alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### JOHN M. HITE v. THE UNITED STATES.

[41 C. Cls. R., 256; 204 U. S. R., 343.]

*On the*defendants’ *Appeal.*

The act 4th May, 1898, authorizes the President, in case of an exigency, to appoint officers from civil life to serve “ *only during the continuance of the exigency under which their services are required in the existing ioar."*The President appoints the claimant as assistant engineer in the Navy. He serves at sea during the war with Spain beyond the limits of the United States. After the war ends by the signature of the treaty of Paris he is detached from his vessel and ordered to his home, and in five days is discharged. The question in the ease is whether he was entitled to his two months’ extra pay as sea pay or as waiting-orders pay.

The court below decides :

1. An engineer in the Navy appointed to serve only during the exigency of the war with Spain under the *Act J/th May, 1S9S*(30 Stat. U., p. 369), who was detached from his vessel after the treaty of Paris and ordered to his home preparatory to his discharge was entitled to two months’ extra sea pay.-

*5272. To hold that an officer detached from his vessel and ordered to . his home to be discharged five days later was only entitled to waiting-orders pay would be too narrow a construction of the *Act 2(1 March, 1899*(30 Stat. L., p. 1228), to carry out and effect the intent of Congress.

3. As the two months’ extra pay was given because of creditable service beyond the limits.of the United States during the war with'Spain, officers so serving became entitled upon discharge to the same pay which they were receiving when their services ceased.

The decision of the court below is affirmed on the same grounds.

February 25, 1907.

Mr. Chief Justice Fuller

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6519
GEORGE E. CARTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; HARLEY LAPPIN, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons; HARRELLWATTS, Administrator, National Inmate AppealFBOP; KIM WHITE, Regional Director, MidAtlantic Regional Office; K. J. WENDT, Warden, FCI-Gilmer; DUANE BROWN, Record Office Staff,FCI-Gilmer; D. MCADAMS, Unit Manager, FCIGilmer; JANE DOE, (Mrs. Whitlock) Case Manager, FCI-Gilmer, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Chief District Judge. (1:05-cv-00130) Submitted: October 12, 2007 Decided: October 22, 2007 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George E. Carter, Appellant Pro Se. Alan Gordon McGonigal, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees.- 2 - Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 3 - PER CURIAM: George E. Carter appeals the district court order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, granting summary judgment to Defendants on Carter’s civil action, and dismissing Carter’s complaint with prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Carter v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons , No. 1:05-cv-00130 (N.D. W. Va. Mar. 20, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-2419

In re: JANISON VEAL, a/k/a Jason,

 Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

(No. 3:02-cr-00043-JPB-JES-1)

Submitted: January 17, 2013 Decided: January 22, 2013

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Janison Veal, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Janison Veal petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking 

an order compelling the district court to append its findings of 

fact from Veal’s first resentencing to the presentence report 

provided to the Bureau of Prisons. We conclude that Veal is not 

entitled to mandamus relief.

Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used 

only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. United States 

Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v. 

Moussaoui, 333 F.3d 509, 516-17 (4th Cir. 2003). Further, 

mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a 

clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan 

Ass’n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Mandamus may not be 

used as a substitute for appeal. In re Lockheed Martin Corp., 

503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007). 

The relief sought by Veal is not available by way of 

mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1561
PETER HRONEK, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:06-cv-00492-RDB) Submitted: September 26, 2006 De cided: September 28, 2006 Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Peter Hronek, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Peter Hronek appeals the district court’s order granting his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and sua sponte dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hronek v. Maryland , No. 1:06-cv-00492-RDB (D. Md., Apr. 6, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF SYSTEMAX INC.DOMESTIC SUBSIDIARIES

1.          Global ComputerSupplies Inc. ( a New York corporation)

2.          Dartek Corp. ( aDelaware corporation)

3.          Nexel IndustriesInc. ( a New York corporation)

4.          Misco America Inc.( a Delaware corporation)

5.          Tiger Direct Inc.( a Florida corporation)

6.          SystemaxManufacturing Company Inc. ( a Delaware corporation)

7.          Systemax RetailSales Inc. ( a Delaware corporation)

FOREIGN SUBSIDIARIES

1.          Misco Germany Inc.( a New York corporation)

2.          Misco ItalyComputer Supplies S.P.A. ( an Italian corporation)

3.          H C S Global SA (a French corporation)

4.          Systemax EuropeLtd. ( a U.K. corporation)
Exhibit 32

Certification of Periodic Financial Report

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
each of the undersigned officers of AMCOL International Corporation (the Company) certifies that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |  |  |                                           
|------------------ |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------
|Date: May 06, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/ Ryan F.
McKendrick                    
|                   |  |  |  | Ryan F. McKendrick Chief
Executive Officer
|                   |  | 
|Date: May 06, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/ Donald W.
Pearson                     
|                   |  |  |  | Donald W. Pearson Chief
Financial Officer
Editorial Note on Part 14
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 14 appear at 88 FR 45065, July 14, 2023.

§ 14.7 Administrative remedies. A person who alleges noncompliance by the Commissioner or an advisory committee with any provision of this part or the Federal Advisory Committee Act may pursue the following administrative remedies: ( a ) If the person objects to any action, including a failure to act, other than denial of access to an advisory committee document, the person shall submit a petition in the form and in accordance with the requirements of § 10.30. The provisions of § 10.45 relating to exhaustion of administrative remedies are applicable. ( 1 ) If the person objects to past action, the person shall submit the petition within 30 days after the action objected to. If the Commissioner determines that there was noncompliance with any provision of this subpart or of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the Commissioner will grant any appropriate relief and take appropriate steps to prevent its future recurrence.
( 2 ) If the person objects to proposed future action, the Commissioner will expedite the review of the petition and make a reasonable effort to render a decision before the action concerned in the petition.
( 3 ) If the person objects to action that is imminent or occurring and which could not reasonably have been anticipated, e.g., the closing of a portion of a meeting which is made known for the first time on the day of the meeting, the matter may be handled by an oral petition in lieu of a written petition.
( b ) If the person objects to a denial of access to an advisory committee document, administrative review is in accordance with the procedures established by the Department of Health and Human Services under 45 CFR 5.61—and 45 CFR 5.64.
[44 FR 22351, Apr. 13, 1979, as amended at 55 FR 1404, Jan. 16, 1990; 85 FR 72906, Nov. 16, 2020]
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7111 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7111

 To establish the policy of the United States that the United Nations 
Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East should 
            be disbanded completely, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 29, 2024

   Mr. Mast introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To establish the policy of the United States that the United Nations 
Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East should 
            be disbanded completely, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``UNRWA Elimination Act''.

SEC. 2. STATEMENT OF POLICY.

    It is the policy of the United States that--
            (1) the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for 
        Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) should be disbanded 
        completely; and
            (2) all refugee services and responsibilities in the West 
        Bank and Gaza strip should be transferred to the United Nations 
        High Commissioner for Refugees.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATIONS TO ADVANCE POLICY TO DISBAND UNRWA.

    (a) In General.--The President shall take such steps as may be 
necessary to advocate for and advance the policy described in section 
2, including by--
            (1) coordinating international efforts to achieve the 
        outcomes described in such section; and
            (2) ensuring that any facility of the United Nations Relief 
        and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East in the 
        United States is removed.
    (b) Funding.--Any Federal funds made available to provide 
assistance to any foreign country shall include as a condition for 
receiving such funding that the country publicly supports the policy 
described in section 2.
    (c) Prohibition.--No Federal funds are authorized to be 
appropriated or otherwise made available to the United Nations Relief 
and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East, including for 
the salaries or expenses of any employee of such Agency, and no form of 
United States support is authorized to be made available for the 
programs, projects, or activities of such Agency.
                                 <all>
```
§ 1271.260 Storage. ( a ) *Control of storage areas.* You must control your storage areas and stock rooms to prevent: ( 1 ) Mix-ups, contamination, and cross-contamination of HCT/Ps, supplies, and reagents, and
( 2 ) An HCT/P from being improperly made available for distribution.
( b ) *Temperature.* You must store HCT/Ps at an appropriate temperature.
( c ) *Expiration date.* Where appropriate, you must assign an expiration date to each HCT/P based on the following factors: ( 1 ) HCT/P type;
( 2 ) Processing, including the method of preservation;
( 3 ) Storage conditions; and
( 4 ) Packaging.
( d ) *Corrective action.* You must take and document corrective action whenever proper storage conditions are not met.
( e ) *Acceptable temperature limits.* You must establish acceptable temperature limits for storage of HCT/Ps at each step of the manufacturing process to inhibit the growth of infectious agents. You must maintain and record storage temperatures for HCT/Ps. You must periodically review recorded temperatures to ensure that temperatures have been within acceptable limits.
exv10w5



 







Exhibit 10.5




CENTEX CORPORATION

AMENDED AND RESTATED

SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN




First Amendment




          Centex Corporation, a Nevada corporation, having established and maintaining the Centex
Corporation Amended and Restated Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”), and having
reserved the right to amend the SERP, does hereby amend the “Contributions” section of the SERP,
effective as of July 13, 2006, to read as follows:




“To be eligible for an annual SERP accrual a participant must be actively employed
by an Employer (as that term is defined in the Plan) on the date the SERP
contribution is to be credited to his or her account (and regardless of whether or
not he receives a contribution under the Plan for the same Plan year). The annual
SERP accrual for the account of each such eligible participant will be calculated
using the total compensation which, but for the Limitations or the participant not
being eligible to participate in the Plan, would be considered in determining the
appropriate profit sharing contribution for such participant under the Plan (“Total
Compensation”), less the amount, if any, which has been considered for the Plan
contribution. The difference between Total Compensation and the amount, if any,
considered in the Plan is herein called “Excess Salary.”




The accrual contribution to be allocated to the account of an eligible participant
will be the product of his or her Excess Salary times the percent of salary used by
his or her Employer in allocating the Plan contribution. Should the Plan formula be
changed in future years such that the contribution is not calculated exclusively as
a percentage of compensation, then the percentage to be used for the SERP shall
represent the percentage derived by dividing the total profit sharing contribution
for the applicable Employer by the sum of all Total Compensation for all of that
Employer’s Plan participants.”



          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Centex Corporation has caused these presents to be executed by its duly
authorized officer in a number of copies, all of which shall constitute one and the same
instrument, which may be sufficiently evidenced by any executed copy hereof, this 14th day of July,
2006, but effective as of July 13, 2006.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	CENTEX CORPORATION

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Michael S. Albright
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Michael S. Albright 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Senior Vice President - Administration
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 959 

To express support for recognition of June 2018 as National Orca Protection 

Month. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 22, 2018 

Mr. HECK (for himself, Mr. KILMER, Ms. DELBENE, Mr. SMITH of Washington, Mr. LARSEN of Washington, Ms. JAYAPAL, Mr. BLUMENAUER, 

and Ms. LEE) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

To express support for recognition of June 2018 as National 

Orca Protection Month. 

Whereas orcas are an icon of the Pacific Northwest; 

Whereas orcas are culturally and spiritually important to Indian tribes in the Pacific Northwest; 

Whereas the Puget Sound is home to three pods of Southern 

Resident orcas; 

Whereas the Southern Resident orca population has declined 

dramatically over the past 50 years; 

Whereas the Southern Resident orcas are among the most 

contaminated marine mammals in the world; 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 959 IH 

Whereas the Southern Resident orcas are threatened by declining chinook salmon populations; 

Whereas the Southern Resident orcas have been protected 

under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 

1531 et seq.) since 2005 and are one of the most endangered marine mammal populations in the world; 

Whereas the Southern Resident orca population reached its 

lowest level in 34 years in 2018, with 13 fewer whales 

than when the population was listed under the Endangered Species Act of 1973; 

Whereas June 2018 has been recognized by the States of 

Washington and Oregon as Orca Awareness Month; and 

Whereas the Federal Government has an obligation to protect 

and restore the Southern Resident orca population: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

2 recognition of National Orca Protection Month. 

Æ 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk April 29, 2009

p0422 

# Order

April 29, 2009

137888

ROBERT SAWYER WILLIAMS, TREVA WOMBLE and the ESTATE OF ROBERT SETON WILLIAMS, Robe rt Sawyer Williams, Personal Representative, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v SC: 137888 COA: 285920 Wayne CC: 05-529848-NO SHEEHAN’S ON THE GREEN, INC., and ESTATE OF ADAM GRADINSCAK, Walter Sakowski, Personal Representative, Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 3, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 2 (Tuesday, January 4, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 396]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-33162]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Express Mail Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service \TM\.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Postal Service notice of filing of a request with the Postal 
Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to 
the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification 
Schedule's Competitive Products List pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 
3632(b)(3).

DATES: January 4, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[reg] hereby 
gives notice that on December 17, 2010, it filed with the Postal 
Regulatory Commission a Request of the United States Postal Service to 
Add Express Mail Contract 11 to Competitive Product List. Documents are 
available at http://www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2011-14, CP2011-50.

Neva R. Watson,
Attorney, Legislative.
[FR Doc. 2010-33162 Filed 1-3-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
###### Editorial Note on Part 170

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 170 appear at 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001, and 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004.

#### § 170.103 Withdrawal without prejudice of a premarket notification for a food contact substance (FCN).

A manufacturer or supplier may withdraw an FCN without prejudice to a future submission to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) if FDA has not completed review of the FCN. For the purpose of this section, FDA's review is completed when FDA has allowed 120 days to pass without objecting to the FCN or FDA has issued an objection letter.
# PGI Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation

- PGI Part 205 - PUBLICIZING CONTRACT ACTIONS 
- PGI Part 206 - COMPETITION REQUIREMENTS 
- PGI Part 207 - ACQUISITION PLANNING 
- PGI Part 208 - REQUIRED SOURCES OF SUPPLIES AND SERVICES 
- PGI Part 209 - CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS 
- PGI Part 210 - MARKET RESEARCH 
- PGI Part 211 - DESCRIBING AGENCY NEEDS 
- PGI Part 212 - ACQUISITION OF COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES 

**Parent topic:**PGI Subchapter B - ACQUISITION PLANNING
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Iowa Women in Industry

              																	United States. Women's Bureau. 						*Iowa Women in Industry : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 19*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1922,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5343,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER