alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

      ( print page 8719)    
The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than March 12, 2010.

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago**                     (Colette A. Fried, Assistant Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:                

*1. Carol O'Leary*, Medford, Wisconsin, as an individual; and Carol O'Leary, Medford, Wisconsin; Tristar Printing Co., Inc., Abbotsford, Wisconsin; Kevin S. Flink and Kristine M. O'Leary, both of Abbotsford, Wisconsin; and Willis R. Whetstone, Medford, Wisconsin, as a group acting in concert to retain control of Central Wisconsin Bancorporation, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire Community Bank of Central Wisconsin, both of Colby, Wisconsin.                

**B. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco**                     (Kenneth Binning, Vice President, Applications and Enforcement) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, California 94105-1579:                

*1. Park Randal Roney, Mapleton, Utah, Blake Marshal Roney, Provo, Utah, Robert Tod Monsen, Mapleton, Utah, and Steven Jay Lund, of Provo, Utah*; to acquire voting shares of Community Bancorporation, Pleasant Grove, Utah, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Western Community Bank, Orem, Utah.                 

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 22, 2010.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2010-3810 Filed 2-24-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 24.2

                     POWER OF ATTORNEY OF MICHAEL R. HALLMAN

        KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned, Michael R.
Hallman, hereby constitutes and appoints Michael D. Yonker or John V. Harker,
his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, for him and his name, place and
stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the Registration Statement on Form S-8
of in Focus Systems, Inc., an Oregon corporation, and any amendments or
supplements thereto, and to file this Power of Attorney and the Form S-8, with
all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith with the
Securities and Exchange Commission and the Nasdaq National Market System,
granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and
perform each and every thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the
premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in
person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent
may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

        Dated this 13th day of May, 1998.

Signature:


/s/ Michael R. Hallman
--------------------------
Michael R. Hallman



                                     II-30
38135.

#### NEW AMSTERDAM CASUALTY COMPANY *et al.*v. FREELAND, Guardian.

Nichols, Judge.

The judgment of this court *(New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Freeland,*101 Ga. App. 754, 115 S. E. 2d 443), affirming the judgment of the superior court having been *790reversed by the Supreme Court of Georgia on certiorari (216 Ga. 492), the said judgment of this court is vacated and the judgment of the superior court is reversed in accordance with the judgment of the Supreme Court.

Decided December 2, 1960.

*Smith, Oliver, Johnson & Bostick, R. Wilson Smith, Jr.,*for plaintiffs in error.

*William P. Whelchel,*contra.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Felton, C. J., Townsend, P. J., Carlisle, Bell, Frankum and Jordan, JJ., concur.*
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7144
RAYMOND PETERSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ALTON R. ANDERSON; JOHN WILLIAMS; D. C. KINGSBURY, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-95-320-5-CT-BR) Submitted: November 7, 1996 Decided: November 20, 1996 Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Raymond Peterson, Appellant Pro Se. William McBlief, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Peterson v. Anderson , No. CA-95-320-5-CT-BR (E.D.N.C. July 5, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 37 (Thursday, February 25, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 8789]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3752]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Veterans' Rural Health Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public 
Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the Veterans' Rural 
Health Advisory Committee will hold a meeting on March 2-3, 2010, in 
the Robert Taylor Room at the Carnegie Hotel, 1216 West State of 
Franklin Road, Johnson City, Tennessee. The sessions will begin at 8 
a.m. each day and end at 4 p.m. on March 2 and at 2:30 p.m. on March 3.
    The purpose of the Committee is to advise the Secretary of Veterans 
Affairs on health care issues affecting enrolled Veterans residing in 
rural areas. The Committee examines programs and policies that impact 
the provision of VA health care to enrolled Veterans residing in rural 
areas, and discusses ways to improve and enhance VA services for these 
Veterans.
    On March 2, the Committee will meet in open session from 8 a.m. 
until 2 p.m. The Committee will hear from its chairman, the acting 
director of the VA Office of Rural Health, and the directors of the 
three Veterans Rural Health Resource Centers. The Committee will hold a 
panel discussion on the opportunities and challenges of VA 
collaboration with rural community partners, and discuss its 2010 work 
plan and priorities. The Committee will convene a closed session from 2 
p.m. to 4 p.m. in order to protect patient privacy as the Committee 
tours patient treatment areas at the Mountain Home VA Medical Center. 
Closing this portion of the meeting is in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 
552b(c)(6).
    On March 3, the Committee will receive a summary of the tour of the 
Mountain Home VA Medical Center, presentations on service delivery 
models for primary care and their application in the rural context from 
VA and Indian Health Service and discuss Committee priorities and 
action plans for fiscal year 2010.
    Time will be allocated for receiving public comments at 1:45 p.m. 
Individuals who speak are invited to submit 1-2 page summaries of their 
comments at the time of the meeting for inclusion in the official 
meeting record. For additional information, please contact Christina 
White, Designated Federal Officer, at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#11636463707d3f7974707d65793f787f60647863685167703f767e67"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e3919691828fcd8b86828f978bcd8a8d92968a919aa39582cd848c95">[email protected]</span></a> or 
(202) 461-7100.

    By Direction of the Secretary.
Vivian Drake,
Acting Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-3752 Filed 2-24-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 203.12 An appeal from an adverse decision by the district office.

An appeal from an adverse decision by the district office involving insulin-containing drugs or human prescription drugs or biological products regulated by the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research may be made to the Office of Compliance, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002. An appeal from an adverse decision by the district office involving human prescription biological products regulated by the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research may be made to the Food and Drug Administration, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Document Control Center, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. G112, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002.

[80 FR 18090, Apr. 3, 2015]
§ 20.103 Correspondence. ( a ) All correspondence to and from members of the public, members of Congress, organization or company officials, or other persons, except members of the Executive Branch of the Federal Government and special government employees, is available for public disclosure.
( b ) Any such correspondence is available for public disclosure at the time that it is sent or received by the Food and Drug Administration unless a different time for such disclosure is specified in other rules established or cross-referenced in this part, e.g., correspondence relating to an IND notice or an NDA in § 314.430 of this chapter.
[42 FR 15616, Mar. 22, 1977, as amended at 54 FR 9038, Mar. 3, 1989]
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.18.3


                             THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE

                                 PROMISSORY NOTE


This THIRD AMENDMENT ("Amendment") dated as of January 1, 2002, by WFS FINANCIAL
INC, a California corporation ("WFS"), and WESTERN FINANCIAL BANK, formerly
known as Western Financial Bank, F.S.B. ("WFB") amends the PROMISSORY NOTE
("Note") executed by WFS in favor of WFB on August 1, 1997. Capitalized terms
not defined herein shall have the same meaning as defined in the Note.

The Note is hereby amended to:

         1.       Increase the principal amount from $67,500,000 to
                  $150,000,000;

         2.       Decrease the rate of interest on the Note from 9.420% to
                  8.875%; and

         3.       Amend the scheduled payment of Principal such that Principal
                  shall now be all due and payable on or before August 1, 2007
                  (the "Maturity"), except that, notwithstanding anything to the
                  contrary, WFB shall have the exclusive option to require WFS
                  to pay all or part of the Principal at any time from the date
                  hereof to the Maturity.

Except as specifically amended herein, all terms and conditions of the Note
shall remain in full force and effect.

Wherefore, WFS and WFB have caused this Amendment to be executed and delivered
by its duly authorized signatory as of the date first set forth above.


WFS FINANCIAL INC

By:   __________________________________
      Thomas A. Wolfe

Its:  President


WESTERN FINANCIAL BANK

By:   __________________________________
      J. Keith Palmer

Its:  SVP & Treasurer
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7370 

AN ACT 

To amend the Geothermal Steam Act of 1970 to establish 

a deadline for processing applications related to geothermal leasing. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 7370 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Geothermal Energy 

3 Opportunity Act’’ or the ‘‘GEO Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EFFECT OF PENDING CIVIL ACTIONS ON PROC5 ESSING APPLICATIONS RELATED TO GEO6 THERMAL LEASING. 

7 Section 4 of the Geothermal Steam Act of 1970 (30 

8 U.S.C. 1003) is amended by adding at the end the fol9 lowing: 

10 ‘‘(h) EFFECT OF PENDING CIVIL ACTIONS ON PROC11 ESSING APPLICATIONS RELATED TO GEOTHERMAL LEAS12 ING.— 

13 ‘‘(1) REQUIREMENT TO PROCESS APPLICA14 TIONS.—Notwithstanding the existence of any pend15 ing civil action that affects an application for a geo16 thermal drilling permit, sundry notice, notice to pro17 ceed, right-of-way, or any other authorization under 

18 a valid existing geothermal lease, the Secretary shall, 

19 unless a United States Federal court vacates or pro20 vides injunctive relief for the applicable geothermal 

21 lease, geothermal drilling permit, sundry notice, no22 tice to proceed, right-of-way, or other authorization, 

23 approve and issue, or deny, each such application 

24 not later than 60 days after completing all require25 ments under applicable Federal laws and regula26 tions, including the National Environmental Policy 
3 

•HR 7370 EH

1 Act of 1969, the Endangered Species Act of 1973, 

2 and division A of subtitle III of title 54, United 

3 States Code. 

4 ‘‘(2) NO NEW AUTHORITY FOR FEDERAL

5 COURTS.—Nothing in this subsection shall be con6 strued as modifying any existing authority of a Fed7 eral court to vacate or provide injunctive relief for 

8 a geothermal lease, geothermal drilling permit, sun9 dry notice, notice to proceed, right-of-way, or other 

10 authorization. 

11 ‘‘(3) DEFINITION OF AUTHORIZATION.—In this 

12 subsection, the term ‘authorization’ means any li13 cense, permit, approval, finding, determination, or 

14 other administrative decision issued by a Federal 

15 agency, or any interagency consultation, that is re16 quired or authorized under Federal law or regula17 tions in order to site, construct, reconstruct, or com18 mence operations of a geothermal project adminis19 tered by a Federal agency.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 24, 

2024. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7370 

AN ACT 

To amend the Geothermal Steam Act of 1970 to 

related to geothermal leasing. establish a deadline for processing applications
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 8159** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. BRYANT EVERETT PLANTER, a/k/a B.P. , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk
. Mark S. Davis , District Judge. ( 2:10

- cr - 00168

- MSD

- FBS

- 1; 2:11

- cv - 00562

- MSD )

Submitted : March 26, 2013 Decided: March 29, 2013

Before DUNCAN, FLOYD, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Bryant Everett Planter, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia; Scott W. Putney, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Bryant Everett Planter seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2012 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that th e motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Planter has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealab ility and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-40646 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CARLOS OCHOA-HERNANDEZ, also known as Carlos Ochoa-Hernandez, also known as Jose Andreas Pineda-Hernandez, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-99-CR-22-1

-------------------- February 16, 2000 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender, appointed to represent Carlos Ochoa-Hernandez (“Ochoa”), has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Ochoa has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed a response. Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counselNo. 99-40646 - 2 - is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL
IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 24, 2014

s0616

Order 

Clerk

June 24, 2014

148461

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148461

COA: 318902

Kalamazoo CC: 2007-001823-FC

BRUCE LEE PARKER,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 2, 2014 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion 

for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7111 

To establish the policy of the United States that the United Nations Relief 

and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East should 

be disbanded completely, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 29, 2024 

Mr. MAST introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To establish the policy of the United States that the United 

Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees 

in the Near East should be disbanded completely, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘UNRWA Elimination 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. STATEMENT OF POLICY. 

7 It is the policy of the United States that— 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7111 IH

1 (1) the United Nations Relief and Works Agen2 cy for Palestine Refugees in the Near East 

3 (UNRWA) should be disbanded completely; and 

4 (2) all refugee services and responsibilities in 

5 the West Bank and Gaza strip should be transferred 

6 to the United Nations High Commissioner for Refu7 gees. 

8 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATIONS TO ADVANCE POLICY TO DIS9 BAND UNRWA. 

10 (a) IN GENERAL.—The President shall take such 

11 steps as may be necessary to advocate for and advance 

12 the policy described in section 2, including by— 

13 (1) coordinating international efforts to achieve 

14 the outcomes described in such section; and 

15 (2) ensuring that any facility of the United Na16 tions Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refu17 gees in the Near East in the United States is re18 moved. 

19 (b) FUNDING.—Any Federal funds made available to 

20 provide assistance to any foreign country shall include as 

21 a condition for receiving such funding that the country 

22 publicly supports the policy described in section 2. 

23 (c) PROHIBITION.—No Federal funds are authorized 

24 to be appropriated or otherwise made available to the 

25 United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7111 IH

1 Refugees in the Near East, including for the salaries or 

2 expenses of any employee of such Agency, and no form 

3 of United States support is authorized to be made avail4 able for the programs, projects, or activities of such Agen5 cy. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS