alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### [*] JOHNSON *against*COLE.

ON CERTIORARI.

Objection to venire without seal, too late after verdict.

*Read,*for plaintiff.

Kirkpatrick, C. J.

— The reasons assigned for the reversal of this cause are not grounded on the record, except the last, viz.: that the venire was not under seal.

As to this, upon the principles laid down heretofore, with respect to venires, though not on this particular objection, I am inclined to think the exception should have been taken on the return. Affirm.

Ros,s kivc and Pennington, Justices. — Concurred.

Judgment affirmed.

Contra, *Sowell*v. *Robertson, 1 Halst. 142.*
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATION(Principal Financial Officer)**

I, Maury Austin, certify that:

1.                I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Southwall Technologies Inc.;

2.                Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and

3.                Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report.

4.                The ChiefExecutive Officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrants and we have:

a.                  Designated suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designated under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made know to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which the combined quarterly report is being prepared;

b.                 Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in the quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythe quarterly report on such evaluations; and

c.                  Disclosed in thequarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.                The ChiefExecutive Officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:

a.                  All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b.                 Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
|        | Date: September 7, 2004 | By: | /s/ Maury  Austin |   |
|--------|------------------------------|-----|-------------------|--------|
|   | Maury Austin                 |
|   | *Chief Financial Officer*    |

 

----
Editorial Note on Part 17
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 17 appear at 68 FR 24879, May 9, 2003, and at 88 FR 45065, July 14, 2023.

§ 17.9 Answer. ( a ) The respondent may request a hearing by filing an answer with the Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852, within 30 days of service of the complaint. Unless stated otherwise, an answer shall be deemed to be a request for hearing.
( b ) In the answer, the respondent: ( 1 ) Shall admit or deny each of the allegations of liability made in the complaint; allegations not specifically denied in an answer are deemed admitted;
( 2 ) Shall state all defenses on which the respondent intends to rely;
( 3 ) Shall state all reasons why the respondent contends that the penalties and assessments should be less than the requested amount; and
( 4 ) Shall state the name, address, and telephone number of the respondent's counsel, if any.
( c ) If the respondent is unable to file an answer meeting the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section within the time provided, the respondent shall, before the expiration of 30 days from service of the complaint, file a request for an extension of time within which to file an answer that meets the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section. The presiding officer may, for good cause shown, grant the respondent up to 30 additional days within which to file an answer that meets the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section.
( d ) The respondent may, on motion, amend its answer to conform with the evidence as justice may require.
_'-_V_I_I_.I_._IA_l'_'l_A_._S_P_O_J_A_,_J_R_.

_____Attornf''J

## al-~_dJ!J.~:-

# __**\.~,.;-·**F;,_·.-'-"--------------- THIRDAND BROADWAY P.O. BOX882 LEWISTOWN, MONTANA 59457

<:: -·

:_: April 11, 2013 Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30 West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140 1200 New JerseyAvenue SE Washington, DC 20590 Re: Docket DOT-OST-1997-2605 TELEPHONE(406)538-8767 FAX(406)538·5861

This is to inform the Department ofmy objection to the termination of EAS Eligibility for Lewistown, Montana. The termination of this service leaves this far-flung county of more than 15,000 people without ANY INTERCITY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION WHATSOEVER. I find this to be a serious matter since it leaves hundreds of folks stranded in this citywith no way to leave except byprivate vehicle, should one evenbe available. Then it wouldbe at the mercy of others who maybe going to the places our people need to go. For instance, how do the elderly get to their cardiologist or oncologist? In the large centers of the United States this is probably difficult to even imagine. In the remote center ofMontana, however, it is reality. If this service were connected to Denver, CO, it wouldbe possible for people to make the arrangements necessary. If however, they cannot even get out of town, they are even stranded without the availability of some necessary life saving services. We have had a flight connecting us to Billings, MT. This apparently was unsatisfactory for some. This was something I coulduse. My plea is that you either restore the Billings service or, perhaps even better, return to the Denver connection.
Thank you for your help. Sincerely, WilliamA. Spoja, Jr. C: dennis.devany@dot.gov, scott.faulk@dot.gov, eas@dot.gov Senator Baucus; Senator Tester
Airlines forAmerica VVe C umwdthe\Nor!d

June 13, 2016 U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Operations West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140 1200 New JerseyAve., S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590 Sentto web site: http:/ jwww.regulations.gov 

### j Re: Exemption No. 5533, Docket FAA-2000-7980 Ladies/Gentlemen: In accordance with the Code ofFederal Regulations, 14CFR § 11.63 and 11
.81, Airlines for America, on behalfoftheir member airlines petition the Administrator for an extension ofExemption No. 5533K. This exemption is scheduled to expire on October 31, 2016. Exemption No. 5533Kprovides relieffrom 14 CFR § 121.311(b) to allow the member airlines ofthe Airlines for America and other similarly situated Part 121 air carriers to permit qualified flight attendants not required by §121.391(c) to perform duties related to the safety ofthe airplane and its occupants during aircraft movement on the surface. This request does not seekto change the conditions and limitations ofthe current exemption. The conditions and circumstances, with regard to public interest and equivalentlevels ofsafety, which warranted the original partial grant ofexemption, continue to exist. This exemption has been in use for twenty four years with no known compromise ofsafety.

Operator Members: AlaskaAirlines, American Airlines, AtlasAir, Federal Express, Hawaiian Airlines, JetBlue Airways, SouthwestAirlines, United Airlines, and United Parcel Service. Associate Members: Air Canada.
1275 Pennsylvania Ave, NW. Suite 1300, Washington, D.C. 20004-1707Docket No. FAA-2000-7980- Exemption No
. 5533 June 13, 2016 Page 2 Furthermore, the renewal ofthis exemption is not a controversial issue. This petition does not seek to establish a precedent, but merely would continue an accepted and established practice. Accordingly, Airlines for America requests that publication and commentperiod be waived. (14 CFR §11.87) A summary ofthis partition as required by 14 CFR §11.81 is attached. Ifanyfurther information ordiscussion is required, please call me at (202) 626 4031. Respectfully resubmitted by:



# ~ **jl vy~**  Sophia Ghezai Director, Aviation Safety and Operations 1275 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW. Suite 1300 Washington, D.C. 20004-1707 (202) 626-4031 sghezai@airlines.org Attachment

1275 Pennsylvania Ave, NW. Suite 1300, Washington, D.C. 20004-1707Attachment Docket No. FAA-2000-7980 June 13, 2016

Petitioner: Regulation Affected: Description ofReliefSought: 

### SUMMARY OF A4A PETITION

Airlines for America 14CFR § 121.311(b) Renew Exemption No. 5533K with no changes to the existing terms except to extend its termination date. Exemption 5533L provides relief from Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, §121.311(b), to the extent necessary to permit non-required flight attendants to perform safety-related duties during aircraft surface movement

1275 Pennsylvania Ave, NW. Suite 1300, Washington, D.C. 20004-1707
222 So.2d 63

#### Clayton J. GUILBEAU et al. v. JEANERETTE LUMBER & SHINGLE CO., Ltd. and Shell Oil Company.

No. 49801.

May 9, 1969.

In re: Clayton J. Guilbeau et al., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of St. Martin. 219 So.2d 545.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
###### Editorial Note on Part 112

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 112 appear at 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

#### § 112.174 What information submitted in a petition requesting a variance or submitted in comments on such a petition are publicly available?

We will presume that information submitted in a petition requesting a variance and comments submitted on such a petition, including a request that a variance be applied to its similarly situated persons, does not contain information exempt from public disclosure under part 20 of this chapter and will be made public as part of the docket associated with this request.
§ 1138.700 Purposes of SUB Article VII in relation to other articles. ( a ) *Purposes.* SUB Article VII of the general terms and conditions specifies provisions concerning reporting that recipients must include in their subaward terms and conditions, as applicable. It thereby implements OMB guidance in the following sections of 2 CFR part 200, as they apply to subawards: ( 1 ) 2 CFR 200.301 and 200.327 through 200.329; and
( 2 ) 2 CFR 200.315(c), as it relates to invention reporting; and
( 3 ) 2 CFR 200.343(a), as it relates to financial and performance reporting.
( b ) *Award terms and conditions.* A DoD Component's general terms and conditions must use the wording appendix G to this part provides as Section A of SUB Article VII to inform recipients about the relationship between requirements for the recipient in REP Articles I through III and requirements for subawards in SUB Article VII.
§ 1600.20 Does this part apply to me? This part and, through this part, pertinent portions of the OMB guidance in subparts A through I of 2 CFR part 180 (see table at 2 CFR 180.100(b)) apply to you if you are a— ( a ) Participant or principal in a “covered transaction” (see 2 CFR part 180, subpart B, and the definition of “non-procurement transaction” at 2 CFR 180.970);
( b ) Respondent in a DFC suspension or debarment action;
( c ) DFC suspending or debarring official; and
( d ) DFC investment, guarantee, insurance or grant official authorized to enter into any type of non-procurement transaction that is a covered transaction.
Message Information Date 07/18/2011 06:49 PM From "Jack Painter" cjwpainterfusenet> To LisaP Jackson/DC/USEPA/US@EPA
See attached letter

Jack W. Painter 5820 Graves Lake Drive Cincinnati, Ohio 45243 Mobile: 513J39-4013 Fax: 513561-1 396
Email. iwpainter@fuse.net Letter from Liberty Alliance Cincinnati,pdf

OEX Processing Information Processed Date: Processed By PC Office category:

### Jack W. Painter 5820 Craves Lake Drive Cincinnati, Ohio 45243

The Honorable Ray LaHood Secretary of the Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, D.C. 20590
The Honorable Lisa Jackson Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC. 20004 Dear Secretary LaHood and Administrator Jackson, I am writing on behalf of members of Liberty Alliance of Cincinnati, a group of over 500 concerned citizens (including current and retired Ohio business owners) dedicated to constitutionally limited government, fiscal responsibility and free enterprise. We are opposed to raising 2017-2025 fuel standards to unreasonable levels that puts jobs, businesses, local governments and individual citizens at economic risk. As successful businesspeople we understand and support the need to protect the environment and reduce U.S. dependence on petroleum. But the scope of proposed new fuel standards - which come on top of stringent 2012-2016 guidelines which have not yet even gone into effect - is unrealistic in this economy and will cost jobs and stifle growth here in Ohio and across the nation. Complying with increased 2017-2025 fuel standards could add thousands of dollars to the price of a new vehicle, killing sales and causing automakers to pull back on expansion and new hiring. This overreaching regulation would, in time, dictate the size and type of vehicle Americans buy in spite of individual preferences and needs. Diminishing vehicle affordability could stunt business growth and limit the vital services provided to citizens by local governments.Raising fuel standards beyond what is reasonable or justified demonstrates the if-someis-good, more-is-better regulatory philosophy that has prevailed in the current administration. Our membership asks that you withdraw this proposed rulemaking in favor of initiatives to protect the environment that are fiscally responsible and in keeping with the free enterprise system that has served this nation welt. Jack Painter, Co-founder Liberty Alliance Cincinnati

se. net
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1133 

To repeal changes made by health care reform laws to the Medicare exception 

to the prohibition on certain physician referrals for hospitals, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 16, 2017 

Mr. LANKFORD (for himself, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. 

CASSIDY, Mr. COTTON, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. TILLIS, and Mr. 

YOUNG) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To repeal changes made by health care reform laws to the 

Medicare exception to the prohibition on certain physician referrals for hospitals, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Patient Access to 

5 Higher Quality Health Care Act of 2017’’. 


rfrederick on DSK30NT082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1133 IS

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF HEALTH CARE REFORM PROVISIONS 

2 LIMITING MEDICARE EXCEPTION TO THE 

3 PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN PHYSICIAN RE4 FERRALS FOR HOSPITALS. 

5 Sections 6001 and 10601 of the Patient Protection 

6 and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111–148; 124 Stat. 

7 684, 1005) and section 1106 of the Health Care and Edu8 cation Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Public Law 111–152; 

9 124 Stat. 1049) are repealed and the provisions of law 

10 amended by such sections are restored as if such sections 

11 had never been enacted. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK30NT082PROD with BILLS
###### Editorial Note on Part 172

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 172 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; 70 FR 72074, Dec. 1, 2005; and 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

#### § 172.780 Acacia (gum arabic).

The food additive may be safely used in food in accordance with the following prescribed conditions:

(a) Acacia (gum arabic) is the dried gummy exudate from stems and branches of trees of various species of the genus *Acacia*, family Leguminosae.

(b) The ingredient meets the specifications of the Food Chemicals Codex, 8th ed. (2012), p. 516, which is incorporated by reference. The Director of the Office of the Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. You may obtain copies from the United States Pharmacopeial Convention, 12601 Twinbrook Pkwy., Rockville, MD 20852 (Internet address: *http://www.usp.org*). Copies may be examined at the Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852, 240-402-7500, between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday. For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.*

(c) The ingredient is used in food in accordance with good manufacturing practices under the following conditions:

| Food (as served) | Percent | Function |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Beverages, alcoholic | 20.0 | Thickener, emulsifier, or stabilizer. |
| Breakfast cereals, § 170.3(n)(4) of this chapter | 6.0 | Dietary fiber; emulsifier and emulsifier salt; flavoring agent and adjuvant; formulation aid; processing aid; stabilizer and thickener; surface-finishing agent; texturizer. |
| Cakes, brownies, pastries, biscuits, muffins, and cookies | 3.0 | Do. |
| Grain-based bars (e.g., breakfast bars, granola bars, rice cereal bars) | 35.0 | Do. |
| Soups and soup mixes, § 170.3(n)(40) of this chapter, except for soups and soup mixes containing meat or poultry that are subject to regulation by the U.S. Department of Agriculture under the Federal Meat Inspection Act or the Poultry Products Inspection Act | 2.5 | Do. |
| Food categories listed in § 184.1330 of this chapter, except for meat, poultry, and foods for which standards of identity established under section 401 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act preclude the use of acacia | Levels prescribed in § 184.1330 of this chapter | Dietary fiber. |

Maximum Usage Levels Permitted

[70 FR 8034, Feb. 17, 2005, as amended at 78 FR 71464, Nov. 29, 2013; 78 FR 73437, Dec. 6, 2013; 88 FR 17720, Mar. 24, 2023]
Editorial Note on Part 177
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 177 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 70 FR 72074, Dec. 1, 2005; and 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 177.1610 Polyethylene, chlorinated. Chlorinated polyethylene identified in this section may be safely used as articles or components of articles that contact food, except for articles used for packing or holding food during cooking, subject to the provisions of this section. ( a ) For the purpose of this section, chlorinated polyethylene consists of basic polymers produced by the direct chlorination of polyethylene conforming to the density, maximum *n-*hexane extractable fraction, and maximum xylene soluble fraction specifications prescribed under item 2.1 of the table in § 177.1520(c). Such chlorinated polyethylene contains a maximum of 60 percent by weight of total chlorine, as determined by ASTM 1method D1303-55 (Reapproved 1979), “Standard Test Method for Total Chlorine in Vinyl Chloride Polymers and Copolymers,” which is incorporated by reference (Copies may be obtained from the American Society for Testing Materials, 100 Barr Harbor Dr., West Conshohocken, Philadelphia, PA 19428-2959, or may be examined at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .*), and has a 7.0 percent maximum extractable fraction in *n*-hexane at 50 °C, as determined by the method described in § 177.1520(d)(3)(ii).
( b ) Chlorinated polyethylene may be used in contact with all types of food, except that when used in contact with fatty food of Types III, IV-A, V, VII-A, and IX described in table 1 of § 176.170(c) of this chapter, chlorinated polyethylene is limited to use only as a modifier admixed at levels not exceeding 15 weight percent in plastic articles prepared from polyvinyl chloride and/or from vinyl chloride copolymers complying with § 177.1980.
[42 FR 14572, Mar. 15, 1977, as amended at 49 FR 10109, Mar. 19, 1984; 59 FR 14550, Mar. 29, 1994]
Editorial Note on Part 108
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 108 appear at 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 108.7 Issuance or denial of permit. ( a ) After a determination and notification by the Commissioner in accordance with the provisions of § 108.5 that a manufacturer, processor, or packer requires a permit, such manufacturer, processor, or packer may not thereafter introduce or deliver for introduction into interstate commerce any such food manufactured, processed, or packed by him unless he holds a permit issued by the Commissioner or obtains advance written approval of the Food and Drug Administration pursuant to § 108.12(a).
( b ) Any manufacturer, processor, or packer for whom the Commissioner has made a determination that a permit is necessary may apply to the Commissioner for the issuance of such a permit. The application shall contain such data and information as is necessary to show that all mandatory requirements and conditions for the manufacturer, processing or packing of a food for which regulations are established in subpart B of this part are met and, in particular, shall show that the deviations specified in the Commissioner's determination of the need for a permit have been corrected or suitable interim measures established. Within 10 working days after receipt of such application, (except that the Commissioner may extend such time an additional 10 working days where necessary), the Commissioner shall issue a permit, deny the permit, or offer the applicant a hearing conducted in accordance with § 108.5 (b) and (c) as to whether the permit should be issued. The Commissioner shall issue such a permit to which shall be attached, in addition to the mandatory requirements and conditions of subpart B of this part, any additional requirements or conditions which may be necessary to protect the public health if he finds that all mandatory requirements and conditions of subpart B of this part are met or suitable interim measures are established.
( c ) Denial of a permit constitutes final agency action from which appeal lies to the courts. The Commissioner will not stay such denial pending court appeal except in unusual circumstances, but will participate in expediting any such appeal.