alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2022181DE.01003701.xml

| 7.7.2022 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 181/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2022

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 181/37

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) 2018/1862 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 28. November 2018 über die Einrichtung, den Betrieb und die Nutzung des Schengener Informationssystems (SIS) im Bereich der polizeilichen Zusammenarbeit und der justiziellen Zusammenarbeit in Strafsachen, zur Änderung und Aufhebung des Beschlusses 2007/533/JI des Rates und zur Aufhebung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1986/2006 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates und des Beschlusses 2010/261/EU der Kommission

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 312 vom 7. Dezember 2018
  )

Seite 82, Artikel 37 Absatz 1 einleitender Teil:

Anstatt:

„(1)   Für verdeckte Kontrollen, für Ermittlungsanfragen oder für gezielte Kontrollen sollte der vollziehende Mitgliedstaat die nachstehenden Informationen ganz oder teilweise einholen und dem ausschreibenden Mitgliedstaat übermitteln:“

muss es heißen:

„(1)   Für verdeckte Kontrollen, für Ermittlungsanfragen oder für gezielte Kontrollen muss der vollziehende Mitgliedstaat die nachstehenden Informationen ganz oder teilweise einholen und dem ausschreibenden Mitgliedstaat übermitteln:“.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 Certification
 Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 (Subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code)
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Southwall Technologies Inc.
(the “Company”), for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mr.
Dennis Capovilla, the Principal Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)
that:
 
 (1)
  The Report of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
  
 Date: November 24,
      2009
              By:
              /s/   Dennis F.
      CapovillaDennis
      F. CapovillaChief
      Executive Officer
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                              EX-21
     <S>                                                      <C>


                          SIGCORP, Inc.

                  SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


            Southern Indiana Gas and Electric Company

       Southern Indiana Properties, Incorporated in Indiana

          Energy Systems Group, Incorporated in Indiana

        Southern Indiana Minerals, Incorporated in Indiana

         SIGCORP Energy Services, Incorporated in Indiana

             SIGCORP Capital, Incorporated in Indiana

              SIGCORP Fuels, Incorporated in Indiana

         SIGCORP Power Marketing, Incorporated in Indiana

     SIGCORP Communications Services, Incorporated in Indiana

     SIGECO Advanced Communications, Incorporated in Indiana

     SIGCORP Environmental Services, Incorporated in Indiana
</TABLE>
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXA S NO. WR-85,297-01

EX P ARTE CLYDE LAVERNE FISHER, III, App licant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. CM-14- 527 A IN THE 369TH DISTRICT COURT

F ROM LEON COUNTY
Per curiam . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisions of Ar t i cl e 1 1
. 07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W
. 2 d 8 2 4 , 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleade d g uilty to eng ag ing in org anized criminal activity , and was sentenc ed to eig hteen y ear s’ imprisonment. He did not appea l his conviction. Applicant contends that his plea was involun tary beca use he was advised incorre ctly reg arding parole elig ibilit y . Appar ently , neither his trial counsel nor the trial prosec utor was awa re of a r ece nt chang e in the law adding eng ag ing in org anized criminal activity to the list of offense s2

for which an inmate must serve at least one-ha lf of his sentenc e in flat time befor e becoming elig ible for parole
. Applicant al leg es that parole elig ibilit y was a primary conce rn for him during plea neg otiations, a

nd that he was incorre ctly advised that he would be e ligible f or par ole when his flat time plus his g ood time added up to one-qua rter of his sentenc e. Applicant alleg es that he would not have ag ree d to ple ad g uilty in e x chang e for an eig hteen- y ear sentenc e had he known that he would have to se rve one -half of

the sentenc e in flat time bef ore be comingelig ible for pa role. Applicant’s trial counsel and the trial prosec utor both acknow ledg e that they wer e unawa re of the chang e in the law, and the parties ag ree that Applicant should be allowed to withdraw his plea. The trial c ourt rec ommends that relief be g rante d. Relief is g rante d. The judgme nt in Cause No. CM-14-527-A in the 369th District Court of L eon C ounty is set aside, and A pplicant is remande d to the custody of the S heriff of L eon C ounty to answe r t he charg es as set out in the i ndictment. The trial court shall issue any nece ssary bench
war rant within 10 day s after

the mandate of this Court issues. Copies of this opinion s h a ll b e s e nt to th e T e xa s D epar tment of Criminal J ustice–Corre ctional I nstitut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Deliver ed: J uly

27, 2016 Do not publish
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350
(Section 906 of the SarbanesOxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the filing by Hospitality Properties Trust (the "Company") of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2008 (the "Report"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:



/s/ BARRY M. PORTNOY Barry M. Portnoy Managing Trustee

/s/ JOHN G. MURRAY John G. Murray President and Chief Operating Officer/s/ ADAM D. PORTNOY Adam D. Portnoy Managing Trustee

/s/ MARK L. KLEIFGES Mark L. Kleifges Treasurer and Chief Financial OfficerDate: March 2, 2009


---



QuickLinks
Editorial Note on Part 112
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 112 appear at 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 112.116 What measures must I take when using food-packing (including food packaging) material? ( a ) You must use food-packing material that is adequate for its intended use, which includes being: ( 1 ) Cleanable or designed for single use; and
( 2 ) Unlikely to support growth or transfer of bacteria.
( b ) If you reuse food-packing material, you must take adequate steps to ensure that food contact surfaces are clean, such as by cleaning food-packing containers or using a clean liner.
###### Editorial Note on Part 178

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 178 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 70 FR 72074, Dec. 1, 2005; and 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

#### § 178.3850 Reinforced wax.

Reinforced wax may be safely used as an article or component of articles intended for use in producing, manufacturing, packing, processing, transporting, or holding food subject to the provisions of this section.

(a) Reinforced wax consists of petroleum wax to which have been added certain optional substances required in its production, or added to impart desired physical or technical properties.

(b) The quantity of any optional adjuvant substance employed in the production of or added to reinforced wax does not exceed the amount reasonably required to accomplish the intended physical or technical effect or any limitation provided in this section.

(c) Any substance employed in the production of reinforced wax, including any optional substance, that is the subject of a regulation in parts 174, 175, 176, 177, 178 and § 179.45 of this chapter, conforms with any specification in such regulation.

(d) The substances and optional adjuvant substances employed in the production of or added to reinforced wax include:

(1) Substances generally recognized as safe in food.

(2) Substances subject to prior sanction for use in reinforced wax and used in accordance with such sanction or approval.

(3) Substances identified in this subparagraph and subject to any limitations provided therein:

| List of substances | Limitations |
| --- | --- |
| Copolymer of isobutylene modified with isoprene | |
| Petroleum wax, Type I and Type II | |
| Polyethylene | |
| Rosins and rosin derivatives as provided in § 178.3870 | |
| Synthetic wax polymer as described in § 176.170(a)(5) of this chapter | Not to exceed 5 percent by weight of the petroleum wax. |

(e) Reinforced wax conforming with the specifications in this paragraph is used as provided in paragraph (e)(2) of this section.

(1) The chloroform-soluble portion of the water extract obtained by exposing reinforced wax to demineralized water at 70 °F for 48 hours shall not exceed 0.5 milligram per square inch of food-contact surface.

(2) It is used as a packaging material or component of packaging materials for cheese and cheese products.

[42 FR 14609, Mar. 15, 1977, as amended at 47 FR 1288, Jan. 12, 1982]
#### § 160.100 Eggs.

No regulation shall be promulgated fixing and establishing a reasonable definition and standard of identity for the food commonly known as eggs.
#### Michalow Nomination

*Thomas C. Moore,*for petitioner.

*Donald S. Mills,*for board of elections.

*608August 8, 1949.

Aponick, J.,

This is on a petition to set aside a nomination petition. The proceedings are under section 977 of the Election Code of June 3,1937, P. L. 1333, 25 PS §2937. The objection is that Andrew Michalow, candidate for alderman in the third ward of the City of Wilkes-Barre, will not have been a resident of the third ward of the City of Wilkes-Barre for one whole year next preceding the election of November 8, 1949, as required by article Y, sec. 11 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania.

It is conceded that Michalow will not have been a resident of the ward for one year on November 8,1949.

The question of law before us is whether we have jurisdiction to inquire into qualifications of candidates in the proceedings. While we are impressed with the objector’s argument that the disqualification in this case cannot possibly be removed before the November election and for that reason the instant case is distinguishable from Maxman’s Nomination Petition, 49 D. & C. 141; and being mindful that lower courts have in some cases set aside nomination petitions where the disqualification existed, though not apparent on the face of the nomination petition, we nonetheless prefer to follow the reasoning in the Maxman case that our authority comes exclusively from the above section of the act. As we read the section, it is not broad enough to include disqualification as an objection.

We likewise point out that in doubtful cases, the doubt should be resolved in favor of the nomination petition, a result which is more consistent with the object of the act, which is to give the electors greater freedom to vote for whom they choose.

The petition of Charles Thomas to set aside the nomination petition of Andrew Michalow for the office of alderman of the third ward of the City of Wilkes-Barre, is dismissed at the cost of petitioner, Charles Thomas.
Exhibit 31.4**CERTIFICATION**I, Uzi Sasson, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of IXYS Corporation; and2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport.Date: July 30, 2007                                                      /s/ Uzi Sasson   Uzi Sasson, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer   and Vice President of Finance
#### § 119.1 Dietary supplements containing ephedrine alkaloids.

Dietary supplements containing ephedrine alkaloids present an unreasonable risk of illness or injury under conditions of use recommended or suggested in the labeling, or if no conditions of use are recommended or suggested in the labeling, under ordinary conditions of use. Therefore, dietary supplements containing ephedrine alkaloids are adulterated under section 402(f)(1)(A) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.

[69 FR 6853, Feb. 11, 2004]
Editorial Note on Part 177
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 177 appear at 61 FR 14482, Apr. 2, 1996; 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001; 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001; 68 FR 15355, Mar. 31, 2003; 70 FR 72074, Dec. 1, 2005; and 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 177.2250 Filters, microporous polymeric. Microporous polymeric filters identified in paragraph (a) of this section may be safely used, subject to the provisions of this section, to remove particles of insoluble matter in producing, manufacturing, processing, and preparing bulk quantities of liquid food. ( a ) Microporous polymeric filters consist of a suitably permeable, continuous, polymeric matrix of polyvinyl chloride, vinyl chloride-propylene, or vinyl chloride-vinyl acetate, in which finely divided silicon dioxide is embedded. Cyclohexanone may be used as a solvent in the production of the filters.
( b ) Any substance employed in the production of microporous polymeric filters that is the subject of a regulation in parts 170 through 189 of this chapter must conform with any specification in such regulation.
( c ) Cyclohexanone when used as a solvent in the production of the filters shall not exceed 0.35 percent by weight of the microporous polymeric filters.
( d ) The microporous polymeric filters may be colored with colorants used in accordance with § 178.3297 of this chapter.
( e ) The temperature of food being processed through the microporous polymeric filters shall not exceed 180 °F.
( f ) The microporous polymeric filters shall be maintained in a sanitary manner in accordance with good manufacturing practice so as to prevent potential microbial adulteration of the food.
( g ) To assure safe use of the microporous polymeric filters, the label or labeling shall include adequate directions for a pre-use treatment, consisting of washing with a minimum of 2 gallons of potable water at a temperature of 180 °F for each square foot of filter, prior to the filter's first use in contact with food.
[42 FR 14572, Mar. 15, 1977, as amended at 56 FR 42933, Aug. 30, 1991]
EXHIBIT 32

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CirTran Corporation on Form 10-QSB
for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Iehab Hawatmeh, President and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

May 20, 2005
                                /s/ Iehab J. Hawatmeh
                                ------------------------------------------
                                Iehab J. Hawatmeh
                                President and Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7177 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7177

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 4, 2024

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend title 28, United States Code, to consolidate certain divisions 
                  in the Northern District of Alabama.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONSOLIDATION OF CERTAIN DIVISIONS IN THE NORTHERN DISTRICT 
              OF ALABAMA.

    Section 81(a) of title 28, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking 
        ``seven'' and inserting ``five'';
            (2) in paragraph (1), by striking ``and Lauderdale'' and 
        inserting ``Lauderdale, and Lawrence'';
            (3) in paragraph (2)--
                    (A) by striking ``Lawrence,'';
                    (B) by inserting after ``Madison,'' the following: 
                ``Marshall,''; and
                    (C) by striking ``and Decatur'';
            (4) in paragraph (4), by striking ``Clay, Cleburne,'' and 
        inserting ``Cherokee, Clay, Cleburne, DeKalb, Etowah, Saint 
        Clair,'';
            (5) in paragraph (5), by striking ``Greene, Pickens, 
        Sumter, and Tuscaloosa'' and inserting ``Fayette, Greene, 
        Lamar, Marion, Pickens, Sumter, Tuscaloosa, Walker, and 
        Winston'';
            (6) by striking paragraph (6); and
            (7) by striking paragraph (7).

            Passed the House of Representatives December 3, 2024.

            Attest:

                                             KEVIN F. MCCUMBER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
§ 1308.35 Exemption of certain cannabis plant material, and products made therefrom, that contain tetrahydrocannabinols. ( a ) Any processed plant material or animal feed mixture containing any amount of tetrahydrocannabinols (THC) that is both: ( 1 ) Made from any portion of a plant of the genus Cannabis excluded from the definition of marijuana under the Act [i.e., the mature stalks of such plant, fiber produced from such stalks, oil or cake made from the seeds of such plant, any other compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of such mature stalks (except the resin extracted therefrom), fiber, oil, or cake, or the sterilized seed of such plant which is incapable of germination] and
( 2 ) Not used, or intended for use, for human consumption, has been exempted by the Administrator from the application of the Act and this chapter.
( b ) As used in this section, the following terms shall have the meanings specified: ( 1 ) The term *processed plant material* means cannabis plant material that has been subject to industrial processes, or mixed with other ingredients, such that it cannot readily be converted into any form that can be used for human consumption.
( 2 ) The term *animal feed mixture* means sterilized cannabis seeds mixed with other ingredients (not derived from the cannabis plant) in a formulation that is designed, marketed, and distributed for animal consumption (and not for human consumption).
( 3 ) The term *used for human consumption* means either: ( i ) Ingested orally or
( ii ) Applied by any means such that THC enters the human body.
( 4 ) The term *intended for use for human consumption* means any of the following: ( i ) Designed by the manufacturer for human consumption;
( ii ) Marketed for human consumption; or
( iii ) Distributed, exported, or imported, with the intent that it be used for human consumption.
( c ) In any proceeding arising under the Act or this chapter, the burden of going forward with the evidence that a material, compound, mixture, or preparation containing THC is exempt from control pursuant to this section shall be upon the person claiming such exemption, as set forth in section 515(a)(1) of the Act (21 U.S.C. 885(a)(1)). In order to meet this burden with respect to a product or plant material that has not been expressly exempted from control by the Administrator pursuant to § 1308.23, the person claiming the exemption must present rigorous scientific evidence, including well-documented scientific studies by experts trained and qualified to evaluate the effects of drugs on humans.
[66 FR 51544, Oct. 9, 2001]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       2,441,803
<SECURITIES>                                 6,918,490
<RECEIVABLES>                                   52,015
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,493,818
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,446,386
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          155,483
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,290,903
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,446,386
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               345,567
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               246,690
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 98,877
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             98,877
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    98,877
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>