alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsTESS Data Release Notes: Sector 7, DR9This release note discusses the science data products produced by the Science Processing Operations Center at Ames Research Center from Sector 7 observations made with the TESS spacecraft and cameras as a means to document instrument performance and data characteristics.Document ID20190002170Acquisition SourceAmes Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsFausnaugh, Michael M.*(Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Cambridge, MA, United States)*Burke, Christopher J.*(Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Cambridge, MA, United States)*Caldwell, Douglas A.*(Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence Inst. Mountain View, CA, United States)*Jenkins, Jon M.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Smith, Jeffrey C.*(Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence Inst. Mountain View, CA, United States)*Twicken, Joseph D.*(Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence Inst. Mountain View, CA, United States)*Vanderspek, Roland*(Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Cambridge, MA, United States)*Doty, John P.*(Noqsi Aerospace Ltd. Billerica, MA, United States)*Ting, Eric B.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Villasenor, Joel S.*(Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Cambridge, MA, United States)*Date AcquiredApril 4, 2019Publication DateMarch 11, 2019Subject CategoryAstronomyReport/Patent NumberARC-E-DAA-TN67170NASA/TM-2019-220170Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: SPEC5764CONTRACT_GRANT: NNX17AK23ACONTRACT_GRANT: NNG14FC03CWBS: WBS 985788.04.02.03Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Technical ReviewNASA Technical ManagementKeywordsTESS MissionTransit SurveyExoplanetsAvailable DownloadsNameType20190002170.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsIDRelationTitle20190001935See AlsoTESS Data Release Notes: Sector 4, DR520190002566See AlsoTESS Data Release Notes: Sector 8, DR1020190001908See AlsoTESS Data Release Notes: Sector 6, DR820190002501See AlsoTESS Data Release Notes: Sectors 1-3, Multi-Sector Search, DR620190001284See AlsoTESS Data Release Notes: Sector 2, DR220190001907See AlsoTESS Data Release Notes: Sector 5, DR720190002535See AlsoTESS Data Release Notes: Sector 1, DR120190002502See AlsoTESS Data Release Notes: Sector 3, DR420190002758See AlsoTESS Data Release Notes: Sectors 1 & 2, Multi-Sector 1-2, DR3visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
<PAGE>   1

                      [PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LETTERHEAD]



Exhibit 24.1




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
AZCO Mining Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-56468, 33-61434 and 333-31807) of our
report dated August 26, 1998, on our audits of the financial statements and
financial statement schedule of AZCO Mining Inc. as of June 30, 1998 and 1997,
and for the years ended June 30, 1998, 1997 and 1996, which report is included
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.





PricewaterhouseCoopers
Vancouver, British Columbia
September 28, 1998




PricewaterhouseCoopers is a Canadian member firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers
International Limited, an English company limited by guarantee.
#### § 211.34 Consultants.

Consultants advising on the manufacture, processing, packing, or holding of drug products shall have sufficient education, training, and experience, or any combination thereof, to advise on the subject for which they are retained. Records shall be maintained stating the name, address, and qualifications of any consultants and the type of service they provide.
###### Editorial Note on Part 369

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 369 appear at 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004.

#### § 369.7 Warnings required by official compendia.

Any drug included in the official compendia defined by the act shall bear such warning or caution statement as may be required by such compendia, and no statement in subpart B or subpart C of this part is intended to alter, modify, or permit the omission of any such statement required by such compendia.
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Stegman & Company

GRAPHIC

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Board
of Directors and Stockholders
First Mariner Bancorp
Baltimore, Maryland

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos. 333-60961, 333-60963, 333-60967, 333-107669,
333-114073, 333-122464, and 333-170903) on Form S-8 and (No. 333-107670) on Form S-3 of First Mariner
Bancorp of our report dated March 29, 2011, relating to the 2010 consolidated financial statements included in the annual report on Form 10-K of First Mariner Bancorp, for
the year ended December 31, 2010.

GRAPHIC


Baltimore,
Maryland
March 29, 2011

---



QuickLinks
---

---

Exhibit 14.1

# Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-102288 and 333-92491) and
Form F-3 (File Nos. 333-115826, 333-114428, 333-47842 and 333-92493) of our report dated
June 6, 2005 except as to Notes 1b, 10 and 11e which are dated July 10, 2005, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements of Nur Macroprinters Ltd. included in this Annual
Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004.

|July 13, 2005 
Tel-Aviv, Israel |  | /s/ KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERERA Member of Ernst & Young Global
|------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 27, 2021.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-19-00900-CR

JESUS VASQUEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 178th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1591185

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant appeals his conviction for possession with intent to deliver a 

controlled substance. Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in which counsel 

concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the 

requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by assigning issues that

might arguably support the appeal, and explaining why those issues do not raise 

arguable error. See Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137, 138 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969).
2

A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised 

of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford 

v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 512 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). At appellant’s request, the 

record was provided to him. On December 7, 2020, appellant filed a pro se 

response to counsel’s brief.

We have carefully reviewed the record, counsel’s brief, and appellant’s pro 

se response and agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we 

find no reversible error in the record. We are not to address the merits of each 

claim raised in an Anders brief or a pro se response when we have determined 

there are no arguable grounds for review. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 

827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Zimmerer, and Poissant.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Order entered April 2 2 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 13
- 01 664
- CR
LEMUEL MOSLEY , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Ca use No. F11
- 57352
- I



### O RDER
The Court has before it appellant’s April 2, 2014 second motion to extend time to file his brief. In the motion, counsel states that the court reporter has not filed a copy of the reporter’s record with the District Clerk, so c ounsel has not been able to prepare the brief. We GRANT appellant’s motion as follows.
We ORDER Kendra Thibodeaux, deputy official court reporter, to file a complete copy of the reporter’s record, including all exhibits, with the Dallas County District Cl erk by APRIL 28, 2014 . We further ORDER that Ms. Thibodeaux file in this Court, by 5:00 p.m. on April 28,2 014 , written verification that she has complied with this order.
We ORDER appellant to file his brief by MAY 30, 2014

.We DIRECT the Clerk to send co pies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Kendra

Thibodeaux, deputy official court reporter, and to counsel for all parties.
/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2011 - 0572 Directorate Identifier: 2011NM009AD

ACB GV 30 --- 12/6/10 ACB G500 10 --- 12/6/10 ACB G550 10 --- 12/6/10

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administra tion

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
# United States Court of Appeals **For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________ No. 12-2424

___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Frank Wilks lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis

____________ Submitted: April 2, 2014 Filed: May 9, 2014 [Unpublished]

____________ Before LOKEN, MELLOY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Frank Wilks appeals the sentence imposed on him after pleading guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Counsel has moved to withdraw, filing a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel argues that the di strict court erred in determining thatWilks’s 1993 Missouri escape-from-custody conviction was a violent felony for section 924(e) purposes. Wilks also allege s that the court failed to explain how it applied the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors in determining the sentence and did not give adequate weight to Wilks’s physical and mental health problems. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is denied. The case is remanded for further consideration in light of United States v. Tucker , 740 F.3d 1177 (8th Cir. 2014) (en banc).

______________________________

-2-
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 7225** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. JANEIRO BURGESS, a/k/a Key, a/k/a Dirty , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Wilmington
. Louise W. Flanagan , District Judge. ( 7 : 12

- cr - 00019

- FL

- 1; 7:13

- cv - 00277

- FL )

Submitted : December 28, 2015 Decided: January 8, 2016

Before KING and GREGORY , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Janeiro Burgess, Appellant Pro Se. Shailika S. Kotiya, Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Rudy E. Renfer, Assistant Un ited States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Janeiro Burgess seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion. T he order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.”
2 8 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wro ng. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Burgess has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# RECEIVED U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

### OCT 06 2014 

## ------------------RHEE-A/\M:RwiNG DOCKET Inthe Matter ofGlobal Aircraft Interiors, Inc. DocketNo. FAA-2014-0324

Case No. 2011EA110043 Administrative Law Judge J.E. Sullivan AGENCY'S REQUESTFORPOSTPONEMENT OF LITIGATION SCHEDULING CONFERENCE COMES NOW the Agency, by counsel, and hereby requests a postponement ofthe litigation scheduling conference that is scheduled for September 30, 2013. The basis for this request that that the Agency's representative, the undersigned, is scheduled to attend an all-day continuing legal education (CLE) course that day. This training opportunity just
came up and Agency counseling wasjustnotified over this past weekend that he would be enrolled in this course. Because offunding limitations within the Agency, it is unknown whether Agency counsel will have the opportunity to take this course at some time in the future. Itis also noted the Agency submitted its proposed discovery schedule without the input ofRespondent, because Respondent's counsel did not get back to Agency counsel to informthe latter as to whetherRespondent concurs. Postponing the conference would allow the parties more time to try to come up with a mutually agreeable proposed discovery schedule.Agency counsel has conferred with Respondent's counsel, and the following are mutually convenient proposed alternate dates: October 6, 2014 (in the afternoon), October 7, 2014 (any time 11:00 a.m. or thereafter), or October 8, 2014 (in the morning). The Agency's representative will not be available on October 9, 10, 15, or 16. Respondent's counsel will notbe available from October 22, throughNovember 4, 2014.
WHEREFORE, the Agency requests that the litigation scheduling conference be postponed to October 6, 2014 (inthe afternoon), October 7, 20 14 (any time 11 :00 a.m. or thereafter),
or October 8, 2014 (inthe morning).
Respectfully submitted, Alfred R. Johnson, Jr.

# ::~::~~~ Attorney Federal AviationAdministration 1Aviation Plaza Jamaica, NY 11434 TEL:718 553-3258 FAX: 718 995-5699 Date: September 29, 2014

2CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that the foregoing Agency's Response for Postponement of Litigation Scheduling Conferencehas been sentviafirst class mail and facsimile addressed as follows: Sande E. Lichtenstein, Esq. Lichtenstein & Schindel 158 WestBostonPostRoad P.O. Box 787 Mamaroneck, NY 10543 FAX: 914-698-3313 Judge J.E. Sullivan U.S. Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 FAX: 202-366-7536 I hereby certify that the foregoing Agency's Response for Postponement of Litigation Scheduling Conferencehas been sentviafust class mail addressed as follows:
FederalAviationAdministration (Original and one copy) 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591 Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building- Room 2014



### SEP 29 2014 Date:.
______ _ Paralegal Specialist Federal AviationAdministration Office ofRegional Counsel 1AviationPlaza Jamaica, NY 11434

3
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                                Washington, D.C.

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT

                       Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
                      THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

        Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported) March 10, 2000

                          GEOTEK COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
                -------------------------------------------------
               (Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

         Delaware                       0-17581                  22-2358635
----------------------------     ----------------------     --------------------
(State of other jurisdiction    (Commission File Number)     (IRS Employer
 of incorporation)                                           Identification No.)

102 Chestnut Ridge Road, Montvale, New Jersey                      07645
---------------------------------------------                    ---------
(Address of principle executive offices)                         (Zip Code)

        Registrant's telephone number, including area code 201-930-5430
                                                           ------------


                                      N/A
     ----------------------------------------------------------------------
         (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)


<PAGE>

Item 5. Other Events

As previously reported, Geotek Communications, Inc. and its domestic
subsidiaries (the "Debtors") filed the Debtor's First Amended Consolidated Plan
of Liquidation (the "Plan") and related Disclosure Statement, in the Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Delaware on April 9, 1999. Also as previously
reported, pursuant to that Plan as amended and confirmed on August 27, 1999, the
Preferred Stock and Common Stock were to be canceled upon the effective date of
the Plan and holders of the Debtor's Preferred Stock and Common Stock were not
to receive or retain any property under the Plan.

On March 10, 2000 the Plan was declared effective. As such, and pursuant to the
Plan as discussed above, the Debtor's Preferred Stock and Common Stock is now
deemed canceled.

The Company is completing the liquidation of its assets and expects to dissolve
the Company and its domestic subsidiaries before the end of calendar year 2000.


