alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6529

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. ROBERT FERDINAND ANNEHEIM, a/k/a Bobby, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (5:99-cr-00020-RLV-2)

Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: August 26, 2009

Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Ferdinand Anneheim, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Jack Higdon, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.PER CURIAM: Robert Anneheim seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006). In criminal cases, the defendant must file the notice of appeal with in ten days after the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A); see United States v.

Alvarez , 210 F.3d 309, 310 (5th Cir. 2000) (holding that § 3582 proceeding is criminal in nature and ten-day appeal period applies). With or without a motion, upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause, the district court may grant an extension of up to thirty days to file a notice of appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes , 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 1985). The district court entered its order denying the motion for reduction of sentence on March 4, 2009. Anneheim filed the notice of appeal on March 21, at the earliest, * after the ten-day period expired but within the thirty-day excusable neglect period. Because the notice of appeal was filed within the excusable neglect period, we remand the case to the district court for the court to determine whether Anneheim has shown

* For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266 (1988).

23 excusable neglect or good cause warranting an extension of the ten-day appeal period. The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further consideration.

REMANDED
§ 520.2362 Thenium closylate. ( a ) *Specifications.* Each tablet contains thenium closylate equivalent to 500 milligrams thenium base. ( a ) *Specifications.* Thenium closylate tablets contain thenium closylate equivalent to 500 milligrams thenium as base in each tablet. ( b ) *Sponsor.* See No. 000061 in § 510.600(c) of this chapter. ( c ) *Conditions of use in dogs* — ( 1 ) *Amount.* Dogs weighing over 10 pounds: Administer 1 tablet as a single dose. Dogs weighing 5 to 10 pounds: Administered one-half tablet twice during a single day. Repeat treatment after 2 or 3 weeks. ( 2 ) *Indications for use.* For treatment of canine ancylostomiasis by the removal from the intestines of the adult forms of the species *Ancylostoma caninum* and *Uncinaria stenocephala* (hookworms). ( 3 ) *Limitations.* Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian. [40 FR 13838, Mar. 27, 1975, as amended at 41 FR 53477, Dec. 7, 1976; 46 FR 48642, Oct. 2, 1981; 61 FR 8873, Mar. 6, 1996; 62 FR 61625, Nov. 19, 1997; 79 FR 28832, May 20, 2014]
<PAGE>


                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.25.2

                             SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE

                       REVOLVING LINE OF CREDIT AGREEMENT

This SECOND AMENDMENT ("Amendment") is dated as of January __, 2003, by and
between WFS RECEIVABLES CORPORTION 3, a California corporation (the "Borrower"),
and WESTERN FINANCIAL BANK a federal savings bank (the "Bank"), and amends the
REVOLVING LINE OF CREDIT AGREEMENT, as amended, ("Agreement") entered into by
the parties on August 8, 2002 with reference to the following:

                                    RECITALS

A. The Agreement is being amended as follows:

                                    AGREEMENT

      In consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein, and in reliance
upon the recitals set forth above, the parties agree as follows:

      1.    CERTAIN DEFINITIONS

            The definition of "COMMITMENT AMOUNT" shall mean $150,000,000.

      2.    Except as specifically amended herein, all terms of the Agreement
            shall remain in full force and effect.

      3.    Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meanings set
            forth in the Agreement.

Wherefore, the undersigned have executed this Amendment on the date set forth
below to be effective as of the date first set forth above.

WFS RECEIVABLES CORPORATION 3               WESTERN FINANCIAL BANK


-----------------------------------         ---------------------------------
John Coluccio, President                    Lee A. Whatcott,
                                            Senior Executive Vice President,
                                            Chief Financial Officer and
                                            Chief Operating Officer
1 ... T h e H on or a bl e B r e n da Cha pm a n pr e s i de d ov e r t h e mot i on t o s e t as i de t h e i n f or ma t i on . T h e Hon or a bl e Al A lo n so sign e d the ju d g m e n t. i i i i i i



### CON CU RRING OP INION No
. 04 -0 8- 00 54 7- CR Anthony J osephHERRERA , Appellant
v . T h e STA TE of

Te xas, Appellee Fr om the County

Court at L aw No.1, Be x ar County , Texas Trial Court No. 232454 Honora ble Al Alonso, J udg e Presiding 1 Opinion by : Kar en Ang elini, J ustice Concurringopinion by : Sandee B ryan Marion, J ustice Sitt ing: Kar en Ang elini, J ustice

Sandee B ryan Marion, J ustice Phylis J . Speedlin, J ustice Deliver ed and F iled: J uly 29, 2009 Iconcur in the majo ri t y ’s judgme nt; however , for the r easons se t forth in my concur ring opinion in Ur

dia le s v . S tate , N o. 04 -0 8- 00 54 6- CR, 20 09 WL18 83 93 2 ( Te x. Ap p. —Sa n Anto nio J uly 1, no pet. h.), I

urg e the L eg islature to amend its def inition of “ ra ce” beca

use the “ statutoryCon c u r r i n g Opi n i on 04
- 08
- 00 54 7- CR

- 2- definition place s an ordinar y law-a biding pe rson into the position of committ ing an o ff en se, eve n if h e is o th e r

w is e o b s e r

v in gth e s p e e d

li mi t, s im

p ly b y u s in gh is v e h ic le to p a s s an o th e r v e h icle.” Id. at *5. Sandee B ryan Marion, J ustice DO NO T PU B L I SH
§ 520.1451 Moxidectin tablets. ( a ) *Specifications.* Each tablet contains 30, 68, or 136 micrograms of moxidectin.
( b ) *Sponsor.* See No. 054771 in § 510.600(c) of this chapter.
( c ) *Conditions of use* — ( 1 ) *Amount.* 3 micrograms per kilogram (1.36 micrograms per pound) of body weight.
( 2 ) *Indications for use.* To prevent infection by the canine heartworm *Dirofilaria immitis* and the subsequent development of canine heartworm disease.
( 3 ) *Limitations.* Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian.
[62 FR 37713, July 15, 1997, as amended at 78 FR 28825, May 20, 2014]
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                                  SUBSIDIARIES



Visio International Limited  (formerly Shapeware International Limited)
Dublin, Ireland

Visio International (UK) Limited  (formerly Shapeware (UK) Limited)
London, England

Visio France SARL  (formerly Shapeware France SARL)
Paris, France

Visio GmbH  (formerly Shapeware GmbH)
Munich, Germany

Visio International Incorporated
Seattle, Washington U.S.A.
     Doing business as:
     Visio International Incorporated (Asia/Pacific)
     Visio International Incorporated (Australia /New Zealand)
     Visio International Incorporated (Latin America)

Visio Singapore PTE LTD
Singapore

Visio Japan K.K.
Tokyo, Japan
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 240 (Monday, December 15, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 74155]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29312]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8970]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Piero di Cosimo: The Poetry of Painting in 
Renaissance Florence''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the 
Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, 
et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 
of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 
2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 
2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the 
exhibition ``Piero di Cosimo: The Poetry of Painting in Renaissance 
Florence,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported 
pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I 
also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at 
the National Gallery of Art, Washington, DC, from on or about February 
1, 2015, until on or about May 3, 2015, and at possible additional 
exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national 
interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be 
published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the imported objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202-632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of 
State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: December 4, 2014.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-29312 Filed 12-12-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 39946

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

DEBBY RAE JOHNSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2013 Unpublished Opinion No. 563

Filed: July 2, 2013

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED 

OPINION AND SHALL NOT 

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Third Judicial District, State of Idaho, Gem

County. Hon. Juneal C. Kerrick, District Judge. 

Order denying I.C.R. 35 motion for reduction of sentence, affirmed.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Sarah E. Tompkins, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

GUITIERREZ, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge;

and GRATTON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Debby Rae Johnson was convicted of one count of possession or delivery of a controlled 

substance while in jail, Idaho Code § 18-2511. The district court withheld judgment and placed 

Johnson on probation for three years. Subsequently, Johnson admitted to violating her probation 

and the district court revoked probation and executed a five-year sentence with two and one-half 

years determinate. Johnson filed an Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motion, which the district court 

denied. Johnson appeals from the denial of her Rule 35 motion.

A Rule 35 motion is a request for leniency which is addressed to the sound discretion of 

the sentencing court. State v. Knighton, 143 Idaho 318, 319, 144 P.3d 23, 24 (2006); State v. 

Allbee, 115 Idaho 845, 846, 771 P.2d 66, 67 (Ct. App. 1989). In presenting a Rule 35 motion, 
2

the defendant must show that the sentence is excessive in light of new or additional information 

subsequently provided to the district court in support of the motion. State v. Huffman, 144 Idaho 

201, 159 P.3d 838 (2007). Our focus on review is upon the nature of the offense and the 

character of the offender. State v. Reinke, 103 Idaho 771, 772, 653 P.2d 1183, 1184 (Ct. App. 

1982). Where a sentence is not illegal, the appellant must show that it is unreasonably harsh in 

light of the primary objective of protecting society and the related goals of deterrence, 

rehabilitation and retribution. State v. Broadhead, 120 Idaho 141, 145, 814 P.2d 401, 405 

(1991), overruled on other grounds by State v. Brown, 121 Idaho 385, 825 P.2d 482 (1992); 

State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). 

Having reviewed the record, including any new information submitted with Johnson’s 

Rule 35 motion, we find no abuse of discretion in the district court’s denial of the motion. 

Accordingly, the district court’s order denying Johnson’s I.C.R. 35 motion is affirmed.
[No. 16221-4-III.

Division Three.

December 2, 1997.]

#### F. Daniel Frost, *Trustee, Respondent,*v. Tree Top, Inc., *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Benton County, No. 96-2-00435-6, Dennis D. Yule, J., entered October 24, 1996. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Kato, J., concurred in by Kurtz and Brown, JJ.
Appliances

•	 Always plug major appliances, like refrigerators, stoves, washers

and dryers, directly into a wall outlet.

•	 Never use an extension cord with a major appliance — it can

easily overheat and start a fire.

•	 Always plug small appliances directly into a wall outlet.

•	 Unplug small appliances when you are not using them.

•	 Keep lamps, light fixtures and light bulbs away from anything that

can burn.

•	 Use light bulbs that match the recommended wattage on the

lamp or fixture.

•	 Check electrical cords on appliances often. Replace cracked,

damaged and loose electrical cords. Do not try to repair them.

Outlets

•	 Do not overload wall outlets.

•	 Insert plugs fully into sockets.

•	 Never force a three-prong cord into a two-slot outlet.

•	 Install tamper-resistant electrical outlets if you have young

children.

Extension Cords, Power Strips and Surge Protectors

•	 Replace worn, old or damaged extension cords right away.

•	 Use extension cords for temporary purposes only.

•	 Avoid putting cords where they can be damaged or pinched, like

under a carpet or rug.

•	 Do not overload power strips.

•	 Use power strips that have internal overload protection.

Electrical Fire Safety

Follow these electrical safety tips to help keep

your home fire-safe.

Make sure all electrical work in your home is done by a qualified electrician!

For more information and free resources, visit www.usfa.fema.gov/prevention/outreach

FA-343 / May 2015
Space Heater

•	 Keep anything that can burn, such as bedding, clothing and curtains, at least 3

feet away from the heater.

•	 Make sure the heater has an automatic shut-off, so if it tips over, it shuts off.

•	 Turn heaters off when you go to bed or leave the room.

•	 Plug portable heaters directly into outlets and never into an extension cord or

power strip.

•	 Only use portable heaters from a recognized testing laboratory.

Fireplace

•	 Keep a glass or metal screen in front of the fireplace to prevent embers or

sparks jumping out.

•	 Do not burn paper in your fireplace.

•	 Put the fire out before you go to sleep or leave your home.

•	 Put ashes in a metal container with a lid, outside, at least 3 feet from your

home.

Wood Stove

•	 Make sure your wood stove is 3 feet from anything that can burn.

•	 Do not burn paper in your wood stove.

•	 Put the fire out before you go to sleep or leave your home.

•	 Have your chimney inspected and cleaned each year by a professional.

Heating Fire Safety

Follow these heating tips to help maintain a

fire-safe home this winter.

For more information and free resources, visit

www.usfa.fema.gov/prevention/outreach

Furnace

•	 Have your furnace

inspected each year.

•	 Keep anything that can

burn away from the

furnace.

Kerosene Heater

•	 Only use kerosene heaters

from a recognized testing

laboratory.

•	 Make sure the heater has an

automatic shut-off, so if it tips

over, it shuts off.

•	 Refuel your cooled heater

outside.
[No. 39339-1-I.

Division One.

December 22, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Lori Barry Michaels, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for What-com County, No. 95-1-00794-8, James Murphy, J. Pro Tern., entered September 6, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
§ 207.25 What information is required for registration? Registrants must provide the following information: ( a ) Name of the owner or operator of each establishment; if a partnership, the name of each partner; if a corporation, the name of each corporate officer and director, and the place of incorporation;
( b ) Each establishment's name, physical address, and telephone number(s);
( c ) All name(s) of the establishment, including names under which the establishment conducts business or names by which the establishment is known;
( d ) Registration number of each establishment, if previously assigned by FDA;
( e ) A Unique Facility Identifier in accordance with the system specified under section 510 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
( f ) All types of operations performed at each establishment;
( g ) Name, mailing address, telephone number, and email address of the official contact for the establishment, as provided in § 207.69(a); and
( h ) Additionally, with respect to foreign establishments subject to registration, the name, mailing address, telephone number, and email address must be provided for: ( 1 ) The United States agent, as provided in § 207.69(b);
( 2 ) Each importer in the United States of drugs manufactured, repacked, relabeled, or salvaged at the establishment that is known to the establishment; and
( 3 ) Each person who imports or offers for import such drug to the United States.
§ 515.21 Refusal to approve a medicated feed mill license application. ( a ) The Commissioner of Food and Drugs (the Commissioner) shall within 90 days, or such additional period as may be agreed upon by the Commissioner and the applicant, after the filing of an application under § 515.10, inform the applicant in writing of his/her intention to issue a notice of opportunity for a hearing on a proposal to refuse to approve the application, if the Commissioner determines upon the basis of the application, on the basis of a preapproval inspection, or upon the basis of any other information before him that: ( 1 ) The application is incomplete, false, or misleading in any particular; or
( 2 ) The methods used in and the facilities and controls used for the manufacturing, processing, and packaging of such animal feed are not adequate to preserve the identity, strength, quality, and purity of the new animal drug therein; or
( 3 ) The facility manufactures animal feeds bearing or containing new animal drugs in a manner that does not accord with the specifications for manufacture or labels animal feeds bearing or containing new animal drugs in a manner that does not accord with the conditions or indications of use that are published under section 512(i) or 572(e)(2) of the act.
( b ) The Commissioner, as provided in § 515.30, shall expeditiously notify the applicant of an opportunity for a hearing on the question of whether such application is approvable, unless by the 30th day following the date of issuance of the letter informing the applicant of the intention to issue a notice of opportunity for a hearing the applicant: ( 1 ) Withdraws the application; or
( 2 ) Waives the opportunity for a hearing; or
( 3 ) Agrees with the Commissioner on an additional period to precede issuance of such notice of hearing.
[64 FR 63204, Nov. 19, 1999, as amended at 72 FR 69121, Dec. 6, 2007]
II 

Calendar No. 540 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7385 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 23, 2024 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2024 

Reported by Mr. PETERS, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 29 Franklin Street in Petersburg, Virginia, 

as the ‘‘John Mercer Langston Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. JOHN MERCER LANGSTON POST OFFICE 

4 BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 29 Franklin Street in Peters7 burg, Virginia, shall be known and designated as the 

8 ‘‘John Mercer Langston Post Office Building’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7385 RS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘John Mercer 

5 Langston Post Office Building’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 540 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7385 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostLangston Post Office Building’’. tersburg, Virginia, as the ‘‘John Mercer al Service located at 29 Franklin Street in PeSEPTEMBER 25, 2024 

Reported without amendment 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
#### § 516.12 Purpose.

This subpart establishes standards and procedures for determining eligibility for designation and the associated incentives and benefits described in section 573 of the act, including a 7-year period of exclusive marketing rights.
OSLDPS INFORMATION BULLETIN

No. 00-004 February 28, 2000

TO: All State Agency Heads

All State Agency Points of Contact

FROM: C. H. “Butch” Straub II

Director

SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 1999 Equipment Grant Application Electronic Submissions

Using the Worldwide Web

To reduce paperwork and improve efficiency, the Office of Justice Programs (OJP) has adopted

an on-line grant application process for all OJP program offices which includes the Office for

State and Local Domestic Preparedness Support (OSLDPS). 

States participating in the OJP State and Local Domestic Preparedness Equipment Program will

be asked to submit their state applications through the OJP Grants Management System (GMS). 

User ID’s and passwords state points of contact use to access GMS must be verified by OSLDPS

before on-line applications can be submitted. To speed the process, please contact your OSLDPS

program manager to review on-line submission procedures, and to discuss related programmatic

issues. 

Under this system, state agency grant applications will be automatically linked to the needs

assessment data and state strategies (both are required submissions for the FY 1999 grant

program). This however will not occur until states are prepared to begin inputting this

information later this spring or early summer. In the meantime states should submit on-line grant

applications now to receive FY 1999 funding. As you know, planning funds are included with

state allocations for FY 1999 funding. The Preliminary Budget Submission sheet found in

Appendix A of the OSLDPS application kit for this program will be used to submit your initial

budget. Instructions to attach the budget submission, narrative, and other text or word files to

electronic applications are provided on-line in GMS. States are strongly encouraged to apply for

planning funds as soon as possible which when awarded will allow states to begin to plan for the

needs assessment and submission of related data, and the submission of statewide strategies. 

OSLDPS will provide state agencies with additional information regarding on-line submissions of

the needs assessment data and statewide strategies in the coming weeks. 

To access the OJP webpage to submit state agency FY 1999 grant applications, please go to

www.ojp.usdoj.gov/fundopps.htm. Helpline assistance is available by dialing 1-888-549-9901.
Further, please feel free to contact OSLDPS at 202-305-9887 with any questions.