alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Balance
Sheet, Statement of Operations, Statement of Cash Flows and Notes thereto
incorporated in Part I, Item 1. of this Form 10-Q and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          35,512
<SECURITIES>                                    14,961
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,432,500
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,482,973
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,482,973
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          730,603
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,599
<OTHER-SE>                                     134,771
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,482,972
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 (371)
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                41,114
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (41,485)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (41,485)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                       21,020
<NET-INCOME>                                  (41,485)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I, Thian Hoo Tan, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Komag, Incorporated on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July
4, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Komag, Incorporated.

                                                     BY: /s/ Thian Hoo Tan

                                                     Thian Hoo Tan
                                                     Chief Executive Officer

      I, Kathleen A. Bayless, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Komag, Incorporated on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended July 4, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Komag, Incorporated.

                                                     BY: /s/ Kathleen A. Bayless

                                                     Kathleen A. Bayless
                                                     Chief Financial Officer

      This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the
extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by Komag, Incorporated for purposes
of Section 18 of the Security Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Komag, Incorporated and will be retained by Komag, Incorporated and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### Martin , Michae l (OST ) DO T ' O S ^ - 9003 ^

- \ \^L \ ( ^ From : Susa n Mikesi c [smikesic@yahoo.com ] Sent : Monday , Apri l 19 , 201 0 8:2 5 A M To : EA S (OST) Subject : fligh t servic e I wante dt o provide dfeedbac k o n th e propose dchange s t o servic e at th e Altoona-Blai r

count y airport . I frequentl y fl y out

o f thi s airport

an dvery muc h lik e th e curren t carrie r an dconnectio n t o th e Dulle s Int' l airport . I fly al l ove r

th e countr y an dhav e foun dlittl e proble mwith connectin g flight s a t thi s airport

an dhav e neve r experience s afligh t

cancellatio n unde r

th e curren t

carrier . In addition , I woul dno t lik e t o fl y ou t

o f thi s airport o n aver y smal l pla n becaus e o f

safet y concerns . To o man y time s yo u hea r o f plan e crashe s o n very smal l planes . I t woul dmak e m e conside r th e Stat e Colleg e airport an alternativ e airport

sinc e the y hav e large r plans....an dI don' t

lik e th e Phill y airpor t

whic h offer s th e connectin g flights . Than k yo u for allowin g th e publi c t o offer thei r feedbac k o n th e curren t

scenario . I jus t

hop e w e maintai n th e curren t carrier . Than k you . Susa n Mikesi c ;" ;

C 3
MEMORANDUM March 16, 2011

SUBJECT: Meeting with the I llinois Corn Growers Association on Proposed Rules for E15 FROM: Jim Caldwell , Office of Transportation and Air Quality (OTAQ) TO: Air and Radiation Docket (6102T) , Docket ID No. EPA - HQ - OAR - 2010 - 0448 Date of Meeting: March 15, 2011 Location: 1310 LStreet, NW, Washington, DC 20005 Attendees: Way ne Anderson

– Illinois Corn Growers Association David Beaudreau, Jr. – DC L egislative & Regulatory Services, Inc. Jessica Bennett

– National Corn Growers Association Tim L entz
– Il linois Corn Growers Association Dave Loos

– Illinois Corn Growers Association Jim Caldwell

– EPA/OTAQ Mary Manners

– EPA/OTAQ Deborah Wood

– E PA/OTAQ Mr. L oos was interested in the timing for the final rule. We said this spring. Mr. L oos stated that the E15 pump labels should be informational and not alarming , and marketers should have flexibility

in the size and other aspects of the labels . Several E15 issues unrelated to the rulemaking were also discussed.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T V I CTO R O SW A LD O G U ERRA B AU T I S T A, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 10- 70654 A ge nc yN o. A 095- 184- 895 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d Jul y12, 2011 ** B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , A L A R C Ó N , an dL E A V Y , C i rcu i tJu d g es. V i c t orO s w a l do G ue rr aB aut i s t a , anat i ve a nd c i t i z e n of G ua t e m a l a , pe t i t i ons f o rr e v ie w o f

th e B o ar do f

I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls ’ ( “B I A ” ) o r d e rd e n y in g h is m ot i on t o r e ope n pr oc e e di ngs ba s e d on i ne f f e c t i ve a s s i s t anc e of

c ouns e l . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f orabus e of

di s c r e t i on the de ni a l of 

# FI LED JU L 25 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 70654 2 am ot i on t o r e ope n, a nd w e r e vi e w de novo que s t i ons of l aw , i nc l udi ng c l a i m s of in e f f e c tiv e a s s is tan c e o f

c o u n s e l. H

erna ndezv. Mukasey , 524 F . 3d 1014, 1017 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 8 ) . We d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T h e B I A d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n in d e n y in g G u e rr aB au tis ta ’s m o tio n to re op en on the grou nd thathe fa i l ed t o sho w he w as prej ud i ce d b y hi s f orm er c o u n s e l’s c o n du c t. Se e I tu rr i b a rr i a v . I

