76286 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 17, 2013 / Notices 

1Although pursuant to section 1017(a)(4)(E) of 

the Consumer Financial Protection Act, Public Law 

111–203, the CFPB is not required to comply with 

OMB-issued guidance, it voluntarily follows OMB 

privacy-related guidance as a best practice and to 

facilitate cooperation and collaboration with other 

agencies. 

will be announced at a later date in the 

Federal Register. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick 

DeVictor, Southeast Regional Office, 

telephone: 727–824–5305, or email: 

rick.devictor@noaa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

An NOI to prepare a DEIS for 

Regulatory Amendment 17 was 

published in the Federal Register on 

December 4, 2013 (78 FR 72867) and 

requested public comment through 

January 3, 2014. The NOI announced 

that the Council will consider 

alternatives to modify existing marine 

protected areas (MPAs) implemented 

through Amendment 14 to the Fishery 

Management Plan for the SnapperGrouper Fishery in the South Atlantic 

Region (74 FR 1621, January 13, 2009) 

and establish new MPAs within 

Regulatory Amendment 17. Through 

these proposed actions, the Council 

intends to further reduce bycatch 

mortality of speckled hind and warsaw 

grouper and increase protection to their 

deep-water habitat. 

In the NOI, NMFS announced scoping 

meeting dates, times, and locations that 

were scheduled to occur in January 

2014. However, at its December 2013 

meeting, the Council decided to 

continue development of Regulatory 

Amendment 17 but postpone the 

scoping meetings to a future date that is 

not yet known. The Council decided to 

delay the scoping meetings to allow the 

Council’s Snapper-Grouper Advisory 

Panel to consider additional scientific 

information, such as the predicted 

effectiveness of the proposed MPAs and 

to provide MPA recommendations to 

the Council based on that information. 

In addition, the Council decided to hold 

public meetings on their snappergrouper fishery visioning project before 

holding the Regulatory Amendment 17 

scoping meetings. This would allow for 

an improved decision making process 

that incorporates the results of the 

Council’s visioning project into the 

development of Regulatory Amendment 

17. NMFS will announce, through a 

document published in the Federal 

Register, the exact dates, times, and 

locations of future scoping meetings for 

Regulatory Amendment 17. 

Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq. 

Dated: December 11, 2013. 

Sean Corson, 

Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable 

Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service. 

[FR Doc. 2013–29852 Filed 12–16–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–22–P 

BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL 

PROTECTION 

Privacy Act of 1974, as Amended 

AGENCY: Bureau of Consumer Financial 

Protection. 

ACTION: Notice of a revised Privacy Act 

System of Records. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the 

Privacy Act of 1974, as amended, the 

Bureau of Consumer Financial 

Protection, hereinto referred to as the 

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau 

(CFPB or Bureau), gives notice of the 

establishment of a revised Privacy Act 

System of Records. 

DATES: Comments must be received no 

later than January 16, 2014. The new 

system of records will be effective 

January 27, 2014, unless the comments 

received result in a contrary 

determination. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

by any of the following methods: 

• Electronic: privacy@cfpb.gov. 

• Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier: Claire 

Stapleton, Chief Privacy Officer, 

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, 

1700 G Street NW., Washington, DC 

20552. 

Comments will be available for public 

inspection and copying at 1700 G Street 

NW., Washington, DC 20552 on official 

business days between the hours of 10 

a.m. and 5 p.m. Eastern Time. You can 

make an appointment to inspect 

comments by telephoning (202) 435– 

7220. All comments, including 

attachments and other supporting 

materials, will become part of the public 

record and subject to public disclosure. 

You should submit only information 

that you wish to make available 

publicly. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Claire Stapleton, Chief Privacy Officer, 

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, 

1700 G Street NW., Washington, DC 

20552, (202) 435–7220. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The CFPB 

revises its Privacy Act System of 

Records Notice (SORN) ‘‘CFPB.011— 

Correspondence Tracking Database.’’ In 

revising this SORN, the CFPB modifies 

the purpose(s) for which the system is 

maintained; the categories of 

individuals for the system; the 

categories of records for the system; the 

record source categories for the system; 

the method by which records are 

retrieved in the system; and the 

retention and disposal of records in the 

system. Additionally, as part of a 

biennial review of this System of 

Record, the CFPB modifies: the 

notification procedures for individuals 

seeking access to records maintained in 

this system; the system location and 

address; and makes several nonsubstantive changes to the routine use 

section to ensure compliance with the 

Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a. 

The report of the revised system of 

records has been submitted to the 

Committee on Oversight and 

Government Reform of the House of 

Representatives, the Committee on 

Homeland Security and Governmental 

Affairs of the Senate, and the Office of 

Management and Budget, pursuant to 

Appendix I to OMB Circular A–130, 

‘‘Federal Agency Responsibilities for 

Maintaining Records About 

Individuals,’’ dated November 30, 

2000,1 and the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 

552a(r). The revised system of records 

entitled ‘‘CFPB.011—Correspondence 

Tracking Database’’ is published in its 

entirety below. 

Dated: December 12, 2013. 

Claire Stapleton, 

Chief Privacy Officer, Bureau of Consumer 

Financial Protection. 

CFPB.011 

SYSTEM NAME: 

Correspondence Tracking Database 

SYSTEM LOCATION: 

Consumer Financial Protection 

Bureau, 1700 G Street NW., Washington, 

DC 20552. 

CATEGORIES OF INDIVIDUALS COVERED BY THE

SYSTEM: 

Individuals who submit 

correspondence, or who have 

correspondence submitted on their 

behalf to the CFPB, or who request to 

receive correspondence from the 

Bureau, and CFPB employees 

responsible for processing, reviewing, 

and/or responding to such 

correspondence. 

CATEGORIES OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM: 

Records in this system may contain 

(1) correspondence (including, without 

limitation, official letters, memoranda, 

faxes, telegrams, and emails) received 

and sent by the Bureau; (2) mailing lists 

of individuals who submit 

correspondence, or who have 

correspondence submitted on their 

behalf to the Bureau or request to 

receive correspondence from the 

Bureau; (3) identifying information 

regarding individuals who submit the 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 17, 2013 / Notices 76287 

correspondence, individuals or entities 

on whose behalf such correspondence is 

submitted, or individuals who request 

to receive correspondence from the 

Bureau, such as name, phone number, 

address, email address, and any other 

disclosed identifiable information; (4) 

information about the correspondence, 

including disposition, tracking dates, 

and where applicable, the type of 

correspondence; and (5) information 

concerning the CFPB employee 

responsible for processing the 

correspondence, including contact 

information, position or title, and 

information about internal assignments. 

Supporting records may include 

correspondence between the CFPB and 

the individual. This system does not 

contain all correspondence received or 

sent by the Bureau—for example, 

records related to consumer complaints 

will not be contained in this system— 

and some correspondence is maintained 

in other Bureau systems of records. 

AUTHORITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE SYSTEM: 

Public Law 111–203, Title X, Sections 

1011, 1012, 1013, codified at 12 U.S.C. 

5491, 5492, 5493. 

PURPOSE(S): 

The purpose of the Correspondence 

Tracking Database is to enable the CFPB 

to track correspondence, including 

responsibilities for processing, tracking, 

responding to, or referring sensitive 

and/or time-critical correspondence for 

appropriate processing and responsive 

action, and to manage mailing lists of 

individuals who submit correspondence 

to the Bureau, have correspondence 

submitted on their behalf, or have 

requested to receive correspondence 

from the Bureau. 

ROUTINE USES OF RECORDS MAINTAINED IN THE

SYSTEM, INCLUDING CATEGORIES OF USERS AND

THE PURPOSES OF SUCH USES: 

These records may be disclosed, 

consistent with the CFPB’s Disclosure of 

Records and Information Rules, 

promulgated at 12 CFR part 1070 et seq., 

to: 

(1) Appropriate agencies, entities, and 

persons when: (a) the CFPB suspects or 

has confirmed that the security or 

confidentiality of information in the 

system of records has been 

compromised; (b) the CFPB has 

determined that, as a result of the 

suspected or confirmed compromise, 

there is a risk of harm to economic or 

property interests, identity theft or 

fraud, or harm to the security or 

integrity of this system or other systems 

or programs (whether maintained by the 

CFPB or another agency or entity) that 

rely upon the compromised 

information; and (c) the disclosure made 

to such agencies, entities, and persons is 

reasonably necessary to assist in 

connection with the CFPB’s efforts to 

respond to the suspected or confirmed 

compromise and prevent, minimize, or 

remedy such harm; 

(2) Another federal or state agency to 

(a) permit a decision as to access, 

amendment or correction of records to 

be made in consultation with or by that 

agency, or (b) verify the identity of an 

individual or the accuracy of 

information submitted by an individual 

who has requested access to or 

amendment or correction of records; 

(3) The Office of the President in 

response to an inquiry from that office 

made at the request of the subject of a 

record or a third party on that person’s 

behalf; 

(4) Congressional offices in response 

to an inquiry made at the request of the 

individual to whom the record pertains; 

(5) Contractors, agents, or other 

authorized individuals performing work 

on a contract, service, cooperative 

agreement, job, or other activity on 

behalf of the CFPB or Federal 

Government and who have a need to 

access the information in the 

performance of their duties or activities; 

(6) The DOJ for its use in providing 

legal advice to the CFPB or in 

representing the CFPB in a proceeding 

before a court, adjudicative body, or 

other administrative body, where the 

use of such information by the DOJ is 

deemed by the CFPB to be relevant and 

necessary to the advice or proceeding, 

and such proceeding names as a party 

in interest: 

(a) The CFPB; 

(b) Any employee of the CFPB in his 

or her official capacity; 

(c) Any employee of the CFPB in his 

or her individual capacity where DOJ 

has agreed to represent the employee; or 

(d) The United States, where the 

CFPB determines that litigation is likely 

to affect the CFPB or any of its 

components; 

(7) A grand jury pursuant either to a 

federal or state grand jury subpoena, or 

to a prosecution request that such 

record be released for the purpose of its 

introduction to a grand jury, where the 

subpoena or request has been 

specifically approved by a court. In 

those cases where the Federal 

Government is not a party to the 

proceeding, records may be disclosed if 

a subpoena has been signed by a judge; 

(8) A court, magistrate, or 

administrative tribunal in the course of 

an administrative proceeding or judicial 

proceeding, including disclosures to 

opposing counsel or witnesses 

(including expert witnesses) in the 

course of discovery or other pre-hearing 

exchanges of information, litigation, or 

settlement negotiations, where relevant 

or potentially relevant to a proceeding, 

or in connection with criminal law 

proceedings; 

(9) Appropriate agencies, entities, and 

persons, to the extent necessary to 

respond to or refer correspondence; and 

(10) Appropriate federal, state, local, 

foreign, tribal, or self-regulatory 

organizations or agencies responsible for 

investigating, prosecuting, enforcing, 

implementing, issuing, or carrying out a 

statute, rule, regulation, order, policy, or 

license if the information may be 

relevant to a potential violation of civil 

or criminal law, rule, regulation, order, 

policy or license. 

POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR STORING, 

RETRIEVING, ACCESSING, RETAINING, AND

DISPOSING OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM: 

STORAGE: 

Paper and electronic records. 

RETRIEVABILITY: 

Records are retrievable by a variety of 

fields including, but not limited to, an 

individual’s name, email address or 

other contact information, by date of 

correspondence, topic of 

correspondence, correspondence control 

number or by some combination thereof. 

SAFEGUARDS: 

Access to electronic records is 

restricted to authorized personnel who 

have been issued non-transferrable 

access codes and passwords. Other 

records are maintained in locked file 

cabinets or rooms with access limited to 

those personnel whose official duties 

require access. 

RETENTION AND DISPOSAL: 

Per N1–587–12–06, records in this 

system are deleted or destroyed three (3) 

years after the calendar year in which it 

was created. 

SYSTEM MANAGER(S) AND ADDRESS: 

Consumer Financial Protection 

Bureau, Chief Operating Officer, 1700 G 

Street NW., Washington, DC 20552. 

NOTIFICATION PROCEDURE: 

Individuals seeking notification and 

access to any record contained in this 

system of records, or seeking to contest 

its content, may inquire in writing in 

accordance with instructions appearing 

the CFPB’s Disclosure of Records and 

Information Rules, promulgated at 12 

CFR part 1070 et seq. Address such 

requests to: Chief Privacy Officer, 

Bureau of Consumer Financial 

Protection, 1700 G Street NW., 

Washington, DC 20552. 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
76288 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 17, 2013 / Notices 

RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES: 

See ‘‘Notification Procedures’’ above. 

CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES: 

See ‘‘Notification Procedures’’ above. 

RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES: 

Information contained in the system 

will be collected from a variety of 

sources, including, without limitation, 

individuals who submit 

correspondence, or who have 

correspondence submitted on their 

behalf to the CFPB, or who have 

requested to receive correspondence 

from the Bureau, and CFPB employees 

responsible for processing, reviewing, 

and/or responding to such 

correspondence. 

EXEMPTIONS CLAIMED FOR THE SYSTEM: 

None. 

[FR Doc. 2013–29969 Filed 12–16–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4810–AM–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Department of the Army; Corps of 

Engineers 

Notice of Intent To Prepare a Draft 

Environmental Impact Statement and 

Dam Safety Modification Study Report 

for the Cherry Creek Project, Arapahoe 

County, Colorado 

AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. 

Army Corps of Engineers; DoD. 

ACTION: Notice of intent. 

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as 

amended, the U.S. Army Corps of 

Engineers, Omaha District (Corps) 

intends to prepare a draft 

Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) 

for the federal action to remediate dam 

safety concerns at Cherry Creek Dam. 

The dam safety concerns are primarily 

related to a hydrologic deficiency 

resulting from an extreme precipitation 

event and the large population that 

could be affected by such an event. 

Cherry Creek Dam and Lake is located 

on Cherry Creek, 11.4 miles upstream of 

its confluence with the South Platte 

River, in Aurora, Colorado (southeast 

Denver metropolitan area). The 

remediation actions will be identified 

through a Dam Safety Modification 

Study (DSMS) being conducted in 

accordance with Corps policy as 

described in Engineering Regulation 

1110–2–1156 ‘‘Safety of Dams—Policy 

and Procedures.’’ 

ADDRESSES: Omaha District Corps of 

Engineers, 1616 Capitol Ave, Omaha, 

NE 68102–4926 (Attn: Margaret Oldham 

CENWO–PAO). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Current and archival information 

regarding Cherry Creek Dam may be 

obtained by contacting the Omaha 

District. The point of contact is Margaret 

Oldham, Phone: (402) 995–2416; email: 

Margaret.E.Oldham@usace.army.mil. 

Questions or comments regarding the 

upcoming studies at Cherry Creek Dam 

should also be directed to Ms. Oldham. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

1. Background Information. The 

Cherry Creek Dam project was 

authorized in the 1940s for the primary 

purpose of protecting the city of Denver 

against floods from Cherry Creek. The 

dam is located in a densely populated 

area and provides flood protection to 

over 200,000 people. Starting in 2005, 

the Corps sought to better categorize the 

risk at all of its dams. Risk considers 

both the probability and consequences 

of a dam failure. Cherry Creek Dam 

received an elevated risk rating 

primarily because of the hydraulic 

deficiency resulting from an extreme 

precipitation event and the large 

population which is protected by the 

dam. Estimation of extreme 

precipitation events is based on the 

Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) 

for a given location. A PMP is an 

extremely rare event and is defined as 

the maximum amount of precipitation 

that could occur if all meteorological 

elements were optimal to allow a perfect 

environment for forming precipitation. 

The resulting stream flow from a PMP 

is a flood defined as the Probable 

Maximum Flood (PMF). 

Multiple past studies have indicated 

that Cherry Creek may not be able to 

adequately pass a PMF event. 

Hydrologic deficiency issues associated 

with Cherry Creek Dam were initially 

brought to light in 1970 after the 

National Weather Service (NWS) 

completed a site-specific PMP study of 

the upper South Platte River basin for 

the design of Chatfield Dam (a nearby 

dam on the South Platte River). 

Applying the 1970 PMP criteria to the 

Cherry Creek basin resulted in a larger 

stream flow than used in the project’s 

original design and indicated the dam 

had a potential hydrologic deficiency. 

Since 1970, the NWS and the Corps 

have completed several PMP and PMF 

estimates including a Cherry Creek 

basin, site-specific PMP study 

completed by the NWS in 1995. 

Applying the current estimate of the 

PMF, which is also based on the 1995 

PMP study, Cherry Creek Dam has a 

hydrologic deficiency even if the pool 

elevation at the start of the PMF was at 

normal operating levels. 

Because of the risk rating, Omaha 

District completed an Issue Evaluation 

Study (IES) in 2011 to further evaluate 

Cherry Creek Dam’s safety issues and 

corresponding risk. The IES findings 

were presented to a Senior Oversight 

Group (SOG) appointed by the Corps’ 

Headquarters. The SOG reviewed the 

IES and confirmed the risk rating for the 

dam. Omaha District was directed to 

proceed into a DSMS, which is 

currently under way, with the task of 

defining in detail the risk associated 

with the Cherry Creek Dam’s safety 

issues and assessing possible options for 

mitigating the risk. Those options may 

include federal actions which will be 

the subject of the EIS. 

2. Remediation Alternatives. The draft 

EIS will address an array of remediation 

alternatives that could reduce the risk of 

life loss, extensive downstream damage, 

functional loss of the project, and the 

loss of all project benefits. The nature 

and extent of the remediation 

alternatives will be determined based on 

the results of on-going engineering 

studies, public and agency input during 

the scoping period, and preparation of 

the draft EIS. 

3. Issues To Be Addressed. The draft 

EIS will address environmental issues 

concerning the remediation alternatives 

proposed. Issues will be identified 

based on public input during the 

scoping process and during preparation 

of the draft EIS. Environmental issues 

initially identified as potentially 

significant include, but are not limited 

to: hydrology and water quality, noise 

and vibration, air quality, 

socioeconomics, water supply, land use, 

recreation, visual and aesthetic 

resources, traffic and transportation, 

historical and cultural resources, 

vegetation and wildlife, special status 

species, and fisheries. 

4. Public Involvement. Public scoping 

meetings will be held in 2014 at specific 

locations to be announced within the 

local Cherry Creek Dam project area. 

The purpose of the public scoping 

meetings will be to present information 

to the public regarding the array of 

remediation alternatives that may be 

addressed in the draft EIS, receive 

public comments, and solicit input 

regarding dam safety issues, 

remediation alternatives to consider, 

and environmental issues of concern to 

the public. These meetings are intended 

to initiate the process to involve 

concerned individuals, and local, state, 

and federal agencies. The public 

scoping meeting place, date, and time 

will be advertised in advance in local 

newspapers, and meeting 

announcement letters will be sent to 

interested parties. 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES