alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-2067

L. RUTHER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, 

District Judge. (1:16-cv-00996-LMB-MSN)

Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 2, 2017

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

L. Ruther, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

L. Ruther appeals the district court’s order denying his 

motion to stay. The district court denied relief because 

Ruther’s underlying civil action was no longer pending before 

the court and Ruther offered no valid basis for a stay. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we deny Ruther leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss

for the reasons stated by the district court. Ruther v. United 

States, No. 1:16-cv-00996-LMB-MSN (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 19 & 

entered Aug. 22, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
Mr. Michael Cassidy, Staff EHS Specialist 

Environment, Health, Safety 

Kohler Company 

444 Highland Drive, Mail Stop 009 

Kohler, Wisconsin 53044 

Dear Mr. Cassidy: 

 Thank you for reviewing and commenting on the trip reports for the August 5, 2008 and 

August 11, 2008 visits to the Kohler Company facilities in Spartanburg, South Carolina, and 

Kohler, Wisconsin, by representatives from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

and RTI International (RTI). Your comments have been incorporated in the enclosed final trip 

reports. As you did not designate any information in the trip reports as confidential, EPA will 

consider the trip reports to be non-confidential. Also, unless we hear from you by January 21, 

2009 with corrections, EPA will consider the enclosed reports to be final. 

 If you have any questions or additional comments, please contact Mr. Jeff Telander of 

EPA at (919) 541-5427 or Mr. Rick Marinshaw of RTI at (919) 316-3735. Thank you for your 

cooperation. 

Sincerely, 

 Steve Fruh, Group Leader 

 Metals and Minerals Group 

 Sector Policies and Programs Division 

Enclosure
### Origin of mineralized water in Precambrian rocks of the Upper Paraiba Basin, Paraiba, Brazil

By: Stuart L. Schoff

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1663H

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                             757
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     2500
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                       4765
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  8022
<PP&E>                                           21135
<DEPRECIATION>                                   13474
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   41148
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            53340
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          5471
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     65532
<SALES>                                           7378
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  7378
<CGS>                                            14577
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    14577
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 30638
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (37837)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 72 (Friday, April 13, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 22324]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8737]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

Correction--Solicitation for Nominations for Members of the U.S. 
Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)

    The original date of publication for this Federal Register notice 
was March 28, 2012, Volume 77, Number 60, pages 18823-18825. On this 
publication, Gloria Washington's email address is incorrect in two 
places of page 18824 under subheadings ADDRESSES: and FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT:. The correct email address for Gloria Washington 
is: USPSTFmembernominations@AHRQ.HHS.GOV

