alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                     OF POLLUTION RESEARCH AND CONTROL CORP.

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and accompanies the quarterly annual report on Form 10-QSB (the "Form
10-QSB") for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, of Pollution Research and Control
Corp. (the "Issuer").

I, Jacques Tizabi, the Chief Executive Officer of the Issuer certify that to the
best of my knowledge:

(i) the Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or
78o(d)); and

(ii) the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Issuer.

Dated: May 15, 2003.




                                   /S/ JACQUES TIZABI
                              ----------------------------
                                   NAME: JACQUES TIZABI



                                    Page 21
# CERTIFICATION

 

Re:          **Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2013-C9, CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2013-C9**(the “Transaction”),issued pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 1, 2013(the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”), executed in connection with theTransaction (capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meaningsset forth in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement).

                                               

 

I, George Kok, certify that:

 

1.            I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D requiredto be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K ofMorgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2013-C9 (the “ExchangeAct periodic reports”);

 

2.            Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 

 

3.            Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other informationrequired to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this reportis included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

 

4.            Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in thisreport under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in theExchange Act periodic reports, the servicer(s) have fulfilled their obligationsunder the servicing agreement(s) in all material respects; and

 

5.            All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to beincluded in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB andExchange Act Rules 

               13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except asotherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances ofnoncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report onForm 10-K.  

 

In giving the certificationsabove, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the followingunaffiliated parties:

 

·        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asTrustee

·        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCertificate Administrator

·        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCustodian

·        Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNCBank, National Association, as Master Servicer

·        Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNCBank, National Association, as Special Servicer 

·        Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., asOperating Advisor

 

 

 

 

Date:  April 2, 2018

 

 

By /s/ George Kok

Name: George Kok

Title: President
#### In the Matter of Armco, Inc., Appellant, v Roebling Tube Corp., Respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on April 21, 1980, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Myers, J., at Special Term. Respondent shall recover of appellant $50 costs and disbursements of this appeal. Concur—Fein, J. P., Sandler, Sullivan, Bloom and Carro, JJ.
§ 963.14 Preclosure suitability criteria. DOE will evaluate preclosure suitability using the following criteria: ( a ) Ability to contain radioactive material and to limit releases of radioactive materials;
( b ) Ability to implement control and emergency systems to limit exposure to radiation;
( c ) Ability to maintain a system and components that perform their intended safety functions; and
( d ) Ability to preserve the option to retrieve wastes during the preclosure period.
§ 417.220 Are any procurement contracts included as covered transactions? ( a ) Covered transactions under this part: ( 1 ) Do not include any procurement contracts awarded directly by a Federal agency; but
( 2 ) Do include some procurement contracts awarded by non-Federal participants in nonprocurement covered transactions (*see* appendix to this part).
( b ) Specifically, a contract for goods or services is a covered transaction if any of the following applies: ( 1 ) The contract is awarded by a participant in a nonprocurement transaction that is covered under § 417.210, and the amount of the contract is expected to equal or exceed $25,000.
( 2 ) The contract requires the consent of a USDA official. In that case, the contract, regardless of the amount, always is a covered transaction, and it does not matter who awarded it. For example, it could be a subcontract awarded by a contractor at a tier below a nonprocurement transaction, as shown in the appendix to this part.
( 3 ) The contract is for federally-required audit services.
( c ) Any procurement contract to be implemented outside the United States that is below the primary tier covered transaction in a USDA foreign assistance program is not a covered transaction, notwithstanding the provisions in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section.
( d ) Any procurement contract to be implemented outside the United States that is below the primary tier covered transaction in a USDA export credit guarantee program or direct credit program is not a covered transaction, notwithstanding the provisions in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section.
( e ) Notwithstanding the fact that procurement contracts to be implemented outside the United States that are below the primary tier covered transaction in a USDA foreign assistance program, export credit guarantee program or direct credit program are not covered transactions, pursuant to paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section, primary tier participants under these programs must check the EPLS prior to entering into any procurement contract that is expected to equal or exceed $25,000 with a person at the first lower tier and shall not enter into such a procurement contract if the person is excluded or disqualified under the EPLS.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO

18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the QuarterlyReport of Atlantis Business Development Corporation (the "Company") on Form10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I Christopher Dubeau,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, tothe best of my knowledge, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended; and

 

(2) The information contained in thereport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

By: 

 

***/s/ Christopher Dubeau***

Christopher Dubeau

CEO

Dated:
§ 76.66 Expiration and termination of certificates. ( a ) Except as provided in § 76.55, each certificate or approval issued pursuant to this part expires at the end of the day, in the month and year stated in the certificate or approval.
( b ) The Corporation shall notify the Commission promptly, in writing under § 76.5, when the Corporation decides to terminate operation at either of the gaseous diffusion plants and other activities authorized under the certificate.
( c ) If the Corporation does not submit a renewal application under § 76.36, the Corporation shall, on or before the expiration date specified in the existing certificate, terminate operation of the gaseous diffusion plants.
[59 FR 48960, Sept. 23, 1994, as amended at 62 FR 6670, Feb. 12, 1997]
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 96-60518 Summary Calendar

DUDLEY JOSEPH AND MYRNA DUPUY CALLAHAN

Petitioners-Appellants

VERSUS

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL

Respondent-Appellee

Appeal from the Decision of the United States Tax Court (4863-94)

March 20, 1997
Before SMITH, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 1

Taxpayers, Dudley Joseph Callahan and Myrna Dupuy Callahan,

appeal the Tax Court’s decision in their suit for redetermination

of deficiencies and additions to tax assessed against them for

taxable years 1989, 1990, and 1991. The Tax Court in a detailed

and well-reasoned opinion, sustained the Commissioner’s

determination. Taxpayers claim error in four areas: 1)

determination that Mrs. Callahan’s writing activity for the years2

in question was an activity “not engaged in for profit” within the

meaning of Internal Revenue Code § 183; 2) disallowance of casualty

losses claimed in 1989 and 1990; 3) disallowance of miscellaneous

deductions for medical expenses, state sales taxes, and charitable

contributions; and 4) determination of certain additions to tax.

We have carefully reviewed the record and considered the

briefs of the parties and find no error committed by the Tax Court.

Accordingly, and for the reasons set forth by the Tax Court in its

detailed opinion, the decision of the Tax Court is

AFFIRMED.
§ 1200.20 Does this part apply to me? This part and, through this part, pertinent portions of the OMB guidance in subparts A through I of 2 CFR part 180 (see table at 2 CFR 180.100(b)) apply to you if you are a— ( a ) Participant or principal in a “covered transaction” (see subpart B of 2 CFR part 180 and the definition of “nonprocurement transaction” at 2 CFR 180.970;
( b ) Respondent in a Department of Transportation suspension or debarment action;
( c ) Department of Transportation debarment or suspension official;
( d ) Department of Transportation grants officer, agreements officer, or other official authorized to enter into any type of nonprocurement transaction that is a covered transaction.
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 93

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Transportation 

and Infrastructure in the One Hundred Ninth Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2005

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska submitted the following resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on 

Transportation and Infrastructure in the One Hundred 

Ninth Congress.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Transportation 

4 and Infrastructure (hereafter in this resolution referred 

5 to as the ‘‘Committee’’), including the expenses of all staff 

6 salaries, there shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts 

7 of the House of Representatives for committee salaries 

8 and expenses, not more than $18,582,105 for the One 

9 Hundred Ninth Congress. 
2

•HRES 93 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 

2 Of the amount specified in section 1—

3 (1) not more than $9,007,388 shall be available 

4 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

5 noon on January 3, 2005, and ending immediately 

6 before noon on January 3, 2006; and 

7 (2) not more than $9,574,717 shall be available 

8 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

9 noon on January 3, 2006, and ending immediately 

10 before noon on January 3, 2007. 

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on 

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration. 

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall 

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 

19 the Committee on House Administration.

Æ
#### § 3485.437 What method do I use to communicate to a participant the requirements described in § 180.435 of this title?

To communicate the requirements in this part to a participant, you must include a term or condition in the transaction that requires the participant's compliance with part 180, subpart C, of this title, as adopted at § 3485.12 and requires the participant to include a similar term or condition in lower-tier covered transactions.

(Authority: E.O. 12549 (3 CFR 1986 Comp., p. 189); E.O. 12689 (3 CFR 1989 Comp., p. 235); sec. 2455, Pub. L. 103-355, 108 Stat. 3327 (31 U.S.C. 6101 note); 20 U.S.C. 1082, 1094, 1221e-3, and 3474)
.Archer. Torlanda (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

" 

Joanne Young [Jyoung@yklaw.com] 

Monday, April 04, 2011 1 :29 PM 

Archer, Torlanda (OST) 

Cc: Gaynes, Jeffrey (OST); Gretch, Paul (OST); Lehman, Dayton (OST); Flemmings, Reather 

(OST); David Kirstein; Lyndsey Grunewald 

Subject: 

Attachments: 

Categories: 

FW: Spirit Airlines Waiver Request - Cuba Charters 

Spirit Waiver Request 3-29-11.pdf 

Red Category 

Thank you. We will serve the waiver application immediately, follow up with a telephone poll and send you the results as 

soon as possible 

Joanne W. Young 

Managing Partner 

Kirstein & Young, PLLC 

1750 K Street, NW 

Suite 200 

Washington, DC 20006 

Phone: (202) 331-3348 X 222 

Fax: (202) 331-3933 

Email: jyounq@yklaw.com 

From: Torlanda.Archer@dot.gov [mailto:Torlanda.Archer@dot.gov] 

Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 1:17 PM 

To: Joanne Young 

Cc: David Kirstein; Jeffrey.Gaynes@dot.gov; PauI.Gretch@dot.gov; Dayton.Lehman@dot.gov; 

Reather.Flemmings@dot.gov 

Subject: FW: Spirit Airlines Waiver Request - Cuba Charters 

Dear Ms. Young, 

o 

We note that Spirit did not serve its waiver application on any parties outside the Department of 

Transportation. In order for us to process the application, we ask you to serve it on the following 

attorneys, each of whom represents a Cuba charter operator with a long history of filing public 

charter prospectuses involving travel to and from Cuba. 

Lonnie Pera: Gulfstream Airlines, ABC Charters, etc. 

Susan Jollie: C&T Charters, 

Pierre Murphy: Wilson Int'I. Service, Inc 

Josh Romanow: XaeI Charters 

S~, 

7Ml4d4~. 

Special Authorities Division, X46 

USDOT lOST/alA 
1200 New Jersey Ave., SE W-86-445 

Washington, DC 20509 

202 366-2396 Fax: 202 366 3694 

Visit our website at: httpflostlLxweb.dot.gov!aviation!X-40%20Role Fites!publiccharters.htm 

From: Joanne Young [mailto:Jyoung@yklaw.coml 

Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 12:01 PM 

To: Archer, Torlanda (OST) 

Cc: Kurland, Susan (OST); Gretch, Paul COST); Rosenberg, Esta COST); David Kirstein 

Subject: Spirit Airlines Waiver Request - Cuba Charters 

Dear Ms. Archer, 

Please see the attached letter on behalf of Spirit Airlines requesting a waiver of the financial security arrangements 

required by 14 CFR §§ 212.7, 212.8, 380.34, 380.34a, and 380.35 specifically in connection with the sale and 

operation of Cuba charter flights from Fort Lauderdale Intemational Airport.. Please advise if you need 

additional information. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Joanne W. Young 

David M. Kirstein 

Counsel for Spirit Airlines 

Joanne W. Young 

Managing Partner 

Kirstein & Young, PLLC 

1750 K Street, NW 

Suite 200 

Washington, DC 20006 

Phone: (202) 331-3348 X 222 

Fax: (202) 331-3933 

Email: jyoung@yklaw.com 

2
# EUR-Lex - 31969R1826 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31969R1826

**Regulation (ECSC, EEC, Euratom) No 1826/69 of the Council of 15 September 1969 laying down the form of the 'laissez passer' to be issued to members and servants of the institutions **

*
Official Journal L 235 , 18/09/1969 P. 0001 - 0005 Finnish special edition: Chapter 1 Volume 1 P. 0053 Danish special edition: Series I Chapter 1969(II) P. 0382 Swedish special edition: Chapter 1 Volume 1 P. 0053 English special edition: Series I Chapter 1969(II) P. 0390 Greek special edition: Chapter 01 Volume 4 P. 000P Spanish special edition: Chapter 01 Volume 6 P. 0005 Portuguese special edition Chapter 01 Volume 6 P. 0005 *

REGULATION (ECSC, EEC, EURATOM) No 1826/69 OF THE COUNCIL of 15 September 1969 laying down the form of the "laissez passer" to be issued to members and servants of the institutions

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to Article 7 (1) of the Protocol of the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities annexed to the Treaty establishing a Single Council and a Single Commission of the European Communities;

Whereas Article 7 (1) of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities provides that the Council shall prescribe the form of the laissez passer which may be issued to members and servants of the institutions by the Presidents of those institutions;

Whereas a single form of laissez passer should be prescribed for all the institutions and whereas it is therefore appropriate to repeal Regulation No 2 (1) of the Council of the European Economic Community and of the Council of the European Atomic Energy Community establishing the form of the laissez passer issued to members of the European Parliament;

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The laissez passer issued to members and servants of the institutions shall be drawn up in the form laid down in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

Regulation No 2 of the Council of the European Economic Community and of the Council of the European Atomic Energy Community of 1 July 1958 is hereby repealed.

However, the laissez passer issued pursuant to that Regulation shall remain valid until the issue of laissez passer in accordance with this Regulation.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 September 1969.

For the Council

The President

H.J. DE KOSTER (1)OJ No 17, 6.10.1958, p. 387/58 and p. 403/58.

ANNEX

>PIC FILE= "T9000294">

>PIC FILE= "T9000295">
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 617 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 617

   Supporting the goals and ideals of National Teen Dating Violence 
                     Awareness and Prevention Week.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 15, 2005

 Ms. Millender-McDonald (for herself and Mrs. Johnson of Connecticut) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                          on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Supporting the goals and ideals of National Teen Dating Violence 
                     Awareness and Prevention Week.

Whereas 1 in 3 female high school students reports being physically abused or 
        sexually abused by a dating partner;
Whereas over 40 percent of male and female high school students surveyed had 
        been victims of dating violence at least once;
Whereas violent relationships in adolescence can have serious ramifications for 
        victims, who are at higher risk for substance abuse, eating disorders, 
        risky sexual behavior, suicide, and adult re-vicimization;
Whereas the severity of violence among intimate partners has been shown to 
        increase if the pattern was established in adolescence;
Whereas 81 percent of parents surveyed either believed dating violence is not a 
        problem or admitted they did not know it is a problem;
Whereas the week of February 6, 2006, has been recognized as an appropriate week 
        for activities furthering awareness of teen dating violence; and
Whereas recognizing a ``National Teen Dating Violence Awareness and Prevention 
        Week'' would benefit schools, communities, and families regardless of 
        socioeconomic status, race, or gender: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives should raise awareness 
of teen dating violence in the Nation by supporting the goals and 
ideals of National Teen Dating Violence Awareness and Prevention Week.
                                 <all>
```
§ 1.226 Who does not have to register under this subpart? This subpart does not apply to the following facilities: ( a ) A foreign facility, if food from such facility undergoes further manufacturing/processing (including packaging) by another facility outside the United States. A facility is not exempt under this provision if the further manufacturing/processing (including packaging) conducted by the subsequent facility consists of adding labeling or any similar activity of a *de minimis* nature;
( b ) Farms;
( c ) Retail food establishments;
( d ) Restaurants;
( e ) Nonprofit food establishments in which food is prepared for, or served directly to, the consumer;
( f ) Fishing vessels, including those that not only harvest and transport fish but also engage in practices such as heading, eviscerating, or freezing intended solely to prepare fish for holding on board a harvest vessel. However, those fishing vessels otherwise engaged in processing fish are subject to this subpart. For the purposes of this section, “processing” means handling, storing, preparing, shucking, changing into different market forms, manufacturing, preserving, packing, labeling, dockside unloading, holding, or heading, eviscerating, or freezing other than solely to prepare fish for holding on board a harvest vessel;
( g ) Facilities that are regulated exclusively, throughout the entire facility, by the U.S. Department of Agriculture under the Federal Meat Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 601 *et seq.*), the Poultry Products Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 451 *et seq.*), or the Egg Products Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 1031 *et seq.*);