alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 324 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 324

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                          May 18, 2017.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 1039) to amend section 3606 of title 18, 
United States Code, to grant probation officers authority to arrest hostile 
third parties who obstruct or impede a probation officer in the performance of 
official duties. All points of order against consideration of the bill are 
waived. The bill shall be considered as read. All points of order against 
provisions in the bill are waived. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the bill and on any amendment thereto to final passage without 
intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled 
by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary; (2) 
the amendment printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this 
resolution, if offered by the Member designated in the report, which shall be in 
order without intervention of any point of order, shall be considered as read, 
shall be separately debatable for the time specified in the report equally 
divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, and shall not be 
subject to a demand for a division of the question; and (3) one motion to 
recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### § 1301.92 Illicit activities by employees.

It is the position of DEA that employees who possess, sell, use or divert controlled substances will subject themselves not only to State or Federal prosecution for any illicit activity, but shall also immediately become the subject of independent action regarding their continued employment. The employer will assess the seriousness of the employee's violation, the position of responsibility held by the employee, past record of employment, etc., in determining whether to suspend, transfer, terminate or take other action against the employee.

[40 FR 17143, Apr. 17, 1975]
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 934 

Supporting the goals and ideals of Plan Ahead with an Advance Directive 

Week. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 20, 2006 

Mr. GINGREY submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of Plan Ahead with an 

Advance Directive Week. 

Whereas life and death situations confront hundreds of thousands of persons within the United States each year due 

to life threatening illness or injury; 

Whereas advance directives offer individuals the opportunity 

to discuss with loved ones and family members in advance and decide what measures would be appropriate for 

them when it comes to end-of-life care; 

Whereas the preparation of an advance directive, would advise family members, medical providers, and other persons of how an individual would want to be treated in 

certain crisis situations; 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 934 IH 

Whereas physicians, other health care providers, clergy, legal 

counsel, and family members should, or may, provide 

guidance and insight into determining the final wishes of 

a person when an advance directive is being prepared; 

Whereas to avoid any legal or medical confusion due to the 

emotions involved in end-of-life decisions, it is in the best 

interest of all Americans that each person over the age 

of 18 communicate his or her wishes by creating an advance directive; and 

Whereas the designation of the first week of April each year 

as Plan Ahead with an Advance Directive Week would 

give honor and respect to all persons as they make critical decisions about their end-of-life care and allow death 

with dignity according to their own decisions: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of Plan Ahead 

3 with an Advance Directive Week; 

4 (2) encourages each person in the United 

5 States who is over the age of 18 to prepare an ad6 vance directive to assist his or her family members 

7 and medical professionals and others as they honor 

8 his or her final wishes; and 

9 (3) encourages medical, civic, educational, reli10 gious, and other nonprofit organizations to encour11 age individuals to prepare advance directives to enVerDate Aug 31 2005 02:22 Jul 21, 2006 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR934.IH HR934

jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 934 IH 

1 sure that their wishes and rights with respect to 

2 end-of-life care are protected. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 20636 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**

Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus

**Bernard Robinson,**

Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:19

- CR

- 303

- 1

Before **Higginbotham, Graves,**  and **Ho,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *

The attorney appointed to represent Bernard Robinson has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Robinson has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 5, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-20636 Document: 00516497906 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/05/2022No. 21

- 20636

2 relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
**GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
the **APPEAL IS DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2

. Case: 21-20636 Document: 00516497906 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/05/2022
Searched for **http://www.ssa.gov/pubs/10063.html**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.ssa.gov/pubs/10063.html**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 67 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 67

 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Senate 
    should ratify the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of 
                 Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 2005

   Ms. Woolsey (for herself, Mr. Weiner, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. Case, Mr. 
Serrano, Mrs. Maloney, Ms. Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas, Ms. DeLauro, 
   Mr. Brown of Ohio, Mr. Payne, Mr. Meehan, Mr. Farr, Ms. Millender-
 McDonald, Mr. Gonzalez, Mr. Abercrombie, Ms. Watson, Mr. Udall of New 
   Mexico, Ms. Kilpatrick of Michigan, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. Inslee, Ms. 
  Slaughter, Mr. Waxman, Mr. Capuano, Mr. Pallone, Mr. Gutierrez, Mr. 
 McDermott, Mr. Owens, Mr. Wexler, Mr. Kucinich, Mr. Olver, Mrs. Jones 
of Ohio, Ms. Solis, Ms. McCollum of Minnesota, Mr. Engel, Mr. Miller of 
 North Carolina, Mr. Allen, Mr. Markey, Mr. Filner, Mr. Pascrell, Ms. 
  Berkley, Ms. Lee, Mrs. Davis of California, Mr. Stark, Mr. Udall of 
     Colorado, Ms. Carson, and Mr. Honda) submitted the following 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International 
                               Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Senate 
    should ratify the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of 
                 Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW).

    Resolved,  That it is the sense of the House of Representatives 
that--
            (1) the full realization of the rights of women is vital to 
        the development and well-being of people of all nations; and
            (2) the Senate should, therefore, give its advice and 
        consent to the ratification of the Convention on the 
        Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women.
                                 <all>
```
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

EDWARD KEELER

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 3043

[ February 21, 201 9 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800(a) motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Bernard I. Bober

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 06

- 7293CF10A

.

Edward Keeler, Punta Gorda, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

W ARNER

, C IKLIN and F ORST , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
HEAL RECORD LAYOUT

FOR REPORTING HEAL LOAN PURCHASES AND CONSOLIDATIONS

Required for 

Consolidation 

Loan

Required for 

NonConsolidation 

Loan

Field Description Columns Length Type

X X Social Security Number (No Dashes) 1-9 9 N

X X HEAL-assigned Loan ID (Required) 11-22 12 N

Date of First Disbursement for each loan (YYYYMM) 24-29 6 A/N

Originating Lender ID Number 31-36 6 A/N

X X Name of Borrower (Last, First, MI) 38-67 30 A

X X Transaction Type

Loan Purchase

P = Purchase of a Non-consolidated Loan

PC = Purchase of Consolidated Loan

Loan Consolidation

C = New Consolidated Loan

69-70 2 A

X X Date of Purchase/Consolidation (YYYYMM) 72-77 6 N

X X Servicer ID Number 79-84 6 N

X X Current Holder ID Number 85-90 6 N

X Consolidated Amount

Includes dollars and cents with decimal in position 95

92-100 9 A/N
§ 3187.6 Related institutions. ( a ) If two or more institutions are under the common control of one agency or institution or are otherwise organizationally related and apply for assistance under the Act, the Director determines under all the relevant circumstances whether they are separate museums for the purpose of establishing eligibility for assistance under these regulations. *See* § 3187.5 (Museum eligibility and burden of proof—Who may apply).
( b ) IMLS regards the following factors, among others, as showing that a related institution is a separate museum: ( 1 ) The institution has its own governing body;
( 2 ) The institution has budgetary autonomy; and
( 3 ) The institution has administrative autonomy.
#### § 603.1325 Recipient.

An organization or other entity that receives a TIA from DOE. Note that a for-profit recipient may be a firm or a segment of a firm (*e.g.*, a division or other business unit).
#### § 1800.210 Pre-award costs.

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 75948, Sept. 17, 2024.

NASA waives the approval requirement for pre-award costs of 90 days or less.

[80 FR 54701, Sept. 11, 2015. Redesignated at 85 FR 71817, Nov. 12, 2020]
§ 1.660 Where do I apply for accreditation or renewal of accreditation by a recognized accreditation body and what happens once the recognized accreditation body decides on my application? ( a ) *Submission of accreditation or renewal application to a recognized accreditation body.* A third-party certification body seeking accreditation must submit its request for accreditation or renewal of accreditation by a recognized accreditation body identified on the Web site described in § 1.690.
( b ) *Notice of records custodian after denial of application for renewal of accreditation.* An applicant whose renewal application was denied by a recognized accreditation body must notify FDA electronically, in English, within 10 business days of the date of issuance of a denial of accreditation or denial of the renewal application, of the name and contact information of the custodian who will maintain the records required by § 1.658(a) and make them available to FDA as required by § 1.658(b) and (c). The contact information for the custodian must include, at a minimum, an email address and the physical address where the records required by § 1.658(a) will be located.
( c ) *Effect of denial of an application for renewal of accreditation on food or facility certifications issued to eligible entities.* A food or facility certification issued by an accredited third-party certification body prior to issuance of the denial of its renewal application l will remain in effect until the certification expires. If FDA has reason to believe that a certification issued for purposes of section 801(q) or 806 of the FD&C Act is not valid or reliable, FDA may refuse to consider the certification in determining the admissibility of the article of food for which the certification was offered or in determining the importer's eligibility for participation in VQIP.
( d ) *Public notice of denial of an application for renewal of accreditation.* FDA will provide notice on the Web site described in § 1.690 of the date of issuance of a denial of renewal of accreditation of a third-party certification body that had previous been accredited.
#### § 1316.10 Administrative probable cause.

If the judge or magistrate is satisfied that “administrative probable cause,” as defined in section 510(d)(1) of the Act (21 U.S.C. 880(d)(1)) exists, he shall issue an administrative warrant. Administrative probable cause shall not mean criminal probable cause as defined by Federal statute or case law.
§ 1.615 What records procedures must an accreditation body have to qualify for recognition? An accreditation body seeking recognition must demonstrate that it has: ( a ) Implemented written procedures to establish, control, and retain records (including documents and data) for the period of time necessary to meet its contractual and legal obligations pertaining to this subpart and to provide an adequate basis for evaluating its program and performance; and
( b ) The capability to meet the applicable reporting and notification requirements of this subpart, if recognized.
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 11.1
                                       
                   NU-KOTE HOLDING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
            STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                (AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

                                                FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                --------------------------
                                                  JUNE 27,       JUNE 28,
                                                   1997           1996 
                                                  --------       --------
PRIMARY:
Shares outstanding:
  Weighted average number of shares outstanding    21,775         21,751
  Net effect of dilutive stock options (1)                           748
                                                  --------       --------
                                                   21,775         22,499
                                                  --------       --------
                                                  --------       --------

Net income (loss)                                 $(5,972)       $ 1,795
                                                  --------       --------
                                                  --------       --------

Net income (loss) per common share                $ (0.27)       $  0.08
                                                  --------       --------
                                                  --------       --------

FULLY DILUTED:
Shares outstanding:
  Weighted average number of shares outstanding    21,775         21,751
  Net effect of dilutive stock options (1)                           748
                                                  --------       --------
                                                   21,775         22,499
                                                  --------       --------
                                                  --------       --------

Net income (loss)                                 $(5,972)       $ 1,795
                                                  --------       --------
                                                  --------       --------

Net income (loss) per common share                $ (0.27)       $  0.08
                                                  --------       --------
                                                  --------       --------

---------------------
(1) The net effects of dilutive stock options for periods resulting in
    income are based upon the treasury stock method using average market price
    during the period for the primary amounts, and the higher of the average
    market price or the market price at the end of the period for the fully
    diluted amounts.  For periods resulting in losses, stock options are
    considered anti-dilutive and are excluded from the computation.

                                       20
§ 501.40 Issuance. ( a ) *Authority.* As authorized by section 711 of FUA and section 645 of the DEOA, the Administrator, his duly authorized agent or a Presiding Officer may, in accordance with 10 CFR 205.8, sign, issue, and serve subpoenas; issue special report orders (SRO); administer oaths and affirmations; take sworn testimony, compel attendance of and sequester witnesses; control the dissemination of any record of testimony taken pursuant to this section; and subpoena and reproduce books, papers, correspondence, memoranda, contracts, agreements, or other relevant records of tangible evidence including, but not limited to, information retained in computerized or other automated systems in the possession of the subpoenaed person.
( b ) *Petition to withdraw or modify.* Prior to the time specified for compliance in the subpoena or SRO, the person to whom the subpoena or SRO is directed may apply for its withdrawal or modification as provided in 10 CFR 205.8, except that if the subpoena or SRO is issued by a duly appointed Presiding Officer, the request to withdraw or modify must be addressed to that Presiding Officer, and its grant or denial will be decided by him.
§ 113.81 Product preparation. ( a ) Before using raw materials and ingredients susceptible to microbiological contamination, the processor shall ensure that those materials and ingredients are suitable for use in processing low-acid food. Compliance with this requirement may be accomplished by receiving the raw materials and ingredients under a supplier's guarantee that they are suitable for use, by examining them for their microbiological condition, or by other acceptable means.
( b ) Blanching by heat, when required in the preparation of food for canning, should be effected by heating the food to the required temperature, holding it at this temperature for the required time, and then either rapidly cooling the food or passing it to subsequent processing without delay. Thermophilic growth and contamination in blanchers should be minimized by the use of adequate operating temperatures and by cleaning. If the blanched food product is washed before filling, potable water should be used.
( c ) The filling of containers, either mechanically or by hand, shall be controlled so as to ensure that the filling requirements specified in the scheduled process are met.
( d ) The exhausting of containers for the removal of air shall be controlled so as to meet the conditions for which the process was designed. Compliance with the requirement may be accomplished by heat exhausting, mechanical exhausting, hot brining, or steam injection.
( e ) When the maintenance of pH (above 4.6) of a normally low-acid food is a basis for a scheduled process, there shall be careful supervision to ensure that the equilibrium pH of the finished product meets that of the scheduled process. The methodology described in § 114.90 of this chapter should be used.
( f ) When the scheduled process sets forth critical factors to prevent the growth of microorganisms not destroyed by the thermal process, the factors shall be carefully controlled to ensure that the limits established in the scheduled process are not exceeded. When normally low-acid foods require sufficient solute to permit safe processing at low temperatures, such as in boiling water, there shall be careful supervision to ensure that the equilibrium water activity (aw) of the finished product meets that of the scheduled process. The scheduled thermal processes for foods having an aw greater than 0.85 and less than the aw that would allow the growth of spores of microorganisms of public health significance shall be sufficient to render the food free of microorganisms capable of reproducing in the food under normal nonrefrigerated conditions of storage and distribution.
Editorial Note on Part 112
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 112 appear at 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 112.111 What measures must I take if I grow, harvest, pack or hold both covered and excluded produce? If you grow, harvest, pack or hold produce that is not covered in this part (*i.e.,* excluded produce in accordance with § 112.2) and also conduct such activities on covered produce, and the excluded produce is not grown, harvested, packed or held in accordance with this part, you must take measures during these covered activities, as applicable, to: ( a ) Keep covered produce separate from excluded produce (except when covered produce and excluded produce are placed in the same container for distribution); and
( b ) Adequately clean and sanitize, as necessary, any food contact surfaces that contact excluded produce before using such food contact surfaces for covered activities on covered produce.
#### § 1138.1200 Purpose of SUB Article XII.

SUB Article XII specifies policy and procedures concerning recipients' use of fixed-amount subawards under DoD grants and cooperative agreements. It thereby implements OMB guidance in 2 CFR 200.201(b) and 200.332 and other portions of 2 CFR part 200 as they apply to fixed-amount subawards.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 13, 2018

No. 04-18-00345-CR

Comfort Delando ROBERTS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR11457

Honorable Jefferson Moore, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On June 4, 2018, appellant filed a motion for the appointment of appellate counsel. The 

record before this court indicates the trial court appointed Michael Young, Chief Public 

Defender, to represent appellant on appeal. Accordingly, appellant’s motion is DENIED.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 13th day of June, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
#### LEISNER, Appellant, v. BARRETT, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

July 7, 1914.)

Action by George Leisner against Nelson T. Barrett.

No opinion. Appeal dismissed, without costs, upon stipulation filed.
Exhibit 10.3
 DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS
60 WALL STREET
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10005
  
 Re: Wellman, Inc. Credit Agreement dated as of February 27, 2008
 Funds Administrator Administrative Agent Credit
Agreement




---



##### 



Very truly yours,DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANYAMERICAS,as Administrative AgentBy:
    
    /s/ Marguerite SuttonTitle:
    
    DirectorBy:
    
    /s/ Enrique LandaetaTitle:
    
    Vice President
 
 WELLMAN, INC.By:
    
    /s/ Keith PhillipsTitle:
    
    Chief Financial Officer