alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 3186.300 Whom in the IMLS does a recipient who is an individual notify about a criminal drug conviction?

A recipient who is an individual and is required under 2 CFR 182.300(b) to notify Federal agencies about a conviction for a criminal drug offense must notify each IMLS office from which it currently has an award.
Handbook 301 - UI PERFORMS: Benefits Timeliness & QualityNonmonetary Determinations Quality Review (Rev. Jan. 1998)

----

**TABLE OF CONTENTS**

**I. INTRODUCTION**

**II. SCOPE OF THE QUALITY REVIEW**

> 
**A. UI Programs Included in the Quality Review**

**B. Types of Determinations Sampled**

**C. Identifying Nonmonetary Issues**

**D. Elements to be Reviewed**

**III. PREPARING FOR THE REVIEW**

> 
**A. Sampling Frequency**

**B. Sample Frames**

**C. Sample Sizes**

**D. Sample Size Flexibility**

**E. Selecting and Identifying the Sampled Determinations**

**F. Validating the Sample**

**G. Assembling the Case Review File**

**IV. CONDUCTING THE REVIEW**

> 
**A. Tripartite Quality  Review System**

**1. Identifying Review Teams**

**2. Assigning Cases**

**3. Reviewing and Scoring Cases**

**4. Reconciling Scores**

**5. Automatic Calculation of Score**

**6. Retain All Case Reviews**

**7. Use of Sample Data**

**B. Completing the  Data Collection Instrument**

**V. THE DATA COLLECTION ELEMENTS**

> 
**1 - Identification #**

**2 - Issue Code**

**3 - Case Material Found?**

**4 - Correct Issue Code?**

**5 - Corrected Issue Code**

**6 - Intrastate Claim?**

**7 - Program Type**

**8 - Nonmonetary Determination Outcome****9 - Outcome Reported Correctly?**

> 
**10 - Reserved for SESA Use Only**

**11 - Week Claimed?**

**12 - Week Ending Date of First Week Affected**

**13 - Correct Week Ending Date?**

**14 - Corrected Week Ending Date**

**15 - Issue Detection Date**

**16 - Correct Issue Detection Date?**

**17 - Corrected Issue Detection Date**

> 
**Minimum Criteria to Satisfy  Reasonable Attempts Requirements**

> 
**18 - Claimant Information**

**19 - Employer Information**

**20 - Information (Facts) From Others**

**21 - Rebuttal Opportunity Provided**

**22 - Law and Policy Correctly Applied**

**23 - The Written Determination**

**24 - Appeal Information**

**25 - Date Determination Issued**

**26 - Determination Fully Implemented**

**27 - Date Determination Fully Implemented**

**The Comments Section**

**VI. GUIDE SHEETS:**

> 
**1. Voluntary Leaving**

**2. Discharge**

**3. Refusal of Work/Referral**

**4. Able and Available**

**5. Disqualifying/Other Deductible Income**

**6. Reporting Requirements**

**7. Alien Status**

**8. Educational Employees Between/Within Terms**

**9. Professional Athletes Between Seasons**

**10. Approved Training**

**11. Labor Disputes**

**12. Worker Profiling and Reemployment Services**

**VII. GLOSSARY**

**APPENDIX A: SAMPLE SELECTION**

**APPENDIX B: TRIPARTITE QUALITY REVIEW OPTIONS**

**NONMONETARY DETERMINATIONS QUALITY DATACOLLECTION INSTRUMENT**

**NONMONETARY DETERMINATIONS QUALITY DATA COLLECTIONINSTRUMENT- WITH HANDBOOK PAGE REFERENCES**
EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION

I, Brenda G. Gujral, President, certify that:

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Inland Monthly Income Fund, L.P.;

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and we have:

> - designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
- evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
- disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

> - all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
- any fraud, whether o *r* not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.
By: Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation

    General Partner

 

/S/ Brenda G. Gujral                                   

Name: Brenda G. GujralTitle: President of the General Partner and        Principal Executive Officer of Inland Monthly Income Fund, L.P
Date: August 11, 2003
Exhibit 23.2






                  INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements of Level 8 Systems, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-
12247) and Form S-3/A (File No. 333-22979) of our report dated
January 31, 1997, except for Note H, as to which the date is April
6, 1998, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Level
8 Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and for
each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 1996, which
report appears in this December 31, 1997, annual report on Form 10-
K/A of Level 8 Systems, Inc.




/s/ LURIE, BESIKOF, LAPIDUS & CO., LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
September 11, 1998
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 990 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the original authorization for use of force against Iraq contained in Public Law 107– 

243 is outdated and Congress should vote on a new use of force resolution that reflects the current situation in Iraq. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 7, 2006 

Ms. WATERS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on International Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

the original authorization for use of force against Iraq 

contained in Public Law 107–243 is outdated and Congress should vote on a new use of force resolution that 

reflects the current situation in Iraq. 

Whereas the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, were 

carried out by members of al-Qaeda, an international terrorist organization; 

Whereas, shortly after the 9–11 terrorist attacks, President 

Bush, Vice President Cheney, Secretary of Defense 

Rumsfeld, and others in the executive branch began talking of and planning for war with Iraq; 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 990 IH 

Whereas President Bush, Vice President Cheney, Secretary of 

Defense Rumsfeld, and others in the executive branch 

used multiple reasons to justify the war with Iraq, including an arsenal of weapons of mass destruction, ties to alQaeda, and harboring members of al-Qaeda; 

Whereas, in October 2002, the 107th Congress passed H.J. 

Res. 114, which became Public Law 107–243, authorizing the use of force against Iraq, stating that ‘‘Iraq 

both poses a continuing threat to the national security of 

the United States . . . by, among other things, continuing 

to possess and develop a significant chemical and biological weapons capability, actively seeking a nuclear weapons capability, and supporting and harboring terrorist organizations’’; 

Whereas with the authorization provided for by Public Law 

107–243, the United States went to war with Iraq on 

March 19, 2003; 

Whereas the government of Saddam Hussein fell in April 

2003 due to the military action of the United States; 

Whereas it is clear that none of the justifications for going 

to war with Iraq were accurate; 

Whereas many of the provisions of Public Law 107–243, 

which were based on the erroneous claims, were also 

false; 

Whereas since the invasion of Iraq by the United States, Iraq 

has descended into civil war, resulting in the deaths of 

tens of thousands of Iraqis; and 

Whereas the terms of Public Law 107–243 are no longer applicable to the current military action in Iraq: Now, 

therefore, be it 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 990 IH 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that— 

3 (1) the original authorization for use of force 

4 against Iraq contained in Public Law 107–243 is 

5 outdated; and 

6 (2) Congress should vote on a new use of force 

7 resolution that reflects the current situation in Iraq. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
# m8922.docx

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels,22.6.2018 C(2018) 4046 final To the notifying party : Subject : Case M. 8922 - PHOENIX PIB AUSTRIA / FARMEXIM AND HELP NET FARMA Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1 )( b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 1 and Article 57 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area 2 Dear Sir or Madam, 1. On 30 May 2018 , the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which Phoenix PIB Austria Beteiligungs GmbH (Austria) ("Phoenix") "), belonging to the Phoenix companies group, a cquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Farmexim SA, Romania (" Farmexim "), and Help Net Farma SA, Romania ("Help Net") by way of purchase of shares . 3 2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are: - Phoenix Group : a pharmaceutical wholesale , pharmacy retail and related pharma services provider in Europe; - Farmexim : a full-line wholesaler of pharmaceutical products; - Help Net : operator of a chain of pharmacies in Romania. 3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5 ( c ) and 6 of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 . 4 4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1 )( b) of the Merger Regulation and Article 57 of the EEA Agreement . For the Commission (Signed) Johannes LAITENBERGER Director - General
(1)
OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ( the ' Merger Regulation ' ). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( ' TFEU ' ) has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of ' Community ' by ' Union ' and ' common market ' by ' internal market ' . The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.
(2) OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3 ( the ' EEA Agreement ' ).
(3) Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 196 , 08.06.2018 , p. 34 .
(4)
OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5 .
#### § 1.916 When will we consider whether to waive a requirement of this subpart?

We will consider whether to waive a requirement of this subpart on our own initiative or on the petition submitted under § 10.30 of this chapter by any person who is subject to the requirements of this subpart with respect to any class of persons, vehicles, food, or nonfood products.
###### Editorial Note on [Part 131](/current/title-21/part-131?toc=1)

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 131 appear at [63 FR 14035](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/63-FR-14035), Mar. 24, 1998.

#### § 131.3 Definitions.

(a) *Cream* means the liquid milk product high in fat separated from milk, which may have been adjusted by adding thereto: Milk, concentrated milk, dry whole milk, skim milk, concentrated skim milk, or nonfat dry milk. Cream contains not less than 18 percent milkfat.

(b) *Pasteurized* when used to describe a dairy product means that every particle of such product shall have been heated in properly operated equipment to one of the temperatures specified in the table of this paragraph and held continuously at or above that temperature for the specified time (or other time/temperature relationship which has been demonstrated to be equivalent thereto in microbial destruction):

| Temperature | Time |
| --- | --- |
| 145 °F1 | 30 minutes |
| 161 °F1 | 15 seconds |
| 191 °F | 1 second |
| 204 °F | 0.05 second |
| 212 °F | 0.01 second |
| | |
| --- | --- |
| 1 If the dairy ingredient has a fat content of 10 percent or more, or if it contains added sweeteners, the specified temperature shall be increased by 5 °F. | |

(c) *Ultra-pasteurized* when used to describe a dairy product means that such product shall have been thermally processed at or above 280 °F for at least 2 seconds, either before or after packaging, so as to produce a product which has an extended shelf life under refrigerated conditions.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         217,241
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,947
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  1,187,662
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      1,573,238
<ALLOWANCE>                                     35,747
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,663,771
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,994,662
<SHORT-TERM>                                   307,199
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            705,003
<LONG-TERM>                                    324,607
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        26,374
<OTHER-SE>                                     305,926
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               3,663,771
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 89,137
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               35,977
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 4,433
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               129,547
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              54,211
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              79,170
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           50,377
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    8,790
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               2,544
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                130,349
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (23,528)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                    (23,528)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,585)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.44)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.44)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.17
<LOANS-NON>                                     15,873
<LOANS-PAST>                                    17,359
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                33,834
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    8,680
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,803
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               35,747
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            35,747
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
<FN>
<F1>FOR PURPOSES OF THIS EXHIBIT, PRIMARY MEANS BASIC.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# EUR-Lex - 31988R4045 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31988R4045

**Council Regulation (ECSC, EEC, Euratom) No 4045/88 of 19 December 1988 laying down the emoluments of the President, Members and Registrar of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities **

*
Official Journal L 356 , 24/12/1988 P. 0001 - 0001 Finnish special edition: Chapter 1 Volume 2 P. 0098 Swedish special edition: Chapter 1 Volume 2 P. 0098 *

COUNCIL REGULATION (ECSC, EEC, EURATOM) No 4045/88 of 19 December 1988 laying down the emoluments of the President, Members and Registrar of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to Council Decision 88/591/ECSC, EEC, Euratom of 24 October 1988 establishing a Court of First Instance of the European Communities (1), and in particular Article 2 (5) thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing a Single Council and a Single Commission of the European Communities, and in particle Article 6 thereof,

Whereas, by the abovementioned Decision, the Council attached to the Court of Justice a Court of First Instance charged with exercising important judicial functions;

Whereas it is necessary to determine the salaries, pensions and any payment to be made instead of remuneration of the President, members and the Registrar of the Court of First Instance;

Whereas it is accordingly necessary to amend Council Regulation No 422/67/EEC, No 5/67/Euratom of 25 July 1967 determining the emoluments of the President and members of the Commission and of the President, Judges, Advocates-General and Registrar of the Court of Justice (2), as last amended by Regulation (Euratom, ECSC, EEC) No 3875/87 (3),

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Sole Article Regulation No 422/67/EEC, No 5/67/Euratom is hereby amended as follows:

1. The following words shall be added to the title:

 ́and of the President, Members and Registrar of the Court of First Instance'.

2. The following Article shall be inserted:

 ́Article 21a 1. Subject to paragraph 2 and 3, the provisions of this Regulation concerning the President, Members and the Registrar of the Court of Justice shall apply to the President, Members and Registrar of the Court of First Instance.

2. The basic monthly salary of the President, Members and Registrar of the Court of First Instance shall be equal to the amount resulting from application of the following percentages to the basic salary of an official of the European Communities on the last step of grade A 1:

President: 112,5 %,

Members: 104 %,

Registrar: 95 %.

3. The monthly entertainment allowance referred to in Article 4 (3) shall amount to:

President: Bfrs 21 015,

Members: Bfrs 19 170,

Registrar: Bfrs 16 299.

Presiding Judges of the Chambers of the Court shall in addition receive, during their term of office, a special duty allowance of Bfrs 25 573 per month.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 December 1988.

For the Council The President Th. PANGALOS (1) OJ No L 319, 25. 11. 1988, p. 1.

(2) OJ No 187, 8. 8. 1967, p. 1.

(3) OJ No L 363, 23. 12. 1987, p. 66.
Order filed, April 25, 2012

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 12

- 00366

- CV

____________ R.V. Brothers Inc. aka R.V. Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a V & J Trucking, Appellant

V.
Paramjjit Singh Toor and Kulwant Singh Nagra, Appe llee

On Appeal from the 253rd District Court Chambers County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CV24773



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due March 6, 2012

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for fil ing the record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order
, the Official Court Reporter of the 253rd District Court
, to file the
record in this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order

. PER CURIAM
Certificate of Adjustment to Purchase Price & Redemption Price


    

      CERTIFICATE
        OF ADJUSTMENT

      TO
        PURCHASE PRICE AND REDEMPTION PRICE

      as
        amended and restated

      pursuant
        to the Rights Agreement, dated as of November 12, 1998

      (“Rights
        Agreement”), between MDU Resources Group, Inc.

      and
        Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (f/k/a Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, N.A.), Rights
        Agent

      


      


      The
        undersigned, MDU Resources Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),
        does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 12 of the Rights Agreement,
        that:

      


      	·  	
              on
                July 26, 2006 (the “Effective Date”), for shareholders of record on July
                12, 2006, the Company split its common stock, $1.00 per share, and
                the
                preference share purchase rights appurtenant thereto (“Common Stock”), on
                a three-for-two basis (“Stock Split”); 

            


      


      	·  	
              
                pursuant
                  to Section 11(n) of the Rights Agreement, as of the Effective Date,
                  each
                  holder of a Right (as defined in the Rights Agreement) will have
                  the right
                  to purchase from the Company four-ninths of one one-thousandths
                  of a share
                  of Series B Preference Stock, without par value, of the Company,
                  at a
                  purchase price of $125 per one one-thousandths of a share of Series
                  B
                  Preference Stock; and

              

            


      


      	·  	
              pursuant
                to Section 23(a) of the Rights Agreement, as of the Effective Date,
                each
                Right shall be redeemable by the Company at a redemption price of
                $.00444
                per Right.

            


      


      This
        adjustment to the Rights Agreement is the result of this Stock Split and
        a
        similar three-for-two stock split in 2003. This Certificate of Adjustment
        to
        Purchase Price and Redemption Price amends and restates the Certificate of
        Amendment to Purchase Price and Redemption Price, dated October 29, 2003,
        as
        amended and restated, on February 2, 2004.

      


      IN
        WITNESS WHEREOF,
        this
        certificate has been duly executed on July 26, 2006.

      


      MDU
        RESOURCES GROUP, INC.

      


      


      By:
        /s/
        VERNON A. RAILE

                          Vernon
        A.
        Raile

                          Executive
        Vice
        President, Treasurer

          and
        Chief
        Financial Officer