alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-03-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-02-2000
<CASH>                                          38,126
<SECURITIES>                                    33,700
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,233
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,490
<INVENTORY>                                     21,862
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               140,086
<PP&E>                                         808,383
<DEPRECIATION>                                 513,074
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 458,302
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          329,004
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           659
<OTHER-SE>                                      72,846
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   458,302
<SALES>                                         79,633
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                79,633
<CGS>                                           66,795
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   66,795
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,799
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   317
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,451
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,055)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       376
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,294)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,294)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.08)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Virginia National Bankshares Corporation (the Company)
for the period ending December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that, based on their knowledge and belief: (1) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.

/s/ Glenn W.
RustGlenn W. Rust, President and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Ronald E.
BaronRonald E. Baron, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

March 27, 2014

88

---
118 STAT. 696 PUBLIC LAW 108–262—JUNE 30, 2004

Public Law 108–262

108th Congress

An Act

To reauthorize the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families block grant program

through September 30, 2004, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘TANF and Related Programs

Continuation Act of 2004’’.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF THE TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY

FAMILIES BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2004.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Activities authorized by part A of title IV

of the Social Security Act, and by sections 510, 1108(b), and 1925

of such Act, shall continue through September 30, 2004, in the

manner authorized for fiscal year 2002, notwithstanding section

1902(e)(1)(A) of such Act, and out of any money in the Treasury

of the United States not otherwise appropriated, there are hereby

appropriated such sums as may be necessary for such purpose.

Grants and payments may be made pursuant to this authority

through the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2004 at the level provided

for such activities through the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2002.

(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 403(a)(3)(H)(ii) of the

Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 603(a)(3)(H)(ii)) is amended by

striking ‘‘June 30’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30’’.

SEC. 3. EXTENSION OF THE NATIONAL RANDOM SAMPLE STUDY OF

CHILD WELFARE AND CHILD WELFARE WAIVER

AUTHORITY THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2004.

Activities authorized by sections 429A and 1130(a) of the Social

Security Act shall continue through September 30, 2004, in the

manner authorized for fiscal year 2002, and out of any money

in the Treasury of the United States not otherwise appropriated,

there are hereby appropriated such sums as may be necessary

for such purpose. Grants and payments may be made pursuant

to this authority through the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2004

TANF and

Related

Programs

Continuation

Act of 2004.

42 USC 1305

note.

June 30, 2004

[H.R. 4589]

PUBLIC LAW 108–262—JUNE 30, 2004 118 STAT. 697

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4589:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):

June 22, considered and passed House and Senate.

Æ

at the level provided for such activities through the fourth quarter

of fiscal year 2002.

Approved June 30, 2004.
MANDATE

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-14-00059-CV

River Oaks L-M. Inc. d/b/a West Point 

Lincoln Mercury, Appellant

v.

Veronica Vinton-Duarte, Appellee

Appealed from the 269th District Court 

of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 2010-

54452). Opinion delivered by Justice 

McCally. Justices Frost and Boyce also 

participating.

TO THE 269TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals on May 28, 2015, the cause upon appeal to 

revise or reverse your judgment was determined. Our Court of Appeals made its 

order in these words:

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, Veronica 

Vinton-Duarte, signed November 25, 2013, was heard on the transcript of 

the record. We have inspected the record and find error in the judgment. We 

therefore REFORM the judgment of the court below as follows:

The amount awarded to plaintiff, Veronica Vinton-Duarte against West 

Point is reduced from $739,623.88 to $625,197.87. Veronica VintonDuarte is awarded actual damages from West Point in the amount of 

$625,197.87. This amount consists of $560,814.00 of compensatory 

damages as awarded by the jury on the sexual harassment and retaliation

claims, and prejudgment interest of $64,383.87 calculated from August 

30, 2010 until November 24, 2013. The compensatory damages reflect a 

reduction of $3,186.00, the amount awarded to West Point by the jury on 

its counterclaims, and a reduction of $125,000.00 due to the statutory 

damages cap provided by the Texas Labor Code.
2

We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED except as 

modified in this judgment.

