Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 192 / Wednesday, October 3, 2012 / Proposed Rules 60341 

Table 1, below, provides a summary 

of the annual 2002 emissions of PM2.5, 

PM10, SO2, NOX, VOCs, and NH3 for the 

Area submittal. 

TABLE 1—2002 ANNUAL EMISSIONS

[Tons per year] 

Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley Area 2002 PM2.5 PM10 SO2 NOX VOC NH3

Stationary Point Sources ......................................................................... 4868 11149 463501 110618 5157 462 

Area Sources ........................................................................................... 7916 41206 9905 8622 36683 2948 

Highway Vehicle Sources ........................................................................ 824 1164 1770 53268 25638 1884 

Non-Road Sources .................................................................................. 1297 1359 1694 25975 13421 8 

Totals ................................................................................................ 14904 54879 476871 198483 80898 5303 

The CAA section 172(c)(3) emissions 

inventory is developed by the 

incorporation of data from multiple 

sources. States were required to develop 

and submit to EPA a triennial emissions 

inventory according to the Consolidated 

Emissions Reporting Rule (CERR) for all 

source categories (i.e., point, area, 

nonroad mobile and on-road mobile). 

The review and evaluation of the 

methods used for the emissions 

inventory submitted by Pennsylvania 

are found in the Technical Support 

Document dated August 12, 2010 

available online at www.regulations.gov, 

Docket No. EPA–R03–OAR–2010–0601. 

EPA finds that the process used to 

develop this emissions inventory for the 

Area is adequate to meet the 

requirements of CAA section 172(c)(3), 

the implementing regulations, and EPA 

guidance for emission inventories. 

III. Proposed Action 

EPA is proposing to approve the 2002 

base year emissions inventory portion of 

the SIP revision submitted by the 

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania on 

November 10, 2009 for the PittsburghBeaver Valley Area. We have made the 

determination that this action is 

consistent with section 110 of the CAA. 

EPA is soliciting public comments on 

the issues discussed in this document. 

These comments will be considered 

before taking final action. 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely proposes to approve state law as 

meeting Federal requirements and does 

not impose additional requirements 

beyond those imposed by state law. For 

that reason, this proposed action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this proposed rule, 

pertaining to the PM2.5 2002 base year 

emissions inventory portion of the 

Pennsylvania SIP for the PittsburghBeaver Valley Area, does not have tribal 

implications as specified by Executive 

Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 

2000), because the SIP is not approved 

to apply in Indian country located in the 

state, and EPA notes that it will not 

impose substantial direct costs on tribal 

governments or preempt tribal law. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Nitrogen dioxide, 

Particulate matter, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur 

oxides, Volatile organic compounds. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Dated: September 18, 2012. 

W.C. Early, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region III. 

[FR Doc. 2012–24380 Filed 10–2–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 63 

[EPA–HQ–OAR–2008–0708, FRL–9736–7] 

RIN 2060–AQ58 

National Emission Standards for 

Hazardous Air Pollutants for 

Reciprocating Internal Combustion 

Engines; New Source Performance 

Standards for Stationary Internal 

Combustion Engines 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule; reopening of 

comment period. 

SUMMARY: The EPA is reopening the 

public comment period for the proposed 

amendments to the National Emission 

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants 

for Stationary Reciprocating Internal 

Combustion Engines to solicit comment 

on specific issues raised during the 

initial public comment period regarding 

existing engines on offshore vessels. 

DATES: Comments. Comments must be 

received on or before November 2, 2012. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– 

OAR–2008–0708, by one of the 

following methods: 


erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with 
60342 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 192 / Wednesday, October 3, 2012 / Proposed Rules 

1See document numbers EPA–HQ–OAR–2008– 

0708–0965 (comment from BHP Billiton 

Petroleum), EPA–HQ–OAR–2008–0708–1004 at p. 3 

(comment from Truck and Engine Manufacturers 

Association), EPA–HQ–OAR–2008–0708–1020 

(comment from Anadarko Petroleum Corporation), 

EPA–HQ–OAR–2008–0708–1071 (comment from 

Offshore Operators Committee), EPA–HQ–OAR– 

2008–0708–1105 at p. 6 (comment from American 

Petroleum Institute), and EPA–HQ–OAR–2008– 

0708–1145 at p. 2 (comment from Alaska Oil and 

Gas Association). 

• www.regulations.gov: Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

• Email: a-and-r-docket@epa.gov. 

• Fax: (202) 566–1741. 

• Mail: Air and Radiation Docket and 

Information Center, Environmental 

Protection Agency, Mailcode: 2822T, 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., 

Washington, DC 20460. Please include a 

total of two copies. The EPA requests a 

separate copy also be sent to the contact 

person identified below (see FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). 

• Hand Delivery: Air and Radiation 

Docket and Information Center, U.S. 

EPA, Room B102, 1301 Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC. Such 

deliveries are only accepted during the 

Docket’s normal hours of operation, and 

special arrangements should be made 

for deliveries of boxed information. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2008– 

0708. The EPA’s policy is that all 

comments received will be included in 

the public docket without change and 

may be made available online at 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through www.regulations.gov 

or email. The www.regulations.gov Web 

site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, 

which means the EPA will not know 

your identity or contact information 

unless you provide it in the body of 

your comment. If you send an email 

comment directly to the EPA without 

going through www.regulations.gov, 

your email address will be 

automatically captured and included as 

part of the comment that is placed in the 

public docket and made available on the 

Internet. If you submit an electronic 

comment, the EPA recommends that 

you include your name and other 

contact information in the body of your 

comment and with any disk or CD–ROM 

you submit. If the EPA cannot read your 

comment due to technical difficulties 

and cannot contact you for clarification, 

the EPA may not be able to consider 

your comment. Electronic files should 

avoid the use of special characters, any 

form of encryption and be free of any 

defects or viruses. 

Docket: All documents in the docket 

are listed in the www.regulations.gov 

index. The EPA also relies on 

documents in Docket ID Nos. EPA–HQ– 

OAR–2002–0059, EPA–HQ–OAR–2005– 

0029, EPA–HQ–OAR–2005–0030 and 

EPA–HQ–OAR–2010–0295, and 

incorporated those dockets into the 

record for this action. Although listed in 

the index, some information is not 

publicly available, e.g., CBI or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Certain other 

material, such as copyrighted material, 

will be publicly available only in hard 

copy. Publicly available docket 

materials are available either 

electronically in www.regulations.gov or 

in hard copy at the Air and Radiation 

Docket, EPA/DC, EPA West, Room 3334, 

1301 Constitution Ave. NW., 

Washington, DC. The Public Reading 

Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 

p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding 

legal holidays. The telephone number 

for the Public Reading Room is (202) 

566–1744, and the telephone number for 

the Air Docket is (202) 566–1742. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Melanie King, Energy Strategies Group, 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

(D243–01), Environmental Protection 

Agency, Research Triangle Park, North 

Carolina 27711; telephone number (919) 

541–2469; facsimile number (919) 541– 

5450; email address 

king.melanie@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 7, 

2012, the EPA published in the Federal 

Register the proposed rule, ‘‘National 

Emission Standards for Hazardous Air 

Pollutants for Reciprocating Internal 

Combustion Engines; New Source 

Performance Standards for Stationary 

Internal Combustion Engines’’ (77 FR 

33812). The June 7, 2012, action 

proposed to make specific amendments 

to the national emission standards for 

hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for 

stationary reciprocating internal 

combustion engines (RICE), as well as 

other regulations. The EPA received 

comments during the public comment 

period recommending that the RICE 

NESHAP be amended such that for any 

existing compression ignition (CI) RICE 

on offshore drilling vessels on the Outer 

Continental Shelf (OCS) that become 

subject to the RICE NESHAP as a result 

of the operation of the OCS regulations 

(40 CFR part 55), such engines may 

meet the NESHAP through management 

practices rather than numeric emission 

limits.1 This amendment was not 

contained or contemplated in the 

proposal that was published on June 7, 

2012. However, the comments indicate 

several significant issues related to 

application of the NESHAP to regulation 

of existing marine vessel engines 

located in the OCS as a result of the 

OCS regulations; in particular, whether 

the numerical standards applicable to 

other CI engines located at area sources 

(marine vessels located in the OCS are 

generally located at area sources) are 

technologically feasible for existing 

marine engines located in the OCS. 

Some commenters note specific 

technological issues relevant to engines 

on marine vessels in the OCS. 

Commenters suggest that, to the extent 

marine vessel engines become subject to 

the NESHAP as a result of the OCS 

regulations, they should be subject to 

generally available control technology 

(GACT) requirements that they believe 

are more appropriate for these types of 

engines. Given the significance of these 

issues, the EPA believes it is appropriate 

to request comment on these issues in 

the context of this rulemaking. 

The RICE NESHAP does not on its 

face apply to mobile sources, including 

marine vessels. However, OCS Air 

Regulations, codified at 40 CFR part 55, 

specify that vessels are OCS sources 

when they are (1) permanently or 

temporarily attached to the seabed and 

erected thereon and used for the 

purpose of exploring, developing or 

producing resources therefrom, within 

the meaning of section 4(a)(1) of the 

OCS Lands Act (43 U.S.C. § 1331, et 

seq.); or (2) physically attached to an 

OCS facility, in which case only the 

stationary sources aspects of the vessels 

will be regulated. 40 CFR 55.2. In 

addition, the OCS regulations provide 

that NESHAP requirements apply to a 

marine vessel that is an OCS source 

where the provisions are ‘‘rationally 

related to the attainment and 

maintenance of the Federal or State 

ambient air quality standards or the 

requirements of part C of title I of the 

Act.’’ 40 CFR 55.13(e). As a result, the 

commenters have requested that any 

marine vessel that becomes subject to 

the requirements of the RICE NESHAP 

as a result of the operation of 40 CFR 

part 55, be subject to maintenance-based 

management practices similar to those 

proposed for remote spark ignition (SI) 

engines, rather than the numerical 

emission limits otherwise applicable. 

