alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-60959

Summary Calendar

J. Reyes Luna Esparza, 

Petitioner,

versus

Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, 

Respondent.

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Agency No. A212 953 379

Before King, Higginson, and Willett, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

J. Reyes Luna Esparza, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for 

review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing 

his appeal and affirming the immigration judge’s (IJ’s) denial of his 

application for cancellation of removal.

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 14, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-60959 Document: 00516543449 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/14/2022
No. 21-60959

2

Luna Esparza argues that the BIA erred in denying his application for 

cancellation of removal based on the finding that he had failed to show that 

his son would suffer exceptional and extremely unusual hardship upon 

petitioner’sremoval to Mexico. He further argues that the hardship standard 

is unconscionable and violates his constitutional right to due process.

This court lacks jurisdiction to consider Luna Esparza’s challenge to 

the BIA’s hardship determination. See Patel v. Garland, 142 S. Ct. 1614, 1622

(2022); Castillo-Gutierrez v. Garland, 43 F.4th 477, 481 (5th Cir. 2022); 

8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B). We likewise lack jurisdiction to review Luna 

Esparza’s related argument that the BIA failed to consider certain relevant 

factors in its hardship determination. See Sung v. Keisler, 505 F.3d 372, 377 

(5th Cir. 2007).

Luna Esparza also raises a constitutional challenge to the hardship 

standard. He argues that the “exceptional and extremely unusual hardship”

requirement is an “unconscionable standard” as applied by the BIA because 

only applicants who can show that their qualifying relatives suffer from 

“serious physical medical conditions” will be eligible for cancellation of 

removal. Luna Esparza contends that the standard’s high burden violates the 

due-process rights of noncitizens. This court still has jurisdiction to consider 

constitutional challenges to the denial of cancellation of removal. See 8

U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D); see also Patel, 142 S. Ct. at 1623.

Nonetheless, “the failure to receive relief that is purely discretionary 

in nature does not amount to a deprivation of a liberty interest.” Assaad v. 

Ashcroft, 378 F.3d 471, 475 (5th Cir. 2004) (internal quotation marks and 

citations omitted). And cancellation of removal is a form of discretionary 

relief. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1).

The petition for review is DISMISSED in part and DENIED in 

part.

Case: 21-60959 Document: 00516543449 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/14/2022
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2012-1244 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2012-NM-112-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

 Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
### Geohydrology of North Eastern Province, Kenya

By: W.V. SwarzenskiMaurice John Mundorff

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1757N

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### § 171.110 Procedure for objections and hearings.

Objections and hearings relating to food additive regulations under section 409 (c), (d), or (h) of the Act shall be governed by part 12 of this chapter.

[42 FR 14491, Mar. 15, 1977, as amended at 42 FR 15674, Mar. 22, 1977]
**EXHIBIT 23.1** **CONSENT    OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration    Statements    No. 33-73044,No. 33-58037,No. 333-33433    and    No. 333-34549    on    Form S-8    and Registration Statement    No. 35-65229    on    Form S-4    of Bell Industries, Inc. of our report dated April 14, 2008    appearing in this Annual Report on    Form 10-K    of Bell Industries, Inc. for the year ended December 31,    2007. /s/  Crowe    Chizek and Company LLC     Indianapolis, Indiana    April 14, 2008
Editorial Note on Part 177
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 177 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 70 FR 72074, Dec. 1, 2005; and 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 177.1555 Polyarylate resins. Polyarylate resins (CAS Reg. No. 51706-10-6) may be safely used as articles or components of articles intended for use in contact with food in accordance with the following prescribed conditions: ( a ) *Identity.* Polyarylate resins (1, 3-benzenedicarboxylic acid, diphenyl ester, polymer with diphenyl 1,4-benzenedicarboxylate and 4-4′-(1-methylethylidine) bis(phenol)) are formed by melt polycondensation of bisphenol-A with diphenylisophthalate and diphenylterephthalate.
( b ) *Specifications.* ( 1 ) The finished copolymers shall contain from 70 to 80 weight percent of polymer units derived from diphenylisophthalate and 20 to 30 weight percent of polymer units derived from diphenylterephthalate.
( 2 ) Polyarylate resins shall have a minimum weight average molecular weight of 20,000.
( 3 ) Polyarylate resins may be identified by their characteristic infrared spectra.
( c ) *Extractive limitations.* The finished polyarylate resins in sheet form at least 0.5 millimeter (0.020 inch) thick, when extracted with water at 121 °C (250 °F) for 2 hours, shall yield total nonvolatile extractives not to exceed 2.33 micrograms per square centimeter (15 micrograms per square inch) of the exposed resin surface.
( d ) *Limitations.* Polyarylate resin articles may be used in contact with all foods except beverages containing more than 8 volume percent ethanol under conditions of use A through H, described in table 2 of § 176.170(c) of this chapter.
[52 FR 35540, Sept. 22, 1987]
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-11-0000557 06-JUN-2014 08:03 AM
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION

I, James Vandeberg, Chief Financial Officer of IAS Communications, Inc. certify
  that:

|1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of IAS
      Communications, Inc.;                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|2. | Based on my knowledge, this annual report
        does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
        a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
        circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
        respect to the period covered by this annual report; and
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial
        statements, and other financial information included in this annual report,
        fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results
        of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
        presented in this annual report.                       

| | IAS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
| | ----------------------
| |                       
| | By:                   
| |                       
| |                       
| |                       

Date: October 16, 2003

---
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 36 (Wednesday, February 24, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 8300]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3682]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of 
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS).
    Title: BIS Program Evaluation.
    OMB Control Number: 0694-0125.
    Form Number(s): N/A.
    Type of Request: Regular submission.
    Burden Hours: 500.
    Number of Respondents: 3,000.
    Average Hours per Response: 10 minutes.
    Needs and Uses: This survey capability is needed by BIS seminar 
instructors for seminar programs conducted throughout the year. The 
participants will be asked to evaluate seminar content and to provide 
input for future programs. Their responses will provide useful and 
practical information that BIS can use to determine whether or not it 
is providing a quality program and make recommended improvements.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit organizations; not-
for-profit institutions.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    OMB Desk Officer: Jasmeet Seehra, (202) 395-3123.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Diana Hynek, Departmental Paperwork Clearance 
Officer, (202) 482-0266, Department of Commerce, Room 6625, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#503418293e353b10343f337e373f26"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bcd8f4c5d2d9d7fcd8d3df92dbd3ca">[email protected]</span></a>).
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to Jasmeet Seehra, OMB Desk Officer via the Internet at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#357f5446585050416a7e1b6a6650505d4754755a58571b505a451b525a43"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a6ecc7d5cbc3c3d2f9ed88f9f5c3c3ced4c7e6c9cbc488c3c9d688c1c9d0">[email protected]</span></a>, or by fax to (202) 395-5167.

    Dated: February 19, 2010.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-3682 Filed 2-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-33-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### Served: Ju ly 6, 2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation

on the 6 th of July, 2011

Essential Air Service at

GREENVILLE, MISSISSIPPI

Under 49 U.S.C. 4 1731 et seq

. DOCKET 200 8

- 0209

NOTICE OF EXTENSION

By Order 2011

- 5

- 10, May 9 th , we requested proposals for EAS at Greenville, Mississippi,

no later than June 8, 2011. The current contract with Mesaba expires on September 30

, 2011. By email dated June 8 , 2011, Gulfstream International Airlines requested an

extension until July 8, 2011. The community of Greenville also requested an extension. By

Notice dated June 8, we granted the requests. By email dated July 5, Air Choice On e

requested an exten sion until July 22 , and indicates that the community is not opposed to the

extension.

W e have decided to grant the request of Air Choice O ne , as the additional amount of time is

not unreasonable. All parties must now file c ompetitive proposals for EAS at Greenville,

Mississippi, no later than July 22 , 20 1 1

.

Dennis DeVany, Chief,

EAS and Domestic Analysis

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at

http://www.regulations.gov
<PAGE>
 
  
                                                                   EXHIBIT 11

                       EVEREN CAPITAL CORPORATION
               PRO FORMA COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                  (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
                               (UNAUDITED)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                              Year ended December 31,

                                                   1995          1994
                                                   ----          ----
<S>                                              <C>        <C>
Net loss reported                             $   (15,854)  $    (2,238)

Less: Pro forma dividends on exchangeable
       preferred stock (13.5% of liquidation 
       value)                                      (2,130)       (2,130)
                                              ------------  ------------

     Pro forma net loss applicable to
      common shares                           $   (17,984)  $    (4,368)
                                              ============  ============

Pro forma net loss per common share           $     (1.47)  $      (.36)
                                              ------------  ------------



Pro forma weighted average common shares
   outstanding:                                12,208,532    12,208,532
                                              ============  ============

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32**

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

 

The certifications set forth below are hereby submitted to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission pursuant to, and solely for the purpose of complyingwith, Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code in connectionwith the filing on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commissionof the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31,2004.

 

Each of theundersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of CitizensBancshares Corporation and subsidiaries (the “Company”) that the QuarterlyReport of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end ofsuch period and the results of operations of the Company for such period.

 

 
| Date:  May  14, 2004 | By:                                                           | /s/  James E. Young   |   |
|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|--------|
|                           | James  E. Young                                               |
|                           | President  and Chief Executive Officer                        |
|                           |                                                          |                  |
| Date:  May  14, 2004 | By:                                                           | /s/  Willard C. Lewis |   |
|                           | Willard  C. Lewis                                             |
|                           | Senior  Executive Vice President and  Chief Operating Officer |
|                           |                                                          |
| Date:  May  14, 2004 | By:                                                           | /s/  Samuel J. Cox    |   |
|                           | Samuel  J. Cox                                                |
|                           | Senior  Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer           |
|                                |                                                               |                       |        |  |

 

1

----
Exhibit
15.1
  To the
Partners of Icahn
Enterprises L.P.
 
 We have
reviewed, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the unaudited consolidated interim financial
statements of Icahn Enterprises L.P. and Subsidiaries as of June 30, 2010, and
for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, as
indicated in our report dated August 4, 2010; because we did not perform an
audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.
 
 We are
aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 is incorporated by
reference in Registration Statements on Forms S-3 (File No. 333-158705,
effective May 17, 2010 and File No. 333-143930, effective December 31, 2007) and
Form S-4 (File No. 333-166139, effective June 21, 2010).
 
 We also
are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the
Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement
prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11
of that Act.
 
 
 /s/ Grant
Thornton, LLP
 
 New York,
New York
 August 4,
2010
§ 1317.90 Methods of destruction. ( a ) All controlled substances to be destroyed by a registrant, or caused to be destroyed by a registrant pursuant to § 1317.95(c), shall be destroyed in compliance with applicable Federal, State, tribal, and local laws and regulations and shall be rendered non-retrievable.
( b ) Where multiple controlled substances are comingled, the method of destruction shall be sufficient to render all such controlled substances non-retrievable. When the actual substances collected for destruction are unknown but may reasonably include controlled substances, the method of destruction shall be sufficient to render non-retrievable any controlled substance likely to be present.
( c ) The method of destruction shall be consistent with the purpose of rendering all controlled substances to a non-retrievable state in order to prevent diversion of any such substance to illicit purposes and to protect the public health and safety.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       1,170,797
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  401,877
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    637,191
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,260,116
<PP&E>                                         295,785
<DEPRECIATION>                                 249,277
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,345,281
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          192,557
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        34,009
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,118,715
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,345,281
<SALES>                                        757,899
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               757,899
<CGS>                                          293,685
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  293,685
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               451,830
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 35,825
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             35,825
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    35,825
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>