alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2018082DE.01001802.xml

| 26.3.2018 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 82/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.3.2018

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 82/18

---

Berichtigung der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) 2018/33 der Kommission vom 28. September 2017 zur Festlegung technischer Durchführungsstandards für das standardisierte Format für die Präsentation der Entgeltaufstellung und des betreffenden gemeinsamen Symbols gemäß der Richtlinie 2014/92/EU des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 6 vom 11. Januar 2018
  )

Seite 29, Artikel 10 Absatz 5 Satz 2:

Anstatt:

„Der Zahlungsdienstleister gibt in der entsprechenden Unterspalte ‚Es wurde keine Gebühr in Rechnung gestellt‘ an, wenn“

muss es heißen:

„Der Zahlungsdienstleister gibt in der entsprechenden Unterspalte ‚Es wurde kein Entgelt in Rechnung gestellt‘ an, wenn“.

---
[Cite as McLeod v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 2011-Ohio-1851.]

Court of Claims of Ohio

The Ohio Judicial Center 

65 South Front Street, Third Floor 

Columbus, OH 43215 

614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263 

www.cco.state.oh.us

ALBERT MCLEOD, III 

 Plaintiff 

 v. 

OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION 

 Defendant 

Case No. 2009-04220 

Judge Joseph T. Clark 

Magistrate Matthew C. Rambo 

JUDGMENT ENTRY

{¶ 1} On January 31, 2011, the magistrate issued a decision recommending 

judgment for plaintiff. 

{¶ 2} Civ.R. 53(D)(3)(b)(i) states, in part: “A party may file written objections to 

a magistrate’s decision within fourteen days of the filing of the decision, whether or not 

the court has adopted the decision during that fourteen-day period as permitted by 

Civ.R. 53(D)(4)(e)(i).” No objections were filed. 

{¶ 3} The court determines that there is no error of law or other defect evident 

on the face of the magistrate’s decision. Therefore, the court adopts the magistrate’s 

decision and recommendation as its own, including findings of fact and conclusions of 

law contained therein. Judgment is rendered for plaintiff. The case is ready to be set 

for trial on the issue of damages. 

 _____________________________________ 

 JOSEPH T. CLARK 

 Judge 

cc: 
Case No. 2009-04220 - 2 - ENTRY

 

Christopher P. Conomy 

Assistant Attorney General 

150 East Gay Street, 18th Floor 

Columbus, Ohio 43215-3130 

Richard F. Swope 

6480 East Main Street, Suite 102 

Reynoldsburg, Ohio 43068 

MR/cmd/Filed March 23, 2011/To S.C. reporter April 12, 2011
38493.

#### DUNN v. THE STATE.

Carlisle, Judge.

William Dunn was tried in the City Court of Macon on an accusation drawn under the provisions of the act approved December 18, 1953 (Ga. L. 1953, Nov.-Dee. Sess., p. 321) charging him with contributing to the delinquency of the named minor child. The evidence showed overwhelmingly that the defendant had, on several different occasions, picked up girls, inmates of the Georgia Training School for Girls (colored division), on the road near the school including among them the particular minor named in the accusation, and that he carried these girls to various places in Bibb County, and adjoining counties, for the purpose of having sexual relations with them. The testimony of the *474particular girl named in the accusation was substantiated by the testimony of at least three other girls and by other witnesses at the motel and other places where the defendant was seen with the girls, or in the act of picking them up. The evidence amply authorized the verdict of guilty and the trial court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial on the general grounds.

Decided September 13, 1960

Rehearing denied September 28, 1960.

William Dunn, *pro se.*

*Clarence H. Clay, Jr., Solicitor, Harry F. Thompson, Assistant Solicitor,*contra.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Townsend and Frankum, JJ., concur. Gardner, P. J., not participating.*
§ 910.508 Auditee responsibilities. The auditee must: ( a ) Procure or otherwise arrange for the audit required by this Part in accordance with § 910.509 Auditor selection, and ensure it is properly performed and submitted when due in accordance with § 910.512 Report submission.
( b ) Submit appropriate financial statements (if available).
( c ) Submit the schedule of expenditures of DOE awards in accordance with § 910.510 Financial statements.
( d ) Promptly follow up and take corrective action on audit findings, including preparation of a summary schedule of prior audit findings and a corrective action plan in accordance with § 910.511 Audit findings follow- up, paragraph (b) and § 910.511 Audit findings follow-up, paragraph (c), respectively.
( e ) Provide the auditor with access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation, and other information as needed for the auditor to perform the audit required by this Part.
MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

2007-2158.

#### State ex rel. Oko v. McDonnell.

Cuyahoga App. No. 90119, 2007-0hio-5331. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County. It appears from the records of this court that appellant has not filed a merit brief, due January 15, 2008, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by the court that this cause is dismissed sua sponte.
**EXHIBIT
      31.1**





**CERTIFICATIONS**








I,
      Emil
      H. Soika, certify that:





1. I
      have
      reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Criticare Systems,
      Inc.;





2. Based
      on
      my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based
      on
      my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
      in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
      results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
      periods presented in this report;





4. The
      registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
      and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules
      13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





(a) designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
      and
      procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
      information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
      is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
      period in which this report is being prepared;





(b) evaluated
      the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and
      presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
      this
      report based on such evaluation; and





(c) disclosed
      in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that
      has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
      registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The
      registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
      registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
      (or persons performing the equivalent functions):











(a) all
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and





(b) any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting.





Date:
      November 13, 2006




/s/
      Emil H.
      Soika


Emil
      H.
      Soika


President
      and Chief Executive Officer





2
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

January 16, 2020

No. 04

- 19

- 00691

- CV

CUANTO ANTES MEJOR, LLC and M.E. Phillip

,

Appellant

v.

EOG RESOURCES, INC.

, Appellee

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Karnes County, Texas

Trial Court No. 15

- 12

- 00277

- CVK Honorable Lynn Ellison, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellee’s partially opposed first motion for an extension of time to file the appellee’s brief is granted. We order appellee to file the appellee’s brief by February 19, 2020.

___________________________ ______ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 16th day of January, 2020

.

_____________________ ______________ M ichael A. C ruz , Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 616 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 616

   Directing the Committee on Government Reform to hold hearings on 
    intelligence relating to the rationale for the commencement of 
                        Operation Iraqi Freedom.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 15, 2005

  Mr. Lynch (for himself, Mr. Waxman, Mr. Lantos, Mr. Kanjorski, Mrs. 
   Maloney, Mr. Cummings, Ms. Norton, Mr. Higgins, and Ms. Linda T. 
 Sanchez of California) submitted the following resolution; which was 
                   referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Directing the Committee on Government Reform to hold hearings on 
    intelligence relating to the rationale for the commencement of 
                        Operation Iraqi Freedom.

    Resolved, That the Committee on Government Reform shall, not later 
than 30 days after the date of the adoption of this resolution, hold at 
least one hearing, and as many additional hearings as considered 
necessary by the chairman of the committee, in consultation with the 
ranking minority member of the committee, on intelligence (as such term 
is defined in section 3(1) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 
U.S.C. 401a(1))) relating to the rationale for the commencement of 
Operation Iraqi Freedom that was available before the operation began 
on March 19, 2003.
                                 <all>
```
EX‐34.3

 

(logo) pwc

  

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

To the Board of Directors, PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.:

 

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association (“Midland” or the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for all transactions serviced on the *Enterprise!*LoanManagement System (the “Platform”), as of December31, 2015 and for the year then ended, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i)(B), 1122(d)(3)(i)(C), 1122(d)(3)(i)(D), 1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Companyhas determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform.Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management's assertion that Midland complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

February 25, 2016

 

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 1100 Walnut Street, Suite 1300, Kansas City, MO 64106 

*T: (816) 472 7921, F: (816) 218 1890 www.pwc.com/us*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          69,782
<SECURITIES>                                       400
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,481
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                94,663
<PP&E>                                       3,011,349
<DEPRECIATION>                                 765,672
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,340,340
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,841
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,196,546
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,340,340
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               138,923
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   76,881
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 62,042
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             62,042
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    62,042
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.37
        

</TABLE>
# m8799.docx

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 19.3.2018 C(2018) 1760 final To t he notifying part ies Subject : Case M. 8799 - MARUBENI ITOCHU STEEL / SUMITOMO CORPORATION / JV Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 1 and Article 57 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area 2 Dear Sir or Madam, 1. On 20 February 2018 , the European Commission received notification of a proposed conc entration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which the undertaking s Marubeni-Ito chu Steel Inc. (‘MISI’, Japan) and Sumitomo Corporation (‘Sumitomo’, Japan) , acquire within the meaning of Article s 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the whole of the undertaking Hiroshima Steel Center Co. Ltd (‘Hiroshima Steel’, Japan), currently controlled by MISI , by way of purchase of shares . 3 2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are: - for MISI: import, export, manufacture, processing and sale of iron and steel products, - for Sumitomo: trading and investments in various sectors of the economy, such as metal products, - for Hiroshima Steel: processing and sales of steel products. 3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5(a ) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 . 4 4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation and Article 57 of the EEA Agreement . For the Commission
(S igned)
Johannes LAITENBERGER Director - General
(1)
OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ( the ' Merger Regulation ' ). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( ' TFEU ' ) has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of ' Community ' by ' Union ' and ' common market ' by ' internal market ' . The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.
(2) OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3 ( the ' EEA Agreement ' ).
(3) Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 082 , 05 . 03 . 2018 , p. 6 .
(4)
OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5 .
§ 1301.77 Security controls for freight forwarding facilities. ( a ) All Schedule II-V controlled substances that will be temporarily stored at the freight forwarding facility must be either: ( 1 ) stored in a segregated area under constant observation by designated responsible individual(s); or
( 2 ) stored in a secured area that meets the requirements of Section 1301.72(b) of this Part. For purposes of this requirement, a facility that may be locked down (*i.e.,* secured against physical entry in a manner consistent with requirements of Section 1301.72(b)(3)(ii) of this part) and has a monitored alarm system or is subject to continuous monitoring by security personnel will be deemed to meet the requirements of Section 1301.72(b)(3) of this Part.
( b ) Access to controlled substances must be kept to an absolute minimum number of specifically authorized individuals. Non-authorized individuals may not be present in or pass through controlled substances storage areas without adequate observation provided by an individual authorized in writing by the registrant.
( c ) Controlled substances being transferred through a freight forwarding facility must be packed in sealed, unmarked shipping containers.
[65 FR 44678, July 19, 2000; 65 FR 45829, July 25, 2000]
§ 1250.35 Health of persons handling food. ( a ) Any person who is known or suspected to be in a communicable period or a carrier of any communicable disease shall not be permitted to engage in the preparation, handling, or serving of water, other beverages, or food.
( b ) Any person known or suspected to be suffering from gastrointestinal disturbance or who has on the exposed portion of the body an open lesion or an infected wound shall not be permitted to engage in the preparation, handling, or serving of food or beverages.
§ 1250.70 Employee conveniences. ( a ) There shall be adequate toilet, washroom, locker, and other essential sanitary facilities readily accessible for use of employees adjacent to places or areas where land and air conveyances are serviced, maintained, and cleaned. These facilities shall be maintained in a clean and sanitary condition at all times.
( b ) In the case of diners not in a train but with a crew on board, adequate toilet facilities shall be available to the crew within a reasonable distance but not exceeding 500 feet of such diners.
( c ) Drinking fountains and coolers shall be constructed of impervious, nonoxidizing material, and shall be so designed and constructed as to be easily cleaned. The jet of a drinking fountain shall be slanting and the orifice of the jet shall be protected by a guard in such a manner as to prevent contamination thereof by droppings from the mouth. The orifice of such a jet shall be located a sufficient distance above the rim of the basin to prevent backflow.
MEDIALINK WORLDWIDE INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, J. Graeme McWhirter, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Medialink Worldwide
Incorporated;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      a)    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
            disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
            supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
            registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
            to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
            period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

      b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
            and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our
            conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
            procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly
            report based on such evaluation; and

      c)    Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant's
            internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
            registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
            affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
            registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      a)    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
            or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
            reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
            record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

      b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
            other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
            internal control over financial reporting.

Dated: November 15, 2004

/s/ J. Graeme McWhirter
-------------------------
Name: J. Graeme McWhirter
Title: Executive Vice President