alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1041 

For the relief of Alfredo Plascencia Lopez and Maria Del Refugio Plascencia. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 16, 2005 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

For the relief of Alfredo Plascencia Lopez and Maria Del 

Refugio Plascencia.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR ALFREDO 

4 PLASCENCIA LOPEZ AND MARIA DEL 

5 REFUGIO PLASCENCIA. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

7 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

8 Act, Alfredo Plascencia Lopez and Maria Del Refugio 

9 Plascencia shall each be eligible for the issuance of an im10 migrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an alien 

11 lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon filing an 
2

•S 1041 IS

1 application for issuance of an immigrant visa under sec2 tion 204 of that Act or for adjustment of status to lawful 

3 permanent resident. 

4 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Alfredo Plascencia 

5 Lopez and Maria Del Refugio Plascencia enter the United 

6 States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), 

7 Alfredo Plascencia Lopez and Maria Del Refugio 

8 Plascencia shall be considered to have entered and re9 mained lawfully and shall be eligible for adjustment of sta10 tus under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality 

11 Act as of the date of enactment of this Act. 

12 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

13 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap14 plication for issuance of immigrant visas or the application 

15 for adjustment of status are filed with appropriate fees 

16 within 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act. 

17 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBERS.—

18 Upon the granting of immigrant visas or permanent resi19 dence to Alfredo Plascencia Lopez and Maria Del Refugio 

20 Plascencia, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper 

21 officer to reduce by 2, during the current or next following 

22 fiscal year, the total number of immigrant visas that are 

23 made available to natives of the country of the aliens’ birth 

24 under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality 

25 Act or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas 
3

•S 1041 IS

1 that are made available to natives of the country of the 

2 aliens’ birth under section 202(e) of that Act.

Æ
13 Weeks Ended         39 Weeks Ended
                                     --------------         --------------
                              Oct 31, 1998 Nov 1, 1997  Oct 31, 1998 Nov 1, 1997
                              ------------ -----------  ------------ -----------
The computation of net (loss)
  available & adjusted shares
  outstanding follows:
Net income (loss)                $  2,251    $  1,607      $ (4,365)   $ (3,923)
Less: Preferred stock dividends  $ (1,644)   $ (1,536)     $ (4,803)   $ (4,556)
                                 ---------   ---------     ---------   ---------
Net (loss) used for basic and    
        diluted computation         $ 607        $ 71      $ (9,168)   $ (8,479)
                                 =========   =========     =========   =========

Weighted average number of
  common shares outstanding     1,507,892   1,485,292     1,500,524   1,474,102

Basic:
Net income (loss) applicable to
 common stock per common & common
 share equivalent                  $ 0.40      $ 0.05       $ (6.11)    $ (5.75)

Add:
 Assumed exercise of those options
 that are common stock equivalents 12,305           -             -           -
 Assumed exercise of convertible
    preferred stock:
       Series A Preferred       2,807,999           -             -           -
       Series B Preferred       5,633,754           -             -           -
                                ---------   ---------     ---------   ----------
Adjusted shares outstanding,
 used for diluted computation   9,961,951   1,485,292     1,500,524   1,474,102
                                =========   =========     =========   ==========
Diluted:
Net income (loss) applicable to
 common stock per common &
 common share equivalent           $ 0.23      $ 0.05       $ (6.11)    $ (5.75)
                                =========   =========     ==========  ==========
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding  restated for reverse stock
split (factor is .30133) effective November 25, 1998.
#### Commonwealth v. Saunders

*486*Stroud Weber,*district attorney, for Commonwealth.

*Robert T. Potts,*for defendant.

March 6, 1951.

Knight, P. J.,

— The petition avers that petitioner, as agent for Peerless Casualty Company of Keene, N. H., entered a bail bond for one James Saunders, charged with fornication and bastardy; that James Saunders appeared on November 5, 1945, which was the beginning of the next term of court after entering the bail, and that David Groshens, assistant district attorney, informed the court that the case would be nolle prossed upon the payment of costs as the child had been still born.

James Saunders was allowed to leave court, but apparently the costs were not paid.

The district attorney has filed an answer, in which he neither admits or denies the averments of the petition, but demands proof.

As the truth or falsity of the facts averred in the petition are within the knowledge of the district attorney, or could be easily ascertained by him, we must hold the answer insufficient, and the facts averred in the petition admitted.

The bond was entered by petitioner on October 6, 1945, in the sum of $1,500, and was conditioned that the “above bounden James Saunders shall be and appear at the next succeeding court of Oyer and Terminer and General Jail Delivery and Court of Quarter Sessions of the Peace, after the next meeting of a Grand Jury, to be holden in and for the County of Montgomery at Norristown, and there answer such charges as *487may be preferred against him and to abide and not depart said court without leave, then this obligation to be void, otherwise to be and remain in full force and virtue”.

Defendant, James Saunders, performed the condition of the bond by appearing in court and not departing without leave.

The bond was not given for the payment of costs, and the liability of the bail could not be enlarged to cover costs without its express consent and this is not alleged.

We have therefore come to the conclusion that the rule must be made absolute. Other courts have taken the same view. (See Keefhaver v. Commonwealth, 2 P. *&*W. (1830); Commonwealth v. Angle, 20 D. *&*C. 491 (1934), and Commonwealth v. Somers, 14 Pa. C. C. 159).

And now, March 6,1951, the rule is made absolute, and the clerk of the court of quarter sessions is directed to certify that the liability of the Peerless Casualty Company on bail bond no. 70220, entered in the above case, has ceased.
§ 21.43 Access to requested records. ( a ) Access may be granted to requested records by: ( 1 ) Mailing a copy of the records to the requesting individual, or
( 2 ) Permitting the requesting individual to review the records in person between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m. at the office of the FDA Privacy Act Coordinator, at the Division of Freedom of Information Public Reading Room (address is located on the agency's web site at *http://www.fda.gov*), or at any Food and Drug Administration field office, listed in part 5, subpart M of this chapter, or at another location or time upon which the Food and Drug Administration and the individual agree. Arrangement for such review can be made by consultation between the FDA Privacy Act Coordinator and the individual. An individual seeking to review records in person shall generally be permitted access to the file copy, except that where the records include nondisclosable information, a copy shall be made of that portion of the records, with the nondisclosable information blocked out. Where the individual is not given a copy of the record to retain, no charge shall be made for the cost of copying a record to make it available to an individual who reviews a record in person under this paragraph.
( b ) An individual may request that a record be disclosed to or discussed in the presence of another individual, such as an attorney. The individual may be required to furnish a written statement authorizing the disclosure or discussion in such other individual's presence.
( c ) The Food and Drug Administration will make every reasonable effort to assure that records made available under this section can be understood by the individual, such as by providing an oral or written explanation of the records.
[42 FR 15626, Mar. 22, 1977, as amended at 46 FR 8458, Jan. 27, 1981; 69 FR 17290, Apr. 2, 2004; 76 FR 31470, June 1, 2011; 79 FR 68115, Nov. 14, 2014]
###### Editorial Note on Part 201

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 201 appear at 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004.

#### § 201.311 [Reserved]
SERVED NOVEMBER 3, 2010 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP09NM0010 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS No. FAA-2009 - 0721 

POST HEARING BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

Di-RARTMENTOF 

lANSPORWION 

• •:<£'!• OPERATIONS 

010 NOV - U A q:2 9 

This matter came for hearing on October 25, 2010 in Portland, OR. The 

hearing transcript is forthcoming. 

WHEREFORE, the parties shall adhere to the following Post Hearing 

Briefing Schedule: 

1. Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter "Complainant") shall 

file its Post-Hearing Brief on or before January 28, 2011; 

2. Federal Express, Inc. (hereinafter "Respondent") shall file its PostHearing Brief on or before February 14, 2011; and 

3. Complainant shall file its Rebuttal Brief, if any, on or before 

February 21, 2011. 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment(s) - Service List 
1 

I 

FA(Civi A Docke l Penaltty No Action . CP09NM000 ) 9 i 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Courtney E. Felts, Respondent's Counsel 

Staff Attorney, Federal Express, Inc. 

3620 Hacks Cross Road 

Building B, 3"" Floor 

Memphis, TN 38125-8800 

TEL: 901-434-8632 

FAX: 901-434-8283 

Lawrence W. Bierlein, Respondent's Counsel 

1101 30* Street, NW 

Suite 500 

Washington, DC 20007 

TEL: 202-625-8355 

FAX: 202-625-4363 

Scott R. Morris, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7, FAA 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton, WA 98057 

TEL: 425-227-1417 

FAX: 425-227-1007 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant 202-366-5121 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Hearing Docket, Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S. W., Wilbur Wright Building -

Room 2014, Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7280 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7280

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 23, 2024

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, 
                           and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To require the Inspector General of the Department of Housing and Urban 
  Development to testify before the Congress annually, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``HUD Transparency Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. CONGRESSIONAL TESTIMONY.

    Not later than October 1 of each year, the Inspector General of the 
Department of Housing and Urban Development shall appear before the 
Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate and 
present testimony on the Office of Inspector General's--
            (1) efforts to detect and prevent fraud, waste, and abuse;
            (2) ability to conduct and supervise audits, 
        investigations, and reviews;
            (3) actions to identify opportunities for the programs of 
        the Department of Housing and Urban Development to progress and 
        succeed;
            (4) recommendations to improve overall efficiency and 
        public accountability;
            (5) assessment of the extent to which the Department of 
        Housing and Urban Development has resources sufficient to carry 
        out its statutory mission; and
            (6) ongoing activities regarding any such additional work, 
        as appropriate.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 22, 2024.

            Attest:

                                             KEVIN F. MCCUMBER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### The State, ex rel. Sommerlad et al., *v.*Nickerson et al.

[No. 18,777.

Filed April 5, 1900.]

Justices of the *Peace.*— Change *of Venue.*— Costs.—Payment of costs is a condition precedent to the right of change of venue in actions before justices of the peace.

From the Marion Superior Court.

*Affirmed.*

*W. P. Adlcinson,*for appellants.

*8. W. Mansfield, 8. N. Chambers, 8. O. Pickens*and *C.*17. *Moores,*for appellees.

Baker, J.

The relators filed their verified application for a writ of mandate, showing that appellee Thndinm had begun an action against relators in the court of appellee Nickerson as justice of the peace for Center township in Marion county; that relators appeared on the return day and filed a proper affidavit for a-change of venue from the township; that the justice refused to grant the change except upon payment of the costs of the change in advance, which the justice stated to be $2; that relators refused to pay any sum in advance, but stated their, ability and willingness to pay, after the change was granted and the transcript prepared, whatever sum might legally be found due for the completed work; that the justice declined to grant the change on the terms proposed by relators; that afterwards on the same day, in the absence of relators, the justice rendered judgment in the case; that two days later relators tendered the justice $2 and demanded that he grant the change of venue and prepare and transmit the transcript; that the justice refused; and that the appellees are about to take steps to enforce the judgment. On this application, the court declined to proceed.

As the parties who are. named as appellees were not brought into court by alternative writ or otherwise, they were *440not parties to the judgment, and this appeal should have been prosecuted as an *ex parte*proceeding. *Ex parte Loy,*59 Ind. 235. But, so considered, the application affords no basis for sustaining a motion for the issuance of an alternative writ. The statute in relation to proceedings in justices’ courts provides that “No change of venue shall be granted, except on payment, or confession of judgment therefor and replevy thereof, of all costs occasioned by the change”. §1469 R. S. 1881 and Horner 1897, §1537 Burns 1894. Payment is a condition precedent to the right. The costs that will be occasioned by the change can be readily ascertained; and, if an overcharge is made by the justice, the party has ample remedies by civil and criminal actions. If the party should tender the justice the lawful costs that would be occasioned by the change, he might be entitled to a writ of mandate to compel the justice to grant the change; but these relators declined to pay or secure the costs as the statute requires. Oases cited in reference to the right to have changes of venue in circuit courts are inapplicable, because the statute providing therefor (§413 R. S. 1881 and Horner 1897, §417 Burns 1894) is essentially different from the statute here involved.

Judgment affirmed.
<PAGE>   1
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549


                                    FORM 8-K
                                 CURRENT REPORT


                     Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
                         Securities Exchange Act of 1934



Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported) June 22, 1998



                              THE LOEWEN GROUP INC.
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



<TABLE>
<S>                                         <C>                           <C>
    British Columbia, Canada                 0-18429                      98-0121376
(State or other jurisdiction of      (Commission File Number)    (IRS Employer Identification No.)
         incorporation)





         4126 Norland Avenue, Burnaby, British Columbia                                V5G 3S8
                   (Address of principal executive offices)                          (zip code)
</TABLE>



Registrant's telephone number, including area code 604-299-9321



                                       N/A
          (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)




                                                      Exhibit Index is on page 3
                                                                     Page 1 of 4



<PAGE>   2

ITEM 5.      OTHER EVENTS.

Pursuant to Form 8-K, General Instructions F, registrant hereby incorporates by
reference the press release attached hereto as Exhibit 99.


ITEM 7.      FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND EXHIBITS.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
            Exhibit No.                  Description
             -----------                  -----------
<S>                                       <C>
             Exhibit 99                   The Loewen Group Inc. Press Release 
                                          dated June 22, 1998
</TABLE>


                                   SIGNATURES

               Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by
the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

Dated: June 22, 1998


                                        THE LOEWEN GROUP INC.



                                        By: /s/ BRADLEY D. STAM
                                            ------------------------------------
                                        Name:  Bradley D. Stam
                                        Title: Senior Vice President, Law




<PAGE>   3

                                         EXHIBIT INDEX



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                Sequential
Number         Exhibit                                                         Page Number
------         -------                                                         -----------
<S>            <C>                                                             <C>
99             The Loewen Group Inc.                                                 4
               Press Release dated June 22, 1998
</TABLE>
# EUR-Lex - 31984R0288 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31984R0288

**Council Regulation (EEC) No 288/84 of 31 January 1984 on the classification of goods under subheading 07.01 H of the Common Customs Tariff **

*
Official Journal L 033 , 04/02/1984 P. 0001 - 0001 Finnish special edition: Chapter 2 Volume 4 P. 0030 Spanish special edition: Chapter 02 Volume 10 P. 0202 Swedish special edition: Chapter 2 Volume 4 P. 0030 Portuguese special edition Chapter 02 Volume 10 P. 0202 *

*****

COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) No 288/84

of 31 January 1984

on the classification of goods under subheading 07.01 H of the Common Customs Tariff

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN

COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 97/69 of 16 January 1969 on measures to be taken for uniform application of the nomenclature of the Common Customs Tariff (1), as last amended by the 1979 Act of Accession, and in particular Article 3 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Whereas, in order to ensure uniform application of the nomenclature of the Common Customs Tariff, provisions should be laid down concerning the tariff classification of fresh bulbs of the family Liliaceae, belonging to the genus 'Muscari', species 'Comosum' (common names 'Lampasciuolo', 'wild onions', 'lilas de terre', 'feather hyacinth');

Whereas heading No 07.01 of the Common Customs Tariff annexed to Regulation (EEC) No 950/68 (2), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 3678/83 (3), refers to vegetables, fresh or chilled;

Whereas the product in question, though sometimes used in floriculture, has the characteristics of goods falling within heading No 07.01; whereas, within this heading, subheading 07.01 H must be chosen;

Whereas, since the Committee on Common Customs Tariff Nomenclature has not given its assent, the Commission is unable to adopt the provisions it had envisaged under the procedure defined in Article 3 (2) and (3) of Regulation (EEC) No 97/69,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Fresh bulbs of the family Liliaceae belonging to the genus 'Muscari', species 'Comosum' (common names 'Lampasciulo', 'wild onions', 'lilas de terre', 'feather hyacinth'), shall be classified in the Common Customs Tariff under subheading:

07.01 Vegetables, fresh or chilled:

H. Onions, shallots and garlic.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 21st day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 31 January 1984.

For the Council

The President

G. LENGAGNE

(1) OJ No L 14, 21. 1. 1969, p. 1.

(2) OJ No L 172, 22. 7. 1968, p. 1.

(3) OJ No L 366, 28. 12. 1983, p. 53.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-7675

WILLIAM D. CREDLE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ROY COOPER; ERIK A. HOOKS; TODD ISHEE; PAULA SMITH; MICHAEL 

REGAN; MIKE CAUSEY; JAMES VAUGHAN; DOCTOR EVANS; NURSE 

HUX; UNIT MANAGER DUNLOW,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:21-ct-03162-D)

Submitted: September 16, 2022 Decided: October 24, 2022

Before HARRIS and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William D. Credle, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-7675 Doc: 14 Filed: 10/24/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

William D. Credle appeals the district court’s order dismissing, pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging First, Eighth, and 

Fourteenth Amendment violations by defendants. We have reviewed the record and find 

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Credle v. Cooper, 

No. 5:21-ct-03162-D, 2021 WL 5822264 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 18, 2021). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 21-7675 Doc: 14 Filed: 10/24/2022 Pg: 2 of 2