alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                             STRATEX NETWORKS, INC.

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the periodic report of Stratex Networks, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Charles D. Kissner, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely
for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code,
that to the best of my knowledge:

        (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

        (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
        the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.




Date: November 14, 2002                            /s/ Charles D. Kissner
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Charles D. Kissner
                                                   Chief Executive Officer
H. Res. 734 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

February 9 (legislative day, February 8), 2018. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to take from the Speaker’s table the bill (H.R. 

1892) to amend title 4, United States Code, to provide for 

the flying of the flag at half-staff in the event of the death 

of a first responder in the line of duty, with the Senate 

amendment to the House amendment to the Senate amendment thereto, and to consider in the House, without intervention of any point of order, a motion offered by the chair of 

the Committee on Appropriations or his designee that the 

House concur in the Senate amendment to the House amendment to the Senate amendment. The Senate amendment and 

the motion shall be considered as read. The motion shall be 

debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by the 

chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ap-
2 

•HRES 734 EH 

propriations. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the motion to adoption without intervening motion. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
§ 182.230 How and when must I identify workplaces? ( a ) You must identify all known workplaces under each agency award. A failure to do so is a violation of your drug-free workplace requirements. You may identify the workplaces— ( 1 ) To the agency official that is making the award, either at the time of application or upon award; or
( 2 ) In documents that you keep on file in your offices during the performance of the award, in which case you must make the information available for inspection upon request by agency officials or their designated representatives.
( b ) Your workplace identification for an award must include the actual address of buildings (or parts of buildings) or other sites where work under the award takes place. Categorical descriptions may be used (e.g., all vehicles of a mass transit authority or State highway department while in operation, State employees in each local unemployment office, performers in concert halls or radio studios).
( c ) If you identified workplaces to the agency awarding official at the time of application or award, as described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, and any workplace that you identified changes during the performance of the award, you must inform the agency awarding official.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 96-3809

___________

James Stickley, *

*

Plaintiff, *

*

Tony Clark, and every prisoner in *

Administrative Segregation and *

Punitive Isolation; Carl Dwayne *

Prince, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

Appellants, * Eastern District of Arkansas.

* [UNPUBLISHED]

v. *

*

Arkansas Board of Correction; *

Recreational Committee; Max Mobley, *

Assistant Director over Treatment *

Services, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: March 23, 1998

Filed: March 26, 1998

___________

Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit

Judges.

___________
The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the

1

Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the

Honorable Henry J. Jones, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District

of Arkansas.

-2-

PER CURIAM.

Tony Clark and Carl Prince, Arkansas inmates appeal the district court’s1

dismissal of their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. After a careful review of the record and the

parties’ submissions on appeal, we affirm for the reasons given by the district court.

See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

The judgment is affirmed.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7170 

To amend the Federal Power Act to require the consideration of invasive 

species when prescribing fishways, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 27, 2018 

Mr. GROTHMAN (for himself and Mr. POCAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Power Act to require the consideration 

of invasive species when prescribing fishways, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CONSIDERATION OF INVASIVE SPECIES. 

4 Section 18 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 811) 

5 is amended by inserting after ‘‘the Secretary of Com6 merce.’’ the following: ‘‘In prescribing a fishway, the Sec7 retary of Commerce or the Secretary of the Interior, as 

