alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### The role of ground water in the national water situation: With state summaries based on reports by District Offices of Ground Water Branch

By: Charles Lee McGuinness

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1800

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Ground water in the United States has emerged from a quantitatively minor (though incalculably valuable) water source, whose chief role was in the settlement of primitive areas, to a major source now accounting for one-fifth to one-sixth of the Nation's total withdrawal requirements for water. With the growth in ground-water withdrawals is an accompanying growth in the realization that large-scale development of ground water is feasible only on the basis of a fuller understanding than has existed to date of the complex interrelations of the hydrologic cycle and of ground water's place in the cycle

This report outlines briefly the principles of water occurrence and describes the water situation in the United States as of 1960-61, with emphasis on the occurrence of ground water and the status of development and accompanying problems. The Nation has been divided into 10 major ground-water regions by H. E. Thomas (1952a). The report summarizes the occurrence and development of ground water in each of Thomas' regions. In a large terminal section it also describes the occurrence and development of water, again with emphasis on ground water, in each of the 50 States and in certain other areas. The main text ends with a discussion of the water situation and prospects of the Nation.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### § 376.220 What contracts and subcontracts, in addition to those listed in 2 CFR 180.220, are covered transactions?

In addition to the contracts covered under 2 CFR 180.220(b), this part also applies to all lower tiers of subcontracts under covered nonprocurement transactions, as permitted under the OMB guidance at 2 CFR 180.220(c). (See optional lower tier coverage in the diagram in the appendix to 2 CFR part 180.)
Phantom	Flight	Manual

AIRCRAFT Weight – w/battery	&	props 2.73	lbs Diagonal	Motor	to	Motor	Distance 13.7	inches Max	Flight	Speed	(Not	recommended) 33	mph Max.	Ascent/Descent	Speed 19	f ee t/sec.	/	9	feet/sec. REMOTE	CONTROLLER Operating	Frequency 5.728	GHZ - 5.85	GHz Communication	Distance FCC	Compliance			0.5	miles	(2624	ft.) RANGE	EXTENDER Operating	Frequency 5.728GHz – 5.85	GHz Communication	Distance 1630	Feet- 2270	Feet
Duty First www.riley.army.mil www.riley.army.mil Duty First
Duty First www.riley.army.mil www.riley.army.mil Duty First
Duty First www.riley.army.mil www.riley.army.mil Duty First
Duty First www.riley.army.mil www.riley.army.mil Duty First
Duty First www.riley.army.mil www.riley.army.mil Duty First
Duty First www.riley.army.mil www.riley.army.mil Duty First
Duty First www.riley.army.mil www.riley.army.mil Duty First
Duty First www.riley.army.mil www.riley.army.mil Duty First
Duty First www.riley.army.mil www.riley.army.mil Duty First
Duty First www.riley.army.mil www.riley.army.mil Duty First
Duty First www.riley.army.mil www.riley.army.mil Duty First
Duty First www.riley.army.mil www.riley.army.mil Duty First
Duty First www.riley.army.mil www.riley.army.mil Duty First

Winter Winter
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 857 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 857

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         June 12, 2006.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 4939) making 
emergency supplemental appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 
2006, and for other purposes. All points of order against the conference report 
and against its consideration are waived. The conference report shall be 
considered as read.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7614

ROBERT E. SAMPSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

HIGHLAND COUNTY VA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS; MAYOR, City of 

Monterey; T.J. DUFF, Highland County Sheriff,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Chief 

District Judge. (7:15-cv-00465-GEC-RSB)

Submitted: February 18, 2016 Decided: June 14, 2016

Before WILKINSON, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert E. Sampson, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert E. Sampson seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) 

complaint as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) 

(2012). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final 

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory 

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. 

Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The 

order Sampson seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an 

appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Domino Sugar 

Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 

(4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of 

jurisdiction and remand the case to the district court with 

instructions to allow Sampson to file an amended complaint. See

Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, 807 F.3d 619, 630 (4th Cir. 

2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED AND REMANDED
§ 168.121 Dried glucose sirup. ( a ) Dried glucose sirup is glucose sirup from which the water has been partially removed and conforms to the specifications of § 168.120, except that: ( 1 ) The total solids content is not less than 90.0 percent m/m when the reducing sugar content (dextrose equivalent), expressed as D-glucose, is not less than 88.0 percent m/m, calculated on a dry basis; or
( 2 ) The total solids content is not less than 93.0 percent m/m when the reducing sugar content, (dextrose equivalent) expressed as D-glucose, is less than 88.0 percent m/m, calculated on a dry basis.
( b ) The name of the food is “Dried glucose sirup” or “Glucose sirup solids”. When the food is derived from a specific type of starch, the name may alternatively be “Dried ______ sirup” or “______ sirup solids”, the blank to be filled in with the name of the starch; for example, “Dried corn sirup”, “Corn sirup solids”, “Dried wheat sirup”, “Wheat sirup solids”, “Dried tapioca sirup”, “Tapioca sirup solids”. When the starch is derived from sorghum grain, the alternative name of the food is “Dried sorghum grain sirup” or “Sorghum grain sirup solids”. The word “sirup” may also be spelled “syrup”.
CERTIFICATION
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ Nathan ZommerNathan Zommer, Chairman of the Board,President and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 2.02



                         FORM OF CERTIFICATE OF MERGER

        The undersigned, the President of Corixa Corporation, a Delaware
corporation ("Corixa"), hereby certifies in connection with the merger of Corixa
and Ribi ImmunoChem Research, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Ribi") that:

        1. The name and state of incorporation of each of the constituent
corporations of the merger is as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
               NAME                                   STATE OF INCORPORATION
<S>                                                   <C>
               Corixa Corporation                            Delaware
               Ribi ImmunoChem Research, Inc.                Delaware
</TABLE>

        2. An agreement and plan of merger has been approved, adopted,
certified, executed and acknowledged by each of the constituent corporations in
accordance with the requirements of Section 251 of the General Corporation Law
of the State of Delaware.

        3. The name of the surviving corporation of the merger is Corixa
Corporation.

        4. The certificate of incorporation of Corixa, the surviving
corporation, shall be the certificate of incorporation of the surviving
corporation.

        5. The executed agreement and plan of merger is on file at an office of
the surviving corporation. The address of the office of the surviving
corporation at which the agreement of merger is filed is 1124 Columbia Street,
Suite 200, Seattle, Washington 98104.

        6. A copy of the agreement and plan of merger will be furnished by the
surviving corporation, on request and without cost, to any stockholder of any
constituent corporation.

        Corixa has caused the Certificate to be signed by Steven Gillis, Ph.D.,
its authorized officer, this _____ day of __________, 1999.


                                        CORIXA CORPORATION


                                        By:_____________________________________
                                           Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned, Stephen I. Sadove, Chief Executive Officer of Saks Incorporated (the Company), has executed this
certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 3, 2008 (the Report).

The undersigned hereby certifies that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 5th day of June, 2008.



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|                                         
|                                         
|/s/ Stephen I. Sadove                    
|Stephen I. Sadove Chief Executive
Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Saks Incorporated
and will be retained by Saks Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-50245 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ALFREDO SOTO-VAQUERA, also known as Alfred Soto, also known as Alfredo Soto, also known as Alfredo Vaguerra Soto, also known as Alfredo Soto Vaguerra, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-03-CR-401-ALL

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Alfredo SotoVaquera concedes that the arguments raised are foreclosed by circuit precedent but seeks to preserve them for further review. The Government has moved for summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. The motion is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## F I L E D August 18, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
Editorial Note on Part 172
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 172 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; 70 FR 72074, Dec. 1, 2005; and 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 172.230 Microcapsules for flavoring substances. Microcapsules may be safely used for encapsulating discrete particles of flavoring substances that are generally recognized as safe for their intended use or are regulated under this part, in accordance with the following conditions: ( a ) The microcapsules may be formulated from the following components, each used in the minimum quantity required to accomplish the intended effect: ( 1 ) Substances generally recognized as safe for the purpose.
( 2 ) One or more of the following components: component and limitations Succinylated gelatin—Not to exceed 15 percent by combined weight of the microcapsule and flavoring oil. Succinic acid content of the gelatin is 4.5 to 5.5 percent. Arabinogalactan—Complying with § 172.610; as adjuvant. Silicon dioxide—Complying with § 172.480; as adjuvant.
( 3 ) In lieu of the components listed in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, the following components: component and limitations Glutaraldehyde—As cross-linking agent for insolubilizing a coacervate of gum arabic and gelatin. *n*-Octyl alcohol—As a defoamer.
( 4 ) In lieu of the components listed in paragraphs (a)(2) and (3) of this section, the following component: component and limitations Petroleum wax—Complying with § 172.886. Not to exceed 50 percent by combined weight of the microcapsule and spice-flavoring substance.
( b ) The microcapsules produced from the components listed in paragraphs (a)(1), (2), and (3) of this section may be used for encapsulating authorized flavoring oils for use, in accordance with good manufacturing practice, in foods for which standards of identity established under section 401 of the Act do not preclude such use, except that microcapsules formulated from components listed in paragraph (a)(2) of this section may be used only for encapsulating lemon oil, distilled lime oil, orange oil, peppermint oil, and spearmint oil for use in dry mixes for puddings and gelatin desserts.
( c ) The microcapsules produced from the components listed in paragraphs (a)(1) and (4) of this section may be used only for encapsulating authorized spice-flavoring substances for use, in accordance with good manufacturing practice, in frozen pizzas which are to be further processed by heat. Such pizzas shall bear labels or labeling including adequate directions for use to ensure heating to temperatures which will melt the wax to release the spice-flavoring substances.
[45 FR 48123, July 18, 1980]
Exhibit 32.02

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of Amerityre Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-
KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anders A. Suarez,
Chief Financial Officer [Principal Financial Officer], of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

 (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/S/ Anders A. Suarez
Anders A. Suarez
Chief Financial Officer

September 26, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### § 20.55 Indexing trade secrets and confidential commercial or financial information.

Whenever the Food and Drug Administration denies a request for a record or portion thereof on the grounds that the record or portion thereof is exempt from public disclosure as trade secret or confidential commercial or financial data and information under § 20.61, and the person requesting the record subsequently contests the denial in the courts, the Food and Drug Administration will so inform the person affected, i.e., the person who submitted the record, and will require that such person intervene to defend the exempt status of the record. If a court requires the Food and Drug Administration to itemize and index such records, the Food and Drug Administration will so inform the person affected and will require that such person undertake the itemization and indexing of the records. If the affected person fails to intervene to defend the exempt status of the records and to itemize and index the disputed records, the Food and Drug Administration will take this failure into consideration in deciding whether that person has waived such exemption so as to require the Food and Drug Administration to promptly make the records available for public disclosure.

[42 FR 15616, Mar. 22, 1977, as amended at 59 FR 535, Jan. 5, 1994. Redesignated at 68 FR 25286, May 12, 2003]
§ 169.178 Concentrated vanilla flavoring. ( a ) Concentrated vanilla flavoring conforms to the definition and standard of identity and is subject to any requirement for label statement of ingredients prescribed for vanilla flavoring by § 169.177, except that it is concentrated to remove part of the solvent, and each gallon contains two or more units of vanilla constituent as defined in § 169.3(c).
( b ) The specified name of the food is “Concentrated vanilla flavoring __-fold” or “__-fold concentrated vanilla flavoring”, the blank being filled in with the whole number (disregarding fractions) expressing the number of units of vanilla constituent per gallon of the article. (For example, “Concentrated vanilla flavoring 3-fold”.)
[42 FR 14479, Mar. 15, 1977, as amended at 58 FR 2886, Jan. 6, 1993]
**Exhibit No. 32.1**

 

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATIONS UNDER RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT**

 

 

Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each of the undersigned certifies that this periodic report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of BNCCORP, Inc. and Subsidiaries.

 

BNCCORP, Inc.

 

 

| Date: March 27, 2007 | By     | /s/ Gregory K. Cleveland |
|----------------------|--------|--------------------------|
|                 |   | Gregory K. Cleveland     |
|                 |   | Chief Executive Officer  |
|                 |   |                     |
|                 |   |                     |
|                 | By     | /s/ Timothy J. Franz     |
|                 |   | Timothy J. Franz         |
|                 |   | Chief Financial Officer  |
|                 |   |                     |