alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       9,928,141
<SECURITIES>                                   228,905
<RECEIVABLES>                                   74,214
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,459,985
<PP&E>                                       2,502,623
<DEPRECIATION>                               (228,337)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,734,271
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           40,349
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    18,178,652
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,734,271
<SALES>                                         68,499
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               133,626
<CGS>                                           32,801
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   32,801
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               191,515
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (90,690)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (90,690)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2



                         Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Smartflex systems, Inc. of our report dated January 24, 1998, included in the
1997 Annual Report to Shareholders of Smartflex Systems, Inc.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Smartflex Systems,
Inc., listed in the Index at Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of
the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on
our audits. In our opinion, such consolidated financial statement schedule
referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated
financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects
the information set forth therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-95434) pertaining to the 1995 Equity Incentive Plan of
Smartflex Systems, Inc., the Registration statement (Form S-8 No. 33-95358)
pertaining to the 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Smartflex Systems, Inc.,
the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-32629) pertaining to the 1995
Equity Incentive Plan of Smartflex Systems, Inc. and the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-95372) pertaining to the 1993 Equity Incentive Plan of
Smartflex Systems, Inc. of our report dated January 24, 1998 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements incorporated herein by reference, and our
report included in the preceding paragraph with respect to the financial
statement schedule included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Smartflex
Systems, Inc.


                                             /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Orange County, California
March 27, 1998

                                       20
#### § 524.1662 Oxytetracycline ophthalmic and topical dosage forms.
Exhibit 23 (a)
Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on 
Form S-8 pertaining to the 1998 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, the 
1992 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan and 1992 Stock Option Plan of 
Concepts Direct, Inc. of our report dated February 9, 1999, with respect to the 
financial statements and schedule II of Concepts Direct, Inc. included in its 
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1998.

/s/ Ernst & Young
Denver, Colorado
March 31, 1999
Exhibit 10.1


 


Pluristem Ltd.







March 22, 2017







To:


Sosei Corporate Venture Capital Ltd.


Attn: Mr. Peter Bains







Re: Extension of Term Sheet Period







Reference is hereby made to a certain Term Sheet dated December 19, 2016, by and between Pluristem Ltd. and Sosei Corporate Venture Capital Ltd. (the "Term Sheet").







Pursuant to the "Timing and Expenses" clause in the Term Sheet, the parties hereby extend the term sheet period by additional 90 days starting from March 31, 2017 and ending on June 30, 2017.


 



	
 

	

Very truly yours,





 


Pluristem Ltd.





 


By: /s/ Zami Aberman


Name: Zami Aberman


Title: Chairman and CEO









 


The abovementioned decision is agreed and accepted by:


 


Sosei Corporate Venture Capital Ltd.







By: /s/ Peter Bains


Name: Peter Bains


Title: Representative Director and President


Date: March 31, 2017
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                          64,372
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,378
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        868
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               105,725
<PP&E>                                          37,141
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,581
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 142,307
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,236
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        59,387
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,401
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   142,307
<SALES>                                         77,764
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                77,764
<CGS>                                           16,514
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   59,860
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,834
<INCOME-TAX>                                       565
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,269
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,269
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.23
        

</TABLE>
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 18 , 202 4

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 2 4

- 00 206

- CV

LITA DEVELOPMENT LLC , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 2

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1137837

MEMORANDUM OPINION
This appeal is from a judgment signed November 21, 2023

. The notice of appeal was filed March 5, 2024 following the filing of a timely motion for new trial, and appellant was granted an extension of time to file the notice of appeal

. To date, our records show that appellant ha s not paid the appellate filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless party is excused by statute or by appellate rules from paying costs). Tex. Gov’t Code § 51.207 (appellate fees2

and costs).

O n April 2, 2024
, appellant was instructed to pay the appellate filing fee on or before April 12 , 20 2 4 or the appeal would be subject to dismissal without further
notice

. Appellant did not provide any response to the notice.

On May 14, 2024 , appellant w as ordered to pay the filing fee on or before May 24, 2024

. In the order, the court notified appellant that failure to comply with this requirement would leave the appeal subject to dismissal without further notice for want of prosecution

. Appellant ha s not paid the appellate filing fee, nor has it otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case because appellant has failed to comply with notice from clerk requi ring response or other action within specified time).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Bourliot, and Wilson.
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.1 


RETROPHIN, INC.
Amendment to Employment Agreement
This Amendment (the “Amendment”) is entered into as of April 11, 2017 and modifies the Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated March 3, 2015 by and between Retrophin, Inc. (the “Company”) and Stephen Aselage (“Executive”).  All capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Agreement.
The parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, agree to amend the Agreement as follows:
		
	1.
	Article 6, Section 6.8(a) of the Agreement shall be amended and restated in its entirety as follows:


“Severance Benefits.  If (i) within three (3) months prior to, or on or within twelve (12) months after, the consummation of a Change in Control (as defined in Section 6.8(b) herein), (1) the Company terminates Executive’s employment and this Agreement without Cause pursuant to Section 6.5 herein or (2) Executive resigns his or her employment and terminates this Agreement as a result of a Constructive Termination pursuant to Section 6.6 herein, and (ii) in either event (1) or (2), Executive signs the Release on or within the time period set forth therein, but in no event later than forty-five (45) days after the termination date and allows such Release to become effective, then Executive shall receive the following severance benefits in lieu of any severance benefits set forth in Section 6.5(b) or Section 6.6(b) herein:” 
		
	2.
	The Agreement and this Amendment represent the complete and entire understanding between the parties regarding the subject matter hereof and supersede all prior negotiations, representations or agreements, either written or oral, regarding this subject matter.  No provisions of this Amendment may be modified, waived or discharged unless such waiver, modification or discharge is agreed to in writing signed by Executive and such officer as may be specifically designated by the Board of Directors of the Company. 


		
	3.
	The validity, interpretation, construction and performance of this Amendment and the rights of the parties thereunder shall be interpreted and enforced under California law without reference to principles of conflicts of laws.  


		
	4.
	This Amendment may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but both of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.


		
	5.
	Except for the matters set forth in this Amendment, all other terms of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.


In Witness Whereof, the parties hereto have duly executed this Amendment as of the date set forth above.


	
				
	 
	 
	RETROPHIN, INC.

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	By:
	/s/ Gary Lyons

	 
	 
	Name:
	Gary Lyons

	 
	 
	Title:
	Chairman

	 
	 
	 
	 

	Accepted and agreed:
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	/s/ Stephen Aselage
	 
	 
	 

	Stephen Aselage
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Wayside Technology Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Simon F. Nynens, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|/s/ Simon F. Nynens                   | 
|------------------------------------- | 
|Simon F. Nynens                       | 
|President and Chief Executive Officer | 
|March 12, 2008                        | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
---

---

Exhibit
  14.2


**Consent of Independent Auditors**

We consent to the incorporation
  by reference in the Registration Statements (Form F-3 No. 333-47842 and No.
  333-92493), of our report dated March 30, 2004, with respect to the consolidated
  financial statements and schedules of NUR Macroprinters Ltd. included in this
  Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2003.

|Tel-Aviv,
      IsraelMarch 30, 2004 |                                                                       |                   
|------------------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------
|                                     |                                                                       | Yours
      truly,
|                                     |                                                                      
|                                     | /s/
      KOST FORER & GABBAY
       A Member of Ernst & Young Global

---

---
```

[Federal Register: August 9, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 152)]
[Notices]               
[Page 47797-47798]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr09au10-47]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Logistics Agency

[Docket ID: DOD-2010-OS-0110]

 
Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records

AGENCY: Defense Logistics Agency, DoD.

ACTION: Notice to delete a system of records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 47798]]

SUMMARY: The Defense Logistics Agency proposes to delete a system of 
records notice in its existing inventory of records systems subject to 
the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.

DATES: This proposed action will be effective without further notice on 
September 8, 2010, unless comments are received which result in a 
contrary determination.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by any of the following methods:
    * Federal Rulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 
instructions for submitting comments.
    * Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, Room 3C843 
Pentagon, 1160 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-1160.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name 
and docket number for this Federal Register document. The general 
policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is 
to make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet 
at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, 
including any personal identifiers or contact information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jody Sinkler at (703) 767-5045.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Defense Logistics Agency systems of 
records notices subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as 
amended, have been published in the Federal Register and are available 
from the Chief Privacy and FOIA Officer, Headquarters Defense Logistics 
Agency, ATTN: DGA, 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Suite 1644, Fort Belvoir, 
VA 22060-6221.
    The Agency proposes to delete a system of records notice in its 
inventory of record systems subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 
U.S.C. 552a), as amended. The proposed deletion is not within the 
purview of subsection (r) of the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), 
as amended, which requires the submission of a new or altered system 
report.

    Dated: August 4, 2010.
Mitchell S. Bryman,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
Deletion: S330.40 CAHS

System name:
    Employee Assistance Program Records (August 27, 1999; 64 FR 46889).

Reason:
    This collection is covered under the existing DHHS/FOH EAP Privacy 
notice 09-90-0010, entitled ``Employee Assistance Program (EAP) 
Records, HHS/OS/ASAM/OHR.''

[FR Doc. 2010-19543 Filed 8-6-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
§ 357.201 Scope. ( a ) An over-the-counter cholecystokinetic drug product in a form suitable for oral administration is generally recognized as safe and effective and is not misbranded if it meets each of the conditions in this subpart in addition to each of the general conditions established in § 330.1.
( b ) References in this subpart to regulatory sections of the Code of Federal Regulations are to chapter I of title 21 unless otherwise noted.
[48 FR 27005, June 10, 1983]
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.w (IBM LOGO)IBM Credit LLC     North
Castle Dr      Armark, NY 10504 May 11, 2004 Mr. Mitchell Rosen
Bell Industries, Inc.
1960 East Grand Avenue, Suite 560
El Segundo, CA 90245 Dear Mr. Rosen IBM Credit LLC, formerly IBM Credit Corporation (IBM Credit) and Bell Industries, Inc.
(Bell Industries) are parties to that certain Amended and Restated Agreement for Wholesale
Financing (Security Agreement), dated July 18, 2002 (as amended, modified or supplemented from
time to time, the Agreement). Capitalized terms used in this letter that are not otherwise defined shall have the meaning
ascribed thereto in the Agreement. IBM Credit has completed a financial review of Bell Industries. As we previously discussed and
after careful consideration, effective May 20, 2004, IBM Credit has decided to reduce Bell
Industries credit line, as set forth in the Agreement, from Three Million Dollars ($3,000,000.00)
to One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00). In addition, effective June 1, 2004, IBM Credit has also
decided to modify the scheduled payment plan from 1 pay 30 to 1 pay 15. Depending upon the date of
each invoice, payments are due on the 5th, 15th, or 25th day of the month following your purchase.
There are no financing charges associated with this plan provided that payments are received by
IBM Credit during the 15 day payment period as scheduled. Please sign below as your acknowledgment and agreement to the terms of this letter and mail the
original to the attention of Ms. Lisa Fitzpatrick at the above address on or prior to May 19, 2004. If you have any questions regarding this information, please contact Richard Blatchford at (630)
568-1262. Sincerely, -s- Thomas Harahan
Thomas Harahan
Manager of Credit Acknowledged and Agreed to: Mitchell
Rosen                            
5/12/04
(ADDRESSEES
NAME)              Date VIP-Corporate Controller
(TITLE)
[No. 39382-1-I.

Division One.

November 3, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Barry Weir, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 96-8-01218-8, Marsha J. Pechman, J., entered September 19, 1997. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
#### § 3.10 Stay of review time.

Any filing with or review by the product jurisdiction officer stays the review clock or other established time periods for agency action for an application for marketing approval or required investigational notice during the pendency of the review by the product jurisdiction officer.
#### Warren Company, Inc., *v.*Exodus.

[No. 17,206.

Filed March 13, 1944.]

*564[For opinion on the merits, see *post*p. 651.]

*Morris D. Feldman,*of South Bend, for appellant.

*Leo J. Lamberson*and *Theodore G. Wood,*both of South Bend, for appellee.

Flanagan, J.

Appellant brought this action against appellee for replevin of an electric refrigerator. Appellee answered the complaint and also filed a cross-complaint for damages based upon alleged breach of war*565ranty and fraud. Trial resulted in judgment against appellant on its complaint and for appellee on his cross-complaint in the sum of $420.

The sole error assigned on appeal is the overruling of appellant’s motion for a new trial, the specifications of which are that (1) the decision is not sustained by sufficient evidence, and (2) the decision is contrary to law.

In his answer brief appellee says that no question is presented and therefore does not attempt to answer appellant’s propositions.

It is true as appellee contends that a negative judgment cannot be attacked upon the ground that the decision is not sustained by sufficient evidence, and the judgment against appellant on its complaint could not be reversed on such an assignment. But'the evidence is in large part documentary. If appellant feels that the evidence entitles it to relief which was denied it by the decision, it may assert its contention under the specifications of the motion- for a new trial that the decision is contrary to law. *Wilson Admx.*v. *Rollings*(1938), 214 Ind. 155, 14 N. E. (2d) 905.

The judgment against appellant on appellee’s cross-complaint is not a negative judgment and as to it appellant may challenge the sufficiency of the evidence.

The administration of justice will be best served in this appeal if the court has the benefit of an answer brief on the merits. Therefore, final action on this appeal is continued and appellee is given 30 days in which to file an answer brief on the merits amicus curiae and appellant is given 15 days after the filing of such brief for reply.

Note. — Reported in 53 N. E. (2d) 546.
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION

I, James Vandeberg, Chief Financial Officer of IAS Communications,
  Inc. certify that:

1.        I have reviewed this annual report
  on Form 10-KSB of IAS Communications, Inc.;

2.       Based on my knowledge, this annual report
  does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
  material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
  under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
  covered by this annual report; and

3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial
  statements, and other financial information included in this annual report,
  fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
  operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
  in this annual report.

|                    | IAS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
|------------------- | ----------------------
|                    |                       
|                    | By:                   
|                    |                       
|                    |                       
|                    |                       
|                    |                       
|Date: July 27, 2004 |                       

---