alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 944 

Expressing solidarity with and sympathy for the people of Guatemala after 

the June 3, 2018, eruption of the Fuego Volcano. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 14, 2018 

Mrs. TORRES (for herself and Mr. SMITH of New Jersey) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing solidarity with and sympathy for the people of 

Guatemala after the June 3, 2018, eruption of the Fuego 

Volcano. 

Whereas, on Sunday, June 3, 2018, Guatemala’s Fuego Volcano, which borders the Chimaltenago, Esquintla, and 

Sacatepequez Departments, erupted, spewing toxic gas, 

volcanic ash, and rock into the surrounding area; 

Whereas according to Guatemala’s natural disaster commission, CONRED, more than 100 people have died, at least 

197 are missing, more than 12,500 have been evacuated 

from affected areas, and over 4,000 sheltered; 

Whereas, on June 3, 2018, the President of Guatemala, 

Jimmy Morales, declared 3 days of national mourning; 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 944 IH 

Whereas, on June 6, 2018, the United States Embassy in 

Guatemala announced that the United States would provide an initial contribution of $300,000 in humanitarian 

assistance; 

Whereas, on June 7, 2018, six pediatric burn patients arrived 

safely at Shriners Hospital in Galveston, Texas, following 

close coordination between the Department of State, the 

United States Mission in Guatemala, and the Department of Defense, in collaboration with Shriners International and the Guatemalan Government; 

Whereas rains and the persistence of volcanic ash and toxic 

gases have further impeded recovery efforts; 

Whereas Guatemala is a longstanding United States ally and 

important economic partner; 

Whereas there are more than 1,000,000 Guatemalan-Americans living in the United States; and 

Whereas there are as many as 6,500 United States citizens 

living in Guatemala: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) expresses its solidarity with and deepest 

3 sympathy for the people of Guatemala, especially the 

4 victims of the volcano eruption, and their families; 

5 (2) recognizes the efforts of Guatemalan first 

6 responders and citizen volunteers who have coura7 geously rescued survivors and provided emergency 

8 assistance; 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 944 IH 

1 (3) recognizes the voluntary donations made by 

2 United States citizens, companies, and charities to 

3 relief and reconstruction efforts; 

4 (4) urges the United States Agency for Inter5 national Development and other relevant United 

6 States agencies to continue to provide relief and re7 construction assistance, using local procurement to 

8 the greatest extent possible. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 250 (Thursday, December 30, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 82396-82397]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-33038]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notice

TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m., Thursday, January 13, 2011.

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, 9th Floor, 601 New Jersey 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Commission will hear oral argument in the 
matter Secretary of Labor v. Ames Construction, Inc., Docket No. WEST 
2009-693-M. (Issues include whether a non-production operator may be 
strictly liable for a violation occurring in an area which the operator 
allegedly controls or supervises.)
    Any person attending this oral argument who requires special 
accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 
interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. 
Subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean Ellen, (202) 434-9950/(202) 
708-

[[Page 82397]]

9300 for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

Jean H. Ellen,
Chief Docket Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2010-33038 Filed 12-28-10; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6735-01-P
§ 1305.24 Central processing of orders. ( a ) A supplier that has one or more registered locations and maintains a central processing computer system in which orders are stored may have one or more of the supplier's registered locations fill an electronic order if the supplier does the following: ( 1 ) Assigns each item on the order to a specific registered location for filling.
( 2 ) Creates a record linked to the central file noting both which items a location filled and the location identity.
( 3 ) Ensures that no item is filled by more than one location.
( 4 ) Maintains the original order with all linked records on the central computer system.
( b ) A company that has central processing of orders must assign responsibility for filling parts of orders only to registered locations that the company owns and operates.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Farm Credit Administration

# AGENCY:

Farm Credit Administration.

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3)), that the February 11, 2010 regular meeting (75 FR 6393, February 9, 2010) of the Farm Credit Administration Board (Board) has been rescheduled due to the recent inclement weather in the Washington DC metropolitan area.

# Date and Time: 

The regular meeting of the Board will now be held at the offices of the Farm Credit Administration in McLean, Virginia, on February 24, 2010, from 9 a.m. until such time as the Board concludes its business.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Roland E. Smith, Secretary to the Farm Credit Administration Board, (703) 883-4009, TTY (703) 883-4056.

# ADDRESSES:

Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102-5090.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This meeting of the Board will be open to the public (limited space available). In order to increase the accessibility to Board meetings, persons requiring assistance should make arrangements in advance. Two of the three agenda items have been removed for this rescheduled meeting. The matter to be considered at the meeting is:

## Open Session

    - Approval of Minutes

○ January 14, 2010

                        Dated:                        *February 16, 2010.*

Roland E. Smith,

*Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board*.                    

[FR Doc. 2010-3356 Filed 2-17-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
[No. 39282-4-I.

Division One.

November 3, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Eugene C. Hillius, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 95-1-01844-5, David F. Hulbert, J., entered September 3, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
#### Phillip Westel SEDGWICK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 05-5119.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Oct. 5, 2005.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 4, 2005.

Before NEWMAN, MAYER, and DYK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Phillip Westel Sedgwick appeals the order of the United States Court of Federal Claims dismissing his complaint for lack of jurisdiction. *Sedgwick v. United States,*No. 04-CV-01378 (Fed.Cl. Mar. 30, 2005). Sedgwick sought jurisdiction under the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1491, based on his assertion that the license he was granted by the United States, which permitted him to enter into contracts with Vietnam or Vietnamese nationals under 31 C.F.R. § 500.574, also constituted an executory contract between himself and the United States. Nothing in the regulation suggests that a license to do business with Vietnam also constitutes a contract with the United States. *See*31 C.F.R. § 500.574. Furthermore, none of the elements necessary to form a contract were present. Therefore, there was no contract between Sedgwick and the United States, and the Court of Federal Claims properly dismissed Sedgwick’s claim for lack of jurisdiction. Accordingly, we *affirm.*
To: File 

From: Elizabeth Kohl, DOE GC-71 

Date: June 25, 2009 

Re: Ex parte discussion on rare earth phosphors 

On April 1, 2009, Mahima Gupta and Robert Carmichael of Navigant Consulting spoke 

via phone with Steve Deutsch, Operational Marketing & Business Development Manager 

Rhodia Silcea NA. Ms. Gupta and Mr. Carmichael asked Mr. Deutsch about the supply 

of rare earth phosphors as it relates to the final rule for general service fluorescent and 

incandescent reflector lamps. 

Mr. Deutsch said currently there is a balanced supply chain for rare earth phosphors in 

the United States and the European Union. There is the potential for a shortage in rare 

earths in 20-30 years, assuming China keeps its current policies. Concerns of any near 

term shortages would probably involve terbium, but long term shortage concerns may 

involve high-grade yttrium. Mr. Deutsch said there may be other sources of rare earth 

phosphors coming online in Australia, Canada, etc., although the rare earth phosphor 

content from these sources is probably not as good. 

Mr. Deutsch said Rhodia is currently building up their reclamation capacity. The 

recycled triphosphor is degraded, but Rhodia distills it down to original elements and 

then ‘recreates’ it, so there is not a loss of efficiency. The current supply chain looks like 

this: 95% of rare earth phosphors are mined in China; about 100 or so companies do the 

initial processing in China, distilling the mined material down to individual phosphors. 

Then those phosphors are shipped to a maybe five firms to be mixed and manufactured 

into triphosphor. 

Mr. Deutsch indicated that down the road, a shortage of terbium could occur because of 

its use in magnets. With the surge in hybrid cars a couple years ago, Rhodia saw a spike 

in the price of terbium. Rhodia expects a doubling of triphosphor demand in Western 

countries for linear fluorescent lamps in next five to six years (in the base case), and a 4-

fold increase in CFL triphosphor demand. Mr. Deutsch’s estimate of 20-30 years, as 

stated above, incorporates these increases. There is a standard of proven reserves for 

Western countries, but China is a guessing game. 

End of conversation. 

EE-2006-STD-0131 COMMENT 93
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Capitala Finance Corp. (the Company) for the annual period ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen A. Arnall, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1.

          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 2.

          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: March 7, 2017 /s/ Stephen A. ArnallStephen A. ArnallChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)Capitala Finance Corp.
Exhibit 31.2

        SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, James J. Mastriani, Chief Financial Officer of Velocity Asset Management,
Inc. (the "Company"), do hereby certify that:

         1.       I have reviewed this amended quarterly report on Form 10-QSB
of the Company;

         2.       Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and

         3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Company as of, and for, the period presented in this report.

         4.       The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the Company and have:

                  (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedure, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed, to ensure that material
information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this report is being prepared;

                  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

                  (c) disclosed in this report any changes in the Company's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the company's
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting;
and

         5.       The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the Company's auditors and the audit
committee of the Company's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

                  (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which hare reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and

                  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's
internal control over financial reporting.


                                        /s/ JAMES J. MASTRIANI
                                        -----------------------------------
                                        James J. Mastriani
                                        Chief Financial Officer

August 10, 2005


                                       26
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          15,971
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 193,122
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,841
<BONDS>                                         92,649
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        28,263
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,056
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   193,122
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                44,090
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,935
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,311
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,918
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,487
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,015
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,472
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,472
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
§ 146.152 Orange juice with preservative. ( a ) Orange juice with preservative is the food prepared for further manufacturing use. It complies with the requirements for composition of orange juice for manufacturing as provided for in § 146.151, except that a preservative is added to inhibit spoilage. It may be heat-treated to reduce substantially the enzymatic activity and the number of viable microorganisms.
( b ) The preservatives referred to in paragraph (a) of this section are any safe and suitable preservatives or combinations thereof.
( c ) The name of the food is “Orange juice with preservative”.
( d ) *Label declaration.* Each of the ingredients used in the food shall be declared on the label as required by the applicable sections of parts 101 and 130 of this chapter. In addition, the name of each preservative shall be proceeded by a statement of the percent by weight of the preservative used. If the food is packed in container sizes that are less than 19 liters (5 gallons), the label shall bear a statement indicating that the food is for further manufacturing use only.
( e ) Wherever the name of the food appears on the label so conspicuously as to be easily seen under customary conditions of purchase, the statement specified in paragraph (d) of this section for naming the preservative ingredient used shall immediately and conspicuously precede or follow the name of the food, without intervening written, printed, or graphic matter.
[42 FR 14414, Mar. 15, 1977, as amended at 44 FR 36378, June 22, 1979; 58 FR 2881, Jan. 6, 1993]
Exhibit 32
                   Certification of Periodic Financial Report
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of AMCOL
International Corporation (the "Company") certifies that the quarterly report on
Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2007 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Date:  May 8, 2007                                    /s/ Lawrence E. Washow
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       Lawrence E. Washow
                                                       Chief Executive Officer


Date:  May 8, 2007                                    /s/ Gary L. Castagna
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       Gary L. Castagna
                                                       Chief Financial Officer
###### Editorial Note on Part 180

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 180 appear at 79 FR 75879, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 180.815 How may I contest a proposed debarment?

If you as a respondent wish to contest a proposed debarment, you or your representative must provide the debarring official with information in opposition to the proposed debarment. You may do this orally or in writing, but any information provided orally that you consider important must also be submitted in writing for the official record.
§ 111.95 Under this subpart E, what records must you make and keep? ( a ) You must make and keep records required under this subpart E in accordance with subpart P of this part.
( b ) Under this subpart E, you must make and keep the following records: ( 1 ) The specifications established;
( 2 ) Documentation of your qualification of a supplier for the purpose of relying on the supplier's certificate of analysis;
( 3 ) Documentation for why meeting in-process specifications, in combination with meeting component specifications, helps ensure that the dietary supplement meets the specifications for identity, purity, strength, and composition; and for limits on those types of contamination that may adulterate or may lead to adulteration of the finished batch of the dietary supplement; and
( 4 ) Documentation for why the results of appropriate tests or examinations for the product specifications selected under § 111.75(c)(1) ensure that the dietary supplement meets all product specifications;
( 5 ) Documentation for why any component and in-process testing, examination, or monitoring, and any other information, will ensure that a product specification that is exempted under § 111.75(d) is met without verification through periodic testing of the finished batch, including documentation that the selected specifications tested or examined under § 111.75 (c)(1) are not able to verify that the production and process control system is producing a dietary supplement that meets the exempted product specification and there is no scientifically valid method for testing or examining such exempted product specification at the finished batch stage.
( 6 ) Documentation of FDA's response to a petition submitted under § 111.75(a)(1)(ii) providing for an exemption from the provisions of § 111.75(a)(1)(i).
[72 FR 34942, June 25, 2007, as amended at 72 FR 34968, June 25, 2007]