alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE>

  First Health Group Corp. and Subsidiaries                EXHIBIT 11
  COMPUTATION OF BASIC EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
  (Unaudited)

                                                Three Months Ended March 31,
                                                ----------------------------
                                                     1999          1998
                                                  ----------    ----------
  <S>                                            <C>           <C>
  Net income .............................       $17,580,000   $23,103,000
                                                  ==========    ==========
  Weighted average number of common shares
    outstanding:

    Shares outstanding from beginning of period   53,463,000    63,890,000

    Other issuances of common stock ......            40,000       486,000

    Purchases of treasury stock ..........          (751,000)     (666,000)
                                                  ----------    ----------
  Weighted average common and common share
    equivalents...........................        52,752,000    63,710,000
                                                  ==========    ==========

  Net income  per common share............       $       .33   $       .36
                                                  ==========    ==========
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>

  First Health Group Corp. and Subsidiaries                EXHIBIT 11
  COMPUTATION OF DILUTED EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
  (Unaudited)

                                                Three Months Ended March 31,
                                                ----------------------------
                                                     1999         1998     
                                                  ----------    ----------
  <S>                                            <C>           <C> 
  Net income .............................       $17,580,000   $23,103,000
                                                  ==========    ==========
  Weighted average number of common shares
    outstanding:

    Shares outstanding from beginning of period   53,463,000    63,890,000

    Other issuances of common stock ......            40,000       486,000

    Purchases of treasury stock ..........          (751,000)     (666,000)

    Common Stock Equivalents:

    Additional equivalent shares issuable from
      assumed exercise of common stock options       356,000     1,174,000
                                                  ----------    ----------

  Weighted average common and common share
    equivalents...........................        53,108,000    64,884,000
                                                  ==========    ==========

  Net income per common share.............       $       .33   $       .36
                                                  ==========    ==========
</TABLE>
223 So.2d 869

#### W. S. YOUNG CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Inc. v. Dr. Martin O. MILLER.

No. 49906.

June 27, 1969.

In re: Dr. Martin O. Miller applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans.

The application is denied. According to the facts of this case, as found to be by the Court of Appeal, there appears no error of law in the judgment complained of.
Editorial Note on Part 173
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 173 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; and 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 173.40 Molecular sieve resins. Molecular sieve resins may be safely used in the processing of food under the following prescribed conditions: ( a ) The molecular sieve resins consist of purified dextran having an average molecular weight of 40,000, cross-linked with epichlorohydrin in a ratio of 1 part of dextran to 10 parts of epichlorohydrin, to give a stable three dimensional structure. The resins have a pore size of 2.0 to 3.0 milliliters per gram of dry resin (expressed in terms of water regain), and a particle size of 10 to 300 microns.
( b ) The molecular sieve resins are thoroughly washed with potable water prior to their first use in contact with food.
( c ) Molecular sieve resins are used as the gel filtration media in the final purification of partially delactosed whey. The gel bed shall be maintained in a sanitary manner in accordance with good manufacturing practice so as to prevent microbial build-up on the bed and adulteration of the product.
Sanitized

Patent
1

Schaeffer, John

From: Brooks, David

Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 11:59 AM

To: Schaeffer, John

Cc: Barone, Stan

Subject: HPV3 Data Adequacy Review for CASRN 68610-90-2 (CBI)

Hi John, 

I have posted a data adequacy review for CASRN 68610-90-2 on EPA’s CBI LAN at the following location: 

G:\Test Rules\ 

The file name is: 

68610-90-2_HPV3_DA_Acute_GeneMutation_Chromosomal Aberrations_07232015FINAL in both Word and Pdf format 

The studies submitted for acute mammalian toxicity, gene mutation, and chromosomal aberrations endpoints are 

adequate to satisfy the HPV3 test rule requirements D, E1, and E2. 

Please let me know if you have any questions. 

Dave 

David Brooks 

Environmental Protection Agency 

OCSPP/RAD (Mail Code 7403M) 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW 

Washington, DC 22046 

Phone: 202-564-8603 

Room: East Tower, 6209E
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

Ma y 1 3 , 2016 

# Order

Clerk Ma y 1 3 , 2016

151719 ( 60 )

DANIEL KEMP,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

SC: 151719

v COA: 319796

Wayne CC: 13

- 008264

- NF

FARM BUREAU GENERAL INSURANCE

COMPANY OF MICHIGAN,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_____________________________________/

On order of the C hief Justice

, the motion of amicus curiae Coalition Protecting

Auto No

- Fault to extend the time for fil ing an amicus brief is GRANTED. The amicus

brief will be accepted for filing if submitted on or before June 3 , 2016.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 001029817
<NAME> HEALTHFIRST MEDICAL GROUP, P.C.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                               1
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    43
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      43
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               42
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        43
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,262
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,275
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   497
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   484
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 305
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    258
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                258
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       258
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 2,804.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 2,804.35
        

</TABLE>
**ANNUAL COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

**For the period of January1, 2019 through December 31, 2019 (“****Reporting Period****”)**

 

 

Re:        Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, COMM 2013-CCRE7 CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates (the “Transaction”), issued pursuantto the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 1, 2013 (the “Poolingand Servicing Agreement”), by and among Deutsche Mortgage & Asset ReceivingCorporation, as Depositor, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank,National Association, as Master Servicer, Situs Holdings, LLC, as SpecialServicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee, CertificateAdministrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and Park Bridge Lender Services,LLC, as Operating Advisor

 

Capitalized terms used but notdefined herein have the meanings set forth in the Pooling and ServicingAgreement.

 

 

Situs Holdings, LLC, asSpecial Servicer, (a “Certifying Servicer”) is responsible for assessingcompliance as of December 31, 2019 for the Reporting Period with the applicableservicing criteria specified in Paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of the U.S.Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB (the “Relevant ServicingCriteria”).

 

The Special Servicer hasassessed its compliance with the Relevant Servicing Criteria for the ReportingPeriod and has concluded that the Special Servicer has complied, in allmaterial respects, with the Relevant Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2019and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform taken as a whole. 

 

As Executive Managing Directorand Vice President of Compliance of Situs Holdings, LLC, we certify that:

 

(A)    Areview of the Special Servicer’s activities during the Reporting Period and ofSitus Holdings, LLC’s performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement hasbeen made under our supervision; and

 

(B)    Tothe best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer hasfulfilled all its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement in allmaterial respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

 

 

Date: February 20, 2020

 

Situs Holdings, LLC

 

By: /s/ George Wisniewski

George Wisniewski

Executive Managing Director

 

By: /s/ Stacey Ciarlanti

Stacey Ciarlanti

Vice President, Compliance
#### Cludie S. BLOUNT, Appellant, v. Togo D. WEST, Jr., Acting Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Appellee.

No. 97-947.

United States Court of Veterans Appeals.

Feb. 3, 1998.

Before NEBEKER, Chief Judge, and STEINBERG and GREENE, Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

The appellant, Cludie S. Blount, the 98-year-old widow of World War I veteran John A. Blount, appeals, through counsel, a February 20, 1997, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board). On January 26, 1998, the appellant filed out-of-time an *38unopposed motion to supplement out-of-time the record on appeal (ROA) with the reverse side of Veterans’ Administration (now Department of Veterans Affairs) (VA) Form 21-8332a-2 (which sets forth a Notice of Procedural and Appellate rights), dated January 2, 1979, the front side of which is presently contained in the ROA. Record (R.) at 50.

This Court is precluded by statute from including in the ROA any material that was not contained in the “record of proceedings before the Secretary and the Board.” 38 U.S.C. § 7252(b); *see Rogozinski v. Derwinski,*1 Vet.App. 19 (1990) (review in Court shall be on record of proceedings before Secretary and Board). Where “relevant” documents relating to an appellant’s claim were within the Secretary’s control (for example, records generated by VA or communications received by it) prior to the BVA decision on appeal and could reasonably have been expected to be part of the record before the Secretary and the Board, such documents are “in contemplation of law” constructively part of the record of those proceedings. *Simington v. Brown,*9 Vet.App. 334, 335 (1996) (per curiam order) (quoting *Bell v. Derwinski,*2 Vet.App. 611, 612-13 (1992) (per curiam order)); *see also Hulsey v. Principi,*3 Vet.App. 486, 487 (1992) (per curiam order).

On consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that the appellant’s motion to supplement the record with the reverse side of VA Form 21-8332a-2 is granted. The Clerk of the Court will designate that one page as R. at 50A and attach it to the ROA.
###### Editorial Note on Part 172

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 172 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; 70 FR 72074, Dec. 1, 2005; and 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

#### § 172.180 Stannous chloride.

The food additive stannous chloride may be safely used for color retention in asparagus packed in glass, with lids lined with an inert material, in an amount not to exceed 20 parts per million calculated as tin (Sn).
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7139 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7139

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to change certain eligibility 
 provisions for loan forgiveness for teachers, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 30, 2024

  Mrs. Hayes introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to change certain eligibility 
 provisions for loan forgiveness for teachers, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Teacher Debt Relief Act''.

SEC. 2. LOAN FORGIVENESS FOR TEACHERS.

    The Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.) is 
amended--
            (1) in section 428J(g)(2) (20 U.S.C. 1078-10(g)(2))--
                    (A) in subparagraph (A), by inserting ``or'' after 
                the semicolon at the end;
                    (B) by striking subparagraph (B); and
                    (C) by redesignating subparagraph (C) as 
                subparagraph (B);
            (2) in section 455(m) (20 U.S.C. 1087e(m)), in paragraph 
        (4), by striking ``both this subsection and section 428J, 428K, 
        428L, or 460'' and inserting ``both this subsection and section 
        428K or 428L''; and
            (3) in section 460(g)(2) (20 U.S.C. 1087j(g)(2))--
                    (A) in subparagraph (A), by inserting ``or'' after 
                the semicolon at the end;
                    (B) by striking subparagraph (B); and
                    (C) by redesignating subparagraph (C) as 
                subparagraph (B).
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Dennis Antron GRANT, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 05-6742.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 21, 2005.

Decided Oct. 18, 2005.

*267Dennis Antron Grant, Appellant Pro Se. Jacabed Rodriguez Cross, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, Chan Park, Office of the United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Dennis Antron Grant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his petition for a certifícate of appealability pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (2000). We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

When the United States or its officer or agency is a party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than sixty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order, Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” *Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of Corr.,*434 U.S. 257, 264, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978) (quoting *United States v. Robinson,*361 U.S. 220, 229, 80 S.Ct. 282, 4 L.Ed.2d 259 (1960)).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on December 8, 2004. The notice of appeal was filed on April 29, 2005.* Because Grant failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*

*

 For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 4(c); *Houston v. Lack,*487 U.S. 266, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988).
H. Res. 95

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

February 16, 2005.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order

to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 310) to increase the

penalties for violations by television and radio broadcasters of

the prohibitions against transmission of obscene, indecent,

and profane material, and for other purposes. The bill shall

be considered as read. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and on any amendment thereto

to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one

hour of debate on the bill equally divided and controlled by

the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee

on Energy and Commerce; (2) an amendment printed in the

report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, if offered by Representative Upton of Michigan or his

designee, which shall be in order without intervention of any

point of order or demand for division of the question, shall

be considered as read, and shall be separately debatable for

20 minutes equally divided and controlled by the proponent
2

•HRES 95 EH

and an opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit with or

without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
38419.

#### ALLEN v. A. A. A. FINANCE COMPANY.

Decided September 12, 1960.

*Atkins & Atkins, Ben S. Atkins, Dorothy D. Atkins,*for plaintiff in error.

*Arnold S. Kaye,*contra.

Bell, Judge.

This appeal is brought before final disposition of the cause by a direct bill of exceptions based solely upon error assigned on the sustaining of a general demurrer to the answer and cross-action and their dismissal. No motion to dismiss the bill of exceptions was made by the defendant in error.

'A judgment sustaining a plaintiff’s demurrer to an answer and cross-action filed by a defendant can not be reviewed by a direct bill of exceptions before the final disposition of the case in the court below. Since this cause has not terminated finally in the trial court, it is before us prematurely. Accordingly, this court will dismiss the writ of error. Ga. L. 1957, pp. 224-230 *(Code Ann.*§ 6-701); *Dove v. Maxwell,*184 Ga. 460 (191 S. E. 916); *Bowman v. Poole,*212 Ga. 697 (95 S. E. 2d 375).

*Writ of error dismissed.*

*Felton, C. J., and Nichols, J., concur.*
#### § 1312.02 Definitions.

Any term contained in this part shall have the definition set forth in section 102 of the Act (21 U.S.C. 802) or part 1300 of this chapter.

[62 FR 13969, Mar. 24, 1997]
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of National Medical Health Card Systems,Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending September 30, 2005 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, James F. Smith, President and Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.

 

 

 
| /s/ James  F. Smith                                                  |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| James F.  Smith                                                      |
| President  and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
| September 15,  2006                                             |

 

This certification accompaniesthis Report on Form 10-Q/A pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filedby the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such certification will not be deemed tobe incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933,as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Companyspecifically incorporates it by reference.

 

----