alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 184
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 184 appear at 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; and 81 FR 49897, July 29, 2016.

§ 184.1530 Niacin. ( a ) Niacin (C6H5NO2, CAS Reg. No. 59-67-6) is the chemical 3-pyridinecarboxylic acid (nicotinic acid). It is a non-hygroscopic, stable, white, crystalline solid that sublimes without decomposition at about 230 °C. It is soluble in water and alcohol. It is insoluble in ether.
( b ) The ingredient meets the specifications of the “Food Chemicals Codex,” 4th ed. (1996), p. 264, which is incorporated by reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies are available from the National Academy Press, Box 285, 2101 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20055 (Internet address *http://www.nap.edu*), or may be examined at the Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852, 240-402-7500, between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .*
( c ) In accordance with § 184.1(b)(1), the ingredient is used in food with no limitation other than current good manufacturing practice. The affirmation of this ingredient as generally recognized as safe (GRAS) as direct human food ingredient is based upon the following current good manufacturing practice conditions of use: ( 1 ) The ingredient is used as a nutrient supplement as defined in § 170.3(o)(20) of this chapter.
( 2 ) The ingredient is used in foods at levels not to exceed current good manufacturing practice. The ingredient may also be used in infant formula in accordance with section 412(g) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) or with regulations promulgated under section 412(a)(2) of the Act.
( d ) Prior sanctions for this ingredient different from the uses established in this section do not exist or have been waived.
[48 FR 52033, Nov. 16, 1983; 48 FR 54336, Dec. 2, 1983, as amended at 64 FR 1760, Jan. 12, 1999; 81 FR 5596, Feb. 3, 2016; 88 FR 17724, Mar. 24, 2023]
### Electric-analog studies of Brine coning beneath freshwater wells in the Punjab region, West Pakistan

By: Gordon D. BennettM.J. MundorffS. Amjad Hussain

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1608J

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Editorial Note on Part 184
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 184 appear at 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; and 81 FR 49897, July 29, 2016.

§ 184.1090 Stearic acid. ( a ) Stearic acid (C18H36O2, CAS Reg. No. 57-11-4) is a white to yellowish white solid. It occurs naturally as a glyceride in tallow and other animal or vegetable fats and oils and is a principal constituent of most commercially hydrogenated fats. It is produced commercially from hydrolyzed tallow derived from edible sources or from hydrolyzed, completely hydrogenated vegetable oil derived from edible sources.
( b ) The ingredient meets the specifications of the Food Chemicals Codex, 3d Ed. (1981), p. 313, which is incorporated by reference, and the requirements of § 172.860(b)(2) of this chapter. Copies of the Food Chemicals Codex are available from the National Academy Press, 2101 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20418, or available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .*
( c ) In accordance with § 184.1(b)(1), the ingredient is used in food with no limitation other than current good manufacturing practice. The affirmation of this ingredient as generally recognized as safe (GRAS) as a direct human food ingredient is based upon the following current good manufacturing practice conditions of use: ( 1 ) The ingredient is used as a flavoring agent and adjuvant as defined in § 170.3(o)(12) of this chapter.
( 2 ) The ingredient is used in foods at levels not to exceed current good manufacturing practice.
( d ) Prior sanctions for this ingredient different from the uses established in this section do not exist or have been waived.
[48 FR 52445, Nov. 18, 1983, as amended at 50 FR 49536, Dec. 3, 1985; 69 FR 24512, May 4, 2004]
[Nos. 38458-9-I; 38228-4-I.

Division One.

November 3, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Kurt A. Vanhalteren, *Appellant.*

Appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 95-1-06562-3, George T. Mattson, J., entered March 7, 1996. *Affirmed in part*and *remanded*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
###### Editorial Note on Part 177

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 177 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 70 FR 72074, Dec. 1, 2005; and 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

#### § 177.1460 Melamine-formaldehyde resins in molded articles.

Melamine-formaldehyde resins may be safely used as the food-contact surface of molded articles intended for use in producing, manufacturing, packing, processing, preparing, treating, packaging, transporting, or holding food in accordance with the following prescribed conditions:

(a) For the purpose of this section, melamine-formaldehyde resins are those produced when 1 mole of melamine is made to react with not more than 3 moles of formaldehyde in water solution.

(b) The resins may be mixed with refined woodpulp and the mixture may contain other optional adjuvant substances which may include the following:

| List of substances | Limitations |
| --- | --- |
| Colorants used in accordance with § 178.3297 of this chapter | |
| Hexamethylenetetramine | For use only as polymerization reaction control agent. |
| Phthalic acid anhydride | Do. |
| Zinc stearate | For use as lubricant. |

(c) The molded melamine-formaldehyde articles in the finished form in which they are to contact food, when extracted with the solvent or solvents characterizing the type of food and under the conditions of time and temperature as determined from tables 1 and 2 of § 175.300(d) of this chapter, shall yield net chloroform-soluble extractives not to exceed 0.5 milligram per square inch of food-contact surface.

[42 FR 14572, Mar. 15, 1977, as amended at 56 FR 42933, Aug. 30, 1991; 87 FR 31089, May 20, 2022]
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1



               Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8) pertaining to the Wall Data Incorporated 1993 Stock Option Plan as Amended
and Restated on October 15, 1996 and the Wall Data Incorporated 1994 Nonofficer
Stock Option Plan as Amended and Restated on October 15, 1996 of our report
dated January 19, 1998, except for Note 14, as to which the date is March 12,
1998, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Wall
Data Incorporated included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 1997 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


Seattle, Washington                                            ERNST & YOUNG LLP
March 24, 1998
```

[Federal Register: July 26, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 142)]
[Notices]               
[Page 43491]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr26jy10-29]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

 
Sunshine Act Meetings

Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement: Vol. 75, No. 137, 
Monday July 19, 2010, page 41820.

Announced Time and Date of Meeting: 10 a.m.-10:30 a.m., Wednesday July 
21, 2010.

Changes to Meeting: Meeting postponed.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Contact Person for Additional 
Information: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the Secretary, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814 (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: July 21, 2010.
    .
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-18358 Filed 7-22-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

I, John G. Robertson, Chief Executive Officer of IAS Communications, Inc. certify
  that:

|1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of IAS
      Communications, Inc.;                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|2. | Based on my knowledge, this annual report
        does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
        a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
        circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
        respect to the period covered by this annual report; and
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial
        statements, and other financial information included in this annual report,
        fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results
        of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
        presented in this annual report.                       

| | IAS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
| | ----------------------
| |                       
| | By:                   
| |                       
| |                       
| |                       

Date: October 16, 2003

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Navy

# AGENCY:

Department of Navy, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Department of the Navy published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         (75 FR 4537) of January 28, 2010, concerning public hearings on a Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Silver Strand Training Complex, San Diego, CA. The document contained incorrect dates.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southwest, Attention: Mr. Kent Randall, SSTC EIS Project Manager, 1220 Pacific Highway, Building 1, 5th Floor, San Diego, CA, 92132; or                         *http://www.silverstrandtrainingcomplexeis.com.*

## Correction

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         (75 FR 4537) of January 28, 2010, on page 4537, in the third column, correct                         *Dates and Addresses*                         caption to read:                    
      ( print page 7571)    
*Dates and Addresses:*                             Two public hearings will be held in San Diego County, CA to receive oral and written comments on the DEIS. All meetings will start with an open house session from 4 p.m. to 6 p.m., followed by a presentation and formal public comment period from 6 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. Public hearings will be held on the following dates and at the following locations:                        

1. Tuesday, February 23, 2010, at the Imperial Beach City Hall Community Room, 825 Imperial Beach Boulevard, Imperial Beach, CA; and

2. Wednesday, February 24, 2010, at the Coronado Community Center, Nautilus Banquet Room, 1845 Strand Way, Coronado, CA.

Dated: February 5, 2010.

A.M. Vallandingam

Lieutenant Commander, Office of the Judge Advocate General, U.S. Navy, Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2010-3376 Filed 2-19-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 22-0640

IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF:

SALLY JO HUFFARD,

 Petitioner and Appellee,

 and

GREGORY ALAN HUFFARD,

 Respondent and Appellant.

ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT

This appeal being subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parties having failed to jointly 

and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c),

IT IS ORDERED THAT Kevin T. Sweeney, whose name appears next on the list 

of attorneys desiring appointment as mediators for Domestic Relations appeals which is 

maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appointed to conduct the 

mediation process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time periods set forth in M.R.App.P., 

7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appointment.

A true copy of this order is being mailed to counsel of record for the parties, or to 

the parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof.

DATED this December 9, 2022.

Bowen Greenwood, Clerk of the Supreme Court

c: Gregory Alan Huffard, grealhuff54@gmail.com

Matthew B. Gallinger, mgallinger@tolliverlaw.com

Kevin T. Sweeney, kevintsweeney@hotmail.com

12/09/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0640
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17A0394. PAUL MURRAY v. THE STATE.

In 2006, Paul Murray pled guilty to three counts of child molestation, for which

he wassentenced to twenty yearsto serve in prison. Since that time, Murray hasfiled

numerous motions with the trial court and multiple appeals with this Court, all of

which were dismissed. See Case Nos. A11A0456, A14A0568, and A15D0029. 

Murray now seeks a direct appeal from the trial court’s July 18, 2014 order

dismissing his “Motion to Set Aside Sentence,” through a notice of appeal filed on

September 15, 2014.1 We, however, lack jurisdiction.

To be timely, a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry of the

order on appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). The proper and timely filing of a notice

of appeal is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction on this Court. Rowland v.

State, 264 Ga. 872, 872 (1) (452 SE2d 756) (1995). Because Murray filed his notice

of appeal 59 days after entry of the order he seeks to appeal, it is untimely. 

Accordingly, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. 

1

In Case No. A15D0029, Murray sought discretionary review of the same trial

court order. His application was dismissed as untimely on September 22, 2014.

October 13, 2016
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

10/13/2016
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1095 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1095

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend chapter 113 of title 18, United States Code, to clarify the 
  prohibition on the trafficking in goods or services, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRAFFICKING DEFINED.

    (a) Counterfeit Goods or Services.--Section 2320(e) of title 18, 
United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following:
            ``(2) the term `traffic' means to transport, transfer, or 
        otherwise dispose of, to another, for purposes of commercial 
        advantage or private financial gain, or to make, import, 
        export, obtain control of, or possess, with intent to so 
        transport, transfer, or otherwise dispose of;''; and
            (2) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4) and 
        inserting the following:
            ``(3) the term `financial gain' includes the receipt, or 
        expected receipt, of anything of value; and''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Sound recordings and music videos of live musical 
        performances.--Section 2319A(e) of title 18, United States 
        Code, is amended by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the 
        following:
            ``(2) the term `traffic' has the same meaning as in section 
        2320(e) of this title.''.
            (2) Counterfeit labels for phonorecords, computer programs, 
        etc.--Section 2318(b) of title 18, United States Code, is 
        amended by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following:
            ``(2) the term `traffic' has the same meaning as in section 
        2320(e) of this title;''.
            (3) Anti-bootlegging.--Section 1101 of title 17, United 
        States Code, is amended by striking subsection (b) and 
        inserting the following:
    ``(b) Definition.--As used in this section, the term `traffic' has 
the same meaning as in section 2320(e) of title 18, United States 
Code.''.

            Passed the Senate November 10, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1095

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend chapter 113 of title 18, United States Code, to clarify the 
  prohibition on the trafficking in goods or services, and for other 
                               purposes.
```
[No. 38966-1-I.

Division One.

October 27, 1997.]

#### Berschauer/Phillips Construction Co., *Appellant,*v. Seattle School District No. 1, et al., *Defendants,*Harry Lee Cummings, et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 91-2-00490-1, Robert S. Lasnik, J., entered June 11, 1996. *Affirmed in part*and *reversed in part*by unpublished opinion per Agid, J., concurred in by Cox and Ellington, JJ.
[No. 38927-1-I.

Division One.

December 22, 1997.]

#### John M. Wascisin, et al., *Appellants,*v. Steven Olsen, et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Ska-git County, No. 95-2-00996-7, George E. McIntosh, J., entered June 17, 1996. *Affirmed in part and reversed in part*by unpublished per curiam opinion. Now published at 90 Wn. App. 440.
[No. 16105-6-III.

Division Three.

December 30, 1997.]

#### Solutec Corporation, Inc., *Respondent,*v. Steve Agnew, et al., *Appellants.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Yakima County, No. 95-2-00234-9, Heather K. Van Nuys, J., entered September 24, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Kato, J., concurred in by Kurtz and Brown, JJ.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21A1227. DOLLY THOMAS VETTUKALLEL v. ROY AUGUSTIAN.

Roy Augustian filed a complaint for divorce against Dolly Thomas Vettukallel

(“the Wife”). According to the complaint, there were no children between the parties,

and thus, child custody was not at issue in the case. On January 22, 2021, the trial

court entered a final judgment and divorce decree. On February 22, 2021, the Wife

filed this direct appeal. We lack jurisdiction.

Where, as here, the underlying action involves rights and obligations arising

out of a divorce decree and does not involve child custody, an appeal must be pursued

by discretionary application. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2), (b); Voyles v. Voyles, 301

Ga. 44, 47 (799 SE2d 160) (2017). “Compliance with the discretionary appeals

procedure is jurisdictional.” Booker v. Ga. Dept. of Human Res., 317 Ga. App. 426,

427 (731 SE2d 110) (2012). The Wife’s failure to follow the proper procedure

deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal. As a result, this appeal is hereby

DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

April 19, 2021

04/19/2021