alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1306.04 Purpose of issue of prescription. ( a ) A prescription for a controlled substance to be effective must be issued for a legitimate medical purpose by an individual practitioner acting in the usual course of his professional practice. The responsibility for the proper prescribing and dispensing of controlled substances is upon the prescribing practitioner, but a corresponding responsibility rests with the pharmacist who fills the prescription. An order purporting to be a prescription issued not in the usual course of professional treatment or in legitimate and authorized research is not a prescription within the meaning and intent of section 309 of the Act (21 U.S.C. 829) and the person knowingly filling such a purported prescription, as well as the person issuing it, shall be subject to the penalties provided for violations of the provisions of law relating to controlled substances.
( b ) A prescription may not be issued in order for an individual practitioner to obtain controlled substances for supplying the individual practitioner for the purpose of general dispensing to patients.
( c ) A prescription may not be issued for “detoxification treatment” or “maintenance treatment,” unless the prescription is for a Schedule III, IV, or V narcotic drug approved by the Food and Drug Administration specifically for use in maintenance or detoxification treatment and the practitioner is in compliance with requirements in § 1301.28 of this chapter.
( d ) A prescription may be issued by a qualifying practitioner, as defined in section 303(g)(2)G)(iii) of the Act (21 U.S.C. 823(g)(2)(G)(iii), in accordance with § 1306.05 for a Schedule III, IV, or V controlled substance for the purpose of maintenance or detoxification treatment for the purposes of administration in accordance with section 309A of the Act (21 U.S.C. 829a) and § 1306.07(f). Such prescription issued by a qualifying practitioner shall not be used to supply any practitioner with a stock of controlled substances for the purpose of general dispensing to patients.
[36 FR 7799, Apr. 24, 1971. Redesignated at 38 FR 26609, Sept. 24, 1973, and amended at 39 FR 37986, Oct. 25, 1974; 70 FR 36343, June 23, 2005; 85 FR 69167, Nov. 2, 2020]
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 23.2


             [DAVID CHRISTENSEN CPA & CONSULTANT, PLLC LETTERHEAD]





June 19, 1998


Washington Banking Company
1421 SW Barlow Street
Oak Harbor, Washington 98277

RE: CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT

To: The Board of Directors
    Washington Banking Company

I consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
Washington Banking Corporation on Form S-8 of the report of David O. Christensen
Certified Public Accountants & Consultants (now known as David Christensen CPA
and Consultant, PLLC) dated January 31, 1997, except Note 16 that is dated April
24, 1998, on the audits of the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes of
Washington Banking Company as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, all of which were
incorporated by reference in the SB-2 Registration Statement.

I also consent to the reference to David O. Christensen Certified Public
Accountants & Consultants under the caption "Experts" in the Registration
Statement and the Prospectus relating thereto, and the filing of this letter as
an Exhibit to the Registration Statement.


Very truly yours,

/s/ DAVID O. CHRISTENSEN
-------------------------
David O. Christensen
#### § 422.10 Reporting to USDA.

Following completion of an investigation into allegations of research misconduct, the institution conducting extramural research must provide to the ARIO a copy of the evidentiary record, the report of the investigation, recommendations made to the institution's adjudicating official, the adjudicating official's determination, the institution's corrective action taken or planned, and the written response of the individual who is the subject of the allegation to any recommendations.
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket Nos. 43781/43782

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

BRANDON JACK TIMPSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 629

Filed: August 4, 2016

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada

County. Hon. Samuel A. Hoagland; Hon. Steven J. Hippler, District Judges. 

Judgments of conviction and concurrent unified sentences of four years, with one 

year determinate, for obtaining a controlled substance by fraud; twenty-five years, 

with six years determinate, for robbery; and seven years, with two years 

determinate, for possession of hydromorphone, affirmed.

Eric D. Fredericksen, Interim State Appellate Public Defender; Maya P. Waldron, 

Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GUTIERREZ, Judge; GRATTON, Judge;

and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

In Docket No. 43781, Brandon Jack Timpson pled guilty to obtaining a controlled 

substance by fraud, Idaho Code § 37-2734(a)(3). The district court imposed a unified sentence 

of four years, with a minimum period of confinement of one year. In Docket No. 43782, 

Timpson pled guilty to robbery, I.C. §§ 18-6501, 18-204, and possession of hydromorphone, I.C. 

§ 37-2732(c). The district court imposed concurrent unified sentences of twenty-five years, with 

a minimum period of confinement of six years, and seven years, with a minimum period of 
2

confinement of two years, respectively. Timpson appeals, contending that his sentences are

excessive.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Timpson’s judgments of conviction and sentences are affirmed.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

- 1 -

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 98-20584

Summary Calendar

_____________________

MICHAEL RICHIE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

GARY JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT

OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; CAROL

VANCE; ELLEN J. HALBERT, Vice Chairwoman,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 97-CV-1027

August 31, 1999

Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Michael Richie, Texas inmate # 349726, appeals pro se the

dismissal, for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be

granted, of his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 civil rights action. He contends

that his due process rights were violated when the Texas Department

of Criminal Justice refused to restore good-time credit which he 

lost on return to prison after revocation of his parole. Unlike in
- 2 -

district court, Richie does not assert that his equal protection

rights and the Ex Post Facto Clause were violated. Those claims,

therefore, are deemed abandoned. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d

222, 223-24 (5th Cir. 1993).

Because Richie lacks a constitutionally protected liberty

interest in the restoration of the good-time credit, he fails to

state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See Hallmark v.

Johnson, 118 F.3d 1073, 1079-80 (5th Cir.) cert. denied, 118 S. Ct.

576 (1997). Accordingly, the dismissal of his action is

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 3 (Wednesday, January 5, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 584]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-33339]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLAZ910000.L12100000.XP0000LXSS150A00006100.241A]


State of Arizona Resource Advisory Council Meeting

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Arizona Resource Advisory Council Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
of 1976 and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972, the U.S. 
Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Arizona 
Resource Advisory Council (RAC), will meet on February 3, 2011, at the 
BLM National Training Center located at 9828 North 31st Avenue in 
Phoenix from 8 a.m. until 4:30 p.m. Agenda items include: BLM State 
Director's update on statewide programs and issues; presentation on 
water; updates on the Renewable Energy Strategy, Restoration Design 
Energy Project Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), and 
Northern Arizona Proposed Mineral Withdrawal Draft EIS; RAC questions 
on BLM District Managers' Reports; and reports by the RAC working 
groups. A public comment period will be provided at 11:30 a.m. on 
February 3, 2011, for any interested members of the public who wish to 
address the Council on BLM programs and business.
    Under the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act, the RAC has 
been designated as the Recreation Resource Advisory Council (RRAC), and 
has the authority to review all BLM and Forest Service (FS) recreation 
fee proposals in Arizona. The RRAC will not review any recreation fee 
proposals at this meeting.

DATES: Effective Date: February 3, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dorothea Boothe, Bureau of Land 
Management, Arizona State Office, One North Central Avenue, Suite 800, 
Phoenix, Arizona 85004-4427, 602-417-9504.

    Dated: December 28, 2010.
James G. Kenna,
Arizona State Director.
[FR Doc. 2010-33339 Filed 1-4-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-32-P
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Annual Report of Independence CommunityBank Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for theperiod ending December 31, 2004 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Alan H. Fishman, President andChief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Company.     /s/ Alan H. Fishman           Alan H. Fishman *President and Chief Executive Officer*March 11, 2005     A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided toIndependence Community Bank Corp. and will be retained byIndependence Community Bank Corp. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AS RESTATED
FOUND ON PAGES 2 AND 3 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE YEAR TO DATE JUNE 30,
1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                             901
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,396
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        460
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,687
<PP&E>                                           6,819
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,728
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  17,452
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,110
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        59,769
<OTHER-SE>                                    (49,887)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    17,452
<SALES>                                         10,132
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,132
<CGS>                                            4,775
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,775
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,756
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (47)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (612)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (612)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (612)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)
        

</TABLE>
‘. . 

OFFICE OF 7’HE ATiORNEY QENERAL OF ‘t’ElCA# 

AUBTIN 

of roesat date Nodia& u follow: 

or EMload couuty 

it om o.Bll ror 

ZI, and aotbor o? 

8 a t l lo nr lnt- 
.C 

-c 

to l r4oloro brewlth a 0 

T 

of Opinion 0-64Ob, mhleh 

o p iniol n nuarrdor the boa& mat o n06 ln ch4ptof 1 ritlo’la, 

baa moh w rlfooto6,b7 tb qdnfoa 0r tho 00urt In th0 c00hr8n Couat7 Quo*
[No. 41172-1-I.

Division One.

December 1, 1997.]

#### The City of Seattle, *Petitioner,*v. Ian Washburn, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 96-1-05630-4, Ricardo S. Martinez, J., entered July 22, 1997. *Reversed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Tonga  Capital  Corp  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report").  I,
Charles T.  Phillips,  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer of the  company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.




                                         /s/ Charles T. Phillips
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Charles T. Phillips, President
Dated: November 22, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 247 (Monday, December 27, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 81204]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32303]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT


Notice of Public Information Collection Requirements Submitted to 
OMB for Review

SUMMARY: U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has 
submitted the following information collection to OMB for review and 
clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. 
Comments regarding this information collection are best assured of 
having their full effect if received within 30 days of this 
notification. Comments should be addressed to: Desk Officer for USAID, 
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB), Washington, DC 20503. Copies of submission may be 
obtained by calling (202) 712-1365.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    OMB Number: OMB 0412-New.
    Form Number: N/A.
    Title: USAID Visa Compliance System (VCS).
    Type of Submission: New Information Collection.
    Purpose: The U.S. Agency for International Development, under the 
Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as amended, engages in a broad range of 
sustainable economic assistance activities that provide technical and 
academic training in the United States and abroad for foreign 
nationals. These foreign nationals have been selected for training by 
USAID in order to advance U.S. foreign policy objectives by supporting: 
Economic growth, agriculture and trade; global health; and democracy 
conflict prevention and humanitarian assistance. Training can consist 
of long-term academic degree programs, short-term technical courses, 
seminars, workshops, or other learning activities intended to impart 
certain knowledge and information.
    USAID must tract training data for all foreign nationals who 
receive training funded by USAID. In cases where foreign nationals must 
travel to the U.S. to participate in training or invitational travel, 
the approvals for the eligibility to obtain the J visa are captured in 
the Visa Compliance System (VCS). The Visa Compliance system has two 
purposes: First, to secure a J-1 visa for these foreign nationals 
traveling to the US.; second, to enable USAID to be in compliance with 
external requirements of the Department of Homeland Security. With 
certain exceptions, the foreign nationals that USAID sponsors for 
travel to the U.S. are considered exchange visitors. The VCS provides 
an audit trail regarding exchange visitor, his or her training program 
or circumstances, as well as other relevant documentation.
    Annual Reporting Burden: Respondents: 600.
    Total annual responses: 8,000.
    Total annual hours requested: 2,000 hours.

    Dated: December 15, 2010.
Lynn P. Winston,
Acting Chief, Information and Records Division, Office of Management 
Services, Bureau for Management.
[FR Doc. 2010-32303 Filed 12-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6116-01-M
<PAGE>   1
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549


                                    FORM 8-K
                                 CURRENT REPORT


                     Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
                         Securities Exchange Act of 1934



Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported) November 5, 1998

                              THE LOEWEN GROUP INC.
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



<TABLE>
<S>                                   <C>                       <C>       
    British Columbia, Canada                  0-18429                     98-0121376
(State or other jurisdiction of       (Commission File Number)  (IRS Employer Identification No.)
      incorporation)
</TABLE>



  4126 Norland Avenue, Burnaby, British Columbia                 V5G 3S8
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    (Address of principal executive offices)                    (zip code)



Registrant's telephone number, including area code      604-299-9321
                                                    --------------------


                                       N/A
          (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)


                                                      Exhibit Index is on page 3
                                                                     Page 1 of 6


<PAGE>   2
ITEM 5.     OTHER EVENTS.

Pursuant to Form 8-K, General Instructions F, registrant hereby incorporates by
reference the press release attached hereto as Exhibit 99.


ITEM 7.     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND EXHIBITS.

            Exhibit No.      Description

            Exhibit 99       The Loewen Group Inc. Press Release dated 
                             November 5, 1998


                                   SIGNATURES

               Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by
the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

Dated: November 5, 1998

                                    THE LOEWEN GROUP INC.



                                    By:  /s/ BRADLEY D. STAM
                                        -------------------------------
                                    Name:       Bradley D. Stam
                                    Title:      Senior Vice President, Law


<PAGE>   3
                                  EXHIBIT INDEX


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  Sequential
Number      Exhibit                                               Page Number
------      -------                                               -----------
<S>         <C>                                                   <C>
99          The Loewen Group Inc.                                      4
            Press Release dated November 5, 1998
</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 17, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00435

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.C., I.C., AND A.C.

,

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017PA01998

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The court reporter’s request for additional time to file the reporter’s record is granted. We

order the court reporter, Elva G. Chapa, to file the reporter’s record by Ju ly 20, 2018.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 17th day of July, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court