alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1309.32 Application forms; contents; signature. ( a ) Any person who is required to be registered pursuant to § 1309.21 and is not so registered, shall apply on DEA Form 510 using the secure application portal at *www.DEAdiversion.usdoj.gov .*
( b ) Any person who is registered pursuant to § 1309.21, shall apply for reregistration on DEA Form 510a using the secure application portal at *www.DEAdiversion.usdoj.gov .*
( c ) DEA Forms 510 and 510a may be obtained online at *www.DEAdiversion.usdoj.gov .* DEA will send renewal notifications via email to registrants approximately calendar 60 days prior to their registration expiration date. Registrants are responsible for keeping their email address current in the secure application portal on DEA's website throughout the duration of their registration. Only applications submitted online through the secure application portal on DEA's website will be accepted for processing.
( d ) Each application for registration must include the Administration Chemical Code Number, as set forth in § 1310.02 of this chapter, for each List I chemical to be manufactured, distributed, imported, or exported.
( e ) Registration shall not entitle a person to engage in any activity with any List I chemical not specified in his or her application.
( f ) Each application shall include all information called for in the form, unless the item is not applicable, in which case this fact shall be indicated.
( g ) Each application, attachment, or other document filed as part of an application, shall be signed by the applicant, if an individual; by a partner of the applicant, if a partnership; or by an officer of the applicant, if a corporation, corporate division, association, trust or other entity. An applicant may authorize one or more individuals, who would not otherwise be authorized to do so, to sign applications for the applicant by filing with the application or other document a power of attorney for each such individual. The power of attorney shall be signed by a person who is authorized to sign applications under this paragraph and shall contain the signature of the individual being authorized to sign the application or other document. The power of attorney shall be valid until revoked by the applicant.
[60 FR 32454, June 22, 1995, as amended at 75 FR 10680, Mar. 9, 2010; 81 FR 97021, Dec. 30, 2016; 87 FR 21023, Apr. 11, 2022]
Editorial Note on Part 184
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 184 appear at 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; and 81 FR 49897, July 29, 2016.

§ 184.1260 Copper gluconate. ( a ) Copper gluconate (cupric gluconate (CH2OH(CHOH)4COO)2Cu, CAS Reg. No. 527-09-3) is a substance that occurs as light blue to bluish-green, odorless crystals, or as a fine, light blue powder. It is prepared by the reaction of gluconic acid solutions with cupric oxide or basic cupric carbonate.
( b ) The ingredient meets the specifications of the Food Chemicals Codex, 3d Ed. (1981), p. 90, which is incorporated by reference. Copies are available from the National Academy Press, 2101 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. 20418, or available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .*
( c ) In accordance with § 184.1(b)(1), the ingredient is used in food with no limitation other than current good manufacturing practice. The affirmation of this ingredient as generally recognized as safe (GRAS) as a direct human food ingredient is based upon the following current good manufacturing practice conditions of use: ( 1 ) The ingredient is used as a nutrient supplement as defined in § 170.3(o)(20) of this chapter and as a synergist as defined in § 170.3(o)(31) of this chapter.
( 2 ) The ingredient is used in food at levels not to exceed current good manufacturing practice. Copper gluconate may be used in infant formula in accordance with section 412(g) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) or with regulations promulgated under section 412(a)(2) of the Act.
( d ) Prior sanctions for this ingredient different from the uses established in this section do not exist or have been waived.
[49 FR 24119, June 12, 1984]
Editorial Note on Part 184
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 184 appear at 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; and 81 FR 49897, July 29, 2016.

§ 184.1736 Sodium bicarbonate. ( a ) Sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3, CAS Reg. No. 144-55-8) is prepared by treating a sodium carbonate or a sodium carbonate and sodium bicarbonate solution with carbon dioxide. As carbon dioxide is absorbed, a suspension of sodium bicarbonate forms. The slurry is filtered, forming a cake which is washed and dried.
( b ) The ingredient meets the specifications of the Food Chemicals Codex, 3d Ed. (1981), p. 278, which is incorporated by reference. Copies are available from the National Academy Press, 2101 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20418, or available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .*
( c ) In accordance with § 184.1(b)(1), the ingredient is used in food with no limitation other than current good manufacturing practice.
( d ) Prior sanctions for this ingredient different from the uses established in this section do not exist or have been waived.
[48 FR 52442, Nov. 18, 1983]
PART II OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.   Legal Proceedings

         For  information  concerning the suit filed by Harris Trust and Savings
Bank (as  trustee  for  Ameritech  Pension  Trust)  and others  against  Salomon
Brothers Inc., and Salomon Brothers Realty Corporation, see the description that
appears in the second and third  paragraphs  under the  caption  Item 3.  "Legal
Proceedings" on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998. In October 1999,
plaintiffs  filed a petition for certiorari  with the U. S. Supreme  Court.  The
petition  seeks  review of the U.S.  Court of Appeals for the Seventh  Circuit's
decision  reversing the denial of  defendants'  motion for summary  judgment and
dismissing the sole remaining ERISA claim against the Company.

         For information  concerning a purported class action in Florida against
numerous  broker-dealers  including Salomon Smith Barney Inc.  ("SSB"),  see the
description that appears in the sixth paragraph under the caption Item 3. "Legal
Proceedings"  on Form 10-K for the year ending  December  31,  1998.  In October
1999, plaintiff filed a second amended complaint.

         In March 1999, a complaint  seeking in excess of $250 million was filed
by a hedge fund and its investment  advisor  against SSB in the Supreme Court of
the  State of New  York,  County of New York  (MKP  Master  Fund,  LDC et al. v.
Salomon Smith Barney Inc.).  Plaintiffs allege that, while acting as their prime
broker SSB breached its contracts with plaintiffs, converted plaintiffs' monies,
and engaged in tortious  conduct,  including  breaching its fiduciary duties. In
October  1999,  the Court  granted in part and  denied in part  SSB's  motion to
dismiss the complaint.  The court dismissed  plaintiffs' tort claims,  including
the breach of  fiduciary  duty  claims,  but allowed the breach of contract  and
conversion  claims to  stand.  The  Company  intends  to  contest  this  lawsuit
vigorously.


Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds - None

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities - None

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders - None

Item 5. Other Information - None

Item 6. (a) Exhibits - None

        (b) Reports on Form 8-K - None
INFANTS

COVERAGE TO CARE >>> Prevention

Put Your Health First

Get the preventive services that are right for you!

Take advantage of these and other services available at no cost to you 

under most health coverage.

Developmental screening 

Hearing and vision 

screening

Height and weight 

measurements

Iron supplements for 

some infants

Obesity screening and 

counseling

Oral health risk 

assessment 

Blood health screening

Lead screening for at-risk infants 

Phenylketonuria (PKU) 

screening

Immunization Vaccines:

• Diphtheria, Tetanus, Pertussis

• Haemophilus influenza type B

• Hepatitis A &B

• HPV

• Inactivated poliovirus

• Influenza (Flu Shot)

• Measles, Mumps, Rubella

• Meningococcal

• Pneumococcal

• Rotavirus

• Varicella (Chicken Pox) COST TIP

Most preventive services are covered 

at no cost. However, if you receive 

additional services, you may be billed. 

Ask your provider’s office or plan to 

explain any charges.

For additional resources and a full list of the preventive services covered at no cost sharing 

under most health plans, please visit go.cms.gov/c2c.

CMS Product No. 11966

September 2017
#### § 801.10 What does this part do?

This part adopts the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) guidance in subparts A through I of 2 CFR part 180, as supplemented by this part, as the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) policies and procedures for nonprocurement debarment and suspension. It thereby gives regulatory effect for the Department of Veterans Affairs to the OMB guidance as supplemented by this part. This part satisfies the requirements in section 3 of Executive Order 12549, “Debarment and Suspension” (3 CFR 1986 Comp., p. 189), Executive Order 12689, “Debarment and Suspension” (3 CFR 1989 Comp., p. 235) and 31 U.S.C. 6101 note (Section 2455, Pub. L. 103-355, 108 Stat. 3327).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         414,975
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  326,275
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               822,191
<PP&E>                                      18,741,912
<DEPRECIATION>                              12,797,004
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,253,610
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,413,189
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (111,900)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,253,610
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,262,702
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  879,045
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,004,491
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,010,190
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                381,451
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   381,451
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### Parrott *v.*Richardson.

[No. 19,185.

Filed April 20, 1900.]

Appeal and *Error.*— Evidence.—A finding and judgment will not be disturbed on the sufficiency of the evidence where there was legal evidence fully sustaining the finding, *pp. 455, 450.*

*Same.*— New *Trial.*— Affidavits.—Record.—No question is presented on an assignment in a motion for a new trial based upon newly discovered evidence, where the affidavits in support thereof are not made a part of the record by bill of exceptions or by order of court, *p. 456.*

Erom the Huntington Circuit Court.

*Affirmed.*

*M. L. Spencer*and *W. A. Branyan,*for appellant.

*L. L. Simons, J. G. Branyan*and *J. S. Branyan,*for appellee.

Monks, J.

Appellant sued appellee to recover a personal judgment against him for purchase money alleged to be due on the real estate described in the complaint, and to enforce an equitable lien therefor against said land. The case was tried by the court, and a general finding made in favor of appellee, and over a motion for a new trial judgment was rendered against appellant:

The only error assigned calls in question the action of the court in overruling appelant’s motion for a new trial.

The first, second, and third'causes for a new trial,present the question of the sufficiency of th'e evidence to sustain the *456decision of the court, and whether the same is contrary to law. It is not claimed that there was not sufficient evidence, if true, to fully sustain the finding of the court, but the weight thereof and the credibility of the witnesses are argued by counsel for appellant in their brief. There was legal evidence which fully sustained the finding of the court, and, although there was evidence to the contrary, we cannot, under the well settled rule, disturb the finding of the court or verdict of a jury under such circumstances. *Schmidt*v. *Zahrndt,*148 Ind. 447, 457; *Hoskinson*v. *Cavender,*143 Ind. 1, 2; Ewbank’s Manual, §46, p. 69; 2 Woollen’s Tr. Proc. §4385.

The fourth cause assigned for a new trial is newly discovered evidence. No question is presented for our determination by said specification, for the reason that the affidavits filed in support thereof are not made a part of the record by a bill of exceptions or order of court. *Heltonville, etc., Co.*v. *Fields,*138 Ind. 58, 66, 67, and cases cited; *Hoskinson*v. *Cavender,*143 Ind. 1, and cases cited; 2 Woollen’s Tr. Proc. §4430, and cases cited.

Finding no error in the record the judgment is affirmed.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Journal of healthcare, scienceand the humanities.**
 
Volume1: Number One | Number Two | Number Three | Number Four
Volume2: Number One | Number Two
 
SuDoc Number:D 206.25:
Item Number:0385-F (online)
CGP systemNumber:000834344
 
February 13, 2018
<PAGE>   1
                         FRONTIER FINANCIAL CORPORATION
                         1999 EMPLOYEE STOCK AWARD PLAN

     The 1999 Employee Stock Award Plan ("Plan") is established to recognize,
motivate and reward eligible employees for longstanding performance with
Frontier Financial Corporation, or its subsidiary Frontier Bank ("Frontier"),
and to encourage such employees to have a greater personal financial investment
in Frontier through ownership of its common stock.

     1.   Eligibility. The individuals eligible to receive stock awards under
this Plan shall be those individuals who, as determined by the Board of
Directors, have performed as valuable employees of Frontier for at least twenty
(20) years, or some other tenure as determined from time to time by the Board of
Directors of Frontier.

     2.   Stock Subject to Plan. The total number of shares of common stock
which may be awarded under the Plan is 10,000; provided, however, that the
number of shares of common stock which have been authorized for award under the
Plan, but which have not been granted, shall be proportionately adjusted for any
increase or decrease in the number of issued shares of common stock resulting
from a stock split, reverse stock split, stock dividend, combination, or
reclassification of the common stock, or any other increase or decrease in the
number of issued shares of common stock effected without receipt of
consideration by Frontier.

     3.   Stock Awards. Stock awards are to be made in Frontier common stock.
Each stock award shall be an amount of stock equal to about $1,000 in value, or
such other amount as determined from time to time by the Board of Directors of
Frontier.

     4.   Amendment and Termination. The Board of Directors may amend or
discontinue this Plan at any time for any reason by resolution of the Board of
Directors.

     5.   Non-Qualified Plan. This Employee Stock Award Plan is not a qualified
plan under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended.

     6.   Plan Administrator. The Board of Directors, in its sole discretion,
shall interpret and be the administrator of this Plan.

     Approved by the Board of Directors of Frontier Financial Corporation on
February 16, 1999.
```

[116th Congress Public Law 4]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 133 STAT. 5]]

Public Law 116-4
116th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To <<NOTE: Jan. 24, 2019 -  [H.R. 430]>>  extend the program of block 
grants to States for temporary assistance for needy families and related 
                     programs through June 30, 2019.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: TANF Extension 
Act of 2019.>> 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``TANF Extension Act of 2019''.
SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF THE TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY FAMILIES 
                    PROGRAM AND RELATED PROGRAMS THROUGH JUNE 30, 
                    2019.

    Activities authorized by part A of title IV and section 1108(b) of 
the Social Security Act shall continue through June 30, 2019, in the 
manner authorized for fiscal year 2018, and out of any money in the 
Treasury of the United States not otherwise appropriated, there are 
hereby appropriated such sums as may be necessary for such purpose.

    Approved January 24, 2019.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 430:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 165 (2019):
            Jan. 14, considered and passed House.
            Jan. 22, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
# C_2019134EN.01001001.xml

| 10.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 134/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/10

---

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Research Council Executive Agency for the financial year 2018 — amending budget No 1 (1)

(2019/C 134/03)

REVENUE

| Title
  Chapter | Heading | Budget 2018 | Amending budget No 1 | New amount |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 9 | EUROPEAN UNION SUBSIDY |
| 9 2 | EUROPEAN UNION SUBSIDY | 48 600 000 | 208 107 | 48 808 107 |
| 9 9 | MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE | p.m. | | p.m. |
| | Title 9 — Total | 48 600 000 | 208 107 | 48 808 107 |
| | GRAND TOTAL | 48 600 000 | 208 107 | 48 808 107 |

Title

Chapter

Heading

Budget 2018

Amending budget No 1

New amount

9

EUROPEAN UNION SUBSIDY

9 2

EUROPEAN UNION SUBSIDY

48 600 000

208 107

48 808 107

9 9

MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE

p.m.

p.m.

Title 9 — Total

48 600 000

208 107

48 808 107

GRAND TOTAL

48 600 000

208 107

48 808 107

EXPENDITURE

| Title
  Chapter | Heading | Appropriations 2018 | Amending budget No 1 | New amount |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | STAFF EXPENDITURE |
| 1 1 | REMUNERATIONS, ALLOWANCES AND CHARGES | 35 970 000 | 105 700 | 36 075 700 |
| 1 2 | PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND SOCIAL EXPENDITURE | 1 898 700 | 75 750 | 1 974 450 |
| | Title 1 — Total | 37 868 700 | 181 450 | 38 050 150 |
| 2 | INFRASTRUCTURE AND OPERATING EXPENDITURE |
| 2 1 | BUILDING EXPENDITURE | 5 515 100 | 41 090 | 5 556 190 |
| 2 2 | INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES (ICT) | 1 932 100 | –9 465 | 1 922 635 |
| 2 3 | MOVABLE PROPERTY AND CURRENT OPERATING EXPENDITURE | 323 600 | 85 600 | 409 200 |
| | Title 2 — Total | 7 770 800 | 117 225 | 7 888 025 |
| 3 | PROGRAMME SUPPORT EXPENDITURE |
| 3 1 | PROGRAMME MANAGEMENT EXPENDITURE | 2 960 500 | –90 568 | 2 869 932 |
| | Title 3 — Total | 2 960 500 | –90 568 | 2 869 932 |
| | GRAND TOTAL | 48 600 000 | 208 107 | 48 808 107 |

Title

Chapter

Heading

Appropriations 2018

Amending budget No 1

New amount

1

STAFF EXPENDITURE

1 1

REMUNERATIONS, ALLOWANCES AND CHARGES

35 970 000

105 700

36 075 700

1 2

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND SOCIAL EXPENDITURE

1 898 700

75 750

1 974 450

Title 1 — Total

37 868 700

181 450

38 050 150

2

INFRASTRUCTURE AND OPERATING EXPENDITURE

2 1

BUILDING EXPENDITURE

5 515 100

41 090

5 556 190

2 2

INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES (ICT)

1 932 100

–9 465

1 922 635

2 3

MOVABLE PROPERTY AND CURRENT OPERATING EXPENDITURE

323 600

85 600

409 200

Title 2 — Total

7 770 800

117 225

7 888 025

3

PROGRAMME SUPPORT EXPENDITURE

3 1

PROGRAMME MANAGEMENT EXPENDITURE

2 960 500

–90 568

2 869 932

Title 3 — Total

2 960 500

–90 568

2 869 932

GRAND TOTAL

48 600 000

208 107

48 808 107

---

(1)  Detailed budget available on the ERCEA website: http://erc.europa.eu/

---
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

January 2, 2009 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

137870 (33) Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

IN RE: LESTER LEWIS MASON Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

_________________________________ 

LESTER LEWIS MASON, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 137870 

 COA: 284760 

WAYNE CIRCUIT JUDGE, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

___________________________________ 

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it 

is DENIED because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be 

liable for filing fees. 

Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the 

Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $36.00, shall submit a copy of this order 

with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned 

with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being 

filed in this Court. 

If plaintiff timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly 

payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of 

the deposits made to plaintiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of 

$339.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court.

 Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file further appeals in this 

Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. 

The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff and 

return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order. 

jm 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 2, 2009 

Clerk