alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1
                                                                    ------------



                                  CERTIFICATION

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES
                                      CODE)

         Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each
of the undersigned officers of NATIONAL DATACOMPUTER, a DELAWARE corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

         The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002
(the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained
in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


August 14, 2002                     /s/ John P. Ward
                                    -------------------------------
                                    JOHN P. WARD
                                    Chairman of the Board, President and
                                    Chief Executive Officer (principal executive
                                    officer)



August 14, 2002                     /s/ Gerald S. Eilberg
                                    --------------------------------
                                    GERALD S. EILBERG
                                    Chief Financial Officer (principal financial
                                    and accounting officer)



         The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed
as a separate disclosure document.


                                    /s/ Janice W. Diehsner
                                    --------------------------------
                                    Janice W. Diehsner
                                    Notory Public
                                    Comm. Expires 7/29/05
Attachment 3 Chemicals Classified as "Solids in Sdution" on EPCRA 302 List with a Vapor Pressure Equal to or Lower than Paraquat Dichloride

a EPA (1 987) Technical Guidance for Hazards Analysis: Emergency Planning for Extremely Hazardous Substances, Report prepared by EPA, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, and the U.S. Department of Transportation, PB93-20691 0
b If there are two numbers, the first applied to the compound in its liquid form, and the second applies to the solid form. Chemical Name 

### Paraquat dichloride Paraquat methosulfate 

### Arsenous oxide Azinphos-methyl Chloroxuron 

### Boiling Point l0C)

## " None None 46S°C

ppp 4OO0C 

### None None 450°C 440°C None
443OC Vapor Pressure (rr 1

### x 

## lo-' 1 x 

### 1 x 

### 1 

### x 

## lo-7 1x 

### lo-7 TPQ 

### pound^)^ 10 1 

### 10,000 10 1 10,000 

### 100 1 

### 10,000 10110,000 500 1 

### 10.OW 100 1 

### 10,000 10 110,000 500 1 

### 10,000 100 1 

### 10,000
100/ 10,000 

### Piprotal Strychnine Strychnine, Sulfate Thallous ch

### toride Thallous sulfate Triamiphos
Vanadium pentoide Zinc phosphide Coumaphos Fenamiphos Formetanate hydrochloride Phenol, 2,Z-Thiobis(4,6- Dichloro) Phenol, 

### 2,2'-Thiobis(4- Chloro-6Methyl) - 

### Use herbicide herbicide weed killer insecticide selective herbicide; pesticide 

### insecticide insectrcide; nernatocide insecticide; acaricide antimicrobial 

### agent against bacteria, mold,yeast; 

### proposed

### as fungicide could not determine 

### uses
100 1 

### 10,000 100 1 

### 10,000 100 110,000 100 110,000 100 / 

### 10,000 500 / 

### 10,000
loo 10'000



### 500 I



### x 1x 

## lom7 1 x 

## lom7
1 x 10‘~


### 1 x 

## lo-' synergist for pyrethrum and 

### carbamate insecticides rodenticide rodenticide catalyst in chlorinations Rat poison; ant bait; reagent fungicide catalyst 

### in oxidation 

### of SOz

### to SOs; 

### manuf. 

### of yellow glass; depolarizer; 

### developer in photography rat and 

### field 

### mice poison preparations 1x 

### 10‘~ 1x 

## lo4 1x 

## lo4 1 x 

### 1x 

### 10‘~ 1 x 

## lo-?
1x 1u7


### I



### x 

## lo-7 463% 

### 460°C none 720°C none 4OO0C
I 750°C

1 

### I 

## ooOc
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7780

CHRISTOPHER H. WRIGHT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus R. D. FOWLER, Officer; TOBY MATTHEWS, Sheriff; DOCTOR STOKES, Henrico County Jail Medical; HENRICO COUNTY JAIL MEDICAL DEPARTMENT, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge. (CA-96-730) Submitted: August 25, 1998 Decided: September 17, 1998 Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Christopher H. Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Paul Rapisarda, Jr., County Attorney, James Thomas Moore, III, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Richmond, Virginia; Anton Joseph Stelly, THOMPSON, SMITHERS, NEWMAN & WADE, Richmond, Virginia; Carlyle Randolph Wimbish, III, Marvin Pierce Rucker, SANDS, ANDERSON, MARKS & MILLER, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.* The parties consented to the exercise of jurisdiction by a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(c) (West 1993). 2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the magistrate judge’s order * denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Wright v. Fowler , No. CA-96-730 (E.D. Va. Nov. 4, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****The emerging digital economy**
 
1998
1999:Report | Appendix
 
SuDoc Number:C 1.96:
Item Number:0128-T (online)
CGP systemNumber:000563371
 
November 19, 2018
§ 1.1159 How will FDA oversee LAAF-accredited laboratories? ( a ) FDA may review the performance of LAAF-accredited laboratories at any time to determine whether the LAAF-accredited laboratory continues to comply with the applicable requirements of this subpart and whether there are deficiencies in the performance of the LAAF-accredited laboratory that, if not corrected, would warrant corrective action, probation, or disqualification under § 1.1161.
( b ) In evaluating the performance of a LAAF-accredited laboratory, FDA may review any of the following: ( 1 ) Records the LAAF-accredited laboratory is required to maintain under this subpart;
( 2 ) Records the recognized accreditation body that LAAF-accredited the laboratory is required to maintain under this subpart;
( 3 ) Information obtained by FDA during a review of the LAAF-accredited laboratory conducted pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section;
( 4 ) Information obtained by FDA during an evaluation of the recognized accreditation body that LAAF-accredits the laboratory;
( 5 ) Analytical reports and test results submitted to FDA; and
( 6 ) Any other information obtained by FDA, including during FDA's inspections or investigations of one or more owners or consignees.
( c ) FDA may conduct an onsite review of a LAAF-accredited laboratory at any reasonable time, with or without a recognized accreditation body (or its officers, employees, and other agents) present, to review the performance of a LAAF-accredited laboratory under this subpart. Certain review activities may be conducted remotely if it will not aid in the review to conduct them onsite.
( d ) FDA may report any observations and deficiencies identified during its review of LAAF-accredited laboratory performance under this subpart to the recognized accreditation body.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that briefing and planning meetings of the Vermont Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 10 a.m. on Monday, January 3, 2011, at the State House, Room 11, 115 State Street, Montpelier, Vermont 05633. The purpose of the briefing meeting is for the committee to hear presentations from public officials and community groups on the status of recommendations made by the Advisory Committee in its August 2009 racial profiling report. After the briefing meeting, the Committee will hold its planning meeting to plan future activities.

                    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments; the comments must be received in the regional office by February 3, 2011. The address is the Eastern Regional Office, 624 9th Street, NW., Suite 740, Washington, DC 20425. Persons wishing to e-mail their comments, or who desire additional information should contact the Eastern Regional Office at 202-376-7533 or by e-mail to:                     *ero@usccr.gov.*

Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meetings and require the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the meetings.

                    Records generated from these meetings may be inspected and reproduced at the Eastern Regional Office, as they become available, both before and after the meetings. Persons interested in the work of this advisory committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site,                     *http://www.usccr.gov,*                     or to contact the Eastern Regional Office at the above e-mail or street address.                

The meetings will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

Dated in Washington, DC on December 29, 2010.

Peter Minarik,

Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.

[FR Doc. 2010-33176 Filed 1-3-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
Editorial Note on Part 109
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 109 appear at 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 109.4 Establishment of tolerances, regulatory limits, and action levels. ( a ) When appropriate under the criteria of § 109.6, a tolerance for an added poisonous or deleterious substance, which may be a food additive, may be established by regulation in subpart B of this part under the provisions of section 406 of the act. A tolerance may prohibit any detectable amount of the substance in food.
( b ) When appropriate under the criteria of § 109.6, and under section 402(a)(1) of the act, a regulatory limit for an added poisonous or deleterious substance, which may be a food additive, may be established by regulation in subpart C of this part under the provisions of sections 402(a)(1) and 701(a) of the act. A regulatory limit may prohibit any detectable amount of the substance in food. The regulatory limit established represents the level at which food is adulterated within the meaning of section 402(a)(1) of the act.
( c ) ( 1 ) When appropriate under the criteria of § 109.6, an action level for an added poisonous or deleterious substance, which may be a food additive, may be established to define a level of contamination at which a food may be regarded as adulterated.
( 2 ) Whenever an action level is established or changed, a notice shall be published in the Federal Register as soon as practicable thereafter. The notice shall call attention to the material supporting the action level which shall be on file with the Dockets Management Staff before the notice is published. The notice shall invite public comment on the action level.
( d ) A regulation may be established in subpart D of this part to identify a food containing a naturally occurring poisonous or deleterious substance which will be deemed to be adulterated under section 402(a)(1) of the act. These regulations do not constitute a complete list of such foods.
[42 FR 52819, Sept. 30, 1977, as amended at 55 FR 20785, May 21, 1990; 88 FR 45065, July 14, 2023]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22 - 0351 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ISAAC WILLIAM MACY,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including May 8 , 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 29 2023

03/29/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0351
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 875 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 875

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     September 6, 2006.
Whereas Spelman College was established by Sophia B. Packard and Harriet E. 
        Giles, school teachers and Baptist missionaries, in 1881 in Atlanta, 
        Georgia, for the purpose of educating African American women and girls;
Whereas as a result of the benevolence of John D. Rockefeller, Sr. and Laura 
        Spelman Rockefeller, the name of the institution was changed from 
        ``Atlanta Baptist Female Seminary'' to ``Spelman Seminary'' in honor of 
        the Spelman family;
Whereas the curriculum expanded to include high school and college classes, and 
        Spelman Seminary conferred its first high school diplomas in 1887, and 
        its first college degrees in 1901;
Whereas in 1924, Spelman Seminary officially became Spelman College and grew to 
        become a leading undergraduate institution for African American women;
Whereas Spelman College was ranked among the top 75 Best Liberal Arts Colleges 
        according to U.S. News & World Report, 2007 edition;
Whereas Spelman College is one of six institutions designated by the National 
        Science Foundation and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration 
        as a Model Institution for Excellence in undergraduate science and math 
        education;
Whereas the administration of Spelman College has initiated a strategic plan for 
        Spelman (``Spelman ALIVE'') that includes five goals: Academic 
        excellence, Leadership development, Improving the infrastructure, 
        Visibility of accomplishments of the campus community, and Exemplary 
        customer service, all designed to create a vision for Spelman of 
        ``Nothing Less than the Best''; and
Whereas Spelman College has prepared more than six generations of African 
        American women to reach the highest levels of academic, community, and 
        professional achievement: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives--
            (1) congratulates Spelman College on the occasion of its 125th 
        anniversary; and
            (2) commends the administration, faculty, staff, students, and 
        alumnae of Spelman College for their outstanding achievements, and 
        contributions to African American education, history, and culture.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### § 1309.52 Purpose of hearing.

If requested by a person entitled to a hearing, the Administrator shall hold a hearing for the purpose of receiving factual evidence regarding the issues involved in the denial, revocation, or suspension of any registration. Extensive argument should not be offered into evidence but rather presented in opening or closing statements of counsel or in memoranda or proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law.
#### § 1140.10 General responsibilities of manufacturers, distributors, and retailers.

Each manufacturer, distributor, importer, and retailer is responsible for ensuring that the cigarettes, smokeless tobacco, or covered tobacco products it manufactures, labels, advertises, packages, distributes, imports, sells, or otherwise holds for sale comply with all applicable requirements under this part.

[81 FR 29103, May 10, 2016]
#### § 1316.50 Appearance; representation; authorization.

Any person entitled to appear in a hearing may appear in person or by a representative in any proceeding or hearing and may be heard with respect to matters relevant to the issues under consideration. A representative must either be an employee of the person or an attorney at law who is a member of the bar, in good standing, of any State, territory, or the District of Columbia, and admitted to practice before the highest court of that jurisdiction. Any representative may be required by the Administrator or the presiding officer to present a notarized power of attorney showing his authority to act in such representative capacity and/or an affidavit or certificate of admission to practice.

[36 FR 7820, Apr. 24, 1971, as amended at 36 FR 13387, July 21, 1971. Redesignated at 38 FR 26609, Sept. 24, 1973]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 661 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 661

Encouraging States to establish programs to award high school diplomas 
to veterans who left high school before receiving diplomas in order to 
            serve in the Armed Forces during a time of war.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 31, 2006

   Mr. Pallone (for himself, Mrs. Jones of Ohio, Mr. Fitzpatrick of 
Pennsylvania, Mr. Salazar, Mr. Grijalva, Ms. Harris, Mrs. McCarthy, and 
    Mrs. Christensen) submitted the following resolution; which was 
        referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Encouraging States to establish programs to award high school diplomas 
to veterans who left high school before receiving diplomas in order to 
            serve in the Armed Forces during a time of war.

Whereas in October 2000, New Jersey established Operation Recognition, a program 
        to honor veterans of World War I, World War II, the Korean War, and the 
        Vietnam War who left high school in order to join the Armed Forces and 
        never received high school diplomas;
Whereas through Operation Recognition the State of New Jersey will award a high 
        school diploma to any veteran residing in New Jersey who left a high 
        school located in New Jersey before graduating to enter the Armed Forces 
        during World War I, World War II, the Korean War, or the Vietnam War; 
        and
Whereas New York, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Massachusetts, Minnesota, 
        Nebraska, North Carolina, Wisconsin, and West Virginia have established 
        programs similar to Operation Recognition: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives encourages each State 
to establish a program similar to Operation Recognition, to award high 
school diplomas to veterans who left high school in order to serve in 
the Armed Forces during a time of war and who never received high 
school diplomas.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION OF THE
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. C.
SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO


SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the
Quarterly Report of SigmaBroadband Co., (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Timothy D. Valley, President and Principal Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1) 	The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) 	The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.











SIGMABROADBAND CO.





June 7, 2016





By: /s/ Timothy D. Valley


Timothy D. Valley


Chief Financial Officer and


Principal Accounting Officer
```

[108th Congress Public Law 258]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ258.108]

[[Page 118 STAT. 692]]

Public Law 108-258
108th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 7 Commercial Boulevard in Middletown, Rhode Island, as the ``Rhode 
 Island Veterans Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: June 25, 2004 -  [H.R. 
                                3942]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 7 
Commercial Boulevard in Middletown, Rhode Island, is hereby redesignated 
as the ``Rhode Island Veterans Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Rhode Island Veterans Post 
Office Building''.

    Approved June 25, 2004.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3942:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):
            Apr. 27, considered and passed House.
            June 9, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```