Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2010 / Proposed Rules 8005 

Comments Due Date 

(a) We must receive comments by April 9, 

2010. 

Affected ADs 

(b) None. 

Applicability 

(c) This AD applies to Airbus Model A318– 

111, –112, –121, and –122 airplanes; Model 

A319–111, –112, –113, –114, –115, –131, 

–132, and –133 airplanes; Model A320–111, 

–211, –212, –214, –231, –232, and –233 

airplanes; and Model A321–111, –112, –131, 

–211, –212, –213, –231, and –232 airplanes; 

certificated in any category; all manufacturer 

serial numbers; except airplanes that have 

received Airbus modification 37317 in 

production. 

Subject 

(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of 

America Code 24: Electrical power. 

Reason 

(e) The mandatory continuing 

airworthiness information (MCAI) states: 

‘‘Several occurrences of loss of the AC 

[alternating current] BUS 1 have been 

reported which led in some instances to the 

loss of the AC ESS [essential] BUS and DC 

[direct current] ESS BUS and connected 

systems. The affected systems include 

multiple flight deck Display Units (Primary 

Flight Display, Navigation Display and Upper 

Electronic Centralised Aircraft Monitoring 

display). 

‘‘The reasons for these events have been 

investigated but have not been fully 

established for all cases. 

‘‘Due to the range of system losses some 

crews reported difficulty in establishing the 

failure cause during the events and, 

consequently, the appropriate actions to be 

taken may not be completed in a timely 

manner. 

‘‘The loss of multiple display units, if not 

corrected expediently during a high 

workload period, potentially affects the 

capability of the flight crew and could 

contribute to a loss of situational awareness 

and consequent control of the aeroplane, 

which would constitute an unsafe condition. 

‘‘This AD therefore mandates the 

modification of the electrical network 

configuration management logic consisting in 

adding an automatic switching of the AC and 

DC ESS BUS power supply such that upon 

the loss of the AC BUS 1, the AC BUS 2 will 

automatically take over the power supply. On 

pre-MOD aeroplanes, this power supply 

switching can only be accomplished 

manually from the cockpit and is covered by 

an Electronic Centralized Aircraft Monitoring 

(ECAM) procedure.’’ 

The modification of the electrical power 

distribution system includes, depending on 

the configuration, adding a new circuit 

breaker and new relay to the AC/DC ESS BUS 

circuit, and adding a diode between a certain 

relay and terminal block. 

Compliance 

(f) You are responsible for having the 

actions required by this AD performed within 

the compliance times specified, unless the 

actions have already been done. 

Actions 

(g) Within 48 months after the effective 

date of this AD, modify the electrical power 

distribution system, in accordance with the 

Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus 

Service Bulletin A320–24–1120, Revision 03, 

dated July 10, 2009. 

(h) Actions accomplished before the 

effective date of this AD, in accordance with 

a service bulletin identified in Table 1 of this 

AD, are considered acceptable for 

compliance with the corresponding actions 

specified in this AD. 

TABLE 1—CREDIT SERVICE INFORMATION

Airbus Service Bulletin— Revision— Dated— 

A320–24–1120 .................................................. Original ............................................................. May 31, 2007. 

A320–24–1120 .................................................. 01 ...................................................................... December 19, 2007. 

A320–24–1120 .................................................. 02 ...................................................................... July 8, 2008. 

FAA AD Differences 

Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI 

and/or service information as follows: No 

differences. 

Other FAA AD Provisions 

(i) The following provisions also apply to 

this AD: 

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs): The Manager, International 

Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, FAA, has the authority to 

approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested 

using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. 

Send information to ATTN: Tim Dulin, 

Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, 

ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, 

Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425) 

227–2141; fax (425) 227–1149. Before using 

any approved AMOC on any airplane to 

which the AMOC applies, notify your 

principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or 

principal avionics inspector (PAI), as 

appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector, 

your local Flight Standards District Office. 

The AMOC approval letter must specifically 

reference this AD. 

(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement 

in this AD to obtain corrective actions from 

a manufacturer or other source, use these 

actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective 

actions are considered FAA-approved if they 

are approved by the State of Design Authority 

(or their delegated agent). You are required 

to assure the product is airworthy before it 

is returned to service. 

(3) Reporting Requirements: For any 

reporting requirement in this AD, under the 

provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act 

(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) has 

approved the information collection 

requirements and has assigned OMB Control 

Number 2120–0056. 

Related Information 

(j) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety 

Agency (EASA) Airworthiness Directive 

2009–0235, dated October 29, 2009; and 

Airbus Service Bulletin A320–24–1120, 

Revision 03, dated July 10, 2009; for related 

information. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 

16, 2010. 

Stephen P. Boyd, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2010–3442 Filed 2–22–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 165 

[Docket No. USCG–2010–0023] 

RIN 1625–AA00 

Safety Zone; Wicomico Community 

Fireworks, Great Wicomico River, Mila, 

VA 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes 

establishing a safety zone on the Great 

Wicomico River in the vicinity of Mila, 

VA in support of the Wicomico 

Community Fireworks event. This 

action is intended to restrict vessel 

traffic movement on the Great Wicomico 

River to protect mariners from the 

hazards associated with fireworks 

displays. 

DATES: Comments and related material 

must be received by the Coast Guard on 

or before April 26, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

identified by docket number USCG– 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS

8006 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2010 / Proposed Rules 

2010–0023 using any one of the 

following methods: 

(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

http://www.regulations.gov. 

(2) Fax: 202–493–2251. 

(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility 

(M–30), U.S. Department of 

Transportation, West Building Ground 

Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590– 

0001. 

(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail 

address above, between 9 a.m. and 5 

p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. The telephone number 

is 202–366–9329. 

To avoid duplication, please use only 

one of these four methods. See the 

‘‘Public Participation and Request for 

Comments’’ portion of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 

below for instructions on submitting 

comments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this proposed 

rule, call LT Tiffany Duffy, Chief 

Waterways Management Division, 

Sector Hampton Roads, Coast Guard; 

telephone (757) 668–5580, e-mail 

Tiffany.A.Duffy@uscg.mil. If you have 

questions on viewing or submitting 

material to the docket, call Renee V. 

Wright, Program Manager, Docket 

Operations, telephone 202–366–9826. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Public Participation and Request for 

Comments 

We encourage you to participate in 

this rulemaking by submitting 

comments and related materials. All 

comments received will be posted 

without change to http:// 

www.regulations.gov and will include 

any personal information you have 

provided. 

Submitting Comments 

If you submit a comment, please 

include the docket number for this 

rulemaking (USCG–2010–0023), 

indicate the specific section of this 

document to which each comment 

applies, and provide a reason for each 

suggestion or recommendation. You 

may submit your comments and 

material online (via http:// 

www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or 

hand delivery, but please use only one 

of these means. If you submit a 

comment online via http:// 

www.regulations.gov, it will be 

considered received by the Coast Guard 

when you successfully transmit the 

comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or 

mail your comment, it will be 

considered as having been received by 

the Coast Guard when it is received at 

the Docket Management Facility. We 

recommend that you include your name 

and a mailing address, an e-mail 

address, or a telephone number in the 

body of your document so that we can 

contact you if we have questions 

regarding your submission. 

To submit your comment online, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov, click on the 

‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will 

then become highlighted in blue. In the 

‘‘Document Type’’ drop down menu 

select ‘‘Proposed Rule’’ and insert 

‘‘USCG–2010–0023’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’ 

box. Click ‘‘Search’’ then click on the 

balloon shape in the ‘‘Actions’’ column. 

If you submit your comments by mail or 

hand delivery, submit them in an 

unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 

11 inches, suitable for copying and 

electronic filing. If you submit 

comments by mail and would like to 

know that they reached the Facility, 

please enclose a stamped, self-addressed 

postcard or envelope. We will consider 

all comments and material received 

during the comment period and may 

change the rule based on your 

comments. 

Viewing Comments and Documents 

To view comments, as well as 

documents mentioned in this preamble 

as being available in the docket, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov, click on the 

‘‘read comments’’ box, which will then 

become highlighted in blue. In the 

‘‘Keyword’’ box insert ‘‘USCG–2010– 

0023’’ and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click the 

‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’ 

column. You may also visit the Docket 

Management Facility in Room W12–140 

on the ground floor of the Department 

of Transportation West Building, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, 

DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, except Federal 

holidays. We have an agreement with 

the Department of Transportation to use 

the Docket Management Facility. 

Privacy Act 

Anyone can search the electronic 

form of comments received into any of 

our dockets by the name of the 

individual submitting the comment (or 

signing the comment, if submitted on 

behalf of an association, business, labor 

union, etc.). You may review a Privacy 

Act notice regarding our public dockets 

in the January 17, 2008, issue of the 

Federal Register (73 FR 3316). 

Public Meeting 

We do not now plan to hold a public 

meeting. But you may submit a request 

for one using one of the four methods 

specified under ADDRESSES. Please 

explain why you believe a public 

meeting would be beneficial. If we 

determine that one would aid this 

rulemaking, we will hold one at a time 

and place announced by a later notice 

in the Federal Register. 

For information on facilities or 

services for individuals with disabilities 

or to request special assistance at the 

public meeting, contact Tiffany Duffy, 

Chief, Waterways Management Division, 

Sector Hampton Roads at the telephone 

number or e-mail address indicated 

under the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT section of this notice. 

Background and Purpose 

On July 3, 2010 the Wicomico Church 

will sponsor a fireworks display on the 

Great Wicomico River approximately 1⁄2

mile down river of Rouge Point Light, at 

position 37°50′31′′ N/076°19′42′′ W 

(NAD 1983). The fireworks are launched 

on land and the safety zone is intended 

to keep mariners away from any fall out 

that may enter in the water. Due to the 

need to protect mariners and spectators 

from the hazards associated with the 

fireworks display, access to the Great 

Wicomico River within 420 feet of the 

fireworks display will be temporarily 

restricted. 

Discussion of Proposed Rule 

The Coast Guard proposes 

establishing a safety zone on specified 

waters of the Great Wicomico River in 

the vicinity of Mila, Virginia. This safety 

zone will encompass all navigable 

waters within 420 feet of the fireworks 

display located at position 37°50′31′′ N/ 

076°19′42′′ W (NAD 1983). This 

regulated area will be established in the 

interest of public safety during the 

Wicomico Community Fireworks event 

and will be enforced from 9 p.m. to 10 

p.m. on July 3, 2010, with a rain date 

of July 4, 2010. Access to the safety zone 

will be restricted during the specified 

date and times. Except for participants 

and vessels authorized by the Captain of 

the Port or his Representative, no person 

or vessel may enter or remain in the 

regulated area. 

Regulatory Analyses 

We developed this proposed rule after 

considering numerous statutes and 

executive orders related to rulemaking. 

Below we summarize our analyses 

based on 13 of these statutes or 

executive orders. 

Regulatory Planning and Review 

This proposed rule is not a significant 

regulatory action under section 3(f) of 

Executive Order 12866, Regulatory 

Planning and Review, and does not 

require an assessment of potential costs 

and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2010 / Proposed Rules 8007 

Order. The Office of Management and 

Budget has not reviewed it under that 

Order. Although this proposed 

regulation restricts access to the safety 

zone, the effect of this rule will not be 

significant because: (i) The safety zone 

will be in effect for a limited duration; 

(ii) the zone is of limited size; and (iii) 

the Coast Guard will make notifications 

via maritime advisories so mariners can 

adjust their plans accordingly. 

Small Entities 

Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act 

(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered 

whether this proposed rule would have 

a significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises 

small businesses, not-for-profit 

organizations that are independently 

owned and operated and are not 

dominant in their fields, and 

governmental jurisdictions with 

populations of less than 50,000. 

The Coast Guard certifies under 5 

U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule 

would not have a significant economic 

impact on a substantial number of small 

entities because the zone will only be in 

place for a limited duration and 

maritime advisories will be issued 

allowing the mariners to adjust their 

plans accordingly. However, this rule 

may affect the following entities, some 

of which may be small entities: the 

owners and operators of vessels 

intending to transit or anchor in that 

portion of the Great Wicomico River 

from 9 p.m. to 10 p.m. on July 3, 2010. 

If you think that your business, 

organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity 

and that this rule would have a 

significant economic impact on it, 

please submit a comment (see 

ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it 

qualifies and how and to what degree 

this rule would economically affect it. 

Assistance for Small Entities 

Under section 213(a) of the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), 

we want to assist small entities in 

understanding this proposed rule so that 

they can better evaluate its effects on 

them and participate in the rulemaking. 

If the rule would affect your small 

business, organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction and you have questions 

concerning its provisions or options for 

compliance, please contact Lieutenant 

Tiffany Duffy, Chief, Waterways 

Management Division, Sector Hampton 

Roads at (757) 668–5580. The Coast 

Guard will not retaliate against small 

entities that question or complain about 

this proposed rule or any policy or 

action of the Coast Guard. 

Collection of Information 

This proposed rule would call for no 

new collection of information under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501–3520). 

