alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 640 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 640

  Expressing support for the designation of December 3, 2017, as the 
                    ``National Day of 3D Printing''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 1, 2017

 Mr. Foster (for himself, Mr. Ryan of Ohio, Mr. Cicilline, Mr. Takano, 
Ms. Kaptur, Mr. Ben Ray Lujan of New Mexico, Mr. Khanna, Ms. Hanabusa, 
 Mr. Lipinski, and Mr. Farenthold) submitted the following resolution; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing support for the designation of December 3, 2017, as the 
                    ``National Day of 3D Printing''.

Whereas additive manufacturing, also known as 3D printing, is a process by which 
        digital 3D design data is used to build up a component in layers by 
        depositing material;
Whereas 3D printing creates an object layer by layer, greatly reducing waste and 
        increasing efficiency compared to traditional manufacturing techniques;
Whereas 3D printing has grown exponentially over the last several years;
Whereas the United States is a world leader in advanced manufacturing, and has a 
        history of design innovation;
Whereas public-private partnerships that promote advanced manufacturing, such as 
        the Digital Manufacturing and Design Innovation Institute and other 
        Manufacturing Innovation Institutes, will develop enhanced digital 
        capabilities to design and test new products and reduce costs in 
        manufacturing processes across a variety of industries;
Whereas 3D printing has widespread applications in home construction, home goods 
        production, biotechnology, the automotive sector, aerospace, medicine, 
        consumer electronics, and defense;
Whereas 3D printing has the potential to reshape manufacturing in the United 
        States, by decreasing the cost of producing goods for small businesses 
        and local manufacturers;
Whereas innovation will be increased, as 3D printing reduces the time required 
        for product development and market launch; and
Whereas, December 3, 2017, would be an appropriate date to designate as the 
        ``National Day of 3D Printing'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the designation of the ``National Day of 3D 
        Printing'';
            (2) recognizes the economic impact of 3D printing and the 
        positive implications of 3D printing for the United States 
        advanced manufacturing sector; and
            (3) encourages the promotion and celebration of 3D printing 
        technology.
                                 <all>
```
§ 1301.75 Physical security controls for practitioners. ( a ) Controlled substances listed in Schedule I shall be stored in a securely locked, substantially constructed cabinet.
( b ) Controlled substances listed in Schedules II, III, IV, and V shall be stored in a securely locked, substantially constructed cabinet. However, pharmacies and institutional practitioners may disperse such substances throughout the stock of noncontrolled substances in such a manner as to obstruct the theft or diversion of the controlled substances.
( c ) Sealed mail-back packages and inner liners collected in accordance with part 1317 of this chapter shall only be stored at the registered location in a securely locked, substantially constructed cabinet or a securely locked room with controlled access, except as authorized by § 1317.80(d).
( d ) This section shall also apply to nonpractitioners authorized to conduct research or chemical analysis under another registration.
( e ) Thiafentanil, carfentanil, etorphine hydrochloride and diprenorphine shall be stored in a safe or steel cabinet equivalent to a U.S. Government Class V security container.
[39 FR 3674, Jan. 29, 1974, as amended at 39 FR 17838, May 21, 1974; 54 FR 33674, Aug. 16, 1989; 62 FR 13957, Mar. 24, 1997; 79 FR 53562, Sept. 9, 2014; 81 FR 58839, Aug. 26, 2016]
§ 211.142 Warehousing procedures. Written procedures describing the warehousing of drug products shall be established and followed. They shall include: ( a ) Quarantine of drug products before release by the quality control unit.
( b ) Storage of drug products under appropriate conditions of temperature, humidity, and light so that the identity, strength, quality, and purity of the drug products are not affected.
SIP Completeness Checklist

Maricopa County Nonattainment Area

1. SUBMITTAL LETTER FROM GOVERNOR/DESIGNEE

See cover letter.

2. EVIDENCE OF ADOPTION

See cover letter.

3. STATE LEGAL AUTHORITY FOR ADOPTION/IMPLEMENTATION

See Appendix F for certified copies ofArizona Revised Statutes listed in cover letter.

4. COMPLETE COPY OF ACTUAL REGULATION

See Appendix F for certified copies ofArizona Revised Statutes listed in cover letter.

5. EVIDENCE THAT ARIZONA ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT

REQUIREMENTS (ARS § 41-1021 through 1036) WERE MET FOR RULE

See Enclosure 1.

6 EVIDENCE OF PUBLIC HEARING PER 40. CFR 51.102

See Enclosure 1.

7 PUBLIC COMMENTS AND AGENCY RESPONSE

See Enclosure 1.

8. IDENTIFICATION OF POLLUTANTS REGULATED BY RULE

Particulate Matter 10 microns and smaller in size (PM1O)

9. IDENTIFICATION OF SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS

See Enclosure 1
Not applicable.

12. RULE’S EFFECT ON EMISSIONS

See Enclosure 1

13 DEMONSTRATION THAT NAAQS, PSD INCREMENTS AND RFP ARE

PROTECTED

See Enclosure 1

14. EVIDENCE THAT EMISSIONS LIMITATIONS ARE BASED ON CONTINUOUS

EMISSIONS REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY

Not applicable.

15. MODELING SUPPORT

See Enclosure 1

16. IDENTIFICATION OF RULE SECTIONS CONTAINING EMISSION LIMITS,

WORK PRACTICE STANDARDS, AND/OR RECORD KEEPING/REPORTING

REQUIREMENTS

See Enclosure 1 and Appendix F for certified copies of Arizona Revised Statutes listed in

cover letter for approval.

17. .COMPLIANCEIENFORCEMENT STRATEGIES

See Enclosure 1, Dust Action General Permit in Appendix B, and companion MAG 2012

Five Percent Plan for PM- 10 for the Maricopa Nonattainment Area.

18 ECONOMIC TECHNICAL JUSTIFICATION FOR DEVIATION FROM EPA

POLICIES

No known deviation from EPA policy.
to

2012 Five Percent Plan for PM-b for the Maricopa County

Nonattainment Area

Certified Copies of Arizona Revised Statutes
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6651

TIMOTHY LAMAR ELLIS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

WARDEN RUSHTON; JOHN OZMINT, Director;

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SOUTH

CAROLINA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Beaufort. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.

(CA-03-835-9-25)

Submitted: November 18, 2004 Decided: November 24, 2004

Before LUTTIG and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joenathan Shelly Chaplin, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant.

Samuel Creighton Waters, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH

CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

 Timothy Lamar Ellis, a South Carolina inmate, seeks to

appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of

the magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under

28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final

order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Ellis has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
<PAGE>   1
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                                    FORM 8-K


                                 CURRENT REPORT

                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
                        SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


        Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):  April 4, 1997


                         United Security Bancorporation
               (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)



             Washington              0-18561              91-1259511
             -------------------------------------------------------
   (State or other jurisdiction    (Commission      (IRS Employer Identi-
        of incorporation)           File Number)     fication Number)


           9506 North Newport Highway, Spokane, Washington 99218-1200
           ----------------------------------------------------------
               (Address of principal executive offices/Zip Code)


      Registrant's telephone number, including area code:  (509) 467-6949
      -------------------------------------------------------------------


                            Item 5.    Other Events

United Security Bancorporation (the "Company") commented on an adjustment to
its earnings for fiscal year 1996.  A copy of the Company's press release dated
April 4, 1997, is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.


99.      Press Release dated April 4, 1997, issued by United Security
         Bancorporation.





                                       1
<PAGE>   2
                                 EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.                       Title
-----------                       -----

99.                               Press Release dated April 4, 1997,
                                  issued by United Security Bancorporation

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the security Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Dated:   April 4, 1997


                                  UNITED SECURITY BANCORPORATION

                                  By:  /s/ Chad Galloway
                                  ------------------------------
                                  Name:    Chad Galloway
                                  Title:   Vice President and
                                           Chief Financial Officer





                                       2
ATTACHMENTA RESOLUTION NO. 12-11 A Resolution of the Governing Board of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (Governing Board) certifying the previously prepared (October 2010) Final Environmental Assessment for Proposed Rule 1420.1

­ Emissions Standard for Lead From Large Lead-Acid Battery Recycling Facilities, as the CEQA document for the 2012 Lead State Implementation Plan for Los Angeles County (2012 Lead SIP for LA County), and adopting the 2012 Lead SIP for LACounty.

WHEREAS, the Los Angeles County portion ofthe South Coast Air Basin is currently classified as nonattainment for the 2008 lead National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) in accordance withthe federal CleanAirAct (CAA); and WHEREAS,the federal CAA requires State ImplementationPlans for areasnotin attainment with the 2008 lead NAAQS be submitted within 18 months ofthe effective date ofthe nonattainment designation, meeting the requirements ofpart D, Title 1ofthe CAA, whereby, the 2012 Lead SIP for LA County must be submitted to EPA by July 1, 2012; and WHEREAS, certain areas classified as nonattainment are required to attain the federal leadNAAQS by December 31,2015; and WHEREAS, the South Coast Air Quality Management District is committed to complywiththerequirements ofthe CAA; and WHEREAS, the 2012 Lead SIP for LA County demonstrates that the Los Angeles County portion ofthe South Coast Air Basin will attain the federal NAAQS for lead by 2015; and WHEREAS, the 2012 Lead SIP for LA County satisfies the planning requirements set forth in the federal and CaliforniaCleanAirActs; and WHEREAS, the South Coast Air Quality Management District Board finds and determines that the 2012 Lead SIP for LA County, is considered a "project" pursuant to the CaliforniaEnvironmental QualityAct (CEQA); and WHEREAS, the AQMD has had its regulatory program certified pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080.5 and has conducted CEQA review and analysis pursuantto suchprogram (Rule 110) for Rule 1420.1; and

1
[No. 39452-5-I.

Division One.

December 22, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. William Dowdell, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 96-1-01148-3, Linda Lau, J., entered September 3, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-20-0000481 29-OCT-2021 08:41 AM Dkt. 48 MO
[No. 21581-1-II.

Division Two.

November 7, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Harold L. Brooks, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pacific County, No. 96-1-00070-0, Joel M. Penoyar, J., entered January 17, 1997. *Reversed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS, FOUND ON
PAGES 3 AND 4 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE YEAR TO DATE JUNE 30, 1998 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             677
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,627
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        404
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,196
<PP&E>                                           7,909
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,998
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,011
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,312
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            2,793
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        61,402
<OTHER-SE>                                    (64,629)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,011
<SALES>                                          6,535
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,535
<CGS>                                            3,889
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,889
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,351
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (332)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,467)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,467)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,467)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.49)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           11509
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           12047
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                  2485
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      13388
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           18804
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         119201
<ALLOWANCE>                                       1516
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  191282
<DEPOSITS>                                      170212
<SHORT-TERM>                                      1634
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               2190
<LONG-TERM>                                        540
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          2164
<OTHER-SE>                                        6174
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  191282
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   2866
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  543
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   155
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                  3564
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                1209
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1233
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             2331
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  11
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   3410
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    738
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         738
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       504
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .23
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.62
<LOANS-NON>                                        925
<LOANS-PAST>                                       239
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   144
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  1752
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      280
<RECOVERIES>                                        44
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 1516
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              1516
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 341

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 341 appear at 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004.

#### § 341.18 Expectorant active ingredient.

The active ingredient of the product is guaifenesin when used within the dosage limits established in § 341.78(d).

[54 FR 8509, Feb. 28, 1989]
Exhibit 31.2
 
 Certification:
 
 I, Richard K Brock, certify that:
 
 1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Semele Group Inc;
 
 2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
 
 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 
 4.  The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 
 5.  The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.
 
 6.  The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
 
 
 
 
 
 /s/ Richard K Brock
 Richard K Brock
 Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 August, 23, 2004
Opinion issued October 7 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 14 - 00142 - CV

——————————— KAREY B. STATIN , Appella nt

V. DEUTSCHE BANK NATION AL TRUST COMPANY , Appell e e

On Appeal from the 190th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 2013 - 23471
MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Karey Bernard Statin attempts to appeal a n order granting a lien foreclosure application filed by appellee pursuant to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 736 . On April 30, 2014, we sent appellant a notice of intent to dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction because such orders are not reviewable by appeal. See T EX .2

R. C IV . P
. 736.8(c) (order granting or denying foreclosure application under Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 736 “is not subject to a motion for rehearing, new trial, bill of review, or appeal.”). We informed appellant that the appeal would be dismissed for want of jur isdiction unless he filed a response demonstrating that this Court has jurisdiction over this appeal Appellant failed to file an adequate response. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See T EX . R. C IV . P . 736.8(c); Thweatt v. Deut sche Bank Nat ’l Trust Co., No. 01

– 1 4

– 002 61

– CV , 2014 WL 2538691, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] June 5 , 201 4 , no pet. ) (dismissing appeal of Rule 736 order for lack of jurisdiction) ; Johnson v. Residential Funding Real Estate Holdings, LLC , No. 01

– 10

– 00287

– CV, 2011 WL 2418516, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] May 26, 2011, no pet.) (same). PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justice s Higley, Bland, and Sharp.