alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 1402.6 Real property.

*Real property* has the same meaning as set forth in 2 CFR 200.1, except that the definition in this section also applies to legal ownership interests in land such as easements.

[84 FR 45635, Aug. 30, 2019, as amended at 86 FR 57531, Oct. 18, 2021]
§ 182.650 Grant. Grant means an award of financial assistance that, consistent with 31 U.S.C. 6304, is used to enter into a relationship— ( a ) The principal purpose of which is to transfer a thing of value to the recipient to carry out a public purpose of support or stimulation authorized by a law of the United States, rather than to acquire property or services for the Federal Government's direct benefit or use; and
( b ) In which substantial involvement is not expected between the Federal agency and the recipient when carrying out the activity contemplated by the award.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 6, 2017

No. 04-16-00825-CV

IN RE Hattie POOLE

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

On December 22, 2016, Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and motion for 

emergency relief. The court has considered the petition for writ of mandamus and is of the 

opinion Relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of 

mandamus and motion for emergency relief are DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The 

court’s opinion will issue at a later date.

It is so ORDERED on January 6, 2017.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 6th day of January, 2017.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk

 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2014PC4118, styled In the Estate of Hattie Poole, an Incapacitated

Person, pending in the Probate Court No 2, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Tom Rickhoff presiding.
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 234 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the importance of effective education in civics and government in elementary and 

secondary schools throughout the Nation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 30, 2017 

Mr. WILSON of South Carolina submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the importance of effective education in civics and 

government in elementary and secondary schools 

throughout the Nation. 

Whereas research shows that too few people in the United 

States understand the basic principles and functions of 

our constitutional government as set forth in the founding documents of our Nation, the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution; and 

Whereas since the founding of public education, elementary 

and secondary school education programs have had the 

mission of preparing students who are committed to the 

values and principles of the United States to participate 

in our constitutional government: Now, therefore, be it 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 234 IH 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives encour2 ages— 

3 (1) elementary and secondary schools to pro4 mote competent and responsible civic participation in 

5 the American political system; 

6 (2) States and local governments to develop, 

7 implement, and strengthen programs and curriculum 

8 to teach civics, government, and American history at 

9 the elementary and secondary school levels; and 

10 (3) elementary and secondary schools to pro11 mote current event discussions, participate in sim12 ulations of the democratic process, and incorporate 

13 education in civics and government into the core cur14 riculums of math, science, and language arts. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
§ 1128.420 Prior approvals for construction activities. ( a ) *OMB guidance.* OMB guidance in 2 CFR 200.308(g)(1) through (4) addresses prior approval requirements for revisions of a recipient's budget and program plans under a construction grant or cooperative agreement or construction activities under an award that supports both construction and non-construction activities.
( b ) *DoD implementation of the guidance.* DoD implements the guidance in 2 CFR 200.308(g)(1) through (4) through terms and conditions of awards for construction. A DoD Component's general terms and conditions for construction awards may require additional prior approvals for budget and program revisions (*i.e.,* prior approvals other than those authorized by this subpart) only in accordance with the exceptions provisions of 2 CFR 1126.3.
( c ) *Award terms and conditions.* In a DoD Component's general terms and conditions for construction awards or awards supporting construction activities, the DoD Component: ( 1 ) Must include the wording that appendix D to this part provides for paragraph B.2 of FMS Article IV.
( 2 ) May reserve or remove the wording appendix D to this part provides for paragraph B.1 and Section C of FMS Article IV unless some awards using the general terms and conditions will also support non-construction activities (if the DoD Component elects to remove Section C, it should redesignate Section D in the article as Section C).
## SERVED: APRIL 23, 2015 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ·· ··

In The Matter Of: JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORPORATION Respondent 

