alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 6 A2 10 0 . I N RE: ESTATE OF CRAI G MARTI N MCGONI GLE.

M ax i m i l i an an d Ch an el McGo n i g l e ap p eal t h e t ri al co u rt ’ s o rd er ad m i t t i n g to

p ro b at e t he l as t wi l l an d tes t am en t o f Crai g M art in McGo ni g le. W e l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n.

Th e G eo rg i a Su p rem e Co u rt h as ap p el lat e ju ri s d i ct io n i n “ [a] l l cas es i nv o l v i n g

wi l l s

. ” Ga. Co n s t

. o f 1 9 8 3

, Art

. VI, Sec. VI, Par. III (3 ). A s t h e Su p rem e Co u rt h as

ex p lai n ed

, “ ‘ al l cas es i n v o l vi ng wi l l s ’ m ean s t h o s e cas es i n wh i ch th e wi l l ’ s v al id i t y

o r m ean i ng i s in q u es t i o n.” In r e Es ta t e o f Lo t t

, 2 5 1 Ga. 4 6 1 (3 0 6 SE2 d 9 2 0 ) (1 9 8 3 ).

Here, bas ed o n t h e reco rd b efo re u s , t h e c e n t ral is s u e on ap p eal ap p ears t o b e t h e

m ean i n g of t he d eced en t’ s w i l l. Co n s eq u en t l y , t h i s ap p e al is h ereb y

TRANSFERRED t o t h e Su prem e Co u rt fo r d i s p os i t i o n

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 08/17/2016 August 17, 2016
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 23.1


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent certified public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement on Form S-8 covering
the registration of 1,500,000 shares of In Focus Systems, Inc. common stock of
our reports dated January 22, 1998, included in the In Focus Systems, Inc.
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997 and to all
references to our firm included in this Registration Statement.


Arthur Andersen LLP


/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
--------------------------
Portland, Oregon
May 18, 1998



                                     II-28
U.S. Customs and

HAS ICH:
WU CERCLA
Pie talrke %

wR sa SS }

BN
en
{th Dit

EDO HER AMO AMD
Ai fila (“OE

4) BNE
ge Pei DE MOR PIE
5) Mien, EMT OMe easy

Lil, Fae eee x
1) ITU RY, i EORV. 12

LE BF
2)
3)
CTE AE 11, et seq. DFC, #
saSAaU CE LBLOW
>. >

{ili Je) DYE www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/toolbox/ports/ (#Cikie

US. Customs and Border Protection
Washington, D.C. 20229

CBP KO

Ba RB

ALES (AY <7 IK, wwwebp gov ZOECESU
cBP Publichtan WE Mbi 03 Revised June 2006

Japanese
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 18.1


Innova Corporation
Seattle, Washington

May 13, 1998

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We have been furnished with a copy of Form 10-Q of Innova Corporation for the
three months ended March 31, 1998, and have read the Company's statements
contained in Note 2 to the condensed consolidated financial statements included
therein. As stated in Note 2, the Company changed its method of accounting for
certain elements of cost included in its inventories and states that the newly
adopted accounting principle is preferable in the circumstances because it
provides a better matching of the costs incurred to manufacture the inventories
with their related revenues. In accordance with your request, we have reviewed
and discussed with Company officials the circumstances and business judgment and
planning upon which the decision to make this change in the method of accounting
was based.

We have not audited any financial statements of Innova Corporation as of any
date or for any period subsequent to December 31, 1997, nor have we audited the
information set forth in the aforementioned Note 2 to the condensed consolidated
financial statements; accordingly, we do not express an opinion concerning the
factual information contained therein.

With regard to the aforementioned accounting change, authoritative criteria have
not been established for evaluating the preferability of one acceptable method
of accounting over another acceptable method. However, for purposes of Innova
Corporation's compliance with the requirements of the Securities and Exchange
Commission, we are furnishing this letter.

Based on our review and discussion, with reliance on management's business
judgment and planning, we concur that the newly adopted method of accounting is
preferable in the Company's circumstances.

Very truly yours,

                                       /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


                                    PAGE 18
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000945372
<NAME> SIGCORP INC
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      722,411
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    107,965
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         150,921
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        48,221
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,029,518
<COMMON>                                        78,258
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            292,705
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 370,963
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     19,398
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           205,552
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              69,508
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  100,277
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 263,820
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                1,029,518
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      557,111
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            24,010
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     471,032
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     495,042
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         86,079
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                   0
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  86,079
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        11,593
<NET-INCOME>                                    50,476
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      1,095
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   50,476
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        30,188
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       17,604
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          81,559
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.12
        

</TABLE>
### Geology and ground-water resources of Medina County, Texas

By: Charles Lee Roy Holt

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1422

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

The Edwards limestone of Cretaceous age is the principal water-bearing formation in Medina County and makes up the major part of a ground-water reservoir, or aquifier, which in places includes thinner limestone formations both above and below the Edwards. The Glen Rose limestone, also of Cretaceous age, yields moderate amounts of water to wells and springs in the northern part of the county. Other Cretaceous formations, including the Austin chalk, Anacacho limestone, and Escondido formation, yield only small amounts of water, and that of the Austin and Escondido is of generally inferior quality.

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### § 182.99 Adjuvants for pesticide chemicals.

Adjuvants, identified and used in accordance with 40 CFR 180.910 and 40 CFR 180.920, which are added to pesticide use dilutions by a grower or applicator prior to application to the raw agricultural commodity, are exempt from the requirement of tolerances under section 409 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 348).

[76 FR 59249, Sept. 26, 2011]
[No. 15108-5-III.

Division Three.

December 4, 1997.]

#### *In the Matter of the Marriage of*Deborah Wright, *Respondent,*and William J. Wright, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pend Oreille County, No. 93-3-00068-5, Fred L. Stewart, J., entered August 10, 1995. *Affirmed in part*and *remanded*by unpublished opinion per Kurtz, J., concurred in by Sweeney, C.J., and Schultheis, J.
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ 01-10466 Summary Calendar

__________________

DONALD CARTER, JR; DONALD ARTIS Plaintiffs - Appellants

v. AURELIO CASTILLO, Constable and Individually and in his Official Capacity, DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS
Defendants
DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS Defendant-Appellee

______________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

3:99-CV-47-X

______________________________________________

December 14, 2001 Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *
Donald Carter, Jr. and Donald Artis, Deputy Constables in Dallas County, Texas, brought suit in the district court alleging
(1) racial discrimination and retaliation in violation of Title VII2

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; (2) retaliation in violation of
their First Amend ment rights; (3) violation of the Texas
Whistleblower Act; and (4) a state law claim of intentional
infliction of emotional distress. In a well-reasoned and thorough opinion, the district court granted summary judgment disposing of
all claims against the defendant-appellee, Constable Aurelio
Castillo and defendant-appellee Dallas County, Texas. Since filing
their appeal, the appellants have dis missed their appeal against
Constable Castillo and their appeal now concern s only Dallas
County, Texas. Appellants’ brief i s indeed brief and sparse. Even when
liber ally construed, it complains only of the district court rulings on their Title VII racial discrimination claims. All other
claims are not briefed and therefore not properly before us for
review. With respect to the Title VII discrimination claims, we
find no error in the district court rulings. We affirm for the

reasons set out in the Memorandum Opinion and Order of the district court dated February 7, 2001.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF HANCOCK FABRICS, INC. FOR NINE MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 
27, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL 
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-02-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-27-1996
<CASH>                                           4,160
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,356
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    160,303
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               170,877
<PP&E>                                          18,477
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 197,870
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           58,555
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              273
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     102,833
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   197,870
<SALES>                                        268,778
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               268,778
<CGS>                                          138,814
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  117,823
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,081
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,060
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,234
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,826
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,826
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .32
        

</TABLE>
U. S. Department of Homeland Security

 

 Office for Domestic Preparedness

 

Washington, D.C. 20531

ODP Information Bulletin

No. 82 September 26, 2003

TO: All State Administrative Agency Heads

All State Administrative Agency Points of Contact

FROM: Andrew T. Mitchell

Acting Director

SUBJECT: Allowable Training Costs

The Office for Domestic Preparedness (ODP) has recently received several requests from states

seeking clarification on allowable costs for training funds. Specifically, in question is whether travel

expenses, per diem, and lodging associated with students= attendance of ODP sponsored training

courses are allowable expenses under the State Homeland Security Grant Program Part II (SHSGP

II). Also in question is whether backfill costs associated with sending personnel to training are

eligible expenses under SHSGP II. Based upon further review of legislative language and intent and

program guidance, ODP has determined these expenses are allowable under SHSGP Part II,

provided that the training being attended is ODP sponsored training.

Grantees are reminded that travel reimbursement must be in accordance with state law as highlighted

in the United States Financial Guide. States must also follow state regulations regarding travel. If

a state or territory does not have a travel policy they must follow federal guidelines and rates, as

explained in the United States Financial Guide. For further information on federal law pertaining

to travel costs please refer to www.ojp.usdoj.gov/FinGuide.

Please feel free to contact your ODP Program Manager with additional questions regarding

allowable travel expenses.
IB 

Union Calendar No. 425 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7251 

[Report No. 118–512] 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize certain poison control 

programs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 6, 2024 

Mrs. CHAVEZ-DEREMER (for herself, Mr. JOYCE of Pennsylvania, Mr. DAVIS

of North Carolina, and Mrs. CHERFILUS-MCCORMICK) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

MAY 17, 2024 

Additional sponsors: Mr. CARTER of Georgia, Mr. TONKO, Mr. BACON, and 

Ms. CRAIG

MAY 17, 2024 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 

House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed 

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 

[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on February 6, 2024] 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 7251 RH

A BILL 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize 

certain poison control programs. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 7251 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Poison Control Centers 

5 Reauthorization Act of 2024’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF POISON CONTROL PRO7 GRAMS. 

8 (a) NATIONAL TOLL-FREE NUMBER AND OTHER COM9 MUNICATION CAPABILITIES.—Section 1271(c) of the Public 

10 Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300d–71(c)) is amended by 

11 striking ‘‘fiscal years 2020 through 2024’’ and inserting 

12 ‘‘fiscal years 2025 through 2029’’. 

13 (b) PROMOTING POISON CONTROL CENTER UTILIZA14 TION.—Section 1272(c) of the Public Health Service Act (42 

15 U.S.C. 300d–72(c)) is amended by striking ‘‘fiscal years 

16 2020 through 2024’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal years 2025 

17 through 2029’’. 

18 (c) POISON CONTROL CENTER GRANT PROGRAM.— 

19 Section 1273(g) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 

20 300d–73(g)) is amended by striking ‘‘fiscal years 2020 

21 through 2024’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal years 2025 through 

22 2029’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Union Calendar No. 425 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7251 

[Report No. 118–512] 

A BILL 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to 

reauthorize certain poison control programs. 

MAY 17, 2024 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Comand ordered to be printed mittee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Nutrients, Chlorophyll, and Oysters in the 

Guana Tolomato Matanzas NERR

Nikki Dix

Ed Phlips

March 3, 2010

Nutrient Sources

= wastewater treatment plant

= marina
Nutrient Load 

Estimates

Data Set Agency Source

San Sebastian 

River Discharge

United States 

Geological Survey

http://waterdata.usgs.gov

/nwis

San Sebastian 

River Nutrients

St. Johns River Water 

Management District http://www.epa.gov/storet

Moses Creek 

Discharge

United States 

Geological Survey

http://waterdata.usgs.gov

/nwis

Moses Creek 

(206) Nutrients

St. Johns River Water 

Management District http://www.epa.gov/storet
Nutrient Load Estimates
Nutrient Load Estimates
Monthly water samples for nutrient and 

chlorophyll a concentrations

(2002 – present)








Diel Variability
Diel Variability - Salinity

April 23-24, 2007

October 4-5, 2007

April 28-29, 2008

September 17-18, 2008
Diel Variability – TN

Dry Season 2007

Wet Season 2007 – after big rain event

Dry Season 2008

Wet Season 2008

Long-term average = approx. 0.37 mg/L
Diel Variability – TP

Dry Season 2007

Wet Season 2007 – after big rain event

Dry Season 2008

Wet Season 2008

Long-term average = approx. 0.05 mg/L
Diel Variability – Chl a

Dry Season 2007

Wet Season 2007 – after big rain event

Dry Season 2008

Wet Season 2008

Long-term average = approx. 5 μg/L
Nutrient Limitation Bioassays
Nutrient Limitation 

Bioassays

Station Sampling 

Date

1°

limitation

2°

limitation

FM March 09 N N+P
Nutrient Limitation 

Bioassays

Station Sampling 

Date

1°

limitation

2°

limitation

SS March 09 N N+P

Midpoint March 09 N N+P

FM March 09 N N+P

SS June 09 N N+P

Midpoint June 09 N N+P

FM June 09 N N+P

Biological Components

• Limited mobility

• Filter feeders

• Integrate water 

quality conditions 

over time
Oysters as Biological Indicators

• Limited mobility

• Filter feeders

• Integrate water 

quality conditions 

over time
Hypothesis

Oysters will be larger and denser in the 

St. Augustine region than in the Ft. Matanzas region.
Oyster Reef Sampling Locations:

St. Augustine Region
Oyster Reef Sampling Locations:

Matanzas Region
Percent Cover
Mean Percent Cover of Live Oysters
Oyster Collections:

Density

Biomass
Density
Biomass
Conclusions
Conclusions

• Highly flushed systems

• Further nutrient increases??
Any Questions?

Any Answers?
Office for Domestic Preparedness 

U.S. Department of Homeland Security 

Washington, DC 20531

ODP Information Bulletin 

No. 136 October 19, 2004 

TO: State Administrative Agencies 

State Homeland Security Advisors 

FROM: C. Suzanne Mencer 

SUBJECT: Revised Operational Cost Guidance 

ODP’s Information Bulletin #135, dated October 1, 2004 revised program guidance for operational 

overtime costs associated with providing enhanced law enforcement operations in support of federal 

agencies for increased border security and border crossing enforcement in selected states, during the 

pre-election and pre-inauguration period of heightened terrorist threat. This period runs from October 

1, 2004 through January 21, 2005. This operation has been named “Operation Stonegarden”. 

ODP’s program guidance for this period is further revised to allow for the payment of travel and 

perdiem for law enforcement officials while engaged in activities related to Operation Stonegarden. 

Northern and southern border jurisdictions may use available Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP) 

funds received through the FY 2003 State Homeland Security Grant Program, Part II (SHSGP II) to 

support these activities. 

Travel and perdiem expenses must be included in the operational plans submitted to Customs and 

Border Protection Headquarters, and must be included in budget detail worksheets submitted through 

the State Administrative Agency (SAA). 

For further information, please contact your Preparedness Officer or the ODP Helpline at 1-800-368-

6498.