alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7133 

To authorize use of amounts from emergency solutions grants under the 

McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act to provide safe overnight parking facilities for homeless persons, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 30, 2024 

Mr. CARBAJAL (for himself, Mr. LAMALFA, Mr. VARGAS, and Mr. VALADAO) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To authorize use of amounts from emergency solutions 

grants under the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance 

Act to provide safe overnight parking facilities for homeless persons, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Naomi Schwartz and 

5 Susan Rose Safe Parking Act of 2024’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7133 IH

1 SEC. 2. SAFE PARKING AS ELIGIBLE ACTIVITY UNDER 

2 EMERGENCY SOLUTIONS GRANT PROGRAM. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of section 415 of 

4 the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 

5 11374(a)) is amended— 

6 (1) by redesignating paragraphs (4) and (5) as 

7 paragraphs (5) and (6), respectively; and 

8 (2) by inserting after paragraph (3) the fol9 lowing new paragraph: 

10 ‘‘(4) Maintenance, operation, insurance, and 

11 provision of utilities related to safe parking.’’. 

12 (b) DEFINITION.—Section 401 of the McKinney13 Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11360) is 

14 amended— 

15 (1) by redesignating paragraphs (24) through 

16 (35) as paragraphs (25) through (36), respectively; 

17 and 

18 (2) by inserting after paragraph (23) the fol19 lowing new paragraph: 

20 ‘‘(24) The term ‘safe parking’ means an activity 

21 that— 

22 ‘‘(A) provides homeless persons living in 

23 vehicles, including motor homes, with a safe 

24 place to park their vehicles overnight to facili25 tate a transition to more stable housing; and 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7133 IH

1 ‘‘(B) provides re-housing and supportive 

2 services to such homeless persons.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-09-00737-CV

Ex Parte Walter Lee Hall, Jr.

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 261ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GV-09-002035, HONORABLE SUZANNE COVINGTON, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Walter Lee Hall, Jr., filed his notice of appeal on December 23, 2009. On

May 18, 2010, we sent Hall a notice that his brief was overdue. On June 14, 2010, Hall filed a

motion for extension of time to file his brief. This Court granted his motion on June 23, 2010, and

informed Hall that his brief was due by July 2, 2010. Further, this Court warned Hall that if he failed

to file his brief by that deadline, his appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. To date,

Hall has not filed a further motion to extend or a brief in this case. For that reason, we dismiss this

appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). 

__________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Puryear and Pemberton

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: August 3, 2010
Exhibit32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the QuarterlyReport of Hutton Investors Futures Fund L.P. II (the‘‘Partnership’’) on Form 10-Q for the periodending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’),I, Jennifer Magro, Chief Financial Officer and Director of CitigroupManaged Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Partnership.

/s/Jennifer Magro

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

JenniferMagroCitigroup Managed Futures LLC Chief Financial Officerand Director

Date: November 14,2006

----
<PAGE>   1

THE LOEWEN GROUP INC.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(NYSE, TSE, ME: LWN)
NEWS

Contact:       Sitrick and Company
               Michael Kolbenschlag
               Linda Press
               (310) 788-2850

                              FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

                   THE LOEWEN GROUP REPORTS DIP WAIVERS EXPIRE

  Sufficient Cash Resources Exist to Satisfy Near-Term Obligations and Continue
                                   Operations

                     --------------------------------------

VANCOUVER, BC- November 16, 1999 - THE LOEWEN GROUP INC. (NYSE, TSE, ME: LWN),
one of the largest funeral home and cemetery operators in North America, today
announced that its current waivers for non-compliance with certain financial
covenants in its $200 million debtors-in- possession ("DIP") financing have
expired. As previously announced, the Company is currently proceeding with the
cooperation of its DIP lenders to reset the covenants of the DIP facility in
line with its current business results. It is anticipated that the new covenants
would be effective through the first quarter of 2000.

As at November 15, 1999, the borrowings under the DIP facility were $10.0
million and the letters of credit outstanding were $17.3 million. Although the
Company can not currently borrow under the DIP Facility until the amendment is
obtained, the Company currently believes that sufficient cash resources exist to
satisfy its near-term obligations and does not anticipate any interruption in
its operations.

Based in Vancouver, The Loewen Group Inc. owns or operates more than 1,100
funeral homes and more than 400 cemeteries across the United States, Canada, and
the United Kingdom. The Company employs approximately 13,000 people and derives
approximately 90 percent of its revenue from its US operations.

                                            # # #

Safe Harbor: Certain statements contained in this press release, including but
not limited to information regarding the future economic performance and
financial condition of the Company, the plans and objectives of the Company's
management and the Company's assumptions regarding such performance and plans,
are forward-looking in nature. Additional information concerning important
factors that could cause actual results to differ from the forward-looking
information contained in this release is included in the Company's publicly
filed quarterly and annual reports.
Swanson, Brian (OST) 'PCTT- gS P 2W 0 "(yh'^3 

From: alohi128@aol.com '';i11 iVitN f (JF 

Sent: Friday, January 06, 2012 1:40 AM ' -SPORTAT'ONTo: Devany, Dennis (OST); EAS (OST) i":^ OPERATION'" 

Subject: Answer to Pacific Wings'Petition for Reconsideration "^ ''"' 

m .;AN^S P f:3 0 

Aloha; 

As a resident of Kalaupapa for the past seven years, I am in opposition to the petition 

for reconsideration that was filed by Pacific Wings, LLC. 

I anfi enormously happy with the service and professionalism that is currently being 

supplied by Schuman Aviation Company, Ltd. (Makani Kai Air Charters) at Kalaupapa, HI. 

Sincerely 

Jane "Claire" Cappelle
exv10w1



 








EXHIBIT 10.1




Amendment to Ethanol Marketing Agreement




Effective Date: June 18, 2006




     VeraSun Aurora Corporation, formerly known as VeraSun Energy Corporation (“VeraSun Aurora"),
and Aventine Renewable Energy (“AREI”) are parties to that certain Ethanol Marketing Agreement
dated as of October 14, 2002, as amended as of December 8, 2003 and February 22, 2005 (the
“Agreement”). The parties have discussed certain amendments to the Agreement as set forth below.



     Accordingly, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein and in the
Agreement, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is
hereby acknowledged, VeraSun Aurora and AREI agree as follows:


1. Section 5 of the Agreement is hereby amended to include the following paragraph J:





	 	J.	 	Unit Trains. In addition to any other payments due to VeraSun
Aurora under this Agreement, AREI shall pay VeraSun Aurora $(**) per gallon of
ethanol purchased from VeraSun Aurora and shipped by means of a Unit Train to a
Unit Train Receiving Facility. The payment cycle for Unit Train shipments
shall begin at the time the relevant Unit Train has been loaded and is ready to
be moved from VeraSun Aurora’s facility. For purposes of this paragraph J, a
“Unit Train” shall mean any train assembled at VeraSun Aurora consisting of a
minimum of 60 ethanol cars destined to be offloaded at a Unit Train Receiving
Facility, and a “Unit Train Receiving Facility” shall mean any destination that
receives Unit Trains for the purposes of offloading ethanol.




2. Except as provided above, all other terms of the Agreement, as amended, shall remain in full
force and effect until its termination on March 31, 2007.




     The parties have executed this Amendment to the Agreement effective as of date indicated
above.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	VeraSun Aurora Corporation	 	Aventine Renewable Energy
	One VeraSun Place	 	P.O. Box 10
	Aurora, SD 57002	 	Pekin, IL 61555
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ William L. Honnef
	 	By:
	 	/s/ John R. Gray
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	Title:

	 	SVP Sales and Marketing
	 	Title:
	 	VP Logistics & Development
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	Date:

	 	June 19, 2006
	 	Date:
	 	June 26, 2006
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 







 




			
	1)	 	This confidential information has been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment.
	 
	2)	 	The material has been filed separately with the SEC.
Chemical Security Analysis Center

Chemical Threat Clustering Tool

POWERFUL CLUSTERING TOOL PROVIDES 

EASY TO USE ANALYSIS FOR THREAT 

CHEMICALS

The sheer number of toxic chemicals that could be used by 

terrorists prohibits a comprehensive, detailed analysis of each 

possible threat agent. The Chemical Threat Clustering Tool 

provides an efficient means of analyzing the exhaustive body 

of possible threats by identifying representative chemical 

exemplars for use in threat assessments. This tool uses a 

technically defensible, consistent, and repeatable process for 

determining how many exemplar threat chemicals are required 

to represent the exhaustive body of possible threats.

