alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 31993R0317 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31993R0317

**Council Regulation (EEC) No 317/93 of 9 February 1993 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1906/90 on certain marketing standards for poultrymeat **

*
Official Journal L 037 , 13/02/1993 P. 0008 - 0008 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 48 P. 0086 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 48 P. 0086 *

COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) No 317/93 of 9 February 1993 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1906/90 on certain marketing standards for poultrymeat

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2777/75 of 29 October 1975 on the common organization of the market in poultrymeat (1), and in particular Article 2 (2) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Whereas Regulation (EEC) No 1906/90 (2) lays down certain marketing standards for poultrymeat;

Whereas the definitions of poultrymeat contained in Regulation (EEC) No 1906/90 should be amended so as to exclude all types of poultrymeat preparations;

Whereas, in order to take due account of the conditions for poultrymeat marketing at retail trade level, Member States should be permitted to lay down specific temperature requirements for the cutting and storage of fresh poultrymeat in the retail trade,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Regulation (EEC) No 1906/90 is hereby amended as follows:

'1. "poultrymeat" means: poultrymeat suitable for human consumption, which has not undergone any treatment other than cold treatment;'

2. Article 2, point 5, shall be replaced by the following:

'5. "fresh poultrymeat" means: poultrymeat not stiffened by the cooling process, which is to be kept at a temperature not below - 2 °C and not higher than 4 °C at any time; however, Member States may fix different temperature requirements for the cutting and storage of fresh poultrymeat performed in retail shops or in premises adjacent to sales points, where the cutting and storage are performed solely for the purpose of supplying the consumer directly on the spot;'.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communites.

However, the provisions of Article 1, point 1, shall enter into force on 1 January 1994.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 February 1993.

For the Council

The President

B. WESTH

(1) OJ No L 282, 1. 11. 1975, p. 77. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1235/89 (OJ No L 128, 11. 5. 1989, p. 29).

(2) OJ No L 173, 6. 7. 1990, p. 1.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 10.5


No. 3 $ 28,881.99 (City) Fort Pierce (State) Florida , 1997 Keith Larkin, after
date, for value received, $28,881.99 promises to pay to the order of Pro Tech
Communications, Inc. twenty eight thousand eight hundred and eighty one 99/00
DOLLARS, at (City) Fort Pierce, (State) Florida, with interest thereon at the
rate of 15 per cent per annum from 8/2/97 until fully paid. Interest payable
semiannually. The maker and endorser of this note further agree to waive demand,
notice of non-payment and protest; and in case suit shall be brought for the
collection hereof, or the same has to be collected upon demand of an attorney,
to pay reasonable attorney's fees for making such collection. Deferred interest
payments to bear interest from maturity at 15 per cent per anum, payable at
anniversary.

                                                                        (Seal)
                                        ------------------------------


Due August 2, 1998                      /s/ Keith Larkin                (Seal)
                                        ------------------------------
exv10w8w1



 








EXHIBIT 10.8.1




[ARTES MEDICAL, INC. LETTERHEAD]




<<DATE>>




<PR_GIVEN_NAME> <PR_SURNAME>

<PR_STREET_ADDRESS>

<PR_LOCALITY>, <PR_STATE_OR_PROVINCE> <PR_POSTAL_CODE>




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Re: Grant of [Incentive][Nonstatutory] Stock Option
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Option Shares:
	 	 	 	 	 	Grant Date:	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Price per share:	 	 	 	 	 	Vesting Base Date:	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Fully-Vested Date:	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Option control no.:	 	Expiration Date:	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 

	 	 






Dear <PR_GIVEN_NAME>:




     I am pleased to confirm that the Company has granted you an option to purchase shares of our
common stock under the Artes Medical, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. To accept your stock
option, please sign the enclosed copy of this letter and return it to {department name,
mail-stop}{in the envelope provided}.



General terms




     Your option is intended to be [an incentive][a nonstatutory] option. The basic terms of your
option grant are identified in the information block at the top of this offer letter, but other
important terms and conditions are described in the plan. We encourage you to carefully review the
plan, a copy of which is [enclosed] [available on request from our {Stock Administrator}{Human
Resources Department}][and on the intranet at                     ].



Purchase and payment




     Subject to the plan, your option vests (becomes exercisable) in equal installments of
twenty-five percent (25%) of the Option Shares on and after each of the first four anniversaries of
the date hereof, calculated to the closest whole share, so that all shares will become
purchasable on the Fully-Vested Date shown above.



     If you decide to purchase shares under this option, you will be required to submit a completed
exercise agreement on a form approved by the Company, together with payment for the shares. You
may pay for the shares (plus any



 









 







associated withholding taxes) using cash, a check, a wire transfer or any other form of payment
listed in section 6.4(c) of the plan and permitted by the Administrator at the time you wish to
exercise. Shares available under this option must be purchased, if at all, no later than the
Expiration Date.



[Specify any other special provisions.]




We value your efforts and look forward to your continued contribution.




Sincerely,




[name]

[title]




I accept this option and agree to the terms of this offer letter and the plan.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	, 200	 	 	 	 
	 

Optionee signature

	 	 

Date
# EUR-Lex - 31991D0686 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31991D0686

**91/686/EEC: Council Decision of 11 December 1991 amending Directive 80/1095/EEC and Decision 80/1095/EEC and Decision 80/1096/EEC as regards certain measures relating to classical swine­fever **

*
Official Journal L 377 , 31/12/1991 P. 0015 - 0015 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 40 P. 0041 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 40 P. 0041 *

COUNCIL DECISION of 11 December 1991 amending Directive 80/1095/EEC and Decision 80/1096/EEC as regards certain measures relating to classical swine-fever (91/686/EEC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, and in particular Article 43 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission (1),

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (2),

Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee (3),

Whereas Directive 80/1095/EEC (4), as last amended by Directive 87/487/EEC (5), lays down conditions designed to render and keep the territory of the Community free from classical swine-fever;

Whereas Decision 80/1096/EEC (6), as last amended by Decision 87/488/EEC (7), introduced Community financial measures for the eradication of classical swine-fever;

Whereas the measures applied to eradicate classical swine-fever have gradually improved the health status of the pig population in the territory of the Community; whereas it has been possible, due to this improved status, to recognize certain areas (regions or Member States) as officially swine-fever-free or swine-fever-free;

Whereas one of the given objectives, namely to keep the territory of the Community free from classical swine-fever, has been attained in large areas; whereas it is necessary to take this situation into account and consequently amend Directive 80/1095/EEC and Directive 80/1096/EEC,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

In Article 12 (2) of Directive 80/1095/EEC the date '1 July 1993` shall be replaced by '1 July 1992`.

Article 2

The following sentence shall be added to Article 2 (1) of Decision 80/1096/EEC: 'However, participation by the Community shall be limited to measures carried out before 1 July 1992.`

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 December 1991.

For the CouncilThe PresidentP. BUKMAN

(1)OJ N° C 226, 31. 8. 1991, p. 19.

(2)OJ N° C 326, 16. 12. 1991.

(3)Opinion delivered on 28 November (not yet published in the Official Journal).

(4)OJ N° L 325, 1. 12. 1980, p. 1.

(5)OJ N° L 280, 3. 10. 1987, p. 24.

(6)OJ N° L 325, 1. 12. 1980, p. 5.

(7)OJ N° L 280, 3. 10. 1987, p. 26.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned, Kevin G. Wills, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Saks Incorporated (the
Company), has executed this certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 1, 2009 (the Report).

The undersigned hereby certifies that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 31st day of August, 2009.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Kevin G. Wills                                  
|Kevin G. Wills                                      
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Saks Incorporated
and will be retained by Saks Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MAYKEL TORRES,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-2076

[November 24, 2021]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Bernard I. Bober, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 14-009348-CF-10A.

Maykel Torres, Live Oak, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CONNER, C.J., WARNER and GROSS, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 648 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 648

Expressing support for the designation of August 3, 2018, as ``National 
                           Ernie Pyle Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 7, 2017

  Mr. Banks of Indiana submitted the following resolution; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing support for the designation of August 3, 2018, as ``National 
                           Ernie Pyle Day''.

Whereas Ernest ``Ernie'' Pyle was born on August 3, 1900, in Dana, Indiana;
Whereas Pyle studied journalism at Indiana University Bloomington before 
        becoming a reporter for The Daily Herald in La Porte, Indiana;
Whereas Pyle eventually became a roving correspondent for Scripps-Howard 
        newspapers, writing a column carried in approximately 200 newspapers;
Whereas Pyle served as a war correspondent in Britain in 1940 and covered the 
        Battle of Britain;
Whereas, following the entry of the United States into World War II in December 
        1941, Pyle covered every major American campaign in the European 
        theater, including in North Africa, Sicily, Italy, and France;
Whereas war reporting by Pyle during World War II consistently celebrated the 
        sacrifices, courage, and determination of the common soldier (commonly 
        known as a ``grunt'') of the United States;
Whereas Pyle lived and worked among the soldiers of the United States and shared 
        in the toils, endeavors, and challenges of those soldiers, including 
        facing enemy fire;
Whereas Pyle received the Pulitzer Prize in 1944 ``for distinguished war 
        correspondence during the year 1943''; and
Whereas Pyle, while traveling with soldiers of the United States that were 
        fighting on the Japanese island of Ie Shima during the Okinawa campaign, 
        was killed by Japanese machine gun fire on April 18, 1945: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the designation of ``National Ernie Pyle 
        Day'';
            (2) recognizes contributions made by Ernie Pyle to 
        journalism in the United States; and
            (3) celebrates the legacy of Ernie Pyle as one of the most 
        respected and beloved war correspondents in the history of the 
        United States.
                                 <all>
```
38474.

#### CLOSE *et al.*v. MATSON.

Carlisle, Judge.

1. The petition in this case, the same purporting to be an action for damages against Close and others alleged to have been joint tortfeasors, after setting forth the way and manner in which it is claimed Close’s codefendant injured and damaged the plaintiff, and the nature and extent of the plaintiff’s injuries, then purports to set forth the way and manner in which it is contended that Close injured and damaged the plaintiff, and as to these injuries it merely alleges that such acts on the part of Close caused “further injury to plaintiff.” There are no other allegations in the petition setting forth the nature and extent of the plaintiff’s injuries claimed to have been inflicted by the defendant Close. The bare allegation that the defendant Close’s actions inflicted “further injury to plaintiff,” is a bare conclusion unsupported by any facts alleged and is insufficient to support the cause of action against him. *Hearn v. Gower,*1 Ga. App. 265 (2) (57 S. E. 916); Hodgins v. Bingham, 126 N.Y.S. 493 (1) (N. Y. Supreme Court, Appellate Div.). The trial court erred in overruling the general demurrers of the defendant Kenneth Close and of his wife, Mrs. Olga R. Close, who was sued as the owner of the family-purpose automobile being operated by Mr. Close. Such allegations as to the dam*664ages inflicted by Close were wholly insufficient to show that the plaintiff was injured and damaged to any extent by the negligent acts of the defendant Close alleged in the petition.

Decided October 27, 1960.

*J. Walter LeCraw,*for plaintiffs in error.

*James M. McDaniel, Greer, Henning & Morris,*contra.

2. The petition in this case alleges that the car of the codefendant, Rape, collided with the rear of the plaintiffs automobile inflicting certain injuries upon her, and that immediately thereafter the automobile driven by the defendant Close collided with the rear of Rape’s car and knocked it into the rear of the plaintiff’s automobile inflicting further injury on the plaintiff. These allegations make a case of two separate and distinct torts inflicted upon the plaintiff in close proximity of time and space, but they do not show a concert of action on the part of Rape and Close, nor a single injury resulting from their separate acts, but the allegations show two separate and distinct torts inflicting separate and distinct injuries. Under such circumstances, the defendants named in the petition were not joint tortfeasors and could not be sued as such in one action, and the trial judge erred in overruling the special demurrer which properly raised the issue as to misjoinder of parties defendant. *Longino v. Moore,*53 Ga. App. 674 (187 S. E. 203); 86 C. J. S. 951, Torts, § 35, and 953, § 37. The plaintiff, therefore, should be afforded an opportunity, if he so desires, to amend his petitition and to select which of the defendants he chooses to proceed against in this action.

*Judgment reversed with direction.*

*Townsend, P. J., and Frankum, J., concur.*
Editorial Note on Part 14
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 14 appear at 88 FR 45065, July 14, 2023.

§ 14.130 Conduct of TEPRSSC meeting; availability of TEPRSSC records. ( a ) In accordance with 21 U.S.C. 360kk(f)(1)(B), all proceedings of TEPRSSC are recorded, and the record of each proceeding is available for public inspection.
( b ) All proceedings of TEPRSSC are open except when the Commissioner has determined, under § 14.27, that a portion of a meeting may be closed.
[44 FR 22351, Apr. 13, 1979, as amended at 78 FR 17087, Mar. 20, 2013]
Exhibit 32.2


               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


 In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Health Group Corp. (the
 "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with
 the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
 I, William R. McManaman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby
 certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
 Company.


 /s/ William R. McManaman

 William R. McManaman
 Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 May 10, 2004
§ 910.127 Legal authority and effect. ( a ) A DOE financial assistance award is valid only if it is in writing and is signed, either in writing or electronically, by a DOE Contracting Officer.
( b ) Recipients are free to accept or reject the award. A request to draw down DOE funds constitutes the Recipient's acceptance of the terms and conditions of this Award.
[80 FR 57511, Sept. 24, 2015]
Memorandum

To: Four Corners Pow~~Plant Permit File, NN 14-01 and T-002-NN

From: Lisa Beckham

Date: 7/9/2014

Re: Summary of June 16, 2014 Teleconference with Applicant

On June 16, 2014 the EPA, Region 9 had a teleconference with Arizona Public Service Company

(APS) to discuss the April 2014 FCPP PSD permit application.

Attendees:

Lisa Beckham, EPA Region 9

Gerardo Rios, EPA Region 9

Ann Lyons, Counsel for EPA Region 9

Colleen McKaughan, EPA Region 9

Michael Kafka, Counsel for APS

Charles Spell, APS

Mark Hajduk,APS

During the call EPA identified outstanding issues related to the application that needed to be

addressed before the application could be determined complete. EPA agreed to follow up the

call with a letter addressing the outstanding issues. That letter is part of the administrative

record and is dated June 18, 2014.
§ 182.3149 Ascorbyl palmitate. ( a ) *Product.* Ascorbyl palmitate.
( b ) *Conditions of use.* This substance is generally recognized as safe when used in accordance with good manufacturing practice.
Editorial Note on Part 172
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 172 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; 70 FR 72074, Dec. 1, 2005; and 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 172.735 Glycerol ester of rosin. Glycerol ester of wood rosin, gum rosin, or tall oil rosin may be safely used in food in accordance with the following prescribed conditions: ( a ) It has an acid number of 3 to 9, a drop-softening point of 88 to 96 °C; and a color of N or paler as determined in accordance with Official Naval Stores Standards of the United States. It is purified by countercurrent steam distillation or steam stripping.
( b ) It is used to adjust the density of citrus oils used in the preparation of beverages whereby the amount of the additive does not exceed 100 parts per million of the finished beverage.
[42 FR 14491, Mar. 15, 1977, as amended at 70 FR 15758, Mar. 29, 2005; 72 FR 46896, Aug. 22, 2007]
SHAREN WILSON

. Criminal District Attorney
Tarrant County
July 13 , 2015

Hon. Abel Acosta , Clerk Texas Court of Criminal Appeals

Re: Ex parte Rodney Elnesto Smiley , Nos. WR

- 31,454

- 03; C- 213

- 010293

- 1011284 -B.

Dear Hon. Acosta :

On April 29, 2015, this Court invited Tarrant County (“the State”)

to brief two issues in the above case. The brief, if filed, was ordered due

by June 29, 2015.

On June 29, 2015, the State requested a two week extension for

which to file a brief . The State’s brief is currently due today, July 13,

2015.

After the State requested the extension, and indicated its desire to

file a State’s brief, the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (“TDCJ”)

filed a brief. TDCJ’s brief sufficiently addresses the Court ’s questions

and the State has nothing to add . Therefore, the State will be filing WR-31,454-03 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 7/13/2015 10:16:44 AM Accepted 7/13/2015 11:38:16 AM

ABEL ACOSTA CLERKnothing further unless directed by the Court

.
Based on everything already filed, t he State prays that this Court

dismiss the application of Rodney Elnesto Smiley as moot or, in the

alternative, deny him relief.

Respectfully submitted,

SHAREN WILSON Criminal District Attorney Tarrant County, Texas /s/ Andréa Jacobs

_______ DEBRA WINDSOR, Assistant ANDRÉA JACOBS , Assistant Criminal District Attorney Criminal District Attorney Chief, Post

- Conviction State Bar No. 24037596 401 W. Belknap Street Fort Worth, Texas 76196

- 0201 (817) 884

- 1687 FAX (817) 884

- 1672 coaappellatealerts@tar rantcounty.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A true copy of the State’s letter has been sent, via electronic mail,

to Smiley’s attorney, Hon. Kenneth Nash, at Ken.Nash@tdcj.texas.gov

and TDCJ’s attorney, Hon. Joseph Corcoran, at

Joseph.Corcoran@TexasAttorneyGeneral.gov on this 13 th day of July

2015.

/s/ Andréa Jacobs ANDRÉA JACOBS