Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 37 / Thursday, February 25, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 8493 

■ 2. Revise § 165.814(a)(5) to read as 

follows: § 165.814 Security Zones; 

Captain of the Port Houston-Galveston 

Zone. 

(a) * * * 

(5) Freeport, Texas. (i) The Dow Barge 

Canal, containing all waters of the Dow 

Barge Canal north of a line drawn 

between 28°56.81′ N/095°18.33′ W and 

28°56.63′ N/095°18.54′ W (NAD 1983). 

(ii) The Brazos Harbor, containing all 

waters west of a line drawn between 

28°56.45′ N, 095°20.00′ W, and 

28°56.15′ N, 095°20.00′ W (NAD 1983) 

at its junction with the Old Brazos 

River. 

(iii) The Dow Chemical plant, 

containing all waters of the Brazos Point 

Turning Basin within 100′ of the north 

shore and bounded on the east by the 

longitude line drawn through 28°56.58′ 

N/095°18.64′ W and on the west by the 

longitude line drawn through 28°56.64′ 

N/095°19.13′ W (NAD 1983). 

(iv) The Seaway Teppco Facility, 

containing all waters of the Brazos Port 

Turning Basin bounded on the south by 

the shore, the north by the Federal 

Channel, on the east by the longitude 

line running through 28°56.44′ N, 

095°18.83′ W and 28°56.48′ N 

095°18.83′ W and on the West by the 

longitude line running through 

28°56.12′ N, 095°19.27′ W and 28°56.11′ 

N, 095°19.34′ W (NAD 1983). 

(v) The Conoco Phillips Facility 

docks, containing all waters within 100′ 

of a line drawn from a point on shore 

at Latitude 28°55.96′ N, Longitude 

095°19.77′ W, extending west to a point 

on shore at Latitude 28°56.19′ N, 

Longitude 095°20.07′ W (NAD 1983). 

* * * * * 

Dated: January 7, 2010. 

M.E. Woodring, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port Houston-Galveston. 

[FR Doc. 2010–3814 Filed 2–24–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R03–OAR–2009–0871; FRL–9116–1] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; Virginia; 

Revisions to the Definition of Volatile 

Organic Compound and Other Terms 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final 

action to approve revisions to the 

Virginia State Implementation Plan 

(SIP). The revisions amend the wording 

of 22 definitions, including the 

definition of Volatile Organic 

Compound (VOC). EPA is approving 

these revisions to Virginia’s definitions 

in accordance with the requirements of 

the Clean Air Act (CAA). 

DATES: This rule is effective on April 26, 

2010 without further notice, unless EPA 

receives adverse written comment by 

March 29, 2010. If EPA receives such 

comments, it will publish a timely 

withdrawal of the direct final rule in the 

Federal Register and inform the public 

that the rule will not take effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID Number EPA– 

R03–OAR–2009–0871 by one of the 

following methods: 

A. www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

B. E-mail: frankford.harold@epa.gov. 

C. Mail: EPA–R03–OAR–2009–0871, 

Harold A. Frankford, Air Protection 

Division, Mailcode 3AP00, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region III, 1650 Arch Street, 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. 

D. Hand Delivery: At the previouslylisted EPA Region III address. Such 

deliveries are only accepted during the 

Docket’s normal hours of operation, and 

special arrangements should be made 

for deliveries of boxed information. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R03–OAR–2009– 

0871. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change, and may be 

made available online at 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through www.regulations.gov 

or e-mail. The www.regulations.gov Web 

site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, 

which means EPA will not know your 

identity or contact information unless 

you provide it in the body of your 

comment. If you send an e-mail 

comment directly to EPA without going 

through www.regulations.gov, your email address will be automatically 

captured and included as part of the 

comment that is placed in the public 

docket and made available on the 

Internet. If you submit an electronic 

comment, EPA recommends that you 

include your name and other contact 

information in the body of your 

comment and with any disk or CD–ROM 

you submit. If EPA cannot read your 

comment due to technical difficulties 

and cannot contact you for clarification, 

EPA may not be able to consider your 

comment. Electronic files should avoid 

the use of special characters, any form 

of encryption, and be free of any defects 

or viruses. 

Docket: All documents in the 

electronic docket are listed in the 

www.regulations.gov index. Although 

listed in the index, some information is 

not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Certain other 

material, such as copyrighted material, 

is not placed on the Internet and will be 

publicly available only in hard copy 

form. Publicly available docket 

materials are available either 

electronically in www.regulations.gov or 

in hard copy during normal business 

hours at the Air Protection Division, 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region III, 1650 Arch Street, 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. 

Copies of the State submittal are 

available at the Virginia Department of 

Environmental Quality, 629 East Main 

Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Harold A. Frankford, (215) 814–2108, or 

by e-mail at frankford.harold@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

Throughout this document, whenever 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean 

EPA. On October 6, 2009, the 

Commonwealth of Virginia submitted a 

formal revision to its State 

Implementation Plan (SIP). The SIP 

revision consists of amendments to 22 

definitions listed in 9VAC5 Chapter 10 

(General Definitions), Regulation 5–10– 

20 (Terms defined). The amended terms 

are: 

Ambient air quality standard, Criteria 

pollutant, Dispersion technique, 

Emission limitation, Emission standard, 

Excessive concentration, Federal Clean 

Air Act, Federally enforceable, Good 

engineering practice, Initial emission 

test, Initial performance test, Public 

hearing, Reference method, Regulations 

for the Control and Abatement of Air 

Pollution, Reid vapor pressure, Run, 

Standard of performance, State 

enforceable, These regulations, True 

vapor pressure, Vapor pressure, and 

Volatile organic compound. 

II. Summary of SIP Revision 

Virginia amended the definition of 

‘‘Volatile organic compound’’ to add the 

organic compound (1)1,1,1,2,2,3,4,5,5,5- 

decafluoro-3-methoxy-4- 

trifluoromethyl-pentane (HFE–7300) to 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
8494 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 37 / Thursday, February 25, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 

the list of excluded compounds. The 

exclusion of this compound is 

consistent with the list of excluded 

compounds found in EPA’s definition of 

‘‘Volatile organic compounds (VOC)’’ at 

40 CFR 51.100(s)(1). 

Virginia amended the 21 additional 

terms to be consistent with the format 

of Commonwealth regulations as 

prescribed by the Commonwealth’s 

Registrar of Regulations. The 

amendments are administrative in 

nature and do not alter the meaning or 

intent of these defined terms. 

III. General Information Pertaining to 

Submittals From the Commonwealth of 

Virginia 

In 1995, Virginia adopted legislation 

that provides, subject to certain 

conditions, for an environmental 

assessment (audit) ‘‘privilege’’ for 

voluntary compliance evaluations 

performed by a regulated entity. The 

legislation further addresses the relative 

burden of proof for parties either 

asserting the privilege or seeking 

disclosure of documents for which the 

privilege is claimed. Virginia’s 

legislation also provides, subject to 

certain conditions, for a penalty waiver 

for violations of environmental laws 

when a regulated entity discovers such 

violations pursuant to a voluntary 

compliance evaluation and voluntarily 

discloses such violations to the 

Commonwealth and takes prompt and 

appropriate measures to remedy the 

violations. Virginia’s Voluntary 

Environmental Assessment Privilege 

Law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1–1198, provides 

a privilege that protects from disclosure 

documents and information about the 

content of those documents that are the 

product of a voluntary environmental 

assessment. The Privilege Law does not 

extend to documents or information (1) 

that are generated or developed before 

the commencement of a voluntary 

environmental assessment; (2) that are 

prepared independently of the 

assessment process; (3) that demonstrate 

a clear, imminent and substantial 

danger to the public health or 

environment; or (4) that are required by 

law. 

On January 12, 1998, the 

Commonwealth of Virginia Office of the 

Attorney General provided a legal 

opinion that states that the Privilege 

Law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1–1198, 

precludes granting a privilege to 

documents and information ‘‘required 

by law,’’ including documents and 

information ‘‘required by Federal law to 

maintain program delegation, 

authorization or approval,’’ since 

Virginia must ‘‘enforce Federally 

authorized environmental programs in a 

manner that is no less stringent than 

their Federal counterparts * * *.’’ The 

opinion concludes that ‘‘[r]egarding 

§ 10.1–1198, therefore, documents or 

other information needed for civil or 

criminal enforcement under one of these 

programs could not be privileged 

because such documents and 

information are essential to pursuing 

enforcement in a manner required by 

Federal law to maintain program 

delegation, authorization or approval.’’ 

Virginia’s Immunity law, Va. Code 

Sec. 10.1–1199, provides that ‘‘[t]o the 

extent consistent with requirements 

imposed by Federal law,’’ any person 

making a voluntary disclosure of 

information to a state agency regarding 

a violation of an environmental statute, 

regulation, permit, or administrative 

order is granted immunity from 

administrative or civil penalty. The 

Attorney General’s January 12, 1998 

opinion states that the quoted language 

renders this statute inapplicable to 

enforcement of any Federally authorized 

programs, since ‘‘no immunity could be 

afforded from administrative, civil, or 

criminal penalties because granting 

such immunity would not be consistent 

with Federal law, which is one of the 

criteria for immunity.’’ 

Therefore, EPA has determined that 

Virginia’s Privilege and Immunity 

statutes will not preclude the 

Commonwealth from enforcing its 

program consistent with the Federal 

requirements. In any event, because 

EPA has also determined that a state 

audit privilege and immunity law can 

affect only state enforcement and cannot 

have any impact on Federal 

enforcement authorities, EPA may at 

any time invoke its authority under the 

CAA, including, for example, sections 

113, 167, 205, 211 or 213, to enforce the 

requirements or prohibitions of the state 

plan, independently of any state 

enforcement effort. In addition, citizen 

enforcement under section 304 of the 

CAA is likewise unaffected by this, or 

any, state audit privilege or immunity 

law. 

IV. Final Action 

EPA is approving the amendments to 

Virginia Regulation 9VAC5–10–20 

(Terms defined) as a revision to the 

Virginia State Implementation Plan. 

EPA is publishing this rule without 

prior proposal because the Agency 

views this as a noncontroversial 

amendment and anticipates no adverse 

comment. 

However, in the ‘‘Proposed Rules’’ 

section of today’s Federal Register, EPA 

is publishing a separate document that 

will serve as the proposal to approve the 

SIP revision if adverse comments are 

filed. This rule will be effective on April 

26, 2010 without further notice unless 

EPA receives adverse comment by 

March 29, 2010. If EPA receives adverse 

comment, EPA will publish a timely 

withdrawal in the Federal Register 

informing the public that the rule will 

not take effect. EPA will address all 

public comments in a subsequent final 

rule based on the proposed rule. EPA 

will not institute a second comment 

period on this action. Any parties 

interested in commenting must do so at 

this time. 

V. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

A. General Requirements 

Under the Clean Air Act, the 

Administrator is required to approve a 

SIP submission that complies with the 

provisions of the Act and applicable 

Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 

40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP 

submissions, EPA’s role is to approve 

state choices, provided that they meet 

the criteria of the Clean Air Act. 

Accordingly, this action merely 

approves state law as meeting Federal 

requirements and does not impose 

additional requirements beyond those 

imposed by state law. For that reason, 

this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 37 / Thursday, February 25, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 8495 

be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; 

and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this rule does not have 

tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the state, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on tribal governments or preempt 

tribal law. 

B. Submission to Congress and the 

Comptroller General 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

C. Petitions for Judicial Review 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean 

Air Act, petitions for judicial review of 

this action must be filed in the United 

States Court of Appeals for the 

appropriate circuit by April 26, 2010. 

Filing a petition for reconsideration by 

the Administrator of this final rule does 

not affect the finality of this action for 

the purposes of judicial review nor does 

it extend the time within which a 

petition for judicial review may be filed, 

and shall not postpone the effectiveness 

of such rule or action. Parties with 

objections to this direct final rule are 

encouraged to file a comment in 

response to the parallel notice of 

proposed rulemaking for this action 

published in the proposed rules section 

of today’s Federal Register, rather than 

file an immediate petition for judicial 

review of this direct final rule, so that 

EPA can withdraw this direct final rule 

and address the comment in the 

proposed rulemaking. This action to 

approve 22 amended terms in Virginia’s 

General Definitions regulation as a 

revision to the Virginia SIP may not be 

challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 

Incorporation by reference, 

Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen 

dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

Dated: February 1, 2010. 

William C. Early, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region III. 

■ 40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: 

PART 52—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority for citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart VV—Virginia 

■ 2. In § 52.2420, the table in paragraph 

(c) is amended by revising the sixth 

entry for 5–10–20 to read as follows: 

§ 52.2420 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

State 

citation Title/subject 

State 

effective 

date 

EPA approval date Explanation [former SIP citation] 

9 VAC 5, 

Chapter 10.

General Definitions [Part I] 

* * * * * * * 

5–10–20 ........ Terms Defined 4/2/09 2/25/10 [Insert page number where the document begins].Revised definitions of Ambient air quality standard, 

Criteria pollutant, Dispersion technique, Emission 

limitation, Emission standard, Excessive concentration, Federal Clean Air Act, Federally enforceable, Good engineering practice, Initial 

emission test, Initial performance test, Public 

hearing, Reference method, Regulations for the 

Control and Abatement of Air Pollution, Reid 

vapor pressure, Run, Standard of performance, 

State enforceable, These regulations, True vapor 

pressure, Vapor pressure, and Volatile organic 

compound. 

* * * * * * * 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
8496 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 37 / Thursday, February 25, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2010–3509 Filed 2–24–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R05–OAR–2004–OH–0004; FRL– 

9107–4] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; Ohio New 

Source Review Rules 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is approving revisions to 

the prevention of significant 

deterioration (PSD) and nonattainment 

new source review (NSR) construction 

permit programs to the Ohio State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) based on the 

State’s November 15, 2005, letter. The 

Ohio Environmental Protection Agency 

(OEPA) is seeking approval of its rules 

to implement the NSR Reform 

provisions that were not vacated by the 

United States Court of Appeals for the 

District of Columbia (DC Circuit) in New 

York v. EPA. EPA proposed approval of 

these rules on May 11, 2005 and 

received adverse comments. In this 

action, EPA responds to these comments 

and announces EPA’s final rulemaking 

action. This action affects major 

stationary sources in Ohio that are 

subject to or potentially subject to the 

PSD and NSR construction permit 

programs. 

DATES: This final rule is effective on 

March 29, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket ID 

No. EPA–R05–OAR–2004–OH–0004. All 

documents in the docket are listed on 

the http://www.regulations.gov Web 

site. Although listed in the index, some 

information is not publicly available, 

i.e., Confidential Business Information 

(CBI) or other information whose 

disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, is not placed on 

the Internet and will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available either electronically through 

http://www.regulations.gov or in hard 

copy at the Environmental Protection 

Agency, Region 5, Air and Radiation 

Division, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 

Chicago, Illinois 60604. This facility is 

open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, excluding 

Federal holidays. We recommend that 

you telephone Genevieve Damico, 

Environmental Engineer, at (312) 353– 

4761 before visiting the Region 5 office. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Genevieve Damico, Environmental 

Engineer, Air Permit Section, Air 

Programs Branch (AR–18J), EPA Region 

5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 

Illinois 60604, (312) 353–4761, 

damico.genevieve@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document whenever 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean 

EPA. This supplementary information 

section is arranged as follows: 

I. What Is Being Addressed by This 

Document? 

II. What Sections of Ohio’s Rules Are We 

Approving in Today’s Action? 

III. How Has This Rulemaking Been Affected 

by the June 24, 2005 DC Circuit Court of 

Appeals? 

IV. What Are EPA’s Responses to Adverse 

Comments? 

V. What Action Is EPA Taking Today? 

VI. Statutory and Executive Order Review 

I. What Is Being Addressed by This 

Document? 

We are partially approving revisions 

to the PSD and nonattainment NSR 

construction permit programs of the 

State of Ohio. EPA fully approved 

Ohio’s nonattainment NSR program on 

January 10, 2003 (68 FR 1366). EPA 

fully approved Ohio’s PSD program on 

January 22, 2003 (68 FR 2909). 

On December 31, 2002, EPA 

published revisions to the Federal PSD 

and NSR regulations in 40 CFR Parts 51 

and 52 (67 FR 80186). These revisions 

are commonly referred to as ‘‘NSR 

Reform’’ regulations and became 

effective on March 3, 2003. These 

regulatory revisions include provisions 

for baseline emissions determinations, 

actual-to-future actual methodology, 

plantwide applicability limits (PALs), 

clean units, and pollution control 

projects (PCPs). As stated in the 

December 31, 2002, EPA rulemaking, 

State and local permitting agencies must 

adopt and submit revisions to their part 

51 permitting programs implementing 

the minimum program elements of that 

rulemaking no later than January 2, 

2006 (67 FR 80240). OEPA submitted 

these regulatory revisions for parallel 

processing on September 14, 2004, 

which was prior to final adoption of the 

State rules. Ohio adopted the final rules 

on October 28, 2004. EPA proposed 

conditional approval of these rules on 

May 11, 2005 (70 FR 24734). On June 

24, 2005, the United States Court of 

Appeals for the District of Columbia 

Circuit issued its ruling on challenges to 

the December 2002 NSR reform 

revisions. New York v. EPA, 413 F.3d 3 

(DC Cir. 2005). Although the court did 

uphold most of EPA’s rules, it vacated 

both the clean unit and the PCP 

provisions. As a result of this court 

ruling, OEPA submitted a letter to EPA 

on November 15, 2005, amending its 

request for approval of Ohio’s rule. 

Specifically, Ohio withdrew its request 

for approval of the clean units and PCP 

portions of the Ohio rules. 

II. What Sections of Ohio’s Rules Are 

We Approving in Today’s Action? 

Ohio Administrative Code (OAC) 3745– 

31–01 Definitions 

Definitions Unchanged From Proposal 

In accordance with the May 11, 2005 

proposal, EPA is approving the 

definitions for actual emissions, actuals 

PAL, baseline actual emissions, baseline 

concentration, best available control 

technology, continuous emission 

monitoring system, continuous 

emissions rate monitoring system, 

continuous parameter monitoring 

system, emission unit, lowest 

achievable emission rate, major source 

baseline date, major stationary source, 

minor source baseline, new source 

review project, nonattainment or 

nonattaiment area, nonattainment new 

source review permit, PAL allowable 

emissions, PAL effective date, PAL 

effective period, PAL major emissions 

unit, PAL major modification, PAL 

permit, PAL pollutant, PAL significant 

emissions unit, PAL small emissions 

unit, particulate matter, particulate 

matter emissions, plantwide 

applicability limit, PM10, PM10 

emissions, total suspended particulate, 

pollution prevention, predictive 

emissions monitoring system, 

prevention of significant deterioration 

increment, prevention of significant 

deterioration permit, projected actual 

emission, regulated NSR pollutant, 

replacement unit, representative actual 

annual emissions, significant emissions 

increase, and stationary source in OAC 

3745–31–01(C), (D), (O), (Q), (S), (EE), 

(FF), (GG), (MM), (FFF), (JJJ), (KKK), 

(NNN), (UUU), (VVV), (WWW), (CCCC), 

(DDDD), (EEEE), (FFFF), (GGGG), 

(HHHH), (IIII), (JJJJ), (KKKK), (LLLL), 

(MMMM), (OOOO), (PPPP), (QQQQ), 

(UUUUU), (SSSS), (VVVV), (WWWW), 

(XXXX), (ZZZZ), (DDDDD), (EEEEE), 

(KKKKK), (LLLLL), and (PPPPP) 

respectively. EPA is also approving the 

definitions in OAC 3745–31–01, the 

non-40 CFR 51.166 and 51.165 

definitions in OAC 3745–31–01 (E), (J), 

(M), (X), (JJ), (QQ), (DDD), (EEE), (XXX), 

(HHHHH), and (XXXXX) and the minor 

revisions to the definitions for ‘‘available 

information’’, ‘‘baseline area’’, ‘‘baseline 

concentration’’, ‘‘best available 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES