alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.2


             REPORT ON SCHEDULE AND CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR

The Board of Directors
Innova Corporation

The audits referred to in our report dated April 30, 1997, except as to Note
17, which is as of June 17, 1997, included the related financial statement
schedule as of December 31, 1996, and for each of years in the two-year period
ended March 31, 1996 and or the nine months ended December 31, 1996, included
in the registration statement.  This financial statement schedule is the
responsibility of the Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on the financial statement schedule based on our audits.  In our
opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the
basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly in all
material respects the information set forth therein.

We consent to the use of our reports included herein and to the reference to
our firm under the headings "Experts" and "Selected Financial Data" in the
prospectus.


/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
-------------------------

Seattle, Washington
August 4, 1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This shcedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Pension  Partners  1992-B,  Ltd.'s  balance  sheet and  statement of  operations
contained  in its Form 10-Q for the  quarter  ended  September  30,  1997 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         35,125
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  170,382
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               212,293
<PP&E>                                         5,604,237
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,242,359)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,574,171
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          6,534
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,567,637
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,574,171
<SALES>                                        448,507
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               451,963
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  211,606<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                166,006
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            166,006
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   166,006
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
### Geology and water resources of the Santa Fe area, New Mexico

By: Zane SpiegelBrewster Baldwin

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1525

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 7**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6608
DAVID J. GUILFOYLE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.
No. 98-6609
DAVID J. GUILFOYLE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-96-1237-2, CA-96-1238-2)2 Submitted: August 18, 1998 Decided: September 1, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David J. Guilfoyle, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. Anderson, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying relief on his petitions filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the records and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistratejudge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeals on the reasoning of the district court. Guilfoyle v. Angelone , Nos. CA-96-1237-2; CA-96-1238-2 (E.D. Va. Apr. 13, 1998). We grant Guilfoyle’s motion to incorporate his brief filed in No. 98-6609, to No. 98-6608. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
MEMORANDUM

TO: Record 

FROM: James K. O’Connell, ERG

Sarah Yates, ERG

DATE: February 18, 2016

SUBJECT: Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (WY OGCC) Water Data 

Memorandum (DCN SGE01244)

In September 2015, EPA reached out to the Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation 

Commission (WY OGCC) to request the full, underlying data set behind the “Water Analysis” 

data that is available by searching on their website at 

(http://wogcc.state.wy.us/warchoiceMenu.cfm). WY OGCC provided the requested data, and it 

was used to support the Unconventional Oil and Gas (UOG) Produced Water Volumes and 

Characterization Data Compilation memorandum (DCN SGE01184) that was developed in 

support of the Technical Development Document for Effluent Limitations Guidelines and 

Standards for Oil and Gas Extraction. The full, underlying data set is included as Attachment 1 

to this memorandum (DCN SGE01244.A01).

EPA and ERG communicated with WY OGCC to obtain the units of measure for the 

various parameters included in the data set. WY OGCC was not able to identify the units for all 

of the reported parameters. As noted in Table 1, ERG excluded parameters for which units could 

not be identified from the produced water characterization analysis described in the UOG 

Produced Water Volumes and Characterization Data Compilation memorandum (DCN 

SGE01184). Table 1 shows the list of parameters in the WY OGCC full, underlying data set in

Attachment 1 (DCN SGE01244.A01) and notes whether or not each parameter from the WY 

OGCC data was included in ERG’s analysis.

Table 1. List of Parameters

Parameter Name

Included in Analysis?

(Yes/No)

Arsenic No

Barium No

Bicarbonate Yes

Cadmium No

Calcium Yes

Carbonate Yes

Chloride Yes

Chromium No

Hydrogen Sulfide Yes
Memorandum

February 18, 2016

Page 2

Table 1. List of Parameters

Parameter Name

Included in Analysis?

(Yes/No)

Hydroxide Yes

Iron Yes

Lead No

Lithium Yes

Magnesium Yes

Mercury No

NaCl Equivalent Yes

Oil and Grease No

pH Yes

Potassium Yes

Radium No

Selenium No

Silver No

Sodium Yes

Sodium Adsorption Ratio Yes

Sulfate Yes

TDS Yes

Total Anions Yes

Total Cations Yes

Zinc No
### Hydrological information products for the Off-Project Water Program of the Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement

By: Daniel T. SnyderJohn C. Risley**Jonathan V. Haynes**

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20121199

#### Links

- More information:  **USGS Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Metadata:                               - **Metadata**
  - **Metadata**
  - **Metadata**
  - **Metadata**
  - **Metadata**
  - **Metadata**
  - **Metadata**
  - **Metadata** 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
§ 182.1057 Hydrochloric acid. ( a ) *Product.* Hydrochloric acid.
( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) *Limitations, restrictions, or explanation.* This substance is generally recognized as safe when used as a buffer and neutralizing agent in accordance with good manufacturing practice.
# L_2022266DE.01002401.xml

| 13.10.2022 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 266/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.10.2022

