In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS 

No. 14-1059V 

Filed: February 3, 2016 

UNPUBLISHED 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

VALERIE C. DOBBINS, * 

 * 

 Petitioner, * Joint Stipulation on Damages; 

 * Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccination; 

 * Guillain-Barre Syndrome (“GBS”); 

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Special Processing Unit (“SPU”) 

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * 

 * 

 Respondent. * 

 * 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

Nancy Routh Meyers, Ward Black Law, Greensboro, NC, for petitioner. 

Althea Walker Davis, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. 

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master: 

 On October 30, 2014, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,

2 [the 

“Vaccine Act”]. Petitioner alleges that she suffered Guillain Barre Syndrome as the 

result on her influenza (“flu”) vaccination on October 30, 2013. Petition, ¶ 15; 

Stipulation, filed February 1, 2016, ¶¶ 2, 4. Petitioner further alleges that she suffered 

the residual effects of her injury for more than six months, and that she has received no 

prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages as a result of her injury. Petition, 

¶¶ 18, 20; Stipulation, ¶¶ 4-5. “Respondent denies that the flu vaccine caused 

petitioner’s Guillain-Barre Syndrome or any other injury or her current condition.” 

Stipulation, ¶ 6. 

Nevertheless, on February 1, 2016, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation, 

stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. The undersigned 

 

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the 

undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with 

the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012)(Federal Management and Promotion of 

Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to 

identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits 

within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012). 
2

finds the stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding 

damages, on the terms set forth therein. 

The parties stipulated that petitioner shall receive the following compensation: 

A lump sum of $175,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. 

Stipulation, ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages 

that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Id. 

The undersigned approves the requested amount for petitioner’s compensation. 

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of 

the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/Nora Beth Dorsey 

 Nora Beth Dorsey 

 Chief Special Master 

 

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice 

renouncing the right to seek review. 
Case 1:14-vv-01059-UNJ Document 27 Filed 02/01/16 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:14-vv-01059-UNJ Document 27 Filed 02/01/16 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:14-vv-01059-UNJ Document 27 Filed 02/01/16 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:14-vv-01059-UNJ Document 27 Filed 02/01/16 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:14-vv-01059-UNJ Document 27 Filed 02/01/16 Page 5 of 5