alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report
of UMED Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Ransom Jones, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



| |      |                                                                                                                                                     
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (i)  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|
| | (ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| |  |                 |        |                         |  |  | 
| |  | --------------- | ------ | ----------------------- |  |  | 
| |  | /s/Ransom Jones |       
| |  |                 | Name:  | Ransom Jones            |  | 
| |  |                 | Title: | Chief Financial Officer |  | 
| |  |                 | Date:  | July
    19, 2018       |  |
§ 76.10 Deliberate misconduct. ( a ) The Corporation or any employee of the Corporation and any contractor (including a supplier or consultant), subcontractor, or any employee of a contractor or subcontractor, who knowingly provides to the Corporation, or any contractor or subcontractor, components, equipment, materials, or other goods or services, that relate to the Corporation's activities subject to this part; may not: ( 1 ) Engage in deliberate misconduct that causes or, but for detection, would have caused, the Corporation to be in violation of any rule, regulation, or order, or any term, condition, or limitation of a certificate or approval issued by the Commission; or
( 2 ) Deliberately submit to the NRC, the Corporation, or its contractor or subcontractor, information that the person submitting the information knows to be incomplete or inaccurate in some respect material to the NRC.
( b ) A person who violates paragraph (a)(1) or (a)(2) of this section may be subject to enforcement action in accordance with the procedures in 10 CFR part 2, subpart B.
( c ) For purposes of paragraph (a)(1) of this section, deliberate misconduct by a person means an intentional act or omission that the person knows: ( 1 ) Would cause the Corporation to be in violation of any rule, regulation, or order, or any term, condition, or limitation of a certificate or approved compliance plan issued by the Director; or
( 2 ) Constitutes a violation of a requirement, procedure, instruction, contract, purchase order or policy of the Corporation, contractor, or subcontractor.
[59 FR 48960, Sept. 23, 1994, as amended at 62 FR 6669, Feb. 12, 1997]
§ 1400.751 What does the Suspending and Debarring Official consider in making a decision on whether to continue a suspension following notice issuance? ( a ) In the event a respondent does not contest the suspension in writing within the time period provided at 2 CFR 180.715 through 180.725, the suspension will remain in place without further proceedings.
( b ) Where a suspension is contested, the Suspending and Debarring Official follows the provisions at 2 CFR 180.730 through 180.755 in reaching a decision on whether to continue or terminate the suspension.
( c ) The contested suspension proceeding will include an oral Presentation of Matters in Opposition (PMIO), where one is requested by a respondent. The PMIO is conducted in an informal business meeting format and electronically recorded for inclusion in the administrative record.
( d ) Where fact-finding occurs as part of the suspension proceeding, after receiving the findings of fact and the hearing record from the fact-finding official, the Suspending and Debarring Official completes suspension proceedings, including a PMIO if one has been requested and did not occur before the fact-finding proceeding. Following completion of suspension proceedings, the Suspending and Debarring Official issues a written decision under the provisions of 2 CFR 180.750 and 180.755.
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Cheryl W. Farmer, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Greyhound Lines,Inc. and Subsidiaries; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: August 16, 2004                                                          /s/ Cheryl W. Farmer   Cheryl W. Farmer, Senior Vice President -    Finance
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 676 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 676

   Amending rule XXV of the Rules of the House of Representatives to 
 prohibit Members, officers, and employees of the House from accepting 
                    gifts from registered lobbyists.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 14, 2006

 Mr. Poe submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                           Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Amending rule XXV of the Rules of the House of Representatives to 
 prohibit Members, officers, and employees of the House from accepting 
                    gifts from registered lobbyists.

    Resolved, That clause 5(a)(1)(A) of rule XXV of the Rules of the 
House of Representatives is amended by adding at the end the following 
new sentence: ``Notwithstanding any other provision in this clause, in 
no event may a Member, Delegate, Resident Commissioner, officer, or 
employee accept a gift from a registered lobbyist.''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 1402.101 To whom does this part apply? ( a ) This part applies to all DOI grant-making activities and to any non-Federal entity that applies for, receives, operates, or expends funds from a DOI Federal award after October 29, 2019, unless otherwise authorized by Federal statute.
( b ) This part applies to foreign entity applicants and recipients, except where the DOI office or bureau determines that the application of this part would be inconsistent with the international obligations of the United States or the statutes or regulations of a foreign government (see § 1402.102). ( 1 ) Foreign entities are subject to the definitions and requirements in 2 CFR part 200, subparts A through E, and as supplemented by this part. In addition to the general requirements in 2 CFR part 200, foreign entities must follow the special considerations and requirements for different classes of recipients in subparts A through E as follows, unless otherwise instructed in this part: ( i ) Foreign public entities are to follow those for States, with the exception of the State payment procedures in 2 CFR 200.305(a). Foreign public entities must follow the payment procedures for non-Federal entities other than States;
( ii ) Foreign nonprofit organizations are to follow those for nonprofits; and
( iii ) Foreign higher education institutions are to follow those for Institutions of Higher Education (IHEs).
( 2 ) [Reserved]
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (i)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|   |
|   | (ii)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|   |   |           |   |                    |   |   |   |
|--------|--------|----------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|   |   | /s/RansomJones |   |
|   |   |           | Name:  | RansomJones             |   |   |
|   |   |           | Title: | Chief Financial Officer |   |   |
|   |   |           | Date:  | July19, 2018            |   |   |
|   |   |           |   |                    |   |   |
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MANUEL TORRES,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-12-00096-CR

Appeal from

County Criminal Court No. 4

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC # 20090C07495)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in the 

judgment. We therefore reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the cause for new 

trial, in accordance with the opinion of this Court, and that this decision be certified below for 

observation.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2014.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice 

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.

(Rivera, J., not participating)
§ 182.25 What must a Federal agency address in its implementation of the guidance? Each Federal agency's implementing regulation: ( a ) Must establish drug-free workplace policies and procedures for that agency's awards that are consistent with the guidance in this part. When adopted by a Federal agency, the provisions of the guidance have regulatory effect for that agency's awards.
( b ) Must address some matters for which the guidance in this part gives the agency discretion. Specifically, the regulation must— ( 1 ) State whether the agency: ( i ) Has a central point to which a recipient may send the notification of a conviction that is required under § 182.225(a) or § 182.300(b); or
( ii ) Requires the recipient to send the notification to the awarding official for each agency award, or to his or her official designee.
( 2 ) Either: ( i ) State that the agency head is the official authorized to determine under § 182.500 or § 182.505 that a recipient has violated the drug-free workplace requirements; or
( ii ) Provide the title of the official designated to make that determination.
( c ) May also, at the agency's option, identify any specific types of financial assistance awards, in addition to grants and cooperative agreements, to which the Federal agency makes this guidance applicable.
#### James CHANG, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, and United States Immigration and Naturalization Service, Respondents.

No. 81-1596.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

Submitted March 24, 1982.

Decided May 10, 1982.

Scott Kalish, San Juan, P. R., on brief, for petitioner.

*174Corneilus T. Cashman, Gen. Atty., Immigration and Naturalization Service, on brief, for respondent.

Before COFFIN, Chief Judge, CAMPBELL and BREYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

We conclude, in agreement with the decisions in *Wiggins v. United States Postal Service,*653 F.2d 219 (5th Cir. 1981) and *Christo v. Merit Systems Protection Board,*667 F.2d 882 (10th Cir. 1981), that mixed cases involving both claims of discrimination and of improper agency action must be brought as one action in the district court. Accordingly we lack jurisdiction over the petition and it is therefore dismissed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

YUXIA ZHANG, No. 83801 

Appellant, 

vs. FILED 

THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

Respondent. DEC 0 3 2021 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 

This is a pro se appeal challenging a district court order setting 

a briefing schedule and hearing. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark 

County; Cristina D. Silva, Judge. 

Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an 

order setting a briefing schedule and hearing in a criminal matter, we lack 

jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 

P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, we 

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 

"S1606.146%full'N. 

arraguirre 

Á4isai-.0 

Stiglich Silver 

cc: Hon. Cristina D. Silva, District Judge 

Yuxia Zhang 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

ELIZABETH 

CLEsšè SU 

BY 

BROWN 

E COURT
#### § 2700.30 What policies and procedures must I follow?

The SBA policies and procedures you must follow are the policies and procedures specified in each applicable section of the OMB guidance in subparts A through I of 2 CFR part 180, as that section is supplemented by the section in this part with the same section number. The contracts that are covered transactions, for example, are specified by section 220 of the OMB guidance (i.e., 2 CFR 180.220) as supplemented by section 220 of this part (i.e., § 2700.220). For any section of OMB guidance in subparts A through I of 2 CFR 180 that has no corresponding section in this part, SBA policies and procedures are those in the OMB guidance.
§ 960.5-2-2 Site ownership and control. ( a ) *Qualifying condition.* The site shall be located on land for which the DOE can obtain, in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 60.121, ownership, surface and subsurface rights, and control of access that are required in order that surface and subsurface activities during repository operation and closure will not be likely to lead to radionuclide releases to an unrestricted area greater than those allowable under the requirements specified in § 960.5-1(a)(1).
( b ) *Favorable condition.* Present ownership and control of land and all surface and subsurface mineral and water rights by the DOE.
( c ) *Potentially adverse condition.* Projected land-ownership conflicts that cannot be successfully resolved through voluntary purchase-sell agreements, nondisputed agency-to-agency transfers of title, or Federal condemnation proceedings.
#### § 601.1010 Suspending Official (Department of Energy supplement to government-wide definition at 2 CFR 180.1010).

The Debarring Official for the Department of State is the Procurement Executive, Office of the Procurement Executive (A/OPE).
**Exhibit 32.2**

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofCalgon Carbon Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for theperiod ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Leroy M. Ball, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of myknowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.

| /s/ Leroy M.   Ball       |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
|                           |   |
| Chief   Financial Officer |   |
| November 28,   2006       |   |

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

----
§ 901.20 Does this part apply to me? This part and, through this part, pertinent portions of the OMB guidance in subparts A through I of 2 CFR part 180 (see table at 2 CFR 180.100(b)) apply to you if you are a— ( a ) Participant or principal in a “covered transaction” (see subpart B of 2 CFR part 180 and the definition of “nonprocurement transaction” at 2 CFR 180.970);
( b ) Respondent in a DOE suspension or debarment action;
( c ) DOE debarment or suspension official; and
( d ) DOE grants officer, agreements officer, or other official authorized to enter into any type of nonprocurement transaction that is a covered transaction.
If you have diabetes, take care of your heart. Having diabetes means you are

more likely to have a heart attack or a stroke—but it doesn’t have to—if you

take care of your diabetes.

Over time, high blood glucose (sugar) can hurt organs in your body such as

your kidneys and your eyes. High blood pressure can make your heart work

too hard. And bad cholesterol, or LDL, builds up and clogs your heart and blood

vessels. 

Taking care of your blood glucose, blood pressure, and cholesterol means a

longer and healthier life.

ASK YOUR HEALTH CARE TEAM 

What are my blood glucose, blood pressure, and cholesterol numbers?

What should they be?

What actions can I take to reach my goals?

Use the Diabetes Record Form to write down the answers to these 

questions.

TAKE ACTION NOW

You can live longer, improve your health, and lower your risk of heart disease

or stroke.

Eat foods like fruits, vegetables, beans, and whole grains.

Eat foods made with less salt and fat.

Be active 30 minutes or more each day. 

Stay at a healthy weight—by being active and eating the right amounts of 

healthy foods.

Stop smoking—ask for help or call 1-800-QUITNOW (1-800-784-8669).

Take medicines the way your doctor tells you.

Ask your doctor about taking aspirin.

Ask for help if you feel down or have trouble with stress.

Ask your family and friends to help you take care of your heart and your

diabetes.

1

2

3

english · april 2010

x





P
DIABETES RECORD FORM

Goal

Take care of your heart by taking care of your blood glucose, 

blood pressure, and cholesterol.

Use this form to keep track of your blood glucose, blood pressure, and 

cholesterol. Work with your health care team, friends, and family to reach your

goals.

BLOOD GLUCOSE

The A1C test—short for hemoglobin A-1-C—is a simple blood test of 

your average blood over the last three months.

Goal for many people: Below 7 on the A1C test My target is:

Note: People who often have low blood glucose or who have had a heart attack or are at high

risk for a heart attack may need a higher A1C goal.

TEST AT LEAST TWICE A YEAR

Date Result 

Actions I can take

BLOOD PRESSURE

High blood pressure makes your heart work too hard. 

Goal for most people: Below 130/80 My target is:

CHECK AT EVERY VISIT 

Date Result 

Actions I can take

CHOLESTEROL

Bad cholesterol, or LDL, builds up and clogs your heart. 

Goal for people: LDL Below 100 My target is:

TEST AT LEAST ONCE A YEAR 

Date Result 

Actions I can take

The National Diabetes Education

Program is a joint program of the 

National Institutes of Health 

and the Centers for Disease

Control and Prevention.

www.YourDiabetesInfo.org

1-888-693-NDEP (1-888-693-6337)

TTY: 1-866-569-1162

nih publication no. 11-5058

ndep 52 en english · april 2010
2007-2013.

#### State ex rel. Turner v. Eberlin.

Belmont App. No. 07 BE 6, 2007-Ohio-5042. On motion to certify and maintain action as a class action. Motion denied.
#### Solack Estates, Inc., Appellant, v Mortimer Goodman, Respondent.

Order of the Appellate Term, entered October 16, 1979, affirming the judgment of the Civil Court, New York County, entered March 19, 1979, ordering vacatur of a warrant of eviction, setting aside a stipulation of settlement, and granting final judgment of possession in favor of the respondent, affirmed, without costs. The Civil Court was justified in vacating the stipulation of settlement in which the tenant acknowledged the legality of her eviction from certain premises and agreed to a full settlement of all her claims against the petitioner landlord and its agent in connection with the eviction in consideration of the payment of a certain sum of money. The day after the stipulation of settlement, tenant moved to vacate it by order to show cause. The following hearing, as well as the trial court’s observations of the tenant at the time of settlement, amply support the conclusion that *513the elderly tenant, in a state of extreme emotional distress, lacked a basic understanding of the situation confronting her and the significance of the settlement. The Civil Court was further justified in vacating the previously granted warrant of eviction, issued on default while tenant was on vacation in Florida, and in restoring tenant to possession of premises she occupied for many years. It is clear that the tenant timely mailed her rental checks from Florida to the address to which she had been accustomed for many years to send the checks. Unknown to her, there had been a change in managing agents. It appears that two of her rental checks were not received by the new managing agent which directed counsel to commence the eviction proceedings that resulted in the warrant of eviction. Under the circumstances, the Civil Court was correct in vacating the warrant of eviction and restoring the tenant to her apartment. On the other hand, the record fails to support the Civil Court’s determination that the eviction proceedings, and the subsequent settlement negotiations, were characterized by fraud and perjury on the part of petitioner landlord and its counsel and we disapprove those findings. We, of course, do not intimate any view as to the facts that may be developed in the separate action for damages commenced by the tenant against petitioner and its counsel. Concur—Fein, J. P., Sandler, Sullivan, Bloom and Carro, JJ. [102 Misc 2d 504.]