alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2015-2568 ☐ These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2014-SW-026-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: ☒ FRAN ☐ SNPRM

☒ No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? 

If yes, list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the

previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point 

for guidance. Latest Revision.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: Choose one.

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): Click here to enter text.

What change to the AD action is requested? Click here to enter text.

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Click here to enter text.

Do we agree? Yes/No

If YES, we agree because Insert justification Make the following changes to the AD: List any 

changes to the AD

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with Insert text because Insert justification We disagree with

Insert text because Insert justification Make the following changes to the AD: List any 

changes to the AD

If NO, we don’t agree because Insert our rationale

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: Choose one.

If other, explain: Click here to enter text.

Commenter(s): Click here to enter text.

What change to the AD action is requested? Click here to enter text.

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Click here to enter text.

Do we agree? Yes/No 
Page 2 of 3

If YES, we agree because Insert justification Make the following changes to the AD: List any 

changes to the AD

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with Insert text because Insert justification We disagree with

Insert text because Insert justification Make the following changes to the AD: List any 

changes to the AD

If NO, we don’t agree because Insert our rationale

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DONTE CHRISTIAN JACKSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-2036

[February 13, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. 

Lucie County; Dan. L. Vaughn, Judge; L.T. Case No. 562011CF003475A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Benjamin Eisenberg, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Heidi L. Bettendorf, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, FORST and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# EUR-Lex - 31993D0346 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31993D0346

**93/346/EEC: Commission Decision of 27 May 1993 amending Decision 86/473/EEC as regards the list of establishments in Uruguay approved for the purpose of importing meat products into the Community **

*
Official Journal L 139 , 10/06/1993 P. 0023 - 0024 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 49 P. 0260 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 49 P. 0260 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 27 May 1993 amending Decision 86/473/EEC as regards the list of establishments in Uruguay approved for the purpose of importing meat products into the Community

(93/346/EEC)THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 72/462/EEC of 12 December 1972 on health and veterinary inspection problems upon importation of bovine, ovine and caprine animals and swine, fresh meat or meat products from third countries (1), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1601/92 (2), and in particular Article 4 (1) thereof,

Whereas a list of establishments in Uruguay, approved for the purpose of importing meat products into the Community, was drawn up initially by Commission Decision 86/473/EEC (3), as last amended by Decision 92/99/EEC (4);

Whereas a Community on-the-spot visit to meat product establishments in Uruguay has revealed that the level of hygiene in one establishment since the last inspection; whereas the list of establishments should be amended accordingly;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Annex to Decision 86/473/EEC is hereby replaced by the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 May 1993.

For the Commission

René STEICHEN

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 302, 31. 12. 1972, p. 28.

(2) OJ No L 173, 27. 6. 1992, p. 13.

(3) OJ No L 279, 30. 9. 1986, p. 53.

(4) OJ No L 39, 15. 2. 1992, p. 42.

ANNEX

LIST OF ESTABLISHMENTS

/* Tables: see OJ */
§ 123.28 Source controls. ( a ) In order to meet the requirements of subpart A of this part as they apply to microbiological contamination, chemical contamination, natural toxins, and related food safety hazards, processors shall include in their HACCP plans how they are controlling the origin of the molluscan shellfish they process to ensure that the conditions of paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) of this section are met.
( b ) Processors shall only process molluscan shellfish harvested from growing waters approved for harvesting by a shellfish control authority. In the case of molluscan shellfish harvested from U.S. Federal waters, the requirements of this paragraph will be met so long as the shellfish have not been harvested from waters that have been closed to harvesting by an agency of the Federal government.
( c ) To meet the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section, processors who receive shellstock shall accept only shellstock from a harvester that is in compliance with such licensure requirements as may apply to the harvesting of molluscan shellfish or from a processor that is certified by a shellfish control authority, and that has a tag affixed to each container of shellstock. The tag shall bear, at a minimum, the information required in § 1240.60(b) of this chapter. In place of the tag, bulk shellstock shipments may be accompanied by a bill of lading or similar shipping document that contains the information required in § 1240.60(b) of this chapter. Processors shall maintain records that document that all shellstock have met the requirements of this section. These records shall document: ( 1 ) The date of harvest;
( 2 ) The location of harvest by State and site;
( 3 ) The quantity and type of shellfish;
( 4 ) The date of receipt by the processor; and
( 5 ) The name of the harvester, the name or registration number of the harvester's vessel, or an identification number issued to the harvester by the shellfish control authority.
( d ) To meet the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section, processors who receive shucked molluscan shellfish shall accept only containers of shucked molluscan shellfish that bear a label that complies with § 1240.60(c) of this chapter. Processors shall maintain records that document that all shucked molluscan shellfish have met the requirements of this section. These records shall document: ( 1 ) The date of receipt;
( 2 ) The quantity and type of shellfish; and
( 3 ) The name and certification number of the packer or repacker of the product.
§ 1004.3 Plans for the replacement of electronic products. Every plan for replacing an electronic product with a like or equivalent product shall be submitted to the Secretary in writing, and in addition to other relevant information which the Secretary may require, shall include: ( a ) Identification of the product to be replaced.
( b ) A description of the replacement product in sufficient detail to support the manufacturer's contention that the replacement product is like or equivalent to the product being replaced.
( c ) The approximate number of defective product units which have left the place of manufacture.
( d ) The manner in which the replacement operation will be effected including the procedure for obtaining possession of the product to be replaced.
( e ) A time limit, reasonable, in light of the circumstances for completion of the replacement.
( f ) The steps which the manufacturer will take to insure that the defective product will not be reintroduced into commerce, until it complies with each applicable Federal standard and has no defect relating to the safety of its use.
( g ) The system by which the manufacturer will provide reimbursement for any expenses for transportation of such product incurred in connection with effecting the replacement.
( h ) The text of the statement which the manufacturer will send to the persons specified in § 1003.10(b) of this chapter informing such persons; ( 1 ) That the manufacturer, at its expense, will replace the electronic product involved,
( 2 ) Of the method by which the manufacturer will obtain possession of the product and effect the replacement,
( 3 ) That the manufacturer will reimburse such persons for any transportation expenses incurred in connection with effecting such replacement, and
( 4 ) Of the manner in which such reimbursement will be made.
( i ) An assurance that the manufacturer will provide the Secretary with progress reports on the effectiveness of the plan, including the number of electronic products replaced.
2007-2412.

#### State v. Monroe.

Franklin App. No. 06AP-554. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
§ 146.151 Orange juice for manufacturing. ( a ) Orange juice for manufacturing is the food prepared for further manufacturing use. It is prepared from unfermented juice obtained from oranges as provided in § 146.135, except that the oranges may deviate from the standards for maturity in that they are below the minimum for Brix and Brix-acid ratio for such oranges, and to which juice may be added not more than 10 percent by volume of the unfermented juice obtained from oranges of the species *Citrus reticulata* or *Citrus reticulata* hybrids (except that this limitation shall not apply to the hybrid species described in § 146.135). Seeds (except embryonic seeds and small fragments of seeds that cannot be separated by good manufacturing practice) are removed, and pulp and orange oil may be adjusted in accordance with good manufacturing practice. If pulp is added it shall be other than washed or spent pulp. The juice or portions thereof may be so treated by heat as to reduce substantially the enzymatic activity and number of viable microorganisms, and it may be chilled or frozen, or it may be so treated by heat, either before or after sealing in containers, as to prevent spoilage.
( b ) The name of the food is “Orange juice for manufacturing”.
[42 FR 14433, Mar. 15, 1977, as amended at 57 FR 57667, Dec. 7, 1992]
H. Res. 4 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 3, 2017. 

Resolved, That the Clerk be instructed to inform the 

President of the United States that the House of Representatives has elected Paul D. Ryan, a Representative from the 

State of Wisconsin as Speaker, and Karen L. Haas, a citizen 

of the State of Maryland as Clerk, of the House of Representatives of the One Hundred Fifteenth Congress. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
#### Robert Chester Weathers, *Appellant,*v. State of Kansas, *Appellee.*

No. 47,816

Opinion filed December 13, 1975.

T. L. *O’Hara,*of Warner, Bailey, O’Hara & Fitts, of Wichita, argued the cause, and was on the brief for the appellant.

*Robert L. Kennedy, Jr.,*assistant district attorney, argued the cause, and *Curt T. Schneider,*attorney general, *Keith Sanborn,*district attorney, and *Stephen M. Joseph,*assistant district attorney, were on the brief for the appellee.

*Per Curiam:*

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 796 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 796

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        March 22, 2018.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to take 
from the Speaker's table the bill (H.R. 1625) to amend the State Department 
Basic Authorities Act of 1956 to include severe forms of trafficking in persons 
within the definition of transnational organized crime for purposes of the 
rewards program of the Department of State, and for other purposes, with the 
Senate amendment thereto, and to consider in the House, without intervention of 
any point of order, a motion offered by the chair of the Committee on 
Appropriations or his designee that the House concur in the Senate amendment 
with an amendment consisting of the text of Rules Committee Print 115-66. The 
Senate amendment and the motion shall be considered as read. The motion shall be 
debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. The previous question shall 
be considered as ordered on the motion to its adoption without intervening 
motion.
    Sec. 2.  On any legislative day during the period from March 23, 2018, 
through April 9, 2018--
     (a) the Journal of the proceedings of the previous day shall be considered 
as approved; and
    (b) the Chair may at any time declare the House adjourned to meet at a date 
and time, within the limits of clause 4, section 5, article I of the 
Constitution, to be announced by the Chair in declaring the adjournment.
    Sec. 3.  The Speaker may appoint Members to perform the duties of the Chair 
for the duration of the period addressed by section 2 of this resolution as 
though under clause 8(a) of rule I.
    Sec. 4.  Each day during the period addressed by section 2 of this 
resolution shall not constitute a calendar day for purposes of section 7 of the 
War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1546).
    Sec. 5.  Each day during the period addressed by section 2 of this 
resolution shall not constitute a legislative day for purposes of clause 7 of 
rule XIII.
    Sec. 6.  The chair of the Committee on Appropriations may insert in the 
Congressional Record not later than March 23, 2018, such material as he may deem 
explanatory of the Senate amendment and the motion specified in the first 
section of this resolution.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### STEELMAN *against*BOLTON.

0» CERTIORARI.

This was a proceeding by the plaintiff below, who is the defendant in this court, for two penalties under the act concerning inns and taverns, for selling liquor by small measure. The justices issued two summonses, in trespass on the case, for ten dollars each, returnable at the same time, and tried both causes together ; and the jury found a general verdict of sixteen dollars. The jurors’ names were not entered on the docket. It did not appear by the transcript, that any witnesses were sworn. It was alleged, on the part of the plaintiff in *certiorari,*who was the defendant below, that the whole proceeding was erroneous. That there ought to have been but one action commenced; that that action should have been an action of debt, and not case; that the plaintiff could [*] not consolidate her own actions but must pursue them separately; that a jury cannot render a verdict for a part of a penalty, but must find the whole or nothing; that the jurors’ names should have been entered on the justice’s docket; that it did not appear that any witnesses were examined, and of course there was a trial and verdict against the defendant below, without evidence; and lastly, that no judgment was entered.

*304
      *Pearson,*for plaintiff.

By the Court.

— The whole proceeding is replete with, error. Let it be set aside.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Richard Leeds, Chief Executive Officer of Systemax Inc.,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Systemax
Inc. (the registrant);

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and (except as disclosed in Item 9A of this annual report on Form 10-K) we
have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
reasonably ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
these entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants control over
financial reporting.

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee
of the registrants board of directors:

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting known to me
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
controls over financial reporting.

Date: April 15, 2005

/s/ RICHARD LEEDS
Richard Leeds, Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Consumer Product Safety Commission

# Time and Date:

Tuesday, February 16, 2010, 2 p.m.-4 p.m.

# Place:

Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland.

# Status:

Commission Meeting—Open to the Public.

# Matters to be Considered:

1. Unblockable Drains/Public Accommodations—Virginia Graeme Baker Pool and Spa Safety Act/Minimum State Requirements for Grants.

                        A live webcast of the Meeting can be viewed at                         *http://www.cpsc.gov/​webcast/​index.html.*

For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, call (301) 504-7948.

# Contact Person for More Information:

Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814 (301) 504-7923.

Dated: February 12, 2010.

Todd A. Stevenson,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-3323 Filed 2-22-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6355-01-M
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Brian Harrison Sims, * From the 35th District Court

of Brown County,

Trial Court No. CR25839.

Vs. No. 11-18-00223-CR * September 27, 2018

The State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consist Bailey, C.J., 

Willson, J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

sitting by assignment)

(Willson, J., not participating)

 This court has considered Brian Harrison Sims’s motion to dismiss his

appeal and concludes that the motion should be granted. Therefore, in 

accordance with this court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Nabeel Gareeb, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Kenneth H. Hannah,
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: February 28, 2008



By:

/s/ Nabeel GareebName:

Nabeel GareebTitle:

President and Chief Executive Officer MEMC
Electronic Materials, Inc.


Date: February 28, 2008



By:

/s/ Kenneth H. HannahName:

Kenneth H. HannahTitle:

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc.