alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). 1 NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T A N TH O N Y A N D RE SH A RP, P e titio n e r- A p p e llan t, v. J OS E P H A . B I C K, R es po nd ent- A pp el l ee . N o. 08- 16648 D. C. No . 2 : 0 8 - CV- 0 0 4 4 3 - GEB ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia G a r l a nd E . B urr e l l , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d A ugus t10, 2010 ** B efo re: L E A V Y , H A W K IN S , an dIK U T A , C i rcu i tJu d g es. A nthonyA ndr e S ha rp appe a l s pr o s e the di s m i s s a l of hi s pe t i t i on f

or r e m ova l of

aC a l i f orni as t a t e c ourta c t i on t o f e de r a l c ourt . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on



# FI LED SEP 01 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSF o rth e r e a s o n s s ta te din th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s Ju ly1 5 , 2 0 0 8 , o r d e r , a 1 ce rt i fi ca t e of app ea l abi l i ty i s unn ec es saryi n thi s c as e. 2 u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 , a n dw e a f f i rm. 1 S harp cont ends the di stri ctcourterre d b y denyi ng hi s pet i t i on for r em ov al b e c au s e th e s ta te c o u rt an ds ta te o f f ic ia ls a r e v io la tin g h is c o n s titu tio n a l r ig h ts . W e a f f irm th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s c o n c lu s io n th a t, a s th e p la in tif f in th e u n d e r ly in g s ta te c o u rt a c tio n , S h a rp c a n n o t r e m o v e th e c a s e to f e d e r a l c o u rt. See 2 8 U . S. C. § 1 4 4 6 ( a ) ; s e e al

s o A m e r i c an I

nt ’ l U nde rw r i te rs , (

P hi l i ppi nes ) , I nc . v . C ont i ne ntal I ns . C o. , 84 3 F . 2d 12 53 , 12 60 (9th C i r. 19 88 ) ( “ T he ri gh tt o rem ov e ast at e c ou rt ca se t o federa l courti s c l earl y l i m i t ed t o d ef endant s. ”) . A l l pe ndi ng m ot i ons a r e de ni e d. AF F I RME D.
§ 20.26 Electronic availability and indexes of certain records. ( a ) Indexes shall be maintained, and revised at least quarterly, and, as required, copies of electronic records shall be made available for the following Food and Drug Administration records: ( 1 ) Final orders published in the FEDERAL REGISTER with respect to every denial or withdrawal of approval of a new drug application or a new animal drug application for which a public hearing has been requested.
( 2 ) Statements of policy and interpretation adopted by the agency and still in force and not published in the Federal Register.
( 3 ) Administrative staff manuals and instructions to staff that affect a member of the public.
( 4 ) Records that have been released to any person in response to a Freedom of Information request, and that: ( i ) The Agency has determined have become, or are likely to become, the subject of subsequent Freedom of Information requests for substantially the same records; or
( ii ) Have been requested three or more times under the Freedom of Information Act.
( b ) Each such record and index will be made available by accessing the Agency's website at *https://www.fda.gov .* A printed copy of each index is available by writing or visiting the Freedom of Information Staff's address on the Agency's website at *https://www.fda.gov .*
[42 FR 15616, Mar. 22, 1977, as amended at 46 FR 8456, Jan. 27, 1981; 68 FR 25285, May 12, 2003; 76 FR 31469, June 1, 2011; 79 FR 68114, Nov. 14, 2014; 87 FR 55911, Sept. 13, 2022]
§ 20.109 Data and information obtained by contract. ( a ) All data and information obtained by the Food and Drug Administration by contract, including all progress reports pursuant to a contract, are available for public disclosure when accepted by the responsible agency official except to the extent that they remain subject to an exemption established in subpart D of this part, e.g., they relate to law enforcement matters as provided in § 20.88(b).
( b ) Upon the awarding of a contract by the Food and Drug Administration, the technical proposal submitted by the successful offeror will be available for public disclosure. All cost proposals and the technical proposals of unsuccessful offerors submitted in response to a request for proposals are exempt from disclosure as confidential commercial or financial information pursuant to § 20.61.
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 18, 2024.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-24-00206-CV

LITA DEVELOPMENT LLC, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 2

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1137837

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is from a judgment signed November 21, 2023. The notice of 

appeal was filed March 5, 2024 following the filing of a timely motion for new trial, 

and appellant was granted an extension of time to file the notice of appeal. To date, 

our records show that appellant has not paid the appellate filing fee. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless party is excused by statute 

or by appellate rules from paying costs). Tex. Gov’t Code § 51.207 (appellate fees 
2

and costs).

On April 2, 2024, appellant was instructed to pay the appellate filing fee on 

or before April 12, 2024 or the appeal would be subject to dismissal without further 

notice. Appellant did not provide any response to the notice.

On May 14, 2024, appellant was ordered to pay the filing fee on or before 

May 24, 2024. In the order, the court notified appellant that failure to comply with 

this requirement would leave the appeal subject to dismissal without further notice 

for want of prosecution.

Appellant has not paid the appellate filing fee, nor has it otherwise responded 

to the court’s order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c) 

(allowing involuntary dismissal of case because appellant has failed to comply with 

notice from clerk requiring response or other action within specified time).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Bourliot, and Wilson.
§ 507.28 Holding and distribution of human food by-products for use as animal food. ( a ) Human food by-products held for distribution as animal food must be held under conditions that will protect against contamination, including the following: ( 1 ) Containers and equipment used to convey or hold human food by-products for use as animal food before distribution must be designed, constructed of appropriate material, cleaned as necessary, and maintained to protect against the contamination of human food by-products for use as animal food;
( 2 ) Human food by-products for use as animal food held for distribution must be held in a way to protect against contamination from sources such as trash; and
( 3 ) During holding, human food by-products for use as animal food must be accurately identified.
( b ) Labeling that identifies the product by the common or usual name must be affixed to or accompany the human food by-products for use as animal food when distributed.
( c ) Shipping containers (*e.g.,* totes, drums, and tubs) and bulk vehicles used to distribute human food by-products for use as animal food must be examined prior to use to protect against the contamination of animal food from the container or vehicle when the facility is responsible for transporting the human food by-products for use as animal food itself or arranges with a third party to transport the human food by-products for use as animal food.
Docket No. FAA-2013-0093

Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?
Exhibit
23.1
 
 **CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
 
 
 To the
Board of Directors
 Level 8
Systems, Inc.
 
 We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
our report dated February 25, 2005, (which report expresses an unqualified
opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the Company's ability
to continue as a going concern) of Level 8 Systems, Inc. and Subsidiaries for
the year ended December 31, 2004.
 
 
 
 /s/ Margolis &
Company P.C.
 Certified Public
Accountants
 
 
 
 Bala
Cynwyd, PA
 March 11,
2005
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 40110 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
MISAEL BUSTOS

- GUTIERREZ , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:13

- CR

- 674

- 1

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Misael Bustos

Gutierrez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Bustos

- Gutierrez h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opi nion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 4, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-40110 Document: 00512825272 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/04/2014No. 14

- 40110

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leav e to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 14-40110 Document: 00512825272 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/04/2014
#### § 1314.01 Scope.

This part specifies the requirements for retail sales of scheduled listed chemical products to individuals for personal use.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Regulatory Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

Wednesday, March 3, 2010 at 11 a.m.

# PLACE:

Commission hearing room, 901 New York Avenue, NW., Suite 200, Washington, DC 20268-0001.

# STATUS:

The portion of the meeting dealing with agenda items 1 through 6 will be open to the public. The remainder of the meeting (agenda items 7 through 9) will be closed to the public. The public session will be podcast.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. Report on international activities (open).

2. Commission participation in Congressional staff briefings (open).

3. Status of Annual Compliance Review (open).

4. Status of other active cases (open).

5. Update on recent activities of Joint Periodicals Task Force and status of anticipated report to the Congress pursuant to section 708 of the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act of 2006 (open).

6. Discussion of Postal Service's March 2, 2010 presentation on its future business model (open).

                        7. Discussion of pending litigation                         *(USPS v. PRC)*                         (closed).                    

8. Personnel matters—compensation and senior staff goals (closed).

9. Discussion of confidential commercial information relative to Commission contracts (closed).

# CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:

                        Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel, Postal Regulatory Commission, at 202-789-6820 or                         *stephen.sharfman@prc.gov*                         (for questions concerning the agenda) and Shoshana M. Grove at 202-789-6842 or                         *shoshana.grove@prc.gov*                         (for questions concerning podcasting).                    

*Dated:*                         February 19, 2010.                    

Shoshana M. Grove,

*Secretary*.                    

[FR Doc. 2010-3809 Filed 2-22-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-FW-S
From: Meehan, Clair Subject: Water Quality Standards Regulatory Clarifications Proposed Rule - October 29 meeting follow-up

Date: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 2:29:00 PM

Attachments: WQS Webinar 2013 10 23_Final Clean Public Meeting.pdf



## Thank you for your interest in EPA’s October 29 public meeting on the Water Quality Standards Regulatory Clarifications Proposed Rule. Attached, please find a copy of the

slides shared.

**HOW TO SUBMIT COMMENTS ON THE RULEMAKING** Written comments must be received by the last day of the comment period, **December 3, 2013** 

.

If you wish to submit a comment on the proposed rule, your comment must be directed to the associated docket (Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-2010-0606) by one of the following methods:

· Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov . Follow the online instructions for submitting comments.

· Email: ow-docket@epa.gov

.

· Mail: Water Docket, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 2822T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460. Attention: Docket ID No. EPA– HQ–OW–2010–0606.

· Hand Delivery: EPA Docket Center, EPA West Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20004, Attention: Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OW–2010– 0606. Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket Center’s normal hours of operation. Special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information by calling 202–566–2426.

**FOR MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THE RULEMAKING** More information about the proposed rulemaking is available on EPA’s website at: http://water.epa.gov/lawsregs/lawsguidance/wqs_index.cfm

.

For more information about submitting your public comments, please refer to the notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register ( http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-04/pdf/2013-21140.pdf ).

**QUESTIONS?** For more information about the public meeting or webinars, please contact: Ms. Janita Aguirre, US EPA, at 202.566.1149 or aguirre.janita@epa.gov

. If you have additional clarifying questions about the proposed rule, please contact US EPA at the phone and email address dedicated to this rulemaking: 202-566-1860 or WQSRegulatoryClarifications@epa.gov.

### Clair Meehan | Environmental Scientist
clair.meehan@tetratech.com

Tetra Tech | Complex World, Clear Solutions
www.tetratech.com

PLEASE NOTE: This message, including any attachments, may include privileged, confidential and/or inside information. Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by replying to this message and then delete it from

your system. 

# P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
### Reconnaissance of the geology and ground water of the Khorat Plateau, Thailand

By: Philip E. LaMoreaux

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1429

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STEPHEN M. CANAS,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

RAYTHEON TECHNICAL SERVICES

COMPANY, LLC, a subsidiary of

Raytheon Company,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 10-56897

D.C. No. 5:10-cv-01432-R-E

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Manuel L. Real, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 9, 2012** 

Before: RAWLINSON, MURGUIA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges. 

Stephen M. Canas appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing

his employment action against Raytheon Technical Services Company, LLC. We

FILED

OCT 16 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-56897

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Harrell v. 20th

Century Ins. Co., 934 F.2d 203, 206 (9th Cir. 1991). We vacate and remand.

Although the district court properly dismissed his claims, Canas was

proceeding pro se, and the district court abused its discretion by dismissing Canas’

action with prejudice and without an opportunity to amend. See Flowers v. First

Hawaiian Bank, 295 F.3d 966, 976 (9th Cir. 2002) (noting standard of review and

that this court is “very cautious in approving a district court’s decision to deny pro

se litigants leave to amend”); Lucas v. Dep’t of Corr., 66 F.3d 245, 248 (9th Cir.

1995) (per curiam) (“Unless it is absolutely clear that no amendment can cure the

defect, . . . a pro se litigant is entitled to notice of the complaint’s deficiencies and

an opportunity to amend prior to dismissal of the action.”). 

Accordingly, we vacate and remand to allow Canas an opportunity to file an

amended complaint.

Raytheon’s objection to and motion to strike Canas’ requests to supplement

the record on appeal are granted.

Each party shall bear its own costs on appeal.

VACATED and REMANDED.
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Southwall Technologies Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 29, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert R. Freeman, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|/s/ROBERT R. FREEMANRobert R. Freeman
Chief Financial Officer
November 12, 2002 |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---

QuickLinks
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00166

- CR

Anson Dujuan Grissom

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 396th District Court

o f Tarrant County (1300504D )

April 30, 2015

Opinion by Justice Walker

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SEC OND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_ /s/ Sue Walker

__________________ Justice Sue Walker
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN FORM 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       3,589,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,862,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (132,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  3,017,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,425,000
<PP&E>                                       2,587,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,473,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,915,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,600,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    12,139,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (5,824,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,915,000
<SALES>                                      6,568,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,568,000
<CGS>                                        3,108,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,006,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (35,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,489,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,489,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,489,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .18
        

</TABLE>