alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1100 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1100

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide capital gains 
           treatment for certain self-created musical works.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 23, 2005

   Mr. Bunning (for himself, Mr. Conrad, Mr. Hatch, Mrs. Boxer, Mr. 
  Alexander, and Mr. Durbin) introduced the following bill; which was 
          read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide capital gains 
           treatment for certain self-created musical works.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Songwriters Capital Gains Tax Equity 
Act''.

SEC. 2. CAPITAL GAINS TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN SELF-CREATED MUSICAL WORKS.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (b) of section 1221 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to capital asset defined) is amended by 
redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4) and by inserting after 
paragraph (2) the following new paragraph:
            ``(3) Sale or exchange of self-created musical works.--At 
        the election of the taxpayer, paragraphs (1) and (3) of 
        subsection (a) shall not apply with respect to any sale or 
        exchange of musical compositions or copyrights in musical works 
        by a taxpayer described in subsection (a)(3).''.
    (b) Limitation on Charitable Contributions.--Subparagraph (A) of 
section 170(e)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by 
inserting ``(determined without regard to section 1221(b)(3))'' after 
``long-term capital gain''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
§ 1100.3 Definitions. For the purposes of this part: *Accessory* means any product that is intended or reasonably expected to be used with or for the human consumption of a tobacco product; does not contain tobacco and is not made or derived from tobacco; and meets either of the following: ( 1 ) Is not intended or reasonably expected to affect or alter the performance, composition, constituents, or characteristics of a tobacco product; or
( 2 ) Is intended or reasonably expected to affect or maintain the performance, composition, constituents, or characteristics of a tobacco product but ( i ) Solely controls moisture and/or temperature of a stored tobacco product; or
( ii ) Solely provides an external heat source to initiate but not maintain combustion of a tobacco product.
Component or part means any software or assembly of materials intended or reasonably expected: ( 1 ) To alter or affect the tobacco product's performance, composition, constituents, or characteristics; or
( 2 ) To be used with or for the human consumption of a tobacco product. Component or part excludes anything that is an accessory of a tobacco product.
Package or packaging means a pack, box, carton, or container of any kind or, if no other container, any wrapping (including cellophane), in which a tobacco product is offered for sale, sold, or otherwise distributed to consumers.
*Tobacco product,* as stated in section 201(rr) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act in relevant part: ( 1 ) Means any product made or derived from tobacco, or containing nicotine from any source, that is intended for human consumption, including any component, part, or accessory of a tobacco product (except for raw materials other than tobacco used in manufacturing a component, part, or accessory of a tobacco product); and
( 2 ) Does not mean an article that is a drug under section 201(g)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act; a device under section 201(h) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act; a combination product described in section 503(g) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act; or a food under 201(f) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act if such article contains no nicotine or no more than trace amounts of naturally occurring nicotine.
[81 FR 29102, May 10, 2016, as amended at 88 FR 16552, Mar. 20, 2023]
P.O. BOX 3086 OSHKOS H, WI 54903

- 3086 • T el 920.426.6522 • F ax 920.426.6560 • WWW.EAA.ORG June 11, 2013

U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Operations West Building

– ground floor

Room W12

- 140 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590

Dear Sirs:

Reference: FAA Exemption No. 10356, Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2011

- 0656



### EAA ( the Experimental Aircraft Association) is the world leader in recreational aviation. With an international membership of more than 1 77 ,000 people in more than 110 nations, EAA brings together aviation enthusiasts, pilots and aircraft owners who are dedicated t o s haring the Spirit of

Aviation by promoting the continued growth of aviation, the preservation of its history and a

commitment to aviation’s future.

The conditions and reasons regarding public interest and safety, presented in the original petition date d June 17, 2011 and recognized as Exemption 10356, remain unchanged.

EAA requests FAA Exemption No. 10356 be renewed for a 2

- year period.

The Experimental Aircraft Association, Inc. (EAA) is a non

- stock Wisconsin corporation, which has been granted 501( c)(3) status by the Internal Revenue Service.

For questions concerning this renewal, contact the undersigned at 920

- 426

- 6103.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Harger Government Advocacy Specialist
#### § 1316.60 Objections; offer of proof.

If any party in the hearing objects to the admission or rejection of any evidence or to other limitation of the scope of any examination or cross-examination, he shall state briefly the grounds for such objection without extended argument or debate thereon except as permitted by the presiding officer. A ruling of the presiding officer on any such objection shall be a part of the transcript together with such offer of proof as has been made if a proper foundation has been laid for its admission. An offer of proof made in connection with an objection taken to any ruling of the presiding officer rejecting or excluding proffered oral testimony shall consist of a statement of the substance of the evidence which the party contends would be adduced by such testimony; and, if the excluded evidence consists of evidence in documentary or written form a copy of such evidence shall be marked for identification and shall accompany the records as the offer of proof.
# EUR-Lex - 31990D0257 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31990D0257

**90/257/EEC: Commission Decision of 10 May 1990 laying down the criteria for the acceptance for breeding purposes of pure-bred breeding sheep and goats and the use of their semen, ova or embryos **

*
Official Journal L 145 , 08/06/1990 P. 0038 - 0038 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 32 P. 0223 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 32 P. 0223 *

*****

COMMISSION DECISION

of 10 May 1990

laying down the criteria for the acceptance for breeding purposes of pure-bred breeding sheep and goats and the use of their semen, ova or embryos

(90/257/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 89/361/EEC of 30 May 1989 concerning pure-bred breeding sheep and goats (1), and in particular Article 4 thereof,

Whereas Directive 89/361/EEC is intended gradually to liberalize intra-Community trade in pure-bred breeding sheep and goats; whereas, in this connection, additional harmonization with regard to the acceptance for breeding purposes of such animals and their semen, ova and embryos is necessary;

Whereas the provisions concerning acceptance for breeding relate to animals as well as their semen, ova and embryos;

Whereas it should be provided that semen, ova and embryos may be handled only by officially approved staff in order to ensure the guarantees necessary for attaining the desired end;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Zootechnics,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Without prejudice to Article 2 all pure-bred breeding sheep and goats, whether male or female, which are registered in a flock-book shall be accepted for breeding.

Article 2

1. Male pure-bred breeding sheep and goats shall be accepted for the purposes of artificial insemination and use of their semen if they have undergone tests for monitoring their performance and assessing their genetic value pursuant to Commission Decision 90/256/EEC (1).

2. Male pure-bred breeding and goats shall be accepted for the purposes of official testing and use of their semen, within the quantitative limits required for monitoring their performance and assessing their genetic value pursuant to Decision 90/256/EEC.

3. Female pure-bred breeding sheep and goats shall be accepted for breeding and use of their ova and embryos.

Article 3

The semen, ova and embryos must be collected, treated and stored by an officially approved centre or officially approved personnel.

Article 4

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 May 1990.

For the Commission

Ray MAC SHARRY

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 153, 6. 6. 1989, p. 30.

(2) See page 35 of this Official Journal.
#### § 1301.15 Additional information.

The Administrator may require an applicant to submit such documents or written statements of fact relevant to the application as he/she deems necessary to determine whether the application should be granted. The failure of the applicant to provide such documents or statements within a reasonable time after being requested to do so shall be deemed to be a waiver by the applicant of an opportunity to present such documents or facts for consideration by the Administrator in granting or denying the application.

[62 FR 13948, Mar. 24, 1997]
# m8736.docx

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 6.2.2018 C(2018) 805 final To the notifying part y Subject : Case M. 8736 – TOOHIL TELECOM / EIRCOM Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 1 and Article 57 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area 2 Dear Sir or Madam, 1. On 08 January 2018 , the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which Toohil Telecom Holdings Limited (" Toohil Telecom", Ireland), ultimately controlled by Mr. Xavier Niel (France) acquire s within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of Eircom Holdco S.A. ("Eircom", Luxembourg) by way of purchase of shares . 3 2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are: - for Toohil Telecom: part of the group of companies controlled by Mr. Xavier Niel which are mainly focused on investments in the following sectors: telecoms, media, technologies, start-ups businesses and real estate. In particular, Mr. Xavier Niel controls Iliad, a French company active in the provision of fixed and mobile telephony and internet access providing and hosting services. - for Eircom: Eircom offers a range of fixed voice, data, high speed broadband, mobile, and TV services, as well as Voice over Internet Protocol and Wi-Fi services to the individual consumers, households, business users, wholesale customers, small and medium enterprises, and government in the Republic of Ireland. It also offers a range of connectivity services to the public sector customers in Northern Ireland, as well as to Irish companies with subsidiaries or branches in the United Kingdom. 3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5 ( c ) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 . 4 4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation and Article 57 of the EEA Agreement . For the Commission (Signed)
Johannes LAITENBERGER Director - General
(1)
OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ( the ' Merger Regulation ' ). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( ' TFEU ' ) has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of ' Community ' by ' Union ' and ' common market ' by ' internal market ' . The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.
(2) OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3 ( the ' EEA Agreement ' ).
(3) Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 014 , 16 . 1 . 2018 , p. 11 .
(4)
OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5 .
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 960 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to limit gifts to Members, officers, and employees of the House from State and local governments. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 27, 2006 

Mr. FLAKE (for himself, Mr. PENCE, Mrs. MYRICK, and Mr. CASE) submitted 

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to 

limit gifts to Members, officers, and employees of the 

House from State and local governments. 

1 Resolved, That (a) clause 5(a)(3)(O) of rule XXV of 

2 the Rules of the House of Representatives is amended by 

3 striking ‘‘, by a State or local government,’’. 

4 (b) Clause 5(b)(1)(A) of rule XXV of the Rules of 

5 the House of Representatives is amended by inserting ‘‘a 

6 State or local government or’’ before ‘‘a private source’’. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
Editorial Note on Part 106
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 106 appear at 81 FR 49895, July 29, 2016.

§ 106.150 Notification of an adulterated or misbranded infant formula. ( a ) A manufacturer shall promptly notify the Food and Drug Administration in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section when the manufacturer has knowledge (that is, actual knowledge that the manufacturer had, or the knowledge which a reasonable person would have had under like circumstances or which would have been obtained upon the exercise of due care) that reasonably supports the conclusion that an infant formula that has been processed by the manufacturer and that has left an establishment subject to the control of the manufacturer: ( 1 ) May not provide the nutrients required by section 412(i) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 350a(i)) or by regulations issued under section 412(i)(2); or
( 2 ) May be otherwise adulterated or misbranded.
( b ) The notification made according to paragraph (a) of this section shall be made by telephone, to the Director of the appropriate Food and Drug Administration district office. After normal business hours (8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.), the Food and Drug Administration's emergency number, 1-866-300-4374 shall be used. The manufacturer shall promptly send written confirmation of the notification to the Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Office of Compliance, Division of Enforcement (HFS-605), Recall Coordinator, 5001 Campus Dr., College Park, MD 20740, and to the appropriate Food and Drug Administration district office.
[79 FR 8059, Feb. 10, 2014, as amended at 88 FR 17718, Mar. 24, 2023]
Editorial Note on Part 112
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 112 appear at 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 112.1 What food is covered by this part? ( a ) Unless it is excluded from this part under § 112.2, food that is produce within the meaning of this part and that is a raw agricultural commodity (RAC) is covered by this part. This includes a produce RAC that is grown domestically and a produce RAC that will be imported or offered for import in any State or territory of the United States, the District of Columbia, or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
( b ) For the purpose of this part and subject to the exemptions and qualified exemptions therein, covered produce includes all of the following: ( 1 ) Fruits and vegetables such as almonds, apples, apricots, apriums, Artichokes-globe-type, Asian pears, avocados, babacos, bananas, Belgian endive, blackberries, blueberries, boysenberries, brazil nuts, broad beans, broccoli, Brussels sprouts, burdock, cabbages, Chinese cabbages (Bok Choy, mustard, and Napa), cantaloupes, carambolas, carrots, cauliflower, celeriac, celery, chayote fruit, cherries (sweet), chestnuts, chicory (roots and tops), citrus (such as clementine, grapefruit, lemons, limes, mandarin, oranges, tangerines, tangors, and uniq fruit), cowpea beans, cress-garden, cucumbers, curly endive, currants, dandelion leaves, fennel-Florence, garlic, genip, gooseberries, grapes, green beans, guavas, herbs (such as basil, chives, cilantro, oregano, and parsley), honeydew, huckleberries, Jerusalem artichokes, kale, kiwifruit, kohlrabi, kumquats, leek, lettuce, lychees, macadamia nuts, mangos, other melons (such as Canary, Crenshaw and Persian), mulberries, mushrooms, mustard greens, nectarines, onions, papayas, parsnips, passion fruit, peaches, pears, peas, peas-pigeon, peppers (such as bell and hot), pine nuts, pineapples, plantains, plums, plumcots, quince, radishes, raspberries, rhubarb, rutabagas, scallions, shallots, snow peas, soursop, spinach, sprouts (such as alfalfa and mung bean), strawberries, summer squash (such as patty pan, yellow and zucchini), sweetsop, Swiss chard, taro, tomatoes, turmeric, turnips (roots and tops), walnuts, watercress, watermelons, and yams; and
( 2 ) Mixes of intact fruits and vegetables (such as fruit baskets).
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                           National Datacomputer, Inc.
          Statement recomputation of net income (loss) per common share


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              --------------------- ---------------------
                                                                     March 31,             March 30,
                                                                       1998                  1997
                                                              --------------------- ---------------------
<S>                                                            <C>                   <C>            
Net loss, as reported                                          $     (381,844)       $     (298,328)

Preferred stock preference items:

Discount inherent in conversion terms of Series C and D
     convertible preferred stock upon issuance                        (46,602)                 -

Warrant                                                              (214,000)                 -

Interest on Series B, C and D convertible preferred stock            (102,750)             (96,500)
                                                              --------------------- ---------------------

Total preferred stock preference item                                (363,352)             (96,500)

Net loss attributable to common stockholders                   $     (745,196)       $     (394,828)
                                                              --------------------- ---------------------

Weighted average shares outstanding                                 1,628,332             1,251,925
                                                              ===================== =====================

Net loss  per share                                            $        (0.46)       $        (0.32)
                                                              ===================== =====================

</TABLE>

Note:    Due to the Company's net loss, no exercises of options or conversions
         or preferred stock have been assumed, all such items would be
         anti-dilutive.
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Kyle Greninger, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Kevin B. McGrath, J.), rendered January 3, 2016, convicting him, upon a plea of guilty, of resisting arrest, and imposing sentence.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment of conviction (Kevin B. McGrath, J.), rendered January 3, 2016, affirmed.</p><p>The renewed application by appellant's counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted (<i>see Anders v California</i>, 386 US 738 [1967]; <i>People v Saunders</i>, 52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant's assigned counsel in accordance with our prior order, and, upon an independent review of the record, agree that there is no valid appealable issue that could be raised on appeal.</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: April 17, 2018<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>