Bank in its sole
                  discretion, and (b) four-tenths of one percent (.4%) with
                  respect to any Obligations secured by Collateral acceptable to
                  the Bank in its sole discretion.

         Except as specifically amended herein, all terms of the Agreement as
previously amended shall remain in full force and effect. Wherefore, the
undersigned have executed this Amendment on the date set forth below to be
effective as of the date first set forth above.

WFS FINANCIAL INC



----------------------------                                     October 9, 1998
Joy Schaefer, President


WESTERN FINANCIAL BANK



----------------------------                                     October 9, 1998
Lee A. Whatcott, Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
Editorial Note on Part 172
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 172 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; 70 FR 72074, Dec. 1, 2005; and 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 172.225 Methyl and ethyl esters of fatty acids produced from edible fats and oils. Methyl esters and ethyl esters of fatty acids produced from edible fats and oils may be safely used in food, subject to the following prescribed conditions: ( a ) The additive consists of a mixture of either methyl or ethyl esters of fatty acids produced from edible fats and oils and meets the following specifications: ( 1 ) Not less than 90 percent methyl or ethyl esters of fatty acids.
( 2 ) Not more than 1.5 percent unsaponifiable matter.
( b ) The additive is used or intended for use at the level not to exceed 3 percent by weight in an aqueous emulsion in dehydrating grapes to produce raisins, whereby the residue of the additive on the raisins does not exceed 200 parts per million.
[57 FR 12711, Apr. 13, 1992]
# C ou rt o f

A p pea ls

o f t h e S t at e o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

Th e Co u r t

o f Ap pea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

ol l o wi n g o rd

er :

A1 9 A 1 9 2 5

. SEBORI S ROBI NSON BROOKS, J R. v . THE STATE.

Seb o ri s Ro bi ns o n Bro o k s , J r., was co n v i ct ed o f m u rd er an d o th er o ffen s es an d

was s en t en ced t o l ife i n p ri s o n

. Th e Su prem e Co u rt affi rm ed h i s co n v i ct i on s o n d i rect

ap p eal

. See Br o o ks v. S t a t e , 28 1 Ga. 1 4 (6 3 5 SE2 d 7 2 3 ) (2 0 0 6 ). Bro o k s s u b s eq u en t ly

ch al len g ed h i s co n v i ct i o n s b y fi l i n g a “ m ot i o n t o set as i d e a v o i d i n d i ct m en t ,” wh i ch

t h e t ri al co u rt d en ied . Bro o k s t h en ap p eal ed t o t h i s Co u rt

.

Un d er o u r Co n s t i t u t io n , ho wev er, t h e Su p rem e Co u rt h as ap p el l at e ju ri s d i ct i o n

o v er “ [a] l l cas es i n wh i ch a s en t en ce o f d eat h was im p o s ed o r co u ld be i m

p o sed .” See

Ga. Co n st

. o f 1 9 8 3, Art

. VI, Sec. VI, Par. III (8 ). Becau s e a p en al ty o f d eat h can b e
i m p o s ed fo r th e cri m e o f m u rd er, ju ri s d ict i o n i s p ro p er i n t h e S u p r e m e Co u rt

. See

OCGA § 1 7 -1 0 -3 0 (b ); Nea l v. S t a t e , 2 9 0 Ga. 5 6 3

, 5 7 2 (7 2 2 SE2 d 7 6 5) (2 01 2 ) (Hu n s t ei n, C. J., co n cu rri n g ); s ee al s o S t a t e v. Th o rn t o n , 2 5 3 Ga. 5 2 4

, 52 4 (1 ) (3 2 2

SE2 d 7 1 1 ) (1 9 8 4 ) (d i rect i n g t h i s Co u rt t o t ran s fer “ al l cas es i n wh i ch ei th er a s en t en ce

o f d eat h o r o f l i fe i m

p ri s on m en t h as b een i m

p os ed u po n co n v i ct i o n o f m u rd er”). Th e
Su p rem e Co u rt ’ s ju ri s d i ct ion ove r m ur de r c a se s inc lu des ap p eal s fro m o rd ers res o l v i n g

p o s t -ju d g m en t m o t i o n s i n su ch cas es

. See S i mp so n v. S t a t e , 2 9 2 Ga. 7 6 4 (7 4 0 SE2 d

1 2 4 ) (2 0 1 3 ) (ap p eal fro m d en i al o f m o t i o n at t ack i n g m u rd er co n v ict i o n s as v o i d ).

Acco rd i ng l y , t h i s ap p eal i s h ereb y TRANSFERRED t o th e Su p rem e Co u rt fo r
d i sp o s i t i o n

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a ls o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g i a C l e r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t l a n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t if y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f th e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i t n e s s m y s i g n a tu r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e to a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. June 19, 2019

06/19/2019
Exhibit 99.2
February 28, 1996

Deloitte & Touche LLP
50 South Main Street
Suite 1800
Salt Lake City, Utah 84144

In connection with your examination relating to our assertion that First 
Security Bank of Idaho, N.A. and First Security Bank of Utah, N.A. (jointly 
the "Company") has complied with the minimum servicing standards set forth in
the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation 
Program for Mortgage Bankers (USAP) as of December 31, 1995 and for the period
 July 31, 1995 (date of formation) to December 31, 1995 for the First Security
Auto Grantor Trust 1995-A (the Auto Loan Pool), for the purpose of expressing 
an opinion as to whether our assertion is fairly stated, we make the following
representations, to the best of our knowledge and belief, as of the date of 
this letter:
1.  We are responsible for the representations made herein and the 
appropriateness of the measurement and disclosure criteria on which they are 
based.

2.  We are responsible for establishing and maintaining an effective internal
control structure over compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

3.  We have made available all significant information that is relevant to 
your examination related to our compliance with the standards in the USAP, as 
applicable to the Auto Loan Pool.

4.  We have performed an evaluation of the Company's compliance with the 
minimum servicing standards in the USAP, as applicable to the Auto Loan Pool.

5.  There are no instances of noncompliance with the standards in the USAP as
applicable to the Auto Loan Pool.

6.  We have disclosed to you all communications that we received from 
regulatory agencies, secondary market agencies, and investors that relate
to compliance with the Company's servicing agreements.

7.  The data files provided to Lewtan are complete and accurate and include 
all activity affecting the Auto Loan Pool for the respective periods.

8.  All transfers from the Company's operating accounts to the Trustee were in
accordance with the applicable agreements and in agreement with the Lewtan 
reports.

9.  There have been no instances of noncompliance subsequent to the date of 
this letter.

10. For the period from July 31, 1995 to December 31, 1995, the Company has 
complied with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the USAP.


February 28, 1996

(Signed)
____________________________________________
Gayle Nye, 
Senior Vice President and Manager
  Small Business and Consumer Loan Servicing



February 28, 1996

(Signed)
____________________________________________
Sharlene Hill, 
Assistant Vice President
  Comptroller's Department
Exhibit 10.18  Amendment No. 1 to the Ballantyne Strong, Inc.
Non-Employee Directors Restricted Stock Plan  The
Ballantyne Strong, Inc. Non-Employee Directors Restricted Stock Plan (the Plan)
is hereby amended as follows:  1.The first
sentence of Section 4(a) of the Plan is amended to read as follows:  (a)Subject to
adjustments provided in Section 4(b) hereof, the total number of
Shares reserved for issuance in connection with Awards under the Plan shall be
250,000 Shares.  2.All other
terms, conditions and provisions of the Plan remain the same.  Dated this 21stday of May, 2009.   Ballantyne
  Strong, Inc.By:
  /s/
  John P. WilmersJohn
  P. Wilmers, President  Attest:  I
hereby certify that the above Amendment No. 1 to the Ballantyne Strong, Inc.
Non-Employee Directors Restricted Stock Plan was approved by the Board of
Directors of the Corporation at a regular, quarterly meeting of the Board of
Directors duly called and held on the 31stday of March,
2009, and was approved by the Stockholders at the annual meeting of the
Stockholders held on the 21stday of May, 2009.  Dated
at Omaha, Nebraska on this 21stday of May, 2009.   /s/
  Kevin HerrmannKevin
  Herrmann, Secretary