    Dated: April 4, 2012.
Carolyn M. Clancy,
Director.
[FR Doc. 2012-8737 Filed 4-12-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-90-M
```
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2022-2482 

_____________________________

DARRYL EDWARD MCKNIGHT JR.,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

John F. Simon, Jr., Judge.

November 29, 2023

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, RAY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Lori A. Willner, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Darcy Townsend, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
#### § 200.214 Suspension and debarment.

Non-Federal entities are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, 2 CFR part 180. The regulations in 2 CFR part 180 restrict awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities.
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 79 (Monday, April 26, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 21505-21506]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-9541]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

32 CFR Part 279

[Docket ID: DOD-2009-OS-0141; RIN 0790-AI59]

Retroactive Stop Loss Special Pay Compensation; Correction

AGENCY: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and 
Readiness, DoD.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of the Secretary of Defense published a final rule 
on April 16, 2010 (75 FR 19878), concerning Retroactive Stop Loss 
Special Pay Compensation that was authorized and appropriated in the 
Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009. This document corrects the words 
of issuance that were included in the final rule.

DATES: This rule is effective October 21, 2009, to comply with section 
310 of Public Law 111-32 that calls for the Secretary of Defense to 
issue a rule not later than 120 days from the date of enactment of the 
Act. The change of eligibility for Retroactive Stop Loss

[[Page 21506]]

Special Pay is effective on December 19, 2009, the enactment date of 
the 2010 Department of Defense Appropriations Act.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LTC Brigitte Williams, (703) 614-3973.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Need for Correction

    The words of issuance that were set out within the final rule must 
be corrected to allow for the proper codification of the rule's 
regulatory text.

Correction

    In rule FR Doc. 2010-8739, published on April 16, 2010 (75 FR 
19878) make the following correction. On page 19879, in the first 
column, in the words of issuance, correct the word ``added'' to read 
``revised''.

    Dated: April 20, 2010.
Mitchell S. Bryman,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2010-9541 Filed 4-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
[PORTIONS OF THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN REDACTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION.]

                                  APPENDIX A-7

                                    PRODUCTS

Product Name:     CONDIMENT CADDY, Part # RG-99-2

Product Description: Kitchen Appliance that holds Condiments

Projected Units Sold next 24 months: XXXXXX

Manufacturer:     CirTran-Asia

Sub-Manufacturer: XXXXXX
                                            XXXXXX
                                            XXXXXX

Marketing Partner Contact Info:     EMSON PRODUCTS, INC.

Current Sale Price: $XXXXXX USD - CIRTRAN-ASIA

Current Cost to Manufacturer:       $XXXXXX USD

Total Tooling/Development Costs:    $20,000 USD

Gross Profit Margin Per Unit - $XXXXXX

                         CirTran-Asia $XXXXXX USD
                               XXXXXX $XXXXXX USD

CONDIMENT CADDY Stock Option Schedule

Upon full execution of this Agreement, Cirtran's parent CirTran Corporation will
issue the following options to purchase restricted common stock:

                           Charles Ho                250,000 shares


These initial options will vest and be exercisable only after Cirtran has sold
200,000 CONDIMENT CADDY units. The options will be exercisable at $.06 per share
after vesting. The options will expire and will no longer be exercisable on the
date one year after the date hereof.

In addition, for each whole multiple of 100,000 CONDIMENT CADDY units sold by
Cirtran during the first 24 months of this Agreement in excess of the initial
200,000 units, CirTran Corporation will grant Charles Ho an option to purchase
100,000 shares. Each such additional option will be exercisable for a period of
12 months at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of CirTran
Corporation stock on the date of grant (i.e. the mean between the high bid and
low asked prices for the stock for the date of determination).

As a condition to grant of the options, each option holder will be required to
make standard investment representations to CirTran Corporation.

[XXXXX - REDACTED PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION.]
February 6, 2012

Mr. John Richard Rosenberg

6355 Oxbow Bend

Chanhassen, MN 55317

Dear Mr. Rosenberg:

This is in response to your January 13, 2012 submission (Docket No. FAA-2006-24148) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration for an extension to Exemption No. 8705. That exemption from 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) § 91.109(a) allowed you to conduct flight instruction in Beechcraft Bonanza and Debonair aircraft equipped with a functioning throwover control wheel instead of functioning dual controls.

On August 31, 2011, the FAA amended 14 CFR part 91 related to throwover control wheels (76 FR 54107). A copy of this rule change is enclosed for your information.

Because the relief you seek is now covered under the amended rule, we will take no further action on your petition.

Sincerely,

/s/ Ida Klepper Manager, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 71 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 71

   To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to exempt from 
 regulation as devices non-invasive diagnostic devices, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2023

  Mr. Biggs introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to exempt from 
 regulation as devices non-invasive diagnostic devices, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medical Innovation Acceleration Act 
of 2023''.

SEC. 2. EXEMPTING NON-INVASIVE DIAGNOSTIC DEVICES FROM REGULATION AS 
              DEVICES.

    Section 201(h) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 
U.S.C. 321(h)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``section 520(o)'' and inserting the 
        following: ``section 520(o) or any non-invasive diagnostic 
        device''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following: ``For purposes of 
        the preceding sentence, the term `non-invasive' means, with 
        respect to a diagnostic device, that the device does not 
        penetrate the skin or any other membrane of the body, is not 
        inserted or implanted into the body, causes no more than 
        ephemeral compression or temperature changes to in situ bodily 
        tissues, and does not subject bodily tissues to ionizing 
        radiation.''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 20.1 Testimony by Food and Drug Administration employees. ( a ) No officer or employee of the Food and Drug Administration or of any other office or establishment in the Department of Health and Human Services, except as authorized by the Commissioner of Food and Drugs pursuant to this section or in the discharge of his official duties under the laws administered by the Food and Drug Administration, shall give any testimony before any tribunal pertaining to any function of the Food and Drug Administration or with respect to any information acquired in the discharge of his official duties.
( b ) Whenever a subpoena, in appropriate form, has been lawfully served upon an officer or employee of the Food and Drug Administration commanding the giving of any testimony, such officer or employee shall, unless otherwise authorized by the Commissioner, appear in response thereto and respectfully decline to testify on the grounds that it is prohibited by this section.
( c ) A person who desires testimony from any employee may make written request therefor, verified by oath, directed to the Commissioner setting forth his interest in the matter sought to be disclosed and designating the use to which such testimony will be put in the event of compliance with such request: *Provided,* That a written request therefor made by a health, food, or drug officer, prosecuting attorney, or member of the judiciary of any State, Territory, or political subdivision thereof, acting in his official capacity, need not be verified by oath. If it is determined by the Commissioner, or any other officer or employee of the Food and Drug Administration whom he may designate to act on his behalf for the purpose, that such testimony will be in the public interest and will promote the objectives of the act and the agency, the request may be granted. Where a request for testimony is granted, one or more employees of the Food and Drug Administration may be designated to appear, in response to a subpoena, and testify with respect thereto.
<PAGE>   1
                   [PASTORE COMMUNICATIONS GROUP LETTERHEAD]

                                                                    NEWS RELEASE

                        LEGEND PROPERTIES CLOSES SALE OF
                       LAGUNA SECA RANCH DEVELOPMENT SITE
                               FOR $12.8 MILLION

WOODBRIDGE, Va. Jan. 5 - Legend Properties (formerly NASDAQ:LPROE) has closed
its sale of Laguna Seca Ranch, a proposed residential development site in
Monterey, Calif. for $12.8 million.

Laguna Seca is the second of two assets Legend has recently sold which together
generated proceeds of more than $32 million. On Nov. 18, the company sold the
Lynnwood Center, a retail property in Lynnwood, Wa. for $20.2 million.

The gain from the Laguna Seca sale is expected to be $4 million and the gain
from the Lynwood sale is expected to be approximately $195,000.

President Ed Podboy said, "These sales help to further sharpen our focus on
Legend's core assets on the East Coast, where we are developing large
residential properties in Maryland and Virginia near Washington, D.C. and on
Florida's east coast near Vero Beach. In August, we moved our headquarters from
Seattle, Wash., to metro Washington, D.C., to consolidate our efforts and reduce
operating costs."

Mr. Podboy also said, "We believe that the proceeds from the California and
Washington sales should allow us to fund 1998 operations without raising
additional capital." He said Legend plans to use the sales proceeds as a source
of operating capital and to fund the development and construction of its core
East Coast assets.

Woodbridge, Va-based Legend Properties, Inc. is a real estate development
company with properties in Vero Beach, Fla., and suburban Washington, DC. The
company owns more than 5,800 acres of development properties, with approvals
for more than 10,000 homes and six million square feet of commercial and
industrial property.

NOTE: Certain statements in this news release that are not historical fact
constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of

                                     -more-

<PAGE>   2
Page two
Pastore/Legend Properties
Jan. 5, 1997

1995. Without limiting the foregoing, words such as "believe," "should,"
"expects" and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking
statements.  For a discussion of factors affecting the company's business plan,
see the company's 1996 annual report on Form 10-K - management's discussion and
analysis - "factors affecting Legend's business plan." These statements are
subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ
materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. The company
undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect
future events or circumstances.
Editorial Note on Part 177
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 177 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 70 FR 72074, Dec. 1, 2005; and 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 177.1660 Poly (tetramethylene terephthalate). Poly(tetramethylene terephthalate) (poly (oxytetramethyleneoxyter-ephthaloyl)) [Chemical Abstracts Service Registry No. 24968-12-5] identified in this section may be safely used as articles or components of articles intended to contact food, in accordance with the following prescribed conditions: ( a ) *Identity.* For the purpose of this section, poly (tetramethylene terephthalate) is the reaction product of dimethyl terephthalate with 1,4-butanediol to which may have been added certain optional substances to impart desired technological properties to the polymer.
( b ) *Optional adjuvant substances.* Poly(tetramethylene terephthalate) identified in paragraph (a) of this section may contain optional adjuvant substances. The quantity of any optional adjuvant substance employed in the production of the polymer does not exceed the amount reasonably required to accomplish the intended technical or physical effect. Such adjuvants may include substances generally recognized as safe in food, substances used in accordance with prior sanction, and substances permitted under applicable regulations in this part.
( c ) *Specifications.* ( 1 ) Inherent viscosity of a 0.50 percent solution of the polymer in phenol/tetrachloroethane (60/40 weight ratio) solvent is not less than 0.6 as determined using a Wagner viscometer (or equivalent) and calculated from the following equation: where: N*r* = Ratio of flow time of the polymer solution to that of the solvent and c = polymer concentration of the test solution in grams per 100 milliliters.
( 2 ) Poly(tetramethylene terephthalate) in the finished form in which it is to contact food shall yield total extractives as follows: ( i ) Not to exceed 0.08 milligram per square inch of food contact surface when extracted for 2 hours at 250 °F with distilled water.
( ii ) Not to exceed 0.02 milligram per square inch of food contact surface when extracted for 2 hours at 150 °F with *n-*heptane.
( iii ) Not to exceed 0.04 milligram per square inch of food contact surface when extracted for 2 hours at 212 °F with 3 percent aqueous acetic acid.
( iv ) Not to exceed 0.02 milligram per square inch of food contact surface when extracted for 2 hours at 65.6 °C (150 °F) with 50 percent ethanol.
[42 FR 14572, Mar. 15, 1977, as amended at 50 FR 20748, May 20, 1985; 52 FR 20069, May 29, 1987]