alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 1 (Monday, January 3, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 175]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-33047]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-64,458]


Continental Structural Plastics Including On-Site Leased Workers 
From Kelly Services and Time Staffing; North Baltimore, OH; Amended 
Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment 
Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as 
amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility 
to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade 
Adjustment Assistance on December 31, 2008, applicable to workers of 
Continental Structural Plastics, North Baltimore, Ohio. The notice was 
published in the Federal Register on January 26, 2009 (74 FR 4463).
    At the request of the UAW, Local 1889, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers produced 
exterior body panels and under body structural components for 
automobiles. The firm has since closed, eliminating the possibility of 
a new petition to cover these workers.
    New information shows that workers leased from Kelly Services and 
Time Staffing were employed on-site at the North Baltimore, Ohio 
location of Continental Structural Plastics. The Department has 
determined that these workers were sufficiently under the control of 
the subject firm to be considered leased workers.
    Based on these findings, the Department is amending this 
certification to include workers leased from Kelly Services and Time 
Staffing working on-site at the North Baltimore, Ohio location of 
Continental Structural Plastics.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-64,458 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Continental Structural Plastics, including on-
site leased workers from Kelly Services and Time Staffing, North 
Baltimore, Ohio, who became totally or partially separated from 
employment on or after November 11, 2007, through December 31, 2010, 
are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of 
the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for 
alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the 
Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 17th day of December 2010.
Michael W. Jaffe,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-33047 Filed 12-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 925 Reported in House (RH)]







                                                 House Calendar No. 216
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 925

                          [Report No. 109-579]

 Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5684) to implement the 
                United States-Oman Free Trade Agreement.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 19, 2006

 Mr. Hastings of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, reported the 
  following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and 
                         ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
 Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5684) to implement the 
                United States-Oman Free Trade Agreement.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order without intervention of any point of order to consider in the 
House the bill (H.R. 5684) to implement the United States-Oman Free 
Trade Agreement. The bill shall be considered as read. The bill shall 
be debatable for two hours equally divided and controlled by the 
chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and 
Means. Pursuant to section 151 of the Trade Act of 1974, the previous 
question shall be considered as ordered on the bill to final passage 
without intervening motion.
    Sec. 2. During consideration of H.R. 5684 pursuant to this 
resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the 
Chair may postpone further consideration of the bill to a time 
designated by the Speaker in consonance with section 151 of the Trade 
Act of 1974.
                                                 House Calendar No. 216

109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 925

                          [Report No. 109-579]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5684) to implement the 
                United States-Oman Free Trade Agreement.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 19, 2006

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
#### Paul Harry KING, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 74-1517.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

March 4, 1975.

*354Paul Harry King, pro se.

Eugene E. Siler, Jr., U. S. Atty., Lexington, Ky., James F. Cook, Robert M. Murphy, Asst. U. S. Attys., for respondent-appellee.

Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and PECK and LIVELY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

This appeal from the denial of a motion to vacate sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 has been assigned to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 3(e), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. The petitioner was convicted of four counts of mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341 “as part of a scheme and artifice to defraud.” The proof at his trial revealed that petitioner mailed falsified applications for credit cards to various issuers of such cards and after receiving them, used the cards to obtain property and money. In this proceeding petitioner maintains that the decision in United States v. Maze, 468 F.2d 529 (6th Cir. 1972), aff’d, 414 U.S. 395, 94 S.Ct. 645, 38 L.Ed.2d 603 (1974), requires that his conviction be set aside.

In *Maze,*the defendant stole a credit card and obtained property and money with it. The only use of the mails occurred after he had obtained the credit when the creditor sent the charges through the mails to the issuer of the credit card for collection. This court and the Supreme Court held that Section 1341 does not reach every unauthorized use of a credit card where the only use of the mails is to complete the billing process. In petitioner’s case the mails were used as the first step in executing a “scheme or artifice” for obtaining money or property by false or fraudulent pretense, and the holding in *Maze*does not apply.

Upon consideration of the entire record, including the briefs of the parties, the court concludes that the questions on which decision of this cause depends are so unsubstantial as not to require further argument. Rule 8, Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 250 (Thursday, December 30, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 82424]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32884]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7237]


The Secretary of State's International Council on Women's 
Business Leadership

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Notice of intent to establish an advisory committee.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Secretary of State announces an intent to establish the 
International Council on Women's Business Leadership, in accordance 
with the Federal Advisory Committee Act.
    Nature and Purpose: The Council will provide advice and assistance 
in the formulation of U.S. policy, positions, proposals and strategies 
for multilateral and bilateral negotiations, business outreach and 
commercial diplomacy, particularly pertaining to the economic 
empowerment of women for global economic prosperity where the State 
Department has the lead negotiating authority. The objective of the 
Council is to bring to the United States Government a source of 
expertise, knowledge and insight not available within the Department or 
elsewhere in the government on these issues.
    Other information: It is anticipated that the Council will meet at 
least once a year and at such other times and places as are required to 
fulfill the objectives of the Council. The Department of State affirms 
that the advisory committee is necessary and in the public interest.
    For further information, please contact: Nancy Smith-Nissley at 
(202) 647-1682.

    Dated: December 20, 2010.
Lorraine Hariton
Special Representative, Office of Commercial & Business Affairs, U.S. 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-32884 Filed 12-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-07-P
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear at 68 FR 24879, May 9, 2003, and at 88 FR 45064, July 14, 2023.

#### § 10.110 Settlement proposals.

At any time in the course of a proceeding subject to this part, a person may propose settlement of the issues involved. A participant in a proceeding will have an opportunity to consider a proposed settlement. Unaccepted proposals of settlement and related matters, e.g., proposed stipulations not agreed to, will not be admissible in evidence in an FDA administrative proceeding. FDA will oppose the admission in evidence of settlement information in a court proceeding or in another administrative proceeding.
§ 1138.515 Use and disposition of real property, equipment, supplies, and federally owned property under subawards. ( a ) *Requirement.* A DoD Component's general terms and conditions must specify the requirements concerning use and disposition of real property, equipment, supplies, and federally owned property that recipients must include in subawards.
( b ) *Award terms and conditions.* A DoD Component's general terms and conditions must use the wording appendix E to this part provides for Sections D through F of SUB Article V.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

DESMIN WALKER, §

§ No. 362 , 2021

Defendant Below, §

Appellant, § Court Below

— Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

v. §

§ C r

. ID No: N 2003012057

STATE OF DELAWARE

, §

§

Appellees

. §

Submitted: July 20 , 202 2

Decided: July 27 , 2022

Before SEITZ

, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and TRAYNOR

, Justices

.

ORDER

This 27 th day of July , 2022

, after consideration of the parties’ briefs and the

record on appeal, it appears to the Court that the judgment of the Superior Court

should be affirmed on the basis of its October 12, 2021 Memorandum Opinion.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior

Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gary F. Traynor

Justice
#### Kurvir SINGH, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-72870.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 11, 2005.*

Decided Oct. 21, 2005.

*556Inna Lipkin, Esq., Law Offices of Kuldip Singh Dhariwal, Fremont, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Paul H. Rochmes, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, Richard M. Evans, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Offiee of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: T.G. NELSON, WARDLAW, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suit*556able for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Kurvir Singh is a native and citizen of India. Singh petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision, which summarily affirmed the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252.

Where, as here, the BIA affirms without an opinion, we review the IJ’s decision directly. *See Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft,*350 F.3d 845, 849 (9th Cir.2003). We review for substantial evidence an adverse credibility determination. *Chebchoub v. INS,*257 F.3d 1038, 1042 (9th Cir.2001). We grant the petition and remand.

Substantial evidence does not support the IJ’s adverse credibility determination. *See Bandari v. INS,*227 F.3d 1160, 1165-66 (9th Cir.2000). The IJ’s adverse credibility findings were based upon impermissible speculation, *see id.*at 1166-67, and minor inconsistencies that do not go to the heart of Singh’s claim, *see Chebchoub.*at 1043. Also, the IJ’s demeanor finding that Singh was “very quiet” and had “little or no fervor” and thus would not give Indian police a reason to believe that he was involved with terrorists is not relevant to Singh’s claim.

Therefore, we grant the petition and remand for further proceedings to deter*557mine whether, accepting Singh’s testimony as credible, he is eligible for asylum, withholding of removal and CAT relief. *See INS v. Ventura, 537*U.S. 12, 16, 123 S.Ct. 353, 154 L.Ed.2d 272 (2002) (per curiam).

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED AND REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
§ 1150.5 Required information. ( a ) *General.* Each domestic manufacturer and importer of tobacco products that are part of a class of tobacco products must submit the information described in this section for such products each month, and the information must be received by FDA no later than the 20th day of each month. The information must be submitted using the form that FDA provides. The information must be submitted even if the domestic manufacturer or importer had no removals subject to tax during the prior month. FDA will use the information submitted under this section and any other available information, as FDA determines appropriate, to make tobacco product user fee assessments.
( b ) *Contents.* Each domestic manufacturer and importer must submit the following: ( 1 ) *Identification information.* ( i ) Its name and the mailing address of its principal place of business;
( ii ) The name and a telephone number including area code of an office or individual that FDA may contact for further information;
( iii ) The email address and postal address at which it wishes to receive notifications FDA sends under this part;
( iv ) The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) Permit Number(s); and
( v ) The Employer Identification Number(s) (EIN).
( 2 ) *Removal information.* The units of product, by class, removed and not tax exempt for the prior month and the Federal excise tax it paid, by class, for such removal. ( i ) This information must be reported for each TTB tobacco permit.
( ii ) If the domestic manufacturer or importer did not remove any amount of tobacco product, it must report that no tobacco product was removed into domestic commerce.
( 3 ) *Certified copies.* Certified copies of the returns and forms that relate to: ( i ) The removal of tobacco products into domestic commerce (as defined by section 5702 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986); and
( ii ) The payment of the Federal excise taxes imposed under chapter 52 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
( c ) *First report for cigars.* Domestic manufacturers and importers of cigars must submit the information described in this section beginning no later than the 20th day of August, 2016. Domestic manufacturers and importers of cigars must submit the information described in this section for each of the prior months of fiscal year 2016 as their first monthly submission. The previous sentence only applies for the first report in fiscal year 2016.
( d ) *First report for pipe tobacco.* Domestic manufacturers and importers of pipe tobacco must submit the information described in this section beginning no later than the 20th day of August, 2016.
[79 FR 39310, July 10, 2014, as amended at 81 FR 28715, May 10, 2016]
§ 1.900 Who is subject to this subpart? ( a ) Except for non-covered businesses as defined in § 1.904 and as provided for in paragraph (b) of this section, the requirements of this subpart apply to shippers, receivers, loaders, and carriers engaged in transportation operations whether or not the food is being offered for or enters interstate commerce. The requirements of this subpart apply in addition to any other requirements of this chapter that are applicable to the transportation of food, *e.g.,* in 21 CFR parts 1, 117, 118, 225, 507, and 589.
( b ) The requirements of this subpart do not apply to shippers, receivers, loaders, or carriers when they are engaged in transportation operations: ( 1 ) Of food that is transshipped through the United States to another country; or
( 2 ) Of food that is imported for future export, in accordance with section 801(d)(3) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, and that is neither consumed nor distributed in the United States; or
( 3 ) Of food when it is located in food facilities as defined in § 1.227 of this chapter, that are regulated exclusively, throughout the entire facility, by the U.S. Department of Agriculture under the Federal Meat Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 601 *et seq.*), the Poultry Products Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 451 *et seq.*), or the Egg Products Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 1031 *et seq.*).
Placeholder for information claimed as Confidential Business Information (CBI)

Information regarding processing categories and labor burden and cost estimates claimed as CBI

received in a letter from Micron Technology, Inc. on December 2, 2009. This information is 

being maintained in a separate confidential portion of the docket. 

For more information please contact Kirsten Cappel by phone at (202) 343-9556 or by email at 

cappel.kirsten@epa.gov.
Editorial Note on Part 12
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 12 appear at 88 FR 45064, July 14, 2023.

§ 12.40 Appearance. ( a ) A person who has filed a notice of participation under § 12.45 may appear in person or by counsel or other representative in any hearing and, subject to § 12.89, may be heard concerning all relevant issues.
( b ) The presiding officer may strike a person's appearance for violation of the rules of conduct in § 12.90.
# EUR-Lex - 31993D0345 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31993D0345

**93/345/EEC: Commission Decision of 26 May 1993 amending Decision 86/414/EEC as regards the list of establishments in Argentina approved for the purpose of importing meat products into the Community **

*
Official Journal L 139 , 10/06/1993 P. 0021 - 0022 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 49 P. 0258 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 49 P. 0258 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 26 May 1993 amending Decision 86/414/EEC as regards the list of establishments in Argentina approved for the purpose of importing meat products into the Community

(93/345/EEC)THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 72/462/EEC of 12 December 1972 on health and veterinary inspection problems upon importation of bovine animals and swine and fresh meat or meat products from third countries (1), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1601/92 (2), and in particular Article 4 (1) thereof,

Whereas a list of establishments in Argentina, approved for the purpose of importing meat products into the Community, was drawn up initially by Commission Decision 86/414/EEC (3), as last amended by Decision 93/201/EEC (4);

Whereas a Community on-the-spot visit to meat product establishments in Argentina has revealed that the level of hygiene in one establishment has improved since the last inspection; whereas the list of establishments should be amended accordingly;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Annex to Decision 86/414/EEC is hereby replaced by the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 May 1993.

For the Commission

René STEICHEN

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 302, 31. 12. 1972, p. 28.

(2) OJ No L 173, 27. 6. 1992, p. 13.

(3) OJ No L 237, 23. 8. 1986, p. 36.

(4) OJ No L 87, 7. 4. 1993, p. 15.

ANNEX

LIST OF ESTABLISHMENTS

/* Tables: see OJ */
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 999 

Urging Turkey to respect the rights and religious freedoms of the Ecumenical 

Patriarch. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 12, 2006 

Mrs. MALONEY (for herself, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. ANDREWS, Mr. HINCHEY, 

Ms. WATSON, Mr. DOYLE, Mr. CROWLEY, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mrs. LOWEY, and Mr. BACA) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on International Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Urging Turkey to respect the rights and religious freedoms 

of the Ecumenical Patriarch. 

Whereas Turkey began accession negotiations with the European Union on October 3, 2005; 

Whereas in 1993 the European Union defined the membership criteria for accession to the European Union at the 

Copenhagen European Council, obligating candidate 

countries to have achieved certain levels of reform, including stability of institutions guaranteeing democracy, 

the rule of law, and human rights, and respect for and 

protection of minorities; 

Whereas the Government of Turkey refuses to recognize the 

Ecumenical Patriarch’s international status; and 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 999 IH 

Whereas the Government of Turkey has limited to Turkish 

nationals the candidates available to the Holy Synod for 

selection as the Ecumenical Patriarch and has refused to 

reopen the Theological School at Halki, thus impeding 

training for the clergy: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) calls on Turkey to continue to demonstrate 

3 its willingness to adopt and uphold European stand4 ards for the protection of human rights; 

5 (2) based on the ideals associated with the Eu6 ropean Union and its member states, calls on Tur7 key to eliminate all forms of discrimination, particu8 larly those based on race or religion, and imme9 diately— 

10 (A) grant the Ecumenical Patriarch appro11 priate international recognition and ecclesiastic 

12 succession; 

13 (B) grant the Ecumenical Patriarchate the 

14 right to train clergy of all nationalities, not just 

15 Turkish nationals; and 

16 (C) respect property rights and human 

17 rights of the Ecumenical Patriarchate; and 

18 (3) calls on Turkey to pledge to uphold and 

19 safeguard religious and human rights without com20 promise. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
###### Editorial Note on Part 112

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 112 appear at 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

#### § 112.178 Under what circumstances may FDA deny a petition requesting a variance?

We may deny a variance request if it does not provide the information required under § 112.173 (including the requirements of § 10.30 of this chapter), or if we determine that the variance is not reasonably likely to ensure that the produce is not adulterated under section 402 of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and to provide the same level of public health protection as the requirements of this part.