Federalism 

A rule has implications for federalism 

under Executive Order 13132, 

Federalism, if it has a substantial direct 

effect on State or local governments and 

would either preempt State law or 

impose a substantial direct cost of 

compliance on them. We have analyzed 

this proposed rule under that Order and 

have determined that it does not have 

implications for federalism. 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires 

Federal agencies to assess the effects of 

their discretionary regulatory actions. In 

particular, the Act addresses actions 

that may result in the expenditure by a 

State, local, or tribal government, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector of 

$100,000,000 or more in any one year. 

Though this proposed rule would not 

result in such an expenditure, we do 

discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 

in this preamble. 

Taking of Private Property 

This proposed rule would not affect a 

taking of private property or otherwise 

have taking implications under 

Executive Order 12630, Governmental 

Actions and Interference with 

Constitutionally Protected Property 

Rights. 

Civil Justice Reform 

This proposed rule meets applicable 

standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of 

Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice 

Reform, to minimize litigation, 

eliminate ambiguity, and reduce 

burden. 

Protection of Children 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Executive Order 13045, 

Protection of Children from 

Environmental Health Risks and Safety 

Risks. This rule is not an economically 

significant rule and would not create an 

environmental risk to health or risk to 

safety that might disproportionately 

affect children. 

Indian Tribal Governments 

This proposed rule does not have 

tribal implications under Executive 

Order 13175, Consultation and 

Coordination with Indian Tribal 

Governments, because it would not have 

a substantial direct effect on one or 

more Indian tribes, on the relationship 

between the Federal Government and 

Indian tribes, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes. 

Energy Effects 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Executive Order 13211, Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use. We have 

determined that it is not a ‘‘significant 

energy action’’ under that order because 

it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ 

under Executive Order 12866 and is not 

likely to have a significant adverse effect 

on the supply, distribution, or use of 

energy. The Administrator of the Office 

of Information and Regulatory Affairs 

has not designated it as a significant 

energy action. Therefore, it does not 

require a Statement of Energy Effects 

under Executive Order 13211. 

Technical Standards 

The National Technology Transfer 

and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 

U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use 

voluntary consensus standards in their 

regulatory activities unless the agency 

provides Congress, through the Office of 

Management and Budget, with an 

explanation of why using these 

standards would be inconsistent with 

applicable law or otherwise impractical. 

Voluntary consensus standards are 

technical standards (e.g., specifications 

of materials, performance, design, or 

operation; test methods; sampling 

procedures; and related management 

systems practices) that are developed or 

adopted by voluntary consensus 

standards bodies. 

This proposed rule does not use 

technical standards. Therefore, we did 

not consider the use of voluntary 

consensus standards. 

Environment 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Department of Homeland 

Security Management Directive 023–01 

and Commandant Instruction 

M16475.lD, which guide the Coast 

Guard in complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and 

have made a preliminary determination 

that this action is one of a category of 

actions which do not individually or 

cumulatively have a significant effect on 

the human environment. Therefore, this 

rule is categorically excluded, under 

section 2.B.2. Figure 2–1, paragraph 

34(g), of the Instruction and neither an 

environmental assessment nor an 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS

8008 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 23, 2010 / Proposed Rules 

environmental impact statement is 

required. A preliminary environmental 

analysis check list supporting this 

determination is available in the docket 

where indicated under ADDRESSES. This 

rule involves establishing a safety zone 

around a fireworks display. We seek any 

comments or information that may lead 

to the discovery of a significant 

environmental impact from this 

proposed rule. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation 

(water), Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Security measures, 

Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to 

amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows: 

PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION 

AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 

1. The authority citation for part 165 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. 

Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 

33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6 and 160.5; 

Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department 

of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. 

2. Add § 165.T05–XXXX to read as 

follows: 

165.T05–XXXX Safety Zone; Wicomico 

Community Fireworks, Great Wicomico 

River, Mila, VA. 

(a) Regulated Area. The following area 

is a safety zone: specified waters of the 

Great Wicomico River located within a 

420 foot radius of the fireworks display 

approximately 1⁄2 mile down river of 

Rouge Point Light, at approximate 

position 37°50′31′′ N/076°19′42′′ W 

(NAD 1983) in the vicinity of Mila, VA. 

(b) Definitions. For the purposes of 

this part, Captain of the Port 

Representative means any U.S. Coast 

Guard commissioned, warrant or petty 

officer who has been authorized by the 

Captain of the Port, Hampton Roads, 

Virginia to act on his behalf. 

(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with 

the general regulations in 165.23 of this 

part, entry into this zone is prohibited 

unless authorized by the Captain of the 

Port, Hampton Roads or his designated 

representatives. 

(2) The operator of any vessel in the 

immediate vicinity of this safety zone 

shall: 

(i) Stop the vessel immediately upon 

being directed to do so by any 

commissioned, warrant or petty officer 

on shore or on board a vessel that is 

displaying a U.S. Coast Guard Ensign. 

(ii) Proceed as directed by any 

commissioned, warrant or petty officer 

on shore or on board a vessel that is 

displaying a U.S. Coast Guard Ensign. 

(3) The Captain of the Port, Hampton 

Roads can be reached through the Sector 

Duty Officer at Sector Hampton Roads 

in Portsmouth, Virginia at telephone 

Number (757) 668–5555. 

(4) The Coast Guard Representatives 

enforcing the safety zone can be 

contacted on VHF–FM marine band 

radio channel 13 (165.65 Mhz) and 

channel 16 (156.8 Mhz). 

(d) Effective Period: This regulation 

will be in effect on July 3, 2010, with 

a rain date of July 4, 2010 from 9 p.m. 

until 10 p.m. 

Dated: February 2, 2010. 

M.S. Ogle, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port, Hampton Roads. 

[FR Doc. 2010–3474 Filed 2–22–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R09–OAR–2010–0120; FRL–9116–3] 

Revisions to the California State 

Implementation Plan, Imperial County 

Air Pollution Control District 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing a limited 

approval and limited disapproval of 

revisions to the Imperial County Air 

Pollution Control District (ICAPCD) 

portion of the California State 

Implementation Plan (SIP). These 

revisions concern coarse particulate 

matter (PM10) emissions from sources of 

fugitive dust such as construction sites, 

unpaved roads, and disturbed soils in 

open and agricultural areas. We are 

proposing action on local rules that 

regulate these emission sources under 

the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 

(CAA or the Act). We are taking 

comments on this proposal and plan to 

follow with a final action. 

DATES: Any comments must arrive by 

March 25, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, 

identified by docket number EPA–R09– 

OAR–2010–0120, by one of the 

following methods: 

1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line 

instructions. 

2. E-mail: steckel.andrew@epa.gov. 

3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel 

(Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, 

San Francisco, CA 94105–3901. 

Instructions: All comments will be 

included in the public docket without 

change and may be made available 

online at http://www.regulations.gov, 

including any personal information 

provided, unless the comment includes 

Confidential Business Information (CBI) 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Information that 

you consider CBI or otherwise protected 

should be clearly identified as such and 

should not be submitted through http:// 

www.regulations.gov or e-mail. http:// 

www.regulations.gov is an ‘‘anonymous 

access’’ system, and EPA will not know 

your identity or contact information 

unless you provide it in the body of 

your comment. If you send e-mail 

directly to EPA, your e-mail address 

will be automatically captured and 

included as part of the public comment. 

If EPA cannot read your comment due 

to technical difficulties and cannot 

contact you for clarification, EPA may 

not be able to consider your comment. 

Docket: The index to the docket for 

this action is available electronically at 

http://www.regulations.gov and in hard 

copy at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne 

Street, San Francisco, California. While 

all documents in the docket are listed in 

the index, some information may be 

publicly available only at the hard copy 

location (e.g., copyrighted material), and 

some may not be publicly available in 

either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the 

hard copy materials, please schedule an 

appointment during normal business 

hours with the contact listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Andrew Steckel, EPA Region IX, (415) 

947–4115, steckel.andrew@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’ 

and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. 

Table of Contents 

I. The State’s Submittal 

A. What Rules Did the State Submit? 

B. Are There Other Versions of These 

Rules? 

C. What Is the Purpose of the Submitted 

Rules? 

II. EPA’s Evaluation 

A. How Is EPA Evaluating the Rules? 

B. Do the Rules Meet the Evaluation 

Criteria? 

C. What Are the Rules’ Deficiencies? 

D. EPA Recommendations To Further 

Improve the Rules 

III. Proposed Action and Public Comment 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. The State’s Submittal 

A. What Rules Did the State Submit? 

Table 1 lists the rules addressed by 

this proposal with the dates that they 

were adopted by the local air agency, 

ICAPCD, and submitted by the 

California Air Resources Board (ARB). 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS