Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 37 / Thursday, February 25, 2010 / Notices 8723 

1. Type of Information Collection 

Request: New collection; Title of 

Information Collection: Part C and D 

Complaints Resolution Performance 

Measures: Use: Part C Sponsors provide 

medical coverage through at-risk 

arrangements with CMS. Part C 

Sponsors include: Local Coordinated 

Care Plans which include health 

maintenance organizations (HMOs), 

preferred provider organizations (PPOs), 

and provider sponsored organizations 

(PSO) plans; Private fee-for-service 

plans (PFFS); Special needs plans 

(SNPs); Medical savings account 

(MSAs); and Regional PPOs. Part D 

Sponsors provide prescription drug 

benefit coverage through private at-risk 

prescription drug plans that offer drugonly coverage Prescription Drug Plans, 

or through Medicare Advantage (MA) 

plans that offer integrated prescription 

drug and health care coverage (MA–PD 

plans). 

Due to Executive Order 13410, 

‘‘Promoting Quality and Efficient Health 

Care in Federal Government 

Administered or Sponsored Health Care 

Programs,’’ performance measurement 

ratings for Medicare Parts C & D can be 

found on Medicare Options Compare 

and the Medicare Prescription Drug 

Plan Finder (MPDPF), providing rating 

information for beneficiary use with 

plans being assigned a performancebased star rating. These ratings are 

provided to help beneficiaries make 

informed choices among the many plan 

alternatives available to them under 

Medicare Parts C and D. 

The purpose of the project is to 

develop and support implementation of 

a performance measure for the Medicare 

Advantage (Part C) and Prescription 

Drug (Part D) programs that represents 

plan resolution of beneficiary 

complaints from the beneficiary 

perspective. The project includes 

development of methodologies for: (1) 

Identifying a statistically valid sample 

of beneficiary complaints needed to 

analyze the complaint’s closure; (2) 

contacting, interviewing, and 

summarizing beneficiary experience; 

and, (3) summarizing/analyzing the 

resultant data to assess accuracy of the 

resolution of beneficiary complaints 

from the perspective of the beneficiaries 

via objective exploration of the 

beneficiary’s complaint resolution 

experience. Form Number: CMS–10308 

(OMB#: 0938–New); Frequency: Yearly; 

Affected Public: Individuals and 

households; Number of Respondents: 

5,300; Total Annual Responses: 5,300; 

Total Annual Hours: 884. (For policy 

questions regarding this collection 

contact Rachel Schreiber at 410–786– 

8657. For all other issues call 410–786– 

1326.) 

To obtain copies of the supporting 

statement and any related forms for the 

proposed paperwork collections 

referenced above, access CMS’ Web Site 

at http://www.cms.hhs.gov/ 

PaperworkReductionActof1995, or 

E-mail your request, including your 

address, phone number, OMB number, 

and CMS document identifier, to 

Paperwork@cms.hhs.gov, or call the 

Reports Clearance Office on (410) 786– 

1326. 

In commenting on the proposed 

information collections please reference 

the document identifier or OMB control 

number. To be assured consideration, 

comments and recommendations must 

be submitted in one of the following 

ways by April 26, 2010: 

1. Electronically. You may submit 

your comments electronically to 

http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for ‘‘Comment or 

Submission’’ or ‘‘More Search Options’’ 

to find the information collection 

document(s) accepting comments. 

2. By regular mail. You may mail 

written comments to the following 

address: CMS, Office of Strategic 

Operations and Regulatory Affairs, 

Division of Regulations Development, 

Attention: Document Identifier/OMB 

Control Number, Room C4–26–05, 7500 

Security Boulevard, Baltimore, 

Maryland 21244–1850. 

Dated: February 17, 2010. 

Michelle Shortt, 

Director, Regulations Development Group, 

Office of Strategic Operations and Regulatory 

Affairs. 

[FR Doc. 2010–3790 Filed 2–24–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4120–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Centers for Disease Control and 

Prevention 

[30Day–10–0739] 

Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork 

Reduction Act Review 

The Centers for Disease Control and 

Prevention (CDC) publishes a list of 

information collection requests under 

review by the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) in compliance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 

Chapter 35). To request a copy of these 

requests, call the CDC Reports Clearance 

Officer at (404) 639–5960 or send an email to omb@cdc.gov. Send written 

comments to CDC Desk Officer, Office of 

Management and Budget, Washington, 

DC or by fax to (202) 395–5806. Written 

comments should be received within 30 

days of this notice. 

Proposed Project 

CDC Oral Health Management 

Information System (OMB no. 0920– 

0739, exp. 6/30/2010)—Revision— 

Division of Oral Health, National Center 

for Chronic Disease Prevention and 

Health Promotion (NCCDPHP), Centers 

for Disease Control and Prevention 

(CDC). 

Background and Brief Description 

The CDC seeks to improve the oral 

health of the nation by targeting efforts 

to improve the infrastructure of state 

and territorial oral health departments, 

developing effective programs to 

improve the oral health of children and 

adults, and reducing health disparities 

among high-risk groups. Through a 

cooperative agreement program, CDC 

provides funding to oral health 

programs in states and territories. 

The CDC collects information from 

awardees to support oral health program 

management, consulting and evaluation. 

The information collection is supported 

by an electronic management 

information system (MIS) known as the 

Management Overview for Logistics, 

Analysis, and Reporting (MOLAR) 

system. The MIS provides a centralized, 

standardized and searchable repository 

of information about each awardee’s 

objectives, programmatic activities, 

performance indicators, and financial 

status. 

CDC requests OMB approval to 

continue the electronic collection of 

information for three years. The 

information collected will continue to 

facilitate CDC’s ability to monitor, 

evaluate, and compare individual 

programs; provide technical assistance 

to states and territories; share and 

disseminate lessons learned; assess and 

report aggregate information regarding 

the overall effectiveness of oral health 

infrastructure and capacity at the state 

and territorial level; and monitor 

national progress toward meeting 

Healthy People goals. 

Information will be collected 

electronically twice per year. No 

changes to the MIS or the estimated 

burden per response are proposed. 

There is an increase in the total 

estimated annualized burden due to an 

increase in the number of CDC-funded 

oral health programs. There are no costs 

to respondents other than their time. 

The total estimated annualized burden 

hours are 462. 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
8724 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 37 / Thursday, February 25, 2010 / Notices 

ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS

Type of respondents Number of respondents 

Number of responses per 

respondent 

Average burden per response 

(in hours) 

State Oral Health Programs ........................................................................................................ 21 2 11 

Dated: February 17, 2010. 

Maryam I. Daneshvar, 

Acting Reports Clearance Officer, Centers for 

Disease Control and Prevention. 

[FR Doc. 2010–3866 Filed 2–24–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4163–18–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Centers for Disease Control and 

Prevention 

[30Day–10–09CH] 

Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork 

Reduction Act Review 

The Centers for Disease Control and 

Prevention (CDC) publishes a list of 

information collection requests under 

review by the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) in compliance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 

Chapter 35). To request a copy of these 

requests, call the CDC Reports Clearance 

Officer at (404) 639–5960 or send an email to omb@cdc.gov. Send written 

comments to CDC Desk Officer, Office of 

Management and Budget, Washington, 

DC or by fax to (202) 395–5806. Written 

comments should be received within 30 

days of this notice. 

Proposed Project 

A Controlled Evaluation of Expect 

Respect Support Groups (ERSG): 

Preventing and Interrupting Teen Dating 

Violence among At-Risk Middle and 

High School Students—New—National 

Center for Injury Prevention and Control 

(NCIPC), Division of Violence 

Prevention (DVP), Centers for Disease 

Control and Prevention (CDC). 

Background and Brief Description 

The prevalence and consequences of 

teen dating violence make it a public 

health concern that requires early and 

effective prevention. To date, only three 

prevention strategies—Safe Dates, the 

Youth Relationships Project, and 4th 

R—have demonstrated reductions in 

dating violence behaviors in rigorous, 

controlled evaluations, and only one of 

these (Safe Dates) has effectively 

prevented sexual violence. In order to 

protect young people and build the 

evidence for effective prevention 

strategies, evaluations of additional 

programs are needed, including those 

programs currently in the field. Expect 

Respect Support Groups (provided by 

Safe Place) are currently in use in the 

Austin Independent School District and 

demonstrates promising results in an 

uncontrolled program evaluation, which 

strongly suggests a controlled evaluation 

is warranted to more rigorously examine 

program effects. 

The proposed study has two primary 

goals and two exploratory aims. The 

primary goals are: (1) To evaluate the 

effectiveness of Expect Respect Support 

Groups (ERSG) in preventing and 

reducing teen dating violence and (2) 

Comparing whether there is increased 

healthy conflict resolution skills 

reported by at-risk male and female 

middle and high school students 

supported by ERSG, compared to at-risk 

students in control schools who do not 

receive ERSG. 

The exploratory aims are: (1) To 

evaluate whether or not the 

effectiveness of ERSG is enhanced by 

the presence of universal, school-wide 

prevention programs, and (2) To 

examine whether participants with 

different characteristics respond 

differently to the intervention. For 

example, we will determine whether 

outcome for boys or girls are the same. 

The proposed evaluation will use a 

quasi-experimental/non-randomized 

design in which a convenience sample 

of participants in schools receiving 

universal and/or targeted prevention 

services are compared to students in 

control schools in which no dating 

violence prevention services are 

available. Based on past experience with 

an uncontrolled program evaluation of 

Expect Respect Support groups, we 

anticipate that in the Austin 

Independent School District, 800 

students will undergo an Intake 

Assessment. From that number, 600 

respondents from the intervention and 

control groups will be eligible for the 

Baseline Survey, and from that number, 

400 will complete the Completion 

Survey. 

Therefore, over three years we will 

recruit 1800 students (300 per year from 

intervention schools and 300 per year 

from control schools), of whom we 

anticipate 1200 will have complete data. 

Control schools will be selected that 

have characteristics (e.g., risk status, 

socio-economic status) similar to the 

Austin Independent School District 

intervention schools. 

There is no cost to respondents. The 

total estimated annual burden hours are 

2000. 

ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS

Type of respondent Form name Number of 

respondents 

Number of 

responses 

per respondent 

Average 

burden per 

response (in 

hours) 

Control Schools (School districts surrounding Austin Independent 

School District).

Intake assessment ..................... 400 1 15/60 

Baseline Survey ......................... 300 1 1 

Completion Survey ..................... 200 1 1 

Follow-up Survey 1 .................... 200 1 1 

Follow-up Survey 2 .................... 200 1 1 

Intervention Schools (Austin Independent School District) ............ Intake assessment ..................... 400 1 15/60 

Baseline Survey ......................... 300 1 1 

Completion Survey ..................... 200 1 1 

Follow-up Survey 1 .................... 200 1 1 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES