alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

      EXHIBIT 32 (a)

           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northland Cable Properties
      Seven Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10Q for the period
      ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
      on the date hereof (the "Form 10-Q"), I, John Whetzell, Chief Executive
      Officer of Northland Communications Corporation, the General Partner,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;

            (1)   The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13 (a) or (15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
                  U.S.C. 78m or 78(d)); and

            (2)   The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Partnership.

      DATE: 5-16-05

      /s/ JOHN S. WHETZELL
          ----------------------------
          John S. Whetzell
          Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Northland Cable Properties Seven Limited Partnership and will be
retained by Northland Cable Properties Seven Limited Partnership and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Scranton Securities Company, Inc., v. Finnegan

Before Eagen and Robinson, JJ.

*Leslie H. Simons,*for plaintiff.

*James E. O’Brien,*for defendant.

*576February 23, 1951.

Robinson, J.,

Judgment in the above case was entered November 13, 1929, against defendant for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense.

Plaintiff now petitions to amend the judgment alleging that defendant has since married and that plaintiff desires the record to show the present name of defendant “in order that lien on the judgment may be revived and continued and execution on said judgment may be properly issued”.

The Act of May 4,1852, P. L. 574, sec. 2,12 PS §533, gave to the courts “power, in any stage of the proceedings, to permit amendments by changing or adding the name or names of any party, plaintiff or defendant, whenever it shall appear to them that a mistake or omission has been made in the name or names of any such party” and it has long been established that the courts of this Commonwealth have inherent power to correct their own judgments: Simon v. Irwin, etc., 96 Pa. Superior Ct. 298; 7 Standard Pa. Practice, sec. 15 et seq.

The difficulty with plaintiff’s petition is that no error in the entry of the judgment is alleged and, indeed, from the record, the action was in all respects regular and free from mistake or omission. We are reluctant to hold that judgments may be amended from time to time by changing the names of the parties to the action merely because of a change in the status of a party occurring subsequent to the entry of the judgment, especially where there is a lapse of over 21 years after the entry of the judgment.

Plaintiff may accomplish the purposes of the petition by employment of a writ of scire facias to revive and continue the lien of the judgment, therein suggesting defendant’s marriage, in accordance with the long-established practice in this county.

Now, February 23, 1951, the petition to amend the judgment is dismissed.
#### Riley, Administratrix, *v.*Allen.

[No. 18,920.

Filed February 15, 1900.]

Appeal and Error —Record.—Instructions.—In order to make instructions a part of the record without a bill of exceptions the record must affirmatively show that they were filed with the clerk after being given or refused.

Prom the Boone Circuit Court.

*Affirmed.*

*T. J. Terhune,*for- appellant.

*8. M. Ralston*and *M. Keefe,'*for appellee.

Monks, J.

Appellant asks a reversal of this cause for alleged errors of the trial court in giving certain instructions, and in refusing to give the instructions requested by her.

The instructions given by the court, and the instructions requested by appellant and refused by the court, were not made a part of the record by a bill of exceptions, or an order of court, and the record does not show that those given were filed after they -were given and excepted to, nor that those requested by appellant were filed after being refused and the refusal excepted to. Appellee insists that in such condition of the record the instructions given and those refused are no part of the record, and no question is, therefore, presented concerning the correctness of said instructions, or either one of them. This contention of appellee must be sustained.

It is settled that to make instructions given or refused a part of the record without a bill of exceptions or order of court, they must be filed after being given or refused. Merely writing on the margin, or at the close of each instruc*177tion, “Eefused and excepted to”, or “Given and excepted to”, and showing who took said exception, and dating said memorandum, and the judge signing the same, does not make the instructions a part of the record, but after such exception they must be filed, and the record must affirmatively show that fact before they are a part of the record. *Krom*v. *Vermillion,*143 Ind. 75, 77; *Louisville, etc., R. Co.*v. *Wright,*115 Ind. 378, 393, 394, and cases cited; *Childress*v. *Callender,*108 Ind. 394; *Blount*v. *Rick,*107 Ind. 238, 240, 241, and cases cited; *Landwerlen*v. *Wheeler,*106 Ind. 523; Elliott’s App. Proc. §792; Woolen’s Trial Proc. §4063; Ewbank’s Manual §28. Instructions are not a part of the record when merely copied therein. *Olds*v. *Deckman,*98 Ind. 162.

