alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 10, 2017

No. 04-16-00812-CR

Gary ALVAREZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR4637B

Honorable Kevin M. O'Connell, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Gary Alvarez entered into a plea bargain with the State, pursuant to which he pleaded 

nolo contendere to the charge of injury to a child. The trial court imposed sentence in 

accordance with the agreement and signed a certificate stating this “is a plea-bargain case, and 

the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). Alvarez timely filed a 

notice of appeal. The clerk’s record, which includes the trial court’s rule 25.2(a)(2) certification 

and a written plea bargain agreement, has been filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). This court 

must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not 

been made part of the record.” Id.

The clerk’s record establishes the punishment assessed by the court does not exceed the 

punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. See TEX. R. APP. P.

25.2(a)(2). The record also appears to support the trial court’s certification that Alvarez does not 

have a right to appeal. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding that 

court of appeals should review clerk’s record to determine whether trial court’s certification is 

accurate). 

Alvarez is hereby given notice that this appeal will be dismissed pursuant to rule 25.2(d)

of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure unless an amended certification showing that he has 

the right to appeal is made part of the appellate record by January 31, 2017. See TEX. R. APP. P.

25.2(d); Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, order), disp. on 

merits, No. 04-03-00176-CR, 2003 WL 21508347 (July 2, 2003, pet. ref’d) (not designated for 

publication).
We order all appellate deadlines suspended until further order of the court. We further 

order the clerk of this court to serve copies of this order on the attorneys of record and the court 

reporter.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 10th day of January, 2017.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 412 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 412

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         June 27, 2017.
    Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is hereby, elected to the 
following standing committee of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Armed Services: Mr. Walz.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION
OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. C. SECTION
1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of SigmaBroadband Co., (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2016 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Timothy D. Valley, President and
Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1)  The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)  The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.











SIGMABROADBAND
CO.May 5,
2017By:/s/ 
Timothy D.
ValleyTimothy
D. ValleyChief Financial
Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6959

WILLIAM HAROLD PEOPLES,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; ARTHUR F. BEELER,

Warden,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,

Chief District Judge. (CA-03-229)

Submitted: August 14, 2003 Decided: August 22, 2003

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Harold Peoples, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

William H. Peoples seeks to appeal the district court’s order

accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss his 28

U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. Peoples cannot appeal this order

unless a circuit judge or justice issues a certificate of

appealability, and a certificate of appealability will not issue

absent a “substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). An appellant meets this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, , 123 S. Ct.

1029, 1039 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000);

Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S.

941 (2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude

that Peoples has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 642 

Prohibiting the use of the Members’ Representational Allowance of a Member 

of the House of Representatives to pay awards, settlements, or other 

compensation in connection with allegations of sexual harassment or 

sexual misconduct by the Member or the employees of the Member’s 

office, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 1, 2017 

Mrs. WALORSKI submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Prohibiting the use of the Members’ Representational Allowance of a Member of the House of Representatives to 

pay awards, settlements, or other compensation in connection with allegations of sexual harassment or sexual 

misconduct by the Member or the employees of the Member’s office, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 642 IH 

1 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION AGAINST USE OF MEMBERS’ REP2 RESENTATIONAL ALLOWANCE FOR PAY3 MENTS IN CONNECTION WITH ALLEGATIONS 

4 OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT OR SEXUAL MIS5 CONDUCT. 

6 (a) PROHIBITION.— 

7 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Members’ Representa8 tional Allowance of a Member of the House of Rep9 resentatives may not be used to pay awards, settle10 ments, or other compensation in connection with al11 legations of sexual harassment or sexual misconduct 

12 by the Member or any individual whose compensa13 tion is paid from the Allowance. 

14 (2) REPAYMENT OF AMOUNTS PREVIOUSLY

15 PAID.—If, prior to the adoption of this resolution, 

16 the Members’ Representational Allowance of a Mem17 ber of the House was used to pay an award, settle18 ment, or compensation described in paragraph (1), 

19 the individual against whom the allegation was made 

20 shall repay the Treasury of the United States an 

21 amount equal to the amount of such award, settle22 ment, or compensation, using personal funds of the 

23 individual. 

24 (b) PUBLIC DISCLOSURE OF SETTLEMENTS INVOLV25 ING OFFICES OF MEMBERS.— 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 642 IH 

1 (1) REQUIREMENT.—Not later than 30 days 

2 after the Committee on House Administration ap3 proves a settlement entered into under the Congres4 sional Accountability Act of 1995 by the office of a 

5 Member of the House in connection with a violation 

6 of section 201(a) of such Act involving sexual har7 assment or sexual misconduct, the Committee shall 

8 publish and post on its public website the following 

9 information: 

10 (A) A description of the violation involved. 

11 (B) The identification of the office and the 

12 individual committing the violation. 

13 (C) The amount of the settlement. 

14 (2) PROTECTION OF IDENTITY OF INDIVIDUALS

15 RECEIVING SETTLEMENTS.—In publishing and post16 ing the information required under this subsection, 

17 the Committee on House Administration shall en18 sure that the identity of any individual who received 

19 a settlement, or who made an allegation of a viola20 tion, is not disclosed. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

21. List of Subsidiaries of the Company

The following is a list of Integrated Measurement Systems, Inc. operating
subsidiaries. Integrated Measurement Systems, Inc. has no parent companies.

                  Subsidiary                           Percent Owned

Integrated Measurement Systems FSC, Inc.                   100%

Integrated Measurement Systems (Europe) AG                 100%

IMS Europe Ltd.                                            100%

Integrated Measurement Systems (France) Sarl               100%

Integrated Measurement Systems (Deutschland) GmbH          100%

Integrated Measurement Systems (Japan) KK                  100%

Integrated Measurement Systems (M) Sdn. Bdn.               100%

Integrated Measurement Systems (P) Inc.                    100%
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                     Washington, D.C.  20549


                          FORM 10-K/A


     ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
                SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 
           For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996


Purpose:  To supplement in part Part IV, Item 14(c) of Company's
          previously filed Form 10-K in order to file as an exhibit
          the Annual Servicing Report of Company's Independent
          Public Accountants. 


                  Commission File Nos. 0-36050


      HOUSEHOLD PRIVATE LABEL CREDIT CARD MASTER TRUST II 
     (Exact name of Registrant as specified in Department
      of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service Form SS-4)

HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION
(Servicer of the Trust)
(Exact name as specified in Servicer's charter)


            DELAWARE                      36-3670374             
(State or other jurisdiction of   (I.R.S. Employer Identification
incorporation of Servicer)        Number of Registrant


 2700 SANDERS ROAD, PROSPECT HEIGHTS, ILLINOIS         60070     
(Address of principal executive offices of           (Zip Code)
Servicer)


Servicer's telephone number, including area code  (847) 564-5000 












<PAGE>













                           SIGNATURES




     Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Servicer has duly caused this
amendment to be signed on behalf of the Household Private Label
Credit Card Master Trust II by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.




                          HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION,
                         as Servicer of and on behalf of the

                HOUSEHOLD PRIVATE LABEL CREDIT CARD MASTER TRUST II
                                    (Registrant)




Date:  May 9, 1997            By:/s/John W. Blenke              
                                 John W. Blenke
                                 Assistant Secretary
















U:\WP\HFS088\95-10K\PLCC.AMD



<PAGE>
                                 




                           Exhibit Index


Exhibit No.    Exhibit                                      Page No.

99             Copy of Independent Public Accountants          4
               Annual Servicing Report dated March 26, 1997.
§ 1114.37 Temporary suspension of a marketing granted order. ( a ) FDA will temporarily suspend a marketing granted order if FDA determines that there is a reasonable probability that the continued distribution of such tobacco product would cause serious, adverse health consequences or death, that is greater than ordinarily caused by tobacco products on the market.
( b ) Before temporarily suspending a marketing granted order of a tobacco product, FDA will offer the holder of the marketing granted order an opportunity for an informal hearing under part 16 of this chapter.
( c ) If, after offering the holder of the marketing granted order an opportunity for a part 16 hearing, the Agency decides to proceed with the temporary suspension, FDA will issue an order temporarily suspending the marketing granted order for a tobacco product.
( d ) After issuing an order temporarily suspending the marketing granted order, FDA will proceed expeditiously to withdraw the marketing granted order for the tobacco product.
§ 1313.31 Advance notice of importation for transshipment or transfer. ( a ) A quantity of a chemical listed in § 1310.02 of this chapter that meets or exceeds the threshold reporting requirements found in § 1310.04(f) of this chapter may be imported into the United States for transshipment, or may be transferred or transshipped within the United States for immediate exportation, provided that advance notice is given to the Administration.
( b ) Advance notification must be provided to the Regulatory Section, Diversion Control Division, Drug Enforcement Administration, not later than 15 calendar days prior to the proposed date the listed chemical will transship or transfer through the United States. See the Table of DEA Mailing Addresses in § 1321.01 of this chapter for the current mailing address. A separate notification is required for each shipment of listed chemicals to be transferred or transshipped. The written notification (not a DEA Form 486) must contain the following information: ( 1 ) The date the notice was executed;
( 2 ) The complete name and description of the listed chemical as it appears on the label or container.
( 3 ) The name of the listed chemical as designated by § 1310.02 of this chapter.
( 4 ) The number of containers and the size or weight of the container for each listed item;
( 5 ) The net weight of each listed chemical given in kilograms or parts thereof;
( 6 ) The gross weight of the shipment given in kilograms or parts thereof;
( 7 ) The name/business name, address/business address, and contact information (*e.g.,* telephone number(s), email address(es), etc.) and type of business of the foreign exporter;
( 8 ) The foreign port and country of export;
( 9 ) The approximate date of exportation;
( 10 ) The complete identification of the exporting carrier;
( 11 ) The name, address, business, telephone number, and, where available, the facsimile number of the importer, transferor, or transshipper;
( 12 ) The U.S. port of entry;
( 13 ) The approximate date of entry;
( 14 ) The name/business name, address/business address, and contact information (*e.g.,* telephone number(s), email address(es), etc.) and type of business of the consignee at the foreign port or country of entry;
( 15 ) The shipping route from the U.S. port of export to the foreign port or country of entry at final destination;
( 16 ) The approximate date of receipt by the consignee at the foreign port of entry; and
( 17 ) The signature of the importer, transferor or transshipper, or his agent, accompanied by the agent's title.
( c ) Unless notified to the contrary prior to the expected date of delivery, the importation for transshipment or transfer is considered approved.
( d ) No waiver of the 15-day advance notice will be given for imports of listed chemicals in quantities meeting or exceeding threshold quantities for transshipment or transfer outside the United States.
[54 FR 31665, Aug. 1, 1989, as amended at 67 FR 49569, July 31, 2002; 75 FR 10684, Mar. 9, 2010; 77 FR 4237, Jan. 27, 2012; 81 FR 97039, Dec. 30, 2016]
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 982 

Of inquiry requesting the President, and directing the Secretary of Health 

and Human Services, to transmit, respectively, certain information to 

the House of Representatives referring to the separation of children 

from their parents or guardians as a result of the President’s ‘‘zero 

tolerance’’ policy. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 3, 2018 

Mr. PALLONE submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Of inquiry requesting the President, and directing the Secretary of Health and Human Services, to transmit, respectively, certain information to the House of Representatives referring to the separation of children from 

their parents or guardians as a result of the President’s 

‘‘zero tolerance’’ policy. 

1 Resolved, That the President is requested, and the 

2 Secretary of Health and Human Services is directed, to 

3 transmit, respectively, to the House of Representatives, 

4 not later than 14 days after the date of the adoption of 

5 this resolution, copies of all documents, memoranda, advi6 sory legal opinions, notes from meetings, audio recordings, 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 982 IH 

1 records (including telephone and electronic mail records), 

2 correspondence, and other communications, or any portion 

3 of any such communications, to the extent that any such 

4 one or more items are within the possession of the Presi5 dent or the Secretary, respectively, and refer to the fol6 lowing: 

7 (1) The health and welfare of children forcibly 

8 separated from their parents or guardians as a re9 sult of the President’s ‘‘zero tolerance’’ policy. 

10 (2) The long-term implications of the Presi11 dent’s ‘‘zero tolerance’’ policy on the health of chil12 dren described in paragraph (1). 

Æ 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
(logo)WELLS FARGO BANK



                        MANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON COMPLIANCE
                        WITH MINIMUM SERVICING STANDARDS



As of and for the year ended  December 31, 1995,  Wells Fargo and  Companies has
complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing standards set forth
in the Mortgage  Bankers  Association of America's  UNIFORM  SINGLE  ATTESTATION
PROGRAM FOR MORTGAGE  BANKERS.  As of and for this same period,  Wells Fargo and
Companies  had in effect a fidelity  bond in the amount of  $115,000,000  and an
errors and omissions policy in the amount of $48,000,000.



Acknowledged: /s/William J. McClung
              William J. McClung, Senior Vice President










January 16, 1996



                   P.O. Box 85071  San Diego, CA 92186-5071




LS35
Editorial Note on Part 112
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 112 appear at 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 112.176 What process applies to a petition requesting a variance? ( a ) In general, the procedures set forth in § 10.30 of this chapter govern our response to a petition requesting a variance.
( b ) Under § 10.30(h)(3) of this chapter, we will publish a notice in the Federal Register, requesting information and views on a filed petition, including information and views from persons who could be affected by the variance if the petition were to be granted (*e.g.,* because their farm is covered by the petition or as a person similarly situated to persons covered by the petition).
( c ) Under § 10.30(e)(3) of this chapter, we will respond to the petitioner in writing and will also make public a notice on FDA's Web site announcing our decision to either grant or deny the petition. ( 1 ) If we grant the petition, either in whole or in part, we will specify the persons to whom the variance applies and the provision(s) of this part to which the variance applies.
( 2 ) If we deny the petition (including partial denials), our written response to the petitioner and our public notice announcing our decision to deny the petition will explain the reason(s) for the denial.
( d ) We will make readily accessible to the public, and periodically update, a list of filed petitions requesting variances, including the status of each petition (for example, pending, granted, or denied).
§ 184.8 Exemptions to the Buy America Preference. ( a ) The Buy America Preference does not apply to expenditures for assistance authorized under section 402, 403, 404, 406, 408, or 502 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5170a, 5170b, 16 5170c, 5172, 5174, or 5192) relating to a major disaster or emergency declared by the President under section 401 or 501, respectively, of such Act (42 U.S.C. 5170, 5191) or pre and post disaster or emergency response expenditures.
( b ) “Pre and post disaster or emergency response expenditures” consist of expenditures for financial assistance that are: ( 1 ) Authorized by statutes other than the Stafford Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121 *et seq.;* and
( 2 ) Made in anticipation of or response to an event or events that qualify as an “emergency” or “major disaster” within the meaning of the Stafford Act, 42 U.S.C. 5122(1), (2).
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0249 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JOHN EVERETT ELLSWORTH FRY,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including June 12 , 2024, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 2 2024

05/02/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0249
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 40643 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

MARIO ARTURO LOPEZ

- GONZALEZ ,
Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:16

- CR

- 1195

- 1

Before DAVIS, HAYNES, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Mario Arturo Lopez

Gonzalez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lopez

- Gonzalez h a s not f iled a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 17 , 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-40643 Document: 00514433992 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/17/2018No. 17

- 40643

2 nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 17-40643 Document: 00514433992 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/17/2018