alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 180

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 180 appear at 79 FR 75879, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 180.440 What action may I take if a primary tier participant knowingly does business with an excluded or disqualified person?

If a participant knowingly does business with an excluded or disqualified person, you as a Federal agency official may refer the matter for suspension and debarment consideration. You may also disallow costs, annul or terminate the transaction, issue a stop work order, or take any other appropriate remedy.
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1030 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the territories 

of Abkhazia and South Ossetia are a part of the sovereign state of 

Georgia and condemning the decision by the Syrian Arab Republic to 

recognize these territories as independent of Georgia. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 25, 2018 

Mr. FRANCIS ROONEY of Florida (for himself, Mr. CONNOLLY, and Mr. POE

of Texas) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

the territories of Abkhazia and South Ossetia are a part 

of the sovereign state of Georgia and condemning the 

decision by the Syrian Arab Republic to recognize these 

territories as independent of Georgia. 

Whereas the United States established diplomatic relations 

with Georgia in 1992 and codified those relations in the 

2009 United States-Georgia Charter on Strategic Partnership; 

Whereas Georgia has been a committed partner of the North 

Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and has contributed significant troops and resources to the NATO misVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:53 Jul 26, 2018 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR1030.IH HR1030

lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1030 IH 

sions in Afghanistan and the Multi-National Force in 

Iraq; 

Whereas Georgia maintains peaceful relations with its neighbors in the Caucasus region and has been a reliable partner in promoting peace and democracy in the Eurasia region; 

Whereas the United States and its partners must stand up 

against the Russian Federation’s expansion into territories of the former Soviet Union; 

Whereas the Russian Federation violates international law by 

continuously occupying sovereign territory in Georgia and 

has on multiple occasions meddled in the affairs of Georgia during the war in Abkhazia from 1992–1993 and 

during the Russo-Georgian war in August 2008; 

Whereas only 5 member states of the United Nations recognize Abkhazia or South Ossetia as independent of Georgia; 

Whereas the Syrian Arab Republic is a failed client-state of 

the Russian Federation and the Islamic Republic of Iran; 

and 

Whereas the Russian Federation, in its effort to disrupt the 

West and its allies, will use failed states such as the Syrian Arab Republic to push its geopolitical agenda and 

lend credibility to the territories it illegally occupies: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes Georgia’s sovereignty and terri3 torial integrity, and reaffirms that the regions of 

4 Abkhazia and South Ossetia, currently occupied by 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1030 IH 

1 the Russian Federation, are territories of Georgia; 

2 and 

3 (2) condemns the decision by the Syrian Arab 

4 Republic, which is a client state of the Russian Fed5 eration, to recognize the independence of the regions 

6 of Abkhazia and South Ossetia. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than January 20, 2011.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Jacqueline G. King, Community Affairs Officer) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-0291:

                    1.                     *Richard M. Connor, Jr., Laona, Wisconsin,*                     to acquire and retain 25 percent or more of the voting shares of Northern Wisconsin Bank Holding Company, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire and retain voting shares of Laona State Bank, both of Laona, Wisconsin.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 28, 2010.

Jennifer J. Johnson,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2010-33080 Filed 12-30-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
Fw: 30 vs 90 and area sources 12/13/2011 05:11 PM

From: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US

To: Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov

Cc: tsirigotis.peter@epa.gov, Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Kevin Culligan/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cortney -

Attached below are two documents. The first is an explanation of the 30- versus 60-day limit issue, and why the limit gets tighter with a longer averaging time; and, second, the analysis of the 4 area source units in the attached spreadsheet. Please let us know if you have any questions.

thanx!

bob

Robert J. Wayland, Ph.D. Leader, Energy Strategies Group U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards Sector Policies and Programs Division Mail Code D243-01 RTP, NC 27711

Phone: (919) 541-1045 Cell: (919) 306-2290 Fax: (919) 541-5450

e-mail: wayland.robertj@epa.gov

********************************************************* DRAFT/Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt

********************************************************* ----- Forwarded by RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US on 12/13/2011 05:10 PM

----- From: Kevin Culligan/DC/USEPA/US To: Peter Tsirigotis/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Nick Hutson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 12/13/2011 03:23 PM Subject: 30 vs 90 and area sources

\ 30 vs 90 limits.docx

area sources.xlsx
#### § 5800.137 Who at the Commission may grant an exception to let an excluded person participate in a covered transaction?

The Commission's Contracting Officer has the authority to grant an exception to let an excluded person participate in a covered transaction, as provided in the OMB guidance at 2 CFR 180.135.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 246 (Thursday, December 23, 2010)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 80673]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32463]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 75 , No. 246 / Thursday, December 23, 2010 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 80673]]

                Memorandum of December 20, 2010

                
Delegation of Certain Functions and Authorities

                Memorandum for the Director of the Office of Personnel 
                Management

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States, 
                including section 301 of title 3, United States Code, I 
                hereby delegate to you the functions and authority 
                conferred upon the President by section 7301 of title 
                5, United States Code, with respect to providing 
                appropriate workplace accommodations for executive 
                branch civilian employees who are nursing mothers.

                You are authorized and directed to publish this 
                memorandum in the Federal Register. 
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, December 20, 2010

[FR Doc. 2010-32463
Filed 12-22-10; 8:45 am]
Billing code 6325-01-P
# EUR-Lex - 31993D0188 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31993D0188

**93/188/EEC: Commission Decision of 4 March 1993 amending Decision 92/486/EEC establishing the form of cooperation between the Animo host centre and Member States **

*
Official Journal L 082 , 03/04/1993 P. 0020 - 0020 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 49 P. 0051 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 49 P. 0051 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 4 March 1993 amending Decision 92/486/EEC establishing the form of cooperation between the Animo host centre and Member States

(93/188/EEC)THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 1990 concerning the veterinary and zootechnical checks applicable in intra-Community trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market (1), as last amended by Directive 92/118/EEC (2), and in particular Article 20 (3) thereof,

Whereas given the state of advance of the preparatory work in the Member States for the Animo computerized network a single date should be scheduled for bringing the system into operation; whereas this date should be taken into account in the provisions of Commission Decision 92/486/EEC (3) establishing the form of cooperation between the Animo host centre and Member States;

Whereas certain necessary elements of the contract to be concluded between the Animo host centre and each Member State should be specified;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Decision 92/486/EEC is hereby amended as follows:

1. In Article 2 the first indent is replaced by:

'- enter into force for three years beginning on 1 April 1993,`.

2. The following indent is added to Article 2:

'- include a clause covering updating, protection and availability of data, responsibilities, and the payment schedule.` 3. In Article 4, '1 July 1993` is replaced by '1 April 1994`.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 4 March 1993.

For the Commission René STEICHEN Member of the Commission
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 930 

Recognizing and honoring York for his role in the Lewis and Clark 

Expedition. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 20, 2006 

Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing and honoring York for his role in the Lewis 

and Clark Expedition. 

Whereas in 1804, Captain Meriwether Lewis, Captain William Clark, and a band of 32 men and 1 woman became 

the first Americans to explore the lands acquired in the 

Louisiana Purchase; 

Whereas among the explorers was an African American who 

is known only as William Clark’s slave, York; 

Whereas York played an integral role in the success of the 

mission, including hunting, gathering wood, and participating in all the tasks necessary to the success of the expedition; 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 930 IH 

Whereas York’s contribution to the expedition led to Clark 

naming ‘‘York’s 8 Islands’’ and ‘‘York’s Dry River’’ after 

him; 

Whereas York was the only member of the expedition who 

was not awarded land or pay upon return; 

Whereas upon return, York was returned to the degradation 

and captivity of slavery; and 

Whereas this year the Nation celebrates the bicentennial of 

the Lewis and Clark Expedition: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) honors York for his contributions to the 

3 Lewis and Clark Expedition; 

4 (2) recognizes York as the first African Amer5 ican to explore the lands acquired in the Louisiana 

6 Purchase; 

7 (3) urges students of American history to study 

8 the regrettably often overlooked role of York in the 

9 Lewis and Clark Expedition. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 119 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 119

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on the Judiciary in 
                  the One Hundred Fifteenth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 2017

Mr. Goodlatte submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                 the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on the Judiciary in 
                  the One Hundred Fifteenth Congress.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on the Judiciary (hereafter in 
this resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), including the 
expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out of the 
applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for committee 
salaries and expenses, not more than $16,382,000 for the One Hundred 
Fifteenth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $8,053,500 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2017, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2018; and
            (2) not more than $8,328,500 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2018, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2019.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
§ 1.379 How long may FDA detain an article of food? ( a ) FDA may detain an article of food for a reasonable period that may not exceed 20 calendar days after the detention order is issued. However, an article may be detained for 10 additional calendar days if a greater period of time is required to institute a seizure or injunction action. The authorized FDA representative may approve the additional 10-calendar day detention period at the time the detention order is issued, or at any time within the 20-calendar day period by amending the detention order.
( b ) The entire detention period may not exceed 30 calendar days.
( c ) An authorized FDA representative may, in accordance with § 1.384, terminate a detention order before the expiration of the detention period.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-60600 Summary Calendar

__________________ MARIE S. PRINGLE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus HENRY DAVIS, Board President, ET AL., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:94-CV-175 - - - - - - - - - - August 1, 1996 Before SMITH, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Marie S. Pringle appeals the dismissal of her lawsuit raising various federal and state law claims against a myriad of defendants. Pringle's motion to strike two appellate briefs submitted by two appellees is DENIED. We have carefully reviewed the record and the appellate arguments. We discern no reversible error by the district court in its dismissal.No. -2- AFFIRMED.
§ 2701.600 Other regulatory guidance. ( a ) In addition to the general regulations set forth above and those contained in 2 CFR part 200, the program-specific regulations governing the operation of SBA's individual grant programs may be found in title 13 of the Code of Federal Regulations beginning at the sections noted below: ( 1 ) New Markets Venture Capital program—13 CFR 108.2000.
( 2 ) Program for Investment in Microentrepreneurs (PRIME)—13 CFR 119.1.
( 3 ) Microloan program—13 CFR 120.700.
( 4 ) 7(j) Management and Technical Assistance program—13 CFR 124.701.
( 5 ) Small Business Development Center program—13 CFR 130.100.
( b ) [Reserved]
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1175 

Supporting increased awareness of sepsis and the importance of early 

diagnosis and appropriate intervention. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 11, 2018 

Ms. MATSUI (for herself and Mr. GUTHRIE) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting increased awareness of sepsis and the importance 

of early diagnosis and appropriate intervention. 

Whereas sepsis is a medical condition resulting from an immune system response to an infection; 

Whereas this overwhelming response to infection can rapidly 

lead to tissue damage, organ failure, and death; 

Whereas over 1.7 million individuals in the United States develop sepsis each year; 

Whereas over 270,000 individuals in the United States die 

from sepsis each year, more than from prostate cancer, 

breast cancer, and HIV/AIDS combined; 

Whereas the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that one in three patients who die in a hospital 

have sepsis; 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1175 IH 

Whereas according to the Agency for Healthcare Research 

and Quality, sepsis is the most common diagnosis for inpatient hospital stays in the United States; 

Whereas sepsis is the most expensive condition treated in 

hospitals in the United States, consuming over $24 billion each year; 

Whereas sepsis is the number one cause of hospital readmissions, generating over $2 billion in costs annually; 

Whereas over 80 percent of septic patients are septic upon 

admission to the hospital; 

Whereas mortality from sepsis increases by up to eight percent for every hour that treatment is delayed; 

Whereas rapid diagnosis and treatment can prevent up to 80 

percent of sepsis fatalities; and 

Whereas the combination of early detection of sepsis and appropriate interventions can significantly improve the 

chances of survival for patients with all types of sepsis: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) is committed to increasing awareness of 

3 sepsis and encouraging the education of patients, 

4 families, health care professionals, and government 

5 agencies on the critical importance of early diagnosis 

6 as the key for patients to survive sepsis; and 

7 (2) supports innovative public-private partner8 ships and the pursuit of innovative financing tools, 

9 incentives, and other mechanisms to accelerate the 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1175 IH 

1 pursuit of improved early detection and appropriate 

2 intervention for patients with sepsis. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
#### § 745.113 Suspension or Termination of IRB Approval of Research.

An IRB shall have authority to suspend or terminate approval of research that is not being conducted in accordance with the IRB's requirements or that has been associated with unexpected serious harm to subjects. Any suspension or termination of approval shall include a statement of the reasons for the IRB's action and shall be reported promptly to the investigator, appropriate institutional officials, and the department or agency head.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under Control Number 0990-0260)
Need to know more?

• Visit HealthCare.gov/marketplace-appeals.

• Call the Marketplace Appeals Center at 1-855-231-1751.

TTY users should call 1-855-739-2231.

• To get help with your Marketplace application or eligibility

appeal, visit LocalHelp.HealthCare.gov.

STEPS FOR A

MARKETPLACE APPEAL

Review your "Eligibility Results."

Mail or fax an appeal 

request form or letter.

Try to resolve the 

appeal informally.

Don’t agree? Your "Eligibility Results" 

notice tells how much time you have 

to start an appeal.

To get the form, visit 

HealthCare.gov/marketplace-appeals.

The Marketplace Appeals Center 

will contact you.

Request a

hearing.

A hearing is only needed if you can’t 

resolve your appeal informally.

CMS Product No.11854

Revised August 2016
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-51119

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LEROY SALAZAR GARZA,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

(A-01-CR-130-ALL-SS)

_________________________________________________________________

July 26, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Pursuant to his conditional guilty plea to possession of a

firearm by a convicted felon and possession of a stolen firearm,

Leroy Salazar Garza appeals the denial of his motion to suppress a

firearm discovered during a pat down search (following a traffic

stop) and made the basis of his conviction. Garza admits the

Officer who stopped him had reason to suspect he was the owner of

the truck he was driving and had outstanding arrest warrants. He
2

contends, however, that the totality of the circumstances fall

short of supporting a reasonable suspicion that he was armed.

Conclusions of law concerning a motion to suppress are

reviewed de novo; findings of fact, for clear error. United States

v. Jordan, 232 F.3d 447, 448 (5th Cir. 2000). Garza does not

challenge any findings of fact.

Given, inter alia, the degree of nervousness Garza exhibited,

his other suspicious behavior, the fact that the stop was made in

front of a daycare center, and the fact that Garza never took his

hands out of his pockets, the Officer’s pat down did not violate

the Fourth Amendment. Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 22-24, 27 (1968);

United States v. Webster, 162 F.3d 308, 332 (5th Cir. 1998), cert.

denied, 528 U.S. 829 (1999); United States v. Michelletti, 13 F.3d

838, 840-41 (5th Cir.)(en banc), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 829 (1994).

AFFIRMED