alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 31987D0440 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31987D0440

**87/440/EEC: Commission Decision of 29 July 1987 amending Decision 87/119/EEC as regards the list of establishments in Brazil approved for the purpose of importing meat products into the Community **

*
Official Journal L 238 , 21/08/1987 P. 0039 - 0039 *

*****

COMMISSION DECISION

of 29 July 1987

amending Decision 87/119/EEC as regards the list of establishments in Brazil approved for the purpose of importing meat products into the Community

(87/440/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 77/99/EEC of 21 December 1976 on health problems affecting intra-Community trade in meat products (1), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 3768/85 (2), and in particular Article 17 (1) thereof,

Whereas a list of establishments in Brazil, approved for the purpose of importing meat products into the Community, was drawn up initially by Commission Decision 87/119/EEC (3), as last amended by Decision 87/261/EEC (4);

Whereas a Community on-the-spot visit to meat product establishments in Brazil has revealed that the level of hygiene in one establishment was altered since the last inspection; whereas the list of establishments should be amended accordingly;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Annex to Decision 87/119/EEC is hereby replaced by the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 July 1987.

For the Commission

Frans ANDRIESSEN

Vice-President

(1) OJ No L 26, 31. 12. 1977, p. 85.

(2) OJ No L 362, 31. 12. 1985, p. 8.

(3) OJ No L 49, 18. 2. 1987, p. 37.

(4) OJ No L 123, 12. 5. 1987, p. 10.

ANNEX

LIST OF ESTABLISHMENTS

1.2.3 // // // // Approval No // Establishment // Address // // // // SIF 7 // Swift Armour SA Indústria e Comércio // Santana do Livramento, Rio Grande do Sul // SIF 10 // Frigorífico Bordon SA // São Paulo, São Paulo // SIF 34 // Swift Armour SA // S. André, São Paulo // SIF 76 // SA Frigorífico Anglo // Barretos, São Paulo // SIF 381 // Frigorífico Kaiowa SA // Guarulhos, São Paulo // SIF 385 // Frigorífico Mouran SA // Andradina, São Paulo // SIF 736 // Sola SA Indústrias Alimentícias // Três Rios, Rio de Janeiro // SIF 1676 // Swift Armour SA Indústria e Comércio // Uberlândia, Minas Gerais // SIF 2015 // Sadia Oeste SA Indústria e Comércio // Várzea Grande, Mato Grosso // SIF 2023 // Frigorífico Quatro Rios SA // Votuporanga, São Paulo // // //
#### § 95.55 Continued applicability of the regulations in this part.

The suspension, revocation or other termination of access authorization or the termination of facility clearance does not relieve any person from compliance with the regulations in this part.

[62 FR 17698, Apr. 11, 1997]
H. Res. 911

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

July 19, 2006.

Whereas on July 11, 2006, during evening rush hour, seven 

major explosions occurred on busy urban commuter 

trains in the Indian financial capital of Mumbai, killing 

as many as 200 and wounding more than 700 innocent 

civilians; 

Whereas the Mumbai attacks occurred shortly after a series 

of grenade attacks took the lives of at least eight people 

and injured approximately 40 others in tourist areas of 

Srinagar, Kashmir; 

Whereas India has been a strong partner of the United 

States in the Global War on Terror and offered immediate assistance to the United States after the terrorist 

attacks of September 11, 2001; 

Whereas the United States and India are both multicultural, 

multireligious democracies that oppose terrorism in all its 

forms and will continue to work steadfastly to overcome 

terrorist ideology and establish international peace and 

security; 

Whereas the bombings have been condemned by leaders from 

around the world, including from those attending the 

Group of Eight (G–8) meeting in Saint Petersburg, Russia; and 
2

•HRES 911 EH 

Whereas the United States stands with the people and the 

Government of India and condemns in the strongest 

terms these atrocities, which were committed against innocent people as they went about their daily lives: Now, 

therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) condemns in the strongest possible terms 

3 the July 11, 2006, terrorist attacks in Mumbai and 

4 Srinagar; 

5 (2) expresses its deepest condolences to the 

6 families and friends of those individuals killed in the 

7 attacks and expresses its sympathies to those indi8 viduals who have been injured; 

9 (3) expresses its solidarity with the Government 

10 and people of India in fighting and defeating ter11 rorism in all its forms; and 

12 (4) expresses its support for the enhancement 

13 of relations between the United States and India, 

14 with the goal of combating terrorism and advancing 

15 international peace and security. 

Attest:

Clerk.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-50766

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JAVIER CABRERA MOYA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 5:11-CR-406-1

Before KING, CLEMENT, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Javier Cabrera Moya

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th

Cir. 2011). Cabrera Moya has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s

brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with

counsel’s assessmentthat the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate

review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 12, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 12-50766 Document: 00512206963 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/12/2013
No. 12-50766

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 12-50766 Document: 00512206963 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/12/2013
# EUR-Lex - 31993D0317 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31993D0317

**93/317/EEC: Commission Decision of 21 April 1993 concerning the content of the code to be used on bovine ear marks **

*
Official Journal L 122 , 18/05/1993 P. 0045 - 0045 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 49 P. 0215 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 49 P. 0215 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 21 April 1993 concerning the content of the code to be used on bovine ear marks

(93/317/EEC)THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 92/102/EEC of 27 November 1992 on the identification and registration of animals (1), and in particular Article 5 (2) (a) thereof,

Whereas this code must provide for each bovine animal to be identified individually and for its Member State and holding of origin to be identified; whereas a two-letter code should be used to identify each Member State;

Whereas the holding of origin may be identifed by a number or a series of numbers unique to each holding; whereas each competent authority must choose the numbering system for holdings under its control; whereas the code must be completed by numbers or letters identifying the individual animal;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

1. The code on a bovine ear mark shall start with the letters identifying the Member State of origin in accordance with the following table:

/* Tables: see OJ */

2. The code shall be completed by a series of numbres and/or letters which make it possible to identify each animal individually along with the holding on which it was born.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 21 April 1993.

For the Commission

René STEICHEN

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 355, 5. 12. 1992, p. 32.
# EUR-Lex - 31988R0775 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31988R0775

**Commission Regulation (EEC) No 775/88 of 24 March 1988 correcting Regulation (EEC) No 3143/85 on the sale at reduced prices of intervention butter intended for direct consumption in the form of concentrated butter **

*
Official Journal L 080 , 25/03/1988 P. 0031 - 0031 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 26 P. 0119 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 26 P. 0119 *

*****

COMMISSION REGULATION (EEC) No 775/88

of 24 March 1988

correcting Regulation (EEC) No 3143/85 on the sale at reduced prices of intervention butter intended for direct consumption in the form of concentrated butter

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 804/68 of 27 June 1968 on the common organization of the market in milk and milk products (1), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 744/88 (2), and in particular Article 6 (7) thereof,

Whereas Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3143/85 (3), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1807/87 (4), introduces arrangements for the sale at reduced prices of intervention butter intended for direct consumption in the form of concentrated butter; whereas, as a result of the latest amendment, the second subparagraph of Article 2 (4) has been replaced; whereas, contrary to the Management Committee's intention, the result was a text without the derogation introduced by Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1325/86 (5); whereas it is accordingly necessary to correct the said Article and to reinsert therein the provision in question with retroactive effect as from the date of entry into force of Regulation (EEC) No 1807/87;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The following third subparagraph is hereby inserted in Article 2 (4) of Regulation (EEC) No 3143/85:

'However, following agreement by the agency responsible, all of the concentrated butter may be packaged for marketing in an establishment other than that stated in the contract of sale.'

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

It shall apply with effect from 30 June 1987.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 24 March 1988.

For the Commission

Frans ANDRIESSEN

Vice-President

(1) OJ No L 148, 28. 6. 1968, p. 13.

(2) OJ No L 78, 23. 3. 1988, p. 1.

(3) OJ No L 298, 12. 11. 1985, p. 9.

(4) OJ No L 170, 30. 6. 1987, p. 20.

(5) OJ No L 117, 6. 5. 1986, p. 14.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Calgon Carbon Corporation (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, John S. Stanik, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operations of theCompany for the periods presented therein.

| /s/ John S.   Stanik    |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                         |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |
| December 13,   2006     |   |

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

----
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-12-000079529-NOV-201212:19 PM
IV 

House Calendar No. 67 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 468 

[Report No. 115–252] 

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 111) providing 

for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States 

Code, of the rule submitted by Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection 

relating to ‘‘Arbitration Agreements’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 24, 2017 

Mr. BUCK, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 

111) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted 

by Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating 

to ‘‘Arbitration Agreements’’. 

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it 

2 shall be in order to consider in the House the joint resolu3 tion (H.J. Res. 111) providing for congressional dis4 approval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, 

5 of the rule submitted by Bureau of Consumer Financial 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 468 RH 

1 Protection relating to ‘‘Arbitration Agreements’’. All 

2 points of order against consideration of the joint resolu3 tion are waived. The joint resolution shall be considered 

4 as read. All points of order against provisions in the joint 

5 resolution are waived. The previous question shall be con6 sidered as ordered on the joint resolution and on any 

7 amendment thereto to final passage without intervening 

8 motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and 

9 controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of 

10 the Committee on Financial Services; and (2) one motion 

11 to recommit. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS

lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 67 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 468 

[Report No. 115–252] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution 

tration Agreements’’. Consumer Financial Protection relating to ‘‘ArbiStates Code, of the rule submitted by Bureau of approval under chapter 8 of title 5, United (H.J. Res. 111) providing for congressional disJULY 24, 2017 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
#### PEOPLE ex rel. EVARTS et al. v. MUNICIPAL COURT, ETC., et al. (two cases).

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 5, 1914.)

Proceedings by the People of the State of New York, on the relation of Allen W. Evarts and others, against the Municipal Court, etc., and others.

No opinion. Motion granted. Settle order on notice. See, also, 147 N. Y. Supp. 615.
#### § 1130.300 Purpose of PROP Article III.

PROP Article III specifies requirements for recipients' use and disposition of real property acquired or improved under an award. It thereby implements OMB guidance in 2 CFR 200.311(b) and (c).
§ 182.500 How are violations of this part determined for recipients other than individuals? A recipient other than an individual is in violation of the requirements of this part if the agency head or his or her designee determines, in writing, that— ( a ) The recipient has violated the requirements of subpart B of this part; or
( b ) The number of convictions of the recipient's employees for violating criminal drug statutes in the workplace is large enough to indicate that the recipient has failed to make a good faith effort to provide a drug-free workplace.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

February 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

127667 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver (47) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, COLLETTE BIELAT, and EDWARD Justices 

BIELAT, 

Plaintiffs, 

and 

CALVIN JENNETTE, and WIESLAWA 

JENNETT,
 Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

v SC: 127667 

 COA: 249147 

Macomb CC: 1984-000612-AA 

SOUTH MACOMB DISPOSAL 

AUTHORITY, 

Defendant-Appellant, 

and 

MACOMB TOWNSHIP,

 Defendant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's order of 

October 14, 2005 is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the 

order was entered erroneously. 

l0221 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

February 27, 2006 

Clerk
Record of Discussion

Docket No. FAA - 2012 - 1228 Directorate Identifier: 2012 - NM - 190 - AD **With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)?**  ORGANIZATION PERSON C ONTACTED DATE RESPONSE refer to AD 2012 - 15 - 15

Other/Addi tional Information:
§ 765.12 Inflation index adjustment procedures. ( a ) The amounts of $6.25 (as specified in § 765.2(e) of this rule) $350 million (as specified in § 765.2(f) of this rule), $365 million (as specified in § 765.2(g) of this rule) and $715 million (as specified in § 765.2(i) of this rule) shall be adjusted for inflation as provided by this section.
( b ) To make adjustments for inflation to the amounts specified in paragraph (a) of this section, the Department shall apply the CPI-U to these amounts annually, beginning in 1994, using the CPI-U as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics within the Department of Commerce for the preceding calendar year.
( c ) The Department shall adjust annually, using the CPI-U as defined in this part, amounts paid to an active uranium processing site licensee for purposes of comparison with the $6.25 per dry short ton limit on reimbursement as adjusted for inflation.
[59 FR 26726, May 23, 1994, as amended at 68 FR 32957, June 3, 2003]
§ 1108.390 Total value. *Total value* of a DoD grant, cooperative agreement, or TIA means the total amount of costs that are currently expected to be charged to the award over its life, which includes amounts for: ( a ) The Federal share and any non-Federal cost sharing or matching required under the award; and
( b ) Any options, even if not yet exercised, for which the costs have been established in the award.
### Herbicides in Midwestern Reservoir Outflows, 1992-93

By: John K. StamerWilliam A. Battaglin**Donald A. Goolsby

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/fs13498

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available. 

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### § 850.4 Enforcement.

DOE may take appropriate steps pursuant to part 851 of this chapter to enforce compliance by contractors with this part and any DOE-approved CBDPP.

[71 FR 6931, Feb. 9, 2006]
User Name: Ann Lyons

Date and Time: 06/09/2014 2:11 PM EDT Job Number: 10521625 Document(1) 1. Michigan v. EPA, 2001 U.S. LEXIS 2911 Client/Matter: -None-

| About LexisNexis | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Copyright © 2014 | LexisNexis
. Ann LyonsNeutral

As of: June 9, 2014 2:11 PM EDT


### Michigan v. EPA Supreme Court of the United States April 16, 2001, Decided 00-746 Reporter: 2001 U.S. LEXIS 2911; 532 U.S. 970; 121 S. Ct. 1600; 149 L. Ed. 2d 467; 69 U.S.L.W. 3670; 52 ERC (BNA) 1480 MICHIGAN, ET AL. v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, ET AL. Prior History: [*1] Reported below: 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 8917

. Judges: Rehnquist, Stevens, O’Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer. Opinion Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Ann Lyons
IV 

House Calendar No. 143 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 654 

[Report No. 109–367] 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 

consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 31, 2006 

Mrs. CAPITO, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with 

respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported 

from the Committee on Rules. 

1 Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule 

2 XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the 

3 Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to 

4 the House is waived with respect to any resolution re5 ported on the legislative day of February 1, 2006, pro6 viding for consideration or disposition of a bill to extend 
2 

HRES 654 RH 

1 and modify authorities needed to combat terrorism, and 

2 for other purposes. 

House Calendar No. 143 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 654 

[Report No. 109–367] 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII 

tions reported from the Committee on Rules. with respect to consideration of certain resoluJANUARY 31, 2006 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed
#### PEOPLE ex rel. SCHULTZE v. FEINBERG et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

July 10, 1914.)

Proceeding by the People of the State of New York, on the relation of Otto H. Schultze, against Israel L. Feinberg and others.

No opinion. Application for writ of certiorari granted. Application for stay of execution pending certiorari denied. Settle order on notice. See, also, 147 N. Y. Supp. 1135.
#### § 905.31 Term.

Western will extend resource commitments for 20 years from the date existing contracts expire to existing customers with long-term firm power contracts from projects identified in section 905.30(b).
#### § 417.210 Which nonprocurement transactions are covered transactions?

All nonprocurement transactions, as defined in § 417.970, are covered transactions unless listed in § 417.215.