alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### ANONYMOUS.

On reference, with agreement that it be made a rule of court. No costs being reported, none are allowed.

The cause had been submitted to reference out of court, on an agreement that the submission be made a rule of this court. The referees reported a sum in favor of the plaintiff, but had said nothing as to costs. The question was, whether the plaintiff was entitled to costs.

By the Court.

— This is a proceeding under the 1st section of the act, for regulating references and determining controversies, by arbitrationwhich section is a copy of the statute of *9 and 10 William 111. C. 15.*The remedy in favor of the prevailing party, in this case, is, that the party refusing obedience to, or neglecting to comply with the arbitration or umpirage, is subject to all the penalties of contemning a rule of court. It is necessary, then, to show, that the defendant hath refused obedience to, or neglected to com*214ply with the report of the referees. The referees not having awarded costs, how can the court say that the defendant is .default, in not complying with the award or report of the referees.1

*Hunter,*for plaintiff.

*Ewing,*for defendant.

Costs disallowed.2

1

*Pat. 141.*— Rev. *Laws, 158.*

1

 It is not uncommon for the prevailing party, in these cases of submissions out of court, on bringing in the report, to enter up judgment and issue execution, as in other cases. This practice cannot be supported, and is at variance with the opinion of the court in this case.

2

 Vide *South. 117. 7 Halst. 865*—Ed.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-40997 Summary Calendar

EDDIE TYLER, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus WAYNE SCOTT, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division; L. WOODS, Warden; D. STARK, Doctor; O. CISNEROS; L. EASON, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-96-CV-347

- - - - - - - - - - August 8, 1997 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, KING and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Texas prisoner Eddie Tyler, No. 535926, appeals the dismissal of his suit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Tyler argues that the defendants were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical need and that they conspired to retaliate against him. We have reviewed the record and Tyler’s brief and find no evidence of deliberate indifference to a serious medicalNo. 96-40997 -2- need. See Mendoza v. Lynaugh , 989 F.2d 191, 193-94 (5th Cir. 1993); Jackson v. Cain , 864 F.2d 1235, 1246 (5th Cir. 1989). Tyler’s conclusional allegations that the defendants conspired to retaliate against him fail to state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Babb v. Dorman , 33 F.3d 472, 476 (5th Cir. 1994). Tyler has moved the court for a preliminary injunction; filed four motions to supplement his appellate brief; and requested that the court appoint appellate counsel, order entry of his exhibits, and allow “final arguments.” He asks that a panel of the court review his x-rays, and he has filed a motion concerning jurisdiction which does not request any form of relief. The foregoing motions are DENIED.
AFFIRMED. MOTIONS DENIED.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7404 

To require annual reports on counter illicit cross-border tunnel operations, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2024 

Mr. CRANE (for himself, Mr. CORREA, Mr. BIGGS, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. GOSAR, 

Mr. GUEST, Mr. HIGGINS of Louisiana, Mr. LUTTRELL, Mr. MCCAUL, 

and Mr. OGLES) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To require annual reports on counter illicit cross-border 

tunnel operations, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Subterranean Border 

5 Defense Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ANNUAL REPORTS ON COUNTER ILLICIT CROSS7 BORDER TUNNEL OPERATIONS. 

8 Paragraph (2) of section 7134(a) of the James M. 

9 Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7404 IH

1 2023 (Public Law 117–263; 6 U.S.C. 257 note) is amend2 ed by inserting ‘‘and annually thereafter’’ after ‘‘develop3 ment of the strategic plan’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
§ 520.1150 Imepitoin. ( a ) *Specifications.* Each tablet contains 100 or 400 milligrams (mg) imepitoin.
( b ) *Sponsor.* See No. 000010 in § 510.600(c) of this chapter.
( c ) *Conditions of use* — ( 1 ) *Amount.* Administer orally twice daily, approximately 12 hours apart, at a dose of 13.6 mg per pound (30 mg/kg) of body weight. Initiate therapy starting 2 days prior to the day of the expected noise event and continuing through the noise event.
( 2 ) *Indications for use.* For the treatment of noise aversion in dogs.
( 3 ) *Limitations.* Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian.
[84 FR 12494, Apr. 2, 2019]
**Exhibit 10.18**

 

**Executive Officer Compensation**

** **
| **Executive  Officer** | ** ** | **Title**                | ** ** | **Base  Annual  Salary** | ** ** | **Bonus Plan  Compensation** | ** ** | **Other Annual  Compensation** |
|------------------------|------------|--------------------------|------------|--------------------------|------------|------------------------------|------------|--------------------------------|
| Carl Mostert           |       | Chief  Executive Officer |       | $                        | 230,000    |                         | *          |                           | None |
| Johann  Leitner        |       | VP,  Strategic Marketing |       | $                        | 224,000    |                         | *          |                           | None |
| John Low               |       | Chief  Financial Officer |       | $                        | 195,000    |                         | *          |                           | None |
| Alan Kiraly            |       | VP, Product  Development |       | $                        | 135,000    |                         | *          |                           | None |

 

----

* Bonus compensation is determined annually at the discretion of thecompensation committee of the Board of Directors.

 

----
§ 520.1638 Oxibendazole. ( a ) *Specifications.* ( 1 ) Each gram of paste contains 227 milligrams (mg) (22.7 percent) oxibendazole.
( 2 ) Each milliliter of suspension contains 100 mg (10 percent) oxibendazole.
( b ) *Sponsor.* See No. 054771 in § 510.600(c) of this chapter.
( c ) *Special considerations.* ( 1 ) See § 500.25 of this chapter.
( 2 ) Suspension product described in paragraph (a)(2) of this section shall be labeled: “Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian.”
( d ) *Conditions of use in horses* — ( 1 ) *Amount.* For uses other than for threadworms (*Strongyloides westeri*), 10 mg oxibendazole per kilogram (/kg) body weight; for threadworms (*Strongyloides westeri*), 15 mg/kg. Horses maintained on premises where reinfection is likely to occur should be re-treated in 6 to 8 weeks. Administer suspension product by stomach tube in 3 to 4 pints of warm water, or by top dressing or mixing into a portion of the normal grain ration.
( 2 ) *Indications for use.* For removal and control of large strongyles (*Strongylus edentatus, S. equinus,* *S. vulgaris*); small strongyles (genera *Cylicostephanus, Cylicocyclus,* *Cyathostomum, Triodontophorus,* *Cylicodontophorus,* and *Gyalocephalus*); large roundworms (*Parascaris equorum*); pinworms (*Oxyuris equi*) including various larval stages; and threadworms (*Strongyloides westeri*).
( 3 ) *Limitations.* Do not use in horses intended for human consumption.
[78 FR 28825, May 20, 2014]
#### § 520.88 Amoxicillin oral dosage forms.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

Consent of Stegman and Company

 

 

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

** **

Boardof Directors and StockholdersFirst Mariner BancorpBaltimore, Maryland

 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos.333-60961, 333-60963, 333-60967, 333-107669, 333-114073 and 333-122464) onForm S-8 (No. 333-107670) on Form S-3 and (No. 333-67854)on Form S-2 of First Mariner Bancorp (the “Company”) of our report datedMarch 1, 2006, relating to the consolidated statements of financialcondition of the Company as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the relatedconsolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity and cashflows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005,management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting as of December 31, 2005 and the effectiveness of internal controlover financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, which reports appear in theDecember 31, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K of the Company.

 
|                 | /s/ Stegman  & Company |   |
|----------------------|----------------------------|--------|
|                 |                       |
| Baltimore,  Maryland |                       |
| March 15,  2006 |                       |

 

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     Exhibit 21

        SUBSIDIARIES OF CYBEX COMPUTER PRODUCTS CORPORATION

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Name of Subsidiary                                    State or Country of Organization
------------------                                     --------------------------------
<S>                                                                 <C>
Cybex Computer Products International, Ltd.                         Ireland

Cybex International Corporation                                     Barbados

Cybex Computertechnik, GmbH                                         Germany

Elsner Computertechnik, GmbH                                        Germany

PolyCon Data Systems, GmbH                                          Germany

PolyCon Investments, Inc., d/b/a Cybex Employment Services Co.      Texas

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 184
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 184 appear at 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; and 81 FR 49897, July 29, 2016.

§ 184.1296 Ferric ammonium citrate. ( a ) Ferric ammonium citrate (iron (III) ammonium citrate) is prepared by the reaction of ferric hydroxide with citric acid, followed by treatment with ammonium hydroxide, evaporating, and drying. The resulting product occurs in two forms depending on the stoichiometry of the initial reactants. ( 1 ) Ferric ammonium citrate (iron (III) ammonium citrate, CAS Reg. No. 1332-98-5) is a complex salt of undetermined structure composed of 16.5 to 18.5 percent iron, approximately 9 percent ammonia, and 65 percent citric acid and occurs as reddish brown or garnet red scales or granules or as a brownish-yellowish powder.
( 2 ) Ferric ammonium citrate (iron (III) ammonium citrate, CAS Reg. No. 1333-00-2) is a complex salt of undetermined structure composed of 14.5 to 16 percent iron, approximately 7.5 percent ammonia, and 75 percent citric acid and occurs as thin transparent green scales, as granules, as a powder, or as transparent green crystals.
( b ) The ingredients meet the specifications of the Food Chemicals Codex, 3d Ed. (1981), pp. 116-117 (Ferric ammonium citrate, brown) and p. 117 (Ferric ammonium citrate, green), which is incorporated by reference. Copies are available from the National Academy Press, 2101 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20418, or available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .*
( c ) In accordance with § 184.1(b)(1), the ingredients are used in food as nutrient supplements as defined in § 170.3(o)(20) of this chapter, with no limitation other than current good manufacturing practice. The ingredients may also be used in infant formula in accordance with section 412(g) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. 350a(g)) or with regulations promulgated under section 412(a)(2) of the act (21 U.S.C. 350a(a)(2)).
( d ) Prior sanctions for these ingredients different from the uses established in this section do not exist or have been waived.
[53 FR 16864, May 12, 1988]
## 

Exhibit 99.1

ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE       RETAILERS NATIONAL BANK       TARGET CREDIT CARD MASTER TRUST

The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Retailers National Bank, as Servicer ("RNB"), pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of
September 13, 1995, as supplemented by the Series 1995-1 Supplement, the Series 1996-1 Supplement, the Series 1997-1, and the Series 1998-1 Supplement (as may be
amended and supplemented from time to time, the "Agreement"), among Target Receivables Corporation, as Transferor, RNB as Servicer, and Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association, as Trustee, does
hereby certify that:



IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate as of the 25th day of March, 2000.

| |  | RETAILERS NATIONAL BANK,
as Servicer,
| |  | -------------------------------------
| |  | By:                                  

---

## QuickLinks
#### § 212.10 What personnel and resources must I have?

You must have a sufficient number of personnel with the necessary education, background, training, and experience to perform their assigned functions. You must have adequate resources, including facilities and equipment, to enable your personnel to perform their functions.
EXHIBIT 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT

REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



To
the Board of Directors and Shareholders

of The Southern Banc Company, Inc.



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement No. 333-3546 on Form S-8 of The Southern Banc Company, Inc.
of our report dated August 12, 2005 with respect to the consolidated statement of financial condition of The Southern Banc Company, Inc. as of June 30, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders equity, and
cash flows for the year then ended, which report appears in the June 30, 2005 annual report on Form 10-KSB of The Southern Banc Company, Inc.



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|/s/ Barfield, Murphy, Shank & Smith, P.C.
|                                         
|Birmingham, Alabama                      
|September 27, 2005
#### People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald Edmonds and Larry J. Edmonds, Defendants-Appellants.

Gen. Nos. 52,392, 52,393. (Consolidated.)

First District, Second Division.

April 15,1969.

Gerald W. Getty, Public Defender of Cook County, of Chicago (James J. Doherty, Assistant Public Defender, of counsel), for appellants; John J. Stamos, State’s Attorney of Cook County, of Chicago (Elmer C. Kissane and Gerald L. Rohrer, Assistant State’s Attorneys, of counsel), for appellee.

Opinion by

PRESIDING JUSTICE LYONS.

Not to be published in full.
[Cite as Toledo Bar Assn. v. Burkholder , 126 Ohio St.3d 1232, 2010-Ohio-4256.]

T OLEDO B AR A SSOCIATION v . B URKHOLDER . [Cite as Toledo Bar Assn. v. Burkholder, 126 Ohio St.3d 1232, 2010-Ohio-4256.] (No. 2005-2394 — Submitted August 10, 2010 — Decided August 26, 2010.)
O N A PPLICATION FOR R EINSTATEMENT

.

