alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
BALANCE SHEET, STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS, STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS AND NOTES
THERETO INCORPORATED IN PART I, ITEM 7 OF THIS FORM 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-30-1999
<CASH>                                         180,499
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,384
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               229,780
<PP&E>                                         686,662
<DEPRECIATION>                                 121,923
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 939,681
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          991,843
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    150,766
<COMMON>                                        11,231
<OTHER-SE>                                   (214,159)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   939,681
<SALES>                                         47,956
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                47,956
<CGS>                                           52,721
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  581,137
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,375
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,627
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (589,277)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (589,277)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (589,277)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)


</TABLE>
#### Fratkin, etc., v. Wolfe et al.

*Myron A. Pinkus,*for plaintiff.

*Needle, Needle & Needle,*for defendants.

March 6, 1952.

Hoban, P. J.,

— In this action on a book account for goods sold and delivered plaintiff filed a petition for discovery under Pa. R. C. P. 4007. Apparently plaintiff wants to interrogate defendants to discover whether the consignees of the goods sold and delivered at the order and by the direction of defendants are agents or subsidiaries of defendants, to identify the owners and officers of such consignees, to verify delivery, to ascertain the circumstances of payment by defendants for containers of the goods so delivered, and to ascertain other matters “incidental and germane to the issues raised by the pleadings”.

But as we see the issues raised by the pleadings, the only question is whether or not these defendants de*428livered certain materials to plaintiff for processing, whether plaintiff processed them at defendants’ order, whether or not plaintiff delivered them to consignees as directed by defendants, and whether or not the prices for the work were as agreed to between plaintiff and defendants. All of these matters are obviously within the knowledge of plaintiff, and while the intent of the rule is to permit plaintiff to discover matters which are necessary either to the preparation of his pleading or to the presentation of a prima facie case, the rule certainly is not intended to permit a plaintiff to go on an exploration or to provide ammunition against an anticipated defense.

The petition asks for a discovery of matters which either are not relevant and material to the subject matter of the pending action as disclosed by the complaint, or which are not necessary to enable plaintiff to prove a prima facie claim. See Pa. R. C. P. 4011.

Now, March 6, 1952, the motion to permit plaintiff to take oral depositions for the purpose of discovery from defendants is denied, and the petition, therefore, is directed to be stricken from the record.
# L_2019267EN.01000101.xml

| 21.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 267/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 267/1

---

EUROPEAN COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2019/1740

of 18 October 2019

appointing the President of the European Central Bank

THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 283(2) thereof,

Having regard to the recommendation of the Council of the European Union (1),

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (2),

Having regard to the opinion of the Governing Council of the European Central Bank (3),

Whereas:

| (1) | The term of office of the President of the European Central Bank, Mr Mario DRAGHI, appointed by European Council Decision 2011/386/EU (4), expires on 31 October 2019 and it is therefore necessary to appoint a new President of the European Central Bank. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The term of office of the President of the European Central Bank, Mr Mario DRAGHI, appointed by European Council Decision 2011/386/EU (4), expires on 31 October 2019 and it is therefore necessary to appoint a new President of the European Central Bank.

| (2) | The European Council wishes to appoint Ms Christine LAGARDE who, in its view, meets all the requirements set out in Article 283(2) of the Treaty, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The European Council wishes to appoint Ms Christine LAGARDE who, in its view, meets all the requirements set out in Article 283(2) of the Treaty,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Ms Christine LAGARDE is hereby appointed President of the European Central Bank for a term of office of eight years as from 1 November 2019.

Article 2

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 18 October 2019.

For the European Council

The President

D. TUSK

---

(1)  
  OJ C 235, 12.7.2019, p. 1.

1

(2)  Opinion delivered on 17 September 2019 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

2

(3)  
  OJ C 258, 1.8.2019, p. 2.

3

(4)  European Council Decision 2011/386/EU of 24 June 2011 appointing the President of the European Central Bank (OJ L 173, 1.7.2011, p. 8).

4

---
**Exhibit 32.1**
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Front Range Capital Corporation (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, William A. Mitchell, Jr. Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    /s/ William A. Mitchell, Jr.   William A. Mitchell, Jr. Chief Executive Officer
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to FrontRange Capital Corporation and will be retained by Front Range Capital Corporation and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER





Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)
and


Rules
13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934





I, Keith
A. Meister, Principal Executive Officer of Icahn Enterprises G.P. Inc., the
general partner of Icahn Enterprises L.P. (the “Registrant”), certify that, to
the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Icahn Enterprises L.P.
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 of the
Registrant (the “Report”):




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.




/s/
      Keith A. MeisterKeith
      A. MeisterPrincipal
      Executive Officer and Vice Chairman of the Board of Icahn Enterprises G.P.
      Inc., the general partner of Icahn Enterprises
  L.P.





Date:
August 5, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>          THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL
                  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
                  COMPANY'S UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                  AS OF AND FOR THE PERIOD ENDING MARCH 29,
                  1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY 
                  REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
<MULTIPLIER>      1,000
               
<S>                                           <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-3-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                  MAR-29-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       3-MOS

<CASH>                                                  0
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     103,881
<ALLOWANCES>                                          500
<INVENTORY>                                        74,922
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  226,415
<PP&E>                                            175,401
<DEPRECIATION>                                     51,956
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    484,316
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             186,428
<BONDS>                                             1,109
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                           48,377
<OTHER-SE>                                        199,108
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      484,316
<SALES>                                           362,957
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  362,957
<CGS>                                             308,756
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     308,756
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    346
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    22,654
<INCOME-TAX>                                        9,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                13,654
<DISCONTINUED>                                        185
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                       13,839
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0.28

        

</TABLE>
#### Eden Township School District v. Fisher

*268
      *Ralph W. Eby, Jr.,*for plaintiff.

*Merrill L. Hassel,*for defendant.

January 19, 1951.

Wissler, J.,

— The above lien for school tax was filed against lands of defendants situated in Eden Township, Lancaster County, Pa., containing 142 acres and 47 perches, more or less. A rule was granted to show cause why the lien should not be stricken off, upon petition of defendants alleging that they had paid their school taxes in the School District of Bart Township under an order of the Court of Quarter Sessions of Lancaster County dated January 19, 1878, and set forth in road dkt. no. 20, page 722, of the records of the Court of Quarter Sessions of Lancaster County.

The Act of April 17,1876, P. L. 38, empowering the courts of quarter sessions of this Commonwealth to annex the land or parts thereof of persons resident in one district to another district for school purposes, under which the order was made, as well as the Acts of June 8, 1881, P. L. 69, and of June 2, 1891, P. L. 172, authorizing the courts of quarter sessions to annul and set aside decrees annexing such lands of persons of one township to another township for school purposes, were expressly repealed by the Act of May 18, 1911, P. L. 309, and by section 108 thereof all lands heretofore taken from one school district and annexed to another, whether by act of assembly or order of court, or otherwise, were made a part of the school district established by the act of assembly in which such lands were located.

And now, January 19, 1951, because of the above repeals, it is ordered that the rule to strike off the lien filed by the School District of the Township of Eden to Municipal lien dkt. no. 51, page 600, be discharged, and the lien filed to remain on the record.
• Interim Decision #1425 

MAlitat. OP YOUNG 

In Visa Petition Proceedings 

A-8869467 

Decided by District Director September 8, 1964 

First preference quota status under section 203(a) (1), Immigration and Naidonaumy Act, as amended, as a dentist, la aeeorded the beneficiary of a 

petition filed by an organization—the Village 'of DeWitt, Michigan, which, 

acting on behalf of the community; desires, and has established an urgent 

need for, the services of the beneficiary—even though benticiary will not be 

in the actual employ of the petitioner. 

The petitioner, the Village of DeWitt, Michigan, seeks to bring a 

dentist to DeWitt as a private practitioner to provide dental services for the people in. the community and the surrounding area. The 

population of DeWitt is 1,300 and 7,000 persons live in the surrounding area. 

The petitioner requires a dentist with the degree of doctor of dental surgery. The nearest. dentists are in Lansing, Michigan, eight 

miles away. Appointments must often be scheduled two to four 

months in advance... The Bureau of EMployment Security has found 

that the occupation is one for which nationallythe supply of available workeis is inadequate to meet all demands. 

The beneficiary is an 'unmarried, 32-year-old British subject, who. 

was born in Hong Kong. Ho was admitted to the United States as 

a nonimmigrant. Evidence has been presented that he received the 

degree of doctor of dental surgery' from the University of Detroit, 

Detroit, Michigan, in June 1963. He is employed as a dentist at 

Wayne County General Hospital, Eloise, Michigan, 

Under section 203(a) (1) (A) of 'the Immigration and Nationality • 

Act, first preference quota status may be accorded to "qualified quota 

immigrants -whose services are determined by the Attorney General 

to be needed urgently in the United States because of the Itgh education, technical training„ specialized experience, or exceptional ability of such immigrants and to be substantially beneficial 

96- 
Interim Decision #1425 . 

prospectively to the national economy, cultural interests, or welfare 

of the United States". 

Those who may file a visa petition under section 204(b) of the Act 

to have an alien classified as a first preference quota immigrant are 

"any person, institution, firm, organization, or governmental agency 

desiring to have an alien classified as an immigrant under * * * section 208(a) (1) (A)". 

While the Village of DeWitt will not be the beneficiary's actual 

employer, it is an organization which, acting on behalf of the community, desires the services of the beneficiary and has established•an 

urgent need for his services. 

The beneficiary has the required high education and his Services 

would be substantially beneficial prospectively to the welfare of the 

United States. 

Since the requirements of the statute have been met, the petition 

will be approved. 

ORDER: It. s ordered that the petition be approved.
[No. 21040-1-II.

Division Two.

December 12, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Paul G. Deschamps, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Mason County, No. 96-1-00053-1, James B. Sawyer II, J., entered July 18, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Houghton, C.J., concurred in by Seinfeld and Bridge-water, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      11,569,087
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,565,600
<ALLOWANCES>                                    66,724
<INVENTORY>                                  3,360,437
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            21,859,456
<PP&E>                                      12,284,175
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,416,886
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              30,726,745
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,615,469
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        85,279
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,626,363
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                30,726,745
<SALES>                                     14,142,748
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,474,462
<CGS>                                       10,366,567
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,200,429
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,530,433
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                22,500
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             284,042
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                956,317
<INCOME-TAX>                                    44,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            912,317
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   912,317
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 172
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 172 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; 70 FR 72074, Dec. 1, 2005; and 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 172.590 Yeast-malt sprout extract. Yeast-malt sprout extract, as described in this section, may be safely used in food in accordance with the following prescribed conditions: ( a ) The additive is produced by partial hydrolysis of yeast extract (derived from *Saccharomyces cereviseae, Saccharomyces fragilis,* or *Candida utilis*) using the sprout portion of malt barley as the source of enzymes. The additive contains a maximum of 6 percent 5′ nucleotides by weight.
( b ) The additive may be used as a flavor enhancer in food at a level not in excess of that reasonably required to produce the intended effect.
[No. 37419-2-I.

Division One.

December 8, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Keith Thomas Wheeler, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 94-1-01403-4, Richard J. Thorpe, J., entered October 4, 1995. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Grosse, J., concurred in by Agid and Ellington, JJ.
###### Editorial Note on Part 137

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 137 appear at 63 FR 14035, Mar. 24, 1998.

#### § 137.205 Bromated whole wheat flour.

Bromated whole wheat flour conforms to the definition and standard of identity, and is subject to the requirements for label statement of ingredients, prescribed for whole wheat flour by § 137.200, except that potassium bromate is added in a quantity not exceeding 75 parts to each million parts of finished bromated whole wheat flour.

[58 FR 2877, Jan. 6, 1993]
§ 520.2582 Triflupromazine. ( a ) *Specifications.* Each tablet contains 10 or 25 milligrams (mg) triflupromazine hydrochloride.
( b ) *Sponsor.* See No. 054771 in § 510.600(c) of this chapter.
( c ) *Conditions of use in dogs and cats* — ( 1 ) *Amount.* Administer orally 1 to 2 mg per pound of body weight daily, followed by 1 mg daily.
( 2 ) *Indications for use.* For relief of anxiety, to help control psychomotor over-activity, and to increase the tolerance of animals to pain and pruritus. For use in various clinical procedures which require the aid of a tranquilizer, antiemetic, or preanesthetic.
( 3 ) *Limitations.* Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian.
[79 FR 28833, May 20, 2014]
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7182 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7182

    To authorize the National Guard to take such actions as may be 
 necessary to repel persons attempting to enter the United States from 
        Mexico who are carrying weapons, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 1, 2024

Mr. Luttrell (for himself, Mr. Fleischmann, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Babin, Mr. 
   Guest, Mr. Collins, and Mr. Williams of New York) introduced the 
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services, 
 and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To authorize the National Guard to take such actions as may be 
 necessary to repel persons attempting to enter the United States from 
        Mexico who are carrying weapons, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Defend Our Borders From Armed 
Invaders Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORITY OF NATIONAL GUARD TO REPEL PERSONS ATTEMPTING TO 
              ENTER THE UNITED STATES FROM MEXICO WHO ARE CARRYING 
              WEAPONS.

    (a) Authority.--Section 502(f)(2) of title 32, United States Code, 
is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
            ``(C) Notwithstanding section 1385 of title 18, such 
        actions as may be necessary to repel any person who is--
                    ``(i) attempting to enter the United States by land 
                across the border between the United States and Mexico; 
                and
                    ``(ii) clearly carrying a weapon.''.
                                 <all>
```