# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 14-1059V Filed: February 3, 2016

UNPUBLISHED

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * VALERIE C. DOBBINS, *

* Petitioner, * Joint Stipulation on Damages; * Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccination; * Guillain-Barre Syndrome (“GBS”); SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Special Processing Unit (“SPU”) AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

* Respondent. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Nancy Routh Meyers, Ward Black Law , Greensboro, NC, for petitioner. Althea Walker Davis, U.S. Department of Justice, Washingt on, DC, for respondent.

DECISION ON J OINT STIPULATION 1

Dorsey , Chief Special Master:

On October 30, 2014, petit ioner filed a petition fo r compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensat ion Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.

, 2 [the “Vaccine Act”]. Petitioner alleges that s he suffered Guillain Barre Syndrome as the result on her influenza (“flu”) vaccinati on on October 30, 2013. Petition, ¶ 15; Stipulation, filed February 1, 2016, ¶¶ 2, 4. Petitioner furt her alleges that she suffered the residual effects of her injury for more than six months, and that she has received no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages as a result of her injury. Petition, ¶¶ 18, 20; Stipulation, ¶¶ 4- 5. “Respondent denies that the flu vaccine caused petitioner’s Guillain-Barre Syndrome or any other injury or her current condition.” Stipulation, ¶ 6.

Nevertheless, on February 1, 2016, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation, stating that a decision should be entered awarding compens ation. The undersigned

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 no te (2012)(Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other inform ation, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, t he undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).2 finds the stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

The parties stipulated that petitioner s hall receive the following compensation:

A lump sum of $175,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner

. Stipulation, ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages

that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Id

.

The undersigned approves the requested amount for petitioner’s compensation.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Append ix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgm ent in accordance with this decision. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment c an be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.Case 1:14-vv-01059-UNJ Document 27 Filed 02/01/16 Page 1 of 5Case 1:14-vv-01059-UNJ Document 27 Filed 02/01/16 Page 2 of 5Case 1:14-vv-01059-UNJ Document 27 Filed 02/01/16 Page 3 of 5Case 1:14-vv-01059-UNJ Document 27 Filed 02/01/16 Page 4 of 5Case 1:14-vv-01059-UNJ Document 27 Filed 02/01/16 Page 5 of 5