UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-K





(Mark One)




x
ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934




For the fiscal year ended April 30, 2009


q
TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934




For the transition period from _______________________ to _______________________





COMMISSION FILE NO. 0-21255


IAS ENERGY, INC.


(Exact name of registrant in its Charter)





Oregon
91-1063549(State or Other Jurisdiction of
(I.R.S. Employerincorporation or organization)
Identification No)











240 – 11780 HAMMERSMITH WAY


RICHMOND, BRITISH COLUMBIA V7A 5E9, CANADA


(Address, including postal code, of registrant's principal executive offices)





(604) 278-5996


(Telephone number including area code)





Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: NONE





Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:




Title of each class
Name of each Exchange on which registered:Common
NASD Over the Counter Bulletin Board










Indicate by check mark if the issuer is a well- Indicate by check mark if the issuer is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act:  Yes  q  No  x






Indicate by check mark if the issuer is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act:  YesqNox







- 1 -







Indicate by check mark whether the registrant  (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days.







(1)
Yes



No

x
(2)
Yes

x

No








Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to submit and post such files).    YesxNoq







Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment
to this Form 10-K       No  q




Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filed, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.





Large accelerated filer q
Accelerated filer q
Non-accelerated filer q
Smaller reporting company x








Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).


Yes q       No x




ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS




Not applicable





APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS





The issuer’s revenues for our most recent fiscal year are:  $28,054 – Oil and Gas Revenue, $7,726 - service revenue.







The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant on September 11, 2009, computed by reference to the price at which the stock was sold on that date:  $2,198,026.60





The number of shares outstanding of the registrant's Common Stock, no par value, as of September 11, 2009 was 70,438,562, respectively.





Documents incorporated by reference: See Exhibits.

















- 2 -








IAS ENERGY, INC.





FORM – 10-K





TABLE OF CONTENTS








PART I
4ITEM 1.
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
4BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT
4BUSINESS OF THE ISSUER
4RISK FACTORS
9PATENTS, TRADEMARKS, LICENSES, FRANCHISES, CONCESSIONS, ROYALTY AGREEMENTS, LABOR CONTRACTS, INCLUDING DURATION
14RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
15NUMBEROF TOTAL EMPLOYEES AND NUMBER OF FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES
15ITEM 2.
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
15ITEM 3.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
16ITEM 4.
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
16PART II
16ITEM 5.
MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND SMALL BUSINESS ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.
16DIVIDEND POLICY
17EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
17RECENTSALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES
18ITEM 6.
MANAGEMENT’SDISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATIONS
20PLAN OF OPERATIONS
20LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
22ITEM 7.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
23ITEM 8.
CHANGESIN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
23ITEM 8A.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
23ITEM 8B.
OTHER INFORMATION
24PART III
24ITEM 9.
DIRECTORSEXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS, CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT
24ITEM 10.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
26ITEM 11.
SECURITYOWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
31ITEM 12.
CERTAINRELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
33ITEM 13.
EXHIBITS
34ITEM 14.
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
35SIGNATURES
37





- 3 -





THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K, INCLUDING EXHIBITS THERETO, CONTAINS FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS WITHIN THE MEANING OF SECTION 27A OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, AND SECTION 21E OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED. THESE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS ARE TYPICALLY IDENTIFIED BY THE WORDS "ANTICIPATES", "BELIEVES",
"EXPECTS", "INTENDS", "FORECASTS", "PLANS", "FUTURE", "STRATEGY", OR WORDS OF SIMILAR MEANING. VARIOUS FACTORS COULD CAUSE ACTUAL RESULTS TO DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THOSE EXPRESSED IN THE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS, INCLUDING THOSE DESCRIBED IN "RISK FACTORS" IN THIS FORM 10-K. WE ASSUME NO OBLIGATION TO UPDATE THESE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS TO REFLECT ACTUAL RESULTS, CHANGES IN ASSUMPTIONS, OR CHANGES IN OTHER FACTORS, EXCEPT AS REGULATED BY LAW.





PARTI





ITEM1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS





BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT





IAS Energy, Inc. (formerly IAS Communications, Inc.) (referred to herein as “the Company, IAS, us, we, our") is a development stage company incorporated in the state of Oregon in 1994. Our principal business operations are conducted in B.C. Canada and in China. Our principal business operations include the acquisition and exploration
of oil and gas interests in North America and continued development of the Video1314 website.





BUSINESS OF THE ISSUER





Oil and Gas Interests


The Company entered into an agreement dated April 6, 2005 with a private company controlled by the President of the Company to acquire a working interest in two oil wells located in Burleson County, Texas. The Company agreed to issue up to 1,000,000 shares (issued – 775,255 at April 30, 2009) of restricted common stock at the rate
of one share for every $0.10 of revenue from the wells. To April 30, 2009, revenue from the wells was approximately $58,030. During the fiscal year ended April 30, 2009, the Company received/accrued $17,878 of revenue from the wells.  The remaining 224,745 shares were issued on July 31, 2009 (Refer to Note 14(b)).  The wells are producing but a value cannot be placed on them due to vertical fracture features that prevent the estimation of reserves.





On May 4, 2006, the Company entered into an agreement with Energy Source Inc. (“ESI”) to drill up to 24 gas wells located in Kentucky. The Company can earn a 100% working interest (60% net revenue interest) in 4 gas wells by paying $185,000 per well and had the option to acquire a 100% working interest (60% net revenue interest) in an additional 20 wells over an 18 month period
at a price to be agreed upon. Each well is subject to a 12.5% net revenue interest to the land-owner and a 27.5% interest to ESI. The first three wells were paid and drilled during 2006. During the fiscal year ended April 30, 2008, the option for the additional 20 wells expired.




On May 18, 2006, the Company entered into an agreement with Teryl Resources Corp. (“Teryl”), a public company related by common directors and officers, to farm out a 40% working interest outlined above, subject to a 12.5% net revenue interest to the land-owner and a 27.5% interest to ESI, in consideration for paying 50% of the
total costs of the wells. The Company received $277,500 from Teryl during the year ended April 30, 2007, representing 50% of the cost of drilling the first, second and third wells.





- 4 -







On September 28, 2006, the Company assigned a 20% working interest (12% net revenue interest) in the third well drilled, as part of a private placement, to three related parties pursuant to private placement subscription agreements, leaving the Company with a 40% working interest (24% net revenue interest).





Due to the difficulty of obtaining an independent reserve report due to the vertical fracture of the wells, the total cost of $nil (2008 - $273,426) was impaired and charged to operations during the period ended April 30, 2009.





Video1314 Option Agreement





On October 23, 2007 we entered into a letter of intent (“LOI”) with each of the two shareholders of Power Telecom Limited (“Power Telecom”), a company incorporated in Hong Kong, to acquire up to a 100% interest in Power Telecom, which owns a 100% beneficial interest in www.video1314.com (“Video 1314”)
a Chinese Web 2.0 platform similar to YouTube (www.youtube.com).





Video1314 is a fast growing Chinese Web 2.0 platform (similar to www.youtube.com) that allows users to share videos, music, and audio as well as sell goods and services using videos in its marketplace. Since its launch, Video1314 has attracted millions of users and is fast becoming one of Asia’s top Web2.0 destinations. Video1314
currently serves the Greater China region, which includes mainland China, Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan. The features of the site are focused on free online photo, video and audio sharing; a marketplace to buy and sell goods using video, photo and audio technologies; and online educational gaming.





We received a formal business plan for Video1314 and our representatives, having full access to Power Telecom’s business in order to assess our potential acquisition of Power Telecom, completed our due diligence.





On November 26, 2007 we entered into an option agreement (“Option Agreement”) with each of the two shareholders of Power Telecom Limited, (Mr. Samuel Kam [“Kam”] and Biotonus Clinique Bon Port (Hong Kong) Limited [“Biotonus”]; together Kam and Biotonus shall be referred to as the “Vendors”)
and Power Telecom Limited, to acquire up to a 100% interest in Power Telecom.





Pursuant to the Option Agreement, the Vendors granted the Company a series of irrevocable exclusive options to purchase up to 100% of the shares of Power Telecom. If all the options are exercised, the Company could issue up to 50 million shares of common stock of the Company in exchange for up to all outstanding shares of Power Telecom
held by the Vendors. Additionally, the Company may invest up to an aggregate of $650,000 cash in Power Telecom as a capital contribution. On October 23, 2007, pursuant to the LOI, we paid Power Telecom the sum of $50,000 which was applied towards the $650,000 aggregate capital contribution.





The Company has received a series of options only to purchase the shares of Power Telecom and is under no obligation to exercise the options in whole or in part. If the Company elects only to exercise one or some of the series of options granted thereunder, it will retain the percentage of Power Telecom that it has already purchased.





The Company may also issue up to five million shares of common stock of the Company to Ramon Mabanta as a finder’s fee if all the options to purchase up to 100% of the shares of Power Telecom are exercised. Such finder’s fee shares shall be subject to a lock-up agreement.





On November 26, 2007 we exercised the first option, made a payment of $50,000, issued 10 million shares of our common stock to the Vendors, and earned a 20% interest in Power Telecom. Additionally, we issued one million shares of our common stock to Ramon Mabanta as a finder’s fee.





On March 5, 2008, we exercised the second option, made a payment of $100,000, and issued 10,000,000 common shares to acquire a further 20% interest in Power Telecom for a total holding of 40%.





- 5 -





Additionally, we issued one million shares of our common stock to Ramon Mabanta as a finder’s fee. The due date of the issuance of shares for the third option was extended to August 15, 2008.





Effective September 3, 2008, we completed the exercise of the third option, made a payment of $150,000, and issued 10,000,000 common shares to acquire a further 20% interest in Power Telecom for a total holding of 60%. Additionally, we issued one million shares of our common stock to Ramon Mabanta as a finder’s fee.





The Company does not intend to exercise any further options to acquire any further interest in Power Telecomm.





Progress and Development of Video1314





In December 2007, the fiber optic backbone capacity was upgraded from 100Mbps to 1000Mbps in Hong Kong, which is equivalent to twenty-two T3 lines. This added capacity and connection to the Internet would allow Video1314 to have the capacity to sustain over 30 million hits to its site per day. Traffic on its web site for the month of January
2008, registered more than 10 million hits, reflecting growing interest in the site's ability to offer video, photo and audio sharing experiences to its users. The activity in January represented a 300% increase compared to 4 million hits recorded in November 2007.





On June 16, 2008 we announced that video1314.com had entered into a partnership and cross-marketing agreement with Queen Productions Limited, a leading Chinese Artist management, music and film production company.  We believe this partnership will significantly increase the activity on our site and anticipate enhanced commercial
activities. Queen Products represents many popular Chinese entertainers, and we hope its relationships may expand the audience for Video1314.com at a time when we have made significant enhancements to improve its functionality and content.





Under this agreement Video1314.com's site will be promoted by Queen Production's Artistes at public events, venues, in print material and in music and film publications. In exchange, Queen Productions has engaged Video1314 to exclusively promote on the Internet, their Artists, music and films via Video1314.com's site.





In conjunction with the agreement, Video1314.com will exclusively debut the music single and video of Cindy Lee Si Nga. Si Nga is one of Queen Productions' new and upcoming star artists and is a professional athlete, actress, sports anchor and singer. She appeared on television during the Beijing 2008 Olympics as one of TVB's Olympic sports
anchors. She will also be Video1314's ambassador at various public events.





On July 7, 2008 we announced that video1314.com had record web site traffic with over 14.3 million monthly hits to its site in June, 2008. We are now averaging more than half a million clicks to our site each day and expect this to increase substantially in the coming months through the introduction of more user-friendly interfaces in the
future.





In September 2008, the board of directors of IAS Energy appointed Samuel Kam as Chairman of IAS Energy, Inc.  Additionally, during the week of September 22, 2008, Video1314.com received a record 934,147 hits to its web site in a single day, which is close to the goal of 1,000,000 hits per day.





During January 2009, Video1314.com received record web site traffic with over 23 million monthly hits to its site.  The previous report announced 14.3 million hits in June 2008.  Even though we are seeing a slowdown in the global and Asian economies, our website traffic continues to grow substantially.  We
are now averaging close to a million clicks to our site each day and with the added traffic, we anticipate more revenue opportunities to arise.





In April 2009, we announced a record number of users are logging on to the Video 1314 website. The Company recorded 45,462,333 hits for the month of March 2009, compared to the February 2009 figures of 28,352 362 - an impressive increase of 60%, and over 1000% increase since November 2007.





- 6 -











Video1314.com Traffic GrowthPageviews


HitsNov-07


1,307,826



4,282,610Dec-07


1,748,905



6,060,487Jan-08


2,435,476



10,117,685Feb-08


2,598,229



11,450,293Mar-08


2,601,568



10,475,886Apr-08


2,680,890



10,568,581May-08


3,280,898



12,923,705Jun-08


3,508,593



14,339,012Jul-08


3,338,879



13,643,764Aug-08


3,115,257



12,173,271Sep-08


3,891,064



16,688,314Oct-08


3,575,341



13,885,588Nov-08


3,273,213



13,479,472Dec-08


3,648,150



13,594,012Jan-09


3,156,214



22,682,711Feb-09


5,509,075



28,352,362Mar-09


11,456,040



45,462,333








Video1314.com users come from these countries:China


52.70%Hong Kong


28.30%Taiwan


8.30%Canada


4.70%United States


3.20%Macao


1.30%Other countries


1.40%





We anticipate this increase should assist us in generating advertising revenue.





In April 2009, Video1314.com partnered with China Outdoor Media Group, a Hong Kong public company. (SEHK: 254) to post top rated Video1314.com's media clips on up to 4,000 displays in China Post outlets in Guangdong province, southern China. In the future, the display of the media clips will gradually be expanded to be displayed throughout
China Post's 60,000 outlets. China Post is China's postal system that has over 60,000 postal outlets, is one of the largest savings banks in China and has this exclusive media relationship with China Outdoor Media Group.





Video1314.com will also display China Outdoor Media Group's exclusively produced content such as travel programs, fortune telling programs and celebrity interviews on Video1314.com's platform. The produced content can be exclusively viewed by millions of Video1314.com users throughout Asia. In this partnership, China Outdoor Media Group's
subsidiary, China New Media Company Ltd. will also be appointed as Video1314.com's advertising agent. China New Media Company Ltd. will seek advertisers to place advertising and increase monetization for Video1314.com's site. In addition, Video1314.com's top rated media clips will be supplied to China New Media Company Ltd. to be displayed on their digital display panels located in over 100 locations throughout Hong Kong at Japan Home Centre outlets.




Management believes this is a good opportunity to create brand awareness for Video1314.com as we are able to tap into China Outdoor Media's network as well as China Post's 60,000 outlets. We have decided not to exercise any further options any further interest in Power Telecom.





- 7 -







Competition






Oil and Gas


The strength of commodity prices has resulted in significantly increased operating cash flows and has led to increased drilling activity. This industry activity has increased competition for undeveloped lands; skilled personnel; access to drilling rigs, service rigs and other equipment; and access to processing and gathering facilities,
all of which may cause drilling and operating costs to increase. Most of our competitors are larger than us and have substantially greater financial and marketing resources. In addition, some of our competitors may be able to secure products and services from vendors on more favorable terms, offer a greater product selection, and adopt more aggressive pricing policies than we can.






Video 1314


With the investment and our ownership in Video 1314, we operate in the Internet products, services, and content markets, which are highly competitive and characterized by rapid change, converging technologies, and increasing competition from companies offering communication, information, and entertainment services integrated into other
products and media properties.






We compete for users and advertisers with many other providers of online services. The principal competitive factors relating to attracting and retaining users include the usefulness, accessibility, reach, integration, and personalization of the online services that we offer, and the overall user experience.






The most significant competition is from Baidu, Alibaba, Yahoo! China, Google China, Tudou and Youku.






In this Chinese market, we also compete with local portals that are predominantly supported by local telecommunication providers or local providers of specific locally designed and marketed Internet services, some of which may have a potential competitive advantage due to an existing direct billing relationship with their users.






Material effects of Government Regulation




Oil and Gas


The oil and natural gas industry is subject to extensive controls and regulations imposed by various levels of government. We do not expect that any of these controls or regulations will affect our operations in a manner materially different than they would affect other oil and gas industry participants of similar size.






Video 1314


Our business interest and operations in Power Telecom and Video 1314 are conducted in China. China's economy differs from the economies of most developed countries in many respects, including the amount of government involvement, level of development, growth rate, control of foreign exchange, and allocation of resources. The Chinese government
has implemented various measures to encourage economic development and guide the allocation of resources. Some of these measures benefit the overall Chinese economy, but may also have a negative effect on us. For example, we may be adversely affected by government control over video sharing and the Internet.  In December 2007, the Chinese Government issued new rules which held that in order to operate, video-sharing sites must be part state-owned. Regulators later issued guidance that some privately
run sites may continue if they were given licenses and agreed to abide by content restrictions.  Such measures may cause a decrease in the level of activity in media sharing web sites in China, which in turn could adversely affect us.




Past Activities of Our Company
  
 Until fiscal 2002, we were engaged in the commercialization of advanced antenna technology known as the Contrawound Toroidal Helical Antenna, (the "CTHA"), for wireless communications markets. Since then, The CTHA technology has been on hold due to unsuccessful attempts to complete a license agreement with potential customers.





- 8 -








RISK FACTORS





You should carefully consider the following risks and the other information in this Report and our other filings with the SEC before you decide to invest in us or to maintain or increase your investment.





The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties may also adversely impact and impair our business. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, results of operations, or financial condition would likely suffer. In such case, the trading price of our common stock
could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.





BUSINESS RISKS





We are a developmental stage company and have suffered recurring operating losses.





We were incorporated in Oregon on December 13, 1994.  We are a development stage company. In a development stage company, management devotes most of its activities to establishing a new business. Planned principal activities have not yet produced significant revenues and we have suffered recurring operating losses as is normal
in development stage companies. The Company had oil and gas revenue of $28,054 during the year ended April 30, 2009, but it is not likely that we will be able to generate sufficient revenue in the future. We also had a working capital deficiency of $1,659,081 as at April 30, 2009, which our auditors have stated raises substantial concern on our ability to meet planned business objectives and ongoing operations for the next twelve months. Our ability to emerge from the development stage with respect to our planned
principal business activities is dependent upon our successful efforts to raise additional equity financing, or receive funding from affiliates and controlling shareholders.





We have and will continue to have a need for additional financing.





We have experienced significant working capital deficiencies and negative cash flows in the past. Our ability to continue in business depends upon our continued ability to obtain working capital. There can be no assurance that any such financing would be available upon terms and conditions acceptable to us, if at all.  The inability
to obtain additional financing in a sufficient amount when needed, and upon acceptable terms and conditions could have a material adverse effect upon us. If additional funds are raised by issuing equity securities, further dilution to existing or future shareholders is likely to result.





We are controlled by current insiders and affiliates of the Company.





Approximately 55,000,000 common shares, not including currently exercisable options or warrants, are owned by current affiliates and insiders representing control of approximately 77.71% of the total voting power, with 28.61% to be voted specifically for the election of directors by the shareholders of Power Telecom.





As we continue to expand our business purposes, we may require additional key personnel.





At the present, the Company employs no full time employees. The success of the Company's business will depend, in part, upon the ability to attract and retain qualified employees. The Company believes that it will be able to attract competent employees, but no assurance can be given that the Company will be successful in this regard. If
the Company is unable to engage and retain the necessary personnel, its business may be materially and adversely affected.




We are uncertain of our ability to manage growth.
 
 Our ability to achieve our planned growth is dependent upon a number of factors including our ability to hire, train and assimilate management and other contractors or employees, the adequacy of our financial resources, our ability to identify and efficiently provide such new products and services as our customers may require in the future
and our ability to adapt our own systems to accommodate expanded operations. In addition, there can be no assurance that we will be able to achieve our planned expansion in oil and gas





- 9 -





exploration and Video1314 or that we will be able to manage such expanded operations successfully. Failure to manage anticipated growth effectively and efficiently could have a material adverse effect on us.





Our present management devotes part-time attention to the Company which may result in conflicts of interest.





The present officers and directors of the Company have other full-time positions or part-time employment which is unrelated to the Company. Some officers and directors will be available to participate in management decisions on a part-time or as-needed basis only. Management of the Company may devote time to other companies or projects
which may compete directly or indirectly with the Company (see “Directors and Officers” herein).





Indemnification of officers and directors for securities liabilities.





The Bylaws of the Company provide that the Company may indemnify any Director, Officer, agent and/or employee as to those liabilities and on those terms and conditions as are specified in the Oregon Business Corpo­ration Act. Further, the Company may purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of any such persons whether or not the Company
would have the power to indemnify such person against the liability insured against. The foregoing could result in substantial expenditures by the Company and prevent any recovery from such Officers, Directors, agents and employees for losses incurred by the Company as a result of their actions. Further, the Company has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission, indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the 1933 Act and is therefore, unenforceable (See "Indemnification"herein).





General Factors.





The Company's areas of business may be affected from time to time by such matters as changes in general economic conditions, changes in laws and regulations, taxes, tax laws, prices and costs, and other factors of a general nature which may have an adverse effect on the Company's business (See "Business" herein).





Cumulative Voting, Preemptive Rights and Control.





There are no preemptive rights in connection with the Shares of Common Stock. Shareholders may be diluted in their percentage ownership of the Company in the event additional shares are issued by the Company in the future. Cumulative voting in the election of directors is not permitted. Accordingly, the holders of a majority of the shares
of Common Stock present in person or by proxy will be able to elect all of the Company's Board of Directors.





Regulatory developments may result in increased costs.





We are subject to securities regulation in the jurisdictions in which we operate. We may incur increased costs for expenses necessary to comply with existing and newly adopted laws and regulations or penalties for any failure to comply.





RISKS SPECIFIC TO THE OIL AND GAS INDUSTRY




The potential profitability of oil and gas ventures depends upon factors beyond the control of our Company.
 
 The potential profitability of oil and gas properties is dependent upon many factors beyond our control. For instance, world prices and markets for oil and gas are unpredictable, highly volatile, potentially subject to governmental fixing, pegging, controls,
or any combination of these and other factors, and respond to changes in domestic, international, political, social, and economic environments. Additionally, due to worldwide economic uncertainty, the availability and cost of funds for production and other expenses have become increasingly difficult, if not impossible, to project. In addition, adverse weather conditions and availability of drilling equipment can also hinder drilling operations. These changes and events may materially affect our financial performance.
These factors cannot be accurately predicted and the combination of these factors may result in our Company not receiving an adequate return on invested capital.





- 10 -







There can be no assurance our wells will become profitable.





Our wells may not become productive wells, and even if they do, they may become uneconomic in the event water or other deleterious substances are encountered which impair or prevent the production of oil and/or gas from the well. In addition, production from any well may be unmarketable if it is impregnated with water or other deleterious
substances. Also, the marketability of oil and gas which we may acquire or discover will be affected by numerous factors, including the proximity and capacity of oil and gas pipelines and processing equipment, market fluctuations of prices, taxes, royalties, land tenure, allowable production and environmental protection, all of which could result in greater expenses than revenue generated by the well.





Exploration for economic reserves of oil and gas is subject to a number of risk factors.





Few properties that are explored are ultimately developed into producing oil and/or gas wells. Our properties are in the exploration and development stage only and are without proven reserves of oil and gas. We may not establish commercial discoveries on any of our properties.





Competition in the oil and gas industry is highly competitive and there is no assurance that we will be successful in acquiring the leases.





The oil and gas industry is intensely competitive. We compete with numerous individuals and companies, including many major oil and gas companies, which have substantially greater technical, financial and operational resources and staffs. Accordingly, there is a high degree of competition for desirable oil and gas leases, suitable properties
for drilling operations and necessary drilling equipment, as well as for access to funds. We cannot predict if the necessary funds can be raised or that any projected work will be completed.





The marketability of natural resources will be affected by numerous factors beyond our control which may result in us not receiving an adequate return on invested capital to be profitable or viable.





The marketability of natural resources which we may acquire or discover will be affected by numerous factors beyond our control. These factors include market fluctuations in oil and gas pricing and demand, the proximity and capacity of natural resource markets and processing equipment, governmental regulations, land tenure, land use, regulation
concerning the importing and exporting of oil and gas and environmental protection regulations. The exact effect of these factors cannot be accurately predicted, but the combination of these factors may result in us not receiving an adequate return on invested capital to be profitable or viable.





Oil and gas operations are subject to comprehensive regulation which may cause substantial delays or require capital outlays in excess of those anticipated causing an adverse effect on our Company.





Oil and gas operations are subject to federal, state, and local laws relating to the protection of the environment, including laws regulating removal of natural resources from the ground and the discharge of materials into the environment. Oil and gas operations are also subject to federal, state, and local laws and regulations which seek
to maintain health and safety standards by regulating the design and use of drilling methods and equipment. Various permits from government bodies may be required for drilling operations to be conducted; we can give no assurance that we will receive such permits. Environmental standards imposed by federal, provincial, or local authorities may be changed and any such changes may have material adverse effects on our activities. Moreover, compliance with such laws may cause substantial delays or require capital
outlays in excess of those anticipated, thus causing an adverse effect on us.  Additionally, we may be subject to liability for pollution or other environmental damages. To date we have not been required to spend any material amount on compliance with environmental regulations.  However, we may be required to do so in future and this may affect our ability to expand or maintain our operations.





- 11 -








RISKS RELATED TO VIDEO SHARING AND THE INTERNET





Our business depends on the continued growth and maintenance of the Internet infrastructure.





The success and the availability of our Internet-based products and services depends in part upon the continued growth and maintenance of the Internet infrastructure itself, including its protocols, architecture, network backbone, data capacity and security. Spam, viruses, worms, spyware, denial of service attacks, phishing, and other acts
of malice may affect not only the Internet’s speed, reliability and availability but also its continued desirability as a vehicle for commerce, information and user engagement. If the Internet proves unable to meet the new threats and increased demands placed upon it, our business plans, user and advertiser relationships, site traffic and revenues, if any, could be adversely affected.





We face significant competition from large-scale Chinese Internet content, product and service aggregators, includingBaidu, Alibaba, Yahoo! China, Google China, Tudou and Youku.





We face significant competition from companies, principally Baidu, Alibaba, Yahoo! China, Google China, Tudou and Youku that have aggregated a variety of Internet products, services and content in a manner similar to Video 1314. The principal competitive factors relating to attracting and retaining users include the usefulness, accessibility,
reach, integration, and personalization of the online services that we offer, the quality and relevance of our search results, and the overall user experience. In this Chinese market, we also compete with local portals that are predominantly supported by local telecommunication providers or local providers of specific locally designed and marketed Internet services, some of which may have a potential competitive advantage due to an existing direct billing relationship with their users. If our competitors are
more successful than we are in developing compelling products or attracting and retaining users, advertisers, or publishers, then our revenues, if any, and growth rates could decline.





RISKS RELATED TO DOING BUSINESS IN CHINA





Adverse changes in economic and political policies of the Chinese government could have a material adverse effect on the overall economic growth of China, which could adversely affect our business.




Substantially all of our business operations are conducted in China. Accordingly, our results of operations, financial condition and prospects are subject to a significant degree to economic, political and legal developments in China. China's economy differs from the economies of most developed countries in many respects, including the
amount of government involvement, level of development, growth rate, control of foreign exchange and allocation of resources. While the Chinese economy has experienced significant growth in the past 20 years, growth has been uneven across different regions and among various economic sectors of China. The Chinese government has implemented various measures to encourage economic development and guide the allocation of resources. Some of these measures benefit the overall Chinese economy, but may also have a negative
effect on us. For example, we may be adversely affected by government control over internet and on-line entertainment and services. In December 2007, the Chinese Government issued new rules which held that in order to operate, video-sharing sites must be part state-owned. Regulators later issued guidance that some privately run sites may continue if they were given licenses and agreed to abide by content restrictions. Such measures could adversely affect us.




Our Chinese operations are subject to increased risks which could harm our business, operating results and financial condition.







In addition to uncertainty about our ability to generate revenues from our Chinese operations and expand our international market position, there are certain risks inherent in doing business in China, including:





§difficulties in developing, staffing and simultaneously managing a number of varying foreign operations as a result of distance, language, and cultural differences;§stringent local labor laws and regulations;§political or social unrest or economic instability;   
  §risks related to government regulation or required compliance with local laws in certain jurisdictions, including those more fully described above; and§potentially adverse tax consequences.





One or more of these factors could harm our future international operations and consequently, could harm our brand, business, operating results, and financial condition.








RISKS RELATED TO OUR SECURITIES





You will be subject to the penny stock rules to the extent our stock price on the OTC Bulletin Board is less than $5.00.





Since the common shares are not listed on a national stock exchange or quoted on the NASDAQ Market within the United States, trading in the common shares on the OTC Electronic Bulletin Board is subject, to the extent the market price for the common shares is less than $5.00 per share, to a number of regulations known as the "penny
stock rules".  The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document prepared by the SEC, to provide the customer with additional information including current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction, monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer's account, and to make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable
investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser's written agreement to the transaction.  To the extent these requirements may be applicable they will reduce the level of trading activity in the secondary market for the common shares and may severely and adversely affect the ability of broker-dealers to sell the common shares.





Future sales of shares may adversely impact the value of our stock.





We will seek to raise additional capital through the sale of our common stock. Future sales of our common stock could cause the market price of our common stock to decline.





Because of the limited market for our shares, share prices may be highly volatile.





The market prices of equity securities of small companies have experienced extreme price volatility in recent years not necessarily related to the individual performance of specific companies. Factors such as announcements by us or our competitors concerning products, technology, governmental regulatory actions, other events affecting oil
and gas companies generally and general market conditions may have a significant impact on the market price of our shares and could cause it to fluctuate substantially. At present, only a limited public market exists for the Common Stock on the OTC Bulletin Board maintained by the National Association of Securities Dealers and there is no assurance that a more active trading market will develop, or, if developed, that it will be sustained.  A shareholder of our common shares may, therefore, find it
difficult to resell their common shares should he or she desires to do so.





Dilution.





Sales of additional equity securities may dilute, on a pro rata basis, the value of our common shares.  The grant and exercise of warrants or stock options would also likely result in a dilution of the value of our common shares.  In addition, we may grant additional stock options or other forms of equity-based incentive
compensation to attract and retain personnel.  We also may in the future offer equity participation in connection with the obtaining of non-equity financing, such as debt or leasing arrangements accompanied by warrants to purchase our equity securities. Any of these actions could dilute the value of our common shares.




The resale by the two sole shareholders of Power Telecom (“Vendors”) of the common stock that it acquires from us will increase the number of our publicly traded shares, which could depress the market





- 13 -





price of our common stock.  The issuance of shares to the Vendors will therefore dilute the equity interest of existing stockholders and could have an adverse effect on the market price of our common stock.





The perceived risk of dilution may cause our stockholders to sell their shares, which would contribute to a downward movement in the stock price of our common stock.  Moreover, the perceived risk of dilution and the resulting downward pressure on our stock price could encourage investors to engage in short sales of our common
stock.  By increasing the number of shares offered for sale, material amounts of short selling could further contribute to progressive price declines in our common stock.





Restrictions on Transferability




A substantial number of the Company’s presently outstanding shares of Common Stock, are "restricted" securities and, may be sold in compliance with Rule 144 adopted under the 1933 Act or Regulation S if certain requirements are met.  Rule 144 provides, in essence, that after six months from the date of acquisition, a person,
including affiliates, of the Company are allowed unlimited public resales under Rule 144 provided that current public information about the Company is available. After one year, a non-affiliate is allowed unlimited public resales under Rule 144 and need not comply with any other Rule 144 requirements. After the six-month holding period, affiliates may resell in accordance with all Rule 144 requirements, which include: the provision for current public information about the Company; volume limitations; manner of
sale requirements for equity securities; and filing of Form 144.




Investors should be aware of the possibility that sales under Rule 144 or shares issued pursuant to Regulations S may, in the future, have a depressing effect on the price of the shares of Company's common stock.





Dividend Policy





As of the date of this Form 10-KSB, we have not paid any dividends on our common stock and we do not expect to declare or pay any dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future.





We have not adopted any anti-takeover provisions.





At the present time, our Board of Directors has not adopted any shareholder rights plan or any anti-takeover provisions in our Charter or Bylaws.





Our securities are subject to the requirements of the SEC with regard to low-priced securities.





The Company's securities are subject to Rule 15g-9 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which imposes additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell such securities to persons other than established customers and "accredited investors" (generally, individuals with net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or
annual incomes exceeding $200,000, or $300,000 together with their spouses). For transactions covered by this rule, a broker-dealer must make a special suitability determination for the purchaser and have received the purchaser's written consent to the transaction prior to sale. Consequently, the rule may adversely affect the ability of broker-dealers to sell the Company’s securities and may adversely affect the ability of shareholders to sell their shares in the secondary market.








PATENTS, TRADEMARKS, LICENSES, FRANCHISES, CONCESSIONS, ROYALTY AGREEMENTS, LABOR CONTRACTS, INCLUDING DURATION







By sublicense agreements dated July 10, 1995, the Company was granted an exclusive worldwide sublicense by Integral Concepts Inc. (“ICI”) and West Virginia University Research Corporation (“WVURC”) to the Contrawound Toroidal Helical Antenna (“CTHA”) technology, excluding all military and governmental
applications and resulting procurement interests. On March 17, 2005, the Company entered into settlement and release agreements with each of ICI and WVURC to terminate the July 10, 1995 agreements. Accordingly, the Company was released from all previously accrued royalty fees.





- 14 -







On March 17, 2005, the Company entered into a non-exclusive license agreement with WVURC for the development, manufacture, use and sale of the CTHA technology. The agreement was retroactively effective on January 15, 2005. The terms of the non-exclusive sublicense agreement are as follows:




(i)
The Company will pay a license fee of $3,000 for each calendar year, payable on or before January 15 of each year (paid).




(ii)
The Company will pay a royalty 10% of net sales.




(iii)
The Company will pay a royalty of 50% of all other sublicense revenues.





All royalties in items (ii) and (iii) are payable within 30 days of each calendar quarter. The terms of the agreement remain in effect until the expiration of the last patent to expire that is included in the CTHA technology.





RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT





We spent $2,000 in 2009 on research and development as compared to $3,000 in 2008.  Research and development is required to keep the Non-Exclusive License Agreement with WVURC regarding the CTHA technology license in good standing.








NUMBER OF TOTAL EMPLOYEES AND NUMBER OF FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES





We currently employ no full-time employees and utilize contractors as required.





ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY





Our executive offices are located at #240-11780 Hammersmith Way, Richmond, British Columbia V7A 5E9, and the telephone number is (604) 278-5996. We share this office space with companies with related directors and officers. The Company occupied this space rent-free during the fiscal year.





Oil and Gas Properties





Refer to Item 1. Business of the Company for further information on our oil and gas properties.





The Company entered into an agreement dated April 6, 2005 with a private company controlled by the President of the Company to acquire a working interest in two oil wells located in Burleson County, Texas. The Company agreed to issue up to 1,000,000 shares (issued – 775,255) of restricted common stock at the rate of one share for
every $0.10 of revenue from the wells. The wells are producing but a value cannot be placed on them due to vertical fracture features that prevent the estimation of reserves.





On April 7, 2008, the Company entered into an agreement to dispose of its interest in the three Kentucky gas wells to Teryl Resources Corp.  In consideration, the Company received a deposit of $25,000 with the balance to be determined following the preparation of an independent valuation report by a qualified petroleum geologist.
All revenues from these wells will be received by Teryl upon execution of this agreement.  Subsequent to year-end, both parties agreed to indefinitely suspend the agreement due to the difficulty of obtaining an independent valuation report due to the vertical fracture of the wells. As such, the $25,000 paid to the Company is due to Teryl.





Exploratory and Development Wells Drilled





We have participated in the drilling of several wells during the last three fiscal years.




In June 2006, the Ken Lee #1 well was successfully completed as a commercial gas well. The initial open flow tested 1.22 MCF of high BTU gas. The well was completed to a depth of 1410' in the Big Lime formation. In July 2006, we commenced the drilling of the Elvis Farris #2 well, located on the Farris Lease, in Laurel County, Kentucky.  On
November 1, 2006 we announced that the Clarence Bright #1 well in Laurel County, Kentucky is completed. The total depth on the well was 1742 feet with two production







- 15 -







zones, one in the Big Lime @ 1240 to 1250 and one in Waverly @ 1252 to 1260. The open flow was 747 MCF with 230 PSI.






The two producing wells located in Burleson County, Texas are producing but a value cannot be placed on them due to vertical fracture features that prevent the estimation of reserves.






Miscellaneous






We are not obligated to provide quantities of oil or gas in the future under existing contracts or agreements. We have not filed any reports containing oil or gas reserve estimates with any federal or foreign governmental authority or agency within the past 12 months.




ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS





To the best of the knowledge of our Officers and Directors, neither the Company nor any of our Officers and Directors is party to any material legal proceeding or litigation other than as described below. Further, our Officers and Directors know of no threatened or contemplated legal proceedings or litigation other than as described below.
None of our Officers and Directors has been convicted of a felony and none has been convicted of any criminal offense, felony or misdemeanor, relating to securities or performance in corporate office. To the best of the knowledge of our Officers and Directors, no investigations of felonies, misfeasance in office or securities investigations are either pending or threatened at the present time.







ITEM4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS





N/A





PARTII





ITEM5.
MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND SMALL BUSINESS ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.





Our Common Stock trades on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol "IASCA.OB" where it has traded since April 16, 1996. Our Common Stock has traded at between $0.010 and $4.62 per share since April 16, 1996.





The following table sets forth the high and low prices for the Company's Common Stock, as reported by Nasdaq Trading & Market Services for the quarters presented. These quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commissions, and may not reflect actual transactions.





Bid Price*


Asked Price*High $


Low $


High $


Low $Quarter Ended July 31, 2007


0.53



0.15



0.56



0.18Quarter Ended October 31, 2007


1.10



0.23



1.11



0.24Quarter Ended January 31, 2008


1.36



0.35



1.37



0.37Quarter Ended April 30, 2008


0.39



0.20



0.40



0.24Quarter Ended July 31, 2008


0.25



0.16



0.35



0.2Quarter Ended October 31, 2008


0.27



0.08



0.30



0.10Quarter Ended January 31, 2009


0.085



0.02



0.12



0.021Quarter Ended April 30, 2009


0.26



0.02



0.28



0.03




_________


* All prices are in U.S. dollars.





(Information provided by The Over The Counter Bulletin Board.  The quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, markdown, or commission and may not represent actual transactions.)





- 16 -





As of September 11, 2009 there were 70,438,562 shares of Common Stock outstanding, held by 145 shareholders of record.





The following table shows the high and low closing bid prices of our stock traded on the OTC Bulletin Board during the most recent six months, for each month as follows:





Bid PriceMonth

High $*


Low $*2009, August


0.18



0.112009, July


0.185



0.102009, June


0.25



0.102009, May


0.27



0.102009, April


0.26



0.042009, March


0.07



0.0452009, February


0.045



0.02




_________


* All prices are in U.S. dollars.





(Information provided by the Over The Counter Bulletin Board.  The quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, markdown, or commission and may not represent actual transactions.)








DIVIDENDPOLICY





To date we have not paid any dividends on our Common Stock and do not expect to declare or pay any dividends on such Common Stock in the foreseeable future. Payment of any dividends will be dependent upon future earnings, if any, our financial condition, and other factors as deemed relevant by our Board of Directors.





EQUITYCOMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION





The following table sets forth information about our common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options, warrants and rights under all of our equity compensation plans as of April 30, 2009.





Plan Category

Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights


Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (3)(4)


Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plansEquity compensation plans approved by security holders:§1999 Amended Stock Option Plan (1) and 2007 Stock Option Plan (2)


2,375,000


$
0.28



2,125,000Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders


N/A



N/A



N/A





(1)
The Company has a Stock Option Plan to issue up to 2,500,000 shares to certain key directors and employees, approved and registered October 2, 1996, and amended, the “1999 Amended Plan” as approved by the board of direction on May 28, 1999. Pursuant to the 1999 Amended Plan, the Company has granted stock options to certain directors and employees.





- 17 -





(2)
The Company has a further Stock Option Plan to issue up to a further 2,000,000 shares to certain key directors and employees, the “2007 Plan” as approved by the board of direction on October 22, 2007. Pursuant to the 2007 Plan, the Company has granted stock options to certain directors and employees.





(3)
The price reflects the weighted average exercise price of those options which are vested and exercisable.





(4)
The weighted average exercise price of those options which are exercisable (987,500 options) is $0.32.







The Company has a Stock Option Plan to issue up to 2,500,000 Class “A” common shares to certain key directors and employees, approved and registered October 2, 1996, as amended (the “1999 Amended Plan”). Pursuant to the 1999 Amended Plan, the Company has granted stock options to certain directors and employees and
registered them on Form S-8 with the Securities and Exchange Commission.




On October 22, 2007, the Company approved the 2007 Stock Option Plan (the “2007 Plan”) to issue up to 2,000,000 Class “A” common shares to directors and employees and registered them on Form S-8 with the Securities and Exchange Commission.







All options granted by the Company under the 1999 Amended Plan have the following vesting schedule:




These options vest as follows:




(i)
25% of the options vest upon granting of the option; such initial exercise is referred to as the “First Vesting”;




(ii)
The second 25% of the options vest 90 days from the date of exercise of the First Vesting; such second vesting is referred to as the “Second Vesting”;




(iii)
The third 25% of the options vest 90 days from the date of the exercise of Second Vesting; such third vesting is referred to as the “Third Vesting”;




(iv)
The fourth and final 25% of the options vest 90 days from the date of exercise of the Third Vesting; and.




(v)
The options expire 60 months from the date of grant.





During the fiscal year ended April 30, 2008, the Company granted 1,000,000 options in accordance with the terms of the Power Telecom Option Agreement.  These options were granted under the 2007 Plan and have the following vesting schedule:




(i)
12.5% of the options vest on the day that the Company issues ten million of its shares to Power Telecom as per the option agreement. Refer to Note 3.




(ii)
Every 90 days thereafter, an additional 12.5% of the grant shall vest; and




(iii)
The options expire 60 months from the date of grant.








RECENTSALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES





Set forth below is information regarding the issuance and sales of our securities without registration during the past fiscal year. No such sales involved an underwriter and no commissions were paid in connection with the sale of any securities, except as specified below.  See the Statement of Stockholders’ Equity and the
Notes to our audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2009 for more information on recent sales of unregistered securities.





(a)
During the year ended April 30, 2009, the Company issued 50,000 Class A common shares at $0.05 per share upon the exercise of stock options for proceeds of $2,500.





- 18 -








(b)
On 5 September 2008, the Company issued 100,000 units at $0.20 per unit pursuant to a private placement for cash proceeds of $20,000, received during the three month period ended 31 July 2008.  Each unit consists of one Class A common share and one share purchase warrant.  Each warrant enables the holder to purchase one additional share at an exercise price of $0.25 per share for one year, expiring
on 5 September, 2009.





(c)
On 30 July 2008, in accordance with the terms of the option agreement as described in Note 3, the Company issued 10,000,000 Class A common shares to acquire 20% of Power Telecom. In addition, 1,000,000 Class A common shares were issued as a finder’s fee. The fair value of the total shares issued is $2,197,001.





(d)
On 21 July 2008, the Company issued 495,778 Class A common shares to a private company controlled by the President of the Company to fulfill its obligation per agreement, as described in Note 11(a).





(e)
On 28 May 2008, the Company issued 10,000 units at $0.40 per unit pursuant to a private placement for cash proceeds of $4,000, received during the April 30, 2008 year end.  Each unit consists of one Class A common share and one share purchase warrant.  Each warrant enables the holder to purchase one additional Class A common share at an exercise price of $0.50 per share for one year, expiring
28 May 2009.





(f)
On 5 March 2008, in accordance with the terms of the option agreement as described in Note 3, the Company issued 10,000,000 Class A common shares to acquire 20% of Power Telecom. In addition, 1,000,000 Class A common shares were issued as a finder’s fee. The fair value of the total shares issued is $2,400,441.





(g)
On 12 February 2008, the Company issued 33,000 units at $0.40 per unit pursuant to a private placement for cash proceeds of $12,704, net of issue costs of $496. Each unit consists of one Class A common share and one share purchase warrant.  Each warrant enables the holder to purchase an additional share at an exercise price of $0.50 per share for one year, expiring on 12 February 2009.





(h)
On 28 January 2008, the Company issued 25,000 units at $0.40 per unit pursuant to a private placement for cash proceeds of $9,199, net of issue costs of $801. Each unit consists of one Class A common share and one share purchase warrant.  Each warrant enables the holder to purchase on additional share at an exercise price of $0.50 per share for one year, expiring on 28 January 2009.





(i)
On 26 November 2007, in accordance with the terms of the option agreement as described in Note 3, the Company issued 10,000,000 Class A common shares to acquire 20% of Power Telecom. In addition, 1,000,000 Class A common shares were issued as a finder’s fee. The fair value of the total shares issued is $1,880,032.





(j)
On 29 October 2007, the Company issued 49,500 Class A common shares for services with a fair value of $42,075.





(k)
On 31 August 2007, the Company issued 100,000 units, each unit consisting of one Class A common share and one share purchase warrant, for services. Each warrant entitles the holder to acquire one additional Class A share for $0.40, until 31 August 2009. The fair value of the shares and warrants were $32,000 and $18,681, respectively.





(l)
During the year ended April 30, 2008, the Company issued 137,500 Class A common shares at $0.20 per share upon the exercise of stock options for proceeds of $27,500.





(m)
During the year ended April 30, 2008, the Company issued 40,000 Class A common shares at $0.40 per share upon the exercise of warrants for proceeds of $16,000.




Refer to the Notes 8, 9, 10 and 11 to our audited consolidated financial statements for the years ended April 30, 2009 and April 30, 2008 for future commitments to issue unregistered securities.





- 19 -








ITEM 6: MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATIONS





This report contains forward-looking statements. The words, "anticipate", "believe", expect", "plan", "intend", "estimate", "project", "could", "may", "foresee", and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial
statements and other financial information included elsewhere in this report which contains, in addition to historical information, forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include those discussed below, as well as those discussed elsewhere in this report.





PLANOF OPERATIONS





We were incorporated on December 13, 1994 pursuant to the Laws of the State of Oregon, USA.  Our principal business operations are conducted in British Columbia, Canada.





We are a development stage company, engaged in the acquisition and exploration of oil and gas interests in North America, and continued development of the Video1314 website.  We will not pursue any further option exercises to acquire any further interest in Power Telecom.  In a development stage company, management devotes most
of its activities to establishing a new business. Planned principal activities have not yet produced significant revenues and we have suffered recurring operating losses as is normal in development stage companies. We also have a working capital deficiency of $1,659,081 as at April 30, 2009, which our auditors have stated raises substantial concern on our ability to meet planned business objectives and ongoing operations for the next twelve months. Our ability to emerge from the development stage with respect
to our planned principal business activity is dependent upon our successful efforts to raise additional equity financing, receive funding from affiliates and controlling shareholders.





This review of the results of operations should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements for the years ended April 30, 2009 and April 30, 2008.





Results of Operation for the Year Ended April 30, 2009 ("2009") as compared to the Year Ended April 30, 2008 ("2008")





During 2009 the Company had revenue of $35,780 from operations as compared to $20,201 for 2008.  The revenues in fiscal 2009 were derived from petroleum and natural gas sales of $28,054 (2008 - $20,201) and service revenues of $7,726 (2008 - $nil).





The Company had a net loss of $659,111 in 2009, compared to a net loss of $945,351 in 2008, which includes a decrease in operating expenses of $331,331 to $687,703 in 2009 as compared to 1,019,034 in 2008. The decrease in 2009 was mainly due to the decrease in impairment loss on oil & gas properties of $351,746, decrease in professional
fees of $174,995, offset by the increase in office expens of $180,697.





Our office expenses increased by $180,697 to $473,105 in 2009 as compared to $292,408 in 2008. This increase was mainly due to acquisition costs incurred by Power Telecom during the year.





Fees payable to our transfer agent increased from $8,797 during the fiscal year ended April 30, 2008 to $11,127 in 2009 due to increased filing costs during the year. The Company did not hold a shareholders’ meeting during fiscal 2009.





Professional fees decreased by $174,995 to $147,583 in 2009 from $322,578 in 2008, as the majority of the due diligence and completion of the Option Agreement with Power Telecom was completed in 2008.





- 20 -








During the fiscal year ended April 30, 2007, the Company extended the term on 1,200,000 options for a further five years. The fair value of the original options was deducted from the fair value of the modified options for a difference of $194,840. During the fiscal year ended April 30, 2009, $nil (April 30, 2008, - $4,059) stock-based compensation
expense was charged to operations for the vested incremental increase in the fair value of these stock options. The balance of $142,071 (2008 - $142,071) of unrecognized compensation cost related to the non-vested stock options held by employees will be recognized over future periods.





During the fiscal year ended April 30, 2008, the Company granted 1,000,000 options in accordance with the terms of the Power Telecom Option Agreement as described in Note 3 of the consolidated financial statements. During the fiscal year ended April 30, 2009, $133,977 of stock-based compensation expense was charged to operations, and the
balance of $66,989 of unrecognized compensation cost related to the non-vested stock options will be recognized over future periods as they vest.





During the fiscal year ended April 30, 2009, the Company granted 200,000 options in accordance with the Company’s stock option agreement.  During the fiscal year ended April 30, 2009, $1,653 (April 30, 2008 - $nil) in stock-based compensation expense was charged to operations for the vested incremental increase in the fair
value of these stock options.  The balance of $4,958 of unrecognized compensation cost related to the non-vested stock options will be recognized over future periods as they vest.





During April 30, 2009, there were no purchase or sales of the available-for-sale securities, thus there is an decrease in gain on sale of available-for-sale securities of $1,920 to from $nil in 2009 as compared to $1,920 in 2008.





As of April 30, 2009, the Company owed related companies controlled or significantly influenced by the President of the Company $1,305,619 (April 30, 2008 - $830,021) comprised of advances and/or expenses paid on behalf of the Company. The amounts are non-interest bearing, unsecured and without specific terms of repayment.





As of April 30, 2009, the Company was owed by related companies controlled or significantly influenced by the President of the Company $8,108 (April 30, 2008 - $21,139) comprised of advances and/or expenses paid by the Company. The amounts are non-interest bearing, unsecured and without specific terms of repayment.





The Company’s oil and gas wells located in Burleson County, Texas are producing but a value cannot be placed on them due to vertical fracture features that prevent the estimation of reserves. Accordingly, cumulative impairment loss of $199,335 equal to the investment in the oil wells that would have otherwise been recorded has been
charged to operations. During the fiscal year ended April 30, 2009, $2,572 (2008 - $80,892) of impairment loss was incurred.





On May 4, 2006, the Company entered into an agreement with Energy Source Inc. (“ESI”) to drill up to 24 gas wells located in Kentucky. The Company can earn a 100% working interest (60% net revenue interest) in four gas wells by paying $185,000 per well and has the option to acquire a 100% working interest (60% net revenue interest)
in an additional 20 wells over an 18-month period at a price to be agreed upon. During the fiscal year ended April 30, 2008, the option for the additional 20 wells expired. Each well is subject to a 12.5% net revenue interest to the landowner and a 27.5% interest to ESI. The first three wells have been paid for and drilled to date. On May 18, 2006, the Company entered into an agreement with Teryl Resources Corp. (“Teryl”), a public company related by common directors and officers, to farm-out a 40%
working interest outlined above, subject to a 12.5% net revenue interest to the landowner and a 27.5% interest to ESI, in consideration for paying 50% of the total costs of the wells. The Company received $277,500 from Teryl during the year ended April 30, 2007, representing 50% of the cost of drilling the first, second and third wells. On September 28, 2006, the Company assigned a 20% working interest (12% net revenue interest) in the third well drilled as part of a financing agreement.




To April 30, 2009, the Company’s portion of the revenue from the wells was approximately $41,873. During the fiscal year ended April 30, 2009, the Company received/accrued $10,176 of revenues from the wells.





- 21 -







Due to the difficult of obtaining an independent reserve report due to the vertical fracture of the wells, the total cost of $2,572 (2008 - $273,426) was impaired and charged to operations during the fiscal period ended April 30, 2009.





We had a basic and diluted loss of $0.01 per share in 2009 compared to a basic and diluted net loss per share of $0.02 for 2008.





LIQUIDITYAND CAPITAL RESOURCES





In the past, we have derived most of our development and operating capital primarily from the issuance of capital stock.  We have also received minimal revenue from our oil and gas wells.





We have been successful in the past in acquiring capital through the issuance of shares of our Common Stock, and through advances from related parties. Although we intend to continue utilizing these sources, there has been no assurance in the past that these sources and methods would continue to be available in the future.





We received funding in 2009 from our affiliated companies (common officers and directors). The total amount owing to related parties is $1,305,619 or 75% of total current liabilities as at April 30, 2009. The balances owing to related parties are non-interest bearing, unsecured and repayable on demand. Our affiliated companies have indicated
that they will not be demanding repayment of these funds during the next fiscal year and will advance, or pay expenses on behalf of the Company if further funds are needed.





The audited consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going-concern. As discussed in note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has minimal revenues and limited capital, which together raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going-concern. The consolidated
financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.





We anticipate that our estimated cash requirements for the fiscal year ending April 30, 2010 will remain at approximately $360,000 being the same as our previous cash requirements of $360,000 incurred during the fiscal year ended April 30, 2009 for operational expenses.





In the event that no other sources of capital were available to us in the future, on a reasonable financial basis, we would face the same obstacles as many small, undercapitalized companies do, and, in the worst case, we could be forced to reorganize or liquidate, either of which consequence would likely have an adverse financial effect
upon our shareholders.





During 2009 we financed our operations and received $498,849 as follows:





(i)
financial support from related parties in the amount of $475,598. These amounts are unsecured, non-interest bearing and due on demand;


(ii)
$22,500 from the issuance of shares of common stock; and








During 2009 we used/invested these funds as follows:





(i)
$361,655 of these funds was spent on operating activities as discussed above under Results of Operations for the year ended April 30, 2009; and;


(ii)
$150,000 was used in the acquisition of the interest in Power Telecom, net of $13,960 cash that was received.





During 2008 we financed our operations and received $320,324 as follows:





- 22 -





(i)
financial support from related parties in the amount of $244,917. These amounts are unsecured, non-interest bearing and due on demand;


(ii)
$65,403 from the issuance of shares of common stock; and


(iii)
$4,000 from subscription for shares of common stock.





During 2008 we invested these funds as follows:





(i)
$134,064 of these funds was spent on operating activities as discussed above under Results of Operation for the year ended April 30, 2008;


(ii)
$200,000 was used as capital for Power Telecom; and


(iii)
$2,240 was received from sale of available-for-sale securities.





As of April 30, 2009, our cash position was $275 as compared to $785 in 2008, and our working capital deficit was $1,659,081.





We may raise additional funds through the exercise of warrants and stock options, if exercised. Options with respect to 2,375,000 shares may be exercised for potential proceeds of $688,750. Warrants with respect to 210,000 shares may be exercised for potential proceeds of $69,300. These options and warrants are currently not in-the-money
and are unlikely to be currently exercised.








ITEM7:                 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





Our consolidated financial statements are included and begin immediately following the signature page to this report. See Item 13 for a list of the financial statements and financial statement schedules included.





ITEM8.
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE





None.





ITEM8A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES





Disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), are controls and other procedures of the Company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate
to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.  As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act, the Company carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures as of April 30, 2009, being the date of the Company’s most recently completed fiscal year end. This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including Mr. John Robertson, the Company’s
Chief Executive Officer, and Mr. James Vandeberg, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer.





As of April 30, 2009, management conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based upon that evaluation, management has concluded that our current disclosure controls and procedures are not effective as of April 30, 2009.





The conclusion that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective was due to the presence of material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting as identified below.  Management anticipates that such disclosure controls and procedures will not be effective until the material weaknesses are remediated.
Our Company intends to remediate the material weaknesses as set out below.





- 23 -





(b)           Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting





The Company’s board of directors and audit committee are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting.  The Company’s internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation and fair
presentation of its consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.





The Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Mr. John Robertson, and the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, Mr. James Vandeberg, assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and Rule 15d-(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act) as of April 30, 2009.





Based on management’s evaluation, we concluded our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as at April 30, 2009 due to inadequate segregation of duties and effective risk assessment.





We plan to take steps to enhance and improve the design of our internal controls over financial reporting. During the period covered by this annual report, we have not been able to remediate the material weaknesses identified above. To remediate such weaknesses, we plan to appoint additional qualified personnel to address inadequate segregation
of duties and ineffective risk management, and adopt sufficient written policies and procedures for accounting and financial reporting. These remediation efforts are largely dependent upon securing additional financing to cover the costs of implementing the changes required. If we are unsuccessful in securing such funds, remediation efforts may be adversely affected.





Notwithstanding the foregoing, all internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective may not prevent or detect misstatements and can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, projections
of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.





This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the SEC that permit the Company
to provide only management’s report in this annual report.








ITEM8B. OTHER INFORMATION.




None.







PARTIII





ITEM9
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS, CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT





The following table sets forth the name, age and position of each Executive Officer, Director and Significant Employee of the Company as at April 30, 2009:











Name

Age

PositionJohn G. Robertson


68

Principal Executive Officer, President, Chairman of the Board and Member of the Board of DirectorsJennifer Lorette  (1)


37

Secretary and Member of the Board of DirectorsJames Vandeberg


65

Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Member of the Board of Directors


(1)
resigned as director and secretary of the company effective July 24, 2009.





All our Directors have served since the formation of the Company in December 1994, except for James L. Vandeberg, who was appointed to the Board of Directors in November 1998.  The Executive Officers were elected on February 4, 1995, except for James L. Vandeberg, who was appointed as Chief Operating Officer on August 1st,
1999, and Chief Financial Officer in November 2001.  All officers currently devote part-time to our operations.





There are no family relationships between any director or executive officer and any other director or executive officer.





The present and principal occupations of our directors and executive officers during the last five years are set forth below:





John G. Robertson - President, Principal Executive Officer and a Member of the Board of Directors





Mr. Robertson has been the President and Principal Executive Officer and a Director of the Company since its formation. Mr. Robertson has been Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of REGI U.S., Inc. since July 1992. Since October 1984 Mr. Robertson has been President and a Director of Reg Technologies Inc., a British Columbia
corporation listed on the TSX Venture Exchange and OTC BB that has financed the research on the Rand Cam Engine since 1986. REGI U.S. is controlled by Rand Energy Group, Inc., a British Columbia corporation of which Reg Technologies Inc. is the majority shareholder. REGI U.S. owns the U.S. rights to the Rand Cam (TM) technology and Rand Energy Group, Inc. owns the worldwide rights exclusive of the U.S. Since June 1997 Mr. Robertson has been President, Principal Executive Officer and a Director of Information-Highway.com,
Inc., an inactive Florida corporation traded on the PinkSheets, and its predecessor. He is also the President and Founder of Teryl Resources Corp., a public company trading on the TSX Venture Exchange and the OTC BB involved in gold, and oil and gas exploration. He is also President of Linux Gold Corp., a public company trading on the OTC Bulletin Board. Since May 1977 Mr. Robertson has been President and a member of the Board of Directors of SMR Investments Ltd., a British Columbia corporation engaged in the
business of management and investment consulting.





James L. Vandeberg - Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer and a Member of the Board of Directors





Mr. Vandeberg became a Director of the Company in November 1998, its Chief Operating Officer in August 1999 and its Chief Financial Officer in November 2001.  Mr. Vandeberg is an attorney in Seattle, Washington.  He has served as our legal counsel since 1996.  Mr. Vandeberg's practice focuses on the corporate
finance area, with an emphasis on securities and acquisitions.  Mr. Vandeberg was previously general counsel and secretary of two NYSE companies.  He is a director of Information-Highway.com, Inc., an inactive Florida corporation traded on the Pink Sheets.  He is also a director of REGI U.S., Inc., an Oregon corporation traded on the OTC Bulletin Board since November 1998 and its Chief Operating Officer since November 1999 and Chief Financial Officer since January 2006.  Mr.
Vandeberg is also a director of Reg Technologies Inc. which is traded on the OTC Bulletin Board and the TSX Venture Exchange.  Mr. Vandeberg has also been a director of ASAP Expo Inc. since May 2005.  He is a member and former director of the American Society of Corporate Secretaries.  He became a member of the Washington Bar Association in 1969 and of the California Bar Association in 1973.  Mr. Vandeberg graduated cum laude from the University of Washington with
a Bachelor of Arts degree in accounting in 1966, and from New York University School of Law in 1969, where he was a Root-Tilden Scholar.





- 25 -





Jennifer Lorette - Secretary and a Member of the Board of Directors





Ms. Lorette was a founder, and has been Secretary/Treasurer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company.  Ms. Lorette resigned as secretary and director effective July 24, 2009.  Since June 1994 Ms. Lorette has been Vice President and director of REGI U.S., Inc., an Oregon corporation
traded on the OTC Bulletin Board. Since April 1994 is a director of Reg Technologies, Inc., a British Columbia corporation listed on the TSX Venture Exchange and OTC BB that has financed the research on the Rand Cam Engine since 1986. REGI U.S. is controlled by Rand Energy Group, Inc., a British Columbia corporation of which Reg Technologies Inc. is the majority shareholder. Ms. Lorette is also a director of Linux Gold Corp, a BC company which trades on the OTC BB.  Ms. Lorette has been a director of
Teryl Resources Corp. since 2001, a BC public company trading on the TSX Venture Exchange and the OTC BB involved in gold, and oil and gas exploration.





Audit Committee





Our Audit Committee consists of the entire Board of Directors of the Company. None of the members of the Audit Committee are “independent directors”.





We do not currently have a financial expert on our audit committee due to our relatively small size. During the year ended April 30, 2009, we relied upon the services of a chartered accounting firm in Vancouver, BC, Canada, to prepare our interim unaudited quarterly and annual financial statements.





The Audit Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities relating to the Company’s corporate accounting and reporting practices.  The Audit Committee is responsible for ensuring that management has established appropriate processes for monitoring the Company’s systems and procedures for financial reporting
and controls, reviewing all financial information in disclosure documents; monitoring the performance and fees and expenses of the Company’s external auditors and recommending external auditors for appointment by shareholders.  The Audit Committee is also responsible for reviewing the Company’s annual financial statements prior to approval by the Board and release to the public.





Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance





Based solely upon a review of Forms 3, 4 and 5 furnished to us, other than Biotonus Clinique Bon Port (Hong Kong) Limited which provided no reports to us, no officer, director or beneficial owner of more than ten percent of our Common Stock failed to file on a timely basis reports required to be filed by Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act
during the most recent fiscal year.





Code of Ethics





The Board of Directors does not have any committees.  Our Board of Directors has not adopted a code of ethics that applies to our principal executive officer or principal financial officer.  We believe that due to the small size of the Company and existing systems we have in place that there is no real benefit to having
a formal code of ethics.





Directors are subject to the laws of the State of Oregon, whereby they are required to act honestly, in good faith and in the best interests of the Company.








ITEM10. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION





STATEMENT OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION





The Company is required, under applicable securities legislation in Canada, to disclose to its Shareholders details of compensation paid to its directors and officers.  The following fairly reflects all material information regarding compensation paid by the Company to its directors and officers, which information has been disclosed
to the Company's Shareholders in accordance with applicable Canadian law.





- 26 -





Executive Compensation





Compensation Discussion and Analysis





The Company’s executive officers make recommendations to the board of directors regarding compensation policies and the compensation of senior officers. The Company does not have a Compensation Committee.  The compensation of the senior executives comprises two components; namely, a base salary or consulting fees and the
grant of stock options pursuant to the Company’s stock option plan which is more particularly outlined below under the Option-based Awardssection.   These forms of compensation are chosen to attract, retain and motivate the performance of selected directors, officers, employees or consultants of the Company of high caliber and potential.  Each senior executive is employed for his or her skills to perform specific tasks and
the base salary and number of options is fixed accordingly.





Option-based Awards





The grant of option-based awards to the senior executives is determined by the recommendation of executive officers to the board of directors pursuant to the terms of the stock option plan referred to below. Previous grants of option-based awards are taken into account when considering new grants.





The options are always granted at market price. The valuation of the fair value of the options at the time of the grant is based on the Black Scholes model and includes the following assumptions: weighted average risk free rate, weighted average expected life, expected volatility and dividend yield.





During the year ended April 30, 2009, no option-based awards for executives were granted.





Summary Compensation Table





Named Executive Officer mean the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), the Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) or any individual acting in a similar capacity or function, regardless of the amount of compensation of that individual and each of the Company’s three most highly compensated executive officers, other than
the CEO and CFO, or three most highly compensated individuals acting in similar capacities, who were serving as executive officers, or in a similar capacity, at the end of the most recent financial year and whose compensation exceeds CDN$150,000, and such individuals who would be an NEO but for the fact that they were not serving as an executive officer or in a similar capacity at the end of that financial year.





During the Company’s last completed financial year ended April 30, 2009, the Company had two Named Executive Officers: Mr. John Robertson, President and CEO, and Mr. James Vandeberg, COO and CFO.





The following table (presented in accordance with Form 51-102F6 – Statement of Executive Compensation (“Form 51-102F6”) under National Instrument 51-102 – Continuous Disclosure Obligations) sets forth all annual, long term and other compensation for services in all capacities to the Company and its subsidiaries payable
to the NEOs for the three financial years ended April 30, 2009, 2008, and 2007 (to the extent required by the Regulations) in respect of the Named Executive Officers:





The following table sets forth the aggregate cash compensation paid for services rendered to the Company during the last three fiscal years by the Company's Chief Executive Officer and the Company's most highly compensated executive officers who served as such at the end of the last fiscal year.  No executive officer had an annual
salary and bonus in excess of $100,000 during such year.





- 27 -








Non-equity incentive plan compensation
($)Name and Principal Position
Year Ended
April 30
Salary
($)
Share- based Awards
($)
Option- Based Awards
($) (6)
Annual incen-
tive plans
($)
Long-term incentive plans
($)
Pension value
($)
All other
Compen-sation
($)(5)
Total
compensation
($)John G. Robertson,CEO(1)(2)
2009
2008
2007
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
40,592
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
40,592James Vandeberg, CFO(3)(4)
2009
2008
2007
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
4,059
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
4,059


(1)
Mr. Robertson is also a director but does not receive any compensation in that capacity.


(2)
Mr. Robertson’s option-based awards received during 2007 consisted of 1,000,000 stock options which were originally granted on November 20, 2001 but were extended on October 20, 2006 to expire on November 20, 2011.  These options have an exercise price of $0.20 and a fair value of $0.162367 per share.


(3)
Mr. Vandeberg is also a director but does not receive any compensation in that capacity.


(4)
Mr. Vandeberg’s option-based awards received during 2007 consisted of 100,000 stock options which were originally granted on November 20, 2001 but were extended on October 20, 2006 to expire on November 20, 2011.  These options have an exercise price of $0.20 and a fair value of $0.162367 per share.


(5)
The value of perquisites received by each of the NEOs, including property or other personal benefits provided to the NEOs that are not generally available to all employees, were not, in the aggregate, greater than $50,000 or 10% of the NEOs total salary for the financial year.


(6)
The valuation of the fair value of the options at the time of the grant is based on the Black Scholes model and includes the following assumptions; weighted average risk free rate, weighted average expected life, expected volatility and dividend yield.





Narrative Discussion





The Company does not have a share-based award plan other than the stock option plan referred to above. The Company also does not have a pension plan or a long term incentive plan.





Employment Contracts and Termination of Employment





There are no employment agreements or other compensating plans or arrangements with regard to any of the Named Executive Officers which provide for specific compensation in the event of resignation, retirement, other termination of employment or from a change of control of the Issuer or from a change in a Named Executive Officer’s
responsibilities following a change in control.





Pursuant to the Company’s stock option plan, in the event the optionee’s employment by or engagement with (as a director  or otherwise) the Company is terminated by the Company for any reason  other  than  death before exercise of the options granted hereunder, the stock  option
granted to the Participant shall immediately expire and all rights to purchase shares thereunder shall immediately cease and expire and be of no further force or effect.





In  the event the Participant resigns as an employee, the Participant shall have thirty (30) days from the date of such resignation to exercise such of the optioned  shares  in  respect  of  which  such  option  has  not been previously exercised,  and  thereafter  his
option shall expire and all rights to purchase shares  hereunder  shall  cease and expire and be of no further force or effect.





Refer also to the Compensation Discussion and Analysissection above.





- 28 -





Incentive Plan Awards





Narrative Discussion





As reported above under the Summary Compensation Table,the Company does not have a share-based award plan or a long term incentive plan.   Information with respect to the grant of stock options is more particularly described above in the Option-based
Awardsand Compensation Discussion and Analysissections.





Outstanding Option-Based Awards and Share-Based Awards





No option-based awards were granted to the NEOs at the end of the most recently completed financial year.  The following table sets out the option-based awards that are currently outstanding as at the end of the most recently completed financial year.





Option-based Awards


Stock-based AwardsName

Number of
securities underlying unexercised options
(#)


Option exercise price
($)

Option expiration date

Value of unexercised in-the-money options
($)


Number of shares or units of shares that have not vested
(#)


Market or payout value of share-based awards that have not vested
($)John Robertson


900,000



0.20

November 20, 2011


N/A



750,000



121,775James Vandeberg


100,000



0.20

November 20, 2011


N/A



75,000



12,178





Incentive Plan Awards – value vested or earned during the year





No incentive stock options were granted to any NEOs during the year ended April 30, 2009.





No incentive stock options vested during the year ended April 30, 2009 which were held by the NEOs.





Mr. Robertson was granted options to purchase 1,000,000 shares of common stock at $0.20 per share.  These options were previously due to expire on November 20, 2006.  On October 20, 2006, the Board of Directors extended the expiry date to November 20, 2011.





During the year ended April 30, 2009, neither of the two NEOs exercised or sold options. There were 725,000 unexercised options at the financial year end held by the NEOs, none of which were in-the-money.





Pension Plan Benefits





As reported under the Summary Compensation Table, the Company does not maintain a Pension Plan for its employees and therefore no benefits were received.





Termination of Employment or Change of Control





Other than as described in the Narrative Discussionsection under the Summary Compensation Table, the Company has no plans or arrangements with respect to remuneration received or that may be received by the Named Executive
Officers during the Company’s most recently completed financial year or current financial year in view of compensating such officers in the event of termination of employment (as a result of resignation, retirement, change of control, etc.) or a change in responsibilities following a change of control, where the value of such compensation exceeds $150,000 per executive officer.





- 29 -





DIRECTOR COMPENSATION




During the most recently completed financial year, the Company paid no cash compensation (including salaries, fees, directors’ fees, commissions, bonuses paid for services rendered during the most recently completed fiscal year, bonus during the most recently completed fiscal year for services rendered in a previous year, and any
compensation other than bonuses earned during the most recently completed fiscal year, the payment of which was deferred) to the Directors for services rendered.





Executive Officers of the Company, who also act as Directors of the Company, do not receive any additional compensation for services rendered in such capacity other than as paid by the Company to such Executive Officers in their capacity as Executive Officers (see “Executive Compensation”).





Option-Based Awards, Share-Based Awards and Non-equity Incentive Plan Compensation for Directors





As disclosed under Director Compensation,the Company does not have a share-based award plan, a pension plan or a non-equity incentive plan for its directors.





Option-based awards to the directors are granted pursuant to the terms of the Company’s stock option plan. The options are always granted at market price. The valuation of the fair value of the options at the time of the grant is based on the Black Scholes model and includes the following assumptions; weighted average risk free rate,
weighted average expected life, expected volatility and dividend yield.





Directors generally receive a grant of stock options upon their appointment.





During the most recently completed year, no stock options were granted to any directors.





Non-Cash Compensation





No stock options were granted by the Company during the financial year ended April 30, 2009 to the directors who are not a Named Executive Officers of the Company.





There were no exercises of stock options during the financial year ended April 30, 2009 by the directors who are not the Named Executive Officers, and the financial year end value of unexercised options.  There were 75,000 unexercised options at the financial year end held by one directors who is not a Named Executive Officer,
none of which were in-the-money.





Incentive Plan Awards Tables





No incentive stock options, which were held by the non-executive directors, vested during the 2009 year.





No other compensation is paid to any of our Executive Officers or Directors. We may in the future create retirement, pension, profit sharing, insurance and medical reimbursement plans covering our Officers and Directors. At the present time, we have no such plans. No advances have been made or are contemplated by us to any of our Officers
or Directors.





Mr. Robertson was granted options to purchase 1,000,000 shares of common stock at $0.20 per share.  These options were previously due to expire on November 20, 2006.  On October 20, 2006, the Board of Directors extended the expiry date to November 20, 2011.








OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR END





The following table sets forth information about outstanding equity awards held by our named executive officers as of April 30, 2008.








- 30 -





Option Awards (1)


Name

Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options granted (#)
Exercisable

Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options granted (#)
Unexercisable
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options
(#)

Option Exercise Price ($)

Option Expiration dateJohn Robertson


900,000

Nil
Nil

$
0.20

November 20, 2011James Vandeberg


100,000

Nil
Nil

$
0.20

November 20, 2011


(1)
There were no Stock Awards awarded to the named executive officers.  Accordingly, this disclosure has been omitted.





Compensation of Directors





During the most recently completed financial year, the Company paid no cash compensation (including salaries, fees, directors’ fees, commissions, bonuses paid for services rendered during the most recently completed fiscal year, bonuses paid during the most recently completed fiscal year for services rendered in a previous year, and
any compensation other than bonuses earned during the most recently completed fiscal year the payment of which was deferred) to the Directors for services rendered.





Executive Officers of the Company, who also act as Directors of the Company, do not receive any additional compensation for services rendered in such capacity other than as paid by the Company to such Executive Officers in their capacity as Executive Officers (see “Compensation of Executive Officers”).





ITEM11.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.





The following table sets forth, as of September 11, 2009 our outstanding Class A Common Stock owned of record or beneficially by each person who owned of record, or was known by us to own beneficially, more than 5% of our Common Stock, and the name and shareholdings of each Executive Officer and Director and all Executive Officers and Directors
as a group. A person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of securities that can be acquired by such person within 60 days from the date of this report upon the exercise of warrants or options. Each beneficial owner's percentage ownership is determined by assuming that options that are held by such person and which are exercisable within 60 days from the date are exercised.





Name

Class A Common Shares Owned


Percentage of Class A Shares OwnedJohn G. Robertson, President and member of the Board of Directors [1][2]


21,861,020



31.04%Access Information Services, Inc. [3]


12,472,508



17.71%Robertson Family Trust [4]


20,830,248



29.57%JGR Petroleum Inc. [5]


8,357,840



11.87%SMR Investments [6]


4,367,252



6.20%James L. Vandeberg [1][8], Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Member of the Board of Directors


108,000



*Shareholders of Power Telecom Limited [8][9]


29,392,100



41.37%All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group [1][2][6][7]


25,336,272



35.97%










- 31 -





*    Less than one percent of the issued and outstanding shares as at April 30, 2009 (70,063,817) and at the date of this Form 10-KSB (70,438,562).







Except as noted below, all shares are held beneficially and of record and each record shareholder has sole voting and investment power.




[1]
These individuals are our Executive Officers and Directors and may be deemed to be our "parents or founders" as that term is defined in the Rules and Regulations promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
 
 [2]
Includes 12,472,508 shares registered in the name of Access Information Services, Ltd., a corporation controlled by the Robertson Family Trust, 8,357,840 shares registered in the name of JGR Petroleum Inc. , a corporation controlled by the Robertson Family Trust and 900,000 options, of which 150,000are currently exercisable. Mr. Robertson is one of three trustees of the Robertson Family Trust, which acts by the majority
vote of the three trustees. Mr. Robertson disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares owned or controlled by the Robertson Family Trust. Mr. Robertson's address is the same as our address.
 
 [3]
Access Information Services is a corporation owned by the Robertson Family Trust. Its address is 240 - 11780 Hammersmith Way, Richmond, British Columbia V7A 5E9, Canada.
 
 [4]
Includes 12,472,508 shares owned of record by Access Information Services, a corporation owned by the trust and 8,357,840 shares registered in the name of JGR Petroleum Inc. , a corporation controlled by the Robertson Family Trust. The address of the Robertson Family Trust is 240 - 11780 Hammersmith Way, Richmond, British Columbia V7A 5E9, Canada.
 
 [5]
JGR Petroleum Inc. is a corporation owned by The Robertson Family Trust. Its address is 240 - 11780 Hammersmith Way, Richmond, British Columbia V7A 5E9, Canada
 
 [6]
SMR Investments is a corporation owned by Susanne Robertson, the wife of Mr. Robertson. Its address is 240 - 11780 Hammersmith Way, Richmond, British Columbia V7A 5E9, Canada
 
 [7]
Includes 8,000 shares of common stock and 100,000 options of which 25,000 are currently exercisable. Mr. Vandeberg's address is 22344 NE 31st Street, Sammamish, WA 98074.
 
 [8]
Of these, 10,000 shares of IAS common stock were issued to Samuel Kam, our Chairman, and one of the two shareholders of Power Telecom Limited.  Mr. Kam is not an executive officer. Pursuant to Option Agreement dated November 26, 2007 between the Company and the shareholders of Biotonus Clinique Bon Port (Hong Kong) Limited, of which Samuel Kam is a director, and Power Telecom Limited, Messrs. Samuel Kam
and Biotonus Clinique Bon Port (Hong Kong) Limited covenant to vote their shares of the Company in favour of the composition of the Board of Directors of IAS as Mr. Robertson shall so direct in writing until either all options are exercised or until December 31, 2013.. Mr. Robertson disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares.
 
 [9]
Of these, 29,392,100 shares of IAS common stock are held by Biotonus Clinique Bon Port (Hong Kong) Limited, one of the two shareholders of Power Telecom Limited.  The beneficial owner of Biotonus Clinique Bon Port (Hong Kong) Limited is Samuel Kam who is also a director.


CHANGES IN CONTROL





Other than as follows, we know of no arrangements the operation of which may result in a change of our control.





Pursuant to the Option Agreement dated November 26, 2007 between the Company and the shareholders of Biotonus Clinique Bon Port (Hong Kong) Limited and Power Telecom Limited, from the date of the Option Agreement until the earlier of the date that IAS has fully exercised the options under the Option Agreement and December 31, 2013, Messrs.
Samuel Kam and Biotonus Clinique Bon Port (Hong Kong) Limited covenant to vote their shares of the Company in favour of the composition of the Board of Directors of IAS as Mr. Robertson shall so direct in writinguntil either all options are exercised or until December 31, 2013. Mr. Robertson disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares (refer to our 8-K dated and filed with the SEC November 28, 2007).








- 32 -





ITEM12.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE





Integral Concepts, Inc. ("ICI"), holder of the exclusive worldwide license to the CTHA technology, entered into an option agreement with SMR Investments Ltd. ("SMR"), a corporation owned by Sue Robertson, the wife of Mr. Robertson, dated November 18, 1994, and amended December 16, 1994 (the "Option Agreement"). The Option Agreement provided
that ICI would issue a sublicense to SMR for the CTHA subject to the payment of $250,000; a 3% royalty from gross sales; and a subsequent public entity to be established. We were organized by SMR and Robertson as a result. ICI retained all military applications and resulting procurement interests. The contract period relating to the three percent royalty to be paid to ICI commences when sales are made by us and SMR and continue during the life of the Option Agreement. The term of the Option Agreement is perpetual
as is the ICI License.





On December 13, 1994, SMR assigned us the rights to the Option Agreement in consideration of $50,000 advanced by Access Information Services, Inc. (the "Option Assignment"). Access Information Services, Inc. is a corporation owned and controlled by the Robertson Family Trust.





On December 14, 1994, we issued 3,000,000 Class A Shares to Access Information Services, Inc., pursuant to the Option Assignment. The value assigned to the 3,000,000 Class A common shares issued to Access Information Services Inc. was $0.50. The valuation of the 3,000,000 shares issued to Access Information Services, Inc. was arbitrarily
determined by our Board of Directors. The $250,000 has been paid to ICI and was a one time payment.




On July 10, 1995, ICI entered into the Sublicense wherein ICI granted to us the exclusive worldwide right to manufacture, sell copies of, sublicense and distribute the process and equipment related to the design, construction and operation of the CTHA and to further sublicense others the rights to manufacture, sell copies of, license and
distribute the same, excluding all military applications and procurement interests. The Sublicense was the culmination of the agreement between ICI and SMR, and SMR and us. On December 27, 1995, SMR assigned us all of its rights and duties in the CTHA technology. The purpose of this assignment was to assign any and all rights or duties which may have been held by SMR as a result of the Option Agreement, it being understood that the Option Agreement was nothing more than an agreement in principle. The term of
the Sublicense is perpetual and requires the payment of a minimum annual royalty of $3,000. Further, we will pay a royalty of 10% of the net revenues derived from sales, licenses or sublicenses of the CTHA technology with a credit for the minimum royalty. In addition we shall pay a royalty of 3% of the gross revenues derived from the sales, licenses or sublicenses of the CTHA technology.






We amended the Sublicense with ICI in March 1997 to clarify the applications of CTHA technology subject to our sublicense. As amended, we have exclusive rights to all commercial applications. Emergent Technologies Corporation ("ETC") has the exclusive rights to all governmental and military applications for the CTHA antenna. In consideration
for the amendment, we received a 50% reduction in royalties to be paid to ICI over a three year period plus an enlarged definition of Technology to include all future enhancements to the CTHA technology.






Effective March 17, 2005, we entered into a settlement and release agreement with Integral Concepts Inc. (“ICI”) to terminate the exclusive worldwide sublicense granted to the Company by ICI.






The Company entered into an agreement dated April 6, 2005, with a private company controlled by the President of the Company to acquire a working interest in two oil wells located in Burleson County, Texas.  The wells are producing but a value cannot be placed on them due to vertical fracture features that prevent the estimation
of reserves.  The Company agreed to issue up to 1,000,000 shares (issued – 279,477) of restricted common stock at the rate of one share for every $0.10 of revenue from the wells. Refer to Note 10 (a) to our consolidated financial statements.






To date, there have not been any transactions between us and our officers, directors, principal shareholders or affiliates other than as set forth above.  We believe that the transactions described here were on terms







- 33 -







more favorable to our officers, and directors, than otherwise could be obtained if such transactions were with non-related parties.









Director Independence





Our common stock is traded on the over-the-counter bulletin board.  Therefore, we are not required to have independent members of the board of directors.







ITEM13.                 EXHIBITS.







Number
Description3.1
Articles of Incorporation
(1)3.2
Article of Amendment
(1)3.3
By-Laws
(1)3.4
Articles of Amendment May 2007
(7)4.1
Specimen Share Certificate for Class A Shares
(1)4.2
Specimen Share Certificate for Class B Shares
(1)4.3
Specimen Warrant
(2)4.4
Specimen Debenture
(2)10.1
Marketing Agreement between IAS and Information Highway.com, Inc.
(3)10.2
Professional Service Agreement between IAS and Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
(3)10.3
Consulting Agreement between IAS and Capital Research Group Inc.
(3)10.4
License Agreement between IAS and World Tracking Technologies, Inc.
(3)10.5
Amendment to License Agreement between IAS and World Tracking Technologies, Inc.
(3)10.6
License Agreement between IAS and ARINC Incorporated
(3)10.7
Renewal Lease Agreement for Kokomo, Indiana Facilities
(3)10.8
Amendment No.2 to License Agreement between IAS and Wherify Wireless, Inc. (formerly “World Tracking Technologies, Inc.)
(4)10.9
JGR Petroleum, Inc. Interest in Oil and Gas Wells
(5)10.10
West Virginia University Research Corporation Non-Exclusive License Agreement
(5)10.11
West Virginia University Research Corporation Settlement and
Release Agreement
(5)10.12
Integral Concepts Inc. Settlement And Release Agreement
(5)10.13
Joint Venture Agreement between IAS and Energy Source, Inc. May 4, 2006
(6)10.14
Option Agreement dated November 26, 2007 between IAS Energy, Inc. and the shareholders of Biotonus Clinique Bon Port (Hong Kong) Limited and Power Telecom Limited
(8)10.15
Agreement dated April 7, 2008 between IAS Energy, Inc. and Teryl Resources Corp.
(9)23.1
Consent of Independent Auditors (Malone & Bailey PC)
(10)23.2
Consent of Smythe Ratcliffe LLP
(10)31.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(10)   
  31.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(10)32.1
Certification of John Robertson, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002
(10)32.2
Certificate of James Vandeberg, Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002
(10)


____________


(1) Incorporated by reference from Form S-1 Registration Statement (33-92592).


(2) Incorporated by reference from Form 10-KSB for Fiscal Year 1998.


(3) Incorporated by reference from Form 10-KSB for Fiscal Year 2000.


(4) Incorporated by reference from Form 10-KSB for Fiscal Year 2001.


(5) Incorporated by reference from Form 10-KSB for Fiscal Year 2006


(6) Incorporated by reference from Form 10-KSB for Fiscal Year 2007


(7) Incorporated by reference to our Form 8-K filed June 13, 2007


(8) Incorporated by reference to our Form 8-K filed November 29, 2007


(9) Incorporated by reference to our Form 8-K dated and filed April 10, 2008


(10) Attached hereto.





Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms


Balance Sheets


Statements of Operations


Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)


Statements of Cash Flows


Notes to Financial Statements





ITEM14.                 PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.





The following table discloses accounting fees and services which we paid to our auditor, Malone & Bailey PC, Certified Public Accountants, and to our former auditors, James Stafford, Inc., Chartered Accountants, and Smythe Ratcliffe LLP during 2009 and 2008:





(a)  Audit Fees


$50,000



$40,000(b)  Audit-Related Fees


$0



$0(c)  Tax Fees


$0



$0(d)  All Other Fees


$0



$0





Our Audit Committee consists of the entire Board of Directors of the Company and is comprised of seasoned business professionals, whereby two members each have over 30 years of experience in the investment business, are board members of several corporations and one of the members is an attorney whose practice focuses on the corporate finance
area, with an emphasis on securities and acquisitions. On this basis, we believe that the audit committee has adequate resources available to it when financial expertise and advice are necessary.




Despite being comprised of our entire Board of Directors, our Audit Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities relating to the Company’s corporate accounting and reporting practices.  The Audit Committee is responsible for ensuring that management has established appropriate processes for







- 35 -







monitoring the Company’s systems and procedures for financial reporting and controls, reviewing all financial information in disclosure documents; monitoring the performance and fees and expenses of the Company’s external auditors and recommending external auditors for appointment by shareholders.  The Audit Committee is
also responsible for reviewing the Company’s annual financial statements prior to approval by the Board and release to the public.  Currently the members are John Robertson and  James Vandeberg .






Upon recommendation of our Audit Committee, on September 5, 2008, our board of directors terminated Smythe Ratcliffe LLP, Chartered Accountants as our principal accountant, who audited our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2008, and appointed James Stafford, Inc., Chartered Accountants as the Company’s
new principal accountant.  On July 8, 2009, James Stafford, Inc., Chartered Accountants, resigned as the Company’s principal accountants.  Upon recommendation of our Audit Committee, on July 15, 2009, our board of directors appointed Malone & Bailey PC, Certified Public Accountants, as the Company’s new independent principal accountant (see the Company’s Form 8-K dated September 10, 2008, Form 8-K dated July 14, 2009 and the 8-K dated July 23, 2009, filed on EDGAR).




In the table above, and the disclosure below, “audit fees” are fees billed by the Company’s external auditor for services provided in auditing the Company’s annual financial statements for the subject year. “Audit-related fees” are fees not included in audit fees that are billed by the auditor for assurance
and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s financial statements. “Tax fees” are fees billed by the auditor for professional services rendered for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning. “All other fees” are fees billed by the auditor for products and services not included in the foregoing categories.





Audit Fees


The aggregate fees billed by Smythe Ratcliffe LLP, Chartered Accountants, James Stafford, Inc., Chartered Accountants, and Malone & Bailey PC, Certified Public Accountants for professional services rendered for the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements and review of financial statements included in our Form 10-Qs or
services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for the fiscal years ended April 30 2009 and 2008 were $50,000 and $40,000, respectively.





Audit Related Fees


The aggregate fees billed for assurance and related services by Smythe Ratcliffe LLP, Chartered Accountants, James Stafford, Inc., Chartered Accountants, and Malone & Bailey PC, Certified Public Accountants, as applicable, relating to the performance of the audit of our financial statements for the fiscal years ended April 30 2009 and
2008, which are not reported under the heading "Audit Fees" above, were $Nil and $Nil, respectively.





Tax Fees


For the fiscal years ended April 30 2009 and 2008, the aggregate fees billed for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning by Smythe Ratcliffe LLP, Chartered Accountants, James Stafford, Inc., Chartered Accountants, and Malone & Bailey PC, Certified Public Accountants, as applicable, were $Nil and $Nil, respectively.





All Other Fees


For the fiscal years ended April 30 2009 and 2008, the aggregate fees billed by Smythe Ratcliffe LLP, Chartered Accountants, James Stafford, Inc., Chartered Accountants, and Malone & Bailey PC, Certified Public Accountants, as applicable, for products and services other than the services set out above, were $Nil and $Nil, respectively.





- 36 -








SIGNATURES





In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report or amendment to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.





IAS ENERGY, INC.





By: /s/ John G. Robertson


John G. Robertson, President


Chief Executive Officer and Director





Dated:  September 14, 2009





In accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated below:








Signature
Title
Date/s/ John G. Robertson
(John G. Robertson)
President, Secretary, and Chief Executive Officer and Director
September 14, 2009/s/ James Vandeberg
(James Vandeberg)
Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director
September  14, 2009


























- 37 -








Item 7:                   Financial Statements











IAS Energy, Inc.


(A Development Stage Company)


April 30, 2009 and 2008























Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms
F-i-iiConsolidated Balance Sheets
F-1Consolidated Statements of Operations
F-2Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
F-4Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
F-6Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
F-12


























































































































REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM











To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of


IAS Energy, Inc. (A Development Stage Company)




We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of IAS Energy, Inc. (A Development Stage Company) as of April 30, 2009 and the related consolidated statement of operations, consolidated statement of cash flows and changes in stockholders’ deficit for the year then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.
 
 We conducted our audit in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatements. The Company is not required to have, nor were
we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures
in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
 In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of April 30, 2009 and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America.




The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has negative working capital and suffered recurring losses from operations, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue
as a going concern. Management’s plans regarding those matters are described in Note 2. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.











MALONE & BAILEY, PC


www.malone-bailey.com


Houston, Texas





September 14, 2009





- F-ii -








REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 TO THE DIRECTORS AND STOCKHOLDERS OF IAS ENERGY, INC.
 (A Development Stage Company)
 
 We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of IAS Energy, Inc. (A Development Stage Company) as at April 30, 2008 and the statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows for the year then ended.  These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.  Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
 
 We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States of America).  Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
 In our opinion, based on our audit, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as at April 30, 2008 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of America.
 
 The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going-concern.  As discussed in note 1 to the financial statements, the Company has sustained accumulated losses of $7,188,362 since its inception and has a deficit in working capital, which raises substantial doubt about its
ability to continue as a going-concern.  The financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of asset carrying amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might result should the Company be unable to continue as a going-concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in note 1.
 
 
 “Smythe Ratcliffe LLP” (signed)
 
 
 
 Chartered Accountants
 
 Vancouver, Canada
 August 11, 2008











-  F- iii -





IAS Energy, Inc.
 (A Development Stage Company)
 Consolidated Balance Sheets
 
 
 April 30,
2009


April 30,
2008AssetsCurrent AssetsCash

$
275


$
785Available-for-sale securities (Note 7)


61,765



162,589Accrued revenues from petroleum interests


5,156



3,052Prepaid expenses


7,731



69,209Due from related parties (Note 5)


8,108



21,139Total Current Assets


83,035



256,774Investment (Note 3)


-



4,444,010Oil and Gas Properties (Note 11)


-



-Goodwill (Note 3)


7,018,592



-Total Assets

$
7,101,627


$
4,700,784Liabilities and Stockholders’ EquityCurrent LiabilitiesBank indebtedness

$
6,755


$
6,004Accounts payable


365,713



67,654Accrued liabilities


39,029



6,126Due to related parties (Note 5)


1,305,619



830,021Debentures (Note 6)


25,000



25,000Total Liabilities


1,742,116



934,805Commitments (Note 13)


-



-Stockholders’ EquityPreferred Stock, 50,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding


-



-Common stock and additional paid-in capital in excess of par  (Note 8)Class A voting, 100,000,000 common shares authorized without par value,70,063,817 and 58,408,039 shares issued and outstanding


13,151,059



10,770,353Class “B” non-voting, 100,000,000 common shares authorized without par value, none issued and outstanding


-



-Obligation to issue shares (Note 11)


-



147,338Accumulated other comprehensive income


(65,838
)


36,650Deficit accumulated during the development stage


(7,725,710
)


(7,188,362
)Total Stockholders’ Equity


5,359,511



3,765,979Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

$
7,101,627


$
4,700,784












The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.





IAS Energy, Inc.
 (A Development Stage Company)
 Consolidated Statements of Operations


Cumulative from
December 13, 1994 (Date of Inception) to
April 30,
2009
(Unaudited)


For The year
ended
April 30,
2009


For the year
ended
April 30,
2008RevenueOil and natural gas sales

$
100,263


$
28,054


$
20,201Service revenue


7,726



7,726



-Total Revenue


107,989



35,780



20,201Operating expensesGain on write-off of payables


(63,487
)


-



-Depletion and depreciation


5,897



-



1,470Lease operating expense


11,244



11,244



-License


16,500



2,000



3,000Office


824,142



473,105



292,408Professional fees


660,347



147,583



322,578Transfer agent and regulatory


35,895



11,127



8,797Loss from equity investment (Note 3)


76,535



40,072



36,463Impairment gain (loss) – petroleum interest (Note 11(a))


350,998



2,572



354,318Total Operating Expenses


1,918,071



687,703



1,019,034Loss from Operations


(1,810,082
)


(651,923
)


(998,833
)Other Income (Expenses)Gain on sale of available-for-sale securities (Note 7)


104,670



-



1,920Interest on convertible debentures


(15,316
)


(2,188
)


(2,188
)Gain on license obligation


1,000



-



-Gain (loss) on settlement of obligation to issue shares


48,750



(5,000
)


53,750Loss before discontinued operations


(1,670,978
)


(659,111
)


(945,351
)Discontinued operations


(6,054,732
)


-



-Net loss

$
(7,725,710
)

$
(659,111
)

$
(945,351
)








The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.




Other Compensation income (loss)Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities


58,146



(100,824
)


(39,395
)Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net lossGain (loss) Foreign currency translation


(122,320
)


-



(2,320
)(1,664
)


(1,664
)


-Total other comprehensive loss


(65,838
)


(102,488
)


(41,715
)Comprehensive loss


(7,791,548
)


(761,599
)


(987,066
)Loss Per Share – Basic and Diluted






(0.01
)


(0.02
)Weighted average number of class A common shares Outstanding – basic and diluted






67,118,675



42,578,181











IAS Energy, Inc.
 (A Development Stage Company)
 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
 
 For the period from the date of commencement of development stage on 1 May 2005 to
April 30,
2009
Unaudited


For the year
ended
April 30,
2009


For the year
ended
April 30,
2008Operating activitiesNet loss

$
(7,725,710
)

$
(659,111
)

$
(945,351
)Adjustments to reconcile loss to net cash used by operating activitiesAssets written-off


455,957



-



-Depreciation and depletion


193,183



-



1,470Gain on shares cancelled


(10
)


-



-Gain on sale of available-for-sale securities


(104,670
)


-



(1,920
)Gain on write-off of payables


(549,562
)


-



-Shares issued for services


630,125



-



74,075Shares issued for convertible debenture interest


18,786



-



-loss on settlement of obligation to issue
shares


(53,750
)


-



(53,750
)Shares issued to settle obligation


107,500



-



107,500Warrants issued for services


18,681



-



18,681Stock-based compensation


275,011



135,630



90,671Loss from equity investment


76,535



40,072



36,463Impairment loss on oil and gas properties


348,426



-



354,318Change in operating assets and liabilitiesPrepaid expenses and deposits


60,489



64,042



(1,553
)Accounts receivable


-



-



3,468Inventory


(28,615
)


-



-Accrued revenues from oil and gas properties


(5,156
)


(2,104
)


2,342Accounts payable and accrued liabilities


825,829



46,785



63,984Due to related parties


111,091



13,031



115,538Net Cash Used in Operating Activities


(5,345,860
)


(361,655
)


(134,064
)Investing activitiesAcquisition, net of cash received


(350,000
)


(150,000
)


(200,000
)Cash acquired from Power Telecom


13,960



13,960



-Purchase of property and equipment


(99,626
)


-



-Purchase of license


(250,000
)


-



-Increase in patent protection costs


(266,822
)


-



-Investment in oil and gas properties


(555,000
)


-



-Recoveries to oil and gas properties


277,500



-



-Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale securities


104,990



-



2,240Purchase of securities


(115,878
)


-



-Net Cash Used in Investing Activities


(1,240,876
)


(136,040
)


(197,760
)





The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.






Financing activitiesAdvances from related parties


1,845,093



475,598



244,917Bank indebtedness


6,755



751



6,004Proceeds from issuance of common stock


4,332,827



22,500



65,403Proceeds from convertible debentures


400,000



-



-Proceeds from common stock subscribed


4,000



-



4,000Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities


6,588,675



498,849



320,324Effect of exchange rate changes on cash


(1,664
)


(1,664
)


-Net increase (decrease) in cash


275



(510
)


(11,500
)Cash, beginning of year


-



785



12,285Cash, end of year


275



275



785
  Supplemental Disclosures
 
 Interest paid


8,752



2,188



2,188Income tax paid


-



-



-
 Non-cash investing and financing activitiesIssue of common stock to settle related party debt


892,741



-



-Issue of common stock for convertible
debentures and accrued interest converted


394,661



-



-Issue of common stock for technology


1



-



-Issue of common stock for revenue interest


53,425Net liabilities assumed from acquisition


267,653



267,653



-Issue of common stock for investment


6,477,474



2,197,001



4,280,473






The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.




IAS Energy, Inc.
 (A Development Stage Company)
 Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
 December 13, 1994 (inception) through April 30, 2009 with
 December 13, 1994 (inception) through April 30, 2007 unaudited
 
 
 Class A Common Stock and Additional
Paid-In CapitalShares
#


Amount
$


Obligation
To issue
Shares
$


Deficit
Accumulated
During the
Development
Stage
$


Total
Stockholders’
Equity
(Deficit)
$Balance – 13 December 1994 (Date of inception)


-



-



-



-



-Shares issued for cash


100



10



-



-



10Shares issued for technology


6,000,000



1



-



-



1Stock issued for cash pursuant to:Private placement


700,000



70,000



-



-



70,000Public offering memorandum


336,333



252,250



-



-



252,250Net loss for the period


-



-



-



(83,615
)


(83,615
)Balance – April 30, 1995


7,036,433



322,261



-



(83,615
)


238,646Shares previously issued, donated back and cancelled


(100
)


(10
)


-



-



(10
)Shares issued for cash pursuant to options exercised


210,000



52,500



-



-



52,500Net loss for the year


-



-



-



(480,298
)


(480,298
)Balance – April 30, 1996


7,246,333



374,751



-



(563,913
)


(189,162
)Shares issued for cash pursuant to:Private placement


722,000



1,124,500



-



-



1,124,500Options exercised


224,000



140,500



-



-



140,500Shares issued for services


25,000



8,333



-



-



8,333Net loss for the year


-



-



-



(1,044,516
)


(1,044,516
)Balance – April 30, 1997


8,217,333



1,648,084



-



(1,608,429
)


39,655Shares issued for cash pursuant to:Public offering memorandum


263,667



197,750



-



-



197,750Options exercised


87,500



26,875



-



-



26,875Private placement


7,000



15,750



-



-



15,750Private placement and foreign units offering


575,600



1,007,300



-



-



1,007,300Shares issued for services


169,250



260,125



-



-



260,125





The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.






Net loss for the year


-



-



-



(1,633,047
)


(1,633,047
)Balance – April 30, 1998


9,320,350



3,155,884



-



(3,241,476
)


(85,592
)Shares issued for cash pursuant to:Options exercised


2,000



500



-



-



500Private placement and foreign units offering


95,000



166,250



-



-



166,250Private placement


200,000



200,000



-



-



200,000Exercise of warrants


48,000



84,000



-



-



84,000Shares issued for services


132,000



230,640



-



-



230,640Shares issued pursuant to conversion of convertible debentures including accrued interest


471,508



345,520



-



-



345,520Net loss for the year


-



-



-



(1,219,435
)


(1,219,435
)Balance – April 30, 1999


10,268,858



4,182,794



-



(4,460,911
)


(278,117
)





The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.




IAS Energy, Inc.
 (A Development Stage Company)
 Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
   
 
 
 Class A Common Stock and Additional
Paid-In CapitalShares
#


Amount
$


Obligation
To issue
Shares
$


Deficit
Accumulated
During the
Development
Stage
$


Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
$


Total
Stockholders’
Equity
(Deficit)
$Balance – April 30, 1999


10,268,858



4,182,794



-



(4,460,911
)


-



(278,117
)Shares issued for cash pursuant to:Private placement


968,902



484,451



-



-



-



484,451Options exercised


2,500



2,500



-



-



-



2,500Warrants exercised


18,125



30,938



-



-



-



30,938Shares issued pursuant to conversion of convertible debentures including accrued interest


62,854



38,266



-



-



-



38,266Net loss for the year


-



-



-



(572,169
)


-



(572,169
)Balance – April 30, 2000


11,321,239



4,738,949



-



(5,033,080
)


-



(294,131
)Shares issued to settle debt


267,048



211,781



-



-



-



211,781Shares issued pursuant to conversion of convertible debentures including accrued interest


12,358



10,875



-



-



-



10,875Net loss for the year


-



-



-



(755,406
)


-



(755,406
)Balance – April 30, 2001


11,600,645



4,961,605



-



(5,788,486
)


-



(826,881
)Net loss for the year


-



-



-



(752,321
)


-



(752,321
)Balance – April 30, 2002


11,600,645



4,961,605



-



(6,540,807
)


-



(1,579,202
)Shares issued for cash pursuant to a private placement


944,250



188,850



-



-



-



188,850Shares issued to settle related party debt


22,698,667



680,960



-



-



-



680,960Net income for the year


-



-



-



304,576



-



304,576Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities


-



-



-



-



4,800



4,800Balance – April 30, 2003


35,243,562



5,831,415



-



(6,236,231
)


4,800



(400,016
)





The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.





Net income for the year


-



-



-



119,993



-



119,993Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities


-



-



-



-



27,019



27,019Balance – April 30, 2004


35,243,562



5,831,415



-



(6,116,238
)


31,819



(253,004
)Net loss for the year


-



-



-



(42,726
)


-



(42,726
)Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities


-



-



-



-



44,178



44,178Balance – April 30, 2005


35,243,562



5,831,415



-



(6,158,964
)


75,997



(251,552
)Obligation to issue shares


-



-



53,425



-



-



53,425Net loss for the year


-



-



-



(59,428
)


-



(59,428
)Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities


-



-



-



-



140,700



140,700Balance – April 30, 2006


35,243,562



5,831,415



53,425



(6,218,392
)


216,697



(116,855
)




The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.




IAS Energy, Inc.
 (A Development Stage Company)
 Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
    
 
 Class A Common Stock and Additional
Paid-In CapitalShares
#


Amount
$


Obligation
To issue
Shares
$


Deficit
Accumulated
During the
Development
Stage
$


Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
$


Total
Stockholders’
Equity
(Deficit)
$Balance – April 30, 2006


35,243,562



5,831,415



53,425



(6,218,392
)


216,697



(116,855
)Shares issued pursuant to oil revenue agreement


279,477



53,425



(53,425
)


-



-



-Shares issued for cash pursuant to a private placement


500,000



200,000



-



-



-



200,000Obligation to issue shares


-



-



62,446



-



-



62,446Stock-based compensation


-



48,710



-



-



-



48,710Net loss for the year


-



-



-



(24,619
)


-



(24,619
)Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities


-



-



-



-



(18,332
)


(18,332
)Reclassification adjustment on sale of available-for-sale securities


-



-



-



-



(120,000
)


(120,000
)Balance – April 30, 2007


36,023,039



6,133,550



62,446



(6,243,011
)


78,365



31,350Shares issued for cash pursuant to:Private placement


58,000



21,903



-



-



-



21,903Options exercised


137,500



27,500



-



-



-



27,500Warrants exercised


40,000



16,000



-



-



-



16,000Shares issued for services


149,500



74,075



-



-



-



74,075Settlement of obligation to issue shares


-



107,500



-



-



-



107,500Shares issued pursuant to exercise of option to purchase investment in Power Telecom (Note 3)


22,000,000



4,280,473



-



-



-



4,280,473Fair value of warrants issued for services


-



18,681



-



-



-



18,681Common stock subscribed


-



-



4,000



-



-



4,000Obligation to issue shares


-



-



80,892



-



-



80,892Stock-based compensation


-



90,671



-



-



-



90,671Net loss for the year


-



-



-



(945,351
)


-



(945,351
)Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities


-



-



-



-



(39,395
)


(39,395
)Reclassification adjustment on sale of available-for-sale securities


-



-



-



-



(2,320
)


(2,320
)







The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.









Balance – April 30, 2008


58,408,039



10,770,353



147,338



(7,188,362
)


36,650



3,765,979Adjustment to beginning balances due to immaterial errors in prior periods


-



(121,763
)


-



121,763



-



-Settlement of obligation to issue shares


505,778



147,338



(147,338
)Shares issued for cash


100,000



20,000



-







-



20,000Shares issued pursuant to option exercise


50,000



2,500



-



-



-



2,500Shares issued pursuant to exercise of option to purchase investment in Power Telecom (Note 3)


11,000,000



2,197,001



-



-



-



2,197,001Stock-based compensation


-



135,630



-



-



-



135,630Net loss for the year


-



-



-



(659,111
)


-



(659,111
)Foreign company translation adjustment


-



-



-



-



(1,664
)


(1,664
)Unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities


-



-



-



-



(100,824
)


(100,824
)Balance – April 30, 2009


70,063,817



13,151,059



-



(7,725,710
)


(65,838
)


5,359,511




The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
 
  IAS Energy, Inc.
 (A Development Stage Company)
 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
  Note 1.
 
 Nature of Business
  IAS Energy, Inc. was incorporated on 13 December 1994 pursuant to the Laws of the State of Oregon. The Company is a Development Stage Company, as defined by Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 7, “Accounting and Reporting by Development Stage Enterprises”. On May 24, 2007, the Company changed
its name to IAS Energy, Inc.  The Company has minimal oil and gas revenues and is acquiring and developing a video-sharing website, as described in Note 3.
 
 These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its 60% owned subsidiary, Power Telecom Limited (“Power Telecom”), since the date the Company acquired control on September 3, 2008.
 
 In a development stage company, management devotes most of its activities to establishing a new business, including raising capital to acquire interest in the website. Planned principle activities have not yet produced any revenues and the Company has suffered operating losses as is normal in development stage companies. See Note 2.
 
 Significant Accounting Policies
 
 Basis of Presentation
 
 These consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and are expressed in U.S. dollars.
 
 Principles of consolidation
 
 These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its 60% owned subsidiary, Power Telecom Limited (“Power Telecom”), since the date the Company acquired control on September  3, 2008. Prior to that date, the Company’s investment in  Power Telecom was accounted for using
the equity method of accounting. For fiscal year ended April 30, 2009, all inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated on consolidation. The non-controlling interest in the common shares of Power Telecom is zero at April 30, 2009 due to Power Telecom’s negative historical shareholders’ equity.
 Fiscal period
 
 The Company’s fiscal year ends on April 30.
 
 Reclassifications
 
 Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
 
 Risks and uncertainties
 The Company operates in an emerging industry that is subject to market acceptance and technological change.  The Company’s operations are subject to significant risks and uncertainties, including financial, operational, technological and other risks associated with operating an emerging business, including the potential
risk of business failure.








IAS Energy, Inc.
 (A Development Stage Company)
 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements




Cash and cash equivalents
 
 Cash and cash equivalents include highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less.
 
 Available-for-sale securities
 
 Available-for-sale securities are recorded at market. Unrealized gains and losses on such securities are reported in comprehensive income in the period they occur.
 
 Basic and diluted net loss per share
 
 The Company computes net loss per share in accordance with SFAS No. 128, “Earnings per Share”.  SFAS No. 128 requires presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) on the face of the income statement.  Basic EPS is computed by dividing net loss available to common shareholders
(numerator) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding (denominator) during the period.  Diluted EPS gives effect to all potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method and convertible preferred stock using the if-converted method.  In computing diluted EPS, the average stock price for the period is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants.  Diluted EPS
excludes all potentially dilutive shares if their effect is anti-dilutive. For the years ended April 30, 2009 and 2008, potential dilutive securities had an anti-dilutive effect and were not included in the calculation of diluted net loss per common share.
 
 Investment
 
 Equity investments in other companies in which the Company exercises significant influence but not control and is not the primary beneficiary are accounted for using the equity method whereby the financial statements include the Company’s share of income (loss) of the investee.





(i)
Fair Value





The carrying values of cash, accounts receivable, available-for-sale securities, accrued revenues, accounts payable, accrued liabilities, due to/from related parties and debentures approximate their fair values because of the short-term maturity of these financial instruments.





(ii)
Interest Rate Risk





The Company is not exposed to significant interest rate risk due to the short-term maturity of its monetary assets and liabilities.





(iii)
Credit Risk





The Company’s financial asset that is exposed to credit risk consists primarily of cash. To manage the risk, cash is placed with major financial institutions.














IAS Energy, Inc.
 (A Development Stage Company)
 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements




(iv)
Currency Risk
 The Company’s functional and reporting currency is the U.S. dollar. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated using the exchange rate prevailing at the balance sheet date. Gains and losses arising on translation or settlement of foreign currency denominated transactions or balances are included
in the determination of income. The Company has not, to the date of these financial statements, entered into derivative instruments to offset the impact of foreign currency fluctuations.
 
 Goodwill
 
 The Company periodically reviews the carrying value of intangible assets not subject to amortization, including goodwill, to determine whether impairment may exist. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (“FAS 142”) requires that goodwill and certain intangible assets be assessed
annually, or when certain triggering events occur, for impairment using fair value measurement techniques. These events could include a significant change in the business climate, legal factors, a decline in operating performance, competition, sale or disposition of a significant portion of the business, or other factors. Specifically, goodwill impairment is determined using a two-step process. The first step of the goodwill impairment test is used to identify potential impairment by comparing the fair value
of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. The estimates of fair value of a reporting unit are determined using various valuation techniques with the primary technique being a discounted cash flow analysis. A discounted cash flow analysis requires one to make various judgmental assumptions including assumptions about future cash flows, growth rates, and discount rates. The assumptions about future cash flows and growth rates are based on the Company’s budget and long-term plans. Discount
rate assumptions are based on an assessment of the risk inherent in the respective reporting units. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is considered not impaired and the second step of the impairment test is unnecessary. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. The second step of the goodwill impairment test compares
the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination. That is, the fair value of the reporting unit is allocated to all of the assets and liabilities of
that unit as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the fair value of the reporting unit was the purchase price paid to acquire the reporting unit. The Company’s evaluation of goodwill completed during the year ended April 30, 2009 resulted in no impairment losses.
 
 Asset retirement obligation
 
 The Company is required to recognize a legal liability for obligations related to the retirement of property, plant and equipment and obligations arising from the acquisition, construction, development or normal operations of those assets.  Such asset retirement costs must be recognized at fair value when a reasonable estimate
of fair value can be estimated in the period in which the liability is incurred.  A corresponding increase to the carrying amount of the related asset, when one is identifiable, is recorded and amortized over the life of the asset.  Where a related future value is not easily identifiable with a liability, the change in fair value over the course of the year is expensed.  The amount of the liability is subject to re-measurement at each reporting period.  The estimates are
based principally on legal and regulatory requirements.  It is possible that the Company’s estimates of its ultimate reclamation and closure liabilities could change as a result of changes in regulations, changes in the extent of environmental remediation required, changes in the means of reclamation or changes in cost estimates.  Changes in













IAS Energy, Inc.
 (A Development Stage Company)
 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements




estimates are accounted for prospectively commencing in the period the estimate is revised. At April 30, 2009 and 2008, no asset retirement obligation was recorded.
 
 Stock-based compensation
 
 The Company records stock-based compensation in accordance with SFAS No. 123R, “Share Based Payments”, using the fair value method.
 
 All transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. Equity instruments issued to employees and the cost of the services
received as consideration are measured and recognized based on the fair value of the equity instruments issued.
 
 Oil and gas properties
 
 The Company utilizes the full-cost method of accounting for petroleum and natural gas properties. Under this method, the Company capitalizes all costs associated with acquisition, exploration and development of oil and natural gas reserves, including leasehold acquisition costs, geological and geophysical expenditures, lease rentals on
undeveloped properties and costs of drilling of productive and non-productive wells into the full-cost pool on a country-by-country basis. When the Company obtains proven oil and gas reserves, capitalized costs, including estimated future costs to develop the proved reserves and estimated abandonment costs, net of salvage, are depleted on the units-of-production method using estimates of proved reserves.
 
 The costs of unproved properties are not amortized until it is determined whether proved reserves can be assigned to the properties. Until such determination is made the Company assesses annually whether impairment has occurred, and includes in the amortization base drilling exploratory dry holes associated with unproved properties.
 
 The Company applies a ceiling test to the capitalized cost in the full-cost pool. The ceiling test limits such cost to the estimated present value, using a ten percent discount rate, of the future net revenue from proved reserves, based on current economic and operating conditions. Specifically, the Company computes the ceiling test so
that capitalized cost, less accumulated depletion and related deferred income tax, do not exceed an amount (the ceiling) equal to the sum of: (A) the present value of estimated future net revenue computed by applying current prices of oil and gas reserves (with consideration of price changes only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to estimated future production of proved oil and gas reserves as of the date of the latest balance sheet presented, less estimated future expenditures (based on current
cost) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved reserves computed using a discount factor of ten percent and assuming continuation of existing economic conditions; plus (B) the cost of property not being amortized; plus (C) the lower of cost or estimated fair value of unproven properties included in the costs being amortized; less (D) income tax effects related to differences between the book and tax basis of the property.
 
 For unproven properties, the Company excludes from capitalized costs subject to depletion all costs directly associated with the acquisition and evaluation of the unproved property until it is determined whether proved reserves can be assigned to the property. Until such a determination is made, the Company assesses the property at least
annually to ascertain whether impairment has occurred. In assessing impairment the Company considers factors such as historical experience and other data such as primary lease terms of the property, average holding periods of unproved property, and geographic and geologic data. The Company adds the amount of impairment assessed to the cost to be amortized subject to the ceiling test.















IAS Energy, Inc.
 (A Development Stage Company)
 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements




For the periods presented, there were no proved reserves reported due to the nature of the producing wells. As a result, all costs that would be capitalized during the periods was impaired immediately.
 
 Revenue recognition
 
 The Company recognizes oil and gas revenue under the sales method when production is sold at a fixed or determinable price, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred and title has transferred, and collectability is reasonably assured.
 
 Research and development
 
 The costs incurred in connection with the development of new products and manufacturing methods are charged to selling, general and administrative expenses as incurred. During the years ended April 30, 2009 and 2008, $2,000 and $3,000, respectively, were expensed as research and development costs.
 
 Income taxes
 
 Deferred income taxes are reported for timing differences between items of income or expense reported in the financial statements and those reported for income tax purposes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “ Accounting for Income Taxes ”, which requires the use of the asset/liability method of accounting for income taxes. Deferred
income taxes and tax benefits are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, and for tax losses and credit carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The Company provides for deferred taxes for the
estimated future tax effects attributable to temporary differences and carry-forwards when realization is more likely than not.
 
 Use of estimates
 
 The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements,
and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.  The Company regularly evaluates estimates and assumptions related to useful life and recoverability of long-lived assets, goodwill, stock-based compensation and deferred income tax asset valuation allowances.  The Company bases its estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that it believes to be reasonable
under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the accrual of costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources.  The actual results experienced by the Company may differ materially and adversely from the Company’s estimates.  To the extent there are material differences between the estimates and the actual results, future results of operations will be affected.
 
 Recent accounting pronouncements
 
 In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)” (“SFAS 167”).  SFAS No. 167 is intended to establish general standards of financial reporting for companies with variable interest entities.  It requires timely and useful disclosure of information related
to the Company’s involvement with variable interest entities.  This disclosure should alert all users to the effects on specific provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest











IAS Energy, Inc.
 (A Development Stage Company)
 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements




Entities, related to the changes to the special-purpose entity proposal in FASB Statement No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, and the treatment of specific provisions of Interpretation 46(R).  SFAS No. 167 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November
15, 2009.  The Company has determined that the adoption of SFAS No. 167 will have no impact on its consolidated financial statements.
 
 In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, “Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets—an amendment of FASB Statement” (“SFAS 166”).  SFAS No. 166 is intended to establish standards of financial reporting for the transfer of assets and transferred assets to improve the relevance, representational
faithfulness, and comparability.  SFAS 166 was established to clarify derecognition of assets under FASB Statement No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities.  SFAS No. 166 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2009.  The Company has determined that the adoption of SFAS No. 166 will have no impact on its consolidated financial statements.
 
 In May 2009, the FSAB issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events (“SFAS No. 165”). SFAS No. 165 is intended to establish general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date, but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued.  It requires the disclosure
of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis for that date–that is, whether that date represents the date the financial statements were issued or were available to be issued. This disclosure should alert all users of financial statements that an entity has not evaluated subsequent events after that date in the set of financial statements being presented.  SFAS No. 165 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods ending after
June 15, 2009.  The Company has determined that the adoption of SFAS No. 165 will have no impact on its consolidated financial statements.
  In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133”, which amends and expands the disclosure requirements of SFAS 133 to provide an enhanced understanding of an entity’s use of derivative instruments, how they are accounted for
under SFAS 133 and their effect on the entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows.  The provisions of SFAS 161 are effective for periods beginning after 15 November 2008.  The Company is currently reviewing the effect, if any, that the adoption of this statement will have to the Company’s financial statements.
  In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements – an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51” (“SFAS 160”).  SFAS 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards for ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other
than the parent, the amount of consolidated net income attributable and to the noncontrolling interest, changes in a parent’s ownership interest, and the valuation of retained noncontrolling equity investments when a subsidiary is deconsolidated.  SFAS 160 also establishes disclosure requirements that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners.  SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after 15 December
2008.  The Company is currently reviewing the effect, if any, that the adoption of this statement will have to the Company’s financial statements.
  In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business Combinations” (“SFAS No. 141(R)”). SFAS No. 141(R) establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any noncontrolling
interest in the acquiree and the goodwill acquired. SFAS No. 141(R) also establishes disclosure requirements to enable the evaluation of the nature and financial effects of the business combination. SFAS No. 141(R) is effective for fiscal years beginning after 15 December 2008.  The











IAS Energy, Inc.
 (A Development Stage Company)
 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements







Company is currently evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of SFAS No. 141(R) on its consolidated results of operation and financial condition.
 
 In June 2008, FASB ratified EITF No. 07-05, Determining Whether an Instrument (or an Embedded Feature) Is Indexed to an Entity’s Own Stock (“EITF 07-05”). EITF 07-05 provides that an entity should use a two-step approach to evaluate whether an equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded feature) is indexed to its own
stock, including evaluating the instrument’s contingent exercise and settlement provisions. The Company has determined that the adoption of SFAS No. 165 will have no material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
 
 In May 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position APB No. 14-1, “Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement)” (“APB 14-1”), which applies to convertible debt that includes a cash conversion feature. Under APB 14-1, the liability and equity
components of convertible debt instruments within the scope of this pronouncement shall be separately accounted for in a manner that will reflect the entity’s nonconvertible debt borrowing rate when interest cost is recognized in subsequent periods. APB 14-1 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of FASB Staff Position No. 14-1 on its consolidated results of operation and financial condition.
 
 In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This pronouncement applies to other standards that require or permit fair value measurements. Accordingly, this statement does
not require any new fair value measurement. The provisions of SFAS 157 are effective for the Company on January 1, 2008. We have partially adopted FAS 157 as of January 1, 2008 except for those non-recurring measurements for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities subject to the partial deferral in FASB Statement of Position No. 157-2,  Partial Deferral of the Effective Date of Statement 157,”  (“FSP 157-2”).  The adoption of FAS 157 did not have
an impact on our consolidated financial position or operating results.   FSP 157-2 delays the effective date of FAS 157 from fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually).  The adoption of SFAS 157 is not expected to have a material impact on the
Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
 
 In May 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued SFAS No. 163, “Accounting for Financial Guarantee Insurance Contracts – an interpretation of SFAS 60”.  SFAS 163 provides enhanced guidance on the recognition and measurement to be used to account for premium revenue and claim
liabilities and related disclosures and is limited to financial guarantee insurance (and reinsurance) contracts, issued by enterprises included within the scope of SFAS 60, “Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises”.  SFAS 163 also requires that an insurance enterprise recognize a claim liability prior to an event of default when there is evidence that credit deterioration has occurred in an insured financial obligation.  SFAS 163 is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after 15 December 2008, with early application not permitted.  The Company does not expect SFAS 163 to have an impact on its consolidated financial statements.
 
 In June 2009, the FASB approved the “FASB Accounting Standards Codification” (the “Codification”) as the single source of authoritative non governmental U.S. GAAP to be launched on July 1, 2009. The Codification does not change current U.S. GAAP, but it is intended to simplify user access to all authoritative U.S.
GAAP by providing all the authoritative literature related to a particular topic in one place. All existing accounting standard documents will be superseded and all other accounting literature











IAS Energy, Inc.
 (A Development Stage Company)
 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements







not included in the Codification will be considered non authoritative. The Codification is effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Company does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
 
 Note 2.                      Going Concern
 
 The Company has a net loss of $659,111 during the year ended April 30, 2009 an accumulated losses of $7,725,710 since its inception. The Company also has working capital deficit of $1,659,081 at April 30, 2009. These factors raise substantial doubt about the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial
statements have been prepared on a going basis and do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
 
 At April 30, 2009, the Company has suffered losses from development stage activities to date.  Although management is currently attempting to implement its business plan, and is seeking additional sources of equity or debt financing, there is no assurance these activities will be successful.
 
 Note 3.                       Acquisition
 
 On November 26, 2007, the Company entered into an Equity Share Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) with all of the stockholders of Power Telecom, a corporation organized under the laws of Hong Kong. Pursuant to the Agreement the Company, at its option, has the right to purchase all of the issued and outstanding shares of capital
stock of Power Telecom (the “Shares”).  The consideration to be paid under the Agreement consists of 55,000,000 Class A shares of common stock of the Company and the Company is required to make cash payments to Power Telecom totaling $650,000 towards the further development of Power Telecom’s business.  Power Telecom owns the rights to the Chinese website www.video1314.com, an information sharing website.  The
Company paid a non-refundable deposit of $50,000 to Power Telecom upon execution of the Agreement and an additional $300,000 capital contribution. . Pursuant to the Agreement, the Company received a series of irrevocable exclusive options to purchase up to 100% of the shares of Power Telecom in stages as described below:




(i)
To purchase an initial 20% interest in Power Telecom, the Company must issue 10,000,000 Class A common shares, pay $50,000 to Power Telecom and issue 1,000,000 Class A common shares as a finder’s fee. The Company exercised this option on November 26, 2007. The 11,000,000 common shares issued were recorded at a fair value of $1,880,032.
  (ii)
To purchase an additional 20% interest in Power Telecom, the Company must issue an additional 10,000,000 Class A common shares, pay a further $100,000 to Power Telecom, and issue an additional 1,000,000 Class A common shares as a finder’s fee. The Company exercised this option on March 5, 2008. The 11,000,000 common shares issued were recorded at a fair value of $2,400,441.
  (iii)
To purchase an additional 20% interest in Power Telecom, the Company must issue an additional 10,000,000 Class A common shares, pay a further $150,000 to Power Telecom, and issue an additional 1,000,000 Class A common shares as a finder’s fee. The Company exercised this option on September 3, 2008. The 11,000,000 common shares issued were recorded at a fair value of $2,197,001.
  (iv)
To purchase an additional 20% interest in Power Telecom, the Company must issue an additional 10,000,000 Class A common shares, pay a further $150,000 to Power Telecom, and issue an additional 1,000,000 Class A common shares as a finder’s fee.











IAS Energy, Inc.
 (A Development Stage Company)
 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements





(v)
To purchase an additional 20% interest in Power Telecom, the Company must issue an additional 10,000,000 Class A common shares, pay a further $150,000 to Power Telecom, and issue an additional 1,000,000 Class A common shares as a finder’s fee.




In accordance with SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations,” acquisitions of a controlling interest are accounted for under the purchase method of accounting.  Under the purchase method of accounting, assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recorded at their estimated fair values.  Goodwill is recorded to
the extent the purchase price consideration, including certain acquisition and closing costs, exceeds the fair value of the net identifiable assets acquired at the date of the acquisition.
 
 Effective September 3, 2008, the Company owned a 60% interest in Power Telecom by having issued 33,000,000 Class A shares of common stock of the Company and making an equity contribution of $350,000 to Power Telecom for working capital purposes.
 
 Up until September 2, 2008, the Company’s 40% investment in Power Telecom was accounted for using the equity method with the Company’s share of losses being $76,535 since acquisition.  Upon purchasing the 60% interest, the acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method and the consolidated statements of operations
and cash flows include the results of operations of Power Telecom from September 3, 2008 to April 30, 2009.  The losses applicable to the non-controlling interest of Power Telecom have been allocated only to the Company’s interest as the losses exceed the non-controlling interest in the common shares of Power Telecom.
 
 The purchase price of the 60% interest of Power Telecom is detailed as follows:
  Capital contribution in cash

$
350,000Fair value of shares of IAS’s common stock:First tranche of 11 million shares


1,880,032Second Tranche of 11 million shares


2,400,441Third tranche of 11 million shares


2,197,001Loss in equity investment prior to September 3, 2008


(76,537
)Total Purchase Price

$
6,750,937
 
 The acquisition has been accounted for in accordance with the provision of SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations.” The total purchase price was allocated to the net tangible assets based on the estimated fair values. The final allocation of the purchase price is as follows:
  $Assets purchased:Cash and cash equivalents


13,960Receivables, prepaids and other current assets


2,562Goodwill


7,018,592Total assets acquired


7,035,114Liabilities assumed:Accounts payable and accrued liabilities


(284,177
)
   
  IAS Energy, Inc.
 (A Development Stage Company)
 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
  Total liabilities assumed


(284,177
)Purchase price


6,750,937
  Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair value of the assets acquired net of the fair value of liabilities assumed in an acquisition. SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (SFAS 142) requires that intangible assets with indefinite lives, including goodwill, be evaluated on an annual basis
for impairment or more frequently if an event occurs or circumstances change that could potentially result in impairment.  At April 30, 2008. The Company performed their annual test of goodwill for impairment. The goodwill was tested by performing the two-step impairment test. For the year ended April 30, 2009, no impairment was recorded.
 
 Goodwill recognized in the above transactions amounted to $7,018,592 and this amount is expected to be non-deductible for tax purposes.
 
 The shares issued for the above investment have the following restrictions:
  a)
Holding period of six months;
 
 (b)
After the six-month holding period, the number of shares to be sold during any 90-day period cannot exceed 1% of the outstanding shares of the same class;
 
 (c)
The sales must be handled as routine transactions with no solicitation; and
 
 (d)
A notice has to be filed with the SEC on Form 144 if the sale involves more than 500 shares or the aggregate dollar amount is greater than $10,000 in any 90-day period.
  The first tranche of 11,000,000 shares issued on November 26, 2007, used the five-day average trading price of $0.23, before the announcement was made 23 October 2007, in the calculation of the fair value.
 
 The second tranche of 11,000,000 shares issued on March 5, 2008, used the five-day average trading price of $0.28 in the calculation of the fair value.
 
 The third tranche of 11,000,000 shares issued on July 30, 2008, used the five-day average trading price of $0.25 in the calculation of the fair value.
 Since these shares have trading restrictions, the aggregate fair value was calculated using the above prices, over the estimated time (based on trading restrictions) to achieve free trading status, using a 10% discount factor.
 
 Pro forma information
 
 The following consolidated pro forma financial information presents the combined results of operations of the Company and Power Telecom for the year ended 30 April 2009 as if the acquisitions had occurred at 1 May 2008, including the issuance of the Company’s common shares as consideration for the acquisition of Power Telecom.
   
  IAS Energy, Inc.
 (A Development Stage Company)
 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
 
 Consolidated Pro FormaYear
ended
April 30, 2009


Year
ended
April 30, 2008$



$Revenues


38,346



26,300Net loss


(748,576
)


(1,261,652
)Basic and diluted loss per common share


(0.01
)


(0.03
)
 
 
 The amounts of revenue and net loss of Power Telecom since the acquisition date included in the consolidated income statement for the year ended April 30, 2009 are $7,726 and ($166,395), respectively.
 
 The consolidated pro forma financial information does not include adjustments to remove certain private company expenses, which may not be incurred in future periods.  Similarly, the unaudited consolidated pro forma financial information does not include adjustments for additional expenses, such as rent, insurance, and other expenses
that would have been incurred subsequent to the acquisition date.   The unaudited consolidated pro forma financial information does not necessarily reflect the results of operations that would have occurred had the Company and Power Telecom been a single entity during these periods.
 
 As part of the Option Agreement, the Company granted 1,000,000 stock options as stock based compensation to the subsidiary’s key employees to purchase 1,000,000 Class A common shares of the Company at a price of $0.33 per share for a period of five years. The 1,000,000 stock options were recorded at a fair value of $267,954.
The options vest as to 12.5% upon grant date and an additional 12.5% every 90 days thereafter. Refer to Note 9.
 
 Change in control
 
 Per the Option Agreement dated November 26, 2007 (Option Agreement) between the Company, Mr. Samuel Kam, a businessman and the shareholders of Biotonus Clinique Bon Port (Hong Kong) Limited, who collectively owns 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of Power Telecom, upon the exercise of the fourth option as described above, Mr. Samuel
Kam and the shareholders of Biotonus Clinique Bon Port (Hong Kong) Limited will own the majority shares of common stock of the Company.
 
 In addition, pursuant to the Option Agreement, upon the Company fully exercising the options described above, the Board of Directors of the Company shall consist of five persons, three to be nominated by Mr. Samuel Kam and the shareholders of Biotonus Clinique Bon Port (Hong Kong) Limited and two to be nominated by John Robertson, the current
President of the Company. From the  Option Agreement until the earlier of the date that the Company has fully exercised the options and December 31, 2013, Mr.  Samuel Kam and the shareholders of Biotonus Clinique Bon Port (Hong Kong) Limited covenant to vote their shares of the Company in favor of the composition of the Board of Directors of the Company as John Robertson, the current President of IAS, shall so direct in writing. Thus the control of the company will remain with Mr. John Robertson
at least before December 31, 2013.  The Company does not intend to exercise any further options to acquire any further interest in Power Telecom.




IAS Energy, Inc.
 (A Development Stage Company)
 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements




Note 4.                      Asset Retirement Obligation
 
 The total future asset retirement obligation (“ARO”) was estimated by management based on the Company’s net ownership interest in all wells and facilities, estimated costs to reclaim and abandon the wells and facilities, and the estimated timing of the costs to be incurred in future periods.  Although the Company’s
wells are producing, the Company has estimated the total ARO to be $Nil As of April 30, 2009 (April 30, 2008 - $Nil) because the costs to be incurred in shutting down the wells are estimated to be minimal.
 
 Note 5.                      Related Party Transactions
 
 Amounts due to and from related parties are unsecured, non-interest bearing and due on demand. Related parties consist of companies controlled or significantly influenced by the President of the Company.
 As of April 30, 2009, the Company was owed by related companies controlled or significantly influenced by the President of the Company $8,108 (April 30, 2008 - $21,139) comprised of advances and/or expenses paid by the Company.  The amounts are non-interest bearing, unsecured and without specific terms of repayment.
 
 As of April 30, 2009, the Company owed related companies controlled or significantly influenced by the President of the Company $1,305,619 (April 30, 2008 - $830,021) comprised of advances and/or expenses paid on behalf of the Company.  The amounts are non-interest bearing, unsecured and without specific terms of repayment.
 
 As of April 30, 2009, the Company paid fees to a professional law firm in which a partner of the firm is an officer and director of the Company for legal services amounting to $28,400 (2008 - $27,191).
 
 On April 7, 2008, the Company entered into an agreement with Teryl Resources Corp. (“Teryl”), a related company, to sell to Teryl the remaining 40% working interest in the three gas wells located in Know and Laurel Counties, Kentucky.  In consideration, the Company received an initial payment of $25,000 and the balance
will be determined after an independent valuation report prepared by a qualified petroleum geologist.  During the year, both parties agreed to indefinitely suspend the agreement due to the difficulty of obtaining an independent valuation report due to the vertical fracture of the wells.  As such, the $25,000 paid to the Company is due to Teryl.
 
 During the year ended April 30, 2009, the Company sold nil (2008 - 4,000) shares of a related company for net proceeds of nil (2008 - $2,240).
 
 The Company shares office space with companies with related directors and officers.  The Company occupied this space rent-free during the year ended April 30, 2009.
 
 Note 6.                      Debentures
 
 On 15 June 1997, the Company offered, in a private placement a three year, 8- 3/4% interest rate, convertible debenture to raise $500,000, of which $40,000 was sold prior to closing.  Interest is paid annually and the debenture is convertible into Class "A" common shares at $2.50, 3.00 and $3.50 on June 15, 1998, 1999
and 2000, respectively.  In the event the shares are trading below $4.00 per share over a ten-day average prior to exercising into shares of the Company during the last month of the third year, the convertible debenture will be exercisable at 20 % below the said ten-day average.  The maturity date was June 15, 2000.




IAS Energy, Inc.
 (A Development Stage Company)
 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements




Of the $40,000 noted above, $15,000 was redeemed as April 30, 2000. As of April 30, 2009, $25,000 of debentures remains outstanding.  Interest is due annually.  The company evaluated this instrument under FAS 133 and EITF 00-19 to determine whether the conversion feature should be bifurcated and accounted for as derivative
liability. Based on this evaluation, the conversion feature was not bifurcated. The company then evaluated the convertible portion under EITF’s 98-5 and 00-27 for consideration of beneficial conversion feature and determined none existed.
 
 Note 7.                      Available-For-Sale-Securities
 
 Year Ended
April 30, 2009


Year Ended
April 30, 2008Cost
$


Gross
Unrealized
Losses
$


Fair Value
$


Cost
$


Gross
Unrealized
Gains
$


Fair Value
$Available-for-sale  security


125,939



(64,174
)


61,765



125,939



36,650



162,589
 
 The above available-for-sale securities have been accounted for using the fair value method. The Company did not have any sales during the year ended April 30, 2009.
 
 Note 8.                      Common Stock
  (a)
During the year ended April 30, 2009, the Company issued 50,000 Class A common shares at $0.05 per share upon the exercise of stock options for proceeds of $2,500.
 
 (b)
On 5 September 2008, the Company issued 100,000 units at $0.20 per unit pursuant to a private placement for cash proceeds of $20,000, received during the three month period ended 31 July 2008.  Each unit consists of one Class A common share and one share purchase warrant.  Each warrant enables the holder to purchase one additional share
at an exercise price of $0.25 per share for one year, expiring on 5 September 2009.
 
 (c)
On 30 July 2008, in accordance with the terms of the option agreement as described in Note 3, the Company issued 10,000,000 Class A common shares to acquire 20% of Power Telecom. In addition, 1,000,000 Class A common shares were issued as a finder’s fee. The fair value of the total shares issued is $2,197,001.











IAS Energy, Inc.
 (A Development Stage Company)
 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
 
  (d)
On 21 July 2008, the Company issued 495,778 Class A common shares to a private company controlled by the President of the Company to fulfill its obligation per agreement, as described in Note 11(a).
 
 (e)
On 28 May 2008, the Company issued 10,000 units at $0.40 per unit pursuant to a private placement for cash proceeds of $4,000, received during the April 30, 2008 year end.  Each unit consists of one Class A common share and one share purchase warrant.  Each warrant enables the holder to purchase one additional Class A common share at
an exercise price of $0.50 per share for one year, expiring 28 May 2009.
 
 (f)
On 5 March 2008, in accordance with the terms of the option agreement as described in Note 3, the Company issued 10,000,000 Class A common shares to acquire 20% of Power Telecom. In addition, 1,000,000 Class A common shares were issued as a finder’s fee. The fair value of the total shares issued is $2,400,441.
 
 (g)
On 12 February 2008, the Company issued 33,000 units at $0.40 per unit pursuant to a private placement for cash proceeds of $12,704, net of issue costs of $496. Each unit consists of one Class A common share and one share purchase warrant.  Each warrant enables the holder to purchase an additional share at an exercise price of $0.50 per share
for one year, expiring on 12 February 2009.
 
 (h)
On 28 January 2008, the Company issued 25,000 units at $0.40 per unit pursuant to a private placement for cash proceeds of $9,199, net of issue costs of $801. Each unit consists of one Class A common share and one share purchase warrant.  Each warrant enables the holder to purchase on additional share at an exercise price of $0.50 per share for
one year, expiring on 28 January 2009.
 
 (i)
On 26 November 2007, in accordance with the terms of the option agreement as described in Note 3, the Company issued 10,000,000 Class A common shares to acquire 20% of Power Telecom. In addition, 1,000,000 Class A common shares were issued as a finder’s fee. The fair value of the total shares issued is $1,880,032.
 
 (j)
On 29 October 2007, the Company issued 49,500 Class A common shares for services with a fair value of $42,075.
 
 (k)
On 31 August 2007, the Company issued 100,000 units, each unit consisting of one Class A common share and one share purchase warrant, for services. Each warrant entitles the holder to acquire one additional Class A share for $0.40, until 31 August 2009. The fair value of the shares and warrants were $32,000 and $18,681, respectively.
 
 (l)
During the year ended April 30, 2008, the Company issued 137,500 Class A common shares at $0.20 per share upon the exercise of stock options for proceeds of $27,500.
 
 (m)
During the year ended April 30, 2008, the Company issued 40,000 Class A common shares at $0.40 per share upon the exercise of warrants for proceeds of $16,000.




Note 9.                      Stock Option Plan
 
 The Company has a Stock Option Plan to issue up to 2,500,000 Class “A” common shares to certain key directors and employees, approved and registered October 2, 1996, as amended. Pursuant to the Plan, the Company has granted stock options to certain directors and employees.











IAS Energy, Inc.
 (A Development Stage Company)
 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements




On October 22, 2007, the Company approved the 2007 Stock Option Plan to issue up to 2,000,000 Class “A” common shares to directors and employees and registered them on Form S-8 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).
 
 During the year ended April 30, 2007, the Company extended the term on 1,200,000 options held by directors for a further five years. The fair value of the options was estimated at the date of extension using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following weighted average assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 4.59%, expected
volatility of 229%, an expected option life of 5 years and no expected dividends. The weighted average fair value of options granted was $0.25 per option.
 
 The fair value of the original options was deducted from the fair value of the modified options for a difference of $194,840. During the year ended April 30, 2009, $nil (2008 - $4,059) stock-based compensation expense was charged to operations for the vested incremental increase in the fair value of these stock options. The balance of $142,071
(2008 - $142,071) of unrecognized compensation cost related to the non-vested stock options held by the employees will be recognized over future periods.
 
 On February 12, 2009, the Company granted 50,000 stock options from the 2007 Stock Option Plan to an employee exercisable at $0.20 per share, up to February 12, 2014. The fair value of options was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following weighted average assumptions: risk free interest
rate of 1.28%, expected volatility of 185%, an expected option life of 2.5 years and no expected dividends.
 
 These options vest as follows:




[i]
25% of the options vest upon granting of the option; such initial vest is referred to as the “First Vesting”;[ii]
The second 25% of the options vest 90 days from the date of exercise of the First Vesting; such second vesting is referred to as the “Second Vesting”;[iii]
The third 25% of the options vest 90 days from the date of exercise of the Second Vesting; such third vesting is referred to as the “Third Vesting”;[iv]
The fourth and final 25% of the options vest 90 days from the date of the exercise of the Third Vesting; and[v]
The options expire 60 months from the date of grant.




On April 1, 2009, the Company granted 200,000 common stock options from the 2007 Stock Option Plan to a consultant exercisable at $0.05 per share, up to April 1, 2010. The fair value of options was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following weighted average assumptions: risk free interest
rate of 0.41%, expected volatility of 224.44%, an expected option life of 1/2 years and no expected dividends.These options vest as follows:




[i]
25% of the options vest upon granting of the option; such initial vest is referred to as the “First Vesting”;[ii]
The second 25% of the options vest 30 days from the date of exercise of the First Vesting; such second vesting is referred to as the “Second Vesting”;











IAS Energy, Inc.
 (A Development Stage Company)
 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements






[iii]
The third 25% of the options vest 30 days from the date of exercise of the Second Vesting; such third vesting is referred to as the “Third Vesting”;[iv]
The fourth and final 25% of the options vest 30 days from the date of the exercise of the Third Vesting; and[v]
The options expire 12 months from the date of grant.




During the year ended April 30, 2008, the Company granted 1,000,000 options in accordance with the terms of the option agreement as described in Note 3. The fair value of the options was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following weighted average assumptions: risk-free interest rate of
3.73%, expected volatility of 163%, an expected option life of 2.5 years and no expected dividends. The weighted average fair value of options granted was $0.27 per option. During the year ended April 30, 2009, $133,977 (2008 - $66,988) stock- based compensation expense was charged to operations, and the balance of $66,989 (2008 - $200,966) of unrecognized compensation cost related to the non-vested stock options will be recognized over future periods as they vest.These options have the following vesting schedule:




[i]
12.5% of the options vest on the day that the Company issues 10,000,000 of its shares to Power Telecom as per the option agreement. Refer to Note 3;[ii]
Every 90 days thereafter, an additional 12.5% of the grant shall vest; and[iii]
The options expire 60 months from the date of grant.




During the year ended April 30, 2008, the Company granted 100,000 options pursuant to the 2007 Stock Option Plan. The fair value of the options was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following weighted average assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 3.49%, expected volatility of 166%, an
expected option life of 2.5 years and no expected dividends. The options have an exercise price of $0.96 for a period of five years expiring November 7, 2012. The weighted average fair value of options granted was $0.78 per option. During the year ended April 30, 2009, $nil (2008 - $19,624) stock-based compensation expense was charged to operations, and the balance of $58,871 of unrecognized compensation cost related to the non-vested stock options will be recognized over future periods as they vest.
 
 These options have the following vesting schedule:




[i]
25% of the options vest upon granting of the option; such initial vest is referred to as the “First Vesting”;[ii]
The second 25% of the options vest 90 days from the date of exercise of the First Vesting; such second vesting is referred to as the “Second Vesting”;[iii]
The third 25% of the options vest 90 days from the date of exercise of the Second Vesting; such third vesting is referred to as the “Third Vesting”;[iv]
The fourth and final 25% of the options vest 90 days from the date of exercise of the Third Vesting; and[v]
The options expire 60 months from the date of grant.











IAS Energy, Inc.
 (A Development Stage Company)
 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements




At April 30, 2009, there was $273,352 (2008-$401,908) of total unrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested stock options granted under the Plans, which are expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 36 months.  The total fair value of stock options vested during the year ended April 30, 2009 and 2008
was $135,630 and $90,671, respectively.
 
 A summary of the Company’s stock option activity for the years ended April 30, 2009 and 2008 is as follows:
 April 30, 2009


April 30, 2008Weighted





WeightedAverage





AverageExercise





ExerciseOptions


Price


Options


PriceOutstanding at beginning of year


2,212,500


$
0.29



1,250,000


$
0.20Granted


250,000



0.08



1,100,000



0.39Exercised


(50,000
)


0.05



(137,500
)


0.20Expired


(37,500
)


0.20



-



-Cancelled


-



-



-



-Outstanding at end of year


2,375,000


$
0.28



2,212,500


$
0.29Exercisable at end of year


987,500


$
0.32



512,500


$
0.30Weighted average fair value of options granted





$
0.08






$
0.39
 
 At April 30, 2009, the range of exercise prices and the weighted average remaining contractual life of the outstanding options was $0.20 to $0.96 per share and 2.93 years, respectively. The intrinsic value of “in the money” options at April 30, 2009 was $99,000.


Additional information regarding options outstanding and exercisable as at April 30, 2009 is as follows:
  Options OutstandingWeighted AverageAggregate


RemainingExercise


Shares Under


Intrinsic


Contractual LifeExpiry Date

Price


Option


Value


(in years)$


#


$


#April 01, 2010


0.05



150,000



31,500



0.92November 20, 2011


0.20



1,075,000



64,500



2.56October 23, 2012


0.33



1,000,000



–



3.48February 12, 2014


0.20



50,000



3,000



4.79November 7, 2012


0.96



100,000



–



3.53Options outstanding






2,375,000



99,000



2.93









IAS Energy, Inc.
 (A Development Stage Company)
 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
 Options ExercisableWeighted AverageAggregate


RemainingExercise


Shares Under


Intrinsic


Contractual LifeExpiry Date

Price


Option


Value


(in years)$


#


$


#February 12, 2014


0.20



12,500



3,000



4.79November 20, 2011


0.20



200,000



3,870



2.56October 23, 2012


0.33



750,000



–



3.48November 7, 2012


0.96



25,000



–



3.53Options exercisable






987,500



6,870



3.18
  As at April 30, 2009, there was $273,352 (2008 - $401,908) of total unrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested stock options granted under the Plans, which are expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 35 months. The total fair value of stock options vested during the years ended April 30, 2009 and 2008 was
$135,630 and $90,671, respectively.
 
 The aggregate intrinsic value of all options exercised was $10,500 (2008 - $6,875).
 
 A summary of the status of the Company’s non-vested stock options as of April 30, 2009 and changes during the year ended April 30, 2009 is presented below:
 
 Weighted AverageGrant DateStock Options


Fair Value#


$Non-vested at May 1, 2008


1,700,000



0.29Vested


(562,500
)


0.24Granted


250,000



0.03Non-vested at April 30, 2009


1,387,500



0.20
 
 IAS Energy, Inc.
 (A Development Stage Company)
 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
 
 Note 10.                      Share Purchase Warrants
 
 The following table summarizes the continuity of the Company’s warrants for the year ended April 30, 2009 and 2008:
 
 April 30, 2009


April 30, 2008Weighted





WeightedAverage





AverageExercise





ExerciseWarrants


Price


Warrants


PriceOutstanding at beginning of period – 1 May 2008


368,000


$
0.42



250,000


$
0.40Granted


110,000



0.27



158,000



0.44Exercised


-



-



(40,000
)


0.40Expired


(268,000
)


0.42



-



-Cancelled


-



-



-



-Outstanding at end of period


210,000


$
0.33



368,000


$
0.42Exercisable at end of period


210,000


$
0.33



368,000


$
0.42
 
 As of April 30, 2009, the range of warrant prices for shares under warrants, the weighted average remaining contractual life and the aggregate intrinsic value are as follows:
 
 Weighted AverageContractual


Aggregate Intrinsic VaExercise


Number of


Life


IntrinsicExpiry Date

Price


Warrants


(in years)


Value$


#


#


$August 31, 2009


0.40



100,000



0.34



-May 28, 2009


0.50



10,000



0.08



-September 5, 2009


0.25



100,000



0.35



1,000210,000







1,000
 
 Note 11.                      Oil and Gas Properties
 
 (a)
The Company entered into an agreement dated 6 April 2005 with a private company controlled by the President of the Company to acquire a working interest in two oil wells located in Burleson County, Texas. The Company agreed to issue up to 1,000,000 shares (issued - 775,255 at April 30, 2009) of restricted common stock at the rate of one share for every $0.10 of revenue from the wells. The remaining 224,745 shares were
issued on July 31, 2009 (Refer to Note 14 (b)). To April 30, 2009, revenue from the wells was approximately $58,030. During the year ended April 30, 2009, the Company received/accrued $17,878 of revenue from the wells.
 
 The wells are producing but a value cannot be placed on them due to vertical fracture features that prevent the estimation of reserves. Accordingly, cumulative impairment loss of $199,335 equal to the investment in the oil wells that would have otherwise been recorded has been charged to operations. During the year ended April 30, 2009, $2,572
(April 30, 2008 - $80,892) of impairment loss was incurred.
 
 IAS Energy, Inc.
 (A Development Stage Company)
 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
 
 (b)
On 4 May 2006, the Company entered into an agreement with Energy Source Inc. (“ESI”) to drill up to 24 gas wells located in Kentucky. The Company can earn a 100% working interest (60% net revenue interest) in four gas wells by paying $185,000 per well and has the option to acquire a 100% working interest (60% net revenue interest) in an additional 20 wells over an 18-month period at a price to be agreed
upon. Each well is subject to a 12.5% net revenue interest to the landowner and a 27.5% interest to ESI.   On 18 May 2006, the Company entered into an agreement with Teryl, a public company related by common directors and officers, to farm-out a 40% working interest, outlined above, subject to a 12.5% net revenue interest to the landowner and a 27.5% interest to ESI, in consideration for paying 50% of the total costs of the wells.  The Company received $277,500 from Teryl during the year
ended April 30, 2007, representing 50% of the cost of drilling the first, second and third wells.  On 28 September 2006, the Company assigned a 20% working interest (12% net revenue interest) in the third well drilled as part of a financing agreement.
 
 To April 30, 2009, the Company’s portion of the revenue from the wells was approximately $41,873 (2008 - $31,697). During the year ended April 30, 2009, the Company received/accrued $10,176 (2008 - $17,205) of revenues from the wells, and recorded depletion of $nil (2008 - $1,470) on the capitalized costs relating to this area.
 
 Due to the nature of these wells, the Company is unable to estimate proved reserves. As a result all costs are impaired immediately. The total impairment for 2009 and 2008 was $nil and $273,426.
 
 Note 12.                      Income Tax
 
 The Company has losses carried forward for income tax purposes to April 30, 2009, however, the related deferred tax asset has been fully reserved due to management’s determination that the realization of the deferred tax assets is less than likely. The difference between the statutory tax rate and the effective tax rate is the valuation
allowance. In addition, the utilization of certain net operating losses may be limited due to the acquisition of Power Telecom.
 The composition of the Company’s deferred tax assets at April 30, 2009 and 2008 is as follows:
 
 April 30,2009


2008Net operating loss carry forward


7,248,481



6,725,000Statutory federal income tax rate


35%



35%Effective income tax rate


0%



%Deferred tax asset


2,536,968



2,354,000Less: Valuation allowance


(2,536,968
)


(2,354,000
)Net deferred tax asset


-



-
 
 As of April 30, 2009, the Company has unused net operating losses for U.S. federal income tax purposes of approximately $7,248,481 that are available to offset future taxable income.  This unused net operating loss carry forward balance for income tax purposes will expire in the years 2024 through 2029.
 
 The reconciliation of income tax attributable to continuing operations computed at the statutory tax rates to income tax expense is:




IAS Energy, Inc.
 (A Development Stage Company)
 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements





April 30,


April 30,2008


2008$


$Income tax benefit computed at U.S. statutory rates


230,689



330,873Write-off of accounts payable


-



–Depletion


(900
)


(515
)Impairment loss – oil and gas properties


(14,025
)


(124,011
)Equity adjustment


-



(12,762
)Stock-based adjustment


(47,471
)


(31,735
)Gain on sale of available-for-sale securities


-



672Gain on issue of shares


(1,750)



18,813Unrecognized tax losses


(166,543
)


(181,335
)Future income tax benefit


–



–
 
 Note 13.                      Commitments
 (i)
By sublicense agreements dated July 10, 1995, the Company was granted an exclusive worldwide sublicense by Integral Concepts Inc. (“ICI”) and West Virginia University Research Corporation (“WVURC”) to the Contrawound Toroidal Helical Antenna (“CTHA”) technology, excluding all military and governmental applications and resulting procurement
interests. On March 17, 2005, the Company entered into settlement and release agreements with each of ICI and WVURC to terminate the July 10, 1995 agreements. Accordingly, the Company was released from all previously accrued royalty fees.

On March 17, 2005, the Company entered into a non-exclusive license agreement with WVURC for the development, manufacture, use and sale of the CTHA technology. The agreement was retroactively effective on January 15, 2005. The terms of the non-exclusive sublicense agreement are as follows:
  (i)
The Company will pay a license fee of $3,000 for each calendar year, payable on or before January 15 of each year (paid).
  (ii)
The Company will pay a royalty 10% of net sales.
  (iii)
The Company will pay a royalty of 50% of all other sublicense revenues.
  All royalties in items (ii) and (iii) are payable within 30 days of each calendar quarter. The terms of the agreement remain in effect until the expiration of the last patent to expire that is included in the CTHA technology.
 
 (ii)
On August 31, 2007, the Company entered into an agreement with America West Pacific International Invest Corporation (“America West”) to provide public and investor relations for a period of eighteen months. America West was issued 100,000 common shares of the Company and 100,000 share purchase warrants to acquire 100,000 common shares at $0.40 per share for a period of two years, expiring on August 31,
2009. America West will also receive 15% of any funds they raise for the Company, which will be paid 10% in cash and 5% in common shares. The fair value of the 100,000 common shares and warrants issued was $50,681, which has been charged to professional fees.




(iii)
On September 9, 2009, the Company’s 60% owned subsidiary, Power Telecom, who is the owner of website “Video 1314”, entered into an advertising agreement with Panpacific Business Ltd. The agreement states that Panpacific Business Ltd. will be the exclusive advertiser for the Video 1314 website for a period of 2 years. Power Telecom will offer 40% of its advertising revenue to Panpacific Business
Ltd.











IAS Energy, Inc.
 (A Development Stage Company)
 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
 
  Note 14. Subsequent events
  The following events occurred subsequent to April 30, 2009:
  a.)
The Company entered a consulting agreement with 1800blogger.com on July 16, 2009 for consulting services to provide the Company daily exposure on Penny Stock Blog.
 
 b.)
On July 31, 2009, the Company issued the remaining 224,745 shares to JGR to as the final payment for the working interest in two oil wells located in Burleson County, Texas in 2005. Refer to Note 11(a).
 
 c.)
On July 24, 2009, Ms. Jennifer Lorette, Secretary/a member of the Board of Directors, has resigned from the Company.
 
 d.)
100,000 purchase warrants issued during a private placement on September 5, 2008 that enables the holder to purchase one additional share at an exercise price of $0.25 for one year, expired on September 5, 2009.
 
 e.)
100,000 purchase warrants issued during a private placement on May 28, 2008 that enables the holder to purchase one additional share at an exercise price of $0.50 for one year, expired on May 28, 2009.
 
 f.)
100,000 purchase warrants issued during a private placement on August 31, 2008 that enables the holder to purchase one additional share at an exercise price of $0.40 for one year, expired on August 31, 2009.
 
 g.)
On September 9, 2009, the Company’s 60% owned subsidiary, Power Telecom, who is the owner of website “Video 1314”, entered into an advertising agreement with Panpacific Business Ltd. The agreement states that Panpacific Business Ltd. will be the exclusive advertiser for the Video 1314 website for a period of 2 years. Power Telecom will
offer 40% of its advertising revenue to Panpacific Business Ltd.
 
 h.)
As of July 16, 2009, 150,000 shares of common stock options from the 2007 Stock Option Plan had been exercised a consultant to the Company at an exercise price of $0.05 per share.