alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 890 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 890

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         June 27, 2006.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 5672) making appropriations for Science, the Departments of State, 
Justice, and Commerce, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 
30, 2007, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be 
dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the bill are 
waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one 
hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member 
of the Committee on Appropriations. After general debate the bill shall be 
considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. All points of order against 
provisions in the bill for failure to comply with clause 2 of rule XXI are 
waived except: beginning with the colon on page 15, line 18, through page 16, 
line 4; page 24, lines 17 and 18; and section 607. Where points of order are 
waived against part of a paragraph, points of order against language in another 
part of such paragraph may be made only against such other part and not against 
the entire paragraph. During consideration of the bill for amendment, the 
Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the 
basis of whether the Member offering an amendment has caused it to be printed in 
the portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 
of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. When the 
committee rises and reports the bill back to the House with a recommendation 
that the bill do pass, the previous question shall be considered as ordered on 
the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion 
except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
    Sec. 2. Upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order, any rule 
of the House to the contrary notwithstanding, to consider concurrent resolutions 
providing for adjournment of the House and Senate during the month of July.
    Sec. 3. House Resolution 878 is laid upon the table.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Editorial Note on Part 112
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 112 appear at 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 112.32 What hygienic practices must personnel use? ( a ) Personnel who work in an operation in which covered produce or food contact surfaces are at risk of contamination with known or reasonably foreseeable hazards must use hygienic practices while on duty to the extent necessary to protect against such contamination.
( b ) The hygienic practices that personnel use to satisfy the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section when handling (contacting) covered produce or food contact surfaces during a covered activity must include all of the following practices: ( 1 ) Maintaining adequate personal cleanliness to protect against contamination of covered produce and food contact surfaces;
( 2 ) Avoiding contact with animals other than working animals, and taking appropriate steps to minimize the likelihood of contamination of covered produce when in direct contact with working animals;
( 3 ) Washing hands thoroughly, including scrubbing with soap (or other effective surfactant) and running water that satisfies the requirements of § 112.44(a) (as applicable) for water used to wash hands, and drying hands thoroughly using single-service towels, sanitary towel service, electric hand dryers, or other adequate hand drying devices: ( i ) Before starting work;
( ii ) Before putting on gloves;
( iii ) After using the toilet;
( iv ) Upon return to the work station after any break or other absence from the work station;
( v ) As soon as practical after touching animals (including livestock and working animals), or any waste of animal origin; and
( vi ) At any other time when the hands may have become contaminated in a manner that is reasonably likely to lead to contamination of covered produce with known or reasonably foreseeable hazards;
( 4 ) If you choose to use gloves in handling covered produce or food contact surfaces, maintaining gloves in an intact and sanitary condition and replacing such gloves when no longer able to do so;
( 5 ) Removing or covering hand jewelry that cannot be adequately cleaned and sanitized during periods in which covered produce is manipulated by hand; and
( 6 ) Not eating, chewing gum, or using tobacco products in an area used for a covered activity (however, drinking beverages is permitted in designated areas).
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.1

                    [PIVOTAL CORPORATION STOCK CERTIFICATE]

<PAGE>   2



     The Company will furnish to any shareholder without charge upon request to
the Transfer Agent named on the face of this Certificate a statement of the
powers, designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other
special rights of each class of shares or series thereof and the qualifications,
limitations or restrictions of such preferences and/or rights.

     The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of
this Certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full
according to applicable laws or regulations:

TEN COM - as tenants in common         UNIF GIFT MIN ACT ......Custodian......
TEN ENT - as tenants by the entities                      (Cust)        (Minor)
JT TEN  - as joint tenants with right of            Under Uniform Gift to Minors
          survivorship and not as tenants           Act.........................
          in common                                            (State)

         Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto

Please insert social security or other
   identifying number of assignee

______________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________
                        (Name and address of transferor)

________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________ common shares

registered in the name of the undersigned on the books of the Company named on
the face of this Certificate and represented hereby, and irrevocably constitutes
and appoints:

___________________________________________________________________ the attorney

of the undersigned to transfer the said common shares on the register of
transfers and books of the Company with full power of substitution hereunder.

DATED:


____________________________________        ____________________________________
      (Signature of Witness)                     (Signature of Shareholder)

NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE OF THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS
        WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE, IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT
        ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT, OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.

The signature(s) must be guaranteed by an eligible guarantor institution (Bank,
Stockbroker, Savings and Loan Associations and Credit Unions with membership in
an approved Signature guarantee Medallion Program), pursuant to S.E.C. Rule
17Ad-15.

SIGNATURE GUARANTEED by: _______________________________________________________
**Exhibit32**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.**

The certifications set forthbelow are hereby submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuantto, and solely for the purpose of complying with, Section 1350 of Chapter 63 ofTitle 18 of the United States Code in connection with the filing on the datehereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2006.

Each of the undersignedhereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Citizens BancsharesCorporation and subsidiaries (the “Company”) that, to his knowledge on the dateof this certification, the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended June 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information containedin such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionof the Company at the end of such period and the results of operations of theCompany for such period.

 
| Date:  | August 11, 2006 | By:                                   | /s/ James E. Young |   |
|--------|-----------------|---------------------------------------|--------------------|--------|
|   |            | James E. Young                        |
|   |            | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |            |                                  |
|   |            |                                  |
| Date:  | August 11, 2006 | By:                                   | /s/ Cynthia N. Day |   |
|   |            | Cynthia N. Day                        |
|   |            | Senior Executive Vice President and   |
|   |            | Chief Operating Officer               |
|   |            |                                  |
|   |            |                                  |
| Date:  | August 11, 2006 | By:                                   | /s/ Samuel J. Cox  |   |
|   |            | Samuel J. Cox                         |
|   |            | Senior Executive Vice President and   |
|   |            | Chief Financial Officer               |
|        |                 |                                       |                    |        |  |  |

 

1

----
§ 182.2122 Aluminum calcium silicate. ( a ) *Product.* Aluminum calcium silicate.
( b ) *Tolerance.* 2 percent.
( c ) *Limitations, restrictions, or explanation.* This substance is generally recognized as safe when used in table salt in accordance with good manufacturing practice.
Date: December 14, 2011 

Subject: The Effect on the Mercury Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) 

Floor of Not Subcategorizing Mercury Emissions for all Coal-fired Electric 

Utility Steam Generating Units 

From: Jeffrey Cole (RTI International) 

To: Bill Maxwell 

 OAQPS/SPPD/ESG (D243-01) 

 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

 Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

The EPA requested that RTI calculate the Hg MACT floor value resulting from a 

subcategory containing all coal-fired electric utility steam generating units (i.e., non-low rank 

virgin coal and low rank virgin coal). The Hg MACT floor is based on 12 percent of the 

emissions data collected by EPA in the recent information collection request (ICR). The data set 

for this subcategory would include 398 emission averages. This would result in 48 (398 x 0.12) 

units being represented in the MACT floor. The resulting MACT floor value would be 

1.11 rounded to 1.2 lb/TBtu. 

The reason for this MACT floor value being essentially equivalent to the Hg MACT floor 

value for the same subcategory without low rank virgin coal-fired boilers is that, even by adding 

the low rank virgin coal data (11 emission averages) into the MACT pool, it still does not bring 

the lowest Hg emitting low rank virgin coal-fired boiler into the new MACT floor data pool of 

48 emission averages.
§ 20.44 Expedited processing. ( a ) The Food and Drug Administration will provide expedited processing of a request for records when the requester demonstrates a compelling need, or in other cases as determined by the agency. A compelling need exists when: ( 1 ) A failure to obtain requested records on an expedited basis could reasonably be expected to pose an imminent threat to the life or physical safety of an individual; or
( 2 ) With respect to a request made by a person primarily engaged in disseminating information, there is a demonstrated urgency to inform the public concerning actual or alleged Federal Government activity.
( b ) A request for expedited processing made under paragraph (a)(1) of this section must be made by the specific individual who is subject to an imminent threat, or by a family member, medical or health care professional, or other authorized representative of the individual, and must demonstrate a reasonable basis for concluding that failure to obtain the requested records on an expedited basis could reasonably be expected to pose a specific and identifiable imminent threat to the life or safety of the individual.
( c ) A request for expedited processing made under paragraph (a)(2) of this section must demonstrate that: ( 1 ) The requester is primarily engaged in disseminating information to the general public and not merely to a narrow interest group;
( 2 ) There is an urgent need for the requested information and that it has a particular value that will be lost if not obtained and disseminated quickly; however, a news media publication or broadcast deadline alone does not qualify as an urgent need, nor does a request for historical information; and
( 3 ) The request for records specifically concerns identifiable operations or activities of the Federal Government.
( d ) All requests for expedited processing shall be filed in writing as provided by § 20.40. Each such request shall include information that demonstrates a reasonable basis for concluding that a compelling need exists within the meaning of paragraph (a) of this section and a certification that the information provided in the request is true and correct to the best of the requester's knowledge and belief. Any statements made in support of a request for expedited processing are subject to the False Reports to the Government Act (18 U.S.C. 1001).
( e ) The Director, Division of Freedom of Information, (or delegatee) will determine whether to grant a request for expedited processing within 10 days of receipt by the Division of Freedom of Information of all information required to make a decision.
( f ) If the agency grants a request for expedited processing, the agency shall process the request as soon as practicable.
( g ) If the agency denies a request for expedited processing, the agency shall process the request with other nonexpedited requests.
( h ) If the agency denies a request for expedited processing, the requester may appeal the agency's decision by writing to the official identified in the denial letter.
[68 FR 25286, May 12, 2003, as amended at 76 FR 31469, June 1, 2011; 87 FR 55912, Sept. 13, 2022]
# m8737.docx

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 19.1.2018 C(2018) 448 final To the notifying parties: Subject : Case M. 8737 - AMTRUST / MADISON DEARBORN PARTNERS / MAYFIELD HOLDINGS JV Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 1 and Article 57 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area 2 Dear Sir or Madam, 1. On 18 December 2017 , the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which Amtrust Financial Services (" AmTrust ") (USA) and Madison Dearborn Partners ("MDP") (USA ) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and Article 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the whole of Mayfield Holdings ("Mayfield") ( USA ) by way of purchase of shares in a newly created company constituting a joint venture . 3 2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are: - for AmTrust : AmTrust is a US - based insur ance conglomerate - for MDP: MDP is a US-based private equity investment firm, with investments in a range of industries. 3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5 ( a ) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 . 4 4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation and Article 57 of the EEA Agreement . For the Commission (signed)
Johannes LAITENBERGER Director - General
(1)
OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ( the ' Merger Regulation ' ). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( ' TFEU ' ) has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of ' Community ' by ' Union ' and ' common market ' by ' internal market ' . The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.
(2) OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3 ( the ' EEA Agreement ' ).
(3) Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 444 , 23.12.2017 , p. 12 .
(4)
OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5 .
###### Editorial Note on Part 137

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 137 appear at 63 FR 14035, Mar. 24, 1998.

#### § 137.160 Enriched bromated flour.

Enriched bromated flour conforms to the definition and standard of identity, and is subject to the requirements for label statement of ingredients, prescribed for enriched flour by § 137.165, except that potassium bromate is added in a quantity not exceeding 50 parts to each million parts of the finished enriched bromated flour, and is added only to enriched flours whose baking qualities are improved by such addition.

[58 FR 2877, Jan. 6, 1993]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          40,250
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,925,766
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,366
<INVENTORY>                                  3,009,396
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,287,510
<PP&E>                                       2,190,246
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,641,830
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,593,153
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,593,144
<BONDS>                                        448,702
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,144
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,481,599)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,593,153
<SALES>                                      5,182,008
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,253,326
<CGS>                                        4,207,133
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,070,028
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             326,537
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,350,372)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,350,372)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,350,372)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.19)


</TABLE>
DISMISS; Opinion Filed March 28, 2013.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-13-00071-CR

ARCHIE LESEAN WILLIAMS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F11-50816-T

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Francis, Lang, and Evans 

Opinion by Justice Lang

Archie Lesean Williams was convicted, following the adjudication of his guilt, of felony 

assault involving family violence. Pursuant to a plea agreement at the adjudication hearing, the 

trial court sentenced appellant to three years’ imprisonment. Appellant waived his right to 

appeal in conjunction with the plea agreement. See Blanco v. State, 18 S.W.3d 218, 219–20 

(Tex. Crim. App. 2000). The trial court certified that appellant does not have the right to appeal. 

See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Accordingly, we dismiss the 

appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Do Not Publish

TEX. R. APP. P. 47

130071F.U05

/Douglas S. Lang/

DOUGLAS S. LANG

JUSTICE
Court of Appeals

S

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

ARCHIE LESEAN WILLIAMS, Appellant

No. 05-13-00071-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F11-50816-T.

Opinion delivered by Justice Lang, Justices 

Francis and Evans participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of 

jurisdiction.

Judgment entered this 28th day of March, 2013.

/Douglas S. Lang/

DOUGLAS S. LANG

JUSTICE
§ 182.6757 Sodium gluconate. ( a ) *Product.* Sodium gluconate.
( b ) *Conditions of use.* This substance is generally recognized as safe when used in accordance with good manufacturing practice.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION 906
      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Southwall
      Technologies Inc. (the “Company”), for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Sylvia Kamenski, the Vice President of Finance of the Company,
      hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and








2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.






May
                15, 2006
            By:
            /s/ Sylvia KamenskiSylvia
                Kamenski*Vice
                President of Finance*








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
      document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
      that
      appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
      required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be
      retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.





In
      accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K, this certification is being
“furnished” as Exhibit 32.2 to the Company's quarterly report and shall not
      be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that
      section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under
      the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as expressly set forth
      by
      specific reference in such a filing.