alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
09-5163-pr Yusov v. Shaughnessy 

### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER
RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL. 

### At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, in the City of New York, on the 22 nd

### day of October, two thousand ten. PRESENT: JON O. NEWMAN, RALPH K. WINTER, GERARD E. LYNCH, Circuit Judges

.

------------------------------------------------------------------ YURI YUSOV, Petitioner-Appellant , v. No. 09-5163-pr JAMES M. SHAUGHNESSY, Supervisory Deportation Officer, et al. , Respondents-Appellees.

----------------------------------------------------------------- --- 

### FOR APPELLANT: YURI YUSOV, pro se , New York, New York. FOR APPELLEE: PATRICIA BUCHANAN, Assistant United States Attorney (Sue Chen, Special Assistant United States Attorney and Benjamin H. Torrance, Assistant United States Attorney, on the brief), for Preet Bharara, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, New York, New York. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Leonard B. Sand, Judge ).UPON DUE CONSIDERATION , it is hereby ORDERED , ADJUDGED , AND DECREED that the district court judgment is AFFIRMED

. Petitioner-Appellant Yuri Yusov, pro se , appeals from the November 20, 2009 judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Sand, J. ) denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and the procedural history of the case. This Court reviews the denial of a § 2241 petition de novo

. See Armstrong v. Guccione , 470 F.3d 89, 96 (2d Cir. 2006). Having re viewed the appellant’s contentions on appeal and the record of proceedings below, we affirm for substantially the same reasons stated by the district court in its thorough opinion. We note, however, that while the appellant’s broad-based attack on the conditions of his release is without merit, our rejection of that attack does not represent an endorsement of the reasonableness of any particular condition. As the government pointed out at oral argument, the appellant remains free to request changes in those conditions from the agency, and to pursue administrative appeals of the denial of any such requests. The dismissal of the present action is without prejudice to any avenue of judicial review that may be available to the appellant to challenge any final decision of the agency rejecting such specific requests. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED

. FOR THE COURT: Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Clerk
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > The Industrial Nurse and the Woman Worker

              																	United States. Women's Bureau					 and 	Mohr, Jennie, 1901-. 						*The Industrial Nurse and the Woman Worker : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 228*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1949,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5501,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research Special Emphasis Panel; Special Emphasis Panel to Review NIDCR EUREKA Applications (RFA-GM-10-009).                    

*Date:*                         March 26, 2010.                    

*Time:*                         1 p.m. to 3 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, One Democracy Plaza, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Rebecca Wagenaar Miller, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Inst of Dental & Craniofacial Research National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy, Rm 666, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-0652,                         *rwagenaa@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.121, Oral Diseases and Disorders Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

      ( print page 8085)    
Dated: February 16, 2010.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-3455 Filed 2-22-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Editorial Note on Part 112
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 112 appear at 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 112.205 Can I appeal or request a hearing on an order to withdraw a qualified exemption applicable to my farm? ( a ) Submission of an appeal, including submission of a request for an informal hearing, will not operate to delay or stay any administrative action, including enforcement action by FDA, unless the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, as a matter of discretion, determines that delay or a stay is in the public interest.
( b ) If the owner, operator, or agent in charge of the farm appeals the order, and FDA confirms the order: ( 1 ) The owner, operator, or agent in charge of the farm must comply with applicable requirements of this part within 120 calendar days from the date of receipt of the order, or, if operations have ceased and will not resume within 120 calendar days, before the beginning of operations in the next growing season, or within a reasonable timeframe, agreed to by FDA, based on a written justification, submitted to FDA, for a timeframe that exceeds 120 calendar days from the date of receipt of the order; and
( 2 ) The owner, operator, or agent in charge of the farm is no longer subject to the modified requirements in §§ 112.6 and 112.7.
###### Editorial Note on Part 172

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 172 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; 70 FR 72074, Dec. 1, 2005; and 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

#### § 172.876 Castor oil.

The food additive castor oil may be safely used in accordance with the following conditions:

(a) The additive meets the specifications of the United States Pharmacopeia XX (1980).

(b) The additive is used or intended for use as follows:

## Use and Limitations

Hard candy production—As a release agent and antisticking agent, not to exceed 500 parts per million in hard candy.

Vitamin and mineral tablets—As a component of protective coatings.

[42 FR 14491, Mar. 15, 1977, as amended at 49 FR 10105, Mar. 19, 1984]
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7103 

AN ACT 

To amend the Small Business Act to require Federal agencies to testify and report on scores received under the 

scorecard program for evaluating Federal agency compliance with small business contracting goals, to testify 

for failure to meet Governmentwide contracting goals, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 7103 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Agency Accountability 

3 Act of 2024’’. 

4 SEC. 2. FEDERAL AGENCY TESTIMONY ON SCORECARD 

5 SCORES AND FAILURE TO ACHIEVE CERTAIN 

6 GOALS. 

7 Section 15(g)(2) of the Small Business Act (15 

8 U.S.C. 644(g)(2)) is amended by adding at the end the 

9 following: 

10 ‘‘(G) TESTIMONY REQUIRED.—The head of the 

11 office established in a Federal agency under sub12 section (k) shall testify before the Committee on 

13 Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate 

14 and the Committee on Small Business of the House 

15 of Representatives under the following cir16 cumstances: 

17 ‘‘(i) If such agency fails to receive a score 

18 equivalent to a letter grade of ‘A’ or above on 

19 the scorecard established under subsection (y) 

20 for a fiscal year, on the reasons for such fail21 ure. 

22 ‘‘(ii) If such agency fails to meet two or 

23 more of the Governmentwide goals established 

24 under paragraph (1)(A), on the reasons for 

25 such failure,’’. 
3 

•HR 7103 EH

1 SEC. 3. FEDERAL AGENCY REPORTING ON SCORECARD 

2 SCORES. 

3 Section 15(h)(1)(D) of the Small Business Act (15 

4 U.S.C. 644(h)(1)(D)) is amended by inserting ‘‘and to im5 prove the score on the scorecard established under sub6 section (y)’’ after ‘‘better meet such goals’’. 

7 SEC. 4. COMPLIANCE WITH CUTGO. 

8 No additional amounts are authorized to be appro9 priated to carry out this Act or the amendments made 

10 by this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 29, 2024. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7103 

AN ACT 

To amend the Small Business Act to require Fedother purposes. meet Governmentwide contracting goals, and for ness contracting goals, to testify for failure to ating Federal agency compliance with small busi- ceived under the scorecard program for evalu- eral agencies to testify and report on scores re-
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 28 , 2018 

# Order

Clerk September 28 , 2018

15 8019 ( 10 8 )

15 8020

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

SC: 158019

v COA: 336898

Wayne CC: 95

- 002388

- FC

CHRISTOPHER WILEY,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

SC: 158020

v COA: 338870

Wayne CC: 92

- 014245

- FC

WILLIAM RUCKER,

Defendant

- Appellee

. _________________________________________/

On order of the C hief Justice , the motion of plaintiff

- appellant to extend the time

for filing its reply is GRANTED. The reply submitted on September 21 , 2018 , is accepted

as timely filed

.
PGI 225.372-1 General.

Information and guidance pertaining to DoD antiterrorism/force protection policy for contracts that

require performance or travel outside the United States can be obtained from the following offices:

(1) For Army contracts: HQDA-AT; telephone, DSN 222-9832 or commercial (703) 692-9832.

(2) For Navy contracts: Naval Criminal Investigative Service (NCIS), Code 21; telephone, DSN

288-9077 or commercial (202) 433-9077.

(3) For Marine Corps contracts: CMC Code POS-10; telephone, DSN 224-4177 or commercial (703)

614-4177.

(4) For Air Force and Combatant Command contracts: The appropriate Antiterrorism/Force

Protection Office at the Command Headquarters. Also see https://atep.dtic.mil.

(5) For defense agency contracts: The appropriate agency security office.

(6) For additional information: Assistant Secretary of Defense for Homeland Defense and Global

Security, ASD (HS/GS); telephone, DSN 227-6566 or 260-8350 or commercial (703) 697-6566 or

(571) 256-8350.

Parent topic: PGI 225.372 Antiterrorism/force protection.
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.3


Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation


Each non-employee member of our Board of Directors currently receives the following cash compensation:


		
	•
	an annual retainer of $15,000 for service on the Board of Directors ($30,000 for service as non-executive Chairman of the Board of Directors), prorated for any partial year of service;




		
	•
	an annual retainer of $2,500 for service on each committee of the Board of Directors of which he or she is a member ($5,000 for service as chairman of any such committee), prorated for any partial year of service;




		
	•
	a fee of $2,500 for each meeting of the Board of Directors that he or she attends in person ($500 for each telephonic meeting of the Board of Directors in which he or she participates); and




		
	•
	a fee of $1,000 for each committee meeting that he or she attends in person other than in connection with a meeting of the full Board of Directors ($500 for each telephonic committee meeting in which he or she participates).




All non-employee directors are reimbursed for expenses in connection with attendance at Board of Directors and committee meetings.


Non-employee directors may also be granted stock options, restricted stock awards or restricted stock unit awards under our 2017 Non-Employee Directors’ Equity Incentive Plan.  Our Board of Directors determines the provision of each award granted under the plan, including the type of award, the number of shares subject to such award and any relevant vesting schedule.  All stock options granted under the plan have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant.  Non-employee directors may not be granted awards under the plan with an aggregate grant date fair value of more than $500,000 during any calendar year, taken together with any cash fees paid to such non-employee director in compensation for service on our Board of Directors during such calendar year.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7170 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7170

To amend section 3663A of title 18, United States Code, to clarify that 
 restitution includes necessary and reasonable expenses incurred by a 
              person who has assumed the victim's rights.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 31, 2024

 Ms. Hageman (for herself, Mrs. McBath, Mr. Moran, and Mr. Johnson of 
   Georgia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend section 3663A of title 18, United States Code, to clarify that 
 restitution includes necessary and reasonable expenses incurred by a 
              person who has assumed the victim's rights.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Victims' Voices Outside and Inside 
the Courtroom Effectiveness Act'' or the ``Victims' VOICES Act''.

SEC. 2. RESTITUTION FOR EXPENSES OF PERSONS WHO HAVE ASSUMED THE 
              VICTIM'S RIGHTS.

    Section 3663A(a) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
    ``(4) Clarification.--In ordering restitution under this section, a 
court shall order the defendant to make restitution to a person who has 
assumed the victim's rights under paragraph (2) to reimburse that 
person's necessary and reasonable--
            ``(A) lost income, child care, transportation, and other 
        expenses incurred during and directly related to participation 
        in the investigation or prosecution of the offense or 
        attendance at proceedings related to the offense;
            ``(B) lost income, transportation, and other expenses 
        incurred that are directly related to transporting the victim 
        for necessary medical and related professional services and 
        devices relating to physical, psychiatric, and psychological 
        care, including nonmedical care and treatment rendered in 
        accordance with a method of healing recognized by the law of 
        the place of treatment; and
            ``(C) lost income, transportation, and other expenses 
        incurred that are directly related to transporting the victim 
        to receive necessary physical and occupational therapy and 
        rehabilitation.''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[House Prints 108-C]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

108th Congress            COMMITTEE PRINT NO. 108-C      
2d Session

_____________________________________________________________________
 
                  COMPILATION OF SELECTED ACTS

                CONCERNING NATIONAL PARKS, PUBLIC

                   LANDS, AND RELATED MATTERS

          (As Amended Through the End of the First Session of

             the 108th Congress, December 31, 2003)

                              __________

                      PREPARED FOR THE USE OF THE

                        COMMITTEE ON RESOURCES

                                 OF THE

                      ONE HUNDRED EIGHTH CONGRESS

                              SECOND SESSION

                                 JULY 2004

                        Printed for the use of the
                      
                       House Committee on Resources

                        U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

91-874                          WASHINGTON : 2004
_____________________________________________________________________
For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing
Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov  Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800
Fax: (202) 512-2250  Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC  20402-0001

[TEXT NOT AVAILABLE]                 
```
Exhibit 32(d)


                 Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                    as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection  with the Annual  Report of Pro Tech  Communications,  Inc.  ("Pro
Tech") on Form 10-K for the period  ending  December  31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  we,
Richard  Hennessey,  President and Debra Kirven,  Chief Financial Officer of Pro
Tech,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of Pro Tech.


/s/  RICHARD HENNESSEY
-----------------------
Richard Hennessey
President
March 30, 2004


/s/  DEBRA KIRVEN
-----------------------
Debra Kirven
Chief Financial Officer
March 30, 2004
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 22 - 50374 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff
— Appellee **,** versus **Nicasio Nevarez -**  **Zamudio,** Defendant
— Appellant **.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 4:21 - CR - 1067 - 1

**______________________________** Before **King, Higginson,** and **Willett,** Circuit Judges **. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** Nicasio Nevarez - Zamudio appeals his conviction and sentence for illegal reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2), contending that the enhancement of his sentence under § 1326(b) is unconstitutional. He has filed an unopposed motion for summary disposition and a let ter brief explaining that he raises this issue only to preserve it for further review , correctly conceding it to be foreclosed by Almendarez - Torres v. United States ,

**_____________________** * This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir . R.**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 24, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-50374 Document: 00516655215 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/24/2023No. 22 - 50374

2 523 U.S. 224 (1998). See United States v. Pervis , 937 F.3d 546, 553 – 54 (5th Cir. 2019). Because summary disposition is appropriate, see Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis , 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969), Nevarez - Zamudio ’s motion is **GRANTED** , and the judgment of the district court is **AFFIRMED** . Case: 22-50374 Document: 00516655215 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/24/2023
p.1 

OAR Box 1384 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

72) ll-E-32 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:05 AM Sheet 72 of 264 
P.2 

OCT 24 '95 09:24PM EPA DURHAM P. 2/6 

CONTACT REPORT 

From; Wanita Dunston, US Environmental Protection Agency 

Date of Contact! October 10,1995 

Contacts: Paul Young, Jr. 

Company/Agency; Leer East, Inc. 

Telephone Number: (717) 742-2647 

CONTACT Sl 

(Notes prepared by Wanita Dunston) 

• Leer East, Inc. was contacted to clarify the response to the screening survey with regard 

to the facility's potential use of carbon filters to reduce styrene emissions. Paul Young, Jr 

confirmed that carbon filters were not used at Leer East, Inc. to reduce emissions. 

Information b accurate: 

[jM-UxJdrti £j~r1~. 

Post-lf brand tax transmittal memo7671 [««tPaa»«» [_ 

Dept. 

""EflQ^^OlS&L 

Phont 

Fax 

t^Posk 

hno^-aipP 

^rv-vfo-qasol