UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington,
D.C. 20549  FORM
10-K  (Mark
One)  ☒ANNUAL
                                         REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934  For
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022
or  ☐TRANSITION
                                         REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934  For
the transition period from _____ to _____
Commission file number of the issuing entity: 333-179413-01 Central
Index Key Number of the issuing entity: 0001571238  UBS-Barclays
Commercial Mortgage Trust 2013-C6  (exact
name of the issuing entity as specified in its charter)  Central
Index Key Number of the depositor: 0001541480  Barclays
Commercial Mortgage Securities LLC (exact
name of the depositor as specified in its charter)  Central
Index Key Number of the sponsor: 0000312070  Barclays
Bank PLC  (exact
name of the sponsor as specified in its charter)  Central
Index Key Number of the sponsor: 0001541886  UBS
Real Estate Securities Inc.  (exact
name of the sponsor as specified in its charter)  Central
Index Key Number of the sponsor: 0001567746  Redwood
Commercial Mortgage Corporation  (exact
name of the sponsor as specified in its charter)  Central
Index Key Number of the sponsor: 0001542256  Natixis
Real Estate Capital LLC (exact
name of the sponsor as specified in its charter)  New
                                         York
                                         (State or other jurisdiction of
                                         incorporation or organization of
        
        the
        issuing entity)
    27-010880
        
        (I.R.S.
        Employer
        
        Identification
Number)  c/o U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association as
Certificate Administrator  190
S. LaSalle Street  Chicago,
IL  (Address
of principal executive offices of the issuing entity)  60603  (Zip
Code)  Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code:  (212)
412-4000  Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:  Title
    of each class
    Trading
    Symbol(s)
    Name
    of each exchange on which registeredNone  Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None.  Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. ☐ Yes ☒ No  Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. ☐ Yes ☒
No  Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ☒ Yes ☐ No  Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant
to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that
the registrant was required to submit such files).  Not
applicable.  Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting
company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,”
“smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.   Large accelerated filer
    ☐
    Accelerated filer
    ☐Non-accelerated filer
    ☒  (Do not check if a smaller
    reporting company)
    Smaller reporting company
    ☐Emerging growth company
    ☐  If
an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for
complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐  Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness
of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered
public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐  If securities are
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error
to previously issued financial statements.  ☐  Indicate by check
mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers
during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b).  ☐  Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). ☐ Yes ☒ No  State
the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price
at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day
of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter.  Not
applicable.  Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. ☐ Yes ☐ No  Not
applicable.  Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.  Not
applicable.  DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE  List
hereunder the following documents if incorporated by reference and the Part of the Form 10-K (e.g., Part I, Part II, etc.) into
which the document is incorporated: (1) Any annual report to security holders; (2) Any proxy or information statement; and (3)
Any prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) or (c) under the Securities Act of 1933. The listed documents should be clearly described
for identification purposes (e.g., annual report to security holders for fiscal year ended December 24, 1980).  Not
applicable.   
  EXPLANATORY
NOTES  The
Exhibit Index describes exhibits provided by certain parties (in their capacities indicated on the Exhibit Index) with respect
to the Santa Anita Mall Mortgage Loan, which constituted approximately 5.4% of the asset pool of the issuing entity as of its
cut-off date.  The Santa Anita Mall Mortgage Loan is an asset of the issuing entity and is part of a loan combination that
includes the Santa Anita Mall Mortgage Loan and one other pari passu loan, which is not an asset of the issuing entity.
The other pari passu portion of the loan combination was securitized in the UBS-Barclays Commercial Mortgage Trust 2013-C5
transaction, Commission File Number 333-177354-05 (the “UBS-Barclays 2013-C5 Transaction”). This loan combination,
including the Santa Anita Mall Mortgage Loan, is being serviced and administered pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement
for the UBS-Barclays 2013-C5 Transaction, which is incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.2 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.  The
master servicer of a pooling and servicing agreement or trust and servicing agreement also functions as the primary servicer of
the related mortgage loans serviced and administered pursuant to such agreement unless a separate primary servicer is identified
herein. If this report does not identify a separate primary servicer, the servicer compliance statement provided by the master
servicer under any such agreement also encompasses its responsibilities as primary servicer of the related mortgage loan or mortgage
loans.  Midland
Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association is the master servicer of the mortgage loans serviced under the Pooling
and Servicing Agreement and the primary servicer and special servicer of the Santa Anita Mall Mortgage Loan. As a result, Midland
Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association is a “servicer” as defined in Item 1108(a)(2)(iii) of
Regulation AB, in the capacities described above, because it is servicing mortgage loans that constituted 10% or more of the assets
of the issuing entity as of its cut-off date. The assessments of compliance with applicable servicing criteria, accountants’
attestation reports and servicer compliance statements delivered by Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association
in the capacities described above are listed in the Exhibit Index.  The
assessment of compliance with applicable servicing criteria, accountants’ attestation report and servicer compliance statement
of the certificate administrator of the Santa Anita Mall Mortgage Loan is omitted from this Annual Report on Form 10-K as the
certificate administrator pursuant to the related pooling and servicing agreement or trust and servicing agreement does not perform
any activities that address servicing criteria with respect to the issuing entity and because it is not a “servicer”
that meets the criteria in Item 1108(a)(2)(i) through (iii) of Regulation AB.  PART
I  Item
1. Business.  Omitted.  Item
1A. Risk Factors.  Omitted.  Item
1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.  None.  Item
2. Properties.  Omitted.  Item
3. Legal Proceedings.  Omitted.  Item
4. Mine Safety Disclosures.  Not
applicable.  PART
II  Item
5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.  Omitted.  Item
6.  [Reserved]  Item
7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.  Omitted.  Item
7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.  Omitted.  Item
8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.  Omitted.  Item
9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.  Omitted.  Item
9A. Controls and Procedures.  Omitted.  Item
9B. Other Information.  None.  Item
9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections.  None.  PART
III  Item
10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.  Omitted.  Item
11. Executive Compensation.  Omitted.  Item
12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.  Omitted.  Item
13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.  Omitted.  Item
14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.  Omitted.  ADDITIONAL
DISCLOSURE ITEMS FOR REGULATION AB  Item
1112(b) of Regulation AB, Significant Obligor Financial Information.  The
Gateway Mortgage Loan (Loan # 1 on Annex A-1 of the prospectus supplement of the registrant relating to the issuing entity filed
on April 25, 2013 pursuant to Rule 424(b)(5)) constitutes a significant obligor within the meaning of Item 1101(k)(2) of Regulation
AB as disclosed in the prospectus supplement. In accordance with Item 1112(b) of Regulation AB, the most recent unaudited net
operating income of the significant obligor was $15,810,433.00 for the twelve- month period ended December 31, 2022.  Item
1114(b)(2) of Regulation AB, Significant Enhancement Provider Financial Information.  No
entity or group of affiliated entities provides any external credit enhancement or other support for the certificates within this
transaction as described under Item 1114(a) of Regulation AB.  Item
1115(b) of Regulation AB, Certain Derivatives Instruments (Financial Information).  No
entity or group of affiliated entities provides any derivative instruments or other support for the certificates within this transaction
as described under Item 1115 of Regulation AB.  Item
1117 of Regulation AB, Legal Proceedings.  The
registrant knows of no material pending legal proceeding involving the trust or any party related to the trust, other than routine
litigation incidental to the duties of those respective parties, and the following, with respect to U.S. Bank National Association,
as trustee, certificate administrator and custodian, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, certificate administrator
and custodian.  In
the last several years, U.S. Bank National Association (“U.S. Bank”) and other large financial institutions have been
sued in their capacity as trustee or successor trustee for certain residential mortgage backed securities (“RMBS”) trusts.
The complaints, primarily filed by investors or investor groups against U.S. Bank and similar institutions, allege the trustees
caused losses to investors as a result of alleged failures by the sponsors, mortgage loan sellers and servicers to comply with
the governing agreements for these RMBS trusts. Plaintiffs generally assert causes of action based upon the trustees’ purported
failures to enforce repurchase obligations of mortgage loan sellers for alleged breaches of representations and warranties, notify
securityholders of purported events of default allegedly caused by breaches of servicing standards by mortgage loan servicers
and abide by a heightened standard of care following alleged events of default.  U.S.
Bank denies liability and believes that it has performed its obligations under the RMBS trusts in good faith, that its actions
were not the cause of losses to investors, that it has meritorious defenses, and it has contested and intends to continue contesting
the plaintiffs’ claims vigorously. However, U.S. Bank cannot assure you as to the outcome of any of the litigation, or the
possible impact of these litigations on the trustee or the RMBS trusts.  On
March 9, 2018, a law firm purporting to represent fifteen Delaware statutory trusts (the “DSTs”) that issued securities
backed by student loans (the “Student Loans”) filed a lawsuit in the Delaware Court of Chancery against U.S. Bank
National Association (“U.S. Bank”) in its capacities as indenture trustee and successor special servicer, and three
other institutions in their respective transaction capacities, with respect to the DSTs and the Student Loans. This lawsuit is
captioned The National Collegiate Student Loan Master Trust I, et al. v. U.S. Bank National Association, et al., C.A. No. 2018-0167-JRS
(Del. Ch.) (the “NCMSLT Action”). The complaint, as amended on June 15, 2018, alleged that the DSTs have been harmed
as a result of purported misconduct or omissions by the defendants concerning administration of the trusts and special servicing
of the Student Loans. Since the filing of the NCMSLT Action, certain Student Loan borrowers have made assertions against U.S.
Bank concerning special servicing that appear to be based on certain allegations made on behalf of the DSTs in the NCMSLT Action.  U.S.
Bank believes that it has performed its obligations as indenture trustee and special servicer in good faith and in compliance
in all material respects with the terms of the agreements governing the DSTs (the “Governing Agreements”), and accordingly
that the claims against it in the NCMSLT Action are without merit.  U.S.
Bank has filed a motion seeking dismissal of the operative complaint in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Chancery Court
Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) or, in the alternative, a stay of the case while other prior filed disputes involving the DSTs and
the Student Loans are litigated. On November 7, 2018, the Court ruled that the case should be stayed in its entirety pending resolution
of the first-filed cases. On January 21, 2020, the Court entered an order consolidating for pretrial purposes the NCMSLT Action
and three other lawsuits pending in the Delaware Court of Chancery concerning the DSTs and the Student Loans (the “Consolidated
Action”). U.S. Bank and other parties to the Consolidated Action have briefed and argued motions for judgment on the pleadings
pursuant to Chancery Court Rule 12(c) regarding disputed issues of contractual interpretation at issue in one or more of the cases
comprising the Consolidated Action, including the NCMSLT Action. The Court has not yet ruled on these motions or on U.S. Bank’s
dismissal motion in the NCMSLT Action.  Deutsche
Bank Trust Company Americas (“DBTCA”) and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company (“DBNTC”) have been sued
by investors in civil litigation concerning their role as trustees of certain residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”)
trusts.  On
June 18, 2014, a group of investors, including funds managed by Blackrock Advisors, LLC, PIMCO-Advisors, L.P., and others, filed
an action against DBNTC and DBTCA in New York State Supreme Court alleging that DBNTC and DBTCA failed to perform purported duties,
as trustees for 544 private-label RMBS trusts, to enforce breaches of representations and warranties as to mortgage loans held
by the trusts and to enforce breaches by servicers of their mortgage loan servicing obligations for the trusts. During the course
of the litigation, plaintiffs dismissed the case from New York State Supreme Court and refiled two separate cases, one in the
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “BlackRockSDNY Case”) and the other in the
Superior Court of California, Orange County (the “BlackRockCalifornia Case”). Pursuant to a settlement among
the parties, the BlackRockSDNY Case was dismissed on December 6, 2018, and the BlackRockCalifornia Case was dismissed
on January 11, 2019.  On
September 27, 2017, DBTCA was added as a defendant to a case brought by certain special purpose entities including Phoenix Light
SF Limited in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, in which the plaintiffs previously alleged incorrectly
that DBNTC served as trustee for all 43 of the trusts at issue. On September 27, 2017, plaintiffs filed a third amended complaint
that names DBTCA as a defendant in addition to DBNTC. DBTCA serves as trustee for one of the 43 trusts at issue. DBNTC serves
as trustee for the other 42 trusts at issue. Plaintiffs’ third amended complaint brings claims for violation of the U.S.
Trust Indenture Act of 1939 (“TIA”); breach of contract; breach of fiduciary duty; negligence and gross negligence;
violation of New York’s Streit Act; and breach of the covenant of good faith. However, in the third amended complaint, plaintiffs
acknowledge that, before DBTCA was added to the case, the court dismissed plaintiffs’ TIA Act claims, negligence and gross
negligence claims, Streit Act claims, claims for breach of the covenant of good faith, and certain theories of plaintiffs’
breach of contract claims, and plaintiffs only include these claims to preserve any rights on appeal. Plaintiffs allege damages
of “hundreds of millions of dollars.” On November 13, 2017, DBNTC and DBTCA filed an answer to the third amended complaint.
On December 7, 2018, DBNTC and DBTCA filed a motion for summary judgment. Also on December 7, 2018, plaintiffs, jointly with Commerzbank
AG (see description of Commerzbank case below), filed a motion for partial summary judgment. On October 27, 2021, DBNTC and DBTCA
filed a supplemental motion for summary judgment relating to plaintiffs’ standing. On February 8, 2022, the court issued
an order in which it granted DBNTC and DBTCA’s supplemental motion for summary judgment, granted in part DBNTC and DBTCA’s
initial motion for summary judgment, and denied plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment. As a result of that order,
all of plaintiffs’ claims were dismissed with prejudice. On March 10, 2022, plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal to the United
States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit with respect to the court’s orders on the motions to dismiss and for summary
judgment.  On
November 30, 2017, DBTCA was added as a defendant to a case brought by Commerzbank AG (“Commerzbank”) in the U.S.
District Court for the Southern District of New York, in which Commerzbank previously alleged incorrectly that DBNTC served as
trustee for all 50 of the trusts at issue. On November 30, 2017, Commerzbank filed a second amended complaint that names DBTCA
as a defendant in addition to DBNTC. DBTCA serves as trustee for 1 of the 50 trusts at issue. DBNTC serves as trustee for the
other 49 trusts at issue. Commerzbank’s second amended complaint brings claims for violation of the TIA; breach of contract;
breach of fiduciary duty; negligence; violation of the Streit Act; and breach of the covenant of good faith. However, in the second
amended complaint, Commerzbank acknowledges that, before DBTCA was added to the case, the court dismissed Commerzbank’s
TIA claims for the trusts governed by pooling and servicing agreements, as well as its Streit Act claims and claims for breach
of the covenant of good faith, and Commerzbank only includes these claims to preserve any rights on appeal. The second amended
complaint alleges that DBNTC and DBTCA caused Commerzbank to suffer “hundreds of millions of dollars in losses,” but
the complaint does not include a demand for money damages in a sum certain. On January 29, 2018, DBNTC and DBTCA filed an answer
to the second amended complaint. On December 7, 2018, DBNTC and DBTCA filed a motion for summary judgment. Also on December 7,
2018, Commerzbank, jointly with the Phoenix Lightplaintiffs, filed a motion for partial summary judgment. On February
8, 2022, the court issued an order in which it granted in part DBNTC and DBTCA’s motion for summary judgment and denied
plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment. As a result of that order, many of plaintiffs’ claims and theories
were dismissed with prejudice. Discovery is ongoing.  On
December 30, 2015, IKB International, S.A. in Liquidation and IKB Deutsche Industriebank A.G. (collectively, “IKB”),
as an investor in 37 RMBS trusts, filed a summons with notice in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County,
against DBNTC and DBTCA as trustees of the trusts. On May 27, 2016, IKB served its complaint asserting claims for breach of contract,
breach of fiduciary duty, breach of duty to avoid conflicts of interest, violation of the Streit Act, violation of the TIA, violation
of Regulation AB, and violation of Section 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code. IKB alleges that DBNTC and DBTCA are liable for over
U.S. $268 million in damages. On October 5, 2016, DBNTC and DBTCA, together with several other trustees defending lawsuits by
IKB, filed a joint motion to dismiss. On January 6, 2017 and June 20, 2017, IKB voluntarily dismissed with prejudice all claims
as to seven trusts. On January 27, 2021, the court granted in part and denied in part DBNTC and DBTCA’s motion to dismiss.
The court granted the motion to dismiss with respect to IKB’s claims for violations of the Streit Act, Regulation AB, and
Section 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code, as well as certain aspects of IKB’s claims for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary
duty, and violation of the TIA. The court denied the remainder of the motion to dismiss. IKB’s remaining claims for breach
of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of duty to avoid conflicts of interest, and violation of the TIA will proceed. On
May 10, 2021, DBNTC and DBTCA filed a notice of appeal with the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division, First Department, regarding
certain aspects of the court’s order on the motion to dismiss. On May 20, 2021, IKB filed a notice of cross appeal with
respect to other aspects of that order. On August 30, 2022, the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department affirmed
in part and reversed in part the court’s order on the motion to dismiss. On November 10, 2022, the First Department granted
DBNTC and DBTCA’s motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, and denied IKB’s separate motion for reargument
and leave to appeal. On June 2, 2021, IKB filed a motion for re-argument regarding certain aspects of the court’s order
on the motion to dismiss, which the court denied on August 3, 2021. On May 13, 2021, DBNTC and DBTCA filed an answer to the complaint.
On October 28, 2021, the parties filed a stipulation, voluntarily dismissing with prejudice all claims as to seven additional
trusts. On December 29, 2021, the parties filed a stipulation, voluntarily dismissing with prejudice all claims as to one additional
trust. On April 22, 2022, the parties filed a stipulation, voluntarily dismissing with prejudice all claims as to 17 certificates
at issue (including all claims as to 5 trusts), leaving 17 trusts at issue. Discovery is ongoing.  It
is DBTCA’s belief that it has no pending legal proceedings (including, based on DBTCA’s present evaluation, the litigation
disclosed in the foregoing paragraphs) that would materially affect its ability to perform its duties under the related servicing
agreement.  Item
1119 of Regulation AB, Affiliations and Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.  The
information regarding this Item has been previously provided in a prospectus supplement of the Registrant relating to the issuing
entity filed on April 25, 2013 pursuant to Rule 424(b)(5).  Item
1122 of Regulation AB, Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria.  The
reports on assessments of compliance with the servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and related attestation reports on
such assessments of compliance with respect to the mortgage loans are attached hereto under Item 15 to this Annual Report on Form
10-K. Attached as Schedule II to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.1 to this Annual Report
on Form 10-K is a chart identifying the entities participating in a servicing function for the transaction responsible for each
applicable servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d).  The
reports on assessments of compliance with the servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and related attestation reports on
such assessments of compliance with respect to the Santa Anita Mall Mortgage Loan, which is being serviced and administered pursuant
to the pooling and servicing agreement for the UBS-Barclays 2013-C5 Transaction, are attached hereto under Item 15 to this Annual
Report on Form 10-K. Attached as Schedule II to the pooling and servicing agreement for the UBS-Barclays 2013-C5 Transaction incorporated
by reference as Exhibit 4.2 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K is a chart identifying the entities participating in a servicing
function for the UBS-Barclays 2013-C5 Transaction responsible for each applicable servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d).  Item
1123 of Regulation AB, Servicer Compliance Statement.  The
servicer compliance statements are attached as Exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.  PART
IV  Item
15. Exhibit and Financial Statement Schedules  (a)
The following is a list of documents filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:  (1)
Not applicable  (2)
Not applicable  (3)
See below  4.1Pooling
                                         and Servicing Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2013, by and among Barclays Commercial
                                         Mortgage Securities LLC, as Depositor, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank,
                                         National Association, as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer,
                                         Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor and U.S. Bank National Association,
                                         as Trustee, Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian (filed as Exhibit 4
                                         to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on May 15, 2013 under Commission
                                         File No. 333-179413-01 and incorporated by reference herein).  4.2Pooling
                                         and Servicing Agreement, dated as of February 1, 2013, by and among UBS Commercial Mortgage
                                         Securitization Corp., as Depositor, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National
                                         Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National
                                         Association, as Special Servicer, Situs Holdings, LLC, as Operating Advisor and Deutsche
                                         Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and
                                         Custodian (filed as Exhibit 4 to the UBS Commercial Mortgage Securitization Corp.’s
                                         Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 28, 2013 under Commission File No. 333-177354-05
                                         and incorporated by reference herein).  31Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.  33Reports
                                         on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities.  33.1Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer  33.2Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer  33.3U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee and Certificate Administrator prior to October 17, 2022  33.4U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, as Trustee and Certificate Administrator on and after October 17, 2022 (see Exhibit 33.3)  33.5U.S. Bank National Association, as Custodian (see Exhibit 33.3)  33.6Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor  33.7Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Primary Servicer of the Santa Anita Mall Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.1)  33.8Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer of the Santa Anita Mall Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.1)  33.9Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee and Custodian of the Santa Anita Mall Mortgage Loan  33.10Situs Holdings, LLC, as Operating Advisor of the Santa Anita Mall Mortgage Loan  34Attestation
                                         reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities.  34.1Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer  34.2Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer  34.3U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee and Certificate Administrator prior to October 17, 2022  34.4U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, as Trustee and Certificate Administrator on and after October 17, 2022 (see Exhibit 34.3)  34.5U.S. Bank National Association, as Custodian (see Exhibit 34.3)  34.6Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor  34.7Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Primary Servicer of the Santa Anita Mall Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.1)  34.8Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer of the Santa Anita Mall Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.1)  34.9Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee and Custodian of the Santa Anita Mall Mortgage Loan  34.10Situs Holdings, LLC, as Operating Advisor of the Santa Anita Mall Mortgage Loan  35Servicer
                                         compliance statements.  35.1Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer  35.2Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer  35.3U.S. Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator prior to October 17, 2022  35.4U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, as Certificate Administrator on and after October 17, 2022 (see Exhibit 35.3)  35.5Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Primary Servicer of the Santa Anita Mall Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 35.1)  35.6Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer of the Santa Anita Mall Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 35.1)  99.1Mortgage
                                         Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 25, 2013, between Barclays Commercial Mortgage
                                         Securities LLC and Barclays Bank PLC (filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the registrant’s
                                         Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 25, 2013 under Commission File No. 333-179413-01
                                         and incorporated by reference herein)  99.2Mortgage
                                         Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 25, 2013, between Barclays Commercial Mortgage
                                         Securities LLC and UBS Real Estate Securities Inc. (filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the registrant’s
                                         Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 25, 2013 under Commission File No. 333-179413-01
                                         and incorporated by reference herein)  99.3Mortgage
                                         Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 25, 2013, among Barclays Commercial Mortgage
                                         Securities LLC and Redwood Commercial Mortgage Corporation (filed as Exhibit 99.3 to
                                         the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 25, 2013 under Commission
                                         File No. 333-179413-01 and incorporated by reference herein)  99.4Mortgage
                                         Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 25, 2013, between Barclays Commercial Mortgage
                                         Securities LLC and Natixis Real Estate Capital LLC (filed as Exhibit 99.4 to the registrant’s
                                         Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 25, 2013 under Commission File No. 333-179413-01
                                         and incorporated by reference herein)  (b)       The
exhibits required to be filed by the Registrant pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K are listed above.  (c)       Not
Applicable.  SIGNATURES  Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report
to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.  Barclays
Commercial Mortgage Securities LLC
(Depositor)  /s/
Daniel Vinson  Daniel
Vinson, Chief Executive Officer  (senior
officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)   Date:
March 27, 2023