alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
Velocity Asset Management, Inc. for the three months ended March 31, 2005, I,
James J. Mastriani, Chief Financial Officer of Velocity Asset Management, Inc.,
do hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:

         (1)  such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended
         March 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
         or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
         for the three months ended March 31, 2005, fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         Velocity Asset Management, Inc.


                                       /s/ JAMES J. MASTRIANI
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       James J. Mastriani
                                       Chief Financial Officer
May 19, 2005

                                       27
§ 601.20 Does this part apply to me? This part and, through this part, pertinent portions of the OMB guidance in subparts A through I of 2 CFR part 180 (see table at 2 CFR 180.100(b)) apply to you if you are a— ( a ) Participant or principal in a “covered transaction” (see subpart B of 2 CFR part 180 and the definition of “nonprocurement transaction” at 2 CFR 180.970);
( b ) Respondent in a DOS suspension or debarment action;
( c ) DOS debarment or suspension official; and
( d ) DOS grants officer, agreements officer, or other official authorized to enter into any type of nonprocurement transaction that is a covered transaction.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                           3,834
<SECURITIES>                                    39,948
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,350
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (549)
<INVENTORY>                                        421
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                64,730
<PP&E>                                           9,571
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,043)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  76,971
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,431
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            23
<OTHER-SE>                                      55,943
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    76,971
<SALES>                                         30,574
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                30,574
<CGS>                                           13,374
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,374
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,048
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 286
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,010
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,248
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,763
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,763
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7717

ROY GAREY LINDSEY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL W. MOORE; CHARLES M. CONDON, Attorney

General of the State of South Carolina,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. William B. Traxler, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-96-126-10-21BD)

Submitted: March 31, 1999 Decided: July 29, 1999

Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roy Garey Lindsey, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief

Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina; Robert Eric

Petersen, William Ansel Collins, Jr., Byron Ronald Roberts, SOUTH

CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Columbia, South Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on

his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. See Lindsey v. Moore, No. CA-96-

126-10-21BD (D.S.C. July 30, 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### O’BEIRNE v. CAREY.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

December 24, 1914.)

1. Appeal and Error (§ 127*)—Judgments Appealable—Defaults.

No appeal will lie from a judgment taken by default.

[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Appeal and Error, Cent. Dig. §§ 885-889, 891; Dec. Dig. § 127.*]

2. Physicians and Surgeons (§ 22*) — Dentists — Action for Services — Right to Practice.

A recovery cannot lawfully be had for dental services, in the absence of proof that the practitioner was duly licensed to practice in accordance with the laws of the state.

[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Physicians and Surgeons, Cent. Dig. § 51; Dec. Dig. § 22.*]

3. Judgment (§ 143*)—Default—Application to Vacate—Excuse.

On an application to vacate a default judgment, the fact that defendant’s nonappearance was due to his .temporary absence from the city on business was a good excuse.

[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Judgment, Cent. Dig. §§ 269, 270, 272-291; Dec. Dig. § 143.*]

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Fourth District.

Action by George O’Beirne against James A. Carey. From a Municipal Court order, denying a motion to open a judgment, and from a judgment taken on default, defendant appeals. Reversed, judgment vacated, and new trial ordered.

Argued December term, 1914, before GUY, BIJUR, and PAGE, JJ.

Clark A. Wick, of New York City, for appellant.

William L. Tierney, of New York City, for respondent.

*

For other cases see same topic & § number in Dec. & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Rep'r Indexes

BIJUR, J.

[1] No appeal will lie from a judgment taken by default, and the appeal from the judgment must therefore be dismissed.

[2] Plaintiff sues for services rendered by his two assignors, as dentists, to defendant and his wife. The rendition of the services and the value was proved at the inquest, but it does not appear that the plaintiff’s assignors were duly licensed to practice their profession, as provided by the laws of this state; consequently there was no cause of action proven against the defendant, and the order denying the motion to open his default must be reversed.

*667[3] We are further supported in this determination by the fact that defendant presented a good excuse for his nonappearance; i. e., a brief and a temporary absence from the city on business.

Order .reversed, judgment vacated, and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant. All concur.
#### § 600.18 [Reserved]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 934 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 934

Supporting the goals and ideals of Plan Ahead with an Advance Directive 
                                 Week.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 20, 2006

 Mr. Gingrey submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Supporting the goals and ideals of Plan Ahead with an Advance Directive 
                                 Week.

Whereas life and death situations confront hundreds of thousands of persons 
        within the United States each year due to life threatening illness or 
        injury;
Whereas advance directives offer individuals the opportunity to discuss with 
        loved ones and family members in advance and decide what measures would 
        be appropriate for them when it comes to end-of-life care;
Whereas the preparation of an advance directive, would advise family members, 
        medical providers, and other persons of how an individual would want to 
        be treated in certain crisis situations;
Whereas physicians, other health care providers, clergy, legal counsel, and 
        family members should, or may, provide guidance and insight into 
        determining the final wishes of a person when an advance directive is 
        being prepared;
Whereas to avoid any legal or medical confusion due to the emotions involved in 
        end-of-life decisions, it is in the best interest of all Americans that 
        each person over the age of 18 communicate his or her wishes by creating 
        an advance directive; and
Whereas the designation of the first week of April each year as Plan Ahead with 
        an Advance Directive Week would give honor and respect to all persons as 
        they make critical decisions about their end-of-life care and allow 
        death with dignity according to their own decisions: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of Plan Ahead with an 
        Advance Directive Week;
            (2) encourages each person in the United States who is over 
        the age of 18 to prepare an advance directive to assist his or 
        her family members and medical professionals and others as they 
        honor his or her final wishes; and
            (3) encourages medical, civic, educational, religious, and 
        other nonprofit organizations to encourage individuals to 
        prepare advance directives to ensure that their wishes and 
        rights with respect to end-of-life care are protected.
                                 <all>
```
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Anthony Sfarra, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports onForm 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this reporton Form 10-K of the WFRBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2013-C12 (the"Exchange Act periodic reports");

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, takenas a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing andother information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the periodcovered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statementsrequired in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except asdisclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilledtheir obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicingcriteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports onassessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesrequired to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 ofRegulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as anexhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Anymaterial instances of noncompliance described in such reports have beendisclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied oninformation provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

 

National Cooperative Bank, N.A. (successor to NCB, FSB), as NCBMaster Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, NationalCooperative Bank, N.A. (successor to NCB, FSB), as Co-op Special Servicer, U.S.Bank National Association, as Trustee, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as TrustAdvisor, CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant, PGIM RealEstate Loan Services, Inc. (formerly known as Prudential AssetResources, Inc.), as Primary Servicer, Computershare Trust Company,National Association, as Servicing Function Participant for the CertificateAdministrator on and after November 1, 2021, and Computershare Trust Company,National Association, as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian onand after November 1, 2021. 

 

 

Dated: March 15, 2022 

 

/s/ Anthony Sfarra

Anthony Sfarra

President

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
#### § 2205.100 Adoption of 2 CFR Part 200.

Under the authority listed above, the Corporation for National and Community Service adopts the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) Guidance in 2 CFR part 200, except as specified in this part. Thus, this part gives regulatory effect to the OMB guidance and supplements the guidance for recipients of awards from the Corporation.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from BT Office
Products International, Inc. Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          20,163
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  208,544
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,915
<INVENTORY>                                    119,370
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               392,006
<PP&E>                                         129,898
<DEPRECIATION>                                  51,483
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 742,819
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          238,061
<BONDS>                                        215,455
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           335
<OTHER-SE>                                     268,317
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   742,819
<SALES>                                      1,412,514
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,412,514
<CGS>                                        1,004,713
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,374,331
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,573
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 27,701
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,701
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,701
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.44
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1



STRATEX NETWORKS, INC.



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the periodic report of Stratex Networks, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Charles D. Kissner, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes
of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.



This Certification has not been, and shall not
be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                       |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 9, 2004 |  | /s/ Charles D. Kissner 
|                       |  | Charles D. Kissner     
|                       |  | Chief Executive Officer
#### § 200.429 Commencement and convocation costs.

For IHEs, costs incurred for commencements and convocations are unallowable, except as provided for in (B)(9) Student Administration and Services, in appendix III to this part, as activity costs.

[85 FR 49565, Aug. 13, 2020]
Editorial Note on Part 12
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 12 appear at 88 FR 45064, July 14, 2023.

§ 12.70 Authority of presiding officer. The presiding officer has all powers necessary to conduct a fair, expeditious, and orderly hearing, including the power to— ( a ) Specify and change the date, time, and place of oral hearings and conferences;
( b ) Establish the procedures for use in developing evidentiary facts, including the procedures in § 12.92(b) and to rule on the need for oral testimony and cross-examination under § 12.87(b);
( c ) Prepare statements of the areas of factual disagreement among the participants;
( d ) Hold conferences to settle, simplify, or determine the issues in a hearing or to consider other matters that may expedite the hearing;
( e ) Administer oaths and affirmations;
( f ) Control the course of the hearing and the conduct of the participants;
( g ) Examine witnesses and strike their testimony if they fail to respond fully to proper questions;
( h ) Rule on, admit, exclude, or limit evidence;
( i ) Set the time for filing pleadings;
( j ) Rule on motions and other procedural matters;
( k ) Rule on motions for summary decision under § 12.93;
( l ) Conduct the hearing in stages if the number of parties is large or the issues are numerous and complex;
( m ) Waive, suspend, or modify any rule in this subpart under § 10.19 if the presiding officer determines that no party will be prejudiced, the ends of justice will be served, and the action is in accordance with law;
( n ) Strike the participation of any person under § 12.45(e) or exclude any person from the hearing under § 12.90, or take other reasonable disciplinary action; and
( o ) Take any action for the fair, expeditious, and orderly conduct of the hearing.
**AD Economic Evaluation**

Docket No . FAA - 2013 - 0350 Directorate ID : 2012 - SW - 050 - AD Helicopter Model: AgustaWestland S.p.A. Model A119 and AW119 MKII Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 65 Helicopters in the US Registry . Reason : The actions of this AD are intended to ensure the windows do not detach from the doors, potentially

injuring persons on the ground and damaging the helicopter’s tailboom and the tail rotor blades. Costs : Parts per Helicopter negligib le Labor per Helicopter ( 0.5 work - hour x $ 8 5 /work - hour for the inspection) (1.5 work - hours x $85/work- hour for the bonding) $ 43 $128 Other (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $ 43 for the inspection $128 for the bonding Total US Fleet Cost $ 2 ,795 for the inspection Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory

Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory

Flexibility

Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : Sharon Miles
<PAGE>   1


                                   Exhibit 11


<TABLE>
Statement re:  computation of per share earnings
------------------------------------------------

<CAPTION>
                                           Thirteen Weeks Ended     Twenty-six Weeks Ended
                                          March 30,      March 31,    March 30,    March 31,
                                            1997           1996         1997         1996
                                         ----------   ----------     ----------   ----------
<S>                                      <C>          <C>            <C>          <C>
Weighted average shares outstanding      12,212,571   12,783,843     12,207,780   13,004,728

Common Stock equivalents:
  Stock options                              58,056       46,886         67,682       68,119
                                         ----------   ----------     ----------   ----------

                                         12,270,627   12,830,729     12,275,462   13,072,847
                                         ==========   ==========     ==========   ==========

                                 
     Net Income (Loss)                     $815,000  ($2,642,000)    $1,907,000  ($2,097,000)
                                         ==========   ==========     ==========   ==========



EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE                $      .07   $     (.21)           .16         (.16)
                                         ==========   ==========     ==========   ==========

</TABLE>






                                       14
§ 1107.48 Issuance of an order denying marketing authorization. ( a ) *General.* FDA will issue an order that the new tobacco product cannot be marketed if FDA finds that: ( 1 ) The information submitted in the SE Report does not establish that the new tobacco product is substantially equivalent to a predicate tobacco product that was commercially marketed (other than for test marketing) in the United States on February 15, 2007; or
( 2 ) The new tobacco product is not in compliance with the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
( b ) *Basis for order.* The order will describe the basis for denying marketing authorization.