FOCUS ASSESSMENTS ON ONLY 

THE CHEMICALS NECESSARY TO 

CHARACTERIZE THE THREAT

The Clustering Tool answers the key questions: 

 How many chemicals should be explicitly considered to 

assess threat?

 Which cluster of threat chemicals represents a particular 

chemical of interest?

 How does threat clustering change if there are new data 

about a chemical or if there are changes to chemical 

industry practices?

The Chemical Threat Clustering Tool Home Page 

The Chemical Threat Clustering Tool provides the user with 

the capability to apply one of six clustering algorithms (KMeans, Gaussian Mixture Model, Mean Shift, Agglomerative 

Hierarchical, Fuzzy C-Means, or ordering points to identify the 

clustering structure [OPTICS]) using one of three dataset 

transformations (range scaling, variance scaling, or principal 

component analysis) to any user-specified data set. The 

Clustering Tool allows the user to parse data by characteristics 

to find commonalities and prioritize the data. It reduces large 

sets of data into simplified visual formats that help decision 

making on relevance and data significance.

Results can be viewed interactively in a variety of 2-D and 3-D 

formats, including scatter plots, Sploms, Sankey charts, pie 

charts, and bar charts. Results can also be exported into a 

Microsoft Excel® format for subsequent analysis and reporting.

Three projected clusters determined by the Chemical Threat

Clustering Tool based on chemical properties.

FLEXIBLE TO ADAPT TO OTHER 

CLUSTERING NEEDS

The Chemical Threat Clustering Tool is flexible. The Tool can 

be applied to any user-specified data set, such as potential 

targets, terrorist organizations, or other determinants.

INDUSTRY PARTNER

The Chemical Threat Clustering Tool is owned by the 

Department of Homeland Security Science and Technology 

Directorate and Battelle Memorial Institute is the performer for 

this task. 

Contact Us: csacinfo@st.dhs.gov scitech.dhs.gov

12-2020
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned, Stephen I. Sadove, Chief Executive Officer of Saks Incorporated (the Company), has executed this certification in connection
with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 1, 2010 (the Report).

The undersigned hereby certifies that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 2nd day of June, 2010.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Stephen I. Sadove  
|Stephen I. Sadove      
|Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Saks Incorporated and will be retained by Saks Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 801.1100 General.

Field facility directors are authorized to order a limited denial of participation affecting any participant or contractor and its affiliates except lenders and manufactured home manufacturers. In each case, even if the offense or violation is of a criminal, fraudulent or other serious nature, the decision to order a limited denial of participation shall be discretionary and in the best interests of the Government.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE M&F
WORLDWIDE CORP. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF INCOME AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<NAME>                             M&F WORLD WIDE CORP.
<CIK>                              0000945235
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
<CURRENCY> USD
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                               1
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       10
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                         50
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    63
<PP&E>                                              32
<DEPRECIATION>                                     (5)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     322
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               20
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               20
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         223
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       322
<SALES>                                            100
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   100
<CGS>                                               52
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       52
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    13
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   4
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     31
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (9)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 40
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        40
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.71
        




</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 30, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-40091 

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ALEJANDRO FELIX RODRIGUEZ-PECINA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(5:04-CR-1492-ALL)

--------------------

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Defendant-Appellant Alejandro Felix Rodriguez-Pecina

(“Rodriguez-Pecina”) appeals his conviction and sentence for

illegal reentry after a previous deportation. Rodriguez-Pecina

argues that the district court reversibly erred under United States

v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005), by sentencing him pursuant to a

mandatory application of the sentencing guidelines. 

There was no “Booker” error or Sixth Amendment violation

because the only enhancement to Rodriguez-Pecina’s sentence was for
2

his prior conviction. See Booker, 125 S. Ct. at 756, 769.

Nevertheless, the district court committed “Fanfan” error by

sentencing Rodriguez-Pecina pursuant to a mandatory guidelines

system. See United States v. Walters, 418 F.3d 461, 463-64 (5th

Cir. 2005). A Fanfan error is not structural error. See United

States v. Martinez-Lugo, 411 F.3d 597, 601 (5th Cir.), cert.

denied, 126 S. Ct. 464 (2005). The government concedes that

Rodriguez-Pecina preserved his Fanfan claim, so we review the claim

for harmless error. See Walters, 418 F.3d at 464. There is no

indication in the record that the district court would have imposed

the same sentence had the guidelines been advisory rather than

mandatory. Accordingly, we vacate the sentence and remand for

resentencing in accordance with Booker. 

Rodriguez-Pecina also contends that the “felony” and

“aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (b)(2)

are unconstitutional on their face and as applied in his case in

light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). RodriguezPecina’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). Although

Rodriguez-Pecina contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly

decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule

Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi, we have repeatedly rejected

such arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding.

See United States v. Garza-Lopez, 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.),

cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Rodriguez-Pecina properly
3

concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of AlmendarezTorres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it

for further review. Accordingly, Rodriguez-Pecina’s conviction is

AFFIRMED.

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED; CASE REMANDED FOR

RESENTENCING.
[Nos. 21433-4-II; 21434-2-II.

Division Two.

December 12, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Appellant,*v. Melanie J. Tennis, *Respondent.*The State of Washington, *Appellant,*v. Jason C. Johns, *Respondent.*

Appeals from judgments of the Superior Court for Kit-sap County, Nos. 96-1-00865-4; 96-1-00866-2, M. Karlynn Haberly, J., entered November 18 and November 13, 1996. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Hunt, J., concurred in by Bridgewater, A.C.J., and Morgan, J.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 36 (Wednesday, February 24, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 8353]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3514]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION


Waiver of Filing Deadline Due to Adverse Weather Conditions

February 16, 2010.
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Due to adverse weather conditions, the Federal Communications 
Commission closed early on Friday, February 5, and closed for business 
Monday, February 8 through Thursday, February 11, 2010. In recognition 
of the numerous closings and disruptions caused by the weather in the 
Washington, DC area, all paper and electronic filings that were due on 
February 5 through February 12 are now due on February 16, 2010.

DATES: All paper and electronic filings that were due on February 5th 
through February 12th are now due on February 16th.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Geraldine Taylor, (202) 418-0300.

Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary, Federal Communications Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-3514 Filed 2-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE M
Kelly A Magurany <kamagurany@nalco.com> 10/12/2009 03:11 PM To EHPV-Program-Submissions@EPA

cc Christina

_ Franz@americanchemistry.com, Gloria Drayton-Miller/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Sergio Villalobos <svillalobos@nalco.com> bcc Subject NALCO: TEST PLAN/ ROBUST SUMMARY CAS# 40372-66-5

Dear Administrator: Included in the attached is Nalco Company's Standard eHPV Submission for CAS# 40372-66-5, 1,2,4-Butanetricarboxylic acid, 2-phosphono-, sodium salt Title: Test Plan & Robust Summary For PBTC Sodium Salt, CAS# 40372-66-5

Best Regards, Kelly A Magurany, M.Sc. Senior Toxicologst Corporate Quality & Product Registration N alco Compan y 1601 W Diehl Rd N aperville, IL 60563 Ph. 630.305.1452 Fax 630.305.2945 E-mail. kamagurany @ nalco

. com
- HPV Submission CAS# 40372-66-5.pdf
Editorial Note on Part 112
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 112 appear at 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 112.126 What requirements apply to my buildings? ( a ) All of the following requirements apply regarding buildings: ( 1 ) Buildings must be suitable in size, construction, and design to facilitate maintenance and sanitary operations for covered activities to reduce the potential for contamination of covered produce or food contact surfaces with known or reasonably foreseeable hazards. Buildings must: ( i ) Provide sufficient space for placement of equipment and storage of materials;
( ii ) Permit proper precautions to be taken to reduce the potential for contamination of covered produce, food contact surfaces, or packing materials with known or reasonably foreseeable hazards. The potential for contamination must be reduced by effective design including the separation of operations in which contamination is likely to occur, by one or more of the following means: Location, time, partition, enclosed systems, or other effective means; and
( 2 ) You must provide adequate drainage in all areas where normal operations release or discharge water or other liquid waste on the ground or floor of the building.
( b ) You must implement measures to prevent contamination of your covered produce and food contact surfaces in your buildings, as appropriate, considering the potential for such contamination through: ( 1 ) Floors, walls, ceilings, fixtures, ducts, or pipes; and
( 2 ) Drip or condensate.