alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 27 , 2021.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 19

- 00900

- CR

JESUS VASQUEZ , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 178th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 15 91185

M EMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant appeals his conviction for possession with intent to deliver a
controlled substance. Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in which counsel concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief me ets the requirements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by assigning issues that might arguably support the appeal , and explaining why those issues do not raise arguable error

. See Gai nous v. State , 436 S.W.2d 137 , 138 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969 ).2

A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford
v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 512 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). At appellant’s request, the record was p ro vided to him. On December 7, 2020 , appellant filed a pro se response to counsel’s brief.
We have carefully reviewe d the record, counsel’s brief, and appellant’s pro

se response and agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we
find no reversible error in the record. We are not to address the merits of each
claim ra ised in an Anders brief or a pro se response when we have determined there are no arguable grounds for review. See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824,
827

– 28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2 005).

We affirm the trial court ’ s judgment

.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of J ustices Wise, Zimmerer, and Poissant. Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App

. P. 47.2( b).
<PAGE>

                                                       EXHIBIT 23.3
          
           
             CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the 
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 
33-62739) of United Stationers Inc. and in the related Prospectus of our 
report dated October 6, 1994 on the consolidated financial statements and 
schedule of United Stationers Inc. for the year ended August 31, 1994, and to 
all references to our Firm included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) of 
United Stationers Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1996.

                                   /S/ Arthur Andersen LLP


Chicago, Illinois
March 25, 1997
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2019010DE.01007501.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 14.1.2019 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 10/75 |

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) 2018/1042 der Kommission vom 23. Juli 2018 zur Änderung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 965/2012 in Bezug auf die technischen Anforderungen und Verwaltungsverfahren für die Einführung von Unterstützungsprogrammen, einer psychologischen Beurteilung der Flugbesatzung sowie von systematischen und stichprobenartigen Tests, bei denen die Flugbesatzung und Flugbegleiter zur Gewährleistung ihrer flugmedizinischen Tauglichkeit auf psychoaktive Substanzen getestet werden, sowie in Bezug auf die Ausrüstung neu gebauter turbinengetriebener Flugzeuge mit einer höchstzulässigen Startmasse von höchstens 5 700 kg und einer genehmigten Anzahl von sechs bis neun Fluggastsitzen mit einem Geländewarnsystem

(
[Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 188 vom 25. Juli 2018](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2018_188_R_TOC)
)

Seite 3, Erwägungsgrund 2:

Anstatt:

„Die Umsetzung einiger dieser Empfehlungen erfordert regulatorische Änderungen in Bezug auf die psychologische Beurteilung der Flugbesatzung vor Beginn eines Streckenflugs,“

muss es heißen:

„Die Umsetzung einiger dieser Empfehlungen erfordert regulatorische Änderungen in Bezug auf die psychologische Beurteilung der Flugbesatzung vor der erstmaligen Übernahme von Streckenflugeinsätzen,“

Seite 7, Anhang, Absatz 3 Buchstabe c zur Änderung von Anhang IV, Punkt CAT.GEN.MPA.175 Buchstabe b Einleitungssatz der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 965/2012:

Anstatt:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| „b) | Der Betreiber hat zu gewährleisten, dass die Flugbesatzung vor Beginn eines Streckenflugs einer psychologischen Beurteilung unterzogen wurde, um“ |

muss es heißen:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| „b) | Der Betreiber hat zu gewährleisten, dass die Flugbesatzung, bevor sie erstmals Streckenflugeinsätze übernimmt, einer psychologischen Beurteilung unterzogen wurde, um“. |

---
#### GRACE DiGESO AND ANGELO DiGESO, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. FRANKLIN WASHINGTON TRUST COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Submitted October 4, 1938

Decided February 6, 1939.

Before Brogan, Chief Justice, and Justices Bodine and Heher.

For the plaintiffs-appellants, *Edward J. Abromson.*

For the defendant-respondent, *Collins & Corbin (Edward A. Markley*and *James B. Emory).*

Bodine, J.

The plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of nonsuit. The plaintiff wife, a forelady employed by one of the tenants in the defendant’s building, sued for personal injuries suffered when she fell on an outside stone stairway designed for the use of the several tenants in the building, and their employes, the same being badly out of repair. Plaintiff’s foot, at the time of the accident, caught in a broken step and she was thrown down. The plaintiff’s husband also *153sued for loss of services and expenses incurred. The trial judge granted a nonsuit on the ground that the woman had voluntarily assumed the risk of a fall by using the stairs. We think the question was for the jury. The steps had been out of order for years and were the only means of ingress and egress for the tenants, and their employes, to their respective places of business.

A number of decisions in our courts indicate the view that the tenant, or the user of premises, may under certain circumstances assume the risk of the failure of the landlord to make repairs. *Vorralh*v. *Burke,*63 *N. J. L.*188; *Saunders*v. *Smith Realty Co.,*84 *Id.*276; *Rooney*v. *Siletti,*96 *Id.*312; *Harenburg*v. *August,*119 *Id.*83; *Castanzo*v. *Prudential Insurance Co.*(408 October term, 1938). A continued use of defective premises is some evideuce of the assumption of the ordinary risk incident to the use thereof. But the question where the invitee of the tenant has no other means of egress other than by the use of faulty steps, long out of repair, is a question for the jury and not for the court. The landlord being under a duty to repair the stairway in question and the injured woman by reason of her employment being required to use the stairway, it can hardly be said, as a matter of law, that she voluntarily assumed the risk of such use. At all events, being obliged to leave the building she may have used the stairway in such a manner that the jury might say that she had not contributed to her injury by reason of any negligence upon her part. *Marwedel*v. *Cook,*154 *Mass.*235; 28 *N. E. Rep.*140; *Herman*v. *Home Owners’ Loan Corp.,*120 *N. J. L.*437; *affirmed,*122 *N. J. L.*94.

The judgment is reversed, with costs.
---

---

# EXHIBIT 13

# CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTSUNDER 18 U.S.C 1350

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report
on Form 20-F of NUR Macroprinters Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned hereby certify that:

|A) | The Report containing the financial statements fully complies with the
          requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
          and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|B) | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
          the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | /s/ David Reis
David ReisPresident and Chief Executive Officer
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | /s/ Yosef Zylberberg
Yosef ZylberbergChief Financial Officer
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 13, 2006



---

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Education

# AGENCY:

Department of Education.

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        On February 18, 2010, the Department of Education published a 30-day comment period notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         (Page 7264, Column 3) seeking public comment for an information collection entitled, “Application for Grants under the Predominately Black Institutions Program”. This notice is hereby cancelled. Interested persons are invited to submit comments during the 60-day public comment period on or before March 8, 2010. Once the 60-day comment period ends, a 30-day public comment period notice will be published. The Acting Director, Information Collection Clearance Division, Regulatory Information                               ( print page 8316)                            Management Services, Office of Management, hereby issues a correction notice as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.                    

Dated: February 18, 2010.

James Hyler,

Acting Director, Information Collection Clearance Division, Regulatory Information Management Services, Office of Management.

[FR Doc. 2010-3689 Filed 2-23-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.1


May 4, 2017


PERSONAL & CONFIDENTIAL


<first_name> <last_name>
Board of Directors
BWX Technologies Inc.


RE:  2017 Director Equity Grant
    
Dear [Name]:


In accordance with the Non-Employee Director Compensation Program approved by the Board of Directors of BWX Technologies, Inc. (“BWXT”), you received a grant (the “Grant”) of [            ] Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”) under the 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan of BWXT (as amended to date, the “Plan”) on May 4, 2017 (the “Grant Date”).


Grant of RSUs.  You have been granted the number of RSUs indicated above. Each RSU represents a right to receive a share of BWXT common stock on the last day of the vesting period, which for this Grant is the same day as the Grant Date (the “Vesting Date”).


Settlement of RSUs.  RSUs will be settled in shares of BWXT common stock as soon as administratively practicable, but in no event later than 30 days, following the Settlement Date. For purposes hereof, “Settlement Date” means either: (a) the Vesting Date or (b) in the event you made a permitted deferral election pursuant to the Plan with respect to this Grant, the date(s) of the applicable distribution event in accordance with such deferral election.


Dividend, Voting Rights and Other Rights.  You shall have no rights of ownership in the shares of BWXT common stock underlying the RSUs and shall have no right to vote such shares until the date on which the shares are transferred to you pursuant hereto. To the extent that cash dividends are otherwise paid with respect to shares of BWXT common stock, dividend equivalents will be credited with respect to the shares underlying the RSUs and shall be deferred (with no earnings accruing) until and paid at the same time the underlying shares are transferred to you.


Tax Consequences.  BWXT has been advised that for U.S. federal income tax purposes, as of the Settlement Date, you will be deemed to have received compensation taxable as ordinary income equal to the Fair Market Value of the shares on the Settlement Date. You are solely responsible for the taxes associated with the Grant and you should consult with and rely on your own tax advisor, accountant or legal advisor as to the tax consequences to you of this Grant, including settlement.


Securities and Exchange Commission Requirements.  Because you are a Section 16 insider, this Grant must be reported on a Form 4 before the end of the second (2nd) business day following the Grant Date. You are also subject to Rule 144. This Rule is applicable only when the shares are sold, so you need not take any action under Rule 144 at this time.


Other Information.  If you have any questions concerning the aforementioned, please do not hesitate to contact __________ at ____________.


Very truly yours,


BWX TECHNOLOGIES, INC.






John A. Fees
Executive Chairman




ACCEPTED:
_________________________________         Date: __________
[NAME]
§ 507.105 Requirement to establish and implement a supply-chain program. ( a ) ( 1 ) Except as provided by paragraphs (a)(2) and (3) of this section, the receiving facility must establish and implement a risk-based supply-chain program for those raw materials and other ingredients for which the receiving facility has identified a hazard requiring a supply-chain-applied control.
( 2 ) A receiving facility that is an importer, is in compliance with the foreign supplier verification requirements under part 1, subpart L of this chapter, and has documentation of verification activities conducted under § 1.506(e) of this chapter (which provides assurance that the hazards requiring a supply-chain-applied control for the raw material or other ingredient have been significantly minimized or prevented) need not conduct supplier verification activities for that raw material or other ingredient.
( 3 ) The requirements in this subpart do not apply to animal food that is supplied for research or evaluation use, provided that such animal food: ( i ) Is not intended for retail sale and is not sold or distributed to the public;
( ii ) Is labeled with the statement “Animal food for research or evaluation use”;
( iii ) Is supplied in a small quantity that is consistent with a research, analysis, or quality assurance purpose, the animal food is used only for this purpose, and any unused quantity is properly disposed of; and
( iv ) Is accompanied with documents, in accordance with the practice of the trade, stating that the animal food will be used for research or evaluation purposes and cannot be sold or distributed to the public.
( b ) The supply-chain program must be written.
( c ) When a supply-chain-applied control is applied by an entity other than the receiving facility's supplier (*e.g.,* when a non-supplier applies controls to certain produce (*i.e.,* produce covered by part 112 of this chapter), because growing, harvesting, and packing activities are under different management), the receiving facility must: ( 1 ) Verify the supply-chain-applied control; or
( 2 ) Obtain documentation of an appropriate verification activity from another entity, review and assess the entity's applicable documentation, and document that review and assessment.
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2011-1040

----

## Continuous Resistivity Profiling Data From Great South Bay, Long Island, New York

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior |            U.S. Geological Survey           	URL: *http://pubsdata.usgs.gov/pubs/of/2011/1040/title_page.html*            Page Contact Information: GS Pubs Web Contact           	Page Last Modified: Thursday, 08-Dec-2016 00:30:00 EST
# m8833.docx

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 24.05.2018 C(2018) 3312 final To the notifying p arty Subject : Case M . 8833 – ALPS / ALPINE Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1 )( b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 1 and Article 57 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area 2 Dear Sir or Madam, 1. On 25 April 2018 , the European Commission received notification of a proposed conc entration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which the undertaking A lps Electric Co., Ltd. ( Japan) acquire s within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking Alpine Electronics, Inc. ( Japan) by way of purchase of shares . 3 2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are: - for Alps: the development, manufacture and sale of a wide range of electronic components used in a variety of applications such as automotive, household, healthcare, energy, and IT applications ; - for Alpine : the development, manufacture and sale of car infotainment systems (including its constituent components of car navigation, audio and visual systems), car sound systems, drive assist systems, and car information and telecommunication applications . 3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5 ( c ) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 . 4 4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1 )( b) of the Merger Regulation and Article 57 of the EEA Agreement . For the Commission
( Signed ) Johannes LAITENBERGER Director - General
(1)
OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ( the ' Merger Regulation ' ). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( ' TFEU ' ) has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of ' Community ' by ' Union ' and ' common market ' by ' internal market ' . The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.
(2) OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3 ( the ' EEA Agreement ' ).
(3) Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 155 , 03 . 5 . 2018 , p. 15 .
(4)
OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5 .
Family Bargain Corporation
                    Computation of Net Loss Per Common Share
                 (Dollars in Thousands, except per share data)
                                  (Unaudited)


                                      13 Weeks Ended         26 Weeks Ended

                                 Aug 1, 1998 Aug 2, 1997 Aug 1, 1998 Aug 2, 1997

The computation of net
 (loss) available & adjusted
 shares outstanding follows:
Net loss                           $ (1,077)   $ (4,170)   $ (6,616)   $ (5,530)
Less: Preferred stock dividends    $ (1,592)   $ (1,499)   $ (3,159)   $ (3,020)
                                           
Net (loss) used for basic and                           
        diluted computation        $ (2,669)   $ (5,669)   $ (9,775)   $ (8,550)
                                 =========== =========== =========== ===========
Weighted average number of
 common shares outstanding        5,004,122   4,929,822   4,967,446   4,873,949
Add:
  Assumed exercise of those
  options that are common stock
  equivalents
                                          -           -           -           -
  Assumed exercise of
  convertible preferred stock             -           -           -           -
Adjusted shares outstanding,
  used for basic & diluted
  computation                     5,004,122   4,929,822   4,967,446   4,873,949
                                 =========== =========== =========== ===========
Net loss applicable to common
 stock per common & common
 share equivalent                   $ (0.53)    $ (1.15)    $ (1.97)    $ (1.75)
                                 =========== =========== =========== ===========
Exhibit 32 (b)
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
(15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78(d)); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Partnership.
 Date: 8-13-10
 /s/ GARY S. JONESGary S. JonesPresident
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Northland Cable Properties Seven Limited Partnership and will be retained by Northland Cable
Properties Seven Limited Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
##### 



Exhibit 32(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350
(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Republic Bancorp Inc.
(the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that the
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: August 6, 2004
    
    /s/ Dana M. CluckeyName: Dana M. CluckeyTitle: President and Chief Executive Officer
 The foregoing certification (i) accompanies the filing and is being furnished
solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, (ii) will not be deemed filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the
liability of that section, and (iii) will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act,
except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by
reference. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Republic Bancorp Inc.
and will be retained by Republic Bancorp Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.