alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 31993D0724 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31993D0724

**93/724/EC: Council Decision of 23 November 1993 concerning the conclusion of an Agreement between the European Community and Republic of Hungary on the reciprocal protection and control of wine names **

*
Official Journal L 337 , 31/12/1993 P. 0093 - 0093 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 55 P. 0013 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 55 P. 0013 *

COUNCIL DECISION of 23 November 1993 concerning the conclusion of an Agreement between the European Community and Republic of Hungary on the reciprocal protection and control of wine names (93/724/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 113 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Whereas the Agreement negotiated between the European Community and the Republic of Hungary on the reciprocal protection and control of wine names will help make measures to eliminate unfair competition in trade more effective, ensure a greater degree of consumer protection and promote trade in wine between the Contracting Parties; whereas it is therefore desirable to approve the said Agreement;

Whereas, in order to facilitate the implementation of certain provisions of the Agreement, the Commission should be authorized to make the necessary technical adjustments in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 83 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 822/87 of 16 March 1987 on the common organization of the market in wine (1);

Whereas, since the provisions of the Agreement are directly linked to measures covered by the common commercial and agricultural policy, the said Agreement must be established at Community level,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Hungary on the reciprocal protection and control of wine names, the Protocol, exchanges of letters and declarations annexed thereto are hereby approved on behalf of the Community.

The text of the acts referred to in the first paragraph are attached to this Decision.

Article 2

The President of the Council is hereby authorized to designate the person empowered to sign the Agreement and to deposit the instrument of approval by the Community.

The President of the Council shall make the notification provided for in Article 19 (1) of the Agreement.

Article 3

For the purposes of Article 13 of the Agreement, the Commission is hereby authorized to conclude the necessary acts amending the Agreement, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 83 of Regulation (EEC) No 822/87.

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

Done at Brussels, 23 November 1993.

For the Council The President M. SMET

(1) OJ No L 84, 27. 3. 1987, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1566/93 (OJ No L 154, 25. 6. 1993, p. 39).
§ 900.7 Standard and project-specific schedules. ( a ) DOE shall publish, and update from time to time, a standard schedule that identifies the steps generally needed to complete decisions on all Federal environmental reviews and authorizations for a proposed electric transmission project. The standard schedule will include recommended timing for each step so as to allow final decisions on all Federal authorizations within two years of the publication of a notice of intent to prepare an environmental review document under § 900.9 or as soon as practicable thereafter, considering the requirements of relevant Federal laws, and the need for robust analysis of proposed project impacts, early and meaningful consultation with potentially affected Indian Tribes and engagement with stakeholders and communities of interest.
( b ) During the Integrated Interagency Pre-Application (IIP) Process, DOE, in coordination with any NEPA joint lead agency and relevant Federal entities, shall prepare a project-specific schedule that is informed by the standard schedule prepared under paragraph (a) of this section and that establishes prompt and binding intermediate milestones and ultimate deadlines for the review of, and Federal authorization decisions relating to, a proposed electric transmission project, accounting for relevant statutory requirements, the potential route, reasonable alternative potential routes, if any, the need to assess and address any impacts to military testing, training, and operations, and other factors particular to the specific proposed project, including the need for early and meaningful consultation with potentially affected Indian Tribes and engagement with stakeholders and communities of interest. DOE may revise the project-specific schedule as needed to satisfy applicable statutory requirements, allow for engagement with stakeholders and communities of interest, and account for delays caused by the actions or inactions of the project proponent.
|   | (a) | the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period Ended June 30, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (b) | the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of such period and the results of operations of the Company for such period. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ Steven N. Bronson        |
|--------|------------------------------|
|   | Steven N. Bronson, President |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                 MAY-31-1999
<CASH>                                                65
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      65
<PP&E>                                                 0
<DEPRECIATION>                                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    46,620
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            156,384
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            1
<COMMON>                                           2,643
<OTHER-SE>                                             0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      46,620
<SALES>                                        4,225,317
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               4,225,317
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  4,536,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (313,283)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     114,889
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    0
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (196,394)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.07)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Mary Merritt, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of SBH ASSOCIATES, INC. (the "Company"), certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of SBH ASSOCIATES, INC.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and  5. I, as the certifying officer have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  Date: April 27, 2015 By: /s/ MARY MERRITT Mary Merritt Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
#### § 2900.9 Revision of budget and program plans.

In the DOL, approval of the budget as awarded does not constitute prior approval of those items requiring prior approval, including those items the Federal awarding agency specifies as requiring prior approval (see 2 CFR 200.407 and 2 CFR 200.308(a)).

[86 FR 22108, Apr. 27, 2021]
CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Young Ju Yi, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Kore Resources Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: (i)the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company, for the period  ended September 30, 2013 and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  By:/s/Young Ju YiName:Young Ju YiTitle:Chief Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial OfficerDate:April 15, 2013 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
#### § 200.202 Program planning and design.

The Federal awarding agency must design a program and create an Assistance Listing before announcing the Notice of Funding Opportunity. The program must be designed with clear goals and objectives that facilitate the delivery of meaningful results consistent with the Federal authorizing legislation of the program. Program performance shall be measured based on the goals and objectives developed during program planning and design. See § 200.301 for more information on performance measurement. Performance measures may differ depending on the type of program. The program must align with the strategic goals and objectives within the Federal awarding agency's performance plan and should support the Federal awarding agency's performance measurement, management, and reporting as required by Part 6 of OMB Circular A-11 (Preparation, Submission, and Execution of the Budget). The program must also be designed to align with the Program Management Improvement Accountability Act (Pub. L. 114-264).
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 1 (Monday, January 3, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 175-176]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-33048]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-70,851; TA-W-70,851A]


Kennametal, Inc., Irwin, PA; Kennametal, Inc., Including On-Site 
Leased Workers of Spherion Staffing Services, Bedford, PA; Amended 
Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment 
Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(``Act''), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a 
Certification of Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance 
on March 25, 2010, applicable to workers and former workers of 
Kennametal, Inc., Irwin, Pennsylvania (subject firm). The Department's 
Notice of Determination was published in the Federal Register on April 
23, 2010 (75 FR 21354). The subject workers were engaged in

[[Page 176]]

activities related to the production of tungsten carbide performs and 
armor piercing products.
    Information obtained by the Department revealed that the 
appropriate subdivision covered by the certification includes an 
auxiliary facility producing carbide tips.
    Based on these findings, the Department is amending this 
certification to include workers of Kennametal, Inc., Bedford, 
Pennsylvania, including on-site leased workers of Spherion Staffing 
Services.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-70,851 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Kennametal, Inc., Irwin, Pennsylvania (TA-W-
70,851) and Kennametal, Inc., including on-site leased workers from 
Spherion Staffing Services, Bedford, Pennsylvania (TA-W-70,851A), 
who became totally or partially separated from employment on or 
after May 28, 2008, through March 25, 2012, and all workers in the 
group threatened with total or partial separation from employment on 
the date of certification through two years from the date of 
certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under 
Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 14th day of December 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-33048 Filed 12-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             525
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  455,754
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    255,204
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               723,040
<PP&E>                                         521,566
<DEPRECIATION>                                 360,782
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 894,207
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          625,578
<BONDS>                                        240,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        45,816
<OTHER-SE>                                   (108,969)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   894,207
<SALES>                                      2,032,998
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,032,998
<CGS>                                        1,181,231
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,181,231
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 78,443
<INCOME-TAX>                                    15,689
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    78,443
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Pedro Luis Corchado, Appellant.

Greenblott, J.