NS , 321 F . 3d 889, 899- 90 ( 9th C i r . 2003) (pre j ud i ce re sul t s w hen the performance of coun se l “ w as so i nadequ at e thati tm ay have aff ec t ed the ou t com e of the proceedi ng s” ) ( i nt ernal qu ot at i on m arks om i tt ed). G u e rr aB au tis ta ’s c o n te n tio n th a t an im m ig r a tio n c o n s u ltan t p r o v id e dh im w ith in e f f e c tiv e a s s is tan c e o f

c o u n s e l is f

o r e c lo s e d . See H

erna ndez , 52 4 F . 3d at 1 0 2 0 ( k n o w in g r e lian c e up o n th e a d v ic e o f an o n - a tto rn e yc an n o t s up p o rt ac la im f o rin e f f e c tiv e a s s is tan c e o f

c o u n s e l in ar e m o v a l p r o c e e d in g ) . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6535

LARRY LAMONT BUSH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JACK KAVANAUGH, Commissioner; RONALD

HUTCHINSON, Warden; SEWALL B. SMITH, Warden;

BERNARD FORD, Captain; JAKE SUTTON, Sergeant;

R. EULISS, Captain,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-02-

3780-AMD)

Submitted: September 1, 2004 Decided: September 28, 2004

Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Lamont Bush, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,

Attorney General, Stephanie Judith Lane Weber, OFFICE OF THE

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Larry Lamont Bush appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bush v.

Kavanaugh, No. CA-02-3780-AMD (D. Md. Mar. 4, 2004). We grant the

motion to submit on the informal briefs and dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
###### Editorial Note on Part 180

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 180 appear at 79 FR 75879, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 180.40 How are these guidelines maintained?

The Interagency Committee on Debarment and Suspension established by section 4 of E.O. 12549 recommends to the OMB any needed revisions to the guidelines in this part. The OMB publishes proposed changes to the guidelines in the Federal Register for public comment, considers comments with the help of the Interagency Committee on Debarment and Suspension, and issues the final guidelines.
###### Editorial Note on Part 180

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 180 appear at 79 FR 75879, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 180.225 How do I know if a transaction in which I may participate is a covered transaction?

As a participant in a transaction, you will know that it is a covered transaction because the Federal agency regulations governing the transaction, the appropriate Federal agency official or participant at the next higher tier who enters into the transaction with you, will tell you that you must comply with applicable portions of this part.
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

 

I, Erin M. Rohde, certify that:

 

(a)                                 A review of the Servicer’s activities and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement during the period from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014 has been made under my supervision.

 

(b)                                 To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period.

 

 
| Dated March 17, 2015 |                                    |
|---------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                      |                                    |
|                      | /s/ Erin M. Rohde                       |
|                      | Erin M. Rohde                           |
|                      | Assistant Treasurer of                  |
|                      | Ford Motor Credit Company   LLC,        |
|                      | as Servicer of Ford Credit   Auto Owner |
|                      | Trust 2013-A                            |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 638 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 638

 Recognizing the Aviation Cadet Museum in Eureka Springs, Arkansas, as 
        the national aviation cadet museum of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 30, 2017

  Mr. Womack (for himself, Mr. Hill, Mr. Westerman, and Mr. Crawford) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                           on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Recognizing the Aviation Cadet Museum in Eureka Springs, Arkansas, as 
        the national aviation cadet museum of the United States.

Whereas the Aviation Cadet Museum was founded in 1994 by former aviation cadet 
        and Air Force First Lieutenant Errol Severe;
Whereas, from 1917 until 1965, the flying cadet and succeeding aviation cadet 
        programs served as the primary production source for nearly 500,000 
        joint service pilots, navigators, and bombardiers;
Whereas the bravery, courage, dedication, and heroism of aviators and supporting 
        ground crews from the Army Air Corps and the Army Air Forces were 
        critical factors in defeating the enemies of the United States during 
        World War I and World War II;
Whereas the Aviation Cadet Museum in Eureka Springs, Arkansas, is the only 
        museum in the United States that exists exclusively to preserve and 
        promote an understanding of the role of aviation cadets in the 20th 
        century; and
Whereas the Aviation Cadet Museum is dedicated to--

    (1) celebrating the spirit of the United States; and

    (2) recognizing the teamwork, collaboration, patriotism, and courage of 
the men who trained for and fought in, as well as those individuals on the 
home front who mobilized and supported, the national aviation effort: Now, 
therefore, be it

    Resolved, That the House of Representatives recognizes the Aviation 
Cadet Museum in Eureka Springs, Arkansas, as the national aviation 
cadet museum of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
No. 17,392.

#### Edwards et al., Trustees of the School City of Peru, v. State, ex rel. Cox.

Filed December 19, 1895.

From the Miami Circuit Court.

*Mitchell & Cole,*for appellants.

*W. B. McClintic,*for appellee.

Monks, J.

The questions involved in this case are the same as those in *Edwards et al., Trustees of the School City of Peru,*v. *State, ex rel. Kesling,*143 Ind. 84, and upon the authority of that case tha judgment in this case is affirmed.
#### § 1250.34 Refrigeration equipment.

Each refrigerator shall be equipped with a thermometer located in the warmest portion thereof. Waste water drains from ice boxes, refrigerating equipment, and refrigerated spaces shall be so installed as to prevent backflow of contaminating liquids.
# EUR-Lex - 31991R0273 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31991R0273

**Commission Regulation (EEC) No 273/91 of 1 February 1991 amending Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3447/90 on special conditions for the granting of private storage aid for sheepmeat and goatmeat **

*
Official Journal L 028 , 02/02/1991 P. 0028 - 0028 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 36 P. 0125 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 36 P. 0125 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EEC) No 273/91 of 1 February 1991 amending Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3447/90 on special conditions for the granting of private storage aid for sheepmeat and goatmeat

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 3013/89 of 25 September 1989 on the common organization of the market in sheepmeat and goatmeat (1), as amended by Regulation (EEC) No 3577/90 (2), and in particular Article 7 (5) thereof,

Whereas Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3447/90 (3) of 28 November 1990 lays down special conditions for the granting of private storage aid for sheepmeat and goatmeat whereas it is appropriate to determine the minimum quantity to be destocked; whereas the provisions of this Regulation should therefore be completed;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sheep and Goats,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: Article 1

The following Article 3b is inserted in Regulation (EEC) No 3447/90:

'Article 3b

The minimum quantity for each removal is fixed at four tonnes expressed as bone-in meat per store and per contractor. However, where the quantity left in a store is less than this quantity, one further withdrawal operation of the remaining quantity or part thereof shall be permitted.

Where the withdrawal conditions referred to in the preceding subparagraph are not complied with:

- the amount of aid for the quantity withdrawn shall be calculated in accordance with Article 6 (3) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3446/90 (*), and

- 15 % of the security referred to in Article 4 shall be declared forfeit in respect of the quantity withdrawn.

(*) OJ No L 333, 30. 11. 1990, p. 39.' Article 2 This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities. This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 1 February 1991. For the Commission

Ray MAC SHARRY

Member of the Commission (1) OJ No L 289, 7. 10. 1989, p. 1. (2) OJ No L 353, 17. 12. 1990, p. 23. (3) OJ No L 333, 30. 11. 1990, p. 46.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DOR BioPharma, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








DOR
BIOPHARMA, INC.





November
      14, 2008
            by:
            /s/Christopher J.
SchaberChristopher
      J. Schaber, Ph.D.President
      and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. NOEL DEVON D. COWARD, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 370 EAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 29th day of October, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Howard Schwimmer, Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

| (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| /s/ Howard Schwimmer       |   |   |
|----------------------------|--------|--------|
| Howard Schwimmer           |   |   |
| Co-Chief Executive Officer |   |   |
| October 29, 2015           |   |   |
**Exhibit 23**

 

******Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

The Board of Directors 

MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc.: 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 33-96420, 333-19159, 333-43474, 333-83624, 333-83628, 333-100404, and333-122405) on Form S-8 of MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc. of our reports dated August 10, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc. and subsidiaries (MEMC) as of December 31, 2005 and 2004; therelated consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficiency), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005; the related financial statement schedule; and our report dated August10, 2006, with respect to management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005,which reports appear in the December 31, 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K of MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc. 

 

As discussed in note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has restated the consolidated statements of cash flows for the years endedDecember 31, 2004 and 2003. 

 

Our report dated August 10, 2006on management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005 expresses our opinion that MEMC did not maintaineffective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005 because of the effect of material weaknesses on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria and contains an explanatory paragraph that states MEMC hadineffective Company-level controls, inadequate expertise in U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and inadequate revenue recognition policies and procedures. 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

St. Louis, Missouri 

August 10, 2006
###### Editorial Note on Part 180

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 180 appear at 79 FR 75879, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 180.755 When will I know whether the suspension is continued or terminated?

The suspending official must make a written decision whether to continue, modify, or terminate your suspension within 45 days of closing the official record. The official record closes upon the suspending official's receipt of final submissions, information and findings of fact, if any. The suspending official may extend that period for good cause.