alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 184
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 184 appear at 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; and 81 FR 49897, July 29, 2016.

§ 184.1077 Potassium acid tartrate. ( a ) Potassium acid tartrate (C4H5KO6, CAS Reg. No. 868-14-4) is the potassium acid salt of l−(+)−tartaric acid and is also called potassium bitartrate or cream of tartar. It occurs as colorless or slightly opaque crystals or as a white, crystalline powder. It has a pleasant, acid taste. It is obtained as a byproduct of wine manufacture.
( b ) The ingredient meets the specifications of the Food Chemicals Codex, 3d Ed. (1981), P. 238, which is incorporated by reference. Copies are available from the National Academy Press, 2101 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20418, or available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .*
( c ) In accordance with § 184.1(b)(1), the ingredient is used in food with no limitation other than current good manufacturing practice. The affirmation of this ingredient as generally recognized as safe (GRAS) as a direct human food ingredient is based upon the following current good manufacturing practice conditions of use: ( 1 ) The ingredient is used as an anticaking agent as defined in § 170.3(o)(1) of this chapter; an antimicrobial agent as defined in § 170.3(o)(2) of this chapter; a formulation aid as defined in § 170.3(o)(14) of this chapter; a humectant as defined in § 170.3(o)(16) of this chapter; a leavening agent as defined in § 170.3(o)(17) of this chapter; A pH control agent as defined in § 170.3(o)(23) of this chapter; a processing aid as defined in § 170.3(o)(24) of this chapter; a stabilizer and thickener as defined in § 170.3(o)(28) of this chapter; and a surface-active agent as defined in § 170.3(o)(29) of this chapter.
( 2 ) The ingredient is used in the following foods at levels not to exceed current good manufacturing practice: baked goods as defined in § 170.3(n)(1) of this chapter; confections and frostings as defined in § 170.3(n)(9) of this chapter; gelatins and puddings as defined in § 170.3(n)(22) of this chapter; hard candy as defined in § 170.3(n)(25) of this chapter; jams and jellies as defined in § 170.3(n)(28) of this chapter; and soft candy as defined in § 170.3(n)(38) of this chapter.
( d ) Prior sanctions for this ingredient different from the uses established in this section do not exist or have been waived.
[48 FR 52446, Nov. 18, 1983]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Investigation No. AA1921-167 (Third Review)]

# AGENCY:

United States International Trade Commission.

# ACTION:

Revised schedule for the subject review.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         February 16, 2010.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Edward Petronzio (202-205-3176), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (                        *http://www.usitc.gov*). The public record for these reviews may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at                         *http://edis.usitc.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

On August 20, 2009, the Commission established a schedule for the conduct of the review (74 FR 43155, August 26, 2009). Due to the closure of the Federal Government for four days as a result of inclement weather and related disruptions, the Commission is issuing a revised schedule.

The Commission's new schedule for the review is as follows: the closing of the record and final release of data to parties will be February 18, 2010, and final comments of parties will be due on February 22, 2010.

For further information concerning the review see the Commission's notice cited above and the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A and C (19 CFR part 207).

Authority:  The review is being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.21 of the Commission's rules.

By order of the Commission.

 Issued: February 16, 2010.

Marilyn R. Abbott,

Secretary to the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2010-3423 Filed 2-22-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
Order entered April 21 , 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 19 - 01165 - CR No. 05 - 19 - 01166 - CR No. 05 - 19 - 01167 - CR No. 05 - 19 - 01168 - CR DAVID JASON GARCIA, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F - 1739675 - H , F - 1739376 - H , F - 1839433 - H , F - 1900494 - H ORDER The State’s motion for extension of time to file brief is GRANTED . The S tate’s brief is deemed FILED on April 17, 2020.

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES PRESIDING JUSTICE
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 903 

Repealing rule XXVII of the Rules of the House of Representatives relating 

to the statutory limit on the public debt. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 29, 2006 

Mr. CHOCOLA (for himself, Mr. CUELLAR, Mr. AKIN, Mr. BARRETT of South 

Carolina, Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. CARTER, 

Mr. CASE, Mr. CHABOT, Mr. CHANDLER, Mr. CONAWAY, Mr. COOPER, 

Mr. CULBERSON, Mr. DAVIS of Tennessee, Ms. FOXX, Mr. GARRETT of 

New Jersey, Mr. GINGREY, Mr. GOODE, Mr. GUTKNECHT, Ms. HART, 

Mr. HAYWORTH, Mr. HEFLEY, Mr. HENSARLING, Mr. HERGER, Mr. 

JONES of North Carolina, Mr. KLINE, Mr. KUHL of New York, Mrs. 

MUSGRAVE, Mrs. MYRICK, Mr. NORWOOD, Mr. PENCE, Mr. SCOTT of 

Georgia, Mr. SHADEGG, Mr. TANCREDO, Mr. WAMP, and Mr. WESTMORELAND) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Repealing rule XXVII of the Rules of the House of Representatives relating to the statutory limit on the public 

debt. 

1 Resolved, That rule XXVII of the Rules of the House 

2 of Representatives (relating to the statutory limit on the 

3 public debt) is repealed and rule XXVIII is redesignated 

4 as rule XXVII. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
§ 784.3 Policy. ( a ) Section 6 of Public Law 96-517 (the Bayh-Dole patent and trademark amendments of 1980), as amended, as codified at 35 U.S.C. 200—212, provides that title to inventions conceived or first actually reduced to practice in the course of or under any contract, grant, agreement, understanding, or other arrangement entered into with or for the benefit of the Department of Energy (DOE) vests in the United States, except where 35 U.S.C. 202 provides otherwise for nonprofit organizations or small business firms. However, where title to such inventions vests in the United States, the Secretary of Energy (hereinafter Secretary) or designee may waive all or any part of the rights of the United States, subject to required terms and conditions, with respect to any invention or class of inventions made or which may be made by any person or class of persons in the course of or under any contract of DOE if it is determined that the interests of the United States and the general public will best be served by such waiver. In making such determinations, the Secretary or designee shall have the following objectives: ( 1 ) Making the benefits of the energy research, development, and demonstration program widely available to the public in the shortest practicable time;
( 2 ) Promoting the commercial utilization of such inventions;
( 3 ) Encouraging participation by private persons in DOE's energy research, development, and demonstration programs; and
( 4 ) Fostering competition and preventing undue market concentration or the creation or maintenance of other situations inconsistent with the antitrust laws.
( b ) If it is not possible to attain the objectives in paragraphs (a)(1) through (4) immediately and simultaneously for any specific waiver determination, the Secretary or designee will seek to reconcile these objectives in light of the overall purposes of the DOE patent waiver policy, as set forth in section 152 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, 42 U.S.C. 2182, section 9 of the Federal Nonnuclear Energy Research and Development Act of 1974, 42 U.S.C. 5908, Public Law 99-661, 42 U.S.C. 7261a, and, where not inconsistent therewith, the Presidential Memorandum to the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies on Government Patent Policy issued February 18, 1983 and Executive Order No. 12591 issued April 10, 1987.
( c ) The policy set forth in this section is applicable to all types of contracts as defined in § 784.2 of this part.
[No. 38758-8-I.

Division One.

November 24, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. J.D.G., *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 94-8-06095-5, Michael Spearman, J., entered May 21, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Kennedy, A.C.J., concurred in by Agid and Cox, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 3 (Wednesday, January 5, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 572-573]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-33323]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human 
Development; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be open to the public, with attendance limited to 
space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special 
assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, should notify the contact person listed below in 
advance of the meeting.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: January 19, 2011.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To provide concept review of proposed concept review.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 
Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Sathasiva B. Kandasamy, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National

[[Page 573]]

Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 6100 Executive 
Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20892-9304, (301) 435-6680, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fc8f979d92989d8f9dbc919d9590d2929594d29b938a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0e7d656f606a6f7d6f4e636f67622060676620696178">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 29, 2010.
Anna P. Snouffer,
Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-33323 Filed 1-4-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SEALED JUVENILE 1, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-30375.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Oct. 21, 2005.

Before SMITH, GARZA and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Before the court is an interlocutory appeal of an order by the district court transferring appellant, a juvenile male, for prosecution as an adult under 18 U.S.C. § 5032. Appellant argues that the district court abused its discretion in granting the Government’s motion to transfer proceedings against the juvenile to an adult criminal prosecution. We have reviewed the record and briefs of counsel and find no abuse of discretion. *United States v. Juvenile No. 1,*118 F.3d 298, 307 (5th Cir.1997). Accordingly, we AFFIRM the district court’s order of transfer.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
NUCLEAR MODERNIZATION 

Role of Nuclear Weapons

Longstanding, Bipartisan Continuity in U.S. Nuclear Policy

The findings and recommendations of the 2018 Nuclear Posture Review (NPR) maintains the United States’

traditional, bipartisan approach to nuclear policy: ensure a safe, secure, and effective nuclear deterrent while 

simultaneously pursuing nuclear nonproliferation and arms control efforts to advance security for the United States 

and its allies and partners.

Every NPR has emphasized that changes in the international security environment must shape U.S. nuclear policy, 

strategy, and posture. Despite the rapid deterioration of this environment since the 2010 NPR, the 2018 NPR does 

not increase the range of circumstances under which the U.S. would contemplate the use of nuclear weapons and 

does not increase our reliance on nuclear weapons. 

Nuclear Weapons Roles

U.S. nuclear forces have complementary and interrelated roles 

within our national security strategy. The adequacy of these 

forces must be assessed against each role. As identified in the 

2018 NPR, these roles are:

♦ Deterrence of nuclear and non-nuclear attack

♦ Assurance of allies and partners

♦ Achievement of U.S. objectives if deterrence fails

♦ Capacity to hedge against an uncertain future

U.S. Declaratory Policy

Consistent with the 2010 NPR, U.S. nuclear declaratory policy remains that “the United States would only consider 

the employment of nuclear weapons in extreme circumstances to defend the vital interests of the United States, its 

allies, and partners.” To reduce the potential for adversary miscalculation in a crisis, the 2018 NPR clarifies that 

such extreme circumstances include, but are not limited to:

♦ Significant non-nuclear strategic attacks on U.S., allied, or partner civilian population or infrastructure

♦ Significant non-nuclear strategic attacks on U.S. or allied nuclear forces, their command and control, or 

warning and attack assessment capabilities

It remains the longstanding policy of the United States to retain some ambiguity regarding the precise 

circumstances that might lead to a U.S. nuclear response. Also consistent with previous policy, the 2018 NPR 

reiterates that, “The United States will not use or threaten to use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear weapons 

states that are party to the NPT [Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons] and in compliance with their 

nuclear non-proliferation obligations.”

“The declaratory policy outlined in the 

2018 NPR is consistent with the 

declaratory policy outlined in the 2010 

NPR. The United States would only 

consider the use of nuclear weapons in 

extreme circumstances to defend the vital 

interests of the United States, its allies 

and partners.”

– Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis
Exhibit 10.36.1


Exhibit 10.36.1




NU LOGO





		
	 	Northest Utilities Service Company


	 	107 Selden Street, Berlin, CT 06037


	 	P. O. Box 270


	 	Hartford, CT 06141-0270


	 	Tel: (860) 665-2440


	 	Fax: (860) 665-2330


	 	 
	 	John Roman


	 	 





March 1, 2006




Andrew Spence

Ameresco, Inc.

111 Speen Street

Suite 410

Frarningham, MA 01701




Re:

Stock Purchase Agreement, dated February 1, 2006, between Select Energy Services, Inc. and Ameresco, Inc. (SPA)




Dear Andrew:




Section 10.01(d)(i) of the SPA provides the right for either party to the agreement to terminate if the Closing has not occurred by March 3, 2006 (30 days). Based upon the current direction of our refinancing efforts, we believe it makes sense for the right to terminate under this section to be extended for an additional 30 days. In other words, neither party would have the right to terminate under Section 10.01(d)(i) of the SPA until 60 days has lapsed from the date of the agreement. If you agree, please have. an appropriate representative from your organization execute the letter. If you have any questions, please don't: hesitate to contact me.





		
	 	Sincerely yours,


	 	 
	 	 
	 	/s/ John Roman


	 	John Roman


	 	Director of Accounting, NUEI







Agreed and accepted by:










/s/ Andrew B. Spence

Name:  Andrew B. Spence

Title:  VP/CFO




cc:

Tim Huckaby, FMI

Peter Brown, NU

Lane Watson, DBH
**Exhibit 10.30****SUMMARY OF OUTSIDE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION**As of June 15, 2006, Directors of IXYS Corporation that are not employees, commonly referred to asoutside directors, received cash compensation on the following basis:     Annual Retainer for each Director $20,000      Additional Annual Retainer for the Chairman of the         Audit Committee $7,500      Compensation Committee $4,000      Nominating Committee $4,000      Director’s Fee for each Board of Directors meeting $1,000      Director’s Fee for each Committee meeting $600 At the September 2005 annual meeting of stockholders, retainer amounts were authorized at 75% ofthe normal amount for one year only, because of a shift forward in time for the annual meeting ofstockholders from November to August or September. The shift was initiated in calendar 2005.
Background• Pacific lamprey in the Columbia River 

Basin have declined to only a remnant of the pre-1940s populations 

• Status of the western brook lamprey is unknown

• Actions are currently being considered for the recovery of Pacific lamprey populations in the Columbia River Basin

Goal• Estimate abundance of adult lamprey 

that use Cedar Creek• Evaluate spawning habitat 

requirements• Determine larval distribution and habitat 

use• Determine outmigrant timing • Evaluate homing fidelity, survival rates, 

and ocean residence (future)

Life Cycle

Habitat Use and Population Dynamics of Lamprey in 

Cedar Creek, WAU. S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Columbia River Fisheries Program Office

Egg

AmmocoeteAdult

Macropthalmia* *Macropthalmia is the outmigrantstage for Pacific lamprey
# EUR-Lex - 31992L0037 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31992L0037

**Commission Directive 92/37/EEC of 30 April 1992 adapting to technical progress for the sixteenth time Council Directive 67/548/EEC on the approximation of the laws, Regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances **

*
Official Journal L 154 , 05/06/1992 P. 0030 - 0031 Finnish special edition: Chapter 15 Volume 11 P. 0046 Swedish special edition: Chapter 15 Volume 11 P. 0046 *

COMMISSION DIRECTIVE 92/37/EEC of 30 April 1992 adapting to technical progress for the sixteenth time Council Directive 67/548/EEC on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 67/548/EEC of 27 June 1967 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances (1), as last amended by Directive 92/32/EEC (2), and in particular Article 19 thereof,

Whereas Annex I to Directive 67/548/CEE contains a list of dangerous substances, together with particulars of the classification and labelling procedures in respect of each substance; whereas examination of the list of the notified dangerous substances in Annex I has shown that this list needs to be adapted in the light of present scientific and technical knowledge; whereas it is necessary to add to this list a number of substances notified to the Commission in accordance with the Directive;

Whereas the provisions of this Directive are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee on the Adaptation to Technical Progress of the Directive for the Elimination of Technical Barriers to Trade in Dangerous Substances and Preparations,

HAS ADOPTED THE DIRECTIVE:

Article 1

Annex I of Directive 67/548/EEC is hereby amended as follows:

1. The entries in Annex I to this Directive replace the corresponding entries in Annex I.

2. The entries in Annex II to this Directive are included for the first time in Annex I.

Article 2

1. Not later than 1 November 1993 the Member States shall implement the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive. Member States shall immediately inform the Commission thereof.

2. When Member States adopt these provisions, these shall contain a reference to this Directive or shall be accompanied by such reference at the time of their official publication. The procedure for such reference shall be adopted by Member States.

Article 3

This Directive is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 April 1992.

For the Commission

Carlo RIPA DI MEANA

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No 196, 16. 8. 1967, p. 1.(2) See page 1 of this Official Journal.

ANNEX I

and ANNEX II

These Annexes will be published in Official Journal of the European Communities No L 154 A

(See the notice published on the inside back cover of this Official Journal.)