alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2018083DE.01002001.xml

| 27.3.2018 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 83/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2018

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 83/20

---

Berichtigung der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) 2018/34 der Kommission vom 28. September 2017 zur Festlegung technischer Durchführungsstandards für das standardisierte Format für die Entgeltinformation und des betreffenden gemeinsamen Symbols gemäß der Richtlinie 2014/92/EU des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 6 vom 11. Januar 2018
  )

Seite 39, Artikel 4 Überschrift:

Anstatt:

„Name des Kontoinhabers“

muss es heißen:

„Kontobezeichnung“.

Seite 39, Artikel 4 einziger Satz:

Anstatt:

„Der Name des Kontoinhabers wird in Fettdruck und linksbündig unter dem Namen des Kontoanbieters aufgeführt.“,

muss es heißen:

„Die Kontobezeichnung wird in Fettdruck und linksbündig unter dem Namen des Kontoanbieters aufgeführt.“

Seite 39, Artikel 5 einziger Satz:

Anstatt:

„Das Datum der letzten Aktualisierung der Entgeltinformation wird in der in Artikel 1 Absatz 2 Buchstabe d festgelegten Schriftgröße und -art linksbündig unter dem Namen des Kontoinhabers aufgeführt.“,

muss es heißen:

„Das Datum der letzten Aktualisierung der Entgeltinformation wird in der in Artikel 1 Absatz 2 Buchstabe d festgelegten Schriftgröße und -art linksbündig unter der Kontobezeichnung aufgeführt.“

Seite 40, Artikel 8 Absatz 2 und Artikel 9 Absatz 3

Anstatt:

„Der Zahlungsdienstleister führt Informationen über zusätzliche Entgelte für Dienste an, die nach Artikel 10 über die im Dienstleistungspaket inbegriffene Anzahl hinausgehen.“,

muss es heißen:

„Der Zahlungsdienstleister führt gemäß Artikel 10 Informationen über zusätzliche Entgelte für Dienste an, die über die im Dienstleistungspaket inbegriffene Anzahl hinausgehen.“

Seite 40, Artikel 8 Absatz 3 und Seite 41 Artikel 9 Absatz 4

Anstatt:

„Unterliegen die im Dienstleistungspaket inbegriffenen Dienste keiner zahlenmäßigen Beschränkung, streicht der Zahlungsdienstleister den Zusatz ‚Über diese Anzahl hinausgehende Dienste wurden getrennt in Rechnung gestellt‘ ...“,

muss es heißen:

„Unterliegen die im Dienstleistungspaket inbegriffenen Dienste keiner zahlenmäßigen Beschränkung, streicht der Zahlungsdienstleister den Zusatz ‚Über diese Anzahl hinausgehende Dienste werden getrennt in Rechnung gestellt‘ ...“.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         650,152
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,091,695
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (108,602)
<INVENTORY>                                  1,576,734
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                76,196
<PP&E>                                       1,550,013
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,319,214)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,516,974
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,768,482
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  5,118,095
<COMMON>                                       130,268
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,608,631)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,516,974
<SALES>                                        471,141
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               901,753
<CGS>                                          574,262
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  574,262
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               683,643
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,692
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (381,844)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (381,844)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (381,844)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
§ 1.1110 What are the general requirements for submitting information to FDA under this subpart? ( a ) All applications, reports, notifications, and records submitted to FDA under this subpart must be submitted electronically and in English unless otherwise specified. If FDA requests inspection or submission of records that are maintained in any language other than English, the recognized accreditation body or LAAF-accredited laboratory must provide an English translation within a reasonable time.
( b ) A program applicant must provide any translation and interpretation services needed by FDA during the processing of the application, including during any onsite assessments of the applicant by FDA.
H. R. 7180 

One Hundred Eighteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-four 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 80 1st 

Street in Kingsland, Arkansas, as the ‘‘Kingsland ‘Johnny Cash’ Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. KINGSLAND ‘‘JOHNNY CASH’’ POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 80 1st Street in Kingsland, Arkansas, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘Kingsland ‘Johnny Cash’ Post 

Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Kingsland ‘Johnny Cash’ Post Office’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
<PAGE>   1

                                  EXHIBIT 23.1


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
   
         We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" in
Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-44637) and 
related Prospectus of Ride, Inc. for the registration of 2,608,729 shares of
its common stock and to the incorporation by reference therein of our report
dated March 3, 1998, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of Ride, Inc. included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K as amended by
Form 10-K/A) for the year ended December 31, 1997, filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.
    



   
Seattle, Washington
March 27, 1998                             ERNST & YOUNG LLP
SERVED: JANUARY 24, ZUIZ 

');ZPARTIviENTOF 

i'lANSPORTATION 

:':CKtTO^ERATiGNS 

m JAN :?5 A RMi2 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE o r HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

APPLICATION OF 

SUN QUEST EXECUTIVE AIR CHARTER, INC. 

For fees and expenses under the 

Equal Access to Justice Act 

FDMSNo. FAA-20n-1294 

ORDE R O N APPLICANT' S BRIE F 

Sun Quest Executive Air Charter, Inc. ("the Applicant") has filed an "Application 

for An Award of Attorney Fees and Other Expenses Pursuant to the Equal Access to 

lustice Act (EAjA)," tri^Eering this proceeding. The matter was assigned to the 

undersigned by Notice dated |anuary 17, 2012. It will be decided under the EAJA 

provisions, 5 U.S.C. §504, and implementing regulations 14 C.F.R. §14. 

Complainant Federal Aviation Administration has already filed a brief in 

opposition. The Applicant will have an opportunity to respond. 

WHEREUPON, it is ORDERED as follows: 

Applicant Sun Quest Executive Air Charter, Inc. shall file a brief 

supporting its Application no later than the close of business on February 

10,2012. 
Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
FAA Docket No. CP08WP0004 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Dockei Clerk, AGC-430, 

Wilbur Wrighi Building—Suite 2WI000' 

ONE COPY 

Sun Quest Executive Air Charter, Inc. 

Attn: Mark Chiulcs Smith, Chief Pilol 

7436 Hayvcnhurst Ave. 

VanNuys, CA 91406 

Arthur Wasscrman, Esq. 

Law Offices of Wasserman & Miller 

16380 Rcscoe Blvd., Suite 120 

VanNuy.s, CA 91406-1221 

TEL: (818)895-8234 

FAX; (818) 895-0675 

Naomi Tsuda, Regional Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Wcsteni-Pacific Region. AWP-7 

P.O. Box 92007 

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

TEL: (310)725-7101 

FAX; (310)725-6816 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

Adniinislralive Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building, Ground Floor 

Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor (202) 366-2139; Legal Assistant 6-512 

FAX: (202)366-7536 

' Service was hy U.S. Mail. For service in person oi by expedited courier, use the fdUowini; address: Federal 

Avialion Adminislratitm. 600 hidependence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wiighl Building—Suile 2W10nO. Washinclon. 

DC 20591; Aiientiun; Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC 430.
Editorial Note on Part 312
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 312 appear at 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004.

§ 312.300 General. ( a ) *Scope.* This subpart contains the requirements for the use of investigational new drugs and approved drugs where availability is limited by a risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (REMS) when the primary purpose is to diagnose, monitor, or treat a patient's disease or condition. The aim of this subpart is to facilitate the availability of such drugs to patients with serious diseases or conditions when there is no comparable or satisfactory alternative therapy to diagnose, monitor, or treat the patient's disease or condition.
( b ) *Definitions.* The following definitions of terms apply to this subpart: *Immediately life-threatening disease or condition* means a stage of disease in which there is reasonable likelihood that death will occur within a matter of months or in which premature death is likely without early treatment.
*Serious disease or condition* means a disease or condition associated with morbidity that has substantial impact on day-to-day functioning. Short-lived and self-limiting morbidity will usually not be sufficient, but the morbidity need not be irreversible, provided it is persistent or recurrent. Whether a disease or condition is serious is a matter of clinical judgment, based on its impact on such factors as survival, day-to-day functioning, or the likelihood that the disease, if left untreated, will progress from a less severe condition to a more serious one.
### An appraisal of potential ground-water salvage along the Pecos River between Acme and Artesia, New Mexico

By: Reed W. MowerJ. W. HoodR.L. CushmanR.L. BortonS.E. Galloway

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1659

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **1**                            (2196 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **2**                            (2513 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **3**                            (2573 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **4**                            (1841 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **5**                            (2392 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **6**                            (2121 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 7**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 8**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 10**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Merrick M. HINES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-31228.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Oct. 25, 2005.

Josette Louise Cassiere, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Kevin Zolot, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western District of Louisiana, Shreveport, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Joseph Ransdell Keene, Law Offices of J. Ransdell Keene, Shreveport, LA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Merrick M. Hines appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). He argues that the district court erred in departing upward in sentencing him based on his police arrest record and incident report records. After *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), this court reviews sentences for reasonableness. *United States v. Smith,*417 F.3d 483, 491-92 (5th Cir.2005). The district court based its decision to depart upward on Hines’s similar criminal convictions involving the use of a firearm, a juvenile negligent homicide, an old cocaine possession, accessory to murder for which the punishment was too lenient, and Hines’s other criminal conduct demonstrating a consistent pattern of criminal behavior. The district court also determined that Hines’s criminal history category substantially underrepresented the seriousness of his criminal history and that his criminal *352history establishes a likelihood that he will commit other crimes in the future. The district court considered the policy statement in U.S.S.G. § 4A1.3 and the factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). The sentence imposed was reasonable for the reasons given by the district court at the sentencing hearing. *See Smith,*417 F.3d at 489. There is nothing in the record to show that the district court would have imposed a lesser sentence under an advisory guidelines scheme. *See id.*Therefore, the district court’s judgment is

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Editorial Note on Part 176
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 176 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; and 70 FR 72074, Dec. 1, 2005.

§ 176.350 Tamarind seed kernel powder. Tamarind seed kernel powder may be safely used as a component of articles intended for use in producing, manufacturing, packing, processing, preparing, treating, packaging, transporting, or holding food, subject to the provisions of this section. ( a ) Tamarind seed kernel powder is the ground kernel of tamarind seed (*Tamarindus indica* L.) after removal of the seed coat.
( b ) It is used in the manufacture of paper and paperboard.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7279 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7279

     To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to reduce the 
   administrative burden on physicians and physical and occupational 
      therapists, with respect to plan of care certification and 
                     recertification requirements.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2024

 Mr. Davis of North Carolina (for himself and Mr. Smucker) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
  Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a 
 period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to reduce the 
   administrative burden on physicians and physical and occupational 
      therapists, with respect to plan of care certification and 
                     recertification requirements.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Remove Duplicative Unnecessary 
Clerical Exchanges Act'' or the ``REDUCE Act''.

SEC. 2. REDUCING THE ADMINISTRATIVE BURDEN ON PHYSICIANS AND PHYSICAL 
              THERAPISTS WITH RESPECT TO PLAN OF CARE CERTIFICATION AND 
              RECERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS.

    Section 1835(a) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395n(a)) is 
amended by adding at the end of the flush left text the following: 
``With respect to the certification and recertification requirements 
under paragraph (2), in the case of outpatient physical therapy 
services or outpatient occupational therapy services (as described in 
subparagraph (C) of such paragraph) furnished to an individual on or 
after the date of enactment of this sentence under an order from a 
physician, such requirements shall be deemed satisfied if the qualified 
physical therapist or occupational therapist submits a plan of care to 
the ordering physician within 30 days of such qualified physical 
therapist or occupational therapist completing an initial evaluation of 
such individual or documenting the need for additional intervals of 
service. Such ordering physician may amend such plan of care within 10 
business days of the receipt of such plan of care. No references to an 
order in this subsection shall be construed to require an order for 
outpatient physical therapy or occupational therapy.''.
                                 <all>
```
### Chemical quality of the water in the Tucson basin, Arizona

By: R. L. Laney

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1939D

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (4732 pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
MEMORANDUM 

TO: Portland Cement MACT Docket 

FROM: Steven Silverman, Attorney OGC 

RE: Telephone Call with Dick Wilson, Ash Grove Cement representative Nov. 18, 2009 

 I talked briefly by phone with Dick Wilson on Nov. 18 responding to a question he 

raised. Specifically, he asked that supposing we subcategorized for high Hg limestone sources 

and established a beyond the floor Hg standard for sources in the subcategory, did we have 

discretion to promulgate an open-ended standard or must we establish a single numerical (or 

percent reduction) standard. I quoted the language of 112 d 2 to him, and also explained the 

findings we would need to make in order to adopt a work practice.