alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1998 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT
OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          12,463
<SECURITIES>                                     7,746
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,711
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      6,663
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,139
<PP&E>                                          23,847
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,501
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  49,844
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,695
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            15
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,490
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    49,844
<SALES>                                         10,730
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,021
<CGS>                                            4,993
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,053
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                27,489
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  25
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (22,524)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (22,524)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (22,524)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.55)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.55)
        

</TABLE>
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*February 11, 2008*

[Cite as *02/11/2008 Case Announcements,*2008-Ohio-497.]

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2008-0160.

#### McAllister v. Smith.

Marion App. No. 9-07-45. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Marion County. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for appointment of counsel,

It is ordered by the court that the motion is denied.
# EUR-Lex - 31993D0152 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31993D0152

**93/152/EEC: Commission Decision of 8 February 1993 laying down the criteria for vaccines to be used against Newcastle disease in the context of routine vaccination programmes **

*
Official Journal L 059 , 12/03/1993 P. 0035 - 0035 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 48 P. 0167 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 48 P. 0167 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 8 February 1993 laying down the criteria for vaccines to be used against Newcastle disease in the context of routine vaccination programmes

(93/152/EEC)THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 90/539/EEC of 15 October 1990 on animal health conditions governing intra-Community trade in and imports from third countries of poultry and hatching eggs (1), as last amended by Council Directive 92/65/EEC (2), and in particular Annex III thereof,

Whereas Annex III of Directive 90/539/EEC states that the Commission may determine the criteria for using vaccines against Newcastle disease in the context of routine vaccination programmes;

Whereas the said criteria shall ensure that live attenuated and inactivated vaccines used in routine vaccination programmes fulfil certain requirements relating in the intracerebral pathogenicity index (ICPI) in respect of the Newcastle disease virus strain used in the said vaccines;

Whereas it seems desirable that the level of intracerebral pathogenicity index virus strains to be used in vaccine production should be clearly defined;

Whereas the Scientific Veterinary Committee and the Standing Veterinary Committee have been consulted,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

For the use in routine vaccination programmes:

(a) live attenuated Newcastle disease vaccines shall be prepared from a Newcastle disease virus strain for which the master seed has been tested and shown to have an intracerebral pathogenicity index (ICPI) of:

(i) less than 0,4 if not less than 107 EID50 are administrated to each bird in the ICPI test;

or

(ii) less than 0,5 if not less than 108 EID50 are administered to each bird, in the ICPI test;

(b) inactivated Newcastle disease vaccines shall be prepared from a Newcastle disease virus strain for which the Master Seed has been tested and shown to have an intracerebral pathogenicity index (ICPI) of less than 0,7 if not less than 108 EID50 are administered to each bird in the ICPI test.

Article 2

The present Decision shall apply from 1 January 1995.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 8 February 1993.

For the Commission

René STEICHEN

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 303, 31. 10. 1990, p. 6.

(2) OJ No L 268, 14. 9. 1992, p. 54.
Editorial Note on Part 184
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 184 appear at 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; and 81 FR 49897, July 29, 2016.

§ 184.1205 Calcium hydroxide. ( a ) Calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2, CAS Reg. No. 1305-62-0) is also known as slaked lime or calcium hydrate. It is produced by the hydration of lime.
( b ) The ingredient meets the specifications of the Food Chemicals Codex, 3d Ed. (1981), p. 52, which is incorporated by reference. Copies are available from the National Academy Press, 2101 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20418, or available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .*
( c ) In accordance with § 184.1(b)(1), the ingredient is used in food with no limitation other than current good manufacturing practice.
( d ) Prior sanctions for this ingredient different from the uses established in this section do not exist or have been waived.
[49 FR 26714, June 29, 1984]
**EXHIBIT 23.2** **Consent    of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration    statements on    Form S-8    (File    No. 33-73044,No. 33-58037,No. 333-33433    and    No. 333-34549)    and in the registration statement on    Form S-4(No. 35-65229)    of our report dated March 31, 2007, on our audit of the    consolidated financial statements of Bell Industries, Inc. as of    December 31, 2006 and for year then ended, which report is    included in the Company’s Annual Report on    Form 10-K    for the year ended December 31, 2007.     /s/ BKD, LLP     Indianapolis, Indiana    April 14, 2008
[No. 40151-3-I.

Division One.

December 22, 1997.]

#### Rosalynne Stampfes, *Appellant,*v. Action Appraisers, et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 94-2-08632-2, Kathryn E. Trumbull, J., entered January 24, 1997. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Coleman, J., concurred in by Baker, C.J., and Cox, J.
#### The People of the State of New York Plaintiff, v Robert Shedrick and Wanda Shedrick Defendants.

Motion for change of venue denied. Memorandum: We conclude that defendants have not on this application met their burden of demonstrating that there is "reasonable cause to believe that a fair and impartial trial cannot be had” in Steuben County (CPL 230.20, subd 2). If it develops during the *voir dire*that a fair and impartial jury cannot be drawn, an appropriate application may then be made. The relief requested in the application before us now is premature. (See *People v Di Piazza,*24 NY2d 342; *People v Hatch,*46 AD2d 721; *People v Sekou,*45 AD2d 982, app dsmd 35 NY2d 844.) The trial should be held in a courthouse other than the one at Bath. Present—Dillon, P. J., Cardamone, Hancock, Jr., Callahan and Moule, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,I, David Thompson, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer, certify that:1. To my knowledge, this report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2. To my knowledge, the information in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of International Absorbents Inc. as of April 30,2007.        Date: June 13, 2007 /s/  DAVID THOMPSON    David Thompson   *Secretary and Chief Financial Officer*
###### Editorial Note on Part 173

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 173 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; and 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

#### § 173.322 Chemicals used in delinting cottonseed.

Chemicals may be safely used to assist in the delinting of cottonseed in accordance with the following conditions:

(a) The chemicals consist of one or more of the following:

(1) Substances generally recognized as safe for direct addition to food.

(2) Substances identified in this paragraph and subject to such limitations as are provided:

| Substances | Limitations |
| --- | --- |
| *alpha*-Alkyl-*omega*-hydroxypoly-(oxyethylene) produced by condensation of a linear primary alcohol containing an average chain length of 10 carbons with poly(oxyethylene) having an average of 5 ethylene oxide units | May be used at an application rate not to exceed 0.3 percent by weight of cottonseeds to enhance delinting of cottonseeds intended for the production of cottonseed oil. Byproducts including lint, hulls, and meal may be used in animal feed. |
| An alkanomide produced by condensation of coconut oil fatty acids and diethanolamine, CAS Reg. No. 068603-42-9 | May be used at an application rate not to exceed 0.2 percent by weight of cottonseeds to enhance delinting of cottonseeds intended for the production of cottonseed oil. Byproducts including lint, hulls, and meal may be used in animal feed. |

[47 FR 8346, Feb. 26, 1982]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997             SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           1,332                     737
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,588                  28,257
<ALLOWANCES>                                       925                     615
<INVENTORY>                                      6,564                  16,302
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,166                  46,025
<PP&E>                                           7,925                   8,845
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,255                   1,569
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  40,995                  70,243
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,958                  19,105
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,341                     500
<COMMON>                                        42,393                  39,217
<OTHER-SE>                                    (14,664)                  10,794
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    40,995                  50,511
<SALES>                                         36,475                  61,606
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,475                  61,606
<CGS>                                           26,656                  42,712
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,656                  42,712
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                26,878                  14,090
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   361                     354
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 231                   (140)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (17,290)                   4,944
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (595)                   1,874
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (16,695)                   3,070
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (16,695)                   3,070
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.51)                    0.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.51)                    0.27
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 175
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 175 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; and 70 FR 72074, Dec. 1, 2005.

§ 175.260 Partial phosphoric acid esters of polyester resins. Partial phosphoric acid esters of polyester resins identified in this section and applied on aluminum may be safely used as food-contact coatings, in accordance with the following prescribed conditions: ( a ) For the purpose of this section, partial phosphoric acid esters of polyester resins are prepared by the reaction of trimellitic anhydride with 2,2-dimethyl-1,3-propanediol followed by reaction of the resin thus produced with phosphoric acid anhydride to produce a resin having an acid number of 81 to 98 and a phosphorus content of 4.05 to 4.65 percent by weight.
( b ) The coating is chemically bonded to the metal and cured at temperatures exceeding 450 °F.
( c ) The finished food-contact coating, when extracted with the solvent or solvents characterizing the type of food and under the conditions of time and temperature characterizing the conditions of its intended use, as determined from tables 1 and 2 of § 175.300(d), yields total extractives in each extracting solvent not to exceed 0.3 milligrams per square inch of food-contact surface, as determined by the methods described in § 175.300(e), and the coating yields 2,2-dimethyl-1,3-propanediol in each extracting solvent not to exceed 0.3 micrograms per square inch of food-contact surface. In testing the finished food-contact articles, a separate test sample is to be used for each required extracting solvent.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**370 KA 10-01055**  PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, CARNI, GREEN, AND GORSKI, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V ORDER
RONNIE A. KOONCE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

DAVID J. FARRUGIA, PUBLIC DEFENDER, LOCKPORT (MARY-JEAN BOWMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
MICHAEL J. VIOLANTE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LOCKPORT (THOMAS H. BRANDT OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Niagara County Court (Sara S. Sperrazza, J.), rendered March 22, 2010. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed ( see People v Griffin , 239 AD2d 936).

Entered: March 25, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      Exhibit 12

               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                      GULF STATES STEEL, INC. OF ALABAMA
                            (dollars in thousands)

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                                         
                                              (Successor)                                     (Predecessor)
                                  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           For the Period     For the Period
                                   Fiscal Year Ended       April 21, 1995      Nov. 1, 1994       Fiscal Year Ended
                                       October 31,          to October 31,      to April 20,         October 31,
                                  ----------------------------------------   ----------------   -------------------
                                   1997          1996           1995              1995            1994        1993
                                   ----          ----           ----              ----            -----       ----
<S>                               <C>           <C>            <C>              <C>            <C>         <C> 
  Net interest expense (a)        $26,665       $24,118        $12,406          $ 5,230        $14,349     $14,998
  Amortization expense (a)          1,525         1,663            618              415            706         956
                                  -------       -------        -------          -------        -------     -------
  Fixed charges                   $28,190       $25,781        $13,024          $ 5,645        $15,055     $15,954
                                  =======       =======        =======          =======        =======     =======
  Calculation of fixed charges:
  Fixed charges                   $28,190       $25,781        $13,024          $ 5,645        $15,055     $15,954
  Net income (loss) before        (16,611)         (640)         2,155           19,928         33,375      (4,945)
                                  -------       -------        -------          -------        -------     -------
  Earnings                        $11,579       $25,141        $15,179          $25,573        $48,430     $11,009
                                  =======       =======        =======          =======        =======     =======
 Ratio of earnings to fixed       
      charges                       (b)           (b)           1.2x              4.5x           3.2x        (b)
                                    ===           ===           ====              ====           ====        === 
</TABLE> 

   (a) Interest expense has been reduced by the amount of amortization of debt
   discount and that amount is included in amortization expense.

   (b) Earnings are inadequate to cover fixed charges in 1997, 1996 and 1993 by
   $16,611, $640 and $4,945, respectively.

                                                                               1
38506.

#### BELL, Assignee v. KLEINBERG.

Decided October 20, 1960.

*Chas. C.*Martin, for plaintiff in error.

*Lewis, Wylly & Javetz,*contra.

*624Felton, Chief Judge.

If the three parties signing the note were true comakers and not accommodation makers the court was correct in his judgment because the instrument was discharged when one or more comakers paid it, and the right to sue for contribution would arise by an implied contract of law to reimburse, and the statute would be four years. *Sherling v. Long,*122 Ga. 797 (50 S. E. 935); *Porter v. Ingram,*47 Ga. App. 266 (1) (170 S. E. 299) and cases cited; *Black v. Davidson,*65 Ga. App. 780 (2) (16 S. E. 2d 525).

Since the enactment in Georgia of the Negotiable Instruments Law an accommodation party is no longer a surety for the accommodated as a legal consequence of the accommodation undertaking. The rule now is that the fact of suretyship must be written in the indorsement or there must be an express agreement that the accommodation party is signing as surety. *Cantrell v. Byars,*66 Ga. App. 672 (19 S. E. 2d 44); *Pitman v. Pitman,*215 Ga. 585 (111 S. E. 2d 721) and cases cited on page 589. The ruling in *Hull v. Myers,*90 Ga. 674 (16 S. E. 653), and other cases adopting the ruling to the effect that an action by an accommodation party against another for contribution could be brought on the instrument as well as on the basis of an implied contract to reimburse is no longer the law. This ruling means that the right to sue for contribution is not derived from the negotiable instrument contract but is derived from the Code section subrogating a surety to the rights of the obligee under the contract in which the relationship of principal and surety existed. Since under the Negotiable Instruments Law, where the accommodating party is not a surety, but a mere accommodation party, the right to contribution can rest solely on the implied contract for contribution for the reason that there is nothing in the Negotiable Instruments Law which expressly or impliedly provides for a right of contribution on the part of an accommodation party who pays more than his share, so the old cases no longer control. *Reed v. Liberty Nat. Bank &c. Co.,*44 Ga. App. 544 (162 S. E. 154), concurred in by two judges, will not be followed. While the authorities are in conflict on this question in other jurisdictions the majority view is in accord with our conclusion if not always with our reason*625ing. 140 A. L. R. 889. Such cases as *Pitman v. Pitman,*215 Ga. 585, supra, are not authority to the contrary because in those cases the action is not for contribution but one against parties liable, primarily and secondarily, by one who paid the amount due on the instrument to the payee. Such an action is on the instrument, in which case the statute of limitation is determined by the face of the instrument.

The court did not err in sustaining the demurrer setting up the statute of limitation.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Nichols and Bell, JJ., concur.*
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2012-0703 Directorate ID: 2010-SW-019-AD

Helicopter Model: PZL Swidnik S.A. (PZL) Model PZL W-3A Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 0 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: These actions of this AD are intended to prevent rotation of the collector, which could 

lead to restricted cyclic control stick movement, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $

Labor per Helicopter

(X x $85/work-hour for the 

inspection)

$

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $

Total US Fleet Cost $0

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Gary Roach