alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                          CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP
                              INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements of our report dated February 6, 2004, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Independence Community Bank Corp., included
in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003:

     Form S-8 No. 333-50987, pertaining to the Independence Community Bank
     401(k) Savings Plan in RSI Retirement Trust

     Form S-8 No. 333-70455, pertaining to the 1998 Stock Option Plan

     Form S-8 No. 333-85981, pertaining to the Stock Options Assumed in
     Acquisition of Broad National Bancorporation

     Form S-8 No. 333-95767, pertaining to the Stock Options Assumed in
     Acquisition of Statewide Financial Corp.

     Form S-8 No. 333-60204, pertaining to the Directors' Fiscal 2002 Stock
     Retainer Plan

     Form S-8 No. 333-83330, pertaining to the Directors' Fee Plan

     Form S-8 No. 333-106193, pertaining to the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan, as
     amended

     Form S-3 No. 333-100897, pertaining to the common stock available for
     resale by Meridian Capital Group, LLC

                                            /s/Ernst & Young LLP

New York, New York
March 8, 2004
Editorial Note on Part 12
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 12 appear at 88 FR 45064, July 14, 2023.

§ 12.45 Notice of participation. ( a ) Within 30 days after publication of the notice of hearing under § 12.35, a person desiring to participate in a hearing is to file with the Dockets Management Staff under § 10.20 a notice of participation in the following form: (Date) Dockets Management Staff, Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Notice of Participation
Docket No. ____

Under 21 CFR part 12, please enter the participation of: (Name) (Street address) (City and State) (Telephone number) Service on the above will be accepted by: (Name) (Street address) (City and State) (Telephone number) The following statements are made as part of this notice of participation: A. *Specific interests.* (A statement of the specific interest of the person in the proceeding, including the specific issues of fact concerning which the person desires to be heard. This part need not be completed by a party to the proceeding.) B. *Commitment to participate.* (A statement that the person will present documentary evidence or testimony at the hearing and will comply with the requirements of 21 CFR 12.85, or, in the case of a hearing before a Public Board of Inquiry, with the requirements of 21 CFR 13.25.) (Signed)
( b ) An amendment to a notice of participation should be filed with the Dockets Management Staff and served on all participants.
( c ) No person may participate in a hearing who has not filed a written notice of participation or whose participation has been stricken under paragraph (e) of this section.
( d ) The presiding officer may permit the late filing of a notice of participation upon a showing of good cause.
( e ) The presiding officer may strike the participation of a person for nonparticipation in the hearing or failure to comply with any requirement of this subpart, e.g., disclosure of information as required by § 12.85 or the prehearing order issued under § 12.92. Any person whose participation is stricken may petition the Commissioner for interlocutory review.
[44 FR 22339, Apr. 13, 1979, as amended at 46 FR 8456, Jan. 27, 1981; 59 FR 14364, Mar. 28, 1994; 68 FR 24879, May 9, 2003]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                          54,276
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,288,156
<ALLOWANCES>                                   147,367
<INVENTORY>                                  1,870,872
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,655,234
<PP&E>                                         823,020
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,057,087
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,464,149
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        23,472
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,037,438
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,057,087
<SALES>                                      2,961,738
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,961,738
<CGS>                                        1,633,891
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,633,891
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,140,300
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              48,821
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                143,481
<INCOME-TAX>                                    53,013
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    90,468
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        

</TABLE>
April 23 , 2015



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

IN THE INTEREST OF K .J.W., A CHILD

NO. 14

- 15

- 00067

- CV

________________________________ To day the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the order signed by the court below on January 8, 2015. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellant , S. J.

- W. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
In The Matter Of: 

### SERVED: DECEMBER31, 2014
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC

DocketNo. FAA-2013-1078 RENAISSANCE JET, INC. ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2012EA390030 Respondent

NOTICE OF HEARING LOCATION
On May 13, 2014, an Order Setting Litigation Dates and Procedures was filed, which noted thatthe location ofthe Hearing would beprovided by separate Notice to the parties. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE thatthe Hearing in this case, set to begin on February 3, 2015, at 9:00 a.m., will be held at the following location: Mecklenburg County Courthouse SixthFloor, Courtroom 6350 832 East Fourth Street Charlotte, NC 28202 The Hearing begins at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Standard Time. Please allow time to pass through security. Weapons ofany kind, as well as cameras and audio/video equipment are prohibited. Briefcases, purses, packages, and the like will be x-rayed. Laptop computers, ipads/tablets,**~md** cellular phones are permitted inthe courthouse.

Attachment: Service ListSERVICE LIST- BY

### U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001



### Mr. Zachary M. Berman 

### Complainant's Counsel ONE COPY



### Office ofthe Regional Counsel, EasternRegion Federal AviationAdministration 1Aviation Plaza Jamaica, NY 11434 TEL: 718-553-3258 FAX: 718-995-5699 Mr. John Adams Hodge 

### Respondent's Counsel John Adams Hodge and Associates, LLC Post Office Box25553 Columbia, SC 292242 

### TEL: 803-783-9001/803-386-1504 FAX: 803-783-9210 Judge J.E. Sullivan 

### US. AdministrativeLawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-6941 FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS No. FAA-2013-1078 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service inperson orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 IndependenceAvenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing DocketClerk, AGC-430. 2 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: John Adams Hodge and Associates, LLC, 136 Stonemark Lane, Suite 10, Columbia, SC 29210.
(July 14, 1969)

#### In the Matter of Pub of Orangeburg, Inc., Petitioner, v. State Liquor Authority, Respondent.

Motion by petitioner for a stay, pending determination of proceeding, dismissed as academic, the proceeding being determined herewith. (See *Matter of Pub of Orangeburg*v. *State Liq. Auth.,*32 A D 2d 1030.) Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
[No. 39140-2-I.

Division One.

January 26, 1998.]

#### Yung-Jen Tsai, *Respondent,*v. The Department of Licensing, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 95-2-30844-9, Charles V. Johnson, J., entered July 1, 1996. *Reversed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 21, 2020

No. 04-19-00889-CR

Cameron Antoine ROBY,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CR6809

The Honorable Velia J. Meza, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On October 18, 2020, this court granted appellant’s request for an extension of time to 

file his brief and ordered appellant to file his brief by December 4, 2020. When the brief was not 

filed, this court then ordered appellant to file a response by December 14, 2020 explaining his 

failure to timely file the brief and what steps were being taken to remedy the deficiency. On 

December 18, 2020, appellant filed a response explaining why he has not been able to file his 

brief and requesting an extension until January 15, 2021 to file his brief.

After consideration, we GRANT appellant’s request for an extension and ORDER

appellant to file his brief by January 15, 2021. Further requests for an extension will be 

disfavored. 

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 21st day of December, 2020.
___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
§ 1250.67 Watering equipment. ( a ) *General requirements.* All servicing area piping systems, hydrants, taps, faucets, hoses, buckets, and other appurtenances necessary for delivery of drinking and culinary water to a conveyance shall be designed, constructed, maintained and operated in such a manner as to prevent contamination of the water.
( b ) *Outlets for nonpotable water.* Outlets for nonpotable water shall be provided with fittings different from those provided for outlets for potable water and each nonpotable water outlet shall be posted with permanent signs warning that the water is unfit for drinking.
( c ) *Ice.* If bulk ice is used for the cooling of drinking water or other beverages, or for food preservation purposes, equipment constructed so as not to become a factor in the transmission of communicable diseases shall be provided for the storage, washing, handling, and delivery to conveyances of such bulk ice, and such equipment shall be used for no other purposes.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6651

TIMOTHY LAMAR ELLIS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WARDEN RUSHTON; JOHN OZMINT, Director; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (CA-03-835-9-25) Submitted: November 18, 2004 Decided: November 24, 2004 Before LUTTIG and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joenathan Shelly Chaplin, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. Samuel Creighton Waters, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Timothy Lamar Ellis, a South Carolina inmate, seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a subst antial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Ellis has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                    SUBSIDIARIES OF ILLUMINET HOLDINGS, INC.

                                Illuminet, Inc.

                              U.S.I. Gateway, Inc.

                          U.S. Intelco Wireless, Inc.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Air Force

# AGENCY:

Department of the Air Force, DoD.

# ACTION:

Teleconference Meeting notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice informs the public that the Global Positioning Systems Wing will be hosting an Interface Control Working Group (ICWG) teleconference meeting for document/s IS-GPS-200E (NAVSTAR GPS Space Segment/Navigation User Interfaces), IS-GPS-705A (NAVSTAR GPS Space Segment/User Segment L5 Interfaces), and IS-GPS-800A (NAVSTAR GPS Space Segment/User Segment L1C Interfaces). The main focus of this meeting is to address proposed changes relevant to the topics of signal coherence, carrier phase noise, and correlation loss.

                        The ICWG Teleconference is open to the general public. Dial-in information is provided below. More information, including Comments Resolution Matrixes (CRMs) and track changed documents, will be posted at:                         *http://www.losangeles.af.mil/​library/​factsheets/​factsheet.asp?​id=​9364.*

Please send all CRM comments to Vimal Gopal by 5 March 2010.

# DATES:

10 March 2010: IS-GPS-200E/IS-GPS-705A/IS-GPS-800A. 8 a.m.-12 p.m. (Pacific Time).

*Dial in Information:*                         Phone: 1-800-FON-SAIC (1-800-366-7242) Code: 4511074.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Vimal Gopal                         *vimal.gopal.ctr@losangeles.af.mi*                        l 1-310-909-7294 or Captain Neal Roach                         *neal.roach@losangeles.af.mil*                         1-310-653-3771.                    

Bao-Anh Trinh, YA-3,

Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2010-3645 Filed 2-25-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-05-P
Exhibit 99.2

Statement of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

 

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, I, Kelly Tucek, the Chief Financial Officer of Inland Monthly Income Fund, L.P. (the "Company"), hereby certify that:

(1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;

(2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(3) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

/S/____________________________________

Name: Kelly Tucek

Title: Chief Financial Officer

Date: August 2, 2002
###### Editorial Note on Part 176

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 176 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; and 70 FR 72074, Dec. 1, 2005.

#### § 176.150 Chelating agents used in the manufacture of paper and paperboard.

The substances named in paragraph (a) of this section may be safely used in the manufacture of paper and paperboard, in accordance with the conditions prescribed in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section:

(a) Chelating agents:

| List of substances | Limitations |
| --- | --- |
| Ammonium fructoheptonate | |
| Ammonium glucoheptonate | |
| Disodium ethylenediamine tetraacetate | |
| Pentasodium salt of diethylenetriamine pentaacetate | |
| Sodium fructoheptonate | |
| Sodium glucoheptonate | |
| Tetrasodium ethylenediamine tetraacetate | |
| Trisodium *N-*hydroxyethyl ethylenediamine triacetate | |

(b) Any one or any combination of the substances named is used or intended for use as chelating agents.

(c) The substances are added in an amount not greater than that required to accomplish the intended technical effect nor greater than any specific limitation, where such is provided.
#### CHARLES HENDRICKS, PETITIONER-DEFENDANT, v. DIEHM BROTHERS, RESPONDENT-PROSECUTOR.

Submitted January 17, 1939

Decided February 6, 1939.

Before Justices Case, Donges and Porter.

Eor the prosecutor, *Kellogg & Chance.*

*For*the defendant, *Lewis D. Busch*and *Klemmer Kalteissen.*

Per Curiam.

This writ brings up a judgment of the Middlesex County-Court of Common Pleas affirming an award of compensation to the petitioner in the Workmen’s Compensation Bureau. Compensation was sought for an inguinal hernia alleged to have been the result of an accident arising out of and in the course of the employment. The petitioner, who was a carpenter, was standing on a five-foot step ladder nailing a porch column at the top when the ladder tilted over and he and the ladder fell to the ground. He was immediately prostrated with pain and discovered the descent of the hernia in the left groin.

The pertinent provision of the statute, *R. S.*34:15-12x, reads in part:

> “Where there is a real traumatic hernia resulting from the application of force directly to the abdominal wall, either puncturing or tearing the wall, compensation will be allowed. All other cases will be considered as either congenital or of *106slow development and not compensable * * * unless conclusive proof is offered that the hernia was immediately caused by such sudden effort or severe strain that * *

Then follow the five requirements, immediate descent, severe pain, prostration that compels cessation of work, immediate notice to the employer and requirement of medical attention within twenty-four hours.

The prosecutor argues that compliance with these five requirements has not been established by the “conclusive proof” required by the statute. However, we are of the opinion that the evidence reasonably supports a finding that petitioner suffered a traumatic hernia. That he suffered actual bodily violence when he and the step ladder fell together to the ground is a necessary inference. There is nothing to indicate that the hernia was the result of “sudden effort or severe strain.” Petitioner was in good health and free from trouble of this kind before the fall. As soon as he struck the ground he was aware of the pain in the groin and upon examination discovered the lump indicating the descent. We think an entirely reasonable inference is that the condition resulted from a blow on the abdomen sustained in the fall. There being sufficient proof of a traumatic hernia, it was not necessary to prove compliance with the elements required in the ease of hernia by strain.

The judgment below is affirmed, with costs.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 33 (Friday, February 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7525-7526]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3354]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act; Meeting Notice

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETINGS: Nuclear Regulatory Commission [NRC-2010-
0002].

DATES: Week of February 22, 2010.

PLACE: Commissioners' Conference Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 
Maryland.

STATUS: Public and Closed.

ADDITIONAL ITEMS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Week of February 22, 2010

Tuesday, February 23, 2010

    9:25 a.m. Affirmation Session (Public Meeting) (Tentative).
    Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Indian Point Nuclear Generating 
Unit Nos. 1, 2, and 3); Docket Nos. 50-003-LT-2, 50-247-LT-2, 50-286-
LT-2, and 72-51-LT-2. (Request for Hearing on Extension of Time to 
Complete License Transfer) (Tentative).
    This meeting will be Webcast live at the Web address--http://www.nrc.gov.
    The NRC Commission Meeting Schedule can be found on the Internet 
at: http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/policy-making/schedule.html.
* * * * *
    The NRC provides reasonable accommodation to individuals with 
disabilities where appropriate. If you need a reasonable accommodation 
to participate in these public meetings, or need this meeting notice or 
the transcript or other information from the public meetings in another 
format (e.g. braille, large print), please notify Angela Bolduc, Chief, 
Employee/Labor Relations and Work Life Branch, at 301-492-2230, TDD: 
301-415-2100, or by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ccada2aba9a0ade2aea3a0a8b9af8ca2beafe2aba3ba"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4a2b242d2f262b642825262e3f290a243829642d253c">[email protected]</span></a>. Determinations on 
requests for

[[Page 7526]]

reasonable accommodation will be made on a case-by-case basis.
    This notice is distributed electronically to subscribers. If you no 
longer wish to receive it, or would like to be added to the 
distribution, please contact the Office of the Secretary, Washington, 
DC 20555 (301-415-1969), or send an e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4f2b2e3d232a212a61383d2628273b0f213d2c61282039"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3e5a5f4c525b505b10494c5759564a7e504c5d10595148">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: February 16, 2010.
Rochelle C. Bavol,
Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-3354 Filed 2-17-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>