alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.3


VISTEON CORPORATION
ORGANIZATION AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
February 3, 2017
Amendment of Visteon Corporation 2010 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
WHEREAS, Visteon Corporation (the “Corporation”) maintains the Visteon Corporation 2010 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the “SERP”) for the benefit of eligible management employees of the Corporation and its affiliates; and
WHEREAS, the Committee deems it in the best interest of the Corporation to amend the SERP in certain respects;
NOW, THEREFORE, RESOLVED, that the SERP is amended, effective January 1, 2017, in the following respects:
1.    Section 1.01(o) is amended by adding the following sentence at the conclusion thereof:
Effective January 1, 2017, the Plan is closed to new Participants other than (a) employees who are assigned to a position by the Company (or by a Participating Employer with the consent of the Company) of a Level 19 or above, or (b) employees who are specifically designated for participation by the Committee. 
2.    Section 4.03 is amended to read as follows:
As of the last day of each month following a Participant’s entry into the Plan and during which the Participant is employed in a Covered Employment Classification, the Company shall credit to a notional account for the Participant a Company contribution credit equal to a percentage of the Eligible Compensation paid to the Participant during that month, as determined in accordance with the following schedule:
	
		
	Level
	Contribution Credit as a Percentage of Eligible Compensation

	18 and below (if specifically designated for participation by the Committee) 
	6%

	19 and 20 
	9%

	21
	14.5%






3.    Section 7.08 is amended 2017 by deleting the references to the “Senior Vice President, Human Resources” and inserting in lieu thereof “Chief Human Resources Officer”.
FURTHER RESOLVED, that in accordance with the authority granted pursuant to Section 7.08 of the SERP, the Corporation’s Chief Human Resources Officer is hereby authorized and directed to adopt such further amendments to the SERP, or to otherwise take such actions and execute such documents, as determined by such officer to be necessary or desirable in order to effectuate the foregoing resolution.
H. Res. 35 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

December 12, 2018. 

Whereas the American Red Cross advocates that improved 

education and access to automated external defibrillators 

(AEDs) could save 50,000 lives each year; 

Whereas the average response time to a 911 call is 8 to 12 

minutes; 

Whereas the likelihood of survival is reduced approximately 

10 percent for each minute defibrillation is delayed; and 

Whereas sudden cardiac arrest is most effectively treated by 

combining CPR and defibrillation: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that— 

(1) public schools in possession of one or more 

AEDs should schedule annual AED education for all 

school personnel, for which staff meetings or in-service 

days allocated under State law for professional development programs in emergency first aid and 

cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) may be used; 

(2) such public schools should consider including in 

such annual AED education instruction on the use of 
2 

•HRES 35 EH 

AEDs and information for school personnel relating to 

the locations of AEDs, the school’s response plan, and 

the members of the school response team; 

(3) each public school in possession of one or more 

AEDs should conduct an annual CPR and AED drill for 

school personnel to practice the use of these life-saving 

measures and to evaluate the school’s preparedness in 

the event of a sudden cardiac arrest; and 

(4) when planning the education and drills, local 

educational agencies (LEAs) and schools should coordinate with other schools operating education programs, 

any State-issued recommendations as to the development 

or usage of appropriate programs, and the American 

Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Order filed June 4, 2013. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-00397-CV

____________

BENEDICT EMESOWUM, Appellant

V.

CHRISTMAS EVE MORGAN, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 1

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1024921

ORDER

On May 6, 2013, appellant filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s final 

judgment signed April 29, 2013. Appellant also filed a request to proceed on 

appeal as a pauper without the advance payment of costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1. 

The County Clerk of Harris County filed a contest to the affidavit on May 7, 2013. 

Id. 20.1(e). The County Clerk also moved for an extension of time to conduct a 

hearing on the contest. Id. 20.1(i). The order granting an extension until May 21, 

2013, that is included in our record is not signed by the trial court. The trial court’s 
2

docket reflects that on May 9, 2013, an order for extension of time was “granted 

and signed.” In addition, the docket reflects that on May 23, 2013, appellant filed a 

request for a rehearing of the denial of his claim of indigence and included an 

affidavit containing additional information. These are not included in our record. 

Accordingly, we issue the following order:

We order the County Clerk of Harris County to file a supplemental clerk’s 

record without the advance payment of costs containing the following:

(1) the order granting an extension of time to conduct a hearing on the 

contest to appellant’s claim of indigence, signed on or about May 9, 

2013;

(2) appellant’s request for rehearing of the order sustaining the contest 

to his claim of indigence filed on or about May 23, 2013; and

(3) appellant’s affidavit of indigence filed on or about May 23, 2013.

The supplemental clerk’s record shall be filed with the clerk of this court 

within three days of the date of this order. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(j)(3).

PER CURIAM
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk July 15, 2009

p0708 

# Order

July 15, 2009

138552

MERHONDA COLE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 138552 COA: 288480 Wayne CC: 07-709887-NI SUBURBAN MOBILITY AUTHORITY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION, d/b/a SMART, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 20, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

K ELLY



### , C.J., and H ATHAWAY



### , J., would grant leave to appeal.
###### Editorial Note on Part 170

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 170 appear at 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001, and 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004.

#### § 170.280 Submission of a supplement.

If circumstances warrant, you may submit a supplement to a filed GRAS notice after we respond to your notice by letter in accordance with § 170.265(b)(1) or cease to evaluate your notice in accordance with § 170.265(b)(3).
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

PUBLIC MEETING ON ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS FOR

GENERAL SERVICE FLUORESCENT LAMPS, INCANDESCENT REFLECTOR

LAMPS AND GENERAL SERVICE INCANDESCENT LAMPS

June 15, 2006

Purpose : The Department is holding this informal public meeting as a first step in the standards

rulemaking process for general service fluorescent lamps, incandescent reflector lamps and

general service incandescent lamps. This meeting is intended to familiarize interested

stakeholders with the approach and analytical tools that the DOE proposes to use in its review

and possible amendment of existing standards for these lamps. The meeting will solicit feedback

on the assumptions, methodology and analytical tools DOE proposes to use in this rulemaking.

9:00 - 9:05 am

9:05 - 9:20 am

9:20 - 9:35 am

9:35 -11:00 am

11:00 - 11:15 am

11:15 - 12:00 pm

12:00 - 1:00 pm

1:00 - 2:00 pm

2:00-2:45 pm

2:45 - 3:00 pm

3:00 - 3:30 pm

3:30 - 4:00 pm

4:00 - 4:30 pm

4:30-5:00 pm

5:00 pm

Welcome

Introductions, agenda review, opening remarks

Rulemaking overview; analytical methodology ; product

definitions

ANOPR ANALYSES:

Market and technology assessment

Break

Screening analysis and engineering analysis

Break for lunch

Markups for equipment price determination; energy use and

end-use load characterization; and life-cycle cost and

payback period analysis

Shipments analysis and national impact analysis

Break

NOPR ANALYSES:

Revisions to ANOPR analyses and LCC subgroup analysis

Manufacturer impact analysis

Utility impact analysis, employment impact analysis,

environmental assessment, and regulatory impact analysis;

FINAL RULE

Other issues and comments; closing remarks

Adjourn

 EE-2006-STD-0131 COMMENT 04.2
Editorial Note on Part 131
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 131 appear at 63 FR 14035, Mar. 24, 1998.

§ 131.125 Nonfat dry milk. ( a ) *Description.* Nonfat dry milk is the product obtained by removal of water only from pasteurized skim milk. It contains not more than 5 percent by weight of moisture, and not more than 11 ⁄ 2 percent by weight of milkfat unless otherwise indicated.
( b ) *Optional ingredients.* Safe and suitable characterizing flavoring ingredients (with or without coloring and nutritive carbohydrate sweetener) as follows: ( 1 ) Fruit and fruit juice, including concentrated fruit and fruit juice.
( 2 ) Natural and artificial food flavorings.
( c ) *Methods of analysis.* The following referenced methods of analysis are from “Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists,” 13th Ed. (1980), which is incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the AOAC INTERNATIONAL, 481 North Frederick Ave., suite 500, Gaithersburg, MD 20877, or may be examined at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .* ( 1 ) Milkfat content—“Fat in Dried Milk—Official Final Action,” sections 16.199-16.200.
( 2 ) Moisture content—“Moisture—Official Final Action,” section 16.192.
( d ) *Nomenclature.* The name of the food is “Nonfat dry milk”. If the fat content is over 11 ⁄ 2 percent by weight, the name of the food on the principal display panel or panels shall be accompanied by the statement “Contains __% milkfat”, the blank to be filled in with the percentage to the nearest one-tenth of 1 percent of fat contained, within limits of good manufacturing practice. The name of the food shall include a declaration of the presence of any characterizing flavoring, as specified in § 101.22 of this chapter.
( e ) *Label declaration.* Each of the ingredients used in the food shall be declared on the label as required by the applicable sections of parts 101 and 130 of this chapter.
[42 FR 14360, Mar. 15, 1977, as amended at 43 FR 19836, May 9, 1978; 47 FR 11823, Mar. 19, 1982; 49 FR 10091, Mar. 19, 1984; 54 FR 24892, June 12, 1989; 58 FR 2890, Jan. 6, 1993]
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7158 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7158

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 5, 2024

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 201 East Battles Road in Santa Maria, California, as the ``Larry 
                   Lavagnino Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LARRY LAVAGNINO POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 201 East Battles Road in Santa Maria, California, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Larry Lavagnino Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Larry 
Lavagnino Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 4, 2024.

            Attest:

                                             KEVIN F. MCCUMBER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Meeting Record | The White House

http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/2060_meeting_09042013[9/13/2013 12:33:39 PM]

Get Email Updates Contact Us

Home • The Administration • Office of Management and Budget

REGULATION &

INFORMATION POLICY

About OIRA

Information Policy

Federal Collection of

Information

Regulatory Matters

Meetings and Outside

Communication

Reports to Congress

For Agencies

Statistical Programs &

Standards

Meeting Record

Meeting Record Regarding: NSPS for Power Plants

Date: 9 / 4 / 2013

Name Affiliation Client (if applicable)

Bob Wayland EPA/OAR

Nick Hudson EPA/OAR

Barry Elman EPA/OP

Kevin Culligan EPA/OAR

Christian Fellner EPA/OAR

Gd Cichanowicz APPA

Bruce Rodan OSTP

Jim Laity OMB/OIRA

Juslie Ritts APPA

Theresa Pugh APPA

Joe Hipper APPA

Desmarie Waterhouse APPA

Nicole Comisky OMB/Environmental Branch

Phillips Foy CEQ

Amanda Thomas OMB

Meeting material provided to OMB ( pages, kb)

Document 1 (108 pages, 6.58 mb)

About OMBlog The Budget Management Regulation & Information Policy Legislative Information Join OMB Contact OMB

Home

The White House Blog

Photos & Videos

Briefing Room

Your Weekly Address

Speeches & Remarks

Issues

Civil Rights

Defense

The Administration

President Barack Obama

Vice President Joe Biden

About the White House

Inside the White House

Presidents

Our Government

The Executive Branch

The Legislative Branch

Federal Register | Join OMB | FOIA | No FEAR Act | OMB Locator | USA.Gov | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Site Search
Meeting Record | The White House

http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/2060_meeting_09042013[9/13/2013 12:33:39 PM]

Photo Galleries

Video

Performances

Live Streams

Podcasts

Press Briefings

Statements & Releases

White House Schedule

Presidential Actions

Legislation

Nominations &

Appointments

Disclosures

Disabilities

Economy

Education

Energy & Environment

Ethics

Equal Pay

Foreign Policy

Health Care

Homeland Security

Immigration

Refinancing

Rural

Service

Seniors & Social Security

Snapshots

Taxes

Technology

Urban and Economic

Mobility

Veterans

Violence Prevention

Women

First Lady Michelle Obama

Dr. Jill Biden

The Cabinet

White House Staff

Executive Office of the

President

Other Advisory Boards

First Ladies

The Oval Office

The Vice President's

Residence & Office

Eisenhower Executive

Office Building

Camp David

Air Force One

White House Fellows

White House Internships

Tours & Events

Mobile Apps

The Judicial Branch

The Constitution

Federal Agencies &

Commissions

Elections & Voting

State & Local Government

Resources

En español Accessibility Copyright Information Privacy Policy Contact

USA.gov Developers Apply for a Job
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*January 25, 2008*

[Cite as *01/25/2008 Case Announcements*#2; 2008-Ohio-269.]

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2007-2289.

#### State ex rel. Lorain v. Stewart.

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. On the parties’ joint motion for expedited consideration and relators’ stipulated notice of substitution of party under Civ.R. 25(D)(1) and stipulated motion for leave to file an amended complaint,

It is ordered that Drake Hopewell, the Housing Officer and Director of Public Safety and Service for the city of Lorain, is automatically substituted for Andrew R. Winemiller as a relator.

It is further ordered that relators’ stipulated motion for leave to file an amended complaint is granted and that respondent’s response to the amended complaint is due within 21 days of this entry.

Pfeifer, J., would deny the motion to expedite.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000945532
<NAME> USABANCSHARES, INC.
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         557,625
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       7,536,508
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  2,505,732
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       7,478,613
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         7,534,157
<LOANS>                                      7,057,197
<ALLOWANCE>                                     60,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,785,523
<DEPOSITS>                                  20,798,909
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            327,772
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       597,082
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,061,760
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              25,785,523
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 67,453
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               64,204
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                39,617
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               171,274
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              90,525
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,967
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           74,782
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   50,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                305,221
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (278,843)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   (278,843)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (278,843)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.16
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    9.28
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               60,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         60,000

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT  99.2


                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                    As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                          Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Semele  Group Inc., a Delaware
corporation  (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as
filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  the  undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002  that:

(1)     the  Report  of  the  Partnership  filed  today  fully complies with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.

                    /s/  Michael  J.  Butterfield
                    -----------------------------
                    Michael  J.  Butterfield
                    Chief  Financial  Officer
                    August  19,  2002
#### WILLIAM D. SAYRS, PROSECUTOR, v. GEORGE E. BRUNNER ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

Argued May 2, 1939

Decided July 11, 1939.

*592Before Justices Parker, Bodine and Perskie.

For the prosecutor, *Carl Kisselman.*

For Frederick W. von Nieda, *Meyer L. Sakin.*

Bodine, J.

The prosecutor, William D. Sayrs, was appointed deputy city clerk of the city of Camden and clerk of elections on September 16th, 1935, and continued to perform the duties thereof until March 9th, 1939. At the time of his original appointment Camden was under the Civil Service law and he was classified in the exempt division of the classified service. Before March 9th, 1939, the city clerk’s department had been assigned to Mary Walsh Kobus, director of public safety, who continued in that capacity until that date. Then the commission by vote of three to two placed the department under the jurisdiction of Frederick von Nieda, director of public affairs. At this meeting, Mr. von Nieda introduced an ordinance abolishing the position of deputy city clerk and clerk of elections for the city of Camden. Thereafter the prosecutor was immediately notified that his services were to be terminated on March 23d, 1939. On that day the ordinance was adopted on final reading, but its operation was suspended by filing with the city commissioners of a petition signed by approximately ten thousand electors of the city of Camden, more than the required number, under the provisions of *R. S.*40 :74-5.

Prosecutor ignored the letter of discharge and continued his work for a short time without interference. On March 28th, 1939, the city clerk by direction of Director von Nieda advised the relator that his presence in the office was no longer required, in spite of the fact that the operation of the ordinance had been suspended as indicated. The relator’s attempt to enter the office and perform his duties was physically obstructed by police officers until the restraint allowed by Mr. Justice Donges at the foot of this rule.

*593“A municipality cannot by ordinance create for a fixed term and fill the position of assistant city clerk, a position clearly falling within the competitive class of the classified service.” *Davaillon*v. *Elizabeth,*121 *N. J. L.*380.

The proofs indicate that the removal was in the interest of economy and so proper. *Durkin*v. *Board of Fire Commissioners, City of Newark,*89 *N. J. L.*468; *Reck*v. *Board of Commissioners of North Bergen,*110 *Id.*173; *May*v. *Board of Commissioners of Town of Nutley,*111 *Id.*166; *Gianettino*v. *Civil Service Commission et al.,*120 *Id.*531.

It is, therefore, unnecessary to consider the other points urged or whether the prosecutor has sought the proper remedy.

The rule will, therefore, be discharged, with costs.