alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Josiah Winterhoff

302 South 7 th 

### Avenue Wausau, WI 54401 Cell: 715

- 574

- 1050 Email: josiah.winterhoff@gmail.com

I, Josiah Winterhoff, hereby submit this petition for exemption under Section 333; FAA Modern ization and Reform Act of 2012, Public Law 112

- 95 FEB. 14, 2012, Section 333. I request this exemption in order to operate my UAV/UAS, DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus Professional Quadcopter Aircraft, in order to provide services for profit to include aerial pho tography, aerial cinematography, aerial filming and photography for real estate, construction firms, aerial mapping, agriculture mapping, special events to include but not limited to weddings, private or public parties/events, business advertising, promoti onal events, geological surveying, and environmental studies.

The ability to provide these services to other local businesses and individuals in my community will benefit them by opening up opportunities they otherwise did not have before. Traditional met hods of aerial photography/videography are simply not viable options for the average consumer as they are costly and involve greater risks to everyone involved; i.e. the use of larger aircraft carrying humans and flammable fuel. By utilizing the UAV/UAS th e same results can be achieved with much safer conditions.
Prior to each flight/operation of the UAV/UAS, I will conduct a Pre

-Flight Safety Inspection. Only the manufacturers authorized repair facilities/ providers will perform any and all repairs. Flights will not take place over densely populated areas or private property without the owners permission. The UAV/UAS will only be operated within visual line of sight and will not be flown near airports or above 400 feet. The FAA can be confident that opera tions of this UAV/UAS will achieve at least the equivalent or greater level of safety.

The requests of this petition are similar to those of Mr. Todd Thomas Drone Pics, and Mr. Mike Lloyd & Associates, all of who have received Section 333 exemptions for c omparable aircraft for similar operations.

The specific sections of 14 C.F.R from which I am seeking exemption are as follows: 14 C.F.R. Part 21; 14 C.F.R. 45.23(b); 14 C.F.R. 61.101(e)(4), & (5); 14 C.F.R. 61.113(a) & (b); 14 C.F.R. 61.133 (a); 14 C.F.R. 61.23(a) & (c); 14 C.F.R 91.7(a) 14 C.F.R. 91.9(b)(2); 14C.F.R. 91.109(a); 14 C.F.R. 91.119; 14 C.F.R. 91.121; 14 C.F.R. 91.151(a); 14 C.F.R. 91.203(a) & (b); 14 C.F.R. 91.405(a);14 C.F.R. 91.407(a)(1);

14 C.F.R. 91.409(a)(2}; 14 C.F.R. 91.417(a) & (b).

Please find the included User Manual of which I have reviewed for safe flight operations. I truly thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely, Josiah Winterhoff

http://download.dji

innovations.com/downloads/phantom_2_vision_plus/en/Phantom_2_Vision_Plus _User_Manual_v1.8_en.pdf
**Exhibit 31.1**
**Section 302 Certification**
I, Ernest S. Rady, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Westcorp; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have;
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial data; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.   Date: August 6, 2004      By /s/ Ernest S. Rady  Ernest S. Rady Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
# EUR-Lex - 31993D0509 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31993D0509

**93/509/EEC: Commission Decision of 21 September 1993 amending Decision 93/195/EEC as regards the re-entry of registered horses from certain racetrack complexes in the United States of America **

*
Official Journal L 238 , 23/09/1993 P. 0044 - 0044 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 52 P. 0157 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 52 P. 0157 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 21 September 1993 amending Decision 93/195/EEC as regards the re-entry of registered horses from certain racetrack complexes in the United States of America

(93/509/EEC)THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 90/426/EEC of 26 June 1990 on animal health conditions governing the movement and import from third countries of equidae (1), as last amended by Directive 92/36/EEC (2), and in particular Article 19 (ii) thereof,

Whereas the Commission, by Decision 93/195/EEC (3), laid down the animal health conditions and veterinary certification for the re-entry of registered horses for racing, competition and cultural events after temporary export;

Whereas the presence of equine viral arteritis has been confirmed at Arlington International Racetrack, Illinois, Churchill Downs, Kentucky, Ak-sar-ben, Nebraska and Prairie Meadows, Iowa in the United States of America;

Whereas the apperance of equine viral arteritis is likely to constitute a danger on the re-entry, after temporary export, of Community registered horses which have participated in competitions at the racetrack complexes concerned;

Whereas, consequently, steps should be taken to prohibit, in accordance with the abovementioned Decision, the re-entry, after temporary export, of registered horses for racing, competition and cultural events from the racetrack complexes concerned; whereas, in the light of the epizootiological knowledge of this disease, the prohibition should be limited to a period of six months;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Decision 93/195/EEC is hereby amended as follows:

1. in Annex I, Group C, 'United States of America' is replaced by 'United States of America (with the exception, until 28 February 1994, of the following racetrack complexes: Arlington International Racetrack, Illinois, Churchill Downs, Kentucky, Ak-sar-ben, Nebraska, and Prairie Meadows, Iowa)';

2. in Annex II, Group C, 'United States of America' is replaced by 'United States of America (with the exception, until 28 February 1994, of the following racetrack complexes: Arlington International Racetrack, Illinois, Churchill Downs, Kentucky, Ak-sar-ben, Nebraska, and Prairie Meadows, Iowa)'.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 21 September 1993.

For the Commission

René STEICHEN

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 224, 18. 8. 1990, p. 42.

(2) OJ No L 157, 10. 6. 1992, p. 28.

(3) OJ No L 86, 6. 4. 1993, p. 1.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

Appellate case name: Bruce Egrim Joseph v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-14-00737-CR

Trial court case number: 05-DCR-043408A

Trial court: 268th District Court of Fort Bend County

On November 13, 2014, this Court denied appellant’s motion for rehearing without 

modifying or vacating our judgment or issuing a different opinion. On November 26, 2014, 

appellant filed “Appellant’s Further Motion for Rehearing.” The appellate rules authorize a 

second or subsequent motion for rehearing only if the court of appeals alters its judgment or 

opinion in conjunction with the overruling of a previous motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.5. 

Because our denial of appellant’s original motion for rehearing did not alter our judgment or 

opinion, appellant’s further motion for rehearing is not authorized by the appellate rules. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 49.5; Rodriguez v. State, 28 S.W.3d 25, 26 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.]

2002, no pet.) (“Even if appellant’s further motion for rehearing were timely, rule 49.5 does not 

apply because we did not modify the judgment, vacate the judgment, or issue a new opinion in 

overruling the motion.”). Accordingly, it is ordered that appellant’s further motion for rehearing 

is denied.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jane Bland

Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Justices Higley, Bland, and Sharp.

Date: December 18, 2014
###### Editorial Note on Part 25

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 25 appear at 79 FR 75879, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 25.215 Requirements for agency information systems.

Each Federal awarding agency that awards Federal financial assistance (as defined in § 25.406) must ensure that systems processing information related to the Federal awards, and other systems as appropriate, are able to accept and use the unique entity identifier as the universal identifier for Federal financial assistance applicants and recipients.

[85 FR 49523, Aug. 13, 2020]
§ 1150.11 Notification of assessments. ( a ) *Notification.* No later than 30 calendar days before the end of each fiscal year quarter, FDA will notify each domestic manufacturer and importer of the amount of the quarterly assessment imposed on the domestic manufacturer or importer.
( b ) *Content of notification.* The notification under paragraph (a) of this section will include the following: ( 1 ) The amount of the quarterly assessment imposed on the domestic manufacturer or importer and the date that payment of the assessment must be received by FDA;
( 2 ) Class assessment information, including each class' initial percentage share, the reallocation amount (if any) and each class' percentage share after any such reallocation, and the quarterly assessment for each class;
( 3 ) Domestic manufacturer or importer assessment information, including the domestic manufacturer's or importer's percentage share of each relevant class of tobacco products and invoice amount;
( 4 ) Any adjustments FDA has made under § 1150.9(b);
( 5 ) The manner in which assessments are to be remitted to FDA;
( 6 ) Information about the accrual of interest if a payment is late; and
( 7 ) Information regarding where to send a dispute and when it needs to be sent.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 18, 2017. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, January 18, 2017 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A17D0218. CITY OF MORROW, GEORGIA v. QUANTUM NATIONAL BANK.
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 2015CV2505
§ 1230.11 Required wording. ( a ) The common name of the dangerous caustic or corrosive substance which shall appear on the label or sticker is the name given in section 2(a) of the act (44 Stat. 1406; 15 U.S.C. 402) or any other name commonly employed to designate and identify such substance.
( b ) Preparations within the scope of the act bearing trade or fanciful names shall, in addition, be labeled with the common name of the dangerous caustic or corrosive substance contained therein and comply with all the other requirements of the act and of the regulations in this part.
H. Res. 763

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

June 6, 2006.

Whereas research shows that spending time together as a 

family is critical to raising strong and resilient kids; 

Whereas strong healthy families improve the quality of life 

and the development of children; 

Whereas it is essential to celebrate and reflect upon the important role that all families play in the lives of children 

and their positive effect for the Nation’s future; and 

Whereas the country’s greatest natural resource is its children: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

the goals and ideals of a National Children and Families Day 

to—

(1) encourage adults to support, listen to, and encourage children throughout the Nation; 

(2) reflect upon the important role that all families 

play in the lives of children; and 
2

•HRES 763 EH 

(3) recognize that strong, healthy families improve 

the quality of life and the development of children.

Attest: 

Clerk.
#### § 3513.220 What contracts and subcontracts, in addition to those listed in 2 CFR 180.220, are covered transactions?

Although the OMB guidance at 2 CFR 180.220(c) allows a Federal agency to do so (also see optional lower tier coverage in the figure in the appendix to 2 CFR part 180), Ex-Im Bank does not extend coverage of nonprocurement suspension and debarment requirements beyond first-tier procurement under a covered nonprocurement transaction.
#### § 1240.95 Sanitation of water boats.

No vessel engaged in interstate traffic shall obtain water for drinking and culinary purposes from any water boat unless the tanks, piping, and other appurtenances used by the water boat in the loading, transportation, and delivery of such drinking and culinary water, have been approved by the Commissioner of Food and Drugs.

[40 FR 5620, Feb. 6, 1975, as amended at 48 FR 11431, Mar. 18, 1983]
Feb 28, 2023





Servicer Compliance Statement

For SEMT 2013-3 (see Schedule A)





The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of First Republic Bank (the “Servicer”), does hereby certify that:



(i) a review of the Servicer’s activities during the reporting period from January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022 and of its performance under the Agreement (as defined on Schedule A attached hereto) from the above referenced trust during such period has been made under such officer’s supervision, and


(ii) to the best of such officers’ knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout such reporting period.
















First Republic Bank





By: /s/ Gloria Wagner

_________________________________

Name:	Gloria Wagner

Title: Vice President of Residential Lending

Date:Feb. 28, 2023











---



<for SEMT 2013-3>

SCHEDULE A



1. Flow Mortgage Loan Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2010, between Redwood Residential Acquisition Corporation and First Republic Bank, as modified by the Reconstitution Agreement dated March 1, 2013 (the “Agreement”).






---
#### § 3369.10 What does this part do?

This part adopts the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) guidance in subparts A through I of 2 CFR part 180, as supplemented by this part, as the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) policies and procedures for nonprocurement debarment and suspension. It thereby gives regulatory effect for the NEH to the OMB guidance as supplemented by this part. This part satisfies the requirements in section 3 of Executive Order 12549, “Debarment and Suspension” (3 CFR 1986 Comp., p. 189), Executive Order 12689, “Debarment and Suspension” (3 CFR 1989 Comp., p. 235) and 31 U.S.C. 6101 note (Section 2455, Public Law 103-355, 108 Stat. 3327).
ICRAS 1469 1845-0105 v2 – Affected Public - Individuals 7/18/2013

This request is to extend the information collection for the requirements in the policies and 

procedures related to the eligibility of foreign schools to apply to participate in Title IV, HEA 

programs that were added by the Higher Education Opportunity Act of 2008 (HEOA). 

§600.55 – Additional criteria for determining whether a foreign graduate medical school is 

eligible to apply to participate in the Direct Loan Program.

Regulation §600.55(c)(2) requires a foreign graduate medical school to determine the consent 

requirements to meet their specific country’s privacy laws and require the necessary consents of 

all students, who are U.S. citizens, nationals, or eligible permanent residents, that have been 

accepted for admission to enable the foreign school to comply with the collection and submission 

requirements in §600.55(d) for Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) scores, residency

placement, and U.S. Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) scores. 

Section 600.55 – Additional criteria for determining whether a foreign graduate medical school 

is eligible to apply to participate in the Title IV, HEA programs.

§600.55(c)(2) – Admission criteria

# of Respondents # of Responses Hrs/Response # of Burden Hours

Individual

2,500 2,500 X.08 200

TOTALS

Responses 2,500

Respondents 2,500

Burden Hours 200
RESIDENTIAL FUNDING MORTGAGE SECURITIES II, INC.
FORM 10-K
PART IV, ITEM 5(B)                                          PAGE 1
EXHIBIT #4  PROPERTIES                                      02/28/2000



             Mortagage Pools                    Number of Holders of Record
                    1996-HI6                         1
                    1996-HS1                         5
                    1996-HS3                         6
                   1996-RHS4                         6
                    1997-HI1                         6
                  1997-GMAC4                         3
                    1997-HI1                         6
                    1997-HI3                         6
                    1997-HS2                         4
                    1997-HI1                         1
                    1998-HI2                         9
                    1998-HI4                         2
                    1998-HS1                         5
                    1999-HI1                         7
                    1999-HI4                         4
                    1999-HI6                         6
                    1999-HI8                         2
                    1999-HS5                         2



<PAGE>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 249 (Wednesday, December 29, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 82128]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32890]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7279]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Vishnu: Hinduism's Blue-Skinned Savior''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000, I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Vishnu: Hinduism's Blue-Skinned Savior,'' 
imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, 
are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Frist Center 
for the Visual Arts, Nashville, TN, from on or about February 20, 2011, 
until on or about May 29, 2011; at the Brooklyn Museum, Brooklyn, NY, 
from on or about June 24, 2011, until on or about October 2, 2011, and 
at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is 
in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is 
ordered to be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol B. Epstein, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202/632-6473). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-
5, L/PD, Fifth Floor, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: December 15, 2010.
Ann Stock,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-32890 Filed 12-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
§ 700.13 Additional provisions for awards to for-profit entities. ( a ) This paragraph contains additional provisions that apply to awards to for-profit entities. These provisions supplement and make exceptions for awards to for-profit entities from other provisions of this part. ( 1 ) Prohibition against profit. No funds will be paid as profit to any for-profit entity receiving or administering Federal financial assistance as a recipient or subrecipient. Federal financial assistance does not include contracts as defined at 2 CFR 200.22, other contracts a Federal agency uses to buy goods or services from a contractor, or contracts to operate Federal government owned, contractor operated facilities (GOCOs). Profit is any amount in excess of allowable direct and indirect costs.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
( b ) [Reserved]
[80 FR 55722, Sept. 17, 2015, as amended at 87 FR 60059, Oct. 4, 2022]
###### Editorial Note on Part 25

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 25 appear at 79 FR 75879, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 25.105 Types of awards to which this part applies.

This part applies to a Federal awarding agency's grants, cooperative agreements, loans, and other types of Federal financial assistance as defined in § 25.406.

[85 FR 49522, Aug. 13, 2020]
§ 3474.1 Adoption of 2 CFR part 200. ( a ) The Department of Education adopts the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Guidance in 2 CFR part 200, except for 2 CFR 200.102(a) and 2 CFR 200.207(a). Thus, this part gives regulatory effect to the OMB guidance and supplements the guidance as needed for the Department.
( b ) The authority for all of the provisions in 2 CFR part 200 as adopted in this part is listed as follows.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3, 3474, and 2 CFR part 200.)