alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
        32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION 906
        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 In
        connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Southwall
        Technologies Inc. (the “Company”), for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, as
        filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
        “Report”), I, Dr. Eugene Goodson, the President and Chief Executive Officer
        of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
        adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        that:
 
 1)
              the
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 
 2)
              the
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                  Company.
 
  November
                  13 , 2006
              By:
              /s/ Dr. Eugene GoodsonDr.
                  Eugene Goodson*President
                  and Chief Executive Officer*
 
  A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
        document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
        that
        appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
        required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be
        retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
        or its staff upon request.
 
 In
        accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K, this certification is being
“furnished” as Exhibit 32.1 to the Company's quarterly report and shall not
        be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act
        of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that
        section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under
        the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as expressly set forth
        by
        specific reference in such a filing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-04-1999
<CASH>                                             538
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,954
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (816)
<INVENTORY>                                      5,970
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,189
<PP&E>                                          60,820
<DEPRECIATION>                                (28,485)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  52,372
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,707
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             8
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,520
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    52,372
<SALES>                                         13,479
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,479
<CGS>                                            9,444
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,707
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (307)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    465
<INCOME-TAX>                                        13
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                452
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       452
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06


</TABLE>
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS. WR-81,819-01; WR-81,819-02; WR-81,819-03

EX PARTE BRYAN C. DUDLEY, Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. 1309281-A; 1309282-A; 1309283-A 

IN THE 230TH DISTRICT COURT FROM HARRIS COUNTY

YEARY, J., filed a dissenting opinion.

DISSENTING OPINION

I dissent for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Ex parte Fournier, 473

S.W.3d 789 (Tex. Crim. App. 2015).

FILED: FEBRUARY 10, 2016

DO NOT PUBLISH
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 953 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 953

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         June 21, 2018.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 6136) to amend the immigration laws and 
provide for border security, and for other purposes. All points of order against 
consideration of the bill are waived. The bill shall be considered as read. All 
points of order against provisions in the bill are waived. The previous question 
shall be considered as ordered on the bill and on any amendment thereto to final 
passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate, with 40 
minutes equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member 
of the Committee on the Judiciary and 20 minutes equally divided and controlled 
by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Homeland Security; 
and (2) one motion to recommit.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### § 1230.40 Required label information.

Containers which are offered for import shall in all cases bear labels or stickers having thereon the information required by section 2(b) (1), (2), and (3) of the Federal Caustic Poison Act and the directions for treatment in the case of personal injury, except such directions need not appear on the label or sticker at the time of shipment by a wholesaler or manufacturer for other than household use.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                               1
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   596
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     596
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              595
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       596
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,379
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,479
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   753
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   710
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 209
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (46)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (46)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (46)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (821.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (821.43)
        

</TABLE>
#### FAIRMOUNT INVESTMENT CORPORATION, PROSECUTOR, v. STATE BOARD OF TAX APPEALS ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

Submitted October 4, 1938

Decided February 3, 1939.

*107Before Justices Case, Donges and Porter.

Eor the prosecutor, *Louis J. Greenberg.*

Eor the defendants, *James A. Hamill*and *Frank P. McCarthy.*

Per Curiam.

This is an application for *certiorari*to review a determination of the State Board of Tax Appeals setting aside a finding of the Hudson County Board of Taxation and reinstating an assessment made by the local assessors of Jersey City. The sole ground of attack is failure of proper service of the petition of appeal from the judgment of the county board.

The admitted facts appear to be that service within time was made at the home of the secretary of the prosecutor corporation by delivery of the petition to his daughter, who is said to be a minor; that the petition was in fact delivered to the secretary by the said daughter; that a time for hearing was fixed of which notice was given the prosecutor; that, the matter not being reached on the day fixed, an adjourned day was fixed and notice given; that prosecutor appeared specially by its attorney on said day and moved to dismiss the appeal because of failure of proper service of the petition of appeal; that this motion was subsequently denied and a new day fixed whereon the prosecutor’s attorney again appeared specially, renewed the motion to dismiss and then refused to participate in the hearing on the merits.

We are of the opinion that the service was adequate. It is undenied that the petition of appeal actually came into the hands of the secretary of prosecutor, an officer upon whom such service can be made. In similar proceedings it has been held that the service is good where the person to be served actually receives the papers to be served and that “if the facts stated justify a reasonable inference that the notice actually came to his hands, in the absence of counter proof, that *108inference should be drawn.” *Wilson*v. *Trenton,*53 *N. J. L.*645. See, also, *Ruhle*v. *Caffrey,*115 *Id.*517. Here it is not necessary to rely upon inference. It is admitted that the secretary received the petition from his daughter. This, we think, is sufficient in a proceeding of this kind.

The application is denied, with costs.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 204 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 204

              Declaring support for Brain Awareness Week.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 16, 2017

Mr. Blumenauer (for himself, Mrs. McMorris Rodgers, Ms. Norton, Mr. Ted 
    Lieu of California, Mr. Sessions, and Mr. Smith of Washington) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                         on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
              Declaring support for Brain Awareness Week.

Whereas more than 1,000 neurological and neurodegenerative diseases, such as 
        schizophrenia, traumatic brain injury, autism and Parkinson's disease 
        affect the lives of nearly 100 million Americans;
Whereas neurological and neurodegenerative diseases are the leading contributors 
        to global disease burden;
Whereas neurological illnesses and mental disorders cost the United States more 
        than $760 billion per year and can only be decreased through improved 
        prevention, treatment, and the development of cures;
Whereas the Brain Research through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies 
        (BRAIN) Initiative, whose multi-agency, cross-disciplinary work involves 
        private and public entities, including the National Institutes of Health 
        and the National Science Foundation, among others, is promoting research 
        to develop new tools and technologies to revolutionize our understanding 
        of the human brain and create lifesaving breakthroughs; and
Whereas one dollar of research funding for the National Institutes of Health and 
        the National Science Foundation each generates more than two dollars of 
        economic output: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives does hereby declare 
support for Brain Awareness Week and calls upon all Americans to 
recognize the valuable contributions that have been made to date in 
brain and spinal cord research and to support the conduct of this 
critical research in the future.
                                 <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 112
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 112 appear at 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 112.7 What records must I establish and keep if my farm is eligible for a qualified exemption in accordance with § 112.5? If your farm is eligible for a qualified exemption in accordance with § 112.5: ( a ) You must establish and keep records required under this provision in accordance with the requirements of subpart O of this part, except that the requirement in § 112.161(a)(4) for a signature or initial of the person performing the activity is not required for sales receipts kept in the normal course of business. Such receipts must be dated as required under § 112.161(a)(4).
( b ) You must establish and keep adequate records necessary to demonstrate that your farm satisfies the criteria for a qualified exemption that are described in § 112.5, including a written record reflecting that you have performed an annual review and verification of your farm's continued eligibility for the qualified exemption.
§ 1.1160 How will FDA review test results and analytical reports? ( a ) If FDA finds that any test result, analytical report, related documents, or the associated analysis contains deficiencies or otherwise indicates that any aspect of the food testing is not being conducted in compliance with this subpart, FDA will notify the LAAF-accredited laboratory that submitted the analytical report of any deficiency and may: ( 1 ) Require the laboratory to correct the test result, analytical report, related documents, or the associated analysis;
( 2 ) Revoke permission to submit abridged reports for that major food testing discipline under § 1.1153(b);
( 3 ) Require a corrective action under § 1.1161(a);
( 4 ) Consider the analysis to be invalid; and/or
( 5 ) Notify the owner or consignee of the deficiency.
( b ) FDA may report any deficiencies identified during its review of any test results, reports, and related documents under this subpart to the recognized accreditation body that LAAF-accredits the laboratory.
( c ) Nothing in this subpart shall be construed to limit the ability of FDA to review and act on information received about food testing, including determining the sufficiency of such information and testing.
AI_ FRANKF_N sunk

MINNF5(J I"A C>N-3flfl 202-1_245RAl

l 

# lm^^^I ^tatEs W/15HVNGl`ON, [)C 20510 -2309 

### May 2$, 2014

"I'hc Honorable Barack Obama President of the United States The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20500

Dear President Obama: As you know, the Clean Air Act requires the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to regulate air emissions, including greei-diouse gases (GI1G), from various sources. Ainong these sources are more than 500 coal-fired power plants (CFPPs) that supply about 40 percent of the nation's electricity, but are also large sources of GHG emissions. While section 1 I 1(d) of the Clean Air Act requires regulating existing CFPPs, it also allows for the EPA to give states tlexibility on how to implement regulations. As your Adtninistration works to create GHG performance standards for existing CFPPs, 1 respectfully request that these regulations allow CI , PP compliance tivough improved energy efticiency and renewable energy expansion, and that you consider flexible implementation and accountability at the regional level. Many ernission reduction oppoi-tunities exist at the point of the end user of energy. Recent analysis by the American Couneil for an Energy-Efficient Economy shows that investments in energy efficiency, through retrofits atid other niechanisms, cati reduce U.S. energy consumption by up to 60 percent by 2050. It is therefore imperative that the EPA regulations allow states the flexibility to count improved energy efficicncy by end users toward compliance. Without such flexibility, the cost of compliance on electricity providers and consumers could be higher, without any additional environmental gains. Reducing GHG emissions through renewable generation is an additional toot that could be utilized for effective I 1 I(d) implenlentation. GHGs released from power plants can be negated, on a tict basis, by inereasing renewable generation. Existing programs for clean renewable generation (including biomass), as well as the flexibility for new programs, should be allowed. These programs would provide additional flexibility in rneeting 111(d) requirements while still decreasing net GHG emissions. Furthe.rmore, any .regulations under 111(d) should allow sufficient flexibility for the regional utilities that already set • ve customers. Many utilities operate power generation, transinission, and distribution systems spannirig multiple states. Rather than encouraging a patchwork oi'different regulations for each state withiil the region, the EPA should allow compliance through existing networks at the regional level. "T'his flexibility will achieve the goals of t:he C'lean Air Act without putting an undue burden on utilities.Providing for flexibility in the implementation ot' 111(d) will create local jobs in retrotitting and

energy efficiency technologies; the renewable sector; and othcr areas of the economy. Flexibility will also help protect ratepayers from unnecessary increases in the cost of electricity while sirnultaneously fulfilling the goals of the Clean Air Act. Thank you for your attention to this important matter. Sincerely,
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 711 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 711

To amend title XXVII of the Public Health Service Act to eliminate the 
    short-term limited duration insurance exemption with respect to 
                 individual health insurance coverage.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 1, 2023

Ms. Castor of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XXVII of the Public Health Service Act to eliminate the 
    short-term limited duration insurance exemption with respect to 
                 individual health insurance coverage.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Throw Away Junk Plans Act''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATING THE SHORT-TERM LIMITED DURATION INSURANCE EXEMPTION 
              WITH RESPECT TO INDIVIDUAL HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE.

    Section 2791(b)(5) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 
300gg-91(b)(5)) is amended by inserting ``(other than such insurance 
that is issued, sold, or renewed on or after April 1, 2023)'' before 
the period at the end.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 1302.02 Definitions.

Any term contained in this part shall have the definition set forth in section 102 of the Act (21 U.S.C. 802) or part 1300 of this chapter.

[62 FR 13958, Mar. 24, 1997]
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

Press RoomNEWSLETTERS
###### Editorial Note on Part 180

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 180 appear at 79 FR 75879, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 180.145 Does an exclusion under the Federal procurement system affect a person's eligibility to participate in nonprocurement transactions?

If any Federal agency excludes a person under the FAR on or after August 25, 1995, the excluded person is also ineligible to participate in Federal agencies' nonprocurement covered transactions. Therefore, an exclusion under the FAR has reciprocal effect in Federal nonprocurement transactions.
ANNA M. WHALEN

,

Appellant,

v.

OPIS MANAGEMENT

RESOURCES, LLC AND

ESIS/WC CLAIMS

,

Appellee s

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 830

_____________________________/

Opinion filed January 16, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Judge of Com pensation Claims.

Wilbur W. Anderson , Judge

.

Date of Accident: May 6, 2008.

Wayne Johnson of DeCiccio & Johnson, Winter Park , for Appellant.

R. G. (Mack) McC ormick, Jr. of the Bleakley Bavol Law Firm, Tampa, for

Appellee s

.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

BENTON, WETHERELL, and SWANSON, JJ., CONCUR.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       2,407,485
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,912,551
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      92,110,947
<DEPRECIATION>                              36,496,024
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             149,199,776
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,492,475
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                (35,882,699)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               149,199,776
<SALES>                                     29,115,743
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            29,115,743
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               25,715,695
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           8,937,035
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,902,976)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,902,976)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>