alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 468 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                  House Calendar No. 67
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 468

                          [Report No. 115-252]

  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 111) 
  providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by Bureau of Consumer 
      Financial Protection relating to ``Arbitration Agreements''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 24, 2017

     Mr. Buck, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 111) 
  providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by Bureau of Consumer 
      Financial Protection relating to ``Arbitration Agreements''.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider in the House the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 111) 
providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by Bureau of Consumer 
Financial Protection relating to ``Arbitration Agreements''. All points 
of order against consideration of the joint resolution are waived. The 
joint resolution shall be considered as read. All points of order 
against provisions in the joint resolution are waived. The previous 
question shall be considered as ordered on the joint resolution and on 
any amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion 
except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the 
chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Financial 
Services; and (2) one motion to recommit.
                                                  House Calendar No. 67

115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 468

                          [Report No. 115-252]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 111) 
  providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by Bureau of Consumer 
      Financial Protection relating to ``Arbitration Agreements''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 24, 2017

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
§ 1.910 What training requirements apply to carriers engaged in transportation operations? ( a ) When the carrier and shipper have agreed in a written contract that the carrier is responsible, in whole or in part, for the sanitary conditions during transportation operations, the carrier must provide adequate training to personnel engaged in transportation operations that provides an awareness of potential food safety problems that may occur during food transportation, basic sanitary transportation practices to address those potential problems, and the responsibilities of the carrier under this part. The training must be provided upon hiring and as needed thereafter.
( b ) Carriers must establish and maintain records documenting the training described in paragraph (a) of this section. Such records must include the date of the training, the type of training, and the person(s) trained. These records are subject to the records requirements of § 1.912(c).
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Altair International
Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alan M. Smith, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|Date: August 12, 2015 |  | /s/ Alan M. Smith      
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                      |  | Alan M. Smith          
|                      |  | Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit
10.53


VORNADO
REALTY TRUST


AMENDMENT
NO. 2 TO VORNADO REALTY TRUST 2002 OMNIBUS SHARE PLAN


1.  Purpose
Of Amendment.


The Vornado Realty Trust
2002 Omnibus Share Plan, as previously amended effective March 17, 2006 (the “Plan”)
is hereby amended pursuant to Section 16 thereof to replace Section 15 (as such Sections were renumbered pursuant to
Amendment No. 1 to the Plan) thereof, in its entirety, with the
following:


“15.  Adjustment of and Changes in Shares.  In the event of any change in the outstanding
Shares by reason of any share dividend or split, recapitalization, merger,
consolidation, spinoff, combination or exchange of Shares or other corporate
change, or any distributions to common shareholders other than regular cash
dividends, the Committee or the Board of Trustees, respectively, shall make
such substitution or adjustment, if any, as it deems to be equitable, as to the
number or kind of Shares or other securities issued or reserved for issuance
pursuant to the Plan and to outstanding awards; provided, however, that no such
substitution or adjustment shall be required if the Committee or the Board of
Trustees determines that such action could cause an award to fail to satisfy
the conditions of an applicable exception from the requirements of Section 409A
of the Internal Revenue Code (“Section 409A) or otherwise could subject a
Participant to the additional tax impose under Section 409A in respect of an
outstanding award; and further provided that no Participant shall have the
right to require the Committee or the Board of Trustees to make any adjustment
or substitution under this Section 14 or have any claim or right whatsoever
against the Trust or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates or any of their
respective trustees, directors, officer or employees in respect of any action
taken or not taken under this Section 15.”


2.  No Shareholder Approval Required


Pursuant to Section 16
of the Plan, no shareholder approval of this amendment is required.


3.  No Other Changes


Except as expressly
provided herein, there are no other amendments or modifications to the Plan
other than all references to the Plan in the Plan or otherwise will mean 2002
Omnibus Share Plan as modified by Amendment No. 1 and Amendment No. 2 there to
(and as may hereafter be amended or modified from time to time in accordance
with the terms thereof).  The Plan
continues in full force and effect as so modified


4.  Effective Date


This amendment is
effective as of May 18, 2006, the date on which it was approved by the Board of
Trustees.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 33 (Friday, February 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 7536]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3257]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6898]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``The Dead Sea Scrolls: Words That Changed the World''

Summary: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 
of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of 
April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``The Dead Sea Scrolls: Words That Changed 
the World,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported 
pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I 
also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at 
the Science Museum of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, from on or about March 
12, 2010, until on or about October 24, 2010, and at possible 
additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the 
national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 0522-0505.

    Dated: February 12, 2010.
Maura M. Pally,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-3257 Filed 2-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 34 (Monday, February 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7636-7637]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3315]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration 12036 and 12037]

New Jersey Disaster NJ-00013

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of New Jersey (FEMA-
1873-DR), dated 02/05/2010.
    Incident: Snowstorm.
    Incident Period: 12/19/2009 through 12/20/2009.
    Effective Date: 02/05/2010.

[[Page 7637]]

    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 04/06/2010.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 11/05/2010.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 02/05/2010, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Atlantic, Burlington, Camden, Cumberland, Gloucester, 
Ocean, Salem.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere...      3.625
  Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere...      3.000
For Economic Injury:
  Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere...      3.000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 12036B 
and for economic injury is 12037B.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-3315 Filed 2-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
```
#### § 200.467 Selling and marketing costs.

Costs of selling and marketing any products or services of the non-Federal entity (unless allowed under § 200.421) are unallowable, except as direct costs, with prior approval by the Federal awarding agency when necessary for the performance of the Federal award.

[85 FR 49570, Aug. 13, 2020]
38386.

#### W. F. PRIOR COMPANY, INC. v. PILCHER.

Frankxjm, Judge.

“Where, under the terms of a contract, goods are to be shipped periodically in instalments to the purchaser until notice by the purchaser to discontinue further shipments, and where periodic shipments have been made by the seller under the terms of the contract, and the goods so shipped have been delivered to the business address of the purchaser . . . in periodic instalments ...” the purchaser is liable to the seller for payment for such goods until such date as he discontinues the purchase by giving notice to the seller. *Lawyers Cooperative Publishing Co. v. Middlebrooks,*40 Ga. App. 356 (149 S. E. 716). See *Electric Ry. Co. of Savannah v. Tennessee Coal &c. Ry. Co.,*98 Ga. 189 (26 S. E. 741).

Consequently, in this case the trial court erred in not granting the W. F. Prior Company, Inc.’s motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Gardner, P. J., Townsend, and Carlisle, JJ., concur.*

*78Decided July 11, 1960.

*Casey*Thigpen, for plaintiff in error.

*Carlton G. Matthews, Jr.,*contra.
EXHIBIT  11
                                                                     -------  --

                    COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (LOSS)

                           National Datacomputer, Inc.
          Statement recomputation of net income (loss) per common share


<TABLE><CAPTION>
                                                                            March 31,             March 31,
                                                                               2000                  1999
                                                                           -----------           -----------
<S>                                                                        <C>                   <C>
Net income (loss), as reported                                             $   104,287           $  (199,626)

Preferred stock preference items:

Discount inherent in conversion terms of Series F
        convertible preferred stock upon issuance                          $      --             $   (18,750)

Interest on Series B, C, D and F convertible preferred stock               $   (95,880)          $  (104,500)
                                                                           -----------           -----------

Total preferred stock preference item                                      $   (95,880)          $  (123,250)

Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders                      $     8,407           $  (322,876)

Weighted average shares outstanding:

A. Shares attributable to common stock outstanding                           4,128,018             2,537,859
B. Shares attributable to convertible preferred stock outstanding                 --                    --
C. Shares attributable to common stock options and warrants
        pursuant to APB 15, paragraph 38 (a)                                      --                    --
                                                                           -----------           -----------

Weighted average shares outstanding                                          4,128,018             2,537,859
                                                                           ===========           ===========

Net income (loss)  per share                                               $      0.00           $     (0.13)
                                                                           ===========           ===========
</TABLE>

Note:   Due to the Company's net loss, no exercises of options or conversions of
        preferred stock have been assumed, all such items would be
        anti-dilutive.
#### Maria C. BITTAR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AIR CANADA, a Corporation of Canada, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 74-3873

Summary Calendar.*

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 30, 1975.

Arthur Massey, Miami, Fla., for plaintiff-appellant.

Herbert B. Mintz, Miami, Fla., Sarino R. Costanzo, Miami, Fla., for defendantappellee.

Before WISDOM, BELL and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

*

Rule 18, 5th Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 431 F.2d 409, Part I (5th Cir. 1970).

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff, Maria C. Bittar, brought this action against her former employer, Air Canada, alleging that she was discharged because of her age in violation of the Age Discrimination Act of 1967 (29 U.S. C.A. § 621 et seq.). After a prima facie showing of age discrimination by the plaintiff, the defendant-employer produced evidence of numerous instances of unsatisfactory job performance- on the part of the plaintiff. The district court, concluding that the plaintiff failed to prove her claim of age discrimination by a preponderance of the evidence, found in favor of defendant-employer, Air Canada.

On appeal plaintiff asserts that the trial court erroneously assessed the burden of proof between the parties. She contends that upon a prima facie showing of discrimination by the plaintiff-discriminatee, the burden of proof shifts to the defendant-employer to prove nondiscrimination by a preponderance of the evidence. This is specious. Upon such a prima facie showing by the plaintiff, there is a shift, but not in the burden of proof. Only the burden of going forward with the evidence shifts to the defendant-employer. *E. g.,*Hodgson v. First Fed. Sav. & L. Ass’n, 455 F.2d 818 (5th Cir. 1972); Johnson v. University of Pittsburgh, 359 F.Supp. 1002 (W.D.Pa.1973); Ochoa v. Monsanto Co., 335 F.Supp. 53, 58-59 (S.D.Tex.1971), aff’d per curiam, 473 F.2d 318 (5th Cir. 1973). Once the defendant-employer comes forward with evidence that the plaintiff *583was discharged because of reasonable factors other than age, the plaintiff must still bear the burden of establishing a case of discrimination by a preponderance of the evidence. *See, e. g.,*Ochoa v. Monsanto, *supra;*Barnes v. Lerner Shops of Texas, Inc., 323 F.Supp. 617 (S.D.Tex.1971). In Sabatino v. Curtiss Nat’l Bank, 446 F.2d 1046 (5th Cir. 1971) we stated: “[W]hen the party having the burden of proof makes a prima facie case, the burden of proof does not shift to the opposite party, but he [the opposite party] is only required to come forward with some evidence to rebut such prima facie case.” *Id.*at 1055.

Since the defendant-employer in the case at bar offered persuasive rebuttal evidence to overcome plaintiff’s prima facie case, the trial court properly utilized the preponderance of the evidence standard in weighing the sufficiency of the plaintiff’s proof.

Plaintiff’s remaining contentions are without merit.

Affirmed.
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1123 

Recognizing the systematic abductions of Japanese citizens by North Korea. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 12, 2018 

Mr. GARRETT submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the systematic abductions of Japanese citizens 

by North Korea. 

Whereas the United States of America recognizes that North 

Korea was abducting Japanese citizens since the 1970s; 

Whereas the Universal Declaration of Human Rights upholds 

the basic principles of liberty and freedom enshrined 

within the United States Constitution and Bill of Rights; 

Whereas human rights awareness is essential to the realization of fundamental freedoms and contributes to promoting equality, preventing conflict and human rights 

violations, and enhancing participation in democratic 

processes; 

Whereas these abductions of Japanese citizens by North 

Korea directly conflict with the basic principle of liberty 

and freedom; and 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1123 IH 

Whereas there have been several attempts at dialogue between North Korea and Japanese leaders in an effort to 

yield stable results: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) calls on the Government of North Korea to 

3 release any abducted foreign nationals, including, 

4 but not limited to, those from Japan; 

5 (2) urges the Government of North Korea to re6 turn the remains and provide information on any de7 ceased abductees; 

8 (3) urges the Government of North Korea to 

9 make such reparations as are appropriate regarding 

10 abductees; and 

11 (4) urges the Government of North Korea to 

12 apologize and permanently cease such activities. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
###### Editorial Note on Part 180

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 180 appear at 79 FR 75879, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 180.875 May I ask the debarring official to reconsider a decision to debar me?

Yes, as a debarred person you may ask the debarring official to reconsider the debarment decision or to reduce the time period or scope of the debarment. However, you must put your request in writing and support it with documentation.
<Page>

                                                                   Exhibit 23



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
033-62193, No. 033-91916, No. 333-00987, No. 333-88870, No. 333-82906, and No.
333-07275 of Glenbrook Life and Annuity Company on Form S-3 of our report dated
February 5, 2003, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Glenbrook Life
and Annuity Company for the year ended December 31, 2002.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Chicago, Illinois
March 28, 2003
Exhibit
10.2


TRIUMPH
GROUP, INC.

Non-employee Director Compensation Summary

July 27, 2006


 


	
  Annual

  Retainer for

  Non-employee

  Board Member

  	
   

  	
  Additional

  Retainer for

  Committee

  Chairs

  	
   

  	
  Additional

  Retainer for

  Lead

  Director

  	
   

  	
  Meeting

  Fees

  	
   

  	
  Telephonic

  Meeting Fee

  	
   

  	
  Annual

  Equity Award

  
	
  $30,000

  	
   

  	
  Audit Comm

  Chair: $4,000;

  Other Comm.

  Chairs: $2,000

  	
   

  	
  $2,000

  	
   

  	
  Board

  meeting:

  $1,500;

  Committee

  meeting

  $1,000

  	
   

  	
  $500

  	
   

  	
  Equity grant with a

  grant date value of

  approximately $40,000.
###### Editorial Note on Part 61

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 61 appear at 80 FR 74980, Dec. 1, 2015, and at 81 FR 86909, Dec. 2, 2016.

#### § 61.6 Exemptions.

The Commission may, upon application by any interested person, or upon its own initiative, grant any exemption from the requirements of the regulations in this part as it determines is authorized by law, will not endanger life or property or the common defense and security, and is otherwise in the public interest.
Editorial Note on Part 9
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 9 appear at 82 FR 52825, Nov. 15, 2017.

§ 9.34 Assessment of interest and debt collection. ( a ) The NRC will assess interest on the fee amount billed starting on the 31st day following the day on which the billing was sent in accordance with NRC's regulations set out in § 15.37 of this chapter. The rate of interest is prescribed in 31 U.S.C. 3717.
( b ) The NRC will use its debt collection procedures under part 15 of this chapter for any overdue fees.