The Regional Administrator for EPA Region 9, J ared Blumenfeld , signed the following notice on A pril 25 , 2013 , and EPA is submitting it for publication in the Federal Register (FR). We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version. Please refer to the official version in a forthcoming FR publication, which will appear on the Government Printing Office’s FDSys website ( https://fdsys.gpo.gov/fdsys/search/home.action ) and on Regulations.gov ( http://www.regulations.gov ) in Docket No. EPA

- R09

- OAR

- 201 3

- 0 06 4

. **ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52**  **[EPA -**  **R09 -**  **OAR -**  **2013 -**  **0064; FRL -**  **] Revision of Air Quality Implementation Plan; California;**  **Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District;**  **Stationary Source Permits**
**AGENCY:** Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
**ACTION:** Final rule and technical amendments
. **SUMMARY:** EPA is finalizing approval of two permitting rules submitted by California as a revision to the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District (SMAQMD or District) portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions were proposed in the Federal Register on February 14, 2013 and concern construction and modification of stationary sources of a ir pollution within Sacramento County. We are approving local rules that regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA). Final approval of these rules makes the rules federally enforceable and corrects program deficiencies identified in a previous EPA rulemaking (76 FR 43183, July 20, 2011). EPA is also making technical amendments to the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) toThis document is a pre

- publication version, signed by Regional Administrator, J ared Blumenfeld on 4 /25 / 201 3

. We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version. 2 reflect this previous rulemaking, which removed an obsolete provision from the California SIP.
**EFFEC TIVE DATE:**  This rule is effective on [ Insert date 30 days from the date of publication in the Federal Register ].
**ADDRESSES:** EPA has established docket number EPA

- R09

- OAR

- 2013

- 0064 for this action. Generally, documents in the docket for this action are ava ilable electronically at www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all documents are listed at www.regulations.gov , some information may be publicly available only at the hard co py location (e.g., copyrighted material, large maps, multi

- volume reports), and some may not be publicly available in either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard
copy m aterials, please schedule an appointment during normal business hours with the contact listed in the **FOR FURTHER**
**INFORMATION CONTACT** section.
**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:** Laura Yannayon, EPA Region IX, (415) 972

- 3534, yannayon.laura@epa.gov.
**SUPPLEMEN TARY INFORMATION:**  Throughout this document, “we,” “us” and “our” refer to EPA. **Table of Contents**
I. Proposed ActionThis document is a pre

- publication version, signed by Regional Administrator, J ared Blumenfeld on 4 /25 / 201 3

. We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version. 3
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
**I. Proposed Action**  On February 14, 2013 (78 FR 10589), EPA proposed to fully approve the following rules that were submitted for incorporation into the California SIP. Table 1

- Submitted Rules Local Agency Rule # Rule Title Amended / Adopted Submitted SMAQMD 214 Federal New Source Review Amended 8/23/12 9/26/12 SMAQMD 217 Public Notice Requirements for Permits Adopted 8/23/12 9/26/12

We proposed to approve these rules based on a conclusion that they satisfy the applicable CAA requirements. Our proposed rule and related Technical Support Document (TSD) contain more information on the basis for this rulemaking and on our evaluation of the submitted rules.
**II. Public Comments and EPA Responses**  EPA’s proposed action provided a 30

- day public comment period. During this period, we received one comment from the SMAQMD. We summarize the comment and provide our response below.
Comment: The SMAQMD requested confirmation that EPA’sThis document is a pre

- publication version, signed by Regional Administrator, J ared Blumenfeld on 4 /25 / 201 3

. We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version. 4 final rule to approve Rule 214 and Rule 217 into the SIP will remove the 1984 version of Rule 202 (“New Source Review”) from the California SIP. The District stated that, based on EPA’s statements in the TSD f or a previous rulemaking action on SMAQMD permitting rules that were intended to replace Rule 202 in the SIP (76 FR 43183, July 20, 2011), the District had expected that Rule 202 would be removed from the SIP but that the necessary language to amend the Ca lifornia SIP in 40 CFR part 52 had not been included in EPA’s final rule. The SMAQMD stated that it supports EPA’s proposed approvals and requests only that the regulatory language to delete Rule 202 from the SIP be included in EPA’s final action on Rule 2 14 and Rule 217. EPA Response: We agree with the District that SMAQMD Rule 202 should have been removed from the California SIP as a result of the referenced July 20, 2011 final action on SMAQMD permitting rules that were intended to replace Rule 202. Spec ifically, on July 20, 2011, EPA finalized a full approval of Rule 203 and limited approval/limited disapproval of Rule 214
. See 76 FR 43183 (July 20, 2011). EPA explained in the proposal for this rulemaking that “[t]hese two new rules will replace in its e ntirety, the existing SIP approved NSR/PSD programs contained in Rule 202.” 76 FR 28942 at 28943 (May 19, 2011) ; s eeThis document is a pre

