alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     9
<LEGEND>
    This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
    statement of condition dated 12/31/96 and statement of income for the twelve
    months ended 12/31/96 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
    such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0000945434
<NAME>                          BNCCORP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                    1000
<CURRENCY>                      U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                 1
<CASH>                          6,360
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>          865
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                6,900
<TRADING-ASSETS>                0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>     59,491
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>          0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>            0
<LOANS>                         202,997
<ALLOWANCE>                     1,594
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  288,558
<DEPOSITS>                      239,770
<SHORT-TERM>                    11,437
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>             4,101
<LONG-TERM>                     10,615
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        23
<OTHER-SE>                      22,612
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>  288,558
<INTEREST-LOAN>                 16,383
<INTEREST-INVEST>               4,574
<INTEREST-OTHER>                0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                20,957
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>              9,738
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              11,107
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>           9,850
<LOAN-LOSSES>                   739
<SECURITIES-GAINS>              19
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                 8,213
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 2,994
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>      1,847
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    1,847
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   .79
<EPS-DILUTED>                   .79
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                  8.70
<LOANS-NON>                     22
<LOANS-PAST>                    129
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                136
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                 2,844
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                1,048
<CHARGE-OFFS>                   350
<RECOVERIES>                    157
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>               1,594
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>            1,594
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>             0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>         174
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1


               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


 In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Health Group Corp. (the
 "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with
 the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
 I, Edward L. Wristen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby
 certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
 Company.


 /s/ Edward L. Wristen
 -----------------------
 Edward L. Wristen
 Chief Executive Officer
 August 13, 2002
§ 182.1127 Aluminum ammonium sulfate. ( a ) *Product.* Aluminum ammonium sulfate.
( b ) *Conditions of use.* This substance is generally recognized as safe when used in accordance with good manufacturing practice.
"Berry, Leslie" 

<Leslie_Berry@americanchem

istry.com>

12/29/2010 12:09 PM

To EHPV-Program-Submissions@EPA

cc "Franz, Christina" 

<Christina_Franz@americanchemistry.com>

bcc

Subject n-Pentyl Propionate EHPV Submission

· Type of EHPV Program Sponsorship: Standard EHPV program commitment 

· Sponsor Name: ACC’s Oxo Process Panel

· Submission Title: n-Pentyl Propionate EHPV Submission

· CAS Numbers: 624-54-4

Please contact me with any questions.

Regards

Leslie

Leslie Berry

Chemical Products & Technology Division

American Chemistry Council

700 2nd Street, NE, Washington, DC 20002

Ph: (202) 249.6716

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ This message may contain confidential information and 

is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee do not disseminate, 

distribute or copy this email. Please notify the sender immediately by email if you have received 

this email by mistake and delete this email from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be 

guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, 

destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept 

liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as a result of 

email transmission. American Chemistry Council, 700 – 2nd Street NE, Washington, DC 20002, 
www.americanchemistry.com - n-Pentyl_Propionate_TestPlan_22Dec_2010.doc - 

Pentyl_Propionate_Dossier_Dec_20_2010.doc
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                          18,682
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,517
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                49,771
<PP&E>                                          26,307
<DEPRECIATION>                                (11,332)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  68,714
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          533,461
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        23,138
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    68,714
<SALES>                                         46,444
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                46,444
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  234,091
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (187,647)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (187,647)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (187,647)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)
        

</TABLE>
### Water supply for the Nuclear Rocket Development Station at the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission's Nevada Test Site

By: Richard Arden Young

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1938

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

___________________________

No. 97-30402

___________________________
In the Matter of: JAN BYRD HOLLAND,
Debtor,

JAN BYRD HOLLAND, Appellant,

VERSUS

LOUISIANA SECRETARY OF REVENUE AND TAXATION; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Appellees.

___________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court For the Western District of Louisiana

(96-CV-2689)

___________________________________________________ October 23, 1997 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *
The appellant argued to both the bankruptcy court and the
district court that the Internal Revenue Code does not impose liability on him as an individual. He also argued that the
constitution prohibits imposition of such liability. The appellant made a number of legal arguments in support of these contentions,2

each of which the district court carefully addressed and rejected.

For reasons stated in its Memorandum Ruling and Judgment, issued on February 7, 1997, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.
Affirmed.
§ 146.150 Canned concentrated orange juice. ( a ) Canned concentrated orange juice is the food that complies with the requirements of composition, definition of dilution ratio, and labeling of ingredients prescribed for frozen concentrated orange juice by § 146.146, except that it is not frozen and it is sealed in containers and so processed by heat, either before or after sealing, so as to prevent spoilage.
( b ) The name of the food when concentrated to a dilution ratio of 3 plus 1 is “Canned concentrated orange juice” or “Canned orange juice concentrate”. The name of the food when concentrated to a dilution ratio greater than 3 plus 1 is “Canned concentrated orange juice, ______ plus 1” or “Canned orange juice concentrate, ______ plus 1”, the blank being filled in with the whole number showing the dilution ratio; for example, “Canned orange juice concentrate, 4 plus 1”. However, where the label bears directions for making 1 quart of single-strength diluted product (or multiples of a quart) the blank in the name may be filled in with a mixed number; for example, “Canned orange juice concentrate, 41 ⁄ 3 plus 1”. For containers larger than 1 pint, the dilution ratio in the name may be replaced by the concentration of orange juice soluble solids in degrees Brix; for example, a 62° Brix concentrate in 1-gallon cans may be named on the label “canned concentrated orange juice, 62° Brix”. If the food does not purport to be frozen concentrated orange juice, the word “canned” may be omitted from the name.
[42 FR 14433, Mar. 15, 1977, as amended at 58 FR 2881, Jan. 6, 1993]
#### § 1312.14 Distribution of import permits.

The Administration shall transmit the import permit to the competent national authority of the exporting country and shall make an official record of the import permit available to the importer through secure electronic means. The importer, or their agent, must submit an official record of the import permit and/or required data concerning the import transaction to a customs officer at the port of entry in compliance with all import control requirements of agencies with import control authorities under the Act or statutory authority other than the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act. The importer must maintain an official record of the import permit (available from the DEA Diversion Control Division secure network application after issuance) in accordance with part 1304 of this chapter as the record of authority for the importation and shall transmit an official record of the permit to the foreign exporter. If required by the foreign competent national authority, the importer shall ensure that an official record of the import permit is provided (*e.g.,* by transmitting an official record of the permit to the foreign exporter who shall transmit such record to the competent national authority of the exporting county). The importer must ensure that an official record of the permit accompanies the shipment of controlled substances to its final destination, the registered location of the importer (*i.e.,* drop shipments are prohibited).

[81 FR 97027, Dec. 30, 2016]
38344.

#### WASHINGTON v. THE STATE.

Carlisle, Judge.

1. Where the accusation charged the defendant with cheating and swindling in that he did make and draw a certain check dated November 7, 1958, and where upon the trial of the case the State offered in evidence a check bearing the date “Nov. 7, 198,” which was in all other respects the same as that described in the accusation and which was admitted in evidence without objection by the defendant, such check thus offered in evidence appeared on its face to be ambiguous as to the date thereof. Since *70it bore the defendant’s signature thereon and could not possibly have been executed by the defendant in the year 198, it was subject to parol explanation as to the meaning thereof, and where the witness for the State testified that the defendant did make and utter a check like that described in the accusation bearing the date of November 7, 1958, which testimony was admitted without objection, such testimony sufficiently explained the date appearing on the check introduced in evidence, and there was at most a mere conflict in the evidence which the jury was authorized to resolve in favor of the State. Under these circumstances, this court cannot say that there was such a fatal variance between the allegations and the proof as would require a ruling that the evidence did not authorize the verdict of guilty, especially where the defendant, in his statement, did not deny executing the check in question but merely stated that he executed it in payment of a bill for repairs to his automobile which had been made by the prosecuting witness intending the said check to operate as an “I.O.U.” until he could pay the prosecutor. The evidence authorized the verdict of guilty. Cases holding that instruments materially varying in their details from the averments of the indictment or accusation were improperly admitted in evidence over a timely objection of the defendant, cited by the plaintiff in error in support of his contentions in this regard, do not require a ruling different from that now made.

Decided June 22, 1960

Rehearing denied July 7,1960.

2. The trial court did not err in charging the jury with respect to the defendant’s statement that they should give it such weight and credit as they thought it deserved and to act upon it and accept it or any part *that they believed to be the*truth, and that they would be authorized to accept it in whole or in part in preference to the sworn testimony, *if they believed it to be the truth.*See *Allen v. State,*194 Ga. 430 (2) (22 S. E. 2d 65); *Dowdell v. State,*194 Ga. 578 (2) (22 S. E. 2d 310).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Gardner, P. J., Townsend and Frankum, JJ., concur.*

*71
      *Casey Thigpen,*for plaintiff in error.

*Thomas A. Hutcheson, Solicitor,*contra.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Ding-Shin “DS” Chang, Chief Executive Officer of Resort Savers, Inc., certify, as of the dates hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Resort Savers, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Resort Savers, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated.

 

Date: May 16, 2019

 

|  | By: | */s/ DS Chang*                                         |  |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------|--|
|  |     | Ding-Shin “DS” Chang                       |  |
|  |     | Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer) |  |

 

I, Boon Jin “Patrick” Tan, Chief Financial Officer of Resort Savers, Inc., certify, as of the dates hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Resort Savers, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Resort Savers, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated.

 

Date: May 16, 2019

 

|  | By: | */s/ Patrick Tan*                                      |  |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------|--|
|  |     | Boon Jin “Patrick” Tan                     |  |
|  |     | Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer) |  |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Resort Savers, Inc. and will be retained by Resort Savers, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 708 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                 House Calendar No. 121
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 708

                          [Report No. 115-521]

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
Rules, and providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 20, 2018

   Mr. Sessions, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
Rules, and providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

    Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII for a 
two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the 
same day it is presented to the House is waived with respect to any 
resolution reported through the legislative day of January 29, 2018.
    Sec. 2.  It shall be in order at any time through the calendar day 
of January 28, 2018, for the Speaker to entertain motions that the 
House suspend the rules as though under clause 1 of rule XV. The 
Speaker or his designee shall consult with the Minority Leader or her 
designee on the designation of any matter for consideration pursuant to 
this section.
                                                 House Calendar No. 121

115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 708

                          [Report No. 115-521]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
Rules, and providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            January 20, 2018

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                              GARDEN BOTANIKA, INC.
                             CALCULATION OF EARNINGS
                     PER COMMON AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE
                                  (EXHIBIT 11)
                  (AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                            (UNAUDITED)
                                                                           QUARTER ENDED
                                                                       --------------------
                                                                       MAY 3,        MAY 4,
                                                                        1997          1996
                                                                       ---------    -------
<S>                                                                     <C>         <C>
PRIMARY:
    Earnings --
       Net earnings (loss) applicable to common and
           common equivalent shares                                     $(10,478)   $(4,997)
                                                                        ========    =======

    Shares --
       Weighted average common shares outstanding                          7,069      7,069
       Net effect of stock options, based on treasury stock
           method using average market price(1)                               --         --
                                                                        --------    -------
  Weighted average common and common equivalent shares                     7,069      7,069
                                                                        ========    =======

 Primary earnings (loss) per common and common equivalent share           $(1.48)    $(0.71)
                                                                        ========    =======
</TABLE>


FULLY DILUTED:
    Fully diluted  earnings (loss) per share is not presented,  as there were no
    potentially dilutive securities.


NOTES:

(1)  In the calculation of weighted average common and common equivalent shares,
     nonqualified stock options and warrants to purchase common stock are
     considered common stock equivalents. Such options and warrants are
     converted using the treasury stock method, which assumes that the shares
     issuable upon exercise of the options or warrants were outstanding for the
     full period. In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,
     no common stock equivalents are shown for the first quarter of either
     fiscal 1999 or 1998, as their effect would have been anti-dilutive.


                                       16