alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AVA 


NCDENR 


North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources 

Pat McCrory 

Governor 

John E. Skvarla, III 

Secretary 

February 25, 2013 

Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming 

Regional Administrator 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Region 4 

61 Forsyth Street, SW 

Atlanta, GA 30303-3104 

SUBJECT: 	 TCE Hemphill Road Site NPL Listing 

Gastonia, Gaston County, NC 

EPA ID: NCO 002 374445 

Dear Ms. Fleming, 

I am writing in response to your request for the state ofNorth Carolina's 

position regarding the proposed listing of the TCE Hemphill Road Site on the 

National Priorities List (NPL). 

The State of North Carolina supports the Environmental Protection 

Agency's efforts to propose this site for inclusion on the NPL. 

North Carolina appreciates the EPA's continued assistance to protect the 

state's public health and the environment. If you have any questions or require 

further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact Dexter Matthews, Director, 

Division of Waste Management at (919) 707-8238. 

cc: 	 Dexter Matthews, NC DWM 

Jim Bateson, NC DWM 

Franklin Hill, US EPA Region 4 

Jennifer Wendel, US EPA Region 4 

1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601 

Phone: 919-707-8600 \ Internet: www.ncdenr.gov 

An Equal Opportunity I Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled I 10% Post Consumer Paper
§ 2336.137 Who in the SSA may grant an exception to let an excluded person participate in a covered transaction? ( a ) Within the Social Security Administration, the Commissioner or the designated agency debarment official may grant an exception permitting an excluded person to participate in a particular covered transaction. If the Commissioner or the designated agency debarment official grants an exception, the exception must be in writing and state the reason(s) for deviating from the OMB guidance at 2 CFR 180.135.
( b ) An exception granted by one agency for an excluded person does not extend to the covered transactions of another agency.
§ 200.415 Required certifications. Required certifications include: ( a ) To assure that expenditures are proper and in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Federal award and approved project budgets, the annual and final fiscal reports or vouchers requesting payment under the agreements must include a certification, signed by an official who is authorized to legally bind the non-Federal entity, which reads as follows: “By signing this report, I certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that the report is true, complete, and accurate, and the expenditures, disbursements and cash receipts are for the purposes and objectives set forth in the terms and conditions of the Federal award. I am aware that any false, fictitious, or fraudulent information, or the omission of any material fact, may subject me to criminal, civil or administrative penalties for fraud, false statements, false claims or otherwise. (U.S. Code Title 18, Section 1001 and Title 31, Sections 3729-3730 and 3801-3812).”
( b ) Certification of cost allocation plan or indirect (F&A) cost rate proposal. Each cost allocation plan or indirect (F&A) cost rate proposal must comply with the following: ( 1 ) A proposal to establish a cost allocation plan or an indirect (F&A) cost rate, whether submitted to a Federal cognizant agency for indirect costs or maintained on file by the non-Federal entity, must be certified by the non-Federal entity using the Certificate of Cost Allocation Plan or Certificate of Indirect Costs as set forth in appendices III through VII, and IX of this part. The certificate must be signed on behalf of the non-Federal entity by an individual at a level no lower than vice president or chief financial officer of the non-Federal entity that submits the proposal.
( 2 ) Unless the non-Federal entity has elected the option under § 200.414(f), the Federal Government may either disallow all indirect (F&A) costs or unilaterally establish such a plan or rate when the non-Federal entity fails to submit a certified proposal for establishing such a plan or rate in accordance with the requirements. Such a plan or rate may be based upon audited historical data or such other data that have been furnished to the cognizant agency for indirect costs and for which it can be demonstrated that all unallowable costs have been excluded. When a cost allocation plan or indirect cost rate is unilaterally established by the Federal Government because the non-Federal entity failed to submit a certified proposal, the plan or rate established will be set to ensure that potentially unallowable costs will not be reimbursed.
( c ) Certifications by nonprofit organizations as appropriate that they did not meet the definition of a major nonprofit organization as defined in § 200.414(a).
( d ) See also § 200.450 for another required certification.
[78 FR 78608, Dec. 26, 2013, as amended at 79 FR 75886, Dec. 19, 2014; 85 FR 49563, Aug. 13, 2020]
| (logo) WELLS            FARGO | Corporate Trust ServicesMAC R1204-010 9062 Old Annapolis Road

Columbia, MD 21045

 

Tel:  410 884 2000

Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation 

60 Wall Street 

New York, New York 10005 

 

 

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving 

       Corporation, Commercial Mortgage Pass- Through Certificates, Series 2013- 

       CCRE7 

 

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 1, 2013 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2014 (the "Reporting Period"): 

 

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and 

 

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

 

 

 

March 9, 2015 

 

/s/  Brian Smith 

BRIAN SMITH 

Vice President

 

 

 
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  |
|------------------------|--|
EXHIBIT
31.2






CERTIFICATIONS UNDER
SECTION 302




I, Bruna
A. Bucacci, certify that:




1.    
I have reviewed this quarterly report of National
Datacomputer, Inc.




2.    
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.    
Omitted;




4.    
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:




a)    
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b)    
designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles;




c)    
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and




d)    
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.    
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




a)    
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




b)    
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.






Date:   August
20, 2008






By:      /s/  Bruna A.
Bucacci


Bruna A.
Bucacci


Chief
Accounting Officer
V2/13/20U U 23 FAX 2024335142 FAA ^ DMS 1^ y 0 I / ki y 

MEMORAMDUM 

-i'-KARTMEHTOF 

';.-KROPERMiONS 

n>:c 13 P 3^ 5S 

To the File; 

Re: In the Matter of Brice Thompson, FAA 2011-1119, 2011WP110014 

Date; 12/13/2011 

I, Vicki S. Leemon, am recusing myself from this case. Consequently, if a party to this case 

appeals from an initial decision of the Administrative Law Judge, I will not participate in 

deliberations or drafting of a final agency decision. 

Vicki S. teen^n
Before the 

 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 

 WASHINGTON, DC 

INTRA ALASKA BUSH MAIL RATES Docket OST-2003-14694 

RESPONSE OF THE UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE TO ORDER 2011-10-4 

IMPLEMENTING FINAL RATES AND MAKING QUARTERLY FUEL ADJUSTMENT 

 

Communications with respect to this 

document should be addressed to: 

 Joseph Anzalone, Esq. 

 Office of General Counsel 

 United States Postal Service 

 475 L’Enfant Plaza SW 

 Washington, DC 20260-1127 

 joseph.anzalone@usps.gov 

Date Filed: December 8, 2011 

1
2

The Postal Service presents a brief response and request for further guidance with regard to 

Order 2011-10-4, Implementing Final Rates and Making Quarterly Fuel Adjustment. 

The Postal Service wishes to communicate its efforts and the difficulty it has faced in 

applying the fuel adjustments from DOT Order 2011-10-4. It has become apparent to the 

Postal Service that further guidance by the Department is necessary to effectively apply the 

Department’s latest fuel adjustment. 

In accordance with DOT Order 2011-10-4, the Postal Service has begun the systemic 

incorporation of the fuel adjustments. However, the Postal Service is unable at this time to 

resolve a conflict between incorporating a “taper” while also applying the separate “Fixed” 

and “Flex” class rates. The separate Fixed and Flex rates had not previously been applicable 

to the Part 135 rate. The Postal Service now must assess the DOT formula utilized for the 

“taper” and apply systemic changes to enable rate implementation for both Fixed and Flex 

rates. 

With this in mind, the Postal Service requests that the Department provide the following 

additional guidance so that the Postal Service may move forward in implementing the fuel 

adjustment as ordered: 

1. Design the formula to be used for the new taper rate; 

2. Determine if this taper rate is to replace the C Rate (Bush 121 rate), D rate (Bush 135), 

and/or G rate (Float); 

3. Depending on the Department’s response to Request #2, determine whether the 

Surface Air Management Systems - Alaska should continue using the C Rate or D 

Rate in its current format; and 

4. Determine how the CME Exemption Law Process fits into the introduction of the new 

taper rate. 

The Postal Service wishes to implement the rate adjustment described in Order 2011-10-4 as 

effectively and efficiency as possible. To that end, the Postal Service requests from the 

Department the additional guidance described above.
IV 

House Calendar No. 195 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1160 

[Report No. 115–1054] 

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 88) 

to modify the boundary of the Shiloh National Military Park located 

in Tennessee and Mississippi, to establish Parker’s Crossroads Battlefield 

as an affiliated area of the National Park System, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 28, 2018 

Mr. SESSIONS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the 

bill (H.R. 88) to modify the boundary of the Shiloh 

National Military Park located in Tennessee and Mississippi, to establish Parker’s Crossroads Battlefield as 

an affiliated area of the National Park System, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it 

2 shall be in order to take from the Speaker’s table the bill 

3 (H.R. 88) to modify the boundary of the Shiloh National 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1160 RH 

1 Military Park located in Tennessee and Mississippi, to es2 tablish Parker’s Crossroads Battlefield as an affiliated 

3 area of the National Park System, and for other purposes, 

4 with the Senate amendment thereto, and to consider in 

5 the House, without intervention of any point of order, a 

6 motion offered by the chair of the Committee on Ways 

7 and Means or his designee that the House concur in the 

8 Senate amendment with an amendment consisting of the 

9 text of Rules Committee Print 115-85 modified by the 

10 amendment printed in the report of the Committee on 

11 Rules accompanying this resolution. The Senate amend12 ment and the motion shall be considered as read. The mo13 tion shall be debatable for one hour equally divided and 

14 controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of 

15 the Committee on Ways and Means. The previous question 

16 shall be considered as ordered on the motion to its adop17 tion without intervening motion. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 195 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1160 

[Report No. 115–1054] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendposes. of the National Park System, and for other pur- er’s Crossroads Battlefield as an affiliated area in Tennessee and Mississippi, to establish Park- ary of the Shiloh National Military Park located ment to the bill (H.R. 88) to modify the boundNOVEMBER 28, 2018 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
§ 1.665 What if I want to voluntarily relinquish accreditation or do not want to renew accreditation? ( a ) *Notice to FDA of intent to relinquish or not to renew accreditation.* A third-party certification body must notify FDA electronically, in English, at least 60 days before voluntarily relinquishing accreditation or before allowing accreditation to expire without seeking renewal. The certification body must provide the name and contact information of the custodian who will maintain the records required under § 1.658(a) after the date of relinquishment or the date accreditation expires, as applicable, and make them available to FDA as required by § 1.658(b) and (c). The contact information for the custodian must include, at a minimum, an email address and the physical address where the records required by § 1.658(a) will be located.
( b ) *Notice to recognized accreditation body and eligible entities of intent to relinquish or not to renew accreditation.* No later than 15 business days after notifying FDA under paragraph (a) of this section, the certification body must notify its recognized accreditation body and any eligible entity with current certifications that it intends to relinquish accreditation or to allow its accreditation to expire, specifying the date on which relinquishment or expiration will occur. The recognized accreditation body must establish and maintain records of such notification under § 1.625(a).
( c ) *Effect of voluntary relinquishment or expiration of accreditation on food or facility certifications issued to eligible entities.* A food or facility certification issued by a third-party certification body prior to relinquishment or expiration of its accreditation will remain in effect until the certification expires. If FDA has reason to believe that a certification issued for purposes of section 801(q) or 806 of the FD&C Act is not valid or reliable, FDA may refuse to consider the certification in determining the admissibility of the article of food for which the certification was offered or in determining the importer's eligibility for participation in VQIP.
( d ) *Public notice of voluntary relinquishment or expiration of accreditation.* FDA will provide notice on the Web site described in § 1.690 of the voluntary relinquishment or expiration of accreditation of a certification body under this subpart.
# EUR-Lex - 31988R1494 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31988R1494

**Council Regulation (EEC) No 1494/88 of 3 May 1988 on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Islamic Federal Republic of the Comoros on fishing off Comoros **

*
Official Journal L 137 , 02/06/1988 P. 0018 - 0018 *

COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) No 1494/88 of 3 May 1988 on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Islamic Federal Republic of the Comoros on fishing off Comoros

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, and in particular Article 43 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission (1),

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (2),

Whereas the Community and the Islamic Federal Republic of the Comoros have negotiated and initialled an Agreement on fishing off Comoros; whereas this provides fishing opportunities for Community fishermen in waters over which Comoros has sovereignty or jurisdiction;

Whereas it is in the Community's interest to approve this Agreement,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1 The Agreement on fishing between the European Economic Community and the Islamic Federal Republic of the Comoros on fishing off Comoros is hereby approved on behalf of the Community.

The text of the Agreement is attached to this Regulation.

Article 2 The President of the Council is hereby authorized to designate the persons empowered to sign the Agreement in order to bind the Community.

Article 3 This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 3 May 1988.

For the Council The President M. BANGEMANN (3) OJ No C 73, 19. 3. 1988, p. 6.

(4) OJ No C 122, 9. 5. 1988.

EWG:L555UMBE12.96 FF: 5UEN; SETUP: 01; Hoehe: 344 mm; 42 Zeilen; 1687 Zeichen;

Bediener: MARK Pr.: B;

Kunde: 41727 Montan England 12
NOTE: Pursuant to Fed. Cir. R. 47.6, this disposition is not citable as precedent. It is a public record. 

## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

04-3415

JAMES E. HAYNIE, Petitioner,

v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.

__________ ________________ DE CIDED: April 5, 2005

__________________________ Before MAYER, RADER, and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM. James E. Haynie appeals the final de cision of the Merit Systems Protection Board dismissing his claim that he was impr operly removed from employment by the Department of Veterans Affair s for lack of jurisdiction. Haynie v. Dep’t of Veterans Affairs , CH315H040152-I-1 (MSPB Jun. 24, 2004). We affirm

. We must affirm the board’s decision to dismiss Haynie’s appeal unless he establishes that the decision is: (1) arbitrary, capricious , an abuse of di scretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law; (2) obtained without procedures required by law, rule, or regulation ha ving been followed; or (3) unsupported by substantial evidence.5 U.S.C. § 7703(c) (2000). “The jurisdiction of the board is not plenar y. Rather, it is limited to those matters specifically entru sted to it by statute or regulation.” Serrao v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd. , 95 F.3d 1569, 1573 (Fed. Cir. 1996); see 5 U.S.C. § 7701(a). A petitioner has the bur den of est ablis hing b oard jurisdiction by a preponderance of the evidenc e and we review the board’s decis ion de novo

. See Serrao , 95 F.3d at 1573. We agree with the board that it lacked jurisdiction to hear Haynie’s appeal because he was a probationar y employee. The board’s jurisdiction to hear an employee’s appeal of a removal is circumscribed by st atute. See 5 U.S.C. §§ 7511- 7514, 4301-4305. Excluded from its jurisdic tion are appeals concerning “the reduction in grade or removal of an employee . . . w ho is serving a probationary or t r ial period . . . .” Id. § 4303(f)(2). Haynie’s allegations of discrimination must also be dismissed because he failed to establish board jurisd iction over his prob at ionary termination. Se e Synan v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd. , 765 F.2d 1099, 1100-01 (Fed. Cir. 1985).

04-3415 2
###### Editorial Note on Part 180

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 180 appear at 79 FR 75879, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 180.985 Person.

*Person* means any individual, corporation, partnership, association, unit of government, or legal entity, however organized.
#### § 910.356 Audits.

See Subpart F of this part (Sections 910.500 through 910.521) for specific DOE regulations which apply to audits of DOE's For-Profit Recipients. For-Profit entities are an exception to the Single Audit requirements contained in Subpart F of 2 CFR 200 and therefore the regulations contained in 2 CFR 910 Subpart F apply instead.
§ 5800.880 What factors may influence the debarring official during reconsideration? The debarring official may reduce or terminate your debarment based on: ( a ) Newly discovered material evidence;
( b ) A reversal of the conviction or civil judgment upon which your debarment was based;
( c ) A bona fide change in ownership or management;
( d ) Elimination of other causes for which the debarment was imposed; or
( e ) Other reasons the debarring official finds appropriate.