alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 06-14-00195-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT TEXARKANA, TEXAS

JERRY LEON MCNEIL, 

Appellant

VS. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

Appellee

TO SAID HONORABLE COURT:

MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT

James P. Finstrom, appointed counsel for Jerry Leon McNeil, 

Appellant, moves the Court to allow him to withdraw from 

representation of Appellant in this cause and shows the Court that he 

tried this case and has examined the record in this cause and is of 

the opinion that the appeal is without merit on direct appeal and that 

there are no grounds which would arguably support reversal of this 

conviction on direct appeal and, further, is of the opinion that 

Appellant’s pleas of true to allegations numbered three and four in the 

State’s Petition to Revoke Probated Judgment in this cause together 

ACCEPTED

06-14-00195

SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

TEXARKANA, TEXAS

1/15/2015 8:47:40 AM

DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK

 FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 1/15/2015 2:44:00 PM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk
with his judicial confession when he entered his plea of guilty in this 

cause are wholly sufficient to support the order of the trial court 

revoking his probation. 

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, counsel for 

Appellant moves that he be permitted to withdraw from representation 

in this cause. 

Respectfully submitted, 

__/s/ James P. Finstrom_

James P. Finstrom 

Counsel for Appellant

202 S. Marshall, 

P.O. Box 276

Jefferson, Texas 75657

903-665-7111

Fax: 903-665-7167

Texas Bar #07038000

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that I have delivered a true copy of this brief to Hon.

Angela Smoak, counsel for the State, on this 15th day of January, 

2015. 

__/s/ James P. Finstrom___

James P. Finstrom 

2
Editorial Note on Part 9
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 9 appear at 82 FR 52825, Nov. 15, 2017.

§ 9.19 Segregation of exempt information and deletion of identifying details. ( a ) For records required to be made available under 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(2), the NRC shall delete information that is exempt under one or more of the exemptions cited in § 9.17. The amount of information deleted will be indicated on the released portion of the record, unless providing this indication would harm an interest protected by the exemption(s) under which the matter has been withheld.
( b ) In responding to a request for information submitted under § 9.23, in which it has been determined to withhold exempt information, the NRC shall segregate— ( 1 ) Information that is exempt from public disclosure under § 9.17 from nonexempt information; and
( 2 ) Factual information from advice, opinions, and recommendations in predecisional records unless the information is inextricably intertwined, or is contained in drafts, legal work products, and records covered by the lawyer-client privilege, or is otherwise exempt from disclosure.
( c ) In denying a request for records, in whole or in part, NRC will make a reasonable effort to estimate the volume of any information requested that is denied and provide the estimate to the person making the request, unless providing the estimate would harm an interest protected by the exemption(s) under which the information has been denied.
( d ) When entire records or portions thereof are denied and deletions are made from parts of the record by computer, the amount of information deleted will be indicated on the released portion of the record, unless providing this indication would harm an interest protected by the exemption(s) under which the matter has been denied.
[63 FR 2876, Jan. 20, 1998, as amended at 81 FR 96346, Dec. 30, 2016]
### Served: Ju ly 10 , 201 3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation on the 10 th of July , 2013 Essential Air Service at PADUCAH, KENTUCKY HANCOCK/HOUGHTON, MICH IGAN MUSKEGON, MICHIGAN PELLSTON, MICHIGAN SAULT STE. MARIE, MICHIGAN WATERTOWN, NEW YORK EAU CLARIE, WISCONSIN Under 49 U.S.C. 41731 et seq . DOCKET DOT - OST - 2009 - 0299 DOCKET DOT - OST - 2009 - 0302 DOCKET DOT - OST - 2009 - 0301 DOCKET DOT - OST - 2011 - 0133 DOCKET DOT - OST - 2009 - 0303 DOCKET DOT - OST - 1997 - 2842 DOCKET DOT - OST - 2009 - 0306

NOTICE OF EXTENSION FOR PROPOSALS AT PADUCAH, KENTUCKY; HANCOCK/HOUGHTON, MUSKEGON, PELLSTON, AND SAULT STE. MARIE,

MICHIGAN; WATERTOWN, NEW YORK; AND EAU CLAIRE, WISCONSIN By Order 201 3

- 5

- 13 , May 21 , 2013, the Department requested proposals for Ess e ntial Air Service at the above captioned communities, with proposals due no later than June 26, 2013. On June 26, American Airlines requested a two

- week extension to July 10, and we grant ed that extension. On July 10, American requested an additional short

- term extension. We will grant the ir request. Proposals at the seven communities listed above are now due on July 1 5 , 201 3

.

Dennis DeVany, Chief, EAS and Domestic Analysis An el ectronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at http://www.regulations.gov
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Paulino BAUTISTA-SANCHEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 03-41526.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Oct. 17, 2005.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Lourdes Rodriguez, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JONES, BARKSDALE, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Paulino Bautista-Sanchez pleaded guilty and was convicted of illegal reentry following deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to his guilty-plea conviction, the district court sentenced Bautis-ta-Sanchez to sixty-eight months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release. This Court affirmed Bautista-Sanchez’s judgment of conviction. *United States v. Bautista-Sanchez,*116 F. App’x. 512 (5th Cir.2004). Bautista-Sanchez filed a petition for a writ of certiorari. The Supreme Court granted Bautista-Sanchez’s petition, vacated this Court’s judgment, and remanded the case for consideration in light of *United States v. Booker,*— U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). *Bautista-Sanchez v. United States,*— U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 1715, 161 L.Ed.2d 521 (2005). Bautista-Sanchez does not now press a *Booker*claim, conceding that *Booker*has no impact on this appeal.

We reinstate our prior judgment affirming Bautista-Sanchez’s sentence.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

### ***CERTIFICATIONUNDER SECTION 906 OF THE***

### ***SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002***

### *** ***

Theundersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Systemax Inc., hereby certifiesthat to the best of his knowledge Systemax Inc.’s Form 10-K for the YearEnded December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78mor 78 (o)(d)) and that the information contained in such Form 10-K fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of Systemax Inc.

 

 

 
| Dated:  March 13,  2008         |   |
|------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                           |   |
| /s/  LAWRENCE P. REINHOLD                      |   |
| Lawrence  P. Reinhold, Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
# Annual Reports

Every year since 1974, the Marine Mammal Commission has published an annual report highlighting our projects, activities and accomplishments for the previous year. Our annual reports are one of several publications that we release on an annual basis to highlight our work and the most pressing issues impacting marine mammals and their environment. In 2013 we redesigned our annual report into a shorter one-page summary document. The new annual report was designed primarily for electronic distribution and use, directing the reader to relevant sections of our website for additional information.

A humpback whale and its calf in NOAA’s Hawaiian Islands Humpback Whale National Marine Sanctuary. (NOAA)

Annual reports from 2010-present are available below for download. If you wish to request a copy of an annual report prior to 2010, please contact us at mmc@mmc.gov.

***Note:*** Download times of large PDFs will vary based on connection speed. Additional information on PDFs.

2023 Annual Report

Highlights include efforts to oversee legal and policy decisions under the MMPA; to engage communities and stakeholders; to reduce marine mammal bycatch domestically and overseas; to continue funding novel, low-cost, small-scale research projects to catalyze future work;  to provide ongoing technical and funding support international conservation of marine mammals; and to emphasize the use of science-based decision making.

2022 Annual Report

Highlights include efforts to oversee legal and policy decisions under the MMPA; to engage communities and stakeholders; to reduce marine mammal bycatch domestically and overseas; to continue funding novel, low-cost, small-scale research projects to catalyze future work;  to provide ongoing technical and funding support international conservation of marine mammals; and to emphasize the use of science-based decision making.

2021 Annual Report

Highlights include efforts to oversee legal and policy decisions under the MMPA; to engage communities and stakeholders; to reduce marine mammal bycatch domestically and overseas; to continue funding novel, low-cost, small-scale research projects to catalyze future work;  to provide ongoing technical and funding support international conservation of marine mammals; and to emphasize the use of science-based decision making.

2020 Annual Report

Highlights include efforts to oversee legal and policy decisions under the MMPA; to engage communities and stakeholders; to reduce marine mammal bycatch domestically and overseas; to continue funding novel, low-cost, small-scale research projects to catalyze future work;  to provide ongoing technical and funding support international conservation of marine mammals; and to emphasize the use of science-based decision making.

2019 Annual Report

2018 Annual Report

2017 Annual Report

2016 Annual Report

2015 Annual Report

2014 Annual Report

2013 Annual Report

2012 Annual Report

2010–2011 Annual Report
§ 910.517 Audit documentation. ( a ) *Retention of audit documentation.* The auditor must retain audit documentation and reports for a minimum of three years after the date of issuance of the auditor's report(s) to the auditee, unless the auditor is notified in writing by DOE or the cognizant agency for indirect costs to extend the retention period. When the auditor is aware that the Federal agency or auditee is contesting an audit finding, the auditor must contact the parties contesting the audit finding for guidance prior to destruction of the audit documentation and reports.
( b ) *Access to audit documentation.* Audit documentation must be made available upon request to the cognizant agency for indirect cost, DOE, or GAO at the completion of the audit, as part of a quality review, to resolve audit findings, or to carry out oversight responsibilities consistent with the purposes of this Part. Access to audit documentation includes the right of Federal agencies to obtain copies of audit documentation, as is reasonable and necessary.
# m8686.docx

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 18.1.2018 C(2018) 408 final To the notifying parties Subject : Case M . 8686 – BUNGE / IOI / LODERS Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 1 and Article 57 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area 2 Dear Sir or Madam, 1. On 18 December 2017 , the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which the undertakings Koninklijke Bunge B.V. (Bunge) (The Netherlands), a subsidiary of Bunge Limited , and IOI Corporation Berhad (IOI) (Malaysia), a public company limited by shares and listed on the Main Market of Bursa Malaysia Securities Berhad , acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control over the whole of the undertaking Loders Croklaan Group B.V. ( Loders ) (The Netherlands), belonging to the IOI group , by way of purchase of shares . 3 2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are: - Bunge: is a US listed group operating in the agri -food sector. Its main activities include trading in oil seeds and cereal, grains, seed pressing and the production and marketing of edible oils. - IOI: is a Malaysian conglomerate active, amongst others, as a vertically integrated palm oil producer owning and operating palm oil plantations in Malaysia and Indonesia. - Loders : is the downstream edible oils & fats business of IOI operating refining and fractionation facilities in the US, the Netherlands, and Malaysia. Loders produces and supplies high-end semi-specialty and specialty edible oils and fats to industry customers in more than 100 countries worldwide. 3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5 ( c ) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 . 4 4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation and Article 57 of the EEA Agreement . For the Commission (S igned )
Johannes LAITENBERGER Director - General

(1)
OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ( the ' Merger Regulation ' ). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( ' TFEU ' ) has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of ' Community ' by ' Union ' and ' common market ' by ' internal market ' . The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.
(2) OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3 ( the ' EEA Agreement ' ).
(3) Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 1 , 04.1.2018 , p. 9 .
(4)
OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5 .
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEMELE GROUP
INC.'S FORM 10QSB FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10QSB.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       6,329,310
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,143,808
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,701,049
<PP&E>                                      10,336,991
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              28,704,134
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,217,141
<BONDS>                                     15,782,456
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       11,529,948
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                28,704,134
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               373,338
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,584,649
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,211,311)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,211,311)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,211,311)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.01)
        

</TABLE>
§ 169.179 Vanilla powder. ( a ) Vanilla powder is a mixture of ground vanilla beans or vanilla oleoresin or both, with one or more of the following optional blending ingredients: ( 1 ) Sugar.
( 2 ) Dextrose.
( 3 ) Lactose.
( 4 ) Food starch (including food starch-modified as prescribed in § 172.892 of this chapter).
( 5 ) Dried corn sirup.
( 6 ) Gum acacia. Vanilla powder may contain one or any mixture of two or more of the anticaking ingredients specified in paragraph (b) of this section, but the total weight of any such ingredient or mixture is not more than 2 percent of the weight of the finished vanilla powder. Vanilla powder contains in each 8 pounds not less than one unit of vanilla constituent, as defined in § 169.3(c).
( b ) The anticaking ingredients referred to in paragraph (a) of this section are: ( 1 ) Aluminum calcium silicate.
( 2 ) Calcium silicate.
( 3 ) Calcium stearate.
( 4 ) Magnesium silicate.
( 5 ) Tricalcium phosphate.
( c ) ( 1 ) The specified name of the food is “Vanilla powder __-fold” or “__-fold vanilla powder”, except that if sugar is the optional blending ingredient used, the word “sugar” may replace the word “powder”. The blank in the name is filled in with the whole number (disregarding fractions) expressing the number of units of vanilla constituent per 8 pounds of the article. However, if the strength of the article is less than 2-fold, the term “__-fold” is omitted from the name.
( 2 ) The label of vanilla powder shall bear the common names of any of the optional ingredients specified in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section that are used, except that where the alternative name “Vanilla sugar” is used for designating the food it is not required that sugar be named as an optional ingredient.
( 3 ) Wherever the name of the food appears on the label so conspicuously as to be easily seen under customary conditions of purchase, the labeling required by paragraph (c)(2) of this section shall immediately and conspicuously precede or follow such name, without intervening written, printed, or graphic matter.
( d ) *Label declaration.* Each of the ingredients used in the food shall be declared on the label as required by the applicable sections of parts 101 and 130 of this chapter.
[42 FR 14479, Mar. 15, 1977, as amended at 58 FR 2887, Jan. 6, 1993]
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Brian E. Schaaf, certify that:

 

1.                                    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ford Credit Auto Lease Trust 2013-A (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.                                    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.                                    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.                                    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York Mellon, as indenture trustee of the issuing entity, and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as owner trustee of the issuing entity.

 
| Dated   March 28, 2014 |   |                                               |
|-----------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                        |   |                                               |
|                        |   |                                               |
|                        |   | /s/   Brian E. Schaaf                              |
|                        |   | Brian   E. Schaaf                                  |
|                        |   | Vice   President and Assistant Treasurer           |
|                        |   | Ford   Motor Credit Company LLC, as Servicer       |
|                        |   | (senior   officer in charge of servicing function) |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,599
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,386
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,342
<INVENTORY>                                      1,467
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,739
<PP&E>                                           3,578
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,195
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,122
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,948
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                         168
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,122
<SALES>                                          1,744
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,668
<CGS>                                              940
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,330
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,487
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 215
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (325)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (325)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (325)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)
        

</TABLE>