alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 101 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 27, 2005 

Referred to the Committee on Resources 

AN ACT 

To convey to the town of Frannie, Wyoming, certain land 

withdrawn by the Commissioner of Reclamation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

S 101 RFH 

1 SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF LAND TO THE TOWN OF 

2 FRANNIE, WYOMING. 

3 (a) CONVEYANCE.—Subject to valid existing rights, 

4 the Secretary of the Interior shall convey by quitclaim 

5 deed, without consideration, all right, title, and interest 

6 of the United States in and to the parcel of land described 

7 in subsection (b) to the town of Frannie, Wyoming. 

8 (b) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The parcel of land re9 ferred to in subsection (a) is the parcel of land withdrawn 

10 by the Commissioner of Reclamation— 

11 (1) consisting of approximately 37,500 square 

12 feet; 

13 (2) located in the town of Frannie, Wyoming; 

14 and 

15 (3) more particularly described in the approved 

16 Plat of Survey of Frannie Townsite, Wyoming, as 

the North 1 17 ⁄2 of Block 26, T. 58 N, R. 97 W. 

18 (c) RESERVATION OF MINERAL RIGHTS.—The con19 veyance under subsection (a) shall be subject to the res20 ervation by the United States of any oil and gas rights. 

21 (d) REVOCATIONS.— 

22 (1) SPECIAL USE PERMIT.—The special use 

23 permit issued by the Commissioner of Reclamation, 

24 numbered O–LM–60–L1413, and dated April 20, 

25 1990, is revoked with respect to the land described 

26 in subsection (b). 
3 

S 101 RFH 

1 (2) SECRETARIAL ORDERS.—The following Sec2 retarial Orders issued by the Commissioner of Rec3 lamation are revoked with respect to the land de4 scribed in subsection (b): 

5 (A) The Secretarial Order for the with6 drawal of land for the Shoshone Reclamation 

7 Project dated October 21, 1913, as amended. 

8 (B) The Secretarial Order for the with9 drawal of land for the Frannie Townsite Res10 ervation dated April 19, 1920. 

Passed the Senate July 26, 2005. 

Attest: EMILY J. REYNOLDS, 

Secretary.
Listen

# Civil Rights Journal

The Civil Rights Journal is published by the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights as part of its clearinghouse responsibilities. Editorial inquiries and manuscript submissions should be directed to The Editor, Civil Rights Journal, U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 624 Ninth St., N.W., Washington, DC 20425.

Articles and other material contained in the Civil Rights Journal do not necessarily reflect USCCR policy, but are offered to stimulate thinking and discussion about various civil rights issues. No permission is required to quote or reprint contents with the exception of those that are copyrighted by authors or from other publications.

-  All Reports 
-  Annual Statutory Enforcement 
-  Briefing Reports 
-  Advisory Committees Reports 
-  Budget and Performance 
-  FOIA Reports 
-  Data Inventory Program 
-  Civil Rights Complaints 
-  Historical Publications 
-  Archives
Exhibit 32.1


               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


 In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Health Group Corp. (the
 "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with
 the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
 I, Edward L. Wristen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby
 certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
 Company.


 /s/ Edward L. Wristen

 Edward L. Wristen
 President and Chief Executive Officer
 May 10, 2004
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsNonlinear Modeling of Joint Dominated StructuresThe development and verification of an accurate structural model of the nonlinear joint-dominated NASA Langley Mini-Mast truss are described. The approach is to characterize the structural behavior of the Mini-Mast joints and struts using a test configuration that can directly measure the struts' overall stiffness and damping properties, incorporate this data into the structural model using the residual force technique, and then compare the predicted response with empirical data taken by NASA/LaRC during the modal survey tests of the Mini-Mast. A new testing technique, referred to as 'link' testing, was developed and used to test prototype struts of the Mini-Masts. Appreciable nonlinearities including the free-play and hysteresis were demonstrated. Since static and dynamic tests performed on the Mini-Mast also exhibited behavior consistent with joints having free-play and hysteresis, nonlinear models of the Mini-Mast were constructed and analyzed. The Residual Force Technique was used to analyze the nonlinear model of the Mini-Mast having joint free-play and hysteresis.Document ID19900020107Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsChapman, J. M.*(Boeing Aerospace Co. Seattle, WA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateSeptember 1, 1990Publication InformationPublisher: NASASubject CategorySpacecraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-4324NAS 1.26:4324Accession Number90N29423Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 585-01-91-01CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS1-18864Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900020107.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
DENY and Opinion Filed September 23, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-22-00931-CV

IN RE WALLY YAMMINE, Relator

Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-21-00009-C

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Molberg, Pedersen, III, and Garcia

Opinion by Justice Molberg

Before the Court is relator’s September 21, 2022 petition for writ of 

mandamus. In her petition, relator complains about the trial court’s failure to rule on 

her pending motion for default judgment. 

Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the trial court 

clearly abused its discretion and that she lacks an adequate remedy by appeal. In re 

Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding).

After reviewing the petition and the record before us, we conclude that relator has 

not demonstrated that the trial court clearly abused its discretion. 
–2–

Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P.

52.8(a). 

220931f.p05

/Ken Molberg//

KEN MOLBERG

JUSTICE
#### Crousore et al. *v.*Crawley, Administrator.

[No. 17,064.

Filed May 22, 1943.

Rehearing denied June 22, 1943.]

*T. Ernest Maholm,*of Indianapolis, for appellants.

*J ames & Allee*and *Gillen & Lyon,*all of Greencastle, for appellee.

Flanagan, P. J. —

Appellants’ brief wholly fails to comply with Rule 2-17 (f) of the Rules of the Supreme and Appellate Courts. No question is therefore presented for our consideration.

Judgment affirmed.

Note. — Reported in 48 N. E. (2d) 834,
#### § 1.90 Notice of sampling.

When a sample of an article offered for import has been requested by the division director, FDA shall provide to the owner or consignee prompt notice of delivery of, or intention to deliver, such sample. Upon receipt of the notice, the owner or consignee shall hold such article and not distribute it until further notice from the division director or U.S. Customs and Border Protection of the results of examination of the sample.

[85 FR 50781, Aug. 18, 2020]
Exhibit 22.1














INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM’S CONSENT








We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
Cicero Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-160581) of our report dated March 31,
2010with respect
to our audit of the consolidated financial statements of Cicero Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and for the year then ended, which report
is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cicero Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 2009.








/s/ Marcum LLP




Bala
Cynwyd, Pennsylvania


March 31,
2010
**M inntac** 

 Calculated limit starting with 2010 - 2012 CEM data o Deleted data where data substitution was used o Delete d data w/no flow rate o Average what data was left  Line 3 – 71.3 lb SO 2/hr (81 % of data used)  Line 4 – 56.1 lb SO 2/hr (85 % of data used)  Lin e 5 – 67 . 9 lb SO 2/hr (8 7 % of data used)  Line 6 – 64 . 5 lb SO 2/hr (8 7 % of data used)  Line 3 – 67.1 lb SO 2/hr (8 8 % of data used)
2007-2199.

#### State ex rel. Archie v. State.

Franklin App. No. 07AP-528, 2007-0hio-5408. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. It appears from the records of this court that appellant has not filed a merit brief, due January 28, 2008, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by the court that this cause is dismissed sua sponte.
§ 133.189 Skim milk cheese for manufacturing. ( a ) Skim milk cheese for manufacturing is the food prepared from skim milk and other ingredients specified in this section, by the procedure set forth in paragraph (b) of this section, or by another procedure which produces a finished cheese having the same physical and chemical properties as the cheese produced when the procedure set forth in paragraph (b) of this section is used. It contains not more than 50 percent of moisture, as determined by the method prescribed in § 133.5 (a). It is coated with blue-colored paraffin or other tightly adhering coating, colored blue.
( b ) Skim milk or the optional dairy ingredients specified in paragraph (c) of this section, which may be pasteurized, and which may be warmed, are subjected to the action of harmless lactic-acid-producing bacteria, present in such milk or added thereto. Harmless artificial coloring may be added. Sufficient rennet, or other safe and suitable milk-clotting enzyme that produces equivalent curd formation, or both, with or without purified calcium chloride in a quantity not more than 0.02 percent (calculated as anhydrous calcium chloride) of the weight of the skim milk, is added to set the skim milk to a semisolid mass. The mass is so cut, stirred, and heated with continued stirring, as to promote and regulate the separation of whey and curd. The whey is drained off, and the curd is matted into a cohesive mass. Proteins from the whey may be incorporated. The mass is cut into slabs which are so piled and handled as to promote the drainage of whey and the development of acidity. The slabs are then cut into pieces, which may be rinsed by pouring or sprinkling water over them, with free and continuous drainage; but the duration of such rinsing is so limited that only the whey on the surface of such pieces is removed. The curd is salted, stirred, further drained, and pressed into forms. A harmless preparation of enzymes of animal or plant origin capable of aiding in the curing or development of flavor of skim milk cheese for manufacturing may be added during the procedure, in such quantity that the weight of the solids of such preparation is not more than 0.1 percent of the weight of the milk used.
( c ) The optional dairy ingredients referred to in paragraph (b) of this section are: Skim milk or concentrated skim milk or nonfat dry milk or a mixture of any two or more of these, with water in a quantity not in excess of that sufficient to reconstitute any concentrated skim milk or nonfat dry milk used.
( d ) For the purposes of this section, “skim milk” means cow's milk from which the milk fat has been separated.
( e ) Each of the ingredients used in the food shall be declared on the label as required by the applicable sections of parts 101 and 130 of this chapter.
[42 FR 14366, Mar. 15, 1977, as amended at 49 FR 10096, Mar. 19, 1984; 58 FR 2895, Jan. 6, 1993]
----

Exhibit

| **Name**                                                   |   | **Jurisdiction**             |
|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------|
| Level                  8 Technologies, Inc.                |   | Delaware                     |
|                                                       |   |                         |
| Cicero                  Technologies, Inc,                 |   | Delaware                     |
|                                                       |   |                         |
| Cicero                  Technologies Acquisition, LLC      |   | Delaware                     |
|                                                       |   |                         |
| Template                  Software de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. |   | Mexico                       |
|                                                       |   |                         |
| Level                  8 Systems Australia Pty Ltd         |   | Australia                    |
|                                                       |   |                         |
| Template                  Software Holding GmbH            |   | Germany                      |
| Template                  SoftwareGeschaftsfuhrungs GmbH   |   | Germany                      |
| Template                  Software GmbH                    |   | Germany                      |
|                                                       |   |                         |
| Level                  8 Worldwide Holdings Ltd            |   | Delaware                     |
| Seer                  Technologies de Argentina S.A        |   | Argentina                    |
| Level                  8 FSC, Inc                          |   | Barbados                     |
| Level                  8 Benelux B.V                       |   | Netherlands                  |
| Seer                  Technologies do Brasil Ltd.          |   | Brazil                       |
| Level                  8 Canada, Inc                       |   | Canada                       |
| Level                  8 Europe (Deutschland) GmbH         |   | Germany                      |
| Level                  8 Ireland Limited                   |   | Ireland                      |
| Level                  8 Systems Nordic AB                 |   | Sweden                       |
| Seer                  Korea Co., Limited                   |   | South                  Korea |
| Seer                  Technologies Singapore PTY, Limited  |   | Singapore                    |
| Seer                  Technologies Hong Kong Limited       |   | Hong                  Kong   |
|                                                       |   |                         |
| 3020126                  Canada, Inc. (fka Bizware)        |   | Canada                       |

----
Exhibit 23

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors

MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the registration statement (Nos. 33-96420, 333-19159, 333-43474, 333-83624, 333-83628, 333-100404, and 333-122405) on Form S-8 of MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc. of our report dated February 26, 2007, with respect to the
consolidated balance sheets of MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005; and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2006; and our report dated February 26, 2007, with respect to managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, which reports appear in the December 31, 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K of MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc.

As discussed in note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123(R),
Share-Based Payment effective January 1, 2006. Also, as discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted SFAS No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other
Postretirement Plans effective December 31, 2006, and the Company changed its method of quantifying errors in 2006.



|                   
|-------------------
|/s/ KPMG LLP       
|                   
|St. Louis, Missouri
|February 26, 2007
<PAGE>   1


HEALTHCARE COMPARE CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES                           EXHIBIT 11.1
COMPUTATION OF PRIMARY EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
(UNAUDITED)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                   Three Months Ended March 31,
                                                   ----------------------------
                                                         1997        1996
                                                     -----------  -----------
  <S>                                                <C>          <C>

  Net income ......................................  $20,834,000  $18,950,000
                                                     ===========  ===========
  Weighted average number of common shares
   outstanding:
     Shares outstanding from beginning of period ..   33,697,000   34,635,000
     Other issuances of common stock ..............       31,000      258,000
     Purchases of treasury stock                        (202,000)     (73,000)
     Common Stock Equivalents:
     Additional equivalent shares issuable from
      assumed exercise of common stock options ....      631,000      825,000
                                                     -----------  -----------
  Weighted average common and common share
   equivalents ....................................   34,157,000   35,645,000
                                                     ===========  ===========
  Net income per common share .....................  $       .61  $       .53
                                                     ===========  ===========


</TABLE>
[No. 20167-4-II.

Division Two.

November 14, 1997.]

#### The State of Washington, *Appellant,*v. Derrick Saulsberry, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 93-1-01177-8, Arthur W. Verharen, J., entered December 15, 1995. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Seinfeld, J., concurred in by Houghton, C.J., and Morgan, J.
**EXHIBIT
        32.2**
  **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION 906
        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  
 In
        connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Southwall
        Technologies Inc. (the “Company”), for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, as
        filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
        “Report”), I, Sylvia Kamenski, the Vice President of Finance of the Company,
        hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1)
              the
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 
 2)
              the
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
 
 
 November
                  13, 2006
              By:
              /s/
                  Sylvia KamenskiSylvia Kamenski*Vice President of Finance*
 
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
        document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
        that
        appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
        required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be
        retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
        or its staff upon request.
 
 In
        accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K, this certification is being
“furnished” as Exhibit 32.2 to the Company's quarterly report and shall not
        be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act
        of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that
        section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under
        the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as expressly set forth
        by
        specific reference in such a filing.
Editorial Note on Part 184
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 184 appear at 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004; 70 FR 40880, July 15, 2005; 70 FR 67651, Nov. 8, 2005; and 81 FR 49897, July 29, 2016.

§ 184.1069 Malic acid. ( a ) Malic acid (C4H6O5, CAS Reg. No. of L-form 97-67-6, CAS Reg. No. of DL-form 617-48-1) is the common name for 1-hydroxy-1, 2-ethanedicarboxylic acid. L (+) malic acid, referred to as L-malic acid, occurs naturally in various foods. Racemic DL-malic acid does not occur naturally. It is made commercially by hydration of fumaric acid or maleic acid.
( b ) The ingredient meets the specifications of the “Food Chemicals Codex,” 3d Ed. (1981), pp. 183-184, which is incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the National Academy Press, 2101 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20418, or may be examined at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .*
( c ) The ingredients are used as a flavor enhancer as defined in § 170.3(o)(11) of this chapter, flavoring agent and adjuvant as defined in § 170.3(o)(12) of this chapter, and pH control agent as defined in § 170.3(o)(23) of this chapter.
( d ) The ingredients are used in food, except baby food, at levels not to exceed good manufacturing practice in accordance with § 184.1(b)(1). Current good manufacturing practice results in a maximum level, as served, of 3.4 percent for nonalcoholic beverages as defined in § 170.3(n)(3) of this chapter; 3.0 percent for chewing gum as defined in § 170.3(n)(6) of this chapter; 0.8 percent for gelatins, puddings, and fillings as defined in § 170.3(n)(22) of this chapter; 6.9 percent for hard candy as defined in § 170.3(n)(25) of this chapter; 2.6 percent for jams and jellies as defined in § 170.3(n)(28) of this chapter; 3.5 percent for processed fruits and fruit juices as defined in § 170.3(n)(35) of this chapter; 3.0 percent for soft candy as defined in § 170.3(n)(38) of this chapter; and 0.7 percent for all other food categories.
( e ) Prior sanctions for malic acid different from the uses established in this section do not exist or have been waived.
[44 FR 20656, Apr. 6, 1979, as amended at 49 FR 5611, Feb. 14, 1984]