p. 1 

# OAR Box 1477 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 17 ) ll-J- 8 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/31/2008 11:18:29 AM Sheet 17 of 36P. 2

From : To : Date : Subject : Keith , <GPI4FRP@aol.com >

RTP 3 RTMU546(BARNETT-KEITH ) 1/10/0 0 5:45p m (n o subject )

I hav e attache dadraf

t ofou r responc e t o th e MAC T draft . Pleas e tak e aloo k

at i t an dcall o r

emai l me wit

h an y question s o r

comments . Phon e 715-359-612 3 Emai l GPI4FRP@aol.co m 

### j:92C3 l EP A AI R DOCKE T 

# J Sincerely , Brian Zinse rP. 3

N . A

GP I Number : 011099-BZ-01-CF A January 10 , 199 9 EP A Attentio n : Keith Barnet t Referenc e : Alternativ e industry standar d Subjec t : Comment s Keith , I hav e reviewe dth e draf t o f th e MAC T requirement s an dhav e several comment s o n th e impact s thes e change s woul dhav e o n GPI . W e hav e approximatel y 35-4 0 employee s an dmanufacture custo mFR P product s primarily corrosio n product s for

industrial use . W e currentl y utiliz e som e flo w coater s an dar e i n th e proces s o f

gettin g more . W e als o utiliz e Venu s Pr o Gun s for

th e applicatio n o f

ge l coat s wit

h lo w emissions . W e ar e currentl y utilizin g lo w styren e material s wher e eve r possible . However , i

n alo t o f applications , ou r

customer s specif

y th e specifi c resi n the y require . Als o i n th e majorit

y o f situations , th e chemica

l servic e ma

y limit u s t o only on e resi n whic h ma y no t b e lo w styrene . Man y ofth e corrosio n part s tha t w e manufacture hav e comple x shape s an drequir e ver y goo d secondary bonding . A s pe r th e MAC T draf

t w e wer e supplied , vapo r

suppressant s ar e no t

conduciv e t o manufacturin g comple x corrosio n products . Mos t ofth e part s tha t

w e manufacture , ar e ver

y larg e rotationall y molde dcylindrica l tank s tha t ar e eithe r filament woun do r constructe do f

rando mfiber

mat . Al l mos t al l ofth e remainin g part s tha t w e manufactur e hav e ver y comple x shapes . I t

i s impractical t o cove r

thes e product s wit

h a plasti c filmt o reduc e emissions . Sinc e w e ar e asmaller

manufacture , i t

i s no t economicall y feasibl e for u s t o instal l a

n incinerato r

t o contro l ou r

emissions . W e hav e calculate dexperimentin g with ne w equipmen t cost s u s approximatle y twic e a s muc h a s utilizin g curren t

equipmen t

unti l w e ge t

throug h th e learnin g curve . W e estimat e tha t

ou r first year cos t for labo r for recor dkeepin g woul db e $ 33,902.0 0 an d ou r annual cos t

fo r recor dkeepin g woul db e $ 4,255.00 . Thes e figures ar e base do n th e labo r rate s an drecordin g hour s show n i n th e Mac t

draft . Thes e cost s ar e only estimate s an dd o no t includ e th e cos t o f filing, copying , etc. . Base do n (3 ) trial s pe r

groupin g an d$ 3,000.00/tria l a s state di n th e MAC T draft , ou r

cos t for thes e trial s woul db e a

n estimate d$ 54,000.00 .P. 4



### Th e majorit y ofth e proposedregulation change s ar e not feasibl e fo r us , an di f impose dwoul d drive u s an dmost othe r smalle r manufacture s out

ofth e marke

t place . If yo u have an y question s o

n thes e comments , pleas e fee l free t o call . Sincerely , Bria n Zinse r