Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 4 / Thursday, January 6, 2011 / Notices 797 

CONNECTICUT 

Hartford County 

Spring Grove Cemetery, 2035 Main St, 

Hartford, 10001158 

IDAHO 

Valley County 

Landmark Ranger Station, Boise National 

Forest, Cascade, 10001179 

LOUISIANA 

Orleans Parish 

Charity Hospital of New Orleans, 1532 

Tulane Ave, New Orleans, 10001173 

MARYLAND 

Anne Arundel County 

Burle’s Town Land, (Providence, MD: 

Archeology of a Puritan—Quaker 

Settlement Near the Severn River MPS) 

Hidden Cove Rd, Annapolis, 10001147 

MASSACHUSETTS 

Franklin County 

Wilder, Homestead, The, Ashfield Rd, 

Buckland, 10001178 

NORTH CAROLINA 

Rowan County 

Eastover, 5510 S Main St, Salisbury, 

10001176 

Stanly County 

Denning, Thomas Marcellus, House, 415 N 

Second St, Albermarle, 10001177 

OREGON 

Multnomah County 

Jacobberger, Joseph, Country House, 5545 SW 

Sweetbriar St, Portland, 10001171 

Wallowa County 

Warnock, William P., House Boundary 

Increase, 501 S Fifth St, Enterprise, 

10001170 

UTAH 

Kane County 

Kanab Post Office, (Kanab, Utah MPS) 22 N 

Main St, Kanab, 10001175 

Millard County 

Fillmore American Legion Hall, 80 S Main 

St, Fillmore, 10001174 

Salt Lake County 

Pacific Northwest Pipeline Building, 315 E 

200 S, Salt Lake City, 10001159 

WYOMING 

Converse County 

Huxtable Ranch, The, (Ranches, Farms, and 

Homesteads in Wyoming, 1860–1960 MPS) 

1351 Box Elder Rd, Glenrock, 10001172 

Other Actions: Request for Removal has 

been made for the following resources: 

ARKANSAS 

Pulaski County 

Hopkins—Grace House, 1310 S Summit St, 

Little Rock, 99000764 

Young House, 436 Skyline Drive, North Little 

Rock, 92000559 

[FR Doc. 2011–59 Filed 1–5–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4312–51–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

Notice of Receipt of Complaint; 

Solicitation of Comments Relating to 

the Public Interest 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has received a complaint 

entitled In Re Certain Birthing 

Simulators and Associated Systems, DN 

2778; the Commission is soliciting 

comments on any public interest issues 

raised by the complaint. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the 

Commission, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

205–2000. The public version of the 

complaint can be accessed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov, and will be 

available for inspection during official 

business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) 

in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its Internet server (http:// 

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

this investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. Hearingimpaired persons are advised that 

information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 

205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission has received a complaint 

filed on behalf of Gaumard Scientific 

Company, Inc. on December 30, 2010. 

The complaint alleges violations of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 

U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

and the sale within the United States 

after importation of certain birthing 

simulators and associated systems. The 

complaint names as respondents 

Shanghai Honglian Medical Instrument 

Development Co., Ltd. of Shanghai, 

China and Shanghai Evenk International 

Trading Co., Ltd. of Shanghai, China. 

The complainant, proposed 

respondents, other interested parties, 

and members of the public are invited 

to file comments, not to exceed five 

pages in length, on any public interest 

issues raised by the complaint. 

Comments should address whether 

issuance of an exclusion order and/or a 

cease and desist order in this 

investigation would negatively affect the 

public health and welfare in the United 

States, competitive conditions in the 

United States economy, the production 

of like or directly competitive articles in 

the United States, or United States 

consumers. 

In particular, the Commission is 

interested in comments that: 

(i) Explain how the articles 

potentially subject to the orders are used 

in the United States; 

(ii) Identify any public health, safety, 

or welfare concerns in the United States 

relating to the potential orders; 

(iii) Indicate the extent to which like 

or directly competitive articles are 

produced in the United States or are 

otherwise available in the United States, 

with respect to the articles potentially 

subject to the orders; and 

(iv) Indicate whether Complainant, 

Complainant’s licensees, and/or third 

party suppliers have the capacity to 

replace the volume of articles 

potentially subject to an exclusion order 

and a cease and desist order within a 

commercially reasonable time. 

Written submissions must be filed no 

later than by close of business, five 

business days after the date of 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register. There will be further 

opportunities for comment on the 

public interest after the issuance of any 

final initial determination in this 

investigation. 

Persons filing written submissions 

must file the original document and 12 

true copies thereof on or before the 

deadlines stated above with the Office 

of the Secretary. Submissions should 

refer to the docket number (‘‘Docket No. 

2778’’) in a prominent place on the 

cover page and/or the first page. The 

Commission’s rules authorize filing 

submissions with the Secretary by 

facsimile or electronic means only to the 

extent permitted by section 201.8 of the 

rules (see Handbook for Electronic 

Filing Procedures, http://www.usitc.gov/ 

secretary/fed_reg_notices/rules/ 

documents/ 

handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf). 

Persons with questions regarding 

electronic filing should contact the 

Secretary (202–205–2000). 

Any person desiring to submit a 

document to the Commission in 

confidence must request confidential 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
798 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 4 / Thursday, January 6, 2011 / Notices 

treatment. All such requests should be 

directed to the Secretary to the 

Commission and must include a full 

statement of the reasons why the 

Commission should grant such 

treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents 

for which confidential treatment by the 

Commission is properly sought will be 

treated accordingly. All nonconfidential 

written submissions will be available for 

public inspection at the Office of the 

Secretary. 

This action is taken under the 

authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), 

and of sections 201.10 and 210.50(a)(4) 

of the Commission’s Rules of Practice 

and Procedure (19 CFR 201.10, 

210.50(a)(4)). 

Issued: December 30, 2010. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–33356 Filed 1–5–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–394–A & 399– 

A (Second Review) (Fourth Remand)] 

Ball Bearings From Japan and the 

United Kingdom 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Notice of remand proceedings. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. International Trade 

Commission (‘‘Commission’’) hereby 

gives notice of its fourth remand 

proceeding with respect to its 

affirmative determination in the fiveyear review of the antidumping duty 

order on ball bearings from Japan. For 

further information concerning the 

conduct of this proceeding and rules of 

general application, consult the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, part 201, subparts A through 

E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, 

subpart A (19 CFR part 207). 

DATES: Effective Date: December 30, 

2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

James McClure, Office of Investigations, 

telephone 202–205–3191, or David 

Goldfine, Office of General Counsel, 

telephone 202–708–5452, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436. 

Hearing-impaired persons can obtain 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its Internet server (http:// 

www.usitc.gov). 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background.—On December 9, 2010, 

the Court of International Trade (per 

Judge Barzilay) issued an opinion in 

NSK Corp. et al. v. United States, Slip 

Op. 10–133 (‘‘NSK V’’). In that opinion, 

the Court has again affirmed-in-part and 

remanded-in-part the Commission’s 

determinations in Certain Bearings and 

Parts Thereof from Japan and the 

United Kingdom, Inv. Nos. 731–TA– 

394–A & 399–A (Second Review) (Third 

Remand), USITC Pub. 4194 (Aug. 2010). 

In NSK V, the Court affirmed the 

Commission’s determination not to 

cumulate subject imports from the 

United Kingdom because they would 

not likely have a discernible adverse 

impact. NSK V at 4–6. The Court also 

affirmed the Commission’s negative 

determination with respect to the 

United Kingdom. Id. at 6. 

As to the remaining issues with 

respect to the cumulated subject imports 

from France, Germany, Italy, and Japan, 

the Court again affirmed the 

Commission’s findings that the 

cumulated imports would likely have 

significant volume and price effects. Id. 

at 7. Nevertheless, with respect to the 

likely impact by cumulated subject 

imports, the Court again remanded the 

issue to the Commission. Id. at 8–12. 

Under the remand schedule ordered 

by the Court, the Commission was 

required to file a status report with the 

Court on December 20, 2010, advising 

the Court as to whether it would be reopening the record on the likely impact 

issue. The Court also directed the 

parties to submit a proposed joint 

scheduling order for the fourth remand 

proceedings. 

On December 20, 2010, the 

Commission filed the requested status 

report with the Court, advising the 

Court that it will not be re-opening the 

record. On December 20, 2010, the 

parties also submitted a proposed joint 

scheduling order. On December 22, 

2010, the Court approved the proposed 

scheduling order and directed the 

Commission to file its fourth remand 

determination by March 1, 2011. Under 

the remand schedule ordered by the 

Court, Plaintiffs, Plaintiff-Intervenors, 

and Defendant-Intervenors may file 

their comments with the Court 

regarding the Commission’s fourth 

remand determination by April 1, 2011. 

Participation in the proceeding.— 

Only those persons who were interested 

parties to the reviews (i.e., persons 

listed on the Commission Secretary’s 

service list) and parties to the appeal 

may participate in the remand 

proceeding. Such persons need not 

make any additional filings with the 

Commission to participate in the 

remand proceeding, unless they are 

adding new individuals to the list of 

persons entitled to receive business 

proprietary information under 

administrative protective order. 

Business proprietary information (‘‘BPI’’) 

referred to during the remand 

proceeding will be governed, as 

appropriate, by the administrative 

protective order issued in the reviews. 

Written submissions.—The 

Commission is not re-opening the 

record in this remand proceeding. The 

Commission will permit the parties to 

file comments pertaining to the specific 

issues that are the subject of the Court’s 

remand instructions. Comments should 

be limited to no more than fifteen (15) 

double-spaced and single-sided pages of 

textual material. No appendices or other 

attachments are allowed. The parties 

may not themselves submit any new 

factual information in their comments 

and may not address any issue other 

than those that are the subject of the 

Court’s remand instructions. Any such 

comments must be filed with the 

Commission no later than January 14, 

2011. 

All written submissions must conform 

with the provisions of section 201.8 of 

the Commission’s rules; any 

submissions that contain BPI must also 

conform with the requirements of 

sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the 

Commission’s rules. The Commission’s 

rules do not authorize filing of 

submissions with the Secretary by 

facsimile or electronic means, except to 

the extent permitted by section 201.8 of 

the Commission’s rules, as amended, 67 

Fed. Reg. 68036 (Nov. 8, 2002). 

In accordance with sections 201.16(c) 

and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, 

each document filed by a party to the 

investigation must be served on all other 

parties to the investigation (as identified 

by either the public or BPI service list), 

and a certificate of service must be 

timely filed. The Secretary will not 

accept a document for filing without a 

certificate of service. 

Parties are also advised to consult 

with the Commission’s Rules of Practice 

and Procedure, part 201, subparts A 

through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 

207, subpart A (19 CFR part 207) for 

provisions of general applicability 

concerning written submissions to the 

Commission. 

By order of the Commission. 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES