384 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 2 / Tuesday, January 4, 2011 / Notices 

produced in the United States or are 

otherwise available in the United States, 

with respect to the articles potentially 

subject to the orders; and 

(iv) Indicate whether Complainant, 

Complainant’s licensees, and/or third 

party suppliers have the capacity to 

replace the volume of articles 

potentially subject to an exclusion order 

and a cease and desist order within a 

commercially reasonable time. 

Written submissions must be filed no 

later than by close of business, five 

business days after the date of 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register. There will be further 

opportunities for comment on the 

public interest after the issuance of any 

final initial determination in this 

investigation. 

Persons filing written submissions 

must file the original document and 12 

true copies thereof on or before the 

deadlines stated above with the Office 

of the Secretary. Submissions should 

refer to the docket number (‘‘Docket No. 

2777’’) in a prominent place on the 

cover page and/or the first page. The 

Commission’s rules authorize filing 

submissions with the Secretary by 

facsimile or electronic means only to the 

extent permitted by section 201.8 of the 

rules (see Handbook for Electronic 

Filing Procedures, http://www.usitc.gov/ 

secretary/fed_reg_notices/rules/ 

documents/ 

handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf). 

Persons with questions regarding 

electronic filing should contact the 

Secretary (202–205–2000). 

Any person desiring to submit a 

document to the Commission in 

confidence must request confidential 

treatment. All such requests should be 

directed to the Secretary to the 

Commission and must include a full 

statement of the reasons why the 

Commission should grant such 

treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents 

for which confidential treatment by the 

Commission is properly sought will be 

treated accordingly. All nonconfidential 

written submissions will be available for 

public inspection at the Office of the 

Secretary. 

This action is taken under the 

authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), 

and of sections 201.10 and 210.50(a)(4) 

of the Commission’s Rules of Practice 

and Procedure (19 CFR 201.10, 

210.50(a)(4)). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: December 28, 2010. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–33131 Filed 1–3–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Inv. No. 337–TA–753] 

Certain Semiconductor Chips and 

Products Containing Same; Notice of 

Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Institution of investigation 

pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

complaint was filed with the U.S. 

International Trade Commission on 

December 1, 2010, under section 337 of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 

U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Rambus Inc. of 

Sunnyvale, California. The complaint 

alleges violations of section 337 based 

upon the importation into the United 

States, the sale for importation, and the 

sale within the United States after 

importation of certain semiconductor 

chips and products containing same by 

reason of infringement of certain claims 

of U.S. Patent No. 6,470,405 (‘‘the ‘405 

patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 6,591,353 (‘‘the 

‘353 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,287,109 

(‘‘the ‘109 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 

7,602,857 (‘‘the ‘857 patent’’); U.S. 

Patent No. 7,602,858 (‘‘the ‘858 patent’’); 

U.S. Patent No. 7,715,494 (‘‘the ‘494 

patent’’). The complaint further alleges 

that an industry in the United States 

exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of 

section 337. 

The complainant requests that the 

Commission institute an investigation 

and, after the investigation, issue an 

exclusion order and cease and desist 

orders. 

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for 

any confidential information contained 

therein, is available for inspection 

during official business hours (8:45 a.m. 

to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the 

Secretary, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 

112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 

202–205–2000. Hearing impaired 

individuals are advised that information 

on this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on 202–205–1810. Persons 

with mobility impairments who will 

need special assistance in gaining access 

to the Commission should contact the 

Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its Internet server at http:// 

www.usitc.gov. The public record for 

this investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Daniel L. Girdwood, Esq., Office of 

Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 

telephone (202) 205–3409. 

Authority: The authority for institution of 

this investigation is contained in section 337 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 

in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules 

of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 

(2010). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

December 28, 2010, Ordered That— 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine whether there is a 

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of certain semiconductor 

chips and products containing same that 

infringe one or more of claims 11–13, 

15, and 18 of the ‘405 patent; claims 11– 

13 of the ‘353 patent; claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 

12, 13, 20, 21, and 24 of the ‘109 patent; 

claims 1, 2, 4–6, 9–13, 24–28, 31–36, 

39–44, 47, and 49–53 of the ‘857 patent; 

claims 1, 2, 4, 7, and 20 of the ‘858 

patent; and claims 1–3, 6, 8, 25, 26, 30, 

39, 40, and 42 of the ‘494 patent, and 

whether an industry in the United 

States exists as required by subsection 

(a)(2) of section 337; 

(2) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainant is: 

Rambus Inc., 1050 Enterprise Way, 

Suite 700, Sunnyvale, CA 94089. 

(b) The respondents are the following 

entities alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and are the parties upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., 6501 

William Cannon Drive West, Austin, 

TX 78735. 

Broadcom Corporation, 5300 California 

Avenue, Irvine, CA 92617. 

LSI Corporation, 1621 Barber Lane, 

Milpitas, CA 95035. 

MediaTek Inc., No. 1, Dusing Road 1, 

Hsinchu Science Park, Hsin-Chu, 

Taiwan 30078. 

nVidia Corporation, 2701 San Tomas 

Expressway, Santa Clara, CA 95050. 

STMicroelectronics N.V., 39, Chemin du 

Champ des Filles, C. P. 21CH 1228 

Plan-Les-Ouates, Geneva, 

Switzerland. 

STMicroelectronics Inc., 1310 

Electronics Dr., Carrollton, TX 75006. 

Asustek Computer Inc., 15, Li The Road, 

Taipei City 11259, Taiwan. 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 2 / Tuesday, January 4, 2011 / Notices 385 

Asus Computer International Inc., 800 

Corporate Way, Fremont, CA 94539. 

Audio Partnership Plc., Gallery Court, 

Hankey Place, London SE1 4BB, 

United Kingdom. 

Biostar Microtech (U.S.A.) Corp., 18551 

East Gale Avenue, City of Industry, 

CA 91748. 

Biostar Microtech International Corp., 

2 Fl., 108–2, Ming Chuan Road, Hsin 

Tien, Taiwan. 

Cisco Systems, Inc., 170 West Tasman 

Drive, San Jose, CA 95134–1706. 

Elitegroup Computer Systems, No. 239, 

Sec. 2, Ti Ding Blvd., Taipei, Taiwan 

11493. 

EVGA Corporation, 2900 Saturn Street, 

Suite B, Brea, CA 92821. 

Galaxy Microsystems Ltd., Room 1101– 

1103, 11/F, Enterprise Square Two, 3 

Sheung Yuet Road, Kowloon Bay, 

KLN., Hong Kong. 

Garmin International, 1200 E. 151st 

Street, Olathe, KS 66062–3426. 

G.B.T. Inc., 17358 Railroad St., City of 

Industry, CA 91748. 

Giga-Byte Technology Co., Ltd., No. 6, 

Bau Chiang Road, Hsin-Tien, Taipei 

231, Taiwan. 

Gracom Technologies LLC, 1214 John 

Reed Ct., City of Industry, CA 91745. 

Hewlett-Packard Company, 3000 

Hanover St., Palo Alto, CA 94304. 

Hitachi Global Storage Technologies, 

3403 Yerba Buena Road, San Jose, CA 

95135. 

Jaton Corporation, 47677 Lakeview 

Blvd., Fremont, CA 94538. 

Jaton Technology TPE, 10F, No. 194, 

Sec. 3, Ta-Tung Road, Hsi-Chih, 

Taiwan. 

Micro-Star International Co., Ltd., No. 

69, Li-De St., Jung-He City, Taipei 

Hsien, Taiwan. 

MSI Computer Corporation, 901 Canada 

Court, City of Industry, California 

91748. 

Motorola, Inc., 1303 East Algonquin 

Road, Schaumburg, IL 60196. 

Oppo Digital, Inc., 2629 Terminal Blvd., 

Suite B, Mountain View, CA 94043. 

Palit Microsystems Ltd., 21F, 88, Sec. 2, 

Chung Hsiao E. Rd., Taipei, Taiwan. 

Pine Technology Holdings, Ltd., Unit A, 

32/F Manulife Tower, 169 Electric 

Road, North Point, Hong Kong. 

Seagate Technology, 920 Disc Drive, 

Scotts Valley, CA 95066. 

Sparkle Computer Co., Ltd., 5F.–7, No. 

79, Sec. 1, Xintai 5th Rd., Xizhi City, 

Taipei County 221, Taiwan. 

Zotac International (MCO) Ltd., 19/F., 

Shatin Galleria, 18–24 Shan Mei 

Street, Fo Tan, Shatin, N.T. Hong 

Kong. 

Zotac USA Inc., 17921 Rowland Street, 

City of Industry, CA 91748. 

(c) The Commission investigative 

attorney, party to this investigation, is 

Daniel L. Girdwood, Esq., Office of 

Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 

20436; and 

(3) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Honorable Paul J. Luckern, Chief 

Administrative Law Judge, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, shall 

designate the presiding Administrative 

Law Judge. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondents in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(d)–(e) and 210.13(a), 

such responses will be considered by 

the Commission if received not later 

than 20 days after the date of service by 

the Commission of the complaint and 

the notice of investigation. Extensions of 

time for submitting responses to the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation will not be granted unless 

good cause therefore is shown. 

Failure of a respondent to file a timely 

response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: December 29, 2010. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–33207 Filed 1–3–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree 

Under the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, 

Compensation and Liability Act 

In accordance with Departmental 

Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby 

given that a proposed Consent Decree in 

United States of America v. The Boeing 

Company et al., Civil Action No. 10– 

457–LRS (E.D. Wa.), was lodged with 

the United States District Court for the 

Western District of Washington on 

December 23, 2010. The proposed 

Consent Decree settles claims for, inter 

alia, response costs to address 

hazardous substances released at the 

Moses Lake Wellfield Superfund Site 

(Site). 

The complaint asserts claims against 

the defendants—The Boeing Company, 

Lockheed Martin Corporation, and the 

City of Moses Lake—for response costs 

incurred at the Site by the United States 

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

and the United States Army Corps of 

Engineers (Corps) pursuant to the 

section 107(a) of the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, 

Compensation, and Liability Act 

(CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. 9607(a). The 

complaint also seeks a declaratory 

judgment of liability against the 

defendants for future response costs 

incurred by EPA and the Corps at the 

Site. The State of Washington also filed 

a complaint on December 23, 2010, 

asserting claims for response costs 

against the defendants as well as against 

the United States. 

Under the proposed Consent Decree, 

the defendants will make payments to 

the United States totaling $3.25 million 

to resolve their CERCLA liability at the 

Site. The United States, on behalf of a 

group of settling Federal agencies 

including the United States Air Force, 

will make payments to EPA for the 

future response costs that are not 

covered by the defendants’ payments. 

The United States will also pay, on 

behalf of the settling Federal agencies, 

future response costs incurred by the 

State of Washington. Based on cleanup 

cost estimates, the United States’ 

payments on behalf of the settling 

Federal agencies, which will be largely 

to EPA, are expected to be 

approximately $55 million. The 

payments by the United States resolve 

claims against it by the State of 

Washington as well as claims by the 

defendants. In addition, the United 

States, on behalf of the settling Federal 

agencies, will pay the City of Moses 

Lake approximately $2.96 million to 

resolve claims for response costs and 

attorney fees asserted by the City of 

Moses Lake in its related pending 

lawsuit, No. 04–0376. 

The Department of Justice will receive 

written comments relating to the 

proposed Consent Decree for a period of 

thirty (30) days from the date of 

publication of this notice. Comments 

should be addressed to the Assistant 

Attorney General, Environment and 

Natural Resources Division, and either 

e-mailed to pubcommentees.enrd@usdoj.gov or mailed to P.O. 

Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, 

Washington, DC 20044–7611, and 

should refer to United States of America 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES