alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 494 

Expressing support for the designation of August 22, 2017, as national 

‘‘Chuck Brown Day’’ and honoring his contributions to music and to 

the District of Columbia. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 28, 2017 

Ms. NORTON submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of August 22, 2017, 

as national ‘‘Chuck Brown Day’’ and honoring his contributions to music and to the District of Columbia. 

Whereas Chuck Brown is known as the ‘‘Godfather of GoGo’’ because he was the major architect of the musical 

genre known as go-go, a unique mix of funk, soul, and 

Latin party sounds; 

Whereas Chuck Brown, who was born on August 22, 1936, 

and passed away at the age of 75 on May 16, 2012, was 

a resident of the District of Columbia most of his life; 

Whereas Chuck Brown, who taught himself to play guitar, 

became a virtuoso singer, songwriter, guitarist, and band 

leader; 


dlhill on DSKBC4BHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 494 IH 

Whereas Chuck Brown’s go-go beat gave the District of Columbia a musical identity of its own and reminds the Nation that Washington, DC, has always been the hometown of talented artists, such as Duke Ellington and 

Marvin Gaye; 

Whereas Chuck Brown’s musical catalogue spans 22 studio 

albums over 3 decades; 

Whereas Chuck Brown’s hit ‘‘Bustin’ Loose’’, with his group, 

the Soul Searchers, was the top song on the Billboard 

Top 100 R&B Chart for 4 weeks in 1979; 

Whereas Chuck Brown earned a Grammy nomination in 2010 

for the song ‘‘Love’’, from his album entitled ‘‘We Got 

This’’, and was awarded a National Endowment for the 

Arts National Heritage Fellowship in 2005; 

Whereas Chuck Brown’s go-go has been passed from generation to generation with undiminished popularity; 

Whereas Chuck Brown influenced jazz, rap, and go-go musicians, such as the bands Trouble Funk, Rare Essence, 

and Experience Unlimited (also known as E.U.); 

Whereas Chuck Brown was so committed to securing statehood and equal voting rights for the residents of the District of Columbia that he played a concert on a very hot, 

humid day on the United States Capitol grounds in 2010; 

Whereas the District of Columbia has named a street located 

near the historic, modernized Howard Theatre for Chuck 

Brown; 

Whereas the District of Columbia has named a park located 

at 2901 20th Street, NE, for Chuck Brown; 


dlhill on DSKBC4BHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 494 IH 

Whereas Chuck Brown is admired for having risen from 

humble beginnings and overcoming time in prison to become a devoted father and family man; 

Whereas Chuck Brown was a great, multitalented musician 

who brought joy through his music, never stopping until 

his death; and 

Whereas August 22, 2017, is Chuck Brown’s birthday: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

2 the designation of ‘‘Chuck Brown Day’’ and honors Chuck 

3 Brown’s contributions to music and to the District of Co4 lumbia. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSKBC4BHB2PROD with BILLS
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 9, 2010 

d0830 

Order 

 

September 9, 2010 

141134 

PATRICE ANN TURKETTE, 

Plaintiff/CounterDefendant/Appellee, 

v SC: 141134 

 COA: 287695 

Grand Traverse CC: 

JEFFREY JOSEPH TURKETTE, 07-005262-DM 

Defendant/CounterPlaintiff/Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 23, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
§ 700.11 Contracting with small and minority businesses, women's business enterprises, and labor surplus area firms. ( a ) Make information on forthcoming opportunities available and arrange time frames for purchases and contracts to encourage and facilitate participation by small businesses, minority-owned firms, and women's business enterprises. To permit USAID, in accordance with the small business provisions of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as amended, to give United States small business firms an opportunity to participate in supplying commodities and services procured under the award, the recipient must to the maximum extent possible provide the following information to the Office of Small Disadvantaged Business Utilization (OSDBU), USAID, Washington, DC 20523, at least 45 days prior to placing any order or contract in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold: ( 1 ) Brief general description and quantity of goods or services;
( 2 ) Closing date for receiving quotations, proposals or bids; and
( 3 ) Address where solicitations or specifications can be obtained.
( b ) [Reserved]
§ 111.570 Under this subpart O, what records must you make and keep? ( a ) You must make and keep the records required under this subpart O in accordance with subpart P of this part.
( b ) You must make and keep the following records: ( 1 ) Written procedures for fulfilling the requirements of this subpart,
( 2 ) A written record of every product complaint that is related to good manufacturing practice, ( i ) The person who performs the requirements of this subpart must document, at the time of performance, that the requirement was performed.
( ii ) The written record of the product complaint must include the following: ( A ) The name and description of the dietary supplement;
( B ) The batch, lot, or control number of the dietary supplement, if available;
( C ) The date the complaint was received and the name, address, or telephone number of the complainant, if available;
( D ) The nature of the complaint including, if known, how the product was used;
( E ) The reply to the complainant, if any; and
( F ) Findings of the investigation and followup action taken when an investigation is performed.
37970.

#### STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT v. YEAGER.

Gardner, Presiding Judge.

1. A motion to dismiss the appeal of the condemnor from the award of the assessors was made by the condemnee Yeager, and sustained by the Judge of the Superior Court of Douglas County, and that judgment is here *18assigned as error. Insofar as the motion to dismiss is based on the contention that it is a condition precedent to the appeal that the condemnation money be first tendered by the condemnor to the .condemnee and refused before it may legally be paid into the registry of the court, this has been decided contrary to the contentions of the appellee in *State Highway Dept. v. Hendrix,*215 Ga. 821 (113 S. E. 2d 761) and *State Highway Dept. v. Taylor,*ante.

Decided June 30, 1960.

*Eugene Cook, Attorney-General, Paul Miller, Assistant Attorney-General, Eugene B. Brown, Walter B. Fincher,*for plaintiff in error.

*George T. Bagby, William Hall, D. S. Strickland,*contra.

2. The motion to dismiss contains another ground to the effect that at or before the time when the appeal was filed on December 12, 1958, following the assessors’ award of December 8, the condemnor presented to the clerk of the superior court as a tender of the amount awarded a county voucher dated December 2, 1958, with the request that the clerk hold the voucher because there were no county funds at the time with which to pay it, and that for this reason the appeal should be dismissed. Evidence was introduced at the hearing on the motion to dismiss, at which hearing the undisputed testimony was to the effect that there had been no request to the clerk to hold the check because of insufficient funds to cover it; that as a matter of fact, as shown by a bank statement introduced in evidence, the county at all times between December 12, when the appeal was filed, and December 18, the tenth day following the award of the assessors, there were in the bank sufficient funds to meet the check, and that the check was actually presented to the bank by the clerk of court and paid on December 18, 1958. It accordingly follows that these grounds of the motion to dismiss were not sustained by proof.

The judge of the superior court erred in granting the motion to dismiss the appeal of the condemnor.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Townsend and Carlisle, JJ., concur.*
#### Frank Rand, Respondent, v Carmela Rand, Appellant.

[816 NYS2d 542]

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals from stated portions of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Gartenstein, J.H.O.), entered September 27, 2004, which, after a nonjury trial, inter alia, (1) valued the marital portion of the plaintiffs TIAA-CREF pension at the sum of only $308,761, from which she was awarded a one-half share, (2) directed the plaintiff to pay child support to her in the sum of only $368 per week, (3) valued the net proceeds of the sale of a cooperative apartment at the sum of only $60,000, and (4) declined to provide for college tuition for the children, in effect, without prejudice to renewal if either child attends college.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly concluded that the pre-tax $438,000 withdrawn by the plaintiff from his TIAA-CREF pension fund did not constitute waste or a dissipation of the parties’ assets. The record supports the Supreme Court’s finding that the plaintiff used the funds to pay legitimate expenses, much of which took the form of marital debts *(see K. v B.,*13 AD3d 12, 29 [2004]; *Gonzalez v Gonzalez,*291 AD2d 373, 374 [2002]; *Harbour v Harbour,*227 AD2d 882, 883-884 [1996]). Having rejected the defendant’s dissipation claim, the Supreme Court, using stipulated values, properly, indeed excessively, calculated the amount of the marital share.

In determining child support, the court may impute income based on a party’s past income or earning potential *(see Nebons v Nebons,*26 AD3d 478 [2006]; *Kalish v Kalish,*289 AD2d 202, 203 [2001]; *cf. Gezelter v Shoshani,*283 AD2d 455, 456 [2001]). Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the determination to *977impute the plaintiffs income at a level equal to his last year of salaried earnings was a proper exercise of the Supreme Court’s discretion.

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Crane, J.P., Goldstein, Luciano and Dillon, JJ., concur.
§ 200.418 Costs incurred by states and local governments. Costs incurred or paid by a state or local government on behalf of its IHEs for fringe benefit programs, such as pension costs and FICA and any other costs specifically incurred on behalf of, and in direct benefit to, the IHEs, are allowable costs of such IHEs whether or not these costs are recorded in the accounting records of the institutions, subject to the following: ( a ) The costs meet the requirements of § 200.402-411 of this subpart;
( b ) The costs are properly supported by approved cost allocation plans in accordance with applicable Federal cost accounting principles in this part; and
( c ) The costs are not otherwise borne directly or indirectly by the Federal Government.
[78 FR 78608, Dec. 26, 2013, as amended at 85 FR 49564, Aug. 13, 2020]
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed June 19, 2024.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D23-0954

Lower Tribunal No. 20-18629

________________

Imperial Air Services, Inc., et al.,

Appellants,

vs.

Christian Flores,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, David C. 

Miller, Judge.

Houston Roderman, PLLC, and Bart A. Houston (Fort Lauderdale), for 

appellants.

Sasha Bardelas, P.A., and Sasha Bardelas, for appellee.

Before EMAS, SCALES and MILLER, JJ. 

PER CURIAM. 
2

Affirmed. See § 48.081(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2020) (“As an 

alternative to [the hierarchical service on corporate officers pursuant to 

section 48.081(1)-(2)], process may be served on the agent designated by 

the corporation under s. 48.091. However, if service cannot be made on 

a registered agent because of failure to comply with s. 48.091, service 

of process shall be permitted on any employee at the corporation's 

principal place of business or on any employee of the registered agent. 

A person attempting to serve process pursuant to this paragraph may serve 

the process on any employee of the registered agent during the first attempt 

at service even if the registered agent is temporarily absent from his or her 

office.”) (emphasis added); § 48.091(2), Fla. Stat. (2020) (“Every corporation 

shall keep the registered office open from 10 a.m. to 12 noon each day 

except Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays, and shall keep one or more 

registered agents on whom process may be served at the office during these 

hours. The corporation shall keep a sign posted in the office in some 

conspicuous place designating the name of the corporation and the name of 

its registered agent on whom process may be served.”) See also Zarate v. 

Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr. Co., 81 So. 3d 556, 557 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (“An 

appellant has the burden to present a record that will overcome the 

presumption of the correctness of the trial court's findings.”); 1321 Whitfield, 
3

LLC v. Silverman, 67 So. 3d 435, 437 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (“We are unable 

to meaningfully review these findings because there is no transcript of the 

hearing on [appellant]’s motion to quash service of process.”) (citing 

Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 

(Fla.1979)) (“When there are issues of fact the appellant necessarily asks 

the reviewing court to draw conclusions about the evidence. Without a record 

of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the 

underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is 

not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory. Without knowing 

the factual context, neither can an appellate court reasonably conclude that 

the trial judge so misconceived the law as to require reversal. The trial court 

should have been affirmed because the record brought forward by the 

appellant is inadequate to demonstrate reversible error.”)
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 643 

Directing the Attorney General to submit to the House of Representatives 

all documents in the possession of the Attorney General relating to 

warrantless electronic surveillance of telephone conversations and electronic communications of persons in the United States conducted by 

the National Security Agency. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 22, 2005 

Mr. CONYERS (for himself, Mr. BERMAN, Mr. BOUCHER, Mr. NADLER, Mr. 

SCOTT of Virginia, Ms. ZOE LOFGREN of California, Ms. JACKSON-LEE

of Texas, Ms. WATERS, Mr. MEEHAN, Mr. DELAHUNT, Mr. WEXLER, 

Mr. WEINER, Mr. SCHIFF, Ms. LINDA T. SA ́NCHEZ of California, Mr. 

VAN HOLLEN, Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, Mr. KENNEDY of Rhode Island, Mr. DOGGETT, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. FILNER, Mr. MARKEY, Ms. 

SCHAKOWSKY, Ms. LEE, Mrs. TAUSCHER, Ms. MCCOLLUM of Minnesota, 

Mr. UDALL of New Mexico, and Mr. HOLT) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Directing the Attorney General to submit to the House of 

Representatives all documents in the possession of the 

Attorney General relating to warrantless electronic surveillance of telephone conversations and electronic communications of persons in the United States conducted 

by the National Security Agency. 

1 Resolved, That the Attorney General is directed to 

2 submit to the House of Representatives not later than 14 
2 

•HRES 643 IH 

1 days after the date of the adoption of this resolution all 

2 documents in the possession of the Attorney General relat3 ing to warrantless electronic surveillance of telephone con4 versations and electronic communications of persons in the 

5 United States conducted by the National Security Agency 

6 (other than such warrantless electronic surveillance au7 thorized to be conducted under section 102(a) of the For8 eign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978), subject to nec9 essary redactions or requirements for handling classified 

10 documents, including any and all opinions regarding 

11 warrantless electronic surveillance of telephone conversa12 tions and electronic communications of persons in the 

13 United States. 

Æ
#### Judith A. Norrish, Respondent, v David V. Pacini, Appellant.

[814 NYS2d 385]

Carpinello, J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Ceresia, Jr., J.), entered February 16, 2005 in Rensselaer County, which, inter alia, denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint.

This negligence action was commenced against defendant to recover alleged damages for personal injuries arising out of an automobile accident. After service of a summons with notice, defendant served a notice of appearance and demand for complaint. Plaintiff neglected to timely serve the complaint prompting a defense motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3012 (b). Plaintiff cross-moved for an extension of time to serve her complaint and included therewith a proposed verified complaint and affidavit of merit. Defendant now appeals from an order of Supreme Court denying his motion and granting plaintiffs cross motion.

We affirm as we are unable to conclude that Supreme Court abused its considerable discretion in denying defendant’s motion to dismiss this action based upon plaintiffs failure to serve a complaint *(see Porter v Beaulieu,*282 AD2d 980 [2001]; *Skrabalak v Finn,*258 AD2d 719, 720 [1999]). It is well settled that in order to avoid dismissal under CPLR 3012 (b), a plaintiff must “ ‘demonstrate both a meritorious cause of action and a reasonable excuse for the delay’ ” *(Greater Amsterdam School Dist. v International Fid. Ins. Co.,,*285 AD2d 944, 944 [2001], quoting *Rios v Skaters World Roller Rink,*246 AD2d 882, 882 [1998]; *see Kel Mgt. Corp. v Rogers & Wells,*64 NY2d 904, 905 [1985]; *Arnodeo v Gellert & Quartararo, P.C.,*26 AD3d 705 [2006]). In our view, plaintiff established both.

First, plaintiff’s affidavit, wherein she details the circumstances surrounding the parties’ automobile accident and her resulting injuries, provides sufficient first-hand evidence of a meritorious claim *(see Porter v Beaulieu, supra; cf. Amodeo v*
      *1064
      *Gellert & Quartararo, P.C., supra).*Moreover, she offered a reasonable excuse for the relatively short delay, namely, law office failure *(see Bellcourt v Bellcourt,*169 AD2d 855, 855-856 [1991]; *see also*CPLR 2005; *see generally Braswell v Schaffler,*12 AD3d 474 [2004]; *Gagen v Kipany Prods.,*6 AD3d 963 [2004]). Thus, we affirm Supreme Court’s order.

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Spain and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Editorial Note on Part 9
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 9 appear at 82 FR 52825, Nov. 15, 2017.

§ 9.30 Contact for dispute resolution services. ( a ) NRC's FOIA Public Liaison: ( 1 ) By mail—11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852;
( 2 ) By facsimile—301-415-5130; and
( 3 ) By email—*FOIA.Resource@nrc.gov .*
( b ) Office of Government Information Services within National Archives and Records Administration: ( 1 ) By mail—8601 Adelphi Road-OGIS, College Park, MD 20740;
( 2 ) By facsimile—202-741-5769; and
( 3 ) By email—*ogis@nara.gov .*
[81 FR 96346, Dec. 30, 2016]
§ 1002.13 Annual reports. ( a ) Every manufacturer of products requiring an annual report as specified in table 1 of § 1002.1 shall submit an annual report summarizing the contents of the records required to be maintained by § 1002.30(a) and providing the volume of products produced, sold, or installed.
( b ) Reports are due annually by September 1. Such reports shall cover the 12-month period ending on June 30 preceding the due date of the report.
[60 FR 48386, Sept. 19, 1995, as amended at 88 FR 3653, Jan. 20, 2023]
§ 129.40 Equipment and procedures. ( a ) *Suitability.* ( 1 ) All plant equipment and utensils shall be suitable for their intended use. This includes all collection and storage tanks, piping, fittings, connections, bottle washers, fillers, cappers, and other equipment which may be used to store, handle, process, package, or transport product water.
( 2 ) All product water contact surfaces shall be constructed of nontoxic and nonabsorbant material which can be adequately cleaned and sanitized and is in compliance with section 409 of the act.
( b ) *Design.* Storage tanks shall be of the type that can be closed to exclude all foreign matter and shall be adequately vented.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Keith R. Phillips, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. section
1350, that:

(1)  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
     September 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
     section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


November 9, 2004

                                            By: /s/ Keith R. Phillips
                                               ---------------------------------
                                                Chief Financial Officer
#### § 121.320 Requirements for official review.

All records required by this part must be made promptly available to a duly authorized representative of the Secretary of Health and Human Services for official review and copying upon oral or written request.