alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 4.1

Number                                                                   Shares
*    *                                                                   *    *




                            SMOKY MARKET FOODS, INC.
                Organized Under the Laws of the State of Nevada

This Certifies that -- _______________________________________________-- is the
registered holder of ____________________________________________________ Shares
                  of Smoky Market Foods, Inc. Common Stock, $.001 Par Value

Transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person
or by Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.

In Witness Wereof, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed
by its duly authorized officers and its Corporate Seal to be hereunto affixed.


     this _____ day                     of ________ A.D. 20__


_________________________________            ___________________________________
President                                    Secretary


<PAGE>


For Value Received, _______ hereby sell, assign and transfer unto
_________________________________________ Shares represented by the within
Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint
___________________________ Attorney to transfer the said Shares on the books of
the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.

Dated ________________ A.D. 20__

In the presence of
___________________________
Editorial Note on Part 12
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 12 appear at 88 FR 45064, July 14, 2023.

§ 12.140 Review by the courts. ( a ) The Commissioner's final decision constitutes final agency action from which a participant may petition for judicial review under the statutes governing the matter involved. Before requesting an order from a court for a stay of action pending review, a participant shall first submit a petition for a stay of action under § 10.35.
( b ) Under 28 U.S.C. 2112(a), FDA will request consolidation of all petitions related to a particular matter.
§ 417.505 Who uses SAM Exclusions? ( a ) Federal agency officials use SAM Exclusions to determine whether to enter into a transaction with a person, as required under § 180.430 of this title.
( b ) Participants also may, but are not required to, use SAM Exclusions to determine if— ( 1 ) Principals of their transactions are excluded or disqualified, as required under § 180.320 of this title; or
( 2 ) Persons with whom they are entering into covered transactions at the next lower tier are excluded or disqualified.
( c ) SAM Exclusions are available to the general public.
CS263974-A

Zika and Sex: Information for Pregnant Women 

Living in Areas with Zika

What we know

 Zika virus can be spread by a man with Zika to his sex partners.

 In known cases of sexual transmission, the men had Zika 

symptoms. From these cases, we know the virus can be spread 

when the man has symptoms, before symptoms start and after 

symptoms end. 

 The virus stays in semen longer than in blood.

What we don’t know

 How long Zika virus can stay in the semen of infected men or spread 

though sex. 

 If men infected with Zika who never develop symptoms can have Zika 

virus in their semen or spread Zika through sex. 

 If a woman can spread Zika virus to her sex partners.

What you should know about Zika and sex

Because Zika can cause certain birth defects, 

take steps to prevent infection during your pregnancy.

If you have vaginal, anal, or oral sex 

(mouth-to-penis), use a condom from 

start to finish, every time you have 

sex during the pregnancy.

OR

Don’t have sex 

during your 

pregnancy.

If you think your male partner may have or had 

Zika, tell your doctor or healthcare provider

 If he has taken steps to prevent mosquito bites.

 If you had sex without a condom.

www.cdc.gov/zika

CDC’s Response to Zika

April 28, 2016
Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION

I, Kelly Tucek, Assistant Vice President, certify that:

- I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Inland Monthly Income Fund, L.P.;  
- Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  
- Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.  
- The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and we have:

> - designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
- evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
- disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

- The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

> - all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
- any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

By: Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation

    General Partner

/S/ Kelly Tucek____________________________________

Name: Kelly TucekTitle: Assistant Vice President of the General Partner and        Principal Financial Officer of Inland Monthly Income Fund, L.P.
Date: August 11, 2003
#### § 1100.200 Purpose and scope.

This subpart sets out requirements under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act for the maintenance of records by tobacco product manufacturers that introduce a Pre-Existing Tobacco Product, or deliver it for introduction, into interstate commerce.
#### UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Efraim CARRASQUILLO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dale THOMAS, Warden of the Metropolitan Correctional Center, New York City, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 973, Docket 81-2442.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued March 31, 1982.

Decided April 14, 1982.

Alan Scribner, New York City (Ivan S. Fisher, David Ely, Michael Davies, New York City, of counsel), for petitioner-appellant.

William J. Brennan, Asst. U. S. Atty. for the Southern District of New York, New York City (John S. Martin, Jr., U. S. Atty. for the Southern District of New York, Richard N. Papper, Asst. U. S. Atty., New York City, of counsel), for respondent-appellee.

Before FEINBERG, Chief Judge, MANSFIELD, Circuit Judge, and MISHLER, District Judge.*

*

 Honorable Jacob Mishler, Senior United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

Petitioner, Efraim Carrasquillo, appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court of the Southern District of New York, Edward Weinfeld, J., which granted the government’s motion to dismiss Carrasquillo’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The sole issue before us on appeal is whether criminal charges contained in an indictment dismissed with prejudice can form the basis for a subsequent revocation of parole. We find that the double jeopardy clause of the fifth amendment does not bar use of the charges in a parole revocation proceeding. Although the issue has not been squarely presented in this circuit, our decision here was presaged by *Billiteri v. United States Board of Parole,*541 F.2d 938, 944 (2d Cir. 1976). Judge Weinfeld addressed the issue thoroughly and we affirm on the basis of his opinion, reported at 527 F.Supp. 1105.

Judgment affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS IN FORM 10-Q FOR MEDIALINK WORLDWIDE INCORPORATED FOR THE
PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,647,645
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               16,268,138
<ALLOWANCES>                                   447,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,619,651
<PP&E>                                       7,866,705
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,242,771
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              39,418,739
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,920,489
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        57,012
<OTHER-SE>                                  31,251,703
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                39,418,739
<SALES>                                     28,563,692
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            28,563,692
<CGS>                                       10,605,185
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,605,185
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            15,807,641
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,876
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,210,284
<INCOME-TAX>                                   932,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            932,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,278,284
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21



</TABLE>
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2014-0848 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2014-CE-031-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Be th Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 29, 2015

t0422 

# Order

Clerk April 29, 2015

150051

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL

RESOURCES AN D ENVIRONMENT,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 150051

COA: 314336

Ingham CC: 11

- 000156

- CE

STREFLING OIL COMPANY, STREFLING

REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS #1, LLC

and RONALD G. STREFLING,

Defendants

- Appellants.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 29, 2014

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                           9,127
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,332
<ALLOWANCES>                                       264
<INVENTORY>                                      1,651
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,846
<PP&E>                                           6,229
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,675
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  26,203
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,614
<BONDS>                                          7,000
<COMMON>                                             5
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,589
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    26,203
<SALES>                                          2,543
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,726
<CGS>                                            2,017
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,135
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    64
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (490)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (490)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (490)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
H. Res. 616 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

November 14, 2017. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 2874) to 

achieve reforms to improve the financial stability of the National Flood Insurance Program, to enhance the development 

of more accurate estimates of flood risk through new technology and better maps, to increase the role of private markets in the management of flood insurance risks, and to provide for alternative methods to insure against flood peril, and 

for other purposes. All points of order against consideration 

of the bill are waived. In lieu of the amendment in the nature 

of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Financial 

Services now printed in the bill, the amendment printed in 

part A of the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, modified by the amendment printed 

in part B of that report, shall be considered as adopted. The 

bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. All points of 

order against provisions in the bill, as amended, are waived. 

The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
2 

•HRES 616 EH 

bill, as amended, and on any further amendment thereto, to 

final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour 

of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and 

ranking minority member of the Committee on Financial 

Services; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

SEC. 2. Upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 

order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill 

(H.R. 2810) to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2018 

for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for 

such fiscal year, and for other purposes. All points of order 

against the conference report and against its consideration 

are waived. The conference report shall be considered as read. 

The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 

conference report to its adoption without intervening motion 

except: (1) one hour of debate; and (2) one motion to recommit if applicable. 

SEC. 3. The Clerk shall not transmit to the Senate a 

message that the House has adopted the conference report to 

accompany H.R. 2810 until notified by the Speaker or by 
3 

•HRES 616 EH 

message from the Senate that the Senate has passed H.R. 

4374 without amendment. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
#### CAILLE *v.*SAGINAW CIRCUIT JUDGE. STEELE *v.*SAME.

Garnishment — Default Judgments — Setting Aside — Rules — Motions for New Trial — Framing Issues.

These cases are ruled by *Caille Brothers Co.*v. *Saginaw Circuit Judge,*ante, 480, involving the same facts.

Mandamus by Adolph Á. Caille and Wilbur W. Steele and A. Arthur Caille to compel Chauncey H. Gage, circuit judge of Saginaw county, to file findings of facts and of law.

Submitted November 17, 1908.

(Calendar Nos. 23,118, 23,119.)

Reargued December 29, 1908.

Writs denied March 3, 1909.

*Jonathan Palmer, Jr.,*and *Elbridge E. Bacon (George W. Weadock*and *Bussell B. Thayer,*of counsel), for relators.

*John A. McKay {Gray & Gray,*of counsel), for respondent.

Grant, J.

The motions in the above cases are the same as that in *Caille Brothers Co.*v. *Saginaw Circuit Judge,*ante, 480, and the same order will be entered, with costs.

Blair, C. J., and Montgomery, Ostrander, and Hooker, JJ., concurred.
#### § 182.125 Does this part affect the Federal contracts that I receive?

This part will affect future contract awards indirectly if you are debarred or suspended for a violation of the requirements of this part, as described in § 182.510(c). However, this part does not apply directly to procurement contracts. The portion of the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 that applies to Federal procurement contracts is carried out through the Federal Acquisition Regulation in chapter 1 of Title 48 of the Code of Federal Regulations (the drug-free workplace coverage currently is in 48 CFR part 23, subpart 23.5).
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 34 (Monday, February 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7650-7651]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3308]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

February 16, 2010.
    The Department of Treasury will submit the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13, on or 
after the publication date of this notice. Copies of the submission(s) 
may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau Clearance Officer 
listed. Comments regarding this information collection should be 
addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the Treasury Department 
Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 11000, 1750 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before March 24, 2010 
to be assured of consideration.

Bureau of Public Debt (BPD)

    OMB Number: 1535-0114.
    Type of Review: Reinstatement without change of a previously 
approved collection.
    Title: Release.
    Form: PDF-2001.
    Description: Used by the owner, co-owner, or other person entitled 
to ratify payment of savings bonds/notes and release the United States 
of America from any liability.
    Respondents: Individuals or Households.
    Estimated Total Burden Hours: 20 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Bruce Sharpe, (304) 480-8150. Bureau of the 
Public Debt, 200 Third Street, Parkersburg, West Virginia 26106.
    OMB Reviewer: Shagufta Ahmed, (202) 395-7873. Office of Management 
and Budget, Room 10235, New

[[Page 7651]]

Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.

Celina Elphage,
Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-3308 Filed 2-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-39-P
§ 1005.20 Hearing. ( a ) If, from an examination of the sample or otherwise, it appears that the product may be subject to a refusal of admission, the Secretary shall give the owner or consignee a written notice to that effect, stating the reasons therefor. The notice shall specify a place and a period of time during which the owner or consignee shall have an opportunity to introduce testimony unless the owner or consignee indicates his intention to bring the product into compliance. Upon timely request, such time and place may be changed. Such testimony shall be confined to matters relevant to the admissibility of the article and may be introduced orally or in writing.
( b ) If the owner or consignee submits or indicates his intention to submit an application for permission to perform such action as is necessary to bring the product into compliance with the Act, such application shall include the information required by § 1005.21.
( c ) If the application is not submitted at or prior to the hearing, the Secretary may allow a reasonable time for filing such application.