alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 1275

CYNTHIA B. WOODS , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. S.C. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES; MONA SECHREST; MARSHA BROWN; KIM BACKMAN; DR. PETE LIGGETT; CHRISTIAN L. SOURA , Defendants

- Appellees,
and
H OLLIE HOADWONIC , Defendant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Columbia

. Mary G. Lewis , District Judge. ( 3:18

- cv
- 00834

- MGL )

Submitted : June 18, 2020 Decided: June 22, 2020

Before FLOYD, THACKER, and RUSHING , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.2 Cynthia B. Woods, Appellant Pro Se. Fred Adam Williams, GIGNILLIAT, SAVITZ & BETTIS, Columbia, South Carolina, f or Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: Cynthia B. Woods appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant Defendants’ motion to dismiss Woods’ several employment

related claims. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s
brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because the informal brief does not challenge the bases for the district court’s dispositive holdings, Woods has forfeited appellate review of the court’s disposition. See Jackson v. Lightsey , 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.
AFFIRMED
#### § 2000.220 What contracts and subcontracts, in addition to those listed in 2 CFR 180.220, are covered transactions?

The NRC nonprocurement suspension and debarment requirements apply only to first-tier procurement contracts under a covered nonprocurement transaction.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

        
<S>                             <C>       
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                      4,662,570
<SECURITIES>                                8,001,236
<RECEIVABLES>                               1,600,282       
<ALLOWANCES>                                  161,545       
<INVENTORY>                                   137,071     
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           15,299,751         
<PP&E>                                     11,328,097         
<DEPRECIATION>                              4,280,020          
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             25,420,377         
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       4,690,578        
<BONDS>                                       320,201      
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       49,417
<OTHER-SE>                                 20,275,867     
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               25,420,377    
<SALES>                                    13,821,138        
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           13,821,138         
<CGS>                                       3,791,601
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               3,791,601        
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               73,565
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              6,467
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               899,350     
<INCOME-TAX>                                  246,613      
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           652,737
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  652,737      
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.14   
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.13  
         

</TABLE>
§ 1108.315 Project costs. *Project costs* means the total of: ( a ) Allowable costs incurred under an award by the recipient, including costs of any subawards and contracts under the award; and
( b ) Cost-sharing or matching contributions that are required under the award, which includes voluntary committed (but not voluntary uncommitted) contributions and the value of any third-party in-kind contributions.
#### PEOPLE ex rel. DAVISON, Respondent, v. WILLIAMS, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

July 31, 1914.)

Proceeding by the People of the State of New York, on the relation of Elbert T. Davison, against William Williams, as Commissioner of Water Supply, Gas, and Electricity, etc.

No opinion. Order affirmed,, with $10 costs and disbursements, on the opinion of Mr. Justice Kelly at Special Term, 147 N. Y. Supp. 1036.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7327

In Re: DEREK W. MARTIN,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-01-550; CA-02-1896-4-12)

Submitted: October 22, 2003 Decided: March 25, 2004

Before LUTTIG, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Derek W. Martin, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Derek W. Martin petitions for a writ of mandamus,

alleging the district court has unduly delayed in acting because it

has not entered a final order disposing of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255

(2000) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the

district court to act upon his § 2255 motion. Our review of the

record reveals that the district court has dismissed Martin’s

§ 2255 motion. Accordingly, although we grant Martin’s motion to

proceed in forma pauperis, we deny his mandamus petition as moot.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
#### ROOT v. PULITZER et al. (two cases).

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 19, 1914.)

Actions by W. Russell Root, individually, etc., against Walter Pulitzer and others.

No opinion. Motions granted, unless appellants comply with terms stated in orders. Orders filed.
§ 183.35 Definitions. Terms used in this part are defined as follows: *Contingency operation,* as defined in 10 U.S.C. 101a, means a military operation that— ( 1 ) Is designated by the Secretary of Defense as an operation in which members of the armed forces are or may become involved in military actions, operations, or hostilities against an enemy of the United States or against an opposing military force; or
( 2 ) Results in the call or order to, or retention on, active duty of members of the uniformed services under 10 U.S.C. 688, 12301a, 12302, 12304, 12304a, 12305, 12406 of 10 U.S.C. chapter 15, 14 U.S.C. 712 or any other provision of law during a war or during a national emergency declared by the President or Congress.
*Covered combatant command* means the following: ( 1 ) The United States Africa Command.
( 2 ) The United States Central Command.
( 3 ) The United States European Command.
( 4 ) The United States Pacific Command.
( 5 ) The United States Southern Command.
( 6 ) The United States Transportation Command.
*Covered grant or cooperative agreement* means a grant or cooperative agreement, as defined in 2 CFR 200.1 with an estimated value in excess of $50,000 that is performed outside the United States, including its possessions and territories, in support of a contingency operation in which members of the Armed Forces are actively engaged in hostilities. Except for U.S. Department of Defense grants and cooperative agreements that were awarded on or before December 19, 2017, that will be performed in the United States Central Command, where the estimated value is in excess of $100,000.
*Covered person or entity* means a person or entity that is actively opposing United States or coalition forces involved in a contingency operation in which members of the Armed Forces are actively engaged in hostilities.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                      14,606,946
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,087,413
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,443,082
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            20,399,593
<PP&E>                                     198,196,777
<DEPRECIATION>                              50,759,446
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             183,688,068
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      134,641,502
<BONDS>                                     92,869,298
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 22,364,815
<COMMON>                                        61,954
<OTHER-SE>                               (118,142,735)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               183,688,068
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            30,153,914
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               16,665,110
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,771,972
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,522,865
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,338,530
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,338,530
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,338,530
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.62)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.62)

        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 33.3B



|                            |  |  |  |                                                                                         
|--------------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO                        |  |  |  |                                                                                         
|ASSURANT
Specialty
Property |  |  |  | 260 Interstate North Circle, SE Atlanta, GA
30339-2210 T 770.763.1000 
www.assurant.corn

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH

§1122(d)(2)(vi), §1122(d)(4)(xi) and §1122(d)(4)(xii)

of REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

FOR THE REPORTING PERIOD

JANUARY 1, 2015 TO DECEMBER 31, 2015

American Security Insurance Company, Standard Guaranty Insurance Company and TrackSure Insurance Agency, Inc. (collectively, the Asserting Party)
is responsible for assessing compliance for the period of January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the Reporting Period) with the servicing criteria set forth in §1122(d)(2)(vi), §1122(d)(4)(xi) and
§1122(d)(4)(xii) of Title 17, §229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations, (the Applicable Servicing Criteria) which the Asserting Party has concluded are applicable to the insurance escrow servicing activities it performs
with respect to all mortgage backed securities transactions that were registered after January 1, 2006 with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 (the Platform Transactions). The Asserting
Party used the criteria set forth in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB to assess the compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the Asserting Party has
complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform Transactions.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Reporting Period,

American Security Insurance Company

Standard Guaranty Insurance Company

TrackSure
Insurance Agency, Inc.



|                                                                                              |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ John Frobose                                                                             
|By: John Frobose                                                                             
|President of American Security Insurance Company and Standard Guaranty Insurance Company, and
|Sr. Vice President of TrackSure Insurance Agency, Inc.                                       
|                                                                                             
|Date: February 8, 2016
Stoker and Cooper, 2007
# EUR-Lex - 31993R1793 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31993R1793

**Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1793/93 of 30 June 1993 regarding the operative event for the agricultural conversion rates used in the hops sector **

*
Official Journal L 163 , 06/07/1993 P. 0022 - 0022 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 50 P. 0228 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 50 P. 0228 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EEC) No 1793/93 of 30 June 1993 regarding the operative event for the agricultural conversion rates used in the hops sector

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 3813/92 of 28 December 1992 on the unit of account and the conversion rates to be applied for the purposes of the common agricultural policy (1), and in particular Article 6 (2) thereof,

Whereas the said introduced by Article 12 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1696/71 of 26 July 1971 on the common organization of the market in hops (2), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 3124/92 (3), may be granted in respect of hops products in the Community;

Whereas there is no marketing year for hops; whereas, therefore, a derogation should be provided from Article 11 (1) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1068/93 of 30 April 1993 on detailed rules for determining and applying the agricultural conversion rates (4);

Whereas Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2540/75 of 6 October 1975 defining the event in which the payment of aid to hop growers becomes due and payable (5) defines the operative event for the agricultural conversion rate to be used for the payment of the aid as the date of adoption by the Council of the Regulation fixing the amount of aid to growers in respect of the previous year's harvest; whereas the date of the operative event for the agricultural conversion rate applicable to the aid to hop growers should be 1 July of the year of entry into force of the Council Regulation fixing the amount of the aid; whereas, therefore, Regulation (EEC) No 2540/75 should be repealed;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Hops,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The agricultural conversion rate to be applied for the purposes of the aid provided for in Article 12 of Regulation (EEC) No 1696/71 shall be the rate in force on 1 July of the year in which the Regulation fixing the amount of the aid to growers enters into force.

Article 2

Regulation (EEC) No 2540/75 is hereby repealed.

Article 3

This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 June 1993.

For the Commission

René STEICHEN

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 387, 31. 12. 1992, p. 1.

(2) OJ No L 175, 4. 8. 1971, p. 1.

(3) OJ No L 313, 30. 10. 1992, p. 1.

(4) OJ No L 108, 1. 5. 1993, p. 106.

(5) OJ No L 259, 7. 10. 1975, p. 9.
#### § 5800.220 What contracts and subcontracts, in addition to those listed in 2 CFR 180.220, are covered transactions?

Pursuant to 2 CFR 180.220(c), the Commission extends coverage of nonprocurement suspension and debarment requirements beyond first-tier procurement contracts to include any subcontract to be funded by the Commission, the value of which is expected to equal to or exceed $25,000 or 30 percent of the value of first-tier transaction, whichever is lesser.
#### § 382.505 Who in HHS determines that a recipient who is an individual violated the requirements of this part?

The agency head is the official authorized to make the determination under 2 CFR 182.505.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 32 (Thursday, February 18, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7232-7233]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3302]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: United States Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

DATE AND TIME: Friday, February 26, 2010; 11 a.m. EST.

[[Page 7233]]


PLACE: Via Teleconference, Public Dial in: 1-800-597-7623, Conference 
ID <greek-i> 57721922.

MEETING OPEN TO PUBLIC: 

Meeting Agenda

    This meeting is open to the public, except where noted otherwise.

I. Approval of Agenda
II. Program Planning
    <bullet> Approval of Findings and Recommendations for The Impact of 
Illegal Immigration on the Wages and Employment Opportunities of Black 
Workers Report
    <bullet> Update on Status of 2010 Enforcement Report--Some of the 
discussion of this agenda item may be held in closed session.
    <bullet> Update on Status of Title IX Project--Some of the 
discussion of this agenda item may be held in closed session.
III. State Advisory Committee Issues
    <bullet> Pennsylvania SAC
    <bullet> Nevada SAC
    <bullet> Missouri SAC
IV. Adjourn

Contact Person for Further Information: Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting Chief, 
Public Affairs Unit, (202) 376-8591. TDD: (202) 376-8116.
    Persons with a disability requiring special services, such as an 
interpreter for the hearing impaired, should contact Pamela Dunston at 
least seven days prior to the meeting at 202-376-8105. TDD: (202) 376-
8116.

    Dated: February 16, 2010.
David Blackwood,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2010-3302 Filed 2-16-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
§ 904.14 Future regulations. ( a ) Western may from time to time promulgate such additional or amendatory regulations as deemed necessary for the administration of the Project in accordance with applicable law; *Provided,* That no right under any Contract shall be impaired or obligation thereunder be extended thereby.
( b ) Any modification, extension, or waiver of any provision of these General Regulations granted for the benefit of any one or more Contractors shall not be denied to any other Contractor.
( c ) Western reserves the right to terminate, modify, or extend these regulations, either partially or in their entirety, to the extent permitted by law or existing contract.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 7237]

# AGENCY:

Department of State.

# ACTION:

Notice of intent to establish an advisory committee.

The Secretary of State announces an intent to establish the International Council on Women's Business Leadership, in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act.

*Nature and Purpose:*                     The Council will provide advice and assistance in the formulation of U.S. policy, positions, proposals and strategies for multilateral and bilateral negotiations, business outreach and commercial diplomacy, particularly pertaining to the economic empowerment of women for global economic prosperity where the State Department has the lead negotiating authority. The objective of the Council is to bring to the United States Government a source of expertise, knowledge and insight not available within the Department or elsewhere in the government on these issues.                

*Other information:*                     It is anticipated that the Council will meet at least once a year and at such other times and places as are required to fulfill the objectives of the Council. The Department of State affirms that the advisory committee is necessary and in the public interest.                

*For further information, please contact:*                     Nancy Smith-Nissley at (202) 647-1682.                

Dated: December 20, 2010.

Lorraine Hariton

Special Representative, Office of Commercial & Business Affairs, U.S. Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 2010-32884 Filed 12-29-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-07-P
EX-35.5
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services

MAC R1204-010
9062 01d Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045

Tel: 410 884 2000
Fax: 410 715 2380


Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.
1585 Broadway
Attn: Mortgage Backed Securities
New York, New York 10036

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill
    Lynch Trust 2013-C8, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series
    2013-C8


Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of February 1, 2013 (the
"Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows
as of and for the year ending December 31, 2013 (the "Reporting Period"):

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its
    performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's
    supervision; and

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo
    has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
    respects throughout the Reporting Period.


March 10, 2014


/s/ Brian Smith
BRIAN SMITH
Vice President


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
#### LEPIDUS, Respondent, v. LINCH, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 12, 1914.)

Action by Benjamin Lepidus, an infant, etc., against George W. Linch, as receiver, etc.

C. E. Chalmers, of New York City, for appellant.

E. M. Hawkins, of New York City, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Order filed.