alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 20.66 Internal personnel rules and practices.

Records or information may be withheld from public disclosure if they are related solely to the internal personnel rules and practices of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Under this exemption, FDA may withhold records or information about routine internal agency practices and procedures. Under this exemption, the agency may also withhold internal records whose release would help some persons circumvent the law.

[70 FR 41958, July 21, 2005]
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.01


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" in the
Registration Statement on Form S-4 and related Proxy Statement/Prospectus of
Corixa Corporation for the registration of 4,716,860 shares of its common stock
and to the incorporation by reference therein of our report dated February 3,
1999, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Corixa
Corporation included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 1998, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Seattle, Washington                                         ERNST & YOUNG LLP
August 11, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                      $1,301,817
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            $1,519,167
<PP&E>                                     $22,473,564
<DEPRECIATION>                              $7,267,683
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             $16,725,048
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         $462,895
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                 ($1,344,891)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               $16,725,048
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            $2,788,388
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               $1,721,737
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               $11,120
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          $1,017,483
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 $6,882
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             $6,882
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    $6,882
<EPS-BASIC>                                     $.70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     $.70


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 11
                                                                      ----------


                    COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (LOSS)

                           National Datacomputer, Inc.
          Statement recomputation of net income (loss) per common share

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                            Nine Months Ended
                                                                     -------------------------------
                                                                     September 30,     September 30,
                                                                         1999              1998
                                                                     -------------     -------------
<S>                                                                  <C>               <C>
Net loss, as reported                                                $    (47,044)     $   (234,619)

Preferred stock preference items:

Warrant                                                                                $   (214,000)

Discount inherent in conversion terms of Series C
        convertible preferred stock upon issuance                                      $    (25,958)

Discount inherent in conversion terms of Series D
        convertible preferred stock upon issuance                                      $    (20,644)

Discount inherent in conversion terms of Series F
        convertible preferred stock upon issuance                    $    (56,250)              -

Interest on Series B, C, D and F convertible preferred stock         $   (315,250)     $   (308,250)
                                                                     -------------     -------------

Total preferred stock preference item                                $   (371,500)     $   (568,852)

Net loss attributable to common stockholders                         $   (418,544)     $   (803,471)

Weighted average shares outstanding:

A. Shares attributable to common stock outstanding                      2,600,596         1,801,876
B. Shares attributable to convertible preferred stock outstanding             -                 -
C. Shares attributable to common stock options and warrants
        pursuant to APB 15, paragraph 38 (a)                                  -                 -
                                                                     -------------     -------------
Weighted average shares outstanding                                     2,600,596         1,801,876
                                                                     =============     =============

Net loss per share                                                   $      (0.16)     $      (0.45)
                                                                     =============     =============
</TABLE>
§ 182.3089 Sorbic acid. ( a ) *Product.* Sorbic acid.
( b ) *Conditions of use.* This substance is generally recognized as safe when used in accordance with good manufacturing practice.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7304 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7304

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to establish that benefits 
 paid to a parent caring for the child of an individual who died while 
   performing active duty as a member of the Armed Services are not 
       subject to deductions under the retirement earnings test.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2024

Mr. Waltz (for himself, Ms. Houlahan, Mr. Bishop of Georgia, Mr. Bacon, 
   Mr. Davis of North Carolina, and Mr. Nunn of Iowa) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title II of the Social Security Act to establish that benefits 
 paid to a parent caring for the child of an individual who died while 
   performing active duty as a member of the Armed Services are not 
       subject to deductions under the retirement earnings test.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting the Families of Our 
Fallen Patriots Act''.

SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FROM RETIREMENT EARNINGS TEST.

    (a) In General.--Section 203(b) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 403(b)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(3) In any case in which an surviving spouse or surviving 
divorced parent is entitled to a mother's or father's insurance benefit 
under section 202(g) and such benefit is based on the wages and self-
employment income of a deceased individual who died while performing 
active duty as a member of the Armed Forces, the benefit to which such 
surviving spouse or surviving divorced parent is entitled on the basis 
of the wages and self-employment income of such deceased individual 
shall not be subject to deductions under this subsection.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply with respect to benefits payable for months that begin on or 
after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Freddie Baker, Defendant-Appellant.

Gen. No. 67-123.

Fifth District.

July 24,1969.

*326Sylvester L. Carter, of Madison (Clayton R. Williams, of Edwardsville, of counsel), for appellant.

No brief filed for appellee.

PER CURIAM:

This proceeding is brought under the Juvenile Court Act (c 37, § 701-1 et seq., Ill Rev Stats 1967) and was instituted by the filing of a petition in the Circuit Court of Madison County, in which an Assistant State’s Attorney alleged that Freddie Baker, hereafter called defendant, was a minor under the age of 17 years, was in need of protection and assistance, and was presently in the custody of the Sheriff of Madison County, having allegedly committed the offenses of Assault and Auto Theft. It prayed that a Detention Hearing be held in accordance with section 3-6 (c 37, § 703-6) of the Act.

The Detention Hearing was held, and pending an Adjudicatory Hearing, defendant was released to the custody of his parents.

On August 29, 1967, another petition was filed, assigned a number different than that of the first petition, stating that defendant was charged with the offenses of Theft and Assault which allegedly were committed 15 days subsequent to the date of the Detention Hearing. The petition prayed that defendant, his parents, and the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors of Madison County be made defendants, the issuance of summons returnable on the date of an Adjudicatory Hearing, that defendant be adjudged a ward of the Court, and at a Dispositional Hearing such order be entered for the care, custody and control of defendant as is in his best interest.

The record reflects that another Detention Hearing was held on August 21, 1967, and defendant was ordered *327detained by the Sheriff until the Adjudicatory Hearing. An Adjudicatory Hearing was held and a finding made that defendant was a delinquent. The court entered a Dispositional Order committing defendant to the Elinois Youth Commission. This appeal followed.

In In re Urbasek, 38 Ill2d 535, 232 NE2d 716, the Supreme Court held that to support a finding of delinquency based upon the commission of an offense, which, if committed by an adult would be a crime, the offense must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt.

We have carefully examined the testimony, and the record does not support a finding that defendant was guilty of either Theft or Assault. Insofar as the evidence purports to show a theft, his conduct if persisted in, might give rise to an action in replevin, but no criminal offense was proved. With respect to the Assault, proof of the necessary elements of the offense is lacking. The judgment of the Circuit Court of Madison County is reversed.

Judgment reversed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       2,443,508
<SECURITIES>                                   103,167
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,459,688
<ALLOWANCES>                                   857,775
<INVENTORY>                                  7,993,706
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,404,754
<PP&E>                                       7,003,419
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,982,963
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,411,221
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,972,231
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        94,312
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,916,033
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,411,221
<SALES>                                     29,261,267
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            33,229,229
<CGS>                                       25,241,986
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               25,241,986
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                40,172
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             324,017
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,482,887)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,482,887)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,482,887)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.31)
        

</TABLE>
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 129476 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 129476 

 COA: 253296 

Berrien CC: 2003-403328-FC 

COLEMAN TAVON EDWARDS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 9, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d1121 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2005 

Clerk
###### Editorial Note on Part 181

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 181 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996, and 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001.

#### § 181.25 Driers.

Substances classified as driers, when migrating from food-packaging material shall include:

Cobalt caprylate.

Cobalt linoleate.

Cobalt naphthenate.

Cobalt tallate.

Iron caprylate.

Iron linoleate.

Iron naphthenate.

Iron tallate.

Manganese caprylate.

Manganese linoleate.

Manganese naphthenate.

Manganese tallate.

[42 FR 14638, Mar. 15, 1977; 42 FR 56728, Oct. 28, 1977]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services

Pursuant to Public Law 92-462, notice is hereby given of a cancellation of the February 10, 2010 meeting of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) Center for Substance Abuse Prevention (CSAP) National Advisory Council.

                    Public notice was given in the                     **Federal Register**                     on January 28, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 18, and Page 4755) that the CSAP National Advisory Council would be meeting on February 10, 2010, at the Gaylord Convention Center in National Harbor, Maryland. The meeting was canceled due to hazardous weather conditions and closure of the Federal government. An alternate date, time and location for the meeting will be announced in the                     **Federal Register**                     as soon as arrangements have been made.                

                    Members of the public wishing further information concerning this cancellation notice or any future meetings of the Center for Substance Abuse Prevention National Advisory Council should contact the Designated Federal Official, Tia Haynes, 1 Choke Cherry Road, Room 4-1066, Rockville, MD 20857, Telephone: 240-276-2436, FAX: 240-276-2430, and E-mail:                     *tia.haynes@samhsa.hhs.gov.*

Toian Vaughn,

Committee Management Officer, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.

[FR Doc. 2010-3903 Filed 2-25-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         892,176
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,353,483
<ALLOWANCES>                               (2,813,363)
<INVENTORY>                                 13,057,024
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            24,281,444
<PP&E>                                       3,948,891
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,507,758)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              48,626,805
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,899,417
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    25,711,782
<OTHER-SE>                                (19,134,949)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                48,626,805
<SALES>                                     40,997,127
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            41,523,589
<CGS>                                       16,988,037
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               16,988,037
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            36,943,348
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,974,005
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (14,381,801)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (14,381,801)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (14,381,801)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.94)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.94)
        


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 17
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 17 appear at 68 FR 24879, May 9, 2003, and at 88 FR 45065, July 14, 2023.

§ 17.32 Motions. ( a ) Any application to the presiding officer for an order or ruling shall be by motion. Motions shall state the relief sought, the authority relied upon, and the facts alleged, and shall be filed with the Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852, delivered to the presiding officer, and served on all other parties.
( b ) Except for motions made during a prehearing conference or at the hearing, all motions shall be in writing. The presiding officer may require that oral motions be reduced to writing.
( c ) Within 15 days after a written motion is served, or such other time as may be fixed by the presiding officer, any party may file a response to such motion.
( d ) The presiding officer may not grant a written motion before the time for filing responses thereto has expired, except upon consent of the parties or following a hearing on the motion, but may overrule or deny such motion without awaiting a response.
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Novex Systems International,
Inc. ("the Company") on Form 10-QSB for the twelve month period ended May 31,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Daniel W. Dowe, the President and Acting Treasurer of the
Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, certify that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and
            Section 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
            of the Company.


                                       By: /s/ Daniel W. Dowe
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Daniel W. Dowe
                                           Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                                           Financial Officer

                                       Date: October 14, 2003


                                       28
Exhibit 32 (b)
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
(15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78(d)); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Partnership.
 Date: 11-15-10/s/ GARY S. JONESGary S. JonesPresident A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Northland Cable Properties Seven Limited Partnership and will be retained by Northland Cable
Properties Seven Limited Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.