alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 172

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 172 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; 70 FR 72074, Dec. 1, 2005; and 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

#### § 172.834 Ethoxylated mono- and diglycerides.

The food additive ethoxylated mono-and diglycerides (polyoxyethylene (20) mono- and diglycerides of fatty acids) (polyglycerate 60) may be safely used in food in accordance with the following prescribed conditions:

(a) The food additive is manufactured by:

(1) Glycerolysis of edible fats primarily composed of stearic, palmitic, and myristic acids; or

(2) Direct esterification of glycerol with a mixture of primarily stearic, palmitic, and myristic acids;

to yield a product with less than 0.3 acid number and less than 0.2 percent water, which is then reacted with ethylene oxide.

(b) The additive meets the following specifications:

Saponification number, 65-75.

Acid number, 0-2.

Hydroxyl number, 65-80.

Oxyethylene content, 60.5-65.0 percent.

(c) The additive is used or intended for use in the following foods when standards of identity established under section 401 of the Act do not preclude such use:

| Use | Limitations |
| --- | --- |
| 1. As an emulsifier in pan-release agents for and as a dough conditioner in yeast-leavened bakery products | Not to exceed levels required to produce the intended effects, total not to exceed 0.5 percent by weight of the flour used. |
| 2. As an emulsifier in cakes and cake mixes | Not to exceed 0.5 percent by weight of the dry ingredients. |
| 3. As an emulsifier in whipped vegetable oil toppings and topping mixes | Not to exceed 0.45 percent by weight of the finished whipped vegetable oil toppings. |
| 4. As an emulsifier in icings and icing mixes | Not to exceed 0.5 percent by weight of the finished icings. |
| 5. As an emulsifier in frozen desserts | Not to exceed 0.2 percent by weight of the finished frozen desserts. |
| 6. As an emulsifier in edible vegetable fat-water emulsions intended for use as substitutes for milk or cream in beverage coffee | Not to exceed 0.4 percent by weight of the finished vegetable fat-water emulsions. |

(d) When the name “polyglycerate 60” is used in labeling it shall be followed by either “polyoxyethylene (20) mono-and diglycerides of fatty acids” or “ethoxylated mono- and diglycerides” in parentheses.

[42 FR 14491, Mar. 15, 1977, as amended at 42 FR 37973, July 26, 1977; 50 FR 49536, Dec. 3, 1985]
**AIMD-21.2.6**                      Published: Apr 01, 2000. Publicly Released: Apr 01, 2000.                  

-   
-   
-   
-   

    Jump To:  
-  Elder Abuse 
-  Services for Older Adults 
-  State and Local-Level Drivers and Trends 
-  State and Local Fiscal Projections 
-  Federal Borrowing 
-  Managing the Debt 
-  Summary of Funding Provisions 
-  Auditing the Government's Books 
-  Unpacking the Financial Report 
-  Highlights 
-  Recommendations 
-  Background 
-  About This Work 
-  About This Work 
-  Trends 
-  About the Center 
-  Why It's High Risk 
-  What Remains To Be Done 
-  Key Reports 
-  Newest COVID-Related Reports 
-  AI Use Cases 
-  Flood Insurance 
-  Past Pandemic-Related Reports 
-  CARES Act Oversight Reports 
-  All COVID-19 Reports 
-  Report Suspected Fraud 
-  Subjects 
-  How to Get Notified 
-  Past Reports 
-  Public Health Threats 
-  Explore the FY 2022 and 2023 Funds 
-  Status of FY22 Projects 
-  Lessons Learned 
-  Agency Reports 
-  Recent Reports 
-  Recommendations 
-  Supplemental Material 
-  Full Report 
-  Additional Data 
-  View Decision 
-  Downloads 
-  Previously Identified Actions 
-  Related Pages 
-  Associated Agencies 
-  Tough Choices and Opportunities Ahead 
-  Americas Fiscal Future Key Areas 
-  Retirement Security Key Areas 
-  Current List 
-  About The High Risk List 
-  Area Ratings 
-  Previous High Risk Products 
-  Search Federal Vacancies 
-  Past Federal Vacancies 
-  Violation Letters 
-  About the Yellow Book 
-  Advisory Council 
-  Related Resources 
-  Comment Letters 
-  Related Publications 
-  Contacts and Resources 
-  Major Issues Facing the Nation 
-  Meeting Strategic Challenges 
-  Additional Resources 
-  Resources 
-  GAO Contacts 
-  Mission Teams 
-  Operations and Staff Offices  
-  Organization Chart  
-  Why a Career at GAO? 
-  Am I Qualified? 
-  Company Culture 
-  Reasonable Accommodations 
-  Video Gallery 
-  Paid Internships 
-  Student Volunteers 
-  Professional Development Program 
-  Advancement 
-  Executive Candidate Program 
-  Summer Associates 
-  Externships 
-  Benefits 
-  Contacts 

Skip to Highlights

## Highlights

GAO published a checklist to assist: (1) agencies in implementing and monitoring their direct loan systems; and (2) management and auditors in reviewing their direct loan systems to determine if they are in substantial compliance with the Federal Financial Management Improvement Act.

## Full Report

Full Report (69 pages)

## Office of Public Affairs

### Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
kaczmareks@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

### Public Inquiries

Public Affairs
PublicAffairs@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

## Topics

Auditing and Financial Management

Auditing proceduresAuditing standardsDirect loansFederal agency accounting systemsFinancial management systemsInternal controlsLoan accounting systemsFinancial managementSystem requirementsAuditors
### JUDGMENT 

## Court of Appeals First District of Texas

NO. 01

- 13

- 00897

- CR

CESAR ROCHA , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee
Appeal from the County Criminal Court at Law No. 1 of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 1914250).

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by the trial court on September 11, 2013. After submitting the case on the appellate record and the arguments properly raised by the parties, the Court holds that the trial court’s judgment contains no reversible error. Accordingly, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance.

Judgment rendered March 12, 2015.

Panel consists of Justices Higley and Bland. Opinion delivered by Justice Bland.
#### § 1316.49 Waiver of hearing.

In proceedings other than those conducted under part 1301 or part 1309 of this chapter, any person entitled to a hearing may, within the period permitted for filing a request for hearing or notice of appearance, file with the Administrator a waiver of an opportunity for a hearing, together with a written statement regarding his position on the matters of fact and law involved in such hearing. Such statement, if admissible, shall be made a part of the record and shall be considered in light of the lack of opportunity for cross-examination in determining the weight to be attached to matters of fact asserted therein.

[36 FR 7820, Apr. 24, 1971, as amended at 87 FR 68045, Nov. 14, 2022]
#### DONOHUE v. MELVIN STABLE CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

January 29, 1915.)

In the matter of Annie Donohue against the Melvin Stable Company.

No opinion. Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with §10 costs, unless appellant comply with terms stated in order. Order filed.
§ 1140.32 Format and content requirements for labeling and advertising. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, each manufacturer, distributor, and retailer advertising or causing to be advertised, disseminating or causing to be disseminated, any labeling or advertising for cigarettes or smokeless tobacco shall use only black text on a white background. This section does not apply to advertising: ( 1 ) In any facility where vending machines and self- service displays are permitted under this part, provided that the advertising is not visible from outside the facility and that it is affixed to a wall or fixture in the facility; or
( 2 ) Appearing in any publication (whether periodic or limited distribution) that the manufacturer, distributor, or retailer demonstrates is an adult publication. For the purposes of this section, an adult publication is a newspaper, magazine, periodical, or other publication: ( i ) Whose readers younger than 18 years of age constitute 15 percent or less of the total readership as measured by competent and reliable survey evidence; and
( ii ) That is read by fewer than 2 million persons younger than 18 years of age as measured by competent and reliable survey evidence.
( b ) Labeling and advertising in an audio or video format shall be limited as follows: ( 1 ) Audio format shall be limited to words only with no music or sound effects.
( 2 ) Video formats shall be limited to static black text only on a white background. Any audio with the video shall be limited to words only with no music or sound effects.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 174 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                  House Calendar No. 16
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 174

                          [Report No. 115-26]

      Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1301) making 
appropriations for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending 
              September 30, 2017, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 7, 2017

    Ms. Cheney, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
      Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1301) making 
appropriations for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending 
              September 30, 2017, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 1301) making 
appropriations for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending 
September 30, 2017, and for other purposes. All points of order against 
consideration of the bill are waived. The bill shall be considered as 
read. All points of order against provisions in the bill are waived. 
The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and on 
any amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion 
except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the 
chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations; 
and (2) one motion to recommit.
    Sec. 2.  The chair of the Committee on Appropriations may insert in 
the Congressional Record not later than Wednesday, March 8, 2017, such 
material as he may deem explanatory of H.R. 1301.
                                                  House Calendar No. 16

115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 174

                          [Report No. 115-26]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

      Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1301) making 
appropriations for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending 
              September 30, 2017, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 7, 2017

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
NO. 07-06-0269-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

JUNE 22, 2007

______________________________

TERRY LYN STONE, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 112721; HONORABLE PAMELA C. SIRMON, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

Pending before this Court is appellant’s motion to dismiss his appeal. Appellant and his

attorney both have signed the document stating that appellant withdraws his appeal. Tex. R. App.

P. 42.2(a). No decision of this Court having been delivered to date, we grant the motion.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. No motion for rehearing will be entertained and our

mandate will issue forthwith.

Mackey K. Hancock

 Justice

Do not publish.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 6893** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. JOHN MCKINLEY BEESON , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro
. Thomas David Schroeder , District Judge. ( 1:05

- cr - 00315

- TDS

- 2; 1:09

- cv - 00152

- T DS

- WWD )

Submitted : January 31, 2012 Decided: February 2, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. John McKinley Beeson, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Francis Joseph, Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: John McKinley Beeson seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2011) motion. The order is not appealable unless a ci rcuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When th e district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Beeson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability , deny Beeson’s motion t o proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials3 before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

DISMISSED
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear at 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 117.257 Contents of an order to withdraw a qualified facility exemption. An order to withdraw a qualified facility exemption under § 117.5(a) must include the following information: ( a ) The date of the order;
( b ) The name, address, and location of the qualified facility;
( c ) A brief, general statement of the reasons for the order, including information relevant to one or both of the following circumstances that leads FDA to issue the order: ( 1 ) An active investigation of a foodborne illness outbreak that is directly linked to the facility; or
( 2 ) Conditions or conduct associated with a qualified facility that are material to the safety of the food manufactured, processed, packed, or held at such facility.
( d ) A statement that the facility must either: ( 1 ) Comply with subparts C and G of this part on the date that is 120 calendar days after the date of receipt of the order, or within a reasonable timeframe, agreed to by FDA, based on a written justification, submitted to FDA, for a timeframe that exceeds 120 calendar days from the date of receipt of the order; or
( 2 ) Appeal the order within 15 calendar days of the date of receipt of the order in accordance with the requirements of § 117.264.
( e ) A statement that a facility may request that FDA reinstate an exemption that was withdrawn by following the procedures in § 117.287;
( f ) The text of section 418(l) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and of this subpart;
( g ) A statement that any informal hearing on an appeal of the order must be conducted as a regulatory hearing under part 16 of this chapter, with certain exceptions described in § 117.270;
( h ) The mailing address, telephone number, email address, fax number, and name of the FDA Division Director in whose division the facility is located (or, in the case of a foreign facility, the same information for the Director of the Office of Compliance in the Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition); and
( i ) The name and the title of the FDA representative who approved the order.
[80 FR 56145, Sept. 17, 2015, as amended at 81 FR 3716, Jan. 22, 2016; 85 FR 16553, Mar. 24, 2020]
#### § 1230.44 Samples.

On the same day that samples are requested by the district, the District Director of Customs or appraiser shall notify the importer that samples will be taken, that the containers must be held intact pending a notice of the result of inspection and analysis, and that in case the containers do not comply with the requirements of the Federal Caustic Poison Act, they must be returned to the District Director of Customs for disposition. This notification may be given by the District Director of Customs or appraiser through individual notices to the importer or by suitable bulletin notices posted daily in the customhouse.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                     EXHIBIT 5.1
 
                           [PERKINS COIE LETTERHEAD]
 
                                August 29, 1997
 
InControl, Inc.
6675 - 185th Ave. NE
Redmond, WA 98052
 
          RE: REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM S-3
 
Gentlemen and Ladies:
 
     We have acted as counsel to you in connection with the preparation of a
Registration Statement on Form S-3 (the "Registration Statement") under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Act"), which you are filing with the
Securities and Exchange Commission for the resale of up to 875,000 shares of
Common Stock, $.01 par value (the "Shares"). We have examined the Registration
Statement and such documents and records of the Company and other documents as
we have deemed necessary for the purpose of this opinion.
 
     Based upon and subject to the foregoing, we are of the opinion that the
Shares have been duly authorized and are validly issued, fully paid and
nonassessable.
 
     We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement. In giving such consent, we do not admit that we are in
the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Act.
 
                                          Very truly yours,
 
                                          Perkins Coie
EXHIBIT 32

                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of AMCOL
International Corporation (the "Company") certifies that the quarterly report on
Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q/A fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Date:  April 13, 2005                                    /s/ Lawrence E. Washow
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Lawrence E. Washow
                                                         Chief Executive Officer

Date:  April 13, 2005                                    /s/ Gary L. Castagna
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Gary L. Castagna
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON THE FORM 10-QSB FOR THE THREE MONTH
PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         147,247
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  837,924
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (54,179)
<INVENTORY>                                  1,306,987
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,418,260
<PP&E>                                       2,390,262
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,048,359
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,610,104
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,969,072
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,489
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,947,306
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,610,104
<SALES>                                      1,589,933
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,589,933
<CGS>                                        1,094,643
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  716,126
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                51,153
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              50,670
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (322,659)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (322,659)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (322,659)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.019)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.019)
        

</TABLE>