alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1104 

To require the Federal Communications Commission to establish a methodology for the collection by the Commission of information about commercial mobile service and commercial mobile data service, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 11, 2017 

Mr. MANCHIN (for himself, Mr. WICKER, Mr. SCHATZ, Mrs. FISCHER, Ms. 

KLOBUCHAR, Mr. PETERS, and Mr. MORAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 

Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To require the Federal Communications Commission to establish a methodology for the collection by the Commission of information about commercial mobile service and 

commercial mobile data service, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rural Wireless Access 

5 Act of 2017’’. 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1104 IS

1 SEC. 2. METHODOLOGY FOR COLLECTION OF MOBILE 

2 SERVICE COVERAGE DATA. 

3 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section— 

4 (1) the term ‘‘commercial mobile data service’’ 

5 has the meaning given the term in section 6001 of 

6 the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act 

7 of 2012 (47 U.S.C. 1401); 

8 (2) the term ‘‘commercial mobile service’’ has 

9 the meaning given the term in section 332(d) of the 

10 Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 332(d)); 

11 (3) the term ‘‘Commission’’ means the Federal 

12 Communications Commission; 

13 (4) the term ‘‘coverage data’’ means, if com14 mercial mobile service or commercial mobile data 

15 service is available, information about the service, 

16 which may include available speed tiers and perform17 ance characteristics; and 

18 (5) the term ‘‘Universal Service program’’ 

19 means the universal service support mechanisms es20 tablished under section 254 of the Communications 

21 Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 254) and the regulations 

22 issued under that section. 

23 (b) METHODOLOGY ESTABLISHED.—Not later than 

24 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the 

25 Commission shall promulgate regulations to establish a 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1104 IS

1 methodology that shall apply to the collection of coverage 

2 data by the Commission for the purposes of— 

3 (1) the Universal Service program; or 

4 (2) any other similar program. 

5 (c) REQUIREMENTS.—The methodology established 

6 under subsection (b) shall— 

7 (1) contain standard definitions for different 

8 speed tiers, such as the 2G, 3G, 4G, and 4G LTE 

9 tiers; 

10 (2) ensure that coverage data is collected in a 

11 consistent and robust way; 

12 (3) improve the validity and reliability of cov13 erage data; and 

14 (4) increase the efficiency of coverage data col15 lection. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
DISMISS and Opinion F iled October 28, 2022 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00652-CV CALRAYMOND ALLEN, Appellant V. FOREST GREEN MANOR, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-22-02706-E MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, Justi ce Molberg, and Justice Goldstein Opinion by Chief Justice Burns After appellant failed to timely file his brief, we directed appellant by postcard dated September 19, 2022 to fi le his brief within ten da ys and cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in the dismi ssal of this appeal without further notice.
See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(a)(1). To date, appellant has not filed his br ief or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding th e status of this appeal.–2– Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8 (a)(1); 42.3(b), (c).

220652F.P05 /Robert D. Burns, III / ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT CALRAYMOND ALLEN, Appellant
No. 05-22-00652-CV V. FOREST GREEN MANOR, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-22-02706- E. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns. Justices Molberg and Goldstein participating. In accordance with this Court’s opini on of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED

. Judgment entered October 28, 2022
[No. 40441-5-I.

Division One.

December 22, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Marvin Jones, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 97-8-00349-2, Anthony P. Wartnik, J., entered March 19, 1997. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
BRIAN DAVID BASS ,

Appellant ,

v. Case No. 5D 22

- 2772 LT Case No. 2018

- CF

- 003940
STATE OF FLORIDA ,

Appellee

. ________________________________/
Decision filed May 23, 2023 3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County , Lisa Herndon , Judge.
Brian D avid Bass, Perry, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED.

EISNAUGLE , SOUD and KILBANE , JJ., concur.
#### § 1108.110 Cooperative agreement.

*Cooperative agreement* means a legal instrument which, consistent with 31 U.S.C. 6305, is used to enter into the same kind of relationship as a grant (see definition of “grant” in this subpart), except that substantial involvement is expected between DoD and the recipient when carrying out the activity contemplated by the cooperative agreement. The term does not include “cooperative research and development agreements” as defined in 15 U.S.C. 3710a.
<PAGE>   1

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549


                                 ---------------


                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT


                     Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the

                         Securities Exchange Act of 1934


Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)        FEBRUARY 19, 1999
                                                 -------------------------------


                              CELLPRO, INCORPORATED
               (Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)



         DELAWARE                          0-19472               94-3087971
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(State or other jurisdiction             (Commission           (IRS Employer
     of incorporation)                   File Number)        Identification No.)



   22215 26TH AVENUE S.E., BOTHELL, WA                               98021
(Address of principal executive offices)                           (Zip Code)



Registrant's telephone number, including area code          (425) 485-7644
                                                    ----------------------------


                                       N/A
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
         (Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)


<PAGE>   2



Item 3:

        On February 19, 1999, CellPro, Incorporated (the "Company") filed its
        Plan of Reorganization dated February 19, 1999 and the proposed
        Disclosure Statement dated as of February 19, 1999 related thereto. The
        filing was made in connection with the Company's Chapter 11 bankruptcy
        case currently pending with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western
        District of Washington. A hearing on the adequacy of the Disclosure 
        Statement has been set for March 26, 1999.







<PAGE>   3



                                   SIGNATURES

               Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.



                                   CellPro, Incorporated
                                   ------------------------------------
                                        (Registrant)


Date:  February 19, 1999           /s/ Mark J. Handfelt
                                   ------------------------------------
                                   Name:  Mark J. Handfelt
                                   Title: Executive Vice President and General
                                          Counsel
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAn assessment model for atmospheric compositionPredicting future perturbations to global air quality and climate requires, as a prerequisite, prognostic models for the composition of the Earth's atmosphere. Such assessment models are needed to evaluate the impact on our environment of different social choices that affect emissions of the photochemically and radiatively important trace gases. Our presentation here of a prototype assessment model is intended to encourage public scientific discussions of the necessary components of the model and their interactions, with the recognition that models similar to this will likely be used by the Environmental Protection Agency and other regulatory agencies in order to assess the effect of changes in atmospheric composition on climate over the next century.Document ID19890011217Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference Publication (CP)AuthorsPrather, Michael J.*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1988Subject CategoryMeteorology And ClimatologyReport/Patent NumberREPT-89-31NAS 1.55:3023NASA-CP-3023Meeting InformationMeeting: NASA Goddard Inst. for Space StudiesLocation: New York, NYCountry: United StatesStart Date: January 10, 1988End Date: January 13, 1988Accession Number89N20588Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19890011217.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Editorial Note on Part 172
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 172 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; 70 FR 72074, Dec. 1, 2005; and 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 172.894 Modified cottonseed products intended for human consumption. The food additive modified cottonseed products may be used for human consumption in accordance with the following prescribed conditions: ( a ) The additive is derived from: ( 1 ) Decorticated, partially defatted, cooked, ground cottonseed kernels; or
( 2 ) Decorticated, ground cottonseed kernels, in a process that utilizes *n-*hexane as an extracting solvent in such a way that no more than 60 parts per million of *n-*hexane residues and less than 1 percent fat by weight remain in the finished product; or
( 3 ) Glandless cottonseed kernels roasted to attain a temperature of not less than 250 °F in the kernel for not less than 5 minutes for use as a snack food, or in baked goods, or in soft candy; or
( 4 ) Raw glandless cottonseed kernels may be used in hard candy where the kernel temperature during cooking will exceed 250 °F for not less than 5 minutes.
( b ) The additive is prepared to meet the following specifications: ( 1 ) Free gossypol content not to exceed 450 parts per million.
( 2 ) It contains no added arsenic compound and therefore may not exceed a maximum natural background level of 0.2 part per million total arsenic, calculated as As.
( c ) To assure safe use of the additive, the label of the food additive container shall bear, in addition to other information required by the act, the name of the additive as follows: ( 1 ) The additive identified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section as “partially defatted, cooked cottonseed flour”.
( 2 ) The additive identified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section as “defatted cottonseed flour”.
( 3 ) The additive identified in paragraph (a)(3) of this section as “roasted glandless cottonseed kernels”.
( 4 ) The additive identified in paragraph (a)(4) of this section as “raw glandless cottonseed kernels for use in cooked hard candy”.
( d ) The Food and Drug Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency have determined that glandless cottonseed kernels permitted for use by this section are a distinct commodity from glanded cottonseed.
### Ground water in the Norwalk, Suffield, and Glastonbury areas, Connecticut

By: Harold Schjoth Palmer

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp470

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 7**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Pages:                               - **Glastonbury area**                            (html)
  - **Norwalk area**                            (html)
  - **Suffield area**                            (html) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
###### Editorial Note on Part 170

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 170 appear at 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001, and 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004.

#### § 170.215 Incorporation into a GRAS notice.

You may incorporate into your GRAS notice either specifically identified data and information that you previously submitted to the Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (CFSAN), or specifically identified publicly available data and information submitted by another party, when such data and information remain in CFSAN's records, such as data and information contained in a previous GRAS notice or a food additive petition.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 800 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 800

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require the House 
  to replace the Speaker on the first day of the second session of a 
   Congress if the most recent fiscal year ended with a significant 
            Federal budget deficit, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 22, 2018

 Mr. Cooper submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                         the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require the House 
  to replace the Speaker on the first day of the second session of a 
   Congress if the most recent fiscal year ended with a significant 
            Federal budget deficit, and for other purposes.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF SPEAKER AT BEGINNING OF SECOND SESSION IN 
              CASE OF SIGNIFICANT FEDERAL BUDGET DEFICIT.

    (a) Replacement.--Rule I of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is amended by adding at the end the following new 
clause:
``Replacement of Speaker at beginning of second session
    ``13.(a) On the first day of the second session of a Congress, the 
position of Speaker shall be declared vacant and the individual who 
served as Speaker as of the last day of the first session of the 
Congress shall not be eligible to serve as Speaker in the second 
session if the most recent fiscal year ended with a significant Federal 
budget deficit.
    ``(b) For purposes of this clause, a fiscal year ended with a 
significant Federal budget deficit if the total estimated outlays of 
the Government for the fiscal year exceeded the total estimated 
receipts for that fiscal year by an amount equal to or greater than 5 
percent of the gross domestic product for the United States for that 
fiscal year.
    ``(c) Paragraph (a) shall not apply if the House determines that 
the significant Federal budget deficit for a fiscal year was 
attributable to a national emergency or a recession.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to the One Hundred Sixteenth Congress and each 
succeeding Congress.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 1150.1 Scope.

This part establishes requirements related to tobacco product user fees under section 919 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 387s). The total amount of user fees may not exceed the amount specified for that fiscal year in section 919(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. All domestic manufacturers and importers of tobacco products are required to pay to FDA their percentage share of the total assessment for a fiscal year.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Ralph John *Cataraso,*Appellant.

In a *coram nobis*proceeding to vacate a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered January 29, 1965, convicting defendant of attempted burglary in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and sentencing him to a prison term of 2% to 5 years, the appeal is from an order of said court dated October 16,1967, which denied the application without a hearing. Order reversed, on the law, and proceeding remitted to the Criminal Term for a hearing and determination on the issue whether defendant was, as he asserts, induced to plead guilty and to co-operate with the authorities by a promise of a suspended sentence made to him by two detectives, who said they were speaking in behalf of the District Attorney and appeared to have been authorized to do so. Defendant claims that, in reliance upon the promise upon a visit by the two detectives which had been arranged by his attorney and a named Assistant District Attorney, and at the grave risk of harm to his person and his family, he (defendant) gave his full co-operation in the investigation of a murder; that he has tried to obtain the names of the detectives from his attorney, who replied that he did not know the names, and from the prison authorities, who refused his request; that the officers told him not to mention the promise in open court when he would appear for sentence; that the court was not informed of the .promise and his co-operation; and that as a result he was sentenced as above stated. He submitted a letter from his attorney in confirmation of the above-stated visit. His claim that he tried to obtain the names of the detectives is supported by said attorney’s letter and a written refusal by the prison authorities. In opposition, the People submitted an affidavit by the prosecutor in which he denied that *he*had made any such promise. However, no such affidavits by the detectives concerned were furnished; nor any explanation for the failure to do so. In our opinion, on all the facts presented in this record, a hearing is required. 'Christ, P. J., Munder, Martuseello, Latham and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1133 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1133

   To repeal changes made by health care reform laws to the Medicare 
    exception to the prohibition on certain physician referrals for 
                   hospitals, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 16, 2017

 Mr. Lankford (for himself, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Boozman, Mr. 
Cassidy, Mr. Cotton, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Tillis, and Mr. Young) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To repeal changes made by health care reform laws to the Medicare 
    exception to the prohibition on certain physician referrals for 
                   hospitals, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Patient Access to Higher Quality 
Health Care Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF HEALTH CARE REFORM PROVISIONS LIMITING MEDICARE 
              EXCEPTION TO THE PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN PHYSICIAN 
              REFERRALS FOR HOSPITALS.

    Sections 6001 and 10601 of the Patient Protection and Affordable 
Care Act (Public Law 111-148; 124 Stat. 684, 1005) and section 1106 of 
the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Public Law 
111-152; 124 Stat. 1049) are repealed and the provisions of law amended 
by such sections are restored as if such sections had never been 
enacted.
                                 <all>
```