Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 95 / Thursday, May 16, 2013 / Proposed Rules 28775 

More detailed information on these 

provisions can be found in the technical 

support document located in the docket 

prepared for this rulemaking action. 

IV. Proposed Action 

EPA is proposing to approve the State 

of Maryland SIP revision submitted on 

January 10, 2013, adopting the 

requirements as recommended by the 

MMPPC CTG and adopting the pleasure 

craft industry recommendations for the 

following four coating categories: Finish 

Primer/Surfacer; Antifouling Sealer/ 

Tiecoat; Other Substrate Antifoulant; 

and Extreme High Gloss. For these four 

categories, Maryland reviewed industry 

data and determined that for the 

purpose of functionality, cost, and VOC 

emissions, the alternative limits adopted 

for these four coating categories 

constitute RACT. EPA believes that 

Maryland’s approach is consistent with 

the guidance memorandum entitled, 

‘‘Control Technique Guidelines for 

Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic Part 

Coatings—Industry Request for 

Reconsideration,’’ and therefore, 

believes that these regulations reflect 

RACT. EPA concurs with MDE’s 

analysis in the SIP submittal that this 

regulation reflects RACT. EPA is 

soliciting public comments on the 

issues discussed in this document. 

These comments will be considered 

before taking final action. 

V. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely proposes to approve state law as 

meeting Federal requirements and does 

not impose additional requirements 

beyond those imposed by state law. For 

that reason, this proposed action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this proposed rule, 

pertaining to the State of Maryland’s 

amendments to regulations for the 

control of VOCs for MMPPC, does not 

have tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the state, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on tribal governments or preempt 

tribal law. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Ozone, Volatile organic compounds. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Dated: May 2, 2013. 

W.C. Early, 

Acting, Regional Administrator, Region III. 

[FR Doc. 2013–11789 Filed 5–15–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R04–OAR–2007–0602; FRL–9813–4] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; North Carolina; 

State Implementation Plan 

Miscellaneous Revisions 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve 

a portion of a revision to the North 

Carolina State Implementation Plan 

submitted on February 3, 2010, through 

the North Carolina Department of 

Environment and Natural Resources. 

This revision updates the North 

Carolina SIP to reflect EPA’s current 

national ambient air quality standards 

for ozone, lead and particulate matter 

found in the Code of Federal 

Regulations. In the Final Rules Section 

of this Federal Register, EPA is 

approving the State’s implementation 

plan revision as a direct final rule 

without prior proposal because the 

Agency views this as a noncontroversial 

submittal and anticipates no adverse 

comments. A detailed rationale for the 

approval is set forth in the direct final 

rule. If no adverse comments are 

received in response to this rule, no 

further activity is contemplated. If EPA 

receives adverse comments, the direct 

final rule will be withdrawn and all 

public comments received will be 

addressed in a subsequent final rule 

based on this proposed rule. EPA will 

not institute a second comment period 

on this document. Any parties 

interested in commenting on this 

document should do so at this time. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before June 17, 2013. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04– 

OAR–2007–0602 by one of the following 

methods: 

(a) www.regulations.gov: Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

(b) Email: R4-RDS@epa.gov. 

(c) Fax: (404) 562–9019. 

(d) Mail: EPA–R04–OAR–2007–0602, 

Regulatory Development Section, Air 

Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and 

Toxics Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. 

(e) Hand Delivery or Courier: Lynorae 

Benjamin, Chief, Regulatory 

Development Section, Air Planning 

Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics 

Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Such 

deliveries are only accepted during the 

Regional Office’s normal hours of 

operation. The Regional Office’s official 

hours of business are Monday through 

Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding federal 

holidays. 

Please see the direct final rule which 

is located in the Rules section of this 

Federal Register for detailed 

instructions on how to submit 

comments. 


erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
28776 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 95 / Thursday, May 16, 2013 / Proposed Rules 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

information regarding this source 

specific SIP revision, contact Ms. Kelly 

Sheckler, Air Quality Modeling and 

Transportation Section, Air Planning 

Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics 

Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Ms. 

Sheckler’s telephone number is (404) 

562–9222; email address: 

sheckler.kelly@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For 

additional information see the direct 

final rule which is published in the 

Rules Section of this Federal Register. 

A detailed rationale for the approval is 

set forth in the direct final rule. If no 

adverse comments are received in 

response to this rule, no further activity 

is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse 

comments, the direct final rule will be 

withdrawn and all public comments 

received will be addressed in a 

subsequent final rule based on this 

proposed rule. EPA will not institute a 

second comment period on this 

document. Any parties interested in 

commenting on this document should 

do so at this time. 

Dated: May 1, 2013. 

A. Stanley Meiburg, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4. 

[FR Doc. 2013–11563 Filed 5–15–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R04–OAR–2013–0223; FRL–9813–7] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; Georgia; State 

Implementation Plan Miscellaneous 

Revisions 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing changes to 

the Georgia State Implementation Plan 

(SIP) submitted by the Georgia 

Environmental Protection Division to 

EPA in four separate SIP submittals 

dated September 15, 2008, August 30, 

2010 (two submittals), and December 

15, 2011. In the portions of the 

submittals being approved today, the 

SIP revisions update the Georgia SIP to 

reflect EPA’s current national ambient 

air quality standards for sulfur dioxide, 

nitrogen dioxide, ozone, lead, and 

particulate matter found in the Code of 

Federal Regulations. In the Final Rules 

Section of this Federal Register, EPA is 

approving the State’s implementation 

plan revision as a direct final rule 

without prior proposal because the 

Agency views this as a noncontroversial 

submittal and anticipates no adverse 

comments. A detailed rationale for the 

approval is set forth in the direct final 

rule. If no adverse comments are 

received in response to this rule, no 

further activity is contemplated. If EPA 

receives adverse comments, the direct 

final rule will be withdrawn and all 

public comments received will be 

addressed in a subsequent final rule 

based on this proposed rule. EPA will 

not institute a second comment period 

on this document. Any parties 

interested in commenting on this 

document should do so at this time. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before June 17, 2013. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04– 

OAR–2013–0223 by one of the following 

methods: 

1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

2. Email: R4-RDS@epa.gov. 

3. Fax: (404) 562–9019. 

4. Mail: EPA–R04–OAR–2013–0223, 

Regulatory Development Section, Air 

Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and 

Toxics Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. 

5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Lynorae 

Benjamin, Chief, Regulatory 

Development Section, Air Planning 

Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics 

Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Such 

deliveries are only accepted during the 

Regional Office’s normal hours of 

operation. The Regional Office’s official 

hours of business are Monday through 

Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding federal 

holidays. 

Please see the direct final rule which 

is located in the Rules section of this 

Federal Register for detailed 

instructions on how to submit 

comments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

information regarding this source 

specific SIP revision, contact Mr. 

Richard Wong, Regulatory Development 

Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, 

Pesticides and Toxics Management 

Division, U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, 

SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Mr. 

Wong’s telephone number is (404) 562– 

8726; email address: 

wong.richard@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For 

additional information see the direct 

final rule which is published in the 

Rules Section of this Federal Register. 

A detailed rationale for the approval is 

set forth in the direct final rule. If no 

adverse comments are received in 

response to this rule, no further activity 

is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse 

comments, the direct final rule will be 

withdrawn and all public comments 

received will be addressed in a 

subsequent final rule based on this 

proposed rule. EPA will not institute a 

second comment period on this 

document. Any parties interested in 

commenting on this document should 

do so at this time. 

Dated: May 3, 2013. 

A. Stanley Meiburg, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4. 

[FR Doc. 2013–11565 Filed 5–15–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R04–OAR–2013–0271; FRL–9814–2] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; Kentucky; 

Stage II Requirements for Enterprise 

Holdings, Inc. at Cincinnati/Northern 

Kentucky International Airport in 

Boone County 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve 

a source-specific State Implementation 

Plan (SIP) revision submitted to EPA by 

the Commonwealth of Kentucky, 

through the Kentucky Division for Air 

Quality (KDAQ) on April 25, 2013, for 

the purpose of exempting Enterprise 

Holdings, Inc., facility from the Clean 

Air Act (CAA or Act) Stage II vapor 

control requirements. The Enterprise 

Holdings, Inc., facility is currently being 

constructed at the Cincinnati/Northern 

Kentucky International Airport in Boone 

County, Kentucky. EPA’s proposed 

approval of this revision to Kentucky’s 

SIP is based on the December 12, 2006, 

EPA policy memorandum from Stephen 

D. Page, entitled ‘‘Removal of Stage II 

Vapor Recovery in Situations Where 

Widespread Use of Onboard Refueling 

Vapor Recovery is Demonstrated.’’ This 

action is being taken pursuant to the 

CAA. 


erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1