alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 1230.12 Manufacturer; distributor.

If the name on the label or sticker is other than that of the manufacturer, it shall be qualified by such words as “packed for,” “packed by,” “sold by,” or “distributed by,” as the case may be, or by other appropriate expression.
SERVED: July 8, 2015 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT A TIONR E c E I v ED 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS . 

W ASHlNGTON, DC 

JN THE MATTER OF 

FISHER SCIENTIFIC COMPANY, LLC 

Docket No. FAA-2015- 1321 

JUL - 8 2015 

HEARING DOCKET 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR FAA TO RESPOND 

TO RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS 

The Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter "FAA'') tiled a Motion for Extension 

of Time to respond to Fisher Scientific Company, LLC's (hereinafter "Fisher") 

"MOTIONS TO DISMISS COMPLAINT FOR INSUFFICIENCY AND FOR 

COMPLAINANT'S VIOLATION OF RULE 208" (hereinafter "Motion.'). Fisher has 

not yet responded. 

We do not anticipate reaching this case until on or after mid-December 20I5. 

WHEREFORE. it be and is hereby ORDERED the FAA file a response to 

Fisher's Motion on or before August 7, 2015. 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment- Service List 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1 

ONE COPY 

Jeny W. Cox, Re.1pondent 's Counsel 

Counsel for Thermo Fisher Scientitlc, Inc. 

and Fisher Scientific Co .. LLC 

2729 Gallows Rd., Suite 401 

Vietma, VA 22180 

TEL: 703-757-5866 

Email: jcox@potomacstrategyassociates.com 

William Vines, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel, AS0-7 

Southern Region 

1701 Columbia A venue 

College Park, GA 30337 

TEL: 404-305-5200 

FAX: 404-305-5223 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

O!Iice of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-31 0) 

Washington. DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. FAA-2015-1321 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration. 600 Independence Avenue. S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-- Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, 

DC 20591: Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

2
[No. 40175-1-I.

Division One.

December 1, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Gerald Lee Whiteman, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 96-1-01988-1, Linda C. Krese, J., entered February 6, 1997. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
§ 520.1326a Mebendazole and trichlorfon powder. ( a ) *Specifications.* Each gram of powder contains 83.3 milligrams of mebendazole and 375.0 milligrams of trichlorofon.
( b ) *Sponsor.* See No. 000061 in § 510.600(c) of this chapter.
( c ) *Conditions of use in horses* — ( 1 ) *Amount.* 8.8 milligrams of mebendazole and 40 milligrams of trichlorofon per kilogram of body weight.
( 2 ) *Indications for use.* It is used in horses for the treatment of infections of bots (*Gastrophilus intestinalis* and *G. nasalis*), large roundworms (*Parascaris equorum*), large strongyles (*Strongylus edentatus, S. equinus, S. vulgaris*), small strongyles, and pinworms (*Oxyuris equi.*)
( 3 ) *Limitations.* Do not use in horses intended for human consumption. Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian.
[45 FR 10759, Feb. 19, 1980, as amended at 46 FR 52330, Oct. 27, 1981. Redesignated at 51 FR 13212, Apr. 18, 1986, as amended at 62 FR 61625, Nov. 19, 1997; 78 FR 28824, May 20, 2014]
[No. 38232-2-I.

Division One.

December 8, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Charles Fife, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for What-com County, No. 94-1-00676-5, Michael F. Moynihan, J., entered February 8, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
02/07/201 1 11:0 : 202267507 5 OFFIC E O F RULEMAKIN G PAG E 0 8

T1-856-397-954 1 FROWTH E DFS KO F 

### ROBERTT . HOBA N Rl-infiAMJR(g)YAHQO.CO M

Januar y 17 , 201 1 Frederic k 'lUton . M D F'-'UTH IAviario nAdminisiraiio n iJrup ; AlKiirmrn t

Divisio n AAM-800 , Ko.TT

n80 6 (JO O Indrpfrnririicc . Ave . S-W . Washmgion , D C 2050 1 Dea r Sir . \Vr , OAtalys t

Aviation , TJ..C ' 0 0 Fostcnow nRoa dPO . Btj x 160 0 Medfoid , N JOfiO^Cy , CCT lifica^r no . H4-1'A020 Y(TJO A#t o b e determined) . Rpqut-fit l u appl y for agrnj u o f i*^c.rn|j tio nfm mTitl e H , Pa n120 . T o f>rrrni i \is , operatin g undr r srris!i.iv» : pwrt s o f

th e rcijula tions. . T o rove r

«,ii.i r saXcTy-rcnsidv

p rmpIoyecM unde r

on e drup ; an dfll<:t>hnl hcstin g pro gram .

^....fiinrrrcHi . yo

u rs , Rober t T . Hoba n l?in*r.ir»r f.i f Opcrarion s tiatalys i Aviwuon , LLC .

C ATALYS TAVIATION , LL C P.O . BO X160 8 MEDFORD , N J 0805 5

CATALYSTAVIATI0N.CO M 509-668-001 302/07/201 1 11:0 2 202267507 5 OFFIC E O F RULEMAKING PAG E 0 9



# Professiona l Ai r

Charte r Services , Inc Dru g Abatemen t —AMP P Consortiu m 7287 7 McGee Stree t 876-942-214 4 Kansa s City , M

O 6414 5 800-424-214 4 Fa x816-943-946 4 www.pacsdrug.co m Januai y 17 , 201 1 Catalys t Aviation , LLC Attn : Rober t

Hoba n P O Bo x 160 8 Medford , N J0805 5 Dea r Mr . Hobein : Thi s lette r

i s t o advis e yo u tha t

Catalys t

Aviation , LL C wa s accepte d fo r meiubershi p b y th e Professiona l Ai r Charte r Services , Inc. , Dru g Abatemen t

/ AMPPConsortiu meffectiv e Januar y 23 , 2008 . W e appreciat e you r

confidenc e i nselectin g u s fo r yoio r anti-dru g an dalcoho l complianc e services . A s o f today , you r

compan y an dit s covere d employee s ar e covere dunde r th e drug/alcolio l regulation s o f FARPar t 120 , 121 , 91 , an d13 5 b y thi s Consortium . Yo u ma y forwar dthi s lette r t o you r FSD O & POI , o r

t o you r customers , a s proo f

o f you r complianc e wit hth e regulations . You r complianc e certificatio nwil l appea r i nSectio n Ao f you r Operation s Specifications . I f yo u hav e an y questions , problems - o r comment s regardin g dru g compliarice , pleas e cal l anj'time , Yojaxj^Qei^tJer^hip entitle s yo u t o unlimite dfre e consultatio na t Sincere ] Joh nCarpen i Progra mManage r
[No. 20663-3-II.

Division Two.

December 5, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Michael William Burkett, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 95-1-04889-9, Arthur W. Verharen, J., entered March 28, 1996. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Bridgewater, A.C.J., concurred in by Morgan and Armstrong, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Southwall Technologies Inc. (the “Company”), for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mallorie Burak, the Principal Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) that:
 
 1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date:    November 12, 2010
By:
/s/ Mallorie BurakMallorie BurakVice President and Chief Accounting Officer
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 09325

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name Description

09325\0932_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 09325\09325_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

09325\09325_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

x 09325\09325_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09325\09325_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09325\09325_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09325\09325_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09325\09325_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

09325\Certification Statement Plant ID 09325.pdf Plant certification statement

x 09325\Follow up\AEP MR 09325 Part C Sec 3.2 Table C-23 update.xls Draft Questions for Follow Up

x 09325\Follow up\EPA MR ICR review ques.doc Draft Questions for Follow Up

x 09325\Follow up\Steam Electric Questionnaire Follow Up Questions for Muskingum River.rtf Draft Questions for Follow Up

09325\Supplemental Documents\09325_AEP ELGs ICR submittal letter 10-13-10.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

09325\Supplemental Documents\09325_AEP MR 09325 A5-2 Plant Outer Bndy.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09325\Supplemental Documents\09325_AEP MR 09325 A5-3 WB-1 Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09325\Supplemental Documents\09325_AEP MR 09325 D2-3 EPRI Rprt 1020365 CBI.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09325\Supplemental Documents\09325_AEP MR 09325 D2-3 FGD WW Study Excerpt CBI.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09325\Supplemental Documents\09325_AEP MR 09325 D2-3 FGD WW Study Sec 5 CBI.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09325\Supplemental Documents\09325_AEP MR 09325 D2-3 FGD WW Study Tier 2 CBI.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09325\Supplemental Documents\09325_AEP MR 09325 D-3 POND-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09325\Supplemental Documents\09325_AEP MR 09325 D-3 POND-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09325\Supplemental Documents\09325_AEP MR 09325 D-3 POND-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

GARY LANE EISENMANN, Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 22-0514 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

Nos. CR2012-009381-001, CR2014-001133-001

The Honorable Kathleen H. Mead, Judge (Retired)

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Phoenix

By Daniel Strange

Counsel for Respondent

Gary Lane Eisenmann, Eloy

Petitioner

FILED 5-11-2023
STATE v. EISENMANN

Decision of the Court

2

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge Jennifer M. Perkins, Judge Angela K. Paton, and Judge D. 

Steven Williams delivered the decision of the Court.

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Petitioner Gary Lane Eisenmann seeks review of the superior 

court’s order dismissing his petition for post-conviction relief, filed 

pursuant to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is his first 

petition.

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will 

not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief. 

State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner’s burden to 

show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition 

for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, 538, ¶ 1 (App. 

2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, as well as the 

superior court’s order dismissing the petition for post-conviction, the 

petition, response, reply, and additional related filings. Petitioner has not 

established an abuse of discretion.

¶4 For the foregoing reasons, we grant review but deny relief.
TS-ACET10/20/30/40/50

Attachment #9 

Pt. 2, Sec. B 

Additional Information on the Absence of Tank Truck Cleaning Operations
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                          NEXTLINK COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

NEXTLINK Communications, Inc.                      Jurisdiction of Organization
-----------------------------                      ----------------------------
<S>                                                 <C>
ITC, Inc.                                                 Utah
d/b/a NEXTLINK Affinity

NEXTLINK California, L.L.C.                               Washington

NEXTLINK Capital, Inc.                                    Washington

NEXTLINK Georgia, Inc.                                    Washington

NEXTLINK Illinois, Inc.                                   Washington

NEXTLINK Interactive, L.L.C.                              Washington

NEXTLINK Kansas, L.L.C.                                   Washington

NEXTLINK Leasing of Utah, L.L.C.                          Washington

NEXTLINK Management Services, L.L.C.                      Washington

NEXTLINK Mindshare, L.L.C.                                Washington

NEXTLINK New Jersey, L.L.C.                               Washington

NEXTLINK New York, L.L.C.                                 Washington

NEXTLINK Ohio, L.L.C.                                     Washington

NEXTLINK Pennsylvania, L.P.                               Washington

NEXTLINK Pennsylvania Merger Company II                   Washington

NEXTLINK Solutions, L.L.C.                                Washington

NEXTLINK Tennessee, L.L.C.                                Washington

NEXTLINK Utah, L.L.C.                                     Washington

NEXTLINK Washington, L.L.C.                               Washington

Telecommunications of Nevada, L.L.C. (40% interest)       Delaware
</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 1 (Monday, January 4, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 139-140]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-33058]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Agency Information Collection Activities: Requests for Comments; 
Clearance of Renewed Approval of Information Collection: Airport Grant 
Program

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA 
invites public comments about our intention to request the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) approval to revise a currently approved 
information collection. The FAA is developing an information system to 
collect certain frequency information currently being collected on form 
7460-1, and to revise form 7460-1 to remove frequency information 
requests.

DATES: Written comments should be submitted by March 4, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to the FAA at the following address: Ronda 
Thompson, Room 441, Federal Aviation Administration, ASP-110, 950 
L'Enfant Plaza SW., Washington, DC 20024.
    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of 
this information collection, including (a) Whether the proposed 
collection of information is necessary for FAA's performance; (b) the 
accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA to enhance the 
quality, utility and clarity of the information collection; and (d) 
ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the quality of 
the collected information. The agency will summarize and/or include 
your comments in the request for OMB's clearance of this information 
collection.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ronda Thompson at (202) 267-1416, or 
by email at: Ronda.Thompson@faa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    OMB Control Number: 2120-0001.

[[Page 140]]

    Title: Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration, Notice of 
Actual Construction or Alteration, Project Status Report.
    Form Numbers: FAA Form 7460-1.
    Type of Review: Revision of an information collection.
    Background: 49 U.S.C. Section 44718 states that the Secretary of 
Transportation shall require notice of structures that may affect 
navigable airspace, air commerce, or air capacity. These notice 
requirements are contained in 14 CFR part 77. The frequency information 
is currently collected via FAA forms 7460-1.
    Respondents: Approximately 2400 annually.
    Frequency: Information is collected on occasion.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: .2 hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 480 hours.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on December 23, 2015.
Ronda Thompson,
FAA Information Collection Clearance Officer, Performance, Policy, and 
Records Management Branch, ASP-110.
[FR Doc. 2015-33058 Filed 12-31-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
38620.

#### SOUTHERN WIRE & IRON, INC. v. AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY.

Decided March 7, 1961.

*268*John L. Westmoreland, John L. Westmoreland, Jr., Harry P. Hall, Jr., M. K. Pentecost, Jr.,*for plaintiff in error.

*Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Murphy, A. A. Baumstark, James K. Rankin,*contra.

Nichols, Judge.

1. The defendant relies on the case of *Parker Heating Co. v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.,*102 Ga. App. 27 (115 S. E. 2d 410), to support its contention that the exhibit attached to the petition wa's insufficient and that its demurrers pointing out such defects should have been sustained. In that case there was no allegation as to items of merchandise or services sold, nor did the exhibit attached to the petition disclose such information and the defendant was not apprized of the nature of the claim against him so as to enable him to prepare his defense, nor was the pleader, under the allegations, confined to a particular cause of action. See also *Kilgore v. Gulf Oil Corp.,*102 Ga. App. 619 (117 S. E. 2d 199), where it was held that, in an action on an open account by an oil company the bill of particulars merely set forth monthly totals of “petroleum products, services and auto accessories,” such bill of particulars was insufficient to confine the plaintiff to a particular cause of action and fairly apprize the defendant of the character of the claim against him. Such is not the case here, for the bill of particulars in the present case confined the plaintiff to a recovery on specified insurance policies, and the information given did apprize the defendant of the *269claim against it. In *Henry Darling, Inc. v. Harvey-Given Co.,*40 Ga. App. 771 (2) (151 S. E. 518), also- a case on open account for insurance premiums, it was held that a bill of particulars in greater detail than the one in the case sub judice was sufficient as against demurrer, but it was not held in that case that all the information therein alleged was necessary in order to withstand special demurrer. It was there said: “In a suit upon an account, a bill of particulars should be attached to the petition; in other words, the account should be itemized, although unnecessarily minute and detailed statements are not required. In this respect the petition will be sufficient if it plainly, fully, and distinctly sets forth the ground of complaint or cause of action relied on. In the instant case the petition was not subject to special demurrer because the account sued on was not sufficiently itemized.”

The bill of particulars in the case sub judice was sufficient and the defendant’s special demurrers thereto were properly overruled, and the general demurrer, based on the special demurrers being sustained, was properly overruled.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Felton, C. J., and Bell, J., concur.*
§ 26.47 Role and composition of the Joint Sectoral Committee. ( a ) The Joint Sectoral Committee for this subpart is set up to monitor the activities under both the transitional and operational phases of this subpart.
( b ) The Joint Sectoral Committee will be cochaired by a representative of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the United States and a representative of the European Community (EC) who will each have one vote. Decisions will be taken by unanimous consent.
( c ) The Joint Sectoral Committee's functions will include: ( 1 ) Making a joint assessment of the equivalence of conformity assessment bodies (CAB's);
( 2 ) Developing and maintaining the list of equivalent CAB's, including any limitation in terms of their scope of activities and communicating the list to all authorities and the Joint Committee described in subpart C of this part;
( 3 ) Providing a forum to discuss issues relating to this subpart, including concerns that a CAB may no longer be equivalent and opportunity to review product coverage; and
( 4 ) Consideration of the issue of suspension.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          11,394
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 251,036
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           48,707
<BONDS>                                        133,382
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        28,306
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,370
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   251,036
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                65,266
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,679
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 5,249
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,752
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,228
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,442
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,786
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,786
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.00
        

</TABLE>