alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### South *v.*Parish.

[No. 17,157.

Filed November 19, 1943.]

*176
      *Charles M. Clark*and *Robert I. Marsh,*both of Indianapolis, for appellant.

*Robley E. George*and *Robert L. Carrico,*both of Indianapolis, for appellee.

Draper, J.

The appellant was adjudged to be the father of a child born out of wedlock and required to pay certain sums for its care and support, pursuant to the provisions of Acts 1941, ch. 112 (§ 3-623, et seq., Burns’ 1933 (Supp.)). He filed his motion for new hearing which was overruled and he attempts to appeal thérefrom to this court. Chapter 112, § 18 of the act (§ 3-640, Burns’ 1933 Supp.) provides that the procedure on appeal shall in most respects be the same as is provided for by law and rules for appeal in civil cases.

The overruling of appellant’s motion for new hearing is not assigned as error, nor is any error properly assigned. Although appellant attempts to question the sufficiency of the evidence, the transcript contains no properly certified bill of exceptions containing it. No marginal notations whatever have been made on the margin of the pages of the transcript in compliance *177with Rule 2-5 of the 1940 Revision of the Rules of the Supreme Court. Subdivisions (d), (e) and (f) of Rule 2-17 are not complied with, and the greater and more vital portions of the evidence have been completely omitted from appellant’s condensed recital thereof. Other omissions have been called to our attention, but it will be unnecessary to notice them;

The appellant has not properly presented any question to this court .and the judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

Note. — Reported in 51 N. E. (2d) 397.
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32 (A)

      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northland Cable Properties Seven
Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10Q for the period ended June
30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Form 10-Q"), I, John Whetzell, Chief Executive Officer of Northland
Communications Corporation, the General Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that;

         (1)      The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13 (a) or (15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
                  U.S.C. 78m or 78(d)); and

         (2)      The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Partnership.




DATE: 8-16-04

/s/ JOHN S. WHETZELL
    -----------------------------------
    John S. Whetzell
    Chief Executive Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Northland Cable Properties Seven Limited Partnership and will be
retained by Northland Cable Properties Seven Limited Partnership and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Web-Based Hurricane 

Evacuation System

EMERGENCY MANAGER DECISION 

SUPPORT PLATFORM

The National Hurricane Program’s Technology 

Modernization effort includes the creation of a web-based 

decision support platform targeted to state, local, and 

tribal emergency managers. This platform, known as 

Web-Based HURREVAC (hvx.hurrevac.com), was 

funded by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) 

Science and Technology Directorate (S&T) and built as 

an open source platform to enable emergency managers 

to access system capabilities on any device. 

WEB APP ADVANTAGES 

Delivering web-based hurricane evacuation planning and 

decision-making capabilities provides distinct advantages 

over Windows-only desktop legacy applications:

■ No installation required, and no executable file is

copied to your machine. Any emergency manager with

a modem web browser can use the system.

■ No administrator privileges needed

■ The system is available from any device capable of

running an internet browser such as Chrome or

Firefox, Edge or Internet Explorer.

■ Flexible design supports popular web standards and

can easily ingest a variety of products for map display. 

WEB APP CONSIDERATIONS

S&T developed the system to allow access to key 

information products even when the user’s internet 

connection is down or unreliable. Even though web apps 

do not have full access to the storage capabilities of the 

user’s machine, the system takes advantage of a variety 

of browser mechanisms for saving data locally. New 

products and features are continuing to be integrated into 

the system, such as: Tools for creating/editing exercise 

storms for training, adaptive risk profiles, and full 

Hurricane Evacuation System (HES) integration.

ONLINE CAPABILITIES

When a stable internet connection is available, users can 

access a wide variety of information products, including: 

■ Current and archived storms (all products)

■ Live weather conditions

■ Evacuation zones, clearance time tables, timing

guidance, and studies

■ High-quality base maps

■ Integrated training

■ Storm Surge Explorer with new high-resolution grids

OFFLINE EXPERIENCES

When the internet is lost during an active storm, the 

system will continue to provide access to previously 

downloaded data. This includes current and previous 

storm tracks, wind rings, wind swath and text advisories. 

These key products will allow the user to visualize and 

analyze data for the currently active threat.

Contact Us: first.responder@hq.dhs.gov scitech.dhs.gov dhsscitech 

02-2020
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) Comments on the Interagency Science Consultation Draft IRIS Assessment of tert - Butanol (dated September 2014) Date: November 21, 2014

November 20 , 2014 Interagency Review ( Step 3 ) of EPA IRIS Toxicological Review of tert
- Butanol

Dear EPA IRIS: Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on the draft Toxicological Review of tert
- Butanol

. We have comments on both the Preamble and the dose

- response assessment
. Preamble Comments As noted in the comments on the Preamble for ETBE and RDX, t here are statements in the Preamble that amount to policy positions or decisions rather than scientific ones. Those comments are not reproduced here, but should be considere d as part of this record.
• For consistency with RDX and ETBE, the page numbers should be lower case Roman numerals (the Preamble begins in lower case Roman numerals, but then switches to Arabic numerals)

. Primary Comments

• Confusion regarding α 2μ - globulin:
o p.ES

- 1, lines 30

- 32: “Mode of action analysis determined that male rat kidney effects were not mediated by α 2u - globulin, and these effects are concluded to be relevant for human health hazard assessment.”
o p.ES

- 2, lines 16

- 18: “Mode of action analysis dete rmined that male rat kidney effects were not mediated by α 2u - globulin, and these effects are concluded to be relevant for human health hazard assessment.”
o p.ES

- 5, lines 17

- 20: “ Because the available data supports the occurrence of at least two of the subsequent steps in the pathological sequence, these data are sufficient to conclude that α2u

- globulin nephropathy is occurring in the kidney of male rats following tert
- butanol exposure. Thus, the noncancer lesions associated with α2u

- globuli n nephropathy are not considered relevant to humans. ”

• Table 2

- 6: please demarcate which rows (candidate values) are based off of a subchronic inhalation study or route

- to
- route extrapolation from a chronic drinking water study. Comments on Charge to the SAB

• Follow

- up to question 3 e : Has EPA presented sufficient justification for deriving an oral slope factor and an inhalation unit risk when the cancer descriptor of “suggestive evidence” was concluded?
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7402

RICHARD ALLEN PULLY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

E. MONTGOMERY TUCKER, Chairman of Virginia

Parole Board,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-97-875-2)

Submitted: December 11, 1997 Decided: December 31, 1997

Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Allen Pully, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court's

order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint under

28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. Pully v. Tucker, No. CA-97-875-2 (E.D. Va. Sept.

26, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the annual report of SBH ASSOCIATES, INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brent A. Beecham, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: October 7, 2016 By: /s/BRENT A. BEECHAM Brent A. Beecham Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 99.1

 

 

**ANNUAL SERVICER’S CERTIFICATE**

 

**TARGET NATIONAL BANK**

 

**TARGET CREDIT CARD MASTER TRUST**

 

 

Theundersigned, a duly authorized representative of Target National Bank, asServicer, pursuant to the Amended and Restated Pooling and Servicing Agreementdated as of April 28, 2000, as supplemented by the Series 2002-1 Supplement,dated as of July 2, 2002 and the Series 2005-1 Supplement, dated as of November9, 2005 (as amended and supplemented from time to time, the

“Agreement”), among TargetReceivables Corporation, as Transferor, Target National Bank, as Servicer, andWells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee, does hereby certify that:

 

 

1.             Target National Bank is, as of thedate hereof, the Servicer under the Agreement. Capitalized terms used in thisCertificate have their respective meanings as set forth in the Agreement.

 

2.             The undersigned is a ServicingOfficer who is duly authorized pursuant to the Agreement to execute and deliverthis certificate to the Trustee.

 

3.             A review of the activities of theServicer during the fiscal year ended December 30, 2006, and of its performanceunder the Agreement was conducted under my supervision.

 

4.             Based on such review, the Servicerhas, to the best of my knowledge, performed in all material respects itsobligations under the Agreement throughout such year and no default in the performanceof such obligations has occurred or is continuing except as set forth inparagraph 5 below.

 

5.             The following is a description ofeach default in the performance of the Servicer’s obligations under theprovisions of the Agreement known to me to have been made by the Servicer duringthe fiscal year ended December 30, 2006 which sets forth in detail (i) thenature of each default, (ii) the action taken by the Servicer, if any, toremedy each such default and (iii) the current status of each such default:None.

 

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate as of the 21stday of March, 2007.

 
| ** ** | ** ** | ** ** | ** **                                        | **TARGET NATIONAL BANK,**                |
|------------|------------|------------|---------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
| ** ** | ** ** | ** ** | ** **                                        | **as Servicer,**                         |
| ** ** | ** ** | ** ** | ** **                                        | ** **                               |
| ** ** | ** ** | ** ** | ** **                                        | ** **                               |
| ** ** | ** ** | ** ** | **By:   ****/s/  Angela G. Jenks** |                                     |
|       |       |       |                                              | **Name: Angela G. Jenks**                |
|       |       |       |                                              | **Title: Vice President &  Cashier** |
|            |            |            |                                                   |                                          |  |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           5,889
<SECURITIES>                                     5,874
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,763
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,460
<PP&E>                                           6,576
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,872
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,797
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,270
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            52
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,465
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,797
<SALES>                                         13,092
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,431
<CGS>                                            2,506
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,705
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,054
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,217
<INCOME-TAX>                                       820
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,397
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,397
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .25


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 184
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 184 appear at 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; and 81 FR 49897, July 29, 2016.

§ 184.1210 Calcium oxide. ( a ) Calcium oxide (CaO, CAS Reg. No. 1305-78-8) is also known as lime, quick lime, burnt lime, or calx. It is produced from calcium carbonate, limestone, or oyster shells by calcination at temperatures of 1,700-2,450 °F.
( b ) The ingredient meets the specifications of the Food Chemicals Codex, 3d Ed. (1981), p. 55, which is incorporated by reference. Copies are available from the National Academy Press, 2101 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20418, or available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .*
( c ) In accordance with § 184.1(b)(1), the ingredient is used in food with no limitation other than current good manufacturing practice.
( d ) Prior sanctions for this ingredient different from the uses established in this section do not exist or have been waived.
[49 FR 26714, June 29, 1984]
#### In the Matter of Frank Williams, Appellant, v New York State of Parole, Respondent.

Judgment unanimously affirmed (see *Matter of Russo v New York State Bd. of Parole,*50 NY2d 69).(Appeal from judgment of Cayuga Supreme Court—art 78.) Present—Cardamone, J. P., Simons, Hancock, Jr., Callahan and Moule, JJ.
§ 520.1720b Phenylbutazone granules. ( a ) *Specifications.* Each package of granules contains 1 or 8 grams of phenylbutazone.
( b ) *Sponsors.* See sponsors in § 510.600(c) of this chapter. ( 1 ) No. 000061 for 8-gram package.
( 2 ) No. 059320 for 1-gram package.
( c ) *Conditions of use in horses* — ( 1 ) *Amount.* Administer 1 to 2 grams per 500 pounds of body weight, not to exceed 4 grams, daily as required. by adding to a portion of the usual grain ration.
( 2 ) *Indications for use.* For the treatment of inflammatory conditions associated with the musculoskeletal system.
( 3 ) *Limitations.* Do not use in horses intended for human consumption. Federal law prohibits the use of this drug in female dairy cattle 20 months of age or older. Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian.
[78 FR 28826, May 20, 2014]
§ 516.157 Publication of the index and content of an index listing. ( a ) FDA will make the list of indexed drugs available through the FDA Web site at *http://www.fda.gov .* A printed copy can be obtained by writing to the Freedom of Information Staff or by visiting FDA's Freedom of Information Staff's Public Reading Room at the address listed on the Agency's Web site at *http://www.fda.gov .*
( b ) The list will contain the following information for each indexed drug: ( 1 ) The name and address of the person who holds the index listing;
( 2 ) The name of the drug and the intended use and conditions of use for which it is indexed;
( 3 ) Product labeling; and
( 4 ) Conditions and any limitations that FDA deems necessary regarding use of the drug.
[72 FR 69121, Dec. 6, 2007; 76 FR 31470, June 1, 2011, as amended at 79 FR 68115, Nov. 14, 2014]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                          11,725
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   83,181
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,884)
<INVENTORY>                                     63,040
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               179,536
<PP&E>                                          79,307
<DEPRECIATION>                                (35,716)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 247,173
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          121,533
<BONDS>                                        123,364
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           193
<OTHER-SE>                                         311
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   247,173
<SALES>                                        129,158
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               129,158
<CGS>                                           88,307
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   88,307
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                21,409
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,004
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,438
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,715
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,700
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,700
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.54


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7352 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7352

To prohibit States from prohibiting or otherwise deterring the usage of 
      any merchant category code established by the International 
Organization for Standardization, including codes that identify firearm 
                  merchants and ammunition merchants.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 14, 2024

 Mr. Frost (for himself, Mr. Horsford, Ms. Kelly of Illinois, and Mr. 
  Moskowitz) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit States from prohibiting or otherwise deterring the usage of 
      any merchant category code established by the International 
Organization for Standardization, including codes that identify firearm 
                  merchants and ammunition merchants.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Identify Gun Stores Act''.

SEC. 2. PREEMPTION RELATING TO MERCHANT CATEGORY CODES.

    Section 5313 of title 31, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting after subsection (g) the following:
    ``(h) Merchant Category Code Usage.--
            ``(1) In general.--No State may prohibit or otherwise deter 
        the usage of any merchant category code established by the 
        International Organization for Standardization, including codes 
        that identify firearm merchants and ammunition merchants.
            ``(2) Enforcement.--The Attorney General may bring a civil 
        action in the appropriate district court to enforce this 
        subsection.''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.04

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" in the
Registration Statement (Form S-4) and related Proxy Statement/Prospectus of
Corixa Corporation for the registration of 4,716,860 shares of its common stock
and to the incorporation by reference therein of our report dated January 28,
1998 except for Note 9, as to which the date is February 28, 1998 with respect
to the financial statements of GenQuest Inc. included in Corixa Corporation's
dated August 9, 1999 Current Report on Form 8-K of filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.


Seattle, Washington                                        ERNST & YOUNG LLP
August 11, 1999