alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7174 

To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to equalize the negotiation 

period between small-molecule and biologic candidates under the Drug 

Price Negotiation Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 31, 2024 

Mr. MURPHY (for himself, Mr. DAVIS of North Carolina, and Mr. GUTHRIE) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and 

Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to equalize 

the negotiation period between small-molecule and biologic candidates under the Drug Price Negotiation Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 7174 IH

1 SECTION 1. EQUALIZING THE NEGOTIATION PERIOD BE2 TWEEN SMALL-MOLECULE AND BIOLOGIC 

3 CANDIDATES UNDER THE DRUG PRICE NEGO4 TIATION PROGRAM. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1192(e)(1)(A)(ii) of the 

6 Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320f–1(e)(1)(A)(ii)) is 

7 amended by striking ‘‘7 years’’ and inserting ‘‘11 years’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) shall take effect as if included in the enact10 ment of Public Law 117–169. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
§ 1311.170 Transmission requirements. ( a ) The electronic prescription application must transmit the electronic prescription as soon as possible after signature by the practitioner.
( b ) The electronic prescription application may print a prescription that has been transmitted only if an intermediary or the designated pharmacy notifies a practitioner that an electronic prescription was not successfully delivered to the designated pharmacy. If this occurs, the electronic prescription application may print the prescription for the practitioner's manual signature. The printed prescription must include information noting that the prescription was originally transmitted electronically to [name of the specific pharmacy] on [date/time] and that transmission failed.
( c ) The electronic prescription application may print copies of the transmitted prescription if they are clearly labeled: “Copy only—not valid for dispensing.” Data on the prescription may be electronically transferred to medical records, and a list of prescriptions written may be printed for patients if the list indicates that it is for informational purposes only and not for dispensing.
( d ) The electronic prescription application must not allow the transmission of an electronic prescription if an original prescription was printed prior to attempted transmission.
( e ) The contents of the prescription required by part 1306 of this chapter must not be altered during transmission between the practitioner and pharmacy. Any change to the content during transmission, including truncation or removal of data, will render the electronic prescription invalid. The electronic prescription data may be converted from one software version to another between the electronic prescription application and the pharmacy application; conversion includes altering the structure of fields or machine language so that the receiving pharmacy application can read the prescription and import the data.
( f ) An electronic prescription must be transmitted from the practitioner to the pharmacy in its electronic form. At no time may an intermediary convert an electronic prescription to another form (e.g., facsimile) for transmission.
#### § 211.182 Equipment cleaning and use log.

A written record of major equipment cleaning, maintenance (except routine maintenance such as lubrication and adjustments), and use shall be included in individual equipment logs that show the date, time, product, and lot number of each batch processed. If equipment is dedicated to manufacture of one product, then individual equipment logs are not required, provided that lots or batches of such product follow in numerical order and are manufactured in numerical sequence. In cases where dedicated equipment is employed, the records of cleaning, maintenance, and use shall be part of the batch record. The persons performing and double-checking the cleaning and maintenance (or, if the cleaning and maintenance is performed using automated equipment under § 211.68, just the person verifying the cleaning and maintenance done by the automated equipment) shall date and sign or initial the log indicating that the work was performed. Entries in the log shall be in chronological order.

[73 FR 51933, Sept. 8, 2008]
Exhibit 13





Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of


1934 and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Ellomay Capital Ltd. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned officers of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





A)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





B)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Ran Fridrich

Ran Fridrich

Chief Executive Officer



/s/ Kalia Weintraub

Kalia Weintraub

Chief Financial Officer




Date: April 30, 2015
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 266 

Designating the week of April 15, 2017, through April 23, 2017, as ‘‘National 

Park Week’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 6, 2017 

Mrs. LOVE (for herself, Mr. GOSAR, Mr. STEWART, Mr. CHAFFETZ, and Mr. 

BISHOP of Utah) submitted the following resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Natural Resources 

RESOLUTION 

Designating the week of April 15, 2017, through April 23, 

2017, as ‘‘National Park Week’’. 

Whereas, on March 1, 1872, Congress established Yellowstone National Park as the first national park for the enjoyment of the people of the United States; 

Whereas, on August 25, 1916, Congress established the National Park Service with the mission to preserve 

unimpaired the natural and cultural resources and values 

of the National Park System for the enjoyment, education, and inspiration of current and future generations; 

Whereas, in 2017, the National Park Service began its second century of stewardship of the National Park System 

after the 2016 National Park Service Centennial, which 

celebrated 100 years of the work of the National Park 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 266 IH 

Service to protect and manage the majestic landscapes, 

hallowed battlefields, and iconic cultural and historical 

sites of the United States; 

Whereas the units of the National Park System span from 

Maine to Hawaii and Alaska and many of the units embody the rich natural heritage of the United States, reflect a unique national story through people and places, 

and offer countless opportunities for recreation, volunteerism, cultural exchange, education, civic engagement, and exploration; 

Whereas the national parks of the United States attracted 

record-breaking visitation during the National Park Service Centennial, with 331,000,000 recreational visits to 

these incredible places in 2016; 

Whereas the dedicated employees of the National Park Service carry out their mission to protect the national parks 

of the United States so that the vibrant culture, diverse 

wildlife, and priceless resources of the parks will endure 

for perpetuity; and 

Whereas the people of the United States have inherited the 

remarkable legacy of the National Park System and are 

entrusted with its preservation as the United States 

marks the beginning of the second century of the National Park System: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of ‘‘National Park 

3 Week’’; and 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 266 IH 

1 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

2 and the world to visit and experience the treasured 

3 national parks of the United States. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
##### 



(1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
 /s/  WILLIAM C. GRIFFITHSWilliam C. GriffithsChairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer
Champion Enterprises, Inc. July 26, 2007/s/  PHYLLIS A. KNIGHTPhyllis A. KnightExecutive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
Champion Enterprises, Inc.July 26, 2007
Editorial Note on Part 25
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 25 appear at 88 FR 45065, July 14, 2023.

§ 25.33 Animal drugs. The classes of actions listed in this section are categorically excluded and, therefore, ordinarily do not require the preparation of an EA or an EIS: ( a ) Action on an NADA, abbreviated application, request for determination of eligibility for indexing, a supplement to such applications, or a modification of an index listing, if the action does not increase the use of the drug. Actions to which this categorical exclusion applies may include: ( 1 ) An animal drug to be marketed under the same conditions of approval as a previously approved animal drug;
( 2 ) A combination of previously approved animal drugs;
( 3 ) A new premix or other formulation of a previously approved animal drug;
( 4 ) Changes specified in § 514.8(b)(3), (b)(4), or (c)(3) of this chapter;
( 5 ) A change of sponsor; or
( 6 ) A previously approved animal drug to be contained in medicated feed blocks under § 510.455 of this chapter or as a liquid feed supplement under § 558.5 of this chapter.
( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) Action on an NADA, abbreviated application, request for determination of eligibility for indexing, a supplement to such applications, or a modification of an index listing, for substances that occur naturally in the environment when the action does not alter significantly the concentration or distribution of the substance, its metabolites, or degradation products in the environment.
( d ) Action on an NADA, abbreviated application, request for determination of eligibility for indexing, a supplement to such applications, or a modification of an index listing, for: ( 1 ) Drugs intended for use in nonfood animals;
( 2 ) Anesthetics, both local and general, that are individually administered;
( 3 ) Nonsystemic topical and ophthalmic animal drugs;
( 4 ) Drugs for minor species, including wildlife and endangered species, when the drug has been previously approved for use in another or the same species where similar animal management practices are used; and
( 5 ) Drugs intended for use under prescription or veterinarian's order for therapeutic use in terrestrial species.
( e ) Action on an INAD.
( f ) Action on an application submitted under section 512(m) of the act.
( g ) Withdrawal of approval of an NADA or an abbreviated NADA or removal of a new animal drug from the index.
( h ) Withdrawal of approval of a food additive petition that reduces or eliminates animal feed uses of a food additive.
[62 FR 40592, July 29, 1997, as amended at 71 FR 74782, Dec. 13, 2006; 72 FR 69119, Dec. 6, 2007; 85 FR 72907, Nov. 16, 2020]
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 19 - 00004 - CV ACRS 2000 CORP., APP ELL ANT V. PRIDE NETWORK, INC. , D/B/A NTS COMMUNICA TIONS , AND NTS COMMUNICATIONS, INC., APPELL EES On Appeal from the 237th District Court Lubbock County, Texas Trial Court No. 2016 - 520,098, Honorable Les Hatch, Presiding



### April 29 , 2019 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE , JJ. A ppellant , ACRS 2000 Corp., has filed an unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss its appeal. 1 Without passing on the merits of the case , we grant the motion pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a) (1) and dismiss the appeal . Having dismissed

1 We previously severed and dismissed the appeal of Pride Network, Inc. d/b/a NTS Communications and NTS Communications , Inc . See Pride Network , Inc. v. ACRS 2000 Corp ., Nos. 07 - 19 - 00004 - CV & 07 - 19 - 00144 - CV, 2019 Tex. App. LEXIS 3261, at *1 (Tex. App. — Amarillo Apr. 23, 2019, order) (per curiam).2

the appeal at appellant ’s request , no motion for rehearing will be entertained , and our mand ate will issue forthwith. It is so ordered. Per Curiam
Argued and submitted October 1,

vacated in part; otherwise affirmed November 24, 1999

#### PETER HART BERGERON, *Appellant, v.*Dan JOHNSON, Superintendent, Snake River Correctional Institution, *Respondent.*

(951127670M; CA A103179)

991 P2d 577

Peter Hart Bergeron filed the briefs *pro se.*

Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General, and Denise G. Fjordbeck, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before De Muniz, Presiding Judge, and Haselton and Wollheim, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Judgment imposing expenses and compensation for court-appointed attorney in amount of $1,982.99 vacated; otherwise affirmed. *See Alexander v. Johnson,*164 Or App 235, 990 P2d 929 (1999).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         134,170
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                12,997
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    985,799
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      4,950,520
<ALLOWANCE>                                     70,286
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,604,150
<DEPOSITS>                                   4,412,032
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,345,811
<LONG-TERM>                                     11,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           760
<OTHER-SE>                                     834,047
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               6,604,150
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                313,433
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               76,064
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                12,989
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               402,486
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             138,769
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             203,660
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          198,826
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    9,817
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             (1,716)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                119,890
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 86,035
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      86,035
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    53,246
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.90
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.90
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.03
<LOANS-NON>                                     12,218
<LOANS-PAST>                                    14,132
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                46,823
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      239
<RECOVERIES>                                     4,433
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               70,286
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            70,286
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
### BRANDYN WILLIAM GAYLER,

Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. No. 62612 

# FILED APR 0 9 2013

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) I947A
'41-1!



### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

TRACE K. LINDEMAN CLEVOMEWT kV t 4 ( DEPUTY CLERK 

### ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is an appeal from a district court order denying a motion to reconsider revocation of probation. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Jerome T. Tao, Judge.

We ordered appellant's counsel to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed because no statute or court rule authorizes an appeal from an order denying reconsideration. See Phelps v. State, 111 Nev. 1021, 1022, 900 P.2d 344, 345 (1995); Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). In response, counsel asserts that this court has jurisdiction because the motion filed below sought to modify the sentence imposed after revocation of probation. The record before this court does not establish that appellant sought to modify his sentence and it does not appear that the district court treated the motion for reconsideration as a motion to modify. Because appellant has failed to BYo

ci.ot Parraguirre ,J. establish this court's jurisdiction, we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 

# A ct_A. t/ezAt'N ,J. Hardesty

cc: Hon. Jerome T. Tao, District Judge Turco & Draskovich Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

2

1,14
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Exhibit 24.4


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, the person whose signature appears
below constitutes and appoints Yehoram Uziel attorney-in-fact, for him, with the
power of substitution, in any and all capacities, to sign the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 for 1,500,000 shares issuable under the Soligen
Technologies, Inc. 1993 Stock Option Plan, as amended, and any amendments to
such Registration Statement (including post-effective amendments), and to file
exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorney-in-fact full power and
authority to do or perform each and every act and thing requisite or necessary
to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he
might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorney-in-fact or substitute may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue
hereof.


                                             /s/ Darryl J. Yea
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Darryl J. Yea
Editorial Note on Part 180
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 180 appear at 79 FR 75879, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 180.45 Do these guidelines cover persons who are disqualified, as well as those who are excluded from nonprocurement transactions? A Federal agency may add a subpart covering disqualifications to its regulation implementing these guidelines, but the guidelines in subparts A through I of this part— ( a ) Address disqualified persons only to— ( 1 ) Provide for their inclusion in SAM Exclusions; and
( 2 ) State responsibilities of Federal agencies and participants to check for disqualified persons before entering into covered transactions.
( b ) Do not specify the— ( 1 ) Transactions for which a disqualified person is ineligible. Those transactions vary on a case-by-case basis, because they depend on the language of the specific statute, Executive order or regulation that caused the disqualification;
( 2 ) Entities to which a disqualification applies; or
( 3 ) Process that a Federal agency uses to disqualify a person. Unlike exclusion under subparts A through I of this part, disqualification is frequently not a discretionary action that a Federal agency takes, and may include special procedures.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

June 26, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 132671 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 132671 

 COA: 270244 

Washtenaw CC: 97-009476-FC 

ARLANDUS M. NOLEN,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 9, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

d0618 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 26, 2007 

 Clerk
### Effects of coal mining on the water resources of the Tradewater River Basin, Kentucky

By: Hayes F. GrubbPaul D. Ryder

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1940

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

         As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in this registration statement of our report dated
March 2, 1999, included in A-Fem Medical Corporation's Form 10-KSB for the year
ended December 31, 1998, and to all references to our Firm included in this
registration statement.

Portland, Oregon
June 25, 1999                             /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP