alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

__________________________________________ ) Application of ) ) ISLAND WINGS LIMITED ) DOCKET DOT-OST-2012-0150 ) for an exemption from 49 U.S.C. § 41301 ) (Bahamas-U.S. charters) ) __________________________________________)

APPLICATION OF ISLAND WINGS LIMITED FOR RENEWAL OF AN EXEMPTION

Communications with respect to th is document should be sent to: John R. Mietus, Jr. Law Office of John Mietus, LLC 6701 Democracy Blvd., Suite 300 Bethesda, MD 20817-7500 (202) 747-5212 (240) 396-5362 fax john@mietuslaw.com

Counsel for ISLAND WINGS LIMITED

NOTICE: Any person may support or oppose th is application by filing an answer and serving a copy of the answer on counsel for Island Wings and upon persons served with this application no la ter than October 3, 2013.

September 18, 2013BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

__________________________________________ ) Application of ) ) ISLAND WINGS LIMITED ) DOCKET DOT-OST-2012-0150 ) September 18, 2013 for an exemption from 49 U.S.C. § 41301 ) (Bahamas-U.S. charters) ) __________________________________________)

APPLICATION OF ISLAND WINGS LIMITED FOR RENEWAL OF AN EXEMPTION

Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 40109(c), Isla nd Wings Limited respectfully requests renewal of the above-captioned exemption, granted by Notice of Action Taken dated September 24, 2012 (the “Notice”), for an additional, one-yea r period. The Notice permits Island Wings to engage in charter fo reign air transportati on of persons, property, and mail between a point or points in the Baha mas and a point or poi nts in Florida, and other charters pursuant to 14 CFR Part 212 of the Department’s regulations, using small aircraft. Island Wings intends to invoke the automatic extens ion provisions of 5 U.S.C. § 558(c) and Part 377 of the Department's Special Regulations. In support of this application, it states as follows: 1. Island Wings is a Bahamian flag carri er and intends to operate Bahamas-U.S.

charter service under the above -captioned charter authority. It remains licensed by the

Bahamian Department of Civil Aviation to perform charter air transportation, and BahamasU.S. charter operations remain governed by principles of comity and reciprocity that support the Department’s continued grant of authority. See, e.g., Inter Island Charters Ltd., Notice of
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                              
<ARTICLE>                                          5
<CIK>                                              0000812818
<NAME>                           Hutton Investors Futures Fund L.P. II
                                                    
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                       SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                                      14,927,645
<SECURITIES>                                                 1,759,064
<RECEIVABLES>                                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            16,686,709
<PP&E>                                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              16,686,709
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          382,586
<BONDS>                                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                0
<PREFERRED>                                                          0
<COMMON>                                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                                  16,304,123
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                16,686,709
<SALES>                                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             1,533,103
<CGS>                                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               210,042
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              1,323,061
<INCOME-TAX>                                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                      0
<CHANGES>                                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 1,323,061
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                   314.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Schmeltz, Rachel 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Hi Aaron, 

Schmeltz, Rachel 

Thursday, December 10, 2015 2:00 PM 

'Szabo, Aaron' 

Ragan Tate 

Page 3 in preamble 

Below is revised text in response to our discussion with lnteragency reviewers on page 3 of the proposal preamble. 

Thanks! 

Rachel 

Regulated Entities. These proposed revisions affect entities that must submit annual greenhouse gas {GHG) reports 

under the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) (40 CFR part 98). This proposed rule would impose a degree 

of reporting consistency across the U.S. for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from most sectors of the economy and therefore 

is "nationally applicable" within the meaning of section 307{b)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA). For the same reasons, the 

Administrator also finds that this action is of nationwide scope and effect and this action is based on such .2 

determination. (See CAA section 307(b)(1) (a petition for review may be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for 

the District of Columbia "if such action is based on a determination of nationwide scope or effect and if in taking such 

action the Administrator finds and publishes that such action is based on such a determination"). The scope and effect 

of this rulemaking extends to numerous judicial circuits since its implementation applies to facilities and reporters in all 

areas of the country. Further, the Administrator has determined that rules codified in 40 CFR part 98 are subject to the 

provisions of Clean Air Act (CAA) section 307{d). See CAA section 307{d)(l)(V) (the provisions of section 307{d) apply to 

"such other actions as the Administrator may determine"). These are proposed amendments to existing regulations. If 

finalized, these amended regulations would affect owners or operators of certain suppliers and direct emitters of GHGs 

Rachel Schmeltz 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

schmeltz.rachel@epa.gov 

Phone: 202-343-9124 

Telework on most Fridays 

Alternate phone number for telework days: 301-252-8060.
[No. 15543-9-III.

Division Three.

November 20, 1997.]

#### *In the Matter of the Marriage of*Sharon A. Caruso, *Respondent,*and Robert E. Caruso, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Spokane County, No. 92-3-01149-1, Tari S. Eitzen, J., entered January 31, 1996. *Affirmed in part*and *reversed in part*by unpublished opinion per Kurtz, J., concurred in by Brown, J., and Zagelow, J. Pro Tern.
# L_2018265DE.01002301.xml

| 24.10.2018 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 265/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.10.2018

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 265/23

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung 2018/1091 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 18. Juli 2018 über integrierte Statistiken zu landwirtschaftlichen Betrieben und zur Aufhebung der Verordnungen (EG) Nr. 1166/2008 und (EU) Nr. 1337/2011

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 200 vom 7. August 2018
  )

Seite 6, Artikel 3 Absatz 4

Anstatt:

„(4)   Bildet der in Absatz 2 des vorliegenden Artikels festgelegte Erfassungsbereich nicht 98 % der landwirtschaftlich genutzten en Fläche...“

muss es heißen:

„(4)   Bildet der in Absatz 2 des vorliegenden Artikels festgelegte Erfassungsbereich nicht 98 % der landwirtschaftlich genutzten Fläche ...“.

Seite 16, Anhang III „Kernstrukturdaten: Variablen“, Abschnitt „Allgemeine Variablen“, Spalte 1 Zeilen 8 und 9

Anstatt:

| „— | Die rechtliche und wirtschaftliche Verantwortung für den landwirtschaftlichen Betrieb liegt bei einer |
| --- | --- |

„—

Die rechtliche und wirtschaftliche Verantwortung für den landwirtschaftlichen Betrieb liegt bei einer

| — | natürlichen Person, die alleiniger Inhaber eines unabhängigen landwirtschaftlichen Betriebs ist“ |
| --- | --- |

—

natürlichen Person, die alleiniger Inhaber eines unabhängigen landwirtschaftlichen Betriebs ist“

muss es heißen:

| „— | Die rechtliche und wirtschaftliche Verantwortung für den landwirtschaftlichen Betrieb liegt bei |
| --- | --- |

„—

Die rechtliche und wirtschaftliche Verantwortung für den landwirtschaftlichen Betrieb liegt bei

| — | einer natürlichen Person, die alleiniger Inhaber eines unabhängigen landwirtschaftlichen Betriebs ist“. |
| --- | --- |

—

einer natürlichen Person, die alleiniger Inhaber eines unabhängigen landwirtschaftlichen Betriebs ist“.

Seite 16, Anhang III, Abschnitt „Allgemeine Variablen“, Spalte 1 Zeile 13

Anstatt:

„Gemeinsames Eigentum“

muss es heißen:

„Gemeinsamem Eigentum“.

Seite 18, Anhang III, Abschnitt „Flächenvariablen“ Zeile 2

Anstatt:

„Mohrenhirse“

muss es heißen:

„Sorghum“.

Seite 20, Anhang III, Abschnitt: „Flächenvariablen“ Zeile 14

Anstatt:

„Sonstige landwirtschaftliche Nutzfläche“

muss es heißen:

„Sonstige landwirtschaftliche Fläche“.

Seite 22, Anhang III, Abschnitt: „Variablen zum Viehbestand“, Zeile 9

Anstatt:

„Sonstige Geflügel a. n. g.“

muss es heißen:

„Sonstiges Geflügel a. n. g.“.

Seite 24, Anhang IV „Themenbereiche und Einzelthemen innerhalb der Module“, Spalte 2 „Themenbereich“, Zeile 7

Anstatt:

„Über einen Zeitraum von 12 Monaten bewässerte Kulturen“

muss es heißen:

„Innerhalb eines Zeitraumes von 12 Monaten bewässerte Kulturen“.

Seite 28, Anhang V „Genauigkeitstabelle“, Zeile 7

Anstatt:

„Modul zur Unterbringung der Tiere und Düngewirtschaft“

muss es heißen:

„Modul zu Stallhaltungsverfahren und Düngewirtschaft“.

---
[No. 15794-6-III.

Division Three.

October 30, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Elijah Jacob Martinez, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Franklin County, No. 95-1-50448-4, Craig Matheson, J., entered April 30, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Thompson, J., concurred in by Sweeney, C.J., and Brown, J.
IB 

Union Calendar No. 544 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7347 

[Report No. 118–647] 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs to report on whether the Secretary will include certain psychedelic 

drugs in the formulary of the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2024 

Mr. VAN ORDEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

SEPTEMBER 6, 2024 

Additional sponsor: Mr. BERGMAN

SEPTEMBER 6, 2024 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 7347 RH

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to report on whether the Secretary will include certain psychedelic drugs in the formulary of the Department of Veterans Affairs. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 7347 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPORTING OF DETERMINATION OF THE SEC4 RETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS WHETHER 

5 TO INCLUDE NEWLY APPROVED OR LI6 CENSED PSYCHEDELIC DRUGS IN THE FOR7 MULARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 

8 AFFAIRS. 

9 Chapter 81 of title 38, United States Code, is amend10 ed by inserting, after section 8125, the following new sec11 tion (and conforming the table of sections at the beginning 

12 of such chapter accordingly): 

13 ‘‘§ 8125A. Reporting of determination whether to in14 clude newly approved or licensed psyche15 delic drugs in the formulary of the De16 partment 

17 ‘‘Not later than 180 days after a psychedelic drug 

18 is approved under section 505 of the Federal Food, Drug, 

19 and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355) or licensed under sec20 tion 351 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262), 

21 the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Veterans’ 

22 Affairs of the Senate and House of Representatives a re23 port regarding such drug, that includes— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
4 

•HR 7347 RH

1 ‘‘(1) the determination of the Secretary whether 

2 to include such drug in the formulary of the Depart3 ment; and 

4 ‘‘(2) the justification of the Secretary for such 

5 determination.’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Union Calendar No. 544 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7347 

[Report No. 118–647] 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct 

of Veterans Affairs. delic drugs in the formulary of the Department whether the Secretary will include certain psychethe Secretary of Veterans Affairs to report on 

SEPTEMBER 6, 2024 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Editorial Note on Part 184
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 184 appear at 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; and 81 FR 49897, July 29, 2016.

§ 184.1140 Ammonium citrate, dibasic. ( a ) Ammonium citrate, dibasic ((NH4)2HC6H5O7, CAS Reg. No. 3012-65-5) is the diammonium salt of citric acid. It is prepared by partially neutralizing citric acid with ammonia.
( b ) The ingredient must be of a purity suitable for its intended use.
( c ) In accordance with § 184.1(b)(1), the ingredient is used in food with no limitation other than current good manufacturing practice. The affirmation of this ingredient as generally recognized as safe (GRAS) as a direct human food ingredient is based upon the following current good manufacturing practice conditions of use: ( 1 ) The ingredient is used as a flavor enhancer as defined in § 170.3(o)(11) of this chapter and as a pH control agent as defined in § 170.3(o)(23) of this chapter.
( 2 ) The ingredient is used in nonalcoholic beverages as defined in § 170.3(n)(3) of this chapter and in cheeses as defined in § 170.3(n)(5) of this chapter at levels not to exceed current good manufacturing practice.
( d ) Prior sanctions for this ingredient different from the uses established in this section, or different from those set forth in part 181 of this chapter, do not exist or have been waived.
[59 FR 63896, Dec. 12, 1994, as amended at 73 FR 8606, Feb. 14, 2008]
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

POWER DENSITY SOLUTIONS LLC, JAMES 

HILDEBRANDT,

Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee

______________________

2023-1957

______________________

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims 

in No. 1:21-cv-00911-AOB, Judge Armando O. Bonilla.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

Before DYK, CUNNINGHAM, and STARK, Circuit Judges. 

CUNNINGHAM, Circuit Judge.

O R D E R

The United States Court of Federal Claims entered 

judgment in this case on March 21, 2023. On May 23, 2023, 

appellants filed their notice of appeal from that judgment. 

The United States moves to dismiss this appeal as untimely. The appellants have not responded. 

Case: 23-1957 Document: 8 Page: 1 Filed: 10/26/2023
2 POWER DENSITY SOLUTIONS LLC v. US

To be timely, a party must file an appeal within 60 days 

of the final judgment or order being appealed from the 

Court of Federal Claims. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 2107, 2522; Fed. 

R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B); Fed Cir. R. 1(a)(1)(C). This time limit 

is “a jurisdictional requirement” and “not subject to equitable tolling.” Marandola v. United States, 518 F.3d 913, 914 

(Fed. Cir. 2008) (citation omitted). Here, the notice of appeal was due no later than May 22, 2023. Fed. R. App. P. 

26(a)(1)(C). Because the notice of appeal was not received 

within that time, we lack jurisdiction and must dismiss.

Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted. The appeal is dismissed.

(2) The parties shall bear their own costs.

 October 26, 2023 

 Date

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Jarrett B. Perlow

Jarrett B. Perlow

Clerk of Court

Case: 23-1957 Document: 8 Page: 2 Filed: 10/26/2023
### Water resources of the Pascagoula area, Mississippi

By: Edward Joseph HarveyHarold G. GoldenH. O. Jeffery

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1763

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 7**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 8**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 9**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 10**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 11**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 12**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 13**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 14**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 15**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 16**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Water resources of the Pascagoula area, Mississippi--Progress report(1959)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Editorial Note on Part 170
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 170 appear at 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001, and 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004.

§ 170.18 Tolerances for related food additives. ( a ) Food additives that cause similar or related pharmacological effects will be regarded as a class, and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, as having additive toxic effects and will be considered as related food additives.
( b ) Tolerances established for such related food additives may limit the amount of a common component that may be present, or may limit the amount of biological activity (such as cholinesterase inhibition) that may be present or may limit the total amount of related food additives that may be present.
( c ) Where food additives from two or more chemicals in the same class are present in or on a food, the tolerance for the total of such additives shall be the same as that for the additive having the lowest numerical tolerance in this class, unless there are available methods that permit quantitative determination of the amount of each food additive present or unless it is shown that a higher tolerance is reasonably required for the combined additives to accomplish the physical or technical effect for which such combined additives are intended and that the higher tolerance will be safe.
( d ) Where residues from two or more additives in the same class are present in or on a food and there are available methods that permit quantitative determination of each residue, the quantity of combined residues that are within the tolerance may be determined as follows: ( 1 ) Determine the quantity of each residue present.
( 2 ) Divide the quantity of each residue by the tolerance that would apply if it occurred alone, and multiply by 100 to determine the percentage of the permitted amount of residue present.
( 3 ) Add the percentages so obtained for all residues present.
( 4 ) The sum of the percentage shall not exceed 100 percent.
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 8.1

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

      Protherics PLC acts as the holding company of a group consisting of its
directly and indirectly held subsidiaries. Protherics PLC has the following
principal subsidiaries:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                     % HELD  STATUS   COUNTRY OF INCORPORATION
                                     ------  -------  ------------------------
<S>                                  <C>     <C>      <C>
DIRECT HOLDINGS
Protherics Molecular Design Limited    100   trading  England and Wales
Protherics Inc.                        100   trading  U.S.A. (Delaware)
Enact Pharma PLC                       100   trading  England and Wales
Proteus Biotechnology Limited          100   dormant  England and Wales
Genethics Limited                       76   dormant  England and Wales
INDIRECT HOLDINGS
Protherics UK Limited                  100   trading  England and Wales
Protherics Australasia pty Limited     100   trading  Australia
Protherics Utah Inc.                   100   trading  U.S.A. (Delaware)
Protherics Services pty Limited        100   dormant  Australia
Kymed GB Limited                       100   dormant  England and Wales
Enzacta R&D Limited                   99.8   dormant  England and Wales
DeMontford Biopharma Limited           100   dormant  England and Wales
Enzacta Limited                       99.8   dormant  England and Wales
TAb (Wales) Limited                    100   dormant  England and Wales
TAb (London) Limited                   100   dormant  England and Wales
Polyclonal Antibodies Limited          100   dormant  England and Wales
</TABLE>
[No. 20510-6-II.

Division Two.

November 26, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Kevin J. Smith, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Kit-sap County, No. 95-1-00998-9, William J. Kamps, J., entered March 25, 1996. *Affirmed in part*and *remanded*by unpublished opinion per Seinfeld, J., concurred in by Hunt, J.; Armstrong, J., concurring separately.