alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             958,815
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      993,967
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (23,905)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,306,792
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,277,370
<PP&E>                                           1,700,547
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (1,537,745)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,440,172
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,072,648
<BONDS>                                             32,352
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,713,721
<COMMON>                                           374,030
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1,752,579)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,440,172
<SALES>                                          1,173,365
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,173,365
<CGS>                                              517,379
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      517,379
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   611,574
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  (2,171)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     46,583
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 46,583
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        46,583
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.01)


</TABLE>
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-11-00451-CV

TONY RAY MITCHELL,

Appellant

v.

PATRICIA K. HARRIS,

Appellee

From the County Court

Bosque County, Texas

Trial Court No. G-07087

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The Clerk of this Court notified Appellant by letter dated February 14, 2012 that 

the original filing fee of $175.00 had not been paid, that unless Appellant obtained 

indigent status, the filing fee’s payment is required, and that unless Appellant either 

paid the filing fee or obtained indigent status within fourteen days, the appeal would be 

dismissed without further notification. More than fourteen days have passed, and 

Appellant has not paid the filing fee or filed an affidavit of indigence.

The Clerk’s letter also notified Appellant that the Court had not received the 
Mitchell v. Harris Page 2

docketing statement in this appeal and that if the docketing statement was not filed 

within 14 days, the appeal would be dismissed without further notification. More than 

fourteen days have passed, and Appellant has not filed the docketing statement.

This appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b, c); 10TH TEX. APP. (WACO)

LOC. R. 5(c).

Absent a specific exemption, the Clerk of the Court must collect filing fees at the 

time a document is presented for filing. TEX. R. APP. P. 12.1(b); Appendix to TEX. R. APP.

P., Order Regarding Fees (Amended Aug. 28, 2007, eff. Sept. 1, 2007); see also TEX. R.

APP. P. 5; 10TH TEX. APP. (WACO) LOC. R. 5; TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 51.207(b); § 

51.941(a) (West 2005); § 51.208 (West Supp. 2011). Under these circumstances, we 

suspend the rule and order the Clerk to write off all unpaid filing fees in this case. TEX.

R. APP. P. 2. The write-off of the fees from the accounts receivable of the Court does not 

eliminate the fees owed by Appellant.

REX D. DAVIS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and 

Justice Scoggins

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed March 14, 2012

[CV06]
Order entered November 30, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00861-CR

TERRANCE JARMELL DUNN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F14-17929-R

ORDER

We REINSTATE this appeal.

On November 2, 2016, we granted the State’s motion and ordered the trial court to make 

written findings of fact and conclusions of law on the admissibility of appellant’s oral statement 

as mandated by section 6 of article 38.22. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 38.22, § 6 

(West Supp. 2016). On November 21, 2016, a supplemental clerk’s record containing the 

written findings of fact and conclusions of law was filed with this Court.

We GRANT the State’s November 29, 2016 motion to extend time to file the State’s 

brief, and ORDER the State’s brief received on November 23, 2016 filed as of the date of this 
order. 

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
Editorial Note on Part 170
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 170 appear at 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001, and 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004.

§ 170.15 Adoption of regulation on initiative of Commissioner. ( a ) The Commissioner upon his own initiative may propose the issuance of a regulation prescribing, with respect to any particular use of a food additive, the conditions under which such additive may be safely used. Notice of such proposal shall be published in the Federal Register and shall state the reasons for the proposal.
( b ) Action upon a proposal made by the Commissioner shall proceed as provided in part 10 of this chapter.
[42 FR 14486, Mar. 15, 1977, as amended at 42 FR 15673, Mar. 22, 1977]
#### § 1210.11 Sanitary inspection of dairy farms.

The sanitary conditions of any dairy farm producing milk or cream to be shipped or transported into the United States or to a plant from which milk or cream is to be shipped or transported into the United States must score at least 50 points out of 100 points, according to the methods for scoring as provided by the score card for sanitary inspection of dairy farms in the form prescribed by the Secretary.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

Issued by the Department of Transportation 

on the 26th day of June, 2014 

 Essential Air Service at 

 MERCED, CALIFORNIA 

 VISALIA, CALIFORNIA

Under 49 U.S. C. § 47131 et seq. 

 DOCKET DOT-OST-1998-3521 

 DOCKET DOT-OST-2004-19916 

 

NOTICE EXTENDING THE DEADLINE FOR PROPOSALS 

By Order 2014-5-9, issued on May 21, 2014, the Department requested proposals for Essential 

Air Service (EAS) at Merced and Visalia, California, with proposals due no later than 

June 27, 2014. On June 26, 2014, Mokulele Airlines requested an extension to that deadline, 

until July 11, 2014. In that request, Mr. Ron Hansen, Chief Operating Officer of Mokulele 

Airlines, explained that due to the Department’s issuance of Order 2014-6-6, on June 24, 2014, 

which terminated the EAS eligibility of Merced, the air carrier needs additional time to evaluate 

Visalia’s market, and would like to meet with the city of Merced to discuss its future air 

transportation options. 

We will grant the extension request. Proposals for the above communities are now due 

July 11, 2014. Air carriers should be very clear as to whether a specific community’s proposal is 

on a stand-alone basis, or whether it is part of a larger, inseparable package with the other 

community.

KEVIN D. SCHLEMMER 

Chief, EAS and Domestic Analysis Division 

An electronic version of this document is available at 

http://www.regulations.gov
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1087 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1087

To ensure America's law enforcement officers have access to lifesaving 
  equipment needed to defend themselves and civilians from attacks by 
                   terrorists and violent criminals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 10, 2017

 Mr. Toomey (for himself and Mr. Blunt) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To ensure America's law enforcement officers have access to lifesaving 
  equipment needed to defend themselves and civilians from attacks by 
                   terrorists and violent criminals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Lifesaving Gear for Police Act''.

SEC. 2. STATE AND LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT ACCESS TO LIFESAVING FEDERAL 
              EQUIPMENT.

    (a) Unenforceability of Certain Regulations Unless Enacted Into 
Law.--
            (1) In general.--No regulation, rule, guidance, policy, or 
        recommendations issued on or after May 15, 2015, that limits 
        the sale or donation of property of the Federal Government, 
        including excess property of the Department of Defense, to 
        State and local agencies for law enforcement activities 
        (whether pursuant to section 2576a of title 10, United States 
        Code, or any other provision of law, or as a condition on the 
        use of Federal funds) shall have any force or effect after the 
        date of the enactment of this Act unless enacted into law by 
        Congress.
            (2) Prohibition on use of funds to enforce regulations.--No 
        agency or instrumentality of the Federal Government may use any 
        Federal funds, fees, or resources to implement or carry out a 
        regulation, rule, guidance, policy, or recommendation issued as 
        described in subsection (a) that is not enacted into law by 
        Congress.
    (b) Return or Reissue of Equipment Recalled or Seized Pursuant to 
Regulations.--Any property recalled or seized on or after May 15, 2015, 
pursuant to a regulation, rule, guidance, policy, or recommendation 
issued as described in subsection (a) shall be returned, replaced, or 
re-issued to the agency from which recalled or seized, at no cost to 
such agency, as soon as practicable after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2021048DE.01002301.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 11.2.2021 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 48/23 |

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) 2018/1832 der Kommission vom 5. November 2018 zur Änderung der Richtlinie 2007/46/EG des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates, der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 692/2008 der Kommission und der Verordnung (EU) 2017/1151 der Kommission im Hinblick auf die Verbesserung der emissionsbezogenen Typgenehmigungsprüfungen und -verfahren für leichte Personenkraftwagen und Nutzfahrzeuge, unter anderem in Bezug auf die Übereinstimmung in Betrieb befindlicher Fahrzeuge und auf Emissionen im praktischen Fahrbetrieb und zur Einführung von Einrichtungen zur Überwachung des Kraftstoff- und des Stromverbrauchs

(
[Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 301, 27. November 2018](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2018_301_R_TOC)
)

Seite 14, Anhang I Nummer 9 zur Änderung von Anhang I der Verordnung (EU) 2017/1151, Nummer 4.1.2 Absatz 1:

Anstatt:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| „‚4.1.2. | Der Hersteller überprüft die Übereinstimmung der Produktion durch die Prüfung der Schadstoffemissionen (gemäß Tabelle 2 in Anhang I der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 715/2007), der CO2-Emissionen (zusammen mit der Messung des Stromverbrauchs ‚EC‘ und ggf. der Genauigkeit der OBFCM-Einrichtung), der Emissionen aus dem Kurbelgehäuse, der Verdunstungsemissionen und des OBD-Systems im Einklang mit den Prüfverfahren gemäß den Anhängen V, VI, XI, XXI und XXII. Die Überprüfung umfasst daher die Prüfungen der Typen 1, 3 und 4 sowie die OBD-Prüfung, wie in Abschnitt 2.4 beschrieben.“ |

muss es heißen:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| „‚4.1.2. | Der Hersteller überprüft die Übereinstimmung der Produktion durch die Prüfung der Schadstoffemissionen (gemäß Tabelle 2 in Anhang I der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 715/2007), der CO2-Emissionen (zusammen mit der Messung des Stromverbrauchs ‚EC‘ und ggf. der Überwachung der Genauigkeit der OBFCM-Einrichtung), der Emissionen aus dem Kurbelgehäuse, der Verdunstungsemissionen und des OBD-Systems im Einklang mit den Prüfverfahren gemäß den Anhängen V, VI, XI, XXI und XXII. Die Überprüfung umfasst daher die Prüfungen der Typen 1, 3 und 4 sowie die OBD-Prüfung, wie in Abschnitt 2.4 beschrieben.“ |

---
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Southwall Technologies Inc. (the “Company”), for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mr. Dennis Capovilla, the Principal Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) that:
 
 1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date:    August 20, 2010
By:
/s/ Dennis F. CapovillaDennis F. CapovillaChief Executive Officer
 
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 1305.07 Special procedure for filling certain orders. A supplier of thiafentanil, carfentanil, etorphine hydrochloride, or diprenorphine, if he or she determines that the purchaser is a veterinarian engaged in zoo and exotic animal practice, wildlife management programs, or research, and is authorized by the Administrator to handle these substances, may fill the order in accordance with the procedures set forth in § 1305.17 except that: ( a ) A DEA Form 222 or an electronic order for thiafentanil, carfentanil, etorphine hydrochloride, and diprenorphine must contain only these substances in reasonable quantities.
( b ) The substances must be shipped, under secure conditions using substantial packaging material with no markings on the outside that would indicate the content, only to the purchaser's registered location.
[70 FR 16911, Apr. 1, 2005, as amended at 81 FR 58839, Aug. 26, 2016]
# m8961.docx

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 12.6.2018 C(2018) 3843 final To the notifying parties: Subject : Case M. 8961 – HPS / MDP / PFP Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 1 and Article 57 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area 2 Dear Sir or Madam, 1. On 18 May 2018 , the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which HP S Investment Partners, LLC ("HPS", USA) and Madison Dearborn Partners, LLC ("MDP", USA) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the whole of Professional Fee Protection Limited ("PFP", United Kingdom) by way of purchase of shares . 3 2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are: - HPS is a US-based investment firm with a focus on acquisitions and strategic financing or recapitalisation of companies that require financial assistance ; - MDP is a US-based private equity investment firm ; - PFP is a small UK provider of risk management services and tax advisory services. 3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5 ( c ) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 . 4 4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation and Article 57 of the EEA Agreement . For the Commission
(S igned)
Johannes LAITENBERGER Director - General
(1)
OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ( the ' Merger Regulation ' ). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( ' TFEU ' ) has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of ' Community ' by ' Union ' and ' common market ' by ' internal market ' . The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.
(2) OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3 ( the ' EEA Agreement ' ).
(3) Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 181 , 28.05.2018 , p. 12 .
(4)
OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5 .
§ 1140.14 Additional responsibilities of retailers. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70486 , Aug. 30, 2024.
( a ) In addition to the other requirements under this part, each cigarette and smokeless tobacco retailer is responsible for ensuring that all sales of cigarettes or smokeless tobacco to any person comply with the following requirements: ( 1 ) No retailer may sell cigarettes or smokeless tobacco to any person younger than 18 years of age;
( 2 ) ( i ) Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (a)(2)(ii) of this section and in § 1140.16(c)(2)(i), each retailer must verify by means of photographic identification containing the bearer's date of birth that no person purchasing the product is younger than 18 years of age;
( ii ) No such verification is required for any person over the age of 26;
( 3 ) Except as otherwise provided in § 1140.16(c)(2)(ii), a retailer may sell cigarettes or smokeless tobacco only in a direct, face-to-face exchange without the assistance of any electronic or mechanical device (such as a vending machine);
( 4 ) No retailer may break or otherwise open any cigarette or smokeless tobacco package to sell or distribute individual cigarettes or a number of unpackaged cigarettes that is smaller than the quantity in the minimum cigarette package size defined in § 1140.16(b), or any quantity of cigarette tobacco or smokeless tobacco that is smaller than the smallest package distributed by the manufacturer for individual consumer use; and
( 5 ) Each retailer must ensure that all self-service displays, advertising, labeling, and other items, that are located in the retailer's establishment and that do not comply with the requirements of this part, are removed or are brought into compliance with the requirements under this part.
( b ) Notwithstanding the requirements in paragraph (a) of this section and in addition to the other requirements under this part, each retailer of covered tobacco products is responsible for ensuring that all sales of such covered tobacco products to any person comply with the following requirements: ( 1 ) No retailer may sell covered tobacco products to any person younger than 18 years of age;
( 2 ) ( i ) Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (a)(2)(ii) of this section and in § 1140.16(c)(2)(i), each retailer must verify by means of photographic identification containing the bearer's date of birth that no person purchasing the product is younger than 18 years of age;
( ii ) No such verification is required for any person over the age of 26; and
( 3 ) A retailer may not sell covered tobacco products with the assistance of any electronic or mechanical device (such as a vending machine), except in facilities where the retailer ensures that no person younger than 18 years of age is present, or permitted to enter, at any time.
[81 FR 29103, May 10, 2016]
§ 145.136 Artificially sweetened canned fruit cocktail. ( a ) Artificially sweetened canned fruit cocktail is the food which conforms to the definition and standard of identity prescribed for canned fruit cocktail by § 145.135(a), except that in lieu of a packing medium specified in § 145.135(a)(3), the packing medium used is water artificially sweetened with saccharin, sodium saccharin, or a combination of both. Such packing medium may be thickened with pectin and may contain any mixture of any edible organic salt or salts and any edible organic acid or acids as a flavor-enhancing agent, in a quantity not more than is reasonably required for that purpose.
( b ) ( 1 ) The specified name of the food is “artificially sweetened fruit cocktail”.
( 2 ) The artificially sweetened food is subject to the requirements for label statement of ingredients used, as prescribed for canned fruit cocktail by § 145.135(a). If the packing medium is thickened with pectin, the label shall bear the statement “thickened with pectin”. When any organic salt or acid or any mixture of two or more of these is added, the label shall bear the common or usual name of each such ingredient.
[42 FR 14414, Mar. 15, 1977, as amended at 58 FR 2880, Jan. 6, 1993]
p.1 

OAR Box 1147 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

170) IV-E-43 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 4/22/2008 2:42:56 PM Sheet 170 of 242 
^

e

! ! % 

P.2 

T

i UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

ANN ARBOR. MICHIGA N 48105 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: Vapor Space Requirement for Fuel Tanks 

FROM: John F. Anderson, Senior Project Manager 

Standards Development and Support Branch 

TO: Public Docket A-87-11 

In response to this request I wag contacted by Lois 

Freeman, who gave me general information about this area. For 

example, she indicated that on average 18 percent of the fuel 

tank volume is vapor space, but that -it varies by plus or 

minus 7 percent as a function of such factors as tank location, 

vent line location, and various performance criteria (e.g., 

heat effects, vehicle cornering, etc). For further detail 

about what the specific performance criteria are, she referred 

me to a section in the GM comments (Volume ?.B, Attachment XV-3, 

Corporate Fuel Supply Design Guidelines, supplied in response 

to NHTSA question 11 of the followup letter we had sent to GM 

after the onboard hearings). 

Upon consulting the reference, I found it to be a listing 

of numerous procedures used to evaluate various aspects of fuel 

system performance. From that list I identified 19 specific 

items of interest and requested copies from GM. Further 

analvsis will await receipt of those documents.