alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 113.83 Establishing scheduled processes.

Scheduled processes for low-acid foods shall be established by qualified persons having expert knowledge of thermal processing requirements for low-acid foods in hermetically sealed containers and having adequate facilities for making such determinations. The type, range, and combination of variations encountered in commercial production shall be adequately provided for in establishing the scheduled process. Variations include those that occur due to seasonal or growing fluctuations, variety differences, supplier processes, reprocessing, and mixing a batch of processed product with the same unprocessed product before it is processed. Critical factors, e.g., minimum headspace, consistency, maximum fill-in or drained weight, aw, *etc.,* that may affect the scheduled process, shall be specified in the scheduled process. Acceptable scientific methods of establishing heat sterilization processes shall include, when necessary, but shall not be limited to, the use of microbial thermal death time data, process calculations based on product heat penetration data, and inoculated packs. Calculation shall be performed according to procedures recognized by competent processing authorities. If incubation tests are necessary for process confirmation, they shall include containers from test trials and from actual commercial production runs during the period of instituting the process. The incubation tests for confirmation of the scheduled processes should include the containers from the test trials and a number of containers from each of four or more actual commercial production runs. The number of containers from actual commercial production runs should be determined on the basis of recognized scientific methods to be of a size sufficient to ensure the adequacy of the process. Complete records covering all aspects of the establishment of the process and associated incubation tests shall be prepared and shall be permanently retained by the person or organization making the determination.

[76 FR 11922, Mar. 3, 2011]
#### § 1002.51 Exemptions for manufacturers of products intended for the U.S. Government.

Upon application therefor by the manufacturer, the Director, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, may exempt from the provisions of this part a manufacturer of any electronic product intended for use by departments or agencies of the United States provided such department or agency has prescribed procurement specifications governing emissions of electronic product radiation and provided further that such product is of a type used solely or predominantly by departments or agencies of the United States.

[38 FR 28625, Oct. 15, 1973, as amended at 53 FR 11254, Apr. 6, 1988]
# EUR-Lex - 31993D0682 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31993D0682

**93/682/EC: Commission Decision of 17 December 1993 amending for the third time Decision 93/197/EEC on animal health conditions and veterinary certification for imports of registered equidae and equidae for breeding and production **

*
Official Journal L 317 , 18/12/1993 P. 0082 - 0082 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 54 P. 0047 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 54 P. 0047 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 17 December 1993 amending for the third time Decision 93/197/EEC on animal health conditions and veterinary certification for imports of registered equidae and equidae for breeding and production (93/682/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 90/426/EEC of 26 June 1990 on animal health conditions governing the movement and import from third countries of equidae (1), as last amended by Directive 92/36/EEC (2), and in particular Articles 15 (a) and 16 thereof,

Whereas Commission Decision 93/197/EEC (3), as last amended by Decision 93/510/EEC (4), lays down the animal health conditions and veterinary certification for imports or registered equidae and equidae for breeding and production;

Whereas certain problems have been encountered by Member States on the importation of equidae from eastern Europe, in particular with regard to the reliability of the laboratory tests to be conducted on the importation of such animals;

Whereas, therefore, provision should be made for such tests to be conducted in a laboratory approved for that purpose by the competent authority of the Member State of destination;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

In Annex II to Decision 93/197/EEC, footnote (5) in Health Certificate B is hereby replaced by the following text:

'(5) For the countries covered by this certificate, with the exception of Australia, Cyprus and New Zealand, the laboratory tests must be carried out by a laboratory approved by the Member State of destination. The test results, certified by the laboratory, have to be attached to the animal health certificate accompanying the animal.'

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 December 1993.

For the Commission

René STEICHEN

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 224, 18. 8. 1990, p. 42.

(2) OJ No L 157, 10. 6. 1992, p. 28.

(3) OJ No L 86, 6. 4. 1993, p. 16.

(4) OJ No L 238, 23. 9. 1993, p. 45.
§ 120.8 Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) plan. ( a ) *HACCP plan.* Each processor shall have and implement a written HACCP plan whenever a hazard analysis reveals one or more food hazards that are reasonably likely to occur during processing, as described in § 120.7. The HACCP plan shall be developed by an individual or individuals who have been trained in accordance with § 120.13 and shall be subject to the recordkeeping requirements of § 120.12. A HACCP plan shall be specific to: ( 1 ) Each location where juice is processed by that processor; and
( 2 ) Each type of juice processed by the processor. The plan may group types of juice products together, or group types of production methods together, if the food hazards, critical control points, critical limits, and procedures required to be identified and performed by paragraph (b) of this section are essentially identical, provided that any required features of the plan that are unique to a specific product or method are clearly delineated in the plan and are observed in practice.
( b ) *The contents of the HACCP plan.* The HACCP plan shall, at a minimum: ( 1 ) List all food hazards that are reasonably likely to occur as identified in accordance with § 120.7, and that thus must be controlled for each type of product;
( 2 ) List the critical control points for each of the identified food hazards that is reasonably likely to occur, including as appropriate: ( i ) Critical control points designed to control food hazards that are reasonably likely to occur and could be introduced inside the processing plant environment; and
( ii ) Critical control points designed to control food hazards introduced outside the processing plant environment, including food hazards that occur before, during, and after harvest;
( 3 ) List the critical limits that shall be met at each of the critical control points;
( 4 ) List the procedures, and the frequency with which they are to be performed, that will be used to monitor each of the critical control points to ensure compliance with the critical limits;
( 5 ) Include any corrective action plans that have been developed in accordance with § 120.10(a), and that are to be followed in response to deviations from critical limits at critical control points;
( 6 ) List the validation and verification procedures, and the frequency with which they are to be performed, that the processor will use in accordance with § 120.11; and
( 7 ) Provide for a recordkeeping system that documents the monitoring of the critical control points in accordance with § 120.12. The records shall contain the actual values and observations obtained during monitoring.
( c ) *Sanitation.* Sanitation controls may be included in the HACCP plan. However, to the extent that they are monitored in accordance with § 120.6, they are not required to be included in the HACCP plan.
#### § 1800.211 Information contained in a Federal award.

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 75948, Sept. 17, 2024.

NASA waives the requirement for the inclusion of indirect cost rates on any notice of Federal award for for-profit organizations. The terms and conditions for NASA may be found in Appendix D of the GCAM at: *https://prod.nais.nasa.gov/pub/pub_library/srba/index.html.*

[85 FR 71817, Nov. 12, 2020]
Editorial Note on Part 9
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 9 appear at 82 FR 52825, Nov. 15, 2017.

§ 9.60 Acknowledgement of requests. ( a ) Written requests by individuals to verify the existence of, obtain access to or correct or amend records about themselves maintained by NRC in a system of records subject to the provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974, shall be acknowledged in writing by the Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act Officer within ten working days after date of actual receipt. The acknowledgement shall advise the requestor if any additional information is needed to process the request. Wherever practicable, the acknowledgement shall notify the individual whether his or her request to obtain access to the record or to correct or amend the record has been granted or denied.
( b ) When an individual requests access to records or permission to correct or amend records in person, every effort will be made to make an immediate determination as to whether access or correction or amendment should be granted. If an immediate determination cannot be made, the request will be processed in the same manner as a written request. Records will be made available for immediate inspection whenever possible.
[40 FR 44484, Sept. 26, 1975, as amended at 53 FR 17689, May 18, 1988; 54 FR 53316, Dec. 28, 1989; 63 FR 15743, Apr. 1, 1998]
§ 176.70 Policy. Except as provided in § 176.80 or § 176.90— ( a ) None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available by the Recovery Act may be used for a project for the construction, alteration, maintenance, or repair of a public building or public work (see definitions at §§ 176.140 and 176.160) unless— ( 1 ) The public building or public work is located in the United States; and
( 2 ) All of the iron, steel, and manufactured goods used in the project are produced or manufactured in the United States. ( i ) Production in the United States of the iron or steel used in the project requires that all manufacturing processes must take place in the United States, except metallurgical processes involving refinement of steel additives. These requirements do not apply to iron or steel used as components or subcomponents of manufactured goods used in the project.
( ii ) There is no requirement with regard to the origin of components or subcomponents in manufactured goods used in the project, as long as the manufacturing occurs in the United States.
( b ) Paragraph (a) of this section shall not apply where the Recovery Act requires the application of alternative Buy American requirements for iron, steel, and manufactured goods.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 15 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 15

 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United 
 States Postal Service should take all appropriate measures to ensure 
          the continuation of its 6-day mail delivery service.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2017

  Mr. Graves of Missouri (for himself and Mr. Connolly) submitted the 
following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight 
                         and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United 
 States Postal Service should take all appropriate measures to ensure 
          the continuation of its 6-day mail delivery service.

Whereas the United States Postal Service has announced that it may need to 
        reduce the frequency of its mail delivery service from 6 days a week to 
        5 days a week;
Whereas 6-day mail delivery service is an essential service that the American 
        people have relied on since 1912, particularly working families that 
        depend on the Postal Service for the timely delivery of their paychecks; 
        and
Whereas reducing mail delivery service to 5 days a week would inevitably cause 
        not only delays in the delivery of mail, but higher postal costs, due to 
        the many hours of additional overtime that the Postal Service would 
        require in order to handle the resulting back-up of mail: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
the United States Postal Service should take all appropriate measures 
to ensure the continuation of its 6-day mail delivery service.
                                 <all>
```
§ 129.3 Definitions. For the purposes of this part, the following definitions apply: ( a ) *Approved source* when used in reference to a plant's product water or operations water means a source of water and the water therefrom, whether it be from a spring, artesian well, drilled well, municipal water supply, or any other source, that has been inspected and the water sampled, analyzed, and found to be of a safe and sanitary quality according to applicable laws and regulations of State and local government agencies having jurisdiction. The presence in the plant of current certificates or notifications of approval from the government agency or agencies having jurisdiction constitutes approval of the source and the water supply.
( b ) *Bottled drinking water* means all water which is sealed in bottles, packages, or other containers and offered for sale for human consumption, including bottled mineral water.
( c ) *Lot* means a collection of primary containers or unit packages of the same size, type, and style produced under conditions as nearly uniform as possible and designated by a common container code or marking.
( d ) *Multiservice containers* means containers intended for use more than one time.
( e ) *Nontoxic materials* means materials for product water contact surfaces utilized in the transporting, processing, storing, and packaging of bottled drinking water, which are free of substances which may render the water injurious to health or which may adversely affect the flavor, color, odor, or bacteriological quality of the water.
( f ) *Operations water* means water which is delivered under pressure to a plant for container washing, hand washing, plant and equipment cleanup and for other sanitary purposes.
( g ) *Primary container* means the immediate container in which the product water is packaged.
( h ) *Product water* means processed water used by a plant for bottled drinking water.
( i ) *Shall and should.* “Shall” refers to mandatory requirements and “should” refers to recommended or advisory procedures or equipment.
( j ) *Shipping case* means a container in which one or more primary containers of the product are held.
( k ) *Single-service container* means a container intended for one time usage only.
( l ) *Unit package* means a standard commercial package of bottled drinking water, which may consist of one or more containers.
[42 FR 14355, Mar. 6, 1977, as amended at 44 FR 12175, Mar. 6, 1979]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

AMANDA ST. HILAIRE AND ABC 27 

NEWS 

 v. 

OFFICE OF OPEN RECORDS 

(PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS) 

PETITION OF: PENNSYLVANIA 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 976 MAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 6th day of April, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED. 

Justice Wecht notes his dissent.
Shaw n Ghose/R6/USEPA/U S T o Arnol d Ondarza/R6/USEPA/US@EPA , Jame s Turner/R6/USEPA/US@EP A 07/13/200 7 01:2 8 P M ^ ^ bc c Subject Fw : Roger s Roa d NP L Ma p P.S
. Roger s Roa d wit h correc t lega l descnptio n Forwarde d byShaw n Ghose/R6/USEPA/U S o n G7/13/200 7 01:2 4 P M — - Jef f 1 h Danlelson/R6/USEPA/U S T o Shaw n Ghose/R6/USEPA/US@EP A 's^ ^ 07/13/200 7 01:1 0 P M c c Subject Roger s Roa d NP L Ma p

Th e pape rcopie s shoul d b e don e i n a fe wminutes , I'l l leav e the m o n Melody' s gues t chair
. Jef f^
,AR_Roge[sRdLandfillpdf Jeffer yDanielso n Lockhee d Marti n EP ARegio n 6 - GI S Suppor t Tea m 214.665.855 9 danielson.jeff@epa.go v

# NP L BoundaryRevie w Roger s Roa d Municipa l Landfil l

ARD98105580 9

Pleas e revie wth e NP L boundar yabov e an d not e modification s a s needed , Superfun d sourc e maps , sit e descriptions , an d aerial s have bee n use d t o determin e th e boundar yatx)ve , howeve ri t wil l b e considere d a draft boundar yunti l i t ha s bee n approve d b ya n RP M o rothe rsuperfun d official
. Acreag e liste d wa s calculate d fo rth e polygon(s ) show n above an d rounde d t o th e neares t whol e number
. I t ma ynot reflect actua l acreag e of th e sit e an d i s give n fo rinformationa l purpose s only
. 740 1,11 0 Z " . : , EP ARegio n 6 f ! Superfun d > ' 02/13/200 7 20070607ML1 3 

## N 

# A
§ 2000.330 What method must be used to pass requirements down to participants at lower tiers? A participant in a covered transaction must include a term or condition in any lower-tier covered transaction to require the participant of that transaction to— ( a ) Comply with subpart C of the OMB guidance in 2 CFR part 180; and
( b ) Include a similar term or condition in any covered transaction into which it enters at the next lower tier.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE INCOME
STATEMENT FOR THE TWELVE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998, AND THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           3,379
<SECURITIES>                                     7,630
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,390
<ALLOWANCES>                                       413
<INVENTORY>                                     14,943
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,769
<PP&E>                                          23,427
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,364
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  63,414
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,355
<BONDS>                                            363
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            74
<OTHER-SE>                                      53,468
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    63,414
<SALES>                                         26,950
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,697
<CGS>                                           10,700
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,832
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                26,452
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  35
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,827)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (496)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,331)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,331)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.44)
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Vander L. Beatty, Respondent, v. John L. Phillips, Jr., Appellant, et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding to invalidate petitions designating appellant as a candidate in the Democratic Party Primary Election to be held on June 23, 1970 for nomination for the public office of Member of the Assembly for the 54th Assembly District, Kings County, the appeal is from a judgment of .the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered June 11, 1970, which declared said petitions invalid, after a non jury trial. Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, petitions declared valid and directed to be reinstated. In our opinion, the evidence does not show that the petitions were permeated with fraud. Christ, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Kleinfeld and Brennan, JJ., concur.
<Page>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.1

                                INTERACTIVE DATA
                          FINANCIAL TIMES INFORMATION
                           498 7th AVENUE, 19th FLOOR
                            NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10018
                                 (212) 497-5030
                               FAX (212) 497-3100


                                                                   July 27, 2006



<Table>
<S>                                                 <C>
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated
Defined Asset Funds
P.O. Box 9051
Princeton, New Jersey 08543-9051

The Bank of New York
2 Hanson Place, 12th Floor
Brooklyn, NY 11217
</Table>


RE: DEFINED ASSET FUNDS--GOVERNMENT SECURITIES INCOME FUND,
    U.S. GOVERNMENT ZERO COUPON SERIES--3 AND 8
(A Unit Investment Trust) Units of Fractional Undivided Interest-Registered
Under the Securities Act of 1933, File Nos. 33-26716 and 333-36109

Gentlemen:

    We have examined the Registration Statement for the above captioned Fund.


    We hereby consent to the reference to Interactive Data Services, Inc. in the
Prospectus contained in the Post-Effective Amendment No. 17 to the Registration
Statement for the above captioned Fund and to the use of the evaluations of the
Obligations prepared by us which are referred to in such Prospectus and
Registration Statement.


    You are authorized to file copies of this letter with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.

                                          Very truly yours,
                                          STEVEN MIANO
                                          Director Fixed Income
                                          Data Operations