alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 20.107 Food and Drug Administration manuals. ( a ) Food and Drug Administration administrative staff manuals and instructions that affect a member of the public are available for public disclosure. An index of all such manuals is available by writing to the Division of Freedom of Informationat the address located on the agency's web site at *http://www.fda.gov .*; or by visiting the Division of Freedom of Information Public Reading Room, located in rm. 1050, at the same address. The index and all manuals created by the agency on or after November 1, 1996, will be made available through the Internet at *http://www.fda.gov .*
( b ) Manuals relating solely to internal personnel rules and practices are not available for public disclosure except to the extent that the Commissioner determines that they should be disclosed pursuant to § 20.82.
( c ) All Food and Drug Administration action levels which are used to determine when the agency will take regulatory action against a violative product, limits of sensitivity and variability of analytical methods which are used in determining whether a product violates the law, and direct reference levels above which Food and Drug Administration field offices may request legal action directly to the office of the General Counsel, are available for public disclosure.
[42 FR 15616, Mar. 22, 1977, as amended at 46 FR 8457, Jan. 27, 1981; 46 FR 14340, Feb. 27, 1981; 68 FR 25287, May 12, 2003; 76 FR 31469, June 1, 2011; 79 FR 68115, Nov. 14, 2014]
[Nos. 14579-4-III; 14580-8-III.

Division Three.

October 28, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Ellsworth R. Robbins, et al., *Appellants.*

Appeals from judgments of the Superior Court for Okanogan County, Nos. 94-2-00170-3 and 94-2-00246-7, Jack Burchard, J., entered December 5, 1994. *Affirmed in part, reversed in part,*and *remanded*by unpublished opinion per Kurtz, J., concurred in by Sweeney, C.J., and Schultheis, J.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 20, 2017

a1213

Order 

Clerk

December 20, 2017

155379 & (92)

RIC-MAN CONSTRUCTION, INC.,

Plaintiff/Counterdefendant- Appellant/Cross-Appellee,

v SC: 155379

COA: 329159 

Wayne CC: 11-011315-CZ

NEYER, TISEO & HINDO LTD. d/b/a

NTH CONSULTANTS, LTD.,

Defendant/Counterplaintiff- Appellee/Cross-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 17, 2017 

judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as crossappellant are considered, and they are DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the 

questions presented should now be reviewed by this Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7244 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7244

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat transfers of 
 appreciated property to certain tax-exempt organizations the same as 
     transfers of appreciated property to political organizations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 6, 2024

   Ms. Chu (for herself, Ms. Schakowsky, Ms. Norton, Mr. Gomez, Mr. 
Raskin, Ms. Balint, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, Mrs. Ramirez, Mr. Davis of 
    Illinois, Ms. Lee of Pennsylvania, Mr. Garcia of Illinois, Mr. 
Grijalva, Ms. Tlaib, Mrs. Watson Coleman, and Ms. Williams of Georgia) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat transfers of 
 appreciated property to certain tax-exempt organizations the same as 
     transfers of appreciated property to political organizations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``End Tax Breaks for Dark Money Act''.

SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF TRANSFERS OF APPRECIATED PROPERTY TO CERTAIN TAX-
              EXEMPT ORGANIZATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Subsections (a) and (b) of section 84 of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 are each amended by striking ``political 
organization'' each place it appears and inserting ``specified 
organization''.
    (b) Specified Organization.--Section 84(c) of the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows:
    ``(c) Specified Organization.--For purposes of this section, the 
term `specified organization' means--
            ``(1) any political organization (as defined in section 
        527(e)(1)), and
            ``(2) any organization described in paragraph (4), (5), or 
        (6) of section 501(c).''.
    (c) Clerical Amendments.--
            (1) The heading of section 84 of the Internal Revenue Code 
        of 1986 is amended by striking ``political'' and inserting 
        ``specified''.
            (2) The item relating to section 84 in the table of 
        sections for part II of subchapter B of chapter 1 of such Code 
        is amended to read as follows:

``Sec. 84. Transfer of appreciated property to specified 
                            organizations.''.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to transfer after the date of the enactment of this Act, in 
taxable years ending after such date.
                                 <all>
```
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 71 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to exempt from 

regulation as devices non-invasive diagnostic devices, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to 

exempt from regulation as devices non-invasive diagnostic 

devices, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medical Innovation Ac5 celeration Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXEMPTING NON-INVASIVE DIAGNOSTIC DEVICES 

7 FROM REGULATION AS DEVICES. 

8 Section 201(h) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cos9 metic Act (21 U.S.C. 321(h)) is amended— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 71 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘section 520(o)’’ and inserting 

2 the following: ‘‘section 520(o) or any non-invasive di3 agnostic device’’; and 

4 (2) by adding at the end the following: ‘‘For 

5 purposes of the preceding sentence, the term ‘non6 invasive’ means, with respect to a diagnostic device, 

7 that the device does not penetrate the skin or any 

8 other membrane of the body, is not inserted or im9 planted into the body, causes no more than ephem10 eral compression or temperature changes to in situ 

11 bodily tissues, and does not subject bodily tissues to 

12 ionizing radiation.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
[No. 15502-1-III.

Division Three.

December 18, 1997.]

#### *In the Matter of the Marriage of*Sharon L. Kelley, *Respondent,*and Michael J. Kelley, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Grant County, No. 94-3-00329-1, Kenneth L. Jorgensen, J., entered January 3, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Schultheis, J., concurred in by Sweeney, C.J., and Kurtz, J.
§ 133.171 Pasteurized process pimento cheese. Pasteurized process pimento cheese is the food which conforms to the definition and standard of identity for pasteurized process cheese with fruits, vegetables, or meats, and is subject to the requirement for label statement of ingredients, except that: ( a ) Its moisture content is not more than 41 percent, and the fat content of its solids is not less than 49 percent.
( b ) The cheese ingredient is cheddar cheese, washed curd cheese, colby cheese, granular cheese or any mixture of two or more of these in any proportion.
( c ) For the purposes of this section, cheddar cheese for manufacturing, washed curd cheese for manufacturing, colby cheese for manufacturing, and granular cheese for manufacturing shall be considered as cheddar cheese, washed curd cheese, colby cheese, and granular cheese, respectively.
( d ) The only fruit, vegetable, or meat ingredient is pimentos in such quantity that the weight of the solids thereof is not less than 0.2 percent of the weight of the finished pasteurized process pimento cheese.
( e ) The optional ingredients designated in § 133.169(b) and (d)(6) are not used.
[42 FR 14366, Mar. 15, 1977, as amended at 58 FR 2894, Jan. 6, 1993]
Editorial Note on Part 184
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 184 appear at 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; and 81 FR 49897, July 29, 2016.

§ 184.1445 Malt syrup (malt extract). ( a ) Malt is the product of barley (*Hordeum vulgare* L.) germinated under controlled conditions. Malt syrup and malt extract are interchangeable terms for a viscous concentrate of water extract of germinated barley grain, with or without added safe preservative. Malt syrup is usually a brown, sweet, and viscous liquid containing varying amounts of amylolytic enzymes and plant constituents. Barley is first softened after cleaning by steeping operations and then allowed to germinate under controlled conditions. The germinated grain then undergoes processing, such as drying, grinding, extracting, filtering, and evaporating, to produce malt syrup (malt extract) with 75 to 80 percent solids or dried malt syrup with higher solids content.
( b ) The ingredient must be of a purity suitable for its intended use.
( c ) In accordance with § 184.1(b)(1), the ingredient is used in food with no limitation other than current good manufacturing practice. The affirmation of this ingredient as generally recognized as safe (GRAS) as a direct human food ingredient is based upon the following current good manufacturing practice conditions of use: ( 1 ) The ingredient is used as a flavoring agent and adjuvant as defined in § 170.3(o)(12) of this chapter.
( 2 ) The ingredient is used in food at levels not to exceed current good manufacturing practice.
( d ) Prior sanctions for this ingredient different from the uses established in this section do not exist or have been waived.
[48 FR 51613, Nov. 10, 1983, as amended at 73 FR 8607, Feb. 14, 2008]
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7104 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7104

  To require the National Small Business Development Center Advisory 
  Board to submit an annual report on the activities of the Board and 
               other information, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 29, 2024

Mr. Mann (for himself and Mr. Golden of Maine) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the National Small Business Development Center Advisory 
  Board to submit an annual report on the activities of the Board and 
               other information, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National SBDC Advisory Board 
Improvement Act''.

SEC. 2. NATIONAL SMALL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CENTER ADVISORY BOARD 
              ANNUAL REPORT.

    (a) In General.--Section 21(i) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 
648(i)) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(3) The Board shall annually submit to the Associate 
        Administrator for Small Business Development Centers, the 
        Committee on Small Business of the House of Representatives, 
        and the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship of 
        Senate a report on the activities of the Board during the year 
        covered by the report, including--
                    ``(A) any recommendations of the Board for 
                improving the small business development center 
                program; and
                    ``(B) such other information with respect to such 
                program that the Board determines appropriate.''.
    (b) Compliance With Cutgo.--No additional amounts are authorized to 
be appropriated to carry out this Act or the amendments made by this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.21
                                      No. 2

                           SPECIAL RETENTION AGREEMENT


     This  Agreement  is entered  into this 18th day of  September,  2000 by and
between AMCOL  International  Corporation  ("Company") and Frank B. Wright,  Jr.
("Employee").

     WHEREAS, the Company considers it essential and in the best interest of the
Company  and  its  Shareholders  to  foster  the  continued  employment  of  key
management personnel;

     WHEREAS, Frank B. Wright, Jr. is presently employed as President of Volclay
International, Inc.


     IT IS THEREFORE AGREED AS FOLLOWS:

     1.  The  Company  will  pay to  Employee  the  amount  of  $250,000.00,  as
consideration  for  the  Employee  remaining  employed  by  the  Company  or its
subsidiaries and continuing his or her duties until the completion of *.

     2. No payment is due in the event the Employee  shall  terminate his or her
employment,  directly or indirectly, prior to a change in control or such change
in  control  does not occur  within one year from the date  hereof.  A change in
control  is  defined  as: the  change in the legal or  beneficial  ownership  of
fifty-one  percent  (51%) of the shares of the  Company's  common stock within a
six-month  period other than by death or operation of law, or the sale of ninety
percent  (90%) or more of the  Company's  aggregate  assets  within a  six-month
period.  Sale of the Company's  stock in a subsidiary or a  subsidiary's  assets
shall not be considered a Change in Control.

     3. The Company may terminate  Employee at any time,  with or without cause,
although  termination  without  cause by the  Company  within one (1) month of a
change in control shall be considered a termination upon a change in control.



*    An asterisk  represents certain material which has been omitted pursuant to
     a request for confidential treatment filed with the Securities and Exchange
     Commission.  Such omitted  material has been filed separately with the SEC.
<PAGE>
     4. The  Employee  shall also be  considered  an  employee of the Company if
employed by a subsidiary.

     5. Any  payments  received  pursuant  to this  Agreement  shall be credited
against any payments due under any Change in Control Agreement, the Employee has
with the Company.

     6. The payment  pursuant to this Agreement shall be made upon completion of
*.

     7. This Agreement shall expire one (1) year from the date hereof.



                                            AMCOL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION


                                            By:       /s/ Larry Washow
                                            Title:    President



                                            EMPLOYEE:


                                             /s/ Frank B. Wright, Jr.
                                            Frank B. Wright, Jr.
[No. 40047-9-I.

Division One.

November 3, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Marshall Devonne Bennett, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 96-8-01907-2, Anthony P. Wartnik, J., entered January 8, 1997. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000945801
<NAME> MINIMED,INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-02-1998
<CASH>                                         $22,282
<SECURITIES>                                   $18,713
<RECEIVABLES>                                  $30,911
<ALLOWANCES>                                    $6,250
<INVENTORY>                                    $10,672
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               $83,410
<PP&E>                                         $23,599
<DEPRECIATION>                                  $6,656
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                $105,819
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,001
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                          $135
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     $82,948
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   $83,083
<SALES>                                        $99,492
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              $102,908
<CGS>                                          $38,704
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  $90,388
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                $1,218
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                $237
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                $10,718
<INCOME-TAX>                                    $4,029
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             $6,689
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    $6,689
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $0.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.52
        

</TABLE>
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7181 

To require the Secretary of State to submit a report ranking the organizations 

of the United Nations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2024 

Mr. CURTIS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of State to submit a report ranking 

the organizations of the United Nations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Determining Excessive 

5 Funding for the United Nations for Dereliction Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. RANKING REPORT. 

7 The Secretary of State shall submit to Congress a 

8 report listing each organization of the United Nations, 

9 ranked by the manner and extent to which, in the deterVerDate Sep 11 2014 20:56 Feb 06, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H7181.IH H7181

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7181 IH

1 mination of the Secretary of State, such organization is 

2 vital to the interests of the United States. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
§ 1314.25 Requirements for retail transactions. ( a ) Each regulated seller must ensure that sales of a scheduled listed chemical product at retail are made in accordance with this section and § 1314.20.
( b ) The regulated seller must place the product so that customers do not have direct access to the product before the sale is made (in this paragraph referred to as “behind-the-counter” placement). For purposes of this paragraph, a behind-the-counter placement of a product includes circumstances in which the product is stored in a locked cabinet that is located in an area of the facility where customers do have direct access. Mobile retail vendors must place the product in a locked cabinet.
( c ) The regulated seller must deliver the product directly into the custody of the purchaser.
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 329 

Recognizing the significance of the hundredth anniversary of the soda 

Cheerwine. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 17, 2017 

Mr. BUDD submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the significance of the hundredth anniversary 

of the soda Cheerwine. 

Whereas Cheerwine was founded in Salisbury, North Carolina, in 1917 by Lewis D. Peeler; 

Whereas Cheerwine is a family-owned and -operated business 

and the oldest family-owned soft drink company in the 

United States; 

Whereas Cheerwine was the first bottled cherry-flavored soda 

in the United States; 

Whereas Clifford Peeler took over the company in 1931 and 

helped guide the company through the Great Depression; 

Whereas Cheerwine was enjoyed by President Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1953; 


rfrederick on DSK30NT082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 329 IH 

Whereas in the 1970s, Cliff and Mark Ritchie joined the family business and expanded Cheerwine’s presence; 

Whereas in 1992, Mark Ritchie took over the company, and 

Cheerwine was enjoyed by a second President, George H. 

W. Bush, in Salisbury, North Carolina; and 

Whereas this family-owned and -operated institution, now run 

by L.D. Peeler’s great-grandson, Cliff Ritchie, celebrates 

its hundredth birthday in 2017: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the significance of the hundredth 

3 anniversary of the soda Cheerwine and acknowledges 

4 its contribution to North Carolina’s vibrant food cul5 ture and unique local character; 

6 (2) recognizes that Cheerwine is an important 

7 part of North Carolina’s heritage and culture; and 

8 (3) recognizes that family businesses such as 

9 Cheerwine provide good-paying jobs and are the 

10 building blocks of the United States economy. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK30NT082PROD with BILLS