alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7228 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7228

    To amend title 17, United States Code, to expand the copyright 
  protection provided to architectural works to golf courses, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 5, 2024

Mr. Fitzpatrick (for himself and Mr. Panetta) introduced the following 
       bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 17, United States Code, to expand the copyright 
  protection provided to architectural works to golf courses, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Bolstering Intellectual Rights 
against Digital Infringement Enhancement Act'' or the ``BIRDIE Act''.

SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF COPYRIGHT PROTECTION PROVIDED TO ARCHITECTURAL 
              WORKS TO GOLF COURSES.

    (a) Design of Golf Courses.--Section 101 of title 17, United States 
Code, is amended in the matter related to the definition of 
``architectural work''--
            (1) by striking ``drawings.'' and inserting ``drawings, and 
        the design of a course on which golf is played (except for any 
        course on which mini golf, or other similar game, is played) as 
        embodied in any tangible medium of expression, including an 
        architectural plan or drawing''; and
            (2) by striking ``features.'' and inserting ``features. In 
        the case of a course on which golf is played, the work also 
        includes any of the following that is part of the course:
                    ``(1) Landscaping.
                    ``(2) An irrigation system.
                    ``(3) A path.
                    ``(4) A golf green.
                    ``(5) A tee.
                    ``(6) A facility in which golf is practiced.
                    ``(7) A bunker.
                    ``(8) A lake.
                    ``(9) A topographic feature.''.
    (b) Application.--This Act, and the amendments made by this Act, 
shall apply to--
            (1) a work created on or after December 1, 1990; and
            (2) a work that was unconstructed and embodied in 
        unpublished plans or drawings on December 1, 1990.
                                 <all>
```
§ 182.2227 Calcium silicate. ( a ) *Product.* Calcium silicate.
( b ) *Tolerance.* 2 percent and 5 percent.
( c ) *Limitations, restrictions, or explanation.* This substance is generally recognized as safe when used at levels not exceeding 2 percent in table salt and 5 percent in baking powder in accordance with good manufacturing practice.
H. Res. 151 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

February 27, 2017. 

Whereas the death of the late Minority Leader of the House 

of Representatives, Robert H. ‘‘Bob’’ Michel, on February 17, 2017, has created not only a personal loss to 

his family, his many colleagues, and friends, but also a 

great loss to the Nation; 

Whereas Bob Michel led a remarkable life, personally blessed 

with four children, eight grandchildren, and two great 

grandchildren; 

Whereas Bob Michel was born and raised in Peoria, Illinois; 

Whereas as a young man, Bob Michel joined the United 

States Army at the height of World War II, landing on 

the beaches of Normandy and fighting across Europe 

through the Battle of the Bulge, earning two Bronze 

Stars, four Battle stars, and the Purple Heart for his 

wounds; 

Whereas Bob Michel returned home from Europe, graduated 

from Bradley University, and embarked on a career in 

public service that would span 44 years; 

Whereas Bob Michel was then elected to Congress, going on 

to serve honorably for 38 years representing Peoria and 

much of Central Illinois with great distinction, and was 

chosen by his colleagues to serve them as House Minority 
2 

•HRES 151 EH 

Whip, and for 14 years as the elected Republican Minority Leader of the House of Representatives; 

Whereas Bob Michel’s formidable legislative skills were invaluable in enacting key initiatives of President Reagan 

and President George H.W. Bush on behalf of the people; 

Whereas Bob Michel will be long remembered by all for his 

strong dedication to responsible public service and his 

love of the people of the United States; 

Whereas Bob Michel conducted himself as a leader with a 

commitment to civil discourse, personal dignity, political 

consensus, and adherence to fundamental human values; 

Whereas Bob Michel’s public service culminated in the award 

of the Nation’s highest civilian honor, the Presidential 

Medal of Freedom; and 

Whereas in the House of Representatives and in his life, Bob 

Michel’s uncommon decency and generosity of spirit were 

evident to all who knew and worked with him: Now, 

therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) honors the life, achievements, and distinguished 

public service of Bob Michel; and 

(2) expresses its condolences to his family on his 

passing. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 29, 2018. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, October 29, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19I0063. IN THE INTEREST OF E. J. B. et al., CHILDREN (MOTHER) .
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 18JV00542 18JV00544 18JV00543
§ 1301.27 Separate registration by retail pharmacies for installation and operation of automated dispensing systems at long term care facilities. ( a ) A retail pharmacy may install and operate automated dispensing systems, as defined in § 1300.01 of this chapter, at long term care facilities, under the requirements of § 1301.17. No person other than a registered retail pharmacy may install and operate an automated dispensing system at a long term care facility.
( b ) Retail pharmacies installing and operating automated dispensing systems at long term care facilities must maintain a separate registration at the location of each long term care facility at which automated dispensing systems are located. If more than one registered retail pharmacy operates automated dispensing systems at the same long term care facility, each retail pharmacy must maintain a registration at the long term care facility.
( c ) A registered retail pharmacy applying for a separate registration to operate an automated dispensing system for the dispensing of controlled substances at a long term care facility is exempt from application fees for any such additional registrations.
[70 FR 25465, May 13, 2005]
§ 1301.35 Certificate of registration; denial of registration. ( a ) The Administrator shall issue a Certificate of Registration (DEA Form 223) to an applicant if the issuance of registration or reregistration is required under the applicable provisions of sections 303 or 1008 of the Act (21 U.S.C. 823 and 958). In the event that the issuance of registration or reregistration is not required, the Administrator shall deny the application. Before denying any application, the Administrator shall issue an order to show cause pursuant to § 1301.37 and, if requested by the applicant, shall hold a hearing on the application pursuant to § 1301.41.
( b ) If in response to a show cause order a hearing is requested by an applicant for registration or reregistration to manufacture in bulk a basic class of controlled substance listed in Schedule I or II, notice that a hearing has been requested shall be published in the Federal Register and shall be mailed simultaneously to the applicant and to all persons to whom notice of the application was mailed. Any person entitled to file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to § 1301.33(a) may participate in the hearing by filing notice of appearance in accordance with § 1301.43. Such persons shall have 30 days to file a notice of appearance after the date of publication of the notice of a request for a hearing in the Federal Register.
( c ) The Certificate of Registration (DEA Form 223) shall contain the name, address, and registration number of the registrant, the activity authorized by the registration, the schedules and/or Administration Controlled Substances Code Number (as set forth in part 1308 of this chapter) of the controlled substances which the registrant is authorized to handle, the amount of fee paid (or exemption), and the expiration date of the registration. The registrant shall maintain the certificate of registration at the registered location in a readily retrievable manner and shall permit inspection of the certificate by any official, agent or employee of the Administration or of any Federal, State, or local agency engaged in enforcement of laws relating to controlled substances.
[62 FR 13954, Mar. 24, 1997]
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7103 

To amend the Small Business Act to require Federal agencies to testify 

and report on scores received under the scorecard program for evaluating 

Federal agency compliance with small business contracting goals, to 

testify for failure to meet Governmentwide contracting goals, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 29, 2024 

Mr. STAUBER (for himself, Mr. MCGARVEY, and Mr. LALOTA) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Small Business 

A BILL 

To amend the Small Business Act to require Federal agencies to testify and report on scores received under the 

scorecard program for evaluating Federal agency compliance with small business contracting goals, to testify 

for failure to meet Governmentwide contracting goals, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Agency Accountability 

5 Act of 2024’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 7103 IH

1 SEC. 2. FEDERAL AGENCY TESTIMONY ON SCORECARD 

2 SCORES AND FAILURE TO ACHIEVE CERTAIN 

3 GOALS. 

4 Section 15(g)(2) of the Small Business Act (15 

5 U.S.C. 644(g)(2)) is amended by adding at the end the 

6 following: 

7 ‘‘(G) TESTIMONY REQUIRED.—The head of the 

8 office established in a Federal agency under sub9 section (k) shall testify before the Committee on 

10 Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate 

11 and the Committee on Small Business of the House 

12 of Representatives under the following cir13 cumstances: 

14 ‘‘(i) If such agency fails to receive a score 

15 equivalent to a letter grade of ‘A’ or above on 

16 the scorecard established under subsection (y) 

17 for a fiscal year, on the reasons for such fail18 ure. 

19 ‘‘(ii) If such agency fails to meet two or 

20 more of the Governmentwide goals established 

21 under paragraph (1)(A), on the reasons for 

22 such failure,’’. 

23 SEC. 3. FEDERAL AGENCY REPORTING ON SCORECARD 

24 SCORES. 

25 Section 15(h)(1)(D) of the Small Business Act (15 

26 U.S.C. 644(h)(1)(D)) is amended by inserting ‘‘and to imVerDate Sep 11 2014 06:49 Jan 31, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H7103.IH H7103

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 7103 IH

1 prove the score on the scorecard established under sub2 section (y)’’ after ‘‘better meet such goals’’. 

3 SEC. 4. COMPLIANCE WITH CUTGO. 

4 No additional amounts are authorized to be appro5 priated to carry out this Act or the amendments made 

6 by this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
```

Exhibit 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 33-99740, Form S-8 No. 33-40365 and Form S-8 No. 333-9162)
pertaining to the Power Control Technologies Inc. 1995 Stock Option Plan, the M
& F Worldwide 1997 Stock Option Plan, and the M & F Worldwide Corp. 2000 Stock
Option Plan of M & F Worldwide Corp. of our reports dated March 8, 2005, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of M & F
Worldwide Corp., M & F Worldwide Corp. management's assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of M & F Worldwide
Corp., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December
31, 2004.

March 8, 2005
New York, New York
```
Editorial Note on Part 184
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 184 appear at 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; and 81 FR 49897, July 29, 2016.

§ 184.1027 Mixed carbohydrase and protease enzyme product. ( a ) Mixed carbohydrase and protease enzyme product is an enzyme preparation that includes carbohydrase and protease activity. It is obtained from the culture filtrate resulting from a pure culture fermentation of a nonpathogenic strain of *B. licheniformis.*
( b ) The ingredient meets the specifications of the Food Chemicals Codex, 3d Ed. (1981), p. 107, which is incorporated by reference. Copies are available from the National Academy Press, 2101 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20418, or available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .*
( c ) In accordance with § 184.1(b)(1), the ingredient is used in food with no limitation other than current good manufacturing practice. The affirmation of this ingredient as generally recognized as safe as a direct human food ingredient is based upon the following current good manufacturing practice conditions of use: ( 1 ) The ingredient is used as an enzyme, as defined in § 170.3(o)(9) of this chapter, to hydrolyze proteins or carbohydrates.
( 2 ) The ingredient is used in the following foods at levels not to exceed current good manufacturing practice: alcoholic beverages, as defined in § 170.3(n)(2) of this chapter, candy, nutritive sweeteners, and protein hydrolyzates.
[48 FR 240, Jan. 4, 1983]
Editorial Note on Part 177
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 177 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 70 FR 72074, Dec. 1, 2005; and 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 177.2910 Ultra-filtration membranes. Ultra-filtration membranes identified in paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2), (a)(3), and (a)(4) of this section may be safely used in the processing of food, under the following prescribed conditions; ( a ) ( 1 ) Ultra-filtration membranes that consist of paper impregnated with cured phenol-formaldehyde resin, which is used as a support and is coated with a vinyl chloride-acrylonitrile copolymer.
( 2 ) Ultra-filtration membranes that consist of a sintered carbon support that is coated with zirconium oxide (CAS Reg. No. 1314-23-4) containing up to 12 percent yttrium oxide (CAS Reg. No. 1314-36-9).
( 3 ) Ultra-filtration membranes that consist of an aluminum oxide support that is coated with zirconium oxide (CAS Reg. No. 1314-23-4) containing up to 5 percent yttrium oxide (CAS Reg. No. 1314-36-9).
( 4 ) Ultrafiltration membranes that consist of a microporous poly(vinylidene fluoride) membrane with a hydrophilic surface modifier consisting of hydroxypropyl acrylate/tetraethylene glycol diacrylate copolymer.
( b ) Any substance employed in the production of ultra-filtration membranes that is the subject of a regulation in parts 174, 175, 176, 177, 178 and § 179.45 of this chapter conforms with the specifications of such regulation.
( c ) Ultra-filtration membranes are used in the physical separation of dissolved or colloidally suspended varying molecular size components of liquids during the commercial processing of bulk quantities of food.
( d ) Ultra-filtration membranes shall be maintained in a sanitary manner in accordance with good manufacturing practice so as to prevent potential microbial adulteration of the food.
( e ) Ultrafiltration membranes identified in paragraph (a)(4) may be used to filter aqueous or acidic foods containing up to 13 percent of alcohol at temperatures not to exceed 21 °C (70 °F).
( f ) To assure safe use of the ultra-filtration membranes, the label or labeling shall include adequate directions for a pre-use treatment, consisting of conditioning and washing with a minimum of 8 gallons of potable water prior to their first use in contact with food.
( g ) Acrylonitrile copolymers identified in this section shall comply with the provisions of § 180.22 of this chapter.
[42 FR 14572, Mar. 15, 1977, as amended at 53 FR 17925, May 19, 1988; 58 FR 48599, Sept. 17, 1993; 60 FR 54426, Oct. 24, 1995]
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**689**
**KA 15-00418**

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., LINDLEY, CURRAN, TROUTMAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOHANNES HIRAM, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (DEBORAH K. JESSEY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

MICHAEL J. FLAHERTY, JR., ACTING DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (MATTHEW B. POWERS OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John L. Michalski, A.J.), entered January 21, 2015. The order determined that defendant is a level two risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order determining that he is a level two risk under the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 et seq. ). Contrary to defendant’s contention, Supreme Court properly assessed 15 points under risk factor 9 for his nonviolent felony criminal history. That assessment is supported by the reliable hearsay contained in the case summary ( see People v Thompson , 66 AD3d 1455, 1456, lv denied 13 NY3d 714; People v Ramos

, 41 AD3d 1250, 1250, lv denied 9 NY3d 809; see generally People v Mingo , 12 NY3d 563, 573), and defendant’s criminal history report ( see People v Palmer , 68 AD3d 1364, 1366; People v Mann , 52 AD3d 884, 886), which establish that defendant committed a felony in the State of Texas. “Although given an opportunity to discover and present evidence on the matter . . . defendant adduced nothing in opposition to those materials” ( People v Wroten , 286 AD2d 189, 199, lv denied 97 NY2d 610).

We further conclude that the court properly assessed 10 points under risk factor 12 based on defendant’s failure to accept responsibility. Although defendant pleaded guilty to attempted sexual abuse in the first degree ( see Penal Law §§ 110.00, 130.65 [3]), and stated that he was sorry and “never, never wants this to happen again[,]” he denied that he touched the 10-year-old victim’s vagina and also denied that his actions were motivated by sexual desire. Defendant’s denials, however, are in direct contradiction to his**-2- 689**
**KA 15-00418**

guilty plea of attempted sexual abuse in the first degree ( see §§ 130.00 [3]; 130.65 [3]). Defendant’s “contradictory statements, considered together, do not reflect a ‘genuine acceptance of responsibility’ as required by the risk assessment guidelines developed by the Board [of Examiners of Sex Offenders]” ( People v Noriega , 26 AD3d 767, 767, lv denied 6 NY3d 713 [internal quotation marks omitted]). Finally, defendant’s contention that the People failed to present clear and convincing evidence that he in fact touched the victim’s vagina is raised for the first time on appeal and is thus not preserved for our review ( see People v Smith , 17 AD3d 1045, 1045, lv denied 5 NY3d 705).

Entered: September 30, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
H. Res. 80

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

February 15, 2005.

Whereas every State in the United States has established a

fire chiefs association;

Whereas fire chiefs associations provide comprehensive and

integrated statewide public safety efforts, thereby enhancing the quality of life of American citizens by reducing

the effects of fire, medical, and environmental emergencies;

Whereas all fire chiefs associations serve to provide educational resources to firefighters, facilitate information

exchange and regional cooperation between firefighting

entities, and provide professional development workshops

and training to all statewide and regional firefighters;

Whereas the mission statements of all fire chiefs associations

have continuously broadened beyond the original goals of

working for the promotion of fire prevention and protection from and extinguishment of fires to keep pace with

the new challenges and demands facing the 21st Century,

working in conjunction with the Nation’s efforts in securing the homeland;

Whereas to accommodate the homeland security needs facing

the Nation, the mission statements of fire chiefs associations today include facilitating the exchange of regional
2

•HRES 80 EH

and national information, organizing annual conferences

and symposiums to discuss ways of improving life-saving

procedures, assisting in research studies, assisting in the

development of public education in fire prevention programs, and supporting and encouraging the delivery of

prehospital emergency medical services by the fire service

to relieve human suffering;

Whereas the Virginia Fire Chiefs Association serves as a fine

example of such a State fire chiefs association, which has

recognized the aforementioned needs and broadened its

mission to serve not only statewide interests, but regional

and national interests;

Whereas upon realizing the need for regional cooperation toward the advancement of fire service in the United

States, the Virginia Fire Chiefs Association established

the Mid-Atlantic Expo and Symposium, which annually

draws from States within the Mid-Atlantic region of the

United States and which serves to educate firefighters on

new techniques; and

Whereas on the occasion of their 75th Anniversary, the Virginia Fire Chiefs Association, will be once again hosting

their annual Mid-Atlantic Expo and Symposium, on February 24, 2005: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives commends

all fire chiefs associations on the outstanding service that

they provide to the citizens of the United States.

Attest:

Clerk.
Front side BMS board

S S

C1

IC6

IC5

IC4

IC9 IC2 IC3

IC14 

IC16

IC17

IC19

CN-1

CN-2

C2

C3

IC1

IC7

IC4

IC7

IC8

IC10

IC10 IC11

T1

IC12

IC13

IC15

IC16 IC19

IC18
IC 2,3,4-AQW210 623 

IC1-MC9S12DG128MPV-ND C1-PCE3155TR-ND 

C2 - PCE3155TR-ND 

C3 - PCE3155TR-ND IC5-

IC6- 495-1868-2-ND 

IC7- TLE42754D-ND 

C3 - PCE3155TR-ND 

IC8- 497-1548-1-ND 

IC10- 160-1305-5-ND 

IC9-IPS041L-ND 

IC11- 516-1731-1-ND
IC13- 631-1011-6-ND

IC12- 601636

T1-811-1556-5-ND 

IC18, IC19- MM74HC14SJX-ND 

CN1, CN2- WM3809-ND 

IC14- 606 SS 21

IC13- 631-1011-6-ND

IC15- 497-1170-2-ND 

IC16, IC17-OPA343UA/2K5-ND 
21 mixed value capacitors

7

2

2

3

2

1

1

3 2
12

1

26 mixed resistors

10

1

1

1
Other side of the board

IC20 IC21

IC22 IC23

IC24

IC25 IC26

IC27 IC32

IC28 

IC29 IC30

IC31

IC33

IC34
IC20, IC21, IC22, IC23- 296-17563-2-ND

IC28, IC29, IC30- 255-2130-2-ND 

IC32, IC33, IC34- MM74HC14SJX-ND

IC31- IPS041L-ND
47 mixed capacitors

5

3

9

27

7
43 mixed value resistors

4

1

19

15

4