SIP SUBMITTAL COMPLETENESS CRITERIA CHECKLIST (In accordance with 40 CFR Part 51

- App. V) SIP Submitted by: Virginia Department ofEnvironmental Quality (VADEQ) Date Submitted: July 23, 2012 Subject: 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) Infrastructure State Implementation Plan (SIP) Completeness Review Completedby: Ruth Knapp Date Completed: December 5, 2012 Administrative Materials ACCEPTABLE 

# I EPA REQUIREMENT 

# I STATE SUBMITTAL 

# I(X) 

# I
1. A formal letter ofsubmittal from the Governor or his 1. Yes, the July 23, 2012letter was signedby David Paylor 

### p designee, requesting EPA approval ofthe plan orrevision the Director ofVADEQ as the approved designee for SIP thereof. submittals. 2. Evidence that the State has adopted the plan in the State code 2. Yes, applicable sections of 110(a)(2) are adopted into the 

### p or body ofregulations; or issued the permit, order, consent Virginia Air Pollution Control Law and/or Virginia's SIP in figreement in final form. That evidence shall include the date 40CFRPart 52 ofadoption or final issuance as well as the effective date ofthe

1plan, ifdifferent from the adoption/issuance date. 3. Evidence that the State has the necessary legal authority 3. Yes, Virginia has the authority under Section 10.1-1185 of 

### P" under State law to adopt and implement the plan. the Air pollution control law.
4. A copy ofactual regulation, or document submitted for 4. Yes, all state regulations have been previously adopted and 

### P' approval and incorporation by reference into the plan, including arejustbeing certified as applicable inthe July 23, 2012

. indication ofthe changes made to the existing approved plan, submittal. where applicable. The submittal shall be a copy ofthe official Stateregulation/document signed, stamped, dated by the appropriate State official indicating that it is fully enforceable by the State. The effective date ofthe regulation/document shall, wheneverpossible, be indicated in the document itself. I- EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL (X) 5. Evidence that the State followed all ofthe procedural 5. Yes, the submittal certifying that Virginia meets all the 

### P' equirements ofthe State's laws and constitution in conducting applicable requirements of 110(a)(2) for Ozone was signed and and completing the adoption/issuance ofthe plan. submitted following the procedural requirements ofthe Commonwealth. 6. Evidence that public notice was given ofthe proposed 6. Yes, the notice ofpublic commentperiod was published in 

# w change consistent with procedures approved byEPA, including the Virginia Register ofRegulations on June 4, 2012. The he date ofpublication ofsuch notice. notice announced thatthe commentperiod was from June 4, 2012 through July 5, 2012. 7. Certificationthat public hearings were held in accordance 7. Yes, inthe notice ofpublic comment the option was given 

# w with the information provided inthe public notice and the for a hearing to be held, and no suchrequest was received. State's laws and constitution, ifapplicable. 8. Compilation ofpublic comments and the State's response 8. Yes, public comments were received and the p thereto. Commonwealthresponded as required.

Technical S EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL (X) 1. Identification ofall regulated pollutants affected by the plan. 1. Yes, the plan regulates VOCs and NOx as precursors of 

### pOzone. 2. Identification ofthe locations ofaffected sources including 2. Yes, all areas ofVirginia, with the exception ofNorthem 

### P' the EPA attainment/nonattainment designation ofthe locations Virginia, were designated as attaining the standard. Northern andthe status ofthe attainment plan for the affected area(s). Virginia, as part ofthe metropolitan Washington, DC area, was designated nonattainment, with a classification ofmarginal.
3. Quantification ofthe changes inplan allowable emissions 3. No changes in the emissions will occur from the from the affected sources; estimates ofchanges in current certification ofthe current regulations approved in Virginia's**~ctual** emissions from affected sources or, where appropriate, SIP as a result ofthis revision. 

### f7 quantification ofchanges in actual emissions from affected sources through calculations ofthe differences between certain

1baseline levels and allowable emissions anticipated as a result IIEPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL (X) ofthe revision.**~.The** State's demonstrationthat the national ambient air 4. Yes, Virginia's major stationary sources are currently 

# w quality standards, prevention ofsignificant deterioration subject to nonattainmentNSR and PSD permitting programs. increments, reasonable further progress demonstration, and visibility, as applicable, are protected ifthe plan is approved and implemented. 5. Modeling information required to support the proposed 5. The authority to do modeling is certified in this revision, but specific modeling is notrequired for this revision

. revision, including input data, output data, models used, fUI1bient monitoring dataused, meteorological data used, 

### P"

'ustification for use ofoffsite data (where used), modes of

1models used, assumptions, and other information relevant to the determination ofadequacy ofthe modeling analysis. 6. Evidence, where necessary, that emission limitations are 6. Yes, Virginia has adopted control measures and emissions 

### p based on continuous emission reduction technology. limitations that will continuously reduce emissions and are listed in 40 CFR 52.2420(e)

.


# . 7. Evidence that the plan contains emission limitations, work 7: Yes, Virginia maintains and reports ambient air quality data 

### p practice standards and recordkeeping/reporting requirements; using approved EPA methods to EPA's Air Quality System as where necessary, to ensure emission levels. prescribed in 40 CFRpart 58. Virginia also requires stationary sources to monitor and report emissions as prescribed in 9V AC5 chapters 20, 40, and 50 under 40 CFR 52.2420 8. Compliance/enforcement strategies, including how 8. Yes, Virginia's enforcement emissions limitations and other 

### p**~ompliance** will be determined in practice. control measures are those provisions listed in Virginia's SIP in 40 CFR 52.2420(c) 9. Special economic and technologicaljustifications required 9. N/A 

### p by any applicable EPA policies. (Ifa policy is not appropriate, !explain why.) 10. A Section 107 request mustbe accompanied by a 10. N/A 

### p maintenance plan demonstrating maintenance to the relevant NAAQS for at least 10 years after redesignation.

--- · -