alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB for the period ended June 30, 2004 (the Report) of The Southern Banc Company, Inc. (the Company), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, the undersigned, Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered
in the Report.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |     |  |                                                      
|------------------------ |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|Date: September 28, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ Gates Little                                     
|                         |  |     |  | Gates Little                                         
|                         |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer                
|                         |  |     |  | (Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer)



A signed original of
the written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The information
furnished herein shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                          62,401
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,479
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        741
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               105,290
<PP&E>                                          34,954
<DEPRECIATION>                                  24,779
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 143,133
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,882
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        58,887
<OTHER-SE>                                      35,944
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   143,133
<SALES>                                         40,410
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                40,410
<CGS>                                            8,485
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   29,615
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,727
<INCOME-TAX>                                       544
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,183
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,183
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.22
        

</TABLE>
# L_2018045EN.01000101.xml

| 17.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 45/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 45/1

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2018/230

of 16 February 2018

conferring protection under Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the name ‘Monor, Monori’ (PDO)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the Eurpean Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (1), and in particular Article 99 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | In accordance with Article 97(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the Commission has examined the application to register the name ‘Monor, Monori’ sent by Hungary and has published it in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

In accordance with Article 97(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the Commission has examined the application to register the name ‘Monor, Monori’ sent by Hungary and has published it in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | No statement of objection has been received by the Commission under Article 98 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

No statement of objection has been received by the Commission under Article 98 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.

| (3) | In accordance with Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the name ‘Monor, Monori’ should be protected and entered in the register referred to in Article 104 of that Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

In accordance with Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the name ‘Monor, Monori’ should be protected and entered in the register referred to in Article 104 of that Regulation.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Monor, Monori’ (PDO) is hereby protected.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 February 2018.

For the Commission

The President

Jean-Claude JUNCKER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 329, 30.9.2017, p. 4.

2

---
38835.

#### MATHEWS v. THE STATE.

Decided May 24, 1961.

*James R. Venable, Essley B. Burdine,*for plaintiff in error.

*D. M. Johnson, Solicitor-General,*contra.

Jordan, Judge.

John J. Mathews was tried and convicted in the Superior Court of Clayton County for the offense of burglary. His motion for a new trial on the general and two special grounds was denied, and the exception-is to that judgment. *Held:*

1. The first special ground of the amended motion for new trial contends that the court erred in refusing to declare a mistrial for the reason that the answer of a witness for the State to a question propounded to him by the solicitor-general put the defendant’s character in issue when he had not done so himself. The witness, O. W. Allen, a detective with the Atlanta Police Department, in answer to the question, “State to the court your purpose of going to his [the defendant’s] home,” testified as follows: “We went to his home looking for some stolen goods.” Since the court promptly sustained the objection of counsel for the defendant to this testimony and ruled out the question and answer objected to, and instructed the jury not to consider the witness’s testimony, this ground is without merit. *Carrigan v. State,*206 Ga. 707 (2) (58 S. E. 2d 407); *Stanford v. State,*201 Ga. 173 (2) (38 S. E. 2d 823); *Eden v. State,*43 Ga. App. 414 (1) (159 S. E. 134).

2. Where stolen goods are found in the possession of the defendant charged with burglary, recently after the commission of the offense, that fact would authorize the jury to infer that the accused was guilty, unless he explained his possession to their satisfaction. *Morris v. State,*47 Ga. App. 792, 795 (171 S. E. 555). Special ground 2 which assigns error on that portion of the court’s charge, which embodied this principle ■ of law, is without merit.

3. The general grounds of the motion for new trial, not having been referred to or argued by counsel for the defendant, are considered abandoned.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Townsend, P. J., and Frankum, J., concur.*
§ 520.2473b Tioxidazole paste. ( a ) *Specifications.* Each plastic syringe contains 6.25 grams of tioxidazole.
( b ) *Sponsor.* See No. 000061 in § 510.600(c) of this chapter.
( c ) *Conditions of use* — ( 1 ) *Horses* — ( i ) *Amount.* 5 milligrams of tioxidazole per pound of body weight as a single dose.
( ii ) *Indications for use.* Removal of mature large strongyles (*Strongylus edentatus, S. equinus,* and *S. vulgaris*), mature ascarids (*Parascaris equorum*), mature and immature (4th larval stage) pinworms (*Oxyuris equi*), and mature small strongyles (*Triodontophorus* spp.).
( iii ) *Limitations.* Administer orally by inserting the nozzle of the syringe through the space between front and back teeth and deposit the required dose on the base of the tongue. Before dosing, make sure the horse's mouth contains no feed. Not for use in horses intended for food. The reproductive safety of tioxidazole in breeding animals has not been determined. Consult your veterinarian for assistance in the diagnosis, treatment, and control of parasitism. It is recommended that this drug be administered with caution to sick or debilitated horses.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
[52 FR 43059, Nov. 9, 1987]
Exhibit 31.1  CERTIFICATION  I, Richard A. Steinke, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Amerityre Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  Date: September 12, 2006  /s/Richard A. Steinke
Richard A. Steinke
Chief Executive Officer
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Employment Projections for the 1980's

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Employment Projections for the 1980's : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 2030*,												Washington, D.C: 								The Bureau, 										June 1979,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4726,			accessed on September 18, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
[No. 39723-1-I.

Division One.

December 22, 1997.]

#### James C. Coghlan, et al., *Respondents,*v. Jack G. Hennemann, et al., *Appellants.*

Appeal from judgments of the Superior Court for King County, No. 93-2-08403-0, Nancy Ann Holman, Larry A. Jordan, and Deborah D. Fleck, JJ., entered September 30, 1993, September 27, 1994, and October 7, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Becker, J., concurred in by Cox and Ellington, JJ.
No. 76-1160.

#### Allied Mills, Inc. *v.*National Labor Relations Board.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit 31**

 

**EXHIBIT 31 — SECTION 302 CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Theodore L. Arena, and I, Thomas J. Mulroney, each separately certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Provena Foods Inc. (the“Company”); 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and l5d-15(e)) for the Company and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the Company, including any subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors: 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) Any fraud. whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control overfinancial reporting. 

 

Date: July 28, 2005
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.1
                                        


                            SEER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                              List of Subsidiaries


DOMESTIC COMPANIES

Parent Company:

       SEER Technologies, Inc.

       Date of Incorporation:     03/06/90
       State of Incorporation:    Delaware

Subsidiary:
 
       SEER  Technologies (Worldwide Holdings) Limited
 
       Date of Incorporation:     02/26/92
       State of Incorporation:    Delaware
 
FOREIGN SUBSIDIARIES
 
Argentina:
 
       SEER Technologies de Argentine S.A.
 
       Date of Incorporation:     09/20/96
 

Australia:
 
       SEER Technologies Australia Pty Limited
 
       Date of Registration:      08/09/93
 

Barbados:
 
       SEER Technologies FSC, Inc.
 
       Date of Registration:      12/27/95


Benelux:

       Seer Technologies Benelux B.V.

       Date of Registration:      09/25/92

                                     E-46
<PAGE>
 
Brazil:

       SEER Technologies do Brazil Ltda.

       Date of Registration:      12/09/93

 
Canada:
 
       SEER Technologies Canada, Inc.
 
       Domestic Province:         Ontario
       Date of Registration:      05/18/94

 
Denmark:
 
       SEER Technologies Denmark ApS
 
       Date of Registration:      04/01/94
 

France:
 
       SEER Technologies France S.A.R.L.
 
       Date of Incorporation:     06/09/95

 
Germany:
 
       SEER Technologies Europe (Deutschland) GmbH
 
       Date of Registration:      11/19/92
 

Hong Kong:
 
       SEER Technologies Hong Kong Limited
 
       Date of Registration:      12/14/94
 

Ireland:
 
       SEER Technologies Ireland Limited
 
       Date of Registration:      03/11/95


Italy:

       SEER Technologies Italia S.r.L.

       Date of Registration:      08/07/92


                                     E-47
<PAGE>
 
Mexico:

       SEER Technologies de Mexico S.A. de C.V.

       Date of Registration:    11/08/95


Korea:

       SEER Korea Co., Limited

       Date of Registration:    07/07/97


Sweden:

       SEER Technologies Nordic AB

       Date of Registration:    07/09/92
 

Singapore:
 
       SEER Technologies Singapore Pty Lte.
 
       Date of Incorporation:   02/11/95


Spain:

       SEER Technologies Espana, S.L.

       Date of Registration:    07/22/93


United Kingdom:

       SEER Technologies (U.K.) Limited

       Date of Registration:    01/07/92
 

                                     E-48
§ 169.182 Vanilla-vanillin powder. ( a ) Vanilla-vanillin powder conforms to the definition and standard of identity and is subject to any requirement for label statement of ingredients prescribed for vanilla powder by § 169.179, except that for each unit of vanilla constituent as defined in § 169.3(c) contained therein, the article also contains not more than 1 ounce of added vanillin.
( b ) The specified name of the food is “Vanilla-vanillin powder __-fold” or “__-fold vanilla-vanillin powder”, followed immediately by the statement “contains vanillin, an artificial flavor (or flavoring)”. If sugar is the optional blending ingredient used, the word “sugar” may replace the word “powder” in the name. The blank in the name is filled in with the whole number (disregarding fractions) expressing the sum of the number of units of vanilla constituent plus the number of ounces of added vanillin per 8 pounds of the article. However, if the strength of the article is less than 2-fold the term “__-fold” is omitted from the name.
[42 FR 14479, Mar. 15, 1977, as amended at 58 FR 2887, Jan. 6, 1993]