January 13, 2016

Exemption No. 13206A Regulatory Docket No. FAA

– 2015

– 2276

Mr. Curtis Zoller Associate Dean, Aerospace Programs Northland Community and Technical College 13892 Airport Drive Thief River Falls, MN 56701

Dear Mr. Zoller:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition for an amendment . It explains

the basis for our decision , describes its effect, and lists the revised conditions and limitations.

By letter dated May 25, 2015 , you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on

behalf of Northland Community and Technical College (hereinafter petitioner or operator) for

an e xemption

. In the October 16 , 2015 decision letter, the FAA granted Exemption No.

13206 . That exemption from §§ 61.23(a) and (c), 61.101(e)(4) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows the petitioner to operate a UAS to perform aerial data collection

. At the time, the FAA was unable to approve

the Vireo UAS

. The FAA is now p repared to act on that request.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition in the Federal Register because the requested amendment to the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this pe tition would be detrimental to the petitioner

. T he

unmanned aircraft authorized in the original grant are comparable in type, size, weight, speed and operating capabilities to those in this petition

.

Airworthiness Certification

In accordance with the statutory criteria provided in Section 333 of Public Law 112

− 95 in

reference to 49 U.S.C. § 44704, and in consideration of the size, weight, speed, and limited operating area associated with the aircraft and its operation, the Secretary of Transportation

h as determined that this aircraft meets the conditions of Section 333. Therefore, the FAA

finds that relief from 14 CFR part 21, C ertification procedures for products and parts,2

Subpart H

— Airworthiness Certificates , and any associated noise certification a nd testing requirements of part 36, is not necessary.

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 13206 remains valid and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority contained

in 49 U.S.C

. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, the operator is granted an amendment to add new aircraft to its UAS operations.

The operator shall add this amendment to its original exemption.

Conditions and Limitations

All conditions and limitations within Grant of Exemption No. 13206 remain in effect except as follows. Condition No. 1 has been updated to reflect the additional aircraft

.

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exempt ion will be grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption.

1. Operations authorized by th is grant of exemption are limited to the Sentera Phoenix ( Vireo UAS ) , DJI Inspire 1, Lockheed Martin Indago , DJI Phantom 3 Professional,

DJI Phantom 3 Advanced, 3D Robotics Iris +, 3D Robotics DIY Quad Copter, 3D Robotics Multirotor ( DIY Hexacopter ), 3D Robotics Solo, Altavian Nova F6500, and

Altavian Nova R8400 when weighing less than 55 pounds including payload. Proposed operations of any ot her aircraft will require a new petition or a petition to amend this exemption.

This exemption terminates on October 31, 2017

, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely

, / s/

John S. Duncan Director, Flight Standards Service