alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 850.20 Baseline beryllium inventory. ( a ) The responsible employer must develop a baseline inventory of the locations of beryllium operations and other locations of potential beryllium contamination, and identify the workers exposed or potentially exposed to beryllium at those locations.
( b ) In conducting the baseline inventory, the responsible employer must: ( 1 ) Review current and historical records;
( 2 ) Interview workers;
( 3 ) Document the characteristics and locations of beryllium at the facility; and
( 4 ) Conduct air, surface, and bulk sampling.
( c ) The responsible employer must ensure that: ( 1 ) The baseline beryllium inventory is managed by a qualified individual (e.g., a certified industrial hygienist); and
( 2 ) The individuals assigned to this task have sufficient knowledge and experience to perform such activities properly.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-30163

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

TYRUS MIGUEL COOPER,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 3:04-CR-138-1

Before SMITH, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Tyrus Miguel Cooper

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Cooper has filed a response. He has also filed

a motion for the appointment of counsel. Our independent review of the record,

counsel’s brief, and Cooper’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 26, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-30163 Document: 00511274559 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/26/2010
No. 10-30163

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Cooper’s motion for the appointment of counsel is DENIED.

2

Case: 10-30163 Document: 00511274559 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/26/2010
###### Editorial Note on Part 180

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 180 appear at 79 FR 75879, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 180.955 Indictment.

*Indictment* means an indictment for a criminal offense. A presentment, information, or other filing by a competent authority charging a criminal offense shall be given the same effect as an indictment.
Process Diagram Photos

Location A: Mining & Location B: Crushing

Photo A1: Production Truck and Shovel

A1

B1

B2
Photo B1: Crusher

Photo B2: Surge Pile
Location C: Concentrating

Photo C1: Autogenous Grinding Mills

C1 C7

C2

C9

C3

C4 C5

C10

C6

C8
Photo C2: Roughers

Photo C3: Cyclones
Photo C4: Finishers

Photo C5: Fine Screens
Photo C6: Ventimill Grinding Mill
Photo C7: Cobbing Reject Pile

Photo C8: Hydroseperator
Photo C9: Tailings Basin

Photo C10: Concentrate Thickener
Location D: Pelletizing

Photo D1: Disc Filters

D1

D3

D6

D4

D7

D5 D2

D8
Photo D2: Concentrate Stockpile

Photo D3: Storage Bins
Photo D4: Bentonite Addition

Photo D5: Water Addition Photo 
Photo D6: Balling Drums

Photo D7: Green Ball Roll Screens
Photo D8: Conveying
Location D: Pelletizing 

Photo: Exterior Indurating Furnace Profile

D9

D10

D12

D11

D13

D14

D17 D16

D18 D19

D20

D21

4

D21

4

D15

4
Photo D9: Indurating Furnace

Photo D10: Roll Conveyor at Feed End of Furnace
Photo D11: Ducting for Feed End Scrubber

Photo D12: Updraft Drying Zone
Photo D13: Lower Burner

Photo D14: Pallet Cars
Photo D15: Empty Pallet Cars

Photo D16: Pallet Cars emptying final product at end of furnace
Photo D17: Green Fine Return

Photo D18: Exterior conveyor to pellet load out bins
Photo D19: Pellet Load Out Bins

Photo D20: Furnace Discharge Scrubber
Photo D21: Furnace Exhaust Stacks
#### § 95.47 Destruction of matter containing classified information.

Documents containing classified information may be destroyed by burning, pulping, or another method that ensures complete destruction of the information that they contain. The method of destruction must preclude recognition or reconstruction of the classified information. Any doubts on methods should be referred to the CSA.

[64 FR 15653, Apr. 1, 1999]
Exhibit 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
Velocity Asset Management, Inc. for the three months ended September 30, 2004,
I, James J. Mastriani, Chief Financial Officer of Velocity Asset Management,
Inc., do hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge
and belief, that:

                  (1) such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the three months
                  ended September 30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements
                  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
                  1934; and

                  (2) the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form
                  10-QSB for the three months ended September 30, 2004, fairly
                  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
                  and results of operations of Velocity Asset Management, Inc.


                                    /s/ JAMES J. MASTRIANI
                                    ----------------------------
                                    James J. Mastriani
                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                    November 15, 2004

                                       25
<PAGE>
 
                                                                     EXHIBIT 24
 
                               POWER OF ATTORNEY
 
  KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned officers and
Directors of Raptor Systems, Inc. hereby constitutes and appoints each of
Robert A. Steinkrauss and John S. Ingalls, acting together or singularly, his
true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution
and resubstitution, for him in his name, place and stead, in any and all
capacities, (i) to sign an Annual Report on Form 10-K (the "Annual Report")
for the year 1996 pursuant to Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), (ii) to sign any and all
amendments to such Annual Report, and (iii) to file the same, with all
exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission under the Exchange Act. The undersigned
hereby ratifies and confirms all that such attorney-in-fact or his substitute
may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
 
              SIGNATURE                      CAPACITY                DATE
 
                                       Chairman, Chief          March  , 1997
-------------------------------------   Executive Officer
        ROBERT A. STEINKRAUSS           and Director
                                        (Principal
                                        Executive Officer)
 
                                       President, Chief         March  , 1997
-------------------------------------   Operating Officer
           SHAUN MCCONNON               and Director
 
                                       Vice President of        March  , 1997
-------------------------------------   Finance and Chief
           JOHN S. INGALLS              Financial Officer
                                        (Principal
                                        Financial Officer)
 
                                       Vice President,          March  , 1997
-------------------------------------   Treasurer and
          ROBERT H. FINCKE              Controller
                                        (Principal
                                        Accounting Officer)
 
                                       Director                 March  , 1997
-------------------------------------
          WILLIAM S. KAISER
 
                                       Director                 March  , 1997
-------------------------------------
            BRIAN D. OWEN
 
                                       Director                 March  , 1997
-------------------------------------
         ERNEST C. PARIZEAU
 
                                       Director                 March  , 1997
-------------------------------------
           DAVID A. PENSAK
 
                                       Director                 March  , 1997
-------------------------------------
          ROBERT SCHECHTER
§ 1107.44 FDA action on an SE Report. After receipt of an SE Report, FDA will: ( a ) Refuse to accept the SE Report for review if it does not comply with § 1107.18 and § 1105.10 of this chapter;
( b ) Request additional information as provided in § 1107.40(d);
( c ) Issue a letter administratively closing the SE Report if it is not possible to make a determination on an SE Report;
( d ) Issue a letter canceling the SE Report if FDA finds the SE Report was created in error;
( e ) Issue an order as described in § 1107.46 finding the new tobacco product to be substantially equivalent and in compliance with the requirements of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act; or
( f ) Issue an order as described in § 1107.48 denying marketing authorization because the new tobacco product is: ( 1 ) Not substantially equivalent to a tobacco product commercially marketed (other than for test marketing) in the United States on February 15, 2007, or
( 2 ) Not in compliance with the requirements of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
Draft Proposal CB-9 

This concept has been developed by the DOE Building Energy Codes Program (BECP) as a possible code

change proposal to the Commercial provisions of the 2012 International Energy Conservation Code

(IECC).   Interested parties are asked to submit any and all comments on DOE's initial concepts and draft

code change proposals. For instructions on submitting comments, visit:

www.energycodes.gov/development/commercial/codes/iecc/concepts/

Roof Solar Reflectance and Thermal Emittance (CB-9) 

Objective:  Simplify criteria for low sloped roofs by adding a definition for the term “low slope roof.”

Suggested Code Change Proposal

Revise Section C402.2.1.1 and add a new definition to Section C202 as follows:  

C402.2.1.1 Roof solar reflectance and thermal emittance. Low sloped roofs, with a slope less than 2 

units vertical in 12 units horizontal, directly above cooled conditioned spaces in Climate Zones 1, 2, and 3 

shall comply with one or more of the options in Table C402.2.1.1. 

(Exceptions remain unchanged.)

C202. LOW SLOPED ROOF. A roof having a slope less than 2 units vertical in 12 units horizontal.

Reason: The current code text includes within it a definition that might be better placed in the

definitions section of the code.  Alternatively, if this is the only place the term is used, the need for a

definition is moot if the text is then revised as “Roofs with a slope less than 2 units vertical in 12 units

horizontal directly above....”

Cost Impact:   There is no cost impact associated with this proposed change.
§ 1128.325 Fee or profit. ( a ) *Requirement.* A DoD Component's general terms and conditions must specify that recipients may neither receive fee or profit nor pay fee or profit to subrecipients.
( b ) *Award terms and conditions.* A DoD Component must use the wording appendix C to this part provides for Section D of FMS Article III to specify the limitation on payment of fee or profit.
Editorial Note on Part 34
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 34 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 34.31 Inspection and maintenance of radiographic exposure devices, transport and storage containers, associated equipment, source changers, and survey instruments. ( a ) The licensee shall perform visual and operability checks on survey meters, radiographic exposure devices, transport and storage containers, associated equipment and source changers before use on each day the equipment is to be used to ensure that the equipment is in good working condition, that the sources are adequately shielded, and that required labeling is present. Survey instrument operability must be performed using check sources or other appropriate means. If equipment problems are found, the equipment must be removed from service until repaired.
( b ) Each licensee shall have written procedures for: ( 1 ) Inspection and routine maintenance of radiographic exposure devices, source changers, associated equipment, transport and storage containers, and survey instruments at intervals not to exceed 3 months or before the first use thereafter to ensure the proper functioning of components important to safety. Replacement components shall meet design specifications. If equipment problems are found, the equipment must be removed from service until repaired.
( 2 ) Inspection and maintenance necessary to maintain the Type B packaging used to transport radioactive materials. The inspection and maintenance program must include procedures to assure that Type B packages are shipped and maintained in accordance with the certificate of compliance or other approval.
( c ) Records of equipment problems and of any maintenance performed under paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section must be made in accordance with § 34.73.
exv10w8



 







EXHIBIT 10.8




HANOVER COMPRESSOR COMPANY




Schedule of Compensation for Non-Employee Directors

(Effective July 21, 2006)




	 	 	 
	 
	Annual Retainer

	 	$30,000
	 
	Committee Chairman Annual Retainer
	 	 
	 
	      Audit Committee

	 	$15,000
	 
	      Compensation Committee

	 	$15,000
	 
	      Finance Committee

	 	$10,000
	 
	      Governance Committee

	 	$10,000
	 
	Board Chairman Annual Retainer

	 	$120,000
	 
	Attendance Fee

	 	$1,500 paid for all in-person and telephonic board and
committee meetings.
	 
	Restricted Stock

	 	Time-vested restricted stock valued at approximately $105,000 on the date
of grant and subject to the terms of 2006 Stock Incentive
Plan. The shares vest one-third per year over a three-year
period, subject however, to immediate vesting in the event
of a change in control.
	 
	 	 
	 

	 	Directors are required to hold the shares until they cease
to serve as a director (except to the extent necessary to
meet the associated tax obligation).
	 
	Reimbursement of Travel Expenses

	 	100% of travel and other expenses while on company business.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1001 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 1001

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         July 18, 2018.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 119) expressing 
the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United 
States economy. All points of order against consideration of the concurrent 
resolution are waived. The concurrent resolution shall be considered as read. 
All points of order against provisions in the concurrent resolution are waived. 
The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the concurrent 
resolution and preamble to adoption without intervening motion or demand for 
division of the question except one hour of debate equally divided and 
controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and 
Means.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
# EUR-Lex - 31994D0273 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31994D0273

**94/273/EC: Commission Decision of 18 April 1994 concerning veterinary certification for placing on the market in the United Kingdom and Ireland of dogs and cats not originating in those countries **

*
Official Journal L 117 , 07/05/1994 P. 0037 - 0039 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 57 P. 0076 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 57 P. 0076 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 18 April 1994 concerning veterinary certification for placing on the market in the United Kingdom and Ireland of dogs and cats not originating in those countries (94/273/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 92/65/EEC of 13 July 1992 concerning laying down animal health requirements governing trade in and imports into the Community of animals, semen, ova and embryos not subject to animal health requirements laid down in specific Community rules referred to in Annex A (I) to Directive 90/425/EEC (1), and in particular Article 10 (3) (a) (vii) thereof,

Whereas it is necessary to establish a veterinary certificate for dogs and cats that are placed on the market in the United Kingdom and Ireland and not originating in those countries;

Whereas the animals concerned must fulfil the relevant necessary health conditions, as reflected in the certificate and duly attested to by an authorized veterinarian;

Whereas conforming to Article 10 (3) (a) (vii) dogs and cats must be accompanied by an individual vaccination record;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The model of the certificate provided for in Article 10 (3) (a) (vii) of Directive 92/65/EEC is established in the Annex.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 April 1994.

For the Commission

René STEICHEN

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 268, 14. 9. 1992, p. 54.

ANNEX

(1) Health certificates may be drawn up only for animals which are to be transported in the same mode of transport and which come from the same holding and which are being sent to the same consignee.

(2) Delete where not applicable.

(3) The certificate is valid for only one species at a time.

(4) Give the registration number in the case of lorries, trucks, vans or cars, the flight number in the case of aircraft, the name in the case of boat/ship, and in the case of rail travel, the estimated date and time of arrival.

(5) Delete where not applicable.
Description of Director Compensation



 Exhibit 10.3 
 Description of Compensation Payable to Non-Employee Directors 
 (updated May 2, 2006)

 The following summarizes the current compensation and benefits received by the Company’s non-employee directors. It is
intended to be a summary of existing arrangements and is not intended to provide any additional rights to any director. 
 Each of the
Company’s non-employee directors is entitled to receive an annual stock grant of shares having a value equal to $60,000 for serving on the Company’s Board of Directors, and an attendance fee paid in cash of $1,000 per meeting of the Board
of Directors if the meeting is attended in person or $250 if the meeting is attended telephonically. The stock grants to the non-employee directors vest at the next succeeding annual meeting of stockholders of the Company. Pursuant to an arrangement
with Z. Jamie Behar’s employer, all director fees for Ms. Behar (including the annual stock grant) are paid in cash to her employer. 
 In addition, each member of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is entitled to an attendance fee of $1,000 per committee meeting or $500 if the meeting is attended telephonically.
The chair of the Audit Committee receives $10,000, the chair of the Compensation Committee receives $4,000 and the chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee receives $1,000, in each case, in cash payable in quarterly installments.

 Directors are also entitled to reimbursement for expenses incurred in fulfilling their duties as directors and receive complimentary hotel
rooms at the Company’s hotels and resorts when on personal travel. In certain circumstances, directors may also receive such complimentary hotel rooms for one year following their retirement or resignation from the Board.
#### McLAUGHLIN v. McLAUGHLIN REAL ESTATE CO. et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 19, 1914.)

Action by Leonora McLaughlin against the McLaughlin Real Estate Company and others.

No opinion. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. For former decision, see 148 N. Y. Supp. 1128.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-7295

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MURDOCK RAEFORD SHERROD,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (5:18-cr-00067-BR-1)

Submitted: February 17, 2022 Decided: February 23, 2022

Before AGEE and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Murdock Raeford Sherrod, Appellant Pro Se. David A. Bragdon, Assistant United States 

Attorney, Joshua L. Rogers, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED 

STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Murdock Raeford Sherrod, a federal prisoner, appeals from the district court’s order 

denying his motion for compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i), as 

amended by the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 

5239. We review a district court’s denial of a motion for compassionate release for abuse 

of discretion. United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 142 S. Ct. 

383 (2021). We have reviewed the record and discern no abuse of discretion. The district 

court denied Sherrod’s motion after assessing the applicable 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors 

and sufficiently explained its reasons for the denial. See United States v. High, 997 F.3d 

181, 188-91 (4th Cir. 2021) (discussing amount of explanation required for denial of 

compassionate release motion). We therefore affirm the district court’s order. We deny 

Sherrod’s motion for appointment of counsel and we dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court 

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 1536.500 Who in the Environmental Protection Agency determines that a recipient other than an individual violated the requirements of this part?

The EPA Administrator or designee is the official authorized to make the determination under 2 CFR 182.500.
February 27, 2012

Mr. Scott Bohning

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 9

75 Hawthorne Street

Mail Code AIR-7

San Francisco, CA 94105

Re: January 2012 Navajo Generating Station BARTModeling Archive Disk

Dear Mr. Bohning:Please find the enclosed disk containing Navajo Generating Station BART Modeling Archive

data.If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office at (602) 236-2928.

Sincerely,

Angelina Cervantes, Assistant to

Grant Smedley, Manager

Environmental Policy & Innovation

EC14462. 0212
#### § 1.1199 Are electronic records created under this subpart subject to the electronic records requirements of part 11 of this chapter?

Records that are established or maintained to satisfy the requirements of this subpart and that meet the definition of electronic records in § 11.3(b)(6) of this chapter are exempt from the requirements of part 11 of this chapter. Records that satisfy the requirements of this subpart, but that also are required under other applicable statutory provisions or regulations, remain subject to part 11 of this chapter.