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 266/24

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) 2018/1240 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 12. September 2018 über die Einrichtung eines Europäischen Reiseinformations- und -genehmigungssystems (ETIAS) und zur Änderung der Verordnungen (EU) Nr. 1077/2011, (EU) Nr. 515/2014, (EU) 2016/399, (EU) 2016/1624 und (EU) 2017/2226

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 236 vom 19. September 2018
  )

Seite 42, Artikel 45 Absatz 1:

Anstatt:

„(1)   Im Luft- und Seeverkehr tätige Beförderungsunternehmer sowie international tätige Beförderungsunternehmer, die Gruppen von Personen in Autobussen befördern, ...“

muss es heißen:

„(1)   Im Luft- und Seeverkehr tätige Beförderungsunternehmer sowie international tätige Beförderungsunternehmer, die Gruppen von Personen über Land in Autobussen befördern, ...“

Seite 43, Artikel 45 Absatz 9:

Anstatt:

„(9)   Abweichend von Absatz 1 gilt für Beförderungsunternehmer, die Gruppen von Personen in Autobussen befördern, dass in den ersten drei Jahren ...“

muss es heißen:

„(9)   Abweichend von Absatz 1 gilt für Beförderungsunternehmer, die Gruppen von Personen über Land in Autobussen befördern, dass in den ersten drei Jahren ...“

---
EXHIBIT 11.1

                            PARADIGM TECHNOLOGY, INC.

                  COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE(1)
                    (in thousands, except per share amounts)



                                                      Year Ended     Year Ended
                                                     December 31,   December 31,
                                                         1995           1996
                                                     ------------   ------------

Net income (loss) .................................    $  5,263      $(36,425)
                                                       ========      ========

Weighted average shares outstanding:

   Common Stock ...................................       3,784         7,060

   Convertible Preferred Stock ....................       1,600          --

   Common Stock issuable upon exercise of
      options and warrants(2) .....................         930          --
                                                       --------      --------

   Weighted average common shares and
      equivalents .................................       6,314         7,060
                                                       ========      ========

Net income (loss) per share .......................    $   0.83      $  (5.16)
                                                       ========      ========


-------------------


(1)      This  Exhibit  should  be read  with  Note 2 of Notes to the  financial
         statements.
(2)      Stock  options and warrants  granted  subsequent  to May 1994 have been
         included in the calculation of common and common  equivalents shares as
         if they were outstanding for all periods prior to the Company's initial
         public offering of 2,300,000 shares of common stock when closed on July
         5, 1995.
###### Editorial Note on Part 184

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 184 appear at 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; and 81 FR 49897, July 29, 2016.

#### § 184.1343 Locust (carob) bean gum.

(a) Locust (carob) bean gum is primarily the macerated endosperm of the seed of the locust (carob) bean tree, *Ceratonia siliqua* (Linne), a leguminous evergreen tree, with lesser quantities of seed coat and germ.

(b) The ingredient meets the specifications of the “Food Chemicals Codex,” 3d Ed. (1981), pp. 174-175, which is incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the National Academy Press, 2101 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20418, or may be examined at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.*

(c) The ingredient is used at levels not to exceed the following maximum levels:

| Food (as served) | Percent | Function |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Baked goods and baking mixes, § 170.3(n)(1) of this chapter | 0.15 | Stabilizer and thickener, § 170.3(o)(28) of this chapter. |
| Beverages and beverage bases, nonalcoholic, § 170.3(n)(3) of this chapter | .25 | Do. |
| Cheeses, § 170.3(n)(5) of this chapter | .8 | Do. |
| Gelatins, puddings, and fillings, § 170.3(n)(22) of this chapter | .75 | Do. |
| Jams and jellies, commercial, § 170.3(n)(28) of this chapter | .75 | Do. |
| All other food categories | .5 | Do. |

Maximum Usage Levels Permitted

(d) [Reserved]

(e) Prior sanctions for this ingredient different from the uses established in this regulation do not exist or have been waived.

[42 FR 14653, Mar. 15, 1977, as amended at 42 FR 55205, Oct. 14, 1977; 49 FR 5612, Feb. 14, 1984]
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7257 

To reauthorize the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 6, 2024 

Mr. JOYCE of Ohio (for himself, Mr. HUIZENGA, Mrs. DINGELL, Ms. KAPTUR, 

Ms. MOORE of Wisconsin, Mr. BERGMAN, Mr. MOOLENAAR, Ms. 

TENNEY, Mr. STEIL, Ms. STEVENS, Mr. JAMES, Mr. MILLER of Ohio, 

Mr. SCHNEIDER, Mrs. MCCLAIN, Ms. SLOTKIN, Mr. KRISHNAMOORTHI, 

Mr. MORELLE, Mr. QUIGLEY, and Mr. WALBERG) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 

Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Great Lakes Restora5 tion Initiative Act of 2024’’ or the ‘‘GLRI Act of 2024’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 7257 IH

1 SEC. 2. GREAT LAKES RESTORATION INITIATIVE REAU2 THORIZATION. 

3 Section 118(c)(7)(J)(i) of the Federal Water Pollu4 tion Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1268(c)(7)(J)(i)) is amend5 ed— 

6 (1) in subclause (V), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

7 end; 

8 (2) in subclause (VI), by striking the period at 

9 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

10 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

11 ‘‘(VII) $500,000,000 for each of 

12 fiscal years 2027 through 2031.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
§ 182.3189 Calcium ascorbate. ( a ) *Product.* Calcium ascorbate.
( b ) *Conditions of use.* This substance is generally recognized as safe when used in accordance with good manufacturing practice.
§ 1.691 How do I request reconsideration of a denial by FDA of an application or a waiver request? ( a ) An accreditation body may seek reconsideration of the denial of an application for recognition, renewal of recognition, or reinstatement of recognition no later than 10 business days after the date of the issuance of such denial.
( b ) A third-party certification body may seek reconsideration of the denial of an application for direct accreditation, renewal of direct accreditation, reaccreditation of directly accredited third-party certification body, a request for a waiver of the conflict of interest requirement in § 1.650(b), or a waiver extension no later than 10 business days after the date of the issuance of such denial.
( c ) A request to reconsider an application or waiver request under paragraph (a) or (b) of this section must be signed by the requestor or by an individual authorized to act on its behalf in submitting the request for reconsideration. The request must be submitted electronically in English and must comply with the procedures described in the notice.
( d ) After completing its review and evaluation of the request for reconsideration, FDA will notify the requestor through the issuance of the recognition, direct accreditation, or waiver upon reconsideration or through the issuance of a denial of the application or waiver request under paragraph (a) or (b) of this section upon reconsideration.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF

L.S.,

A CHILD. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 20

- 00187

- CV

Appeal from the

65th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2019DCM5475)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below.

It appearing to this Court that Appellant is indigent for purposes of appeal, this Court makes

no other order with respect thereto. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 4TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2020.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before Rodriguez, J., Palafox, J., and Chew, C.J. (Senior Judge)

Chew, C.J. (Senior Judge), sitting by assignment
425 A.2d 797

#### Joan B. THOMA v. George M. THOMA, Appellant.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued Nov. 15, 1979.

Filed Feb. 6, 1981.

*250Irwin D. Jackson, Pittsburgh, for appellant.

W. Thomas Laffey, Jr., Pittsburgh, for appellee.

Before SPAETH, HOFFMAN and VAN der VOORT, JJ.

VAN der VOORT, Judge:

The parties were married in 1951, and as of relevant times in this action they are still married. Joan Thoma, appellee, filed a complaint for divorce in November of 1974 and asked for alimony and counsel fees. After a hearing, she was awarded on December 18, 1974, alimony pendente lite in the amount of $400 per month and counsel fees in the amount of $200. On October 25, 1978, appellee petitioned the court for enforcement of the order of December 18, 1974 for alimony pendente lite, and after hearing on November 21, 1978, the court directed appellant, Dr. Thoma, to pay all arrearages then due and additional counsel fees. Appellant then filed a petition for cancellation of alimony pendente lite, and appellee filed, on November 27, 1978, a complaint for support. On February 6, 1979, the court below ordered appellant Dr. *251Thoma to pay $500 per month for support of appellee. This support order, at No. 4644 of 1978 (in the lower court), was appealed to our Court on February 23, 1979, at No. 190 April 1979. Appellant’s application for supersedeas of the support order was refused below but granted by us on condition that appellant post a $6,000 supersedeas bond.

After a hearing upon the petition for cancellation of alimony pendente lite or in the alternative to dismiss the divorce action, the court below dismissed the said petition by order dated April 16, 1979. An appeal from this order brings the case before us.

At the hearing to terminate the alimony pendente lite on March 3, 1979, before dismissing appellant’s petition the court below suggested to the parties that they apply to us for a remand of the support case (at No. 190 April 1979) so that the court could consider both the issue of support and the issue of either terminating the alimony pendente lite or of dismissing the divorce action. The appellant refused the court’s suggestion.

When there is an action for divorce as well as one for support, a party may be entitled to alimony pendente lite or to support but may not have both. *Rubin v. Rubin,*230 Pa.Super. 591, 326 A.2d 578 (1974).1

Therefore, the order for alimony pendente lite is terminated, and the supersedeas at No. 190 April 1979 is dissolved. However, the supersedeas bond in the amount of $6,000 shall remain in full force and effect to secure any and all payments that may be decided to be due appellee in either this action, or the action at 190 April 1979, or both.

Order at No. 391 April 1979 vacated. A copy of this Opinion and Order shall be docketed and lodged in the action at No. 190 April 1979.

1

. While in *Rubin*the facts are not identical with the instant case, the principle is established therein that a complainant may not have both alimony pendente lite and support.