alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of Longs Drug Stores Corporation (the Company) hereby certify, to such
officers knowledge, that:

(i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended
April 27, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                                                  
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|                      |  | 
|Date: August 31, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/    WARREN F. BRYANT                          
|                      |  |  |  | Warren F. Bryant                                 
|                      |  |  |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer  
|                      |  | 
|Date: August 31, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/    STEVEN F. MCCANN                          
|                      |  |  |  | Steven F. McCann                                 
|                      |  |  |  | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Longs Drug Stores Corporation and will be retained by Longs Drug Stores Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS IN THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
OF DIGITAL MICROWAVE CORPORATION FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          23,560
<SECURITIES>                                     6,592
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,796
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,399
<INVENTORY>                                     81,703
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,894
<PP&E>                                         102,019
<DEPRECIATION>                                  50,598
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 249,421
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,374
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           617
<OTHER-SE>                                     199,218
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   249,421
<SALES>                                        118,496
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               118,496
<CGS>                                           94,978
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   94,978
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                51,369
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,847
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  36
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (26,498)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        97
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (26,595)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (26,595)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.43)


</TABLE>
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1132 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to make permanent the 

removal of the rental cap for durable medical equipment under the 

Medicare program with respect to speech generating devices. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 16, 2017 

Mr. CASSIDY (for himself, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, and Mr. KING) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to make 

permanent the removal of the rental cap for durable 

medical equipment under the Medicare program with 

respect to speech generating devices. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Steve Gleason Act of 

5 2017’’. 


rfrederick on DSK30NT082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1132 IS

1 SEC. 2. MAKING PERMANENT THE REMOVAL OF THE RENT2 AL CAP FOR DURABLE MEDICAL EQUIPMENT 

3 UNDER MEDICARE WITH RESPECT TO 

4 SPEECH GENERATING DEVICES. 

5 Section 1834(a)(2)(A)(iv) of the Social Security Act 

6 (42 U.S.C. 1395m(a)(2)(A)(iv)) is amended by striking 

7 ‘‘and before October 1, 2018,’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK30NT082PROD with BILLS
§ 133.10 Notice to manufacturers, packers, and distributors of pasteurized blended cheese, pasteurized process cheese, cheese food, cheese spread, and related foods. ( a ) Definitions and standards of identity have recently been promulgated under the authority of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act for a number of foods made in part from cheese, including pasteurized process cheese; pasteurized process cheese with fruits, vegetables, or meats; pasteurized blended cheese; pasteurized process cheese food; pasteurized process cheese spread, and related foods. These standards prescribe the name for each such food. The act requires that this name appear on the label. Many of these names consist of several words. In the past it has been the practice of some manufacturers to subordinate the words “pasteurized,” “blended,” “process,” “food,” and “spread” to give undue prominence to the word “cheese” and to words naming the variety of cheese involved.
( b ) When placing the names of these foods on labels so as to comply with the requirements of section 403 (a), (f), and (g) of the act, all the words forming the name specified by a definition and standard of identity should be given equal prominence. This can readily be accomplished by printing the specified name of the food in letters of the same size, color, and style of type, and with the same background.
( c ) Where the names of optional ingredients are required to appear on the label, the designations of all such ingredients should be given equal prominence. The names of the optional ingredients should appear prominently and conspicuously but should not be displayed with greater prominence than the name of the food. The word “contains” may precede the names of the optional ingredients, and when so used will not be considered as intervening printed matter between name of food and name of optional ingredients required to be placed on the label.
( d ) Where a manufacturer elects to include a label statement of fat and moisture content, the declaration should be on the basis of the food as marketed. A fat declaration on a moisture-free basis is likely to be misleading, and should not be used in labeling.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 3 (Wednesday, January 5, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 619]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-33275]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>12429 and <greek-i>12430]


Vermont Disaster <greek-i>VT-00015

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Vermont (FEMA-
1951-DR), dated 12/22/2010.
    Incident: Severe Storm.
    Incident Period: 12/01/2010 through 12/05/2010.
    Effective Date: 12/22/2010.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 02/21/2011.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 09/22/2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 12/22/2010, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:
    Primary Counties: Chittenden, Franklin, Lamoille.
    The Interest Rates are:
    For Physical Damage:
    Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere: 3.250.
    Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere: 3.000.
    For Economic Injury:
    Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere: 3.000.
    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 12429B 
and for economic injury is 12430B.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-33275 Filed 1-4-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                   JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                     MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             1,073,956
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        781,706
<ALLOWANCES>                                         (12,500)
<INVENTORY>                                        1,334,190
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   3,189,567
<PP&E>                                             1,683,253
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (1,518,701)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     3,354,119
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              1,058,260
<BONDS>                                               15,270
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                        3,713,721
<COMMON>                                             350,356
<OTHER-SE>                                        (1,783,488)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       3,354,119
<SALES>                                            1,259,703
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   1,259,703
<CGS>                                                619,251
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        619,251
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     538,494
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    (2,329)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      104,287
<INCOME-TAX>                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  104,287
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                         104,287
<EPS-BASIC>                                             0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0.00



</TABLE>
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 898 

Directing the Secretary of Homeland Security to transmit certain documents 

to the House of Representatives relating to Department of Homeland 

Security policies and activities relating to homeland security information 

produced and disseminated regarding cybersecurity threats posed by the 

ZTE Corporation, headquartered in Shenzhen, China. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 16, 2018 

Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 

RESOLUTION 

Directing the Secretary of Homeland Security to transmit 

certain documents to the House of Representatives relating to Department of Homeland Security policies and 

activities relating to homeland security information produced and disseminated regarding cybersecurity threats 

posed by the ZTE Corporation, headquartered in 

Shenzhen, China. 

1 Resolved, That not later than 14 days after the date 

2 of the adoption of this resolution, the Secretary of Home3 land Security is directed to transmit to the House of Rep4 resentatives, to the extent that such homeland security in5 formation is in the possession of the Secretary, copies of 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 898 IH 

1 any document, record, memo, correspondence, or other 

2 communication of the Department of Homeland Security 

3 or any portion of any such communication, that refers or 

4 relates to the following: 

5 (1) Any documentation related to the use of 

6 any ZTE Corporation’s products by the Department 

7 of Homeland Security. 

8 (2) Any documentation related to cybersecurity 

9 threats or vulnerabilities resulting from the use of 

10 ZTE Corporation’s products by the Department of 

11 Homeland Security or the Department’s contractors. 

12 (3) Any documentation related to the cyberse13 curity threats or vulnerabilities resulting from the 

14 use of ZTE Corporation’s products by State and 

15 local governments and first responders. 

16 (4) Any documentation related to any alerts or 

17 warnings issued by the Department of Homeland 

18 Security related to the use of ZTE Corporation’s cy19 bersecurity products. 

20 (5) Any documentation related to cybersecurity 

21 threats or vulnerabilities posed by the use of ZTE 

22 Corporation products by the Federal Government. 

23 (6) Any documentation related to cybersecurity 

24 threats or vulnerabilities from state actors, including 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 898 IH 

1 Iran, or terrorist organizations resulting from ZTE 

2 Corporation’s activities. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CP CLARE
CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS, AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE
SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-K FOR
FISCAL YEAR ENDING MARCH 31, 1997.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          37,430
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,412
<ALLOWANCES>                                       675
<INVENTORY>                                     20,116
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                78,790
<PP&E>                                          28,976
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 111,170
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,565
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            92
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   111,170
<SALES>                                        128,161
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                           85,603
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   49,123
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     8
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 452
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,447)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,464
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,911)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,911)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.77)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 20-1166

___________________________

Victoria L. Haynes, also known as Victoria L. Bass

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Benton N. Bass

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Arkansas - Hot Springs

 ____________

 Submitted: November 3, 2020

Filed: November 6, 2020

[Unpublished]

____________

Before BENTON, WOLLMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Victoria Haynes appeals following the district court’s1 adverse grant of

summary judgment in her diversity action against her ex-husband, Benton Bass. 

1The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the

Western District of Arkansas, now retired.
Upon de novo review, see Barse v. United States, 957 F.3d 883, 885 (8th Cir. 2020)

(standard of review), we agree with the district court that it lacked subject matter

jurisdiction, as the fraud claim was inextricably intertwined with the parties’ divorce

action. See Kahn v. Kahn, 21 F.3d 859, 861-62 (8th Cir. 1994) (under domestic

relations exception, federal court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to hear tort claims

inextricably intertwined with property settlement incident to divorce proceeding). We

find no error in the denial of Haynes’s motion for leave to amend the complaint, as

the court lacked jurisdiction over her proposed amended complaint for the same

reasons. See Reuter v. Jax Ltd., Inc., 711 F.3d 918, 921 (8th Cir. 2013) (denial of

leave to amend is reviewed for abuse of discretion and question of futility is reviewed

de novo). However, we modify the dismissal of the action to be without prejudice. 

See Cty. of Mille Lacs v. Benjamin, 361 F.3d 460, 464-65 (8th Cir. 2004). We also

deny Haynes’s appellate motion to disqualify Bass’s counsel. See Awnings v.

Fullerton, 912 F.3d 1089, 1096 (8th Cir. 2019).

The judgment is affirmed as modified. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 

______________________________

-2-
#### Robert Garrett, Petitioner, v North Babylon Volunteer Fire Company, Inc., Respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent which, after a hearing, found petitioner guilty of violating article 3 (§ 2, par g) of respondent’s by-laws, suspended him for a period of 30 days and reduced his rank from first lieutenant to fireman. Petition granted to the extent that the determination is annulled, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to respondent for a new hearing in accordance herewith. “The hearing held by an administrative tribunal acting in a judicial or quasi-judicial capacity may be more or less informal. Technical legal rules of evidence and procedure may be disregarded. Nevertheless, no essential element of a fair trial can be dispensed with unless waived. That means, among other things, that the party whose rights are being determined must be fully apprised of the claims of the opposing party and of the evidence to be considered, and must be given the opportunity to cross-examine witnesses, to inspect documents and to offer evidence in explanation or rebuttal” *(Matter of Hecht v Monaghan,*307 NY 461, 470; see, also, General Municipal Law, § 209-1). In the instant case, the respondent failed to advise petitioner of his right to appear at the hearing with counsel (cf. *Matter of Rapacki v Board of Fire Comrs. of Uniondale Fire Dist.,*75 AD2d 817), despite the fact that the respondent had counsel present to advise it throughout the hearing. In addition, the respondent failed to accord petitioner the opportunity to cross-examine the complainant and refused to permit him to remain in the hearing room during the testimony of the four firemen charged along with him (see *Matter of Hecht v Monaghan, supra).*Under these circumstances, the hearing cannot be considered fair in any meaningful sense of that word, or to have been in accord with petitioner’s fundamental due process rights. Hopkins, J. P., Mangano, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
§ 416.1 Special Procurement Provisions. ( a ) In order to ensure objective contractor performance and eliminate unfair competitive advantage, a prospective contractor that develops or drafts specifications, requirements, statements of work, invitations for bids, request for proposals, contract term and conditions or other documents for use by a State in conducting a procurement under the USDA entitlement programs specified in 2 CFR 200.101(f)(4) through (6) shall be excluded from competing for such procurements. Such prospective contractors are ineligible for contract awards resulting from such procurements regardless of the procurement method used. However, prospective contractors may provide States with specification information related to a State procurement under the USDA entitlement programs specified in 2 CFR 200.101(f)(4) through (6) and still compete for the procurement if the State, and not the prospective contractor, develops or drafts the specifications, requirements, statements of work, invitations for bid, and/or requests for proposals used to conduct the procurement.
( b ) Procurements by States under USDA entitlement programs specified in 2 CFR 200.101(f)(4) through (6) shall be conducted in a manner that prohibits the use of statutorily or administratively imposed in-State or local geographic preferences except as provided for in 2 CFR 200.319(c).
[79 FR 75985, Dec. 19, 2014, as amended at 85 FR 72912, Nov. 16, 2020]
#### § 1200.332 What methods must I use to pass requirements down to participants at lower tiers with whom I intend to do business?

You as a participant must include a term or condition in lower-tier transactions requiring lower-tier participants to comply with subpart C of the OMB guidance in 2 CFR part 180, as supplemented by this subpart.