alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 910.512 Report submission. ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) The audit must be completed and the reporting package described in paragraph (c) of this section must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period. If the due date falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday, the reporting package is due the next business day.
( 2 ) Unless restricted by Federal statutes or regulations, the auditee must make copies available for public inspection. Auditees and auditors must ensure that their respective parts of the reporting package do not include protected personally identifiable information.
( b ) *Data collection.* See paragraph (b)(1) of this section: ( 1 ) A senior level representative of the auditee (*e.g.,* director of finance, chief executive officer, or chief financial officer) must sign a statement to be included as part of the reporting package that says that the auditee complied with the requirements of this Part, the reporting package does not include protected personally identifiable information, and the information included in its entirety is accurate and complete.
( 2 ) Not applicable.
( 3 ) Not applicable.
( c ) *Reporting package.* The reporting package must include the: ( 1 ) Financial statements (if available) and schedule of expenditures of DOE awards discussed in § 910.510 Financial statements, paragraphs (a) and (b), respectively;
( 2 ) Summary schedule of prior audit findings discussed in § 910.511 Audit findings follow-up, paragraph (b);
( 3 ) Auditor's report(s) discussed in § 910.515 Audit reporting; and
( 4 ) Corrective action plan discussed in § 910.511 Audit findings follow-up, paragraph (c).
( d ) *Submission to DOE.* The auditee must electronically submit the compliance reporting package described in paragraph (c) of this section compliance audits must be submitted (along with audited financial statements if audited financial statements are available), to the appropriate DOE Contracting Officer as well as to the DOE Office of the Chief Financial Officer.
( e ) *Requests for management letters issued by the auditor.* In response to requests by a Federal agency, auditees must submit a copy of any management letters issued by the auditor.
( f ) *Report retention requirements.* Auditees must keep one copy of the reporting package described in paragraph (c) of this section on file for three years from the date of submission to DOE.
( g ) Not applicable.
( h ) Not applicable.
38497.

#### THE HITCHCOCK CORPORATION v. TURNER *et al.*

Decided September 27, 1960.

*Smith, Swift, Currie, McGhee & Hancock, Glover McGhee,*for plaintiff in error.

*Bagwell & Hames, James A. Bagwell,*contra.

Nichols, Judge.

1. A petition seeking to recover only punitive and exemplary damages is subject to general demurrer *(Beverly v. Observer Publishing Co.,*88 Ga. App. 490, 77 S. E. 2d 80; *Gartrell v. Afro-American Life Ins. Co.,*88 Ga. App. 806, 78 S. E. 2d 92), and the judgment of the trial court overruling the defendant’s general demurrer to the plaintiffs’ petition must be reversed since only punitive and exemplary damages were sought.

2. Where the judgment of the trial court overruling the defendant’s general demurrer to the plaintiffs’ petition is reversed the questions raised by the defendant’s special demurrers become nugatory. *DeWinne v. Waldrep,*101 Ga. App. 570 (114 S. E. 2d 455).

*Judgment reversed.*

*Felton, C. J., and Bell, J., concur.*
Editorial Note on Part 112
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 112 appear at 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 112.12 Are there any alternatives to the requirements established in this part? ( a ) You may establish alternatives to certain specific requirements of subpart E of this part, as specified in § 112.45(b), provided that you satisfy the requirements of paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section.
( b ) You may establish and use an alternative to any of the requirements specified in paragraph (a) of this section, provided you have adequate scientific data or information to support a conclusion that the alternative would provide the same level of public health protection as the applicable requirement established in this part, and would not increase the likelihood that your covered produce will be adulterated under section 402 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, in light of your covered produce, practices, and conditions.
( c ) Scientific data and information used to support an alternative to a requirement specified in paragraph (a) of this section may be developed by you, available in the scientific literature, or available to you through a third party. You must establish and maintain documentation of the scientific data and information on which you rely in accordance with the requirements of subpart O of this part. You are not required to notify or seek prior approval from FDA regarding your decision to establish or use an alternative under this section.
[80 FR 74547, Nov. 27, 2015, as amended at 89 FR 37515, May 6, 2024]
§ 1500.11 Use of the same architect or engineer during construction. ( a ) If the recipient is satisfied with the qualifications and performance of the architect or engineer who provided any or all of the facilities planning or design services for a waste-water treatment works project and wishes to retain that firm or individual during construction of the project, it may do so without further public notice and evaluation of qualifications, provided: ( 1 ) The recipient received a facilities planning (Step 1) or design grant (Step 2), and selected the architect or engineer in accordance with EPA's procurement regulations in effect when EPA awarded the grant; or
( 2 ) The award official approves noncompetitive procurement under 2 CFR 200.320(c)(4) for reasons other than simply using the same individual or firm that provided facilities planning or design services for the project; or
( 3 ) The recipient attests that: ( i ) The initial request for proposals clearly stated the possibility that the firm or individual selected could be awarded a contract for services during construction; and
( ii ) The firm or individual was selected for facilities planning or design services in accordance with procedures specified in this section.
( iii ) No employee, officer or agent of the recipient, any member of their immediate families, or their partners have financial or other interest in the firm selected for award; and
( iv ) None of the recipient's officers, employees or agents solicited or accepted gratuities, favors or anything of monetary value from contractors or other parties to contracts.
( b ) However, if the recipient uses the procedures in paragraph (a) of this section to retain an architect or engineer, any Step 3 contracts between the architect or engineer and the grantee must meet all other procurement provisions in 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327.
[79 FR 76050, Dec. 19, 2014. Redesignated at 85 FR 61573, Sept. 30, 2020, as amended at 87 FR 30397, May 19, 2022]
IV 

House Calendar No. 237 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 985 

[Report No. 109–689] 

Directing the Secretary of State to provide to the House of Representatives 

certain documents in the possession of the Secretary of State relating 

to the report submitted to the Committee on International Relations 

of the House of Representatives on July 28, 2006, pursuant to the 

Iran and Syria Nonproliferation Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 7, 2006 

Mr. BERMAN (for himself and Mr. DELAHUNT) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations 

SEPTEMBER 27, 2006 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Directing the Secretary of State to provide to the House 

of Representatives certain documents in the possession 

of the Secretary of State relating to the report submitted 

to the Committee on International Relations of the 

House of Representatives on July 28, 2006, pursuant 

to the Iran and Syria Nonproliferation Act. 

1 Resolved, That the Secretary of State is directed to 

2 provide to the House of Representatives, not later than 


pwalker on PRODPC60 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 985 RH 

1 14 days after the date of the adoption of this resolution, 

2 all documents (excluding those documents that reveal in3 telligence sources and methods) in the possession of the 

4 Secretary of State, including notes from meetings, memos, 

5 and electronic mail records, relating to the report sub6 mitted to the Committee on International Relations of the 

7 House of Representatives on July 28, 2006, pursuant to 

8 section 2 of the Iran and Syria Nonproliferation Act (Pub9 lic Law 106–178; 50 U.S.C. 1701 note), including— 

10 (1) any such document indicating the dates on 

11 which the draft report was circulated to and ap12 proved by various offices and bureaus of the Depart13 ment of State; 

14 (2) any such document relating to the date on 

15 which the report would be submitted to Congress; 

16 and 

17 (3) any such document relating to the briefing 

18 provided by Department of State officials to con19 gressional staff on July 26, 2006, regarding the con20 tents of the report. 


pwalker on PRODPC60 with BILLS

pwalker on PRODPC60 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 237 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 985 

[Report No. 109

–689] 

RESOLUTION 

Directing the Secretary of State to provide to the 

Iran and Syria Nonproliferation Act. resentatives on July 28, 2006, pursuant to the International Relations of the House of Repto the report submitted to the Committee on the possession of the Secretary of State relating House of Representatives certain documents in 

SEPTEMBER 27, 2006 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


pwalker on PRODPC60 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 791 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 791

Recognizing the establishment of Hunters for the Hungry programs across 
 the United States and the contributions of those programs' efforts to 
              decrease hunger and help feed those in need.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 2, 2006

 Mr. Gingrey (for himself and Mr. Bartlett of Maryland) submitted the 
     following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                              Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Recognizing the establishment of Hunters for the Hungry programs across 
 the United States and the contributions of those programs' efforts to 
              decrease hunger and help feed those in need.

Whereas Hunters for the Hungry programs are cooperative efforts among hunters, 
        sportsmen's associations, meat processors, State meat inspectors, and 
        hunger relief organizations to help feed those in need;
Whereas during the past three years Hunters for the Hungry programs have brought 
        hundreds of thousands of pounds of venison to homeless shelters, soup 
        kitchens, and food banks; and
Whereas each year donations have multiplied as Hunters for the Hungry programs 
        continue to feed those in need: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the cooperative efforts of hunters, 
        sportsmen's associations, meat processors, State meat 
        inspectors, and hunger relief organizations to establish 
        Hunters for the Hungry programs across the United States; and
            (2) recognizes the contributions of Hunters for the Hungry 
        programs to efforts to decrease hunger and help feed those in 
        need.
                                 <all>
```
§ 60.7 License not required for certain preliminary activities. The requirement for a license set forth in § 60.3(a) of this part is not applicable to the extent that DOE receives and possesses source, special nuclear, and byproduct material at a geologic repository: ( a ) For purposes of site characterization; or
( b ) For use, during site characterization or construction, as components of radiographic, radiation monitoring, or similar equipment or instrumentation.
38411.

#### EMPLOYERS MUTUAL LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF WISCONSIN *et al.*v. SMITH.

Carlisle, Judge.

Where upon the trial of a workmen’s compensation case it was admitted by the employer that the claimant suffered an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of his employment when he was struck on the head by a shovel which fell from a truck he was loading, or unloading, at the time; that a gash requiring four stitches was inflicted on the top of his head near the hairline; and, where the evidence showed that thereafter the claimant worked for the employer about two weeks when he was discharged and where the claimant testified at the time of the hearing that he was not able to work and had not been able to work since the time of his discharge, that he has weak, nervous shaky spells and his eyesight goes blurry and he can’t see a thing in the world when he gets hot or anything, and that this condition must have been caused by the blow on his head, because he didn’t have it before and had never had any trouble in his life before that time; and, where the expert medical evidence in the form of written reports by two doctors admitted *327in evidence by' agreement of the parties tended to show that the claimant was suffering from possible intervertebral disc damage in his cervical spine which might reasonably be related to previous trauma; and, where there was no evidence introduced in any way tending to show that the claimant had suffered any other injury either before or after the injury above referred to, the finding of the deputy director and award of compensation based thereon that the claimant is entitled to compensation at the rate of $30' per week, beginning on the date he was discharged by the employer and continuing for a period of 400 weeks, or until there is a change in condition, and that he is entitled to all reasonable and necessary medical expenses incurred by reason of the accident and injury was authorized by' the evidence, and the judge of the superior court did not err in affirming that award on appeal. *Employers Liability Assur. Corp. v. Yates,*64 Ga. App. 633 (13 S. E. 2d 718); *Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Nuckolls,*69 Ga. App. 649, 653 (2) (26 S. E. 2d 473).

Decided September 7, 1960.

*Lee B. Williams,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Stanley P. Herndon,*contra.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Gardner, P. J., Townsend and Frankum, JJ., concicr.*
§ 1309.23 Separate registration for separate locations. ( a ) A separate registration is required for each principal place of business at one general physical location where List I chemicals are manufactured, distributed, imported, or exported by a person.
( b ) The following locations shall be deemed to be places not subject to the registration requirement: ( 1 ) A warehouse where List I chemicals are stored by or on behalf of a registered person, unless such chemicals are distributed directly from such warehouse to locations other than the registered location from which the chemicals were originally delivered; and
( 2 ) An office used by agents of a registrant where sales of List I chemicals are solicited, made, or supervised but which neither contains such chemicals (other than chemicals for display purposes) nor serves as a distribution point for filling sales orders.
[60 FR 32454, June 22, 1995, as amended at 75 FR 4981, Feb. 1, 2010]
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 3 (Wednesday, January 5, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 594]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-33358]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Board of Governors; Sunshine Act Meeting

TIMES AND DATES: 4 p.m., Monday, January 10, 2011; and 9 a.m., Tuesday, 
January 11, 2011.

PLACE:  Long Beach, California, at the Renaissance Hotel, 111 East 
Ocean Boulevard.

STATUS:  (Closed).

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Monday, January 10, at 4 p.m. (Closed)

    1. Financial Matters.
    2. Pricing.
    3. Strategic Issues.
    4. Personnel Matters and Compensation Issues.
    5. Governors' Executive Session--Discussion of prior agenda items 
and Board Governance.

Tuesday, January 11, at 9 a.m. (Closed)

    1. Continuation of Monday's agenda.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  Julie S. Moore, Secretary of the 
Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 
20260-1000. Telephone (202) 268-4800.

Julie S. Moore,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-33358 Filed 1-3-11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Ivest Howlett, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Bronx County (John H. Wilson, J.), rendered October 24, 2014, convicting her, after a jury trial, of willful violation of health laws, and imposing sentence.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment of conviction (John H. Wilson, J.), rendered October 24, 2014, reversed, on the law, accusatory instrument dismissed and fine and surcharge, if paid, remitted.</p><p>Defendant was charged with wilful violation of health laws (<i>see</i> Public Health Law [PHL] ยง 12-b[2]) in connection with her failure to report an act of physical abuse, mistreatment or neglect (<i>see</i> PHL ยง 2803-d). The factual portion of the complaint alleged that on February 12, 2012, at 11:10 p.m., defendant, a nurse's aide at Split Rock Rehabilitation and Care Center, witnessed an incident where a nurse at the facility "pushed [a] resident up against the wall and punched the resident." The complaint further alleged that defendant "left [t]he [f]acility at the end of her shift without reporting the incident she had witnessed."</p><p>We agree with defendant that the accusatory instrument was facially insufficient, since it failed to set forth, prima facie, her commission of the charged offense, an essential element of which is proof that defendant failed to report the act of physical abuse, mistreatment or neglect "immediately by telephone and in writing within forty-eight hours to the [Department of Health]" (PHL 2803-d[3]). The underlying instrument not only failed to indicate the time and manner of reporting required under PHL ยง 2803-d, but was bereft of any evidentiary facts that defendant failed to report the incident to the Department of Health, let alone whether such report was timely. In such sparse and unelucidating form, the accusatory instrument "failed to supply defendant with sufficient notice of the charged crime to satisfy the demands of due process and double jeopardy" (<i>People v Dreyden</i>, 15 NY3d 100, 103 [2010]).</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: April 20, 2016<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

GERALD WILLIAMS,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 374 EAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 25th day of November, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED.
#### § 1.23 Procedures for requesting variations and exemptions from required label statements.

Section 403(e) of the act (in this part 1, the term *act* means the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) provides for the establishment by regulation of reasonable variations and exemptions for small packages from the required declaration of net quantity of contents. Section 403(i) of the act provides for the establishment by regulation of exemptions from the required declaration of ingredients where such declaration is impracticable, or results in deception or unfair competition. Section 502(b) of the act provides for the establishment by regulation of reasonable variations and exemptions for small packages from the required declaration of net quantity of contents. Section 602(b) of the act provides for the establishment by regulation of reasonable variations and exemptions for small packages from the required declaration of net quantity of contents. Section 5(b) of the Fair Packaging and Labeling Act provides for the establishment by regulation of exemptions from certain required declarations of net quantity of contents, identity of commodity, identity and location of manufacturer, packer, or distributor, and from declaration of net quantity of servings represented, based on a finding that full compliance with such required declarations is impracticable or not necessary for the adequate protection of consumers, and a further finding that the nature, form, or quantity of the packaged consumer commodity or other good and sufficient reasons justify such exemptions. The Commissioner, on his own initiative or on petition of an interested person, may propose a variation or exemption based upon any of the foregoing statutory provisions, including proposed findings if section 5(b) of the Fair Packaging and Labeling Act applies, pursuant to parts 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, and 19 of this chapter.
#### § 1312.26 Records required of exporter.

In addition to any other records required by this chapter, the exporter must keep a record of any serial numbers that might appear on packages of narcotic drugs in quantities of one ounce or more in such a manner as will identify the foreign consignee, along with an official record of the export permit, in accordance with part 1304 of this chapter.

[81 FR 97033, Dec. 30, 2016]
§ 1271.320 Complaint file. ( a ) *Procedures.* You must establish and maintain procedures for the review, evaluation, and documentation of complaints as defined in § 1271.3(aa), relating to core current good tissue practice (CGTP) requirements, and the investigation of complaints as appropriate.
( b ) *Complaint file.* You must maintain a record of complaints that you receive in a file designated for complaints. The complaint file must contain sufficient information about each complaint for proper review and evaluation of the complaint (including the distinct identification code of the HCT/P that is the subject of the complaint) and for determining whether the complaint is an isolated event or represents a trend. You must make the complaint file available for review and copying upon request from FDA.
( c ) *Review and evaluation of complaints.* You must review and evaluate each complaint relating to core CGTP requirements to determine if the complaint is related to an HCT/P deviation or to an adverse reaction, and to determine if a report under § 1271.350 or another applicable regulation is required. As soon as practical, you must review, evaluate, and investigate each complaint that represents an event required to be reported to FDA, as described in § 1271.350. You must review and evaluate a complaint relating to core CGTP requirements that does not represent an event required to be reported to determine whether an investigation is necessary; an investigation may include referring a copy of the complaint to another establishment that performed manufacturing steps pertinent to the complaint. When no investigation is made, you must maintain a record that includes the reason no investigation was made, and the name of the individual(s) responsible for the decision not to investigate.