alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 7 (Tuesday, January 12, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 1622]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-332]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Decision To Evaluate a Petition To Designate a Class of Employees 
for the General Electric Company, Evendale, OH, To Be Included in the 
Special Exposure Cohort

AGENCY: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: HHS gives notice as required by 42 CFR 83.12(e) of a decision 
to evaluate a petition to designate a class of employees for the 
General Electric Company, Evendale, Ohio, to be included in the Special 
Exposure Cohort under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness 
Compensation Program Act of 2000. The initial proposed definition for 
the class being evaluated, subject to revision as warranted by the 
evaluation, is as follows:
    Facility: General Electric Company.
    Location: Evendale, Ohio.
    Job Titles and/or Job Duties: All employees of the Department of 
Energy, its predecessor agencies, and their contractors and 
subcontractors.
    Period of Employment: January 1, 1961 through June 30, 1970.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stuart L. Hinnefeld, Interim Director, 
Office of Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for 
Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-46, 
Cincinnati, OH 45226, Telephone 513-533-6800 (this is not a toll-free 
number). Information requests can also be submitted by e-mail to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7d323e3c2e3d3e393e533a322b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="551a161406151611167b121a03">[email protected]</span></a>.

John Howard,
Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2010-332 Filed 1-11-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-19-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### EDWIN M. KEATLEY v. THE UNITED STATES.

[41 C. Cls. R., 384; 204 U. S. R., 562.]

*On the defendants' Appeal.*

The clerk of the United States Circuit Court in West Virginia, pursuant to a rule of the court and in accordance with State practice, makes out copies of subpoenas for service on witnesses. He also charges fees where the court has ordered a-severance.

The court below decides:

1. Where both State practice and the order of the court require that subpoenas be served by copy, the clerk is entitled to his fees for making the copies.

2. Where joint indictments were returned against several defendants, but separate trials were granted to some of them, the clerk was justified in docketing the eases of these defendants as if separate indictments had been returned against them.

3. The term “ *cause*” in Revised Statutes, § 828, is synonymous with “ *case ” or*“ *suit,”*and indicates a proceeding in court. When Congress enumerates the details of a trial, such as issuing a venire, taxing costs, etc., in connection with the term, it is evidently employed as usually used in practice.

The decision of the court below is affirmed upon the same grounds.

February 25, 1907.

Mr. Justice McKenna

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court
Amended 2006 Incentive Compensation Program for Jeffrey Croft



 Exhibit 10.3 
 Dominion Homes, Inc. 
 Amended 2006 Incentive Compensation Program 
 Jeffrey Croft, President and COO 
 Net Income
(40% of Total) 
  

				
	 Goal
	  	Award
	 Target
	  	$	48,000
	 Stretch
	  	$	120,000
	 Exceptional
	  	$	200,000

 Corporate Debt Management (40% of Total) 
  

				
	 Goal
	  	Award
	 100% of Target Debt Reduction
	  	$	48,000
	 133% of Target Debt Reduction
	  	$	120,000
	 166% of Target Debt Reduction
	  	$	200,000

 Customer Satisfaction (20% of Total) 
  

				
	 Goal
	  	Award
	 94%
	  	$	24,000
	 95%
	  	$	60,000
	 96%
	  	$	100,000
§ 1311.125 Requirements for establishing logical access control—Individual practitioner. ( a ) At each registered location where one or more individual practitioners wish to use an electronic prescription application meeting the requirements of this subpart to issue controlled substance prescriptions, the registrant(s) must designate at least two individuals to manage access control to the application. At least one of the designated individuals must be a registrant who is authorized to issue controlled substance prescriptions and who has obtained a two-factor authentication credential as provided in § 1311.105.
( b ) At least one of the individuals designated under paragraph (a) of this section must verify that the DEA registration and State authorization(s) to practice and, where applicable, State authorization(s) to dispense controlled substances of each registrant being granted permission to sign electronic prescriptions for controlled substances are current and in good standing.
( c ) After one individual designated under paragraph (a) of this section enters data that grants permission for individual practitioners to have access to the prescription functions that indicate readiness for signature and signing or revokes such authorization, a second individual designated under paragraph (a) of this section must use his two-factor authentication credential to satisfy the logical access controls. The second individual must be a DEA registrant.
( d ) A registrant's permission to indicate that controlled substances prescriptions are ready to be signed and to sign controlled substance prescriptions must be revoked whenever any of the following occurs, on the date the occurrence is discovered: ( 1 ) A hard token or any other authentication factor required by the two-factor authentication protocol is lost, stolen, or compromised. Such access must be terminated immediately upon receiving notification from the individual practitioner.
( 2 ) The individual practitioner's DEA registration expires, unless the registration has been renewed.
( 3 ) The individual practitioner's DEA registration is terminated, revoked, or suspended.
( 4 ) The individual practitioner is no longer authorized to use the electronic prescription application (e.g., when the individual practitioner leaves the practice).
TraciaY. Lee

A Professional Limited Liability Company

P.O. Box. 171022 Voice: 512.814.6167

Austin, Texas 78717 Facsimile: +1 512.271.6806

Email: tlee@tleelaw.com

March 30, 2015

VIA E-FILE

Mr. Keith E. Hottle

Fourth Court of Appeals

Cadena-Reeves Justice Center

300 Dolorosa, Suite 3200

San Antonio, TX 78205-3037

Re: Case No. 04-15-00074-CV; Stacey Scott v. Larry Furrow and Keller 

Williams Legacy Group; pending in the Fourth Court of Appeals, 

San Antonio, Texas

Dear Mr. Hottle:

Please allow this correspondence to serve as notice of my appearance as counsel of 

record for Appellant Stacey Scott in the above-referenced matter.

Please take note that on March 26, 2015, Ms. Scott filed a Motion for New Trial 

pertaining to the February 24, 2015 trial court judgment awarding attorney’s fees to 

Appellees. The filing of the Motion for New Trial extends the appellate deadlines.

However, in the interest of caution, and to comply with this Court’s order of March 19, 

2015, Ms. Scott will file an amended notice of appeal with the trial court today. 

Thank you for your attention to this matter, and please let me know if you have any 

questions or concerns. 

Sincerely,

Tracia Y. Lee, PLLC

By: Tracia Y. Lee 

cc: Scott F. Cline (Via E-service)

Thornton, Biechlin, Segrato, Reynolds & Guerra, L.C.

Fax: (210) 525-0666

Attorneys for Appellees Larry Furrow and Keller Williams Legacy Group

ACCEPTED

04-15-00074-CV

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

3/30/2015 1:03:57 PM

KEITH HOTTLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 3/30/2015 1:03:57 PM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
<PAGE>   1


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FRONTIER FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES                    EXHIBIT 11
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              For Six Months Ended June 30,
                                                  1997             1996
                                               ----------       ----------
<S>                                            <C>              <C>       
Net Income                                     $8,375,821       $7,236,396
                                               ==========       ==========

Computation of average
shares outstanding

             Shares outstanding at
             beginning of year                  6,830,666        6,322,255

             Additional shares deemed
             outstanding because of
             stock dividends                      479,482          917,240

             Additional shares deemed
             outstanding because of
             stock split                                0                0

             Shares issued during the
             year times average time
             outstanding during the year            7,535           18,358
                                               ----------       ----------

Average shares outstanding                      7,317,683        7,257,853
                                               ==========       ==========

Primary earnings per share                     $     1.14       $     1.00
                                               ==========       ==========
</TABLE>
§ 183.15 Responsibilities of Federal awarding agencies. ( a ) Prior to making an award for a covered grant or cooperative agreement (see also § 183.35), the Federal awarding agency must check the current list of prohibited or restricted persons or entities in the System Award Management (SAM) Exclusions.
( b ) The Federal awarding agency may include the award term provided in appendix A of this part in all covered grant and cooperative agreement awards in accordance with Never Contract with the Enemy.
( c ) A Federal awarding agency may become aware of a person or entity that: ( 1 ) Provides funds, including goods and services, received under a covered grant or cooperative agreement of an executive agency directly or indirectly to covered persons or entities; or
( 2 ) Fails to exercise due diligence to ensure that none of the funds, including goods and services, received under a covered grant or cooperative agreement of an executive agency are provided directly or indirectly to covered persons or entities.
( d ) When a Federal awarding agency becomes aware of such a person or entity, it may do any of the following actions: ( 1 ) Restrict the future award of all Federal contracts, grants, and cooperative agreements to the person or entity based upon concerns that Federal awards to the entity would provide grant funds directly or indirectly to a covered person or entity.
( 2 ) Terminate any contract, grant, or cooperative agreement to a covered person or entity upon becoming aware that the recipient has failed to exercise due diligence to ensure that none of the award funds are provided directly or indirectly to a covered person or entity.
( 3 ) Void in whole or in part any grant, cooperative agreement or contracts of the executive agency concerned upon a written determination by the head of contracting activity or other appropriate official that the grant or cooperative agreement provides funds directly or indirectly to a covered person or entity.
( e ) The Federal awarding agency must notify recipients in writing regarding its decision to restrict all future awards and/or to terminate or void a grant or cooperative agreement. The agency must also notify the recipient in writing about the recipient's right to request an administrative review (using the agency's procedures) of the restriction, termination, or void of the grant or cooperative agreement within 30 days of receiving notification.
### Ground water in Huerfano County, Colorado

By: Thad Gerald McLaughlin

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1805

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **1**                            (11698 pdf)                        
  - **2**                            (10035 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 7**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
================================================================================

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Annual Report of CirTran Corporation on Form 10-Q
for the period ending march 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Iehab Hawatmeh, Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.



Dated: May 26, 2011

                             /s/ Iehab Hawatmeh
                            -------------------
                            Iehab Hawatmeh
                            Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
                            (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
                            Officer)




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
###### Editorial Note on Part 12

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 12 appear at 88 FR 45064, July 14, 2023.

#### § 12.105 Examination of record.

Documents in the record will be publicly available in accordance with § 10.20(j). Documents available for examination or copying will be placed on public display in the office of the Dockets Management Staff promptly upon receipt in that office.
H. Res. 414 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 28, 2017. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 3003) to 

amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to modify provisions relating to assistance by States, and political subdivision of States, in the enforcement of Federal immigration 

laws, and for other purposes. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. The bill shall be considered 

as read. All points of order against provisions in the bill are 

waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered 

on the bill and on any amendment thereto to final passage 

without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate 

equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary; and (2) 

one motion to recommit. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
# L_2004239EN.01003601.xml

| 9.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 239/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 239/36

---

Corrigendum to Council Directive 93/32/EEC of 14 June 1993 on passenger hand-holds on two-wheel motor vehicles

(
  Official Journal of the European Communities L 188 of 29 July 1993
  )

Official Journal of the European Communities L 188 of 29 July 1993

On page 28, in Article 4(1), first subparagraph:

for:

‘... to comply with this Directive not later than 14 December 1993.’,

read:

‘... to comply with this Directive no later than 14 December 1994.’.

---
38539.

#### PEOPLES LOAN & FINANCE CORPORATION *et al.*v. CY OWENS, INC.

Decided October 13, 1960

Rehearing denied October 25,1960.

*Wright, Rogers, Magruder & Hoyt, Clinton J. Morgan,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Covington, Kilpatrick & Storey, J. S. Kilpatrick,*contra.

Townsend, Judge.

*Code Aiin.*§ 6-911 provides in part that a return of service of a bill of exceptions may be either in the form of an affidavit or by an unverified certification by one of counsel for the plaintiff in error showing service, indorsed on or annexed to the bill of exceptions. However, nothing appears on the bill of exceptions in this case except what purports to be a typewritten certification of service dated three days after the date of certification by the trial judge and reciting that one of counsel for the plaintiff in error served one of counsel for the defendant in error, but this attempted certificate is unsigned and therefore ineffective for any purpose. See *Johnson v.*Kent, 160 Ga. 792 (129 S. E. 102). Where, as here, there is no proper affidavit or certificate of service, and service is neither acknowledged nor waived, the bill of exceptions must be

*Dismissed.*

*Carlisle and Frankum, JJ., concur. Gardner, P. J., not participating.*
§ 1114.13 Change in ownership of an application. An applicant may transfer ownership of a PMTA. At or before the time of transfer, the new owner and the former owner must submit information to FDA using the appropriate form as follows: ( a ) The new and former owner must sign and submit a notice to FDA stating that all of the former applicant's rights and responsibilities relating to the PMTA have been transferred to the new owner. This notice must identify the name and address of the new owner and the PMTA transferred by tobacco product name(s) and STN.
( b ) The new owner must sign and submit a notice to FDA containing the following: ( 1 ) The new owner's commitment to agreements, promises, and conditions made by the former owner and contained in the application and marketing granted order, if applicable;
( 2 ) The date that the change in ownership is effective;
( 3 ) Either a statement that the new owner has a complete copy of the application, including all amendments, the marketing granted order (if applicable), and any records that are required to be kept under § 1114.45, or a request for a copy of the application, including all amendments, and the modified risk order (if applicable) from FDA's files in accordance with part 20 of this chapter. In accordance with the Freedom of Information Act, FDA will provide a copy of the application to the new owner under the fee schedule in FDA's public information regulations in § 20.45 of this chapter; and
( 4 ) A certification that no modifications have been made to the tobacco product since the application, including amendments (if any), was submitted to FDA.
§ 133.170 Pasteurized process cheese with fruits, vegetables, or meats. ( a ) Unless a definition and standard of identity specifically applicable is established by another section of this part, a pasteurized process cheese with fruits, vegetables, or meats, or mixtures of these is a food which conforms to the definition and standard of identity, and is subject to the requirements for label statement of ingredients, prescribed for pasteurized process cheese by § 133.169, except that: ( 1 ) Its moisture content may be 1 percent more, and the milk fat content of its solids may be 1 percent less than the limits prescribed by § 133.169 for moisture and fat in the corresponding pasteurized process cheese.
( 2 ) It contains one or any mixture of two or more of the following: Any properly prepared cooked, canned, or dried fruit; any properly prepared cooked, canned, or dried vegetable; any properly prepared cooked or canned meat.
( 3 ) When the added fruits, vegetables, or meats contain fat, the method prescribed for the determination of fat by § 133.5(b) is not applicable.
( b ) The name of a pasteurized process cheese with fruits, vegetables, or meats is the name prescribed by § 133.169 for the applicable pasteurized process cheese, followed by the term “with ______”, the blank being filled in with the common or usual name or names of the fruits, vegetables, or meats used, in order of predominance by weight.
[42 FR 14366, Mar. 15, 1977, as amended at 49 FR 10095, Mar. 19, 1984; 58 FR 2894, Jan. 6, 1993]
#### § 133.154 High-moisture jack cheese.

High-moisture jack cheese conforms to the definition and standard of identity and is subject to the requirement for label statement of ingredients prescribed for monterey cheese by § 133.153, except that its moisture content is more than 44 percent but less than 50 percent.

[58 FR 2893, Jan. 6, 1993]
x



P



hindi · april 2003

1

2

3
nih publication no. 03-5058

ndep 52 - xx hindi · april 2003
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the use of our
report included in this registration statement and to the incorporation by
reference in this registration statement of our report dated February 17, 1998
included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Western Wireless Corporation for
the year ended December 31, 1997, and to all references to our firm included in
this registration statement.
 
                                          By:   /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
 
                                            ------------------------------------
                                                    Arthur Andersen LLP
 
Seattle, Washington
April 6, 1998
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23.1



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 33-99740, Form S-8 No. 33-40365 and Form S-8 No. 333-9162)
pertaining to the Power Control Technologies Inc. 1995 Stock Option Plan, the M
& F Worldwide 1997 Stock Option Plan, and the M & F Worldwide Corp. 2000 Stock
Option Plan of M & F Worldwide Corp. of our report dated February 24, 2004, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of M & F
Worldwide Corp. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2003.


                                                        /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


March 15, 2004
New York, New York