alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 37 (Thursday, February 25, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 8760]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3770]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC 
20549-0213.

Extension:
    Schedule 14D-9F; OMB Control No. 3235-0382; SEC File No. 270-
339.

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management 
and Budget this request for extension of the previously approved 
collection of information discussed below.
    Schedule 14D-9F is used (17 CFR 240.14d-103) by any foreign private 
issuer incorporated or organized under the laws of Canada or any 
Canadian province or territory or by any director or officer of such 
issuer, where the issuer is the subject of a cash tender or exchange 
offer for a class of securities filed on Schedule 14D-1F. The 
information required to be filed with the Commission is intended to 
permit verification of compliance with the securities law requirements 
and assures the public availability of such information. The 
information provided is mandatory and all information is made available 
to the public upon request. Schedule 14D-9F takes approximately 2 hours 
per response to prepare and is filed by approximately 6 respondents 
annually for a total reporting burden of 12 hours.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid control number.
    Written comments regarding the above information should be directed 
to the following persons: (i) Desk Officer for the Securities and 
Exchange Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, 
Office of Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503 or send an e-mail to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#56053e37312330223709173e3b333216393b347833392678313920"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="396a51585e4c5f4d58667851545c5d7956545b175c5649175e564f">[email protected]</span></a>.; and (ii) Charles Boucher, Director/CIO, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, c/o Shirley Martinson, 6432 General Green Way, 
Alexandria, Virginia 22312; or send an e-mail to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a9f9fbe8f6e4c8c0c5cbc6d1e9daccca87cec6df"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0c5c5e4d53416d65606e63744c7f696f226b637a">[email protected]</span></a>. 
Comments must be submitted to OMB within 30 days of this notice.

    Dated: February 18, 2010.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-3770 Filed 2-24-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**EXHIBIT 3.1.1** Amendment to Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company





**CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT**


**OF**


**CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION**


**OF**


**SOUTHWALL TECHNOLOGIES INC.**





IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED THAT:





1.  The name of the corporation is Southwall Technologies Inc. (the Corporation).





2.  The address of the Corporations registered office in the State of Delaware is [ 1013 Centre Road, City of Wilmington, County of New Castle ], and the name of the Corporations registered agent at such address is [ Corporation Service Company ].





3.  The Certificate of Incorporation is hereby amended by changing ARTICLE FOURTH thereof to read as follows:




FOURTH :  This Corporation is authorized to issue two classes of shares to be designated respectively Preferred Shares (Preferred) and Common Shares (Common). The Preferred shall have a par value of $.001 per share and the Common shall have a par value of $.001 per share. The total number of Preferred this Corporation shall have authority to issue is Five Million (5,000,000) and the total number of shares of Common this Corporation shall have authority to issue is Fifty Million (50,000,000).





A .  Definition .





For purposes of this Certificate Board of Directors shall mean the Board of Directors of this Corporation.





B .  Preferred Shares .





The Preferred may be issued from time to time in one or more series. The Board of Directors is authorized to determine or alter the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions to be granted or imposed upon any series of Preferred, to divide the authorized but undesignated shares of Preferred into such number of series as it may determine and to fix the number of shares constituting any such series and the designation thereof, or any of them. Within the limits and restrictions, if any, stated in any resolution of the Board of Directors originally fixing the number of shares constituting any series, the Board of Directors is authorized to increase or decrease (but not below the number of shares of such series then outstanding) the number of shares of such series. If the number of shares of any series shall be so decreased, the shares constituting such decrease shall resume the status which they had prior to the adoption of the resolutions originally fixing the number of shares of such series.





4.  The foregoing amendment has been duly adopted in accordance with the applicable provisions of Sections 211 and 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the foregoing Certificate of Amendment has been signed and attested as of October 5, 2004.





SOUTHWALL TECHNOLOGIES INC.











By: ________________________________


Thomas G. Hood, *President*





ATTEST:











____________________________________


Maury Austin, *Secretary*
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-16-0000673

23-MAY-2018

10:49 AM
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.3

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
   
We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" and 
"Selected Financial Data" and to the use of our report dated  December 3, 1997,
except for paragraph 3 of Note 6 and paragraph 10 of Note 10,  as to which the
date is January 2, 1998, Note 15, as to which the date is December 10, 1998,
and paragraph 13 of Note 10 as to which the date is __________ __, 1999, 
included in Amendment No. 3 to the  Registration Statement (Form S-1 No.
333-58819) and related Prospectus of  Intracel Corporation for the registration
of shares of its common stock.

Seattle, Washington
January 21, 1999

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The foregoing consent is in the form that will be signed upon the completion of
the reverse stock split described in paragraph 13 of Note 10 to the financial 
statements.
                                     
                                                 ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Seattle, Washington
January 21, 1999
### Streamflow in the upper Santa Cruz River basin, Santa Cruz and Pima Counties, Arizona

By: Alberto Condes de la Torre

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1939A

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf) 
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Streamflow and flood characteristics, Pima County, Arizona (a progress report)(1967)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
EXHIBIT
32.1









CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(Subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code)







Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of National Datacomputer, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 (the “Form
10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in
the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.












Dated:      
August 13,
2008                                                                                 /s/  WilliamBerens


William
B. Berens


President
and  Chief Executive Officer









Dated:      
August 13,
2008                                                                                 /s/ Bruna
Bucacci


Bruna
Bucacci


Chief
Accounting Officer











A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
###### Editorial Note on Part 181

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 181 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996, and 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001.

#### § 181.34 Sodium nitrite and potassium nitrite.

Sodium nitrite and potassium nitrite are subject to prior sanctions issued by the U.S. Department of Agriculture for use as color fixatives and preservative agents, with or without sodium or potassium nitrate, in the curing of red meat and poultry products.

[48 FR 1705, Jan. 14, 1983]
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 135 (Friday, July 13, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 41473]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-17179]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7953]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Lion Attacking a Horse''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the object entitled 
``Lion Attacking a Horse,'' to be imported by The J. Paul Getty Museum 
from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, is of 
cultural significance. The object is imported pursuant to a loan 
agreement with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit object at The J. Paul Getty 
Museum in Los Angeles, California from on or about August 10, 2012 to 
on or about February 4, 2013; and possible additional exhibitions or 
venues yet to be determined; is in the national interest. I have 
ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
listing of the exhibit object, contact Ona M. Hahs, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6473). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: June 29, 2012.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-17179 Filed 7-12-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
<PAGE>   1


                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                             [MOSS ADAMS LETTERHEAD]



                   CONSENT AND REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED
                                PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT

We hereby consent to the use in amendment number two to this Registration
Statement of our report dated January 7, except for Note 19, as to which the
date is September 25, 1997, relating to the consolidated financial statements 
of VRB Bancorp and subsidiary, and our report dated September 25, 1997,
relating to the financial statements of Colonial Banking Company and to the 
reference to our Firm under the caption "Experts" in the Prospectus.



/s/ Moss Adams LLP

Portland, Oregon
November 3, 1997
1

Nudd, Gregory

From: Bob Downing - AQDX [BDowning@mail.maricopa.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 6:28 PM

To: Nudd, Gregory

Cc: paris.bryan@azdeq.gov; Phil B. Denee; Corky Martinkovic - AQDX; Eric Raisanen - AQDX; 

Dena Konopka - AQDX

Subject: RE: 2008 non-point EI question

Attachments: EPA-G.Nudd Maricopa-county-EI-question.xlsx

Hi Greg: re: your recent inquiry on 2008 PEI calculations for fuel oil combustion: 

The anomaly in the Maricopa Co. values (compared with statewide estimates) for the fuel oil combustion categories 

derive from the different approaches used to estimate emissions. The Maricopa Co. 2008 PEI values for these source 

categories were estimated using a top-down (supply-based) method, which is described in detail – including citations for 

the EIIP documents used -- in our published report. A pdf version of the area-source chapter of our 2008 PM10 PEI 

report is available here). For the industrial sector, see Section 3.2.2 (beginning on p. 4 of the PDF file [a.k.a. p. 22 of the 

report]), and Section 3.2.4 (p. 7 of the PDF) for commercial/institutional use. 

A comparison of this approach vs. the EPA and AZ state-level emissions estimates show fairly good agreement when 

comparing the emission factors used; the large difference in emissions results primarily from the estimated throughput 

(i.e. fuel consumed). Our top-down approach based on EIA fuel supply data presumes usage of approx. 84,136 Mgals, 

vs. Pechan’s same estimates for this period are approx. 12,174 Mgals. (See sheet “EFs” of the attached file.) 

In preparing the 2011 PEI, we’ve devoted a considerable amount of time to reviewing the work that EPA (through E.H. 

Pechan) have done to develop county-level emissions estimates, and in fact have adopted EPA’s (significantly lower) 

estimates for this source category into our 2011 NEI submittal. I’ve added this data to the spreadsheet you provided 

with your summary analysis. (See Sheet 1 of the attached file.) 

I appreciate your thoughtful examination of our past work, and hope this helps illuminate the source of the differences 

in the data you’ve been reviewing. 

regards, 

Bob 

From: Nudd, Gregory [mailto:Nudd.Gregory@epa.gov] 

Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 2:19 PM 

To: Bob Downing - AQDX 

Cc: paris.bryan@azdeq.gov; Phil B. Denee 

Subject: 2008 non-point EI question 

Hi Bob, 

I’m digging into the 2008 NEI for area sources in Arizona and I’ve come up with some head scratching results. I was 

wondering if you could do a sanity check on the numbers in the attached spreadsheet. It looks like the NOx numbers are 

off by an order of magnitude. 

Thanks, 

Greg Nudd 

Environmental Engineer 

Air Planning Office 

USEPA Region 9
Editorial Note on Part 172
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 172 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; 70 FR 72074, Dec. 1, 2005; and 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 172.814 Hydroxylated lecithin. The food additive hydroxylated lecithin may be safely used as an emulsifier in foods in accordance with the following conditions: ( a ) The additive is obtained by the treatment of lecithin in one of the following ways, under controlled conditions whereby the separated fatty acid fraction of the resultant product has an acetyl value of 30 to 38: ( 1 ) With hydrogen peroxide, benzoyl peroxide, lactic acid, and sodium hydroxide.
( 2 ) With hydrogen peroxide, acetic acid, and sodium hydroxide.
( b ) It is used or intended for use, in accordance with good manufacturing practice, as an emulsifier in foods, except for those standardized foods that do not provide for such use.
( c ) To assure safe use of the additive, the label of the food additive container shall bear, in addition to the other information required by the Act: ( 1 ) The name of the additive, “hydroxylated lecithin”.
( 2 ) Adequate directions for its use.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7259 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7259

      To provide for expedited removal of certain illegal aliens.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 6, 2024

    Mr. Ogles (for himself, Mr. Clyde, Mr. Duncan, and Mr. Moore of 
   Alabama) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To provide for expedited removal of certain illegal aliens.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Sending Evading Non-Documented 
Threats Home Especially Migrants Biden Accepted Carelessly and 
Knowingly Act of 2024'' or the ``SEND THEM BACK Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. EXPEDITED REMOVAL OF CERTAIN ILLEGAL ALIENS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, an 
alien who entered the United States illegally on or since January 20, 
2021, shall be subject to expedited removal, even if such alien 
indicated an intention to apply for asylum or a fear of persecution.
    (b) Exception.--Subsection (a) shall not apply to any alien who is 
currently a member of the Armed Forces of the United States as of 
January 1, 2024.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.28





February 25, 1998



Walter C. Babcock
President
Bend Research, Inc.
64550 Research Road
Bend, OR   97701

Re:  Reduced R&D Programs obligation under the License Agreement (the
     "Agreement") dated November 1, 1993 between Consep, Inc. ("Consep") and
     Bend Research, Inc. ("Bend") for the calendar year 1998.

Dear Chris:

        Pursuant to Paragraph 4.2 of the Agreement, this letter is to confirm
our mutual agreement regarding Consep's R&D Program obligation, as set forth in
Paragraph 4.1 of the Agreement. Bend agrees with Consep that a reduction in that
obligation is needed to maximize the value of our investment. The R&D Program
obligation is, therefore, reduced to no minimum requirement for the calendar
year 1998. Also, during 1998 there is no required portion of the R&D Program
obligation that must be spent on biorational products. Except as set forth
above, the rights of the parties under the Agreement shall remain unchanged.

        This reduction in Consep's R&D Program obligation does not constitute
any intent to reduce that obligation in any subsequent calendar year or to
reduce any other Consep obligation during 1998 or any subsequent calendar year.

        If the above accurately reflects your understanding of our mutual
agreement, please sign and date the enclosed copy of this letter and return it
to me.

Best regards,

/s/  Volker G. Oakey
-------------------------
Volker G. Oakey
President

Accepted and agreed to:

BEND RESEARCH, INC.

By: /s/ Walter C. Babcock                       Date: February 26, 1998
    -------------------------
        Walter C. Babcock
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7187 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7187

    To modify eligibility requirements for amateur sports governing 
                             organizations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 1, 2024

Mr. Steube (for himself, Ms. Hageman, Mr. Timmons, Mr. Biggs, Mr. Weber 
    of Texas, Ms. Boebert, Mr. Gosar, Mr. Duncan, Mr. LaMalfa, Mrs. 
 Houchin, Mr. Babin, Mr. Dunn of Florida, Mr. Clyde, Mr. Tony Gonzales 
    of Texas, Ms. Tenney, Mr. Kustoff, and Mr. Bost) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To modify eligibility requirements for amateur sports governing 
                             organizations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protection of Women in Olympic and 
Amateur Sports Act''.

SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS.

    (a) Definition.--Section 220501(b) of title 36, United States Code, 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(13) `female' means an individual who has, had, will 
        have--or would have, but for a developmental or genetic anomaly 
        or historical accident--the reproductive system that at some 
        point produces, transports, and utilizes eggs for 
        fertilization.
            ``(14) `male' means an individual who has, had, will have--
        or would have, but for a developmental or genetic anomaly or 
        historical accident--the reproductive system that at some point 
        produces, transports, and utilizes sperm for fertilization.
            ``(15) `sex' means an individual's biological sex, either 
        male or female.''.
    (b) Eligibility.--Section 220522 of title 36, United States Code, 
is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (18), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (19), by striking the period and inserting 
        ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(20) prohibits a person whose sex is male from 
        participating in an amateur athletic competition that is 
        designated for females, women, or girls.''.
                                 <all>
```