alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.2

# Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-21489, 333-21491 and 333-111618) pertaining to the 1995 Stock Plan for
Non-Employee Directors, 1995 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan and the 1999 Long-Term Stock
Incentive Plan of Systemax Inc. of our report dated March 27, 2007 at and for the year
ended December 31, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of Systemax Inc. in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
2006.

New York, New York
March 27, 2007
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 12, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40445

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE LUIS CORADO,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:03-CR-715-ALL

--------------------

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Luis

Corado has requested leave to withdraw from this appeal and has

filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967). Corado has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief

but has not filed a response. Our independent review of the

brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. 

Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
No. 05-40445

-2-

excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
Exhibit
32.1



Certification
of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18

U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In
connection with the amended annual report of Alphala Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended January
31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Shaikh M. Shami, certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The
    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                   
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                             
|2. | The
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
    of the Company.



|Date: | May
    28, 2014                                                                                                          | 
|----- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|      |                                                                                                                           | 
|By:   | /s/
    Shaikh M. Shami                                                                                                   | 
|      | Shaikh M. Shami                                                                                                           | 
|      | President, Chief
    Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer, Secretary, Treasurer, Director |
# m8856.docx

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 18.05.2018 C(2018) 3214 final To the notifying parties Subject : Case M. 8856 - ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND / CARGILL / JV EGYPT Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1 )( b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 1 and Article 57 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area 2 Dear Sir or Madam, 1. On 16 April 2018 , the European Commission received notification of a proposed conc entration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which the undertaking s Archer Daniels Midland Europ e B.V. (‘ADM’, The Netherlands) and Cargill International Luxembourg 2 Sàrl (‘Cargill’, Luxembourg ) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and Article 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control over the whole of the undertaking National Vegetable Oils Co (‘NVOC’, Egypt ) by way of a pu r chase of shares . 3 2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are: - for ADM, processing of oilseeds, corn, sugar, wheat and other agricultural commodities and a manufacturer of vegetable oils and fats, vegetable protein, meal, corn, sweeteners, flour, biodiesel, ethanol, and other value added food and feed ingredients, - for Cargill, international production and marketing of food, and agricultural and risk management products and services. Cargill’s businesses include grain and commodity merchandising, oilseed and grain processing and refining, flour milling, meat processing and financial services, - for NVOC, a soybean oil crush facility, that produces and sells crude soybean oil, soybean meal and soybean hulls in the Egyptian market. 3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5(a ) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 . 4 4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1 )( b) of the Merger Regulation and Article 57 of the EEA Agreement . For the Commission
( S igned)
Johannes LAITENBERGER Director-General
(1)
OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ( the ' Merger Regulation ' ). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( ' TFEU ' ) has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of ' Community ' by ' Union ' and ' common market ' by ' internal market ' . The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.
(2) OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3 ( the ' EEA Agreement ' ).
(3) Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 143 , 24 . 04 . 2018 , p. 10 .
(4)
OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5 .
§ 1309.34 Acceptance for filing; defective applications. ( a ) Applications submitted for filing are dated upon receipt. If the application is found to be complete, the application will be accepted for filing. Applications failing to comply with the requirements of this part will not be accepted for filing.
( b ) Accepting an application for filing does not preclude any subsequent request for additional information pursuant to § 1309.35 and has no bearing on whether the application will be granted.
[60 FR 32454, June 22, 1995, as amended at 87 FR 21023, Apr. 11, 2022]
§ 1.692 How do I request internal agency review of a denial of an application or waiver request upon reconsideration? ( a ) No later than 10 business days after the date of issuance of a denial of an application or waiver request upon reconsideration under § 1.691, the requestor may seek internal agency review of such denial under § 10.75(c)(1) of this chapter.
( b ) The request for internal agency review under paragraph (a) of this section must be signed by the requestor or by an individual authorized to act on its behalf in submitting the request for internal review. The request must be submitted electronically in English to the address specified in the denial upon reconsideration and must comply with procedures it describes.
( c ) Under § 10.75(d) of this chapter, internal agency review of such denial must be based on the information in the administrative file, which will include any supporting information submitted under § 1.691(c).
( d ) After completing the review and evaluation of the administrative file, FDA will notify the requestor of its decision to overturn the denial and grant the application or waiver request through issuance of an application or waiver request upon reconsideration or to affirm the denial of the application or waiver request upon reconsideration through issuance of a denial of an application or waiver request upon reconsideration.
( e ) Issuance by FDA of a denial of an application or waiver request upon reconsideration constitutes final agency action under 5 U.S.C. 702.
Table of Contents

Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the QuarterlyReport of Hutton Investors Futures Fund L.P. II (the‘‘Partnership’’) on Form 10-Q for the periodending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’),I, David J. Vogel, President and Director of Citigroup Managed FuturesLLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|  |           |                                                                                                                     |
|--|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (1)  | The Report fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |

|  |           |                                                                                                                                                        |
|--|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (2)  | The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Partnership. |

/s/David J. Vogel

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

David J.VogelCitigroup Managed Futures LLC President and Director

Date: August 14,2006

----
EERE Information Center Programs and Offices Search Help More Search Options

Printable Version 

## Small Electric Motors Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Analytical Spreadsheets The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) prepared the analytical spreadsheets listed below for the notice of proposed rulemaking stage of its energy conservation standards rulemaking on small electric motors. Instructions on how to use the National Impact Analysis and Manufacturer Impact Analysis spreadsheets can be found in the appendices to the Technical Support Document

. Life Cycle Cost Spreadsheet Small Electric Motors Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Spreadsheet ( Excel 1.6 MB )

National Impact Analysis National Impact Analysis Spreadsheet for Polyphase Small Electric Motors ( Excel 879 KB ) National Impact Analysis Spreadsheet for Single-Phase Small Electric Motors ( Excel 3.4 MB )

Manufacturer Impact Analysis Government Regulatory Impact Model for Small Electric Motors ( Excel 37 MB )



### Contact Information James Raba Project Manager 202-586-8654

Printable Version

Building Technologies Program Home | EERE Home | U.S. Department of Energy Webmaster | Web Site Policies | Security & Privacy | USA.gov Content Last Updated: 11/24/2009 

## Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards: Small Electric Motor... http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards /commercial...

1 of 1 12/1/2009 7:36 A M
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*January 15, 2008*

[Cite as *01/15/2008 Case Announcements,*2008-Ohio-97.]

MEDIATION REFERRALS

The following case has been returned to the regular docket pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(6)(E):

2007-2020.

#### State ex rel. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Indus. Comm.

Franklin App. No. 06AP-968, 2007-Ohio-4799.
x



P



gujarati · april 2003

1

2

3
nih publication no. 03-5058

ndep 52 - xx gujarati · april 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1070 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1070

       To suspend temporarily the duty on certain cases for toys.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 18, 2005

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To suspend temporarily the duty on certain cases for toys.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN CASES FOR TOYS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.42.02      Cases or            Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         containers                                                         31/2008
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         4202.12.80)
                         specially
                         designed,
                         marketed or
                         intended for
                         transporting,
                         storing or
                         protecting toys
                         or other articles
                         provided for in
                         headings 9502-
                         9504, inclusive..

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 1315

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part appear at 82 FR 97041, Dec. 30, 2016.

#### § 1315.01 Scope.

This part specifies procedures governing the establishment of an assessment of annual needs, procurement and manufacturing quotas pursuant to section 306 of the Act (21 U.S.C. 826), and import quotas pursuant to section 1002 of the Act (21 U.S.C. 952) for ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and phenylpropanolamine.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT C . KAUI JOC HANAN AM STER DAM , Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. OFFIC E OF HAWAIIAN AFFAIR S; e t a l., De fe nda

nts - Appe lle e s. No. 12-15672 D.C . No. 1:10-c v-00525-DAEB M K M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ha

wa ii David A. Ezra , Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d M arc h 10, 2014 ** B e fore : PR EGER SON, LEAVY, a n d M UR GUIA, C irc uit Judge s . C . Ka ui Joc ha n an Am ste rdam

a ppe a ls pro se from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt on the ple a dings in his ac tion a rising from

the Offic e of Ha

wa iia n Affa irs’ (“ OHA” ) fa ilure to providehim funds from

a public trust c re ate d by

the 

# FIL ED MAR 18 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S
. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).Hawa i i Adm ission Ac t (“ § 5(f) trust” ). W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C .

§ 1291. W e re vie wde novo. Mac Donald v
. Grac eC

hurc h Se attle , 457 F.3d 1079, 1081 (9th C ir. 2006). W e a ffirm . The distric t c ourt prope rly grante d judgm e nt on theple a dings on Am ste rdam ’ s bre a c h of trust c la im be c a u se Am ste rda

m fa ile d to a lle ge fa c ts showing tha

t de fe nda nts bre a c he d the te rm s of the § 5(f) trust by not providing him with trust funds. Se e Day v . Apoliona , 616 F.3d 918, 925-26 (9th C ir. 2010) (OHA truste e s, a lthough lim

ite d to spe nding § 5(f) trust funds for e num e rate d trust purpose s , “ have broa d disc re tion to de c ide how to se rve those purpose s ” ). The distric t c ourt prope rly grante d judgm e nt on theple a dings on Am ste rdam ’ s e qua l prote c tion c la im be c a use Am ste rda

m fa ile d to a lle ge fa c ts showing tha

t de fe nda nts inte ntiona lly

disc rim inate d a ga inst him ba se d on his m e m b e rship in a

prote c te d c la ss, or tha

t de fe nda nts inte ntiona lly

tre ate d him diffe re ntly

tha n othe r sim ila

rly situa te d individuals without a

rationa l ba sis. Se e Se rrano v . Franc is , 345 F.3d 1071, 1081-82 (9th C ir. 2003) (re quire m e nts for e qua l prote c tion c l a im ); se e also N . Pac ific a LLC

v . C ity of Pac ific a , 526 F.3d 478, 486 (9th C i r. 2008) (re quire m e nts for “ c la ss of one ” e qua l prote c t ion c la im ). The distric t c ourt prope rly grante d judgm e nt on theple a dings on Am ste rdam ’ s fre e spe e c h c la im be c a use Am ste rda

m fa ile d to a lle ge fa c ts showing
1 2 - 1 5 6 7 2 2that

de fe n da nts viola te d his First Am e ndm e nt rights by not providing Am s te rdam funds to tra

ve l to W a shington D.C . to m e e t with c ongre ssiona l re pre se ntative s. Se e Re gan v . Tax a tion W

i th Re pre se ntation of W

ashington , 461 U.S. 540, 546 (1983) (gove rnm e nt is not re quire d by the First Am e ndm e nt to subsidiz e lobby ing). AFFIRM E D.

1 2 - 1 5 6 7 2 3
**Exhibit 10.47**

**AMENDMENT TO**

**MEMC ELECTRONIC MATERIALS, INC.**

**STOCK UNIT AWARD AGREEMENT**

**ForOfficers (Time Vesting)**

**                    , 20    **

**2001 Equity Incentive Plan**

THIS AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT is effective                    , 20    , between MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc. (the “Company”) and                                 (the “Participant”). 

WHEREAS, the Company and Participant entered into an Agreement dated                     (the “Agreement”), whereby the Company granted to the Participant**            ** Stock Unit Awards pursuant to the MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc. 2001 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”); 

WHEREAS, the Company and the Participant now wish to amend the Agreement as provided herein; 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises set forth in this Agreement, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows: 

ARTICLE I. The third paragraph of subsection (a) of Section 4, entitled ***Distribution of Common Stock***, is amended and restated in its entirety asfollows: 

Notwithstanding the foregoing, unless the Committee otherwise determines at a later date, if within the two year period followinga Change in Control the Participant’s Employment is terminated by the Company without Cause or by the Participant for Good Reason, all of the Stock Unit Awards granted to the Participant hereby shall become vested as of the effective date ofthe termination of the Participant’s Employment with the Company. Notwithstanding the definition of “Good Reason” included in the Plan, for the purposes of this Agreement, clause (ii) of the definition of “Good Reason”shall mean “(ii) a material diminution in a Participant’s base salary. 

ARTICLE II. **Miscellaneous.**

***No Other Changes.*** Other than with respect to the Section of the Agreement specifically referenced above, this Amendment does not modify, change or delete any other addendum, term, provision, representation, warranty orcovenant (the “Provisions”) relating to or contained in the Agreement, and all such Provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 

 
**MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc.****By:** 
 
**Title:**
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0583

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

TAYLOR JAY DAMM,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including February 12, 2024, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 5 2024

01/05/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0583
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997             MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997             SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             455                      97
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     455                      97
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             7350                    6600
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         15000                   15000
<OTHER-SE>                                     (21895)                (21,503)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       455                      97
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                       0
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    84                      36
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (84)                    (36)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (84)                    (36)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 133.157 Part-skim mozzarella and scamorza cheese.

Part-skim mozzarella cheese, part-skim scamorza cheese conforms to the definition and standard of identity as prescribed for mozzarella cheese by § 133.155, except that its milk fat content, calculated on the solids basis, is less than 45 percent but not less than 30 percent.