alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1951-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2010-0002]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Vermont (FEMA-1951-DR), dated December 22, 2010, and related determinations.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         December 23, 2010.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Craig A. Gilbert, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

This action terminates the appointment of Albert Lewis as Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

                        The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals                               ( print page 792)                            and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.                    

W. Craig Fugate,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2010-33361 Filed 1-5-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                             STRATEX NETWORKS, INC.

                     CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                   PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
              PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the periodic report of Stratex Networks, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Charles D. Kissner,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof,
solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States
Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

        (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
        or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

        (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
        the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.




Date: February 14, 2003                         /s/ Charles D. Kissner
                                                -----------------------
                                                Charles D. Kissner
                                                Chief Executive Officer
§ 1.279 When must prior notice be submitted to FDA? ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, you must submit the prior notice to FDA and the prior notice submission must be confirmed by FDA for review as follows: ( 1 ) If the article of food is arriving by land by road, no less than 2 hours before arriving at the port of arrival;
( 2 ) If the article of food is arriving by land by rail, no less than 4 hours before arriving at the port of arrival;
( 3 ) If the article of food is arriving by air, no less than 4 hours before arriving at the port of arrival; or
( 4 ) If the article of food is arriving by water, no less than 8 hours before arriving at the port of arrival.
( b ) Except in the case of an article of food imported or offered for import by international mail: ( 1 ) If prior notice is submitted via the Automated Broker Interface/Automated Commercial Environment/International Trade Data System (ABI/ACE/ITDS), you may not submit prior notice more than 30-calendar days before the anticipated date of arrival.
( 2 ) If prior notice is submitted via the FDA Prior Notice System Interface (FDA PNSI), you may not submit prior notice more than 15-calendar days before the anticipated date of arrival.
( c ) Notwithstanding paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, if the article of food is arriving by international mail, you must submit the prior notice before the article of food is sent to the United States.
( d ) FDA will notify you that your prior notice has been confirmed for review with a reply message that contains a Prior Notice (PN) Confirmation Number. Your prior notice will be considered submitted and the prior notice time will start when FDA has confirmed your prior notice for review.
( e ) The PN Confirmation Number must accompany any article of food arriving by international mail. The PN Confirmation Number must appear on the Customs Declaration (e.g., CN22 or CN23 or U.S. equivalent) that accompanies the package.
( f ) A copy of the confirmation, including the PN Confirmation Number, must accompany any article of food that is subject to this subpart when it is carried by or otherwise accompanies an individual when arriving in the United States. The copy of the confirmation must be provided to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) or FDA upon arrival.
( g ) The PN Confirmation Number must accompany any article of food for which the prior notice was submitted through the FDA PNSI when the article arrives in the United States and must be provided to CBP or FDA upon arrival.
[73 FR 66402, Nov. 7, 2008, as amended at 82 FR 15629, Mar. 30, 2017]
38529.

#### UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY COMPANY *et al.*v. GIDDENS.

Townsend, Judge.

In this workmen’s compensation case the claimant Was employed as a crane operator for the employer, Hercules, Inc., and was injured in a fight with fellow employees. The heai’ing director found as a matter of fact that the claimant was the aggressor in the fight with the fellow em-employees and that accordingly the injury was not due to an accident arising out of the employment within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Act. The case was appealed to the superior court and the judge thereof entered an order reversing the award on the grounds that there was not sufficient competent evidence in the record to sustain the award and that the award is contrary to law. The employer and its carrier appealed that judgment to' this court, contending that the findings of fact of the deputy director of the State Board of Workmen’s Compensation were supported by evidence and that, therefore, the superior court was without power to reverse the findings of said deputy director.

The sole question for determination is whether there is any evidence to support the award and, if there is any such evidence, in the absence of fraud, the findings of fact are conclusive on the superior court and on this court. *Weathers v. American Cas. Co.,*94 Ga. App. 530 (95 S. E. 2d 436). The evidence is in sharp conflict. Under the testimony of the claimant and one of his witnesses who was present where the fight occurred, the claimant was in the course of his employment in connection with the fight and was not the aggressor. He would accordingly under his view of the case be entitled to an award. On the other hand the testimony of witnesses for the employer who participated in the fight shows the claimant *577to be the aggressor and under their version the claimant is not entitled to recover. The superior court in reversing the award cites *Scott v. Travelers’ Ins. Co.,*49 Ga. App. 157 (174 S. E. 629); *Wolfe v. Williams,*92 Ga. App. 1 (2) (87 S. E. 2d 436) and points out that there is no substantial difference in the facts of this and those cases. The difference is that in those cases the injured employee was fighting to protect the property of the employer, while here there is nothing in the record to support this theory. On the contrary the hearing director was authorized to find that the injury received by the claimant was the result of a fight with fellow employees, in which the claimant was the aggressor, and which grew out of abusive language exchanged between the claimant and a fellow employee and having to do with the manner in which the fellow employee was performing his duties. Accordingly, this case is controlled by *Kimbro v. Black & White Cab Co.,*50 Ga. App. 143, 144 (177 S. E. 274).

Decided October 13, 1960.

*Bennett, Pedrick & Bennett, Wilson G. Pedrick,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Jack J. Helms,*contra.

The superior court erred in its judgment reversing the award of the Board of Workmen’s Compensation.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Carlisle and Frankum, JJ., concur.*
#### § 835.103 Education, training and skills.

Individuals responsible for developing and implementing measures necessary for ensuring compliance with the requirements of this part shall have the appropriate education, training, and skills to discharge these responsibilities.

[63 FR 59682, Nov. 4, 1998]
§ 200.208 Specific conditions. ( a ) Federal awarding agencies are responsible for ensuring that specific Federal award conditions are consistent with the program design reflected in § 200.202 and include clear performance expectations of recipients as required in § 200.301.
( b ) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may adjust specific Federal award conditions as needed, in accordance with this section, based on an analysis of the following factors: ( 1 ) Based on the criteria set forth in § 200.206;
( 2 ) The applicant or recipient's history of compliance with the general or specific terms and conditions of a Federal award;
( 3 ) The applicant or recipient's ability to meet expected performance goals as described in § 200.211; or
( 4 ) A responsibility determination of an applicant or recipient.
( c ) Additional Federal award conditions may include items such as the following: ( 1 ) Requiring payments as reimbursements rather than advance payments;
( 2 ) Withholding authority to proceed to the next phase until receipt of evidence of acceptable performance within a given performance period;
( 3 ) Requiring additional, more detailed financial reports;
( 4 ) Requiring additional project monitoring;
( 5 ) Requiring the non-Federal entity to obtain technical or management assistance; or
( 6 ) Establishing additional prior approvals.
( d ) If the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity is imposing additional requirements, they must notify the applicant or non-Federal entity as to: ( 1 ) The nature of the additional requirements;
( 2 ) The reason why the additional requirements are being imposed;
( 3 ) The nature of the action needed to remove the additional requirement, if applicable;
( 4 ) The time allowed for completing the actions if applicable; and
( 5 ) The method for requesting reconsideration of the additional requirements imposed.
( e ) Any additional requirements must be promptly removed once the conditions that prompted them have been satisfied.
# L_2018063EN.01000101.xml

| 6.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 63/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 63/1

---

COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2018/324

of 5 March 2018

implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1509 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People's Republic of Korea

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1509 of 30 August 2017 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People's Republic of Korea and repealing Regulation (EC) No 329/2007 (1), and in particular Article 47(5) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 30 August 2017 the Council adopted Regulation (EU) 2017/1509. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 30 August 2017 the Council adopted Regulation (EU) 2017/1509.

| (2) | On 15 February 2018 the United Nations Security Council (‘UNSC’) Committee established pursuant to UNSC Resolution 1718 (2006) amended the listing of an individual subject to restrictive measures. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 15 February 2018 the United Nations Security Council (‘UNSC’) Committee established pursuant to UNSC Resolution 1718 (2006) amended the listing of an individual subject to restrictive measures.

| (3) | Annex XIII to Regulation (EU) 2017/1509 should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex XIII to Regulation (EU) 2017/1509 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex XIII to Regulation (EU) 2017/1509 is amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 5 March 2018.

For the Council

The President

N. DIMOV

---

(1)  
  OJ L 224, 31.8.2017, p. 1.

1

---

ANNEX

In Annex XIII to Regulation (EU) 2017/1509, entry 52 under the heading ‘(a) Natural persons’ is replaced by the following:

| ‘52. | Ri Su Yong | | DOB: 25.6.1968
  Nationality: DPRK
  Passport No: 654310175
  Address: n/a
  Gender: male
  Served as Korea Ryonbong General Corporation representative in Cuba | 2.6.2017 | Official for Korea Ryonbong General Corporation, specialises in acquisition for DPRK's defence industries and support to Pyongyang's military-related sales. Its procurements also probably support the DPRK's chemical weapons programme.’ |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |

‘52.

Ri Su Yong

DOB: 25.6.1968

Nationality: DPRK

Passport No: 654310175

Address: n/a

Gender: male

Served as Korea Ryonbong General Corporation representative in Cuba

2.6.2017

Official for Korea Ryonbong General Corporation, specialises in acquisition for DPRK's defence industries and support to Pyongyang's military-related sales. Its procurements also probably support the DPRK's chemical weapons programme.’

---
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Appellate case name: Jeremy Thomas v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-11-00258-CR

Trial court case number: 1284896

Trial court: 177th District Court, Harris Cnty., Tex.

On October 14, 2011, appellant, Jeremy Thomas, filed a motion to dismiss the abovecaptioned case for want of jurisdiction after the trial court granted his motion for new trial. 

Appellee, the State of Texas, then appealed the trial court’s order granting Thomas’s motion for 

new trial, and that appeal was assigned appellate cause number 01-11-00500-CR.

On December 20, 2012, in cause number 01-11-00500-CR, this Court reversed the order 

of the trial court granting Thomas’s motion for new trial and ordered that the judgment of 

conviction and the sentence be reinstated. We therefore deny Thomas’s motion to dismiss the 

above-captioned case.

The complete record for the above-captioned case has been filed in this Court. Thus, if 

Thomas desires to pursue his appeal from the trial court’s judgment of conviction, his appellate 

brief is due 30 days from the date our mandate in cause number 01-11-00500-CR issues. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). The State’s brief will be due 30 days from the date that appellant’s brief 

is filed. See id. 38.6(b).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Justice Keyes

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: December 20, 2012
§ 709.5 Waiver of polygraph examination requirements. ( a ) *General.* Upon a waiver request submitted under paragraph (b) of this section, DOE may waive the CI-scope polygraph examination under § 709.3 of this part for: ( 1 ) Any covered person based upon certification from another Federal agency that the covered person has successfully completed a full scope or CI-scope polygraph examination administered within the previous five years;
( 2 ) Any covered person who is being treated for a medical or psychological condition that, based upon consultation with the covered person and appropriate medical personnel, would preclude the covered person from being tested; or
( 3 ) Any covered person in the interest of national security.
( b ) *Submission of Waiver Requests.* A covered person may submit a request for waiver under this section, and the request shall assert the basis for the waiver sought and shall be submitted, in writing, to the Director, Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence, at the following address: U.S. Department of Energy, Attn: Director, Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585.
( c ) *Disposition of Waiver Requests.* The Director, Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence, shall issue a written decision on a request for waiver prior to the administration of a polygraph examination. The Director shall obtain the concurrence of the Secretary in his or her decision on a request for waiver under § 709.5(a)(3) and shall obtain the concurrence of the Administrator of NNSA in a decision on a waiver request from an NNSA covered person under § 709.5(a)(1) and § 709.5(a)(2). Notification of approval of a waiver request will contain information regarding the duration of the waiver and any other relevant information. Notification of the denial of a waiver request will state the basis for the denial and state that the covered person may request reconsideration of the denial by the Secretary under § 709.5(d).
( d ) *Reconsideration Rights.* If a waiver is denied, the covered person may file with the Secretary a request for reconsideration of the denial within 30 days of receipt of the decision, and the Secretary's decision will be issued prior to the administration of a polygraph examination.
#### § 1240.30 Measures in the event of inadequate local control.

Whenever the Commissioner of Food and Drugs determines that the measures taken by health authorities of any State or possession (including political subdivisions thereof) are insufficient to prevent the spread of any of the communicable diseases from such State or possession to any other State or possession, he may take such measures to prevent such spread of the diseases as he deems reasonably necessary, including inspection, fumigation, disinfection, sanitation, pest extermination, and destruction of animals or articles believed to be sources of infection.

[40 FR 5620, Feb. 6, 1975, as amended at 48 FR 11431, Mar. 18, 1983]
Editorial Note on Part 13
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 13 appear at 88 FR 45065, July 14, 2023.

§ 13.20 Submissions to a Board. ( a ) Submissions are to be filed with the Dockets Management Staff under § 10.20.
( b ) The person making a submission shall serve copies of it on each participant in the proceeding, except as provided in §§ 13.10(b)(2) and 13.45. Submissions of documentary data and information need not be sent to each participant, but any accompanying transmittal letter, summary, statement of position, certification under paragraph (d) of this section, or similar document must be.
( c ) A submission must be mailed to the address shown in the notice of appearance or personally delivered.
( d ) All submissions are to be accompanied by a certificate of service, or a statement that service is not required.
( e ) No written submission or other portion of the administrative record may be held in confidence, except as provided in §§ 13.10(b)(2) and 13.45.
( f ) A participant who believes that compliance with the requirements of this section constitutes an unreasonable financial burden may submit to the Commissioner a petition to participate in forma pauperis in the form and manner specified in § 12.82.
H. Res. 907

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

July 11, 2006.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it 

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order 

to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 4411) to prevent the 

use of certain payment instruments, credit cards, and fund 

transfers for unlawful Internet gambling, and for other purposes. In lieu of the amendments recommended by the Committees on Financial Services and the Judiciary now printed 

in the bill, the amendment in the nature of a substitute depicted in the Rules Committee Print dated July 5, 2006, 

shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be 

considered as read. The previous question shall be considered 

as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any further 

amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate on the bill, as amended, 

equally divided among and controlled by the chairman and 

ranking minority member of the Committee on Financial 

Services and the chairman and ranking minority member of 

the Committee on the Judiciary; (2) the further amendment 
2

•HRES 907 EH 

printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, if offered by Representative Berkley 

of Nevada or her designee, which shall be in order without 

intervention of any point of order or demand for division of 

the question, shall be considered as read, and shall be separately debatable for 20 minutes equally divided and controlled 

by the proponent and an opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

Attest:

Clerk.
§ 1301.21 Exemption from fees. ( a ) The Administrator shall exempt from payment of an application fee for registration or reregistration: ( 1 ) Any hospital or other institution which is operated by an agency of the United States (including the U.S. Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, Space Force, and Coast Guard), of any State, or any political subdivision or agency thereof.
( 2 ) Any individual practitioner who is required to obtain an individual registration in order to carry out his or her duties as an official of an agency of the United States (including the U.S. Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, Space Force, and Coast Guard), of any State, or any political subdivision or agency thereof.
( b ) In order to claim exemption from payment of a registration or reregistration application fee, the registrant shall have completed the certification on the appropriate application form, wherein the registrant's superior (if the registrant is an individual) or officer (if the registrant is an agency) certifies to the status and address of the registrant and to the authority of the registrant to acquire, possess, or handle controlled substances.
( c ) Exemption from payment of a registration or reregistration application fee does not relieve the registrant of any other requirements or duties prescribed by law.
[62 FR 13950, Mar. 24, 1997, as amended at 86 FR 51822, Sept. 17, 2021]