alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED ACCOUNTING FIRM

          We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.333-21489, 333-21491, and 333-11618 on Form S-8 of our report dated April 13,2005 (November 17, 2005, as to the effects of the restatement discussed in Note2), which expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraphrelating to the Company's restatement described in Note 2 to the consolidatedfinancial statements, relating to the consolidated financial statements andfinancial statement schedule as of December 31, 2004 and for each of the yearsin the two-year period then ended of Systemax, Inc. and subsidiaries appearingin the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Systemax Inc. for the year ended December31, 2005.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
#### CROW, Appellant, v. WARNER, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 27, 1914.)

Action by David Crow against H. Dudley Phlippeau, of New York City, for appellant. M. S. Guiterman, of New York City, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs. Order filed.
§ 1.625 What records requirements must an accreditation body that has been recognized meet? ( a ) An accreditation body that has been recognized must maintain electronically for 5 years records created while it is recognized (including documents and data) demonstrating its compliance with this subpart, including records relating to: ( 1 ) Applications for accreditation and renewal of accreditation under § 1.660;
( 2 ) Decisions to grant, deny, suspend, withdraw, or expand or reduce the scope of an accreditation;
( 3 ) Challenges to adverse accreditation decisions under § 1.620(c);
( 4 ) Its monitoring of accredited third-party certification bodies under § 1.621;
( 5 ) Self-assessments and corrective actions under § 1.622;
( 6 ) Regulatory audit reports, including any supporting information, that an accredited third-party certification body may have submitted;
( 7 ) Any reports or notifications to FDA under § 1.623, including any supporting information; and
( 8 ) Records of fee payments and reimbursement of direct costs.
( b ) An accreditation body that has been recognized must make records required by paragraph (a) of this section available for inspection and copying promptly upon written request of an authorized FDA officer or employee at the place of business of the accreditation body or at a reasonably accessible location. If the records required by paragraph (a) of this section are requested by FDA electronically, the records must be submitted to FDA electronically not later than 10 business days after the date of the request. Additionally, if the requested records are maintained in a language other than English, the accreditation body must electronically submit an English translation within a reasonable time.
( c ) An accreditation body that has been recognized must not prevent or interfere with FDA's access to its accredited third-party certification bodies and the accredited third-party certification body records required by § 1.658.
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 937 

To congratulate Fort Collins, Colorado, on being named the best place to 

live in the United States for 2006. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 20, 2006 

Mrs. MUSGRAVE submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

To congratulate Fort Collins, Colorado, on being named the 

best place to live in the United States for 2006. 

Whereas Money magazine named Fort Collins the ‘‘Best 

Place to Live’’ in the United States for 2006; 

Whereas the city of Fort Collins, Colorado, is an example of 

the best aspects of life in the United States; 

Whereas the citizens of Fort Collins enjoy superior educational opportunities, including access to quality higher 

education in Colorado State University, Front Range 

Community College, and Aims Community College, and a 

strong public education system, including the number one 

ranked high school in the State, Ridgeview Classical 

School, a public charter school; 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 937 IH 

Whereas the strong Fort Collins job market is centered on 

the high technology businesses that help to drive a strong 

national economy; 

Whereas the citizens of Fort Collins enjoy easy access to the 

beautiful natural resources of the mountain west, including Horsetooth Reservoir, the Cache la Poudre river valley, and the nearby Rocky Mountain National Park; and 

Whereas the citizens of Fort Collins enjoy the safety and security of a very low crime rate: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives con2 gratulates Fort Collins, Colorado, on being named the best 

3 place to live in the United States for 2006. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
National Assessment of Oil and Gas Assessment of Undisthe Southwestern W

Using a geology-based assessment methodology, 

the U.S. Geological Survey estimated a mean of 

84.6 trillion cubic feet of undiscovered natural gas, a 

mean of 131 million barrels of undiscovered oil, and 

a mean of 2.6 billion barrels of undiscovered natural 

gas liquids in the Southwestern Wyoming Province.

Introduction

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) recently completed an assessment of the undiscovered oil and gas 

potential of the Southwestern Wyoming Province (fig. 1). The USGS Southwestern Wyoming Province for this assessment included the Green River Basin, Moxa arch, Hoback Basin, Sandy Bend arch, Rock Springs uplift, G

Di

id

B

i

W

h

W

h

ki

B

i
Table 1. Southwestern Wyoming Province ass

[MMBO, million barrels of oil; BCFG, billion cubic feet fi elds, all liquids are included under the NGL (natural gdefi ned similarly. Fractiles are additive only under the 

3.80 0.00 1.70 

0.90 0.90 0.90 

To 

tal Petroleum Systems 

(TPS) and Assessment Units (AU)

Fieldtype

Gas

Oil

GasGas

Oil

Gas

Oil

Gas

Oil

GasGas

Conventional Oil and Gas Resources 

 Phosphoria TPS

Sub-Cretaceous ConventionalOil and Gas AUMowry Composite TPSMesaverde TPS

Lewis TPS

Hilliard-Baxter-Mancos TPSMesaverde-Lance-Ft. Union Composite TPSMowry Conventional Oil and Gas AUHilliard-Baxter-MancosConventional Oil and Gas AUMesaverde Conventional Oil and Gas AUMesaverde-Lance-Ft. UnionConventional Oil and Gas AULewis Conventional Oil and Gas AULance-Ft. Union ConventionalOil and Gas AU

Lance-Ft. Union Composite TPS

Table 1. Southwestern Wyoming Province ass[MMBO, million barrels of oil; BCFG, billion cubic feet fi elds, all liquids are included under the NGL (natural gdefi ned similarly. Fractiles are additive only under the
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 889 

Recognizing the commencement of Ramadan, the Muslim holy month of 

fasting and spiritual renewal, and commending Muslims in the United 

States and throughout the world for their faith. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 10, 2018 

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas (for herself, Mr. CARSON of Indiana, 

Mr. ELLISON, Mr. SOTO, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Ms. CLARKE of New York, 

Mr. TAKANO, Mr. KILDEE, Ms. FUDGE, and Mr. LEWIS of Georgia) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the commencement of Ramadan, the Muslim 

holy month of fasting and spiritual renewal, and commending Muslims in the United States and throughout 

the world for their faith. 

Whereas since the terrorist attacks on the United States on 

September 11, 2001, threats and incidents of violence 

have been directed at law-abiding, patriotic Americans of 

African, Arab, and South Asian descent, particularly 

members of the Islamic faith; 

Whereas, on September 14, 2001, the House of Representatives passed a concurrent resolution condemning bigotry 

and violence against Arab-Americans, American Muslims, 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 889 IH 

and Americans from South Asia in the wake of the terrorist attacks; 

Whereas it is estimated that there are approximately 

1,600,000,000 Muslims worldwide; 

Whereas over 3,700 Muslims serve on active duty and over 

1,900 Muslims serve as selected reserve personnel in the 

United States Armed Forces; 

Whereas Ramadan is the holy month of fasting and spiritual 

renewal for Muslims worldwide, and is the 9th month of 

the Muslim calendar year; and 

Whereas the observance of the Muslim holy month of Ramadan commences at dusk on May 15, 2018, and continues 

for one lunar month: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That— 

2 (1) during this time of conflict, in order to 

3 demonstrate solidarity with and support for mem4 bers of the community of Islam in the United States 

5 and throughout the world, the House of Representa6 tives recognizes the Islamic faith as one of the great 

7 religions of the world; and 

8 (2) in observance of and out of respect for the 

9 commencement of Ramadan, the Muslim holy month 

10 of fasting and spiritual renewal, the House of Rep11 resentatives acknowledges the onset of Ramadan and 

12 expresses its deepest respect to Muslims in the 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 889 IH 

1 United States and throughout the world on this sig2 nificant occasion. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
AAM-12-182-E 

February 2, 2012 

 Exemption No. 10440 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2012-0069 

Mr. John C. Kline 

Manager 

Falcon Aviation LLC 

5220 West US Highway 20 

Angola, IN 46703 

Dear Mr. Kline: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By submission dated January 18, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration 

(FAA) on behalf of Falcon Aviation LLC (Falcon Aviation) for an exemption from 

part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow 

Falcon Aviation, which is operating under separate parts of 14 CFR, to cover its safetysensitive employees under one testing program. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Falcon Aviation. 

