alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 580 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                  House Calendar No. 94
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 580

                          [Report No. 115-369]

 Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the concurrent 
resolution (H. Con. Res. 71) establishing the congressional budget for 
the United States Government for fiscal year 2018 and setting forth the 
    appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2019 through 2027.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 24, 2017

   Mr. Woodall, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the concurrent 
resolution (H. Con. Res. 71) establishing the congressional budget for 
the United States Government for fiscal year 2018 and setting forth the 
    appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2019 through 2027.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to take from the Speaker's table the concurrent resolution (H. 
Con. Res. 71) establishing the congressional budget for the United 
States Government for fiscal year 2018 and setting forth the 
appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2019 through 2027, with 
the Senate amendment thereto, and to consider in the House, without 
intervention of any point of order, a motion offered by the chair of 
the Committee on the Budget or her designee that the House concur in 
the Senate amendment. The Senate amendment and the motion shall be 
considered as read. The motion shall be debatable for one hour equally 
divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the 
Committee on the Budget. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the motion to adoption without intervening motion.
                                                  House Calendar No. 94

115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 580

                          [Report No. 115-369]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the concurrent 
resolution (H. Con. Res. 71) establishing the congressional budget for 
the United States Government for fiscal year 2018 and setting forth the 
    appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2019 through 2027.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 24, 2017

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
#### Marylou Kresch et al., Respondents, v Suanne Saul et al., Appellants.

[816 NYS2d 147]

*864In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Parga, J.), dated January 12, 2005, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 to set aside a jury verdict in favor of the defendants and against them as against the weight of the evidence and for a new trial on the issue of damages.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

On this appeal from an order granting the plaintiffs’ motion to set aside a jury verdict in favor of the defendants and against them and for a new trial on the issue of damages, the defendants claim only that the Supreme Court should not have entertained the motion as it was untimely. We disagree. “A motion on notice is made when a notice of the motion or an order to show cause is served” (CPLR 2211; *see Russo v Eveco Dev. Corp.,*256 AD2d 566, 566 [1998]). Service upon a party’s attorney by mail “shall be complete upon mailing” (CPLR 2103 [b] [2]). “ ‘Mailing’ means the deposit of a paper enclosed in a first class postpaid wrapper, addressed to the address designated by a person for that purpose or, if none is designated, at that person’s last known address, in a post office or official depository under the exclusive care and custody of the United States Postal Service within the state” (CPLR 2103 [f] [1]).

Here, an affidavit of service established that the plaintiffs’ motion was served on the defendants on December 9, 2004 *(see*CPLR 2103 [b] [2]). Contrary to the defendants’ contention, the postmark dated December 11, 2004, on the envelope in which they received the motion did not establish that service was not completed on December 9, 2004 *(see*CPLR 2103 [b] [2]; [f] [1]; *Kings Park Classroom Teachers Assn. v Kings Park Cent. School Dist.,*63 NY2d 742, 742 [1984]). Notwithstanding the Supreme Court’s conflicting instructions that the plaintiffs had until December 8, 2004, by which to make their motion and that they had 30 days from November 10, 2004, within which to make their motion, we conclude that their motion, made on December 9, 2004 *(see*CPLR 2211), which was within 30 days from November 10, 2004 *(see*General Construction Law § 20), was timely. Schmidt, J.P., Crane, Spolzino and Covello, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


         In connection with the accompanying amended Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB of Velocity Asset Management Inc. for the three months ended September
30, 2004, I, John C. Kleinert, Chief Executive Officer of Velocity Asset
Management, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) such amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the three
months ended September 30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) the information contained in such amended Quarterly Report
on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended September 30, 2004, fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Velocity Asset Management, Inc.

                                        /s/ JOHN C. KLEINERT
                                        --------------------------------------
                                        John C. Kleinert
                                        Chief Executive Officer


         August 10, 2005



                                       27
# Case Reports

Join the MSPB Decisions Listserv
Return to top

-  About MSPB 
- Accessibility
-  Budget and Performance 
-  FOIA 
-  Info Quality Standards
-  No FEAR Act 
-  Office of the Inspector General 
-  Privacy Program 
-  Technical Support 
-  USA.gov 
-  OSC.gov 
-  Vote.gov

### U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board

### Agency Contact Center

(202) 653-7200

mspb@mspb.gov
<PAGE>   1
    Exhibit
      No.              Title
      ---              -----

      11               COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


                           National Datacomputer, Inc.
          Statement recomputation of net income (loss) per common share


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             -----------     -----------
                                                               June 30,        June 29,
                                                                 1998            1997
                                                             -----------     -----------
<S>                                                          <C>             <C>         
Net loss, as reported                                        $  (438,374)    $  (837,216)

Preferred stock preference items:

Discount inherent in conversion terms of Series C and D
     convertible preferred stock upon issuance                   (46,602)             --

Warrant                                                         (214,000)             --

Interest on Series B, C and D convertible preferred stock       (205,500)       (199,250)
                                                             -----------     -----------

Total preferred stock preference item                           (466,102)       (199,250)

Net loss attributable to common stockholders                 $  (904,476)    $(1,036,466)
                                                             -----------     -----------

Weighted average shares outstanding                            1,771,383       1,262,266
                                                             ===========     ===========

Net loss  per share                                          $     (0.51)    $     (0.82)
                                                             ===========     ===========
</TABLE>

Note: Due to the Company's net loss, no exercises of options or conversions or
      preferred stock have been assumed, all such items would be anti-dilutive.
§ 71.51 Additional requirements for Type B packages. ( a ) A Type B package, in addition to satisfying the requirements of §§ 71.41 through 71.47, must be designed, constructed, and prepared for shipment so that under the tests specified in: ( 1 ) Section 71.71 (“Normal conditions of transport”), there would be no loss or dispersal of radioactive contents—as demonstrated to a sensitivity of 10−6 A2 per hour, no significant increase in external surface radiation levels, and no substantial reduction in the effectiveness of the packaging; and
( 2 ) Section 71.73 (“Hypothetical accident conditions”), there would be no escape of krypton-85 exceeding 10 A2 in 1 week, no escape of other radioactive material exceeding a total amount A2 in 1 week, and no external radiation dose rate exceeding 10 mSv/h (1 rem/h) at 1 m (40 in) from the external surface of the package.
( b ) Where mixtures of different radionuclides are present, the provisions of appendix A, paragraph IV of this part shall apply, except that for Krypton-85, an effective A2 value equal to 10 A2 may be used.
( c ) Compliance with the permitted activity release limits of paragraph (a) of this section may not depend on filters or on a mechanical cooling system.
( d ) For packages which contain radioactive contents with activity greater than 105 A2, the requirements of § 71.61 must be met.
[60 FR 50264, Sept. 28, 1995, as amended at 69 FR 3794, Jan. 26, 2004; 69 FR 58039, Sept. 29, 2004]
CDC’S RESPONSE TO ZIKA

WHAT WE KNOW

AND WHAT 

WE DON’T 

KNOW.

What we know

Zika can be passed 

from a pregnant 

woman to her fetus.

Infection during 

pregnancy can cause 

certain birth defects.

Zika is spread mostly by the 

bite of an infected Aedes

species mosquito. 

These mosquitoes are 

aggressive daytime biters.

They can also bite at night. 

Zika is not currently found in the 

continental US. The mosquitoes 

that can carry Zika are found in 

some areas of the US.

Because the mosquitoes 

that spread Zika virus are 

found throughout the tropics, 

outbreaks will likely continue.

There is no vaccine or 

medicine for Zika.

What we don’t know

If there’s a safe time during 

your pregnancy to travel to 

an area with Zika

If you do travel and are bitten

• How likely you are to get Zika

• How likely it is that your baby will have 

birth defects from the infection

For more information: 

www.cdc.gov/zika

April 28, 2016 

CS263014D
H. Res. 1063 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

December 21, 2018. 

Whereas Abraham Lincoln was elected to the House of Representatives in 1846 to represent the 7th Congressional 

District of Illinois in the Thirtieth Congress from March 

1847 to March 1849; 

Whereas Abraham Lincoln served the people for 15 years as 

a State Legislator, Member of Congress, and President 

of the United States; 

Whereas Abraham Lincoln was a member of the Illinois General Assembly for four terms and was respected as an effective leader of his party and a popular campaigner; 

Whereas during Congressman Lincoln’s tenure, the room now 

designated as room H–226 of the United States Capitol 

was used as the post office of the House, where he spent 

almost every morning exchanging stories near the fireplace; 

Whereas the old post office space was just steps away from 

Congressman Lincoln’s desk, where he worked and voted 

and is now marked by a gold plaque on the floor of Statuary Hall; 

Whereas Congressman Lincoln was known to be the champion story-teller of the Capitol, having an endless repertoire of tales; 
2 

•HRES 1063 EH 

Whereas Abraham Lincoln was one of America’s greatest 

presidents, whose life was a story of adversity, perseverance, and leadership; and 

Whereas when the United States was at its darkest hour, 

Abraham Lincoln fought to end slavery and brought the 

country back together: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That room H–226 of the United States Capitol 

is designated as the ‘‘Lincoln Room’’. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
#### § 1800.5 Publication.

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 75948, Sept. 17, 2024.

The official site for accessing the NASA grant and cooperative agreement policies, including notices, internal guidance, certifications, the NASA Grant and Cooperative Agreement Manual (GCAM), and other source information is on the internet at: *https://prod.nais.nasa.gov/pub/pub_library/srba/index.html.*

[85 FR 71816, Nov. 12, 2020]
#### § 2867.137 Who in the Department of Justice may grant an exception to let an excluded person participate in a covered transaction?

Within the Department of Justice, the Attorney General or designee has the authority to grant an exception to let an excluded person participate in a covered transaction, as provided in the OMB guidance at 2 CFR 180.135.
Twin Cities Development Association, Inc. 

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 

October 24, 2014 

Mr. Michael Martin 

US Dept. of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: ESA bid for Scottsbluff, NE 

Mr. Martin, 

,.i" .. " 

~ ...... ,) 

•·.,.<' 

•. ,.. .. : i 

;- ·· ... 

... ··-··· 

·~ , ... ···.. .. 

I am the director of Economic Development for Twin Cities Development Association. We represent the 

communities of Scottsbluff and Gering, all of Scotts Bluff County and several rural communities in the 

surrounding the area. Reliable air service is of essential importance for us to grow the community and 

serve our area business (as well as residents that live in the community). We have had growing 

concerns over the lack of reliable air service with the current ESA contract the airport has with Great 

Lakes. We often hear from our business community complaints about the current provider. Many only 

fly if they have the luxury of missing a meeting or being a day late ..... because it happens all too often. 

I was in attendance at the board meeting of the Airport Authority for the purpose of considering the EAS 

bids. I am in support of the board's vote and decision to support Aerodynamics, Inc. (AD I) for the EAS 

bid for next year. We need reliable service and will not be able to effectively market and grow the 

community without it. 

For the future economic development of the community, it is imperative that the EAS contract be given 

to a new company that can provide reliable service at an affordable price. ADI company representatives 

seem very willing and interested in being a long term partner with the community and they will strive to 

provide a service that can be counted on. 

Please consider award of the EAS bid for the Scottsbluff to Denver route to AD I. 

Thank you for your consideration. 

Rawnda R. Pierce 

Executive Director 

1620 Broadway • Scottsbluff, NE 69361 

Phone 308-632-2833 • Fax 308-633-2854 

Websites: www.tcdne.org 

www.wehavejobs.net
#### § 1880.332 What methods must I use to pass requirements down to participants at lower tiers with whom I intend to do business?

You as a participant must include a term or condition in lower-tier transactions requiring lower-tier participants to comply with subpart C of the OMB guidance in 2 CFR part 180, as supplemented by this subpart.
Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Final 

Mercury and Air Toxics Standards
Abatement Order filed March 31, 2020.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 19

- 00469

- CV

____________ AZHAR M. CHAUDHARY , Appellant

V.

WENSHAN ZHANG , Appellee

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 5

Fort Bend County , Te xas Trial Court Cause No. 19

- CCV

- 064611



### ABATEMENT ORDER

This appeal is from a judgment signed May 31, 2019. Appellant filed a notice of appeal on June 12, 2019. Appellant filed a Statement of Inability to Afford Payment of Court Costs in the trial court . “A party who files a Statement of Inability to Afford Pay ment of Court Costs cannot be required to pay costs except by order of the court as provided by this rule.” See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145(a). The clerks’ record filed January 2, 2020 , did not contain a c ontest to appell ant ’ s statement and did not reflect that appellant has been ordered to pay costs pursuant
to Rule 145.Accordin gly, o n February 4, 2020, the official court reporter for the 234th

District Court was directed to file the reporter’s record by March 5, 2020

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. On March 3, 2020, the court reporter filed an information sheet
which state s a contest of inability to afford payment of court costs was set for a hearing on October 17, 2 019, but appellant moved for a continuance. On March 5, 2020, appellant filed a mot ion for extension of time to file the r e porter ’ s record. Appellant ’ s motion states the court reporter filed a cont est on October 8, 2019,

“ which is pending in the trial court. ” Accordingly, we abate this appeal and d irect the judge of County Court at
Law No. 5 to conduct a hearing on the con test filed by the court repor ter to appellant ’ s statement of inability to afford payment of court costs. See Tex. R. Civ.
P. 145 (f). We order the court to prepare a record, in the form of a reporter’s record, of the hearing. The judge shall order the trial clerk to forward to this court a supplemental clerk ’s record containing the trial court ’ s findings, any rulings, and/or any orders on the contest

. See id. The hearing record and supplemental
clerk’s record shall be filed with the clerk of this court within 45 days of the date
of this order.
The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from t his court’s active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s act ive docket when the hearing record and supplemental clerk ’ s records a re filed in this court. The court will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either

p arty, or the court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion.

PE R CURIAM Panel c onsists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jewell and Spain.
# EUR-Lex - 31986D0390 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31986D0390

**86/390/EEC: Commission Decision of 23 July 1986 amending Decision 83/423/EEC as regards the list of establishments in Paraguay approved for the purpose of importing fresh meat into the Community **

*
Official Journal L 228 , 14/08/1986 P. 0039 - 0040 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 21 P. 0238 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 21 P. 0238 *

*****

COMMISSION DECISION

of 23 July 1986

amending Decision 83/423/EEC as regards the list of establishments in Paraguay approved for the purpose of importing fresh meat into the Community

(86/390/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 72/462/EEC of 12 December 1972 on health and veterinary inspection problems upon importation of bovine animals and swine and fresh meat from third countries (1), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 3768/85 (2), and in particular Articles 4 (1) and 18 (1) thereof,

Whereas a list of establishments in Paraguay, approved for the purpose of importing fresh meat into the Community, was drawn up initially by Commission Decision 83/423/EEC (3), as last amended by Decision 84/578/EEC (4);

Whereas a routine inspection under Article 5 of Directive 72/462/EEC and Article 3 (1) of Commission Decision 83/196/EEC of 8 April 1983 concerning on-the-spot inspections to be carried out in respect of the importation of bovine animals and swine and fresh meat from non-member countries (5) has revealed that the level of hygiene of certain establishments has altered since the last inspection;

Whereas the list of establishments should therefore be amended;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Annex to Decision 83/423/EEC is hereby replaced by the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 23 July 1986.

For the Commission

Frans ANDRIESSEN

Vice-President

(1) OJ No L 302, 31. 12. 1972, p. 28.

(2) OJ No L 362, 31. 12. 1985, p. 8.

(3) OJ No L 238, 27. 8. 1983, p. 39.

(4) OJ No L 315, 5. 12. 1984, p. 28.

(5) OJ No L 108, 26. 4. 1983, p. 18.

ANNEX

LIST OF ESTABLISHMENTS FROM WHICH FRESH MEAT MAY BE INTRODUCED INTO THE TERRITORY OF THE COMMUNITY ONLY UNTIL THE STATED DATE

// // // // Number

// Establishment

// Address

// 1,3 // BOVINE MEAT Slaughterhouses and cutting premises // // 1.2.3 // // // // 5 (1) // Compañia de Desarollo Ganadero SA (CODEGA) // Tablada Nueva // 17 (2) // Compañia Industrial y Ganadera Guarani SA // Fernando de la Mora // // //

(1) Until 30 January 1987.

(2) Until 29 August 1986.