alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### OSCAR LONG et al., Respondents, v. THE GREENE COUNTY ABSTRACT & LOAN CO. et al., Appellants.

Springfield Court of Appeals,

November 2, 1909.

JURISDICTION: Supreme Court: In Action to Set Aside Deed of Trust on Grounds of Fraud in Procurement. In an action, ■which has for its object, in part, the setting aside of a deed of trust on real estate, on the grounds of want of consideration and fraud in its procurement, the title to real estate is involved and the appellate jurisdiction is in the Supreme Court.

Appeal from Greene Circuit Court (Division No. 2).— *Eon. Alfred*Page, Judge.

Certified to Supreme Court.

*W. B. Self*and *T. J. Murray*for appellants.

*Henry 0. Young*for respondents.

C'OX, J.

— This is an action which has for its object, m part, the setting aside of a deed of trust, covering certain real estate in the city of Springfield, on the ground that it was without consideration and fraudulently procured. Under the authority of the case of Overton v. Overton, 131 Mo. 559, this action involves title to real estate and must, therefore, be certified to the Supreme Court, which is accordingly done.

All concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS, AS
RESTATED, FOUND ON PAGES 2 OR 3 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE YEAR TO DATE
MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,440
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,400
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        539
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,296
<PP&E>                                           7,381
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,306
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  17,070
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,012
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        61,630
<OTHER-SE>                                    (53,323)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    17,070
<SALES>                                          3,985
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,985
<CGS>                                            2,142
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,142
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   916
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (51)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,600)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,600)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,600)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.17)
        

</TABLE>
S. 1182 

One Hundred Fifteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen 

An Act 

To extend the National Flood Insurance Program, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Flood Insurance Program Extension Act of 2018’’. 

SEC. 2. PROGRAM EXTENSION. 

(a) FINANCING.—Section 1309(a) of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4016(a)) is amended by striking ‘‘September 30, 2017’’ and inserting ‘‘November 30, 2018’’. 

(b) PROGRAM EXPIRATION.—Section 1319 of the National Flood 

Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4026) is amended by striking 

‘‘September 30, 2017’’ and inserting ‘‘November 30, 2018’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Editorial Note on Part 189
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 189 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; and 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005.

§ 189.110 Calamus and its derivatives. ( a ) Calamus is the dried rhizome of *Acorus calamus* L. It has been used as a flavoring compound, especially as the oil or extract.
( b ) Food containing any added calamus, oil of calamus, or extract of calamus is deemed to be adulterated in violation of the act based upon an order published in the Federal Register of May 9, 1968 (33 FR 6967).
( c ) The analytical method used for detecting oil of calamus (β-asarone) is in the “Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists,” Volume 56, (Number 5), pages 1281 to 1283, September 1973, which is incorporated by reference. Copies are available from the AOAC INTERNATIONAL, 481 North Frederick Ave., suite 500, Gaithersburg, MD 20877, also from the Office of Food Additive Safety (HFS-200), Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Food and Drug Administration, 5001 Campus Dr., College Park, MD 20740, 240-402-1200, or available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .*
[42 FR 14659, Mar. 15, 1977, as amended at 47 FR 11855, Mar. 19, 1982; 54 FR 24899, June 12, 1989; 78 FR 14667, Mar. 7, 2013]
566 P.2d 329

#### The STATE of Arizona, Petitioner, v. The Honorable John P. COLLINS, Judge of the Superior Court, Respondent, Bradley James REED, Real Party in Interest.

No. 2 CA-CIV 2588.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2.

June 16, 1977.

*529Stephen D. Neely, Pima County Atty. by Bruce Bridegroom, Deputy County Atty., Tucson, for petitioner.

John M. Neis, Pima County Public Defender by James Pray, Asst. Public Defender, Tucson, for Real Party in Interest.

OPINION

RICHMOND, Judge.

Did the respondent judge abuse his discretion in denying petitioner’s request that a juvenile witness be ordered to answer questions he had refused to answer on the ground he might incriminate himself? That is the question in this special action. We believe he did, and assume jurisdiction to grant relief.

On October 4, 1976, real party in interest Reed was accused of burglary, a violation of the terms of his probation, in Juvenile Cause No. 45596-1. On the same date, another juvenile was also accused of the same burglary, a violation of the terms of his probation, in Juvenile Cause No. 36723-1. Thereafter on January 27, 1977, Reed was found guilty of the burglary and, therefore, of having violated the terms of his probation.

On April 26, 1977, the other probationer’s hearing commenced. Reed was called to the stand as a witness for the state and after responding to some preliminary questions, refused to answer any questions pertaining to the burglary on the ground he might incriminate himself. The state requested that he be ordered to testify; it argued that he could not invoke his Fifth Amendment privilege since he had already been found guilty of the offense concerning which testimony was sought. The request was denied, and the state then made a written request, pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-1804, that Reed be granted immunity from the use of his testimony against him in any prosecution for an offense concerning which he was required to answer, and be ordered to answer the questions. This request was denied also.

We need not decide whether the immunity statute applies to a juvenile court proceeding,1 because once Reed was found guilty of the transaction in question, he was no longer able to claim the privilege of the Fifth Amendment and may be compelled to testify. *United States v. Hoffman,*385 F.2d 501 (7th Cir. 1967), cert. denied 390 U.S. 1031, 88 S.Ct. 1424, 20 L.Ed.2d 288; *United States v. Romero,*249 F.2d 371 (2d Cir. 1957); *see also Reina v. United States,*364 U.S. 507, 81 S.Ct. 260, 5 L.Ed.2d 249 (1960).

The order of the respondent court denying the state’s motion is set aside with directions to enter an appropriate order consistent with this opinion.

HOWARD, C. J., and HATHAWAY, J., concur.

1

. The statute applies to . . any criminal proceeding . . . It has been held in different circumstances “that the Legislature did not consider the proceedings in Juvenile Court ... to be criminal in nature . . . .” *Maricopa County Appeal No. J-68100 v. Haire,*107 Ariz. 309, 311, 486 P.2d 791 (1971).
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 211 (Tuesday, November 1, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 67529]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-28279]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7652]

U.S. National Commission for UNESCO Notice of Open Meeting

    The U.S. National Commission for UNESCO will hold a meeting in open 
session on Monday, November 28, 2011 from 10 a.m. to approximately 2 
p.m. E.S.T. The meeting will convene in room 310 of the George 
Washington University Marvin Center at 800 21st Street NW. in 
Washington, DC.
    This meeting will feature a series of speakers offering information 
about UNESCO and the current state of U.S. engagement with UNESCO. In 
addition, participants will be invited to form break-out groups to 
discuss possible programmatic ideas for the Commission. The meeting 
will also feature a public comment session where the Commission will 
accept brief oral comments or questions from the public or media. The 
public comment session will be limited to approximately 10 minutes in 
total, with 2 minutes allowed per speaker.
    For more information or to arrange to participate in this meeting 
(including requests for reasonable accommodation), individuals should 
contact Eric Woodard, Executive Director of the U.S. National 
Commission for UNESCO, Washington, DC 20037. Telephone (202) 663-0026; 
Fax (202) 663-0035; Email DCUNESCO@state.gov.

    Dated: October 21, 2011.
Eric Woodard,
Executive Director, U.S. National Commission for UNESCO, Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. 2011-28279 Filed 10-31-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-19-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 12/31/98
AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         998,510
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  183,963
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (9,533)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,293,357
<PP&E>                                         736,811
<DEPRECIATION>                                (93,767)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,614,602
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          411,059
<BONDS>                                      1,792,314
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,073
<OTHER-SE>                                     341,830
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,614,602
<SALES>                                        372,392
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               372,392
<CGS>                                          238,106
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  238,106
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               302,527
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             131,011
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (248,004)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,752
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (243,052)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 12,704
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (255,756)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.59)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.59)
        

</TABLE>
§ 186.1555 Japan wax. ( a ) Japan wax (CAS Reg. No. 8001-39-6), also known as Japan tallow or sumac wax, is a pale yellow vegetable tallow, containing glycerides of the C19-C23 dibasic acids and a high content of tripalmitin. It is prepared from the mesocarp by hot pressing of immature fruits of the oriental sumac, *Rhus succedanea* (Japan, Taiwan, and Indo-China), *R. vernicifera* (Japan), and *R. trichocarpa* (China, Indo-China, India, and Japan). Japan wax is soluble in hot alcohol, benzene, and naphtha, and insoluble in water and in cold alcohol.
( b ) In accordance with paragraph (b)(1) of this section, the ingredient is used as an indirect human food ingredient with no limitation other than current good manufacturing practice. The affirmation of this ingredient as generally recognized as safe (GRAS) as an indirect human food ingredient is based on the following current good manufacturing practice conditions of use: ( 1 ) The ingredient is used as a constituent of cotton and cotton fabrics used for dry food packaging.
( 2 ) The ingredient is used at levels not to exceed current good manufacturing practice.
( c ) Prior sanctions for this ingredient different from the uses established in this section do not exist or have been waived.
[60 FR 62208, Dec. 5, 1995]
---

---

Exhibit 14.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-102288 and 333-92491)
pertaining to the Employee Stock Option plans of Ellomay Capital Ltd. (the
Company) and Forms F-3 (File Nos. 333-144171, 333-115826, 333-114428, 333-47842 and
333-92493) of the Company and in the related Prospectuses of our report dated June 27,
2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Ellomay Capital Ltd. and
its subsidiaries included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December
31, 2007.

| |  | /s/ Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer
KOST FORER GABBAY& KASIERERA Member of Ernst & Young Global
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tel Aviv, IsraelJune  27,
2008



---

---
1

Alberto Gonzales has been appointed to serve as Attorney General of the

United States, and is substituted as respondent pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate

Procedure 43(c).

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 04-2036

___________

Roselor Jovial, *

*

Petitioner, *

*

v. * Petition for Review

* of an Order of the

Alberto Gonzales,1

 Attorney General * Board of Immigration Appeals.

of the United States, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Respondent. *

___________

Submitted: September 26, 2006

Filed: October 5, 2006

___________

Before RILEY, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Roselor Jovial (Jovial) petitions for review of an order of the Board of

Immigration Appeals (BIA), which affirmed without opinion an Immigration Judge’s

(IJ’s) denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention
2

Jovial presents no argument on appeal regarding the denial of CAT relief; thus,

we need not consider that claim. See Alyas v. Gonzales, 419 F.3d 756, 760 (8th Cir.

2005).

-2-

Against Torture (CAT).2

 Jovial argues she suffered past persecution based on political

opinion, as evidenced by her membership in the “Party Nationale for Democrat,” and

by Ronald Kadav (Kadav) breaking into her apartment. Kadav is allegedly a known

criminal who was a member of the Famni Lavalas party, the party of then-President

Jean-Bertrand Aristide. Jovial also disputes the IJ’s adverse credibility finding

regarding the home invasion.

We review the denial of asylum under the substantial evidence standard and

will uphold the BIA’s findings “unless the evidence ‘[is] so compelling that no

reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.’” See Vonhm

v. Gonzales, 454 F.3d 825, 828 (8th Cir. 2006) (quoting INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502

U.S. 478, 483-84 (1992)). This standard applies to the IJ’s findings where the BIA

issues a summary affirmance. See Dominguez v. Ashcroft, 336 F.3d 678, 680 (8th

Cir. 2003) (summary affirmance by BIA adopts decision of IJ).

We conclude the IJ’s finding that Jovial did not show she suffered past

persecution or had a well-founded fear of future persecution on account of a protected

ground is supported by substantial evidence. See Ngure v. Ashcroft, 367 F.3d 975,

990 (8th Cir. 2004) (noting isolated violence does not compel finding of persecution);

Hamzehi v. INS, 64 F.3d 1240, 1242 (8th Cir. 1995) (well-founded fear must be both

subjectively genuine and objectively reasonable). Jovial’s request for withholding of

removal also fails. See Regalado-Garcia v. INS, 305 F.3d 784, 788 (8th Cir. 2002)

(withholding of removal standard is more rigorous than asylum standard).

Accordingly, we deny the petition. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000945633
<NAME> UNITED STATIONERS SUPPLY CO.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> USD
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          19,038
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  213,242
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,775
<INVENTORY>                                    554,940
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               798,738
<PP&E>                                         267,967
<DEPRECIATION>                                  98,907
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,166,991
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          441,714
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,691
<OTHER-SE>                                     366,872
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,166,991
<SALES>                                      3,059,166
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,059,166
<CGS>                                        2,529,928
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,529,928
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               381,948
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,687
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              36,301
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                110,989
<INCOME-TAX>                                    47,064
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             63,925
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (5,907)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    58,018
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.60
        

</TABLE>
# EUR-Lex - 31992L0089 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31992L0089

**Commission Directive 92/89/EEC of 3 November 1992 amending Annex I to Fourth Directive 73/46/EEC establishing Community methods of analysis for the official control of feedingstuffs **

*
Official Journal L 344 , 26/11/1992 P. 0035 - 0037 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 46 P. 0039 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 46 P. 0039 *

COMMISSION DIRECTIVE 92/89/EEC of 3 November 1992 amending Annex I to Fourth Directive 73/46/EEC establishing Community methods of analysis for the official control of feedingstuffs

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 70/373/EEC of 20 July 1970 on the introduction of Community methods of sampling and analysis for the official control of feedingstuffs (1), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 3768/85 (2), and in particular Article 2 thereof,

Whereas Fourth Commission Directive 73/46/EEC (3), as amended by Directive 81/680/EEC (4), prescribes the method to be used for the determination of crude fibre;

Whereas there are grounds to adapt this method in the light of advances in scientific and technical knowledge; whereas it is advisable, in particular, to take account of the provisions of Council Directive 80/1107/EEC of 27 November 1980 on the protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to chemical, physical and biological agents at work (5), as amended by Directive 88/642/EEC (6), and, in particular, the measures taken to prevent exposure to asbestos;

Whereas it is from now on necessary to replace asbestos by glass containers in order to carry out the filtration procedures;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Directive are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee for Feedingstuffs,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:

Article 1

Annex I to Directive 73/46/EEC is amended in accordance with this Directive.

Article 2

Member States shall bring into force not later than 1 October 1993 the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with the provisions of this Directive. They shall forthwith inform the Commission thereof.

When Member States adopt these provisions, these shall contain a reference to this Directive or shall be accompanied by such reference at the time of their official publication. The procedure for such reference shall be adopted by the Member States.

Article 3

This Directive is addressed to the Member States. Done at Brussels, 3 November 1992. For the Commission

Ray MAC SHARRY

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 170, 3. 8. 1970, p. 2. (2) OJ No L 362, 31. 12. 1985, p. 8. (3) OJ No L 83, 30. 3. 1973, p. 21. (4) OJ No L 246, 29. 8. 1981, p. 32. (5) OJ No L 327, 3. 12. 1980, p. 8. (6) OJ No L 356, 24. 12. 1988, p. 74.

ANNEX

Annex I, point 3, 'Determination of crude fibre' is replaced by the following:

/* Tables: see OJ */