7600 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 34 / Monday, February 22, 2010 / Notices 

Health and Science, Office of the 

Secretary, Department of Health and 

Human Services. 

ACTION: Notice of meeting. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 217a, Section 222 of 

the Public Health Service Act, as amended. 

The Committee is governed by the provision 

of Public Law 92–463, as amended (5 U.S.C. 

Appendix 2), which sets forth standards for 

the formation and use of advisory 

committees. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Health and Human Services (HHS) 

announces the next Federal advisory 

committee meeting regarding the 

national health promotion and disease 

prevention objectives for 2020. This 

meeting will be open to the public and 

will be held online via WebEx software. 

The Secretary’s Advisory Committee on 

National Health Promotion and Disease 

Prevention Objectives for 2020 will 

address efforts to develop the nation’s 

health promotion and disease 

prevention objectives and strategies to 

improve the health status and reduce 

health risks for Americans by the year 

2020. The Committee will provide to the 

Secretary of Health and Human Services 

advice and consultation for developing 

and implementing the next iteration of 

national health promotion and disease 

prevention goals and objectives and 

provide recommendations for initiatives 

to occur during the initial 

implementation phase of the goals and 

objectives. The meeting’s agenda will 

include the Committee’s review of the 

work and recommendations of its 

subcommittees on Priorities, Social 

Determinants of Health, 

Implementation, Evidence-based 

Resources, Strategic Health 

Communication, and Data and Health 

Information Technology. HHS will use 

the recommendations to inform the 

development of the national health 

promotion and disease prevention 

objectives for 2020 and the process for 

implementing the objectives. The intent 

is to develop and launch objectives 

designed to improve the health status 

and reduce health risks for Americans 

by the year 2020. 

DATES: The Committee will meet on 

April 1, 2010 from 2 p.m. to 4 p.m. 

Eastern Time (ET). 

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held 

online, via WebEx software. For detailed 

instructions about how to make sure 

that your windows computer and 

browser is set up for WebEx, please visit 

the ‘‘Secretary’s Advisory Committee’’ 

Web page of the Healthy People Web 

site at: http://www.healthypeople.gov/ 

hp2020/advisory/default.asp. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Emmeline Ochiai, Designated Federal 

Officer, Secretary’s Advisory Committee 

on National Health Promotion and 

Disease Prevention Objectives for 2020, 

U.S. Department of Health and Human 

Services, Office of Public Health and 

Science, Office of Disease Prevention 

and Health Promotion, 1101 Wootton 

Parkway, Room LL–100, Rockville, MD 

20852, (240) 453–8259 (telephone), 

(240) 453–8281 (fax). Additional 

information is available on the Internet 

at http://www.healthypeople.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Purpose of Meeting: Every 10 years, 

through the Healthy People initiative, 

HHS leverages scientific insights and 

lessons from the past decade, along with 

the new knowledge of current data, 

trends, and innovations to develop the 

next iteration of national health 

promotion and disease prevention 

objectives. Healthy People provides 

science-based, 10-year national 

objectives for promoting health and 

preventing disease. Since 1979, Healthy 

People has set and monitored national 

health objectives to meet a broad range 

of health needs, encourage 

collaborations across sectors, guide 

individuals toward making informed 

health decisions, and measure the 

impact of our prevention and health 

promotion activities. Healthy People 

2020 will reflect assessments of major 

risks to health and wellness, changing 

public health priorities, and emerging 

issues related to our nation’s health 

preparedness and prevention. 

Public Participation at Meeting: 

Members of the public are invited to 

listen to the online Committee meeting. 

There will be no opportunity for oral 

public comments during the online 

Committee meeting. Written comments, 

however, are welcome throughout the 

development process of the national 

health promotion and disease 

prevention objectives for 2020. They can 

be submitted through the Healthy 

People Web site at: http:// 

www.healthypeople.gov/hp2020/ 

comments/ or they can be e-mailed to 

HP2020@hhs.gov. 

To listen to the Committee meeting, 

individuals must pre-register to attend 

at the Healthy People Web site located 

at http://www.healthypeople.gov. 

Participation in the meeting is limited. 

Registrations will be accepted until 

maximum WebEx capacity is reached 

and must be completed by 9 a.m. ET on 

April 1, 2010. A waiting list will be 

maintained should registrations exceed 

WebEx capacity. Individuals on the 

waiting list will be contacted as 

additional space for the meeting 

becomes available. 

Registration questions may be 

directed to Hilary Scherer at 

HP2020@norc.org (e-mail), (301) 634– 

9374 (phone) or (301) 634–9301 (fax). 

Dated: February 16, 2010. 

Penelope Slade-Sawyer, 

RADM, USPHS, Deputy Assistant Secretary 

for Health, Disease Prevention and Health 

Promotion. 

[FR Doc. 2010–3309 Filed 2–19–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4150–32–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Substance Abuse and Mental Health 

Services Administration 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Proposed Collection; 

Comment Request 

In compliance with Section 

3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 concerning 

opportunity for public comment on 

proposed collections of information, the 

Substance Abuse and Mental Health 

Services Administration (SAMHSA) 

will publish periodic summaries of 

proposed projects. To request more 

information on the proposed projects or 

to obtain a copy of the information 

collection plans, call the SAMHSA 

Reports Clearance Officer on (240) 276– 

1243. 

Comments are invited on: (a) Whether 

the proposed collections of information 

are necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

agency, including whether the 

information shall have practical utility; 

(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate 

of the burden of the proposed collection 

of information; (c) ways to enhance the 

quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information to be collected; and (d) 

ways to minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on 

respondents, including through the use 

of automated collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology. 

Proposed Project: Cross-Site Evaluation 

of the Garrett Lee Smith Memorial 

Suicide Prevention and Early 

Intervention Programs (OMB No. 0930– 

0286)—Revision 

The Substance Abuse and Mental 

Health Services Administration’s 

(SAMHSA) Center for Mental Health 

Services (CMHS) will continue to 

conduct the cross-site evaluation of the 

Garrett Lee Smith Memorial Youth 

Suicide Prevention and Early 

Intervention State/Tribal Programs and 


cprice-sewell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 34 / Monday, February 22, 2010 / Notices 7601 

the Garrett Lee Smith Memorial Youth 

Suicide Prevention Campus Programs. 

The data collected through the cross-site 

evaluation addresses four stages of 

program activity: (1) The context stage 

includes a review of program plans, 

such as grantee’s target population, 

target region, service delivery 

mechanisms, service delivery setting, 

types of program activities to be funded 

and evaluation activities; (2) the product 

stage describes the prevention strategies 

that are developed and utilized by 

grantees; (3) the process stage assesses 

progress on key activities and 

milestones related to implementation of 

program plans; and (4) the impact stage 

assesses the impact of the program on 

early identification, referral for services 

and service follow up of youth at risk. 

Additionally, to obtain a 

comprehensive understanding of the 

integration of community-based 

behavioral health services with services 

provided by college or university 

campuses, SAMHSA will conduct case 

studies of four exemplary Campus 

suicide prevention programs. Currently, 

case studies of two campus grantees are 

underway. The goal of the Campus Case 

Studies is to understand how a public 

health approach is successfully applied 

as a model for campus suicide 

prevention efforts, and will explore, in 

a systematic manner: The suicide 

prevention related infrastructures and 

supports (e.g., clinical and non-clinical) 

that exist on selected GLS-funded 

campuses; the various student-level 

factors that are related to suicide 

prevention efforts (e.g., protective 

factors, coping strategies, social norms, 

and facilitators and barriers to student 

access and receipt of behavioral 

healthcare); campus interdepartmental 

collaboration and the relationship 

between various efforts to promote 

student mental health and wellness; and 

the extent to which the campus 

infrastructures and supports promote 

and address these factors. 

To date, 86 State/Tribal grants and 93 

Campus grants have participated in the 

cross-site evaluation, since FY2007. 

Currently, 48 State/Tribal grants and 38 

Campus grants are participating in the 

cross-site evaluation. Data will continue 

to be collected from suicide prevention 

program staff (e.g., project directors, 

evaluators), key program stakeholders 

(e.g., state/local officials, child-serving 

agency directors, gatekeepers, mental 

health providers, and campus 

administrators), training participants, 

college students, and campus faculty/ 

staff through FY2012. 

Since the State/Tribal grantees differ 

from the campus grantees in 

programmatic approaches, specific data 

collection activities also vary by type of 

program. The following describes the 

specific data collection activities and 

data collection instruments to be used 

across State/Tribal and Campus grantees 

for the cross-site evaluation and the 

specific data collection instruments to 

be used by selected Campus grantees for 

the Campus Case Studies. While most of 

the data collection instruments 

described below are revised versions of 

instruments that have previously 

received OMB approval (OMB No. 

0930–0286 with Expiration Date: May 

2010) and are currently in use, the 

Training Utilization and Preservation— 

Survey (TUP–S) for State/Tribal 

grantees and the Training Exit Survey 

for Campus grantees (TES–C) are 

proposed as new instruments. The 

addition of these two new data 

collection activities, the inclusion of the 

Campus Case studies, and the revised 

estimate for number trained per site has 

increased the burden associated with 

the cross-site evaluation. A summary 

table of number of respondents and 

respondent burden has also been 

included. 

Data Collection Activities for State/ 

Tribal Grantees 

For State/Tribal grantees, the 

Prevention Strategies Inventory State/ 

Tribal (PSI–ST), Training Exit Survey 

State/Tribal (TES–ST), Referral Network 

Survey (RNS) and Training Utilization 

and Preservation—Interview (TUP–I) 

described below are revised versions of 

instruments that previously received 

OMB approval (OMB No. 0930–0286 

with Expiration Date: May 2010) and are 

currently in use. The Training Exit 

Survey—Cover Page State/Tribal (TES– 

CP–ST), Early Identification, Referral 

and Follow up Aggregate Screening 

Form (EIRF–S) and the Early 

Identification, Referral and Follow up 

Analysis (EIRF) are data abstraction 

activities utilizing existing data sources. 

The Training Utilization and 

Preservation—Survey (TUP–S) is 

proposed as a new data collection 

instrument. 

• Prevention Strategies InventoryState/Tribal (PSI–ST)—Revised. The 

Prevention Strategies Inventory will 

collect information on the suicide 

prevention strategies that grantees have 

developed and utilized. Prevention 

strategies include outreach and 

awareness, gatekeeper training, 

assessment and referral training for 

mental health professionals and hotline 

staff, lifeskills development programs, 

screening programs, hotlines and 

helplines, means restriction, policies 

and protocols for intervention and 

postvention, coalitions and 

partnerships, and direct services and 

traditional healing practices. Baseline 

data will be collected from the State/ 

Tribal grantees at the beginning of their 

grant cycle. Thereafter, they will 

complete the PSI–ST on a quarterly 

basis over the duration of their grant 

period. Baseline data will be collected 

on information on the types of 

prevention strategies grantees have 

developed and utilized, and the followup data collection asks the grantees to 

update the information they have 

provided on a quarterly basis over the 

period of the grant. On average, 48 

State/Tribal grantees will fill out the 

PSI–ST per year. One respondent from 

each site will be responsible for 

completing the survey. The survey will 

take approximately 45 minutes; 

however, the number of products, 

services and activities implemented 

under each strategy will determine the 

number of items each respondent will 

complete. The PSI–ST primarily has 

multiple choice questions with several 

open-ended questions. 

• Training Exit Survey State-Tribal 

Version (TES–ST)—Revised. The TES– 

ST will be administered to all 

participants in suicide prevention 

training activities immediately 

following their training experience in 

order to assess the content of the 

training, the participants’ intended use 

of the skills and knowledge learned and 

satisfaction with the training 

experience. The survey will also contain 

modules with questions tailored to 

specific types of training. It is estimated 

that approximately 94,848 trainees per 

year will respond to the TES–ST. The 

questions on the TES–ST are multiplechoice, Likert-scale, and open-ended. 

The survey includes about 33 items and 

will take approximately 10 minutes to 

complete. 

• Training Exit Survey Cover Page 

State/Tribal Version (TES–CP–ST)— 

Revised. State and Tribal grantees are 

required to report aggregate training 

participant information for all training 

conducted as part of their suicide 

prevention programs. These data are 

aggregated from existing data sources, 

some of which are attendance sheets, 

management information systems, etc. 

Grantees are responsible for aggregating 

these data and submitting to the crosssite evaluation team using the TES–CP– 

ST on a quarterly basis. It is estimated 

that abstracting this information will 

take 25 minutes. 

• Training Utilization and 

Preservation Survey (TUP–S)—New. 

The Training Utilization and 

Preservation Survey (TUP–S) is a 

quantitative, computer-assisted 

telephone interview that will be 


cprice-sewell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
7602 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 34 / Monday, February 22, 2010 / Notices 

administered to a random sample of 

trainees two months following the 

training. The TUP–S will assess trainee 

knowledge retention and gatekeeper 

behavior, particularly behavior related 

to identifying youth at risk. The 

TUP–S will ask trainees to provide 

demographic information about 

individuals they have identified at risk, 

information about the subsequent 

referrals or supports provided by the 

trainee, and any available information 

about services accessed by the at-risk 

individual. An average of 2,000 

participants per year will be sampled. 

The TUP–S includes 26 items and will 

take approximately 15 minutes to 

complete. 

• Training Utilization and 

Preservation Key Informant Interview 

(TUP–I)—Revised. The TUP–I is a 

qualitative follow-up interview that is 

targeted towards locally developed and 

understudied standardized training 

curricula as well as towards particular 

understudied gatekeeper trainee 

populations. The TUP–I will be 

administered to respondents two 

months following the training 

experience to assess whether the suicide 

prevention knowledge, skills or 

techniques learned through training 

were utilized and had an impact on 

youth. On average, the TUP–I will be 

administered to 100 respondents per 

year. The interviews are semistructured 

and open ended. The TUP–I includes 22 

items and will take approximately 40 

minutes to complete. 

• Referral Network Survey (RNS)— 

Revised. The Referral Network Survey 

(RNS) will be administered to 

representatives of youth-serving 

organizations or agencies that form 

referral networks supporting youth 

identified at risk. The RNS examines 

how collaboration and integration are 

used for sharing and transferring 

knowledge, resources, and technology 

among State/Tribal Program agencies 

and organizational stakeholders, how 

these networks influence referral 

mechanisms and service availability, 

policies and protocols regarding followup for youths who have attempted 

suicide and who are at risk for suicide, 

and access to electronic databases. Most 

State/Tribal grantees will select a single 

referral network for this survey, the 

average size of the network is 11 

agencies/organizations and there will be 

2 respondents per agency. The RNS will 

be administered to referral networks on 

an annual basis over the period of the 

grant. On average, 1,056 respondents 

per year will complete the RNS. 

Questions on the RNS are multiplechoice, Likert-scale, and open-ended. 

The RNS includes 28 items and will 

take approximately 40 minutes to 

complete. 

• Early Identification, Referral and 

Follow up Aggregate Screening Form 

(EIRF–S)—State/Tribal grantees are also 

required to report aggregate screening 

information for all youth screened as 

part of their suicide prevention 

programs. These data are aggregated 

from existing data sources. Grantees are 

responsible for aggregating these data 

and submitting to the cross-site 

evaluation team using the Early 

Identification, Referral and Follow up 

Aggregate Screening Form. Grantees are 

required to submit information on a 

quarterly basis, and it is estimated that 

abstracting this information will take 20 

minutes. 

• Early Identification, Referral and 

Follow Up Analyses (EIRF)—State/ 

Tribal grantees are required to share 

existing data with the cross-site 

evaluation team on the youth identified 

at risk as a result of early identification 

activities, the types of services these 

youth are referred for, and whether 

these youth receive services within 3 

months of the referral. Grantees are 

required to submit information on a 

quarterly basis, and it is estimated that 

abstracting this information will take 60 

minutes. 

Data Collection Activities for Campuses 

For Campus grantees, the Prevention 

Strategies Inventory-Campus Baseline 

and Follow Up (PSI–C), Suicide 

Prevention Exposure, Awareness and 

Knowledge Survey—Student Version 

(SPEAKS–S), Suicide Prevention 

Exposure, Awareness and Knowledge 

Survey—Faculty/StaffVersion 

(SPEAKS–FS) and Campus 

Infrastructure Interviews (CIFI) are 

revised versions of instruments that 

previously received OMB approval 

(OMB No. 0930–0286 with Expiration 

Date: May 2010) and are currently in 

use. The Training Exit Survey—Cover 

Page Campus (TES–CP–C) and MIS data 

abstraction are data abstraction 

activities utilizing existing data sources. 

The Training Exit Survey—Campus 

(TES–C) is proposed as a new data 

collection instrument. 

• Prevention Strategies InventoryCampus (PSI–C)—Revision. The 

Prevention Strategies Inventory will 

collect information on the suicide 

prevention strategies that grantees have 

developed and utilized. Prevention 

strategies include outreach and 

awareness, gatekeeper training, 

assessment and referral training for 

mental health professionals and hotline 

staff, lifeskills development activities, 

screening programs, hotlines and 

helplines, means restriction, policies 

and protocols for intervention and 

postvention, and coalitions and 

partnerships. The Campus grantees will 

first complete collect baseline data. 

Thereafter, they will collect follow-up 

data on a quarterly basis over the 

duration of their grant period. Baseline 

data will be collected on information on 

the types of prevention strategies 

grantees have developed and utilized, 

and the follow-up data collection asks 

the grantees to update the information 

they have provided on a quarterly basis 

over the period of the grant. On average, 

38 Campus grantees will fill out the 

PSI–C per year. One respondent from 

each site will be responsible for 

completing the survey. The survey will 

take approximately 45 minutes. 

However, the number of products, 

services and activities implemented 

under each strategy will determine the 

number of items to complete. The 

survey primarily has multiple choice 

questions with several open-ended 

questions. 

• Training Exit Survey Campus 

Version (TES–C)—New. The TES–C will 

be administered to all participants in 

suicide prevention training activities 

immediately following their training 

experience in order to assess the content 

of the training, the participants’ 

intended use of the skills and 

knowledge learned, and satisfaction 

with the training experience. The survey 

will also contain modules with 

questions tailored to specific types of 

training. It is estimated that 

approximately 23,712 trainees per year 

will respond to the Training Exit 

Survey. The questions on the TES–C are 

multiple-choice, Likert-scale, and openended. The survey includes about 33 

items and will take approximately 10 

minutes to complete. 

• Training Exit Survey Cover Page 

Campus Version (TES–CP–C)— 

Revision. State and Tribal grantees are 

required to report aggregate training 

participant information for all training 

conducted as part of their suicide 

prevention programs. These data are 

aggregated from existing data sources, 

some of which are attendance sheets, 

management information systems, etc. 

Grantees are responsible for aggregating 

these data and submitting to the crosssite evaluation team using the TES–CP– 

C data elements. Grantees are 

responsible for aggregating these data 

and submitting to the cross-site 

evaluation team using the TES–CP–C on 

a quarterly basis. It is estimated that 

abstracting this information will take 20 

minutes. 

• Suicide Prevention Exposure, 

Awareness and Knowledge Survey— 

Student Version (SPEAKS–S)— 


cprice-sewell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 34 / Monday, February 22, 2010 / Notices 7603 

Revision. This survey will examine: The 

exposure of campus populations to 

suicide prevention initiatives; 

awareness of appropriate crisis 

interventions, supports, services, and 

resources for mental health seeking; 

knowledge of myths and facts related to 

suicide and suicide prevention; 

perceived and personal stigma related to 

depression and mental health seeking; 

and behaviors related to seeking help 

and referring for mental health services. 

This survey will be administered 

annually over the grant period. It is 

estimated that 7,600 students per year 

will respond to the SPEAKS–S. The 

SPEAKS–S is web-based and includes 

multiple-choice, Likert-scale and true/ 

false questions. The SPEAKS–Student 

Version includes 85 items and will take 

approximately 25 minutes to complete. 

• Suicide Prevention Exposure, 

Awareness and Knowledge Survey— 

(SPEAKS–FS)—Revision. The SPEAKS– 

FS assesses the exposure, awareness and 

knowledge of suicide prevention 

activities among faculty/staff on campus 

as a result of the suicide prevention 

program. Questions include whether 

faculty/staff have been exposed to 

suicide prevention materials, their 

agreement with myths and facts about 

suicide, and the availability of resources 

to provide assistance to those at risk for 

suicide. This survey will be 

administered annually over the grant 

period. It is estimated that 1,900 faculty/ 

staff per year will respond to the 

SPEAKS FS. The SPEAKS–FS is webbased and includes multiple-choice, 

Likert-scale and true/false questions. 

The survey includes 54 items and will 

take approximately 15 minutes to 

complete. 

• Campus Infrastructure Interviews 

(CIFI)—Revision. CIFI is designed to 

gather information around campus 

infrastructure, program, policy, and 

planning related to suicide prevention; 

it involves key informant interviews 

conducted by the cross-site evaluation 

team via teleconference for each campus 

twice during the life of the grant. These 

semistructured interviews are 

conducted with up to five site 

representatives to gather information 

from multiple and varied perspectives 

on campus-based infrastructure 

development around suicide prevention 

activities. These representatives 

include: (1) Administrator, (2) Student 

Leader, (3) Counseling Center Staff, (4) 

Faculty/Staff-human services 

department, and (5) Faculty/Staff-nonhuman service department. Questions 

on the Campus Infrastructure Interview 

include whether respondents are aware 

of suicide prevention activities, what 

the campus culture is related to suicide 

prevention, and what specific efforts are 

in place to prevent suicide among the 

campus population. Questions will 

include close-ended background 

questions, with the remaining questions 

being open-ended and semi-structured. 

It is estimated that on average 64 

respondents per year will respond to 

CIFI. The Campus Infrastructure 

Interviews include 29 items and will 

take approximately 60 minutes to 

complete. 

• MIS Data Abstraction: For the crosssite evaluation of the Campus programs, 

existing program data related to student 

retention rate, student use of mental 

health services and student use of 

emergency services will be requested 

from Campuses once a year. It is 

estimated that abstracting this 

information will take 60 minutes. 

Data Collection Activities for Campus 

Case Studies 

For Campus Case Studies, the 

instruments described below are 

currently used by 2 Campus grantees. 

These instruments are proposed for 4 

additional Campus grantees. The 

Campus Case Studies will take place 

over the period of the grant. 

• Student Focus Group Moderator’s 

Guide. This component will assess 

student risk and protective factors 

related to mental health, help-seeking 

behaviors, and knowledge of prevention 

activities on campus and their perceived 

effectiveness. This will help researchers 

more fully understand student-level 

factors in relation to population-level 

factors addressed by the SPEAKS–S. 

Questions address stressors that 

different groups of students face while 

in college, barriers to seeking help, 

attitudes and stigma related to seeking 

help, and the accessibility of the 

campus counseling center. Six focus 

groups will be conducted on each 

campus once over the data collection 

period. The following groups of 

students will potentially be represented 

in the focus groups, as decided by the 

campus: (1) First-year students, (2) 

athletes, (3) international students, (4) 

Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender 

(LGBT) students, (5) Greek life students, 

(6) graduate students, and (7) residential 

advisors/peer educators. Recruitment 

will be conducted by campus project 

staff. Focus groups will include a 

maximum of 9 students. It is estimated 

that on average 216 students will 

participate in focus groups. Groups will 

last approximately 90 minutes. 

• Faculty/Staff Focus Group 

Moderator’s Guide. The faculty and staff 

focus groups will assess the campus’ 

approach to prevention, attitudes and 

stigma around student mental health 

and wellness on campus, campus 

infrastructure supports for students who 

need mental health help, and the 

general campus climate around mental 

health and wellness. Faculty and staff 

will also describe their knowledge of 

prevention activities on campus and 

their perceived effectiveness of these 

efforts. Local campus staff will recruit 

appropriate respondents for the faculty 

and staff focus groups to include a 

maximum of 9 respondents per group. 

Two faculty focus groups and one staff 

focus group will be conducted on each 

campus once over the period of data 

collection. It is estimated that 108 

faculty/staff will participate in focus 

groups. The groups will last 

approximately 90 minutes. 

• Case Study Key Informant 

Interviews (7 versions). The Case Study 

Key Informant Interviews (CSIs) include 

7 qualitative interview versions: (1) 

Administrator, (2) Counseling Staff, (3) 

Coalition Member—Faculty, (4) 

Prevention Staff, (5) Case Finder, (6) 

Campus Police, and (7) Student Leader. 

Local project staff will be responsible 

for identifying appropriate respondents 

for each CSI version and scheduling the 

interview to occur during site visits by 

the case study team. Seven individuals 

from each of the campus sites will be 

selected as key informants to participate 

in the CSIs in each of the two stages of 

the GLS Campus Case Studies. 

Questions on the CSIs include whether 

respondents are aware of suicide 

prevention activities, what the campus 

culture is related to suicide prevention, 

and what specific efforts are in place to 

prevent suicide among the campus 

population. Items are formatted as openended and semi-structured questions. 

The CSIs include 16 to 21 items and 

will take approximately 60 minutes to 

complete. On the second site visit, the 

case study team will incorporate 

preliminary findings from the case 

studies in the interviews, which may be 

modified to some extent to collect more 

comprehensive information and gather 

feedback from local key informants 

surrounding the context of the 

preliminary findings. It is estimated that 

the CSI will be administered to 56 

respondents. The CSIs for the second 

site visit will last 60 minutes. 

Internet-based technology will 

continue to be used for collecting data 

via Web-based surveys, and for data 

entry and management. The average 

annual respondent burden is estimated 

below. The estimate reflects the average 

annual number of respondents, the 

average annual number of responses, the 

time it will take for each response, and 

the average annual burden. While the 

different cohorts of grantees finish their 


cprice-sewell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
7604 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 34 / Monday, February 22, 2010 / Notices 

grants at different times, we have 

assumed that new cohorts will replace 

previous cohorts. Therefore, the number 

of grantees in each year is assumed to 

be constant. 

TABLE—ESTIMATES OF ANNUALIZED HOUR BURDEN

Measure name Number of 

respondents 

Number of 

responses/ 

respondent 

Hours/ 

response 

Response 

burden 

(in hours) 

State/Tribal Cross-Site Evaluation Instruments 

Prevention Strategies Inventory—State Tribal (PSI–ST) .............................. 48 4 0 .75 144 

Training Exit Survey State/Tribal (TES–ST) .................................................. 94,848 1 0 .17 16,125 

Training Utilization and Penetration Survey (TUP–S) ................................... 2,000 1 0 .25 500 

Training Utilization and Penetration Interview (TUP–I) ................................. 100 1 0 .67 67 

Referral Network Survey (RNS) .................................................................... 1,024 1 0 .67 687 

Early Identification, Referral and Follow Up Analysis (EIRF) ........................ 48 4 1 192 

Early Identification, Referral and Follow Up Aggregate Screening Form 

(EIRF–S) .................................................................................................... 48 4 0 .33 64 

Training Exit Survey Cover Page State/Tribal (TES–CP–ST) ...................... 48 4 0 .33 64 

Campus Cross-Site Evaluation Instruments 

Prevention Strategies Inventory—Campus (PSI–C) ...................................... 38 4 0 .75 114 

Training Exit Survey Campus (TES–C) ......................................................... 23,712 1 0 .17 4,032 

Suicide Prevention Exposure, Awareness and Knowledge Survey—Student Version (SPEAKS–S) ......................................................................... 7,600 1 0 .42 3,192 

Suicide Prevention Exposure, Awareness and Knowledge Survey—Faculty/Staff (SPEAKS–FS) ............................................................................. 1,900 1 0 .25 475 

Campus Infrastructure Interview (CIFI) for Student ...................................... 38 1 0 .75 29 

Campus Infrastructure Interview (CIFI) for Faculty ....................................... 76 1 0 .75 57 

Campus Infrastructure Interview (CIFI) for Administrator .............................. 38 1 0 .75 29 

Campus Infrastructure Interview (CIFI) for Counselor .................................. 38 1 0 .75 29 

Training Exit Survey Cover Page Campus (TES–CP–C) ............................. 38 4 0 .33 51 

MIS Data Abstraction ..................................................................................... 38 4 0 .33 51 

Campus Case Studies Evaluation Instruments 

Focus Group—Student Version ..................................................................... 216 1 1 .5 324 

Focus Group—Faculty Version ..................................................................... 72 1 1 .5 108 

Focus Group—Staff Version .......................................................................... 36 1 1 .5 54 

Interview—Student Leader Version ............................................................... 8 1 1 8 

Interview—Case Finder Version .................................................................... 4 1 1 4 

Interview—Faculty Version ............................................................................ 8 1 1 8 

Interview—Campus Police Version ............................................................... 8 1 1 8 

Interview—Counseling Staff Version ............................................................. 8 1 1 8 

Interview—Prevention Staff Version .............................................................. 12 1 1 12 

Interview—Administrator Version .................................................................. 8 1 1 8 

Total ........................................................................................................ ........................ 132,060 .......................... 26,444 

Send comments to Summer King, 

SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer, 

Room 7–1044, One Choke Cherry Road, 

Rockville, MD 20857 and e-mail a copy 

to summer.king@samhsa.hhs.gov. 

Written comments should be received 

within 60 days of this notice. 

Dated: February 5, 2010. 

Elaine Parry, 

Director, Office of Program Services. 

[FR Doc. 2010–3326 Filed 2–19–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4162–20–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Food and Drug Administration 

[Docket No. FDA–2010–N–0079] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Proposed Collection; 

Comment Request; Experimental 

Study of Graphic Cigarette Warning 

Labels 

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, 

HHS. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug 

Administration (FDA) is announcing an 

opportunity for public comment on the 

proposed collection of certain 

information by the agency. Under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the 

PRA), Federal agencies are required to 

publish notice in the Federal Register 

concerning each proposed collection of 

information, and to allow 60 days for 

public comment in response to the 

notice. This notice solicits comments on 

the Experimental Study of Graphic 

Cigarette Warning Labels that is being 

conducted in support of the graphic 

label statement provision of the Family 

Smoking Prevention and Tobacco 

Control Act (the Tobacco Control Act). 

DATES: Submit written or electronic 

comments on the collection of 

information by April 23, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: Submit electronic 

comments on the collection of 

information to http:// 


cprice-sewell on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES