alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 1 (Monday, January 3, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 179]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-33049]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

TA-W-71,374

GMPT Warren Transmission, GM Powertrain Division, a Subsidiary of 
General Motors Company Including On-Site Leased Workers From Knight 
Facilities Management, Warren, MI; Amended Certification Regarding 
Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(``Act''), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a 
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance 
on April 14, 2010, applicable to workers of GMPT Warren Transmission, 
GM Powertrain Division, a subsidiary of General Motors Company, Warren, 
Michigan. The Department's notice was published in the Federal Register 
on May 20, 2010 (75 FR 28300). Workers are engaged in the production of 
automotive transmissions.
    At the request of the United Automobile, Aerospace & Agriculture 
Implement Workers of America (UAW), Local 909, the Department reviewed 
the certification.
    The company reports that workers leased from Knight Facilities 
Management were employed on-site at the Warren, Michigan location of 
the subject firm. The Department has determined that these workers were 
sufficiently under the control of GMPT Warren Transmission, GM 
Powertrain Division, a subsidiary of General Motors Company, to be 
considered leased workers.
    Based on these findings, the Department is amending this 
certification to include workers leased from Knight Facilities 
Management working on-site at the Warren, Michigan location of GMPT 
Warren Transmission, GM Powertrain Division, a subsidiary of General 
Motors Company.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-71,374 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of GMPT Warren Transmission, GM Powertrain Division, 
a subsidiary of General Motors Company, including on-site leased 
workers from Knight Facilities Management, Warren, Michigan, who 
became totally or partially separated from employment on or after 
June 16, 2008, through April 14, 2012, and all workers in the group 
threatened with total or partial separation from employment on the 
date of certification through two years from the date of 
certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under 
Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 14th day of December 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-33049 Filed 12-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
```
§ 182.2906 Tricalcium silicate. ( a ) *Product.* Tricalcium silicate.
( b ) *Tolerance.* 2 percent.
( c ) *Limitations, restrictions, or explanation.* This substance is generally recognized as safe when used in table salt in accordance with good manufacturing practice.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 8, 2017

No. 04

- 16

- 00783

- CR

IN RE Adam GONZALES

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Reb eca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Relator filed this petition for writ of mandamus on December 2, 2016, complaining that

the trial court had not ruled on his motions for post

- conviction DNA testing and for appointment

of counsel in connection with his request for DNA testing. On January 24, 2017 , Respondent

filed a cop y of an order denying the motions. Because the trial court has ruled on the motions,

Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus has been r endered moot. Accordingly, this original

mandamus proceeding is DISMISSED AS MOOT

.

It is so ORDERED on February 8, 2017

.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 8th day of February, 2017

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

, Clerk

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. A02

- 136, styled State v. Adam Gonzales , in the 216th Judicial District

Court, Kerr County, Texas, the Honorable N. Keith Williams presiding.
Editorial Note on Part 173
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 173 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; and 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 173.345 Chloropentafluoroethane. The food additive chloropentafluoroethane may be safely used in food in accordance with the following prescribed conditions: ( a ) The food additive has a purity of not less than 99.97 percent, and contains not more than 200 parts per million saturated fluoro compounds and 10 parts per million unsaturated fluoro compounds as impurities.
( b ) The additive is used or intended for use alone or with one or more of the following substances: Carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, propane, and octafluorocyclobutane complying with § 173.360, as an aerating agent for foamed or sprayed food products, with any propellant effect being incidental and no more than is minimally necessary to achieve the aerating function, except that use is not permitted for those standardized foods that do not provide for such use.
( c ) To assure safe use of the additive ( 1 ) The label of the food additive container shall bear, in addition to the other information required by the act, the following: ( i ) The name of the additive, chloropentafluoroethane.
( ii ) The percentage of the additive present in the case of a mixture.
( iii ) The designation “food grade”.
( 2 ) The label or labeling of the food additive container shall bear adequate directions for use.
[42 FR 14526, Mar. 15, 1977, as amended at 43 FR 11317, Mar. 17, 1978; 43 FR 14644, Apr. 7, 1978]
[No. 15054-2-III.

Division Three.

December 16, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Terry Lee Hartzog, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Benton County, No. 95-1-00144-4, Craig Matheson, J., entered July 19, 1995. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Sweeney, C.J., concurred in by Brown, J., and Thompson, J. Pro Tern.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of National Medical Health Card Systems,Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/Afor the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stuart Diamond, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to myknowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations ofthe Company.
| /s/  STUART DIAMOND                               |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Stuart Diamond                                         |
| Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial  Officer) |
| September 15, 2006                                     |

 

----
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7109 

AN ACT 

To require a citizenship question on the decennial census, 

to require reporting on certain census statistics, and 

to modify apportionment of Representatives to be based 

on United States citizens instead of all individuals. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 7109 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Equal Representation 

3 Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. CITIZENSHIP STATUS ON DECENNIAL CENSUS. 

5 Section 141 of title 13, United States Code, is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) by redesignating subsection (g) as sub8 section (h); and 

9 (2) by inserting after subsection (f) the fol10 lowing: 

11 ‘‘(g)(1) In conducting the 2030 decennial census and 

12 each decennial census thereafter, the Secretary shall in13 clude in any questionnaire distributed or otherwise used 

14 for the purpose of determining the total population by 

15 States a checkbox or other similar option for the respond16 ent to indicate, for the respondent and for each of the 

17 members of the household of the respondent, whether that 

18 individual is a citizen of the United States. 

19 ‘‘(2) Not later than 120 days after completion of a 

20 decennial census of the population under subsection (a), 

21 the Secretary shall make publicly available the number of 

22 individuals per State, disaggregated by citizens of the 

23 United States and noncitizens, as tabulated in accordance 

24 with this section.’’. 
3 

•HR 7109 EH

1 SEC. 3. EXCLUSION OF NONCITIZENS FROM NUMBER OF 

2 PERSONS USED TO DETERMINE APPORTION3 MENT OF REPRESENTATIVES AND NUMBER 

4 OF ELECTORAL VOTES. 

5 (a) EXCLUSION.—Section 22(a) of the Act entitled 

6 ‘‘An Act to provide for the fifteenth and subsequent decen7 nial censuses and to provide for apportionment of Rep8 resentatives in Congress’’, approved June 18, 1929 (2 

9 U.S.C. 2a(a)), is amended by inserting after ‘‘not taxed’’ 

10 the following: ‘‘and individuals who are not citizens of the 

11 United States’’. 

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

13 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to the apportion14 ment of Representatives carried out pursuant to the de15 cennial census conducted during 2030 and any succeeding 

16 decennial census. 

17 SEC. 4. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. 

18 If any provision of this Act or amendment made by 

19 this Act, or the application thereof to any person or cir20 cumstance, is held to be unconstitutional, the remainder 

21 of the provisions of this Act and amendments made by 

22 this Act, and the application of the provision or amend-
4 

•HR 7109 EH

1 ment to any other person or circumstance, shall not be 

2 affected. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 8, 2024. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7109 

AN ACT 

To require a citizenship question on the decennial 

instead of all individuals. resentatives to be based on United States citizens statistics, and to modify apportionment of Repcensus, to require reporting on certain census
###### Editorial Note on Part 184

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 184 appear at 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; and 81 FR 49897, July 29, 2016.

#### § 184.1097 Tannic acid.

(a) Tannic acid (CAS Reg. No. 1401-55-4), or hydrolyzable gallotannin, is a complex polyphenolic organic structure that yields gallic acid and either glucose or quinic acid as hydrolysis products. It is a yellowish-white to light brown substance in the form of an amorphous, bulky powder, glistening scales, or spongy masses. It is also ordorless, or has a faint characteristic odor, and has an astringent taste. Tannic acid is obtained by solvent extraction of nutgalls or excrescences that form on the young twigs of *Quercus infectoria Oliver* and related species of *Quercus.* Tannic acid is also obtained by solvent extraction of the seed pods of Tara (*Caesalpinia spinosa*) or the nutgalls of various sumac species, including *Rhus semialata, R. coriaria, R. galabra,* and *R. typhia.*

(b) The ingredient meets the specifications of the Food Chemicals Codex, 3d Ed. (1981), p. 319, which is incorporated by reference. Copies are available from the National Academy Press, 2101 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20418, or available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.*

(c)

(1) In accordance with § 184.1(b)(2), the ingredient is used in food only within the following specific limitations:

| Category of food | Maximum level of use in food (as served) (percent) | Functional use |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Baked goods and baking mixes, § 170.3(n)(1) of this chapter | 0.01 | Flavoring agent and adjuvant, § 170.3(o)(12) of this chapter. |
| Alcoholic beverages, § 170.3(n)(2) of this chapter | 0.015 | Flavor enhancer, § 170.3(o)(11) of this chapter; flavoring agent and adjuvant, § 170.3(o)(12) of this chapter; processing aid, § 170.3(o)(24) of this chapter. |
| Nonalcoholic beverages and beverage bases, § 170.3(n)(3) of this chapter and for gelatins, puddings, and fillings, § 170.3(n)(22) of this chapter | 0.005 | Flavoring agent and adjuvant, § 170.3(o)(12) of this chapter; pH control agent, § 170.3(o)(23) of this chapter. |
| Frozen dairy desserts and mixes, § 170.3(n)(20) of this chapter and for soft candy, § 170.3(n)(38) of this chapter | 0.04 | Flavoring agent and adjuvant, § 170.3(o)(12) of this chapter. |
| Hard candy and cough drops, § 170.3(n)(25) of this chapter | 0.013 | Do. |
| Meat products, § 170.3(n)(29) of this chapter | 0.001 | Do. |

(2) Tannic acid may be used in rendered animal fat in accordance with 9 CFR 424.21.

(d) Prior sanctions for this ingredient different from the uses established in this section do not exist or have been waived.

[50 FR 21043, May 22, 1985, as amended at 85 FR 72907, Nov. 16, 2020
# EUR-Lex - 31994D0001 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31994D0001

**94/1/EC, ECSC: Decision of the Council and the Commission of 13 December 1993 on the conclusion of the Agreement on the European Economic Area between the European Communities, their Member States and the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Finland, the Republic of Iceland, the Principality of Liechtenstein, the Kingdom of Norway, the Kingdom of Sweden and the Swiss Confederation **

*
Official Journal L 001 , 03/01/1994 P. 0001 - 0001 Finnish special edition: Chapter 2 Volume 11 P. 0037 Swedish special edition: Chapter 2 Volume 11 P. 0037 *

DECISION OF THE COUNCIL AND THE COMMISSION

of 13 December 1993

on the conclusion of the Agreement on the European Economic Area between the European Communities, their Member States and the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Finland, the Republic of Iceland, the Principality of Liechtenstein, the Kingdom of Norway, the Kingdom of Sweden and the Swiss Confederation

(94/1/ECSC, EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Coal and Steel Community,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 238 in conjunction with Article 228 (3), second subparagraph thereof,

Having regard to the assent of the European Parliament (1),

Whereas the Agreement on the European Economic Area between the European Communities, their Member States and the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Finland, the Republic of Iceland, the Principality of Liechtenstein, the Kingdom of Norway, the Kingdom of Sweden and the Swiss Confederation, signed in Oporto on 2 May 1992 should be approved,

HAVE DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The Agreement on the European Economic Area between the European Communities, their Member States and the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Finland, the Republic of Iceland, the Principality of Liechtenstein, the Kingdom of Norway, the Kingdom of Sweden and the Swiss Confederation, the Protocols, the Annexes annexed thereto and the Declarations, the Agreed Minutes and exchanges of letters attached to the Final Act are hereby approved on behalf of the European Community and the European Coal and Steel Community.

The texts of the acts referred to in the first paragraph are attached to this Decision.

Article 2

The act of approval provided for in Article 129 of the Agreement shall be deposited by the President of the Council on behalf of the European Community and by the President of the Commission on behalf of the European Coal and Steel Community (2).

Done at Brussels, 13 December 1993.

For the Council

The President

Ph. MAYSTADT

For the Commission

The President

J. DELORS

(1) OJ No C 305, 23. 11. 1992, p. 66.

(2) See page 606 of this Official Journal.
#### § 415.15 Waivers.

In an emergency, the Secretary may waive any provision in Subpart C—Intergovernmental Review of Department of Agriculture Programs and Activities, 2 CFR 415.3 to 415.14.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

ORDER AMENDING RULE

126 OF THE PENNSYLVANIA 

RULES OF APPELLATE 

PROCEDURE

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

NO. 278

APPELLATE PROCEDURAL RULES

DOCKET 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 4

th day of March, 2019, upon the recommendation of the 

Appellate Court Procedural Rules Committee; the proposal having been published for 

public comment at 47 Pa.B. 7 (January 7, 2017):

It is Ordered pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania 

that Rule 126 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedure is amended in the 

attached form.

This Order shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(b), and shall 

be effective May 1, 2019.

Additions to the rule are shown in bold and are underlined.

Deletions from the rule are shown in bold and brackets.
§ 1314.42 Self-certification fee; time and method of fee payment. ( a ) A regulated seller must pay a fee for each self-certification. For each initial application to self-certify, and for the renewal of each existing self-certification, a regulated seller shall pay a fee of $21.
( b ) The fee for self-certification shall be waived for any person holding a current, DEA registration in good standing as a pharmacy to dispense controlled substances.
( c ) A regulated seller shall pay the fee at the time of self-certification.
( d ) Payment shall be made by credit card.
( e ) The self-certification fee is not refundable.
[73 FR 79323, Dec. 29, 2008]
EXHIBIT23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTINGFIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements (Form S-8 No. 33-99740, Form S-8 No. 33-40365and Form S-8 No. 333-9162) pertaining to the Power Control TechnologiesInc. 1995 Stock Option Plan, the M & F Worldwide 1997 Stock OptionPlan, and the M & F Worldwide Corp. 2000 Stock Option Plan of M& F Worldwide Corp. of our reports dated March 14, 2006, withrespect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of M& F Worldwide Corp., M & F Worldwide Corp. management'sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting of M & F Worldwide Corp., included in this Annual Report(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005.

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

March 14,2006 New York, New York

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 BALANCE SHEET AND THE STATEMENT OF INCOME AND RETAINED
EARNINGS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
10-Q.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         129,558
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,596,700<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,726,258
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              82,226,258<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,726,700
<COMMON>                                         2,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  79,497,558<F3>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                82,226,258
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,398,807<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   39,363
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,359,444
<INCOME-TAX>                                    32,762
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,326,682
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,326,682
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.10
<FN>
<F1>Receivables are due from affiliated companies.
<F2>Investment in preferred shares of Chieftain International (U.S.) Inc., at
cost, is $78,500,000.
<F3>Additional paid-in capital of $14,998,000 (attributable to common stock) and
$60,676,203 (attributable to preferred stock) has been included in other
stockholders' equity.
<F4>Revenues are earned exclusively from transactions with parent company.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### Pacita CABRERA CO, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-71259.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 11, 2005.*

Decided Oct. 18, 2005.

Rodel E. Rodis, Esq., Law Offices of Rodel E. Rodis, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Western Region Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: T.G. NELSON, WARDLAW, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Pacita Cabrera Co, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) summary affirmance of an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of her applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence and may reverse only if the evidence compels a contrary conclusion. *Rostomian v. INS,*210 F.3d 1088, 1089 (9th Cir.2000). We deny the petition.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s decision that petitioner failed to establish past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution on account of an enumerated ground. *See INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 483-84, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). Because petitioner failed to demonstrate that she was eligible for asylum, it follows that she did not satisfy the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. *See Singh-Kaur v. INS,*183 F.3d 1147, 1149 (9th Cir.1999).

Petitioner also fails to establish a CAT claim because she did not show that it was more likely than not that she would be tortured if she was returned to the Philippines. *See Kamalthas v. INS,*251 F.3d 1279, 1283 (9th Cir.2001).

PETITION DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.