alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page
          1

        
          

        

      

      
        
        

      

    

     

    

     

    
      
        
        

      

      
        Page
          2

        
          

        

      

      
        
        

      

    

     

    

     

    
      
        
        

      

      
        Page
          3

        
          

        

      

      
        
        

      

    

     

    

     

    
      
        
        

      

      
        Page
          4

        
          

        

      

      
        
        

      

    

     

    

     

    
      
        
        

      

      
        Page
          5

        
          

        

      

      
        
        

      

    

     

    

     

    
      
        
        

      

      
        Page
          6

        
          

        

      

      
        
        

      

    

     

    

     

    
      
        
        

      

      
        Page
          7

        
          

        

      

      
        
        

      

    

     

    

     

    
      
        
        

      

      
        Page
          8

        
          

        

      

      
        
        

      

    

     

    

     

    
      
        
        

      

      
        Page
          9

        
          

        

      

      
        
        

      

    

     

    1

     

    
      
        
        

      

      
        Page
          10

        
          

        

      

      
        
        

      

    

     

    

     

    
      
        
        

      

      
        Page
          11

        
          

        

      

      
        
        

      

    

     

    

     

       

      
        
           

        

        
          Page
            12
# Query_110708
###### Editorial Note on Part 181

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 181 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996, and 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001.

#### § 181.26 Drying oils as components of finished resins.

Substances classified as drying oils, when migrating from food-packaging material (as components of finished resins) shall include:

Chinawood oil (tung oil).

Dehydrated castor oil.

Linseed oil.

Tall oil.

[42 FR 14638, Mar. 15, 1977; 42 FR 56728, Oct. 28, 1977]
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16A2100. IN RE: ESTATE OF CRAIG MARTIN MCGONIGLE.

Maximilian and Chanel McGonigle appeal the trial court’s order admitting to

probate the last will and testament of Craig Martin McGonigle. We lack jurisdiction.

The Georgia Supreme Court has appellate jurisdiction in “[a]ll casesinvolving

wills.” Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par. III (3). As the Supreme Court has

explained, “‘all cases involving wills’ means those cases in which the will’s validity

or meaning is in question.” In re Estate of Lott, 251 Ga. 461 (306 SE2d 920) (1983). 

Here, based on the record before us, the central issue on appeal appears to be the

meaning of the decedent’s will. Consequently, this appeal is hereby

TRANSFERRED to the Supreme Court for disposition.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

08/17/2016

August 17, 2016
§ 1313.35 Return declaration or amendment to Form 486 for international transactions. ( a ) Within 30 calendar days after an international transaction is completed, the broker or trader must file a report with the Administration through the DEA Diversion Control Division secure network application about the particulars of the transaction. This report must include the following information: The date(s) on which the listed chemical was released by the foreign customs officer(s) at the port(s); the actual quantity of listed chemical that left the country of export; the actual quantity of the listed chemical released by a customs officer at the port of entry; chemical; container; name of transferees; and the transaction identification and any other information as the Administration may specify. Upon receipt and review, the Administration will assign a completed report a transaction identification number. The report will not be deemed filed until the Administration has issued a transaction identification number.
( b ) If an international transaction for which a DEA Form 486 has been filed fails to take place, the broker or trader must report to the Administration that the international transaction did not occur utilizing the DEA Diversion Control Division secure network application as soon as the broker or trader becomes aware of the circumstances.
[81 FR 97040, Dec. 30, 2016]
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 2012

- 0719 Directorate Identifier: 2011

-NM

- 240

- AD If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed c ell

. **Estimated Costs:**  Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- h ours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

cost ( @ $8 5 /h our) Part s Cost T otal Costs ( labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U

. S

. Fleet

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0. 00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### The known number of products in compliance: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 0 

### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $
**On**
**- Condition Costs:**  Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- h ours

(include access, testing, and close

up) Labor cost

( @ $8 5 /hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES * NO

* Explanation: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES * NO

* Explanation: **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD h ave a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for either a Yes or No answer. YES NO Explanation: **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include speci fic requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES NO Explanation:
Low-Profile Self-Contained 

Breathing Apparatus

PROJECT OVERVIEW

Currently, structural firefighters use large, bulky Self-Contained 

Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) that extend far off the back of the 

firefighter. In addition to causing changes to the firefighter’s 

center of gravity, this can cause accessibility and safety issues 

in some of the work environments that firefighters encounter. 

Therefore, there is a need for a lower profile, lighter weight 

SCBA for structural firefighters.

DEVELOPMENT APPROACH

Avon is developing a high-pressure, low-profile SCBA, created 

under the Department of Defense’s Combating Terrorism 

Technical Support Office (CTTSO) Technical Support Working 

Group (TSWG) that will meet National Fire Protection 

Association (NFPA) 1986 standards. This design includes 

developing a high-pressure composite air cylinder that will be 

certified to U.S Department of Transportation (DOT) standards. 

Avon will leverage this design and create the structural 

firefighting low-profile SCBA that will be a more compact 

system design, with improved weight distribution of the 

cylinders across the user’s back. The program will include the 

design of additional components needed to meet flame 

resistance, decontamination, and increased robustness. 

