U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1

79–118

" ! SENATE 106TH CONGRESS

2d Session

TREATY DOC.

2000

106–22

TREATY WITH RUSSIA ON MUTUAL LEGAL

ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS

MESSAGE

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

TRANSMITTING

TREATY BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE

RUSSIAN FEDERATION ON MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN

CRIMINAL MATTERS, SIGNED AT WASHINGTON ON JUNE 17,

1999, AND A RELATED EXCHANGE OF NOTES

FEBRUARY 10, 2000.—Treaty was read the first time, and together with

the accompanying papers, referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations and ordered to be printed for the use of the Senate

(III)

LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL

THE WHITE HOUSE, February 10, 2000.

To the Senate of the United States:

With a view to receiving the advice and consent of the Senate to

ratification, I transmit herewith the Treaty Between the United

States of America and the Russian Federation on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters, signed at Moscow on June 17, 1999.

I transmit also, for the information of the Senate, a related exchange of notes and the report of the Department of State with respect to the Treaty.

The Treaty is one of the series of modern mutual legal assistance

treaties being negotiated by the United States in order to counter

criminal activities more effectively. The Treaty should be an effective tool to assist in the prosecution of a wide variety of crimes, including terrorism, money laundering, organized crime and drugtrafficking offenses. The Treaty is self-executing.

The Treaty provides for a broad range of cooperation in criminal

matters. Mutual assistance available under the Treaty includes obtaining the testimony or statements of persons; providing documents, records and other items; serving documents; locating or

identifying persons and items; executing requests for searches and

seizures; transferring persons in custody for testimony or other

purposes; locating and immobilizing assets for purposes of forfeiture, restitution, or collection of fines; and any other form of

legal assistance not prohibited by the laws of the Requested Party.

I recommend that the Senate give early and favorable consideration to the Treaty and give its advice and consent to ratification.

WILLIAM J. CLINTON.

(V)

LETTER OF SUBMITTAL

DEPARTMENT OF STATE, Washington, December 30, 1999.

The PRESIDENT,

The White House.

THE PRESIDENT: I have the honor to submit to you the Treaty Between the United States of America and the Russian Federation on

Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters (the ‘‘Treaty’’), signed

at Moscow on June 17, 1999. I recommend that the Treaty be

transmitted to the Senate for its advice and consent to ratification.

Accompanying the Treaty is a related exchange of notes that I recommend be transmitted for the information of the Senate.

The Treaty covers mutual legal assistance in criminal matters.

In recent years, similar bilateral treaties have entered into force

with a number of countries. This Treaty contains many provisions

similar to those in the other treaties and all of the essential provisions sought by the United States. It will enhance our ability to investigate and prosecute a variety of crimes, including terrorism,

money laundering, organized crime and drug-trafficking offenses of

particular interest to the U.S. law enforcement community with respect to the Russian Federation.

The Treaty is designed to be self-executing and will not require

new legislation.

Article 1 states that the Parties shall provide to each other, in

accordance with the Treaty, comprehensive mutual legal assistance

in criminal matters. Article 1(2) defines legal assistance in criminal

matters for purposes of the Treaty as assistance provided by the

Parties in connection with: prevention, suppression, and investigation of crimes; criminal prosecutions; and other proceedings related

to such criminal matters. Article 1(3) provides for legal assistance

where the conduct that is the subject of the request constitutes a

crime under the laws of both Parties. The Requested Party may,

in its discretion, also provide legal assistance where the conduct

that is the subject of the request would not constitute a crime

under the laws of the Requested Party. Article 1(4) states explicitly

that the Treaty is intended to apply solely between the Parties; it

does not give rights to any other persons to obtain or exclude any

evidence, or to impede the execution of a request. Article 1(5) defines the term ‘‘person’’ to include both individuals and legal entities in Article 1(4), Article 2(4), Article 5(3) subparagraphs 1–5, Article 10(1), Article 14), and Article 15(2).

Article 2 sets forth a non-exclusive list of the major types of assistance to be provided under the Treaty, including obtaining testimony and statements; providing documents, records, and other
VI

items; serving documents; locating and identifying persons and

items; executing requests for searches and seizures; transferring

persons in custody for testimony or other purposes under the Treaty; locating and immobilizing assets for purposes of forfeiture, restitution, or collection of fines; and providing any other legal assistance not prohibited by the laws of the Requested Party.

Article 3 provides for the establishment of Central Authorities

and defines Central Authorities for purposes of the Treaty. Each

Party must implement the provisions of the Treaty, including the

making and receiving of requests, through its Central Authority.

For the United States, the Central Authority is the Attorney General or persons designated by the Attorney General. For the Russian Federation, the Central Authority is the Office of the Procurator General of the Russian Federation or persons designated by

the Procurator General. Article 3(3) provides that the Central Authorities will communicate directly with one another for the purposes of the Treaty, and may agree upon such practical measures

as may be necessary to facilitate the implementation of the Treaty.

Article 4 deals with the denial of legal assistance. Article 4(1)

sets forth the circumstance under which a Requested Party’s Central Authority may deny assistance under the Treaty. A request

may be denied if: (i) it relates to a crime under military law that

is not a crime under general criminal law, (ii) its execution would

prejudice the security or other essential interests of the Requested

Party, or (iii) it does not conform to the requirements of the Treaty.

In an exchange of diplomatic notes dated June 17, 1999, September

22, 1999, and October 20, 1999, the Parties restated the understanding of the negotiating delegations that the ‘‘security or other

essential interests’’ provision in Article 4(1) provides an adequate

basis upon which to deny assistance requests in cases the United

States would consider political offenses. Under Article 4(2), the Requested Party may not decline execution of a request on the

grounds of bank secrecy.

Before denying assistance, the Central Authority of the Requested Party is required under Article 4(3) to consult with its

counterpart in the Requesting Party to consider whether legal assistance can be given subject to such conditions as the Central Authority of the Requested Party deems necessary. If the Requesting

Party accepts assistance subject to such conditions, it is required

to comply with the conditions. If the Central Authority of the Requested Party denies assistance, it is required under Article 4(4) to

inform the Central Authority of the Requesting Party of the reasons for the denial.

Article 5 prescribes the form and content of written requests

under the Treaty, specifying in detail the information required in

each request. The article permits requests to be made in other

forms in urgent situations but requires written confirmation within

ten days unless the Central Authority of the Requested Party

agrees otherwise.

Article 6 provides that, except as otherwise agreed by the Central Authority of the Parties, requests for legal assistance and documents attached to them must be accompanied by a translation

into the language of the Requested Party.
VII

Article 7 addresses the execution of requests. Article 7(1) requires the Central Authority of the Requested Party to execute a

request promptly or to transmit it to the authority having jurisdiction to do so. It obligates the competent authorities of the Requested Party to do everything in their power to execute a request

in a timely manner. Article 7(2) requests the Central Authority of

the Requested Party to represent the interests of the Requesting

Party in executing the requests.

Under Article 7(3), requests are to be executed in accordance

with the laws of the Requested Party except if the Treaty provides

otherwise. It provides that the competent authorities of the Requesting Party will have the authority to issue subpoenas, search

warrants, or other orders necessary for the execution of requests.

Except if prohibited by its laws, the Requested Party must follow

procedures specified in the request. Under Article 7(4), if the Central Authority of the Requested Party considers that execution of

a request will interfere with a criminal investigation, criminal prosecution, or proceeding related to a criminal matter ongoing in that

State, it may postpone execution or impose conditions on execution

after consultation with the Central Authority of the Requesting

Party. If the Requesting Party accepts legal assistance subject to

such conditions, it must comply with them.

Article 7(5) further requires the Requested Party, if so requested,

to use its best efforts to keep confidential a request and its contents, and to inform the Requesting Party’s Central Authority if

the request cannot be executed without breaching such confidentiality. This provides the Requesting Party an opportunity to decide

whether to pursue the request or to withdraw it in order to maintain confidentiality.

Article 7(6) requires the Requested Party’s Central Authority to

respond to inquiries by the Requesting Party’s Central Authority

regarding the status of the execution of a request. Article 7(7)

states that, upon request of the Central Authority of the Requesting Party, the Central Authority of the Requested Party must furnish information in advance about the date and place of the execution of a request. During the execution of a request, the Requested

Party must permit the presence of such persons as are specified

therein.

Article 7(8) requires the Central Authority of the Requested

Party to inform promptly the Central Authority of the Requesting

Party of the outcome of the execution of the request. If the request

is not executed, or if execution is delayed or postponed, the Central

Authority of the Requested Party must inform the Central Authority of the Requesting Party of the reasons for non-execution, delay,

or postponement.

Article 8 apportions between the two Parties costs incurred in

executing a request. It provides that the Requested Party pay all

costs, except for the following items to be paid by the Requesting

Party: fees of experts, costs of translation, interpretation, and transcription, and the allowances expense related to travel of persons

pursuant to Articles 11 and 12. If it becomes apparent that the execution of the request requires expenses of an extraordinary nature,

the Central Authorities of the Parties must consult to determine
VIII

the terms and conditions under which legal assistance can be provided.

Article 9 requires the Requesting Party to comply with any request by the Central Authority of the Requested Party not to use

the results of the execution of a request obtained under the Treaty

for purposes other than those described in the request without its

prior consent. Nothing in the Article prevents the use or disclosure

of the results of an executed request to the extent that there is an

obligation to do so under the Constitution of the Requesting Party

in a chemical prosecution. The Central Authority of the Requesting

Party is obliged to notify the Central Authority of the Requested

Party in advance of any such possible or proposed use or disclosure.

Once the results of an executed request have been used for the purpose for which they were provided, and in the course of such use

have been made public in the Requesting Party in accordance with

the Treaty, no further limitations on use apply.

Article 10 addresses the procedures for obtaining testimony and

evidence in the Requested Party. Article 10(1) provides that a person requested to testify and produce documents, records, or items

in the Requested Party be summoned, if necessary by subpoena or

order, to appear and testify and produce such documents, records,

or items, in accordance with the requirements of the law of the Requested Party. Article 10(2) further states that, in accordance with

procedures used in the Requested Party, persons present at the

execution of a request must be permitted to pose questions directly

or to formulate questions to be posed to the person being questioned, and to make a verbatim transcript of the proceeding using,

if necessary, technical means. In the event that a person whose testimony or evidence is being taken asserts a claim of immunity, incapacity or privilege under the laws of the Requesting Party, Article 10(3) provides that the evidence will still be taken and the

claim made known to the Requesting Party for resolution by its authorities.

Article 11 addresses the procedures for obtaining testimony in

the Requesting Party. Article 11(1) provides a mechanism for the

Requesting Party to invite the voluntary appearance in its territory

of a person located in the Requested Party. As part of its invitation,

the Requesting Party must indicate the extent to which the expenses and allowances will be paid. The Central Authority of the

Requested Party is required to inform promptly the Central Authority of the Requesting Party of the response of the person. A

person who agrees to appear may ask that the Requesting Party

advance money to cover these expenses. This advance may be provided through the Embassy or a consulate of the Requesting Party.

Article 11(2) provides that a person appearing in the Requesting

Party pursuant to this Article will not be subject to service of process, or be detained or subjected to any restriction of personal liberty by reason of any acts or convictions that preceded the person’s

departure from the Requested Party. If this guarantee cannot be

provided for any reason, the Central Authority of the Requesting

Party is obligated to indicate this in the request to inform the invited person and to allow that person to decide whether to appear

taking these circumstances into account.
IX

Under Article 11(3), any safe conduct provided for by this Article

ceases seven days after the Central Authority of the Requesting

Party has notified the Central Authority of the Requested Party

that the person’s presence is no longer required, or if the person

has left the Requesting Party and has voluntarily returned to it.

The Central Authority of the Requesting Party may, in its discretion, extend this safe conduct period up to fifteen days if it determines that there is good cause to do so.

Article 12 provides that a person who is in the custody of either

Party and whose presence in the other Party is sought for purposes

of legal assistance under the Treaty will be transferred to that

Party for that purpose if the person consents and the Central Authorities of both Parties agree. Under this article, for example, a

witness incarcerated in the Requested Party could be transferred

to the Requesting Party to have his deposition taken in the presence of the defendant or a defendant in the Requesting Party could

be transferred to attend a witness deposition in the Requested

Party.

Article 12(2) further establishes both the express authority and

the obligation of the receiving Party to maintain the person transferred in custody unless otherwise authorized by the sending Party.

The return of the person transferred is to occur as soon as circumstances permit or as otherwise agreed by both Central Authorities, and the sending Party is not required to initiate extradition

proceedings for return of the person transferred. The person transferred receives credit for service of the sentence imposed in the

sending Party for time served in the custody of the receiving Party.

Where the sentence imposed expires, or where the sending Party

advises the receiving Party that the transferred person is no longer

required to be held in custody, the person is to be treated as a person invited pursuant to Article 11 or returned to the sending Party.

Article 13 requires that, upon request, the Requested Party Provide the Requesting Party with copies of publicly available records,

including documents or information of any nature and in any form

that are in the possession of an executive, legislative, or judicial

authority in the Requested Party. The Requested Party may further provide copies of records, including documents or information

of any nature and in any form that are in the possession of an executive, legislative, or judicial authority in that Party, but that are

not publicly available, but only to the same extent and under the

same conditions as these records would be available to the competent authorities of that Party. The Requested Party has the discretion to deny the latter type of request entirely or in part.

Article 14 requires the Requested Party to use its best efforts to

ascertain the location or identity of persons or information about

items in the Requested Party specified in a request.

Article 15 obligates the Requested Party to use its best efforts to

effect service of documents pursuant to a request. A request for the

service of a document requiring a person to appear in the Requesting Party must be transmitted a reasonable time before the scheduled appearance. Proof of service is to be provided in the manner

specified in the request.

Article 16 provides the conditions through which items can be located, seized and transferred. Article 16(1) obligates the Requested
X

Party to execute requests for search, seizure, and transfer of any

item to the Requesting Party if the request includes the information justifying such action under the laws of the Requested Party.

Article 16(2) provides that, if requested, every official of the Requested Party who has custody of a seized item certify the identity

of the item, the continuity of its custody, and the integrity of its

condition. Article 16(3) further provides that the Requested Party

may require that the Requesting Party agree to the terms and conditions deemed necessary to protect third-party interests in items

to be transferred.

Article 17 addresses the transfer of documents, records, and

other items. When a request for legal assistance concerns the

transfer of documents or records, Article 17(1) requires the Requested Party to transfer true copies of them, unless the Requesting Party expressly requests the originals, in which case the Requested Party must make every effort to comply with the request.

Article 17(2) further provides that, insofar as not prohibited by its

laws, the Requested Party is obligated to transfer documents,

records, or other items in such a manner or accompanied by such

certification as may be requested by the Requesting Party in order

to make them admissible according to the law of the Requesting

Party. For this purpose, the Central Authorities of the Parties will

exchange information pursuant to Article 3(3) with respect to the

requirements for admissibility in their respective legal systems.

Documents, records, and other items transferred as requested

under this paragraph require no further certification to make them

admissible. Article 17(3) states that the Central Authority of the

Requested Party may require the Central Authority of the Requesting Party to return, as soon as possible, any documents, records,

or other items furnished to it in execution of a request under the

Treaty.

Article 18 obligates the Parties, in accordance with their laws, to

assist each other in locating, immobilizing, and seizing proceeds,

including earnings from, or that are the result of, criminal activities, as well as instrumentalities of crime, for purposes of forfeiture, restitution to victims of crime, and collection of fines imposed pursuant to judicial decisions in criminal matters. Article

18(2) provides that if the Central Authority of one Party becomes

aware that proceeds and instrumentalities of crime that may be

subject to forfeiture are located in the territory of the other Party,

it may so inform the Central Authority of the other Party so that

the other Party may take appropriate measures under Article

18(3). The Central Authority receiving the information is obligated

to notify the Central Authority providing the information of the action taken.

Under Article 18(3), the Party that has immobilized, seized, or

forfeited the proceeds and instrumentalities of crime is required to

dispose of them in accordance with its laws. That Party shall transfer all or part of such forfeited assets, or the proceeds of their sale,

to the other Party, including for the purpose of forefeiture and restitution, insofar as permitted by its laws and to the extent it deems

it appropriate and within the time frame and under the conditions

it deems acceptable.
XI

Article 19 provides that the Central Authorities will consult, at

times mutually agreed, to promote the most effective use of the

Treaty.

Article 20 states that the Treaty applies to any requests presented after its entry into force even if the relevant acts or omissions occurred before that date.

Article 21 provides that the provisions of the Treaty will not prevent either of the Parties from cooperating and granting legal assistance in accordance with the provisions of other applicable international treaties and agreements, national laws, and practices.

Article 22 provides that the Treaty is subject to ratification and

will enter into force upon the exchange of instruments of ratification, which is to take place as soon as possible. Article 22(2) provides further that, upon entry into force of the Treaty, the Agreement between the Government of the United States of America and

the Government of the Russian Federation on Cooperation in

Criminal Matters, signed on June 30, 1995, will no longer be in

force. Article 22(3) states that either Party may terminate the

Treaty by written notice to the other Party through the diplomatic

channel, and that such termination will take effect six months following the date of receipt of notification.

A Technical Analysis explaining in detail the provisions of the

Treaty is being prepared by the United States negotiating delegation, consisting of representatives from the Departments of Justice

and State, and will be transmitted separately to the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations.

The Department of Justice joins the Department of State in favoring approval of this Treaty by the Senate as soon as possible.

Respectfully submitted.

STROBE TALBOT.

(1)
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16