alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I,
Daniel W. Dowe, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
(principal executive officer and principal financial officer), of American Home
Food Products, Inc., (the Company), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, certify that: (1)
 In
 connection with the Annual Report of the Company on form 10-KSB for the
 twelve month period ended May 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
 Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), fully complies with
 the requirements of Section 13(a) and Section 15(d) of the Securities and
 Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
 The
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company for
 the periods presented therein.. A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. By:
 /s/ Daniel W.
DoweDaniel W.
DoweChief
Executive Officer andChief
Financial OfficerDate:
 September 7, 2007
Editorial Note on Part 184
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 184 appear at 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; and 81 FR 49897, July 29, 2016.

§ 184.1138 Ammonium chloride. ( a ) Ammonium chloride (NH4Cl, CAS Reg. No. 12125-02-9) is produced by the reaction of sodium chloride and an ammonium salt in solution. The less soluble sodium salt separates out at elevated temperatures, and ammonium chloride is recovered from the filtrate on cooling. Alternatively, hydrogen chloride formed by the burning of hydrogen in chlorine is dissolved in water and then reacted with gaseous ammonia. Ammonium chloride is crystallized from the solution.
( b ) The ingredient meets the specifications of the Food Chemicals Codex, 3d Ed. (1981), p. 20, which is incorporated by reference. Copies are available from the National Academy Press, 2101 Constitution Ave, NW., Washington, DC 20418, or available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .*
( c ) In accordance with § 184.1(b)(1), the ingredient is used in food with no limitation other than current good manufacturing practice. The affirmation of this ingredient as generally recognized as safe (GRAS) as a direct human food ingredient is based upon the following current good manufacturing practice conditions of use: ( 1 ) The ingredient is used as a dough strengthener as defined in § 170.3(o)(6) of this chapter; a flavor enhancer as defined in § 170.3(o)(11) of this chapter; a leavening agent as defined in § 170.3(o)(17) of this chapter; and a processing aid as defined in § 107.3(o)(24) of this chapter.
( 2 ) The ingredient is used in food at levels not to exceed current good manufacturing practice.
( d ) Prior sanctions for this ingredient different from the uses established in this section do not exist or have been waived.
[48 FR 52439, Nov. 18, 1983]
Editorial Note on Part 17
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 17 appear at 68 FR 24879, May 9, 2003, and at 88 FR 45065, July 14, 2023.

§ 17.45 Initial decision. ( a ) The presiding officer shall issue an initial decision based only on the administrative record. The decision shall contain findings of fact, conclusions of law, and the amount of any penalties and assessments imposed.
( b ) The findings of fact shall include a finding on each of the following issues: ( 1 ) Whether the allegations in the complaint are true, and, if so, whether respondent's actions identified in the complaint violated the law;
( 2 ) Whether any affirmative defenses are meritorious; and
( 3 ) If the respondent is liable for penalties or assessments, the appropriate amount of any such penalties or assessments, considering any mitigating or aggravating factors that he or she finds in the case.
( c ) The presiding officer shall serve the initial decision or the decision granting summary decision on all parties within 90 days after the time for submission of posthearing briefs and responsive briefs (if permitted) has expired. If the presiding officer believes that he or she cannot meet the 90-day deadline, he or she shall notify the Commissioner of Food and Drugs or other entity designated by the Commissioner to decide the appeal of the reason(s) therefor, and the Commissioner or that entity may then set a new deadline.
( d ) Unless the initial decision or the decision granting summary decision of the presiding officer is timely appealed, the initial decision or the decision granting summary decision shall constitute the final decision of FDA and shall be final and binding on the parties 30 days after it is issued by the presiding officer.
38569.

#### STEERMAN v. SMITH *et al.*

Decided December 5, 1960.

*810
      *Preston L. Holland,*for plaintiff in error.

*Smith, Kilpatrick, Cody, Rogers & McClatchey, Scott Walters, Jr., Harry J. Mehre, Jr., Wm. W. Cowan,*contra.

Felton, Chief Judge.

*Code*§ 81-1305 provides: “In all suits by or against partners, or where any two or more persons shall sue or be sued in the same action, and the name of any person who ought to be joined in such action as plaintiff or defendant shall be omitted, the omission may, on motion, be supplied by adding the proper party instanter.” This section does not mean that one defendant can make a defendant another party, who is liable over to him. The facts in the case of *Frost v. Smith,*148 Ga. 840 (98 S. E. 471) relied on by the plaintiff, are not comparable to the facts of the present case. In the *Frost*case, Frost was the administrator of the estate of his brother who before his death had been the original defendant. By amendment the administrator was made a party individually. In that case, however, Frost had attempted to set up his individual interest in land which was the subject of the earlier litigation against the estate.

*Code*§ 81-1303 provides: “No amendment adding a new and distinct cause of action or new and distinct parties shall be allowed unless expressly provided for by law.” Directly in point and controlling the instant case is the case of *Hamner v. Johnson,*100 Ga. App. 1 (109 S. E. 2d 881), wherein it was *811stated: “We know of no authority of law and none has been cited by the plaintiff in error, to the effect that in a law case such as this a party defendant could be added on petition of an existing defendant.”

The transfer of the case to this court by the Supreme Court precludes the application of the equity rule as to making parties. Therefore, the court did not err in sustaining the defendant’s motion to set aside the judgment and in overruling the plaintiff’s motion for rehearing.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Nichols and Bell, JJ., concur.*
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

MAYKEL TORRES , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee.

No. 4D 21

- 2076

[ November 24, 2021 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.8 5 0 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Bernard I. Bober

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 14

- 0 09348

- CF

- 10A

.
Maykel Torres, Live Oak , pro se

.
No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

C ONNER , C.J., W ARNER and G ROSS , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6638

JAMES BYRD MILLER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

and

WARREN H. COX,

Plaintiff,

versus

JAMES B. HUNT, Governor; FRANKLIN E. FREEMAN,

JR.; NORTH CAROLINA PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES,

INCORPORATED; MARVIN SPARROW; MARTIN SUPERINTENDENT OF CUSTODY MCDADE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District

Judge. (CA-94-289-5-F)

Submitted: August 22, 1996 Decided: September 10, 1996

Before HALL, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

James Byrd Miller, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Ray Garvey, OFFICE OF

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina,

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42

U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. Appellant's case was referred to a

magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1988). The

magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised

Appellant that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based

upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Appellant failed to

object to the magistrate judge's recommendation.

The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge's

recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the

substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned

that failure to object will waive appellate review. Wright v.

Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985). See generally Thomas

v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Appellant has waived appellate review

by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice.

Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 36 (Wednesday, February 24, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 8362]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3652]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than March 19, 2010.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Todd Offenbacker, Assistant 
Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. Aslin Group, Inc, Mission Hills, Kansas; Aslin Opportunity Fund 
BK, LP, Cape Haze, Florida; and Aslin Capital I, LLC, Cape Haze, 
Florida; all to become bank holding companies through the acquisition 
of 100 percent of the voting shares of 1st Financial Bank, Overland 
Park, Kansas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 19, 
2010.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-3652 Filed 2-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
Editorial Note on Part 184
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 184 appear at 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; and 81 FR 49897, July 29, 2016.

