alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7208 

To reauthorize the Traumatic Brain Injury program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2024 

Mr. PASCRELL (for himself and Mr. BACON) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Traumatic Brain Injury program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Traumatic Brain In5 jury Program Reauthorization Act of 2024’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PREVENTION AND CONTROL OF INJURIES. 

7 Section 394A(b) of the Public Health Service Act (42 

8 U.S.C. 280b–3(b)) is amended by striking ‘‘2020 through 

9 2024’’ and inserting ‘‘2025 through 2029’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 7208 IH

1 SEC. 3. STATE GRANTS FOR PROJECTS REGARDING TRAU2 MATIC BRAIN INJURY. 

3 Section 1252(i) of the Public Health Service Act (42 

4 U.S.C. 300d–52(i)) is amended by striking ‘‘2020 through 

5 2024’’ and inserting ‘‘2025 through 2029’’. 

6 SEC. 4. STATE GRANTS FOR PROTECTION AND ADVOCACY 

7 SERVICES. 

8 Section 1253(l) of the Public Health Service Act (42 

9 U.S.C. 300d–53(l)) is amended by striking ‘‘2020 through 

10 2024’’ and inserting ‘‘2025 through 2029’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Editorial Note on Part 172
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 172 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; 70 FR 72074, Dec. 1, 2005; and 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 172.235 Morpholine. Morpholine may be safely used as a component of food, subject to the following restrictions. ( a ) It is used as the salt(s) of one or more of the fatty acids meeting the requirements of § 172.860, as a component of protective coatings applied to fresh fruits and vegetables.
( b ) It is used at a level not in excess of that reasonably required to produce its intended effect.
Wearable Smart Chemical Sensor:

Morphix Technologies

Contact Us: SandT.Innovation@hq.dhs.gov scitech.dhs.gov dhsscitech 10-2020

RELIABLE, WEARABLE CHEMICAL 

DETECTION FOR FIRST RESPONDERS 

A recent Department of Justice sponsored study “Assessment 

of Portable HAZMAT Sensors for First Responders” concluded 

that “there does not exist a commercial off-the-shelf device that 

meets the first responder needs in full. This effort has not been 

able to identify any commercially available equipment that is 

unobtrusive and able to detect a wide range of gases.” 

First responders under duress need a simple, low-cost, rugged 

device which can detect the presence of harmful levels of 

Toxic Industrial Chemicals (TICs) with high fidelity while 

avoiding nuisance levels of TICs and false alarms due to 

ubiquitous environmental contaminants (e.g. smoke, diesel 

exhaust).

DEVELOPMENT OF A FIELD-ABLE 

CHEMICAL DETECTION DEVICE PROTOTYPE

This program is directed toward the development and 

demonstration of a wearable chemical detection badge 

capable of detecting and alarming (through visual and

audible/vibratory cues) in the presence of relevant 

concentrations of TICs. The proposed wearable badge 

consists of a reusable detection device and a consumable 

colorimetric sensor that will be inserted in the reusable device. 

Morphix Technologies is designing and developing this 

detection system in collaboration with Pergamon Corporation. 

SAVING LIVES WITH SIMPLE, RUGGED 

CHEMICAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY

The technology under development will warn first responders 

of the presence of dangerous levels of TICs (1/2 IDLH/ 

~AEGL-2 alarm threshold) in the field under harsh 

environmental conditions and in the presence of environmental 

contaminants. This low-cost, robust capability will facilitate 

effective missions while protecting the first responder from 

dangerous chemical threats. The detection technology is 

forward adaptable to additional chemical threats of interest.

ACCOMPLISHMENTS TO DATE 

 Demonstrated Phase I proof-of-concept chlorine sensor 

under harsh environmental conditions and in the presence 

of environmental contaminants

 Developed Phase II proof-of-concept sensors: further 

refined second round prototypes to ensure proper 

operation of switching voltage regulator received from 

Pergamon, worked with Pergamon to resolve the 

switching voltage regulator issue, and completed 

environmental conditions testing with second round device 

prototypes

UPCOMING MILESTONES 

 Operational Field Testing through the Naval 

Research Laboratory, Fall 2020

 Future efforts will be directed toward the 

development of class sensors to indicate a broad 

range of chemicals, thus providing increased 

protection

PERFORMERS/PARTNERS

Federal, state, and local first responders, Pergamon Corp.

Wearable Chemical Detection Badge 

Sensor Coupon

Wearable Chemical Detection Badge concept
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 13

- 00803

- CV

Denise MCVEA

, Appellant

v.

James Michael KISSLER

, Appellee

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- CI

- 14927

Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE

, JUSTICE ANGELINI , AND JUSTICE MARION

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. Costs of

the appeal are taxed against appellant.

SIGNED August 6, 2014.

_________________________________ Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      21,525,359
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,533,706
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                126,656,388
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      26,875,254
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,051,849
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             181,346,079
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     80,965,706
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        63,117
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,792,047
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               181,346,079
<SALES>                                     17,304,362
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            23,675,477
<CGS>                                       13,297,818
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               25,470,396
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,130,735
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,837,860
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,925,654)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,672,938)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,672,938)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.06)
<FN>
<F1>CASH INCLUDES RESTRICTED CASH AND INVESTMENTS OF $19,564,069.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 6, 2020

No. 04-20-00124-CV

Billy STONE dba Stobil Enterprise and All Occupants,

Appellants

v.

K CLARK PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020CV00366

Honorable J. Frank Davis, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with the court’s opinion of this date, K Clark Property Management LLC’s 

motion to dismiss is GRANTED and this appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF 

JURISDICTION. 

We order that no costs be assessed against appellants Billy Stone dba Stobil Enterprise and 

All Occupants because they are indigent. 

It is so ORDERED on May 6, 2020.

_____________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 6th day of May, 2020.

_____________________________

Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court
§ 182.3013 Ascorbic acid. ( a ) *Product.* Ascorbic acid.
( b ) *Conditions of use.* This substance is generally recognized as safe when used in accordance with good manufacturing practice.
[No. 20658-7-II.

Division Two.

November 7, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. James Howard McCormack, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 95-1-04641-1, Bruce W. Cohoe, J., entered April 29, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Seinfeld, J., concurred in by Morgan and Hunt, JJ.
Law Offices of 

Celestino Pena 

Brickell Harbour 12-D 

200 S.E. 15th. Road 

Miami, Florida 33129 

305 –856-5655 

cpmiami@mac.com

December 4, 2014

VIA E-Mail

Mr. Paul L. Gretch

Director, Office of International Aviation

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.

Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Application of Aerotransportes Mas de Carga, S.A. de C.V. for Statement of 

Authorization (Permit to display NORTHERN AIR CARGO, INC.’s designator code)

DOCKET DOT-OST-2014-0212

Dear Mr. Gretch:

Kindly be advised that Aerotransportes Mas de Carga, S.A. de C.V. (“MAS”) is 

hereby withdrawing its Application for a statement of authorization, dated November 25, 

2014, in Docket DOT-OST-2014-0212, in which it had requested permission to display 

the designator code of Northern Air Cargo, Inc. (“NAC”) on certain MAS flights between 

Mexico City and Los Angeles for the purpose of transporting U.S. mail.

Respectfully submitted, 

Dr. Celestino Pena

U.S. Counsel

MAS AIR

Enclosure
cc: Robert Finamore

Brian Hedberg

David Christofano

Service List

sllunsford@fedex.com

Sharon.pasley@fedex.com

cefelts@fedex.com

robert.wirick@aa.com

howard.kass@aa.com

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

jhill@cooley.com (Counsel for Hawaiian and JetBlue)

jyoung@yklaw.com (Counsel for Spirit)

dkirstein@yklaw.com (Counsel for Spirit)

jcanny@amerijet.com

jrichardson@johnlrichardson.com (Counsel for Amerijet)

kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com

rsilverberg@sgbdc.com (Counsel for ABX)

jjohnson@sgbdc.com (Counsel for ABX)

rpommer@atlasair.com

dan.weiss@united.com

matwood@cozen.com (Counsel for Kalitta)

mlbenge@zsrlaw.com (Counsel for North American)

john.s.duncan@faa.gov

cristinasa@state.gov

December 4, 2014
boch20170331_10q.htm


Exhibit 10.1

 

REDDING BANK OF COMMERCE

Amendment to the Salary Continuation Agreements

 









  

REDDING BANK OF COMMERCE

AMENDMENT TO THE

SALARY CONTINUATION AGREEMENTS

 

On March 21, 2017, the Board of Directors of Redding Bank of Commerce approved an amendment to Section 1.5 B. of certain salary continuation agreements to correct a scrivener’s error.

 

The final sentence of Section 1.5 B. of certain salary continuation agreements has been amended and restated to read: 

 

“A Change in the Ownership of the Relevant Corporation occurs only when there is a transfer of stock of the Relevant Corporation (or issuance of stock of the Relevant Corporation) and stock in the Relevant Corporation remains outstanding after the transaction.”

 

The amendment is applicable to the following agreements:

 


	
Document
	 	 	
Form
	 	 	
SEC File No.
	 	 	
Original 

Exhibit No.
	 	 	
Filing Date

	
Amended and Restated Salary Continuation Agreement with Randall S. Eslick, dated November 19, 2013
	 	 	
10-K
	 	 	
000-25135
	 	 	
10.10
	 	 	
3/11/2014

	
Amended and Restated Salary Continuation Agreement with Samuel D. Jimenez, dated December 17, 2013
	 	 	
10-K
	 	 	
000-25135
	 	 	
10.12
	 	 	
3/11/2014

	
Amended and Restated Salary Continuation Agreement with Robert J. O’Neil, dated December 17, 2013
	 	 	
10-K
	 	 	
000-25135
	 	 	
10.16
	 	 	
3/11/2014

	
Salary Continuation Agreement with Robert H. Muttera, dated January 17, 2014
	 	 	
10-K
	 	 	
000-25135
	 	 	
10.18
	 	 	
3/11/2014
Exhibit 32 (b)
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
(15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78(d)); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Partnership.
 Date:
5-14-09
 /s/
    
    GARY S. JONES

Gary S. Jones 

President
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Northland
Cable Properties Seven Limited Partnership and will be retained by Northland Cable Properties Seven
Limited Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.  No. 01-4326

PAUL ANTHONY HAUSE,

Defendant-Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg.

W. Craig Broadwater, District Judge.

(CR-00-47)

Submitted: September 25, 2001

Decided: December 13, 2001

Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

COUNSEL

Mark Jenkinson, DOUGLAS & JENKINSON, Martinsburg, West

Virginia, for Appellant. Patrick M. Flatley, United States Attorney,

Paul T. Camilletti, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West

Virginia, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c). 
OPINION

PER CURIAM: 

Paul Hause appeals from the twenty-one month sentence imposed

upon his guilty plea to being a felon in possession of a firearm, 18

U.S.C. § 922(g) (1994). Hause argues that the district court should

have reduced his offense level pursuant to U.S. Sentencing Guidelines

Manual § 2K2.1(b)(2) (2000), because he possessed the firearm for

collection purposes only. 

Hause testified that he received the gun in 1996 as partial payment

on an automobile which he sold. Hause pawned the gun twice, in late

1996 and in early 1997, and did not redeem it after the second time.

A firearms expert testified that the gun was an inexpensive handgun

and that it was not the sort of firearm that would be considered a collectible. 

Based on this evidence, we cannot say that the district court clearly

erred in denying Hause an adjustment under § 2K2.1(b)(2). United

States v. Daughtrey, 874 F.2d 213, 217-18 (4th Cir. 1989). Accordingly, we affirm his sentence. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process. 

AFFIRMED

2 UNITED STATES v. HAUSE
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1436

AZEB YIGALEM, Petitioner, versus JOHN ASHCROFT, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A75-795-046) Submitted: July 28, 2004 Decided: August 18, 2004 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rev. Uduak J. Ubom, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Daniel E. Goldman, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Azeb Yigalem, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) dismissing her appeal of the immigration judge’s denial of her applications for asylum and withholding of removal. On appeal, Yigalem raises challenges to the immigration judge’s determination that she failed to establish her eligibility for asylum. To obtain reversal of a determination denying eligibility for relief, an alien “must show that the evidence [s]he presented was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.” INS v. EliasZacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 483-84 (1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record and conclude that Yigalem fails to show that the evidence compels a contrary result. Accordingly, we cannot grant the relief Yigalem seeks. Additionally, we uphold the immigration judge’s denial of Yigalem’s request for withholding of removal. To qualify for withholding of removal, an applicant must demonstrate “a clear probability of persecution.” INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca, 480 U.S. 421, 430-31 (1987). The standard for withholding of removal is more stringent than that for granting asylum. Chen v. INS , 195 F.3d 198, 205 (4th Cir. 1999). Because Yigalem fails to show that she is eligible for asylum, she cannot meet the higher standard for withholding of removal.- 3 - Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
**UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD ANN ARBOR, MI 48105
- 2498

OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION July 21 , 2011 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Meeting with Environment Canada FROM: Angela Cullen , Mechanical Engineer TO: Docket EPA
- HQ
- OAR
- 2010
- 0162 This memorandum documents a meeting held on March 18 , 2011 b etween E nvironment Canada and EPA and included the following individuals: E nvironment Canada : Stephan Couroux and Luis Phillipe EPA: By ron Bunker and Angela Cullen The discussion focused primarily on aerodyn amic testing of heav y duty programs at Natural Resources Canada and Transport Canada.
EXHIBIT 32

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CirTran Corporation on Form 10-QSB
for the period ending September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Iehab Hawatmeh, President
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

December 22, 2004

                             /s/ Iehab J. Hawatmeh
                             ----------------------------------------
                             Iehab J. Hawatmeh
                             President and Chief Financial Officer
J~~(EO STqT

~

S 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

o ~~~~ Q WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

2 ~llffl► 0 

PROj ~G~\

2 

NOV - 1 2-010 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

Mr. William B. Mackie 

Acting Manager, National TRU Program 

Carlsbad Field Office 

U.S. Department of Energy 

P.O. Box 3090 

Carlsbad, NM 88221-3090 

Dear Mr. Mackie: 

On February 8, 2010, the Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) requested, as a Tier 1(T1) 

change, that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approve remote-handled (RH) 

transuranic (TRU) waste stream IN-ID-NRF-153 (Naval Reactors Facility) from the Idaho 

National Laboratory (INL). EPA has reviewed the information provided and approves the 

addition of these containers from waste stream IN-ID-NRF-I 53 and, as a result, INL may dispose 

of this waste at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). This approval also allows future addition 

of waste to this stream with a waste pedigree (radiological and physical contents) similar to the 

waste approved in this letter and as detailed in the report. The enclosed report (EPA Docket No. 

A-98-49; II-A4-135) supports EPA's approval decision based on the information reviewed. 

If you have any questions regarding this approval, please contact Rajani Joglekar at (202) 

343-9462 or Ed Feltcorn at (202) 343-9422. 

Sincerely, 

Tom Peake, Director 

Center for Waste Management and Regulations 

Enclosure 

Intemet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov 

RecycledJRecyclable 9 Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper 
cc: Electronic Distribution 

Christine Gelles, DOE EM 

Alton Harris, DOE EM 

Ed Ziemianski, CBFO 

Ava Holland, CBFO QA 

J R Stroble, CBFO 

Courtland Fesmire, CBFO 

Martin Navarrete, CBFO QA 

Dennis Miehls, CBFO QA 

D K Ploetz, WTS-CCP 

Mike Sensibaugh, WTS-CCP 

Mark Pearcy, WTS-CCP 

Allison Pangle, CTAC 

Porf Martinez, CTAC 

Steve Zappe, NMED
Rail Vehicles Access Advisory Committee - Meeting #3

April 10 and 11, 2014

Updated Preliminary Agenda

U.S. Access Board Conference Room

1331 F Street, N.W., suite 800

Washington, DC 20004

Thursday, April 10 (10:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m.)

1. Introductions

2. Administrative Matters 

3. Reports from Subcommittee Conference Calls of February and March

4. Educational Presentations

a. Federal Railroad Administration – Rail 101 

b. American Public Transportation Association (APTA) Streetcar 

Subcommittee – Maximizing Accessibility for Modern Streetcar 

Systems

c. Ricon Corporation – An Overview of Vehicle Access Systems

d. Center for Inclusive Design and Environmental Access – Research: 

Anthropometry of Wheeled Mobility for Transportation Applications

e. Amtrak – GAP Mitigation/Elimination Program

5. Public Comment 

6. Communications Subcommittee (no earlier than 2 p.m.)

Note: Lunch (on your own) at a time favorable to the Committee.

Friday, April 11 (9:30 a.m. - 3:00 p.m.)

1. On-Board Circulation Subcommittee Meeting (morning)

2. Lunch (on your own)

3. Boarding and Alighting Subcommittee Meeting (afternoon)