We order that each party shall pay its costs by reason of this appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said 

Court in this behalf and in all things have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Kem Thompson Frost, Chief Justice of our Fourteenth 

Court of Appeals, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of Houston, August 13, 

2015.
§ 600.101 Applicability. Under the authority listed above, the Department of State adopts the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Guidance in 2 CFR part 200, except for: ( a ) The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards set forth in 2 CFR part 200 (Subparts A through F) shall apply to all non-Federal entities, except as noted below.
( b ) Subparts A through E of 2 CFR part 200 shall apply to all foreign organizations not recognized as Foreign Public Entities and Subparts A through D of 2 CFR part 200 shall apply to all U.S. and foreign for-profit entities, except where the Federal awarding agency determines that the application of these subparts would be inconsistent with the international obligations of the United States or the statute or regulations of a foreign government. The Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) at 48 CFR part 30, Cost Accounting Standards, and Part 31 Contract Cost Principles and Procedures takes precedence over the cost principles in Subpart E for Federal awards to U.S. and foreign for-profit entities. Thus, this part gives regulatory effect to the OMB guidance and supplements the guidance as needed for the Department.
# EUR-Lex - 31993H0216 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31993H0216

**93/216/EEC: Commission Recommendation of 25 February 1993 on the European firearms pass **

*
Official Journal L 093 , 17/04/1993 P. 0039 - 0041 *

COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION of 25 February 1993 on the European firearms pass

(93/216/EEC)THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, and in particular Article 155 thereof,

Whereas Annex II to Council Directive 91/477/EEC of 18 June 1991 on control of the acquisition and possession of weapons (1) sets out the information which must be contained in a European firearms pass but gives no indication of the layout of the pass;

Whereas the purpose of the European firearms pass is to facilitate the free movement of sportsmen wishing to engage in hunting or target shooting in the Community; whereas a uniform pass bearing a common logo will be a tangible sign that this objective has been achieved;

Whereas a uniform layout for the European firearms pass will also make the pass immediately recognizable to authorities who may need to examine it in the Member States; whereas such checks will be facilitated if the order and numbering of sections is made uniform, and a glossary included,

RECOMMENDS THAT:

Sole Article

In transposing the Directive, Member States should ensure that the European firearms pass which they issue conforms to the specimen annexed hereto.

Done at Brussels, 25 February 1993.

For the Commission Raniero VANNI D'ARCHIRAFI Member of the Commission >REFERENCE TO A FILM>
# EUR-Lex - 31990L0398 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31990L0398

**Council Directive 90/398/EEC of 24 July 1990 amending Directive 84/647/EEC on the use of vehicles hired without drivers for the carriage of goods by road **

*
Official Journal L 202 , 31/07/1990 P. 0046 - 0046 Finnish special edition: Chapter 7 Volume 3 P. 0205 Swedish special edition: Chapter 7 Volume 3 P. 0205 *

*****

COUNCIL DIRECTIVE

of 24 July 1990

amending Directive 84/647/EEC on the use of vehicles hired without drivers for the carriage of goods by road

(90/398/EEC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, and in particular Article 75 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission (1),

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (2),

Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee (3),

Whereas Article 8 of Directive 84/647/EEC (4) requires the Council to re-examine Articles 3 (2) and 4 (2) of the abovementioned Directive which contain restrictive clauses;

Whereas the restrictive clauses have resulted in unequal application of the Directive in the Community; whereas abolition, at least in part, of these clauses would allow better financial management and cut the costs of hauliers operating on their own account or for hire or reward;

Whereas the abovementioned Directive should therefore be amended,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:

Article 1

Directive 84/647/EEC is hereby amended as follows:

1. Article 3 (2) is replaced by the following:

'2. Member States may exclude from the provisions of paragraph 1 own-account transport operations carried out by vehicles with a total permissible laden weight of more than 6 tonnes.'

2. Article 4 (2) is deleted.

Article 2

Member States shall take the measures necessary to comply with this Directive not later than 31 December 1990 and shall forthwith inform the Commission thereof.

Article 3

This Directive is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 24 July 1990.

For the Council

The President

C. MANNINO

(1) OJ No C 296, 24. 11. 1989, p. 7 and OJ No C 150, 19. 6. 1990, p. 4.

(2) OJ No C 96, 17. 4. 1990, p. 352.

(3) OJ No C 124, 21. 5. 1990, p. 20.

(4) OJ No L 335, 22. 12. 1984, p. 72.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000945093
<NAME> HNC SOFTWARE, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         136,340
<SECURITIES>                                    29,178
<RECEIVABLES>                                   70,628
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (6,439)
<INVENTORY>                                        239
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               261,235
<PP&E>                                          43,302
<DEPRECIATION>                                (21,083)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 416,421
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,323
<BONDS>                                        100,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            26
<OTHER-SE>                                     249,547
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   249,573
<SALES>                                        216,889
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               216,889
<CGS>                                           82,189
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   82,189
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               136,372
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 5,112
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,823
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,736)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       536
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,272)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,272)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.25)


</TABLE>
# EUR-Lex - 31985R2561 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31985R2561

**Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2561/85 of 11 September 1985 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2670/81 laying down detailed implementing rules in respect of sugar production in excess of the quota **

*
Official Journal L 244 , 12/09/1985 P. 0023 - 0023 Spanish special edition: Chapter 03 Volume 37 P. 0196 Portuguese special edition Chapter 03 Volume 37 P. 0196 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 19 P. 0118 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 19 P. 0118 *

*****

COMMISSION REGULATION (EEC) No 2561/85

of 11 September 1985

amending Regulation (EEC) No 2670/81 laying down detailed implementing rules in respect of sugar production in excess of the quota

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN

COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1785/81 of 30 June 1981 on the common organization of the markets in the sugar market (1), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1482/85 (2), and in particular Article 26 (3) thereof,

Whereas, Article 26 (1) of Regulation (EEC) No 1785/81 provides in particular that C sugar must be exported in the natural state; whereas the second subparagraph of Article 2 (2) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2670/81 (3), as amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1760/84 (4), allows for substitution by other sugar white or raw in the natural state of C sugar to be exported on payment of a flat-rate amount by the producer to compensate for any advantage resulting from such a substitution; whereas the supply situation of the refineries of raw sugar in the Community, in particular with regard to the forthcoming accession of Portugal and of its particular supply of raw sugar, requires a limitation of the ability to substitute C sugar on export to white sugar only;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In the first sentence of the second subparagraph of Article 2 (2) of Regulation (EEC) No 2670/81 the terms 'or raw' are deleted.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 September 1985.

For the Commission

Frans ANDRIESSEN

Vice-President

(1) OJ No L 177, 1. 7. 1981, p. 4.

(2) OJ No L 151, 10. 6. 1985, p. 1.

(3) OJ No L 262, 16. 9. 1981, p. 14.

(4) OJ No L 165, 23. 6. 1984, p. 19.
#### In re Carter

December 6, 1950.

*Michael P. Shehadi,*for petitioners.

*Frank J. McDonnell,*for respondent.

Eagen, J.,

This action, instituted by petition and rule, seeks to declare respondent’s office of school director in the Borough of Throop vacant because of nonresidence. We are here concerned with a motion to dismiss the proceedings alleging the lack of jurisdiction.

Undoubtedly, only a resident of the district may serve in the office of school director. However, it does *384appear that the proper and exclusive remedy to oust one from such office for nonresidence is an action of quo warranto. This is the proper action to try title to public office: Williams’ Appeal, 312 Pa. 477 and Driskel et al. v. O’Connor et al., 339 Pa. 556. In the former case, it was said:

“It is admitted that appellant was duly elected, and has at all times asserted his right to the office. Under circumstances such as these, where a public officer is de facto exercising the functions of his office under color of right, we have repeatedly held that the proper remedy to test his title is by writ of quo warranto, which is not only adequate but exclusive . . . (Citations) . This is an attempt to remove an elected officer, who continues to assert his right to the office, in a manner other than that provided by law. It cannot succeed. . . . Since the sole matter involved is the right to hold a public office, quo warranto is the only appropriate method of determining the question.”

The School Code of March 10, 1949, P. L. 30, sec. 318, does provide that a petition for ouster, such as we have here, may be presented under certain circumstances, i. e., where the school directors refuse to organize or where a school director refuses or fails to perform any duty imposed upon him by the code. We do not believe that the allegation of nonresidence fits in either category. No case has been called to our attention which sustains any such conclusion.

Therefore, December 6, 1950, the petition to oust is dismissed and the rule to show cause discharged without prejudice to the right of petitioners to prosecute an action of quo warranto.
§ 1138.710 Financial reporting requirements for subawards. ( a ) *Requirement.* A DoD Component's general terms and conditions must specify financial reporting requirements for subawards.
( b ) *Award terms and conditions.* A DoD Component's general terms and conditions must use the wording appendix G to this part provides for Section C of SUB Article VII to specify the financial reporting requirements that recipients must include in their subawards.
AAM-12-182-E February 2, 2012

Exemption No. 10440 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2012-0069

Mr. John C. Kline Manager

Falcon Aviation LLC 5220 West US Highway 20 Angola, IN 46703

Dear Mr. Kline:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By submission dated January 18, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Falcon Aviation LLC (Falcon Aviation) for an exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allowFalcon Aviation, which is operating under separate parts of 14 CFR, to cover its safetysensitive employees under one testing program.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Falcon Aviation.

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs.2

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703;

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Falcon Aviation LLC an exemption from part 120 to the extent necessary to allow Falcon Aviation, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program, subject to the

conditions and limitations described below.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Employees of Falcon Aviation are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the Falcon Aviation part 135 operation, not under part 91.

This exemption terminates on February 28, 2014 unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/
James R. Fraser, M.D. Deputy Federal Air Surgeon

Enclosure