alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 780.5 Applications—General form, content, and filing. ( a ) Each application shall be signed by the applicant and shall state the applicant's name and address. If the applicant is a corporation, the application shall be signed by an authorized officer of the corporation, and the application shall indicate the state of incorporation. Where the applicant elects to be represented by counsel, a signed notice to that effect shall be filed with the Board.
( b ) Each application must contain a concise statement of all of the essential facts upon which it is based. No particular form of statement is required. Each application shall be verified by the applicant or by the person having the best knowledge of such facts. In the case of facts stated on information and belief, the source of such information and grounds of belief shall be given.
( c ) Each application must identify any person whose interest the applicant believes may be affected by the proceeding before the Board.
( d ) Three copies of each application shall be filed with the Board. However, only one copy of the accompanying exhibits need be filed.
( e ) The Board will acknowledge the receipt of the application in writing and advise the applicant of the docket number assigned to the application.
PUBLIC LAW 108–261—JUNE 25, 2004 118 STAT. 695

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4299:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):

May 11, considered and passed House.

June 9, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 108–261

108th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 410 South

Jackson Road in Edinburg, Texas, as the ‘‘Dr. Miguel A. Neva ́ rez Post Office

Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

410 South Jackson Road in Edinburg, Texas, shall be known and

designated as the ‘‘Dr. Miguel A. Neva ́ rez Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Dr. Miguel

A. Neva ́ rez Post Office Building’’.

Approved June 25, 2004.

June 25, 2004

[H.R. 4299]
# L_2023227EN.01001901.xml

| 14.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 227/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 227/19

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 157/2020

of 23 October 2020

amending Annex IX (Financial services) to the EEA Agreement [2023/1732]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (“the EEA Agreement”), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/1935 of 13 May 2019 amending Directive (EU) 2016/97 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards adapting the base euro amounts for professional indemnity insurance and for financial capacity of insurance and reinsurance intermediaries (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/1935 of 13 May 2019 amending Directive (EU) 2016/97 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards adapting the base euro amounts for professional indemnity insurance and for financial capacity of insurance and reinsurance intermediaries (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex IX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex IX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 13e (Directive (EU) 2016/97 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex IX to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32019 R 1935: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/1935 of 13 May 2019 (OJ L 301, 22.11.2019, p. 3).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32019 R 1935: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/1935 of 13 May 2019 (OJ L 301, 22.11.2019, p. 3).’

Article 2

The text of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/1935 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 24 October 2020, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1), or on the day of the entry into force of Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 214/2018 of 26 October 2018 (2), whichever is the later.

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 23 October 2020.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Sabine MONAUNI

---

(1)  
  OJ L 301, 22.11.2019, p. 3.

1

(*1)  Constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

(2)  
  OJ L 105, 25.3.2021, p.9.

2

---
2007-2057.

#### Nash v. Thomas.

In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of Timothy M. Nash and motion to amend petition for writ of habeas corpus. Sua sponte, cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
H. Res. 980

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 6, 2006.

Whereas the people of Kentucky, including the citizens of the 

6th Congressional District, have experienced a terrible 

tragedy with the loss of 49 lives in the crash of Comair 

Flight 5191 at Blue Grass Airport in Lexington, Kentucky, on August 27, 2006; 

Whereas many of the victims of the crash were residents of 

Kentucky, particularly of the small, close-knit town of 

Lexington and other surrounding communities; and 

Whereas Federal, State, and local officials have cooperated 

not only at the crash site but throughout Kentucky and 

the Nation to respond to the emergency, investigate the 

accident, and provide assistance to families devastated by 

the loss of loved ones: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) expresses condolences to the families, friends, 

and loved ones of the victims of the crash of Comair 

Flight 5191; 

(2) honors the victims of the crash: Rebecca Adams, 

Christina Anderson, Lyle Anderson, Arnold Andrews, 

Anne Marie Bailey, Bobbie Benton, Jesse Clark Benton, 

Carole Bizzack, George Brunacini, Brian Byrd, Jeffrey 
2

•HRES 980 EH 

Clay, Homer Combs, Diane Combs, Fenton Dawson, 

Thomas Fahey, Mike Finley, Clarence Wayne ‘‘C.W.’’ 

Fortney II, Wade Bartley ‘‘Bart’’ Frederick, Hollie Gilbert, Erik Harris, Kelly Heyer, Jonathan Hooker, 

Scarlett Parsley Hooker, Priscilla Johnson, Tetsuya 

Kono, Nahoko Kono, Charles Lykins, Dan Mallory, 

Steve McElravy, Lynda McKee, Bobby Meaux, Leslie 

Morris II, Kaye Craig Morris, Cecile Moscoe, Judy Ann 

Rains, Michael Ryan, Mary Jane Silas, Pat Smith, Tim 

Snoddy, Marcie Thomason, Greg Threet, Randy Towles, 

Larry Turner, Victoria Washington, Jeff Williams, Paige 

Winters, Bryan Woodward, JoAnn Wright, and Betty 

Young; 

(3) expresses sympathies to the people of Lexington, the entire Commonwealth of Kentucky, and the 

Nation who grieve for the victims; 

(4) commends the heroic actions of the rescue workers at the crash site who retrieved copilot James M. 

Polehinke from the wreckage; and 
3

•HRES 980 EH 

(5) commends the Federal, State, and local officials 

and the volunteers who worked together to respond to 

the tragedy with courage, determination, and skill. 

Attest:

Clerk.
§ 950.28 Payment of covered costs. ( a ) *General.* The Department shall pay to a sponsor covered costs in accordance with this subpart and the terms of the Standby Support Contract. Payment shall be made in such installments and on such conditions as the Department determines appropriate. Any overpayments by the Department of the covered costs shall be offset from future payments to the sponsor or returned by the sponsor to the Department within forty-five (45) days. If there is a dispute, then the Department shall pay the undisputed costs and defer payment of the disputed portion upon resolution of the dispute in accordance with the procedures in subpart D of this part. If the covered costs include principal or interest owed on a loan made or guaranteed by a Federal agency, the Department shall instead pay that Federal agency the covered costs, rather than the sponsor.
( b ) *Timing of Payment.* The sponsor may receive payment of covered costs when: ( 1 ) The Department has approved payment of the covered cost as specified in this subpart; and
( 2 ) The sponsor has incurred and is obligated to pay the costs for which payment is requested.
( c ) *Payment process.* The covered costs shall be paid to the sponsor designated on the Certification of Covered Costs required by § 950.23, or to the sponsor's assignee as permitted by § 950.13(h). A sponsor that requests payment of the covered costs must receive payment through electronic funds transfer.
§ 1.326 Who is subject to this subpart? ( a ) Persons who manufacture, process, pack, transport, distribute, receive, hold, or import food in the United States are subject to the regulations in this subpart, unless you qualify for one of the exclusions in § 1.327. If you conduct more than one type of activity at a location, you are required to keep records with respect to those activities covered by this subpart, but are not required by this subpart to keep records with respect to activities that fall within one of the exclusions in § 1.327.
( b ) Persons subject to the regulations in this subpart must keep records whether or not the food is being offered for or enters interstate commerce.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Steven M. Goldschein, Chief Financial Officer of Systemax
Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Systemax Inc. (the
"registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within these entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being
prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's control over financial reporting.

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors:

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting known to me
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls over financial reporting.

Date: March 26, 2004

/s/ STEVEN M. GOLDSCHEIN
Steven M. Goldschein, Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 99.1

                          CERTIFICATIONS

I, John Little, President of Tele-Optics, Inc., hereby certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Tele-Optics,
       Inc.;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
       untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
       necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
       under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
       to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
       information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
       material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
       cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
       in this quarterly report;

4.     I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
       controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and
       15d-14) for the registrant and I have:

  (a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
       that material information relating to the registrant,
       including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me
       by others within those entities, particularly during the
       period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

  (b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
       controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to
       the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation
       Date"); and

  (c)  presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the
       effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based
       on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.     I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the
       registrant's auditors and to the audit committee of registrant's
       board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

  (a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
       internal controls which could adversely affect the
       registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
       financial data and have identified for the registrant's
       auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

  (b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
       or other employees who have a significant role in the
       registrant's internal controls; and

6.     I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
       significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that
       could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
       of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
       regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



                                          /s/John Little
Date: July 30, 2003                       --------------------------------
                                          John Little, President
(July 8, 1969)

#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Charles Brickner, Appellant, v. James A. Thomas, as Warden of New York City Penitentiary, Respondent.

Appeal dismissed as moot. No opinion. Concur—Capozzoli, J. F., Tilzer, McGivern, Markewich and Steuer, JJ.
§ 1107.50 Rescission of order. ( a ) *Grounds for rescinding a substantially equivalent order.* FDA may rescind a substantially equivalent order allowing a new tobacco product to be marketed if FDA determines that: ( 1 ) The tobacco product for which the order has been issued: ( i ) Does not have the same characteristics as the predicate tobacco product; or
( ii ) Has different characteristics and there is insufficient information demonstrating that it is not appropriate to require a premarket tobacco product application under section 910(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act because the product does not raise different questions of public health; or
( 2 ) The SE Report (including any submitted amendments) contains an untrue statement of material fact; or
( 3 ) Concerning an SE Report that compared the new tobacco product to a tobacco product that FDA previously found substantially equivalent, ( i ) The predicate tobacco product relied on in the SE Report has been found ineligible because its SE Report (including any amendments) contains an untrue statement of material fact; or
( ii ) A predicate tobacco product on which any of the previous substantial equivalence determinations was based, going back to the original predicate tobacco product, has been found ineligible because its SE Report (including any amendments) contains an untrue statement of material fact; or
( 4 ) FDA or the applicant has removed from the market, due to a health or safety concern related to the tobacco product: ( i ) The predicate tobacco product on which the substantial equivalence determination is based; or
( ii ) A predicate tobacco product on which any of the previous substantial equivalence determinations is based, going back to the original predicate tobacco product, if the substantial equivalence SE Report compared the new tobacco product to a tobacco product that FDA previously found substantially equivalent.
( b ) *Opportunity for a hearing.* ( 1 ) Except as provided in paragraphs (b)(2) and (3) of this section, FDA will rescind an order only after notice and opportunity for a hearing under part 16 of this chapter.
( 2 ) FDA may rescind a substantially equivalent order prior to notice and opportunity for a hearing under part 16 of this chapter if it finds that there is a reasonable probability that continued marketing of the tobacco product presents a serious risk to public health. In that case, FDA will provide the manufacturer an opportunity for a hearing as soon as possible after the rescission.
( 3 ) FDA may rescind a substantially equivalent order without notice and opportunity for a hearing under part 16 of this chapter if the applicant has notified the Agency of a mistake in the application, FDA has determined that the mistake is part of the underlying scientific determination of the order which makes the order invalid, and the applicant has agreed that FDA can rescind the order without providing notice and opportunity for a hearing under part 16 of this chapter.
#### Schimpf v. Schimpf

*12April 14, 1950.

*Julian W. Bernard,*for plaintiff.

Knight, P. J.,

And now, to wit, eo die, it is ordered that the report in the within-captioned matter be remanded to the master in order that service may be made by deputizing the Sheriff of Clearfield County to make service upon defendant, or such other sheriff in any county within this Commonwealth be deputized to make such service as indicated *13by the Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 1124, and all proceedings to stay pending compliance with this order.
#### WATKINS *v.*DETROIT UNITED RAILWAY.

Servicie of Process — Constitutional Law — Statutes—Street Railways.

This case involving a construction of Act No. 208, Pub. Acts 1901, and the constitutionality of Act No. 225, Pub. Acts 1901, follows the case of *Halladay*v. *Railway,*ante, 436, presenting the same questions.

Certiorari to Washtenaw; Kinne, J.

Submitted January 21, 1909.

(Docket No. 134.)

Decided February 2, 1909.

Case by William H. Watkins, administrator of the estate of George E. Howard, deceased, against the Detroit United Railway and the Detroit, Jackson & Chicago Railway for the negligent killing of plaintiff’s intestate. There was an order denying a motion to quash, and defendant Detroit United Railway brings certiorari.

Affirmed.

*Brennan, Donnelly & Van De Mark,*for appellant.

*De Vere Hall,*for appellee.

Per Curiam.

This case is ruled by the opinion in *Halladay*v. *Railway,*ante, 436.
§ 1230.47 Rejected containers. ( a ) In all cases where the containers are to be refused admission, the chief of the district within 1 day after hearing, or, if the importer does not appear or reply within 3 days after second notice, shall notify the District Director of Customs in duplicate accordingly.
( b ) Not later than 1 day after receipt of this notice the District Director of Customs shall sign and transmit to the importer one of the copies, which shall serve as notification to the importer that the containers must be exported under customs supervision within 3 months from such date, as provided by law; the other notice shall be retained as office record and later returned as a report to the chief of the district. In all cases the importer shall return his notice to the District Director of Customs, properly certified as to the information required, as the form provides.
§ 2701.112 Conflict of Interest. The following conflict of interest policies apply to all SBA awards of financial assistance: ( a ) Where an employee or contractor of a non-Federal entity providing assistance under an SBA award also provides services in exchange for pay in her or his private capacity, that employee or contractor may not accept as a client for her or his private services any individual or firm she or he assists under an SBA award.
( b ) No non-Federal entity providing assistance under an SBA award (nor any subrecipient, employee, or contractor of such an entity) may give preferential treatment to any client referred to it by an organization with which it has a financial, business, or other relationship.
( c ) Except where otherwise provided for by law, no non-Federal entity may seek or accept an equity stake in any firm it assists under the auspices of an SBA award. Additionally, no principal, officer, employee, or contractor of such an entity (nor any of their Close or Secondary Relatives as those terms are defined by 13 CFR 108.50) may seek or accept an equity stake or paid position in any firm the entity assists under an SBA award.