Finding no available error in the record, the judgment is • affirmed.
EXHIBIT 21.1

                          SUBSIDIARIES OF VIATEL, INC.




                                               JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY:                            OR ORGANIZATION:
-------------------                            -----------------------------

Viatel U.K. Limited                                United Kingdom

Viaphone S.R.L.                                    Italy

Viatel S.R.L.                                      Italy

VPN, S.A.                                          France

Viatel S.A.                                        France

YYC Communications, Inc.                           Delaware

Viafon Dat Iberica, S.A.                           Spain

Viatel Global Communications Espana S.A.           Spain

Viatel SA/NV                                       Belgium

Viatel BV (branch) of Viatel Belgium               Belgium

Viatel Gmbh                                        Germany

Viatel Colombia Management, Inc.                   Delaware

Viatel Colombia Holdings, Inc.                     Delaware

Viatel Sales U.S.A., Inc.                          Delaware





<PAGE>
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.5










PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL




To: Mr. Marc FIRESTONE                            Lausanne, February 27, 2017


Subject: Merit Increase     




Dear Marc, 


Further to your annual performance assessment we confirm that your 2017 merit increase amounts to 2%. 


As a result of this increase, effective April 1, 2017, the following conditions of your employment have been modified according to the information detailed below:


Gross Base Salary: CHF 1’020’006.-- annually, CHF 78’462.-- monthly 


Comparatio: 100%


All other conditions relating to your employment with Philip Morris International Management SA remain as stated in your employment contract and in any subsequent amendments.


We would like to take this opportunity to wish you continued success and satisfaction.


 
Yours sincerely,


    


/S/ RALF ZYSK
Ralf Zysk
Vice President Compensation & Benefits  
and International Assignments 




Avenue de Rhodanie 50, 1007 Lausanne, Switzerland  T:+41 (58) 242 00 00, F: +41 (58) 242 01 11
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 80 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                     February 15, 2005.
Whereas every State in the United States has established a fire chiefs 
        association;
Whereas fire chiefs associations provide comprehensive and integrated statewide 
        public safety efforts, thereby enhancing the quality of life of American 
        citizens by reducing the effects of fire, medical, and environmental 
        emergencies;
Whereas all fire chiefs associations serve to provide educational resources to 
        firefighters, facilitate information exchange and regional cooperation 
        between firefighting entities, and provide professional development 
        workshops and training to all statewide and regional firefighters;
Whereas the mission statements of all fire chiefs associations have continuously 
        broadened beyond the original goals of working for the promotion of fire 
        prevention and protection from and extinguishment of fires to keep pace 
        with the new challenges and demands facing the 21st Century, working in 
        conjunction with the Nation's efforts in securing the homeland;
Whereas to accommodate the homeland security needs facing the Nation, the 
        mission statements of fire chiefs associations today include 
        facilitating the exchange of regional and national information, 
        organizing annual conferences and symposiums to discuss ways of 
        improving life-saving procedures, assisting in research studies, 
        assisting in the development of public education in fire prevention 
        programs, and supporting and encouraging the delivery of prehospital 
        emergency medical services by the fire service to relieve human 
        suffering;
Whereas the Virginia Fire Chiefs Association serves as a fine example of such a 
        State fire chiefs association, which has recognized the aforementioned 
        needs and broadened its mission to serve not only statewide interests, 
        but regional and national interests;
Whereas upon realizing the need for regional cooperation toward the advancement 
        of fire service in the United States, the Virginia Fire Chiefs 
        Association established the Mid-Atlantic Expo and Symposium, which 
        annually draws from States within the Mid-Atlantic region of the United 
        States and which serves to educate firefighters on new techniques; and
Whereas on the occasion of their 75th Anniversary, the Virginia Fire Chiefs 
        Association, will be once again hosting their annual Mid-Atlantic Expo 
        and Symposium, on February 24, 2005: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives commends all fire chiefs 
associations on the outstanding service that they provide to the citizens of the 
United States.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
§ 910.350 Applicability of 2 CFR part 200. ( a ) As stated in 2 CFR 910.22, unless otherwise noted in this part, the definition of Non-Federal entity found in 2 CFR 200.1 is expanded for DOE to include for-profit organizations in addition to states, local governments, Indian tribes, institutions of higher education (IHE), and nonprofit organizations.
( b ) A for-profit organization is defined as one that distributes any profit not reinvested into the business as profit or dividends to its employees or shareholders.
( c ) Subpart D of 2 CFR part 910 contains specific changes to 2 CFR part 200 that apply only to For-Profit Recipients and, unless otherwise specified, subrecipients. In some cases, the coverage in Subpart D will replace the language in a specific section of 2 CFR part 200.
[79 FR 76024, Dec. 19, 2014, as amended at 87 FR 15320, Mar. 18, 2022]
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2018102EN.01009901.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 23.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 102/99 |

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/589 of 18 April 2018 amending Annex XVII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) as regards methanol

(
[Official Journal of the European Union L 99 of 19 April 2018](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2018_099_R_TOC)
)

On page 9, in the Annex:

for:

| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | | --- | --- | | ‘69. | Methanol CAS No 67-56-1 EC No 200-659-6 | | Shall not be placed on the market to the general public after 9 May 2018 in windscreen washing or defrosting fluids, in a concentration equal to or greater than 0,6 % by weight.’ |

read:

| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | | --- | --- | | ‘69. | Methanol CAS No 67-56-1 EC No 200-659-6 | | Shall not be placed on the market to the general public after 9 May 2019 in windscreen washing or defrosting fluids, in a concentration equal to or greater than 0,6 % by weight.’ |

---
#### § 1.245 Waiver request.

Under §§ 1.231(a)(2) and (b), 1.234(d), and 1.235(d), beginning January 4, 2020, you must submit your registration, registration renewal, updates, and cancellations to FDA electronically unless FDA has granted a waiver from such requirement. Under § 1.232(a)(6), you must provide the email address of the owner, operator, or agent in charge of the facility unless FDA has granted a waiver from such requirement. In addition, under §§ 1.230(b) and (c), 1.232(a)(10), 1.234(a), and 1.235(b)(5), registration renewals, abbreviated registration renewals, registrations, updates, and cancellations not submitted by the owner, operator, or agent in charge must include the email address for the individual who authorized the submission, unless FDA has granted a waiver. To request a waiver from these requirements, you must submit a written request to FDA that explains why it is not reasonable for you to submit your registration, registration renewal, update, or cancellation to FDA electronically or to provide the email address of the owner, operator, or agent in charge of the facility. You must submit your request to: U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, 5001 Campus Dr. (HFS-681), College Park, MD 20740.

[81 FR 45953, July 14, 2016]
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 3, 2023 No. 04-22-00641-CV IN THE MATTER OF C.J.Z From the 386th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2022JUV00491 Honorable Jacqueline Herr-Valdez, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R Appellant’s brief was originally due on November 18, 2022 and was not filed. We notified appellant’s counsel of the deficiency on November 30, 2022. SeeT EX . R. A PP . P. 38.8(b)(2). In that notice, we instructed appellant to file a response by December 10, 2022 explaining why he has not timely filed a brief. To date, counsel has not responded to that notice. Accordingly, we order appellant to file his brief by January 13, 2023 . If appellant’s attorney fails to file the brief by the date ordered, we will abate this appeal and remand to the trial court for a hearing to determine whether appellant or appointed counsel has abandoned the appeal. T EX . R. A PP . P. 38.8(b)(2).

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 3rd day of January, 2023.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
Editorial Note on Part 172
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 172 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; 70 FR 72074, Dec. 1, 2005; and 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 172.861 Cocoa butter substitute from coconut oil, palm kernel oil, or both oils. The food additive, cocoa butter substitute from coconut oil, palm kernel oil, or both oils, may be safely used in food in accordance with the following conditions: ( a ) Cocoa butter substitute from coconut oil, palm kernel oil (CAS Reg. No. 85665-33-4), or both oils is a mixture of triglycerides. It is manufactured by esterification of glycerol with food-grade fatty acids (complying with § 172.860) derived from edible coconut oil, edible palm kernel oil, or both oils.
( b ) The ingredient meets the following specifications: Acid number: Not to exceed 0.5. Saponification number: 220 to 260. Iodine number: Not to exceed 3. Melting range: 30 to 44 °C.
( c ) The ingredient is used or intended for use as follows: ( 1 ) As coating material for sugar, table salt, vitamins, citric acid, succinic acid, and spices; and
( 2 ) In compound coatings, cocoa creams, cocoa-based sweets, toffees, caramel masses, and chewing sweets as defined in § 170.3 (n)(9) and (n)(38) of this chapter, except that the ingredient may not be used in a standardized food unless permitted by the standard of identity.
( d ) The ingredient is used in accordance with current good manufacturing practice and in an amount not to exceed that reasonably required to accomplish the intended effect.
[56 FR 66970, Dec. 27, 1991; 57 FR 2814, Jan. 23, 1992]
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,I, Gordon Ellis, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:1. To my knowledge, this report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2. To my knowledge, the information in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of International Absorbents Inc. as of October 31,2006.   Date: December 8, 2006 /s/ GORDON ELLIS     Gordon Ellis  *President and Chief Executive Officer*
Editorial Note on Part 184
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 184 appear at 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; and 81 FR 49897, July 29, 2016.

§ 184.1622 Potassium chloride. ( a ) Potassium chloride (KCl, CAS Reg. No. 7447-40-7) is a white, odorless solid prepared from source minerals by fractional crystallization or flotation. It is soluble in water and glycerol and has a saline taste at low concentration levels.
( b ) The ingredient meets the specifications of the Food Chemicals Codex, 3d Ed. (1981), p. 241, which is incorporated by reference. Copies are available from the National Academy Press, 2101 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20418, or available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .*
( c ) In accordance with § 184.1(b)(1), the ingredient is used in food with no limitation other than current good manufacturing practice. The affirmation of this ingredient as generally recognized as safe (GRAS) as a direct human food ingredient is based upon the following current good manufacturing practice conditions of use: ( 1 ) The ingredient is used as a flavor enhancer as defined in § 170.3(o)(11) of this chapter; as a flavoring agent as defined in § 170.3(o)(12) of this chapter; as a nutrient supplement as defined in § 170.3(o)(20) of this chapter; as a pH control agent as defined in § 170.3(o)(23) of this chapter; and as a stabilizer or thickener as defined in § 170.3(o)(28) of this chapter.
( 2 ) The ingredient is used in food at levels not to exceed current good manufacturing practice. Potassium chloride may be used in infant formula in accordance with section 412(g) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) or with regulations promulgated under section 412(a)(2) of the Act.
( d ) Prior sanctions for this ingredient different from the uses established in this section do not exist or have been waived.
[48 FR 51614, Nov. 10, 1983]
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 2011

- NM

- 187

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 94-7083

MICHAEL W. SLOAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

EDWARD W. MURRAY; VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; R. F.

WILSON; SARA THOMAS; LOU ANN WHITE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.

(CA-93-314-R)

Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: March 29, 1996

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael W. Sloan, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Elizabeth Shea, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Sloan v. Murray, No. CA-93-314-R (W.D. Va. Nov. 30, 1993 &

Aug. 31, 1994). We further deny Appellant's "Motion for Judgment."

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

IN THE MATTER OF MARTINAIRE AVIATION, LLC FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] FDMS NO. FAA-2013-0040 FAA Case No. 2011SW700189 (Civil PenaltyAction) Judge Richard C. Goodwin

NOTICE OFAPPEAL 

# RECEIVED APR1 72015 HEARINGDOCKET

Comes now the Administrator, acting through his Regional Counsel, and files this Notice of Appeal of the Initial Decision servedApril 10, 2015, in the above numbered and entitledmatter pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.233(a) of the Rules of Practice For FAA Civil PenaltyActions.

ERIC E. ANDERSON 

# --

**"~-Regional**l5 / Southwest

James Archier, Attorney General Litigation & Rulemaking Branch Federal AviationAdministration Fort Worth, Texas 76137 (817) 222-5074, FAX: (817) 222-5092 e-mail: james.archier@faa.gov
Dated: April 16, 2015CERTIFICATEOF SERVICE I hereby certifythat I have this date mailed via Federal Express an original and one copy of the Administrator's Notice of Appeal addressed to the following: Federal AviationAdministration 600 Independence Avenue, SW., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 I hereby certifythat I have this date mailed via Federal Express one copy of the Administrator's Notice ofAppeal addressed to the following:

By: Jam s Michael L. Dworkin, Respondent's Counsel Michael L. Dworkin and Associates Law Offices 465 California Street, Suite 210 San Francisco, California 94104-1808 TEL: (415) 421-2500 FAX: (415) 2560



## ' Dated: April 16, 2015 F eralAviationAdministration



### ~ /office of the Regional Counsel 

# I' //Southwest Region /, 2601 Meacham Blvd., L-/e Fort Worth, Texas 76137 (817) 222-5074

2