alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

COMM 2013-CCRE6

The undersigned, David Co, a Director of Deutsche Bank Trust
Company Americas, as the Certificate Administrator (a “Certifying Servicer”) under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement,
dated as of March 1, 2013 (the “Agreement”), by and among, Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, as
Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer,
U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and
Custodian, and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor, here by certifies in accordance with Section 10.11 of the
Agreement:



| | A) | A review of such Certifying Servicer’s activities from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017 (the “reporting period”)
and of such Certifying Servicer’s performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | B) | That, as to the best of such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, such Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all its
obligations under the Agreement, in all material respects throughout the reporting period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS

as Certificate Administrator





BY: David Co

Title: Director

Date: March 1, 2018
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 95 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                     February 16, 2005.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order 
without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the bill 
(H.R. 310) to increase the penalties for violations by television and radio 
broadcasters of the prohibitions against transmission of obscene, indecent, and 
profane material, and for other purposes. The bill shall be considered as read. 
The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and on any 
amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one 
hour of debate on the bill equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on Energy and Commerce; (2) an 
amendment printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this 
resolution, if offered by Representative Upton of Michigan or his designee, 
which shall be in order without intervention of any point of order or demand for 
division of the question, shall be considered as read, and shall be separately 
debatable for 20 minutes equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an 
opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
222 So.2d 885

#### Elizabeth S. LACY, Individually and Administratrix of Karen Lacy and W. O. Lacy v. CANAL INSURANCE COMPANY, R. A. Fowler d/b/a R. A. Fowler Trucking Company and Billy M. Bailey.

No. 49839.

June 9, 1969.

In re: Elizabeth S. Lacy, individually, ■ etc. et al applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Bossier. 223 So.2d 200.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in its judgment.
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of American Resources and Development
Company. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Keith M Elison, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)       The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)       The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.





/s/   KEITH
M ELISON





Keith
M Elison


Chief
Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer


August 6,
2009





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The
foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-Q solely
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not
being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure
document.
PGI 204.4 -SAFEGUARDING CLASSIFIED

INFORMATION WITHIN INDUSTRY

Parent topic: PGI Part 204 - ADMINISTRATIVE AND INFORMATION MATTERS

PGI 204.402 -General.

(1) The use of “Not Releasable to Foreign Nationals” (NOFORN) caveat on Department of Defense

(DoD) Information, to include contract documents, shall not be applied to non-intelligence

information except for Naval Nuclear Propulsion Information and the National Disclosure Policy

document (NDP-1).

(2) Agencies shall not restrict procurements on the basis of foreign origin but rather on the level of

security clearance required by industry to submit an offer and perform on the contract.

PGI 204.403 Responsibilities of contracting officers.

(1) Consistent with the requirements at FAR Subpart 4.403, contracting officers shall ensure that

solicitations, to include any Broad Agency Announcement (BAA) or notice to industry, that requires

industry access to classified information and/or controlled unclassified information (see policy

memos), shall contain one or more of the following:

(i) Draft DoD Form DD 254, DoD Contract Security Classification Specification.

See Defense Security Service (DSS) guide for the preparation of the DD Form 254 at

http://www.dss.mil/isp/tools.html and select “A Guide for the Preparation of a DD Form 254”.

(ii) The clause at FAR 52.204-2, Security Requirements.

(iii) Detailed agency instructions for industry requirements to request access to classified

information and/or controlled unclassified information. Agency instructions shall clearly reference

and be in accordance with the National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM)

(DoD 5220-22-M) and Industrial Security Regulation (DoD 5220.22-R).

(iv) The following is a template of agency instructions to industry:

“Offerors must have a valid U.S. security clearance of [to be filled in by the contracting officer] or

higher in order to respond to this RFP (Announcement), because the RFP (Announcement) includes

an annex (information) classified at the [to be filled in by the contracting officer] level which will be

released only to offerors possessing the appropriate clearance. All classified material must be

handled in accordance with the National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM)

(DoD 5220-22-M) and Industrial Security Regulation (DoD 5220.22-R).”

(2) Fundamental research project determination.

(i) Projects being scoped as fundamental research may include the entire contract effort or a

specified portion of the statement of work, and must be documented in the written determination
and in the contract.

(ii) The determination of fundamental research shall occur when the project is added to the

statement of work, either prior to award or during a contract modification that modified the

statement of work.

(iii) Fundamental research is defined in the USD(A&S) memorandum on Fundamental Research,

dated May 24, 2010.

(iv) See clause 252.204-7000(a)(3), concerning disclosure of information for fundamental research

projects.
Exhibit 32.2

Exhibit 32.2 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Calgon Carbon Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended
March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Leroy M. Ball, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and result of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Leroy M. Ball      
|Chief Financial Officer
|March 27, 2006         

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 34 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 34

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                       January 9, 2017.
    Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is hereby, elected to the 
following standing committee of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Armed Services: Mr. Smith of Washington.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### § 382.225 Whom in HHS does a recipient other than an individual notify about a criminal drug conviction?

A recipient other than an individual that is required under 2 CFR 182.225(a) to notify Federal agencies about an employee's conviction for a criminal drug offense must notify each HHS office from which it currently has an award.
§ 1132.310 National policy requirements. ( a ) *Requirement.* A DoD Component's general terms and conditions must require recipients to include provisions in their contracts that require the contractors to comply with applicable national policy requirements.
( b ) *Award terms and conditions* — ( 1 ) *General.* To implement the requirement in paragraph (a) of this section, a DoD Component's general terms and conditions must use the wording that appendix C to this part provides for Section B of PROC Article III.
( 2 ) *Exceptions.* ( i ) The Wage Rate Requirements (Construction) statute (40 U.S.C. 3141-44, 3146, and 3147) does not apply to a program carried out through grants or cooperative agreements unless another statute makes it apply to that program. A DoD Component's general terms and conditions therefore may not include the provision that appendix C to this part includes as paragraph B.2 of PROC Article III unless another statute makes the Wage Rate Requirements statute apply to the program using those general terms and conditions.
( ii ) If a DoD Component determines that any of the other national policy requirements in Section B will not apply to any of the awards subject to its general terms and conditions, the DoD Component may reserve the paragraphs of Section B addressing those requirements. Should a future need arise to include the requirements in a given award, the DoD Component may include them as award-specific terms and conditions.
§ 1400.20 When does this part apply to me? This part and, through this part, pertinent portions of the OMB guidance in subparts A through I of 2 CFR part 180 (see table at 2 CFR 180.100(b)) apply to you if you are— ( a ) Participant or principal in a “covered transaction” (see subpart B of 2 CFR part 180 and the definition of “nonprocurement transaction” at 2 CFR 180.970, as supplemented by subpart B and § 1400.970);
( b ) Respondent in a Department of the Interior suspension or debarment action;
( c ) Department of the Interior debarment or suspension official, i.e., the Director, Office of Acquisition and Property Management; or
( d ) Department of the Interior grants officer, agreements officer, or other official authorized to enter into any type of nonprocurement transaction that is a covered transaction.
#### TRANGEL, Respondent, v. BOORUM *&*PEASE CO. et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

November 13, 1914.)

Action by Mary Trangel against the Boorum & Pease Company, and another.

No opinion. Motion for reargument (149 N. Y. Supp. 1114) denied, with $10 costs.
§ 709.31 DOE standards for polygraph examiners and polygraph examinations. ( a ) DOE adheres to the procedures and standards established by the Department of Defense Polygraph Institute (DODPI). DOE administers only DODPI approved testing formats.
( b ) A polygraph examiner may administer no more than five polygraph examinations in any twenty-four hour period. This does not include those instances in which a covered person voluntarily terminates an examination prior to the actual testing phase.
( c ) The polygraph examiner must be certified to conduct polygraph examinations under this part by the DOE Psychophysiological Detection of Deception/Polygraph Program Quality Control Official.
( d ) To be certified under paragraph (c) of this section, an examiner must have the following minimum qualifications: ( 1 ) The examiner must be an experienced CI or criminal investigator with extensive additional training in using computerized instrumentation in Psychophysiological Detection of Deception and in psychology, physiology, interviewing, and interrogation.
( 2 ) The examiner must have a favorably adjudicated single-scope background investigation, complete a CI-scope polygraph examination, and must hold a “Q” access authorization, which is necessary for access to Secret Restricted Data and Top Secret National Security Information. In addition, he or she must have been granted SCI access approval.
( 3 ) The examiner must receive basic Forensic Psychophysiological Detection of Deception training from the DODPI.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Laurence Moskowitz, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Medialink Worldwide
Incorporated;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

      b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
      most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the
      case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
      likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

      b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.

Dated: May 17, 2004

/s/ Laurence Moskowitz
----------------------
Name: Laurence Moskowitz
Title: Chief Executive Officer
#### § 3700.332 What methods must I use to pass requirements down to participants at lower tiers with whom I intend to do business?

You as a participant must include a term or condition in lower-tier transactions requiring lower-tier participants to comply with subpart C of the OMB guidance in 2 CFR part 180.
Subpart 841.1 - General

Parent topic: PART 841 - ACQUISITION OF UTILITY SERVICES

841.102 Applicability.

(a) This part applies to purchases of utility services from nonregulated and regulated utility

suppliers when a delegation of authority from GSA for those services is requested and obtained.

(b)(4) The acquisition of energy, such as electricity, and natural or manufactured gas, when

purchased as a commodity is considered to be acquisitions of supplies rather than utility services as

described in FAR part 41.
#### GRIFFIN, Respondent, v. WHEATON, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

July 1, 1914.)

Action by George Griffin against Armond E. Wheaton.

No opinion. Order reversed, with costs to appellant, upon the ground that the amendments of the decision and judgment were not warranted by the findings.
#### § 3369.30 What policies and procedures must I follow?

The NEH policies and procedures that you must follow are the policies and procedures specified in each applicable section of the OMB guidance in subparts A through I of 2 CFR part 180, as that section is supplemented by the section in this part with the same section number. The contracts that are covered transactions, for example, are specified by section 220 of the OMB guidance (*i.e.*, 2 CFR 180.220) as supplemented by section 220 in this part (*i.e.*, § 3369.220). For any section of OMB guidance in subparts A through I of 2 CFR 180 that has no corresponding section in this part, NEH policies and procedures are those in the OMB guidance.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0583 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. TAYLOR JAY DAMM,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including February 12 , 202 4, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 5 2024

01/05/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0583
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1008 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1008

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to add meningococcal 
 vaccines to the list of taxable vaccines for purposes of the Vaccine 
                    Injury Compensation Trust Fund.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 12, 2005

 Mr. Santorum introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to add meningococcal 
 vaccines to the list of taxable vaccines for purposes of the Vaccine 
                    Injury Compensation Trust Fund.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADDITION OF MENINGOCOCCAL VACCINES TO LIST OF TAXABLE 
              VACCINES.

    (a) In General.--Section 4132(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 (defining taxable vaccine) is amended by adding at the end the 
following new subparagraph:
                    ``(O) Any meningococcal vaccine.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--
            (1) Sales, etc.--The amendment made by this section shall 
        apply to sales and uses on or after the first day of the first 
        month which begins more than 4 weeks after the date of the 
        enactment of this Act.
            (2) Deliveries.--For purposes of paragraph (1) and section 
        4131 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, in the case of sales 
        on or before the effective date described in such paragraph for 
        which delivery is made after such date, the delivery date shall 
        be considered the sale date.
                                 <all>
```
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 119 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on the Judiciary in 

the One Hundred Fifteenth Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2017 

Mr. GOODLATTE submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on 

the Judiciary in the One Hundred Fifteenth Congress. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 

3 For the expenses of the Committee on the Judiciary 

4 (hereafter in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Com5 mittee’’), including the expenses of all staff salaries, there 

6 shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts of the House 

7 of Representatives for committee salaries and expenses, 

8 not more than $16,382,000 for the One Hundred Fif9 teenth Congress. 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 119 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 

2 Of the amount specified in section 1— 

3 (1) not more than $8,053,500 shall be available 

4 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

5 noon on January 3, 2017, and ending immediately 

6 before noon on January 3, 2018; and 

7 (2) not more than $8,328,500 shall be available 

8 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

9 noon on January 3, 2018, and ending immediately 

10 before noon on January 3, 2019. 

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on 

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration. 

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall 

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 

19 the Committee on House Administration. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS