alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1054 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to ensure that electrochromic 

glass qualifies as energy property for purposes of the energy credit. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 4, 2017 

Mr. WICKER (for himself and Mr. MARKEY) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to ensure 

that electrochromic glass qualifies as energy property 

for purposes of the energy credit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Dynamic Glass Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF ELECTROCHROMIC GLASS AS EN6 ERGY PROPERTY. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Clause (i) of section 48(a)(3)(A) 

8 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by in9 serting ‘‘(including use of electrochromic glass)’’ after ‘‘a 

10 structure’’. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1054 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

3 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
§ 1136.1 Purpose of this part. ( a ) This part specifies standard wording of general terms and conditions concerning submission and maintenance of recipient information; records retention and access; remedies for noncompliance and termination; claims, disputes, and appeals; collection of amounts due; closeout; and after-the-award requirements.
( b ) It thereby implements OMB guidance for grants and cooperative agreements in multiple portions of 2 CFR part 200, as those portions apply to general terms and conditions. Specifically, this part implements: ( 1 ) 2 CFR 200.113 and 200.210(b)(1)(iii);
( 2 ) 2 CFR 200.300(b) as it refers to requirements in 2 CFR part 25; and
( 3 ) 2 CFR 200.333 through 200.345.
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 383 

To express support for recognition of June 2017 as National Orca Protection 

Month. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 13, 2017 

Mr. HECK (for himself, Mr. KILMER, Ms. DELBENE, Ms. JAYAPAL, Mr. 

SMITH of Washington, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Ms. LEE, Mr. TED LIEU of 

California, and Mr. LARSEN of Washington) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

To express support for recognition of June 2017 as National 

Orca Protection Month. 

Whereas orcas are an icon of the Pacific Northwest; 

Whereas orcas are culturally and spiritually important to Indian tribes in the Pacific Northwest; 

Whereas the Puget Sound is home to three pods of Southern 

Resident orcas; 

Whereas the Southern Resident orca population has declined 

dramatically over the past 50 years; 

Whereas the Southern Resident orcas in 2016 lost their matriarch and the oldest known orca, ‘‘Granny’’ (designated 

as J2), along with six other members of the J clan; 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 383 IH 

Whereas the Southern Resident orcas are among the most 

contaminated marine mammals in the world; 

Whereas the Southern Resident orcas are threatened by declining chinook salmon populations; 

Whereas the Southern Resident orcas have been protected 

under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 

1531 et seq.) since 2005 and are one of the most endangered marine mammal populations in the world; 

Whereas June 2017 has been recognized by the States of 

Washington and Oregon as Orca Awareness Month; and 

Whereas the Federal Government has an obligation to protect 

and restore the Southern Resident orca population: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

2 recognition of National Orca Protection Month. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1
 
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
 Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Semele Group, Inc. and subsidiaries (Semele or the Company), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the Principal Executive Officer of the Trusts Managing Trustee, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:
 
 (1)  the Report of the Trust filed today fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
 
 /s/ Gary D. Engle
 Gary D. Engle
 President of AFG ASIT Corporation,
 the Managing Trustee of the Trust
 (Principal Executive Officer)
 May 14, 2004
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear at 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 117.40 Equipment and utensils. ( a ) ( 1 ) All plant equipment and utensils used in manufacturing, processing, packing, or holding food must be so designed and of such material and workmanship as to be adequately cleanable, and must be adequately maintained to protect against allergen cross-contact and contamination.
( 2 ) Equipment and utensils must be designed, constructed, and used appropriately to avoid the adulteration of food with lubricants, fuel, metal fragments, contaminated water, or any other contaminants.
( 3 ) Equipment must be installed so as to facilitate the cleaning and maintenance of the equipment and of adjacent spaces.
( 4 ) Food-contact surfaces must be corrosion-resistant when in contact with food.
( 5 ) Food-contact surfaces must be made of nontoxic materials and designed to withstand the environment of their intended use and the action of food, and, if applicable, cleaning compounds, sanitizing agents, and cleaning procedures.
( 6 ) Food-contact surfaces must be maintained to protect food from allergen cross-contact and from being contaminated by any source, including unlawful indirect food additives.
( b ) Seams on food-contact surfaces must be smoothly bonded or maintained so as to minimize accumulation of food particles, dirt, and organic matter and thus minimize the opportunity for growth of microorganisms and allergen cross-contact.
( c ) Equipment that is in areas where food is manufactured, processed, packed, or held and that does not come into contact with food must be so constructed that it can be kept in a clean and sanitary condition.
( d ) Holding, conveying, and manufacturing systems, including gravimetric, pneumatic, closed, and automated systems, must be of a design and construction that enables them to be maintained in an appropriate clean and sanitary condition.
( e ) Each freezer and cold storage compartment used to store and hold food capable of supporting growth of microorganisms must be fitted with an indicating thermometer, temperature-measuring device, or temperature-recording device so installed as to show the temperature accurately within the compartment.
( f ) Instruments and controls used for measuring, regulating, or recording temperatures, pH, acidity, water activity, or other conditions that control or prevent the growth of undesirable microorganisms in food must be accurate and precise and adequately maintained, and adequate in number for their designated uses.
( g ) Compressed air or other gases mechanically introduced into food or used to clean food-contact surfaces or equipment must be treated in such a way that food is not contaminated with unlawful indirect food additives.
<PAGE>   1
                             EPL Technologies, Inc.

                                  EXHIBIT 11.1

                  Computation of Earnings per Common Share and
                     Fully Diluted Earnings per Common Share
<PAGE>   2
                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.1
                                                                            
EPL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER COMMON SHARE AND
FULLY DILUTED LOSS PER COMMON SHARE
(in thousands except per share data)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

   
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       YEAR       YEAR      YEAR
                                                      ENDED       ENDED    ENDED
                                                     12/31/96   12/31/95  12/31/94
                                                  (As Restated)
<S>                                                   <C>        <C>       <C>
Net Loss                                              $(4,296)   $(3,320) $(3,373)
Accretion, discount and dividends on Preferred Stock      999        314      324
                                                      -------    -------  ------- 
Adjusted net loss for loss per share computation      $(5,295)   $(3,634) $(3,697)
                                                      =======    =======  =======

Weighted average number of common shares              $14,874      9,311    7,259
outstanding                                           =======    =======  =======

Primary loss per share                                $ (0.36)   $ (0.39) $ (0.51)
                                                      =======    =======  =======
Net loss for fully diluted loss per common share      $(4,296)   $(3,320) $(3,373)
computation                                           =======    =======  =======

Weighted average number of common shares               14,874      9,311    7,259
outstanding

Common share equivalent applicable to:
  Series A, convertible preferred stock                 2,618      4,143    4,333
  Series A, warrants                                      248        313      464
  Series B, convertible preferred stock                   266
  Other warrants                                          499      1,530    1,031
  Stock options outstanding                             2,477      1,579    1,043
                                                      -------    -------  -------
Weighted average number of common shares and
  common share equivalents used to compute fully
  diluted loss per share                               20,982     16,876   14,130
                                                      =======    =======  =======

Fully diluted loss per share                          $ (0.20)   $ (0.20) $ (0.24)
                                                      =======    =======  =======
</TABLE>
#### § 1800.306 Cost sharing or matching.

In some cases, NASA research projects require cost sharing or matching. Where cost sharing or matching is required, recipients must secure and document matching funds to receive the Federal award.

[85 FR 71817, Nov. 12, 2020]
§ 1311.305 Recordkeeping. ( a ) If a prescription is created, signed, transmitted, and received electronically, all records related to that prescription must be retained electronically.
( b ) Records required by this subpart must be maintained electronically for two years from the date of their creation or receipt. This record retention requirement shall not pre-empt any longer period of retention which may be required now or in the future, by any other Federal or State law or regulation, applicable to practitioners, pharmacists, or pharmacies.
( c ) Records regarding controlled substances prescriptions must be readily retrievable from all other records. Electronic records must be easily readable or easily rendered into a format that a person can read.
( d ) Records required by this part must be made available to the Administration upon request.
( e ) If an application service provider ceases to provide an electronic prescription application or an electronic pharmacy application or if a registrant ceases to use an application service provider, the application service provider must transfer any records subject to this part to the registrant in a format that the registrant's applications are capable of retrieving, displaying, and printing in a readable format.
( f ) If a registrant changes application providers, the registrant must ensure that any records subject to this part are migrated to the new application or are stored in a format that can be retrieved, displayed, and printed in a readable format.
( g ) If a registrant transfers its electronic prescription files to another registrant, both registrants must ensure that the records are migrated to the new application or are stored in a format that can be retrieved, displayed, and printed in a readable format.
( h ) Digitally signed prescription records must be transferred or migrated with the digital signature.
# Eagle Ford

- South Texas

Reservoir Profile

Geologic Age: Cretaceous, 100 MYA

Lithology: Bituminous Shales

Total Area Size (sq mi): 1,350

Total Gas (tcf): 84

GIP (bcf/sq mi): 200

Producable Gas (tcf): 9.0

Avg. Well Depth (feet): 11,500

Thickness (feet): 250

Horizontal Well Cost ($M): 4.8

Average EUR: 5.5

Pressure (psi): 5,200

Temperature (F): 335

Ro: 1.5TOC (%): 4.5

Porosity (%): 11

Matrix Permeability (nD): 1,100

Pressure Gradient (psi/ft): 0.65

Clay Content (%): 8.0

Silica/Calcite/Carbonate (%) : 87

Adsorbed Gas (%): 20

Average IP: 6.2



# Reservoir Summary

One of the newest shale gas plays is the Cretaceous Eagle Ford, located in South

Texas. It is early for USGS gas estimates, but individual wells are expected to produce

5.5 bcf, from depths of abo ut 11,500 feet and 250 foot formation thickness. Typical

porosities of 11% and permeability in excess of 1 microdarcy are bringing on wells at

initial production rates in the mid

- teen mmcf per day. Seismic and microseismic data

is of excellent quality in t he Eagle Ford play and is useful for drilling and completions

planning.

Click Images to Enlarge
Dismissed and Opinion Filed November 27, 2019.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-19-01408-CR

FREDERICK MITCHELL, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F18-56989-I

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Molberg, Reichek, and Evans

Opinion by Justice Molberg

Frederick Mitchell pleaded guilty to possession of less than one gram of methamphetamine, 

and the trial court placed him on deferred adjudication for three years. In September 2019, the 

State filed a motion to proceed with an adjudication of guilt, alleging appellant had violated 

numerous terms and conditions of his probation. On September 20, 2019, the trial court continued 

appellant on probation, modifying the terms to include participation in a treatment program. 

Appellant filed a notice of appeal on October 29, 2019.

As a general rule, an appellate court may consider appeals by criminal defendants only 

after conviction. Wright v. State, 969 S.W.2d 588, 589 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1998, no pet.). With 

regard to deferred adjudication, the Legislature has authorized appeal of only two types of orders: 

(1) an order granting deferred adjudication, and (2) an order imposing punishment pursuant to an 
–2–

adjudication of guilt. Davis v. State, 195 S.W.3d 708, 711 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Orders 

modifying the terms or conditions of deferred adjudication are not in themselves appealable. Id.

Here, there is no judgment of conviction. Rather, the trial court continued appellant on 

probation. We do not have jurisdiction over an order continuing a defendant on community 

supervision. See id.

We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Do Not Publish

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b)

191408f.u

/Ken Molberg//

KEN MOLBERG

JUSTICE
–3–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

FREDERICK MITCHELL, Appellant

No. 05-19-01408-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court 

No. 2, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F18-56989-I.

Opinion delivered by Justice Molberg, 

Justices Reichek and Evans participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal. 

Judgment entered this 27th day of November, 2019.
§ 133.162 Neufchatel cheese. ( a ) *Description.* ( 1 ) Neufchatel cheese is the soft uncured cheese prepared by the procedure set forth in paragraph (a)(2) of this section or by any other procedure which produces a finished cheese having the same physical and chemical properties. The milkfat content is not less than 20 percent but less than 33 percent by weight of the finished food and the maximum moisture content is 65 percent by weight, as determined by the methods described in § 133.5. The dairy ingredients used are pasteurized.
( 2 ) One or more of the dairy ingredients specified in paragraph (b)(1) of this section is subjected to the action of a harmless lactic acid-producing bacterial culture, with or without one or more of the clotting enzymes specified in paragraph (b)(2) of this section. The mixture is held until the dairy ingredients coagulate. The coagulated mass may be warmed and stirred and it is drained. The moisture content may be adjusted with one of the optional ingredients in paragraph (b)(3)(ii) of this section. The curd may be pressed, chilled, worked, and heated until it becomes fluid. It may then be homogenized or otherwise mixed. One or more of the dairy ingredients specified in paragraph (b)(1) of this section or the other optional ingredients specified in paragraph (b)(3) of this section may be added during the procedure.
( b ) *Optional ingredients.* The following safe and suitable ingredients may be used: ( 1 ) *Dairy ingredients.* Milk, nonfat milk, or cream, as defined in § 133.3.
( 2 ) *Clotting enzymes.* Rennet and/or other clotting enzymes of animal, plant, or microbial origin.
( 3 ) *Other optional ingredients.* ( i ) Salt.
( ii ) Cheese whey, concentrated cheese whey, dried cheese whey, or reconstituted cheese whey prepared by addition of water to concentrated cheese whey or dried cheese whey.
( iii ) Stabilizers, in a total amount not to exceed 0.5 percent of the weight of the finished food, with or without the addition of dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate in a maximum amount of 0.5 percent of the weight of the stabilizer(s) used.
( c ) *Nomenclature.* The name of the food is “neufchatel cheese”.
( d ) *Label declaration.* Each of the ingredients used in the food shall be declared on the label as required by the applicable sections of parts 101 and 130 of this chapter, except that: ( 1 ) Enzymes of animal, plant, or microbial origin may be declared as “enzymes”; and
( 2 ) The dairy ingredients may be declared, in descending order of predominance, by use of the terms “milkfat and nonfat milk” or “nonfat milk and milkfat”, as appropriate.
[54 FR 32057, Aug. 4, 1989, as amended at 58 FR 2894, Jan. 6, 1993]
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1073 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain children’s products. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 18, 2005 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain 

children’s products. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN CHILDREN’S PRODUCTS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.01.80 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended 

6 by striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2008’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

9 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

10 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
II 

Calendar No. 109 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1062 

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to provide for an increase 

in the Federal minimum wage. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 18, 2005 

Mr. KENNEDY (for himself, Mr. REID, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. HARKIN, Mr. DODD, 

Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. JEFFORDS, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. REED, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mrs. CLINTON, Mr. AKAKA, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. CORZINE, Mr. DAYTON, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mr. INOUYE, Mr. KERRY, Ms. LANDRIEU, Mrs. 

LINCOLN, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. LIEBERMAN, 

Mr. OBAMA, Mr. ROCKEFELLER, Mr. SARBANES, Mr. SCHUMER, Ms. 

STABENOW, Mr. WYDEN, and Mr. JOHNSON) introduced the following 

bill; which was read the first time 

MAY 19, 2005 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

A BILL 

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to provide 

for an increase in the Federal minimum wage. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•S 1062 PCS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fair Minimum Wage 

3 Act of 2005’’. 

4 SEC. 2. MINIMUM WAGE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 6(a)(1) of the Fair Labor 

6 Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 206(a)(1)) is amended 

7 to read as follows: 

8 ‘‘(1) except as otherwise provided in this sec9 tion, not less than— 

10 ‘‘(A) $5.85 an hour, beginning on the 60th 

11 day after the date of enactment of the Fair 

12 Minimum Wage Act of 2005; 

13 ‘‘(B) $6.55 an hour, beginning 12 months 

14 after that 60th day; and 

15 ‘‘(C) $7.25 an hour, beginning 24 months 

16 after that 60th day;’’. 

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

18 subsection (a) shall take effect 60 days after the date of 

19 enactment of this Act. 

20 SEC. 3. APPLICABILITY OF MINIMUM WAGE TO THE COM21 MONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA 

22 ISLANDS. 

23 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 6 of the Fair Labor 

24 Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 206) shall apply to the 

25 Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. 
3 

•S 1062 PCS

1 (b) TRANSITION.—Notwithstanding subsection (a), 

2 the minimum wage applicable to the Commonwealth of the 

3 Northern Mariana Islands under section 6(a)(1) of the 

4 Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 206(a)(1)) 

5 shall be— 

6 (1) $3.55 an hour, beginning on the 60th day 

7 after the date of enactment of this Act; and 

8 (2) increased by $0.50 an hour (or such lesser 

9 amount as may be necessary to equal the minimum 

10 wage under section 6(a)(1) of such Act), beginning 

11 6 months after the date of enactment of this Act 

12 and every 6 months thereafter until the minimum 

13 wage applicable to the Commonwealth of the North14 ern Mariana Islands under this subsection is equal 

15 to the minimum wage set forth in such section. 
Calendar No. 109 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1062 

A BILL 

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 

imum wage. to provide for an increase in the Federal minMAY 19, 2005 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar