alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Geology and hydrology of Agua Caliente Spring, Palm Springs, California

By: L. C. DutcherJ. S. Bader

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1605

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Office for Domestic Preparedness 

U.S. Department of Homeland Security 

Washington, DC 20531

ODP Information Bulletin

No. 175 June 9, 2005 

TO: All State Administrative Heads 

 All State Administrative Agency Points of Contact 

All State Homeland Security Directors 

All State Emergency Management Directors 

FROM: Matt A. Mayer 

 Acting Executive Director 

SUBJECT: Additional Guidance on the Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI) 

Homeland Security Assistance for Nonprofit Organizations FY05 ISIP 

 Reporting 

Under the Fiscal Year (FY) 2005 Homeland Security Appropriations, $25,000,000 of UASI 

funding is made available to 18 Urban Areas for grants to 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations 

determined to be at risk of terrorist attack (see Section I of the FY05 Homeland Security Grant 

Program Guidance for a list of participating urban areas). This information bulletin serves as 

clarification on the requirements for the reporting of these funds in the FY05 Initial Strategy 

Implementation Plan (ISIP). 

Although funding may not be obligated at the time of FY05 ISIP submission, nonprofit 

allocations must be accounted for in the FY05 ISIP. In order to meet the 80% pass-through 

requirement, a solicitation must be issued to 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations within 60 days of 

the grant award. SAAs that have not already accounted for this funding in their FY05 ISIP are 

advised to: 

1. Designate one subgrantee for each urban area receiving 501(c)(3) nonprofit assistance 

funding as the placeholder for these funds. This subgrantee should account for the entire 

nonprofit assistance solicitation in that urban area. For the legal agency name, use the 

formatting convention “[Legal Agency Name] Nonprofit Assistance.” Ensure that the 

subgrantee is aligned with the appropriate urban area. 

2. Identify a generic project and provide details regarding the planned project(s). Name the 

project “Nonprofit Assistance Solicitation.” 

3. Align the “Nonprofit Assistance Solicitation” project to a goal from the Urban Area 

Strategy. 

This designated subgrantee will serve as a placeholder in the FY05 ISIP, until awards are made 

and funds are allocated to the authorized 501(c)(3) program participants.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 4 (Thursday, January 6, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 770]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-33348]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 4 / Thursday, January 6, 2011 / 
Notices

[[Page 770]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Southern Arizona Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Southern Arizona Resource Advisory Committee will meet in 
Tucson, Arizona. The purpose of the meeting is for the committee 
members to review and recommend the projects to be funded with the 
Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act funding.

DATES: The meeting will be held February 22, 2011, beginning at 9:30 
a.m. to approximately 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Pima County Parks and 
Recreation Department, 3500 West River Road, Tucson, AZ 85741. Send 
written comments to Jennifer Ruyle, RAC Coordinator, Southern Arizona 
Resource Advisory Committee, c/o Coronado National Forest, 300 W. 
Congress, Tucson, Arizona 85701 or electronically to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2f455d5a56434a6f495c01494a4b015a5c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c0aab2b5b9aca580a6b3eea6a5a4eeb5b3">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Ruyle, Coronado National 
Forest, (520) 388-8351.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public and 
opportunity for public input will be provided. Committee discussion is 
limited to Forest Service staff and Committee members. However, persons 
who wish to bring Public Law 110-343 related matters to the attention 
of the Committee may file written statements with the Committee staff 
before or after the meeting.

    Dated: December 27, 2010.
Reta Laford,
Deputy Forest Supervisor, Coronado National Forest.
[FR Doc. 2010-33348 Filed 1-5-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 182.3169 Butylated hydroxyanisole. ( a ) *Product.* Butylated hydroxyanisole.
( b ) *Tolerance.* This substance is generally recognized as safe for use in food when the total content of antioxidants is not over 0.02 percent of fat or oil content, including essential (volatile) oil content of food, provided the substance is used in accordance with good manufacturing practice.
# L_2018270EN.01000101.xml

| 29.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 270/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 270/1

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2018/1615

of 22 October 2018

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Lucanica di Picerno’) (PGI)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Italy's application to register the name ‘Lucanica di Picerno’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Italy's application to register the name ‘Lucanica di Picerno’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Lucanica di Picerno’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Lucanica di Picerno’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Lucanica di Picerno’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.2. — Meat products (cooked, salted, smoked, etc.), as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 October 2018.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 153, 2.5.2018, p. 15.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No.333-45375) pertaining to the 1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the
Amended and Restated 1994 Stock Option Plan, and the 1997 Directors' Stock
Option Plan of Corixa Corporation and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
333-67089) pertaining to the GenQuest, Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan, of our
report dated February 3, 1999 included in the Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1998.

                                                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Seattle, Washington
March 19, 1999




                                       61
§ 1305.28 Canceling and voiding electronic orders. ( a ) A supplier may void all or part of an electronic order by notifying the purchaser of the voiding. If the entire order is voided, the supplier must make an electronic copy of the order, indicate on the copy “Void,” and return it to the purchaser. The supplier is not required to retain a record of orders that are not filled.
( b ) The purchaser must retain an electronic copy of the voided order.
( c ) To partially void an order, the supplier must indicate in the linked record that nothing was shipped for each item voided.
§ 3.9 Effect of letter of designation. ( a ) The letter of designation constitutes an agency determination that is subject to change only as provided in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) The product jurisdiction officer may change the designated agency component with the written consent of the sponsor, or without its consent to protect the public health or for other compelling reasons. A sponsor shall be given 30 days written notice of any proposed nonconsensual change in designated agency component. The sponsor may request an additional 30 days to submit written objections, not to exceed 15 pages, to the proposed change, and shall be granted, upon request, a timely meeting with the product jurisdiction officer and appropriate center officials. Within 30 days of receipt of the sponsor's written objections, the product jurisdiction officer shall issue to the sponsor, with copies to appropriate center officials, a written determination setting forth a statement of reasons for the proposed change in designated agency component. A nonconsensual change in the designated agency component requires the concurrence of the Principal Associate Commissioner.
[56 FR 58756, Nov. 21, 1991, as amended at 68 FR 37077, June 23, 2003]
### Ground water in the upper part of the Teton Valley, Teton Counties, Idaho and Wyoming

By: Chabot Kilburn

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1789

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
§ 120.24 Process controls. ( a ) In order to meet the requirements of subpart A of this part, processors of juice products shall include in their Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) plans control measures that will consistently produce, at a minimum, a 5 log (*i.e.,* 105) reduction, for a period at least as long as the shelf life of the product when stored under normal and moderate abuse conditions, in the pertinent microorganism. For the purposes of this regulation, the “pertinent microorganism” is the most resistant microorganism of public health significance that is likely to occur in the juice. The following juice processors are exempt from this paragraph: ( 1 ) A juice processor that is subject to the requirements of part 113 or part 114 of this chapter; and
( 2 ) A juice processor using a single thermal processing step sufficient to achieve shelf-stability of the juice or a thermal concentration process that includes thermal treatment of all ingredients, provided that the processor includes a copy of the thermal process used to achieve shelf-stability or concentration in its written hazard analysis required by § 120.7.
( b ) All juice processors shall meet the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section through treatments that are applied directly to the juice, except that citrus juice processors may use treatments to fruit surfaces, provided that the 5-log reduction process begins after culling and cleaning as defined in § 120.3(a) and (f) and the reduction is accomplished within a single production facility.
( c ) All juice processors shall meet the requirements of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section and perform final product packaging within a single production facility operating under current good manufacturing practices. Processors claiming an exemption under paragraph (a)(1) or (a)(2) of this section shall also process and perform final product packaging of all juice subject to the claimed exemption within a single production facility operating under current good manufacturing practices.
[No. 21203-0-II.

Division Two.

December 5, 1997.]

#### Jeanne B. Ramirez, *Respondent,*v. Deborah A. Brown, et al., *Appellants.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 95-2-14126-4, Frederick W. Fleming, J., entered September 13, 1996. *Reversed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Champion Enterprises, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 27, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we,
Albert A. Koch, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Phyllis A. Knight,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

|                          
|--------------------------
|/s/ ALBERT A. KOCH        
|                          
|Albert A. Koch            
|Chief Executive Officer   
|Champion Enterprises, Inc.
|October 23, 2003          

|                          
|--------------------------
|/s/ PHYLLIS A. KNIGHT     
|                          
|Phyllis A. Knight         
|Chief Financial Officer   
|Champion Enterprises, Inc.
|October 23, 2003          

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>   1

                                    EXHIBIT 5


                                  May 20, 1998


In Focus Systems Inc.
27700B S.W. Parkway Avenue
Wilsonville, Oregon 97070

Gentlemen:

        We have acted as counsel for In Focus Systems, Inc. (the "Company") in
connection with the filing of a Registration Statement on Form S-8 (the
"Registration Statement") under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, covering
1,500,000 shares of common stock, (the "Shares") of the Company issuable under
the In Focus Systems, Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan (the "1998 Plan").

        We have reviewed those documents, corporate records, and other
instruments we deemed necessary for the purposes of this opinion. As to matters
of fact which have not been independently established, we have relied upon
representations of officers of the Company.

        Based on the foregoing, it is our opinion that, under the corporate laws
of the State of Oregon, the Shares offered and to be offered by the Company
under the 1998 Plan have been duly authorized under the Company's Amended and
Restated Articles of Incorporation and, when issued by the Company pursuant to
the terms of the 1998 Plan and, in the case of options granted thereunder, upon
payment therefor, will be validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable
securities of the Company.

        This opinion is dated as of the date hereof.

        We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement and to the reference to this opinion under Item 5 in the
Registration Statement.

Sincerely,

GARVEY, SCHUBERT & BARER

/s/ Garvey, Schubert & Barer



                                     II-27
Exhibit 99.1



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of NatureWell, Incorporated (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James R. Arabia, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition, and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ James R. Arabia
----------------------
James R. Arabia
Chairman of Board
and Chief Executive Officer
October 15, 2003



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-QSB of NatureWell, Incorporated (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert T. Malasek, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition, and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Robert Malasek
-------------------
Robert T. Malasek
Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
October 15, 2003
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 201 4 - 0 848 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 4 - CE - 0 31 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**