alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
WESTERN DISTRICT

IN RE: K.M.S., A MINOR

PETITION OF: A.M.S., MOTHER :

:

:

:

:

: No. 58 WM 2014

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 4 th day of September, 2014, the Petition for Leave to File Petition

for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is GRANTED . Mother is DIRECTED to file her

Petition for Allowance of Appeal by September 9, 20 14.

Justice Stevens dissents, would note counsel was n egligent, and would direct

Mother to file her Petition for Allowance of Appeal within 48 hours of the filing of this

Order.
# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted February 4, 2010 ∗ Decided February 9, 2010

Before

F RANK H. E ASTERBROOK

, Chief Judge

I LANA D IAMOND R OVNER

, Circuit Judge

T ERENCE T. E VANS

, Circuit Judge

No . 09-3164

U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA

, Plaintiff-Appellee

,

v.

C ORTEZ D. G ILLUM

, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United

States District Court for the

Central District of Illinois.

No. 02-30011
Jeanne E. Scott, Judge

.

Order

Cortez Gillum pleaded guilty to a federal crime and was sentenced in 2002. He did not appeal or file a timely petition under 28 U.S.C. §2255. But of late he has filed multiple motions asking the district court for release. Last year we informed Gillum that

the district court is not authorized to consider these motions. United States v. Gillum , No. 08-2348 (7th Cir. Mar. 3, 2009) (nonprecedential disposition). This did not deter G illum from trying again.

∗ This successive appeal has been submitted to the original panel under Operating Procedure 6(b). After examining the briefs and the record, we have concluded that oral argument is unnecessary. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); Cir. R. 34(f). NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1No. 09-3164 Page 2

His latest motion contends that the district judge lacked subject-matter jurisdiction. He appears to believe that this supplies an end around all of the statutes, rules, and doctrines that limit post-judgment challenges to criminal convictions. It does not. Jurisdictional arguments, like all others, must be presented before the judgment becomes final or the time for collateral review expires. Gillum also errs in supposing that the Interstate Agreement on Detainers, on which his latest arguments rest, affects federal jurisdiction. Every indictment for a federal crime comes within the district courts’ subject-matter jurisdiction. 18 U.S.C. §3231; United States v. Martin , 147 F.3d 529 (7th Cir. 1997). Whether or not the IAD afforded a full or partial defense to the charge does not affect the district court’s authority to resolve the dispute (which is what “subject-matter jurisdiction” means).

Gillum must understand that any further motions in the district court will expose him to sanctions, including not only a fine but also an order directing clerks to return

his motions unfiled, unless the motion makes a bona fide effort to demonstrate that it is not only within the scope of 28 U.S.C. §2255 but also timely under the criteria of §2255(f)--and that it has been authorized under §2255(h) if any of G illum’s prior

motions is deemed to be a collateral attack. See Castro v. United States , 540 U.S. 375 (2003).
§ 207.54 What listing information must a registrant submit for a drug that it salvages? A registrant who also relabels or repacks a drug that it salvages must list the drug it relabels or repacks in accordance with § 207.53 rather than in accordance with this section. A registrant who performs only salvaging with respect to a drug must provide the following listing information for that drug. ( a ) The NDC assigned to the drug immediately before the drug is received by the registrant for salvaging;
( b ) The lot number and expiration date of the salvaged drug product; and
( c ) The name and Unique Facility Identifier for each establishment where the registrant salvages the drug.
###### Editorial Note on Part 184

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 184 appear at 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; and 81 FR 49897, July 29, 2016.

#### § 184.1115 Agar-agar.

(a) Agar-agar (CAS Reg. No. PM 9002-18-0) is a dried, hydrophyllic, colloidal polysaccharide extracted from one of a number of related species of red algae (class *Rhodophyceae*).

(b) The ingredient meets the specifications of the “Food Chemicals Codex,” 3d Ed. (1981), p. 11, which is incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the National Academy Press, 2101 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20418, or may be examined at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.*

(c) The ingredient is used in food in accordance with § 184.1(b)(2) under the following conditions:

| Foods (as served) | Percent | Functions |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Baked goods and baking mixes, § 170.3(n)(1) of this chapter | 0.8 | Drying agent, § 170.3(o)(7) of this chapter; flavoring agent, § 170.3(o)(12) of this chapter; stabilizer, thickener, § 170.3(o)(28) of this chapter. |
| Confections and frostings, § 170.3(n)(9) of this chapter | 2.0 | Flavoring agent, § 170.3(o)(12) of this chapter; stabilizer, thickener, § 170.3(o)(28) of this chapter; surface finisher, § 170.3(o)(30) of this chapter. |
| Soft candy, § 170.3(n)(38) of this chapter | 1.2 | Stabilizer and thickener, § 170.3(o)(28) of this chapter. |
| All other food categories | .25 | Flavoring agent, § 170.3(o)(12) of this chapter; formulation aid, § 170.3(o)(14) of this chapter; humectant, § 170.3(o)(16) of this chapter; stabilizer, thickener, § 170.3(o)(28) of this chapter. |

Maximum Usage Levels Permitted

(d) Prior sanctions for this ingredient different from the uses established in this section do not exist or have been waived.

[44 FR 19391, Apr. 3, 1979, as amended at 49 FR 5611, Feb. 14, 1984]
#### § 211.44 Lighting.

Adequate lighting shall be provided in all areas.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1




               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




         We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" in
Amendment No. 4 to the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-72261) and
related Prospectus of NeoPath, Inc. for the registration of 2,900,000 shares of
its common stock and to the incorporation by reference therein of our report
dated February 9, 1999, with respect to the financial statements of NeoPath,
Inc. incorporated by reference in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 1998, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.




                                                           /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Seattle, Washington
August 23, 1999
IIB 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7385 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 23, 2024 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 29 Franklin Street in Petersburg, Virginia, 

as the ‘‘John Mercer Langston Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

HR 7385 RFS

1 SECTION 1. JOHN MERCER LANGSTON POST OFFICE 

2 BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 29 Franklin Street in Peters5 burg, Virginia, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘John Mercer Langston Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘John Mercer 

11 Langston Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 22, 2024. 

Attest: KEVIN F. MCCUMBER, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Consolidated Balance Sheets and Consolidated  Statements of Earnings as reported
in Exhibit 13 of the Form 10-K and is  qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  JAN-29-2000
<CASH>                                           584,000
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    182,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                    2,027,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,873,000
<PP&E>                                         6,232,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,777,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 8,353,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,838,000
<BONDS>                                        1,230,000
<COMMON>                                          30,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,650,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   8,353,000
<SALES>                                       11,862,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              11,862,000
<CGS>                                          8,321,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 278,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                80,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  440,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                     161,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              279,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                     279,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                         1.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       1.14



</TABLE>
#### § 26.2 Purpose.

The provisions of this subpart govern the exchange between the parties and normal endorsement by the receiving regulatory authority of official good manufacturing practices (GMP's) inspection reports after a transitional period aimed at determination of the equivalence of the regulatory systems of the parties, which is the cornerstone of this subpart.
Exhibit 21

                      SUBSIDIARY AND PRINCIPAL INVESTMENTS

      Subsidiaries*

      Mitel, Inc.
      U.S.A.

      Mitel Communications Solutions, Inc.
      U.S.A.

      Mitel Semiconductor, Inc.
      U.S.A.

      Mitel Telecom Limited
      Great Britain

      Mitel Semiconductor Limited
      Great Britain

      Mitel (Far East) Limited
      Hong Kong

      Mitel Semiconductor AB
      Sweden

      Mitel (Barbados) Limited
      Barbados

      Principal Investments

      Mitel de Mexico S.A. de C.V. Mexico

      Tianchi-Mitel Telecommunications Corporation

      * All  subsidiaries  are 100%  owned,  directly  or  indirectly,  by Mitel
        Corporation.
38641, 38642.

#### FULTON COUNTY v. CITIZENS & SOUTHERN NATIONAL BANK, Executor; and *vice versa.*

Decided April 5, 1961.

Rehearing denied April 14, 1961.

*510
      *Harold Sheats, Paul Anderson, Martin Peabody,*for plaintiff in error.

*Robert W. Spears, Albert G. Callaway,*contra.

Frankum, Judge.

The attorneys for the plaintiff in error state in their brief the following: “Now, as a prologue to our argument, we wish to approach the court in a spirit of honesty and frankness. The recent decisions, both of this court and of the Supreme Court, dealing with these questions, are against the position which we now take. In the case of *Woodside v. City of Atlanta,*214 Ga. p. 75 (3), the court said: ‘For the reason stated in the corresponding division of the opinion, tender to the condemnees of the assessors’ award of compensation for the property sought to be condemned, or payment of it into the registry of the court on their refusal to accfept it, was a condition precedent to the condemnor’s, right to file and prosecute an appeal to a jury in the Superior Coúrt of Fulton County.’ The above ruling of the Supreme Court was followed by this court in the three cases reported in 99 Ga. App. 24, and the case of *State Highway Department v. Wilson,*98 Ga. App. 619, et seq.; and, in this latter case, the Supreme Court denied our application for certiorari. Thus, we are compelled to face up to the fact that, in order for this court to sustain our position and reverse the court below in the instant case, it will be necessary for this court not to only reverse its position in the above cited cases, but that it would also be necessary for this court to undertake to reverse the above quoted ruling of the Supreme Court in the *Woodside*case. We are neither stupid nor so naive as to be able to delude ourselves into the belief that we have any chance whatsoever of getting this court to deliver such an opinion. However, as to this case, this court is the ‘door’ through which we must enter if we are to get this question again before the Supreme Court.”

The instant case is controlled by the decision in *Woodside v. City of Atlanta,*214 Ga. 75 (103 S. E. 2d 108).

*511Because the judgment complained of in the main bill of exceptions disposes of the case in the trial court, the cross-bill will not be considered and is dismissed. *Code Ann.*§ 6-901; *Statham v. Saxon,*210 Ga. 369 (80 S. E. 2d 182).

*Judgment affirmed on main bill of exceptions; cross-bill dismissed.*

*Townsend, P. J., Carlisle and Jordan, JJ., concur.*
#### § 20.29 Prohibition on withdrawal of records from Food and Drug Administration files.

No person may withdraw records submitted to the Food and Drug Administration. All Food and Drug Administration records shall be retained by the agency until disposed of pursuant to routine record disposal procedures.

[42 FR 15616, Mar. 22, 1977, as amended at 68 FR 25285, May 12, 2003]
# United States Court of Appeals
**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

R+L CARRIERS, INC., Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

PITT OHIO EXPRESS INC., Defendant

- Appellee.

______________________

2012

- 1471

______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio (Cincinnati) in No. 10

- CV

- 0090, Judge Sandra S. Beckwith.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

A NTHONY C. W HITE , Thompson Hine, LLP, of C olumbus, Ohio, argued for plaintiff

- appell ant. With him on

the brief were M EGAN D. D ORTENZO , of Cleveland, Ohio,

and S TEPHEN J. B UTLER , of Cincinnati, Ohio. Of counsel

was T ROY S. P RINCE , of Cleveland, Ohio.

G RETCHEN L. J ANKOWSKI , Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney, PC, of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, argued for

defendant

- appellee. With her on the brief was M ICHAEL
L. D EVER

.

______________________T HIS CAUSE HAVING BEEN HEARD AN D CONSIDERED

, IT IS

O RDERED AND A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (N EWMAN

, P ROST , and O’M ALLEY

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

February 6, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly

Date Jan Horbaly

C lerk
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Maternity Benefits Under Union Contract: Health Insurance Plans

              																	United States. Women's Bureau. 						*Maternity Benefits Under Union Contract: Health Insurance Plans : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 214*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1947,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5485,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
EXHIBIT 31

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Theodore L. Arena, and I, Thomas J. Mulroney, each separately certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Provena Foods Inc. (the Company);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;

4. The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and l5d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,
or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including any subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of
directors:

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud. whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 4, 2006



/s/ Theodore L. ArenaTheodore L. Arena, Chief Executive Officer/s/ Thomas J. MulroneyThomas J. Mulroney, Chief Financial Officer
EX-10.4a



 Exhibit 10.4(a) 

SECOND LIEN SECURITY AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENT 

August 22, 2014 
 Reference
is hereby made to that certain Second Lien Security Agreement, dated as of July 25, 2014 (as amended, amended and restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Second Lien Security
Agreement”) among Advantage Sales & Marketing Inc. (as successor-in-interest to Karman Buyer Corp.), a Delaware corporation (the
“Borrower”), Karman Intermediate Corp., a Delaware corporation, the Subsidiary Guarantors party thereto and Bank of America, N.A., as Collateral Agent. Unless otherwise defined herein, capitalized terms defined in the Second Lien
Security Agreement and used herein shall have the meanings given to them in the Second Lien Security Agreement. 
 The undersigned, in his
capacity as a Responsible Officer of Borrower, hereby certifies, on behalf of Borrower and not in his individual or personal capacity and without personal liability, that, as of the date hereof, the information below, in addition to information
delivered to the Collateral Agent on or prior to the date hereof supplements certain information described in the Second Lien Security Agreement delivered on the Closing Date: 

SUPPLEMENT TO SCHEDULE II TO SECURITY AGREEMENT 

PLEDGED EQUITY; PLEDGED DEBT 
  

													
	 Grantor
	  	 Current Legal

Owned
 Entities
	  	 Type of

Organization
	  	Certificate
No.	  	No. of
Shares/Interest
Issued	  	No. Shares/
Interest
Owned	 	Percent
of Owned
Interest
Pledged
	 Advantage Sales & Marketing Inc.
	  	Advantage Consumer Healthcare LLC	  	Limited Liability Company	  	N/A	  	N/A	  	100%	 	100%

 [Signature page follows] 

  
 1 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Security Agreement Supplement to be executed
as of the date first above written by its officer thereunto duly authorized. 
  

			
	ADVANTAGE SALES & MARKETING, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Robert Murray

	Name:	 	Robert Murray
	Title:	 	Treasurer
§ 186.1750 Sodium chlorite. ( a ) Sodium chlorite (NaCLO2, CAS Reg. No. 7758-19-2) exists as slightly hygroscopic white crystals or flakes. It is manufactured by passing chlorine dioxide into a solution of sodium hydroxide and hydrogen peroxide.
( b ) the ingredient is used at levels from 125 to 250 parts per million as a slimicide in the manufacture of paper and paperboard that contact food.
[45 FR 16470, Mar. 14, 1980]