Appeal from an order of the County Court of Sullivan County, entered October 11, 1968, which denied, after a hearing, defendant’s application in the nature of a writ of error *coram nobis*to vacate a judgment of said court rendered February 9, 1959. Respondent, having been indicted for murder in the first degree, was permitted to plead guilty to a reduced charge of murder in the second degree, and was sentenced to 30 years to life. He now contends that the publicity attending his prosecution prevented him from receiving a fair trial, and was in violation of his rights under the due process clause. His position is that there was a continuous bombardment by the news media of facts and comments concerning the crime, resulting in the creation of an atmosphere in Sullivan ¡County which made a fair and impartial trial impossible, and that the sole reason he entered a plea of guilty to murder in the second degree was that the publicity made it imp os*1046sible for him to obtain an acquittal at the hands of a Sullivan County jury. At the hearing in Sullivan County Court, the two attorneys who represented appellant from the time of arraignment to sentence testified that the adverse publicity was not a prime concern in their recommendation to appellant that he plead guilty. Instead they stated that it was the facts which the prosecution could produce and the nature of the crime which induced their conclusion that appellant would he well advised to plead guilty to a reduced charge, since he was faced with the death penalty in the event of conviction of murder in the first degree. We find it significant that appellant’s attorneys never considered that the effect of the publicity was such that a motion for a change of venue was indicated. (See *Stroble*v. *California,*343 U. S. 181.) An examination of the newspaper articles which were admitted in evidence at the hearing, reveals factual accounts of a very brutal crime, where an elderly woman was raped and killed, as well as routine recital of the various court proceedings which followed the arrest of the defendant. Order affirmed. Herlihy, P. J., Reynolds, Staley, Jr., Greenblott and Sweeney, JJ., concur in memorandum by Greenblott, J.
§ 1.636 How do I request reinstatement of recognition? ( a ) *Application following revocation.* An accreditation body that has had its recognition revoked may seek reinstatement by submitting a new application for recognition under § 1.630. The accreditation body must submit evidence that the grounds for revocation have been resolved, including evidence addressing the cause or conditions that were the basis for revocation and identifying measures that have been implemented to help ensure that such cause(s) or condition(s) are unlikely to recur.
( b ) *Application following relinquishment.* An accreditation body that previously relinquished its recognition under § 1.635 may seek recognition by submitting a new application for recognition under § 1.630.
#### § 11.70 Signature/record linking.

Electronic signatures and handwritten signatures executed to electronic records shall be linked to their respective electronic records to ensure that the signatures cannot be excised, copied, or otherwise transferred to falsify an electronic record by ordinary means.
All data has been removed from this file as a result of CBI sanitization. All data used to develop the chemical precipitation operating labor cost f actors is considered CBI or CBI deducible.
#### In Re State ex rel. Wynn.

[No. 17,079.

Filed April 30, 1943.]

*341
      *S. Lloyd Garrison*and *Worth H. Castor,*both of Noblesville, for appellant.

*George N. Beamer,*Attorney General, *James K. Northam,*First Assistant Attorney General, and *Robert E. Agnew,*Deputy Attorney General, for the State.

Royse, J. —

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Hamilton Circuit Court acting as the Juvenile Court of said County, pursuant to the Acts of the General Assembly of the State of Indiana, Acts 1941, ch. 233, p. 902, § 1, §§ 9-2829 — 9-2861, Burns’ 1942 Replacement, in which the court found that the appellant had habitually so conducted herself as to injure and endanger the morals and health of herself; that she is now sixteen (16) years of age, and that it is to the best interest of said appellant that she be placed in the care and custody of the Indiana Girls’ School at Clermont until she is twenty-one (21) years of age.

The assignment of errors in this court is as follows: (1) The trial court did not have jurisdiction of the person of the appellant; (2) the court erred in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial; (3) the trial-court *342did not have jurisdiction of the subject-matter of the action.

This assignment of errors presents no question to this court. The only assignment of error permitted is “that the decision of the juvenile court is contrary to law ...” § 9-2858, Burns’ 1933 (Supp.); *Alvey*v. *State*(1936), 101 Ind. App. 391, 199 N. E. 432; *Garrison*v. *State*(1929), 88 Ind. App. 445, 164 N. E. 508; *Cline*v. *State*(1923), 80 Ind. App. 251, 135 N. E. 159; *Heber et al.*v. *Drake et al.*(1918), 68 Ind. App. 448, 118 N. E. 864; *Parker*v. *State*(1917), 63 Ind. App. 671, 113 N. E. 763*; Eddy*v. *State*(1913), 54 Ind. App. 93, 102 N. E. 277; *Spade*v. *State*(1909), 44 Ind. App. 529, 533, 89 N. E. 604.

No question being presented to this court, the judgment of the Hamilton Juvenile Court is affirmed.

Note. — Reported in 48 N. E. (2d) 63.