alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

 10 a.m., Thursday, March 4, 2010.

# PLACE:

 The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, 9th Floor, 601 New Jersey Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.

# STATUS:

 Open.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

                        The Commission will consider and act upon the following in open session:                         *Secretary of Labor*                         v.                        *Wolf Run Mining Company,*                         Docket No. WEVA 2008-804. (Issues include whether a violation of a safeguard notice issued by the Secretary may be designated as “significant and substantial.”)                    

Any person attending this meeting who requires special accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and 2706.160(d).

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

 Jean Ellen (202) 434-9950/(202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

Jean H. Ellen,

Chief Docket Clerk.

[FR Doc. 2010-3995 Filed 2-23-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE P
Editorial Note on Part 177
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 177 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 70 FR 72074, Dec. 1, 2005; and 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 177.1312 Ethylene-carbon monoxide copolymers. The ethylene-carbon monoxide copolymers identified in paragraph (a) of this section may be safely used as components of articles intended for use in contact with food subject to the provisions of this section. ( a ) *Identity.* For the purposes of this section, ethylene-carbon monoxide copolymers (CAS Reg. No. 25052-62-4) consist of the basic polymers produced by the copolymerization of ethylene and carbon monoxide such that the copolymers contain not more than 30 weight-percent of polymer units derived from carbon monoxide.
( b ) *Conditions of use.* ( 1 ) The polymers may be safely used as components of the food-contact or interior core layer of multilaminate food-contact articles.
( 2 ) The polymers may be safely used as food-contact materials at temperatures not to exceed 121 °C (250 °F).
( c ) *Specifications.* ( 1 ) Food-contact layers formed from the basic copolymer identified in paragraph (a) of this section shall be limited to a thickness of not more than 0.01 centimeter (0.004 inch).
( 2 ) The copolymers identified in paragraph (a) of this section shall have a melt index not greater than 500 as determined by ASTM method D1238-82, condition E “Standard Test Method for Flow Rates of Thermoplastics by Extrusion Plastometer,” which is incorporated by reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from the American Society for Testing Materials, 100 Barr Harbor Dr., West Conshohocken, Philadelphia, PA 19428-2959, or may be examined at the Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-200), Food and Drug Administration, 5001 Campus Dr., College Park, MD 20740, or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .*
( 3 ) The basic copolymer identified in paragraph (a) of this section, when extracted with the solvent or solvents characterizing the type of food and under the conditions of time and temperature characterizing the conditions of its intended use, as determined from tables 1 and 2 of § 176.170(c) of this chapter, yields net chloroform-soluble extractives in each extracting solvent not to exceed 0.5 milligram per square inch of food-contact surface when tested by methods described in § 176.170(d) of this chapter.
( 4 ) The provisions of this section are not applicable to ethylene-carbon monoxide copolymers complying with § 175.105 of this chapter.
[57 FR 32422, July 22, 1992]
#### Dalton Foundries, Inc., *v.*Dean

[No. 17,052.

Filed November 19, 1943.

Rehearing Denied January 11, 1944.]

*James L. Murray,*of Indianapolis *(Allan S. Widaman,*of Warsaw, of counsel) for appellant.

*Brubaker & Rockhill*and *Seth'E. Rowdabaugh,*all of Warsaw, for appellee.

Dowell, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Kosciusko Circuit Court upon a verdict in the amount of eight thousand dollars ($8,000) in a cause of action for damages for an occupational disease known as silicosis alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the appellant in not providing against the inhalation of silica dust during appellee’s eight years of employment in appellant’s foundry. Appellant’s alleged negligence is predicated upon a violation of ch. 142, Acts 1899, commonly known as the Factory Act, in its failure to exhaust dust from grinding wheels and other dust creating machinery and the common law negligence of failing to eliminate dust from the room where appellee was employed.

*290The cause was tried to- a jury resulting in a verdict for the appellee in the sum of eight thousand dollars ($8,000) with judgment accordingly.

Error assigned is the overruling of the motion for a new trial containing 7 specifications of which those numbered 3, 4 and 6 are expressly waived by appellant. Since specification 7 of thé motion is not discussed in appellant’s brief we must treat it also as waived.

The remaining specifications question the sufficiency of the evidence, assert that the verdict is contrary to law and assail as erroneous the refusal of the trial court to give appellant’s instructions numbered 5 and 6.

All questions raised thereby are identical with those presented in the case of *The Dalton Foundries Incorporated v*. *Arnold Jefferies*(1943), *Ante*p. 271, 51 N. E. (2d) 13, decided by this court during the present term. That case is decisive of all such questions.

Judgment affirmed.

Note — Reported in 51 N. E. (2d) 397.
§ 163.150 Sweet cocoa and vegetable fat coating. ( a ) *Description.* Sweet cocoa and vegetable fat coating is the food that conforms to the definition and standard of identity, and is subject to the requirements for label declaration of ingredients for sweet chocolate in § 163.123, except that: ( 1 ) In the preparation of the product, cocoa or a mixture of cocoa and chocolate liquor is used in such quantity that the finished food contains not less than 6.8 percent by weight of nonfat cacao solids, calculated on a moisture-free basis;
( 2 ) One or more optional ingredients specified in paragraph (b) of this section are used; and
( 3 ) The requirement in § 163.123(a)(2) limiting the total milk solids content to less than 12 percent by weight does not apply.
( b ) *Optional ingredients.* ( 1 ) Breakfast cocoa, cocoa, lowfat cocoa;
( 2 ) Chocolate liquor;
( 3 ) Safe and suitable vegetable derived fats, oils, and stearins other than cacao fat. The fats, oils, and stearins may be hydrogenated;
( 4 ) Safe and suitable dairy-derived ingredients; and
( 5 ) Safe and suitable bulking agents, formulation aids, humectants, and texturizers.
( c ) *Nomenclature.* The name of the food is “sweet cocoa and vegetable fat coating”. Alternatively, the common or usual name of the vegetable derived fat ingredient may be used in the name of the food, e.g., “sweet cocoa and ______ oil coating”, the blank being filled in with the common or usual name of the specific vegetable fat used.
----

----

| Name of Subsidiary                                                  |   | Percentage of Ownership |   | Jurisdiction of Incorporation |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
| Ellomay Clean Energy Ltd.                                           |   |                    | 100    | %                             | Israel |
| Ellomay Clean Energy LP                                             |   |                    | 100    | %                             | Israel |
| Ellomay Luxemburg Holdings S.àr.l.                             |   |                    | 100    | %                             | Luxemburg |
| Ellomay PV One S.r.l.                                               |   |                    | 100    | %1                            | Italy |
| Ellomay PV Two S.r.l.                                               |   |                    | 100    | %1                            | Italy |
| Ellomay PV Five S.r.l.                                              |   |                    | 100    | %1                            | Italy |
| Ellomay PV Six S.r.l.                                               |   |                    | 100    | %1                            | Italy |
| Ellomay PV Seven S.r.l. (formerly Energy Resources Galatina S.r.l.) |   |                    | 100    | %1                            | Italy |
| Pedale S.r.l.                                                       |   |                    | 100    | %1                            | Italy |
| Luma Solar S.r.l.                                                   |   |                    | 100    | %1                            | Italy |
| Murgia Solar S.r.l.                                                 |   |                    | 100    | %1                            | Italy |
| Ellomay Spain S.L.2                                            |   |                    | 85     | %1                            | Spain |

|   | 1. | Held by Ellomay Luxemburg Holdings S.àr.l. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | Ellomay Spain owns 21 Spanish companies, each holding a 90 kW solar installation portion of the Riconada II, the first named Energía Solar Fotovoltaica Parque 15, S.L. and the others bear a similar name with references to different numbers (16-34 and 69). |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

----
Exhibit 32 (b)
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
(15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78(d)); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Partnership.
 Date: 5-12-11
 /s/ GARY S. JONESGary S. JonesPresident A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Northland Cable Properties Seven Limited Partnership and will be retained by Northland Cable
Properties Seven Limited Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

July 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
130430 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly PEOPLE OF THE STAT E OF MICHIGAN, Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Plaintiff-Appellee, Stephen J. Markman, Justices v SC: 130430 COA: 255574 Wayne CC: 03-014112 TEJUAN LAWRENCE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e December 6, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0724 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 31, 2006

Clerk
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Momentum  Biofuels,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"). I, Gregory
A. Enders, President of the company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350,
as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of
                operations of the Company.


                                         /s/ Gregory A. Enders
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Gregory A. Enders, President
Date: August 19, 2008
# EUR-Lex - 31980R2530 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31980R2530

**Council Regulation (EEC) No 2530/80 of 30 September 1980 amending Regulation (EEC) No 315/68 fixing the quality standards for flowering bulbs, corms and tubers **

*
Official Journal L 259 , 02/10/1980 P. 0006 - 0007 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 12 P. 0132 Greek special edition: Chapter 03 Volume 31 P. 0022 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 12 P. 0132 Spanish special edition: Chapter 03 Volume 19 P. 0062 Portuguese special edition Chapter 03 Volume 19 P. 0062 *

COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) No 2530/80 of 30 September 1980 amending Regulation (EEC) No 315/68 fixing the quality standards for flowering bulbs, corms and tubers

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 234/68 of 27 February 1968 on the establishment of a common organization of the market in live trees and other plants, bulbs, roots and the like, cut flowers and ornamental foliage (1), and in particular Article 3 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Whereas Council Regulation (EEC) No 315/68 of 12 March 1968 fixing the quality standards for flowering bulbs, corms and tubers (2), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 338/77 (3), lays down in the Annex thereto provisions concerning size gradings ; whereas those provisions do not cover products Allium neapolitanum, Ixia, Eranthis cilicica and hiemalis, Fritillaria meleagris, its cultivars and hybrids and Sparaxis tricolor, its cultivars and hybrids ; whereas those products should be included in that Annex in order to achieve the purposes of the quality standards more satisfactorily;

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The products listed in the Annex to this Regulation, together with the provisions relating to each of them, shall be inserted in the Table in Section III of the Annex to Regulation (EEC) No 315/68, in their respective alphabetical positions.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

It shall apply with effect from 1 July 1981.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 September 1980.

For the Council

The President

C. NEY (1)OJ No L 55, 2.3.1968, p. 1. (2)OJ No L 71, 21.3.1968, p. 1. (3)OJ No L 48, 19.2.1977, p. 1.

ANNEX

>PIC FILE= "T0015761">
Family Bargain Corporation
                    Computation of Net Loss Per Common Share
                 (Dollars in Thousands, except per share data)
                                  (Unaudited)


                                      13 Weeks Ended         26 Weeks Ended

                                 Aug 1, 1998 Aug 2, 1997 Aug 1, 1998 Aug 2, 1997

The computation of net
 (loss) available & adjusted
 shares outstanding follows:
Net loss                           $ (1,077)   $ (4,170)   $ (6,617)   $ (5,530)
Less: Preferred stock dividends    $ (1,592)   $ (1,499)   $ (3,159)   $ (3,020)
                                           
Net (loss) used for basic and                           
        diluted computation        $ (2,669)   $ (5,669)   $ (9,776)   $ (8,550)
                                 =========== =========== =========== ===========
Weighted average number of
 common shares outstanding        5,004,122   4,929,822   4,967,446   4,873,949
Add:
  Assumed exercise of those
  options that are common stock
  equivalents
                                          -           -           -           -
  Assumed exercise of
  convertible preferred stock             -           -           -           -
Adjusted shares outstanding,
  used for basic & diluted
  computation                     5,004,122   4,929,822   4,967,446   4,873,949
                                 =========== =========== =========== ===========
Net loss applicable to common
 stock per common & common
 share equivalent                   $ (0.53)    $ (1.15)    $ (1.97)    $ (1.75)
                                 =========== =========== =========== ===========
2013 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

9-11-2013

USA v. Joseph Konrad

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential

Docket No. 12-1393

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2013

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2013 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"USA v. Joseph Konrad" (2013). 2013 Decisions. Paper 150.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2013/150
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 12-1393

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

JOSEPH KONRAD,

 Appellant

(E.D. Pa. No. 2-11-cr-00015-001)

ORDER

It appears that the opinion and judgment entered on September 5, 2013 in the above 

appeal was entered prematurely. At the direction of the Court, the opinion and judgment 

are vacated and a new opinion and judgment will be entered at the appropriate time.

For the Court,

Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk

Date: September 11, 2013

Tnh/cc: All Counsel of Record
Editorial Note on Part 184
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 184 appear at 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; and 81 FR 49897, July 29, 2016.

§ 184.1697 Riboflavin-5′-phosphate (sodium). ( a ) Riboflavin-5′-phosphate (sodium) (C17H20N4O9PNa·2H2O, CAS Reg. No 130-40-5) occurs as the dihydrate in yellow to orange-yellow crystals. It is prepared by phosphorylation of riboflavin with chlorophosphoric acid, pyrophosphoric acid, metaphosphoric acid, or pyrocatechol cyclic phosphate.
( b ) The ingredient meets the specifications of the Food Chemicals Codex, 3d Ed. (1981), p. 263, which is incorporated by reference. Copies are available from the National Academy Press, 2101 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington DC 20418, or available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .*
( c ) In accordance with § 184.1(b)(1), the ingredient is used in food with no limitation other than current good manufacturing practice. The affirmation of this ingredient as generally recognized as safe (GRAS) as a direct human food ingredient is based upon the following current good manufacturing practice conditions of use: ( 1 ) The ingredient is used as a nutrient supplement as defined in § 170.3(o)(20) of this chapter.
( 2 ) The ingredient is used in milk products, as defined in § 170.3(n)(31) of this chapter, at levels not to exceed current good manufacturing practice. The ingredient may also be used in infant formulas in accordance with section 412(g) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) or with regulations promulgated under section 412(a)(2) of the Act.
( d ) Prior sanctions for this ingredient different from the uses established in this section do not exist or have been waived.
[48 FR 51148, Nov. 7, 1983]
#### GRIFFIN *v.*GRIFFIN.

Divorce — Custody of Children — Decree — Modification — Jurisdiction.

Under section 8632, 3 Comp. Laws, the circuit court has jurisdiction, after granting a divorce and giving complainant the custody of the child until the further order of the court, to entertain a petition by defendant for a change in the decree as to the custody of the child, and, after hearing, grant it.

Appeal from Shiawassee; Miner, J.

Submitted October 15, 1908.

(Docket No. 95.)

Decided November 2, 1908.

Bill by John A. Griffin against Phoebe E. Griffin for a divorce. There was a decree for complainant, and the custody of a minor child was temporarily given to him. Defendant afterwards petitioned for the custody of said child, and from an order granting the petition, complainant appeals.

Affirmed.

*Frank L. Doty,*for complainant.

*Jason E. Nichols,*for defendant.

Moore, J.

The complainant filed a bill of complaint • for the purpose of obtaining a decree of divorce. The defendant’s default was taken. Before the decree was granted a hearing was had in relation to who should have the custody of a minor child. The judge said at the close of the hearing:

> ‘ ‘ I think I will give the complainant a decree for divorce; but the question of the child is of more importance, and that is why I have taken in this last evidence in the case, or the court had it taken. I think I will give the complainant the custody of the child until the further order of the court.”

*537A decree was entered accordingly. Later the defendant petitioned for a change in the decree as to the custody of the child, and after a full hearing her petition was granted. From that order the case is brought here by appeal. ,

It is the claim of appellant that the court had no right to make this order. Section 8630, 3 Comp. Laws, confers upon the court the right to determine who shall have the custody of the minor children during the pendency of the divorce proceedings. The following section authorizes the court, upon the disposition of the divorce case, to make such further decree as to the custody of minor children as it shall deem just and proper. Section 8632 provides in terms that the court may, from time to time afterwards, revise and alter such decree.

The decree of the court below is affirmed, with costs.

Grant, C. J., and Blair, Hooker, and McAlvay, JJ., concurred.