§ 184.1277 Dextrin. ( a ) Dextrin ((C6H10O5)n·H2O, CAS Reg. No. 9004-53-9) is an incompletely hydrolyzed starch. It is prepared by dry heating corn, waxy maize, waxy milo, potato, arrowroot, wheat, rice, tapioca, or sago starches, or by dry heating the starches after: ( 1 ) Treatment with safe and suitable alkalis, acids, or pH control agents and
( 2 ) drying the acid or alkali treated starch.
( b ) The ingredient meets the specification of the Food Chemicals Codex, 3d Ed. (1981), p. 96, which is incorporated by reference. Copies are available from the National Academy Press, 2101 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20418, or available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .*
( c ) In accordance with § 184.1(b)(1), the ingredient is used in food with no limitation other than current good manufacturing practice. The affirmation of this ingredient as generally recognized as safe (GRAS) as a direct human food ingredient is based upon the following current good manufacturing practice conditions of use: ( 1 ) The ingredient is used as a formulation aid as defined in § 170.3(o)(14) of this chapter; as a processing aid as defined in § 170.3(o)(24) of this chapter; as a stabilizer and thickener as defined in § 170.3(o)(28) of this chapter; and as a surface-finishing agent as defined in § 170.3(o)(30) of this chapter.
( 2 ) The ingredient is used in food at levels not to exceed current good manufacturing practice.
( d ) Prior sanctions for this ingredient different from the uses established in this section do not exist or have been waived.
[48 FR 51909, Nov. 15, 1983]
Editorial Note on Part 184
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 184 appear at 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; and 81 FR 49897, July 29, 2016.

§ 184.1742 Sodium carbonate. ( a ) Sodium carbonate (Na2CO3, CAS Reg. No. 497-19-8) is produced ( 1 ) from purified trona ore that has been calcined to soda ash;
( 2 ) from trona ore calcined to impure soda ash and then purified; or
( 3 ) synthesized from limestone by the Solvay process.
( b ) The ingredient meets the specifications of the Food Chemicals Codex, 3d Ed. (1981), p. 280, which is incorporated by reference. Copies are available from the National Academy Press, 2101 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20418, or available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .*
( c ) In accordance with § 184.1(b)(1), the ingredient is used in food with no limitation other than current good manufacturing practice. The affirmation of this ingredient as generally recognized as safe (GRAS) as a direct human food ingredient is based upon the following current good manufacturing practice conditions of use: ( 1 ) The ingredient is used in food as an antioxidant as defined in § 170.3(o)(3) of this chapter; curing and pickling agent as defined in § 170.3(o)(5) of this chapter; flavoring agent and adjuvant as defined in § 170.3(o)(12) of this chapter; pH control agent as defined in § 170.3(o)(23) of this chapter; and processing aid as defined in § 170.3(o)(24) of this chapter.
( 2 ) The ingredient is used in food at levels not to exceed current good manufacturing practice.
( d ) Prior sanctions for this ingredient different from the uses established in this section do not exist or have been waived.
[48 FR 52442, Nov. 18, 1983, as amended at 50 FR 49536, Dec. 3, 1985]
| Name                                      |   | Jurisdiction |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|--------------|
| Level 8 Technologies, Inc.                |   | Delaware     |
|                                      |   |         |
| Cicero Technologies, Inc,                 |   | Delaware     |
|                                      |   |         |
| Cicero Technologies Acquisition, LLC      |   | Delaware     |
|                                      |   |         |
| Template Software de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. |   | Mexico       |
|                                      |   |         |
| Level 8 Systems Australia Pty Ltd         |   | Australia    |
|                                      |   |         |
| Template Software Holding GmbH            |   | Germany      |
| Template SoftwareGeschaftsfuhrungs GmbH   |   | Germany      |
| Template Software GmbH                    |   | Germany      |
|                                      |   |         |
| Level 8 Worldwide Holdings Ltd            |   | Delaware     |
| Seer Technologies de Argentina S.A        |   | Argentina    |
| Level 8 FSC, Inc                          |   | Barbados     |
| Level 8 Benelux B.V                       |   | Netherlands  |
| Seer Technologies do Brasil Ltd.          |   | Brazil       |
| Level 8 Canada, Inc                       |   | Canada       |
| Level 8 Europe (Deutschland) GmbH         |   | Germany      |
| Level 8 Ireland Limited                   |   | Ireland      |
| Level 8 Systems Nordic AB                 |   | Sweden       |
| Seer Korea Co., Limited                   |   | South Korea  |
| Seer Technologies Singapore PTY, Limited  |   | Singapore    |
| Seer Technologies Hong Kong Limited       |   | Hong Kong    |
|                                      |   |         |
| 3020126 Canada, Inc. (fka Bizware)        |   | Canada       |
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7153 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7153

To reauthorize the Dr. Lorna Breen Health Care Provider Protection Act, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 30, 2024

Ms. Wild (for herself, Mrs. Kiggans of Virginia, Mr. Carter of Georgia, 
and Mrs. Dingell) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To reauthorize the Dr. Lorna Breen Health Care Provider Protection Act, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Dr. Lorna Breen Health Care Provider 
Protection Reauthorization Act''.

SEC. 2. EDUCATION AND AWARENESS INITIATIVE ENCOURAGING USE OF MENTAL 
              HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE USE DISORDER SERVICES BY HEALTH CARE 
              PROFESSIONALS.

    Section 3 of the Dr. Lorna Breen Health Care Provider Protection 
Act (Public Law 117-105) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b), by inserting ``and annually 
        thereafter,'' after ``of this Act,''; and
            (2) in subsection (c), by striking ``2022 through 2024'' 
        and inserting ``2025 through 2029''.

SEC. 3. PROGRAMS TO PROMOTE MENTAL HEALTH AMONG THE HEALTH PROFESSIONAL 
              WORKFORCE.

    The second section 764 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 
294t), as added by section 4 of the Dr. Lorna Breen Health Care 
Provider Protection Act (Public Law 117-105), is amended--
            (1) by redesignating such section 764 as section 764A;
            (2) in subsection (a)(3)--
                    (A) by striking ``to eligible entities in'' and 
                inserting ``to eligible entities that--
                    ``(A) are in'';
                    (B) by striking the period and inserting ``; or''; 
                and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(B) have a focus on the reduction of 
                administrative burden on health care workers.'';
            (3) in subsection (c), by inserting ``not less than'' after 
        ``period of''; and
            (4) in subsection (f), by striking ``2022 through 2024'' 
        and inserting ``2025 through 2029''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Southwall Technologies Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending
March 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael E. Seifert, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|/s/MICHAEL E. SEIFERTMichael E. Seifert Chief Financial
OfficerMay 14, 2003 |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---

QuickLinks
05/2G/20 n 13.19 FAX 2024935142 FAA + DMS IgOOI/OOl 

O 

U.S. Department Office of the Chief Counsel aoo Independence Ave,, S.W 

of TianipoTtotton Washington. D.C. 20591 

Federal Aviation 

Adminislialion 

VIA CERTTFIKD MAIL- RETURN RECFJPT REQUESTED and FACSIMILE 

April 29. 2011 

ThQ Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder 

Chief Administrative Law Judge ^.: 

U.S. Department of Transportation •; 

1200 New Jerijcy Avenue, S.H. 

Washington, DC 20590 U 

racsimile: 202-366-7536 ,^.. 

J—" 

Re: DOT Docket No. CPlOSOOOl U FAA Case No. 2009SO950434 -'^ 

Dear Chief Judge Yoder, 

Conriplainant is amending its letter of April 19. 201 \, to acknowledge receipt of M & R 

Helicopters' 2007, 2008, and 2009 PA State Income Tax Returns. The agency is in the 

process of detenuining whether an analysis of the company*s financial state can be 

performed ba.sed on it5 state income tax returns. 

Sincerely, 

/T^ui-a Ponto 

Attorney, Enforcement Division 

Telephone: (202) 267-9863 

Facsimile; (202) 267-5106 

cc: Dr. Michael B. Selig 

President 

M & R Helicopters, LLC 

2045 Westgate Dr. 

Suite 205 

Bethlehem, PA 18017 

Fedeial Aviation Administration ••-•- y • 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. '^f\ 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000 

Washington, D.C. 20591 MAT >" 2011 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC^30 

:n^ M 

BEARING rv DCKET