alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1401.13 Fees to be charged—categories of requesters. ( a ) There are three categories of FOIA requesters: Commercial use requests; educational, non-commercial scientific institutions or representatives of the news media; and all other requesters.
( b ) The specific levels of fees for each of these categories are: ( 1 ) *Commercial use request.* ONDCP will recover the full direct cost of providing search, review and duplication services. Commercial use requests will not receive free search-time or free reproduction of documents.
( 2 ) *Educational and non-commercial scientific institution request.* ONDCP will charge the cost of reproduction, excluding charges for the first 100 pages. Requesters must demonstrate the request is authorized by and under the auspices of a qualifying institution and that the records are sought for scholarly or scientific research not a commercial use.
( 3 ) *Request from representative of the news media.* ONDCP will charge the cost of reproduction, excluding charges for the first 100 pages. Requesters must meet the criteria in § 1401.3, and the request must not be made for a commercial use. A request that supports the news dissemination function of the requester shall not be considered a commercial use.
( 4 ) *All other requesters.* ONDCP will recover the full direct cost of the search and the reproduction of records, excluding the first 100 pages of reproduction and the first two hours of search time.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                              LEVEL 8 SYSTEMS, INC.
              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES BY JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION


All Companies are 100% owned unless otherwise noted.

Australia:

     Level 8 Systems Australia Pty Limited (This subsidiary is in the process of
being closed.)

Barbados:

     Level 8 FSC, Inc.

Benelux:

     Level 8 Benelux B.V.

Canada:

     Level 8 Canada, Inc.
          Domestic Province:           Ontario

     3020126 Canada Inc.
          Domestic Province:           Canada

Denmark:

     Level 8 Denmark ApS (This subsidiary is in the process of being dissolved).

France:

     Level 8 France S.A.R.L.

     Template Software S.A.

Germany:

     Level 8 Europe (Deutschland) GmbH

     Template Software GmbH (This subsidiary is in the process of being
dissolved).

     Template Software Holding GmbH (This subsidiary is in the process of being
dissolved).

     Template Software Geschaftsfuhrungs GmbH (This subsidiary is in the process
of being dissolved).

Ireland:

<PAGE>

     Level 8 Ireland Limited

Italy:

     Level 8 Italia S.r.L.

Mexico:

     Template Software de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. (This office is in the process of
being closed.)

Korea:

     Seer Korea Co., Limited (This office is in the process of being closed.)

Sweden:

     Level 8 Systems Nordic AB ((This office is in the process of being closed.)

Switzerland:

     Milestone Software AG (20% owned)

United Kingdom:

     Level 8 Systems (U.K.) Limited

     Template Software, UK Limited

United States:

Parent Company:

   Level 8 Systems, Inc.
     State of Incorporation:               Delaware

Subsidiary:

     Level 8 Technologies, Inc.
          State of Incorporation:          New York

     StarQuest Software, Inc.
          State of Incorporation:          California

     Level 8 Worldwide Holdings Limited
          State of Incorporation:          Delaware

     Cicero Technologies, Inc.
          State of Incorporation:          Delaware

     Template Technologies, Inc.
          State of Incorporation:          Delaware
================================================================================

[PORTIONS OF THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN REDACTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION.]

                                  APPENDIX A-3

                                    PRODUCTS


Product Name:     AB TRAINER CLUB PRO - AT-152

Product Description: Fitness Machine to exercise abdominal muscles

Projected Units Sold next 24 months: XXXXXX

Manufacturer:     CirTran-Asia

Sub-Manufacturer: Zhejiang Hengtai Machinary Manufacturing Co., Ltd

Marketing Partner Contact Info:     Tri-Star


Current Sale Price: $XXXXXX USD - CIRTRAN-ASIA

Current Cost to Manufacturer:       $ XXXXXX

Total Tooling/Development Costs:    $ 10,000

Gross Profit Margin Per Unit - $3.50

CirTran-Asia               $1.25 USD
Charles Ho                 $2.25 USD

INSTANT ABS Stock Option Schedule

Upon full execution of this Agreement, Cirtran's parent CirTran Corporation will
issue the following options to purchase restricted common stock:

                      Charles Ho                500,000 shares

These initial options will vest and be exercisable only after Cirtran has sold
25,000 AB TRAINER CLUB PRO units. The options will be exercisable at $.06 per
share after vesting. The options will expire and will no longer be exercisable
on the date one year after the date hereof.

In addition, for each whole multiple of 15,000 AB TRAINER CLUB PRO units sold by
Cirtran during the first 24 months of this Agreement in excess of the initial
25,000 units, CirTran Corporation will grant Charles Ho an option to purchase
100,000 shares. Each such additional option will be exercisable for a period of
12 months at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of CirTran
Corporation stock on the date of grant (i.e. the mean between the high bid and
low asked prices for the stock for the date of determination).



As a condition to grant of the options, each option holder will be required to
make standard investment representations to CirTran Corporation.

[XXXXX - REDACTED PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT AND FILED
SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION.]


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
38536.

#### SUMMEROUR v. BURT.

Carlisle, Judge.

1. The sole assignment of error in this case is on the judgment of the trial court overruling the general demurrer to the amended petition. Accordingly, no question is presented for this court as to whether the amendment allowed by the court added a new and different cause of action. Such question may only be raised by special demurrer and is not presented by a general demurrer to the amended petition. *Aycock v. Williams,*185 Ga. 585 (1) (196 S. E. 54).

2. The petition alleged that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff upon an open account in a stated sum, a copy of which is attached and marked “Exhibit A”; that the defendant was a stockholder and an officer in a named trucking corporation and that he brought a certain truck belonging to the corporation to the repair shop of the petitioner for repairs; that at the time he brought the truck in and before the plaintiff commenced work on it the defendant stated to the plaintiff that he would be dealing with the defendant individually with respect to the payment of the repair bill and not with the trucking company and that he (the defendant) would see that the bill for repairs Was paid and that, although the account was billed in the name of the trucking company, before the work was done credit was given exclusively to the defendant based on his promise as an individual to pay the account. The fact that “Exhibit A,” a copy of a bill or statement for repairs, was made out in the name of the trucking company, would not, in view of the other allegations set forth in explanation thereof, render the petition subject to general demurrer. The allegations show an original undertaking on the part of the named defendant to pay the bill, and do not show any intention that the trucking company would be liable therefor. Such allegations do not bring the case within the statute of frauds *(Code*§ 20-401 (2)), and the trial judge did not err in overruling the general demurrer thereto. *Buchanan v. Sterling,*63 Ga. 227 (4); *Baldwin v. Hiers,*73 Ga. 739; *Maddox v. Pierce,**68874 Ga. 838; *Cruse v. Foster & Estes,*76 Ga. 723; *Ellis v. Murray & Word,*77 Ga. 542; *Crowder v. Keys,*91 Ga. 180 (16 S. E. 986); *Holcomb v. Mashburn,*10 Ga. App. 781 (74 S. E. 307); *Cordray v. James,*19 Ga. App. 156 (1) (91 S. E. 239); *Trapnell v. Bird,*21 Ga. App. 21 (2) (93 S. E. 498); *Easterling v. Bell,*29 Ga. App. 465 (1) (116 S. E. 50).

Decided November 15, 1960.

*George M. MacNider, Walton Hardin,*for plaintiff in error.

*Colley & Orr, Wilbur A. Orr, Jr.,*contra.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Townsend, P. J., Frankum and Jordan, JJ., concur.*
# L_2019010EN.01007401.xml

| 14.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 10/74 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 10/74

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) 2019/55

of 10 January 2019

correcting the Bulgarian and French language versions of Decision 2004/558/EC implementing Council Directive 64/432/EEC as regards additional guarantees for intra-Community trade in bovine animals relating to infectious bovine rhinotracheitis and the approval of the eradication programmes presented by certain Member States

(notified under document C(2019) 8)

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Directive 64/432/EEC of 26 June 1964 on animal health problems affecting intra-Community trade in bovine animals and swine (1), and in particular Articles 9(2) and 10(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The Bulgarian and French language versions of Commission Decision 2004/558/EC (2) contain an error in Article 3(1)(b). The Bulgarian and French versions refer to blood samples from bovine animals for breeding and production to be taken less than 21 days after their arrival at the isolation facility, whereas the correct guarantee for blood samples to be taken is not earlier than 21 days after their arrival at the isolation facility. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The Bulgarian and French language versions of Commission Decision 2004/558/EC (2) contain an error in Article 3(1)(b). The Bulgarian and French versions refer to blood samples from bovine animals for breeding and production to be taken less than 21 days after their arrival at the isolation facility, whereas the correct guarantee for blood samples to be taken is not earlier than 21 days after their arrival at the isolation facility.

| (2) | The Bulgarian and French language versions of Decision 2004/558/EC should therefore be corrected accordingly. The other language versions are not affected. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Bulgarian and French language versions of Decision 2004/558/EC should therefore be corrected accordingly. The other language versions are not affected.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

(does not concern the English language)

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 January 2019.

For the Commission

Günther OETTINGER

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ 121, 29.7.1964, p. 1977.

1

(2)  Commission Decision 2004/558/EC of 15 July 2004 implementing Council Directive 64/432/EEC as regards additional guarantees for intra-Community trade in bovine animals relating to infectious bovine rhinotracheitis and the approval of the eradication programmes presented by certain Member States (OJ L 249, 23.7.2004, p. 20).

