alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 107
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 107 appear at 81 FR 49895, July 29, 2016.

§ 107.240 Notification requirements. ( a ) *Telephone report.* When a determination is made that an infant formula is to be recalled, the recalling firm shall telephone within 24 hours the appropriate Food and Drug Administration district office listed in § 5.115 of this chapter and shall provide relevant information about the infant formula that is to be recalled.
( b ) *Initial written report.* Within 14 days after the recall has begun, the recalling firm shall provide a written report to the appropriate FDA district office. The report shall contain relevant information, including the following cumulative information concerning the infant formula that is being recalled: ( 1 ) Number of consignees notified of the recall and date and method of notification, including recalls required by § 107.200, information about the notice provided for retail display, and the request for its display.
( 2 ) Number of consignees responding to the recall communication and quantity of recalled infant formula on hand at each consignee at the time the communication was received.
( 3 ) Quantity of recalled infant formula returned or corrected by each consignee contacted and the quantity of recalled infant formula accounted for.
( 4 ) Number and results of effectiveness checks that were made.
( 5 ) Estimated timeframes for completion of the recall.
( c ) *Status reports.* The recalling firm shall submit to the appropriate FDA district office a written status report on the recall at least every 14 days until the recall is terminated. The status report shall describe the steps taken by the recalling firm to carry out the recall since the last report and the results of these steps.
[79 FR 8074, Feb. 10, 2014]
# m8814.docx

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 07.03.2018 C(2018) 1525 final PUBLIC VERSION To the notifying party Subject : Case M. 8814 - Melrose/GKN Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 1 and Article 57 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area 2 Dear Sir or Madam, 1. On 9 February 2018 , the European Commission received notification of a proposed conc entration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which Melrose Industries plc ('Melrose', United Kingdom) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of GKN plc ('GKN', United Kingdom) by way of public bid. 3 2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are: - for Melrose: acquisition of high quality manufacturing business with exposure to strong end markets and provision of management services with the view of profiting from their eventual sale. Currently, Melrose has two operating business: ( i ) Brush Electrical Machines that provides products and services for the energy sector; and (ii) Nortek Inc that manufactures air management products, heating and cooling systems, wireless security, home automation and personal safety systems , - for GKN: GKN is a global engineering group and its activities are focused on the automotive, aerospace, powder metallurgy systems and wheels and structures for off-highway vehicles. 3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5 ( b ) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 . 4 4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation and Article 57 of the EEA Agreement . For the Commission (signed)
Johannes LAITENBERGER Director - General
(1)
OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ( the ' Merger Regulation ' ). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( ' TFEU ' ) has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of ' Community ' by ' Union ' and ' common market ' by ' internal market ' . The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.
(2) OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3 ( the ' EEA Agreement ' ).
(3) Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 62 , 17.2.2018 , p. 6 .
(4)
OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5 .
§ 1.508 What corrective actions must I take under my FSVP? ( a ) You must promptly take appropriate corrective actions if you determine that a foreign supplier of food you import does not produce the food in compliance with processes and procedures that provide at least the same level of public health protection as those required under section 418 or 419 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, if either is applicable, and the implementing regulations, or produces food that is adulterated under section 402 or misbranded under section 403(w) (if applicable) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. This determination could be based on a review of consumer, customer, or other complaints related to food safety, the verification activities conducted under § 1.506 or § 1.511(c), a reevaluation of the risks posed by the food and the foreign supplier's performance conducted under § 1.505(c) or (d), or any other relevant information you obtain. The appropriate corrective actions will depend on the circumstances but could include discontinuing use of the foreign supplier until the cause or causes of noncompliance, adulteration, or misbranding have been adequately addressed. You must document any corrective actions you take in accordance with this paragraph.
( b ) If you determine, by means other than the verification activities conducted under § 1.506 or § 1.511(c) or a reevaluation conducted under § 1.505(c) or (d), that a foreign supplier of food that you import does not produce food in compliance with processes and procedures that provide at least the same level of public health protection as those required under section 418 or 419 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, if either is applicable, and the implementing regulations, or produces food that is adulterated under section 402 or misbranded under section 403(w) (if applicable) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, you must promptly investigate to determine whether your FSVP is adequate and, when appropriate, modify your FSVP. You must document any investigations, corrective actions, and changes to your FSVP that you undertake in accordance with this paragraph.
( c ) This section does not limit your obligations with respect to other laws enforced by FDA, such as those relating to product recalls.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

WILLIE JAY YOUNG , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee.

No. 4D 20

- 2063

[ March 18, 2021 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.8 50 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; Charles A. Schwab

, Judge; L.T. Case No

. 56

- 20 13

- CF

- 00 0798 A

.
Marquan M. Tate

, Carrabelle , pro se

.
No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

M AY , D AMOORGIAN and K LINGENSMITH , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### § 1402.2 Responsibility.

All requests for the mandatory declassification review of classified information in ONDCP files should be addressed to the Security Officer, Office of National Drug Control Policy, Executive Office of the President, Washington, DC 20500, who will acknowledge receipt of the request. When a request does not reasonably describe the information sought, the requester shall be notified that unless additional information is provided, or the scope of the request is narrowed, no further action will be taken.
**EXHIBIT23.1**

 

**Consentof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

** **

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-3Nos. 333-137073 and 333-141914) of Hospitality Properties Trust and in therelated Prospectuses of our reports dated February 21, 2008, with respectto the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Hospitality PropertiesTrust and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting ofHospitality Properties Trust, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)for the year ended December 31, 2007.

 
|                    | /s/  Ernst & Young LLP |
|-------------------------|---------------------------------|
|                    |
| Boston,  Massachusetts  |
| February 21,  2008 |

 

----
#### § 1250.81 Inspection.

The Commissioner of Food and Drugs may inspect such vessels to determine compliance with the requirements of this subpart.

[40 FR 5624, Feb. 6, 1975, as amended at 48 FR 11432, Mar. 18, 1983]
H. Res. 957

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

July 27, 2006.

Resolved,

SECTION 1. REPAIR OF MACE OF HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. 

(a) DELIVERY FOR REPAIR.—The Sergeant at Arms of 

the House of Representatives is authorized and directed, on 

behalf of the House of Representatives, to deliver the mace 

of the House of Representatives, following an adjournment of 

the House pursuant to concurrent resolution, to the Secretary 

of the Smithsonian Institution only for the purpose of having 

necessary repairs made to the mace and under such circumstances as will assure that the mace is properly safeguarded. 

(b) RETURN.—The mace shall be returned to the House 

of Representatives before noon on the day before the House 

next reconvenes pursuant to concurrent resolution or at any 
2

•HRES 957 EH 

sooner time when so directed by the Speaker of the House 

of Representatives. 

Attest:

Clerk.
###### Editorial Note on Part 14

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 14 appear at 88 FR 45065, July 14, 2023.

#### § 14.172 Utilization of an advisory committee at the request of an interested person.

Any interested person may request, under § 10.30, that a specific matter relating to a particular human prescription drug be submitted to an appropriate advisory committee for a hearing and review and recommendations. The request must demonstrate the importance of the matter and the reasons why it should be submitted for a hearing at that time. The Commissioner may grant or deny the request.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

April 23, 2012 

p0416 

Order 

 

April 23, 2012 

143741 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 143741 

 COA: 297658 

Oakland CC: 2009-227905-FH 

DAMON ROSHAWN HORNER, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 26, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Editorial Note on Part 112
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 112 appear at 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 112.21 What requirements apply regarding qualifications and training for personnel who handle (contact) covered produce or food contact surfaces? All of the following requirements apply regarding qualifications and training for personnel who handle (contact) covered produce or food contact surfaces: ( a ) All personnel (including temporary, part time, seasonal, and contracted personnel) who handle covered produce or food contact surfaces, or who are engaged in the supervision thereof, must receive adequate training, as appropriate to the person's duties, upon hiring, and periodically thereafter, at least once annually.
( b ) All personnel (including temporary, part time, seasonal, and contracted personnel) who handle covered produce or food contact surfaces, or who are engaged in the supervision thereof, must have a combination of education, training, and experience necessary to perform the person's assigned duties in a manner that ensures compliance with this part.
( c ) Training must be conducted in a manner that is easily understood by personnel being trained.
( d ) Training must be repeated as necessary and appropriate in light of observations or information indicating that personnel are not meeting standards established by FDA in subparts C through O of this part.
§ 1312.41 Hearings generally. ( a ) In any case where the Administrator shall hold a hearing regarding the denial of an application for an import, export or transshipment permit, the procedures for such hearing shall be governed generally by the adjudication procedures set forth in the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 551-559) and specifically by sections 1002 and 1003 of the Act (21 U.S.C. 952 and 953), by §§ 1312.42-1312.47, and by the procedures for administrative hearings under the Act set forth in §§ 1316.41-1316.67 of this chapter.
( b ) [Reserved]
[36 FR 23625, Dec. 11, 1971, as amended at 37 FR 15923, Aug. 8, 1972. Redesignated at 38 FR 26609, Sept. 24, 1973]
§ 114.3 Definitions. For the purposes of this part, the following definitions apply. ( a ) *Acid foods* means foods that have a natural pH of 4.6 or below.
( b ) *Acidified foods* means low-acid foods to which acid(s) or acid food(s) are added; these foods include, but are not limited to, beans, cucumbers, cabbage, artichokes, cauliflower, puddings, peppers, tropical fruits, and fish, singly or in any combination. They have a water activity (aw) greater than 0.85 and have a finished equilibrium pH of 4.6 or below. These foods may be called, or may purport to be, “pickles” or “pickled ______.” Carbonated beverages, jams, jellies, preserves, acid foods (including such foods as standardized and nonstandardized food dressings and condiment sauces) that contain small amounts of low-acid food(s) and have a resultant finished equilibrium pH that does not significantly differ from that of the predominant acid or acid food, and foods that are stored, distributed, and retailed under refrigeration are excluded from the coverage of this part.
( c ) *Lot* means the product produced during a period indicated by a specific code.
( d ) *Low-acid foods* means any foods, other than alcoholic beverages, with a finished equilibrium pH greater than 4.6 and a water activity (aw) greater than 0.85. Tomatoes and tomato products having a finished equilibrium pH less than 4.7 are not classed as low-acid foods.
( e ) *Scheduled process* means the process selected by a processor as adequate for use under the conditions of manufacture for a food in achieving and maintaining a food that will not permit the growth of microorganisms having public health significance. It includes control of pH and other critical factors equivalent to the process established by a competent processing authority.
( f ) *Shall* is used to state mandatory requirements.
( g ) *Should* is used to state recommended or advisory procedures or to identify recommended equipment.
( h ) *Water activity* (aw) is a measure of the free moisture in a product and is the quotient of the water vapor pressure of the substance divided by the vapor pressure of pure water at the same temperature.
[44 FR 16235, Mar. 16, 1979, as amended at 61 FR 14245, Apr. 1, 1996]
H. Res. 412 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 27, 2017. 

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is 

hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES: Mr. Walz. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 16

- 00662

- CV

Melissa FUENTES , Individually, and as Next Friend of Victor Robert Fuentes and Isabella

Elaine Fuentes, Minors,

Appellant

v.

TEXAS MUTUAL INSURAN CE CO.

, Appellee

From the 112th Judicial District Court, Sutton County, Texas

Trial Court No. 5910

Honorable Pedro Gomez, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE MARTINEZ , AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial cour t’s Order on Motions for

Summary Judgment is AFFIRMED

.

It is ORDERED that appellee recover its costs of this appeal from appellant.

SIGNED November 1, 2017.

_____________________________ Irene Rios, Justice
<PAGE>


               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sorrento Networks Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-Q"), I,
Phillip W. Arneson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 'SS'1350, as adopted pursuant to 'SS'906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
          78o(d)); and

     (2)  The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated:  September 15, 2003

                   /s/ PHILLIP W. ARNESON
        -------------------------------------------
Name:   Phillip W. Arneson, Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Sorrento Networks Corporation and
will be retained by Sorrento Networks Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 1250.40 Applicability.

The sanitary equipment and facilities on land and air conveyances engaged in interstate traffic and the use of such equipment and facilities shall comply with the requirements prescribed in this subpart.
# STATEOFLOUISIANA

COURTOFAPPEAL,FIRSTCIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 

### 2022 KW 0342 VERSUS PRESTON G. DEMOUCHET, JR. JULY 5, 

### 2022

In Re: Preston G. Demouchet, Jr., 

### applying for supervisory writs, 16th Judicial District Court, Parish of St. 

### Mary, No. 95- 141810.
BEFORE: McCLENDON, WELCH, AND HESTER, JJ.

WRIT DENIED. 

## A conviction may not be collaterally attacked through a motion to correct an illegal sentence. See La. Code Crim. P. art. 

### 881. 5. It 

## is well established that a pleading is construed for what it really is and not for what it is labeled. Rochon v. 

### Young, 2008- 1349 ( La. 

### App. 1st Cir. 

### 2/ 13/09), 6 

### So.3d 890, 

### 892, writ denied, 2009-0745 ( La. 1/29/ 10), 25 So.3d 824. If the 

### inmate files a pleading that requests postconviction relief, the pleading should be treated as such, 

## including the application of the time limit of article 

### 930. 8. See State v. Jarrow, 2004- 0483 ( La. 

### 9/24/04), 

### 882 So.2d 1160. PMC JEW CHH

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
l

# 0 DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
§ 1114.1 Scope. ( a ) This part sets forth the procedures and requirements for submitting a premarket tobacco product application (PMTA), the general procedures FDA will follow when evaluating a PMTA, and postmarket reporting requirements.
( b ) This part does not apply to modified risk tobacco product applications, except that single applications seeking both a marketing granted order under section 910(c) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and an order under section 911(g) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act must satisfy the requirements of this part in addition to the requirements of section 911 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
( c ) References in this part to regulatory sections of the Code of Federal Regulations are to chapter I of title 21, unless otherwise noted.
( d ) This part does not apply to “premium” cigars as defined in § 1114.3.
<PAGE>
 
                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

                                   ----------


           We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statement of Seer Technologies, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 33-97856 and
33-97858) of our report dated October 24, 1997, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements of Seer Technologies, Inc., as of September
30, 1997, and for the years ended September 30, 1997, 1996 and 1995, which
report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


                                              /s/ COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
Washington, D.C.
December 29, 1997






                                     E-18