alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1002.50 Special exemptions. ( a ) Manufacturers of electronic products may submit to the Director a request, together with accompanying justification, for exemption from any requirements listed in table 1 of § 1002.1. The request must specify each requirement from which an exemption is requested. In addition to other information that is required, the justification must contain documented evidence showing that the product or product type for which the exemption is requested does not pose a public health risk and meets at least one of the following criteria: ( 1 ) The products cannot emit electronic product radiation in sufficient intensity or of such quality, under any conditions of operation, maintenance, service, or product failure, to be hazardous;
( 2 ) The products are produced in small quantities;
( 3 ) The products are used by trained individuals and are to be used by the same manufacturing corporation or for research, investigation, or training.
( 4 ) The products are custom designed and used by trained individuals knowledgeable of the hazards; or
( 5 ) The products are produced in such a way that the requirements are inappropriate or unnecessary.
( b ) The Director may, subject to any conditions that the Director deems necessary to protect the public health, exempt manufacturers from all or part of the record and reporting requirements of this part on the basis of information submitted in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section or such other information which the Director may possess if the Director determines that such exemption is in keeping with the purposes of the Act.
( c ) The Director will provide written notification of the reason for any denial. If the exemption is granted, the Director will provide written notification of: ( 1 ) The electronic product or products for which the exemption has been granted;
( 2 ) The requirements from which the product is exempted; and
( 3 ) Such conditions as are deemed necessary to protect the public health and safety. Copies of exemptions shall be available upon request from the Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Division of Mammography Quality Standards, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 3621, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002.
( d ) The Director may, on the Director's own motion, exempt certain classes of products from the reporting requirements listed in table 1 of § 1002.1, provided that the Director finds that such exemption is in keeping with the purposes of the act.
( e ) Manufacturers of products for which there is no applicable performance standard under parts 1020 through 1050 of this chapter and for which an investigational device exemption has been approved under § 812.30 of this chapter or for which a premarket approval application has been approved in accordance with § 814.44(d) of this chapter are exempt from submitting all reports listed in table 1 of § 1002.1.
[60 FR 48387, Sept. 19, 1995, as amended at 72 FR 17401, Apr. 9, 2007; 75 FR 20916, Apr. 22, 2010; 85 FR 18444, Apr. 2, 2020]
2007-1898.

#### State v. Hines.

Allen App. No. 1-06-86, 2007-Ohio-3126. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

Pfeifer, J., dissents.
#### REALTY ADVERTISING & SUPPLY CO. v. W. J. KELLS MFG. CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 19, 1914.)

Action by the Realty Advertising & Supply Company against the W. J. Kells Manufacturing Company.

No opinion. Application denied, with $10 costs. Order signed. See, also, 147 N. Y. Supp. 565.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 956 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 956

To regulate monitoring of electronic communications between a prisoner 
 in a Bureau of Prisons facility and that prisoner's attorney or other 
             legal representative, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2017

 Mr. Jeffries (for himself and Mr. Collins of Georgia) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To regulate monitoring of electronic communications between a prisoner 
 in a Bureau of Prisons facility and that prisoner's attorney or other 
             legal representative, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Effective Assistance of Counsel in 
the Digital Era Act''.

SEC. 2. MONITORING OF ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN PRISONER AND 
              ATTORNEY.

    (a) Prohibition on Monitoring.--Not later than 180 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, the Attorney General shall modify 
any program or system through which a prisoner (as such term is defined 
in section 107) sends or receives an electronic communication (as such 
term is defined in section 2510 of title 18, United States Code, and 
including the Trust Fund Limited Inmate Computer System) to exclude 
from monitoring the contents (as such term is defined in section 2510 
of title 18, United States Code) of an electronic communication between 
a prisoner in a Bureau of Prisons facility and his or her attorney or 
other legal representative.
    (b) Retention of Contents.--The modification required under 
subsection (a) may allow for the retention of the contents of the 
electronic communications described in subsection (a).
    (c) Exception.--If a court of competent jurisdiction determines 
that there is sufficient evidence to support a reasonable belief of the 
Government that the information contained in an electronic 
communication described in subsection (a) was for the purpose of 
perpetrating a fraud or crime, an in camera review of the contents of 
the communication may be conducted.
                                 <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 2.334 Implementing hearing schedule for proceeding. ( a ) Unless the Commission directs otherwise in a particular proceeding, the presiding officer assigned to the proceeding shall, based on information and projections provided by the parties and the NRC staff, take appropriate action to maintain the hearing schedule established by the presiding officer in accordance with 10 CFR 2.332(a) of this part for the completion of the evidentiary record and, as appropriate, the issuance of its initial decision.
( b ) *Modification of hearing schedule.* A hearing schedule may not be modified except upon a finding of good cause by the presiding officer or the Commission. In making such a good cause determination, the presiding officer or the Commission should take into account the following factors, among other things: ( 1 ) Whether the requesting party has exercised due diligence to adhere to the schedule;
( 2 ) Whether the requested change is the result of unavoidable circumstances; and
( 3 ) Whether the other parties have agreed to the change and the overall effect of the change on the schedule of the case.
( c ) The presiding officer shall provide written notification to the Commission any time during the course of the proceeding when it appears that there will be a delay of more than forty-five (45) days in meeting any of the dates for major activities in the hearing schedule established by the presiding officer under 10 CFR 2.332(a), or that the completion of the record or the issuance of the initial decision will be delayed more than sixty (60) days beyond the time specified in the hearing schedule established under 10 CFR 2.332(a). The notification must include an explanation of the reasons for the projected delay and a description of the actions, if any, that the presiding officer or the Board proposes to take to avoid or mitigate the delay.
[70 FR 20461, Apr. 20, 2005]
§ 1040.11 Specific purpose laser products. ( a ) *Medical laser products.* Each medical laser product shall comply with all of the applicable requirements of § 1040.10 for laser products of its class. In addition, the manufacturer shall: ( 1 ) Incorporate in each Class III or IV medical laser product a means for the measurement of the level of that laser radiation intended for irradiation of the human body. Such means may have an error in measurement of no more than 20 percent when calibrated in accordance with paragraph (a)(2) of this section. Indication of the measurement shall be in International System Units. The requirements of this paragraph do not apply to any laser radiation that is all of the following: ( i ) Of a level less than the accessible limits of Class IIIa; and
( ii ) Used for relative positioning of the human body; and
( iii ) Not used for irradiation of the human eye for ophthalmic purposes.
( 2 ) Supply with each Class III or IV medical laser product instructions specifying a procedure and schedule for calibration of the measurement system required by paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
( 3 ) Affix to each medical laser product, in close proximity to each aperture through which is emitted accessible laser radiation in excess of the accessible emission limits of Class I, a label bearing the wording: “Laser aperture.”
( b ) *Surveying, leveling, and alignment laser products.* Each surveying, leveling. or alignment laser product shall comply with all of the applicable requirements of § 1040.10 for a Class I, IIa, II or IIIa laser product and shall not permit human access to laser radiation in excess of the accessible emission limits of Class IIIa.
( c ) *Demonstration laser products.* Each demonstration laser product shall comply with all of the applicable requirements of § 1040.10 for a Class I, IIa, II, or IIIa laser product and shall not permit human access to laser radiation in excess of the accessible emission limits of Class I and, if applicable, Class IIa, Class II, or Class IIIa.
[50 FR 33702, Aug. 20, 1985]
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 27, 2021

No. 04-21-00404-CV

Fernando GUERRA,

Appellant

v.

Debra GUERRA, Ebra Trejo, and Michael Reyes,

Appellees

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018-CI-14451

Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr., Judge Presiding

ORDER

The clerk’s record was due to be filed with this court on October 22, 2021. See TEX. R. 

APP. P. 35.1. After the due date, the Bexar County District Clerk notified this court that 

Appellant has not paid the clerk’s fee for preparing the record and Appellant is not entitled to a 

free clerk’s record. 

We ORDER Appellant to provide written proof to this court within TEN DAYS of the 

date of this order that (1) the clerk’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay 

the clerk’s fee, or (2) Appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the clerk’s fee. See id. R. 

20.1. 

If Appellant fails to respond as ordered, this appeal will be dismissed for want of 

prosecution without further notice. See id. R. 37.3(b).

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 27th day of October, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
# EUR-Lex - 31991R1605 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31991R1605

**Council Regulation (EEC) No 1605/91 of 10 June 1991 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1784/77 concerning the certification of hops **

*
Official Journal L 149 , 14/06/1991 P. 0014 - 0014 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 37 P. 0255 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 37 P. 0255 *

COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) No 1605/91 of 10 June 1991 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1784/77 concerning the certification of hops

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1696/71 of 26 July 1971 on the common organization of the market in hops (1), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 3577/90 (2), and in particular Article 2 (4) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Whereas Regulation (EEC) No 1784/77 (3) as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 2039/85 (4), makes provision for circumstances under which hops may be processed into hop products;

Whereas in practice, owing to technical development, not only cone hops are used for the manufacturing of products prepared from hops, but also hop products; whereas, in order to take account of technical development and management practice, the references made to the processing of hops in Regulation (EEC) No 1784/77 should be amended so that hop products may be used for further processing,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: Article 1

Regulation (EEC) No 1784/77 is hereby amended as follows:

1. In Article 7, the expression 'hops certified in the Community' shall be replaced by the term 'hops certified in the Community, certified hop products prepared therefrom'.

2. Article 8 (3) shall be replaced by the following:

'3. However, certified hops of Community origin and certified hop products prepared therefrom which are from the same harvest but of different varieties and from different production areas may be blended in the manufacture of powder and extracts provided that the certificate accompanying the product states:

(a) the varieties used, the production areas and the year of harvesting;

(b) the percentage weight of each variety used in the blend; if hop products have been used in combination with cone hops for the manufacturing of hop products, or if different hop products have been used, the percentage weight of each variety based on the quantity of cone hops which was used for the preparation of the input products;

(c) the reference numbers of the certificates issued for the hops and the hop products used.' Article 2 This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities. This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Luxembourg, 10 June 1991. For the Council

The President

J.-C. JUNCKER (1) OJ No L 175, 4. 8. 1971, p. 1. (2) OJ No L 353, 17. 12. 1990, p. 23. (3) OJ No L 200, 8. 8. 1977, p. 1. (4) OJ No L 193, 25. 7. 1985, p. 1.
# m8767.docx

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 6.3.2018 C(2018) 1495 final PUBLIC VERSION To the notifying parties: Subject : Case M. 8767 - CDPQ / HYPERION INSURANCE GROUP Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1 )( b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 1 and Article 57 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area 2 Dear Sir or Madam, 1. On 12 February 2018 , the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec (‘CDPQ’, Canada), together with General Atlantic Hawthorn BV (‘GA’, The Netherlands), part of General Atlantic Group (‘GA Group’, United States), and certain natural persons , acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint c ontrol of Hyperion Insurance Group Limited ( ‘ Hyperion ’, UK) by way of purchase of shares . 3 2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are: - for CDPQ : long-term institutional investor that manages funds for public and private pension and insurance funds, active worldwide, - for Hyperion : insurance and reinsurance broker, and underwriting agency, active worldwide, - for GA : investment holding company, part of GA Group, a private equity firm active worldwide. 3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5 ( b ) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 . 4 4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1 )( b) of the Merger Regulation and Article 57 of the EEA Agreement .
For the Commission ( Signed )
Johannes LAITENBERGER Director - General
(1)
OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ( the ' Merger Regulation ' ). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( ' TFEU ' ) has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of ' Community ' by ' Union ' and ' common market ' by ' internal market ' . The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.
(2) OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3 ( the ' EEA Agreement ' ).
(3) Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 64 , 20.02.2018 , p. 17.
(4)
OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5 .
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,598,726
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,593,017
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (78,500)
<INVENTORY>                                  1,425,392
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,649,418
<PP&E>                                       1,270,715
<DEPRECIATION>                               (928,674)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,849,266
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,680,840
<BONDS>                                      2,028,036
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       510,037
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,630,353
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,849,266
<SALES>                                      3,587,059
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,587,059
<CGS>                                        1,741,770
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,741,770
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,241,975
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             (396,686)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             173,146
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (569,832)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    25,040
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (594,872)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.58)
        

</TABLE>
#### § 1003.1 Applicability.

The provisions of this part are applicable to electronic products which were manufactured after October 18, 1968.
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

July 25, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00474

- CR

Raymond DANIELS

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CR3242 Honorable Mary D. Roman, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The trial court’s cer tification in this appeal states “this criminal case is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” On July 1 6, 2018, we ordered Appellant to
cause an amended t rial court certification to be filed in this court by August 15, 2018, or we would dismiss this appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d). We suspended the other appellate deadlines pending further order of this court.

On July 24, 2018, Appellant filed a mot ion to permit filing of the reporter’s record. The motion states the court reporter’s “ record has not been filed because of the order suspending appellate deadlines.”

Our July 16 , 2018 order suspending the appellate timetable is not a stay of all

procee dings; it does not prohibit a party from filing documents in the appeal. Instead, it temporarily relieves the parties, the district clerk, and the court reporter from the requirement to file documents that would otherwise be due under the appellate timeta ble.

Appellant’s motion is GRANTED IN PART. We ORDER the court reporter to file the reporter’s record for the May 18, 2018 plea hearing within TEN DAYS of the date of this order. In accordance with our July 16, 2018 order, t he amended trial court certi fication, or a motion to dismiss this appeal, is due on August 15, 2018.

All othe r appellate deadlines remain SUSPENDED pending further order of this court._________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 25th day of July, 2018

.

___________________________________ K eith E. H ottle Clerk of Court
2/11/2015 TDCJ Offender Details

# ~) 

# ""'b.5/p
- 0 J TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE 

# m TOCJ Home 

# Ell New Offender Se;wch 

# Offender Information Details I Return to Search list 

# I
SID Number: 04078538 TDCJ Number: 01828820 Name: JONES,VIRGIL Race: 

### B Gender: M DOB: 1966-02-09 Maximum Sentence Date: LIFE SENTENCE Current Facility: ESTELLE Projected Release Date: LIFE SENTENCE Parole Eligibility Date: 2041-12-06 Offender Visitation Eligible: YES 

### Information provided is updated once daily during weekdays and multiple times perday
. on visitation days. Because this information is subject to change, family members and friends are encouraged to call the unitprior to traveling for a visit.
SPECIAL INFORMATION FOR SCHEDULED RELEASE: Scheduled Release Date: Scheduled Release Type: Scheduled Release Location: 

# Parole Review Information Offense Histor : Offense Offender is not scheduled for release at this time. Will be determined when release date is scheduled. Will be determined when release date is scheduled.

Sentence Sentence (YYhttp://offender.tdcj .state.tx. us/OffenderSearchioffenderDetai l.action?sid=04078538 

### •

1/22111/2015 TDCJ Offender Details Date Offense Date County Case No.**MM~DD}** 1995-06-01 INDEC W/CHILD 1998-03-31 BRAZOS 24,048-272 5-00-00 2000-05-24 ATTEMPTED FAIL TO 2000-09-28 HARRIS 847927 1-00-00 REGISTER 2010-06-01 INDECENCY W/CHILD 2012-12-14 BRAZOS 12-00451- 9999-99-99 CONTACT CRF-272

The Texas Department of Criminal Justice updates this information regularly to ensure that it is complete and accurate, however this information can change quickly. Therefore, the information on this site may not reflect the true current location, status, scheduled termination date, or other information regarding an offender. For questions and comments, you may contact the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, at (936) 295-6371 or webadmin@tdcj.texas.gov. This information is made available to the public and law enforcement in the interest ofpublic safety. Any unauthorized use ofthis information is forbidden and subject to criminalprosecution. New Offender Search TDCJ Home Page

http://offender.tdcj .state.tx. us/OffenderSearchioffenderDetai l.action?sid= 04078538 212