alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 782.225 Whom in USAID does a recipient other than an individual notify about a criminal drug conviction? A recipient other than an individual that is required under 2 CFR 182.225(a) to notify Federal agencies about an employee's conviction for a criminal drug offense must notify— ( a ) Federal agencies if an employee who is engaged in the performance of an award informs you about a conviction, or you otherwise learn of the conviction. Your notification to the Federal agencies must— ( 1 ) Be in writing;
( 2 ) Include the employee's position title;
( 3 ) Include the identification number(s) of each affected award;
( 4 ) Be sent within ten calendar days after you learn of the conviction; and
( 5 ) Be sent to every Federal agency on whose award the convicted employee was working. It must be sent to every awarding official or his or her official designee, unless the Federal agency has specified a central point for the receipt of the notices.
( b ) Within 30 calendar days of learning about an employee's conviction, you must either— ( 1 ) Take appropriate personnel action against the employee, up to and including termination, consistent with the requirements of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794), as amended; or
( 2 ) Require the employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for these purposes by a Federal, State or local health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency.
§ 81.35 Notices to public of exclusive licenses. The Commission will have published in the Federal Register notices of the granting, revocation, or modification in duration and/or scope, of limited exclusive licenses under these regulations. Such notices shall identify the invention and shall include, directly, or by reference to previous notice(s) in the Federal Register pursuant to § 81.13 or § 81.30(a)(3) the following: ( a ) Identification of the licensee.
( b ) Duration and scope of the exclusive license.
( c ) That such a license is being granted or revoked, or the nature of the modification of the license.
( d ) The effective date of the grant, modification, or revocation.
H. Res. 650

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

January 31, 2006.

Resolved, That the Clerk of the House inform the Senate 

that a quorum of the House is present and that the House 

is ready to proceed with business. 

Attest:

Clerk.
#### § 200.107 OMB responsibilities.

OMB will review Federal agency regulations and implementation of this part, and will provide interpretations of policy requirements and assistance to ensure effective and efficient implementation. Any exceptions will be subject to approval by OMB. Exceptions will only be made in particular cases where adequate justification is presented.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 2 (Tuesday, January 4, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 376]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-33205]



[[Page 376]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-5415-N-30]


Notice of Availability: Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) for 
Fiscal Year 2010; Technical Assistance and Capacity Building Under the 
Transformation Initiative; Request for Qualifications

AGENCY: Office of the Chief of the Human Capital Officer, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: HUD announces the availability on its Web site of the 
applicant information, submission deadlines, funding criteria, and 
other requirements for HUD's Fiscal Year 2010 Notice of Funding 
Availability (NOFA) for Technical Assistance and Capacity Building 
under the Transformation Initiative. The OneCPD Integrated Practitioner 
Assistance System (OneCPD) represents a fundamental change in the way 
HUD's traditional ``program-specific'' technical assistance has been 
structured and delivered over the years to state and local government 
grantees, and nonprofits. Beyond improving the effectiveness of current 
technical assistance efforts by adopting a ``cross-program'' approach, 
OneCPD is intended as a collaborative effort among HUD, our state and 
local partners and successful applicants focused on building the kind 
of grantee management systems and functional capacity necessary to 
successfully carry out comprehensive and sustainable ``place-based'' 
development and revitalization strategies.
    The notice providing information regarding the application process, 
funding criteria and eligibility requirements can be found using the 
Department of Housing and Urban Development agency link on the 
Grants.gov/Find Web site at http://www.grants.gov/search/agency.do. A 
link to Grants.gov is also available on the HUD Web site at http://www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/fundsavail.cfm. The Catalogue of Federal 
Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number for this program is 14.259. 
Applications must be submitted electronically through Grants.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions regarding specific program 
requirements should be directed to the agency contact identified in the 
program NOFA. Program staff will not be available to provide guidance 
on how to prepare the application. Questions regarding the 2010 General 
Section should be directed to the Office of Grants Management and 
Oversight at (202) 708-0667 or the NOFA Information Center at 800-HUD-
8929 (toll free). Persons with hearing or speech impairments may access 
these numbers via TTY by calling the Federal Information Relay Service 
at 800-877-8339.

    Dated: December 29, 2010.
Barbara S. Dorf,
Director, Office of Departmental Grants Management and Oversight, 
Office of the Chief Human Capital Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-33205 Filed 1-3-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-40951 Conference Calendar

HARRY LEE PHILLIPS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JEFFERSON COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT; ADDITION TREATMENT AND RECOVERY CLINIC OF BEAUMONT, TEXAS; W. GEORGE, Doctor, Beaumont City Health Department, in his individual and official capacity; TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:96-CV-611

- - - - - - - - - - April 9, 1998 Before JOLLY, JONES, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Henry Lee Phillips appeals from the district court’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) dismissal of his complaint brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He argues that the defendants’ deliberate indifference caused him to lose sight in his right eye, but he fails to address the district court’s dismissal of his cause of action as barred by the applicable statute of limitations. Issues not raised or briefed are considered abandoned.No. 97-40951 -2- Evans v. City of Marlin, Tex. , 986 F.2d 104, 106 n.1 (5th Cir. 1993). Nevertheless, as there is only one issue on appeal and the appellees have briefed the question, we will address the issue. See Grant v. Cuellar , 59 F.3d 523, 525 (5th Cir. 1995). We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties, and find that the district court did not plainly err in finding that the complaint was barred by the Texas two-year statute of limitations. Phillips v. Jefferson County Probation Department, et al. , No. 1:96-CV-611 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 22, 1997); Douglass v. United Services Auto. Ass’n ., 79 F.3d 1415, 1417, 1429 (5th Cir. 1996)(en banc). An appeal from a complaint dismissed because it was filed long after the limitations period expired is without merit and therefore frivolous. We caution Phillips that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Phillips is further cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous. APPEAL DISMISSED, 5th Cir. R. 42.2. SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
IV 

House Calendar No. 120 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 558 

[Report No. 109–301] 

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 72) making 

further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2006, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 17 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 16), 2005 

Mr. PUTNAM, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 

72) making further continuing appropriations for the 

fiscal year 2006, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution 

2 it shall be in order without intervention of any point of 

3 order to consider in the House the joint resolution (H.J. 

4 Res. 72) making further continuing appropriations for the 

5 fiscal year 2006, and for other purposes. The joint resolu6 tion shall be considered as read. The previous question 

7 shall be considered as ordered on the joint resolution to 
2 

HRES 558 RH 

1 final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one 

2 hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair3 man and ranking minority member of the Committee on 

4 Appropriations; and (2) one motion to recommit. 

5 SEC. 2. House Resolution 542 is laid on the table. 

House Calendar No. 120 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 558 

[Report No. 109–301] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution 

N

purposes. priations for the fiscal year 2006, and for other (H.J. Res. 72) making further continuing approOVEMBER 17 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 16), 2005 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed
<PAGE>



EX-27
2
FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE

ARTICLE 5

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS IN FORM 10-Q FOR MEDIALINK WORLDWIDE INCORPORATED FOR THE
PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2001 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

NAME> MEDIALINK WORLDWIDE INCORPORATED
MULTIPLIER> 1

PERIOD-TYPE                                  6-MOS
FISCAL-YEAR-END                              DEC-31-2001
PERIOD-START                                 JAN-01-2001
PERIOD-END                                   JUNE-30-2001
CASH                                         2,492,552
SECURITIES                                   0
RECEIVABLES                                  13,015,146
ALLOWANCES                                   554,000
INVENTORY                                    0
CURRENT-ASSETS                               18,169,121
PP&E                                         11,059,363
DEPRECIATION                                 4,626,275
TOTAL-ASSETS                                 41,241,262
CURRENT-LIABILITIES                          9,501,879
BONDS                                        0
PREFERRED-MANDATORY                          0
PREFERRED                                    0
COMMON                                       58,207
OTHER-SE                                     31,558,655
TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY                   41,241,262
SALES                                        26,837,643
TOTAL-REVENUES                               26,837,643
CGS                                          9,479,298
TOTAL-COSTS                                  9,479,298
OTHER-EXPENSES                               18,924,546
LOSS-PROVISION                               0
INTEREST-EXPENSE                             85,598
INCOME-PRETAX                                (1,609,541)
INCOME-TAX                                   (675,000)
INCOME-CONTINUING                            (934,541)
DISCONTINUED                                 0
EXTRAORDINARY                                0
CHANGES                                      0
NET-INCOME                                   (934,541)
EPS-BASIC                                    (0.16)
EPS-DILUTED                                  (0.16)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Balance
Sheet at June 30, 1999 and the Statement of Operations for the six months then
ended, as included in this Form 10-QSB, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                               OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           217,472
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 217,472
<PP&E>                                                 0
<DEPRECIATION>                                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   217,472
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             10,000
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                           2,814
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,436,745
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     217,472
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       0
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  21,244
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (8,818)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        0
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (12,426)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (12,426)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0



</TABLE>
# L_2018010EN.01000101.xml

| 13.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 10/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 10/1

---

COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2018/53

of 12 January 2018

implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1509 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People's Republic of Korea

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1509 of 30 August 2017 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People's Republic of Korea and repealing Regulation (EC) No 329/2007 (1), and in particular Article 47(1) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 30 August 2017, the Council adopted Regulation (EU) 2017/1509. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 30 August 2017, the Council adopted Regulation (EU) 2017/1509.

| (2) | On 28 December 2017, the United Nations Security Council (‘UNSC’) Committee established pursuant to UNSC Resolution (‘UNSCR’) 1718 (2006) designated four vessels pursuant to paragraph 6 of UNSCR 2375 (2017). |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 28 December 2017, the United Nations Security Council (‘UNSC’) Committee established pursuant to UNSC Resolution (‘UNSCR’) 1718 (2006) designated four vessels pursuant to paragraph 6 of UNSCR 2375 (2017).

| (3) | Annex XIV to Regulation (EU) 2017/1509 should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex XIV to Regulation (EU) 2017/1509 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex XIV to Regulation (EU) 2017/1509 is amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 12 January 2018.

For the Council

The President

E. KRALEVA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 224, 31.8.2017, p. 1.

1

---

ANNEX

The following vessels are added to the list of vessels subject to restrictive measures set out in Annex XIV to Regulation (EU) 2017/1509:

| ‘5. | Name: BILLIONS NO. 18

  Additional information

  IMO: 9191773 |
| --- | --- |

‘5.

Name: BILLIONS NO. 18

Additional information

IMO: 9191773

| 6. | Name: UL JI BONG 6

  Additional information

  IMO: 9114555 |
| --- | --- |

6.

Name: UL JI BONG 6

Additional information

IMO: 9114555

| 7. | Name: RUNG RA 2

  Additional information

  IMO: 9020534 |
| --- | --- |

7.

Name: RUNG RA 2

Additional information

IMO: 9020534

| 8. | Name: RYE SONG GANG 1

  Additional information

  IMO: 7389704’. |
| --- | --- |

8.

Name: RYE SONG GANG 1

Additional information

IMO: 7389704’.

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                     C.P. CLARE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES


     SUBSIDIARY                                 PLACE OF INCORPORATION
     ----------                                 ----------------------

Clare Capital, Inc.                                  New York
Clare Capital, Inc.                                  Delaware
Clare Components, Inc.                               New York
Clare Components, Inc.                               Delaware
Clare Electronics, Inc.                              New York
Clare Electronics, Inc.                              Delaware
Clare Instruments, Inc.                              New York
Clare Instruments, Inc.                              Delaware
Clare Services, Inc.                                 New York
Clare Services, Inc.                                 Delaware
Clare Systems, Inc.                                  New York
Clare Systems, Inc.                                  Delaware
Clare Technologies, Inc.                             New York
Clare Technologies, Inc.                             Delaware
Clare Canada, Ltd.                                   Ontario, Canada
Clare France S. A. R. L.                             France
C. P. Clare Electronics GmbH                         Germany
C. P. Clare Foreign Sales Corporation                U.S. Virgin Islands
C. P. Clare International N.V.                       Belgium
C. P. Clare Engineering N.V.                         Belgium
C. P. Clare Mexicana S.A. de C.V.                    Mexico
Clare Technologies (Taiwan), Inc.                    Taiwan
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7170

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DAVID HUNG VO MANH DUONG, a/k/a “D”, a/k/a

Martin Nguyen,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief

District Judge. (CR-97-98-MU)

Submitted: February 22, 2001 Decided: February 28, 2001

Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Hung Vo Manh Duong, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Lee Whisler,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

David Hung Vo Manh Duong seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion for correction of sentence, pursuant to

Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(c). We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because Duong’s notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Criminal defendants are accorded ten days after entry of the

judgment or order being appealed. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1). The

district court can extend that time period for up to another thirty

days upon a finding of good cause and excusable neglect. Fed. R.

App. P. 4(b)(4). The appeal periods are mandatory and jurisdictional. Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257,

264 (1978); United States v. Raynor, 939 F.2d 191, 197 (4th Cir.

1991).

Here, the district court entered the order denying the Rule 35

motion on June 19, 2000. Duong’s notice of appeal was filed on

August 14 and dated August 8, 2000, forty-nine days after the

order. Therefore, because Duong failed to file a timely notice of

appeal, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
# EUR-Lex - 31975D0287 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31975D0287

**75/287/EEC: Commission Decision of 18 April 1975 exempting the Kingdom of Denmark, Ireland, the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from applying the Council Directive of 9 April 1968 on the marketing of material for the vegetative propagation of the vine (Only the English, Danish and Dutch texts are authentic) **

*
Official Journal L 122 , 14/05/1975 P. 0015 - 0015 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 18 April 1975 exempting the Kingdom of Denmark, Ireland, the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from applying the Council Directive of 9 April 1968 on the marketing of material for the vegetative propagation of the vine (Only the English, Danish and Dutch texts are authentic) (75/287/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community;

Having regard to the Directive of 9 April 1968 (1) on the marketing of material for the vegetative propagation of the vine, as last amended by the Council Directive of 9 December 1974 (2), and in particular Article 18a thereof;

Having regard to the request submitted by the Kingdom of Denmark, Ireland, the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland;

Whereas the growing of vines and the marketing of propagation material in Denmark, Ireland, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom is either non-existent or of minimal economic importance;

Whereas, therefore, it seems desirable, as long as this continues to be the case, to release the aforementioned Member States from the obligation to apply the provisions of the abovementioned Directives;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the Opinion of the Standing Committee on Seeds and Propagating Material for Agriculture, Horticulture and Forestry;

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Kingdom of Denmark, Ireland, the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland are hereby exempted from applying the Council Directive of 9 April 1968 on the marketing of material for the vegetative propagation of the vine, with the exception of the provisions of Articles 12 (1) and 12a.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Denmark, Ireland, the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

Done at Brussels, 18 April 1975.

For the Commission

P.J. LARDINOIS

Member of the Commission (1)OJ No L 93, 17.4.1968, p. 15. (2)OJ No L 352, 28.12.1974, p. 43.