alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

        Pursuant to the governing documents including but not limited to various
Pooling and Servicing  Agreements,  Servicing Agreements and Sales and Servicing
Agreement,  (the  "Agreements"),  where  Residential  Funding  Corporation  (the
"Master  Servicer") has been appointed Master  Servicer,  an annual statement of
compliance  is required to be delivered  to either the Trustee or the  Investor.
The undersigned hereby certify that:

        (i)    a review of the  activities  of the  Master  Servicer  during the
               preceding  calendar year has been conducted,  and the performance
               of duties  outlined  in the  Agreements  has been made  under the
               undersigned officers' supervision;

        (ii)   to the best of the undersigned officers' knowledge,  based on the
               aforementioned  review, the Master Servicer has complied with the
               minimum  servicing  standards  set forth in the USAP for Mortgage
               Bankers,  and  has  fulfilled  off  of its  material  obligations
               relating to the  Agreements in all material  respects  throughout
               such year; and

        (iii)  to  the  best  of  the  undersigned  officers'  knowledge,   each
               Subservicer has complied with the minimum servicing standards set
               forth in the USAP for Mortgage Bankers,  and has fulfilled all of
               its  material  obligations  relating  to  the  Agreements  in all
               material respects throughout such year.


Date: March 30, 2004



/s/Barbara Wendt
_____________________
Barbara Wendt
Managing Director, Master Servicing


/s/Darsi Meyer
_____________________
Darsi Meyer
Director, Securities Administration
#### § 3186.225 Whom in the IMLS does a recipient other than an individual notify about a criminal drug conviction?

A recipient other than an individual that is required under 2 CFR 182.225(a) to notify Federal agencies about an employee's conviction for a criminal drug offense must notify each IMLS office from which it currently has an award.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [License No. 06/06-0335]

Notice is hereby given that Escalate Capital Partners, SBIC I, L.P., 300 W. 6th Street, Suite 2250, Austin, TX 78701, a Federal Licensee under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (“the Act”), in connection with the financing of a small concern, has sought an exemption under Section 312 of the Act and Section 107.730, Financings which Constitute Conflicts of Interest of the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.730). Escalate Capital Partners, SBIC I, L.P. proposes to provide debt security financing to LDR Holding Corporation, 4030 West Braker Lane, Suite 360, Austin, TX 78759. The financing is contemplated to provide capital for operations and expansion.

                    The financing is brought within the purview of § 107.730(a)(1) of the Regulations because AV-EC Partners I, L.P., an Associate of Escalate Capital                           ( print page 620)                        Partners, SBIC I, L.P., owns more than ten percent of LDR Holding Corporation. Therefore, this transaction is considered a financing of an Associate requiring an exemption.                

Notice is hereby given that any interested person may submit written comments on the transaction within fifteen days of the date of this publication to the Associate Administrator for Investment, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416.

Dated: December 29, 2010.

Sean Greene,

Associate Administrator for Investment.

[FR Doc. 2010-33276 Filed 1-4-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 6136

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. KELVIN JEROME NEWKIRK , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Wilmington

. Malcolm J. Howard , Senior District Judge. ( 7:15

- cr - 00019

- H

- 1; 7:16

- cv 00345

- H )

Submitted : April 25, 2019 Decided: April 30, 2019

Before FLOYD and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Kelvin Jerome Newkirk, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Kelv in Jerome Newkirk seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A

c ertificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating tha t reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies r elief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently r eviewed the record and conclude that Newkirk has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented i n the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
(October 9, 1980)

#### Commercial Bank of Korea, Ltd., New York Agency, Respondent, v S & Y International Corporation, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on March 20, 1980, unanimously dismissed as academic, without costs and without disbursements. The order of said court entered on or about May 20, 1980 is unanimously affirmed. Respondent shall recover of appellant $50 costs and disbursements of this appeal. No opinion. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Birns, Lupiano and Yesawich, JJ.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Balance
Sheet, Statement of Operations, Statements of Cash Flows and Notes thereto
incorporated in Part 1, Item I of this Form 10-Q and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1991
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1992
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1557
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,557
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              170
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,400
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,557
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Unassociated Document


    Exhibit
      10.154

    


    STATE
      OF
      CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES

    


    Certificate
      Of

    RADIATION
      MACHINE REGISTRATION

    


    


    


    HIENERGY
      TECHNOLOGIES

    


    


    


    Has
      registered in accordance with the requirements of 

    Title
      17,
      Californai Code of Regulations, Section 30108

    as
      possessing reportable sources of radiation at

    


    


    1601
      ALTON PKWY, UNIT B

    IRVINE
      CA
      92606

    


     

    
      	 	 	 
	 	 
	 
 	 
 	 
 
	REGISTRATION
              NUMBER: FAC61566	  	/s/ Edgar
              D.
              Bailey
	REGISTRATION
              EXPIRES: MARCH 31, 2008 	
              
Edgar
              D. Bailey
	 	Chief
	 	Radiologic Health Branch
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          390087
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   217192
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                609006
<PP&E>                                        19039521
<DEPRECIATION>                                 4626413
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                24118288
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           524745
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    19438854
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  24118288
<SALES>                                           5666
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                682276
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    89837
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                194044
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               38042
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 360353
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             360353
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    360353
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     6.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     6.08
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.2


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-07549) pertaining to the BT Office Products International, Inc. 1995
Stock Option Plan and the Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement between BT Office
Products International,  Inc. and Herman C. Brauckmann of our report dated April
5, 1996, with respect to the consolidated  financial  statements and schedule of
BT Office  Products  International,  Inc.  included in the Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996.



                                                  Ernst & Young LLP




Chicago, Illinois
March 21, 1997



<PAGE>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 660 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 660

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      February 8, 2006.
Whereas youth mentoring is a centuries-old concept, through which a dependable 
        adult provides guidance, support, and encouragement to help a young 
        person become a responsible, productive adult;
Whereas mentoring, when done well, helps young people stay in school and improve 
        academically, boosts self-esteem and communication skills, and improves 
        the chances of going on to higher education;
Whereas there are thousands of mentoring programs in communities of all sizes 
        across the United States, focused on building strong, effective 
        relationships between caring and responsible adults and young people who 
        need positive adult role models;
Whereas in spite of the great benefits mentoring provides, America has a serious 
        mentoring gap, with more than 15 million young people currently in need 
        of caring adult role models;
Whereas the demand for mentoring far exceeds the current capacity of local 
        mentoring programs and the number of adults who currently volunteer as 
        mentors;
Whereas on December 22, 2005, the President designated January 2006 as National 
        Mentoring Month to focus the Nation's attention on the essential role 
        mentoring plays in the lives of young people;
Whereas the month-long celebration of mentoring will encourage more individuals 
        and organizations, including schools, businesses, nonprofit 
        organizations, faith institutions, and foundations, to become engaged in 
        mentoring; and
Whereas National Mentoring Month will, most importantly, build awareness of 
        mentoring and recruit more individuals to become mentors, helping close 
        our Nation's mentoring gap: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of National Mentoring Month;
            (2) acknowledges the hard work of individuals and groups who promote 
        mentoring and who are observing the month with appropriate ceremonies 
        and activities that promote awareness of and volunteer involvement with 
        youth mentoring; and
            (3) recognizes with gratitude the contributions of the millions of 
        caring adults who are already serving as mentors and encourages more 
        adults to volunteer as mentors.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
§ 1.392 Who receives a copy of the detention order? ( a ) FDA must issue the detention order to the owner, operator, or agent in charge of the place where the article of food is located. If the owner of the article of food is different from the owner, operator, or agent in charge of the place where the article is detained, FDA must provide a copy of the detention order to the owner of the article of food if the owner's identity can be determined readily.
( b ) If FDA issues a detention order for an article of food located in a vehicle or other carrier used to transport the detained article of food, FDA also must provide a copy of the detention order to the shipper of record and the owner and operator of the vehicle or other carrier, if their identities can be determined readily.
#### § 5800.970 Nonprocurement transaction.

While the Commission treats all payments made to states under 42 U.S.C. 15301, 15302 and 15401 as grants, this part does not apply to grants made to states and political subdivisions therein.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. JOSE M. CRUZ-GONZALEZ, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 500 MAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 26th day of November, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
p.1 

OAR Box 1384 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

160) ll-E-120 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:08 AM Sheet 160 of 264 
P.2 

FROM : RTR IND PHONE NO. 

uj.yi»a4iL»2J4 

4236386895 

FES RTP NC 

Jan. 20 2092 li:20H1 P2 

12)002/002 

A 945 2 

From: 

Date: 

Contact: 

Contact Report 

Robert Jemison, Pacific Environmental Services, Inc^PE 

Jfmuary9,1998 

Mr. Michael C. Carlton 

Company: American Technology & Research Industries, Inc. 

Telephone Number: (423)638-5847 

Fax Number: (423)638-6895 

Contact Summary: 

Mr. Michael C. Carlton was contacted to update information provided in the 1993 EPA 

Reinforced Plastic/Composites Screening Survey submitted by American Technology & Research 

Industries, Inc. for their facility located in Ocala, Florida. In response to my questions Mr. Carlton 

indicated the following: 

The company and its facility located in Ocala, Florida have moved to Greenville. Tennessee. 

Tlw fecility still uses flow coaters and pressure-fed rollers to apply a polyester resin in the 

"fabrication of certain products. FOT products fabricated using cither flow coaters and/or pressure-fed 

rollers, flow coaters are used for approximately 75% ofthe production and pressure-fed rollers are 

used for the remaining 25%. The polyester resin applied by these devices contains approximately 

40% styrene by weight and doss not contain a vapor suppressant. No additional styrene is added to 

the resin during this fabrication process. 

The facility still uses the resin transfer molding (RTM) process in the fabrication of certain 

products. The polyester resin used wilh this process contains approximately 40% styrene by weight 

and does not contain a vapor suppressant. No additional styrene is added to the resin during the 

fabrication process. 

The facility still uses atomized mechanical spray-up to apply a polyester gel coat which 

contains approximately 40% styrene by weight. No additional styrene or methyl methacrylate is 

added to this gel coat in the fabrication process. 

The facility still uses the vacuum bagging process (with prepreg materials) in the fabrication 

of certain products. 

INFOR.MATION IS ACCURATE
EXHIBIT 23.1
   Consent of Ernst & Young LLP

   We consent  to the  incorporation by  reference in  the  Registration
   Statements of Spyglass, Inc. on Form  S-3 (File Nos. 333-06943,  333-
   08255, 333-08253 and 333-14643) and on Form S-8 (File Nos.  33-95164,
   33-95160, 33-95162, 33-95158, 333-2312,  333-04357 and 333-40831)  of
   Spyglass, Inc. of our reports dated October 19, 1998, with respect to
   the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Spyglass,  Inc.
   included and incorporated by reference in the Annual Report (Form 10-
   K) for the year ended September 30, 1998.

   /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

   Ernst & Young LLP
   Chicago, Illinois
   December 18, 1998
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, DC
WALKERAG SUPPLY, LLC, et al Complainant, 

### v. WAHOO AIRPORT AUTHORITY, WAHOO MUNICIPAL AIRPORT Respondent. FAA Docket 

### No. 16-14-08

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME
This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based onthe abovereferenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practicefor Federally-Assisted AirportEnforcementProceedings, 14 CFRPart 16. Pursuant to 14 CFRPart 16, subpart B, the date by which the Director's Determination will be issued inthis matter is hereby extended to November 23, 2016. An extension oftime is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination in this case due to the complexity ofthe Record.

Dir tor, Airport Compliance and Management Analysis

# ~M Z}) 

# 2-Dlb DateCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFYthat on September 22,2016, I causedto be placed in the United States mail (first class mail, postage paid) a true copy ofthe foregoing document addressed to: Agent for Complainants: Mr. William Foster BetterAirports, LLC 4504 North Versailles Avenue Dallas, Texas 75205
Counsel for Respondent: Mr. Larry S. Kaplan Mr. Keith Yamaguchi Kaplan, Massamillo & Andrews, LLC 200 West Madison Street 161 h Floor Chicago, Illinois 60606 Copies to: FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket FAAAirport Compliance and Management Analysis, AC0-100 FAA Central Region, ACE-600
§ 111.77 What must you do if established specifications are not met? ( a ) For specifications established under § 111.70(a), (b)(2), (b)(3), (c), (d), (e), and (g) that you do not meet, quality control personnel, in accordance with the requirements in subpart F of this part, must reject the component, dietary supplement, package or label unless such personnel approve a treatment, an in-process adjustment, or reprocessing that will ensure the quality of the finished dietary supplement and that the dietary supplement is packaged and labeled as specified in the master manufacturing record. No finished batch of dietary supplements may be released for distribution unless it complies with § 111.123(b).
( b ) For specifications established under § 111.70(b)(1) that you do not meet, quality control personnel must reject the component and the component must not be used in manufacturing the dietary supplement.
( c ) For specifications established under § 111.70(f) that you do not meet, quality control personnel must reject the product and the product may not be packaged or labeled for distribution as a dietary supplement.