alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 251.15 Qualifying laboratory requirements. ( a ) To be considered a qualifying laboratory for purposes of section 804 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and this part, a laboratory must have ISO 17025 accreditation.
( b ) To be considered a qualifying laboratory for purposes of section 804 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and this part, a laboratory must have an FDA inspection history and it must have satisfactorily addressed any objectionable conditions or practices identified during its most recent FDA inspection, if applicable.
( c ) To be considered a qualifying laboratory for purposes of section 804 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and this part, a laboratory must comply with the applicable current good manufacturing practice requirements, including provisions regarding laboratory controls in § 211.160 of this chapter and laboratory records in § 211.194 of this chapter.
Editorial Note on Part 130
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 130 appear at 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 130.20 Food additives proposed for use in foods for which definitions and standards of identity are established. ( a ) Where a petition is received for the issuance or amendment of a regulation establishing a definition and standard of identity for a food under section 401 of the act, which proposes the inclusion of a food additive in such definition and standard of identity, the provisions of the regulations in part 171 of this chapter shall apply with respect to the information that must be submitted with respect to the food additive. Since section 409(b)(5) of the act requires that the Commissioner publish notice of a petition for the establishment of a food additive regulation within 30 days after filing, notice of a petition relating to a definition and standard of identity shall also be published within that time limitation if it includes a request, so designated, for the establishment of a regulation pertaining to a food additive.
( b ) If a petition for a definition and standard of identity contains a proposal for a food additive regulation, and the petitioner fails to designate it as such, the Commissioner, upon determining that the petition includes a proposal for a food additive regulation, shall so notify the petitioner and shall thereafter proceed in accordance with the regulations in part 171 of this chapter.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              May-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   May-31-1999
<CASH>                                                  1,788
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          21,580
<ALLOWANCES>                                              890
<INVENTORY>                                           221,707
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      252,785
<PP&E>                                                248,425
<DEPRECIATION>                                        167,511
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        656,058
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 806,862
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                               15,251
<OTHER-SE>                                           (938,637)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          656,058
<SALES>                                               321,311
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      321,311
<CGS>                                                 113,305
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         113,305
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      211,087
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     97,905
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (1,392,340)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         0
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (1,392,340)
<EPS-BASIC>                                              (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            (.10)



</TABLE>
l/\\ ~T~* ' *=»+r-^<^+ PILEDIN 

## O0\ 4-C^^J21^ P*1^"6-1 !STCOURTOFAPPEALS 

## lAc^S-V0'^- ' X —l-\£><^2_°-~2~^^^ HOUSTON.TEXAS MAR 31 2015

£> 

### \- 15" -^ 

# H- XZ W^>*- ^^

^-^•^^ ~-^;p>^»^~T~ «-<=-* ^p-c.

Ga& TIA^ t-^H

# ^ <5- {•• I f. /' / ./ .•: .•> »!; j? / / 

# SAil q b ^ rn tvu -^ !'•'?• PC Si ti §'> D 

### o ©.• ^ 

### £il iu j? 

## S 9 ^ §;, # « •^ H <r «« iV i1- =*.>. V?i .£_ «? g *~ Vf -;-. fa ;;? U Oi



# 4 S ja r 

# ^?3 <r^ /3 

# 4^ ifl o: N CM 0 o r-
§ 1317.85 Ultimate user delivery for the purpose of recall or investigational use of drugs. ( a ) In the event of a product recall, an ultimate user in lawful possession of a controlled substance listed in Schedule II, III, IV, or V may deliver the recalled substance to the manufacturer of the substance or another registrant authorized by the manufacturer to accept recalled controlled substances on the manufacturer's behalf.
( b ) An ultimate user who is participating in an investigational use of drugs pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 355(i) and 360b(j) and wishes to deliver any unused controlled substances received as part of that research to the registered dispenser from which the ultimate user obtained those substances may do so in accordance with regulations promulgated by the Secretary of Health and Human Services pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 355(i) and 360b(j).
#### § 1301.03 Information; special instructions.

Information regarding procedures under these rules and instructions supplementing these rules will be furnished upon request by writing to the Registration Section, Drug Enforcement Administration. See the Table of DEA Mailing Addresses in § 1321.01 of this chapter for the current mailing address.

[75 FR 10676, Mar. 9, 2010]
```

[108th Congress Public Law 261]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ261.108]

[[Page 118 STAT. 695]]

Public Law 108-261
108th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
   410 South Jackson Road in Edinburg, Texas, as the ``Dr. Miguel A. 
 Nevarez Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: June 25, 2004 -  [H.R. 4299]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 410 
South Jackson Road in Edinburg, Texas, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Dr. Miguel A. Nevarez Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Dr. Miguel A. Nevarez Post 
Office Building''.

    Approved June 25, 2004.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4299:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):
            May 11, considered and passed House.
            June 9, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1103 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1103

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the individual 
                        alternative minimum tax.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 23, 2005

Mr. Baucus (for himself, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Kyl, Mr. Schumer, 
   Mr. Crapo, Mr. Pryor, Mr. Jeffords, and Mr. Frist) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the individual 
                        alternative minimum tax.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Individual Alternative Minimum Tax 
Repeal Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF INDIVIDUAL ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX.

    (a) In General.--Section 55(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to alternative minimum tax imposed) is amended by adding at 
the end the following new flush sentence:
``For purposes of this title, the tentative minimum tax on any taxpayer 
other than a corporation for any taxable year beginning after December 
31, 2005, shall be zero.''.
    (b) Modification of Limitation on Use of Credit for Prior Year 
Minimum Tax Liability.--Subsection (c) of section 53 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to credit for prior year minimum tax 
liability) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(c) Limitation.--
            ``(1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), the 
        credit allowable under subsection (a) for any taxable year 
        shall not exceed the excess (if any) of--
                    ``(A) the regular tax liability of the taxpayer for 
                such taxable year reduced by the sum of the credits 
                allowable under subparts A, B, D, E, and F of this 
                part, over
                    ``(B) the tentative minimum tax for the taxable 
                year.
            ``(2) Taxable years beginning after 2005.--In the case of 
        any taxable year beginning after 2005, the credit allowable 
        under subsection (a) to a taxpayer other than a corporation for 
        any taxable year shall not exceed 90 percent of the regular tax 
        liability of the taxpayer for such taxable year reduced by the 
        sum of the credits allowable under subparts A, B, D, E, and F 
        of this part.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2005.
                                 <all>
```
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7222 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow expenses for parents 

to be taken into account as medical expenses, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 5, 2024 

Mr. BUCHANAN (for himself and Mr. THOMPSON of California) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow expenses for parents to be taken into account as medical 

expenses, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Lowering Costs for 

5 Caregivers Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. HEALTH SAVINGS ACCOUNTS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (A) of section 

8 223(d)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amend9 ed by inserting ‘‘, any parent of either such individual or 

10 such spouse’’ after ‘‘the spouse of such individual’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 7222 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall apply to amounts paid after December 

3 31, 2023. 

4 SEC. 3. FLEXIBLE SPENDING AND HEALTH REIMBURSE5 MENT ARRANGEMENTS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (b) of section 105 of 

7 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding 

8 at the end the following: ‘‘A health flexible spending ar9 rangement or health reimbursement arrangement shall not 

10 fail to be treated as meeting the requirements of this sub11 section or section 106, and no amount shall be included 

12 in gross income of the taxpayer, solely because, under the 

13 arrangement, the taxpayer may use amounts contributed 

14 to such arrangement for medical care (as defined in sec15 tion 213(d), without regard to paragraph (1)(D) thereof) 

16 for a parent of the taxpayer or of the spouse of the tax17 payer.’’. 

18 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

19 this section shall apply to expenses incurred after Decem20 ber 31, 2023. 

21 SEC. 4. ARCHER MSAS. 

22 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (A) of section 

23 220(d)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amend24 ed by inserting ‘‘, any parent of either such individual or 

25 such spouse’’ after ‘‘the spouse of such individual’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 7222 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall apply to amounts paid after December 

3 31, 2023. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.16



SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE 
AMGEN INC. EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE PLAN
(AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2009)


The Amgen Inc. Executive Incentive Plan (As Amended and Restated, Effective January 1, 2009) (the “Plan”) is hereby amended, effective January 1, 2017, as follows:


The fourth paragraph of Section VI (DETERMINATION OF AMOUNTS OF AWARDS) shall be deleted and replaced with the following paragraph:


The payment of an award to a Participant with respect to a performance period shall be conditioned upon the Participant's employment by Amgen on the last day of the performance period; provided, however, that in the discretion of the Compensation Committee, awards may be paid to Participants who have retired or whose employment has terminated after the beginning and before the last day of the period for which an award is made, subject to the Participant’s timely execution and non-revocation of a general release and waiver in favor of the Company, its affiliates and related parties in a form provided by the Company.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the discretion of the Compensation Committee, awards may also be paid to Participants to the designee or estate of a Participant who died after the beginning and before the last day of the period for which an award is made.


To record this Second Amendment to the Plan as set forth herein, effective January 1, 2017, Amgen Inc. has caused its authorized officer to execute this document this 14th day of March, 2017.


AMGEN INC.
By:  /s/ Lori A. Johnston   
Lori A. Johnston
Senior Vice President,
Human Resources
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 7614** 

ROBERT E. SAMPSON , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. HIGHLAND COUNTY VA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS; MAYOR, City of Monterey; T.J. DUFF, Highland County Sheriff , Defendants

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Roanoke
. Glen E. Conrad , Chief District Judge. ( 7:15

- cv - 00465

- GEC

- RSB )

Submitted : February 18, 2016 Decided: June 14, 2016

Before WILKINSON, DIAZ, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed and remanded by un published per curiam opinion
.
Robert E. Sampson , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Robert E. Sampson seeks to appeal the di strict court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)( B )(i) (2012). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlo cutory orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949). The order Sampson seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392 , 10 F.3d 1064, 1066

- 67 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and remand the case to the district court with instructions to allow Sampson to file an amended complaint. Se e Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y , 807 F.3d 619, 630 (4th Cir. 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED AND REMANDED
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

P.J-P., a child,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,

Appellee.

No. 4D15-1191

[July 29, 2015]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Rosemarie Scher, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

2015DP300097XXXXMB.

Jan Peter Weiss of Law Offices of Jan Peter Weiss, West Palm Beach, 

for appellant.

Rosemarie Farrell, Orlando, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See O.I.C.L. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 2015 WL 4461164 

(Fla. 4th DCA July 22, 2015).

WARNER, MAY and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Editorial Note on Part 177
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 177 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 70 FR 72074, Dec. 1, 2005; and 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 177.1670 Polyvinyl alcohol film. Polyvinyl alcohol film may be safely used in contact with food of the types identified in § 176.170(c) of this chapter, table 1, under Types V, VIII, and IX, in accordance with the following prescribed conditions: ( a ) The polyvinyl alcohol film is produced from polyvinyl alcohol having a minimum viscosity of 4 centipoises when a 4-percent aqueous solution is tested at 20 °C.
( b ) The finished food-contact film for use in contact with Food Types V or IX, when extracted with the solvent characterizing the type of food and under the conditions of time and temperature characterizing its intended use as determined from tables 1 and 2 of § 176.170(c) of this chapter, yields total extractives not to exceed 0.078 milligram per square centimeter (0.5 milligram per square inch) of food-contact surface when tested by ASTM method F34-76 (Reapproved 1980), “Standard Test Method for Liquid Extraction of Flexible Barrier Materials,” which is incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the American Society for Testing Materials, 100 Barr Harbor Dr., West Conshohocken, Philadelphia, PA 19428-2959, or may be examined at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .*
( c ) The finished food-contact film shall not be used as a component of food containers intended for use in contact with water.
[42 FR 14572, Mar. 15, 1977, as amended at 49 FR 10110, Mar. 19, 1984]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Human Genome Research Institute Special Emphasis Panel, GWAS Comparing Design Approaches for Sequencing Disease.                    

*Date:*                         March 11, 2010.                    

*Time:*                         12 p.m. to 3 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, NHGRI Twinbrook Library, 5635 Fishers Lane, Bethesda, MD 20892-9306.                     

*Contact Person:*                         Keith McKenney, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, NHGRI, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 4076, Bethesda, MD 20814, 301-594-4280,                         *mckenneyk@mail.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.172, Human Genome Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 17, 2010.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-3739 Filed 2-23-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Improved Administration Can Enhance U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection Classified 

Laptop Computer Security 

Unclassified Summary 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY 

Office of Inspector General 

Office of Information Technology 

 OIG-06-64 September 2006 
Office of Inspector General 

U.S. Department of Homeland Security 

Washington, DC 20528

Improved Administration Can Enhance U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection Classified Laptop Computer Security 

Unclassified Summary 

OIG-06-64 

We audited the Department of Homeland Security and its organizational components’ security 

programs to evaluate the security and integrity of select government-issued laptop computers. The 

report assesses the strengths and weaknesses of security controls over U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP) classified laptop computers. Our objective was to determine whether CBP had 

established and implemented adequate and effective security policies and procedures related to the 

physical security of and logical access to its classified government-issued laptop computers. To 

secure CBP data stored on classified government-issued laptop computers, we made three 

recommendations to the Commissioner for CBP. 
Additional Information and Copies 

To obtain additional copies of this report, call the Office of Inspector General 

(OIG) at (202) 254-4100, fax your request to (202) 254-4285, or visit the OIG 

web site at www.dhs.gov.

OIG Hotline 

To report alleged fraud, waste, abuse or mismanagement, or any other kind 

of criminal or noncriminal misconduct relative to department programs or 

operations, call the OIG Hotline at 1-800-323-8603; write to Department of 

Homeland Security, Washington, DC 20528, Attn: Office of Inspector 

General, Investigations Division – Hotline. The OIG seeks to protect the 

identity of each writer and caller.