alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 15
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 15 appear at 88 FR 45065, July 14, 2023.

§ 15.21 Notice of participation; schedule for hearing. ( a ) The notice of hearing will provide persons an opportunity to file a written notice of participation with the Dockets Management Staff within a specified period of time containing the information specified in the notice, e.g., name of participant, address, phone number, affiliation, if any, topic of presentation and approximate amount of time requested for the presentation. If the public interest requires, e.g., a hearing is to be conducted within a short period of time or is to be primarily attended by individuals without an organizational affiliation, the notice may name a specific FDA employee and telephone number to whom an oral notice of participation may be given or provide for submitting notices of participation at the time of the hearing. A written or oral notice of participation must be received by the designated person by the close of business of the day specified in the notice.
( b ) Promptly after expiration of the time for filing a notice, the Commissioner will determine the amount of time allotted to each person and the approximate time that oral presentation is scheduled to begin. If more than one hearing is held on the same subject, a person will ordinarily be allotted time for a presentation at only one hearing.
( c ) Individuals and organizations with common interests are urged to consolidate or coordinate their presentations and to request time for a joint presentation. The Commissioner may require joint presentations by persons with common interests.
( d ) The Commissioner will prepare a hearing schedule showing the persons making oral presentations and the time alloted to each person, which will be filed with the Dockets Management Staff and mailed or telephoned before the hearing to each participant.
( e ) The hearing schedule will state whether participants must be present by a specified time to be sure to be heard in case the absence of participants advances the schedule.
#### § 1114.39 Postmarket changes.

A marketing granted order authorizes the marketing of a new tobacco product in accordance with the terms of the order. Prior to the introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate commerce of a new tobacco product that results from modification(s) to the product, an applicant must submit a new PMTA under § 1114.7 or a supplemental PMTA under § 1114.15 and obtain a marketing granted order for the new tobacco product, unless the new tobacco product can be legally marketed through another premarket pathway.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6031

ABDUL MU’MIN, f/k/a Travis Jackson Marron,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

HAROLD CLARKE, Director of Va. Dept. of Corrections,

 Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:19-cv-00910-TSE-MSN)

Submitted: April 14, 2020 Decided: April 22, 2020

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Abdul Mu’Min, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Abdul Mu’Min seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his unauthorized 

successive 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2018) petition for lack of jurisdiction. We dismiss the appeal 

for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. 

In civil cases, parties have 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final 

judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court 

extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under 

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a 

jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court entered its order on October 28, 2019. Mu’Min filed the notice of 

appeal on December 4, 2019.

*

 Because Mu’Min failed to file a timely notice of appeal or 

obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. 

We deny Mu’Min’s motion for bail or release pending appeal and dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

 * For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of 

appeal is the earliest date Mu’Min could have delivered the notice to prison officials for 

mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988).
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7205 

To authorize additional district judgeships for the districts of Colorado and 

Idaho. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2024 

Mr. NEGUSE (for himself, Mr. SIMPSON, and Mr. FULCHER) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To authorize additional district judgeships for the districts 

of Colorado and Idaho. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rocky Mountain 

5 Judgeship Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGESHIPS FOR THE DIS7 TRICTS OF COLORADO AND IDAHO. 

8 (a) COLORADO.—The President shall appoint, by and 

9 with the advice and consent of the Senate, 2 additional 

10 district judges for the district of Colorado. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 7205 IH

1 (b) IDAHO.—The President shall appoint, by and 

2 with the advice and consent of the Senate, 1 additional 

3 district judges for the district of Idaho. 

4 (c) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

5 The table in section 133(a) of title 28, United States 

6 Code, is amended— 

7 (1) by striking the item relating to Colorado 

8 and inserting the following: 

‘‘Colorado ........................................................................................ 9’’; and 

9 (2) by striking the item relating to Idaho and 

10 inserting the following: 

‘‘Idaho ............................................................................................. 3’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 35 (Tuesday, February 23, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 8052]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3460]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[ Docket No. ER10-426-001]

Stetson Wind II, LLC; Notice of Filing

February 12, 2010.
    Take notice that, on February 5, 2010, Stetson Wind II, LLC filed 
to amend, its filing in the above captioned docket with information 
required under the Commission's regulations. Such filing served to 
reset the filing date in this proceeding.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
[email protected], or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 19, 2010.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-3460 Filed 2-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JASON BRANDON VINSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 249 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 7th day of December, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
###### Editorial Note on Part 172

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 172 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; 70 FR 72074, Dec. 1, 2005; and 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

#### § 172.255 Polyacrylamide.

Polyacrylamide containing not more than 0.2 percent of acrylamide monomer may be safely used as a film former in the imprinting of soft-shell gelatin capsules when the amount used is not in excess of the minimum required to produce the intended effect.
EXHIBIT 32.1

# CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report
of National Medical Health Card Systems, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James Smith, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |  | /s/ James Smith
James SmithChief Executive Officer
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------

November 15, 2004

---

EXHIBIT 32.2

# CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report
of National Medical Health Card Systems, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stuart Fleischer, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

| |  | /s/ Stuart Fleischer
Stuart FleischerChief Financial Officer
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------

November 15, 2004
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7199 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

S74w16860 Janesville Road, in Muskego, Wisconsin, as the ‘‘Colonel 

Hans Christian Heg Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2024 

Mr. FITZGERALD (for himself, Mr. STEIL, Mr. TIFFANY, Mr. GROTHMAN, Mr. 

VAN ORDEN, Mr. GALLAGHER, Ms. MOORE of Wisconsin, and Mr. 

POCAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at S74w16860 Janesville Road, in Muskego, Wisconsin, as the ‘‘Colonel Hans Christian Heg Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. COLONEL HANS CHRISTIAN HEG POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located S74w16860 Janesville Road in 

6 Muskego, Wisconsin, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘Colonel Hans Christian Heg Post Office’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 7199 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Colonel Hans Chris5 tian Heg Post Office’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
## MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 1800Washington Boulevard -Baltimore MD 21230 

# MDE 410-537-3000

- 1-800-633-6101

Martin O'Malley Robert M. Summers, Ph.D. Governor Secretary Anthony G. Brown Lieutenant Governor



### , JUN 

### 2. 22011
Mr. Shawn M. Garvin Regional Administrator (3RAOO) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region III 1650Arch Street Philadelphia PA 19103-2029 Dear Mr. Garvin: The purpose ofthis letter is to submitthe enclosed State Implementation Plan (SIP) Revision # 11-02 concerning implementation ofthe requirements ofthe Environmental Protection Agency'sfinal Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Title V Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule, which was published in the Federal Register on June 3, 2010 (75 FR 31514). This SIP Revision includes amendmentsto (1) Regulation .01 underCOMAR 26.11.01 General Administrative Provisions; (2) Regulations .01 and .12 underCOMAR 26.11.02 Permits, Approvals, and Registration; and (3) Regulation .14 underCOMAR 26.11.06 General Emission Standards, Prohibitions, and Restrictions. Icertify thatthe electronic copy ofthis SIP submittal (enclosed) is an exactduplicate ofthe official hard copy. The Maryland General Assembly's Joint Committee on Administrative, Executive, and Legislative Review (AELR) granted emergency statusto this action which began January 2, 2011. The Notice of Proposed Action forthis SIP Revision was published in the Maryland Register on January 14, 2011. A public hearing was held on February 15, 2011. The action was adopted on April 14, 2011. The Notice of Final Action was published on May 6, 2011 and the amendments became effective on May 16, 2011. All administrative procedureswere properlyfollowed throughoutthe adoption process. Maryland understandsthatthis SIP Revision along with previously approved SIP Revisions relating to itsfederally enforceable PSD program support afinding that Maryland has met its statutory obligations pursuantto CAA 110(a)(2) which relate to CAA Subchapter I, Part C requirements, including, but not limited to, relevant portions of Sections 110(a)(2)(C), (D)(i)(II) and (J). With this action Maryland is also withdrawing the following: (1) SIP Revision #08-07 submitted to EPAon June 30, 2008 which incorporated by reference the federal PSD requirements under40 CFR Part 52.21 (July 1, 2007 Edition); and (2) The specific portion of SIP Revision #09-03 (submitted to EPA on July 31, 2009) that incorporated by reference the federal PSD requirements under40 CFR Part 52.21 (July 1, 2008 Edition).

Recycled Paper www mde slale.md.us TTY Users 1-800-735-2258 Via Maryland Relay ServiceMr. Shawn M. Garvin Page 2 Ifyou have any questions concerning this SIP action, pleasefeel free to call me at (410) 537-3084 or Mr. George (Tad) S. Aburn, Jr., Directorofthe Airand Radiation ManagementAdministration, at (410) 537-3255.

Robert M. Summers, Ph.D. Secretary RMS:dhr Enclosure

Recycled Paper www.mdc.statc.md.u TTY Users 1-800-735-2258 Via Maryland Relay Service
[No. 20414-2-II.

Division Two.

December 5, 1997.]

#### *In the Matter of the Marriage of*Peggy Peters, *Respondent,*and David Peters, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 84-3-04780-1, Vicki L. Hoga,n, J., entered January 5, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Morgan, J., concurred in by Seinfeld and Armstrong, JJ.
§ 1310.16 Exemptions for certain scheduled listed chemical products. ( a ) Upon the application of a manufacturer of a scheduled listed chemical product, the Administrator may by regulation provide that the product is exempt from part 1314 of this chapter if the Administrator determines that the product cannot be used in the illicit manufacture of a controlled substance.
( b ) An application for an exemption under this section must contain all of the following information: ( 1 ) The name and address of the applicant.
( 2 ) The exact trade name of the scheduled listed chemical product for which exemption is sought.
( 3 ) The complete quantitative and qualitative composition of the drug product.
( 4 ) A brief statement of the facts that the applicant believes justify the granting of an exemption under this section.
( 5 ) Certification by the applicant that the product may be lawfully marketed or distributed under the Federal, Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
( 6 ) The identification of any information on the application that is considered by the applicant to be a trade secret or confidential and entitled to protection under U.S. laws restricting the public disclosure of such information by government employees.
( c ) The Administrator may require the applicant to submit additional documents or written statements of fact relevant to the application that he deems necessary for determining if the application should be granted.
( d ) Within a reasonable period of time after the receipt of a completed application for an exemption under this section, the Administrator shall notify the applicant of acceptance or non-acceptance of the application. If the application is not accepted, an explanation will be provided. The Administrator is not required to accept an application if any of the information required in paragraph (b) of this section or requested under paragraph (c) of this section is lacking or not readily understood. The applicant may, however, amend the application to meet the requirements of paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section.
( e ) If the application is accepted for filing, the Administrator shall issue and publish in the Federal Register an order on the application, which shall include a reference to the legal authority under which the order is based. This order shall specify the date on which it shall take effect.
( f ) The Administrator shall permit any interested person to file written comments on or objections to the order. If any comments or objections raise significant issues regarding any findings of fact or conclusions of law upon which the order is based, the Administrator shall immediately suspend the effectiveness of the order until he may reconsider the application in light of the comments and objections filed. Thereafter, the Administrator shall reinstate, revoke, or amend the original order as deemed appropriate.
[71 FR 56024, Sept. 26, 2006]
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 55 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 55

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      January 24, 2017.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 7) to prohibit taxpayer funded abortions. 
All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. The bill shall 
be considered as read. All points of order against provisions in the bill are 
waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and on 
any amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) 
one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the Majority Leader and the 
Minority Leader or their respective designees; and (2) one motion to recommit.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                          5
<CIK>                                              0000812818
<NAME>                                    Hutton Investors Futures Fund, L.P. II

<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                       DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                                     17,397,803
<SECURITIES>                                                  557,447
<RECEIVABLES>                                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           17,955,250
<PP&E>                                                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             17,955,250
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       1,093,764
<BONDS>                                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                                 16,861,486
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               17,955,250
<SALES>                                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           (1,054,712)
<CGS>                                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               16,293
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            (1,071,005)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                               (1,071,005)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                    (310.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       0




</TABLE>
Minntac

 Calculated limit starting with 2010-2012 CEM data

o Deleted data where data substitution was used

o Deleted data w/no flow rate

o Average what data was left

 Line 3 – 71.3 lb SO2/hr (81 % of data used)

 Line 4 – 56.1 lb SO2/hr (85 % of data used)

 Line 5 – 67.9 lb SO2/hr (87 % of data used)

 Line 6 – 64.5 lb SO2/hr (87 % of data used)

 Line 3 – 67.1 lb SO2/hr (88 % of data used)