alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                              DATA DIMENSIONS, INC.
                    CALCULATIONS OF NET INCOME PER SHARE(1)
                                   (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                             Three Months Ended
                                                                                 March 31,

                                                                       1997                      1996
                                                                    ----------              -------------
<S>                                                                 <C>                     <C>       
Actual weighted average shares outstanding
for period                                                          11,459,000                 10,506,000

Dilutive common stock options using the treasury
stock method                                                           341,000                    687,000
                                                                    ----------                 ----------
Total shares used in per share calculations                         11,800,000                 11,193,000(1)
                                                                    ==========                 ==========
Net Income                                                            $296,000                     $2,000
                                                                    ==========                 ==========
Net income per share(2)                                                  $0.03                      $0.00(1)
                                                                    ==========                 ==========
</TABLE>




(1) Adjusted to give effect to a 3 for 1 stock split effective March 20, 1997.

(2) Fully diluted earnings per share is not disclosed on the consolidated
    statement of operations for the three month periods ended March 31, 1997 and
    1996, since it is not more than three percent different from primary
    earnings per share.



Page 12 of 13
DAILY READING FILF 

SALT RIVER 

PIMA-MARICOPA INDIAN COMMUNITY 

10005 East Osborn Road / Scottsdale, Arizona 85256-9722 / Phone (480) 362-7400 / Fax (480) 362-7593 

Ms. Lisa Jackson 

Administrator 

Environmental Protection Agency 

Ariel Rios Building 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Mail Code 11O1A 

Washington, DC 20460 

Re: Request for Consultation Regarding NGS BART Proceeding 

Dear Ms. Jackson: 

On May 20, 2011, the Gila River Indian Community wrote to you requesting that formal 

government-to-government consultation be initiated pursuant to the May 2, 2011 EPA 

Policy on Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribes in connection with EPA's 

ongoing Navajo Generating Station (NGS) Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) 

rulemaking. We are writing to join that request for consultation. 

Government-to-government consultation is necessary and appropriate prior to EPA taking 

any further action to advance the rulemaking, given the far-reaching and significant 

implications that EPA's BART determination for NGS could have for many tribal 

economies and cultures. As stated in the Community's May 20th letter, the gravity of 

these implications necessitates high-level and extensive consultations, and we urge you to 

initiate them as soon as possible in a manner that comports with the EPA's Policy and its 

trust obligations to tribes.

DianeEno 

President
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > First Jobs of College Women: Report on Women Graduates, Class of 1957

              																	United States. Women's Bureau. 						*First Jobs of College Women: Report on Women Graduates, Class of 1957 : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 268*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1959,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5537,			accessed on September 20, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
**EXHIBIT 23.2****Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No.33-73044, No. 33-58037, No. 333-33433 and No. 333-34549) and in the Registration Statement on FormS-4 (No. 33-65229) of Bell Industries, Inc. of our report dated April 7, 2006, except for the firstparagraph of Note 2, as to which the date is April 28, 2006, relating to the financial statementsand financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K./s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
§ 1271.27 Will FDA assign me a registration number? ( a ) FDA will assign each location a permanent registration number.
( b ) FDA acceptance of an establishment registration and HCT/P listing form does not constitute a determination that an establishment is in compliance with applicable rules and regulations or that the HCT/P is licensed or approved by FDA.
###### Editorial Note on Part 177

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 177 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 70 FR 72074, Dec. 1, 2005; and 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

#### § 177.2280 4,4′-Isopropylidenediphenolepichlorohydrin thermosetting epoxy resins.

4,4′-Isopropylidenediphenol-epichlo-rohydrin thermosetting epoxy resins may be safely used as articles or components of articles intended for repeated use in producing, manufacturing, packing, processing, preparing, treating, packaging, transporting, or holding food, in accordance with the following prescribed conditions:

(a) The basic thermosetting epoxy resin is made by reacting 4,4′-isopropylidenediphenol with epichlorohydrin.

(b) The resin may contain one or more of the following optional substances provided the quantity used does not exceed that reasonably required to accomplish the intended effect:

| Allyl glycidyl ether | As curing system additive. |
| --- | --- |
| Di- and tri-glycidyl ester mixture resulting from the reaction of epichlorohydrin with mixed dimers and trimers of unsaturated C18 monobasic fatty acids derived from animal and vegetable fats and oils | As modifier at levels not to exceed equal parts by weight of the 4,4′-isopropylidenediphenol-epichlorohydrin basic resin and limited to use in contact with alcoholic beverages containing not more than 8 percent of alcohol. |
| 1,2-Epoxy-3-phenoxypropane | As curing system additive. |
| Glyoxal | Do. |
| 4,4′-Isopropylidenediphenol | Do. |
| 4,4′-Methylenedianiline | Do. |
| *m-*Phenylenediamine | Do. |
| Tetrahydrophthalic anhydride | Do. |

(c) In accordance with good manufacturing practice, finished articles containing the resins shall be thoroughly cleansed prior to their first use in contact with food.

(d) The provisions of this section are not applicable to 4,4′-isopropylidenedi-phenol-epichlorohydrin resins listed in other sections of parts 174, 175, 176, 177, 178 and 179 of this chapter.

[42 FR 14572, Mar. 15, 1977; 49 FR 5748, Feb. 15, 1984]
§ 186.1756 Sodium formate. ( a ) Sodium formate (CHNaO2, CAS Reg. No. 141-53-7) is the sodium salt of formic acid. It is produced by the reaction of carbon monoxide with sodium hydroxide.
( b ) The ingredient is used as a constituent of paper and paperboard used for food packaging.
( c ) The ingredient is used at levels not to exceed good manufacturing practice in accordance with § 186.1(b)(1).
( d ) Prior sanctions for sodium formate different from the uses established in this section do not exist or have been waived.
[45 FR 22915, Apr. 4, 1980]
<PAGE>

                            Certification Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Medialink Worldwide
Incorporated (the "Company"), hereby certifies to such officer's knowledge, that
the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 14, 2002                           /s/ J. Graeme McWhirter
                                                 -----------------------------
                                                 Name:  J. Graeme McWhirter
                                                 Title: Chief Financial Officer


         The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2011-NM-187-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
IIB 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7280 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 23, 2024 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 

Urban Affairs 

AN ACT 

To require the Inspector General of the Department of Housing and Urban Development to testify before the Congress annually, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

HR 7280 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘HUD Transparency 

3 Act of 2024’’. 

4 SEC. 2. CONGRESSIONAL TESTIMONY. 

5 Not later than October 1 of each year, the Inspector 

6 General of the Department of Housing and Urban Devel7 opment shall appear before the Committee on Financial 

8 Services of the House of Representatives and the Com9 mittee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the 

10 Senate and present testimony on the Office of Inspector 

11 General’s— 

12 (1) efforts to detect and prevent fraud, waste, 

13 and abuse; 

14 (2) ability to conduct and supervise audits, in15 vestigations, and reviews; 

16 (3) actions to identify opportunities for the pro17 grams of the Department of Housing and Urban 

18 Development to progress and succeed; 

19 (4) recommendations to improve overall effi20 ciency and public accountability; 

21 (5) assessment of the extent to which the De22 partment of Housing and Urban Development has 

23 resources sufficient to carry out its statutory mis24 sion; and 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

HR 7280 RFS

1 (6) ongoing activities regarding any such addi2 tional work, as appropriate. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 22, 2024. 

Attest: KEVIN F. MCCUMBER, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
38254.

#### ORR *et al.*v. SMITH.

Decided June 17, 1960

Rehearing denied July 5,1960.

*42
      *D. W. Rolader,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Smith, Field, Ringel, Martin ■& Carr, Palmer Ft. Ansley,*contra.

Felton, Chief Judge.

The only question argued by counsel is whether the contract of listing is too vague and indefinite to support a cause of action for the recovery of sales commissions. The contention of the defendant in error is that (1) the description of the property is too vague and indefinite and (2) ’that the price is too vague and indefinite, but only the first point is argued. The second contention is obviously without merit.

*43A contract listing real property for sale with a broker is not subject to the same rales as a contract for the purchase and sale of real property. It does not come within the statute of frauds so as to require that it be in writing. *Lingo v. Blair,*32 Ga. App. 111 (122 S. E. 802); *Cantrell v. Johnston,*74 Ga. App. 74 (2) (38 S. E. 2d 893) and cases cited. It was stated in *Crawford v. English,*26 Ga. App. 563, 568 (106 S. E. 621): “We do not think that the description of property placed in the hands of a broker for sale needs be as definite and complete as that which should be made in deeds of conveyance.” We think that this should be the true rule and we are of the opinion that it is the majority rule over the nation even in States which require a brokerage contract, or contract of listing, to be in writing. 80 A. L. R. 1466. We are of the opinion that all that is necessary to recover on such a contract is to allege and prove that the property attempted to be described in the contract is the same property intended to be listed by the owner and offered for sale by the broker. When this is shown to the satisfaction of the triers of fact we do not see how any harm can be done, especially in view of the fact the contract is not required to be in writing. To illustrate: the owner of a house shows a broker to a house, points it out and offers him a commission to sell it for a fixed price or on other terms. The property has not been described, but could it reasonably be said that the broker did not earn a commission if he sold the house pointed out to him and otherwise complied with the contract of listing? We think not. We think the petition in this case is sufficient to allege as against general demurrer that the houses sold were those listed. If the broker showed and sought to sell the wrong houses and did not interest the purchasers in the right ones it could be shown as a matter of defense. All of the cases cited by the defendant in error are cases involving contracts of purchase and sale and not mere listing contracts.

The court erred in sustaining the motion to dismiss the petition.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Nichols and Bell, JJ., concur.*
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 934 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 934

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      December 7, 2006.
Whereas life and death situations confront hundreds of thousands of persons 
        within the United States each year due to life threatening illness or 
        injury;
Whereas advance directives offer individuals the opportunity to discuss with 
        loved ones and family members in advance and decide what measures would 
        be appropriate for them when it comes to end-of-life care;
Whereas the preparation of an advance directive, would advise family members, 
        medical providers, and other persons of how an individual would want to 
        be treated in certain crisis situations;
Whereas physicians, other health care providers, clergy, legal counsel, and 
        family members should, or may, provide guidance and insight into 
        determining the final wishes of a person when an advance directive is 
        being prepared;
Whereas to avoid any legal or medical confusion due to the emotions involved in 
        end-of-life decisions, it is in the best interest of all Americans that 
        each person over the age of 18 communicate his or her wishes by creating 
        an advance directive; and
Whereas the designation of the first week of April each year as Plan Ahead with 
        an Advance Directive Week would give honor and respect to all persons as 
        they make critical decisions about their end-of-life care and allow 
        death with dignity according to their own decisions: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of Plan Ahead with an Advance 
        Directive Week;
            (2) encourages each person in the United States who is over the age 
        of 18 to prepare an advance directive to assist his or her family 
        members and medical professionals and others as they honor his or her 
        final wishes; and
            (3) encourages medical, civic, educational, religious, and other 
        nonprofit organizations to encourage individuals to prepare advance 
        directives to ensure that their wishes and rights with respect to end-
        of-life care are protected.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
```

Exhibit 32.1

                        CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of M & F Worldwide Corp. (the
"Company") for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Howard
Gittis, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

 /s/ Howard Gittis
------------------------------
Name:  Howard Gittis
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date:  March 11, 2005
```
H. Res. 925

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

July 20, 2006.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it 

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order 

to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 5684) to implement 

the United States-Oman Free Trade Agreement. The bill 

shall be considered as read. The bill shall be debatable for 

two hours equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 

ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and 

Means. Pursuant to section 151 of the Trade Act of 1974, 

the previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 

bill to final passage without intervening motion. 

SEC. 2. During consideration of H.R. 5684 pursuant to 

this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous 

question, the Chair may postpone further consideration of the 
2

•HRES 925 EH 

bill to a time designated by the Speaker in consonance with 

section 151 of the Trade Act of 1974. 

Attest:

Clerk.
#### SIEGEL, Respondent, v. SIEGEL, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 19, 1914.)

Action by Matie Vaughn Siegel against Henry Siegel.

Mortimer Boyle, of New York City, for appellant.

Nash Rockwood, of New York City, for respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Order filed.
Exhibit 10.22
                                      No. 2

                           SPECIAL RETENTION AGREEMENT


     This  Agreement  is entered  into this 18th day of  September,  2000 by and
between  AMCOL  International  Corporation  ("Company")  and Ryan F.  McKendrick
("Employee").

     WHEREAS, the Company considers it essential and in the best interest of the
Company  and  its  Shareholders  to  foster  the  continued  employment  of  key
management personnel;

     WHEREAS,  Ryan F. McKendrick is presently  employed as President of Colloid
Environmental Technologies Company.


     IT IS THEREFORE AGREED AS FOLLOWS:

     1.  The  Company  will  pay to  Employee  the  amount  of  $230,000.00,  as
consideration  for  the  Employee  remaining  employed  by  the  Company  or its
subsidiaries and continuing his or her duties until the completion of *.

     2. No payment is due in the event the Employee  shall  terminate his or her
employment,  directly or indirectly, prior to a change in control or such change
in  control  does not occur  within one year from the date  hereof.  A change in
control  is  defined  as: the  change in the legal or  beneficial  ownership  of
fifty-one  percent  (51%) of the shares of the  Company's  common stock within a
six-month  period other than by death or operation of law, or the sale of ninety
percent  (90%) or more of the  Company's  aggregate  assets  within a  six-month
period.  Sale of the Company's  stock in a subsidiary or a  subsidiary's  assets
shall not be considered a Change in Control.

     3. The Company may terminate  Employee at any time,  with or without cause,
although  termination  without  cause by the  Company  within one (1) month of a
change in control shall be considered a termination upon a change in control.



*    An asterisk  represents certain material which has been omitted pursuant to
     a request for confidential treatment filed with the Securities and Exchange
     Commission. Such omitted material has been filed separately with the SEC.
<PAGE>
     4. The  Employee  shall also be  considered  an  employee of the Company if
employed by a subsidiary.

     5. Any  payments  received  pursuant  to this  Agreement  shall be credited
against any payments due under any Change in Control Agreement, the Employee has
with the Company.

     6. The payment  pursuant to this Agreement shall be made upon completion of
*.

     7. This Agreement shall expire one (1) year from the date hereof.


                                            AMCOL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION


                                            By:       /s/ Larry Washow
                                            Title:   President



                                            EMPLOYEE:


                                             /s/ Ryan F. McKendrick
                                            Ryan F. McKendrick