alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                           3,661
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,453
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        397
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,960
<PP&E>                                          97,179
<DEPRECIATION>                                  30,256
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  75,067
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,642
<BONDS>                                         51,660
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,512
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    75,067
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                35,181
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,202
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,640
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    339
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       339
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.10)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Applies to Class A Unitholders only. Class B Unitholders primary EPS is .92.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
§ 431.382 Prohibited acts. ( a ) Each of the following is a prohibited act under sections 332 and 345 of the Act: ( 1 ) Distribution in commerce by a manufacturer or private labeler of any “new covered equipment” which is not labeled in accordance with an applicable labeling rule prescribed in accordance with Section 344 of the Act, and in this part;
( 2 ) Removal from any “new covered equipment” or rendering illegible, by a manufacturer, distributor, retailer, or private labeler, of any label required under this part to be provided with such covered equipment;
( 3 ) Failure to permit access to, or copying of records required to be supplied under the Act and this part, or failure to make reports or provide other information required to be supplied under the Act and this part;
( 4 ) Advertisement of an electric motor or motors, by a manufacturer, distributor, retailer, or private labeler, in a catalog from which the equipment may be purchased, without including in the catalog all information as required by § 431.31(b)(1), provided, however, that this shall not apply to an advertisement of an electric motor in a catalog if distribution of the catalog began before the effective date of the labeling rule applicable to that motor;
( 5 ) Failure of a manufacturer to supply at his expense a reasonable number of units of covered equipment to a test laboratory designated by the Secretary;
( 6 ) Failure of a manufacturer to permit a representative designated by the Secretary to observe any testing required by the Act and this part, and to inspect the results of such testing; and
( 7 ) Distribution in commerce by a manufacturer or private labeler of any new covered equipment which is not in compliance with an applicable energy efficiency standard prescribed under the Act and this part.
( b ) In accordance with sections 333 and 345 of the Act, any person who knowingly violates any provision of paragraph (a) of this section may be subject to assessment of a civil penalty of no more than $560 for each violation.
( c ) For purposes of this section: ( 1 ) The term “new covered equipment” means covered equipment the title of which has not passed to a purchaser who buys such product for purposes other than: ( i ) Reselling it; or
( ii ) Leasing it for a period in excess of one year; and
( 2 ) The term “knowingly” means: ( i ) Having actual knowledge; or
( ii ) Presumed to have knowledge deemed to be possessed by a reasonable person who acts in the circumstances, including knowledge obtainable upon the exercise of due care.
[69 FR 61941, Oct. 21, 2004. Redesignated at 70 FR 60416, Oct. 18, 2005, as amended at 79 FR 19, Jan. 2, 2014; 81 FR 41794, June 28, 2016; 81 FR 96351, Dec. 30, 2016; 83 FR 1291, Jan. 11, 2018; 83 FR 66083, Dec. 26, 2018; 85 FR 830, Jan. 8, 2020; 86 FR 2955, Jan. 14, 2021; 87 FR 1063, Jan. 10, 2022; 88 FR 2193, Jan. 13, 2023; 89 FR 1028, Jan. 9, 2024]
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 23

- 00195

- CR

R AYMOND E DWARD L UMSDEN

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 211th District

Court

of Denton County ( F15

- 1103

- 211 )

February 29, 2024

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice

Sudderth

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was n o err or in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth
Editorial Note on Part 63
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 63 appear at 81 FR 86909, Dec. 2, 2016.

§ 63.41 Standards for issuance of a license. A license to receive and possess source, special nuclear, or byproduct material at a geologic repository operations area at the Yucca Mountain site may be issued by the Commission on finding that— ( a ) Construction of the geologic repository operations area has been substantially completed in conformity with the application as amended, the provisions of the Atomic Energy Act, and the rules and regulations of the Commission. Construction may be considered substantially complete for the purposes of this paragraph if the construction of— ( 1 ) Surface and interconnecting structures, systems, and components; and
( 2 ) Any underground storage space required for initial operation, are substantially complete.
( b ) The activities to be conducted at the geologic repository operations area will be in conformity with the application as amended, the provisions of the Atomic Energy Act and the Energy Reorganization Act, and the rules and regulations of the Commission.
( c ) The issuance of the license will not be inimical to the common defense and security and will not constitute an unreasonable risk to the health and safety of the public.
( d ) Adequate protective measures can and will be taken in the event of a radiological emergency at any time before permanent closure and decontamination or decontamination and dismantlement of surface facilities.
( e ) All applicable requirements of part 51 of this chapter have been satisfied.
###### Editorial Note on Part 72

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 72 appear at 80 FR 74981, Dec. 1, 2015, and at 81 FR 86910, Dec. 2, 2016.

#### § 72.152 Document control.

The licensee, applicant for a license, certificate holder, and applicant for a CoC shall establish measures to control the issuance of documents such as instructions, procedures, and drawings, including changes, which prescribe all activities affecting quality. These measures must assure that documents, including changes, are reviewed for adequacy, approved for release by authorized personnel, and distributed and used at the location where the prescribed activity is performed. These measures must ensure that changes to documents are reviewed and approved.
# EUR-Lex - 31992D0485 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31992D0485

**92/485/EEC: Commission Decision of 25 September 1992 amending Decision 87/119/EEC as regards the list of establishments in Brazil approved for the purpose of importing meat products into the Community **

*
Official Journal L 290 , 06/10/1992 P. 0013 - 0014 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 25 September 1992 amending Decision 87/119/EEC as regards the list of establishments in Brazil approved for the purpose of importing meat products into the Community (92/485/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 72/462/EEC of 12 December 1972 on health and veterinary inspection problems upon importation of bovine, ovine and caprine animals and swine, fresh meat or meat products from third countries (1), as last amended by Council Regulation (EEC) No 3763/91 (2), and in particular Article 4 (1) thereof,

Whereas a list of establishments in Brazil, approved for the purpose of importing meat products into the Community, was drawn up initially by Commission Decision 87/119/EEC (3), as last amended by Decision 92/257/EEC (4);

Whereas a Community on-the-spot visit to meat product establishments in Brazil has revealed that the level of hygiene in one establishment was altered since the last inspection;

Whereas the list of establishments should be amended accordingly;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Annex to Decision 87/119/EEC is hereby replaced by the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States. Done at Brussels, 25 September 1992. For the Commission

Ray MAC SHARRY

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 302, 31. 12. 1972, p. 28. (2) OJ No L 356, 24. 12. 1991, p. 1. (3) OJ No L 49, 18. 2. 1987, p. 37. (4) OJ No L 128, 14. 5. 1992, p. 30.

ANNEX

LIST OF ESTABLISHMENTS

Approval No Establishment Address SIF 7 Swift Armour SA Indústria e Comércio Santana do Livramento, Rio Grande do Sul SIF 10 Swift Armour SA Indústria e Comércio Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo SIF 34 Perdigao Agroindustrial SA S. André, Sao Paulo SIF 76 SA Frigorífico Anglo Barretos, Sao Paulo SIF 226 BE Comércio e Indústria, Importaçao e Exportaçao SA Bagé, Rio Grande do Sul SIF 337 Frigorífico Bertin Ltda Lins, Sao Paulo SIF 381 Frigorífico Kaiowa SA Guarulhos, Sao Paulo SIF 385 Frigorífico Mouran Ltda Andradina, Sao Paulo SIF 458 Swift Armour SA, Indústria e Comércio Presidente Epitácio, Sao Paulo SIF 736 Sola SA Indústrias Alimentícias Três Rios, Rio de Janeiro SIF 1676 UA - Comércio e Indústria SA Uberlândia, Minas Gerais SIF 2015 Sadia Oeste SA Indústria e Comércio Várzea Grande, Mato Grosso
#### § 376.332 What methods must I use to pass requirements down to participants at lower tiers with whom I intend to do business?

To communicate the requirements to lower-tier participants, you must include a term or condition in the lower-tier transaction requiring the lower-tier participant's compliance with 2 CFR part 180, as supplemented by this subpart.
# EUR-Lex - 31992D0424 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31992D0424

**92/424/EEC: Commission Decision of 23 July 1992 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Directive 91/496/EEC as regards identity checks on animals from third countries **

*
Official Journal L 232 , 14/08/1992 P. 0034 - 0034 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 44 P. 0168 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 44 P. 0168 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 23 July 1992 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Directive 91/496/EEC as regards identity checks on animals from third countries (92/424/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 91/496/EEC of 15 July 1991 laying down the principles governing the organization of veterinary checks on animals entering the Community from third countries and amending Directives 89/662/EEC, 90/425/EEC and 90/675/EEC (1), as amended by Directive 91/628/EEC (2), and in particular Article 4 (5) thereof,

Whereas, with regard to the identity checks referred to in Article 4 (1) of Directive 91/496/EEC, the circumstances in which systematic checks need not be carried out should be defined;

Whereas this Decision will be reviewed in the light of experience gained;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

1. Identity checks must be carried out on each animal in a consignment.

2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, identity checks may be carried out on 10 % of the animals in a consignment with a minimum of 10 animals representative of the whole consignment checked per consignment, where the consignment contains a large number of animals.

The number of animals checked must be increased and may reach the totality of the animals concerned, if the initial checks carried out have not been satisfactory.

3. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, for animals for which individual marking is not provided for by Community rules, identity checks must consist of a check on the marking of a representative number of packages and/or containers.

The number of packages and/or containers checked must be increased and may reach the totality of the packages and/or containers concerned, if the initial checks carried out have not been satisfactory.

The identity check comprises a visual check of the animals contained in a representative number of packages and/or containers, for the verification of the species thereof.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States. Done at Brussels, 23 July 1992. For the Commission

Ray MAC SHARRY

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 268, 24. 9. 1991, p. 56. (2) OJ No L 340, 11. 12. 1991, p. 17.
Exhibit 35.8








2015 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance
(Item 1123)





Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Pooling
and Servicing Agreement”) dated as of January 1, 2013 by and among Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation as
Depositor, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC
as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Trustee, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate
Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC as Operating Advisor relating to the COMM 2013-LC6
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates (COMM 2013-LC6 )





The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors,
LLC, as special servicer (the “Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:



| | 1. | All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of
January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”) in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement
has been conducted under my supervision.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of
its obligations under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects for the Reporting Period and if
there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and status thereof
has been specifically identified herein.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------









|Certified by: | /s/ Adam Singer                |  | Date:  March 1, 2016
|------------- | ------------------------------ |  | --------------------
|              | Adam Singer, Managing Director |  |                     
|              |                                |  |
§ 905.22 How does Western periodically evaluate customer actions? ( a ) *Periodic review of customer actions.* Western will periodically evaluate customer actions to determine whether they are consistent with the approved IRP or minimum investment report. Small customer plans and EE/RE reports are not subject to this periodic review.
( b ) *Reviewing representative samples of plans and reports.* Western will periodically review a representative sample of IRPs and minimum investment reports, and the customer's implementation of the applicable plan or report from each of Western's Regions. The samples will reflect the diverse characteristics and circumstances of the customers that purchase power from Western. These reviews will be in addition to, and separate and apart from, the review of initial and updated IRPs and minimum investment reports to ensure compliance with this subpart.
( c ) *Scope of periodic reviews.* Periodic reviews may consist of any combination of review of the customer's annual IRP progress reports, minimum investment letters, telephone interviews, or on-site visits. Western will document these periodic reviews and may report on the results of the reviews in Western's annual report.
§ 417.610 What procedures does a Federal agency use in suspension and debarment actions? In deciding whether to suspend or debar you, a Federal agency handles the actions as informally as practicable, consistent with principles of fundamental fairness. ( a ) For suspension actions, a Federal agency uses the procedures in this subpart and subpart G of this part.
( b ) For debarment actions, a Federal agency uses the procedures in this subpart and subpart H of this part.
§ 3485.137 May the Department grant an exception to let an excluded person participate in a covered transaction? ( a ) Yes, the Secretary delegates to the ED Deciding Official the authority under this section to grant an exception permitting an excluded person to participate in a particular covered transaction.
( b ) If the ED Deciding Official grants an exception, the exception must be in writing and state the reason(s) for deviating from the Governmentwide policy in Executive Order 12549.
(Authority: E.O. 12549 (3 CFR 1986 Comp., p. 189); E.O. 12689 (3 CFR 1989 Comp., p. 235); sec. 2455, Pub. L. 103-355, 108 Stat. 3327 (31 U.S.C. 6101 note); 20 U.S.C. 1082, 1094, 1221e-3, and 3474)
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear at 68 FR 24879, May 9, 2003, and at 88 FR 45064, July 14, 2023.

§ 10.203 Definitions. ( a ) *Public administrative proceeding* as used in this guideline means any FDA proceeding which the public has a right to attend. This includes a formal evidentiary public hearing as set forth in part 12, a public hearing before a Public Board of Inquiry as set forth in part 13, a public hearing before a Public Advisory Committee as set forth in part 14, a public hearing before the Commissioner as set forth in part 15, a regulatory hearing before FDA as set forth in part 16, consumer exchange meetings, and Commissioner's public meetings with health professionals.
( b ) *Advance notice* as used in this guideline means written or telephone notification to FDA's Office of Public Affairs (Press Relations Staff) of intent to electronically record an agency public administrative proceeding.
( c ) *Electronic recording* as used in this guideline means any visual or audio recording made by videotape recording equipment or moving film camera, and/or other electronic recording equipment.
[49 FR 14726, Apr. 13, 1984, as amended at 54 FR 9035, Mar. 3, 1989]
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 233 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                  House Calendar No. 29
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 233

                          [Report No. 115-64]

   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1431) to amend the 
 Environmental Research, Development, and Demonstration Authorization 
      Act of 1978 to provide for Scientific Advisory Board member 
     qualifications, public participation, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 28, 2017

   Mr. Newhouse, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1431) to amend the 
 Environmental Research, Development, and Demonstration Authorization 
      Act of 1978 to provide for Scientific Advisory Board member 
     qualifications, public participation, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 1431) to amend the 
Environmental Research, Development, and Demonstration Authorization 
Act of 1978 to provide for Scientific Advisory Board member 
qualifications, public participation, and for other purposes. All 
points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. The bill 
shall be considered as read. All points of order against provisions in 
the bill are waived. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the bill and on any amendment thereto to final passage 
without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally 
divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the 
Committee on Science, Space, and Technology; and (2) one motion to 
recommit.
                                                  House Calendar No. 29

115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 233

                          [Report No. 115-64]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1431) to amend the 
 Environmental Research, Development, and Demonstration Authorization 
      Act of 1978 to provide for Scientific Advisory Board member 
     qualifications, public participation, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 28, 2017

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```