alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### GOLDIE *v.*BAY CIRCUIT JUDGE.

Costs — Modification of Order — Discretion of Trial Court.

In denying a motion for a judgment of nonsuit for failure to pay costs, the trial court modified the order by providing that plaintiff might file an approved bond as security for the payment of the accrued and any costs thereafter accruing in favor of defendants, all to be paid on the final disposition of the cause. *Held,*that the failure to pay the costs within the time limited did not give to the order the effect of a final order, or exhaust the discretion of the trial court as to its modification.

Mandamus by William Goldie and another to compel Chester L. Collins, circuit judge of Bay county, to vacate an order denying a motion for a judgment of nonsuit.

Submitted January 12, 1909.

(Calendar No. 23,2261⁄2.)

Application denied February 2, 1909.

*Cooley & Hewitt,*for relators.

Blair, C. J.

Charles Clark having recovered a judgment as administrator against petitioners, they secured a reversal thereof in this court November 7,1906. *Clark*v. *Goldie,*146 Mich. 303. November 26th costs of this court *425were taxed in favor of petitioners at the sum of $204.51. March 6, 1908, an order was entered in the circuit court staying proceedings until such costs were paid, with ‘£ leave to pay the same at any time before the first day of the next ensuing term of this court.” The next term of said court commenced on the 12th day of May. On the 9th day of May counsel for plaintiff moved to set aside the order of March 6th. This motion was denied May 23, 1908, and the order denying the motion was on the 2d day of November, 1908, affirmed by this court. *Clark*v. *Bay Circuit Judge,*154 Mich. 483.

The costs remaining unpaid, petitioners moved in the circuit court for a judgment of nonsuit. On the 2d day of January, 1909, an order was entered “that plaintiff have 30 days, from and including this day, in which to file an approved bond as security for the payment of the accrued and any costs hereafter accruing in favor of defendants, all such costs to be paid on the final disposition of the said cause. It is further ordered that on the filing of such approved bond said motion be denied.” Petitioners apply to this court for an order requiring the respondent to show cause why the last order should not be vacated and an order of nonsuit entered.

We held in the case of *Clark*v. *Bay Circuit*Judge, supra, that the order staying proceedings and requiring payment of the costs was not a final order. We are also of the opinion that the failure to pay the costs within the time limited <lid not give to the order the effect of a final order, or exhaust the discretion of the circuit judge to modify the order.

The application is denied, with costs.

Grant, Montgomery, Ostrander, and Hooker, JJ.. concurred.
#### § 1311.35 Number of CSOS digital certificates needed.

A purchaser of Schedule I and II controlled substances must obtain a separate CSOS certificate for each registered location for which the purchaser will order these controlled substances.
Editorial Note on Part 13
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 13 appear at 88 FR 45065, July 14, 2023.

§ 13.5 Notice of a hearing before a Board. If the Commissioner determines that a Board should be established to conduct a hearing on any matter, a notice of hearing will be published in the Federal Register setting forth the following information: ( a ) If the hearing is under § 13.1 (a) or (b), all applicable information described in § 12.32(e). ( 1 ) Any written document that is to be the subject matter of the hearing will be published as a part of the notice, or the notice will refer to it if the document has already been published in the Federal Register or state that the document is available from the Dockets Management Staff or an agency employee designated in the notice.
( 2 ) For purposes of a hearing under § 13.1 (a) or (b), all participants who file a notice of participation under § 12.32(e)(6)(ii) are deemed to be parties and entitled to participate in selection of the Board under § 13.15(b).
( b ) If the hearing is in lieu of a formal evidentiary hearing, as provided in § 13.1(c), all of the information described in § 12.32(e).
[44 FR 22348, Apr. 13, 1979, as amended at 47 FR 26375, June 18, 1982]
WAKIL L. GORDON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-1133

_____________________________/

Opinion filed October 6, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Tatiana Salvador, Judge.

Wakil L. Gordon, pro se, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

VAN NORTWICK, WETHERELL, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.
#### § 960.3 Implementation guidelines.

The guidelines of this subpart establish the procedure and basis for applying the postclosure and the preclosure guidelines of subparts C and D, respectively, to evaluations of the suitability of sites. As may be appropriate during the siting process, this procedure requires consideration of a variety of geohydrologic settings and rock types, regionality, and environmental impacts and consultation with affected States, affected Indian tribes, and Federal agencies.

[49 FR 47752, Dec. 6, 1984, as amended at 66 FR 57334, Nov. 14, 2001]
SERVED: 

### January 29, 2014 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICEOFHEARINGS 

## i 

# 'ECE'VE".D

WASHINGTON, DC 

## J
.. , · I

IN THE MATTER OF:

ABO SUPPLY LLC FDMS NO. FAA-2013-0713 

## JAN 302014 

## HEARING DOCKET

DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR ALLOWANCE TO RESPOND TO "COMPAINANT'SMOTIONFORDECISION" OUT OF TIME OnbehalfofABO Supply LLC ("ABO"), Defendant in this action, we hereby move the Courtto accept Defendant's Reponse to Complainant's Motion for Decision Out ofTime. Complainant, on January 9, 2014, filed its Motion For Decision. Complainant served
··. notice ofsame and that notice was received by Defendant's counsel (undersigned), but

misfiled inthat same instant. As a result, the deadline was not noted or docketed and this error deprives the Court ofa timely response specifically addressing, countering, challenging, and documenting crucial relevant facts that this Court should have before it in considering Complainant's Motion. WHEREFORE, onbehalfofABO, we hereby respectfully request that the Court accept Defendant's proffered Response and attached Exhibits submitted this date.

c' Givens & Johns n, PLLC Attorneys for ABO Supply LLC 950 Echo Lane, Suite 360 Houston, TX 77024 713-932-1540 713-932-1542 fax
# EUR-Lex - 31989L0186 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31989L0186

**Council Directive 89/186/EEC of 6 March 1989 amending Annex II to Directive 76/895/EEC relating to the fixing of maximum levels for pesticide residues in and on fruit and vegetables **

*
Official Journal L 066 , 10/03/1989 P. 0036 - 0036 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 28 P. 0172 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 28 P. 0172 *

*****

COUNCIL DIRECTIVE

of 6 March 1989

amending Annex II to Directive 76/895/EEC relating to the fixing of maximum levels for pesticide residues in and on fruit and vegetables

(89/186/EEC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 76/895/EEC of 23 November 1976 relating to the fixing of maximum levels for pesticide residues in and on fruit and vegetables (1), as last amended by Directive 88/298/EEC (2), and in particular Article 5 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission (3),

Whereas Article 5 of Directive 76/895/EEC lays down that the Annexes thereto shall be amended taking account in particular of technical and scientific progress as well as of the requirements of health and agriculture;

Whereas, in the light of the developments in technical and scientific knowledge, it is appropriate that Annex II to the said Directive be brought up to date by adding to it particulars concerning the pesticide maleic hydrazide, which may well be present as a residue in fruit and vegetables,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:

Article 1

In Annex II to Directive 76/895/EEC, the following pesticide residue, together with its corresponding particulars, shall be inserted in the table:

1,2.3 // // // Pesticide residues // Maximum levels (in mg/kg (ppm)) // 1.2.3 // Common name // Chemical formula // // // // // maleic hydrazide // 6-hydroxy-3(2H)-pyridazinone // 10: Onions 1: Other products

// // // Article 2

Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Article 1 by 1 August 1989. They shall forthwith inform the Commission thereof.

Article 3

This Directive is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 6 March 1989.

For the Council

The President

C. ROMERO HERRERA
787 P.2d 455

#### Mike C. MOLINAR, Petitioner, v. STATE of New Mexico, Respondent.

No. 18989.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Feb. 27, 1990.

Rehearing Denied March 20, 1990.

Jacquelyn Robins, Chief Public Defender, Peter Rames, Asst. Appellate Defender, Santa Fe, for petitioner.

Hal Stratton, Atty. Gen., Gail MacQuesten, Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for respondent.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, Mike C. Molinar, has petitioned us for a writ of certiorari, seeking reversal of his conviction in *State v. Molinar,*Ct.App. No. 10, 982, November 11, 1989, Apodaca, J., dissenting. We granted his petition, and have issued the writ. Upon review of the case, we find that Molinar was a co-defendant with Terry Callaway in the latter's trial. *See State v. Callaway,*Ct.App. No. 10,966, November 7, 1989, Apodaca, J., dissenting, *reversed, Callaway v. State,*109 N.M. 416, 785 P.2d 1035 (1990), Baca, J., dissenting. As in *Callaway,*petitioner objected to the trial court’s *sua sponte*order of mistrial. We thus conclude that petitioner's second trial was constitutionally invalid, for the same reasons we gave in *Callaway.*

Accordingly, we reverse the court of appeals in No. 10,982, and remand the case to the district court with instructions to discharge petitioner from custody.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BACA, J., dissents.
# EUR-Lex - 31993R3518 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31993R3518

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 3518/93 of 21 December 1993 adjusting the code of a product referred to in Article 1 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 404/93 on the common organization of the market in bananas **

*
Official Journal L 320 , 22/12/1993 P. 0015 - 0015 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 54 P. 0073 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 54 P. 0073 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 3518/93 of 21 December 1993 adjusting the code of a product referred to in Article 1 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 404/93 on the common organization of the market in bananas

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 234/79 of 5 February 1979 on the procedure for adjusting the Common Customs Tariff nomenclature used for agricultural products (1), as amended by Regulation (EEC) No 3209/89 (2), and in particular Article 2 (1) thereof,

Whereas Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2505/92 of 14 July 1992 amending Annexes I and II to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (3), contains the combined nomenclature currently in force;

Whereas the combined nomenclature code used to describe frozen bananas in Article 1 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 404/93 (4) is the code that was in force in 1992, and does not correspond to that in force since 1993; whereas, as a result, that code should be adjusted;

Whereas this adjustment should take effect on the date of entry into force of the aforementioned Regulation;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Bananas,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In Article 1 (2) of Regulation (EEC) No 404/93, the description of goods under CN code 'ex 0811 90 90 Frozen bananas', is hereby replaced by 'ex 0811 90 99 Frozen bananas'.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

It shall apply with effect from 1 July 1993.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 21 December 1993.

For the Commission

René STEICHEN

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 34, 9. 2. 1979, p. 2.

(2) OJ No L 312, 27. 10. 1989, p. 5.

(3) OJ No L 267, 14. 9. 1992, p. 1.

(4) OJ No L 47, 25. 2. 1993, p. 1.
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 974 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Myositis Awareness Day. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 28, 2006 

Mr. ISRAEL (for himself and Ms. FOXX) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Myositis 

Awareness Day. 

Whereas an estimated 30,000 to 50,000 people are affected 

by myositis in the United States, many of whom remain 

undiagnosed or misdiagnosed; 

Whereas myositis is a general term used to describe swelling 

of the muscles, but the effects of the inflammatory 

myopathies (often referred to as ‘‘myositis’’) are much 

more severe than just inflammation; 

Whereas myositis patients suffer from their immune systems 

attacking their body’s own normal, healthy tissue, resulting in inflammation or swelling; 

Whereas inflammatory myopathies are thought to be autoimmune diseases, such that the body’s immune system, 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 974 IH 

which normally fights infections and viruses, does not 

stop fighting once the infection or virus is gone; 

Whereas myositis can cause muscle weakness, and patients 

often live in chronic pain and have long-term health problems that lead to permanent disability; 

Whereas myositis is difficult to diagnose and treatment is 

often delayed, resulting in unnecessary suffering; 

Whereas many patients with treatable forms of myositis often 

have severe long-term disabilities because of failure to diagnose and/or treat the disease correctly; 

Whereas some myositis patients will die at a much earlier age 

than they would have if they had received the proper 

care, particularly for the children who have permanent 

scarring and deformities due to failure to treat properly; 

Whereas The Myositis Association, the national patient advocacy organization serving the myositis patient community, focuses its efforts on public policy, research funding, 

patient services, and public awareness and education related to developing effective treatments and a cure for 

myositis; 

Whereas a National Myositis Awareness Day would educate 

communities across the Nation about myositis and the 

need for research funding, accurate diagnosis, and effective treatments; and 

Whereas it would be appropriate to observe September 21, 

2006, as National Myositis Awareness Day: Now, therefore, be it 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 974 IH 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

2 the goals and ideals of a National Myositis Awareness 

3 Day. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
#### § 111.303 What are the requirements under this subpart J for written procedures?

You must establish and follow written procedures for laboratory operations, including written procedures for the tests and examinations that you conduct to determine whether specifications are met.
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 91

Honoring the life and legacy of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2005

Mr. RAHALL (for himself, Mr. ISSA, Mr. LAHOOD, Mr. BOUSTANY, and Mr. 

DINGELL) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on International Relations 

RESOLUTION

Honoring the life and legacy of former Lebanese Prime 

Minister Rafik Hariri.

Whereas Rafik Hariri, an esteemed leader and public servant, 

was born in Sidon, Lebanon, on November 1, 1944; 

Whereas Rafik Hariri served the people of Lebanon as a chief 

mediator between Lebanese militias during the 1983 Geneva and 1984 Lebanese reconciliation conferences; 

Whereas, under his deep commitment to a united Lebanon, 

Rafik Hariri was a primary architect of the Taif national 

reconciliation accords of 1989, which put an end to the 

Lebanese civil war; 

Whereas, as an enormously successful businessman and devoted countryman, Rafik Hariri instituted several reconstruction and investment efforts to help rebuild Lebanon 
2

•HRES 91 IH 

and restore its status as a center of business, finance, 

and tourism; 

Whereas, as the elected Prime Minister of Lebanon for three 

consecutive terms from 1992 to 1998 and then two more 

from 2000 to 2004, Rafik Hariri continued his steadfast 

dedication to Lebanese unity and economic development, 

having attracted several foreign investments; 

Whereas, Rafik Hariri was a man committed to humanitarian 

causes, he founded several philanthropic, humanitarian, 

and educational foundations in Lebanon, Jordan, and 

Saudi Arabia to provide educational and medical assistance to the needy; 

Whereas Rafik Hariri was held in the highest regard by the 

international community and met personally with President Bush to discuss U.S.-Lebanese relations as recently 

as 2002; and 

Whereas Rafik Hariri’s exemplary leadership shall serve as a 

model for the world community and he will be deeply 

missed by world leaders after the news that he was killed 

February 14, 2005, in Beirut, Lebanon: Now, therefore, 

be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) condemns the heinous act that killed former 

3 Prime Minister Rafik Hariri in the strongest pos4 sible terms; 

5 (2) extends its deepest sympathy and condo6 lences to the family of former Prime Minister Rafik 

7 Hariri and to all the people of Lebanon in this mo8 ment of tragedy; 
3

•HRES 91 IH 

1 (3) expresses its admiration for the historic 

2 contributions made by Rafik Hariri over his long 

3 and distinguished career of public service; and 

4 (4) reaffirms its commitment to the process of 

5 building a just and lasting peace in the Middle East.

Æ
NUMBER 13-15-00496-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

BRENDA W. HUGHES, Appellant,

v.

DAN A. HUGHES, Appellee.

On Appeal from the 36th District Court 

of Bee County, Texas.

ORDER

Before Justices Benavides, Perkes, and Longoria

Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on a motion by appellant’s counsel to review the 

sealed reporter’s record. On October 13, 2015, the trial court issued an order sealing 

court records. The order states that all documents containing the trial court number, 

except those documents that are required by law to be recorded in the minutes of the 

court, are sealed and shall not be opened or released except on appropriate court order, 
2

other than to attorneys of record for a party and the parties themselves. The reporter’s 

record, including exhibits, was filed under seal on February 25, 2016. Appellant’s

counsel is requesting to withdraw the reporter’s record and exhibits.

The Court GRANTS counsel’s motion to review the sealed reporter’s record. 

Appellant’s counsel is ordered to agree and to abide by the sealing order of the trial court. 

The Court ORDERS counsel to treat the CDRom as confidential and to safeguard it as an 

official and original court document. Counsel is ordered to maintain the confidentiality of 

the information contained in this sealed record and is prohibited from disseminating the 

sensitive information contained within the sealed record to any person. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

9

th day of May, 2016.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OCTOBER 13, 2023

NO. 03-23-00409-CV

Queen Graphics & Printworks Inc., Appellant

v.

Eric Guerra d/b/a Lonestar Mailing Solutions, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES KELLY AND THEOFANIS

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on December 19, 2022. Having 

reviewed the record, the Court holds that appellant has not prosecuted its appeal and did not 

comply with a notice from the Clerk of this Court. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for 

want of prosecution. Appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and 

in the court below.
§ 1314.40 Self-certification. ( a ) A regulated seller must submit to the Administration the self-certification referred to in § 1314.35(a) in order to sell any scheduled listed chemical product. The certification is not effective for purposes of this section unless, in addition to provisions regarding the training of individuals referred to in § 1314.35(a), the certification includes a statement that the regulated seller understands each of the requirements that apply under this part and agrees to comply with the requirements.
( b ) When a regulated seller files the initial self-certification, the Administration will assign the regulated seller to one of twelve groups. The expiration date of the self-certification for all regulated sellers in any group will be the last day of the month designated for that group. In assigning a regulated seller to a group, the Administration may select a group with an expiration date that is not less than 12 months or more than 23 months from the date of the self-certification. After the initial certification period, the regulated seller must update the self-certifications annually.
( c ) The regulated seller must provide a separate certification for each place of business at which the regulated seller sells scheduled listed chemical products at retail.