90 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 1 / Monday, January 3, 2011 / Notices 

1 In comments made on the interim final sunset 

regulations, a number of parties stated that the 

proposed five-day period for rebuttals to 

substantive responses to a notice of initiation was 

insufficient. This requirement was retained in the 

final sunset regulations at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(4). As 

provided in 19 CFR 351.302(b), however, the 

Department will consider individual requests to 

extend that five-day deadline based upon a showing 

of good cause. 

DOC Case no. ITC Case no. Country Product Department 

contact 

A–570–826 ...................... 731–TA–663 .......................... PRC ......... Paper Clips (3rd Review) ....................................... Jennifer Moats 

(202) 482– 

5047. 

A–403–801 ...................... 731–TA–454 .......................... Norway .... Fresh and Chilled Atlantic Salmon (3rd Review) ... David Goldberger 

(202) 482– 

4136. 

C–403–802 ...................... 701–TA–302 .......................... Norway .... Fresh and Chilled Atlantic Salmon (3rd Review) ... David Goldberger 

(202) 482– 

4136. 

Filing Information 

As a courtesy, we are making 

information related to Sunset 

proceedings, including copies of the 

pertinent statute and Department’s 

regulations, the Department schedule 

for Sunset Reviews, a listing of past 

revocations and continuations, and 

current service lists, available to the 

public on the Department’s Internet 

Web site at the following address: 

http://ia.ita.doc.gov/sunset/. All 

submissions in these Sunset Reviews 

must be filed in accordance with the 

Department’s regulations regarding 

format, translation, service, and 

certification of documents. These rules 

can be found at 19 CFR 351.303. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103 (d), the 

Department will maintain and make 

available a service list for these 

proceedings. To facilitate the timely 

preparation of the service list(s), it is 

requested that those seeking recognition 

as interested parties to a proceeding 

contact the Department in writing 

within 10 days of the publication of the 

Notice of Initiation. 

Because deadlines in Sunset Reviews 

can be very short, we urge interested 

parties to apply for access to proprietary 

information under administrative 

protective order (‘‘APO’’) immediately 

following publication in the Federal 

Register of this notice of initiation by 

filing a notice of intent to participate. 

The Department’s regulations on 

submission of proprietary information 

and eligibility to receive access to 

business proprietary information under 

APO can be found at 19 CFR 351.304– 

306. 

Information Required From Interested 

Parties 

Domestic interested parties defined in 

section 771(9)(C), (D), (E), (F), and (G) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.102(b)) wishing 

to participate in a Sunset Review must 

respond not later than 15 days after the 

date of publication in the Federal 

Register of this notice of initiation by 

filing a notice of intent to participate. 

See 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i). The 

required contents of the notice of intent 

to participate are set forth at 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(1)(ii). In accordance with the 

Department’s regulations, if we do not 

receive a notice of intent to participate 

from at least one domestic interested 

party by the 15-day deadline, the 

Department will automatically revoke 

the order without further review. See 19 

CFR 351.218(d)(1)(iii). 

If we receive an order-specific notice 

of intent to participate from a domestic 

interested party, the Department’s 

regulations provide that all parties 

wishing to participate in the Sunset 

Review must file complete substantive 

responses not later than 30 days after 

the date of publication in the Federal 

Register of this notice of initiation. The 

required contents of a substantive 

response, on an order-specific basis, are 

set forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3). Note 

that certain information requirements 

differ for respondent and domestic 

parties. Also, note that the Department’s 

information requirements are distinct 

from the Commission’s information 

requirements. Please consult the 

Department’s regulations for 

information regarding the Department’s 

conduct of Sunset Reviews.1 Please 

consult the Department’s regulations at 

19 CFR part 351 for definitions of terms 

and for other general information 

concerning antidumping and 

countervailing duty proceedings at the 

Department. 

This notice of initiation is being 

published in accordance with section 

751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218 

(c). 

Dated: December 20, 2010. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2010–33134 Filed 12–30–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Antidumping or Countervailing Duty 

Order, Finding, or Suspended 

Investigation; Opportunity To Request 

Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sheila E. Forbes, Office of AD/CVD 

Operations, Customs Unit, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230, 

telephone: (202) 482–4697. 

Background 

Each year during the anniversary 

month of the publication of an 

antidumping or countervailing duty 

order, finding, or suspension of 

investigation, an interested party, as 

defined in section 771(9) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), 

may request, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213, that the Department of 

Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) conduct 

an administrative review of that 

antidumping or countervailing duty 

order, finding, or suspended 

investigation. 

All deadlines for the submission of 

comments or actions by the Department 

discussed below refer to the number of 

calendar days from the applicable 

starting date. 

Respondent Selection 

In the event the Department limits the 

number of respondents for individual 

examination for administrative reviews 

initiated pursuant to requests made for 

the orders identified below, except for 

the review of the antidumping duty 

order on Wooden Bedroom Furniture 

from the People’s Republic of China 

(‘‘PRC’’) (A–570–890), the Department 

intends to select respondents based on 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(‘‘CBP’’) data for U.S. imports during the 

period of review (‘‘POR’’). We intend to 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 1 / Monday, January 3, 2011 / Notices 91 

1Or the next business day, if the deadline falls 

on a weekend, Federal holiday or any other day 

when the Department is closed. 

4 If the review request involves a non-market 

economy and the parties subject to the review 

request do not qualify for separate rates, all other 

exporters of subject merchandise from the nonmarket economy country who do not have a 

separate rate will be covered by the review as part 

of the single entity of which the named firms are 

a part. 

release the CBP data under 

Administrative Protective Order 

(‘‘APO’’) to all parties having an APO 

within seven days of publication of the 

initiation notice and to make our 

decision regarding respondent selection 

within 21 days of publication of the 

initiation Federal Register notice. 

Therefore, we encourage all parties 

interested in commenting on respondent 

selection to submit their APO 

applications on the date of publication 

of the initiation notice, or as soon 

thereafter as possible. The Department 

invites comments regarding the CBP 

data and respondent selection within 

five days of placement of the CBP data 

on the record of the review. 

If the Department limits the number 

of respondents selected for individual 

examination in the administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on wooden bedroom furniture from the 

PRC, it intends to select respondents 

based on volume data contained in 

responses to quantity and value 

questionnaires. Further, the Department 

intends to limit the number of quantity 

and value questionnaires issued in the 

wooden bedroom furniture from the 

PRC review based on CBP data for U.S. 

imports classified under the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) headings 

identified in the scope of the order. 

Since the units used to measure import 

quantities are not consistent for the 

HTSUS headings identified in the scope 

of the order on wooden bedroom 

furniture from the PRC, the Department 

will limit the number of quantity and 

value questionnaires issued based on 

the import values in CBP data as a proxy 

for import quantities. Parties subject to 

the review to which the Department 

does not send a quantity and value 

questionnaire may file a response to the 

quantity and value questionnaire by the 

applicable deadline if they desire to be 

included in the pool of companies from 

which the Department will select 

mandatory respondents. Additionally, 

exporters subject to the review to which 

the Department does not send a quantity 

and value questionnaire may file a 

separate rate application or separate rate 

certification, as appropriate, by the 

applicable deadline without filing a 

response to the quantity and value 

questionnaire. 

Opportunity to Request A Review: Not 

later than the last day of January 2011,1

interested parties may request 

administrative review of the following 

orders, findings, or suspended 

investigations, with anniversary dates in 

January for the following periods: 

Period to be reviewed 

Antidumping Duty Proceedings 

Brazil: Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand ................................................................... A–351–837 1/1/10—12/31/10 

India: Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand .................................................................... A–533–828 1/1/10—12/31/10 

Mexico: Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand ................................................................. A–201–831 1/1/10—12/31/10 

South Africa: Ferrovanadium ................................................................................................. A–791–815 1/1/10—12/31/10 

South Korea: 

Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand ....................................................................... A–580–852 1/1/10—12/31/10 

Top-of-the Stove Stainless Steel Cooking Ware2 .......................................................... A–580–601 1/1/10—11/16/10 

Thailand: Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand .............................................................. A–549–820 1/1/10—12/31/10 

The People’s Republic of China: 

Crepe Paper Products .................................................................................................... A–570–895 1/1/10—12/31/10 

Ferrovanadium ................................................................................................................ A–570–873 1/1/10—12/31/10 

Folding Gift Boxes .......................................................................................................... A–570–866 1/1/10—12/31/10 

Potassium Permanganate .............................................................................................. A–570–001 1/1/10—12/31/10 

Wooden Bedroom Furniture ........................................................................................... A–570–890 1/1/10—12/31/10 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings 

South Korea: Top-of-the-Stove Stainless Steel Cooking Ware 3 .......................................... C–580–602 1/1/10—11/21/10 

The People’s Republic of China: Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods ................................. C–570–944 1/20/10—12/31/10 

Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Line Pipe ........................................................... C–570–936 1/1/10—12/31/10 

Suspension Agreements 

Mexico: Fresh Tomatoes ....................................................................................................... A–201–820 1/1/10—12/31/10 

Russia: Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate ............................................................... A–821–808 1/1/10—12/31/10 

2The antidumping duty order on Top-of-the Stove Stainless Steel Cooking Ware was revoked due to sunset review effective November 17, 

2010. 3The countervailing duty order on Top-of-the Stove Stainless Steel Cooking Ware was revoked due to sunset review effective November 22, 

2010. 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(b), an interested party as 

defined by section 771(9) of the Act may 

request in writing that the Secretary 

conduct an administrative review. For 

both antidumping and countervailing 

duty reviews, the interested party must 

specify the individual producers or 

exporters covered by an antidumping 

finding or an antidumping or 

countervailing duty order or suspension 

agreement for which it is requesting a 

review. In addition, a domestic 

interested party or an interested party 

described in section 771(9)(B) of the Act 

must state why it desires the Secretary 

to review those particular producers or 

exporters.4 If the interested party 

intends for the Secretary to review sales 

of merchandise by an exporter (or a 

producer if that producer also exports 

merchandise from other suppliers) 

which were produced in more than one 

country of origin and each country of 

origin is subject to a separate order, then 

the interested party must state 

specifically, on an order-by-order basis, 

which exporter(s) the request is 

intended to cover. 

Please note that, for any party the 

Department was unable to locate in 

prior segments, the Department will not 

accept a request for an administrative 

review of that party absent new 

information as to the party’s location. 

Moreover, if the interested party who 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
92 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 1 / Monday, January 3, 2011 / Notices 

1See Petition for the Imposition of Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duties: Multilayered Wood 

Flooring from the People’s Republic of China, dated 

October 21, 2010 (‘‘Petition’’). 

files a request for review is unable to 

locate the producer or exporter for 

which it requested the review, the 

interested party must provide an 

explanation of the attempts it made to 

locate the producer or exporter at the 

same time it files its request for review, 

in order for the Secretary to determine 

if the interested party’s attempts were 

reasonable, pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.303(f)(3)(ii). 

As explained in Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003), the Department 

has clarified its practice with respect to 

the collection of final antidumping 

duties on imports of merchandise where 

intermediate firms are involved. The 

public should be aware of this 

clarification in determining whether to 

request an administrative review of 

merchandise subject to antidumping 

findings and orders. See also the Import 

Administration Web site at http:// 

ia.ita.doc.gov. 

Six copies of the request should be 

submitted to the Assistant Secretary for 

Import Administration, International 

Trade Administration, Room 1870, U.S. 

Department of Commerce, 14th Street 

and Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20230. The Department 

also asks parties to serve a copy of their 

requests to the Office of Antidumping/ 

Countervailing Operations, Attention: 

Sheila Forbes, in room 3508 of the main 

Commerce Building. Further, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 

351.303(f)(3)(ii), a copy of each request 

must be served on the petitioner and 

each exporter or producer specified in 

the request. 

The Department will publish in the 

Federal Register a notice of ‘‘Initiation 

of Administrative Review of 

Antidumping or Countervailing Duty 

Order, Finding, or Suspended 

Investigation’’ for requests received by 

the last day of January 2011. If the 

Department does not receive, by the last 

day of January 2011, a request for 

review of entries covered by an order, 

finding, or suspended investigation 

listed in this notice and for the period 

identified above, the Department will 

instruct the CBP to assess antidumping 

or countervailing duties on those entries 

at a rate equal to the cash deposit of (or 

bond for) estimated antidumping or 

countervailing duties required on those 

entries at the time of entry, or 

withdrawal from warehouse, for 

consumption and to continue to collect 

the cash deposit previously ordered. 

For the first administrative review of 

any order, there will be no assessment 

of antidumping or countervailing duties 

on entries of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption during the relevant 

provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period, of 

the order, if such a gap period is 

applicable to the POR. 

This notice is not required by statute 

but is published as a service to the 

international trading community. 

Dated: December 20, 2010. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2010–33123 Filed 12–30–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–570–971] 

Multilayered Wood Flooring From the 

People’s Republic of China: 

Postponement of Preliminary 

Determination in the Countervailing 

Duty Investigation 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: January 3, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Seth 

Isenberg and Joshua Morris, AD/CVD 

Operations, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–0588 and (202) 482–1779, 

respectively. 

Background 

On November 10, 2010, the 

Department of Commerce (‘‘the 

Department’’) initiated an investigation 

of multilayered wood flooring from the 

People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). See 

Multilayered Wood Flooring From the 

People’s Republic of China: Initiation of 

Countervailing Duty Investigation, 75 FR 

70719 (November 18, 2010) (‘‘Initiation 

Notice’’). Currently, the preliminary 

determination is due no later than 

January 14, 2011. 

Postponement of Due Date for 

Preliminary Determination 

Under section 703(c)(1)(B) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 

‘‘Act’’), the Department may extend the 

period for reaching a preliminary 

determination in a countervailing duty 

investigation until no later than the 

130th day after the date on which the 

administering authority initiates an 

investigation, if the Department 

determines that the parties are 

cooperating and additional time is 

necessary to make the preliminary 

determination because the case is 

extraordinarily complicated. The 

Department solicited and received 

comments from parties, and concludes 

that concerned parties are cooperating. 

The Department further finds that 

additional time is required because the 

number of alleged manufacturers, 

producers, and exporters listed in the 

Petition 1 has complicated the 

Department’s selection of the firms to 

individually investigate. See section 

703(c)(1)(B)(i)(IV) of the Act. 

Moreover, since the Initiation Notice, 

the Department has concluded it cannot 

use U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

data for respondent selection. Rather, it 

is appropriate to solicit information 

about the quantity and value of subject 

merchandise sales from the firms named 

in the Petition. Therefore, respondent 

selection is extraordinarily complicated 

due to the large number of companies 

from which the Department is gathering 

quantity and value information. Thus, 

the Department is extending the due 

date for the preliminary determination 

to no later than 130 days after the day 

on which the investigation was initiated 

(i.e., March 20, 2011). However, March 

20, 2011, falls on a Sunday, and it is the 

Department’s long-standing practice to 

issue a determination the next business 

day when the statutory deadline falls on 

a weekend, Federal holiday, or any 

other day when the Department is 

closed. See Notice of Clarification: 

Application of ‘‘Next Business Day’’ Rule 

for Administrative Determination 

Deadlines Pursuant to the Tariff Act of 

1930, As Amended, 70 FR 24533 (May 

10, 2005). Accordingly, the deadline for 

completion of the preliminary 

determination is now no later than 

Monday, March 21, 2011. 

This notice is issued and published 

pursuant to section 703(c)(2) of the Act 

and 19 CFR 351.205(f). 

Dated: December 27, 2010. 

Christian Marsh, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2010–33133 Filed 12–30–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES