CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD

APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 1

(Electronic Format)

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

District: Great Basin Unified Air Pollution Control District

Rule No(s): 216* (Adopted 10/15/79), 405, 307 & 502 Date adopted/Amended/Rescinded: July 7, 2005

Note: The District has two rules that are numbered 216. One was adopted on 3/10/76 and the other on 10/15/79. The 

revision on July 7, 2005 was made to Rule 216 that was adopted on 10/15/79.

Rule Title(s): 216 - New Source Review Requirements for Determining Impact on Air Quality Secondary Sources; 

405 - Exceptions; 307 - Conservation Management Practices & Plan Fees; 502 - Conservation Management 

Practices

Date Submitted to ARB: July 26, 2005

If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended (or Adopted): Rule 216 - Adopted 10/15/79; Rule 405 - Revised 11/07/01

Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? Yes No (If No, do not complete remainder of form)

District Contact: Duane Ono Phone Number: 760-872-8211 E-mail Address: duaneono@yahoo.com

Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: New Rule Amended Rule

Rule changes are intended to comply with Senate Bill 700 requiring the District to adopt rules requiring BACM 

and BARCT for applicable agricultural practices and it removes agricultural exemptions for permit requriements.

Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Check): ROG (NOx) SO2

 (CO) PM TAC (name):

II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS

Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when implemented, will result in quantifiable changes in emissions. Attach reference(s) for emission factor(s) and 

other information. Attach calculation sheet showing how the emission information provided below was determined.

Net Effect on Emissions: Increase Decrease N/A

Emission Reduction Commitment in SIP for this Source Category: 

Inventory Year Used to Calculate Changes in Emissions: Area Affected: 

Future Year Control Profile Estimate (Provide information on as many years as possible):
CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD

APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 2

(Electronic Format)

Baseline Inventory in the SIP for the Control Measure: Mono Basin - 0 T/Y; Coso Junction - 0 T/Y; Owens Valley - 1 

T/Y; Mammoth Lakes - 0 T/Y.

Emissions Reduction Commitment in the SIP for the Control Measure: 0 for all areas

Revised Baseline Inventory (if any): 

Revised Emission Reduction Estimate (if developed): 

Note that the district’s input to the Rule Evaluation Form will not be used as input to the ARB’s emission forecasting and 

planning.

III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS

District is: Attainment Nonattainment Split

Approximate Total Number of Small (<100 TPY) Sources Affected by this Amendment: 15

Percent in Nonattainment Area: 15%

Number of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled: 0 Percent in Nonattainment Area: 0%

Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule (Attach additional sheets as 

necessary): 

IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY

Does the Rule Include Emission Limits that are Continuous? Yes No

If Yes, Those Limits are in Section(s) of the Rule.

Other Methods in the Rule for Achieving Emission Reductions are: Agricultural BACM

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS

The Rule Contains:

Emission Limits in Section(s): Work Practice Standards in Section(s): Rule 502, Section 6.2

Recordkeeping Requirements in Section(s): Rule 502, Section 6.5 Reporting Requirements in Section(s): 
CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD

APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 3

(Electronic Format)

5/1/2002

3

VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN

 No Impact Impacts RFP Impacts attainment

Discussion: