alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 31992D0100 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31992D0100

**92/100/EEC: Commission Decision of 22 January 1992 amending Decision 87/131/EEC authorizing a method for grading pig carcases in the Netherlands (Only the Dutch text is authentic) **

*
Official Journal L 039 , 15/02/1992 P. 0044 - 0045 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 22 January 1992 amending Decision 87/131/EEC authorizing a method for grading pig carcases in the Netherlands (Only the Dutch text is authentic) (92/100/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 3220/84 of 13 November 1984 determining the Community scale for grading pig carcases (1), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 3577/90 (2), and in particular Article 5 (2) thereof,

Whereas the Commission, by Decision 87/131/EEC (3), as last amended by Decision 87/395/EEC (4), has autorized a method for grading pig carcases in the Netherlands;

Whereas the Government of the Netherlands has requested the Commission to authorize the application of a new formula for the calculation of the lean meat content of carcases in the framework of the grading method provided for in Decision 87/131/EEC;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Pigmeat,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The text of Article 1 (3) of Decision 87/131/EEC is replaced by the following text:

'3. The lean meat content of the carcase shall be calculated according to the following formula:

Y = p Y gilt +(1 p) Y castrate (%)

where:

Y = the estimated percentage of lean meat in the carcase, Y gilt = 61,38 0,74 X1 + 0,13 X2 (%), Y castrate = 59,35 0,67 X1 + 0,13 X2 (%),

where:

X1 = the thickness of backfat (including rind) in millimetres, measured at six centimetres off the midline of the split carcase, between the third and fourth last ribs,

X2 = the thickness of muscle in millimetres, measured at the same time and in the same place as X1.

p = 1/ (1 + exp ( i)),

where: i = 3,277 0,4580 X1 + 0,3038 X2

- 0,007777 (X1)2 0,001792 (X2)2

0,002557 X1 · X2

This formula shall be valid for carcases weighing between 50 and 120 kg.'

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of the Netherlands. Done at Brussels, 22 January 1992. For the Commission

Ray MAC SHARRY

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 301, 20. 11. 1984, p. 1. (2) OJ No L 353, 17. 12. 1990, p. 23. (3) OJ No L 51, 20. 2. 1987, p. 50. (4) OJ No L 208, 30. 7. 1987, p. 43.
#### § 200.108 Inquiries.

Inquiries concerning this part may be directed to the Office of Federal Financial Management Office of Management and Budget, in Washington, DC. Non-Federal entities' inquiries should be addressed to the Federal awarding agency, cognizant agency for indirect costs, cognizant or oversight agency for audit, or pass-through entity as appropriate.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 1 (Monday, January 3, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 25]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-33092]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Acquisition Regulations System

48 CFR Part 252


Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Technical 
Amendments

AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense 
(DoD).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: DoD is making technical amendments to the Defense Federal 
Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to correct the clause list 
and associated clause dates in the clause ``Contract Terms and 
Conditions Required to Implement Statutes or Executive Orders 
Applicable to Defense Acquisitions of Commercial Items.''

DATES: Effective Date: January 3, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Amy G. Williams, Defense 
Acquisition Regulations System, OUSD(AT&L)DPAP/DARS, Room 3B855, 3060 
Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3060. Telephone 703-602-0328; 
facsimile 703-602-0350.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DoD is making technical amendments to the 
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to add 
Alternate II in paragraph (b)(11)(iii) and to correct clause dates in 
paragraphs (b)(11) and (b)(14) of the clause at 252.212-7001, Contract 
Terms and Conditions Required to Implement Statutes or Executive Orders 
Applicable to Defense Acquisitions of Commercial Items. These errors 
occurred as a result of the final rule DFARS Case 2009-D012, published 
in the Federal Register on December 29, 2010.

List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 252

    Government procurement.

Clare M. Zebrowski,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
    Therefore, 48 CFR part 252 is amended as follows:

PART 252--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES

0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR part 252 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority:  41 U.S.C. 421 and 48 CFR chapter 1.

PART 252--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES

0
2. Amend section 252.212-7001 as follows:


252.212-7001  [Amended]

0
a. Revise the clause date in paragraph (b)(11)(i) by removing ``(DEC 
2010)'' and adding in its place ``(NOV 2009)'';
0
b. Revise the clause date in paragraph (b)(11)(ii) by removing ``(DEC 
2010)'' and adding in its place ``(SEP 2008)'';
0
c. Add paragraph (b)(11)(iii);
0
d. Revise the clause date in paragraph (b)(14)(i) by removing ``(JUL 
2009)'' and adding in its place ``(DEC 2010)''; and
0
e. Revise the clause date in paragraph (b)(14)(ii) by removing ``(DEC 
2010)'' and adding in its place ``(JUL 2009)'';
    The revision reads as follows:


252.212-7001  Contract Terms and Conditions Required to Implement 
Statutes or Executive Orders Applicable to Defense Acquisitions of 
Commercial Items.

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (11) * * *
    (iii) ---- Alternate II (DEC 2010) of 252.225-7001.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2010-33092 Filed 12-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 173 (Thursday, September 6, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 54903]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-22124]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Friday October 19, 2012.

PLACE: 1155 21st St. NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance and Enforcement Matters. In the 
event that the times or dates of these or any future meetings change, 
an announcement of the change, along with the new time and place of the 
meeting will be posted on the Commission's Web site at http://www.cftc.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-22124 Filed 9-4-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 249 (Wednesday, December 29, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 82146]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32860]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

December 22, 2010.
    The Department of the Treasury will submit the following public 
information collection requirements to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 on or 
after the date of publication of this notice. A copy of the submissions 
may be obtained by contacting the Treasury Department Office Clearance 
Officers listed. Comments regarding these information collections 
should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the Treasury PRA 
Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, 1750 Pennsylvania 
Avenue, NW., Suite 11010, Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before January 28, 
2011 to be assured of consideration.

Domestic Finance/Terrorism Risk Insurance Program (TRIP)

    OMB Number: 1505-0200.
    Type of Review: Extension without change of a currently approved 
collection.
    Title: Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Loss Reporting.
    Form: TRIP 01, TRIP 02B, TRIP 02C, TRIP 02A, TRIP 02.
    Abstract: Information collection made necessary by the Terrorism 
Risk Insurance Act of 2002, as amended by the Terrorism Risk Insurance 
Extension Act of 2005, the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program 
Reauthorization Act of 2007, and by Treasury implementing regulations 
to pay Federal share to commercial property and casualty insurers for 
terrorism losses.
    Respondents: Businesses or other for-profits; Individuals or 
Households.
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 4,200 hours.
    TRIP Clearance Officer: Sara Clary, TRIP, 1425 New York Ave., NW., 
Room 2101, Washington, DC 20220; (202) 622-7814.
    OMB Reviewer: Shagufta Ahmed, Office of Management and Budget, New 
Executive Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503; (202) 395-
7873.

Celina Elphage,
Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-32860 Filed 12-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-25-P
#### Sharon Orsi and Donna Orsi, a Minor, by Regina Orsi, Mother and Next Friend, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Frances P. Young, Defendant-Appellee.

Gen. No. 53,584. (Abstract of Decision.)

First District, First Division.

June 23, 1969.

Jones, Clark & Huszagh, of Chicago (Richard W. Huszagh, of counsel), for appellants;

no brief filed for appellee.

Opinion by JUSTICE BURMAN. Not to be published in full.
2007-1546.

#### In re Guardianship of Richardson.

Montgomery App. No. 22000, 172 Ohio App.3d 410, 2007-Ohio-3462. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. II.

Moyer, C.J., and Cupp, J., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I.

O’Donnell, J., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. I and III.

Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, and O’Connor, JJ., dissent.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

January 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

129190 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 129190 

 COA: 255941 

Wayne CC: 03-011281-01 

MARCUS JEROME MILLER,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 28, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, J., would hold this case in abeyance for Davis v Washington, cert gtd ___ 

US ___; 126 S Ct 547; 163 L Ed 2d 458; 74 USLW 3272; 2005 WL 1671669; 2005 US 

LEXIS 7859 (October 31, 2005). 

p0125 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 31, 2006 

Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1007 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1007

    To prevent a severe reduction in the Federal medical assistance 
        percentage determined for a State for fiscal year 2006.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 11, 2005

 Mr. Bingaman (for himself, Ms. Snowe, Mr. Rockefeller, Mrs. Hutchison, 
        Mr. Reid, and Mr. Jeffords) introduced the following bill; 
        which was read twice and referred to the Committee on FinanceYY

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To prevent a severe reduction in the Federal medical assistance 
        percentage determined for a State for fiscal year 2006.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicaid Formula Fairness Act of 
2005''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON SEVERE REDUCTION IN THE MEDICAID FMAP FOR FISCAL 
              YEAR 2006.

    (a) Limitation on Reduction.--In no case shall the FMAP for a State 
for fiscal year 2006 be less than the greater of the following:
            (1) Half percentage point decrease.--The FMAP determined 
        for the State for fiscal year 2005, decreased by 0.5 percentage 
        points.
            (2) Computation without retroactive application of 
        rebenchmarked per capita income.--The FMAP that would have been 
        determined for the State for fiscal year 2006 if the per capita 
        incomes for 2001 and 2002 that was used to determine the FMAP 
        for the State for fiscal year 2005 were used.
    (b) Scope of Application.--The FMAP applicable to a State for 
fiscal year 2006 after the application of subsection (a) shall apply 
only for purposes of titles XIX and XXI of the Social Security Act 
(including for purposes of making disproportionate share hospital 
payments described in section 1923 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1396r-4) and 
payments under such titles that are based on the enhanced FMAP 
described in section 2105(b) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1397ee(b))) and 
shall not apply with respect to payments under title IV of such Act (42 
U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
    (c) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) FMAP.--The term ``FMAP'' means the Federal medical 
        assistance percentage, as defined in section 1905(b) of the 
        Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396d(b)).
            (2) State.--The term ``State'' has the meaning given such 
        term for purposes of title XIX of the Social Security Act (42 
        U.S.C. 1396 et seq.).

SEC. 3. REPEAL.

    Effective as of October 1, 2006, section 2 is repealed and shall 
not apply to any fiscal year after fiscal year 2006.
                                 <all>
```
#### YOUNG, Appellant, v. WENZ et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 15, 1915.)

Action by Henry G. Young against Jacob Wenz and another.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
(logo) LNR

          Partners, LLC 

 

 

ANNUALSTATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE 

OF

LNR PARTNERS, LLC

 

 

The undersigned, Job Warshaw, being the President ofLNR Partners, LLC (the "Special Servicer"), as special servicer underthe applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement, hereby certifies, as of thedate hereof, on behalf of the Special Servicer, solely in his capacity as anauthorized officer of the Special Servicer and not in his individual capacity,as follows:

 

1.      A review of the activities performed bythe Special Servicer during theperiodcommencing on January 1, 2017 and ending on December 31, 2017 (the"Reporting Period"), and of the Special Servicer's performance underthe Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision;and

 

2.      To the best of my knowledge, based on suchreview and using the applicable servicing criteria under Item 1122 ofRegulation AB, the Special Servicerhasfulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable Pooling and ServicingAgreement in all material respects throughout the ReportingPeriod.

 

 

LNR PARTNERS, LLC,

a Florida limited liabilitycompany

 

 

By: /s/ Job Warshaw

Job Warshaw

President

 

Dated: February 20, 2018

 

 

 

1601 Washington Avenue ·Suite 700 · Miami Beach, Florida 33139-3164

Telephone: (305) 695-5600 · Fax: (305)695-5601
```

[House Report 106-801]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

                                                 House Calendar No. 271
106th Congress                                            Rept. 106-801
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                      Part 2

======================================================================

 
                          CONTEMPT OF CONGRESS

                                _______
                                

                October 26, 2000.--Ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

  Mr. Young of Alaska, from the Committee on Resources, submitted the 
                               following

                          SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT

                             together with

                            DISSENTING VIEWS

    [Report on the Refusals to Comply with Subpoenas Issued by the 
                        Committee on Resources]

    The reason for this supplemental report is to comply with 
clause 3(a)(1)(B) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives, requiring a report of a committee on a measure 
or matter shall be printed in a single volume that ``shall bear 
on its cover a recital that such supplemental, minority or 
additional views * * * are included as part of the report.''

                                  

```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Velocity
Portfolio Group, Inc. for the period ended June 30, 2009, I, James J.
Mastriani, Chief Financial Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1        Such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended June 30, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Velocity Portfolio Group, Inc.

|                         |     |                         | 
|------------------------ | --- | ----------------------- | 
|Dated: September 4, 2009 | /s/ | James J. Mastriani      | 
|                         |     |                        
|                         |     | James J. Mastriani      | 
|                         |     | Chief Financial Officer | 

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-1974

CORA HILL, Prophetess,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

and

WORLD DELIVERANCE HEALTH FOUNDATION, INCORPORATED; TREE OF LIFE MINISTRIES,

Plaintiffs,

versus

AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (AMA); AMERICAN

HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION (AHA); U.S. DEPARTMENT OF

HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, Office of AIDS

Research,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Paul Trevor Sharp, Magistrate

Judge. (CA-00-182-1)

Submitted: October 4, 2001 Decided: October 11, 2001

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
* The parties consented to the exercise of jurisdiction by a

magistrate judge.

2

Cora Hill, Appellant Pro Se. Brenda Straub McClearn, SHARPLESS &

STAVOLA, P.A., Greensboro, North Carolina; Robert Joseph Morris,

SMITH, ANDERSON, BLOUNT, DORSETT, MITCHELL & JERNIGAN, Raleigh,

North Carolina; John Warren Stone, Jr., Assistant United States

Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Cora Hill appeals the magistrate judge’s orders* granting the

Defendants’ motions to dismiss this action alleging that the Defendants “torted” the general public by leading it to believe that

there was no hope for those afflicted with HIV/AIDS. We have

reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s orders and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

magistrate judge. Hill v. American Med. Ass’n, No. CA-00-182-1

(M.D.N.C. Nov. 20, 2000 & June 12, 2001). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      The undersigned officer of Wellman, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies
that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2005 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification is
provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed to be a
part of the Report or "filed" for any purpose whatsoever.

Date: May 9, 2005

                                            /s/  Thomas M. Duff
                                            --------------------
                                            Chief Executive Officer