alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
ART. 5 FDS FOR QUARTER 10-Q
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000813040
<NAME> Greyhound Lines Inc.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,312
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,160
<ALLOWANCES>                                       234
<INVENTORY>                                      3,798
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                64,281
<PP&E>                                         426,379
<DEPRECIATION>                                 112,036
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 513,279
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           98,075
<BONDS>                                        215,756
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     60,000
<COMMON>                                           592
<OTHER-SE>                                      92,817
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   513,279
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               342,678
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  252,663
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,112
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (20,851)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       165
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (21,016)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 25,323
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (47,402)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.81)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.81)
        

</TABLE>
# EUR-Lex - 31992R1340 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31992R1340

**Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1340/92 of 22 May 1992 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature **

*
Official Journal L 145 , 27/05/1992 P. 0013 - 0014 Finnish special edition: Chapter 2 Volume 8 P. 0126 Swedish special edition: Chapter 2 Volume 8 P. 0126 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EEC) No 1340/92 of 22 May 1992 concerning the classification of certain goods in the combined nomenclature

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 (1) on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, as last amended by on (EEC) No 1039/92 (2), and in particular Article 9,

Whereas in order to ensure uniform application of the combined nomenclature annexed to the said Regulation, it is necessary to adopt measures concerning the classification of the good referred to in the Annex to this Regulation;

Whereas Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 has set down the general rules for the interpretation of the combined nomenclature and these rules also apply to any other nomenclature which is wholly orpartly based on it or which adds any additional subdivisions to it and which is established by specific Community provisions, with a view to the application of tariff or other mesures relating to trade in goods;

Whereas, pursuant to the said general rules, the goods described in column 1 of the table annexed to the present Regulation must be classified under the appropriate CN code indicated in column 2, by virtue of the reasons set out in column 3;

Whereas the nomenclature committee has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by its chairman,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The good described in column 1 of the annexed table are now classified within the combined nomenclature under the appropriate CN code indicated in column 2 of the said table.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 21st day after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities. This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 May 1992. For the Commission

Christiane SCRIVENER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 256, 7. 9. 1987, p. 1. (2) OJ No L 110, 28. 4. 1992, p. 42.

ANNEX

Description of goods Classification CN Code Reasons (1) (2) (3) Keracyanin (DCI) 2938 90 90 Classification is determined by the provisions of general rules 1 and 6 for the interpretation of the combined nomenclature and by the wording of CN codes 2938, 2938 90 and 2938 90 90
**Exhibit 32.1**

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofCalgon Carbon Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for theperiod ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John S. Stanik, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of myknowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

(2)  The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company for the periods presentedtherein.

| /s/ John S.   Stanik      |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
|                           |   |
| Chief   Executive Officer |   |
| November 28,   2006       |   |

This certification accompanies thisReport pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filedby the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended.

----
From: Richard S Vickery < Richard.S.Vickery- 1@USA.dupont.com >

To: Bill Neuffer/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: John A Dege <John.A.Dege@usa.dupont.com > Date: 01/17/2012 02:24 PM Subject: DuPont Nitric Acid Plant NOx Data - Beaumont

Bill, Attached is data concerning NOx emissions from the DuPont Beaumont nitric acid plant. It is a small, single - pressure p lant with NSCR control. Please note that the CEM NOx data for this plant, and that submitted yesterday for Pascagoula, contain data associated with periodic CEM QA/QC activities such as calibrations. Please let me know if you have any questions or commen ts. Regards, Rick (See attached file: Beaumont NOx.xls)(See attached file: DuPont Beaumont Data Sheet.doc)

========================================== Richard S. Vickery, P.E. Air Quality Consultant DuPont Engineering Research and Technology (DuET) DuPon t Building - D12036 - 1 1007 Market Street Wilmington, DE 19898 (302)774 - 9829 richard.s.vickery - 1@usa.dupont.com This communication is for use by the intended recipient and contains information that may be Privileged, confidential or copyrighted under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby formally notified that any use, copying or distribution of this e - mail, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. Please notify th e sender by return e -mail and delete this e - mail from your system. Unless explicitly and conspicuously designated as "E - Contract Intended", this e - mail does not constitute a contract offer, a contract amendment, or an acceptance of a contract offer. This e -mail does not constitute a consent to the use of sender's contact information for direct marketing purposes or for transfers of data to third parties. Francais Deutsch Italiano Espanol Portugues Japanese Chinese Korean

http://www.DuPont.com/corp/email_disclaimer.html
EX-35.12


(logo)  WELLS FARGO

Commercial Mortgage Servicing
D1086-120, 12th Floor
550 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 282022
1-800-326-1334

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated
as of March 1, 2013, by and among DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING
CORPORATION, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master
Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer, U.S.
BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, and DEUTSCHE BANK AND TRUST COMPANY
AMERICAS, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, with
respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2013-CCRE6
(the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall
have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 3.29 of this Agreement, I, Lea Land, Director of Commercial
Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

1. A review of the activities of the Special Servicer during the period from
   March 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013 (the "Reporting Period"), and of
   its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under
   my supervision, and

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer, has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
throughout the Reporting Period.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the
13th day of March 2014.

/s/ Lea Land
Lea Land, Director
Wells Fargo Bank

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Together we'll go far
#### § 708.1 Scope and purpose.

This part provides procedures for processing complaints by employees of DOE contractors alleging retaliation by their employers for disclosure of information concerning danger to public or worker health or safety, substantial violations of law, or gross mismanagement; for participation in Congressional proceedings; or for refusal to participate in dangerous activities.
§ 960.4-2-3 Rock characteristics. ( a ) *Qualifying condition.* The present and expected characteristics of the host rock and surrounding units shall be capable of accommodating the thermal, chemical, mechanical, and radiation stresses expected to be induced by repository construction, operation, and closure and by expected interactions among the waste, host rock, ground water, and engineered components. The characteristics of and the processes operating within the geologic setting shall permit compliance with ( 1 ) the requirements specified in § 960.4-1 for radionuclide releases to the accessible environment and
( 2 ) the requirements set forth in 10 CFR 60.113 for radionuclide releases from the engineered-barrier system using reasonably available technology.
( b ) *Favorable Conditions.* ( 1 ) A host rock that is sufficiently thick and laterally extensive to allow significant flexibility in selecting the depth, configuration, and location of the underground facility to ensure isolation.
( 2 ) A host rock with a high thermal conductivity, a low coefficient of thermal expansion, or sufficient ductility to seal fractures induced by repository construction, operation, or closure or by interactions among the waste, host rock, ground water, and engineered components.
( c ) *Potentially adverse conditions.* ( 1 ) Rock conditions that could require engineering measures beyond reasonably available technology for the construction, operation, and closure of the repository, if such measures are necessary to ensure waste containment or isolation.
( 2 ) Potential for such phenomena as thermally induced fractures, the hydration or dehydration of mineral components, brine migration, or other physical, chemical, or radiation-related phenomena that could be expected to affect waste containment or isolation.
( 3 ) A combination of geologic structure, geochemical and thermal properties, and hydrologic conditions in the host rock and surrounding units such that the heat generated by the waste could significantly decrease the isolation provided by the host rock as compared with pre-waste-emplacement conditions.
1 

### Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 9:19 AM

To: 'veteransfoundationfl@gmail.com'

Cc: '333exemptions@faa.gov' Subject: Request for Additional Information: Veterans Helping Veterans (FAA-2015-0520)



### July 30, 2015

Dear Mr. Norvaisas:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2015-0520). This information is necessary for the Fe deral Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Describe the aircraft make(s), m odel(s), and type(s)(i.e. - fixed-wing, rotorcraft, lighter-than-air) for the proposed UAS operation. The description(s) sh ould include the maximum weight (including payload). This information can be located in the aircraft manual(s).

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Hea dquarters or electronically via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov . If you want us to process your request a ny further, we must receive the information described above by August 13, 2015. If we do not receiv e the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

Nia Daniels, ARM

‐ 108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075 nia.daniels@faa.gov
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 885 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 885

  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding our 
                             national debt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 9, 2018

 Mr. Norman submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding our 
                             national debt.

Whereas our national debt exceeds $20 trillion;
Whereas each citizen of the United States would owe over $63,000 to pay off the 
        national debt if they were forced to pay out-of-pocket;
Whereas the national debt is expected to exceed $30 trillion within the next 
        decade;
Whereas when the national debt continues to grow at an alarming rate, the 
        probability of a fiscal crisis increases;
Whereas financial waste and inefficiencies are prevalent in the Federal 
        Government, illustrated by more than 250 areas identified in past 
        Government Accountability Office reports where reforms are needed to 
        reduce duplication and overlap;
Whereas agencies have Office of Inspector Generals and the Government 
        Accountability Office exists in order to monitor Federal spending and 
        identify areas of waste and inefficiency;
Whereas each Member of Congress is elected by, and works for, their constituents 
        who pay taxes;
Whereas each Member is elected to ensure that taxpayers' dollars are used 
        responsibly;
Whereas Congress has the fundamental responsibility to efficiently utilize the 
        power of the purse; and
Whereas the House should find budgetary savings of at least $40 billion each 
        fiscal year: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) believes the national debt is rising unsustainably and 
        needs to urgently be addressed; and
            (2) encourages each Member of the House of Representatives 
        to introduce and advocate for legislation to find at least $100 
        million of Federal programs to cut spending from each fiscal 
        year, aside from annual Appropriations bills.
                                 <all>
```
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 893 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that any reauthorization 

of the Ryan White CARE Act of 1990 should not impose catastrophic 

losses in funding for States with the highest prevalence of HIV/AIDS, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 26, 2006 

Mr. TOWNS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

any reauthorization of the Ryan White CARE Act of 

1990 should not impose catastrophic losses in funding 

for States with the highest prevalence of HIV/AIDS, 

and for other purposes. 

Whereas full Federal funding should be authorized and appropriated to meet the needs of all persons living with 

AIDS and those persons living with HIV to ensure full 

access to a continuum of care; 

Whereas good Federal fiscal principles and policies should 

not create disincentives for States to contribute their own 

resources to maintain the health, safety, and welfare of 

their populations; and 


HMOORE on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•HRES 893 IH 

Whereas States with the highest prevalence of HIV/AIDS 

should not incur serious losses in funding in any reauthorization of the Ryan White CARE Act of 1990: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that— 

3 (1) full Federal funding should be authorized 

4 and appropriated for all States to continue the bat5 tle against the HIV/AIDS epidemic; and 

6 (2) any reauthorization of the Ryan White 

7 CARE Act of 1990 should not impose catastrophic 

8 losses in funding for States with the highest preva9 lence of HIV/AIDS. 

Æ 


HMOORE on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
Case 2:06-cv-00785-MHT-WC Document 31 Filed 05/30/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00785-MHT-WC Document 31 Filed 05/30/2007 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-4604

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DONTE LEE SMITH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, 

District Judge. (1:14-cr-00017-CCE-1)

Submitted: February 25, 2015 Decided: March 3, 2015

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Louis C. Allen, Federal Public Defender, Tiffany T. Jefferson, 

Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greensboro, North Carolina, 

for Appellant. Kyle David Pousson, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Donte Lee Smith appeals his eighty-month sentence 

imposed after he pled guilty pursuant to a plea agreement to 

possession of ammunition by a felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 

§§ 922(g)(1), 924(a)(2) (2012). In accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Smith’s counsel filed a brief 

certifying that there are no meritorious grounds for appeal, but 

questioning whether Smith’s sentence is substantively 

reasonable. Although notified of his right to do so, Smith has 

not filed a pro se supplemental brief, and the Government has 

declined to file a responsive brief. Finding no error, we 

affirm.

We review the district court’s sentence, “whether 

inside, just outside, or significantly outside the Guidelines 

range[,] under a deferential abuse-of-discretion standard.” 

Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 41 (2007). In reviewing a 

sentence for substantive reasonableness, we “examine[] the 

totality of the circumstances,” and, if the sentence is within 

the properly calculated Guidelines range, we presume on appeal 

that the sentence is substantively reasonable. United States v. 

Mendoza–Mendoza, 597 F.3d 212, 216–17 (4th Cir. 2010). “Such a 

presumption can only be rebutted by showing that the sentence is 

unreasonable when measured against the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) 

[(2012)] factors.” United States v. Louthian, 756 F.3d 295, 306 
3

(4th Cir.) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 135 S. Ct. 421 

(2014). Smith has failed to rebut the presumption of 

reasonableness this court affords his within-Guidelines 

sentence. 

In accordance with Anders, we have reviewed the entire 

record and have found no meritorious grounds for appeal. We 

therefore affirm the district court’s judgment. This court 

requires that counsel inform Smith, in writing, of his right to 

petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further 

review. If Smith requests that a petition be filed, but counsel 

believes that such a petition would be frivolous, counsel may 

move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. 

Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on 

Smith. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>
                                                                EXHIBIT 99.2

                            STRATEX NETWORKS, INC.

                   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the periodic report of Stratex Networks, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Carl A. Thomsen,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof,
solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States
Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

        (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
        or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

        (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
        the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.





Date: February 14, 2003                         /s/ Carl A. Thomsen
                                                -----------------------
                                                Carl A. Thomsen
                                                Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

The undersigned officer of First National Lincoln Corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 to which this certification is being furnished as an exhibit (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K ("Item 601(b)(32)") promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and the Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), thiscertification (A) shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

 

Date: May 9, 2005

 

/s/ Daniel R. Daigneault

Daniel R. Daigneault

President & Chief Executive Officer

First National Lincoln Corporation