<PAGE>
                                   SIGNATURES

      Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                           GEOTEK COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

Date: March 17, 2000                       By: /s/ Anne E. Eisele
      --------------                           ------------------
                                               Name: Anne E. Eisele
                                               Title: President and Chief
                                               Financial Officer
Exhibit 14.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Forms F-3 No. 333-118932 and
No. 333-13550 and Form S-8 No. 333-106591) of Deutsche Telekom AG and in the related Prospectuses of our report dated March 14, 2005,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Deutsche Telekom AG included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2004.

|March 14, 2005                                                                             |  |                            
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ---------------------------
|Ernst & Young AG
Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft
Stuttgart                                 |  |                            
|(Prof. Dr. Pfitzer)
Wirtschaftsprüfer                                                      |  | (Hollweg)
Wirtschaftsprüfer
|PwC Deutsche Revision
Aktiengesellschaft
Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft
Frankfurt am Main |  |                            
|(Frings)
Wirtschaftsprüfer                                                                 |  | (Menke)
Wirtschaftsprüfer  

---



QuickLinks
§ 522.1367 Meloxicam. ( a ) *Specifications.* Each milliliter of solution contains 5.0 milligrams (mg) meloxicam.
( b ) *Sponsors.* See Nos. 000010, 016729, 017033, 055529, and 086101 in § 510.600(c) of this chapter.
( c ) *Conditions of use* — ( 1 ) *Dogs* — ( i ) *Amount.* Administer 0.09 mg per pound (mg/lb) body weight (0.2 mg per kilogram (mg/kg)) by intravenous or subcutaneous injection on the first day of treatment. For treatment after day 1, administer meloxicam suspension orally at 0.045 mg/lb (0.1 mg/kg) body weight once daily as in § 520.1367(c) of this chapter.
( ii ) *Indications for use.* For the control of pain and inflammation associated with osteoarthritis.
( iii ) *Limitations.* Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian.
( 2 ) *Cats* — ( i ) *Amount.* Administer 0.14 mg/lb (0.3 mg/kg) body weight as a single, one-time subcutaneous injection.
( ii ) *Indications for use.* For the control of postoperative pain and inflammation associated with orthopedic surgery, ovariohysterectomy, and castration when administered prior to surgery.
( iii ) *Limitations.* Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian.
[68 FR 68724, Dec. 10, 2003, as amended at 69 FR 69523, Nov. 30, 2004; 78 FR 5715, Jan. 28, 2013; 79 FR 74020, Dec. 15, 2014; 85 FR 18119, Apr. 1, 2020; 88 FR 14898, Mar. 10, 2023]
§ 520.763b Dithiazanine powder. ( a ) *Specifications.* Each tablespoon of powder contains 200 milligrams (mg) dithiazanine iodide.
( b ) *Sponsor.* See No. 069043 in § 510.600(c) of this chapter.
( c ) *Conditions of use in dogs* — ( 1 ) *Indications for use and amount.* Administer orally by mixing in food as follows: ( i ) For large roundworms (*Toxocara canis, Toxascaris leonina*): 10 mg per pound (/lb) of body weight for 3 to 5 days;
( ii ) For hookworms (*Ancylostoma caninum, Uncinaria stenocephala*) and whipworms (*Trichuris vulpis*): 10 mg/lb of body weight for 7 days;
( iii ) For Strongyloides (*Strongyloides canis,* *Strongyloides stercoralis*): 10 mg/lb of body weight for 10 to 12 days;
( iv ) For heartworm microfilariae (*Dirofilaria immitus*): 3 to 5 mg/lb of body weight for 7 to 10 days. Treatment for heartworm microfilariae should follow 6 weeks after therapy for adult worms.
( 2 ) *Limitations.* Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian.
[79 FR 28820, May 20, 2014, as amended at 83 FR 48945, Sept. 28, 2018]
<PAGE>   1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8, No. 33-58799) pertaining to the Penford Corporation 1994 Stock Option Plan
and to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8,
No. 33-88946) pertaining to the Penford Corporation Savings and Stock Ownership
Plan of our report dated October 8, 1999, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of Penford Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended August 31, 1999.

Seattle, Washington
November 19, 1999                                              ERNST & YOUNG LLP



                                       48