alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 2 (Tuesday, January 4, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 294-295]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-33088]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

15 CFR Part 922

[0908041219-0073-02]
RIN 0648-AX79

Amendments to National Marine Sanctuary Regulations Regarding Low 
Overflights in Designated Zones

AGENCY: Office of National Marine Sanctuaries (ONMS), National Oceanic 
and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Department of Commerce (DOC).

ACTION: Extension of public comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On December 8, 2010, NOAA published a proposed rule in the 
Federal Register to amend the low overflight regulations of the Channel 
Islands, Monterey Bay, Gulf of the Farallones, and Olympic Coast 
national marine sanctuaries. Specifically, NOAA proposes to amend the 
regulations requiring that motorized aircraft maintain certain minimum 
altitudes above specified locations within the boundaries of the listed 
sanctuaries; and state that failure to comply with these altitude 
limits is presumed to disturb marine mammals or seabirds and is a 
violation of the sanctuary regulations.

DATES: The public comment period on the proposed rule published at 75 
FR 76319, December 8, 2010, will be extended an additional 30 days from 
the original due date of January 7, 2011. Comments will be accepted 
through February 7, 2011.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by RIN 0648-AX79 by any 
one of the following methods:
     Electronic Submissions: Submit all electronic public 
comments via the Federal eRulemaking Portal http://www.regulations.gov.
     Mail: Debra Malek, Office of National Marine Sanctuaries, 
1305 East-West Highway, 11th floor, Silver Spring, MD 20910.
    Instructions: No comments will be posted for public viewing until 
after the comment period has closed. All comments received are a part 
of the public record and will be posted to http://www.regulations.gov 
without change. All Personal Identifying Information (for example, 
name, address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by the commenter may be 
publicly accessible. Do not submit confidential business information or 
otherwise sensitive or protected information.

[[Page 295]]

    ONMS will accept anonymous comments (enter N/A in the required 
fields if you wish to remain anonymous). Attachments to electronic 
comments will be accepted in Microsoft Word, Excel, Wordperfect, or 
Adobe PDF file formats only.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Debra Malek, Office of National Marine 
Sanctuaries, 1305 East-West Highway, 11th floor, Silver Spring, MD 
20910, (301) 713-3125 Ext. 262.

Daniel J. Basta,
Director, Office of National Marine Sanctuaries.
[FR Doc. 2010-33088 Filed 1-3-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-NK-M
```
```

[108th Congress Public Law 239]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ239.108]

[[Page 118 STAT. 673]]

Public Law 108-239
108th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  3751 West 6th Street in Los Angeles, California, as the ``Dosan Ahn 
     Chang Ho Post Office''. <<NOTE: June 25, 2004 -  [H.R. 1822]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 3751 
West 6th Street in Los Angeles, California, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Dosan Ahn Chang Ho Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Dosan Ahn Chang Ho Post 
Office''.

    Approved June 25, 2004.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 1822:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):
            Apr. 20, considered and passed House.
            June 9, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
#### § 417.525 Whom do I ask if I have questions about a person in SAM Exclusions?

If you have questions about a listed person in SAM Exclusions, ask the point of contact for the Federal agency that placed the person's name into SAM Exclusions. You may find the agency point of contact from SAM Exclusions.
# EUR-Lex - 31991D0664 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31991D0664

**91/664/EEC: Council Decision of 11 December 1991 designating the Community reference laboratories for testing certain substances for residues **

*
Official Journal L 368 , 31/12/1991 P. 0017 - 0018 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 39 P. 0258 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 39 P. 0258 *

COUNCIL DECISION

of 11 December 1991

designating the Community reference laboratories for testing certain substances for residues

(91/664/EEC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 86/469/EEC of 16 September 1986 concerning the examination of animals and fresh meat for the presence of residues (1), and in particular Article 8 (2) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Whereas coordination between the national reference laboratories responsible in the Member States for the examination of animals and their meat for the presence of residues must be assigned to highly specialized laboratories possessing the installations and equipment necessary for this type of analysis;

Whereas the Council, in its Decision 89/187/EEC (2), determined the powers and conditions of operation of the Community reference laboratories provided for in Directive 86/469/EEC;

Whereas, in accordance with Article 8 (2) of Directive 86/469/EEC, it is important to designate at this point the Community reference laboratories for testing certain substances for residues,

Whereas reference laboratories are eligible for Community aid according to the conditions referred to in Article 28 of Council Decision 90/424/EEC of 26 June 1990 on expenditure in the veterinary field (3),

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following laboratories are hereby designated Community reference laboratories:

(a) for the residues included in Annex I, groups A. I and A. II, of Directive 86/469/EEC:

Rijksinstituut voor de Volksgezondheid en Milieuhygiene

Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9

NL-3720 Bilthoven;

(b)

for the residues included in Annex I, group A. III. (a), of Directive 86/469/EEC, with the exception of sulphonamides:

Laboratoire des Médicaments vétérinaires

(CNEVA-LMV)

La Haute Marché, Javené

F-35133 Fougères;

(c)

for the residues included in Annex I, group A.III. (b), of Directive 86/469/EEC, and the residues of beta-agonists and sulphonamides:

Bundesgesundheitsamt

Thielallee 88-92

D-1000 Berlin 33;

(d)

Directive 86/469/EEC:

Istituto Superiore di Sanità

via Regina Elena 299

I-00161 Roma.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 December 1991.

For the Council

The President

P. BUKMAN

(1) OJ N° L 275, 26. 9. 1986, p. 36.

(2) OJ N° L 66, 10. 3. 1989, p. 37.

(3) OJ N° L 224, 18. 8. 1990, p. 19.
EX-31 Rule
13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

I, Anthony
Sfarra, certify that:

1. I have
reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be
filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the WFRBS
Commercial Mortgage Trust 2013-C12 (the "Exchange Act periodic
reports");

2. Based on
my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;

3. Based on
my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required
to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is
included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on
my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report
under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act
periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the
servicing agreements in all material respects; and

5. All of the
reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance
with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in
this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act
Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except
as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the
certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by
the following unaffiliated parties:

National
Cooperative Bank, N.A. (successor to NCB, FSB), as NCB Master Servicer, Rialto
Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, National Cooperative Bank, N.A.
(successor to NCB, FSB), as Co-op Special Servicer, U.S. Bank National
Association, as Trustee, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Trust Advisor,
CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., as Servicing Function
Participant, National Tax Search, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant, and
Prudential Asset Resources, Inc., as Primary Servicer.

Dated: April
14, 2020

/s/ Anthony
Sfarra

President

(senior officer in charge
of securitization of the depositor)
#### § 1401.245 Federal agency or agency.

*Federal agency* or *agency* means any United States executive department, military department, government corporation, government controlled corporation, any other establishment in the executive branch (including the Executive Office of the President), or any independent regulatory agency.
§ 3513.137 Who in Ex-Im Bank may grant an exception to let an excluded person participate in a covered transaction? ( a ) The Ex-Im Bank agency head or designee may grant an exception permitting an excluded person to participate in a particular covered transacting. If the Ex-Im Bank agency head or designee grants an exception, the exception must be in writing and state the reason(s) for deviating from the government wide policy in Executive Order 12549.
( b ) An exception granted by one agency for an excluded person does not extend to the covered transactions of another agency.
[HIRSCH INTERNATIONAL CORP. LETTERHEAD]




                                                  July 25, 2006


MHM SIEBDRUCKMASCHINEN GMBH
Muhlgraben 43a
A-6343 Erl
Austria

                         Re:   Guaranty of Collection

Gentlemen:

     Reference is made to that certain Distribution Agreement (the "Distribution
Agreement") dated as of July 8, 2006 by and between MHM SIEBDRUCKMASCHINEN GMBH
("MHM") and HIRSCH DISTRIBUTION, INC. ("Distributor").  Pursuant to Section 9(b)
of the Distribution  Agreement,  Distributor may become obligated,  from time to
time, to pay MHM for Products (as defined in the Distribution Agreement) ordered
from MHM. As  additional  consideration  given to MHM for the  execution  of the
Distribution   Agreement  and  the  transactions   set  forth  therein,   Hirsch
International  Corp.  (the  "Company")  hereby  agrees to guaranty  the full and
prompt payment of all of Distributor's  obligations to pay for Products pursuant
to Section 9(b) of the Distribution  Agreement upon the Distributor's failure to
make timely payment of its obligations thereunder.  The Company agrees to pay on
demand all sums due or to become due to MHM from Distributor pursuant to Section
9(b) by reason of  Distributor's  failure to make timely payment under the terms
of the Distribution Agreement.


                                                Very truly yours,


                                                /s/ Paul Gallagher
                                                ------------------
                                                Paul Gallagher
                                                Chief Executor Officer
#### JOINTA LIME CO. v. GLENS FALLS MATCH CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

July 1, 1914.)

Action by the Jointa Lime Company against the Glens Falls Match Company.

No opinion. Motion to dismiss appeals granted, with $10 costs in each case.
Exhibit
      32.2 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Calgon Carbon Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Leroy M. Ball, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that **** to
      the
      best of my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods
      presented therein.





/s /
      Leroy
      M. Ball







Chief
      Financial Officer


November
      9, 2007







This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
§ 184.1 Purpose and policy. ( a ) *Purpose.* This part provides guidance to Federal awarding agencies on the implementation of the Buy America Preference applicable to Federal financial assistance set forth in part I of subtitle A, Buy America Sourcing Preferences, of the Build America, Buy America Act included in the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (Pub. L. 117-58) at division G, title IX, subtitle A, part I, sections 70911 through 70917.
( b ) *Policy.* The head of each Federal agency must ensure that none of the funds made available for a Federal award for an infrastructure project may be obligated unless all of the iron, steel, manufactured products, and construction materials incorporated into the project are produced in the United States. *See* section 70914(a) of the Build America Buy America Act.
Editorial Note on Part 100
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 100 appear at 81 FR 49895, July 29, 2016.

§ 100.100 Misleading containers. In accordance with section 403(d) of the act, a food shall be deemed to be misbranded if its container is so made, formed, or filled as to be misleading. ( a ) A container that does not allow the consumer to fully view its contents shall be considered to be filled as to be misleading if it contains nonfunctional slack-fill. Slack-fill is the difference between the actual capacity of a container and the volume of product contained therein. Nonfunctional slack-fill is the empty space in a package that is filled to less than its capacity for reasons other than: ( 1 ) Protection of the contents of the package;
( 2 ) The requirements of the machines used for enclosing the contents in such package;
( 3 ) Unavoidable product settling during shipping and handling;
( 4 ) The need for the package to perform a specific function (e.g., where packaging plays a role in the preparation or consumption of a food), where such function is inherent to the nature of the food and is clearly communicated to consumers;
( 5 ) The fact that the product consists of a food packaged in a reusable container where the container is part of the presentation of the food and has value which is both significant in proportion to the value of the product and independent of its function to hold the food, e.g., a gift product consisting of a food or foods combined with a container that is intended for further use after the food is consumed; or durable commemorative or promotional packages; or
( 6 ) Inability to increase level of fill or to further reduce the size of the package (e.g., where some minimum package size is necessary to accommodate required food labeling (excluding any vignettes or other nonmandatory designs or label information), discourage pilfering, facilitate handling, or accommodate tamper-resistant devices).
( b ) [Reserved]
[59 FR 537, Jan. 5, 1994]
§ 824.16 Direction to NNSA contractors. ( a ) Notwithstanding any other provision of this part, the NNSA Administrator, rather than the Director, signs, issues, serves, or takes the following actions that direct NNSA contractors or subcontractors. ( 1 ) Subpoenas;
( 2 ) Orders to compel attendance;
( 3 ) Disclosures of information or documents obtained during an investigation or inspection;
( 4 ) Preliminary notices of violation; and
( 5 ) Final notices of violations.
( b ) The Administrator shall act after consideration of the Director's recommendation. If the Administrator disagrees with the Director's recommendation, and the disagreement cannot be resolved by the two officials, the Director may refer the matter to the Deputy Secretary for resolution.
#### ZWIRZ, Respondent, v. MITCHELL et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 8, 1915.)

Action by Ernest Zwirz against John R. Mitchell and another.

No opinion. Judgment and order of the County Court of Kings County unanimously affirmed, with costs.
#### § 200.330 Reporting on real property.

The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity must require a non-Federal entity to submit reports at least annually on the status of real property in which the Federal Government retains an interest, unless the Federal interest in the real property extends 15 years or longer. In those instances where the Federal interest attached is for a period of 15 years or more, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity, at its option, may require the non-Federal entity to report at various multi-year frequencies (*e.g.,* every two years or every three years, not to exceed a five-year reporting period; or a Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may require annual reporting for the first three years of a Federal award and thereafter require reporting every five years).
CD-adapco – April 2011

Aerodynamics of Large Vehicles
CD-adapco – April 2011

Topics

• EPA Test Case

– Case Run:

• Yaw Angle: 0, 3, 6, 9, -3, -6, -9

• With and Without Trailer Fairings

• Speed: 55 mph

• Ground: Moving

• Environment: Open Road

Vehicle Aerodynamics 
CD-adapco – April 2011

Case Study

Vehicle Aerodynamics 
CD-adapco – April 2011

Case Study

Vehicle Aerodynamics 
CD-adapco – April 2011

Job Status

Vehicle Aerodynamics 
CD-adapco – April 2011

Prism Layer Modeling

Vehicle Aerodynamics 

Wall Y+ Range:

High Reynolds Region

• Target Y+: 30-300

– 2 Layers, 4mm Wide

– Near Wall ~ 1mm

• Trailer uses 20mm prism layer 

with 6 Layers to blend outward.

Low Reynolds Region

• Target Y+: < 5

– Minimum: 8 Layers

– Near Wall ~0.05mm

• Applied to CAB and tires (not 

treads grooves)
CD-adapco – April 2011

Parameterize Wake Refinement

(note: images may not reflect latest tables for half scale truck)

Be

st 

7 

Boundaries: All Surfaces

Size : 100 % base size

Distance : 2 Meters

Boundaries: Tires

Size : 50 %

Distance : .4 Meters
CD-adapco – April 2011

Process

Vehicle Aerodynamics 
CD-adapco – April 2011

Process

Vehicle Aerodynamics 
CD-adapco – April 2011

Gap Closure

Vehicle Aerodynamics 
CD-adapco – April 2011

Sample Results

Vehicle Aerodynamics 
CD-adapco – April 2011

Pressure Coefficient: 0 Degree Yaw

Vehicle Aerodynamics 
CD-adapco – April 2011

Pressure Coefficient: 0 Degree Yaw

Vehicle Aerodynamics 
CD-adapco – April 2011

Sample Results

Vehicle Aerodynamics 
CD-adapco – April 2011

Checking Turbulence Behavior

Turbulent Viscosity Ratio

• Turbulent Viscosity Ratio check

– Scale: 0-1000

– Checks:

• Use to check to see boundary layer growth looks correct

• Checks for proper settings on inlet

Vehicle Aerodynamics 
CD-adapco – April 2011

Hardware For Testing

Hardware

• 256 Processor Cluster Dedicated 

for Testing and Improving Vehicle 

Aerodynamics

– Head Node

• 64 Gbytes

• 1 Queue for Grid Generation

– Cluster Nodes

• 64 Nodes, with 2 dual core processors

• 12 Gbytes per node

Man power

– Limited resources

Vehicle Aerodynamics 
CD-adapco – April 2011

Aerodynamics Process Automation

STAR-CCM+ reading setup information directly from excel

• To adapt to the differences in imported CAD, grouping information, 

boundary conditions, etc are imported from an Excel spreadsheet.

– Starting point of each test case just starts with CAD data, and spreadsheet.

• Results are created as part of the analysis

– PowerPoint generated for each case ran.

Run: Mesh/Solve/Post Output: PowerPoint 

Input: Cad/Excel 

Run: Mesh/Solve/Post 

Ve

hi
CD-adapco – April 2011

Production Environment: Hardware

Ve

hi

Dual Queue

Job: Meshing

CPU Time: 6 

hours

Queue: 64 Nodes

Job: Solver

Elapsed: 28 hours

Queue: Part Of 

Solution

Job: Posting

Elapsed: 0.5 hours
§ 1108.405 Voluntary (committed or uncommitted) cost sharing. ( a ) *Voluntary cost sharing* means cost sharing that an entity pledges voluntarily in its application (*i.e.,* not due to a stated cost-sharing requirement in the notice of funding opportunity to which the entity's application responds).
( b ) *Voluntary committed cost sharing* means voluntary cost sharing that a DoD Component accepts through inclusion in the approved budget for the project or program and as a binding requirement of the terms and conditions of the award made to the entity in response to its application.
( c ) *Voluntary uncommitted cost sharing* means voluntary cost sharing that does not meet the criteria in paragraph (b) of this section.
#### In re VALENTINE.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 19, 1914.)

In the matter of Henry C. Valentine.

No opinion. Application granted. Order filed. See, also, 147 N. Y. Supp. 231.