alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE 
SHEET OF NUTRACEUTIXM INC. AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND THE RELATED STATEMENT 
OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN 
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         165,924
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  734,799
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    896,691
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,970,698
<PP&E>                                       1,194,300
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,105,696
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,155,997
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,795
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,474,169
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,105,696
<SALES>                                      4,689,867
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,689,867
<CGS>                                        2,676,784
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,676,784
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,809,679
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               203,404
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (109,256)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 94,148
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             94,148
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    94,148
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .007
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .006
        

</TABLE>
#### § 26.8 Other transition activities.

As soon as possible, the authorities will jointly determine the essential information which must be present in inspection reports and will cooperate to develop mutually agreed inspection report format(s).
FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE 1992 STOCK OPTION PLAN
CONCEPTS DIRECT, INC.

The 1992 Stock Option Plan (the "Plan")  of Concepts Direct, Inc. (the
"Company") is hereby amended as follows:

1.  Definitions:  Terms, which are not specifically defined herein, shall 
    have the meanings given to them in the Plan.

2.  Stock:  Effective April 24, 1998, Article 4 of the Plan is hereby
    amended as follows:

   (a)  The first sentence is amended by replacing "70,000" with "380,000";
   and

   (b)  A new sentence is added at the end to read as follows:

        "No more than 50,000 shares may be allocated to the Incentive Awards
        that are granted to any individual Participant during any single
        fiscal year of the Company."

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this First Amendment to be
executed this 30th day of June, 1998.


Concepts Direct, Inc.

By:   /s/H. Franklin Marcus, Jr.
      H. Franklin Marcus, Jr.
      Title:  Chief Financial Officer
38447.

#### FLURY v. THE STATE.

Frankum, Judge.

Where, as in the instant case, a motion for a new trial was filed within the time provided by law and during the term of court in which the verdict was rendered and which motion included an order setting a hearing in time of vacation, the term is extended for the case until the date named. *McWane Cast Iron Pipe Co. v. Barrett,*72 Ga. App. 161 (33 S. E. 2d 528). A written order must be taken for a further extension of time for the hearing beyond that set in the original order *(Napier v. Heilker,*115 Ga. 168, 41 S. E. 689; *Atlanta K. & N. Ry. Co. v. Strickland,*114 Ga. 998, 41 S. E. 501; *Shepherd v. State,*79 Ga. App. 694, 54 S. E. 2d 503), or the motion goes over to the next regular term by operation of law. *Hardin v. Manry,*210 Ga. 747 (82 S. E. 2d 845); *Perry v. State,*12 Ga. App. 573 (77 S. E. 879). See *Code*§ *39470-302. The original order in the instant case set the hearing on the motion for a new trial for April 21, 1960, a day in vacation. At such date the trial judge entered an order continuing the hearing to May 5, 1960. Thereafter, the next regular term of the Laurens Superior Court, as fixed by statute, would have convened on the fourth Monday of July, 1960. No order appears in the record continuing the hearing from May 5, 1960, to May 19, 1960, at which time the trial judge denied the motion for a new trial without notice to and in the absence of the plaintiff in error or his counsel. There appears no application for a hearing by either party under the provisions of *Code*§§ 24-2618 and 24-2619. The trial judge being without jurisdiction to enter the order denying the motion for a new trial, the ruling must be reversed and set aside.

Decided September 16, 1960.

*J. A. Merritt,*for plaintiff in error.

*Harold E. Ward, Solicitor-General,*contra.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Gardner, P. J., Townsend and Carlisle, JJ., concur.*
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 38 (Friday, February 26, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9016-9017]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4027]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Fifth Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 221: Aircraft Secondary 
Barriers and Alternative Flight Deck Security Procedures

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special Committee 221 meeting: Aircraft 
Secondary Barriers and Alternative Flight Deck Security Procedures.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of RTCA Special Committee 221: Aircraft Secondary Barriers and 
Alternative Flight Deck Security Procedures.

DATES: The meeting will be held March 16-17, 2010. March 16th from 12 
a.m. to 5 p.m., March 17th from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., Colson Board Room, 
1828 L Street, NW., Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW., 
Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax (202) 
833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice 
is hereby given for a Special Committee 221: Aircraft Secondary 
Barriers and Alternative Flight Deck Security Procedures meeting. The 
agenda will include:
    <bullet> Welcome/Introductions/Administrative Remarks.
    <bullet> Approval of Summary of the Fourth Meeting held September 
15th-16th, 2009, RTCA Paper No. 012-10/SC221-015.
    <bullet> Leadership Comments.
    <bullet> Review of Threat Work Group--Status Report.
    <bullet> Review of Alternative Methods Work Group--Status Report.
    <bullet> Review of Installed Physical Secondary Barrier (IPSB) Work 
Group--Status Report.
    <bullet> Presentation/Discussion of SC-221 tentative conclusions, 
discussion of framework and content for final report.
    <bullet> Discussion of Working Group reports: Re-allocation of 
groups, capture learning points, discuss additional or follow-on goals.
    <bullet> Approval and Tasking of Existing/Proposed Working Groups.
    <bullet> Other Business--Including Proposed Agenda, Date and Place 
for Next Meeting.

[[Page 9017]]

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on February 22, 2010.
Francisco Estrada C.,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 2010-4027 Filed 2-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6112

JEROME ADDISON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

COUNTY OF CHARLESTON; DAVID BEASLEY, Governor; COORDINATOR, 

Commission of Prosecution; DONALD MYERS, Solicitor, 

Chairman; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; MICHAEL 

MOORE, Director; J. AL CANNON, JR.; CHARLESTON COUNTY 

SHERIFF; LORELLE PROCTOR, Public Defender,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Charleston. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. 

(2:09-cv-02896-HFF)

Submitted: March 30, 2010 Decided: April 6, 2010

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerome Addison, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jerome Addison seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order remanding his case to the magistrate judge for 

consideration of Addison’s motion to amend his complaint. This 

court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 

U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral 

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. 

Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order 

Addison seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an 

appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we 

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
###### Editorial Note on Part 201

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 201 appear at 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004.

#### § 201.58 Waiver of labeling requirements.

An applicant may ask the Food and Drug Administration to waive any requirement under §§ 201.56, 201.57, and 201.80. A waiver request must be submitted in writing to the Director (or the Director's designee), Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Central Document Room, 5901-B Ammendale Rd., Beltsville, MD 20705-1266, or, if applicable, the Director (or the Director's designee), Food and Drug Administration, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Document Control Center, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. G112, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002. The waiver must be granted or denied in writing by the Director or the Director's designee.

[71 FR 3996, Jan. 24, 2006, as amended at 74 FR 13112, Mar. 26, 2009; 80 FR 18090, Apr. 3, 2015]
§ 520.1189 Itraconazole. ( a ) *Specifications.* Each milliliter (mL) of solution contains 10 milligrams (mg) of itraconazole.
( b ) *Sponsor.* See No. 051311 in § 510.600(c) of this chapter.
( c ) *Conditions of use* — ( 1 ) *Amount.* Administer 5 mg/kilogram (kg) (0.5 mL/kg) of body weight once daily on alternating weeks for 3 treatment cycles.
( 2 ) *Indications for use.* For the treatment of dermatophytosis caused by *Microsporum canis* in cats.
( 3 ) *Limitations.* Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian.
[82 FR 12169, Mar. 1, 2017, as amended at 86 FR 57996, Oct. 20, 2021]
H. R. 7333 

One Hundred Eighteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-four 

An Act 

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs medical center in West Palm Beach, 

Florida, as the ‘‘Thomas H. Corey VA Medical Center’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL 

CENTER, WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA. 

The Department of Veterans Affairs medical center in West 

Palm Beach, Florida, shall after the date of the enactment of 

this Act be known and designated as the ‘‘Thomas H. Corey VA 

Medical Center’’. Any reference to such medical center in any law, 

regulation, map, document, record, or other paper of the United 

States shall be considered to be a reference to the Thomas H. 

Corey VA Medical Center. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 12-2424

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Frank Wilks

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

 Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis

____________

 Submitted: April 2, 2014 

Filed: May 9, 2014 

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, MELLOY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Frank Wilks appeals the sentence imposed on him after pleading guilty to being

a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). 

Counsel has moved to withdraw, filing a brief under Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel argues that the district court erred in determining that
Wilks’s 1993 Missouri escape-from-custody conviction was a violent felony for

section 924(e) purposes. Wilks also alleges that the court failed to explain how it

applied the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors in determining the sentence and did not give

adequate weight to Wilks’s physical and mental health problems.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is denied. The case is remanded for further

consideration in light of United States v. Tucker, 740 F.3d 1177 (8th Cir. 2014) (en

banc).

______________________________

-2-
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Please also file attached letter in Docket DOT-OST-2010-0224
U. S. Department of Homeland Security

 Office for Domestic Preparedness

 Washington, D.C. 20531

ODP Information Bulletin

No. 90 December 22, 2003

TO: All State Administrative Agency Heads

All State Administrative Agency Points of Contact

FROM: C. Suzanne Mencer

Director

SUBJECT: Availability of Financial Management Training Seminars

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Office for Domestic Preparedness (ODP) is

notifying grantees of the availability of financial management training seminars sponsored by the

National Criminal Justice Association (NCJA) in concert with the Office of Justice Programs

(OJP) Office of the Comptroller (OC). These regional seminars are designed specifically for

personnel responsible for the financial administration of formula and/or discretionary grants

administered by OJP bureaus and offices, including ODP.

Topics covered during the financial management training seminars include:

• Application review process

• Grantee financial reporting requirements

• Methods of payments

• Matching requirements

• Indirect costs

• Confidential funds

• Closeout process

• Monitoring responsibility

• Federal regulations and requirements governing the recording and expenditure of

program income, procurement, lobbying, compliance with drug-free workplace

requirements, supplanting, and audits

There is no registration fee for the two-day training seminar. However, attendees are responsible

for all costs associated with their participation in the seminar, including transportation, lodging,

and meals. Grantees can use management and administration funds from the following ODP

grant programs to pay for costs associated with attending this training:

• FY 2004 Homeland Security Grant Program

• FY 2004 Urban Areas Security Initiative

• FY 2003 State Homeland Security Grant Program I

• FY 2003 State Homeland Security Grant Program II

• FY 2003 Urban Areas Security Initiative Grant Program I
• FY 2003 Urban Areas Security Initiative Grant Program II

In 2003, thirteen seminars took place in Washington DC and at select regional locations

throughout the country, including, Charlotte, Detroit, Nashville, Philadelphia, Portland, San

Antonio, San Francisco, Seattle, St. Louis. NCJA will post the 2004 schedule on its website

(http://www.ncja.org/2003FMS.htm#) once dates have been decided upon by OC.

Questions about the training seminars can be directed to Elizabeth Hinton, NCJA Meeting

Planner, at (202) 628-8550.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7199 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7199

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 4, 2024

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at S74w16860 Janesville Road, in Muskego, Wisconsin, as the ``Colonel 
                   Hans Christian Heg Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COLONEL HANS CHRISTIAN HEG POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located S74w16860 Janesville Road in Muskego, Wisconsin, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Colonel Hans Christian Heg Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Colonel 
Hans Christian Heg Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 3, 2024.

            Attest:

                                             KEVIN F. MCCUMBER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
[No. 15565-0-III.

Division Three.

November 20, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Michael Ray O’Neil, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Spokane County, No. 95-1-00725-3, Harold D. Clarke, J., entered February 20, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Schultheis, A.C.J., concurred in by Kurtz and Brown, JJ.
## NO. 12

- 14

- 00028

- CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN RE:

PHIL CAULEY §
§
§ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM On July 23, 2014 , this c ourt delivered an opinion conditionally granting the p etition for writ of mandamus filed by Relator, Phil Cauley . That opinion directed Respondent to vacate his order signed on December 13
, 2013, granting the petition requesting Cauley’s presuit deposition, which was filed by Real Party in Interest, Efficien Technology, L.L.C. On August 7, 2014, Respondent complied with our July 23, 2014 opinion and order. All issues attendant to this original proceeding having been disposed of, this mandamus proceeding has now been rendered moot; therefore, the writ need n ot issue. Accordingly, this original proceeding is dismissed as moot. Opinion delivered August 20, 2014. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

( PUBLISH )

## COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH CO URT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

AUGUST 20 , 2014

NO. 12

- 14

- 00028

- CV

IN RE: PHIL CAULEY, Appellant V.

, Appellee

Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No 2 of Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 62,356

- A)

ON THIS DAY came to be heard the petition for writ of mandamus filed by PHIL CAULEY , who is the defendant in Cause No. 62,356

- A , pending on the docket of the County Court at Law #2
, Smith County, Texas. Said petition for writ of mandamus having been filed herein on January 23 201 4
, and the same having been duly considered, it is therefore CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the said petition for writ of mandamus be, and the same is, hereby D ISMISSED AS M OOT .

By per curiam opinion

. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle , J

.
§ 835.1101 Control of material and equipment. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, material and equipment in contamination areas, high contamination areas, and airborne radioactivity areas shall not be released to a controlled area if: ( 1 ) Removable surface contamination levels on accessible surfaces exceed the removable surface contamination values specified in appendix D of this part; or
( 2 ) Prior use suggests that the removable surface contamination levels on inaccessible surfaces are likely to exceed the removable surface contamination values specified in appendix D of this part.
( b ) Material and equipment exceeding the removable surface contamination values specified in appendix D of this part may be conditionally released for movement on-site from one radiological area for immediate placement in another radiological area only if appropriate monitoring is performed and appropriate controls for the movement are established and exercised.
( c ) Material and equipment with fixed contamination levels that exceed the total contamination values specified in appendix D of this part may be released for use in controlled areas outside of radiological areas only under the following conditions: ( 1 ) Removable surface contamination levels are below the removable surface contamination values specified in appendix D of this part; and
( 2 ) The material or equipment is routinely monitored and clearly marked or labeled to alert personnel of the contaminated status.
§ 344.1 Scope. ( a ) An over-the-counter topical otic drug product in a form suitable for topical administration is generally recognized as safe and effective and is not misbranded if it meets each of the conditions in this part in addition to each of the general conditions established in § 330.1.
( b ) References in this part to regulatory sections of the Code of Federal Regulations are to chapter I of title 21 unless otherwise noted.