alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS AT DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND THE AUDITED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE 12 MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 TOGETHER
WITH ALL NOTES THERETO AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       1,639,567
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,911,660
<ALLOWANCES>                                   153,057
<INVENTORY>                                  1,938,819
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,147,939
<PP&E>                                       4,660,904
<DEPRECIATION>                                 665,193
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,215,422
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,878,738
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,495,319
<COMMON>                                        15,531
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,907,627
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,215,422
<SALES>                                     11,314,141
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,314,141
<CGS>                                        9,136,286
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,136,286
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,352,003
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 9,827
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,223
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,194,487)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   101,432
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,295,919)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,295,919)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.20)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF INTIMATE BRANDS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES FOR
THE YEAR ENDED FEBRUARY 1, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-04-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-01-1997
<CASH>                                         135,111
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,750
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    434,800
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               656,976
<PP&E>                                         701,599
<DEPRECIATION>                                 305,952
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,135,162
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          323,681
<BONDS>                                        350,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,527
<OTHER-SE>                                     399,526
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,135,162
<SALES>                                      2,997,340
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,997,340
<CGS>                                        1,942,295
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,942,295
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               584,903
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,544
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                430,210
<INCOME-TAX>                                   172,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            258,210
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   258,210
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.02
        

</TABLE>
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 39946

STATE OF IDAHO ,
Plaintiff-Respondent ,

v.

DEBBY RAE JOHNSON ,
Defendant-Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2013 Unpublished Opinion No. 563

Filed: July 2, 2013

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN U NPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Third Judicial District, State of Idaho, Gem County. Hon. Juneal C. Kerrick , District Judge.

Order denying I.C.R. 35 motion for reduction of sentence, affirmed

.
Sara B. Thomas, S tate Appellate Public Defender; Sarah E. Tompkins, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________ GUITIERREZ, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge; and GRATTON, Judge

PER C URIAM
Debby Rae Johnson was convicted of one count of possession or delivery of a controlled
substance while in jail , Idaho Code § 18

- 2511 . The district court withheld judgment and placed
Johnson on probation for three years. Su bsequently, Johnson admitted to violating her probation
and the district court revoked probation and executed a five

- year sentence with two and one

- half
years determinate

. Johnson filed an Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motion, which the district court

denied. Johnson appeals from the denial of her Rule 35 motion.
A Rule 35 motion is a request for leniency which is addressed to the sound discretion of
the sentencing court. State v. Knighton , 143 Idaho 318, 319, 144 P.3d 23, 24 (2006); State v.

Allbee , 115 Idaho 84 5, 846, 771 P.2d 66, 67 (Ct. App. 1989). In presenting a Rule 35 motion,2 the defendant must show that the sentence is excessive in light of new or additional information
subsequently provided to the district court in support of the motion. State v. Huffm an , 144 Idaho
201, 159 P.3d 838 (2007). Our focus on review is upon the nature of the offense and the

character of the offender. State v. Reinke , 103 Idaho 771, 772, 653 P.2d 1183, 1184 (Ct. App.
1982). Where a sentence is not illegal, the appellant mus t show that it is unreasonably harsh in
light of the primary objective of protecting society and the related goals of deterrence,

rehabilitation and retribution. State v. Broadhead , 120 Idaho 141, 145, 814 P.2d 401, 405
(1991), overruled on other grounds by State v. Brown , 121 Idaho 385, 825 P.2d 482 (1992);

State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982).
Having reviewed the record, including any new information submitted with Johnson ’s

Rule 35 motion, we find no abuse of discretion in the district court’s denial of the motion.
Accordingly, the district court’s order denying Johnson ’s I.C.R. 35 motion is affirmed.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

Y.R., a child,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-318

[March 22, 2023]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Cymonie S. Rowe, Judge; L.T. Case No. 21CJ000106AMB.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Logan T. Mohs, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Pablo Tapia, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See § 90.704, Fla. Stat. (2021) (“The facts or data upon which 

an expert bases an opinion or inference may be those perceived by, or 

made known to, the expert at or before the trial. If the facts or data are of 

a type reasonably relied upon by experts in the subject to support the 

opinion expressed, the facts or data need not be admissible in evidence.

Facts or data that are otherwise inadmissible may not be disclosed to the 

[factfinder] by the proponent of the opinion or inference unless the court 

determines that their probative value in assisting the [factfinder] to 

evaluate the expert’s opinion substantially outweighs their prejudicial 

effect.”).

WARNER, GERBER and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 23.2











CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 Board of Directors,
 IAS Energy, Inc.
 
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 of IAS Energy, Inc., of our report dated August 11, 2008, on the consolidated balance sheet of IAS Energy Inc. as of April 30, 2008 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows for the year
ended April 30, 2008, included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2009.
 
 
 
 “Smythe Ratcliffe LLP” (Signed)
 
 
 
 Chartered Accountants
 Vancouver, Canada
 
 September 11, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                          3,784
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,784
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,307
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,210
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    182
<INCOME-TAX>                                        20
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                162
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       162
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.1(b)


             Schedule of Secured Convertible Note (demand) Issued by
               NCT Group, Inc. to Carole Salkind on July 31, 2006



    Issue Date       Due Date           Principal         Conversion Price
    ----------       --------           ---------         ----------------
     07/31/06        Earlier of:        $550,000       Greater of:  (i) $0.0019;
                     (i) demand;                       or (ii) the par value of
                     or (ii) 01/31/07                  NCT Group, Inc.
                                                       common stock on the
                                                       date of conversion
THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

*********************************************

TO THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO 2 OF SMITH COUNTY, GREETING:

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 15th

day of April, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

MICHAEL ANGEL GARZA, Appellant

NO. 12-14-00051-CR; Trial Court No. 002-81506-12

By per curiam opinion.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

“THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record and briefs filed herein, and the 

same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that there was no error in the judgment.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the judgment of the court 

below be in all things affirmed, and that this decision be certified to the court below for 

observance.”

WHEREAS, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals 

for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly 

recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN, Chief Justice of our Court 

of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of 

Tyler, this the 9

th day of June, 2015.

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

By: _______________________________

Chief Deputy Clerk
THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

*********************************************

TO THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO 2 OF SMITH COUNTY, GREETING:

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 15th

day of April, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

MICHAEL ANGEL GARZA, Appellant

NO. 12-14-00052-CR; Trial Court No. 002-83977-12

By per curiam opinion.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

“THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record and briefs filed herein, and the 

same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that there was no error in the judgment.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the judgment of the court 

below be in all things affirmed, and that this decision be certified to the court below for 

observance.”

WHEREAS, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals 

for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly 

recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN, Chief Justice of our Court 

of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of 

Tyler, this the 9

th day of June, 2015.

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

By: _______________________________

Chief Deputy Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED MARCH
31, 1999 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          59,453
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  611,676
<ALLOWANCES>                                    52,010
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               689,574
<PP&E>                                       1,996,447
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,624,597
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,692,117
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,083,427
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        31,946
<OTHER-SE>                                     572,435
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,692,117
<SALES>                                      1,793,526
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,401,564
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  941,857
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,780,698
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              57,010
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (366,011)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (366,011)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (366,011)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.12)


</TABLE>
Exhibit








Exhibit 4.5.6


THIS AMENDMENT AGREEMENT is made on the 6th day of September 2016 


BETWEEN


		
	(1)
	Seaport Canaveral, Corp (the Company)




AND


		
	(2)
	Vitol Inc. (the Client)






WITNESSETH:


WHEREAS:


		
	(A)
	The Company and the Client are parties to a Terminalling Services Contract originally dated 1 February 2010 (the Contract) and later further amended to expire March 31, 2019, bearing contract reference number C100101, pursuant to which the Company is required to provide to the Client Terminalling services for various petroleum products at the Company’s terminal at Cape Canaveral, Florida, U.S.A.




		
	(B)
	For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Company and the Client now wish to amend the Contract in accordance with this Amendment Agreement.  




NOW THEREFORE it is agreed as follows:


		
	1.
	The Company and the Client agree that on the first of every month and effective January 1, 2017 Company will invoice Client a Truck Rack Access fee of $110,000 monthly through the duration of the existing contract (i.e. March 31, 2019).




		
	2.
	The Company agrees to execute and construct the “Rack Expansion Project” full scope as discussed during the June 1st meeting held at Seaport office and as referenced in Presentation: Rack Expansion Rev 01, “Six Lanes to Ten Lanes” (excluding slides 9 & 10) which is attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes (the Expansion). The Parties agree that time is of the essence in the construction and commencement of operations with respect to the Expansion. 




		
	3.
	Save to the extent amended by this Amendment Agreement, all other terms and conditions of the Contract shall remain in full force and effect. 




		
	4.
	Terms not otherwise defined in this Amendment Agreement have the same meaning as in the Contract.




		
	5.
	This Amendment Agreement shall be read and construed as if this Amendment 


Agreement and the Contract as amended constitute one agreement. 













IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Client and the Company have caused this Amendment Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives, as of the date first above written.






VTTI BV
SEAPORT CANAVERAL, CORP                VITOL INC.








/s/ J.P.C. Saaltink                    /s/ M. A. Loya
§ 26.75 Suspension of recognition obligations. Either party may suspend its obligations under subpart A or B of this part, in whole or in part, if: ( a ) A party suffers a loss of market access for the party's products within the scope of subpart A or B of this part as a result of the failure of the other party to fulfill its obligations under this part;
( b ) The adoption of new or additional conformity assessment requirements as referenced in § 26.73(e) results in a loss of market access for the party's products within the scope of subpart B of this part because conformity assessment bodies (CAB's) designated by the party in order to meet such requirements have not been recognized by the party implementing the requirements; or
( c ) The other party fails to maintain legal and regulatory authorities capable of implementing the provisions of this part.
§ 21.3 Definitions. As used in this part: ( a ) *Individual* means a natural living person who is a citizen of the United States or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence. Individual does not include sole proprietorships, partnerships, or corporations engaged in the production or distribution of products regulated by the Food and Drug Administration or with which the Food and Drug Administration has business dealings. Any such business enterprise that is identified by the name of one or more individuals is not an individual within the meaning of this part. Employees of regulated business enterprises are considered individuals. Accordingly, physicians and other health professionals who are engaged in business as proprietors of establishments regulated by the Food and Drug Administration are not considered individuals; however, physicians and other health professionals who are engaged in clinical investigations, employed by regulated enterprises, or the subjects of records concerning their own health, e.g., exposure to excessive radiation, are considered individuals. Food and Drug Administration employees, consultants, and advisory committee members, State and local officials, and consumers are considered individuals.
( b ) *Records about individuals* means items, collections, or groupings of information about individuals contained in Privacy Act Record Systems, including, but not limited to education, financial transactions, medical history, criminal history, or employment history, that contain names or personal identifiers.
( c ) *Privacy Act Record System* means a system of records about individuals under the control of the Food and Drug Administration from which information is retrieved by individual names or other personal identifiers. The term includes such a system of records whether subject to a notice published by the Food and Drug Administration, the Department, or another agency. Where records are retrieved only by personal identifiers other than individual names, a system of records is not a Privacy Act Record System if the Food and Drug Administration cannot, by reference to information under its control, or by reference to records of contractors that are subject to this part under § 21.30, ascertain the identity of individuals who are the subjects of the records.
( d ) *Personal identifiers* includes individual names, identifying numbers, symbols, or other identifying designations assigned to individuals. *Personal identifiers* does not include names, numbers, symbols, or other identifying designations that identify products, establishments, or actions.
( e ) *Personnel records* means any personal information maintained in a Privacy Act Record System that is needed for personnel management programs or processes such as staffing, employee development, retirement, and grievances and appeals.
( f ) *Department* means Department of Health and Human Services.