alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2019252EN.01003601.xml

| 2.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 252/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 252/36

---

COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2019/1663

of 1 October 2019

amending Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 31 July 2015, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 (1) concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 31 July 2015, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 (1) concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya.

| (2) | On 1 April 2019, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2019/539 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 1 April 2019, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2019/539 (2).

| (3) | In view of the continuing instability and gravity of the situation in Libya, the restrictive measures concerning three persons should be extended for a further period of six months. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

In view of the continuing instability and gravity of the situation in Libya, the restrictive measures concerning three persons should be extended for a further period of six months.

| (4) | Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

In Article 17 of Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333, paragraphs 3 and 4 are replaced by the following:

‘3.   The measures referred to in Article 8(2) shall apply with regard to entries 14, 15 and 16 in Annex II until 2 April 2020.

4.   The measures referred to in Article 9(2) shall apply with regard to entries 19, 20 and 21 in Annex IV until 2 April 2020.’

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 1 October 2019.

For the Council

The President

T. TUPPURAINEN

---

(1)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 of 31 July 2015 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya, and repealing Decision 2011/137/CFSP (OJ L 206, 1.8.2015, p. 34).

1

(2)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/539 of 1 April 2019 amending Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya (OJ L 93, 2.4.2019, p. 15).

2

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, ) ) Plaintiff ) ) ) v. ) CASE NO. 4:09-CV-02453-CW ) ) LISA JACKSON, in her official capacity as ) Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency ) ) Defendant )

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO MODIFY CONSENT DECREE Upon consideration of the Joint Motion to Modify Consent Decree, the Motion is
GRANTED. The Consent Decree entered on February 23, 2010 (Docket Entry 26) is hereby modified
to: (1) extend the deadline in paragraph 7(a) of the Consent Decree from May 10, 2011 to June 21, 2011 for the Administrator to sign a notice or notices approving a State Implementation Plan (“SIP”), promulgating a Federal Implementa tion Plan (“FIP”), or approving a SIP in part with promulgation of a partial FIP for Ida ho, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, and Oregon to meet the requirement of 42 U.S.C. § 7410(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) regarding interfering with measures in other states related to protection of visibility; and (2) require the Administrator to sign by March 15, 2011 a notice proposing either approval of a SIP, promulgation of a FIP or appr oval of a SIP in part with promulgation of a

Case4:09-cv-02453-CW Document31 Filed01/14/11 Page1 of 22 partial FIP for North Dakota to meet the requirement of 42 U.S.C. § 7410(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) regarding interfering with measures in other states related to protection of visibility.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: 1/14/2011

___________________ Claudia Wilken United States District Judge Case4:09-cv-02453-CW Document31 Filed01/14/11 Page2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of

MICHAEL WILLIAM SHOWERS

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT

FROM RETIRED STATUS

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 161 DB 2019 (No. 96 RST 2019)

Attorney Registration No. 62091

(Dauphin County)

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 25th day of November, 2019, the Report and Recommendation of 

Disciplinary Board Member dated November 19, 2019, is approved and it is ORDERED 

that Michael William Showers, who has been on Retired Status, has never been 

suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications, 

competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, 

shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this 

Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing 

of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**714 CA 11-00108**  PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND GREEN, JJ.

IN RE: EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT ASBESTOS LITIGATION.

---------------------------------------------- KEVIN KLAS, AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF ORDER NORMAN WILLIAM KLAS, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND CRANE CO., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

K&L GATES, LLP, NEW YORK CITY (KIRSTEN ALFORD KNEIS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
BELLUCK & FOX, LLP, NEW YORK CITY (JOSEPH W. BELLUCK OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John P. Lane, J.H.O.), entered October 19, 2010. The order denied the motion of defendant Crane Co. for summary judgment. Now, upon the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties on February 16, 2011, and filed in the Erie County Clerk’s Office on March 28, 2011, It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.

Entered: June 10, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court
-78.5 -78.0 -77.5 -77.0 -76.5

38.5 39.0 39.5



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 07/08 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 08 Jul 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.90 N 76.65 WMeters AGL
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

Pursuant to Section 906
    of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,
    chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers
    of Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America, do hereby certify,
    to such officers knowledge, that:

The annual report on Form
    10-K of the TIAA Real Estate Account (the Account) for the year
    ended December 31, 2004 (the Form 10-K) fully complies with the
    requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934 and information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Account.

|Dated:
                   April 15, 2005 |  | /s/ Herbert M. Allison, Jr.                              
|---------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------
|                                         |  |                                                          
|                                         |  | Herbert M. Allison, Jr.                                  
|                                         |  | Chairman of the Board, President
        and Chief       
|                                         |  | Executive Officer, Teachers
        Insurance and Annuity
|                                         |  | Association of America                                   
|                                         |  |                                                          
|Dated:
                   April 15, 2005 |  | /s/ Elizabeth A. Monrad                                  
|                                         |  |                                                          
|                                         |  | Elizabeth A. Monrad                                      
|                                         |  | Executive Vice President                                 
|                                         |  | (Chief Financial Officer), Teachers
        Insurance and
|                                         |  | Annuity Association of America                           

A signed original of this
    written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the TIAA Real
    Estate Account and will be retained by the Account and furnished to the Securities
    and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
<PAGE>

                          ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE

                             RETAILERS NATIONAL BANK

                     DAYTON HUDSON CREDIT CARD MASTER TRUST


         The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Retailers National
Bank, as Servicer ("RNB"), pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated
as of September 13, 1995, as supplemented by the Series 1995-1 Supplement, the
Series 1996-1 Supplement, the Series 1997-1, and the Series 1998-1 Supplement
(as may be amended and supplemented from time to time, the "Agreement"), among
Dayton Hudson Receivables Corporation, as Transferor, RNB as Servicer, and
Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association, as Trustee, does hereby certify
that:

         1.   RNB is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Agreement.
              Capitalized terms used in this Certificate have their respective
              meanings as set forth in the Agreement.

         2.   The undersigned is a Servicing Officer who is duly authorized
              pursuant to the Agreement to execute and deliver this certificate
              to the Trustee.

         3.   A review of the activities of the Servicer during the fiscal year
              ended January 2, 1999, and of its performance under the Agreement
              was conducted under my supervision.

         4.   Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my
              knowledge, performed in all material respects its obligations
              under the Agreement throughout such year and no default in the
              performance of such obligations has occurred or is continuing
              except as set forth in paragraph 5 below.

         5.   The following is a description of each default in the performance
              of the Servicer's obligations under the provisions of the
              Agreement known to me to have been made by the Servicer during the
              fiscal year ended January 2, 1999 which sets forth in detail (i)
              the nature of each default, (ii) the action taken by the Servicer,
              if any, to remedy each such default and (iii) the current status
              of each such default: None.


              IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this
              Certificate as of the 25th day of March, 1999.

                                    RETAILERS NATIONAL BANK,
                                    AS SERVICER,


                                BY: /s/ Thomas A. Swanson
                                    -------------------------------------
                                        Name:  Thomas  A. Swanson
                                        Title:  Vice President & Cashier
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 9421]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4212]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel; Review of Collaborative Minority 
Alcohol Research Development (U54).
    Date: April 6, 2010.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Ranga Srinivas, PhD, Chief, Extramural Project 
Review Branch, Office of Extramural Activities, National Institutes 
of Health, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse & Alcoholism, 5635 
Fishers Lane, Room 2085, Rockville, MD 20852.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants; 93101, ARRA Related Biomedical 
Research and Research Support Awards., National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 23, 2010.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-4212 Filed 3-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### § 516.23 Timing of requests for MUMS-drug designation.

A sponsor may request MUMS-drug designation at any time in the drug development process prior to the submission of an application for either conditional approval or approval of the MUMS drug for which designation is being requested.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of--

BAE Systems, Inc. 

Under Contract No. NOOl 78-04-D-4018 et al. 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

ASBCA No. 59224 

Terry L. Albertson, Esq. 

Stephen J. McBrady, Esq. 

Crowell & Moring LLP 

Washington, DC 

E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq. 

DCMA Chief Trial Attorney 

Douglas R. Jacobson, Esq. 

Trial Attorney 

Defense Contract Management Agency 

Bloomington, MN 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 17 April 2015 

~ Administrative Judge 

Acting Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59224, Appeal of BAE Systems, 

Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
SERVED : APRI L19 , 201 1 

### •::-:'ARTMENTn F U.S
. DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO NNSPOfiTATIO M OFFIC EO FHEARING S
. ^ y' S OPERATlOK' o WASHINGTON , D C If l .'.P H 2 0 A 9 U INTH EMATTE RO F M & RHELICOPTE R FA A DOCKE T NO
. CPlOSOOOl l (Civi l Penalty Action ) FDM S NO
. FAA-2010-12 ] 1
ORDE RO FCfflE FADMINISTRATIV ELA WJUDG E

CORRECTIN GTRANSCRIP T Th e followin g correction s are hereb y mad e i nth e transcrip t o f th e Prehearin g Telephon e Conferenc e hel dMarc h25 , 2011 : PAG ELIN EREAD S SHOUL D REA D
o n produc e b y bein g defens e complain t
ou r allege s
ma* a m concludin g oath
. 3 6 7 1 3 1 5 1 9 1 9 2 1 2 3 2 9 2 9 7

2 0 5 1 4 6 2 5 1 8 1 7 2 1 0 i n

produce d with b e dissen t complainan t you r h e allege s madam includin g oath3 0

3 2 3 3 3 4 3 9 3 9 3 9 4 0 4 2 4 7 4 9 4 9 5 3 5 7 6 1 6 1 6 8 7 0 7 1 7 1 7 2 7 4 7 6 1 8

1 6 3 2 0 5 16,2 1 2 2 2 1 8 10,1 4 1 1 2 0 1 4 1 2 8 2 2 4 9 3 8 1 7 2 0 1 3 Well , deal

Mr
. th e thi s
o f style Everso n mada m madam
o f abou t
a- - operatio n
as k
wa s compute d chronicall y madam Distric t abusiv e reference d
a precedenc e askin g what' s communicat e dat e H Well , we'l l deal Ms
. that th e style d Everso n ma'a m ma'a m abou t
alosin g operatio n aske d compute d chronologicall y ma'a m Federal Distric t abus e o f reference dmanua l t o precedent s askin g yo u what' s conamunicate with dat a M

-2 -8 4 1- 2 8 5 2 8 5 1 3 8 9 2 9 4 9
S O ORDERED
. anythmg
. It' s

precedenc e aime d Oh , nothin g anythin g that' s precedent s ai m No , nothin g further
.

inni e A
. Yode r Chie f Administrativ e Attachment-Servic e Lis t

-3 -FA A Docke t No
. CPlOSOOO l 1 (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federa l Aviatio nAdministratio n 80 0 bidependenc e Avenue , S.W
. Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC^3 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON ECOP Y Michae l Selig , MD , FACC , CFI-H , Respondent' s Representativ e 281 6 Orefiel dRoad Allentown , P A 1810 4 TEL : 610-360-395 3 FAX : Laur aPonto , Complainant' s Counse l Attorney , Enforcemen t

Division/AGC-30 0 Offic e o f th e Chie f Counse l Federal Aviatio nAdministratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W
. Washington , D C 2059 1 TEL : 202-267-986 3 FAX : 202-267-510 6 Th e Honorabl e Ronni e A
. Yoder , Chie f Administrativ e Law Judg e U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Offic e o f Hearings , M-20 , Roo mE12-32 0 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E
. Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-214 2 FAX : 202-366-753 6

^ Servic e wa s b yU.S

. Mail
. Fo rservic e i n perso n o rb yexpedite d courier , us e th e followin g address : Federa l Aviatio n Administration , 60 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu rWrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 , Washington , D

C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-^30

. \ -4 -
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Courtyard By Marriott Limited Partnership Condensed Interim Balance sheet and
Condensed Interim Statement of Operations as of and for the period ended
September 8, 2000, and is qualified in it entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. CURRENCY

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-08-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1.00
<CASH>                                          13,393
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,123
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,234
<PP&E>                                         511,755
<DEPRECIATION>                               (229,856)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 324,880
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,858
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (14,542)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   324,880
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               149,822
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,498
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,397
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,399
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,399
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
§ 300.50 Fixed-combination prescription drugs for humans. The Food and Drug Administration's policy in administering the new-drug, antibiotic, and other regulatory provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act regarding fixed combination dosage form prescription drugs for humans is as follows: ( a ) Two or more drugs may be combined in a single dosage form when each component makes a contribution to the claimed effects and the dosage of each component (amount, frequency, duration) is such that the combination is safe and effective for a significant patient population requiring such concurrent therapy as defined in the labeling for the drug. Special cases of this general rule are where a component is added: ( 1 ) To enhance the safety or effectiveness of the principal active component; and
( 2 ) To minimize the potential for abuse of the principal active component.
( b ) If a combination drug presently the subject of an approved new-drug application has not been recognized as effective by the Commissioner of Food and Drugs based on his evaluation of the appropriate National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council panel report, or if substantial evidence of effectiveness has not otherwise been presented for it, then formulation, labeling, or dosage changes may be proposed and any resulting formulation may meet the appropriate criteria listed in paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) A fixed-combination prescription drug for humans that has been determined to be effective for labeled indications by the Food and Drug Administration, based on evaluation of the NAS-NRC report on the combination, is considered to be in compliance with the requirements of this section.
[40 FR 13496, Mar. 27, 1975, as amended at 64 FR 401, Jan. 5, 1999]
PGI 246.103 Contracting office

responsibilities.

(2)(i) In preparing instructions for Government inspections, the technical activity shall consider, as

applicable—

(A) The past quality history of the contractor;

(B) The criticality of the material procured in relation to its intended use, considering factors such

as—

(1) Reliability;

(2) Safety;

(3) Interchangeability; and

(4) Maintainability;

(C) Problems encountered in the development of the material;

(D) Problems encountered in other procurements of the same or similar material;

(E) Available feedback data from contract administration, receiving, testing, or using activities; and

(F) The experience of other contractors in overcoming manufacturing problems.

(ii) The instructions shall—

(A) Be kept to a minimum;

(B) Ensure that the activities requested are in direct relation to contract quality requirements to

serve as objective evidence of quality conformance; and

(C) Be prepared on a contract-by-contract basis.

(iii) The instructions shall not—

(A) Serve as a substitute for incomplete contract quality requirements;

(B) Impose greater inspection requirements than are in the contract;

(C) Use broad or general designations such as—

(1) All requirements;

(2) All characteristics; or

(3) All characteristics in the classification of defects;

(D) Be used for routine administrative procedures; or
(E) Specify continued inspection requirements when statistically sound sampling will provide an

adequate degree of protection.

(iv) After issuing the instructions, the technical activity must—

(A) Provide the contract administration office with available information regarding those factors that

resulted in the requirement for Government inspection;

(B) Periodically analyze the need to continue, change, or discontinue the instructions; and

(C) Advise the contract administration office of the results of the periodic analyses.

Parent topic: PGI 246.1 -GENERAL