alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7703

CHAUNCEY E. ORR, Petitioner - Appellant, versus MICHAEL MOORE, Director of South Carolina Department of Corrections; CHARLES M. CONDON, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-98-208-4-13BD) Submitted: March 23, 2000 Decided: March 30, 2000 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Chauncey E. Orr, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Chauncey E. Orr seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because Orr’s notice of appeal was not timely filed. Parties are accorded thirty days after entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court’s order was entered on the docket on March 10, 1999. Orr’s notice of appeal was filed on November 29, 1999. Because Orr failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtainan extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 458 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 458

  Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1436) to provide for 
reconciliation pursuant to title II of the concurrent resolution on the 
                      budget for fiscal year 2017.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 19, 2017

  Mr. Garrett (for himself, Mr. Jordan, Mr. DesJarlais, Mr. Brooks of 
    Alabama, Mr. Posey, Mr. Norman, Mr. Perry, Mr. Duncan of South 
   Carolina, Mr. Amash, Mr. Gosar, Mr. Meadows, Mr. Jody B. Hice of 
 Georgia, Mr. Biggs, Mr. Brat, Mr. Blum, Mr. Budd, Mr. Massie, and Mr. 
Davidson) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                           Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1436) to provide for 
reconciliation pursuant to title II of the concurrent resolution on the 
                      budget for fiscal year 2017.

    Resolved, That immediately upon adoption of this resolution, the 
House shall proceed to the consideration in the House of the bill (H.R. 
1436) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of the 
concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2017. All points of 
order against consideration of the bill are waived. The bill shall be 
considered as read. All points of order against provisions in the bill 
are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
bill and on any further amendment thereto to final passage without 
intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and 
controlled by Representative Garrett of Virginia and the Minority 
Leader or their respective designees; and (2) one motion to recommit.
    Sec. 2.  Clause 1(c) of rule XIX shall not apply to the 
consideration of H.R. 1436.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit











Exhibit 10.1





        
FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE LEAR CORPORATION
2009 LONG-TERM STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
(Amended and Restated as of January 1, 2014)


THIS FIRST AMENDMENT to the Lear Corporation 2009 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan (Amended and Restated as of January 1, 2014) (the “Plan”) was approved on November 16, 2016, by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Lear Corporation, pursuant to the authority reserved to it under Section 15.1 of the Plan, effective as of January 1, 2017.


WITNESSETH THAT:


		
	1.
	The final sentence of Section 6.7 of the Plan is hereby deleted and replaced with the following:




“Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the Committee may, in its sole discretion, permit a Participant to satisfy such Participant’s tax withholding obligation by tendering Shares having a Fair Market Value equal to the amount required to be withheld or other greater amount up to the maximum statutory rate under applicable law, as applicable to such Participant, if such other greater amount would not result in adverse financial accounting treatment, as determined by the Committee (including in connection with the effectiveness of FASB Accounting Standards Update 2016-09).”


		
	2.
	Section 16.2 of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:




“Share Withholding. With respect to withholding required upon the exercise of Options or SARs, upon the lapse of restrictions on Restricted Stock, or upon any other taxable event arising as a result of Awards granted hereunder, the Company may satisfy the withholding requirement for supplemental wages, in whole or in part, by withholding Shares having a Fair Market Value (determined on the date the Participant recognizes taxable income on the Award) equal to the amount required to be withheld or other greater amount up to the maximum statutory rate required to be collected on the transaction under applicable law, as applicable to the Participant, if such other greater amount would not result in adverse financial accounting treatment, as determined by the Committee (including in connection with the effectiveness of FASB Accounting Standards Update 2016-09). The Participant may elect, subject to the approval of the Committee, to deliver the necessary funds to satisfy the withholding obligation to the Company, in which case there will be no reduction in the Shares otherwise distributable to the Participant.”


		
	3.
	Except to the extent hereby amended, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.
H3-/5

ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA # 01-13-00969-CR OFFENSE: OTHER CRIMINAL

Luciano Vargas Padilla v. The State

STYLE: ofTexas COUNTY: Brazoria

COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRM TRIAL COURT: 149th District Court

DATE: 02/03/2015 Publish: YES TC CASE #: 69079

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Luciano Vargas Padilla v. The State

STYLE: ofTexas

PRO SE

CCA#: tt3-/5

Petition

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

tt£sed

DATE: O? (3/20/JJUDGE: uU Ciiy^.^^J^

CCA Disposition:

DATE:

JUDGE:

SIGNED:

PUBLISH:

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

PC:.

DNP:

MOTION FOR

ELECTRONIC RECORD
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

DWAYNE MARSHALL

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 1953

[ August 3 1 , 2017 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Dennis D. Bailey

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 15

- 1527CF10A

.

Dwayne Marshall, Florida City, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ERBER

, C.J., D AMOORGIAN and L EVINE

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
[No. 20998-5-II.

Division Two.

November 26, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Terry Lee Bell, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 96-1-00673-6, Thomas R. Sauriol, J., entered July 19, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Seinfeld, J., concurred in by Morgan and Hunt, JJ.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 25, 2016

a0414

Order 

Clerk

April 25, 2016

151617

PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF CLAWSON,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 151617

COA: 323869

Oakland CC: 2013-137018-AR

JINHEE PARK,

Defendant-Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 9, 2015 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
§ 200.471 Telecommunication costs and video surveillance costs. ( a ) Costs incurred for telecommunications and video surveillance services or equipment such as phones, internet, video surveillance, cloud servers are allowable except for the following circumstances:
( b ) Obligating or expending covered telecommunications and video surveillance services or equipment or services as described in § 200.216 to: ( 1 ) Procure or obtain, extend or renew a contract to procure or obtain;
( 2 ) Enter into a contract (or extend or renew a contract) to procure; or
( 3 ) Obtain the equipment, services, or systems.
[85 FR 49570, Aug. 13, 2020]
#### HITCHCOCK, Appellant, v. EARL, Respondent, et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

January 15, 1915.)

Action by John F. Hitchcock against Edward Earl, impleaded with others.

J. Nicolson, of New York City, for appellant. S. Bacon, of New York City, for respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with §10 costs and disbursements. Order filed.
§ 1401.12 Fees to be charged—miscellaneous provisions. ( a ) Payment for FOIA services may be made by check or money order made payable to the Treasury of the United States.
( b ) ONDCP may require advance payment where the estimated fee exceeds $250, or a requester previously failed to pay within 30 days of the billing date.
( c ) ONDCP may assess interest charges beginning the 31st day of billing. Interest will be at the rate prescribed in section 3717 of title 31 of the United States Code and will accrue from the date of the billing.
( d ) ONDCP may assess search charges where records are not located or where records are exempt from disclosure.
( e ) ONDCP may aggregate individual requests for fee purposes in accordance with 1401.16.
§ 74.57 Alarm resolution. ( a ) Licensees subject to § 74.51 shall provide the MC&A alarm resolution capabilities described in paragraphs (b) through (f) of this section.
( b ) Licensees shall resolve the nature and cause of any MC&A alarm within approved time periods.
( c ) Each licensee shall notify the NRC Operations Center by telephone of any MC&A alarm that remains unresolved beyond the time period specified for its resolution in the licensee's fundamental nuclear material control plan. Notification must occur within 24 hours except when a holiday or weekend intervenes in which case the notification must occur on the next scheduled workday. The licensee may consider an alarm to be resolved if: ( 1 ) Clerical or computational error is found that clearly was the cause for the alarm; or
( 2 ) An assignable cause for the alarm is identified or it is substantiated that no material loss has occurred.
( d ) If a material loss has occurred, the licensee shall determine the amount of SSNM lost and take corrective action to: ( 1 ) Return out-of-place SSNM, if possible, to its appropriate place;
( 2 ) Update and correct associated records; and
( 3 ) Modify the MC&A system, if appropriate, to prevent similar future occurrences.
( e ) The licensee shall provide an ability to rapidly assess the validity of alleged thefts.
( f ) If an abrupt loss detection estimate exceeds five formula kilograms of SSNM: ( 1 ) Material processing operations related to the alarm must be suspended until completion of planned alarm resolution activities, unless the suspension of operations will adversely affect the ability to resolve the alarm. Operation of continuous processes may continue for 24 hours from the time of the occurrence of the alarm during which time checks shall be made for mistakes in records or calculations that could have caused the alarm.
( 2 ) Within 24 hours, the licensee shall notify the NRC Operations Center by telephone that an MC&A alarm resolution procedure has been initiated.
[52 FR 10040, Mar. 30, 1987, as amended at 54 FR 6877, Feb. 15, 1989; 55 FR 5979, Feb. 21, 1990; 60 FR 24553, May 9, 1995; 67 FR 78148, Dec. 23, 2002]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned, Stephen I. Sadove, Chief Executive Officer of Saks Incorporated (the Company), has
executed this certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 3, 2007 (the Report).

The undersigned hereby certifies that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 6th day of December, 2007.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Stephen I. Sadove  
|Stephen I. Sadove      
|Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Saks Incorporated
and will be retained by Saks Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 1314.110 Reports for mail-order sales. ( a ) Each regulated person required to report under § 1310.03(c) of this chapter must either: ( 1 ) Submit a written report, containing the information set forth in paragraph (b) of this section, on or before the 15th day of each month following the month in which the distributions took place. The report must be submitted under company letterhead, signed by the person authorized to sign on behalf of the regulated seller, to the Regulatory Section, Diversion Control Division, Drug Enforcement Administration (see the Table of DEA Mailing Addresses in § 1321.01 of this chapter for the current mailing address); or
( 2 ) Upon request to and approval by the Administration, submit the report in electronic form, either via computer disk or direct electronic data transmission, in such form as the Administration shall direct. Requests to submit reports in electronic form should be submitted to the Regulatory Section, Diversion Control Division, Drug Enforcement Administration. See the Table of DEA Mailing Addresses in § 1321.01 of this chapter for the current mailing address.
( b ) Each monthly report must provide the following information for each distribution: ( 1 ) Supplier name and registration number;
( 2 ) Purchaser's name and address;
( 3 ) Name/address shipped to (if different from purchaser's name/address);
( 4 ) Method used to verify the identity of the purchaser and, where applicable, person to whom product is shipped;
( 5 ) Name of the chemical contained in the scheduled listed chemical product and total quantity shipped (e.g. pseudoephedrine, 3 grams);
( 6 ) Date of shipment;
( 7 ) Product name;
( 8 ) Dosage form (e.g., tablet, liquid);
( 9 ) Dosage strength (e.g., 30mg, 60mg, per dose etc.);
( 10 ) Number of dosage units (e.g., 100 doses per package);
( 11 ) Package type (blister pack, etc.);
( 12 ) Number of packages;
( 13 ) Lot number.
[71 FR 56024, Sept. 26, 2006, as amended at 75 FR 10684, Mar. 9, 2010; 81 FR 97040, Dec. 30, 2016]
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-13-0001761 27-AUG-2014 07:56 AM
EXHIBIT 32

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CirTran Corporation on Form 10-QSB
for the period ending September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Iehab Hawatmeh, President
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

November 11, 2003
                                  /s/ Iehab Hawatmeh
                                 ------------------------------------------
                                  Iehab J. Hawatmeh
                                  President and Chief Financial Officer
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1070 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain cases for toys. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 18, 2005 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain cases for toys. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN CASES FOR TOYS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.42.02 Cases or containers (provided for in subheading 

4202.12.80) specially designed, marketed or intended 

for transporting, storing or 

protecting toys or other articles provided for in headings 

9502-9504, inclusive ............ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 
2 

•S 1070 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
----

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlantis Business DevelopmentCorporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005,as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I Christopher Dubeau, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

By: 

***/s/ Christopher Dubeau   ***

Christopher Dubeau

CEO

Dated:     May16, 2005

----
```

[108th Congress Public Law 252]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ252.108]

[[Page 118 STAT. 686]]

Public Law 108-252
108th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  410 Huston Street in Altamont, Kansas, as the ``Myron V. George Post 
            Office''. <<NOTE: June 25, 2004 -  [H.R. 3733]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 410 
Huston Street in Altamont, Kansas, shall be known and designated as the 
``Myron V. George Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Myron V. George Post 
Office''.

    Approved June 25, 2004.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3733:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):
            Mar. 16, considered and passed House.
            June 9, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
227 So.2d 597

#### Frank T. STEWART et al. v. SEWERAGE DISTRICT NO. 2 OF the PARISH OF ST. CHARLES.

No. 50209.

Nov. 13, 1969.

In re: Mrs. Marvel Berry et al. applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Application denied. The showing made by relators is insufficient to entitle them to the relief prayed for.
----

Exhibit

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(18        U.S.C.SECTION 1350)**

|   | (1) | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the Company                  for the periods presented in the Report. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:                  /s/   John                  P.                  Broderick                      |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | John                  P. Broderick                                                                                                                                                                                          |
|   | Chief                  Executive and Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                      |
|   | (Principal                  Financial and Accounting Officer)                                                                                                                                                               |
|   | March                  30, 2007                                                                                                                                                                                             |

----