alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                           5
<CIK>                                               0000812818
<NAME>                                 Hutton Investors Futures Fund, L.P. II

<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                      JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                        JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                                      22,305,956
<SECURITIES>                                                 1,890,804
<RECEIVABLES>                                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            24,196,760
<PP&E>                                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              24,196,760
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          789,242
<BONDS>                                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                0
<PREFERRED>                                                          0
<COMMON>                                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                                  23,407,518
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                24,196,760
<SALES>                                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             1,432,257
<CGS>                                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               247,297
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              1,184,960
<INCOME-TAX>                                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                      0
<CHANGES>                                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 1,184,960
<EPS-BASIC>                                                   329.86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                        0


</TABLE>
### Sediment-hosted gold deposits of the world: Database and grade and tonnage models

By: Vladimir I. BergerDan L. MosierJames D. BlissBarry C. Moring**

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20141074

#### Links

- More information:  **USGS Index Page**
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report** 
- Appendix:  **Appendix**
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
2001.603 Selection, appointment, and

termination of appointment.

The Director, Division of Contracts and Property Management, is authorized by the Director, Office

of Administration, to select and appoint contracting officers and to terminate their appointment as

prescribed in FAR 1.603. Delegations of contracting officer authority are issued by memorandum

which includes a clear statement of the delegated authority, including responsibilities and

limitations in addition to the “Certificate of Appointment”, SF 1402. The Director, Division of

Contracts and Property Management, may delegate micro-purchase authority in accordance with

agency procedures. This delegation may be accomplished by written memorandum. (ref. FAR

1.603-3(b))

Parent topic: Subpart 2001.6 - Contracting Authority and Responsibilities
§ 1132.1 Purpose of this part. ( a ) This part specifies standard wording of general terms and conditions concerning recipients' purchases of property (supplies, equipment, and real property) and services.
( b ) It thereby implements OMB guidance in 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.326, and appendix II to 2 CFR part 200, as those portions of 2 CFR part 200 apply to general terms and conditions of grants and cooperative agreements. It also partially implements 2 CFR 200.205(d), 200.213, and 200.517.
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 538 Reported in House (RH)]







                                                 House Calendar No. 112
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 538

                          [Report No. 109-277]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
bill (H.R. 2862) making appropriations for Science, the Departments of 
State, Justice, and Commerce, and related agencies for the fiscal year 
           ending September 30, 2006, and for other purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 8, 2005

   Mr. Gingrey, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
bill (H.R. 2862) making appropriations for Science, the Departments of 
State, Justice, and Commerce, and related agencies for the fiscal year 
           ending September 30, 2006, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 
2862) making appropriations for Science, the Departments of State, 
Justice, and Commerce, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending 
September 30, 2006, and for other purposes. All points of order against 
the conference report and against its consideration are waived. The 
conference report shall be considered as read.
                                                 House Calendar No. 112

109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 538

                          [Report No. 109-277]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
bill (H.R. 2862) making appropriations for Science, the Departments of 
State, Justice, and Commerce, and related agencies for the fiscal year 
           ending September 30, 2006, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            November 8, 2005

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
**Exhibit 23****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements on Form S-8, (No. 33-38737,No. 33-73044, No. 33-58037, No. 333-33433, andNo. 333-34549) and in the Registration Statement onForm S-4 (No. 33-65229) of Bell Industries, Inc. ofour report dated February 25, 2005 relating to thefinancial statements and financial statement schedule, whichappears in this Form 10-K./s/ PricewaterhouseCoopersLLPLos Angeles, CaliforniaMarch 31, 2005
# C o urt o f A ppe a ls

o f th e S ta te o f G e o rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A25A026 6

. S T E VE N F E T T E ROLF v. T HE S T AT E.

I n M arc h 2022, Stev en Fettero lf p led gu ilty to aggrav a ted ass a u l t a nd o ther

c rimes, and he rec eiv ed a p ro bated sentenc e. In M arc h 2024, the trial c o u rt rev o k ed

Fettero lf ’ s p ro batio n u p o n f ind ing that he had ad mitted to v io lating his co nd itio ns o f

p ro batio n. Fettero lf

f iled this d irec t ap p eal, bu t w e lac k j u risd ic tio n.

A n ap p eal f

ro m a p ro b a tio n rev o c a tio n o rd e r mu st b e mad e by ap plic atio n f o r

d isc r etio nary ap p e al. See OCGA § 5- 6

- 35 ( a) ( 5). “ Co mp lianc e with the d isc retio nary

ap p eals p ro c e d u re is j u risd ic tio nal. ” S mo a k v

. D ept. o f Hu ma n Res o u rces

, 221 Ga. A p p

.

257

, 257 (47 1 SE2d 6 0) (1 9 9 6 ). Fettero lf ’ s f ailu re to f o l l o w the requ ired p r o c ed u re

d ep riv es u s o f j u risd ic t io n o v e r this d irec t ap p eal, w hic h is hereby D I SM I SSED

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a ls o f t h e S t a t e o f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O ffic e

, A t la n t a

,

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

I c e r t ify t h a t t h e a b o v e is a t

r u e e x t r a c t fr o m

t h e m in u t e s o f t h e C o u r t o f A pp e a ls o f G e o r g ia

.

W i t n e s s m y s ig n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o f s a id c o u r t

h e r e t o a ffix e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r la s t a b o v e w r

it t e n

.

, C le r

k

. September 04, 2024

09/04/2024
§ 1305.15 Unaccepted and defective DEA Forms 222. ( a ) A DEA Form 222 must not be filled if either of the following apply: ( 1 ) The order is not complete, legible, or properly prepared, executed, or endorsed.
( 2 ) The order shows any alteration, erasure, or change of any description.
( b ) If a DEA Form 222 cannot be filled for any reason under this section, the supplier must return the original DEA Form 222 to the purchaser with a statement as to the reason (*e.g.,* illegible or altered).
( c ) A supplier may for any reason refuse to accept any order and if a supplier refuses to accept the order, a statement that the order is not accepted is sufficient for purposes of this paragraph.
( d ) When a purchaser receives an unaccepted order, the original DEA Form 222 and the statement must be retained in the files of the purchaser in accordance with § 1305.17. A defective DEA Form 222 may not be corrected; it must be replaced by a new DEA Form 222 for the order to be filled.
[70 FR 16911, Apr. 1, 2005, as amended at 84 FR 51375, Sept. 30, 2019]
#### Victoriano V. RAGADOS, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent.

No. 05-3351.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Oct. 28, 2005.

Victoriano V. Ragados, Kenneth S. Kes-sler, pro se.

ORDER

Order Vacated, See 2005 WL 3456857:

The petitioner having failed to pay the docketing fee required by Federal Circuit Rule 52(a)(1) and to file the required Statement Concerning Discrimination, it is

ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
Exhibit 32

 

Certification

 

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Inland's Monthly Income Fund, L.P. (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;

(2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(3) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inland's Monthly Income Fund, L.P.

 

 

By: Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation

       General Partner

 

/S/ Brenda G. Gujral_________________________________

Name: Brenda G. GujralTitle: President of the General Partner and        Principal Executive Officer of Inland's Monthly Income Fund, L.P

Date: August 11, 2003
#### Patrick JENNINGS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Anthony DEPERIO, M.D., R. Punzal, M.D., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 04-5696.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Nov. 3, 2005.

*91Patrick Jennings, New York, NY, for Appellant, pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General of the State of New York, Martin A. Hotvet, Assistant Solicitor General, Albany, NY, for Appellees.

Present: WINTER, POOLER, and SOTOMAYOR, Circuit Judges.

SUMMARY ORDER

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of said District Court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.

Patrick Jennings appeals from a judgment of the district court dismissing, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, his Eighth Amendment deliberate medical indifference claims. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts, the procedural history, and the specification of appellate issues, and hold as follows.

The district court properly dismissed the majority of Jennings’s deliberate indifference claims because he did not exhaust available administrative remedies. *See Porter v. Nussle,*534 U.S. 516, 520, 122 S.Ct. 983, 152 L.Ed.2d 12 (2002). With respect to the remaining claim, deliberate indifference to Jennings’s glaucoma, the court properly granted summary judgment because the defendants submitted unrefut-ed evidence that they attended to this condition to the best of their abilities and referred Jennings for outside medical assistance, which he declined to accept. Therefore, a reasonable jury could not have found that defendants were deliberately indifferent to Jennings’s serious medical needs. *See Hathaway v. Coughlin,*99 F.3d 550 (2d Cir.1996).

We have considered Jennings’s remaining arguments and found that they wholly lack merit. We therefore affirm.
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear at 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

#### § 117.274 Presiding officer for an appeal and for an informal hearing.

The presiding officer for an appeal, and for an informal hearing, must be an Office of Regulatory Affairs Program Director or another FDA official senior to an FDA Division Director.

[85 FR 16553, Mar. 24, 2020]
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
     We hereby consent to the use in the Prospectus consisting part of this
Registration Statement on Form S-4 of Northland Cable Television, Inc. of our
reports dated October 10, 1997 relating to the financial statements of Aiken II
Cable Systems, a component of Robin Cable Systems, L.P., and the financial
statements of Greenwood Cable Systems, a component of InterMedia Partners of
Carolina, L.P. which appear in such Prospectus. We also consent to the
references to us under the heading "Experts," "Summary Historical and Pro Forma
Consolidated Financial Data" and "Selected Historical and Pro Forma Consolidated
Financial Data" in such Prospectus. However, it should be noted that Price
Waterhouse LLP has not prepared or certified such "Summary Historical and Pro
Forma Consolidated Financial Data" or "Selected Historical and Pro Forma
Consolidated Financial Data."
 
PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
 
San Francisco, California
February 4, 1998
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 86 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Education and 

the Workforce in the One Hundred Fifteenth Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 3, 2017 

Ms. FOXX (for herself and Mr. SCOTT of Virginia) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on 

Education and the Workforce in the One Hundred Fifteenth Congress. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Education and 

4 the Workforce (hereafter in this resolution referred to as 

5 the ‘‘Committee’’), including the expenses of all staff sala6 ries, there shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts 

7 of the House of Representatives for committee salaries 

8 and expenses, not more than $14,454,212 for the One 

9 Hundred Fifteenth Congress. 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS

2 

•HRES 86 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 

2 Of the amount specified in section 1— 

3 (1) not more than $7,146,429 shall be available 

4 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

5 noon on January 3, 2017, and ending immediately 

6 before noon on January 3, 2018; and 

7 (2) not more than $7,307,783 shall be available 

8 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

9 noon on January 3, 2018, and ending immediately 

10 before noon on January 3, 2019. 

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on 

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration. 

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall 

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 

19 the Committee on House Administration. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2012-0930

Directorate Identifier: 2011NM251AD

100-29-14 --- 12/16/10

SBIS 100-29-14 --- 12/22/10

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
# EUR-Lex - 31994D0275 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31994D0275

**94/275/EC: Commission Decision of 18 April 1994 on recognizing rabies vaccines **

*
Official Journal L 117 , 07/05/1994 P. 0041 - 0041 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 57 P. 0080 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 57 P. 0080 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 18 April 1994 on recognizing rabies vaccines (94/275/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 92/65/EEC of 13 July 1992 on laying down animal health requirements governing trade in and imports into the Community of animals, semen, ova and embryos not subject to animal health requirements laid down in specific Community rules referred to in Annex 4 (I) to Directive 90/425/EEC (1), and in particular Article 10 (2) (a), third indent, and (3) (b) (i) thereof,

Whereas it is necessary to recognize the anti-rabies vaccines that are permitted to be used on dogs and cats that are traded between the Member States, to be used on dogs and cats more than three months of age intended to be traded between Member States, and in the case of dogs and cats intended to be put on the market in Ireland and the United Kingdom and not originating in those two countries;

Whereas, in conformity with Article 10 (2) (a), third indent, and (3) (b) (i), vaccines must be inactivated vaccines of at least one international antigenic unit (WHO standard) measured in accordance with the activity test by the method described by the European Pharmacopoeia;

Whereas for vaccines to be recognized at Community level it is additionally necessary to lay down rules for the manufacture of the vaccines; in this regard it is convenient to refer to the protocols described in the relevant monograph of the European Pharmacopoeia;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The vaccines recognized at Community level are those manufactured according to the protocols laid down in the monograph of the European Pharmacopoeia on vaccinum rabiei inactivatum ad usum veterinarium (rabies vaccine (inactivated) for veterinary use).

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 April 1994.

For the Commission

René STEICHEN

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 268, 14. 9. 1992, p. 54.
§ 121.140 Food defense monitoring. As appropriate to the nature of the mitigation strategy and its role in the facility's food defense system: ( a ) *Written procedures.* You must establish and implement written procedures, including the frequency with which they are to be performed, for food defense monitoring of the mitigation strategies.
( b ) *Food defense monitoring.* You must monitor the mitigation strategies with adequate frequency to provide assurances that they are consistently performed.
( c ) *Records* — ( 1 ) *Requirement to document food defense monitoring.* You must document the monitoring of mitigation strategies in accordance with this section in records that are subject to verification in accordance with § 121.150(a)(1) and records review in accordance with § 121.150(a)(3)(i).
( 2 ) *Exception records.* Records may be affirmative records demonstrating the mitigation strategy is functioning as intended. Exception records demonstrating the mitigation strategy is not functioning as intended may be adequate in some circumstances.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,100
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           116
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,216)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>