Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 5, 2011 / Notices 585 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Inv. No. 337–TA–754] 

In the Matter of Certain Handbags, 

Luggage, Accessories and Packaging 

Thereof; Notice of Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Institution of investigation 

pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

complaint was filed with the U.S. 

International Trade Commission on 

December 3, 2010, under section 337 of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 

U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Louis Vuitton 

Malletier S.A. of France and Louis 

Vuitton U.S. Manufacturing, Inc. of San 

Dimas, California. An amended 

complaint was filed on December 10, 

2010. On December 16, 2010, 

complainants filed supplemental 

materials. The amended complaint 

alleges violations of section 337 based 

upon the importation into the United 

States, the sale for importation, and the 

sale within the United States after 

importation of certain handbags. 

luggage, accessories and packaging 

thereof by reason of infringement of U.S. 

Trademark Registration No. 297,594 

(‘‘the ‘594 trademark’’); U.S. Trademark 

Registration No. 1,643,625 (‘‘the ‘625 

trademark’’); U.S. Trademark 

Registration No. 1,653,663 (‘‘the ‘663 

trademark’’); U.S. Trademark 

Registration No. 1,875,198 (‘‘the ‘198 

trademark’’); U.S. Trademark 

Registration No. 2,773,107 (‘‘the ‘107 

trademark’’); U.S. Trademark 

Registration No. 2,177,828 (‘‘the ‘828 

trademark’’); U.S. Trademark 

Registration No. 2,181,753 (‘‘the ‘753 

trademark’’); and U.S. Trademark 

Registration No. 1,519,828 (‘‘the ‘828 

trademark’’). The complaint further 

alleges that an industry in the United 

States exists as required by subsection 

(a)(2) of section 337. 

The complainants request that the 

Commission institute an investigation 

and, after the investigation, issue an 

exclusion order and cease and desist 

orders. 

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for 

any confidential information contained 

therein, is available for inspection 

during official business hours (8:45 a.m. 

to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the 

Secretary, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 

112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 

202–205–2000. Hearing impaired 

individuals are advised that information 

on this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on 202–205–1810. Persons 

with mobility impairments who will 

need special assistance in gaining access 

to the Commission should contact the 

Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its Internet server at http:// 

www.usitc.gov. The public record for 

this investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erin 

D. E. Joffre, Esq., Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, telephone (202) 205–2550. 

Authority: The authority for 

institution of this investigation is 

contained in section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, and in section 

210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 

(2010). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

December 28, 2010, Ordered That— 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine whether there is a 

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of certain handbags, 

luggage, accessories and packaging 

thereof that infringe the ‘594 trademark; 

the ‘625 trademark; the ‘663 trademark; 

the ‘198 trademark; the ‘107 trademark; 

the ‘828 trademark; the ‘753 trademark; 

and the ‘828 trademark, and whether an 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by subsection (a)(2) of section 

337; 

(2) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainants are: 

Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A., 2 Rue du 

Pont Neuf, Paris, France 75034. 

Louis Vuitton U.S. Manufacturing, Inc., 

321 W. Covina Boulevard, San Dimas, 

CA 91773–2907. 

(b) The respondents are the following 

entities alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and are the parties upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

T&T Handbag Industrial Co., Ltd., Room 

4202, Tower B, KingGu Building, 

HeGuang Road, TianHe District, 

Guangzhou, China. 

Sanjiu Leather Co., Ltd. of Guangzhou, 

9 Longgui Section (Nancun #4 

Economic Community), National 

Road 106, Baiyun District, 

Guangzhou, China. 

Meada Corporation (d/b/a Diophy 

International), 9319A Telstar Avenue, 

El Monte, CA 91731–2815. 

Pacpro, Inc., 9319A Telstar Avenue, El 

Monte, CA 91731–2815. 

Jianyong Zheng (a/k/a Jiu Gao Zheng, 

Jiu An Zheng, Jian Yong Zheng, Peter 

Zheng), 886 S. Golden West Avenue, 

Arcadia, CA 91007–6563. 

Alice Bei Wang (a/k/a Alice B. Wang), 

886 S. Golden West Avenue, Arcadia, 

CA 91007–6563. 

Trendy Creations, Inc., 9851 Mason 

Avenue, Chatsworth, CA 91311. 

The Inspired Bagger, 8444 Endicott 

Lane, Dallas, TX 75227. 

House of Bags, 1125–8 Maple Alley, Los 

Angeles, CA 90015. 

Ronett Trading, Inc. (d/b/a Ronett 

Wholesale & Import), 43 West 27th 

Street, New York, NY 10001. 

EZ Shine Group, Inc., 48 West 27th 

Street, New York, NY 10001. 

Master of Handbags, 1153 Santee Street, 

Los Angeles, CA 90015. 

Choicehandbag.com, Inc. (d/b/a Choice 

Handbags), 1100 S. Main Street, Los 

Angeles, CA 90015. 

Rasul Enterprises, LLC (d/b/a The 

Handbag Warehouse), 11536 Harry 

Hines Blvd. Suite #205, Dallas, TX 

75229. 

(c) The Commission investigative 

attorney, party to this investigation, is 

Erin D. E. Joffre, Esq., Office of Unfair 

Import Investigations, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and 

(3) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Honorable Paul J. Luckern, Chief 

Administrative Law Judge, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, shall 

designate the presiding Administrative 

Law Judge. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondents in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(d)–(e) and 210.13(a), 

such responses will be considered by 

the Commission if received not later 

than 20 days after the date of service by 

the Commission of the complaint and 

the notice of investigation. Extensions of 

time for submitting responses to the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation will not be granted unless 

good cause therefor is shown. 

Failure of a respondent to file a timely 

response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
586 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 5, 2011 / Notices 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: December 29, 2010. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–33249 Filed 1–4–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree 

Under the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, 

Compensation, and Liability Act 

(‘‘CERCLA’’) 

Notice is hereby given that on 

December 22, 2010 a proposed consent 

decree (‘‘proposed Decree’’) in United 

States v. Alcoa, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 

3:10-cv-532, was lodged with the United 

States District Court for the Northern 

District of Indiana. 

In this action under Sections 106(a) 

and 107(a) of the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, 

Compensation, and Liability Act, 42 

U.S.C. 9606(a) & 9607(a) (‘‘CERCLA’’), 

the United States and the State of 

Indiana seek to enjoin the Defendants to 

perform a remedial action to address an 

imminent and substantial endangerment 

to the public health, public welfare and 

the environment caused by actual or 

threatened releases of hazardous 

substances from the Cam-Or National 

Priorities List Site (‘‘the Cam-Or Site’’) 

located in Westville, LaPorte County, 

Indiana, and to recover response costs 

that the United States and Indiana have 

incurred and will incur in the future at 

the Cam-Or Site. The proposed Decree 

requires the Settling Work Parties 

(Alcoa, Inc., ANR Pipeline Company, C. 

Stoddard & Sons, Inc., Clean Harbors 

Environmental Services, Inc., 

Consolidated Rail Corporation, CSX 

Transportation, Inc., Ford Motor 

Company, Imperial Oil Limited, 

Ingersoll-Rand Company, Northern 

Indiana Public Service Company, 

Rockwell Automation, Tennessee Gas 

Pipeline Company, and United States 

Steel Corporation) to construct and 

operate a soil containment system, to 

design, install, operate and maintain a 

groundwater pump and treat system, to 

design, install, operate, and maintain a 

light non-aqueous phase liquid 

remediation system, to install and 

operate a monitoring system for the 

remedial action, and to develop and 

implement a plan for institutional 

controls at the Site. 

Additionally, under the Consent 

Decree the Settling Work Parties have 

agreed to pre-pay $2.2 million into a 

Site special account to be used for 

future oversight costs of the United 

States Environmental Protection Agency 

(‘‘U.S. EPA’’), and if and when such 

fund, plus interest, is depleted, to pay 

50% of any additional U.S. EPA 

oversight costs. Further, under the 

Decree the Settling Work Parties have 

agreed to pay all of U.S. EPA’s other 

future response costs; to pay all of the 

Indiana Department of Environmental 

Management’s future oversight costs 

and other future response costs; and to 

pay $200,000 toward approximately 

$3.4 million in pre-entry unreimbursed 

response costs incurred by the United 

States. The Decree would provide 

covenants not to sue to the Settling 

Work Parties and, if they choose to sign 

the Consent Decree, to numerous other 

potentially responsible parties who have 

previously settled with one or more of 

the Settling Work Parties (listed in 

Appendix E to the Decree) and who 

received indemnification from such 

parties. 

The Department of Justice will receive 

for a period of thirty (30) days from the 

date of this publication comments 

relating to the proposed Decree. 

Comments should be addressed to the 

Assistant Attorney General, 

Environment and Natural Resources 

Division, and either emailed to 

pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov or 

mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Washington, DC 

20044–7611, and should refer to United 

States v. Alcoa, Inc., et al., D.J. Ref. 90– 

11–3–609/1. 

The proposed Decree may be 

examined at the Office of the United 

States Attorney for the Northern District 

of Indiana, South Bend Division, 204 

South Main Street, South Bend, Indiana 

46601–2122, or the United States 

Environmental Protection Agency 

(Region 5) Records Center, Room 714, 

77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 

Illinois 60604. During the public 

comment period, the proposed Decree 

may also be examined on the following 

Department of Justice Web site: http:// 

www.usdoj.gov/enrd/Consent 

Decrees.html. A copy of the proposed 

Decree may also be obtained by mail 

from the Consent Decree Library, P.O. 

Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, 

Washington, DC 20044–7611 or by 

faxing or e-mailing a request to Tonia 

Fleetwood (tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), 

fax no. (202) 514–0097, phone 

confirmation number (202) 514–1547. In 

requesting a copy from the Consent 

Decree Library, please enclose a check 

in the amount of $41.50 (25 cents per 

page reproduction cost) payable to the 

U.S. Treasury or, if by e-mail or fax, 

forward a check in that amount to the 

Consent Decree Library at the stated 

address. 

Maureen Katz, 

Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement 

Section, Environment and Natural Resources 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 2010–33327 Filed 1–4–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Drug Enforcement Administration 

Importer of Controlled Substances; 

Notice of Registration 

By Notice dated October 19, 2010, and 

published in the Federal Register on 

October 26, 2010, 75 FR 65658, 

Noramco, Inc., Division of OrthoMcNeil, Inc., 500 Swedes Landing Road, 

Wilmington, Delaware 19801, made 

application by renewal to the Drug 

Enforcement Administration (DEA) to 

be registered as an importer of the 

following basic classes of controlled 

substances: 

Drug Schedule 

Opium, raw (9600) ....................... II 

Concentrate of Poppy Straw 

(9670).

II 

Tapentadol (9780) ........................ II 

The company plans to import the Raw 

Opium (9600) and Concentrate of Poppy 

Straw (9670) to manufacture other 

controlled substances. The company 

plans to import Tapentadol (9780) in 

intermediate form for the bulk 

manufacture of Tapentadol (9780) 

which it will distribute to its customers. 

No comments or objections have been 

received. DEA has considered the 

factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and 952(a), 

and determined that the registration of 

Noramco Inc. to import the basic classes 

of controlled substances is consistent 

with the public interest and with United 

States obligations under international 

treaties, conventions, or protocols in 

effect on May 1, 1971. DEA has 

investigated Noramco Inc. to ensure that 

the company’s registration is consistent 

with the public interest. The 

investigation has included inspection 

and testing of the company’s physical 

security systems, verification of the 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES