alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 973 

Expressing support for the designation of July 15, 2018, as ‘‘National 

Leiomyosarcoma Awareness Day’’ and the designation of July 2018, 

as ‘‘National Sarcoma Awareness Month’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 28, 2018 

Mr. LEVIN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of July 15, 2018, 

as ‘‘National Leiomyosarcoma Awareness Day’’ and the 

designation of July 2018, as ‘‘National Sarcoma Awareness Month’’. 

Whereas a sarcoma is a rare type of cancer, accounting for 

approximately 1 percent of all newly diagnosed cancers, 

that arises in the connective tissue of the body; 

Whereas the National Institutes of Health designates sarcoma as a rare form of cancer, with sarcoma containing 

approximately 70 different subtypes; 

Whereas sarcomas are largely resistant to current chemotherapy agents, immunotherapy agents, and radiation 

therapies, posing a formidable challenge for researchers 

and specialists; 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 973 IH 

Whereas sarcoma subtypes have largely not received benefit 

from immunotherapies due to the complexity of the DNA, 

genomes, and mutations associated with the many variations in the sarcoma subtype landscape; 

Whereas leiomyosarcoma (referred to in this preamble as 

‘‘LMS’’) is a malignant, aggressive subtype of sarcoma 

derived from smooth muscle cells typically of uterine, gastrointestinal, or soft tissue origin, and can metastasize to 

the bone, spine, brain, and liver; 

Whereas the National Institutes of Health classifies LMS as 

a rare disease, accounting for approximately 10 to 20 

percent of soft tissue sarcomas, and LMS itself encompasses at least 4 different LMS subtypes; 

Whereas LMS primarily affects adults without regard to gender; 

Whereas research and clinical trials for LMS remain complicated, and the prospects for long-term survival remain 

poor; 

Whereas multidisciplinary care coordination teams, because 

of their expertise and experience, are critical to the 

health of sarcoma and LMS patients; 

Whereas sarcoma and LMS research will allow medical professionals to improve the quality of care for affected patients, lead to better clinical outcomes, and promote 

longer survival for patients; and 

Whereas increased education and awareness about sarcoma 

and LMS will contribute to the well-being of the communities of the United States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 973 IH 

1 (1) supports the designation of ‘‘National Sar2 coma Awareness Month’’; 

3 (2) supports the designation of ‘‘National 

4 Leiomyosarcoma Awareness Day’’; 

5 (3) recognizes the challenges faced by sarcoma 

6 and leiomyosarcoma patients; and 

7 (4) commends the dedication of organizations, 

8 volunteers, researchers, and caregivers across the 

9 country working to improve the quality of life of sar10 coma and leiomyosarcoma patients and their fami11 lies. 

Æ 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
#### § 3700.10 What does this part do?

This part adopts the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) guidance in subparts A through I of 2 CFR part 180, as supplemented by this part, as the Peace Corps policies and procedures for nonprocurement debarment and suspension. It thereby gives regulatory effect for the Peace Corps to the OMB guidance as supplemented by this part. This part satisfies the requirements in section 3 of Executive Order 12549, “Debarment and Suspension” (3 CFR 1986 Comp., p. 189), Executive Order 12689, “Debarment and Suspension” (3 CFR 1989 Comp., p. 235) and 31 U.S.C. 6101 note (Section 2455, Pub. L. 103-355, 108 Stat. 3327).
222 So.2d 881

#### STATE ex rel. Albert Louis Todd DEAN v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 49899.

June 5, 1969.

In re: Albert Louis Todd Dean applying for writ of mandamus.

Application denied. Relator is not entitled to the relief sought. See 15:574.9, subd. E.
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 763 

Supporting the goals and ideals of a National Children and Families Day, 

in order to encourage adults in the United States to support and listen 

to children and to help children throughout the Nation achieve their 

hopes and dreams, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 5, 2006 

Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of a National Children and 

Families Day, in order to encourage adults in the United 

States to support and listen to children and to help 

children throughout the Nation achieve their hopes and 

dreams, and for other purposes. 

Whereas research shows that spending time together as a 

family is critical to raising strong and resilient kids; 

Whereas strong healthy families improve the quality of life 

and the development of children; 

Whereas it is essential to celebrate and reflect upon the important role that all families play in the lives of children 

and their positive effect for the Nation’s future; and 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 763 IH 

Whereas the country’s greatest natural resource is its children: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

2 the goals and ideals of a National Children and Families 

3 Day to— 

4 (1) encourage adults to support, listen to, and 

5 encourage children throughout the Nation; 

6 (2) reflect upon the important role that all fam7 ilies play in the lives of children; and 

8 (3) recognize that strong, healthy families im9 prove the quality of life and the development of chil10 dren. 

Æ 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              OCT-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           2,697
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,838
<ALLOWANCES>                                       295
<INVENTORY>                                      1,063
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,303
<PP&E>                                           6,317
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,332
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  22,101
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,113
<BONDS>                                          5,690
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,292
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    22,101
<SALES>                                          3,542
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,220
<CGS>                                            3,205
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,765
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   257
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 175
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,182)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,182)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,182)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
From: "Achanta, Chandana L." <Chandana_L._Achanta@omb.eop.gov>

To: William Charmley/AA/USEPA/US@EPA, "'Neil.Eisner@dot.gov'" <Neil.Eisner@dot.gov>, "'Steve.Wood@dot.gov'" <Steve.Wood@dot.g

"'james.tamm@dot.gov'" <james.tamm@dot.gov>, "'rebecca.yoon@dot.gov'" <rebecca.yoon@dot.gov>, "'Joanne.Petrie@dot.gov'" <Joa

Date: 11/30/2010 03:02 PM

Subject: Summary of interagency working comments on draft NOI under EO 12866 review

Please find attached a summary of interagency working comments received on the draft supplemental 

NOI currently under EO 12866 review. They are for your consideration and subject to further policy 

review.

Thanks. 
Summary of Interagency Working Comments on Draft Supplemental Notice of Intent under EO 12866

Review

Below is a summary of interagency working comments received during interagency review of the draft

Supplemental Notice of Intent under EO 12866. They are for your consideration and subject to further

policy review.  

1) Interagency commenter recommends that the agencies add language similar to the following in

Section III:

“In his May 21, 2010 Memorandum, the President highlighted the opportunity for the U.S. to lead the

world in developing a new generation of clean cars and trucks, to spur economic growth and to create

high‐quality jobs.  In developing the proposal, the agencies will continue to gather input from

stakeholders, including the OEMs and labor unions, on the potential impacts of standards on jobs and

the automotive sector in order to maximize the opportunities for economic growth.”

2) Interagency commenter also requests the following revision to the sentence in the

supplemental notice:

“EPA and NHTSA intend to continue working with the California Air Resources Board in

developing the underlying technical assessments that will inform our future proposed standards

and we will continue to work with CARB on additional program related issues and seek their

input as we work toward our common goal of a National Program. We will continue to

coordinate on a number of on‐going studies, including technology cost, effectiveness, mass

feasibility, and mass‐related safety studies.”
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Legal Services Corporation

# DATE AND TIME: 

The Legal Services Corporation Board of Directors will meet telephonically on January 3, 2011 at 2:30 p.m., Eastern Time.

# LOCATION: 

The Legal Services Corporation, 3rd Floor Conference Center, 3333 K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20007.

# PUBLIC OBSERVATION: 

Unless otherwise noticed, all meetings of the LSC Board of Directors are open to public observation. Members of the public that are unable to attend but wish to listen to a public proceeding may do so by following the telephone call-in directions given below. You are asked to keep your telephone muted to eliminate background noises. From time to time the presiding Chair may solicit comments from the public.

*Call-In Directions for Open Sessions:*
    - Call toll-free number: 1-(866) 451-4981;
    - When prompted, enter the following numeric pass code: 5907707348;
    - When connected to the call, please “MUTE” your telephone immediately.

# STATUS OF MEETING: 

Open.

## Matters To Be Considered

### OPEN SESSION

1. Approval of agenda

2. Report of the Search Committee regarding selection of a candidate for the position of LSC President

3. Consider and act on the recommendation of the Search Committee

4. Consider and act on other business

5. Consider and act on adjournment of meeting

# CONTACT PERSON FOR INFORMATION: 

                        Katherine Ward, Executive Assistant to the Vice President & General Counsel, at (202) 295-1500. Questions may be sent by electronic mail to                         *FR_NOTICE_QUESTIONS@lsc.gov.*

# SPECIAL NEEDS: 

                        Upon request, meeting notices will be made available in alternate formats to accommodate visual and hearing impairments. Individuals who have a disability and need an accommodation to attend the meeting may notify Katherine Ward, at (202) 295-1500 or                         *FR_NOTICE_QUESTIONS@lsc.gov.*

      ( print page 82412)    
Dated: December 27, 2010.

Patricia D. Batie,

Corporate Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-32980 Filed 12-28-10; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7050-01-P
#### TOLMAN v. GILLESPIE et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

December 18, 1914.)

Action by Anna C. Tolman against Daniel Gillespie and others.

PER CURIAM.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, without passing upon the validity of the assessments, and on authority of Morgan v. Fullerton, 9 App. Div. 233-235, 41 N. Y. Supp. 465, as to the proper method of trial of that question.

CARR, J., not voting.
§ 2424.1140 What is the scope of a limited denial of participation? The scope of a limited denial of participation is as follows: ( a ) A limited denial of participation generally extends only to participation in the program under which the cause arose. A limited denial of participation may, at the discretion of the authorized official, extend to other programs, initiatives, or functions within the jurisdiction of an Assistant Secretary. The authorized official, however, may determine that where the sanction is based on an indictment or conviction, the sanction shall apply to all programs throughout HUD.
( b ) For purposes of this subpart, participation includes receipt of any benefit or financial assistance through grants or contractual arrangements; benefits or assistance in the form of loan guarantees or insurance; and awards of procurement contracts.
( c ) The sanction may be imposed for a period not to exceed 12 months, and shall be effective within the geographic jurisdiction of the office imposing it, unless the sanction is imposed by an Assistant Secretary or Deputy Assistant Secretary, in which case the sanction may be imposed on either a nationwide or a more restricted basis.
#### § 1800.6 [Reserved]
Exhibit 31.1

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John C. Kleinert, Chief Executive Officer of Velocity Asset Management, Inc.
(the "Company") do hereby certify that:

         1.       I have reviewed this amended quarterly report on Form 10-QSB
of the Company;

         2.       Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and

         3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Company as of, and for, the period presented in this report.

         4.       The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the Company and have:

                  (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedure, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed, to ensure that material
information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this report is being prepared;

                  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

                  (c) disclosed in this report any changes in the Company's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the company's
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting;
and

         5.       The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the Company's auditors and the audit
committee of the Company's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

                  (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which hare reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and

                  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's
internal control over financial reporting.

                                                 /s/ JOHN C. KLEINERT
                                                 -----------------------------
                                                 John C. Kleinert
                                                 Chief Executive Officer

November 14, 2005

                                       26
#### § 422.4 USDA Panel to determine appropriateness of research misconduct policy.

Before USDA will rely on a research institution to conduct an inquiry, investigation, and adjudication of an allegation in accordance with this part, the research institution where the research misconduct is alleged must provide the ARIO its policies and procedures related to research misconduct at the institution. The research institution has the option of providing either a written copy of such policies and procedures or a Web site address where such policies and procedures can be accessed. The ARIO to whom the policies and procedures were made available shall convene a panel comprised of the USDA RIO and ARIOs from the Forest Service, the Agricultural Research Service, and the National Institute of Food and Agriculture. The Panel will review the research institution's policies and procedures for compliance with the OSTP Policy and render a decision regarding the research institution's ability to adequately resolve research misconduct allegations. The ARIO will inform the research institution of the Panel's determination that its inquiry, investigation, and adjudication procedures are sufficient. If the Panel determines that the research institution does not have sufficient policies and procedures in place to conduct inquiry, investigation, and adjudication proceedings, or that the research institution is in any way unfit or unprepared to handle the inquiry, investigation, and adjudication in a prompt, unbiased, fair, and independent manner, the ARIO will inform the research institution in writing of the Panel's decision. An appropriate USDA agency, as determined by the Panel, will then conduct the inquiry, investigation, and adjudication of research misconduct in accordance with this part. If an allegation of research misconduct is made regarding extramural research conducted at a Federal research institution (whether USDA or not), it is presumed that the Federal research institution has research misconduct procedures consistent with the OSTP Policy. USDA reserves the right to convene the Panel to assess the sufficiency of a Federal agency's research misconduct procedures, should there be any question whether the agency's procedures will ensure a fair, unbiased, equitable, and independent inquiry, investigation, and adjudication process.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

RUSSELL W. BURTON,

Claimant-Appellant, 

v. 

ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS 

AFFAIRS, 

Respondent-Appellee. 

____________________ 

2012-7011 

______________________

 

 Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for 

Veterans Claims in Case No. 09-2873, Chief Judge Bruce 

E. Kasold. 

______________________ 

JUDGMENT 

______________________ 

SCOTT J. POPMA, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, 

Garrett & Dunner, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for 

claimant-appellant. With him on the brief were J.

MICHAEL JAKES and RONALD L. SMITH. 

ELIZABETH M. HOSFORD, Attorney, Commercial 

Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States 

Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for 

respondent-appellee. On the brief were STUART F.

DELERY, Acting Assistant Attorney General, JEANNE E.

DAVIDSON, Director, MARTIN F. HOCKEY, JR., Assistant 

Director, and TARA K. HOGAN, Attorney. Of counsel on the 

brief were DAVID J. BARRANS, Deputy Assistant General 

Counsel, and CHRISTA A. SHRIBER, Attorney, United 

States Department of Veterans Affairs, of Washington, 

DC. 

______________________ 
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, LOURIE, Circuit Judge 

and DANIEL, Chief Judge1). 

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

October 4, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly _ 

 Date Jan Horbaly 

 Clerk

 

1

 Honorable Wiley Daniel, Chief Judge, United States District Court for 

the District of Colorado, sitting by designation.
§ 1126.1 Purposes of this subchapter. This subchapter of the DoD Grant and Agreement Regulations: ( a ) Addresses general terms and conditions governing administrative requirements for use by DoD Components when awarding cost-type grants and cooperative agreements to institutions of higher education, nonprofit organizations, States, local governments, and Indian tribes. It does so by providing: ( 1 ) A standard organization of the administrative requirements into articles of general terms and conditions, each of which is in a specific subject area.
( 2 ) Standard wording for those articles; and
( 3 ) Associated prescriptions for DoD Component's use of the standard wording to construct their general terms and conditions, which allow for adding, omitting, or varying in other ways from the standard wording in certain situations.
( b ) Thereby implements OMB guidance in 2 CFR part 200 as it relates to general terms and conditions of grants and cooperative agreements to institutions of higher education, nonprofit organizations, States, local governments, and Indian tribes.