alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 507.65 Contents of an order to withdraw a qualified facility exemption. An order to withdraw a qualified facility exemption under § 507.5(d) must include the following information: ( a ) The date of the order;
( b ) The name, address, and location of the qualified facility;
( c ) A brief, general statement of the reasons for the order, including information relevant to one or both of the following circumstances that leads FDA to issue the order: ( 1 ) An active investigation of a foodborne illness outbreak that is directly linked to the facility; or
( 2 ) Conditions or conduct associated with a qualified facility that are material to the safety of the animal food manufactured, processed, packed, or held at such facility.
( d ) A statement that the facility must either: ( 1 ) Comply with subparts C and E of this part on the date that is 120 calendar days after the date of receipt of the order or within a reasonable timeframe, agreed to by FDA, based on a written justification, submitted to FDA, for a timeframe that exceeds 120 calendar days from the date of receipt of the order; or
( 2 ) Appeal the order within 15 calendar days of the date of receipt of the order in accordance with the requirements of § 507.69.
( e ) A statement that a facility may request that FDA reinstate an exemption that was withdrawn by following the procedures in § 507.85;
( f ) The text of section 418(l) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and of this subpart;
( g ) A statement that any informal hearing on an appeal of the order must be conducted as a regulatory hearing under part 16 of this chapter, with certain exceptions described in § 507.73;
( h ) The mailing address, telephone number, email address, fax number, and name of the FDA Division Director in whose division the facility is located (or, in the case of a foreign facility, the same information for the Director of the Division of Compliance in the Center for Veterinary Medicine); and
( i ) The name and the title of the FDA representative who approved the order.
[80 FR 56337, Sept. 17, 2015, as amended at 81 FR 3718, Jan. 22, 2016; 85 FR 16554, Mar. 24, 2020]
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Annual Report of Independence CommunityBank Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for theperiod ending December 31, 2004 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Frank W. Baier, Executive VicePresident, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and PrincipalAccounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities    Exchange Act of 1934; and           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Company.     /s/ Frank W. Baier           Frank W. Baier *Executive Vice President,* *Chief Financial Officer,* *Treasurer and Principal Accounting Officer*March 11, 2005     A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided toIndependence Community Bank Corp. and will be retained byIndependence Community Bank Corp. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7363

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DEMAR LAMONT MOORE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CR95-170; CA-03-1954) Submitted: July 21, 2004 Decided: September 21, 2004 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Demar Lamont Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Demar Lamont Moore, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district court absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find both that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Moore has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.31



       AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN ENACT PHARMA PLC AND CHIMAERON LTD
                              DATED 1ST APRIL 2000.



1st December 2001

The paragraph referring to Consultant's Fees shall be amended to read "The fee
is at present L90,000 per annum exclusive of VAT, or such other rate as
may be agreed from time to time payable monthly in arrears by bank credit
transfer. This agreement shall be terminable by either party giving to the
other not less than six months' prior written notice."



Signed for both Parties by:




/s/ signature to come                           /s/ M.A. Atkinson
-----------------------------                   ------------------------------
for and on behalf of                            for and on behalf of
ENACT PHARMA PLC                                CHIMAERON LTD
exv10w3



 







EXHIBIT 10.3




FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE




TRW AUTOMOTIVE BENEFIT EQUALIZATION PLAN




(Effective as of January 1, 2005)




          TRW Automotive U.S. LLC (the “Company”) hereby adopts this First Amendment to the TRW
Automotive Benefit Equalization Plan (Effective as of February 28, 2003) (the “Plan”), effective as
of the dates set forth herein.




RECITALS



A. The Company adopted and maintains the Plan for the benefit of certain of its eligible employees
and retirees.



B. The Company desires to modify the election rules and procedures under the Plan to comply with
the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, effective as of January 1, 2005.



C. The Company desires to amend the Plan to reflect the appointment of Fidelity Investments as the
new recordkeeper for the Plan, effective as of July 1, 2004.



NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:





	 	1.	 	Effective as of January 1, 2005, Section 3(b) is hereby amended by deleting the
phrase “unless the Participant elects zero percent” where it appears in the second
sentence thereof.
	 
	 	2.	 	Effective January 1, 2005, Section 5(a)(i) is amended in its entirety to read as
follows:






          (i) the Participant’s becoming disabled, as defined by Section 409A of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) and regulations promulgated
thereunder;




	 	3.	 	Effective January 1, 2005, Section 5(c) is amended by adding the following new
sentence to the end thereof:
	 
	 	 	 	For purposes hereof, a participant shall be deemed to have an “emergency event beyond his
control which would impose an immediate and heavy financial hardship”, if he experiences an
“unforeseeable emergency”, as defined by Section 409A of the Code and regulations
promulgated thereunder.




 









 






	 	4.	 	Effective as of January 1, 2005, Section 6 is hereby amended by added the following
new subsections (f) and (g) to the end thereof:






     (f) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, to the extent required by the
American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 and Code Section 409A with respect of amounts earned or
vested under the Plan in any plan year beginning on or after January 1, 2005, a participant
must elect the form in which such amounts shall be paid upon retirement in the year
immediately preceding the plan year in which services are performed. Except as otherwise
provided in applicable Treasury Regulations, any such election shall be irrevocable. If
the Participant fails to make an election under this subsection (f), payment shall be made
in the form of a single sum.




     (g) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, to the extent required by the
American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 and Code Section 409A, distribution to a participant who
is a “key employee” must be delayed at least 6 months after the last day worked.




	 	5.	 	Effective as of July 1, 2004, the Plan is hereby amended by replacing all references
to Putnam Fiduciary Trust Company or Putnam with references to Fidelity Investments or
Fidelity.




EXECUTED this 18th day of November, 2004.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	TRW Automotive U.S. LLC

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ David L. Bialosky
#### § 520.2345 Tetracycline.
§ 507.71 Procedure for requesting an informal hearing. ( a ) If you appeal the order, you: ( 1 ) May request an informal hearing; and
( 2 ) Must submit any request for an informal hearing together with your written appeal submitted in accordance with § 507.69 within 15 calendar days of the date of receipt of the order.
( b ) A request for an informal hearing may be denied, in whole or in part, if the presiding officer determines that no genuine and substantial issue of material fact has been raised by the material submitted. If the presiding officer determines that a hearing is not justified, written notice of the determination will be given to you explaining the reason for the denial.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the quarterly report of Avitar,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form10-QSB for the period ending  December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jay C. Leatherman,
Jr.,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the  Company  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, to my knowledge, that:

     (1) The Report  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a)
or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: February 13, 2004

                                      /s/ Jay C. Leatherman, Jr.
                                      -------------------------
                                      Jay C. Leatherman, Jr.
                                      Chief Financial Officer (Principal
                                      Financial and Accounting Officer),
                                      Secretary
EXHIBIT  99.1
CONCEPTS DIRECT, INC. PRESS RELEASE

Concepts Direct, Inc.
2950 Colorful Avenue, Longmont, Colorado 80504

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Friday, February 2, 2001

CONCEPTS DIRECT, INC. ANNOUNCES LISTING ON NASDAQ SMALL CAP MARKET

Longmont, Colorado, February 2, 2001 - Concepts Direct, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDIR)
announced today that its shares of common stock will be listed on the Nasdaq
Small Cap Market rather than the Nasdaq National Market effective February 5,
2001.  The shares will continue to trade under the symbol "CDIR." The change
results from a Nasdaq National Market's listing regulation that requires a
minimum public float value of $5 million.

J. Michael Wolfe, President and CEO of Concepts Direct, said, "Given that some
large blocks of our stock are held by insiders, current market conditions
preclude us from meeting the minimum public float requirement for the Nasdaq
National Market.  When market conditions change, we expect to once again list
our stock on the Nasdaq National Market."

About Concepts Direct, Inc.

Concepts Direct is a direct marketing company focused on building and managing
customer relationships through its catalogs and internet retailing
initiatives.  The company sells personalized paper products and a diverse line
of merchandise, including gift items, home decorative items, collectibles and
apparel. Concepts Direct sells its merchandise primarily via the Colorful
Images, Linda Anderson, Snoopy etc., Linda Anderson's Collectibles, and the
Music Stand catalogs.  In addition, the company owns and operates numerous web
sites, including www.ColorfulImages.com,  www.LindaAnderson.com,
www.SnoopyStore.com,  www.theMusicStand.com and  www.NewBargains.com.

Concepts Direct designs and manufactures many of its own products and also
purchases a variety of merchandise from outside vendors and suppliers.  The
company operates on a policy of guaranteed customer satisfaction and is
committed to providing excellent customer service. The Company houses all of
its direct marketing operations at its headquarters in Longmont, CO and sells
its products primarily in the United States.

Cautionary Statement

This press release contains certain forward-looking statements as such term is
defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  Company
statements that are not historical facts, including statements about the
Company's expectations, beliefs, plans and objectives are forward-looking
statements and involve various risks and uncertainties, including the risks
associated with starting new businesses.  Additional discussion of factors
that could cause actual results to differ materially from management's
expectations, beliefs, plans and objectives is contained in the Company's SEC
filings.

For Further Information Contact
Mike Wolfe                            Ben Gill
President & CEO                       Vice President, Business Development
Concepts Direct, Inc.                 Concepts Direct, Inc.
(303) 772-9171                        303-772-9171
mwolfe@conceptsdirectinc.com          bgill@conceptsdirectinc.com
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998             OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1997             NOV-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998             OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,687                   1,190
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   74,561                  53,011
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (350)                   (350)
<INVENTORY>                                     71,613                  87,299
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               156,427                 150,150
<PP&E>                                         100,202                  95,766
<DEPRECIATION>                                  58,518                  50,846
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 314,765                 316,258
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          100,363                  94,294
<BONDS>                                         74,301                  74,245
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                      5,000                   5,000
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (34,046)                (25,503)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   314,765                 316,258
<SALES>                                        392,785                 468,173
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               392,785                 468,173
<CGS>                                          344,327                 425,119
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  390,425                 467,499
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,836                  13,228
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,476)                (12,554)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,161)                 (3,013)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,315)                 (9,541)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
§ 352.76 Determination if a product is water resistant or very water resistant. The general testing procedures in § 352.72 shall be used as part of the following tests, except where modified in this section. An indoor fresh water pool, whirlpool, and/or jacuzzi maintained at 23 to 32 °C shall be used in these testing procedures. Fresh water is clean drinking water that meets the standards in 40 CFR part 141. The pool and air temperature and the relative humidity shall be recorded. ( a ) *Procedure for testing the water resistance of a sunscreen product.* For sunscreen products making the claim of “water resistant,” the label SPF shall be the label SPF value determined after 40 minutes of water immersion using the following procedure for the water resistance test: ( 1 ) Apply sunscreen product (followed by the waiting period after application of the sunscreen product indicated on the product labeling).
( 2 ) 20 minutes moderate activity in water.
( 3 ) 20-minute rest period (do not towel test sites).
( 4 ) 20 minutes moderate activity in water.
( 5 ) Conclude water test (air dry test sites without toweling).
( 6 ) Begin solar simulator exposure to test site areas as described in § 352.73.
( b ) *Procedure for testing a very water resistant sunscreen product.* For sunscreen products making the claim of “very water resistant,” the label SPF shall be the label SPF value determined after 80 minutes of water immersion using the following procedure for the very water resistant test: ( 1 ) Apply sunscreen product (followed by the waiting period after application of the sunscreen product indicated on the product labeling).
( 2 ) 20 minutes moderate activity in water.
( 3 ) 20-minute rest period (do not towel test sites).
( 4 ) 20 minutes moderate activity in water.
( 5 ) 20-minute rest period (do not towel test sites).
( 6 ) 20 minutes moderate activity in water.
( 7 ) 20-minute rest period (do not towel test sites).
( 8 ) 20 minutes moderate activity in water.
( 9 ) Conclude water test (air dry test sites without toweling).
( 10 ) Begin solar simulator exposure to test site areas as described in § 352.73.
#### In re Radvansky

*David H. Weiner,*for petitioners.

March 26, 1951.

Per Curiam,

— When this case came before us for a hearing on March 5, 1951, it *366appeared that an additional child had been born, and it also appeared in a certificate of the prothonotary that a chattel mortgage had been filed on January 24, 1951, showing an indebtedness of Alex W. Radvansky to the National Deposit Bank of Brownsville in the sum of $1,234 and costs.

Since section 4 of the Act of April 18, 1923, P. L. 75, provides that where the parents of minor children then under the care of the parents secure a decree changing the name of the parents, the new name of the parents shall thereafter be borne likewise by such minor child or children, it is essential that all minor children be named in the proceeding so that the record of authority of the children to bear the changed name shall exist. Where a child is born after the institution of the proceedings, this might be secured by amendment, but this has not been done.

Section 3 of the act above referred to requires that at the hearing there shall be presented to the court official searches of the proper offices of the county wherein petitioners reside or have resided within five years of the filing of the petition for change of name, showing “that there are no judgments or decrees of record or any other matter of like character against said petitioner or petitioners.”

In this case the certificate of the prothonotary shows that there is of record a charge against one of the petitioners of like character to a judgment for a substantial sum.

We find no appellate court decisions regarding this matter. However, the decisions of the lower courts have been uniform that where such record exists, the petition must fail, This is a jurisdictional requirement and where such record obligations exist and appear on the certificate, the court cannot disregard the proviso in section 3 of the act above referred to: In re Change of Name of Kostzewa, 38 Luz. 72, 12 Somer*367set 149, 58 York 182; DeRenzo’s Petition, 44 D. & C. 699.

And now, March 26, 1951, the application is refused without prejudice to petitioners’ right to renew the same when the requirements of the act have been complied with.
# EUR-Lex - 31984R0564 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31984R0564

**Council Regulation (EEC) No 564/84 of 1 March 1984 on suspension of aids for investments in the field of milk production **

*
Official Journal L 061 , 02/03/1984 P. 0034 - 0034 Spanish special edition: Chapter 03 Volume 29 P. 0313 Portuguese special edition Chapter 03 Volume 29 P. 0313 *

*****

COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) No 564/84

of 1 March 1984

on suspension of aids for investments in the field of milk production

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN

COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, and in particular Article 43 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission (1),

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (2),

Whereas Article 1 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1946/81 of 30 June 1981 restricting investment aids for milk production (3) authorizes Member States to grant aids for investments in milk production;

Whereas, with a view to attaining the Community's objectives in regard to production, in particular the objective of re-establishing market balance for the Community's milk products, all aid for investments directly related to milk production should be suspended until agreement on the control of milk production is reached,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1. By derogation from Regulation (EEC) No 1946/81, the granting of all aid to investments directly concerning milk production shall be suspended from 1 March 1984 until such date as the Council takes the required decisions for implementing the measures necessary for re-establishing market balance for the Community's milk products.

2. Paragraph 1 shall not apply to development plans within the meaning of Directive 72/159/EEC (4), as last amended by Directive 82/436/EEC (5), submitted before 1 March 1984.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 1 March 1984.

For the Council

The President

H. BOUCHARDEAU

(1) OJ No C 18, 25. 1. 1984, p. 6.

(2) Opinion delivered on 23 February 1984 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

(3) OJ No L 197, 20. 7. 1981, p. 32.

(4) OJ No L 96, 23. 4. 1972, p. 1.

(5) OJ No L 193, 3. 7. 1982, p. 37.