alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1






                                 EXHIBIT 23.1


                       Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP

<PAGE>   2





                                                                Exhibit 23.1


INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
EPL Technologies, Inc. on Forms S-3 (Nos. 333-42185 and 333-09719) and on Forms
S-8 (Nos. 333-4306, 333-9795 and 333-42047) of our report dated February 27,
1998 (March 13 as to Note 18) appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
EPL Technologies, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1997.





DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Philadelphia, PA

March 30, 1998
EXHIBIT 32
----------




            CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                        SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
            --------------------------------------------------



     The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be
deemed filed pursuant to any provision of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 or any other securities law:

     Each of the undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on
Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of ARVIDA/JMB PARTNERS, L.P.




                                          /s/   Gary Nickele
                                          ------------------------------
                                          Gary Nickele
                                          Chief Executive Officer




                                          /s/   Gailen J. Hull
                                          ------------------------------
                                          Gailen J. Hull
                                          Chief Financial Officer and
                                          Principal Accounting Officer

43:
#### STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff in Error, v. JOHN WILKSON, Defendant in Error.

St. Louis Court of Appeals,

April 20, 1909.

APPELLATE PRACTICE: Order Quashing Information: Writ of Error. A writ of error will not lie from an order quashing an information'.

Appeal from St. Francois Circuit *Court.*— Eon. *Chas. A. Killian,*Judge.

Dismissed.

*R. C. Tucker*for plaintiff in error.

*Marbury \& Hensley*and *Edward A. Rosier*for defendant in error.

The State can prosecute a writ of error in the Court of Appeals, only in cases where the statute authorizes an appeal; and the statute nowhere authorizes the State to appeal, or to a writ of error from the ruling of the court in quashing an information in a prosecution for misdemeanor. R. S. 1899, sec. 2708, 2709; State v. Beagles, 174 Mo. 627; State y. Rozelle, 174 M'o. 632; State y..R,oss, 119 Mo. App. 401; State y. Adams, 193, Mo. 200; State y. Cornelius, 143 Mo. 179; State y. Carr, 142 Mo. 607; State y. Clipper, 142 Mo. 475.

GOODE, J.

— This is a writ of error from a judgment of the circuit court quashing an information against defendant wherein he was charged with selling intoxicating liquors, to-wit, two kegs of beer and a half-gallon of whisky, in St. Francois county, contrary to the statutes against the sale of intoxicating liquors, which had been adopted in said county, being commonly known as the local option law and consisting of article III, chap*461ter 22, of the Revised Statutes of 1899. The writ must he dismissed because a writ of error will not lie from an order quashing an information. [State v. Rozelle, 174 Mo. 632, State v. Adams, 193 Mo. 200; State v. Ross, 119 Mo. App. 401, 403.]

All concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 99.1


                               ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE

                                  RETAILERS NATIONAL BANK

                           DAYTON HUDSON CREDIT CARD MASTER TRUST


     The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Retailers National 
Bank, as Servicer ("RNB"), pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement 
dated as of September 13, 1995, as supplemented by the Series 1995-1 
Supplement, the Series 1996-1 Supplement, and the Series 1997-1 Supplement 
(as may be amended and supplemented from time to time, the "Agreement"), 
among Dayton Hudson Receivables Corporation, as Transferor, RNB as Servicer, 
and Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association, as Trustee, does hereby 
certify that:

     1. RNB is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Agreement.  
        Capitalized terms used in this Certificate have their respective 
        meanings as set forth in the Agreement.

     2. The undersigned is a Servicing Officer who is duly authorized pursuant
        to the Agreement to execute and deliver this certificate to the Trustee.

     3. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the fiscal year ended
        January 3, 1998, and of its performance under the Agreement was  
        conducted under my supervision.

     4. Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my knowledge, 
        performed in all material respects its obligations under the Agreement
        throughout such year and no default in the performance of such 
        obligations has occurred or is continuing except as set forth in 
        paragraph 5 below.

     5. The following is a description of each default in the performance of the
        Servicer's obligations under the provisions of the Agreement known to me
        to have been made by the Servicer during the fiscal year ended January 
        3, 1998 which sets forth in detail (i) the nature of each default, (ii) 
        the action taken by the Servicer, if any, to remedy each such default 
        and (iii) the current status of each such default: None.


        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate 
as of the 20th day of March, 1998.

                                        RETAILERS NATIONAL BANK,
                                        as Servicer,


                                    By: /s/ Ronald A. Prill
                                        --------------------------
                                           Name:  Ronald A. Prill
                                           Title:  Chairman & CEO
38547.

#### CENTRAL BANK & TRUST COMPANY v. CREEDE.

Bell, Judge.

A conditional-sale contract duly recorded and on its face properly executed and attested is admissible in evidence. A retention-of-title contract or a mortgage may be valid between the parties even though it is unattested or improperly attested and not recorded and not entitled to be recorded because of such improper attestation. *Lane v. American Agricultural Chemical Co.,*44 Ga. App. 432, 433 (3) (161 S. E. 646); *Bank of Ringgold v. West Publishing Co.,*61 Ga. App. 426 (6 S. E. 2d 598); *Benton & Upson v. Baxley, Boles & Co.,*90 Ga. 296 (15 S. E. 820). In the *Bank of Ring-gold*case error was assigned on the admission of the retention-of-title contract in evidence, but this court held that the court did not err in admitting the contract in evidence, its execution having been proved. Where, as in the present ca'se, the vendee under such a contract admits execution, even though one of the attesting witnesses testifies that she has no recollection that she witnessed the signing of the document, the assignee of the vendor has a superior claim to the property as against a subsequent judgment creditor of the conditional vendee. Even had it not been recorded at all, it would have been superior to a subsequent lien created by law. *Mackler v. Lahman,*196 Ga. 535 (1) (27 S. E. 2d 35). “The registration and record of conditional bills of sale shall be gov*204erned in all respects by the laws relating to the registration of mortgages on personal property, except that any conditional bill of sale when filed for record within thirty days from its date, shall have priority from the date of its execution, as to all other liens and instruments and claims. The effect of failure to record a conditional bill of sale shall be the same as is the effect of failure to record a deed of bargain and sale.” Ga. L. 1957, pp. 167-8.

Decided February 13, 1961

Rehearing denied March 1, 1961.

*Sanders, Thurmond & Hester, Isaac S. Jolles,*for plaintiff in error.

*Claud R. Caldwell,*contra.

The court erred in not admitting the conditional-sale contract in evidence and in overruling the motion for a new trial.

*Judgment revmsed.*

*Felton, C. J., and Nichols, J., concur.*
DATE: December 27, 2011

TO: The Record -- Docket # EPA
- HQ
- RCRA
- 2008
- 0808 FROM: Elai ne Eby, Environmental Scientist, MRWMD, ORCR, EPA SUBJECT: Conversations with American Petroleum Institute and Gasification Technology

Council Regarding Use of the Petroleum Exclusion found at 40 CFR 261.4(a)(12)(i). On Tuesday, October 25, 2011, I contacted Derek D. Swick of the American Petroleum Institute and Robert Childress of the Gasification Technology Council. The purpose of this communication was to inquire as to whether they were aware of any petroleum refinery currently using the gasification exclusion for oil - bearing hazardous secondary materials found at 40 CFR 261.4(a) (12)(i). Mr. Swick answered that , in canvassing his members , he was unaware of anyone claiming to be using the exclusion. Mr. Childress referred me to Rob Childress , also of the Gasification Technology Council, who after some checking, responded that he was unaware of any petroleum refinery currently us ing the exclusion.
|   | 1. | I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Crimson Exploration Inc.; |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 4. | The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 5. | The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | August 5, 2010          |   |
|-------------|-------------------------|--------|
|        | /s/ E. Joseph Grady     |   |
| Name:       | E. Joseph Grady         |   |
| Title:      | Senior Vice President   |   |
|        | Chief Financial Officer |   |
**Exhibit31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I,Carl Mostert, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-Q of Altris Software, Inc.;

 

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date:August 14, 2003

 

 
| /s/  Carl Mostert        |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Carl  Mostert            |
| Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Balance
Sheet, Statement of Operations, Statements of Cash Flows and Notes thereto
incorporated in Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-QSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,400
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
38787.

#### CITY OF DACULA v. ALLEN.

Jordan, Judge.

Emory M. Allen was convicted in the Mayor’s Court of the City of Dacula of the offense of public drunkenness in violation of a city ordinance and was fined the sum of $150. His writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Gwinnett County was sustained and the exception is to that judgment and to the antecedent order of the superior court denying the city’s motion to dismiss the writ of certiorari *601on the ground that no valid bond had been filed by the defendant as required by law. *Held:*

Decided April 28, 1961.

*Joseph E. Cheeley,*for plaintiff in error.

*Merritt & Pruitt, Glyndon C. Pruitt,*contra.

Since it is well settled by numerous decisions of the Supreme Court and this court that neither the State nor any municipality has the authority in a criminal or quasi-criminal case to except to any sentence, judgment, or decision of the court, the motion to dismiss the writ of error must be sustained. *Cranston v. City of Augusta,*61 Ga. 572; *Mayor &c. of Hawkinsville v. Etheridge,*96 Ga, 326 (22 S. E. 985); *Mayor &c. of City of Macon v. Wood,*109 Ga. 149 (34 S. E. 322); *City of Valdosta v. Goodwin,*21 Ga. App. 664 (94 S. E. 812); *City of Manchester v. Rowe,*60 Ga. App. 567 (4 S. E. 2d 477); *City of Manchester v. Dunn,*38 Ga. App. 83 (142 S. E. 747); *City of Moultrie v. Csiki,*71 Ga. App. 13 (29 S. E. 2d 785); *City of Atlanta v. Stallings,*198 Ga. 510, 513 (32 S. E. 2d 256).

*Writ of*error *dismissed.*

*Townsend, P. J., Carlisle and Frankum, JJ., concur.*
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference, in the Registration
Statements (Forms S-8 No. 333-45669 and No. 333-47573) of our report dated March
3, 1999 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and additional
information of Esprit Telecom Group plc as of December 31, 1998, September 30,
1997 and September 30, 1996 and for each of the years then ended, included in
this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Global TeleSystems Group, Inc. for the year
ended December 31, 1998.
 
/s/  PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS
 
PricewaterhouseCoopers
 
London, England
March 18, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT AUGUST 31, 1999, THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS AT AUGUST 31, 1999 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOW
AT AUGUST 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                        15
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,418
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     10,121
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,938
<PP&E>                                         111,072
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 173,133
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,117
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,267
<OTHER-SE>                                      50,431
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   173,133
<SALES>                                        155,056
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               155,056
<CGS>                                          115,021
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  115,021
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,134
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,413
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,577
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,372
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,205
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,205
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.84)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.80)


</TABLE>