! !!!2 

Protection Agency 

April 29, 2016 

John R. Kasich, Governor 

Mary Taylor, Lt. Governor 

Craig W. Butler, Director 

George Czerniak, Director 

Attention: Bilal Qazzaz 

Air and Radiation Division 

U.S.EPA, Region V 

77 West Jackson Boulevard 

Chicago, Illinois 60604 

RE: 2015 SLAMS Data Certification 

Dear Mr. Czerniak: 

CERTIFIED MAIL 

At this time we are certifying Ohio's ambient monitoring data. Please find enclosed our 

SLAMS Reports (AMP-450NC for PMc and AMP-600) for calendar year 2015 as required in 40 

CFR, Part 58, Section 58.15. The ambient concentration and the quality assurance data for 

these sites have been completely submitted to the AQS database. 

I certify that the data in the report are accurate to the best of our knowledge taking into 

consideration the quality assurance findings and only to the extent of the activities performed 

by Ohio EPA. 

There were no incidents of air pollution that reached or exceeded levels as specified by 

Section 51.151 which could cause significant harm to the health of persons. 

Sincerely, 

Robert Hodanbosi 

Chief, Division of Air Pollution Control 

Enclosure 

50 West Town Street • Suite 700 • P.O. Box 1049 • Columbus, OH 43216-1049 

epa.ohio.gov • (614) 644-3020 • (614) 644-3184 (fax) 
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

CERTIFICATION EVALUATION AND CONCURRENCE 

3 Report Code: AMP600 

GEOGRAPHIC SELECTIONS 

Tribal 

Code State County Sit:e Parameter POC City AQCR UAR 

39 

ECTIONS 

er Method 

OPTIONS 

A 

nd Date 

5 

Duration 

Option Value 

YES 

CERTIFYING 

Selection Criteria Page 1 

CBSA CSA 

EPA 

Region 

Apr. 29, 2016 
Data Evaluation and Concurrence Report Summary Apr. 29, 2016 

2015 

 National Park Service (0745) 

me 

ce 

r all pollutants: 

eter 

AQS Site-10 

39-121-8001 

39-121-8001 

39-121-8001 

Code 

42401 1 

Monitors 

Evaluated 

Monitors Recommended for Monitors NOT Recommended 

Concurrence by AQS for Concurrence by AQS 

0 1 

PQAO Code TSA Date 

0745 

AQS Cert. Agency 

Recommended Recommended 

POC Flag Flag Reason for AQS Recommendation 

N 

N 

N 

Annual Summary completeness < 70%. 

Annual Performance Evaluation Audit Missing or 1 Level. 

OrganizationRepresentative: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 

Pag e 1 o f 4 
Data Evaluation and Concurrence Report Summary Apr. 29, 2016 

2015 

Ohio EPA Central Office (1256) 

me 

M/FEM 

02) 

m STP 

ditions 

& Assoc., MO 

O 

QAO 

QAO 

 all pollutants: 

Code 

42101 

14129 

85129 

42602 

44201 

81102 

88101 

42401 

AQS 

Monitors 

Evaluated 

14 

24 

2 

7 

48 

50 

74 

34 

Monitors Recommended for 

Concurrence by AQS 

14 

23 

2 

6 

47 

50 

70 

32 

PQAO Code 

1299 

TSA Date 

1373 

1453 09/21/15 

1454 

1455 

Cert. Agency 

Monitors NOT Recommended 

for Concurrence by AQS 

0 

0 

1 

1 

0 

4 

2 

eter Recommended Recommended 

AQS Site-ID POC 

-

39-003-0009 

39-049-0037 

39-013-3002 

39-1 03-0004 

39-035-0060 

39-027-1002 

39-061-0006 

39-061-0040 

39-091-0006 

39-027-1 002 

2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

1 

1 

Flag Flag 

N N 

N N 

N N 

N N 

N N 

N N 

N N 

N N 

N N 

N N 

Page 2 of 4 

Reason for AQS Recommendation 

Flow Rate Audit completeness< 65%. 

Annual Performance Evaluation Audit Missing or 1 Level. 

Annual Performance Evaluation Audit Missing or 1 Level. 

Flow Rate Audit Bias > 6%. 

PQAO-Level Collocation criteria not met. 

Annual Performance Evaluation Audit Missing or 1 Level. 

Flow Rate Audit completeness < 65%. 

Annual Summary completeness < 70%. 

Flow Rate Audit completeness < 65%. 

1-Point QC Completeness < 65%. 
Data Evaluation and Concurrence Report Summary Apr. 29, 2016 

 Organization Representative: ~~ 

Page 3 of 4 
Data Evaluation and Concurrence Report Summary Apr. 29, 2016 

2015 

USEPA- Clean Air Markets Division (1344) 

Monitors Monitors Recommended for Monitors NOT Recommended 

me Code Evaluated Concurrence by AQS for Concurrence by AQS 

44201 3 3 0 

PQAO Code TSA Date 

 Markets Division 1344 

 all pollutants: AQS rt. Agency 

eter Recommended Reco ed 

AQS Site-10 POC Flag Flag 

 Organization Representative: ------------------~-=-------

Page 4 of 4 
Data Evaluation and Concurrence Report for Gaseous Pollutants 

2015 

National Park Service (07 45) 

Sulfur dioxide 

National Park Service (07 45) 

06/06/2007 

Number of Passed Audits NPAP Bias Criteria Met 

utine Data 

Min 

2015 

Max Exceed. Outlier Perc. 

Count Count Comp. 

e Ohio EPA Central Office (1256) 

--· - -·. ···-· . ._.,. .. __ ·-.-. . .. 

Central Ohio PQAO (1453) 

Number of Passed Audits NPAP Bias 

utine Data 

Min Max Exceed. Outlier Perc. 

Count Count Comp. 

0.000 0.700 0 0 99 

0.000 2.200 0 0 99 

0.000 2.200 0 0 98 

North East Ohio PQAO (1454) 

Number of Passed Audits NPAP Bias 

2 2.43955 

utine Data 

Min Max Exceed. Outlier Perc. 

Count Count Comp. 

- 0.100 6.300 0 0 94 

y 

One Point Quality Check 

Precision Bias Complete 

Criteria Met 

y 

One Point Quality Check 

Precision Bias Complete 

0.73 +1 .38 100 

1.54 -3.25 100 

3.26 +/-2.78 100 

Criteria Met 

y 

One Point Quality Check 

Precision Bias Complete 

3.46 +5.62 96 

-

Annual PE NPAP 

Bias Complete Bias 

Annual PE NPAP 

Bias Complete Bias PQAO Level 

Criteria 

5.83 100 y 

I 

1.15 100 y 

0.14 100 y I 

Annual PE NPAP 

Bias Complete Bias PQAO Level 

Criteria 

4.07 100 3.12 y 

- -

QAPP 

Appr. 

y 

y 

y 

QAPF 

Appr. 

y 

Concur. Flag 

Aqs Rec CA Rec Epa 

Flag Flag Concur 

Concur. Flag 

Aqs Rec CA Rec Epa 

Flag Flag Concur 

y y s 

y y s 

y y s 

Concur. Flag 

Aqs Rec CA Rec Epa 

Flag Flag Concur 

y y s 
Data Evaluation and Concurrence Report for Gaseous Pollutants 

2015 

e Ohio EPA Central Office (1256) 

- - ·-- ·· ·· ·- · ·--··-- ·-.-. u-r- ... 

