alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000946323
<NAME>                        MIDWAY AIRLINES CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          58,248  
<SECURITIES>                                         0  
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,272  
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (1,624) 
<INVENTORY>                                      2,916  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                79,155  
<PP&E>                                         113,800  
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (10,793) 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 203,581  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,275  
<BONDS>                                         79,821  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0  
<PREFERRED>                                          0  
<COMMON>                                            86  
<OTHER-SE>                                      70,377  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   203,581  
<SALES>                                              0  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               211,439  
<CGS>                                                0  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  185,308  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (1,972) 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 24,159  
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,178  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,981  
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0  
<CHANGES>                                            0  
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,981  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.75  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.54  
                                               

</TABLE>
§ 26.46 Listing of additional CAB's. ( a ) During the operational period, additional conformity assessment bodies (CAB's) will be considered for equivalence using the procedures and criteria described in §§ 26.36, 26.37, and 26.39, taking into account the level of confidence gained in the overall regulatory system of the other party.
( b ) Once a designating authority considers that such CAB's, having undergone the procedures of §§ 26.36, 26.37, and 26.39, may be determined to be equivalent, it will then designate those bodies on an annual basis. Such procedures satisfy the procedures of § 26.66(a) and (b).
( c ) Following such annual designations, the procedures for confirmation of CAB's under § 26.66(c) and (d) shall apply.
Exhibit 32.1  Certification of CEO

CERTIFICATIONS

I, James R. Arabia, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB-A of Naturewell,
Incorporated;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

     a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

     b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)  presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):

     a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls;
and

6.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  October 20, 2003                /s/ James R .Arabia
                                       -------------------
                                           James R .Arabia
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer

_______________________________________________________________________________
Exhibit 31.2
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Phyllis A. Knight, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of ChampionEnterprises, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have;
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: October 25, 2004 /s/ PHYLLIS A. KNIGHT  Phyllis A. Knight Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
#### § 225.158 Laboratory assays.

Where the results of laboratory assays of drug components, including assays by State feed control officials, indicate that the medicated feed is not in accord with the permissible limits specified in this chapter, investigation and corrective action shall be implemented immediately by the firm and such records shall be maintained on the premises for a period of 1 year.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,467
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   85,547
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,972
<INVENTORY>                                     65,912
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               180,512
<PP&E>                                         129,929
<DEPRECIATION>                                  64,783
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 286,047
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           59,883
<BONDS>                                         62,340
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           113
<OTHER-SE>                                     160,908
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   286,047
<SALES>                                        274,240
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               274,240
<CGS>                                          150,802
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  150,802
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   951
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,842
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,373
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,660
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,713
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,713
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.29
        

</TABLE>
#### § 520.1263 Lincomycin.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7399 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7399

  To terminate the American Community Survey, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 15, 2024

   Mr. Van Drew (for himself, Mr. Duncan, and Mr. Smith of Nebraska) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                      Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To terminate the American Community Survey, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``American Community Survey 
Elimination Act'' or the ``ACSE Act''.

SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY.

    The Secretary of Commerce or the Bureau of the Census may not carry 
out the American Community Survey, and no Federal funds may be 
obligated or expended to carry out such Survey (or any similar survey).
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0023 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. MARK FOLLWEILER,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including June 2 6, 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Beth Baker Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 18 2023

05/18/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0023
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 37 (Thursday, February 25, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8743-8744]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3858]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLCAC00000 L07770900 XZ0000]


Notice of Public Meeting of the Central California Resource 
Advisory Council

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972, the U.S. Department of 
the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Central California 
Resource Advisory Council (RAC) will meet as indicated below.

DATES: The meeting will be held Friday, April 9, at the BLM Bakersfield 
Field Office, 3801 Pegasus Drive, Bakersfield, CA, beginning at 9 a.m. 
The RAC Off-Highway Vehicle Subgroup will meet briefly before the full 
RAC meeting to

[[Page 8744]]

vote on whether to present screening criteria for land acquisitions for 
off-highway vehicle use to the full RAC. Time for public comment is 
reserved from 1 p.m. to 2 p.m.
    On April 10, RAC members will participate in the National Landscape 
Conservation System 10th Anniversary event at Carrizo Plain National 
Monument.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: BLM Central California District 
Manager Kathy Hardy, (916) 978-4626; or BLM Public Affairs Officer 
David Christy, (916) 941-3146.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 12-member council advises the Secretary 
of the Interior, through the BLM, on a variety of planning and 
management issues associated with public land management in Central 
California. At this meeting, agenda topics will include an update on 
the resource management plans for the Carrizo Plain National Monument 
and the BLM Bakersfield Field Office. Additional ongoing business will 
be discussed by the council. All meetings are open to the public. 
Members of the public may present written comments to the council. Each 
formal council meeting will have time allocated for public comments. 
Depending on the number of persons wishing to speak, and the time 
available, the time for individual comments may be limited. The meeting 
and Carrizo event are open to the public, but reservations are required 
for the Carrizo event. Individuals who plan to attend and need special 
assistance, such as sign language interpretation and other reasonable 
accommodations, should contact the BLM as provided above.

    Dated: February 18, 2010.
David Christy,
Public Affairs Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-3858 Filed 2-24-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-P
p.1 

OAR Box 1796 

Prepped by Keeia Richards 

Document Number: 

23) IV-H-46 

Docket Number: 

A-90-37 

Printed 10/31/2008 4:20:37PM Sheet 23 of 107 
P.2 

Jeff Holmstead 

11/12/2002 10:03 PM 

A-90-37 

To: jgraham@omb.eop.gov IV-H-46 

cc: pnoe@omb.eop.gov, afraas@omb.eop.gov, Bi 

Wehaim/DC/USEPMJS@EPA, Bill Hamett/Ri r/u3bPAAJS@EPA 

Subject: Interagency Review of NSR Rules 

As you know, we normally expect that interagency review of EPA rules will take no longer than 90 days. 

However, because of the number of complex issues presented by the NSR rules currently under review, 

we believe that additional time beyond the normal 90-day period is warranted. I would therefore like to 

request that the interagency review period for both NSR packages be extended until December 1st. 

W 2 2 2002 

EPA AIR DOCKET
<PAGE>


                                                                     EXHIBIT 11


                             ALTRIS SOFTWARE, INC.

            STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
                                  (Unaudited)
                                  (Restated)

   
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        For the three months
                                                           ended March 31,
                                                      --------------------------
                                                         1997           1996
                                                      -----------    -----------
<S>                                                   <C>            <C>
Net loss per consolidated financial statements        $(1,600,000)   $(1,117,000)

Primary net loss per share:
Weighted average common shares                          9,565,000      9,027,000
Common stock equivalents:
 Common stock options                                           -              -
                                                      -----------    -----------
Weighted average shares outstanding                     9,565,000      9,027,000
                                                      -----------    -----------
                                                      -----------    -----------
Fully diluted net loss per share:
Weighted average common shares                          9,565,000      9,027,000
Common stock equivalents:
 Common stock options                                           -              -
                                                      -----------    -----------
Weighted average shares outstanding                     9,565,000      9,027,000
                                                      -----------    -----------
                                                      -----------    -----------
Net loss per share
 Primary                                                  $  (.17)       $  (.12)
                                                      -----------    -----------
                                                      -----------    -----------
 Fully diluted                                            $  (.17)       $  (.12)
                                                      -----------    -----------
                                                      -----------    -----------
</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-60485

Summary Calendar

Maswin Sukotjo, 

Petitioner,

versus

Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, 

Respondent.

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A096 274 197

Before Southwick, Oldham, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Maswin Sukotjo, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review 

of the denial of his February 2020 motion for reconsideration and reopening, 

which the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denied in May 2020. He 

argues only that the BIA abused its discretion by (1) failing to address 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 11, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-60485 Document: 00515974833 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/11/2021
No. 20-60485

2

equitable tolling arguments that he made exclusively in a July 2019 motion to 

reopen, which the BIA denied in January 2020, and (2) denying the July 2019 

motion.

Sukotjo’s June 2020 petition for review was timely only with respect 

to the BIA’s May 2020 decision. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1). Satisfying the 

deadline for filing a petition for review is mandatory and jurisdictional. Stone 

v. INS, 514 U.S. 386, 405-06 (1995). Since Sukotjo did not raise any equitable 

tolling arguments in the February 2020 motion presently under review, and 

since he did not timely petition for review of the BIA’s January 2020 

decision, we lack jurisdiction to consider his arguments. See Kane v. Holder, 

581 F.3d 231, 237 & n.14 (5th Cir. 2009). 

Sukotjo does not identify any error in the BIA’s denial of his February 

2020 motion for reconsideration and reopening. Accordingly, he has waived 

any argument that the BIA erred in denying that motion by failing to brief it 

adequately. See Sharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 411 n.1 (5th Cir. 2013).

The petition for review is DISMISSED IN PART for lack of 

jurisdiction and DENIED IN PART. 

Case: 20-60485 Document: 00515974833 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/11/2021
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-11-000073628-MAR-201308:36 AM
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7242 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7242

  To amend the Small Business Act to increase the maximum gross loan 
         amount for a loan made under section 7(a) of such Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 5, 2024

 Mr. Thanedar introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Small Business Act to increase the maximum gross loan 
         amount for a loan made under section 7(a) of such Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Loans in our Neighborhoods Act''.

SEC. 2. MAXIMUM GROSS LOAN AMOUNT FOR A 7(A) LOAN.

    Section 7(a)(3)(A) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 
636(a)(3)(A)) is amended by striking ``$5,000,000'' and inserting 
``$10,000,000''.
                                 <all>
```