alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,870,720
<SECURITIES>                                    19,472
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,895,679
<ALLOWANCES>                                    28,934
<INVENTORY>                                  2,507,609
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,416,266
<PP&E>                                       9,910,366
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,372,720
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,099,553
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,458,777
<BONDS>                                        739,045
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,496,690
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,401,942
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,099,553
<SALES>                                     13,760,981
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,861,103
<CGS>                                       11,758,796
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,133,965
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,067
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,847
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                933,398
<INCOME-TAX>                                   371,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            562,398
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   562,398
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered PublicAccounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements (Form S-8 No. 333-21489, 333-21491 and 333-111618)pertaining to the 1995 Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors,  1995 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan and the1999 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan of Systemax Inc. of our reports dated March 16,2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule ofSystemax Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting of Systemax Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) forthe year ended December 31, 2008.

 
|                | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP |
|---------------------|--------------------------------|
|                |                           |
| New York, New York  |                           |
| March 16, 2009 |                           |

 

----
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


The Board of Directors
INTERLINQ Software Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 33-63388, 333-04558 and 333-21099) on Form S-8 of INTERLINQ Software
Corporation of our report dated August 6, 1999, relating to the balance sheets
of INTERLINQ Software Corporation as of June 30, 1999 and 1998, and the related
statements of income, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended June 30, 1999, and the related schedule, which
report appears in the June 30, 1999 annual report on Form 10-K of INTERLINQ
Software Corporation.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Seattle, Washington
September 23, 1999

                                       51
### The quality of the surface waters of California

By: Walton Van WinkleFrederick M. Eaton

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp237

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Date: December 14, 2011

Subject: The Effect on the Mercury Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) Floor of Not Subcategorizing Mercury Emissions for all Coal-fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units

From: Jeffrey Cole (RTI International)

To: Bill Maxwell OAQPS/SPPD/ESG (D243-01) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

The EPA requested that RTI calculate the Hg MACT floor value resulting from a subcategory containing all coal -fired electric utility steam generating units (i.e., non-low rank virgin coal and low rank virgin coal). The Hg MACT floor is based on 12 percent of the emissions data collected by EPA in the recent information collection request (ICR). The data set for this subcategory would include 398 emission averages. This would result in 48 (398 x 0.12) units being represented in the MACT floor. The resulting MACT floor value would be
1.11 rounded to 1.2 lb/TBtu.

The reason for this MACT floor value being es sentially equivalent to the Hg MACT floor value for the same subcategory without low rank vi rgin coal-fired boilers is that, even by adding the low rank virgin coal data (11 emission aver ages) into the MACT pool , it still does not bring the lowest Hg emitting low rank virgin coal-fired boiler into the new MACT floor data pool of 48 emission averages.
§ 186.1300 Ferric oxide. ( a ) Ferric oxide (iron (III) oxide, Fe2O3, CAS Reg. No. 1309-37-1) occurs naturally as the mineral hematite. It may be prepared synthetically by heating brown iron hydroxide oxide. The product is red-brown to black trigonal crystals.
( b ) In accordance with § 186.1(b)(1), the ingredient is used as an indirect human food ingredient with no limitation other than current good manufacturing practice. The affirmation of this ingredient as generally recognized as safe (GRAS) as an indirect human food ingredient is based upon the following current good manufacturing practice conditions of use: ( 1 ) The ingredient is used as a constituent of paper and paperboard used for food packaging.
( 2 ) The ingredient is used at levels not to exceed current good manufacturing practice.
( c ) Prior sanctions for this ingredient different from the uses established in this section do not exist or have been waived.
[53 FR 16867, May 12, 1988; 53 FR 20939, June 7, 1988]
§ 346.3 Definitions. As used in this part: ( a ) *Analgesic, anesthetic drug.* A topically (externally) applied drug that relieves pain by depressing cutaneous sensory receptors.
( b ) *Anorectal drug.* A drug that is used to relieve symptoms caused by anorectal disorders in the anal canal, perianal area, and/or the lower rectal areas.
( c ) *Antipruritic drug.* A topically (externally) applied drug that relieves itching by depressing cutaneous sensory receptors.
( d ) *Astringent drug.* A drug that is applied topically (externally) to the skin or mucous membranes for a local and limited protein coagulant effect.
( e ) *External use.* Topical application of an anorectal drug product to the skin of the perianal area and/or the skin of the anal canal.
( f ) *Intrarectal use.* Topical application of an anorectal drug product to the mucous membrane of the rectum.
( g ) *Keratolytic drug.* A drug that causes desquamation (loosening) and debridement or sloughing of the surface cells of the epidermis.
( h ) *Local anesthetic drug.* A drug that produces local disappearance of pain, burning, itching, irritation, and/or discomfort by reversibly blocking nerve conduction when applied to nerve tissue in appropriate concentrations.
( i ) *Protectant drug.* A drug that provides a physical barrier, forming a protective coating over skin or mucous membranes.
( j ) *Vasoconstrictor.* A drug that causes temporary constriction of blood vessels.
Editorial Note on Part 172
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 172 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; 70 FR 72074, Dec. 1, 2005; and 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 172.803 Advantame. ( a ) Advantame is the chemical *N*-[*N*-[3-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)propyl]-α-aspartyl]-L-phenylalanine 1-methyl ester, monohydrate (CAS Reg. No. 714229-20-6).
( b ) Advantame meets the following specifications when it is tested according to the methods described or referenced in the document entitled “Specifications and Analytical Methods for Advantame” dated April 1, 2009, by the Ajinomoto Co. Inc., Sweetener Department 15-1, Kyobashi 1-chome, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-8315, Japan. The Director of the Office of the Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies are available from the Office of Food Additive Safety (HFS-200), Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Food and Drug Administration, 5001 Campus Dr., College Park, MD 20740, 240-402-1200. Copies may be examined at the Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852, 240-402-7500, between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030 or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html .* ( 1 ) Assay for advantame, not less than 97.0 percent and not more than 102.0 percent on a dry basis.
( 2 ) Free *N*-[*N*-[3-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)propyl]-α-aspartyl]-L-phenylalanine, not more than 1.0 percent.
( 3 ) Total other related substances, not more than 1.5 percent.
( 4 ) Lead, not more than 1.0 milligram per kilogram.
( 5 ) Water, not more than 5.0 percent.
( 6 ) Residue on ignition, not more than 0.2 percent.
( 7 ) Specific rotation, determined at20 °C [α]D: −45.0 to −38.0° calculated on a dry basis.
( c ) The food additive advantame may be safely used as a sweetening agent and flavor enhancer in foods generally, except in meat and poultry, in accordance with current good manufacturing practice, in an amount not to exceed that reasonably required to achieve the intended technical effect, in foods for which standards of identity established under section 401 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act do not preclude such use.
( d ) If the food containing the additive purports to be or is represented to be for special dietary use, it must be labeled in compliance with part 105 of this chapter.
[79 FR 29085, May 21, 2014, as amended at 88 FR 17720, Mar. 24, 2023]
================================================================================

[PORTIONS OF THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN REDACTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION.]

                                  APPENDIX A-4

                                    PRODUCTS


Product Name:     INSTANT ABS - AB-64

Product Description: Fitness Machine to exercise abdominal muscles

Projected Units Sold next 24 months: XXXXXX

Manufacturer:     CirTran-Asia

Sub-Manufacturer: Zhejiang Hengtai Machinary Manufacturing Co., Ltd

Marketing Partner Contact Info:     Tri-Star


Current Sale Price: $XXXXXX USD - CIRTRAN-ASIA

Current Cost to Manufacturer:       $XXXXXX USD

Total Tooling/Development Costs:    $30,000 USD

Gross Profit Margin Per Unit - $2.40

CirTran-Asia               $  .70 USD
Charles Ho                 $ 1.70 USD

INSTANT ABS Stock Option Schedule

Upon full execution of this Agreement, Cirtran's parent CirTran Corporation will
issue the following options to purchase restricted common stock:

                     Charles Ho                500,000 shares

These initial options will vest and be exercisable only after Cirtran has sold
100,000 INSTANT ABS units. The options will be exercisable at $.06 per share
after vesting. The options will expire and will no longer be exercisable on the
date one year after the date hereof.

In addition, for each whole multiple of 50,000 AB KING units sold by Cirtran
during the first 24 months of this Agreement in excess of the initial 100,000
units, CirTran Corporation will grant Charles Ho an option to purchase 100,000
shares. Each such additional option will be exercisable for a period of 12
months at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of CirTran
Corporation stock on the date of grant (i.e. the mean between the high bid and
low asked prices for the stock for the date of determination).



As a condition to grant of the options, each option holder will be required to
make standard investment representations to CirTran Corporation.

[XXXXX - REDACTED PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT AND FILED
SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION.]


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
38198.

#### LUNSFORD v. LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY *et al.*

Decided September 29, 1960.

*Hewlett, Hewlett & Wall, Sam D. Hewlett, Jr.,*for plaintiff in error.

*Iieyman, Abram & Young, Herman Heyman,*contra.

Townsend, Judge.

The judgment of this court reversing the judgment of the superior court which sustained the general demurrer to the petition having been reversed by the Supreme Court of Georgia *(Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Lunsford,*216 Ga. 289) and the original judgment of this court having been vacated, the judgment of the superior court sustaining the general demurrer to the petition is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Carlisle and Frankum, JJ., concur. Gardner, P. J., not participating.*
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                              ALTRIS SOFTWARE, INC.

                 STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
                 ________________________________________________

                                   (Unaudited)


                                                          For the three months
                                                            ended March 31,
                                                        ------------------------
                                                           1997          1996
                                                        ----------    ----------
Net income per consolidated financial statements        $  534,000    $  677,000

Primary net income per share:
Weighted average common shares                           9,565,000     9,027,000
Common stock equivalents:
  Common stock options                                      82,000       380,000
                                                        ----------    ----------
Weighted average shares outstanding                      9,647,000     9,407,000
                                                        ----------    ----------
Fully diluted net income per share:
Weighted average common shares                           9,565,000     9,027,000
Common stock equivalents:
  Common stock options                                      82,000       380,000
                                                        ----------    ----------
Weighted average shares outstanding                      9,647,000     9,407,000
                                                        ----------    ----------
Net income per share:
  Primary                                               $      .06    $      .07
                                                        ----------    ----------
                                                        ----------    ----------
  Fully diluted                                         $      .06    $      .07
                                                        ----------    ----------
                                                        ----------    ----------

                                       14
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-7137

CHRISTOPHER PAGE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

UNKNOWN CORRECTIONAL OFFICER; SGT. KREGOR; UNKNOWN 

MEDICAL STAFF MEMBERS DOCTOR BUCKHAM; COUNTY OF PITT,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. Richard E. Myers, II, Chief District Judge. (5:21-ct-03007-M)

Submitted: November 18, 2021 Decided: November 22, 2021

Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher Page, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Page appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his

42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. Page v. Unknown Corr. Officer, No. 5:21-ct-03007-M (E.D.N.C. July 19, 

2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 384 

Congratulating the Webster University chess team for winning a recordbreaking fifth consecutive national title at the President’s Cup collegiate 

chess championship in New York City. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 14, 2017 

Mrs. WAGNER (for herself and Mr. CLAY) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the Webster University chess team for winning a record-breaking fifth consecutive national title 

at the President’s Cup collegiate chess championship in 

New York City. 

Whereas Webster University is the first team in the history 

of the President’s Cup collegiate chess championship to 

win 5 consecutive national titles; 

Whereas the 2017 victory is the seventh consecutive national 

championship for Grandmaster and coach Susan Polgar 

and the program at the Susan Polgar Institute for Chess 

Excellence; 

Whereas Webster University is a leader in promoting chess 

as a vehicle for enriching the education of children and 

young adults; and 


rfrederick on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 384 IH 

Whereas Webster University has become a hub for developing 

chess excellence in students from across the United 

States and around the world: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) congratulates Webster University for win3 ning a record-breaking fifth consecutive national 

4 title at the President’s Cup collegiate chess cham5 pionship; and 

6 (2) encourages Webster University to continue 

7 promoting the educational benefits of chess among 

8 its students and the larger community. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit
32(a)**
 
 **Certification
of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350**
 **(Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**
 
 Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Republic Bancorp Inc. (the
“Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the Company’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 (the
“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date:
      August 8, 2005
    /s/
      Dana M. CluckeyName:
      Dana M. CluckeyTitle:
      President and Chief Executive Officer
 
 The
foregoing certification (i) accompanies the filing and is being furnished solely
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, (ii) will not be deemed “filed” for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the
liability of that section, and (iii) will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act,
except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by
reference.
 
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Republic Bancorp Inc. and will be retained
by Republic Bancorp Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.