alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE v. AMANDA NELSON.1

December 14, 1923.

No. 23,655.

Conviction for keeping disorderly house sustained.

When charged with violation of municipal ordinance, defendant not entitled to jury trial; less proof required than in case of violation of criminal statute; and evidence clearly established defendant was keeper of disorderly house. [Reporter.]

Defendant was arraigned in the municipal court of Minneapolis, charged with keeping a disorderly house, tried before Reed, J., who denied her motions to dismiss and found her guilty of the offense charged. From the judgment rendered against her, defendant appealed.

Affirmed.

*Thomson*& *Williams,*for appellant.

*Neil M. Cronin,*City Attorney, and *Luther W. Youngdahl,*Assistant City Attorney, for respondent.

1

 Reported in 196 N. W. 279.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was convicted of running a disorderly house in the city of Minneapolis, contrary to an ordinance. She appeals. The errors assigned are: (a) The evidence did not prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt; and (b) the only evidence of defendant’s connection with the house was her admission that she ran it.

*507This being a quasi criminal prosecution under an ordinance, sections 8462 and 8463, G. S. 1913, are not applicable. In State v. Lee, 29 Minn. 445, 457, 13 N. W. 913, it was said of an ordinance against operating a house of ill-fame “this ordinance is satisfied with a less degree or quantity of evidence than is required on the trial of the offense under the general law, (which must be beyond reasonable doubt).” A defendant is not entitled to a jury trial when charged with an offense under a municipal ordinance. City of Mankato v. Arnold, 36 Minn. 62, 30 N. W. 305; State v. Harris, 50 Minn. 128, 52 N. W. 387, 531; State v. Grimes, 83 Minn. 460, 86 N. W. 449. In State v. Robitshek, 60 Minn. 123, 124, 61 N. W. 1023, 33 L. R. A. 33, it is said: “It has repeatedly been decided by this court, as it has elsewhere, that municipal ordinances are not criminal statutes; that violations thereof are not crimes, nor are such violations governed by the rules of the criminal law, save in certain specified exceptional particulars.” The evidence clearly established the house in question to have been a disorderly house. Its reputation was bad; it was frequented at all hours of the night by men and also women; drunken persons would issue therefrom; revelry and profanity were heard by passers on the street until the small hours of the morning; and when, after midnight, on the date the arrest was made, the officers entered, 5 persons were found drinking and carousing in one room, with defendant in an adjacent room, the door being open, lying on a bed, almost wholly undressed kicking, cursing and swearing in a maudlin way.

Defendant’s counsel seem to argue that there was no proof of the corpus delicti except by defendant’s admission. He is in error. The corpus delicti was the existence of a disorderly house. And, as to defendant being the one concerned in its operation, her admission, corroborated by the fact that she was found therein under the condition stated, was amply sufficient to support the conviction.

Judgment affirmed.
# EUR-Lex - 31988D0200 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31988D0200

**88/200/EEC: Commission Decision of 18 February 1988 approving the plan relating to the examination for hormone residues submitted by Belgium (Only the French and Dutch texts are authentic) **

*
Official Journal L 094 , 12/04/1988 P. 0026 - 0026 *

*****

COMMISSION DECISION

of 18 February 1988

approving the plan relating to the examination for hormone residues submitted by Belgium

(Only the French and Dutch texts are authentic)

(88/200/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 86/469/EEC of 16 September 1986 concerning examination for animals and fresh meat for the presence of residues (1), and in particular Article 4 thereof,

Whereas, by document of 5 June 1987, Belgium sent the Commission a plan setting out the national measures taken on the examination for residues of the substances referred to in Annex I (A), Groups I and II to Directive 86/469/EEC;

Whereas examination of this plan, as modified, has shown that it conforms to the provisions laid down in Directive 86/469/EEC, and in particular Article 4 (1) thereof;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The plan relating to the examination for residues of the substances referred to in Annex I (A), Groups I and II to Directive 86/469/EEC submitted by Belgium is hereby approved.

Article 2

Belgium shall adopt the necessary laws, regulations and administrative provisions for the implementation of the plan referred to in Article 1.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Belgium.

Done at Brussels, 18 February 1988.

For the Commission

Frans ANDRIESSEN

Vice-President

(1) OJ No L 275, 26. 9. 1986, p. 36.
### Ground water in the alluvium of Kings River Valley, Humboldt County, Nevada

By: C.P. Zones

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1619L

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
J

~~ (EO STqT

~ S UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY o ~~~~ Q WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 2 ~ llffl► 0 PROj

~ G

~ \ 2 

### NOV - 1 2

- 010

OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION Mr. William B. Mackie Acting Manager, National TRU Program Carlsbad Field Office U.S. Department of Energy P.O. Box 3090 Carlsbad, NM 88221-3090 Dear Mr. Mackie: On February 8, 2010, the Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) requested, as a Tier 1(T1) change, that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approve remote-handled (RH) transuranic (TRU) waste stream IN-ID-NRF-153 (Naval Reactors Facility) from the Idaho National Laboratory (INL). EPA has reviewed the information provided and approves the addition of these containers from waste stream IN-ID-NRF-I 53 and, as a result, INL may dispose of this waste at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). This approval also allows future addition of waste to this stream with a waste pedigree (radiological and physical contents) similar to the waste approved in this letter and as detailed in the report. The enclosed report (EPA Docket No. A-98-49; II-A4-135) supports EPA's approval decision based on the information reviewed. If you have any questions regarding this approval, please contact Rajani Joglekar at (202) 343-9462 or Ed Feltcorn at (202) 343-9422. Sincerely,

Tom Peake, Director Center for Waste Management and Regulations 

### Enclosure

Intemet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov

RecycledJRecyclable 9 Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Papercc: Electronic Distribution

Christine Gelles, DOE EM Alton Harris, DOE EM Ed Ziemianski, CBFO Ava Holland, CBFO QA J R Stroble, CBFO Courtland Fesmire, CBFO Martin Navarrete, CBFO QA Dennis Miehls, CBFO QA D K Ploetz, WTS-CCP Mike Sensibaugh, WTS-CCP Mark Pearcy, WTS-CCP Allison Pangle, CTAC Porf Martinez, CTAC Steve Zappe, NMED
§ 507.40 Monitoring. As appropriate to the nature of the preventive control and its role in the facility's food safety system you must: ( a ) Establish and implement written procedures, including the frequency with which they are to be performed, for monitoring the preventive controls; and
( b ) Monitor the preventive controls with adequate frequency to provide assurance that they are consistently performed.
( c ) ( 1 ) You must document the monitoring of preventive controls in accordance with this section in records that are subject to verification in accordance with § 507.45(a)(2) and records review in accordance with § 507.49(a)(4)(i);
( 2 ) ( i ) Records of refrigeration temperature during storage of animal food that requires time/temperature control to significantly minimize or prevent the growth of, or toxin production by, pathogens may be affirmative records demonstrating temperature is controlled or exception records demonstrating loss of temperature control; and
( ii ) Exception records may be adequate in circumstances other than monitoring of refrigeration temperature.
§ 26.76 Confidentiality. ( a ) Each party agrees to maintain, to the extent required under its laws, the confidentiality of information exchanged under this part.
( b ) In particular, neither party shall disclose to the public, nor permit a conformity assessment body (CAB) to disclose to the public, information exchanged under this part that constitutes trade secrets, confidential commercial or financial information, or information that relates to an ongoing investigation.
( c ) A party or a CAB may, upon exchanging information with the other party or with a CAB of the other party, designate the portions of the information that it considers to be exempt from disclosure.
( d ) Each party shall take all precautions reasonably necessary to protect information exchanged under this part from unauthorized disclosure.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9420-9421]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4032]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Drug Abuse; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.


[[Page 9421]]


    Name of Committee: National Institute on Drug Abuse Special 
Emphasis Panel Web-Enabled Cognitive/Neuropsychological Evaluation 
System (4411).
    Date: March 30, 2010.
    Time: 1:30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6101 Executive Boulevard, 
Rockville, MD 20852. (Telephone Conference Call.)
    Contact Person: Lyle Furr, Contract Review Specialist, Office of 
Extramural Affairs, National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, DHHS, 
Room 220, MSC 8401, 6101 Executive Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-
8401. (301) 435-1439. lf33c.nih.gov.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.279, Drug 
Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 19, 2010.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-4032 Filed 3-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 39 (Monday, March 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 9202]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4092]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 1354-081]


Pacific Gas & Electric Company; Notice of Availability of Final 
Environmental Assessment

February 19, 2010.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 
as amended, and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) 
regulations (18 CFR Part 380), Commission staff has prepared a Final 
Environmental Assessment (FEA) regarding Pacific Gas & Electric 
Company's (PG&E) proposal to perform seismic remediation work at Crane 
Valley Dam, part of the Crane Valley Hydroelectric Project. The project 
occupies approximately 738 acres of federal lands within Sierra 
National Forest, approximately 40 miles northeast of the city of Fresno 
in Modesto County, California. Crane Valley Dam is located on North 
Fork Willow Creek, in the San Joaquin River Basin. The FEA analyzes the 
environmental effects of the seismic remediation proposal, PG&E's 
resource protection and mitigation plans, and recommends further 
measures to minimize any environmental effects. The FEA concludes that 
the proposed seismic remediation and resource plans, with the 
recommended measures, would not constitute a major federal action 
significantly affecting the quality of the human environment.
    A copy of the FEA is available for review at the Commission's 
Public Reference Room, or it may be viewed on the Commission's Web site 
at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket 
number (P-1354) in the docket number field to access the document. For 
assistance, call (202) 502-8222, or (202) 502-8659 (for TTY).
    For further information on this notice, please contact B. Peter 
Yarrington at (202) 502-6129.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-4092 Filed 2-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
<PAGE>   1
               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" in the
Registration Statement (Form S-3) and related Prospectus of InControl, Inc. for
the registration of 4,733,142 shares of its common stock and to the
incorporation by reference therein of our report dated January 29, 1998, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements of InControl, Inc. included in
its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1997, filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.

                                             ERNST & YOUNG LLP



Seattle, Washington
May 19, 1998
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of General Medical Sciences Special Emphasis Panel; Review of Minority Biomedical Research Support Chemistry Applications.                    

*Date:*                         March 18-19, 2010.                    

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.                     

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Hyatt Regency, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         John J. Laffan, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health,Natcher Building, Room 3AN18J, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-2773,                         *laffanjo@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, Special Minority Initiatives, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 19, 2010.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-3922 Filed 2-25-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
§ 26.73 Joint Committee. ( a ) A Joint Committee consisting of representatives of the United States and the European Community (EC) will be established. The Joint Committee shall be responsible for the effective functioning of the “Agreement on Mutual Recognition Between the United States of America and the European Community,” from which this part is derived.
( b ) The Joint Committee may establish Joint Sectoral Committees comprised of appropriate regulatory authorities and others deemed necessary.
( c ) The United States and the EC shall each have one vote in the Joint Committee. The Joint Committee shall make its decisions by unanimous consent. The Joint Committee shall determine its own rules and procedures.
( d ) The Joint Committee may consider any matter relating to the effective functioning of that agreement. In particular it shall be responsible for: ( 1 ) Listing, suspension, withdrawal and verification of conformity assessment bodies (CAB's) in accordance with that agreement;
( 2 ) Amending transitional arrangements in the sectoral annexes to that agreement;
( 3 ) Resolving any questions relating to the application of that agreement not otherwise resolved in the respective Joint Sectoral Committees;
( 4 ) Providing a forum for discussion of issues that may arise concerning the implementation of that agreement;
( 5 ) Considering ways to enhance the operation of that agreement;
( 6 ) Coordinating the negotiation of additional sectoral annexes to that agreement; and
( 7 ) Considering whether to amend that agreement in accordance with § 26.80.
( e ) When a party introduces new or additional conformity assessment procedures affecting a sectoral annex to that agreement, the parties shall discuss the matter in the Joint Committee with a view to bringing such new or additional procedures within the scope of that agreement and the relevant sectoral annex.
p110226.en1

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 11-0226

Post-Focus Draft Revision 1 6/24/2013

ENGINEER: Macek \ BCS \ JAS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 1

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 9
p110226.en1

 

SAT (concerns) (03/05/2011):

Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info:

Ecotox: 

Migration to groundwater: Negligible

PBT rating: P1B1T2 .

Health: 2-3 Dermal, Drinking Water, Inhalation

Eco: 1 No releases to Water (CoC = 1000 ppb)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1-2C

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. 

 

Page 2

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 9
EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 9
p110226.en1

standard 3% model is more conservative. Per the amendment,

 the drums will be cleaned with water and the water

disposed by incineration or deep-well injection. CEB

assumes incineration or deepwell injection assuming

compliance with proposed consent order.

RELEASE TOTAL

6.3E+2 kg/yr - all sites

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 11-0226

USE1: 

Number of Sites/ Location: 10

unknown site(s)

Days/yr: 50

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below

may coincide with daily releases from the other sources

to the same medium. Due to the small amount of PMN

residual PMN present after polymerization, CEB uses the

submission estimates for releases as a basis for all

releases subsequent to polymerization.

Incineration

Output 2: 3.0E-3 kg/site-day over 50 days/yr from 10 sites

or 1.5E+0 kg/yr

Page 4

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 9
p110226.en1

Incineration

Output 1: 8.0E-4 kg/site-day over 50 days/yr from 10 sites

or 4.0E-1 kg/yr

Output 2: 4.0E-3 kg/site-day over 50 days/yr from 10 sites

or 2.0E+0 kg/yr

 

 

Other

High End: 1.2E-3 kg/site-day over 50 days/yr from 10 sites

or 6.0E-1 kg/yr

RELEASE TOTAL

4.1E+0 kg/yr - all sites

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Page 5

EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 9
EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 9
p110226.en1

 

RELEASE TOTAL

6.3E+2 kg/yr - all sites

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 11-0226

USE2: Water-Soluble Polymer for Hair Cosmetics

Number of Sites/ Location: 10

unknown site(s)

Days/yr: 50

Page 7

EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 9
EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 9
p110226.en1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 9

EPA SANITIZED Page 9 of 9