alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Draft Proposal CB-9

This concept has been developed by the DOE Building Energy Codes Program (BECP) as a possible code

change proposal to the Commercial provisions of the 2012 International Energy Conservation Code

(IECC). Interested parties are asked to submit any and all comments on DOE's initial concepts and draft

code change proposals. For instructions on submitting comments, visit:

www.energycodes.gov/development/ commercial/codes/iecc/concepts/



## Roof Solar Reflectance and Thermal Emittance (CB-9)

Objective: Simplify criteria for low sloped roofs by adding a definition for the term “low slope roof.”

Suggested Code Change Proposal

Revise Section C402.2.1.1 and add a new definition to Section C202 as follows:

C402.2.1.1 Roof solar reflectance and thermal emittance. Low sloped roofs, with a slope less than 2

units vertical in 12 units horizontal, directly above cooled conditioned spaces in Climate Zones 1, 2, and 3

shall comply with one or more of the options in Table C402.2.1.1.

(Exceptions remain unchanged.)

C202. LOW SLOPED ROOF. A roof having a slope less than 2 units vertical in 12 units horizontal.

Reason: The current code text includes within it a definition that might be better placed in the

definitions section of the code. Alternatively, if this is the only place the term is used, the need for a

definition is moot if the text is then revised as “Roofs with a slope less than 2 units vertical in 12 units

horizontal directly above....”

Cost Impact: There is no cost impact associated with this proposed change.
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Bigfoot Project Investments Inc.  (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended July 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Tom Biscardi, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: December 9, 2016  /s/ Tom Biscardi Tom Biscardi Principal Executive Officer
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear at 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 117.95 Holding and distribution of human food by-products for use as animal food. ( a ) Human food by-products held for distribution as animal food without additional manufacturing or processing by the human food processor, as identified in § 507.12 of this chapter, must be held under conditions that will protect against contamination, including the following: ( 1 ) Containers and equipment used to convey or hold human food by-products for use as animal food before distribution must be designed, constructed of appropriate material, cleaned as necessary, and maintained to protect against the contamination of human food by-products for use as animal food;
( 2 ) Human food by-products for use as animal food held for distribution must be held in a way to protect against contamination from sources such as trash; and
( 3 ) During holding, human food by-products for use as animal food must be accurately identified.
( b ) Labeling that identifies the by-product by the common or usual name must be affixed to or accompany human food by-products for use as animal food when distributed.
( c ) Shipping containers (*e.g.,* totes, drums, and tubs) and bulk vehicles used to distribute human food by-products for use as animal food must be examined prior to use to protect against contamination of the human food by-products for use as animal food from the container or vehicle when the facility is responsible for transporting the human food by-products for use as animal food itself or arranges with a third party to transport the human food by-products for use as animal food.
[80 FR 56337, Sept. 17, 2015]
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.19A


                                                                   BANK HAPOALIM

                                                               New York Branches
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                  March 27, 2001


Ms. Renee Fulk
Chief Financial Officer
Level 8 Systems, Inc.
8000 Regency Parkway
Cary, North Carolina 27511


Re:  $15,000,000 Line of Credit from Bank Hapoalim B.M. (the "Bank")
     ---------------------------------------------------------------
     To Level 8 Systems, Inc. (the "Company").
     -----------------------------------------


Dear Ms. Fulk:

     This will confirm that an application for extension of the maturity date
for the above referenced loan is being processed by the Bank.  We will extend
the loan to January 30, 2002 and anticipate delivering amended documents to the
Company for execution shortly.

                                       Very truly yours,


                                       Bank Hapoalim B.M.


                                       By: /s/ Maxine Levy
                                           ----------------------------
                                       Title: Vice President
                                              -------------------------
                                       Name:  Maxine Levy
                                              -------------------------


                                       By: /s/ Donald Tashner
                                           ----------------------------
                                       Title: Senior Vice President
                                              -------------------------
                                       Name:  Donald Tashner
                                              -------------------------
Collaboration Agreement dated July 31, 2006



 Exhibit 10.29 
 COLLABORATION AGREEMENT 
 Party A: Shanghai Pudong Development Bank Suzhou Branch

 Party B: Multi-Fineline Electronix (Suzhou) Co., Ltd 
 In
view to further strengthen the close relationship between Party A (hereinafter called A) and Party B (hereinafter called B) and on the base of the principles of equality and mutual benefit, both parties, through friendly negotiation, have agreed to
enter into the following agreement under the terms specified as followed: 
 I With the total amount of USD 10 million credit line, A facilitate with B
with varied corporate financing types, including short-time loan, issuing of L/C, banking acceptance bills, etc. 
 If the loan currency is RMB, the
loan’s interest rate is 10% downward the benchmark stipulated by the People’s Bank of China; 
 If the loan
currency is foreign exchange, the loan’s interest rate is LIBOR (fluctuating everyday) plus 75 base points. 
 II With the minimum deposit amount of USD
3 million, the interest will be calculated with the interest rate of LIBOR minus 15 base points. 
 III L/C issuance
will be charged on the basis of 0.72‰ per L/C. 









 IV T/T remittance will be charged as follows: maximum, RMB 500 yuan; minimum, RMB 50 yuan, below RMB 50 or above RMB 500
the fee will be charged on the basis of 0.45‰. 
 V Currencies exchange rate is as follows: if exchange amount is above 0.2 million US dollars,
foreign currency exchanging into RMB can be adjusted upward 100 base points on the basis of purchase price; if below 0.2 million, upward 85 base points. 
 VI L/C negotiation will be charged on the basis of 0.9‰. 
 VII B will open RMB and USD settlement account in A, and B should look upon A as the main collaboration bank. 
 VIII After the contract takes into effect, both parties will negotiate and replenish the contract as soon as the contract has any conflict with the Laws regulations and
rules of China. 
 IX The duration for this contract is from 31 July, 2006 to 31 July, 2007. 
 X With two originals to A and B respectively, this agreement will be taken into effect with the stamps of both parties. 
  

									
	 Party A:
	 	 /s/ Yan Qi
	 		 	 Party B:
	 	 /s/ Philip A. Harding

					
	 	 	 	 	 	 		 	 
		 		 		 	 Date: 31 July, 2006
#### § 5800.437 What method do I use to communicate to a participant the requirements described in the OMB guidance at 2 CFR 180.435?

To communicate to a participant the requirements described in 2 CFR 180.435 of the OMB guidance, you as an agency official must include a term or condition in the transaction that requires the participant's compliance with subpart C of 2 CFR part 180, and requires the participant to include a similar term or condition in lower-tier covered transactions.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-3307-EM; Docket ID FEMA-2010-0002]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for the State of Arizona (FEMA-3307-DR), dated January 24, 2010, and related determinations.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         January 29, 2010.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the incident period for this emergency is closed effective January 29, 2010.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2010-3438 Filed 2-22-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
#### PEOPLE, Appellant, v. CUSICK, et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

May 29, 1914.)

Proceeding by the People of the State of New York against John J. Cusick and another.

PER CURIAM.

As it did not appear before the County Court that the people would lose no rights in this proceeding by the vacation of the forfeiture of the bond, we think the order was improvidently granted. It is true that a new criminal proceeding may be instituted against Dardin, but there is nothing to show that he is now within the jurisdiction of the courts of this state, and that a new warrant after issuance can be executed without unnecessary trouble to the district attorney. The order of the County Court of Kings County is therefore reversed, without prejudice to a renewal of the application for the remission of the forfeiture, on proofs showing that the people would not be hampered thereby.
Exhibit 4.1


     

    Number
      Shares

     BOASHINN
      CORPORATION     

    INCORPORATED
      UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

    


    COMMON
      VOTING STOCK                          
      Cusip                             COMMON
      VOTING
      STOCK 

                                                PAR
      VALUE:
      $0.001                           
FULLY
      PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE

     

    THIS
      CERTIFIES THAT  SPECIMEN
      CERTIFICATE

     

    


    IS
      THE REGISTERED HOLDER OF 

    SHARES
      OF THE COMMON STOCK OF BOASHINN CORPORATION,
      a Nevada
      Corporation, transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder
      hereof in person or by Attorney upon surrender of the Certificate properly
      endorsed. Witness
      the
      facsimile Seal of the Corporation and the facsimile Signatures of its duly
      authorized officers. 

    


     Not
      Valid
      Unless

    Initialed
      by Transfer Agent

    By:
       Authorized
      Initial 

    


    


    MADISON
      STOCK TRANSFER INC.

    PO
      BOX
      145

    BROOKLYN,
      NY 11229

    


    Ricky
      Chiu               Boashinn
      Corporation                 Ricky
      Chiu

    President
      & CEO                             Corporate
      Seal                                 Secretary

    NEVADA
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-40985

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JUAN CARLOS ROBINSON-JESUS,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:13-CR-603-1

Before KING, HAYNES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Juan Carlos Robinson-Jesus appeals his 41-month sentence for illegal 

presence in the United States following deportation. He challenges the 16-

level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) imposed for his prior 

conviction for statutory rape under Tennessee Code Annotated § 39-13-506(b). 

According to Robinson-Jesus, the district court erred by applying the 

enhancement because § 39-13-506 criminalizes sexual intercourse with 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 17, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-40985 Document: 00512665965 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/17/2014
No. 13-40985

someone under the age of 18 whereas the generic, contemporary definition of 

“statutory rape”--as it is defined by the Model Penal Code and the laws of 

various states--prohibits intercourse with someone under the age of 16. The 

Government has filed an unopposed motion for summary affirmance.

In United States v. Rodriguez, 711 F.3d 541, 544 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. 

denied, 134 S. Ct. 512 (2013), we held that a “plain-meaning approach” applies 

to the determination of the “generic, contemporary” meaning of statutory rape 

under § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii). Under this approach, the court looks to the age of 

consent as it is “defined by statute in the jurisdiction where the prior conviction 

was obtained” instead of conducting the “cumbersome” survey of state codes, 

the Model Penal Code, federal law, and treatises that Robinson-Jesus urges. 

See id. 

Robinson-Jesus concedes that the issue is foreclosed by Rodriguez and 

raises it merely to preserve it for further review. Accordingly, the 

Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the 

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The Government’s alternative 

motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED.

2

 Case: 13-40985 Document: 00512665965 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/17/2014
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-6136

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KELVIN JEROME NEWKIRK,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Wilmington. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (7:15-cr-00019-H-1; 7:16-cv00345-H)

Submitted: April 25, 2019 Decided: April 30, 2019

Before FLOYD and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kelvin Jerome Newkirk, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Kelvin Jerome Newkirk seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on 

his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A 

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable 

jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on 

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a 

constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Newkirk has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# EUR-Lex - 31991R1497 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31991R1497

**Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1497/91 of 3 June 1991 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2191/81 on the granting of aid for the purchase of butter by non-profit-making institutions and organizations **

*
Official Journal L 140 , 04/06/1991 P. 0019 - 0019 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 37 P. 0207 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 37 P. 0207 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EEC) No 1497/91 of 3 June 1991 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2191/81 on the granting of aid for the purchase of butter by non-profit-making institutions and organizations

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 804/68 of 27 June 1968 on the common organization of the market in milk and milk products (1), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 3641/90 (2), and in particular Article 12 (3) thereof,

Whereas Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2191/81 (3), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1679/89 (4), provides for the granting of aid for the purchase of butter by non-profit-making institutions and organizations; whereas the aid is to be granted to the supplier of the butter at his written request and on submission of a voucher bearing a serial number issued for a period not exceeding six months; whereas that period should be extended in order to lighten the administrative burden on the national authorities;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: Article 1

In Article 3 (6) of Regulation (EEC) No 2191/81, the words 'six months' are hereby replaced by '12 months'. Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities. This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 3 June 1991. For the Commission

Ray MAC SHARRY

Member of the Commission (1) OJ No L 148, 28. 6. 1968, p. 13. (2) OJ No L 362, 27. 12. 1990, p. 5. (3) OJ No L 213, 1. 8. 1981, p. 20. (4) OJ No L 164, 15. 6. 1989, p. 14.
§ 830.2 Exclusions. This part does not apply to: ( a ) Activities that are regulated through a license by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) or a State under an Agreement with the NRC, including activities certified by the NRC under section 1701 of the Atomic Energy Act (Act);
( b ) Activities conducted under the authority of the Director, Naval Nuclear Propulsion, pursuant to Executive Order 12344, as set forth in Public Law 106- 65;
( c ) Transportation activities which are regulated by the Department of Transportation;
( d ) Activities conducted under the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, as amended, and any facility identified under section 202(5) of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, as amended; and
( e ) Activities related to the launch approval and actual launch of nuclear energy systems into space.
EXHIBIT
32.1









CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(Subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code)







Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of National Datacomputer, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





Except as
set forth in the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended
September 30, 2008 (the “Form 10-Q/A”),  the Form 10-Q/A fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.








Dated:
March 9,
2009                                                                                           /s/  WilliamBerens


William
B. Berens


President
and Chief Executive Officer







Dated:
March 9,
2009                                                                                           /s/ Bruna
Bucacci


Bruna
Bucacci


Chief
Accounting Officer







A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 1250.30 Construction, maintenance and use of places where food is prepared, served, or stored. ( a ) All kitchens, galleys, pantries, and other places where food is prepared, served, or stored shall be adequately lighted and ventilated: *Provided, however,* That ventilation of cold storage rooms shall not be required. All such places where food is prepared, served, or stored shall be so constructed and maintained as to be clean and free from flies, rodents, and other vermin.
( b ) Such places shall not be used for sleeping or living quarters.
( c ) Water of satisfactory sanitary quality, under head or pressure, and adequate in amount and temperature, shall be easily accessible to all rooms in which food is prepared and utensils are cleaned.
( d ) All plumbing shall be so designed, installed, and maintained as to prevent contamination of the water supply, food, and food utensils.