alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 796 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

March 22, 2018. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to take from the Speaker’s table the bill (H.R. 

1625) to amend the State Department Basic Authorities Act 

of 1956 to include severe forms of trafficking in persons 

within the definition of transnational organized crime for purposes of the rewards program of the Department of State, 

and for other purposes, with the Senate amendment thereto, 

and to consider in the House, without intervention of any 

point of order, a motion offered by the chair of the Committee on Appropriations or his designee that the House concur in the Senate amendment with an amendment consisting 

of the text of Rules Committee Print 115–66. The Senate 

amendment and the motion shall be considered as read. The 

motion shall be debatable for one hour equally divided and 

controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the 

Committee on Appropriations. The previous question shall be 

considered as ordered on the motion to its adoption without 

intervening motion. 
2 

•HRES 796 EH 

SEC. 2. On any legislative day during the period from 

March 23, 2018, through April 9, 2018— 

(a) the Journal of the proceedings of the previous day 

shall be considered as approved; and 

(b) the Chair may at any time declare the House adjourned to meet at a date and time, within the limits of 

clause 4, section 5, article I of the Constitution, to be announced by the Chair in declaring the adjournment. 

SEC. 3. The Speaker may appoint Members to perform 

the duties of the Chair for the duration of the period addressed by section 2 of this resolution as though under clause 

8(a) of rule I. 

SEC. 4. Each day during the period addressed by section 

2 of this resolution shall not constitute a calendar day for 

purposes of section 7 of the War Powers Resolution (50 

U.S.C. 1546). 

SEC. 5. Each day during the period addressed by section 

2 of this resolution shall not constitute a legislative day for 

purposes of clause 7 of rule XIII. 

SEC. 6. The chair of the Committee on Appropriations 

may insert in the Congressional Record not later than March 

23, 2018, such material as he may deem explanatory of the 
3 

•HRES 796 EH 

Senate amendment and the motion specified in the first section of this resolution. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
##### U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 97-693

# Preliminary Geologic Map of the Little Piute Mountains, California; a Digital Database

### *By* Keith A. Howard, Michael L. Dennis, Karl Karlstrom, and  Geoffrey A. Phelps

### 1997

thumbnail view of map

This database, identified as "Preliminary Geologic map of the LittlePiute Mountains, California:  A digital database," is the databasefrom which the hard-copy map OF95-598, "Preliminary Geologic map of the Little Piute Mountains, California" was produced.

View the map as a ~36" x 32" PDF file: lpiute.pdf (1 MB)

View the cross sections as a ~15" x 26" PDF file: lp_xs.pdf (200 kB)

View the text of the open file report as a formatted html file: of97-693.html (40 kB)

View the database explanation pamphlet (readme) as an unformatted,text-only file: readme.txt (40 kB)

Download the figures from the text of the open file report as GIF images (clearer than in the html file):

figure 1figure1.gif (24 KB)

figure 2figure2.gif (8 KB)

figure 3figure3.gif (8 KB)

Download the database package in ARC/INFO 7.x uncompressed export formatalong with supporting materials in a compressed UNIX tar file(see the database explanation pamphlet for details): of97-693.tar.gz (2.9 MB compressed download file, 14 MB when uncompressed)

Download two Postscript plottable files, plates 1 and 2 of the open-file, at a scale of 1:10,000, in a compressed UNIX tar file (see the database explanation pamphlet for details): plots.tar.gz (1.3 MB compressed download file, 12 MB when uncompressed)

Please send questions about this report toKeith Howard

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          16,499
<SECURITIES>                                    89,524
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,368
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,161)
<INVENTORY>                                      4,518
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               132,672
<PP&E>                                          18,567
<DEPRECIATION>                                (10,369)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 141,166
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         (20,439)
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          (22)
<OTHER-SE>                                   (120,056)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 (141,166)
<SALES>                                         29,718
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,718
<CGS>                                           20,741
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,741
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,359
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (5,382)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,380
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,002)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,002)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,002)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.19)


</TABLE>
223 So.2d 410

#### Robert OUSLEY v. AMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 49858.

June 13, 1969.

In re: Robert Ousley applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Allen. 220 So.2d 486.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in its judgment.
§ 111.80 What representative samples must you collect? The representative samples that you must collect include: ( a ) Representative samples of each unique lot of components, packaging, and labels that you use to determine whether the components, packaging, and labels meet specifications established in accordance with § 111.70(b) and (d), and as applicable, § 111.70(a) (and, when you receive components, packaging, or labels from a supplier, representative samples of each unique shipment, and of each unique lot within each unique shipment);
( b ) Representative samples of in-process materials for each manufactured batch at points, steps, or stages, in the manufacturing process as specified in the master manufacturing record where control is necessary to ensure the identity, purity, strength, and composition of dietary supplements to determine whether the in-process materials meet specifications established in accordance with § 111.70(c), and as applicable, § 111.70(a);
( c ) Representative samples of a subset of finished batches of each dietary supplement that you manufacture, which you identify through a sound statistical sampling plan (or otherwise every finished batch), before releasing for distribution to verify that the finished batch of dietary supplement meets product specifications established in accordance with § 111.70(e), and as applicable, § 111.70(a);
( d ) Representative samples of each unique shipment, and of each unique lot within each unique shipment, of product that you receive for packaging or labeling as a dietary supplement (and for distribution rather than for return to the supplier) to determine whether the received product meets specifications established in accordance with § 111.70(f), and as applicable, § 111.70(a); and
( e ) Representative samples of each lot of packaged and labeled dietary supplements to determine whether the packaging and labeling of the finished packaged and labeled dietary supplements meet specifications established in accordance with § 111.70(g), and as applicable, § 111.70(a).
#### § 76.23 Specific exemptions.

The Commission may, upon its own initiative or upon application of the Corporation, grant such exemptions from the requirements of the certification regulations as it determines are authorized by law and will not endanger life, or property, or the common defense and security, and are otherwise in the public interest.
EX-31 Rule13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Anthony Sfarra,certify that:

 

1. I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed inrespect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the WFRBSCommercial Mortgage Trust 2013-C12 (the "Exchange Act periodicreports");

 

2. Based on myknowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of  the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;

 

3. Based on myknowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required tobe provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is includedin the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on myknowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report underItem 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under theservicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reportson assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesand their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance withservicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in thisreport in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except asotherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliancedescribed in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me bythe following unaffiliated parties:

 

National CooperativeBank, N.A. (as successor to NCB, FSB), as NCB Master Servicer, Rialto CapitalAdvisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, National Cooperative Bank, N.A., as Co-opSpecial Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, PentalphaSurveillance LLC, as Trust Advisor, CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services,Inc., as Servicing Function Participant, National Tax Search, LLC, as ServicingFunction Participant, and Prudential Asset Resources, Inc., as PrimaryServicer.

 

 

 

Dated: March 21, 2019

 

 

/s/ Anthony Sfarra

 

 

President

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
§ 111.430 Under this subpart L, what records must you make and keep? ( a ) You must make and keep records required under this subpart L in accordance with subpart P of this part.
( b ) You must make and keep records of the written procedures for packaging and labeling operations.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 899 

To terminate the Department of Education. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2017 

Mr. MASSIE (for himself, Mr. AMASH, Mr. BIGGS, Mr. CHAFFETZ, Mr. GAETZ, 

Mr. JODY B. HICE of Georgia, Mr. JONES, and Mr. LABRADOR) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To terminate the Department of Education. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF EDU4 CATION. 

5 The Department of Education shall terminate on De6 cember 31, 2018. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
#### People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lindberg P. Evans (Impleaded), Defendant-Appellant.

Gen. No. 52,209. (Abstract of Decision.)

First District, Third Division.

June 19, 1969.

Gerald W. Getty, Public Defender of Cook County, of Chicago (Saul H. Brauner, Norman W. Fishman, and James J. Doherty, Assistant Public Defenders, of counsel), for appellant;

John J. Stamos, *147State’s Attorney of Cook County, of Chicago (Elmer C. Kissane and Gerald T. Rohrer, Assistant State’s Attorneys, of counsel), for appellee.

Opinion by JUSTICE SCHWARTZ. Not to be published in full.
#### § 1316.33 Conduct of proceeding.

Presentation of views at a hearing under this subpart shall be private and informal. The views presented shall be confined to matters relevant to bringing violations into compliance with the Act or to other contemplated proceedings under the Act. These views may be presented orally or in writing by the person to whom the notice was given, or by his authorized representative.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1996
<CASH>                                      22,091,000
<SECURITIES>                                 3,758,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,924,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            37,269,000
<PP&E>                                       3,168,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,325,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              39,303,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,061,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        81,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  31,161,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                39,303,000
<SALES>                                     18,500,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,500,000
<CGS>                                        5,571,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,430,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               530,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,642,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    25,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,617,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,617,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19
        

</TABLE>
H. Res. 959

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 19, 2006.

Whereas since the passage of the Adoption and Safe Families 

Act of 1997, the number of children adopted from foster 

care has increased significantly, with approximately 

51,000 children adopted from foster care in fiscal year 

2004 alone; 

Whereas despite this remarkable progress, approximately 

118,000 children in the United States foster care system 

are waiting to be adopted, and 49 percent of these children are at least nine years old; 

Whereas adoptive families make an important difference in 

the lives of the children they adopt by providing a stable, 

nurturing environment for those children; 

Whereas National Adoption Day is a collective national effort 

to find permanent, loving families for children in foster 

care; 

Whereas both National Adoption Day and National Adoption 

Month are in November; 

Whereas the Department of Health and Human Services 

launched a series of public service announcements promoting the adoption of children eight and older in 2002; 

Whereas more than 6,000 children have been placed into 

adoptive homes since the Department of Health and 
2

•HRES 959 EH 

Human Services launched www.adoptuskids.org, a national photo listing service for children awaiting adoption 

across the United States; 

Whereas judges, attorneys, adoption professionals, child welfare agencies, and child advocates in 45 States and the 

District of Columbia participated in 227 events in conjunction with National Adoption Day in 2005; and 

Whereas these events finalized the adoptions of more than 

3,300 children from foster care: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) recognizes and supports the success of the 

Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997 and of the efforts it has spurred; 

(2) recognizes and supports the goals and ideals of 

National Adoption Day and National Adoption Month; 

and 

(3) encourages adoption throughout the year. 

Attest:

Clerk.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 2 (Tuesday, January 4, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 375]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-33204]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-5472-N-01]


Notice of Availability: Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) for 
Fiscal Year 2010; Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCU) 
Program

AGENCY: Office of the Chief of the Human Capital Officer, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: HUD announces the availability on its Web site of the 
applicant information, submission deadlines, funding criteria, and 
other requirements for HUD's FY 2010 Historically Black Colleges and 
Universities (HBCU) program. The Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) 
announces a second round of funding this Fiscal Year 2010. This NOFA is 
governed by the information and instructions found in HUD's Fiscal Year 
2010 Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) Policy Requirements and 
General Section that HUD issued on June 7, 2010. The purpose of the 
HBCU program is to assist historically black colleges and universities 
to expand their role and effectiveness in addressing community 
development needs in their localities, including neighborhood 
revitalization, housing, and economic development, principally for 
persons of low- and moderate-income.
    The notice providing information regarding the application process, 
funding criteria and eligibility requirements can be found using the 
Department of Housing and Urban Development agency link on the 
Grants.gov/Find Web site at http://www.grants.gov/search/agency.do. A 
link to Grants.gov is also available on the HUD Web site at http://www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/fundsavail.cfm. The Catalogue of Federal 
Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number for this program is 14.520. 
Applications must be submitted electronically through Grants.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions regarding specific program 
requirements should be directed to the agency contact identified in the 
program NOFA. Program staff will not be available to provide guidance 
on how to prepare the application. Questions regarding the 2010 General 
Section should be directed to the Office of Grants Management and 
Oversight at (202) 708-0667 or the NOFA Information Center at 800-HUD-
8929 (toll free). Persons with hearing or speech impairments may access 
these numbers via TTY by calling the Federal Information Relay Service 
at 800-877-8339.

    Dated: December 29, 2010.
Barbara S. Dorf,
Director, Office of Departmental Grants Management and Oversight, 
Office of the Chief Human Capital Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-33204 Filed 1-3-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
#### § 1313.02 Definitions.

Any term used in this part shall have the definition set forth in section 102 of the Act (21 U.S.C. 802) or part 1300 of this chapter.

[62 FR 13969, Mar. 24, 1997]
#### § 3254.437 What method do I use to communicate to a participant the requirements described in the OMB guidance at 2 CFR 180.435?

To communicate to a participant the requirements described in 2 CFR 180.435 of the OMB guidance, you must include a term or condition in the transaction that requires the participant's compliance with subpart C of 2 CFR part 180, as supplemented by subpart C of this part, and requires the participant to include a similar term or condition in lower-tier covered transactions.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1436

AZEB YIGALEM,

Petitioner,

versus

JOHN ASHCROFT, 

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A75-795-046)

Submitted: July 28, 2004 Decided: August 18, 2004

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rev. Uduak J. Ubom, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Peter D.

Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright,

Assistant Director, Daniel E. Goldman, Office of Immigration

Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.,

for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Azeb Yigalem, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions

for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

(“Board”) dismissing her appeal of the immigration judge’s denial

of her applications for asylum and withholding of removal.

On appeal, Yigalem raises challenges to the immigration

judge’s determination that she failed to establish her eligibility

for asylum. To obtain reversal of a determination denying

eligibility for relief, an alien “must show that the evidence [s]he

presented was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could

fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.” INS v. EliasZacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 483-84 (1992). We have reviewed the

evidence of record and conclude that Yigalem fails to show that the

evidence compels a contrary result. Accordingly, we cannot grant

the relief Yigalem seeks.

Additionally, we uphold the immigration judge’s denial of

Yigalem’s request for withholding of removal. To qualify for

withholding of removal, an applicant must demonstrate “a clear

probability of persecution.” INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca, 480 U.S. 421,

430-31 (1987). The standard for withholding of removal is more

stringent than that for granting asylum. Chen v. INS, 195 F.3d

198, 205 (4th Cir. 1999). Because Yigalem fails to show that she

is eligible for asylum, she cannot meet the higher standard for

withholding of removal.
- 3 -

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED