alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1
**CERTIFICATION**
I, William C. Griffiths, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of ChampionEnterprises, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have;
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date:August 4, 2004 /s/ WILLIAM C. GRIFFITHS   William C. Griffiths President & Chief Executive Officer
Argued and submitted October 25,

affirmed November 24, 1999

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of George B. Hueth, Claimant. George B. HUETH, *Petitioner*, *v.*FORT JAMES CORP., *Respondent.*

(98-04521; CA A105435)

991 P2d 1067

Robert Pardington argued the cause for petitioner. On the brief were Nicholas M. Sencer and Pozzi Wilson Atchison, LLP.

Jerald P. Keene argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Linder and Brewer, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed. *Wantowski v. Crown Cork & Seal,*164 Or App 214, 991 P2d 574 (1999).
### Evaluation and control of corrosion and encrustation in tube wells of the Indus Plains, West Pakistan

By: Frank Eldridge ClarkeIvan Barnes

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1608L

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Preliminary evaluation of corrosion and encrustation mechanisms in tube wells of the Indus Plains, West Pakistan(1964)                                    

                                        Evaluation and control of corrosion and encrustation in tube wells of the Indus Plain, West Pakistan(1967)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,I, Gordon Ellis, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:1. To my knowledge, this report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2. To my knowledge, the information in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of International Absorbents Inc. as of July 31, 2007.     Date: September 11, 2007 /s/ GORDON ELLIS Gordon Ellis    *President and Chief Executive Officer*
#### § 203.33 Drug sample forms.

A sample request or receipt form may be delivered by mail, common carrier, or private courier or may be transmitted photographically or electronically (*i.e.*, by telephoto, wirephoto, radiophoto, facsimile transmission (FAX), xerography, or electronic data transfer) or by any other system, provided that the method for transmission meets the security requirements set forth in § 203.60(c).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>          THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL
                  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
                  COMPANY'S UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                  AS OF AND FOR THE PERIOD ENDING JULY 4,
                  1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY 
                  REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
<MULTIPLIER>      1,000
               
<S>                                          <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-2-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-4-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       6-MOS

<CASH>                                             21,435
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      95,196
<ALLOWANCES>                                          493
<INVENTORY>                                       204,877
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  375,887
<PP&E>                                            238,485
<DEPRECIATION>                                     67,145
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    934,274
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             519,066
<BONDS>                                             3,552
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                           47,996
<OTHER-SE>                                        301,115
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      934,274
<SALES>                                         1,045,525
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                1,045,525
<CGS>                                             866,906
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     866,906
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  5,477
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    72,347
<INCOME-TAX>                                       28,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                43,447
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                       43,447
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0.92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0.88


</TABLE>
Office for Domestic Preparedness 

U.S. Department of Homeland Security 

Washington, DC 20531

ODP Information Bulletin 

No. 176 June 13, 2005 

TO: Captains of the Port (COTP) 

 MARAD Regional Directors 

 SAAs, SAA POCs 

 

FROM: Matt A. Mayer 

 Acting Executive Director 

SUBJECT: FY 2005 Port Security Grant Program – Application Submission Naming 

Conventions 

The Office of State and Local Government Coordination and Preparedness (SLGCP) has 

received a number of applications for the FY05 Port Security Grant (PSG) Program that 

have not used the required document naming conventions for the program narrative, 

project plan(s), and project budget(s) files. As a result, SLGCP is issuing this bulletin to 

emphasize the required naming conventions that applicants must use when submitting 

documents to the Grants Management System (GMS) for the FY05 PSG Program.

On Section IV (page 12), and again in Appendix A (page D-1), of the FY05 PSG Program 

application kit, it is stated that: “Applicants must use the naming convention below 

when uploading the program narrative, project plans, and budgets. Refer to Appendix 

D for the appropriate abbreviations for the COTP Zones. 

COTP Zone_Port Area_Name of Applicant_Document Type_Project Number 

Example #1 – PWS_Valdez_State Ferry System_Program Narrative 

Example #2 – PWS_Valdez_State Ferry System_Project Plan_Project 1 

Example #3 – PWS_Valdez_State Ferry Syste_Project Budget_Project 1” 

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

For additional information concerning eligibility and grant guidelines, please refer to 

the PSG Program application kit at http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/fundopps.htm. To view 

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), please visit 
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/odp/grant_programs.htm and click on the FY 2005 Port 

Security Grant Program link. 

Questions related to this grant program may be directed to portsecuritygrants@dhs.gov

or the SLGCP Centralized Scheduling and Information Desk at askcsid@dhs.gov, 1-800-

368-6498.
### Special sediment investigations Mississippi River at St. Louis, Missouri, 1961-63

By: Cloyd H. ScottHoward D. Stephens

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1819J

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Sequa Corporation


Exhibit 10.3




Sequa Corporation




200 Park Avenue

New York,  NY  10166

212-956-5500










May 10, 2006










Mr. Martin Weinstein

20 West 64th Street, #32D

New York,   NY   10023




Re:

Employment Agreement Extension




Dear Marty:




Reference is hereby made to that certain Employment Agreement dated as of May 31, 2005 by and between Sequa Corporation and you (the “Employment Agreement”).  Terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Employment Agreement. 




This letter shall confirm that the Employment Term as set forth in Section 3 of the Employment Agreement shall be extended for an additional two (2) years from and after May 31, 2006 through May 31, 2008.




All other terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and are hereby ratified by Executive and Company.  




If the foregoing confirms your agreement and understanding, please so indicate by signing in the space provided below and returning one (1) original of this letter to me. 










Very truly yours,




Sequa Corporation




/s/ Norman E. Alexander

Norman E. Alexander

Executive Chairman




Acknowledged and Agreed 

this   15         day of    May   , 2006




	
	/s/ Martin Weinstein




Martin Weinstein
#### § 1210.30 Hearing procedure for permit denial, suspension, and revocation.

Any person who contests denial, suspension, or revocation of a permit shall have an opportunity for a regulatory hearing before the Food and Drug Administration pursuant to subpart F of part 16 of this chapter.

[41 FR 48269, Nov. 2, 1976, as amended at 42 FR 15676, Mar. 22, 1977]
FACT SHEET

CTAC

COMMERCIALTARGETING 

AND ANALYSIS CENTER

ESTABLISHED

 December 2009

LOCATION

 U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Office of Trade

Washington, DC

MISSION

 To facilitate information sharing and leverage the collective resources of 

participating government agencies to prevent, preempt, deter and 

investigate violations of importation laws that affect U.S. interest in the 

import safety environment

OBJECTIVE

 Create a multi-agency fusion center that develops, implements and 

streamlines joint targeting procedures to enhance federal targeting 

efforts on shipments posing a threat to the health and safety of the 

American public

CORE PRINCIPLES

 The center functionsto:

 Enhance information sharing

 Increase automation

 Expand interagency partnerships

PARTICIPATING AGENCIES

 Animal Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS)

 U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC)

 U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)

 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

 Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS)

 Food Safety and Inspection Services (FSIS)

 U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)

 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)

 National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS)

 Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA)

Visit the CTAC website at www.ctac.gov

CTAC@cbp.dhs.gov more information

CBP Publication No. 0513-0516
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         644,430
<SECURITIES>                                    87,059
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      10,138,063
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,794,821
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,490,799
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          885,022
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,580,777
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,490,799
<SALES>                                      1,140,939
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,140,939
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,062,837
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             252,227
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (174,125)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (174,125)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Cycle of Warning: Public Response

A NATIONAL NEED

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Science 

and Technology Directorate (S&T) released a Report on 

Alerting Tactics and outlined recommendations of 

effective combinations of alerting tactics for various 

incident types. These recommendations were based 

upon lessons learned from public safety, alert originator, 

and academic practitioners that resulted in identifying the 

need for national level Alerts, Warnings, and Notifications 

(AWN) guidance. In order to address this stakeholderdriven requirement, a DHS S&T AWN Working Group 

was convened that comprised of a nationwide group of 

alerting subject matter experts (SMEs) to advise the 

development of the AWN Guidance Materials. The 

alerting SMEs met monthly for seven months to develop 

the Cycle of Warning: Public Response graphic and 

supporting text.

THE CYCLE OF WARNING: PUBLIC 

RESPONSE 

The purpose of the Cycles of Warning: Public Response 

is to outline the full ecosystem of an AWN from the 

perspectives of the public to help reduce the amount of 

time that people delay taking a protective action. The 

cycle graphic and supporting text provide simple, easy to 

understand, step-by-step details of what happens when 

an incident occurs, AWN are sent to the public, and the 

resulting actions from the public. The cycle begins with 

Citizen Education and Awareness (in blue) before an 

incident begins. The Public Loop (in green) details the 

steps the public takes once they have received an AWN. 

The outside circles (in plum) show additional information 

about what the public is doing during each step. The 

cycle ends when the incident ends and follow-up 

information is sent. It is recommended that these 

educational materials are used to help alert originators 

better understand, enhance, and streamline AWN 

operations now and in the future.

Please note, steps in the cycle can happen concurrently or multiple times throughout the alert origination process.

Contact Us: SandT.Innovation@hq.dhs.gov scitech.dhs.gov dhsscitech

01-2020
§ 1271.45 What requirements does this subpart contain? ( a ) *General.* This subpart sets out requirements for determining donor eligibility, including donor screening and testing. The requirements contained in this subpart are a component of current good tissue practice (CGTP) requirements. Other CGTP requirements are set out in subpart D of this part.
( b ) *Donor-eligibility determination required.* A donor-eligibility determination, based on donor screening and testing for relevant communicable disease agents and diseases, is required for all donors of cells or tissue used in HCT/Ps, except as provided under § 1271.90. In the case of an embryo or of cells derived from an embryo, a donor-eligibility determination is required for both the oocyte donor and the semen donor.
( c ) *Prohibition on use.* An HCT/P must not be implanted, transplanted, infused, or transferred until the donor has been determined to be eligible, except as provided under §§ 1271.60(d), 1271.65(b), and 1271.90 of this subpart.
( d ) *Applicability of requirements.* If you are an establishment that performs any function described in this subpart, you must comply with the requirements contained in this subpart that are applicable to that function.
[69 FR 29830, May 25, 2004, as amended at 69 FR 68681, Nov. 24, 2004]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE UNAUDITED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          58,401
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  768,243
<ALLOWANCES>                                    78,352
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,288,752
<PP&E>                                       2,230,033
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,624,184
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,837,842
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,659,029
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        32,163
<OTHER-SE>                                     815,106
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,595,461
<SALES>                                        484,186
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,718,657
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  792,985
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,705,688
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              73,183
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                187,324
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            187,324
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   187,324
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
        

</TABLE>