alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 42 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 42

 Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to provide for the 
consideration of reported bills or joint resolutions that have not been 
            considered by the House within 60 calendar days.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 10, 2017

  Mr. Peters (for himself, Mr. Marino, and Mr. Kilmer) submitted the 
   following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to provide for the 
consideration of reported bills or joint resolutions that have not been 
            considered by the House within 60 calendar days.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. CONSIDERATION.

    Rule XIV of the Rules of the House of Representatives is amended by 
adding at the end the following new clause:
    ``7. If a bill or joint resolution reported by a committee has not 
been considered within 60 calendar days, the chair and ranking minority 
member of that committee, or the chair and ranking minority member of 
the applicable subcommittee of that committee may jointly offer a 
motion under clause 4 or 5, as applicable, for the consideration of 
such bill or joint resolution.''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by section 1 shall apply to bills or joint 
resolutions reported by any committee after the date of adoption of 
this resolution.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 1308.02 Definitions.

Any term contained in this part shall have the definition set forth in section 102 of the Act (21 U.S.C. 802) or part 1300 of this chapter.

[62 FR 13967, Mar. 24, 1997]
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-14-00414-CV

IN RE ORDER OF FORECLOSURE CONCERNING 3713 MARTZ LANE,

McALLEN, TX 78504

On Appeal from the

139th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. C-5555-13-C

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

October 30, 2014
Editorial Note on Part 112
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 112 appear at 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 112.42 What requirements apply to inspecting and maintaining my agricultural water systems? ( a ) *Inspection of your agricultural water systems.* At the beginning of a growing season, as appropriate, but at least once annually, you must inspect all of your agricultural water systems, to the extent they are under your control, to identify any conditions that are reasonably likely to introduce known or reasonably foreseeable hazards into or onto covered produce or food contact surfaces, including consideration of the following: ( 1 ) The nature of each agricultural water source (for example, whether it is ground water or surface water);
( 2 ) The extent of your control over each agricultural water source;
( 3 ) The degree of protection of each agricultural water source;
( 4 ) Use of adjacent and nearby land; and
( 5 ) The likelihood of introduction of known or reasonably foreseeable hazards to agricultural water by another user of agricultural water before the water reaches your covered farm.
( b ) *Maintenance of your agricultural water systems.* You must adequately maintain all agricultural water systems, to the extent they are under your control, as necessary and appropriate to prevent the systems from being a source of contamination to covered produce, food contact surfaces, or areas used for a covered activity. Such maintenance includes: ( 1 ) Regularly monitoring each system to identify any conditions that are reasonably likely to introduce known or reasonably foreseeable hazards into or onto covered produce or food contact surfaces;
( 2 ) Correcting any significant deficiencies (such as control of cross-connections and repairs to well caps, well casings, sanitary seals, piping tanks, and treatment equipment);
( 3 ) Properly storing equipment and keeping the source and distribution system free of debris, trash, domesticated animals, and other possible sources of contamination of covered produce to the extent practicable and appropriate under the circumstances; and
( 4 ) As necessary and appropriate, implementing measures reasonably necessary to reduce the potential for contamination of covered produce with known or reasonably foreseeable hazards resulting from contact of covered produce with pooled water (for example, through use of protective barriers or through equipment adjustments).
§ 1240.65 Psittacine birds. ( a ) The term psittacine birds shall include all birds commonly known as parrots, Amazons, Mexican double heads, African grays, cocatoos, macaws, parakeets, love birds, lories, lorikeets, and all other birds of the psittacine family.
( b ) No person shall transport, or offer for transportation, in interstate traffic any psittacine bird unless the shipment is accompanied by a permit from the State health department of the State of destination where required by such department.
( c ) Whenever the Surgeon General finds that psittacine birds or human beings in any area are infected with psittacosis and there is such danger of transmission of psittacosis from such area as to endanger the public health, he may declare it an area of infection. No person shall thereafter transport, or offer for transportation, in interstate traffic any psittacine bird from such area, except shipments authorized by the Surgeon General for purposes of medical research and accompanied by a permit issued by him, until the Surgeon General finds that there is no longer any danger of transmission of psittacosis from such area. As used in this paragraph, the term “area” includes, but is not limited to, specific premises or buildings.
(logo)**Situs**®

101 MontgomeryStreet, Suite 2250

SanFrancisco, CA 94104

Situs.com

 

 

 **ANNUALCOMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

**For the period ofJanuary 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (“****Reporting Period****”)**

** **

 

Re: Deutsche Mortgage& Asset Receiving Corporation COMM 2013-CCRE7, Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates, Series COMM 2013-CCRE7 (the “Transaction”),issued pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 1,2013 (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”), by and among Deutsche Mortgage& Asset Receiving Corporation, as Depositor, Midland Loan Services, adivision of PNC Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Situs Holdings,LLC, as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee,Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and Park Bridge LenderServices, LLC, as Operating Advisor

 

Capitalizedterms used but not defined herein have the meanings set forth in the Poolingand Servicing Agreement.

 

SitusHoldings, LLC, as Special Servicer, (a “Certifying Servicer”) isresponsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2018 for the ReportingPeriod with the applicable servicing criteria specified in Paragraph (d) ofItem 1122 of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB (the“Relevant Servicing Criteria”).

 

TheSpecial Servicer has assessed its compliance with the Relevant ServicingCriteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the Special Servicerhas complied, in all material respects, with the Relevant Servicing Criteria asof December 31, 2018 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platformtaken as a whole. 

 

AsExecutive Managing Director of Situs Holdings, LLC, I certify that:

 

(A)A review of the Special Servicer’s activities during the Reporting Period andof Situs Holdings, LLC’s performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreementhas been made under my supervision; and

 

(B) Tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer hasfulfilled all its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement in allmaterial respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

 

 

Date: February 22, 2019

 

SitusHoldings, LLC

 

By:/s/ George Wisniewski 

GeorgeWisniewski 

ExecutiveManaging Director

 

By:/s/ Stacey Ciarlanti

StaceyCiarlanti

VicePresident, Compliance

 

 

 EVALUATE• OPIMIZE • MANAGE
## IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

August 16, 2024 SC-2024-0413 Ex parte Colton Trent Ketchum PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS (In re: Colton Trent Ketchum v. State of Alabama) (Mobile Circuit Court: CC-21-2979; Criminal Appeals: CR-2023-0611).

CERTIFICATE OF JUDGMENT WHEREAS, the petition for writ of certiorari in the above referenced cause has been duly submitted and considered by the Supreme Court of Alabama and the judgment indicated below was entered in this cause on August 16, 2024: Writ Denied. No Opinion. Mitchell, J. -- Parker, C.J., and Shaw, Bryan, and Mendheim, JJ., concur. NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Rule 41, Ala. R. App. P., IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this Court's judgment in this cause is certified on this date. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise ordered by this Court or agreed upon by the parties, the costs of this cause are hereby taxed as provided by Rule 35, Ala. R. App. P.

I, Megan B. Rhodebeck, certify that this is the record of the judgment of the Court, witness my hand and seal.

Clerk, Supreme Court of Alabama
§ 105.65 Infant foods. ( a ) If a food (other than a dietary supplement of vitamins and/or minerals alone) purports to be or is represented for special dietary use for infants, the label shall bear, if such food is fabricated from two or more ingredients, the common or usual name of each ingredient, including spices, flavoring, and coloring.
( b ) If such food, or any ingredient thereof, consists in whole or in part of plant or animal matter and the name of such food or ingredient does not clearly reveal the specific plant or animal which is its source, such name shall be so qualified as to reveal clearly the specific plant or animal that is such source.
[42 FR 14328, Mar. 15, 1977, as amended at 47 FR 947, Jan. 8, 1982; 49 FR 10090, Mar. 19, 1984; 50 FR 1840, Jan. 14, 1985]
§ 1141.1 Scope. ( a ) This part sets forth the requirements for the display of required warnings on cigarette packages and in advertisements for cigarettes.
( b ) The requirements of this part do not apply to manufacturers or distributors of cigarettes that do not manufacture, package, or import cigarettes for sale or distribution within the United States.
( c ) A cigarette retailer will not be in violation of § 1141.10 for packaging that: ( 1 ) Contains a warning;
( 2 ) Is supplied to the retailer by a license- or permit-holding tobacco product manufacturer, or distributor; and
( 3 ) Is not altered by the retailer in a way that is material to the requirements of section 4 of the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act (15 U.S.C. 1333) or this part.
( d ) Section 1141.10(d) applies to a cigarette retailer only if that retailer is responsible for or directs the warnings required under § 1141.10 for advertising. However, this paragraph (d) does not relieve a retailer of liability if the retailer displays, in a location open to the public, an advertisement that does not contain a warning or has been altered by the retailer in a way that is material to the requirements of section 4 of the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act or this part.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-30-1997
<CASH>                                         1,516,862
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,127,221
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (98,174)
<INVENTORY>                                    1,452,834
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               177,233
<PP&E>                                         1,410,016
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,183,146)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,402,846
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,604,679
<BONDS>                                        446,271
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       100,154
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,251,742
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4,402,846
<SALES>                                        1,535,438
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,535,438
<CGS>                                          821,625
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,006,660
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             5,481
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (298,328)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (298,328)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.32)
        

</TABLE>
BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, FOURTEENTH DISTRICT, AT HOUSTON

No. 14-14-00302-CV

Omega Lout

v.

The Methodist Hospital

(No. 2013-55155 IN 333RD DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID/DUE STATUS PAID BY

MT FEE

MT FEE

MT FEE

RPT RECORD

CLK RECORD

FILING

STATEWIDE EFILING

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$136.50

$66.00

$175.00

$20.00

05/08/2015

07/25/2014

06/26/2014

05/28/2014

05/27/2014

04/24/2014

04/24/2014

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

PAID

PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

The costs incurred on appeal to the Fourteenth Court of Appeals Houston, Texas 

are $427.50.

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE, CLERK OF THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF 

APPEALS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing 

is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE 

FOURTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and payments, in the 

above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness 

my hand and the Seal of the COURT 

OF APPEALS for the Fourteenth District 

of Texas, September 3, 2015.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> BD
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1995
<CASH>                                        16444829
<RECEIVABLES>                                452755495
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                  0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                          6159400
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                          250730836
<PP&E>                                         7079705
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               833108740
<SHORT-TERM>                                 392763528
<PAYABLES>                                   174810467
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                          143949065
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                                   0
<LONG-TERM>                                   48500000
<COMMON>                                        117024
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                    72968656
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 833108740
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                    0
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                          12671566
<COMMISSIONS>                                 33885623
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                        0
<FEE-REVENUE>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             6961042
<COMPENSATION>                                13301776
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               11258362
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   6232213
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .48
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 833 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 833

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                          June 6, 2006.
Whereas women of all backgrounds have the power to greatly reduce their risk of 
        common diseases through preventive measures such as a healthy lifestyle 
        and frequent medical screenings;
Whereas significant disparities exist in the prevalence of disease among women 
        of different backgrounds, including women with disabilities, African 
        American women, Asian/Pacific Islander women, Latinas, and American 
        Indian/Alaska Native women;
Whereas since healthy habits should begin at a young age, and preventive care 
        saves Federal dollars designated to health care, it is important to 
        raise awareness among women and girls of key female health issues;
Whereas National Women's Health Week begins on Mother's Day annually and 
        celebrates the efforts of national and community organizations working 
        with partners and volunteers to improve awareness of key women's health 
        issues; and
Whereas in 2006, the week of May 14 through May 20, is dedicated as the National 
        Women's Health Week: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the importance of preventing diseases that commonly 
        affect women;
            (2) calls on the people of the United States to use National Women's 
        Health Week as an opportunity to learn about health issues that face 
        women;
            (3) calls on the women of the United States to observe National 
        Women's Check-Up Day by receiving preventive screenings from their 
        health care providers; and
            (4) recognizes the importance of programs that provide research and 
        collect data on common diseases in women.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned, Stephen I. Sadove, Chief Executive Officer of Saks Incorporated (the Company), has
executed this certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 28, 2006 (the Report).

The undersigned hereby certifies that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 6th day of December 2006.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Stephen I. Sadove  
|Stephen I. Sadove      
|Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Saks Incorporated
and will be retained by Saks Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
32





Certification


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code)








Pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63
of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of FNB United
Corp., a North Carolina corporation (the “Corporation”), does hereby certify
that:





The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Corporation fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents,
in all materials respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Corporation.








Date:    November
      7, 2008
            /s/
      Michael
      C. MillerMichael C. MillerChief Executive OfficerDate:    November
      7, 2008
            /s/
      Mark
      A. SeversonMark A. SeversonChief Financial Officer








The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States
Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate
disclosure document.


36
----

| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities      Exchange Act of 1934; and |   |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      for the periods presented in theReport. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:                                               |  /s/   John P.      Broderick                         |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | John      P. Broderick                            |
|   | Chief      Executive and Financial Officer        |
|   | (Principal      Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|   | March      31,2009                                |

----
§ 962.3 Byproduct material. ( a ) For purposes of this part, the term *byproduct material* means any radioactive material (except special nuclear material) yielded in or made radioactive by exposure to the radiation incident to the process of producing or utilizing special nuclear material.
( b ) For purposes of determining the applicability of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (42 U.S.C. 6901 *et seq.*) to any radioactive waste substance owned or produced by the Department of Energy pursuant to the exercise of its atomic energy research, development, testing and production responsibilities under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2011 *et seq.*), the words “any radioactive material,” as used in paragraph (a) of this section, refer only to the actual radionuclides dispersed or suspended in the waste substance. The nonradioactive hazardous component of the waste substance will be subject to regulation under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act.