alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



Section 1350 Certification



In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Bright Mountain Acquisition Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, W. Kip Speyer, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, and Annette Casacci, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|   |                                                                                                                                  
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and



|   |                                                                                                                                                      
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company.



|              |  |                                                                                                         
|------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|April 1, 2015 |  | /s/ W. Kip Speyer
W. Kip Speyer, Chief Executive Officer, principal executive officer                   
|              |  |                                                                                                         
|April 1, 2015 |  | /s/ Annette Casacci
Annette Casacci, Chief Financial Officer, principal financial and accounting officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 1002.41 Disposition of records obtained by dealers and distributors. ( a ) Information obtained by dealers and distributors pursuant to § 1002.40 shall immediately be forwarded to the appropriate manufacturer unless: ( 1 ) The dealer or distributor elects to hold and preserve such information and to immediately furnish it to the manufacturer when advised by the manufacturer or the Director, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, that such information is required for purposes of section 535 of the Act; and
( 2 ) The dealer or distributor, upon making the election under paragraph (a)(1) of this section, promptly notifies the manufacturer of such election; such notification shall be in writing and shall identify the dealer or distributor and the electronic product or products for which the information is being accumulated and preserved.
( b ) Every dealer or distributor who elects to hold and preserve information required pursuant to § 1002.40 shall preserve the information for a period of 5 years from the date of the sale, award, or lease of the product, or until the dealer or distributor discontinues dealing in, or distributing the product, whichever is sooner. If the dealer or distributor discontinues dealing in, or distributing the product, such information as obtained pursuant to § 1002.40 shall be furnished at that time, or before, to the manufacturer of the product.
[38 FR 28625, Oct. 15, 1973, as amended at 42 FR 18063, Apr. 5, 1977; 53 FR 11254, Apr. 6, 1988; 75 FR 16352, Apr. 1, 2010]
Exhibit
      32.1 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Calgon Carbon Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John S.
      Stanik, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that **** to
      the
      best of my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods
      presented therein.




/s/
                  John S. StanikChief
                    Executive Officer
                  August
                    9, 2007




This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
§ 111.140 Under this subpart F, what records must you make and keep? ( a ) You must make and keep the records required under this subpart F in accordance with subpart P of this part.
( b ) You must make and keep the following records: ( 1 ) Written procedures for the responsibilities of the quality control operations, including written procedures for conducting a material review and making a disposition decision and written procedures for approving or rejecting any reprocessing;
( 2 ) Written documentation, at the time of performance, that quality control personnel performed the review, approval, or rejection requirements by recording the following: ( i ) Date that the review, approval, or rejection was performed; and
( ii ) Signature of the person performing the review, approval, or rejection; and
( 3 ) Documentation of any material review and disposition decision and followup. Such documentation must be included in the appropriate batch production record and must include: ( i ) Identification of the specific deviation or the unanticipated occurrence;
( ii ) Description of your investigation into the cause of the deviation from the specification or the unanticipated occurrence;
( iii ) Evaluation of whether or not the deviation or unanticipated occurrence has resulted in or could lead to a failure to ensure the quality of the dietary supplement or a failure to package and label the dietary supplement as specified in the master manufacturing record;
( iv ) Identification of the action(s) taken to correct, and prevent a recurrence of, the deviation or the unanticipated occurrence;
( v ) Explanation of what you did with the component, dietary supplement, packaging, or label;
( vi ) A scientifically valid reason for any reprocessing of a dietary supplement that is rejected or any treatment or in-process adjustment of a component that is rejected; and
( vii ) The signature of the individual(s) designated to perform the quality control operation, who conducted the material review and made the disposition decision, and of each qualified individual who provides information relevant to that material review and disposition decision.
EXHIBIT  99.1

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                    As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                          Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly Report of Semele Group, Inc. ("Semele"), on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, the
Principal  Executive  Officer  of  the  Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  1350  as  adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002  that:

(1)     the Report of Semele filed today fully complies with the requirements of
Section  13(a)  or  15  (d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and
(2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of  Semele.

                    /s/  Gary  D.  Engle
                    --------------------
                    Gary  D.  Engle
                    Chief  Executive  Officer
                    November  26,  2002
IV 

House Calendar No. 200 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 885 

[Report No. 109–517] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5638) to amend the Internal 

Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the unified credit against the estate 

tax to an exclusion equivalent of $5,000,000 and to repeal the sunset 

provision for the estate and generation-skipping taxes, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 21, 2006 

Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered 

to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5638) to amend 

the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the unified credit against the estate tax to an exclusion equivalent of $5,000,000 and to repeal the sunset provision 

for the estate and generation-skipping taxes, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution 

2 it shall be in order without intervention of any point of 

3 order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 5638) to 


wwhite on PROD1PC61 with BILLS
2 

HRES 885 RH 

1 amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the 

2 unified credit against the estate tax to an exclusion equiv3 alent of $5,000,000 and to repeal the sunset provision for 

4 the estate and generation-skipping taxes, and for other 

5 purposes. The bill shall be considered as read. The amend6 ment printed in the report of the Committee on Rules ac7 companying this resolution shall be considered as adopted. 

8 The previous question shall be considered as ordered on 

9 the bill, as amended, to final passage without intervening 

10 motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and 

11 controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member 

12 of the Committee on Ways and Means; and (2) one motion 

13 to recommit with or without instructions. 


wwhite on PROD1PC61 with BILLS

wwhite on PROD1PC61 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 200 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 885 

[Report No. 109

–517] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5638) 

poses. generation-skipping taxes, and for other purrepeal the sunset provision for the estate and to an exclusion equivalent of $5,000,000 and to increase the unified credit against the estate tax to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to 

JUNE 21, 2006 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


wwhite on PROD1PC61 with BILLS
H. Res. 7 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 3, 2017. 

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are 

hereby, elected to the following standing committees of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS: Mrs. Lowey. 

COMMITTEE ON THE BUDGET: Mr. Yarmuth. 

COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION AND THE WORKFORCE: Mr. 

Scott of Virginia. 

COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE: Mr. Pallone. 

COMMITTEE ON FINANCIAL SERVICES: Ms. Waters. 

COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS: Mr. Engel. 

COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY: Mr. Thompson 

of Mississippi. 

COMMITTEE ON HOUSE ADMINISTRATION: Mr. Brady of 

Pennsylvania. 

COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES: Mr. Grijalva. 

COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM: Mr. Cummings. 
2 

•HRES 7 EH 

COMMITTEE ON RULES: Ms. Slaughter, Mr. McGovern, 

Mr. Hastings, and Mr. Polis. 

COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS: Ms. Vela ́zquez. 

COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS: Mr. Neal. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
###### Editorial Note on Part 13

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 13 appear at 88 FR 45065, July 14, 2023.

#### § 13.50 Record for administrative decision.

The administrative record of the hearing specified in § 13.40(a) constitutes the exclusive record for decision.
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 14 - 00154 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF A .A.E., A CHILD On Appeal from the County Court at Law No . 2

Potter County, Texas Trial Court No. 847782, Honorable Pamela Cook Sirmon, Presiding



### April 28 , 2014 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. Appellant, Jessica, attempts to appeal the order signed on April 15, 2014, by an associate judge in a family law matter involving conservatorship of and chil d support for her son, A.A.E. 1 Concluding that we do not have jurisdiction over this matter, we will dismiss the cause for want of jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction to consider an appeal from a “final order ” rendered under Title 5 of the Texas Family Code. See T EX . F AM . C ODE A NN . § 109.002(b) (West 2014 );

1 To protect the pa rent ’ s and child ’ s privacy, we will refer to the mother by the alias, “Jessica,” and refer to the child by his initials. See T EX . F AM . C ODE A NN . § 109.002(d) (West 20 14 ); T EX . R. A PP . P . 9.8(b).2

Graham v. Graham , 414 S.W.3d 800, 801 (Tex. App. — Houston [1st Dist.] 2013, no pet.) ; see also Lehmann v. Har - Con Corp. , 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001) ( observing that “ the general rule, with a few mostly statutory exceptions, is that an appeal may be taken only from a final judgment ”) . An order of an associate judge presiding over a Title IV - D case may become an order of the referring court by operation o f law without need for ratification by the referring court. See T EX . F AM . C ODE A NN . § 201.1041(a) (West 2014 ). However, the order automatically becomes final only if a request for a de novo hearing is not filed in the referring court within three days of the associate judge’s ruling. See id. §§ 201.015(a) (West 2014 ), 201.1041(a); In re the Office of the Att’y Gen. of Tex. , 215 S.W.3d 913, 916 (Tex. App. — Fort Worth 2007, orig. proceeding). Here, it has come to the attention to the Clerk of this Court tha t a request for a de novo hearing has been timely filed in the County Court at Law No. 2 of Potter County under trial court cause number 847782 , and that case is currently on that court’s active docket. That being so, the associate judge’s order signed Ap ril 15, 2014, is not a final order from which an appeal may be taken to this Court. We lack jurisdiction to consider the appeal of an associate judge’s order that is not final. See Graham , 414 S.W.3d at 802. Accordingly, we dismiss this case for want of jurisdiction. T EX . R. A PP . P . 43.2(f). Mackey K. Hancock Justice
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                            2622
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    17475
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                       5891
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 31561
<PP&E>                                          159171
<DEPRECIATION>                                   19034
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  175239
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           866658
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    2000000
<COMMON>                                         23248
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  (691419)
<SALES>                                          28190
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   268453
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (150256)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    150256
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 1.404 Who serves as the presiding officer for an appeal and for an informal hearing?

The presiding officer for an appeal, and for an informal hearing, must be an Office of Regulatory Affairs Program Director or another FDA official senior to an FDA Division Director.

[85 FR 16550, Mar. 24, 2020]
§ 1314.155 Suspension pending final order. ( a ) The Administrator may suspend the right to sell scheduled listed chemical products simultaneously with, or at any time subsequent to, the service upon the seller or distributor required to file reports under § 1310.03(c) of this chapter of an order to show cause why the regulated seller or distributor should not be prohibited from selling scheduled listed chemical products, in any case where he finds that there is an imminent danger to the public health or safety. If the Administrator so suspends, he shall serve with the order to show cause under § 1314.150 an order of immediate suspension that shall contain a statement of his findings regarding the danger to public health or safety.
( b ) Upon service of the order of immediate suspension, the regulated seller or distributor shall, as instructed by the Administrator: ( 1 ) Deliver to the nearest office of the Administration or to authorized agents of the Administration all of the scheduled listed chemical products in his or her possession; or
( 2 ) Place all of the scheduled listed chemical products under seal as described in Section 304 of the Act (21 U.S.C. 824(f)).
( c ) Any suspension shall continue in effect until the conclusion of all proceedings upon the prohibition, including any judicial review, unless sooner withdrawn by the Administrator or dissolved by a court of competent jurisdiction. Any regulated seller or distributor whose right to sell scheduled listed chemical products is suspended under this section may request a hearing on the suspension at a time earlier than specified in the order to show cause under § 1314.150, which request shall be granted by the Administrator, who shall fix a date for such hearing as early as reasonably possible.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                         8905860
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          300000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                              20755000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                        24606147
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                          24562520
<LOANS>                                      103030388
<ALLOWANCE>                                    1844976
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               161582210
<DEPOSITS>                                   144170263
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            1442464
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         15275
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                    15954208
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               161582210
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                8559973
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              1464875
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                              10024848
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             3477916
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3477916
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          6546932
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   450000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                3109278
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                3635125
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     3635125
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2353125
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.68
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    9.13
<LOANS-NON>                                     170654
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               1454057
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    65795
<RECOVERIES>                                      6714
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              1844976
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               236
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        1844740
        

</TABLE>
From: Kurtis Blohm To: kevinmcdonough@unitedconveyorsupply.com CC: Bartram, Deborah; Hall.Josh@ep amail.epa.gov; Holman, Sarah; Jordan.Ronald@epamail.epa.gov

Date: 1/6/2010 9:45 AM Subject: Notes from EPA Conference Call with UCC Attachments: Follow Up to Conference Call with EPA; Notes from EPA Call with UCC
Dec_10_09.doc

Kevin,

Attached, please find the notes from EPA's conference call with UCC on December 10. We would appreciate if you and/or Dan would review these notes a nd provide us with any comments or edits you may have. Your input will help ensure the accuracy of the not es. We would like to point out one highlighted question in particular (on page 2 of the notes) that requires UCC's attention. We plan to place the notes document in the public docket supporting the Steam Electric rulemaking, so please indi cate if you consider any of the information confidential.

Additionally, I would like to follow up on the email I sent you on December 18, which I have

attached to this email. Please let us know what feedback you have on the Steam Electric questionnaire, if there is other information you can share to help EPA’s costing effort, and the status of the power plant list noted in the attached email.

We look forward to continuing our communications with UCC in 2010.

Regards,

Kurt

Kurt Blohm Eastern Research Group, Inc. 14555 Avion Pkwy, Suite 200 Chantilly, VA 20151 (703) 633-1675