alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AFS-12-333-E 

June 29, 2012 

Mr. Omer ErSelcuk 

President/Chief Executive Officer 

Seaborne Virgin Islands, Inc., d.b.a. Seaborne Airlines 

1210 Watergut Street 

Christiansted, VI 00820 

Dear Mr. ErSelcuk: 

This is in response to your April 19, 2012, letter (public docket No. FAA-2010-0947) 

petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Seaborne Virgin Islands, 

Inc., d.b.a. Seaborne Airlines (Seaborne Airlines) for an extension of Exemption No. 10179, 

as amended, to June 30, 2013. That exemption from § 121.173(b)(2) and Appendix K, 

paragraph 5a, of part 121 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows Seaborne Airlines 

to continue to operate DHC-6-300 wheel-equipped airplanes after the December 20, 2010, 

effective date without meeting certain aircraft performance requirements. 

On September 8, 2011, The FAA published Type Certificate Data Sheet (TCDS) 

No. A9EA, Revision No. 14, for the Model DHC-6-300 (Normal Category) aircraft. This 

TCDS Revision 14 includes the commuter category performance requirements as specified 

by part 121, Appendix K, paragraph (5)(b). Therefore the wheel-equipped DHC-6-300 

aircraft for which this exemption applied are now able to comply with the requirements of 

part 121, Appendix K. These aircraft must now comply with part 121, Appendix K, 

paragraph 6. Operation. Further extension of Exemption No. 10179 is no longer required. 

For Model DHC-6-300 airplanes intended for operations in accordance with the performance 

limitations of § 121.189 through 121.197, the Airplane Flight Manual Supplement #37 – 

Supplemental Performance Data, is to be inserted in the Airplane Flight Manual, document 

PSM 1-63-1A and used to comply with part 121, Appendix K. 
2

Therefore, the FAA will take no further action on your petition and Docket No. FAA-2010-

0947 is being closed. 

Sincerely, 

/S/ 

Leslie Smith 

Acting Director, Flight Standards 

 Service 

Enclosure
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 12

- 00038

- CR

Edgar Alfredo Mata

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From Criminal District Court No. 3

o f Tarrant County (1231766D )

June 20 , 2013

P er C uriam

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
[No. 38631-0-I.

Division One.

November 3, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Joseph F. Baker, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Ska-git County, No. 95-1-00339-6, Michael E. Rickert, J., entered April 4, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Ellington, J., concurred in by Coleman and Becker, JJ. Now published at 89 Wn. App. 726.
EXHIBIT 11 - Statement Re:  Computation of Earnings Per Share
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                             Three Months Ended
                                                                March 31,
(In thousands)                                              1997          1996(1)
                                                            -------------------
<S>                                                         <C>           <C>   
Primary
    Average shares outstanding .....................        17,161        18,006
    Common stock equivalents:
        Net effect of the assumed
        exercise of stock options and
        stock warrants based on
        average market price .......................           377           453
                                                           -------       -------

Primary average shares .............................        17,538        18,459
                                                           =======       =======

Net income applicable to common
    shares .........................................       $ 3,956       $ 2,627

Primary net income per share .......................       $   .23       $   .14


Fully diluted
    Average shares outstanding .....................        17,161        18,006
    Common stock equivalents:
        Net effect of the assumed
        exercise of stock options and
        stock warrants based on end
        of period market price .....................           382           459
                                                           -------       -------

Fully diluted average shares .......................        17,543        18,465
                                                           =======       =======

Net income applicable to common
    shares .........................................       $ 3,956       $ 2,627

Fully diluted net income per share .................       $   .23       $   .14

<FN>

(1)   Share figures for 1996 have been restated for the 10% stock dividend
      issued in December 1996.
</TABLE>

                                      20
### Ground-water resources of Sheridan County, Wyoming

By: Marlin E. LowryT. Ray Cummings

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1807

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16D0479. EARL V. PARRISH v. THE STATE.

In 1997, Earl V. Parrish convicted of rape and sentenced to life in prison. His

conviction was affirmed on appeal. See Parrish v. State, 237 Ga. App. 274 (514

SE2d 458) (1999). Parrish subsequently filed an “Extraordinary Motion for New

Trial,” which the trial court denied in an order dated March 31, 2016. Parrish then

filed this application for discretionary appeal on July 26, 2016 seeking review of that

order. We, however, lack jurisdiction.

An application for discretionary appeal must be filed within 30 days of the

entry of the order or judgment to be appealed. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). The

requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional, and this Court cannot accept an

application for appeal made beyond 30 days. See Boyle v. State, 190 Ga. App. 734,

734 (380 SE2d 57) (1989). Here, Parrish filed his application 117 days after the trial

court's order was entered. Accordingly, the application is untimely and is hereby

DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

08/11/2016

August 11, 2016
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 71 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      February 9, 2005.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 418) to establish and rapidly implement regulations for State 
driver's license and identification document security standards, to prevent 
terrorists from abusing the asylum laws of the United States, to unify 
terrorism-related grounds for inadmissibility and removal, and to ensure 
expeditious construction of the San Diego border fence. The first reading of the 
bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the 
bill are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not 
exceed one hour and 40 minutes, with 40 minutes equally divided and controlled 
by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary; 
40 minutes equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority 
member of the Committee on Government Reform; and 20 minutes equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
Homeland Security. After general debate the Committee of the Whole shall rise 
without motion. No further consideration of the bill shall be in order except 
pursuant to a subsequent order of the House.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JANUARY 24, 2020

NO. 03-19-00822-CV

Kent-Shay Brown, Jr., Appellant

v.

Lacey Brown, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, KELLY, AND SMITH

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

Having reviewed the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal. 

Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. The appellant shall pay all 

costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**SEAN DONTAE MCKINLEY,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 386 WAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 1st day of December, 2015, the Petition for A llowance of Appeal** 

**is** DENIED

**.**
State of New York

Court of Appeals This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to 

revision before publication in the New York Reports.

No. 56 

The People &c.,

 Respondent,

 v.

Sergio Cerda, 

 Appellant.

Donna Aldea, for appellant.

Andrew Fakuda, for respondent.

Reargument ordered for a future Court session. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, 

Garcia, Wilson, Cannataro and Troutman concur. Judge Singas took no part.

Decided May 24, 2022
EXHIBIT 32
----------




                            CERTIFICATIONS OF
           CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                   PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                       SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
           ---------------------------------------------------



      The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be
deemed filed pursuant to any provision of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 or any other securities law:

      Each of the undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on
Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of ALP Liquidating Trust.




                                        /s/   Gary Nickele
                                        ------------------------------
                                        Gary Nickele
                                        Chief Executive Officer




                                        /s/   Gailen J. Hull
                                        ------------------------------
                                        Gailen J. Hull
                                        Chief Financial Officer and
                                        Principal Accounting Officer
Editorial Note on Part 15
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 15 appear at 88 FR 45065, July 14, 2023.

§ 15.20 Notice of a public hearing before the Commissioner. ( a ) If the Commissioner determines that a public hearing should be held on a matter, the Commissioner will publish a notice of hearing in the Federal Register setting forth the following information: ( 1 ) If the hearing is under § 15.1 (a) or (b), the notice will state the following: ( i ) The purpose of the hearing and the subject matter to be considered. If a written document is to be the subject matter of the hearing, it will be published as part of the notice, or reference made to it if it has already been published in the Federal Register, or the notice will state that the document is available from an agency office identified in the notice.
( ii ) The time, date, and place of the hearing, or a statement that the information will be contained in a subsequent notice.
( 2 ) If the hearing is in lieu of a formal evidentiary public hearing under § 15.1(c), all of the information described in § 12.32(e).
( b ) The scope of the hearing is determined by the notice of hearing and any regulation under which the hearing is held. If a regulation, e.g., § 330.10(a)(10), limits a hearing to review of an existing administrative record, information not already in the record may not be considered at the hearing.
( c ) The notice of hearing may require participants to submit the text of their presentations in advance of the hearing if the Commissioner determines that advance submissions are necessary for the panel to formulate useful questions to be posed at the hearing under § 15.30(e). The notice may provide for the submission of a comprehensive outline as an alternative to the submission of the text if the Commissioner determines that submission of an outline will be sufficient.
[44 FR 22366, Apr. 13, 1979, as amended at 47 FR 26375, June 18, 1982]
§ 520.1782 Pimobendan solution. ( a ) *Specifications.* Each milliliter of solution contains 1.5 milligrams (mg) pimobendan.
( b ) *Sponsor.* See No. 000010 in § 510.600(c) of this chapter.
( c ) *Conditions of use in dogs* — ( 1 ) *Amount.* Administer orally at a total daily dose of 0.23 mg/lb (0.5 mg/kg) body weight. The total daily dose should be divided into two equal portions administered approximately 12 hours apart (*i.e.,* morning and evening).
( 2 ) *Indications for use.* For the management of the signs of mild, moderate, or severe congestive heart failure in dogs due to clinical myxomatous mitral valve disease (MMVD) or dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM); for use with concurrent therapy for congestive heart failure (*e.g.,* furosemide, etc.) as appropriate on a case-by-case basis.
( 3 ) *Limitations.* Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian.
[89 FR 42357, May 15, 2024]
#### § 205.2 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to implement the Prescription Drug Marketing Act of 1987 by providing minimum standards, terms, and conditions for the licensing by State licensing authorities of persons who engage in wholesale distributions in interstate commerce of prescription drugs.
###### Editorial Note on Part 172

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 172 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; 70 FR 72074, Dec. 1, 2005; and 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

#### § 172.540 DL-Alanine.

DL-Alanine (a racemic mixture of D- and L-alanine; CAS Reg. No. 302-72-7) may be safely used as a flavor enhancer for sweeteners in pickling mixtures at a level not to exceed 1 percent of the pickling spice that is added to the pickling brine.

[56 FR 6968, Feb. 21, 1991]
### SERVED: July 8, 2015 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONR

# E

# cEI 

# vED OFFICE OF HEARINGS
.

WASHlNGTON, DC
JN THE MATTER OF FISHER SCIENTIFIC COMPANY, LLC DocketNo. FAA-2015- 1321 

## JUL

- 8 2015 HEARING DOCKET

ORDEREXTENDING TIME FOR FAA 

### TO RESPOND TO RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS The Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter "FAA'') tiled a Motion for Extension ofTime to respond to Fisher Scientific Company, LLC's (hereinafter "Fisher") "MOTIONS TO DISMISS COMPLAINT FOR INSUFFICIENCY AND FOR COMPLAINANT'S VIOLATION OF RULE 208" (hereinafter "Motion.'). Fisher has not yet responded. We do not anticipate reaching this case until on or after mid-December 20I5. WHEREFORE. it be and is hereby ORDERED the FAA 

### file a response to Fisher's Motion on orbefore August 7, 2015.

Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Attachment- Service ListSERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

### ORIGINAL & 

### ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1 

### ONE COPY Jeny W. Cox, Re.1pondent 's Counsel Counsel for Thermo Fisher Scientitlc, Inc.

and Fisher Scientific Co
.. LLC 2729 Gallows Rd., Suite 401 Vietma, VA 22180 TEL: 703-757-5866 Email: jcox@potomacstrategyassociates.com William Vines, Complainant's Counsel Office ofthe Regional Counsel, AS0-7 SouthernRegion 1701 Columbia Avenue College Park, GA 30337 TEL: 404-305-5200 FAX: 404-305-5223 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,Administrative Law Judge O!Iice ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington. DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 Docket No. FAA-2015-1321 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration. 600 Independence Avenue. S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-- Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591: Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.2
# L_2019137EN.01000101.xml

| 23.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 137/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 137/1

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2019/825

of 14 May 2019

on the conclusion on behalf of the Union of the Agreement between the European Union and the Government of the Republic of the Philippines on certain aspects of air services

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 100(2), in conjunction with Article 218(6)(a) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

Having regard to the consent of the European Parliament, (1)

Whereas:

| (1) | In accordance with Council Decision (EU) 2018/2003 (2), the Agreement between the European Union and the Government of the Republic of the Philippines on certain aspects of air services (the ‘Agreement’) has been signed, subject to its conclusion at a later date. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

In accordance with Council Decision (EU) 2018/2003 (2), the Agreement between the European Union and the Government of the Republic of the Philippines on certain aspects of air services (the ‘Agreement’) has been signed, subject to its conclusion at a later date.

| (2) | The Agreement should be approved on behalf of the Union, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Agreement should be approved on behalf of the Union,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Agreement between the European Union and the Government of the Republic of the Philippines on certain aspects of air services is hereby approved on behalf of the Union (3).

Article 2

The President of the Council shall, on behalf of the Union, give the notification provided for in Article 8(1) of the Agreement.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 14 May 2019.

For the Council

The President

P. DAEA

---

(1)  Consent of 16 April 2019.

1

(2)  Council Decision (EU) 2018/2003 of 20 September 2016 on the signing, on behalf of the Union, and provisional application of the Agreement between the European Union and the Government of the Republic of the Philippines on certain aspects of air services (OJ L 322, 18.12.2018, p. 1).

2

(3)  The text of the Agreement has been published in OJ L 322, 18.12.2018, p. 3, together with the decision on signature.

3

---
Editorial Note on Part 137
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 137 appear at 63 FR 14035, Mar. 24, 1998.

§ 137.175 Phosphated flour. Phosphated flour, phosphated white flour, and phosphated wheat flour, conform to the definition and standard of identity, and are subject to the requirements for label declaration of ingredients, prescribed for flour by § 137.105, except that: ( a ) Monocalcium phosphate is added in a quantity not less than 0.25 percent and not more than 0.75 percent of the weight of the finished phosphated flour; and
( b ) In determining whether the ash content complies with the requirements of this section allowance is made for the added monocalcium phosphate.
[42 FR 14402, Mar. 15, 1977, as amended at 58 FR 2877, Jan. 6, 1993]
FACT SHEET

For more information, visit CBP.gov or contact the Office of Public Affairs at 202-344-1770. Pub. #: 2103-1115 10/15

Secure Electronic Network for

Travelers Rapid Inspection (SENTRI)

Overview 

SENTRI was established to expedite the 

movement of eligible, prescreened, low-risk, 

pre-approved travelers on the southern border 

through designated dedicated vehicle traffic 

lanes. 

SENTRI members at the border are not 

regularly subjected to normal customs and 

immigration questioning. This helps reduce 

traffic congestion and delays that are costly 

to travelers while maintaining high levels of 

security at our land-border crossings.

Process

Applicants must voluntarily undergo a 

thorough criminal, law enforcement, customs, 

immigration, and terrorist background check; 

a 10-fingerprint law enforcement check; and 

a personal interview with a CBP officer.

SENTRI applicants may apply online using 

the global online enrollment system (GOES), 

and once the initial application is approved, the 

applicant will be required to present himself or 

herself (in person) for an interview at a SENTRI 

enrollment center. 

Enrollment is scheduled by appointment, 

which may be made online through one’s 

GOES account. Everyone crossing the border 

in a registered vehicle must apply, including 

children.

The cost for the program is $122.25 per person 

and is valid for five years.

Locations

Currently over 425,000 SENTRI members are 

using dedicated communter lanes at southern 

land-border crossings to enter the United States. 

SENTRI dedicated commuter lanes exist in 

El Paso, TX; San Ysidro, CA; Calexico, CA; 

Hidalgo, TX; Brownsville, TX; Anzalduas, 

TX; Laredo, TX; Otay Mesa, CA; Nogales, AZ; 

Douglas, AZ; and San Luis, AZ. n

Sentri