alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OPEN-FILE REPORT

94- . y"
113° 1U.S. GEOLQGICAL SURVEY o 12'30", ROW) RBW 9 9475449 sige 113°07130"
36°45" - — > y s 1? , T 36° 45)
= Na WB. t ae g |
| 2 ; 2 | be’ ))/ O93 Qs 46, | 69
. VW) a 26 | yl; |
3 % ( ot? ¢ NS Q Q 7 “se
406000 Rf } ° < y }
Nj Qo 4 ae i if {fe ’ ys - Qq,. f ch y " ° ae. ii Yael
) 4 \ Ks Yi = ; X
\ $7 [ < - f q }
< a of MELZai29 Qg 1 | 2.090000
J - os EES Z n y | B\ [FEET
5200-4? —Woigmaster /) y ary \ i : | es
: ( Lae y WY ONG / i? . |
« ) . OZ as” } \prn X -e
= 2 \ \ | >
2 \
8 Y | \
Z

T.39N.

IT 39N.

T. 38N. T. 38N

\ | 966

42'30" fa2'30"

yee: fy y | v \ A d 5 | F7\ ya Mn\/AA ONY
! y . J y N Q SPah > -
; fp e ISD he ‘ / y, i: i OY
wh 4, A ND vy Ky “yo Lo s270 , 5 Z a eat ye = 5 f Ns ip PAANEN: AIT. 38h
al ei, , y raw \ MG iA } 4 Ee S \ eQ a e Tr. 37
MEA } ( ° N } shoe | = Wh gy MPTOA Aw

. 4056 000m

Za
sorte
36° 37'30”" vhs !

113° BM se°trom U8.
Antelope Knoll, Arizona 1971

* - 2 a
Se ‘a0 400 0007000
He 2 2 a
sce aa =
CONTOUR INTERVAL 20 FEET .
DOTTED LINES REPRESENT 10-FOOT CONTOURS
DATUM IS MEAN SEA LEVEL \RIZO}

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE ANTELOPE KNOLL QUADRANGLE, NORTHERN MOHAVE COUNTY, ARIZONA
By
George H. Billingsley

This map is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological
Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade,

1994 product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by
the U.S, Government.
H. Res. 175 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

March 8, 2017. 

Resolved, That at any time after adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, 

declare the House resolved into the Committee of the Whole 

House on the state of the Union for consideration of the bill 

(H.R. 725) to amend title 28, United States Code, to prevent 

fraudulent joinder. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the 

bill are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill 

and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled 

by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee 

on the Judiciary. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. The bill shall 

be considered as read. All points of order against provisions 

in the bill are waived. No amendment to the bill shall be in 

order except those printed in the report of the Committee on 

Rules accompanying this resolution. Each such amendment 

may be offered only in the order printed in the report, may 

be offered only by a Member designated in the report, shall 
2 

•HRES 175 EH 

be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, 

and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question in the House or in the Committee of the Whole. All 

points of order against such amendments are waived. At the 

conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the 

Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with 

such amendments as may have been adopted. The previous 

question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and 

amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7158 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

201 East Battles Road in Santa Maria, California, as the ‘‘Larry 

Lavagnino Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 31, 2024 

Mr. CARBAJAL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 201 East Battles Road in Santa Maria, California, as the ‘‘Larry Lavagnino Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LARRY LAVAGNINO POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 201 East Battles Road in Santa 

6 Maria, California, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘Larry Lavagnino Post Office Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7158 IH

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Larry Lavagnino Post 

3 Office Building’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
================================================================================


EXHIBIT 32

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CirTran Corporation on Form 10-QSB
for the period ending September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Iehab Hawatmeh, President
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                                           /s/ Iehab J. Hawatmeh
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Iehab J. Hawatmeh
                                           President and Chief Financial Officer


















--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Gordon L. Ellis, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1.

To my knowledge, this report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

To my knowledge, the information in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of International Absorbents Inc.





|                    |                                                                         
|------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: June 11, 2009 | /s/ GORDON L. ELLIS
Gordon L. EllisPresident and Chief Executive Officer
# L_2018217EN.01000601.xml

| 27.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 217/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 217/6

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2018/1202

of 22 August 2018

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications ‘Czosnek galicyjski’ (PGI)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Poland's application to register the name ‘Czosnek galicyjski’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Poland's application to register the name ‘Czosnek galicyjski’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Czosnek galicyjski’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Czosnek galicyjski’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Czosnek galicyjski’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.6. – Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 August 2018.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Pierre MOSCOVICI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 110, 23.3.2018, p. 32.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
#### § 1401.4 Access to information.

The Office of National Drug Control Policy makes available information pertaining to matters issued, adopted, or promulgated by ONDCP, that are within the scope of 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(2). Such information is located at *https://www.whitehouse.gov/ondcp.* Included in that information are ONDCP's proactive disclosures. Proactive disclosures are records that have been requested three or more times, or that have been released to a requester and that ONDCP determines have become, or are likely to become, the subject of subsequent requests for substantially the same records.
#### § 2339.500 Who in the Social Security Administration determines that a recipient other than an individual violated the requirements of this part?

The Commissioner of Social Security or designee will make the determination.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-12-00438-CR

David Cepeda Jones, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY, 226TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 1994-CR-5367W, THE HONORABLE SID L. HARLE, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant David Cepeda Jones, acting pro se, filed a notice of appeal seeking to

appeal an opinion issued by the Fourth Court of Appeals. He complains about the Fourth Court’s

dismissal of his petition for writ of mandamus.

This Court’s appellate jurisdiction generally is limited to cases appealed from trial

courts in our court of appeals district, which does not include Bexar County. Tex. Gov’t Code Ann.

§ 22.201 (West Supp. 2010). We see no basis for jurisdiction over an appeal of matters arising out

of actions taken by the Fourth Court of Appeals, and nothing in the documents appellant has filed

demonstrates we otherwise have authority to grant any relief he seeks. See Olivo v. State,

918 S.W.2d 519, 522-23 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) (listing Government Code § 22.201 among

examples of laws that establish jurisdiction of courts of appeals).
To any extent that appellant’s pleadings could be read as initiating an original

appellate proceeding seeking extraordinary relief, see Tex. R. App. P. 52, we note that our

mandamus authority also is limited. By statute, this Court has the authority to issue a writ of

mandamus against “a judge of a district or county court in the court of appeals district” and other

writs as necessary to enforce our appellate jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West

Supp. 2010). The Fourth Court of Appeals is not a party against whom we may issue a writ of

mandamus. Nor has appellant demonstrated that the exercise of our writ power is necessary to

enforce our jurisdiction as we have no appellate jurisdiction over the Fourth Court of Appeals.

Finding we lack jurisdiction, we dismiss his attempted appeal.

__________________________________________

Melissa Goodwin, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Rose and Goodwin

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: July 11, 2012

Do Not Publish

2
§ 1317.35 Collection by law enforcement. ( a ) Federal, State, tribal, or local law enforcement may collect controlled substances from ultimate users and persons lawfully entitled to dispose of an ultimate user decedent's property using the following collection methods: ( 1 ) Take-back events in accordance with § 1317.65;
( 2 ) Mail-back programs in accordance with § 1317.70; or
( 3 ) Collection receptacles located inside law enforcement's physical address.
( b ) Law enforcement that conducts a take-back event or a mail-back program or maintains a collection receptacle should maintain any records of removal, storage, or destruction of the controlled substances collected in a manner that is consistent with that agency's recordkeeping requirements for illicit controlled substances evidence.
( c ) Any controlled substances collected by law enforcement through a take-back event, mail-back program, or collection receptacle should be stored in a manner that prevents the diversion of controlled substances and is consistent with that agency's standard procedures for storing illicit controlled substances.
( d ) Any controlled substances collected by law enforcement through a take-back event, mail-back program, or collection receptacle should be transferred to a destruction location in a manner that prevents the diversion of controlled substances and is consistent with that agency's standard procedures for transferring illicit controlled substances.
( e ) Law enforcement that transfers controlled substances collected from ultimate users pursuant to this part to a reverse distributor for destruction should maintain a record that contains the following information: If a sealed inner liner as described in § 1317.60 is used, the unique identification number of the sealed inner liner transferred, and the size of the sealed inner liner transferred (e.g., 5-gallon, 10-gallon, etc.); if a mail-back package as described in § 1317.70 is used, the unique identification number of each package; the date of the transfer; and the name, address, and registration number of the reverse distributor to whom the controlled substances were transferred.
EXHIBIT 23.2
   Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

   We consent  to the  incorporation by  reference in  the  Registration
   Statements of Spyglass, Inc. on Form  S-3 (File Nos. 333-06943,  333-
   08255, 333-08253 and 333-14643) and on Form S-8 (File Nos.  33-95164,
   33-95160, 33-95162, 33-95158,  333-2312 and  333-04357) of  Spyglass,
   Inc. of  our reports  dated October  25, 1996,  with respect  to  the
   consolidated financial  statements  and schedule  of  Spyglass,  Inc.
   included and incorporated by reference in the Annual Report (Form 10-
   K) for the year ended September 30, 1998.

   /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

   PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
   Chicago, Illinois
   December 17, 1998
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with this Amendment No. 3 to the annual report of MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Ahmad R. Chatila, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Brian Wuebbels, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|   |                                                                                                                      
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:June 21, 2012By:/s/ Ahmad R. ChatilaName:Title:Ahmad R. ChatilaPresident and Chief Executive OfficerMEMC Electronic Materials, Inc.Date:June 21, 2012By:/s/ Brian WuebbelsName:Title:Brian WuebbelsExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerMEMC Electronic Materials, Inc.
# m8840.docx

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 28.3.2018 C(2018) 2081 final To the notifying parties Subject : Case M. 8 8 40 - APOLLO / JSW / MONNET Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 1 and Article 57 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area 2 Dear Sir or Madam, 1. On 2 March 2018 , the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which AION Investments Private II Limited, controlled by investment funds managed by affiliates of Apollo Capital Management, L.P.('Apollo') (USA) , and JSW Steel Limited ('JSW') (India) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the whole of Monnet Ispat and Energy Limited ('Monnet') (India) . 3 2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are: – for Apollo : Affiliates of Apollo invest in companies and debt issued by companies in various businesses throughout the world. Examples of current investments include, inter alia, companies in the chemical, cruise line, hospital, security, financial services and glass packaging businesses. – for JSW: JSW is an Indian-based company engaged in the manufacture and sale of iron and steel products in India and abroad. In India, JSW’s plants are located across Karnataka, Tamil Nadu and Maharashtra. Outside of India, JSW owns a plate and pipe mill in the United States, and mining assets in the United States and elsewhere. – for Monnet : Monnet is an Indian-based company engaged in the manufacture and sale of primary steel a nd sponge iron, steel and ferro alloys. Monnet is also active in the mining of minerals like coal and iron ore in India. 3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5 ( a ) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 . 4 4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation and Article 57 of the EEA Agreement . For the Commission (Signed)
Johannes LAITENBERGER Director - General
(1)
OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ( the ' Merger Regulation ' ). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( ' TFEU ' ) has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of ' Community ' by ' Union ' and ' common market ' by ' internal market ' . The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.
(2) OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3 ( the ' EEA Agreement ' ).
(3) Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 96 , 14 .3 .2018 , p. 3 3
(4)
OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5 .
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 13

- 00436

- CV

Carroll Craig Bolin and Mary

Kathalina Bolin

v.

First State Bank §

§

§

§ From the 271st Distric t Court

o f Wise County (CV13

- 05

- 429 )

March 13, 2014

P er C uriam



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

the appeal should be dismissed. It is order ed that the appeal is dismissed for

want of jurisdiction.

S ECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
# EUR-Lex - 31994R0535 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31994R0535

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 535/94 of 9 March 1994 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the common customs tariff **

*
Official Journal L 068 , 11/03/1994 P. 0015 - 0015 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 535/94 of 9 March 1994 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (1), as last amended by Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3080/93 (2), and in particular Article 9 thereof,

Whereas, to ensure uniform application of the Combined Nomenclature, provisions should be laid down for the classification of salted meat and edible meat offal falling within CN code heading 0210, in order to distinguish them from fresh, chilled or frozen meat and edible meat offal; whereas a total salt content of 1,2 % or more by weight appears an appropriate criterion for distinguishing between these two types of products;

Whereas an additional note to this effect should be inserted in Chapter 2 of the Combined Nomenclature; whereas Annex I to Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 should therefore be amended;

Whereas the provisions of this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Customs Code Committee - Tariff and Statistical Nomenclature Section,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The following additional note shall be inserted in Chapter 2 of the Combined Nomenclature annexed to Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87:

'8. For the purposers of heading No 0210, the term 'salted' means meat or edible meat offal which has been deeply and homogeneously impregnated with salt in all parts, having a total salt content not less than 1,2% by weight.'

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twenty-first day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 March 1994.

For the Commission

Christiane SCRIVENER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 256, 7. 9. 1987, p. 1.

(2) OJ No L 277, 10. 11. 1993, p. 1.
Editorial Note on Part 110
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 110 appear at 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 110.5 Current good manufacturing practice. ( a ) The criteria and definitions in this part shall apply in determining whether a food is adulterated ( 1 ) within the meaning of section 402(a)(3) of the act in that the food has been manufactured under such conditions that it is unfit for food; or
( 2 ) within the meaning of section 402(a)(4) of the act in that the food has been prepared, packed, or held under insanitary conditions whereby it may have become contaminated with filth, or whereby it may have been rendered injurious to health. The criteria and definitions in this part also apply in determining whether a food is in violation of section 361 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 264).
( b ) Food covered by specific current good manufacturing practice regulations also is subject to the requirements of those regulations.