alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1309.25 Temporary exemption from registration for chemical registration applicants. ( a ) Each person required by section 302 of the Act (21 U.S.C. 822) to obtain a registration to distribute, import, or export a combination ephedrine product is temporarily exempted from the registration requirement, provided that the person submits a proper application for registration on or before July 12, 1997. The exemption will remain in effect for each person who has made such application until the Administration has approved or denied that application. This exemption applies only to registration; all other chemical control requirements set forth in this part 1309 and parts 1310, and 1313 of this chapter remain in full force and effect.
( b ) Each person required by section 302 of the Act (21 U.S.C. 822) to obtain a registration to distribute, import, or export a pseudoephedrine or phenylpropanolamine drug product is temporarily exempted from the registration requirement, provided that the person submits a proper application for registration on or before October 3, 1997. The exemption will remain in effect for each person who has made such application until the Administration has approved or denied that application. This exemption applies only to registration; all other chemical control requirements set forth in this part 1309 and parts 1310 and 1313 of this chapter remain in full force and effect.
( c ) Each person required by sections 302 or 1007 of the Act (21 U.S.C. 822 or 957) to obtain a registration to manufacture or import prescription drug products containing ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, or phenylpropanolamine is temporarily exempted from the registration requirement, provided that the person submits a proper application for registration on or before March 3, 2010. The exemption will remain in effect for each person who has made such application until the Administration has approved or denied the application. This exemption applies only to registration; all other chemical control requirements set forth in this part and parts 1310, 1313, and 1315 of this chapter remain in full force and effect.
[67 FR 14860, Mar. 28, 2002, as amended at 75 FR 4982, Feb. 1, 2010]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Balance
Sheet, Statement of Operations, Statements of Cash Flows and Notes thereto
incorporated in Part 1 Item 1 of this Form 10-QSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           3,222
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,222
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              499
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,500
<OTHER-SE>                                     (4,777)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,222
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,272
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,272)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,272)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,272)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00



</TABLE>
§ 1130.305 Use of real property. ( a ) *OMB guidance.* OMB guidance in 2 CFR 200.311(b) states that, except as otherwise provided by Federal statute or the Federal awarding agency, a recipient must use real property acquired or improved under a grant or cooperative agreement for the originally authorized purpose as long as needed for that purpose, during which time the recipient must not dispose of the property or encumber its title or other interests.
( b ) *DoD implementation.* Unless a statute or program regulation adopted in the Code of Federal Regulations after opportunity for public comment specifies otherwise, DoD awards must permit recipients to do the following: ( 1 ) While real property acquired or improved under an award still is needed for the authorized purpose, also use it for other projects or programs that either are supported by DoD Components or other Federal agencies or not federally supported, as long as that use does not interfere with the property's use for the authorized purpose.
( 2 ) After the real property no longer is needed for the authorized purpose, with the written approval of the award administration office, use the property on other federally supported projects or programs that have purposes consistent with those authorized for support by the DoD Component that made the award under which the property was acquired or improved.
( c ) *Award terms and conditions.* A DoD Component's general terms and conditions must either: ( 1 ) Include the wording appendix C to this part provides for Section A of PROP Article III; or
( 2 ) If a statute or program regulation in the Code of Federal Regulations specifies different requirements for recipients' use of real property, substitute alternative wording for Section A to specify those requirements.
Exhibit 32.1

 

Certification

 

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:

> 
(1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Inland's Monthly Income Fund, L.P. (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;

(2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(3) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inland's Monthly Income Fund, L.P.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

E.D. and P.D.,

Appellants,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-3672

[January 9, 2020]

Appeal from the State of Florida, Department of Children and Families;

L.T. Case No. 18-031CF.

E.H.D. and P.A.D., Tamarac, pro se.

Edmund M. Haskins, Assistant Regional Legal Counsel, Department of 

Children and Families, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

TAYLOR, CIKLIN and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 774 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 774

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                        April 26, 2006.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 5020) to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2007 for 
intelligence and intelligence-related activities of the United States 
Government, the Community Management Account, and the Central Intelligence 
Agency Retirement and Disability System, and for other purposes. The first 
reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against 
consideration of the bill are waived. General debate shall be confined to the 
bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the 
chairman and ranking minority member of the Permanent Select Committee on 
Intelligence. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment 
under the five-minute rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill 
for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the 
nature of a substitute recommended by the Permanent Select Committee on 
Intelligence now printed in the bill. The committee amendment in the nature of a 
substitute shall be considered as read. All points of order against the 
committee amendment in the nature of a substitute are waived. Notwithstanding 
clause 11 of rule XVIII, no amendment to the committee amendment in the nature 
of a substitute shall be in order except those printed in the report of the 
Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each such amendment may be 
offered only in the order printed in the report, may be offered only by a Member 
designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for 
the time specified in the report equally divided and controlled by the proponent 
and an opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to 
a demand for division of the question in the House or in the Committee of the 
Whole. All points of order against such amendments are waived. At the conclusion 
of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report 
the bill to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member 
may demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment adopted in the 
Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in the nature 
of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except 
one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Non-Speaker Sign-in

Revised Standards of Performance for New Residential Wood Heaters

Public Hearing

· February 26, 2014 

### Non-Speaker Sign-in Sheet



### $Lt( 

# Cvv\'h_:j 

# H-P**~,Co!<..ci.E'\** 

## \'l**~-rc<J"-,'.<:!:, ~j\P..U**  <:-**Pr~0o.c:-.,** 

## S:vt.c 

# ShO\Y\1'\oYl .:J

AVI:sVS1

# ~\)N~ 

# Joih\.QJL**~(~{\** 

## r'{LCCcrJL 

# OE"?**~**

# ~ 

# DfP**~~** -cv;**~**

# ~ '- -):

## ~ s 

# i_ 0 

# ,:1
'0 / / 0**~** c!:.**~** \ \___!

# ~ v '0**~0** lA 

# w "'S '-._) 

## >-

# ~ ""' - J 

# 1 s

# ~ ,--**~** 

## a: ls,\ <.1 

### <:¥-. 

## u 10'**~** 'Y v

## ~ 

# ""

# ~ V) 

# J f**~** & )iJ. 

### """"' 

## ::t 

# """ 2 .., .J' V'**c.~~** 

## J_**~** 

# rt '-t V" VI**~** 

# G "' <:::) 

## u 

# 2**~ ~** 



## .,

# ~ 42 ' lJ 

### 01 <1

# ~ '"""""' 

# I '::> ___., <±; 

# 2;

# ~**~** 

# w
c 

### 0 

## "i::: l 

## ., c J pl.' M 

# p**~** 

## . 

# - v;

### ~ 

# ---**~** 

### "'

## ~ ti_

# ~ ______., 

### "" 

# <t. c:::..> 

### "' 

# <t Q)

### ·~ 

# __ .:z

-;n. 

### "' ' c 0 zNon-Speaker Sign-in

Revised Standards of Performance for New Residential Wood Heaters

Public Hearing
February 26, 2014 Non-Speaker Sign-in Sheet

Mlct-lf\et.._ Tht-tM!NGiCl\1 

### INNovrrnvc**~/r=rr?-TH** P@'D-(cT;s



# --:] uh rJ 

## Ooh np/ 

# jy Ei'ls i/Wf>V ( c:; rbCh scI 

# (An (;I, I



### y i 

### (VIe 1 

### t (. Thi 

### lood. 

### e & LC 

### N 

## a ssoE P

It /l 

## Marc Cah.e.-, 

# j/Jwt-U-r. j;1}u_

# fbor~**~~**

# ~~ 

# !? /fAe 

# /}!te4__**~** 

# L- 

# fAkW £lv7 c,

## ~-zs~c 

## ., C. OJ) Vi**~ ~**  

### "' 

### "' =**~** 0 z )

)



## )

vv
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1182 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.1182

                     One Hundred Fifteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen

                                 An Act

 
 To extend the National Flood Insurance Program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``National Flood Insurance Program 
Extension Act of 2018''.
SEC. 2. PROGRAM EXTENSION.
    (a) Financing.--Section 1309(a) of the National Flood Insurance Act 
of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4016(a)) is amended by striking ``September 30, 
2017'' and inserting ``November 30, 2018''.
    (b) Program Expiration.--Section 1319 of the National Flood 
Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4026) is amended by striking 
``September 30, 2017'' and inserting ``November 30, 2018''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ESTUARDO ANTONIO PEREZALDANA,

Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

Respondent.

No. 14-71347

Agency No. A095-675-986

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 16, 2016**

Before: LEAVY, BERZON, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges. 

Estuardo Antonio Perez-Aldana, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions 

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his 

appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum 

and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

NOV 21 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 14-71347 

review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Zehatye v. Gonzales, 

453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 2006). We deny the petition for review.

The record does not compel the conclusion that Perez-Aldana established 

extraordinary circumstances to excuse his untimely-filed asylum application. See 8 

C.F.R. § 1208.4(a)(5). Thus, we deny the petition for review as to Perez-Aldana’s 

asylum claim.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determination that Perez-Aldana 

failed to establish past persecution or a likelihood of future persecution on account 

of an enumerated ground. See Parussimova v. Mukasey, 555 F.3d 734, 740 (9th 

Cir. 2009) (the REAL ID Act “requires that a protected ground represent ‘one 

central reason’ for an asylum applicant’s persecution”). Thus, Perez-Aldana’s

withholding of removal claim fails.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
#### § 113.89 Deviations in processing, venting, or control of critical factors.

Whenever any process is less than the scheduled process or when critical factors are out of control for any low-acid food or container system as disclosed from records by processor check or otherwise, the commercial processor of that low-acid food shall either fully reprocess that portion of the production involved, keeping full records of the reprocessing conditions or, alternatively, must set aside that portion of the product involved for further evaluation as to any potential public health significance. Such evaluation shall be made by a competent processing authority and shall be in accordance with procedures recognized by competent processing authorities as being adequate to detect any potential hazard to public health. Unless this evaluation demonstrates that the product had been given a thermal process that rendered it free of microorganisms of potential public health significance, the product set aside shall be either fully reprocessed to render it commercially sterile or destroyed. A record shall be made of the evaluation procedures used and the results. Either upon completion of full reprocessing and the attainment of commercial sterility or after the determination that no significant potential for public health hazard exists, that portion of the product involved may be shipped in normal distribution. Otherwise, the portion of the product involved shall be destroyed. All process deviations involving a failure to satisfy the minimum requirements of the scheduled process, including emergencies arising from a jam or breakdown of a continuous agitating retort necessitating cooling the retort for repairs, shall be recorded and made the subject of a separate file (or a log identifying the appropriate data) detailing those deviations and the actions taken.
§ 782.605 Award (USAID supplement to Government-wide definition at 2 CFR 182.605) *Award* means an award of financial assistance by the U.S. Agency for International Development or other Federal agency directly to a recipient. ( a ) The term award includes: ( 1 ) A Federal grant or cooperative agreement, in the form of money or property in lieu of money.
( 2 ) A block grant or a grant in an entitlement program, whether or not the grant is exempted from coverage under the Government-wide rule that implements OMB Circular A-102 (for availability, see 5 CFR 1310.3) and specifies uniform administrative requirements.
( b ) The term award does not include: ( 1 ) Technical assistance that provides services instead of money.
( 2 ) Loans.
( 3 ) Loan guarantees.
( 4 ) Interest subsidies.
( 5 ) Insurance.
( 6 ) Direct appropriations.
( 7 ) Veterans' benefits to individuals (i.e., any benefit to veterans, their families, or survivors by virtue of the service of a veteran in the Armed Forces of the United States).
( c ) Notwithstanding paragraph (a)(2) of this section, this paragraph is not applicable to AID.
#### 179 DUNCAN AVENUE CORPORATION, PROSECUTOR, v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF JERSEY CITY ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

Argued March 13, 1939

Decided March 29, 1939.

For the prosecutor, *Gross & Gross.*

For the defendants, *James A. Hamill*and *Charles A. Rooney.*

Brogan, Chief Justice.

The writ challenges the legality of an order or resolution of the Board of Adjustment of Jersey City, revoking a permit issued to the prosecutor by the superintendent of buildings to make certain alterations in a business property. The underlying question is whether the premises of the prosecutor, known as *Vtt-VtS*Duncan avenue, which have been for many years devoted to commercial uses, shall be continued as such. The property previously had been used as a motion picture theatre, then as a tavern and, lastly, as a storage and repair shop.

The superintendent of buildings of the municipality, on regular application, issued a permit to install new plumbing and to change the store front. Contracts were let to accomplish these changes and the work begun. Subsequently, upon the protests of neighboring business people, a hearing was had *293before the Board of Adjustment, as a result of which the board voided the permit issued to the prosecutor.

A reading of the minutes of the hearing before the Board of Adjustment, which is made part of the return to the writ, compels a conclusion that the objection to the alterations undertaken was grounded on the fact that the prosecutor intends to rent the premises to the King Cole Market. This is characterized in the minutes as a super market where meats, groceries and other necessary commodities will be sold at low prices at various stands in the premises.

Objections, the basis of which is that competition will result from the opening of a new market in the neighborhood, are without legal validity. That this is the basis of the protests is obvious. There is no power in the municipality to limit or regulate the use to which property may be put unless that limitation be within the provision of the statute *(Cf.*chapter 374, *Pamph. L.*1938; *R. S.*40:55-30 to 50) and the regulation imposed is “designed to promote public health, safety and general welfare.” The objections here urged are not grounded on interests of public health, safety or the general welfare. This legal principle is supported by a line of cases of which *Gabrielson*v. *Glen*Ridge, 13 *N. J. Mis. R.*142, is typical. See, also, *State*v. *Nutley,*99 *N. J. L.*389; *Durkin Lumber Co.*v. Fitzsimmons, 106 *Id.*183. It follows therefore that the action of the Board of Adjustment, in revoking the permit issued by the building inspector, was without legal justification and is therefore void. The order or resolution of the Board of Adjustment is accordingly vacated.

Judgment may be entered in favor of the prosecutor, with costs.
H. Res. 802

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

May 11, 2006.

Whereas Medicare now offers a prescription drug benefit for 

its beneficiaries, known as Medicare Part D; 

Whereas more than 35,900,000 Medicare eligible individuals 

are receiving prescription drug coverage, of which there 

are more than 27,000,000, including a substantial number of low-income and minority beneficiaries, receiving 

coverage through the new benefit; 

Whereas 8,100,000 beneficiaries have enrolled in stand alone 

Medicare prescription drug plans; 

Whereas estimates indicate that the average beneficiary will 

save more than $1,100 this year alone by enrolling in a 

Medicare prescription drug plan; 

Whereas the average monthly premium for enrolling in a 

Medicare prescription drug plan is now just $25 per 

month, which is far below the initial estimate of $37 per 

month; 

Whereas recent surveys of Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in 

Medicare prescription drug plans indicate that beneficiaries are satisfied with their coverage; 

Whereas advocacy groups including the AARP, National Alliance for Hispanic Health, the National Medical Association, and the National Council on Aging have all spon-
2

•HRES 802 EH 

sored enrollment events designed to encourage eligible 

beneficiaries to enroll in Medicare prescription drug 

plans; 

Whereas Area Agencies on Aging, State Health Insurance 

Programs (SHIPs), and other local and community organizations are available to provide seniors with assistance 

and answer their questions about how to select the Medicare prescription drug plan that best meets their needs; 

Whereas pharmacists are on the front line in delivering prescriptions to Medicare beneficiaries and continue to be instrumental in providing valuable information and assistance about the new benefit; 

Whereas in recent months Members of Congress have hosted 

hundreds of events and the Secretary of Health and 

Human Services, the Administrator of the Centers for 

Medicare & Medicaid Services, and other Administration 

officials have sponsored thousands of outreach and enrollment events, to educate seniors regarding the new prescription drug benefit; 

Whereas the deadline for enrollment in the new prescription 

drug plan without being subject to any late enrollment 

penalty is May 15, 2006; and 

Whereas editorial writers and opinion leaders across the nation have recognized the importance of an enrollment 

deadline because it encourages beneficiaries to make a 

decision about enrolling: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives encourages 

all Medicare beneficiaries who are not yet enrolled in Part D 

to review carefully all of the options that are available to 

them and to determine whether enrollment in a Medicare pre-
3

•HRES 802 EH 

scription drug plan best meets their current and future needs 

for prescription drug coverage.

Attest: 

Clerk.