alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.57


THIS ADDENDUM No. 1 is made this 25th day of April 2017 BETWEEN:



	(1)	
DA PACIFIC MARITIME S.A., of 19th floor, Banco General Tower, Aquilino De La Guardia Street, Marbella, Panama City, Republic of Panama (the "Sellers");








	(2)	
SEANERGY MARITIME HOLDINGS CORP., having its registered office at Trust Company Complex, Ajeltake Road, Ajeltake Island, Majuro MH96960, Republic of the Marshall Islands or its guaranteed nominee (the "Buyers");







WHEREAS:



	(A)	
The Sellers are the registered owners of the DONG-A ARTEMIS currently registered under the flag of Panama with IMO number 9597848 (the "Vessel"); and








	(B)	
The Sellers and Seanergy have entered into a "SALEFORM 2012" Memorandum of Agreement dated 28 March 2017 (together with any and all other addenda thereto referred to as the "Agreement") for the sale of the Vessel by the Sellers to Seanergy or its guaranteed nominee; and








	(C)	
Pursuant to Clause 5 Lines 77 to 79 of the Agreement the Vessel will be delivered:







"...in the Seller-' options between 20th April, 2017 — 30th June 2017 in Sellers option."


".....Vessels actual delivery date not before 5th May 2017"


"Cancelling Date. . . . . . . to be 1st July 2017 in Buyers option."


IT IS NOW THEREFORE MUTUALLY AGREED BETWEEN THE PARTIES AS FOLLOWS:


CLAUSE 5 — TIME AND PLACE OF DELIVERY AND NOTICES


In Clause 5 - Line 77-79 of the Agreement the following amendments are hereby agreed:


Delete "...anchorage in Singapore — Japan range in the Sellers' options between 20th April 2017 — 30th June 2017 in Sellers option." and replace with "...anchorage in Singapore — Japan rang in the Sellers' options between 25"' May, 2017 —17th July 2017 in Sellers' option."


Delete "Vessel's actual delivery date not before 5th May 2017" and replace with "Vessel's actual delivery date not before 25th May 2017"


Delete "Cancelling Date (See Clauses 5(c), 6(a)(i), 6(a)(ii) and 14) to be 1st July 2017 in Buyers' option." and replace with "Cancelling Date (See Clauses 5(c), 6(a)(i), 6(a)(ii) and 14) to 17th July 2017 in Buyers' option."
















Except as provided hereinabove, the terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have caused this Addendum No. 1 to be executed by their duly authorised representatives on the date written above.


	
EXECUTED

	
)

	 
	
By Kyungwon Kang

	
)

	 
	
for and on behalf of

	
)

	/s/Kyungwon Kang
	
DA PACIFIC MARITIME S.A.

	
)

	
Attorney-In-Fact


	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	
EXECUTED

	
)

	 
	
By Stamatios Tsantanis

	
)

	 
	
for and on behalf of

	
)

	/s/Stamatios Tsantanis
	
SEANERGY MARITIME HOLDINGS CORP.

	
)

	
Stamatios Tsantanis






























2
**Exhibit 32.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
     Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the UnitedStates Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Nathan Zommer, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of IXYS Corporation (the “Company”), and Uzi Sasson, Vice President of Finance and ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:
1. The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2005, to which thisCertification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Annual Report”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as amended; and
2. The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
     **In Witness Whereof**, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 29th day of June,2005.              /s/ Nathan Zommer   /s/ Uzi Sasson         Nathan Zommer   Uzi Sasson  Chairman of the Board, President   Vice President of Finance and Chief  and Chief Executive Officer   Financial Officer  
This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing ofIXYS Corporation under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of anygeneral incorporation language contained in such filing.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7177 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7177

To amend title 28, United States Code, to consolidate certain divisions 
                  in the Northern District of Alabama.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 31, 2024

Mr. Strong (for himself, Mr. Aderholt, Mr. Rogers of Alabama, Mr. Moore 
  of Alabama, and Mr. Carl) introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 28, United States Code, to consolidate certain divisions 
                  in the Northern District of Alabama.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONSOLIDATION OF CERTAIN DIVISIONS IN THE NORTHERN DISTRICT 
              OF ALABAMA.

    Section 81(a) of title 28, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking 
        ``seven'' and inserting ``five'';
            (2) in paragraph (1), by striking ``and Lauderdale'' and 
        inserting ``Lauderdale, and Lawerence'';
            (3) in paragraph (2)--
                    (A) by striking ``Lawrence,'';
                    (B) by inserting after ``Madison,'' the following: 
                ``Marshall,''; and
                    (C) by striking ``and Decatur'';
            (4) in paragraph (4), by striking ``Clay, Cleburne,'' and 
        inserting ``Cherokee, Clay, Cleburne, DeKalb, Etowah, Saint 
        Clair,'';
            (5) in paragraph (5), by striking ``Greene, Pickens, 
        Sumter, and Tuscaloosa'' and inserting ``Fayette, Greene, 
        Lamar, Marion, Pickens, Sumter, Tuscaloosa, Walker, and 
        Winston'';
            (6) by striking paragraph (6); and
            (7) by striking paragraph (7).
                                 <all>
```
[No. 21442-3-II.

Division Two.

December 31, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Tina L. Keshtbod, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Lewis County, No. 96-1-00304-7, H. John Hall, J., entered December 10, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Seinfeld, J., concurred in by Morgan and Armstrong, JJ.
**Exhibit
        32**
  **Certification
        of Periodic Financial Report**
 **Pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of AMCOL
      International Corporation (the “Company”) certifies that the quarterly report on
      Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended June 30, 2008 fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act
      of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date: 
                August 8, 2008
            /s/
                Lawrence E. WashowLawrence
                E. Washow
              Chief
                Executive OfficerDate: 
                August 8, 2008
            /s/
                Donald W. PearsonDonald
                W. Pearson
              Chief
                Financial Officer
United States Court of Appeals 

For the Seventh Circuit 

Chicago, Illinois 60604 

 Submitted February 4, 2010∗

 Decided February 9, 2010 

Before

 FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge

 ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge

 TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge 

No. 09-3164 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v.

CORTEZ D. GILLUM, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

Appeal from the United 

States District Court for the 

Central District of Illinois. 

No. 02-30011 

Jeanne E. Scott, Judge. 

Order 

 Cortez Gillum pleaded guilty to a federal crime and was sentenced in 2002. He 

did not appeal or file a timely petition under 28 U.S.C. §2255. But of late he has filed 

multiple motions asking the district court for release. Last year we informed Gillum that 

the district court is not authorized to consider these motions. United States v. Gillum, No. 

08-2348 (7th Cir. Mar. 3, 2009) (nonprecedential disposition). This did not deter Gillum 

from trying again. 

 

∗ This successive appeal has been submitted to the original panel under Operating Procedure 6(b). After 

examining the briefs and the record, we have concluded that oral argument is unnecessary. See Fed. R. 

App. P. 34(a); Cir. R. 34(f). 

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION 

To be cited only in accordance with 

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
No. 09-3164 Page 2 

 His latest motion contends that the district judge lacked subject-matter 

jurisdiction. He appears to believe that this supplies an end around all of the statutes, 

rules, and doctrines that limit post-judgment challenges to criminal convictions. It does 

not. Jurisdictional arguments, like all others, must be presented before the judgment 

becomes final or the time for collateral review expires. Gillum also errs in supposing 

that the Interstate Agreement on Detainers, on which his latest arguments rest, affects 

federal jurisdiction. Every indictment for a federal crime comes within the district 

courts’ subject-matter jurisdiction. 18 U.S.C. §3231; United States v. Martin, 147 F.3d 529 

(7th Cir. 1997). Whether or not the IAD afforded a full or partial defense to the charge 

does not affect the district court’s authority to resolve the dispute (which is what 

“subject-matter jurisdiction” means). 

 Gillum must understand that any further motions in the district court will expose 

him to sanctions, including not only a fine but also an order directing clerks to return 

his motions unfiled, unless the motion makes a bona fide effort to demonstrate that it is 

not only within the scope of 28 U.S.C. §2255 but also timely under the criteria of 

§2255(f)--and that it has been authorized under §2255(h) if any of Gillum’s prior 

motions is deemed to be a collateral attack. See Castro v. United States, 540 U.S. 375 

(2003).
[No. 39957-8-I.

Division One.

December 22, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Paul Tollison, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 96-1-01193-7, Paul D. Hansen, J., entered December 18, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> BD
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-27-1997
<CASH>                                          43,443
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,014,900
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                            395,411
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                           16,324
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                             30,445
<PP&E>                                          52,238
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,567,472
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<PAYABLES>                                   1,069,472
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                            185,865
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                               8,664
<LONG-TERM>                                     26,869
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,098    
<OTHER-SE>                                     273,503
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,567,472
<TRADING-REVENUE>                               37,613
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                            51,075
<COMMISSIONS>                                   77,191
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                    1,732
<FEE-REVENUE>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,719
<COMPENSATION>                                  64,578
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 39,766
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      39,766
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    25,227
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.78
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.78
        

</TABLE>
#### § 111.453 What are the requirements under this subpart for M written procedures?

You must establish and follow written procedures for holding and distributing operations.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 161 (Wednesday, August 20, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 49368]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-19763]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 8830]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Goya: Order and Disorder''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Goya: Order and Disorder,'' imported from 
abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of 
cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Museum of Fine 
Arts Boston, Boston, Massachusetts, from on or about October 12, 2014, 
until on or about January 19, 2015, and at possible additional 
exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national 
interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be 
published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the imported objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202-632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of 
State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: August 13, 2014.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-19763 Filed 8-19-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 50 884 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

− Appellee , v ersus PERFECTO MALDONADO, also known as Fernando Farjardo Solorzano, also known as Perfecto Morales Maldonado, also known as Perfect Maldonado

- Moraks, also known as Pepe Maldonado, also known as Perfecto Maldonado

- Morales , Defendant

− Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas No. 1 :1 8

- CR

- 278

- 1

Before SMITH, WIENER, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *

Perfecto Maldonado appeals the within

- g uideline s sentence of 21 months

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 29, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-50884 Document: 00514894887 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/29/2019No. 18

- 50 884

2 that he received for illegal reentry in violation of 8 U. S.C. § 1326. He chal

lenges t h at sentence as unconstitutional be cause it ex ceeds the statutor y maxi

mum in § 1326(a) and because the conviction used to increase the sentence under § 1326(b)(2) w as not alleged in th e indictment

. Maldonado c oncedes that
t his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez

- Torres v. United States , 523 U.S.
224 , 235, 239 (1998). E .g. , United States v. Wallace , 759 F.3d 486, 497 (5th Cir. 2014); United States v. Pineda

- Arrellano , 492 F.3d 624, 625

- 26 (5th Cir. 2007). H e seeks to preserve the issue for possible Supreme Court review.
The g overnment move s for summar y affirmance or , alternatively, for an extension of time to file its brief. Because the sole issue presented is forec losed, summary aff irmance is appropriate. See Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis , 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969). Accordingly, the g overnment’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, it s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief i s DENIED, and the judgment is AFFIRMED. Case: 18-50884 Document: 00514894887 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/29/2019
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JOSE JORGE GARCIA,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-1368

[November 30, 2017]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Samantha Schosberg 

Feuer, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2010-CF-009508-AXXX-MB.

Jose Jorge Garcia, Madison, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, CIKLIN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                     EXHIBIT 23
                                                                     ----------
                [LETTERHEAD OF COOPERS & LYBRAND APPEARS HERE]




                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
Intimate Brands, Inc. on Form S-8, Registration Nos. 333-1960, 333-04921, 333-
04923 and 333-10215 of our report dated February 24, 1997, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements of Intimate Brands, Inc. and Subsidiaries as
of February 1, 1997, and February 3, 1996, and for the fiscal years ended
February 1, 1997, February 3, 1996, and January 28, 1995, which report is
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



                                                /s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P

                                                COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.



Columbus, Ohio
April 25, 1997
D E P AR T M E N T O F T H E AI R F O R C E

HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE FLIGHT STANDARDS AGENCY (AFFSA)

4 Mar 14

MEMORANDUM FOR HQ FAA/ARM-100

FROM: HQ AFFSA/A3OF (AJW31AF)

 6500 South MacArthur

 Building 4, Room 124

 Oklahoma City, OK 73169

SUBJECT: 14 CFR Exemption 4633 (Regulatory Docket FAA-2002-12189)

1. Title 14 CFR Exemption 4633 was granted to the United States Air Force on 6 Jun 86 and 

was renewed as 4633N on 26 Apr 12. The exemption expires 30 Sep 14. Exemption 4633N

relieves USAF aircraft from the provisions of Section 91.215 (b) and (c). 

2. Under this exemption, the USAF conducts military training flight operations in designated 

airspace above 10,000 feet MSL without operating aircraft transponders, subject to provisions 

established by the FAA. The provisions of 4633, as amended in 4633N, will remain a part of 

this renewal, if approved. The requirement for the USAF to conduct these operations remains 

unchanged. Extension of the exemption is essential for USAF aircrews to accomplish 

transponder-off operations and training. These procedures are critical to continuation training 

for wartime scenarios and training operations. The procedures, affected areas, and operations 

constraints outlined in Exemption 4633 (as amended in 2006) have provided invaluable training 

to USAF aircrews. We hereby request an extension IAW Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, 

Part 11. 

2. As operations under this exemption have been safely conducted for the past twenty-eight

years, the Air Force requests your consideration in approving the renewal of this exemption

through 30 Sep 16. Please contact me with any questions at (405) 734-8424 or e-mail: 

hqaffsa.a3of@us.af.mil.

Eric D. Meyn, Lt Col, USAF

Chief, Flight Standards Division (IMA)
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7254 

To direct the Administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid to 

clarify that fully implanted active middle ear hearing devices are prosthetics and are not subject to the hearing aid coverage exclusion under 

the Medicare program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 6, 2024 

Mrs. FISCHBACH (for herself, Ms. CRAIG, Mr. EMMER, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Mr. 

FINSTAD, Mr. PHILLIPS, and Mr. STAUBER) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in 

addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To direct the Administrator of the Centers for Medicare 

and Medicaid to clarify that fully implanted active middle 

ear hearing devices are prosthetics and are not subject 

to the hearing aid coverage exclusion under the Medicare 

program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hearing Device Cov5 erage Clarification Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 7254 IH

1 SEC. 2. ACTIVE MIDDLE EAR IMPLANT COVERAGE. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 60 days after the 

3 date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the 

4 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services shall clarify that 

5 fully implanted active middle ear hearing devices are pros6 thetics that are not subject to the hearing aid coverage 

7 exclusion under section 1862(a)(7) of the Social Security 

8 Act (42 U.S.C. 1395y(a)(7)). 

9 (b) PROSTHETIC DEFINED.—The term ‘‘prosthetic’’ 

10 has the meaning given such term in section 414.202 of 

11 title 42, Code of Federal Regulations. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB