alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 31994D0280 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31994D0280

**94/280/EC: Commission Decision of 28 April 1994 amending Commission Decision 92/471/EEC concerning animal health conditions and veterinary certification for importation of bovine embryos from third countries (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal L 120 , 11/05/1994 P. 0052 - 0058 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 57 P. 0092 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 57 P. 0092 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 28 April 1994 amending Commission Decision 92/471/EEC concerning animal health conditions and veterinary certification for importation of bovine embryos from third countries (Text with EEA relevance) (94/280/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 89/556/EEC of 25 September 1989 on animal health conditions governing intra Community trade in and importation from third countries of embryos of domestic animals of the bovine species (1), as last amended by Directive 93/52/EEC (2), and in particular Article 9 thereof,

Whereas Directive 89/556/EEC excluded embryos derived by certain techniques from the scope of the said Directive;

Whereas, by Directive 93/52/EEC, the scope of Directive 89/556/EEC has been enlarged to include all bovine embryos except those derived by transfer of nuclei; whereas embryos which are to be subjected to techniques which involve the penetration of the zona pellucida and those derived by in vitro fertilization may be introduced into trade or be imported as long as they meet the requirements of Directive 89/556/EEC, with certain additional safeguards;

Whereas Commission Decision 94/113/EC (3) amends the Annexes to the Directive to lay down the necessary additional safeguards;

Whereas it is necessary to amend Commission Decision 92/471/EEC of 2 September 1992 concerning animal health conditions and veterinary certification for importation of bovine embryos from third countries (4) to take into account the additional safeguards;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Annexes to Decision 92/471/EEC are hereby replaced by the Annexes to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision shall apply from the thirtieth day following its notification.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 April 1994.

For the Commission

René STEICHEN

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 302, 19. 10. 1989, p. 1.

(2) OJ No L 175, 19. 7. 1993, p. 21.

(3) OJ No L 53, 24. 2. 1994, p. 23.

(4) OJ No L 270, 15. 9. 1992, p. 27.

ANNEX A

PART II List of countries approved to use the model animal health certificate at Part I of Annex A Austria

Bosnia-Herzegovina

Canada

Croatia

Czech Republic

Finland

Hungary

Israel

New Zealand

Norway

Poland

Romania

Slovak Republik

Slovenia

Sweden

Switzerland

United States of America

Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia

ANNEX B

PART II List of countries approved to use the model animal health certificate at Part I of Annex B Australia
Editorial Note on Part 9
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 9 appear at 82 FR 52825, Nov. 15, 2017.

§ 9.301 Social Security account numbers in documents sent by mail. ( a ) Social Security account numbers shall not be visible on the outside of any package sent by mail.
( b ) A document sent by mail may only include the Social Security account number of an individual if it is determined by the head of the agency that the inclusion of a Social Security account number is necessary.
( c ) The inclusion of a Social Security account number of an individual on a document sent by mail is necessary when— ( 1 ) Required by law; or
( 2 ) Necessary to identify a specific individual and no adequate substitute is available.
( d ) Social Security account numbers must be partially redacted in documents sent by mail whenever feasible.
§ 700.3 Applicability. ( a ) Subparts A through D of 2 CFR part 200 apply to for-profit entities. The Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) at 48 CFR part 30, Cost Accounting Standards, and Part 31, Contract Cost Principles and Procedures, takes precedence over the cost principles in Subpart E for Federal awards to for-profit entities.
( b ) Subpart E applies to foreign organizations and foreign public entities, except where the Federal awarding agency determines that the application of these subparts would be inconsistent with the international obligations of the United States or the statute or regulations of a foreign government.
§ 820.39 Motions. ( a ) *General.* All motions in an enforcement adjudication except those made orally, shall be in writing, state the grounds therefor with particularity, set forth the relief or order sought, and be accompanied by any affidavit, certificate, other evidence, or legal memorandum relied upon.
( b ) *Answer to motions.* Except as otherwise specified by a particular provision of this part or by the Presiding Officer, a party shall have the right to file a written answer to the motion of another party within 10 days after the filing of such motion. The answer shall be accompanied by any affidavit, certificate, other evidence, or legal memorandum relied upon. If no answer is filed within the designated period, the party may be deemed to have waived any objection to the granting of the motion. The Presiding Officer may set a shorter or longer time for an answer, or make such other orders concerning the disposition of motions as he deems appropriate.
( c ) *Decision.* The Presiding Officer shall rule on a motion as soon as practicable after the filing of the answer. The decision of the Presiding Officer on any motion shall not be subject to administrative appeal.
AFS-11-230-E April 14, 2011

Exemption No. 4296Q Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2001-8754

Mr. James A. Young Director of Operations Everts Air Fuel, Inc.

P.O. Box 60908 Fairbanks, AK 99706

Dear Mr. Young:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to amend Exemption No. 4296, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated March 18, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Adm inistration (FAA) on behalf of Everts Air Fuel, Inc. (Everts), for an amendment of Exemption No. 4296, as amended. That exemption from § 91.9(a) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows Everts to operate certain McDonnell Douglas DC-6 (DC-6) aircraft at a 5 percent increased zero fuel weight and landing weight for all-cargo aircraft to provide supplies to people in isolated villages in Alaska. The amendment you requested would allow an additional aircraft (N6586C) to be operated under this exemption.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested amendment would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Everts.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determ ined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 4296, as amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, your petition to have your exemption amended has been granted, subject to the conditions and limitations listed below.

Conditions and Limitations

1. This exemption applies to only the following DC-6 aircraft operated by Everts and included on its part 125 operations specifications: Registration Nos. N251CE, N400UA, N444CE, N451CE, N7780B, N7919C, N51599, N555SQ, N888DG, N747CE (previously Registration No. N233HP), and N6586C.

2. Each aircraft’s maximum zero fuel and landing weights must not exceed 87,460 pounds and 92,360 pounds, respectively.

3. In addition to the normal inspection program, Everts must inspect each aircraft in accordance with Douglas Reports LB-306-73, Special Inspection Procedures for Cargo Operation, as revised and approved by the FAA.

4. Everts must revise the FAA-approved airplane flight manual for each aircraft operated under this exemption to include the operating limitations and information needed for operation at the increased weights.

5. Everts must include a copy of this exemption in each FAA-approved airplane flight

manual.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision adds the additional aircraft and m aintains the termination date of Exemption No. 4296, as amended, to June 30, 2012, unless sooner superseded or rescinded

Sincerely,

/s/

John W. McGraw Acting Director, Flight Standards

Service
exv10w1



 






American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc.

Non-employee Director Compensation Summary



In July 2006, the Board of Directors of American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc. approved the
following revised compensation schedule for independent directors:




Annual Retainer



We pay our independent directors an annual retainer for serving on the Board and Committees as
follows:




	 	 	 	 	 
	Board member

	 	$	40,000	 
	Audit Committee chair

	 	$	20,000	 
	Audit Committee member

	 	$	10,000	 
	Compensation Committee chair

	 	$	10,000	 
	Compensation Committee member

	 	$	5,000	 
	Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee chair

	 	$	7,500	 
	Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee member

	 	$	2,500	 






Stock Options



Our current compensation program also provides for the grant of stock options to our independent
directors. In 2006, we granted each of our independent directors options to purchase 20,000 shares
of our common stock. For future fiscal years, each independent director who is reelected as a
director at the annual meeting of stockholders or continues to serve as a director after such
meeting will be granted an option to purchase a number of shares of our common stock, as determined
by the Board each year prior to the annual meeting for such year. The Board anticipates that value
(based on customary valuation methods) of future option grants will be approximately equal to the
value of the options to purchase a total of 20,000 shares granted to independent directors in 2006.
The options have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the shares on the date of
grant. The options vest over a three-year period from the date of grant, as long as the
non-employee director continues to serve on the board, and become immediately exercisable in full
upon a change in control. The options expire seven years from the date of grant.




Expenses



In addition, we reimburse our non-employee directors for reasonable travel, food, lodging and other
incidental expenses incurred in connection with attending meetings of the Board or Committees.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Be th Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein,

Justices 

# Order

May 29, 2015

150327

150396

SHERYL L. SPIGNER,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 150327

COA: 315616

Macomb CC: 2011

- 002037

- NO

YARMOUTH COMMONS ASSOCIATION and

KRAMER

- TRIAD MANAGEMENT GROUP,

LLC,

Third

- Party Plaintiffs,

Defendants,

and

W & D LANDSCAPING & SNOW

PLOWING, INC.,

Third

- Party Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________

SHERYL L. SPIGNER,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 150396

COA: 315616

Macomb CC: 2011

- 002037

- NO

YARMOUTH COMMONS ASSOCIATION and

KRAMER

- TRIAD MANAGEMENT GROUP,

LLC,

Third

- Party Plaintiffs,

Defendants

- Appellants,

and

W & D LANDSCAPING & SNOW

PLOWING, INC.,

Third

- Party Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 29, 2015

t0526 2

Clerk On order of the Court, the applications for leave to appeal the September 30, 2014

judgment of the Court of Appeals are considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral

argument on whether to grant the applications or take other action. MCR 7.302(H)(1).

The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days o f the date of this order

addressing whether the Court of Appeals erred in interpreting Hoffner v Lanctoe , 492

Mich 450 (2012), when it held that the open and obvious doctrine does not preclude the

plaintiff’s premises liability claim. The parties should n ot submit mere restatements of

their application papers.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                            7504
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     3749
<ALLOWANCES>                                       264
<INVENTORY>                                       1784
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 12773
<PP&E>                                           15844
<DEPRECIATION>                                    4805
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   23812
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             4098
<BONDS>                                           6930
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             5
<OTHER-SE>                                       12779
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     23812
<SALES>                                           1138
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1990
<CGS>                                              844
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1917
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    99
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (870)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (870)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (870)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 249 (Wednesday, December 29, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 81853-81854]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32706]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Bureau of Prisons

28 CFR Part 541

[Docket No. BOP-1118-F]
RIN 1120-AB18


Inmate Discipline Program/Special Housing Units: Subpart Revision 
and Clarification

AGENCY: Bureau of Prisons, Justice.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Prisons (Bureau) is correcting a final rule that 
appeared in the Federal Register of December 8, 2010 (75 FR 76263). The 
document issued a final rule amending

[[Page 81854]]

the Bureau's Inmate Discipline Program and Special Housing Units (SHU) 
regulations. The Bureau issues this correction document in order to 
correct typographical and numbering errors. No substantive changes are 
being made to the final rule document.

DATES: This rule is effective on March 1, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Rules Unit, Office of General Counsel, Bureau of Prisons, 
320 First Street, NW., Washington, DC 20534.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sarah Qureshi, Office of General 
Counsel, Bureau of Prisons, phone (202) 307-2105.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Bureau corrects its Inmate Discipline 
and Special Housing Units (SHU) regulations (28 CFR part 541, subpart A 
and subpart B), as published in the Federal Register of December 8, 
2010 (75 FR 76263), FR Doc. 2010-30525, as follows:
    1. On page 76266, in the second column, second full paragraph 
beginning ``Code 331'', the reference to ``Sec.  541.03'' is corrected 
to read ``Sec.  541.3''.


Sec.  541.3  [Corrected]

    2. On page 76267, the title of Table 1, ``Table 1--Prohibited Acts 
and Available Sanctions Greatest Severity Level Prohibited Acts'' is 
corrected to read ``Table 1--Prohibited Acts and Available Sanctions''.
    3. On page 76267, in Table 1, between the line after the title of 
Table 1 and before the line beginning with ``100'', insert a new line 
with a subheading to read as follows: ``Greatest Severity Level 
Prohibited Acts''.


Sec.  541.7  [Corrected]

    4. On page 76272, in the first column, in Sec.  541.7(a)(4), 
``Sec.  541.04'' is corrected to read ``Sec.  541.4''.
    5. On page 76272, in the first column, in Sec.  541(g), ``Sec.  
541.08'' is corrected to read ``Sec.  541.8''.


Sec.  541.23  [Corrected]

    12. On page 76273, in the third column, in Sec.  541.23(c)(3), 
``You requested, or staff determined you need, administrative detention 
status for your own protection.'' Is corrected to read ``You requested, 
or staff determined you need, administrative detention status for your 
own protection; or''.

Harley G. Lappin,
Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons.
[FR Doc. 2010-32706 Filed 12-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
§ 910.368 Change of control. ( a ) Change of control is defined as any of the following: ( 1 ) Any event by which any individual or entity other than the recipient becomes the beneficial owner of more than 50% of the total voting power of the voting stock of the recipient;
( 2 ) The recipient merges with or into any entity other than in a transaction in which the shares of the recipient's voting stock are converted into a majority of the voting stock of the surviving entity;
( 3 ) The sale, lease or transfer of all or substantially all of the assets of the recipient to any individual or entity other than the recipient in one or a series of related transactions;
( 4 ) The adoption of a plan relating to the liquidation or dissolution of the recipient; or
( 5 ) Where the recipient is a wholly-owned subsidiary at the time of award or novation, and the recipient's parent entity undergoes a change of control as defined in this section.
( b ) When the Federal share of the financial assistance agreement is more than $10,000,000 or DOE requests the information in writing, the recipient must provide the contracting officer with documentation identifying all parties who exercise control in the recipient at the time of award.
( c ) When there is a change of control of a recipient, or the recipient has reason to know a change of control is likely, the recipient must notify the contracting officer within 30 days of its knowledge of such change of control. Such notification must include, at a minimum, copies of documents necessary to reflect the transaction that resulted or will result in the change of control, and identification of all entities, individuals or other parties to such transaction. Failure to notify the contracting officer of a change of control is grounds for suspension or termination of the award for failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the award.
( d ) The contracting officer must authorize a change of control for the purposes of the award. Failure to receive the contracting officer's authorization for a change of control may lead to a suspension of the award, termination for failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the award, or imposition of special award conditions pursuant to 2 CFR 910.372. Special award conditions may include but are not limited to: ( 1 ) Additional reporting requirements related to the change of control; and
( 2 ) Suspension of payments due to the recipient.
[80 FR 53239, Sept. 3, 2015]
#### § 1.383 What expedited procedures apply when FDA initiates a seizure action against a detained perishable food?

If FDA initiates a seizure action under section 304(a) of the act against a perishable food subject to a detention order under this subpart, FDA will send the seizure recommendation to the Department of Justice (DOJ) within 4 calendar days after the detention order is issued, unless extenuating circumstances exist. If the fourth calendar day is not a working day, FDA will advise the DOJ of its plans to recommend a seizure action on the last working day before the fourth calendar day and send the recommendation as soon as practicable on the first working day that follows. For purposes of this section, an extenuating circumstance includes, but is not limited to, instances when the results of confirmatory testing or other evidentiary development requires more than 4 calendar days to complete.
#### § 1.1365 When will FDA consider whether to adopt modified requirements or grant an exemption from the requirements of this subpart?

FDA will consider modifying the requirements of this subpart applicable to a food or type of entity, or exempting a food or type of entity from the requirements of this subpart, on our own initiative or in response to a citizen petition submitted under § 10.30 of this chapter by any interested party.