### OFFICE OF HEARINGS
.·:;. ' WASHINGTON, DC
) 

### ) ) ) ) ) DocketNo. FAA-2014-0813
Case No. 2012EA150022



### ORDER CANCELLING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND MOTION CONFERENCE

On April 6, 2015, an OrderAccepting Late-Filed Proposed Briefing Schedule and Setting Motion Conference was filed ("April 6, 2015 Order"). On April 22, 2015 the parties filed a Notice ofSettlement, in whichthey asserted that they were in the "process offinalizing" a settlement. As a result, the Respondent, JetBlue Airways Corporation, would notbe pursuing a motion to dismiss. The parties also confirmed that they would advise this Courtwhen the settlement was finalized. Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.205, and having reviewed the case file, all pleadings and motions, all relevant caselaw, statutes, regulations, rules, and authority, and being fully**advised~** 

### IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The briefing schedule set by the April6, 2015 Order is cancelled. 2. The Motion Conference set on June 2, 2015 (11 :OOam -12:00pmET) is cancelled.

Attachment: Service ListSERVICE LIST- BY 

### U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing DocketClerk, AGC-430 WilburWright Building-Suite2W1000 1



### Mr. Christian Lewerenz 

### Complainant's Counsel Office ofRegional Counsel, Eastern:Region Federal Aviation Administration 1Aviation Plaza Jamaica, NY 11434 TEL: 718-553-3258 FAX: 718-995-5699 Mr. Steven Raffaele 

### Respondent's Counsel HOLLAND & 

### KNIGHT LLP 31 West 5211d 

### Street NewYork,NY 10019 TEL: 212-513-3200 FAX: 212-385-9010 Judge J.E. Sullivan 

### US. Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (£11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-6941 FAX: 202-366-7536 ONE COPY 

### DocketNo. FAA-2014-0813 (Civil Penalty Action)

1Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2WI000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 918 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 918

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         July 18, 2006.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order 
without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the joint 
resolution (H.J. Res. 88) proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the 
United States relating to marriage. The joint resolution shall be considered as 
read. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the joint 
resolution to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour and 
30 minutes of debate equally divided and controlled by the Majority Leader and 
the Minority Leader or their designees; and (2) one motion to recommit.
    Sec. 2. During consideration of H.J. Res. 88 pursuant to this resolution, 
notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the Chair may postpone 
further consideration of the joint resolution to a time designated by the 
Speaker.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 11
                                                                      ----------

                          COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE LOSS

                           National Datacomputer, Inc.
              Statement recomputation of net loss per common share



                                                          Six Months Ended
                                                    ---------------------------
                                                      June 30        June 30
                                                        2002           2001
                                                    ------------   ------------
Net loss, as reported                               $   (433,279)  $ (1,035,953)

Preferred stock preference items:

Interest on Series B, C, D and F convertible
  preferred stock                                   $   (133,500)  $   (136,125)
                                                    ------------   ------------

Total preferred stock preference item               $   (133,500)  $   (136,125)

Net loss attributable to common stockholders        $   (566,779)  $ (1,172,078)

Weighted average shares outstanding:

Shares attributable to common stock outstanding       12,052,877      7,853,567
                                                    ------------   ------------

Weighted average shares outstanding                   12,052,877      7,853,567
                                                    ============   ============

Net loss per share                                  $      (0.05)  $      (0.15)
                                                    ============   ============
§ 200.102 Exceptions. ( a ) With the exception of subpart F of this part, OMB may allow exceptions for classes of Federal awards or non-Federal entities subject to the requirements of this part when exceptions are not prohibited by statute. In the interest of maximum uniformity, exceptions from the requirements of this part will be permitted as described in this section.
( b ) Exceptions on a case-by-case basis for individual non-Federal entities may be authorized by the Federal awarding agency or cognizant agency for indirect costs, except where otherwise required by law or where OMB or other approval is expressly required by this part.
( c ) The Federal awarding agency may adjust requirements to a class of Federal awards or non-Federal entities when approved by OMB, or when required by Federal statutes or regulations, except for the requirements in subpart F of this part. A Federal awarding agency may apply less restrictive requirements when making fixed amount awards as defined in subpart A of this part, except for those requirements imposed by statute or in subpart F of this part.
( d ) Federal awarding agencies may request exceptions in support of innovative program designs that apply a risk-based, data-driven framework to alleviate select compliance requirements and hold recipients accountable for good performance. See also § 200.206.
[85 FR 49538, Aug. 13, 2020, as amended at 86 FR 10439, Feb. 22, 2021]
H. Res. 68

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

February 8, 2005.

Resolved, That the following Member be, and is hereby,

elected to the following standing committee of the House of

Representatives:

COMMITTEE ON THE BUDGET: Mr. Simpson to rank

after Mr. Ryan of Wisconsin.

Attest:

Clerk.
# EUR-Lex - 31991D0091 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31991D0091

**91/91/EEC: Commission Decision of 6 February 1991 on the areas referred to in Article 3 (2) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2506/88 instituting a Community programme to assist the conversion of shipbuilding areas (Renaval programme) (only the Spanish text is authentic) **

*
Official Journal L 050 , 23/02/1991 P. 0024 - 0024 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 6 February 1991 on the areas referred to in Article 3 (2) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2506/88 instituting a Community programme to assist the conversion of shipbuilding areas (Renaval programme) (Only the Spanish text is authentic) (91/91/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2506/88 of 6 July 1988 instituting a Community programme to assist the conversion of shipbuilding areas (Renaval programme) (1), and in particular Article 3 (2) thereof,

Whereas Article 3 (2) stipulates that the Community programme is to apply to the areas which satisfy the criteria laid down in Article 3 (1) (a) or (b);

Whereas the Member State concerned is required to propose the areas in which the Community programme can be applied; whereas the Kingdom of Spain submitted to the Commission a proposal concerning the provinces of La Coruña and Pontevedra in the Autonomous Community of Galicia and the province of Vizcaya in the Autonomous Community of the Basque Country;

Whereas these areas satisfy the criteria laid down,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION: Article 1

The provinces of La Coruña and Pontevedra in the Autonomous Community of Galicia and the province of Vizcaya in the Autonomous Community of the Basque Country satisfy the criteria laid down in Article 3 (1) (a) or (b) of Regulation (EEC) No 2506/88. The Community programme instituted by the said Regulation shall therefore be applicable to these areas. Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Spain. Done at Brussels, 6 February 1991. For the Commission

Bruce MILLAN

Member of the Commission (1) OJ No L 225, 15. 8. 1988, p. 24.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

January 4, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
132336 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 132336 COA: 270820 Oakland CC: 03-190746-FH GERALD WILLIAM MOLIK, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 6, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

p1218 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 4, 2007

Clerk
###### Editorial Note on Part 25

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 25 appear at 79 FR 75879, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 25.407 Recipient.

*Recipient,* for the purposes of this part, means a non-Federal entity or Federal agency that received a Federal award. This term also includes a non-Federal entity who administers Federal financial assistance awards on behalf of a Federal agency.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1





INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-
32708, 33-96916, and 333-32712 of Eagle Point Software Corporation on Form S-8
of our reports dated July 27, 2001 and October 12, 2001, as to Note 9 (which
expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating
to the restatement described in Note 9) appearing in this Annual Report on Form
10-K/A of Eagle Point Software Corporation for the year ended June 30, 2001.


Deloitte & Touche LLP

Des Moines, Iowa
October 17, 2001
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)





Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of National Datacomputer, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.





Dated: August 14, 2009
/s/  William BerensWilliam B. BerensPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDated: August 14, 2009
/s/ Bruna BucacciBruna BucacciChief Accounting Officer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 645 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 645

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      December 6, 2017.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 38) to amend title 18, United States Code, 
to provide a means by which nonresidents of a State whose residents may carry 
concealed firearms may also do so in the State. All points of order against 
consideration of the bill are waived. In lieu of the amendment in the nature of 
a substitute recommended by the Committee on the Judiciary now printed in the 
bill, an amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of the text of Rules 
Committee Print 115-45 shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, 
shall be considered as read. All points of order against provisions in the bill, 
as amended, are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on 
the bill, as amended, and on any further amendment thereto, to final passage 
without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and 
controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on the 
Judiciary; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

NOEL DEVON D. COWARD,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 370 EAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29th day of October, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
EFTPS EXPRESS ENROLLMENT

FOR NEW BUSINESSES

EFTPS (Electronic Federal Tax Payment System) is the fast, accurate, and secure

payment system provided FREE by the U.S. Department of Treasury for business and

individual taxpayers to pay federal taxes online or by phone.

Express Enrollment for New Businesses was developed to help new businesses use EFTPS as an efficient, cost saving

method of paying all federal taxes. Express Enrollment expedites the EFTPS enrollment process, giving you the ability to make

payments as soon as your enrollment is activated. Usually enrollment in EFTPS takes approximately two weeks to process after

receipt of your information. With Express Enrollment, you could be ready to make tax payments within a matter of minutes.

Beginning in January 2004, all businesses receiving a new EIN (Employer Identification Number) that have a federal tax

obligation will be automatically pre-enrolled in EFTPS to make all their Federal Tax Deposits.

When you receive your EIN, you will also receive a separate mailing containing an EFTPS PIN (Personal Identification

Number) and instructions for activating your enrollment.

You will activate your enrollment by calling an 800-number, entering your banking information and completing an

authorization for EFTPS to transfer funds from your account to Treasury’s account for tax payments per your instructions.

You will still have the option to order FTD coupons from the IRS, however you will need to allow 5-6 weeks for delivery.

Although EFTPS is available to both businesses and individuals, Express Enrollment is only for business

taxpayers requesting a new EIN who have indicated they will have federal tax obligations.

If you have any questions about EFTPS Express Enrollment for New Businesses, consult your tax

professional, or call EFTPS Customer Service (available 24/7): 1-800-555-4477 or 1-800-945-8400.

Additional information is also available online at www.eftps.gov and www.irs.gov

HERE’S HOW IT WORKS

BUSINESS TAXPAYERS ONLY

QUESTIONS?

Department of the Treasury

Internal Revenue Service

www.irs.gov

Publication 4277 (1-2004)

Catalog Number 37963Y

IRS
§ 1004.2 Plans for the repair of electronic products. Every plan for bringing an electronic product into conformity with applicable Federal standards or for remedying any defect in such product shall be submitted to the Secretary in writing, and in addition to other relevant information which the Secretary may require, shall include: ( a ) Identification of the product involved.
( b ) The approximate number of defective product units which have left the place of manufacture.
( c ) The specific modifications, alterations, changes, repairs, corrections, or adjustments to be made to bring the product into conformity or remedy any defect.
( d ) The manner in which the operations described in paragraph (c) will be accomplished, including the procedure for obtaining access to, or possession of, the products and the location where such operations will be performed.
( e ) The technical data, test results or studies demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed remedial action.
( f ) A time limit, reasonable in light of the circumstances, for completion of the operations.
( g ) The system by which the manufacturer will provide reimbursement for any transportation expenses incurred in connection with having such product brought into conformity or having any defect remedied.
( h ) The text of the statement which the manufacturer will send to the persons specified in § 1003.10(b) of this chapter informing such persons; ( 1 ) That the manufacturer, at his expense, will repair the electronic product involved,
( 2 ) Of the method by which the manufacturer will obtain access to or possession of the product to make such repairs,
( 3 ) That the manufacturer will reimburse such persons for any transportation expenses incurred in connection with making such repairs, and
( 4 ) Of the manner in which such reimbursement will be effected.
( i ) An assurance that the manufacturer will provide the Secretary with progress reports on the effectiveness of the plan, including the number of electronic products repaired.