alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Amended Schedule to the Forms of Indemnification



 Exhibit 10.20 
 Amended Schedule to the Forms of 
 Indemnification Agreement

 Sunoco, Inc. has entered into Indemnification Agreements with the directors, executive officers, trustees, fiduciaries, employees or agents
named below: 
  

			
	 Employee
	  	 Date of Agreement

	Anne-Marie Ainsworth	  	November 2, 2009
	Michael J. Colavita	  	September 2, 2004
	Robert N. Deitz	  	December 2, 2009
	Lynn L. Elsenhans	  	August 8, 2008
	Bruce G. Fischer	  	March 4, 2004
	Peter J. Gvazdauskas	  	February 4, 2009
	Marilyn Heffley	  	December 2, 2009
	Vincent J. Kelley	  	February 2, 2006
	Joseph P. Krott	  	March 4, 2004
	Michael S. Kuritzkes	  	March 4, 2004
	Brian P. MacDonald	  	August 10, 2009
	Christopher J. Minnich	  	June 1, 2009
	Ann C. Mulé	  	March 4, 2004
	Marie A. Natoli	  	March 3, 2006
	Robert W. Owens	  	March 4, 2004
	Bruce D. Rubin	  	October 15, 2008
	Thomas J. Scargle	  	July 2, 2009
	Michael J. Thomson	  	May 30, 2008
	Charmian Uy	  	December 3, 2009
	Dennis Zeleny	  	January 20, 2009

  

			
	Robert M. Aiken, Jr.*	  	February 1, 1996
	Robert H. Campbell*	  	February 1, 1996
	John F. Carroll*	  	March 4, 2004
	Terence P. Delaney*	  	March 4, 2004
	Michael H. R. Dingus*	  	March 4, 2004
	John G. Drosdick*	  	March 4, 2004
	Jack L. Foltz*	  	February 1, 1996
	David E. Knoll*	  	February 1, 1996
	Deborah M. Fretz*	  	September 6, 2001
	Michael J. Hennigan*	  	February 2, 2006
	Thomas W. Hofmann*	  	March 4, 2004
	Michael J. McGoldrick*	  	March 4, 2004
	Joel H. Maness*	  	March 4, 2004
	Paul A. Mulholland*	  	March 4, 2004
	Rolf D. Naku*	  	March 4, 2004
	Alan J. Rothman*	  	March 4, 2004
	Malcolm I. Ruddock, Jr.*	  	February 1, 1996
	David C. Shanks*	  	February 17, 1997
	Sheldon L. Thompson*	  	February 1, 1996
	Ross S. Tippin, Jr.*	  	March 4, 2004
	Charles K. Valutas*	  	March 4, 2004

  

	*	In a different position or no longer with the Company. 









			
	 Director
	  	 Date of Agreement

	Robert J. Darnall	  	March 4, 2004
	Gary W. Edwards	  	May 1, 2008
	Ursula O. Fairbairn	  	March 4, 2004
	Thomas P. Gerrity	  	March 4, 2004
	Rosemarie B. Greco	  	March 4, 2004
	John P. Jones, III	  	September 8, 2006
	James G. Kaiser	  	March 4, 2004
	John W. Rowe	  	March 4, 2004
	John K. Wulff	  	March 8, 2004

  

			
	Raymond E. Cartledge**	  	September 6, 2001
	Robert E. Cawthorn**	  	February 1, 1996
	John G. Drosdick**	  	March 4, 2004
	Mary J. Evans**	  	September 6, 2001
	Robert D. Kennedy**	  	September 6, 2001
	Richard H. Lenny**	  	February 8, 2002
	Norman S. Matthews**	  	September 6, 2001
	R. Anderson Pew**	  	March 4, 2004
	William B. Pounds**	  	February 1, 1996
	G. Jackson Ratcliffe**	  	March 4, 2004

  

	**	No longer serving on the Board. 

  

 2
(logo)GE                                                              GE CAPITAL

                         GE CAPITAL MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC.
                         A UNIT OF GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL MORTGAGE CORPORATION
                         4680 HALLMARK PARKWAY, SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92407



                            OFFICER'S CERTIFICATION



The undersigned officer of GE Capital Mortgage Services, Inc.  hereby  certifies
that:

a)     Such servicing officer has reviewed the activities of the Master Servicer
during the  preceding calendar year or portion thereof and its performance under
the Agreement;

b)      To the best of such servicing officer's knowledge, based on such review,
the Master Servicer has performed and fulfilled its duties, responsibilities and
obligations under the Agreement in all material respects  throughout  such year;

c)     An  officer  has  conducted  an  examination  of  the  activities of each
Servicer during  the  preceding  calendar  year  and  its  performance under the
related servicing agreement;

d)    The Master Servicer has received from each Servicer such Servicer's Annual
Certification of Compliance,

e)      To the best of such officer's  knowledge, based on such examination, the
Servicer   has  performed  and  fulfilled  its  duties,   responsibilities   and
obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material   respects  throughout
such year;

f)      All  premiums   for  each  Standard  Federal  Hazard  Insurance  Policy,
Flood  Insurance Policy  (if any),  Primary Mortgage  Insurance Policy (if any),
and FHA Certificate  of  Mortgage   Insurance  (if any),  with  respect  to each
Mortgage Loan  and  each  Mortgaged  Property  have  been paid and that all such
insurance policies are in full force and effect, and

g)      Such  officer  has  confirmed  that  the  Fidelity   Bond and Errors and
Omissions   Insurance  Policy  are  in   full  force   and  effect  and meet the
requirements of the definitions of such terms.


                                              GE CAPITAL MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC.

March 29, 1996                                    /S/Karol A. Mason
    Date                                          Karol A. Mason, Vice President
###### Editorial Note on Part 180

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 180 appear at 79 FR 75879, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 180.925 Debarment.

*Debarment* means an action taken by a debarring official under Subpart H of this part to exclude a person from participating in covered transactions and transactions covered under the Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR chapter 1). A person so excluded is debarred.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 966 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 966

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         July 28, 2006.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order 
without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the bill 
(H.R. 5970) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the unified 
credit against the estate tax to an exclusion equivalent of $5,000,000, to 
repeal the sunset provision for the estate and generation-skipping taxes, and to 
extend expiring provisions, and for other purposes. The bill shall be considered 
as read. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill to 
final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally 
divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the 
Committee on Ways and Means; and (2) one motion to recommit.
    Sec. 2. Upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order without 
intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 4) to 
provide economic security for all Americans, and for other purposes. The bill 
shall be considered as read. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the bill to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one 
hour of debate equally divided among and controlled by the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means and the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Education and the Workforce; and (2) one 
motion to recommit.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
§ 1304.26 Additional recordkeeping requirements applicable to drug products containing gamma-hydroxybutyric acid. In addition to the recordkeeping requirements for dispensers and researchers provided in § 1304.22, practitioners dispensing gamma-hydroxybutyric acid that is manufactured or distributed in accordance with an application under section 505 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act must maintain and make available for inspection and copying by the Attorney General, all of the following information for each prescription: ( a ) Name of the prescribing practitioner.
( b ) Prescribing practitioner's Federal and State registration numbers, with the expiration dates of these registrations.
( c ) Verification that the prescribing practitioner possesses the appropriate registration to prescribe this controlled substance.
( d ) Patient's name and address.
( e ) Patient's insurance provider, if available.
[70 FR 293, Jan. 4, 2005]
Schedule to the form Indemnification Agreement



 Exhibit 10.13 
 SCHEDULE OF PARTICIPATING DIRECTORS 
 Armstrong Holdings, Inc. and Armstrong World Industries, Inc. have entered into substantially similar agreements with certain of its directors and officers, including John J. Roberts.
Exhibit 99.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hutton Investors Futures Fund L.P. II
(the  "Partnership")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  September 30, 2002 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, David J. Vogel, President of Smith Barney Futures Management LLC,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Partnership.


/s/ David J.Vogel
David J. Vogel
Smith Barney Futures Management LLC
Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2002



<PAGE>
§ 1271.1 What are the purpose and scope of this part? ( a ) *Purpose.* The purpose of this part, in conjunction with §§ 207.9(a)(5), 210.1(c), 210.2, 807.20(d), and 820.1(a) of this chapter, is to create an electronic registration and listing system for establishments that manufacture human cells, tissues, and cellular and tissue-based products (HCT/P's) and to establish donor-eligibility, current good tissue practice, and other procedures to prevent the introduction, transmission, and spread of communicable diseases by HCT/P's.
( b ) *Scope.* ( 1 ) If you are an establishment that manufactures HCT/P's that are regulated solely under the authority of section 361 of the Public Health Service Act (the PHS Act), this part requires you to register and list your HCT/P's with the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research and to comply with the other requirements contained in this part, whether or not the HCT/P enters into interstate commerce. Those HCT/P's that are regulated solely under the authority of section 361 of the PHS Act are described in § 1271.10.
( 2 ) If you are an establishment that manufactures HCT/P's that are regulated as drugs, devices and/or biological products under section 351 of the PHS Act and/or the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, §§ 207.9(a)(5) and 807.20(d) of this chapter require you to register and list your HCT/P's following the procedures in part 207 (if a drug and/or biological product) of this chapter or part 807 (if a device) of this chapter. Sections 210.1(c), 210.2, 211.1(b), and 820.1(a) of this chapter require you to comply with the donor-eligibility procedures in subpart C of this part and the current good tissue practice procedures in subpart D of this part, in addition to all other applicable regulations.
[66 FR 5466, Jan. 19, 2001, as amended at 69 FR 29829, May 25, 2004; 81 FR 60223, Aug. 31, 2016]
#### § 900.13 Severability.

The provisions of this part are separate and severable from one another. Should a court hold any provision(s) to be stayed or invalid, such action shall not affect any other provision of this part and the remaining provisions shall remain in effect.
_ 

Roxul - EPA Meeting August 7, 2014 

Attendees 

Keith 

Susan Fairchild, Senior Environmental Scientist - EPA 

Barnett, Group Leader - EPA 

B

Preston Bridges, Compliance and Enforcement - MDEQ 

ent Jorgensen,VP Operations - Roxul, Jnc. 

Sharon 

Ken Cammarata, 

Taylor, Envi

VP, 

Tonmental 

General Co

Manager

unsel & General Manager- Roxul USA, Inc. 

Tony Bord

- Roxul USA, Inc. 

en, Safety Manager - Roxul USA, Inc. 

Jeff Twaddle, Partner - ERM 

Kasey Harrington, Project Manager - ERM 

Agenda 

8:15-9:00 Overview (45 min) 

-Meet the Team 

-Safety Orientation 

-Rule Status 

-Meeting Purpose/Goals J 

-Confidentiality ofToday's Meeting ( {'NJ"b~ (.o. 

1 

'f~ .~\;.-t; 

9:00-9:30 Company 

-T

and[MAR::i}site Overview (30 min)~ ypes of mineral wool products manufactured 

-Annual Production Rates and Operating Schedules 

products 

-Types and amounts of raw materials used in the production of mineral wool 

9:30- 10:15 Overview of Melting Technology (45 min) 

-Identification of emission sources and potential HAP emitted 

-Design of cupola, bonded 

-Emiss

lines, and collection and curing lines 

procedures 

ion control equipment design, operating parameters, and monitoring 

10:15 - 10:30 Break 

I 0:30 - II :30 Site Tour (Description of mineral wool manufacturing, operations generating HAP) (1 hr) 

11 :30 - 12: 15 Lunch/Discussion of Site Tour ( 45 min) 

12:15 - 12:45 Detailed Furnace SU/SD procedures (30 min) 

12:45 - 1:30 Startup/Shutdown Compliance Demonstration (45 min) 

1:30 - 2:00 Path Forward/Close (30 min) 

4594 Cayct: Road, Byhalia, MS 386 11 

......... www.roxoJ.com 

------------
## IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________



### m 99-50037 Summary Calendar

_______________



### I N THE 

### M ATTER OF 

### : M ARHIL 

### M ANUFACTURING


### , I NC 

### ; AFTAB P ARTNERSHIP


### , A T EXAS 

### P ARTNERSHIP


### ,

Debtors.



### H ARRY 

### S CHREIBER


### , Appellant,

VERSUS



### U NITED 

### S TATES 

### B ANKRUPTCY 

### C OURT


### , Appellee.

_________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (A-98-CV-686-JN)

_________________________ March 27, 20002

Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Harry Schreiber appeals the district court’s affirmance of the bankruptcy court’s refusal to reopen his chapter 7 bankruptcy proceedi ng. It is difficult to tell exac t ly what rulings and issues Schreiber is appealing. For example, the bankruptcy court noted, perceptively, that Schreiber seemed to be requesti ng to be bond ed out of federal prison. He also makes generalized complaints of lack of due process regarding hearin gs and sought recusal of the district judge because that judge presided over Schreiber’s criminal proceedings.

We find no reversible error. The judgment of the district court, affirming the bankruptcy court, is AFFIRMED.

* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.
11/4/10 B&V E-23 1 

### PNM Responses to Joe Kordzi ’s email of November 1, 2010 Question 1: Any additional sections to the SJRPP proposal that were not otherwise provided. Response: PNM has provided the following information on SJRPP:

• A detailed breakdown of the estimate developed for SJRPP.

• A complete bill of quantities for the SJRPP estimate.

• A copy of all the quotations used in developing the PNM estimate. PNM believes that this is a complete package of information. If additional information is requested, please provide a further desc ription of what is being requested. Question 2: Did the SJRPP project include modifications to the air heaters? If yes, please provide a description of the modifications and the final vendor quote for the work. Response: SJRPP did have replacement air heaters. The quotes were not used on PNM because PNM has three air heaters per unit and SJRPP has two heaters per unit. In addition, the primary air heater has a horiz ontal shaft, making it difficu lt to modify with SCR-ready baskets. As a result, a quote was obtained specifically for PNM. However, for comparison purposes, the air heat er quotation for SJRPP has b een provided as a separate file with this email. The cost for the air heaters for SJRPP was $3,900,800 per unit. If this bid were scaled to San Juan Unit 3, the following calculation would be performed for equipment cost:

000 , 901 , 3 $ cos 500 , 081 , 3 200 , 082 , 3 800 , 900 , 3 $ 03

. 1 cos _ _ _ _ _ cos

_ $

_ 2007

_ _ _ cos

6

. 0 6

. 0

= ⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜ ⎝ ⎛ × × = ⎟ ⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜ ⎜ ⎝ ⎛ × × =

t PNM t PNM rate flow SJRPP rate flow gas PNM t SJRPP to rate escalation t PNM

The costs included in B&V’s estimate for San Ju an Unit 3 and Unit 4 (per unit) is as follows:

Primary Air Heaters Material pe r unit $533,000 Quote for SJGS Installation per unit $962,000 Scaled from another project Secondary Air Heater Material pe r unit $1,030,000 Quote for SJGS Installation per unit $2,565,000 Scaled from another project Total $5,090,00011/4/10 B&V E-23 2 As can be seen, the equipment costs for Sa n Juan are lower than SJRPP ($1,563,000 for San Juan versus $3,901,000 scaled from SJRPP) , even considering th e one additional air heater per unit. This is mainly due to the fact that the primary air heater cost for San Juan is replacement of the metal baskets with a more corrosion-resistant metal. Enamel baskets are not possible with a horizontal shaf t air heater. The metal baskets are less expensive that enamel-coated baskets. Question 3: Please provide a copy of the 3/15/07 RFQ for SJRPP and any modifications thereto. Response: We do not understand what re quest for quotation (R FQ) you are referring to on SJRPP. Are you requesting an addition al vendor quote as noted in SJRPP documentation supplied or something different? Please clarif y what “3/15/07 RFQ for SJRPP and any modifications” document(s) is being request ed so that we can respond appropriately.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 289 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                  House Calendar No. 43
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 289

                          [Report No. 115-97]

  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 99) 
making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2017, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2017

   Mr. Sessions, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 99) 
making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2017, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider in the House the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 99) 
making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2017, and for 
other purposes. All points of order against consideration of the joint 
resolution are waived. The joint resolution shall be considered as 
read. All points of order against provisions in the joint resolution 
are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
joint resolution and on any amendment thereto to final passage without 
intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and 
controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
Appropriations; and (2) one motion to recommit.
                                                  House Calendar No. 43

115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 289

                          [Report No. 115-97]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 99) 
making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2017, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 27, 2017

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
#### ROBINSON v. McKNIGHT et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

January 29, 1915.)

Action by Frank B. Robinson, suing, etc., against Chas. McKnight and others, impleaded, etc.

No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs. Order filed. See, also, 151 N. Y. Supp. 1142.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-20467 Summary Calendar

KENNETH W. HICKMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus, DAN MORALES, Attorney General; MACIE MILLER; BURTON F. RAIFORD, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CA-H-96-1118

- - - - - - - - - - August 12, 1996 Before GARWOOD, JOLLY and DUHE’, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal filed by Kenneth W. Hickman (#665874) is DENIED. See Wightman v. Texas Supreme Court , 84 F.3d 188, 189 (5th Cir. 1996); Alexander v. Ieyoub , 62 F.3d 709, 712 (5th Cir. 1995). The appeal is frivolous and it is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. We caution Hickman that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him on his behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions. Hickman is further cautioned to review any pendingNo. 96-20467 - 2 - appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous because they have been previously decided by this
court. IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
Exhibit 32.1

 Certification

 

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:

> 
(1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Inland's Monthly Income Fund, L.P. (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;

(2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(3) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inland's Monthly Income Fund, L.P.
H. Res. 966

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

July 28, 2006.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it 

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order 

to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 5970) to amend the 

Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the unified credit 

against the estate tax to an exclusion equivalent of 

$5,000,000, to repeal the sunset provision for the estate and 

generation skipping taxes, and to extend expiring provisions, 

and for other purposes. The bill shall be considered as read. 

The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 

bill to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) 

one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the 

chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 

Ways and Means; and (2) one motion to recommit. 

SEC. 2. Upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be 

in order without intervention of any point of order to consider 

in the House the bill (H.R. 4) to provide economic security 

for all Americans, and for other purposes. The bill shall be 

considered as read. The previous question shall be considered 
2

•HRES 966 EH 

as ordered on the bill to final passage without intervening 

motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided among 

and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member 

of the Committee on Ways and Means and the chairman and 

ranking minority member of the Committee on Education 

and the Workforce; and (2) one motion to recommit. 

Attest:

Clerk.