alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7358 

To provide for a limitation on funds to implement, administer, or enforce 

certain general licenses issued by the Office of Foreign Assets Control 

of the Department of the Treasury. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2024 

Mr. OGLES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on funds to implement, administer, or enforce certain general licenses issued by the 

Office of Foreign Assets Control of the Department of 

the Treasury. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Carveouts for Ter5 rorists Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7358 IH

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON FUNDS TO IMPLEMENT, ADMIN2 ISTER, OR ENFORCE CERTAIN OFAC GEN3 ERAL LICENSES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—No funds may be made available 

5 to implement, administer, or enforce the following general 

6 licenses issued by the Office of Foreign Assets Control of 

7 the Department of the Treasury on January 17, 2024 

8 (pursuant to the Global Terrorism Sanctions Regulations 

9 under part 594 of title 31, Code of Federal Regulations): 

10 (1) General License 22. 

11 (2) General License 23. 

12 (3) General License 24. 

13 (4) General License 25. 

14 (5) General License 26. 

15 (b) CONGRESSIONAL APPROVAL.—Any general li16 cense issued by the Office of Foreign Assets Control after 

17 January 17, 2024, in relation to the designation of 

18 Ansarallah as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist, 

19 may only take effect pursuant to an Act of Congress en20 acted after the date of the enactment of this Act specifi21 cally authorizing such license to take effect. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 724 

To amend Public Law 115–97 (commonly known as the Tax Cuts and 

Jobs Act) to repeal the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge oil and gas 

program, and to preserve the Arctic coastal plain of the Arctic National 

Wildlife Refuge, Alaska, as wilderness in recognition of its extraordinary 

natural ecosystems and for the permanent good of present and future 

generations of Americans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2023 

Mr. HUFFMAN (for himself, Mr. FITZPATRICK, Mr. BEYER, Ms. BONAMICI, 

Mr. BOYLE of Pennsylvania, Ms. BROWNLEY, Ms. CHU, Mr. CONNOLLY, 

Ms. DAVIDS of Kansas, Ms. DELBENE, Mr. DESAULNIER, Mr. EVANS, 

Mr. FOSTER, Mr. GRIJALVA, Ms. JACOBS, Ms. JAYAPAL, Mr. KHANNA, 

Mr. KRISHNAMOORTHI, Mr. LARSEN of Washington, Ms. LEE of California, Mr. LEVIN, Ms. MATSUI, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Mr. MCGOVERN, Ms. 

MENG, Mr. NADLER, Mr. NEGUSE, Ms. OMAR, Mr. POCAN, Ms. PORTER, 

Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, Mr. SMITH of Washington, Ms. 

STANSBURY, Mr. SWALWELL, Mr. TAKANO, Ms. TOKUDA, Ms. 

BARRAGA ́N, and Mr. RASKIN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend Public Law 115–97 (commonly known as the 

Tax Cuts and Jobs Act) to repeal the Arctic National 

Wildlife Refuge oil and gas program, and to preserve 

the Arctic coastal plain of the Arctic National Wildlife 

Refuge, Alaska, as wilderness in recognition of its extraordinary natural ecosystems and for the permanent 

good of present and future generations of Americans. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 724 IH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Arctic Refuge Protec5 tion Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF ARCTIC NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE 

7 OIL AND GAS PROGRAM. 

8 Section 20001 of Public Law 115–97 is hereby re9 pealed. 

10 SEC. 3. DESIGNATION OF ADDITIONAL WILDERNESS, ARC11 TIC NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE, ALASKA. 

12 (a) DESIGNATION.—Notwithstanding any other pro13 vision of law, a portion of the Arctic National Wildlife Ref14 uge in Alaska comprising approximately 1,559,538 acres, 

15 as generally depicted on the map entitled ‘‘Arctic National 

16 Wildlife Refuge, Coastal Plain Proposed Wilderness’’, 

17 dated October 20, 2015, labeled with Map ID 03–0172, 

18 and available for inspection in the offices of the Secretary 

19 of the Interior, is designated as a component of the Na20 tional Wilderness Preservation System under the Wilder21 ness Act (16 U.S.C. 1131 et seq.). 

22 (b) ADMINISTRATION.—The Secretary of the Interior 

23 shall administer the area designated as wilderness by sub24 section (a) in accordance with the Wilderness Act as part 

25 of the wilderness area already in existence within the ArcVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:08 Feb 22, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H724.IH H724

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 724 IH

1 tic National Wildlife Refuge as of the date of the enact2 ment of this Act. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
**Exhibit 31 (a)**I, John Whetzell certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Northland Cable Properties SevenLimited Partnership; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrols over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to affect, theregistrant’s internal controls over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andboard of directors: a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting, which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls overfinancial reporting.**Date: 8-10-07**     /s/ JOHN S. WHETZELL     John S. Whetzell
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN FORM 10-K AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       9,887,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,979,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (50,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  2,607,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,526,000
<PP&E>                                       5,170,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,919,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,194,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,435,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  4,948,000
<COMMON>                                    19,642,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (9,831,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,194,000
<SALES>                                     17,573,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,573,000
<CGS>                                       10,950,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,283,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (483,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,177,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,177,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,177,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.47)
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7912

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

LARRY KENNETH SPEED, a/k/a Kenny Speed, a/k/a

Kenneth Richard Godfrey,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District

Judge. (CR-00-92, CA-02-230-2)

Submitted: April 24, 2003 Decided: May 1, 2003

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Kenneth Speed, Appellant Pro Se. Laura P. Tayman, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Larry Speed seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. An appeal may not be

taken from the final order in a motion under § 2255 unless a

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not

issue for claims addressed by a district court on the merits absent

“a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.”

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude Speed has not made the requisite showing. See

Miller-El v. Cockrell, U.S. , 123 S. Ct. 1029 (2003).

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Office of the Secretary

Office of State and Local 

Government Coordination &

Preparedness 

Washington, DC 20531 

ODP Information Bulletin 

No. 166 May 10, 2005 

TO: All State Administrative Agency Heads 

 All State Administrative Agency Points of Contact 

FROM: Matt A. Mayer 

 Acting Executive Director 

SUBJECT: FY 2005 Intercity Bus Security Grant Program Release 

The Department of Homeland Security is pleased to announce its Fiscal Year (FY) 2005 Intercity 

Bus Security Grant Program (IBSGP). The mission of the FY 2005 IBSGP is to create a 

sustainable effort for the protection of critical transportation infrastructure from terrorism, 

especially explosives and non-conventional threats that would cause major loss of life and severe 

disruption. Key features of the program include: 

3⁄4 Provides $9,657,138 to owners/operators of fixed route, intercity bus services using over-theroad buses. Funding will be provided directly to successful applicants. 

3⁄4 Eligibility will be determined based on the type of service provided (fixed-route, intercity bus 

services using over-the-road buses) and service to defined Urban Area Security Initiative 

(UASI) jurisdictions. Please refer to the (FY) 2005 Intercity Bus Security Grant Guidelines 

and Application Kit at http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/fundopps.htm for the list of eligible bus 

companies.

3⁄4 Intra-city and charter/tour bus services are not eligible for funding under the FY 2005 

IBSGP. 

3⁄4 The program places a strong emphasis on prevention and detection relative to improvised 

explosive devices (IEDs), as well as chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear devices 

(including sensors, canine units, etc.). 

3⁄4 Applications must be received by May 23, 2005. 

 

3⁄4 Successful applicants will be selected through a competitive process. ODP staff will review 

the NRP recommendations and make final selections for funding. As part of the final 
2

selection process, ODP staff will coordinate facility security enhancement projects 

identified for funding with the State Administrative Agency (SAA) in the affected states to 

ensure consistency with the State and Urban Area Homeland Security strategies. SAA 

input will be factored into the final decision making process. 

For additional information, please contact the SLGCP Centralized Scheduling and Information 

Desk at 1-800-368-6498.
[No. 40128-9-I.

Division One.

January 12, 1998.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. S.I.P., *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 96-8-03271-1, Michael Hayden, J., entered January 22, 1997. *Dismissed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Editorial Note on Part 201
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 201 appear at 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004.

§ 201.5 Drugs; adequate directions for use. *Adequate directions for use* means directions under which the layman can use a drug safely and for the purposes for which it is intended. (Section 201.128 defines “intended use.”) Directions for use may be inadequate because, among other reasons, of omission, in whole or in part, or incorrect specification of: ( a ) Statements of all conditions, purposes, or uses for which such drug is intended, including conditions, purposes, or uses for which it is prescribed, recommended, or suggested in its oral, written, printed, or graphic advertising, and conditions, purposes, or uses for which the drug is commonly used; except that such statements shall not refer to conditions, uses, or purposes for which the drug can be safely used only under the supervision of a practitioner licensed by law and for which it is advertised solely to such practitioner.
( b ) Quantity of dose, including usual quantities for each of the uses for which it is intended and usual quantities for persons of different ages and different physical conditions.
( c ) Frequency of administration or application.
( d ) Duration of administration or application.
( e ) Time of administration or application (in relation to time of meals, time of onset of symptoms, or other time factors).
( f ) Route or method of administration or application.
( g ) Preparation for use, i.e., shaking, dilution, adjustment of temperature, or, other manipulation or process.
[41 FR 6908, Feb. 13, 1976]
# RE ..r-.!f-'\·'E···o**~.** 

# · vt:.l v "": · U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

## DEC 30 2015 

## HEARING DOCKET
Inthe matter of: Ridan Investments, Inc.
JUDGE RICHARD C. GOODWIN ) ) 

### ) ) FAA DocketNo. FAA-2013-1082 Case No. 2012S0720133

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE Pursuant to 14 C.P.R.§ 13.204(a), Glenn H. Brown, 222 W 71 h Ave Box 14, Anchorage, AK 99513; telephone: 907-271-5271; hereby givesnotice ofhis appearance in this matter for Complainant Federal Aviation Administration.
All future pleadings in this matter must be served onhim and not the previously assigned attorney, Courtney Adolph.
Dated this 18th day ofDecember 2015. PeterJ.Lynch Assistant ChiefCounsel

for Enforcement
By: Glenn H. Brown .Enforcement Division, Western Team 222 W 7th Avenue Box 14 Anchorage, AK 99513-7587 email: glenn.brown@faa.gov telephone: (907) 271-5271 (direct) (907) 271-2800 (fax)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Re: Ridan Investments, Inc. FDMS No. FAA-2013-1082
I hereby certifythat onthis date I have served a copy ofthe foregoing Notice ofAppearance by postage-prepaid, certified mail, return receiptrequested, to 

### the following: The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 US Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 Fax: 202-366-7536 Lawrence M. Burek, Respondent's Counsel Ridan Investments, Inc. 550 North Parkcenter Drive, Ste. 204 Santa Ana, CA 92705

I further certifythat onthis date I have served the original and one copy ofthe foregoing Notice ofAppearance bypostage-prepaid, certified mail, return receipt requested and facsimile, addressed as follows: Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 ATTN: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 000 Fax: (202) 493-5020 DATED:

Federal Aviation Administration Office ofRegional Counsel 222 West 7th Avenue, Box 14, AAL-7 Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7587 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6842

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

FREDDY PRATS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District

Judge. (CR-82-43-BR, CA-97-148-5-1-BR)

Submitted: December 11, 1997 Decided: December 24, 1997

Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Freddy Prats, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver, Assistant

United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Prats, Nos. CR-82-43-BR; CA-97-148-5-1-BR

(E.D.N.C. May 28, 1997). We deny Appellant's motion to direct the

district court to provide him with trial transcripts. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32 (a)
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
(15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78(d)); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Partnership.
 Date: 8-22-08
 /s/
    
    JOHN S. WHETZELL

John S. WhetzellChief Executive Officer
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Northland
Cable Properties Seven Limited Partnership and will be retained by Northland Cable Properties Seven
Limited Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
```

[108th Congress Public Law 247]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ247.108]

[[Page 118 STAT. 681]]

Public Law 108-247
108th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
525 Main Street in Tarboro, North Carolina, as the ``George Henry White 
     Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: June 25, 2004 -  [H.R. 3353]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 525 Main 
Street in Tarboro, North Carolina, shall be known and designated as the 
``George Henry White Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``George Henry White Post 
Office Building''.

    Approved June 25, 2004.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3353:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 149 (2003):
                                    Nov. 17, considered and passed 
                                        House.
                                                        Vol. 150 (2004):
                                    June 9, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.

                                  <all>
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.0


                       Consent of Independent Accountants


The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Consep, Inc. and Subsidiaries:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos.
33-86638, 33-95130 and 333-09759) on Form S-8 of Consep, Inc. and subsidiaries
of our report dated February 5, 1997, relating to the consolidated balance
sheets of Consep, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and
the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
1996, which report appears on Form 10-K of Consep, Inc. and subsidiaries.


                                    /S/ KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP


March 26, 1997
[No. 39654-4-I

Division One.

November 3, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Brandon Lane McCulloch, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 96-8-03204-4, Anthony P. Wartnik, J., entered October 31, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
**Exhibit 32**

**Certification of Periodic Financial Report Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of AMCOL International Corporation (the “Company”) certifies that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended June 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| Date:    August 8, 2006 |   | /s/ Lawrence   E. Washow  |
|------------------------------|--------|---------------------------|
|                         |   |                           |
|                         |   | Lawrence E.   Washow      |
|                         |   | Chief   Executive Officer |
|                         |   |                      |
|                         |   |                      |
| Date:    August 8, 2006 |   | /s/ Gary L.   Castagna    |
|                         |   |                           |
|                         |   | Gary L.   Castagna        |
|                         |   | Chief   Financial Officer |