alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Sequa Corporation


Exhibit 10.6

Sequa Corporation




200 Park Avenue

New York, NY  10166

212-956-5500










May 10, 2006










Ms. Donna Costello

2 Queens Court

Orangeburg,   NY   10962




Re:

Employment Agreement Extension




Dear Donna:




Reference is hereby made to that certain Employment Agreement dated as of August 15, 2005 by and between Sequa Corporation and you (the “Employment Agreement”).  Terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Employment Agreement. 




This letter shall confirm that the Employment Term as set forth in Section 3 of the Employment Agreement shall be extended for an additional one (1) year from and after May 31, 2006 through May 31, 2007.




All other terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and are hereby ratified by Executive and Company.  




If the foregoing confirms your agreement and understanding, please so indicate by signing in the space provided below and returning one (1) original of this letter to me. 










Very truly yours,




Sequa Corporation




/s/ Martin Weinstein

Martin Weinstein

Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer




Acknowledged and Agreed 

this   18         day of    May   , 2006







	
	/s/ Donna Costello




Donna Costello
Editorial Note on Part 172
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 172 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; 70 FR 72074, Dec. 1, 2005; and 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 172.868 Ethyl cellulose. The food additive ethyl cellulose may be safely used in food in accordance with the following prescribed conditions: ( a ) The food additive is a cellulose ether containing ethoxy (OC2H5) groups attached by an ether linkage and containing on an anhydrous basis not more than 2.6 ethoxy groups per anhydroglucose unit.
( b ) It is used or intended for use as follows: ( 1 ) As a binder and filler in dry vitamin preparations.
( 2 ) As a component of protective coatings for vitamin and mineral tablets.
( 3 ) As a fixative in flavoring compounds.
38329.

#### MORRIS v. OWEN *et al.*

Gardner, Presiding Judge.

In *Morris v. Owen,*ante, a husband was bringing suit for alleged damages to his wife’s health because of facts set out in the petition. The case at bar is a suit brought by the wife for damages allegedly resulting *74from the same cause. The trial court sustained general demurrers to the petiton, thus dismissing the petition. We have set out the pleadings in case number 38330 quite extensively. In that case there was no allegation that the husband knew of the continued use of the drugs by the wife. In the instant case the petition alleges in paragraph 4: “That . . . she did use the original prescription as provided therein, and did from time to time thereafter, the exact dates and times not known to petitioner, but well known to the defendants did refill said prescription and did use the same in large doses and did become addicted to the use thereof and to such an extent that she could not resist the desire therefor.”

Decided July 11, 1960.

*James Maddox,*for plaintiff in error.

*Harry T. Lawrence,*contra.

Paragraph 7 reads: “That said prescription was refilled by the defendants without any new prescription therefor, and without said prescription being renewed. . .” By amendment the following was added to this paragraph of the petition: “That by the use of said drug, the same being habit forming, her will power and power to resist the same was destroyed to such an extent that she became addicted thereto and could not resist purchasing and using the same when it was sold to her.” It thus appears that the druggist sold habit-forming drugs to the defendant when she was beyond the pale of being able to determine and judge the possibilities of resulting damages to her health and mental powers. Consequently, the petition is not subject to general demurrer.

The court erred in sustaining the general demurrers and dismissing the petition. ■

*Judgment reversed.*

*Townsend, Carlisle and Frankum, JJ., concur.*
§ 182.3109 Thiodipropionic acid. ( a ) *Product.* Thiodipropionic acid.
( b ) *Tolerance.* This substance is generally recognized as safe for use in food when the total content of antioxidants is not over 0.02 percent of fat or oil content, including essential (volatile) oil content of the food, provided the substance is used in accordance with good manufacturing practice.
DISMISS and Opinion Filed October 28, 2022 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00652-CV 

CALRAYMOND ALLEN, Appellant 

V. 

FOREST GREEN MANOR, Appellee 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-22-02706-E 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Molberg, and Justice Goldstein 

Opinion by Chief Justice Burns 

After appellant failed to timely file his brief, we directed appellant by postcard 

dated September 19, 2022 to file his brief within ten days and cautioned appellant 

that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1). To date, appellant has not filed his brief or otherwise 

corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. 

 
 –2– 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8 (a)(1); 42.3(b), 

(c). 

220652F.P05 

 

/Robert D. Burns, III/

ROBERT D. BURNS, III 

CHIEF JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

CALRAYMOND ALLEN, Appellant 

No. 05-22-00652-CV V. 

FOREST GREEN MANOR, 

Appellee 

 On Appeal from the County Court at 

Law No. 5, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-22-02706-

E. 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice 

Burns. Justices Molberg and 

Goldstein participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is 

DISMISSED. 

Judgment entered October 28, 2022
1 Kiski Avenue Raymond J. Polinski

Leechburg, PA 15656 GM- Silicon Steels

Phone: 724-845-0259

E-mail: rjpolinski@alleghenyludlum.com

July 7, 2005

RE: Price Announcement

To our valued customers:

Effective with shipments beginning August 1, 2005, ATI Allegheny Ludlum is increasing

prices for grain-oriented silicon electrical steel products by approximately 26%. All

surcharges for grain-oriented steel remain in effect.

This increase is necessary for capital investment and profitable growth.

We appreciate your business and continued support. If you have questions, please

contact your ATI Allegheny Ludlum sales representative.

Sincerely yours,

Raymond J. Polinski

 EE-RM/STD-00-550 COMMENT 86

1 Kiski A venue 

Leechburg, P A 15656 

Phone: 724-845-0259 

E-mail: rjpolinski@alleghenyludlum.com 

RE: Price Announcement 

To our valued customers: 

July 7,2005 

Raymond J. Polinski 

GM - Silicon Steels 

Effective with shipments beginning August 1,2005, ATI Allegheny Ludlum is increasing 

prices for grain-oriented silicon electrical steel products by approximately 26%. All 

surcharges for grain-oriented steel remain in effect. 

This increase is necessary for capital investment and profitable growth. 

We appreciate your business and continued support. If you have questions, please 

contact your ATI Allegheny Ludlum sales representative. 

Sincerely yours, 

Raymond J. Polinski
#### § 1318.07 Non-liability of Drug Enforcement Administration.

The Administration shall have no liability with respect to the performance of any contractual terms agreed to by a grower and buyer of bulk cannabis, including but not limited to the quality of any cannabis delivered to a buyer. In the event that a buyer deems the delivered cannabis to be defective, the buyer's sole remedy for damages shall be against the grower and not the Administration.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7926

EUGENE R. DANIELS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

OFFICER NEAL; NFN SEWELL; MAJOR RILEY; WARDEN

JOHNSON; NFN MULLENAX; NURSE BEIFIELT; DOCTOR

EDWARDS; NFN MONTGOMERY; D. SBYANT; NFN MAST;

NFN HAMILTON; NURSE CROCKER; NFN WILLIAMS; NFN

MCGREW; BOBO; CAPTAIN MILLER; NFN WADE; NFN

SMITH; NFN ISGRIGG; NFN ULTMAN; MALE NURSE

GREEN; LIEUTENANT HART; NFN KUMINSKY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Margaret B. Seymour, District

Judge. (CA-99-4084-7)

Submitted: March 21, 2002 Decided: March 28, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eugene R. Daniels, Appellant Pro Se. Vinton DeVane Lide, VINTON D.

LIDE & ASSOCIATES, Lexington, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Eugene R. Daniels appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting

the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Daniels v. Neal, No. CA-99-4084-7 (D.S.C. filed Oct. 19, 2001 &

entered Oct. 25, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Mr. Eric Fygi Deputy General Counsel Department ofEnergy Washington, DC 20585

Dear Deputy General Counsel Fygi: 

# u.s. DEPARTMENT OFJUSTICE AntitmstDi"ision 

### Sharis A. Pozen Acting Assistant Attorney General
RFK Main Justice Building 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington. D.C. 20530-0001 (202)514-24011 (202)616-2645 (Fax) August 25, 2011

',.y

I am responding to your June 27, 2011 letter seekingtheviews ofthe Attorney General about the potential impact on competition ofproposed energy conservation standards for residential furnaces, central air conditioners, and heat pumps. Yourrequest was submitted under Section 325(o)(2)(B)(i)(V) ofthe Energy Policy and Conservation Act, as amended (ECPA), 42 U.S.C. 6295(o)(2)(B)(i)(5) and 42 U.S.C. 6316(a), which requires the Attorney General to make a determination ofthe impact ofany lessening of competition that is likelyto result from the imposition ofproposed energy conservation standards. The Attorney General's responsibility for responding to requests from other departments about the effect ofa program on competition has been delegated to the Assistant Attorney General for the Antitrust Division in 28 CFR 

### § 0.40(g). In conductingits analysis the Antitrust Division examines whether a proposed standard may lessen competition, for example, by substantially limiting consumer choice, byplacing certain manufacturers at an unjustified competitive disadvantage, orby inducing avoidable inefficiencies inproduction ordistribution ofparticularproducts. A lessening ofcompetition could result in higherprices to consumers, and perhaps thwart the intent ofthe revised standards byinducing substitution to less efficient products. Wehave reviewed the proposed standards contained in the Direct Final Rule (76 Fed. Reg. 37408, June 27, 2011). Wehave also reviewed supplementaryinformation submitted to the Attorney General by the Department ofEnergy. Based on this review, our conclusion is that the proposed energy conservation standards for residential furnaces, residential central air conditioners and heat pumps are unlikely to have a 

# IMr. Eric Fygi Page 2
significant adverse impact on competition. In reaching our conclusion, we note that these proposed energy standards were adopted from a Consensus Agreement signed by a broad cross-section ofindustry participants.
#### Navillus Inc., Respondent, v. Frank Guggino et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

In an action to foreclose a lien on real property for construction materials furnished, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated November 24, 1969, which denied appellants’ motion to dismiss the complaint for unreasonable failure to prosecute the case. Order reversed, on the law and on the facts, without costs, and motion granted. Plaintiff failed to comply with a notice served upon it pursuant to CPLR 3216 that it file a note of issue within 45 days and has not shown a justifiable excuse for the delay (CPLR 3216, sufod. [b], par. [3]; subd. [e]; *Kuroski*v. *Trenton-Ocean-Nevada Corp.,*27 A D 2d 935; *Pernise*v. *Di Giacomo,*25 A D 2d 447). Hopkins, Acting F. J., Munder, Martuscello, Latham and Brennan, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 3 (Wednesday, January 5, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 555]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-33352]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License; Reissuance

    Notice is hereby given that the following Ocean Transportation 
Intermediary license has been reissued by the Federal Maritime 
Commission pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 
U.S.C. chapter 409) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to 
the licensing of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR part 515.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               License No.                          Name/Address                       Date Reissued
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
021037N.................................  All West Coast Shipping Inc.,    November 7, 2010.
                                           dba West Coast Shipping, 1065
                                           Broadway Avenue, San Pablo, CA
                                           94806.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Tanga S. FitzGibbon,
Deputy Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.
[FR Doc. 2010-33352 Filed 1-4-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> USD
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          46,017
<SECURITIES>                                   149,557
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,719
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,191)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               162,563
<PP&E>                                          77,031
<DEPRECIATION>                                (33,775)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 277,990
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,303
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           365
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     259,181
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   277,990
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                56,231
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,479
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 28,752
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,252
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,252
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.49
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 1 (Monday, January 3, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 103-107]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-33034]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal Nos. 10-76]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Defense Security Cooperation Agency, Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 
601-3740.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a copy of a letter to the 
Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittals 10-76 with 
attached transmittal, policy justification, and Sensitivity of 
Technology.

    Dated: December 28, 2010.
Morgan F. Park,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P

[[Page 104]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN03JA11.004


[[Page 105]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN03JA11.005


[[Page 106]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN03JA11.006

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN03JA11.007

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C

[[Page 107]]

[FR Doc. 2010-33034 Filed 12-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
### U.S. Geological SurveyOpen-File Report 97-270

# Preliminary Geologic Map of the Sunland 7.5' Quadrangle, Southern California:  A Digital Database

## Compiled by R.F. Yerkes

## 1997

Photograph of the Sunland and Tujunga communities from the east showing the San Gabriel Mountains in the background.The communities of Sunland and Tujunga viewed to east with the 1288 m high Camelsback (left) and 1538 m high Mt. Lukens (right) as a backdrop. Big Tujunga Canyon and the San Gabriel Mountains are at the left edge of this photograph.  Photograph courtesy Verdugo Hills High School.

---

Files available for downloading:

ReadMe file: sunlnd.txt Unformatted documentation file describing content and formats of this publication (18 kb).

ReadMe file: sunlnd.ps as a PostScript file (880 kb).

Geologic map database (spatial and attribute GIS) files:Download all the geologic database layers and supporting materials in ARC/INFO 7.x ASCII EXPORT format, and all of the documentation files, packaged in a single UNIX tar file, compressed with gzip: - sunlnd.tar.gz that includes all the geologic map database layers listed below  (18.7 MB download, 77.4 MB uncompressed).

Download individual database layers in ARC/INFO 7.x ASCII EXPORT format, each layer compressed with gzip:

Geology - sl-geol.e00.gzFaults, contacts and geologic units (192 kb download, 736 kb uncompressed).

Structure - sl-strc.e00.gz Attitudes and fold axes (24 kb download, 208 kb uncompressed).

Wells - sl-wells.e00.gz Exploratory oil wells (4 kb download, 14 kb uncompressed).

Composite base map - sl-topo.e00.gz Composite quadrangle base map layer in vector format (18.1 MB download, 75.6 MB uncompressed).

For questions about the scientific content of this report, contact John Tinsley

---

Download a free copy of Adobe Reader

---

USGS Information Services Box 25286 Federal CenterDenver, CO 80225Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGSE-mail: infoservices@usgs.gov

---

| Help| PDF help || Publications main page| Western Open-File reports for 1997 | | Department of the Interior| U.S. Geological Survey || Geologic Division| Western Earth Surface Processes Team| Western Region GIS Home Page || Privacy Statement| Disclaimer| Accessibility |

---

The URL for this page is: https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/1997/of97-270Please send comments and suggestions, or report problems, to:Michael DigglesUpdated: August 28, 2007 (bwr, mfd)
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

JUL 6 - 2011 

OFFICE OF 

AIR A D RAO.AT (~N 

Mr. Niger Innis 

Affordable Power Alliance 

Congress of Racial Equality 

730 West Cheyenne Avenue, Suite 150 

North Las Vegas, Nevada 89030 

Dear Mr. Innis: 

Thank you for your letter of June 17, 2011, requesting an extension of the public comment 

period for the proposed "National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Coaland Oil-fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units and Standards of Performance for FossilFuel-Fired Electric Utility, Industrial-Commercial-Institutional, and Small IndustrialCommercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units" (the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards rule), 

which was published in the Federal Register on May 3, 2011. The proposal identified a public 

comment period of 60 days; that period would have ended on July 5, 2011. The U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, however, recently announced an extension of the comment 

period by 30 days to August 4. 

While we are extending the comment period, we are not seeking to extend the 

November 16,2011, deadline for signature of the final rule, and remain committed to meeting 

that deadline. 

The 30-day extension will provide the public with a 140-day period to review the proposal. As 

you know, interested parties were aware of the posting on March 16, 2011, of the signed 

proposal on the EPA's website (http://WWVl7.epa.gov/ttn/atw/utility/utilitypg.html), along with 

much of the pertinent supporting documentation (including the analyses used in establishing the 

proposed emission limits and the technical support documents). The proposal was published a 

little over six weeks later, on May 3, marking the beginning of the formal public comment 

period. This will provide the public with approximately 140 days to review and provide written 

comments on the proposed rule and supporting documents. It will also provide at least 60 days 

for other documentation that was not posted on the website until after the proposed rule was 

signed. Due to the substantive issues specific to this rulemaking, this comment per:iod is 

significantly longer than statutorily required. 

Internet Address (URL)' httpllwww epa gov 


Recyc led/Recyclable ' Pnnted With Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer. Process Chloron e Free Recycled Paper 

Again, thank you for your letter. We look forward to the timely receipt of your comments. 

Sincerely,