alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                          5
<CIK>                                              0000812818
<NAME>                                    Hutton Investors Futures Fund, L.P. II

<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                       JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                     15,484,725
<SECURITIES>                                                   10,700
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  71,354
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           15,566,779
<PP&E>                                                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             15,566,779
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         904,160
<BONDS>                                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                                 14,662,619
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               15,566,779
<SALES>                                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           (2,465,619)
<CGS>                                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               26,332
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            (2,491,951)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                               (2,491,951)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                    (743.95)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       0



</TABLE>
[No. 39057-1-I.

Division One.

December 1, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Daniel W. Collinsworth, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 96-1-00846-6, Larry A. Jordan, J., entered July 22, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion. Now published at 90 Wn. App. 546.
§ 139.165 Enriched vegetable noodle products. ( a ) Each of the noodle products for which a definition and standard of identity is prescribed by this section conforms to the definition and standard of identity and is subject to the requirements for label declaration of ingredients prescribed for noodle products by § 139.150 (a), (g), (h), and (i), and in addition is enriched to meet the requirements prescribed for enriched noodle products by § 139.155 and, except as hereinafter provided, contains a vegetable ingredient in compliance with the requirements prescribed for vegetable noodle products by § 139.160. Because they are apt to impart an egg-yolk color, carrots are not used in enriched vegetable noodle products.
( b ) The name of each food for which a definition and standard of identity is prescribed by this section is “Enriched ______ noodle product”, “Enriched ______ egg noodle product”, or, alternatively, the name is “Enriched ______ noodles”, or “Enriched ______ egg noodles”, “Enriched ______ egg macaroni”, “Enriched ______ egg spaghetti”, or “Enriched ______ egg vermicelli”, when the units comply with the size and shape requirements for noodles, macaroni, spaghetti, or vermicelli in § 139.150 (b), (c), (d), or (e). The blank in each instance is filled in with the name of the vegetable used, as specified in § 139.160(a).
[42 FR 14409, Mar. 15, 1977, as amended at 58 FR 2879, Jan. 6, 1993]
#### § 1308.01 Scope of this part.

Schedules of controlled substances established by section 202 of the Act (21 U.S.C. 812) and nonnarcotic substances, chemical preparations, veterinary anabolic steroid implant products, prescription products, anabolic steroid products, and cannabis plant material and products made therefrom that contain tetrahydrocannabinols excluded pursuant to section 201 of the Act (21 U.S.C. 811), as they are changed, updated, and republished from time to time, are set forth in this part.

[81 FR 97021, Dec. 30, 2016]
Eagle Ford - South Texas

Reservoir Profile

Geologic Age: Cretaceous, 100 MYA

Lithology: Bituminous Shales

Total Area Size (sq mi): 1,350

Total Gas (tcf): 84

GIP (bcf/sq mi): 200

Producable Gas (tcf): 9.0

Avg. Well Depth (feet): 11,500

Thickness (feet): 250

Horizontal Well Cost ($M): 4.8

Average EUR: 5.5

Pressure (psi): 5,200

Temperature (F): 335

Ro: 1.5
TOC (%): 4.5

Porosity (%): 11

Matrix Permeability (nD): 1,100

Pressure Gradient (psi/ft): 0.65

Clay Content (%): 8.0

Silica/Calcite/Carbonate (%): 87

Adsorbed Gas (%): 20

Average IP: 6.2

Reservoir Summary

One of the newest shale gas plays is the Cretaceous Eagle Ford, located in South 

Texas. It is early for USGS gas estimates, but individual wells are expected to produce 

5.5 bcf, from depths of about 11,500 feet and 250 foot formation thickness. Typical 

porosities of 11% and permeability in excess of 1 microdarcy are bringing on wells at 

initial production rates in the mid-teen mmcf per day. Seismic and microseismic data 

is of excellent quality in the Eagle Ford play and is useful for drilling and completions 

planning.

Click Images to Enlarge
EX-34.2
(logo) pwc


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


To the Board of Directors and shareholders of CoreLogic, Inc.:


We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on
Assessment of Compliance, that CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc.
(the "Company"), an indirect subsidiary of CoreLogic, Inc. complied with the
servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange
Commission's Regulation AB for all loans for commercial mortgage loan
outsourcing customers for which the Company served as the commercial tax service
provider (the "Platform"), as of December 31, 2013 and for the year then ended,
only including 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(v), 1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(2)(vii),
1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), which the Company has
determined are applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with
respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance
with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
management's assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance
with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as
we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing
of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining
whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected
servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this
report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from
errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have
affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during
the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal
determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2013 for all loans for commercial mortgage loan outsourcing
customers for which the Company served as the commercial tax service provider is
fairly stated, in all material respects.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


February 14, 2014


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 1800, Dallas, Texas 75201
T: (214) 999-1400, F: (214) 754-7991, www.pwc.com/us
# m8779.docx

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 02.03.2018 C(2018) 1436 final To the notifying party . Subject : Case M. 87 79 - PAI PARTNERS / ALBÉ A Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1 )( b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 1 and Article 57 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area 2 Dear Sir or Madam, 1. On 29 January 2018 , the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which PAI Partners S.A.S. (“ PAI Partners ”) (France), is an independent company which manages and advises dedicated private equity funds acquire s within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control over the whole of the undertaking Albéa S.A. ( Albéa ) (Luxembourg), indirectly controlled by funds managed by Sun Capital Parners by way of purchase of shares . 3 2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are: - PAI Partners S.A.S. (“PAI Partners”) (France), is an independent company which manages and advises dedicated private equity funds. - Albéa S.A. (Albéa) (Luxembourg), indirectly controlled by funds managed by Sun Capital Parners. 3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5 ( b ) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 . 4 4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1 )( b) of the Merger Regulation and Article 57 of the EEA Agreement . For the Commission (Signed)
Johannes LAITENBERGER Director - General
(1)
OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ( the ' Merger Regulation ' ). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( ' TFEU ' ) has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of ' Community ' by ' Union ' and ' common market ' by ' internal market ' . The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.
(2) OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3 ( the ' EEA Agreement ' ).
(3) Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 43 , 6.2 .2018 , p. 5 .
(4)
OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5 .
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS IN FORM 10-Q FOR MEDIALINK WORLDWIDE INCORPORATED FOR THE
PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,536,466
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,780,146
<ALLOWANCES>                                       273,000
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,360,955
<PP&E>                                           5,797,038
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,003,926
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  33,499,634
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,457,897
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            55,564
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,771,823
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    33,499,634
<SALES>                                         32,228,652
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                32,228,652
<CGS>                                           10,934,011
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,934,011
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,932,176
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  40,208
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,549,804
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,030,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,519,804
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,519,804
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.25



</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 17
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 17 appear at 68 FR 24879, May 9, 2003, and at 88 FR 45065, July 14, 2023.

§ 17.21 Prehearing conferences. ( a ) The presiding officer may schedule prehearing conferences as appropriate.
( b ) Upon the motion of any party, the presiding officer shall schedule at least one prehearing conference at a reasonable time in advance of the hearing.
( c ) The presiding officer may use a prehearing conference to discuss the following: ( 1 ) Simplification of the issues;
( 2 ) The necessity or desirability of amendments to the pleadings, including the need for a more definite statement;
( 3 ) Stipulations and admissions of fact as to the contents and authenticity of documents;
( 4 ) Whether the parties can agree to submission of the case on a stipulated record;
( 5 ) Whether a party chooses to waive appearance at an oral hearing and to submit only documentary evidence (subject to the objection of the other party) and written argument;
( 6 ) Limitation of the number of witnesses;
( 7 ) Scheduling dates for the exchange of witness lists and of proposed exhibits;
( 8 ) Discovery and scheduling dates for completion of discovery;
( 9 ) The date, time, and place for the hearing; and
( 10 ) Such other matters as may tend to expedite the fair and just disposition of the proceedings.
( d ) The presiding officer shall issue an order containing all matters agreed upon by the parties or ordered by the presiding officer at a prehearing conference.
#### MERCHANT, Respondent, v. RYALL et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

December 11, 1914.)

Action 'Metía F. Merchant M. Ryall and others.

No opinion. Motion for reargument (150 N. Y. Supp. 1096) denied, without costs. Defendant Ryall's motion for judgment dismissing the complaint denied, without costs.
Exhibit 31.1

        SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, John C. Kleinert, Chief Executive Officer of Velocity Asset Management, Inc.
(the "Company") do hereby certify that:

         1.       I have reviewed this amended quarterly report on Form 10-QSB
of the Company;

         2.       Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and

         3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Company as of, and for, the period presented in this report.

         4.       The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the Company and have:

                  (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedure, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed, to ensure that material
information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this report is being prepared;

                  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

                  (c) disclosed in this report any changes in the Company's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the company's
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting;
and

         5.       The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the Company's auditors and the audit
committee of the Company's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

                  (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which hare reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and

                  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's
internal control over financial reporting.

                                        /s/ JOHN C. KLEINERT
                                        --------------------------------
                                        John C. Kleinert
                                        Chief Executive Officer

August 10, 2005


                                       24
Exhibit






FIRST AMENDMENT
TO UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION
2016 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN
The first sentence of Section 4.01 of the United States Steel Corporation 2016 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended to read as follows, subject to and conditioned upon the approval of the stockholders of the Corporation at the Corporation’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April 25, 2017:
“The maximum number of Shares which may be issued and in respect of which Awards may be granted under the Plan shall be limited to 13,500,000 Shares, subject to adjustments provided in Section 8.01, which may be used for all forms of Awards (such Shares may be referred to as “Available Shares”).”
If this First Amendment to the United States Steel Corporation 2016 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan (“First Amendment”) is approved by the stockholders at the Corporation’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April 25, 2017, it shall be effective on such date.  If this First Amendment is not approved by the stockholders at the Corporation’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April 25, 2017, it shall be null and void and of no effect.  
Adopted by the Board of Directors of the Corporation the 28th day of February, 2017.
Exhibit 10.1

 

AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO

 

DEFERRED INCOME PLAN FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS, AS
 AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2009

 

WHEREAS, at its meeting held on December 2, 2015, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Textron Inc. (the “Company”) approved changes to the compensation program for the Board which, among other things, increased the amount of the Board members’ annual retainer required to be deferred into the Stock Unit Account of the Deferred Income Plan for Non-Employee Directors (the “Plan”) from $100,000 to $120,000, effective as of January 1, 2016;

 

WHEREAS, the Company wishes to amend the Plan to formally incorporate this change into the terms of the Plan;

 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Company hereby amends the Plan, effective as of January 1, 2016, as follows:

 

1.                                    Section 1.04(a) of the Plan is hereby amended to change “$100,000” to “$120,000”.

 

2.                                    Section 2.02 of the Plan is hereby amended to change “$100,000” to “$120,000”.

 

3.                                    Section 2.03 of the Plan is hereby amended to change “$100,000” to “$120,000”.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Textron Inc. has caused this amendment to be executed by its duly authorized officer.

 

	
 
    	
TEXTRON INC.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Dated: March 1, 2017
    	
By
    	
/s/ E. Robert Lupone
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
E. Robert Lupone
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Executive Vice   President,
   General Counsel and Secretary
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1054 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1054

       To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to ensure that 
 electrochromic glass qualifies as energy property for purposes of the 
                             energy credit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 4, 2017

Mr. Wicker (for himself and Mr. Markey) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to ensure that 
 electrochromic glass qualifies as energy property for purposes of the 
                             energy credit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Dynamic Glass Act''.

SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF ELECTROCHROMIC GLASS AS ENERGY PROPERTY.

    (a) In General.--Clause (i) of section 48(a)(3)(A) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting ``(including use of 
electrochromic glass)'' after ``a structure''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```