alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         605,540
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  169,325
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      31,568,358
<DEPRECIATION>                              16,796,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              31,967,201
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,899,312
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                (10,194,832)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                31,967,201
<SALES>                                     13,067,750
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,067,750
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,002,698
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,751,581
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (741,802)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (741,802)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
# C_2019232EN.01000501.xml

| 10.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 232/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 232/5

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 8 July 2019

appointing one member and one alternate member of the Management Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) for Lithuania

(2019/C 232/04)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2019/128 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 January 2019 establishing the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 337/75 (1), and in particular Article 4 thereof,

Having regard to the list of candidates submitted to the Council by the Governments of the Member States and by the employees' and the employers' organisations,

Whereas:

| (1) | By its Decision of 9 April 2019 (2), the Council appointed the members and alternate members of the Management Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the period from 1 April 2019 to 31 March 2023. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By its Decision of 9 April 2019 (2), the Council appointed the members and alternate members of the Management Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the period from 1 April 2019 to 31 March 2023.

| (2) | The employers' organisation BusinessEurope has submitted two nominations for two posts to be filled, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The employers' organisation BusinessEurope has submitted two nominations for two posts to be filled,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following are appointed member and alternate member of the Management Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) for the period ending on 31 March 2023:

REPRESENTATIVES OF EMPLOYERS' ORGANISATIONS

| Country | Member | Alternate member |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Lithuania | Mr Marius ABLAČINSKAS | Mr Danukas ARLAUSKAS |

Country

Member

Alternate member

Lithuania

Mr Marius ABLAČINSKAS

Mr Danukas ARLAUSKAS

Article 2

The Council shall appoint the members and alternate members not yet nominated at a later date.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 8 July 2019.

For the Council

The President

A.-K. PEKONEN

---

(1)  OJ L 30, 31.1.2019, p. 90.

1

(2)  OJ C 136, 12.4.2019, p. 6.

2

---
§ 26.71 Exchange of information. ( a ) The parties shall exchange information concerning the implementation of the legislative, regulatory, and administrative provisions identified in subparts A and B of this part.
( b ) Each party shall notify the other party of legislative, regulatory, and administrative changes related to the subject matter of this part at least 60 days before their entry into force. Where considerations of safety, health or environmental protection require more urgent action, a party shall notify the other party as soon as practicable.
( c ) Each party shall promptly notify the other party of any changes to its designating authorities and/or conformity assessment bodies (CAB's).
( d ) The parties shall exchange information concerning the procedures used to ensure that the listed CAB's under their responsibility comply with the legislative, regulatory, and administrative provisions outlined in subpart B of this part.
( e ) Regulatory authorities identified in subparts A and B of this part shall consult as necessary with their counterparts, to ensure the maintenance of confidence in conformity assessment procedures and to ensure that all technical requirements are identified and are satisfactorily addressed.
Exhibit 10.3


 





AMENDMENT
No. 1 TO AMENDED & RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This Amendment No. 1 (the “Amendment”)
to the Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of October 1, 2014 (the “Employment Agreement”), by
and between Xcel Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and Seth Burroughs (the “Executive”,
and together with the Company, the “parties”), is dated April 26, 2017 and effective as of April 1, 2017.


 


WHEREAS, the parties have previously entered
into the Employment Agreement providing for the terms and conditions of the employment of Executive by the Company;


 


WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend the Employment
Agreement to amend certain provisions of the Employment Agreement as set forth herein.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the
covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which
are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


1.       Compensation. Effective April 1, 2017 Section 1.3(a) of the Employment Agreement is deleted in its entirety and replaced
with the following:


 


(a)           Base
Salary.  The Executive’s base salary during the Employment Period shall be $340,600 per annum (the “Base
Salary”).  The Base Salary will be payable to the Executive by the Company in regular installments in accordance
with the Company’s general payroll practices.  The Executive shall receive such increases (but not decreases) in
his Base Salary as the Board of Directors, or the compensation committee of the Board of Directors, may approve in its sole discretion
from time to time. The Base Salary shall be reviewed at least annually.


 


2.       Scope
of Amendment. Except as specifically amended hereby, the Employment Agreement shall continue in full force and effect, unamended,
from and after the date hereof.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed
and delivered this Amendment, intending to be legally bound hereby, as of the date first above written.


 


	 	XCEL BRANDS, INC.
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Robert W D'Loren
	 	 	Name:Robert W D'Loren
	 	 	Title:Chairman, CEO
	 	 	 
	 	 
	 	EXECUTIVE:
	 	 
	 	/s/ Seth Burroughs
	 	Seth Burroughs
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                           6,416
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   71,889
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (5,239)
<INVENTORY>                                     53,135
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               133,837
<PP&E>                                          32,151
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 175,577
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          107,500
<BONDS>                                        155,450
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           175
<OTHER-SE>                                    (89,329)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   175,577
<SALES>                                        102,775
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               102,775
<CGS>                                           71,951
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   71,951
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,903
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,515
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,406
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,049
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,357
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,784)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,573
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                          36,558
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   66,246
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (4,502)
<INVENTORY>                                     50,218
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               161,685
<PP&E>                                          55,506
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (21,993)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 204,889
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          102,754
<BONDS>                                        155,440
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           183
<OTHER-SE>                                     (55,809)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   204,889
<SALES>                                        113,146
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               113,146
<CGS>                                           78,466
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   78,466
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,246
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,880
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,554
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,481
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,073
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,073
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 184
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 184 appear at 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; and 81 FR 49897, July 29, 2016.

§ 184.1733 Sodium benzoate. ( a ) Sodium benzoate is the chemical benzoate of soda (C7H5NaO2), produced by the neutralization of benzoic acid with sodium bicarbonate, sodium carbonate, or sodium hydroxide. The salt is not found to occur naturally.
( b ) The ingredient meets the specifications of the “Food Chemicals Codex,” 3d Ed. (1981), p. 278, which is incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the National Academy Press, 2101 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20418, or may be examined at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .*
( c ) The ingredient is used as an antimicrobial agent as defined in § 170.3(o)(2) of this chapter, and as a flavoring agent and adjuvant as defined in § 170.3(o)(12) of this chapter.
( d ) The ingredient is used in food at levels not to exceed good manufacturing practice. Current usage results in a maximum level of 0.1 percent in food. (The Food and Drug Administration has not determined whether significally different conditions of use would be GRAS.)
( e ) Prior sanctions for this ingredient different from the uses established in this section, or different from that set forth in part 181 of this chapter, do not exist or have been waived.
[42 FR 14653, Mar. 15, 1977, as amended at 49 FR 5613, Feb. 14, 1984]
June 25, 2015

Ms. Lori Martin-Martell

1054 NE 35 Avenue Homestead, FL 33033

Dear Ms. Martin-Martell:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) . It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your June 12, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-2248), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
[No. 39423-1-I.

Division One.

January 26, 1998.]

#### Hasan Ocak, *Respondent,*v. Vladimir Arieff, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 95-2-01994-3, Robert H. Alsdorf, J., entered September 16, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
## United States Court of Appeals
**For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________

No. 24

- 1302

___________________________

United States of America

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Brady Austin Rogers

Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Eastern

____________

Submitted: July 1 9 , 2024 Filed: July 24, 2024 [Unpublished]

____________ Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Brady Austin Rogers appeals the 92

- month sentence the district court 1 imposed after sua sponte granting a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and Guidelines Amendment 821. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.

1 The Honorable Stephen H. Locher, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.-2- Rogers’s counsel , who has moved for leave to withdraw

, filed a brief arguing that the district court erred by not varying downward from the amended Guidelines range as it did at Rogers’s initial sentencing. In a pro se supplemental brief, Rogers challenges the fairness of Amendment 821 as applied to defendan ts, such as himself, who had no prior opportunity to provide substantial assistance to the government.

Upon careful review, this court find s no error in the sentence reduction the district court granted

. See United States v. Tollefson , 853 F.3d 481, 485 (8th Cir. 2017) (standard of review).

[ I] n the case of a defendant who has been sentenced to a term of imprisonment based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing Commission . . . the court may reduce the term of imprisonment, after considering the factors set forth in section 3553(a) to the extent they are applicable, if such a reduction is consistent with applicable policy statements issued by the Sentencing
Commission.

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (emphasis added). Accord United States v. Helm , 891 F.3d 740, 742 (8th Cir. 2018) (noting § 3582(c)(2) requires that any reduction “be consistent with applicable policy statements issued by the Sentencing Commission”). Roger s ’s reduced sentence fell at the bottom of the amended Guidelines range . By the language in § 3582(c)(2), Congress limited the district court’s discretion to grant a variance reducing Rogers’s sentence below what U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10 allows. See U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10( b)(2)(A), (b)(2)(B), (d) (providing that any reduction may not be below amended Guidelines range unless
initial below

- Guidelines sentence reflected defendant’s substantial assistance).

The judgment is affirmed, and counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

______________________________
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20

- 2230

In re: WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR. , Petitioner

.

No. 20

- 2242

In re: WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR. , Petitioner

.

On Petitions for Writ of Mandamus . ( 5:16

- hc

- 02211

- BA )

Submitted : April 27, 2021 Decided: April 30, 2021

Before KEENAN , WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Petitions denied by un published per curiam opinion

.
William Scott Davis, Jr. , Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: William Scott Davis, Jr., petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order declaring the district court’s orders void. W e conclude that Davis is not entitled to
mandamus relief. Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary
circumstances. Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Ct. , 542 U.S. 367, 380 (2004) ; In re Murphy

- Brown,
LLC , 907 F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018) . Further, mandamus relief is available only when
th e petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. Murphy

- Brown , 907 F.3d at 795. Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. In re Lockheed Martin Corp. , 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007). The relief sought by Davis is not available by wa y of mandamus. Accordingly, we deny the petition s for a writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION S DENIED
Editorial Note on Part 173
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 173 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; and 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 173.220 1,3-Butylene glycol. 1,3-Butylene glycol (1,3-butanediol) may be safely used in food in accordance with the following prescribed conditions: ( a ) The substance meets the following specifications: ( 1 ) 1,3-Butylene glycol content: Not less than 99 percent.
( 2 ) Specific gravity at 20/20 °C: 1.004 to 1.006.
( 3 ) Distillation range: 200°-215 °C.
( b ) It is used in the minimum amount required to perform its intended effect.
( c ) It is used as a solvent for natural and synthetic flavoring substances except where standards of identity issued under section 401 of the act preclude such use.
### Page 1 of2 

## Burlington WA Corporate Office 1620 S Walnut St - 98233 800.755.9295$360.757.1400

## Bellingham WA Microbiology 805 Orchard Dr Ste 4 - 98225 360.671.0688 

## Portland OR Microbiology/Chemistry 9150 SW Pioneer Ct Ste W- 97070 503.682.7802



## 11-08102 

# QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Report Date: 

# Duplicate, Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate and Confirmation Result Report 6/22/2011 Reference Number: 

# SAMPLE DEPENDENT



# Duplicate Duplicate QC Comments

Qualifier Limits %RPD Units Result Result Analyte Sample Batch Type 

### 6020_110613 17643 BERYLLIUM mg/Kg DUP 0.09 0.11 20.0 0-20 17643ARSENIC mg/Kg DUP 25 26 3.9 0-50 17643CADMIUM mg/Kg DUP 2.2 2.1 4.7 0-50 17643 MANGANESE mg/Kg DUP 0.7 0.7 0.0 0-50 17643 NICKEL mg/Kg DUP 150 153 2.0 0-50 17643 LEAD mg/Kg DUP 13 13 0.0 0-50 17643ANTIMONY mg/Kg DUP 0.9 0.9 0.0 0-50 17643COBALT mg/Kg DUP 1.2 1.2 0.0 0-20



### Matrix Spike (MS)/Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) analyses are used to determine the accuracy (MS) and precision (MSD) of a analytical method in a given sample matrix. Therefore, the usefulness of this report is limited to samples of similar matrices analyzed in the same analytical batch. NA = Indicates %RPD could not be calculated %RPD = Relative Percent Difference

Only Duplicate sample with detections are listed in this report

### Page 2 of2 

### Reference Number:

## 11-08102 Report Date:

## 6/22/2011 

# Matrix Spike Duplicate QC Spike Spike Spike Percent Recovery Comments Qualifier Limits %RPD Batch Sample Analyte Result Result Result Conc Units MS MSD Limits Type 

### 6020_110613 96 17643 BERYLLIUM mg/Kg 100 70-130 LFM 0.09 96 NA 0-50 99 17643ARSENIC mg/Kg 100 70-130 LFM 25 124 NA 0-50 97 17643CADMIUM mg/Kg 100 70-130 LFM 2.2 98.9 NA 0-50 95 17643CHROMIUM mg/Kg 100 70-130 LFM ND 94.7 NA 0-50 111 17643 MANGANESE mg/Kg 100 70-130 LFM 0.7 112 NA 0-50 119 17643 NICKEL mg/Kg 100 70-130 LFM 150 269 NA 0-50 71 17643 LEAD mg/Kg 100 70-130 LFM 13 84.2 NA 0-50 101 17643SELENIUM mg/Kg 100 70-130 LFM ND 101 NA 0-50 99 17643ANTIMONY mg/Kg 100 70-130 LFM 0.9 100 NA 0-50 117 17643COBALT mg/Kg 100 70-130 LFM 1.2 118 NA 0-50



### Matrix Spike (MS)/Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) analyses are used to determine the accuracy (MS) and precision (MSD) of a analytical method in a given sample matrix. Therefore, the usefulness of this report is limited to samples of similar matrices analyzed in the same analytical batch. NA = Indicates %RPD could not be calculated %RPD = Relative Percent Difference

Only Duplicate sample with detections are listed in this report