alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1





Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant To


Section
906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Hancock Fabrics, Inc. ( “Hancock”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended October 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of Jane F. Aggers,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Hancock and Robert W. Driskell,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Hancock, certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of their knowledge:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Hancock.




Date:
December 9, 2010





/s/ Jane F. AggersJane
      F. AggersPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)/s/ Robert W. DriskellRobert
      W. DriskellExecutive
      Vice President andChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)
§ 1401.22 How will ONDCP respond to my Privacy Act request? ( a ) *When will we respond to your request?* We will search to determine if the requested records exist in a system of records ONDCP owns or controls. The Office of General Counsel will respond to you in writing within 20 days after we receive your request and/or within ten working days after we receive your request for an amendment, if it meets the requirements of this subpart. We may extend the response time in unusual circumstances, such as the need to consult with another agency about a record or to retrieve a record that is in storage.
( b ) *What will our response include?* ( 1 ) Our written response will include our determination whether to grant or deny your request in whole or in part, a brief explanation of the reasons for the determination, and the amount of the fee charged, if any, under § 1401.24. If you requested access to records, we will make the records, if any, available to you. If you requested amendment of a record, the response will describe any amendments made and advise you of your right to obtain a copy of the amended record.
( 2 ) We will also notify the individual who is subject to the record in writing, if, based on your request, any system of records contains a record pertaining to him or her.
( 3 ) If ONDCP makes an adverse determination with respect to your request, our written response will identify the name and address of the person responsible for the adverse determination, that the adverse determination is not a final agency action, and describe the procedures by which you may appeal the adverse determination under § 1401.23.
( 4 ) An adverse determination is a response to a Privacy Act request that: ( i ) Withholds any requested record in whole or in part;
( ii ) Denies a request to amend a record in whole or in part;
( iii ) Declines to provide an accounting of disclosures;
( iv ) Advises that a requested record does not exist or cannot be located;
( v ) Finds that what you requested is not a record subject to the Privacy Act; or
( vi ) Advises on any disputed fee matter.
Editorial Note on Part 184
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 184 appear at 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; and 81 FR 49897, July 29, 2016.

§ 184.1307a Ferrous ascorbate. ( a ) Ferrous ascorbate (CAS Reg. No. 24808-52-4) is a reaction product of ferrous hydroxide and ascorbic acid. It is a blue-violet product containing 16 percent iron.
( b ) The ingredient must be of a purity suitable for its intended use.
( c ) In accordance with § 184.1(b)(1), the ingredient is used in food as a nutrient supplement as defined in § 170.3(o)(20) of this chapter, with no limitation other than current good manufacturing practice. The ingredient may also be used in infant formula in accordance with section 412(g) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. 350a(g)) or with regulations promulgated under section 412(a)(2) of the act (21 U.S.C. 350a(a)(2)).
( d ) Prior sanctions for this ingredient different from the uses established in this section do not exist or have been waived.
[53 FR 16865, May 12, 1988, as amended at 69 FR 24512, May 4, 2004; 73 FR 8607, Feb. 14, 2008]
<PAGE>   1
                        REDHOOK ALE BREWERY, INCORPORATED

                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,     SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
                                                                1997           1996            1997             1996
                                                             ----------     ----------     -----------      ----------
<S>                                                          <C>            <C>            <C>              <C>       
Primary and fully-diluted earnings per common share:
  Weighted average common shares outstanding ...........      7,686,440      7,641,364       7,686,019       7,639,768

  Weighted average common equivalent shares outstanding:
    Series A convertible redeemable preferred stock ....           --             --              --              --
    Series B convertible redeemable preferred stock ....      1,289,872      1,289,872            --         1,289,872
    Stock options, net .................................         34,679        227,003            --           229,845
                                                             ----------     ----------     -----------      ----------


Average number of common and
    common equivalent shares outstanding ...............      9,010,991      9,158,239       7,686,019       9,159,485
                                                             ==========     ==========     ===========      ==========

Net Income (Loss) ......................................     $   71,015     $1,167,742     $  (417,022)     $2,051,272
                                                             ==========     ==========     ===========      ==========

Net Income (Loss) per Share ............................     $     0.01     $     0.13     $     (0.05)     $     0.22
                                                             ==========     ==========     ===========      ==========
</TABLE>
[No. 40216-1-I.

Division One.

January 26, 1998.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Ryan Alex Savage, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 96-8-07240-2, Patricia Hall Clark, J. Pro Tern., entered January 23, 1997. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7184 

To provide the Congressional Budget Office with necessary authorities to 

expedite the sharing of data from executive branch agencies, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2024 

Mr. GROTHMAN (for himself, Mr. MFUME, Mr. FERGUSON, and Ms. PORTER) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To provide the Congressional Budget Office with necessary 

authorities to expedite the sharing of data from executive 

branch agencies, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Congressional Budget 

5 Office Data Access Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 7184 IH

1 SEC. 2. CONDITIONS OF DISCLOSURE FOR FEDERAL AGEN2 CY INFORMATION WITH THE CONGRES3 SIONAL BUDGET OFFICE. 

4 Subsection (b) of section 552a of title 5, United 

5 States Code (commonly known as the ‘‘Privacy Act of 

6 1974’’), is amended— 

7 (1) by redesignating paragraphs (11) and (12) 

8 as paragraphs (12) and (13), respectively; and 

9 (2) by inserting after paragraph (10) the fol10 lowing: 

11 ‘‘(11) to the Director of the Congressional 

12 Budget Office, or any authorized representative of 

13 the Director, in the course of performance of the du14 ties of the Congressional Budget Office;’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Order entered March 4, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00414-CV

MARY HELEN WILLIAMS-WHITE, Appellant

V.

HENRY M. WHITE, Appellee

On Appeal from the 59th Judicial District Court

Grayson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. FA-12-0829

ORDER

We GRANT the February 27, 2014 motion of Cindy Bardwell, Official Court Reporter 

for the 59th Judicial District Court of Grayson County, Texas, for an extension of time to file the 

reporter’s record. The reporter’s record shall be filed on or before APRIL 2, 2014. No further 

extension of time will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
<PAGE>   1
                           
                                                                  EXHIBIT 11.1  


                                 SPYGLASS, INC.
                     COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE (1)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                Year Ended September 30,
                                         ------------------------------------------
                                              1997           1996           1995
                                         ------------     -----------    ----------

<S>                                      <C>              <C>            <C>       
Net income (loss)                        ($ 9,735,000)    $ 3,460,000    $2,176,000
                                         ------------     -----------    ----------

Weighted average shares outstanding:
     Common stock                          12,090,000      11,618,800     8,272,876
     Common stock equivalents
         calculated by treasury stock
         method applied to option,
         and warrants issued (2)                    -       1,219,292     1,150,542
                                         ------------     -----------    ----------

Weighted average common shares and
    equivalents                            12,090,000      12,838,062     9,423,418
                                         ------------     -----------    ----------

Net income (loss) per share              ($      0.81)    $      0.27    $     0.23
</TABLE>


(1) - This exhibit should be read in conjunction with "Summary of Operations and
Significant Accounting Policies-Per Share Information" in Note 1 of the Notes to
the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(2) - Stock options granted prior to the beginning of each reporting period have
been included in the calculation of common stock equivalents as if they were
outstanding for the entire period (using the treasury sock method). Common stock
equivalents are not included for fiscal year 1997 as the effect of their
inclusion would be anti-dilutive.
Editorial Note on Part 184
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 184 appear at 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; and 81 FR 49897, July 29, 2016.

§ 184.1321 Corn gluten. ( a ) Corn gluten (CAS Reg. No. 66071-96-3), also known as corn gluten meal, is the principal protein component of corn endosperm. It consists mainly of zein and glutelin. Corn gluten is a byproduct of the wet milling of corn for starch. The gluten fraction is washed to remove residual water soluble proteins. Corn gluten is also produced as a byproduct during the conversion of the starch in whole or various fractions of dry milled corn to corn syrups.
( b ) The ingredient must be of a purity suitable for its intended use.
( c ) In accordance with § 184.1(b)(1), the ingredient is used in food with no limitation other than current good manufacturing practice. The affirmation of this ingredient as generally recognized as safe (GRAS) as a direct human food ingredient is based upon the following current good manufacturing practice conditions of use: ( 1 ) The ingredient is used as a nutrient supplement as defined in § 170.3(o)(20) of this chapter and a texturizer as defined in § 170.3(o)(32) of this chapter.
( 2 ) The ingredient is used in food at levels not to exceed current good manufacturing practice.
( d ) Prior sanctions for this ingredient different from the uses established in this section do not exist or have been waived.
[50 FR 8998, Mar. 6, 1985, as amended at 73 FR 8607, Feb. 14, 2008]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1048 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1048

     To amend the Exchange Rates and International Economic Policy 
Coordination Act of 1988 to clarify the definition of manipulation with 
              respect to currency, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 17, 2005

  Mr. Schumer (for himself, Mr. Graham, Ms. Stabenow, and Mr. Durbin) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
            Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Exchange Rates and International Economic Policy 
Coordination Act of 1988 to clarify the definition of manipulation with 
              respect to currency, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS RELATING TO INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL POLICY.

    (a) Bilateral Negotiations.--Section 3004(b) of the Exchange Rates 
and International Economic Policy Coordination Act of 1988 (22 U.S.C. 
5304(b)) is amended in the second sentence by striking ``(1) have 
material global account surpluses; and (2)''.
    (b) Definition of Manipulation.--Section 3006 of the Exchange Rates 
and International Economic Policy Coordination Act of 1988 (22 U.S.C. 
5306) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) Manipulation of rate of exchange.--For purposes of 
        this Act, a country shall be considered to be manipulating the 
        rate of exchange between its currency and the United States 
        dollar if there is a protracted large-scale intervention in one 
        direction in the exchange markets.''.
    (c) Report.--Section 3005(b) of the Exchange Rates and 
International Economic Policy Coordination Act of 1988 (22 U.S.C. 
5305(b)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (7);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (8) and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(9) a detailed explanation of the test the Secretary uses 
        to determine whether or not a country is manipulating the rate 
        of exchange between that country's currency and the dollar for 
        purposes of preventing effective balance of payments 
        adjustments or gaining an unfair advantage in international 
        trade.''.
                                 <all>
```
U.S. Department of the Interior

U.S. Geological Survey

March 2011

-1 to 0.25-2 to -1-3 to -2-4 to -3-5 to -4-6 to -5-10 to -6-15 to -10-20 to -15< -20

-10 

< -10

to -5

-5 to -4

-4 to -3

-3 to -2

-2 to -1

-1 to -0.5

-0.5 to -0.25

-0.25 to 0

0.25 

0 to 0.25

0 and no data

to 0.5

0.5 to 1

1 to 2

2 to 3

3 to 4

4 to 5

5 to 10

 > 10

Change (meters) Accretion Erosion Depth (meters)

uncertainty (+/- 0.5 m)

0 10 20 40 miles

0 15 30 60 kilometers

uncertainty (+/- 0.5 m)

Mississippi Alabama Georgia

G u l f o f M e x i c o

Study area

Louisiana Florida

Petit Bois

Island

Horn Island

East Ship

Island

West Ship

Island

Cat Island Dauphin Island

Dog Keys Pass

Ship Island Pass

M i s s i s s i p p i S o u n d

Horn Island Pass

Petit Bois Pass

Mobile Bay entrance

Biloxi

Gulfport

Pascagoula Bellefontaine 

Pt.

Mississippi Alabama

Round Is.

89°0'0"W 88°40'0"W 88°20'0"W

30°20'0"N 30°10'0"N

early 1900s shoreline

mid-1800s shoreline

1960s shoreline

early 1900s shoreline

2008–2009 shoreline

1960s shoreline

1960s shoreline

mid-1800s shoreline

2008–2009 shoreline

mid-1800s shoreline

Bathymetry Maps Bathymetric-Change Maps

Historical Bathymetry and Bathymetric Change in the Mississippi-Alabama Coastal Region, 1847–2009

A

B

C

D

A

B

C

D

E

89°0’0’W 88°30’0’W 88°0’0’W

30°15’0’N

89°0’0’W 88°30’0’W 88°0’0’W

30°15’0’N

89°0’0’W 88°30’0’W 88°0’0’W

30°15’0’N

89°0’0’W 88°30’0’W 88°0’0’W

30°15’0’N

89°0’0’W 88°30’0’W 88°0’0’W

30°15’0’N

89°0’0’W 88°30’0’W 88°0’0’W

30°15’0’N

89°0’0’W 88°30’0’W 88°0’0’W

30°15’0’N

89°0’0’W 88°30’0’W 88°0’0’W

30°15’0’N

89°0’0’W 88°30’0’W 88°0’0’W

30°15’0’N

Figure 1. Bathymetric grids of the Mississippi and Alabama barrier islands from 1847 to 2009. 

(Projected using the GCS NAD 83 datum.)

Figure 2. Bathymetric-change grids of the Mississippi and Alabama barrier islands from 1847 to 2009. 

(Projected using the GCS NAD 83 datum.)

Location maps for the Mississippi and Alabama 

barrier islands: Cat, Ship, Horn, Petit Bois, and 

Dauphin Islands.

Mississippi Alabama

Mississippi Alabama

Mississippi Alabama

Mississippi Alabama

Mississippi Alabama

Mississippi Alabama

Mississippi Alabama

Mississippi Alabama

Mississippi Alabama

Scientific Investigations Map 3154

By Noreen A. Buster and Robert A. Morton

Pamphlet accompanies map

N 

mid-1800s to early 1900s change

early 1900s to 1960s change

mid-1800s to 1960s change

1960s to 2008–2009 change

mid-1800s to 2008–2009 change

1847–1856

2008–2009

1960–1970

1916–1920
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.01


                              List of Subsidiaries
                             of Corixa Corporation


                              Chinook Corporation
                                 Anergen, Inc.
Exhibit 31.1



FORM 10-KSB/A CERTIFICATION



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) 
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANE-OXLEY ACT.





|I, James R. Arabia, certify that:
|---------------------------------
|                                 
|1.                               
|                                 
|2.                               
|                                 
|3.                               
|                                 
|4.                               
|                                 
|                                 
|                                 
|                                 
|                                 
|                                 
|                                 
|                                 
|                                 
|5.                               
|                                 
|                                 
|                                 
|                                 
|                                 
|                                 
|Date: February 10, 2006          
|
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Womanpower Committees During World War II: United States and British Experience

              																	United States. Women's Bureau					 and 	Morton, Gertrude B. 						*Womanpower Committees During World War II: United States and British Experience : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 244*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1953,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5515,			accessed on September 20, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6634

RAYMOND FRAZIER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

WILLIAM S. HAINES, Warden, Huttonsville

Correctional Center; MARK WILLIAMSON, Warden,

Denmar Correctional Center,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers,

District Judge. (CA-03-565-3)

Submitted: July 29, 2004 Decided: August 5, 2004

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raymond Frazier, Appellant Pro Se. Dawn Ellen Warfield, OFFICE OF

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia,

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Raymond Frazier seeks to appeal the district court’s

order dismissing as untimely his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack

v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676,

683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and

conclude that Frazier has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
#### Lewis C. Trombly, as Administrator of the Estate of Louisa Wool, Deceased, Appellant, *v.*Benton Turner et al., Defendants. The People of the State of New York, Respondent.

*Trombly*v. *Turner,*116 App. Div. 74, affirmed.

(Argued October 8, 1908;

decided October 23, 1908.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered January 23, 1907, which affirmed a judgment of Special Term directing the foreclosure of a mortgage, but excluding certain lands from the lien of the mortgage.

*G. J. Vert*for appellant.

*William 8. Jaehson, Attorney-General {George P. JDeelcer*of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.