alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
38820.

#### J. M. WELLS SUPPLY COMPANY v. SHIELS.

Decided June 1, 1961

Rehearing denied June 12, 1961.

*823*Copland & Copland, Dan Copland, Thomas E. Sikes,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. Gordon Young, J. M. Flournoy,*contra.

Felton, Chief Judge.

The mere allegation that the owner “employed” the contractor to make improvements on the owner’s property does not meet the requirement of the law for the reason that such an allegation does not necessarily mean that the contract contemplated that the contractor was to supply the materials for the improvement. Such an allegation could mean that the contractor was to furnish only labor and skill. *Lumber Fabricators, Inc. v. Gregory,*213 Ga. 356 (99 S. E. 2d 145), while it is an equity case, is an unequivocal ruling that the allegation going no further than alleging employment is insufficient as against a general demurrer. Since the contract under which the contractor is to *furnish*materials is the principal basis upon which a materialman’s lien on the owner’s property is based, the failure to allege such a contract in a lien foreclosure against the owner is fatal. Whether or not a foreclosure action would be bad as against a general demurrer for a mere failure to allege that the amount sought to be established is within the contract in whole or in part is not decided. Here, both deficiencies appear. Failure to allege that no personal security was taken by or to secure the debt was not a defect subject to demurrer. It has been held that while it may be that mechanics who have taken personal security thereby waive their right to a lien (under *Code*§ 67-2001), materialmen have a lien as well when they take personal security as when they do not. *Ford v. Wilson & Co.,*85 Ga. 109 (3), 115 (11 S. E. 559). Contractors, materialmen, machinists and manufacturers of machinery do not by the taking of personal security waive the lien given them under *Code*§ 94-1104. *Chicago Bldg. &c. Co. v. Talbotton Creamery &c. Co.,*106 Ga. 84 (3) (31 S. E. 809). Since the one ground of general demurrer was properly sustained, *824a contrary ruling on the other two grounds would not save the petition.

The trial court did not err in sustaining the owner’s general demurrer to the materialman’s petition to foreclose its lien.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bell, and Hall, JJ., concur.*
Exhibit 10.1







Agreement to Terminate, Null, and Void the Joint Venture Agreement







Due to mutual irreconcilable differences with regard to the direction of business operation, both parties to the Joint Venture Agreement signed on May 16, 2016 and the subsequent supplemental agreements, hereby agree to terminate, null, and void the Joint Venture Agreement.







The 22,500,000 shares of common stock in Oro East Mining that had been transferred as capital investment to Magnique, Inc. will be restored to Oro East Mining and likewise, the 300,000 common shares or 30% equitable interest in Magnique, Inc. transferred to Oro East will be restored to Magnique, Inc.







Oro East Mining will not be a shareholder of Magnique, Inc. Hang Zhou Ci Xiao Tang will be the sole shareholder of Magnique, Inc.







A mutual general release agreement shall be made and executed upon execution of this agreement.







AGREED AND ACCEPTED:







Dated 05/02/2017








	
/s/ ZHONGPING LOU

	
/s/ TIAN QING CHEN


	
___________________

	
___________________


	
ZHONGPING LOU

	
TIAN Q. CHEN


	
President of

	
Chief Executive Officer of


	
Hang Zhou Ci Xiao Tang Co.

	
Oro East Mining, Inc.
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Amerityre Corporation (the "Company") for the year ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anders A. Suarez, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/Anders A. Suarez
Anders A. Suarez
Chief Financial Officer
September 12, 2006
§ 507.38 Recall plan. ( a ) For animal food with a hazard requiring a preventive control you must: ( 1 ) Establish a written recall plan for the animal food; and
( 2 ) Assign responsibility for performing all procedures in the recall plan.
( b ) The written recall plan must include procedures that describe the steps to perform the following actions as appropriate to the facility: ( 1 ) Directly notify direct consignees about the animal food being recalled, including how to return or dispose of the affected animal food;
( 2 ) Notify the public about any hazard presented by the animal food when appropriate to protect human and animal health;
( 3 ) Conduct effectiveness checks to verify the recall has been carried out; and
( 4 ) Appropriately dispose of recalled animal food, *e.g.,* through reprocessing, reworking, diverting to another use that would not present a safety concern, or destroying the animal food.
01 - 30 - 2013

To; U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Operations, M - 30 West Building ground floor, Room W12 - 140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 To whom it may concern, Paradigm Helicopters LLC is writing this letter to request an extension to Exemption No. 10275 from 14 CFR Part 120, Docket No. FAA - 2011 - 0537 , which is scheduled to expire 06 - 30 - 2013. Justification for this renewal request remains the same as the original request dated May 31, 2011. Your help on this matter is greatly appreciated. Please do not hesitate to contact me if I may be of any assistance. Regards,

Richard R. Jones Chief Pilot, Paradigm Helicopters LLC 11811 N Brantly, Suite 206A Houston, TX 770 34 - 5599 877 - 345 - 8687 rick@paradigmhelicopters.com
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                   Subsidiaries of Astea International Inc.
                   ----------------------------------------

                               December 31, 1999



Company Name                                      Jurisdiction of Organization
------------                                      ----------------------------

Astea FSC                                         Barbados
Astea GmbH                                        Germany
Astea International (AUST) PTY LTD                New South Wales
Astea Israel Ltd.                                 Israel
Astea (UK) Limited                                England
Astea Sarl                                        France
Astea Service and Distribution Systems B.V.       Netherlands
Astea Technology Inc.                             Delaware
Group Technologies, Inc.                          Delaware
Network Data, Inc.                                Delaware
Virtual Service Corporation                       Delaware

                                      55
----

----

| A) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| B) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ Ran Fridrich   |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Ran Fridrich            |   |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |   |
|   |                    |
|   | /s/ Kalia Weintraub     |
|   | Kalia Weintraub         |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

----

----
Exhibit 23.1






CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We have
issued our report dated March 27, 2009, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements included in the Annual Report of Astea International Inc.
and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.  We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the
Registration Statements of Astea International Inc. and Subsidiaries on Forms
S-8 (File No. 333-107757, effective August 8, 2003, File No. 333-61981,
effective August 21, 1998, File No. 333-34865 effective September 3, 1997 and
File No. 333-33825, effective August 18, 1997).





/s/ GRANT
THORNTON LLP


Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania


March
­27, 2009








80
§ 182.8994 Zinc stearate. ( a ) *Product.* Zinc stearate prepared from stearic acid free from chickedema factor.
( b ) *Conditions of use.* This substance is generally recognized as safe when used in accordance with good manufacturing practice.
#### § 3254.30 What policies and procedures must I follow?

The NEA policies and procedures that you must follow are the policies and procedures specified in each applicable section of the OMB guidance in subparts A through I of 2 CFR part 180, as that section is supplemented by the section in this part with the same section number. The contracts that are covered transactions, for example, are specified by section 220 of the OMB guidance (i.e., 2 CFR 180.220) as supplemented by section 220 in this part (i.e., § 3254.220). For any section of OMB guidance in subparts A through I of 2 CFR 180 that has no corresponding section in this part, NEA policies and procedures are those in the OMB guidance.
#### § 343.10 [Reserved]
<PAGE>
 
                                                                     Exhibit 12

               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                       GULF STATES STEEL, INC. OF ALABAMA
                             (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
                                                      (Successor)                    (Predecessor)
                                                      -----------    ----------------------------------------------
                                      Fiscal Year   For the period    For the period
                                         Ended      April 21, 1995      November 1,
                                      October 31,   to October 31,   1994 to April   Fiscal Year Ended October 31,
                                             1996             1995       20, 1995       1994      1993       1992
                                             ----             ----       --------       ----      ----       ----
<S>                                   <C>           <C>              <C>             <C>        <C>        <C>
CALCULATION OF FIXED CHARGES:
   Net interest expense                   $24,118          $12,406      $   5,230    $14,349   $14,998   $ 17,166
   Amortization expense                     1,663              618            415        706       956        673
                                    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Fixed charges                             $25,781          $13,024      $   5,645    $15,055   $15,954   $ 17,839
                                    =============================================================================
 
CALCULATION OF EARNINGS:
   Fixed charges                          $25,781          $13,024      $   5,645    $15,055   $15,954   $ 17,839
   Net income (loss) before tax              (640)           2,155         19,928     33,375    (4,945)   (12,892)
                                    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings                                  $25,141          $15,179      $  25,573    $48,430   $11,009   $  4,947
                                    =============================================================================
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES             (a)            1.2x           4.5x       3.2x        (a)        (a)
                                    =============================================================================
</TABLE>
(a) Earnings are inadequate to cover fixed charges in 1996, 1993 and 1992 by
$640, $4,945 and $12,892, respectively.
<PAGE>   1

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549


   
                                   FORM 8-K/A
    

                                 CURRENT REPORT
                       PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
                       THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



               Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported) -
                                  July 27, 1998


                                  ARISTAR, INC.
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



          DELAWARE                     1-3521                    95-4128205
(State or other jurisdiction of   (Commission File            (I.R.S. Employer
        incorporation)                 Number)               Identification No.)

                8900 GRAND OAK CIRCLE, TAMPA, FLORIDA 33637-1050
                    (Address of principal executive offices)


              Registrant's telephone number, including area code -
                                 (813) 632-4500


<PAGE>   2
             This Amendment No. 1 on Form 8-K/A amends the Registrant's
             Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 29, 1998.

