alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 172

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 172 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; 70 FR 72074, Dec. 1, 2005; and 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

#### § 172.160 Potassium nitrate.

The food additive potassium nitrate may be safely used as a curing agent in the processing of cod roe, in an amount not to exceed 200 parts per million of the finished roe.
2008-0035.

#### State v. Frye.

Ashtabula App. No. 2007-A-0023, 2007-Ohio-6941. On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied.

Moyer, C.J., and O’Connor, J., dissent.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference in this registration statement of our report dated March 12, 1999
(except for Note 10, as to which the date is May 5, 1999) included in Getty
Images, Inc.'s Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 1999 and to all
references to our Firm included in this registration statement.

Arthur Andersen LLP

ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Chicago, Illinois
October 28, 1999
(logo)KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

           Suite 1900
           1021 East Cary Street
           Richmond, VA 23219-4023


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT



The Board of Directors and Shareholder
Meritech Mortgage Services, Inc.:



We have examined management's assertion about Meritech Mortgage Services, Inc.'s
(the "Company")  compliance with the minimum servicing  standards  identified in
the Mortgage  Bankers  Association  of  American's  UNIFORM  SINGLE  ATTESTATION
PROGRAM  FOR  MORTGAGE  BANKERS as of and for the year ended  December  31, 1995
included in the accompanying management assertion. Management is responsible for
the  Company's   compliance  with  those  minimum   servicing   standards.   Our
responsibility  is to express an opinion  on  management's  assertion  about the
entity's compliance based on our examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining,  on a test basis,  evidence about the Company's  compliance  with the
minimum  servicing  standards  and  performing  such  other   procedures  as  we
considered  necessary  in the  circumstances.  We believe  that our  examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a
legal  determination   on the Company's  compliance  with the minimum  servicing
standards.

In our  opinion,  management's  assertion  that the  Company  complied  with the
aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended December
31, 1995 is fairly stated, in  all material respects.


                                                       /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP



February 6, 1996



(logo) Member Firm of 
Klynveld Peat Marwick Goerdeler
§ 1500.15 Submission of Dispute. An Affected Entity or its authorized representative may dispute an Agency Decision by electronically submitting a Dispute to the DDO identified in the Agency Decision. In order for the DDO to consider the Dispute, it must satisfy the following requirements: ( a ) *Timeliness.* The DDO must receive the Dispute no later than 30 calendar days from the date the Agency Decision is electronically sent to the Affected Entity. The DDO will dismiss any Dispute received after the 30-day period unless the DDO grants an extension of time to submit the Dispute. The Affected Entity must submit a written request for extension to the DDO before the expiration of the 30-day period. The DDO may grant a one-time extension of up to 30 calendar days when justified by the situation, which may include the unusual complexity of the Dispute or because of exigent circumstances.
( b ) *Method of submission.* The Affected Entity must submit the Dispute electronically via email to the DDO, with a copy to the AO, using the email addresses specified in the Agency Decision within the 30-day period stated in paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) *Contents of Dispute.* The Dispute submitted to the DDO must include: ( 1 ) A copy of the disputed Agency Decision;
( 2 ) A detailed statement of the specific legal and factual grounds for the Dispute, including copies of any supporting documents;
( 3 ) The specific remedy or relief the Affected Entity seeks under the Dispute; and
( 4 ) The name and contact information, including email address, of the Affected Entity's designated point of contact for the Dispute.
[85 FR 61575, Sept. 30, 2020]
Explosives Detection Canines 

Active Shooter Response Research & 

Development 

PROTECTING THE HOMELAND

The Department of Homeland Security Science (DHS) 

and Technology Directorate’s (S&T) Detection Canine 

Program has extensive and ongoing interaction with first 

responders through the program’s Regional Explosives 

Detection Dog Initiative (REDDI) events and other 

outreach. In response to first responder requests, S&T’s 

Detection Canine Program is conducting a pilot 

demonstration integrating explosive detection canine 

teams with responder police, fire, and EMS personnel to 

explore the potential of developing a more effective 

response to active shooter incidents. 

OUR MISSION IS YOUR SAFETY 

The mission of the Detection Canine Program is to 

provide the tools, techniques and knowledge to better 

understand, train and use detection canine teams, 

including those specially trained to counter explosive 

threats. Our customers are the federal, state and local 

law enforcement end-users of detection canine teams 

throughout the Homeland Security Enterprise. 

The Detection Canine Program is taking a pioneering 

approach to incorporate the use of explosive detection 

canine teams into the initial tactical response to active 

shooter incidents to clear an area of potential explosive 

threats. Using canine teams in conjunction with law 

enforcement response will also help facilitate a secure 

zone for responding fire/EMS assets to rapidly attend to 

injured victims and affected infrastructure. 

The program’s partnerships with Battelle Memorial 

Institute and the Counterterrorism Advanced Training 

Center (CTATC) in Immokalee, Florida, provides law 

enforcement agencies with access to subject matter 

expertise and a venue uniquely suited to a variety of realworld, operational scenarios. 

In these events, first responder participants from the law 

enforcement, fire, and EMS communities will conduct a 

roundtable exercise discussing each participant’s role in 

an operationally relevant active shooter exercise, and 

how detection canine teams can enable a safer and more 

effective response. Scenarios will include mock 

encounters with "assailants" as well as "victims" in need 

of immediate first aid. 

Law enforcement personnel participating in an active 

shooter training drill at the Counterterrorism Advanced 

Training Center in Immokalee, Florida 

“The explosives detection canine is one of the best, most 

versatile mobile detection tools available for protecting 

the Homeland from the explosive threat,” says Don 

Roberts, S&T Detection Canine Program Manager. “We 

are very interested to explore how this detection platform 

can be best integrated in an active shooter response 

scenario, to help establish the most effective concept of 

operations and deployment schemes for detection 

canines.”

The DHS S&T Detection Canine Program is holding two 

proof-of-principle pilot sessions at CTATC on September 

10-12, 2019 and September 17-19, 2019.

Contact Us: STK9@hq.dhs.gov
### PROPOSALTO PROVIDE ESSENTIALAIR SERVICEAT CAPEYAKATAGA DOCKETDOT-OST-1996-2009-0079 BY: 

### ALSEKAIR SERVICE, INC. YAKUTAT, ALASKA FAA CERTIFICATE#A77AlOlK

Alsek Air Service, Inc is a well-established, multi-pilot 135 operator in business since January 2002. We are AMS point-to-point and AMS special-use certified. Alsek Air Service's chiefpilot Les Hartley has flown in Yakutat since 1995. Les has over 17,000 hours ofyear-round flying experience in the Yakutat geographical area alone. He also has 30 plus years ofaviation maintenance experience and is currently an FAAcertified aircraft maintenance technician and also has an FAA Inspector's Authorization (lA). Alsek Air Service, Inc, based in Yakutat, since being awardedtheEAS contract in 2006, 2008 and 2010 has, and will continue to, fulfill the requirements ofthe Essential Air Service contract OST-1996-2009 by completing three trips per week to Cape Yakataga, May through October which are the six peak months and twice a week over the same route during the six off-peak months ofNovember through April. The residents Cape Yakatagahave benefited from the prompt and courteous service they have received from the local businesses; Alaska Commercial, Mallott's General Store, Delta Western and Yakutat Hardware. Cape Yakataga is part ofthe Yakutat Borough and shouldbe allowed to be provided Essential Air Service from a business that is within the same Borough. Essential Air Service flights will be completed with Alaska-proven Cessna U206G on wheels, insured for 5 passengers or CessnaAl85F, insured for 4 passengers, on wheels; or skis when warranted by seasonal conditions. Both aircraft are dependable as well as rugged. We will charge a seat fare of$120 seat fare per person to Cape Yakataga. Each passenger would be allowed 50#offreight free with additional freight charged at 45 cents per pound. TOTAL ANNUAL SUBSIDY $291,000.00

Estimated time ofdeparture for the EAS flights would·be noon, to coincide with the departure ofAlaska Airlines flight 61.Alsek Air Service, Inc strives to maintain ouruntarnished safetyrecord using onlyhighly experiencedpilots. We have an outstanding record ofreliability in completing the EAS flights which the residents Cape Yakatagaknow they can count on.

Les C Hartley President Alsek Air Service, Inc 907-784-3231 907-784-3256 fax
[No. 15889-6-III.

Division Three.

December 2, 1997.]

#### Truck Insurance Exchange, *Appellant,*v. Sydney L. Hiatt, et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Grant County, No. 95-2-00108-1, Kenneth L. Jorgensen, J., entered May 4, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Kurtz, J., concurred in by Sweeney, C.J., and Kato, J.
SDM S DocI D 46446 8 

## Superfun d Propert y Reus e Evaluatio n Checklis t fo rReportin g th e Sitewid e Read y fo rAnticipate d Us e GPR A Measur e Note : Upo n issuanc e o f th e Guidanc e fo rDocumentin g an d Reportin g Performanc e i n Achievin g Lan d Revitalizatio n (Marc h 1 , 2007) , th e Sitewid e Ready-for-Reus e measur e wa s rename d "Sitewid e Read y fo r Anticipate d Use " (Sitewid e RAU) . 

# SEP A United State s



# ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y Washington , D C 2046 0 

## SUPERFUN D PROPERT Y REUS E EVALUATIO N CHECKLIS T FO RREPORTIN G TH E

SITEWID E READ Y FO RANTICIPATE D US E GPR A MEASUR E Offic e of Superfun d Remediatio n & Technolog y Innovatio n an d Federa l Facilitie s Restoratio n & Reus e Offic e PAR T A^^GENERAL^T^IN ^ ]2\ Z ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ -^ ^ ^ ^ _ ^ . ^ „ 1 . Sit e Nam e O'CONNO RCO . 3 . Site I D 010103 1 2 . EPAI D MED98073147 5 4 . RP M Terr y Connell y 5 . Stree t Addres s EASTER N AVE , RT I 7 6 . Cit y AUGUST A 7 . State M E 8 . Zi p Cod e 0433 0 9 . Site Wide Read

y fo r Anticipate d Us e Determinatio n Requirement s (al l mus t b e met fo r th e entire constructio n complete site ) [V i All cleanup goal s i

n th e Recofd(s ) o f

Decisio n o

r other remedy decisio n document(s ) hav e been achieve d fo r any medi atha

t ma y affect current an d reasonabl y anticipate d futur e lan d uses , s o tha

t there ar e n o anacceptabl e risks . All institutional o

r other control s require d i

n th e Record(s ) of

Decisio n o r

other remed y decisio n document(s ) hav e been pu t i n place . PAR T B7-^SIGNATURE^(Branc h Chii f o r abov e shoul d gign ) '^^ '"'J J J "_ ^ ^ NOTE : Th e outcom e o f

thi s Propert

y Reus e Evaluatio n doe s not hav e an y legally bindin g effec

t an ddoe s not

expressl y or

implicitl y create , expand , or limit an y lega l rights , obligations , responsibilities , expectations , or benefit s o f

an y party . EP

A assume s n o responsibilit y fo r reus e activitie s and/o r an y potential har

mtha t migh t result fro mreus e activities . EP

A retain s an

y an dall right s an

dauthoritie s i

t has , includin g bu

t not limite dt o legal , equitable , o r

administrativ e rights . EP

A specificall y retain s an

y an d all right s an

d authoritie s i

t ha s to conduct , direct , oversee , and/o r requir e environmental respons e action s i n connectio n wit

h th e site , includin g bu

t not limite dt o instance s when new or additional informatio n ha s bee n discovere d regardin g th e contaminatio n or condition s a

t th e sit e tha t indicate s tha

t th e respons e and/o r

th e condition s a

t th e sit e ar e n o longe r protectiv e o f

huma n healt h or th e environment . 10 . Name 12 . Signature 11 . Title/Organizatio n 

## 13 . Dater y EP A For m9100- 4 (9-2004 ) S'tfrrrfc'n d Record s Cente r

'Z\'Z . O-

C r^i^^'^'< ' C O
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           7,238
<SECURITIES>                                     7,085
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,198
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                         57
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,147
<PP&E>                                           5,547
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,526
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  22,913
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,388
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            60
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,892
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    22,913
<SALES>                                          1,783
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,579
<CGS>                                              342
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      959
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,303
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    509
<INCOME-TAX>                                       183
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                326
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       326
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BODDIE-NOELL
PROPERTIES, INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE
30, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997 
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997 
<CASH>                                       1,211,595
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,455
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,773,503
<PP&E>                                     110,161,723
<DEPRECIATION>                             (12,739,629)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             103,793,752
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,079,826
<BONDS>                                     77,952,840
<COMMON>                                    35,048,271
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (10,717,654)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               103,793,752
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,718,954
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,923,905
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               837,031
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,104,430
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                853,588
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            853,588
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   853,588
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.28
        


</TABLE>
## COURT OF APPEALS SECO ND DISTRICT OF T EXAS FORT WORTH N O
. 2
- 0 9
- 3 6 6
- C V M I C H A E L H I N Z M A N N , M
. D
. A P P E L L A N T S A N D C O N S U L T A N T S I N R A D I O L O G Y V
. J A M E S B O W E R S A P P E L L E E

- - - - - - - - - - F R O M T H E 1 5 3 R D D I S T R I C T C O U R T O F T A R R A N T C O U N T Y

- - - - - - - - - - 

### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 1 

### A N D J U D G M E N T

- - - - - - - - - - W e h a v e c o n s i d e r e d a p p e l l a n t s ’ “ U n o p p o s e d M o t i o n T o D i s m i s s A p p e a l W i t h P r e

j u d i c e . ” I t i s t h e c o u r t ’ s o p i n i o n t h a t t h e m o t i o n s h o u l d b e g r a n t e d ; t h e r e f o r e , w e d i s m i s s t h e a p p e a l
. S e e T e x . R
. A p p . P
. 4 2
. 1 ( a ) ( 1 ) , 4 3
. 2 ( f )
. C o s t s o f t h e a p p e a l s h a l l b e p a i d b y t h e p a r t y i n c u r r i n g t h e s a m e , f o r w h i c h l e t e x e c u t i o n i s s u e . S e e T e x . R
. A p p . P
. 4 3
. 4
.

P E R C U R I A M P A N E L : G A R D N E R , W A L K E R , a n d M C C O Y , J J
. D E L I V E R E D : J a n u a r y 2 1 , 2 0 1 0

1

 S e e T e x . R
. A p p . P
. 4 7
. 4
.
P.1 

OAR Box 1865 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

24) IV-E-12 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 12/3/2008 9:15:27 AM Sheet 24 of 105 
P.2 

A-83-27 

IV-E-12 

CONTACT REPORT 

Date T/W *5,iWl 

CONTACT BY: TELEPHONE x 

______ Originator 

MEETING D Other 

oterr/ 

NAME, TITLE & ORGANIZATION ^ Q l j \fi]H , rr)/v/ c ^ 

ADDRESS & TELEPHONE NUMBER 3 Gtfe^A V #>!>/ • 

7/3-^0-3^ 0 fkiST©*, "H-M S 770<ycJ~03?S 

PURPOSE OR SUBJECT (Give project number if appropriate) 

SUMMARY 

/.o a VA/H/rnvqrD/vj w/KS /W?«L-f 70 c;,vt qewau c iNPia^TioK. 

A £ 0 o - r HD'S . l^ectoCc, T>G£S /vjor oct/v/i f /» faoceji ro 

T)£-Sou-o/L, K ^ J A C 6lt . ^ AV^/C/WSct ^occ'JJc-J - frrZ, H^S 

M ^ A^-c 5//^<cr K

 ; M/^QSPif€r7.,c oa. VACUWVW ,2FJ"/Z>U<J ^ i s . 

£ t Ooirt.es> /1N 3 77^- e 'X A Mode /l^,^ De^irt70/ J ^ <n-K <L/iTA^sr 

TO 0- 3 7o • 

ACTION CD 

Distribution:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000813621
<NAME>                        AMCOL International Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     USD
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.00
<CASH>                                         7,158
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  101,174
<ALLOWANCES>                                   3,721
<INVENTORY>                                    52,180
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               164,833
<PP&E>                                         314,714
<DEPRECIATION>                                 148,450
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 353,859
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          75,909
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       320
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   353,859
<SALES>                                        247,192
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               247,192
<CGS>                                          1960572
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  228,356
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               435
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             4,001
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                14,400
<INCOME-TAX>                                   5,184
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            9,216
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   9,216
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .32
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Amerityre Corporation (the "Company") for the year ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gary N. Benninger, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/Gary N. Benninger
Gary N. Benninger
Chief Executive Officer
September 12, 2007