alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.3



 Exhibit 10.3 
  
 MARATHON ACQUISITION CORP. 
 623 5th Avenue, 26th Floor 
 New York, N.Y. 10022 
  
 July 27, 2006 
  
 Marathon Management, LLC 
 623 5th Avenue, 26th Floor 
 New York, N.Y. 10022 
  
 Gentlemen: 
  
 This letter will confirm the agreement by
and between Marathon Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Marathon Management, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Management Company”), that, commencing on the
effective date (“Effective Date”) of the registration statement on form S-1 (File No. 333-134078) initial public offering (“IPO”) of the Company’s securities and continuing until the earlier
of (i) the consummation by the Company of a business combination, or (ii) the Company’s dissolution and liquidation, each as described in the Company’s final prospectus relating to the IPO (hereinafter, the earlier of such dates
is referred to as the “Termination Date”), the Management Company shall make available to the Company certain office space, administrative services and secretarial services as may be required by the Company from time to time,
at 623 5th Avenue, 26th Floor, New York, N.Y. 10022, or at such successor facilities as shall be suitable to meet the Company’s needs and as the Management Company may elect to provide in lieu of the foregoing office.
In exchange therefor, the Company shall pay the Management Company a sum of $7,500 per month on the Effective Date and continuing monthly thereafter until the Termination Date. 
  
 [Remainder of Page Intentionally Blank] 








			
	Very truly yours,
	
	MARATHON ACQUISITION CORP.
		
	By: 	 	 /s/ Michael S. Gross


	 	 	Michael S. Gross
	 	 	Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Secretary


  
  
 AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY: 
  
 MARATHON MANAGEMENT, LLC 
  

			
	By: 	 	 /s/ Michael S. Gross


	 	 	Michael S. Gross
	 	 	Managing Member
###### Editorial Note on Part 1315

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part appear at 82 FR 97041, Dec. 30, 2016.

#### § 1315.21 Individual manufacturing quotas.

The Administrator shall, on or before December 1 of each year, fix for and issue to each person registered to manufacture in bulk ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, or phenylpropanolamine who applies for a manufacturing quota an individual manufacturing quota authorizing that person to manufacture during the next calendar year a quantity of that chemical. Any manufacturing quota fixed and issued by the Administrator is subject to his authority to reduce or limit it at a later date pursuant to § 1315.26 and to his authority to revoke or suspend it at any time pursuant to §§ 1301.36, 1309.43, 1309.44, or 1309.45 of this chapter.

[72 FR 37448, July 10, 2007, as amended at 88 FR 60143, Aug. 31, 2023]
# A V A NCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Pat McCrory

Governor John E
. Skvarla, III Secretary February 25, 2013 Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming Regional Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 4 61 Forsyth Street, SW Atlanta, GA 30303-3104 SUBJECT: TCE Hemphill Road Site NPL Listing Gastonia, Gaston County, NC EPA ID:NCO 002 374445 Dear Ms
. Fleming, I am writing in response to your request for the state ofNorth Carolina's position regarding the proposed listing ofthe TCE Hemphill Road Site on the National Priorities List (NPL). The State of North Carolina supports the Environmental Protection Agency's efforts to propose this site for inclusion on the NPL. North Carolina appreciates the EPA's continued assistance to protect the state's public health and the environment. If you have any questions or require further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact Dexter Matthews, Director, Division ofWaste Management at (919) 707-8238.

cc: Dexter Matthews, NC DWM Jim Bateson, NC DWM Franklin Hill, US EPA Region 4 Jennifer Wendel, US EPA Region 4

1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601 Phone:919- 707-8600 \ Internet: w ww.ncdenr.gov An Equal Opportunity IAffirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled I 10% Post Consumer Paper
#### New York and Presbyterian Hospital, as Assignee of Albert Klau, et al., Appellants, v Allstate Insurance Company, Respondent.

[815 NYS2d 478]

In an action to recover no-fault insurance benefits under certain insurance contracts, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Cozzens, J.), dated July 21, 2005, as granted the defendant’s motion to vacate a judgment of the same court entered December 8, 2004, which is in favor of the plaintiffs and against it in the principal sum of $43,425.51, upon the defendant’s failure to appear or answer, and to extend its time to answer.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Service upon the defendant was effectuated through delivery of the summons and complaint upon the Deputy Secretary of Insurance pursuant to Insurance Law § 1212. Although the defendant’s motion to vacate the default judgment was made pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (1), under the circumstances of this case, it may be treated as a motion made under CPLR 317 as well *(see Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc. v A.C. Dutton Lbr. Co.,*67 NY2d 138, 142-143 [1986]). A defendant served with a summons other than by personal delivery or to an agent designated under CPLR 318 may obtain relief pursuant to CPLR 317 upon a showing that it did not receive notice of the summons in time to defend, and has a meritorious defense *(see Marine v Federal Ins. Co.,*293 AD2d 721 [2002]). Unlike a motion to vacate under CPLR 5015 (a) (1), it is unnecessary for a defendant seeking relief under CPLR 317 to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for its default *(see Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc. v A.C. Dutton Lbr. Co., supra*at 141; *Marinoff v Natty Realty Corp.,*17 AD3d 412, 413 [2005]; *Rifelli v Fireside Homes Corp.,*152 AD2d 629, 631 [1989]; *Simon & Schuster v Howe Plastics & Chems. Co.,*105 AD2d 604, 605 [1984]). The defendant met its burden of showing that it did not receive actual notice of the summons in time to defend *(see Marine v Federal Ins. Co., supra; cf. Kaperonis v Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.,*254 AD2d 334 [1998]; *Board of Mgrs. of Landings at Patchogue Condominium v 263 Riv. Ave. Corp.,*243 AD2d 668 [1997]; *Fleetwood Park Corp. v Jerrick Waterproofing*
      *969
      *Co.,*203 AD2d 238, 239 [1994]; *Anchor Sav. Bank v Alpha Developers,*143 AD2d 711, 713-714 [1988]) and that its defenses are meritorious *(see*11 NYCRR 65-3.8; *Hospital for Joint Diseases v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.,*8 AD3d 533 [2004]; *Presbyterian Hosp. in City of N.Y. v General Acc. Ins. Co. of Am.,*229 AD2d 479 [1996]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in vacating the default judgment and extending the defendant’s time to answer. Miller, J.P., Ritter, Luciano, Spolzino and Dillon, JJ., concur.
# EUR-Lex - 31994D0383 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31994D0383

**94/383/EC: Commission Decision of 3 June 1994 on the criteria to be applied to establishments manufacturing meat products without having an industrial structure or an industrial production capacity (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal L 174 , 08/07/1994 P. 0033 - 0033 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 59 P. 0009 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 59 P. 0009 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 3 June 1994 on the criteria to be applied to establishments manufacturing meat products without having an industrial structure or an industrial production capacity (Text with EEA relevance) (94/383/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 77/99/EEC of 21 December 1976 on health problems affecting the production and marketing of meat products and certain other products of animal origin (1), as last amended by Directive 92/118/EEC (2), and in particular

Article 9

(5) thereof,

Whereas it is necessary to lay down criteria for the classification of establishments in order to ensure a uniform implementation of Directive 77/99/EEC;

Whereas Member States have communicated to the Commission the criteria which they have adopted to assess whether an establishment or a category of establishments has no industrial structure or production capacity;

Whereas the derogations referred to in Article 9 (1) and (2) of Directive 77/99/EEC concern only the structure of the estabishments and not the hygienic requirements laid down in the said Directive;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

1. For the purpose of granting the derogations referred to in Article 9 (1) and (2) of Directive 77/99/EEC, Member States shall fix a maximum production limit for each establishment.

When fixing that limit, they shall take particular account of the following parameters: the establishment's structure and layout, the flow of the products, and the storage capacity for raw materials and end products.

2. The granting of the derogations referred to in paragraph 1 is subject to observance by each establishment of the production limit laid down in pursuance of paragraph 1.

3. In no case shall the production limit laid down in paragraph 1 exceed a quantity of 7,5 tonnes of finished product per week, or one tonne per week in the case of foie gras production.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 3 June 1994.

For the Commission

René STEICHEN

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 26, 31. 1. 1977, p. 85. Updated by Directive 92/5/EEC (OJ No L 57, 2. 3. 1992, p. 1).

(2) OJ No L 62, 15. 3. 1993, p. 49).
#### § 2424.1135 Do Federal agencies coordinate limited denial of participation actions?

Federal agencies do not coordinate limited denial of participation actions. As stated in § 2424.1100, a limited denial of participation is a HUD-specific action and applies only to HUD activities.
# EUR-Lex - 31994D0658 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31994D0658

**94/658/EC: Commission Decision of 30 September 1994 amending Decision 94/360/EC on the reduced frequency of physical checks of consignments of certain products to be imported from third countries **

*
Official Journal L 256 , 04/10/1994 P. 0029 - 0029 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 61 P. 0098 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 61 P. 0098 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 30 September 1994 amending Decision 94/360/EC on the reduced frequency of physical checks of consignments of certain products to be imported from third countries (94/658/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 90/675/EEC of 10 December 1990 laying down the principles governing the organization of veterinary checks on products entering the Community from third countries (1), as last amended by Directive 92/118/EEC (2), and in particular Article 8 (3) thereof,

Whereas Article 8 (3) of Directive 90/675/EEC allows for a reduction in the frequency of checks of consignments of products imported from third countries;

Whereas in Decision 94/360/EC (3), the Commission adopted measures on the reduction in frequency of physical checks of consignments of products to be imported from third countries; whereas these frequencies should apply from 1 October 1994, following a review of the frequencies on the basis of the results of all checks on imported consignments of products;

Whereas further progress is necessary on the harmonization of import conditions on imported products;

Whereas further experience of Member States checks on consignments is necessary to carry out the review of the frequencies foreseen in Article 3 (3); whereas it is therefore necessary to defer the date of application of the frequencies to 1 March 1995, and the deadline for the first submission by Member States of the results of checks to 1 January 1995;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Decision 94/360/EC is hereby amended as follows:

- in Article 3 (1), '1 September 1994' is replaced by '1 January 1995',

- in Article 3 (3), '1 October 1994' is replaced by '1 March 1995',

- in Article 7, '1 October 1994' is replaced by '1 March 1995'.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 September 1994.

For the Commission

René STEICHEN

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 373, 31. 12. 1990, p. 1.

(2) OJ No L 62, 15. 3. 1993, p. 49.

(3) OJ No L 158, 25. 6. 1994, p. 41.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                      28,620,000
<SECURITIES>                                   987,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,959,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   165,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            40,093,000
<PP&E>                                       3,806,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,751,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              42,241,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,130,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        82,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  32,029,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                42,241,000
<SALES>                                     35,990,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            35,990,000
<CGS>                                       10,485,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               16,909,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               456,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         (1,186,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,342,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (90,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,432,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,432,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .28
        

</TABLE>
#### Karl J. Mannain, Respondent, v. Edward Mulcahey, Respondent. In the Matter of the Arbitration between Karl J. Mannain, Respondent, and Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation, Appellant.

Order of Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated November 13, 1968, affirmed. No opinion. Appeal from order of the same court dated August 16, 1968 dismissed as moot. This order was superseded by the order dated November 13, 1968. A single bill of costs is allowed to respondents, jointly, against appellant, to cover both appeals. Christ, P. J., Hopkins, Munder, Latham and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
§ 963.1 Purpose. ( a ) The purpose of this part is to establish DOE methods and criteria for determining the suitability of the Yucca Mountain site for the location of a geologic repository. DOE will use these methods and criteria in analyzing the data from the site characterization activities required under section 113 of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act.
( b ) This part does not address other information that must be considered and submitted to the President, and made available to the public, by the Secretary under section 114 of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act if the Yucca Mountain site is recommended for development as a geologic repository.
§ 1250.45 Food handling facilities on railroad conveyances. ( a ) Both kitchens and pantries of cars hereafter constructed or reconstructed shall be equipped with double sinks, one of which shall be of sufficient size and depth to permit complete immersion of a basket of dishes during bactericidal treatment; in the pantry a dishwashing machine may be substituted for the double sinks. If chemicals are used for bactericidal treatment, 3-compartment sinks shall be provided.
( b ) A sink shall be provided for washing and handling cracked ice used in food or drink and shall be used for no other purpose.
( c ) Lavatory facilities for the use of the dining car crew shall be provided on each dining car. Such facilities shall be conveniently located and used for hand and face washing only: *Provided, however,* That where the kitchen and pantry on a dining car hereafter constructed or reconstructed are so partitioned or separated as to impede free passage between them lavatory facilities shall be provided in both the kitchen and the pantry.
( d ) Wherever toilet and lavatory facilities required by paragraph (c) of this section are not on the dining car, a lavatory shall be provided on the dining car for the use of employees. The lavatory shall be conveniently located and used only for the purpose for which it is installed.
#### § 1301.42 Purpose of hearing.

If requested by a person entitled to a hearing, the Administrator shall hold a hearing for the purpose of receiving factual evidence regarding the issues involved in the denial, revocation, or suspension of any registration, and the granting of any application for registration to import or to manufacture in bulk a basic class of controlled substance listed in Schedule I or II. Extensive argument should not be offered into evidence but rather presented in opening or closing statements of counsel or in memoranda or proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law.

[62 FR 13956, Mar. 24, 1997]
###### Editorial Note on Part 112

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 112 appear at 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

#### § 112.23 What requirements apply regarding supervisors?

You must assign or identify personnel to supervise (or otherwise be responsible for) your operations to ensure compliance with the requirements of this part.
Exhibit 23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-160581), filed on July 15, 2009, of Cicero Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) of our report dated March 31, 2014, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of the Company included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, as of and for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, filed on March 31, 2014.








/s/ Cherry Bekaert LLP





Raleigh, North Carolina


March 31, 2014
###### Editorial Note on Part 12

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 12 appear at 88 FR 45064, July 14, 2023.

#### § 12.91 Time and place of prehearing conference.

A prehearing conference will commence at the date, time, and place announced in the notice of hearing, or in a later notice, or as specified by the presiding officer in a notice modifying a prior notice. At that conference the presiding officer will establish the methods and procedures to be used in developing the evidence, determine reasonable time periods for the conduct of the hearing, and designate the times and places for the production of witnesses for direct and cross-examination if leave to conduct oral examination is granted on any issue, as far as practicable at that time.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,741
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,811
<ALLOWANCES>                                       225
<INVENTORY>                                      1,094
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,766
<PP&E>                                           6,173
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,460
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,936
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,614
<BONDS>                                          5,690
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,626
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,936
<SALES>                                          1,280
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,472
<CGS>                                              892
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,382
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,945
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 137
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (992)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (992)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (992)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Ames Test

Sanitized
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>            5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED 
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS  AT DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND THE AUDITED CONSOLIDATED 
STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 OF GLOBAL DIRECTMAIL 
CORP AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>          1,000
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                        42,029
<SECURITIES>                                   5,050
<RECEIVABLES>                                154,516
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                  129,966
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             359,943
<PP&E>                                        33,988
<DEPRECIATION>                                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               454,439
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        165,317
<BONDS>                                        2,493
<COMMON>                                         382
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<OTHER-SE>                                   286,247
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 454,439
<SALES>                                    1,435,654
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           1,435,654
<CGS>                                      1,147,098
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              1,147,098
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             224,208
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (2,728)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               67,076
<INCOME-TAX>                                  25,824
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           41,252
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
 <NET-INCOME>                                 41,252
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   1.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   1.11
        

</TABLE>