8322 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 36 / Wednesday, February 24, 2010 / Notices 

1Standardization of Generator Interconnection 

Agreements and Procedures, 104 FERC ¶ 61,103 

(2003) (Order No. 2003); Standardization of 

Generator Interconnection Agreements and 

Procedures, 106 FERC ¶ 61,220 (2004) (Order No. 

2003–A). 

NEPOOL Participants Committee 

• February 5 (Boston, MA). 

• March 5 (Location TBD). 

• April 9 (Location TBD). 

• May 7 (Location TBD). 

• June 4 (Location TBD). 

• June 21–23 (Location TBD). 

• August 6 (Location TBD). 

• September 17 (Location TBD). 

NEPOOL Markets Committee Meeting 

• February 9–10 (Marlborough, MA). 

• March 9–10 (Marlborough, MA). 

• April 13–14 (Marlborough, MA). 

• May 11–12 (Marlborough, MA). 

• June 8–9 (Marlborough, MA). 

• July 12–14 (Location TBD). 

• August 10–11 (Marlborough, MA). 

• September 14–15 (Marlborough, MA). 

For additional meeting information, 

see http://www.iso-ne.com/committees/ 

comm_wkgrps/index.html. 

The discussions at each of the 

meetings described above may address 

matters at issue in the following 

proceedings: 

Docket No. ER07–397, ISO New England 

Inc. and the New England Power Pool 

Participants Committee 

Docket No. ER08–633, ISO New England 

Inc. 

Docket No. ER08–830, ISO New England 

Inc. 

Docket No. ER08–1209, ISO New 

England Inc. and the New England 

Power Pool Participants Committee 

Docket No. EL09–3, Ashburnham 

Municipal Light Plant, et al. v. 

Berkshire Power Company, LLC, and 

ISO New England Inc. 

Docket No. EL09–47, Richard 

Blumenthal, Attorney General for the 

State of Connecticut v. ISO New 

England Inc., et al. 

Docket No. EL09–48, The Connecticut 

Department of Public Utility Control 

and the Connecticut Office of 

Consumer Counsel v. ISO New 

England Inc., et al. 

Docket No. ER09–1051, ISO New 

England Inc. and the New England 

Power Pool Participants 

Docket No. ER09–1144, ISO New 

England Inc. and the New England 

Power Pool Participants Committee 

Docket No. ER09–1424, ISO New 

England Inc. 

Docket No. ER09–1546, ISO New 

England Inc. and the New England 

Power Pool Participants Committee 

Docket No. ER10–154, ISO New England 

Inc. 

Docket No. ER10–186, ISO New England 

Inc. 

Docket No. ER10–438, ISO New England 

Inc. and the New England Power Pool 

Participants Committee 

For more information, contact 

Michael Isimbabi, Office of Energy 

Market Regulation, Federal Energy 

Regulatory Commission at (202) 502– 

6539 or Michael.isimbabi@ferc.gov. 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2010–3623 Filed 2–23–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

[Docket No. EL10–40–000] 

EPIC Merchant Energy NJ/PA, LP, 

SESCO Enterprises, LLC, Coaltrain 

Energy, LP, Complainants, v. PJM 

Interconnection, LLC, Respondent; 

Notice of Complaint 

February 17, 2010. 

Take notice that on February 1, 2010 

pursuant to section 206 of the Federal 

Power Act and Rule 206 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 18 CFR 385.206 (2009), EPIC 

Merchant Energy NJ/PA, LP, SESCO 

Enterprises, LLC, and Coaltrain Energy 

LP (Complainants) filed a formal 

complaint against PJM Interconnection, 

LLC (Respondent), alleging that the 

Respondent is improperly allocating 

physical transmission line losses to 

virtual transactions and also distributing 

over-collected transmission line losses 

in a manner that discriminates against 

virtual Market Participants. 

Complainants certify that copies of 

the complaint were served on the 

contacts for the Respondent as listed on 

the Commission’s list of Corporate 

Officials. 

Any person desiring to intervene or to 

protest this filing must file in 

accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of 

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). 

Protests will be considered by the 

Commission in determining the 

appropriate action to be taken, but will 

not serve to make protestants parties to 

the proceeding. Any person wishing to 

become a party must file a notice of 

intervention or motion to intervene, as 

appropriate. The Respondent’s answer 

and all interventions, or protests must 

be filed on or before the comment date. 

The Respondent’s answer, motions to 

intervene, and protests must be served 

on the Complainants. 

The Commission encourages 

electronic submission of protests and 

interventions in lieu of paper using the 

‘‘eFiling’’ link at http://www.ferc.gov. 

Persons unable to file electronically 

should submit an original and 14 copies 

of the protest or intervention to the 

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 

888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 

20426. 

This filing is accessible on-line at 

http://www.ferc.gov, using the 

‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for 

review in the Commission’s Public 

Reference Room in Washington, DC. 

There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the 

Web site that enables subscribers to 

receive e-mail notification when a 

document is added to a subscribed 

docket(s). For assistance with any FERC 

Online service, please e-mail 

FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call 

(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call 

(202) 502–8659. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time 

on March 1, 2010. 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2010–3620 Filed 2–23–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

[Docket No. EL10–41–000] 

Tatanka Wind Power, LLC, 

Complainant, v. Montana-Dakota 

Utilities Company, a Division of MDU 

Resources Group, Inc., Respondent; 

Notice of Complaint 

February 17, 2010. 

Take notice that on February 9, 2010, 

pursuant to section 206 of the Rules and 

Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.206 

and Order Nos. 2003 and 2003–A,1

Tatanka Wind Power, LLC 

(Complainant) filed a formal complaint 

against Montana-Dakota Utilities 

Company, a division of MDU Resources 

Group, Inc. (Respondent), alleging that 

the Respondent improperly failed to 

repay Complainant for 100 percent of its 

costs incurred for network upgrades. 

Tatanka certifies that copies of the 

complaint were served on the contacts 

for the Respondent as listed on the 

Commission’s list of Corporate Officials. 

Any person desiring to intervene or to 

protest this filing must file in 

accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of 

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). 

Protests will be considered by the 

Commission in determining the 

appropriate action to be taken, but will 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES