alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32
                   Certification of Periodic Financial Report
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of AMCOL
International Corporation (the "Company") certifies that the quarterly report on
Form 10-Q of the Company for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Date:  November 9, 2004                      /s/ Lawrence E. Washow
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Lawrence E. Washow
                                             Chief Executive Officer

Date:  November 9, 2004                      /s/ Gary L. Castagna
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Gary L. Castagna
                                             Chief Financial Officer


                                       26
EXHIBIT 32.02 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of Amerityre Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anders A. Suarez, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   /S/ Anders A. Suarez Anders A. Suarez Chief Financial Officer  September 28, 2009
#### § 16.40 Commissioner.

Whenever the Commissioner has delegated authority on a matter for which a regulatory hearing is available under this part, the functions of the Commissioner under this part may be performed by any of the officials to whom the authority has been delegated, e.g., a center director.

[69 FR 17290, Apr. 2, 2004]
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 5.1





                                January 14, 1998


Board of Directors
Cowlitz Bancorporation
927 Commerce Avenue
Longview, Washington  98632

Gentlemen:

        We have acted as counsel for Cowlitz Bancorporation (the "Company"), a
Washington corporation, in connection with the (i) authorization and issuance of
1,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company, no par value per share (the
"Issuer Shares"), (ii) the possible sale of an additional 133,000 shares of
common stock of the Company pursuant to an over-allotment option granted to the
underwriters (the "Option Shares"), (iii) the possible sale of 17,000 shares of
common stock of the Company by existing shareholders pursuant to an
over-allotment option granted to the underwriters ("the Selling Shareholder
Shares") and (iv) the preparation of a Registration Statement on Form S-1 (the
"Registration Statement") under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. We have
examined the Registration Statement, the records of the Company and such other
documents as we deem necessary for the purpose of this opinion.

        Based on the foregoing, we are of the opinion that:

        1. Upon effectiveness of the Registration Statement, due execution by
the Company and the registration by the Company's registrar of the Issuer Shares
and the Option Shares and the receipt by the Company of the consideration from
the sale of the Issuer Shares and the Option Shares as contemplated by the
Registration Statement, each of the Issuer Shares and the Option Shares will be
duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable.

        2. The Selling Stockholder Shares are validly issued, fully paid and
non-assessable.

        We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement and to the reference to our firm in the Prospectus
included in the Registration Statement under the caption "Legal Matters."




                                       Very truly yours,

                                       FOSTER PEPPER & SHEFELMAN PLLC
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Bell Industries, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Tracy
A. Edwards, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ Tracy A. Edwards



Tracy A. Edwards
President and Chief Executive Officer
March 28, 2003


                                       39
# LI2018178EN.01000101.xml

| 16.7.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | LI 178/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

LI 178/1

---

COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2018/999

of 16 July 2018

implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1686 imposing additional restrictive measures directed against ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaeda and natural and legal persons, entities or bodies associated with them

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) 2016/1686 of 20 September 2016 imposing additional restrictive measures directed against ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaeda and natural and legal persons, entities or bodies associated with them (1), and in particular Article 4(1) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 20 September 2016, the Council adopted Regulation (EU) 2016/1686. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 20 September 2016, the Council adopted Regulation (EU) 2016/1686.

| (2) | In view of the continued threat posed by ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaeda and natural and legal persons, entities or bodies associated with them, one person should be added to the list of natural and legal persons, entities and bodies in Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2016/1686. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

In view of the continued threat posed by ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaeda and natural and legal persons, entities or bodies associated with them, one person should be added to the list of natural and legal persons, entities and bodies in Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2016/1686.

| (3) | Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2016/1686 should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2016/1686 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2016/1686 is amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 July 2018.

For the Council

The President

F. MOGHERINI

---

(1)  
  OJ L 255, 21.9.2016, p. 1.

1

---

ANNEX

The following person is added to the list set out in Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2016/1686:

| ‘2. | Rabah TAHARI (a.k.a. Abu Musab); date of birth: 28 August 1971; place of birth: Oran (Algeria); Nationality: Algerian.’. |
| --- | --- |

‘2.

---
§ 1271.220 Processing and process controls. ( a ) *General.* If you are an establishment that processes HCT/Ps, you must process each HCT/P in a way that does not cause contamination or cross-contamination during processing, and that prevents the introduction, transmission, or spread of communicable disease through the use of the HCT/P.
( b ) *Pooling.* Human cells or tissue from two or more donors must not be pooled (placed in physical contact or mixed in a single receptacle) during manufacturing.
( c ) *In-process control and testing.* You must ensure that specified requirements, consistent with paragraph (a) of this section, for in-process controls are met, and that each in-process HCT/P is controlled until the required inspection and tests or other verification activities have been completed, or necessary approvals are received and documented. Sampling of in-process HCT/Ps must be representative of the material to be evaluated.
( d ) *Dura mater.* ( 1 ) When there is a published validated process that reduces the risk of transmissible spongiform encephalopathy, you must use this process for dura mater (or an equivalent process that you have validated), unless following this process adversely affects the clinical utility of the dura mater.
( 2 ) When you use a published validated process, you must verify such a process in your establishment.
Exhibit
32





Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant To


Section
906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002







In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Hancock Fabrics, Inc. (the “Hancock”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended May 3, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), both, Jane F. Aggers,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Hancock and Robert W. Driskell, Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Hancock, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of their knowledge:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.







Date:
June 9, 2008
















/s/ Jane F.
Aggers


Jane F.
Aggers


President
and Chief Executive Officer





/s/ Robert W.
Driskell


Robert W.
Driskell


Senior
Vice President and


Chief
Financial Officer


(Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### § 2700.437 What method do I use to communicate to a participant the requirements described in the OMB guidance at 2 CFR 180.435?

To communicate to a participant the requirements described in 2 CFR 180.435 of the OMB guidance, you must include a term or condition in the transaction that requires the participant's compliance with subpart C of 2 CFR part 180, as supplemented by subpart C of this part, and requires the participant to include a similar term or condition in lower-tier covered transactions.
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed May 17, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D23-22 Lower Tribunal No. F09-25236

________________ 

### Barton Hill, Appellant,
vs. 

### The State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Marisa Tinkler Mendez, Judge. Barton Hill, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Katryna Santa Cruz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Before HENDON, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
# L_2019072EN.01014102.xml

| 14.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 72/141 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 72/141

---

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EU) 2018/2025 of 17 December 2018 fixing for 2019 and 2020 the fishing opportunities for Union fishing vessels for certain deep-sea fish stocks

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 325 of 20 December 2018
  )

On page 17, in the table for red seabream (Pagellus bogaraveo):

Pagellus bogaraveo

for:

‘Zone: Union and international waters of 9 (1) (SBR/9-)’,

read:

‘Zone: Union and international waters of 9 (1) (SBR/09-)’.

---
#### Israel Marino PORTILLO, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-70356.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 11, 2005.*

Decided Oct. 18, 2005.

Israel Marino Portillo, Dodge City, KS, pro se.

Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration & Naturalization Service, Lagu-na Niguel, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, OIL, U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: HALL, T.G. NELSON, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Israel Marino Portillo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reconsider its decision summarily affirming an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for cancellation of removal. We dismiss Portillo’s petition for review because it was untimely. A petition for review must be filed “no later than 30 days after the date of the final order of removal.” 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1). The BIA denied Portillo’s motion to reconsider on December 22, 2003, and Portillo filed his petition for review with this court 32 days later, on January 23, 2004. Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction. *See Stone v. INS,*514 U.S. 386, 405, 115 S.Ct. 1537, 131 L.Ed.2d 465 (1995); *Sheviakov v. INS,*237 F.3d 1144, 1146 (9th Cir.2001) (the thirty day time limit is mandatory and jurisdictional).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
NUMBER 13-15-00334-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

ISAAC GONZALEZ, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE.

____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 24th District Court

of Victoria County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Isaac Gonzalez, proceeding pro se, attempts to appeal the May 20, 

2015 decision of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals’ denying his petition for writ of 

habeas corpus under article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure in cause 

number WR-64,680-03. Specifically, the Court of Criminal Appeals “denied without 
2

written order the application for writ of habeas corpus on the findings of the trial court 

without a hearing.” 

On August 3, 2015, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that it appeared that 

the order from which the appeal was taken was not an appealable order, and requested 

correction of this defect within ten days or the appeal would be dismissed. Appellant has 

failed to respond to the Court’s directive. 

As a general rule, an appeal in a criminal case may be taken only from a judgment 

of conviction. See Workman v. State, 343 S.W.2d 446, 447 (Tex. Crim. App. 1961). 

However, there are certain narrow exceptions. Wright v. State, 969 S.W.2d 588, 589 

(Tex. App.—Dallas 1998, no pet.) (listing exceptions). The order appellant complains of 

is not a judgment of conviction nor does it fall within any exception to the general rule. 

See id. Moreover, this court has no jurisdiction in criminal law matters pertaining to 

habeas corpus proceedings seeking relief from final felony convictions. See TEX. CODE 

CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07 § 3 (West, Westlaw through Ch. 46 2015 R.S.). 

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and 

appellant’s failure to respond to this Court’s notice, is of the opinion that the appeal should 

be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby DISMISSED 

FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. Pending motions, if any, are likewise DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. 

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the 3rd

day of September, 2015.
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,I, Gordon Ellis, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:1. To my knowledge, this report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2. To my knowledge, the information in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of International Absorbents Inc. as of April 30,2007.        Date: June 13, 2007 /s/  GORDON ELLIS    Gordon Ellis   *President and Chief Executive Officer*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S ANNUAL REPORT ON
FORM 10K FOR THE YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              FEB-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                           8,984
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   80,843
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     47,213
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               152,654
<PP&E>                                          78,740
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 337,362
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           73,231
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           213
<OTHER-SE>                                     173,427
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   337,362
<SALES>                                        371,018
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               371,018
<CGS>                                          205,581
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  205,581
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,023
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,490
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 36,149
<INCOME-TAX>                                    20,264
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,885
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,885
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.74
        

</TABLE>
### Geohydrologic summary of the Pearl River basin, Mississippi and Louisiana

By: Joseph W. Lang

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1899M

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **1**                            (1286 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Low-flow analysis of Pearl River at Jackson, Mississippi(1959)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Editorial Note on Part 14
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 14 appear at 88 FR 45065, July 14, 2023.

§ 14.65 Public inquiries and requests for advisory committee records. ( a ) Public inquiries on general committee matters, except requests for records, are to be directed to the Committee Management Officer in the Advisory Committee Oversight and Management Staff, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 32, Rm. 5103, Silver Spring, MD 20993.
( b ) Public inquiries on matters relating to a specific committee, except requests for records, are to be directed to the Designated Federal Officer or the designated agency employee listed in the Federal Register notices published under § 14.20.
( c ) Requests for public advisory committee records, including minutes, are to be made, to FDA's Division of Freedom of Information (the Freedom of Information Staff's address is available on the agency's web site at *http://www.fda.gov*) under § 20.40 and the related provisions of part 20.
[44 FR 22351, Apr. 13, 1979, as amended at 46 FR 8456, Jan. 27, 1981; 76 FR 31469, June 1, 2011; 78 FR 17087, Mar. 20, 2013; 79 FR 68114, Nov. 14, 2014]