alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 31990R3837 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31990R3837

**Council Regulation (EEC) No 3837/90 of 20 December 1990 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2997/87 laying down, in respect of hops, the amount of aid to producers for the 1986 harvest and providing for special measures for certain regions of production **

*
Official Journal L 367 , 29/12/1990 P. 0002 - 0002 *

COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) No 3837/90 of 20 December 1990 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2997/87 laying down, in respect of hops, the amount of aid to producers for the 1986 harvest and providing for special measures for certain regions of production

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, and in particular Articles 42 and 43 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission (1),

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (2),

Whereas, owing to the imbalance on the market for bitter varieties, Regulation (EEC) No 2997/87 (3), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1809/89 (4), provides for special measures of varietal conversion ; whereas varietal conversion in the hop sector would be more effective if it were combined with land consolidation measures ; whereas such land consolidation measures are currently being carried out in the hop growing regions of Spain ; whereas the entire hop area which is foreseen for varietal conversion must be subject to land consolidation prior to conversion ; whereas the time required for this land consolidation would not allow for the implementation of subsequent varietal conversion for a major part of the area in question within the time limits as provided for by Regulation (EEC) No 2997/87;

Whereas in order to allow Spanish hop growers to carry out the necessary measures for land consolidation without being excluded from participation in the varietal conversion programme of the Community, the time limit by which conversion plans may be implemented should be extended;

Whereas Regulation (EEC) No 2997/87 should therefore be amended,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The following subparagraph shall be added to Article 2 (1) of Regulation (EEC) No 2997/87:

"In the case of the Kingdom of Spain, the members of the producer groups concerned shall undertake to implement the conversion plans before 31 December 1994."

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 December 1990.

For the Council

The President

G. RUFFOLO

(1) OJ No C 279, 7.11.1990, p. 3. (2) Opinion delivered on 14 December 1990 (not yet published in the Official Journal). (3) OJ No L 284, 7.10.1987, p. 19. (4) OJ No L 177, 24.6.1989, p. 6.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 34 (Monday, February 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 7568]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3520]



[[Page 7568]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday March 5, 2010.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-3520 Filed 2-18-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          197689
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   208573
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                413078
<PP&E>                                        19066021
<DEPRECIATION>                                 4756461
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                23792864
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           430999
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    19294058
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  23792864
<SALES>                                          11333
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1360131
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   145619
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                350778
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               75865
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 799202
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             799202
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    799202
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    13.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    13.48
        

</TABLE>
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1065

To amend title 10, United States Code, to extend child care eligibility for 

children of members of the Armed Forces who die in the line of duty. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 18, 2005

Mr. THUNE (for himself and Mrs. CLINTON) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL

To amend title 10, United States Code, to extend child 

care eligibility for children of members of the Armed 

Forces who die in the line of duty.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF CHILD CARE ELIGIBILITY FOR 

4 CHILDREN OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED 

5 FORCES WHO DIE IN THE LINE OF DUTY. 

6 Section 1799 of title 10, United States Code, is 

7 amended by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(d) CHILDREN WHOSE MILITARY PARENT DIES IN

9 LINE OF DUTY.—If a member of the armed forces dies 

10 on active duty, or a member of a reserve component of 
2

•S 1065 IS 

1 the armed forces dies while in active service, any child of 

2 such member who is enrolled in a Federal child care pro3 gram shall be eligible to continue receiving services under 

4 such program for a period of 24 months following such 

5 death.’’.

Æ
Editorial Note on Part 102
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 102 appear at 81 FR 49895, July 29, 2016.

§ 102.26 Frozen “heat and serve” dinners. ( a ) A frozen “heat and serve” dinner: ( 1 ) Shall contain at least three components, one of which shall be a significant source of protein and each of which shall consist of one or more of the following: meat, poultry, fish, cheese, eggs, vegetables, fruit, potatoes, rice, or other cereal based products (other than bread or rolls).
( 2 ) May also contain other servings of food (e.g., soup, bread or rolls, beverage, dessert).
( b ) The common or usual name of the food consists of all of the following: ( 1 ) The phrase “frozen ‘heat and serve’ dinner,” except that the name of the predominant characterizing ingredient or other appropriately descriptive term may immediately precede the word “dinner” (e.g., “frozen chicken dinner” or “frozen heat and serve beef dinner”). The words “heat and serve” are optional. The word “frozen” is also optional, provided that the words “Keep Frozen” or the equivalent are prominently and conspicuously placed on the principal display panel in type size not less than that specified in § 102.5(b)(2)(i).
( 2 ) The phrase “containing (or contains) ______” the blank to be filled in with an accurate description of each of the three or more dish components listed in paragraph (a)(1) of this section in their order of descending predominance by weight (e.g., ham, mashed potatoes, and peas), followed by any of the other servings specified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section contained in the package (e.g., onion soup, enriched white bread, and artificially flavored vanilla pudding) in their order of descending predominance by weight. This part of the name shall be placed immediately following or directly below the part specified in paragraph (b)(1) of this section in the manner set forth in § 102.5(c)(3). The words “contains” or “containing” are optional.
( 3 ) If the labeling implies that the package contains other foods and these foods are not present in the package, e.g., if a vignette on the package depicts a “serving suggestion” which includes any foods not present in the package, the principal display panel shall bear a statement that such foods are not present, in type size not less than that specified in § 102.5(b)(2)(i).
### Surface water supply of the United States, 1961-65: Part 8, western Gulf of Mexico basins: Volume 2, basins from Lavaca River to Rio Grande

By: Water Resources Division, U.S. Geological Survey

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1923

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
###### Editorial Note on Part 184

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 184 appear at 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; and 81 FR 49897, July 29, 2016.

#### § 184.1563 Ozone.

(a) Ozone (O3, CAS Reg. No. 10028-15-6) is an unstable blue gas with a pungent, characteristic odor, which occurs freely in nature, It is produced commercially by passing electrical discharges or ionizing radiation through air or oxygen.

(b) The ingredient must be of a purity suitable for its intended use in accordance with § 170.30(h)(1) of this chapter.

(c) In accordance with § 184.1(b)(2), the ingredient is used to treat food only within the following specific limitations:

| Category of food | Maximum treatment level in food | Functional use |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Bottled water that prior to ozonation meets the microbiological, physical, chemical, and radiological quality standards of § 165.110 (b)(2) through (b)(5) of this chapter | Not to exceed current good manufacturing practice. Current good manufacturing practice results in a maximum residual level at the time of bottling of 0.4 milligram of ozone per liter of bottled water | Antimicrobial agent, § 170.3 (o)(2) of this chapter. |

[47 FR 50210, Nov. 5, 1982, as amended at 60 FR 57130, Nov. 13, 1995]
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7254 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7254

To direct the Administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid to 
  clarify that fully implanted active middle ear hearing devices are 
 prosthetics and are not subject to the hearing aid coverage exclusion 
                      under the Medicare program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 6, 2024

 Mrs. Fischbach (for herself, Ms. Craig, Mr. Emmer, Ms. McCollum, Mr. 
Finstad, Mr. Phillips, and Mr. Stauber) introduced the following bill; 
  which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in 
    addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid to 
  clarify that fully implanted active middle ear hearing devices are 
 prosthetics and are not subject to the hearing aid coverage exclusion 
                      under the Medicare program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Hearing Device Coverage 
Clarification Act''.

SEC. 2. ACTIVE MIDDLE EAR IMPLANT COVERAGE.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 60 days after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid 
Services shall clarify that fully implanted active middle ear hearing 
devices are prosthetics that are not subject to the hearing aid 
coverage exclusion under section 1862(a)(7) of the Social Security Act 
(42 U.S.C. 1395y(a)(7)).
    (b) Prosthetic Defined.--The term ``prosthetic'' has the meaning 
given such term in section 414.202 of title 42, Code of Federal 
Regulations.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-2477

EDWARD L. FLOYD, Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-99-191-BR-5) Submitted: April 13, 2001 Decided: May 2, 2001 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed in part and affirmed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edward L. Floyd, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Samuel Williamson, Jr., COVINGTON & BURLING, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Edward L. Floyd appeals the district court's orders dismissing with prejudice his Fair Labor Standards Act suit and denying his motion for reconsideration of that order. Parties are accorded thirty days after entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corr. , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court’s order dismissing Floyd’s suit was enteredon the court’s docket on July 20, 2000. Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed on October 24, 2000. Floyd did not file his motionto reconsider within ten days of the district court's order dismissing his suit, consequently the time period for filing his appeal of that order was not tolled. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4); Panhorst v. United States , 241 F.3d 367, 370 (4th Cir. 2001). Therefore, Floyd's appeal is timely only as to the district court's denial of his subsequent motion for reconsideration, construed here under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). See, e.g. , Small v. Hunt , 98 F.3d 789, 797 (4th Cir. 1996).3 This Court reviews a denial of a Rule 60(b) motion for abuse of discretion. See NOW v. Operation Rescue , 47 F.3d 667, 669 (4th Cir. 1995) (per curiam). We have reviewed the record and concludethat the district court's denial of Floyd's motion for reconsideration was not an abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we dismiss Floyd's appeal of the district court's order dismissing with prejudice his Fair Labor Standards Act suitfor lack of jurisdiction because Floyd's notice of appeal was untimely as to that order. We affirm the district court's denial of Floyd's motion for reconsideration. Floyd's motion for leave tofile a reply brief is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED IN PART; AFFIRMED IN PART
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 2, 2017

a0424

Order 

Clerk

May 2, 2017

154166-7

ANTHONY V. MARROCCO,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 154166-7

COA: 326575; 327614

Macomb CC: 2013-002615-CZ

OAKLAND MACOMB INTERCEPTOR DRAIN

DRAINAGE DISTRICT, JIM NASH, and

MICHAEL GREGG,

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 16, 2016 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

VIVIANO, J., did not participate due to a familial relationship with counsel of 

record. MCR 2.003(C)(1)(g)(ii).
Paul Gretch Director, Office of International Aviation U .S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue S.E. Washington, DC 20590 U.S.A.

Dear Mr. Gretch, In reference to the intentions of the Danish air carrier ExecuJet**Ey~** rope A/S to conduct non-scheduled (charter) air services to and from the United States the Danish Transport Authority hereby confirms it will act in conformity with all provisions of the Air Transport**Agree~** ment between the European Community and its Member States and the United States of America of April 2007, as amended. Yours sincerely,

# ~ Senior Adviser

Page 1 (1) Edvard Thomsens Vej 14 DK-2300 Copenhagen 

### s

Phone +45 7221 8800 info@trafikstyrelsen.dk www.trafikstyrelsen .dk Our ref. : TS30200-00017 23 August 2012



# •**~'r;msportmlnistcrict**
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 21 


Subsidiaries of the Registrant:

         Bell Electronics Corp. (California)                        (*)
         Bell Industries, Inc. (Minnesota)
         J. W. Miller Company (California)                          (*)
         Industrial Photographic Supply, Inc. (Texas)
         Milgray International, Inc. (New York)                        
         Milgray LTD (New York)                                        
         Milgray/Toronto, Inc. (Ontario, Canada)                       
         Viewtek, Inc. (New York)                                      
         Bell Ontario Holding, Inc. (California)


All companies listed are wholly owned by the Registrant (Bell Industries, Inc.
of California) and are included in the consolidated financial statements.

(*)      Inactive.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 3, 2018

No. 04-18-00418-CV

IN RE WOOD GROUP PSN INC., Miller Environmental Services L.L.C., Star Tex Gasoline 

& Oil Distributors Inc., Basic Energy Services Inc., Cameron Inc., Chacho’s Vacuum Service 

Inc., Coastal Chemical Co. L.L.C., Flint Energy Services Inc., FTS International Services L.L.C., 

Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co., Mission Petroleum Carriers Inc., Murphy 

Exploration & Production Company - USA, Murphy Oil Corporation, Plains All American 

Pipeline L.P.

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

On June 22, 2018, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus, the real party in interest 

responded, and relators replied. After reviewing the petition, the response, and the reply, we 

conclude relators are entitled in part to the relief requested. Accordingly, the petition for writ of 

mandamus is CONDITIONALLY GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. TEX. R. APP.

P. 52.8(c).

The Honorable Amado J. Abascal, III is ORDERED to (1) vacate that portion of his order 

denying the Rule 91a motion to dismiss; and (2) grant the Rule 91a motion to dismiss. The writ 

will issue only in the event the trial court fails to comply within fifteen days from the date of this 

order. In all other respects the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.

It is so ORDERED on October 3, 2018.

_____________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 3rd day of October, 2018.

_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 13-05-11980-DCVAJA, styled County of Dimmit v. Murphy Exploration & 

Production Co., et al., pending in the 365th Judicial District Court, Dimmit County, Texas, the Honorable Amado J. 

Abascal, III presiding.
[No. 39369-3-I.

Division One.

November 3, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Taffero DeRay Wright, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 95-1-00658-9, Richard M. Ishikawa, J., entered August 22, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Editorial Note on Part 173
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 173 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; and 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 173.405 Sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate. Sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate (CAS No. 25155-30-0) may be safely used in accordance with the following prescribed conditions: ( a ) The additive is an antimicrobial agent used in wash water for fruits and vegetables. The additive may be used at a level not to exceed 111 milligrams per kilogram in the wash water. Fruits and vegetables treated by the additive do not require a potable water rinse.
( b ) The additive is limited to use in commissaries, cafeterias, restaurants, retail food establishments, nonprofit food establishments, and other food service operations in which food is prepared for or served directly to the consumer.
( c ) To assure safe use of the additive, the label or labeling of the additive container shall bear, in addition to the other information required by the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, adequate directions to assure use in compliance with the provisions of this section.
[77 FR 71697, Dec. 4, 2012]