75464 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 232 / Friday, December 2, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 

3.2 Signature Required 

The addressee’s (or agent’s) signature 

is required for all Express Mail Custom 

Designed service. 

* * * * * 

500 Additional Mailing Services 

503 Extra Services 

1.0 Extra Services for Express Mail 

1.1 Available Services 

* * * * * 

1.1.6 COD 

[Revise 1.1.6 by adding a new last 

sentence as follows:] 

* * * A signature is required for COD 

service. 

1.1.7 Insurance and Indemnity 

Express Mail is insured against loss, 

damage, or missing contents, subject to 

these standards: 

* * * * * 

[Revise item 1.1.7b as follows:] 

b. All Express Mail signed for by the 

addressee or the addressee’s agent 

constitutes a valid delivery, and no 

indemnity for loss is paid. For Express 

Mail items not requiring a signature, a 

delivered scan event constitutes a valid 

delivery, and no indemnity for loss is 

paid. 

* * * * * 

1.1.8 Additional Insurance 

[Revise the last sentence of 1.1.8 as 

follows:] 

* * * When ‘‘signature required’’ 

service is not requested, or when 

‘‘waiver of signature’’ is requested 

additional insurance is not available. 

* * * * * 

12.0 Collect on Delivery (COD) 

* * * * * 

12.2 Basic Information 

* * * * * 

12.2.5 Express Mail COD 

[Revise the first sentence of 12.2.5 as 

follows:] 

Any article sent COD also may be sent 

by Express Mail Next Day and Express 

Mail Second Day service when a 

signature is requested. * * * 

* * * * * 

600 Basic Standards for All Mailing 

Services 

601 Mailability 

* * * * * 

11.0 Cigarettes and Smokeless 

Tobacco 

* * * * * 

11.5 Exception for Business/ 

Regulatory Purposes 

* * * * * 

11.5.2 Mailing 

* * * All mailings under the 

business/regulatory purposes exception 

must: 

[Revise item 11.5.2a as follows:] 

a. Be entered in a face-to-face 

transaction with a postal employee as 

Express Mail with Hold For Pickup 

service (Carrier Pickup service not 

permitted); 

* * * * * 

11.6 Exception for Certain Individuals 

* * * * * 

11.6.2 Mailing 

No customer may send or cause to be 

sent more than 10 mailings under this 

exception in any 30-day period. Each 

mailing under the certain individuals 

exception must: 

[Revise item 11.6.2a as follows:] 

a. Be entered as Express Mail with an 

Adult Signature extra service (see 

503.8.0), or Express Mail with Hold For 

Pickup service (Carrier Pickup service 

not permitted); unless shipped to APO/ 

FPO/DPO addresses under 11.6.4. 

* * * * * 

11.7 Consumer Testing Exception 

* * * * * 

11.7.2 Mailing 

* * * Mailings must be tendered 

under the following conditions: 

* * * * * 

b. All mailings under the consumer 

testing exception: 

[Revise 11.7.2b1 as follows:] 

1. Must be entered in face-to-face 

transactions with postal employees as 

Express Mail with Hold For Pickup 

service requested (Carrier Pickup 

service not permitted); 

* * * * * 

604 Postage Payment Methods 

* * * * * 

9.0 Refunds and Exchanges 

* * * * * 

9.5 Express Mail Postage Refund 

* * * * * 

9.5.2 Conditions for Refund 

[Revise 9.5.2 to change the refund 

request days from 90 to 30 days, and 

consolidate the text in the introductory 

paragraph and items a and b as 

follows:] 

A postage refund request must be 

made within 30 days after the date of 

mailing. Except as provided in 114.2.0, 

214.3.0, 314.3.0, and 414.3.0, a mailer 

may file for a postage refund only if the 

item was not delivered, delivery was not 

attempted, or if the item was not made 

available for claim by the delivery date 

and time specified at the time of 

mailing. 

9.5.3 Refunds Not Given 

[Revise the DMM references in 9.5.3 to 

include 214.3.0 and 314.3.0 as follows:] 

A postage refund will not be given if 

the guaranteed service was not provided 

due to any of the circumstances in 

114.2.0, 214.3.0, 314.3.0, and 414.3.0. 

* * * * * 

700 Special Standards 

703 Nonprofit Standard Mail and 

Other Unique Eligibility 

* * * * * 

2.0 Overseas Military Mail 

* * * * * 

2.6 Express Mail Military Service 

(EMMS) 

* * * * * 

[Revise the title and text of 2.6.10 as 

follows:] 

2.6.10 Signature Required 

A signature is required for Express 

Mail Military Service. 

* * * * * 

We will publish an appropriate 

amendment to 39 CFR part 111 to reflect 

these changes. 

Stanley F. Mires, 

Attorney, Legal Policy & Legislative Advice. 

[FR Doc. 2011–30974 Filed 12–1–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7710–12–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R03–OAR–2011–0469; FRL–9498–7] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; West 

Virginia and Ohio; Determinations of 

Attainment of the 1997 Annual Fine 

Particle Standard for the ParkersburgMarietta and Wheeling Nonattainment 

Areas 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is making determinations 

that the Parkersburg-Marietta, West 

Virginia-Ohio (WV-OH) fine particle 

(PM2.5) nonattainment area and the 

Wheeling, WV-OH PM2.5 nonattainment 


erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 232 / Friday, December 2, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 75465 

area (hereafter referred to as ‘‘Areas’’) 

have attained the 1997 annual PM2.5

National Ambient Air Quality Standard 

(NAAQS) by their applicable attainment 

date of April 5, 2010. These 

determinations are based upon 

complete, quality-assured, and certified 

ambient air monitoring data for the 

2007–2009 monitoring period. EPA is 

finding these Areas to be in attainment, 

in accordance with the requirements of 

the Clean Air Act (CAA). 

DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is 

effective on January 3, 2012. 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket ID 

Number EPA–R03–OAR–2011–0469. All 

documents in the docket are listed in 

the http://www.regulations.gov Web 

site. Although listed in the electronic 

docket, some information is not publicly 

available, i.e., confidential business 

information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, is not placed on 

the Internet and will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available either electronically through 

http://www.regulations.gov or in hard 

copy for public inspection during 

normal business hours at the Air 

Protection Division, U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 

Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 

19103. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Region 3, Irene Shandruk, Office of Air 

Program Planning (3AP30), 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 3, 1650 Arch Street, 

Philadelphia, PA 19103–2029, (215) 

814–2166, shandruk.irene@epa.gov. 

Region 5, Carolyn Persoon, Control 

Strategies Section, Air Programs Branch 

(AR–18J), Environmental Protection 

Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson 

Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, 

(312) 353–8290, 

persoon.carolyn@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

Throughout this document, whenever 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean 

EPA. On July 18, 1997 (62 FR 36852), 

EPA established a health-based PM2.5

NAAQS at 15.0 micrograms per cubic 

meter (mg/m3) based on a 3-year average 

of annual mean PM2.5 concentrations 

(hereafter referred to as ‘‘the annual 

PM2.5 NAAQS’’ or ‘‘the annual 

standard’’). At that time, EPA also 

established a 24-hour standard of 65 mg/ 

m3 (the ‘‘1997 24-hour standard’’). See, 

40 CFR 50.7. On January 5, 2005 (70 FR 

944), EPA published its air quality 

designations and classifications for the 

1997 p.m.2.5 NAAQS based upon air 

quality monitoring data from those 

monitors for calendar years 2001–2003. 

These designations became effective on 

April 5, 2005. The Parkersburg-Marietta, 

WV-OH and Wheeling, WV-OH 

nonattainment areas were designated 

nonattainment for the 1997 p.m.2.5

NAAQS during this designations 

process. See, 40 CFR 81.349 (West 

Virginia) and 40 CFR 81.336 (Ohio). The 

Parkersburg-Marietta, WV-OH 

nonattainment area consists of Wood 

County, WV, the Grant Tax District of 

Pleasants County, WV, and Washington 

County, OH. The Wheeling, WV-OH 

nonattainment area consists of Marshall 

County, WV, Ohio County, WV, and 

Belmont County, OH. 

EPA previously issued determinations 

of attainment of the 1997 annual PM2.5

NAAQS for each of these Areas 

pursuant to 40 CFR 51.1004(c). These 

determinations were published in the 

Federal Register on November 20, 2009 

(74 FR 60199) and remain in effect. 

Under CAA section 179(c), EPA is 

required to make a determination that a 

nonattainment area has attained by its 

applicable attainment date, and publish 

that determination in the Federal 

Register. The determination of 

attainment is not equivalent to a 

redesignation, and the state must still 

meet the statutory requirements for 

redesignation in order for the Areas to 

be redesignated to attainment. 

Complete, quality-assured, and 

certified PM2.5 air quality monitoring 

data recorded in the EPA Air Quality 

System (AQS) database for 2007–2009, 

show that the Parkersburg-Marietta, 

WV-OH and Wheeling, WV-OH 

nonattainment areas attained the 1997 

annual PM2.5 NAAQS by their 

applicable attainment date. 

On July 21, 2011 (76 FR 43634), EPA 

published a notice of proposed 

rulemaking (NPR) for the States of West 

Virginia and Ohio. The NPR proposed to 

determine that the Parkersburg-Marietta, 

WV-OH PM2.5 nonattainment area and 

the Wheeling, WV-OH PM2.5

nonattainment area have attained the 

1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS by the 

applicable attainment date of April 5, 

2010. The proposal is based upon 

complete, quality-assured, and certified 

ambient air monitoring data for the 

2007–2009 monitoring period and EPA’s 

determinations are in accordance with 

EPA’s PM2.5 Implementation Rule of 

April 25, 2007 (72 FR 20664). One 

comment was submitted on the July 21, 

2011 NPR (76 FR 43634). A summary of 

the comment and EPA’s response is 

provided in section III of this document. 

II. What is EPA’s analysis of the 

relevant air quality data? 

EPA has reviewed the ambient air 

monitoring data for PM2.5, consistent 

with the requirements contained in 40 

CFR part 50 and recorded in the data in 

the EPA AQS database for the 

Parkersburg-Marietta, WV-OH and 

Wheeling, WV-OH nonattainment areas 

for the monitoring period from 2007– 

2009. On the basis of that review, EPA 

is determining that the Areas attained 

the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS by the 

applicable April 5, 2010, attainment 

date. 

Under EPA regulations at 40 CFR 

50.7, the annual primary and secondary 

PM2.5 standards are met when the 

annual arithmetic mean concentrations, 

as determined in accordance with 40 

CFR part 50, appendix N, is less than or 

equal to 15.0 mg/m3, at all relevant 

monitoring sites. The values calculated 

in accordance with 40 CFR part 50, 

appendix N, are referred to as design 

values, and these values are used to 

determine if an area is attaining the 

PM2.5 NAAQS. According to the PM2.5

implementation rule, the attainment 

date for these Areas is April 5, 2010, 

and the monitoring data from 2007– 

2009 is used to determine if the Areas 

attained by April 5, 2010. 

Tables 1 shows the PM2.5 design 

values for each monitor in the 

Parkersburg-Marietta, WV-OH 

nonattainment area and the Wheeling, 

WV-OH nonattainment area, 

respectively, for the years 2007–2009. 

All 2007–2009 design values are below 

15.0 mg/m3, and all monitors meet the 

data completeness requirements. 

Therefore, the Parkersburg-Marietta, 

WV-OH and Wheeling, WV-OH 

nonattainment areas attained the 1997 

annual PM2.5 NAAQS by their 

attainment date. 


erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
75466 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 232 / Friday, December 2, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 

TABLE 1—ANNUAL PM2.5 DESIGN VALUES FOR PARKERSBURG-MARIETTA, WV-OH AND WHEELING, WV-OH 

NONATTAINMENT AREAS * 

State County Monitor ID 

Certified annual 

design value 

2007–2009 

(μg/m3) 

Parkersburg-Marietta, WV-OH 

West Virginia .......................................... Wood County ......................................... 541071002 ............................................. 13.7 

Grant Tax District of Pleasants County No monitor ............................................. ............................

Ohio ........................................................ Washington County ................................ No monitor ............................................. ............................

Wheeling, WV-OH 

West Virginia .......................................... Marshall County ..................................... 540511002 ............................................. 13.4 

Ohio County ........................................... 540690010 ............................................. 13.2 

Ohio ........................................................ Belmont County ..................................... No monitor ............................................. ............................

* The data presented in Table 1 are available at http://www.epa.gov/air/airtrends/values.html. 

III. Summary of Public Comment and 

EPA Response 

Comment: A commenter expressed 

concern about implementing a new, 

revised standard for ozone and stated 

that the current 1997 8-hour ozone 

standard should be left in place. 

Response: As stated in the notice of 

proposed rulemaking, this rulemaking 

concerns EPA’s determinations that the 

Parkersburg-Marietta, WV-OH and 

Wheeling, WV-OH nonattainment areas 

have attained the 1997 annual PM2.5

NAAQS. These determinations concern 

only whether these areas meet the 1997 

annual PM2.5 standard, and do not relate 

to any other NAAQS. The commenter 

expressed an opinion as to whether the 

current NAAQS for ozone (the 1997 

Ozone NAAQS) should be revised. 

Because the comment does not relate to 

EPA’s proposed determination that the 

Parkersburg-Marietta, WV-OH and 

Wheeling, WV-OH nonattainment areas 

have attained the 1997 annual PM2.5

NAAQS, it is not relevant to, and is 

beyond the scope of this rulemaking 

action. 

IV. Final Action 

EPA is finalizing the determinations 

that the Parkersburg-Marietta, WV-OH 

and Wheeling, WV-OH nonattainment 

areas have attained the 1997 annual 

PM2.5 standard by the applicable 

attainment date (April 5, 2010). These 

actions meet the requirement pursuant 

to section 179(c) of the CAA for EPA to 

make a determination as to whether the 

Areas attained the standard by the 

applicable attainment date of April 5, 

2010. 

Finalizing these actions does not 

constitute a redesignation of the Areas 

to attainment of the 1997 annual PM2.5

NAAQS under section 107(d)(3) of the 

CAA. Further, finalizing these 

determinations does not involve 

approving maintenance plans for the 

Areas as required under section 175A of 

the CAA, nor does it find that the Areas 

have met all other requirements for 

redesignation. The designation status of 

the Parkersburg-Marietta, WV-OH, and 

Wheeling, WV-OH areas remains 

nonattainment for the 1997 annual 

PM2.5 NAAQS until such time as EPA 

determines that the Areas meet the CAA 

requirements for redesignation to 

attainment and EPA acts to redesignate 

the Parkersburg-Marietta, WV-OH, and 

Wheeling, WV-OH areas. 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

A. General Requirements 

These actions merely make attainment 

determinations based on air quality data 

and does not impose any additional 

requirements. For that reason, this 

action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act 

(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this rule does not have 

Tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the state, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on Tribal governments or preempt 

Tribal law. 

B. Submission to Congress and the 

Comptroller General 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 


erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 232 / Friday, December 2, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 75467 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

C. Petitions for Judicial Review 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by January 31, 2012. Filing a 

petition for reconsideration by the 

Administrator of this final rule does not 

affect the finality of this action for the 

purposes of judicial review nor does it 

extend the time within which a petition 

for judicial review may be filed, and 

shall not postpone the effectiveness of 

such rule or action. This action 

pertaining to the determinations of 

attainment for the Parkersburg-Marietta, 

WV-OH and the Wheeling, WV-OH 

PM2.5 nonattainment areas may not be 

challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Particulate matter, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements. 

Dated: September 27, 2011. 

W.C. Early, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 3. 

Dated: October 18, 2011. 

Susan Hedman, 

Regional Administrator, Region 5. 

40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: 

PART 52—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart KK—Ohio 

■ 2. Section 52.1892 is amended by 

adding paragraph (d) to read as follows: 

§ 52.1892 Determinations of attainment. 

* * * * * 

(d) Based upon EPA’s review of the 

air quality data for the 3-year period 

2007 to 2009, EPA determined that the 

Parkersburg-Marietta, WV-OH and 

Wheeling, WV-OH fine particle (PM2.5) 

nonattainment areas attained the 1997 

annual PM2.5 National Ambient Air 

Quality Standard (NAAQS) by the 

applicable attainment date of April 5, 

2010. Therefore, EPA has met the 

requirement pursuant to CAA section 

179(c) to determine, based on the areas’ 

air quality as of the attainment date, 

whether the areas attained the standard. 

EPA also determined that the 

Parkersburg-Marietta, WV-OH and 

Wheeling, WV-OH PM2.5 nonattainment 

areas are not subject to the 

consequences of failing to attain 

pursuant to section 179(d). 

Subpart XX—West Virginia 

■ 3. Section 52.2527 is amended by 

adding paragraph (d) to read as follows: 

§ 52.2527 Determinations of attainment. 

* * * * * 

(d) Based upon EPA’s review of the 

air quality data for the 3-year period 

2007 to 2009, EPA determined that the 

Parkersburg-Marietta, WV-OH and 

Wheeling, WV-OH fine particle (PM2.5) 

nonattainment areas attained the 1997 

annual PM2.5 National Ambient Air 

Quality Standard (NAAQS) by the 

applicable attainment date of April 5, 

2010. Therefore, EPA has met the 

requirement pursuant to CAA section 

179(c) to determine, based on the areas’ 

air quality as of the attainment date, 

whether the areas attained the standard. 

EPA also determined that the 

Parkersburg-Marietta, WV-OH and 

Wheeling, WV-OH PM2.5 nonattainment 

areas are not subject to the 

consequences of failing to attain 

pursuant to section 179(d). 

[FR Doc. 2011–30923 Filed 12–1–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R06–OAR–2010–0775; FRL–9496–8] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; 

Louisiana; Revisions To Control 

Volatile Organic Compound Emissions 

for Surface Coatings and Graphic Arts 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is approving State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions for 

control of volatile organic compounds 

(VOCs) adopted by Louisiana on June 

20, 2009 and August 20, 2010, and 

submitted to EPA on August 31, 2010. 

EPA is also approving, by parallel 

processing, a SIP revision for control of 

emission of organic compounds which 

was proposed by Louisiana on January 

10, 2011 and adopted on April 20, 2011. 

EPA issued Control Techniques 

Guidelines (CTGs) in 2006, 2007 and 

2008; Louisiana’s rule revisions being 

approved in this action were developed 

in response to these CTGs. EPA is 

approving these revisions because they 

meet the requirements of Reasonably 

Available Control Technology (RACT) 

as set forth in the Clean Air Act (CAA) 

as well as the requirements of EPA’s 

regulations, and they are consistent with 

EPA’s guidance. This action is being 

taken under section 110 and part D of 

the CAA. 

DATES: This final rule is effective on 

January 3, 2012. 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket 

Identification No. EPA–R06–OAR– 

2010–0775. All documents in the docket 

are listed at http://www.regulations.gov. 

Although listed in the index, some 

information is not publicly available, 

e.g., Confidential Business Information 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Certain other 

material, such as copyrighted material, 

is not placed on the Internet and will be 

publicly available only in hard copy 

form. Publicly available docket 

materials are available either 

electronically through 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Air Planning Section (6PD–L), 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 

Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 

75202–2733. The file will be made 

available by appointment for public 

inspection in the Region 6 Freedom of 

Information Act (FOIA) Review Room 

between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 

p.m. weekdays except for legal holidays. 

Contact the person listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT

paragraph below or Mr. Bill Deese at 

(214) 665–7253 to make an 

appointment. If possible, please make 

the appointment at least two working 

days in advance of your visit. There will 

be a 15 cent per page fee for making 

photocopies of documents. On the day 

of the visit, please check in at the EPA 

Region 6 reception area at 1445 Ross 

Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Ellen Belk, Air Planning Section (6PD– 

L), Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700, 

Dallas, Texas 75202–2733, telephone 

(214) 665–2164; fax number (214) 665– 

7263; email address belk.ellen@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document wherever 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean 

the EPA. 

Outline 

I. What is the background for these actions? 

II. What comments did we receive on the 

proposed rule? 

III. What actions are we taking? 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 


erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES