U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office

Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800

Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001

92–743PDF 2004

SAFETY AND SECURITY OF PEACE CORPS

VOLUNTEERS

HEARING

BEFORE THE

COMMITTEE ON 

INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

ONE HUNDRED EIGHTH CONGRESS

SECOND SESSION

MARCH 24, 2004

Serial No. 108–102

Printed for the use of the Committee on International Relations

(

Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.house.gov/international—relations 

(II)

COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 

HENRY J. HYDE, Illinois, Chairman 

JAMES A. LEACH, Iowa 

DOUG BEREUTER, Nebraska 

CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey, 

Vice Chairman 

DAN BURTON, Indiana 

ELTON GALLEGLY, California 

ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN, Florida 

CASS BALLENGER, North Carolina 

DANA ROHRABACHER, California 

EDWARD R. ROYCE, California 

PETER T. KING, New York 

STEVE CHABOT, Ohio 

AMO HOUGHTON, New York 

JOHN M. MCHUGH, New York 

ROY BLUNT, Missouri 

THOMAS G. TANCREDO, Colorado 

RON PAUL, Texas 

NICK SMITH, Michigan 

JOSEPH R. PITTS, Pennsylvania 

JEFF FLAKE, Arizona 

JO ANN DAVIS, Virginia 

MARK GREEN, Wisconsin 

JERRY WELLER, Illinois 

MIKE PENCE, Indiana 

THADDEUS G. MCCOTTER, Michigan 

KATHERINE HARRIS, Florida 

TOM LANTOS, California 

HOWARD L. BERMAN, California 

GARY L. ACKERMAN, New York 

ENI F.H. FALEOMAVAEGA, American 

Samoa 

DONALD M. PAYNE, New Jersey 

ROBERT MENENDEZ, New Jersey 

SHERROD BROWN, Ohio 

BRAD SHERMAN, California 

ROBERT WEXLER, Florida 

ELIOT L. ENGEL, New York 

WILLIAM D. DELAHUNT, Massachusetts 

GREGORY W. MEEKS, New York 

BARBARA LEE, California 

JOSEPH CROWLEY, New York 

JOSEPH M. HOEFFEL, Pennsylvania 

EARL BLUMENAUER, Oregon 

SHELLEY BERKLEY, Nevada 

GRACE F. NAPOLITANO, California 

ADAM B. SCHIFF, California 

DIANE E. WATSON, California 

ADAM SMITH, Washington 

BETTY MCCOLLUM, Minnesota 

CHRIS BELL, Texas 

THOMAS E. MOONEY, SR., Staff Director/General Counsel 

ROBERT R. KING, Democratic Staff Director 

PETER D.R. SMITH, Professional Staff Member 

LIBERTY DUNN, Staff Associate 

(III)

C O N T E N T S 

Page

WITNESSES 

The Honorable Gaddi H. Vasquez, Director, The Peace Corps ............................ 10

Walter R. Poirier ...................................................................................................... 20

Jeffrey Bruce, Editor, Dayton Daily News ............................................................. 31

Jess Ford, Director, International Affairs and Trade, U.S. General Accounting 

Office ..................................................................................................................... 35

Kevin F.F. Quigley, President, National Peace Corps Association ...................... 43

The Honorable Charles D. Smith, Inspector General, The Peace Corps ............. 49

LETTERS, STATEMENTS, ETC., SUBMITTED FOR THE HEARING 

The Honorable Tom Lantos, a Representative in Congress from the State 

of California: Material submitted for the record ............................................... 6

The Honorable Gaddi H. Vasquez: Prepared statement ...................................... 12

Walter R. Poirier: GAO Report 01–970R, dated July 20, 2001, submitted 

for the record ........................................................................................................ 23

Prepared statement .............................................................................................. 29

Jeffrey Bruce: Prepared statement ........................................................................ 33

Jess Ford: Prepared statement ............................................................................... 37

Kevin F.F. Quigley: Prepared statement ............................................................... 45

The Honorable Charles D. Smith: Prepared statement ........................................ 51

APPENDIX 

The Honorable Tom Lantos: Prepared statement on H.R. 4060, the Health 

Safety, and Security of Peace Corps Volunteer Act of 2004 ............................. 63

The Honorable Nick Smith, a Representative in Congress from the State 

of Michigan: Prepared statement ........................................................................ 64

The Honorable Earl Blumenauer, a Representative in Congress from the 

State of Oregon: Prepared statement ................................................................. 64

The Honorable Gaddi H. Vasquez: Responses to questions submitted for the 

record by the Committee on International Relations and additional materials submitted for the record ............................................................................. 65

(1)

SAFETY AND SECURITY OF PEACE CORPS 

VOLUNTEERS 

WEDNESDAY, MARCH 24, 2004

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, 

COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, 

Washington, DC. 

The Committee met, pursuant to call, at 10:36 a.m. in Room 

2172, Rayburn House Office Building, Hon. Henry J. Hyde (Chairman of the Committee) presiding. 

Chairman HYDE. The Committee will come to order. Good morning, and welcome to this morning’s hearing of the Committee on 

International Relations. 

The purpose of today’s hearing is to examine the safety and security practices of the Peace Corps. The Members of this Committee 

drafted a Peace Corps bill last year that authorizes the doubling 

of the Peace Corps. That measure was included in H.R. 1950, 

which passed the House by a vote of 382 to 42 in July 2003. Next 

week, the Committee will consider additional legislation intended 

to improve the security and safety of our Peace Corps Volunteers. 

Today, we are going to hear from a distinguished group of witnesses each with firsthand experience in matters of safety and security of Peace Corps Volunteers. 

We come here as supporters of the Peace Corps, admirers of their 

sacrifice and of the important work they do. It is for that reason 

that today we wish to inquire into the adequacy of safety and security practices that will govern their assignment in dangerous places 

around the world. 

Instead of a lengthy opening statement, I would like to read for 

you brief excerpts from three important documents on this topic 

which we will explore and refer to throughout today’s hearing. 

The first excerpt is from a GAO, General Accounting Office, report on Peace Corps safety and security dated July 2002:

‘‘The Peace Corps is embarking on a major expansion of its 

volunteer work force during a time of heightened risk for 

Americans living abroad. Providing safety and security for its 

volunteers is the Peace Corps’ higher priority. Our review of 

the agency’s efforts to ensure compliance with its basic safety 

and security policies and guidelines show that there are cases 

of uneven implementation of key elements of the safety and security framework that could pose risks to volunteers. These include uneven performance in developing safe and secure housing and worksites, responding to volunteer concerns and planning for emergencies.’’

2

The second excerpt is from a recent investigative series by the 

Dayton Daily News dated October 27, 2003:

‘‘Every minute of every day for more than 21⁄2 years now 

Walter and Sheila Poirier have lived with a grim reality. They 

may never know what happened to their son. 

‘‘ ‘Our concentration is still on finding Walter,’ Sheila said. 

‘He is probably not alive, but he may be.’

‘‘Long ago, their grief turned to anger, and their anger is directed squarely at the Peace Corps. They believe the agency 

should have been watching more closely, and they are not 

alone. 

‘‘ ‘We believe that the Peace Corps severely failed their people, their volunteers, and knowing what I know there is no 

way I would let my children volunteer for the Peace Corps unless there was some immediate changes and serious changes in 

the Peace Corps,’ said the General Accounting Office’s Patrick 

Sullivan, who spent 23 years as a U.S. Secret Service agent. 

‘There is no way I would put my children or recommend to 

anybody I know to put their loved ones in that situation.’

‘‘Sullivan and John Cooney went to Bolivia on behalf of the 

GAO’s Office of Special Investigations to review the Peace 

Corps’ handling of the case.’’

The third excerpt is from the GAO report referenced in the previous excerpt dated July 20, 2001. It reads as follows:

‘‘Both the Country Director and Deputy Country Director for 

the Peace Corps in Bolivia told us, the GAO, that the Associate 

Director was not keeping close enough contact with Mr. 

Poirier.’’

The report also states:

‘‘The Associate Director also said that he became so busy supervising the other volunteers that Mr. Poirier ‘dropped of my 

radar screen.’ He said he made no further attempt to contact 

Mr. Poirier.’’

The GAO report is summarized in the following statement, and 

I quote:

‘‘The Peace Corps failed to properly supervise Mr. Poirier 

and lost track of him.’’

The purpose of today’s hearing is to understand the Peace 

Corps’s efforts to develop and ensure compliance with basic safety 

and security policies for Peace Corps Volunteers. Today’s hearing 

will provide Members with necessary background information on 

the problems that have existed in recent years and as a case study 

will examine the specific problems and management failures that 

led to and followed the disappearance of a volunteer in Bolivia, 

Walter J. Poirier. 

The hearing will provide Members with an opportunity to understand the policy and organizational changes made within the Peace 

Corps over the past 2 years toward the goal of improving safety 

and security of volunteers. 

This hearing will also provide Members with the context for the 

additional legislation to be considered next week, the Peace Corps 

3

Safety and Security Act of 2004. That bill will create a more independent Inspector General, will establish the position of Ombudsman of the Peace Corps, and will statutorily create the Office of 

Safety and Security. 

[The prepared statement of Mr. Hyde follows:]

PREPARED STATEMENT OF THE HONORABLE HENRY J. HYDE, A REPRESENTATIVE IN

CONGRESS FROM THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, AND CHAIRMAN, COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

Good morning, and welcome to this morning’s hearing of the Committee on International Relations. The purpose of today’s hearing is to examine the safety and security practices of the Peace Corps. The members of this Committee crafted a Peace 

Corps bill last year that authorizes the doubling of the Peace Corps. That measure 

was included in H.R. 1950, which passed the House by a vote of 382 to 42 in July, 

2003. Next week, the Committee will consider additional legislation intended to improve safety and security of our Peace Corps volunteers. Today, we will hear from 

a distinguished group of witnesses, each with firsthand experience in matters of 

safety and security of Peace Corps volunteers. 

We come here as supporters of the Peace Corps; admirers of their sacrifice and 

of the important work they do. It is for that reason that today we wish to inquire 

into the adequacy of safety and security practices that will govern their assignment 

in dangerous places around the world. 

Instead of a lengthy opening statement, I would like to read for you brief excerpts 

from three important documents on this topic, which we will explore and refer to 

throughout today’s hearing. 

The first excerpt is from a GAO report on Peace Corps safety and security, dated 

in July 2002:

The Peace Corps is embarking on a major expansion of its volunteer workforce 

during a time of heightened risk for Americans living abroad. Providing safety 

and security for its volunteers is the Peace Corps’ highest priority. Our review 

of the agency’s efforts to ensure compliance with its basic safety and security 

policies and guidelines shows that there are cases of uneven implementation of 

key elements of the safety and security framework that could pose risks to volunteers. These include uneven performance in developing safe and secure housing 

and work sites, responding to volunteer concerns, and planning for emergencies.

The second excerpt is from a recent investigative series by the Dayton Daily 

News, dated October 27, 2003:

Every minute of every day for more than two and a half years now, Walter 

and Sheila Poirier have lived with a grim reality: They may never know what 

happened to their son. 

‘‘Our concentration is still on finding Walter,’’ Sheila said. ‘‘He’s probably not 

alive, but he may be alive.’’

Long ago, their grief turned to anger, and their anger is directed squarely at 

the Peace Corps. They believe the agency should have been watching more closely. 

And they’re not alone. 

‘‘We believe that the Peace Corps severely failed their people, their volunteers, 

and knowing what I know, there is no way I would let my children volunteer 

for the Peace Corps unless there was some immediate changes and serious 

changes in the Peace Corps,’’ said the General Accounting Office’s Patrick Sullivan, who spent 23 years as a U.S. Secret Service special agent. ‘‘There’s no way 

I’d put my children or recommend to anybody I know to put their loved ones in 

that situation.’’[Endquote] 

Sullivan and John Cooney went to Bolivia on behalf of the GAO’s Office of 

Special Investigations to review the Peace Corps’ handling of the case.

The third excerpt is from the GAO report referenced in the previous excerpt, 

dated July 20, 2001. It reads as follows:

Both the Country Director and Deputy Country Director for the Peace Corps 

in Bolivia told us [the GAO] that the Associate Director was not keeping close 

enough contact with Mr. Poirier.

The report also states:

4

The Associate Director also said that he became so busy supervising the other 

volunteers that Mr. Poirier ‘‘dropped off my radar screen.’’ He said he made no 

further attempt to contact Mr. Poirier.

The GAO report is summarized in the following statement:

The Peace Corps failed to properly supervise Mr. Poirier and lost track of him.

The purpose of today’s hearing is to understand the Peace Corps’ efforts to develop and ensure compliance with basic safety and security policies for Peace Corps 

volunteers. Today’s hearing will provide members with necessary background information on the problems that have existed in recent years, and, as a case study, will 

examine the specific problems and management failures that led to and followed the 

disappearance of a volunteer in Bolivia, Walter J. Poirier. 

The hearing will provide members with an opportunity to understand the policy 

and organizational changes made within the Peace Corps over the past two years 

toward the goal of improving safety and security of volunteers. The hearing will also 

provide members with the context for the additional legislation to be considered 

next week, the ‘‘Peace Corps Safety and Security Act of 2004’’. That bill will create 

a more independent Inspector General, will establish the position of ‘‘Ombudsman’’ 

of the Peace Corps, and will statutorily create the Office of Safety and Security. 

I look forward to today’s hearing, and I now recognize my friend and colleague, 

the distinguished ranking member from California, Tom Lantos.

Chairman HYDE. I look forward to today’s hearing, and I now am 

pleased to yield to my friend and colleague, the distinguished 

Ranking Member from California, Tom Lantos. 

Mr. LANTOS. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. I want to 

thank you for calling this important hearing on the safety and security of Peace Corps Volunteers. 

As these generous hearted volunteers continue to serve our country as ambassadors of hope and renewal to villages and towns 

across the globe, their well being must continue to be one of our 

highest priorities. 

Mr. Chairman, in 1961, President John Kennedy established the 

Peace Corps to draw from an immense reservoir of men and women 

who were anxious to dedicate their time and toil to the cause of 

both peace and human progress. 

Volunteers were expected to transcend the political divides of 

their day and work in true fellowship with local communities to 

support their development. In the process, this first generation of 

volunteers helped foster a greater understanding of American values and our culture abroad, as well as a better appreciation of 

other cultures and peoples by American citizens. 

This month we celebrate the 43rd year of distinguished service 

by Peace Corps Volunteers in meeting these goals. Since the Peace 

Corps was established, more than 170,000 volunteers worked on 

behalf of humanity and our nation in 137 countries. They have successfully accomplished an enormous array of important projects, 

not the least of which is the aid the Peace Corps Volunteers lent 

to a young man named Alejandro Toledo. 

As one of 16 children, Toledo was raised in the struggling port 

village of Chimbote, Peru, by a family of extremely modest means. 

At age 16, with the help of Peace Corps Volunteers, Toledo secured 

a 1-year scholarship to study economics at the University of San 

Francisco in my district. 

He later continued his education at Stanford, worked for an 

international organization and eventually was elected President of 

Peru, the first of its indigenous people to lead that country. Last 

5

year, President Toledo welcomed the Peace Corps back to Peru 

after a 27 year absence. 

Many volunteers, like the ones who helped give the current 

President of Peru a running start in life, are from my home state 

of California. Of the 170,000 Peace Corps Volunteers since 1961, 

some 25,000 were from the State of California. Today, 15 of my 

constituents in my congressional district are serving as Peace 

Corps Volunteers in Latin America, Europe, Africa, the Middle 

East and Asia. 

I ask unanimous consent, Mr. Chairman, that these 15 names, 

the countries where they serve and the dates of service be entered 

into the record, and I applaud all of them for their dedication and 

commitment. 

Chairman HYDE. Without objection. So ordered. 

[The information referred to follows:]

6


92743a.eps
7

Mr. LANTOS. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. 

Mr. Chairman, the horrific attacks of September 11, 2001, transformed how Americans view the world. The terrorist attacks also 

exposed many in our country to other people’s perceptions or 

misperceptions about both our nation and our values. 

I have stated on numerous previous occasions before this Committee my belief that we have been neglecting our many traditional 

public diplomacy efforts. In addition to repairing the damage to 

public diplomacy instruments at the State Department, I believe 

that the expansion of the Peace Corps, particularly in predominantly Muslim countries, can go a long way to helping the people 

of other nations achieve a better understanding of the United 

States. 

Mr. Chairman, as President Kennedy anticipated, life in the 

Peace Corps is not easy. Volunteers often live in simple huts with 

no electricity or running water and the ever present possibility of 

unwelcome guests like cobras and scorpions. 

They receive only a small stipend to meet their basic needs during their service abroad and a modest readjustment allowance after 

their duty is completed. Many times, volunteers are posted in communities where the nearest American is hours or days away. 

Underlying these hardships is the belief that Americans and foreign people best understand one another when they work together 

on the same projects, share the same food and speak the same language. 

Although life in the Peace Corps is not easy, it at least should 

be made safe. Mr. Chairman, I am profoundly disturbed by the 

most recent safety of the volunteers report in which incidents of reported minor sexual assaults against Peace Corps Volunteers 

around the world increased by 275 percent since 1995. 

I am equally concerned about the plans of the agency to expand 

its programming in certain regions, most notably the inter American and Pacific region, where incidents of major sexual assaults 

were 63 percent higher than in Africa, Europe or Asia over the 

same 6-year period. 

Although Latin America should be a top priority for receiving 

United States development assistance. We must make sure that we 

do not place more volunteers into high risk areas without first augmenting safety and security precautions for them. 

I am also concerned, Mr. Chairman, about reports that the current leadership of the Office of Medical Services may be treating 

volunteers with questionable medical treatment and hamstringing 

the ability of in-country Peace Corps medical officers to provide the 

best possible standard of care to volunteers by slashing their budgets for vital medications and vaccines. 

Mr. Chairman, the problems confronting us today around the 

world are towering, but they are neither unprecedented nor insurmountable. Through the dedication, sacrifice and self-reliance of 

Peace Corps Volunteers, our country is better able to meet these 

challenges 

I salute them for their service and pledge to ensure that they 

have the support they need to continue to accomplish the idealistic 

goals set before them over 4 decades ago. 

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. 

8

Chairman HYDE. Thank you, Mr. Lantos. 

The Chair will entertain brief opening statements if there are 

any. Mr. Royce, do you have one? Mr. Bell? 

Mr. BELL. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Today’s hearing is of special significance. Congresswoman McCollum and I had the opportunity to visit with Peace Corps representatives on this very issue 

of security when we were in Jordan last fall. 

Also, a member of my staff, Andy Oler, who is with us today, is 

a recently returned Peace Corps Volunteer who served in Burkina 

Faso, the third poorest country in the world, according to the 2003 

United Nations human development report. He found the work so 

fulfilling that he extended for a 3rd year. Luckily, Andy served his 

time without incident and returned safely home. He followed safety 

recommendations and never felt in danger. 

While Andy and most other volunteers are never harmed during 

their service, serious incidents do occur, as we have heard here 

today. As its first priority, Peace Corps must improve its safety and 

security policies, especially regarding volunteer monitoring, security training and data collection. 

This being said, we must not hamper volunteers’ ability to do 

their work by imposing heavy security restrictions. Frequently, 

American Embassy workers live behind locked gates to protect 

their safety. Peace Corps Volunteers could not be successful in such 

a restrictive security environment, I am sure all of you would 

agree. 

A primary component of a Peace Corps Volunteer’s work is cultural integration and understanding achieved through community 

immersion. Like everyone at this hearing, I am concerned for the 

volunteers who are in the field and for the people whose stories 

brought about this hearing, but how much can we increase Peace 

Corps security presence without compromising the volunteers’ work 

and the agency’s mission? That is the question I hope we can perhaps find some answers to here today. 

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. 

Mr. ROYCE. Mr. Chairman, if I could? 

Chairman HYDE. Yes. Mr. Royce? 

Mr. ROYCE. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I will make an opening 

statement. 

I chair the Africa Subcommittee, and in January of last year I 

had a chance to spend time with several volunteers in Madagascar. 

I know the people of Madagascar appreciated their work. As a 

group, they were not up to full force there because, frankly, they 

had been pulled out of the country when political turmoil hit Madagascar during a very contentious political time when elections were 

scheduled in country. 

These particular individuals had made the decision, knowing the 

dangers, to return to Madagascar after there was more stability. 

The job of the Peace Corps Volunteer is inherently dangerous. It 

always has been dangerous. Volunteers go to very difficult places 

in very remote locales. 

In the post 9/11 world, unfortunately, the challenges of safety are 

only growing, but I do not think anyone is suggesting that we recoil. On the contrary, now more than ever, we should be doing 

more. I think the President recognizes this. I think that is the viVerDate Mar 21 2002 10:27 Jul 13, 2004 Jkt 092188 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6601 F:\WORK\FULL\032404\92743.000 HINTREL1 PsN: SHIRL
9

sion that he has set out to expand the Peace Corps, to double the 

size. 

As Director Vasquez knows, personally, I would like to see the 

Peace Corps return to Sierra Leone. I understand our Ambassador 

to Freetown is pressing for their return. At the same time, we need 

to do all we can to promote security, and that is the purpose of this 

hearing. 

It is my understanding that the Peace Corps is very up front 

about the risks with potential volunteers these days. This hearing 

will do more to advertise that risk to potential volunteers to notify 

of that risk. I understand that Director Vasquez, based upon the 

statements we have here, is going to state that safety is the number one priority of the Peace Corps. That is as it should be, and 

it is our responsibility as a Committee here with oversight to make 

certain that safety is the number one responsibility for the Peace 

Corps. 

Mr. Chairman, I thank you for holding this hearing. 

Chairman HYDE. Thank you, Mr. Royce. 

Ms. McCollum? 

Ms. MCCOLLUM. Thank you. I would like to welcome the witnesses this morning. 

Chairman Hyde, thank you for holding this hearing and giving 

the Committee an opportunity to ensure that the thousands of 

Americans who serve our country as Peace Corps Volunteers in distant lands are safe, healthy and successful in their service. 

This means the Peace Corps staff in Washington, as well as 

country staff, have the resources and the tools they need to keep 

the volunteers safe. Peace Corps is truly a gift that the American 

people give to the world, and I am a big fan of your agency, Mr. 

Director. 

I have visited Peace Corps staff and volunteers in South Africa, 

as well as recruiting staff and return volunteers back home in Minnesota on numerous occasions. We should all be proud of their commitment, service and sacrifice to our country and the communities 

they serve, often in very, very challenging circumstances. One of 

my staff is very proud that his 67-year-old grandmother recently 

arrived in Botswana to work on an HIV/AIDS project as a Peace 

Corps Volunteer. 

