alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 223 (Friday, November 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 70911]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29357]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

Agency Holding The Meetings: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
    The following notice of scheduled meetings is published pursuant to 
the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-
409, 5 U.S.C. 552b.

Times and Dates: The Commission has scheduled three meetings for the 
following dates:
    December 1 from 9:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
    December 9 from 9:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
    December 16 from 9:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.

Place: Three Lafayette Center, 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 
Lobby Level Hearing Room (Room 1000).

Status: Open.

Matters To Be Considered: The Commission has scheduled these meetings 
to consider the issuance of various proposed rules. Agendas for each of 
the scheduled meetings will be made available to the public and posted 
on the Commission's Web site at http:[sol][sol]www.cftc.gov at least 
seven (7) days prior to the meeting. In the event that the times or 
dates of the meetings change, an announcement of the change, along with 
the new time and place of the meeting will be posted on the 
Commission's Web site.

Additional Information: Meeting Cancellation.
    The Commission has canceled the meeting scheduled for November 30, 
2010.

Contact Person For More Information: David A. Stawick, Secretary of the 
Commission, 202-418-5071.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-29357 Filed 11-17-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Thomas M. Duff, Chief Executive Officer of Wellman, Inc., certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Wellman, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internalcontrol over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) Designed such internal control over financialreporting, or caused such internal control overfinancial reporting to be designed under oursupervision, to provide reasonable assurance regardingthe reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors: a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.   Date May 9, 2006 By: /s/ Thomas M. Duff     Chief Executive Officer
TSCA-HQ--0016 et al. Attachment A 3Q 2007 Progress Report 

SEP Biodegradation: Synthesis Account - VZ78101073 (DuPont Funded)

January February March

1Q 2007 

Sum April May June

2Q 2007 

Sum July August Septembe

Salaries 

Chambers Works 1,507 1,507 0 0 0 0 

Barley Mill 0 0 0 0 0 

Travel 0 000 0 Operating Supplies 0 0 0 0 0 CCAS Analytical 0 0 0 43,550 29,250 RAS Analytical 0 0 0 0 0 Overheads 0 000 0 

Chambers Works 485 485 0 0 0 0 Barley Mill 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 1,992 0 0 1,992 000

0 0 43,550 29,250 

SEP Biodegradation: Main Account - VZ78911724 (SEP Eligible)

January February March

1Q 2007 

Sum April May June

2Q 2007 

Sum July August Septembe

Salaries 

Chambers Works 5,796 6,976 7,038 19,810 6,940 7,164 7,285 21,389 7,020 7,060 6,958 

Barley Mill 1,139 151 137 1,427 151 144 149 444 0 0 713 

Travel 0 0 0 0 0 Operating Supplies 32 32 0 0 0 0 Exygen 0 0 0 0 0 ILSI Research Foundation 0 28,735 28,735 0 0 0 Overheads 0 000 0 

Chambers Works 1,455 1,815 1,797 5,067 1,725 1,725 1,725 5,175 1,725 1,725 1,725 Barley Mill 144 9 8 161 19 17 17 53 0 0 0 TOTAL 8,566 8,951 8,980 26,497 8,835 9,050 37,911 55,796 8,745 8,785 9,396 

Cost Summary for SEP Program January 1, 2007 to September 30, 2007
###### Editorial Note on Part 170

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 170 appear at 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001, and 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004.

#### § 170.203 Definitions.

The definitions and interpretations of terms in § 170.3 apply to such terms when used in this subpart. The following definitions also apply:

*Amendment* means any data and information that you submit regarding a filed GRAS notice before we respond to your notice by letter in accordance with § 170.265(b)(1) or cease to evaluate your notice in accordance with § 170.265(b)(3).

*GRAS* means generally recognized as safe.

*GRAS notice* means a submission that informs us of your view that a substance is not subject to the premarket approval requirements of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act based on your conclusion that the substance is GRAS under the conditions of its intended use in accordance with § 170.30.

*Notified substance* means the substance that is the subject of your GRAS notice.

*Notifier* means the person (*e.g.,* an individual, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity) who is responsible for the GRAS notice, even if another person (such as an attorney, agent, or qualified expert) prepares or submits the notice or provides an opinion about the basis for a conclusion of GRAS status.

*Qualified expert* means an individual who is qualified by scientific training and experience to evaluate the safety of substances under the conditions of their intended use in food.

*Supplement* means any data and information that you submit regarding a filed GRAS notice after we respond to your notice by letter in accordance with § 170.265(b)(1) or cease to evaluate your notice in accordance with § 170.265(b)(3).

*We, our,* and *us* refer to the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

*You* and *your* refer to a notifier.
09-5163-pr

Yusov v. Shaughnessy

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

SUMMARY ORDER

RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A

SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY

FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1. WHEN

CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE

EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION

“SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY

PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL. 

At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at

the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, in the City of New

York, on the 22nd day of October, two thousand ten.

PRESENT: JON O. NEWMAN, 

RALPH K. WINTER,

GERARD E. LYNCH,

Circuit Judges.

------------------------------------------------------------------

YURI YUSOV,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v. No. 09-5163-pr

JAMES M. SHAUGHNESSY, Supervisory Deportation Officer, et al.,

Respondents-Appellees.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

FOR APPELLANT: YURI YUSOV, pro se, New York, New York. 

FOR APPELLEE: PATRICIA BUCHANAN, Assistant United States Attorney

(Sue Chen, Special Assistant United States Attorney and

Benjamin H. Torrance, Assistant United States Attorney, on

the brief), for Preet Bharara, United States Attorney for the

Southern District of New York, New York, New York. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York

(Leonard B. Sand, Judge).
UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND

DECREED that the district court judgment is AFFIRMED. 

Petitioner-Appellant Yuri Yusov, pro se, appeals from the November 20, 2009 judgment of

the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Sand, J.) denying his 28

U.S.C. § 2241 petition. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and the

procedural history of the case.

This Court reviews the denial of a § 2241 petition de novo. See Armstrong v. Guccione, 470

F.3d 89, 96 (2d Cir. 2006). Having reviewed the appellant’s contentions on appeal and the record

of proceedings below, we affirm for substantially the same reasons stated by the district court in its

thorough opinion. 

We note, however, that while the appellant’s broad-based attack on the conditions of his

release is without merit, our rejection of that attack does not represent an endorsement of the

reasonableness of any particular condition. As the government pointed out at oral argument, the

appellant remains free to request changes in those conditions from the agency, and to pursue

administrative appeals of the denial of any such requests. The dismissal of the present action is

without prejudice to any avenue of judicial review that may be available to the appellant to challenge

any final decision of the agency rejecting such specific requests.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT: 

Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Clerk
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
UNITED STATES CODE)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Del Taco Income Properties IV (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of
the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|                      |  |                                                                 
|--------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2002 |  | /s/ Kevin K. Moriarty                                           
|                      |  |                                                                 
|                      |  | Kevin K. Moriarty
Director, Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer

|                      |  |                                                                    
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2002 |  | /s/ Robert J. Terrano                                              
|                      |  |                                                                    
|                      |  | Robert J. Terrano
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 6 (Monday, January 10, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1415-1416]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-339]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Oak Ridge 
Reservation

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of cancellation of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the cancellation of the January 12, 
2011,

[[Page 1416]]

meeting of the Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board 
(EM SSAB), Oak Ridge Reservation. The Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) requires that public notice of this 
meeting cancellation be announced in the Federal Register. The next 
regular meeting will be held on February 9, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia J. Halsey, Federal 
Coordinator, Department of Energy Oak Ridge Operations Office, P.O. Box 
2001, EM-90, Oak Ridge, TN 37831. Phone (865) 576-4025; Fax (865) 576-
2347 or e-mail: halseypj@oro.doe.gov or check the Web site at http://www.oakridge.doe.gov/em/ssab.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on January 6, 2011.
LaTanya R. Butler,
Acting Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-339 Filed 1-6-11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6405-01-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PRO TECH COMMUNICATIONS, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED OCTOBER
31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                         356,327
<SECURITIES>                                   257,936
<RECEIVABLES>                                  266,172
<ALLOWANCES>                                    12,095
<INVENTORY>                                    160,609
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,078,132
<PP&E>                                         155,400
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,239,143
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           89,159
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,254
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,149,984
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,239,143
<SALES>                                        996,993
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,025,681
<CGS>                                          333,755
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  658,785
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,924
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 28,159
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,885
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             20,274
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,274
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
§ 182.8991 Zinc oxide. ( a ) *Product.* Zinc oxide.
( b ) *Conditions of use.* This substance is generally recognized as safe when used in accordance with good manufacturing practice.
§ 801.1010 Suspending official (Department of Veterans Affairs supplement to government-wide definition at 2 CFR 180.1010). In addition to the suspending official listed at 2 CFR 180.1010, the suspending official for the Department of Veterans Affairs is: ( a ) For the Veterans Health Administration, the Under Secretary for Health;
( b ) For the Veterans Benefits Administration, the Under Secretary for Benefits; and
( c ) For the National Cemetery Administration, the Under Secretary for Memorial Affairs.
§ 1311.100 General. ( a ) This subpart addresses the requirements that must be met to issue and process Schedule II, III, IV, and V controlled substance prescriptions electronically.
( b ) A practitioner may issue a prescription for a Schedule II, III, IV, or V controlled substance electronically if all of the following conditions are met: ( 1 ) The practitioner is registered as an individual practitioner or exempt from the requirement of registration under part 1301 of this chapter and is authorized under the registration or exemption to dispense the controlled substance;
( 2 ) The practitioner uses an electronic prescription application that meets all of the applicable requirements of this subpart; and
( 3 ) The prescription is otherwise in conformity with the requirements of the Act and this chapter.
( c ) An electronic prescription for a Schedule II, III, IV, or V controlled substance created using an electronic prescription application that does not meet the requirements of this subpart is not a valid prescription, as that term is defined in § 1300.03 of this chapter.
( d ) A controlled substance prescription created using an electronic prescription application that meets the requirements of this subpart is not a valid prescription if any of the functions required under this subpart were disabled when the prescription was indicated as ready for signature and signed.
( e ) A registered pharmacy may process electronic prescriptions for controlled substances only if all of the following conditions are met: ( 1 ) The pharmacy uses a pharmacy application that meets all of the applicable requirements of this subpart; and
( 2 ) The prescription is otherwise in conformity with the requirements of the Act and this chapter.
( f ) Nothing in this part alters the responsibilities of the practitioner and pharmacy, specified in part 1306 of this chapter, to ensure the validity of a controlled substance prescription.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

10 a.m., Thursday, January 13, 2011.

# PLACE:

The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, 9th Floor, 601 New Jersey Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.

# STATUS:

Open.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

                        The Commission will hear oral argument in the matter                         *Secretary of Labor*                         v.                         *Ames Construction, Inc.,*                         Docket No. WEST 2009-693-M. (Issues include whether a non-production operator may be strictly liable for a violation occurring in an area which the operator allegedly controls or supervises.)                    

Any person attending this oral argument who requires special accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and 2706.160(d).

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

                        Jean Ellen, (202) 434-9950/(202) 708-                              ( print page 82397)                            9300 for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.                    

Jean H. Ellen,

Chief Docket Clerk.

[FR Doc. 2010-33038 Filed 12-28-10; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6735-01-P
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 20-3047

___________________________

Janet Hill,

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant,

v.

Bank of America, formerly known as Countrywide; America’s Wholesale Lender;

Bank of New York Mellon; MERS Inc.; Bony-TX/CT Government; Real Time

Resolutions, Inc.; Bayview Loan Servicing, also known as Bayview Financial,

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees,

Does 1-100,

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant.

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Iowa - Central

 ____________

 Submitted: May 21, 2021

Filed: June 9, 2021

[Unpublished]

____________

Before COLLOTON, SHEPHERD, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.

____________
PER CURIAM.

Janet Hill appeals the district court’s1 order dismissing her action seeking to

confirm a purported arbitration award. Having carefully reviewed the record and the

parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude that the district court did not err in

dismissing the action. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

1The Honorable Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger, United States District Judge for

the Southern District of Iowa. 

-2-