alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2006 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

4-7-2006

USA v. Assmus

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 05-2103

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2006 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"USA v. Assmus" (2006). 2006 Decisions. Paper 1289.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006/1289
 *

The Honorable Louis H. Pollak, Senior District Judge, United States District Court,

sitting by designation.

NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No: 05-2103

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 v.

WILLIAM ASSMUS,

 Appellant

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of New Jersey

D.C. Criminal No. 04-cr-00439

District Judge: Hon. Jerome B. Simandle

Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)

March 27, 2006

Before: McKee, Van Antwerpen Circuit Judges and

Pollak, District Judge*

(Opinion filed: April 7, 2006)

 

OPINION

 

McKee, Circuit Judge

William Assmus appeals the sentence that was imposed after he admitted violating

the conditions of his supervised release. For the reasons that follow, we will affirm.

Because we write primarily for the parties who are familiar with this case, we need
2

not set forth the factual or procedural background of this appeal. 

Defense counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738,

744 (1967), informing us that she has reviewed the record and found no nonfrivilous

issues for appeal. Accordingly, she requests permission to withdraw. Our review of the

record confirms counsel’s assessment that there are no nonfrivilous issues for appeal.

The defendant admitted the violations of the supervised release that form the basis

of his sentence after he was informed of his rights and stated on the record that he was

satisfied with counsel’s representation. Although there was initially some confusion

about the amount of credit defendant was entitled to for time previously spent in state

custody, defense counsel correctly concludes that the court did not have authority to

award that credit. See, 18 U.S.C. § 3585(b); U.S. v. Wilson, 503 U.S.329, 334 (1992). 

Moreover, counsel represents that she has attempted to resolve the issue of that credit, and

that the issue “provides no basis for appeal.” Appellant’s brief at 14.

Since there are no nonfrivilous issues for appeal, the judgment of conviction filed

March 28, 2005 is hereby affirmed, and counsel will be granted leave to withdraw.
|  Company Name                          | Jurisdiction of Organization |
|---------------------------------------------|------------------------------|
|                                        |                         |
|                                        |                         |
| Astea FSC                                   | Barbados                     |
| Astea International Australian Pty Ltd.     | Australia                    |
| Astea International Japan, Inc.             | Japan                        |
| Astea Israel Ltd.                           | Israel                       |
| Astea Ltd.                                  | England                      |
| Astea Service and Distribution Systems B.V. | Netherlands                  |
| FC Acquisition Corp.                        | Delaware                     |
| Network Data, Inc.                          | Delaware                     |
| Virtual Service Corp.                       | Pennsylvania                 |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           3,232
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,193
<ALLOWANCES>                                       655
<INVENTORY>                                      5,986
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,120
<PP&E>                                           5,757
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (995)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  50,655
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,407
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        500
<COMMON>                                        39,583
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,226
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    50,655
<SALES>                                         75,728
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                75,728
<CGS>                                           61,641
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   61,641
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                22,987
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   495
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 268
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,353)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,863)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,490)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,490)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.52)


</TABLE>
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 17

- 00182

- CR

RICHARD BRUCKER

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

From the 19th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016

- 538

- C1

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Richard Brucker appeals his conviction. However, the certification of defendant's

right of appeal

, which Brucker signed

, indicates that he has waived his right to appeal.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 25.2(d); Monreal v. State , 99

S.W.3d 615, 622 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003).

TOM GRAY

Chief JusticeBrucker v. State Page 2

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

A ppeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed June 14 , 2017

Do not publish

[CR25]
§ 520.903b Febantel suspension. ( a ) *Specifications.* Each ounce of suspension contains 2.75 grams (9.3 percent ounce) febantel.
( b ) *Sponsor.* See No. 058198 in § 510.600(c) of this chapter.
( c ) *Conditions of use in horses* — ( 1 ) *Amount.* 3 milliliters per 100 pounds body weight or 1 fluid ounce per 1000 pounds (6 milligrams per kilogram body weight). Administer by stomach tube or drench, or by mixing well into a portion of the normal grain ration. For animals maintained on premises where reinfection is likely to occur, retreatment may be necessary. For most effective results, retreat in 6 to 8 weeks.
( 2 ) *Indications for use.* For removal of ascarids (*Parascaris equorum*—adult and sexually immature), pinworms (*Oxyuris equi*—adult and 4th stage larvae), large strongyles (*Strongylus vulgaris, S. edentatus,* *S. equinus*), and various small strongyles in horses, breeding stallions and mares, pregnant mares, foals, and ponies.
( 3 ) *Limitations.* Do not use in horses intended for human consumption. Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian.
( d ) *Special considerations.* Febantel suspension may be used in combination with trichlorfon oral liquid in accordance with the provisions of § 520.2520c, this section, and the following conditions: ( 1 ) Combine 1 part febantel suspension with 5 parts trichlorfon liquid.
( 2 ) Allow animal to consume a portion of daily grain ration; administer mixture by stomach tube at rate of 18 milliliters per 100 pounds of body weight.
[45 FR 8587, Feb. 8, 1980, as amended at 79 FR 28821, May 20, 2014; 86 FR 14818, Mar. 19, 2021]
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Women's Employment in War Industries

              																								United States. Women's Bureau.						"Women's Factory Employment in an Expanding Aircraft Production Program : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 189-1" in *Women's Employment in War Industries : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 189*			(1942).						https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5462/item/539647, accessed on September 25, 2024.	    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
### Fresh and saline ground-water zones in the Punjab region, West Pakistan

By: W.V. Swarzenski

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1608I

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
# MLO_sh2_chem_datatable
Office for Domestic Preparedness 

U.S. Department of Homeland Security 

Washington, DC 20531

ODP Information Bulletin

No. 184, August 10, 2005

TO: All State Administrative Agency Heads 

All State Administrative Agency Points of Contact 

FROM: Matt A. Mayer 

 Acting Executive Director 

SUBJECT: Updates to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Fiscal Year 2005 Transit 

Security Grant Program Guidelines and Application Kit 

The Fiscal Year 2005 Transit Security Grant Program (TSGP) application kit was released on April 5, 

2005. This information bulletin provides several important clarifications and updates to that guidance. 

Allowable training-related costs under SLGCP grant programs include: 1) establishment of chemical, 

biological, radiological, nuclear, and explosives (CBRNE) terrorism and cyber security training programs 

through existing training academies, universities or junior colleges; and 2) overtime and backfill costs 

associated with attendance at ODP-sponsored and approved CBRNE and cyber security training courses. 

TSGP funds may be used for the following training activities: 

Overtime and backfill funding for emergency preparedness and response personnel attending 

ODP-sponsored and approved training – Payment of overtime expenses will be for work performed by 

award (SAA) or sub-award employees in excess of the established work week (usually 40 hours). 

Further, overtime payments and backfill costs associated with sending personnel to training are allowable, 

provided that it is ODP-sponsored training. These costs are allowed only to the extent the payment for 

such services is in accordance with the policies of the grantee or sub-grantee. Dual compensation is not 

allowed. An employee may not receive compensation from their unit or agency AND from a grant for the 

same period of time (e.g., 1:00 pm to 5:00 pm). Fringe benefits on overtime hours are limited to Federal 

Insurance Contributions Act (FICA), Workers’ Compensation and Unemployment Compensation. 

For more information on ODP-sponsored training, please visit the following web page: 

http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/odp/training.htm . 

If you have any question about the FY 05 TSGP, please email tsgp@dhs.gov or call the ODP Centralized 

Scheduling & Information Desk at 1-800-368-6498.
#### § 1316.67 Final order.

As soon as practicable after the presiding officer has certified the record to the Administrator, the Administrator shall cause to be published in the Federal Register his final order in the proceeding, which shall set forth the final rule and the findings of fact and conclusions of law upon which the rule is based. This order shall specify the date on which it shall take effect, which date shall not be less than 30 days from the date of publication in the Federal Register unless the Administrator finds that the public interest in the matter necessitates an earlier effective date, in which event the Administrator shall specify in the order his findings as to the conditions which led him to conclude that an earlier effective date was required.

[44 FR 42179, July 19, 1979, as amended at 44 FR 55332, Sept. 26, 1979]
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2012-0331 Directorate Identifier: 2011-NM-119-AD 

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell. 

Estimated Costs: 

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance) Action 

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement) 

Do not include oncondition costs here 

Work-hours 

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up) 

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our) 

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts) 

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet 

Inspection 5.0 $ 425.00 $0 $ 425.00 0 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance: 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 0 

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $ 

On-Condition Costs:

Action 

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement) 

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup) 

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour) 

Parts Cost Cost per Product 

Replacement 24.0 $2,040.00 $32,273 $34,313.20

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): 
Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
# L_2020030EN.01000101.xml

| 3.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 30/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 30/1

---

Corrigendum to Council Decision (EU) 2019/1815 of 24 October 2019 appointing two members and three alternate members, proposed by the Republic of Slovenia, of the Committee of the Regions

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 278 of 30 October 2019
  )

On page 12, in Article 1, point (b), first indent:

for:

| ‘— | Mr Aleksander Saša ARESNOVIČ, župan Mestne občine Maribor,’, |
| --- | --- |

‘—

Mr Aleksander Saša ARESNOVIČ, župan Mestne občine Maribor,’,

read:

| ‘— | Mr Aleksander Saša ARSENOVIČ, župan Mestne občine Maribor,’. |
| --- | --- |

‘—

Mr Aleksander Saša ARSENOVIČ, župan Mestne občine Maribor,’.

---
Exhibit








EXHBIT 10.1


FIRST AMENDMENT
TO
WASHINGTON TRUST BANCORP, INC.
2003 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN, AS AMENDED AND RESTATED
A.The Washington Trust Bancorp, Inc. 2003 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated (the “Plan”) is hereby amended by deleting Section 15(b) in its entirety and substituting therefor the following:


“(b)    Payment in Stock.  Subject to approval by the Administrator, a grantee may elect to have the Company’s tax withholding obligation satisfied, in whole or in part, by authorizing the Company to withhold from shares of Stock to be issued pursuant to any Award a number of shares with an aggregate Fair Market Value (as of the date the withholding is effected) that would satisfy the withholding amount due; provided, however, that to the extent necessary to avoid adverse accounting treatment such share withholding may be limited to the minimum required tax withholding obligation.  The Administrator may also require Awards to be subject to mandatory share withholding up to the required withholding amount.  For purposes of share withholding, the Fair Market Value of withheld shares shall be determined in the same manner as the value of Stock includible in income of the Participants.”
B.This First Amendment shall be effective April 3, 2017.
C.Except as otherwise amended herein, the Plan is hereby confirmed in all other respects.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this First Amendment to be executed this 3rd day of April, 2017.
WASHINGTON TRUST BANCORP, INC.
By:     /s/ Joseph J. MarcAurele        
Joseph J. MarcAurele
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
#### § 520.1120 Haloxon oral dosage forms.
ADDENDUM TO:

DRAFT EPA NEW ENGLAND REGIONAL 

CLIMATE ADAPTATION PLAN

NOVEMBER 6, 2013
Update to p.21: 

The Connecticut Climate Change Preparedness Plan was finalized in July 2013. This final plan is 

accessible at 

http://www.ct.gov/deep/lib/deep/climatechange/connecticut_climate_preparedness_plan_201

1.pdf

Update to p. 23: 

Final Connecticut Climate Change Preparedness Plan, 2013, is accessible at: 

http://www.ct.gov/deep/lib/deep/climatechange/connecticut_climate_preparedness_plan_201

1.pdf

The Impacts of Climate Change on Connecticut Agriculture, Infrastructure, Natural Resources and 

Public Health, 2010 is accessible at: 

http://www.ct.gov/deep/lib/deep/climatechange/impactsofclimatechange.pdf

Update to p. 65, reference 67:

Maine’s Climate Future: an Initial Assessment, 2009, is accessible at:

http://climatechange.umaine.edu/files/Maines_Climate_Future.pdf
§ 520.434 Chlorphenesin carbamate tablets. ( a ) *Specifications.* Each tablet contains 400 milligrams of chlorphenesin carbamate.
( b ) *Sponsor.* See No. 054771 in § 510.600(c) of this chapter.
( c ) *Conditions of use in dogs* — ( 1 ) *Amount.* 50 milligrams per pound of body weight on first day; 25 milligrams per pound of body weight each following day. Divide total daily dose into 2 or 3 equal doses—administer at 12- or 8-hour intervals.
( 2 ) *Indications for use.* For use as an adjunct to therapy of acute inflammatory and traumatic conditions of skeletal muscles. The drug provides relief of the signs of discomfort associated with myositis, muscle sprains, traumatic injuries, stifle injuries—especially when administered before or after surgery—and invertebral disc syndrome (can be used concurrently with adrenal corticosteroids).
( 3 ) *Limitations.* Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian.
[44 FR 16009, Mar. 16, 1979, as amended at 79 FR 28819, May 20, 2014]
§ 520.622c Diethylcarbamazine citrate chewable tablets. ( a ) *Specifications.* Each chewable tablet contains 30, 45, 60, 120, 150, or 180 milligrams of diethylcarbamazine citrate.
( b ) *Sponsors.* See drug listing nos. in § 510.600(c) of this chapter for identification of sponsors as follows: ( 1 ) [Reserved]
( 2 ) For 054771, use of 60, 120, or 180 milligram tablets as in paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of this section.
( 3 ) For 061690, use of 45 or 150 milligram tablets as in paragraph (c)(2)(iii) of this section.
( 4 ) For 061133, use of 60-, 120-, or 180-milligram tablets as in paragraph (c)(2)(i) of this section.
( 5 ) For 000061, use of 60-milligram tablets as in paragraph (c)(2)(i) of this section.
( 6 ) For 069043, use of 30, 60, 120, or 180 milligram tablets as in paragraph (c)(2)(i) of this section.
( c ) *Conditions of use* — ( 1 ) *Amount.* 3 milligrams per pound of body weight per day for prevention of heartworm disease and control of ascarids; 25 to 50 milligrams per pound of body weight as an aid in treatment of ascarid infections.
( 2 ) *Indications for use.* ( i ) For prevention of heartworm disease (*Dirofilaria immitis*) in dogs; as an aid in control of ascarids (*Toxocara canis*) in dogs; as an aid in treatment of ascarid (*Toxocara canis* and *Toxascaris leonina*) infections in dogs and cats.
( ii ) For prevention of infection with *Dirofilaria immitis* (heartworm disease) in dogs; as an aid in treatment of ascarid (*Toxocara canis* and *Toxascaris leonina*) infections in dogs.
( iii ) For prevention of heartworm disease (*Dirofilaria immitis*) in dogs.
( 3 ) *Limitations.* Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian.
[43 FR 6941, Feb. 17, 1978] Editorial Note
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations affecting § 520.622c, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*