2

---
§ 182.6197 Calcium diacetate. ( a ) *Product.* Calcium diacetate.
( b ) *Conditions of use.* This substance is generally recognized as safe when used in accordance with good manufacturing practice.
# L_2019068EN.01001401.xml

| 8.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 68/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 68/14

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2019/377

of 5 March 2019

appointing a member and an alternate member, proposed by Hungary, of the Committee of the Regions

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Hungarian Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 26 January 2015, 5 February 2015 and 23 June 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU) 2015/116 (1), (EU) 2015/190 (2) and (EU)2015/994 (3) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 26 January 2015, 5 February 2015 and 23 June 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU) 2015/116 (1), (EU) 2015/190 (2) and (EU)2015/994 (3) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020.

| (2) | A member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr László Lóránt DR. KERESZTES. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr László Lóránt DR. KERESZTES.

| (3) | An alternate member's seat has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Sándor KOVÁCS, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

An alternate member's seat has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Sándor KOVÁCS,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following are hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2020:

| (a) | as a member:






  — | Mr József KÓBOR, Representative of Local Government of Pécs with county rights; |
| --- | --- | --- |

(a)

as a member:

—

Mr József KÓBOR, Representative of Local Government of Pécs with county rights;

and

| (b) | as an alternate member:






  — | Mr Nándor SKUCZI, Chair of the Municipality of Nógrád County. |
| --- | --- | --- |

(b)

as an alternate member:

—

Mr Nándor SKUCZI, Chair of the Municipality of Nógrád County.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 5 March 2019.

For the Council

The President

G.L. GAVRILESCU

---

(1)  Council Decision (EU) 2015/116 of 26 January 2015 appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020 (OJ L 20, 27.1.2015, p. 42).

1

(2)  Council Decision (EU) 2015/190 of 5 February 2015 appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020 (OJ L 31, 7.2.2015, p. 25).

2

(3)  Council Decision (EU) 2015/994 of 23 June 2015 appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020 (OJ L 159, 25.6.2015, p. 70).

3

---
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

I, John Low, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of Spescom Software Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, thisquarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in thisquarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

 

a) designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;

 

b) evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisquarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

 

c) disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

 

a) all significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Dated:   August 12, 2004 |
|-------------------------------|
|                          |
|  /s/  John Low           |   |
| John Low                      |
| Chief  Financial Officer      |

 

----
#### § 200.11 Use of octadecylamine in steam lines of drug establishments.

The Food and Drug Administration will not object to the use of octadecylamine in steam lines where the steam may be used for autoclaving surgical instruments and gauze if the octadecylamine in the steam is not more than 2.4 parts per million.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Annual Report of LMIC, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Luis P. Negrete,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

              (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

              (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



                                        /s/ Luis P. Negrete
                                        -----------------------------------
                                        Luis P. Negrete
                                        Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                                        Financial Officer
                                        April 14, 2004
Exhibit 10.1


SECOND AMENDMENT

OF

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT OF PATRICK J. MOORE


This Amendment Agreement (the “Amendment”) is
effective as of July 25, 2006 (the “Amendment Date”), as to the Employment
Agreement (“the Agreement”) by and between Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation
(the “Company”) and Patrick J. Moore (the “Executive”).


WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive entered into an
Employment Agreement effective as of April 1, 1999, and amended as of January
4, 2002, (the “Employment Agreement”); and


WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive now desire to
amend the Employment Agreement to reflect certain revised terms and conditions
of his employment;


NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the mutual terms, covenants and conditions stated in this
Amendment, the Company and the Executive hereby agree to amend the Employment
Agreement, effective as of July 25, 2006, as follows:


1.      By
substituting the title “Chairman and Chief Executive Officer” following for the
title “President and Chief Executive Officer” each place where the latter title
appears in the Employment Agreement.


2.      By
deleting Section 6(e) of the Employment Agreement in its entirety.


3.      By
substituting the following for Section 7(f) of the Employment Agreement:


(f)   Non-Competition.   The
Executive agrees that so long as he is employed by the Company and for a period
of two (2) years thereafter (the “Period”), he shall not, without the prior
written consent of the Company, participate or engage in, directly or
indirectly (as an owner, partner, employee, officer, director, independent
contractor, consultant, advisor or in any other capacity calling for the
rendition of services, advice, or acts of management, operation or control),
any business that, during the Period, is competitive with the Business Conducted
by the Company or any of its Affiliates within the United States, Canada,
Mexico, and China (hereinafter, the “Geographic Area”) and which business the
Company was engaged (either actively as a going concern or in the process of
developing to market) within the preceding two years of the Executive’s
employment with the Company.









 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this
Amendment effective as of the date first above written.


	
  

  	
   

  	
  SMURFIT-STONE CONTAINER CORPORATION

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ Patrick J.
  Moore

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/Craig A. Hunt

  
	
  Patrick J. Moore

  	
   

  	
  Its:

  	
  Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
IN TH E DIS TRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF TH E STA T E OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED D ANNY DEAN ALLEN , P etitioner ,
v. Case No. 5D22

- 1007 LT Case No. 2014

- CF

- 001245

S TA TE OF FLORIDA , R espondent

. ________________________________/ O pinion filed June 24, 2022 Petition for Belated Appeal A Case of Original Jurisdiction.
Da nny Dean Allen , East Palatka , pro se

. Ashley Moody , A ttorne y General Tallahassee, and, Rebecca Rock M c Gui gan , A s sistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent

. PER CURIAM.
T he petiti on for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opini on shall
be filed with the trial co urt and be treated as the no tice of appea l f rom t he2 January 20, 2022 order denying the motion for pos t conviction relief filed in Case 2014

- CF

- 001245 , Putnam County, Florida. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)( 6 )(D).

P ETITION GRANTED

.

ED WARDS , SASSO and WOZNIAK, JJ., concu r.