alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.02
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT of 2002

I, ANDERS A. SUAREZ, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004 of
Amerityre Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:
 (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: September 26, 2004


/S/Anders A. Suarez
Anders A. Suarez
Chief Financial Officer
Editorial Note on Part 178
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 178 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 70 FR 72074, Dec. 1, 2005; and 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 178.3750 Polyethylene glycol (mean molecular weight 200-9,500). Polyethylene glycol identified in this section may be safely used as a component of articles intended for use in contact with food, in accordance with the following prescribed conditions: ( a ) The additive is an addition polymer of ethylene oxide and water with a mean molecular weight of 200 to 9,500.
( b ) It contains no more than 0.2 percent total by weight of ethylene and diethylene glycols if its mean molecular weight is 350 or higher and no more than 0.5 percent total by weight of ethylene and diethylene glycols if its mean molecular weight is below 350, when tested by the analytical methods prescribed in § 172.820(b) of this chapter.
( c ) The provisions of paragraph (b) of this section are not applicable to polyethylene glycols used in food-packaging adhesives complying with § 175.105 of this chapter.
Exhibit 31 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE AND
FINANCIAL OFFICER Pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Daniel W. Dowe, certify
that: 1.
 I have
 reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB for the twelve month period ending
 May 31, 2007 (the Report) of American Home Food Products, Inc. (the
 Company);2.
 Based on my
 knowledge, the Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
 fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
 in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
 misleading with respect to the period covered by the Report;3.
 Based on my
 knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included
 in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
 condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
 for, the periods presented in this Report;4.
 I am
 responsible in my dual capacity as the Companys Chief Executive Officer and
 Chief Financial Officer (principal executive and principal financial officer)
 for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
 defined in Exchange Act rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and have:a)
 designed
 such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
 and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
 information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
 is made known to me by others within the Company and its subsidiaries,
 particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;b)
 evaluated
 the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and
 presented in this Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
 disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by the
 Report based on such evaluation; andc)
 disclosed in
 this Report any change in the Companys internal control over financial
 reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter (the
 Companys fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
 affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys
 internal control over financial reporting; and   5.
 I have also
 disclosed as the Companys certifying officer, that based on our most recent
 evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys
 auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or
 persons performing the equivalent function):a)
 all
 significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
 of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
 adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and
 report financial information; andb)
 any fraud,
 whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
 a significant role in the Companys internal controls over financial
 reporting.By:
 /s/ Daniel W.
DoweDaniel W.
DoweChief
Executive Officer andChief
Financial OfficerDate:
 September 7, 2007
Editorial Note on Part 189
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 189 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; and 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005.

§ 189.155 Monochloroacetic acid. ( a ) Monochloroacetic acid is the chemical chloroacetic acid, C2H3ClO2. It is a synthetic chemical not found in natural products, and has been proposed as a preservative in alcoholic and nonalcoholic beverages. Monochloroacetic acid is permitted in food package adhesives with an accepted migration level up to 10 parts per billion (ppb) under § 175.105 of this chapter. The official methods do not detect monochloroacetic acid at the 10 ppb level.
( b ) Food containing any added or detectable level of monochloroacetic acid is deemed to be adulterated in violation of the act based upon trade correspondence dated December 29, 1941 (TC-377).
( c ) The analytical methods used for detecting monochloroacetic acid in food are in sections 20.067-20.072 of the “Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists,” 13th Ed. (1980), which is incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the AOAC INTERNATIONAL, 481 North Frederick Ave., suite 500, Gaithersburg, MD 20877, or may be examined at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .*
[42 FR 14659, Mar. 15, 1977, as amended at 49 FR 10114, Mar. 19, 1984; 54 FR 24899, June 12, 1989]
§ 136.130 Milk bread, rolls, and buns. ( a ) Each of the foods milk bread, milk rolls, and milk buns conforms to the definition and standard of identity and is subject to the requirements for label statement of ingredients prescribed for bread, rolls or buns by § 136.110 except that: ( 1 ) The only moistening ingredient permitted in the preparation of the dough is milk or, as an alternative, a combination of dairy products in such a proportion that the weight of the nonfat milk solids is not more than 2.3 times and not less than 1.2 times the weight of the milkfat therein, with or without water, in a quantity that provides not less than 8.2 parts milk solids for each 100 parts by weight of flour.
( 2 ) No buttermilk, buttermilk product, cheese whey, cheese whey product, or milk protein is used.
( b ) The name of the food is “milk bread”, “milk rolls”, “milk buns”, as applicable.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                      $1,100,495
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            $1,361,729
<PP&E>                                     $22,405,524
<DEPRECIATION>                              $6,992,571
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             $16,774,682
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         $254,421
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,173,804)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               $16,774,682
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              $920,493
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 $512,595
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               $32,452
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            $339,982
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               $ 25,075
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            $25,075
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   $25,075
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $2.53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $2.53
        

</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 7429** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. FREDERICK J. SMITH , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond
. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. ( 3:08

- cr - 00032

- REP

- 1; 3:11

- cv - 00446

- REP )

Submitted : February 19, 2015 Decided: March 10, 2015

Before MOTZ, GREG ORY, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Frederick J. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Arlen Jagels, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Stephen Wiley Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Frederick J. Smith seeks to appeal the district court’s order s denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion and his motion for reconsideration
. The order s are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right .” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable o r wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debata ble, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Smith has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certifica te of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

MATTIE LOMAX,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

WAL-MART STORES EAST, MARIE ELENA 

CASTILLO, JESSY FAIR, CARLOS ESPINOSA, 

SIGFREDO GOMEZ,

Defendants-Appellees

______________________

2023-1734

______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Southern District of Florida in No. 1:09-cv-20901-CMA, 

Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

PER CURIAM.

O R D E R

Mattie Lomax moves to waive Public Access to Court 

Electronic Records (PACER) fees, ECF No. 6. Having considered Ms. Lomax’s response to this court’s May 22, 2023, 

order to show cause, we dismiss and deny her motion. 

Case: 23-1734 Document: 8 Page: 1 Filed: 08/22/2023
2 LOMAX v. WAL-MART STORES EAST

“[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case 

is a jurisdictional requirement,” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 

205, 214 (2007), and, in order to be timely, a notice of appeal must generally be filed within 30 days after entry of 

final judgment, 28 U.S.C. § 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 

4(a)(1)(A). Here, Ms. Lomax filed her notice of appeal more 

than 12 years after the district court order she seeks to appeal. At least because of this untimeliness, we lack jurisdiction over the appeal, and we cannot transfer under 

28 U.S.C. § 1631 because the appeal would not be timely in 

any other court of appeals. 

We note that in the past three months, this court has 

dismissed at least three other appeals by Ms. Lomax for 

similar untimeliness. See Lomax v. Miami Police Dep’t, No. 

2023-1504, slip op. at 1–2 (Fed. Cir. May 18, 2023) (ten 

years late); Lomax v. Cap. Rental Agency, Inc., No. 2023-

1458, slip op. at 2 (Fed. Cir. June 8, 2023) (13 years late); 

Lomax v. Montaldo, No. 2023-1456, slip op. at 2 (Fed. Cir. 

June 13, 2023) (three years late). Ms. Lomax is now well 

aware of the jurisdictional timeliness requirements and is 

warned that continuing to file such appeals, or prosecuting 

such appeals already filed, may constitute abuse of the judicial process warranting sanctions. 

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The appeal is dismissed.

(2) The motion to waive PACER fees is denied.

(3) Each side shall bear its own costs. 

 August 22, 2023

 Date

FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Jarrett B. Perlow

 Jarrett B. Perlow

 Clerk of Court

Case: 23-1734 Document: 8 Page: 2 Filed: 08/22/2023
Editorial Note on Part 184
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 184 appear at 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; and 81 FR 49897, July 29, 2016.

§ 184.1386 Isopropyl citrate. ( a ) Isopropyl citrate is a mixture of the mono-, di-, and triisopropyl esters of citric acid. It is prepared by esterifying citric acid with isopropanol.
( b ) The ingredient must be of a purity suitable for its intended use.
( c ) In accordance with § 184.1(b)(1), the ingredient is used in food with no limitation other than current good manufacturing practice. The affirmation of this ingredient as generally recognized as safe (GRAS) as a direct human food ingredient is based upon the following current good manufacturing practice conditions of use: ( 1 ) The ingredient is used as an antioxidant as defined in § 170.3(o)(3) of this chapter; a sequestrant as defined in § 170.3(o)(26) of this chapter; and a solvent and vehicle as defined in § 170.3(o)(27) of this chapter.
( 2 ) The ingredient is used in margarine in accordance with § 166.110 of this chapter; in nonalcoholic beverages as defined in § 170.3(n)(3) of this chapter; and in fats and oils as defined in § 170.3(n)(12) of this chapter at levels not to exceed current good manufacturing practice.
( d ) Prior sanctions for this ingredient different from the uses established in this section, or different from those set forth in part 181 of this chapter, do not exist or have been waived.
[59 FR 63896, Dec. 12, 1994, as amended at 73 FR 8607, Feb. 14, 2008]
```

                                                SUBSIDIARIES

DOMESTIC SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY:
-------------------------------------

NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                                                    STATE OF INCORPORATION
------------------                                                    ----------------------

PCT International Holdings, Inc.                                      Delaware
Flavors Holdings, Inc.                                                Delaware
Mafco Worldwide Corporation                                           Delaware
Mafco Shanghai Corporation                                            Delaware
EVD Holdings Inc.                                                     Delaware
Pneumo Abex, LLC                                                      Delaware
Jensen Kelly Corporation                                              Delaware
Concord Pacific Corporation (50% owned)                               Maine
Pneumo Abex Lessee Corp.                                              Delaware
Clarke American Corp.                                                 Delaware
Core Skills Inc.                                                      Delaware
Clarke American Checks, Inc.                                          Delaware
Checks in the Mail, Inc.                                              Delaware
B(2)Direct, Inc.                                                      Delaware

FOREIGN SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY:
------------------------------------

NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                                                    JURISDICTION
------------------                                                    ------------
EVD Holdings S.A.S.                                                   France
Extraits Vegetaux Et Derives, S.A.S.                                  France
Wei Feng Enterprises Ltd. (50% owned)                                 British Virgin Islands
Xianyang Concord Natural Products Co. Ltd. (50% owned)                People's Republic of China
Zhangjiagang Free Trade Zone MAFCO Liantai Biotech Co., Ltd. (50%     People's Republic of China
         owned)
Mafco Weihai Green Industry of Science and Technology Co. Ltd. (40%   People's Republic of China
         owned)
```
§ 182.1745 Sodium carboxymethylcellulose. ( a ) *Product.* Sodium carboxymethylcellulose is the sodium salt of carboxymethylcellulose not less than 99.5 percent on a dry-weight basis, with maximum substitution of 0.95 carboxymethyl groups per anhydroglucose unit, and with a minimum viscosity of 25 centipoises for 2 percent by weight aqueous solution at 25 °C.
( b ) *Conditions of use.* This substance is generally recognized as safe when used in accordance with good manufacturing practice.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 5.1




                               September 17, 1997



Corixa Corporation
1124 Columbia Street, Suite 200
Seattle, WA  98104

        REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM S-1 (FILE NO. 333-32147)
        -------------------------------------------------------

Ladies and Gentlemen:

        We have examined the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No.
333-32147) (the "Registration Statement") filed by you, Corixa Corporation, with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 25, 1997, and as amended, in
connection with the registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
of shares of your Common Stock (the "Shares"). As your counsel in connection
with this transaction, we have examined the proceedings taken and we are
familiar with the proceedings proposed to be taken by you in connection with the
sale and issuance of the Shares.

        It is our opinion that upon conclusion of the proceedings being taken or
contemplated by us, as your counsel, to be taken prior to the issuance of the
Shares, and upon completion of the proceedings being taken in order to permit
such transactions to be carried out in accordance with the securities laws of
the various states where required, the Shares when issued and sold in the manner
described in the Registration Statement will be legally and validly issued,
fully paid and nonassessable.

        We consent to the use of this opinion as an exhibit to the Registration
Statement and further consent to the use of our name wherever appearing in the
Registration Statement, including the Prospectus constituting a part thereof,
and in any amendment thereto.

                                           Very truly yours,

                                           VENTURE LAW GROUP
                                           A Professional Corporation

                                           /s/  Venture Law Group

WWE