alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                       [THE LOEWEN GROUP INC. LETTERHEAD]


(NYSE, TSE, ME: LWN)
      NEWS

Contact:
Thomas C. Franco
Broadgate Consultants, Inc.
Tel: (212) 232-2222


                              FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE



                  LOEWEN GROUP ANNOUNCES CEMETERY ASSET SALE TO
                                 INVESTOR GROUP



                          FOURTH QUARTER RESULTS UPDATE

                    _________________________________________


VANCOUVER, BC, March 1, 1999 -- The Loewen Group (NYSE, TSE, MSE: LWN) announced
today a definitive agreement to sell certain cemetery properties to an investor
group led by McCown De Leeuw & Co., a private investment firm specializing in
buying and building middle market companies in partnership with management. The
transaction is valued at approximately $193 million.

Commenting on today's announcement, John S. Lacey, Chairman of the Board said:
"Loewen is embarked on a two-pronged strategy to maximize shareholder value.
First, we are taking steps to improve profitability and reduce negative cash
flow from operations. The second initiative, which is reflected in today's
announcement, includes selective asset sales to reduce debt. Loewen continues
discussions with other interested parties concerning additional asset sales."

<PAGE>   2

The transaction includes 124 cemetery properties in Connecticut, Delaware,
Maryland, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Virginia and West Virginia, as
well as three funeral homes located on cemeteries involved in the sale. The
transaction, which is subject to certain closing conditions, is expected to
close by April. In addition to McCown De Leeuw & Co., the investor group
includes former Loewen executives Lawrence Miller and William R. Shane.

In addition, Loewen announced that it expects to report its fourth quarter and
full-year 1998 financial results in late March. Based on preliminary
information, Loewen expects to report an operating loss for the quarter. The
Company also said it expects to incur substantial charges related to the
strategic process, the closing of the Philadelphia accounting office, this asset
sale and continued examination of the Company's assets in light of its current
operating and asset reduction strategies.



The Company also noted that its effective tax rate on operating earnings may
increase in 1999 and will likely further increase in 2000 and later years due to
the cessation of the Company's acquisition program, recent operating results and
the effect of any asset sales.

The Loewen Group Inc. is the second largest funeral home and cemetery operator
in North America. The Company employs approximately 16,000 people and owns or
operates more than 1,100 funeral homes and over 500 cemeteries across the United
States, Canada and the United Kingdom. Over 90 percent of the Company's revenue
is derived from the United States.

The Loewen Group's website is located at http://www.loewengroup.com

                                            # # #
### Chemical quality of surface water in the Allegheny River basin, Pennsylvania and New York

By: Edward F. McCarren

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1835

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN FORM 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       6,250,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,552,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (132,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  4,309,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,205,000
<PP&E>                                       3,019,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,627,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,987,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,079,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    19,366,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,458,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,987,000
<SALES>                                     12,243,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,243,000
<CGS>                                        5,414,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,093,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (119,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,855,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,855,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,855,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .32
        

</TABLE>
This document is in the public domain and may be freely copied or reprinted. 

Disclaimer 

Mention of any company or product does not constitute endorsement by the National Institute 

for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). In addition, citations to websites external 

to NIOSH do not constitute NIOSH endorsement of the sponsoring organizations or their 

programs or products. Furthermore, NIOSH is not responsible for the content of these websites. 

All Web addresses referenced in this document were accessible as of the publication date. 

Acknowledgements 

Nick Thorkelson (Developer/Illustrator); residential builders and subcontractors in Arizona, 

Colorado, Kentucky, Missouri and Texas who permitted NIOSH access to residential building 

sites; and residential building subcontractors, safety specialists and workers who participated 

in NIOSH sponsored focus groups in Arizona, Illinois, Texas, West Virginia and Washington. 

Background Information 

The information in this publication is based on NIOSH supported research; Nail Gun Safety: 

A Guide for Construction Contractors (NIOSH Publication No. 2011–202/OSHA Publication 

No. 3459–8–11); and focus group discussions with residential building subcontractors, safety 

specialists and workers. 

New nail gun users must receive safety training, not just a copy of this publication. Safety training 

requirements are described in detail in Nail Gun Safety: A Guide for Construction Contractors 

and can be viewed and printed or downloaded from www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2011-202/. 

More information about OSHA power tool regulations mentioned on pages 4–5 can be found 

in Hand and Power Tools, OSHA Publication No. 3080 2002 (Revised) www.osha.gov/ 

Publications/osha3080.pdf. 

DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2013–149 

May 2013 

Safer • Healthier • PeopleTM 









Delivering
on
the
Nation’s
promise:



Safety
and
health
at
work
for
all
people



through
research
and
prevention



To
receive
NIOSH
documents
or
more
information
about
occupational


safety
and
health
topics,
contact
NIOSH
at


1–800–CDC–INFO
(1–800–232–4636)


TTY:
1–888–232–6348


CDC
iNFO:
www.cdc.gov/info


or
visit
the
NIOSH
Web
site
at
www.cdc.gov/niosh 

For
a
monthly
update
on
news
at
NIOSH,
subscribe
to
NIOSH eNews 

by
visiting
www.cdc.gov/niosh/eNews.


DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2013–149 

safer • healthier • peopletm 

DEPARTMENT OF HEATLH AND HUMAN SERVICES 

Centers
for
Disease
Control
and
Prevention



National
Institute
for
Occupational
Safety
and
Health
SCWC-18-0000294 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

STATE OF HAWAI # I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs. ARNET D. PERSONS, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-18-0000294; CASE NO. 1DCW-17-0002602) ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Rec ktenwald, C.J., Na kayama, McKenna, P ollack, a nd Wilson , JJ.) Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Arnet D. Persons’ application for writ of certiorari, filed on July 24, 2019, is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, August 26, 2019, /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-18-0000294 26-AUG-2019 09:02 AM
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of Southwall Technologies Inc. (the "Company"), for the quarter ended March
28, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas G. Hood, the Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.







| | May 17, 2004 | By: | /s/ Thomas G. Hood                       
| | ------------ | --- | -----------------------------------------
| |              |     | Thomas G. Hood
   Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

In accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K, this certification is being
"furnished" as Exhibit 32.1 to the Company's quarterly report and shall not be
deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the "Exchange Act") or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section,
nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as expressly set forth by
specific reference in such a filing.

---
[No. 38735-9-I.

Division One.

November 24, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Burnette Anthony Saloy, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 96-1-01046-1, Donald D. Haley, J., entered June 5, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Exhibit








Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the reference to our firm under the captions “Services - Experts” and “Services - Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Statement of Additional Information and to the use of our reports: (1) dated April 27, 2017 with respect to the financial statements of Symetra Separate Account C and (2) dated April 6, 2017, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Symetra Life Insurance Company, in Post-Effective Amendment No. 35 to the Registration Statement (Form N-4, No. 33-69712) of Symetra Separate Account C and related prospectus of the Spinnaker Variable Annuity filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 27, 2017.


                    
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
                    
Seattle, Washington
April 27, 2017
[No. 19954-8-II.

Division Two.

November 7, 1997.]

#### Elizabeth Petcu, *Respondent,*v. Michael Petcu, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Mason County, No. 91-3-00114-3, Toni A. Sheldon, J., entered August 23,1995. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Bridgewater, A.C.J., concurred in by Armstrong and Hunt, JJ.
[Nos. 15431-9-III; 15681-8-III.

Division Three.

December 4, 1997.]

#### John Naddy, et al., *Appellants,*v. Piper Jaffray, Incorporated, *Respondent.*

Appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court for Spokane County, No. 95-2-05882-0, Michael E. Donohue and Robert D. Austin, JJ., entered December 29, 1995 and March 22, 1996. *Affirmed in part, reversed in part*and *remanded*by unpublished opinion per Brown, J., concurred in by Schultheis, A.C.J., and Kurtz, J.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:**Modernizinglearning: building the future learning ecosystem
 
PDF |EPUB |
 
SuDoc Number:D 1.2:L 47
Item Number:0306 (online)
System Number: 001098291
July 16, 2019
#### § 26.13 Transmission of postapproval inspection reports.

Postapproval good manufacturing practice (GMP) inspection reports concerning products covered by this subpart will be transmitted to the authority of the importing country within 60-calendar days of the request. Should a new inspection be needed, the inspection report will be transmitted within 90-calendar days of the request.
<TABLE>
<S>                                 <C>         <C>         <C>          <C>
(in 000's, except per share amounts)

                                     Three Months Ended       Nine Months Ended 
                                    ________    _________   _________   __________

                                     Oct. 3,    Sept. 27,    Oct. 3,     Sept. 27,
                                      1998        1997        1998         1997 
                                    ________    _________   _________   _________

Weighted average shares outstanding   48,040      46,947      47,649      47,752

Effect of dilutive securities          1,547       1,346       1,608       1,399 
                                    ________    _________   _________   _________


Shares for diluted EPS                49,587      48,293      49,257      49,151
                                    =========   =========   =========   =========


Income from continuing operations   $ 28,109    $ 20,080    $ 71,556     $ 51,841  
                                    =========   =========   =========   =========


Per share amounts:

  Basic                             $   0.59    $   0.43    $   1.50    $   1.09
                                    =========   =========   =========   =========


  Diluted                           $   0.57    $   0.42    $   1.45    $   1.05
                                    =========   =========   =========   =========

</TABLE>
#### CHAS. W. EDDY & COMPANY v. IVERN B. HINCHMAN.1

December 21, 1923.

No. 23,637.

Finding for real estate broker sustained.

1. The finding that plaintiff, a real estate broker, procured a purchaser for defendant’s homestead is supported by the evidence.

*403Wife’s refusal to sign contract for homestead not a defense.

2. . The refusal of defendant’s wife to execute the contract of sale was not a defense to an action to recover for services rendered in procuring the purchaser.

Evidence of plaintiff’s knowledge.

3. The evidence did not show conclusively that plaintiff knew that defendant’s wife would not join in the sale of the family homestead.

Action in the municipal court of St. Paul to recover $200 for services as real estate broker. The case was tried before Conrad Olson, J., who ordered judgment in favor of plaintiff. From the judgment entered pursuant to the order for judgment, defendant appealed.

Affirmed.

*Yaldemar Hansen,*for appellant.

*Harry 8. Locke,*for respondent.

1

 Reported in 196 N. W. 479.

Lees, C.

Action by a real estate broker to recover for services rendered in procuring a purchaser for defendant’s homestead. The action was defended on two grounds: (1) That plaintiff did not procure the purchaser; and (2) that the sale fell through because defendant’s wife refused to sign the contract with the purchaser. The court found in plaintiff’s favor and defendant has appealed from the judgment.

Plaintiff testified that defendant employed him to sell the property; that he communicated with the purchaser; that a few days later defendant called him to his home; that the defendant, his wife and the prospective purchaser were present; that he conducted the negotiations between the parties, and, as a result, terms of sale were agreed upon and embodied in a contract prepared by plaintiff and executed by the purchaser and the defendant, but not by defendant’s wife. Defendant introduced contradictory evidence. The trial court accepted plaintiff’s version of the transaction, and the finding that plaintiff procured the purchaser must be sustained.

The rule that a contract for the sale of the family homestead is void unless it is signed by both the husband and the wife has no *404application to this case. Plaintiff is seeking to compel defendant to pay him the reasonable value of services rendered in finding a purchaser for defendant’s homestead and negotiating a sale thereof. His cause of action is not based on the void contract between defendant and the purchaser. The refusal of defendant’s wife to execute the contract is not a defense. Marlin v. Sipprell, 98 Minn. 271, 101 N. W. 169. Note L. R. A. 1915E, 718.

The evidence was not conclusive that plaintiff knew that defendant’s wife would refuse to join in the sale. Not only was she present when the negotiations with the purchaser were had, but there is evidence that she asked plaintiff to come to the house and act as her agent.

Judgment affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1915

MAGDA M. ZIDAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

STATE OF MARYLAND, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND 

CORRECTIONAL SERVICES,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Susan K. Gauvey, Magistrate Judge. 

(1:10-cv-01792-SKG)

Submitted: November 20, 2012 Decided: November 26, 2012

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit 

Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Magda M. Zidan, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa O’Mara Arnquist, OFFICE 

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Pikesville, Maryland; 

Michael O’Connor Doyle, Assistant Attorney General, Diane 

Carroll Bustos, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, 

Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Magda M. Zidan appeals from the magistrate judge’s 

order* granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant in her 

employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record 

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to 

proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by 

the magistrate judge. Zidan v. Maryland, No. 1:10-cv-01792-SKG 

(D. Md. July 17, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 * The parties consented to the exercise of jurisdiction by 

the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2006).
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A20A0861. RUFARO SMITH v. THE STATE.

Rufaro Smith was convicted of armed robbery, aggravated assault, and

possession of a knife during the commission of a felony. Smith filed a motion for new

trial, which the trial court denied, and this Court affirmed his conviction on appeal

in an unpublished opinion. See Case No. A16A0833 (affirmed June 8, 2016). Smith

subsequently filed an extraordinary motion for new trial, which the trial court denied.

Smith then filed this direct appeal. We lack jurisdiction.

 An order denying an extraordinary motion for new trial must be appealed by

application for discretionary appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (7); Balkcom v. State,

227 Ga. App. 327, 329 (489 SE2d 129) (1997). Smith’sfailure to follow the requisite

appellate procedure deprives us of jurisdiction to consider this appeal, which is

hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

January 13, 2020

01/13/2020
[No. 15682-6-III.

Division Three.

November 20, 1997.]

#### *In the Matter of the Custody of*Jennifer A., Darlene Bergeron, *Respondent,*Vicki Kirk, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Lincoln County, No. 94-3-01573-1, Wallis W. Friel, J., entered March 19, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Zagelow, J. Pro Tern., concurred in by Kurtz and Brown, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Systemax Inc., hereby certifies that Systemax Inc.’s Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 (o)(d)) and that the information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Systemax Inc.





Dated: March 17, 2011/s/ LAWRENCE P. REINHOLDLawrence P. Reinhold, Chief Financial Officer