alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2018174EN.01003801.xml

| 10.7.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 174/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.7.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 174/38

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/683 of 4 May 2018 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of certain pneumatic tyres, new or retreaded, of rubber, of a kind used for buses or lorries, with a load index exceeding 121 originating in the People's Republic of China, and amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/163

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 116 of 7 May 2018
  )

On page 20, recital 119:

for:

‘With respect to one subsidiary of the Aeolus Group, (Pirelli Tyre Co., Ltd), the Commission did not receive within the set deadline the necessary data to establish the export price. On 23 March 2018 the Commission informed the company that questionnaires provided by its related importers were incomplete and it was requested to revise and re-submit the questionnaires replies. The company was informed that failing to provide complete and accurate information within the given deadline, the Commission could revert to the use of facts available in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation. On 4 April 2018 the company in question provided revised replies. However, the Commission considered them still to be incomplete and could not therefore be processed for the purpose of the dumping and injury analysis. As a result, the Commission has established the dumping margin based on the information verified from the other verified companies of the Aeolus Group, namely Aeolus Tyre and Chonche Auto Double Happiness Tyre. The Aeolus Group was invited to update the data concerning Pirelli for the remainder of the proceeding.’,

read:

‘With respect to Pirelli Tyre Co., Ltd, the Commission did not receive within the set deadline the necessary data to establish the export price. On 23 March 2018 the Commission informed the company that questionnaires provided by its related importers were incomplete and it was requested to revise and re-submit the questionnaires replies. The company was informed that failing to provide complete and accurate information within the given deadline, the Commission could revert to the use of facts available in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation. On 4 April 2018 the company in question provided revised replies. However, the Commission considered them still to be incomplete and could not therefore be processed for the purpose of the dumping and injury analysis. As a result, the Commission has established the dumping margin based on the information verified from the other verified companies of the Aeolus Group, namely Aeolus Tyre and Chonche Auto Double Happiness Tyre. The Aeolus Group was invited to update the data concerning Pirelli for the remainder of the proceeding.’;

on page 45, in the Annex:

for:

| ‘Quindao GRT Rubber Co. Ltd | C350 ’ |
| --- | --- |

‘Quindao GRT Rubber Co. Ltd

C350 ’

read:

| ‘Qingdao GRT Rubber Co., Ltd | C350 ’ |
| --- | --- |

‘Qingdao GRT Rubber Co., Ltd

C350 ’

---
§ 1311.50 Requirements for recipients of digitally signed orders. ( a ) The recipient of a digitally signed order must do the following before filling the order: ( 1 ) Verify the integrity of the signature and the order by having the system validate the order.
( 2 ) Verify that the certificate holder's CSOS digital certificate has not expired by checking the expiration date against the date the order was signed.
( 3 ) Check the validity of the certificate holder's certificate by checking the Certificate Revocation List.
( 4 ) Check the certificate extension data to determine whether the sender has the authority to order the controlled substance.
( b ) A recipient may cache Certificate Revocation Lists for use until they expire.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 930 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 930

   Recognizing and honoring York for his role in the Lewis and Clark 
                              Expedition.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 20, 2006

 Mr. Thompson of Mississippi submitted the following resolution; which 
           was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Recognizing and honoring York for his role in the Lewis and Clark 
                              Expedition.

Whereas in 1804, Captain Meriwether Lewis, Captain William Clark, and a band of 
        32 men and 1 woman became the first Americans to explore the lands 
        acquired in the Louisiana Purchase;
Whereas among the explorers was an African American who is known only as William 
        Clark's slave, York;
Whereas York played an integral role in the success of the mission, including 
        hunting, gathering wood, and participating in all the tasks necessary to 
        the success of the expedition;
Whereas York's contribution to the expedition led to Clark naming ``York's 8 
        Islands'' and ``York's Dry River'' after him;
Whereas York was the only member of the expedition who was not awarded land or 
        pay upon return;
Whereas upon return, York was returned to the degradation and captivity of 
        slavery; and
Whereas this year the Nation celebrates the bicentennial of the Lewis and Clark 
        Expedition: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives--
            (1) honors York for his contributions to the Lewis and 
        Clark Expedition;
            (2) recognizes York as the first African American to 
        explore the lands acquired in the Louisiana Purchase;
            (3) urges students of American history to study the 
        regrettably often overlooked role of York in the Lewis and 
        Clark Expedition.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Shelagh Bone Hunter, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of SBH ASSOCIATES, INC. (the "Company"), certify that:  1 I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of SBH ASSOCIATES, INC.;  2 Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3 Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4 I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and  5. I, as the certifying officer have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  Date: May 15, 2014 By: /s/ SHELAGH BONE HUNTER Shelagh Bone Hunter Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
Editorial Note on Part 14
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 14 appear at 88 FR 45065, July 14, 2023.

§ 14.142 Functions of a color additive advisory committee. ( a ) A color additive advisory committee reviews all available information relating to the matter referred to it, including all information contained in any pertinent color additive petition and in FDA files. All information reviewed is placed on public display and is available for review at the office of the Dockets Management Staff.
( b ) The Commissioner specifies to the color additive advisory committee, in writing, the issues on which review and recommendations are requested.
( c ) The date of the first meeting of a color additive advisory committee, following receipt of the administrative record by each of the committee members, is designated as the beginning of the period allowed for consideration of the matter by the committee. Within 60 days after the first meeting, unless the time is extended as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, the Chairperson of the committee shall certify to the Commissioner the report containing the recommendations of the committee, including any minority report. The report states the recommendations of the committee and the reasons or basis for them. The report includes copies of all material considered by the committee in addition to the administrative record furnished to it.
( d ) If the Chairperson concludes that the color additive advisory committee needs additional time, the Chairperson shall so inform the Commissioner in writing and may certify the report of the committee to the Commissioner within 90 days instead of 60 days.
( e ) More than one matter may be handled concurrently by a color additive advisory committee.
Exhibit 21


                                SUBSIDIARIES



Domestic Subsidiaries of the Company:


   Name of Subsidiary                         State of Incorporation

   PVI Acquisition Corp.                             Delaware

   PCT International, Inc.                           Delaware

   Flavors Holdings, Inc.                            Delaware

   Pneumo Abex Corporation                           Delaware

   Concord Pacific Corporation                       Maine

   EVD Holdings Inc.                                 Delaware

   Jensen-Kelly Corporation                          Delaware

Foreign Subsidiaries of the Company:

   Name of Subsidiary                                Jurisdiction

   Mafco Establishment                               Liechtenstein

   EVD Holdings S.A.                                 France

   Extraits Vegetaux Et Derives, S.A.                France

   Xianyang Concord Natural Products Co. Ltd.        Peoples Rep. of China

   Mafco Weihai Green Industry of Science and
     Technology Co. Ltd. (50% owned)                 Peoples Rep. of China

   Rishmac Produce & Export Co. (45% owned)          Iran

   Boam Produce (Europe) Est. (45% owned)            Liechtenstein
[No. 39451-7-I.

Division One.

November 17, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. William Dowdell, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 96-1-01210-2, Joan E. DuBuque, J., entered September 3, 1996. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
SERVED: OCTOBER 15, 2014 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF JOSEPH TERRELL BROWN DOCKETNO. FAA-2014-0690 (Civil Penalty Action)
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2014WP050026) has been assigned to Administrative LawJudge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served onthe Judge, the FAAHearing Docket, and the otherpersons onthe attached Service List.

Attachment

- Service ListSERVICE LIST - BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal AviationAdministration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl0001

Joseph Terrell Brown, Respondent 3370 Adriatic Avenue #2A Long Beach, CA 90810 TEL: 562-338-4553 (cell) FAX: 562-208-3793 (home) ONE COPY

Aneesah Cleveland, Respondent'sRepresentative 3370 Adriatic Avenue #2A Long Beach, CA 90810 TEL: 562-338-4553 (cell) 562-208-3793 (home) Lierre Green, Complainant's Counsel Office oftheRegional Counsel, APW-7.6 Federal AviationAdministration Western-Pacific Region P.O. Box 92007 Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 TEL: 310-725-7117 FAX: 310-725-6816 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,AdministratiVe LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2014-0690 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 2
AMENDMENT
#1 TO CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT


 


THIS
Amendment to the CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is effective as of the 24th day of April, 2017
between QUEST SOLUTION, INC., a Delaware corporation (“QSI”) and JOEY TROMBINO, an individual
(“Contractor”);


 


WHEREAS,
QSI and contractor have entered into that certain Contractor Agreement dated as of October 1, 2016(the “Agreement”)


 


WHEREAS,
the Contractor will cease to be an employee of Quest Solution Canada Inc., which has changed its corporate name to QSG Inc., effective
April 30, 2017; and


 


WHEREAS,
Contractor desires to continue to provide those Chief Financial Officer services to QSI on a contract basis, and QSI desires Contractor
to so provide them; and


 


WHEREAS,
QSI and Contractor acknowledge that Contractor shall, provide services to QSI as Chief Financial Officer which relationship will
be exclusively as an independent contractor of QSI, not as an employee; and


 


WHEREAS,
QSI and Contractor desire to amend the Agreement pursuant to Article 4 Section 4.3 as described herein;


 


NOW
THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, QSI and Contractor
agree as follows:


 


1.           The
provision of services provision as stipulated in Article 1 section 1.1 is hereby amended in that the Contractor will be allocating
100% of his working time effective May 1, 2017 to QSI instead of 75% which had been provided in the Agreement.


  


2.           The term as stipulated in Article 2 section 2.1 is hereby amended by replacing September 30, 2017 therein with December 31, 2017.


 


3.           The fees for services in Article 3 Section 3.1 (a) (i) shall read a monthly payment due on the first day of each month in advance for an amount of $13,000 USD commencing on May 1, 2017 through the full term of this Amendment.


 


4.          
The additional fee for services in Article 3 Section 3.1 (a) (ii) shall read a the Contractor shall be eligible for an additional
fee in the aggregate amount of $34,000, payable in cash or common stock of QSI (as solely determined by QSI), fifty percent (50%)
of which would be payable on September 30, 2017 and the remaining fifty (50%) would be payable December 31, 2017. The criteria
for the payment of the additional fee shall be reestablished within 30 days from the signing of the Amendment.


  


5.           QSI shall pay Contractor $8,100 in cash in three equal monthly installments of $2,700 starting May 1, 2017 and issue 70,000 shares of its restricted common stock on the date this Amendment is signed and delivered in additional fees as the Contractor has achieved the objective of the first installment set forth in Article 3 Section 3.1 (a) (ii) of the Agreement.



 




    	 



    	 		 



    

 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF each of the undersigned has caused this Amendment to be duly executed and delivered by its proper and duly authorized
officer as of the date set forth above.


 


	 	/s/
    JOEY TROMBINO
	 	JOEY
    TROMBINO




 


	 	QUEST
    SOLUTION, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Shai S. Lustgarten
	 	 	 
	 	Title:	CEO







 







    	 	2
SCWC-11-0000605

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

EICHI OKI, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-11-0000605; CASE NO. 1DTI-11-047379)

ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Pollack JJ., and

Circuit Judge To#oto#o, in place of Acoba, J., recused)

Upon consideration of petitioner/defendant-appellant

Eichi Oki’s application for writ of certiorari, it appears that

Oki’s application was initially due on November 27, 2013, which

was 30 days after the Intermediate Court of Appeals’ October 28,

2013 judgment. Hawai#i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 602-59(c) (Supp.

2012); Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule

40.1(a)(1) (2013). It further appears that Oki requested and

received an extension of time, which extended the deadline for

filing his application for writ of certiorari an additional 30

days, to December 27, 2013. HRS § 602-59(c); HRAP Rule

40.1(a)(3) (2013).

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-11-0000605

22-JAN-2014

09:51 AM
Oki’s application was filed on December 30, 2013. The

application is untimely and thus, this court lacks appellate

jurisdiction. Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the application for writ of

certiorari is dismissed.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, January 22, 2014.

Ann C. Kemp 

for petitioner

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Fa#auuga To#oto#o

2
1

 The Honorable Norman H. Stahl, United States Circuit Judge for the First

Circuit, sitting by designation.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 01-1736

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Western

* District of Missouri.

Sharon L. Wood, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

*

___________

Submitted: November 14, 2001

 Filed: November 27, 2001

___________

Before BOWMAN, JOHN R. GIBSON and STAHL,1

 Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Sharon Wood pled guilty, without a plea agreement, to two counts of a

multicount indictment for conspiracy to distribute cocaine, and aiding and abetting

the distribution of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 & 846. At her sentencing,

Wood objected to the calculation in the presentence investigation report regarding the

amount of drugs for which she should be held responsible and objected to the
2

 The Honorable Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr., United States District Judge for the

Western District of Missouri.

-2-

presentation of any evidence regarding drug quantity, insisting that the government

was estopped from attributing to her any drugs deriving from transactions for which

it had not held a codefendant, Calvin Powell, responsible in its plea agreement with

him. The District Court2

 rejected her argument, and after an evidentiary hearing,

determined that she was responsible for 73.90 grams of cocaine. Wood was

sentenced to five months of incarceration and five months of home detention.

 The District Court properly rejected Defendant's argument, which we agree

was meritless. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

 ATTEST:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 5.1

                    [Letterhead of Preston Gates & Ellis LLP]

                                  July 23, 1997



SeaMED Corporation
14500 Northeast 87th Street
Redmond, Washington 98052-3431

      Re:   Registration Statement on Form S-8 of SeaMED Corporation;
            SeaMED Corporation 1988 Stock Option Plan

Ladies and Gentlemen:

      We have acted as counsel to SeaMED Corporation (the "Company") in
connection with the filing of the above-referenced Registration Statement (the
"Registration Statement") relating to the registration of 680,000 shares (the
"Shares") of Common Stock, no par value per share, of the Company issuable under
the Company's 1988 Stock Option Plan. In connection therewith, we have reviewed
the Company's Articles of Incorporation, Bylaws, minutes of appropriate
meetings, a copy of the Plan and such other matters we deemed appropriate.

      Based on that review, it is our opinion that the Shares will be, when sold
pursuant to the terms contemplated by the Registration Statement, validly
issued, fully paid and non-assessable under the Washington Business Corporation
Act.

      We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement and to all references to our firm included in or made a
part of the Registration Statement.


                                    Very truly yours,

                                    PRESTON GATES & ELLIS LLP

                                    /s/ Mark R. Beatty

                                    By
                                      Mark R. Beatty