alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 37 (Thursday, February 25, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8649-8650]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3793]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration


Evaluation of State Coastal Management Programs and National 
Estuarine Research Reserves

AGENCY: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Office 
of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, National Ocean Service, 
Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of intent to evaluate--rescheduled site visit and public 
meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The NOAA Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management 
(OCRM) announces a rescheduled site visit and time for a public meeting 
previously included in an announcement of intent to evaluate the 
performance of the Rhode Island Coastal Management Program. Notice was 
previously given in the Federal Register on Monday, December 7, 2009, 
of the date of the site visit for the evaluation of the Rhode Island 
Coastal Management Program and the date, local time, and location of 
the public meeting. Notice is hereby given of the rescheduled date for 
the site visit and local time of the public meeting during the site 
visit.

Date and Time: The Rhode Island Coastal Management Program evaluation 
site visit will be held February 22-26, 2010. One public meeting will 
be held during the week. The public meeting will be held on Wednesday, 
February 24, 2010, at 6 p.m. in Conference Room A, Department of 
Administration, One Capitol Hill, Providence, Rhode Island.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kate Barba, Chief, National Policy and 
Evaluation Division, Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, 
NOS/NOAA, 1305 East-West Highway, 10th Floor, Silver Spring, Maryland 
20910, (301) 563-1182.


[[Page 8650]]


    Dated: February 16, 2010.
Donna Wieting,
Acting Director, Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, 
National Ocean Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-3793 Filed 2-24-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-08-P
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ARASH ALEX ABBASSI, an individual,

Petitioner,

v. NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD and MICHAEL P. HUERTA, Adm inistrator, Federal Aviation Adm inistration,

Respondents. No. 17-71968 NTSB-1 No. SE-30147
MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the National Transportation Safety Board Subm itted August 29, 2018 * * Pasadena, California Before: WARDLAW, BYBEE, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges. Arash Alex Abbassi appeals a final order of the National Transportation and Safety Board (NTSB) revoking his pilot and flight instructor certificates for 

# FILED
AUG 31 2018 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

* * The panel unanim ously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argum e nt. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).m aking intentionally false statem ents in records used to show com pliance with

aviation certification requirem ents, in violation of 14 C.F.R. § 61.59(a)(2). We have jurisdiction under 49 U.S.C. § 1153(a). The NTSB did not abuse its discretion in concluding that Abbassi’s stam ped entries in his student’s logbook (falsely certifying the student’s flight training)
were m a terial. The NTSB’s conclusion that the stam ped entries “had the natural tendency to influence, or [were] capable of influencing” the Federal Aviation Adm inistration (FAA), Janka v. Dep’t of Transp. , 925 F.2d 1147, 1150 (9th Cir. 1991) (quoting C

assis v. Helms , 737 F.2d 545, 547 (6th Cir. 1984)), was supported by substantial evidence, including the testim ony of FAA expert witness David Voelker. Given Voelker’s testim ony that the NTSB could rely on such false entries for future decisions, as well as evidence that Abbassi had routinely used such stam ped signatures at his flight school, the NTSB could reasonably conclude that the stam

ped entries were m aterial despite the lack of direct evidence that the FAA authorized the use of stam ped signatures. 1

1 The ALJ did not abuse his discretion by excluding the FAA advisory circular on electronic signatures because it was irrelevant to Abbassi’s dispute regarding the FAA’s acceptance of stam ped signatures. See Atlantic-Pacific Const. Co., Inc. v. NLRB , 52 F.3d 260, 263 (9th Cir. 1995) (setting forth the abuse of discretion standard of review). 2Further, the NTSB did not abuse its discretion in concluding that Abbassi’s

hand-signed entry (falsely certifying the student’s aeronautical knowledge and ground training) was m aterial. That finding was also supported by substantial evidence in the record, including Voelker’s testim ony that the FAA could rely on the false entry for future decisions. Additionally, Abbassi’s claim that his student had received the relevant ground training from som eone else is not relevant, as it would not have m ade the endorsem ent less likely to influence the FAA, and thus would not have m ade Abbassi’s endorsem ent less m aterial. See Janka , 925 F.2d at 1150. AFFIRMED.

3
Opinion issued October 7, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-14-00142-CV

———————————

KAREY B. STATIN, Appellant

V.

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 190th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2013-23471

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Karey Bernard Statin attempts to appeal an order granting a lien 

foreclosure application filed by appellee pursuant to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 

736. On April 30, 2014, we sent appellant a notice of intent to dismiss this appeal 

for want of jurisdiction because such orders are not reviewable by appeal. See TEX.
2

R. CIV. P. 736.8(c) (order granting or denying foreclosure application under Texas 

Rule of Civil Procedure 736 “is not subject to a motion for rehearing, new trial, bill 

of review, or appeal.”). We informed appellant that the appeal would be dismissed 

for want of jurisdiction unless he filed a response demonstrating that this Court has 

jurisdiction over this appeal Appellant failed to file an adequate response. 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. CIV.

P. 736.8(c); Thweatt v. Deutsche Bank Nat’l Trust Co., No. 01–14–00261–CV, 

2014 WL 2538691, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] June 5, 2014, no pet.)

(dismissing appeal of Rule 736 order for lack of jurisdiction); Johnson v. 

Residential Funding Real Estate Holdings, LLC, No. 01–10–00287–CV, 2011 WL 

2418516, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] May 26, 2011, no pet.) (same).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Higley, Bland, and Sharp.
[No. 41083-1-I.

Division One.

November 17, 1997.]

#### Lerch Bates & Associates, Inc., *Respondent,*v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, *Petitioner.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 96-2-26866-6, Michael J. Trickey, J., entered May 16, 1997. *Reversed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
EXHIBIT 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the use in this  Amendment  No. 3 to  Registration  Statement  No.
333-95697  of PSEG  Energy  Holdings  Inc.  of our report  dated June 14,  2000,
appearing in the Prospectus, which is a part of this Registration Statement, and
to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such Prospectus.

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Parsippany, New Jersey
June 26, 2000
## OCT 15 2015 Docket Management Facility U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Ave., SE West Building Ground Floor Room W 12-140 Washington, DC 20590 Docket Management Facility 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20229 

### U.S. Customsand Border Protection

United States Customs and Border Protection (CBP), Air and Marine Operations (AMO) is requesting the renewal ofExemption No. 10490, under regulatory Docket No. FAA-2001-9369. The list ofsections are:

• §91.111(b) • §91.117(a), (b) and (c) • §91.119(c) • §91.159(a) • §91.209(a)(l) and (b) 

### Due to thepotentialsensitivity of the material, CBP requests that a summary of thepetition notbepublishedin the FederalRegister due to thepotentialsecurity-sensitivity of the exemption, which the FAA also granted. Justification for this renewal request remains the same as the original request dated 28 November 2011. CBP, Air and Marine Operations continues to conduct border security missions to include, drug trafficking interdiction, and Department ofHomeland Security/National Security missions. The point ofcontact for this request is Joseph Pavero, Domain Operations and Integration. He can be reached at 202-325-3957 and joseph.pavero@dhs.gov. Sincerely,



# ----------- Director, Domain Operations and Integration U.S. Customs and Border Protection 202-344-2889 Richard.Booth@dhs.gov
Exhibit 10.1

 



 

 

	
 
    	
Avery Dennison Corporation
    
	
 
    	
207 Goode Avenue, Suite 500
    
	
 
    	
Glendale, California 91205
    
	
 
    	
Phone 626 304-2000
    
	
 
    	
Fax 626 792-7312
    


 

 

March 20, 2017

 

Greg Lovins

[Address]

[Address]

 

Dear Greg:

 

I am pleased to offer you the position of Vice President & Interim Chief Financial Officer, reporting directly to me. This role will begin on 3/22/17, and will end when a permanent CFO has been designated, signifying the end of the interim assignment.

 

The components of your interim pay package are as follows:

 

Base Salary:  Your annualized rate of pay will remain $424,360, paid semi-monthly and subject to normal tax withholdings.

 

Interim Stipend:  You will be provided a stipend of $10,000 per month during the interim period.  This stipend will be paid semi-monthly via payroll as a separate line item on your paycheck, and will be subject to normal tax withholdings.

 

Annual Incentive Plan (AIP):  Your AIP target will remain at 40% through the interim period.  The interim stipend described above will not be included for purposes of calculating your AIP award.  The AIP, including eligibility criteria, may change at any time, with or without notice, in accordance with applicable law or, if permissible under the law, at the discretion of the Company.

 

One-Time Bonus:  You will be awarded a special, one-time bonus in the amount of $100,000 at the end of the interim period.  This payment will be subject to normal tax withholdings.

 

Housing Support:  During the interim period, the Company will pay up to $4,500 per month for temporary housing for you near the Glendale, California headquarters.  This will be paid directly to the landlord by the company.  This housing support will cease at the end of the interim period.

 

Long-Term Incentive (LTI):  There will be no changes to your long-term incentive eligibility and opportunity during the interim period.  Should the interim period extend beyond 2017, the interim stipend described above will not be included for purposes of calculating your 2018 LTI award.

 

Sincerely,

 

/s/ Mitch Butier

 

Mitch Butier

President and CEO

 











 

cc: Mark Alders

Anne Hill

 

 

Accepted by:    /s/ Greg Lovins

 

 

Date:  March 21, 2017
Exhibit 15.3








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-102288 and 333-92491) pertaining to the Stock Option plans of Ellomay Capital Ltd. and on Form F-3 (File No. 333-144171) of Ellomay Capital Ltd. and in the related Prospectuses of our report dated April 14, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Ellomay Capital Ltd. and its subsidiaries included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012.





Tel Aviv, Israel

March 25, 2013
/s/ Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer

KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERER

A Member of Ernst & Young Global
Editorial Note on Part 172
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 172 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; 70 FR 72074, Dec. 1, 2005; and 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 172.130 Dehydroacetic acid. The food additive dehydroacetic acid and/or its sodium salt may be safely used in accordance with the following prescribed conditions: ( a ) The food additive meets the following specifications: Dehydroacetic acid: Melting point, 109 °C-111 °C; assay, minimum 98 percent (dry basis). Sodium salt of dehydroacetic acid: Assay, minimum 98 percent (dry basis).
( b ) It is used or intended for use as a preservative for cut or peeled squash, and is so used that no more than 65 parts per million expressed as dehydroacetic acid remains in or on the prepared squash.
( c ) The label or labeling of any package of the additive intended for use in food shall bear adequate directions for use to insure compliance with this section.
Meeting attendees: 

[CAMD -- EPA's Clean Air Markets Division] 

Sam Napolitano [CAMD, Division Director] 

Michael Cohen [CAMD, Environmental Scientist] 

Jay Hudson, P.E. [Manager, Environmental Management, Santee Cooper] 

Janet Anderson [Senior Technology and Policy Advisor, VanNess Feldman] 

On May 16, 2011 representatives of Santee Cooper and the Large Public Power Council met with 

representatives of EPA's Clean Air Markets Division (CAMD) between 3:00 and 3:30 EST at EPA's 1310 

L Street offices. At this meeting Santee Cooper and a representative for Santee Cooper and the Large 

Public Power Council went over Santee Cooper's comments on the NODA to the Proposed Transport 

Rule submitted February 4, 2011 and the Large Public Power Council's comments on the Proposed 

Transport Rule submitted October 1, 2010. No new comments were submitted.
# L_2019120DE.01003402.xml

| 8.5.2019 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 120/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2019

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 120/34

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) 2018/2005 der Kommission vom 17. Dezember 2018 zur Änderung des Anhangs XVII der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1907/2006 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates zur Registrierung, Bewertung, Zulassung und Beschränkung chemischer Stoffe (REACH) in Bezug auf Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalat (DEHP), Dibutylphthalat (DBP), Benzylbutylphthalat (BBP) und Diisobutylphthalat (DIBP)

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 322 vom 18. Dezember 2018
  )

Seite 18, Anhang zur Änderung des Eintrags 51 des Anhangs XVII der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1907/2006, Spalte 2 Absatz 2:

Anstatt:

| „2. | Dürfen nicht in Spielzeug und Babyartikeln auf den Markt gebracht werden, wenn die Konzentration eines der in Spalte 1 aufgeführten Phthalate oder einer Kombination daraus mindestens 0,1 Gewichtsprozent des weichmacherhaltigen Materials ausmacht.
  Ferner darf DIPB nach dem 7. Juli 2020 nicht in Spielzeug und Babyartikeln in Verkehr gebracht werden, wenn die Konzentration eines oder mehrerer der in Spalte 1 dieses Eintrags aufgeführten Phthalate mindestens 0,1 Gewichtsprozent des weichmacherhaltigen Materials ausmacht.“ |
| --- | --- |

„2.

Ferner darf DIPB nach dem 7. Juli 2020 nicht in Spielzeug und Babyartikeln in Verkehr gebracht werden, wenn die Konzentration eines oder mehrerer der in Spalte 1 dieses Eintrags aufgeführten Phthalate mindestens 0,1 Gewichtsprozent des weichmacherhaltigen Materials ausmacht.“

muss es heißen:

| „2. | Dürfen nicht in Spielzeug und Babyartikeln in Verkehr gebracht werden, wenn die Konzentration eines der drei ersten der in Spalte 1 aufgeführten Phthalate oder einer Kombination daraus mindestens 0,1 Gewichtsprozent des weichmacherhaltigen Materials ausmacht.
  Ferner darf DIBP nach dem 7. Juli 2020 nicht in Spielzeug und Babyartikeln in Verkehr gebracht werden, wenn seine Konzentration einzeln oder in einer Kombination mit den drei ersten der in Spalte 1 dieses Eintrags aufgeführten Phthalate mindestens 0,1 Gewichtsprozent des weichmacherhaltigen Materials ausmacht.“ |
| --- | --- |

„2.

Ferner darf DIBP nach dem 7. Juli 2020 nicht in Spielzeug und Babyartikeln in Verkehr gebracht werden, wenn seine Konzentration einzeln oder in einer Kombination mit den drei ersten der in Spalte 1 dieses Eintrags aufgeführten Phthalate mindestens 0,1 Gewichtsprozent des weichmacherhaltigen Materials ausmacht.“

---
Editorial Note on Part 25
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 25 appear at 88 FR 45065, July 14, 2023.

§ 25.60 Environmental effects abroad of major agency actions. ( a ) In accordance with Executive Order 12114, “Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions” of January 4, 1979 (44 FR 1957, January 9, 1979), the responsible agency official, in analyzing actions under his or her program, shall consider the environmental effects abroad, including whether the actions involve: ( 1 ) Potential environmental effects on the global commons and areas outside the jurisdiction of any nation, e.g., oceans and the upper atmosphere.
( 2 ) Potential environmental effects on a foreign nation not participating with or otherwise involved in an FDA activity.
( 3 ) The export of products (or emissions) that in the United States are prohibited or strictly regulated because their effects on the environment create a serious public health risk.
( 4 ) Potential environmental effects on natural and ecological resources of global importance designated under the Executive Order.
( b ) Before deciding on any action falling into the categories specified in paragraph (a) of this section, the responsible agency official shall determine, in accordance with section 2-3 of the Executive Order, whether such actions may have a significant environmental effect abroad.
( c ) If the responsible agency official determines that an action may have a significant environmental effect abroad, the responsible agency official shall determine, in accordance with section 2-4 (a) and (b) of the Executive Order, whether the subject action calls for: ( 1 ) An EIS;
( 2 ) A bilateral or multilateral environmental study; or
( 3 ) A concise environmental review.
( d ) In preparing environmental documents under this subpart, the responsible official shall: ( 1 ) Determine, as provided in section 2-5 of the Executive Order, whether proposed actions are subject to the exemptions, exclusions, and modification in contents, timing, and availability of documents.
( 2 ) Coordinate all communications with foreign governments concerning environmental agreements and other arrangements in implementing the Executive Order.
### Floods of May 1955 in Colorado and New Mexico

By: Walter C. Vaudrey

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1455A

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
================================================================================

[PORTIONS OF THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN REDACTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION.]

                                  APPENDIX A-8

                                    PRODUCTS


Product Name:     Denise Austin Pilates  - AB-108N

Product Description: Yoga Trainer Product

Projected Units Sold next 24 months: XXXXXX

Manufacturer:     CirTran-Asia

Sub-Manufacturer: Zhejiang Hengtai Machinary Manufacturing Co., Ltd

Marketing Partner Contact Info:     Tri-Star


Current Sale Price: $XXXXXX USD - CIRTRAN-ASIA

Current Cost to Manufacturer:       $XXXXXX USD

Total Tooling/Development Costs:    $20,000 USD

Gross Profit Margin Per Unit - $1.25

CirTran-Asia               $ 0.30 USD
Charles Ho                 $ 0.95 USD

 Denise Austin Pilates Stock Option Schedule

Upon full execution of this Agreement, Cirtran's parent CirTran Corporation will
issue the following options to purchase restricted common stock:

                    Charles Ho                500,000 shares

These initial options will vest and be exercisable only after Cirtran has sold
200,000 Denise Austin Pilates units. The options will be exercisable at $.06 per
share after vesting. The options will expire and will no longer be exercisable
on the date one year after the date hereof.

In addition, for each whole multiple of 100,000 Denise Austin Pilates units sold
by Cirtran during the first 24 months of this Agreement in excess of the initial
200,000 units, CirTran Corporation will grant Charles Ho an option to purchase
100,000 shares. Each such additional option will be exercisable for a period of
12 months at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of CirTran
Corporation stock on the date of grant (i.e. the mean between the high bid and
low asked prices for the stock for the date of determination).



As a condition to grant of the options, each option holder will be required to
make standard investment representations to CirTran Corporation.

[XXXXX - REDACTED PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION.]


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
###### Editorial Note on Part 172

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 172 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; 70 FR 72074, Dec. 1, 2005; and 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

#### § 172.890 Rice bran wax.

Rice bran wax may be safely used in food in accordance with the following conditions:

(a) It is the refined wax obtained from rice bran and meets the following specifications:

Melting point 75 °C to 80 °C.

Free fatty acids, maximum 10 percent.

Iodine number, maximum 20.

Saponification number 75 to 120.

(b) It is used or intended for use as follows:

| Food | Limitation in food | Use |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Candy | 50 p.p.m | Coating. |
| Fresh fruits and fresh vegetables | ......do | Do. |
| Chewing gum | 21/2 pct | Plasticizing material. |
###### Editorial Note on Part 1315

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part appear at 82 FR 97041, Dec. 30, 2016.

#### § 1315.27 Abandonment of quota.

Any manufacturer assigned an individual manufacturing quota for a chemical pursuant to § 1315.23 may at any time abandon their right to manufacture all or any part of such quota by filing a notice of such abandonment with the UN Reporting and Quota Section, Diversion Control Division, Drug Enforcement Administration in the online Quota Management System. The Administrator may, in his discretion, allocate the amount among the other manufacturers in proportion to their respective quotas.

[72 FR 37448, July 10, 2007, as amended at 88 FR 60143, Aug. 31, 2023]