alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 31992R3550 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31992R3550

**Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3550/92 of 9 December 1992 amending Regulation (EEC) No 3149/92 laying down detailed rules for the supply of food from intervention stocks for the benefit of the most deprived persons in the Community **

*
Official Journal L 361 , 10/12/1992 P. 0019 - 0020 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 46 P. 0114 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 46 P. 0114 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EEC) No 3550/92 of 9 December 1992 amending Regulation (EEC) No 3149/92 laying down detailed rules for the supply of food from intervention stocks for the benefit of the most deprived persons in the Community

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 3730/87 of 10 December 1987 laying down the general rules for the supply of food from intervention stocks to designated organizations for distribution to the most deprived persons in the Community (1), and in particular Article 6 thereof,

Whereas Articles 6 and 7 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3149/92 (2) fix the standard rates serving as a basis for the reimbursement of the costs of transport of the products to be distributed to the most deprived persons in the Community; whereas, different rates should be fixed for transport in refrigerated and non-refrigerated vehicles; whereas Annex II to that Regulation should be amended accordingly; whereas this measure must take effect on the date of entry into force of Regulation (EEC) No 3149/92;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of all the relevant Management Committees,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex II to Regulation (EEC) No 3149/92 is hereby replaced by the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

It shall apply from 1 October 1992. This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 December 1992. For the Commission

Ray MAC SHARRY

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 352, 15. 12. 1987, p. 1. (2) OJ No L 313, 30. 10. 1992, p. 50.

ANNEX

'ANNEX II

TRANSPORT COSTS

Beef, butter and other products (refrigerated transport):

- for the first 200 kilometres: ECU 20,00/tonne,

- for each additional kilometre over 200: ECU 0,05/tonne.

Cereals and rice:

- for the first 200 kilometres: ECU 5,50/tonne,

- for each additional kilometre over 200: ECU 0,02/tonne.

Olive oil:

- for the first 200 kilometres: ECU 20,00/tonne,

- for each additional kilometre over 200: ECU 0,04/tonne.

Milk powder:

- for the first 200 kilometres: ECU 10,00/tonne,

- for each additional kilometre over 200: ECU 0,04/tonne.

Other products:

- for the first 200 kilometres: ECU 6,00/tonne,

- for each additional kilometre over 200: ECU 0,03/tonne.'.
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- Directorate Identifier:

- AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into and then ou t of the changed cell

.

**Estimated Costs:**

Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- hours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

cost (@$8 5 / h our) Parts Cost Total Costs (labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet



### Inspect ion 2 .0 $ 170.00 $0 $ 170.00 

### 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0. 00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00



### The known number of products in compliance: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 0 

### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $

**On**

**- Condition Costs:** 

Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- hours

(include access, testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00



### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warra nty costs) 

### : 

### N/A

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES * NO

* Explanation: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:**

Is the AD significant?

YES * NO

* Explanation: **Regulatory Flexibility Act:**

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO Explanation:

**Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:**

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to inclu de specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES * NO



### * Explanation 

### :
§ 26.67 Suspension of listed conformity assessment bodies. The following procedures shall apply with regard to the suspension of a conformity assessment body (CAB) listed in subpart B of this part. ( a ) A party shall notify the other party of its contestation of the technical competence or compliance of a CAB listed in subpart B of this part and the contesting party's intent to suspend such CAB. Such contestation shall be exercised when justified in an objective and reasoned manner in writing to the other party;
( b ) The CAB shall be given prompt notice by the other party and an opportunity to present information in order to refute the contestation or to correct the deficiencies which form the basis of the contestation;
( c ) Any such contestation shall be discussed between the parties in the Joint Sectoral Committee described in subpart B of this part. If there is no Joint Sectoral Committee, the contesting party shall refer the matter directly to the Joint Committee. If agreement to suspend is reached by the Joint Sectoral Committee or, if there is no Joint Sectoral Committee, by the Joint Committee, the CAB shall be suspended;
( d ) Where the Joint Sectoral Committee or Joint Committee decides that verification of technical competence or compliance is required, it shall normally be carried out in a timely manner by the party in whose territory the body in question is located, but may be carried out jointly by the parties in justified cases;
( e ) If the matter has not been resolved by the Joint Sectoral Committee within 10 days of the notice of contestation, the matter shall be referred to the Joint Committee for a decision. If there is no Joint Sectoral Committee, the matter shall be referred directly to the Joint Committee. If no decision is reached by the Joint Committee within 10 days of the referral to it, the CAB shall be suspended upon the request of the contesting party;
( f ) Upon the suspension of a CAB listed in subpart B of this part, a party is no longer obligated to accept or recognize the results of conformity assessment procedures performed by that CAB subsequent to suspension. A party shall continue to accept the results of conformity assessment procedures performed by that CAB prior to suspension, unless a regulatory authority of the party decides otherwise based on health, safety or environmental considerations or failure to satisfy other requirements within the scope of subpart B of this part; and
( g ) The suspension shall remain in effect until agreement has been reached by the parties upon the future status of that body.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

LINDA GUILLERMINA PEDROZA

,

Appellant,

v.

TENET HEALTHCARE CORP.,

Appellee

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 6

- 00 221

- C V

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 5

of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 2015CCV01210 )

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is the Third J oint Motion to Continue Abatement. T he motion

is GRANTED. We therefore extend the abatement until April 18 , 201 7 . The parties shall file

their motion to dismiss the appeal or their motion for continuation of abatement on or before

April 18, 2017

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 2 nd d ay of March , 20 1 7

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox , JJ.
§ 182.1045 Glutamic acid. ( a ) *Product.* Glutamic acid.
( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) *Limitations, restrictions, or explanation.* This substance is generally recognized as safe when used as a salt substitute in accordance with good manufacturing practice.
§ 182.6285 Dipotassium phosphate. ( a ) *Product.* Dipotassium phosphate.
( b ) *Conditions of use.* This substance is generally recognized as safe when used in accordance with good manufacturing practice.
§ 186.1316 Formic acid. ( a ) Formic acid (CH2O2, CAS Reg. No. 64-18-6) is also referred to as methanoic acid or hydrogen carboxylic acid. It occurs naturally in some insects and is contained in the free acid state in a number of plants. Formic acid is prepared by the reaction of sodium formate with sulfuric acid and is isolated by distillation.
( b ) Formic acid is used as a constituent of paper and paperboard used for food packaging.
( c ) The ingredient is used at levels not to exceed good manufacturing practice in accordance with § 186.1(b)(1).
( d ) Prior sanctions for formic acid different from the uses established in this section do not exist or have been waived.
[45 FR 22915, Apr. 4, 1980]
BY: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
JOSEPH MILLS, AN INDIVIDUA; AND PEGGY MILLS, AN INDIVIDUAL, Appellants, vs. SUPERIOR TRAFFIC SERVICES CORP., Respondent. No., 84523 FO R L OCT 2 2022 aiita 11A. BROM OF UPR ,M C EPUTYCA.EP.7

- ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL ASABANDONED After the settlementjudge reported that the parties had agreed to a settlement, this court entered an order directing appellants to file a stipulation or motion to dismiss this appeal or otherwise inform this court of the status of this appeal within 30 days. To date, appellants have not responded to our order or otherwise communicated with this court. Accordingly, cause appearing, we dismiss this appeal as abandoned.

It is so ORDERED. CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT ELIZABETH A. BROWN

cc: Hon. Joseph Hardy, Jr., District Judge John Walter Boyer, Settlement Judge Clear Counsel Law Group Springel & Fink, LLP Lemons, Grundy & Eisenberg Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA CLERK'S ORDER

1.11- 1947
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned, Stephen I. Sadove, Chief Executive Officer of Saks Incorporated (the Company), has
executed this certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 1, 2008 (the Report).

The undersigned hereby certifies that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 2ndday of December, 2008.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Stephen I. Sadove  
|Stephen I. Sadove      
|Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Saks Incorporated
and will be retained by Saks Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
## Breadcrumb

-  Climate Adaptation Science Centers 

#           CASC Network Annual Reports      

      By Climate Adaptation Science Centers

## 2023 Year in Review

### Explore the accomplishments of the CASC network and its partners for the fiscal year 2023.

Explore

-  Home 
-  Science 
-  Data 
-  Multimedia 
-  Publications 
-  Web Tools 
-  News 
-  Connect 
-  Partners 
-  About 

Each year, the CASC Network develops a comprehensive annual report highlighting particularly successful and interesting activities from across the network that have occurred over the past year. Explore our past annual reports below.

**2023 Annual CASC Summary (Interactive)**2022 Annual CASC Summary (Interactive)2021 Annual CASC Summary (Interactive)2020 Annual CASC Summary (Interactive)2019 Annual CASC Spotlight Series2018 CASC Network Annual Report2017 CASC Network Annual Report2016 CASC Network Annual Report2015 CASC Network Annual Report 2014 CASC Network Annual Report2013 CASC Network Annual Report2012 CASC Network Annual Report2011 CASC Network Annual Report

 

**Notes:***Program name: *The Climate Adaptation Science Centers were formerly known as the Climate Science Centers (CSCs). The name of the centers changed in March 2018; as such, some reports refer to the centers as "CSCs" as opposed to "CASCs". Similarly, the National CASC was formerly known as the National Climate Change & Wildlife Science Center (NCCWSC).

*Midwest CASC:*The Midwest CASC was established in 2021, and therefore is not included in prior CASC network annual reports.
###### Editorial Note on Part 178

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 178 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 70 FR 72074, Dec. 1, 2005; and 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

#### § 178.3300 Corrosion inhibitors used for steel or tinplate.

Corrosion inhibitors may be safely used for steel or tinplate intended for use in, or to be fabricated as, food containers or food-processing or handling equipment, subject to the provisions of this section.

(a) The corrosion inhibitors are prepared from substances identified in this section and used subject to the limitations prescribed.

(b) The following corrosion inhibitors or adjuvants are used in amounts not to exceed those reasonably required to accomplish the intended physical or technical effect:

(1) Corrosion inhibitors (active ingredients) used in packaging materials for the packaging of steel or tinplate or articles fabricated therefrom:

| List of substances | Limitations |
| --- | --- |
| Dicyclohexylamine and its salts of fatty acids derived from animal or vegetable oil | |
| Dicyclohexylamine nitrite | |
| Morpholine and its salts of fatty acids derived from animal or vegetable oils | |

(2) Adjuvants employed in the application and use of corrosion inhibitors:

| List of substances | Limitations |
| --- | --- |
| Propylene glycol | |
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ANTHONY TAYLOR

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 1017

[ July 18, 2019 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Laura Johnson , Judge;

L.T. Case No. 1992CF014834

.

Anthony Taylor, Crawfordville, pro se.

No appearance filed for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

M AY

, D AMOORGIAN

, and G ERBER

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1



                  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in this registration of Form S-8 of our report dated May 26, 1998
included in Soligen Technologies, Inc. Form 10KSB for the year ended March 31,
1998 and to all references to our Firm included in this registration statement.


                                              /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

                                                ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP




Los Angeles, California
August 21, 1998
---

---

Exhibit 14.2

# CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of NUR Macroprinters Ltd. on Form S-8 (File
Nos. 333-102288 and 333-92491) and Form F-3 (File Nos. 333-115826, 333-114428, 333-47842 and 333-92493) of our report
dated June 2, 2005 relating to the financial statements of NUR Asia Pacific Limited for the year ended 31 December 2004
with respect to the Consolidated Financial Statements of NUR Macroprinters Ltd., included in its annual report on Form
20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

/s/ BDO McCabe Lo & Company
BDO McCabe Lo & Company
Certified Public Accountants
July 13, 2005



---

---
[No. 39570-0-I.

Division One.

December 22, 1997.]

#### The City of Seattle, *Respondent,*v. Jarray White, *Petitioner.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 95-1-04888-5, Ricardo S. Martinez, J., entered September 26, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Editorial Note on Part 172
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 172 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; 70 FR 72074, Dec. 1, 2005; and 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 172.623 Carrageenan with polysorbate 80. Carrageenan otherwise meeting the definition and specifications of § 172.620 (a) and (b) and salts of carrageenan otherwise meeting the definition of § 172.626(a) may be safely produced with the use of polysorbate 80 meeting the specifications and requirements of § 172.840 (a) and (b) in accordance with the following prescribed conditions: ( a ) The polysorbate 80 is used only to facilitate separation of sheeted carrageenan and salts of carrageenan from drying rolls.
( b ) The carrageenan and salts of carrageenan contain not more than 5 percent by weight of polysorbate 80, and the final food containing the additives contains polysorbate 80 in an amount not to exceed 500 parts per million.
( c ) The carrageenan and salts of carrageenan so produced are used only in producing foods in gel form and only for the purposes defined in §§ 172.620(c) and 172.626(b), respectively.
( d ) The carrageenan and salts of carrageenan so produced are not used in foods for which standards of identity exist unless the standards provide for the use of carrageenan, or salts of carrageenan, combined with polysorbate 80.
( e ) The carrageenan and salts of carrageenan produced in accordance with this section, and foods containing the same, in addition to the other requirements of the Act, are labeled to show the presence of polysorbate 80, and the label or labeling of the carrageenan and salts of carrageenan so produced bear adequate directions for use.
Exhibit








Exhibit 4.2
 
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO REGISTRATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT
 
Overstock.com, Inc., a Delaware corporation and Patrick M. Byrne, individually and in his representative capacity under the Registration Rights Agreement dated December 15, 2016 to which they are parties, hereby amend the Registration Rights Agreement as set forth below. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings given them in the Registration Rights Agreement.


1.    The definitions of “Effectiveness Date” and “Filing Date” in Article 1 are amended to read as follows:


“Effectiveness Date” means (1) with respect to a registration effected pursuant to Section 2.1, the 210th calendar day following the Closing Date, and (2) with respect to a registration effected pursuant to Section 2.2, the 120th calendar day following the receipt of the applicable Registration Request; provided, however, that, in either case, if the Effectiveness Date falls on a day that is not a Business Day, then the Effectiveness Date shall be extended to the next Business Day.


“Filing Date” means (1) with respect to a registration effected pursuant to Section 2.1, the 180th calendar day following the Closing Date, and (2) with respect to a registration effected pursuant to Section 2.2, the 90th calendar day following the receipt of a Registration Request; provided, however, that, in either case, if the Filing Date falls on a day that is not a Business Day, then the Filing Date shall be extended to the next Business Day.


2.    The Company’s zip code as shown in Section 6.3 is hereby amended to read as follows: “84047”.


3.    Patrick M. Byrne, as the Holder of 100% of all Registrable Securities outstanding, hereby consents to the foregoing amendments to the Registration Rights Agreement.  


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment No. 1 to Registration Rights Agreement to be duly executed effective March 10, 2017.
	
			
	 
	OVERSTOCK.COM, INC.

	 
	 

	 
	 

	 
	By:
	/s/ E. GLEN NICKLE

	 
	Name:
	E. Glen Nickle

	 
	Title:
	Vice President, Legal and acting General Counsel




 
 
	
			
	 
	PATRICK M. BYRNE,

	 
	Individually and in his capacity as Representative of each of the Participating Affiliates

	 
	 

	 
	 

	 
	/s/ PATRICK M. BYRNE

	 
	Patrick M. Byrne
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 23.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to incorporation by reference into Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc.'s
Registration Statement on Form S-3, File No. 333-21273 (the "Registration
Statement") of our report dated February 27, 1998, which is included in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 1997. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading
"Experts" in the Prospectus dated February 20, 1997 which is a part of the
Registration Statement.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Seattle, Washington
December 3, 1998