Let me say once again that I strongly support the President’s 

proposal to double the number of Peace Corps Volunteers, and I 

hope Congress will give Peace Corps the resources it needs to help 

meet the President’s goal, and that also means the resources to 

keep volunteers safe and healthy. 

Thank you. 

Chairman HYDE. Thank you, Ms. McCollum. 

The gentleman from New York, Mr. Houghton? No statement. 

Mr. Weller? No statement. 

Our first witness, Mr. Gaddi Vasquez, is a graduate of the University of Redlands, and he began his 22 year career in public service as a police officer in Orange, California. 

He served as an appointee to former California Governors Pete 

Wilson and George Deukmejian and was appointed by former 

President George H. W. Bush to Federal commissions. He was 

10

nominated by President George W. Bush to serve as Director of the 

Peace Corps, and we welcome Mr. Vasquez. 

We are honored to have you appear before the Committee today. 

If you would proceed with a 5-minute, give or take, summary of 

your statement? Your full statement will be made a part of the 

record. 

Then at the conclusion of your statement if you would make 

yourself comfortable, and we will have a second panel, and then 

after the second panel has testified if you would return to the table, 

we will then have questions. That way we can make sure everybody gets a chance to ask a question, if you do not mind. 

Thank you. Please proceed with your statement. 

STATEMENT OF THE HONORABLE GADDI H. VASQUEZ, 

DIRECTOR, THE PEACE CORPS 

Mr. VASQUEZ. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I will be providing you 

today with——

Chairman HYDE. Is your microphone on? 

Mr. VASQUEZ. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I will be providing you 

today with an abbreviated version of my testimony, and I would 

like to submit the full written version with some additional material for the record. 

Mr. Chairman and Members of the Committee, I am pleased to 

appear before your Committee today, and I appreciate the opportunity to present an overview of the current state of the Peace 

Corps and the many accomplishments which we, as an agency, 

have achieved since my arrival in February 2002. 

Mr. Chairman, I also appreciate the ongoing support that you 

and this Committee have shown for the Peace Corps. While I understand that the purpose of today’s hearing is to discuss the safety 

and security framework that has been designed to protect Peace 

Corps Volunteers, let me begin with some general comments about 

the Peace Corps and our goals. 

Over 170,000 Americans have served as Peace Corps Volunteers 

since 1961. The volunteers have helped dispel misconceptions about 

Americans, assisted in fostering positive relationships with host 

country nationals, promoted sustainable development, and returned 

back home with messages about life overseas, the people they have 

served and the cultures they have experienced. 

The core values of the Peace Corps and the grassroots work that 

President John F. Kennedy envisioned when he established the 

Peace Corps remain relevant, vital and strong. 

It has been an exciting time at this agency as we continue to 

carry out President Bush’s call to public service and his goal to increase the number of Peace Corps Volunteers serving in the field. 

However, since the amounts provided in the appropriations process 

for the past 2 years have fallen significantly short of those needed 

to meet the goal of doubling the number of volunteers, we are pursuing the strongest growth possible within the constraints of our 

resources while preserving the quality of the Peace Corps Volunteer experience and focusing on safety and security. 

I am happy to report that in September 2003, the Peace Corps 

achieved a 28 year high with 7,533 volunteers working in the areas 

11

of agriculture, business development, education, the environment, 

health and HIV/AIDS, and youth development. 

I will now move to the important issue of volunteer safety. I will 

start by reaffirming that the safety and security of each volunteer 

is the agency’s top priority. While the Peace Corps will never be 

able to issue an absolute guarantee, we remain committed to delivering and developing optimum conditions for a safe and fulfilling 

experience for every Peace Corps Volunteer. 

Safety and security issues are fully integrated in all aspects of 

volunteer recruitment, training and service with an emphasis on 

volunteers taking personal responsibility at all times and integrating into communities. Information provided throughout the recruitment and application process includes key messages that 

being a volunteer involves risks, the volunteers can and are expected to adopt safe lifestyles, and that the Peace Corps has an effective safety support system in place. 

Since taking office in February 2002, I am always mindful of the 

new security environment that September 11 placed on overseas 

organizations like the Peace Corps. Based on my personal experience as a former public safety official and aided by suggestions of 

others in the agency and recommendations from the GAO, the 

Peace Corps has taken the initiative to create and implement a 

number of safety enhancements. 

In 2002, I approved a reorganization that created a new Office 

of Safety and Security and increased by 80 the number of full-time 

safety and security staff, of which 95 percent are deployed in the 

field. The staff includes a new associate director for safety and security, a chief compliance officer, a research psychologist, nine regionally based safety and security officers and 71 safety and security coordinators, one at each Peace Corps post. 

It is also vital that volunteers know how to handle emergency 

situations, whether it is one volunteer in an accident or all volunteers in one country who need to be evacuated. As you may know, 

we recently suspended our program in Haiti due to the civil unrest. 

This has been the sixth successful evacuation during my tenure as 

director. 

Whether it is civil unrest, war or the outbreak of SARS, the 

Peace Corps is diligent in monitoring the safety and security at 

each post and will not hesitate to take action should the need arise 

to move our volunteers out of harm’s way. 

While establishing new training procedures, expanding staff resources and ensuring compliance are important, the ultimate evaluation should be measured by results. During the past 2 years, the 

Peace Corps has experienced a significant drop in volunteer deaths, 

major sexual assaults and minor assaults. For example, the rate of 

serious sexual assault events is down 1⁄3 since 1997. 

However, in the unfortunate situation when a violent crime 

against a volunteer does occur, the Peace Corps has mechanisms 

in place to assist the volunteer in every way possible. 

Last October, I issued a new Peace Corps protocol on violent 

crimes against volunteers which helped clarify the existing duties 

of the Inspector General when a volunteer is the victim of a crime. 

It is important to note that the Peace Corps maintains a healthy 

working relationship with the Office of the Inspector General. We 

12

take that report very seriously in the field and at headquarters, 

and our chief compliance officer checks to ensure that we appropriately follow up on their recommendations. 

As you may know, the Peace Corps is a unique Federal agency 

in that most employees are limited to serving the agency for 5 

years. Recently, Congress gave the Peace Corps authority to exempt certain positions associated with safety and security from the 

5-year rule. I have designated our first group of 23 exempt positions of which 19 are in our newly reorganized Office of Safety and 

Security. 

Mr. Chairman, in conclusion, our agency has accomplished a 

great deal over the past 24 months in both safety and security and 

the growth of our programs. I am grateful to you and Members of 

the Committee for your continued support of the Peace Corps mission. 

I believe that the Peace Corps is well positioned to safely, and 

I emphasize safely, achieve expansion and build upon the successes 

of the past 43 years. 

Mr. Chairman, I thank you for this opportunity. 

[The prepared statement of Mr. Vasquez follows:]

PREPARED STATEMENT OF THE HONORABLE GADDI H. VASQUEZ, DIRECTOR, THE

PEACE CORPS

Mr. Chairman and Members of the Committee: 

I am pleased to appear before your Committee today. I appreciate the opportunity 

to present an overview of the current state of the Peace Corps and the many accomplishments, which we, as an agency, have achieved since my arrival in February 

2002. Mr. Chairman, I also appreciate the on-going support that you and many 

Members of this Committee have shown for the Peace Corps, and I would be remiss 

if I did not take a moment to encourage Members of the Committee to visit Peace 

Corps Volunteers should you travel to any of the 71 countries in which we operate. 

Seeing the Volunteers firsthand can give you a heightened appreciation for the remarkable service our American men and women perform overseas. Whether teaching schoolchildren in Kazakhstan how to use the Internet, or assisting a community 

in Namibia to build a solar-powered oven, seeing the Volunteers in action makes 

you proud of these Americans who are serving their country in nations around the 

world. If you are traveling to a country in which the Peace Corps has a program, 

please let us know and we will make every effort to connect you with a Volunteer. 

After meeting them, I know you will share in our enthusiasm to ensure the Peace 

Corps continues as a world-class organization, promoting world peace and friendship 

abroad. 

While I understand the purpose of today’s hearing is to discuss the safety and security framework that has been designed to protect Peace Corps Volunteers, let me 

begin with some general comments about the Peace Corps and our goals. Earlier 

this month, we celebrated the Peace Corps’ 43rd anniversary. We have learned valuable lessons over the last 43 years. Over 170,000 Americans have served as Peace 

Corps Volunteers. The Volunteers have helped dispel misconceptions about Americans, assisted in fostering positive relationships with host country nationals, promoted sustainable development, and returned back home with messages about life 

overseas, the people they have served, and the cultures they have experienced. The 

core values of the Peace Corps and the grassroots work that President John F. Kennedy envisioned when he signed the Executive Order establishing the Peace Corps 

on March 1, 1961, remain relevant, vital, and strong. 

These are the Peace Corps goals that we continue to promote:

• to help the people of interested countries and areas in meeting their need for 

trained men and women;

• to help promote a better understanding of Americans on the part of the peoples served; and

• to bring that information back home to help promote a better understanding 

of other peoples on the part of Americans.

13

This past year has brought many accomplishments. It has been an exciting time 

at the agency as we continue to carry out President Bush’s call to public service and 

his goal to increase the number of Peace Corps Volunteers serving in the field. Mr. 

Chairman, the Peace Corps is pleased to be on a pathway for growth. However, 

since the amounts provided in the appropriations process for the past two years 

have fallen significantly short of that needed to meet the goal of doubling the number of Volunteers, we are pursuing the strongest growth possible within the constraints of our resources. 

Yet, I am happy to report that in September 2003, the Peace Corps achieved a 

28-year high with 7,533 Volunteers working in 71 countries in the areas of agriculture, business development, education, the environment, health and HIV/AIDS 

education and prevention, and youth development. 

By knowing local cultures and communicating in local languages, the Peace Corps 

continues to be actively engaged in activities addressing HIV/AIDS, at the grassroots level, providing over two million service hours a year. Fighting the ravages 

of this disease is paramount to the survival of people across the globe, and important to this agency. All Volunteers who serve in our 26 African nations—regardless 

of their program sector—are trained to provide HIV/AIDS prevention and education. 

In fiscal year 2003, for example, we re-entered the countries of Botswana and Swaziland exclusively to address the HIV/AIDS epidemic. We are also collaborating with 

the Office of the Global AIDS Coordinator to continue our work in this arena and 

seeking to assist in meeting the President’s challenge to provide treatment to 2 million HIV-infected people; prevent 7 million new infections; and, offer care to 10 million people infected and affected by HIV/AIDS, including orphans and vulnerable 

children. 

In addition, Peace Corps Volunteers remain committed to serving in countries 

with predominantly Muslim populations. This has been true since the Peace Corps’ 

inception in 1961. Currently, almost 20% percent of our Volunteers are serving in 

nations with predominately Muslim populations in West and North Africa, the Middle East, Europe, and Central Asia. Three out of four of our new country entries 

in 2003 were in predominately Muslim countries—Albania, Azerbaijan, and Chad—

bringing our total program involvement from 14 nations in 2002 to 17 in 2004. The 

Peace Corps’ mission in these regions matches our efforts worldwide and continues 

to be important. Host communities are exposed to positive and personal images of 

Americans, and returning Volunteers share their new understanding of these different cultures with friends and family in the United States. 

NEW INITIATIVES AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS

Last fall, we launched a new national recruiting campaign to attract new Volunteers and increase diversity. The campaign theme—‘‘Life is calling. How far will you 

go?’’—was designed to touch the hearts, enlighten the minds, and inspire the spirits 

of the next wave of Peace Corps Volunteers. It included new recruiting materials, 

a re-designed website, updated recruitment videos, and new public service announcements. The response has been tremendous. Over the past year, Volunteer applications have increased by nearly 12 percent and, since the launch of the re-designed website, online inquiries are up 44 percent. Applications now completed online have jumped to 81 percent of all applications submitted; this is an increase 

from 42 percent in 2001. Applications from Latinos, African-Americans, Native 

Americans, and Asian-Americans are also up by 10 percent. The bottom line is that 

Americans want to serve and there are developing countries that want and need not 

only the skills of our citizens, but also want to build relationships that help further 

world peace and friendship. 

In February of this year, the Peace Corps and the American Association of Community Colleges unveiled a new, groundbreaking recruitment initiative that will increase awareness of opportunities for specially trained Americans to share their 

skills internationally. It will allow those with the experience and occupational and 

technical skills—such as licensed nurses and trained information technology experts—to respond to the critical needs of countries where Peace Corps Volunteers 

serve. The rollout was launched in four different regions of the United States—

Washington D.C., Colorado, California, and Minnesota—and has been met with an 

overwhelming positive response. In fact, many community colleges nationwide are 

expanding their international programs and view Peace Corps service as a tremendous opportunity to enhance their graduates’ professional careers. 

On November 12, 2003, I signed an historic agreement that will lead to Peace 

Corps Volunteers serving in Mexico for the first time. This innovative partnership 

will allow Volunteers to join along side the National Council on Science and Technology (CONACYT) of Mexico and work in the areas of information technology, 

14

small business development, and science and technology. The Peace Corps country 

director has been selected and the first group of 15 to 20 Volunteers will arrive in 

Mexico this fall. 

TRAVEL TO PEACE CORPS COUNTRIES

Over the past year, I have also had the privilege to travel to 12 different Peace 

Corps countries from Central America, to Africa, Eastern Europe, and the Pacific. 

During each visit, I met with Volunteers, host government officials, and representatives of our U.S. missions abroad. The support and enthusiasm I have received from 

each of these groups remains very high. In Fiji, for example, I was approached by 

a man in his mid-thirties, asking if I was the Peace Corps Director. The man stated 

that he had recognized me from the news the night before and was very excited that 

Peace Corps had returned to Fiji. He went on to explain that as a young boy he 

was taught by Peace Corps Volunteers and has never forgotten them. This type of 

story is repeated to me over and over throughout my travels. The Peace Corps continues to leave a lasting legacy across the globe, which I experience each time I am 

abroad. 

While the world today is very different from 1961 when Peace Corps began, and 

even more so since September 11th—the American spirit of sharing with others remains a fundamental part of our democratic society. 

Just last week, I returned from Guatemala where, on behalf of the Peace Corps, 

I received the Orden del Quetzal from Guatemalan President O ́ scar Berger 

Perdomo. President Berger recognized the distinguished service that Peace Corps 

Volunteers have given to the nation of Guatemala over the past 40 years. The 

award acknowledged the work of our former and current Volunteers in strengthening the friendship, harmony, and good will between our two countries. The presentation reminded those in attendance of the remarkable contribution that close to 

4,500 Volunteers have given to the people of Guatemala through their hard work 

and enthusiasm. I was truly honored to receive this award, on behalf of the Peace 

Corps, from the Guatemalan government. 

VOLUNTEER SAFETY AND SECURITY: OUR OVERARCHING PRIORITY

I will now move to the important issue of Volunteer safety. I will start by reaffirming that the safety and security of each Volunteer is the agency’s top priority. 

All 16 Peace Corps directors, beginning with Sargent Shriver, the agency’s first director, have placed a high priority on Volunteer safety and security. While the Peace 

Corps will never be able to issue an absolute guarantee, we remain committed to 

developing optimum conditions for a safe and fulfilling experience for every Peace 

Corps Volunteer. 

Safety and security issues are fully integrated in all aspects of Volunteer recruitment, training, and service, with an emphasis on Volunteers taking personal responsibility at all times and assimilating into communities. Information provided 

throughout the recruitment and application process—to recruiters, on the recruitment website, in printed application materials, informational booklets and educational videos, during the two days of staging, and the 10 to 12 weeks of in-country 

pre-service training—all includes the key messages that being a Volunteer involves 

risk, that Volunteers can and are expected to adopt safe lifestyles, and that the 

Peace Corps has an effective safety support system in place. 

Since taking office in February 2002, I have made the safety and security of Volunteers my number one priority, and I am always mindful of the new security environment that September 11th placed on overseas organizations like the Peace 

Corps. 

Based on my personal experience as a former public safety official, and aided by 

suggestions of others in the agency, the recommendations and findings from the 

General Accounting Office’s July 2002 report on Volunteer safety, and Volunteers 

in the field, the Peace Corps has taken the initiative to create and implement a 

number of safety enhancements. In 2002, I approved a reorganization that created 

a new Office of Safety and Security and increased by 80 people the number of fulltime safety and security staff, ninety-five percent of which are deployed overseas. 

This staff, which includes a new associate director of safety and security, a chief 

compliance officer, a research psychologist, nine regionally-based safety and security 

officers, and a safety and security desk officer for each Peace Corps region, was restructured to better communicate, supervise, monitor and help set safety and security policy. In addition, all 71 Peace Corps posts have established a safety and security coordinator in country to oversee Volunteer safety issues in the field. 

Other new initiatives in safety and security include:

15

• The creation of new standard operating procedures and a new standard template for posts in developing their Emergency Action Plans;

• The implementation and compliance of new procedures for Volunteer/Trainee 

Safety and Security (Manual Section 270) to measure and monitor posts’ compliance with important safety and security requirements;

• The addition of the equivalent of one full day of safety and security training 

during a two-day pre-departure orientation (staging) for new trainees;

• The establishment of regular safety and security staff training on a two-year 

cycle;

• An enhancement of the safety and security information message that a potential applicant receives from his or her first contact with Peace Corps—during 

recruitment and throughout the application process; and

• The availability of safety and security information on the Peace Corps’ 

website.

The new staff, the new compliance tools, the additional documentation, and the 

restructured Office of Safety and Security have all been designed to bring greater 

standardization and accountability to the safety and security function. 

It is important to note that the Peace Corps’ core safety and security philosophy 

is one of Volunteer acceptance and integration into the local community. This necessitates the thoughtful design of viable projects, the adaptation of Volunteers into 

their new sites and cultures, and the development of the Volunteers network of support. A safe and secure Volunteer is one who is working in the community on a welldesigned project. In all programming, the Peace Corps works to ensure Volunteers 

have clearly defined job assignments. The technical training component of pre-service training prepares Volunteers with the essential competencies to successfully perform their work in their program sector. Eighty percent of pre-service training involves some community based training in order to simulate real-life experiences in 

the workplace, home, and community. Solid training and jobs enable Volunteers to 

become more quickly involved in their work, build a support network that includes 

their new colleagues, and produce measurable project outcomes. These factors lead 

to higher rates of Volunteer job satisfaction, which is important to Volunteer safety. 

While the pre-service training contains many important technical components, 

language, cultural nuances, and safety and security training are key factors in preparing a Volunteer for integration into the host community and laying the groundwork for a safe and fulfilling Volunteer experience. High quality, practical cross-cultural training is also a cornerstone of Volunteer training. At the conclusion of preservice training, ‘‘trainees’’ must pass a series of core competencies before being 

sworn in as full-fledged Peace Corps Volunteers. These core competencies require 

trainees to demonstrate an understanding of issues such as personal safety strategies, dealing with unwanted attention, identifying risk factors and strategies for 

avoiding risk, and the importance of incident reporting. They must also be able to 

communicate basic messages in the local language, exhibit an understanding of 

Peace Corps policies, as well as know their roles and responsibilities in the Emergency Action Plan. 

It is vital that Volunteers know how to handle emergency situations, whether it 

is one Volunteer in an accident or all Volunteers in one country who need to be 

evacuated. As you may know, we recently suspended our program in Haiti, due to 

the civil unrest, and brought our 76 Volunteers home. This has been the sixth successful evacuation during my tenure as Director—the 10th since the fall of 2001—

impacting 908 Volunteers. Whether it is civil unrest, war, or the outbreak of SARS, 

the Peace Corps is diligent in monitoring the safety and security at each post and 

will not hesitate to take action should the need arise to move our Volunteers out 

of harm’s way. 

In the activation of an Emergency Action Plan, as well as in more isolated emergencies—such as notification of a serious illness of a family member at home—the 

Peace Corps needs to be able to reach Volunteers at their sites. The Peace Corps 

makes use of all available and appropriate technology to communicate with Volunteers. As technology evolves, so does the Volunteers’ use of technology. In some 

countries, where cell phones are readily available, reliable, and widely used, almost 

all Peace Corps Volunteers will have one. For example, almost 100 percent of the 

Volunteers in South Africa have cell phones. In others, where cell phone coverage 

is non-existent or sporadic at best, Volunteers make use of the best parts of the 

communications infrastructure of that country. For instance, in the South Pacific Islands, cell phone systems are not available. Instead, solar-powered landlines are 

available to be used by Volunteers with Iridium phones as back up with the Volunteer Leaders. Overall, posts use a combination of cell phones, landlines, solar-powVerDate Mar 21 2002 10:27 Jul 13, 2004 Jkt 092188 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6621 F:\WORK\FULL\032404\92743.000 HINTREL1 PsN: SHIRL
16

ered landlines, email, beepers, radios, and message relay systems to reach Volunteers on a regular basis and in emergency situations. Furthermore, when Peace 

Corps Volunteers are placed in communities around the world, they have a circle 

of support around them that includes local host country nationals as well as Peace 

Corps staff. As would be the case here in the United States, if a person were in 

distress, friends, neighbors, colleagues, host country counterparts, and local police 

are available to assist with the situation and to send and receive emergency messages. 

The Peace Corps uses four key elements in establishing and maintaining its safety and security framework for Volunteers and staff: research, planning, training, 

and compliance. Safety and security information is tracked and analyzed on an ongoing basis. The data analysis, conducted now by our new safety and security research psychologist, is used to enhance existing policies or develop new policies and 

procedures, as needed. Our research psychologist also periodically corroborates statistical data on crimes against Volunteers with the Department of State’s Crime Division, the only division solely dedicated as an official repository of crime statistics. 

After careful analysis and planning, changes are being integrated throughout the 

agency. The training of Volunteers includes the most up-to-date safety and security 

information available. Lastly, compliance is essential to ensure that safety and security measures are adhered to and remain a top priority over the course of time. 

Each of these components helps create a framework to safeguard the well being of 

Volunteers and staff, enabling them to carry out the Peace Corps’ mission. 

STATISTICAL RESULTS

While establishing new training procedures, expanding staff resources and insuring compliance are important; the ultimate evaluation should be measured by results. During the past two years, the Peace Corps has experienced a significant drop 

in Volunteer deaths, major sexual assaults, and minor assaults. The rate of serious 

sexual assault events is down one-third since 1997. Additional statistical data 

shows:

• In 2002, Peace Corps experienced a 27 percent decline in the rate of major 

sexual assault events from 2001;[T1]

• In 2002, we experienced a 13 percent decrease in the rate of rape events from 

2001;

• Since 1997, we have had a 36 percent decrease in the rate of rape events; 

and,

• The rate of major physical assault events, with minor fluctuations, has remained steady over the last 6 years.

In addition to the statistical data, the most effective tool for gauging success is 

to ask Volunteers. Every two years, the Peace Corps conducts a global survey to 

measure the levels of Volunteer satisfaction with programming, safety, medical, and 

other key indicators. In the most recent global volunteer survey, which had a 68 

percent response rate (itself a high response rate):

• 97 percent of the respondents replied that they felt ‘‘very safe’’ to ‘‘adequately 

safe’’ where they live;

• 99 percent of the respondents felt ‘‘very safe’’ to ‘‘adequately safe’’ where they 

work;

• 84 percent of the volunteers felt ‘‘very safe’’ to ‘‘adequately safe’’ when they 

traveled; and,

• 89 percent—overwhelmingly responded in the affirmative when asked if they 

would make the same decision to join the Peace Corps. 

NEW PROTOCOL ON VIOLENT CRIMES AGAINST VOLUNTEERS

Notwithstanding that Volunteers largely feel safe where they are living and working, safety incidents do occur. One assault against a Volunteer is one too many. We 

take each incident very seriously and mobilize all of our resources to assist Volunteers in need. Whether the crime is that of theft of a Volunteer’s property or a major 

sexual assault, the Peace Corps has trained, professional, caring staff in place to immediately respond and bring appropriate medical attention, counseling, and law enforcement to aid the Volunteer. In some situations, Volunteers are medically evacuated to the United States to receive focused care and treatment. 

As I have explained, the Office of Safety and Security takes extensive measures 

to ensure that the agency is effectively working to prevent crimes against Volunteers. In addition to the extensive training, this office also collects data to analyze 

17

crime trends to help inform policy and prevent future incidents. For instance, the 

data indicates that Volunteers are most at risk for a major physical assault on a 

Saturday or Sunday between the hours of 7:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. in an urban, public area. Such risk factors are repeatedly emphasized to Volunteers during training 

so they can minimize their risk of becoming a victim. Volunteers are instructed on 

how to take personal responsibility to avoid risky situations and modify their behavior to protect themselves. 

However, in the unfortunate situation when a violent crime against a Volunteer 

does occur, the Peace Corps has mechanisms in place to assist the Volunteer in 

every way possible. I have mentioned medical care and counseling. Allow me to turn 

to the issue of investigation and prosecution and the role of the Peace Corps Office 

of the Inspector General. 

Last October, I issued a new Peace Corps ‘‘Protocol on Violent Crimes Against 

Volunteers,’’ which helped clarify the existing duties of the Inspector General when 

a Volunteer is a victim of a violent crime. Specifically, the Inspector General has 

a coordinating role and is charged with reviewing the investigation efforts of local 

officials, conducting appropriate follow-up actions to support an investigation, and 

assisting in the prosecution. As appropriate, the Office of the Inspector General escorts the Volunteer or former Volunteer back for host-nation investigative and prosecutorial proceedings. 

With the restructuring of the new Office of Safety and Security, and to benefit 

the service to Volunteers and this agency, I was pleased to comply with the Office 

of the Inspector General’s request to more formally clarify to the agency the responsibilities of the Office of Inspector General in following up on violent crimes against 

Volunteers. While this protocol was simply a clarification of existing duties, I can 

also report that I have consistently increased the Office of Inspector General’s budget, which has risen by 30 percent since 2002. 

The Peace Corps maintains a healthy working relationship with the Office of the 

Inspector General, which operates as an independent entity under the Inspector 

General Act, not the Peace Corps Act. As an independent office that audits our financial functions, evaluates the management and program operations, and investigates allegations of criminal activity, the Office of the Inspector General plays an 

important oversight role in evaluating and identifying areas and processes in the 

agency that require immediate attention as well as long-term improvement. We take 

their reports very seriously in the field and at Headquarters, and our Chief Compliance Officer checks to ensure that we appropriately follow up on their recommendations. For example, the Inspector General brought it to my attention that many 

problems existed with Volunteer hostels, which often draw Volunteers away from 

their sites and away from making lasting relationships with members of their community. After a thorough assessment, our Peace Corps manual was revised prohibiting the Peace Corps from providing, sanctioning, or condoning the use of hostels 

unless previously approved by the Director. This decision was not met favorably by 

many Volunteers, yet based on the Inspector General’s report, was in the best interest of the agency. I look forward to continuing our balanced working relationship 

that values both the Office of the Inspector General’s independence and recommendations. 

PROPOSED LEGISLATIVE CHANGES

I understand this Committee intends to consider legislation in the near future 

that will impact the Peace Corps. One of the major strengths of the Peace Corps 

Act is that it is a broad authorization, which has over the years, given ample opportunity for the agency to maintain its independence and its effectiveness. Congress 

set forth broad objectives, and let the Executive Branch, in consultation with the 

host government or its peoples and Congress[T2], establish programs that meet the 

individual needs of each country. Few agencies have been so successfully and efficiently managed over such a long period. To maintain our effectiveness in an era 

of continued growth and opportunity requires that management has the flexibility 

to make decisions that best serve the agency and, most importantly, the Volunteers. 

We do not believe that it is in the best interest of this agency to pursue any of the 

legislative changes that we understand the committee plans to consider. 

As noted above, the Peace Corps currently has a positive and independent working relationship with the Office of Inspector General, as a Designated Federal Entity under the Inspector General Act of 1978. The budget for the office has consistently increased over the last three years, with a current budget of $2.55 million in 

fiscal year 2004 supporting 17 positions (the total budget for the agency is $308 million). Given the size of our agency and funding level, we find this arrangement appropriate and in line with similar agencies of our size and stature. Other agencies 

18

where the Inspector General is appointed by the head of an agency include AMTRAK, the Federal Reserve, EEOC, and SEC. The President appoints Inspector 

Generals at large departments and agencies, such as DOD, Commerce Department, 

Department of Education, HHS, and HUD. 

Secondly, we find it unnecessary to permanently institute an Office of the Ombudsman. This new statutory requirement would be duplicative on many levels, diluting the authority already granted to the Office of the Inspector General. Given 

the broad parameters that we understand the legislation would create for the Ombudsman, it could actually conflict with the Inspector General’s existing jurisdictional authority and could artificially interrupt standard review procedures. In addition, the agency is in the process of considering establishing an internal liaison to 

facilitate post-medical services issues on behalf of returning Volunteers—an item I 

will address further at the close of my remarks. Again, while the idea may have 

merit, we do not see the creation of such an office as an appropriate use of our agency’s funds. 

IMPACT OF THE 5-YEAR RULE

As you may know, the Peace Corps is a unique federal agency in that most employees are limited to serving the agency for five years, though we are permitted 

to extend the service of a limited number of employees past the five-year mark. This 

creates a dynamic, energetic atmosphere in which Peace Corps staff works hard to 

have a positive impact on the agency during their five-year tenure. Recently, Congress gave the Peace Corps authority to exempt certain positions associated with 

safety and security from the five-year rule. Since this is a departure from our historical employment laws and regulation, I carefully reviewed the positions and formally 

designated our first group of 23 exempt positions on October 29, 2003. Nineteen of 

these positions are in our newly re-organized Office of Safety and Security, which 

is the Peace Corps office primarily responsible for Volunteer safety and security. 

One Safety and Security Desk Officer position in each of the regional directorates 

has been designated, and the position of Director of Quality Improvement in the Office of Medical Services has also been exempted. We believe that these 23 positions 

are the most clear-cut and readily justifiable applications of the new authority, as 

they most directly and obviously impact Volunteer safety. Additionally, the 71 safety 

and security coordinator positions at post are not subject to the five-year rule limitation. 

While these were the most obvious designations, I have ordered that an independent, outside expert be hired to review Peace Corps operations and make recommendations on what additional, second-tier safety-related positions should be 

taken out from under the five-year rule. The review will specifically include the Office of Inspector General. At the conclusion of the expert consultant’s review, I will 

make decisions about any other appropriate exemptions for personnel related to 

safety and security. Because of these on-going activities to implement the five-year 

rule exemption appropriately, we also do not see the necessity of further legislation 

in this regard, which the Committee may soon contemplate. The first 23 positions, 

which directly impact Volunteer safety and security, are now exempt and we expect 

to exempt a number of second-tier positions as we proceed through this process. 

VOLUNTEER CARE

Lastly, let me take a moment to address this issue and reiterate a point that is 

true agency-wide: the Volunteer is at the heart of all Peace Corps programs and 

policies. These are Americans who commit to serving 27 months abroad with the 

hope of making a contribution and a connection to people they do not know and 

often learning a language that they do not speak. Volunteers exhibit great commitment, optimism, and a ‘‘can-do’’ attitude as they work toward sustainable development at the grassroots level in emerging countries. While the circumstances in 

which they work may be challenging, the personal and professional rewards can be 

immeasurable. As an agency, we commit to providing the best experience possible 

to our Volunteers from their first contact with Peace Corps as an applicant to their 

years as a returned Peace Corps Volunteer. The Volunteers are our heart and soul 

and everything this agency does revolves around them. 

Thus, we constantly strive to provide support to our Volunteers and continually 

seek ways to improve. During a Peace Corps Volunteer’s service in the field, the Office of Special Services plays an essential role in our Volunteer support system. For 

instance, the Office of Special Services coordinates the after-hours duty system, 

which provides 24 hours a day, seven days a week coverage for all Volunteers and 

their families. Parents may call this office, at any time, if they need to advise their 

Volunteer of a critical illness or death of a family member. The Office of Special 

19

Services immediately informs the Country Director so that the information is passed 

on to the Volunteer as soon as possible, and arrangements can be made for special 

emergency leave if appropriate. The Office of Special Services also serves as a key 

link with families in the intense time of a country evacuation or the tragic event 

of the death of a Volunteer. This office is also a key resource for staff and volunteers 

in assisting with mental health and behavioral issues. In all of these situations, the 

trained professionals who work in the Office of Special Services strive to provide 

top-quality care, timely information, and supportive service to Peace Corps Volunteers and their families. Here is just a sample of one family’s experience. ‘‘When 

Peace Corps called us about Beth’s accident in Zambia and her life-flight to Pretoria, 

my husband, Gerry, immediately flew to South Africa to be with our daughter . . . 

Through this terrible time, I was in close telephone contact with a Peace Corps 

counselor in Washington, D.C. When Gerry arrived, he was met and supported 

throughout by a Peace Corps medical officer . . . the Peace Corps was our advocate 

in every way possible. They treated us as though we were part of their own family.’’

While Volunteers may or may not have circumstances that necessitate the involvement of the Office of Special Services during their tenure, all Peace Corps Volunteers go through a readjustment process upon completion of their service as a 

Peace Corps Volunteer. For some, the transition back to life in the United States 

is a return to familiarity—the filling out of paperwork and taking care of any needed medical follow-up. For others, however, moving from two years of medical care 

by the Peace Corps, helping with everything from a toothache to a serious medical 

issue, can present a more significant challenge. 

The Post Service Unit in our Office of Medical Services facilitates post-service 

medical benefits to returned Peace Corps Volunteers with service-related medical 

conditions as their care is transferred to the U.S. Department of Labor. Volunteers 

are considered Federal employees for the purpose of health benefits provided 

through the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act (FECA) program administered 

by the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs at the Department of Labor. The 

FECA program provides post-service medical and compensation benefits for conditions exacerbated, accelerated, or precipitated by service in the Peace Corps. 

While Peace Corps staff remains vigilant in trying to ensure that claims on behalf 

of returned Peace Corps Volunteers are processed by the Department of Labor in 

a timely manner, this is an area where there is room for improvement. Progress in 

this area both reward former Volunteers that have already served their country and 

enhance the attractiveness of the Peace Corps Volunteer program to future Volunteers. As we strive to provide our Volunteers with the best service possible, we welcome positive steps—such as a post-service liaison—which would result in reducing 

delays experienced by former Volunteers as they seek resolution of their healthcare 

claims. 

Additionally, when a Volunteer completes his or her service, the Volunteer has 

the opportunity to purchase private health insurance through CorpsCare (a program 

similar to the COBRA health insurance plan). Peace Corps pays the first premium 

covering the first 31 days and then the individual can continue to purchase the policy for up to 18 months. The policy is designed to cover any medical issues not related to a Volunteer’s service. After identifying a gap during which many Volunteers 

who purchased CorpsCare were experiencing a lag time as they awaited a decision 

on their FECA claim, Peace Corps renegotiated the CorpsCare contract to provide 

former Volunteers with greater continuity of coverage. The new CorpsCare contract 

went into effect on March 1, 2004, and we are especially pleased with this new arrangement, which should be a great improvement in providing care for returned 

Peace Corps Volunteers. 

As we seek to further Peace Corps’ three goals, the Volunteer is always the central focus. We are continually striving to improve the agency and ensure that our 

Peace Corps Volunteers have meaningful, productive, and life-changing experiences 

as they serve throughout the world. Over 170,000 Americans have served in the 

Peace Corps, and we look forward to providing excellent care to the people of the 

United States who may serve, are serving, or have returned from service. The Peace 

Corps will not rest on our achievements and accomplishments. We will build on the 

successes and learn from events as they occur. Not long ago, I read a message from 

the parent of a volunteer who was grateful for the quality of care that was rendered 

by Peace Corps staff overseas and here in the United States. The parent wrote, ‘‘As 

a United States citizen, I am very proud of the Peace Corps; it is a superb organization worthy of every citizen’s support.’’

20

CONCLUSION

The safety of the Volunteer is the number one priority of the Peace Corps, and 

remains the primary focus of many of the research, planning, training, and compliance components of the agency. As noted above, our agency has accomplished a 

great deal over the past 22 months—in both safety and security and the growth of 

our programs. Our FY 2005 budget request of $401 million will support this continued growth and maintain the infrastructure we presently have in place. 

In conclusion, I am grateful to you and members of the Committee for your continued support of the Peace Corps mission. September 11th is a grim reminder that 

the work of past, present, and future Volunteers is more critical than ever. I believe 

that the Peace Corps is well positioned to safely achieve expansion and build upon 

the successes of the past 43 years.

Chairman HYDE. Thank you, Director Vasquez. If you do not remind retiring to the dugout, we will proceed with the second panel, 

and then we will entertain questions. 

Mr. VASQUEZ. Yes, sir. 

Chairman HYDE. I would like to welcome Mr. Walter Poirier of 

Lowell, Massachusetts. Mr. Poirier’s son, Walter J. Poirier, served 

as a Peace Corps Volunteer in Bolivia until his disappearance after 

January 2001. He is joined in the audience by Mrs. Sheila Poirier, 

and we thank both of you for joining us today. 

Next, Mr. Jeff Bruce is the Editor of the Dayton Daily News. Mr. 

Bruce holds a Bachelor’s Degree from St. Edwards University in 

Austin, Texas, and we thank you, Mr. Bruce. 

Mr. Jess Ford is Director for International Affairs and Trade at 

the General Accounting Office where he has worked since 1973. 

Mr. Ford has a Master’s Degree in International Relations from the 

Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, and we welcome you, Mr. 

Ford. 

Mr. Kevin Quigley holds degrees from Georgetown University, 

Columbia University, the University College of Dublin and 

Swarthmore College. Mr. Quigley served as a Peace Corps Volunteer in Thailand and is now the President of the National Peace 

Corps Association, a membership organization for 200,000 former 

Peace Corps staff and volunteers. We welcome you, Mr. Quigley. 

Mr. Charles Smith is an alumnus of Oberlin College, receiving an 

M.A. from Washington University and a J.D. from Boston University. He served as a Peace Corps Volunteer in Ethiopia and has 

served as Inspector General of the Peace Corps since 1998. Welcome, Mr. Smith. 

We are honored to have all of you appear before the Committee 

today, and if we would proceed with a 5-minute summary. Your full 

statement will be made a part of the record, and we will then be 

rejoined by Mr. Vasquez, Director Vasquez, and we will then ask 

questions of the witnesses. 

Thank you for being here. Mr. Poirier, 5 minutes if possible, and 

your full statement will be made a part of the record. 

STATEMENT OF WALTER R. POIRIER 

Mr. POIRIER. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Good morning, Committee Members. 

The Poirier family is extremely grateful for the ability to speak 

to this Committee regarding the disappearance of our son 3 years 

ago in Bolivia. In those 3 years, we have been through a gamut of 

emotions, and we hope no family will have to endure this again. 

21

To start, we believe that if we had not tried to contact our son 

on March 4, 2001, after not hearing from him for over a month, the 

Peace Corps would not have known he was missing for at least another week or 2. 

Lack of at least a weekly report mandate, coupled with an influx 

of new PCVs, the Bolivia 26, seemed to overburden the management of Bolivia Peace Corps. Trying to place too many volunteers 

in an effort to boost enrollment numbers while not having enough 

qualified management to deal with the situation caused the Peace 

Corps to lose contact with our son. 

We believe that our son actually disappeared sometime after 

January 31, 2001, as no one can confirm having seen him. No 

Peace Corps official can confirm seeing him after that week. Whatever happened to him, he was declared officially missing by the 

Peace Corps on March 6, 2001. 

When I spoke to the Bolivian country director I asked what safety protocols were in place for volunteers whose assignments were 

in remote areas such as my son and what provisions were made to 

enable them to communicate with Peace Corps Bolivia headquarters. She replied that there was a radio telephone within two 

or three kilometers of my son’s site on the Zong Valley. The radio 

telephone was actually several miles away. 

When asked why these young people had no cell phones, satellite 

phones or GPS devices, her response was we have been doing it 

this way for 40 years. This attitude that the Peace Corps has no 

need for change is a recurring theme in Peace Corps liturgy. 

We believe that the Peace Corps response was too little too late. 

There are numerous reasons. The aforementioned lack of oversight 

is one, but, more importantly, there was a prevailing attitude of acceptance within Peace Corps management that many volunteers 

take off from their assignments without leave. 

One of the reasons for the phenomena of going AWOL may be 

a lack of specific goals and work assignments and lack of proper 

experience of the volunteer to match the work assignment. This 

may result in a high rate of early separation. 

When young college graduates who have just devoted 4 long 

years in reaching a goal are placed in an environment where there 

is no tangible success to be achieved, boredom sets in. This would 

probably be the reason for the leaves. 

This current generation, my son included, have been raised with 

visual and tactile stimulation. They need positive feedback and reinforcement so that they feel what they are doing is having positive 

results. 

The push to increase the number of PCVs will only increase if 

the number of generalists decreases. We believe that the Bolivian 

Peace Corps management team felt that our son had taken one of 

those leaves as they only sent out his immediate supervisor to find 

him at first. 

We are not sure, but we believe that the Embassy and the Bolivian national police were not notified until several days after we 

alerted the Peace Corps. To compound the matter, the supervisor 

concocted a lie, stating that our son had a meeting with his counterpart in early March 2002 at La Paz government that he missed. 

This assistant country director said he lied to protect himself after 

22

being confronted by the FBI. We believe that the constant theme 

of protecting Peace Corps’ image was a factor. 

We believe that the lack of supervision, lack of meaningful assignment and lack of a proper place to live all contributed to the 

loss of our son. 

From the beginning, we have found Peace Corps to be more concerned with its image and protecting the aura and prestige of the 

Peace Corps than any other issue. In the first meeting with personnel from Peace Corps Washington on March 26, they stated that 

the search for my son had been reinvigorated. This is 20 days after 

he was first declared missing. 

Then the regional director, Ms. Minutillo, and a psychologist, Ms. 

Gutmann, raised questions about our son’s sense of responsibility 

and his work ethic. Our son had first been declared missing on 

March 6, and now we were being told the search was reinvigorated. 

The second visit came on April 6, 2001. At this time, Mr. Boswell, of the PC’s Inspector General’s Office, accompanied Mrs. 

Gutmann, along with a person who was to do a video for Bolivian 

TV. 

Mr. Boswell said he was the lead investigator for my son’s case 

and had just returned from Bolivia. He intimated that it was not 

uncommon for PC volunteers to form relationships with the locals 

in their host countries and hinted that they thought this may be 

my son’s case. That idea was also hinted at by the acting Peace 

Corps director at that time. 

On both occasions, there was a concern that we would say or do 

something that would impugn the Peace Corps’ image. This became 

more apparent each time we tried to bring national attention to 

Walter’s disappearance. The most glaring example occurred when 

we appeared on the Today Show in April 2001 as there was a press 

release already being circulated from Peace Corps as we were appearing. 

Further examples of this constant spin is the outraged response 

to the two reports done by the GAO, especially the one that focused 

on our son, which is GAO Report 01–970R dated July 20, 2001. Respectfully, Mr. Chairman, I request that this report be placed in 

the record. 

Chairman HYDE. Without objection. So ordered. 

[The information referred to follows:]

23


92743b.eps
24


92743c.eps
25


92743d.eps
26


92743e.eps
27


92743f.eps
28

Mr. POIRIER. We have also found that the Peace Corps can be obstructive. Simple requests for information were always met with 

the response that the Freedom of Information Act came into force 

for our requests and that we must follow procedure. 

Now, when we did submit for the information we wanted, we 

were met with denial of information and, in my perception, 

stonewalling. This practice seems to be consistently used to discover information which would damage the Peace Corps image 

from being obtained. Only after the Dayton Daily News sued to obtain the information and we had to sign off on it was it begrudgingly dispensed. 

We also find the Peace Corps to be insensitive. Two examples. 

On January 13, 2002, an invitation was sent to my home. This is 

a year, almost a year after my son disappeared. We were sent an 

invitation to celebrate Peace Corps Day by sharing our experiences 

about our Peace Corps Volunteer’s service and our thoughts. Needless to say, we declined. In other words, we were left on a mailing 

list despite all we had been through. 

The second incident occurred when we were sent a letter by the 

Peace Corps director informing us that Peace Corps was going to 

close out our son’s service. There is no resolution to his case. It is 

still an open case. Only after calls to Senator Kennedy, Kerry and 

our Representative Meehan did the director reverse his decision 

and agree to a 1-year extension with a review every year. 

So far, another year’s extension has been granted for this year 

extending our son’s service to February 2005. We feel that our son 

should be kept active until there is a final outcome, whatever that 

may be. 

We feel that he should be listed on the Wall of Remembrance at 

Peace Corps headquarters with a notation ‘‘Missing in Service’’ 

until such time as proof of his whereabouts and his status changes. 

We know that since 9/11 there has been little, if any, active 

searching for our son. Embassy personnel has turned over. The 

country director and assistants have left Peace Corps service. The 

FBI agent in charge has been reassigned. We suspect that our son’s 

disappearance is considered a cold case by the Bolivian national police, and it is sitting in a manilla folder tucked away. 

Twice we have asked for Peace Corps to hire a private investigator to really concentrate on our son’s case, and twice we have 

been rebuffed. 

In closing, we have been met at every turn with the attitude at 

Peace Corps that it does not need fixing as it is not broken, and 

our son is or was responsible for whatever happened to him. 

There is also an attitude that there should be no outside governmental oversight of Peace Corps other than within its own agency. 

The director has sent a letter to the Senate outlining the proposed 

changes and practices and protocols for volunteer safety. These 

changes are necessary and should be adopted immediately and financed immediately. 

However, in order to ensure that the change does not only take 

place on paper, the Poiriers feel that there should be an entity 

doing oversight which has no vested interest in Peace Corps. Only 

after the safety of each and every individual volunteer is properly 

addressed should there be an expansion of Peace Corps. If not, the 

29

incidents that that are reported in the daily news will increase perhaps exponentially as the number of volunteers increases. The robberies, rapes and murders will undoubtedly grow. 

We as a family do not wish the Peace Corps mission to be 

changed, but before any other volunteer is harmed due to lack of 

proper security measures and the availability of every possible 

communication device and the ceasing of assignment of solitary volunteers to remote areas are stopped, the problems will only get 

worse. 

Congress must be brave and bring about change. It must be done 

legislatively so that each succeeding Peace Corps director and assistant director will carry out the mandate to protect the volunteers first and foremost. 

The Peace Corps must realize that the world is not the same as 

it was 42 years ago, and change is necessary to protect its lifeblood, 

the volunteers, without whom there is no Peace Corps. 

Thank you. 

[The prepared statement of Mr. Poirier follows:]

PREPARED STATEMENT OF WALTER R. POIRIER

Dear Chairman Hyde and esteemed members, 

The Poirier family is extremely grateful for this opportunity to speak to this committee regarding our grueling experience involving the Peace Corps and the disappearance of our son, Walter J Poirier. In the three years since his vanishing without a trace, we have been through a gamut of emotions, which no family should 

have to endure. 

To start, we firmly believe that if we had not tried to contact our son on March 

4, 2001, after not hearing from him for over a month, the Peace Corps would not 

have known he was missing for another week or two. Lack of at least a weekly reporting mandate, coupled with an influx of new PCVs, Bolivia 26, which seemed to 

overburden the management for Bolivia Peace Corps, is to blame. Trying to place 

too many volunteers in an effort to boost enrollment numbers, while not having 

enough qualified management to deal with the situation, caused the Peace Corps 

to lose contact with our son. We believe that our son actually disappeared sometime 

after January 31, 2001, as no Peace Corps personnel can confirm seeing him after 

that week. Whatever happened to him, he was declared officially missing by the 

Peace Corps on March 6, 2001. When I spoke with the Country Director, I asked 

what safety protocols were in place for volunteers whose assignments were in remote areas such as my son and what provisions were made to enable them to communicate with Peace Corps Bolivia headquarters. She replied that there was a radio 

telephone within two or three kilometers of my son’s site. The radio telephone was 

actually several miles upriver. When asked why these young people had no cell 

phones, satellite phones, or GPS devices, her response was ‘‘we’ve been doing it this 

way for forty years’’. This attitude that the Peace Corps had no need for change is 

a recurring theme in Peace Corps liturgy. 

We believe that the Peace Corps response was too little too late. There are numerous reasons for this. The aforementioned lack of oversight is one, but more importantly, there is a prevailing attitude of acceptance within Peace Corps management 

that many volunteers take off from their assignments without leave. 

One of the reasons for this phenomenon of going AWOL, maybe a lack of specific 

goals in the work assignments, and lack of proper experience to match the work assignment. This may result in a high rate of early separation. When young college 

graduates, who have just devoted four long years in reaching a goal, are placed in 

an environment where there is little or no tangible success to be achieved, boredom 

sets in and this would seem to be the reason for the unauthorized leaves. This current generation has been raised on visual and tactile stimulation. They need positive feedback and reinforcement so that they feel what they are doing is having 

positive results. The push to increase the number of PCVs will only increase if the 

number of generalists decreases. We believe that the Bolivian Peace Corps management team felt that our son has taken one of those leaves, as they only sent his 

immediate supervisor to find him. We are not sure, but we believe that the embassy 

and the Bolivian National Police were not notified until several days after we alerted the Peace Corps. To compound the matter, the supervisor concocted a lie, stating 

30

that our son had a meeting with his counterpart in early March 2001, at the La 

Paz government house. This assistant country director said he lied to protect himself after being confronted by the FBI. That is probably true, but we also believe 

that the constant theme of protecting the Peace Corps’ image was a factor. We believe that the lack of supervision, lack of a meaningful assignment and lack of a 

proper place to live all contributed to the loss of our son. 

From the beginning, we have found the Peace Corps to be more concerned with 

its image and protecting the aura and prestige of the Peace Corps than any other 

issue. In the first meeting with PC personnel from Washington on March 26, 2001, they stated that the search for Walter, had been ‘‘reinvigorated’’, then the Regional 

Director, Ms. Minutillo, and a psychologist, Ms. Gutmann, raised questions about 

our son’s sense of responsibility and his work ethic. Our son had first been declared 

missing on March 6, 2001, and now we were being told that the search was reinvigorated? The second visit came on April 6, 2001, and this time Mr. Boswell, a member of PCs Inspector General’s office accompanied Ms. Gutmann, along with a person who was to do a video for Bolivian television. Mr. Boswell, who said he was the 

lead investigator for my son’s case and had just returned from Bolivia, intimated 

that it was not uncommon for PC volunteers to form relationships with the locals 

in their host countries, and hinted that they thought that this might be my son’s 

case. On both occasions, there was a concern that we would say or do something 

that would impugn the Peace Corps image. This became more apparent, each time 

we tried to bring national attention to Walter’s disappearance. The most glaring example occurred when we appeared on the Today Show in April 2001, there was a 

press release already being circulated as we were appearing. Further examples of 

this constant spin done by PR people within Peace Corps, is the outraged response 

to the two reports done by the GAO, especially the one which focused on our son 

which is GAO report #01–970R dated July 20, 2001. 

We have also found the Peace Corps to be obstructive. Simple requests for information were always met with the response that the FOIA act came into force for 

our requests and that we must follow procedure. Now when we did submit for the 

information we wanted, we were met with stonewalling and denial of information. 

This practice seems to be consistently used to stop discovery of information, which 

could damage the Peace Corps image, from being obtained. Only after the Dayton 

Daily News sued to obtain the information, was it begrudgingly dispensed. 

We also find the Peace Corps to be insensitive. Two examples: On January 13, 

2002, we were sent an invitation to celebrate Peace Corps Day by sharing our experiences about our Peace Corps volunteer’s service and our thoughts. In other words, 

we were left on a mailing list despite all we had been through. The second incident 

occurred when we were sent a letter by the Peace Corp Director, informing us that 

Peace Corps was going to close out our son’s service. As there was no resolution to 

his case, we were outraged that such a letter would be forthcoming. Only after calls 

to Senators Kennedy and Kerry, and Representative Meehan, did the Director reverse his decision and agree to a one year extension with a review every year. So 

far another year’s extension has been granted for this year extending our son’s service to February 2005. We feel that our son should be kept active until there is a 

final outcome, whatever that may be. We feel that he should be listed on the wall 

of remembrance at Peace Corps headquarters with the notation ‘‘missing in service’’ 

until such time as proof of his whereabouts and status changes. We know that since 

9/11 there has been little if any active searching for our son. Embassy personnel 

have turned over, the Country Director and Assistants have left Peace Corps service, and the FBI agent in charge has been reassigned. We suspect that our son’s 

disappearance is considered a cold case by the Bolivian National Police and tucked 

away in a manila folder gathering dust. Twice, we have asked for Peace Corps to 

hire a private investigator to really concentrate on our son’s case, and twice we have 

been rebuffed. 

In closing, we have been met at every turn with the attitude at Peace Corps that 

it doesn’t need fixing as it isn’t broken and that our son is/was responsible for whatever has happened to him. There is also an attitude that there should be no outside 

governmental oversight of Peace Corps, other than within its own Agency. The Director sent a letter to the Senate, outlining the Peace Corps proposed changes to 

the practices and protocols for volunteer safety. The changes are necessary and 

should be adopted immediately. However, in order to insure that the change doesn’t 

only take place on paper, the Poirier family feels that there should be an entity 

doing oversight which has no vested interest in Peace Corps. Only after the safety 

of each an every individual volunteer is property addressed should there be an expansion of Peace Corps. If not, then the incidents that were reported in the Dayton 

Daily News will increase, perhaps, exponentially, as the number of volunteers’ increases. The robberies, rapes, and murders, will undoubtedly grow. We as a family 

31

do not wish that the Peace Corps mission be changed, but before any other volunteer is harmed due to lack of proper security measures, availability of communication devices at all times, and assignment of solitary volunteers to remote area is 

stopped, the problems can only get worse. Congress must be brave and bring about 

change. It must be done legislatively so that each succeeding Peace Corps Director 

and Assistant Director will carry out the mandate to protect the volunteers, first 

and foremost. The Peace Corps must realize that the world is not the same place it 

was 42 years ago, and change is necessary to protect its life blood, the volunteers, 

without whom, there is no Peace Corps. 

If change is mandated through legislation, perhaps no other parent will have to 

appear before this body, after losing a precious son or daughter, due to lack of proper management security protocols and resistant attitudes toward change in the 

Peace Corps. 

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. This is the end of my prepared statement. I am now 

ready to answer any questions that your and any member of the committee may 

have.

Chairman HYDE. Thank you very much, Mr. Poirier. 

Mr. Bruce? 

STATEMENT OF JEFFREY BRUCE, EDITOR, ‘‘DAYTON DAILY 

NEWS’’

Mr. BRUCE. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, Members of the Committee. I have been asked here today to 

talk a little bit about the Dayton Daily News investigation of the 

Peace Corps and the safety risks faced by its volunteers. 

For 20 months, investigative reporter Russell Carollo and our 

Washington correspondent, Mei Ling Hopgood, examined the Peace 

Corps safety record. Our work included interviews with more than 

500 people in the United States and 10 other countries. We filed 

75 Freedom of Information Act requests and appeals, and ultimately we ended up suing the Peace Corps in Federal Court to obtain public records that document assaults against volunteers. That 

reporting resulted in a 7-day series that was published in 2003. 

Major findings of that series show that violence against volunteers is widespread. Since 1961, more than 250 Peace Corps Volunteers have died, including 20 who were murdered, others who perished under mysterious circumstances and one volunteer, as we 

have just heard, who has been missing since 2001. That represents 

a death rate of about one volunteer every 2 months. 

Since 1991, while the number of Peace Corps Volunteers has 

grown by less than 30 percent, the reported incidence of assaults 

against volunteers, and that includes a 112 percent increase in aggravated assaults, has more than doubled. In 2002, by way of example a Peace Corps Volunteer was assaulted or robbed every 23 

hours. In 1977, male volunteers outnumbered females by a ratio of 

two to one. Today, women comprise a majority of Peace Corps Volunteers, and they represent 70 percent of the assault victims. 

Volunteers frequently arrive at their sites fresh out of training 

and without a job to keep them busy. Some turn to drinking, using 

drugs, traveling to unsafe areas or engaging in other activities that 

put them in danger, our research showed. 

The extent of this safety problem has been disguised for decades, 

partly because the assaults occurred thousands of miles away, partly because the Peace Corps has made little effort to publicize them 

and partly because the agency deliberately kept people from finding out while emphasizing the positive aspects of Peace Corps service. 

32

The agency misled a number of families and the public about circumstances of several deaths. The details of that are in the written 

statement that I have provided. I must say also, though, in fairness, we also encountered a number of occasions where the Peace 

Corps was very helpful to families seeking information and was responsive to safety concerns. 

The Peace Corps did not start collecting worldwide crime statistics until 1990, 28 years after it first sent volunteers overseas, and 

the statistics it now makes available to the public and Congress 

make it appear volunteers are safer than they actually are. 

Though the Peace Corps calculates a crime rate based on the 

number of volunteers, it does not use the actual number of crime 

victims when calculating the rate; only the number of incidents. So, 

for example, when three women were raped in El Salvador in 1996, 

statistics from the Peace Corps database reflect a single rape incident. The agency still does not collect statistics on certain crimes, 

such as kidnappings and abductions, and murder is counted simply 

as an assault under the agency’s system. 

Too often, our reporters found, warnings about safety from Peace 

Corps safety officers have been ignored. In 1992, John Hale, then 

acting Inspector General for the Peace Corps, warned in a 43-page 

report to Congress of a marked increase in violent acts against volunteers worldwide. He told the Dayton Daily News that he quit the 

Peace Corps after working on the report in part because the agency 

ignored his warning. ‘‘The idea was to return . . . to the land of 

myth and legacy,’’ he said, ‘‘not to make sure this was a good and 

effective agency.’’

This panel may find it interesting that it was easier getting information out of the former Soviet Union than it was out of the 

Peace Corps. ‘‘Ukraine is a democratic country,’’ the regional police 

chief told us when supplying records of a volunteer’s murder, an incident that the Peace Corps had warned volunteers not to discuss 

with the media. ‘‘The press is free,’’ the Ukrainian police chief told 

us. ‘‘We have nothing to hide.’’

Compare that to the Peace Corps, which refused to even acknowledge some of our Freedom of Information Act requests, and 

when they did send records, and only after being sued, the agency 

removed the names of countries where assaults occurred, the dates 

assaults occurred, the names of country directors responsible for 

safety and other information that is routinely released by police departments here in the United States every day. 

Since the publication of the series, there has been a great deal 

of debate among former Peace Corps Volunteers. We reference that 

in our written remarks that I have given you. 

The Peace Corps has made changes. They now emphasize safety 

on their Web site, something that prior to publication of our series 

you would not have seen. That includes a video message from the 

director and, for the first time, the agency’s annual report on assault, a report that the U.S. General Accounting Office has been 

trying to get the agency to post for years. 

We note in our written report to you that there are also examples 

of Peace Corps Volunteers whose experience has been very, very 

meaningful in their lives. In fact, most of the 350 volunteers that 

we interviewed, including victims of assault, praised the Peace 

33

Corps and feel it is one of the most important experiences that they 

have had. 

Nonetheless, that is not necessarily representational of the statistics that show a rise in the increase of violence against volunteers. I will leave you with one quote from Jennifer Peterson, a volunteer who underwent 10 facial surgeries over 21⁄2 years after 

being beaten with a rock in the African country of Lesotho. 

She told the newspaper she felt abandoned by the Peace Corps. 

‘‘I thought the Peace Corps was different from a typical government 

entity,’’ she said. ‘‘I was expecting some support from them. I got 

nothing.’’

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. 

[The prepared statement of Mr. Bruce follows:]

PREPARED STATEMENT OF JEFFREY BRUCE, EDITOR, ‘‘DAYTON DAILY NEWS’’

Mr. Chairman, members of the committee, thank you for this opportunity to appear before you today. I’ve been asked to summarize the results of the Dayton Daily 

News investigation of the Peace Corps and the safety risks faced by its volunteers 

For 20 months, investigative reporter Russell Carollo and our Washington correspondent, Mei Ling Hopgood, examined the Peace Corps safety record. 

The reporters interviewed more than 500 people in the United States and 10 

other countries, filed 75 Freedom of Information Act requests and, ultimately, the 

newspaper sued the Peace Corps in federal court to obtain public records that document assaults against volunteers. 

The reporting resulted in a seven-day series of articles that ran between Oct. 26–

Nov. 1, 2003. Reprints of the series and related articles, including reaction from the 

Peace Corps and Peace Corps volunteers, were provided to this committee. 

I might also add, Mr. Chairman, that Mr. Carollo and Ms. Hopgood are in attendance at this hearing. 

Major findings from our investigation show that the Peace Corps puts volunteers 

in danger by sending them alone to some of the most dangerous corners of the 

world. 

Violence against volunteers is widespread. 

Since 1961, more than 250 Peace Corps volunteers have died—including at least 

20 who were murdered, others who perished under mysterious circumstances and 

one volunteer, Walter Poirier, who has been missing since 2001. 

That represents a death rate of about one volunteer every two months. 

Since 1991, while the number of Peace Corps volunteers has grown by less than 

30 percent, the reported incidents of assaults against volunteers—including rapes—

has more than doubled. 

In 2002, by way of example, a Peace Corps volunteer was assaulted or robbed 

every 23 hours. 

In 1977, male volunteers outnumbered females by a ratio of 2 to 1. Today, women 

comprise a majority of Peace Corps volunteers—and they represent 70 percent of the 

assault victims. 

The newspaper’s investigation showed that many assaults were linked to a decades-old practice of sending young volunteers just out of college to live alone with 

virtually no supervision in remote, often violent, regions, in unsafe housing. 

Volunteers frequently arrive at their sites fresh out of training without a job to 

keep them busy 

Some turn to drinking, using drugs, traveling to unsafe areas, or engaging in 

other activities that put them in danger. Alcohol was linked to nearly 1 in 6 deaths 

since 1962 and nearly 1 in 3 assaults since 1999, according to our research. 

The extent of this safety problem has been disguised for decades, partly because 

the assaults occurred thousands of miles away, partly because the Peace Corps has 

made little effort to publicize them and partly because the agency deliberately kept 

people from finding out—while emphasizing the positive aspects of Peace Corps 

Service. 

The agency misled a number of families and the public about the circumstances 

of several deaths; some families learned critical details about how their loved ones 

died for the first time from the newspaper. 

One mother didn’t know her daughter had attempted suicide in Ecuador before 

lapsing into a coma and dying. 

‘‘They just told me she had a massive stroke,’’ the mother said. 

34

The brother of another volunteer said the family was never told that his 22-yearold sister had written a resignation letter the day she disappeared in Africa or that 

the Peace Corps suspected suicide. Her body was found five days later floating in 

a river, and the family was led to believe a crocodile killed her. 

The family of a man who was murdered in Ukraine was unaware of the role a 

young Ukrainian woman played in his death. The woman stole the volunteer’s 

apartment keys, giving them to an acquaintance of the killer, and she is suspected 

to be the same woman who poisoned him the night he was killed. 

However, we did find cases where the agency was responsive to volunteers’ safety 

concerns and was helpful in providing information to families. Our observation was 

that the agency’s track record was erratic and inconsistent in this regard. 

The Peace Corps didn’t start collecting worldwide crime statistics until 1990, 28 

years after it first sent volunteers overseas, and the statistics it now makes available to the public and Congress make it appear volunteers are safer than they actually are. 

Though the Peace Corps calculates a crime rate based on the number of volunteers, it doesn’t use the actual number of crime victims when calculating the rate—

only the number of ‘‘incidents.’’

So, for example, when three women were raped in El Salvador in 1996, statistics 

reflect a single rape incident. 

The agency still doesn’t collect statistics on certain crimes, such as kidnappings 

and abductions. Murder is counted simply as an assault under the agency’s system. 

Too often, warnings about safety from Peace Corps safety officers have been ignored. 

In 1992, John Hale, then acting inspector general for the Peace Corps, warned 

in a 43-page report to Congress of ‘‘a marked increase in violent acts against volunteers worldwide.’’

Hale told the Dayton Daily News that he quit the Peace Corps after working on 

the report, in part, because the agency ignored his warnings. 

‘‘The idea was to return . . . to the land of myth and legacy,’’ he said, ‘‘not to 

make sure this was a good and effective agency that was doing good and keeping 

people safe. People don’t want to burst the myth of the culture.’’

You might find it interesting that it was easier getting information out of the 

former Soviet Union than out of Peace Corps. 

‘‘Ukraine is a democratic country,’’ the regional police chief told us when supplying records of a volunteer’s murder, an incident that the Peace Corps had warned 

volunteers not to discuss with the media. 

‘‘The press is free,’’ the Ukrainian police chief told us. ‘‘We have nothing to hide.’’

Compare that to the Peace Corps, which refused to even acknowledge some of our 

FOIA requests and when they did send records (and only after being sued), the 

agency removed the names of countries where assaults occurred, the dates assaults 

occurred, the names of country directors responsible for safety and other information routinely released by police departments here in the United States every day. 

The series has prompted vigorous debate among current and former volunteers 

and staff members. Much of that was prompted by the Peace Corps itself, which, 

even before we printed the first word was warning the national Peace Corps Association and its members that our reporting would be misleading. 

John Hale, the former Peace Corps IG, told us he was not surprised by that defensiveness: 

In dozens of investigations and audits, he said his staff was ‘‘often surprised at 

how little ‘peace’ there was in the corps when its virtue was questioned.’’

He warned us the reaction could turn fierce, ad hominem and visceral—his words. 

It has been. 

However, within weeks of publication of our series, the Peace Corps redesigned 

its web site to include extensive information on safety and security. 

The additional information includes a video message from the director and, for the 

first time, the agency’s annual report on assaults—a report the U.S. General Accounting Office had been trying to get the agency to post for two years. 

In fairness, it should be noted—as it was in our series—that most of the 350 volunteers we interviewed, including assault victims, looked favorably on their service 

saying it was a life-changing experience. 

George Stengren’s service in Africa inspired him to teach high school in Harlem. 

After teaching business skills in the African country of Togo, Tiffany Arthur of Dayton is an analyst in international agricultural trade. Melissa McSwegin of Kettering, 

who just finished three years as a volunteer, is working to eradicate the debilitating 

illness known as Guinea Worm disease in Niger. 

Other volunteers have gone on to public service, including Ohio Gov. Bob Taft and 

former U.S. Congressman Tony Hall of Dayton, who continues to champion the 

35

cause of hunger around the world as the ambassador to the United Nations’ food 

relief agencies. 

That acknowledged, the Peace Corps’ own statistics clearly show that volunteers 

are at increased risk. 

And the stories of volunteers who returned from service disillusioned—or who did 

not return at all—need to be heard. 

One of them is Jennifer Petersen, a volunteer who underwent 10 facial surgeries 

over two and a half years after being beaten with a rock in the African country of 

Lesotho: 

She said she felt abandoned by the Peace Corps. ‘‘I thought the Peace Corps was 

different from a typical government entity,’’ she said. ‘‘I was expecting some support 

from them. I got nothing.’’

Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

Chairman HYDE. Thank you, Mr. Bruce. 

Mr. Ford? 

STATEMENT OF JESS FORD, DIRECTOR, INTERNATIONAL 

AFFAIRS AND TRADE, U.S. GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE 

Mr. FORD. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, Members of the Committee. I am pleased to be here today to discuss GAO’s recent work 

on the Peace Corps. Most of my testimony is based on a major report we issued in July 2002, supplemented by some additional information we have been able to obtain from the Peace Corps to update our analysis. 

About 7,500 Peace Corps Volunteers currently serve in 70 countries around the world. The Administration intends to increase this 

number to about 14,000 over the next few years, and Congress has 

appropriated additional monies to the Peace Corps to support this 

expansion. 

Volunteers often live in areas with limited access to reliable communications, police or medical services. As Americans, they may be 

viewed as relatively wealthy and, hence, good targets for criminal 

activity. In many countries, female volunteers face special challenges. More than a third of female volunteers report experiencing 

sexual harassment on at least a monthly basis. 

My testimony today will summarize and update where possible 

key findings from our report related to trends in crime against volunteers and the agency’s system for generating information; the 

Peace Corps’ field implementation of its safety and security framework; the underlying factors that contribute to the Peace Corps’ 

performance in the field. I will also discuss Peace Corps actions 

that have been taken since our report was issued and attempt to 

show what actions they have taken. 

Peace Corps reported rates for most types of assaults have increased since the Peace Corps began collecting data in 1990. For 

example, the reported incident rate for major physical assaults 

nearly doubled from an average of about 9 per 1,000 volunteer 

years in 1991 to 1993 to an average of about 17 per 1,000 volunteers in 1998 to 2000. Our recent review of data for 2001 and 2002 

show that this rate has not changed. 

The full extent of crime against Peace Corps Volunteers is unknown because there is significant underreporting of crime by volunteers. We reported that Peace Corps had initiated efforts to encourage reporting and collecting additional data, but that there 

were other unrealized opportunities for additional examination of 

data. For example, our analysis showed that newer volunteers are 

36

more likely to become victims of crime than their more experienced 

colleagues. 

In response to our findings, in April 2003 the Peace Corps hired 

an analyst to enhance its capacity for gathering and analyzing 

crime data. The analyst focused on upgrading the crime data system and shifted responsibility for collecting data from the Medical 

Office to the newly created Safety and Security Office. According 

to the analyst, additional crime analyses have not yet been conducted as the focus has been on upgrading their collection and data 

reporting system. 

We reported that Peace Corps headquarters had developed a 

safety and security framework, but that the field’s implementation 

of the framework had produced varying results. While volunteers 

were generally satisfied with the agency’s training programs, there 

was mixed performance in key areas such as developing safe and 

secure housing sites, monitoring volunteers and planning for emergencies. 

For example, at each of the five posts we visited we found instances of volunteers who began their service in housing that had 

not been inspected and had not met Peace Corps guidelines. We 

also found variation in the frequency of staff contact with volunteers and in Peace Corps responsiveness to volunteer concerns 

about safety and security. 

To improve safety and security practices in the field, in 2002 the 

agency increased the number of field based safety and security officers charged with reviewing post practices and assisting them in 

making improvements. They also created a safety and security position at each post. 

The Peace Corps has hired a compliance officer to ensure that its 

rules are followed in the field. However, we recently reviewed some 

recent IG reports that indicate some safety and security shortcomings are continuing to occur in the field. 

We reported that a number of factors, including staff turnover, 

informal supervision and oversight mechanisms and unclear guidance have hampered the Peace Corps’ efforts to ensure high quality 

performance. For example, the Peace Corps reported that high staff 

turnover caused in part by the agency’s statutorily imposed 5-year 

rule has had a direct relationship to their ability to institutionalize 

best practices in the field, a situation that the agency staff are continually in the process of reinventing the wheel. 

We recommended that the Peace Corps address this issue. Congress has granted the Peace Corps authority to exempt safety and 

security staff from the 5-year rule, and the director has recently exempted 23 positions to carry out a more systematic way of addressing safety and security. 

To strengthen supervision and oversight, the Peace Corps created 

an Office of Safety and Security that centralizes safety and security 

functions under an associate director. The office is supported by a 

staff member in each of the three regional bureaus, a compliance 

officer, an analyst and nine field based security officers. All of these 

positions have been created since we did our work in July. 

In conclusion, Mr. Chairman, since we issued our report in July 

2002, the Peace Corps has taken several steps to improve the safety and security of its volunteers. However, Peace Corps is still in 

37

1 U.S. General Accounting Office, GAO–02–818, Peace Corps: Initiatives for Addressing Safety 

and Security Challenges Hold Promise, but Progress Should be Assessed (Washington, D.C.: July 

25, 2002). We reported separately on events surrounding one specific security incident—the disappearance of a volunteer in Bolivia in early 2001. See The Peace Corps Failed to Properly Supervise Missing Volunteer and Lost Track of Him, GAO–O1–970R (Washington, D.C.: July 20, 

2001). 2Most recent available data, from Peace Corps Volunteer Survey Global Report 2002, Peace 

Corps (August 2003). 3The Peace Corps crime data system records and tracks data by criminal ‘‘event’’ rather than 

by volunteer; those charged with filing reports are instructed to count events involving more 

than one volunteer only once. 4One volunteer year is equivalent to 1 full year of service by a volunteer or trainee. 

the process of implementing many of these actions, which are designed to improve the security environment that volunteers work 

under. 

This concludes my statement. 

[The prepared statement of Mr. Ford follows:]

PREPARED STATEMENT OF JESS FORD, DIRECTOR, INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS AND

TRADE, U.S. GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE

Mr. Chairman and Members of the Committee: 

I am pleased to be here to discuss Peace Corps’ efforts to ensure the safety and 

security of its volunteers. My testimony is based on our July 2002 report 1 and information we were able to obtain from the Peace Corps to update our analysis. 

About 7,500 Peace Corps volunteers currently serve in 70 ‘‘posts’’ (country missions) around the world. The administration intends to increase this number to 

about 14,000 over the next few years, and Congress has increased appropriations 

for the Peace Corps to support this expansion. Volunteers often live in areas with 

limited access to reliable communications, police, or medical services. As Americans, 

they may be viewed as relatively wealthy and, hence, good targets for criminal activity. In many countries, female volunteers face special challenges; more than a 

third of female volunteers report experiencing sexual harassment on at least a 

monthly basis.2

My testimony today will summarize and update, where possible, key findings from 

our 2002 report related to (1) trends in crime against volunteers and the agency’s 

system for generating such information, (2) the agency’s field implementation of its 

safety and security framework, and (3) the underlying factors that contributed to 

Peace Corps’ performance in the field. I will also discuss actions that Peace Corps 

has taken to improve the safety and security of its volunteers since we issued our 

report. 

We conducted fieldwork at Peace Corps’ headquarters and visited five countries 

with Peace Corps programs to prepare our report. To develop our analysis, we:

• analyzed Peace Corps’ crime data;

• reviewed agencywide safety and security policies, guidelines, training materials, volunteer satisfaction surveys, and Inspector General reports;

• interviewed key staff and more than 150 volunteers; and:

• examined practices for selecting volunteer sites, developing emergency action 

plans, and performing other tasks.

We conducted our work from July 2001 through May 2002 and from February 

2004 through March 2004, in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards. 

In summary, we found the following: 

Peace Corps’ reported incidence rates of crimes committed against volunteers have 

remained essentially unchanged since we last reported.3 Reported rates for most 

types of assaults have increased since Peace Corps began collecting data in 1990, 

but reported rates have stabilized in recent years. For example, the reported incidence rate for major physical assaults nearly doubled from an average of about 9 

per 1,000 volunteer years in 1991–1993 to an average of about 17 per 1,000 volunteer years4 in 1998–2000. Data for 2001 and 2002 show that this rate has not 

changed. The full extent of crime against Peace Corps volunteers is unknown because there is significant underreporting of crime by volunteers. We reported that 

Peace Corps had initiated efforts to encourage reporting and collect additional data 

but that there were also other unrealized opportunities for additional examination 

of data. For example, our analysis showed that newer volunteers may be more likely 

38

5See U.S.C. 2506(a)(5), (6) and Public Law 108–7, the Consolidated Appropriations Act for 

Fiscal Year 2003, as well as Public Law 108–199, the Consolidated Appropriations Act for Fiscal 

Year 2004. 

to become victims of crime than their more experienced colleagues. In response to 

our findings, in April 2003, Peace Corps hired an analyst to enhance its capacity 

for gathering and analyzing crime data. The analyst has focused on upgrading the 

crime data system and shifting the responsibility for data collection and analysis 

from the medical office to the newly created safety and security office, to place the 

responsibility for crime data in an office dedicated to safety and security. According 

to the analyst, additional crime analyses have not yet been conducted, as the focus 

has been on upgrading the process for collecting and reporting data. 

We reported that Peace Corps’ headquarters had developed a safety and security 

framework but that the field’s implementation of the framework had produced varying results. While volunteers were generally satisfied with the agency’s training programs, there was mixed performance in key elements of the framework such as in 

developing safe and secure housing sites, monitoring volunteers, and planning for 

emergencies. For example, at each of the five posts we visited, we found instances 

of volunteers who began their service in housing that had not been inspected and 

had not met Peace Corps’ guidelines. We also found that the frequency of staff contact with volunteers and the quality and comprehensiveness of emergency action 

plans varied. Recent tests of the emergency action plans indicate that the agency 

has made improvements in the length of time needed to contact volunteers. To improve safety and security practices in the field, in 2002, the agency increased the 

number of field-based safety and security officers charged with reviewing post practices and assisting them in making improvements, and created a safety and security 

position at each post. Peace Corps hired a compliance officer charged with independently assessing each post’s compliance with the framework. However, recent Inspector General reports indicate that safety and security shortcomings in the field are 

still occurring. 

We reported that a number of factors, including staff turnover, informal supervision and oversight mechanisms, and unclear guidance hampered Peace Corps’ efforts to ensure high-quality performance for the agency as a whole. For example, 

Peace Corps reported that high staff turnover, caused in part by the agency’s statutorily imposed 5-year limit on employment for U.S. direct hire staff, had resulted 

in a lack of institutional memory, producing a situation in which agency staff are 

continually ‘‘reinventing the wheel.’’ We made a recommendation that Peace Corps 

develop a strategy to address staff turnover, including an assessment of the ‘‘5-year 

rule’’—a statutory restriction on the tenure of U.S. direct hire employees.5 In response to our recommendation on staff turnover and the difficulties it created, Peace 

Corps was granted authority to exempt safety and security staff from the 5-year 

rule. The agency has exempted 23 staff positions from the 5-year rule and plans to 

conduct a study to determine whether there are additional positions that should be 

exempted. To strengthen supervision and oversight, Peace Corps created an office 

of safety and security that centralizes safety and security functions under an associate directorship. The office is supported by a staff member in each of the three 

regional bureaus, a compliance officer, an analyst, and nine field-based security officers. We also recommended that Peace Corps develop performance indicators and 

report on its safety and security initiatives. The agency is still clarifying its guidance on how to apply its revised framework, revising its indicators of progress, and 

establishing a base line for judging performance in all areas of safety and security. 

In conclusion, since we issued our report in July 2002, it is clear that the agency 

has taken a number of steps designed to improve the safety and security of its volunteers. However, Peace Corps is still in the process of implementing many of these 

actions and their full effect has yet to be demonstrated. 

BACKGROUND: 

Created in 1961, Peace Corps is mandated by statute to help meet developing 

countries’ needs for trained manpower while promoting mutual understanding between Americans and other peoples. Volunteers commit to 2-year assignments in 

host communities, where they work on projects such as teaching English, strengthening farmer cooperatives, or building sanitation systems. By developing relationships with members of the communities in which they live and work, volunteers 

contribute to greater intercultural understanding between Americans and host country nationals. Volunteers are expected to maintain a standard of living similar to 

that of their host community colleagues and co-workers. They are provided with stipends that are based on local living costs and housing similar to their hosts. VolunVerDate Mar 21 2002 10:27 Jul 13, 2004 Jkt 092188 PO 00000 Frm 00042 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6621 F:\WORK\FULL\032404\92743.000 HINTREL1 PsN: SHIRL
39

6 Crime data are available through 2002. Based on our the assessment of crime data that we 

performed in preparing our 2002 report and subsequent discussions with agency officials, we 

concluded that the data we obtained to update the rates and trends in crime against volunteers 

were sufficiently reliable for purposes of this statement. 

teers are not supplied with vehicles. Although the Peace Corps accepts older volunteers and has made a conscious effort to recruit minorities, the current volunteer 

population has a median age of 25 years and is 85 percent white. More than 60 percent of the volunteers are women. 

Volunteer health, safety, and security is Peace Corps’ highest priority, according 

to the agency. To address this commitment, the agency has adopted policies for 

monitoring and disseminating information on the security environments in which 

the agency operates, training volunteers, developing safe and secure volunteer housing and work sites, monitoring volunteers, and planning for emergencies such as 

evacuations. Headquarters is responsible for providing guidance, supervision, and 

oversight to ensure that agency policies are implemented effectively. Peace Corps relies heavily on country directors—the heads of agency posts in foreign capitals—to 

develop and implement practices that are appropriate for specific countries. Country 

directors, in turn, rely on program managers to develop and oversee volunteer programs. Volunteers are expected to follow agency policies and exercise some responsibility for their own safety and security. Peace Corps emphasizes community acceptance as the key to maintaining volunteer safety and security. The agency has found 

that volunteer safety is best ensured when volunteers are well integrated into their 

host communities and treated as extended family and contributors to development. 

REPORTED CRIME INCIDENTS HAVE INCREASED, BUT FULL EXTENT OF CRIME AGAINST

VOLUNTEERS REMAINS UNKNOWN: 

Reported incidence rates of crime against volunteers have remained essentially 

unchanged since we completed our report in 2002.6 Reported incidence rates for 

most types of assaults have increased since Peace Corps began collecting data in 

1990, but have stabilized in recent years. The reported incidence rate for major 

physical assaults has nearly doubled, averaging about 9 assaults per 1,000 volunteer years in 1991–1993 and averaging about 17 assaults in 1998–2000. Reported 

incidence rates for major assaults remained unchanged over the next 2 years. Reported incidence rates of major sexual assaults have decreased slightly, averaging 

about 10 per 1,000 female volunteer years in 1991–1993 and about 8 per 1,000 female volunteer years in 1998–2000. Reported incidence rates for major sexual assaults averaged about 9 per 1,000 female volunteer years in 2001–2002. 

Peace Corps’ system for gathering and analyzing data on crime against volunteers 

has produced useful insights, but we reported in 2002 that steps could be taken to 

enhance the system. Peace Corps officials agreed that reported increases are difficult to interpret; the data could reflect actual increases in assaults, better efforts 

to ensure that agency staff report all assaults, and/or an increased willingness 

among volunteers to report incidents. The full extent of crime against volunteers, 

however, is unknown because of significant underreporting. Through its volunteer 

satisfaction surveys, Peace Corps is aware that a significant number of volunteers 

do not report incidents, thus reducing the agency’s ability to state crime rates with 

certainty. For example, according to the agency’s 1998 survey, volunteers did not 

report 60 percent of rapes and 20 percent of nonrape sexual assaults. Reasons cited 

for not reporting include embarrassment, fear of repercussions, confidentiality concerns, and a belief that Peace Corps could not help. 

In 2002, we observed that opportunities for additional analyses existed that could 

help Peace Corps develop better-informed intervention and prevention strategies. 

For example, our analysis showed that about a third of reported assaults after 1993 

occurred from the fourth to the eighth month of service—shortly after volunteers 

completed training, arrived at sites, and began their jobs. We observed that this 

finding could be explored further and used to develop additional training. 

Efforts to Improve Data Collection and Analysis Are in Process: 

Since we issued our report, Peace Corps has taken steps to strengthen its efforts 

for gathering and analyzing crime data. The agency has hired an analyst responsible for maintaining the agency’s crime data collection system, analyzing the information collected, and publishing the results for the purpose of influencing volunteer 

safety and security policies. Since joining the agency a year ago, the analyst has focused on redesigning the agency’s incident reporting form to provide better information on victims, assailants, and incidents and preparing a new data management 

system that will ease access to and analysis of crime information. However, these 

new systems have not yet been put into operation. The analyst stated that the reVerDate Mar 21 2002 10:27 Jul 13, 2004 Jkt 092188 PO 00000 Frm 00043 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6621 F:\WORK\FULL\032404\92743.000 HINTREL1 PsN: SHIRL
40

porting protocol and data management system are to be introduced this summer, 

and responsibility for crime data collection and analysis will be transferred from the 

medical office to the safety and security office. According to the analyst, she has not 

yet performed any new data analyses because her focus to date has been on upgrading the system. 

SAFETY AND SECURITY FRAMEWORK UNEVENLY IMPLEMENTED IN THE FIELD: 

We reported that Peace Corps’ headquarters had developed a safety and security 

framework but that the field’s implementation of this framework was uneven. The 

agency has taken steps to improve the field’s compliance with the framework, but 

recent Inspector General reports indicate that this has not been uniformly achieved. 

We previously reported that volunteers were generally satisfied with the agency’s 

training programs. However, some volunteers had housing that did not meet the 

agency’s standards, there was great variation in the frequency of staff contact with 

volunteers, and posts had emergency action plans with shortcomings. To increase 

the field’s compliance with the framework, in 2002, the agency hired a compliance 

officer at headquarters, increased the number of field-based safety and security officer positions, and created a safety and security position at each post. However, recent Inspector General reports continued to find significant shortcomings at some 

posts, including difficulties in developing safe and secure sites and preparing adequate emergency action plans. 

Volunteers Are Generally Satisfied with Training: 

In 2002, we found that volunteers were generally satisfied with the safety training that the agency provided, but we found a number of instances of uneven performance in developing safe and secure housing. Posts have considerable latitude in 

the design of their safety training programs, but all provide volunteers with 3 

months of preservice training that includes information on safety and security. Posts 

also provide periodic in-service training sessions that cover technical issues. Many 

of the volunteers we interviewed said that the safety training they received before 

they began service was useful and cited testimonials by current volunteers as one 

of the more valuable instructional methods. In both the 1998 and 1999 volunteer 

satisfaction surveys, over 90 percent of volunteers rated safety and security training 

as adequate or better; only about 5 percent said that the training was not effective. 

Some regional safety and security officer reports have found that improvements 

were needed in post training practices. The Inspector General has reported that volunteers at some posts said cross-cultural training and presentations by the U.S. embassy’s security officer did not prepare them adequately for safety-related challenges 

they faced during service. Some volunteers stated that Peace Corps did not fully 

prepare them for the racial and sexual harassment they experienced during their 

service. Some female volunteers at posts we visited stated that they would like to 

receive self-protection training. 

Mixed Performance in Housing, Monitoring Volunteers, and Emergency Action Plans: 

Peace Corps’ policies call for posts to ensure that housing is inspected and meets 

post safety and security criteria before the volunteers arrive to take up residence. 

Nonetheless, at each of the five posts we visited, we found instances of volunteers 

who began their service in housing that had not been inspected and had various 

shortcomings. For example, one volunteer spent her first 3 weeks at her site living 

in her counterpart’s office. She later found her own house; however, post staff had 

not inspected this house, even though she had lived in it for several months. Poorly 

defined work assignments and unsupportive counterparts may also increase volunteers’ risk by limiting their ability to build a support network in their host communities. At the posts we visited, we met volunteers whose counterparts had no plans 

for the volunteers when they arrived at their sites, and only after several months 

and much frustration did the volunteers find productive activities. 

We found variations in the frequency of staff contact with volunteers, although 

many of the volunteers at the posts we visited said they were satisfied with the frequency of staff visits to their sites, and a 1998 volunteer satisfaction survey reported that about two-thirds of volunteers said the frequency of visits was adequate 

or better. However, volunteers had mixed views about Peace Corps’ responsiveness 

to safety and security concerns and criminal incidents. The few volunteers we spoke 

with who said they were victims of assault expressed satisfaction with staff response 

when they reported the incidents. However, at four of the five posts we visited, some 

volunteers described instances in which staff were unsupportive when the volunteers reported safety concerns. For example, one volunteer said she informed Peace 

Corps several times that she needed a new housing arrangement because her doorVerDate Mar 21 2002 10:27 Jul 13, 2004 Jkt 092188 PO 00000 Frm 00044 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6621 F:\WORK\FULL\032404\92743.000 HINTREL1 PsN: SHIRL
41

man repeatedly locked her in or out of her dormitory. The volunteer said staff were 

unresponsive, and she had to find new housing without the Peace Corps’ assistance. 

In 2002, we reported that, while all posts had tested their emergency action plan, 

many of the plans had shortcomings, and tests of the plans varied in quality and 

comprehensiveness. Posts must be well prepared in case an evacuation becomes necessary. In fact, evacuating volunteers from posts is not an uncommon event. In the 

last two years Peace Corps has conducted six country evacuations involving nearly 

600 volunteers. We also reported that many posts did not include all expected elements of a plan, such as maps demarcating volunteer assembly points and alternate 

transportation plans. In fact, none of the plans contained all of the dimensions listed 

in the agency’s Emergency Action Plan checklist, and many lacked key information. 

In addition, we found that in 2002 Peace Corps had not defined the criteria for a 

successful test of a post plan. 

Actions Taken to Improve Field Compliance, but Implementation Still Uneven: 

Peace Corps has initiated a number of efforts to improve the field’s implementation of its safety and security framework, but Inspector General reports continued 

to find significant shortcomings at some posts. However, there has been improvement in post communications with volunteers during emergency action plan tests. 

We reviewed 10 Inspector General reports conducted during 2002 and 2003. Some 

of these reports were generally positive—one congratulated a post for operating an 

‘‘excellent’’ program and maintaining high volunteer morale. However, a variety of 

weaknesses were also identified. For example, the Inspector General found multiple 

safety and security weaknesses at one post, including incoherent project plans and 

a failure to regularly monitor volunteer housing. The Inspector General also reported that several posts employed inadequate site development procedures; some 

volunteers did not have meaningful work assignments, and their counterparts were 

not prepared for their arrival at site. In response to a recommendation from a prior 

Inspector General report, one post had prepared a plan to provide staff with rape 

response training and identify a local lawyer to advise the post of legal procedures 

in case a volunteer was raped. However, the post had not implemented these plans 

and was unprepared when a rape actually occurred. 

Our review of recent Inspector General reports identified emergency action planning weaknesses at some posts. For example, the Inspector General found that at 

one post over half of first year volunteers did not know the location of their emergency assembly points. However, we analyzed the results of the most recent tests 

of post emergency action plans and found improvement since our last report. About 

40 percent of posts reported contacting almost all volunteers within 24 hours, compared with 33 percent in 2001. Also, our analysis showed improvement in the quality of information forwarded to headquarters. Less than 10 percent of the emergency 

action plans did not contain information on the time it took to contact volunteers, 

compared with 40 percent in 2001. 

UNDERLYING FACTORS CONTRIBUTED TO UNEVEN FIELD IMPLEMENTATION, BUT AGENCY

HAS TAKEN STEPS TO IMPROVE PERFORMANCE: 

In our 2002 report, we identified a number of factors that hampered Peace Corps 

efforts to ensure that this framework produced high-quality performance for the 

agency as a whole. These included high staff turnover, uneven application of supervision and oversight mechanisms, and unclear guidance. We also noted that Peace 

Corps had identified a number of initiatives that could, if effectively implemented, 

help to address these factors. The agency has made some progress but has not completed implementation of these initiatives. 

High staff turnover hindered high quality performance for the agency. According 

to a June 2001 Peace Corps workforce analysis, turnover among U.S. direct hires 

was extremely high, ranging from 25 percent to 37 percent in recent years. This report found that the average tenure of these employees was 2 years, that the agency 

spent an inordinate amount of time selecting and orienting new employees, and that 

frequent turnover produced a situation in which agency staff are continually ‘‘reinventing the wheel.’’ Much of the problem was attributed to the 5-year employment 

rule, which statutorily restricts the tenure of U.S. direct hires, including regional 

directors, country desk officers, country directors and assistant country directors, 

and Inspector General and safety and security staff. Several Peace Corps officials 

stated that turnover affected the agency’s ability to maintain continuity in oversight 

of post operations. 

In 2002, we also found that informal supervisory mechanisms and a limited number of staff hampered Peace Corps efforts to ensure even application of supervision 

and oversight. The agency had some formal mechanisms for documenting and assessing post practices, including the annual evaluation and testing of post emerVerDate Mar 21 2002 10:27 Jul 13, 2004 Jkt 092188 PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6621 F:\WORK\FULL\032404\92743.000 HINTREL1 PsN: SHIRL
42

gency action plans and regional safety and security officer reports on post practices. 

Nonetheless, regional directors and country directors relied primarily on informal 

supervisory mechanisms, such as staff meetings, conversations with volunteers, and 

e-mail to ensure that staff were doing an adequate job of implementing the safety 

and security framework. One country director observed that it was difficult to oversee program managers’ site development or monitoring activities because the post 

did not have a formal system for performing these tasks. We also reported that 

Peace Corps’ capacity to monitor and provide feedback to posts on their safety and 

security performance was limited by the small number of staff available to perform 

relevant tasks. We noted that the agency had hired three field-based security and 

safety specialists to examine and help improve post practices, and that the Inspector 

General also played an important role in helping posts implement the agency’s safety and security framework. However, we reported that between October 2000 and 

May 2002 the safety and security specialists had been able to provide input to only 

about one-third of Peace Corps’ posts while the Inspector General had issued findings on safety and security practices at only 12 posts over 2 years. In addition, we 

noted that Peace Corps had no system for tracking post compliance with Inspector 

General recommendations. 

We reported that the agency’s guidance was not always clear. The agency’s safety 

and security framework outlines requirements that posts are expected to comply 

with but did not often specify required activities, documentation, or criteria for judging actual practices—making it difficult for staff to understand what was expected 

of them. Many posts had not developed clear reporting and response procedures for 

incidents such as responding to sexual harassment. The agency’s coordinator for volunteer safety and security stated that unclear procedures made it difficult for senior 

staff, including regional directors, to establish a basis for judging the quality of post 

practices. The coordinator also observed that, at some posts, field-based safety and 

security officers had found that staff members did not understand what had to be 

done to ensure compliance with agency policies. 

Peace Corps Taking Steps to Address These Factors: 

The agency has taken steps to reduce staff turnover, improve supervision and 

oversight mechanisms, and clarify its guidance. In February 2003, Congress passed 

a law to allow U.S. direct hires whose assignments involve the safety of Peace Corps 

volunteers to serve for more than 5 years. The Peace Corps Director has employed 

his authority under this law to designate 23 positions as exempt from the 5-year 

rule. These positions include nine field-based safety and security officers, the three 

regional safety and security desk officers working at agency headquarters, as well 

as the crime data analyst and other staff in the headquarters office of safety and 

security. They do not include the associate director for safety and security, the compliance officer, or staff from the office of the Inspector General. Peace Corps officials 

stated that they are about to hire a consultant who will conduct a study to provide 

recommendations about adding additional positions to the current list. 

To strengthen supervision and oversight, Peace Corps has increased the number 

of staff tasked with safety and security responsibilities and created the office of safety and security that centralizes all security-related activities under the direction of 

a newly created associate directorate for safety and security. The agency’s new 

crime data analyst is a part of this directorate. In addition, Peace Corps has:

• appointed six additional field-based safety and security officers, bringing the 

number of such individuals on duty to nine (with three more positions to be 

added by the end of 2004);

• authorized each post to appoint a safety and security coordinator to provide 

a point of contact for the field-based safety and security officers and to assist 

country directors in ensuring their post’s compliance with agency policies, including policies pertaining to monitoring volunteers and responding to their 

safety and security concerns (all but one post have filled this position);

• appointed safety and security desk officers in each of Peace Corps’ three regional directorates in Washington, D.C., to monitor post compliance in conjunction with each region’s country desk officers; and:

• appointed a compliance officer, reporting to the Peace Corps Director, to independently examine post practices and to follow up on Inspector General recommendations on safety and security.

In response to our recommendation that Peace Corps’ Director develop indicators 

to assess the effectiveness of the new initiatives and include these in the agency’s 

annual Government Performance and Results Act reports, Peace Corps has exVerDate Mar 21 2002 10:27 Jul 13, 2004 Jkt 092188 PO 00000 Frm 00046 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6621 F:\WORK\FULL\032404\92743.000 HINTREL1 PsN: SHIRL
43

panded its reports to include 10 quantifiable indicators of safety and security performance. 

To clarify agency guidance, Peace Corps has:

• created a ‘‘compliance tool’’ or checklist that provides a fairly detailed and explicit framework for headquarters staff to employ in monitoring post efforts 

to put Peace Corps’ safety and security guidance into practice in their countries,

• strengthened guidance on volunteer site selection and development,

• developed standard operating procedures for post emergency action plans, 

and:

• concluded a protocol clarifying that the Inspector General’s staff has responsibility for coordinating the agency’s response to crimes against volunteers.

These efforts have enhanced Peace Corps’ ability to improve safety and security 

practices in the field. The threefold expansion in the field-based safety and security 

officer staff has increased the agency’s capacity to support posts in developing and 

applying effective safety and security policies. Regional safety and security officers 

at headquarters and the agency’s compliance officer monitor the quality of post practices. All posts were required to certify that they were in compliance with agency 

expectations by the end of June 2003. Since that time, a quarterly reporting system 

has gone into effect wherein posts communicate with regional headquarters regarding the status of their safety and security systems and practices. 

The country desks and the regional safety and security officers, along with the 

compliance officer, have been reviewing the emergency action plans of the posts and 

providing them with feedback and suggestions for improvement. The compliance officer has created and is applying a matrix to track post performance in addressing 

issues deriving from a variety of sources, including application of the agency’s safety 

and security compliance tool and Inspector General reports. The compliance officer 

and staff from one regional office described their efforts, along with field-based safety and security staff and program experts from headquarters, to ensure an adequate 

response from one post where the Inspector General had found multiple safety and 

security weaknesses. 

However, efforts to put the new system in place are incomplete. As already noted, 

the agency has developed, but not yet introduced, an improved system for collecting 

and analyzing crime data. The new associate director of safety and security observes 

that the agency’s field-based safety and security officers come from diverse backgrounds and that some have been in their positions for only a few months. All have 

received training via the State Department’s bureau of diplomatic security. However, they are still employing different approaches to their work. Peace Corps is preparing guidance for these officers that would provide them with a uniform approach 

to conducting their work and reporting the results of their analyses, but the guidance is still in draft form. The Compliance Officer has completed detailed guidance 

for crafting emergency action plans, but this guidance was distributed to the field 

only at the beginning of this month. Moreover, following up on our 2002 recommendation, the agency’s Deputy Director is heading up an initiative to revise and 

strengthen the indicators that the agency uses to judge the quality of all aspects 

of its operations, including ensuring volunteer safety and security, under the Government Performance and Results Act. 

Mr. Chairman, this concludes my prepared statement. I would be happy to respond to any questions you or other Members of the Committee may have at this 

time.

Chairman HYDE. Thank you, Mr. Ford. 

Mr. Quigley? 

STATEMENT OF KEVIN F.F. QUIGLEY, PRESIDENT, NATIONAL 

PEACE CORPS ASSOCIATION 

Mr. QUIGLEY. Good morning, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Chairman and 

Members of the Committee, my name is Kevin Quigley, and I am 

the President of the National Peace Corps Association, the only national organization for Peace Corps Volunteers, staff, family and 

friends. 

I appreciate the opportunity to appear before the Committee to 

provide a volunteer’s perspective on the important issue of safety 

44

and security of Peace Corps Volunteers. My comments this morning 

are informed by literally conversations with more than 1,000 volunteers in small and large groups over the past 7 months. 

In briefly presenting a volunteer’s perspective, I will make three 

main points. Some of the discussion does not provide adequate context to gauge the severity of the problem. Two, a number of the 

proposals could jeopardize what makes Peace Corps a singular success. Three, in devising a response, it is important that any legislation provide for additional funding so that the goal of doubling 

Peace Corps can be met. 

Among the community of those who have served, there is broad, 

deep and passionate support for Peace Corps. This community understands the vital importance of having volunteers working overseas to promote peace through training individuals in their host 

country, educating them about the United States and, upon their 

return, educating Americans about the countries in which they 

served. 

Support for the Peace Corps mission continues despite the growing awareness of concerns about our country’s security and the 

safety and security of volunteers. I would like to provide some perspective on this important issue by describing my own experience. 

I became a volunteer in 1976 and served for 3 years. My group 

arrived in Thailand a month after the last United States soldiers 

stationed there during the Vietnam War departed. Like many volunteers who had gone before and after me, I knew there was some 

risk related with my assignment since it was in one of the most 

isolated and poor parts of the country. 

Although there was considerable ongoing fighting in Dan Sai district where I was posted, I never felt threatened or in danger. This 

was due to the fact that I was included in and identified as part 

of the community. It seemed that all of the people in that district 

understood who I was and that I was teaching their children. 

The very nature of my assignment in a remote area far from 

where tourists traveled or where there were scant Americans made 

a deep impression on the people I worked with and lived with. This 

encouraged them to see Peace Corps and the government that supported it in profound and important new ways. 

If I had not been placed in such a remote area, for which I was 

well prepared, and I discuss in my written statement some of the 

preparation for that, I would not have been able to contribute or 

learn anywhere near as much as I did. I have heard from hundreds 

of other volunteers who had comparable kinds of postings in remote 

or sensitive areas, and they share my assessment. 

In the aftermath of the tragic events of September 2001, following the 2002 GAO report and in a lead up and in the aftermath 

of the series published by the Dayton Daily News, there has been 

a lively discussion in the Peace Corps community about safety and 

security issues. 

Within this community, there is a broad spectrum of opinion. 

However, among those of us who have served we agree that safety 

and security of volunteers must be of paramount concern. All our 

members grieve for the 252 volunteers who have lost their lives in 

service and have enormous sympathy for our fellow volunteers who 

have experienced harm. Whenever a tragedy occurs or whenever a 

45

volunteer is harmed, we expect and in fact demand that Peace 

Corps do everything humanly possibly to be responsive. 

There is also a sense that the discussion on safety and security 

misses the broader context of whether the Peace Corps experience 

is, relatively speaking, any more risky in terms of homicides and 

assaults than life of a comparable cohort in urban America, overseas development workers or volunteers with Peace Corps’ counterparts in Germany, Great Britain, France or Japan. 

In fact, one of the most eloquent testimonies to the importance 

of Peace Corps service is provided by the Radley family. I mention 

this because Gordon Radley, a volunteer Malawi, was not able to 

be here today. Gordon’s older brother, Larry, along with another 

volunteer, David Crozier, were the first two volunteers who died in 

service. After graduating from college, Larry’s sister, Elana, and 

his brother, Gordon, both joined the Peace Corps, knowing full well 

the risks associated with service. 

There have been proposals to post at least two volunteers to each 

site or consolidate groups of volunteers. In my view, that would diminish the experience and lessen the impact of Peace Corps without necessarily enhancing the safety and security of volunteers. 

Two volunteers posted together tend to be less well integrated 

and perhaps less well accepted by the local community. Two volunteers are more likely to be perceived as able to look after each 

other, thus diminishing the community’s need to have a stake in 

their safety and security. 

Mr. Chairman, I understand that the Committee is considering 

legislation to address the issue of volunteer safety and security. 

Speaking simply as someone who has served, I would say changing 

the status of the Inspector General is unlikely to have any effect 

on volunteers’ safety and security. 

Creating an Office of Ombudsman would be perceived by the 

Peace Corps community as being responsive to many former volunteers, especially those who have been harmed or become ill during 

their service and not received promised post service support. Establishing statutorily the Office of Safety and Security would be a way 

to underscore the Congress’ concern with a commitment to ensure 

the safety and security of volunteers. 

Chairman Hyde and Ranking Member Lantos and Members of 

the Committee, the Peace Corps community thanks you for addressing the issues of volunteer safety and security. The National 

Peace Corps Association will work with you and the Committee to 

ensure that these issues are addressed in a way that protects volunteers, preserves the essence of Peace Corps and best advances 

U.S. interest. 

Thank you. 

[The prepared statement of Mr. Quigley follows:]

PREPARED STATEMENT OF KEVIN F.F. QUIGLEY, PRESIDENT, NATIONAL PEACE CORPS

ASSOCIATION

Chairman Hyde and Ranking Democratic Member Lantos, my name is Kevin F. 

F. Quigley, President of the National Peace Corps Association. I appreciate the opportunity to appear before the Committee to provide a volunteer’s perspective on the 

important issue of the safety and security of Peace Corps Volunteers. 

The National Peace Corps Association (NPCA) is a 501(c)(3) organization, founded 

25 years ago in 1979 as the National Council of Returned Peace Corps Volunteers. 

The NPCA is the only national organization for Peace Corps volunteers, staff, family 

46

and friends whose lives have been influenced by the Peace Corps experience. Our 

mission is to ‘‘help lead the Peace Corps community in fostering peace through service, education and advocacy.’’

In the NPCA network, there are 30,000 individuals who participate in our national or affiliates’ activities and support our mission. These individuals reside in 

all 50 states. The NPCA’s 154 affiliated groups are in 45 states and the District of 

Columbia. The NPCA’s objective is to be a resource for the Peace Corps community. 

The NPCA has programs to promote service, enhance understanding of other cultures, and to advocate around issues of concern to our community. 

Over the past seven months, I have met with 25 of NPCA’s affiliates and talked 

about the Peace Corps experience with more than a thousand former volunteers and 

staff in small and large groups. The one common theme through all of these discussions is that Peace Corps service is a defining experience that continues to shape 

our lives. Among the community of those who have served, there is broad, deep and 

passionate support for Peace Corps, which often leads to ongoing service back home. 

This community understands the vital importance of having volunteers working 

overseas—as they have done in more than 130 countries—to promote peace through 

training individuals in their host country, educating them about the United States, 

and upon their return educating Americans about the country in which they served. 

This reflects Peace Corps’ three goals, which are perceived as every bit as vital 

today as when Peace Corps was established 43 years ago. 

This fervent support for the Peace Corps mission continues despite the growing 

awareness of concerns about our country’s security and the safety and security of 

volunteers. This community understands more than ever the vital importance of 

America’s positive engagement with the rest of the world especially at the grassroots level, living together as friends and colleagues, which only Peace Corps provides. 

During these many conversations, I also have learned that no two of the 171,000 

Americans who have served as Peace Corps volunteers have an identical experience. 

There are vast differences based on the volunteer, the country, the assignment, the 

era, and the people we served. There are, however, many common threads linking 

these experiences across the generations of volunteers regardless of the country or 

region of service or the nature of the assignment. These common threads include 

serving in often remote locations, as perhaps the only American, learning another 

language and living with others as friends and colleagues and developing a deep appreciation of another culture. Even with these many commonalities, it is difficult to 

generalize. So, Mr. Chairman, I would like to provide some perspective on this important of safety and security issue by describing my own experience. 

I became a Peace Corps Volunteer in 1976 and served for three years. My group 

arrived in Thailand the month after the last U.S. soldiers stationed there during 

the Vietnam War departed but while there was still fighting, especially in the border areas. 

My training involved three components: 1) Thai language, 2) Teaching EnglishAs-A-Second Language, and 3) Cross-cultural. Having studied nine different languages in some fashion, I can attest that Peace Corps provided the finest language 

training I ever received. The technical training was sufficient to ensure that we 

would succeed as teachers in a Thai classroom. The cross-cultural training component provided invaluable insights about how to live and adapt to what was then an 

extremely foreign culture. 

After 9-weeks of training, I was sent to an isolated post in Dan Sai district, Loei 

province approximately ten miles from the border with Laos in an area described 

as ‘‘sensitive.’’ In that area there was ongoing fighting between insurgents and government forces. The closest volunteers were 60 kilometers to the South or 90 kilometers to the East, both over mountainous roads that were nearly impassable in 

the monsoons. Like many volunteers who had gone before me, I knew there was 

some risk associated with my assignment since it was in one of the most isolated 

and poorest parts of the country. 

Before my arrival at my post in Dan Sai, a Peace Corps program manager had 

visited the site and meet with the host counterpart to ensure that there was an appropriate work assignment and housing. 

Although there was considerable ongoing fighting in Dan Sai district, including 

frequent firings of 105 millimeter shells, common sightings of helicopter gunships 

and ambushes of government outposts, at my site I never felt threatened or in danger. This was due to the fact that I was included in and identified as part of the 

community. It seemed that all the people in Dan Sai understood who I was and that 

I was teaching their children. Since I was incorporated into the community, filing 

the emergency action plan that Peace Corps required of all volunteers seemed a bit 

unnecessary if not unreal. 

47

While a volunteer in Dan Sai, I was visited by the Country Director—who 25 

years later gave me a copy of my letter regarding his visit. I was also visited by 

one other volunteer who lived in the provincial capital, who I would visit typically 

once a month. Communication was by mail since there was no phone service in my 

district. To make a phone call required travel to the provincial capital, 90 kilometers 

away. However, the mail and a yearly monitoring visit plus periodic trips to Bangkok for training or medical purposes were sufficient. Modern technology, especially 

satellite and cell phones and access to the internet, provides today’s volunteers a 

much greater ability to stay in touch with the in-country Peace Corps staff, as well 

as their family and friends at home. 

In my second and third years, I worked in more urban settings. I transferred from 

Dan Sai because I thought I could make more of a contribution at a larger institution. Typically, I would be visited once a year by a Peace Corps official. 

The very nature of my initial Peace Corps assignment—in a remote area far from 

where tourists traveled or where they were scant Americans—made a deep impression on the people I worked and lived with. This encouraged them to see Peace 

Corps and the government that supported it in profound and important new ways, 

contributing to the most memorable experience of my life. That was truly remarkable given that the consequences of the war in Southeast Asia were still reverberating around the region. 

I recognize that my experience was unique to me and happened decades ago. 

Based on what I have learned from many other volunteers, however, it has some 

bearing on this topic. My experience involved Peace Corps basic approach to volunteer placement: 1) site assessment, 2) volunteer training, 3) monitoring, and 4) 

emergency planning. If I had not been placed in such a remote site, for which I was 

well prepared, I would not have been able to contribute or learn anywhere near as 

much as I did. I have heard from hundreds of other volunteers who had comparable 

kinds of postings in remote and ‘‘sensitive areas,’’ and they share my assessment. 

In the aftermath of the tragic events of September 2001, there has been growing 

public attention to the issue of safety and security of Americans overseas, including 

Peace Corps volunteers. Following the 2002 GAO Report and in the lead up and the 

aftermath of a series published by The Dayton Daily News, there has been lively 

discussion in the Peace Corps community about safety and security issues. 

Within this community there is a broad spectrum of opinion. However, among 

those of us who have served we agree that safety and security of volunteers must 

be a paramount concern. All our members grieve for the 252 volunteers who have 

lost their lives in service and have enormous sympathy for our fellow volunteers 

who have experienced harm. Whenever a tragedy occurs or whenever a volunteer 

is harmed we expect—in fact demand—that Peace Corps do everything humanly 

possible to be responsive. 

There is also a sense that the discussion on safety and security misses the broader 

context, whether the Peace Corps experience is, relatively speaking, any more risky 

in terms of homicides and assaults than life for a comparable cohort in urban America, overseas development workers or for volunteers with Peace Corps German, British, France and Japanese counterparts. In Appendix II, The GAO Report provides 

a brief comparison between Peace Corps and other programs that place volunteers 

overseas. Unfortunately, there is no statistical comparison regarding what those 

agencies experiences are with safety and security. 

In fact, one of the most eloquent testimonies to the importance of Peace Corps 

service is provided by the Radley family. I mention this because Gordon Radley, a 

volunteer in Malawi, was not able to testify today. Gordon’s older brother Larry 

along with another volunteer, David Crozier, were the first two volunteers who died 

in service. Larry death’s firmly shaped the future of the Radley family. After graduating from college, Larry’s sister Elana and his brother Gordon both joined the 

Peace Corps knowing full well the risks associated with service. 

In addition, there is concern among the community that the necessary attention 

to safety and security does not diminish the essential uniqueness and value of the 

Peace Corps experience—allowing Americans to live and work alongside our host 

country counterparts. Much of this value is based on a flexible approach to posting 

volunteers, whether it is in urban or rural settings. Volunteers are sent to where 

there is a cooperating host institution offering appropriate work, access to essential 

services, suitable housing, and an expressed need for them. All volunteers also prepare a plan for responding to emergencies. As I learned from the volunteers who 

were recently evacuated from Haiti, these plans work remarkably well. This is attested to by the fact that in the more than 30 post closings over the past decade 

due to civil war, political unrest, or concerns about repercussions related to the war 

in Iraq, there has not been an incident where a volunteer was harmed. 

48

There have been some proposals to post at least two volunteers to each site or 

consolidate groups of volunteers. That would diminish the experience and lessen the 

impact of Peace Corps without necessarily enhancing the safety and security of volunteers. Two volunteers posted together tend to be less well integrated and perhaps 

less well accepted by the local community. Two volunteers are more likely to be perceived as able to look after each other, thus diminishing the community’s need to 

have a stake in their safety and security. 

There is also some concern that the resources required to address safety and security concerns may undermine Peace Corps’ unique and vital contributions to U.S. 

foreign policy. This is especially the case if adequate funding is not provided to enable Peace Corps to meet the President’s goal of doubling the size of Peace Corps, 

which is endorsed by the community. 

In addition, the community believes that there is an opportunity to significantly 

expand the number of countries where Peace Corps is operating. Doing this would 

be extremely beneficial to the national interest. This can be done without jeopardizing volunteer’s safety and security, although it may require that Peace Corps develop a more flexible approach to programming. For example, this may require relying on technical cooperation agreements in lieu of bilateral agreements as in the recent case of Mexico. It may also require somewhat shorter or more flexible assignments, perhaps only a year service or two years service that could be interrupted 

for a short period for a home visit. 

Doubling the size of Peace Corps and expanding to new countries are goals endorsed by the community. It will require significant new resources, which do not appear to be forthcoming. Thus, any new requirements related to safety and security 

that Congress decides to implement must be accompanied by additional financial resources. 

Much of the discussion seems to miss the fact that concern with volunteer safety 

and security is not new. Recently, I have had the chance to talk with seven of the 

Peace Corps Directors, spanning from the first Director to the current Director. For 

all of these directors, safety of the volunteers was a critical issue. Over the past few 

years, significant new investments have been made to address these issues in the 

context of current global realities. 

Mr. Chairman, I understand that the Committee is considering legislation to address the issue of volunteer safety and security. I have had a chance to see briefly 

a draft of this legislation, which I understand has three main components: 1) make 

the Office of Inspector General more independent by having the Inspector General 

be a presidential appointment, 2) create an Office of Ombudsman, and 3) establish 

statutorily the Office of Safety and Security. 

Speaking simply as someone who has served, I would say that:

• Changing the status of the Inspector General is unlikely to have any effect 

on volunteer’s safety and security.

• Creating an Office of Ombudsman would be perceived by the Peace Corps 

community as being responsive to many former volunteers, especially those 

who have been harmed or become ill during their service and not received 

promised post-service support. They will perceive that their concerns are 

being addressed by a strong, vibrant mechanism advocating for their interests.

• Establishing statutorily the Office of Safety and Security would be a way to 

underscore the Congress’s concern with and commitment to ensure the safety 

and security of volunteers and a recognition that these issues are a current 

reality and will be with us for many decades to come. This Office should be 

charged with notifying any volunteer victimized by crime be notified about 

the processing of criminal charges.

Recently, I have also heard reports of changes that may affect the Office of Medical Services. The community considers this Office critical to volunteer’s safety and 

security and wishes to see that this Office has the resources required and the authority necessary to play its critical role. 

It is essential that whatever Congress does to address this issue of volunteer safety and security should not impede the fundamental mission and style of Peace 

Corps, which has contributed to its success over the past four decades. Equally important is that whatever Congress does on this issue should not detract from the 

vitally important goal of expanding the numbers of serving volunteers and that the 

President’s 2005 budget request is met. 

Chairman Hyde and Ranking Democratic Member Lantos, the Peace Corps community thanks you for addressing the issue of volunteer safety and security. The 

NPCA will work with you and the Committee to ensure that these issues are adVerDate Mar 21 2002 10:27 Jul 13, 2004 Jkt 092188 PO 00000 Frm 00052 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6621 F:\WORK\FULL\032404\92743.000 HINTREL1 PsN: SHIRL
49

dressed in ways that preserve the essence of the Peace Corps mission and best advance U.S. interests. We will also work relentlessly so that the President’s budget 

request can be met, providing many more Americans with the opportunity to serve 

their country through the Peace Corps and to bring that experience back to America. 

Thank you.

Chairman HYDE. Thank you, Mr. Quigley. 

Inspector General Smith? 

STATEMENT OF THE HONORABLE CHARLES D. SMITH, 

INSPECTOR GENERAL, THE PEACE CORPS 

Mr. SMITH. Mr. Chairman, Members of the Committee, I appreciate the opportunity to appear before you today. 

My testimony addresses two subjects; the role of the Office of Inspector General in Peace Corps Volunteer safety and security and 

the proposed legislation on the Peace Corps IG’s independence. 

As the General Accounting Office report makes plain, volunteer 

safety and security needs careful and continuing review, and staff 

turnover is a major impediment to professional management. 

In the new safety and security design, the IG now has principal 

responsibility for the agency’s response to violent crimes against 

volunteers. With the director’s office and the general counsel, we 

developed a protocol about how the agency will respond to violent 

crimes against volunteers. It clarified the IG’s responsibility and 

authority to assist and coordinate in the prosecution of these 

crimes and established a cleaner balance between medical care for 

victims and pursuit of justice for victims. 

In January 2004, the director reinforced for all overseas offices 

and headquarters that this protocol is agency policy. It works in 

this way. We receive regular incident reports about both major 

crimes against volunteers and crimes of less immediacy that still 

carry signals about safety. 

When a volunteer is a victim of a violent crime, our investigators 

are quickly involved. We are careful, however, not to interfere with 

any medical care while we help launch the investigative process. 

Overseas and headquarters offices notify us of the incident. We 

continue contact with them and at the State Department work with 

diplomatic security and the Embassy’s regional security officer. 

Through the RSO, we assist in developing the best evidence for 

local trial from witness statements to photo spreads to DNA analysis, and as needed we accompany witnesses back for lineups, 

depositions and trial. 

We consult with the Justice Department’s Office of Foreign Litigation and obtain assistance from the FBI, including the forensic 

laboratory at Quantico and the overseas legal attaches, from the 

Armed Forces Institute of Pathology at the Walter Reed Army 

Medical Center and from the Secret Service Forensic Services Division. In short, we manage and coordinate the agency’s part of the 

investigative and prosecution process from the initial incident to 

the closing of the case. 

In addition to the work of our investigators, our program evaluations and audits have for years included a section on safety and security. Audits focus on post physical and vehicle security. Evaluations concentrate on elements of volunteer safety and security such 

as site development, housing, jobs, in-country transportation and 

50

emergency action plans. Our program and management assessments will continue to include reviews of overseas volunteer safety 

and security. 

In summary, we consider volunteer safety and security to be a 

significant area for our attention. We are part of the Peace Corps, 

and the major focus of the Peace Corps is the volunteer. We give 

high attention to risks volunteers may face, crimes they may encounter and how the agency protects their safety and security. We 

do this in our evaluations and audits and through our work on individual cases. 

We assist in investigations and prosecutions and hopefully convictions of criminals who have injured volunteers. Our success 

sends a message of deterrence. Volunteers must be respected and 

protected. 

We also identify places requiring special attention; for example, 

a vacation beach area where a volunteer was seriously assaulted, 

and in turned out five local women also were attacked. It is now 

off limits to volunteers. 

Our work has impact case by case through deterrence and commanding respect for volunteers and by identifying situations that 

require the attention of the many offices overseas and here within 

the agency itself and outside that are part of the system providing 

safety and security to volunteers. 

Turning to the question of IG independence, I want to distinguish between independence based on one’s ability and relationship 

with the director and independence based upon legal and structural 

support. I have enjoyed the former, while being troubled about the 

latter. 

The IG Act places all designated Federal entity IGs—that is the 

IGs appointed by agency heads—and their staffs under their agency’s personnel rules. The IG and OIG staff today are, therefore, 

subject to Peace Corps Act’s nonrenewal term limits. 

Amending the Inspector General Act to make the Peace Corps IG 

a Presidential, Senate confirmed appointee, would cure the serious 

independence issue that the Peace Corps IG uniquely, among all 

IGs, currently faces; periodic, but uncertain, reappointment within 

a set, nonrenewal timeframe. This amendment would protect the 

IG and OIG staff from the restrictions affecting independence that 

are built into the agency’s personnel rules. As in other IG offices, 

it would permit the development of a core professional staff, increase sophistication about the agency, work on longer term 

projects and greater insight and complexity and analysis. 

As an alternative, amending the Peace Corps Act to exempt the 

IG and OIG staff positions from time limits on employment would 

remove the most immediate statutory impediment to the IG’s independence and his or her hiring, training and retaining the most capable staff. 

To close on a personal note, I will reach 81⁄2 years of Peace Corps 

employment this August, first as deputy and then as IG. I have 

had five extensions under three directors. I have felt no effort to 

influence my personnel decisions, and no extension I have sought 

for staff has been denied. I do know, however, that in the earlier 

history of our office extensions were denied. 

51

1 United States General Accounting Office, ‘‘Peace Corps: Initiatives for Addressing Safety and 

Security Challenges Hold Promise, but Progress Should Be Assessed,’’ July 2002, at p. 45. 

In any case, the Peace Corps Act itself invites and even requires 

intrusion through the director’s discretion into the IG’s personnel 

decisions and his or her own tenure. Both affect the IG’s independence. Amending the IG Act as proposed would be the most sure resolution of this problem. Amending the Peace Corps Act to lift the 

5-year rule from the IG and staff would also resolve the most important structural and legal impediment to independence. 

Thank you, Mr. Chairman, for the opportunity to testify today. 

[The prepared statement of Mr. Smith follows:]

PREPARED STATEMENT OF THE HONORABLE CHARLES D. SMITH, INSPECTOR GENERAL, 

THE PEACE CORPS

Mr. Chairman and Members of the Committee, I appreciate the opportunity to appear before you today. 

In this written statement, I will address the role of the Office of Inspector General 

in Peace Corps Volunteer safety and security and the proposed legislation on the 

Peace Corps IG’s independence. As the General Accounting Office report makes 

plain, Volunteer safety and security needs careful and continuing review, and staff 

turnover in the Peace Corps is a major impediment to professional management. 

In the post-9/11 era, the agency has given unambiguous priority to Volunteer safety and security. The Director created the Office of Safety and Security with responsibility for overseas training, data collection and analysis, and physical security here 

and overseas. This is the preventative office which will guide the agency’s response 

to safety and security issues surrounding Volunteer service. 

In addition, the Director appointed a Compliance Officer, who has focused on two 

main areas. First is up-to-date emergency action plans. The high quality of this 

work became clear when the Peace Corps’ evacuated Volunteers from Cote d’Ivoire, 

Morocco, and Haiti. Her second area of attention is IG reports. She receives all our 

reports, both preliminary and final, and works with the regions to obtain evidence 

that posts have carried out the agreed-upon responses to our recommendations, with 

particular attention to safety and security. 

In the new safety and security design, the IG now has principal responsibility for 

the agency’s response to violent crimes against Volunteers. With the Director’s office 

and the General Counsel, we developed the ‘‘Protocol: Violent Crimes Against Volunteers,’’ which clarified the IG’s responsibility and authority to assist and coordinate 

in the prosecution of serious crimes against Volunteers. In January 2004, the Director advised all overseas offices and headquarters that the Protocol is agency policy. 

We are in regular contact with the Director, the regions, overseas posts, and the 

Offices of Safety and Security, Medical Services, Special Services, and General 

Counsel, among others. . Compliance is working: we are receiving regular notice of 

incident reports, both major crimes—e.g., rape, aggravated assault, robbery—and 

crimes of less immediacy—e.g., simple assault, theft, burglary—that still carry important signals about safety. Importantly, the Protocol also establishes a cleaner 

balance between medical care for victims and pursuit of justice for victims. The 

GAO report noted that ‘‘the Volunteer’s identity and details of the incident may not 

be disclosed’’ in cases of sexual assault.1 The new Protocol clarifies, however, that 

such fundamental information is needed for law enforcement purposes, and there 

are full privacy protections against its disclosure. 

When a Volunteer is the victim of a violent crime, our investigators are quickly 

involved. We are careful not to interfere with any medical care while we help launch 

the investigative process. The country director and headquarters offices notify us of 

the incident; we continue contact with them and, at the State Department, work 

with Diplomatic Security and the embassy’s RSO; through the RSO, we assist in developing the best evidence for local trial, from witness statements to photo spreads 

to DNA analysis; and, as needed, we accompany witnesses back for lineups, depositions, and trial. We consult with the Justice Department’s Office of Foreign Litigation, and obtain assistance from the FBI, including the forensic laboratory at 

Quantico and the overseas legal attaches, the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology 

at the Walter Reed Army Medical Center, and the Secret Service Forensic Services 

Division. In short, we manage and coordinate the agency’s part of the investigative 

and prosecution process from the initial incident to the closing of the case. 

52

2See id. at pp. 15–17. 

3See The Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended, Title 5, Appendix, section 3(a) and (b). 

4 Id. Section 8G(a) defines ‘‘federal entity’’ and lists Designated Federal Entities, which include 

the Peace Corps. 5 Id. Section 8G(c): ‘‘. . . the Inspector General shall be appointed by the head of the designated Federal entity in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations governing appointments within the designated Federal entity.’’ 6 Id. Section 8G(e): ‘‘If an Inspector General is removed from office or is transferred to another 

position or location within a designated Federal entity, the head of the designated Federal entity 

shall promptly communicate in writing the reasons for any such removal or transfer to both 

houses of Congress.’’ 7 Each Peace Corps employee receives form SF–50: Notification of Personnel Action, which includes a ‘‘not to exceed’’ date, recording when the appointment will end. An extension is reflected in a new SF–50 by a change in the NTE date. 8The Peace Corps Act, Section 2506, established parameters for employment. There is a regular tour not to exceed 5 years, and agency policy has split that period into two 21⁄2 year or 

30 month tours. The Director is given discretion to extend an employee’s appointment by one 

year and by another 21⁄2 years, with both types of extensions exercised under certain criteria. 

Extension periods can be shortened or further subdivided. In sum, the outside length of employment is 81⁄2 years, reached through incremental steps. Finally, before a person is eligible to reapply to work at the Peace Corps, they must have been outside for as long as they most recently 

were employed: in for 3 years, out for 3 years. 9On a personal note, I will reach 81⁄2 years of Peace Corps employment this August, and as 

Deputy and then IG, I have had five extensions under three Directors. 

In addition to our investigations of cases, our program evaluations and audits 

have for years included a section on safety and security. Audits focus on post physical and vehicle security. Evaluations concentrate on elements of Volunteer safety 

and security, such as site development, housing, jobs, in-country transportation, and 

emergency action plans. Our program and management assessments will continue 

to include reviews of overseas office and Volunteer safety and security. An example 

of one safety and security issue is our urging action on monitoring and closing Volunteer hostels, and the agency has issued directives tightening requirements. Another safety and security area we always examine overseas, but have not addressed 

formally on an agency-wide basis, is job development. A good job is a central element in Volunteer safety and security, and each of our reports covers jobs and assignments as both a program and safety issue.2

Turning to the question of IG independence, I want to distinguish between independence based on one’s ability and support from the agency’s administration and 

independence strengthened by legal and structural support. I have enjoyed the 

former while being troubled about the latter. 

All three parts of the proposed legislation would impact the work of the Office of 

Inspector General, but the first is clearly most important to us. 

It would establish the Peace Corps Inspector General as a Presidential, Senateconfirmed appointee by amending the Inspector General Act. This change would directly address the Peace Corps IG’s independence through the appointment and removal power and the term of office for the IG and OIG staff. It would cure the serious independence issue that the Peace Corps IG, uniquely among all IGs, currently 

faces: periodic but uncertain reappointment within a set, non-renewable time-frame. 

IGs appointed by the President can only be removed by the President, with communication to Congress.3 In Designated Federal Entities,4 IGs are appointed by 

agency heads5 and may be removed by them, with Congress being informed after 

the fact.6 Since the IG Act does not specify a term of office, removal under this procedure requires action by the agency head. Like other heads of DFE agencies, the 

Peace Corps Director may remove the IG at any point under the IG Act. 

While the Peace Corps Director exercises the regular DFE appointment and removal authority, the Peace Corps Act—which requires that a term limit on employment be set for all employees—gives him additional appointment and removal flexibility. 

In the Peace Corps, appointments do not exceed 30 months, and the employee 

may receive a series of reappointments, some as short as a year or even a few 

months.7 While 81⁄2 years is the maximum total appointment term under the Peace 

Corps Act,8 the IG, like any other Peace Corps employee, faces possible termination 

of employment every 30 months or less. This is because Peace Corps policy splits 

the five-year limit into half, a first tour of 30 months and a likely but not required 

second tour of 30 months.9

Applying the Peace Corps Act’s appointment and removal provisions to the IG can 

impact the appearance of IG independence through short, sequential appointments 

and can accomplish IG removal simply through appointment expiration. In contrast, 

under the IG Act, appointments are unlimited and removals must be reported to 

53

10Through the IG Act, DFE employees are subject to the employment rules of their agency. 

Section 8G(g)(2) provides: ‘‘In addition to the other authorities specified in this Act, an Inspector 

General is authorized to select, appoint, and employ such officers and employees as may be necessary for carrying out the functions, powers, and duties of the Office of Inspector General and 

to obtain the temporary or intermittent services of experts or consultants or an organization 

thereof, subject to the applicable laws and regulations that govern such selections, appointments, and employment, and the obtaining of such services, within the designated Federal entity.’’ I have made one change from Peace Corps practice. Unlike all other Peace Corps appointments, including the IG, I appoint OIG staff for a five year tour, rather than a 30 month tour 

with possible extension. 11 I wish to underscore that, in my experience, there has been no effort to influence my personnel decisions, and no extension I have sought for staff has been denied. I do know, however, 

that in the earlier history of our office, extensions were denied. 12 Congress applied the idea of unlimited appointments to the Peace Corps in the 2003 appropriations law, which gave the Director discretion to make unlimited appointments for positions 

in the safety and security area, with explicit authority to consider the OIG for this purpose. This 

statutory authority was based on a recommendation in the General Accounting Office report on 

Peace Corps safety and security. 

Congress. These same rules apply to OIG staff, and for the first five years, personnel decisions are made by the IG.10 Because OIG staff are Peace Corps employees subject to the ‘‘five-year rule,’’ their extensions require the Director’s approval. 

I may hire them for five years—the maximum I can control—but for anyone to work 

in the OIG beyond five years, I need the Director’s approval, and there still remains 

the 81⁄2 year ceiling.11 In this fashion, the Peace Corps Act injects itself through the 

Director’s discretion into the IG’s personnel decisions, and presents an additional 

limit on independence.12

Like this bill, DFE IG leadership has focused on IG appointments and has proposed that the IG Act be modified in two ways. One would establish a term limit—

9 years has been suggested since it spans administrations—that is renewable. The 

other would permit IG removal only for cause. 

The idea of an ombudsman is useful. In some situations, the OIG acts as an ombudsman. Staff or Volunteers come to us seeking the kind of help that we conclude 

is best referred to an office in the agency for their attention. Other Peace Corps offices may serve in an ombudsman role, too: for example, General Counsel, American 

Diversity/EEO, and Special Services. If establishing an ombudsman office were recommended, the function might, like the Designated Agency Ethics Official, be located in the Office of the General Counsel, with the statute providing necessary special authority, including mandatory access to the Director, and the Director using 

his budgetary authority to make it effective. 

One concern I have with a statutory Office of Safety and Security is possible impact on agency flexibility. For instance, today that Office is responsible for background checks on U.S. direct hires, traditionally a personnel function. The responsibility for IT security might also be housed elsewhere. The bill places both under the 

Office. The most important focus of the Office should be Volunteer safety and security. Anything separate from that should, I would suggest, call for a second look. 

Thank you. We would be pleased to provide any further information you need.

Chairman HYDE. Thank you very much, and I might mention, 

General Smith, that I share your dislike for silly term limits which 

downgrades the priceless value of experience. 

Mr. SMITH. Thank you, sir. 

Chairman HYDE. Director Vasquez, would you sit at the table? 

We will now entertain questions. I would ask the Members to try 

to be brief so we can everybody get a chance to ask questions. 

Ms. McCollum? 

Ms. MCCOLLUM. Thank you, Mr. Chair. 

To the Poirier family, I am very sad for the loss of your son, Walter. You should not have been lied to, and you should not have 

been treated so insensitively by having your name on a list as it 

continued, and for that I apologize. 

I had the opportunity to be with Ms. Brooks, director in South 

Africa, in which when we visited a Peace Corps site we asked about 

safety concerns as there were two women there, one who was just 

finishing up her service, a woman who after retirement as a nurse 

54

volunteered in the Peace Corps, and another individual who was 

just coming on, someone younger. 

They said one of the most important things to their safety was 

integration in the community and following the community norms 

and standards, which were different for women than they are here 

in the United States. 

I also from reading some of the reports, both provided by the government report and in the Dayton News, have found that using 

good judgment is very important, but also the use of alcohol was 

very much in having the Peace Corps Volunteers be in jeopardy. It 

was a major, major factor in many of the stories. 

As you mention that you have now realigned into the Peace 

Corps and have 80 people, if I understood correctly, working on 

safety and security, what more do you think the Peace Corps can 

do to make volunteers aware of the consequences of alcohol and the 

awareness of how a cross cultural relationship and gender roles 

place particularly female volunteers at risk for sexual assault? 

Mr. VASQUEZ. Congresswoman, the approach that we have taken 

in terms of moving forward relates principally to the kind of training that we have retooled in light of the fact that the majority of 

the volunteers serving in the Peace Corps today are women. It was 

not always that way, but it is that way today, and the trends indicate that it will continue to be so in terms of the number of applicants and the number of women serving in the Peace Corps. 

What we have done is in our training processes in the preservice 

training, which I think was some of the discussion that you had 

when you were visiting in country, we have retooled some of that 

training to heighten the issue of cultural sensitivities. Some of the 

traditions and values that we have in this country may not be applicable in a host country where volunteers serve. So we elevate 

the awareness in some of the training that some of the issues that 

may surface during the course of a Peace Corps Volunteer’s service 

can create problems and create challenges. 

I do believe that one of the key elements to being successful for 

us, whether it is safety and security or it is cultural awareness, is 

going to be in the training. We are very, very sensitive to that 

great need because we do get the feedback, as you were able to 

hear from some volunteers. This is the way things are evolving in 

light of a changing world, in light of a changing demographic of 

Peace Corps, as we are also experiencing when we talk about older 

volunteers who are serving in the Peace Corps, and couples serving 

in the Peace Corps. 

There are the norms that are different in the host country that 

we need to address, and we are trying to do so by virtue of the 

training modules that we provide during those 12 weeks of 

preservice training and then in-service training. 

Ms. MCCOLLUM. Thank you. 

Mr. Bruce, I read some of the Dayton Daily News stories and the 

accounts of sexual violence, assaults, robberies. They are very 

chilling, and it is clear that the Peace Corps as an agency has a 

major responsibility to keep volunteers safe. 

It is also clear that volunteers also have a responsibility for their 

own personal safety and health. After reading your stories, what 

responsibility do volunteers have themselves, as the director and I 

55

were discussing, in alcohol use awareness as in cross cultural sensitivity? What did you find that the personal responsibility of all 

the volunteers were in these instances? 

Mr. BRUCE. Yes. I think it was very clear that some of the volunteers who ended up being victims of violence of one kind or another 

were engaged in unwise or unsafe activities. 

I think there is a mixture of issues associated with that, which 

includes where they were at the time, and I think one of the issues 

that emerged from our reporting were questions about whether or 

not there are adequate work in advance before placing of volunteers, whether or not the housing conditions that volunteers arrive 

at are adequately checked out in advance and safe, whether or not 

their mission and training is sufficient in advance of their arrival 

that they do not have a lot of idle time on their hands that ends 

up getting misused in activities. 

Ms. MCCOLLUM. I understand that, but it is a mutual responsibility. 

Mr. BRUCE. No question about it. 

Ms. MCCOLLUM. Mr. Chair, I just want to say that the world is 

a changing place, and it is a very dangerous place. The Peace 

Corps is needed more than ever, and we need to make sure that 

we give the Peace Corps the tools so the director can make the experience a safe and secure one. 

Thank you, Mr. Chair. 

Chairman HYDE. The gentleman from California, Mr. Royce? 

Mr. ROYCE. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. 

I have had the opportunity, Director Vasquez, to meet with a 

number of Peace Corps Volunteers in Africa over the years, but 

even on short trips, and one comes to mind in Nigeria, we saw the 

risks that overseas development workers take. 

During a period of time in 1999 when myself and Secretary Powell were in Nigeria as election monitors. There was another team 

that former President Carter was with—two members of that team 

were robbed at gunpoint. This is the type of risk that Peace Corps 

Volunteers are inherently in in many of these difficult places, many 

of these remote locales where they try to do their work. 

Africa, unfortunately, sees a great deal of civil strife, and civil 

conflict there can evolve very, very rapidly. You had to pull volunteers out of Madagascar and out of Cote d’Ivoire, and I talked with 

those volunteers in Africa about their experiences there. 

How often have Peace Corps Volunteers been evacuated, and 

what happens in an emergency situation like this, and what is the 

decision process to return them back into the country? 

Mr. VASQUEZ. Congressman, the process of risk management for 

us is ongoing and is constant. Part of that is being vigilant, monitoring developments in countries, and I would use Haiti as a recent 

example, the most recent evacuation. Cote d’Ivoire was another example. Madagascar was the first evacuation that occurred during 

my time here at the Peace Corps. 

We monitor activities as they begin to surface in country. We 

work with the Embassy, with the regional security officer, with our 

own safety and security personnel, and with the country director. 

The country team begins to discuss scenarios and issues that start 

to develop. 

56

I would prefer to not go into much intricate detail because I 

think that that is information that we would like to reserve so that 

it is kept confidential, but, generally speaking, what we do is assess the situation. 

We evaluate the conditions and circumstances, and essentially 

for me as the director and as a person who makes the ultimate decision, my test is that when volunteers’ work is disrupted or interrupted to the extent that they can no longer do their work, then 

it is time to evaluate the possibility of consolidation of volunteers 

to a certain location and ultimately to evacuate. If an evacuation 

occurs, we deploy the kind of resources, whether it is aircraft or it 

is landcraft, whatever we need to do to get those volunteers out of 

country. 

Once we have suspended or evacuated, rather, a program, we 

make a decision about suspending, closing a program, and we go 

through a process of internal discussions, as well as talking to 

staff, talking to the chief of mission in that host country. 

If we decide that we are going to consider going back, we do a 

full assessment of the country as if we were entering the country 

for the first time. We evaluate medical, security, operational, programmatic issues, and support of host government. 

All of those processes are evaluated, and then ultimately a recommendation is made to me, and a decision is made about returning to a country. 

Mr. ROYCE. Let me also ask you. In light of this post 9/11 world, 

what changes have you made in the Peace Corps since your arrival 

specifically to enhance volunteer safety? 

You mentioned the increase by 80 of safety and security staff and 

the reorganization of that staff to better communicate and better 

monitor volunteers. What is the daily role of these new safety and 

security staff personnel, and could you maybe tell us how they 

monitor volunteers in-country? 

Mr. VASQUEZ. First of all, the field based staff that I talked 

about, which is about 95 percent of those new employees who are 

involved in safety and security, include a safety and security coordinator at every post in Peace Corps. 

The responsibility of that safety and security coordinator is to ensure that forms, locator forms, documents that need to be filed by 

volunteers, measures that need to be met by posts, arrive in a 

timely and compliant fashion. This is so that there are no glitches 

in the timetables for accountability on the locator forms for volunteers, accountability on complying with issues relative to the GAO 

reports that have been done. The Inspector General works with the 

country director to ensure that we are responding to those safety 

and security issues. 

In addition to that, the country director, who is not a new employee, but we have one in every country, is the ultimate person 

who is accountable at post for safety and security in country. 

We have added additional regional safety and security officers 

who cover regions of the world and supplement and support the 

safety and security coordinators. They have regions in the world 

that they cover. We have nine, and we intend to expand that next 

year by adding another three regional safety and security officers. 

57

We have designated at headquarters an associate director for 

safety and security who reports to me. That is a first at Peace 

Corps. We have now a person fully dedicated, a research psychologist, who now looks at our data in terms of crime statistics and 

trends to identify, analyze, evaluate and make recommendations on 

where we may need to change practices, policies and procedures in 

order to enhance safety and security. 

So it takes on many layers of responsibility, but the bulk of the 

deployment of personnel in these new slots that we have implemented are in the field. 

Chairman HYDE. The gentlelady from California, Ms. 

Napolitano? 

Ms. NAPOLITANO. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. 

It is good to see you, Mr. Vasquez. I was not here to hear your 

presentation. I apologize. 

In listening to the testimony, and again my condolences to the 

family and other families who have lost volunteers, my question in 

listening to and reading some of the testimony is the fact that 

about 70 percent of your volunteers are now women. I guess maybe 

I want to gear my comments to that. 

There is an increase. How is this affecting your program? How 

are you dealing? How are you promoting special training for them 

in safety and in cultural differences in several of those areas? 

According to what I am reading, the Dayton Daily News suggests 

that they are sent abroad and do not receive proper training, and 

there is little or no supervision. To me, if you are supposedly giving 

them proper training how is that training being given, to whom 

and in what amount geared to the country they are going to? 

Mr. VASQUEZ. Well, first of all, I think it is important to mention 

that the procedures that we use today in terms of safety and security and the discussion about safety and security begins when the 

applicant meets up with the recruiter. 

Our recruiters in our 11 offices across the country realize that 

safety and security is a major issue. Consequently, the discussion 

about the risks of safety and security, whether it is a man or 

woman volunteer, young-, old-, or middle-aged couples, begins at a 

very early stage. 

That is followed up then, by the time a potential volunteer who 

then becomes a nominee goes to their staging here in the United 

States for 21⁄2 days. We have added time within that training 

phase to talk about safety and security, with emphasis obviously on 

women because there is this increased percentage of women volunteers, so that is part of the training. 

Once the volunteer gets to the country in which he or she is 

going to serve, there is a 12 week training program during which 

again safety and security is emphasized, up to and including having to meet certain core competencies in order to be able to complete the 12 week training program. 

Within that training program there is discussion about cultural 

sensitivities, about some of the higher sensitivities that women 

may have to have because of cross cultural issues, because of society’s norms in the country in which they are going to serve, personal safety, personal management of safety, certain areas about 

public transportation, about housing, about the kinds of things that 

58

that country in particular has experienced as opposed to just a 

boilerplate, across-the-board training module. It is about the country in which they are going to serve. 

Consequently, once the volunteer completes that 12 week training program, they are sworn in as volunteers. During the course 

of time additional in-service training opportunities are provided, 

and there are mentors, and volunteer leaders, who also provide 

guidance to women volunteers where necessary and appropriate. 

Chairman HYDE. Ms. Napolitano, I am going to trespass on your 

time. I expect a vote any second. May I ask Mr. Weller if he has 

a question? 

Ms. NAPOLITANO. If I have the ability to come back because I 

have one other question to ask. 

Chairman HYDE. We will come back if we have time. 

Mr. Weller, briefly please. 

Mr. WELLER. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I appreciate the courtesy of my friend and colleague from California for the opportunity. 

Mr. Poirier, for both you and Mrs. Poirier, my heart goes out to 

you. Peace Corps has tremendous support in this country and this 

Congress with President Bush, and your son clearly was demonstrating his love of our country, as well as his commitment to 

service. We are very saddened by the loss of your son, and we 

thank you for his commitment to our country and for the world. 

Director, I realize the challenge for you is these were challenges, 

many of which you inherited, and you have been working to respond to them. Just walk me through the process. If a volunteer 

is a victim of an attack, what are the steps that are taken? If you 

could just share with us the steps that are taken? 

You know, I think we all realize there are people in the world 

hostile to America, hostile to our interests, who recognize the good 

will that is created as a result of the work of volunteers in the 

Peace Corps, so perhaps by harassing and intimidating they discourage them from being there and reduce the good impression we 

make, particularly in the hearts and minds of others around the 

world. 

What are the steps that are taken? What is the role of the victim 

in dealing perhaps if the attackers are apprehended in their prosecution? Can you just walk us through that process? 

Mr. VASQUEZ. Well, Congressman, what happens is that a volunteer reports a crime, and they are all reportable, but obviously 

there are varying degrees depending on the kind of crime it is. 

Assuming it is a reportable crime, it may involve, and there are 

variations on this, but it may involve a report to local law enforcement to engage local law enforcement in terms of reporting. It is 

also reported to the Peace Corps medical officer in-country who 

then fills out and completes a report depending on the nature of 

the crime against the volunteer. 

The country director is notified and gets involved. If it is a crime 

that involves a situation of an active pursuit, where it demands immediate attention, the regional security officer from the mission 

may be involved. The Embassy may be involved. Resources may be 

deployed where necessary on the guidance of the regional security 

officer. 

59

Under our new protocol, the Inspector General’s Office is notified. 

The Inspector General then makes an evaluation of the kinds of resources that he needs to deploy. The communication is established 

between the IG, the regional security officer, and the country staff, 

and resources are deployed in accordance with the seriousness of 

the crime and the situation and the circumstances. Then the appropriate people are used for both the investigation and subsequently, 

with the Inspector General, the prosecution and administration of 

justice that takes place in that country. 

This new protocol I believe is going to serve us quite well because 

it is going to be part of a more diligent process. But it is also going 

to provide a tracking process so that volunteers who are victimized 

are provided the kind of support and resources that they need, 

given the variation of legal systems that are applied throughout 

the world. That is a brief snapshot. 

Mr. WELLER. Director, just a quick followup. Technology is getting better, particularly in areas of communication all around the 

world. There are more cell phones every time I travel anywhere 

than I have ever seen before, so there is wireless capability. 

I was wondering. What are you doing in that area? As part of 

that question also, are you reconsidering the policy of sending volunteers out by themselves? 

Mr. VASQUEZ. First of all, we use communication technology 

based on the country and the reliability of the communication system. In some cases, cellular phones are used. In some countries, 90 

plus percent of the volunteers have cellular phones. In other cases 

it is not reliable, and in other places it is nonexistent. 

Whether there are cell phones or no cell phones, what we try to 

do is build layers of communication mechanisms so that it is not 

just about cell phones. If the system goes down for whatever reason, we need to have a backup system. We build that system within a community where a volunteer is placed, whether it is local law 

enforcement or the partner organization with whom the volunteer 

works or is assigned to, but we build an infrastructure for notification. 

We have instances where host families have called because a volunteer has been ill, has been needed to be transported, so the communication systems are multi-layered. 

I think that as far as the issue of co-locating or someone referred 

to clustering volunteers, I think as Mr. Quigley has accurately remarked, that putting two volunteers or multiple volunteers in one 

location can, one, be a potential security risk. It can also be a distraction and a disruption to the kind of work that volunteers 

should be doing as volunteers because, for over 43 years, one of the 

core values of Peace Corps service has been integration into the 

community. 

That is really the basis of the interaction, the promotion of crosscultural understanding, the integration into the community, building the kinds of relationships that make for a successful and fulfilling experience for Peace Corps Volunteers. I think that at this 

juncture, the models that have been used for Peace Corps are, I 

think, effective. I think they have been successful. 

I also need to add that there has been a perception created by 

some that volunteers are just sent out to some rural location and 

60

left to be by themselves. That is not true. The fact of the matter 

is that before a volunteer goes out to site there are discussions with 

partner organizations, with the community where that volunteer is 

going to be serving, and there are also volunteers within reasonable proximity. 

We have done surveys to test the time and the distance that volunteers have between each other and the frequency with which volunteers see each other, not to mention staff. 

Chairman HYDE. I am going to have to interrupt. 

Mr. VASQUEZ. Thank you. 

Chairman HYDE. Mr. Weller’s time has expired. We have to go 

over and vote. There are four votes pending, so I am going to adjourn the Committee. 

I would very much like Mr. Bruce and Mr. Ford to comment in 

writing if you can at your convenience on the corrective measures 

that Director Vasquez has introduced as to their adequacy and 

what remains to be done so we can move this along, if anything. 

I am very pleased at Director Vasquez’s testimony. 

This has been a wonderful panel. It has been instructive. We 

know a lot more than we knew before we started, and we are going 

to pursue this so that we can end up being helpful to the Peace 

Corps and to our country. 

I apologize, Mr. Farr, for not getting to you. As we fade into the 

distance, you are welcome to take over. 

Mr. FARR. Thank you very much. I know that we are rushed. 

Mr. Poirier, I came here for you. I am a returned Peace Corps 

Volunteer. I served in Colombia where Mr. Crozier and Mr. Radley, 

the first volunteers ever killed, died in an airplane accident. 

I am here because I also experienced a horrible tragedy while 

serving as a Peace Corps Volunteer. After my mother died of cancer 

in the United States, my sister and father came to visit me in Colombia. My sister was a junior in high school on summer vacation, 

she was only 16 years old. My sister, my father and I went horseback riding. My sister was thrown from a horse and we took her 

to a rural hospital, and they said nothing was wrong. A day later 

she died. She died because the hospital just did not have the equipment to diagnose her problem. 

I was very angry. I was sort of angry at Colombia where I was 

a Peace Corps Volunteer. I was sort of angry at life, angry at God 

and religion. I was pretty depressed. One day, though, I just realized that that is why I was in the Peace Corps, to try to improve 

the situation so that people would have access to health care and 

other services. That aspiration, to make a difference, is what eventually drove me into politics. 

I am here today because I really want to urge the Committee not 

to change the nature of the Peace Corps and not to create a ‘‘fortress America’’ Peace Corps Volunteer. That would destroy the nature of the Peace Corps. 

The most interesting comment that I have heard in all the years 

that I have been in Congress, was spoken by General Abizaid last 

week. General Abizaid is the General for all of CENTCOM, which 

covers parts of Africa and all of the Middle East. There are 270 

people serving under him. 

61

He said something very profound to the Appropriations Committee on military construction. He said that until the United 

States learns to cross the cultural divide, we will never have peace 

in this world. 

The only successful way we are learning to cross the cultural divide, the only really successful way, is through Peace Corps Volunteers because they do go to countries throughout the world, and 

they do take risks. I am concerned for their safety, but I think that 

with good training, and with good site placement, and if we address 

the issues that Director Vasquez has talked about, we can improve 

security for volunteers. 

I strongly urge this Committee not to overreact and try to create 

more of a bureaucracy, more rules, more regulations that are going 

to hinder or keep volunteers from reporting incidents. Try to preserve that initial spirit of Peace Corps that has served us so well. 

What is so fascinating about the Peace Corps is the demand to 

go in the Peace Corps has always been high, and I think it is now 

at an all-time high. The demand from other countries to have 

Peace Corps Volunteers is also at an all-time high. 

We are doing something right, and the only thing that stands in 

the way is whether Congress is going to appropriate enough money 

and enough resources to get the job done. 

This Committee passed the bill that authorized doubling the size 

of Peace Corps, and I urge you that we follow through with this 

commitment. If you have to make some administrative changes so 

be it, but not so that it hinders the role of work of the volunteer 

in the field. 

Thank you for allowing me to sit in. Mr. Poirier, I am very, very 

sorry about the loss of your son. 

Mr. ROYCE [presiding]. We thank the gentleman from California. 

We also want to express our deep appreciation and admiration 

for all that members of the Peace Corps and their families have 

done. We also want to thank you all for traveling to testify here 

today, for your input. We again appreciate that. 

At this time, this hearing stands adjourned. 

[Whereupon, at 12:15 p.m. the Committee was adjourned.] 

(63)

A P P E N D I X 

MATERIAL SUBMITTED FOR THE HEARING RECORD

MATERIAL SUBMITTED FOR THE RECORD BY THE HONORABLE TOM LANTOS, A

REPRESENTATIVE IN CONGRESS FROM THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

H.R. 4060

Mr. Chairman, I first want to thank you for your strong interest in the Peace 

Corps, its nearly 8,000 volunteers, and the larger Peace Corps community. The 

thoughtful attention that this Committee had lent to the Peace Corps Expansion Act 

of 2003 continued last week during our Full Committee hearing on safety and security issues within the Peace Corps, and is evident in today’s consideration of this 

bill. 

As you know, Mr. Chairman, last year’s Peace Corps Expansion Act authorized 

appropriations for the Peace Corps for five years and developed at least three fundamental elements for ensuring that the doubling of the Peace Corps is focused properly. 

Mr. Chairman, while these accomplishments are significant—and a testament to 

the ability of this Committee to influence positively an agency’s operations even 

without an enacted Peace Corps reauthorization—much more can be done to improve the health, safety, and security of Peace Corps volunteers, as our hearing last 

week demonstrated. 

According to the representative from the General Accounting Office, the Peace 

Corps is still not capturing fully the extent of crime against volunteers due to 

under-reporting by the volunteers themselves for a host of reasons, including a belief that the agency lacks the capacity or willingness to help. 

The GAO and the other witnesses also testified that the lack of well developed 

assignments discourage volunteers from adequately immersing themselves in their 

host communities and thereby benefiting from the protections afforded to members 

of these villages and towns. 

Finally, the witnesses noted that administrative impediments, such as limitations 

on terms of employment within the Peace Corps and worrisome changes within the 

Office of Medical Services, constrain Peace Corps employees from providing the best 

support possible to volunteers. 

Mr. Chairman, the bill that we are considering today addresses these issues by 

establishing an Ombudsman within the agency to listen and attend to volunteer and 

employee concerns, by increasing the independence of the Inspector General of the 

Peace Corps to strengthen his ability to act as watchdog on behalf of volunteers, 

by requiring the agency to study and report to us on how it can improve programming for volunteers, and lastly by lifting the term limits for key offices within the 

agency. 

I strongly support all of these provisions. 

Mr. Chairman, we must not lose sight of the fact that Peace Corps volunteers for 

over forty years have been doing an extraordinary job as our development ambassadors to the most remote corners of this earth. And they have been doing their jobs 

under difficult and, at times, risky conditions—although not riskier than working 

in many urban settings in this country, including Dayton, Ohio. 

As we consider measures to improve the health, safety, and security of our volunteers, we must be careful not to forge impenetrable shields around our volunteers 

which will make it harder for them to reach the young English student in 

Kazakhstan or the women’s cooperative in Peru, or they the volunteers. 

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. 

64

PREPARED STATEMENT OF THE HONORABLE NICK SMITH, A REPRESENTATIVE IN

CONGRESS FROM THE STATE OF MICHIGAN

I want to thank Chairman Hyde for holding this hearing today on the safety and 

security of our Peace Corps volunteers. This is a difficult but important topic. I look 

forward to hearing our witness’s testimony. 

The Peace Corps represents a great tradition of American volunteerism and charity. Ed Sharkey, in my Jackson District office served from 1979 to 1981 in the 

Yemen Arab Republic. He said ‘‘Peace Corps workers go out into the world, work 

on behalf of others, and share our values. When Americans volunteer abroad, they 

have been among our most successful public diplomats. If the Peace Corps is to continue to achieve its mission, it must be better prepared to face the challenges of 

today.’’ Ed suggested a visit to the website for fellow Peace Corps Volunteers brings 

home the real challenges that these American volunteers face today. He encouraged 

passage of Chairman Hyde’s legislation. 

At home, we have begun to respond to threats to our homeland. We must also 

prepare our Peace Corps volunteers to respond when they are abroad. The Peace 

Corps will have to train its volunteers to deal with the reality of violence in the 

field. The Peace Corps must also be reorganized to face today’s security challenge. 

Like all of our agencies, it must be more flexible, more efficient, and more aware 

of the context in which it operates. 

Again, I would like to thank the Chairman for holding this hearing today. Many 

of the stories that we will hear about the Peace Corps are tragic. However, it is because of these tragedies that we must act to improve and make changes to this organization. 

PREPARED STATEMENT OF THE HONORABLE EARL BLUMENAUER, A REPRESENTATIVE

IN CONGRESS FROM THE STATE OF OREGON

The Peace Corps is a critical part of American diplomacy. I hope that this hearing, 

in addition to helping ensure the safety and security of Peace Corps volunteers, 

draws attention to the great work done by the Peace Corps program and its thousands of volunteers each year. As I visit other countries, I am continually and deeply impressed by the commitment and contributions of Peace Corps volunteers of all 

ages. 

The Peace Corps provides the opportunity to large numbers of Americans, both 

young and old, to serve their country as ambassadors of peace, understanding, and 

goodwill. This is in addition to the very important and concrete work that Peace 

Corps volunteers do to assist people through development and education projects, 

as well as build cross-cultural bridges between the United States and diverse other 

societies. I believe that it is a profound statement about our American ideals that 

we provide the opportunity for those who choose to serve their country to do so by 

assisting others. 

This is a program that richly deserves continued funding and attention from Congress. I thank the Peace Corps volunteers and alumni for their service and I thank 

the Committee for its work to keep them safe and secure. 

65


92743g.eps
66


92743h.eps
67


92743i.eps
68


92743j.eps
69


92743k.eps
70


92743l.eps
71


92743m.eps
72


92743n.eps
73


92743o.eps
74


92743p.eps
75


92743q.eps
76


92743r.eps
77


92743s.eps
78


92743t.eps
79


92743u.eps
80


92743v.eps
81


92743w.eps
82


92743x.eps
83


92743y.eps
84


92743z.eps
85


92743aa.eps
86


92743ab.eps
87


92743ac.eps
88


92743ad.eps
89


92743ae.eps
90


92743af.eps
91


92743ag.eps
92


92743ah.eps
93


92743ai.eps
94


92743aj.eps
95


92743ak.eps
96


92743al.eps
97

Æ


92743am.eps