alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Hours and Conditions of Work for Women in Industry in Virginia

              																	United States. Women's Bureau					 and 	Winslow, Mary N. (Mary Nelson). 						*Hours and Conditions of Work for Women in Industry in Virginia : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 10*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										March 1920,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5338,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
_'-_V_I_I_.I_._IA_l'_'l_A_._S_P_O_J_A_,_J_R_. ____ _Attornf''J al-~_dJ!J.~:-__ \.~,.;-· F;,_·.-'-"---------------

THIRD AND BROADWAY 

P.O. BOX 882 

LEWISTOWN, MONTANA 59457 

<:: -· : _: 

April 11, 2013 

Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30 

West Building Ground Floor 

Room W 12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Docket DOT-OST-1997-2605 

TELEPHONE (406) 538-8767 

FAX (406) 538·5861 

This is to inform the Department of my objection to the termination of EAS 

Eligibility for Lewistown, Montana. 

The termination of this service leaves this far-flung county of more than 

15,000 people without ANY INTERCITY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION WHATSOEVER. 

I find this to be a serious matter since it leaves hundreds of folks stranded 

in this city with no way to leave except by private vehicle, should one even be 

available. Then it would be at the mercy of others who may be going to the 

places our people need to go. For instance, how do the elderly get to their 

cardiologist or oncologist? In the large centers of the United States this is 

probably difficult to even imagine. In the remote center of Montana, however, 

it is reality. 

If this service were connected to Denver, CO, it would be possible for people 

to make the arrangements necessary. If however, they cannot even get out of 

town, they are even stranded without the availability of some necessary life 

saving services. 

We have had a flight connecting us to Billings, MT. This apparently was 

unsatisfactory for some. This was something I could use. 

My plea is that you either restore the Billings service or, perhaps even 

better, return to the Denver connection. 

Thank you for your help. 

Sincerely, 

William A. Spoja, Jr. 

C: dennis.devany@dot.gov, scott.faulk@dot.gov, eas@dot.gov 

Senator Baucus; Senator Tester
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.A

COLUMBIA BANCORP                      420 E THIRD ST., SUITE 200
                                      THE DALLES, OR 97058

CONTACT:                              CONTACT:
BRUCE BRYANT                          TERRY COCHRAN
PRESIDENT AND CEO VALLEY              PRESIDENT AND CEO, COLUMBIA BANCORP
COMMUNITY BANK                        541-298-6611
503-472-0534

December 1, 1998
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

      The Dalles, Oregon, -- Columbia Bancorp (Nasdaq: CBBO), an Oregon-based
bank holding company, announced today the completion of its acquisition of
Valley Community Bancorp. The acquisition brings Columbia Bancorp's total assets
to approximately $316 million, based on reported financial information as of
September 30, 1998.

      Valley Community Bancorp shareholders received $16.30 cash for each share
of Valley Community Bancorp common stock in a transaction with a total value of
$15.1 million.

      Valley Community Bancorp's banking subsidiary, Valley Community Bank, is
based in McMinnville, Oregon. Bruce Bryant, Valley Community Bank's President
since 1987, will continue in that role, and the Bank remains in operation as a
separate subsidiary under the Valley Community Bank name. "We are pleased with
the combination of the two companies, and we look forward to offering additional
services to our Valley Community Bank customers as a result of the acquisition,"
said Bryant. "Columbia Bancorp has a strong commitment to providing personalized
community banking services, which is consistent with Valley Community Bank's
face-to-face approach to banking."

      Columbia Bancorp is the holding company for Columbia River Bank, which
operates nine branches located in The Dalles, Hood River, Bend, Madras, Redmond
and Hermiston, Oregon, and in Goldendale and White Salmon, Washington. Columbia
River Bank is proceeding with plans to open a new bank branch in Pendleton,
Oregon, which is the largest town in eastern Oregon. The Bank is also on
schedule to open its second Columbia River Bank branch in Bend, Oregon by
mid-1999.

      In addition to its community banking services, Columbia River Bank also
provides mortgage lending services through its Columbia River Bank Mortgage
Group, and brokerage services through its affiliation with PrimeVest Financial
Services, Inc.

      "At Columbia we are pleased with the acquisition and the opportunity to
expand into the Willamette Valley," states Terry Cochran, President and CEO of
Columbia Bancorp. "Our mission remains unchanged: to provide increasing
shareholder value by offering superior financial services in the communities we
serve."

                                      # # #


                                       3
Editorial Note on Part 173
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 173 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; and 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 173.20 Ion-exchange membranes. Ion-exchange membranes may be safely used in the processing of food under the following prescribed conditions: ( a ) The ion-exchange membrane is prepared by subjecting a polyethylene base conforming to § 177.1520 of this chapter to polymerization with styrene until the polystyrene phase of the base is not less than 16 percent nor more than 30 percent by weight. The base is then modified by reaction with chloromethyl methyl ether, and by subsequent amination with trimethylamine, dimethylamine, diethylenetriamine, or dimethylethanolamine.
( b ) The ion-exchange membrane is manufactured so as to comply with the following extraction limitations when subjected to the described procedure: Separate square-foot samples of membrane weighing approximately 14 grams each are cut into small pieces and refluxed for 4 hours in 150 cubic centimeters of the following solvents: Distilled water, 5 percent acetic acid, and 50 percent alcohol. Extraction from each sample will not exceed 0.4 percent by weight of sample.
( c ) The ion-exchange membrane will be used in the production of grapefruit juice to adjust the ratio of citric acid to total solids of the grapefruit juice produced.
§ 1305.16 Lost and stolen DEA Forms 222. ( a ) If a purchaser ascertains that an unfilled DEA Form 222 has been lost, the purchaser must execute another and attach a statement containing the order form number and date of the lost form, and stating that the goods covered by the first DEA Form 222 were not received through loss of that DEA Form 222. A copy of the second form and a copy of the statement must be retained with a copy of the DEA Form 222 first executed. A copy of the statement must be attached to a copy of the second DEA Form 222 sent to the supplier. If the first DEA Form 222 is subsequently received by the supplier to whom it was directed, the supplier must mark upon the face “Not accepted” and return the original DEA Form 222 to the purchaser, who must attach it to the statement.
( b ) Whenever any used or unused DEA Forms 222 are stolen or lost (other than in the course of transmission) by any purchaser or supplier, the purchaser or supplier must immediately upon discovery of the theft or loss, report the theft or loss to the Special Agent in Charge of the Drug Enforcement Administration in the Divisional Office responsible for the area in which the registrant is located, stating the serial number of each form stolen or lost.
( c ) If the theft or loss includes any original DEA Forms 222 received from purchasers and the supplier is unable to state the serial numbers of the DEA Forms 222, the supplier must report the date or approximate date of receipt and the names and addresses of the purchasers.
( d ) If any DEA Forms 222 are lost or stolen, and the purchaser is unable to state the order form numbers of the DEA Forms 222, the purchaser must report, in lieu of numbers of the forms, the date or approximate date of issuance.
( e ) If any unused DEA Form 222 reported stolen or lost is subsequently recovered or found, the Special Agent in Charge of the Drug Enforcement Administration in the Divisional Office responsible for the area in which the registrant is located must immediately be notified.
[70 FR 16911, Apr. 1, 2005, as amended at 84 FR 51375, Sept. 30, 2019]
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

VASSILY ANTHONY THOMPSON,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 20

- 30138

D.C. No. 2:16

- cr

- 00145

- TOR

- 1

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Washington Thomas O. Rice, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 15, 2022 * *

Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Vassily Anthony Thompson appeals from the district court’s order s denying

his motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) and

motion for reconsideration

. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291

.

Rev iewing for abuse of discretion, see United States v. Aruda , 993 F.3d 797, 799

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

FEB 22 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 20

- 30138

(9th Cir. 2021) , we affirm.

Thompson contends that the district court erred by applying U.S.S.G.

§ 1B1.13 , and by finding that he presents an ongoing danger. The record shows,

however, that the district court viewed § 1B1.13 as “guidance” and found that it

had the discretion to consider reasons beyond those enumerated in the Guideline

,

which comports with Aruda

. See 993 F.3d at 80 1

- 0 2. Further, contrary to

Thompson’s assertion, the record shows that the district court considered all of the

ar guments Thompson advanced in support of his motions. Finally, the court’s

conclusion that Thompson’s release would pose a danger to the public was

supported by Thompson’s behavior while on pre

- trial release, as well as the court’s

conclusion under 18 U.S. C. § 3553(a) that the sentence imposed was necessary “to

protect the public from defendant’s fraudulent conduct.” As the court explained,

the § 3553(a) sentencing factors continued to support th at sentence in light of

Thompson’s offense conduct and the needs to reflect the seriousness of the offense,

promote respect for the law, provide just punishment, and afford adequate

deterrence. The court did not abuse its discretion in denying relief. See United

States v. Keller

, 2 F.4th 1278, 1284 (9th Cir. 2021); United States v. Robertson

,

895 F.3d 1206, 1213 (9th Cir. 2018) (district court abuses its discretion only if its

decision is illogical, implausible, or not supported by the record ).

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 23.1



               Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-92034) pertaining to the Ride Snowboard Company 1994 Stock
Option Plan and Ride Snowboard Company 1994 Directors~ Nonqualified Stock
Option Plan and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-81029)
pertaining to the Ride, Inc. 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and Ride, Inc.
foreign Subsidiary 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of our report dated
February 28, 1997, except for Note 14 for which the date is March 14, 1997,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Ride,
Inc. included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
1996 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


Seattle, Washington
March 28, 1997                                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-92,172-01

EX PARTE STEVEN LAMONTE WILLIAMS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 649626-A IN THE 178TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant pleaded guilty to aggravated sexual assault and was sentenced to fifty years’

imprisonment. He filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and

the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends, among other things, that a 2013 lab report in the record excludes him

as a contributor to DNA profiles. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. 

Ex parte Elizondo, 947 S.W.2d 202 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Accordingly, the record should be

developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX.CODE CRIM. PROC. art.

11.07, § 3(d). In developing the record, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07,

§ 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. 
2

If he is indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to

represent him at the hearing. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or

retained, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s name.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant

has presented newly available or discovered evidence that proves by clear and convincing evidence

that he is actually innocent. The trial court may make any other findings and conclusions that it

deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX.R.APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court.

Filed: February 10, 2021

Do not publish
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Date:*                         March 14-16, 2011.                    

*Time:*                         6 p.m. to 12 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         JW Marriott, 900 W. Olympic Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90015.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Manana Sukhareva, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, National Institutes of Health, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 959, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-451-3397,                         *sukharem@mail.nih.gov.*

Dated: December 29, 2010.

Anna P. Snouffer,

Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-33325 Filed 1-4-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection with the accompanying amended Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB/A of Velocity Asset Management Inc. for the three months ended September
30, 2005, I, John C. Kleinert, Chief Executive Officer of Velocity Asset
Management, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) such amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the three
months ended September 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) the information contained in such amended Quarterly Report
on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended September 30, 2005, fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Velocity Asset Management, Inc.

                                               /s/ JOHN C. KLEINERT
                                               --------------------------------
                                               John C. Kleinert
                                               Chief Executive Officer


         November 18, 2005

                                       28
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 0 1 73 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JOSEPH PAUL DEWISE,

Defendant and Appellant .

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including February 8, 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 31 2020

12/31/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0173
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I, Thian Hoo Tan, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
October 3, 2004 of Komag, Incorporated;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this report fairly present, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a - 15(e) and 15d - 15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors:

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize, and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

      DATE: November 5, 2004                BY: /s/ Thian Hoo Tan
                                                --------------------------------

                                            Thian Hoo Tan
                                            Chief Executive Officer
§ 1.918 What must be included in the Statement of Grounds in a petition requesting a waiver? In addition to the requirements set forth in § 10.30 of this chapter, the Statement of Grounds in a petition requesting a waiver must: ( a ) Describe with particularity the waiver requested, including the persons, vehicles, food, or nonfood product(s) to which the waiver would apply and the requirement(s) of this subpart to which the waiver would apply; and
( b ) Present information demonstrating that the waiver will not result in the transportation of food under conditions that would be unsafe for human or animal health and will not be contrary to the public interest.