__________________ {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by responde nt, Fred Joseph Burkholder, Attorney Registration No. 0014094, last known bus iness address in Toledo, Ohio. {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its orders of June 21, 2006, and September 17, 2008, wherein the court, pur suant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of si x months, finds that respondent has substantially complied with those orders and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore, {¶ 3} It is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. {¶ 4} It is further ordered that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V( 8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication. {¶ 5} For earlier cases, see Toledo Bar Assn. v. Burkholder , 109 Ohio St.3d 443, 2006-Ohio-2817, 848 N.E.2d 840, and 119 Ohio St.3d 1457, 2008- Ohio-4665, 893 N.E.2d 848.
B ROWN , C.J., and P FEIFER , L UNDBERG S TRATTON , O’C ONNOR , O’D ONNELL , L ANZINGER , and C UPP , JJ., concur.

______________________
§ 3.5 Procedures for identifying the designated agency component. ( a ) ( 1 ) The Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, the Center for Devices and Radiological Health, and the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research have entered into agreements clarifying product jurisdictional issues. These guidance documents are on display in the Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852, and are entitled “Intercenter Agreement Between the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research and the Center for Devices and Radiological Health;” “Intercenter Agreement Between the Center for Devices and Radiological Health and the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research;” “Intercenter Agreement Between the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research and the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research.” The availability of any amendments to these intercenter agreements will be announced by Federal Register notice.
( 2 ) These guidance documents describe the allocation of responsibility for categories of products or specific products. These intercenter agreements, and any amendments thereto, are nonbinding determinations designed to provide useful guidance to the public.
( 3 ) The sponsor of a premarket application or required investigational filing for a combination or other product covered by these guidance documents may contact the designated agency component identified in the intercenter agreement before submitting an application of premarket review or to confirm coverage and to discuss the application process.
( b ) For a combination product not covered by a guidance document or for a product where the agency component with primary jurisdiction is unclear or in dispute, the sponsor of an application for premarket review should follow the procedures set forth in § 3.7 to request a designation of the agency component with primary jurisdiction before submitting the application.
[56 FR 58756, Nov. 21, 1991, as amended at 68 FR 24879, May 9, 2003; 88 FR 45064, July 14, 2023]
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Employment Outlook for Engineers : Employment Trends and Outlook, Earnings, Occupational Mobility

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics					 and 	Wood, Helen. 						*Employment Outlook for Engineers : Employment Trends and Outlook, Earnings, Occupational Mobility : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 968*,												Washington: 								U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 										1950,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4384,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
EXHIBIT 10.56

                              Note to Exhibit 10.56



         The following Purchase Agreement Assignment is substantially identical
in all material respects to five additional Purchase Agreement Assignments
except as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


Owner Participant                                        Date                                          Aircraft (Tail No.)
-----------------                                        ----
<S>                                                      <C>                                           <C>
NCC Charlie Company*                                     September 10, 1998*                           N575ML*
NCC Charlie Company                                      September 10, 1998                            N576ML
General Electric Capital Corporation                     November 10, 1998                             N577ML
General Electric Capital Corporation                     November 10, 1998                             N578ML
Castle Harbour Leasing Inc.                              December 10, 1998                             N579ML                      
NCC Charlie Company                                      January 25, 1999                              N580ML                     
</TABLE>





------------------

*   Filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
    quarter ended September 30, 1998.
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Fifth Circuit**

____________ No. 23-40368 Summary Calendar

____________ United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee ,
versus Eleuterio Covarrubias-Martinez, Defendant—Appellant

.

______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:22-CR-1932-1

______________________________ Before Smith, Higginson, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam: * Eleuterio Covarrubias-Martinez appe als his conviction and sentence for being found in the United States afte r a previous deportation. He argues that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) is unconstitutional because it allows a sentence above the otherwise applicable statutory ma ximum established by § 1326(a) based

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 17, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-40368 Document: 00516973176 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/17/2023No. 23-40368

2 on facts that are neither alleged in th e indictment nor found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. Covarrubias-Martinez has filed an unopposed motion for summary disposition and a letter brief correctly co nceding that the only issue he raises is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998). See United States v. Pervis , 937 F.3d 546, 553-54 (5th Cir. 2019). He explains that he has raised the issue to preserve it for possible further review. Accordingly, because summary dispositi on is appropriate, see Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis , 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1 969), Covarrubias-Martinez’s motion is GRANTED , and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED

. Case: 23-40368 Document: 00516973176 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/17/2023