alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Progress report on theimplementation of the Marine Debris Research, Prevention, and Reduction Act.**
 
2008 | 2009 | 2011 | 2013 | 2015
 
SuDoc Number:C 55.451:
Item Number:0192-A-37 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 001101936
 
July 3, 2019
# L_2021204EN.01004701.xml

| 10.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 204/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 204/47

---

Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2018/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 on organic production and labelling of organic products and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 150 of 14 June 2018
  )

| 1. | On page 47, the title of Article 41: |
| --- | --- |

1.

On page 47, the title of Article 41:

for:

‘Additional rules on actions in case of non-compliance’,

read:

‘Additional rules on actions in the event of suspected and established non-compliance, and common catalogue of measures’.

| 2. | On page 47, the title of Article 42: |
| --- | --- |

2.

On page 47, the title of Article 42:

for:

‘Additional rules on measures in the event of non-compliance’,

read:

‘Additional rules on measures in the event of non-compliance affecting integrity’.

---
### Geology and hydrology of the Claiborne Group in western Tennessee

By: Gerald K. Moore

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1809F

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 7**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 8**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
[No. 38457-1-I.

Division One.

June 16, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Christian St. Jacques, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 95-8-01608-3, Sharon S. Armstrong, J., entered April 8,1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
SERVICE BULLETIN

N° SB 047 – CS – Rev. 1

Approved by TECNAM under DOA privileges EASA.21J.335 4

th April 2011 DO-047-110404

Page 1 / 3

Edition 1 Rev. 1

INFORMATION  RECOMMENDED  MANDATORY 

SUBJECT: P2006T LG Emergency accumulator inspection

SCOPE: During an inspection of a P2006T a deformation was detected 

on the lower side of the emergency accumulator (P/N 22-9-

610-000). 

Tecnam recommends to perform a dedicated inspection on 

the above mentioned emergency accumulator within the 

terms herein reported. 

MODELS AFFECTED: P2006T up to s/n 065

TIME OF COMPLIANCE: Before next flight. If the inspection shows no damage, the 

inspection must be repeated every 25 flight hours. 

MANPOWER: 0.5 man-hour

REQUIRED MATERIAL: Nil

TOOLING: Nil

WEIGHT AND BALANCE Nil

REFERENCES: P2006T Maintenance Manual doc. Nr. 2006/045 – ed2 rev0;

PUBBLICATIONS AFFECTED: Nil

For further information, please contact Tecnam at:

Tel 0039 0823 620134

Fax 0039 0823 622899

E-mail airworthiness@tecnam.com 
 

SERVICE BULLETIN

N° SB 047 – CS – Rev. 1

Approved by TECNAM under DOA privileges EASA.21J.335 4

th April 2011 DO-047-110404

Page 2 / 3

Edition 1 Rev. 1

INSTRUCTIONS OF INSPECTION

1. Aircraft preparation

1. Park the aircraft in a closed hangar

2. Make sure that landing gear is down and locked (Master Switch ON: LG advisory lights must be 

ON);

3. MASTER SWITCH: OFF

4. STARTER RELAY BREAKER: OFF

5. PARKING BRAKE: ON

6. Remove the inspection caps n°F8 “Hydraulic pump cap” and n°F3 “Autopilot pitch trim servo

cap”, refer to AMM Chapter 06 “Dimensions and inspections caps” – paragraph 06-10 

“INSPECTION CAPS”;

2. Inspect the Emergency Accumulator

Inspect (using a high spot light and an inspection mirror) the lower and the higher side of the emergency accumulator cylinder for absence of crack or deformations (refer to example furnished in the following figure)

and check also for oil leakage. 

If a crack or a deformation or an oil leakage is found during the accumulator inspections required by this SB,

the unit must be considered unserviceable and must be replaced in accordance with AMM instructions.

Complete the inspection report hereby attached and send it Tecnam.

Reinstall the inspection caps F3 and F8.

Record the application of the present Service Bulletin on the aircraft log-book. 
 

Inspection report Date: 

Reference: SB n° 047-CS Rev. 1

Aircraft Type: Engine:

Serial No. “ Serial No.

Registration markings: “ Time Since New:

A/C Time Since New: “ Time Since Overhaul:

“ Cycles since new: “ Cycles since new

Affected Item (if applicable)

“ ATA Chapter

“ Time Since New:

“ Time Since Overhaul:

“ Cycles since new:

Place:

Operator’s name:

“ contacts: Ph: Fax. 

“ contact person: Mobile: 

Result of the inspection: 

Operators must fill this “Inspection Report” as soon as possible and send preferably via e-mail to the TECNAM Office of 

Airworthiness: airworthiness@tecnam.com 

Eventually by fax: +39 0823 622899or express courier: 1°trav. Via Maiorise, 81043 Capua (CE), Italy

ANY MATERIAL AVAILABLE LIKE PHOTO, VIDEO, DRAWINGS ETC. IS WELCOME.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Economic Status of University Women in the U.S.A.: Report of the Committee on Economic and Legal Status of Women, American Association of University Women in Cooperation with the Women's Bureau, United States Department of Labor

              																	United States. Women's Bureau					,	American Association of University Women					 and 	Kingsbury, Susan M., 1870-1949. 						*Economic Status of University Women in the U.S.A.: Report of the Committee on Economic and Legal Status of Women, American Association of University Women in Cooperation with the Women's Bureau, United States Department of Labor : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 170*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1939,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5443,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 19 (Friday, January 28, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5236-5237]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-1963]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7313]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Pastel Portraits: Images of 18th-Century Europe''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat.

[[Page 5237]]

2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority 
No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of 
August 28, 2000, I hereby determine that the objects to be included in 
the exhibition ``Pastel Portraits: Images of 18th-Century Europe,'' 
imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, 
are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Metropolitan 
Museum of Art, New York, NY, from on or about May 17, 2011, until on or 
about August 14, 2011, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues 
yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of 
these Determinations is ordered to be published in the Federal 
Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol B. Epstein, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202/632-6473). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-
5, L/PD, Fifth Floor, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: January 24, 2011.
Ann Stock,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-1963 Filed 1-27-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000355999
<NAME> UNITED STATIONERS INC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          18,993
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  275,993
<ALLOWANCES>                                    12,561
<INVENTORY>                                    607,682
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               914,531
<PP&E>                                         286,395
<DEPRECIATION>                                 118,851
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,279,903
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          498,983
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,721
<OTHER-SE>                                     402,288
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,279,903
<SALES>                                      3,393,045
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,393,045
<CGS>                                        2,830,968
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,830,968
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               389,315
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 6,657
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,195
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                143,567
<INCOME-TAX>                                    60,158
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             83,409
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    83,409
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.37


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**JOEL G. MUIR,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 912 MAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 8th day of March, 2016, the Petition for Allow ance of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**

**Justice Eakin did not participate in the decision of this m atter.** 

**Justice Donohue did not participate in the consideration or decision of this** 

**matter.**
Editorial Note on Part 173
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 173 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; and 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 173.5 Acrylate-acrylamide resins. Acrylate-acrylamide resins may be safely used in food under the following prescribed conditions: ( a ) The additive consists of one of the following: ( 1 ) Acrylamide-acrylic acid resin (hydrolyzed polyacrylamide) is produced by the polymerization of acrylamide with partial hydrolysis, or by copolymerization of acrylamide and acrylic acid, with the greater part of the polymer being composed of acrylamide units.
( 2 ) Sodium polyacrylate-acrylamide resin is produced by the polymerization and subsequent hydrolysis of acrylonitrile in a sodium silicate-sodium hydroxide aqueous solution, with the greater part of the polymer being composed of acrylate units.
( b ) The additive contains not more than 0.05 percent of residual monomer calculated as acrylamide.
( c ) The additive is used or intended for use as follows: ( 1 ) The additive identified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section is used as a flocculent in the clarification of beet sugar juice and liquor or cane sugar juice and liquor or corn starch hydrolyzate in an amount not to exceed 5 parts per million by weight of the juice or 10 parts per million by weight of the liquor or the corn starch hydrolyzate.
( 2 ) The additive identified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section is used to control organic and mineral scale in beet sugar juice and liquor or cane sugar juice and liquor in an amount not to exceed 2.5 parts per million by weight of the juice or liquor.
[42 FR 14526, Mar. 15, 1977, as amended at 46 FR 30494, June 9, 1981]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000891035
<NAME> CONCEPTS DIRECT, INC. YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997
<CURRENCY> U. S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       6,425,137
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  165,833
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,783,999
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,442,716
<PP&E>                                         792,199
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,486,983
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,517,737
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       212,111
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,757,135
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,486,983
<SALES>                                     51,125,844
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            51,125,844
<CGS>                                       26,833,956
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               48,563,577
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,808,203
<INCOME-TAX>                                   871,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,937,203
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,937,203
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.87
        

</TABLE>
§ 182.3225 Calcium sorbate. ( a ) *Product.* Calcium sorbate.
( b ) *Conditions of use.* This substance is generally recognized as safe when used in accordance with good manufacturing practice.
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed March 30, 2022

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21

- 0716
Lower Tribunal No. 12

- 13148 SP

________________



### United Automobile Insurance Company

, Appellant,

vs.



### Millennium Radiology, LLC, d/b/a Millennium Open MRI,
a/a/o Ali Leonardo

, Appellee.

An Appeal from the County Court for Miami

- Dade County, Chiaka
Ihekwaba , Judge.

Michael J. Neimand , for appellant.

Marks & Fleischer P.A., and Gary Marks (Ft. Lauderdale); David B. Pakula, P.A., and David B. Pakula (Pembroke Pine s) , for appellee.

Before SCALES, LINDSEY, and MILLER , JJ.

PER CURIAM.2 Appellant United Automobile Insurance Company appeals from a final

summary judgment entered in favor of Appellee Millennium Radiology, LLC.

The trial court concluded that United Automobile was collaterally estopped

from challenging the reasonableness of the cost of MRI procedures that

Millennium performed. For the reasons set f orth in United Automobile

Insurance Co. v. Millennium Radiology, LLC , 47 Fla. L. Weekly D175 (Fla.

3d DCA Jan. 12, 2022) , which addressed the same issue, we reverse. 1

Reversed and remanded.

1 We recognize that the trial court did not have the benefit of this recent
decision.
[No. 36162-7-I.

Division One.

October 27, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Lopez Bible, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 94-1-05220-5, George A. Finkle, J., entered December 19, 1994. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Exhibit 99.14

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTIION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tonga Capital Corp (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  June 30, 2003 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report").  I , Roger Juhnke,
Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC 1350, as
adopted pursuant to 906 of the  Sarbancs-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge and belief.

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



                                     /s/ Roger Juhnke
                                     Roger Juhnke, Chief Executive Officer &
                                                   Chief Financial Officer

Dated: September 2, 2003
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear at 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 117.277 Timeframe for issuing a decision on an appeal. ( a ) If you appeal the order without requesting a hearing, the presiding officer must issue a written report that includes a final decision confirming or revoking the withdrawal by the 10th calendar day after the appeal is filed.
( b ) If you appeal the order and request an informal hearing: ( 1 ) If FDA grants the request for a hearing and the hearing is held, the presiding officer must provide a 2-calendar day opportunity for the hearing participants to review and submit comments on the report of the hearing under § 117.270(c)(4), and must issue a final decision within 10-calendar days after the hearing is held; or
( 2 ) If FDA denies the request for a hearing, the presiding officer must issue a final decision on the appeal confirming or revoking the withdrawal within 10 calendar days after the date the appeal is filed.
Editorial Note on Part 312
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 312 appear at 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004.

§ 312.62 Investigator recordkeeping and record retention. ( a ) *Disposition of drug.* An investigator is required to maintain adequate records of the disposition of the drug, including dates, quantity, and use by subjects. If the investigation is terminated, suspended, discontinued, or completed, the investigator shall return the unused supplies of the drug to the sponsor, or otherwise provide for disposition of the unused supplies of the drug under § 312.59.
( b ) *Case histories.* An investigator is required to prepare and maintain adequate and accurate case histories that record all observations and other data pertinent to the investigation on each individual administered the investigational drug or employed as a control in the investigation. Case histories include the case report forms and supporting data including, for example, signed and dated consent forms and medical records including, for example, progress notes of the physician, the individual's hospital chart(s), and the nurses' notes. The case history for each individual shall document that informed consent was obtained prior to participation in the study.
( c ) *Record retention.* An investigator shall retain records required to be maintained under this part for a period of 2 years following the date a marketing application is approved for the drug for the indication for which it is being investigated; or, if no application is to be filed or if the application is not approved for such indication, until 2 years after the investigation is discontinued and FDA is notified.
[52 FR 8831, Mar. 19, 1987, as amended at 52 FR 23031, June 17, 1987; 61 FR 57280, Nov. 5, 1996; 67 FR 9586, Mar. 4, 2002]