- publication version, signed by Regional Administrator, J ared Blumenfeld on 4 /25 / 201 3

. We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version. 5 also U.S. EPA, Region IX, Technical Support Document for EPA’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for the California SIP, Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District, Rule 214 (Federal New Source Review), Rule 203 (Prevention of Significant Deterioratio n), May 6, 2011, at 1 (“U pon approval into the SIP, [ R ules 214 and 203] will replace current SIP Rule 202

– New Source Review , which was approved into the SIP by EPA on June 19, 1985 (50 FR 25417).” EPA received no comments on this proposed rule and finali zed the rulemaking as proposed. See 76 FR 43183 (July 20, 2011). In the final regulatory te xt codifying this final action , however, EPA incorporated Rule 214 and Rule 203 into the SIP but neglected to remove Rule 202. See 76 FR at 43185. In response to SMAQMD’s comment, we are making a technical amendment to 40 CFR 52.220 to correct this error by removing Rule 202 from the SMAQMD portion of the California SIP
. This technical amendment makes no change to the substance of our July 20, 2011 f inal action or to today’s final action to fully approve Rule 214 and Rule 217 into the California SIP.
**III. EPA Action**  No comments were submitted that change our assessment that submitted Rule 214 and Rule 217 satisfy the applicable CAAThis document is a pre

- publication version, signed by Regional Administrator, J ared Blumenfeld on 4 /25 / 201 3

. We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version. 6 requirements. Therefore, under CAA section 110(k)(3) and for the reasons set forth in our February 14, 2013 proposed rule, we are fully approving Rule 214 and Rule 217. This action incorporates the submitted rules into the SMAQMD portion of the California
SIP and makes them federally enforceable. Simultaneously, we are making a technical amendment to 40
CFR 52.220 to remove Rule 202 from the SIP, consistent with the District’s intent and EPA’s final rule at 76 FR 43183 (July 20, 2011).
**IV. Statutory and Executiv**  **e Order Reviews** Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’ s role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this action merely
approve s State law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by State law. For that reason, this final action:

• is not a “significant regulatory action” subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);This document is a pre

- publication version, signed by Regional Administrator, J ared Blumenfeld on 4 /25 / 201 3

. We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version. 7

• does not impose an information collection burden under t he provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);

• is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);

• does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104

- 4);

• does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999 );

• is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);

• is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);

• is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and

• does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address disproportionate human health or environmental effectsThis document is a pre

- publication version, signed by Regional Administrator, J ared Blumenfeld on 4 /25 / 201 3

. We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version. 8 with practical, appropriate, and legally permissible methods under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, this final rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the State, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs o n tribal governments or preempt tribal law. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Air pollution control, Environmental protection, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeepin g requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

_____ April 25, 2013

___ /signed by/

_________ Dated: Jared Blumenfeld, Regional Administrator, Region IX.The Regional Administrator for EPA Region 9, J ared Blumenfeld , signed the following notice on A pril 25 , 2013 , and EPA is submitting it for publication in the Federal Register (FR). We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version. Please refer to the official version in a forthcoming FR publication, which will appear on the Government Printing Office’s FDSys website ( https://fdsys.gpo.gov/fdsys/search/home.action ) and on Regulations.gov ( http://www.regulations.gov ) in Docket No. EPA

- R09

- OAR

- 201 3

- 0 06 4

.

Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:

PART 52

- [AMENDED] 1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:
**AUTHORITY:** 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart F

- California 2. Section 52.220 is amended by revising paragraph (c )( 159 ) and adding paragraph (c)( xxx) to read as follows:
§ 52.220 Identification of plan
.

* * * * * (c) * * *

* * * * * ( 159 ) * * * (i) * * * (A) * * * (B) Previously approved on February 6, 1985 and now deleted without replacement : Rule 202.

* * * * * ( x xx ) New and amended regulations were submitted on SeptemberThis document is a pre

- publication version, signed by Regional Administrator, J ared Blumenfeld on 4 /25 / 201 3

. We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version. 10 26 , 201 2 , by the Governor’s Designee
. (i) Inc orporation by Reference. (A) Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District. ( 1 ) Rule 214, “Federal New Source Review,” as amended on August 23, 2012. ( 2 ) Rule 217, “Public Notice Requirements for Permits,” as adopted on August 23, 2012.

* * * * *