alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

DRAFT AGENDA

FIFRA SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY PANEL (SAP)

OPEN MEETING

March 19 - 21, 2013

FIFRA SAP WEB SITE http://www.epa.gov/scipoly/sap/

OPP Docket Telephone: (703) 305-5805

Docket Number: EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0574

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Conference Center - Lobby Level

One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.)

2777 S. Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA 22202

Draft Product Performance Data Needs Assessment for Products Claiming 

Efficacy Against Invertebrate Pests

Please note that all times are approximate (see note at end of Agenda).

Day 1

Tuesday, March 19, 2013

8:30 a.m. Opening of Meeting and Administrative Procedures – Joseph Bailey, Designated 

Federal Official, Office of Science Coordination and Policy, EPA

8:35 a.m. Welcome and Introduction of Panel Members – Daniel Schlenk, Ph.D., FIFRA SAP

Chair

8:40 a.m. Opening Remarks – Steven Bradbury, Ph.D., Director - Office of Pesticide Programs

(OPP), EPA

8:50 a.m. Overview of Topic - Lois Rossi, Division Director, Registration Division (RD), OPP, EPA

9:10 a.m. EPA Presentations – Kevin Sweeney, MS - RD, OPP, EPA

10:15 a.m. Break

10:30 a.m. EPA Presentations – Kevin Sweeney, MS - RD, OPP, EPA

12:30 a.m. Lunch

1:30 p.m. Public Comments

3:30 p.m. Break

3:45 p.m. Charge to Panel

5:00 p.m. Meeting Adjourns
2

Day 2

Wednesday, March 20, 2013

8:30 a.m. Opening of Meeting and Administrative Procedures – Joseph Bailey, Designated 

Federal Official, Office of Science Coordination and Policy, EPA

8:35 a.m. Introduction of Panel Members – Daniel Schlenk, Ph.D., FIFRA Scientific Advisory 

Panel Chair

8:40 a.m. Follow-up from Previous Day Discussions

9:00 a.m. Charge to Panel

10:15 a.m. Break

10:30 a.m. Charge to Panel

12:00 p.m. Lunch

1:00 p.m. Charge to Panel

3:00 p.m. Break

3:15 p.m. Charge to Panel

5:00 p.m. Meeting Adjourns

Day 3

Thursday, March 21, 2013

8:30 a.m. Opening of Meeting and Administrative Procedures – Joseph Bailey, Designated 

Federal Official, Office of Science Coordination and Policy, EPA

8:35 a.m. Introduction of Panel Members – Daniel Schlenk, Ph.D., FIFRA Scientific Advisory 

Panel Chair

8:40 a.m. Follow-up from Previous Day Discussions

9:00 a.m. Charge to Panel

10:15 a.m. Break

10:30 a.m. Charge to Panel

12:00 p.m. Lunch

1:00 p.m. Charge to Panel

3:00 p.m. Break

3:15 p.m. Charge to Panel

5:00 p.m. Meeting Adjourns

Please be advised that agenda times are approximate; when the discussion for one topic is 

completed, discussions for the next topic will begin. For further information, please contact the 

Designated Federal Official for this meeting, Joseph Bailey, via telephone: (202) 564-2045; fax: (202) 

564-8382; or email: bailey.joseph@epa.gov
****Thwarting       the SARS Virus**Mouse       immune system develops antibodies that single-handedly neutralize SARSUnderstanding       the SARS virusSARS       vaccine research well underway**
H. Res. 174 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

March 8, 2017. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 1301) 

making appropriations for the Department of Defense for the 

fiscal year ending September 30, 2017, and for other purposes. All points of order against consideration of the bill are 

waived. The bill shall be considered as read. All points of 

order against provisions in the bill are waived. The previous 

question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and on any 

amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the 

Committee on Appropriations; and (2) one motion to recommit. 

SEC. 2. The chair of the Committee on Appropriations 

may insert in the Congressional Record not later than 
2 

•HRES 174 EH 

Wednesday, March 8, 2017, such material as he may deem 

explanatory of H.R. 1301. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed May 17, 2023.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D23-22

Lower Tribunal No. F09-25236

________________

Barton Hill,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from 

the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Marisa Tinkler Mendez, Judge.

Barton Hill, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Katryna Santa Cruz, Assistant 

Attorney General, for appellee.

Before HENDON, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
§ 1400.600 How does a DOI suspension or debarment action begin? ( a ) Federal officials, DOI award officials, employees, or other sources will forward information indicating the potential existence of a cause for suspension or debarment, as listed in 2 CFR 180.700 and 180.800, to: ( 1 ) The DOI Office of Inspector General Administrative Remedies Division (OIG ARD); or
( 2 ) The Suspending and Debarring Official.
( b ) If forwarded to the OIG ARD, that office will conduct a review to determine if a recommendation for administrative action is warranted. If warranted, the OIG ARD will prepare and submit to the Suspending and Debarring Official an Action Referral Memorandum (ARM) with supporting documentation for the administrative record.
( c ) OIG ARD will also identify potential matters for case development and conduct a review to determine if a recommendation for administrative action is warranted. If warranted, the OIG ARD will prepare and submit to the Suspending and Debarring Official an ARM with supporting documentation for the administrative record.
( d ) The Suspending and Debarring Official will review the ARM to determine the adequacy of evidence to support and initiate: ( 1 ) A suspension by taking the actions listed in 2 CFR 180.615 and 180.715; or
( 2 ) A debarment by taking the actions listed in 2 CFR 180.615 and 2 CFR 180.805; and
( 3 ) Notification of the respondent on how the respondent may contest the action.
2007-1628.

#### DiCenzo v. A-Best Prods. Co., Inc.

Cuyahoga App. No. 88583, 2007-0hio-3270. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. II.

Lundberg Stratton and Cupp, JJ., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I.

Pfeifer, J., dissents.

Motion for admission pro hac vice of Joni M. Mangino by Bruce P. Mandel granted.

Motions for admission pro hac vice of Mark A. Behrens and Cary Silverman by Victor E. Schwartz granted.

Motions for admission pro hac vice of Diana Nickerson Jacobs, Mark C. Meyer, David B. Rodes, and Jason T. Shipp by Joseph J. Cirilano granted.
# m8692.docx

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 23.1.2018 C(2018) 514 final To the Notifying Party Subject : Case M. 8692 – SAICA / EMIN LEYDIER Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1 )( b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 1 and Article 57 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area 2 Dear Sir or Madam, 1. On 20 December 2 017 , the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which the undertaking S.A. Industrias Celulosa Aragonesa (Spain) , belonging to the group Saica ( " SAICA " , Spain ) , acquire s within the meaning of Article 3(1 )( b) of the Merger Regulation control over the whole of the undertaking Emin Leydier S.A. ( " Emin Leydier " , France) , by way of purchase of shares . 3 2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are: - for SAICA : collection and supply of recovered paper, manufacturing of corrugated case material, manufacturing of recycled corrugated packaging and flexible packaging. SAICA is owned by Aragocias , a Spanish holding company, and operates in Spain, France, Italy, Portugal, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Turkey, Luxembourg and the Netherlands; - for Emin Leydier : manufacturing of recycled corrugated case material and corrugated packaging solutions. Emin Leydier is mainly active in France, but also throughout the EEA. 3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5 ( c ) and 6 of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 . 4 4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1 )( b) of the Merger Regulation and Article 57 of the EEA Agreement . For the Commission Signed Johannes LAITENBERGER Director - General
(1)
OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ( the ' Merger Regulation ' ). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( ' TFEU ' ) has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of ' Community ' by ' Union ' and ' common market ' by ' internal market ' . The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.
(2) OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3 ( the ' EEA Agreement ' ).
(3) Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 001 , 04 . 1 . 2018 , p. 11 .
(4)
OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5 .
# EUR-Lex - 31994D0267 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31994D0267

**94/267/Euratom: Commission Decision of 21 March 1994 concerning the conclusion of Protocol 2 to the Agreement among the European Atomic Energy Community, the Government of Japan, the Government of the Russian Federation, and the Government of the United States of America on cooperation in the engineering design activities for the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER), by the Commission for and on behalf of the Community **

*
Official Journal L 114 , 05/05/1994 P. 0025 - 0025 Finnish special edition: Chapter 11 Volume 30 P. 0004 Swedish special edition: Chapter 11 Volume 30 P. 0004 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 21 March 1994 concerning the conclusion of Protocol 2 to the Agreement among the European Atomic Energy Community, the Government of Japan, the Government of the Russian Federation, and the Government of the United States of America on cooperation in the engineering design activities for the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER), by the Commission for and on behalf of the Community (94/267/Euratom)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular the second paragraph of Article 101 thereof,

Whereas the Council, in its Decision of 21 March 1994 approved the conclusion of Protocol 2 to the Agreement among the European Atomic Energy Community, the Government of Japan, the Government of the Russian Federation, and the Government of the United States of America on cooperation in the engineering design activities for the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER),

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Protocol 2 to the Agreement among the European Atomic Energy Community, the Government of Japan, the Government of the Russian Federation, and the Government of the United States of America on cooperation in the engineering design activities for the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) is hereby concluded on behalf of the Community.

The text of Protocol 2, together with the negotiators' shared views, is appended to this Decision.

Article 2

The Member of the Commission responsible for science, research and development or his designated representative is authorized to sign Protocol 2 for the purpose of binding the European Atomic Energy Community.

Done at Brussels, 21 March 1994.

For the Commission

The President

Jacques DELORS
----

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlantis Business DevelopmentCorporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I Tim DeHerrera, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(3) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(4) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

By: 

***/s/ Tim DeHerrera   ***

Tim DeHerrera

Treasurer

Dated:    May 16, 2005

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           6,309
<SECURITIES>                                    32,926
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,814
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (615)
<INVENTORY>                                        632
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                61,724
<PP&E>                                          10,665
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,718)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  74,350
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,883
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            23
<OTHER-SE>                                      58,880
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    74,350
<SALES>                                         19,115
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,115
<CGS>                                            6,858
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,858
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,140
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 152
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,501
<INCOME-TAX>                                       518
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,983
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,983
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.12
        

</TABLE>
| **Scientific Investigations Map          2835** |
|-------------------------------------------------|

| Geologic map of the Peach Orchard Flat quadrangle, Carbon County, Wyoming, and descriptions of new stratigraphic units in the Upper Cretaceous Lance Formation and Paleocene Fort Union Formation, eastern Greater Green River Basin, Wyoming-Colorado |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

By J.G. Honey and R.D. Hettinger**Version 1.1**
*Published 2004*

In version 1.1 of this map, a correction is made regarding the location      of the Overland Member of the Fort Union Formation at its type locality.      The correct location of the top of the measured section is 600 ft from      the west line and 1,150 ft from the south line of sec. 34, T. 17 N., R.    92 W., Doty Mountain 7.5-minute quadrangle.
The text of this report is presented here in Portable Document Format.      The latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader® or similar software is      required to view it. If you wish to download the latest version of Acrobat      Reader® free of charge, click here. SIM 2835 PDF        file (8.24 MB)For printing and viewing
Text Only PDF file (85 KB)
(This version of the report is accessible as defined in Section 508.)Readme TXT file (3 KB) SIM 2835 MET file (19 KB)Metadata file
 
2835.zip (545 KB)ZIPPED archive of ArcInfo and ArcView files2835.tar.gz (546 KB)TARRED and GZIPPED archive of ArcInfo and ArcView filesbases.zip (1.38 MB)ZIPPED archive of base maps imagesbases.tar.gz (1.37 MB)TARRED and GZIPPED archive of base maps imagesAccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices
U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey      URL: https://pubsdata.usgs.gov/pubs/sim/2004/2835/Questions or Assistance: USGS Web ContactPage Last Modified: Thr Dec  1 17:03 EDT 2016
Diferencias Entre la Oficina de Su Proveedor y el Departamento de Emergencia

Proveedor de Cuidado Primario

Pagará su copago de cuidado primario si lo tiene. Esto puede 

costarle entre $0 y $50. 

Va cuando se siente enfermo y cuando se siente bien.

Llama antes de ir para hacer una cita.

Puede que tenga que esperar un breve tiempo a que se le llame 

después de llegar, pero, generalmente, se le recibirá más o menos a 

la hora que hizo la cita.

Generalmente verá al mismo proveedor cada vez.

Generalmente, su proveedor tendrá acceso a su ficha médica.

Su proveedor colabora con usted para monitorear sus condiciones 

crónicas, y ayuda a mejorar su salud general.

Su proveedor examinará otras áreas de su salud, no solo el 

problema que le haya llevado allí ese día.

Si necesita visitar a otros proveedores, su proveedor lo puede 

ayudar a hacer un plan, obtener sus medicamentos, y programar las 

visitas de seguimiento recomendadas o a encontrar especialistas.

Departamento de Emergencias

Es probable que pague un copago, co-seguro, y que tenga que 

satisfacer su deducible antes de que su plan médico pague sus 

costos, especialmente si no es una emergencia. Su copago puede ser 

de entre $50 y $150.

Debe ir solamente cuando está lesionado o muy enfermo.

Se presenta cuando lo necesita y espera hasta que puedan verlo.

Es posible que espere varias horas antes de que se le vea si no es 

una emergencia.

Verá al proveedor que esté trabajando ese día.

El proveedor que lo vea probablemente no tendrá acceso a sus 

fichas médicas.

Es posible que el proveedor no sepa qué condiciones crónicas 

tiene usted.

El proveedor examinará solamente el problema urgente para el 

que vino a tratarse, pero puede que no haga preguntas acerca de 

otras inquietudes.

Cuando acabe su visita, se le dará de alta con instrucciones 

para hacer sus citas de seguimiento con su proveedor de 

cuidado primario y/o su especialista. Puede que no haya apoyo de 

seguimiento.

En algunas áreas, puede que tenga que ir a un Centro de Cuidado de Urgencias. Si hay Cuidado de Urgencias disponible en su área, llame 

a su plan médico antes de ir a averiguar cuánto tendrá que pagar.

Para más información, visite go.cms.gov/c2c CMS Producto No. 11817-S 

Revisado en septiembre de 2016
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1153 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1153

Honoring Jacob Anthony deGrom, starting pitcher for the New York Mets, 
          for winning the 2018 National League Cy Young Award.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 16, 2018

Mr. King of New York (for himself, Mr. Suozzi, and Mr. Engel) submitted 
   the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                    Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Honoring Jacob Anthony deGrom, starting pitcher for the New York Mets, 
          for winning the 2018 National League Cy Young Award.

Whereas, during the 2018 Major League Baseball season, Jacob deGrom led the 
        National League with a 1.70 earned run average;
Whereas, during the 2018 Major League Baseball season, Jacob deGrom finished 
        second in strikeouts in the National League with 269 Ks;
Whereas, during the 2018 Major League Baseball season, Jacob deGrom finished 
        second in walks and hits per innings pitched (WHIP) in the National 
        League with a .91 WHIP; and
Whereas the Baseball Writers' Association of America saw fit to award Jacob 
        deGrom with the National League Cy Young Award for his dominant 2018 
        season: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) honors Jacob Anthony deGrom for being awarded the 
        National League Cy Young Award for the 2018 season; and
            (2) wishes Jacob deGrom continued success on and off the 
        baseball diamond.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                                  CERTIFICATION
                  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
              ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350,
                   CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of National Datacomputer, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 (the
"Form 10-QSB") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information
contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: August 22, 2005                /s/  John P. Ward
                                      ------------------------------------
                                      John P. Ward
                                      Chairman of the Board, President and
                                      Chief Executive Officer

Dated: August 22, 2005                /s/ Gerald S. Eilberg
                                      ------------------------------------
                                      Gerald S. Eilberg
                                      Senior Vice President of Finance and
                                      Administration and Chief Financial
                                      Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
| **Scientific Investigations Map2849** |
|---------------------------------------|

| Correlation of Middle Jurassic San Rafael Group and Related Rocks from Bridgeport to Ouray in Western Colorado |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

By Robert B. O'Sullivan**Version 1.0***Published 2004*The text of this report is presented here in Portable Document Format.      The latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader® or similar software is      required to view it. If you wish to download the latest version of Acrobat      Reader® free of charge, click here. SIM 2849 PDF        file (1.56 MB)For printing and viewing
Text Only PDF file (38 KB)
(This version of the report is accessible as defined in Section 508.)AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices
U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey      URL: https://pubsdata.usgs.gov/pubs/sim/2004/2849/Questions or Assistance: USGS Web ContactPage Last Modified: Thr Dec  1 17:04 EDT 2016