alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

THE LOEWEN GROUP INC.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(NYSE, TSE, ME: LWN)                                                        NEWS

Contact:       Sitrick And Company
               Anita-Marie Hill
               Jennifer Mercer
               (604) 293-6483
               (310) 788-2850

                              FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
         THE LOEWEN GROUP RECEIVES FINAL COURT APPROVAL OF $200 MILLION
                             DIP FINANCING AGREEMENT

                    -----------------------------------------


Vancouver, BC - July 19, 1999 - THE LOEWEN GROUP INC. (NYSE,TSE,ME:LWN)
announced today that it has received final approval from the Bankruptcy Court of
its $200 million debtor-in- possession (DIP) financing led by First Union to
fund the Company's operations during its restructuring process.

"With our final DIP financing in place, and the on going support of our vendors
and our employees, The Loewen Group is now well-positioned to fund its
operations," said Chairman John Lacey. " This allows us to successfully maintain
our relationship with our customers and suppliers and to strengthen Loewen's
abilities going forward."

The Loewen Group filed its Chapter 11 petition in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Delaware in Wilmington and its application for creditor
protection under the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) in the Ontario
Superior Court of Justice on June 1, 1999.

Based in Vancouver, The Loewen Group Inc. owns or operates more than 1100
funeral homes and more than 400 cemeteries across the United States, Canada and
the United Kingdom. The Company employs approximately 13,000 people and derives
90 percent of its revenue from U.S. operations.


                                     - # # #

Safe Harbor: Certain statements contained in this press release, including but
not limited to information regarding the future economic performance and
financial condition of the Company, the plans and objectives of the Company's
management and the Company's assumptions regarding such performance and plans,
are forward-looking in nature. Additional information concerning important
factors that could cause actual results to differ from the forward-looking
information contained in this release is included in the Company's publicly
filed quarterly and annual reports.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7180 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 539
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7180

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 4, 2024

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                           September 25, 2024

               Reported by Mr. Peters, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 80 1st Street in Kingsland, Arkansas, as the ``Kingsland `Johnny 
                          Cash' Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. KINGSLAND ``JOHNNY CASH'' POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 80 1st Street in Kingsland, Arkansas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Kingsland `Johnny Cash' Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Kingsland 
`Johnny Cash' Post Office''.
                                                       Calendar No. 539

118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 7180

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 80 1st Street in Kingsland, Arkansas, as the ``Kingsland `Johnny 
                          Cash' Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 25, 2024

                       Reported without amendment
```
Editorial Note on Part 9
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 9 appear at 82 FR 52825, Nov. 15, 2017.

§ 9.51 Definitions. As used in this subpart: ( a ) *Individual* means a citizen of the United States or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence.
( b ) The term *maintain* includes maintain, collect, use or disseminate.
( c ) *Record* means any item, collection or grouping of information about an individual that is maintained by the NRC, including, but not limited to, his or her education, financial transactions, medical history, employment history or criminal history, and that contains the individual's name, or the identifying number, symbol or other identifying particular assigned to the individual, such as a finger or voice print or a photograph.
( d ) *System manager* means the NRC official responsible for maintaining a system of records.
( e ) *Systems of records* means a group of records under the control of the NRC from which information is retrieved by the name of an individual or by an identifying number, symbol, or other identifying particular assigned to an individual.
( f ) *Statistical record* means a record in a system of records maintained for statistical research or reporting purposes only and not used in whole or in part in making any determination about an identifiable individual, except as provided by the Census Act, 13 U.S.C. 8.
( g ) *Routine use* means, with respect to the disclosure of a record, the use of such record for a purpose which is compatible with the purpose for which it was collected, as described in a notice published in the Federal Register.
#### Gen LIN, Petitioner, v. Alberto GONZALES,1 Respondent.

No. 03-40940-AG.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Nov. 4, 2005.

Ramesh K. Shrestha, New York, New York, for Appellant.

Michael J. Butler, Assistant United States Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (Thomas A. Marino, United States Attorney for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, on the brief), Tallahassee, Florida, for Appellee.

PRESENT: LEVAL, STRAUB, and HALL, Circuit Judges.

1

. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(c)(2), Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales is automatically substituted for former Attorney General John Ashcroft as a respondent in this case.

SUMMARY ORDER

*UPON DUE CONSIDERATION of this petition for review of the Board of Immigration*Appeals (“BIA”) decision, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the decision of the BIA be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.

Gen Lin, through counsel, petitions for review of the BIA decision affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history.

This Court reviews an the BIA’s factual findings under the substantial evidence standard, and as such, “a finding will stand if it is supported by ‘reasonable, substantial, and probative’ evidence in the record when considered as a whole.” *Secaida-Rosales v. INS,*331 F.3d 297, 307 (2d Cir.2003) (quoting *Diallo v. INS,*232 F.3d 279, 287 (2d Cir.2000)). The same standard of review applies to the denial of withholding of removal under the INA and the CAT. *See Melendez v. United States Dep’t of Justice,*926 F.2d 211, 218 (2d Cir.1991).

In this case, the BIA’s eligibility determination was supported by the record as a whole. The BIA correctly pointed out that Lin had presented no evidence sufficient to demonstrate the requisite fear of persecu*105tion based on any of the grounds enumerated in the INA.
§ 1150.17 Penalties. ( a ) Under section 902(4) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 387b), a tobacco product is deemed adulterated if the domestic manufacturer or importer of the tobacco product fails to pay a user fee assessed to such manufacturer or importer by the later of the date the assessment is due, 30 days from the date FDA sent notification of the amount owed, or 30 days after final Agency action on a resolution of any dispute as to the amount of the fee.
( b ) Under section 902(4) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, a tobacco product is deemed adulterated if the domestic manufacturer or importer of the tobacco product fails to report the information required by § 1150.5 to calculate assessments under this part.
( c ) The failure to report the information required by § 1150.5 to calculate assessments under this part is a prohibited act under section 301(e) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
( d ) Information submitted under § 1150.5 is subject to 18 U.S.C. 1001 and other appropriate civil and criminal statutes.
Editorial Note on Part 173
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 173 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; and 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 173.228 Ethyl acetate. Ethyl acetate (CAS Reg. No. 141-78-6) may be safely used in food in accordance with the following conditions: ( a ) The additive meets the specifications of the Food Chemicals Codex, 7th ed. (2010), pp. 343-344, which is incorporated by reference. The Director of the Office of the Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. You may obtain copies from the United States Pharmacopeial Convention, 12601 Twinbrook Pkwy., Rockville, MD 20852 (Internet address *http://www.usp.org*). Copies may be examined at the Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852, 240-402-7500, between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030 or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html .*
( b ) The additive is used in accordance with current good manufacturing practice as a solvent in the decaffeination of coffee and tea.
[47 FR 146, Jan. 5, 1982, as amended at 49 FR 28548, July 13, 1984; 78 FR 71466, Nov. 29, 2013; 88 FR 17722, Mar. 24, 2023]
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 35 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 35

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     December 12, 2018.
Whereas the American Red Cross advocates that improved education and access to 
        automated external defibrillators (AEDs) could save 50,000 lives each 
        year;
Whereas the average response time to a 911 call is 8 to 12 minutes;
Whereas the likelihood of survival is reduced approximately 10 percent for each 
        minute defibrillation is delayed; and
Whereas sudden cardiac arrest is most effectively treated by combining CPR and 
        defibrillation: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that--
            (1) public schools in possession of one or more AEDs should schedule 
        annual AED education for all school personnel, for which staff meetings 
        or in-service days allocated under State law for professional 
        development programs in emergency first aid and cardiopulmonary 
        resuscitation (CPR) may be used;
            (2) such public schools should consider including in such annual AED 
        education instruction on the use of AEDs and information for school 
        personnel relating to the locations of AEDs, the school's response plan, 
        and the members of the school response team;
            (3) each public school in possession of one or more AEDs should 
        conduct an annual CPR and AED drill for school personnel to practice the 
        use of these life-saving measures and to evaluate the school's 
        preparedness in the event of a sudden cardiac arrest; and
            (4) when planning the education and drills, local educational 
        agencies (LEAs) and schools should coordinate with other schools 
        operating education programs, any State-issued recommendations as to the 
        development or usage of appropriate programs, and the American Heart 
        Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency 
        Cardiovascular Care.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


       We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8, (No. 33-38737, No. 33-73044, No. 33-58037, No.
333-33433, and No. 333-34549) and in the Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No.
33-65229) of Bell Industries, Inc. of our report dated February 7, 2003 relating
to the financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in
this Form 10-K.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP


Los Angeles, California
March 27, 2003


                                       38
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Women's Employment in War Industries

              																								United States. Women's Bureau.						"The Employment of and Demand for Women Workers in the Manufacture of Instruments - Aircraft, Optical and Fire-Control, and Surgical and Dental : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 189-4" in *Women's Employment in War Industries : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 189*			(1942).						https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5462/item/539650, accessed on September 25, 2024.	    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
38448.

#### FISHER v. THE STATE.

Townsend, Judge.

1. Error is assigned in the first special ground of the motion for new trial because during the course of the trial the two court bailiffs escorted the jury to a hotel where they Were separated and assigned to and spent the night in separate rooms; each of the bailiffs occupied a separate room with one juryman; both bailiffs went to sleep shortly before midnight, slept several hours, and did not see the remaining ten jurors until they met at breakfast the next morning. The failure of the bailiff to look after the jury at all times and to remain with the jury and awake at all times while they are in his care constitutes such misconduct as to entitle the defendant to a new trial, and this is true even though each juror makes affidavit that no one communicated with, discussed the case with or influenced him in any way. *Blount v. State,*214 Ga. 433 (4) (105 S. E. 2d 304); *Allen v. Smith,*215 Ga. 455 (1) (111 S. E. 2d 70); *Walker v. State,*216 Ga. 15 (2) (114 S. E. 2d 431). This special ground is accordingly meritorious.

Whatever the rule may seem to have been as enunciated by former decisions of this court which were obviously intended to be predicated on older decisions of the Supreme Court, it *506has now clearly been settled by the Supreme Court in *Blount v. State, Allen v. State,*and *Walker v. State,*supra, that when the bailiff fails to supervise and attend the jury at all times in accordance with his duty, the case must be reversed irrespective of whether any harm is shown to have resulted to the defendant by reason thereof or not. In all those cases the same affidavits were filed as a part of the record as appear in this case, tending to show that no harm was done those defendants or this defendant. Counsel for the State contends that the language used in *Blount v. State,*supra: the “failure to do so *in this case*constitutes such misconduct as to entitle the defendant to a new trial” (emphasis added) limits the ruling to the facts of that case. This theory, however, is exploded by the *Allen*and *Walker*cases, supra, citing *Blount v. State*as authority for reversal in those cases also. In none is the decision of the Supreme Court predicated on the closeness of the evidence, or the fact that those cases were capital felonies. Accordingly, this error requires reversal.

Decided September 30, 1960.

*Gordon Knox, Jr., Boss & Boss, A. Bussell Boss, Edwin W. Boss,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. Wade Johnson, Solicitor-General, Will Ed Smith,*contra.

2. The general grounds of the motion for new trial are without merit. The remaining special ground is not passed on as the evidence may not be the same on another trial of the case.

The trial court erred in denying the motion for new trial.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Carlisle and Frankum, JJ., concur. Gardner, P. J., not participating.*
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0249

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

JOHN EVERETT ELLSWORTH FRY,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including June 12, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 2 2024

05/02/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0249
### Diagram of use at sites controlled by others
#### § 905.40 Technical assistance.

Western shall establish a program that provides technical assistance to customers to conduct integrated resource planning, implement applicable IRPs and small customer plans, and otherwise comply with the requirements of these regulations.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 150 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 150

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     February 28, 2017.
    Resolved, That at any time after adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 998) to provide for the establishment of a process for the review of 
rules and sets of rules, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill 
shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the bill 
are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed 
one hour equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member 
of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. After general debate the 
bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. The bill 
shall be considered as read. All points of order against provisions in the bill 
are waived. No amendment to the bill shall be in order except those printed in 
the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each such 
amendment may be offered only in the order printed in the report, may be offered 
only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be 
debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided and controlled by 
the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not 
be subject to a demand for division of the question in the House or in the 
Committee of the Whole. All points of order against such amendments are waived. 
At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall 
rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments as may have been 
adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and 
amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion 
to recommit with or without instructions.
    Sec. 2.  Upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to consider 
in the House the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 83) disapproving the rule submitted 
by the Department of Labor relating to ``Clarification of Employer's Continuing 
Obligation to Make and Maintain an Accurate Record of Each Recordable Injury and 
Illness''. All points of order against consideration of the joint resolution are 
waived. The joint resolution shall be considered as read. All points of order 
against provisions in the joint resolution are waived. The previous question 
shall be considered as ordered on the joint resolution and on any amendment 
thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of 
debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member 
of the Committee on Education and the Workforce; and (2) one motion to recommit.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
[No. 15563-3-III.

Division Three.

November 4, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Jamie L. Michaud, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Spokane County, No. 96-8-00137-2, Richard J. Schroeder, J., entered February 26, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Brown, J., concurred in by Kurtz, J., and Zagelow, J. Pro Tern.
Editorial Note on Part 176
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 176 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; and 70 FR 72074, Dec. 1, 2005.

§ 176.160 Chromium (Cr III) complex of *N*-ethyl-*N*-heptadecylfluoro-octane sulfonyl glycine. The chromium (Cr III) complex of *N-*ethyl *- N -*heptadecylfluoro-octane sulfonyl glycine containing up to 20 percent by weight of the chromium (Cr III) complex of heptadecylfluoro-octane sulfonic acid may be safely used as a component of paper for packaging dry food when used in accordance with the following prescribed conditions. ( a ) The food additive is used as a component of paper in an amount not to exceed 0.5 percent by weight of the paper.
( b ) ( 1 ) The food-contact surface of the paper is overcoated with a polymeric or resinous coating at least 1 ⁄ 3-mil in thickness, that meets the provision of § 176.170; or
( 2 ) The treated paper forms one or more plies of a paper in a multiwall bag and is separated from the food by at least one ply of packaging films or grease-resistant papers which serves as a functional barrier between the food additive and the food. Such packaging films or grease-resistant papers conform with appropriate food additive regulations.
( c ) The labeling of the food additive shall contain adequate directions for its use to insure compliance with the requirements of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section.