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 

operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into one 

would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that 

provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden 

the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs. 
2 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant 

of Exemption No. 9703; 

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 

also apply to the situation you present; and 

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant Falcon Aviation LLC an exemption from part 120 to the 

extent necessary to allow Falcon Aviation, which is operating under separate parts of the 

regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program, subject to the 

conditions and limitations described below. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of Falcon Aviation are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all 

times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91. 

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of 

the Falcon Aviation part 135 operation, not under part 91. 

This exemption terminates on February 28, 2014 unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely,

/s/ 

James R. Fraser, M.D. 

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon 

Enclosure
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear at 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

#### § 117.325 Public disclosure.

Records obtained by FDA in accordance with this part are subject to the disclosure requirements under part 20 of this chapter.
#### LEWIS, Respondent, v. BERRY, Appellant, et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

July 31, 1914.)

Action by Nelson P. Lewis against Frank D. Berry, impleaded with others.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
#### § 1132.2 Applicability of this part.

The types of awards and entities to which this part and other parts in this subchapter apply are described in the subchapter overview at 2 CFR 1126.2.
#### § 1400.1011 The DOI Debarment Program Director.

The Debarment Program Director is the individual in PAM who advises the Suspending and Debarring Official on DOI suspension and debarment practices and procedures, manages the suspension and debarment process, and acts as the DOI suspension and debarment program fact-finding official.

[81 FR 65857, Sept. 26, 2016]
#### WARD, Respondent, v. T. HOGAN & SONS, Inc., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

July 31, 1914.)

Action by Patrick Ward against T. Hogan & Sons, Incorporated.

No opinion. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. See, also, 159 App. Div. 490, 144 N. Y. Supp. 514.
§ 2700.890 How may I appeal my debarment? ( a ) If the SBA debarring official issues a decision under § 180.870 to debar you after you present information in opposition to a proposed debarment under § 180.815, you may ask for review of the debarring official's decision in two ways: ( 1 ) You may ask the debarring official to reconsider the decision for material errors of fact or law that you believe will change the outcome of the matter; or
( 2 ) You may request that the SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) review the debarring official's decision to debar you within 30 days of your receipt of the debarring official's decision under § 180.870 or paragraph (a)(1) of this section. However, OHA may reverse the debarring official's decision only where OHA finds that the decision is based on a clear error of material fact or law, or where OHA finds that the debarring official's decision was arbitrary, capricious, or an abuse of discretion. You may appeal the debarring official's decision without requesting reconsideration, or you may appeal the decision of the debarring official on reconsideration. The procedures governing OHA appeals are set forth in 13 CFR part 134.
( b ) A request for review under this section must be in writing; state the specific findings you believe to be in error; and include the reasons or legal bases for your position.
( c ) OHA, in its discretion, may stay the debarment pending review of the debarring official's decision.
( d ) The SBA debarring official and OHA must notify you of their decision under this section, in writing, using the notice procedures set forth at §§ 180.615 and 180.975.
#### CHARLES H. WERNER & SONS CO. *v.*LEWIS.

Justices of the Peace — Judgment on Note — Sufficiency.

In justice’s court, under the statute (section 826, 1 Comp. Laws), the production and presentation in evidence of a promissory note is sufficient to support a judgment for its amount, in the absence of a denial under oath of the execution thereof at the time of pleading.

Case made from Charlevoix; Mayne, J.

Submitted January 18, 1909.

(Docket No. 95.)

Decided February 2, 1909.

Assumpsit by Charles H. Werner & Sons Company against William J. Lewis for the amount of a judgment obtained in justice’s court. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

*Knowles & Converse,*for appellant.

*B. W. Kane,*for appellee.

Grant, J.

Plaintiff brought suit in assumpsit in justice’s court against the defendant. Summons was returned personally served. Defendant did not appear. *451Plaintiff filed *a,*declaration upon the common counts in assumpsit, and “especially upon a certain promissory note given by the above-named defendant to the above-named plaintiff, under date of November 26, 1895, for $45.89, due in six months, at 7 per cent, interest, and files the note with the court.” After waiting one hour the court rendered judgment for the plaintiff for the amount of the note. This suit is brought upon that judgment.

Defendant objected to the admission of the judgment, because the justice’s docket does not show that evidence was given; that no witnesses were sworn, as required by subdivision 8, § 957, 1 Comp. Laws, which requires the justice to enter upon his docket, among other things, “the names of the witnesses sworn at the request of either party, stating at whose request, the objections, if any, made to the competency of a witness, and the decision thereon.” No evidence was required, further than the production and presentation of the note, under section 826, 1 Comp. Laws, which provides that any written instrument declared upon may be used in evidence upon the trial without proving its execution, unless its execution is denied upon oath at the time of pleading. There was no necessity for the swearing of any witnesses. The case is ruled against the defendant by *O’Donnell*v. *Wade,*151 Mich. 103.

The judgment is affirmed.

Blair, C. J., and Montgomery, Hooker, and Moore, JJ., concurred.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 822 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 822

 Expressing support for the designation of April 12, 2018, as ``Reman 
                                 Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 12, 2018

 Mr. Kelly of Mississippi (for himself, Mr. Lipinski, Mr. Cramer, and 
   Mr. Hollingsworth) submitted the following resolution; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing support for the designation of April 12, 2018, as ``Reman 
                                 Day''.

Whereas remanufacturing is a comprehensive and rigorous industrial process by 
        which a previously sold, leased, used, worn, or nonfunctional product or 
        part is returned to a ``same-as-when-new'' or better condition, from 
        both a quality and performance perspective, through a controlled, 
        reproducible, and sustainable process;
Whereas remanufacturing has been recognized by leading universities, research 
        institutions, and manufacturers around the world as the highest form of 
        recycling, by reducing greenhouse gas production, saving energy, and 
        reclaiming end-of-life products;
Whereas by encouraging businesses, State agencies, nonprofit organizations, 
        schools, and individuals to celebrate Reman Day, 2018, we can further 
        promote remanufacturing as environmentally friendly and economically 
        efficient; and
Whereas, to focus the Nation's attention on the benefits of remanufacturing, 
        businesses, educational institutions, and nonprofit organizations have 
        joined together to celebrate Reman Day and are encouraging colleagues, 
        friends, families, and communities to learn more about the benefits of 
        remanufactured products: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports the 
designation of ``Reman Day''.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1261

KARON ANN PARHAM,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PEPSICO, INCORPORATED,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-95-307-5-BR)

Submitted: August 25, 1998 Decided: November 23, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Karon Ann Parham, Appellant Pro Se. Louis B. Meyer, III, POYNER &

SPRUILL, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Karon Ann Parham appeals the district court’s orders denying

her motions to accept newly discovered evidence and for entry of

default judgment. We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s orders and find no reversible error. We affirm the denial

of Parham’s motions because the motion to accept newly discovered

evidence was untimely under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), and the district

court lacked jurisdiction to reopen default judgment proceedings

after entering final judgment. We deny Parham’s motion for oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. We deny Parham’s motions for sanctions,

to produce evidence, and command attendance at hearing. We grant

Pepsico’s second amended motion for sanctions under Fed. R. App. P.

38 for filing a frivolous appeal, but decline to grant Pepsico’s

request for an order enjoining Parham from filing any future

actions against Pepsico in federal court. Instead of particularized

fees and costs, we order Parham to pay sanctions in the amount of

$500. See In re Vincent, 105 F.3d 943, 945 (4th Cir. 1997).

AFFIRMED
#### § 2900.11 Revision of budget and program plans including extension of the period of performance.

In addition to the guidance set forth in 2 CFR 200.308(b), for Federal awards from the Department of Labor, the non-Federal entity must request prior approval for an extension to the period of performance.

[86 FR 22108, Apr. 27, 2021]
2007-1452.

#### Sogg v. Ohio Dept. of Commerce.

Franklin App. No. 06AP-883, 2007-Ohio-3219.

Lanzinger, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. II and III only.
CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlantis Technology Group (the
      "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I
      Christopher M. Dubeau, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer,
      Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      September 9, 2008





By:Christopher
                M. Dubeau, Chief Executive Officer
              and
                Principal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting
                Officer