alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Semele Group
Inc.'s Form 10QSB for the three months ended March 31, 1999 and is qualified in
its entrety by reference to such Form 10QSB.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       7,038,453
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,002,678
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,112,764
<PP&E>                                      22,914,328
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              37,361,760
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,476,655
<BONDS>                                     21,365,566
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,778,802
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                37,361,760
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               463,661
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               937,647
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (473,986)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (473,986)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (473,986)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.42)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1085 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1085

 To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide enhanced penalties 
  for convicted murderers who kill or target America's public safety 
                               officers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 10, 2017

   Mr. Toomey (for himself, Mr. Blunt, Mrs. Capito, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. 
 Cotton, Mr. Cruz, Mrs. Fischer, Mr. Hoeven, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Kennedy, 
Mr. Lankford, Mr. Lee, Mr. McCain, Mr. Moran, Mr. Perdue, Mr. Portman, 
Mr. Risch, Mr. Tillis, and Mr. Sullivan) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide enhanced penalties 
  for convicted murderers who kill or target America's public safety 
                               officers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Thin Blue Line Act''.

SEC. 2. AGGRAVATING FACTORS FOR DEATH PENALTY.

    Section 3592(c) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting after paragraph (16) the following:
            ``(17) Killing or targeting of law enforcement officer.--
                    ``(A) The defendant killed or attempted to kill, in 
                the circumstance described in subparagraph (B), a 
                person who is authorized by law--
                            ``(i) to engage in or supervise the 
                        prevention, detention, investigation, or 
                        prosecution, or the incarceration of any person 
                        for any criminal violation of law;
                            ``(ii) to apprehend, arrest, or prosecute 
                        an individual for any criminal violation of 
                        law; or
                            ``(iii) to be a firefighter or other first 
                        responder.
                    ``(B) The circumstance referred to in subparagraph 
                (A) is that the person was killed or targeted--
                            ``(i) while he or she was engaged in the 
                        performance of his or her official duties;
                            ``(ii) because of the performance of his or 
                        her official duties; or
                            ``(iii) because of his or her status as a 
                        public official or employee.''.
                                 <all>
```
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANTOINE L. HENDERSON,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

K. PURCELL; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 11-17567

D.C. No. 2:09-cv-02779-LKKDAD

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Lawrence K. Karlton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 16, 2013** 

Before: CANBY, IKUTA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Antoine L. Henderson appeals pro se from the

district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging

deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28

FILED

APR 23 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-17567

U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th

Cir. 2004), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Henderson

failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether defendants failed to

diagnose and respond adequately to his back and groin pain. See id. at 1058

(prison officials act with deliberate indifference only if they know of and disregard

an excessive risk to inmate health); Jackson v. McIntosh, 90 F.3d 330, 332 (9th

Cir. 1996) (to establish that a difference of opinion amounted to deliberate

indifference, a prisoner must show that the defendants’ chosen course of treatment

was medically unacceptable and in conscious disregard of an excessive risk to the

prisoner’s health); Roberts v. Spalding, 783 F.2d 867, 870 (9th Cir. 1986) (a

prisoner has no constitutional right to outside medical care to supplement the

medical care provided by the prison). 

AFFIRMED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MICHAEL LYNN WRIGHT, JR.,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 197 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 5th day of October, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.

Justice Wecht did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp el l ant . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T ER I C DAV I D H OFFE RT , P e titio n e r- A p p e lla n t, v. C HA R L E S L . R YA N an d S T AT E OF ARI ZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL, R esp o n d en t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 09- 17536 D . C . N o . 2 : 0 8 - c v - 0 1 2 6 8 - J WS ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A r i z ona J ohn W . S e dw i c k, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d J a nua ry17, 2012 ** B efo re: L E A V Y , T A L L M A N , an d C A L L A H A N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. A ri zona st at e pri soner E ri c D avi d H offe rtappeal s pro se fr om the di stri ct c ourt ’ s j udgm e ntde ny i ng hi s 28 U . S . C . § 2254 habe a s pe t i t i on. W e ha ve j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 2 2 5 3 , a n d w e a f f i rm. 

# FI LED JAN 27 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 17536 2 H offe rtcont ends thathi s due proces s r i gh t s w er e vi ol at ed because he w as c onvi c t e d f

orc onduc tnotpr ohi bi t e d byA r i z onal a w . S pe c i f i c a l l y , he c ont e nds thatA ri zona R evi se d S t atut e § 13 -130 4(A ) r equi re s the st at e t o p rove thatH offe rt p o s s e s s e d th e in te n t to c o m m it as e x u a l o f f e n s e a t th e tim e th a t h e in itia lly r e s tr a in e d th e v ic tim o r , a t th e la te s t, p r io rto h is d e p a rtu r e f r o m th e s ta te . T h e r e is no c onvi nc i ng e vi de nc e tha tthe A r i z onaS upr e m e C ourtw oul d ha ve r e j e c t e d the C o u rt o f A p p e a ls ’ in te rp r e ta tio n . Se e I n r e W a tts , 29 8 F . 3d 10 77 , 10 82 (9th C i r. 20 02 ). A cc ordi ng l y, the st at e c ou rt ’ s dec i si on w as no tcontraryt o, or an u n r e a s o n ab le ap p lic a tio n o f , c le a r lye s tab lis h e d f

e d e r a l la w . See 2 8 U . S. C. § 2 2 5 4 ( d ) ( 1 ) ; Fio r e v . W h ite , 531 U . S . 225, 228- 29 ( 2001) ( pe rc ur i a m ) ( due pr oc e s s c l aus e f

orbi ds as t a t e t o c onvi c tape r s on of ac r i m e w i thoutpr ovi ng the el em ent s of thatcr i m e bey on d a re as on abl e dou bt ). AF F I RME D.
###### Editorial Note on Part 184

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 184 appear at 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; and 81 FR 49897, July 29, 2016.

#### § 184.1011 Alginic acid.

(a) Alginic acid is a colloidal, hydrophilic polysaccharide obtained from certain brown algae by alkaline extraction.

(b) The ingredient meets the specifications of the Food Chemicals Codex, 3d Ed. (1981), p. 13, which is incorporated by reference. Copies are available from the National Academy Press, 2101 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20418, or available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.*

(c) In accordance with § 184.1(b)(2), the ingredient is used in food only within the following specific limitations:

| Category of food | Maximum level of use in food (as served) | Functional use |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Soup and soup mixes, § 170.3(n)(40) of this chapter | Not to exceed current good manufacturing practice | Emulsifier, emulsifier salt, § 170.3(o)(8) of this chapter; formulation aid, § 170.3(o)(14) of this chapter; stabilizer, thickener, § 170.3(o)(28) of this chapter. |

(d) Prior sanctions for this ingredient different from the use established in this section do not exist or have been waived.

[47 FR 47375, Oct. 26, 1982]
[No. 16176-5-III.

Division Three.

January 13, 1998.]

#### Christine A. McGreevy, *Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of*William J. McGreevy, *Respondent,*v. Oregon Mutual Insurance Company, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Garfield County, No. 4936, John M. Lyden, J., entered September 26, 1996. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Brown, J., concurred in by Schultheis, C.J., and Sweeney, J. Now published at 90 Wn. App. 283.
PREFLIGHT CHECKLIST

 AREA OF FLIGHT..................................CHECK FOR HAZARDS

 BATTERY LEVELS ................................CHECK(A/C, REMOTE, AND TABLET)

 PROPS .......................................................CHECK AND SECURE

 LENS FILTER ..........................................CHECK

 REMOTE CONTROL..............................ON 

 TABLET IN AIRPLANE MODE............CONFIRM

 FLIGHT MODE SWITCH......................P – Mode

 A/C POWER..............................................ON

 DJI PILOT APP........................................ON AND CONNECTED

o ON SCREEN FLIGHT MODE .......CONFIRM P-ATTI & SAFE TO FLY

o A/C BATTERY STATUS..................CHECKED

o FREQUENCIES.........................CHECK

 COMPASS.................................................CALIBRATE

 GPS SIGNAL ............................................AQUIRED (FLASHING GREEN)

 HOME POINT ..........................................SET

 GIMBAL MODE ......................................SET

 CAMERA SETTINGS..............................SET

 AREA .........................................................CLEAR

 MOTORS...................................................ARM 

 FLIGHT CONTROLS..............................CHECKED

 TAKEOFF .................................................ACCOMPLISH

 LANDING GEAR .....................................UP

POSTFLIGHT CHECKLIST

 A/C..............................................................DISARM

 A/C POWER..............................................OFF

 REMOTE POWER...................................OFF

 PROPS .......................................................REMOVE / INSPECT

 MOTORS...................................................CHECK FREE AND CLEAR

 AIRFRAME...............................................INSPECT
§ 1240.90 Approval of treatment aboard conveyances. ( a ) The treatment of water aboard conveyances shall be approved by the Commissioner of Food and Drugs if the apparatus used is of such design and is so operated as to be capable of producing and in fact does produce, potable water.
( b ) The Commissioner of Food and Drugs may base his approval or disapproval of the treatment of water upon investigations made by representatives of State departments of health or of the health authorities of contiguous foreign nations.
( c ) Overboard water treated on vessels shall be from areas relatively free of contamination and pollution.
[40 FR 5620, Feb. 6, 1975, as amended at 48 FR 11431, Mar. 18, 1983]
# EUR-Lex - 31989D0271 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31989D0271

**89/271/EEC: Commission Decision of 30 March 1989 approving the plan relating to the examination for residues of substances other than those having a hormonal action submitted by Portugal (Only the Portuguese text is authentic) **

*
Official Journal L 108 , 19/04/1989 P. 0026 - 0026 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 30 March 1989 approving the plan relating to the examination for residues of substances other than those having a hormonal action submitted by Portugal (Only the Portuguese text is authentic) (89/271/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 86/469/EEC of 16 September 1986 concerning examination of animals and fresh meat for the presence of residues (1), and in particular Article 4 thereof,

Whereas, by letter of 22 June 1988, Portugal sent the Commission a plan setting out the national measures taken on the examination for residues of the substances referred to in Annex I, Groups A.III and B to Directive 86/469/EEC;

Whereas examination of this plan, as modified, has shown that it conforms to the provisions laid down in Directive 86/469/EEC, and in particular Article 4 (1) thereof;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1 The plan relating to the examination for residues of the substances referred to in Annex I, Groups A.III and B to Directive 86/469/EEC submitted by Portugal is hereby approved.

Article 2 Portugal shall adopt the necessary laws, regulations and administrative provisions for the implementation of the plan referred to in Article 1.

Article 3 This Decision is addressed to the Republic of Portugal.

Done at Brussels, 30 March 1989.

For the Commission

Ray MAC SHARRY

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 275, 26. 9. 1986, p. 36.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**AMANDA ST. HILAIRE AND ABC 27**

**NEWS**

**v.**

**OFFICE OF OPEN RECORDS (PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF**  **CORRECTIONS)**

**PETITION OF: PENNSYLVANIA**

**DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 976 MAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from**

**the Order of the Commonwealth Court**

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 6th day of April, 2016, the Petition for Allo wance of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**

**Justice Wecht notes his dissent.**
### Ground-water conditions in the Fernley-Wadsworth area, Churchill, Lyon, Storey and Washoe Counties, Nevada

By: William C. SinclairOmar J. Loeltz

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1619AA

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
§ 74.55 Item monitoring. ( a ) Licensees subject to § 74.51 shall provide the detection capability described in paragraph (b) of this section for laboratory samples containing less than 0.05 formula kilograms of SSNM and any uniquely identified items of SSNM that have been quantitatively measured, the validity of that measurement independently confirmed, and that additionally have been either: ( 1 ) Tamper-safed or placed in a vault or controlled access area that provides protection at least equivalent to tamper-safing; or
( 2 ) Sealed such that removal of SSNM would be readily and permanently apparent (e.g., encapsulated).
( b ) The licensee shall verify on a statistical sampling basis, the presence and integrity of SSNM items. The statistical sampling plan must have at least 99 percent power of detecting item losses that total five formula kilograms or more, plant-wide, within: ( 1 ) Thirty calendar days for Category IA items and 60 calendar days for Category IB items contained in a vault or in a permanently controlled access area isolated from the rest of the material access area (MAA);
( 2 ) Three working days for Category IA items and seven calendar days for Category IB items located elsewhere in the MAA, except for reactor components measuring at least one meter in length and weighing in excess of 30 kilograms for which the time interval shall be 30 days;
( 3 ) Sixty calendar days for items in a permanently controlled access area outside of an MAA; or
( 4 ) Sixty calendar days for samples in a vault or permanently controlled access area and 30 calendar days for samples elsewhere in the MAA for samples each containing less than 0.05 formula kilograms of SSNM.
( c ) Items containing scrap in the form of small pieces, cuttings, chips, solutions, or in other forms that result from a manufacturing process, held in containers of 30 gallon or larger, with an SSNM concentration of less than 0.25 grams per liter are exempt from the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section.
[52 FR 10040, Mar. 30, 1987, as amended at 80 FR 45844, Aug. 3, 2015]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          19,866
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 290,799
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,035
<BONDS>                                        173,146
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        28,381
<OTHER-SE>                                      32,508
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   290,799
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,588
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,523
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,521
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,775
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,769
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,631
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,138
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,138
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.37
        

</TABLE>