The commenters indicated that these 

management practices are more 

appropriate as GACT for existing 

stationary CI RICE on vessels operating 

on the OCS. The management practices 

proposed for remote SI engines and 


erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with 
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 192 / Wednesday, October 3, 2012 / Proposed Rules 60343 

currently required in the rule for smaller 

CI engines include changing the oil and 

filter, inspecting the air cleaner or spark 

plugs and inspecting all hoses and belts 

within specified intervals. Facilities 

have the option of using an oil analysis 

program to extend the oil change 

requirement. The EPA requests 

comment on the information provided 

in the public comments regarding 

compliance by existing stationary CI 

RICE on vessels operating on the OCS 

with the current RICE NESHAP 

emission limits, in particular, the 

comments related to technological 

feasibility. 

How can I get copies of this document 

and other related information? 

The EPA has established a docket for 

the proposed rule, ‘‘National Emission 

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants 

for Reciprocating Internal Combustion 

Engines; New Source Performance 

Standards for Stationary Internal 

Combustion Engines’’ under Docket ID 

No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2008–0708, 

available at www.regulations.gov. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 63 

Environmental Protection, 

Administrative practice and procedure, 

Air pollution control, Hazardous 

substances, Intergovernmental relations, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Dated: September 25, 2012. 

Gina McCarthy, 

Assistant Administrator. 

[FR Doc. 2012–24379 Filed 10–2–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 64 

[CG Docket No. 02–278; Report No. 2962] 

Petition for Reconsideration of Action 

in Rulemaking Proceeding 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Petition for reconsideration. 

SUMMARY: In this document, Petitions 

for Reconsideration (Petitions) have 

been filed in the Commission’s 

Rulemaking proceeding by Kourtney 

Keough, President/CEO of Marketlink, 

Inc., on behalf of Marketlink, Inc., 

Michele A. Shuster, Esq. and Nicholas 

Whisler, Esq. for Mac Murray, Petersen 

& Shuster LLP, on behalf of Professional 

Association for Customer Engagement, 

and Anthony S. Mendoza, Esq. on 

behalf of SatCom Marketing, LLC. 

DATES: Oppositions to the Petitions 

must be filed on or before October 18, 

2012. Replies to an opposition must be 

filed on or before October 29, 2012. 

DATES: Federal Communications 

Commission, 445 12th Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20554. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Karen F. Johnson, Consumer and 

Governmental Affairs Bureau, Consumer 

Policy Division, at (202) 418–7706 

(voice), or email Karen.Johnson@fcc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a 

summary of Commission’s document, 

Report No. 2962, released September 24, 

2012. The full text of this document is 

available for viewing and copying in 

Room CY–B402, 445 12th Street SW., 

Washington, DC or may be purchased 

from the Commission’s copy contractor, 

Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI) (1– 

800–378–3160). The Commission will 

not send a copy of this Notice pursuant 

to the Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A), because this Notice 

does not have an impact on any rules of 

particular applicability. 

Subject: Marketlink, Inc.’s Petition for 

Reconsideration and Amendment; Rules 

and Regulations Implementing the 

Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 

1991, Professional Association for 

Customer Engagement’s Petition for 

Reconsideration; and Rules and 

Regulations Implementing the 

Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 

1991, Petition for Reconsideration of 

SatCom Marketing LLC, Report and 

Order, published at 77 FR 34233, June 

11, 2012, in CG Docket No. 02–278 and 

published pursuant to 47 CFR 1.429(e) 

of the Commission’s rules. See also 47 

CFR 1.4(b)(1) of the Commission’s rules. 

Number of Petitions Filed: 3. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Bulah P. Wheeler, 

Associate Secretary, Office of the Secretary, 

Office of Managing Director. 

[FR Doc. 2012–24406 Filed 10–2–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

GENERAL SERVICES 

ADMINISTRATION 

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND 

SPACE ADMINISTRATION 

48 CFR Part 53 

[FAR Case 2011–018; Docket 2011–0018; 

Sequence 1] 

RIN 9000–AM30 

Federal Acquisition Regulation; 

Positive Law Codification of Title 41 

Correction 

In proposed rule document 2012– 

21874, appearing on pages 57950–57979 

in the issue of Monday, September 18, 

2012, make the following correction: 

1. PART 53–FORMS will be printed 

in its entirety, beginning at § ‘‘53.301.25 

Performance Board’’, on page 57979. 


erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with