In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 17-0891V 

Filed: August 14, 2018

UNPUBLISHED

ROCHELLE BELT, 

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Special Processing Unit (SPU); 

Attorneys’ Fees and Costs

Jeffrey S. Pop, Jeffrey S. Pop & Associates, Beverly Hills, CA, for petitioner.

Traci R. Patton, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION ON ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master:

 

On June 29, 2017, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National 

Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,

2 (the “Vaccine 

Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a Table injury, shoulder injury related to 

vaccine administration (“SIRVA”), or, in the alternative, that her right shoulder injury was 

caused-in-fact by the influenza vaccine she received on October 17, 2016. Petition at 1, 

¶¶ 5, 14. On July 27, 2018, the undersigned issued a decision awarding compensation 

to petitioner based on the parties’ stipulation. (ECF No. 25). 

On August 1, 2018, petitioner filed a motion for attorneys’ fees and costs. (ECF 

No. 29). Petitioner requests attorneys’ fees in the amount of $11,517.00 and attorneys’ 

costs in the amount of $881.48. Id. at 2. In compliance with General Order #9, 

 

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the 

undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with 

the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of 

Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to 

identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits 

within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012).
2 

petitioner filed a signed statement indicating that petitioner incurred no out-of-pocket 

expenses. Id. at 2. Thus, the total amount requested is $12,398.48. 

 

On August 7, 2018, respondent filed a response to petitioner’s motion. (ECF No. 

30). Respondent states that he “does not object to the overall amount sought.” Id. at 

1. Respondent adds the “lack of objection to the amount sought in this case should not 

be construed as admission, concession, or waiver as to the hourly rates requested, the 

number of hours billed, or the other litigation related costs.” Id. at 1. 

By email communication on August 10, 2018, petitioner‘s counsel confirmed 

petitioner did not intend to file a reply. See Informal Remark, dated August 13, 2018.

The undersigned has reviewed the billing records submitted with petitioner’s 

request. In the undersigned’s experience, the request appears reasonable, and the 

undersigned finds no cause to reduce the requested hours or rates. 

The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. 

§ 15(e). Based on the reasonableness of petitioner’s request, the undersigned 

GRANTS petitioner’s motion for attorneys’ fees and costs. 

Accordingly, the undersigned awards the total of $12,398.483 as a lump 

sum in the form of a check jointly payable to petitioner and petitioner’s counsel 

Jeffrey S. Pop. 

 The clerk of the court shall enter judgment in accordance herewith.4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey

 Nora Beth Dorsey

 Chief Special Master

 

3 This amount is intended to cover all legal expenses incurred in this matter. This award encompasses all 

charges by the attorney against a client, “advanced costs” as well as fees for legal services rendered. 

Furthermore, § 15(e)(3) prevents an attorney from charging or collecting fees (including costs) that would 

be in addition to the amount awarded herein. See generally Beck v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs.,

924 F.2d 1029 (Fed. Cir.1991).

4 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice 

renouncing the right to seek review.