alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 25, 2017

s0717

Order 

Clerk

July 25, 2017

154323

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 154323

COA: 326709

St Clair CC: 14-001044-FH;

14-001047-FH

DONALD RAY FERGUSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 19, 2016 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

WILDER, J., did not participate because he was on the Court of Appeals panel.
Editorial Note on Part 108
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 108 appear at 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 108.19 Establishment of requirements for exemption from section 404 of the act. ( a ) Whenever the Commissioner finds after investigation that the distribution in interstate commerce of any class of food may, by reason of contamination with microorganisms during the manufacture, processing, or packing thereof in any locality, be injurious to health, and that such injurious nature cannot be adequately determined after such articles have entered interstate commerce, he shall promulgate regulations in Subpart B of this part establishing requirements and conditions governing the manufacture, processing, or packing of the food necessary to protect the public health. Such regulations may be proposed by the Commissioner on his own initiative or in response to a petition from any interested person pursuant to part 10 of this chapter.
( b ) A manufacturer, processor, or packer of a food for which a regulation has been promulgated in subpart B of this part shall be exempt from the requirement for a permit only if he meets all of the mandatory requirements and conditions established in that regulation.
[42 FR 14334, Mar. 15, 1977, as amended at 42 FR 15673, Mar. 22, 1977]
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned officer ofSpescom Software, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies to his knowledge thatthe Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004(the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Thiscertification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not bedeemed to be a part of the Report or “filed” for any purpose whatsoever.

 
| Dated:                   | May 14, 2004 |   |   |
|--------------------------|--------------|--------|--------|
|                     |         |
| /s/ John Low             |         |   |
| John Low                 |         |
| Chief  Financial Officer |         |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Spescom SoftwareInc. and will be retained by Spescom Software, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of

MICHAEL WILLIAM SHOWERS

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT
FROM RETIRED STATUS :

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 161 DB 201 9 (No. 96 RST 2019)

Attorney Registration No. 62091

( Dauphin County )

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 25 th day of November

, 201 9 , the Report and Recommendation of

Disciplinary Board Member dated November 19, 2019

, is approved and it is ORDERED

that Michael William Showers

, who has been on Retired Status

, has never been

suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications,

competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth,

shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this

Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing

of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner.
EXHIBIT 32.1
  
  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A (the “Form 10-Q/A”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 of Crimson Exploration Inc. (the “Issuer”).  The undersigned hereby certifies that the Form 10-Q/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
 
 Date:
August 30, 2010/s/ Allan D. KeelName:
Allan D. KeelTitle:
President and Chief Executive Officer
 
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Issuer and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission, or its staff, upon request.
Exhibit 31.1
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Albert A. Koch, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of ChampionEnterprises, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have;
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: April 30, 2004 /s/  ALBERT A. KOCH  Albert A. Koch   Chairman of the Board, President &Chief Executive Officer
# L_2019132DE.01004701.xml

| 20.5.2019 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 132/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.5.2019

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 132/47

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) 2018/231 der Europäischen Zentralbank vom 26. Januar 2018 über die statistischen Berichtspflichten der Altersvorsorgeeinrichtungen (EZB/2018/2)

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 45 vom 17. Februar 2018
  )

Auf den Seiten 10 bis 13 in den Tabellen 1a und 1b, die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften „Mitgliedstaaten des Euro-Währungsgebiets ohne Inland (gesamt)“:

Anstatt:

„Mitgliedstaaten des Euro-Währungsgebiets ohne Inland (gesamt)“

muss es heißen:

„Inland/Mitgliedstaaten des Euro-Währungsgebiets ohne Inland (gesamt)“.

---
<PAGE>

                               EXHIBIT 23.1
                     CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
First Mariner Bancorp:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Nos. 333-60961, 333-60963 and 333-60967) on Form S-8 of First Mariner
Bancorp and subsidiary (First Mariner) of our report dated March 16, 2001,
relating to the consolidated statements of financial condition of First
Mariner as of December 31, 2000, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for the years then
ended, which report appears in the December 31, 2000 annual report on Form
10-K of First Mariner.

                                       /s/ Stegman & Company


Baltimore, Maryland
March 29, 2001
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7431 

To amend part A of title IV of the Social Security Act to measure improper 

payments and establish goals for eliminating fraud and improper payments under the program of block grants to States for temporary assistance for needy families, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 23, 2024 

Mr. ARRINGTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend part A of title IV of the Social Security Act 

to measure improper payments and establish goals for 

eliminating fraud and improper payments under the program of block grants to States for temporary assistance 

for needy families, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Eliminating Fraud and 

5 Improper Payments in TANF Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7431 IH

1 SEC. 2. STRENGTHENING PROGRAM INTEGRITY THROUGH 

2 IMPROPER PAYMENTS REVIEW. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 404 of the Social Security 

4 Act (42 U.S.C. 604) is amended by adding at the end the 

5 following: 

6 ‘‘(l) APPLICABILITY OF PAYMENT INTEGRITY LAW.— 

7 The Payment Integrity Information Act of 2019 shall 

8 apply to a State in respect of the State program funded 

9 under this part in the same manner in which such Act 

10 applies to a Federal agency.’’. 

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

12 subsection (a) shall take effect on October 1, 2025. 

13 (c) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Within 1 year after the 

14 date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Health 

15 and Human Services shall submit to the Congress a writ16 ten report that contains a plan to reduce or eliminate im17 proper payments made by States under part A of title IV 

18 of the Social Security Act within 10 years. 

19 SEC. 3. TWO-YEAR REAUTHORIZATION OF THE TEMPORARY 

20 ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY FAMILIES PRO21 GRAM. 

22 Activities authorized by part A of title IV (other than 

23 under section 403(c) or 418) and section 1108(b) of the 

24 Social Security Act shall continue through September 30, 

25 2026, in the manner authorized for fiscal year 2023, and 

26 out of any money in the Treasury of the United States 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7431 IH

1 not otherwise appropriated, there are hereby appropriated 

2 such sums as may be necessary for such purpose. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
§ 520.1802c Piperazine-carbon disulfide complex with phenothiazine suspension. ( a ) *Specifications.* Each fluid ounce contains 5 grams of piperazine-carbon disulfide complex and 0.83 gram of phenothiazine.
( b ) *Sponsor.* See No. 054771 in § 510.600(c) of this chapter.
( c ) *Conditions of use in horses and ponies* — ( 1 ) *Amount.* Administer 1 fluid ounce per 100 pounds of body weight by stomach tube or dose syringe after withholding feed overnight or for 8 to 10 hours.
( 2 ) *Indications for use.* For removing ascarids (large roundworms, *Parascaris equorum*), bots (*Gastrophilus* spp.), small strongyles, and large strongyles (*Strongylus* spp.).
( 3 ) *Limitations.* Do not use in horses intended for human consumption. Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian.
[45 FR 52782, Aug. 8, 1980, as amended at 78 FR 28826, May 20, 2014]
§ 20.22 Partial disclosure of records. ( a ) If a record contains both disclosable and nondisclosable information, the nondisclosable information will be deleted and the remaining record will be disclosed unless the two are so inextricably intertwined that it is not feasible to separate them or release of the disclosable information would compromise or impinge upon the nondisclosable portion of the record.
( b ) ( 1 ) Whenever information is deleted from a record that contains both disclosable and nondisclosable information, the amount of information deleted shall be indicated on the portion of the record that is made available, unless including that indication would harm an interest protected by an exemption under the Freedom of Information Act.
( 2 ) When technically feasible, the amount of information deleted shall be indicated at the place in the record where the deletion is made.
( 3 ) The exemption(s) under which the information has been deleted shall be noted at the site of the deletion.
[42 FR 15616, Mar. 22, 1977, as amended at 68 FR 25285, May 12, 2003; 87 FR 55911, Sept. 13, 2022]
OSLDPS Information Bulletin

No. 00-009 July 24, 2000

TO: All State Administrative Agency Heads

All State Administrative Agency Points of Contact

FROM: C.H. “Butch” Straub, II

Director

SUBJECT: Availability of On-Line Data Collection Tool Mock-up for Practice and Training

A mock-up of the complete on-line data collection tool has now been activated by the Office for

State and Local Domestic Preparedness (OSLDPS), Office of Justice Programs (OJP). As you

know, the on-line data collection tool is being made available for States who choose to use this

method to submit needs assessment data and strategic plans. The mock-up of this tool will allow

State and local users to familiarize themselves with the system and practice entering data in a

realistic training environment. However, the mock-up will not allow the user to save any data. 

The mock-up may be accessed from the OSLDPS home page located at the following URL:

www.ojp.usdoj.gov/osldps. Icons for the mock-up are located under “What’s New” on the home

page, as well as on the Assessments and Grant pages. After you locate the icon, simply click on

“Practice Module” and follow the instructions provided.

As a reminder, the user registration module of the on-line data collection tool is also now

available for State Administrative Agencies (SAAs) and other state and local users who will

participate in the actual data entry process. OJP will implement the second phase of the data

collection process on August 1, 2000. At that time, software will be made available on-line for

local jurisdiction data input. SAAs will be able to input data beginning August 15, 2000, when

the third phase of the on-line process is implemented. 

For technical assistance with the on-line data collection tool, you may contact the OJP toll-free

help line at: 1-888-549-9901. You may also contact your OSLDPS program manager for

additional information and assistance related to conduct of the needs assessment and development

of your state strategy. 

I look forward to working with you and your colleagues during the implementation of this

program to enhance state and local emergency response capabilities.
[No. 38348-5-I.

Division One.

December 1, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. August Rekar, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 95-1-03287-3, Ricardo S. Martinez, J., entered February 26, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
§ 522.1242 Levamisole. ( a ) *Specifications.* Each milliliter of solution contains levamisole phosphate equivalent to 136.5 or 182 milligrams of levamisole hydrochloride (13.65 or 18.2 percent).
( b ) *Sponsor.* See Nos. 000061 and 016592 in § 510.600 of this chapter for use of 13.65 percent injection, and see No. 054771 for use of 13.65 and 18.2 percent injection.
( c ) *Related tolerances.* See § 556.350 of this chapter.
( d ) *Conditions of use* — ( 1 ) *Amount.* 2 milliliters per 100 pounds of body weight, subcutaneously in the neck.
( 2 ) *Indications for use.* ( i ) The 13.65 percent injection is used as an anthelmintic in cattle for treatment of the following parasites: stomach worms (*Haemonchus, Trichostrongylus, Ostertagia*), intestinal worms (*Trichostrongylus, Cooperia, Nematodirus, Bunostomum, Oesophagostomum, Chabertia*), and lungworms (*Dictyocaulus*).
( ii ) The 18.2 percent injection is used as an anthelmintic in cattle for treatment of the following parasites: stomach worms (*Haemonchus, Trichostrongylus, Ostertagia*), intestinal worms (*Trichostrongylus, Cooperia, Nematodirus, Bunostomum, Oesophagostomum*) and lungworms (*Dictyocaulus*).
( 3 ) *Limitations.* Do not administer more than 10 milliliters per site. Cattle that are severely parasitized or maintained under conditions of constant helminth exposure may require re-treatment within 2 to 4 weeks after first treatment. Consult your veterinarian for assistance in the diagnosis, treatment, and control of parasitism. Consult your veterinarian before using in severely debilitated animals or animals under severe stress. Do not administer to cattle within 7 days of slaughter. Do not administer to dairy animals of breeding age.
[43 FR 20489, May 12, 1978, as amended at 43 FR 29289, July 7, 1978; 43 FR 60895, Dec. 29, 1978; 47 FR 10807, Mar. 12, 1982; 62 FR 61625, Nov. 19, 1997; 65 FR 61090, Oct. 16, 2000; 67 FR 63055, Oct. 10, 2002. Redesignated and amended at 79 FR 16191, Mar. 25, 2014; 83 FR 48946, Sept. 28, 2018; 84 FR 32992, July 11, 2019]
§ 186.1797 Sodium sulfate. ( a ) Sodium sulfate (Na2SO4, CAS Reg. No. 7757-82-6), also known as Glauber's salt, occurs naturally and exists as colorless crystals or as a fine, white crystalline powder. It is prepared by the neutralization of sulfuric acid with sodium hydroxide.
( b ) The ingredient is used as a constituent of paper and paperboard used for food packaging, and cotton and cotton fabric used for dry food packaging.
( c ) The ingredient is used at levels not to exceed good manufacturing practice in accordance with § 186.1(b)(1).
( d ) Prior sanctions for this ingredient different from the uses established in this section do not exist or have been waived.
[45 FR 6086, Jan. 25, 1980]
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.01


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" in the
Registration Statement on Form S-4 and related Prospectus of Corixa Corporation
for the registration of shares of its common stock and to the incorporation by
reference therein of our report dated February 3, 1999, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Corixa Corporation included in its Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1998, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

Seattle, Washington                                         ERNST & YOUNG LLP
June 29, 1999
Filed 12/20/02 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2002 ND 200

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Mario Domingo Hernandez, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20020123

Appeal from the District Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central Judicial District, the Honorable Karen Kosanda Braaten, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Kim Radermacher, Legal Intern and third-year law student, under the Rule on Limited Practice of Law by Law Students (argued), and Peter David Welte, Assistant State’s Attorney (appeared), P.O. Box 5607, Grand Forks, N.D. 58206-5607, for plaintiff and appellee.

Rebecca Jo Heigaard McGurran, Camrud, Maddock, Olson & Larson, P.O. Box 5849, Grand Forks, N.D. 58206-5849, for defendant and appellant.

State v. Hernandez

No. 20020123

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Mario Domingo Hernandez appealed from a criminal judgment entered upon his plea of guilty to gross sexual imposition.  Hernandez argues he should be allowed to withdraw his guilty plea because it was not voluntarily and knowingly made and because he received ineffective assistance of counsel.  We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).  The record on appeal does not disclose that counsel’s assistance was plainly defective.  A claim of ineffective assistance of counsel may be pursued in a post-conviction proceeding where an adequate record can be developed.  See State v. Weaver, 2002 ND 4, ¶ 28, 638 N.W.2d 30.

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Mary Muehlen Maring

William A. Neumann

Dale V. Sandstrom

Carol Ronning Kapsner