alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Geology and ground-water resources of the Paducah area, Kentucky

By: Henry Louis PreeW.H. WalkerL.M. MacCary

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1417

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 7**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 8**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 9**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### § 1250.22 General requirements.

All food and drink served on conveyances shall be clean, wholesome, and free from spoilage, and shall be prepared, stored, handled, and served in accordance with the requirements prescribed in this subpart and § 1240.20 of this chapter.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                             471
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,678
<ALLOWANCES>                                        51
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,764
<PP&E>                                             471
<DEPRECIATION>                                     277
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,015
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,713
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,536
<OTHER-SE>                                        (234)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,015
<SALES>                                         11,065
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,065
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,494
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,389
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 207
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    975
<INCOME-TAX>                                       380
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,355
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,355
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.17


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I, Daniel W. Dowe, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
(principal executive officer and principal financial officer), of Novex Systems
International, Inc., (the "Company"), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, certify that:

      (1)   In connection with the Annual Report of the Company on form 10-KSB
            for the twelve month period ended May 31, 2004, as filed with the
            Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
            "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and
            Section 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
            of the Company for the period presented therein..

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                      By: /s/ Daniel W. Dowe
                                         -----------------------------------
                                             Daniel W. Dowe
                                             Chief Executive Officer and
                                             Chief Financial Officer

                                      Date: October 14, 2004
IIB 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7158 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 5, 2024 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 201 East Battles Road in Santa Maria, California, as the ‘‘Larry Lavagnino Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

HR 7158 RFS

1 SECTION 1. LARRY LAVAGNINO POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 201 East Battles Road in Santa 

4 Maria, California, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘Larry Lavagnino Post Office Building’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Larry Lavagnino Post 

10 Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 4, 

2024. 

Attest: KEVIN F. MCCUMBER, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
#### Shirley ROTHENBERG, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SECURITY MANAGEMENT CO., INC., Defendant, Invesco International, Inc., Defendant-Appellant. Shirley ROTHENBERG, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SECURITY MANAGEMENT CO., INC., Invesco International, Inc., Bruce R. Davis, Sandra Davis, Daniel Burke, Louis Brenner, George S. Stern, Sidney I. Rose, Ralph Becker, Ronald I. Levin and Saul Becker, Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 81-7489, 81-7534

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

May 24, 1982.

Smith, Shaw, Maddox, Davidson & Graham, Oscar M. Smith, John M. Graham, III, Rome, Ga., for Invesco Intern.

Robert J. Hippie, Atlanta, Ga., for Shirley Rothenberg.

Cotton, Katz & White, J. Michael Lam-berth, Atlanta, Ga., for Security Management Co., Bruce R. Davis, Sandra Davis, Daniel Burke and Louis Brenner.

Slutzky, Wolfe & Bailey, Danny Bailey, Atlanta, Ga., for RHF Trust through Louis Brenner, Carl Davis and Martha Davis.

Daniel MacIntyre, Atlanta, Ga., for movants Michael and Carol A. Pisano.

Lefkoff, Pike & Fox, Joseph Lefkoff, George Fox, Atlanta, Ga., for Saul Becker and Ralph Becker.

Before RONEY, KRAVITCH and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

CLARK, Circuit Judge:

The only issue presented in the instant appeal is whether the court below had jurisdiction to entertain a motion for an award of attorney’s fees which was filed after a notice of appeal had been filed, but prior to expiration of the local time period for filing a bill of costs. The district court ruled that it did not have jurisdiction; we reverse its judgment.

It is well settled in this circuit that costs may be taxed after a notice of appeal has been filed. *Baum v. United States,*432 F.2d 85 (5th Cir. 1970); *United States v. Kolesar,*313 F.2d 835 (5th Cir. 1963). We have the guidance, which the district court did not, of the recent Supreme Court case of *White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment Security,*- U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 1162, 71 L.Ed.2d 325 (1982). There, *65the Supreme Court held that a request for attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 is not a motion to amend the judgment and therefore Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) is not applicable when such fees are requested. *Knighton v. Watkins,*616 F.2d 795 (5th Cir. 1980), held that a request for attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 is treated as a motion for costs under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d).1

Following from the above, we hold that the request for attorney’s fees in the instant case was a motion for costs which the district court had jurisdiction over despite the filing of the notice of appeal. The statute under which attorney’s fees are sought, Ga.Code § 22-615(e), is similar in language to 42 U.S.C. § 1988. Thus, we find no basis to distinguish the instant situation from those cases arising under 42 U.S.C. § 1988. Therefore, we reverse the district court and remand for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

1

. The Eleventh Circuit, in the en banc decision of *Bonner v. City of Prichard,*661 F.2d 1206 (11th Cir. 1981), adopted as precedent the decisions of the former Fifth Circuit decided prior to October 1, 1981.
38324.

#### COVINGTON v. S. H. KRESS & COMPANY.

Decided July 15, 1960.

*205*0. Lee*White, for plaintiff in error.

*Hurt, Gaines, Baird, Peek & Peabody, W. Neal Baird, Joe E. Freeman, Jr.,*contra.

Felton, Chief Judge.

“One is bound to anticipate and provide against what usually happens and what is likely to happen; *but it would impose too heavy u responsibility*to hold him bound in like manner to guard against what is unusual and unlikely to happen, or what, as it is sometimes said, is only remotely and slightly probable.” *Yarbrough v. Cantex Mfg. Co.,*97 Ga. App. 438, 440 (103 S. E. 2d 138) and cit. “The general test in such cases is not whether the injurious result or consequence was possible, but whether it was probable; that is, likely to occur according to the usual experience of persons.” *Whitaker v. Jones, McDougald, Smith, Pew Co.,*69 Ga. App. 711, 716 (26 S. E. 2d 545).

If the conduct of third persons or customers is such as to cause any reasonable apprehension of danger to other customers or invitees because of such conduct, it is the duty of the proprietor to interfere to prevent probable injury; and a failure so to interfere, and consequent damage, will subject such' proprietor to an action for damages for such negligent failure to prevent the injury. This duty of interference on the proprietor’s part does not begin until the danger is apparent, or the circumstances are such as would put an ordinarily prudent man on notice of the probability of danger. *Great A. & P. Tea Co. v. Cox,*51 Ga. App. 880 (2, 3) (181 S. E. 788).

The petition showed that while the plaintiff was leaving the defendant’s dime store the swinging door thereto “was violently and forcibly thrown open inwardly toward and against petitioner, violently and with great force, throwing and knocking and hurling petitioner” down a nearby stairway. Under the circumstances alleged in the petition, the violent and forcible opening of the door so as to hurl the plaintiff down the stairway was the sole proximate cause of her injuries. No facts are al*206leged which show that such danger was apparent or reasonably anticipatable. Since the petition shows on its face that the negligence of the defendant, if any, was not the proximate cause of the plaintiff’s injuries, and since no circumstances are alleged which create a duty on the part of the defendant to interfere so as to prevent probable injury from the conduct of another customer, the court did not err in sustaining the general demurrer and dismissing the petition.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Nichols and Bell, JJ., concur.*
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 36 (Wednesday, February 24, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 8325]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3632]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER10-730-000]


Wheelabrator Portsmouth, Inc.; Supplemental Notice That Initial 
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

February 18, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Wheelabrator Portsmouth, Inc.'s application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC, 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is March 9, 2010.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC, 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance 
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a8eeedfaebe7c6c4c1c6cdfbddd8d8c7dadce8cecddacb86cfc7de"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9adcdfc8d9d5f4f6f3f4ffc9efeaeaf5e8eedafcffe8f9b4fdf5ec">[email protected]</span></a>. 
or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-3632 Filed 2-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
(logo)LSI
                                                                 FINANCIAL GROUP



As of and for the year ended December 31, 1996, LSI Financial Group has complied
in all material respects with the minimum  servicing  standards set forth in the
Mortgage Bankers Association of America's UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM FOR
MORTGAGE  BANKERS.  As of and for this same  year,  LSI  Financial  Group had in
effect a  fidelity  bond and  errors  and  omissions  policy  in the  amount  of
$5,000,000,



/s/Bob Whisnant
Bob Whisnant, V.P, of Finance

8-1-97
Date



                                                            17500 Chenal Parkway
                                                                       Suite 200
                                                Little Rock, Arkansas 72211-9131
Exhibit 23.1


The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Viatel, Inc.:

                  We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the registration
statement  No.  333-15155  on Form  S-8 and in the  registration  statement  No.
333-16671  on Form S-8 of Viatel,  Inc. of our report  dated  February 26, 1999,
relating to the consolidated  balance sheets of Viatel, Inc. and subsidiaries as
of  December  31,  1998 and  1997 and the  related  consolidated  statements  of
operations, comprehensive loss, stockholders' equity (deficiency) and cash flows
for each of the years in the three-year  period ended December 31, 1998, and the
related  schedule,  which appears in the December 31, 1998 annual report on Form
10-K of Viatel, Inc.



                                                       /s/ KPMG LLP

New York, New York
March 30, 1999
----

----

**            DOR      BIOPHARMA,      INC.**

| November                14, 2007 | by:    | **/s/                Christopher J. Schaber**        |
|----------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                             |   | Christopher                J. Schaber, Ph.D.         |
|                             |   | President                and Chief Executive Officer |
|                             |   | (Principal                Executive Officer)         |
|                             |   |                                                 |
Exhibit 32



                        President's Written Certification
                             Of Financial Statements
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Statute 1350



     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Statute 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity
as president of 4net Software, Inc. (the "Company") that

     (a)  the Amended Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the
          period ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of
          Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     (b)  the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end
          of such period and the results of operations of the Company for such
          period.



Dated: August 5, 2005



                                            /s/ Steven N. Bronson
                                            ----------------------------------
                                            Steven N. Bronson, President
# CERTIFICATION

 

Re:          **Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2013-C9, CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2013-C9**(the “Transaction”),issued pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 1, 2013 (the“Pooling and Servicing Agreement”), executed in connection with theTransaction (capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meaningsset forth in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement).

 

 

               I, George Kok, certify that:

 

               1.             Ihave reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required tobe filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of MorganStanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2013-C9 (the “Exchange Actperiodic reports”);

 

               2.            Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 

 

               3.            Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other informationrequired to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this reportis included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

 

               4.            Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in thisreport under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in theExchange Act periodic reports, the servicer(s) have fulfilled their obligationsunder the servicing agreement(s) in all material respects; and

 

               5.             Allof the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to beincluded in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB andExchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to thisreport, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any materialinstances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in thisreport on Form 10-K.  

 

               In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on informationprovided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

 

·        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asTrustee

·        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCertificate Administrator

·        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCustodian

·        Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNCBank, National Association, as Master Servicer

·        Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNCBank, National Association, as Special Servicer (from 1/1/18 to 7/26/18) 

·        LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer(from 7/27/18 to 12/31/18)

·        Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., asOperating Advisor

 

 

Date:  March 29, 2019

 

 

By /s/ George Kok

Name: George Kok

Title: President
P. 1 

# OAR Box 1865 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# 24 ) IV-E-1 2 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 12/3/20089:15:27

AM Sheet 24 of 105P. 2 

# A-83-2 7 IV-E-1 2 CONTAC TREPOR T Dat e 

# T/ W *5,iWl CONTAC TBY : TELEPHON E 

# x ______ Originato r MEETIN G D Othe r 

# oterr/ NAME , TITL E & ORGANIZATIO N ^ Q l j \fi] H , rr)/v/ c^ ADDRES S & TELEPHON E NUMBE R 3 Gtfe^A V #>!>/ • 7/3-^0-3^ 0 fkiST©* , "H-M S 770<yc J ~03? S PURPOS E O R SUBJEC

T(Giv e projec t numbe ri fappropriate) SUMMAR Y /.o a VA/H/rnvqrD/v j w/K S /W?«L- f 7 0 c;,v t qewau ciNPia^TioK. A £ 0 o - rHD' S . l^ectoCc , T>G£ S /vjo roct/v/i f / » faoceji r o T)£-Sou-o/L, K^ J A C 6lt . ^ AV^/C/WSc t ^occ'JJc-J - frrZ, H^S M ^ A^- c5//^<cr K; M/^QSPif€r7.,c oa. VACUWV W ,2FJ"/Z>U<J ^ i s .

£ t Ooirt.es > /1N 3 77^- e ' X AMode /l^,^ De^irt70/ J ^

<n-K

<L/iTA^

sr T O 0 - 3 7 o • ACTIO N C D Distribution :
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0211

IN THE MATTER OF:

A.D.,

Respondent and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including May 13, 2020, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 6 2020

04/06/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0211