alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [AA-12124; LLAK-962000-L14100000-HY0000-P]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of decision approving lands for conveyance.

# SUMMARY:

As required by 43 CFR 2650.7(d), notice is hereby given that an appealable decision approving the conveyance of surface estate only for certain lands pursuant to the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act will be issued to The Aleut Corporation for 32.15 acres located on Adak Island, Alaska. Notice of the decision will also be published four times in the Anchorage Daily News.

# DATES:

The time limits for filing an appeal are:

1. Any party claiming a property interest which is adversely affected by the decision shall have until March 25, 2010 to file an appeal.

2. Parties receiving service of the decision by certified mail shall have 30 days from the date of receipt to file an appeal.

Parties who do not file an appeal in accordance with the requirements of 43 CFR Part 4, Subpart E, shall be deemed to have waived their rights.

# ADDRESSES:

A copy of the decision may be obtained from: Bureau of Land Management, Alaska State Office, 222 West Seventh Avenue, #13, Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7504.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                         The Bureau of Land Management by phone at 907-271-5960, or by e-mail at                         *ak.blm.conveyance@ak.blm.gov.*                         Persons who use a telecommunication device (TTD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339, 24 hours a day, seven days a week, to contact the Bureau of Land Management.                    

Dina L. Torres,

Land Transfer Resolution Specialist, Resolution Branch.

[FR Doc. 2010-3416 Filed 2-22-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-JA-P
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.6










PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL




To: Mr. Martin KING                             Lausanne, February 27, 2017


Subject: Merit Increase     




Dear Martin,


Further to your annual performance assessment we confirm that your 2017 merit increase amounts to 2.42%. 


As a result of this increase, effective April 1, 2017, the following conditions of your employment have been modified according to the information detailed below:


Gross Base Salary: CHF 845’004.-- annually, CHF 70’417.-- monthly 


Comparatio: 94%


All other conditions relating to your employment with Philip Morris Services S.A. remain as stated in your employment contract and in any subsequent amendments.


We would like to take this opportunity to wish you continued success and satisfaction.


 
Yours sincerely,


    


/S/ RALF ZYSK
Ralf Zysk
Vice President Compensation & Benefits  
and International Assignments 




Avenue de Cour 107, 1001 Lausanne, Switzerland  T:+41 (58) 242 00 00, F: +41 (58) 242 01 11
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 679 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 679

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                       January 8, 2018.
    Resolved, That unless otherwise ordered, the hour of daily meeting of the 
House shall be 2 p.m. on Mondays; noon on Tuesdays (or 2 p.m. if no legislative 
business was conducted on the preceding Monday); noon on Wednesdays and 
Thursdays; and 9 a.m. on all other days of the week.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Defendants’ Notice of Appeal Page 1 of 2 CAUSE NO. DC-13-12150

SAMROD CORPORATION d/b/a § IN THE DISTRICT COURT BIG D TRAVEL CENTER § § Plaintiff, § § v. § 192 ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT § HME EXECUTIVE COACH, INC. § and SHAHZAD AZIZ CHAUDHRY § § Defendants. § DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS

DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF APPEAL

May It Please The Court:
COME NOW, Defendants, HME Executive Coach, Inc. and Shahzad Aziz Chaudhry, by
and through undersigned counsel, and respectfully give notice of their intent to appeal the trial
court’s judgment rendered on January 14, 2015. This appeal is taken to the Fifth Court of Appeals at Dallas, Texas.
Respectfully submitted, J OHN H. C ARNEY & A SSOCIATES

By: /s/ Bernard E. Zwillenberg
John H. Carney johnhatchettcarney@gmail.com State Bar No. 03832200
Bernard E. Zwillenberg bernardezwillenberg@gmail.com State Bar No. 22299020

5005 Greenville Avenue, Suite 200 Dallas, Texas 75206 (214) 368-8300 – Telephone (214) 369-9979 – Facsimile Attorneys for Defendants FILED DALLAS COUNTY 2/13/2015 3:00:27 PM FELICIA PITR E DISTRICT CLER K Bridgette VationDefendants’ Notice of Appeal Page 2 of 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on this 13 th day of February, 2015, a true and correct copy of the foregoing document, Defendants’ Notice of Appeal has this day been served in accordance with the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure as shown below.

Sarah Schecter Andrew S. Gardner Modjarrad & Abusaad Law Firm 100 N. Central Expressway, Suite 1000 Richardson, Texas 75080 VIA: ____ CMRRR # ____ First Class Mail __X _ Facsimile to (972) 789-1665 ____ Hand-Delivery

/s/ Bernard E. Zwillenberg
Editorial Note on Part 173
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 173 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; and 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 173.45 Polymaleic acid and its sodium salt. Polymaleic acid (CAS Reg. No. 26099-09-2) and its sodium salt (CAS Reg. No. 70247-90-4) may be safely used in food in accordance with the following prescribed conditions: ( a ) The additives have a weight-average molecular weight in the range of 540 to 850 and a number-average molecular weight in the range of 520 to 650, calculated as the acid. Molecular weights shall be determined by a method entitled “Determination of Molecular Weight Distribution of Poly(Maleic) Acid,” March 17, 1992, produced by Ciba-Geigy, Inc., Seven Skyline Dr., Hawthorne, NY 10532-2188, which is incorporated by reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies are available from the Office of Food Additive Safety (HFS-200), Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Food and Drug Administration, 5001 Campus Dr., College Park, MD 20740, 240-402-1200, or are available for inspection at the Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852, 240-402-7500, between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .*
( b ) The additives may be used, individually or together, in the processing of beet sugar juice and liquor or of cane sugar juice and liquor to control mineral scale.
( c ) The additives are to be used so that the amount of either or both additives does not exceed 4 parts per million (calculated as the acid) by weight of the beet or cane sugar juice or liquor process stream.
[51 FR 5315, Feb. 13, 1986, as amended at 61 FR 386, Jan. 5, 1996; 78 FR 14665, Mar. 7, 2013; 81 FR 5592, Feb. 3, 2016; 88 FR 17722, Mar. 24, 2023]
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 832 

Recognizing linemen, the profession of linemen, the contributions of these 

brave men and women who protect public safety, and expressing support 

for the designation of April 18, 2018, as National Lineman Appreciation 

Day. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 16, 2018 

Mrs. HANDEL submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing linemen, the profession of linemen, the contributions of these brave men and women who protect public 

safety, and expressing support for the designation of 

April 18, 2018, as National Lineman Appreciation Day. 

Whereas the profession of linemen is steeped in personal, 

family, and professional tradition; 

Whereas linemen are often first responders during storms 

and other catastrophic events, working to make the scene 

safe for other public safety heroes; 

Whereas linemen must work high atop powerlines 24 hours 

a day, 365 days a year, to keep electricity flowing; 


lotter on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 832 IH 

Whereas linemen play a vital role in the Nation’s economy by 

maintaining and growing the energy infrastructure of the 

United States; 

Whereas linemen must often work under dangerous conditions separated from their families to keep schools and 

businesses open; 

Whereas linemen deserve recognition from the community regarding the danger of their work; and 

Whereas April 18, 2018, would be an appropriate date to 

designate as National Lineman Appreciation Day: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the efforts of linemen in keeping 

3 the power on and protecting public safety; and 

4 (2) supports the designation of National Line5 man Appreciation Day. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
# m8755.docx

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 14.2.2018 C(2018) 1037 final To the notifying parties Subject : Case M.8755 - PAI / BCIMC / REFRESCO Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1 )( b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 1 and Article 57 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area 2 Dear Sir or Madam, 1. On 23 January 2018 , the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which PAI Partners SAS (PAI) (France ) and British Columbia Investment Management Corporation ( bcIMC ) (Canada) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1 )( b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control over Refresco Group N.V. ( Refresco ) (The Netherlands) by way of pu blic bid . 3 2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are: - for PAI : management and advice of dedicated private equity funds which control companies active in five core sectors, i.e. business services ( e.g. audiovisual technical services, IT services, rental light equipment, ground handling services), food & consumer goods ( e.g. smoked fish, foie gras and spreadables ; biscuits and snacks; ice-cream; coffee machines; eyewear), industry ( e.g . building materials, packaging, automotive and chemicals), healthcare and retail & distribution (e.g. apparel, automotive fast-fit services, duty-free shops); - for bcIMC : investments on behalf of public sector clients in fixed income, mortgages, public and private equity, real estate, infrastructure and renewable resources; - for Refresco : manufacture of fruit juices, soft drinks and mineral waters. Refresco also packs beer, cide r and some alcoholic mix drinks in cans as well as some carbonated alcoholic drinks in PET . 3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5 ( b ) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 . 4 4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1 )( b) of the Merger Regulation and Article 57 of the EEA Agreement . For the Commission (S igned )
Johannes LAITENBERGER Director - General
(1)
OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ( the ' Merger Regulation ' ). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( ' TFEU ' ) has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of ' Community ' by ' Union ' and ' common market ' by ' internal market ' . The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.
(2) OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3 ( the ' EEA Agreement ' ).
(3) Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 33 , 30 . 1 . 2018 , p. 22 .
(4)
OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5 .
[4910-13-Pj



## • ~TlN<;. YMlIOL 

## I DATE

ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department ofTranspOIiation Airplanes Federal Aviation Administration DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

RTN2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model BD-700-1 Al0and BD-700-1A 11

SUMMARY: We arc adopting anew ainvorthiness directive (AD) forthe products list 

### (v(r [Docket No. FAA-2010-0959; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-1l9-AD; Amendmen OUTlN(;"-MB(}l 

# 1&50'7 --Z011-ol-/O - 39-*****- AD 2{Ii1j-**-**1 IN!TlALSisrG 

# , ;tJIi L'V1~ OATE 

# 12/17// U ROUTINGS,'t-'"OL 

# -{ 14CFR Part 39

(DOT). above. This AD results from mandatory continuing ailworthiness infonnation (MeAl) originated by an aviation authority ofanother country to identify and COITect an unsafe 

### ~"".,,>, ---- condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe condition as: There have been two in-serv"icereports ofmain landing gear (MLG) tire failure on landing, during which aflailing tire tread caused damage to No.2 andNo.3 hydraulic system lines inthe wing auxiliary spar area on the left side ofthe aircraft. This damage resulted inthe loss ofsupply pressure to the inboard and outboard brakes, as the only remaining braking source available was tbe No.3 hydraulic system accumulator. The degradation ofthe brake system performance could adversely affect the aircraft during landing. 

### ~""">. ---- 

## * * * * * * * The unsafe condition is loss ofbraking capability, which could reduce the ability oftbe 

### ~o"n'-,

_ flightcrew to safely land the airplane. We are issuing this AD torequire actions tocone".L

_
§ 3485.310 What must I do if a Federal agency excludes a person with whom I am already doing business in a covered transaction? ( a ) You as a participant may continue covered transactions with an excluded person if the transactions were in existence when the agency excluded the person. However, you are not required to continue the transactions, and you may consider termination. You should make a decision about whether to terminate and the type of termination action, if any, only after a thorough review to ensure that the action is proper and appropriate.
( b ) You may not renew or extend covered transactions (other than no-cost time extensions) with any excluded person, unless another Federal agency responsible for the transaction grants an exception under § 180.135 of this title or ED grants an exception under § 3485.137.
( c ) If you are a title IV, HEA participant, you may not continue a title IV, HEA transaction with an excluded person after the effective date of the exclusion unless permitted by 34 CFR 668.26, 682.702, or 668.94, as applicable.
(Authority: E.O. 12549 (3 CFR 1986 Comp., p. 189); E.O. 12689 (3 CFR 1989 Comp., p. 235); sec. 2455, Pub. L. 103-355, 108 Stat. 3327 (31 U.S.C. 6101 note); 20 U.S.C. 1082, 1094, 1221e-3, and 3474)
§ 182.1320 Glycerin. ( a ) *Product.* Glycerin.
( b ) *Conditions of use.* This substance is generally recognized as safe when used in accordance with good manufacturing practice.
p130077.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 13-0077 Focus Ready Draft 11/19/2012

ENGINEER: Choudhary \ AH PV (kg/yr):

SUBMITTER:

Page 1p130077.eng

SAT (concerns) (11/09/2012): Migration to groundwater: Negligible PBT rating: P1B1T1

Health: 2 Dermal, Inhalation Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 1ppb, amide SAR), XB Testing (Testing desired)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1D

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

Page 2p130077.eng

Page 3p130077.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 13-0077

Page 4p130077.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 13-0077

Page 5p130077.eng

Page 6p130077.eng

Page 7
B IN THE SUPR.EME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
CESARMACIEL, Appellant, vs. ESMERALDAMENDEZ. Respondent. No. 85366 

# ILE OCT 20 2022

ORDER DISMISSINGAPPEAL This appeal was docketed on Septenaber 19, 2022, without payment of the requisite filing fee. See NRAP 3(e). That same day, this court issued a notice directing appellant to pay the required filing fee or demonstrate compliance with NRAP 24 within 14 days. The notice advised that failure to comply would result in the dismissalofthis appeal. To date, appellant has not pai.d the filing fee or otherwise responded to this court's notice. Accordingly, this appealis dismissed. See NRAP 3(a)(2).

It is so ORDERED. CLERKOFTHE SUPREME COURT ELIZABETH A.BROWN BY: Jrcc: Hon. Nadin Cutter, District Judge, Family Court Division Cesar Maciel Esmeralda 11 Mendez Eighth District Court Clerk.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA CLERK'S ORDER 1947 

# 22-
#### Elba Macias AGUILAR, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-70912.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 11, 2005.*

Decided Oct. 21, 2005.

Enrique Ramirez, Esq., Law Office of Enrique Ramirez, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration *&*Naturalization Service, Lagu-na Niguel, CA, Alison Marie Igoe, DOJ— U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: T.G. NELSON, WARDLAW, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Elba Macias Aguilar is a native and citizen of Mexico. Aguilar petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision, which affirmed the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) order denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252.

Where, as here, the BIA made an independent determination of whether relief is appropriate, this Court reviews the deci*553sion of the BIA. *See Molino-Morales v. INS,*237 F.3d 1048, 1050 (9th Cir.2001). We review for substantial evidence, *Nagoulko v. INS,*333 F.3d 1012, 1015 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny this petition for review.

The only issue that Aguilar contests is the BIA’s finding that she did not suffer past persecution. Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s denial of asylum because Aguilar’s sexual harassment problems, her subsequent job transfer, and her son’s disappearances from school did not rise to the level of past persecution. *See Prasad v. INS,*47 F.3d 336, 339-40 (9th Cir.1995); *see also Nagoulko,*333 F.3d at 1016 (holding that incidents of discrimination and harassment do not compel a finding of past persecution).

Because Aguilar did not establish eligibility for asylum, it follows that she did not satisfy the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. *See Alvarez-Santos v. INS,*332 F.3d 1245, 1255 (9th Cir. 2003).

Aguilar waived any challenge to the IJ’s denial of CAT relief because she did not raise this claim in her opening brief. *See Martinez-Serrano v. INS,*94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996)

The voluntary departure period was stayed, and that stay will expire upon issuance of the mandate. *See Desta v. Ashcroft,*365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Innova
Corporation Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 1998 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,613,089
<SECURITIES>                                15,594,932
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,971,216
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (247,198)
<INVENTORY>                                 15,829,715
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            47,167,486
<PP&E>                                      17,898,191
<DEPRECIATION>                             (4,560,429)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              60,910,991
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,074,674
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    86,774,164
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,009,602
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                60,910,991
<SALES>                                     14,748,853
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,748,853
<CGS>                                        9,785,522
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,785,522
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,508,151
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              51,031
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,664,470
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,664,470
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                      140,000
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,804,470
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.8



AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO TO
THE COCA-COLA COMPANY SEVERANCE PAY PLAN
(as Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2012)


THIS AMENDMENT to The Coca-Cola Company Severance pay Plan (the "Plan") is adopted by The Coca-Cola Company Benefits Committee (the "Committee").


W I T N E S S E T H:


WHEREAS, Section 6.1 of the Plan provides that the Committee may amend the Plan at any time; and


WHEREAS, the Committee wishes to amend the Plan.


NOW, THEREFORE, the Committee hereby amends the Plan as follows, effective as of April 1, 2017:


1.


The definition of Qualifying Event shall be amended as follows:


"Qualifying Event" means any event that results in the involuntary
loss of active employment for reasons other than poor performance or for
Cause.  In addition, a Qualifying Event shall not include a seasonal layoff or 
voluntary reduction in hours."


2.


The existing section 3.1(b) shall be deleted in its entirety and shall be replaced with the following language:


"3.1(b)    [Intentionally Omitted]"


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Committee has adopted this Amendment on the date shown below, but effective as of the dates indicated above. 




        
        
	
	
	The Coca-Cola Company Benefits Committee

	 

	By  /s/ Joseph Pitra, Chairman

	      Joseph Pitra, Chairman

	 

	Date 3-10-2017