alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2018154EN.01000101.xml

| 18.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 154/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.6.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 154/1

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2018/875

of 15 June 2018

amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 concerning certain specific restrictions on economic and financial relations with Iraq

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 of 7 July 2003 concerning certain specific restrictions on economic and financial relations with Iraq and repealing Regulation (EC) No 2465/96 (1), and in particular Article 11(b) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 lists public bodies, corporations and agencies and natural and legal persons, bodies and entities of the previous government of Iraq covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources that were located outside Iraq on the date of 22 May 2003 under that Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 lists public bodies, corporations and agencies and natural and legal persons, bodies and entities of the previous government of Iraq covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources that were located outside Iraq on the date of 22 May 2003 under that Regulation.

| (2) | On 7 June 2018, the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council decided to remove one entry from the list of persons or entities to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources should apply. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 7 June 2018, the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council decided to remove one entry from the list of persons or entities to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources should apply.

| (3) | Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 is amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 June 2018.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Head of the Service for Foreign Policy Instruments

---

(1)  
  OJ L 169, 8.7.2003, p. 6.

1

---

ANNEX

In Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003, the following entry is deleted:

| ‘1. | Central Bank of Iraq, Rashid Street, Baghdad, Iraq. Other information: former Governor was Dr Issam El Moulla HWEISH; offices in Mosul and Basra.’ |
| --- | --- |

‘1.

---
#### § 1.1125 What are the internal audit requirements for a recognized accreditation body?

As part of the internal audit a recognized accreditation body is required to conduct pursuant to § 1.1113(a), the recognized accreditation body must audit its compliance with the requirements of § 1.1113(d).
§ 1301.73 Physical security controls for non-practitioners; compounders for narcotic treatment programs; manufacturing and compounding areas. All manufacturing activities (including processing, packaging and labeling) involving controlled substances listed in any schedule and all activities of compounders shall be conducted in accordance with the following: ( a ) All in-process substances shall be returned to the controlled substances storage area at the termination of the process. If the process is not terminated at the end of a workday (except where a continuous process or other normal manufacturing operation should not be interrupted), the processing area or tanks, vessels, bins or bulk containers containing such substances shall be securely locked, with adequate security for the area or building. If such security requires an alarm, such alarm, upon unauthorized entry, shall transmit a signal directly to a central station protection company, or local or state police agency which has a legal duty to respond, or a 24-hour control station operated by the registrant.
( b ) Manufacturing activities with controlled substances shall be conducted in an area or areas of clearly defined limited access which is under surveillance by an employee or employees designated in writing as responsible for the area. “Limited access” may be provided, in the absence of physical dividers such as walls or partitions, by traffic control lines or restricted space designation. The employee designated as responsible for the area may be engaged in the particular manufacturing operation being conducted: *Provided,* That he is able to provide continuous surveillance of the area in order that unauthorized persons may not enter or leave the area without his knowledge.
( c ) During the production of controlled substances, the manufacturing areas shall be accessible to only those employees required for efficient operation. When it is necessary for employee maintenance personnel, nonemployee maintenance personnel, business guests, or visitors to be present in or pass through manufacturing areas during production of controlled substances, the registrant shall provide for adequate observation of the area by an employee specifically authorized in writing.
[36 FR 18731, Sept. 21, 1971. Redesignated at 38 FR 26609, Sept. 24, 1973 and amended at 39 FR 37984, Oct. 25, 1974]
###### Editorial Note on Part 172

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 172 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; 70 FR 72074, Dec. 1, 2005; and 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

#### § 172.365 Kelp.

Kelp may be safely added to a food as a source of the essential mineral iodine, provided the maximum intake of the food as may be consumed during a period of one day, or as directed for use in the case of a dietary supplement, will not result in daily ingestion of the additive so as to provide a total amount of iodine in excess of 225 micrograms for foods labeled without reference to age or physiological state; and when age or the conditions of pregnancy or lactation are specified, in excess of 45 micrograms for infants, 105 micrograms for children under 4 years of age, 225 micrograms for adults and children 4 or more years of age, and 300 micrograms for pregnant or lactating women. The food additive kelp is the dehydrated, ground product prepared from *Macrocystis pyrifera, Laminaria digitata, Laminaria saccharina,* and *Laminaria cloustoni.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
FDS for Third quarter 1999 10-q
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   77,223
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,775
<INVENTORY>                                    161,888
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               250,615
<PP&E>                                       1,191,913
<DEPRECIATION>                                 374,517
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,331,540
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          141,622
<BONDS>                                        375,594
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            34
<OTHER-SE>                                     616,249
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,331,540
<SALES>                                        674,732
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               674,732
<CGS>                                          608,223
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  608,223
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,715
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (17,967)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (5,167)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,800)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                      (1,769)
<NET-INCOME>                                  (14,569)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.47)


</TABLE>
### Depletion of streamflow by infiltration in the main channels of the Tucson basin, southeastern Arizona

By: D. E. Burkham

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1939B

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Depletion of streamflow by infiltration in the main channels of the Tucson basin, southeastern Arizona(1970)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
No adivine si califica para el EITC. Infórmese.

No califico.

No califico. No califico.

No califico.

No califico.

Califico. 

Califico. 

Califico. 

Califico. 

Califico. 

nal Revenue Service

.irs.gov/eitc

Publication 4256 SP Catalog Number 37899Z (12-2003)
Internal Revenue Service

www.irs.gov/eitc

Para más información sobre el EITC, 

visite www.irs.gov/eitc o llame al 1-800-829-1040.

dito por Ingreso del Trabajo 2003

Forma correcta de reportar sus ingresosUsted debe haber trabajado y recibido ingresos menores a:• $11,230 ($12,230 si es casado(a) y 

declara conjuntamente) si no tiene un hijo(a) calificado(a), ó

• $29,666 ($30,666 si es casado(a) y 

declara conjuntamente) si tiene un hijo(a) calificado(a), ó

• $33,692 ($34,692 si es casado(a) y 

declara conjuntamente) si tiene más de un hijo(a) calificado(a)

Estado civil para efectos de la declaraciónNo puede estar casado(a) y presentar su declaración por separado.Errores comunes que debe evitar• Los contribuyentes reclaman un hijo(a) 

que no es un hijo(a) calificado(a)

• Contribuyentes casados que deben presentar su declaración como 

“casados declarando por separado”, presentan su declaracióncomo “soltero(a)” o “jefe de familia” (head of household)

• Errores al reportar los ingresos• Contribuyentes o hijos(as) calificados(as) con números de

Seguro Social incorrectos 

uede con la duda. 

si califica para el EITC.

ser elegible para el Crédito por Ingreso

e los requisitos que se presentan a

os a la mano. Visite a su preparador

uar si puede reclamar el EITC.

os contribuyentes deben 

es requisitos:

el trabajo

del Seguro Social

imitado a $2,600

tos de la declaración no puede 

ndo su declaración por separado”

o ciudadano(a) o residente 

dos Unidos durante todo el año

calificado(a) de otra persona

orma 2555 ó la Forma 2555-EZ

esos provenientes del extranjero)

ón de hijos(as)

 puede ser reclamado por más de una

on los requisitos de parentesco, 

):

s 25 años y ser menor de 65 años

 dependiente de otra persona

s Estados Unidos por más de
San Joaquin Valley 	 i] ~ 

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT 	 HEALTHY AIR LIVING'· 

June 21, 2011 

Mr. Mike Guzzetta, Manager 

Rule Evaluation Section 

California Air Resources Board 

P.O. Box 2815 

Sacramento, CA 95812 

Dear Mr. Guzzetta: 

Attached is the Rule Action Package for Rule 2410 (Prevention of Significant Deterioration) 

that was adopted by the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District's Governing 

Board on June 16, 2011. We request the California Air Resources Board (ARB) transmit this 

rule and the appropriate documentation to the United States Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) as a SIP revision. 

Included in this Rule Action Package are the following attachments: 

1. 	 ARB SIP Completeness Checklist 

2. 	 ARB APCD/AQMD Rule Evaluation Form 

3. 	 Clean copy of Rule 2410 

4. 	 Governing Board Resolution 

5. 	 Evidence of Public Hearing 

6. 	 Other Materials (Staff Report, Public Comments and District Responses, Draft Rules, 

and Board Memo) 

If you have any questions regarding this rule, please contact Carlos Garcia at (559) 230­

6000 or bye-mail at carlos.garcia@valleyair.org. The District thanks you and your staff for 

your assistance. 

David Warner. 


Director of Permit Services 


Attachments 


Northern Region Central Region (Main Office) Southern Region 

4800 Enterprise Way 1990 E. Gettysburg Av enue 34946 Flyover Court 

Modesto, CA 95356­8718 Fresno, CA 93726-0244 Bakersfield, CA 93308­9725 

Tel: (209) 557-6400 FAX: (209) 557-6475 Tel: (559) 230-6000 FAX : (559) 230-6061 Tel: 661 -392-5500 FAX: 661 -392-5585 

www.valieyair.org www_healthyairliving .com Printed on recy cled paper. 0
ex101


    

     

    
      
         

      

      
         

        
          

        

      

      
         

      

    

     

    RECEIPT

    


    


    


    


    This
      hereby acknowledges the receipt of $100.00 from Pacific Syndicated Resources
      Ltd., (“Pacific”) of Las Vegas, Nevada as payment in full for staking services
      of the April Hope property on behalf of Pacific. Reimbursement of recording
      fees
      to Kathryn Witter is hereby waived.

    


    With
      this acknowledged receipt of payment 100% ownership and title to the April
      Hope
      property has transferred to Pacific.

    


    


    


    


    Kathryn
      Witter

    April
      21, 2006.
# EUR-Lex - 31994D0067 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31994D0067

**Council Decision of 24 January 1994 on the conclusion of a Protocol on financial and technical cooperation between the European Economic Community and the Syrian Arab Republic **

*
Official Journal L 032 , 05/02/1994 P. 0044 - 0044 Finnish special edition: Chapter 11 Volume 29 P. 0006 Swedish special edition: Chapter 11 Volume 29 P. 0006 *

COUNCIL DECISION of 24 January 1994 on the conclusion of a Protocol on financial and technical cooperation between the European Economic Community and the Syrian Arab Republic (94/67/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 238, in conjunction with Article 228 (3) second subparagraph thereof,

Having regard to the recommendation from the Commission (1),

Having regard to the assent of the European Parliament (2),

Whereas the Protocol on financial and technical cooperation between the European Economic Community and the Syrian Arab Republic should be approved,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The Protocol on financial and technical cooperation between the European Economic Community and the Syrian Arab Republic is hereby approved on behalf of the Community.

The text of the Protocol is attached to this Decision.

Article 2

The President of the Council shall give the notification provided for in Article 22 (1) of the Protocol (3).

Article 3

This Decision shall take effect on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

Done at Brussels, 24 January 1994.

For the Council

The President

G. MORAITIS

(1) OJ No C 16, 24. 1. 1991, p. 9.

(2) OJ No C 20, 24. 1. 1994.

(3) See page 49 of this Official Journal.
#### Rony Manoly, Appellant, v City of New York et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.

[816 NYS2d 499]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Partnow, J.), dated November 12, 2004, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendants City of New York and the New York City Parks Department which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff was playing soccer on a field at the Parade Grounds in Brooklyn when he tripped on a raised manhole cover and subsequently struck his face on an adjacent fence, thereby sustaining various personal injuries.

On appeal, the plaintiff contends that “the City failed to maintain the manhole to assure that it was not raised, and also failed to maintain the fence, resulting in a hazard if a person fell.”

The doctrine of assumption of risk is a form of measurement of a defendant’s duty to a voluntary participant in a sporting activity *(see Benitez v New York City Bd. of Educ.,*73 NY2d 650, 657 [1989]). The voluntary participant is deemed to have consented to apparent or reasonably foreseeable consequences of engaging in the sport; the landowner need protect the plaintiff only from unassumed, concealed, or unreasonably increased risks, thus to make conditions as safe as they appear to be *(see Morgan v State of New York,*90 NY2d 471, 484 [1997]; *Lapinski v Hunter Mtn. Ski Bowl,*306 AD2d 320 [2003]). The plaintiff acknowledged at the hearing pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-h that he noticed the raised manhole on the *650previous occasion that he played soccer at the field. At his examination before trial, the plaintiff indicated that, on the date of his accident, but prior to it, he was aware of the presence of the raised manhole cover, and that the fence was in disrepair. The plaintiff accordingly assumed the risk of the injuries which he sustained in the accident *(see Sykes v County of Erie,*94 NY2d 912, 913 [2000]; *Joseph v New York Racing Assn.,*28 AD3d 105 [2006]; *Ciocchi v Mercy Coll.,*289 AD2d 362 [2001]). Miller, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein and Lunn, JJ., concur.
226 So.2d 521

#### Elsie M. BRADFORD v. DEPARTMENT OF HOSPITALS, State of Louisiana.

No. 49949.

Oct. 1, 1969.

In re: Harold E. Forbes, Director of Personnel of the State Department of Civil *757.'Service applying for certiorari or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. 222 So.2d 891.

It is ordered that the writ of review is.•sue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be ■notified.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7667

LARRY WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

S. WARDEN BODISON; WARDEN F. THOMPSON; CAPTAIN BRITENHART; 

GOODWING GEORGE; LT. D. MAGHEE; WARDEN HUNTED; SGT. WILSON; 

JON OZMINT; NFN MAHAFF; SGT. SANFORD; NFN JEFFERSON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Charleston. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. 

(2:14-cv-04289-MGL)

Submitted: February 23, 2016 Decided: February 26, 2016

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Williams, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Larry Williams appeals the district court’s order accepting 

the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 

42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) 

(2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. Williams v. Bodison, No. 2:14-cv-04289-MGL

(D.S.C. Sept. 21, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 111.1 Who is subject to this part? ( a ) Except as provided by paragraph (b) of this section, you are subject to this part if you manufacture, package, label, or hold a dietary supplement, including: ( 1 ) A dietary supplement you manufacture but that is packaged or labeled by another person; and
( 2 ) A dietary supplement imported or offered for import in any State or territory of the United States, the District of Columbia, or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
( b ) The requirements pertaining to holding dietary supplements do not apply to you if you are holding those dietary supplements at a retail establishment for the sole purpose of direct retail sale to individual consumers. A retail establishment does not include a warehouse or other storage facility for a retailer or a warehouse or other storage facility that sells directly to individual consumers.
427 A.2d 1203

#### Commonwealth v. Derr, Sr., Appellant.

Submitted September 13, 1979.

Joseph S. Falchek, for appellant;

Chester B. Muroski, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before PRICE, WIEAND and VAN der VOORT, JJ.*

*

 Judge Donald E. Wieand is sitting by special designation.

Order affirmed.
#### § 3603.1 Adoption of 2 CFR Part 200.

Under the authority listed above, the Executive Office of the President, Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) adopts the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Guidance in 2 CFR part 200. Thus, this part gives regulatory effect to the OMB guidance and supplements the guidance as needed for ONDCP.
### Flow of springs and small streams in the Tecolote Tunnel area of Santa Barbara County, California

By: S. E. Rantz

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1619R

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.