alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 201

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 201 appear at 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004.

#### § 201.313 Estradiol labeling.

The article presently recognized in The National Formulary under the heading “Estradiol” and which is said to be “17-cis-beta estradiol” is the same substance formerly recognized in the United States Pharmacopeia under the designation “Alpha Estradiol.” The substance should no longer be referred to in drug labeling as “Alpha Estradiol.” The Food and Drug Administration would not object to label references to the article as simply “Estradiol”; nor would it object if the label of a preparation containing this substance referred to the presence of “Estradiol (formerly known as Alpha Estradiol).”
---

---

Exhibit 8

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

|Name of Subsidiary    | Jurisdiction of Incorporation | Percent Owned Directly or Indirectly by Registrant
|--------------------- | ----------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|                      |                               |                                                   
|NUR America, Inc.     | Delaware, USA                 | 100%                                              
|NUR Asia Pacific Ltd. | Hong Kong                     | 100%                                              
|NUR DO Brazil Ltda.   | Brazil                        | 100%*                                             
|NUR Europe S.A.       | Belguim                       | 100%*                                             
|NUR Japan Ltd.        | Japan                         | 100%*                                             

* Ellomay Capital Ltd. (the
Company) no longer owns these subsidiaries as they were sold in connection
with the sale of the Companys business to Hewlett-Packard Company and several of its
subsidiaries, which was consummated on February 29, 2008.



---

---
### Electric analog studies of flow to wells in the Punjab aquifer of West Pakistan

By: Maurice John MundorffG.D. BennettMasood Ahmad

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1608N

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
MONTEREY BAY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT

REGULATION II

PERMITS

10/30/84 Rule 208

1

RULE 208. STANDARDS FOR GRANTING PERMITS TO OPERATE 

(Adopted 9-1-74) 

1. General

The Air Pollution Control Officer shall deny a Permit to Operate for any new or modified stationary

source or any portion thereof to which Rule 207 applies unless:

1.1. the owner or operator of the source has obtained an Authority to Construct permit granted pursuant

to Rule 207; and, 

1.2. the Air Pollution Control Officer has determined that the sources and any sources which provide

offsets have been constructed and/or modified to operate, and emit quantities of air contaminants,

consistent with the conditions imposed on their respective Authority to Construct permits under Part 5.0.

of Rule 207; and,

1.3. the Air Pollution Control Officer has determined that any offsets required as a condition of the

Authority to Construct will commence at the time of or prior to initial operations of the new source or

modification, and that the offsets will be maintained throughout the operation of the new or modified

source. In the case of a new or modified source which will be, in whole or in part, a replacement for

an existing source on the same property, the Air Pollution Control Officer may allow a maximum of 90

days as a startup period for simultaneous operation of the existing stationary source and the new

stationary source or replacement; and,

1.4. the Air Pollution Control Officer has determined that all conditions specified in the Authority to

Construct permit have been or will be likely complied with by dates specified.

2. Requirements

The Air Pollution Control Officer shall require as a condition for the issuance of any Permit to Operate

for a new or modified source, that the source and any offset source be operated consistent with any

conditions imposed on their respective permits to construct under Part 5.0. of Rule 207.
MONTEREY BAY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT

REGULATION II

PERMITS

10/30/84 Rule 208

2

3. Procedures

The Air Pollution Control Officer shall perform the evaluations required to determine compliance with

this rule and shall take final action to approve, approve with conditions or deny any Permit to Operate

a new or modified stationary source or any portion thereof to which Rule 207 applies.

* * * * *
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

1

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANTHONY ANDRE SHARP,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

JOSEPH A. BICK,

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 08-16648

D.C. No. 2:08-CV-00443-GEB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Garland E. Burrell, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 10, 2010** 

Before: LEAVY, HAWKINS, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

Anthony Andre Sharp appeals pro se the dismissal of his petition for

removal of a California state court action to federal court. We have jurisdiction

FILED

SEP 01 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 For the reasons stated in the district court’s July 15, 2008, order, a 1

certificate of appealability is unnecessary in this case.

2

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. 

1

Sharp contends the district court erred by denying his petition for removal

because the state court and state officials are violating his constitutional rights. We

affirm the district court’s conclusion that, as the plaintiff in the underlying state

court action, Sharp cannot remove the case to federal court. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 1446(a); see also American Int’l Underwriters, (Philippines), Inc. v. Continental

Ins. Co., 843 F.2d 1253, 1260 (9th Cir. 1988) (“The right to remove a state court

case to federal court is clearly limited to defendants.”).

All pending motions are denied.

AFFIRMED.
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2011-1327 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2011-NM-091-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

Yes Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

A330-32-3241 R1 and A340-32-4282 R1

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
Exhibit
32




Certification of Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to Rule
13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act


of 1934 and 18
U.S.C. Section 1350




Each of the
undersigned, Jane F. Aggers and Larry D. Fair, certifies pursuant to Rule
13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 that (1) this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Hancock
Fabrics, Inc. (“Hancock”) for the quarter ended April 29, 2006 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and (2) the
information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Hancock.




Date: 
February 20, 2008








/s/
      Jane F. AggersJane F.
    AggersPresident and Chief
      Executive Officer/s/
      Larry D. FairLarry D.
    FairVice President,
      Finance (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
### Surface water supply of the United States, 1961-65, Part 9. Colorado River basin, Volume 2. Colorado River basin from Green River to Compact Point

By: Water Resources Division, U.S. Geological Survey

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1925

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
# L_2018298EN.01001001.xml

| 23.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 298/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 298/10

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2018/1837

of 22 November 2018

on the minimum selling price for skimmed milk powder for the 28th partial invitation to tender within the tendering procedure opened by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2080

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (1),

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1240 of 18 May 2016 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to public intervention and aid for private storage (2), and in particular Article 32 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2080 (3) has opened the sale of skimmed milk powder by a tendering procedure. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2080 (3) has opened the sale of skimmed milk powder by a tendering procedure.

| (2) | In the light of the tenders received for the 28th partial invitation to tender, a minimum selling price should be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

In the light of the tenders received for the 28th partial invitation to tender, a minimum selling price should be fixed.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 28th partial invitation to tender for the selling of skimmed milk powder within the tendering procedure opened by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2080, in respect of which the period during which tenders were to be submitted ended on 20 November 2018, the minimum selling price shall be 131,30 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 November 2018.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Jerzy PLEWA

Director-General

Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 206, 30.7.2016, p. 71.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2080 of 25 November 2016 opening the sale of skimmed milk powder by a tendering procedure (OJ L 321, 29.11.2016, p. 45).

3

---
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 22
- 0640 IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF: SALLY JO HUFFARD,

Petitioner and Appellee, and GREGORY ALAN HUFFARD,

Respondent and Appellant. ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPO INTMENT

This appeal being subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parties having failed to jointly and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c), IT IS ORDERED THAT **Kevin T. Sweeney,** whose name appears next on the list of attorneys desiring appointment as mediators for Domestic Relations appeals which is maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appointed to conduct the mediation process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time periods set forth in M.R.App. P., 7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appointment. A true copy of this order is being mailed to counsel of record for the parties, or to the parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof. DATED this December 9, 202 2.

Bowen Greenwood, Clerk of the Supreme Court
c: Gregory Alan Huffard, grealhuff54@gmail.com Matthew B. Gallinger, mgallinger@tolliverlaw.com Kevin T. S weeney , kevintsweeney@hotmail.com 12/09/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0640
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear at 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 117.330 Use of existing records. ( a ) Existing records (*e.g.,* records that are kept to comply with other Federal, State, or local regulations, or for any other reason) do not need to be duplicated if they contain all of the required information and satisfy the requirements of this subpart. Existing records may be supplemented as necessary to include all of the required information and satisfy the requirements of this subpart.
( b ) The information required by this part does not need to be kept in one set of records. If existing records contain some of the required information, any new information required by this part may be kept either separately or combined with the existing records.
###### Editorial Note on Part 201

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 201 appear at 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004.

#### § 201.17 Drugs; location of expiration date.

When an expiration date of a drug is required, e.g., expiration dating of drug products required by § 211.137 of this chapter, it shall appear on the immediate container and also the outer package, if any, unless it is easily legible through such outer package. However, when single-dose containers are packed in individual cartons, the expiration date may properly appear on the individual carton instead of the immediate product container.

[43 FR 45076, Sept. 29, 1978]
Editorial Note on Part 184
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 184 appear at 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; and 81 FR 49897, July 29, 2016.

§ 184.1081 Propionic acid. ( a ) Propionic acid (C3H6O2, CAS Reg. No. 79-09-4) is an oily liquid having a slightly pungent, rancid odor. It is manufactured by chemical synthesis or by bacterial fermentation.
( b ) The ingredient meets the specifications of the Food Chemicals Codex, 3d Ed. (1981), p. 254, which is incorporated by reference. Copies are available from the National Academy Press, 2101 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20418, or available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .*
( c ) In accordance with § 184.1(b)(1), the ingredient is used in food with no limitation other than current good manufacturing practice. The affirmation of this ingredient as generally recognized as safe (GRAS) as a direct human food ingredient is based upon the following current good manufacturing practice conditions of use: ( 1 ) The ingredient is used as an antimicrobial agent as defined in § 170.3(o)(2) of this chapter and a flavoring agent as defined in § 170.3(o)(12) of this chapter.
( 2 ) The ingredient is used in foods at levels not to exceed current good manufacturing practice.
( d ) Prior sanctions for this ingredient different from the uses established in this section do not exist or have been waived.
[49 FR 13141, Apr. 3, 1984]
AUG-05-2013 13:05 DOMBROFF GILMORE 

AIMI'ly 

Atlanta 

Brussels 

Denver 

Los Anggles 

Mieml 

New York 

McKenna Long 

&: AldridgeLL,. 

111 Washington Avenue • 71

h Floor 

Albany, NY 12210 

Tel: 518.935.2400 • Fax: 518.462.4875 

mckennalong.com 

FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL 

To: 

From: 

Phone: 

Re: 

Name/Company 

The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder 

U.S Department of Transportation 

Mark A. Dombroff 

703.336.8700 

Colgan Air, Inc. 

Fax No. 

(202) 493-5142 

FAA Docket No. CP09EA0002, -0005, -0016 

Number of Pages (including cover): .!J:::. 

COMMENTS 

Confidentiality Notice 

7033358751 P.01 

Northem Vlrglnia 

O~nge COUI'Ity 

R:~l'lcho Santa Fe 

Sen OlegD 

S~n Francisco 

Seoul 

WeshlnglOn, oC 

Date: August 5, 2013 

Phone No. 

(202) 366-2142 

The information contained in this facsimile is legally privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the 

individual or entity named above. lf the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 

dissemination, distribution or copy of this telecopy is mictly prohibited. If you have received this telecopy in error, please 

immediately notify us by telephone and return the original message to us at the address abovo. Thank you. 

If transmission is unclear or incomplete, please call sender at the above phone number. 
AUG-05-2013 13'06 DOMBROFF GILMORE 7033368751 P.02 

Albany 

Atlanta 

Brusscl$ 

De!'lver 

LOS Angeles 

Miami 

New York 

McKenna Long 

& AldridgeLLP 16:1'6lnt~trnational Drive • Penthouse 

Mclean, VA 221 02 

Tok 703.336.8800 

rnckennalong.~;om 

Northt:tn Vlrginla 

Orangl!: County 

Rancho Santa Fe 

S~n Diego 

$;;tn Fri!lnd~o 

Wa.$hing(on, DC 

MARK A. DOMBROFF 

703.336.6700 

EMAIL ADDRESS 

mdombmff@mckennalong.com 

August 5, 2013 

VIA FACSIMILE AND FIRST CLASS MAIL 

The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

U.S Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

Room E12-320 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Re: Colgan Air, Inc. 

FAA Docket No. CP09EA0002, -0005, -0016 

Dear Judge Yoder: 

Our client is agreeable to entry of the order submitted to you on July 29, 2013, in the 

above-referenced matter. 

We look forward to achieving a resolution of these matters with the Federal Aviation 

Administration and advising you of such. 

Thank you for your patience. 

MAD 

cc; Chris Lewereuz 

TOTAL P.02