alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 182.60 Synthetic flavoring substances and adjuvants.

Synthetic flavoring substances and adjuvants that are generally recognized as safe for their intended use, within the meaning of section 409 of the Act, are as follows:

Acetaldehyde (ethanal).

Acetoin (acetyl methylcarbinol).

Anethole (parapropenyl anisole).

Benzaldehyde (benzoic aldehyde).

*N*-Butyric acid (butanoic acid).

*d*- or *l*-Carvone (carvol).

Cinnamaldehyde (cinnamic aldehyde).

Citral (2,6-dimethyloctadien-2,6-*al*-8, gera-nial, neral).

Decanal (*N*-decylaldehyde, capraldehyde, capric aldehyde, caprinaldehyde, aldehyde C-10).

Ethyl acetate.

Ethyl butyrate.

3-Methyl-3-phenyl glycidic acid ethyl ester (ethyl-methyl-phenyl-glycidate, so-called strawberry aldehyde, C-16 aldehyde).

Ethyl vanillin.

Geraniol (3,7-dimethyl-2,6 and 3,6-octadien-1-*ol*).

Geranyl acetate (geraniol acetate).

Limonene (*d-, l-,* and *dl-*).

Linalool (linalol, 3,7-dimethyl-1,6-octadien-3-*ol*).

Linalyl acetate (bergamol).

Methyl anthranilate (methyl-2-aminobenzoate).

Piperonal (3,4-methylenedioxy-benzaldehyde, heliotropin).

Vanillin.

[42 FR 14640, Mar. 15, 1977, as amended at 43 FR 47724, Oct. 17, 1978; 44 FR 3963, Jan. 19, 1979; 44 FR 20656, Apr. 6, 1979; 48 FR 51907, Nov. 15, 1983; 54 FR 7402, Feb. 21, 1989]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      36,248,000
<SECURITIES>                               188,830,000
<RECEIVABLES>                            1,111,865,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      37,769,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,906,070,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       175,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 334,766,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,906,070,000
<SALES>                                    267,948,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           629,752,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              518,110,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          36,653,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             74,989,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                28,431,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                46,558,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.89
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.70


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7236 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7236

   To amend the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2017 to extend the 
   availability of identity protection coverage to individuals whose 
personally identifiable information was compromised during recent data 
         breaches at Federal agencies, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 5, 2024

Ms. Norton (for herself and Mr. Ruppersberger) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                             Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2017 to extend the 
   availability of identity protection coverage to individuals whose 
personally identifiable information was compromised during recent data 
         breaches at Federal agencies, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reducing the Effects of the 
Cyberattack on OPM Victims Emergency Response Act of 2024'' or the 
``RECOVER Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. IDENTITY PROTECTION COVERAGE FOR INDIVIDUALS AFFECTED BY 
              FEDERAL AGENCY DATA BREACHES.

    Section 633(a) of title VI of division E of the Consolidated 
Appropriations Act, 2017 (Public Law 115-31), as amended by section 630 
of title VI of division D of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018 
(Public Law 115-141), is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(a) For fiscal years 2016 through 2026,'' 
        and inserting ``(a) In General.--For fiscal year 2016 and each 
        fiscal year thereafter,'';
            (2) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (1); and
            (3) by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following:
            ``(2) is effective for the remainder of the life of the 
        affected individual; and
            ``(3) includes not less than $5,000,000 in identity theft 
        insurance.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         547,806
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  560,962
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,025,793
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,184,376
<PP&E>                                         625,103
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,883,576
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          681,826
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        36,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,764,414
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,883,576
<SALES>                                      3,560,150
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,560,150
<CGS>                                        2,112,834
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  935,484
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              40,464
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                471,368
<INCOME-TAX>                                   184,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            287,368
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   287,368
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
        

</TABLE>
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsWear Trends of the HERMeS Thruster as a Function of Throttle PointA series of short-duration (200 h) wear tests were conducted with two Hall Effect Rocket with Magnetic Shielding (HERMeS) technology demonstration units. Front pole covers, cathode keeper, and discharge channel wear were characterized as a function of discharge voltage, magnetic field strength, and chamber pressure. No discharge channel erosion was observed. Inner pole cover erosion was shown to be a weak function of discharge voltage with most erosion occurring at the lowest value, 300 V. The Technology Demonstration Unit (TDU) 3 keeper electrode eroded with each operating condition, with high magnetic field yielding the greatest erosion rate. The TDU-1 keeper electrode exhibited net deposition suggesting its configuration is more consistent with meeting overall HERMeS service life requirements. Ratios of molybdenum to graphite erosion rates suggests, with high uncertainty, that the sputtering ions are originating downstream of the thruster exit plane, striking the surface with small angles of incidence.Document ID20190002254Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsWilliams, George J., Jr.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Kamhawi, Hani*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Choi, Maria*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Haag, Thomas W.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Huang, Wensheng*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Herman, Daniel A.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Gilland, James H.*(Ohio Aerospace Inst. Brook Park, OH, United States)*Peterson, Peter Y.*(Vantage Partners, LLC Brook Park, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredApril 10, 2019Publication DateApril 1, 2019Subject CategorySpacecraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-2019-219731IEPC?2017?207E-19456GRC-E-DAA-TN48801Meeting InformationMeeting: International Electric Propulsion ConferenceLocation: Atlanta, GACountry: United StatesStart Date: October 8, 2017End Date: October 12, 2017Sponsors:Electric Rocket Propulsion SocietyFunding Number(s)WBS: WBS 729200.06.03.05.01CONTRACT_GRANT: NNC12BA01BDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20190002254.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Maritime Commission
 Notice is hereby given that the following Ocean Transportation Intermediary license has been reissued by the Federal Maritime Commission pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. chapter 409) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR part 515. License No.
Name/Address
Date Reissued021037N
All West Coast Shipping Inc., dba West Coast Shipping, 1065 Broadway Avenue, San Pablo, CA 94806
November 7, 2010.
 Tanga S. FitzGibbon, Deputy Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.


[FR Doc. 2010-33352 Filed 1-4-11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS AT DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND THE AUDITED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE 12 MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 TOGETHER WITH
ALL NOTES THERETO AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,639,567
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,911,660
<ALLOWANCES>                                   153,057
<INVENTORY>                                  1,938,819
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,147,939
<PP&E>                                       4,660,904
<DEPRECIATION>                                 655,193
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,215,422
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,878,738
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,405,319
<COMMON>                                        15,581
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,907,627
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,215,422
<SALES>                                     11,314,141
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,314,141
<CGS>                                        9,136,286
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,136,286
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,357,003
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 9,827
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,223
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,194,487)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   101,432
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,295,919)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,295,919)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.20)
        

</TABLE>
----

|   | (1) | In connection with the Annual Report of the Company on form 10-K for the twelve month period ended May 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and Section 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company for the periods presented therein. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:                      | /s/ Gary J. Allen            |   |
|--------|--------------------------|------------------------------|--------|
|   |                     | Gary J. Allen                |   |
|   |                     | Senior Corporate Controller  |   |
|   |                     | Principal Accounting Officer |   |
|   |                     |                         |   |
|   | Date: September 14, 2010 |

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 21


                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

                           Year Ended August 31, 1999


     Wholly-owned subsidiaries of the registrant are:

          Penford Products Co.
            incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware

          Penford Export Corporation

     All subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial statements.



                                    Page 47
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 37 (Thursday, February 25, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 8719]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3810]

[[Page 8719]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. [thinsp]225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than March 12, 2010.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. Carol O'Leary, Medford, Wisconsin, as an individual; and Carol 
O'Leary, Medford, Wisconsin; Tristar Printing Co., Inc., Abbotsford, 
Wisconsin; Kevin S. Flink and Kristine M. O'Leary, both of Abbotsford, 
Wisconsin; and Willis R. Whetstone, Medford, Wisconsin, as a group 
acting in concert to retain control of Central Wisconsin 
Bancorporation, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire Community Bank of 
Central Wisconsin, both of Colby, Wisconsin.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Kenneth Binning, Vice 
President, Applications and Enforcement) 101 Market Street, San 
Francisco, California 94105-1579:
    1. Park Randal Roney, Mapleton, Utah, Blake Marshal Roney, Provo, 
Utah, Robert Tod Monsen, Mapleton, Utah, and Steven Jay Lund, of Provo, 
Utah; to acquire voting shares of Community Bancorporation, Pleasant 
Grove, Utah, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Western 
Community Bank, Orem, Utah.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 22, 
2010.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-3810 Filed 2-24-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
```
#### MICHIGAN UNITED RAILWAYS CO. *v.*INGHAM CIRCUIT JUDGE.

Pleadings — Rules—Demurrer—Time oe Filing.

Under Circuit Court Rule 10, subd. *a,*a demurrer to an amended declaration filed more than ten days after the filing of the amended declaration was properly stricken from the files.

Mandamus by the Michigan United Railways Company to compel Howard Wiest, circuit judge of Ingham county, to vacate an order striking a demurrer.

Submitted February 5, 1909.

(Calendar No. 23,2411⁄2.)

Application denied February 6, 1909.

*Sanford W. Ladd,*for relator.

Per Curiam.

On December 26,1907, Charles Daman, as administrator of the estate of Edward S. Daman, deceased, instituted a suit against relator and the city of Lansing to recover the pecuniary damages sustained by *479the death of said Edward, his son. The cause of action was based upon the concurrent negligence of the two defendants. January 10, 1908, the relator filed its individual plea of the general issue. On February 27, 1908, the city of Lansing filed a like plea. In June, 1908, the cause came on for trial; and, in view of the ruling of the respondent, at the close of the proofs that the city was not liable, and both counts of the declaration being founded on a concurrent liability, the relator could not be held alone, the plaintiff withdrew a juror, and submitted to a nonsuit. No formal order was made, and the case stood as though no trial had been had. July 27, 1908, an amended declaration was filed, including two new counts, alleging the individual liability of the relator alone and at the same time the respondent entered an order allowing such amendment. On the 29th day of December, 1908, relator filed its demurrer to the amended declaration. On January 25, 1909, plaintiff in said suit filed a motion to strike said demurrer from the files. February 8, 1909, respondent granted the motion. February 5, 1909, relator filed in this court his petition for an order to show cause why respondent’s order should not be vacated, and he be required to enter an order reinstating said demurrer. Respondent’s order was based upon Circuit Court Rule 10, subd. *a,*providing in part that:

> ‘ ‘ If such amendment is made after plea or demurrer, such plea or demurrer shall stand as the plea or demurrer to the amended declaration, unless the defendant shall, within ten days after receiving such amendment, file another plea or demurrer.”

The rule fully supports the conclusion of the circuit judge; and the application for the order is denied.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

VASSILY ANTHONY THOMPSON, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 20-30138 

D.C. No. 2:16-cr-00145-TOR-1 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Washington

Thomas O. Rice, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 15, 2022**

Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Vassily Anthony Thompson appeals from the district court’s orders denying 

his motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) and 

motion for reconsideration. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. 

Reviewing for abuse of discretion, see United States v. Aruda, 993 F.3d 797, 799 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

FEB 22 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 20-30138 

(9th Cir. 2021), we affirm.

Thompson contends that the district court erred by applying U.S.S.G. 

§ 1B1.13, and by finding that he presents an ongoing danger. The record shows, 

however, that the district court viewed § 1B1.13 as “guidance” and found that it 

had the discretion to consider reasons beyond those enumerated in the Guideline,

which comports with Aruda. See 993 F.3d at 801-02. Further, contrary to 

Thompson’s assertion, the record shows that the district court considered all of the 

arguments Thompson advanced in support of his motions. Finally, the court’s 

conclusion that Thompson’s release would pose a danger to the public was 

supported by Thompson’s behavior while on pre-trial release, as well as the court’s 

conclusion under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) that the sentence imposed was necessary “to

protect the public from defendant’s fraudulent conduct.” As the court explained,

the § 3553(a) sentencing factors continued to support that sentence in light of 

Thompson’s offense conduct and the needs to reflect the seriousness of the offense, 

promote respect for the law, provide just punishment, and afford adequate 

deterrence. The court did not abuse its discretion in denying relief. See United

States v. Keller, 2 F.4th 1278, 1284 (9th Cir. 2021); United States v. Robertson, 

895 F.3d 1206, 1213 (9th Cir. 2018) (district court abuses its discretion only if its 

decision is illogical, implausible, or not supported by the record).

AFFIRMED.