alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 180

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 180 appear at 79 FR 75879, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 180.605 How does suspension differ from debarment?

Suspension differs from debarment in that—

| A suspending official . . . | A debarring official . . . |
| --- | --- |
| (a) Imposes suspension as a temporary status of in eligibility for procurement and nonprocurement transactions, pending completion of an investigation or legal proceedings | Imposes debarment for a specified period as a final determination that a person is not presently responsible. |
| (b) Must— | |
| (1) Have *adequate evidence* that there may be a cause for debarment of a person; and | |
| (2) Conclude that *immediate action* is necessary to protect the Federal interest | Must conclude, based on a *preponderance of the evidence,* that the person has engaged in conduct that warrants debarment. |
| (c) Usually imposes the suspension *first,* and then promptly notifies the suspended person, giving the person an opportunity to contest the suspension and have it lifted | Imposes debarment *after* giving the respondent notice of the action and an opportunity to contest the proposed debarment. |
Editorial Note on Part 112
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 112 appear at 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 112.134 What must I do to control animal excreta and litter from domesticated animals that are under my control? ( a ) If you have domesticated animals, to prevent contamination of covered produce, food contact surfaces, areas used for a covered activity, agricultural water sources, or agricultural water distribution systems with animal waste, you must: ( 1 ) Adequately control their excreta and litter; and
( 2 ) Maintain a system for control of animal excreta and litter.
( b ) [Reserved]
### Open-File Report 98-594Version 1.0

# The Purisima Formation and Related Rocks (Upper Miocene - Pliocene),Greater San Francisco Bay Area, Central California: Review of literature and USGS collection (now housed at the Museum of Paleontology, University of California, Berkeley)

#### By: Charles L. Powell, II

1. View the revision list as an unformatted, text-only file: of98-594revs_1a.txt (1 KB)

#### 2. The Report



- View the report as a formatted PDF file:of98-594_2a.pdf (312 KB)

#### 3. Oversize Sheets

- Download Table 12 - Published Purisima Formation faunal list, as a PDF (72 kB) of98-594_3a.pdf
- Download Table 12 - Published Purisima Formation faunal list, in Postscript format (240 kB) of98-594_3a.ps
- Download Table 13 - USGS Purisima Formation collections, as a PDF (72 kB) of98-594_3b.pdf
- Download Table 13 - USGS Purisima Formation collections, in Postscript format (380 kB) of98-594_3b.ps

---

The URL for this page is:  https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/1998/of98-594/Maintained by:Michael DigglesPlease send comments about the contents of the report to: Charles L. Powell, IIUpdated: May 29, 2007 (mfd)
#### § 376.147 Does an exclusion from participation in Federal health care programs under Title XI of the Social Security Act affect a person's eligibility to participate in nonprocurement and procurement transactions?

Any individual or entity excluded from participation in Medicare, Medicaid, and other Federal health care programs under Title XI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 1320a-7, 1320a-7a, 1320c-5, or 1395ccc, and implementing regulation at 42 CFR part 1001, will be subject to the prohibitions against participating in covered transactions, as set forth in this part and part 180, and is prohibited from participating in all Federal Government procurement programs and nonprocurement programs. For example, if an individual or entity is excluded by the HHS Office of the Inspector General from participation in Medicare, Medicaid, and/or other Federal health care programs, in accordance with 42 U.S.C. 1320a-7, then that individual or entity is prohibited from participating in all Federal Government procurement and nonprocurement programs (42 CFR part 1001).
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 29, 2015

t0422

Order 

Clerk

April 29, 2015

150051

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL

RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 150051

COA: 314336

Ingham CC: 11-000156-CE

STREFLING OIL COMPANY, STREFLING

REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS #1, LLC

and RONALD G. STREFLING,

Defendants-Appellants.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 29, 2014 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 250 (Thursday, December 30, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 82409]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32792]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-5375-N-51]


Federal Property Suitable as Facilities To Assist the Homeless

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and 
surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible 
use to assist the homeless.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Juanita Perry, Department of Housing 
and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Room 7262, Washington, 
DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and 
speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-
free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 800-927-7588.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the December 12, 1988 
court order in National Coalition for the Homeless v. Veterans 
Administration, No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a 
weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus 
Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for 
suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the 
purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been 
determined suitable or unsuitable this week.

    Dated: December 23, 2010.
Mark R. Johnston,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.
[FR Doc. 2010-32792 Filed 12-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
§ 600.7 Small and disadvantaged and women-owned business participation. ( a ) DOE encourages the participation in financial assistance awards of small businesses, including those owned by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals and women, of historically black colleges, and of colleges and universities with substantial minority enrollments.
( b ) For definitions of the terms in paragraph (a) of this section, see the Higher Education Act of 1965, and 15 U.S.C. 644, as amended by the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act (FASA), and implementing regulations under FASA issued by the Office of Federal Procurement Policy.
( c ) When entering into contracts under financial assistance awards, recipients and subrecipients shall comply with the requirements of §§ 600.144, 600.236 and 600.331, as applicable.
[61 FR 7166, Feb. 26, 1996, as amended at 74 FR 44276, Aug. 28, 2009]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v ) CR. NO. 3:06cr204-MEF

)

HENRY ERIK YAPIAS )

ORDER

Now pending before the court is the defendant’s motion to allow Jennifer Hart to

withdraw as counsel of record and to appoint a CJA panel attorney (doc. # 20). On

November 21, 2006, Attorney Sydney Albert Smith filed a notice of appearance.

Accordingly, upon consideration of the motion, and for good cause, it is

ORDERED that the defendant’s motion for Jennifer Hart to withdraw and appoint a

panel attorney be and is hereby GRANTED. It is further

ORDERED that Sydney Albert Smith be and is hereby appointed to represent the

defendant for all further proceedings.

Done this 27 day of November, 2006. th

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cr-00204-MEF-CSC Document 22 Filed 11/27/2006 Page 1 of 1
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 16

- 00273

- CV

IN RE MACK BENNETT RELATOR

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

TRIAL COURT NO. 342

- 268831

- 13

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

------------

We have considered “ Relator’s Amen ded Motion to Dismiss Petition for

Writ of Mandamus as Moot .” It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be

granted; therefore, we dismiss this original proceeding.

/s/ Bonnie Sudderth

BONNIE SUDDERTH

JUSTICE

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; GABRIE L and SUDDERTH, JJ.

DELIVERED: August 1 9 , 2016

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
"Berry, Leslie" <Leslie _ Berry@americanchem istry.com> 12/29/2010 12:09 PM To EHPV-Program-Submissions@EPA cc "Franz, Christina" <Christina
_ Franz@americanchemistry.com> bcc Subject n-Pentyl Propionate EHPV Submission 

### · Type of EHPV Program Sponsorship: Standard EHPV program commitment · Sponsor Name: ACC’s Oxo Process Panel · Submission Title: n-Pentyl Propionate EHPV Submission · CAS Numbers: 624-54-4 Please contact me with any questions. Regards Leslie Leslie Berry Chemical Products & Technology Division American Chemistry Council 700 2 nd 

### Street, N E, Washington, DC 20002 Ph: (202) 249.6716 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ This message may contain confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee do not disseminate, distribute or copy this email. Please notify the sender immediately by email if you have received this email by mistake and delete this email from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as a result of email transmission. American Chemistry Council, 700 –2nd Street NE, Washington, DC 20002,

### www.americanchemistry.com - n-Pentyl
_ Propionate
_ TestPlan
_ 22Dec
_ 2010.doc - Pentyl
_ Propionate
_ Dossier
_ Dec
_ 20
_ 2010.doc
#### § 3256.200 Whom in the NEA does a recipient other than an individual notify about a criminal drug conviction?

A recipient other than an individual that is required under 2 CFR 182.225(a) to notify Federal agencies about an employee's conviction for a criminal drug offense must notify the NEA awarding official or other designee for each award that it currently has.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

RAKHMATULLA ASATOV,

Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY,

Respondent.

______________________ 

2014-3021

______________________ 

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in No. DC3330130179-I-1.

______________________ 

ON MOTION

______________________ 

O R D E R

Rakhmatulla Asatov moves for leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis. 

Upon consideration thereof,

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

The motion is granted.

Case: 14-3021 Document: 10 Page: 1 Filed: 11/25/2013
2 ASATOV v. ARMY

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Daniel E. O’Toole

 Clerk of Court

s24

Case: 14-3021 Document: 10 Page: 2 Filed: 11/25/2013
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                         538,513
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,991,302
<ALLOWANCES>                                   370,661
<INVENTORY>                                  7,295,691
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,752,564
<PP&E>                                      40,642,480
<DEPRECIATION>                              13,814,826
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              41,826,307
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,979,382
<BONDS>                                     14,134,558
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     7,873,415
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,646,952
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                41,826,307
<SALES>                                     14,950,282
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,950,282
<CGS>                                        9,200,205
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,200,205
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,761,519
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                45,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             505,607
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,464,391
<INCOME-TAX>                                   560,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            904,391
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   904,391
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .23
        


</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 25

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 25 appear at 79 FR 75879, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 25.401 Federal Awarding Agency.

*Federal Awarding Agency* has the meaning given in 2 CFR 200.1.
H. Res. 940

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 25, 2006.

Whereas Peru gained independence from Spain on July 28, 

1821, when the Republic of Peru was established as a 

sovereign and independent country; 

Whereas the people of Peru have established, after a series 

of military and authoritarian regimes, a unique, pluralistic democracy which includes the freedoms cherished by 

the people of the United States, including freedom of 

speech, freedom of religion, freedom of association, freedom of the press, and government by the consent of the 

governed; 

Whereas Peru regularly holds free and fair elections and promotes free exchange of ideas; 

Whereas the interests of Peru and the United States are 

closely aligned; 

Whereas the people of the United States share affinity with 

the people of Peru and view Peru as a strong ally; 

Whereas the United States has joined Peru to promote political and economic freedoms, combat poverty, crime, disease, and drugs, and promote security, stability, and 

prosperity within Peru; 

Whereas the bonds of association and friendship between the 

peoples of the two countries have been strengthened by 
2

•HRES 940 EH 

the large number of Peruvians who have migrated to the 

United states where they make significant contributions 

to both the United States and Peru; 

Whereas Peru is an integral member of the Latin American 

region and has been a constructive partner of the United 

States in fulfilling the agenda of the Western Hemisphere; and 

Whereas the Peruvians and Peruvian-Americans residing in 

the United States have enriched and added to the United 

States way of life in the social, economic, and political 

arenas, and Peru’s rich identity and heritage have become an integral part of the cultural tapestry of the 

United States: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) recognizes the 185th anniversary of the independence of Peru; 

(2) extends warm congratulations and best wishes 

to Peru for peace and further progress, development, 

and prosperity; and 

(3) extends best wishes to Peruvians and PeruvianAmericans residing in the United States as they celebrate the 185th anniversary of Peru’s independence. 

Attest:

Clerk.
Name(Last,First,Middle)TitleCompany/OrganizationStreetAddressPhoneEmailWebinar Attendees: Metal Halide Lamp Fixtures NOPR MeetingFaxCityState/ProvZipMeeting Date:9/27/2013N/AVentureLightingjbaird@adlt.com32000AuroraRd.N/ABaird,JeevonN/AsolonOH44139ResearchEconomistPacificNorthwestNationalLaboratory(PNNL)natasha.collins@pnl.gov620SW5thAve,Suite810503-417-7565Collins,Natasha503‐417‐2175PortlandOR97204N/ANavigantConsulting,Inc.michael.droesch@navigant.com77SBedfordStreetN/ADroesch,MichaelN/ABurlingtonMA01803N/APacificNorthwestNationalLaboratory(PNNL)douglas.elliott@pnnl.gov620SW5thAve.,Suite810N/AElliott,DougN/APortlandOR97204N/ALumenOptixderrigo@lumenoptix.com203ProgressDrN/AErrigo,DavidN/AMontgomeryvillePA18936N/AU.S.DepartmentofEnergy(DOE)jack.graul@ee.doe.gov950L'EnfantPlazaN/AGraul,JackN/AWashingtonDC20024N/AFloridaPower&Lightjoe.hancock@fpl.com12350184Court,NorthN/AHancock,JoeN/AJupiterFL33478N/AWileyReinjhodges@wileyrein.com1776KStreet,NWN/AHodges,JohnN/AWashingtonDC20006N/APacificNorthwestNationalLaboratory(PNNL)donna.hostick@pnnl.gov902BattelleBoulevardN/AHostick,DonnaN/ARichlandWA99352ProductManagerUniversalLightingTechnologieseklonowski@unvlt.com26CenturyBlvd,Suite500N/AKlonowski,EdwardN/ANashvilleTN37214SeniorEnergyEfficiencyScientistPacificNorthWestNationalLaboratory(PNNL)robert.lingard@pnnl.gov620SW5thAve,Suite810503-417-7542Lingard,Robert503‐417‐2175PortlandOR97204N/AUniversalLightingTechnologiesmlitvinovich@unvlt.com1267HamiltonParkwayN/ALitvinovich,MichaelN/AItascaIL60143Page1of208/18/201417:05:23Name(Last,First,Middle)TitleCompany/OrganizationStreetAddressPhoneEmailWebinar Attendees: Metal Halide Lamp Fixtures NOPR MeetingFaxCityState/ProvZipMeeting Date:9/27/2013N/ANavigantConsulting,Inc.sarah.martin@navigant.com120019thStreetN/AMartin,SarahN/AWashingtonDC20036N/ANavigantConsulting,Inc.astrid.mills@navigant.com120019thstreetN/AMills,AstridN/AWashingtonDC20036N/AN/Anneedham@junolightinggroup.com12001ExitFiveParkwayN/ANeedham,NatalieN/AFishersIN46038EngineeringManagerOsramSylvaniaElectronicControlSystemsjoe.parisella@sylvania.com54CherryHillDrive978-750-3958Parisella,Joe978‐646‐6848DanversMA01923N/AMuscoSportsLighting,LLCcraig.pawlak@musco.com1001stAve,West,POBox808N/APawalk,CraigN/AOskaloosaIA52577N/AFranklinEnergyServiceslschulte@franklinenergy.com12075N.CorporateParkwayN/ASchulte,LieselN/AMequonWI53092N/AEnergySolutionsavalenti@energy‐solution.com1610HarrisonStreetN/AValenti,AlexN/AOaklandCA94680EnvironmentalScientistNewYorkStateOfficeoftheAttorneyGeneralLinda.Wilson@ag.ny.gov120Broadway212-416-8948Wilson,Linda212‐416‐6007NewYorkNY10271SeniorResearchEngineer‐EnergyandEngineeringDivisionPacificNorthwestNationalLaboratory(PNNL)david.winiarski@pnl.govwiniarski@charter.net902BattelleBoulevardP.O.Box999MSINK5‐08509-375-4461Winiarski,David509‐375‐3614RichlandWA99337VicePresident,StandardsAir‐Conditioning,Heating&RefrigerationInstitute(AHRI)mwoodford@ahrinet.org2111WilsonBoulevard,Suite500703-600-0328Woodford,MichaelW.703‐528‐3816ArlingtonVA22201ContactsIncluded:22DocketId:EERE‐2009‐BT‐STD‐0018Page2of208/18/201417:05:23
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of National Medical Health Card Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”), I, Stuart Diamond, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that, to my knowledge: 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company. 

 

Stuart Diamond 

ChiefFinancial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) 

Date: May 3, 2007 

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or theExchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-20477

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

FLOYD COLEMAN,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Texas

(H-96-CV-1009)

June 17, 1998

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

F ederal prisoner Floyd Coleman petitions this court for a

certificate of appealability (COA) from the district court’s denial

of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. Coleman filed this motion on March

25, 1996, prior to the effective date of the Antiterrorism and

Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA). Accordingly, because

the AEDPA is inapplicable here, Coleman need obtain neither a COA,

see United States v. Carter

, 117 F.3d 262, 264 (5th Cir. 1997), nor2

a certificate of probable cause (CPC), see United States v. Rocha

,

109 F.3d 225, 228 (5th Cir. 1997). Coleman’s motion for a COA is

therefore DENIED as unnecessary.

On October 25, 1996, the dist rict court denied Coleman’s §

2255 motion. Coleman had 60 days to notice an appeal from this

denial. S ee Fed. R. App. P. 4(a). On March 5, 1997, Coleman moved

for an out-of-t ime appeal from this denial, citing excusable

neglect as grounds for his motion. The district court denied

Coleman an out-of-time appeal, for he failed to file his motion for

an out-of-time appeal within 30 days from the expiration of the

time allotted for an appeal, as provided by Fed . R. App. P.

4(a)(5). In short, Coleman had 90 days from October 25, 1996, to

request an out-of-time appeal. Because he is a prisoner, we treat

the date Coleman deposited his motion in the prison mail system

--

February 27, 1997 -- as the date he filed a motion for an out-oftime appeal. See Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266 (1988). Even so,

his filing on February 27 was more than 90 days from the date that

the district court initially denied him § 2255 relief. The

district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Coleman

leave t o file an appeal out-of-time. S ee Latham v. Wells Fargo

Bank, N.A. , 987 F.2d 1199, 1202 (5th Cir. 1993).

AFFIRMED.
#### § 182.670 Suspension.

Suspension means an action taken by a Federal agency that immediately prohibits a recipient from participating in Federal Government procurement contracts and covered nonprocurement transactions for a temporary period, pending completion of an investigation and any judicial or administrative proceedings that may ensue. A recipient so prohibited is suspended, in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation for procurement contracts (48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4) and agency regulations implementing the OMB guidance on nonprocurement debarment and suspension (2 CFR part 180, which implements Executive Orders 12549 and 12689). Suspension of a recipient is a distinct and separate action from suspension of an award or suspension of payments under an award.
#### § 1138.2 Applicability of this part.

The types of awards and entities to which this part and other parts in this subchapter apply are described in the subchapter overview at 2 CFR 1126.2.