alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-0 7 -00 112 -CV Da vid He nr y Ha nse n , A ppe lla nt

v. Terr y Ann Han sen , Appellee F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF B ASTROP COUNTY , 21ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 10,9 78 , HO NORAB LE H. R. TOWSLEE , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E MO R

A N D UM O P I N I O N David He nry

Hanse n has filed a

motion to di smiss t his appea l , s t at i n g that he and Terr y Ann Hanse n have e ntere d into an agree ment under which all matters in contr oversy betwee n the pa rt ie s h ave be e n f

ull y se ttl e d a nd c omp ro mis e d. We gra

nt t he mot ion and dis mis s th is a

pp e a l.

G. Alan Waldrop, Just ice Be fore J ustices Patterson, Pember ton and Waldrop Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion Filed: Jul y

5, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1085 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1085

  Celebrating the 10th anniversary of the Women's Congressional Staff 
                              Association.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 26, 2018

Ms. Frankel of Florida (for herself and Ms. Ros-Lehtinen) submitted the 
  following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Celebrating the 10th anniversary of the Women's Congressional Staff 
                              Association.

Whereas, in August 2008, a bipartisan group of female congressional staffers 
        founded the Women's Congressional Staff Association (referred to in this 
        preamble as the ``WCSA''), the first official staff association focused 
        on the professional development of female staffers;
Whereas WCSA has over 400 active members in the House of Representatives and 
        Senate;
Whereas the commitment of the WCSA to bipartisanship fosters congeniality and 
        respect in Congress;
Whereas WCSA organizes and hosts a variety of career development opportunities 
        for female staffers, such as resume reviews, networking workshops, and 
        mock interview sessions; and
Whereas WCSA provides mentoring opportunities to further the career advancement 
        and professional education of young staffers: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) celebrates the 10th anniversary of the Women's 
        Congressional Staff Association's founding (referred to in this 
        resolving clause as the ``WCSA'');
            (2) commends the WCSA on its many achievements and 
        contributions to the congressional community; and
            (3) reaffirms the commitment of the House to supporting the 
        professional development of female staff members.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 33 (Friday, February 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 7536]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3255]



[[Page 7536]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6899]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``The Aztec Pantheon and the Art Empire''

Summary: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 
of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of 
April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``The Aztec Pantheon and the Art Empire,'' 
imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, 
are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Getty Villa, 
Pacific Palisades, CA, from on or about March 24, 2010, until on or 
about July 5, 2010, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues 
yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that 
Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the Federal 
Register.

For Further Information Contact: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: February 12, 2010.
Maura M. Pally,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-3255 Filed 2-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
#### § 3373.500 Who in the NEH determines that a recipient other than an individual violated the requirements of this part?

The NEH General Counsel is the agency official authorized to make the determination under 2 CFR 182.500.
§ 835.703 Other monitoring records. The following information shall be documented and maintained: ( a ) Results of monitoring for radiation and radioactive material as required by subparts E and L of this part, except for monitoring required by § 835.1102(d);
( b ) Results of monitoring used to determine individual occupational dose from external and internal sources;
( c ) Results of monitoring for the release and control of material and equipment as required by § 835.1101; and
( d ) Results of maintenance and calibration performed on instruments and equipment as required by § 835.401(b).
[58 FR 65485, Dec. 14, 1993, as amended at 63 FR 59685, Nov. 4, 1998]
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 587 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 587

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the deduction 
   for State and local taxes is beneficial and should remain intact.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 25, 2017

 Ms. Esty of Connecticut (for herself, Mr. Courtney, Ms. DeLauro, Mr. 
     Larson of Connecticut, and Mr. Himes) submitted the following 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the deduction 
   for State and local taxes is beneficial and should remain intact.

Whereas the deduction for State and local taxes is a fundamental cornerstone of 
        American fiscal federalism;
Whereas eliminating the deduction for State and local taxes would increase taxes 
        for approximately 24 percent of taxpayers nationwide;
Whereas the deduction for State and local taxes helps State and local 
        governments fund K-12 education, economic development, job training, 
        transportation, health care, police, fire, parks, libraries, community 
        health facilities, and first responders, all of which would be at risk 
        if the deduction were eliminated;
Whereas using the sum of property tax (real estate tax and personal property 
        tax), corporate income tax, and the greater of individual income tax or 
        general sales tax as a rough measure of potentially deductible taxes, 
        the potentially deductible portion of State and local taxes was about 32 
        percent of general revenues overall in 2013; and
Whereas 60 percent of taxpayers making less than $50,000 a year claim the State 
        and local tax deduction for their local property taxes: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
the deduction for State and local taxes is beneficial to American 
taxpayers and should remain intact.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32****SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**          I, Thian Hoo Tan, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Komag, Incorporated on Form10-Q for the quarterly period ended April 2, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations ofKomag, Incorporated.       BY: /s/ Thian Hoo Tan          Thian Hoo Tan    Chief Executive Officer    Komag, Incorporated            I, Kathleen A. Bayless, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Komag, Incorporated onForm 10-Q for the quarterly period ended April 2, 2006 fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained insuch 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of Komag, Incorporated.       BY: /s/ Kathleen A. Bayless     Kathleen A. Bayless    Chief Financial Officer    Komag, Incorporated            This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemedfiled by Komag, Incorporated for purposes of Section 18 of the Security Exchange Act of 1934, asamended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toKomag, Incorporated and will be retained by Komag, Incorporated and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 1.695 Are the records obtained by FDA under this subpart subject to public disclosure?

Records obtained by FDA under this subpart are subject to the disclosure requirements under part 20 of this chapter.
§ 1138.1005 Content of SUB Article X. ( a ) *Requirement.* A DoD Component's general terms and conditions must specify requirements for recipients' monitoring of subrecipients and related post-award administration of subawards.
( b ) *Award terms and conditions.* A DoD Component's general terms and conditions must use the wording appendix J to this part provides for SUB Article X of its general terms and conditions.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 24
- 0132 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, vs. JARED GLENN BARTH,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including November 13 , 2024, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 2 2024

10/02/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0132
Editorial Note on Part 108
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 108 appear at 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 108.3 Definitions. ( a ) The definitions contained in section 201 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act are applicable to such terms when used in this part.
( b ) *Commissioner* means the Commissioner of Food and Drugs.
( c ) *Act* means the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as amended.
( d ) *Permit* means an emergency permit issued by the Commissioner pursuant to section 404 of the act for such temporary period of time as may be necessary to protect the public health.
( e ) *Manufacture, processing, or packing of food in any locality* means activities conducted in a single plant or establishment, a series of plants under a single management, or all plants in an industry or region, by a manufacturer, processor, or packer.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 734 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 734

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                        February 9 (legislative day, February 8), 2018.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to take 
from the Speaker's table the bill (H.R. 1892) to amend title 4, United States 
Code, to provide for the flying of the flag at half-staff in the event of the 
death of a first responder in the line of duty, with the Senate amendment to the 
House amendment to the Senate amendment thereto, and to consider in the House, 
without intervention of any point of order, a motion offered by the chair of the 
Committee on Appropriations or his designee that the House concur in the Senate 
amendment to the House amendment to the Senate amendment. The Senate amendment 
and the motion shall be considered as read. The motion shall be debatable for 
one hour equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member 
of the Committee on Appropriations. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the motion to adoption without intervening motion.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-6185

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

NIGEL CLARKE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Greenville. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (4:02-cr-00060-FL-5; 4:10-cv-00195-H)

Submitted: May 18, 2023 Decided: May 23, 2023

Before NIEMEYER, RICHARDSON, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nigel Clarke, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6185 Doc: 5 Filed: 05/23/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Nigel Clarke seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. 

P. 60(b) motion for relief from the district court’s prior order dismissing his initial 28 

U.S.C. § 2255 motion as time-barred and from the court’s December 2020 order denying 

prior Rule 60(b) motions. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). See generally United States v. 

McRae, 793 F.3d 392, 400 & n.7 (4th Cir. 2015). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this 

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the district court’s assessment 

of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis, 580 U.S. 100, 115-17 

(2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the motion

states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 

134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Clarke has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the 

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6185 Doc: 5 Filed: 05/23/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
exv4w2



 





Exhibit 4.2




AMENDMENT NO. 3

TO THE TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

STOCK OPTION PLAN

(AMENDED AND RESTATED AS OF MAY 12, 2000)




     Pursuant to Section 18 of the Tyler Technologies, Inc. Stock Option Plan (Amended and Restated
as of May 12, 2000) (the “Plan”), Section 5 of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read
as follows:




     5. SHARES SUBJECT TO PLAN. The Committee may not grant Options under the Plan
for more than 8,500,000 shares of Common Stock and may not grant Options to any
Participant for more than 8,500,000 shares of Common Stock, but these numbers may be
adjusted to reflect, if deemed appropriate by the Committee, any stock dividend,
stock split, share combination, recapitalization or the like, of or by the Company.
Shares to be optioned and sold may be made available from either authorized but
unissued Common Stock or Common Stock held by the Company in its treasury. Shares
that by reason of the expiration of an Option or otherwise are no longer subject to
purchase pursuant to an Option granted under the Plan may be re-offered under the
Plan.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Amendment effective as of the
18th day of May, 2006.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ H. Lynn Moore, Jr.
 

	 	 
	 

	 	Name:
	 	H. Lynn Moore, Jr.	 	 
	 

	 	Title:
	 	Vice President, General Counsel &	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Secretary
April 24, 20 12



### JUDGMENT



## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ROBERT DWAYNE SANDIFORD , Appellant

NO. 14

- 1 2

- 00 025

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

____________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. The

record indicates that the appeal should be DISMISSED . The Court orders the appeal

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion, that the appellant pay all costs expended in

this app eal, and that this decision be certified below for observance.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Form 10-Q of DOR BioPharma, Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











August 14, 2009

/s/ Christopher J. SchaberChristopher J. Schaber, Ph.D.President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 548 

Recognizing the religious and historical significance of the festival of Diwali. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 10, 2005 

Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN (for herself, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. 

HOLT, Ms. ZOE LOFGREN of California, Mr. CHANDLER, Mr. 

MCCOTTER, Mr. MEEK of Florida, Mr. STARK, Mr. MATHESON, Ms. 

HARRIS, Mr. DAVIS of Florida, Mr. WYNN, Mr. CROWLEY, Mr. LANTOS, 

Mr. HONDA, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. PRICE of North Carolina, Mr. CARDOZA, Mr. HOYER, Mr. PUTNAM, Mr. PALLONE, Ms. LEE, 

Ms. WATSON, Mr. WEXLER, Mr. ENGLISH of Pennsylvania, Mr. 

FALEOMAVAEGA, Mr. BROWN of Ohio, Mr. ENGEL, Ms. LORETTA

SANCHEZ of California, Mr. CANNON, Mr. RANGEL, Ms. BERKLEY, and 

Mrs. MALONEY) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the religious and historical significance of the 

festival of Diwali. 

Whereas Diwali, a festival of great significance to Indian 

Americans and South Asian Americans, is celebrated annually by Hindus, Sikhs, and Jains throughout the 

United States; 

Whereas there are nearly 2,000,000 Hindus in the United 

States, of which approximately 1,250,000 are of Indian 

and South Asian origin; 
2 

•HRES 548 IH 

Whereas the word ‘‘Diwali’’ is a shortened version of the 

Sanskrit term ‘‘Deepavali’’, which means ‘‘a row of 

lamps’’; 

Whereas Diwali is a festival of lights, during which celebrants 

light small oil lamps, place them around the home, and 

pray for health, knowledge, and peace; 

Whereas celebrants of Diwali believe that the rows of lamps 

symbolize the light within the individual that rids the 

soul of the darkness of ignorance; 

Whereas Diwali, falling on the last day of the last month in 

the lunar calendar, is celebrated as a day of thanksgiving 

and the beginning of the new year for many Hindus; 

Whereas for Hindus, Diwali is a celebration of the victory of 

God over demonic forces; 

Whereas for Sikhs, Diwali is feted as the day that the sixth 

founding Sikh Guru, or revered teacher, Guru 

Hargobind, was released from captivity by the Mughal 

Emperor Jehangir; and 

Whereas for Jains, Diwali marks the anniversary of the attainment of moksha or liberation by Lord Mahavira, the 

last of the Tirthankaras, who were the great teachers of 

Jain dharma, at the end of his life in 527 B.C.: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the religious and historical sig3 nificance of the festival of Diwali; and 

4 (2) requests the President to issue a proclama5 tion recognizing Diwali. 

Æ
§ 1400.215 Which nonprocurement transactions, in addition to those listed in 2 CFR 180.215, are not covered transactions? ( a ) Transactions entered into pursuant to Public Law 93-638, 88 Stat. 2203.
( b ) Under natural resource management programs, permits, licenses, exchanges, and other acquisitions of real property, rights-of-way, and easements.
( c ) Transactions concerning mineral patent claims entered into pursuant to 30 U.S.C. 22 *et seq.;* and
( d ) Water service contracts and repayments entered into pursuant to 43 U.S.C. 485.
#### § 2429.505 Who in HUD determines that a recipient who is an individual violated the requirements of this part?

The Secretary or designee is the official authorized to make the determination under 2 CFR 182.505.
Editorial Note on Part 180
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 180 appear at 79 FR 75879, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 180.760 How long may my suspension last? ( a ) If legal or debarment proceedings are initiated at the time of, or during your suspension, the suspension may continue until the conclusion of those proceedings. However, if proceedings are not initiated, a suspension may not exceed 12 months.
( b ) The suspending official may extend the 12 month limit under paragraph (a) of this section for an additional 6 months if an office of a U.S. Assistant Attorney General, U.S. Attorney, or other responsible prosecuting official requests an extension in writing. In no event may a suspension exceed 18 months without initiating proceedings under paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) The suspending official must notify the appropriate officials under paragraph (b) of this section of an impending termination of a suspension at least 30 days before the 12 month period expires to allow the officials an opportunity to request an extension.