alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 770.9 What conditions apply to DOE indemnification of claims against a person or entity based on the release or threatened release of a hazardous substance or pollutant or contaminant attributable to DOE? ( a ) If an agreement for the transfer of real property for economic development contains an indemnification provision, the person or entity requesting indemnification for a particular claim must: ( 1 ) Notify the Field Office Manager in writing within two years after such claim accrues under § 770.11 of this part;
( 2 ) Furnish the Field Office Manager, or such other DOE official as the Field Office Manager designates, with evidence or proof of the claim;
( 3 ) Furnish the Field Office Manager, or such other DOE official as the Field Office Manager designates, with copies of pertinent papers (*e.g.,* legal documents) received by the person or entity;
( 4 ) If requested by DOE, provide access to records and personnel of the person or entity for purposes of defending or settling the claim; and
( 5 ) Provide certification that the person or entity making the claim did not contribute to any such release or threatened release.
( b ) DOE will enter into an indemnification agreement if DOE determines that indemnification is essential for the purpose of facilitating reuse or redevelopment.
( c ) DOE may not indemnify any person or entity for a claim if the person or entity contributed to the release or threatened release of a hazardous substance or pollutant or contaminant that is the basis of the claim.
( d ) DOE may not indemnify a person or entity for a claim made under an indemnification agreement if the person or entity refuses to allow DOE to settle or defend the claim.
( e ) Any indemnification provided will apply to any successor, assignee, transferee, lender or lessee of the original entity that acquires ownership or control.
[65 FR 10689, Feb. 29, 2000, as amended at 78 FR 67927, Nov. 13, 2013]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6087

RICHARD LAMAR FENSTERMACHER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

L. W. JARVIS, Assistant Warden; C. N. LEWIS,

Major; D. R. GUILLORY, Warden; LORETTA KELLEY,

Assistant Warden; DONNA ANDERSON; V. WASHINGTON; I. T. GILMORE, Captain; C. E. DUNMOODIE,

Captain; R. W. ROWLETTE, Lieutenant,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge.

(CA-95-25)

Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 4, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Lamar Fenstermacher, Appellant Pro Se. Lance Bradford

Leggitt, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond,

Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* The parties consented to disposition of this case by a

magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(c) (West 1993).

2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order* denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the magistrate judge's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Fenstermacher v. Jarvis, No. CA-95-25 (E.D. Va. Dec.

6, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 430 

Expressing support for the designation of Journeyman Lineman Recognition 

Day. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 6, 2017 

Ms. SA ́NCHEZ (for herself, Mr. MCKINLEY, Mr. NORCROSS, Ms. DELBENE, 

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska, Mr. LARSEN of Washington, Mr. GARAMENDI, Mr. 

JOHNSON of Georgia, Ms. DELAURO, Mr. POCAN, and Mr. LYNCH) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of Journeyman 

Lineman Recognition Day. 

Whereas journeymen linemen provide a vital service on a 

daily basis; 

Whereas journeyman linemen put their lives on the line every 

day to assure safe and reliable power for the American 

people; 

Whereas journeyman linemen work at heights and in close 

proximity to energized electric lines, and in emergencies 

they often work extremely long hours under sometimes 

dangerous conditions to restore power; 


rfrederick on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 430 IH 

Whereas Henry Miller, the first elected president of the 

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, was 

killed on July 10, 1896, at just 38 years old; 

Whereas Henry Miller died of injuries sustained while troubleshooting an electrical outage; and 

Whereas there should be a day to honor those industry first 

responders who have given their lives in the line of duty 

along with those who provide skillful service in times of 

local or national crisis: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of Journeyman 

3 Lineman Recognition Day; 

4 (2) honors and recognizes the contributions of 

5 the countless individuals who often place themselves 

6 in harm’s way to serve their communities; and 

7 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

8 to observe Journeyman Lineman Recognition Day 

9 with appropriate reflection. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
#### MILLER, Appellant, v. HARVEY, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 20, 1914.)

Action by Charles E. Miller against George Harvey. W. F. Goldbeck, of New York City, for appellant. A. S. Andrews, of New York City, for respondent.

No opinion. Determination (83 Misc. Rep. 59, 144 N. Y. Supp. 624) affirmed, with costs, on opinion of PAGE, J. Order filed.
Exhibit 31.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Michael R. Beecham, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of SBH ASSOCIATES, INC.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  5. I, as the certifying officer have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  Date: October 7, 2016 By: /s/MICHAEL R. BEECHAM Michael R. Beecham Chief Executive Officer
§ 910.358 Profit or fee for SBIR/STTR. ( a ) As authorized by 2 CFR 200.400 (g), DOE may expressly allow non-federal entities to earn a profit or fee resulting from Federal financial assistance.
( b ) DOE allows a profit or fee to be paid under two of its financial assistance programs only: Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer Research (STTR).
( c ) Awards under these programs will contain a specific provision which allows a profit or fee to be paid.
( d ) Profit or Fee is unallowable for all other DOE programs which award grants and cooperative agreements.
EX-10.1






LAS VEGAS—(BUSINESS WIRE)—July 26, 2006—Cash Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CKNN -
News), a provider of cash access solutions for the gaming industry, announced today that it
has entered the Chickasaw Nation’s newest gaming facility, Riverwind Casino. Cash Systems provides
the casino with a complete line of cash access services including the all-in-1 atm, credit card
cash advance, debit card cash advance and check cashing.



Riverwind Casino, located in Norman, Oklahoma, opened on July 17, 2006 and includes 2,300
electronic gaming devices and 50 table games throughout 219,000 square feet of space. Riverwind
Casino is one of 15 gaming centers owned and operated by the Chickasaw Nation.



Michael Rumbolz, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Cash Systems, said “Riverwind Casino is a
beautiful facility that will further elevate the gaming market in Oklahoma. Today’s announcement
reflects our commitment and dedication to product innovation and customer service, which continues
to strengthen our relationships with important customers like the Chickasaw Nation.”



About Cash Systems, Inc.



Cash Systems, Inc., located in Las Vegas, with additional offices in San Diego and Minneapolis, is
a provider of cash-access and related services to the retail and gaming industries. Cash Systems’
products include its proprietary cash advance systems, ATMs and check cashing solutions. Please
visit http://www.cashsystemsinc.com for more information.



This press release may contain forward-looking statements, including the Company’s beliefs about
its business prospects and future results of operations. These statements involve risks and
uncertainties. Among the important additional factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those forward-looking statements are risks associated with the overall economic
environment, the successful execution of the Company’s plan of operation, changes in the Company’s
anticipated earnings, continuation of current contracts, gaming and other applicable regulations,
and other factors detailed in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
including its most recent Forms 10K and 10Q. In addition, the factors underlying Company forecasts
are dynamic and subject to change and therefore those forecasts speak only as of the date they are
given. The Company does not undertake to update any forecasts that it may make available to the
investing public.
#### § 801.1112 Conference.

Upon receipt of a request for a conference, the official imposing the sanction shall arrange such a conference with the participant or contractor and may designate another official to conduct the conference. The participant shall be given the opportunity to be heard within 10 business days of receipt of the request. This conference precedes, and is in addition to, the formal hearing provided if an appeal is taken under § 801.1113. Although formal rules of procedure do not apply to the conference, the participant or contractor may be represented by counsel and may present all relevant information and materials to the official or designee. After consideration of the information and materials presented, the official shall, in writing, advise the participant or contractor of the decision to withdraw, modify or affirm the limited denial of participation. If the decision is made to affirm all or a portion of the remaining period of exclusion, the participant shall be advised of the right to request a formal hearing in writing within 30 days of receipt of the notice of decision. This decision shall be issued promptly, but in no event later than 20 days after the conference and receipt of materials.
#### § 1136.700 Purpose of OAR Article VII.

OAR Article VII addresses post-closeout funding adjustments and recipients' continuing responsibilities after award closeout. It thereby implements OMB guidance in 2 CFR 200.344.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 04-1229

___________

Jordan Blair, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Western

* District of Arkansas.

Bob Wills, also known as W. B. *

Wills, also known as Bobby Ray *

Wills; Betty Sue Wills; Sam * [UNPUBLISHED]

Gerhardt; Deborah Gerhardt; Bo *

Gerhardt; Julie Gerhardt; Drew *

Parrish; Robert O'Briant; Robert *

Kennedy; Mountain Park Boarding *

Academy; Palm Lane Baptist Church, *

Inc., *

*

Appellees, *

----------------------------------------------- *

State of Arkansas, Crawford County; *

Ron Blair; Jan Blair; Chris Blair; *

Timmy Blair, *

*

Movants Below - *

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: November 12, 2004

Filed: November 16, 2004

___________

Before MURPHY, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
1

The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the

Western District of Arkansas.

-2-

___________

PER CURIAM.

Jordan Blair appeals the district court’s1

 order quashing his subpoena for his

juvenile records. Appellees Bob and Betty Sue Wills; Sam, Deborah, Bo, and Julie

Gerhardt; Drew Parrish; Robert O’Briant; Robert Kennedy; and Palm Lane Baptist

Church have moved to supplement the record on appeal with a complaint, a motion,

and multiple court orders. We grant this motion. 

We also dismiss this appeal as moot, because the case for which Blair sought

a subpoena is no longer proceeding in the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Missouri, but is instead pending in multiple appeals in this court. See

McCook Metals LLC v. Alcoa, Inc., 249 F.3d 330, 334 (4th Cir. 2001) (ancillary

court’s power to issue subpoenas is dependent on jurisdiction of court where

underlying action is pending); Sullivan v. Dickson, 283 F.2d 725, 727 (9th Cir. 1960)

(motion to inspect documents under Fed. R. Civ. P. 34 or 45(b) cannot be granted in

absence of pending proceeding), cert. denied, 366 U.S. 951 (1961); cf. 9A Charles

Alan Wright & Arthur R. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 2456 at 29 (2d ed.

1995) (“subpoena may issue only in aid of a pending action”). 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).

______________________________
#### In the Matter of Bruce Dribbon, Petitioner, v New York State Education Department, Board of Regents, Respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (initiated in this court pursuant to subdivision 4 of section 6510 of the Education Law) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Education, which suspended petitioner’s license to practice podiatry for a period of three months and imposed a fine of $1,000. Petitioner’s contention that the penalty imposed is disproportionate to the offense and shocking to one’s sense of fairness is without merit (see *Matter of Foreman v Board of Regents of Univ. of State of N. Y.,*75 AD2d 953, mot for lv to app den 51 NY2d 704). We have examined petitioner’s other contentions and find them to be unpersuasive. Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Casey and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
United States Tax Court

Washington, DC 20217

STEPHEN J. MAJOR,

Petitioner

v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL 

REVENUE,

Respondent

Docket No. 6224-21.

ORDER

Pursuant to Rule 152(b), Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure, it is

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall transmit herewith to petitioner 

and to respondent a copy of the pages of the transcript of the trial in the above case 

before Judge James S. Halpern at Phoenix, Arizona, on April 11, 2022, containing 

his oral findings of fact and opinion rendered at the trial session at which this case 

was heard.

In accordance with the oral findings of fact and opinion, a decision will be 

entered for respondent except with respect to I.R.C.section 6662(a) accuracy-related 

penalty for taxable year 2017.

(Signed) James S. Halpern

Judge

Served 05/26/22
	
       	       

 


 !
" #"!$ %

&'"()
" *+
%,-. /)01.2.
)"%

%"

"%
 3!!4%"!333%% 
.

"%%%
 %"%"%

%
563%
7%
"! 1
(

)
.8)"%1!
9%!!%
 "
!
"


%%
"

% "
3
"

"
%%
7%
"!1
(

)
$

 
33
%%!!"
!
(%%
 1

%
%
"

3
 
%%
":;

"!
%83<$ ""
!%

!%3<$1

% 

%
""
!%

!%;"%
"
 %%
$4
4!!%%

3
=
%%
" "

#">4

3!
%

%%

.

3
"


3"

%: '%
%%
%%
":"
"%
%8!

 !!4
%%
":!3"
"

!

 

8

3<$
3"(
!
!

 <$3"%
"

8

$!3<
 3"%8"
"%3

 
""%

8%3

JSH

- JSH

 -














	




















	


































 
!








"

#

"$
"



!



%

"&
!







%"
"



#

"'(


!"



&
%"&




#"


"




)
"

"

#



"'$
"&





#






"




*"

#"

'

(

#
"






'+

&











!


"

#

"

!

#

!








'

,


"



"




#


"
""
#
'$"






#

"

#





"



"




	
       	       

 


  !"#$%#&'(%))*$$*%#"+,- . / 0 1234#5)&'(%))*$$*%#"+,- . / 	0	 - 


6
 78
6 
8  9"":54)5#&'(%))*$$*%#"+,- . / 0
;	1 <"=)5#&'(%))*$$*%#"+,- . / 0,
;	  >



 ? 
8@,
 
  ?

8
, 

86
 



 
8
6A  -
B6
7 
,88  -
.7
C6C
 
D
  E?,
F  ,
0 
8
 G

, JSH














	




















	





























  !"#$%&!$''())($%

*
! +

,-./%)(0/-/$%123%(42"

4$%0$(0"0)-.'1%)%$.0(35.)(&-"%

%.-"33.%""/3$'5%")3%(%"%/4%$'

&%1"5%3$%/(0'"/1253%$(3%3$%/(012$0%

2%)$%(5-14$%6(/")"7

$.%"())))($($(7-8-("33$%/"39(

"5(3"15%$&()($)$43.%%&%1"('

%$%(03$%"3$4$.%"/"&&%(4(/

"33.%"32$4%")3%(123$'"%(029%(

%")3%("0"()&%1"5%3$%/(0!



:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

%(1)52-
+ ;;

%")3%(1% "



:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

<$%(")-<+	 ;;

%$$4%"/% "
###### Editorial Note on Part 9

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 9 appear at 82 FR 52825, Nov. 15, 2017.

#### § 9.6 Communications.

Except as otherwise indicated, communications relating to this part shall be addressed to the Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act Officer, may be sent to the NRC by mail addressed to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; by hand delivery to the NRC's offices at 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland; or, where practicable, by electronic submission via facsimile to (301) 415-5130 or e-mail to *foia@nrc.gov.* Electronic submissions must be made in a manner that enables the NRC to receive, read, authenticate, distribute, and archive the submission, and process and retrieve it a single page at a time. Detailed guidance on making electronic submissions can be obtained by visiting the NRC's Web site at *http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html;* by e-mail to *MSHD.Resource@nrc.gov;* or by writing the Office of the Chief Information Officer, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. The guidance discusses, among other topics, the formats the NRC can accept, the use of electronic signatures, and the treatment of nonpublic information.

[68 FR 58799, Oct. 10, 2003, as amended at 74 FR 62680, Dec. 1, 2009; 80 FR 74978, Dec. 1, 2015]
PGI 229.7002-4 Information required by HM

Customs and Excise.

(a) School bus contracts. Provide one copy of the contract and all modifications to HM Customs and

Excise.

(b) Road fuel contracts. For contracts that involve an application for relief from duty on the road fuel

used in performance of the contract, provide—

(1) To HM Customs and Excise—

(i) Contract number;

(ii) Name and address of contractor;

(iii) Type of work (e.g., laundry, transportation);

(iv) Area of work; and

(v) Period of performance.

(2) To the regional office of HM Customs and Excise to which the contractor applied for relief from

the duty on road fuel—one copy of the contract.

(c) Other contracts awarded to United Kingdom firms. Provide information when requested by HM

Customs and Excise.

Parent topic: PGI 229.7002 Tax exemption in the United Kingdom.
#### § 1134.200 Purpose of REP Article II.

REP Article II of the general terms and conditions specifies requirements related to financial reporting. It thereby implements OMB guidance in 2 CFR 200.327 and the portions of 2 CFR 200.301 and 200.343(a) that are specific to financial reporting under grants and cooperative agreements.
#### Daughtry, *pro*ami, *v.*Stewart.

*Petition by Surety on Guardian's Bond for Supersedeas of Execution and P)ischargefrom Decree on Fined Settlement.*

1. Affirmed on authority of preceding case of *Evans v. Daughtry.*

Appeal from Bullock Probate Court.

Heard before Hon. S. F. Frazer.

Norman & Son, and Abercrombie & Bilbro, for appellant.

W. F. Foster, *contra.*

CLOPTON, J.

Affirmed on authority of *Evans v. Daughtry,*84 Ala. 68.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D2023

- 0247

_____________________________
K ENNETH L AMAR R EESE , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Francis J. Allman, Jr. , Judge

.

June 10, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
O STERHAUS , C.J., and R AY and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 J essica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Tyler Kemper Payne
, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody
, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.