alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1107.24 Change in ownership of an SE Report. An applicant may transfer ownership of its SE Report. On or before the time of transfer, the new and former applicants are required to submit information to FDA as follows: ( a ) The former applicant must sign and submit a notice to FDA that states that all of the former applicant's rights and responsibilities relating to the SE Report have been transferred to the new applicant. This notice must identify the name and address of the new applicant and the SE Report transferred.
( b ) The new applicant must sign and submit a notice to FDA containing the following: ( 1 ) The new applicant's commitment to agreements, promises, and conditions made by the former applicant and contained in the SE Report;
( 2 ) The date that the change in ownership is effective;
( 3 ) Either a statement that the new applicant has a complete copy of the SE Report and order (if applicable), including amendments and records that are required to be kept under § 1107.58, or a request for a copy of the SE Report from FDA's files by submitting a request in accordance with part 20 of this chapter. In accordance with the Freedom of Information Act, FDA will provide a copy of the SE Report to the new applicant under the fee schedule in FDA's public information regulations in § 20.45 of this chapter; and
( 4 ) A certification that no modifications have been made to the new tobacco product since the SE Report was submitted to FDA.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1297 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1297

To make title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 
                   permanent, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 6, 2017

 Mr. Cotton (for himself, Mr. Burr, Mr. Risch, Mr. Rubio, Ms. Collins, 
   Mr. Blunt, Mr. Lankford, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. McCain, Mr. Tillis, Mr. 
    Roberts, Mr. Graham, Mr. Thune, and Mr. Perdue) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To make title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 
                   permanent, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF SUNSET OF TITLE VII OF THE FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE 
              SURVEILLANCE ACT OF 1978.

    (a) Repeal.--Section 403 of the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 (Public 
Law 110-261; 122 Stat. 2474) is amended by striking subsection (b).
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 404 of the FISA Amendments Act 
of 2008 (Public Law 110-261; 50 U.S.C. 1801 note) is amended by 
striking subsection (b).
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-28-1998
<CASH>                                          8,255   
<SECURITIES>                                        7       
<RECEIVABLES>                                  10,802  
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (1005)  
<INVENTORY>                                     8,619   
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               27,745  
<PP&E>                                         51,574  
<DEPRECIATION>                                (24,944)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 55,890  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           8,115   
<BONDS>                                             0       
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            8
<OTHER-SE>                                     32,336 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   55,890 
<SALES>                                        14,057 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               14,057 
<CGS>                                          11,022 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  14,199 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0      
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (182)  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (324)  
<INCOME-TAX>                                       24     
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (348)  
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0      
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0      
<CHANGES>                                           0      
<NET-INCOME>                                     (348)  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.05)  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)  
         

</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                     Exhibit 21


                                  SUBSIDIARIES
                                  ------------




Domestic Subsidiaries of the Company:
-------------------------------------


   Name of Subsidiary                        State of Incorporation
   ------------------                        ----------------------

   PCT International, Inc.                           Delaware

   Flavors Holdings, Inc.                            Delaware

   Pneumo Abex Corporation                           Delaware

   Concord Pacific Corporation                       Maine

   EVD Holdings Inc.                                 Delaware

Foreign Subsidiaries of the Company:
------------------------------------

   Name of Subsidiary                                Jurisdiction
   ------------------                                ------------

   Mafco Establishment                               Liechtenstein

   EVD Holdings S.A.                                 France

   Extraits Vegetaux Et Derives, S.A.                France

   Xianyang Concord Natural Products Co. Ltd.        Peoples Rep. of China

   Mafco Weihai Green Industry of Science and
     Technology Co. Ltd. (50% owned)                 Peoples Rep. of China

   Rishmac Produce & Export Co. (45% owned)          Iran

   Boam Produce (Europe) Est. (45% owned)            Liechtenstein
#### § 114.89 Deviations from scheduled processes.

Whenever any process operation deviates from the scheduled process for any acidified food and/or the equilibrium pH of the finished product is higher than 4.6, the commercial processor of the acidified food shall either: (a) Fully reprocess that portion of the food by a process established by a competent processing authority as adequate to ensure a safe product; (b) thermally process it as a low-acid food under part 113 of this chapter; or (c) set aside that portion of the food involved for further evaluation as to any potential public health significance. The evaluation shall be made by a competent processing authority and shall be in accordance with procedures recognized by competent processing authorities as being adequate to detect any potential hazard to public health. Unless the evaluation demonstrates that the food has undergone a process that has rendered it safe, the food set aside shall either be fully reprocessed to render it safe, or be destroyed. A record shall be made of the procedures used in the evaluation and the results. Either upon completion of full reprocessing and the attainment of a safe food, or after the determination that no significant potential for public health hazard exists, that portion of the food involved may be shipped in normal distribution. Otherwise, the portion of the food involved shall be destroyed.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7180 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.7180

                     One Hundred Eighteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
         the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-four

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 80 1st Street in Kingsland, Arkansas, as the ``Kingsland `Johnny Cash' 
                             Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. KINGSLAND ``JOHNNY CASH'' POST OFFICE.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 80 1st Street in Kingsland, Arkansas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Kingsland `Johnny Cash' Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Kingsland 
`Johnny Cash' Post Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 936 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 936

 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the City of 
  Bowling Green, Kentucky, located in Warren County, can be proud of 
being a part of the history of the production of an American Icon, the 
                        Corvette, for 25 years.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 20, 2006

  Mr. Lewis of Kentucky submitted the following resolution; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the City of 
  Bowling Green, Kentucky, located in Warren County, can be proud of 
being a part of the history of the production of an American Icon, the 
                        Corvette, for 25 years.

Whereas the Corvette is recognized around the world as a finely crafted 
        automobile, and is known for its speed and American spirit;
Whereas the Corvette has been produced at the General Motors Corporation 
        Corvette Assembly Plant in Bowling Green, Kentucky, since 1981;
Whereas the Corvette Assembly Plant assembles more than 35,000 Corvettes each 
        year, and between 150 and 170 Corvettes each day, on a conveyor system 
        that is approximately seven miles long;
Whereas the Corvette Assembly Plant is currently building the sixth generation 
        Corvette;
Whereas it takes approximately 36 hours of work to construct a single Corvette;
Whereas the Corvette Assembly Plant employs hundreds of hard working 
        individuals, including many who are members of United Auto Workers Local 
        2164;
Whereas employees at the Corvette Assembly Plant have been noted for numerous 
        charitable works, including their donation of $200,000 to the local 
        organization of the United Way of America;
Whereas the Corvette Assembly Plant hosts more than 50,000 car enthusiasts each 
        year;
Whereas the National Corvette Museum in Bowling Green, Kentucky, has been open 
        for almost 12 years and draws visitors from across the United States;
Whereas Corvettes have been used as pace cars in the Indianapolis 500 eight 
        times; and
Whereas the Corvette has received over 70 automotive industry awards including 
        the J.D. Power and Associate awarded the ``Best in Segment'' recognition 
        in 2001 and 2002: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That it is the sense of the House of Representatives 
that the City of Bowling Green, Kentucky, located in Warren County, can 
be proud of being a part of the history of the production of an 
American Icon, the Corvette, for 25 years.
                                 <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 102
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 102 appear at 81 FR 49895, July 29, 2016.

§ 102.22 Protein hydrolysates. The common or usual name of a protein hydrolysate shall be specific to the ingredient and shall include the identity of the food source from which the protein was derived. ( a ) “Hydrolyzed wheat gluten,” “hydrolyzed soy protein,” and “autolyzed yeast extract” are examples of acceptable names. “Hydrolyzed casein” is also an example of an acceptable name, whereas “hydrolyzed milk protein” is not an acceptable name for this ingredient because it is not specific to the ingredient (hydrolysates can be prepared from other milk proteins). The names “hydrolyzed vegetable protein” and “hydrolyzed protein” are not acceptable because they do not identify the food source of the protein.
( b ) [Reserved]
[58 FR 2876, Jan. 6, 1993]
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 12, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40445 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE LUIS CORADO, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:03-CR-715-ALL

-------------------- Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Luis Corado has requested leave to withdraw from this appeal and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Corado has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel isNo. 05-40445 -2- excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is
DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                              
<ARTICLE>                                          5
<CIK>                                              0000812818
<NAME>                                  HUTTON INVESTORS FUTURES FUND, L.P. II
                                                    
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                       SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                                     19,372,799
<SECURITIES>                                                4,346,448
<RECEIVABLES>                                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           23,719,247
<PP&E>                                                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             23,719,247
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         647,399
<BONDS>                                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                                 23,071,848
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               23,719,247
<SALES>                                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            2,737,298
<CGS>                                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              474,926
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             2,262,372
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                2,262,372
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                  620.85
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       0
        

</TABLE>
#### JAMES WATSON, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. PENNSYLVANIA-READING SEASHORE LINES, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.

Argued May 2, 1939

Decided July 22, 1939.

Before Brogan, Chief Justice, and Justices Donges and Porter.

For the plaintiff-appellant, *Bartholomew A. Sheehan (Vincent L. Gallagher,*of counsel).

For the defendant-appellee, *French, Richards & Bradley (Floyd H. Bradley, Grace Heritage Smith, of*counsel).

Brogan, Chief Justice.

This is plaintiff’s appeal from a judgment of nonsuit. Plaintiff, on August 16th, 1935, was a passenger on a train of the defendant railroad company en route from Camden to Wildwood. He occupied a seat in the train on the right-hand side immediately next to the window, which was open, the window of the seat immediately *615in front of him being likewise open. The plaintiff testified that a small piece of stone came through the open window of the seat in front of him, struck him in the left eye, and as a result he lost the sight of that eye. The piece of stone in question was identified and one of the plaintiff’s witnesses, a geologist, said that the stone in question was traprock which “is used in the manufacture of concrete, asphalt roads and railroad ballast.”

It is contended that the nonsuit was erroneous; that proof of the facts above set forth were sufficient under the doctrine of *res ipsa loquitur*to raise an inference of negligence which the defendant was bound to explain or negative. Reliance is placed upon cases of which *Whalen*v. *Consolidated Traction Co.,*61 *N. J. L.*606; 40 *Atl. Rep.*645; *Mumma*v. *Easton and A. R. Co.,*73 *N. J. L.*653; 65 *Atl. Rep.*208, are typical. But we are unable to agree that the occurrence in question affords *prima facie*evidence that there was want of the high degree of care incumbent upon common carriers. In cases where the doctrine of *res ipsa loquitur*applies it is an essential that the agency causing the mischief be under the control of the party charged with liability. Such is not the ease here. There is no proof that the small stone which caused this most unfortunate injury was part of the road ballast or that it came from the roadbed at all. It might quite conceivably have been thrown bjr a mischievous person. On this important element of the case the court was right in not leaving the matter to speculation.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.
# L_2021065DE.01008001.xml

| 25.2.2021 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 65/80 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2021

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 65/80

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 18. Juli 2018 über die Haushaltsordnung für den Gesamthaushaltsplan der Union, zur Änderung der Verordnungen (EU) Nr. 1296/2013, (EU) Nr. 1301/2013, (EU) Nr. 1303/2013, (EU) Nr. 1304/2013, (EU) Nr. 1309/2013, (EU) Nr. 1316/2013, (EU) Nr. 223/2014, (EU) Nr. 283/2014 und des Beschlusses Nr. 541/2014/EU sowie zur Aufhebung der Verordnung (EU, Euratom) Nr. 966/2012

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 193 vom 30. Juli 2018
  )

Seite 110, nach Artikel 158:

Anstatt:

„Kapitel 159“

muss es heißen:

„Artikel 159“

---
Exhibit 4.10(a)







Addendum No. 1 to the Service Agreement, dated February 1, 2014


Dated and Signed April 4, 2017







	
BETWEEN:

	
Ituran Location and Control, Ltd.


Public Company No. 52-0043811

	 
	 	
Of: 3 Hashikma Street, Azor

	 
	 	
(hereinafter: "the Company")

	
Party of the First Part;


	
AND:

	
Mr. Eyal Sheratzky

	 
	 	
I.D. No. 023909641

	 
	 	
Of: 7 Shrage Freidman, Tel Aviv

	 
	 	
(hereinafter: "Eyal")

	
Party of the Second Part;


	
AND:

	
ORAS Capital Ltd.

	 
	 	
Private Company No. 514079417

	 
	 	
Of: 14 Dulchin Street, Tel Aviv

	 
	 	
(hereinafter: "the Service Provider")

	
Party of the Third Part;





 



		WHEREAS:	
the Company and the Service Provider and Eyal have entered into a Service Agreement dated February 1, 2014 (hereinafter: "the Agreement").







 



	
AND WHEREAS:

	
the parties wish to extend the term of the Agreement for an additional term of three years;







 


THEREFORE, THE PARTIES DECLARED, AGREED AND STIPULATED AS FOLLOWS:


 


According to Section 6.1 to the Agreement, the term of the Agreement shall be extended for additional three years, starting from February 1, 2017.


 


        AND IN WITNESS THEREOF THE PARTIES HAVE AFFIXED THEIR SIGNATURES:












----------------------             -----------------------------


EYAL                                  THE COMPANY












----------------------


THE EMPLOYER
```

                        CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of M & F Worldwide Corp. (the
"Company") for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Howard Gittis, as
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

       /s/ Howard Gittis
---------------------------
Name:  Howard Gittis
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date:  March 15, 2006
```
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 07838

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

07838\07838_Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement

x 07838\07838_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

07838\07838_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

07838\07838_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 07838\07838_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07838\07838_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07838\07838_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07838\Supporting Documentation\07838_Aerial Map_CBI.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 07838\Supporting Documentation\07838_Water Balance Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.