alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Thecertifications set forth below are hereby submitted to the Securities andExchange Commission pursuant to, and solely for the purpose of complying with, Section 1350of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code in connection with thefiling on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission of theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterended June 30, 2010.

 

Eachof the undersigned hereby certifies in their capacity as an officer of CitizensBancshares Corporation and subsidiary (the “Company”) that, to their knowledgeon the date of this certification, the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Qfor the period ended June 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of suchperiod and the results of operations of the Company for such period.

 

 
| Date:   August 13, 2010 | By:                                    | /s/  James E. Young |
|----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|---------------------|
|                                   | James  E. Young                        |
|                                   | President  and Chief Executive Officer |
|                                   |                                   |                |
|                                   |                                   |                |
| Date:   August 13, 2010 | By:                                    | /s/  Cynthia N. Day |
|                                   | Cynthia  N. Day                        |
|                                   | Senior  Executive Vice President and   |
|                                   | Chief  Operating Officer               |
|                                   |                                   |                |
|                                   |                                   |                |
| Date:   August 13, 2010 | By:                                    | /s/  Samuel J. Cox  |
|                                   | Samuel  J. Cox                         |
|                                   | Executive  Vice President and          |
|                                   | Chief  Financial Officer               |

 

1

----
§ 310.518 Drug products containing iron or iron salts. Drug products containing elemental iron or iron salts as an active ingredient in solid oral dosage form, e.g., tablets or capsules shall meet the following requirements: ( a ) *Labeling.* ( 1 ) The label of any drug in solid oral dosage form (e.g., tablets or capsules) that contains iron or iron salts for use as an iron source shall bear the following statement: WARNING: Accidental overdose or iron-containing products is a leading cause of fatal poisoning in children under 6. Keep this product out of reach of children. In case of accidental overdose, call a doctor or poison control center immediately.
( 2 ) ( i ) The warning statement required by paragraph (a)(1) of this section shall appear prominently and conspicuously on the information panel of the immediate container label.
( ii ) If a drug product is packaged in unit-dose packaging, and if the immediate container bears labeling but not a label, the warning statement required by paragraph (a)(1) of this section shall appear prominently and conspicuously on the immediate container labeling in a way that maximizes the likelihood that the warning is intact until all of the dosage units to which it applies are used.
( 3 ) Where the immediate container is not the retail package, the warning statement required by paragraph (a)(1) of this section shall also appear prominently and conspicuously on the information panel of the retail package label.
( 4 ) The warning statement shall appear on any labeling that contains warnings.
( 5 ) The warning statement required by paragraph (a)(1) of this section shall be set off in a box by use of hairlines.
( b ) The iron-containing inert tablets supplied in monthly packages of oral contraceptives are categorically exempt from the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section.
[68 FR 59715, Oct. 17, 2003]
#### Chester J. CHALUPOWSKI, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. Janis M. BERRY, Defendant, Appellee.

No. 05-1193.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

Sept. 27, 2005.

Chester J. Chalupowski, Jr., on brief pro se.

Thomas F. Reilly, Attorney General, and David Hadas, Assistant Attorney General, on brief for appellee.

*2Before BOUDIN, Chief Judge, SELYA and HOWARD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the denial of a motion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(6). The district court dismissed the pro se appellants’ civil rights suit with prejudice on motion of the defendant. It then summarily denied the appellants’ Rule 60(b) motion, which asserted that they had not received notice that the court was considering dismissal of their suit. We affirm.

On this record, we conclude that the dismissal of the suit without notice did not affect the appellants’ substantial rights, and so the denial of Rule 60(b) relief was proper. *See Transaero, Inc. v. La Fuerza Area Boliviana,*24 F.3d 457, 462 (2d Cir.1994) (stating that a Rule 60(b) motion based on lack of notice may be denied where there is no prejudice to substantial rights). Even if the appellants had received notice of the motion to dismiss, their official capacity suit for injunc-tive and declaratory relief would have been properly dismissed based on *Younger*abstention principles. Appellants asked the federal court to order the defendant, a state court appellate judge before whom a motion for contempt was then the only pending matter, to recuse herself “from further hearing in this matter.” This the court could not do. *See Juidice v. Vail,*430 U.S. 327, 335, 97 S.Ct. 1211, 51 L.Ed.2d 376 (1977) (applying *Younger*to a case seeking to enjoin state court judges from pursuing contempt proceedings against the plaintiffs); *accord Casa Marie, Inc. v. Superior Court of Puerto Rico,*988 F.2d 252, 263 (1st Cir.1993); *Gersten v. Rundle,*833 F.Supp. 906, 912-13 (S.D.Fla. 1993); *Williams v. North,*638 F.Supp. 457, 463 (D.Md.1986).

A dismissal based on *Younger*is without prejudice. *Maymo-Melendez v. Alvarez-Ramirez,*364 F.3d 27, 32 n. 4 (1st Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 110, 160 L.Ed.2d 120 (2004). Therefore, insofar as appellants brought an official capacity suit seeking injunctive and declaratory relief, we affirm but direct the district court to modify its judgment to be without prejudice. *See Caldwell v. Camp,*594 F.2d 705, 708 (8th Cir.1979) (directing such modification under similar circumstances). Insofar as the individual capacity suit was dismissed with prejudice based on the defendant’s absolute immunity from suit, we affirm. *See Bagby v. Brondhaver,*98 F.3d 1096, 1100 (8th Cir.1996) (concluding that defendant was entitled to qualified immunity and remanding to the district court with instructions to dismiss with prejudice); *Clark v. Brown,*861 F.2d 66, 67 (4th Cir.1988) (same); *see also Romero-Barcelo v. Hernandez-Agosto,*75 F.3d 23, 26 (1st Cir.1996) (affirming “in all respects” a with prejudice dismissal based on absolute legislative immunity).

*Affirmed and remanded for the limited purpose of making the modification described herein.*
[No. 39074-1-I.

Division One.

May 27, 1997.]

#### Key Bank of Washington, *Appellant,*v. Eric Kuboth, et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 96-2-10183-4, Jim Bates, J., entered June 26, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Agid, J., concurred in by Kennedy, A.C.J., and Grosse, J.
-1- 



    	 



    








    	-2- 



    	 



    

 






    	-3- 



    	 



    








    	-4- 



    	 



    








    	-5- 



    	 



    








    	-6- 



    	 



    





    	-7- 



    	 



    




 






    	-8- 



    	 



    








    	-9- 



    	 



    








    	-10- 



    	 



    








    	-11- 



    	 



    








    	-12-
Exhibit 23.1










The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Viatel, Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement No. 333-
15155 on Form S-8 and in the registration statement No. 333-16671 on Form S-8 of
Viatel, Inc. of our report dated March 4, 1998, except as to note 13(c) which is
as of March 18, 1998,  relating to the  consolidated  balance  sheets of Viatel,
Inc.  and  Subsidiaries  as of  December  31,  1996  and  1997  and the  related
consolidated  statements of operations,  stockholders'  equity  (deficiency) and
cash flows for each of the years in the  three-year  period  ended  December 31,
1997,  and the related  schedule,  which appears in the December 31, 1997 annual
report on Form 10-K of Viatel, Inc.


                                   /s/ KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP


New York, New York
March 27, 1998
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:**Culturallandscape report for Vanderbilt Mansion National Historic Site
 
v.1|v.2|
 
SuDoc Number:I 29.86/4:1/V.1-2
Item Number:0646-N-03 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001098015
April 29, 2019
Editorial Note on Part 184
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 184 appear at 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; and 81 FR 49897, July 29, 2016.

§ 184.1490 Methylparaben. ( a ) Methylparaben is the chemical methyl *p*-hydroxybenzoate. It is produced by the methanol esterification of *p*-hydroxybenzoic acid in the presence of sulfuric acid, with subsequent distillation.
( b ) The ingredient meets the specifications of the “Food Chemicals Codex,” 3d Ed. (1981), p. 199, which is incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the National Academy Press, 2101 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20418, or may be examined at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .*
( c ) The ingredient is used as an antimicrobial agent as defined in § 170.3(o)(2) of this chapter.
( d ) The ingredient is used in food at levels not to exceed good manufacturing practices. Current good manufacturing practice results in a maximum level of 0.1 percent in food.
( e ) Prior sanctions for this ingredient different from the uses established in this regulation do not exist or have been waived.
[42 FR 14653, Mar. 15, 1977, as amended at 49 FR 5612, Feb. 14, 1984]
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

SEAN JACOBY WILSON, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-4714 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed January 2, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Laura E. Ward, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Joanna Beth Conner, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, BLACK, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
#### § 1306.01 Scope of part 1306.

Rules governing the issuance, filling and filing of prescriptions pursuant to section 309 of the Act (21 U.S.C. 829) are set forth generally in that section and specifically by the sections of this part.
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION**     Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the UnitedStates Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Nathan Zommer, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of IXYS Corporation (the “Company”), and Uzi Sasson, Chief Operating Officer, ChiefFinancial Officer and Vice President of Finance of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to thebest of his knowledge:1. The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2007, to which thisCertification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Annual Report”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as amended; and2. The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.     **In Witness Whereof**, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 14th day of June,2007.   /s/ Nathan Zommer /s/ Uzi Sasson   Nathan Zommer Uzi SassonChairman of the Board, President Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officerand Chief Executive Officer and Vice President of FinanceThis certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing ofIXYS Corporation under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of anygeneral incorporation language contained in such filing.
§ 20.49 Denial of a request for records. ( a ) A denial of a request for records, in whole or in part, shall be signed by the Director, Division of Freedom of Information (or delegatee).
( b ) The name and title or position of each person who participated in the denial of a request for records shall be set forth in the letter denying the request. This requirement may be met by attaching a list of such individuals to the letter.
( c ) A letter denying a request for records, in whole or in part, shall state the reasons for the denial, the appropriate review official and address to which the appeal should be sent, and that an appeal must be transmitted within 90 calendar days from the date of the adverse determination, in accordance with 45 CFR 5.61. The Agency will also make a reasonable effort to include in the letter an estimate of the volume of the records denied, unless providing such an estimate would harm an interest protected by an exemption under the Freedom of Information Act. This estimate will ordinarily be provided in terms of the approximate number of pages or some other reasonable measure. This estimate will not be provided if the volume of records denied is otherwise indicated through deletions on records disclosed in part. The letter will also include contact information for the Freedom of Information Act Public Liaison and the Office of Government Information Services.
[42 FR 15616, Mar. 22, 1977, as amended at 46 FR 8457, Jan. 27, 1981; 55 FR 1405, Jan. 16, 1990. Redesignated and amended at 68 FR 25286, 25287, May 12, 2003; 87 FR 55913, Sept. 13, 2022]
**Exhibit 32.2**
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Front Range Capital Corporation (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alice M. Voss, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:
 (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    /s/ Alice M. Voss   Alice M. Voss Chief Financial Officer
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to FrontRange Capital and will be retained by Front Range Capital Corporation and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 10.50


                              Note to Exhibit 10.50



         The following Participation Agreement is substantially identical in all
material respects to five additional Participation Agreements except as
follows:


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Owner Participant                              Date                             Aircraft (Tail No.)
-----------------                              ----
<S>                                            <C>                              <C>
NCC Charlie Company*                           September 10, 1998*              N575ML*
NCC Charlie Company                            September 10, 1998               N576ML
General Electric Capital Corporation           November 10, 1998                N577ML
General Electric Capital Corporation           November 10, 1998                N578ML
Castle Harbour Leasing Inc.                    December 10, 1998                N579ML
NCC Charlie Company                            January 25, 1999                 N580ML
</TABLE>





------------------

*   Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
    quarter ended September 30, 1998.
[No. 39540-8-I.

Division One.

October 27, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Stacy Stith, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 96-1-02671-5, JoAnne Alumbaugh, J., entered October 18, 1996. *Affirmed in part*and *reversed in part*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7351 

To allow individuals with disabilities to campaign for elected office without 

losing access to federally supported benefits. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2024 

Ms. DEAN of Pennsylvania (for herself and Ms. SCANLON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To allow individuals with disabilities to campaign for elected 

office without losing access to federally supported benefits. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Removing Access Bar5 riers to Running for Elected Office for People with Dis6 abilities Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7351 IH

1 SEC. 2. DISREGARDING CAMPAIGN WORK PERFORMED BY 

2 INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES FOR PUR3 POSES OF FEDERALLY SUPPORTED BENE4 FITS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Any campaign work performed by 

6 a qualified individual, and any compensation received by 

7 such individual for such work, shall be disregarded for the 

8 purpose of determining such individual’s eligibility for, 

9 and amount of, benefits or assistance under any Federal 

10 program or under any State or local program financed in 

11 whole or in part with Federal funds. 

12 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

13 (1) CAMPAIGN WORK.—The term ‘‘campaign 

14 work’’ means work performed by an individual as a 

15 candidate for an elected Federal, State, or local of16 fice. 

17 (2) QUALIFIED INDIVIDUAL.—The term ‘‘quali18 fied individual’’ means an individual who is entitled 

19 to a benefit under title II or XVI of the Social Secu20 rity Act (42 U.S.C. 401 et seq., 1381 et seq.) by 

21 reason of a disability. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
[No. 39671-4-I.

Division One.

November 3, 1997.]

#### Charlotte Gordon, et al., *Appellants,*v. Safeway, Inc., et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 94-2-32816-6, Robert S. Lasnik, J., entered October 21, 1997. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-2591

_____________________________

MARQUIS ANTONIO CORBITT,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

Mark W. Moseley, Judge.

January 16, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, WETHERELL, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Marquis Antonio Corbitt, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1
 
                     UNISON SOFTWARE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
                    COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE (1)
 
                     (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
 
                                  (UNAUDITED)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               TWELVE MONTHS ENDED
                                                    ------------------------------------------
                                                    MAY 31, 1995   MAY 31, 1996   MAY 31, 1997
                                                    ------------   ------------   ------------
<S>                                                 <C>            <C>            <C>
Weighted average common shares outstanding for the
  period..........................................      8,476         10,995         11,719
Common equivalent shares pursuant to Staff
  Accounting Bulletin No. 83......................        339
Common equivalent shares assuming conversion of
  stock options and warrants under the treasury
  stock method....................................        110            780            373
                                                       ------      ------------   ------------
Shares used in per share calculation..............      8,925         11,775         12,092
                                                       ------      ------------   ------------
                                                       ------      ------------   ------------
Net income........................................     $1,700        $ 4,667        $ 5,382
                                                       ------      ------------   ------------
                                                       ------      ------------   ------------
Net income per share..............................     $ 0.19        $  0.40        $  0.45
                                                       ------      ------------   ------------
                                                       ------      ------------   ------------
</TABLE>
 
------------------------
 
(1) There is no difference between primary and fully diluted net income per
    share for all periods presented.
Toll Manufacturing of an 

alkanolamine acid anhydride 

reaction product