U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.
        Here's how you know
      Here's how you know**Official websites use .gov**
            
            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
      **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
            
            A **lock** (
            A locked padlock
            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. Menu

      
        close

            
            
                                              About NIJ
        
                    
  
          About NIJ
      
    
          The NIJ Director
          How NIJ Is Organized
          Mission and Guiding Principles
          Research and Development Process
          Strategic Framework
          Assessments of NIJ
          Annual Reports & Reports to Congress
          Staff Directory
          Funding & Awards
        
                    
  
          Funding & Awards
      
    
          Current Funding
          Forthcoming Funding
          Expired Funding
          Awards: Listing of Funded Projects
          Guidance for Applicants and Awardees
          Fellowship & Student Programs
          Travel Scholarships
          NIJ Challenge Program
          Library & Multimedia
        
                    
  
          Library & Multimedia
      
    
          NIJ Journal
          Podcasts
          Publications Listing
          Multimedia Listing
          Rated Practices on CrimeSolutions
          Rated Programs on CrimeSolutions
          Software & Databases
          Datasets
          Patents
          Topics
        
                    
  
          Topics
      
    
          Article Listing
          Corrections
          Courts
          Crime Prevention
          Crimes
          Drugs and Crime
          Equipment and Technology
          Forensic Sciences
          Youth Justice
          Justice System Reform
          Law Enforcement
          Tribal Crime and Justice
          Victims of Crime
          Events
        
                    
  
          Events
      
    
          NIJ 2024 Research Conference
          Scheduled Events
          On-Demand Events
          Research Meetings & Workshops
          NIJ-Hosted Online Training

                            
                                About
          Contact Us
          Subscribe
          Topics A-Z
                  Share
FacebookXLinkedInRedditPinterestEmail Home
                            Funding & Awards
 Human Factors in Forensic Sciences Expert Working Group Series
Note:
              This awardee has received supplemental funding. This award detail page includes information about both the original award and supplemental awards.
Award Information
Awardee
              National Institute of Standards and Technology
Award #
              DJO-NIJ-17-RO-0175-2
Funding Category
              Non-Competitive

Status
              Closed
Funding First Awarded
              2017
Total funding (to date)
              $684,600
Original Solicitation
              NIJ FY17 Non-solicited Applications
Description of original award (Fiscal Year 2017, $292,300)
In recent years, the accuracy of forensic sciences has been the subject of increased study, scrutiny, and commentary in the legal system and the forensic science literature. Human factors analysis can be used to advance our understanding of the true nature of errors in complex work settings. Research in this area has identified factors that contribute to inefficiencies and quantified the effects of human and organizational factors on performance of critical tasks. The forensic science community can benefit from the application of the substantial body of human factors work to reduce the likelihood and consequences of human error in the scientific interpretation of evidence.

To assist the forensic community in this effort, the National Institute of Justice (NIJ) and the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s Office of Law Enforcement Standards partnered to develop a series of expert panels to examine human factors in forensic analyses and develop practices to reduce the likelihood of error based on scientific research.

The inaugural publication in this working group series contained forward looking recommendations that lead to significant changes in the field of latent print examination.  This report documents the working group’s findings and recommendations, addressing issues ranging from the acquisition of impressions of friction ridge skin to courtroom testimony, from laboratory design and equipment to research into emerging methods for associating latent prints with exemplars. It provides a comprehensive discussion of how human factors relate to all aspects of latent print examinations including communicating conclusions to all relevant parties through reports and testimony. The report’s recommendations and process map have since been used as the basis for updated standards and best practices within the field. The process map in particular has been translated in four languages, incorporated in SWGFAST/OSAC documents, and used in agency training modules around the world including the FBI. The second working group focused on handwriting examination is nearing completion and its report has recommendations needed to address critical issues within the field.

This funding will establish new working groups in this groundbreaking series. The next two working groups will address DNA mixture interpretation and toolmark examination. Each discipline-specific working group will be comprised of experts from relevant forensic disciplines, statisticians, psychologists, researchers, and other scientific experts, in addition to representatives from the legal community, professional organizations and other identified stakeholder groups.

Project Objectives

Conduct a scientific assessment (as defined by OMB) of the effects of human factors on forensic analyses with the goal of recommending strategies and approaches to improve its practice and reduce the likelihood of errors.
	Review current practices, processes, and procedures to identify and document where uncertainty and/or variability in practice could occur. (Process Mapping)
	Evaluate new/emerging methodologies, technologies, and standards based on the ability to achieve expected outcomes; is it:
	Realistic: Can it be followed or achieved with existing resources?
		Reliable: Does its implementation consistently yield the same result (all factors being equal)?
		Valid: Is it based on scientific procedures or methodologies?
		Clear: Is it understood in the same way by everyone concerned and not subject to distortion or misinterpretation?
		Measurable: Can performance be assessed and quantified?Deliverables:

Process Maps – graphical representation of the steps involved in the examination and interpretation processes used to provide a common understanding of the entire process.
	4 full working group meetings to include workshops on statistics, DNA methods, and human factors.
	Draft report outline that covers human factors issues in the following areas of DNA mixture interpretation: management, work environment, reporting, testimony, QA/QC, evidence interpretation, use of technology, research, education, and training.
Supplemental Award 1 (Fiscal Year 2017, $392,300)
In recent years, the accuracy of forensic sciences has been the subject of increased study, scrutiny, and commentary in the legal system and the forensic science literature. Human factors analysis can be used to advance our understanding of the true nature of errors in complex work settings. Research in this area has identified factors that contribute to inefficiencies and quantified the effects of human and organizational factors on performance of critical tasks. The forensic science community can benefit from the application of the substantial body of human factors work to reduce the likelihood and consequences of human error in the scientific interpretation of evidence.

To assist the forensic community in this effort, the National Institute of Justice (NIJ) and the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s Office of Law Enforcement Standards partnered to develop a series of expert panels to examine human factors in forensic analyses and develop practices to reduce the likelihood of error based on scientific research.

The inaugural publication in this working group series contained forward looking recommendations that lead to significant changes in the field of latent print examination.  This report documents the working group’s findings and recommendations, addressing issues ranging from the acquisition of impressions of friction ridge skin to courtroom testimony, from laboratory design and equipment to research into emerging methods for associating latent prints with exemplars. It provides a comprehensive discussion of how human factors relate to all aspects of latent print examinations including communicating conclusions to all relevant parties through reports and testimony. The report’s recommendations and process map have since been used as the basis for updated standards and best practices within the field. The process map in particular has been translated in four languages, incorporated in SWGFAST/OSAC documents, and used in agency training modules around the world including the FBI. The second working group focused on handwriting examination is nearing completion and its report has recommendations needed to address critical issues within the field.

This funding will establish new working groups in this groundbreaking series. The next two working groups will address DNA mixture interpretation and toolmark examination. Each discipline-specific working group will be comprised of experts from relevant forensic disciplines, statisticians, psychologists, researchers, and other scientific experts, in addition to representatives from the legal community, professional organizations and other identified stakeholder groups.

Project Objectives

Conduct a scientific assessment (as defined by OMB) of the effects of human factors on forensic analyses with the goal of recommending strategies and approaches to improve its practice and reduce the likelihood of errors.
	Review current practices, processes, and procedures to identify and document where uncertainty and/or variability in practice could occur. (Process Mapping)
	Evaluate new/emerging methodologies, technologies, and standards based on the ability to achieve expected outcomes; is it:
	Realistic: Can it be followed or achieved with existing resources?
		Reliable: Does its implementation consistently yield the same result (all factors being equal)?
		Valid: Is it based on scientific procedures or methodologies?
		Clear: Is it understood in the same way by everyone concerned and not subject to distortion or misinterpretation?
		Measurable: Can performance be assessed and quantified?Deliverables:

Process Maps – graphical representation of the steps involved in the examination and interpretation processes used to provide a common understanding of the entire process.
	4 full working group meetings to include workshops on statistics, DNA methods, and human factors.
	Draft report outline that covers human factors issues in the following areas of DNA mixture interpretation: management, work environment, reporting, testimony, QA/QC, evidence interpretation, use of technology, research, education, and training.
  
Date Created: December 15, 2020
    
          Side navigation
  

        

  
  
              Current Funding
    
      
            
            
            
      Forthcoming Funding
    
      
            
            
            
      Expired Funding
    
      
            
            
            
      Awards: Listing of Funded Projects
    
      
            
            
            
      Guidance for Applicants and Awardees
    
      
            
            
            
      Fellowship & Student Programs
    
      
            
            
            
      Travel Scholarships
    
      
            
            
            
      NIJ Challenge ProgramSimilar Awards
        
                      Evaluating the reliability and accuracy of multiple geophysical methods in the search for clandestine graves
                  Use of MicroRNA Expression in DNA extracts to Predict Body Weight Class in Forensic Samples
                  Expanding and validating microbiome database for estimating the postmortem interval
 Top

      National Institute of Justice

        
        
                        About NIJ
                    About NIJ
      
    
                  How NIJ Is Organized
      
    
                  NIJ Director
      
    
                  Research Disclaimer
      
    
                  Funding & Awards
                    Funding & Awards Home
      
    
                  Awards Listing
      
    
                  Current Funding
      
    
                  Guidance for Applicants and Awardees
      
    
                  Resources
                    Events
      
    
                  Podcasts
      
    
                  Publications
      
    
                  Topics
      
    
                  Multimedia
      
    
                  Reuse Policy
      
    
                  Contacts
                    Contact NIJ
      
    
                  Staff Directory
      
    
                  Submit a FOIA Request
      
    
                  File a Civil Rights ComplaintFacebook
          
                      X
          
                      YouTube
  

      810 7th St. NW, Washington, D.C. 20531
      
              Secondary Footer link menu
            Accessibility
              Plain Language
              Privacy Policy
              Legal Policies and Disclaimer
              No FEAR Act
              Freedom of Information Act
              USA.gov
              Justice.gov