alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>				5
       
<S>					<C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>				9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>			DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>				SEP-30-1995
<CASH>					2,247,473
<SECURITIES>				000
<RECEIVABLES>				84,315
<ALLOWANCES>				000
<INVENTORY>				000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>			000
<PP&E>					000
<DEPRECIATION>                          000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          2,331,788
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   98,978
<BONDS>                                 000
<COMMON>				000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   000
<PREFERRED>				000
<OTHER-SE>				000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>		2,331,788
<SALES>                                 000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>			155,395
<CGS>					000
<TOTAL-COSTS>				000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>			148,346
<LOSS-PROVISION>			000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>			000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         6,749
<INCOME-TAX>				000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>			6,749
<DISCONTINUED>                          000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         000
<CHANGES>				000
<NET-INCOME>				6,749
<EPS-PRIMARY>				000
<EPS-DILUTED>				000
        

</TABLE>
§ 1271.155 Exemptions and alternatives. ( a ) *General.* You may request an exemption from or alternative to any requirement in subpart C or D of this part.
( b ) *Request for exemption or alternative.* Submit your request under this section to the Director of the appropriate Center (the Director), e.g., the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research or the Center for Devices and Radiological Health. The request must be accompanied by supporting documentation, including all relevant valid scientific data, and must contain either: ( 1 ) Information justifying the requested exemption from the requirement, or
( 2 ) A description of a proposed alternative method of meeting the requirement.
( c ) *Criteria for granting an exemption or alternative.* The Director may grant an exemption or alternative if he or she finds that such action is consistent with the goals of protecting the public health and/or preventing the introduction, transmission, or spread of communicable diseases and that: ( 1 ) The information submitted justifies an exemption; or
( 2 ) The proposed alternative satisfies the purpose of the requirement.
( d ) *Form of request.* You must ordinarily make your request for an exemption or alternative in writing (hard copy or electronically). However, if circumstances make it difficult (e.g., there is inadequate time) to submit your request in writing, you may make the request orally, and the Director may orally grant an exemption or alternative. You must follow your oral request with an immediate written request, to which the Director will respond in writing.
( e ) *Operation under exemption or alternative.* You must not begin operating under the terms of a requested exemption or alternative until the exemption or alternative has been granted. You may apply for an extension of an exemption or alternative beyond its expiration date, if any.
( f ) *Documentation.* If you operate under the terms of an exemption or alternative, you must maintain documentation of: ( 1 ) FDA's grant of the exemption or alternative, and
( 2 ) The date on which you began operating under the terms of the exemption or alternative.
( g ) *Issuance of an exemption or alternative by the Director.* In a public health emergency, the Director may issue an exemption from, or alternative to, any requirement in part 1271. The Director may issue an exemption or alternative under this section if the exemption or alternative is necessary to assure that certain HCT/Ps will be available in a specified location to respond to an unanticipated immediate need for those HCT/Ps.
# m8760.docx

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 9.2.2018 C(2018) 919 final To the Notifying Party Subject : Case M. 8760 – EPH / MATRAI EROMU Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 1 and Article 57 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area 2 Dear Sir or Madam, 1. On 18 January 2018 , the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which the undertaking Energetický a průmyslový holding, a.s . ("EPH", the Czech Republic) indirectly acquire s within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control over the whole of the undertaking Mátrai Erőmű Zártkörűen Működő Részvénytársaság (" Mátra ", Hungary) by way of a purchase of sha re s . 3 2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are: - for EPH: utility company engaged in lignite extraction, electricity and heat production, distribution and supply, as well as gas transmission, distribution and storage. In Hungary, it operates three gas-fired power plants, provides balancing services, as well as district heating in Budapest; - for Mátra : owns and operates a 966 MW, mainly lignite-fired power plant in Visonta . It also produces electricity from a biomass and solar plant. Furthermore, it owns and operates two open pit mines in Visonta and Bükkábrány . 3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5 ( c ) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 . 4 4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation and Article 57 of the EEA Agreement . For the Commission (Signed) Johannes LAITENBERGER Director - General
(1)
OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ( the ' Merger Regulation ' ). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( ' TFEU ' ) has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of ' Community ' by ' Union ' and ' common market ' by ' internal market ' . The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.
(2) OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3 ( the ' EEA Agreement ' ).
(3) Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 29 , 26 . 1 . 2 018 , p. 9 .
(4)
OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5 .
#### § 1400.1010 Suspending official (Department of the Interior supplement to the definition at 2 CFR 180.930).

The Suspending Official for the Department of the Interior is the Director, Office of Acquisition and Property Management.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1315

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part appear at 82 FR 97041, Dec. 30, 2016.

#### § 1315.54 Waiver or modification of rules.

The Administrator or the presiding officer (with respect to matters pending before him) may modify or waive any rule in this part by notice in advance of the hearing, if he determines that no party in the hearing will be unduly prejudiced and the ends of justice will thereby be served. Such notice of modification or waiver shall be made a part of the record of the hearing.
NUMBER 13-20-00480-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG 

JAVIER JASSO SALAZAR JR., Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 214th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

ORDER

Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Silva

Order Per Curiam

Before the Court is appellant's motion for pro se access to the appellate record.

On March 22, 2021, appellant's counsel filed an Anders brief, and appellant has been 

unable to examine the record in order to file a pro se brief. 

We GRANT appellant’s motion, and it is hereby ORDERED the trial court ensure 
2

that appellant has the opportunity to fully examine the appellate record on or before fifteen 

(15) days from the date this order issues, and it is FURTHER ORDERED that the trial 

court notify this Court as to the date upon which the appellate record was made available 

to appellant. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).

Furthermore, Appellant shall have thirty (30) days from the day the appellate

record is first made available to him to file his pro se brief with this Court. The State shall 

have twenty days thereafter to file its response, if any.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed on the

5th day of May, 2021.
Exhibit 99.2


               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


 In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Health Group Corp. (the
 "Company") on Form 10-Q, as amended by Form 10-Q/A, for the period ended
 June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
 date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph E. Whitters, Chief Financial Officer
 of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
 Company.



 /s/ Joseph E. Whitters
 -----------------------
 Joseph E. Whitters
 Chief Financial Officer
 August 15, 2002
[No. 21615-9-II.

Division Two.

January 9, 1998.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Paul Raymond Bitzer, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 96-1-02245-6, Mary wave Van Deren, J., entered February 3,1997. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Seinfeld, J., concurred in by Morgan and Armstrong, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Systemax Inc.,
hereby certifies that to the best of his knowledge, Systemax Inc.s annual
report for the year ended December 31, 2003 on Form 10-K as amended by Amendment
No. 1 on Form 10-K/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78
(o)(d)) and that the information contained in such Form 10-K/A fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Systemax Inc.

Dated:   April 15, 2005/s/ RICHARD LEEDS
Richard Leeds, Chief Executive Officer
2007-1551.

#### Klein v. Moutz.

Summit App. No. 23473, 2007-Ohio-3242. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Summit County. Upon consideration of the motion of Frank E. Steel and Michael A. Steel to withdraw as counsel for appellee,

It is ordered by the court that the motion is granted.
#### § 1301.45 Time and place of hearing.

The hearing will commence at the place and time designated in the order to show cause or notice of hearing published in the Federal Register (unless expedited pursuant to § 1301.36(h)) but thereafter it may be moved to a different place and may be continued from day to day or recessed to a later day without notice other than announcement thereof by the presiding officer at the hearing.

[62 FR 13956, Mar. 24, 1997]
§ 1.1154 What other records requirements must a LAAF-accredited laboratory meet? ( a ) In addition to the records requirements of § 1.1138(a), a LAAF-accredited laboratory must maintain, for 5 years after the date of creation, records created and received while it is LAAF-accredited that relate to compliance with this subpart, including: ( 1 ) Documents related to the LAAF-accredited laboratory's grant of LAAF-accreditation (and, if applicable, extensions and reductions of scope of LAAF-accreditation) from its recognized accreditation body, including all required proficiency test and comparison program records for each method within the scope of LAAF-accreditation under § 1.1138(a)(2);
( 2 ) Documentation of food testing the LAAF-accredited laboratory conducted under this subpart sufficient to account for all information required by § 1.1152(d), in accordance with § 1.1150(d);
( 3 ) All documents that the LAAF-accredited laboratory was required to submit to FDA under §§ 1.1152 and 1.1153, and associated correspondence between the LAAF-accredited laboratory (and its officers, employees, and other agents) and the owner or consignee (and its officers, employees, and other agents) regarding food testing under this subpart;
( 4 ) All requests for food testing from an owner or consignee that would be conducted under this subpart;
( 5 ) Documentation of any internal investigations, internal audits, and corrective action taken to address any problems or deficiencies related to activities under this subpart;
( 6 ) All documentation related to suspension, probation, reduction of scope, or withdrawal of LAAF-accreditation, or laboratory disqualification under this subpart; and
( 7 ) Documentation of changes to its management system or food testing activities that may affect its compliance with this subpart.
( b ) Make the records required by paragraph (a) of this section available for inspection and copying or for electronic submission upon written request of an authorized officer or employee of FDA. If FDA requests records for inspection and copying, the laboratory must make such records promptly available at the physical location of the laboratory or at another reasonably accessible location. If the authorized officer or employee of FDA requests electronic submission, the records must be submitted within 10 business days of the request.
( c ) Ensure that significant amendments to records described by this section can be tracked to previous and original versions. If such a significant amendment is made, both the original document and amended document must be maintained by the LAAF-accredited laboratory during the time period for which the amended document must be maintained under this subpart. The laboratory must also document the date of amendment, the personnel responsible for the amendment, and a conspicuous indication on the original document stating that the document has been altered and that a more recent version of the document exists.
Amendment to Employment Agreement for William G. Cornely



 Exhibit 10.6 
 AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment to Employment Agreement is entered into this
2nd day of August, 2006, by and between Dominion Homes, Inc. (hereinafter called the “Company”) and
William G. Cornely (hereinafter called the “Employee”). 
 WHEREAS, Employee has been employed by the Company since
January 17, 2006 as its Senior Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer. 
 WHEREAS, the Company and the Employee
previously entered into an employment agreement, effective January 17, 2006 (the “Agreement”). 
 WHEREAS, in light of
current business conditions affecting the Company, Employee has offered to forego a guaranteed minimum bonus of $100,000 for 2006 set forth in the Agreement, and the Company has accepted this offer. 
 WHEREAS, the Company and Employee desire to amend the Agreement to reflect this change, as set forth herein. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, and in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, the adequacy of which is agreed to by the parties, the Company and
the Employee hereby mutually agree as follows: 
 1. The following sentence shall be deleted from Paragraph 3, Compensation, of the Agreement:

 “For 2006, however, Employee shall be entitled to receive a guaranteed bonus of $100,000, subject to paragraphs 7 and 8 of this
Agreement.” 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed and delivered this Amendment to Employment Agreement as of the date
set forth above. 
  

					
	EMPLOYEE	 		 	DOMINION HOMES, INC.
			
	 /s/ William G. Cornely
	 		 	 /s/ Christine A. Murry

	William G. Cornely	 		 	Christine A. Murry,
		 		 	Vice President, Corporate Counsel and Secretary
EXHIBIT 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of BT
Office Products  International,  Inc. on Form S-8 (No.  333-07549) of our report
dated February 5, 1997, on our audit of the  consolidated  financial  statements
and financial statement schedule of BT Office Products International, Inc. as of
December 31, 1996, and for the year then ended, which report is included in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.




         Coopers & Lybrand, L.L.P.
         Chicago, Illinois
         March 26, 1997






<PAGE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-40643

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MARIO ARTURO LOPEZ-GONZALEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:16-CR-1195-1

Before DAVIS, HAYNES, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Mario Arturo LopezGonzalez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lopez-Gonzalez has not filed a response. We have 

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 17, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-40643 Document: 00514433992 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/17/2018
No. 17-40643

2

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 17-40643 Document: 00514433992 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/17/2018
# EUR-Lex - 31984D0376 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31984D0376

**84/376/EEC: Commission Decision of 6 July 1984 concerning the implementation by the Federal Republic of Germany of certain measures to adjust capacity in the fisheries sector (Only the German text is authentic) **

*
Official Journal L 196 , 26/07/1984 P. 0054 - 0054 *

*****

COMMISSION DECISION

of 6 July 1984

concerning the implementation by the Federal Republic of Germany of certain measures to adjust capacity in the fisheries sector

(Only the German text is authentic)

(84/376/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN

COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 83/515/EEC of 4 October 1983 concerning certain measures to adjust capacity in the fisheries sector (1), and in particular Article 7 (1) thereof,

Whereas the Government of the Federal Republic of Germany intends to introduce a system of financial aids for measures involving the temporary reduction of production capacity in the fisheries sector; whereas, on 7 February and 20 March 1984, it communicated the information and documents concerning this scheme required under Article 6 of Directive 83/515/EEC;

Whereas, in accordance with Article 7 of the said Directive, the Commission has considered whether, having regard to their compatibility with the Directive and in view of the other structural measures existing or planned in the fisheries sector, the measures contemplated fulfil the conditions for a financial contribution from the Community;

Whereas this Decision does not relate to national aid referred to in Article 12 of the said Directive;

Whereas this Decision is in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Fisheries Structures,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The measures which the Federal Republic of Germany intends to take to implement a financial aid scheme for measures involving the temporary reduction of production capacity in the fisheries sector fulfil the conditions for a financial contribution from the Community.

Article 2

This Decision shall not apply to national aid referred to in Article 12 of Directive 83/515/EEC.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Federal Republic of Germany.

Done at Brussels, 6 July 1984.

For the Commission

Giorgios CONTOGEORGIS

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 290, 22. 10. 1983, p. 15.
# EUR-Lex - 31993R1764 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31993R1764

**Council Regulation (EEC) No 1764/93 of 30 June 1993 amending Regulation (EEC) No 3906/89 on economic aid for certain countries of central and eastern Europe **

*
Official Journal L 162 , 03/07/1993 P. 0001 - 0001 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 50 P. 0212 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 50 P. 0212 *

COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) No 1764/93 of 30 June 1993 amending Regulation (EEC) No 3906/89 on economic aid for certain countries of central and eastern Europe

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, and in particular Article 235 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission (1),

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (2),

Whereas Regulation (EEC) No 3906/93 (3) provides for aid operations of an economic and humanitarian nature in support of the process of economic and social reform in certain countries of central and eastern Europe;

Whereas the Annex to that Regulation lists the countries which may receive such aid;

Whereas Czechoslovakia was dissolved on 1 January 1993 and at the same time two new sovereign Czech and Slovak republics were set up;

Whereas the Annex to Regulation (EEC) No 3906/89 should be amended to ensure the continuity of the arrangements provided for in that Regulation for successor republics,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The Annex to Regulation (EEC) No 3906/89 is hereby amended as follows:

1. the following countries shall be inserted: the Czech Republic and the Slovak Republic;

2. the reference to 'Czechoslovakia' shall be deleted.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

It shall apply from 1 January 1993.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Luxembourg, 30 June 1993.

For the Council

The President

S. BERGSTEIN

(1) OJ No C 110, 20. 4. 1993, p. 16.

(2) OJ No C 176, 28. 6. 1993.

(3) Oj No L 375, 23. 12. 1989, p. 11, as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 2334/92 (OJ No L 227, 11. 8. 1992, p. 1).