alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I, Daniel W. Dowe, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
(principal executive and principal financial officer) of the Company, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, certify that:

      (1)   In connection with the Annual Report of Novex Systems International,
            Inc. ("the Company") on Form 10-KSB for the twelve month period
            ended May 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
            Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), fully complies with
            the requirements of Section 13(a) and Section 15(d) of the
            Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
            of the Company for the periods presented therein.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                              By: /s/ Daniel W. Dowe
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Daniel W. Dowe
                                                  Chief Executive Officer and
                                                  Chief Financial Officer

                                              Date: January 19, 2004
Exhibit 31.1

 

# **CERTIFICATION**

# ** **

I, Terrence J. Scully,certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed thisannual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containing distributionor servicing reports filed in respect of periods included in the year coveredby this annual report, of Target Credit Card Master Trust;

 

# **2.Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of theperiod covered by this annual report;**

# ** **

3. Based on my knowledge,the distribution or servicing information required to be provided to the trusteeby the servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, forinclusion in these reports is included in these reports;

 

4. I am responsible forreviewing the activities performed by the servicer under the pooling andservicing, or similar, agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annualcompliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in thereports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and

 

5. The reports discloseall significant deficiencies relating to the servicer’s compliance with theminimum servicing standards based upon the report provided by an independentpublic accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the UniformSingle Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as setforth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included inthese reports.

 

 
| Dated: March 21, 2007 | By:  /s/ Terrence J. Scully |
|-----------------------|----------------------------------|
|                  | Terrence J. Scully,              |
|                  | Vice President and  Director     |
|                  | Target Receivables  Corporation  |
Editorial Note on Part 184
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 184 appear at 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; and 81 FR 49897, July 29, 2016.

§ 184.1307 Ferric sulfate. ( a ) Ferric sulfate (iron (III) sulfate, Fe2(SO4)3 CAS Reg. No. 10028-22-5) is a yellow substance that may be prepared by oxidizing iron (II) sulfate or by treating ferric oxide or ferric hydroxide with sulfuric acid.
( b ) The ingredient must be of a purity suitable for its intended use.
( c ) In accordance with § 184.1(b)(1), the ingredient is used in food as a flavoring agent as defined in § 170.3(o)(12) of this chapter, with no limitation other than current good manufacturing practice.
( d ) Prior sanctions for this ingredient different from the uses established in this section do not exist or have been waived.
[53 FR 16865, May 12, 1988, as amended at 73 FR 8607, Feb. 14, 2008]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6423
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MARION BROOKS PERSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (CR-96-140-F, CA-01-445-5-F) Submitted: May 15, 2003 Decided: May 28, 2003 Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marion Brooks Person, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Marion Brooks Person seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) and denying reconsideration of that order. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Person has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right as to either order. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 123 S. Ct. 1029 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). Further, we deny Person’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Editorial Note on Part 355
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 355 appear at 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004.

§ 355.60 Professional labeling. ( a ) The labeling for anticaries fluoride treatment rinses identified in § 355.10(a)(3) and (c)(3) that are specially formulated so they may be swallowed (fluoride supplements) and are provided to health professionals (but not to the general public) may contain the following additional dosage information: Children 3 to under 14 years of age: As a supplement in areas where the water supply is nonfluoridated (less than 0.3 parts per million (ppm)), clean the teeth with a toothpaste and rinse with 5 milliliters (mL) of 0.02 percent or 10 mL of 0.01 percent fluoride ion rinse daily, then swallow. When the water supply contains 0.3 to 0.7 ppm fluoride ion, reduce the dose to 2.5 mL of 0.02 percent or 5 mL of 0.01 percent fluoride ion rinse daily.
( b ) The labeling for products marketed to health to health professionals in package sizes larger than those specified in § 355.20 shall include the statements: “For Professional Office Use Only” and “This product is not intended for home or unsupervised consumer use.”
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Christie Lynn Darlin, Appellant

No. 06-13-00111-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 354th District Court of 

Hunt County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 28537). 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss, 

Justice Carter and Justice Moseley

participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the motion of the appellant to 

dismiss the appeal should be granted. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We note that the appellant, Christie Lynn Darlin, has adequately indicated her inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JULY 11, 2013

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
J-S77024-16

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

Appellee

v.

SHANTE BRUCE RICE,

Appellant No. 48 MDA 2016

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence December 16, 2014

in the Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County

Criminal Division at No.: CP-21-CR-0003481-2012

BEFORE: PANELLA, J., OLSON, J., and PLATT, J.*

CONCURRING AND DISSENTING MEMORANDUM BY PLATT, J.:

 FILED: MAY 2, 2017 

I respectfully concur in part and dissent in part. I concur with the 

learned Majority’s affirmance of judgment of sentence. However, I am 

compelled to dissent from the Majority’s vacation of Appellant’s conviction 

and sentence for criminal conspiracy to commit second-degree murder. I 

agree with the reasoning of the learned trial court, that the outcome of this 

issue is controlled by the holding of our Supreme Court in Commonwealth 

v. Weimer, 977 A.2d 1103 (Pa. 2009). (See Trial Court Opinion, 5/05/16, 

at 16). The Weimer Court held, in pertinent part:

____________________________________________

* Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.
J-S77024-16

- 2 -

One may certainly be convicted of conspiracy to commit 

homicide, and the jury’s decision to convict of murder in the 

third degree does not render the preexisting conspiracy a 

nonentity.

Put another way, the ultimate gradation of the crime 

accomplished does not in and of itself delimit the degree of crime 

originally planned─the crime ultimately accomplished does not 

retroactively limit the scope of the original conspiracy. A jury’s 

determination of the degree of homicide accomplished does not 

limit the conspiracy’s scope. If appellant conspired to 

intentionally, knowingly, recklessly, or negligently cause the 

death of [the victim], she may be found guilty regardless of 

which of those adverbs are found or not found by the jury.

Id. at 1105.1 See Commonwealth v. Fisher, 80 A.3d 1186, 1195 (Pa. 

2013) (holding conspiracy to commit third degree murder is cognizable 

offense); see also Roebuck, supra at 624 (conviction for murder of third 

degree supportable under complicity theory where Commonwealth proves 

accomplice acted with culpable mental state required of a principal actor, 

namely, malice).2 I would affirm the judgment of sentence in its entirety.

Accordingly, I respectfully concur in part and dissent in part. 

____________________________________________

1 Similarly, in my view, the Majority’s reliance on Commonwealth v. 

Geathers, 847 A.2d 730, 734 (Pa. Super. 2004) is misplaced. (See

Majority, at **22-23 n.6). “[C]onspiracy, attempt, and complicity are 

distinct legal principles with different requirements for mental culpability.” 

Commonwealth v. Roebuck, 32 A.3d 613, 622 (Pa. 2011) (citation 

omitted). 

2 Accord, Commonwealth v. Nunez, 459 A.2d 376, 376 (Pa. Super. 1983) 

(holding evidence sufficient to affirm both second-degree murder and 

conspiracy to murder convictions). 
J-S77024-16

- 3 -
<PAGE>


                     Consent of Anders, Minkler & Diehl LLP

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Amended Annual Report on 
Form 10-K/A, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by NHP 
Incorporated (NHP) of our reports dated February 3, 6, 9, 11, 14, 15 and 20, 
1995 with respect to the audits of these Partnerships:

<TABLE>
    <S>                                           <C>

    Pershing Waterman Phase I      (DB I)          Caroline Associates I
    PW III Associates              (DB II)         Columbus Square Associates I
    PW IV Associates               (DB III)        Columbus Square Associates II
    PW V Associates                (DB IV)         Savoy Court Associates
    PW VI Associates               (DB V)          Wigar, Ltd. (Winter Garden)

</TABLE>


for the year ended December 31, 1994, and the incorporation by reference of 
such reports into NHP's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-11933), 
NHP's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-11863), NHP's Registration 
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-11917), NHP's Registration Statement on Form 
S-8 (No. 333-11857), and NHP's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 
333-08137).


/s/ Anders, Minkler & Diehl LLP

   
St. Louis, Missouri
October 27, 1997
From : Sharon Nizich/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Sent : 05/02/2012 03:21 PM

To : "Higgins, Cortney" < Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov >, Keith

Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Peter Westlin/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Steven

Silverman/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Steffan Johnson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Charlotte

Bertrand/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Tom Walton/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Amy

Lamson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc :

Subject : Discussion on May 7 regarding Portland Cement

Please note an outline is attached for our preliminary discussion on the Portland Cement

Reconsideration Package.

(See attached file: Portland Cement summary of proposal May 2012.docx)

Sharon V. Nizich

Minerals and Manufacturing Group (MMG)

Sector Policies and Programs Division

OAQPS

- US EPA

RTP NC 2771 1

919/541

- 2825
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Tonga  Capital  Corp  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report").  I,
Robert E. Degeyter, Chief Financial Officer of the company, certify, pursuant to
18 USC Section  1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.




                                    /s/ Robert E. Degeyter
                                    --------------------------------
                                    Robert E. Degeyter, Chief Financial Officer
Dated: November 22, 2006
Editorial Note on Part 314
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 314 appear at 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004; 81 FR 69639, Oct. 6, 2016.

§ 314.71 Procedures for submission of a supplement to an approved application. ( a ) Only the applicant may submit a supplement to an application.
( b ) All procedures and actions that apply to an application under § 314.50 also apply to supplements, except that the information required in the supplement is limited to that needed to support the change. A supplement is required to contain an archival copy and a review copy that include an application form and appropriate technical sections, samples, and labeling; except that a supplement for a change other than a change in labeling is required also to contain a field copy.
( c ) All procedures and actions that apply to applications under this part, including actions by applicants and the Food and Drug Administration, also apply to supplements except as specified otherwise in this part.
[50 FR 7493, Feb. 22, 1985, as amended at 50 FR 21238, May 23, 1985; 58 FR 47352, Sept. 8, 1993; 67 FR 9586, Mar. 4, 2002; 73 FR 39609, July 10, 2008]
Editorial Note on Part 184
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 184 appear at 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; and 81 FR 49897, July 29, 2016.

§ 184.1973 Beeswax (yellow and white). ( a ) Beeswax (CAS Reg. No. 8012-89-3) is a secretory product of honey bees used as a structural material in honeycombs. Beeswax is prepared from honeycombs after removal of the honey by draining or centrifuging. The combs are melted in hot water or steam or with solar heat, and strained. The wax is refined by melting in hot water to which sulfuric acid or alkali may be added to extract impurities. The resulting wax is referred to as yellow beeswax. White beeswax is produced by bleaching the constituent pigments of yellow beeswax with peroxides, or preferably it is bleached by sun light.
( b ) The ingredient meets the specifications of the “Food Chemicals Codex,” 3d Ed. (1981), pp. 34-35, which is incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the National Academy Press, 2101 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20418, or may be examined at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .*
( c ) The ingredient is used as a flavoring agent and adjuvant as defined in § 170.3(o)(12) of this chapter, as a lubricant as defined in § 170.3(o)(18) of this chapter, and as a surface-finishing agent as defined in § 170.3(o)(30) of this chapter.
( d ) The ingredient is used in food, in accordance with § 184.1(b)(1) of this chapter, at levels not to exceed good manufacturing practice. Current good manufacturing practice results in a maximum level, as served, of: 0.065 percent for chewing gum as defined in § 170.3(n)(6) of this chapter; 0.005 percent for confections and frostings as defined in § 170.3(n)(9) of this chapter; 0.04 percent for hard candy as defined in § 170.3(n)(25) of this chapter; 0.1 percent for soft candy as defined in § 170.3(n)(38) of this chapter; and 0.002 percent or less for all other food categories.
[43 FR 14644, Apr. 7, 1978, as amended at 49 FR 5613, Feb. 14, 1984; 50 FR 49536, Dec. 3, 1985]
# Table6

Table 6. Summary statistics of mineral content of soils by formation (Page, 2005) determined by x-ray diffraction.		

# Sheet2

# Sheet3
# m8945.docx

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 19.06.2018 C(2018) 3965 final To the Notifying Party Subject : Case M . 8945 – PERMIRA / CISCO (TARGET BUSINESSES ) Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 1 and Article 57 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area 2 Dear Sir or Madam, 1. On 23 May 2018 , the European Commission received notification of a proposed conc entration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which the undertaking Private equity funds, ultimately controlled by Permira Holdings Limited (' Permira ', UK) acquire s within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control over the whole of the undertaking Service Provider Video Software and Solutions ('SPVSS') business segments controlled by Cisco Systems, Inc ('Cisco', US) by way of purchase of assets . 3 2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are: - for Permira : private equity business engaged in the provision of investment management services to a number of investment funds. Permira controls a number of portfolio companies which are active in a variety of sectors across a range of jurisdictions. - for Cisco's Service Provider Video Software and Solutions ('SPVSS'): supplies digital technology and services, including video processing and recording solutions and cloud-based platform services, to digital pay-TV service providers and content providers. 3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5 ( b ) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 . 4 4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1 )( b) of the Merger Regulation and Article 57 of the EEA Agreement . For the Commission ( Signed )
Johannes LAITENBERGER Director - General
(1)
OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ( the ' Merger Regulation ' ). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( ' TFEU ' ) has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of ' Community ' by ' Union ' and ' common market ' by ' internal market ' . The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.
(2) OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3 ( the ' EEA Agreement ' ).
(3) Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 185 , 30 . 5 . 2018 , p. 6 .
(4)
OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5 .
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32 (b)

       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.CSECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northland Cable Properties
      Seven Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10Q for the period
      ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
      on the date hereof (the "Form 10-Q"), I, Gary Jones, President of
      Northland Communications Corporation, the General Partner, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;

            (1)   The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13 (a) or (15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
                  U.S.C. 78m or 78(d)); and

            (2)   The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Partnership.

      DATE: 8-15-05

      /s/  GARY S. JONES
           ---------------------------
           Gary S. Jones
           President

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Northland Cable Properties Seven Limited Partnership and will be
retained by Northland Cable Properties Seven Limited Partnership and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>     DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>          SEP-30-1998

<CASH>                       49,102,729 
<SECURITIES>                       0    
<RECEIVABLES>                53,123,144 
<ALLOWANCES>                  1,210,935 
<INVENTORY>                 166,087,554 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   0    
<PP&E>                       71,666,615 
<DEPRECIATION>               29,930,097 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>              320,781,473 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              0    
<BONDS>                            0    
<COMMON>                           0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0    
<PREFERRED>                        0    
<OTHER-SE>                  178,653,092 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>320,781,473 
<SALES>                     224,840,149 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>            224,840,149 
<CGS>                       177,285,068 
<TOTAL-COSTS>               177,285,068 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>             12,810,270 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 0    
<INCOME-PRETAX>              34,744,811 
<INCOME-TAX>                       0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>          34,744,811 
<DISCONTINUED>                     0    
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0    
<CHANGES>                          0    
<NET-INCOME>                 34,744,811 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                     79.05 
<EPS-DILUTED>                     79.05 

        

</TABLE>