alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 6075

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. COBEY DARON WEBB , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Roanoke

. Glen E. Conrad, Chief District Judge. ( 7:05

- cr - 00102

- GEC

- RSB

- 1; 7:16

- cv 81213

- GEC

- RSB )

Submitted : May 16, 2017 Decided: May 17, 2017

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Cobey Daron Webb, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Cobey Daron Webb seeks to appeal the d istrict court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion without prejudice as successive . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable j urists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on proce dural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the re cord and conclude that Webb has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials b efore this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
# L_2019008EN.01003801.xml

| 10.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 8/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 8/38

---

Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1605 of 25 October 2018 implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1755 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Burundi

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 268 of 26 October 2018
  )

On page 19, in the table, under the heading ‘Name’:

for:

‘Mathias/Joseph NIYONZIMA’,

read:

‘Mathias-Joseph NIYONZIMA’.

---
----

----

| 1. Execution date        | November 17, 2011.                                                                                                                           |
|--------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. Parties               | -Comunidad de Regantes de Lorca-Rodríguez II Parque Solar, S.L.                                                                         |
| 3. Term                  | Twenty five (25) years since November 17, 2011.                                                                                              |
| 4. Extension and Renewal | The initial term can be automatically extended by successive periods of two (2) years, up to a maximum term extension of sixteen (16) years. |
| 5. Annual Rent           | EUR 980 multiplied by the surface leased per annum.                                                                                          |

----

 1 The original language version is on file with the Registrant and is available upon request.

----

| 1. Execution date        | August 16, 2007, as amended on March 31, 2008, and December 22, 2010 and December 14, 2011.                                                                               |
|--------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. Parties               | -Mr. José Giner Gallego-Rodríguez II Parque Solar, S.L.                                                                                                         |
| 3. Term                  | Twenty five (25) years since the date of registration at the RIPRE (November 18, 2011).                                                                                   |
| 4. Extension and Renewal | The initial term will be automatically extended by successive periods of five (5) years, up to a maximum term extension of fifteen (15) years.                            |
| 5. Annual Rent           | EUR 5,000 per hectare, annually.                                                                                                                                          |
| 6. Easements             | (i) right of way and (ii) right of easement for the Installation of underground way for electric energy granted in favor of Iberdrola Distribución Electrica, S.A.U. |

----

----
6/9/2014 10:15 AM

Att. 007

Processing and Use Operations at Submitter’s Facility
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 20-1671

___________________________ Corey E. Fisherman lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v. Jared McGriff, also known as Jered McGreiff; Bradley Dupre, M.D.; Kristin

Jacobs; Vicki Dean-Gramlich; Jack Serier lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees Kristin, RN Pro M-H lllllllllllllllllllll

Defendant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota

____________ Submitted: December 21, 2020 Filed: December 28, 2020 [Unpublished]

____________ Before GRUENDER, ERICKSON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM.Corey Fisherman appeals following the district court’s 1 adverse grant of

summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having carefully reviewed the record, we find no basis for reversal. See Odom v. Kaizer , 864 F.3d 920, 921 (8th Cir. 2017) (grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo); Carter v. Arkansas , 392 F.3d 965, 968 (8th Cir. 2004) (dismissal for failure to state a claim is reviewed de novo). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

1 The Honorable Patrick J. Schiltz, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Elizabeth Cowan Wright, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota. -2-
38837.

#### VEAL v. EAGLE FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY.

Townsend, Presiding Judge.

1. Under *Code*§ 19-206 it is necessary that in all applications for certiorari in civil cases bond be given in an amount approved by the trial' judge and that such judge certify under his own signature that the '‘•bond has been approved and that the costs have been paid; otherwise the certiorari is void. *Hester v. Keller,*74 Ga. 369; *Dykes v. Twiggs County,*115 Ga. 698 (42 S. E. 36); *Southern Ry. Co. v. Oliver,*13 Ga. App. 5 (78 S. E. 684); *Georgian Co. v. Sutton,*18 Ga. App. 507 (89 S. E. 601). Approval of the bond by the clerk,' or certification by the clerk or other officer that the costs have been paid, is in- sufficient. *Tippins v. DeLoach,*9 Ga. App. 362 (71 S. E. 497); *Southeastern Mutual Fire Ins. Co. v. Davidson,*25 Ga. App. 83 (1) (102 S. E. 460); *Davis v. Joiner,*1 Ga. App. 106 (2) (58 S. E. 62); *Ray v. Cruce,*18 Ga. App. 265 (89 S. E. 302); *Thoms v. John R. Thompson Co.,*38 Ga. App. 779 (145 S. E. 533).

2. Assuming that á statute creating a 'city or county court and prescribing a special method’ for suing • out certiorari varying’the'general law on that subject would be valid in the absence of proper attack, there is' nothing in the act creating the City Court of Buford (Ga. L. 1906, 'p. 176 et seq.) which allots the clerk to approve the bond or certify that the bond fias' been accepted or the costs'paid, rather than the 'judge who is required by statute so tó do. Section '46 provides that certiorari shall issue as in- the case' of county courts under the’ Code of 1895, " which contained the-same provision as oúr present *Code*§ 19-206. The'exception' made in *Harte v. Sturtevant,*20 Ga. App. 822 (93 S. E. 530) ''was based on the fact that the act creating 'the Múnicipal Court óf Savannah not only'expressly gave the clerk of that court ■ the power to a-pprov'e' boridsj but also to perform all fúnctions ■ of a ministerial character which might under the law be performed by'justices bf the peace'.' 'T-he'abt creating the City Court of Buford gives no' such broad' powers to the clerk.

3. The record showing that'the' bond was' accepted,''approved and' certifiéd by' the' clérk'on'ly; as was the ’certificate that the costs'had been‘paid, it was' error -for’the Judge'o'f the ■ Superior Court’ of Gwinnett County ’to overrule 'the motion to'dismiss 'the petition for Certiorari based' on these facts.

*758Decided May 12, 1961

Rehearing denied May 31, 1961.

*Joseph E. Cheele*for plaintiff in error.

*Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Murphy, Frank Love, Jr., Glyndon C. Pruitt,*contra.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Frankum and Jordan, JJ., concur.*
Exhibit
32.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report of Astea International Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Rick Etskovitz,
Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial and Chief Accounting Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:








(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and








(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

















/s/Rick
      EtskovitzRick
      EtskovitzChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)March
      31, 2009








84
Office for Domestic Preparedness 

U.S. Department of Homeland Security 

Washington, DC 20531

ODP Information Bulletin 

No. 190 September 16, 2005 

TO All State Administrative Agency Heads 

 All State Administrative Agency Points of Contact 

 All State Homeland Security Directors 

FROM: Matt A. Mayer 

Acting Executive Director 

SUBJECT: State and Urban Area Homeland Security Strategy Update Extension 

As introduced in Information Bulletin No. 183, States and FY2005 Urban Areas are required to 

update their Homeland Security Strategies to ensure that they support the National Preparedness 

Goal and reflect the seven National Priorities. 

Late last month, our Nation suffered the enormous tragedy of Hurricane Katrina. It is critically 

important that near-term efforts as a Nation be dedicated to the ongoing recovery efforts in the 

Gulf States. In light of this situation, the Office of Domestic Preparedness (ODP) is extending 

the deadline for strategy submission by one month. States and FY2005 Urban Areas must 

submit their updated Homeland Security Strategies to ODP by October 31, 2005. 

Additional questions may be directed to your Preparedness Officer or the Centralized Scheduling 

and Information Desk (CSID) at askcsid@dhs.gov, 1-800-368-6498. CSID hours of operation 

are from 8:00 a.m. – 7:00 p.m. (EST), Monday-Friday.
Exhibit
15.2





To the
Board of Directors and Partners of


Icahn
Enterprises L.P.





We are
aware of the inclusion in Icahn Enterprises L.P.’s Form 10-Q/A for the quarter
ended March 31, 2009 and the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Forms S-3 Nos. 333-126069 and 333-143930 and Form S-4
No. 333-143929) of Icahn Enterprises L.P. of our report dated May 5, 2009
relating to the unaudited consolidated interim financial statements of
Federal-Mogul Corporation that are included in Federal-Mogul Corporation’s Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009.





/s/
      Ernst & Young LLP





Detroit,
Michigan


August 4,
2009
Editorial Note on Part 312
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 312 appear at 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004.

§ 312.55 Informing investigators. ( a ) Before the investigation begins, a sponsor (other than a sponsor-investigator) shall give each participating clinical investigator an investigator brochure containing the information described in § 312.23(a)(5).
( b ) The sponsor shall, as the overall investigation proceeds, keep each participating investigator informed of new observations discovered by or reported to the sponsor on the drug, particularly with respect to adverse effects and safe use. Such information may be distributed to investigators by means of periodically revised investigator brochures, reprints or published studies, reports or letters to clinical investigators, or other appropriate means. Important safety information is required to be relayed to investigators in accordance with § 312.32.
[52 FR 8831, Mar. 19, 1987, as amended at 52 FR 23031, June 17, 1987; 67 FR 9586, Mar. 4, 2002]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000945532
<NAME> USABANCSHARES, INC.
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                         253,969
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       5,718,210
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  2,843,592
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       8,604,932
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         8,592,963
<LOANS>                                      8,791,915
<ALLOWANCE>                                     60,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              26,703,743
<DEPOSITS>                                  21,840,413
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            163,248
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       597,082
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,103,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              26,703,743
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                231,270
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              164,625
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               100,631
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               496,526
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             277,170
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          219,356
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              22,063
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                272,971
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,685
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       8,685
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.45
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                60,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               60,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         60,000

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FISCAL QUARTER ENDED JUNE
30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) QUARTERLY
REPORT ON FORM 10Q FOR THE FISCAL QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          11,897
<SECURITIES>                                    15,114
<RECEIVABLES>                                   55,922
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,770
<INVENTORY>                                     48,863
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               132,503
<PP&E>                                          54,446
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,744
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 168,243
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           43,656
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           186
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,433
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   168,243
<SALES>                                         56,733
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                56,733
<CGS>                                           37,060
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   37,060
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,613
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   402
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 104
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,428
<INCOME-TAX>                                       643
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,785
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,785
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .29
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.1





CERTIFICATION





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Corporate Fraud Accountability Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted), Theodore L. Arena, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Provena Foods, Inc. (the COMPANY), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:





|1. |  | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 99.1 (the Periodic
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|2. |  | The information contained in the Periodic Report, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period
covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Dated:    August 8, 2002





/s/    Theodore L. Arena


---

Theodore L. Arena


President and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      EXHIBIT 21
                                                                      ----------

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

                                                                Jurisdiction
             Subsidiaries (a)                                   of Incorporation
             ----------------                                   ----------------

Victoria's Secret Stores, Inc. (b)                              Delaware
Cacique, Inc. (c)                                               Delaware
Victoria's Secret Catalogue, Inc. (d)                           Delaware
Bath & Body Works, Inc. (e)                                     Delaware
Gryphon Development, Inc. (f)                                   Delaware
Intimate Brands Service Corporation (g)                         Delaware



(a)      The names of certain subsidiaries are omitted since such unnamed
         subsidiaries, considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, would
         not constitute a significant subsidiary as of February 1, 1997.

(b)      Victoria's Secret Stores, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of
         Victoria's Secret Stores Holding Corporation, a Delaware corporation
         and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the registrant.

(c)      Cacique, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Cacique Holding
         Corporation, a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of
         the registrant.

(d)      Victoria's Secret Catalogue, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of
         Victoria's Secret Catalogue Holding Corporation, a Delaware corporation
         and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the registrant.

(e)      Bath & Body Works, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bath and Body
         Works Holding Corporation, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a
         wholly-owned subsidiary of the registrant.

(f)      Gryphon Development, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Gryphon
         Holding Corporation, a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned
         subsidiary of the registrant.

(g)      Intimate Brands Service Corporation is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
         registrant.