alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 172
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 172 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; 70 FR 72074, Dec. 1, 2005; and 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 172.381 Vitamin D2 bakers yeast. Vitamin D2 bakers yeast may be used safely in foods as a source of vitamin D2 and as a leavening agent in accordance with the following prescribed conditions: ( a ) Vitamin D2 bakers yeast is the substance produced by exposing bakers yeast (*Saccharomyces cerevisiae*) to ultraviolet light, resulting in the photochemical conversion of endogenous ergosterol in bakers yeast to vitamin D2 (also known as ergocalciferol or (9,10-seco(5Z,7E,22E)-5,7,10(19),22-ergostatetraen-3-ol)).
( b ) Vitamin D2 bakers yeast may be used alone as an active dry yeast concentrate or in combination with conventional bakers yeast.
( c ) The additive may be used in yeast-leavened baked goods and baking mixes and yeast-leavened baked snack foods at levels not to exceed 400 International Units of vitamin D2 per 100 grams in the finished food.
( d ) To assure safe use of the additive, the label or labeling of the food additive container shall bear, in addition to the other information required by the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, adequate directions for use to provide a final product that complies with the limitations prescribed in paragraph (c) of this section.
( e ) Labels of manufactured food products containing the additive shall bear, in the ingredient statement, the name of the additive, “vitamin D2 bakers yeast,” in the proper order of decreasing predominance in the finished food.
[77 FR 52231, Aug. 29, 2012]
§ 1138.720 Other reporting under subawards. ( a ) *Requirement.* A DoD Component's general terms and conditions must specify any requirements for other reporting that recipients must include in their subawards.
( b ) *Award terms and conditions.* To implement the requirement described in paragraph (a) of this section, a DoD Component's general terms and conditions must: ( 1 ) Include in Section E of SUB Article VII any reporting requirement included in REP Article V that may flow down to subrecipients, and
( 2 ) Indicate whether the recipient must require the subrecipient to provide any specific information or can comply by ensuring that the recipient meets its responsibilities to DoD.
Order filed December 31, 2012

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-12-01017-CV

____________

IN THE INTEREST OF M.C.R. AND A.J.R., Children

On Appeal from the 314th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2011-00769

ORDER

This is an accelerated appeal from a judgment in a suit in which the 

termination of the parent-child relationship is at issue Appellant’s brief was due 

December 28, 2012. No brief has been filed. 

Unless appellant files a brief with the clerk of this court within 10 days of 

the date of this order, the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See 

Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM
§ 3373.10 What does this part do? This part requires that the award and administration of NEH grants and cooperative agreements comply with Office of Management and Budget (OMB) guidance implementing the portion of the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 (41 U.S.C. 701-707, as amended, hereafter referred to as “the Act”) that applies to grants. It thereby— ( a ) Gives regulatory effect to the OMB guidance (Subparts A through F of 2 CFR part 182) for the NEH's grants and cooperative agreements; and
( b ) Establishes NEH policies and procedures for compliance with the Act that are the same as those of other Federal agencies, in conformance with the requirement in 41 U.S.C. 705 for Governmentwide implementing regulations.
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION**     Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the UnitedStates Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Nathan Zommer, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of IXYS Corporation (the “Company”), and Uzi Sasson, Vice President of Finance and ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:1. The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2006, to which thisCertification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Annual Report”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as amended; and2. The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.     **In Witness Whereof**, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 21st day of June,2006.   /s/ Nathan Zommer /s/ Uzi Sasson   Nathan Zommer Uzi SassonChairman of the Board, President Vice President of Finance and Chiefand Chief Executive Officer Financial OfficerThis certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing ofIXYS Corporation under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of anygeneral incorporation language contained in such filing.
Exhibit 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


         In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB,
Amendment No. 1, of Velocity Asset Management Inc. for the three months ended
March 31, 2005, I, John C. Kleinert, Chief Executive Officer of Velocity Asset
Management, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, that:

         (1) such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB, Amendment No. 1, for the
three months ended March 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB,
Amendment No. 1,for the three months ended March 31, 2005, fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Velocity Asset Management, Inc.



                                       /s/ JOHN C. KLEINERT
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       John C. Kleinert
                                       Chief Executive Officer



July 22, 2005


                                       27
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 613 

Congratulating the people of Iraq on the three national elections conducted 

in Iraq in 2005. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 15, 2005 

Mr. LANTOS (for himself, Ms. PELOSI, Mr. HOYER, and Mr. HASTINGS of 

Florida) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on International Relations, and in addition to the Committee 

on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the people of Iraq on the three national 

elections conducted in Iraq in 2005. 

Whereas the people of Iraq have consistently and courageously demonstrated their commitment to democracy by 

participating in three elections in 2005; 

Whereas on January 30, 2005, the people of Iraq participated in an election for a transitional national assembly; 

Whereas all segments of Iraqi society actively participated in 

the approval of a new Iraqi Constitution through a referendum held on October 15, 2005; 

Whereas reports indicate that the people of Iraq voted in unprecedented and overwhelming numbers in the most re-
2 

•HRES 613 IH 

cent election, held on December 15, 2005, for a new, national parliament that will serve in accordance with the 

recently-approved Iraqi Constitution for a four-year term 

and that represents the first fully sovereign, elected 

democratic assembly in the history of Iraq; 

Whereas this remarkable level of participation by the people 

of Iraq in the face of dire threats to their very lives has 

won the admiration of the world; 

Whereas the Iraqi elections could not have been conducted 

without the courage and dedication of the members of the 

United States Armed Forces and the armed forces of 

other nations in Iraq, including the members of the security forces of Iraq; and 

Whereas the December 15, 2005, election in Iraq inspires 

confidence that a robust, pluralistic democracy that will 

bring stability to Iraqi society is emerging: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) congratulates the people of Iraq on the 

3 three national elections conducted in Iraq in 2005; 

4 (2) encourages all Americans to express support 

5 for the people of Iraq in their efforts to achieve a 

6 free, open, and democratic society; and 

7 (3) expresses its thanks and admiration to the 

8 members of the United States Armed Forces and 

9 the armed forces of other nations in Iraq, including 
3 

•HRES 613 IH 

1 the members of the security forces of Iraq, whose 

2 heroism permitted the Iraqi people to vote safely. 

Æ
Exhibit 31.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Brent A. Beecham, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of SBH ASSOCIATES, INC.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  5. I, as the certifying officer have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  Date: October 7, 2016 By: /s/BRENT A. BEECHAM Brent A. Beecham Chief Financial Officer
(October 14, 1980)

#### Patrick J. Cunningham, Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent.

Motion by respondent for reargument denied, without costs. Motion and cross motion for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted, without costs. No issue of fact was considered by this court. Pursuant to CPLR 5713, this court certifies that the following question of law, decisive of the correctness of its determination, has arisen, which in its opinion ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals: "Was the order of this court, which modified the order of the Court of Claims by reinstating claimant’s cause of action for abuse of process and remitted the matter for further proceedings with the direction that claimant be granted leave to plead his special damages, correct as a matter of Law?” Greenblott, J. P., Sweeney, Main, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
90°00' 89°45'

Approximate eastern limits of

the Jackson-upper Claiborne

confining unit

Approximate eastern limit of

35°15'

90°15'

35°00'

0 5 MILES

0 5 KILOMETERS

ARKANSAS TENNESSEE

MISSISSIPPI

Study area

MORTON

MALLORY

LICHTERMAN

ALLEN

DAVIS

SHEAHAN

McCORD

SHAW

Walls

West Memphis

M emp h i s

Horne Lake

Olive Branch

Braden

Arlington

Cordova

Millington

Germantown

Collierville

FAYETTE CO

MARSHALL CO

64

51

55

240

57

72

64

40

70 79

51 14

78

70

79

14

61

40

ARKANSAS

TENNESSEE

ARKANSAS

MISSISSIPPI

Loosahatchie River

River

MISSISSIPPI

RIVER

Nonconnah Creek

M emp h i s

TIPTON CO

SHELBY CO

SHELBY CO

DESOTO CO

MISSISSIPPI CO

SHELBY CO

CRITTENDON CO

O

C

E

T

T

E

YAF

O

C

Y

B

L

E

H

S

55

Bartlett

Base from U.S. Geological Survey 1:24,000 and 

Mississippi River Commission 1:62,500 quadrangles

North American Datum of 1983

150

160

170

190

200

180

230

240

250

260

270

170

180

190

230

240

250

260

190

180

240

230

180

240

160

180

Fa:R-002

Sh:J-001

Sh:P-076

Sh:O-001

Sh:Q-001

260

220

210

200

170

140

170

190

210

220

230

230

160 160

170

73

74

40

38 34

2

106

104

103

101

99

97 98

93

92

91

85 80

79

78

71

66

65

64

62

59

57 5

55

53

52

51

44

42

31

30

63

27

20

22

19

16

14

69

25

13

3

17

1

4

12

9

11

7

6

Mississippi

embayment

Sh:J-001

16

EXPLANATION

180

Memphis Light, Gas and Water

Division well field and name

Potentiometric contour—Shows

altitude at which water level would have

stood in tightly cased wells. Dashed

where approximately located. Hachures

indicate depression. Contour interval

10 feet. Datum is National Geodetic Vertical

Datum of 1929 (NGVD 29)

Well for which water-level measurement 

made in October and November 2010 was used 

as control—Number corresponds to map 

well number in table 1, and station names 

(Sh:J-001, for example) identify wells shown 

on figure 5

DAVIS

Figure 3. Altitude of the potentiometric surface of the Memphis aquifer in the Memphis area, Tennessee, October and November 2010.
§ 1303.21 Individual manufacturing quotas. ( a ) The Administrator shall, on or before December 1 of each year, fix for and issue to each person who is registered to manufacture a basic class of controlled substance listed in Schedule I or II, and who applies for a manufacturing quota, an individual manufacturing quota authorizing that person to manufacture during the next calendar year a quantity of that basic class. The Administrator may establish an individual manufacturing quota in terms of pharmaceutical dosage-forms prepared from or containing the schedule I or II controlled substance, if they determine it will assist in avoiding the overproduction, shortages, or diversion of a controlled substance. Any manufacturing quota fixed and issued by the Administrator shall be subject to his authority to reduce or limit it at a later date pursuant to § 1303.26 and to his authority to revoke or suspend it at any time pursuant to § 1301.36 of this chapter.
( b ) No individual manufacturing quota shall be required for registrants listed in § 1303.12(e).
[36 FR 7786, Apr. 24, 1971. Redesignated at 38 FR 26609, Sept. 24, 1973, as amended at 62 FR 13958, Mar. 24, 1997; 83 FR32790, July 16, 2018; 88 FR 60141, Aug. 31, 2023]
Exhibit








Praxair, Inc. and Subsidiaries
	
	
	 




EXHIBIT 10.01


FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
AMENDED AND RESTATED
2009 PRAXAIR, INC. LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
This First Amendment to the Amended and Restated 2009 Praxair, Inc. Long Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) was adopted by the Board of Directors of Praxair, Inc. on January 24, 2017, and shall become effective upon shareholder approval on April 25, 2017.  The Plan is hereby amended as follows:
1.  Section 4.1 of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety as follows:


“4.1    Number of Shares Available for Awards. Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 4.5, the total number of Shares that may be issued pursuant to Awards under this Plan on or after April 25, 2017 (the “Amendment Effective Date”) is 8,000,000 Shares, plus the number of authorized Shares remaining available from the 8,000,000 Shares authorized for grant under the terms of this Plan immediately prior to the Amendment Effective Date and any additional Shares that become available for issuance under the Plan in accordance with Section 4.2 (including, for the avoidance of doubt, under Awards granted under this Plan prior to the Amendment Effective Date) (the “Share Authorization”).  The Shares available for issuance under this Plan may be authorized and unissued Shares or treasury Shares.  The maximum number of Shares of the Share Authorization that may be issued pursuant to ISOs under this Plan following the Amendment Effective Date shall be 8,000,000 Shares.  The maximum number of Shares of the Share Authorization that may be issued under this Plan pursuant to Awards other than Options or SARs following the Amendment Effective Date shall be 2,600,000 Shares.
2.      Section 4.2 of the Plan is amended to add the following sentence to the end thereof:  


“Notwithstanding the foregoing, in no event shall Shares underlying any underwater Option that is voluntarily surrendered by a Participant become available for grant under the Plan pursuant hereto.”


3.    Section 4.4 of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety as follows:
“4.4    Director Awards.  In order to retain and compensate Directors for their services, and to strengthen the alignment of their interests with those of the shareholders of the Company, the Plan permits the grant of stock-based awards to Directors. Aggregate compensation (including Awards) to any one Director in respect of any calendar year, solely with respect to his or her service as a Director, may not exceed $750,000, with the value of any Awards hereunder based on the Fair Market Value of stock-based Awards, determined as of the Grant Date.”
Editorial Note on Part 173
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 173 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; and 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 173.300 Chlorine dioxide. Chlorine dioxide (CAS Reg. No. 10049-04-4) may be safely used in food in accordance with the following prescribed conditions: ( a ) ( 1 ) The additive is generated by one of the following methods: ( i ) Treating an aqueous solution of sodium chlorite with either chlorine gas or a mixture of sodium hypochlorite and hydrochloric acid.
( ii ) Treating an aqueous solution of sodium chlorate with hydrogen peroxide in the presence of sulfuric acid.
( iii ) Treating an aqueous solution of sodium chlorite by electrolysis.
( 2 ) The generator effluent contains at least 90 percent (by weight) of chlorine dioxide with respect to all chlorine species as determined by Method 4500-ClO2 E in the “Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater,” 20th ed., 1998, or an equivalent method. Method 4500-ClO2 E (“Amperometric Method II”) is incorporated by reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. You may obtain a copy from the Office of Food Additive Safety (HFS-200), Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Food and Drug Administration, 5001 Campus Dr., College Park, MD 20740, 240-402-1200, or the American Public Health Association, 800 I St. NW., Washington, DC 20001-3750. You may inspect a copy at the Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852, 240-402-7500, between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .*
( b ) ( 1 ) The additive may be used as an antimicrobial agent in water used in poultry processing in an amount not to exceed 3 parts per million (ppm) residual chlorine dioxide as determined by Method 4500-ClO2 E, referenced in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, or an equivalent method.
( 2 ) The additive may be used as an antimicrobial agent in water used to wash fruits and vegetables that are not raw agricultural commodities in an amount not to exceed 3 ppm residual chlorine dioxide as determined by Method 4500-ClO2 E, referenced in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, or an equivalent method. Treatment of the fruits and vegetables with chlorine dioxide shall be followed by a potable water rinse or by blanching, cooking, or canning.
[60 FR 11900, Mar. 3, 1995. Redesignated at 61 FR 14245, Apr. 1, 1996, as amended at 61 FR 14480, Apr. 2, 1996; 63 FR 38747, July 20, 1998; 65 FR 34587, May 31, 2000; 70 FR 7396, Feb. 14, 2005; 81 FR 5592, Feb. 3, 2016; 88 FR 17723, Mar. 24, 2023]
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 5.1




                            [PERKINS COIE LETTERHEAD]

                                  July 30, 1997



InControl, Inc.
6675 - 185th Ave. NE
Redmond, WA  98052

         RE:      REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM S-8

Gentlemen and Ladies:

         We have acted as counsel to you in connection with the preparation of a
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (the "Registration Statement") under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Act"), which you are filing with the
Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to 1,000,000 shares of Common
Stock, $.01 par value (the "Shares"), which may be issued upon the exercise of
stock options granted or to be granted pursuant to the InControl, Inc. Restated
1990 Stock Option Plan (the "Plan"). We have examined the Registration Statement
and such documents and records of the Company and other documents as we have
deemed necessary for the purpose of this opinion.

         Based upon and subject to the foregoing, we are of the opinion that the
Shares that may be issued upon the exercise of stock options granted or to be
granted pursuant to the Plan have been duly authorized and that, upon the due
execution by the Company and the registration by its registrars of the Shares
and the sale thereof by the Company in accordance with the terms of the Plan,
and the receipt of the consideration therefor in accordance with the terms of
the Plan, the Shares will be validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable.

         We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement. In giving such consent, we do not admit that we are in
the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Act.

                                                     Very truly yours,

                                                     /s/ Perkins Coie