alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,360
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  105,724
<ALLOWANCES>                                    12,363
<INVENTORY>                                     42,309
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          23,223
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,880
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 198,498
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        61,848
<OTHER-SE>                                      79,414
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   198,498
<SALES>                                        170,817
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               200,957
<CGS>                                           48,059
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   49,458
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                11,865
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 353
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 38,754
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,723
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             24,031
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    24,031
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.38
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk July 9, 2009

0701 

# Order

July 9, 2009

138696

SUPERIOR HOTELS, L.L.C., Petitioner-Appellant,

v SC: 138696 COA: 276836 MTT: 00-313228 TOWNSHIP OF MACKINAW, Respondent-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the March 10, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall include among the issues to be brie fed whether the State Tax Commission has jurisdiction, pursuant to MCL 211.154(1), to correct the taxa ble value of real property erroneously recorded on th e local assessment roll.

The Michigan Townsh ips Association is invited to file a brief amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the dete rmination of the issue presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > State Laws Affecting Working Women

              																	United States. Women's Bureau					,	Gordon, Mildred J.					 and 	Frankfurter, Estelle S. 						*State Laws Affecting Working Women : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 16*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1921,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5340,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
#### § 1308.47 Control of immediate precursors.

Pursuant to section 201(e) of the Act (21 U.S.C. 811(e)), the Administrator may, without regard to the findings required by subsection 201(a) or 202 (b) of the Act (21 U.S.C. 811(a) or 812(b)) and without regard to the procedures prescribed by § 1308.41 or subsections 201 (a) and (b) of the Act (21 U.S.C. 811(a) and (b)), issue and publish in the Federal Register an order controlling an immediate precursor. The order shall designate the schedule in which the immediate precursor is to be placed, which shall be the same schedule in which the controlled substance of which it is an immediate precursor is placed or any other schedule with a higher numerical designation. An order controlling an immediate precursor shall become effective 30 days from the date of publication in the Federal Register, unless the Administrator finds that conditions of public health or safety necessitate an earlier effective date, in which event the Administrator shall specify in the order his findings as to such conditions.

[38 FR 8254, Mar. 30, 1973. Redesignated at 38 FR 26609, Sept. 24, 1973, and further redesignated at 62 FR 13968, Mar. 24, 1997]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

August 16, 2024

SC-2024-0413

Ex parte Colton Trent Ketchum PETITION FOR WRIT OF 

CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS (In re: Colton 

Trent Ketchum v. State of Alabama) (Mobile Circuit Court: CC-21-2979; 

Criminal Appeals: CR-2023-0611).

CERTIFICATE OF JUDGMENT

WHEREAS, the petition for writ of certiorari in the above 

referenced cause has been duly submitted and considered by the 

Supreme Court of Alabama and the judgment indicated below was 

entered in this cause on August 16, 2024:

Writ Denied. No Opinion. Mitchell, J. -- Parker, C.J., and Shaw, 

Bryan, and Mendheim, JJ., concur.

NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Rule 41, Ala. R. App. P., IT IS 

HEREBY ORDERED that this Court's judgment in this cause is certified 

on this date. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise ordered 

by this Court or agreed upon by the parties, the costs of this cause are 

hereby taxed as provided by Rule 35, Ala. R. App. P.

I, Megan B. Rhodebeck, certify that this is the record of the judgment of the Court, witness 

my hand and seal.

Clerk, Supreme Court of Alabama
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# AGENCY:

Federal Election Commission.

# Date and Time: 

Wednesday, February 24, 2010, at 11:30 a.m.

# Place: 

999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.

# Status: 

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# Items To Be Discussed:

Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g.

Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, 438(b), and Title 26, U.S.C.

Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or arbitration.

Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a particular employee.

* * * * *

# DATE AND TIME:

Thursday, February 25, 2010, at 10 a.m.

# Place: 

999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor). 

# STATUS:

 This meeting will be open to the public.

## Items To Be Discussed

Correction and Approval of Minutes.

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on FEC Standards of Conduct.

# Draft Advisory Opinion 2010-01: 

Nevada State Democratic Party by its counsel, Marc E. Elias and Graham M. Wilson.

Management and Administrative Matters.

Individuals who plan to attend and require special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact Darlene Harris, Acting Commission Secretary, at (202) 694-1040, at least 72 hours prior to the hearing date.

# Person To Contact For Information:

 Judith Ingram, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Signed:

Darlene Harris,

Acting Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2010-3589 Filed 2-24-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
Exhibit 99.1

 

Section 906 Certification

 

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Inland's Monthly Income Fund, L.P. (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;

(2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(3) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inland's Monthly Income Fund, L.P.

 

 

By: Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation

       General Partner

 

/S/ Brenda G. Gujral_________________________________

Name: Brenda G. Gujral

Title: President of the General Partner and

          Principal Executive Officer of Inland's Monthly Income Fund, L.P

Date: May 12, 2003
#### Mazur et al. v. Roughsedge Brothers, Inc., et al.

*Daniel J. Flood*and *James L.*Brown, for plaintiffs.

*Mitchell Jenkins*and *E. E. Hosey,*for defendants.

July 20, 1950.

Valentine, P. J.,

Flat Road is a public street of the Borough of Plymouth. Since June 5, 1950, defendants, Roughsedge Brothers, Inc., and Sidney Fewins have used the same for the transportation of coal and dirt. For this purpose trucks and tractors have been, and now are, being operated on the street.

The complaint charges that the use of the street thus made amounts, in effect, to a confiscation of the highway, making ingress and egress to the properties located thereon difficult, causing undue noise and dust, which interferes with the welfare and comfort of the residents.

The prayers for relief are:

> “ (b) That defendants and their agents be individually and collectively enjoined from trafficking and haul-ting Flat Road, Plymouth, Luzerne County, Pa.

> “(c) That defendants, Roughsedge Brothers, Inc., and Sidney Fewins, and their agents, be enjoined from trafficking on Flat Road, Plymouth, Luzerne County, Pa., in any manner that will interfere with the freedom and access of ingress and egress to the property of plaintiffs and the persons living on the lands abutting Flat Road, Plymouth, Luzerne County, Pa.

> *144“(d) That the proper officials of Plymouth Borough be directed, and a mandatory injunction be granted directing the officials to enact a proper ordinance to protect the residents of Flat Road, Plymouth, Luzerne County, Pa., from the above described illegal, negligent and careless use of Flat Road, Plymouth, Luzerne County, Pa., by any hauler or trucker.”

We are not asked to regulate the type or size of the loads carried by the trucks or tractors, nor to restrict the days or hours during which the vehicles may be operated.

The testimony establishes that the interference with ingress and egress to the use of the properties is incidental to the use of the highway by the trucks and tractors of defendants.

The Borough Code confers upon the officials of boroughs power to regulate the roads, streets, lanes and alleys therein: Act of May 4,1927, P. L. 519, sec. 1202; 53 PS §13313.

The use of the streets may be limited, controlled and regulated by proper municipal action. The management and control of them involves the exercise of legislative and administrative functions: 25 Am. Jur. 545, sec. 253. The regulation of traffic over the streets of a borough is a matter for the public officials (Wilbur et al. v. City of Newton, 301 Mass. 97, 16 N. E. (2d) 86; Livingston v. Wolf, 136 Pa. 519; Walker v. Commonwealth, 40 Pa. Superior Ct. 638) and not for the courts: Sumner County v. Interurban Trans. Co., 141 Tenn. 493, 213 S. W. 412; Perlmutter et al. v. Greene, 259 N. Y. 327, 182 N. E. 5.

We know of no law which confers upon a chancellor authority to determine the type of legislation which shall be enacted by borough officials. For failure to take proper action they are amenable to the electorate but not to the courts.

Therefore, the rule is discharged.
| USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS |
|----------------------------------|
| OFR 99–0557: Online Report |

|                                                                                                                                     |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   About USGS /  Science Topics /  Maps, Products & Publications /  Education / FAQ |
|                                                                                                                                     |

## Digitized Aeromagnetic Datasets for the Conterminous United States, Hawaii,  and Puerto Rico 

 **Disclaimer:**  Not all of the United States has been digitized.  The grid that was used to generate this image of the Magnetic Anomaly of  the conterminous United States  (shaded from the NW) is available on the USGS Digital Data Series #9 (DDS-9)  CD-ROM.  Another option to acquire this grid is an anonymous FTP site on the UNIX server  ftpext.usgs.gov/pub/cr/co/denver/musette. The AAA_README  in pub/cdrom_DDS-9 explains available files

----

The data available here are a compilation of digitally converted analog magnetic  field intensity maps.  These maps are either USGS or publicly accessible publications.  They were generated as needed to fulfill USGS project requirements. 

### Choose from one of the following states or territory. 

**Alabama FloridaKansasMinnesotaNew JerseyOregonTexasWyomingArizonaGeorgiaKentuckyMississippiNew MexicoPennsylvaniaUtahArkansasHawaiiLouisianaMissouriNew YorkPuerto RicoVirginiaCaliforniaIdahoMaineMontanaNorth CarolinaRhode IslandVermontColoradoIllinoisMarylandNebraskaNorth DakotaSouth CarolinaWashingtonConnecticutIndianaMassachusettsNevadaOhioSouth DakotaWest VirginiaDelawareIowaMichiganNew HampshireOklahomaTennesseeWisconsin**
**Composite and MergedAeromagnetic Data forAlaska**

----

  For further information about aeromagnetic data holdings at the U.S. Geological    Survey, please contact   Pat Hill, (303) 236-1343, email (pathill@usgs.gov), or   Bob Kucks, (303) 236-1405, email (rkucks@usgs.gov).   

**USGS Central RegionHomeNews ReleasesProject Personnel**

This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S.  Geological Survey editorial standards. Use of brand names is for descriptive  purposes and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey.
Last modified 2/1/2000.
AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices
U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey      URL: https://pubsdata.usgs.gov/pubs/of/1999/ofr-99-0557/html/mag_home.htmQuestions or Assistance: USGS Web ContactPage Last Modified: Wed Dec  7 17:02 EDT 2016
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PHYSICIAN CORPORATION OF AMERICA FOR THE
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          143485
<SECURITIES>                                    146455
<RECEIVABLES>                                    62845
<ALLOWANCES>                                     51674
<INVENTORY>                                        372
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                504817
<PP&E>                                           75254
<DEPRECIATION>                                   24142
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1200228
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           590668
<BONDS>                                           9746
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           388
<OTHER-SE>                                     (64580)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1200228
<SALES>                                         356749
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                365484
<CGS>                                           350898
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   355324
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  5218
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                5203
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   4942
<INCOME-TAX>                                       319
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               4623
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      4623
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .12
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit








EX-10.3



April 24, 2017
William K. Grogan
c/o IDEX Corporation
1925 West Field Court, Suite 200, 
Lake Forest, IL  60045-4824


Re:  Amendment of Letter Agreement Dated December 30, 2016


Dear Bill:


This letter agreement will confirm an amendment to the letter agreement (“Letter Agreement”) dated December 30, 2016 between you and IDEX Corporation (“IDEX”).  


The Letter Agreement is amended by deleting the thirteenth bullet point provisions, which provide for payments due to you if your employment with IDEX is terminated without cause, and such provisions will no longer be in effect.  


You and IDEX hereby agree to the addition of the following provisions to the Letter Agreement:


		
	•
	If, in the future, your employment with IDEX Corporation is terminated, without cause (“cause” defined as willful misconduct or fraudulent behavior), IDEX will pay you twelve (12) months base salary at the then current monthly base rate plus your targeted annual incentive bonus in exchange for you signing, and not revoking, an IDEX-standard Severance Agreement & General Release Agreement.  These payments are subject to tax withholdings and deductions.  Such benefit will not be applicable in the event of your voluntary termination.  




Please indicate your acceptance of these provisions below.


Best regards, 


/s/ JEFFREY D. BUCKLEW


Jeffrey D. Bucklew
SVP, Chief Human Resources Officer 
IDEX Corporation 
1925 West Field Court
Suite 200
Lake Forest, IL 60045


	
			
	April 24, 2017
	 
	/s/ WILLIAM K. GROGAN

	Date
	 
	Acceptance of Provisions

	 
	 
	William K. Grogan
[No. 39811-3-I.

Division One.

December 1, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Christopher John Kmieciak, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 96-1-03685-1, Faith Enyeart Ireland, J., entered November 25, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear at 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 117.405 Requirement to establish and implement a supply-chain program. ( a ) ( 1 ) Except as provided by paragraphs (a)(2) and (3) of this section, the receiving facility must establish and implement a risk-based supply-chain program for those raw materials and other ingredients for which the receiving facility has identified a hazard requiring a supply-chain-applied control.
( 2 ) A receiving facility that is an importer, is in compliance with the foreign supplier verification program requirements under part 1, subpart L of this chapter, and has documentation of verification activities conducted under § 1.506(e) of this chapter (which provides assurance that the hazards requiring a supply-chain-applied control for the raw material or other ingredient have been significantly minimized or prevented) need not conduct supplier verification activities for that raw material or other ingredient.
( 3 ) The requirements in this subpart do not apply to food that is supplied for research or evaluation use, provided that such food: ( i ) Is not intended for retail sale and is not sold or distributed to the public;
( ii ) Is labeled with the statement “Food for research or evaluation use”;
( iii ) Is supplied in a small quantity that is consistent with a research, analysis, or quality assurance purpose, the food is used only for this purpose, and any unused quantity is properly disposed of; and
( iv ) Is accompanied with documents, in accordance with the practice of the trade, stating that the food will be used for research or evaluation purposes and cannot be sold or distributed to the public.
( b ) The supply-chain program must be written.
( c ) When a supply-chain-applied control is applied by an entity other than the receiving facility's supplier (*e.g.,* when a non-supplier applies controls to certain produce (*i.e.,* produce covered by part 112 of this chapter), because growing, harvesting, and packing activities are under different management), the receiving facility must: ( 1 ) Verify the supply-chain-applied control; or
( 2 ) Obtain documentation of an appropriate verification activity from another entity, review and assess the entity's applicable documentation, and document that review and assessment.
[80 FR 56145, Sept. 17, 2015; 81 FR 3956, Jan. 25, 2016]