alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (i)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|   |
|   | (ii)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|   |   |           |         |                    |   |   |   |
|--------|--------|----------------|--------------|-------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|   |   | /s/RansomJones |    |
|   |   |           | Name:        | RansomJones             |   |   |
|   |   |           | Title:       | Chief Financial Officer |   |   |
|   |   |           | Date:        | July19, 2018            |   |   |
## The Alabama Court of Civil Appeals

NATHAN P. WILSON 300 DEXTER AVENUE LYNN DEVAUGHN

CLERK MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36104

- 3741 ASSISTANT CLERK

TELEPHONE 334

- 229

- 0733

July 19, 2024

CL

- 2023

- 0853

V.M. v. Houston County Department of Human Resources (Appeal from

Houston Juvenile Court: JU

- 23

- 569.01).

CL

- 2023

- 0854

V.M. v. Houston County Department of Human Resources (Appeal from

Houston Juvenile Court: JU

- 23

- 570.01).

ORDER

You are hereby notified that the following action was taken in the above cause by the Court of Civil Appeals:

Application for Rehearing Overruled. No opinion written on rehearing.

Moore, P.J., and Edwards, Hanson, Fridy, and Lewis, JJ., concur.

Nathan P. Wilson, Clerk
#### BRADLEY et al., Respondents, v. DEGNON CONTRACTING CO. et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

December 11, 1914.)

Action by Harry L. Bradley and others against the Degnon Contracting Company and others.

No opinion. Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs. See, also, 163 App. Div. 961, 148 N. Y. Supp. 1107.
**Exhibit      31.6 **

**CERTIFICATIONS**

| 1)   | I                have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 to quarterly report on Form 10-Q                of                Greene County Bancshares, Inc.  |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2)   | Based                on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement                of a                material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make                the                statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements                were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this                report. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                       |                                                                                                                  |                                      |
|--------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
| Date: September              12, 2005 |                                                                                                             | /s/ William              F. Richmond |
|                                       | William              F. Richmond                                                                                      |
|                                       | Senior                Vice President, Chief Financial Officer  andAssistant                Secretary   |

----
Editorial Note on Part 118
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 118 appear at 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 118.7 Sampling methodology for Salmonella Enteritidis (SE). ( a ) *Environmental sampling.* An environmental test must be done for each poultry house in accordance with § 118.5 (a) and (b). Within each poultry house, you must sample the environment using a sampling plan appropriate to the poultry house layout.
( b ) *Egg sampling.* When you conduct an egg test required under § 118.6, you must collect and test the following number of eggs from the positive poultry house: ( 1 ) To meet the egg testing requirements of § 118.6(c), you must collect and deliver for testing a minimum of 1,000 intact eggs representative of a day's production. The 1,000-egg sample must be tested according to § 118.8. You must collect and test four 1,000-egg samples at 2-week intervals for a total of 4,000 eggs.
( 2 ) To meet the monthly egg testing requirement of § 118.6(e), you must collect and deliver for testing a minimum of 1,000 intact eggs representative of a day's production per month for the life of the flock. Eggs must be tested according to § 118.8.
# EUR-Lex - 31994D0566 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31994D0566

**94/566/EC: Commission Decision of 27 July 1994 amending Decision 87/131/EEC authorizing a method for grading pig carcases in the Netherlands (Only the Dutch text is authentic) **

*
Official Journal L 215 , 20/08/1994 P. 0027 - 0027 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 27 July 1994 amending Decision 87/131/EEC authorizing a method for grading pig carcases in the Netherlands (Only the Dutch text is authentic) (94/566/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 3220/84 of 13 November 1984 determining the Community scale for grading pig carcases (1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 3513/93 (2), and in particular Article 5 (2) thereof,

Whereas the Commission, by Decision 87/131/EEC (3), as last amended by Decision 92/100/EEC (4), has authorized a method for grading pig carcases in the Netherlands;

Whereas the amendments concerning the standard presentation of pig carcases introduced by Regulation (EC) No 3513/93 to Regulation (EEC) No 3220/84 as from 1 July 1994 allow to delete as from the same date, the derogation from the standard presentation provided for in Article 1a of Decision 87/131/EEC;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Pigmeat,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Article 1a of Decision 87/131/EEC is hereby deleted.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

It shall apply with effect from 1 July 1994.

Done at Brussels, 27 July 1994.

For the Commission

René STEICHEN

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 301, 20. 11. 1984, p. 1.

(2) OJ No L 320, 22. 12. 1993, p. 5.

(3) OJ No L 51, 20. 2. 1987, p. 50.

(4) OJ No L 39, 15. 2. 1992, p. 44.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE BODY OF THE ACCOMPANYING FORM 10-K AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             141
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      484
<ALLOWANCES>                                       219
<INVENTORY>                                          7
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   509
<PP&E>                                             238
<DEPRECIATION>                                     198
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     599
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,965
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            77
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,458)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       599
<SALES>                                          1,949
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,949
<CGS>                                              997
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,666
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 105
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,819)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,819)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,819)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.25)
        

</TABLE>
| **Scientific Investigations Map2847** |
|---------------------------------------|

| Geologic Map of the Hasty Quadrangle, Boone and Newton Counties, Arkansas |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|

By Mark R. Hudson and Kyle E. Murray**Version 1.0***Published 2004*The text of this report is presented here in Portable Document Format.      The latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader® or similar software is      required to view it. If you wish to download the latest version of Acrobat      Reader® free of charge, click here. SIM 2847 PDF        file (3.24 MB)For printing and viewing
Text Only PDF file (43 KB)
(This version of the report is accessible as defined in Section 508.)Readme TXT file (2 KB) SIM 2847 MET file (24 KB)Metadata file
 
2847.zip (5 MB)ZIPPED archive of ArcInfo and ArcView files2847.tar.gz (5 MB)TARRED and GZIPPED archive of ArcInfo and ArcView filesAccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices
U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey      URL: https://pubsdata.usgs.gov/pubs/sim/2004/2847/Questions or Assistance: USGS Web ContactPage Last Modified: Thr Dec  1 17:04 EDT 2016
J~~tEO srqr~s 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

0 

w 

c Q WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

. 

4l'94 PROS~G~` 

SEP 1 0 2010 

OFFICE OF 

SOLID WASTE AND 

EMERGENCY RESPONSE 

The Honorable Jack Kingston 

U.S . House of Representatives 

Washington, D.C . 20515 

Dear Congressman Kingston : 

Thank you for your letter of August 9, 2010, to the U.S . Environmental Protection 

Agency's (EPA), regarding the proposed rule Identification of Non-Hazardous Secondary 

Materials that are Solid Waste, and specifically regarding the classification of sawdust as a solid 

waste under the alternative approach. I appreciate your interest in this rulemaking. 

Under the alternative approach discussed in the preamble to the proposed rule, clean saw 

dust, and all clean biomass, is not considered a solid waste when burned as a fuel, even if it is 

processed into pellets. In fact, the proposed rule classified clean biomass as a traditional fuel . 

We will ensure that your letter is entered into the rulemaking docket for consideration as the final 

rule is developed. 

Again, thank you for your letter . If you have further questions, please contact me or your 

staff may call Amy Hayden, in EPA's Office of Congressional and Intergovernmental Relations, 

at (202) 564-0555. 

Sincerely, 

& ~j 04 )~~ 

Mathy Stanislaus 

Assistant Administrator 

Internet Address (URL) * http ://www .epa .gov 

Recycled/Recyclable 0 Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICING COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2013-2 for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2013 (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the Servicer), does hereby certify and represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of March 13, 2013, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2013-2 and U.S. Bank National Association (the Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.By:

/s/ Jason KulasName:

Jason KulasTitle:

President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:

March 28, 2014By:

/s/ Jennifer M. PoppName:

Jennifer M. PoppTitle:

Chief Accounting OfficerDate:

March 28, 2014
#### § 1230.2 Scope of the act.

The provisions of the act apply to any container which has been shipped or delivered for shipment in interstate or foreign commerce, as defined in section 2(c) of the act (44 Stat. 1407; 15 U.S.C. 402) or which has been received from shipment in such commerce for sale or exchange, or which is sold or offered for sale or held for sale or exchange in any Territory or possession or in the District of Columbia.
Order entered April 12 , 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 15
- 00853
- CR
SELVIN SANTOS
- HERNANDEZ, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Tria l Court Cause No. F13
- 30682
- V



### O RDER The reporter’s record was due in this case on September 26, 2015. On November 24,
201 5 , we abated the appeal for findings regarding why the record has not been filed. On December 11, 2015, we ordered the reporter’s r ecord filed within thirty days. When the record was not filed by January 21, 2016, we ordered that the record be filed by February 5, 2016. On February 8, 2016, we granted court reporter Robin Washington an extension until March 24,
2016 to file the recor d due to complications related to her pregnancy. To date, Ms. Washington has neither filed the reporter’s record nor communicated with the Court regarding the status of
the record. Accordingly, we ORDER the trial court to make findings regarding the follo wing: Whether Ms. Washington has done any work on transcribing the reporter’s record in this appeal.

 If Ms. Washington has done work on transcribing the record, the trial court shall determine the date by which the record will be filed.

 If the trial cour t finds that Ms. Washington has not yet begun working on transcribing the record, the trial court shall next determine whether Ms. Washington is able to work on the record or whether the notes of the proceedings should be surrendered to the trial court for transcription by another court reporter.

 If the trial court determines that another court reporter should transcribe the notes, the trial court shall provide the name and contract information for that court reporter as well as make a finding of the date by which the record will be filed.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record containing its findings of fact and any
orders to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable B randon Birmingham, Presiding Judge, 292nd Judicial District Court; court reporter Robin Washington; and to counsel for all parties.
We ABATE the appeal to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received.
/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
§ 120.6 Sanitation standard operating procedures. ( a ) *Sanitation controls.* Each processor shall have and implement a sanitation standard operating procedure (SSOP) that addresses sanitation conditions and practices before, during, and after processing. The SSOP shall address: ( 1 ) Safety of the water that comes into contact with food or food contact surfaces or that is used in the manufacture of ice;
( 2 ) Condition and cleanliness of food contact surfaces, including utensils, gloves, and outer garments;
( 3 ) Prevention of cross contamination from insanitary objects to food, food packaging material, and other food contact surfaces, including utensils, gloves, and outer garments, and from raw product to processed product;
( 4 ) Maintenance of hand washing, hand sanitizing, and toilet facilities;
( 5 ) Protection of food, food packaging material, and food contact surfaces from adulteration with lubricants, fuel, pesticides, cleaning compounds, sanitizing agents, condensate, and other chemical, physical, and biological contaminants;
( 6 ) Proper labeling, storage, and use of toxic compounds;
( 7 ) Control of employee health conditions that could result in the microbiological contamination of food, food packaging materials, and food contact surfaces; and
( 8 ) Exclusion of pests from the food plant.
( b ) *Monitoring.* The processor shall monitor the conditions and practices during processing with sufficient frequency to ensure, at a minimum, conformance with those conditions and practices specified in part 110 of this chapter and in subpart B of part 117 of this chapter that are appropriate both to the plant and to the food being processed. Each processor shall correct, in a timely manner, those conditions and practices that are not met.
( c ) *Records.* Each processor shall maintain SSOP records that, at a minimum, document the monitoring and corrections prescribed by paragraph (b) of this section. These records are subject to the recordkeeping requirements of § 120.12.
( d ) *Relationship to Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) plan.* Sanitation standard operating procedure controls may be included in the HACCP plan required under § 120.8(b). However, to the extent that they are implemented in accordance with this section, they need not be included in the HACCP plan.
[66 FR 6197, Jan. 19, 2001, as amended at 80 FR 56167, Sept. 17, 2015]
38399.

#### SOUTHERN AERO, INC. v. JORDAN.

Decided September 7, 1960.

*325*Hamilton Lokey, Lokey & Bowden, Glenn Frick,*for plaintiff in error.

*Poole, Pearce & Hall, William F. Lozier,*contra.

Gardner, Presiding Judge.

It is the contention of the defendant that the car was parked under a gratuitous bailment. The plaintiff contends that it was not a gratuitous bailment but was a mutual benefit bailment requiring ordinary care, a higher standard of care than is required of a gratuitous bailee. The defendant contends that the bailment was for the exclusive benefit of the bailor and that there was no benefit flowing to the defendant as a result of the parking of the plaintiff’s car. The defendant also contends that the defendant was under no obligation to anticipate that the employ'ee McClung would drive away and wreck the car and that it would be too heavy a responsibility to hold the defendant liable for acts which would be unusual and unlikely to happen or only remotely and slightly probable. In support of this contention the defendant cites *Peggy Ann of Georgia, Inc. v. Scoggins,*86 Ga. App. 109, 116 (71 S. E. 2d 89). This case is not on all fours with the case at bar and is not authority for the contention of the defendant that the ease should be reversed. For the same reason *Merchants Nat. Bank of Savannah v. Guilmartin,*88 Ga. 797 (15 S. E. 831, 17 L. R. A. 322) is not considered authority for reversal.

In modern business practices it has been found that free parking space is necessary in order to entice customers to shop in, for instance grocery stores and other places of business. It would seem that, if such facilities are not provided, customers would be lost to the place of business, and cars left in such enclosure would be of benefit to the proprietors of the businesses involved. In the instant case the evidence shows that a number of people who stored airplanes with the defendant also had cars which were left on the defendant’s lot and the keys were left in the defendant’s possession. There is nothing to indicate that this was not part of the structure for storing and use of the airplanes. The burden of proving the exercise of ordinary care was on the defendant. The evidence shows that the defendant had charge of the plaintiff’s airplane and car and that the *326defendant left the duty1 of caring for these high-priced properties to high school boys. The verdict is not without evidence to support it. The trial court has approved the verdict. No error of law is assigned. Hence it was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial. See *Duggan v. Ware,*30 Ga. App. 107 (117 S. E. 121). It has been many times held that a bailment exists where a mutual benefit is derived although no payment per se is made for the bailment. See *Dilberto v. Harris,*95 Ga. 571 (23 S. E. 112) and *Walpert v. Bohan,*126 Ga. 532 (55 S. E. 181, 6 L. R. A. (NS) 828, 115 Am. St. Rep. 114, 8 Ann. Cas. 89). See also *Goodyear Clearwater Mills v. Wheeler,*77 Ga. App. 570 (49 S. E. 2d 184).

The trial court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Townsend, Carlisle and Frankum, JJ., concur.*