alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
July 30, 2014 Clean Power Plants/Carbon Pollution Emission Guidelines for Existing 

# A ) I I**~·** I Stationary Sources and Standards for Modified and Reconstructed Stationary Sources: EGUs Atlanta, GA Registration/Sign-up Sheet Time Number Name 9:15 1 ' 

# Vt i \Cl<\

## ~\(t.\'i'\ 9:20 2 

# I ' -

# ---*~**c~(**

# t;~j 

# Ckvrt9:25 3 

## (Y!cnK 

# U>lL5hll 0/**~** 9:30 4 

### Lft

# Vi~**f(~cY-:;** 9:35 5

# ~l~**\)~01\** 9:40 6 

### L..J.cuJ..f'e I") 

# Po<Z.. 9:45 7

# j~hn DuJYlM 9:50 8 

## C) 

# ·.'15 

# joJY10 

# rnut.efl9:55 9 

# VtGK \ 

## -..) JrYl 10:00 10 

# 611 CU11/1 

## c!}Y) 

# p S 0Y\ 10:05 11

# (lfhJt?~ L,\J 

# bo cDd (1-f\ 10:10 12 

### '

# C__r~ 

# br 1 

# /1\Jl.

# .. 10:15 13 ,, -,;.,·

# ~·~\- Cd.') ( Cy" 10:20 14 

# Gt VIc\ 1.-<Ll'Yl

## ~,rf 10:25 15

# ~t\ 

# &·

. J<. 

### l'i-v\Clf) 10:30 16 

### Kc\rlc.Ulf..Y<.l:;. 

# Gcf-5 ( i\_ 10:40 17

# J)J~ 

# kwYI m.Q**)~·1** 

# ck 10:45 18

## (V~.tn 

# s l 

## tl n._ 

## C\

# ~(,,**-~1** 

# tN RcKl/() 10:50 19 

# r< <t.t1c·) , }

# t~ i r 

# I 10:55 20

# K.,nct~(\1- rY/(nftt 0 

# J\1 :Jf r 

### f\ 

# f\ c \JYli' 11:00 21 

# .j L 

### \?tHL 

# k,**t~** 

# cvf.. 11:05 22**~** ' 

# L.oJ[ t__o 1 

### rr·L9- 

## (r / 

# t+cu lc 

# ! 11:10 23

## ~ f\c\} l 

## 2c\Y'I''} I 11:15 24 

# bill \) CY' 

## J\i!

# (~ 11:20 25

# Kcu~\.1/,{ l.U-t 

# ll 11:25 26

# \:\)cd~**+u~** 

# r (!. 

# t'·/[ 

# u -. 11:30 27

# v~~l'j 1r 1 l ' 

# &l11K 

# bfc.-V\

# • 11:35 11:40 11:45 11:50 11:55 LUNCH 12-1; reading opening statements 1:00-1:15 1:15 1:20 28 

# (f) ...**:\kc:~{** n. 

# kLH1lbtlt--

31 32

33 - 

# :t \ s*-**~,~ cu~ll/5**  34 

# -G**~F'** 

# rnwAa 1:25 1:30 1:35 1:40 1:45 1:50 1:55 

# A

## ' 2:00 

# t.fi! 4 

# bictR . (cj ft 

# t. ,_... - 

# ·un l ,.(V 2:05 

# <.J0 43



# V\:1'Y\~fi 

# \l>ll11D {' 2:10 

# @ 44 

# Dj 01.n C__D\eDr'"" 2:15 

# tfY 45 

# q

__ \ (/Jt

**~ge,-{-\.1** 

# II\ l(:J 

# vr:.,s 2:20 

# @ 46



### -rn~'S 

# ?:f..\J0( ' 1- 2:25 

# cif> 47 

# 0(iu (\L, 

# s-oooy 2:30 

# 4LJ 48 

### <:!!;:/ 

# 0Jdl (_ Vlo&J._J 

# h 2:35 

# 0J) 49 

# t{)JQn 

# S \.w.a

**~ ~**  2:40 

# CJ!j) 50 

# 'Wd.(

**NCl~~((()** 2:45 

# @ 51 

## I' IJ \ 

## i+> QJ\ 

## V---- 

# 'eY (().(' 2:50 

# c!PJ 52 

# p..,\w+- (U)est:! 2:55 

# ,r;v 53



# ~ \



# r\~ '\ 1 

# c,hc\ 

# "\he:·rd--\ 3:00 

## @) 54 

# ,..... 

# \/'lu Q-c

**·~** **f~*"Yl** 3:05 

# C-- 55 

# \ Jv C·1..

**~** 

# (!COCk\ 3:10 

# C§P 56 

## J -J



# ~:XXI (\( (\Cllf\ ' ' ..J

# A 3:15 57 3:20 58 3:25 3:30 3:35 3:40 62 

# \\o-tt 3:45 63 3:50 3:55 4:00 4:05 4:10 4:15 4:20 4:254:50 4:55 5:00 Dinner Break 5pm 6:00 6:05 6:10 6:15 6:20 6:25 6:30 6:35 6:40 6pm; 76 

### J 77

78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86I • 6:45 87 6:50 88 6:55 89 7:00 90 7:05 91 7:10 92 7:15 93 7:20 94 7:25 95 7:30 96 7:35 97 7:40 98 7:45 99 7:50 100 7:55 101

- 

# ------------------------------------
Docket No. FAA-2013-0423
EXHIBIT 21
================================================================================
                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

The Company owns the following subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                   PERCENT
                                                                    VOTING                     JURISDICTION
NAME                                                              STOCK HELD                OF INCORPORATION
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<S>                                                                  <C>                         <C>
BankFirst (1)                                                        100%                        Tennessee

The First National Bank and Trust Company (2)                        100%                        United States

BankFirst Trust Company                                              100%                        Tennessee

(1)  BankFirst owns the following subsidiaries
     as of December 31, 1999:

         Curtis Mortgage Company, Inc.                               100%                        Tennessee

         Eastern Life Insurance Company, Inc.                        100%                        Tennessee

(2)  The First  National Bank and Trust Company owns
     the following  subsidiary as of December 31, 1999:

         Friendly Finance Company, Inc.                              100%                        Tennessee
</TABLE>
§ 1317.95 Destruction procedures. The destruction of any controlled substance shall be in accordance with the following requirements: ( a ) *Transfer to a person registered or authorized to accept controlled substances for the purpose of destruction.* If the controlled substances are transferred to a person registered or authorized to accept the controlled substances for the purpose of destruction, two employees of the transferring registrant shall load and unload or observe the loading and unloading of any controlled substances until transfer is complete.
( b ) *Transport to a registered location.* If the controlled substances are transported by a registrant to a registered location for subsequent destruction, the following procedures shall be followed: ( 1 ) Transportation shall be directly to the registered location (the substances shall be constantly moving towards their final location and unnecessary or unrelated stops and stops of an extended duration shall not occur);
( 2 ) Two employees of the transporting registrant shall accompany the controlled substances to the registered location;
( 3 ) Two employees of the transporting registrant shall load and unload or observe the loading and unloading of the controlled substances until transfer is complete;
( c ) *Transport to a non-registered location.* If the controlled substances are transported by a registrant to a destruction location that is not a registered location, the following procedures shall be followed: ( 1 ) Transportation shall be directly to the destruction location (the substances shall be constantly moving towards their final destruction location and unnecessary or unrelated stops and stops of an extended duration shall not occur);
( 2 ) Two employees of the transporting registrant shall accompany the controlled substances to the destruction location;
( 3 ) Two employees of the transporting registrant shall load and unload or observe the loading and unloading of the controlled substances;
( 4 ) Two employees of the transporting registrant shall handle or observe the handling of any controlled substance until the substance is rendered non-retrievable; and
( 5 ) Two employees of the transporting registrant shall personally witness the destruction of the controlled substance until it is rendered non-retrievable.
( d ) *On-site destruction.* If the controlled substances are destroyed at a registrant's registered location utilizing an on-site method of destruction, the following procedures shall be followed: ( 1 ) Two employees of the registrant shall handle or observe the handling of any controlled substance until the substance is rendered non-retrievable; and
( 2 ) Two employees of the registrant shall personally witness the destruction of the controlled substance until it is rendered non-retrievable.
§ 21.51 Responses to requests for amendment of records. ( a ) The Food and Drug Administration shall take one of the following actions on a request for amendment of records as promptly as possible: ( 1 ) Amend any portion of the record which the agency has determined, based upon a preponderance of the evidence, is not accurate, relevant to a Food and Drug Administration purpose, timely, or complete, and, in accordance with paragraph (d)(3) of this section, inform the individual and previous recipients of the record that has been amended of the amendment.
( 2 ) Inform the individual of its refusal to amend any portion of the record in the manner requested, the reason for the refusal, and the opportunity for administrative appeal to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs. Except as provided in § 21.32, such refusal may only be issued by the Associate Commissioner for Public Affairs or his or her designate.
( 3 ) Where another agency was the source of and has control of the record, refer the request to that agency.
( b ) The agency may, for good cause, extend the period for taking action an additional 30 working days if notice is provided to the individual explaining the circumstances of the delay.
( c ) The officials charged with reviewing a record to determine how to respond to a request to amend it, shall assess its accuracy, relevance to a Food and Drug Administration purpose, timeliness, or completeness. The determination shall be made in the light of the purpose for which the records or system is used, the agency's need for the record, and the possible adverse consequences to the individual from the record if not amended. Whenever the Food and Drug Administration receives a request for deletion of a record, or portions of a record, it shall consider anew whether the contested information in the record is relevant and necessary to a Food and Drug Administration purpose.
( d ) If the Food and Drug Administration agrees with an individual's request, it shall take the following actions: ( 1 ) So inform the individual in writing.
( 2 ) In accordance with statute, regulation, or procedure, amend the record to make it accurate, relevant to a Food and Drug Administration purpose, timely, or complete, making note of the date and fact of the amendment.
( 3 ) If an accounting was made under § 21.71(d) of a disclosure of the record under § 21.71(a), provide a copy of the record as amended, to all previous recipients of the record.
[42 FR 15626, Mar. 22, 1977, as amended at 46 FR 8459, Jan. 27, 1981]
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

LOUIE WISE

,

Appellant,

v.

623 RENTAL PROPERTIES, LLC,

as assignee of Seaside National Bank and Trust, and

CLASSIC AUTO HOLDINGS, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, Appellee s

.

No. 4D 18

- 659

[ March 14, 2019 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit,

Martin County ; Barbara W. Bronis , Judge; L.T. Case No. 43

- 2015

- CA

000445

.

Robert S. Gershman of Gershman & Gershman, P.A., Delray Beach, for

appellant.

Jef frey J. Saunders and Michael J. Cristoforo of Crary Buchanan, P.A.,

Stuart, for appellee , 623 Rental Properties, LLC

.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ERBER

, C.J., T AYLOR and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
[No. 40525-0-I.

Division One.

November 17, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. P.B.B., *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 96-8-08638-1, Marilyn R. Sellers, J., entered March 18, 1997. *Reversed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXA S NO. WR-82,239-03
EX P ARTE EYNEL AROLDO GUZ MAN, A ppl icant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. W219-81460-08-HC IN THE 219T H DISTRICT COURT

F ROM COLLIN COUNTY
Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisions of Ar t i cl e 1 1
. 07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Ap p l i ca n t was convicted of one count of ag g rava ted sexual assault of a child and one count of indece ncy with a child and sentenc ed to twenty
five year s’ and fiftee n y ear s’ imprisonment, r espec tively
. The Fifth Court of Appea ls aff irmed his convictions. Guzman v. Stat e, No. 05-09-01043- CR (Tex. App.– Dallas Mar. 15, 2011)(not designated f

or publication). Applicant contends that his sentenc es are improper beca use he was sentenc ed twice for one criminal ac t. He allege s that the s exual assault of a child by digital penetration was predic ated on2

a touching which was a part of the i ndece ncy with a child by contac t. Applicant has alleg ed facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief
. Patterson v. State , 152 S.W .3d 88 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004). In these circ umstances, additional fac ts are neede d. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez , 334 S.W .2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropr iate for um for finding s of fa ct. The trial court may

use any means set out in T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(d)
. I f the trial c ourt elec ts to hold a hearing, it sha ll de termine whe ther Applica nt is indi g ent. I f Applicant is indige nt and wishes to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall ap p o i nt an attorney to repre sent Applicant at the hearing. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. The trial court shall deter

mine whether the actions alleg ed in the two counts wer e separ ate and distinct instances or w ere a par t of one assault. The trial court shall make f indings of f

act a nd conclusions of law in reg ard to Applicant’s claim that his convictions violate double jeopar dy
. The trial court shall also make any other findings of f act a nd conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appr opriate to the disposition of Applicant’s c laim for habe as cor pus relief
. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fac t issues. The issues shall be re s o l v ed wi t h in 90 day s of this order
. A supplemental transcript containing all aff idavits and int err og atories or the t ransc ription of t he court repor ter’s notes from any hearing or deposition, alongwith the trial court’ s supplemental finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law, shall be forwar ded to this Court within 120 day s of the date of this order. Any extensions of t ime shall be obtained f

rom this Court.

Filed: F ebrua

ry 4, 2015 Do not publish
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3

Pursuant to Rule 438 promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
the undersigned hereby consents to be named as a person about to become a
director in the registration statement on Form S-1 to be filed on May 7, 1999 in
connection with the registration of shares of common stock of VaxGen, Inc., a
Delaware corporation. 



     /s/ ROBERTA R. KATZ                          Dated:  May 6, 1999
        ---------------
         (Signature)



        Roberta R. Katz
       ----------------
         (Print name)
25.7902-4 Procedures.

(S-90) If items require access to controlled technical information, the product specialist will update

the Purchase Order Text (POT) to include Standard Text Objects (STOs) RD002, Covered Defense

Information Applies, and RQ032, Export Control of Technical Data.

(S-91) For manual acquisitions, the contracting officer shall—

(1) Confirm that the POT contains STOs RQ032 and RD002 to notify offerors the item requires DLA

controlling authority approval to access export-controlled technical information contained within

DLA Systems; and

(2) Unless one of the exceptions at PGI 25.7902-4(S-90) applies, verify that the offeror and any

source(s) of supply it will use for contract performance have DLA controlling authority approval to

access export-controlled technical data within the cFolders. To identify contractors with DLA

controlling authority approval to access export-controlled technical data—

(i) See the Business Decision Analytics (BDA) Supplier Risk Analysis by CAGE Code Model in the

BDA Job Aid Folder (

https://dlamil.dps.mil/sites/InfoOps/Shared%20Documents/Forms/AllItems.aspx?FolderCTID=0x0120

00D3D259D71343A94E992AA17310CB0231&viewid=bb1b25a6%2D56d8%2D4398%2Dac48%2D5f9

87c946cca&id=%2Fsites%2FInfoOps%2FShared%20Documents%2FEBS%20ONLINE%20HELP%2F

ePROCUREMENT%2FBDA ); or

(ii) If the BDA Job Aid Folder is unavailable, contact the DLA controlling authority at email

DLAJ344DataCustodian@dla.mil .

(S-92)(1) For manual acquisitions, the contracting officer does not need to verify that an offeror and

any source(s) of supply it will use for contract performance have DLA controlling authority approval

to access export-controlled technical data if an exception at PGI 25.7902-4(S-90) applies.

(S-93) For automated acquisitions, the Auto Evaluation logic module will follow the enhanced

validation procedures and requirements identified in the DLA Master Solicitation for Automated

Simplified Acquisitions. To be eligible for award in the automated system, the offeror and any

source(s) of supply it will use for contract performance must have an active JCP certification and

DLA controlling authority approval to access export-controlled data.

Parent topic: SUBPART 25.79 – EXPORT CONTROL
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 930 

Encouraging reunions of divided Korean-American families. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 8, 2018 

Ms. BASS (for herself, Mr. CONNOLLY, Mr. MARINO, Mr. COOPER, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. WOODALL, Mr. MACARTHUR, Mr. GOMEZ, Ms. JUDY CHU

of California, Mr. SABLAN, Mr. TAKANO, and Ms. JACKSON LEE) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Encouraging reunions of divided Korean-American families. 

Whereas the Republic of Korea (in this resolution referred to 

as ‘‘South Korea’’) and the Democratic People’s Republic 

of Korea (in this resolution referred to as ‘‘North 

Korea’’) remain divided since the armistice agreement 

was signed on July 27, 1953; 

Whereas the division on the Korean Peninsula separated 

more than 10,000,000 Korean family members, including 

some who are now citizens of the United States; 

Whereas there have been 21 rounds of family reunions between South Koreans and North Koreans along the border since 2000; 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 930 IH 

Whereas Congress signaled its interest in family reunions between United States citizens and their relatives in North 

Korea in section 1265 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181), 

signed into law by President George W. Bush on January 

28, 2008; 

Whereas the number of more than 100,000 estimated divided 

family members in the United States last identified in 

2001 has been significantly dwindling as many of them 

have passed away; 

Whereas the summit between North Korea and South Korea 

on April 27, 2018, has prioritized family reunions; 

Whereas the United States and North Korea has planned an 

historic summit in 2018; and 

Whereas many Korean-Americans are waiting for a chance to 

meet their relatives in North Korea for the first time in 

more than 60 years: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That House of Representatives— 

2 (1) calls on the United States and North Korea 

3 to reunite Korean-American divided family members 

4 with their immediate relatives within 60 days of the 

5 adoption of this resolution; 

6 (2) reconfirms the institution of family as in7 alienable and, accordingly, urges the restoration of 

8 contact between divided families physically, literarily, 

9 or virtually; and 

10 (3) calls on the United States and North Korea 

11 to pursue reunions as a humanitarian priority of imVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:51 Jun 08, 2018 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR930.IH HR930

lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 930 IH 

1 mediate concern, delinked as much as possible from 

2 conflict, before attempts at or achievement of nor3 malized relations are made. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
Editorial Note on Part 184
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 184 appear at 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; and 81 FR 49897, July 29, 2016.

§ 184.1034 Catalase (bovine liver). ( a ) Catalase (bovine liver) (CAS Reg. No. 81457-95-6) is an enzyme preparation obtained from extracts of bovine liver. It is a partially purified liquid or powder. Its characterizing enzyme activity is catalase (EC 1.11.1.6).
( b ) The ingredient meets the general requirements and additional requirements for enzyme preparations in the Food Chemicals Codex, 3d ed. (1981), p. 110, which is incorporated by reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies are available from the National Academy Press, 2101 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20418, or may be examined at the Office of Food Additive Safety (HFS-200), Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Food and Drug Administration, 5001 Campus Dr., College Park, MD 20740, 240-402-1200, and at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .*
( c ) In accordance with § 184.1(b)(1), the ingredient is used in food with no limitation other than current good manufacturing practice. The affirmation of this ingredient as GRAS as a direct food ingredient is based upon the following current good manufacturing practice conditions of use: ( 1 ) The ingredient is used as an enzyme as defined in § 170.3(o)(9) of this chapter to decompose hydrogen peroxide.
( 2 ) The ingredient is used in food at levels not to exceed current good manufacturing practice.
[60 FR 32910, June 26, 1995, as amended at 69 FR 24512, May 4, 2004; 78 FR 14666, Mar. 7, 2013]
##### 












(1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.


/s/ WILLIAM C. GRIFFITHSWilliam C. GriffithsChairman of the Board of Directors,President and Chief Executive OfficerChampion Enterprises, Inc.October 26, 2007/s/ PHYLLIS A. KNIGHTPhyllis A. KnightExecutive Vice President, Treasurer andChief Financial OfficerChampion Enterprises, Inc.October 26, 2007
Exhibit 13





Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of


1934 and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Ellomay Capital Ltd. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2014, as amended by Amendment No. 1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned officers of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





A)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





B)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Ran Fridrich

Ran Fridrich

Chief Executive Officer



/s/ Kalia Weintraub

Kalia Weintraub

Chief Financial Officer




Date: June 8, 2015
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FE BRUARY 19, 2014

NO. 03

- 11

- 00085

- CR

Mark A. Clark, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GO OD WIN, AND FIELD
AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the tr i a l court on February 7, 2011

.
Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no

reversible error in the trial court’s judgment of conviction . Therefore, the Court affirms the trial

court’s judgm ent of conviction

. The appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in

this Court and the court below.
§ 182.1073 Phosphoric acid. ( a ) *Product.* Phosphoric acid.
( b ) *Conditions of use.* This substance is generally recognized as safe when used in accordance with good manufacturing practice.