alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 356 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 356

 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Senate 
     should give its advice and consent to the ratification of the 
 Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against 
                                 Women.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 24, 2017

 Mrs. Carolyn B. Maloney of New York (for herself and Ms. Schakowsky) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                           on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Senate 
     should give its advice and consent to the ratification of the 
 Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against 
                                 Women.

    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives 
that--
            (1) the full realization of the rights of women is vital to 
        the development and well-being of people of all nations; and
            (2) the Senate should, therefore, give its advice and 
        consent to the ratification of the Convention on the 
        Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>


                                   EXHIBIT 21.1


                               LEVEL 8 SYSTEMS, INC.
                               LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES


DOMESTIC COMPANIES

Parent Company:

       Level 8 Systems, Inc.

       Date of Incorporation:       07/07/88
       State of Incorporation:      New York

Subsidiary:

       SEER Technologies, Inc.

       Date of Incorporation:       03/06/90
       State of Incorporation:      Delaware

       Level 8 Technologies, Inc.

       Date of Incorporation:       02/24/94
       State of Incorporation:      New York

       SEER Technologies (Worldwide Holdings) Limited

       Date of Incorporation:       02/26/92
       State of Incorporation:      Delaware

       ProfitKey International, Inc.

       Date of Incorporation:       05/17/85
       State of Incorporation:      Delaware

       Momentum Software Corporation

       Date of Incorporation:       03/27/90
       State of Incorporation:      Delaware

       Transfer Flow, Inc.

       Date of Incorporation:       12/11/95
       State of Incorporation:      Delaware

<PAGE>

FOREIGN SUBSIDIARIES

Argentina:

       SEER Technologies de Argentine S.A.

       Date of Incorporation:       09/20/96

Australia:

       SEER Technologies Australia Pty Limited

       Date of Registration:        08/09/93

Barbados:

       SEER Technologies FSC, Inc.

       Date of Registration:        12/27/95

Benelux:

       Seer Technologies Benelux B.V.

       Date of Registration:        09/25/92

Brazil:

       SEER Technologies do Brazil Ltda.

       Date of Registration:        12/09/93

Canada:

       SEER Technologies Canada, Inc.

       Domestic Province:           Ontario
       Date of Registration:        05/18/94

       3020126 Canada Inc.

       Domestic Province:           Canada
       Date of Registration:        10/28/94

Denmark:

       SEER Technologies Denmark ApS

       Date of Registration:        04/01/94

<PAGE>


France:

       SEER Technologies France S.A.R.L.

       Date of Incorporation:       06/09/95

Germany:

       SEER Technologies Europe (Deutschland) GmbH

       Date of Registration:        11/19/92

Ireland:

       SEER Technologies Ireland Limited

       Date of Registration:        03/11/95

Italy:

       SEER Technologies Italia S.r.L.

       Date of Registration:        08/07/92

Mexico:

       SEER Technologies de Mexico S.A. de C.V.

       Date of Registration:        11/08/95

Korea:

       SEER Korea Co., Limited

       Date of Registration:        07/07/97

Sweden:

       SEER Technologies Nordic AB

       Date of Registration:        07/09/92

Spain:

       SEER Technologies Espana, S.L.

       Date of Registration:        07/22/93

United Kingdom:

       SEER Technologies (U.K.) Limited

       Date of Registration:        01/07/92

<PAGE>

       Momentum Software (Europe) Limited

       Date of Incorporation:       03/17/95
       State of Incorporation:      United Kingdom
§ 169.176 Concentrated vanilla extract. ( a ) Concentrated vanilla extract conforms to the definition and standard of identity and is subject to any requirement for label statement of ingredients prescribed for vanilla extract by § 169.175, except that it is concentrated to remove part of the solvent, and each gallon contains two or more units of vanilla constituent as defined in § 169.3(c). The content of ethyl alcohol is not less than 35 percent by volume.
( b ) The specified name of the food is “Concentrated vanilla extract __-fold” or “__-fold concentrated vanilla extract”, the blank being filled in with the whole number (disregarding fractions) expressing the number of units of vanilla constituent per gallon of the article. (For example, “Concentrated vanilla extract 2-fold”.)
[42 FR 14479, Mar. 15, 1977, as amended at 58 FR 2886, Jan. 6, 1993]
§ 415.14 Simplification, consolidation, or substitution of State plans. ( a ) As used in this section: ( 1 ) Simplify means that a State may develop its own format, choose its own submission date, and select the planning period for a State plan.
( 2 ) Consolidate means that a State may meet statutory and regulatory requirements by combining two or more plans into one document and that the State can select the format, submission date, and the planning period for the consolidated plan.
( 3 ) Substitute means that a State may use a plan or other document that it has developed for its own purposes to meet Federal requirements.
( b ) If not inconsistent with law, a State may decide to try to simplify, consolidate, or substitute Federally required State plans without prior approval by the Secretary.
( c ) The Secretary reviews each State plan a State has simplified, consolidated or substituted and accepts the plan only if its contents meet Federal requirements.
# m8772.docx

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 20.3.2018 C(2018) 1846 final To the notifying parties: Subject : Case M. 8772 - BOREALIS / NOVA CHEMICALS / TOTAL / JV Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 1 and Article 57 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area 2 Dear Sir or Madam, 1. On 23 February 2018 , the European Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which Borealis AG ( "Borealis", Austria), jointly controlled by Mubadala Investment Company (" Mubadala ", Abu Dhabi) and OMV AG (Austria), NOVA Chemicals Inc ("NOVA", USA ), a wholly owned subsidiary of NOVA Chemicals Corporation ("NOVA Corporation", Canada), wholly owned by Mubadala , and Total Petrochemicals & Refining USA ( "Total", USA ) , a wholly ow ned subsidiary of Total S.A. ("Total S.A. " , France) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control over Bayport Polymers LLC, ( the "JV", USA ) by way of purchase of shares . 3 2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are: - for undertaking Borealis : production and commercialisation of polyolefin, base chemicals and fertilizers, - for undertaking NOVA : production and marketing of ethylene, polyethylene, styrene and co-products thereof, - for undertaking Total : engaged in the oil and gas industry and other energy sectors, - for the JV: production and marketing of polyethylene in the US . 3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5 ( a ) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 . 4 4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation and Article 57 of the EEA Agreement . For the Commission (Signed) Johannes LAITENBERGER Director - General
(1)
OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ( the ' Merger Regulation ' ). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( ' TFEU ' ) has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of ' Community ' by ' Union ' and ' common market ' by ' internal market ' . The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.
(2) OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3 ( the ' EEA Agreement ' ).
(3) Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 8 2 , 5.03.2018 , p. 4 .
(4)
OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5 .
#### In the Matter of Irma Rodriguez, Respondent, v Richard A. Izzo, Appellant, and Susan L. Hurowitz et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding, *inter alia,*to invalidate a petition designating Richard Izzo as a candidate in the Democratic Party primary election to be held on September 9, 1980 for the public office of Representative to the United States Congress from the 14th Congressional District, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 21, 1980 which granted the application. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, proceeding dismissed and the board of elections is directed to place the name of Richard Izzo on the appropriate ballot. There was insufficient evidence to support Special Term’s finding that the designating petition was permeated by fraud. The testimony of 12 signatories on the issue of whether they were requested to, and did in fact, swear that the statements made and subscribed by them on the designating petition were true was insufficient to warrant the invalidation of the 984 signatures obtained by the three commissioners of deeds, Steven Izzo, Richard Izzo and James G. Fennessy. Under these circumstances, sufficient valid signatures remain so as to require the validation of the designating petition. Mollen, P. J., Damiani, Mangano and Gulotta, JJ., concur.
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS53936 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 210 (Tuesday, October 30, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 65686]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-26614]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES

Economic Impact Policy

    This notice is to inform the public that the Export-Import Bank of 
the United States has received an application for a $14 million loan 
guarantee to support the export of approximately $13 million worth of 
gas turbine generator set and services to Russia. The U.S. exports will 
enable the Russian company to produce approximately 475,000 cubic 
meters of medium density fiberboard per year. Available information 
indicates that the majority of this new medium density fiberboard 
production will be sold in Russia with the remainder sold in the 
Ukraine and other CIS countries. Interested parties may submit comments 
on this transaction by email to economic.impact@exim.gov or by mail to 
811 Vermont Avenue NW., Room 442, Washington, DC 20571, within 14 days 
of the date this notice appears in the Federal Register, inclusive of 
the date of this notification.

Kathryn Hoff-Patrinos,
Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2012-26614 Filed 10-29-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
```
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1087 

To ensure America’s law enforcement officers have access to lifesaving equipment needed to defend themselves and civilians from attacks by terrorists 

and violent criminals. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 10, 2017 

Mr. TOOMEY (for himself and Mr. BLUNT) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To ensure America’s law enforcement officers have access 

to lifesaving equipment needed to defend themselves and 

civilians from attacks by terrorists and violent criminals. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Lifesaving Gear for 

5 Police Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. STATE AND LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT ACCESS TO 

7 LIFESAVING FEDERAL EQUIPMENT. 

8 (a) UNENFORCEABILITY OF CERTAIN REGULATIONS

9 UNLESS ENACTED INTO LAW.— 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1087 IS

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—No regulation, rule, guid2 ance, policy, or recommendations issued on or after 

3 May 15, 2015, that limits the sale or donation of 

4 property of the Federal Government, including ex5 cess property of the Department of Defense, to 

6 State and local agencies for law enforcement activi7 ties (whether pursuant to section 2576a of title 10, 

8 United States Code, or any other provision of law, 

9 or as a condition on the use of Federal funds) shall 

10 have any force or effect after the date of the enact11 ment of this Act unless enacted into law by Con12 gress. 

13 (2) PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS TO EN14 FORCE REGULATIONS.—No agency or instrumen15 tality of the Federal Government may use any Fed16 eral funds, fees, or resources to implement or carry 

17 out a regulation, rule, guidance, policy, or rec18 ommendation issued as described in subsection (a) 

19 that is not enacted into law by Congress. 

20 (b) RETURN OR REISSUE OF EQUIPMENT RECALLED

21 OR SEIZED PURSUANT TO REGULATIONS.—Any property 

22 recalled or seized on or after May 15, 2015, pursuant to 

23 a regulation, rule, guidance, policy, or recommendation 

24 issued as described in subsection (a) shall be returned, re25 placed, or re-issued to the agency from which recalled or 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1087 IS

1 seized, at no cost to such agency, as soon as practicable 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 791 

Expressing support for the designation of Cesar Chavez’s birthday, March 

31, as National Border Control Day. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 20, 2018 

Mr. GOHMERT submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of Cesar Chavez’s 

birthday, March 31, as National Border Control Day. 

Whereas Cesar Chavez was born on March 31, 1927, in 

Yuma, Arizona; 

Whereas the Chavez family lost its home in the Great Depression and moved to California when Cesar was 12; 

Whereas Cesar Chavez left school at age 15 to work full time 

in the fields; 

Whereas Cesar Chavez learned that, as biographer Miraim 

Pawel writes, ‘‘a surplus of labor enabled growers to 

treat workers as little more than interchangeable parts, 

cheaper and easier to replace than machines’’; 

Whereas, in 1962, Cesar Chavez founded the National Farm 

Workers Association, which later became the United 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 791 IH 

Farm Workers (UFW), to improve the wages and working conditions for American farmworkers; 

Whereas Cesar Chavez believed that preventing illegal immigration was an essential prerequisite to improving the circumstances of American farmworkers; 

Whereas, in 1969, Cesar Chavez testified before Congress 

that ‘‘We gave the Immigration and Naturalization Services and the Border Patrol stacks and stacks of information. They did not pull workers out of struck fields. . . 

This is why we are forced to boycott: We have had no 

enforcement by the Border Patrol’’; 

Whereas, in the mid-1970s, Cesar Chavez organized the 

UFW’s ‘‘Illegals Campaign’’ to identify and report illegal 

workers, saying that ‘‘If we can get the illegals out of 

California, we will win the strike overnight.’’; 

Whereas, in 1974, as part of this campaign, Cesar Chavez 

sent a memo to UFW officials announcing ‘‘the beginning of a MASSIVE CAMPAIGN to get the recent flood 

of illegals out of California’’; 

Whereas, in 1979, at a speech before the National Press Club 

in Washington, D.C., Cesar Chavez demanded that the 

Federal Government enforce the immigration laws and 

keep illegal aliens out of the country, adding that, ‘‘if my 

mother was breaking the strike and if she were illegal, I’d 

ask the same thing.’’; and 

Whereas Cesar Chavez devoted his professional life to ensuring that efforts of American workers to bargain for higher wages and better working conditions were not undermined by illegal immigration: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 791 IH 

1 (1) supports the designation of National Border 

2 Control Day; 

3 (2) expresses strong support for Cesar Chavez’s 

4 efforts to educate his fellow Americans about the 

5 harmful effects of illegal immigration; and 

6 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

7 to observe National Border Control Day with appro8 priate ceremonies and activities. 

Æ 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
#### § 1210.27 Permits waiving clauses 2 and 5, section 2 of the Federal Import Milk Act.

A permit to ship or transport raw milk into the United States will contain a waiver of clauses 2 and 5 of section 2 of the Federal Import Milk Act when the shipper is an operator of a creamery or condensery, or is a producer shipping or transporting to a creamery or condensery and the creamery or condensery is located in the United States within a radius of 20 miles of the point of production of such milk, and the milk, prior to its sale, use, or disposal, is pasteurized, condensed, or evaporated.
§ 1311.20 Coordinators for CSOS digital certificate holders. ( a ) Each registrant, regardless of number of digital certificates issued, must designate one or more responsible persons to serve as that registrant's CSOS coordinator regarding issues pertaining to issuance of, revocation of, and changes to digital certificates issued under that registrant's DEA registration. While the coordinator will be the main point of contact between one or more DEA registered locations and the CSOS Certification Authority, all digital certificate activities are the responsibility of the registrant with whom the digital certificate is associated. Even when an individual registrant, *i.e.*, an individual practitioner, is applying for a digital certificate to order controlled substances a CSOS Coordinator must be designated; though in such a case, the individual practitioner may also serve as the coordinator.
( b ) Once designated, coordinators must identify themselves, on a one-time basis, to the Certification Authority. If a designated coordinator changes, the Certification Authority must be notified of the change and the new responsibilities assumed by each of the registrant's coordinators, if applicable. Coordinators must complete the application that the DEA Certification Authority provides and submit the following: ( 1 ) Two copies of identification, one of which must be a government-issued photographic identification.
( 2 ) A copy of each current DEA Certificate of Registration (DEA form 223) for each registered location for which the coordinator will be responsible or, if the applicant (or their employer) has not been issued a DEA registration, a copy of each application for registration of the applicant or the applicant's employer.
( 3 ) The applicant must have the completed application notarized and forward the completed application and accompanying documentation to the DEA Certification Authority.
( c ) Coordinators will communicate with the Certification Authority regarding digital certificate applications, renewals and revocations. For applicants applying for a digital certificate from the DEA Certification Authority, and for applicants applying for a power of attorney digital certificate for a DEA registrant, the registrant's Coordinator must verify the applicant's identity, review the application package, and submit the completed package to the Certification Authority.
### Sedimentation in Brownell Creek subwatershed No. 1, Nebraska

By: J. C. Mundorff

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1798C

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
§ 169.177 Vanilla flavoring. ( a ) Vanilla flavoring conforms to the definition and standard of identity and is subject to any requirement for label statement of ingredients prescribed for vanilla extract by § 169.175, except that its content of ethyl alcohol is less than 35 percent by volume.
( b ) The specified name of the food is “Vanilla flavoring”.
[42 FR 14479, Mar. 15, 1977, as amended at 58 FR 2886, Jan. 6, 1993]