alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





|In connection with the annual report of Naturewell, Incorporated (the "Registrant") on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") the undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|Dated:  October 13, 2010
<PAGE>

Exhibit 23.1

                        Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8) pertaining to the Midway Airlines Corporation Executive Officers Stock
Option Agreements and the Midway Airlines Corporation 1997 Stock Option Plan, of
our report dated February 2, 2000, except for the last paragraph of Note 3 and
Note 13, as to which the date is February 29, 2000, with respect to the
financial statements and schedule of Midway Airlines Corporation included in its
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1999.

                                            /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Raleigh, North Carolina
March 29, 2000
<PAGE>   1


HANCOCK FABRICS, INC.                                            EXHIBIT 11
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
(unaudited)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(dollars in thousands, except for
 per share amounts)                        Thirteen Weeks Ended           Twenty-six Weeks Ended
                                        ---------------------------     ----------------------------                  
                                          August 2,       August 3,       August 2,       August 3,
                                            1998             1997            1998           1997
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                     <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>
Primary earnings per share

  Net earnings                          $        442    $      1,689    $      2,549    $      4,028
                                        ============    ============    ============    ============
  Weighted average number of
   common shares outstanding during
   period                                 20,298,940      21,042,261      20,456,265      21,012,446
                                        ============    ============    ============    ============
Basic earnings per share                $       0.02    $       0.08    $       0.12    $       0.19
                                        ============    ============    ============    ============

Diluted earnings per share

  Net earnings                          $        442    $      1,689    $      2,549    $      4,028
                                        ============    ============    ============    ============
  Weighted average number of common
    shares outstanding during
    period                                20,298,940      21,042,261      20,456,265      21,012,446

  Common stock equivalents                   239,977         394,978         337,422         386,837

  Contigently issuable shares                 56,203          74,311          77,722          57,342
                                        ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------
                                          20,595,120      21,511,550      20,871,409      21,456,625
                                        ============    ============    ============    ============
Diluted earnings per share              $       0.02    $       0.08    $       0.12    $       0.19
                                        ============    ============    ============    ============
</TABLE>
[No. 15654-1-III.

Division Three.

December 4, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Appellant,*v. Aaron Runyon, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Franklin County, No. 95-1-50177-9, Craig Matheson, J., entered April 2, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Sweeney, C.J., concurred in by Schultheis and Brown, JJ.
§ 290.10 Definition of emergency situation. For the purposes of authorizing an oral prescription of a controlled substance listed in schedule II of the Federal Controlled Substances Act, the term *emergency situation* means those situations in which the prescribing practitioner determines: ( a ) That immediate administration of the controlled substance is necessary, for proper treatment of the intended ultimate user; and
( b ) That no appropriate alternative treatment is available, including administration of a drug which is not a controlled substance under schedule II of the Act, and
( c ) That it is not reasonably possible for the prescribing practitioner to provide a written prescription to be presented to the person dispensing the substance, prior to the dispensing.
#### FRANK BLACKLOCK, EXECUTOR OF RINALDO P. SMITH, v. THE UNITED STATES.

[41 C. Cls., 89; 208 U. S. R., 75.]

*On the claimant's Appeal.*

Internal-revenue taxes are due from one Smith to tbe United States in August, 1869. Subsequently a demand for payment is made by tbe collector. Subsequent to the demand Smith exe*588cutes a deed of trust in the nature of a mortgage to one Beazeley to secure the loan. Subsequent to the deed of trust the collector distrains upon the mortgaged property and sells it. The United States having bid in the property, through its collector at the tax sale, subsequently sell and convey it to a third party. Beazeley’s representatives then advertise the property for sale, but the sale is stayed by an injunction of a State court. The representatives of the mortgagees now come into court under a special act of Congress conferring jurisdiction to hear and determine the claim of the claimants against the Government “ *on account of the sale, purchase, or occupation by the Government, through its internal-revenue officers, or others, of certain real estate,"*etc.

The court below decides:

I.If any person neglects to pay an internal-revenue tax after demand, the *Act of 13th July, 1866*(14 Stat. L., p. 107), declares that “ *the amount shall he a lien in favor of the United, States from the time it was due until paid*” “ *upon all property and rights to property belonging to such*person.” This lien is superior to a mortgage or deed of trust executed subsequently to the demand for payment, and embraces every species of property subject to ownership.

II.The collector, “ *after demand, may levy upon all property and rights to property belonging to such person*” “ *or on which said lien exists, for the payment of the sum due as aforesaid;" and in all cases of sale, as aforesaid, the certificate of such sale shall transfer to the purchaser all right, title, and interest of such delinquent in and to the property sold."*The only condition imposed by the statute upon the collector is that there shall have been a demand for payment and neglect or refusal, after demand, by the taxpayer.

III. A collector, under the act 13th July, 1S86, may levy upon and sell the property; or the Commissioner of Internal Revenue may' direct that a bill in chancery be filed to enforce the lien, under the *Act ZOih July, 1868*(15 Stat. L., p. 167). The latter act does not repeal the former.

IV. A tax sale conveys to the purchaser no other interest in the property than that belonging to the delinquent tax debtor at the time the Government’s lien attached. If a third person have a prior lien or interest in the property by mortgage or deed of trust, it will not be destroyed by the sale; and if it be duly recorded, the record will be notice to the purchaser.

V.A mortgagee, or beneficiary under a deed of trust, may protect his security against the prior lien of the Government or *589may redeem the premises if sold under the act July 13, 1S66.

The decision of the court below is affirmed upon the same grounds.

Mr. Justice Harlan

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court January 18, 1908.
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE

.

IN THE 

## A RIZONA 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS

D IVISION O NE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent ,

v.

MICHAEL ANTHONY MEARS , Petitioner

.
N o . 1 CA

- CR 17

- 0623 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Mohave County

No. S8015CR201300803 The Honorable Derek C. Carlisle , Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELI EF DENIED

COUNSEL
Maricopa County Attorney’s Office , Phoenix By Diane M. Meloche Counsel for Respondent

The Nolan Law Firm, PLLC, Mesa By Cari McConeghy Nolan , Todd E. Nolan Counsel for Petitioner FILED 4-17-2018S TATE v. MEARS Decision of the Court

2 MEMORANDUM DECISION Presiding Judge Lawrence F. Winthrop, Judge Jennifer B. Campbell, and Judge Paul J. McMurdie delivered the decision of the Court.

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Petitioner Michael Anthony Mears seeks review of the superior court’s order denying his petition for post

- conviction relief, filed pursuant to Arizona Ru le of Criminal Procedure 3 2.1. Thi s is petitioner’s first petition.
¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post

- conviction relief. State v. Gutierrez , 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post

- conviction relief. See State v. Poblete , 227 Ariz. 537, 538, ¶ 1 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review).
¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court’s order denying the petition for post

- conviction relief, and the petition for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of discretion.
¶4 We grant review but deny relief.
§ 21.70 Disclosure and intra-agency use of records in Privacy Act Record Systems; no accounting required. ( a ) A record about an individual which is contained in a Privacy Act Record System may be disclosed: ( 1 ) To the individual who is the subject of the record, or his legal guardian under § 21.75;
( 2 ) To a third party pursuant to a written request by, or within a written consent of, the individual to whom the record pertains, or his legal guardian under § 21.75;
( 3 ) To any person: ( i ) Where the names and other identifying information are first deleted, and under circumstances in which the recipient is unlikely to know the identity of the subject of the record;
( ii ) Where disclosure is required by part 20 of this chapter (the public information regulations); or
( 4 ) Within the Department of Health and Human Services to officers and employees who have a need for the record in the performance of their duties in connection with the laws administered and enforced by the Food and Drug Administration or that govern the agency. For purposes of this section, officers or employees of the Department shall include the following categories of individuals, who shall thereafter be subject to the same restrictions with respect to disclosure as any Food and Drug Administration employee: Food and Drug Administration consultants and advisory committees, State and local government employees for use only in their work with the Food and Drug Administration, and contractors and their employees to the extent that the records of such contractors are subject to the requirements of this part under § 21.30.
( b ) No accounting is required for any disclosure or use under paragraph (a) of this section.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                                  CERTIFICATION
                  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
              ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350,
                   CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of National Datacomputer, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 (the
"Form 10-QSB") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information
contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: November 13, 2004                 /s/ John P. Ward
                                         -------------------------------
                                         John P. Ward
                                         Chairman of the Board, President and
                                         Chief Executive Officer


Dated: November 13, 2004                 /s/ Gerald S. Eilberg
                                         -------------------------------
                                         Gerald S. Eilberg
                                         Senior Vice President of Finance and
                                         Administration and Chief Financial
                                         Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(a)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Report on Form 10-Q of International Absorbents Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: December 8, 2006
    
    /s/ David H. ThompsonDavid H. ThompsonSecretary and Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7172 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7172

 To direct the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to promulgate regulations 
prohibiting the issuance of certain certificates and licenses without a 
finding that a certain system or facility can safely operate with spent 
    nuclear fuel for a period of at least 100 years, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 31, 2024

Mr. Levin (for himself and Mr. Carbajal) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to promulgate regulations 
prohibiting the issuance of certain certificates and licenses without a 
finding that a certain system or facility can safely operate with spent 
    nuclear fuel for a period of at least 100 years, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``100 Year Canister Life Act''.

SEC. 2. SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL DRY CASK SAFETY.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 18 months after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Commission shall promulgate final 
regulations, after providing notice and opportunity for public comment, 
prohibiting any Certificate of Compliance for a cask for a spent 
nuclear fuel dry storage system, or any specific license for a cask for 
a spent nuclear fuel dry storage facility, to be issued or renewed by 
the Commission without a finding that such system or facility can 
safely operate with spent nuclear fuel for a period of at least 100 
years.
    (b) Savings Clause.--Nothing in this section shall be construed to 
require the Commission to change the term of an initial license, or a 
renewal of a license, issued under part 72 of title 10, Code of Federal 
Regulations (or any successor regulations).
    (c) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Cask.--The term ``cask'' has the meaning given such 
        term in section 72.3 of title 10, Code of Federal Regulations 
        (or any successor regulations).
            (2) Certificate of compliance.--The term ``Certificate of 
        Compliance'' has the meaning given such term in section 72.3 of 
        title 10, Code of Federal Regulations (or any successor 
        regulations).
            (3) Commission.--The term ``Commission'' means the Nuclear 
        Regulatory Commission.
            (4) Spent nuclear fuel.--The term ``spent nuclear fuel'' 
        has the meaning given such term in section 72.3 of title 10, 
        Code of Federal Regulations (or any successor regulations).
                                 <all>
```
§ 3.3 Scope. This section applies to: ( a ) Any combination product, or
( b ) Any product where the agency component with primary jurisdiction is unclear or in dispute.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-14-0001017

30-JUN-2017

08:09 AM