alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 176
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 176 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; and 70 FR 72074, Dec. 1, 2005.

§ 176.260 Pulp from reclaimed fiber. ( a ) Pulp from reclaimed fiber may be safely used as a component of articles used in producing, manufacturing, packing, processing, preparing, treating, packaging, transporting, or holding food, subject to the provisions of paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) Pulp from reclaimed fiber is prepared from the paper and paperboard products described in paragraphs (b)(1) and (2) of this section, by repulping with water to recover the fiber with the least possible amount of nonfibrous substances. ( 1 ) Industrial waste from the manufacture of paper and paperboard products excluding that which bears or contains any poisonous or deleterious substance which is retained in the recovered pulp and that migrates to the food, except as provided in regulations promulgated under sections 406 and 409 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
( 2 ) Salvage from used paper and paperboard excluding that which ( i ) bears or contains any poisonous or deleterious substance which is retained in the recovered pulp and that migrates to the food, except as provided in regulations promulgated under sections 406 and 409 of the act or
( ii ) has been used for shipping or handling any such substance.
<PAGE>   1





                                                                EXHIBIT 23.1

                          Consent of Price Waterhouse

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-95164, 33-95160, 33-95162, 33-95158, 333-2312 and
333-04357) of Spyglass, Inc. of our report dated October 25, 1996 appearing on
page 31 of the Annual Report to Shareholders which is incorporated in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.  We also consent to the incorporation by reference
of our report on the Financial Statement Schedule listed in Item 14 of this
Form 10-K.

/s/ Price Waterhouse LLP

Price Waterhouse LLP
Chicago, IL


December 20, 1996
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-02T15:49:14-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
Exhibit 32.1


                Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                    as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection  with the Annual  Report of Pro Tech  Communications,  Inc.  ("Pro
Tech") on Form 10-K for the period  ending  December  31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  we,
Richard Hennessey,  President, and Mary Christian-Hein,  Chief Financial Officer
of Pro Tech,  each  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of Pro Tech.



/s/ RICHARD HENNESSEY
---------------------
Richard Hennessey
President
March 29, 2005


/s/ MARY CHRISTIAN-HEIN
-----------------------
Mary Christian-Hein
Chief Financial Officer
March 29, 2005
##### 



Exhibit 32 (b)
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.CSECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
(15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78(d)); and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Partnership.
 Date: 8-10-07
 /s/
    
    GARY S. JONES

Gary S. Jones
President
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Northland Cable Properties Seven Limited Partnership and will be retained by Northland Cable
Properties Seven Limited Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 Exhibit 10.16.1

                                 April 30, 1999

Dr. Charles de Taisne
Pasteur Merieux Connaught
1541 Avenue Marcel Merieux
Marcy L'Etoile, France 69280

Re:  Letter of Intent for Supply and Development Agreement

Dear Charles:

Our April 10, 1998 Letter of Intent provided that we would negotiate and
finalize the necessary definitive agreements by no later than July 15, 1998. It
further provided that the Letter of Intent would be of no further force and
effect if we did not either finalize those agreements by July 15, 1998 or agree
in writing to some other date for finalizing the agreements. We entered into
subsequent agreements in writing which extended the date to finalize the Letter
of Intent to April 15, 1999.

Because the Phase III trials have consumed more of our time than expected, the
agreements cannot be finalized within the time period contemplated. Therefore,
we propose that the time for finalizing the definitive agreements be extended
through November 1, 1999. If the agreements have not been concluded by that
date, the Letter of Intent will be of no further force and effect unless
otherwise agreed in writing.

If the proposed extension is acceptable to you, please sign on the space
provided below and return this letter to me. In the meantime, this delay in
finalizing the agreements should not, in any way, interfere with the
cooperation that we are enjoying in practice. We look forward to working with
you to complete this transaction.

Sincerely:

VAXGEN, INC.

By: /s/ ROBERT C. NOWINKSI
   ------------------------------
        Robert C. Nowinksi, Ph.D.

Date: April 30, 1999
     ----------------------------

AGREED:

PASTEUR MERIEUX CONNAUGHT

By: /s/ CHARLES DE TAISNE
   ------------------------------
        Charles de Taisne

Date: May 3, 1999
     ----------------------------

cc: Ralph M. Pais, Esq.
# L_2018262EN.01009001.xml

| 19.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 262/90 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 262/90

---

Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2018/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 on organic production and labelling of organic products and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 260 of 17 October 2018
  )

This corrigendum should be considered null and void.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PRO TECH COMMUNICATIONS, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED OCTOBER
31, 2000,  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                         0000945481
<NAME>                        Pro Tech Communications, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                    1
<CASH>                                       1,070,408
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  421,372
<ALLOWANCES>                                    26,557
<INVENTORY>                                    558,860
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,082,775
<PP&E>                                         278,805
<DEPRECIATION>                                  51,546
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,652,665
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          662,956
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,505,425
<COMMON>                                        28,248
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,452,349
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,652,665
<SALES>                                      1,562,484
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,562,484
<CGS>                                          623,555
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,898,845
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 7,990
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              36,592
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (374,340)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (374,340)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (374,340)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.57)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.57)




</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7103 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7103

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the Small Business Act to require Federal agencies to testify 
     and report on scores received under the scorecard program for 
 evaluating Federal agency compliance with small business contracting 
goals, to testify for failure to meet Governmentwide contracting goals, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Agency Accountability Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. FEDERAL AGENCY TESTIMONY ON SCORECARD SCORES AND FAILURE TO 
              ACHIEVE CERTAIN GOALS.

    Section 15(g)(2) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644(g)(2)) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(G) Testimony required.--The head of the office 
        established in a Federal agency under subsection (k) shall 
        testify before the Committee on Small Business and 
        Entrepreneurship of the Senate and the Committee on Small 
        Business of the House of Representatives under the following 
        circumstances:
                    ``(i) If such agency fails to receive a score 
                equivalent to a letter grade of `A' or above on the 
                scorecard established under subsection (y) for a fiscal 
                year, on the reasons for such failure.
                    ``(ii) If such agency fails to meet two or more of 
                the Governmentwide goals established under paragraph 
                (1)(A), on the reasons for such failure,''.

SEC. 3. FEDERAL AGENCY REPORTING ON SCORECARD SCORES.

    Section 15(h)(1)(D) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 
644(h)(1)(D)) is amended by inserting ``and to improve the score on the 
scorecard established under subsection (y)'' after ``better meet such 
goals''.

SEC. 4. COMPLIANCE WITH CUTGO.

    No additional amounts are authorized to be appropriated to carry 
out this Act or the amendments made by this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 29, 2024.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 7103

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend the Small Business Act to require Federal agencies to testify 
     and report on scores received under the scorecard program for 
 evaluating Federal agency compliance with small business contracting 
goals, to testify for failure to meet Governmentwide contracting goals, 
                        and for other purposes.
```
§ 20.105 Testing and research conducted by or with funds provided by the Food and Drug Administration. ( a ) Any list that may be prepared by the Food and Drug Administration of testing and research being conducted by or with funds provided by the Food and Drug Administration is available for public disclosure.
( b ) Any contract relating to agency testing and research, and any progress report relating thereto, is available for public disclosure.
( c ) The results of all testing or research conducted by or with funds provided by the Food and Drug Administration, such as toxicological testing, compliance assays, methodology studies, and product testing, are available for public disclosure when the final report is complete and accepted by the responsible Food and Drug Administration official, after deletion of any information that would reveal confidential investigative techniques and procedures, e.g., the use of “markers” to document adulteration of a product. If such results are disclosed in an authorized manner to any member of the public before the final report is available, they are immediately available for public disclosure to any member of the public who requests them.
( d ) Access to all raw data, slides, worksheets, and other similar working materials shall be provided at the same time that the final report is disclosed.
L : 1: ^•.•••r'wninliui M



# Before th e Unite d State s Departmen to fTransportatio n

Washington , D C Jun e 28 , 201 0

Essentia l Ai rServic e at : HURON , SOUT H DAKOT A unde r4 9 U.S.C
. 4173 1 et.seq
. Docke tOSf-2000-713 8

Tlii s documen tcontain s GreatLal^es Aviation , Ltd.' s respons e t o Orde rRequestin g Proposal s 2010-5-2 6 GreatLake s Aviation , Ltd
. i s please d t o submi tthi s proposa l t o provid e essentia l ai rtransportatio n t o Huron , Sout h Dakota
. GreatLakes ' proposa l intend s convenientl ytime d connectin g service s t o ou rcode-shar e partners (Unite d an d Frontier) atou rDenve rHub
. I n addition , GreatLake s maintain s interlin e ticketin g an d baggag e agreement s wit h th e majorityo fth e othe rcarriers servin g Denver , includin g interlin e e-ticketin g agreement s wit h U.S
. Ainway s an d Continenta l Airlines
. Al l o f whic h wil l offe rpassengers maxiu m acces s t o th e domesti can d internationa l ai rtransportatio n system
. Al l proposal s contemplat e th e us e o f1 9 seatBeechcraft1900 D airline requipment
. Question s an d comment s mayb e referre d to : Michae l O
. Matthew s Chie fFinancia l Office r GreatLake s Aviation , Ltd
. 102 2 AirportParkway Cheyenne , W

Y8200 1 (307 ) 432-700 00 >



## < i n

C O

w 2
. w cu ( 0 , 9 rau . Q
. 

### o

i n

c 

### "2 E 

# = 1 ( O

0 0 0 0

0 ) 

### E a . ' 3 m Q 

### o o O i
( A * c H
• o C 3 O

• a 

# 1 o 

### (/ ) 

# 2 3 I Q
. 

## 3 

# I c o 1

Q 0 ) 

### ^ 0 3 c o Q
.

o 

## 8 £ 0 ) ( 0 n i 

### ^ V) 

### 2

1
_ o o C O Q £ o C O 0 5 .TO«. ^ c C O 0 3 o E o c £ *- • 5 : 3 

### 2 

## 1 0 

### *- • t o O o i n f o T 3 < D C E •5 3 T 3 C 0 T = 

### 2 0 T 3 0 } 0

C O

_ l t o 

### 2 0

w c 

### *- • c 0 0 «t 0 

### » n



## . 2 ^ ( 0 ( 0 0 Q
. 0 0
. 

### * - c • 5 0
. 0 ) u 

## " E « ( 0

h
. <1 > n 

### E 3 

### z 0 

### ^ C D Q £ 3 0 w c 

### 2 3 X



### •< -

# Grea t Lake s Aviation , Ltd
. Annua l Compensatio n Requirement s fo rEssentia l Ai rServic e a t



## Huron , Soutl n Dakot a 98.0 % completio n facto r Departures : 1,22 7

Operatin g Revenues :

Passenger : HO N 4,75 0 psgr s a t $135.1 7 $642,05 8

Other : (a t 0.62 % o fpassenge rrevenue ) Tota l Operatin g Revenues : $3,98 1 $646,03 8 Operatin g Expenses :

Direct : Aircraf t an d Hul l Insuranc e

Fue l an d Oi l Flyin g Operation s Maintenanc e Tota l Direc t Expenses : Tota l Indirec t Expenses : Tota l Operatin g Expenses : Operatin g Los s Profi tElemen t(5.0 % o fTota l Operatin g Expenses ) Annua l Compensatio n Requirement : $338,71 0 $727,10 2 $121,82 0 $272,20 6 $1,459,83 8 $815,32 8 $2,275,16 6 

### ($1,629,128 ) $113,75 8 $1,742,88 6 Representativ e Schedul e
Flt # 514 2 512 7 512 8 510 3 Fre q

12345 6 12345 6 1234 5 7 1234 5 7 Flo w

HON-DE N DEN-HO N HON-DE N DEN-HO N one-sto p

one-sto p one-sto p one-sto p Schedul e

602-74 8 1035-135 1 1401-152 4 1850-222 9 Equi p

BE 1 BE 1 BE 1 BE 1
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 04-51432

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 Plaintiff - Appellee

 v.

RAMON SILVA-GALVAN

 Defendant - Appellant

---------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Western District of Texas, Del Rio

2:04-CR-665-ALL-WWJ

---------------------

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

IT IS ORDERED that the unopposed motion of appellee to 

vacate sentence is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the unopposed motion of appellee

to remand the case to the United States District Court for 

resentencing is GRANTED.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

July 13, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the unopposed motion of appellee 

to extend time to file appellee’s brief 14 days from the Court’s

denial of appellee’s motion to vacate and remand is DENIED as

unnecessary.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. JOSEPH JADACH, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.

Submitted May 2, 1939

Decided June 29, 1939.

Before Brogan, Chief Justice, and Justices Donges and Porter.

For the plaintiff in error, *Hyman Tulbowitz.*

For the defendant in error, *Daniel O’Regan*and *Raymond J. Otis.*

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff in error, with two others, was indicted on a charge of holding up and robbing an attendant of a gasoline station in Secaucus on May 31st, 1938. The trial took place on December 12th, 1938, in the Hudson County Court of Quarter Sessions, and the jury found the plaintiff in error, and the other two defendants, guilty as charged.

The plaintiff in error asserts that there was no evidence to connect him with the hold-up and that it was error for the trial judge to deny the motion for acquittal at the close of the state’s case. We think not.

The state proved that one John Elanagan was attending the gasoline station; that three young men drove up in a car bearing the license number H-13412; that Elanagan identified two of the men as Wylot and Giannino, joint defendants with plaintiff in error; that Elanagan was unable to identify the third young man at the driving wheel, because *580he kept his face turned from Elanagan. It was established that plaintiff in error, with the other two defendants, rented space in a garage for the identical car used in the hold-up. In a statement to police authorities by plaintiff in error, he said: “Then another night we went out for a ride and when we reached Secaucus we drove into a gasoline station and got some gas and again Wylot and Iggie took the man into the station and came out and got in and told me to drive away, and we drove home.”

These circumstances clearly raised a question of fact as to the presence of plaintiff in error at the scene of the holdup in Secaucus and as to his knowing participation therein. He did not testify, nor was there any contradiction of any of the state’s evidence. In the factual situation presented, we conclude that there was a question of fact for the jury’s determination as to the presence and unlawful participation of' plaintiff in error in the alleged offense, and that the motion for acquittal was properly denied.

Plaintiff in error makes general allegations of error in the admission of evidence and in the refusal to permit some questions on cross-examination. None of the reasons or specifications assigned as error are argued in plaintiff in error’s brief, but we have carefully examined same and conclude that there was no harmful error on the part of the trial judge in his rulings or in his charge to the jury.

The conviction and judgment under review will be affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
- - - - - - - -

NO. 20-0466 IN THE INTEREST OF J.A. & N.A., CHILDREN § § § § § § Dallas County, 5th District.

November 13, 2020 Petitioner's petition for review, filed herein in the above numbered and styled case, having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.

 I, BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas, do hereby certify that the above is a true and correct copy of the orders of the Supreme Court of Texas in the case numbered and styled as above, as the same appear of record in the minutes of said Court under the date shown. WITNESS my hand and seal of the Supreme Court of Texas, at the City of Austin, this the 22nd day of December, 2020.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk By Monica Zamarripa, Deputy Clerk
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                      SUBSIDIARIES AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
            Name                     Jurisdiction of Incorporation   Percent Ownership
            ----
<S>                                           <C>                           <C>
GolfWeb                                       California                    100%
Sports.com Limited                            United Kingdom                 38%
Commissioner.com, Inc.                        New York                      100%
VegasInsider, Inc.                            Delaware                      100%
Las Vegas Sports Consultants, Inc.            Nevada                        100%*
MVP.com Sports, Inc.                          Delaware                      100%
</TABLE>

*    Las Vegas Sports Consultants, Inc. is 100% owned by VegasInsider, Inc.
[No. 38477-5-I.

Division One.

December 1, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Brian Glendenning, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 95-1-04723-4, James A. Noe, J., entered April 1, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.