alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Southwall
Technologies Inc. (the “Company”), for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Mr. Dennis Capovilla, the Principal Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and





2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.








November  13,
      2008
            By:
            /s/
      Dennis F. CapovillaDennis
      F. CapovillaChief
      Executive Officer







A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.





In
accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K, this certification is being
“furnished” as Exhibit 32.1 to the Company's quarterly report and shall not
be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that
section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under
the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as expressly set forth by
specific reference in such a filing.
SDMS DocID 464468 

Superfund Property Reuse Evaluation Checklist for Reporting the Sitewide Ready 

for Anticipated Use GPRA Measure 

Note: Upon issuance of the Guidance for Documenting and Reporting Performance in Achieving Land 

Revitalization (March 1, 2007), the Sitewide Ready-for-Reuse measure was renamed "Sitewide Ready for 

Anticipated Use" (Sitewide RAU). 

SEPA 

United States 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

Washington, DC 20460 

SUPERFUND PROPERTY REUSE EVALUATION CHECKLIST FOR REPORTING THE 

SITEWIDE READY FOR ANTICIPATED USE GPRA MEASURE 

Office of Superfund Remediation & Technology Innovation and Federal Facilities Restoration & Reuse Office 

PART A^^GENERAL^T^IN^ ]2\ Z ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ -^^ ^ ^ _^ . ^ „ 

1. Site Name O'CONNOR CO. 

3. Site ID 0101031 

2. EPAID MED980731475 

4. RPM Terry Connelly 

5. Street Address EASTERN AVE, RTI 7 

6. City AUGUSTA 7. State ME 8. Zip Code 04330 

9. Site Wide Ready for Anticipated Use Determination Requirements (all must be met for the entire construction complete 

site) 

[Vi All cleanup goals in the Recofd(s) of Decision or other remedy decision document(s) have been achieved for 

any media that may affect current and reasonably anticipated future land uses, so that there are no 

anacceptable risks. 

All institutional or other controls required in the Record(s) of Decision or other remedy decision 

document(s) have been put in place. 

PART B7-^SIGNATURE^(Branch Chiif or above should gign) '^^ '"'JJ J "_^ ^ 

NOTE: The outcome of this Property Reuse Evaluation does not have any legally binding effect and does not expressly or implicitly create, expand, 

or limit any legal rights, obligations, responsibilities, expectations, or benefits of any party. EPA assumes no responsibility for reuse activities and/or 

any potential harm that might result from reuse activities. EPA retains any and all rights and authorities it has, including but not limited to legal, 

equitable, or administrative rights. EPA specifically retains any and all rights and authorities it has to conduct, direct, oversee, and/or require 

environmental response actions in connection with the site, including but not limited to instances when new or additional information has been 

discovered regarding the contamination or conditions at the site that indicates that the response and/or the conditions at the site are no longer 

protective of human health or the environment. 

10. Name 

12. Signature 

11. Title/Organization 

13. Datery 

EPA Form 9100-4 (9-2004) 

S'tfrrrfc'nd Records Cente r 

'Z\ 'Z. O-C r^i^^'^'<' CO
### Publication No. CH 604 TLMC MODEL

C L -600-2B16 (C L -604) A/C EFFECTIVITY

5301 TO 5665 

# T ime Limi t s /

Maintenance Checks

### CHALLENGER* 604

TIME LIMITS / MAINTENANCE CHECKS

Bombardier Aeros p ace

P

. O. Box 6087, S t ation Centre-ville

Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3C 3G9

http://ww w .cic.bombardie r .com

T

o ease the ordering process, the following Document

Identification Number should be used: CH 604 TLMC

It is understood that this documen t ation, comprising technical da t a and other information in any media

shall not be reproduced or disclosed in whole or in p art without Bombardier's written authorization, is

proprie t ary and confidential to Bombardier and that all righ t s to p atent, copyright, trademark, trade

secret and other intellectual property righ t s therein belong to Bombardie r

. Such documen t ation,

technical da t a and other information shall not be modified, translated, reverse assembled, reverse

engineered or de-compiled and shall be used solely to main t ain, operate or re p air the aircra f t.

Copyright © 1995-2011 by Bombardier Inc. All righ t s reserved.

* T rademark of Bombardier Inc. or i t s subsidiaries.

Printed in Canada For more information regarding T echnical Publications please cont act:

Bombardier Customer Services Business Aircraf t

Customer Response Center (CRC)

North America: 1-866-JET -1247 (1-866-538-1247)

Out side North America: 1-514-855-2999

Fax: 1-514-855-2535

Email: bbad.user .comment s@aero.bombardier .com

Distribution & Orderin g

Fax: 1-514-855-2770

Email: bbad.pubs.dist@aero.bombardier .com
<PAGE>


                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.8.1

                             FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE

                         SHORT TERM INVESTMENT AGREEMENT

This FIRST AMENDMENT ("Amendment") is dated as of January 1, 2002, by and
between WFS FINANCIAL INC, a California corporation ("WFS"), and WESTERN
FINANCIAL BANK, a federally chartered savings bank fka Western Financial Savings
Bank. F.S.B. (the "Bank"), and amends the SHORT TERM INVESTMENT AGREEMENT
("Agreement") entered into by the parties on January 1. 1996, pursuant to
certain short-term investment services provided by the Bank to WFS.

                                    RECITALS

The Agreement is being amended to reflect a change in the interest rate payable
by the Bank to WFS pursuant to the terms and conditions in the Agreement.

                                    AGREEMENT

In consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein, and in reliance upon
the recitals set forth above, the parties agree as follows:

1.    The third sentence in Clause 3 of the Agreement is hereby changed and
      replaced by the following sentences:

      "Interest shall be paid at a rate equal to 1-month LIBOR, and shall accrue
      daily. The LIBOR rate used shall be the LIBOR rate in effect on the last
      day of the prior month."

2.    Except as specifically amended herein, all terms of the Agreement shall
      remain in full force and effect.

Wherefore, the undersigned have executed this Amendment on the date set forth
below to be effective as of the date first set forth above.

WFS FINANCIAL INC                             WESTERN FINANCIAL BANK


----------------------------------            ----------------------------------
Thomas A. Wolfe, President and                Lee A. Whatcott,
Chief Operating Officer                       Senior Executive Vice President
                                              and Chief Financial Officer
November, 2001
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 24.1

                     POWER OF ATTORNEY OF PETER D. BEHRENDT

        KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned, Peter D. Behrendt,
hereby constitutes and appoints Michael D. Yonker or John V. Harker, his true
and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, for him and his name, place and stead, in
any and all capacities, to sign the Registration Statement on Form S-8 of In
Focus Systems, Inc., an Oregon corporation, and any amendments or supplements
thereto, and to file this Power of Attorney and the Form S-8, with all exhibits
thereto, and other documents in connection therewith with the Securities and
Exchange Commission and the Nasdaq National Market System, granting unto said
attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform each and
every thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as
fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby
ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent may do or
cause to be done by virtue hereof.

        Dated this 12th day of May, 1998.

Signature:


/s/ Peter D. Behrendt
------------------------
Peter D. Behrendt




                                     II-29
Office for Domestic Preparedness 

U.S. Department of Homeland Security 

Washington, DC 20531

ODP Information Bulletin 

No. 153 March 3, 2005 

TO All State Administrative Agency Heads 

 All State Administrative Agency Points of Contact 

 All Core City/Core County Points of Contact 

 All State Homeland Security Directors 

FROM: Matt Mayer 

 Acting Executive Director 

SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2005 Metropolitan Medical Response System Program 

On December 2, 2004, the Office for Domestic Preparedness (ODP) issued the Fiscal Year (FY) 

2005 Homeland Security Grant Program (HSGP) Program Guidelines and Application Kit. The 

FY 2005 HSGP includes the Metropolitan Medical Response System (MMRS) program which 

provides funding to 124 jurisdictions. The MMRS program establishes linkages among 

emergency responders, medical treatment resources, public health officials, emergency 

management offices, volunteer organizations, and other local elements to mitigate the effects of a 

catastrophic incident. 

States are reminded that MMRS funds must be expended to support efforts to establish and 

sustain enhanced local capabilities in MMRS jurisdictions so that they are prepared to respond to 

any mass casualty incident, including terrorism, disease outbreaks, and natural disasters. The 

intent of the MMRS program is to enhance these capabilities at the local level so that these 

jurisdictions can manage the aftermath of an incident until significant external assistance can 

arrive. MMRS jurisdictions may choose to allocate funding to the state to assist them in 

developing these capabilities. The MMRS Steering Committee Chair must provide written 

concurrence for the state to retain funds for these program purposes. Further, the MMRS 

jurisdictions have discretion to determine what level of funding, if any, they will allow the States 

to retain. As such, the MMRS jurisdictions are not constrained by the 20 percent cap on State 

retention of MMRS funds indicated in the program guidance.
§ 20.3 Certification and authentication of Food and Drug Administration records. ( a ) Upon request, the Food and Drug administration will certify the authenticity of copies of records that are requested to be disclosed pursuant to this part or will authenticate copies of records previously disclosed.
( b ) A request for certified copies of records or for authentication of records shall be sent in writing to the Division of Freedom of Information at the address located on the agency's web site at *http://www.fda.gov .*
[42 FR 15616, Mar. 22, 1977, as amended at 46 FR 8456, Jan. 27, 1981; 76 FR 31469, June 1, 2011; 79 FR 68114, Nov. 14, 2014]
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONS

 

I, John Low, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SpescomSoftware Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisquarterly report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared;

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

 

c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting

 

 
| Dated:  May 15, 2006 |
|--------------------------------|
|                           |
| /s/ John W. Low                |   |
| John W. Low                    |
|                           |
| Chief Financial Officer        |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                              
<ARTICLE>                                          5
<CIK>                                           0000812818
<NAME>                          HUTTON INVESTORS FUTURES FUND, L.P. II
                                                    
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                       JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                     20,482,385
<SECURITIES>                                                 (670,981)
<RECEIVABLES>                                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           19,811,404
<PP&E>                                                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             19,811,404
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         650,035
<BONDS>                                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                                 19,161,369
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               19,811,404
<SALES>                                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           (1,699,569)
<CGS>                                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               29,252
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            (1,728,821)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                               (1,728,821)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                 (449.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          345470
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   211679
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                563499
<PP&E>                                        19020246
<DEPRECIATION>                                 4368363
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                24385019
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           389289
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    19873694
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  24385019
<SALES>                                          15599
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2094790
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    63145
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                103272
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              116006
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1422014
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1422014
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1422014
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    23.99
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    23.99
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0351

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

ISAAC WILLIAM MACY,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including May 8, 2023, within which to prepare, file, and 

serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 29 2023

03/29/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0351
San Luis 

Valley 

Regional 

Airport 

Bergman 

Field 

PO Box 328 

2500 State Ave 

Alamosa, 

Colorado 81101 

719-589-4848 

719-589-1900 

^(^tM-Uff-csr-mi-iqCo 

May 27, 2010 

Ms. G. Renee Williams 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

W86-471 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Dear Ms. Williams: 

The San Luis Valley Regional Airport (SLV Regional Airport) Board of Control would like to offer 

the following comments. Our airport has been fortunate to have a current avenue for commercial 

aviation access, and while EAS has been a critical part of that opportunity, the sole vendor (Great 

Lakes Airlines) has not been as mindful of its responsibilities and customer obligations. 

Granted, Great Lakes was the only respondent to the Request For Proposal, and eventually received 

the EAS contract. Unfortunately, their commitment to their customers has been lacking, as flights 

are either cancelled or delayed on a regular basis. Commercial aviation service enables our regional 

customers to have access to a quicker mode of transportation and travel, and a one-hour flight to 

Denver appears to the most efficient method possible when faced with a four-hour drive by 

automobile. On more than one occasion, angry travelers have had to make other arrangements or 

revise schedules because Great Lakes has appeared to treat the SLV Regional Airport as an 

afterthought instead of a priority. 

Hopefully, the EAS agreements would have some performance targets or baseline service levels that 

Great Lakes Airlines would have to meet in order to continue to access the EAS funding. In this 

difficult economic turbulence, it would appear that an airline that is receiving a substantial subsidy 

from the federal government would make the effort to be successful. All we want is a commercial 

airline service that is reliable and responsible . . . one that understands that timely flights out of a 

rural regional airport area are a critical element of our transportation access. 

Another area of consideration would be the potential for additional flights from the SLV Regional 

Airport to Albuquerque or Phoenix. Currently, locals or tourists will drive to Albuquerque to 

facilitate their travel plans throughout the Southwestern United States, and the added air service 

would be a definite benefit to these consumers. 

Thank you for your consideration and the opportunity to comment. 

Sincerely, 

Barry Shioshita 

Manager, SLV Regional Airport
§ 20.60 Applicability of exemptions. ( a ) The exemptions established in this subpart shall apply to all Food and Drug Administration records, except as provided in subpart E of this part. Accordingly, a record that is ordinarily available for public disclosure in accordance with the provisions in subpart F of this part or of another regulation cross-referenced in § 20.100(c) is not available for such disclosure to the extent that it falls within an exemption contained in this subpart, except as provided by the limitations on exemptions specified in subpart E of this part. For example, correspondence that is ordinarily disclosable under § 20.103 is not disclosable to the extent that it contains trade secrets exempt from disclosure under § 20.61 and is not subject to discretionary release under § 20.82.
( b ) Where application of one or more exemptions results in a record being disclosable in part and nondisclosable in part, the rule established in § 20.22 shall apply.