Appendix 7 Acute Impacts Refined Analysis FiguresRefined Acute Modeling Approach

Initial acute screening risk calculation s were performed with the HEM-3 model. HEM-3 estimates acute (1-hour) impacts at both polar and census block receptors. It is assumed for this short period of time that an exposed individual coul d be located at any off-site location. The lack of readily av ailable detailed property boundary information for many of the facilities evaluated made it difficult to determine whether receptors were

on- or off-site. In the absence of such info rmation, the first ring of polar receptors was placed 100 meters from the plant center for ma ny facilities. However, these polar rings

often transected on-site locati ons, restricting public access to exposures at these levels and thereby overestimating exposures.

The screening approach used by HEM-3 to estimate maximum 1-hour exposures also likely overestimates. To estimate ma ximum 1-hour concentrati ons at each receptor,

HEM-3 sums the maximum concentrations at tributed to each source, regardless of

whether those maximum concentrations occurr ed during the same hour. In other words, HEM-3 assumes that the maximum impact from each source at each receptor occurs at the same time. In actuality, maximum imp acts from different sources may occur at

different times.

This appendix includes the results of refined acute assessments performed for

facilities that exceeded short-term health benchmarks using the HEM-3 approach. The

refinements can address both areas of cons ervatism described above. The simplest refinement is to plot the HE M-3 polar grid results on aerial photographs of the facilities;

This allows the assessment of off-site loca tions that may be accessible to the public ( e.g., roadways and public buildings.). In cases wh ere this refinement results in lower acute risks no further refinement was conducted. However, if acute risk sti ll remain at or near

levels of concern a further refinement is conducted. This second refinement includes remodeling with the AERMOD model directly (instead of using HEM) to estimate maximum 1-hour concentrations at each recepto r by pairing individual source impacts in time and space. The AERMOD results are then plotted on aerial photographs as noted above to determine off-site impacts. Modeling with AERMOD also allows the estimation of the frequency of higher impacts at or above the health levels of concern. The attached figures present the estimated hazard quotient values (the modeled 1-hour concentration of a pollutant divided by its sh ort-term health benchmark) at the polar receptors near the facilities. Each set of figures is pref aced with a description of the maximum off-site hazard quotient va lue and where that value occurs.Printing and Publishing Facilities:(all HQs are for toluene)• Figure 1 – NEI10987; maximum offsite acute HQ of 3.65 to the eastof facility• Figure 2 – NEI11092; maximum offsite acute HQ of 10 to the northof facility• Figure 3 – NEI13250; maximum offsite acute HQ of 2.45 to the northof facility• Figure 4 – NEI25071; maximum offsite acute HQ of 3.04 to the northof facility• Figure 5 – NEI8115; maximum offsite acute HQ of 4.14 to thenortheast of facility• Figure 6 – NEI9433; maximum offsite acute HQ of 0.98 to thenorthwest of facility• Figure 7 – NEITNT$4767; maximum offsite acute HQ of 1.50 to thenorth of facilityFigure 1 – NEI10987 Acute Toluene HQ (REL)Figure 2 – NEI11092 Acute Toluene HQ (REL)Figure 3 – NEI13250 Acute Toluene HQ (REL)Figure 4 – NEI25071 Acute Toluene HQ (REL)Figure 5 – NEI8115 Acute Toluene HQ (REL)Figure 6 – NEI9433 Acute Toluene HQ (REL)Figure 7 – NEITNT$4767 Acute Toluene HQ (REL)

# Marine Tank Vessel Loading

Operations

• Figure 1 - NEI7687 ; maximum offsite acute HQ for glycol ethers of 0.6 to the 

# east of facility
• Figure 2 - NEITX20191; maximum offsite
acute HQ for benzene of 1.49 to the north of facility on a roadway

## Figure 1 – NEI7687 Acute Glycol Ethers HQ (REL)

## Figure 2 – NEITX20191 Acute Benzene HQ (REL)Pharmaceutical Facilities:• Figure 1 - NEI34261; maximum offsite acute HQ forchloroform of 2.18 to the west of facility• Figure 2 - NEI34769; maximum offsite acute HQ formethanol of 0.91 to the north of facility• Figure 3 - NEI46520; maximum offsite acute HQ formethylene chloride of 1.25 to the north of facility• Figure 4 - NEI46520; maximum offsite acute HQ foracetonitrile of 0.47 to the north of facility• Figure 5 - NEIIL0918580; maximum offsite acute HQ forglycol ethers of 1.93 to the southwest of facilityFigure 1 – NEI34261 Acute Chloroform HQ (REL)Figure 2 – NEI34769 Acute Methanol HQ (REL)Figure 3 – NEI46520 Acute Methylene Chloride HQ (REL)Figure 4 – NEI46520 Acute Acetonitrile HQ (AEGL-1)2.001.931.581.850.58Figure 5 – NEIIL0918580 Acute Glycol Ethers HQ (REL)Polybutadiene RubberProduction Facilities:• Figure 1 - NEI32876; maximum offsiteacute HQ for toluene of 1.40 to thesoutheast of facilityFigure 1 – NEI32876 Acute Toluene HQ (REL)Styrene Butadiene Rubber andLatex Production Facilities:• Figure 1 - NEI13230; maximum offsiteacute HQ for styrene of 0.35 to thesoutheast of facilityFigure 1 – NEI13230 Acute Styrene HQ (REL)