81968 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 249 / Wednesday, December 29, 2010 / Notices 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–5050 or (202) 482– 

1391. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to this 

antidumping duty order is porcelain-onsteel cooking ware from Taiwan that 

does not have self-contained electric 

heating elements. All of the foregoing 

are constructed of steel and are 

enameled or glazed with vitreous 

glasses. Kitchenware and teakettles are 

not subject to the order. The 

merchandise is currently classifiable 

under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule 

of the United States (HTSUS) number 

7323.94.00. HTSUS item numbers are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes. The written description of the 

scope remains dispositive. 

Background 

On December 2, 1986, the Department 

published, in the Federal Register, the 

antidumping duty order on POS cooking 

ware from Taiwan. See Antidumping 

Duty Order; Porcelain-on-Steel Cooking 

Ware from Taiwan, 51 FR 43416 

(December 2, 1986). In two subsequent 

sunset reviews, based on affirmative 

decisions by the Department and the 

International Trade Commission, the 

antidumping duty order on POS cooking 

ware from Taiwan was continued. See 

Continuation of Antidumping Duty 

Orders: Porcelain-on-Steel Cooking 

Ware From China, Mexico, and Taiwan, 

65 FR 20136 (April 14, 2000); Porcelainon-Steel Cooking Ware from the 

People’s Republic of China and Taiwan; 

Continuation of Antidumping Duty 

Orders, 70 FR 70581 (November 22, 

2005). 

On October 1, 2010, the Department 

initiated the current sunset review of 

the antidumping duty order on POS 

cooking ware from Taiwan, pursuant to 

section 751(c) of the Act. See Initiation 

Notice. We received no response to the 

notice of initiation from the domestic 

industry by the applicable deadline. See 

19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i). As a result, the 

Department has determined that no 

domestic interested party intends to 

participate in the sunset review. See 19 

CFR 351.218(d)(1)(iii)(B). On October 

21, 2010, we notified the International 

Trade Commission, in writing, that we 

intend to revoke the antidumping duty 

order on POS cooking ware from 

Taiwan. See 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(1)(iii)(B)(2). 

Revocation 

Pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(A) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(iii)(B)(3), 

if no domestic interested party files a 

notice of intent to participate in the 

sunset review, the Department shall, 

within 90 days after the initiation of the 

review, revoke the order. Because no 

domestic interested party filed a timely 

notice of intent to participate in this 

sunset review, the Department finds that 

no domestic interested party is 

participating in this sunset review. 

Therefore, we are revoking the 

antidumping duty order on POS cooking 

ware from Taiwan. 

Effective Date of Revocation 

The effective date of revocation is 

November 22, 2010, the fifth 

anniversary of the date of publication in 

the Federal Register of the most recent 

notice of continuation of the 

antidumping duty order. See 19 CFR 

351.222(i)(2)(i). Pursuant to sections 

751(c)(3)(A) and 751(c)(6)(A)(iii) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.222(i)(2)(i), the 

Department intends to instruct U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection to 

terminate the suspension of liquidation 

of the merchandise subject to this 

antidumping duty order entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption, on or after November 22, 

2010. 

Entries of subject merchandise prior 

to the effective date of revocation will 

continue to be subject to suspension of 

liquidation and antidumping duty 

deposit requirements. The Department 

will complete any pending 

administrative reviews of the order and 

will conduct administrative reviews of 

subject merchandise entered prior to the 

effective date of revocation in response 

to appropriately filed requests for 

review. 

This five-year (sunset) review and 

notice are issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(c) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: December 21, 2010. 

Christian Marsh, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2010–32771 Filed 12–28–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–910] 

Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel 

Pipe From the People’s Republic of 

China: Rescission of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On August 31, 2010, the U.S. 

Department of Commerce (the 

‘‘Department’’) published a notice of 

initiation of an administrative review of 

the antidumping duty order on circular 

welded carbon quality steel pipe 

(‘‘CWP’’) from the People’s Republic of 

China (‘‘PRC’’). This administrative 

review was initiated on 18 exporters of 

CWP from the PRC. We are now 

rescinding this administrative review in 

full. 

DATES: Effective Date: December 29, 

2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Thomas Martin, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office 4, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–3936. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 1, 2010, the Department 

published in the Federal Register the 

notice of opportunity to request an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on CWP from 

the PRC for the period July 1, 2009, 

through June 30, 2010. See 

Antidumping or Countervailing Duty 

Order, Finding, or Suspended 

Investigation; Opportunity To Request 

Administrative Review, 75 FR 38074, 

38075 (July 1, 2010). On August 2, 2010, 

the Department received a timely 

request from the Ad Hoc Coalition For 

Fair Pipe Imports and its individual 

members, Allied Tube & Conduit, 

IPSCO Tubulars, Inc., Sharon Tube 

Company, Western Tube & Conduit 

Corporation, and Wheatland Tube 

Company (collectively, ‘‘Petitioner’’), 

that the Department conduct an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on CWP from 

the PRC, covering 18 exporters of CWP 

from the PRC. No other party requested 

an administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on CWP from 

the PRC. On August 31, 2010, the 

Department published in the Federal 

Register the notice of initiation of the 

2009–2010 administrative review of 

CWP from the PRC. See Initiation of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews and Deferral of 

Initiation of Administrative Review, 75 

FR 53274, 53276 (August 31, 2010). 

On September 16, 2010, the 

Department issued a memorandum 

providing an opportunity for interested 

parties to comment on U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) 

information to be used by the 

Department in its respondent selection. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 249 / Wednesday, December 29, 2010 / Notices 81969 

On October 27, 2010, Petitioner filed a 

letter withdrawing its request for review 

of the 18 exporters for which the 

Department initiated this review. 

Period of Review 

The period of review (‘‘POR’’) is July 

1, 2009, through June 30, 2010. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to the order 

is certain welded carbon quality steel 

pipes and tubes, of circular crosssection, and with an outside diameter of 

0.372 inches (9.45 mm) or more, but not 

more than 16 inches (406.4 mm), 

whether or not stenciled, regardless of 

wall thickness, surface finish (e.g., 

black, galvanized, or painted), end 

finish (e.g., plain end, beveled end, 

grooved, threaded, or threaded and 

coupled), or industry specification (e.g., 

ASTM, proprietary, or other), generally 

known as standard pipe and structural 

pipe (they may also be referred to as 

circular, structural, or mechanical 

tubing). 

Specifically, the term ‘‘carbon quality’’ 

includes products in which (a) iron 

predominates, by weight, over each of 

the other contained elements; (b) the 

carbon content is 2 percent or less, by 

weight; and (c) none of the elements 

listed below exceeds the quantity, by 

weight, as indicated: 

(i) 1.80 percent of manganese; 

(ii) 2.25 percent of silicon; 

(iii) 1.00 percent of copper; 

(iv) 0.50 percent of aluminum; 

(v) 1.25 percent of chromium; 

(vi) 0.30 percent of cobalt; 

(vii) 0.40 percent of lead; 

(viii) 1.25 percent of nickel; 

(ix) 0.30 percent of tungsten; 

(x) 0.15 percent of molybdenum; 

(xi) 0.10 percent of niobium; 

(xii) 0.41 percent of titanium; 

(xiii) 0.15 percent of vanadium; or 

(xiv) 0.15 percent of zirconium. 

Standard pipe is made primarily to 

American Society for Testing and 

Materials (‘‘ASTM’’) specifications, but 

can be made to other specifications. 

Standard pipe is made primarily to 

ASTM specifications A–53, A–135, and 

A–795. Structural pipe is made 

primarily to ASTM specifications A–252 

and A–500. Standard and structural 

pipe may also be produced to 

proprietary specifications rather than to 

industry specifications. This is often the 

case, for example, with fence tubing. 

Pipe multiple-stenciled to a standard 

and/or structural specification and to 

any other specification, such as the 

American Petroleum Institute (‘‘API’’) 

API–5L specification, is also covered by 

the scope of the order when it meets the 

physical description set forth above and 

also has one or more of the following 

characteristics: is 32 feet in length or 

less; is less than 2.0 inches (50 mm) in 

outside diameter; has a galvanized and/ 

or painted surface finish; or has a 

threaded and/or coupled end finish. 

(The term ‘‘painted’’ does not include 

coatings to inhibit rust in transit, such 

as varnish, but includes coatings such as 

polyester.) 

The scope of the order does not 

include: (a) Pipe suitable for use in 

boilers, superheaters, heat exchangers, 

condensers, refining furnaces and 

feedwater heaters, whether or not cold 

drawn; (b) mechanical tubing, whether 

or not cold-drawn; (c) finished electrical 

conduit; (d) finished scaffolding; (e) 

tube and pipe hollows for redrawing; (f) 

oil country tubular goods produced to 

API specifications; and (g) line pipe 

produced to only API specifications. 

The pipe products that are the subject 

of the order are currently classifiable in 

the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) statistical 

reporting numbers 7306.30.10.00, 

7306.30.50.25, 7306.30.50.32, 

7306.30.50.40, 7306.30.50.55, 

7306.30.50.85, 7306.30.50.90, 

7306.50.10.00, 7306.50.50.50, 

7306.50.50.70, 7306.19.10.10, 

7306.19.10.50, 7306.19.51.10, and 

7306.19.51.50. However, the product 

description, and not HTSUS 

classification, is dispositive of whether 

merchandise imported into the United 

States falls within the scope of the 

order. 

Rescission of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the 

Secretary will rescind an administrative 

review under this section, in whole or 

in part, if a party that requested a review 

withdraws the request within 90 days of 

the date of publication of notice of 

initiation of the requested review. 

Because Petitioner withdrew its review 

request for all 18 exporters within the 

90-day deadline, and no other party 

requested an administrative review of 

the antidumping order on CWP from the 

PRC, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(1) the Department is 

rescinding this administrative review in 

full. 

Assessment Instructions 

The Department will instruct CBP to 

assess antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries. For exporters for 

which this review is rescinded, 

antidumping duties shall be assessed at 

rates equal to the cash deposit of 

estimated antidumping duties required 

at the time of entry, or withdrawal from 

warehouse, for consumption, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department 

intends to issue appropriate assessment 

instructions directly to CBP 15 days 

after publication of this notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a reminder to 

importers of their responsibility under 

19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of doubled antidumping duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Orders 

This notice serves as a reminder to 

parties subject to administrative 

protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of the return or 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(4). 

Dated: December 22, 2010. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2010–32862 Filed 12–28–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–855] 

Certain Non-Frozen Apple Juice 

Concentrate From the Peoples’ 

Republic of China: Rescission of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce 

DATES: Effective Date: December 29, 

2010. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Department’’) is rescinding the 

administrative review of non-frozen 

apple juice concentrate from the 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES