alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Realty   Income Corporation

11995 El Camino Real, San Diego, CA 92130

New York Stock Exchange Symbol “O”

Phone: (858) 284-5000

Fax: (858) 481-4858

 
    


 

EXHIBIT 10.2

 

February 14, 2017

 

Mr. John P. Case

Chief Executive Officer

Realty Income Corporation

11995 El Camino Real

San Diego, CA 92130

 

Dear John:

 

As you know, the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors of Realty Income Corporation (the “Company”) has the responsibility of designing the Company’s executive compensation programs in order to achieve the Company’s primary compensation objectives, including to align the interests of management with those of stockholders and to link executive compensation to the Company’s short-term and long-term performance.  The Committee considers full flexibility in compensation design, including with respect to equity-based compensation, to be crucial to its ability to carry out its duties in the best interest of stockholders.

 

Accordingly, this letter agreement is to confirm our mutual agreement that the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between you and the Company, effective as of September 3, 2013 (the “Employment Agreement”), shall be amended as follows, as of the date set forth above:

 

(i) Your Target Bonus, as defined and set forth in the first sentence of Section 4(b) of the Employment Agreement shall be no less than one hundred and fifty percent (150%) of your base salary for the applicable fiscal year; and

 

(ii) The second sentence of Section 5(b) of the Employment Agreement (which provides that beginning in 2014, no less than 50% of each of your annual equity awards will be time-based and that the remainder of each such award shall be performance-based) is hereby deleted.  The third sentence of Section 5(b) of the Employment Agreement shall be restated as follows:

 

“Any performance-based equity awards granted to Executive shall vest over a performance period of three years (or less) following the grant date, assuming the performance targets have been met.”

 

You agree that these amendments to the Employment Agreement will not constitute “Good Reason” for purposes of the Employment Agreement or any other agreement between you and the Company.

 

Please acknowledge your acceptance to the terms described in this letter agreement by signing below.  Upon your signature, the Employment Agreement will be deemed amended solely to the extent necessary to reflect the terms of this letter agreement but shall otherwise remain in full force and effect.

 

Regards,

 

Realty Income Corporation

 

By: /s/ Michael D. McKee                                  

Name: Michael D. McKee

Title: Chairman of the Board of Directors

 

ACKNOWLEDGED, ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO this 14TH of FEBRUARY, 2017.

 

 

/s/ John P. Case                                                      

John P. Case
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-7331

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RYAN MELVIN,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (4:16-cr-00056-RAJ-LRL-1)

Submitted: December 21, 2021 Decided: December 27, 2021

Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ryan Melvin, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-7331 Doc: 5 Filed: 12/27/2021 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Ryan Melvin appeals the district court’s orders denying his 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(1)(A) motion for compassionate release and denying reconsideration. We 

review a district court’s order granting or denying a compassionate release motion for 

abuse of discretion. See United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021), cert. 

denied, 142 S. Ct. 383 (2021). We have reviewed the record and conclude that the court 

did not abuse its discretion. The court denied Melvin’s motion after discussing the 

applicable 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors and sufficiently explained the reasons for the denial. 

See United States v. High, 997 F.3d 181, 188-91 (4th Cir. 2021) (discussing amount of 

explanation required for denial of straightforward compassionate release motion). We 

therefore affirm the district court’s orders. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 21-7331 Doc: 5 Filed: 12/27/2021 Pg: 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 31.1

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John C. Kleinert, Chief Executive Officer of Velocity Asset Management, Inc.
(the "Company") do hereby certify that:

         1.       I have reviewed this amended quarterly report on Form 10-QSB
of the Company;

         2.       Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and

         3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Company as of, and for, the period presented in this report.

         4.       The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the Company and have:

                  (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedure, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed, to ensure that material
information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this report is being prepared;

                  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

                  (c) disclosed in this report any changes in the Company's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the company's
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting;
and

         5.       The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the Company's auditors and the audit
committee of the Company's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

                  (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which hare reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and

                  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's
internal control over financial reporting.


                                       /s/ JOHN C. KLEINERT
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       John C. Kleinert
                                       Chief Executive Officer

November 24, 2006

                                       22
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-11524

In the Matter of: CHUCK SCHNEIDER,

Debtor.

RON ANDREWS, ET AL.,

Appellants,

VERSUS

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Appellee.

---------------------------------------------

RALPH HEMBREE, ET AL.,

 Appellants,

VERSUS

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(4:94-CV-204-Y)

August 22, 1997

Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appellants, Ron Andrews, et al., appeal from a summary

judgment granted in favor of appellee, Allstate Insurance Company,
2

by Judge Terry R. Means, United States District Judge for the

Northern District of Texas. Upon listening to oral arguments,

reading the briefs and motions of the parties, and extensive review

of the record, we find that there is no evidence of any apparent

authority upon which the plaintiffs relied. 

Accordingly, we AFFIRM the decision of the district court with

regard to this issue and all other matters.
<PAGE>   1
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549


                                    FORM 8-K
                                 CURRENT REPORT


                     Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
                         Securities Exchange Act of 1934



Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported) May 14, 1998

                              THE LOEWEN GROUP INC.
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



    British Columbia, Canada            0-18429                  98-0121376
(State or other jurisdiction of  (Commission File Number)     (IRS Employer 
      incorporation)                                         Identification No.)




4126 Norland Avenue, Burnaby, British Columbia                    V5G 3S8
(Address of principal executive offices)                         (zip code)



Registrant's telephone number, including area code      604-299-9321



                                       N/A
          (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)




                                                      Exhibit Index is on page 3
                                                                     Page 1 of 5

<PAGE>   2

ITEM 5.        OTHER EVENTS.

Pursuant to Form 8-K, General Instructions F, registrant hereby incorporates by
reference the press release attached hereto as Exhibit 99.


ITEM 7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND EXHIBITS.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
               Exhibit No.      Description
               -----------      -----------
<S>                             <C>
               Exhibit 99-1     The Loewen Group Inc. Press Release dated May 14, 1998

               Exhibit 99-2     The Loewen Group Inc. Press Release dated May 15, 1998

</TABLE>

                                   SIGNATURES

               Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by
the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

Dated: May 15, 1998

                                        THE LOEWEN GROUP INC.



                                        By: /s/ PETER S. HYNDMAN
                                            ------------------------------------
                                        Name:  Peter S. Hyndman
                                        Title:   Corporate Secretary

<PAGE>   3

                                  EXHIBIT INDEX


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         Sequential
Number         Exhibit                                   Page Number
------         -------                                   -----------
<S>            <C>                                       <C>
99-1           The Loewen Group Inc.                         4
               Press Release dated May 14, 1998

99-2           The Loewen Group Inc.                         5
               Press Release dated May 15, 1998
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MAY 2, 1998, AUDITED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JANUARY 
31, 1998 AND UNAUDITED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE 
QUARTERLY PERIODS ENDED MAY 2, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH QUARTERLY REPORT FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MAY 2, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-02-1998
<CASH>                                           4,761
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      461
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     21,571
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,571
<PP&E>                                          70,055
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,408
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  81,234
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,052
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        98,558
<OTHER-SE>                                    (34,635)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    81,234
<SALES>                                         21,705
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,705
<CGS>                                           15,595
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,144
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    11
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  48
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,997)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,997)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,997)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.71)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
H. Res. 831 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

April 18, 2018. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider in the House any bill specified in section 2 of this resolution. All points of order against consideration of each such bill are waived. The respective amendments in the nature of a substitute recommended by the 

Committee on Ways and Means now printed in each such bill 

shall be considered as adopted. Each such bill, as amended, 

shall be considered as read. All points of order against provisions in each such bill, as amended, are waived. The previous 

question shall be considered as ordered on each such bill, as 

amended, and on any further amendment thereto, to final 

passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of 

debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means; 

and (2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

SEC. 2. The bills referred to in the first section of this 

resolution are as follows: 
2 

•HRES 831 EH 

(a) The bill (H.R. 5444) to amend the Internal 

Revenue Code of 1986 to modernize and improve the Internal Revenue Service, and for other purposes. 

(b) The bill (H.R. 5445) to amend the Internal 

Revenue Code of 1986 to improve cybersecurity and taxpayer identity protection, and modernize the information 

technology of the Internal Revenue Service, and for 

other purposes. 

SEC. 3. (a) In the engrossment of H.R. 5444, the Clerk 

shall— 

(1) await the disposition of H.R. 2901, H.R. 5437, 

H.R. 5438, H.R. 5439, H.R. 5440, H.R. 5443, H.R. 

5445, and H.R. 5446; 

(2) add the respective texts of all the bills specified 

in paragraph (1), as passed by the House, as new matter 

at the end of H.R. 5444; 

(3) conform the title of H.R. 5444 to reflect the addition to the engrossment of the text of all the bills specified in paragraph (1) that have passed the House; 

(4) assign appropriate designations to provisions 

within the engrossment; and 

(5) conform cross-references and provisions for 

short titles within the engrossment. 
3 

•HRES 831 EH 

(b) Upon the addition to the engrossment of H.R. 5444 

of the text of the bills specified in subsection (a)(1) that have 

passed the House, such bills shall be laid on the table. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT JOSAIA SAR O, AKA Joe Ta g ic ive ra ta , Pe titione r, v. LORETTA E. LYNC H, Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde n t . No. 10-73598 Age n c y No. A077-305-082 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm ission De fe rre d August 8, 2013 Subm itte d Nove m

be r 1, 2015 ** Pa sa de n a , C a l ifornia B e fore : SILVER

M AN a nd WARDLAW , C irc uit Judge s, a n d GEOR GE, Se nior Distric t Judge . *** 

# FIL ED NOV 04 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public a t ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a )(2). *** The Honora

ble Lloy d D. Ge orge , Se n ior Distric t Judge for the U.S. Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ne va da , sitting by de signa tion.Josa ia Saro, a native and c itiz e n

of Fiji, pe titions for re vie w of the B oa rd of Im m i gration Appe a l s ’ de nia l of his 2009 m o tion to re ope n a

2002 in a bse ntia re m ova l orde r. W e have jurisdic tion pursua nt to 8 U.S.C . § 1252 a

nd de ny in pa rt and dismi ss in pa

rt the pe tition for re vie w. Saro argue s tha

t the B oa rd a buse d its disc re tion by

holding tha

t he re c e ive d prope r notic e of his re sc h e dule d he aring. Howe ve r, the im m igration c ourt sa

tisfie d both the sta

tute and due proc e ss by m a iling thenotic e of c ha nge d he aring to the e xa c t a ddre ss provide d by Saro in his written m o tion to c h ange ve nue . 8 U.S.C . § 1229a (b)(5)(A); Popa v . Holde r , 571 F.3d 890, 897-98 (9th C ir. 2009). Nor did the B IA a

buse its disc re tion by holding tha t Sa ro’ s m otion to re ope n to se e k a djustm e nt of sta

tus wa s untim e ly

be c a use it wa s file d se ve n y e ars a fte r the fina l re m o va l orde r. 8 U.S.C . § 1229a (c )(7)(C ), form e rly c odifie d at 8 U.S.C . § 1229a (c )(6)(C ) (2002); 8 C .F.R . § 1003.23(b)(1); Matte r of Monge s-Garc ia , 25 I. & N. De c . 247, 250-51 (B IA 2010). W e la c k jurisdic tion to c onside r, and the re fore dism i ss, Sa ro’ s ine ffe c tive a ssista nc e of c ounse l c la im

be c a use it wa s not ra ise d to the B oa rd . Barron v . Ashc roft , 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th C ir. 2004). PETITION FOR

REVIEW

DENIED IN PAR T AND DISM ISSED IN PAR T. 2
11 / 15 /2015

U. S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Amendment to Vision Pictures, LLC Exemption #11541 in Regulatory Docket No. FAA

2015

- 0423

Dear Sir or Madam:

Vision Pictures LLC hereby requests an amendment to exemption #11541 to allow for one (1)

additional type of unmanned aircraft system (UAS) that fully complies with the conditions of the

Petition for Exemption

.

Vision Pic tures wishes to operate the DJI Inspire under the same terms and conditions

contained in exemption #11541 . Attached hereto, and submitted as highly proprietary and

confidential documents are the Flight Operations and Procedures Manuals (FOPM) for (1)

additional UAS. All operations of the additional UAS will be in full compliance with the terms of

exemption #11541

.

As this is an amendment to an existing exemption asking for only the addition of other types

of unmanned aerial vehicles, Vision Pictures respectfully submits that good cause exists so that

notice does not need to be published in the Federal Register for the requested amendment.

Please contact the undersigned should you have any questions concerning this request for an

amendment to exemption #11541.

Sincerely yours,

Joel S Petersen

Vision Pictures LLC

2828 West Clark Ave, Burbank CA 91505

(323) 484

- 4022



### cc:

Jonathan B. Rupprecht, Esq.
Editorial Note on Part 177
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 177 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 70 FR 72074, Dec. 1, 2005; and 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 177.1600 Polyethylene resins, carboxyl modified. Carboxyl-modified polyethylene resins may be safely used as the food-contact surface of articles intended for use in contact with food in accordance with the following prescribed conditions: ( a ) For the purpose of this section, carboxyl-modified polyethylene resins consist of basic polymers produced when ethylene-methyl acrylate basic copolymers, containing no more than 25 weight percent of polymer units derived from methyl acrylate, are made to react in an aqueous medium with one or more of the following substances: Ammonium hydroxide. Calcium carbonate. Potassium hydroxide. Sodium hydroxide.
( b ) The finished food-contact article, when extracted with the solvent or solvents characterizing the type of food and under the conditions of time and temperature characterizing the conditions of its intended use as determined from tables 1 and 2 of § 176.170(c) of this chapter, yields total extractives in each extracting solvent not to exceed 0.5 milligram per square inch of food-contact surface as determined by the methods described in § 176.170(d) of this chapter; and if the finished food-contact article is itself the subject of a regulation in parts 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, and § 179.45 of this chapter, it shall also comply with any specifications and limitations prescribed for it by that regulation. In testing the finished food-contact articles, a separate test sample is to be used for each required extracting solvent.
( c ) The provisions of paragraph (b) of this section are not applicable to carboxyl-modified polyethylene resins used in food-packaging adhesives complying with § 175.105 of this chapter.
§ 182.8892 α-Tocopherol acetate. ( a ) *Product.* α-Tocopherol acetate.
( b ) *Conditions of use.* This substance is generally recognized as safe when used in accordance with good manufacturing practice.