alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A20A1905. MITCHELL v. THE STATE.

The above-referenced case was docketed in this Court on May 28, 2020. In

accordance with Court of Appeals Rule 23 (a), the appellant was required to file his

brief within 20 days of that date. But on June 25, 2020, the appellant requested an

extension of time to file his brief, and this Court granted the motion, ordering the

appellant to file her brief by June 29, 2020. As of the date of this order, the appellant

has failed to do so. As a result, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

September 02, 2020

09/02/2020
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 4405

_____________________________
J OSE C. D URON ,
Petitioner
,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition for Belated Appeal

— Original Jurisdiction

.

July 25, 2018

P ER C URIAM

. The petition for belated appeal is denied on the merits.

W OLF , L EWIS , and R AY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Jose C. Duron, pro se
, Petitioner

.2 Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Respondent

.
# EUR-Lex - 31992D0099 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31992D0099

**92/99/EEC: Commission Decision of 22 January 1992 amending Decision 86/473/EEC as regards the list of establishments in Uruguay approved for the purpose of importing meat products into the Community **

*
Official Journal L 039 , 15/02/1992 P. 0042 - 0043 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 22 January 1992 amending Decision 86/473/EEC as regards the list of establishments in Uruguay approved for the purpose of importing meat products into the Community (92/99/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 72/462/EEC of 12 December 1972 on health and veterinary inspection problems upon importation of bovine, ovine and caprine animals and swine, fresh meat or meat products from third countries (1), as last amended by Directive 91/497/EEC (2), and in particular Article 4 (1) thereof,

Whereas a list of establishments in Uruguay, approved for the purpose of importing meat products into the Community, was drawn up initially by Commission Decision 86/473/EEC (3), as last amended by Decision 91/608/EEC (4);

Whereas a Community on-the-spot visit to meat product establishments in Uruguay has revealed that the level of hygiene in one establishment was altered since the last inspection; whereas the list of establishments should be amended accordingly;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Annex to Decision 86/473/EEC is hereby replaced by the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States. Done at Brussels, 22 January 1992. For the Commission

Ray MAC SHARRY

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 302, 31. 12. 1972, p. 28. (2) OJ No L 268, 24. 9. 1991, p. 69. (3) OJ No L 279, 30. 9. 1986, p. 53. (4) OJ No L 331, 3. 12. 1991, p. 17.

ANNEX

LIST OF ESTABLISHMENTS

Approval No Establishment Address 2 Colonia Tararias, Colonia 8 Canelones Canelones, Canelones 30 Incur Fray Bentos, Rio Negro 35 Brincofor Pando, Canelones 92 Kumis Montevideo
#### § 1210.20 Application for permit.

Application for a permit to ship or transport milk or cream into the United States shall be made by the actual shipper upon forms prescribed by the Secretary. The request for forms of applications for permits should be addressed to Commissioner of Food and Drugs, Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 2 (Tuesday, January 4, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 302]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-33201]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 152

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-0456; FRL-8858-2]
RIN 2070-AJ58


Pesticides; Satisfaction of Data Requirements; Procedures To 
Ensure Protection of Data Submitters' Rights; Extension of Comment 
Period

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA issued a proposed rule in the Federal Register of November 
5, 2010, concerning the revision of its regulations which govern 
procedures for the satisfaction of data requirements under the Federal 
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). EPA received two 
requests to extend the comment period for this proposed rule. This 
document extends the comment period for 30 days, from January 4, 2011 
to February 3, 2011.

DATES: Comments, identified by docket identification (ID) number EPA-
HQ-OPP-2009-0456, must be received on or before February 3, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Follow the detailed instructions as provided under ADDRESSES 
in the Federal Register document of November 5, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cameo G. Smoot, Field and External 
Affairs Division, Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental 
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-
0001; telephone number: (703) 305-5454; fax number: (703) 305-5884; e-
mail address: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6d1e00020219430e0c0008022d081d0c430a021b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b3c0dedcdcc79dd0d2ded6dcf3d6c3d29dd4dcc5">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document extends the public comment 
period established in the Federal Register of November 5, 2010 (75 FR 
68297) (FRL-8424-8). In that document, EPA proposed to review its 
regulations which govern procedures for the satisfaction of data 
requirements under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide 
Act (FIFRA). EPA is hereby extending the comment period, which was set 
to end on January 4, 2011, to February 3, 2011.
    To submit comments, or access the docket, please follow the 
detailed instructions as provided under ADDRESSES in the November 5, 
2010 Federal Register document. If you have questions, consult the 
person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 152

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Pesticides and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: December 27, 2010.
Marylouise M. Uhlig,
Acting Assistant Administrator for the Office of Chemical Safety and 
Pollution Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2010-33201 Filed 1-3-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### JOHN M. HUGHES’ SONS CO. v. SMITH et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 26, 1914.)

Action by the John M. Hughes’ Sons Company against Elbert C. Smith and others.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6225

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus BARRY JOHNSON, a/k/a Willie Brown, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CR89-434-S) Submitted: June 18, 1998 Decided: July 8, 1998 Before WILKINS and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Barry Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Harvey Ellis Eisenberg, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals the district court’s orders denying his motions for tape recordings of his trial and for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Appellant’s motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Johnson , No. CA-89-434-S (D. Md. Dec. 29, 1997; Jan. 20, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Editorial Note on Part 14
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 14 appear at 88 FR 45065, July 14, 2023.

§ 14.33 Compilation of materials for members of an advisory committee. The Commissioner shall prepare and provide to all committee members a compilation of materials bearing upon members' duties and responsibilities, including— ( a ) All applicable conflict of interest laws and regulations and a summary of their principal provisions;
( b ) All applicable laws and regulations relating to trade secrets and confidential commercial or financial information that may not be disclosed publicly and a summary of their principal provisions;
( c ) All applicable laws, regulations, and guidance documents relating to the subject matter covered by the advisory committee and a summary of their principal provisions;
( d ) All applicable laws, regulations, including the regulations in part 20 of this chapter, advisory committee charters, Federal Register notices, curricula vitae, rules adopted by the advisory committee, and other material relating to the formation, composition, and operation of the advisory committee, and a summary of their principal provisions;
( e ) Instructions on whom to contact when questions arise; and
( f ) Other material relating to FDA and the subject matter covered by the committee which may facilitate the work of the committee.
[44 FR 22351, Apr. 13, 1979, as amended at 65 FR 56479, Sept. 19, 2000]
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 14 

Disapproving of President Obama and his administration’s refusal to veto 

the anti-Israel resolution adopted by the United Nations Security Council 

on December 23, 2016. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2017 

Mr. ROSS (for himself, Mr. PITTENGER, Mr. GOHMERT, Mrs. BLACK, Mrs. 

BLACKBURN, Mr. JOYCE of Ohio, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. ROTHFUS, Mr. 

CHAFFETZ, Mr. PEARCE, Mr. GOWDY, Mr. BISHOP of Michigan, Mr. 

GOSAR, Mr. STEWART, Mr. MCKINLEY, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. MESSER, Mr. 

ABRAHAM, Mr. JENKINS of West Virginia, Mr. BYRNE, Mrs. MIMI WALTERS of California, Mr. DONOVAN, Mr. HENSARLING, Mr. LOBIONDO, 

Mr. TROTT, Mr. GRAVES of Georgia, Mr. BUCHANAN, Mr. SCHWEIKERT, 

Mr. BRAT, Mr. SMITH of Texas, Mr. WILLIAMS, Mr. DAVIDSON, Mr. TIPTON, Mr. FLEISCHMANN, Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania, Mr. CULBERSON, 

Mr. GIBBS, Mr. TIBERI, Mr. MEEHAN, Mr. GROTHMAN, Mr. POSEY, Mr. 

JODY B. HICE of Georgia, Mrs. WAGNER, Mr. ROKITA, Mrs. WALORSKI, 

Mr. LOUDERMILK, Mr. ARRINGTON, Mr. HARRIS, Mr. KELLY of Mississippi, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. ISSA, and Mrs. HARTZLER) 

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Disapproving of President Obama and his administration’s 

refusal to veto the anti-Israel resolution adopted by the 

United Nations Security Council on December 23, 2016. 

Whereas the State of Israel has been a loyal friend and 

strong ally to the United States since its establishment 

in 1948; 


SSpencer on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 14 IH 

Whereas the United States Government has historically opposed and vetoed United Nations Security Council resolutions that are one-sided and anti-Israel; 

Whereas, on December 23, 2016, the United Nations Security Council adopted an anti-Israel resolution that threatens peace in the Middle East and breaks longstanding 

United States foreign policy; and 

Whereas the United States Government, under the direction 

of President Barack Obama, broke its longstanding commitment to the State of Israel, our strongest ally in the 

Middle East, by refusing to veto this one-sided and antiIsrael resolution: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) disapproves of United Nations Security 

3 Council Resolution 2334 adopted on December 23, 

4 2016; 

5 (2) disapproves of President Barack Obama 

6 and his administration’s failure to veto this one7 sided and anti-Israel resolution; 

8 (3) affirms the United States Government in 

9 the future must continue to oppose and veto United 

10 Nations Security Council resolutions that are one11 sided and anti-Israel; 

12 (4) affirms its commitment to the State of 

13 Israel as our loyal friend and strong ally in the Mid14 dle East; and 


SSpencer on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 14 IH 

1 (5) affirms its commitment to work with future 

2 Presidents to strengthen our alliance with the State 

3 of Israel. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT
31.1






CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 302




I,
William B. Berens, certify that:




1.   
I have reviewed this quarterly report of National Datacomputer,
Inc.




2.   
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.   
Omitted;




4.   
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the
registrant and have:




a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b)
designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles;




c)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and




d)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.   
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.






Date:  
August 20, 2008






By:      /s/ William B.
Berens


William B.
Berens


President and
Chief Executive Officer
#### § 418.405 Penalty procedures.

Agencies shall impose and collect civil penalties pursuant to the provisions of the Program Fraud and Civil Remedies Act, 31 U.S.C.s 3803 (except subsection (c)), 3804, 3805, 3806, 3807, 3808, and 3812, insofar as these provisions are not inconsistent with the requirements herein.
(logo) Deutsche Bank

 

1761 East St. Andrew Place

Santa Ana, CA 92705-4934

 

Tel 714 247 6000

Fax 714 247 6009 

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

 

COMM 2013-CCRE6

 

The undersigned, David Co, a Director of Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as the Certificate Administrator (a “Certifying Servicer”) under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2013 (the “Agreement”), by and among, Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor, here by certifies in accordance with Section 10.11 of the Agreement:

 

A) A review of such Certifying Servicer’s activities from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 (the “reporting period”) and of such Certifying Servicer’s performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision and

 

B) That, as to the best of such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, such Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement, in all material respects throughout the reporting period.

 

 

DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS

as Certificate Administrator   

 

/s/ David Co

BY: David Co

Title: Director

Date: March 1, 2016
§ 1108.310 Program income. *Program income* means gross income earned by a recipient or subrecipient that is directly generated by a supported activity or earned as a result of an award or subaward (during the period of performance unless the award or subaward specifies continuing requirements concerning disposition of program income after the end of that period). ( a ) Program income includes, but is not limited to, income from: ( 1 ) Fees for services performed;
( 2 ) The use or rental of real or personal property for which the recipient or subrecipient is accountable under the award or subaward (whether acquired under the award or subaward, or other Federal awards from which accountability for the property was transferred);
( 3 ) The sale of commodities or items fabricated under the award or subaward;
( 4 ) License fees and royalties on patents and copyrights; and
( 5 ) Payments of principal and interest on loans made with award or subaward funds.
( b ) Program income does not include: ( 1 ) Interest earned on advances of Federal funds;
( 2 ) Proceeds from the sale of real property or equipment under the award; or
( 3 ) Unless otherwise specified in Federal statute or regulation, or the terms and conditions of the award or subaward: ( i ) Rebates, credits, discounts, and interest earned on any of them; or
( ii ) Governmental revenues, taxes, special assessments, levies, fines, and similar revenues raised by the recipient or subrecipient.
§ 1304.06 Records and reports for electronic prescriptions. ( a ) As required by § 1311.120 of this chapter, a practitioner who issues electronic prescriptions for controlled substances must use an electronic prescription application that retains the following information: ( 1 ) The digitally signed record of the information specified in part 1306 of this chapter.
( 2 ) The internal audit trail and any auditable event identified by the internal audit as required by § 1311.150 of this chapter.
( b ) An institutional practitioner must retain a record of identity proofing and issuance of the two-factor authentication credential, where applicable, as required by § 1311.110 of this chapter.
( c ) As required by § 1311.205 of this chapter, a pharmacy that processes electronic prescriptions for controlled substances must use an application that retains the following: ( 1 ) All of the information required under § 1304.22(c) and part 1306 of this chapter.
( 2 ) The digitally signed record of the prescription as received as required by § 1311.210 of this chapter.
( 3 ) The internal audit trail and any auditable event identified by the internal audit as required by § 1311.215 of this chapter.
( d ) A registrant and application service provider must retain a copy of any security incident report filed with the Administration pursuant to §§ 1311.150 and 1311.215 of this chapter.
( e ) An electronic prescription or pharmacy application provider must retain third party audit or certification reports as required by § 1311.300 of this chapter.
( f ) An application provider must retain a copy of any notification to the Administration regarding an adverse audit or certification report filed with the Administration on problems identified by the third-party audit or certification as required by § 1311.300 of this chapter.
( g ) Unless otherwise specified, records and reports must be retained for two years.
[75 FR 16306, Mar. 31, 2010]
| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| August 13, 2010 |   | /s/ Christopher J. Schaber            |
|-----------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|            |   | Christopher J. Schaber, Ph.D.         |
|            |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|            |   | (Principal Executive Officer)         |
|            |   |                                  |