alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered November 30, 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 16
- 00861
- CR
TERRANCE JARMELL DUN N, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 2 65th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F14
- 17929
- R



### O RDER
We REINSTATE this appeal. On November 2, 2016, we granted the State’s motion and ordered the trial court to make written findings of fact and conclusions of law on the admissibility of appellant’s oral statement as mandated by section 6 of article 38.22. See T EX
. C ODE C RIM
. P ROC
. A NN
. art. 38.22, § 6 (West Supp. 2016). On November 21, 2016, a supplemental clerk’s record containing the written findings of fact and c onclusions of law was filed with this Court.
We GRANT the State’s November 29, 2016 motion to extend time to file the State’s brief , and ORDER the State’s brief received on November 23, 2016 filed as of the date of thisorder.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTIC E
# EUR-Lex - 31994D0317 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31994D0317

**94/317/EC: Council Decision of 2 June 1994 authorizing the Kingdom of Spain to extend until 7 March 1995 the Agreement on mutual fishery relations with the Republic of South Africa **

*
Official Journal L 142 , 07/06/1994 P. 0030 - 0030 Finnish special edition: Chapter 4 Volume 6 P. 0071 Swedish special edition: Chapter 4 Volume 6 P. 0071 *

COUNCIL DECISION of 2 June 1994 authorizing the Kingdom of Spain to extend until 7 March 1995 the Agreement on mutual fishery relations with the Republic of South Africa (94/317/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to the Act of Accession of Spain and Portugal, and in particular Article 167 (3) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Whereas the Agreement on mutual fishery relations between the Government of the Kingdom of Spain and the Government of the Republic of South Africa, signed on 14 August 1979, entered into force on 8 March 1982 for an initial period of 10 years; whereas the Agreement remains in force for an indeterminate period if it is not denounced by the giving of 12 months' notice;

Whereas Article 167 (2) of the Act of Accession laying down that the rights and obligations flowing, for the Kingdom of Spain, from fisheries agreements concluded with third countries, shall not be affected during the period for which the provisions of such agreements are provisionally maintained;

Whereas, pursuant to Article 167 (3) of the said Act, the Council is to adopt, before the expiry of the fisheries agreements concluded by the Kingdom of Spain with third countries, decisions appropriate for the continuation of fishing activities resulting therefrom, including the possibility of prolonging for periods not exceeding one year; whereas the abovementioned Agreement has been extended until 7 March 1994 (1);

Whereas, in order to avoid fishing by the Community vessels concerned being interrupted, it appears appropriate to authorize the Kingdom of Spain to renew the Agreement in question until 7 March 1995,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Kingdom of Spain is hereby authorized to extend until 7 March 1995 the Agreement on mutual fishery relations with the Republic of South Africa which entered into force on 8 March 1982.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Spain.

Done at Luxembourg, 2 June 1994.

For the Council

The President

D. KREMASTINOS

(1) OJ No L 88, 8. 4. 1993, p. 45.
Subject: Meeting with Earthjustice and the Natural Resources Defense Council Regarding Secondary Lead Smelting and Primary Lead Smelting Residual Risk and Technology Review s

Date: October 7 , 2011

Participants:

Earthjustice

Emma Chause

James Pew

Natu ral Resources Defense Council (NRDC)

Jane Williams

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA ) Nathan Topham

Steven Silverman

Chuck French

Summary:

A meeting was held between members of the EPA and representatives of Earthjustice and NRDC

to discuss the proposed secondary and primary lead residual risk and technology reviews (RTRs). The EPA provided clarification of the requirements included in the primary and secondary lead RTR proposals.

Representatives of Earthjustice and NRDC highlight ed a number of issues raised in their public comments and urged the EPA to take action in response to those comments. The following issues were raised by Earthjustice and NRDC during the meeting:

• The proposed rules did not follow the requirements of section 112 of t he Clean Air Act (CAA)

• The use of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) as a measure of risk is not protective enough because the NAAQS only requires an adequate margin of safety while section 112 requires an ample margin of safety

• The EPA sho uld have evaluated requirements that would prevent the loss of one IQ point

in children

• The EPA should have considered an ambient standard of 0.02 μg/m 3 averaged over one month, or a lower concentration

• The IEUBK model used to develop the NAAQS benchmark o f 0.15 μg/m 3
underestimates risk to children by underestimating soil ingestion rates and only using a 95% confidence interval that would not properly account for children living in close proximity to a lead smelter• Background levels of lead resulting from lead smelter emissions should be incorporated the risk assessments due to high blood lead levels that can occur from living/working in areas subject to contamination

• The EPA cannot consider cost or feasibility in determining whether risk is acceptable

• Adva nces in technology should have led to stricter standards under the section 112(d)(6) technology review

• The compliance dates for the rules should not exceed 90 days

• The South Coast Air Quality Management District rule for secondary lead smelters

should have been considered in this rule, specifically the hourly emission limit and averaging time for the ambient standard

• Section 112(d)(6) requires the EPA to satisfy section 112(d)’s requirement that the standards must reflect the best performers in a category

• T he EPA must consider environmental justice in the decision making process

• The EPA must set a numerical standard for mercury from secondary lead smelters and standards for organic hazardous air pollutants (HAP) from primary lead smelters

• The EPA must use an uncertainty factor to account for early childhood exposure in risk

assessments

• The EPA must consider cumulative impacts beyond the source category being considered

• The EPA should add the results of the multipathway and inhalation risk assessments to

deter mine the level of risk
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-2067

SHEILA M. MARSHALL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND MEDICAL CENTER,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (1:17-cv-02779-TDC)

Submitted: February 24, 2022 Decided: March 15, 2022

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sheila M. Marshall, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas William Desmarais, Kerstin Marie Miller, 

SMITH & DOWNEY, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Sheila M. Marshall seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting summary 

judgment to Defendant on her civil complaint. In a civil case, a party must file a notice of 

appeal within 30 days of the judgment or order being appealed, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), 

unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens 

the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal 

in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court entered judgment on August 31, 2020. Marshall therefore had 

until September 30, 2020, to file a notice of appeal. The district court filed Marshall’s 

appeal on October 2, 2020, outside of the appeal period. However, a court security officer 

stamp on the envelope creates some ambiguity as to when the district court clerk received 

Marshall’s notice of appeal. Accordingly, we remand the case to allow the district court to 

determine the date on which Marshall filed the notice of appeal. 

Additionally, a district court may extend the appeal period under Rule 4(a)(5) if a 

party moves for an extension of time within 30 days of the expiration of the appeal period 

and shows excusable neglect or good cause. Marshall filed a letter on September 28, 2020, 

that we construe as a motion to extend the appeal period. If the district court determines 

that the district court clerk did not receive the notice of appeal within the appeal period, 

then the district court should then determine whether the requirements of Rule 4(a)(5) are 

satisfied. The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further 

consideration.

REMANDED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-27-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-25-2000
<CASH>                                             213
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   94,613
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,163
<INVENTORY>                                      2,844
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                62,407
<PP&E>                                          13,569
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,187
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 161,091
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,297
<BONDS>                                         84,287
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,868
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   161,091
<SALES>                                         30,154
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,020
<CGS>                                           13,165
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   30,855
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   535
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,308
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,277
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,493)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (710)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,783)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,783)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>THE COMPANY DOES NOT REPORT EPS AS THERE IS NO PUBLIC MARKET FOR ITS EQUITY.
THE COMPANY DOES HAVE PUBLICLY OWNED DEBT.
</FN>


</TABLE>
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 2591

_____________________________
M ARQUIS A NTONIO C ORBITT , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Co urt for Alachua County

. Mark W. Moseley , Judge

. January 16, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , W ETHERELL , and W INOKUR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.3 30 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Marquis Antonio Corbitt, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody , Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
#### § 20.51 Referral to primary source of records.

Upon receipt of a request for a record or document which is contained in Food and Drug Administration files but which is available elsewhere at a lower cost, the person requesting the record or document shall be referred to the primary source of the record or document.

[42 FR 15616, Mar. 22, 1977. Redesignated at 68 FR 25286, May 12, 2003]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [LLWO620000.L18200000.XH0000]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of reestablishment of Resource Advisory Councils.

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given that the Secretary of the Interior (Secretary) has reestablished the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Resource Advisory Councils for the States of Alaska, California, Colorado, Montana/Dakotas, New Mexico, Oregon/Washington, and Utah.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Allison Sandoval, Legislative Affairs and Correspondence (600), Bureau of Land Management, 1620 L Street, NW., MS-LS-401, Washington, DC 20036, telephone (202) 912-7434.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This notice is published in accordance with Section 9(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972, Public Law 92-463. The BLM has renewed the Alaska, Northwestern California, Northeastern California, Central California, Colorado Front Range, Southwest Colorado, Northwest Colorado, Central Montana, Eastern Montana, Western Montana, Dakotas, New Mexico, Southeast Oregon, Eastern Washington, John Day-Snake, and Utah Resource Advisory Councils.

*Certification Statement:*                     I hereby certify that the reestablishment of the BLM Resource Advisory Councils is necessary and in the public interest in connection with the Secretary's responsibilities to manage the lands, resources, and facilities administered by the BLM.                

Ken Salazar,

Secretary of the Interior.

[FR Doc. 2010-34 Filed 1-6-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
§ 251.1 Scope of the part. ( a ) This part sets forth the procedures that Section 804 Importation Program sponsors (SIP Sponsors) must follow when submitting plans to implement time-limited programs to begin importation of drugs from Canada under section 804 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. This part also sets forth certain requirements that are necessary for such programs to be authorized by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Additionally, this part sets forth requirements for eligible prescription drugs and requirements for entities that engage in importation of eligible prescription drugs.
( b ) This part includes provisions that exempt eligible prescription drugs that meet certain requirements from section 502(f)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. This part also includes provisions that exempt certain transactions involving eligible prescription drugs from certain requirements in section 582 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
§ 203.11 Applications for reimportation to provide emergency medical care. ( a ) Applications for reimportation for emergency medical care shall be submitted to the director of the FDA District Office in the district where reimportation is sought (addresses found in part 5, subpart M of this chapter).
( b ) Applications for reimportation to provide emergency medical care shall be reviewed and approved or disapproved by each district office.
[64 FR 67756, Dec. 3, 1999, as amended at 69 FR 17292, Apr. 2, 2004]
##### 



Exhibit 10.23
 Ixys Corporation  1999 Equity Incentive Plan
 Stock Option Agreement
 (Incentive
and Nonstatutory Stock Options)
   1. Vesting.
 2. Number of Shares and Exercise Price.
 3. Method of Payment. permitted by your Grant Notice,
 (i) The Wall Street
Journal
 (ii)




---



##### 



(iii) The Wall Street Journal
 4. Whole Shares.
 5. Securities Law Compliance.
 6. Term.
 (i)
 (ii)
 (iii)
 (iv)
 (v)




---



##### 



7. Exercise.
 (i)
 (ii)
 8. Transferability.
 9. Option not a Service Contract.
 10. Withholding Obligations.
 (i)




---



##### 



(ii)
 (iii)
 11. Notices.
 12. Governing Plan Document.




---



##### 



Ixys Corporation  1999 Equity Incentive Plan  Stock Option Grant Notice
  Optionholder:Date of Grant:Vesting Commencement Date:Number of Shares Subject to Option:Exercise Price (Per Share):Total Exercise Price:Expiration Date:1
 Type of Grant:
    
     ̈  Incentive Stock Option2
    
     ̈  Nonstatutory Stock OptionExercise Schedule:
    
    Same as Vesting Schedule,Vesting Schedule:
    
    .Payment:
    
    By one or a combination of the following items (described in Section 3 of the Stock Option Agreement): ̈    By cash or check; ̈    At the discretion of the Company, pursuant to a Regulation T Program if the Shares are publicly traded; ̈    At the discretion of the Company, through a net exercise; ̈    At the discretion of the Company, by delivery of already-owned shares if the Shares are publicly traded.
 Additional Terms/Acknowledgements:
 Other Agreements:
 Ixys Corporation
    
    Optionholder:By:Signature
    
    SignatureTitle:
    
    
    
    Date:Date:
 Attachments
 
 1
    
    Subject to earlier termination as
provided in Section 6 of the Option Agreement.2
    
    If this is an Incentive Stock Option, it (plus
other outstanding Incentive Stock Options) cannot be first exercisable
for more than $100,000 in value (measured by exercise price) in any calendar
year. Any excess over $100,000 is a Nonstatutory Stock Option.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent certified public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of our report dated January 24, 2000 on the
consolidated financial statements of SportsLine.com, Inc. and subsidiaries into
the Company's previously filed registration statements on Form S-3 (Registration
Nos. 333-62685 and 333-78921) and Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-46021,
333-46023, 333-46029, 333-57821, 333-33650 and 333-33654).

Arthur Andersen LLP


Fort Lauderdale, Florida
  May 5, 2000.
Exhibit 32

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Matthew  Harriton,  President,  Principal  Executive and Financial Officer of
Embryo Development Corp. (the "Company"), certify pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 USC Section 1350, that:

     1.   The Company's  Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended April
          30,  2005 (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  as
          amended; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                              By:     /s/ Matthew Harriton
                                      Matthew Harriton, President
                                     (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)

Dated: August 13, 2005
## FLORIDA SUPREME COURT

NOTICE OF CORRECTION

DATE: April 2, 2020

CASE OF: IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF JUDICIAL

ADMINISTRATION, THE FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL

PROCEDURE, AND THE FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL

PROCEDURE

— STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS

DOCKET NO.: SC 20

- 145 OPINION FILED: March 5 , 2020

ATTENTION: ALL PUBLISHERS

THE FOLLOWING CORRECTION S HA VE BEEN MADE IN THE ABOVE

OPINION:

On p

. 1, line 6, “2.570” has been changed to “2. 5 80

. ”

On p. 10, line 5, “2.570” has been changed to “2. 5 80

. ”

On p. 11, lines 1 and 4 of the last paragraph, “2.570” ha s been changed to “2. 5 80

. ”

On p. 12, lines 8 and 12, “2.570” ha ve been changed to “2. 5 80

. ”

On p. 13, lines 5, 7, 9, and 1 3

, “2.570” ha ve been changed to “2. 5 80

. ”

On p. 15, line 4 of Rule 1.470(b), “2.570” has been changed to “2. 5 80

. ”

On p. 18, line 2 of Rule 2.270(b)(4), “2.570” has been changed to “2. 5 80

. ”

On p. 18, la st heading, “ RULE 2.570” has been changed to “ RULE 2. 5 80

. ”

On p. 1 9 , line 3 of Rule 3.390(a), “2.570” has been changed to “2. 5 80

. ”

SIGNED: OPINION CLERK
§ 1316.65 Report and record. ( a ) As soon as practicable after the time for the parties to file proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law has expired, the presiding officer shall prepare a report containing the following: ( 1 ) His recommended rulings on the proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law;
( 2 ) His recommended findings of fact and conclusions of law, with the reasons therefore; and
( 3 ) His recommended decision.
( b ) The presiding officer shall serve a copy of his report upon each party in the hearing. The report shall be considered to have been served when it is mailed to such party or its attorney of record.
( c ) Not less than twenty-five days after the date on which he caused copies of his report to be served upon the parties, the presiding officer shall certify to the Administrator the record, which shall contain the transcript of testimony, exhibits, the findings of fact and conclusions of law proposed by the parties, the presiding officer's report, and any exceptions thereto which may have been filed by the parties.
[36 FR 7778, Apr. 24, 1971. Redesignated at 38 FR 26609, Sept. 24, 1973 and amended at 44 FR 55332, Sept. 26, 1979]