alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PUBLIC LAW 108–247—JUNE 25, 2004 118 STAT. 681

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3353:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:

Vol. 149 (2003): Nov. 17, considered and passed House.

Vol. 150 (2004): June 9, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 108–247

108th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 525 Main

Street in Tarboro, North Carolina, as the ‘‘George Henry White Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

525 Main Street in Tarboro, North Carolina, shall be known and

designated as the ‘‘George Henry White Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘George

Henry White Post Office Building’’.

Approved June 25, 2004.

June 25, 2004

[H.R. 3353]
### Geophysical investigation of sentinel lakes in Lake, Seminole, Orange, and Volusia Counties, Florida

By: Christopher ReichJames FlocksJeffrey Davis

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20121201

#### Links

- More information:  **USGS Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Appendix:  **Appendix**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(a)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Report on Form 10-Q of International Absorbents Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: September 9, 2005
    
    /s/ David H. ThompsonDavid H. ThompsonSecretary and Chief Financial Officer
### Hydrologic conditions and artificial recharge through a well in the Salem Heights area of Salem, Oregon

By: B. L. Foxworthy

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1594F

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 96-3639SI

_____________ Sheila M. Mikkelsen, * * Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Southern * District of Iowa. Jennie Edmundson Memorial Hospital; * Iowa Benefits, Inc., * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. *

_____________ Submitted: May 23, 1997

Filed: May 30, 1997

_____________ Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. Shei la M. Mikkelsen appeals the district court's adverse grant of summar y judgment. At the time of her hospitalization for psychiatric evaluation, Mikkelsen was covered under an insurance policy through her employer. Iowa Benefits, Inc. denied cove rage under a pre-existing condition clause of the insurance plan, and Mikkelse n brought this action against Iowa Benefits and the hospital for misrepresentation of the hospitali zation coverage. Finding no genuine issues of material fact and that th e defenda nts' version of the facts was admitted by Mikkelsen, the district court granted summary judgment. The district court also held that Mikkelsen's estoppel claim was-2-

preempted by the Employment Retirement Income Security Act, and even if the claim wa s recognized, that Mikkelsen failed to "demonstrate the facts necessary to support her claim." Having reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we agree with th e distric t court's analysis and affirm for the reasons stated in the district court' s memorandum opinion. We decline to c onsider issues raised by Mikkelsen for the first time on appeal. We also deny Iowa Benefits's request for an award of attorney's fees. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
§ 26.18 Regulatory collaboration. ( a ) The parties and authorities shall inform and consult one another, as permitted by law, on proposals to introduce new controls or to change existing technical regulations or inspection procedures and to provide the opportunity to comment on such proposals.
( b ) The parties shall notify each other in writing of any changes to appendix B of this subpart.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 8, 2017

No. 04-16-00783-CR

IN RE Adam GONZALES

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Relator filed this petition for writ of mandamus on December 2, 2016, complaining that 

the trial court had not ruled on his motions for post-conviction DNA testing and for appointment 

of counsel in connection with his request for DNA testing. On January 24, 2017, Respondent 

filed a copy of an order denying the motions. Because the trial court has ruled on the motions, 

Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus has been rendered moot. Accordingly, this original 

mandamus proceeding is DISMISSED AS MOOT.

It is so ORDERED on February 8, 2017.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 8th day of February, 2017.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk

 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. A02-136, styled State v. Adam Gonzales, in the 216th Judicial District 

Court, Kerr County, Texas, the Honorable N. Keith Williams presiding.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). A H / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T AD R I AN ME L GO Z A, P e titio n e r- A p p e llan t, v. R I C H A R D K I R K L A N D , A s s o c ia te W ar de n, R e s p o n d e n t - A p p e lle e . N o. 08- 16837 D . C . N o . 5 : 0 6 -cv -0 4 8 6 1 -JW ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e N o rth e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia J a m e s W ar e , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d M ar c h 16, 2010 ** B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , P R E G E R S O N , an dR A W L IN S O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. C alifo rn ia state p riso n erA d rian M elg o zaap p ea ls fr o m th e d istrict co u rt’s di s m i s s a l of

hi s 28 U . S . C . § 2254 habe a s pe t i t i on a s unt i m e l yf i l e d. W e ha ve ju r is d ic tio n p u r s u an t to 2 8 U .S .C . § 2 2 5 3 , an dw e r e v e r s e a n dr e m an d . 

# FI LED MA R 26 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSA H / Res ea r ch 08- 16837

M e l goz ac ont e nds tha tthe di s tr i c tc ourtw r ongl yc a l c ul a t e d the due da t e of hi s habea s pet i t i on , and that , contraryt o the di stri ctcourt ’ s hol di ng , hi s habea s pe t i t i on w a s t i m e l yf

i l e d. A s the S t a t e c om m e ndabl ya c know l e dge s on appe a l , the d is tr ic t c o u rt f

a ile dto ap p lyth e p r is o n e rm a ilb o x ru le , an dth e r e f o r e w r o n g ly c a lc u la te dth e le n g th o f

th e e q u itab le to llin g p e r io d . M e lg o z ais e n title dto a d d itio n a l to llin g u n d e rth e p r is o n e rm a ilb o x ru le . See R am i rez v . Y ates , 571 F . 3d 9 9 3 , 9 9 6 n . 1 (9 th C i r. 2 0 0 9 ) (i n t ern al q u o t at i o n s an dci t at i o n s o m i tt ed ). T h u s, w he n M e l goz ade l i ve r e d hi s habe a s pe t i t i on t o pr i s on of f i c i a l s on A ugus t8, 2006, it w a s tim e lyw h e n th e to llin g a c k n o w le d g e db yth e S ta te is ta k e n in to c o n s id e r a tio n . See J

orss v. G om ez , 3 1 1 F . 3 d1 1 8 9 , 1 1 9 2 (9 th C i r. 2 0 0 2 ). B ecau se M elg o za ’s fe d er al h ab ea s p etit io n is ti m ely, w e r ev er se th e d istrict co u rt’s j u d g m en td i sm i ssi n g M el g o za’ s p et i t i o n , an drem an dfo r fu rth er p ro ceed i n g s. T h e ap p o in tm e n t o f

c o u n s e l s h a ll c o n tin u e o n r e m an dto th e d is tr ic t c o u rt. M e lg o z a ’s m o tio n f

o rju d ic ia l n o tic e is g r an te d . M e l goz a ’ s m ot i ons f

ors um m aryr e ve r s a l a nd i m m e di a t e i s s uanc e of the m an d a te a r e d e n ie da s m o o t. RE V E RS E D A ND RE MAND E D.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7399 

To terminate the American Community Survey, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2024 

Mr. VAN DREW (for himself, Mr. DUNCAN, and Mr. SMITH of Nebraska) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To terminate the American Community Survey, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Community 

5 Survey Elimination Act’’ or the ‘‘ACSE Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY. 

7 The Secretary of Commerce or the Bureau of the 

8 Census may not carry out the American Community SurVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:21 Feb 24, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H7399.IH H7399

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 7399 IH

1 vey, and no Federal funds may be obligated or expended 

2 to carry out such Survey (or any similar survey). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
EXHIBIT 23
                                   ----------

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
                         -------------------------------

      We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) of Toys "R" Us, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated March 8, 2000,
included in the 1999 Annual Report to Stockholders of Toys "R" Us, Inc. and
subsidiaries.

      We also consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration
Statements (Form S-4 Number 33-56303 and 333-18863; Form S-3 Numbers 2-87794,
33-23264, 33-34273, 33-11461, 33-42237 and 33-51359; Form S-8 Numbers 2-64887,
2-91834, 33-42627, 333-11861, 333-15841, 333-23441, 333-20385, 33-64315,
333-61827 and 333-82377) of Toys "R" Us, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report
dated March 8, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
incorporated herein by reference.

                                       /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

New York, New York
April 26, 2000
###### Editorial Note on Part 137

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 137 appear at 63 FR 14035, Mar. 24, 1998.

#### § 137.285 Degerminated yellow corn meal.

Degerminated yellow corn meal, degermed yellow corn meal, conforms to the definition and standard of identity prescribed by § 137.265 for degerminated white corn meal except that cleaned yellow corn is used instead of cleaned white corn.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


 


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


 


 


In connection with the Annual Report for Digatrade Financial Corp
on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report), the undersigned, Brad J. Moynes, Chief Financial Officer do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:


 


 


(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) of the Securities


Exchange Act of 1934; and


 


(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the


Financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.


 


 


By:


 


 


/s/ Brad J. Moynes


Brad J. Moynes


Chief Financial Officer


May 1, 2017


 




 



    	 	 	 



    	 	 	 



    

 







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


 


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


 


 


In connection with the Annual Report for Digatrade Financial Corp
on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report), the undersigned, Brad J. Moynes, Chief Executive Officer do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:


 


 


(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) of the Securities


Exchange Act of 1934; and


 


(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the


Financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.


 


 


By:


 


 


/s/ Brad J. Moynes


Brad J. Moynes


Chief Executive Officer


May 1, 2017
<PAGE>   1
                        [PERKINS COIE LLP LETTERHEAD]
                                 June 16, 1998

InControl, Inc.
6675 - 18th Ave. NE 
Redmond, WA 98052

          RE:       REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM S-3

Gentlemen and Ladies:

          We have acted as counsel to you in connection with the preparation of
a Registration Statement on Form S-3 (the "Registration Statement") under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Act"), which you are filing with the
Securities and Exchange Commission for the resale of up to 400,000 shares of
Common Stock, $.01 par value (the "Shares"). We have examined the Registration
Statement and such documents and records of the Company and other documents as
we have deemed necessary for the purpose of this opinion.

          Based upon and subject to the foregoing, we are of the opinion that
the Shares have been duly authorized and are validly issued, fully paid and
nonassessable.

          We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement. In giving such consent, we do not admit that we are in
the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Act.

                                                  Very truly yours,

                                              /s/ PERKINS COIE LLP
                                             -----------------------
                                                  Perkins Coie LLP
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7385 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

29 Franklin Street in Petersburg, Virginia, as the ‘‘John Mercer 

Langston Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2024 

Ms. MCCLELLAN (for herself, Mr. BEYER, Mr. CLINE, Mr. CONNOLLY, Mr. 

GOOD of Virginia, Mr. GRIFFITH, Mrs. KIGGANS of Virginia, Mr. SCOTT

of Virginia, Ms. SPANBERGER, Ms. WEXTON, and Mr. WITTMAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 29 Franklin Street in Petersburg, Virginia, 

as the ‘‘John Mercer Langston Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. JOHN MERCER LANGSTON POST OFFICE 

4 BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 29 Franklin Street in Peters7 burg, Virginia, shall be known and designated as the 

8 ‘‘John Mercer Langston Post Office Building’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 7385 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘John Mercer 

5 Langston Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Front Range Capital Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Alice M. Voss, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                        /s/ Alice M. Voss
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Alice M. Voss
                                        Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Front Range Capital and will be retained by Front Range Capital
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
§ 333.301 Scope. ( a ) An over-the-counter acne drug product in a form suitable for topical application is generally recognized as safe and effective and is not misbranded if it meets each of the conditions in this subpart and each general condition established in § 330.1 of this chapter.
( b ) References in this subpart to regulatory sections of the Code of Federal Regulations are to chapter I of title 21 unless otherwise noted.