alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          12,929
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                38,400
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     35,595
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          19,068
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            19,885
<LOANS>                                        185,775
<ALLOWANCE>                                      4,018
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 308,594
<DEPOSITS>                                     271,087
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,473
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,523
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,334
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 308,594
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 14,551
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,447
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                17,998
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,933
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   5
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           12,060
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  7,772
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,856
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       5,856
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,670
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .43
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    .881
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,857
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,780
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      100
<RECOVERIES>                                        42
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,620
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,620
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 201

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 201 appear at 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004.

#### § 201.116 Drugs having commonly known directions.

A drug shall be exempt from section 502(f)(1) of the act insofar as adequate directions for common uses thereof are known to the ordinary individual.

[41 FR 6910, Feb. 13, 1976]
#### § 1316.31 Authority for enforcement proceeding.

A hearing may be ordered or granted by any Special Agent in Charge of the Drug Enforcement Administration, at his discretion, to permit any person against whom criminal and/or civil action is contemplated under the Controlled Substances Act (84 Stat. 1242; 21 U.S.C. 801) or the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (84 Stat. 1285; 21 U.S.C. 951) an opportunity to present his views and his proposals for bringing his alleged violations into compliance with the law. Such hearing will also permit him to show cause why prosecution should not be instituted, or to present his views on the contemplated proceeding.

[36 FR 7820, Apr. 24, 1971. Redesignated at 38 FR 26609, Sept. 24, 1973, and amended at 47 FR 41735, Sept. 22, 1982]
##### 



EXHIBIT 3.1
 (Crest)
    
    BritishColumbia
    
    Ministry of Finance
Corporate and Personal
Property Registries
www.corporateonline.gov.bc.ca
    
    Mailing Address:
PO BOX 9431
Stn Prov Govt.
Victoria BC V8W 9V3
    
    Location:
2nd Floor
940 Blanshard St.,
Victoria BC
250-345-8626
 
 Notice of ArticlesBUSINESS CORPORATIONS ACT
    
    CERTIFIED COPY
Of a Document filed with the Province of
British Columbia Registrar of Companies/s/ Ron Townshend
RON TOWNSHEND
June 22, 2006
 
 This Notice of Articles was issued by the Registrar on June 22, 2006, 11:04 AM Pacific Time
 Incorporation Number BC0663117
 Recognition Date: January 31, 2003 as a result of an Amalgamation
 
 NOTICE OF ARTICLES
 Name of Company:
 
  Mailing Address:
    
    Delivery Address:700, 595 HOWE STREET
    
    700, 595 HOWE STREETVANCOUVER BC V6C 2T5
    
    VANCOUVER BC V6C 2T5CANADA
    
    CANADA
 
  Mailing Address:
    
    Delivery Address:700, 595 HOWE STREET
    
    700, 595 HOWE STREETVANCOUVER BC V6C 2T5
    
    VANCOUVER BC V6C 2T5CANADA
    
    CANADA




---



##### 



DIRECTOR INFORMATION
 Last Name, First name, Middle Name:
 Mailing Address:
    
    Delivery Address:2170 NELSON AVENUE
    
    2170 NELSON AVENUEWEST VANCOUVER BC V7V 2P7
    
    WEST VANCOUVER BC V7V 2P7CANADA
    
    CANADA
 
 Last Name, First name, Middle Name:
 Mailing Address:
    
    Delivery Address:1569 DEMPSEY ROAD
    
    1569 DEMPSEY ROADNORTH VANCOUVER BC V7K 1S8
    
    NORTH VANCOUVER BC V7K 1S8CANADA
    
    CANADA
 
 Last Name, First name, Middle Name:
 Mailing Address:
    
    Delivery Address:1229 MODOC DRIVE
    
    1229 MODOC DRIVEBELLINGHAM WA
    
    BELLINGHAM WAUNITED STATES
    
    UNITED STATES
 
 Last Name, First name, Middle Name:
 Mailing Address:
    
    Delivery Address:3508 MATHERS AVE
    
    3508 MATHERS AVENUEVANCOUVER BC V7V 2K9
    
    VANCOUVER BC V7V 2K9CANADA
    
    CANADA
 
 Last Name, First name, Middle Name:
 Mailing Address:
    
    Delivery Address:4337 PINE CRESCENT
    
    4337 PINE CRESCENTVANCOUVER BC V6J 4K9
    
    VANCOUVER BC V6J 4K9CANADA
    
    CANADA
 
  
 1.     No Maximum          COMMON SHARES
    
    Without Par Value
Without Special Rights or
Restrictions attached
#### § 129.1 Current good manufacturing practice.

The applicable criteria in parts 110 and 117 of this chapter, as well as the criteria in §§ 129.20, 129.35, 129.37, 129.40, and 129.80 shall apply in determining whether the facilities, methods, practices, and controls used in the processing, bottling, holding, and shipping of bottled drinking water are in conformance with or are operated or administered in conformity with good manufacturing practice to assure that bottled drinking water is safe and that it has been processed, bottled, held, and transported under sanitary conditions.

[80 FR 56167, Sept. 17, 2015]
38677. 38678. 38679. 38680. 38681.

#### WALKER *et al.*v. THE STATE. PATTERSON *et al.*v. THE STATE. ROBINSON *et al.*v. THE STATE. WILSON *et al.*v. THE STATE. HOWARD *et al.*v. THE STATE.

Decided January 18, 1961.

Frankum, Judge.

Each defendant named in the accusations in the above stated cases was tried and convicted in the City Court of Savannah of a misdemeanor, specifically a violation of the following quoted law of this State: “It shall be unlawful for any person, who is on the premises of another, to refuse and fail to leave said premises when requested to do so by the owner or any person in charge of said premises or the agent or employee of such owner or such person in charge. Any person violating the provisions of this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be punished as for a misdemeanor.” Ga. L. 1960, p. 142 *(Code Ann.*§ 26-3005). Each defendant sought a new trial, which was refused. The cases were appealed to the Supreme Court of Georgia, which court was asked to declare the above quoted statute unconstitutional; no constitutional question was properly raised, and the cases were transferred to this court by the Supreme Court. See *Walker v. State,*216 Ga. 474 (117 S. E. 2d 156).

The only question before this court is whether the evidence applicable to each respective defendant is sufficient to sustain a conviction. That question must be answered in the affirmative because the evidence shows, without dispute, that each defendant violated the above quoted statute. The respective motions for a new trial were properly overruled.

*Judgments affirmed.*

*Townsend, P. J., Carlisle and Jordan, JJ., concur.*

*71
      *B. Clarence Mayfield, E. H. Gadsden,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Andrew J. Ryan, Jr., Solicitor-General, Sylvan A. Garfunkel, Assistant Solicitor-General,*contra.
Exhibit 32.1

FIRST MARINER BANCORP  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to, and for purposes only of, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, I, Edwin F. Hale, Sr., Chief Executive Officer of First Mariner Bancorp (the
"Company") hereby certify that (i) the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Dated: March 14, 2008 |  | /s/EDWIN F. HALE, SR.Edwin F. Hale, Sr. Chief Executive
Officer
|--------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CirTran Corporation on Form 10-QSB
for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Iehab Hawatmeh, President and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

May 20, 2004
                                /s/ Iehab J. Hawatmeh
                              ------------------------------------------
                              Iehab J. Hawatmeh
                              President and Chief Financial Officer
#### People of State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Willie Wilson, Defendant-Appellant.

Gen. No. 53,225. (Abstract of Decision.)

First District, Second Division.

May 20, 1969.

No briefs filed for this opinion.

Opinion by

MR. JUSTICE BURKE.

Not to be published in full.
# Methyl Bromide Inventory

16,422 MT

12,994 MT

9,974 MT

7,941 MT
6,458 MT
6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000MethylBromide(MT)



# 4,271 MT 3,064 MT 1,803 MT 1,249 MT 627 MT

0 2,000 4,000 6,000



# 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012MethylBromide(MT)



# End of Year Inventory



# Values are for the amount of inventory at the end of that year.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**3 KA 11-00690** 
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DANIEL W. LEWIS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (DREW R. DUBRIN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (NANCY GILLIGAN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Stephen T. Miller, A.J.), rendered January 28, 2011. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of rape in the second degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of rape in the second degree (Penal Law § 130.30 [1]), defendant contends that County Court erred in issuing an order of protection on behalf of an individual who was the complainant with respect to an uncharged sexual offense that was satisfied by defendant’s plea. Defendant’s contention is unpreserved for our review inasmuch as he “failed to challenge the issuance of the order of protection at sentencing or to seek vacatur of the final order of protection” ( People v Morris , 82 AD3d 908, 909, lv denied 17 NY3d 808; see People v Reynolds , 85 AD3d 825, 825-826 lv denied 18 NY3d 927). We reject defendant’s related contention that his challenge to the order of protection need not be preserved because it renders his sentence illegal. Although an order of protection is issued at sentencing, it is not a part of a defendant’s sentence ( see People v Nieves , 2 NY3d 310, 316; People v Lilley , 81 AD3d 1448, 1448, lv denied 17 NY3d 860). In any event, defendant waived his challenge by agreeing to the order of protection when he pleaded guilty ( see generally People v Farewell
, 90 AD3d 1502, 1503, lv denied 18 NY3d 957).

Entered: February 13, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 39 (Monday, March 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9230-9231]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4178]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as

[[Page 9231]]

amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; Member Conflict: Traumatic Brain Injury and Stroke 
Intervention.
    Date: March 10-11, 2010.
    Time: 11 a.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892. (Virtual Meeting)
    Contact Person: Kevin Walton, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Room 5200, MSC 7846, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-
1785, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c6ada3b0afa8e8b1a7aab2a9a886a8afaee8aeaeb5e8a1a9b0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6c07091a0502421b0d001803022c0205044204041f420b031a">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research; 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 23, 2010.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-4178 Filed 2-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### GUSSIE SANDERS, RESPONDENT, v. HUDSON AND MANHATTAN RAILROAD CO., APPELLANT.

Submitted February 17, 1939

Decided April 21, 1939.

For the respondent, *Morris Edelstein.*

For the appellant, *Collins & Corbin.*

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Perskie in the Supreme Court.

*377
      *For affirmance*— The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ.12.

*For reversal*— Donges, J. 1.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         321,486
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  510,767
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (71,503)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      65,589,937
<DEPRECIATION>                            (32,347,635)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              47,863,893
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,275,603
<BONDS>                                     43,060,394
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,527,896
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                47,863,893
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,318,617
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               18,264,039
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (4,695)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,331,270
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,368,424)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,368,424)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,368,424)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (15.93)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (15.93)
        

</TABLE>
#### § 520.2260 Sulfamethazine oral dosage forms.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 20

- 00015

- CR

Bronwen Victoria MCHENRY

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court

, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 18

- 0847

- CR

- A

Honorable Jessica Crawford , Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, we MODIFY the trial court’s December 3, 2019 Judgment Adjudicating Guilt as follows:

Under the heading “Plea to Motion to Adjudicate,” we delete “True” and MODIFY the judgment to state “Not True.”

We AFFIRM the trial court’s judgment as modified.

SIGNED January 27, 2021.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez

, Chief Justice
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AS OF AND FOR
THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MAY 3, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-03-1997
<CASH>                                           4,716
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     38,513
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                46,659
<PP&E>                                          17,425
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,481
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  94,603
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           34,409
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            49
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         36 
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,500
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    94,603
<SALES>                                         60,436
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                60,436
<CGS>                                           39,313
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   39,313
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                21,206
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,277
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,360) 
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,360)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,360)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.60)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.60)
        

</TABLE>