ITEM 7.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND EXHIBITS.

         (c)       Exhibits
   
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
      Exhibit      Description
<S>                 <C>                      

         
         99        Materials used in connection with a telephone conference 
                   with prospective investors on July 27, 1998, as amended.
</TABLE>
    
                                       2

<PAGE>   3

                                    SIGNATURE

         Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                        ARISTAR, INC.



                                        By: /s/ FAY L. CHAPMAN
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Fay L. Chapman
                                            Executive Vice President

   
Date:  September 9, 1998
    
                                       3

<PAGE>   4

                                  EXHIBIT INDEX
   
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
        Exhibit     Description
        -------     -----------
<S>                 <C>                      
         
         99        Materials used in connection with a telephone conference
                   with prospective investors on July 27, 1998, as amended.
</TABLE>
    

                                       4
No. 76-6518.

#### Knighten *v.*Broderick.

Sup. Ct. Miss. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit31.2**

CERTIFICATIONS

I, John Low, certifythat:

1. I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of Spescom Software Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge,this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisquarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in thisquarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

a) all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b) any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting
| Dated:   February 14, 2007 |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|
|                                 |   |
| /s/ John W. Low                      |   |
| John W. Low                          |   |
|                                 |   |
| Chief Financial Officer              |   |

 

 

26

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR   
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1996 
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-1996   
<PERIOD-END>                                    DEC-31-1996  
<CASH>                                           $1,516,072 
<SECURITIES>                                              0    
<RECEIVABLES>                                     5,229,179 
<ALLOWANCES>                                        168,343 
<INVENTORY>                                       5,291,046 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 14,593,586 
<PP&E>                                            1,522,690 
<DEPRECIATION>                                      368,179 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   22,586,460 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            10,662,798 
<BONDS>                                                   0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                           3,785 
<COMMON>                                             68,808 
<OTHER-SE>                                        9,552,579 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     22,586,460 
<SALES>                                          42,139,032 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 42,139,032 
<CGS>                                            35,789,160 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    35,789,160 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  7,310,664 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  782,966 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (1,791,927)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (706,539)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (1,085,388)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0    
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0    
<CHANGES>                                                 0    
<NET-INCOME>                                     (1,085,388)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          (.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (.33)
                                                            
                                               

</TABLE>
Office for Domestic Preparedness 

U.S. Department of Homeland Security 

Washington, DC 20531

ODP Information Bulletin 

No. 156 March 22, 2005

TO: All State Administrative Agency Heads 

 All State Administrative Agency Points of Contact 

 All State Homeland Security Directors 

FROM: Matt A. Mayer 

 Acting Executive Director 

SUBJECT: SLGCP Commercial Equipment Direct Assistance Program (CEDAP) 

The Systems Support Division (SSD) in SLGCP is launching the Commercial Equipment Direct 

Assistance Program (CEDAP) to provide smaller law enforcement and emergency responder agencies 

with equipment items that will enhance and support regional response, mutual aid, and interoperability of 

responder equipment. CEDAP is being offered in two phases in fiscal year (FY) 2005. The first phase 

allows SLGCP to provide applicants with equipment already on Federal contract and is limited to 

personal protective equipment, detection and sensor devices, information sharing software for law 

enforcement operations, and communications interoperability systems. Eligible applicants include 

jurisdictions not currently receiving funding from UASI. Jurisdictions in suburban, rural, and border areas 

are encouraged to apply for equipment that will be used to respond through mutual aid and to protect 

infrastructure in those jurisdictions. “This pilot program will meet the special needs of smaller 

communities to ensure our preparedness efforts reach all of America.” said Matt A. Mayer, Acting 

Executive Director of the Office for State and Local Government Coordination and Preparedness. 

Applications for Phase I will be available for review beginning March 22, and eligible for online receipt 

from April 5 to May 5, 2005 at the SLGCP Responder Knowledge Base (RKB), hosted by the 

Memorial Institute for the Prevention of Terrorism (MIPT) at www.rkb.mipt.org. The CEDAP online 

application is user friendly and easy to complete in one session. Successful applicants will be notified 

this spring by SLGCP. The second phase of the program will begin during the month of May 2005. 

Additional equipment items will be added to the list over the next few months for the planned Phase II, 

May 2005 release date. 

The SAA will receive automatic e-mail notifications of CEDAP applications submitted to SLGCP in 

their states. Notifications will be sent to the SAAs before the applications are rated or ranked by

SLGCP. SAAs who object to an applicant’s request because it is not consistent with the state strategy

will have 7 days to notify SLGCP of these concerns. 

If you have any questions about the CEDAP program, please contact your preparedness officer or the 

SLGCP CSID Helpline at 1-800-368-6498.