alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 146.120 Frozen concentrate for lemonade. ( a ) Frozen concentrate for lemonade is the frozen food prepared from one or both of the lemon juice ingredients specified in paragraph (b) of this section together with one or any mixture of safe and suitable nutritive carbohydrate sweeteners. The product contains not less than 48.0 percent by weight of soluble solids taken as the sucrose value determined by refractometer and corrected for acidity prescribed in “Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists,” 13th Ed. (1980), section 22.025, “Frozen Concentrate for Lemonade (12),” under the heading “Soluble Solids by Refractometer—Official First Action,” which is incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the AOAC INTERNATIONAL, 481 North Frederick Ave., suite 500, Gaithersburg, MD 20877, or may be examined at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html* When the product is diluted according to directions for making lemonade which shall appear on the label, the acidity of the lemonade, calculated as anhydrous citric acid, shall be not less than 0.70 gram per 100 milliliters, and the soluble solids, measured as described for the concentrate, shall be not less than 10.5 percent by weight.
( b ) The lemon juice ingredients referred to in paragraph (a) of this section are: ( 1 ) Lemon juice or frozen lemon juice or a mixture of these.
( 2 ) Concentrated lemon juice or frozen concentrated lemon juice or a mixture of these. For the purposes of this section, lemon juice is the undiluted juice expressed from mature lemons of an acid variety; and concentrated lemon juice is lemon juice from which part of the water has been removed. In the preparation of the lemon juice ingredients, the lemon oil content may be adjusted by the addition of lemon oil or concentrated lemon oil in accordance with good manufacturing practice, and the lemon pulp in the juice as expressed may be left in the juice or may be separated. Lemon pulp that has been separated, which may have been preserved by freezing, may be added in preparing frozen concentrate for lemonade, provided that the amount of pulp added does not raise the proportion of pulp in the finished food to a level in excess of that which would be present by using lemon juice ingredients from which pulp has not been separated. The lemon juice ingredients may be treated by heat, either before or after the other ingredients are added, to reduce the enzymatic activity and the number of viable microorganisms.
( c ) *Label declaration.* Each of the ingredients used in the food shall be declared on the label as required by the applicable sections of parts 101 and 130 of this chapter.
[42 FR 14433, Mar. 15, 1977, as amended at 47 FR 11830, Mar. 19, 1982; 49 FR 10100, Mar. 19, 1984; 54 FR 24895, June 12, 1989; 58 FR 2881, Jan. 6, 1993; 63 FR 14035, Mar. 24, 1998]
# EUR-Lex - 31992D0257 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31992D0257

**92/257/EEC: Commission Decision of 21 April 1992 amending Decision 87/119/EEC as regards the list of establishments in Brazil approved for the purpose of importing meat products into the Community **

*
Official Journal L 128 , 14/05/1992 P. 0030 - 0031 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 21 April 1992 amending Decision 87/119/EEC as regards the list of establishments in Brazil approved for the purpose of importing meat products into the Community (92/257/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 72/462/EEC of 12 December 1972 on health and veterinary inspection problems upon importation of bovine, ovine and caprine animals and swine, fresh meat or meat products from third countries (1), as last amended by Council Regulation (EEC) No 3763/91 (2), and in particular Article 4 (1) thereof,

Whereas a list of establishments in Brazil, approved for the purpose of importing meat products into the Community, was drawn up initially by Commission Decision 87/119/EEC (3), as last amended by Decision 88/18/EEC (4);

Whereas a Community on-the-spot visit to meat product establishments in Brazil has revealed that the level of hygiene in one establishment was altered since the last inspection;

Whereas the list of establishments should be amended accordingly;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Annex to Decision 87/119/EEC is hereby replaced by the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States. Done at Brussels, 21 April 1992. For the Commission

Ray MAC SHARRY

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 302, 31. 12. 1972, p. 28. (2) OJ No L 356, 24. 12. 1991, p. 1. (3) OJ No L 49, 18. 2. 1987, p. 37. (4) OJ No L 9, 13. 1. 1988, p. 14.

ANNEX

LIST OF ESTABLISHMENTS

Approval No Establishment Address SIF 7 Swift Armour SA Indústria e Comércio Santana do Livramento, Rio Grande do Sul SIF 10 Swift Armour SA Indústria e Comércio Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo SIF 34 Perdigao Agroindustrial SA S. André, Sao Paulo SIF 76 SA Frigorífico Anglo Barretos, Sao Paulo SIF 226 BE Comércio e Indústria Ltda Bagé, Rio Grande do Sul SIF 337 Frigorífico Bertin Ltda Lins, Sao Paulo SIF 381 Frigorífico Kaiowa SA Guarulhos, Sao Paulo SIF 385 Indústrias Mouran Ltda Andradina, Sao Paulo SIF 736 Sola SA Indústrias Alimentícias Três Rios, Rio de Janeiro SIF 1676 UA - Comércio e Indústria SA Uberlândia, Minas Gerais SIF 2015 Sadia Oeste SA Indústria e Comércio Várzea Grande, Mato Grosso
§ 417.935 Disqualified (USDA supplement to governmentwide definition at 2 CFR 180.935). “Disqualified” means that a person is prohibited from participating in specified Federal procurement or nonprocurement transactions as required under a statute, Executive order (other than Executive Orders 12549 and 12689) or other authority. Examples of disqualifications include persons prohibited under— ( a ) The Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 276(a));
( b ) The equal employment opportunity acts and Executive orders; or
( c ) The Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7606), Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1368) and Executive Order 11738 (3 CFR, 1973 Comp., p. 799);
( d ) 515(h) of the Federal Crop Insurance Act (7 U.S.C. 1515(h));
( e ) Section 12 of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 2021).
[84 FR 52996, Oct. 4, 2019]
§ 111.13 What supervisor requirements apply? ( a ) You must assign qualified personnel to supervise the manufacturing, packaging, labeling, or holding of dietary supplements.
( b ) Each supervisor whom you use must be qualified by education, training, or experience to supervise.
EXHIBIT  99.1

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                    As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                          Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Semele  Group Inc., a Delaware
corporation  (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as
filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  the  undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002  that:

(1)     the  Report  of  the  Partnership  filed  today  fully complies with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.

                    /s/  Gary  D.  Engle
                    --------------------
                    Gary  D.  Engle
                    Chief  Executive  Officer
                    August  19,  2002
# m8857.docx

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 23.05.2018 C(2018) 3289 final To the notifying party: Subject : Case M. 8857 - EDENRED / UTA 1 2 Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1 )( b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 and Article 57 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area Dear Sir or Madam, 1. On 24 April 2018 , the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which Edenred Tankkarten Holding GmbH, ultimately controlled by Edenred SA (" Edenred ", France) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1 )( b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Union Tank Eckstein GmbH & Co. KG (" UTA ", Germany) by way of purchase of shares . 3 2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are: - Edenred provides pre- and post-paid corporate services including employee benefits and mobility solutions; - UTA issues fuel cards used for cashless payment of fuel and other vehicle related services. 3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5 ( d ) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 . 4 4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1 )( b) of the Merger Regulation and Article 57 of the EEA Agreement . For the Commission (Signed) Johannes LAITENBERGER Director - General
(1)
OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ( the ' Merger Regulation ' ). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( ' TFEU ' ) has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of ' Community ' by ' Union ' and ' common market ' by ' internal market ' . The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.
(2) OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3 ( the ' EEA Agreement ' ).
(3) Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 157 , 04.05.2018 , p. 7 .
(4)
OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5 .
§ 780.2 Definitions. ( a ) *Act* means the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (Pub. L. 83-703; 42 U.S.C. 2011).
( b ) *Application* means the application filed by an applicant for a patent license, for the determination of a reasonable royalty fee, for an award, or for compensation under this part.
( c ) *Board* means the Patent Compensation Board.
( d ) *Chairman* means the Chairman of the Patent Compensation Board.
( e ) Department, or DOE, or Department of Energy means the Department of Energy, established by the Department of Energy Organization Act (Pub. L. 95-91; 42 U.S.C. 7101).
( f ) *Party* means the applicant, patent owner, Department representative, and any person admitted as a party by the Board for any proceeding under this part.
( g ) *Patent Owner* means the owner of record in the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
( h ) *Secretary* means the Secretary of the Department of Energy or the delegate of the Secretary of Energy.
Editorial Note on Part 112
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 112 appear at 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 112.144 What testing must I do during growing, harvesting, packing, and holding sprouts? All of the following testing must be done during growing, harvesting, packing, and holding sprouts: ( a ) You must test the growing, harvesting, packing, and holding environment for *Listeria* species or *L. monocytogenes* in accordance with the requirements of § 112.145.
( b ) You must either: ( 1 ) Test spent sprout irrigation water from each production batch of sprouts for *E. coli* O157:H7, *Salmonella* species, and any pathogens meeting the criteria in paragraph (c) of this section, in accordance with the requirements of § 112.147; or
( 2 ) If testing spent sprout irrigation water is not practicable (for example, soil-grown sprouts harvested with roots or for hydroponically grown sprouts that use very little water), test each production batch of sprouts at the in-process stage (*i.e.,* while sprouts are still growing) for *E. coli* O157:H7, *Salmonella* species, and any pathogens meeting the criteria in paragraph (c) of this section, in accordance with the requirements of § 112.147.
( c ) In addition to *E. coli* O157:H7 and *Salmonella* species, you must conduct tests as provided in paragraph (b) of this section for additional pathogens when the following conditions are met: ( 1 ) Testing for the pathogen is reasonably necessary to minimize the risk of serious adverse health consequences or death from use of, or exposure to, sprouts; and
( 2 ) A scientifically valid test method for the pathogen is available to detect the pathogen in spent sprout irrigation water (or sprouts).
Description of 2006 Senior Management Program



 Exhibit 10.4 
 Description of 2006 Senior Management Compensation Program 
 The 2006 Senior Management Incentive
Compensation Program (the “Program”) for Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (the “Company”), which is substantially identical to the 2005 senior management compensation program, establishes the criteria for 2006 incentive
compensation in the form of (i) an annual cash bonus and (ii) long-term incentive compensation in the form of restricted common stock grants with a three-year vesting period pursuant to the Company’s 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
Both components are based on attainment of Company (50%) and individual (50%) performance objectives. The Company’s performance objectives are weighted equally between the Company’s return on investment (as defined) and funds
from operations per share. 
 The threshold, target and maximum cash bonus (measured as a percentage of their respective annual base
salaries) under the Program for Robert A. Alter, Chief Executive Officer and President, Jon D. Kline, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Gary A. Stougaard, Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer, Andrew W. Gross,
Senior Vice President and General Counsel, were set in accordance with their respective employment agreements and range from 40% to 125% of base salary (50% to 75% for Mr. Gross). The threshold, target and maximum restricted stock grants
(measured as a percentage of their respective annual base salaries) under the Program range from 100% to 200% (50% to 100% for Mr Gross). Shares of restricted stock granted under the Program will be valued at the average trading price of the
Company’s common stock for the twenty consecutive trading days ending on the third trading day prior to the date of approval of the grant. The target cash bonus for William M. Wagner, Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer, was set
at 75% of his annual base salary. Mr. Wagner is also eligible to receive a restricted stock grant.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1132 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1132

 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to make permanent the 
   removal of the rental cap for durable medical equipment under the 
      Medicare program with respect to speech generating devices.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 16, 2017

 Mr. Cassidy (for himself, Ms. Klobuchar, and Mr. King) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to make permanent the 
   removal of the rental cap for durable medical equipment under the 
      Medicare program with respect to speech generating devices.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Steve Gleason Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. MAKING PERMANENT THE REMOVAL OF THE RENTAL CAP FOR DURABLE 
              MEDICAL EQUIPMENT UNDER MEDICARE WITH RESPECT TO SPEECH 
              GENERATING DEVICES.

    Section 1834(a)(2)(A)(iv) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395m(a)(2)(A)(iv)) is amended by striking ``and before October 1, 
2018,''.
                                 <all>
```
#### People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas Edward Land, Defendant-Appellant.

Gen. No. 11,085.

Fourth District.

September 22, 1969.

Robert E. Williams, of Bloomington, for appellant.

*346Paul R. Welch, State’s Attorney, of Bloomington, for appellee.

TRAPP, P. J.

Upon revocation of his probation, defendant was sentenced to serve not less than four years nor more than seven years upon a charge of burglary. He appeals from the sentence only.

The evidence in support of such revocation was that he had joined others in committing a subsequent burglary. He was then nineteen years of age. The excerpts from the record do not show that defendant testified during the revocation proceedings.

Defendant cites People v. Carroll, 76 Ill App2d 9, 221 NE2d 528, for the principle that an ideal sentence sufficiently punishes, adequately safeguards the public and rehabilitates the offender. This record shows that defendant had been offered rehabilitative processes since 1963 in youth camps and training schools for offenses of theft and auto theft. Granted probation for burglary in June, 1966, he resumed the practice of that art in January, 1967. Defendant cites the language of People v. Grigsby, 75 Ill App2d 184, 220 NE2d 498, as to unjust sentences. In that case the defendant was a first offender.

The record discloses that defendant is a recidivist and that he offered no evidence in mitigation. The trial court could reasonably conclude that the fourth try at rehabilitation required more than a minimal term. There is no such departure from the purpose and the spirit of the law as requires this court to alter the sentence. People v. Hicks, 35 Ill2d 390, 220 NE2d 461.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

SMITH and CRAVEN, JJ., concur.
STEAM ELECTRIC

C B I R E P L AC E M E NT P A G E

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 20 09

- 0819

DCN:

________________________________________

T H E FO LL OW ING H AS BEE N R E M O V E D BE CAUSE IT

C O N T AINS C O N F ID E N T IAL B USIN E SS IN FO RMA T I O N

(C B I) P E R 4 0 C F R P ART 2

, SU B P ART B

. SE 04 331A012
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                    PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I, Thomas M. Duff, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, that:

      (1)   The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter
            ended June 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the
            requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
            (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

August 9, 2004

                                    By: /s/ Thomas M. Duff
                                    --------------------------------
                                    Chief Executive Officer
### Ground water in the New Haven area, Connecticut

By: John Stafford Brown

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp540

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 5**                            (18463 pdf)                        
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Editorial Note on Part 131
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 131 appear at 63 FR 14035, Mar. 24, 1998.

§ 131.180 Half-and-half. ( a ) *Description.* Half-and-half is the food consisting of a mixture of milk and cream which contains not less than 10.5 percent but less than 18 percent milkfat. It is pasteurized or ultra-pasteurized, and may be homogenized.
( b ) *Optional ingredients.* The following safe and suitable optional ingredients may be used: ( 1 ) Emulsifiers.
( 2 ) Stabilizers.
( 3 ) Nutritive sweeteners.
( 4 ) Characterizing flavoring ingredients (with or without coloring) as follows: ( i ) Fruit and fruit juice (including concentrated fruit and fruit juice).
( ii ) Natural and artificial food flavoring.
( c ) *Methods of analysis.* The milkfat content is determined by the method prescribed in “Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists,” 13th Ed. (1980), in sections 16.156 and 16.059, under “Fat, Roese-Gottlieb Method—Official Final Action,” which is incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the AOAC INTERNATIONAL, 481 North Frederick Ave., suite 500, Gaithersburg, MD 20877, at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .*
( d ) *Nomenclature.* The name of the food is “Half-and-half”. The name of the food shall be accompanied on the label by a declaration indicating the presence of any characterizing flavoring, as specified in § 101.22 of this chapter. ( 1 ) The following terms shall accompany the name of the food wherever it appears on the principal display panel or panels of the label in letters not less than one-half the height of the letters used in such name: ( i ) The word “ultra-pasteurized” if the food has been ultra-pasteurized.
( ii ) The word “sweetened” if no characterizing flavor ingredients are used, but nutritive sweetener is added.
( 2 ) The following terms may appear on the label: ( i ) The word “pasteurized” if the food has been pasteurized.
( ii ) The word “homogenized” if the food has been homogenized.
( e ) *Label declaration.* Each of the ingredients used in the food shall be declared on the label as required by the applicable sections of parts 101 and 130 of this chapter.
[42 FR 14360, Mar. 15, 1977, as amended at 47 FR 11825, Mar. 19, 1982; 49 FR 10092, Mar. 19, 1984; 54 FR 24893, June 12, 1989; 58 FR 2891, Jan. 6, 1993]