The Low-Profile SCBA for the structural firefighter will be 

certified to the most current edition of NFPA 1981: “Standard 

on Open Circuit Self Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) 

for Emergency Services” and NFPA 1982: “Standard on 

Personal Alert Safety Systems (PASS).”

PROJECT IMPACT

By reducing the size and increasing the pressure of the 

cylinders, along with integrating multiple components into a 

single manifold, Avon is able to deliver a lower burdened, 

lighter weight and better-balanced product. This design will 

improve the comfort and increase safety of first responders.

STATUS OF PROJECT

Avon has completed the Kick-Off meeting with Department of 

Homeland Security Science and Technology Directorate but 

plans for on-site user evaluations have been postponed due to 

the COVID 19 pandemic.

User feedback is essential in understanding the critical needs 

of product performance, allowing the team to make 

modifications based on this feedback. The delay has allowed 

the team to advance the prototype to represent a more 

manufactured product. Several of the component builds will 

now be off production tooling.

Avon has received DOT approval on the 6,500 pounds per 

square inch low-profile cylinders, which will be used in the 

initial prototype build. Obtaining DOT approval allows for the 

team to do full system validation testing. 

Development of the carrier harness is moving towards 

completion. All plastic components are completed and ready to 

be sewn into the harness. 

Firefighter Low Profile SCBA Prototype

UPCOMING MILESTONES

Phase 1: Define User Requirements 

 1.2 Feedback to Evaluate End User Needs

 1.3 Upgrade Unit Design

 1.4 Revise Prototype and User Evaluation

 1.5 Preliminary Design Review

Contact Us: SandT.Innovation@hq.dhs.gov scitech.dhs.gov dhsscitech 

20 20 -01
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk March 4, 2013

t0225 

# Order

March 4, 2013

146368

KIMBERLY L. VROOMAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146368

COA: 313437

MCAC: 11

- 000141

FORD MOTOR COMPANY,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal prior to decision by the

Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court before consideration by t he

Court of Appeals.

V IVIANO , J., not participating.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 23, 2022

No. 04-22-00408-CR

Damien Devon DAVIS-PITTMAN,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 11, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 627590

Honorable Tommy Stolhandske, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s brief originally was due on September 22, 2022. On September 22, 2022, 

appellant filed a motion requesting a forty-five-day extension of time. The motion is 

GRANTED, and appellant is ORDERED to file his brief no later than November 7, 2022.

_________________________________

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 23rd day of September, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
###### Editorial Note on Part 181

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 181 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996, and 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001.

#### § 181.29 Stabilizers.

Substances classified as stabilizers, when migrating from food-packaging material shall include:

Aluminum mono-, di-, and tristearate.

Ammonium citrate.

Ammonium potassium hydrogen phosphate.

Calcium glycerophosphate.

Calcium phosphate.

Calcium hydrogen phosphate.

Calcium oleate.

Calcium acetate.

Calcium carbonate.

Calcium ricinoleate.

Calcium stearate.

Disodium hydrogen phosphate.

Magnesium glycerophosphate.

Magnesium stearate.

Magnesium phosphate.

Magnesium hydrogen phosphate.

Mono-, di-, and trisodium citrate.

Mono-, di-, and tripotassium citrate.

Potassium oleate.

Potassium stearate.

Sodium pyrophosphate.

Sodium stearate.

Sodium tetrapyrophosphate.

Stannous stearate (not to exceed 50 parts per million tin as a migrant in finished food).

Zinc orthophosphate (not to exceed 50 parts per million zinc as a migrant in finished food).

Zinc resinate (not to exceed 50 parts per million zinc as a migrant in finished food).

[42 FR 14638, Mar. 15, 1977; 42 FR 56728, Oct. 28, 1977]
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19-0241V

UNPUBLISHED

T R ,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: October 13, 2020

Special Processing Unit (SPU); 

Damages Decision Based on Proffer; 

Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder 

Injury Related to Vaccine 

Administration (SIRVA)

Carol L. Gallagher, Somers Point, NJ, for petitioner.

Camille Michelle Collett, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

On February 12, 2019, T R filed a petition for compensation 

under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.

2

(the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered an injury which meets the Table 

definition for shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) after receiving an 

influenza vaccine on October 2, 2017. Petition at 1, ¶¶ 2, 3. The case was assigned to 

the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On October 9, 2020, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled 

to compensation for SIRVA. On October 13, 2020, Respondent filed a proffer on award 

of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $34,000.00 for past 

pain and suffering. Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner 

agrees with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner 

is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am 

required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the EGovernment Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic 

Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the 

internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact 

medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. 

If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from 

public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease 

of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa 

(2012).
2

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump 

sum payment of $34,000.00, representing compensation for her actual pain and 

suffering in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. This amount represents 

compensation for all damages that would be available under § 15(a). 

The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this 

decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice 

renouncing the right to seek review.
§ 21.31 Records stored by the National Archives and Records Administration. ( a ) Food and Drug Administration records that are stored, processed, and serviced by the National Archives and Records Administration in accordance with 44 U.S.C. 3103 shall be considered to be maintained by the Food and Drug Administration. The National Archives and Records Administration shall not disclose the record except to authorized Food and Drug Administration employees.
( b ) Each Food and Drug Administration record pertaining to an identifiable individual that was transferred to the National Archives of the United States as a record determined by the National Archives to have sufficient historical or other value to warrant its continued preservation shall be considered to be maintained by the National Archives and shall not be subject to the provisions of this part.
[42 FR 15626, Mar. 22, 1977, as amended at 50 FR 52278, Dec. 23, 1985]
FACT SHEET

For more information, visit CBP.gov or contact the Office of Public Affairs at 202-344-1770. Pub. #: 2104-1115 10/15

NEXUS

NEXUS is a joint program with the Canada 

Border Services Agency that offers prescreened, 

approved travelers faster processing when 

entering the United States and Canada. NEXUS 

was established in 2002 as part of the Shared 

Border Accord, a partnership between the United 

States and Canada that creates open channels of 

dialogue and working groups committed to the 

mutual goals of securing our shared border, 

while promoting the legitimate trade and travel 

that is vital to both economies.

NEXUS is an example of cross-border 

coordination at work. A key goal of the 

partnership is to establish and expand trusted 

travel lanes at airports, waterways and land 

crossings. It’s a way to strike the right balance 

between enhanced security and more efficient 

travel between the U.S. and Canada.

The NEXUS membership card also fulfills the 

travel document requirements of the Western 

Hemisphere Travel Initiative, which requires 

a passport or other secure travel document by 

all U.S. and Canadian citizens seeking entry or 

re-entry into the U.S.

Individuals may qualify to participate in NEXUS 

if they are a citizen or permanent resident of 

the United States or Canada residing in either 

country, or if they are a citizen of a country 

other than Canada or the United States who 

plans to temporarily reside lawfully in Canada or 

the United States for the term of their NEXUS 

membership and who passes various criminal 

history and law enforcement checks by both 

countries.

NEXUS is an integrated program with one 

application and fee submission, providing 

expedited passage in the air, land and marine 

modes of travel. Approved members receive 

a radio frequency identification membership 

card. Individuals must have their iris scanned 

to have their membership accepted at airports. 

To participate, both the United States and Canada 

must approve an individual’s application. For 

NEXUS toll-free information (U.S. and Canada) 

call 1-866-NEXUS 26 (1-866-639-8726). For 

a complete list of eligibility requirements and 

locations, visit

www.cbp.gov/nexus or www.nexus.gc.ca. n

Membership & Locations

• Over 1.25 million members and growing

• 19 border crossing locations

• 29 enrollment centers

• 2 urban enrollment centers (Seattle, 

Washington and Vancouver, Canada)

• 33 marine reporting locations in the Great 

Lakes and Seattle, Washington regions

• 9 Canadian preclearance locations with 

kiosks at the following airports:

❖ Vancouver International

❖ Toronto Pearson International

❖ Billy Bishop, Toronto City

❖ Ottawa McDonald Cartier International

❖ Montreal Pierre Trudeau International

❖ Halifax International

❖ Calgary International

❖ Edmonton International

❖ Winnipeg International
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSpace Communications and Navigation Validation: Extracting Data for the Strategic Center for Networking, Integration, and Communications Scheduling AlgorithmsEfficiency in communication system architecture performance between Space Communications and Navigation (SCaN) assets and missions is crucial, as space communication is varied, complex, and often not utilized to its full potential. The SCaN Strategic Center for Networking, Integration, and Communications (SCENIC) new scheduling algorithms, which are designed to simulate the allocation of resources between SCaN assets and missions, have the potential to simulate an increase of this efficiency; however, they require real-world data to be validated against. The purpose of this project was to extract said validation data, which details the frequency and duration of utilized contact windows between missions and assets in the Near Earth Network (NEN), Space Network (SN), and Deep Space Network (DSN). Stored as images in daily operations summaries (DOSs), the tabular data existed in a variety of file formats such as.pdf, .docx, and .doc. Since the tables were stored as images, ABBYY® FineReader® (ABBYY Software Ltd.) optical character recognition (OCR) was implemented, which is a proprietary software that reads images from text. The comma separated value (CSV) output was utilized as input to a series of MATLAB® (The MathWorks, Inc.) methods for reformatting, at which point it was ready to be machine-read. Finally, the results were converted to a Microsoft Excel format for human readability. Along with being used for validation purposes, the data will also be used to map equipment degradation as a function of time to analyze the reliability of network assets.Document ID20190001796Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsKontur, Noah P.*(Washington Univ. Saint Louis, MO, United States)*Welch, Bryan W.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredMarch 22, 2019Publication DateMarch 1, 2019Subject CategorySpace Communications, Spacecraft Communications, Command And TrackingReport/Patent NumberE-19601GRC-E-DAA-TN60484NASA/TM-2019-219995Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 439432.07.01.03.02Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20190001796.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024