alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hutton Investors Futures Fund L.P. II (the ‘‘Partnership’’) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Jerry Pascucci, President and Director of Citigroup Managed Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                      
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

| |     |                                                                                                                                                         
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

/s/ Jerry Pascucci
Jerry Pascucci
Citigroup Managed Futures LLC
President and Director

Date:November 14, 2007

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 13, 2016

Order 

Clerk

May 13, 2016

151719(60)

DANIEL KEMP,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

SC: 151719

v COA: 319796

Wayne CC: 13-008264-NF

FARM BUREAU GENERAL INSURANCE

COMPANY OF MICHIGAN,

Defendant-Appellee.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of amicus curiae Coalition Protecting 

Auto No-Fault to extend the time for filing an amicus brief is GRANTED. The amicus 

brief will be accepted for filing if submitted on or before June 3, 2016.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          23,210
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               348,690
<PP&E>                                         120,696
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,560
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,614,807
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          869,020
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           961
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,522,604
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,614,807
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,933,703
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              40,734
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,974,437)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,974,437)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,974,437)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.33)
        

</TABLE>
2006 Director Compensation Package



 Exhibit 10.1 
 2006 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PACKAGE 
 On March 31, 2006, the Board of Directors of Radiant Systems, Inc.
(the “Company”) approved a new compensation package for the members of the Board of Directors and its committees that will be retroactive to January 1, 2006. 
 Each non-employee director will be paid an annual retainer of $20,000. A $10,000 annual retainer will be paid to the Audit Committee Chairman and a $5,000 annual retainer will be paid to the Chairman of any committee
other than the Audit Committee. An annual retainer of $5,000 will be paid to each Audit Committee member other than the Chairman. All cash retainers shall be paid quarterly beginning April 1, 2006. 
 Each non-employee director of the Company will receive an annual grant of options to purchase 10,000 shares of the Company’s common stock on the last business day
of each fiscal year of the Company. In addition, all new non-employee directors of the Company receive a one-time grant of an option to purchase 25,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of
the stock on the date of grant, which options vest over a period of three years. All such options expire, unless previously exercised or terminated, ten years from the date of grant.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6781

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WENLEY MCCLAREN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. W. Craig Broadwater, District

Judge. (CR-90-7, CA-95-24-3)

Submitted: August 15, 2000 Decided: August 25, 2000

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wenley McClaren, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant

United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
1 Contrary to McClaren’s argument on appeal the certificate of

appealability requirement applies to this appeal. See Slack v.

McDaniel, U.S. , 68 U.S.L.W. 4315, 4317 (U.S. Apr. 26, 2000)

(No. 98-6322).

2 Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on

May 12, 2000, the district court’s records show that it was entered

on the docket sheet on May 19, 2000. Pursuant to Rules 58 and

79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that

the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the

effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v.

Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Wenley McClaren seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

memorandum opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court.1 See United States v. McClaren,

Nos. CR-90-7; CA-95-24-3 (N.D.W. Va. May 19, 2000).2 We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Editorial Note on Part 112
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 112 appear at 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 112.166 What requirements apply for making records available and accessible to FDA? ( a ) You must have all records required under this part readily available and accessible during the retention period for inspection and copying by FDA upon oral or written request, except that you have 24 hours to obtain records you keep offsite and make them available and accessible to FDA for inspection and copying.
( b ) If you use electronic techniques to keep records, or to keep true copies of records, or if you use reduction techniques such as microfilm to keep true copies of records, you must provide the records to FDA in a format in which they are accessible and legible.
( c ) If your farm is closed for a prolonged period, the records may be transferred to some other reasonably accessible location but must be returned to your farm within 24 hours for official review upon request.
June 29, 2011

Docket Section Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey

Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Re: Intra - Alaska Bush Service Mail Rate, Docket 14694 On behalf of the Consolidated Carriers, I request an extension of the time to file r esponses to Order 2011 - 6 - 14 until Monday , July 18, 2011. The Carriers are working with a statistician to develop models that may have a better correlation than the 72% rate of the current rate. A 72% correlation explains less than half of the variation f rom the mean, and does not account for known variances such as aircraft capacity . The long holiday weekend makes it impossible to complete the anal ys is before July 7. This short extension will not affect the rights or position of any party , and will deve lop a more complete record. I certify that I have served a copy of this letter upon all parties to Docket 14694 by electronic mail. Respectfully

