alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7224 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                 Union Calendar No. 431
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7224

                          [Report No. 118-519]

    To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the Stop, 
   Observe, Ask, and Respond to Health and Wellness Training Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 5, 2024

 Mr. Cohen (for himself, Mrs. Wagner, Mr. Cardenas, and Mr. Carter of 
   Georgia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

                              May 22, 2024

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the Stop, 
   Observe, Ask, and Respond to Health and Wellness Training Program.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE SOAR TO HEALTH AND WELLNESS TRAINING 
              PROGRAM.

    Section 1254(h) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300d-
54(h)) is amended by striking ``fiscal years 2020 through 2024'' and 
inserting ``fiscal years 2025 through 2029''.
                                                 Union Calendar No. 431

118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 7224

                          [Report No. 118-519]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

    To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the Stop, 
   Observe, Ask, and Respond to Health and Wellness Training Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 22, 2024

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed
```
Editorial Note on Part 173
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 173 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; and 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 173.355 Dichlorodifluoromethane. The food additive dichlorodifluoromethane may be safely used in food in accordance with the following prescribed conditions: ( a ) The additive has a purity of not less than 99.97 percent.
( b ) It is used or intended for use, in accordance with good manufacturing practice, as a direct-contact freezing agent for foods.
( c ) To assure safe use of the additive: ( 1 ) The label of its container shall bear, in addition to the other information required by the act, the following: ( i ) The name of the additive, dichlorodifluoromethane, with or without the parenthetical name “Food Freezant 12”.
( ii ) The designation “food grade”.
( 2 ) The label or labeling of the food additive container shall bear adequate directions for use.
To: File

From: Elizabeth Kohl, DOE GC-71

Date: June 25, 2009 Re: Ex parte discussion on rare earth phosphors

On April 1, 2009, Mahima Gupta and Robert Ca rmichael of Navigant Consulting spoke via phone with Steve Deutsch, Operational Marketing & Business Development Manager Rhodia Silcea NA. Ms. Gupta and Mr. Carmic hael asked Mr. Deut sch about the supply of rare earth phosphors as it rela tes to the final rule for ge neral service fluorescent and incandescent reflector lamps.

Mr. Deutsch said currently th ere is a balanced supply chai n for rare earth phosphors in the United States and the European Union. Ther e is the potential for a shortage in rare earths in 20-30 years, assuming China keeps its current policies. Concerns of any near term shortages would probably involve terbiu m, but long term shortage concerns may involve high-grade yttrium. Mr. Deutsch said there may be other sources of rare earth phosphors coming online in Australia, Canada , etc., although the rare earth phosphor content from these sources is probably not as good.

Mr. Deutsch said Rhodia is currently building up their reclamation capacity. The recycled triphosphor is degraded, but Rhodia distills it down to original elements and

then ‘recreates’ it, so there is not a loss of efficiency. The current supply chain looks like this: 95% of rare earth phosphors are mined in China; about 100 or so companies do the initial processing in China, distilling the mi ned material down to individual phosphors. Then those phosphors are shipped to a maybe five firms to be mixed and manufactured into triphosphor.

Mr. Deutsch indicated that down the road, a s hortage of terbium could occur because of its use in magnets. With the surge in hybrid cars a couple years ago, Rhodia saw a spike in the price of terbium. Rhodia expects a doubling of triphosphor demand in Western countries for linear fluorescent lamps in next fi ve to six years (in the base case), and a 4- fold increase in CFL triphosphor demand. Mr. Deutsch’s estimate of 20-30 years, as stated above, incorporates these increases. There is a standard of proven reserves for Western countries, but China is a guessing game.

End of conversation.
#### § 2900.14 Financial reporting.

In addition to the guidance set forth in 2 CFR 200.328, for Federal awards from the Department of Labor, the DOL awarding agency will prescribe whether the report will be on a cash or an accrual basis. If the DOL awarding agency requires reporting on an accrual basis and the recipient's accounting system is not on the accrual basis, the recipient will not be required to convert its accounting system, but must develop and report such accrual information through best estimates based on an analysis of the documentation on hand.

[79 FR 76081, Dec. 19, 2014, as amended at 86 FR 22108, Apr. 27, 2021]
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

___________________________

No. 97-30402

___________________________

In the Matter of: JAN BYRD HOLLAND,

Debtor,

JAN BYRD HOLLAND,

Appellant,

VERSUS

LOUISIANA SECRETARY OF REVENUE AND

 TAXATION; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA;

 UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,

Appellees.

___________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Western District of Louisiana

(96-CV-2689)

 ___________________________________________________

October 23, 1997

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The appellant argued to both the bankruptcy court and the

district court that the Internal Revenue Code does not impose

liability on him as an individual. He also argued that the

constitution prohibits imposition of such liability. The appellant

made a number of legal arguments in support of these contentions,
2

each of which the district court carefully addressed and rejected.

For reasons stated in its Memorandum Ruling and Judgment, issued on

February 7, 1997, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          36,459
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  818,836
<ALLOWANCES>                                    85,635
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,124,905
<PP&E>                                       2,231,473
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,681,184
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,351,963
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,642,265
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        32,162
<OTHER-SE>                                     639,305
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,351,964
<SALES>                                        768,138
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,508,753
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,135,460
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,284,139
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             121,571
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,983
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,983
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,983
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 1305.29 Reporting to DEA.

A supplier must, for each electronic order filled, forward either a copy of the electronic order or an electronic report of the order in a format that DEA specifies to DEA within two business days.
[No. 38392-2-I.

Division One.

October 27, 1997.]

#### *In the Matter of*Phillip Ernest Anselmo, *Appellant,*and Catherine Hanson, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 94-5-00833-1, Joseph A. Thibodeau, J., entered June 19, October 12, October 19, 1995 and February 26, 1996. *Affirmed in part*and *remanded*by unpublished opinion per Agid, J., concurred in by Coleman and Becker, JJ.
U.S. Bank(Logo) *VIA EMAIL***Barclays Commercial Mortgage Securities LLC 745 Seventh Avenue New York, New York 10019 Attention:  Daniel Vinson, Vice President Email: daniel.vinson@barclays.com **Annual Statement of Compliance****UBS-Barclays Commercial Mortgage Trust 2013-C6**Re: The Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement") dated as of April 1, 2013 entered into by  Barclays  Commercial  Mortgage  Securities  LLC,  as  depositor,  Midland  Loan  Services,  a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as master servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as  special  servicer,  Park  Bridge  Lender  Services  LLC,  as  operating  advisor,  and  U.S.  Bank National Association, as trustee, certificate administrator, paying agent and custodian I,  Nancie  J.  Arvin,  a  Senior  Vice  President  of  U.S.  Bank  National  Association,  as  Certificate Administrator hereby certify that:           (1) A review of the activities of the Certificate Administrator during the year ended December 31, 2014  (the  "Reporting  Period)    and  of  the  performance  of  the  Certificate  Administrator  under  the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and           (2) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Certificate Administrator has fulfilled its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.  Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings set forth in the Agreement. Date: March 13, 2015 U.S. Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator By:  _/s/ Nancie J. Arvin ___________         Nancie J. Arvin         Senior Vice President
[PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________________ No. 00-11254

________________________________ D.C. Docket No. 99-00130-CR UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RICHARD LEE BLAYLOCK, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------------------- No. 00-11255

-------------------------------- D.C. Docket No. 99-00130-CR UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ALEXANDER PETRILLO, a.k.a. Alexander Pertillo, Defendant-Appellant.

---------------------------------------------- Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama ---------------------------------------------- (Opinion May 2, 2001, 249 F.3d 1298, 11th Cir., 2001) (August 1, 2001) Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS and WILSON Circuit Judges.* B Y T H E C O U R T :2 A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that the above causes shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.

*Senior U.S. Circuit Judge Em mett R. Cox may elect to participate in further proceedings in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(c).
In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

Filed: March 14, 2017

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * UNPUBLISHED

CAROL STANLEY, *

* No. 16-1343V

Petitioner, *

v. * Special Master Gowen

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Notice of Voluntary Dismissal;

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Vaccine Rule 21(a).

*

Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS1

On March 10, 2017, petitioner filed a notice of voluntary dismissal, requesting that this 

claim be dismissed pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a). Voluntary Dismissal (ECF No. 17). In 

accordance with this rule, this case is hereby dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of the 

Court is instructed that judgment shall not enter in the instant case pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa-21(a).

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Any questions about this Order may be directed to my law clerk, Kate Burmeister, at 

(202) 357-6375 or kate_burmeister@cfc.uscourts.gov. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Thomas L. Gowen

 Thomas L. Gowen

Special Master

 

1 Because this unpublished order contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I 

intend to post it to the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the EGovernment Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended 

at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days 

to identify and move to delete medical or other information, that satisfies the criteria in § 300aa12(d)(4)(B). Further, consistent with the rule requirement, a motion for redaction must include a 

proposed redacted decision. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within the 

requirements of that provision, I will delete such material from public access.
# m8972.docx

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 2.7.2018 C(2018) 4326 final To the notifying parties: Subject : Case M.8972 - PARTNERS GROUP / CPPIB / GLOBALLOGIC Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 1 and Article 57 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area 2 Dear Sir or Madam, On 07.06.2018 , the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which Partners Group AG ("Partners Group") and Canadian Pension Plan Investment Board ( " CPPIB " ) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and Article 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the whole of GlobalLogic Holdings Limited (" GlobalLogic ") . 3 1. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are: - for Partners Group : private markets investment management, - for CPPIB : professional investment management organisation investing the assets transferred to it by the Canada Pension Plan, - for GlobalLogic : provision of software development services and related consulting to a variety of sectors. 2. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5 ( c ) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 . 4 3. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation and Article 57 of the EEA Agreement . For the Commission (Signed) Johannes LAITENBERGER Director - General
(1)
OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ( the ' Merger Regulation ' ). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( ' TFEU ' ) has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of ' Community ' by ' Union ' and ' common market ' by ' internal market ' . The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.
(2) OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3 ( the ' EEA Agreement ' ).
(3) Publication in the Official Jou rnal of the European Union No C 208 , 15.06.2018 , p. 10 .
(4)
OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5 .
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 112 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize per diem payments 

under comprehensive service programs for homeless veterans to furnish 

care to dependents of homeless veterans, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 12, 2017 

Mr. HELLER (for himself and Mrs. MURRAY) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize per 

diem payments under comprehensive service programs 

for homeless veterans to furnish care to dependents of 

homeless veterans, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Creating a Reliable 

5 Environment for Veterans’ Dependents Act’’. 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 112 IS

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF PER DIEM PAYMENTS FOR 

2 FURNISHING CARE TO DEPENDENTS OF CER3 TAIN HOMELESS VETERANS. 

4 Section 2012(a) of title 38, United States Code, is 

5 amended by adding at the end the following new para6 graph: 

7 ‘‘(4) Services for which a recipient of a grant under 

8 section 2011 of this title (or an entity described in para9 graph (1)) may receive per diem payments under this sub10 section may include furnishing care for a dependent of a 

11 homeless veteran who is under the care of such homeless 

12 veteran while such homeless veteran receives services from 

13 the grant recipient (or entity).’’. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
DENIED and Opinion Filed January 27, 2015 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 15
- 00088
- CV IN RE MICHAEL GIBB , Relator Original Proceeding from the 366th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 366
- 55837
- 2009



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Lang, Fillmore, and Brown Opinion by Justice Lang Relator requests that the Court order the trial court to vacate its order permitting real party in interest unsupervised overnight v isitation with the child who is the subject of this suit affecting the parent

- child relationship. Ordinarily, to obtain mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discre tion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co. , 148 S.W.3d 124, 135

– 36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief requested. See Walker v. Packer , 827 S.W.2d 833, 839

– 40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.8(a).

150088F.P05 / Douglas S. Lang/ DOUGLAS S. LANG JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ACRES GAMING
INCORPORATED FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       7,129,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  749,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (15,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  3,913,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,029,000
<PP&E>                                       6,219,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,717,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,476,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,345,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  4,948,000
<COMMON>                                    19,992,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (12,809,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,476,000
<SALES>                                     12,761,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,761,000
<CGS>                                        6,875,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,994,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (205,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,903,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,903,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,903,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.33)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.33)<F1>
<FN>
<F1>This information has been prepared in accordance with SFAS No. 128. Basic and
diluted EPS have been entered in place of primary and fully diluted EPS,
respectively.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
[No. 15970-1-III.

Division Three.

January 13, 1998.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Eric Aumai Tauala, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Spokane County, No. 95-1-02487-5, Robert D. Austin, J., entered June 28, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Kato, J., concurred in by Kurtz, A.C.J., and Sweeney, J.