alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 31988R1865 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31988R1865

**Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1865/88 of 30 June 1988 suspending customs duties in trade in beef and veal between Spain and the Community as constituted at 31 December 1985 **

*
Official Journal L 166 , 01/07/1988 P. 0026 - 0026 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 26 P. 0234 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 26 P. 0234 *

*****

COMMISSION REGULATION (EEC) No 1865/88

of 30 June 1988

suspending customs duties in trade in beef and veal between Spain and the Community as constituted at 31 December 1985

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to the Act of Accession of Spain and Portugal, and in particular Article 75 (4) thereof,

Whereas Council Regulation (EEC) No 3861/87 of 22 December 1987 suspending customs duties in trade in beef and veal between Spain and the Community as constituted at 31 December 1985 (1) provides for the partial suspension of customs duties in trade between Spain and the Community as constituted at 31 December 1985 until 30 June 1988; whereas that Regulation also provides that before that date the Commission is to review the situation on the Spanish and Community market with a view possibly to adopting suitable measures;

Whereas recent developments in production and on the Spanish and Community market for beef and veal products make full liberalization of trade in this sector desirable;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Beef and Veal,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The customs duties pursuant to Article 75 (1) of the Act of Accession and applicable to trade in the products covered by Regulation (EEC) No 805/68 between Spain and the Community as constituted at 31 December 1985 shall be suspended from 1 July 1988.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 July 1988.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 June 1988.

For the Commission

Frans ANDRIESSEN

Vice-President

(1) OJ No L 363, 23. 12. 1987, p. 32.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.02


                   CONSENT OF KPMG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of Directors
Ribi ImmunoChem Research, Inc.


We consent to the use of our report and to the reference to our firm under the
heading "Experts" included herein.

                                 KPMG LLP

Billings, Montana
August 11, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999             MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999             MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           8,480                  10,594
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,331                  10,597
<ALLOWANCES>                                       600                     588
<INVENTORY>                                     20,167                  17,103
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,995                  39,323
<PP&E>                                          27,493                  23,624
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,170                 (13,022)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  57,100                  54,340
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,586                  25,489
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                  28,256
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           120                      72
<OTHER-SE>                                      42,197                     669
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    57,100                  54,340
<SALES>                                         66,523                  56,856
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                66,523                  56,856
<CGS>                                          (44,939)                (38,048)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  (44,939)                (38,048)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (24,452)                (11,713)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (993)                   (431)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3,155)                 10,313
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (2,083)                 (4,229)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (5,238)                  6,084
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (5,238)                  6,084
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.56)                   0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.56)                   0.03


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32





Certification of Periodic Financial Report


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of AMCOL International Corporation (the “Company”) certifies that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the six months ended June 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  July 30, 2010
/s/ Lawrence E. WashowLawrence E. Washow

Chief Executive OfficerDate:  July 30, 2010
/s/ Donald W. PearsonDonald W. Pearson

Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**ROBERTO JIMENEZ,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 913 MAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 10th day of May, 2016, the Petition for Allow ance of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**

**Justice Donohue did not participate in the consideration or decision of this** 

**matter.**
§ 1.662 How will FDA monitor accredited third-party certification bodies? ( a ) FDA will periodically evaluate the performance of each accredited third-party certification body to determine whether the accredited third-party certification body continues to comply with the applicable requirements of this subpart and whether there are deficiencies in the performance of the accredited third-party certification body that, if not corrected, would warrant withdrawal of its accreditation under § 1.664. FDA will evaluate each directly accredited third-party certification body annually. For a third-party certification body accredited by a recognized accreditation body, FDA will evaluate an accredited third-party certification body not later than 3 years after the date of accreditation for a 4-year term of accreditation, or by no later than the mid-term point for accreditation granted for less than 4 years. FDA may conduct additional performance assessments of an accredited third-party certification body at any time.
( b ) In evaluating the performance of an accredited third-party certification body under paragraph (a) of this section, FDA may review any one or more of the following: ( 1 ) Regulatory audit reports and food and facility certifications;
( 2 ) The accredited third-party certification body's self-assessments under § 1.655;
( 3 ) Reports of assessments by a recognized accreditation body under § 1.621;
( 4 ) Documents and other information relevant to a determination of the accredited third-party certification body's compliance with the applicable requirements of this subpart; and
( 5 ) Information obtained by FDA, including during inspections, audits, onsite observations, or investigations, of one or more eligible entities to which a food or facility certification was issued by such accredited third-party certification body.
( c ) FDA may conduct its evaluation of an accredited third-party certification body through a site visit to an accredited third-party certification body's headquarters (or other location that manages audit agents conducting food safety audits under this subpart, if different than its headquarters), through onsite observation of an accredited third party certification body's performance during a food safety audit of an eligible entity, or through document review.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, I, David H. Thompson, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

1.     I have read this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of International
Absorbents, Inc.;

2.     To my knowledge, this report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

3.     To my knowledge, the information in this report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations as of
October 31, 2002.

|      |  |                  |                                          
|----- |  | ---------------- | -----------------------------------------
|Date: |  | December 9, 2002 |                                          
|      |  |                  |                                          
|      |  |                  | /s/ David H. Thompson                    
|      |  |                  |                                          
|      |  |                  | David H. Thompson
Chief Financial Officer

Unaudited (all amounts in U.S. dollars except where otherwise noted). The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
18
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 249 (Wednesday, December 29, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 81998-81999]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32807]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Notice of Performance Review Board Membership

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), the Department of the Navy 
(DON) announces the appointment of members to the DON's numerous Senior 
Executive Service (SES) Pay Pools (PP)/Performance Review Boards (PRB). 
The purpose of the PP/PRB is to provide fair and impartial review of 
the annual SES performance appraisal prepared by the senior executive's 
immediate and second level supervisor; to make recommendations to 
appointing officials regarding acceptance or modification of the 
performance rating; and to make recommendations for performance bonuses 
and basic pay increases. Composition of the specific PP/PRB will be 
determined on an ad hoc basis from among individuals listed below:

Adams, Patricia A. Ms.
Allard, Terry T. Dr.
Ardrey, Ellen Ms.
Bird, John M. VADM
Branch, Elliott B. Mr.
Brennan, Anne M. Ms.
Cali, Robert T. Mr.
Campbell, Joseph F. RADM
Chudoba, Phillip Mr.
Clark, Mark A. Mr.
Clookie, Mark D. Mr.
Commons, Gladys HON.
Cook, Charles E. III Mr.
Craig, Scott T. RADM
Easter, Steffanie B. Ms.
Eccles, Thomas J. RDML
Garcia, Juan M. HON.
Gibbs, Robert C. Mr.
Goodhart, John C. Mr.
Grosklags, Paul RDML
Harrell, Margaret R. Ms.
Hogue, Robert D. Mr.

[[Page 81999]]

Honecker, Mark W. Mr.
Iselin, Steven R. Mr.
Johnson, David C. RDML
Jones, Walter F. Dr.
Keeney, Carmela A. Ms.
Kistler, Michael R. Mr.
Kleintop, Maureen U. Ms.
Laux, Thomas E. Mr.
Lawrence, Joseph P. Dr.
Ledvina, Thomas N. Mr.
Leikach, Kalmen I. Mr.
Lewis, David H. RDML
Ligler, Frances S. Dr.
Maguire, Margaret M. Ms.
Marble, Douglas C. CAPT
McCormack, Donald F. Jr. Mr.
McCurdy, Jesse W. Jr. Mr.
McMahon, Michael E. RDML
McManamon, James P. RDML
McNair, John W. Mr.
Meadows, Linda J. Ms.
Mitchell, Stephen E. Mr.
Montgomery, John A. Dr.
Moran, William F. RADM
Murray, Sheryl E. Ms.
O'Neil, Scott M. Mr.
Orzalli, John C. RADM
Panter, Frank A. LTGEN
Persons, Brian J. Mr.
Pfannenstiel, Jackalyne HON.
Punderson, Jerome F. Mr.
Ridley, Mark D. Mr.
Roberson, Eileen S. Ms.
Shannon, James J. RDML
Shephard, Monica R. Ms.
Skinner, Walter M. VADM
Smith, Roderick F. Mr.
Somoroff, Allan R. Dr.
Stackley, Sean J. HON.
Stewart, Paul C. CAPT
Stiller, Allison F. Ms.
Tamburrino, Pasquale M. Mr.
Tesch, Thomas G. Mr.
Thackrah, John S. Mr.
Thomsen, James E. Mr.
Wears, Thomas G. RDML
Weddel, David W. Mr.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Danielle A. Fisher, Office of 
Civilian Human Resources, telephone 202-685-6341.

    Dated: December 22, 2010.
H.E. Higgins,
Lieutenant, Office of the Judge Advocate General, U.S. Navy, Federal 
Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-32807 Filed 12-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
§ 1312.44 Request for hearing or appearance; waiver. ( a ) Any applicant entitled to a hearing pursuant to § 1312.42 and who desires a hearing on the denial of his application for an import, export, or transshipment permit shall, within 30 days after the date of receipt of the denial of his application, file with the Administrator a written request for a hearing in the form prescribed in § 1316.47 of this chapter.
( b ) Any applicant entitled to a hearing pursuant to § 1312.42 may, within the period permitted for filing a request for a hearing, file with the Administrator a waiver of an opportunity for a hearing, together with a written statement regarding his position on the matters of fact and law involved in such hearing. Such statement, if admissible, shall be made a part of the record and shall be considered in light of the lack of opportunity for cross-examination in determining the weight to be attached to matters of fact asserted therein.
( c ) If any applicant entitled to a hearing pursuant to § 1312.42 fails to appear at the hearing, he shall be deemed to have waived his opportunity for the hearing unless he shows good cause for such failure.
( d ) If the applicant waives or is deemed to have waived this opportunity for the hearing, the Administrator may cancel the hearing, if scheduled, and issue his final order pursuant to § 1312.47 without a hearing.
[37 FR 15923, Aug. 8, 1972. Redesignated at 38 FR 26609, Sept. 24, 1973]
<PAGE>

21.    List of Subsidiaries of the Company

The following is a list of Integrated Measurement Systems, Inc. operating
subsidiaries. Integrated Measurement Systems, Inc. has no parent companies.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

            Subsidiary                                         Percent Owned
<S>                                                                <C>
Integrated Measurement Systems FSC, Inc.                           100%

Integrated Measurement Systems (Europe) AG                         100%

IMS Europe Ltd.                                                    100%

Integrated Measurement Systems (France) Sarl                       100%

Integrated Measurement Systems (Deutschland) GmbH                  100%

Integrated Measurement Systems (Japan) KK                          100%

Integrated Measurement Systems (M) Sdn. Bdn.                       100%

Integrated Measurement Systems (P) Inc.                            100%
</TABLE>


                                      F-33
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7710

PATRICK VINCENT TYLER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

GEORGE HINKLE, Warden, Greensville

Correctional Center; GENE JOHNSON, Director,

Virginia Department of Corrections; JERRY W.

KILGORE, Attorney General of the State of

Virginia,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior

District Judge. (3:06-cv-00007-RLW)

Submitted: February 15, 2007 Decided: February 22, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Patrick Vincent Tyler, II, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Patrick Vincent Tyler, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal

the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254

(2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Reid v. Angelone, 369

F.3d 363, 371 (4th Cir. 2004); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th

Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude

that Tyler has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
# C_2019387EN.01001801.xml

| 15.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 387/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 387/18

---

Corrigendum to Statement by the Commission with respect to Article 14(2) concerning the cooperation with the Union agencies

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 347 of 14 October 2019
  )

(2019/C 387/08)

On the cover page and on page 1, in the title:

for:

‘Statement by the Commission with respect to Article 14(2) concerning the cooperation with the Union agencies’,

read:

‘Statement by the Commission with respect to Article 14(2) of Regulation (EU) 2019/1700 of the European Parliament and of the Council, concerning the cooperation with the Union agencies’.

On page 1, first sentence:

for:

‘To ensure coherence and comparability of European social statistics, the Commission will reinforce cooperation with Union agencies in line with Article 14(2) and the related recitals (12 and 33).’,

read:

‘To ensure coherence and comparability of European social statistics, the Commission will reinforce cooperation with Union Agencies in line with Article 14(2) and the related recitals (12 and 33) of Regulation (EU) 2019/1700 of the European Parliament and of the Council (*).

---
Fenbutatin

- oxide Meeting on Registration Review Risk Assessments Held January 14, 2014
Participants: Office of Pesticides Programs (OPP), United Phosphorus Inc. (UPI), and Pyxis Consulting for UPI
January 14, 2014
On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 OPP registration review team members m et with UPI representatives to discuss the upcoming registration review preliminary risk assessments for fenbutatin

- oxide. The team discussed the registration review timeline, status of data requirements for fenbutatin

- oxi de, and proposed changes to help clarify fenbutatin oxide product labels.
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 249 (Wednesday, December 29, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 82129]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32889]

[[Page 82129]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7280]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Francis Al[yuml]s: A Story of Deception''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000, I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Francis Al[yuml]s,'' imported from abroad 
for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural 
significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with 
the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition 
or display of the exhibit objects at the Museum of Modern Art, New 
York, NY, from on or about May 8, 2011, until on or about August 1, 
2011, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be 
determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these 
Determinations is ordered to be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol B. Epstein, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202/632-6473). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-
5, L/PD, Fifth Floor, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: December 21, 2010.
Ann Stock,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-32889 Filed 12-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kenneth Williams, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered November 22, 1978, convicting him of *686attempted robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. An examination of the colloquy between the court and defendant clearly demonstrates that his plea of guilty, made with the advice of his counsel, was voluntarily and knowingly entered as a part of a plea bargaining agreement. The defendant has neither applied to vacate his plea at Criminal Term, nor, on appeal, made a factual showing that, in making his plea, his rights were impaired. No circumstances occurred at the time of the plea to lead the court to conclude that the defendant was not fully aware of the rights he. was then waiving or that he was not completely cognizant of the consequences of his plea of guilty. Therefore, there is no warrant for the further inquiry defendant now seeks. In *People v Francis*(38 NY2d 150, 154) the court held: "What is common to all of these examples is the fact that, in each case, something — whether it was defendant’s testimony, inconsistencies in the indictment, or counsel’s objections— called the courts’ attention to a problem which would not otherwise have been apparent. It does no violence to our concept of plea bargaining as a serious and difficult matter to hold that Judges are not expected to be omniscient. Indeed, as we pointed out in *People v Nixon*([21 NY2d 338,] *supra)*there is no requirement that the Judge conduct a *pro forma*inquisition in each case on the off-chance that a defendant who is adequately represented by counsel and who admits the underlying facts may nevertheless not know what he is doing. Something must trigger the inquiry.” Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Gibbons and Cohalan, JJ., concur.