alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1017 

To reauthorize grants for the water resources research and technology 

institutes established under the Water Resources Research Act of 1984. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 12, 2005 

Mr. CHAFEE (for himself, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. JEFFORDS, Mrs. CLINTON, Mr. 

LAUTENBERG, Mr. VITTER, Mr. BAUCUS, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Mr. CRAPO, 

Mr. ENZI, and Mr. CORZINE) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public 

Works 

A BILL

To reauthorize grants for the water resources research and 

technology institutes established under the Water Resources Research Act of 1984.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Water Resources Re5 search Act Amendments of 2005’’. 
2

•S 1017 IS

1 SEC. 2. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH. 

2 (a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section 

3 104(f) of the Water Resources Research Act of 1984 (42 

4 U.S.C. 10303(f)) is amended— 

5 (1) in the subsection header, by striking ‘‘IN

6 GENERAL’’; 

7 (2) by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the 

8 following: 

9 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—There is authorized to be 

10 appropriated to carry out this section, to remain 

11 available until expended— 

12 ‘‘(A) $12,000,000 for each of fiscal years 

13 2006 through 2008; and 

14 ‘‘(B) $13,000,000 for each of fiscal years 

15 2009 and 2010.’’; and 

16 (3) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘(2) Any’’ and 

17 inserting the following: 

18 ‘‘(2) FAILURE TO OBLIGATE FUNDS.—Any’’. 

19 (b) ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS WHERE RE20 SEARCH FOCUSED ON WATER PROBLEMS OF INTERSTATE

21 NATURE.—Section 104(g) of the Water Resources Re22 search Act of 1984 (42 U.S.C. 10303(g)) is amended— 

23 (1) by redesignating paragraph (2) as para24 graph (4); and 

25 (2) in paragraph (1)— 

26 (A) in the first sentence— 
3

•S 1017 IS

1 (i) by striking ‘‘There’’ and inserting 

2 the following: 

3 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—There’’; and 

4 (ii) by striking ‘‘$3,000,000 for fiscal 

5 year 2001, $4,000,000 for fiscal years 

6 2002 and 2003, and $6,000,000 for fiscal 

7 years 2004 and 2005’’ and inserting 

8 ‘‘$6,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2006 

9 through 2008 and $7,000,000 for each of 

10 fiscal years 2009 and 2010’’; 

11 (B) in the second sentence, by striking 

12 ‘‘Such’’ and inserting the following: 

13 ‘‘(2) NON-FEDERAL MATCHING FUNDS.—The’’; 

14 and 

15 (C) in the third sentence, by striking 

16 ‘‘Funds’’ and inserting the following: 

17 ‘‘(3) AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS.—Funds’’.

Æ
§ 1.79 Tobacco products. In addition to the data required to be submitted in § 1.72, an ACE filer must submit the following information at the time of filing entry in ACE. ( a ) *Brand name* of an article that is a tobacco product that is being imported or offered for import. If the article does not have a specific brand name, the ACE filer must submit a commercial name for the brand name. This data element is not applicable to those products solely intended either for further manufacturing or as investigational tobacco products.
( b ) [Reserved]
H. Res. 55 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 24, 2017. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 7) to prohibit taxpayer funded abortions. All points of order against 

consideration of the bill are waived. The bill shall be considered as read. All points of order against provisions in the bill 

are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and on any amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the Majority Leader 

and the Minority Leader or their respective designees; and 

(2) one motion to recommit. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 702 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 702

  Recognizing the roles and the contributions of America's Certified 
   Registered Nurse Anesthetists (CRNAs) and their role in providing 
                   quality healthcare for the public.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 18, 2018

  Ms. Schakowsky (for herself, Mr. Graves of Missouri, and Ms. Roybal-
 Allard) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Recognizing the roles and the contributions of America's Certified 
   Registered Nurse Anesthetists (CRNAs) and their role in providing 
                   quality healthcare for the public.

Whereas Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists (CRNAs) are essential to 
        America's healthcare system, providing high-quality, cost-effective 
        anesthesia care for more than 150 years;
Whereas CRNAs safely administer approximately 43 million anesthetics to patients 
        each year;
Whereas CRNAs are the primary providers of anesthesia care in rural America, 
        enabling healthcare facilities in these medically underserved areas to 
        offer obstetrical, surgical, trauma stabilization, and pain management 
        services;
Whereas CRNAs practice in every setting in which anesthesia is delivered, 
        including traditional hospital surgical suites and obstetrical delivery 
        rooms; the offices of dentists, podiatrists, ophthalmologists, and 
        plastic surgeons; ambulatory surgical centers; United States Military 
        and Public Health Services and Department of Veterans Affairs medical 
        facilities;
Whereas nurse anesthetists first provided anesthesia to wounded soldiers during 
        the American Civil War and have been the main provider of anesthesia 
        care to United States military personnel on the front lines since World 
        War I, including all current United States military actions around the 
        globe; and
Whereas the purpose of National CRNA Week, held January 21, 2018, through 
        January 27, 2018, is to raise public awareness of and celebrate the 
        Nation's 52,000 Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists and student 
        registered nurse anesthetists: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives thanks and promotes the 
profession of Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists (CRNAs) by 
encouraging patients, hospital administrators, healthcare 
professionals, policymakers, and others to become more familiar with 
the CRNA credential and the exceptional advanced practice registered 
nurses who have earned it by participating in National CRNA Week.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7103 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7103

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 30, 2024

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business 
                          and Entrepreneurship

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the Small Business Act to require Federal agencies to testify 
     and report on scores received under the scorecard program for 
 evaluating Federal agency compliance with small business contracting 
goals, to testify for failure to meet Governmentwide contracting goals, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Agency Accountability Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. FEDERAL AGENCY TESTIMONY ON SCORECARD SCORES AND FAILURE TO 
              ACHIEVE CERTAIN GOALS.

    Section 15(g)(2) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644(g)(2)) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(G) Testimony required.--The head of the office 
        established in a Federal agency under subsection (k) shall 
        testify before the Committee on Small Business and 
        Entrepreneurship of the Senate and the Committee on Small 
        Business of the House of Representatives under the following 
        circumstances:
                    ``(i) If such agency fails to receive a score 
                equivalent to a letter grade of `A' or above on the 
                scorecard established under subsection (y) for a fiscal 
                year, on the reasons for such failure.
                    ``(ii) If such agency fails to meet two or more of 
                the Governmentwide goals established under paragraph 
                (1)(A), on the reasons for such failure,''.

SEC. 3. FEDERAL AGENCY REPORTING ON SCORECARD SCORES.

    Section 15(h)(1)(D) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 
644(h)(1)(D)) is amended by inserting ``and to improve the score on the 
scorecard established under subsection (y)'' after ``better meet such 
goals''.

SEC. 4. COMPLIANCE WITH CUTGO.

    No additional amounts are authorized to be appropriated to carry 
out this Act or the amendments made by this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 29, 2024.

            Attest:

                                             KEVIN F. MCCUMBER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### § 1306.06 Persons entitled to fill prescriptions.

A prescription for a controlled substance may only be filled by a pharmacist, acting in the usual course of his professional practice and either registered individually or employed in a registered pharmacy, a registered central fill pharmacy, or registered institutional practitioner.

[68 FR 37410, June 24, 2003, as amended at 70 FR 36343, June 23, 2005]
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

MERRILL CLARK GARDNER, a.k.a.

Clark Gardner, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-30183 

D.C. No. 1:15-cr-00073-SPW

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 9, 2017**

Before: SCHROEDER, TASHIMA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges. 

Merrill Clark Gardner appeals from the district court’s judgment and 

challenges the 183-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction 

for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation 

of 21 U.S.C. § 846. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

AUG 14 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-30183 

Gardner contends that the district court erred by applying a four-level 

aggravating role enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(a). We review the district 

court’s factual findings for clear error and its application of the Guidelines to the 

facts for abuse of discretion. See United States v. Gasca-Ruiz, 852 F.3d 1167, 

1170 (9th Cir. 2017) (en banc). The district court did not abuse its discretion when 

it concluded, based on the undisputed facts in the presentence report and the 

testimony of Special Agent Robert Grayson, that Gardner acted as a leader or 

organizer of the conspiracy within the meaning of section 3B1.1(a). See United 

States v. Rivera, 527 F.3d 891, 908-09 (9th Cir. 2008) (enhancement supported 

where evidence established that defendant exercised control over others and 

“exercised decision making authority in the procurement and distribution of 

narcotics”); see also United States v. Garcia, 497 F.3d 964, 970 (9th Cir. 2007) 

(enhancement “does not require control over all of the five or more participants”). 

AFFIRMED.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed February 2, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

Nos. 3D19-2336 & 3D21-161

Lower Tribunal No. 08-67650

________________

Simon Nemni, et al.,

Appellants,

vs.

Rafael Barrera,

Appellee.

Appeals from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Antonio Arzola, 

Judge.

Smoler & Associates, P.A., and Bruce J. Smoler (Hollywood), for 

appellants.

Barakat + Bossa PLLC, and Jocelyne A. Macelloni and Brian Barakat, 

for appellee.

Before LOGUE, GORDO and LOBREE, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1007 

To require the Secretary of the Interior to develop a strategy to relocate 

the headquarters of the Bureau of Land Management from Washington, 

DC, to a western State in a manner that will save the maximum amount 

of taxpayer money practicable, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 2, 2017 

Mr. GARDNER (for himself, Mr. HATCH, Mr. HELLER, Mr. SULLIVAN, and 

Mr. DAINES) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of the Interior to develop a strategy 

to relocate the headquarters of the Bureau of Land 

Management from Washington, DC, to a western State 

in a manner that will save the maximum amount of 

taxpayer money practicable, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bureau of Land Man5 agement Headquarters Relocation Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1007 IS

1 (1) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

2 the Secretary of the Interior. 

3 (2) WESTERN STATE.—The term ‘‘western 

4 State’’ means any of the States of Alaska, Arizona, 

5 California, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New 

6 Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, or Wyoming. 

7 SEC. 3. STRATEGY FOR RELOCATING THE HEADQUARTERS 

8 OF THE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT 

9 FROM WASHINGTON, DC, TO A WESTERN 

10 STATE. 

11 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the 

12 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit 

13 to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of 

14 the Senate and the Committee on Natural Resources of 

15 the House of Representatives a strategy for relocating the 

16 headquarters of the Bureau of Land Management from 

17 Washington, DC, to a western State in a manner that will 

18 save the maximum amount of taxpayer money practicable. 

19 (b) REQUIREMENTS.—The strategy submitted under 

20 subsection (a) shall include— 

21 (1) metrics for choosing a location for the relo22 cated headquarters of the Bureau of Land Manage23 ment; 

24 (2) a description of the determining factors in 

25 favor of the relocation; and 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1007 IS

1 (3) a proposed timeline for the relocation. 

2 SEC. 4. AUTHORIZATION FOR RELOCATION OF THE HEAD3 QUARTERS OF THE BUREAU OF LAND MAN4 AGEMENT FROM WASHINGTON, DC, TO A 

5 WESTERN STATE. 

6 Notwithstanding section 72 of title 4, United States 

7 Code, the Secretary may relocate the headquarters of the 

8 Bureau of Land Management from Washington, DC, to 

9 a western State specified by the Secretary. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### § 1250.49 Cleanliness of conveyances.

Conveyances while in transit shall be kept clean and free of flies and mosquitoes. A conveyance which becomes infected with vermin shall be placed out of service until such time as it shall have been effectively treated for the destruction of the vermin.
1213.7001 Solicitation provision and contract clause.       (a) Contracting officers shall insert the provision as prescribed at 1252.237–71, Certification of Data, in all solicitations and requests for quotations, and the clause as prescribed at 1252.237–72, Prohibition on Advertising, in solicitations, requests for quotations, and all contracts (*e.g.,* purchase orders, SF 182s) for training services when the content and/or presentation of the training is controlled by DOT.          (b) Contracting officers shall incorporate the successful offeror's certified data into any resultant contract(s). Certified data may be adopted by reference, if the contracting officer determines it contains information sufficient to reliably describe the certified data submitted. For example, this type of information includes dated material such as resumes and company or personnel qualifications.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1213.70—Department of Transportation Procedures for Acquiring Training Services
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS 

No. 17-1413V 

 Filed: June 7, 2018 

UNPUBLISHED 

CYNTHIA LEVIN, 

 Petitioner, 

v. 

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES, 

 Respondent. 

Special Processing Unit (SPU); 

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; 

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; 

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine 

Administration (SIRVA) 

   

Isaiah Richard Kalinowski, Maglio Christopher & Toale, PA, Washington, DC, for 

petitioner. 

Darryl R. Wishard, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. 

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master: 

 On October 3, 2017, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,

2 (the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that, as a result of receiving the influenza (“flu”) 

vaccine on October 5, 2016, she suffered from a right shoulder injury related to vaccine 

administration (“SIRVA”). Petition at 1-2. The case was assigned to the Special 

Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. 

On June 4, 2018, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that 

petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. 

Specifically, respondent has concluded that petitioner’s alleged injury is consistent with 

                                                            

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the 

undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with 

the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of 

Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to 

identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits 

within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012). 
a SIRVA and meets the requirements of a Table injury. Id. at 5. Respondent further 

agrees that petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the 

Vaccine Act. Id.

 In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the 

undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/Nora Beth Dorsey 

 Nora Beth Dorsey 

 Chief Special Master
29–008

108TH CONGRESS REPORT " HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ! 2d Session 108–661

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 5006, DEPARTMENTS OF LABOR, 

HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, AND EDUCATION, AND RELATED 

AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2005

SEPTEMBER 7, 2004.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Ms. PRYCE of Ohio, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 754]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 754, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 5006, the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, 

and Related Agencies Appropriations Act for fiscal year 2005, 

under an open rule. The rule provides one hour of general debate 

equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. 

The rule waives all points of order against consideration of the 

bill. Under the rules of the House the bill shall be read for amendment by paragraph. The rule waives points of order against provisions in the bill for failure to comply with clause 2 of rule XXI (prohibiting unauthorized appropriations or legislative provisions in an 

appropriations bill), except as specified in the resolution. The rule 

authorizes the Chair to accord priority in recognition to Members 

who have pre-printed their amendments in the Congressional 

Record. 

Finally, the rule provides one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

The waiver of all points of order against consideration of the bill 

includes a waiver of clause 4(a) of rule XIII (requiring a three-day 

availability of the committee report). The waiver of clause 2 of rule 

XXI (prohibiting unauthorized appropriations or legislative provisions in an appropriations bill) is needed because there are numerous legislative provisions included in the bill. 

2

COMMITTEE VOTES

Pursuant to clause 3(b) of House rule XIII the results of each 

record vote on an amendment or motion to report, together with 

the names of those voting for and against, are printed below: 

Rules Committee record vote No. 314

Date: September 7, 2004. 

Measure: H.R. 5006, Departments of Labor, Health and Human 

Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 

2005. 

Motion by: Mr. McGovern. 

Summary of motion: To make in order and provide the appropriate waivers for the amendment offered by Rep. Obey, which 

adds $7.4 billion for education, workforce training, and to provide 

assistance to those without health care insurance. The amendment 

is offset by reducing the tax cuts only in 2005, and only for taxpayers with incomes over $1 million, from an average tax cut of 

$127,000 to $89,000. 

Results: Defeated 2 to 6. 

Vote by Members: Pryce—nay; Diaz-Balart—nay; Hastings 

(WA)—nay; Myrick—nay; Reynolds—nay; McGovern—yea; 

Hastings (FL)—yea; Dreier—nay.

Æ
Editorial Note on Part 107
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 107 appear at 81 FR 49895, July 29, 2016.

§ 107.260 Revision of an infant formula recall. If after a review of the recalling firm's recall strategy or periodic reports or other monitoring of the recall, the Food and Drug Administration concludes that the actions of the recalling firm are deficient, the agency shall notify the recalling firm of any serious deficiency. The agency may require the firm to: ( a ) Change the extent of the recall, if the agency concludes on the basis of available data that the depth of the recall is not adequate in light of the risk to human health presented by the infant formula.
( b ) Carry out additional effectiveness checks, if the agency's audits, or other information, demonstrate that the recall has not been effective.
( c ) Issue additional notifications to the firm's direct accounts, if the agency's audits, or other information demonstrate that the original notifications were not received, or were disregarded in a significant number of cases.