alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000355999
<NAME> UNITED STATIONERS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> USD
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          19,038
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  213,242
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,775
<INVENTORY>                                    554,940
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               798,738
<PP&E>                                         267,967
<DEPRECIATION>                                  98,907
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,166,991
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          441,714
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,691
<OTHER-SE>                                     366,872
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,166,991
<SALES>                                      3,059,166
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,059,166
<CGS>                                        2,529,928
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,529,928
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               381,948
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,687
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              36,301
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                110,989
<INCOME-TAX>                                    47,064
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             63,925
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (5,907)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    58,018
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.60
        

</TABLE>
§ 1316.63 Official transcript; index; corrections. ( a ) Testimony given at a hearing shall be reported verbatim. The Administration will make provision for a stenographic record of the testimony and for such copies of the transcript thereof as it requires for its own purpose.
( b ) At the close of the hearing, the presiding officer shall afford the parties and witnesses time (not longer than 30 days, except in unusual cases) in which to submit written proposed corrections of the transcript, pointing out errors that may have been made in transcribing the testimony. The presiding officer shall promptly thereafter order such corrections made as in his judgment are required to make the transcript conform to the testimony.
[36 FR 7820, Apr. 24, 1971, as amended at 36 FR 13387, July 21, 1971. Redesignated at 38 FR 26609, Sept. 24, 1973, and amended at 50 FR 2046, Jan. 15, 1985]
[No. 14896-3-III.

Division Three.

November 20, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Larry Peter Chenevert, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Spokane County, No. 94-1-01059-1, Robert D. Austin, J., entered May 15, 1995. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Zagelow, J. Pro Tern., concurred in by Kurtz and Brown, JJ.
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1244 

To extend the authorization of appropriations for additional funds for the 

essential air service program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2017 

Mr. SCHUMER (for Ms. HIRONO (for herself, Mr. SULLIVAN, Mr. SCHATZ, and 

Ms. MURKOWSKI)) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To extend the authorization of appropriations for additional 

funds for the essential air service program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Keeping Our Commit5 ment to Essential Air Service Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress makes the following findings: 

8 (1) The intent of the Airline Deregulation Act 

9 of 1978 (Public Law 95–504; 92 Stat. 1705) was to 

10 benefit consumers by expanding competition and alVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:45 Jun 02, 2017 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1244.IS S1244

lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1244 IS

1 lowing United States air carriers greater ability to 

2 decide which destinations to serve and set pricing on 

3 airfares. 

4 (2) Congress recognized that the intended bene5 fits of deregulation may not reach all small commu6 nities, so the Airline Deregulation Act of 1978 also 

7 authorized the essential air service program so that 

8 small communities would not lose air service or con9 sumer choice if air carriers chose to serve the larger 

10 and more profitable markets. 

11 (3) According to the Department of Transpor12 tation, more than 170 communities in 35 States 

13 were served by the essential air service program in 

14 fiscal year 2016. 

15 (4) Without the essential air service program, 

16 air service would be cost prohibitive in many smaller 

17 communities, especially in Alaska and Hawaii where 

18 air travel is often the only mode of transportation. 

19 (5) The essential air service program provides 

20 small communities greater consumer choice and a 

21 lifeline to essential goods and services such as med22 ical care, increases economic opportunity, and at23 tracts visitors and new businesses. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1244 IS

1 SEC. 3. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIA2 TIONS FOR ADDITIONAL FUNDS FOR ESSEN3 TIAL AIR SERVICE PROGRAM. 

4 Section 41742(a)(2) of title 49, United States Code, 

5 is amended by striking ‘‘and 2017’’ and inserting 

6 ‘‘through 2022’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
MEMORANDUM

DATE: November 30, 2009

TO: The Record

FROM: Elaine Eby

SUBJECT: Superfund Cost Estimates for Selected Classes of Facilities

In October 2009, EPA’s Office of Resource Cons ervation and Recovery (ORCR) requested from the Office of Superfund Remediation and Techno logy Innovation (OSRTI) information on the cost, to date, associated with the clean-up of NPL sites that had been assigned to specific
NAICS codes, i.e., NAICS 324 – Petroleum and Co al Products Manufacturing and NAICS 325 – Chemical Manufacturing. ORCR also requeste d information on the Chrisman Creek NPL site which had been categorized under NAICS 2211 – Electric Power Generation, Transmission and Distribution. ORCR provided OSRTI’s Budget, Pl anning, and Evaluation Branch with a list of NPL sites in these categories. (See Email from ChoYi Kwan to Elaine Eby entitled Updated NPL Proposed Listing by Year Table , October 8, 2009 which can be found in the docket supporting this notice). The following information was provided to ORCR by OSRTI.

For the NPL sites identified in the NAICS 324 category, EPA has spent approximately $250 million (in 2009 constant dollars) through FY 2009.

For the NPL sites identified in the NAICS 325 category, EPA has spent approximately $2.7 billion (in constant 2009 dollars) through FY 2009.

For the NPL site identified in the NAICS Other category, EPA has spent approximately $1.4 million (in constant 2009 dollars) through FY 2009.

These data represent OSRTI’s analysis of end of FY 2009, cumulative, site-specific, agency-wide, direct expenditures of Superfund appropriated an d reimbursable resources extracted from the US EPA Integrated Financial Management System (IFMS).

Expenditure data include all direct site costs, including, but not limited to, site assessment, remedial, removal, enforcement, and oversight costs. Data do not include indirect costs, costs incurred by private or other parties performing response actions, or future costs to be incurred at these sites and may not be used for cost recovery purposes.

Expenditure data are converted in to 2009 constant dollars usin g GDP deflation factors derived

from:

Table 10.1--GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT AN D DEFLATORS USED IN THE HISTORICAL TABLES: 1940-2009, from the Budget of th e U.S., FY 2005 Online via GPO Access.
Seventh Amendment to the CSG Master Subscriber Management Systems Agreement



 Exhibit 10.20F 
 Pages where confidential treatment has been requested are stamped “Confidential Treatment Requested and the Redacted Material has been separately filed with the Commission,” and places where information
has been redacted have been marked with (***). 
 SEVENTH AMENDMENT 
 TO 
 CSG MASTER SUBSCRIBER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AGREEMENT 
 BETWEEN 
 CSG SYSTEMS, INC.

 AND 
 COMCAST CABLE
COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC 
 This Seventh Amendment (the “Amendment”) is made by and between CSG Systems, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (“CSG”) and Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company (“Customer”). CSG and Customer entered into a certain CSG Master Subscriber Management System Agreement dated
March 17, 2004, (the “Agreement”), and now desire to amend the Agreement in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this Amendment. If the terms and conditions set forth in this Amendment shall be in conflict with the
Agreement, the terms and conditions of this Amendment shall control. Any terms in initial capital letters or all capital letters used as a defined term but not defined in this Amendment shall have the meaning set forth in the Agreement. Upon
execution of this Amendment by the parties, any subsequent reference to the Agreement between the parties shall mean the Agreement as amended by this Amendment. Except as amended by this Amendment, the terms and conditions set forth in the Agreement
shall continue in full force and effect according to their terms. 
 CSG and Customer agree as follows: 
  

	1.	Effective April 1, 2006, the fees for Third Party Communication Software for residential voice services set forth in Addendum B, Section 1 (as amended in the Second
Amendment executed October 11, 2004) ***** ** ******* $**,***.** * ***** *** ** ** ******* ******** (**,***) ********** *****. ** *** ***** *** ***** ****** ** ********** ***** ******* ******* ******** (**,***) ** *** *****, Customer and CSG
agree to renegotiate the pricing for Third Party Communication Software for residential voice services. 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties
execute this Amendment on the date last signed below (“Effective Date”). 
  

									
	CSG SYSTEMS, INC. (“CSG”)	 		 	COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC (“CUSTOMER”)
					
	By:	 	/s/ Rick Norman	 		 	By:	 	/s/ D H Richardson
					
	Name:	 	Rick Norman	 		 	Name:	 	D H Richardson
					
	Title:	 	VP CSG Systems	 		 	Title:	 	SVP Admin
					
	Date:	 	4/6/06	 		 	Date:	 	3/31/06

 CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - FOR USE BY AUTHORIZED EMPLOYEES OF THE PARTIES HERETO
ONLY AND IS NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION WITHIN OR OUTSIDE THEIR RESPECTIVE COMPANIES
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statement No.
333-49488 on Form S-8 of Pro Tech Communications, Inc. of our report dated March
3, 2006 (with respect to Note 18, March 23,  2006)on our audits of the financial
statements  and schedule II as of December 31, 2004 and 2005 and for each of the
years ended December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005,  included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K




Eisner LLP

New York, New York
March 23, 2006
[No. 15780-6-III.

Division Three.

November 6, 1997.]

#### *In the Matter of the Marriage of*James Robert Schultz, *Appellant,*and Mickie Lou Schultz, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Lincoln County, No. 95-3-01715-5, Philip W. Borst, J., entered May 7, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Sweeney, C.J., concurred in by Schultheis and Brown, JJ.
#### Carlos Bartolome VASQUEZ-TRUJILLO, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 03-74151. Agency No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Sept. 16, 2005.

Decided Sept. 26, 2005.

*510Edgardo Quintanilla, Attorney at Law, Sherman Oaks, CA, for Petitioner.

Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration & Naturalization Service, Lagu-na Niguel, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Joan E. Smiley, Richard M. Evans, Susan Houser, U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before FARRIS, THOMPSON, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Petitioner Vasquez-Trujillo (Vasquez) appeals the order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), upholding the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of Vasquez’s Motion to Suppress and finding that Vasquez is removable. Vasquez argues that he was entitled to *Miranda*warnings before being questioned by the FBI and INS respecting the legality of his immigration status, that INS agents violated their own procedure as outlined in 8 C.F.R. § 287.3, and that the IJ violated his Fifth Amendment right to silence when he required Vasquez to disclose his country of origin. The facts and procedural history are known to the parties and we do not recount them here.

It is settled law in this jurisdiction that deportation proceedings are civil, and not criminal, in nature. *See Trias-Hernandez v. INS,*528 F.2d 366 (9th Cir.1975); *United States v. Alderete-Deras,*743 F.2d 645 (9th Cir.1984). Consequently, those Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights outlined in a *Miranda-type*warning are inapposite in the context of removal proceedings. Accordingly, we find that Vasquez was not entitled to a *Miranda-*type warning before voluntarily meeting in his home with FBI and INS agents and discussing the legality of his immigration status, and any relevant information the FBI and INS learned in the course of such meetings may form the basis for Vasquez’s arrest and subsequent deportation proceedings. For similar reasons, we find *511that the IJ did not violate any of Vasquez’s rights in requiring that he identify his country of origin during a deportation hearing. *Alderete-Deras,*743 F.2d at 647-48.

We also find Vasquez’s allegations that INS Agent Richins violated 8 C.F.R. § 287.3 to be without merit. Even assuming that there was a violation of the regulation, Vasquez has failed to demonstrate that he suffered any prejudice to his interests as a result, as he must demonstrate pursuant to our decision in *United States v. Calderon-Medina,*591 F.2d 529 (9th Cir.1979).

AFFIRMED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsRuggedness Evaluation of ASTM International Standard Test Methods for Shape Memory Materials: E3097 Standard Test Method for Mechanical Uniaxial Constant Force Thermal Cycling of Shape Memory AlloysThis paper evaluates the ruggedness testing of the newly released ASTM International E3097 Standard Test Method for Mechanical Uniaxial Constant Force Thermal Cycling of Shape Memory Alloys. The ruggedness experiment was designed with eight runs in two replicates, consisting of seven factors of strain rate (ė), heating and cooling rates (T(sub heat) and T(sub cool), respectively), upper and lower cycle temperatures (UCT and LCT, respectively), hold time (t(sub hold)), and minimum load (F(sub min)) imparted on the samples. The results indicate that the hold time factor had no effect on any result variable. The minimum load factor, alternatively, had the greatest effect on several result variables, with the greatest influence on the strains at martensite start and finish (strain variation ~0.1 percent), and the strains at the upper and lower cycle temperatures (strain variation of 0.14 percent). The UCT was found to have a large effect on the austenite and martensite finish tangent line and data intersect, denoted by A(sub f(sup *)) and M(sub f(sup*)), by ~17 and 4 °C, respectively. The testing methodology, analysis techniques, and resulting conclusions on the ruggedness of the test methods are presented.Document ID20190001450Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsBenafan, Othmane*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Bigelow, Glen S.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Wood, Leo*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredMarch 12, 2019Publication DateFebruary 1, 2019Subject CategoryChemistry And Materials (General)Astronautics (General)Report/Patent NumberNASA/TM-2019-220029GRC-E-DAA-TN61502E19630Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 109492.02.03.02.01.01CONTRACT_GRANT: NNC16QA09DDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20190001450.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsIDRelationTitle20220014938SupersedesRuggedness Evaluation of ASTM International Standard Test Methods for Shape Memory Materials: E3097 Standard Test Method for Mechanical Uniaxial Constant Force Thermal Cycling of Shape Memory Alloysvisibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          22,841
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,757
<PP&E>                                           5,037
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  40,580
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,913
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           124
<OTHER-SE>                                      35,443
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    40,580
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,295
<CGS>                                            1,535
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,028
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                29,624
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,735)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,735)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,735)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.81)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.81)
<FN>
<F1>Notes and accounts receivable-trade are reported net of allowances for
doubtful accounts in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Office Work

              																								United States. Women's Bureau.						"Office Work in Los Angeles, 1940 : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 188-2" in *Office Work : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 188*			(1942).						https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5461/item/539643, accessed on September 25, 2024.	    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER