alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DAVID REYES,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 86 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 8th day of August, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 101 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.101

                       One Hundred Ninth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the third day of January, two thousand and six

                                 An Act

To convey to the town of Frannie, Wyoming, certain land withdrawn by the 
                      Commissioner of Reclamation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF LAND TO THE TOWN OF FRANNIE, WYOMING.

    (a) Conveyance.--Subject to valid existing rights, the Secretary of 
the Interior shall convey by quitclaim deed, without consideration, all 
right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the parcel of 
land described in subsection (b) to the town of Frannie, Wyoming.
    (b) Description of Land.--The parcel of land referred to in 
subsection (a) is the parcel of land withdrawn by the Commissioner of 
Reclamation--
        (1) consisting of approximately 37,500 square feet;
        (2) located in the town of Frannie, Wyoming; and
        (3) more particularly described in the approved Plat of Survey 
    of Frannie Townsite, Wyoming, as the North \1/2\ of Block 26, T. 58 
    N, R. 97 W.
    (c) Reservation of Mineral Rights.--The conveyance under subsection 
(a) shall be subject to the reservation by the United States of any oil 
and gas rights.
    (d) Revocations.--
        (1) Special use permit.--The special use permit issued by the 
    Commissioner of Reclamation, numbered O-LM-60-L1413, and dated 
    April 20, 1990, is revoked with respect to the land described in 
    subsection (b).
        (2) Secretarial orders.--The following Secretarial Orders 
    issued by the Commissioner of Reclamation are revoked with respect 
    to the land described in subsection (b):
            (A) The Secretarial Order for the withdrawal of land for 
        the Shoshone Reclamation Project dated October 21, 1913, as 
        amended.
            (B) The Secretarial Order for the withdrawal of land for 
        the Frannie Townsite Reservation dated April 19, 1920.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
(logo)GE                                                              GE CAPITAL

                                       GE CAPITAL MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC.
                                       A UNIT OF GE CAPITAL MORTGAGE CORPORATION
                                       THREE EXECUTIVE CAMPUS, P.0. BOX 5260
                                       CHERRY HILL, NJ 08034-0455
                                       609 661-6100, 800 257-7818





Except for non-compliance  with minimum servicing standard I. 1 described below,
as of and for the year ended  December 31, 1995, GE Capital  Mortgage  Services,
Inc.  (the  Company)  has  complied in all  material  respects  with the minimum
servicing  standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers  Association of America's
UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM FOR MORTGAGE BANKERS. As of and for this same
period,  the  Company  had in effect a fidelity  bond and  errors and  omissions
policy in the amount of $100 million and $20 million, respectively.

With respect  to  minimum  servicing  standard I.1., certain  accounts contained
reconciling items that were  not  resolved  within  90  calendar  days  of their
original identification.



/s/ X Gregory  A. Gil____
Vice President, Mortgage Servicing
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7180 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7180

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 4, 2024

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 80 1st Street in Kingsland, Arkansas, as the ``Kingsland `Johnny 
                          Cash' Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. KINGSLAND ``JOHNNY CASH'' POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 80 1st Street in Kingsland, Arkansas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Kingsland `Johnny Cash' Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Kingsland 
`Johnny Cash' Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 3, 2024.

            Attest:

                                             KEVIN F. MCCUMBER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7213 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to øenhance activities of the National 

Institutes of Health with respect to research on autism spectrum disorder 

and enhance programs relating to autism / reauthorize certain programs 

with respect to autism spectrum disorder?¿, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2024 

Mr. SMITH of New Jersey (for himself and Mr. CUELLAR) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to øenhance activities of the National Institutes of Health with respect 

to research on autism spectrum disorder and enhance 

programs relating to autism / reauthorize certain programs with respect to autism spectrum disorder?¿, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Autism Collaboration, 

5 Accountability, Research, Education, and Support Act of 

6 2024’’ or the ‘‘Autism CARES Act of 2024’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7213 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROGRAMS RELATING TO AUTISM. 

2 (a) DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES SURVEILLANCE

3 AND RESEARCH PROGRAM.—Section 399AA(e) of the 

4 Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 280i(e)) is amended 

5 by striking ‘‘2024’’ and inserting ‘‘2029’’. 

6 (b) AUTISM EDUCATION, EARLY DETECTION, AND

7 INTERVENTION.—Section 399BB(g) of the Public Health 

8 Service Act (42 U.S.C. 280i–1(g)) is amended by striking 

9 ‘‘2024’’ and inserting ‘‘2029’’. 

10 (c) INTERAGENCY AUTISM COORDINATING COM11 MITTEE.—Section 399CC(f) of the Public Health Service 

12 Act (42 U.S.C. 280i–2(f)) is amended by striking ‘‘2024’’ 

13 and inserting ‘‘2029’’. 

14 SEC. 3. REPORTS TO CONGRESS. 

15 øDo you not want to update the reporting deadlines 

16 in section 399DD?¿ 

17 SEC. 4. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

18 Section 399EE of the Public Health Service Act (42 

19 U.S.C. 280i–4) is amended— 

20 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘$23,100,000 

21 for each of fiscal years 2020 through 2024’’ and in22 serting ‘‘$28,100,000 for each of fiscal years 2025 

23 through 2029’’; 

24 (2) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘$50,599,000 

25 for each of fiscal years 2020 through 2024’’ and inVerDate Sep 11 2014 20:13 Mar 04, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H7213.IH H7213

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7213 IH

1 serting ‘‘$56,344,000 for each of fiscal years 2025 

2 through 2029’’; and 

3 (3) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘there are au4 thorized to be appropriated $296,000,000 for each 

5 of fiscal years 2020 through 2024’’ and inserting 

6 ‘‘there is authorized to be appropriated 

7 $341,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2025 through 

8 2029’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-61494 and 333-64858) and Form S-8 (Nos.
333-33122, 333-44598, 333-64637 and 333-86303) of Level 8 Systems, Inc. of our
report dated February 18, 2000 relating to the financial statements for the year
ended December 31, 1999, which appears in this Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1).

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
McLean, Virginia
April 29, 2002
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 754 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 754

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         April 4, 2006.
    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and they are hereby, elected 
to the following standing committee of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Science: Mr. Neugebauer to rank after Mr. Feeney and Mr. Mario 
Diaz-Balart of Florida.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
[No. 20017-1-II.

Division Two.

January 16, 1998.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Michael Rowe Russo, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Clark County, No. 95-1-00836-4, Edwin L. Poyfair, J., entered September 28, 1995. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Houghton, C.J., concurred in by Bridgewater and Hunt, JJ.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Series of Studies on Employment of Women in Various Defense Industries

              																								United States. Women's Bureau.						"Women's Employment in Aircraft Assembly Plants in 1942 : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 192-1" in *Series of Studies on Employment of Women in Various Defense Industries : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 192*			(1942).						https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5465/item/539653, accessed on September 5, 2024.	    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
From: Erin M. Tallardy

To: Finamore, Robert (OST)

Subject: International Jet Management

Date: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 10:41:59 AM

Hi Bob,

I got your voicemail last Friday morning, and on behalf of IJM, this confirms that the carrier does

not operate any aircraft with more than 60 seats.

Please let me know if you need additional information.

Thanks and best regards,

Ms. Erin M. Tallardy

Garofalo Goerlich Hainbach PC

1200 New Hampshire Ave. NW, Ste. 800

Washington, D.C. 20036

Phone: 202-776-3970

Fax: 202-776-3975

E-mail: etallardy@ggh-airlaw.com

This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may

contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable

law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any

dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have

received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and destroy this message and

all copies of this message whether in paper, electronic or other form. Thank you.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A22A0639. DAVID SABBY v. THE STATE.

David Sabby was convicted of incest and other crimes, and we affirmed his

convictions on appeal in an unpublished opinion. Sabby v. State, Case No. A15A1105

(Nov. 20, 2015). Sabby later filed a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter

jurisdiction, alleging that his indictment was void. The trial court dismissed the

motion, ruling that it was not an appropriate procedural mechanism for challenging

the validity of his convictions. Sabby appeals.

As the Supreme Court has made clear, a motion seeking to challenge an

allegedly invalid or void judgment of conviction “is not one of the established

procedures for challenging the validity of a judgment in a criminal case,” and an

appeal from the denial of such a motion is subject to dismissal. Roberts v. State, 286

Ga. 532 (690 SE2d 150) (2010). Because Sabby is not authorized to collaterally

attack his convictions in this manner, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED. See id.;

Harper v. State, 286 Ga. 216, 218 (1) (686 SE2d 786) (2009). 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

December 07, 2021

12/07/2021
United States

Department of

Agriculture

Forest

Service

White Mountain 

National Forest

71 White Mountain Drive

Campton, NH 03223

Comm: (603) 536-6100

TTY: (603) 536-3665

Caring for the Land and Serving People Printed on Recycled Paper 

File Code: 2580

Date: April 9, 2012

Glenn Keith

Department of Environmental Protection

Bureau of Waste Prevention

One Winter Street, 7th Floor

Boston, MA 02108

Dear Mr. Keith:

In February 2012, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts posted a notice seeking public comment on 

Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection’s (MassDEP) proposed Revision to the 

Massachusetts Regional Haze State Implementation Plan (RH SIP). The MassDEP Revision proposed to 

amend the December 30, 2011 RH SIP to address Best Available Retrofit Technology requirements and 

other emission reduction commitments for electric generating units (EGUs). In particular, MassDEP 

proposes a different alternative to BART for EGUs.

This letter acknowledges that the U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Forest Service, has reviewed your 

proposed Revision. The Forest Service's participation in Massachusetts’ administrative process does not 

waive any legal defenses or sovereignty rights it may have under the laws of the United States, including 

the Clean Air Act and its implementing regulations. Only the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

(EPA) can make a final determination about the document's completeness, and therefore, only the EPA 

has the ability to approve the document. 

From the perspective of a Federal Land Manager, who has an affirmative responsibility to protect the air 

quality related values in federal Class I areas, we are encouraged that a number of significant steps are 

being taken to reduce sulfur dioxide emissions. Some of these steps include the retirement of Somerset 

Power Unit 8 in 2010, the proposed retirement of Salem Harbor Units 3 and 4 in 2014, and MassDEP’s 

proposed amendments to its low sulfur fuel oil regulation (which would require EGUs that burn residual 

oil to limit the sulfur content to 0.5% by weight beginning July 1, 2014). We also acknowledge your 

proposal to review EGU emissions in 2013, with the intent of a 90% reduction in sulfur dioxide emissions 

from EGUs from 2002 levels by 2018. 

We appreciate the opportunity to work closely with the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The Forest 

Service compliments you on your hard work and dedication to significant improvement in our nation's air 

quality values and visibility. I look forward to your response required by 40 CFR 51.308(i)(3). For 

further information, please contact Ralph Perron, Air Quality Specialist, at (802) 222-1444.

Sincerely,

/s/ Thomas G. Wagner

THOMAS G. WAGNER

Forest Supervisor

cc: Ann Acheson
Bret A Anderson

Charles E Sams

Mary Beth Borst

Thomas R Doane

Colleen Madrid

K R Simmons
[No. 38941-6-I.

Division One.

November 3, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Caesar C. Garner, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 95-1-07092-9, LeRoy McCullough, J., entered July 3, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
# L_2018257EN.01000301.xml

| 15.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 257/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 257/3

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2018/1529

of 8 October 2018

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Cioccolato di Modica’ (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Italy's application to register the name ‘Cioccolato di Modica’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Italy's application to register the name ‘Cioccolato di Modica’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Cioccolato di Modica’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Cioccolato di Modica’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Cioccolato di Modica’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 2.2. – chocolate and derived products, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 8 October 2018.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 159, 7.5.2018, p. 32.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
Declaration of a Blank Bill Issuer.



 EXHIBIT 10.2 
 DECLARATION OF A BLANK BILL ISSUER 
 (for a legal entity) 
 As the security of the execution of the Agreement on Project Financial Support no SPOWKP/2.3/4/12/1998, dated 30 May 2006 on the execution of the Innovation in
the Manufacture of Precision Components for Aircraft and Power Engineering Industries, financed from the financial resources of the Branch Operational Program – Increase of the Competitiveness of Business Enterprises, years 2004 –
2006, Priority 2 – Direct Supporting of Business Enterprises, Activity 2.3. – Increasing Competitiveness of Small and Medium-size Companies Through Investments, we hereby submit on behalf of the Polish Enterprise Development Agency, a
blank bill signed by officers authorized to issue bills in the name and on behalf of Kreisler Polska limited liability company, which the Polish Enterprise Development Agency shall be entitled to fill at all times to the amount of the granted
support with due interest in the amount determined for delayed tax payments from the date of the transfer of the due sum to the bank account of the Beneficiary to the day of its refund, increased by bill rediscount rate and the cost of any due court
fee. 
 The Polish Enterprise Development Agency shall at its own consideration decide on the date of payment to be inscribed in the bill. 
 The bill shall be payable in Warsaw, to the bank account of the Polish Enterprise Development Agency. 
 The Polish Enterprise Development Agency shall notify Kreisler Polska limited liability Company of the foregoing with a registered letter sent 7 days prior to the term of payment at the latest, to the address stated
underneath unless the Beneficiary has notified the Polish Enterprise Development Agency of the change of its address. A letter that has been returned to the sender bearing the note of a post office: “not collected in due time”, “the
addressee has moved away” and similar shall be deemed delivered. 
  

 1 








 Name and address of Blank Bill Issuer 
 Legible signatures of the officer authorized to issue a bill, stamp of the company. 
 Personal data of the officer
authorized to issue a blank bill: 
 Boguslaw Walkowicz, Proxy 
 Identity Card number: [Intentionally Left Blank] 
 Personal Identification Number (PESEL): [Intentionally Left Blank] 
 Parents’ names: [Intentionally Left Blank] 
 Date and place of birth:
[Intentionally Left Blank] 
 Signature: [Intentionally Left Blank] 
 The bill shall be returned or destroyed at the request of the Beneficiary, made in writing, after the elapse of the period of 5 years from the date of the Project accomplishment and following the satisfaction of all requirements defined in
the Agreement on Project Financial Support. 
  

 2