North East Ohio PQAO (1454) 

utine Data One Point Quality Check Annual PE NPAP Concur. Flag 

Min Max Exceed. Outlier Perc. Precision Bias Complete Bias Complete Bias PQAO Level QAPI' Aqs Rec CARec Epa 

Count Count Comp. Criteria Appr. Flag Flag Concur 

0.000 2.237 0 0 93 3.24 +/-2.53 100 3.21 100 y y y y s 

., 

0.000 1.125 0 0 93 4.98 +/-3.82 96 - 3.92 100 ' y y y I y s ·~ l 

0.000 1.800 0 0 99 1.68 +/-1 .63 100 - 2.40 100 .. y y y y s II l 

0.000 3.500 0 0 98 3.79 +5.45 85 4.00 100 y r y y y s L 

- 0.100 1.300 0 0 99 4.88 +/-3.57 88 2.57 100 y r y y y I s 

I ' 

0.000 2.600 0 0 95 3.27 +/-2.63 83 - 5.50 100 1.76 y ' y y y s - -' - ~ 

South West Ohio PQAO (1455) 

Number of Passed Audits NPAP Bias Criteria Met 

1 4.75880 y 

utine Data One Point Quality Check Annual PE NPAP Concur. Flag 

Min Max Exceed. Outlier Perc. Precision Bias Complete Bias Complete Bias PQAO Level QAPP Aqs Rec CA Rec Epa 

Count Count Comp. Criteria Appr. Flag Flag Concur 

0.072 1.216 0 0 89 5.86 +/-5.09 88 1.48 100 y y y y s 

0 .071 2.575 0 0 99 5.90 +/-5.15 96 - 3.26 100 y y y y s 

0.000 1.700 0 0 99 4.49 +/-4.36 100 0.52 100 4.76 y y y y s 

0.010 1.310 0 0 94 8.30 +/-6.56 92 - 4.13 100 y y y y s 
Data Evaluation and Concurrence Report for Gaseous Pollutants 

2015 

e Ohio EPA Central Office (1256) 

- - - - - - -

---- \.rr-, 

Central Ohio PQAO (1453) 

Number of Passed Audits NPAP Bias Criteria Met 

y 

utine Data One Point Quality Check AnnuaiPE NPAP Concur. Flag 

Min Max Exceed. Outlier Perc. Precision Bias Complete Bias Complete Bias PQAO Level QAPF Aqs Rec CARec Epa 

Count Count Comp. Criteria Appr. Flag Flag Concur 

0.0 48.0 0 95 2.21 +/-1 .83 100 3.01 100 y y y y s 

, 

0.0 54.0 0 94 5.35 -5.23 100 0 y I y N N s 

L 

0.0 58.0 0 95 4.24 +/-4.81 100 - 2.92 100 - y y y ; . y s 

- - -

----- ' 

North East Ohio PQAO (1454) 

Number of Passed Audits NPAP Bias Criteria Met 

y 

utine Data One Point Quality Check Annual PE NPAP Concur. Flag 

Min Max Exceed. Outlier Perc. Precision Bias Complete Bias Complete Bias PQAO Level QAPP Aqs Rec CA Rec Epa 

Count Count Comp. Criteria Appr. Flag Flag Concur 

0.0 58.0 0 93 3.84 +/-3.33 100 - 14.52 100 y y y y s 

0.0 59.0 0 86 6.10 +/-5.82 85 6.07 100 y y y y s 

- - -

South West Ohio PQAO (1455) 

Number of Passed Audits NPAP Bias Criteria Met 

y 

utine Data One Point Quality Check Annual PE NPAP Concur. Flag 

Min Max Exceed. Outlier Perc. Precision Bias Complete Bias Complete Bias PQAO Level QAPP Aqs Rec CA Rec Epa 

Count Count Comp. Criteria Appr. Flag Flag Concur 

1.0 65.0 0 94 3.34 +/-2.68 100 - 6.64 100 y y y y s 

1.0 85.0 0 93 4.52 +/-3.63 100 - 5.62 100 y y y y s 

- - -
Data Evaluation and Concurrence Report for Gaseous Pollutants 

2015 

e Ohio EPA Central Office (1256) 

Ozone (44201} {~~m 

Central Ohio PQAO (1453) 

Number of Passed Audits NPAP Bias Criteria Met 

3 5.53954 y 

utine Data One Point Quality Check Annual PE NPAP Concur. Flag 

Min Max Exceed. Outlier Perc. Precision Bias Complete Bias Complete Bias PQAO Level QAPF' Aqs Rec CA Rec Epa 

Count Count Comp. Criteria Appr. Flag Flag Concur 

0.025 O.o76 0 0 95 - 1.94 +/-1 .58 100 - 0.01 - 100 y y y y s 

• I 

0.021 0.078 0 0 96 1.87 +/-1 .56 100 - 0.13 100 y y y y y s 

... 

~ 

0.019 0.082 0 0 95 1.27 +/-1.02 100 1.76 100 :::;:: y y y y s ! f 

0.01 3 0.073 0 0 95 1.97 +/-1 .81 100 0.40 100 y y y y s 

O.Q15 0.082 0 0 95 0.82 +1-0.70 100 - 0.28 100 5.54 y . y y y s 

0.018 0.078 0 0 96 6.59 +/-6.09 100 0.12 100 y ' y y y s 

0.022 0.085 0 0 94 1.87 +/-1.58 100 2.79 100 J) y y y y s 

0.022 0.076 0 0 95 3.04 -2.76 100 0.80 100 .i: y ' y y y s .., 

i 

0.015 0.072 0 0 94 3.37 -2.50 80 • 5.19 100 y y y y s 

c 

0.022 0.084 0 0 99 1.01 +1-0.88 87 0.78 100 1.97 y .. y y y s 

0.022 0.076 0 0 92 0.79 +/-0.85 87 2.02 100 y y y y s 

0.020 0.077 0 0 95 1.41 +/-1.1 5 100 1.05 100 y y y y s 

O.Q16 0.083 0 0 95 3.58 +/-2.95 100 1.77 100 6.37 y y y y s 

0.022 0.071 0 0 95 1.33 +/-1 .14 100 1.46 100 y y y y s 

North East Ohio PQAO (1454) 

Number of Passed Audits NPAP Bias Criteria Met 

5 6 .14353 y 

utine Data One Point Quality Check AnnuaiPE NPAP Concur. Flag 

Min Max Exceed. Outlier Perc. Precision Bias Complete Bias Complete Bias PQAO Level QAPF' Aqs Rec CA Rec Epa 

Count Count Comp. Criteria Appr. Flag Flag Concur 

0.024 0.092 0 0 94 1.61 +2.25 100 4.51 100 y y y y s 

0.019 0.075 0 0 96 2.10 +/-1.54 93 1.47 100 6.14 y y y y s 

0.006 0.077 0 0 93 0.90 +/-1.13 100 0.32 100 y y y y s 

- - -
Data Evaluation and Concurrence Report for Gaseous Pollutants 

2015 

e Ohio EPA Central Office (1256) 

--~ ·- . ·--. 

utine Data One Point Quality Check AnnuaiPE NPAP Concur. Flag 

Min Max Exceed. Outlier Perc. Precision Bias Complete Bias Complete Bias PQAO Level QAPP Aqs Rec CA Rec Epa 

Count Count Comp. Criteria Appr. Flag Flag Concur 

0.017 0.085 0 0 98 1.83 +/-1 .46 100 - 0.53 100 y y y y s 

0.020 0.080 0 0 99 1.83 +/-1.44 100 4.98 100 ;;.! ·! y y y y s 

0.025 0.086 0 0 100 2.80 +/-2.25 100 - 1.00 100 I y y y y s ~ I 

0.025 0.084 0 0 98 1.79 +/-1 .41 100 1.14 100 y I y y y s 

... 

; 

0.024 0.081 0 0 99 0 .79 +/-0.67 100 2.02 100 y y y y s 

0.020 0.070 0 0 95 3.75 +/-3.54 100 1.61 100 5.68 y ! ' y y y s 

0.015 0.076 0 0 93 1.55 +/-1 .21 87 10.57 100 4.26 y j y y y s 

0.021 0 .073 0 0 99 1.94 +/-1 .64 100 0.90 100 8.19 y I y y y s 

0.019 0 .071 0 0 95 1.38 +/-1 .14 100 2.25 100 y l y y y s 

' 

0.002 0.082 0 0 98 [ 2.87 +/-2.31 100 2.18 100 y y y ' y s t 

0.021 0 .077 0 0 98 1.27 +/-1.08 87 - 0.05 100 6.97 y , y y y s 

0.01 7 0.078 0 0 98 0.90 +/-0.70 93 1.35 100 y !I y y y s 

0.014 0.073 0 0 99 3.11 +/-2.43 100 - 0.02 100 I' y . y y y s 

0.023 0.079 0 ' 0 93 1.44 +/-1.13 100 1.62 100 y y y y s 

0.008 0.074 0 0 93 2.37 +/-1 .72 87 2.14 100 y y y y s 

South West Ohio PQAO (1455) 

Number of Passed Audits NPAP Bias Criteria Met 

4 2.67352 y 

utine Data One Point Quality Check Annual PE NPAP Concur. Flag 

Min Max Exceed. Outlier Perc. Precision Bias Complete Bias Complete Bias PQAO Level QAPF Aqs Rec CA Rec Epa 

Count Count Comp. Criteria Appr. Flag Flag Concur 

0.017 0.085 0 0 95 3.58 +/-2.98 100 4.04 100 y y y y s 

I 

0.018 0.082 0 0 100 2.16 +/-2.29 100 - 5.41 100 y y y y s 

0.020 0.086 0 0 100 I 1.97 +/-1 .47 87 0.49 100 y y y y s 

' 

0.019 0.086 0 0 100 0 .60 -2.19 87 - 0.67 100 y y y y s 

0.019 0.087 100 I 3.53 +/-3.02 100 100 4.66 y y y y s 0 0 - 1.85 

- - -
Data Evaluation and Concurrence Report for Gaseous Pollutants 

2015 

e Ohio EPA Central Office (1256) 

----· ·- \. ·--. . .. 

South West Ohio PQAO (1455) 

utine Data One Point Quality Check Annual PE NPAP Concur. Flag I 

Min Max Exceed. Outlier Perc. Precision Bias Complete Bias Complete Bias PQAO Level QAPF Aqs Rec CA Rec Epa 

Count Count Comp. Criteria Appr. Flag Flag Concur 

0.017 0.082 0 0 96 0 y y N I N s 

l"J ~ ! 

0.018 0 .086 0 0 100 2.15 +/-2.01 80 0.33 100 y J y y y s 

I '. • 

' 

0.017 0.090 0 0 98 2.47 +/-2.49 100 3.89 100 y 1 y y y s 

0 .017 0 .092 0 0 100 3.71 +/-3.54 100 4.29 100 2.10 y ) y y y s 

' 

0.005 0 .088 0 0 99 1.59 +/-1.74 100 0.14 100 y y y y s 

0.016 0.073 0 0 95 1.67 +/-1 .49 87 3.75 100 y ' y y y s 

O.Q1 5 0.081 0 0 95 1.84 +1 .98 87 2.27 100 0.89 y y y y s 

0.019 0.083 0 0 100 2.30 -2.07 87 - 2.86 100 y \ y y y s 

0.017 0.079 0 0 100 

I 

1.34 +/-1 .42 80 0.37 100 I y i y y y s 

0.009 0.077 0 0 100 0.89 +1.40 87 2.12 100 y I y y y ' I I s ' 

0.017 0.089 0 0 100 2.80 -3.62 100 1.59 100 3.25 y I y y I y s 

- --

- -
Data Evaluation and Concurrence Report for Gaseous Pollutants 

2015 

e Ohio EPA Central Office (1256) 

- - ·· - · -·-· ··-- ·- ·-. -

Central Ohio PQAO (1453) 

Number of Passed Audits NPAP Bias Criteria Met 

2 1.50871 y 

utine Data One Point Quality Check Annual PE NPAP Concur. Flag 

Min Max Exceed. Outlier Perc. Precision Bias Complete Bias Complete Bias PQAO Level QAPP Aqs Rec CARec Epa 

Count Count Comp. Criteria Appr. Flag Flag Concur 

0.0 30.0 0 96 4.41 +/-3.55 100 - 1.01 100 y y y y s 

.. I j 

0.0 21 .0 0 96 3.70 +/-2.89 100 - 4.97 100 l y y y y s ; 

0.0 49.0 0 96 4.46 +6.05 100 L 0 'I y ' y N . N s I . 

by site 39-013-0006 before audit was done 

f 

0.0 17.0 0 95 2.46 +/-2.22 100 - 2.20 100 2.01 y y y y s 

0.0 40.0 0 96 4.27 +/-3.46 100 - 0.85 100 1.00 y ; y y y s 

0.0 30.0 0 75 12.86 +/-7.58 100 2.82 100 y I y y y s 

0.0 52.0 0 94 4.03 +/-3.26 100 - 3.03 100 - y y y y s 

0.0 164.0 0 96 4.10 +/-3.39 100 • 4.26 ' 100 y f y y y s 

- -

North East Ohio PQAO (1454) 

Number of Passed Audits NPAP Bias Criteria Met 

3 6.68150 y 

utine Data One Point Quality Check AnnuaiPE NPAP Concur. Flag 

Min Max Exceed. Outlier Perc. Precision Bias Complete Bias Complete Bias PQAO Level QAPF Aqs Rec CA Rec Epa 

Count Count Comp. Criteria Appr. Flag Flag Concur 

0.0 58.0 0 96 3.05 +4.05 100 5.88 100 y y y y s 

0.0 29.0 0 95 2.66 +/-2.06 100 3.75 100 y y y y s 

0.0 75.0 0 97 3.29 -3.75 100 0.26 100 3.45 y y y y s 

0.0 51 .0 0 98 5.26 +/·5.63 96 • 4.17 100 y y y y s 

0.0 92.0 0 94 1.50 +/·1 .70 100 - 1.06 100 y y y y s 

- 0.1 86.7 0 94 1.85 +1-1.45 100 - 2.14 100 y y y I y s 

0.0 92.0 0 88 4.82 +/-3.61 100 1.32 100 y y y y s 

- 1.0 50.0 0 99 1.90 +/-1 .88 100 2.23 100 y y y y s 

-
Data Evaluation and Concurrence Report for Gaseous Pollutants 

2015 

e Ohio EPA Central Office (1256) 

North East Ohio PQAO (1454) 

utine Data One Point Quality Check Annual PE NPAP Concur. Flag 

Min Max Exceed. Outlier Perc. Precision Bias Complete Bias Complete Bias PQAO Level QAPP Aqs Rec CA Rec Epa 

Count Count Comp. Criteria Appr. Flag Flag Concur 

- 1.0 198.0 0 99 1.20 +/-0.91 100 4.64 100 6.68 y y y y s 

- 2.0 49.0 0 94 ! 1.60 +/-1.26 69 0.39 100 y I y y y s 

0.0 46.0 0 95 2.67 +/-2.03 92 3.53 100 y I y y y s j I 

- 1.0 39.0 0 95 2.56 +/-2.18 83 2.90 100 7.19 y y y y s 

-

- - -

Shell Engineering & Assoc., MO (1373) 

Number of Passed Audits NPAP Bias Criteria Met 

y 

utine Data One Point Quality Check Annual PE NPAP Concur. Flag 

Min Max Exceed. Outlier Perc. Precision Bias Complete Bias Complete Bias PQAO Level QAPP Aqs Rec CA Rec Epa 

Count Count Comp. Criteria Appr. Flag Flag Concur 

1.0 101 .0 0 95 0.93 +/-1 .05 96 - 3.11 100 y y y y s 

0.0 44.0 0 95 3.08 +/-2.15 100 - 2.90 100 , y y y y s 

South West Ohio PQAO (1455) 

Number of Passed Audits NPAP Bias Criteria Met 

2 2.90292 y 

utine Data One Point Quality Check Annual PE NPAP Concur. Flag 

Min Max Exceed. Outlier Perc. Precision Bias Complete Bias Complete Bias PQAO Level QAPF Aqs Rec CA Rec Epa 

Count Count Comp. Criteria Appr. Flag Flag Concur 

0.0 20.0 0 93 4.12 +/-3.10 96 - 2.66 100 y y y y s 

I 

- 2.0 102.0 0 94 2.35 +/-1 .93 100 - 5.49 100 y y y y s 

0.0 81 .0 0 99 2.65 +/-2.20 100 0.47 100 y y y y s 
Data Evaluation and Concurrence Report for Gaseous Pollutants 

2015 

e Ohio EPA Central Office (1256) 

--·· - · -·-· · ·-- \ · - ·- ., l l"'l"'-/ 

South West Ohio PQAO (1455) 

utine Data One Point Quality Check 

Min Max Exceed. Outlier Perc. Precision Bias Complete 

Count Count Comp. 

- 1.0 44.0 0 99 5.02 +/-4.62 100 

0.0 21 .0 0 100 3.73 +/-3.12 100 

- 1.0 67.0 0 99 

I 

1.43 +/-1 .73 100 

- 0.2 45.9 0 68 3.56 +/-3.02 77 

0.0 25.0 0 95 7.24 +/-4.34 96 

- 0.1 115.2 0 95 3 .. 22 +/-2.26 88 

- 1.0 28.0 0 94 I 3.53 +/-2.75 88 

-

URSCorp, TX (1299) 

02/27/2013 

Number of Passed Audits NPAP Bias Criteria Met 

y 

utine Data One Point Quality Check 

Min Max Exceed. Outlier Perc. Precision Bias Complete 

Count Count Comp. 

0.2 29.4 0 99 1.79 +8.63 73 

1.5 29.8 0 99 1.99 +3.08 69 

2015 

e 

USEPA- Clean Air Markets Division (1344) 

Ozone {44201) loom 

USEPA - Clean Air Markets Division (1344) 

10/02/2011 

Number of Passed Audits NPAP Bias Criteria Met 

16 2.51448 y 

utine Data One Point Quality Check 

Annual PE NPAP Concur. Flag 

Bias Complete Bias PQAO Level QAPF Aqs Rec CA Rec Epa 

Criteria Appr. Flag Flag Concur 

- 3.79 100 y y y y s 

0.86 100 y .. y y y s 

- 8 ' .56 100 3.78 y : y y y s 

0.65 100 y ' y N i N s 

- 9.95 100 2.03 y y y I y s 

I 

- 7.67 100 y .. y y y s 

- 8 .59 100 r y i· y y 1 y s 

- 1 -·- -

Annual PE NPAP Concur. Flag 

Bias Complete Bias PQAO Level QAPF Aqs Rec CA Rec Epa 

Criteria Appr. Flag Flag Concur 

1.84 100 y y y y s 

0.02 100 y y y y s 

Annual PE NPAP Concur. Flag 
Data Evaluation and Concurrence Report for Gaseous Pollutants 

2015 

e USEPA- Clean Air Markets Division (1344) 

-- --· ·- . ·-- . ... 

USEPA- Clean Air Markets Division (1344) 

10/02/2011 

utine Data One Point Quality Check Annual PE NPAP Concur. Flag 

Min Max Exceed. Outlier Perc. Precision Bias Complete Bias Complete Bias PQAO Level QAPF Aqs Rec CA Rec Epa 

Count Count Comp. Criteria Appr. Flag Flag Concur 

0.01 1 0.079 0 0 86 1.87 -2.99 100 - 1.66 100 y y y y s I 

0.016 0.079 0 0 93 1.90 +/-1.69 100 ~ - 0.14 100 5.54 y y y y s 

' 

0.012 0.086 0 0 94 1.04 -1 .22 100 - 0.83 100 y 1 y y y s 

- - - -
Data Evaluation and Concurrence Report for Particulate Matter 

PA Central Office (1256) 

otal 0-10um STP (81102) CONTINUOUS 

ast Ohio PQAO (1454) 

 Plan Approval Date: 

Routine Data (ug/m3) Flow Rate Verification Flow Rate Audit Col~ ce Flag 

or Exceed. Outlier % % % QAPP AQS RecCA Rec EPA 

Mean Min Max Count Count Complete Bias Complete Bias Complete 

~ 

Flag Flag Concur 

 31 .49 .0 420.0 0 99 +/-1 .00 100 -0.73 100 y y y s 

- - 

otal 0-10um STP (81102) CONTINUOUS 

West Ohio PQAO (1455) 

 Plan Approval Date: 

Routine Data (ug/m3) Flow Rate Verification Flow Rate Audit Col~ence Flag 

or Exceed. Outlier % % % QAPP AQS RecCA Rec EPA 

Mean Min Max Count Count Complete Bias Complete Bias Complete 

~ Flag Flag Concur 

 21.55 -1.0 122.0 0 97 -3.94 100 -2.27 100 y y y s 

otal 0-10um STP (81102) CONTINUOUS 

I 

rp, TX (1299) ! 

 Plan Approval Date: 02/27/2013 

Routine Data (ug/m3) Flow Rate Verification Flow Rate Audit 

Col~ence Flag 

or Exceed. Outlier % % % QAPP AQS Rec CA Rec EPA 

ean Min Max Count Count Complete Bias Complete Bias Complete 

~ 

Flag Flag Concur 

I 12.44 .0 321.0 0 99 +/-1.18 100 -1 .87 100 y y y s 

I 15.57 .0 325.0 0 98 -0.79 100 -1.24 100 y y y s 

I 13.66 .0 208.0 0 99 +/-1.14 100 -3.40 100 y y y s 
ata Evaluation and Concurrence Report for Particulate Matter 

PA Central Office (1256) 

otal 0-10um STP (81102) INTERMITTENT 

Ohio PQAO (1453) 

 Plan Approval Date: 

 

#Sites % CV Criteria 

Collocated Collocated Est CV UB Met? 

3 100 5.86 6.42 y 

Routine Data (ug/m3) Flow Rate Audit Collocation Concurrence Flag 

or Exceed. Outlier % % 

~ Mean Min Max Count Count~C~o~m~p~le~t~e~ L: ia == le ======

====~====i_~~-- ~~==== 

 22.00 3.0 39.0 0 

 

 

 

19.79 3.0 

24.62 7.0 

23.96 6.0 

21.42 4.0 

22.10 4.0 

21.67 4.0 

37.0 0 

55.0 0 

52.0 0 

45.0 0 

44.0 0 

43.0 0 

0 93 

0 80 

0 91 

0 91 

0 100 

0 100 

0 100 

-2.48 100 

' -3.07 100 

" 

+0.60 100 

-0.95 100 

-0.86 100 

+1 .37 100 

+2.86 100 

7.05 100 

3.78 100 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

s 

s 

s 

s 

s 

s 

s 
Data Evaluation and Concurrence Report for Particulate Matter 

PA Central Office (1256) 

otal 0-10um STP (81102) INTERMITTENT 

ast Ohio PQAO (1454) 

 Plan Approval Date: 

 

# Sites 

Collocated 

5 

% cv 

Collocated Est CV UB 

100 6.90 7.45 

Routine Data (ug/m3) 

Criteria 

Met? 

y 

Flow Rate Audit Collocation Concurrence Flag 

or Exceed. Outlier % I % 

~ Mean Min Max Count Count Complete .::B::ia::s:__:C::o::m~p=le::te:.L.::C:::V:.___:=::~====:::~..:==: .:::~ -=~==::J 

 19.62 3.0 54.0 0 

 17.16 5.0 34.0 0 

 16.02 4.0 33.0 0 

 23.24 3.0 56.0 0 

 25.56 7.0 60.0 0 

 31 .76 6.0 90.0 0 

 23.96 6.0 51 .0 0 

 28.71 6.0 59.0 0 

 23.45 4.0 44.0 0 

 23.40 5.0 43.0 0 

 41 .93 10.0 119.0 0 

37.28 5.0 83.0 0 

15.67 5.0 35.0 0 

17.16 3.0 35.0 0 

17.37 2.0 36.0 0 

10.07 3.0 35.0 0 

15.72 3.0 32.0 0 

19.20 3.0 57.0 0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

100 

95 

96 

100 

100 

100 

100 

0 100 

0 100 

0 100 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

95 

96 

100 

95 

95 

98 

96 

98 

-0.68 100 

+1 .09 100 

+0.72 100 

+1 .94 100 

+2.14 100 

+0.45 100 

+3.70 100 

+0.96 100 

+3.05 100 

+2.03 100 

+3.94 100 

+1 .38 100 

+3.63 100 

-1 .79 100 

-1.63 100 

+3.58 100 

-2.88 100 

-1 .80 100 

6.89 100 

5.94 100 

4.24 100 

9.58 100 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

s 

s 

s 

s 

s 

s 

s 

s 

s 

s 

s 

s 

s 

s 

s 

s 

s 

s 
Data Evaluation and Concurrence Report for Particulate Matter 

PA Central Office (1256) 

otal 0-10um STP (81102) INTERMITTENT 

ast Ohio PQAO (1454) 

 Plan Approval Date: 

 

# Sites % CV Criteria 

Collocated Collocated Est CV UB Met? 

5 100 6.90 7.45 y 

Routine Data (ug/m3) Flow Rate Audit Collocation Concurrence Flag 

or Exceed. Outlier % % 

! Mean Min Max Count Count Complete Bias Complete CV 

 18.68 2.0 56.0 0 0 I 98 -3.87 100 y y y y s 

 16.65 1.0 43.0 0 0 i 80 -2.61 100 26.72 100 y y y y s 

 14.71 1.0 31.0 0 0 I 84 I -7.47 100 y y y y s 

 12.75 .0 34.0 0 0 93 I -3.65 100 y y y y s 
Data Evaluation and Concurrence Report for Particulate Matter 

PA Central Office (1256) 

otal 0-1 Oum STP (811 02) INTERMITTENT 

West Ohio PQAO (1455) 

 Plan Approval Date: 

 

# Sites 

Collocated 

4 

% cv 

Collocated Est CV UB 

100 4.11 4 .41 

Routine Data (ug/m3) 

Criteria 

Met? 

y 

Flow Rate Audit 

or Exceed.Outlier % % 

Collocation Concurrence Flag 

~ Mean Min Max Count Count Complete L-=:B::ia::s:.__::C::o=::m::p::l::e::te:L:C::V:::__::::::::::::::.::::=::::::::::::c:::::L_::~ ---=~~=:::::J 

 20.07 8.0 45.0 0 

 23.38 7.0 46.0 0 

RI 20.23 4.0 42.0 0 

RI 38.46 10.0 97.0 0 

 13.42 4.0 42.0 0 

 23.63 9.0 51.0 0 

 16.49 3.0 44.0 0 

 17.00 3.0 46.0 0 

 20.08 8.0 43.0 0 

 19.65 8.0 44.0 0 

17.45 8.0 41 .0 0 

18.69 5.0 49.0 0 

18.85 5.0 50.0 0 

16.56 8.0 42.0 0 

16.72 7.0 40.0 0 

16.37 7.0 32.0 0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

96 

96 

100 

98 

95 

100 

97 

96 

100 

100 

100 

98 

98 

98 

100 

95 

+0.41 100 

+0.19 100 

-1 .21 100 

-0.12 100 

-0.79 100 

-0.17 100 

-1 .27 100 

-0.32 100 

-0.47 100 

-0.97 100 

+0.80 70 

-2.40 100 

-0.85 100 

+5.94 70 

+2.80 70 

+3.32 100 

4.37 100 

4.80 100 

4.98 100 

4.21 100 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

s 

s 

s 

s 

s 

s 

s 

s 

s 

s 

s 

s 

s 

s 

s 

s 
Data Evaluation and Concurrence Report for Particulate Matter 

PA Central Office (1256) 

Local Conditions (88101) 

Ohio PQAO (1453) 

 Plan Approval Date: 

 PEP Summary 

#Sites % cv Criteria # #Audited #PEP #PEP % Criteria 

Collocated Collocated Est CV UB Met? Methods Methods Required Submitted Complete Bias Met? 

0 0 r--"N 4 3 8 9 100 +0.16 y . 

1 100 8.88 12.06 y 

2 100 9.24 10.28 y 

3 100 5.16 5.61 y 

Routine Data (ug/m3) Flow Rate Audit Collocation PEP Concurrence Flag 

or Exceed. Outlier % % % PQAO PQAO QAPP AQS Rec CA Rec EPA 

~ Mean Min Max Count Count Complete Bias Complete CV Complete Crit. Met Crit. MeJ rumr:. Flag Flag Concur 

 9.63 1.7 26.7 0 90 : +1 .12 100 9.34 100 y y y y y s 

 7.35 1.9 18.6 0 93 j -2.02 100 12.05 100 y y y y y s 

7.27 2.4 19.9 0 83 -1 .72 100 y y y y y s 

8.72 1.5 23.9 0 98 ' -1 .42 100 y y y y y s 

9.93 2.1 24.2 0 90 -2.05 100 y y y y y s 

10.35 2.1 30.7 0 95 ' t•''-1.18 100 8.25 100 y y y y y s 

11.02 3.3 28.4 0 93 -0.80 100 y y y y y s 

9.81 1.7 24.9 0 100 1 -1.45 100 y y y y y s 

10.74 1.9 37.5 0 90 -2.63 100 7.53 100 y y y y y s 

11 .20 2.4 24.1 0 83 -1.07 100 y y y y y s 

9.15 1.8 26.7 0 100 -1.32 100 y y y y y s 

10.66 3.1 36.0 0 100 -0.12 100 y y y y y s 

10.15 2.0 40.3 0 97 -1.42 100 2.35 100 y y y y y s 

10.68 2.8 23.2 0 95 -1 .33 100 y y y y y s 

-
Data Evaluation and Concurrence Report for Particulate Matter 

PA Central Office (1256) 

Local Conditions (88101) 

Ohio PQAO (1453) 

 Plan Approval Date: 

 PEP Summary 

#Sites % cv Criteria # #Audited #PEP #PEP % Criteria 

Collocated Collocated Est CV UB Met? Methods Methods Required Submitted Complete Bias Met? 

0 0 I N 4 3 8 9 100 +0.16 y -

1 100 8.88 12.06 y 

2 I 100 9.24 10.28 y 

' 

3 100 5.16 5.61 y 

Routine Data (ug/m3) Flow Rate Audit Collocation PEP Concurrence Flag 

or Exceed. Outlier % % % PQAO PQAO QAPP AQS Rec CA Rec EPA 

~ Mean Min Max Count Count Complete Bias Complete CV Complete Crit. Met Crit. Met 

~ Flag Flag Concur 

 9.59 2.3 37.0 0 98 ' -1 .33 100 y y y y y s 

 9.96 2.6 38.4 0 99 -1.10 100 y y y y y s 

 9.80 1.7 26.5 0 78 +0.42 - 50 y y y N I N s -
Data Evaluation and Concurrence Report for Particulate Matter 

PA Central Office (1256) 

Local Conditions (88101) 

ast Ohio PQAO (1454) 

 Plan Approval Date: 

y PEP Summary 

#Sites % cv Criteria # #Audited #PEP #PEP % Criteria 

Collocated Collocated Est CV UB Met? Methods Methods Required Submitted Complete Bias Met? 

2 100 6.60 7.28 y 4 4 8 7 87.5 -6.20 y 

2 ,, 100 4.40 4.82 y 

2 I 100 3.93 4.24 y 

0 L9 __.!:!__. -

Routine Data (ug/m3) Flow Rate Audit Collocation PEP Concurrence Flag ! 

or Exceed. Outlier % % % PQAO PQAO QAPP AQS RecCA Rec EPA 

~ Mean Min Max Count Count Complete Bias Complete CV Complete Crit Met Crit. Me 

~ Flag Flag Concur 

 9.17 1.5 25.2 0 ; 98 -2.20 100 y y y y y s 

 11 .77 2.9 38.5 0 92 +1 .10 100 3.80 100 y y y y y s 

 11 .76 2.8 39.3 0 100 -3.35 100 y y y y y s 

 10.95 2.4 28.3 0 95 -3.43 100 y y y y y s 

 13.34 2.2 36.5 0 98 -2.04 100 y y y y y s 

 9.05 1.7 24.8 0 96 -0.91 100 y y y y y s 

 8.13 1.6 21 .5 0 97 +0.40 100 8.19 100 y y y y y s 

 8.47 1.5 20.9 0 95 -0.36 100 y y y y y s 

 8.31 1.5 27.4 0 96 +1 .36 100 6.75 100 y y y y y s 

 8.67 2.2 29.9 0 93 -0.68 100 y y y y y s 

 10.84 1.9 32.4 0 95 i. +1.47 100 5.85 100 y y y y y s 

 11 .02 1.8 32.0 0 100 I -1 .20 100 y y y y y s 

 10.51 1.4 34.8 0 100 +0.85 100 y y y y y s 

 9.66 2.6 24.0 0 100 +1 .03 100 y y y y y s 

 7.57 1.4 22.6 0 95 -0.07 100 y y y y y s 

------------
Data Evaluation and Concurrence Report for Particulate Matter 

PA Central Office (1256) 

Local Conditions (881 01) 

ast Ohio PQAO (1454) 

 Plan Approval Date: 

 PEP Summary 

#Sites % cv Criteria # #Audited #PEP #PEP % Criteria 

Collocated Collocated Est CV UB Met? Methods Methods Required Submitted Complete Bias Met? 

2 100 6.60 7.28 y 4 4 8 7 87.5 -6.20 y I 

2 I 100 4.40 4.82 y I 

2 I 100 3.93 4.24 y 

0 i 0 N ~ 

: 

Routine Data (ug/m3) Flow Rate Audit Collocation 

PEP Concurrence Flag i 

I 

or Exceed. Outlier % % % PQAO PQAO QAPP AQS RecCA Rec EPA i 

~ Mean Min Max Count Count Complete Bias Complete CV Complete Crit. Me Crit. Me 

~ 

Flag Flag Concur 

 8.93 1.6 22.9 0 95 -1 .24 100 y y y y y s 

 11.43 2.3 32.2 0 99 I +2.11 100 4.09 100 y I y y y y s 

 12.39 3.3 33.2 0 100 -1 .39 100 y y y y y s 

 10.45 2.4 38.2 0 97 +1 .15 100 y y y y y s 

 10.22 1.8 35.1 0 93 -2.47 100 4.82 100 y y y y y s 

 10.91 1.9 35.7 0 86 -2.58 100 y y y y y s 

13.87 -7.6 196.1 0 97 -2.10 100 y y y y y s 

 9.93 1.9 47.0 0 84 -1 .41 100 y y y y y s 

11 .79 5.3 27.5 0 78 +/-0.00 100 y y y y y s 

9.65 2.9 20.6 0 78 -0.12 100 y y y y y s 

11 .28 2.6 26.1 0 76 -1 .77 100 I N l y y N N s 

11 .63 -8.0 ~---55.6 ----- - -- 0 94 l +10.30 , 100 y y y Nl N s 
Data Evaluation and Concurrence Report for Particulate Matter 

PA Central Office (1256) 

Local Conditions (88101) 

West Ohio PQAO (1455) 

 Plan Approval Date: 

 PEP Summary 

#Sites % cv Criteria # #Audited #PEP #PEP % Criteria 

Collocated Collocated Est CV UB Met? Methods Methods Required Submitted Complete Bias Met? 

1 100 5.57 6.41 y 4 3 8 8 100 -4.80 y 

1 l 100 4.05 4.63 y . 

2 100 5.01 5.52 y 

1 I 100 5.01 5.74 y 

i Routine Data (ug/m3) Flow Rate Audit Collocation PEP Concurrence Flag I 

or Exceed. Outlier % % % PQAO PQAO QAPP AQS RecCA Rec EPA . 

! Mean Min Max Count Count Complete Bias Complete CV Complete Crit. Me Crit. Me 

~ 

Flag Flag Concur 

 9.67 3.7 20.7 0 100 -2.67 100 y y y y y s 

 11.01 2.0 23.4 0 100 -2.56 100 y y y y y s 

 8.54 2.9 22.6 0 100 -2.54 100 y y y y y s 

 10.41 2.3 30.8 0 100 -2.16 100 y y y y y s 

RI 9.50 2.7 21 .2 0 100 -1 .64 100 y y y y y s 

RI 10.95 2.2 26.6 0 100 -1 .91 100 y y y y y s 

RI 11.06 4.3 22.4 0 100 -0.36 100 y y y y y s 

RI 12.52 3.0 27.8 0 100 -2.16 100 y y y y y s 

12.08 3.9 31.8 0 I 96 -0.45 100 y y y y y s 

 8.31 2.5 21 .6 0 100 . -1 .71 100 y y y y y s 

 9.69 1.9 26.8 0 100 -1 .02 100 y y y y y s 

 8.33 2.2 17.7 0 100 -3.04 100 7.26 100 y y y y y s 

 8.48 2.0 17.3 0 100 -1 .68 100 y y y y y s 

 8.22 2.2 20.9 0 100 -2.68 100 y y y y y s 

-
Data Evaluation and Concurrence Report for Particulate Matter 

PA Central Office (1256) 

Local Conditions (88101) 

West Ohio PQAO (1455) 

 Plan Approval Date: 

 PEP Summary 

#Sites % cv Criteria # #Audited #PEP #PEP % Criteria 

Collocated Collocated Est CV UB Met? Methods Methods Required Submitted Complete Bias Met? 

1 100 5.57 6.41 y 4 3 8 8 100 -4.80 y 

1 100 4.05 4.63 y 

2 ' 100 5.01 5.52 y 

1 ' 100 5.01 5.74 y 

Routine Data (ug/m3) Flow Rate Audit Collocation PEP Concurrence Flag 

or Exceed. Outlier % % % PQAO PQAO QAPP AQS Rec CA Rec EPA 

~ Mean Min Max Count Count Complete Bias Complete CV Complete Crit. Me Crit. Me ~ Flag Flag Concur, 

i 

 9.31 2.2 25.8 0 97 -0.82 100 y y y y y s 

 9.45 2.2 21 .4 0 100 +0.27 100 y I y y y y s 

 8.92 2.7 21 .8 0 100 -0.45 100 y y y y y s 

 10.68 2.1 26.6 0 95 -0.66 100 4.63 100 y y y y y s 

 11 .27 3.5 25.0 0 98 I -0.89 100 I y y y y y s 

 9.24 2.1 24.6 0 98 -1 .21 100 4.07 100 I y y y y y s 

 9.44 2.2 22.0 0 96 -0.53 100 I y y y y y s 

 9.73 2.9 25.0 0 100 -0.82 100 y y y y y s 

 10.47 2.3 27.0 0 100 -0.27 100 y y y y y s 

 7.28 1.8 17.9 0 97 -2.48 100 y y y y y s 

 9.46 1.9 21 .1 0 95 -2.02 100 5.74 100 y y y y y s 

 10.35 2.3 33.4 0 100 -2.25 100 y y y y y s 

 8.32 1.6 19.8 0 93 -1 .79 100 y y y y y s 

 8.53 1.7 31 .5 0 97 -1 .50 100 6.41 100 y y y y y s 

 8.77 1.8 20.8 0 91 ' -1 .92 100 y y y y y s 
Data Evaluation and Concurrence Report for Particulate Matter 

PA Central Office (1256) 

- Local Conditions (88101) 

West Ohio PQAO (1455) 

 Plan Approval Date: 

y PEP Summary 

#Sites % cv Criteria # #Audited #PEP #PEP % Criteria 

Collocated Collocated Est CV UB Met? Methods Methods Required Submitted Complete Bias Met? 

1 100 5.57 6.41 y 4 3 8 8 100 -4.80 y 

1 100 4.05 4.63 y 

2 100 5.01 5.52 y 

1 100 5.01 5.74 y 

Routine Data (ug/m3) Flow Rate Audit Collocation 

PEP Concurrence Flag 

tor Exceed. Outlier % % % PQAO PQAO QAPP AQS RecCA Rec EPA 

~ Mean Min Max Count Count Complete Bias Complete CV Complete Crit. Met Crit. Met 

~ 

Flag Flag Concur 

8.60 2.7 19.2 0 100 +I- ro:. 

- - - --- ---- - -- - y y y N N s 
Data Concurrence and Evaluation Report for Lead 

 Central Office (1256) 

3) 

al Date: 

 Number of 

s Actual 

Colloc Sites 

2 

ber Percent 

Percent 

Collocated 

100 

cv 

Est 

5.81 

mitted Complete Bias 

Criteria 

Met 

24 92 +/-4.58 y 

n 

CVUB 

7.42 

Criteria 

Met 

y 

PEP Summary Number of Number of 

Number of Methods PEP Audits 

Methods Audited Required 

0 

Exceed. Outlier 

Routine Data (ug/m"3) 

Percent Percent Percent PQAO 

I 

Flow Rate Audit I Collocation 

PQAO 

I 

PEP 

 ~ ~ ~ Count 

0.002 0.019 0 

0.003 0.316 0 

0.003 0.196 

0.002 0.067 

0.002 0.044 

0.002 0.012 

0.002 0.010 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

Comp. ~ Comp. ~ Comp. ~ 

100 -2.15 100 

98 -1 .50 100 

91 

100 

100 

98 

98 

+2.06 

-3.55 

-2.78 

+2.90 

+5.40 

100 

70 

70 

100 

100 

7.42 100 

100 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

~ 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

Number of 

Audits Percent Criteria 

Submitted Complete Bias Met 

Analysis 

Crit. Met I 

lead 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

0 0 y 

I 

Certification 

QAPP AQS CA Rec EPA 

Appr. ~ Value Concur 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

s 

s 

s 

s 

s 

s 

s 
Data Concurrence and Evaluation Report for Lead 

Central Office (1256) 

454) 

al Date: 

 Number of 

s Actual 

Colloc Sites 

ber Percent 

3 

Percent 

Collocated 

100 

cv 

Est 

3.43 

mitted Complete Bias 

Criteria 

Met 

24 92 +1-4.58 y 

n 

CVUB 

4.74 

Criteria 

Met 

y 

PEP Summary Number of Number of 

Number of Methods PEP Audits 

Methods Audited Required 

0 2 

Exceed. Outlier 

Routine Data (uglm"3) 

 

~ Max Count Count I 

Flow Rate Audit I Collocation 

Percent Percent Percent PQAO 

Comp. ~ Comp. CV UB Comp. Crit. Met I 

p~e; 

~ 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.002 

0.003 

0.003 

0.003 

0.003 

0.002 

0.025 

0.090 

0.020 

0.020 

0.031 

0.034 

0.024 

0.049 

0.052 

0.060 

0.098 

0.051 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

98 +0.24 100 

1 00 -2.33 1 00 

98 +1 .87 100 

98 -0.51 100 

95 

100 

95 

98 

91 

96 

98 

98 

+2.57 

+3.15 

-2.07 

+0.10 

+4.27 

+3.35 

+2.09 

+1 .41 

100 

100 

100 

100 

100 

100 

100 

100 

18.51 

5.64 

y 

y 

100 y 

100 

100 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

Number of 

Audits Percent Criteria 

Submitted Complete Bias Met 

I 

Lead 

Analysis 

~ 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

0 0 y 

I 

Certification 

QAPP AQS CA Rec EPA 

Appr. ~Value C~ 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

s 

s 

s 

s 

s 

s 

s 

s 

s 

s 

s 

s 
Data Concurrence and Evaluation Report for Lead 

Central Office (1256) 

1455) 

al Date: 

 Number of 

s Actual 

Colloc Sites 

2 

Percent 

Collocated 

100 

cv 

Est CVUB 

Criteria 

Met 

y 

PEP Summary Number of Number of 

Number of Methods PEP Audits 

Methods Audited Required 

0 

ber Percent 

mitted Complete Bias 

Criteria 

Met 

24 92 +/-4.58 

n 

Exceed. Outlier 

Routine Data (ug/m"3) 

 ~ ~ Count Count 

0.002 0.011 0 

0.002 0.007 

0.002 0.017 

0.002 0.017 

ertification 

0 

0 

0 

Exceed. Outlier 

Routine Data (ug/m"3) 

~ ~ ~ Count 

0.002 0.005 0 

y 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

I 

Flow Rate Audit I Collocation 

Percent Percent Percent PQAO 

Comp. ~ Comp. ~ Comp. ~ 

96 +1 .20 100 96 y 

100 

83 

76 

Percent 

Comp. 

+1 .16 

-4.27 

-5.09 

100 

100 

100 

Percent 

Bias Comp. I 

Flow Rate Audit 

--- ------

100 +I100 

y 

y 

y 

Percent PQAO 

I 

Collocation 

~ Comp. Crit. Met 

y 

I 

PEP 

PQAO 

~ 

y 

y 

y 

y 

PQAO 

Crit. Met I 

PEP 

y 

Number of 

Audits 

Submitted 

0 

I 

Lead 

Analysis 

~ 

y 

y 

y 

y 

Analysis 

Crit. Met I 

Lead 

y 

Percent 

Complete Bias 

0 

Criteria 

Met 

y 

I 

Certification 

QAPP AQS CA Rec EPA 

Appr. Rec. V ~ C~ 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

s 

s 

s 

s 

I 

Certification 

QAPP AQS CA Rec EPA 

Appr. ~~Concur 

y N N s 
Data Concurrence and Evaluation Report for Lead 

 Central Office (1256) 

1455) 

al Date: 

 Number of PEP Summary Number of Number of 

s Actual 

Colloc Sites 

Percent 

Collocated 

cv 

Est CVUB 

Criteria 

Met 

0 100 

ber Percent 

mitted Complete Bias 

Criteria 

Met 

66 100 +/-3.03 

n 

Exceed. Outlier 

y 

Percent 

Comp. 

Percent 

Bias Comp. 

Routine Data (ug/m"3) 

 ~ ~ Count Count I 

Flow Rate Audit 

--- ------

0.000 0.020 0 

0.000 0.022 0 

0 

0 

97 

96 

-1 .27 100 

-0.32 100 

Number of Methods PEP Audits 

Methods Audited Required 

0 

I 

Collocation 

Percent PQAO 

CVUB Comp. ~ 

100 

I Po';.~ ~ 

Number of 

Audits 

Submitted 

I 

Lead 

Analysis 

Crit. Met 

---

y 

y 

0 

Percent 

Complete Bias 

0 

Criteria 

Met 

I 

Certification 

QAPP AQS CA Rec EPA 

Appr. ~Value C~ 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

y 

s 

s 
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

QUICKLOOK ALL PARAMETERS 

Report Code: AMP450NC 

GEOGRAPHIC SELECTIONS 

al 

e State county Site Parameter POC City AQCR UAR CBSA 

39 

NS 

Method 

Duration 

CSA 

EPA 

Region 

SORT ORDER I 

Option Value 1 Order Column 

NS 

YES 1 STATE_CODE 

EXCLUDE REGIONALLY CONCURRED EVENTS 2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

PQAO 

ate 

Selection Criteria Page 1 

COUNTY_CODE 

SITE_ID 

PARAMETER_CODE 

POC 

DATES 

EDT ID 

APPLICABLE STANDARDS 

Standard Description 

Apr. 29, 2016 
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM 

QUICKLOOK ALL PARAMETERS 

EXCEPTIONAL DATA TYPES 

DESCRIPTION I 

NO EVENTS 

EVENTS EXCLUDED EVENTS INCLUDED EVENTS WITH CONCURRENCE EXCLUDED 

Apr. 29, 20 16 
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM 

QUICKLOOK ALL PARAMETERS 

Apr. 29, 2016 

p 

0 

c 

11 1st Max 2nd Max 3rd Max 4th Max Arith. Cert& t<~ 

Unit PQAO Duration Eval ~ Year Meth Obs Value Va l ue Value Value Mean 

eland 

 

innati 

County: Cuyahoga 

Micrograms/cubic meter 1 

(LC) 

1454 

County: Hamilton 

2015 176 

Micrograms/ cubic meter 1 1455 2015 173 

(LC) 

Micrograms/cubic meter 2 1455 2015 173 

(LC) 

n a city County: Noble 

 

Paris 

Micrograms/cubic meter 5 

(LC) 

0745 

County: Preble 

Micrograms/cubic meter 1 

(LC) 

1455 

2015 805 

2015 176 

Address: E. 14TH & ORANGE 

92 75.8 57.3 53.7 49.3 

Address: 250 WM. HOWARD TAFT 

117 25.1 23.7 20.4 19.3 

56 27.3 18 . 5 1 7.5 16.0 

Address: ST JOHNS ROAD QUAKER CITY 

58 23.9 12.1 11.3 10 .6 

Address: 6940 OXFORD GETTYSBURG RD . 

106 21.7 1 6.4 13.2 12.1 

does not 

Page 2 of 5 

19. 75* 24 HOUR 

7 .86 24 HOUR 

7.99 24 HOUR 

5.81*24 HOUR 

4. 74* 24 HOUR 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 
~1ETHOD 

CODE 

173 

176 

805 

does not 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONt~ENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM 

QUICKLOOK ALL PARAMETERS 

METHODS USED IN THIS REPORT 

COLLECTION METHOD ANALYSIS METHOD 

BGI Inc Model PQ200 PM10-2.5 Sampler Pair Paired Gravimetric Difference 

Thermo Scientific Partisol-Plus Model 2025 Se· Paired Gravimetric 

IMPROVE IMPROVE 

Page 3 of 5 

Apr. 29, 2016 
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM 

QUICKLOOK ALL PARAMETERS 

PQAOS USED IN THIS REPORT 

 '"'"c' DEEC'''T'ON I 

 does not 

National Park Service North East Ohio PQAO 

South West Ohio PQAO 

Page 4 of 5 

Apr. 29, 2016 
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM 

QUICKLOOK ALL PARAMETERS 

CERTIFICATION EVALUATION AND CONCURRENCE FLAG MEANINGS 

ion has revised data from this monitor since the 

n letter received from the state. 

s submitted the certification letter and required 

certifying agency and/or EPA has determined 

e quality of the ambient concentration data cannot 

completeness, the lack of performed quality 

results of uncertainty statistics shown in the 

tification and quality assurance report. 

s submitted the certification letter and required 

of "S" conveys no Regional assessment regarding 

s flag will remain until the Region provides an "N" or 

ng agency did not submit a required certification 

ts for this monitor even though the due date has 

ertification letter specifically did not apply the 

onitor. 

uired by 40 CFR 58 . 15 and no conditions apply to be 

another flag value 

s submitted a certification letter, and EPA has no 

about data quality (after reviewing t he letter, the 

 the amount of quality assurance da ta 

ality statistics, and the highest reported 

 does not 

Page 5 of 5 

Apr. 29, 2016