alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 34.1**

 

(logo) pwc

  

**Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

** **

To the Board of Directors, PNC FinancialServices Group, Inc.:

 

We have examined management’s assertion, included in theaccompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that Midland Loan Services, a division ofPNC Bank, National Association (“Midland” or the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forthin Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for all transactions serviced on the *Enterprise!*LoanManagement System (the “Platform”), as of December 31, 2015 and for the year then ended, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii),1122(d)(3)(i)(B), 1122(d)(3)(i)(C), 1122(d)(3)(i)(D), 1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), whichthe Company has determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Managementis responsible for the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’sassertion based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestationstandards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis,evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considerednecessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprisethe Platform, testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed thoseselected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedureswere limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report.Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to ourtests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report.We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determinationon the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that Midland compliedwith the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015 for the Platform is fairlystated, in all material respects.

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

February 25, 2016

 

*PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 1100Walnut Street, Suite 1300, Kansas City, MO 64106*

*T: (816) 472 7921, F: (816) 2181890 www.pwc.com/us*
IB 

House Calendar No. 115 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 542 

[Report No. 109–281] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4241) to provide for reconciliation 

pursuant to section 201(a) of the concurrent resolution on the budget 

for fiscal year 2006. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 9, 2005 

Mr. PUTNAM, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4241) to provide 

for reconciliation pursuant to section 201(a) of the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2006. 

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution 

2 it shall be in order without intervention of any point of 

3 order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 4241) to 

4 provide for reconciliation pursuant to section 201(a) of the 

5 concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2006. 

6 The bill shall be considered as read. The amendment 

7 printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accom-
2 

HRES 542 RH 

1 panying this resolution shall be considered as adopted. All 

2 points of order against provisions in the bill, as amended, 

3 are waived. The previous question shall be considered as 

4 ordered on the bill, as amended, to final passage without 

5 intervening motion except: (1) two hours of debate equally 

6 divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking mi7 nority member of the Committee on the Budget; and (2) 

8 one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

9 SEC. 2. During consideration of H.R. 4241 pursuant 

10 to this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the 

11 previous question, the Chair may postpone further consid12 eration of the bill to a time designated by the Speaker. 

House Calendar No. 115 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 542 

[Report No. 109–281] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4241) 

for fiscal year 2006. 201(a) of the concurrent resolution on the budget to provide for reconciliation pursuant to section 

NOVEMBER 9, 2005 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7100 Received in Senate (RDS)]

<DOC>
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7100

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 18, 2024

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the organization of 
   the Office of Survivors Assistance of the Department of Veterans 
                                Affairs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Prioritizing Veterans' Survivors 
Act''.

SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF ORGANIZATION OF THE OFFICE OF SURVIVORS 
              ASSISTANCE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS.

    Section 321(a) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``in the Department'' and inserting ``in the Office of the 
Secretary''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 17, 2024.

            Attest:

                                             KEVIN F. MCCUMBER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06-09-00010-CR

______________________________

DARNELL HARTSFIELD, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

 

On Appeal from the Fourth Judicial District Court

Rusk County, Texas

Trial Court No. CR05-337

 

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 A jury convicted Darnell Hartsfield of five counts of capital murder; he was sentenced to 

punishment at life imprisonment. Hartsfield appeals from his conviction and has filed a single 

brief, in which he raises issues common to all of his appeals.1 He argues that the trial court 

committed reversible error in that (1) the evidence supporting his conviction was legally and 

factually insufficient and (2) admitting evidence of an extraneous offense. 

 We addressed these issues in detail in our opinion of this date in Hartsfield’s appeal in 

cause number 06-09-00006-CR. For the reasons stated therein, we likewise conclude that error 

has not been shown in this case.

 We affirm the trial court’s judgment. 

Josh R. Morriss, III

Chief Justice

Date Submitted: October 21, 2009

Date Decided: February 4, 2010

Do Not Publish

 

1 Defendant appeals from five convictions, for capital murder, cause numbers 06-09-00006-CR through

06-09-00010-CR.
#### § 2900.2 Non-Federal entity.

In the DOL, Non-Federal entity means a state, local government, Indian tribe, institution of higher education (IHE), for-profit entity, foreign public entity, foreign organization or nonprofit organization that carries out a Federal award as a recipient or subrecipient (see 2 CFR 200.1).

[86 FR 22108, Apr. 27, 2021]
# EUR-Lex - 31993R2740 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31993R2740

**COMMISSION REGULATION (EEC) No 2740/93 of 4 October 1993 re-establishing the levying of customs duties on products falling within CN code 6911, originating in Sri Lanka, to which the preferential tariff arrangements set out in Council Regulation (EEC) No 3831/90 apply **

*
Official Journal L 248 , 06/10/1993 P. 0004 - 0004 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EEC) No 2740/93 of 4 October 1993 re-establishing the levying of customs duties on products falling within CN code 6911, originating in Sri Lanka, to which the preferential tariff arrangements set out in Council Regulation (EEC) No 3831/90 apply

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 3831/90 of 20 December 1990 applying generalized tariff preferences for 1991 in respect of certain industrial products originating in developing countries (1), extended for 1993 by Regulation (EEC) No 3917/92 (2), and in particular Article 9 thereof,

Whereas, pursuant to Articles 1 and 6 of Regulation (EEC) No 3831/90, suspension of customs duties shall be accorded for 1993 to each of the countries or territories listed in Annex III other than those listed in column 4 of Annex I, within the framework of the preferential tariff ceilings fixed in column 6 of Annex I;

Whereas, as provided for in Article 7 of that Regulation, as soon as the individual ceilings in question are reached at Community level, the levying of customs duties on imports of the products in question originating in each of the countries and territories concerned may at any time be re-established;

Whereas, in the case of products falling within CN code 6911, originating in Sri Lanka, the individual ceiling was fixed at ECU 882 000; whereas on 16 June 1993 imports of these products into the Community originating in Sri Lanka reached the ceiling in question after being charged thereagainst; whereas, it is appropriate to re-establish the levying of customs duties in respect of the products in question against Sri Lanka,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

As from 9 October 1993, the levying of customs duties, suspended for 1993 pursuant to Council Regulation (EEC) No 3831/90, shall be re-established on imports into the Community of the following products, originating in Sri Lanka:

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 4 October 1993.

For the Commission

Christiane SCRIVENER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 370, 31. 12. 1990, p. 1.

(2) OJ No L 396, 31. 12. 1992, p. 1.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998             MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998             MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       5,523,416               5,523,416
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,395,086               7,395,086
<ALLOWANCES>                                   278,495                 278,495
<INVENTORY>                                  2,783,070               2,783,070
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,536,186              16,536,186
<PP&E>                                      55,809,950              55,809,950
<DEPRECIATION>                              22,235,256              22,235,256
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              51,158,162              51,158,162
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,900,591               9,900,591
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        44,640                  44,640
<OTHER-SE>                                  37,721,692              37,721,692
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                37,766,332              37,766,332
<SALES>                                     12,992,054              46,721,054
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,992,054              46,721,054
<CGS>                                        8,439,531              29,744,531
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,439,531              29,744,531
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                (254,014)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,681,064               9,788,064
<INCOME-TAX>                                   999,564               3,687,564
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,681,501               6,100,501
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,681,501               6,100,501
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.38                    1.37<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.34                    1.25
<FN>
<F1>For Purposes of This Exhibit, Primary means Basic.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 110
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 110 appear at 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 110.19 Exclusions. ( a ) The following operations are not subject to this part: Establishments engaged solely in the harvesting, storage, or distribution of one or more “raw agricultural commodities,” as defined in section 201(r) of the act, which are ordinarily cleaned, prepared, treated, or otherwise processed before being marketed to the consuming public.
( b ) FDA, however, will issue special regulations if it is necessary to cover these excluded operations.
# EUR-Lex - 31988D0284 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31988D0284

**88/284/EEC: Commission Decision of 19 April 1988 fixing the agro-economic trend coefficient to be used for defining the European size unit in connection with the Community typology for agricultural holdings **

*
Official Journal L 121 , 11/05/1988 P. 0065 - 0065 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 26 P. 0171 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 26 P. 0171 *

*****

COMMISSION DECISION

of 19 April 1988

fixing the agro-economic trend coefficient to be used for defining the European size unit in connection with the Community typology for agricultural holdings

(88/284/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 79/65/EEC of 15 June 1965 setting up a network for the collection of accountancy data on the incomes and business operation of agricultural holdings in the European Economic Community (1), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 3644/85 (2),

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1463/84 on 24 May 1984 on the organization of surveys on the structure of agricultural holdings for 1985 and for 1987 (3), and in particular Article 6 (2) thereof,

Whereas Annex III to Commission Decision 85/377/EEC of 7 June 1985 establishing a Community typology for agricultural holdings (4) defines the European size unit; whereas the definition refers to a coefficient to take account of global agro-economic trends since the reference period '1980'; whereas the coefficient is to be calculated by the Commission and fixed after consultation with the Member States and whereas such consultation has taken place at the meetings of the group of experts 'Typology for agricultural holdings',

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The agro-economic trend coefficient used for defining the European size unit as provided for in Annex III (A) (2) to Decision 85/377/EEC is hereby fixed, for the trend between the reference periods '1980' and '1984', at 1,2.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 April 1988.

For the Commission

Peter SCHMIDHUBER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No 109, 23. 6. 1965, p. 1859/65.

(2) OJ No L 348, 24. 12. 1985, p. 4.

(3) OJ No L 142, 29. 5. 1984, p. 3.

(4) OJ No L 220, 17. 8. 1985, p. 1.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                              Washington, DC 20549

                                  FORM 10-QSB/A

[ X ]       QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
            EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

            For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002.

            OR

[   ]       TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
            EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

            For the transition period from             to
                                           -----------    -----------


                          Bio-Medical Automation, Inc.
                          ----------------------------
       (Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter.)

          Colorado                     0-16335               84-0922701
----------------------------      ----------------         -------------
(State or other jurisdiction      (Commission File         (IRS Employer
     of incorporation)                 Number)          Identification No.)


                 10 South Street, Suite. 202, Ridgefield, CT 06877

                                 (203) 894-9755
                                 --------------
                           (Issuer's telephone number,
                              including area code)

Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section
13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes   X   No
                                                               ---     ---

As of November 11, 2002 the Registrant had outstanding 813,028 shares of common
stock, par value $.10

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one):
Yes      No  X
    ---     ---


         Bio-Medical Automation, Inc. files this amendment to its quarterly
report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 to include as an
exhibit the Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


<PAGE>
§ 1108.50 Approved budget. *Approved budget* means, in conjunction with a DoD Component award to a recipient, the most recent version of the budget the recipient submitted, and the DoD Component approved (either at the time of the initial award or subsequently), to summarize planned expenditures for the project or program under the award. It includes: ( a ) All Federal funding made available to the recipient under the award to use for project or program purposes.
( b ) Any cost sharing or matching that the recipient is required to provide under the award.
( c ) Any options that have been exercised but not any options that have not yet been exercised.
§ 1329.10 What does this part do? This part requires that the award and administration of Department of Commerce grants and cooperative agreements comply with Office of Management and Budget (OMB) guidance implementing the portion of the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 (41 U.S.C. 701-707, as amended, hereafter referred to as “the Act”) that applies to grants. It thereby— ( a ) Gives regulatory effect to the OMB guidance (subparts A through F of 2 CFR part 182) for the Department of Commerce's grants and cooperative agreements; and
( b ) Establishes Department of Commerce policies and procedures for compliance with the Act that are the same as those of other Federal agencies, in conformance with the requirement in 41 U.S.C. 705 for Governmentwide implementing regulations.
§ 1122.110 Organization of each article of national policy requirements. Each of NP Articles I through IV includes two sections. ( a ) Section A of each article includes national policy requirements that are cross-cutting in that their applicability extends to many or all DoD awards. Appendices A through D to this part provide standard wording for each of those requirements.
( b ) Section B of each article is the location in the award for program-specific national policy requirements. Section B is reserved in the standard wording of the articles provided in appendices A through D to this part.
H. Res. 410 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 27, 2017. 

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are 

hereby, elected to the following standing committees of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION AND THE WORKFORCE: 

Mrs. Handel. 

COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY: Mr. Estes of 

Kansas. 

COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY: Mrs. Handel. 

COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES: Mr. Gianforte. 

COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM: Mr. Gianforte. 

COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, SPACE, AND TECHNOLOGY: 

Mr. Norman. 

COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS: Mr. Norman. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 2 (Tuesday, January 4, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 415-416]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-33217]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation


Advisory Board; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463; 5 U.S.C. App. I), notice is hereby given of a meeting 
of the Advisory Board of the Saint Lawrence Seaway Development 
Corporation (SLSDC), to be held from 1 p.m. (EDT) on Monday, January 
24, 2011, via conference call at the Corporation's Administration 
Headquarters, Suite W32-300, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, 
DC. The agenda for this meeting will be as follows: Opening Remarks; 
Consideration of Minutes of Past Meeting; Quarterly Report; Old and New 
Business; Closing Discussion; Adjournment.
    Attendance at the meeting is open to the interested public but 
limited to the space available. With the approval of the Administrator, 
members of the public may present oral statements at the meeting. 
Persons wishing further information should contact, not later than 
Wednesday, January 19, 2011, Anita K. Blackman, Chief of Staff, Saint 
Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue,

[[Page 416]]

SE., Washington, DC 20590; 202-366-0091.
    Any member of the public may present a written statement to the 
Advisory Board at any time.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on December 28, 2010.
Collister Johnson, Jr.,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2010-33217 Filed 1-3-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-61-P