alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-  Home 
-  Education and Training Services Resource Guide 

# Education and Training Services Resource Guide

## Education and Training Services Resource Guide - 2023/2024

According to the latest data released by the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), education-related travel exports ranked 9th among service exports in 2022. During the 2021/2022 academic year the U.S. hosted nearly one million international students and reported $37.68* billion in education-related travel exports, which supported over 335,423 U.S. jobs. U.S. colleges and universities play an important role in helping foreign governments partner with private industry to fulfill vital education and training needs.  Globally, it is expected that education will be a $7 trillion industry by 2025. 

Education is an important element of our trade relationships with countries worldwide. Promoting study in the United States strengthens our economic development through innovation, workforce development, and attracting foreign direct investment. There are enormous challenges and opportunities for U.S. international education around the world.  In 2019, the Commercial Service launched USA: A Study Destination to assist the U.S. international education industry to compete. In 2022, U.S. international education was included in the U.S. Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration National Export Strategy.  Increasing trade and investment opportunities for U.S. educational institutions and entities is, therefore, a priority at the U.S. Department of Commerce’s International Trade Administration.  

This 2023/2024 bi-annual Education and Training Services Resource Guide is an important tool to assist U.S. institutions with identifying new international market opportunities. The Guide provides a detailed analysis of the education sector in 60 countries, covering trends, demand and more. This new edition contains information on digital marketing outreach strategies and scholarships.  It also includes comparable market assessments of countries listed as best prospects for U.S. training and educational services to make it easy for institutions to see which markets represent the greatest opportunities for their specific programs. The country assessments are based on the expert observations and market research reports created by U.S. Commercial Service education sector specialists worldwide. For additional information or education market research, please visit https://www.trade.gov/education-industry

**Gabriela Zelaya**Global Education Team LeaderGabriela.Zelaya@trade.gov

### The Education & Training Resource Guide - 2023/2024

This 2023/2024 U.S. Commercial Service Education and Training Services Resource Guide includes comparable and individual market assessments of countries listed as best prospects for U.S. training and educational services. The country assessments are based on observations and market research reports created by the U.S. Commercial Service.

Please use the country list below to find information on the education market(s) that your company is targeting. 

**Education & Training Resource Guide: Analysis By Market**
---

---

Exhibit 14.2



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements of NUR Macroprinters Ltd. on Form S-8 (File Nos.
333-102288 and 333-92491) and Form F-3 (File Nos. 333-115826, 333-114428, 333-47842 and
333-92493) of our report dated May 2, 2006 relating to the financial statements of NUR
Asia Pacific Limited for the year ended December, 31, 2005 with respect to the
Consolidated Financial Statements of NUR Macroprinters Ltd., included in its Annual Report
on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005.

|/s/ BDO McCabe Lo & CompanyBDO McCabe Lo & CompanyCertified Public AccountantsJuly 12, 2006
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
§ 516.1 Scope. ( a ) This part implements section 573 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. 360ccc-2) and contains the following subparts: ( 1 ) Subpart A—General Provisions.
( 2 ) Subpart B—Designation of a Minor Use or Minor Species New Animal Drug.
( 3 ) Subpart C [Reserved]
( 4 ) Subpart D [Reserved]
( b ) References in this part to regulatory sections of the Code of Federal Regulations are to Chapter I of Title 21, unless otherwise noted.
§ 507.34 Preventive controls. ( a ) ( 1 ) You must identify and implement preventive controls to provide assurances that any hazards requiring a preventive control will be significantly minimized or prevented and the animal food manufactured, processed, packed, or held by your facility will not be adulterated under section 402 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act; and
( 2 ) Preventive controls required by paragraph (a)(1) of this section include: ( i ) Controls at critical control points (CCPs), if there are any CCPs; and
( ii ) Controls, other than those at CCPs, that are also appropriate for animal food safety.
( b ) Preventive controls must be written.
( c ) Preventive controls include, as appropriate to the facility and animal food: ( 1 ) Process controls. Process controls include procedures, practices, and processes to ensure the control of parameters during operations such as heat processing, irradiating, and refrigerating animal food. Process controls must include, as appropriate to the nature of the applicable control and its role in the facility's food safety system: ( i ) Parameters associated with the control of the hazard; and
( ii ) The maximum or minimum value, or combination of values, to which any biological, chemical, or physical parameter must be controlled to significantly minimize or prevent a hazard requiring a process control.
( 2 ) Sanitation controls. Sanitation controls include procedures, practices, and processes to ensure that the facility is maintained in a sanitary condition adequate to significantly minimize or prevent hazards such as environmental pathogens and biological hazards due to employee handling. Sanitation controls must include, as appropriate to the facility and the animal food, procedures, practices, and processes for the: ( i ) Cleanliness of animal food-contact surfaces, including animal food-contact surfaces of utensils and equipment; and
( ii ) Prevention of cross-contamination from insanitary objects and from personnel to animal food, animal food-packaging material, and other animal food-contact surfaces and from raw product to processed product.
( 3 ) Supply-chain controls. Supply-chain controls include the supply-chain program as required by subpart E of this part;
( 4 ) A recall plan as required by § 507.38; and
( 5 ) Other preventive controls. These include any other procedures, practices, and processes necessary to satisfy the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section. Examples of other controls include hygiene training and other current good manufacturing practices.
Editorial Note on Part 179
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 179 appear at 70 FR 72074, Dec. 1, 2005.

§ 179.25 General provisions for food irradiation. For the purposes of § 179.26, current good manufacturing practice is defined to include the following restrictions: ( a ) Any firm that treats foods with ionizing radiation shall comply with the requirements of parts 110 and 117 of this chapter and other applicable regulations.
( b ) Food treated with ionizing radiation shall receive the minimum radiation dose reasonably required to accomplish its intended technical effect and not more than the maximum dose specified by the applicable regulation for that use.
( c ) Packaging materials subjected to irradiation incidental to the radiation treatment and processing of prepackaged food shall be in compliance with § 179.45, shall be the subject of an exemption for such use under § 170.39 of this chapter, or shall be the subject of an effective premarket notification for a food contact substance for such use submitted under § 170.100 of this chapter.
( d ) Radiation treatment of food shall conform to a scheduled process. A scheduled process for food irradiation is a written procedure that ensures that the radiation dose range selected by the food irradiation processor is adequate under commercial processing conditions (including atmosphere and temperature) for the radiation to achieve its intended effect on a specific product and in a specific facility. A food irradiation processor shall operate with a scheduled process established by qualified persons having expert knowledge in radiation processing requirements of food and specific for that food and for that irradiation processor's treatment facility.
( e ) A food irradiation processor shall maintain records as specified in this section for a period of time that exceeds the shelf life of the irradiated food product by 1 year, up to a maximum of 3 years, whichever period is shorter, and shall make these records available for inspection and copy by authorized employees of the Food and Drug Administration. Such records shall include the food treated, lot identification, scheduled process, evidence of compliance with the scheduled process, ionizing energy source, source calibration, dosimetry, dose distribution in the product, and the date of irradiation.
[51 FR 13399, Apr. 18, 1986, as amended at 67 FR 9585, Mar. 4, 2002; 67 FR 35731, May 21, 2002; 80 FR 56168, Sept. 17, 2015]
§ 349.70 Labeling of ophthalmic hypertonicity drug products. ( a ) *Statement of identity.* The labeling of the product contains the established name of the drug, if any, and identifies the product as a “hypertonicity” (select one of the following: “eye” or “ophthalmic”) “(insert dosage form, e.g., drops).”
( b ) *Indications.* The labeling of the product states, under the heading “Indications,” the following phrase: “For the temporary relief of corneal edema.”
( c ) *Warnings.* In addition to the warnings in § 349.50, the labeling of the product contains the following warnings under the heading “Warnings” for products containing any ingredient identified in § 349.16: ( 1 ) “Do not use this product except under the advice and supervision of a doctor. If you experience eye pain, changes in vision, continued redness or irritation of the eye, or if the condition worsens or persists, consult a doctor.”
( 2 ) “This product may cause temporary burning and irritation on being instilled into the eye.”
( 3 ) “If solution changes color or becomes cloudy, do not use.”
( d ) *Directions.* The labeling of the product contains the following information under the heading “Directions”: Instill 1 or 2 drops in the affected eye(s) every 3 or 4 hours, or as directed by a doctor.
§ 520.1204 Kanamycin, bismuth subcarbonate, activated *attapulgite.* ( a ) *Specifications.* ( 1 ) Each 5 milliliters (mL) of suspension contains 100 milligrams (mg) kanamycin (as the sulfate), 250 mg bismuth subcarbonate, and 500 mg activated attapulgite (aluminum magnesium silicate).
( 2 ) Each tablet contains 100 mg kanamycin (as the sulfate), 250 mg bismuth subcarbonate, and 500 mg activated attapulgite.
( b ) *Sponsor.* See No. 054771 in § 510.600(c) of this chapter.
( c ) *Conditions of use in dogs* — ( 1 ) *Amount.* 5 mL of suspension or 1 tablet per 20 pounds body weight every 8 hours. Maximum dose: 5 mL of suspension or 3 tablets every 8 hours. Dogs under 10 pounds: 2.5 mL of suspension or 1 ⁄ 2 tablet every 8 hours. A recommended initial loading dose should be twice the amount of a single dose.
( 2 ) *Indications for use.* For the treatment of bacterial enteritis caused by organisms susceptible to kanamycin and the symptomatic relief of the associated diarrhea.
( 3 ) *Limitations.* Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian.
[40 FR 13838, Mar. 27, 1975, as amended at 53 FR 27851, July 25, 1988; 56 FR 8710, Mar. 1, 1991; 64 FR 403, Jan. 5, 1999; 71 FR 43968, Aug. 3, 2006; 78 FR 28822, May 20, 2014]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than January 27, 2010.

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago**                     (Colette A. Fried, Assistant Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:                

*1. John E. Helgerson*, Ottumwa, Iowa; to acquire additional shares of Hedrick Bancorp, Inc., Hedrick, Iowa, and thereby indirectly acquire additional voting shares of Hedrick Savings Bank, Ottumwa, Iowa.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 7, 2010.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2010-363 Filed 1-11-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
Exhibit 99.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hutton Investors Futures Fund L.P. II
(the  "Partnership")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending June 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Daniel R.  McAuliffe,  Jr.,  Chief  Financial  Officer and  Director of Smith
Barney  Futures  Management  LLC,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Partnership.

/s/ Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr.
Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr.
Smith Barney Futures Management LLC
Chief Financial Officer and Director
August 14, 2002
#### Nancy L. JOHNSTON (substituted for William F. Johnston), Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent.

No. 04-3260.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Nov. 17, 2005.

John H. Williamson, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, filed a petition for rehearing for respondent. With him on the petition were Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, David M. Cohen, Director, and William F. Ryan, Assistant Director. Of counsel on the petition was Jill Gerstenfeld, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, Office of Personnel Management, of Washington, DC.

Nancy L. Johnston (for William F. Johnston), of Seaford, Delaware, pro se.

Before NEWMAN, CLEVENGER, and, BRYSON, Circuit Judges.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

*ORDER*

*A*petition for rehearing having been filed by the respondent, Office of Personnel Management,

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The petition for rehearing is granted for the limited purpose of modifying the opinion issued on June 28, 2005. The precedential order modifying the opinion is attached.

(2) The mandate of the court will issue on November 25, 2005.

ON RECONSIDERATION

The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) has requested amendment of the court’s opinion, reported at *Johnston v. OPM,*413 F.3d 1339 (Fed.Cir.2005), to clarify that the duty to notify Mr. Johnston of his separation and eligibility for disability retirement belonged primarily to the agency that employed Mr. Johnston, rather than OPM. We agree that clarification is warranted. Accordingly, the opinion is modified as follows (with emphases added to show the changes made):

*137741B F.3d at 1342, second full paragraph, first sentence is changed to read: “OPM bears the burden of showing that the requisite notice was sent *by the agency.”*

413 F.3d at 1342, third full paragraph, first sentence is changed to read: “The Board ignored the burden on OPM to show that notice was given *by the agency,*and

413 F.3d at 1343, first paragraph, last sentence is changed to read: “The burden is on OPM to establish *compliance*with the statutory and regulatory requirements

413 F.3d 1343, final paragraph, second sentence is changed to read: “... as to whether or when *the agency*sent or Mr. Johnson received ...

No costs.
No. 68762 

# FILED
JAN 14 . 2016 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

MICHAEL THOMAS LITTLE, Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE ROB BARE, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and STEVEN GRIERSON, CLERK FO THE DISTRICT COURT, Real Party in Interest.



### ORDER DENYING PETITION This is a pro se petition for a writ of certiorari, writ of prohibition and writ of mandamus.

Petitioner Michael Little argues that there was insufficient evidence to support his misdemeanor convictions, the complaint contained the wrong code, and his due process rights were violated because the State did not agree to a continuance on the date of trial despite someone informing him by telephone that they would agree to a continuance. These claims were not cognizable in a petition for a writ of certiorari as NRS 34.020(3) limits this court's review of a misdemeanor appeal to challenges to the constitutionality or validity of the statute or ordinance passed upon by the district court.

Regarding Little's claim that the clerk of the district court should be directed to cease issuing remittiturs from misdemeanor appealsprior to entry of a written order, this claim is moot as the prematurelyissued remittiturs in this case were stricken by the court, and we are

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A ottro 

# 6 

# -no-8Pickering 

# to, J.

confident that the clerk of the court will henceforth recognize that a remittitur from a misdemeanor appeal should issue only after entry of a signed, written order resolving the appeal.

Regarding Little's request that Judge Bare be directed to recall the prematurely-issued remittiturs, this request is moot. The prematurely-issued remittiturs were stricken by the court. In a supplement to his petition, Little complains that Judge Bare erred inissuing signed, written orders before actually striking the prematurelyissued remittiturs. We have considered this claim, and we conclude that judicial economy and sound judicial administration militate against issuing a writ to correct this alleged error.' 

### See Redeker 1.). Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 122 Nev. 164, 167, 127 P.3d 520, 522 (2006). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED. 

# Ci t a!

Saitta

cc: Hon. Rob Bare, District Judge Michael Thomas Little Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk 'We further deny Little's request that the district court receive procedural training regarding the processing of misdemeanor appeals.

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2

(0) 1947A
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1995, AND THE RELATED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR THEN ENDED, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS 
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           5,996
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,169
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,613
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,745
<PP&E>                                           5,303
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,780
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  84,770
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,455
<BONDS>                                         23,278
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           123
<OTHER-SE>                                      39,031
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    84,770
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               174,674
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  155,367
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,496
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,811
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (17,802)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             31,613
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (1,963)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (400)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    29,250
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.99
        

</TABLE>