alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                18 U.S.C.ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Metrisa, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned President, Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ JOHN E. WOLFE
   ------------------------
President, Chief Executive Officer,
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer


Date: August 13, 2002
§ 862.4 Prohibitions and penalties. ( a ) The following activities are prohibited by his part: ( 1 ) Operation or use of aircraft on lands or waters of designated sites.
( 2 ) Air delivery to or from designated sites.
( 3 ) Removal or movement of downed aircraft, or participation in the removal or movement of downed aircraft, from or on a designated site unless prior authorization is obtained pursuant to § 862.5 of this part.
( 4 ) Failure to remove a downed aircraft from a designated site in accordance with an order issued by the cognizant DOE Manager of Operations under § 862.5 of this part.
( 5 ) Violation of Federal Aviation Administration regulations regarding minimum altitudes and prohibited flight maneuvers over a designated site.
( b ) A person willfully engaging in activities prohibited by this part may be subject to the imposition of criminal penalties set forth in sections 223 and 229 of the Atomic Energy Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2273 and 2278(a)).
§ 1108.180 Expenditures. *Expenditures* mean charges made by a recipient or subrecipient to a project or program under an award. ( a ) The charges may be reported on a cash or accrual basis, as long as the methodology is disclosed and is consistently applied.
( b ) For reports prepared on a cash basis, expenditures are the sum of: ( 1 ) Cash disbursements for direct charges for property and services;
( 2 ) The amount of indirect expense charged;
( 3 ) The value of third-party in-kind contributions applied; and
( 4 ) The amount of cash advance payments and payments made to subrecipients.
( c ) For reports prepared on an accrual basis, expenditures are the sum of: ( 1 ) Cash disbursements for direct charges for property and services;
( 2 ) The amount of indirect expense incurred;
( 3 ) The value of third-party in-kind contributions applied; and
( 4 ) The net increase or decrease in the amounts owed by the recipient or subrecipient for: ( i ) Goods and other property received;
( ii ) Services performed by employees, contractors, subrecipients, and other payees; and
( iii ) Programs for which no current services or performance are required, such as annuities, insurance claims, or other benefit payments.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23
- 6185

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. NIGEL CLARKE , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Greenville

. Louise W. Flanagan , District Judge. ( 4:02

- cr - 00060

- FL

- 5; 4:10

- cv - 00195

- H )

Submitted : May 18 , 2023 Decided: Ma y 23, 2023

Before NIEMEYER, RICHARDSON, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Nigel Clarke, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-6185 Doc: 5 Filed: 05/23/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Nigel Clarke seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ.
P. 60(b) motion for relief from the district court’s prior order dismissing his initial 28 U.S.C. § 225 5 motion as time

- barred and from the court’s December 2020 order denying prior Rule 60(b) motions

. The order is n ot appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)( B )

. See generally United States v.
McRae , 793 F.3d 392, 400 & n.7 (4th Cir. 2015) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists c ould find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis , 580 U.S. 100, 115

- 17 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate bot h that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000))

. We have indep endently reviewed the record and conclude that Clarke has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pr esented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 23-6185 Doc: 5 Filed: 05/23/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



               Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Spyglass, Inc. of our report dated October 19, 1999, except for Note 14 as to
which the date is November 4, 1999, included in the 1999 Annual Report to
Stockholders of Spyglass, Inc.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Spyglass, Inc.
listed in Item 14(a). These schedules are the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In
our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered
in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly
in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-06943, 333-08255, 333-08253, 333-14643, 333-42511,
and 333-83211) and on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-95164, 33-95160, 33-95162,
33-95158, 333-2312, 333-04357, 333-40831, 333-47121, and 333-82351) of Spyglass,
Inc. of our report dated October 19, 1999, except for Note 15 as to which the
date is November 4, 1999, with respect to the financial statements incorporated
herein by reference, and our report included in the preceding paragraph with
respect to the financial statement schedule included in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) of Spyglass, Inc.


                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP




Chicago, Illinois
December 22, 1999
H. Res. 912

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 6, 2006.

Whereas life insurance is an essential part of a sound financial plan; 

Whereas life insurance provides financial security for families 

by helping surviving members meet immediate and longterm financial obligations and objectives in the event of 

a premature death in their family; 

Whereas approximately 68,000,000 United States citizens 

lack the adequate level of life insurance coverage needed 

to ensure a secure financial future for their loved ones; 

Whereas life insurance products protect against the uncertainties of life by enabling individuals and families to 

manage the financial risks of premature death, disability, 

and long-term care; 

Whereas individuals, families, and businesses can benefit 

from professional insurance and financial planning advice, including an assessment of their life insurance 

needs; and 

Whereas numerous groups supporting life insurance have designated September of 2006 as National Life Insurance 

Awareness Month as a means to encourage consumers to 

(1) become more aware of their life insurance needs; (2) 

seek professional advice regarding life insurance; and (3) 
2

•HRES 912 EH 

take the actions necessary to achieve financial security 

for their loved ones: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) supports the goals and ideals of National Life 

Insurance Awareness Month; and 

(2) requests that the President issue a proclamation 

calling on the Federal Government, States, localities, 

schools, nonprofit organizations, businesses, and the citizens of the United States to observe the month with appropriate programs and activities. 

Attest:

Clerk.
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 658 

Supporting the goals and ideals of World Water Day. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 31, 2006 

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas (for herself and Mr. BLUMENAUER) 

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on International Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of World Water Day. 

Whereas the global celebration of World Water Day is an initiative that grew out of the 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development in Rio de Janeiro; 

Whereas the United States General Assembly, via resolution, 

designated March 22 of each year as World Water Day; 

Whereas although water resources are renewable, differences 

in availability of water resources exist due to variations 

in seasonal and annual precipitation in different parts of 

the world; 

Whereas although water is the most widely occurring substance on earth, only 2.53 percent of all water is freshwater and the remainder is salt water; 
2 

•HRES 658 IH 

Whereas freshwater resources are further reduced by various 

forms of industrial, chemical, human, and agricultural 

pollution; 

Whereas the drainage of wetlands for agriculture and the dissipation of water sources by land clearance lead to further exacerbation of water scarcity; 

Whereas, according to the United Nations, by the middle of 

this century, at worst, seven billion people in 60 countries 

will be water-scarce; 

Whereas the poor are the most affected by water scarcity, 

with 50 percent of the populations of developing countries exposed to polluted water sources; 

Whereas water-related diseases are among the most common 

causes of illness and death, afflicting primarily the poor 

in developing countries; 

Whereas the estimated mortality rate due to diseases transmitted by water and sanitation is five million people per 

year; 

Whereas initiatives that promote access to safe drinking 

water and sanitation that prevents contaminants from infiltrating fresh drinking water supplies are vital tools in 

raising the awareness of the importance of freshwater to 

the quality of life; and 

Whereas freshwater is vital to the development, sustainability, 

and progression of all humanity: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of World 

3 Water Day; 
3 

•HRES 658 IH 

1 (2) recognizes the importance of conserving and 

2 managing water resources for sustainable develop3 ment, including environmental integrity and the 

4 eradication of poverty and hunger, and human 

5 health and overall quality of life in the United States 

6 and across the globe; and 

7 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

8 to observe World Water Day with appropriate rec9 ognition, ceremonies, activities, and programs to 

10 demonstrate the importance of water and water con11 servation to humanity. 

Æ
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

DAVID WAYNE WOODRING,

 Petitioner

 v.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,

BUREAU OF DRIVER LICENSING,

 Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 51 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Commonwealth Court

DAVID WAYNE WOODRING,

 Petitioner

 v.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,

BUREAU OF DRIVER LICENSING,

 Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 52 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 28th day of August, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1100 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide capital gains 

treatment for certain self-created musical works. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 23, 2005 

Mr. BUNNING (for himself, Mr. CONRAD, Mr. HATCH, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. ALEXANDER, and Mr. DURBIN) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

capital gains treatment for certain self-created musical 

works.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Songwriters Capital 

5 Gains Tax Equity Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CAPITAL GAINS TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN SELF7 CREATED MUSICAL WORKS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (b) of section 1221 of 

9 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to capital 
2

•S 1100 IS

1 asset defined) is amended by redesignating paragraph (3) 

2 as paragraph (4) and by inserting after paragraph (2) the 

3 following new paragraph: 

4 ‘‘(3) SALE OR EXCHANGE OF SELF-CREATED

5 MUSICAL WORKS.—At the election of the taxpayer, 

6 paragraphs (1) and (3) of subsection (a) shall not 

7 apply with respect to any sale or exchange of musi8 cal compositions or copyrights in musical works by 

9 a taxpayer described in subsection (a)(3).’’. 

10 (b) LIMITATION ON CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS.—

11 Subparagraph (A) of section 170(e)(1) of the Internal 

12 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting ‘‘(deter13 mined without regard to section 1221(b)(3))’’ after ‘‘long14 term capital gain’’. 

15 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

16 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

17 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Editorial Note on Part 17
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 17 appear at 68 FR 24879, May 9, 2003, and at 88 FR 45065, July 14, 2023.

§ 17.31 Form, filing, and service of papers. ( a ) *Form.* ( 1 ) Documents filed with Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852, shall include two copies (original and redacted version) for confidential petitions. Otherwise, only one copy is necessary.
( 2 ) The first page of every pleading and paper filed in the proceeding shall contain a caption setting forth the title of the action, the case number assigned by the Office of the Chief Counsel, and designation of the pleading or paper (e.g., “motion to quash subpoena”).
( 3 ) Every pleading shall be signed by, and shall contain the address and telephone number of, the party or the person on whose behalf the pleading was filed, or his or her counsel.
( 4 ) Pleadings or papers are considered filed when they are received by the Dockets Management Staff.
( b ) *Service.* A party filing a document with the Dockets Management Staff under this part shall, no later than the time of filing, serve a copy of such document on every other party. Service upon any party of any document, other than service of a complaint, shall be made by delivering a copy personally or by placing a copy of the document in the United States mail or express delivery service, postage prepaid and addressed, to the party's last known address. When a party is represented by counsel, service shall be made on such counsel in lieu of the actual party.
( c ) *Proof of service.* A certificate of the individual serving the document by personal delivery or by mail, setting forth the time and manner of service, shall be proof of service.
[60 FR 38626, July 27, 1995, as amended at 88 FR 45065, July 14, 2023]
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 905 

To amend title 17, United States Code, to provide that the first sale doctrine 

applies to any computer program that enables a machine or other product 

to operate, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2017 

Mr. FARENTHOLD (for himself and Mr. POLIS) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 17, United States Code, to provide that 

the first sale doctrine applies to any computer program 

that enables a machine or other product to operate, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘You Own Devices Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 905 IH

1 SEC. 2. FIRST SALE DOCTRINE AND CERTAIN COMPUTER 

2 PROGRAMS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 109 of title 17, United 

4 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing: 

6 ‘‘(f) TRANSFER OF CERTAIN COMPUTER PRO7 GRAMS.— 

8 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section 

9 106 or section 117, if a computer program enables 

10 any part of a machine or other product to operate, 

11 the owner of the machine or other product is entitled 

12 to transfer an authorized copy of the computer pro13 gram, or the right to obtain such copy, when the 

14 owner sells, leases, or otherwise transfers the ma15 chine or other product to another person. The right 

16 to transfer provided under this subsection may not 

17 be waived by any agreement. 

18 ‘‘(2) SECURITY AND ERROR CORRECTION.—Any 

19 right to receive modifications to the computer pro20 gram described in paragraph (1) relating in whole or 

21 in part to security or error correction that applied 

22 to the owner of the machine or other product de23 scribed in paragraph (1) shall apply to the person to 

24 whom the machine or product and the copy of the 

25 computer program are transferred. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 905 IH

1 ‘‘(3) TREATMENT OF UNAUTHORIZED COP2 IES.—Nothing in this subsection should be construed 

3 as permitting the owner of a machine or other prod4 uct to retain an unauthorized copy of the computer 

5 program described in paragraph (1) after transfer6 ring the machine or other product and the copy of 

7 the computer program to another person.’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enact10 ment of this Act and shall apply to transfers of computer 

11 programs occurring on or after such date. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear at 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

#### § 117.93 Warehousing and distribution.

Storage and transportation of food must be under conditions that will protect against allergen cross-contact and against biological, chemical (including radiological), and physical contamination of food, as well as against deterioration of the food and the container.
IV 

House Calendar No. 158 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 742 

[Report No. 109–401] 

Providing for further consideration of the bill (H.R. 609) to amend and 

extend the Higher Education Act of 1965. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2006 

Mr. BISHOP of Utah, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 

resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for further consideration of the bill (H.R. 609) 

to amend and extend the Higher Education Act of 1965. 

1 Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this 

2 resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of 

3 rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee 

4 of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further 

5 consideration of the bill (H.R. 609) to amend and extend 

6 the Higher Education Act of 1965. No further general de7 bate shall be in order. Notwithstanding clause 11 of rule 


HMOORE on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

HRES 742 RH 

1 XVIII, no further amendment shall be in order except 

2 those printed in the report of the Committee on Rules ac3 companying this resolution. Each such amendment may 

4 be offered only in the order printed in the report, may 

5 be offered only by a Member designated in the report, 

6 shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time 

7 specified in the report equally divided and controlled by 

8 the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to 

9 amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for divi10 sion of the question in the House or in the Committee 

11 of the Whole. All points of order against such amendments 

12 are waived. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill 

13 for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the 

14 bill to the House with such amendments as may have been 

15 adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in the 

16 House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of 

17 the Whole to the bill or to the amendment in the nature 

18 of a substitute made in order as original text. The previous 

19 question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and 

20 amendments thereto to final passage without intervening 

21 motion except one motion to recommit with or without in22 structions. 


HMOORE on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS

HMOORE on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
House Calendar No. 158 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 742 

[Report No. 109

–401] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for further consideration of the bill (H.R. 

Act of 1965. 609) to amend and extend the Higher Education 

MARCH 29, 2006 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


HMOORE on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of National Medical Health Card Systems, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending December 31, 2005, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Stuart Diamond, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Stuart  Diamond                                    |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Stuart Diamond                                         |
| Chief Financial  Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |
| September 15,  2006                               |

 

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q/A pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to theextent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the"Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to beincorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, asamended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Companyspecifically incorporates it by reference.

 

----