alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
,i\OO sr,,7'

,, : . .. 

( PRO"'"-v

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION 1

1 CONGRESS STREET, SUITE 1100

BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02114-2023

SEP 1 8 2009

James P. Brooks, Director

Bureau of Air Quality

Maine Department of Environmental Protection

State House, Station No. 17

Augusta, ME 04333

Dear Mr. Brooks:

On August 27 2009, we received a request to amend the Maine State Implementation

Plan (SIP). This SIP revision request includes the submittal of a Reasonably Available

Control Technology (RACT) analysis regarding the 1997 8-hour ozone standard. In

addition, on September 11 2009, we received a SIP submittal containing Maine

Chapter 131 "Cutback and Emulsified Asphalt" regulation.

We have determined that these submittals are administratively and technically complete.

We are currently reviewing the submittals to determine their approvability.

As you know, on March 24, 2008 (73 FR 15416), EP A issued a finding of failure to

submit to Maine for its RACT SIP. This finding started an 18 month sanctions clock.

Today s completeness determination stops this sanctions clock and sanctions wil not

take effect.

Ariel Garcia is the principal contact for this rulemaking. If you or your staff have any

questions on this issue, please call him at 617-918- 1660.

Ken Moraff, Acting Director

Office of Ecosystem Protection

cc: Jeff Crawford, ME DEP

Ronald Severance, ME DEP

Marc Cone, ME DEP

Toll Free. 1-888-372-7341

Intemet Address (URL) . http://www.epa.gov/region1

Recycled/Recyclable. Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 30% Postconsumer)
# EUR-Lex - 31993D0510 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31993D0510

**93/510/EEC: Commission Decision of 21 September 1993 amending Commission Decision 93/197/EEC on animal health conditions and veterinary certification for imports of registered equidae and equidae for breeding and production **

*
Official Journal L 238 , 23/09/1993 P. 0045 - 0045 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 52 P. 0158 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 52 P. 0158 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 21 September 1993 amending Commission Decision 93/197/EEC on animal health conditions and veterinary certification for imports of registered equidae and equidae for breeding and production

(93/510/EEC)THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 90/426/EEC of 26 June 1990 on animal health conditions governing the movement and import from thir countries of equidae (1), as last amended by Directive 92/36/EEC (2), and in particular Article 15 (a) and Article 16 thereof,

Whereas Commission Decision 93/197/EEC (3) lays down the animal health conditions and veterinary certification for imports of registered equidae and equidae for breeding and production;

Whereas, in accordance with this decision, the equidae in question may be imported into the Community only if they have been resident during a specified period in establishments under veterinary supervision in the third country of dispatch; whereas difficulties have arisen in practice because this entire period has to be spent in the third country of dispatch;

Whereas it should be specified that it is not necessary for the entire period to be spent in the third country of dispatch if the equidae were imported directly from the Community; whereas, therefore, it is necessary to amend Decision 93/197/EEC;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Annex II to Decision 93/197/EEC is hereby amended as follows:

in point (d) of Section III of Certificates A, B, C, D and E, the text in brackets is replaced by 'or since birth if the animal is less than three months old or since entry if it was imported directly from the European Community during the previous three months'.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 21 September 1993.

For the Commission

René STEICHEN

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 224, 18. 8. 1990, p. 42.

(2) OJ No L 157, 10. 6. 1992, p. 28.

(3) OJ No L 86, 6. 4. 1993, p. 16.
#### § 1.91 Payment for samples.

The Food and Drug Administration will pay for all import samples which are found to be in compliance with the requirements of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Billing for reimbursement should be made by the owner or consignee to the Food and Drug Administration division where the shipment was offered for import. Payment for samples will not be made if the article is found to be in violation of the act, even though subsequently brought into compliance under the terms of an authorization to bring the article into compliance or rendered not a food, drug, device, or cosmetic as set forth in § 1.95.

[42 FR 15553, Mar. 22, 1977, as amended at 85 FR 50781, Aug. 18, 2020]
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 929 

To congratulate Fort Collins, Colorado, on being named the best place to 

live in the United States for 2006. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 19, 2006 

Mrs. MUSGRAVE submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

To congratulate Fort Collins, Colorado, on being named the 

best place to live in the United States for 2006. 

Whereas Money magazine named Fort Collins the ‘‘Best 

Place to Live’’ in the United States for 2006; 

Whereas the city of Fort Collins, Colorado, is an example of 

the best aspects of life in the United States; 

Whereas the citizens of Fort Collins enjoy superior educational opportunities, including access to quality higher 

education in Colorado State University and Aims Community College and a strong public education system, including the number one ranked high school in the state, 

Ridgeview Classical School, a public charter school; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 929 IH 

Whereas the Fort Collins strong job market is centered on 

the high technology businesses that help to drive a strong 

national economy; 

Whereas the citizens of Fort Collins enjoy easy access to the 

beautiful natural resources of the mountain west, including Horsetooth Reservoir, the Cache la Poudre river valley, and the nearby Rocky Mountain National Park; and 

Whereas the citizens of Fort Collins enjoy the safety and security of a very low crime rate: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives con2 gratulates Fort Collins, Colorado, on being named the best 

3 place to live in the United States for 2006. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
BMP-like documents from Delaware Mosquito Control

Meredith William H. (DNREC) 

to: 

Jack Faulk, Susan Lewis 

07/13/2009 11:29 AM 

Show Details 

History: This message has been replied to and forwarded. 

JACK/SUSAN – as some follow‐up to last Thursday’s EPA/State Workgroup conference call, attached above are

some documents from Delaware Mosquito Control that might be of some help to EPA or the Workgroup, in the

manner of some “BMP‐like” documents that you were inquiring about for mosquito control insecticide spraying.

  

“BMP‐like” documents

  

1) Department‐level (DNREC) “Mosquito Control Spray Policy” (13 pp.)

2) Delaware Mosquito Control’s “Spray Threshold Criteria” (8 pp.)

  

Frequently‐asked questions (FAQs) – while not exactly “BMPs”, these FAQs contain a lot of information one

might find in BMPs for our work.  

  

3) Delaware Mosquito Control’s “A Dozen (12) Frequently‐asked Questions (FAQs)” (32 pp.)

  

Cheers, BILL

Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Documents and Settings\jfaulk\Local Settings\Temp\notesFCBCEE\~web8210.htm 5/12/2010
EX-10.4 FOUNDERS' UNITS SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT



 







Exhibit 10.4




FOUNDERS’
UNITS SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT




TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF

FREEDOM ACQUISITION HOLDINGS, INC.:




          James N. Hauslein hereby subscribes for FORTY THOUSAND (40,000) units (“Units”) of Freedom
Acquisition Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”) for an aggregate purchase
price of ONE HUNDRED AND SIX DOLLARS AND 66/100 ($106.66), the receipt and sufficiency of which is
hereby acknowledged. Each Unit shall consist of (i) one (1) share of the Corporation’s common
stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “Common Stock”) and (ii) one (1) warrant to purchase one
share of Common Stock of the Corporation at $6.00 per share (each, a “Warrant”). Upon receipt by
the Corporation of said consideration on this date, the Corporation shall issue to the undersigned
a stock and warrant certificate or certificates (or, if not certificated, provide documentation
reflecting the registration in the name of the undersigned on the stock and warrant ledgers of the
Corporation) representing such fully paid and non-assessable shares of Common Stock and Warrants of
the Corporation. The subscription will represent four-tenths of one percent (0.4%) of the total
number of outstanding shares of Common Stock and Warrants of the Corporation. Following such
issuance of shares of Common Stock and Warrants of the Corporation, the capitalization of the
Corporation shall be as set forth on Schedule A hereto.



[Signature Page to Follow]




 









 





Dated:
July 20, 2006




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/S/ JAMES N. HAUSLEIN
	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Name:
	 	James N. Hauslein	 	 






Accepted and Agreed on this

20th day of July 2006:



FREEDOM ACQUISITION HOLDINGS, INC.




	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/S/ NICOLAS BERGGRUEN
	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	Name:

	 	Nicolas Berggruen	 	 
	Title:

	 	President	 	 






 









 





SCHEDULE A




Capitalization
of Freedom Acquisition Holdings, Inc.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Number of	 	Number of	 	Number of	 	Percentage
	Stockholder	 	Units	 	Shares	 	Warrants	 	Ownership
	Berggruen Holdings North America
Ltd
	 	 	4,627,500	 	 	 	4,627,500	 	 	 	4,627,500	 	 	 	49.4	%
	Marlin Equities II, LLC
	 	 	4,627,500	 	 	 	4,627,500	 	 	 	4,627,500	 	 	 	49.4	%
	Herbert A. Morey
	 	 	40,000	 	 	 	40,000	 	 	 	40,000	 	 	 	0.4	%
	William P. Lauder
	 	 	40,000	 	 	 	40,000	 	 	 	40,000	 	 	 	0.4	%
	James N. Hauslein
	 	 	40,000	 	 	 	40,000	 	 	 	40,000	 	 	 	0.4	%
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Total
	 	 	9,375 000	 	 	 	9,375,000	 	 	 	9,375,000	 	 	 	100	%
###### Editorial Note on Part 180

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 180 appear at 79 FR 75879, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 180.140 Does an exclusion under the nonprocurement system affect a person's eligibility for Federal procurement contracts?

If any Federal agency excludes a person under Executive Order 12549 or Executive Order 12689, on or after August 25, 1995, the excluded person is also ineligible for Federal procurement transactions under the FAR. Therefore, an exclusion under this part has reciprocal effect in Federal procurement transactions.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities

# AGENCY:

Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS), NFAH.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

This notice sets forth the agenda of the forthcoming meeting of the National Museum and Library Services Board. This notice also describes the function of the Board. Notice of the meeting is required under the Sunshine in Government Act.

# Time and Date:

Tuesday, February 23, 2010 from 9:30 a.m. until 1 p.m.

# Agenda:

Nineteenth Meeting of the National Museum and Library Services Board.

I. Welcome.

II. Approval of Minutes.

III. Financial Update.

IV. Legislative Update.

V. Board Program.

VI. Board Updates.

VII. Closing Remarks by the Director.

VIII. Adjourn.

(Open to the Public.)

# Place:

The meetings will be held in the Room MO-9 of the Old Post Office, located at 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20506.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Elizabeth Lyons, Director of Special Events and Board Liaison, Institute of Museum and Library Services, 1800 M Street, NW., 9th Floor, Washington, DC, 20036. Telephone: (202) 653-4676 or E-mail:                         *elyons@imls.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                        The National Museum and Library Services Board is established under the Museum and Library Services Act, 20 U.S.C. 9101*et seq.*                         The Board advises the Director of the Institute on general policies with respect to the duties, powers, and authorities related to Museum and Library Services.                    

If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please contact: Institute of Museum and Library Services, 1800 M Street, NW., 9th Fl., Washington, DC 20036. Telephone: (202) 653-4676; TDD (202) 653-4614 at least seven (7) days prior to the meeting date.

Dated: February 16, 2010.

Kate Fernstrom,

Chief of Staff.

[FR Doc. 2010-3306 Filed 2-22-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7036-01-P
§ 111.113 What quality control operations are required for a material review and disposition decision? ( a ) Quality control personnel must conduct a material review and make a disposition decision if: ( 1 ) A specification established in accordance with § 111.70 is not met;
( 2 ) A batch deviates from the master manufacturing record, including when any step established in the master manufacturing record is not completed and including any deviation from specifications;
( 3 ) There is any unanticipated occurrence during the manufacturing operations that adulterates or may lead to adulteration of the component, dietary supplement, or packaging, or could lead to the use of a label not specified in the master manufacturing record;
( 4 ) Calibration of an instrument or control suggests a problem that may have resulted in a failure to ensure the quality of a batch or batches of a dietary supplement; or
( 5 ) A dietary supplement is returned.
( b ) ( 1 ) When there is a deviation or unanticipated occurrence during the production and in-process control system that results in or could lead to adulteration of a component, dietary supplement, or packaging, or could lead to the use of a label not specified in the master manufacturing record, quality control personnel must reject the component, dietary supplement, packaging, or label unless it approves a treatment, an in-process adjustment, or reprocessing to correct the applicable deviation or occurrence.
( 2 ) When a specification established in accordance with § 111.70 is not met, quality control personnel must reject the component, dietary supplement, package or label, unless quality control personnel approve a treatment, an in-process adjustment, or reprocessing, as permitted in § 111.77.
( c ) The person who conducts a material review and makes the disposition decision must, at the time of performance, document that material review and disposition decision.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 928 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 928

 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that a National 
      Historically Black Colleges and Universities Week should be 
                              established.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 19, 2006

 Ms. Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas (for herself, Mr. Wilson of South 
   Carolina, Mr. Weldon of Pennsylvania, and Mr. Hall) submitted the 
following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education 
                           and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that a National 
      Historically Black Colleges and Universities Week should be 
                              established.

Whereas there are 105 historically Black colleges and universities in the United 
        States;
Whereas historically Black colleges and universities provide the quality 
        education essential to full participation in a complex, highly 
        technological society;
Whereas historically Black colleges and universities have a rich heritage and 
        have played a prominent role in the history of the United States;
Whereas historically Black colleges and universities have allowed many 
        underprivileged students to attain their full potential through higher 
        education;
Whereas the achievements and goals of historically Black colleges and 
        universities are deserving of national recognition; and
Whereas the Senate, in S. Res. 528 passed on July 13, 2006, designated the week 
        beginning September 10, 2006, as ``National Historically Black Colleges 
        and Universities Week'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the achievements and goals of historically 
        Black colleges and universities in the United States;
            (2) supports the designation of an appropriate week as 
        ``National Historically Black Colleges and Universities Week''; 
        and
            (3) requests the President to issue a proclamation 
        designating such a week, and calling on the people of the 
        United States and interested groups to observe such week with 
        appropriate ceremonies, activities, and programs to demonstrate 
        support for historically Black colleges and universities.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 2000.135 Who in the Nuclear Regulatory Commission may grant an exception to let an excluded person participate in a covered transaction?

The Director, Office of Administration or another official designated by the Director, has the authority to grant a written exception to let an excluded person participate in a covered transaction, as provided in guidance at 2 CFR 180.135. The Director or other official designated by the Director shall explain the reason(s) for deviating from the governmentwide policy.
226 So.2d 921

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Ronald LEE.

No. 50151.

Oct. 14, 1969.

In re: Ronald Lee applying for writ of habeas corpus.

. Writ granted. The trial court is ordered-, to immediately hold a bail bond hearing for' a determination of the correct bond upon'a.; proper basis and one other than that shown in the return. See C.C.Pr. Article 317, and. Louisiana v. Blanchard, 254 La. 644, 226, So.2d 336. See order.

HAMLIN, J.,

is of the opinion that, on the showing made, application should be denied.

It is Ordered that the Honorable Oliver P. Schulingkamp, Judge of Section F, Criminal District Court, Parish of Orleans; immediately hold a bail bond hearing for á determination of the correct bond upon a proper basis and one other than that shown in the return.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-30603

Summary Calendar

 

VAUGHN HOWARD,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JOHN P. WHITLEY, WARDEN,

LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY, ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 92-CV-793-A

- - - - - - - - - -

May 9, 1997

Before KING, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Vaughn Howard, Louisiana prisoner # 98700, has appealed the

district court’s verdict for defendants-appellees Kevin Warren

and Cheryl Honore after a bench trial. Howard’s contention that

the district court should not have relied on standards stated in

Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825 (1994), to adjudicate his claim

of deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs, has no
No. 96-30603

- 2 -

merit. See Reeves v. Collins, 27 F.3d 174, 176 (5th Cir. 1994). 

As to this point, the district court’s judgment is hereby

AFFIRMED.

Howard also contends that the district court erred by

rendering judgment for Warren and Honore, based on testimony

which the district court rejected in favor of other testimony. 

To obtain relief, Howard would have to show that the district

court’s findings are clearly erroneous. See Fed. R. Civ. P.

52(a); Anderson v. City of Bessemer City, 470 U.S. 564, 575

(1985). The court cannot determine the merits of this claim

because Howard did not include a transcript of Warren’s and

Honore’s testimony in the appellate record. As to this claim,

therefore, the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. See Richardson v.

Henry, 902 F.2d 414, 416 (5th Cir. 1990).

AFFIRMED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART.
2008-0120.

#### State ex rel. Kugler v. Indus. Comm.

Franklin App. No. 07AP-77, 2007-0hio-6541.
###### Editorial Note on Part 180

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 180 appear at 79 FR 75879, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 180.650 May an administrative agreement be the result of a settlement?

Yes, a Federal agency may enter into an administrative agreement with you as part of the settlement of a debarment or suspension action.

[80 FR 43308, July 22, 2015]
§ 910.509 Auditor selection. ( a ) *Auditor procurement.* When procuring audit services, the objective is to obtain high-quality audits. In requesting proposals for audit services, the objectives and scope of the audit must be made clear and the for-profit entity must request a copy of the audit organization's peer review report which the auditor is required to provide under GAGAS. Factors to be considered in evaluating each proposal for audit services include the responsiveness to the request for proposal, relevant experience, availability of staff with professional qualifications and technical abilities, the results of peer and external quality control reviews, and price. Whenever possible, the auditee must make positive efforts to utilize small businesses, minority-owned firms, and women's business enterprises, in procuring audit services as stated in 2 CFR 200.321 Contracting with small and minority businesses, women's business enterprises, and labor surplus area firms, or the FAR (48 CFR part 42), as applicable.
( b ) *Restriction on auditor preparing indirect cost proposals.* An auditor who prepares the indirect cost proposal or cost allocation plan may not also be selected to perform the audit required by this Part when the indirect costs recovered by the auditee during the prior year exceeded $1 million. This restriction applies to the base year used in the preparation of the indirect cost proposal or cost allocation plan and any subsequent years in which the resulting indirect cost agreement or cost allocation plan is used to recover costs.
( c ) *Use of Federal auditors.* Federal auditors may perform all or part of the work required under this Part if they comply fully with the requirements of this Part.