alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 7 (Tuesday, January 12, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 1681]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-366]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Research and Innovative Technology Administration


University Transportation Centers (UTC) Program Grants (49 U.S.C. 
5506); Suspension of Competitions

AGENCY: Research and Innovative Technology Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Transportation is providing notice that 
it intends to suspend competitions for its University Transportation 
Centers (UTC) Program grants (49 USC 5506) pending the enactment of 
multi-year, surface transportation authorization legislation that is 
necessary to define the purpose, eligibility, number, and funding 
amounts of any future grants.

DATES: Dates for future UTC competitions are not known at this time. As 
more information is available about future grant competitions, it will 
be posted on the UTC Program's Web site, http://utc.dot.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Curtis Tompkins, University 
Transportation Centers Program, Office of Research, Development and 
Technology, RDT-30, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, 
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. Telephone Number 
(202) 366-2125, Fax Number (202) 493-2993 or E-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#096a7c7b7d607a277d6664796260677a496d667d276e667f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5d3e282f29342e732932302d3634332e1d393229733a322b">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity 
Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU, Pub. L. 109-59, as amended by Pub. 
L. 110-244) requires the Research and Innovative Technology 
Administration (RITA) of the U.S. Department of Transportation (U.S. 
DOT) to complete competitions for Regional UTCs by March 31, 2010, and 
for Tier I UTCs by June 30, 2010. Because there is no surface 
transportation authorization legislation or other authorizing vehicle 
yet in place to state the structure and funding of the UTC Program 
beyond Federal Fiscal Year 2009, and because of the burden that would 
be placed on applicants to pursue a competition process that has a high 
likelihood of being voided should a multi-year, surface transportation 
authorization substantially change the terms and conditions of the UTC 
Program and grants to be issued under that program, the Research and 
Innovative Technology Administration is suspending these competitions 
until such time as a multi-year surface transportation authorization 
has been enacted.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on December 18, 2009.
Peter H. Appel,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2010-366 Filed 1-11-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-HY-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
OSLDPS INFORMATION BULLETIN

No. 36 June 12, 2001

TO: All State Agency Heads

All State Agency Points of Contact

FROM: C.H. “Butch” Straub II

Director

SUBJECT: First Responder Equipment Purchase Program, Marine Corps Systems Command

I am pleased to take this opportunity to provide OSLDPS equipment grant recipients with

information about the First Responder Equipment Purchase Program, Marine Corps Systems

Command (MCSC). Please find enclosed detailed information regarding procurement procedures

and contact listings for this important program. This joint effort between the Office for State and

Local Domestic Preparedness Support (OSLDPS) and MCSC provides an alternative method of

equipment procurement for OSLDPS grantees. Through this program, State, county, and

municipal grant recipients can procure basic defensive equipment for first responders through

MCSC prime vendors, potentially saving valuable time and money compared to typical

procurement methods. We highly encourage all grantees to review the enclosed material and

contact an MCSC representative to discuss the numerous benefits of this program.
§ 207.37 What restrictions pertain to the use of the NDC? ( a ) A product may be deemed to be misbranded if an NDC is used: ( 1 ) To represent a different drug than the drug for which the NDC has been assigned, as described in § 207.33;
( 2 ) To denote or imply FDA approval of a drug; or
( 3 ) On products that are not subject to parts 207, 607 of this chapter, or 1271 of this chapter, such as dietary supplements and medical devices.
( b ) If marketing is resumed for a discontinued drug, and no changes have been made to the drug that would require a new NDC under § 207.35, the drug must have the same NDC that was assigned to it as described in § 207.33, before marketing was discontinued.
###### Editorial Note on Part 170

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 170 appear at 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001, and 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004.

#### § 170.205 Opportunity to submit a GRAS notice.

Any person may notify FDA of a view that a substance is not subject to the premarket approval requirements of section 409 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act based on that person's conclusion that the substance is GRAS under the conditions of its intended use.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Inherited Disease Research Access Committee.                    

*Date:*                         March 12, 2010.                    

*Time:*                         2 p.m. to 3 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 4076, Bethesda, MD 20852. (Telephone Conference Call)                    

*Contact Person:*                         Ken D. Nakamura, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 4076, MSC 9306, Rockville, MD 20852, 301-402-0838.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.172, Human Genome Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 18, 2010.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-3914 Filed 2-25-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit 23.2



















                          INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement (File No. 333-12247) of Level 8
Systems, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated January 31,
1997, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Level
8 Systems, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1996.




                               LURIE, BESIKOF, LAPIDUS & CO., LLP


Minneapolis, Minnesota

March 13, 1997







                          INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT


Board of Directors and Shareholders
Level 8 Systems, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets
of LEVEL 8 SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES (former Across
Data Systems, Inc.) as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and
the related consolidated statements of operations, changes
in shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 1996.  Our
audits also included the financial statement schedule listed
in the Index at Item 14(b)2.  These financial statements and
financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the
Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements and financial
statement schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally
accepted auditing standards.  Those standards require that
we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance
about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements.  An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide
a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements
referred to above present fairly, in all material respects,
the consolidated financial position of LEVEL 8 SYSTEMS, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the
results of their operations and their cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 1996, in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. 
Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule,
when considered in relation to the basic financial
statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material
respects the information set forth therein.



                               LURIE, BESIKOF, LAPIDUS & CO., LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota

January 31, 1997
01-30-2013

To; U.S. Department of Transportation

 Docket Operations, M-30

 West Building ground floor,

 Room W12-140

 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

 Washington, DC 20590

To whom it may concern,

Paradigm Helicopters LLC is writing this letter to request an extension to Exemption No. 10275 from 14 

CFR Part 120, Docket No. FAA-2011-0537, which is scheduled to expire 06-30-2013.

Justification for this renewal request remains the same as the original request dated May 31, 2011.

Your help on this matter is greatly appreciated. Please do not hesitate to contact me if I may be of any 

assistance.

Regards,

Richard R. Jones

Chief Pilot, Paradigm Helicopters LLC

11811 N Brantly, Suite 206A

Houston, TX 77034-5599

877-345-8687

rick@paradigmhelicopters.com
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                      $1,231,291
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            $1,252,041
<PP&E>                                     $22,324,205
<DEPRECIATION>                              $6,627,293
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             $17,208,666
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         $338,288
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   ($948,739)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               $17,208,666
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            $1,858,066
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               $1,059,888
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                $8,816
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            $685,432
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               $103,930
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           $103,930
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  $103,930
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   $10.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   $10.50
        

</TABLE>
[No. 21199-8-II.

Division Two.

November 14, 1997.]

#### *In the Matter of the Welfare*of R.C., et al.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 96-7-00024-1, Karen L. Strombom, J., entered September 11, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Houghton, C.J., concurred in by Seinfeld and Armstrong, JJ.
#### ULYSSES GRANT FREELAND, PROSECUTOR, v. THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF EAST RUTHERFORD, RESPONDENTS.

Submitted January 17, 1939

Decided March 2, 1939.

*185Before Justices Case, Donges and Poster.

For the prosecutor, *C. Conrad Schneider.*

For the respondents, *Dominick Marconi (R. Louis Clarkson,*of counsel).

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.

The prosecutor, an exempt fireman, was employed by the respondents as a driver of a truck, and was discharged from that employment. He sues out this writ of *certiorari*to test the legality of his discharge. The facts are stipulated.

It appears that the prosecutor was appointed driver of one of the trucks of the borough by resolution of the mayor and council on January 18th, 1937. On March 21st, 1938, the council by motion dispensed with the services of the prosecutor and another driver, employed in the Department of Public Works, named Prank Perraro. It took this action in pursuance with a written report to the mayor and council of the chairman of the Department of Public Works to the effect that the funds budgeted would he insufficient to carry on the road work and that it was necessary to curtail the expenses for the balance of the year. This report stated, in part: “The drain of the salaries of Grant Preeland (prosecutor), Prank Perraro and the superintendent of the department for the three-month period has been more than the budget appropriation can stand. The superintendent of these departments is now well enough to perform his duties in full and is now doing so. Therefore, the services of both Grant Proeland and Prank Perraro are to be terminated as of April 1st, 1938, they being the last two members to he placed on said department. A rearrangement of the working schedule' is being worked out by the committee in charge of these departments and the necessary work will be carried on as economically as possible, the committee contemplating using relief workers when emergencies arise and where possible.”

It further appears that subsequently Perraro has been re-employed as driver on part time together with other men, *186all of wliom were presumably unemployed; at any rate they were on the relief list of the borough and were given this employment for at least three days a week because they were receiving money from the borough “for relief” and in payment for the money so received.

Under the facts and circumstances of this case we conclude that the prosecutor has not shown that the municipality was actuated by political considerations or bad faith, rather than reasons of economy, in the conduct of its affairs as it claims.

The writ will be dismissed, without costs.
From: Meehan, Clair

Subject: Water Quality Standards Regulatory Clarifications Proposed Rule - October 29 meeting follow-up

Date: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 2:29:00 PM

Attachments: WQS Webinar 2013 10 23_Final Clean Public Meeting.pdf

Thank you for your interest in EPA’s October 29 public meeting on the Water Quality

Standards Regulatory Clarifications Proposed Rule. Attached, please find a copy of the

slides shared.

HOW TO SUBMIT COMMENTS ON THE RULEMAKING

Written comments must be received by the last day of the comment period, December

3, 2013.

If you wish to submit a comment on the proposed rule, your comment must be

directed to the associated docket (Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-2010-0606) by one of

the following methods:

· Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online

instructions for submitting comments.

· Email: ow-docket@epa.gov.

· Mail: Water Docket, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 2822T, 1200

Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460. Attention: Docket ID No. EPA–

HQ–OW–2010–0606.

· Hand Delivery: EPA Docket Center, EPA West Room 3334, 1301 Constitution

Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20004, Attention: Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OW–2010–

0606. Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket Center’s normal

hours of operation. Special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed

information by calling 202–566–2426.

FOR MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THE RULEMAKING

More information about the proposed rulemaking is available on EPA’s website at:

http://water.epa.gov/lawsregs/lawsguidance/wqs_index.cfm.

For more information about submitting your public comments, please refer to the

notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register

(http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-04/pdf/2013-21140.pdf).

QUESTIONS?

For more information about the public meeting or webinars, please contact: Ms. Janita

Aguirre, US EPA, at 202.566.1149 or aguirre.janita@epa.gov. If you have additional

clarifying questions about the proposed rule, please contact US EPA at the phone and

email address dedicated to this rulemaking: 202-566-1860 or

WQSRegulatoryClarifications@epa.gov.
Clair Meehan | Environmental Scientist

clair.meehan@tetratech.com

Tetra Tech | Complex World, Clear Solutions

www.tetratech.com

PLEASE NOTE: This message, including any attachments, may include privileged, confidential and/or inside information.

Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be

unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by replying to this message and then delete it from

your system.

P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
[No. 37359-5-I.

Division One.

June 16, 1997.]

#### Bhupinder K. Gomar, *Appellant,*v. Charanjit Singh, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 94-3-01355-0, James D. McCutcheon, J., entered August 28, 1995. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
FLORIDA SUPREME COURT

NOTICE OF CORRECTION

DATE: April 2, 2020

CASE OF: IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF JUDICIAL 

ADMINISTRATION, THE FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL 

PROCEDURE, AND THE FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL 

PROCEDURE—STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS

DOCKET NO.: SC20-145 OPINION FILED: March 5, 2020

ATTENTION: ALL PUBLISHERS

THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE IN THE ABOVE 

OPINION:

On p. 1, line 6, “2.570” has been changed to “2.580.”

On p. 10, line 5, “2.570” has been changed to “2.580.”

On p. 11, lines 1 and 4 of the last paragraph, “2.570” has been changed to “2.580.”

On p. 12, lines 8 and 12, “2.570” have been changed to “2.580.”

On p. 13, lines 5, 7, 9, and 13, “2.570” have been changed to “2.580.”

On p. 15, line 4 of Rule 1.470(b), “2.570” has been changed to “2.580.”

On p. 18, line 2 of Rule 2.270(b)(4), “2.570” has been changed to “2.580.”

On p. 18, last heading, “RULE 2.570” has been changed to “RULE 2.580.”

On p. 19, line 3 of Rule 3.390(a), “2.570” has been changed to “2.580.”

SIGNED: OPINION CLERK
[No. 15315-1-III.

Division Three.

January 6, 1998.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. John W. E. Ellis, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Chelan County, No. 93-1-00489-4, John E. Bridges, J., entered November 17, 1995. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Brown, J., concurred in by Kurtz, A.C.J., and Kato, J.
| **Scientific Investigations Map2850** |
|----------------------------------------|

| Surficial Geologic Map of the Tanacross B-6 Quadrangle, East-Central Alaska |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|

By Paul E. Carrara**Version 1.0***Published 2004*The text of this report is presented here in Portable Document Format.      The latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader® or similar software is      required to view it. If you wish to download the latest version of Acrobat      Reader® free of charge, click here. SIM 2850 PDF        file (1.76 MB)For printing and viewing
Text Only PDF file (48 KB)
(This version of the report is accessible as defined in Section 508.)Readme TXT file (2 KB) SIM 2850 MET file (17 KB)Metadata file
 
2850.zip (2 MB)ZIPPED archive of ArcInfo and ArcView files2850.tar.gz (2 MB)TARRED and GZIPPED archive of ArcInfo and ArcView filesAccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices
U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey      URL: https://pubsdata.usgs.gov/pubs/sim/2004/2850/Questions or Assistance: USGS Web ContactPage Last Modified: Thr Dec  1 17:04 EDT 2016