8 appropriate, shall consider the threat of invasive species.’’. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
§ 1.650 How must an accredited third-party certification body ensure its audit agents are competent and objective? ( a ) An accredited third-party certification body that uses audit agents to conduct food safety audits must ensure that each such audit agent meets the following requirements with respect to the scope of its accreditation under this subpart. If the accredited third-party certification body is an individual, that individual is also subject to the following requirements, as applicable: ( 1 ) Has relevant knowledge and experience that provides an adequate basis for the audit agent to evaluate compliance with applicable food safety requirements of the FD&C Act and FDA regulations and, for consultative audits, also includes conformance with applicable industry standards and practices;
( 2 ) Has been determined by the accredited third-party certification body, through observations of a representative sample of audits, to be competent to conduct food safety audits under this subpart relevant to the audits they will be assigned to perform;
( 3 ) Has completed annual food safety training that is relevant to activities conducted under this subpart;
( 4 ) Is in compliance with the conflict of interest requirements of § 1.657 and has no other conflicts of interest with the eligible entity to be audited that might impair the audit agent's objectivity; and
( 5 ) Agrees to notify its accredited third-party certification body immediately upon discovering, during a food safety audit, any condition that could cause or contribute to a serious risk to the public health.
( b ) In assigning an audit agent to conduct a food safety audit at a particular eligible entity, an accredited third-party certification body must determine that the audit agent is qualified to conduct such audit under the criteria established in paragraph (a) of this section and based on the scope and purpose of the audit and the type of facility, its process(es), and food.
( c ) An accredited third-party certification body cannot use an audit agent to conduct a regulatory audit at an eligible entity if such audit agent conducted a consultative audit or regulatory audit for the same eligible entity in the preceding 13 months, except that such limitation may be waived if the accredited third-party certification body demonstrates to FDA, under § 1.663, there is insufficient access to audit agents in the country or region where the eligible entity is located. If the accredited third-party certification body is an individual, that individual is also subject to such limitations.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23.2




INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Eagle Point Software Corporation
Dubuque, Iowa

We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Eagle Point Software
Corporation and Subsidiary (Company) as of June 30, 2000 and 1999, and for each
of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2000, and have issued our report
thereon dated August 1, 2000. Our audits also included the financial statement
schedule of the Company listed in Item 14. This financial statement schedule is
the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, such financial statement
schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as
a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth
therein.



Des Moines, Iowa
August 1, 2000
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual
Report of UMED Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, John Olynick,
President of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |      |                                                                                                                                                     
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (i)  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|
| | (ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| |  |                      |        |                   |  |  | 
| |  | -------------------- | ------ | ----------------- |  |  | 
| |  | /s/
    John Olynick |        |                   |  | 
| |  |                      | Name   | John
    Olynick  |  | 
| |  |                      | Title: | President         |  | 
| |  |                      | Date:  | July
    19, 2018 |  |
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10
- 14 - 00392
- CV WILLIAM M. WINDSOR , Appellant v. SEAN D. FLEMING , Appellee

From the 378 th District Court Ellis County, Texas Trial Court No. 88611

ORDER
Appellant is incarcerated. This is one of four interlocutory appeals in which appellant is acting as his own counsel. 1 He contends that due to his incarceration, he does not have adequate access to information and legal resources. He requests a stay in two of his appeals until he has adequate access to the information and legal resources needed to handle his appeals. By this order, we also address, on our own motion, the advisability

1 See 10

- 14

- 00355

- CV, Windsor v. Round ; 10

- 15

- 00069

- CV, Windsor v. McDougald ; 10

- 15

- 00092

- CV, Windsor v. Joeyisalittlekid, et. al

.Windsor v. Flemi ng Page 2

of a stay in the other two pending appeals in addition to the two in which motions were
filed. Appellant does not contend he is indigent or that he cannot hire counsel to represent him in this appeal. A stay of this appeal is granted in part. Appellant cannot, however, use his own incarceration as a means to indefinitely delay the disposition of this proceeding. This appeal is stayed for 35 days. During this time, appellant may deal with his incarceration or hire counsel to represent appellant in this appeal. This appeal will be reinstated automatically after the expiration of 35 days and will proceed under the timetable required in the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure and as sched uled by the Court, with or without retained counsel by appellant. After reinstatement, lack of access to the information and legal resources needed to handle his appeal will not be considered as grounds to further delay the timely disposition of this proc eeding. Moreover, appellant’s incarceration cannot be used as an excuse to delay this appeal any longer.
PER CURIAM Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Stay granted Order issued and filed April 2, 2015
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

PATRICIA KORRAPATI,

Respondent

v.

VAMSIMADHAV KORRAPATI,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 638 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 2nd day of April, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 4/14/2015 3:02:58 PM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
ICRAS 1472 1845

- 0108 v 2

– Affected Public

- Individuals 8 / 2 8 /2013

This request is for an extension of the current approval of the policies and procedures for determining satisfactory

academic progress (SAP) as required in Section 484 of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (HEA). These regulations identify th e policies and procedures to ensure that students are making satisfactory

academic progress in their program at a pace and a level to receive or continue to receive Title IV, HEA program funds. If there is lapse in progress, the policy must identify

how t he student will be notified and what steps are available to a student not making satisfactory academic progress toward the completion of their program, and under what conditions a student who is not making satisfactory academic progress may

continue to rec eive Title I V, HEA program funds. Section 668.34(c)

– Institutions that evaluate satisfactory academic progress at the end of each pay ment period. This section of the regulations identifies the process that is followed for institutions that evaluate a stu dent’s SAP at the end of a pay ment period. This section specifies that an institution’s policy

may provide for disbursement of Title IV aid to a student not meeting SAP under certain circumstances. This includes policies that automaticall y place a studen t who is not meeting SAP on “financial aid warning” a newl y defined term. # of Respondents # of Responses Hrs/Response Burden Hours Individuals not meeting SAP requirements 809,537 x 2= 1,619,074 X .17 275,243 Section 668.34(d)

– Inst itutions that evaluate satisfactory academic progress annually or less frequentl y than at the end of each pay ment period. This section of the regulations identifies the process that is followed for institutions that evaluate a student’s SAP on an annual ba sis. This section specifies that an institution’s policy may provide for disbursement of Title IV aid to a student not meeting SAP under certain circumstances. This includes policies that require a student to file an appeal and either having a determinat ion made b y t he school that the student should meet SAP standards after the subsequent pay

ment period or if the school develops, with the student, an academic plan which if successfull y completed will ensure the student meets the institution’s SAP standard s at a specific time. # of Respondents # of Responses Hrs/Response Burden Hours Individuals not meeting SAP requirements 662,348 662,348 X .17 112,599

TOTAL S Responses 2,281,422 Respondents 1,471,885 Burden Hours 387,842
§ 1.20 Presence of mandatory label information. In the regulations specified in § 1.1(c) of this chapter, the term *package* means any container or wrapping in which any food, drug, device, or cosmetic is enclosed for use in the delivery or display of such commodities to retail purchasers, but does not include: ( a ) Shipping containers or wrappings used solely for the transportation of any such commodity in bulk or in quantity to manufacturers, packers, processors, or wholesale or retail distributors;
( b ) Shipping containers or outer wrappings used by retailers to ship or deliver any such commodity to retail customers if such containers and wrappings bear no printed matter pertaining to any particular commodity; or
( c ) Containers subject to the provisions of the Act of August 3, 1912 (37 Stat. 250, as amended; 15 U.S.C. 231-233), the Act of March 4, 1915 (38 Stat. 1186, as amended; 15 U.S.C. 234-236), the Act of August 31, 1916 (39 Stat. 673, as amended; 15 U.S.C. 251-256), or the Act of May 21, 1928 (45 Stat. 635, as amended; 15 U.S.C. 257-257i).
( d ) Containers used for tray pack displays in retail establishments.
( e ) Transparent wrappers or containers which do not bear written, printed, or graphic matter obscuring the label information required by this part.
A requirement contained in this part that any word, statement, or other information appear on the label shall not be considered to be complied with unless such word, statement, or information also appears on the outer container or wrapper of the retail package of the article, or, as stated in paragraph (e) of this section, such information is easily legible by virtue of the transparency of the outer wrapper or container. Where a consumer commodity is marketed in a multiunit retail package bearing the mandatory label information as required by this part and the unit containers are not intended to be sold separately, the net weight placement requirement of § 101.7(f) applicable to such unit containers is waived if the units are in compliance with all the other requirements of this part. [42 FR 15553, Mar. 22, 1977, as amended at 75 FR 73953, Nov. 30, 2010; 78 FR 69543, Nov. 20, 2013; 81 FR 59131, Aug. 29, 2016]
§ 170.320 Federal financial assistance subject to the Transparency Act. *Federal financial assistance subject to the Transparency Act* means assistance that non-Federal entities described in § 170.105 receive or administer in the form of— ( a ) Grants;
( b ) Cooperative agreements (which does not include cooperative research and development agreements pursuant to the Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986, as amended (15 U.S.C. 3710a));
( c ) Loans;
( d ) Loan guarantees;
( e ) Subsidies;
( f ) Insurance;
( g ) Food commodities;
( h ) Direct appropriations;
( i ) Assessed and voluntary contributions; and
( j ) Other financial assistance transactions that authorize the non-Federal entities' expenditure of Federal funds.
( k ) Federal financial assistance subject to the Transparency Act, does not include— ( 1 ) Technical assistance, which provides services in lieu of money;
( 2 ) A transfer of title to federally-owned property provided in lieu of money, even if the award is called a grant;
( 3 ) Any classified award; or
( 4 ) Any award funded in whole or in part with Recovery funds, as defined in section 1512 of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Pub. L. 111-5).
[75 FR 55669, Sept. 14, 2010, as amended at 85 FR 49526, Aug. 13, 2020]
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 588 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Veterans Small Business Week. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 25, 2017 

Mr. FITZPATRICK (for himself, Mr. CHABOT, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mr. BACON, 

Ms. CLARKE of New York, Mr. NORMAN, Mr. EVANS, Mr. MARSHALL, 

Mrs. MURPHY of Florida, Mr. COMER, Mr. LAWSON of Florida, Mr. KING

of Iowa, Mr. SCHNEIDER, Mrs. RADEWAGEN, Ms. ADAMS, and Mr. 

KNIGHT) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Small Business 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Veterans Small 

Business Week. 

Whereas the Armed Forces of the United States train individuals with the skills, discipline, and leadership necessary to establish and operate a successful business; 

Whereas there are approximately 2,500,000 veteran-owned 

small businesses in the United States, employing more 

than 5,000,000 individuals; 

Whereas veteran-owned businesses make up nearly 10 percent of all businesses in the United States; 

Whereas veterans account for more than $1,100,000,000,000 

in business receipts every year; 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 588 IH 

Whereas veterans are 45 percent more likely to be self-employed than non-veterans; 

Whereas business ownership by women veterans has increased significantly, from 97,114 in 2007 to 383,302 in 

2012; 

Whereas the Small Business Administration serves more than 

200,000 veterans, service-disabled veterans, women veterans, and military spouses annually; 

Whereas the Small Business Administration will be hosting 

events honoring National Veterans Small Business Week 

from October 30 through November 3, 2017; 

Whereas the Congress and the Small Business Administration will be celebrating Veterans Small Business Week 

during the week of October 30 through November 3, 

2017; and 

Whereas the week of October 30 through November 3, 2017, 

would be an appropriate time to celebrate National Veterans Small Business Week: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives joins 

2 with the Small Business Administration in— 

3 (1) supporting the goals and ideals of National 

4 Veterans Small Business Week; 

5 (2) celebrating the millions of people in the 

6 United States, especially the veterans of the United 

7 States and the spouses of those veterans, who ben8 efit from the programs of the Small Business Ad9 ministration; and 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 588 IH 

1 (3) expressing appreciation for the continued 

2 service to the United States by the veterans of the 

3 United States through small business ownership and 

4 entrepreneurship. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS