alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SERVED: MARCH 6, 2012 

,:RANSPORW[0M 

- OoKhT OPFRAJ!ONS 

mi m ~-\ p |:2i 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OE HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

CHARLE S J. DALTON 

FAA DOCKET No. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Case) 

DMSFAA-201 1-0681 

ORDER ENTERING DEFAULT JUDGMEN T 

AGAINST RESPONDENT 

The Order 10 Show Cause of February 7, 2012, issued hi response to the Motion 

for Decision of the Federal Aviation Administration ("Complainant"), directed 

Respondent Charles J. Dalion ("Respondent") to make certain filings by February 24, 

2012 or risk sanctions. Specifically, the Order to Show Cause directed Respondent, by 

February 24, 2012, to I) respond to the Order to Show Cause, stating why the relief 

requested in Complainant's Motion should not be granted; 2) answer Complainant's 

Complaint; and 3) comply with our Procedural Order dated December 22, 2011. Failing 

to do each of these things in full, the Order to.Show Cause warned, could result in 

sanctions therein listed, up to and including default (Order to Show Cause, p. 2,1(4). 

Respondent has failed to submit any response at all. 

Respondent has been given ample time and several opportunities to respond. He 

has already been warned of the risks of a failure to comply. Yet Mr. Dalton has ignored 

all pleas. He has failed utterly in his pretrial responsibilities to Complainant and to this 

Court. 
• / 

WHEREFORE, Complainant's Motion for Decision, dated January 17, 2012, 

having been read and considered, it is ORDERED as follows: 

1. Respondent's Request for Hearing be and is hereby DISMISSED with 

prejudice; 

2. The hearing scheduled to be heard beginning June 4, 2012, pursuant to 

Hearing Notice dated February 28, 2012, is hereby CANCELLED; and 

3. Judgmenl be and is hereby ENTERED for Complainant and as to civil 

penalty in the amount of $27;500.00 against Respondent, as requested 

in Complainant's Complaint. 

!.ichard C. Goodwin 

LS. Administrative Law Judge 

Attacliment - Service List 
FDMS No. FAA-2011-068 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Charles J. Dalton, Responc/enf 

4132 WilliwawDr. 

Irvine, CA 92620 

Stephen W. Brice, Co/np/ainaf// 's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of Regional Counsel 

Eastern Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

TEL: 718-553-3268 

FAX: 718-995-5699 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

:]200 New Jersey Avenue, S E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 StalT Assistant/Paralegal 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use llie following address: 

Federal Aviation Adniinistrdlion, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W.. Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 

2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

-2-
H. Res. 375 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 7, 2017. 

Resolved, That at any time after adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, 

declare the House resolved into the Committee of the Whole 

House on the state of the Union for consideration of the bill 

(H.R. 10) to create hope and opportunity for investors, consumers, and entrepreneurs by ending bailouts and Too Big 

to Fail, holding Washington and Wall Street accountable, 

eliminating red tape to increase access to capital and credit, 

and repealing the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act that 

make America less prosperous, less stable, and less free, and 

for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the 

bill are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill 

and shall not exceed 90 minutes equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the 

Committee on Financial Services. After general debate the 

bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute 

rule. In lieu of the amendment in the nature of a substitute 
2 

•HRES 375 EH 

recommended by the Committee on Financial Services now 

printed in the bill, it shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute 

rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in 

part A of the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. That amendment in the nature of a 

substitute shall be considered as read. All points of order 

against that amendment in the nature of a substitute are 

waived. No amendment to that amendment in the nature of 

a substitute shall be in order except those printed in part B 

of the report of the Committee on Rules. Each such amendment may be offered only in the order printed in the report, 

may be offered only by a Member designated in the report, 

shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time 

specified in the report equally divided and controlled by the 

proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division of 

the question in the House or in the Committee of the Whole. 

All points of order against such amendments are waived. At 

the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the 

Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with 

such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member 

may demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment 

adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the 

amendment in the nature of a substitute made in order as 
3 

•HRES 375 EH 

original text. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage 

without intervening motion except one motion to recommit 

with or without instructions. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                     EXHIBIT 5.1
 
                      OPINION OF PRESTON GATES & ELLIS LLP
 
April 7, 1998
 
Western Wireless Corporation
2001 NW Sammamish Road
Issaquah, Washington, 98027
 
     Re: Registration Statement on Form S-3
 
Ladies and Gentleman:
 
     In connection with the registration of shares of Class A Common Stock, no
par value per share (the "Shares"), of Western Wireless Corporation (the
"Company") with the Securities and Exchange Commission on a Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (the "Registration Statement"), relating to the sales of
the Shares by certain selling shareholders named in the Registration Statement,
we have examined such documents, records and matters of law as we have
considered relevant.
 
     Based on this review, it is our opinion that the Shares will be fully paid
and non-assessable under the Washington Business Corporation Act when
certificates representing the Shares shall have been duly executed,
countersigned and registered and duly delivered to the purchasers thereof
against payment of the agreed consideration therefor.
 
     We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement and to all references to our firm included in or made a
part of the Registration Statement.
 
                                          Very truly yours,
 
                                          PRESTON GATES & ELLIS LLP
 
                                          By:    /s/ G. SCOTT GREENBURG
 
                                            ------------------------------------
                                                     G. Scott Greenburg
Exhibit 32

 

Certification

 

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:

> 
(1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Inland's Monthly Income Fund, L.P. (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;

(2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(3) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inland's Monthly Income Fund, L.P.

 

 

By: Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation      General Partner

 

/S/ Brenda G. Gujral____________________

Name: Brenda G. GujralTitle: President of the General Partner and          principal executive officer of Inland's Monthly Income Fund, L.P

Date: November 12, 2003
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 2 0 2 3

- 2453

_____________________________
M YRON R. D AVIS ,
Petitioner
,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Prohibition

— Original Jurisdiction

.

January 17, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
D ISMISSED

. Sherrod v. Franza
, 427 So. 2d 161, 164 (Fla. 1983); Barstad v. State , 925 So. 2d 1135 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).

R AY , M

. K. T HOMAS , and N ORDBY , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Myron R. Davis
, pro se, Petitioner

.2 Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Respondent

.
**Exhibit 35.1**

 

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

 

I, Erin M. Rohde, certify that:

 

(a)                                 A review of the Servicer’s activities and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement during the period from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014 has been made under my supervision.

 

(b)                                 To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period.

 

 
| Dated March 18, 2015 |                                  |
|---------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                      |                                  |
|                      | /s/ Erin M. Rohde                     |
|                      | Erin M. Rohde                         |
|                      | Assistant Treasurer of                |
|                      | Ford Motor Credit Company LLC,        |
|                      | as Servicer of Ford Credit Auto Lease |
|                      | Trust 2013-A                          |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1

 

Certification

 

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Inland's Monthly Income Fund, L.P. (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;

(2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(3) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inland's Monthly Income Fund, L.P.
Dismissed and Opinion Filed February 2, 2017 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-01159-CV 

IN THE INTEREST OF C.S.N. AND J.T.N., CHILDREN 

On Appeal from the 301st Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DF-00-14691 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Francis, Fillmore, and Stoddart 

Opinion by Justice Francis 

By notice of appeal filed September 26, 2016, Tracy Nixon challenges the trial court’s 

September 12, 2016 child support contempt conditional release order and the trial court’s order 

to withdraw admissions and substitute response. Because neither order appeared to be 

appealable, we directed Nixon to file a letter brief addressing our jurisdiction over the appeal. 

See CMH Homes v. Perez, 340 S.W.3d 444, 447 (Tex. 2011) (appellate courts have jurisdiction 

over final judgment and interlocutory orders specifically authorized as appealable by statute); In 

re Office of Attorney Gen. of Tex., 215 S.W.3d 913, 915-16 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2007, orig. 

proceeding) (because contempt proceedings are not concerned with disposing of all claims and 

parties before trial court, a contempt order is not a final judgment and is not appealable). Nixon 

complied, but nothing in his brief persuades us we have jurisdiction over the complained-of 
 –2– 

orders.1

 Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.3(a); Perez, 340 S.W.3d 447; Office of Attorney Gen., 215 S.W.3d at 915. 

161159F.P05 

 

 1 We allowed appellees an opportunity to respond, but they did not file a response. 

/Molly Francis/ 

MOLLY FRANCIS 

JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

IN THE INTEREST OF C.S.N. AND J.T.N., 

CHILDREN 

No. 05-16-01159-CV 

 On Appeal from the 301st Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DF-00-14691. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Francis. 

Justices Fillmore and Stoddart participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal. 

Judgment entered February 2, 2017.
l^cte t hO^Ozr-XJO(yf^2,Wl/ 

7 0 0 POPLAR STREE T 

ROBER T A.B.REICHER T OFFICE OF THE MAYOR RO. BOX 247 

n.w^,-, MACON . GEORGI A 31202-0247 

MAYOK 

(47B) 751-717 0 fflttg ofjiMatan FAX .478) 75,7931 

July 19,2010 

Mr. Dennis DeVany 

Chief, Essential Air Service Division, X-53 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

Department of Transportation i' 

400 Seventh Street, S .W. "i^ 

Washington, D.C. 20590 c3 

Dear Mr. DeVany: 

Thank you for your invitation to provide comments on behalf of our community regarding the 

Essential Air Service Proposals received for the Middle Georgia Regional Airport. 

We appreciate the interest of all applicants in serving our community. After careful review of the 

submittals, it appears only Gulfstream International and Pacific Wings dba GeorgiaSkies have existing 

interline and baggage transfer agreements with major airline carriers, a top consideration for ensuring 

passengers can connect to their destinations at the hub airport. 

Gulfstream International Airlines would be capable of providing a quality service to our region. 

Orlando service provides travelers numerous opportunities to make domestic and international connections 

and also is a top destination from the Middle Georgia region according to a 2001 ticket-lift study. We 

agree with Gulfstream's proposal that Florida flights would demonstrate this market demand, with a goal of 

reducing future subsidy needs. Additionally, Gulfstream is equipped to support nearby Warner Robins Air 

Force Base based on its approved status under the 32 CFR Part 861 Department of Defense Commercial 

Air Transportation Quality and Safety Review Program. 

Pacific Wings' proposal to serve Atlanta under a code-share agreement with a major carrier could 

also be recommended, provided such agreement could be attained. We agree with Pacific Wings' 

statements that code sharing is key to driving ridership and reducing the per-passenger subsidy in the 

Atlanta market. Pacific Wings' gate access into the Atlanta terminal as well as its low fares demonstrate the 

company's continuing efforts to improve service to our community. If Pacific Wings could satisfactorily 

demonstrate to the Department that a code-share agreement would be obtained upon award, we would 

endorse the service. 

Thank you for your time and consideration in this selection. Should you have any questions, 

please do not hesitate to contact me or the Airport Manager, Scott Coffman at (478) 788-3760. 

Sinparely, 

^ 

Robert A.B. Reichert 

Mayor
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

ORDER AMENDING RULE

126 OF THE PENNSYLVANIA

RULES OF APPELLATE

PROCEDURE :

:

:

:

:

:

: NO. 278

APPELLATE PROCEDURAL RULES

DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW

, this 4 th day of March, 2019, upon the recommendation of the

Appellate Court Procedural Rules Committee ; the proposal having been published for

public comment at 47 Pa.B. 7 (January 7, 2017) :

It is Ordered pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania

that Rule 126 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedure is amended in the

at tached form.

This Order shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(b), and shall

be effective May 1, 2019

.

Additions to the rule are shown in bold and are underlined.

Deletions from the ru le are shown in bold and brackets.
<PAGE>   1


                                     - 110 -


                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                            CAMPBELL, SAUNDERS & CO.
                              CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS






October 19, 1998



The Board of Directors
Glamis Gold Ltd.

Dear Sirs:

We consent to the inclusion of our report dated May 8, 1998, relating to the
Consolidated Balance Sheet of Mar-West Resources ltd. as at December 31, 1997
and April 30, 1997 and the Consolidated Statements of Operations, Deficit and
Changes in Financial Position for the 8 months ended December 31, 1997, for the
12 months ended April 30, 1997 and for the period from inception to December 31,
1997, in the Form 8-K of Glamis Gold Ltd. dated October 21, 1998 and to the
incorporation by reference of such in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 of
Glamis Gold ltd.

Yours very truly,

"signed"

Chartered Accountants
Vancouver, Canada
October 19, 1998






  650 West Georgia Street, Suite 1200, P.O. Box 11544, Vancouver, B.C. V6B 4N7
                    Telephone: 604 681 5500 Fax: 604 685 7100
          CAMPBELL, SAUNDERS & CO. IS A MEMBER OF NEXIA INTERNATIONAL,
              A WORLDWIDE NETWORK OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTING FIRMS
§ 1314.20 Restrictions on sales quantity. ( a ) Without regard to the number of transactions, a regulated seller (including a mobile retail vendor) may not in a single calendar day sell any purchaser more than 3.6 grams of ephedrine base, 3.6 grams of pseudoephedrine base, or 3.6 grams of phenylpropanolamine base in scheduled listed chemical products.
( b ) A mobile retail vendor may not in any 30-day period sell an individual purchaser more than 7.5 grams of ephedrine base, 7.5 grams of pseudoephedrine base, or 7.5 grams of phenylpropanolamine base in scheduled listed chemical products.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7133 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7133

 To authorize use of amounts from emergency solutions grants under the 
   McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act to provide safe overnight 
    parking facilities for homeless persons, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 30, 2024

 Mr. Carbajal (for himself, Mr. LaMalfa, Mr. Vargas, and Mr. Valadao) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize use of amounts from emergency solutions grants under the 
   McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act to provide safe overnight 
    parking facilities for homeless persons, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Naomi Schwartz and Susan Rose Safe 
Parking Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. SAFE PARKING AS ELIGIBLE ACTIVITY UNDER EMERGENCY SOLUTIONS 
              GRANT PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (a) of section 415 of the McKinney-
Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11374(a)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraphs (4) and (5) as paragraphs 
        (5) and (6), respectively; and
            (2) by inserting after paragraph (3) the following new 
        paragraph:
            ``(4) Maintenance, operation, insurance, and provision of 
        utilities related to safe parking.''.
    (b) Definition.--Section 401 of the McKinney-Vento Homeless 
Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11360) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraphs (24) through (35) as 
        paragraphs (25) through (36), respectively; and
            (2) by inserting after paragraph (23) the following new 
        paragraph:
            ``(24) The term `safe parking' means an activity that--
                    ``(A) provides homeless persons living in vehicles, 
                including motor homes, with a safe place to park their 
                vehicles overnight to facilitate a transition to more 
                stable housing; and
                    ``(B) provides re-housing and supportive services 
                to such homeless persons.''.
                                 <all>
```
###### Editorial Note on [Part 172](/current/title-21/part-172?toc=1)

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 172 appear at [61 FR 14482](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/61-FR-14482), Apr. 2, 1996; [66 FR 56035](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/66-FR-56035), Nov. 6, 2001; [66 FR 66742](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/66-FR-66742), Dec. 27, 2001; [68 FR 15355](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/68-FR-15355), Mar. 31, 2003; [70 FR 40880](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/70-FR-40880), July 15, 2005; [70 FR 67651](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/70-FR-67651), Nov. 8, 2005; [70 FR 72074](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/70-FR-72074), Dec. 1, 2005; and [81 FR 49896](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/81-FR-49896), July 29, 2016.

#### § 172.110 BHA.

The food additive BHA (butylated hydroxyanisole) alone or in combination with other antioxidants permitted in food for human consumption in this subpart B may be safely used in or on specified foods, as follows:

(a) The BHA meets the following specification:

Assay (total BHA), 98.5 percent minimum. Melting point 48 °C minimum.

(b) The BHA is used alone or in combination with BHT, as an antioxidant in foods, as follows:

| Food | Limitations (total BHA and BHT) parts per million |
| --- | --- |
| Dehydrated potato shreds | 50 |
| Active dry yeast | 1 1,000 |
| Beverages and desserts prepared from dry mixes | 1 2 |
| Dry breakfast cereals | 50 |
| Dry diced glazed fruit | 1 32 |
| Dry mixes for beverages and desserts | 1 90 |
| Emulsion stabilizers for shortenings | 200 |
| Potato flakes | 50 |
| Potato granules | 10 |
| Sweet potato flakes | 50 |
| | |
| --- | --- |
| 1 BHA only. | |

(c) To assure safe use of the additive:

(1) The label of any market package of the additive shall bear, in addition to the other information required by the Act, the name of the additive.

(2) When the additive is marketed in a suitable carrier, in addition to meeting the requirement of [paragraph (c)(1)](/on/2024-09-17/title-21/section-172.110#p-172.110(c)(1)) of this section, the label shall declare the percentage of the additive in the mixture.

(3) The label or labeling of dry mixes for beverages and desserts shall bear adequate directions for use to provide that beverages and desserts prepared from the dry mixes contain no more than 2 parts per million BHA.