submitted, Hank M yers

PO Box 7142 Bellevue, WA 98008 - 1142 ● (425) 830 - 4265 ● hank@mtcworld.com
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM JASON
INCORPORATED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT MARCH 27, 1998, AND CONSOLIDATED
INCOME STATEMENT FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 27, 1998. AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000813471
<NAME> JASON INCORPORATED
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-25-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-27-1998
<CASH>                                           3,064
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   74,644
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                     44,659
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               149,842
<PP&E>                                         193,280
<DEPRECIATION>                                  95,475
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 341,826
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          120,994
<BONDS>                                         87,892<F2>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        35,064
<OTHER-SE>                                      75,776
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   341,826
<SALES>                                        120,865
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               120,865
<CGS>                                           95,412
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   95,412
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,940
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,912
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,306
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,606
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,606
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .18<F3>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .17
<FN>
<F1>COMPANY PRESENTS RECEIVABLES ON A NET BASIS IN COMPLIANCE WITH ARTICLE 10
REGULATION S-X.
<F2>INCLUDES ALL NON-CURRENT PORTION OF DEBT OBLIGATIONS.
<F3>THE EPS UNDER THE EPS PRIMARY TAG REPRESENTS BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING STANDARD NO. 128 EARNINGS PER
SHARE.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
§ 1500.10 General procurement standards. ( a ) EPA will limit its participation in the salary rate (excluding overhead) paid to individual consultants retained by recipients, and their contractors or subcontractors to the maximum daily rate for level 4 of the Executive Schedule unless a greater amount is authorized by law. (These non-Federal entities may, however, pay consultants more than this amount with non-EPA funds.) The limitation in this paragraph (a) applies to consultation services of designated individuals with specialized skills who are paid at a daily or hourly rate. This rate does not include transportation and subsistence costs for travel performed; recipients will pay these in accordance with their normal travel reimbursement practices.
( b ) All contracts between recipients and subrecipients and individual consultants are subject to the procurement standards in subpart D of 2 CFR part 200. Contracts or subcontracts with multi-employee firms for consulting services are not affected by the limitation in paragraph (a) of this section provided the contractor or subcontractor rather than the recipient or subrecipient selects, directs and controls individual employees providing consulting services.
( c ) Borrowers under EPA revolving loan fund capitalization grant programs are not subject to paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section.
[85 FR 61574, Sept. 30, 2020]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
ART. 5 FDS for third quarter 1998 10-q
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  120,690
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,985
<INVENTORY>                                    186,306
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               306,067
<PP&E>                                       1,256,400
<DEPRECIATION>                                 382,558
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,455,088
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          155,052
<BONDS>                                        500,721
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            34
<OTHER-SE>                                     669,433
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,455,088
<SALES>                                        761,373
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               761,373
<CGS>                                          643,989
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  643,989
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                55,940
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,610
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 54,834
<INCOME-TAX>                                    20,014
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             34,820
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    34,820
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.11
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned, Kevin G. Wills, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Saks Incorporated (the
Company), has executed this certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 5, 2007 (the Report).

The undersigned hereby certifies that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 6th day of June, 2007.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Kevin G. Wills                                  
|Kevin G. Wills                                      
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Saks Incorporated
and will be retained by Saks Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 801.1113 Appeal.

Where the decision is made to affirm all or a portion of the remaining period of exclusion, any participant desiring an appeal shall file a written request for a hearing with the Under Secretary for Benefits, Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420. This request shall be filed within 30 days of receipt of the decision to affirm. If a hearing is requested, it shall be held in accordance with the procedures in §§ 108.825 through 108.855. Where a limited denial of participation is followed by a suspension or debarment, the limited denial of participation shall be superseded and the appeal shall be heard solely as an appeal of the suspension or debarment.
#### Afshin SAHIMI, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 02-74356.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 11, 2005.*

Decided Oct. 18, 2005.

Afshin Sahimi, Encino, CA, pro se.

District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, San Francisco, CA, Thankful T. Vanderstar, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: T.G. NELSON, TALLMAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Afshin Sahimi, a native of Iran and citizen of Israel, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) summary affirmance of an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his applica*533tion for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review whether Sahimi has demonstrated the requisite “exceptional and extremely unusual hardship” for cancellation of removal, *see Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft,*327 F.3d 887, 890 (9th Cir.2003), as well as whether the BIA improperly streamlined this appeal in which only the hardship element, a discretionary factor, is in dispute, *see Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft,*350 F.3d 845, 852-55 (9th Cir.2003).

Sahimi’s contention that his due process rights were violated when the IJ “failed to consider the pertinent testimony and documentary evidence submitted,” mistook facts and misapplied the law, is not supported by the record and therefore does not raise a colorable due process challenge. *See Torres-Aguilar v. INS,*246 F.3d 1267, 1271 (9th Cir.2001) (“To be colorable ... the claim must have some possible validity”); *Ortiz v. INS,*179 F.3d 1148, 1153 (9th Cir.1999) (“Due process challenges to deportation proceedings require a showing of prejudice to succeed.”).

The voluntary departure period was stayed, and that stay will expire upon issuance of the mandate. *See Desta v. Ashcroft,*365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Order entered October 28 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 14
- 00345
- CR
LAANGELO TERRELL WOO DS, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Tri al Court Cause No. F12
- 59224
- V



### O RDER
The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations and determine whether a ppellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8( b ). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the trial c ourt shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.

– Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effec tive representation, which may include appointment of new counsel.We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order. Thi s appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, whichever is earlier. /s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 24-0132

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

vs. 

JARED GLENN BARTH,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including November 13, 2024, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 2 2024

10/02/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0132