alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 592 

Condemning the violent attack at Flint Bishop International Airport on a 

police officer and offering thoughts and prayers to the victim and the 

victim’s family, and commending the efforts of law enforcement and 

airport personnel in their response. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 26, 2017 

Mr. KILDEE submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Condemning the violent attack at Flint Bishop International 

Airport on a police officer and offering thoughts and 

prayers to the victim and the victim’s family, and commending the efforts of law enforcement and airport personnel in their response. 

Whereas, on June 21, 2017, Flint Bishop Airport Police 

Lieutenant Jeff Neville was viciously attacked with a 

knife while on duty, sustaining serious injury; 

Whereas the heroic actions of Lt. Neville, who, despite being 

attacked, worked to subdue the attacker to prevent further harm to other people; 

Whereas other employees at Bishop International Airport, including maintenance worker Rich Krul, Public Safety 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 592 IH 

Chief Chris Miller, and Firefighter Lieutenant Dan 

Owen, all assisted with the apprehension of the attacker; 

Whereas the Bishop Airport public safety team members 

demonstrated that they were prepared and willing to risk 

their own lives to ensure the safety of other passengers 

at Bishop International Airport; 

Whereas Public Safety Officers Michael Chilson and Christopher Tolin administered first aid to stabilize Lt. Neville 

for transport to Hurley Hospital; 

Whereas the medical staff at Hurley Hospital provided quick 

and life-saving medical care to Lt. Neville, allowing his 

full recovery; 

Whereas the local Muslim community quickly condemned the 

attack and donated financial resources toward Lt. Neville’s medical bills; 

Whereas law enforcement and first responders in Michigan 

bravely protected people at Bishop Airport, resulting in 

no loss of life; and 

Whereas the people of the United States stand in solidarity 

against all acts of violence toward law enforcement officials: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) condemns the vicious terror attack at Flint 

3 Bishop International Airport on June 21, 2017; 

4 (2) offers thoughts and prayers to Lt. Neville 

5 and his family; 

6 (3) reaffirms the commitment of the United 

7 States to actively combat all forms of violence 

8 against law enforcement officers; and 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 592 IH 

1 (4) commends the efforts of law enforcement, 

2 first responders, and airport personnel who acted to 

3 subdue the attacker and help those in need. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                             Exhibit (10)(ii)(A)

Annual Performance Incentive Plan - Additional Information

The Organization and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the
Company (the "Committee") establishes annual Company performance objectives
under the Company's Restated Annual Incentive Performance Plan, as amended (the
APIP), the Company's annual cash incentive compensation plan for executive
officers, and the Stock Incentive Plan. The Committee sets a threshold and a
target level for each measure of Company performance, which will determine the
cash amount payable under the APIP to an executive officer. If Company
performance on a measure is below the threshold level, no incentive payment will
be made for that measure. The Committee assigns each executive officer a
percentage of base pay (targeted amount) used to calculate benefits under the
APIP.

The Company's performance objectives under the APIP for the fiscal year ending
May 26, 2006 (FY 2007) are specified levels of net sales and operating income
before income taxes (excluding nonrecurring items at the discretion of the
Committee). Fifty percent of the participant's award is based on net sales and
fifty percent of the award is based on operating income before income taxes. The
target amounts for FY2007 are 100% of base pay for the chief executive officer
and ranged from 50% to 65% of base pay for the other executive officers. Under
the APIP for FY 2007, an executive officer can receive from 0% to 200% of the
applicable targeted amount, depending on the Company's actual net sales and
operating income before income taxes compared to the target levels.
**EXHIBIT12.2**

 

**Hospitality Properties Trust**

**Computation of Ratio of Earnings to CombinedFixed Charges and Preferred Distributions**

**(in thousands, except ratio amounts)**

 
| ** **                                                               | ** ** | **Year Ended December 31,** | ** ** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|-----------------------------|------------|
| ** **                                                               | ** ** | **2005**                    | ** ** | **2004** | ** ** | **2003** | ** ** | **2002** | ** ** | **2001** | ** ** |
|                                                                     |       |                        |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Net income                                                               |       | $                           | 129,903    |   | $ | 127,091 |   | $ | 238,213 |   | $ | 142,202 |   | $ | 131,956 |   |
| Fixed  charges                                                           |       | 65,263                      |       | 50,393 |   | 44,536 |   | 42,424 |   | 41,312 |   |
| Adjusted earnings                                                        |       | $                           | 195,166    |   | $ | 177,484 |   | $ | 282,749 |   | $ | 184,626 |   | $ | 173,268 |   |
|                                                                     |       |                        |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Fixed charges and preferred distributions:                               |       |                        |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Interest on indebtedness and amortization  of deferred finance costs     |       | $                           | 65,263     |   | $ | 50,393 |   | $ | 44,536 |   | $ | 42,424 |   | $ | 41,312 |   |
| Preferred distributions                                                  |       | 7,656                       |       | 9,674 |   | 14,780 |   | 7,572 |   | 7,125 |   |
| Total combined fixed charges and preferred  distributions                |       | $                           | 72,919     |   | $ | 60,067 |   | $ | 59,316 |   | $ | 49,996 |   | $ | 48,437 |   |
|                                                                     |       |                        |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges  and preferred distributions |       | 2.68x                       |       | 2.95x |   | 4.77x |   | 3.69x |   | 3.58x |   |

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 11.1

                            DIGITAL MICROWAVE CORPORATION
                          COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                       (In thousands, except per share amounts)
                                     (Unaudited)



                                         Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
                                         September 30, 1997   September 30, 1997
                                         ------------------   ------------------
                                           1997     1996        1997       1996
                                          ------   ------      ------     ------
Primary:
    Weighted average shares outstanding   18,886   15,951      18,714     15,917
    Common stock equivalents               1,083      660       1,037        519
                                          ------   ------      ------     ------
                                          19,969   16,611      19,751     16,436
                                          ------   ------      ------     ------
                                          ------   ------      ------     ------
Fully Diluted:
    Weighted average shares outstanding  18,886    15,951      18,714     15,917
    Common stock equivalents              1,214       990       1,168        828
                                          ------   ------      ------     ------
                                         20,100    16,941      19,882     16,745
                                          ------   ------      ------     ------
                                          ------   ------      ------     ------
Earnings per share:          
    Primary                              $  .37    $  .13      $  .67     $  .20
                                          ------   ------      ------     ------
                                          ------   ------      ------     ------
    Fully Diluted                        $  .37    $  .13      $  .66     $  .19
                                          ------   ------      ------     ------
                                          ------   ------      ------     ------
§ 1136.210 Extensions of retention period due to litigation, claim, or audit. ( a ) *OMB guidance.* OMB guidance in: ( 1 ) 2 CFR 200.333(a) provides for an extended retention period for records involved in a litigation, claim, or audit that begins before the end of the standard 3-year retention period.
( 2 ) 2 CFR 200.333(b) provides that a recipient also is required to extend the retention period when a Federal awarding, cognizant, or oversight agency notifies it in writing to do so.
( b ) *DoD implementation.* ( 1 ) A DoD Component's general terms and conditions must provide for extended retention periods for records involved in a litigation, claim, or audit that begins before the end of the standard 3-year retention period, as described in 2 CFR 200.333(a).
( 2 ) ( i ) Other than the exception described in paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this section, DoD Components may not require recipients to extend the records retention period as described in 2 CFR 200.333(b).
( ii ) A DoD Component's general terms and conditions must extend the “retention period,” as that term is used in 2 CFR 200.344(a), to include the entire period during which recipients retain their records, even if that period extends beyond the standard 3-year retention period described in § 1136.205. That extension will enable disallowance of costs and recovery of funds based on an audit or other review of records a recipient elected to retain beyond the standard retention period, even if the audit or review began after the end of that retention period. Without that extension, the ability to disallow costs and recover funds would be limited by 2 CFR 200.344(a), which states that an agency must make any disallowance determination about a recipient's costs and notify the recipient within the record retention period.
( c ) *Award terms and conditions.* A DoD Component's general terms and conditions must use the wording appendix B to this part provides for Section B of OAR Article II.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT KAR AN L. ZOPATTI, Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. R ANC HO DOR

ADO HOM E OW

NER S ASSOC IATION a

nd THE PR

E SC OTT C OM PANIES, De fe nda

nts - Appe lle e s. No. 11-56447 D.C . No. 3:10-c v-01091-DM SW VG M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d State s Distric t C ourt for the Southe rn Distric t of C a lifornia D ana M . Sa

braw, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Argue d and Subm itte d June 3, 2013 Pa sa de n a , C a l ifornia B e fore : TR OTT a

nd W . FLETC HER , C i rc uit Judge s , a nd STEIN, Distric t Judge . ** Karan Zopa

tti a ppe a ls two orde rs of the distric t c ourt: one e xc luding the te stim ony of he r proffe re d e xpe rts a nd a nothe r gran t ing sum

m ary judgm e nt in favor of de fe nda

nts R an c ho Dora do Hom e owne rs Assoc iation a nd The Pre sc ott 

# FIL ED JUL 18 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S
. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public a t ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The Honora

ble Sidne y

H. Ste in, Distric t

Judge for the U.S. Distric t C ourt for the Southe rn Distric t of Ne w York, sitting by de signa tion.C om

pa nie s. W e have jurisdic tion pursua nt to 28 U.S.C . § 1291. This C ourt re vie ws a distric t c ourt’ s de c ision to e xc lude e xpe rt te s tim ony for a buse of disc re tion a

nd a de c ision gra

nting sum m ary judgm e nt de nov o . Se e Primiano v . C ook , 598 F.3d 558, 563 (9th C ir. 2010). W e have c onside re d a ll of pla intiff’ s argum e nts in fa

vor of re v e rsa l a

nd find the m

una va iling. 1 The distric t

c ourt did not a buse i ts disc re tion in e xc l uding pla intiff’ s e xpe rts a nd the re is no ge nuine issue of m a te ria l fa c t tha

t would pre c lude sum

m ary judgm e nt on a

ny of pla intiff’ s num e rous c la im s for re lie f. AFFIRM E D.

1 B e c a

use the pa rtie s’ brie fs a

nd e xc e rpts of re c ord we re file d unde r se a l , we d e c line to disc uss the m in de ta il. 2
Exhibit 10.1


Description of CryoLife, Inc. Performance-Based
Bonus Plan


On May 4, 2006, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of
CryoLife, Inc. (“CryoLife” or the “Company”) recommended, and the Board of
Directors adopted, a performance-based bonus plan for CryoLife’s corporate
officers, including its executive officers, as described below. The Company’s
executive officers are:


·                                          Steven
G. Anderson, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer;


·                                          David
M. Fronk, Vice President, Regulatory Affairs and Quality Assurance;


·                                          D.
Ashley Lee, Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer, and Chief
Financial Officer;


·                                          Gerald
B. Seery, Senior Vice President, Sales and Marketing;


·                                          Albert
E. Heacox, Ph.D., Senior Vice President, Research and Development;


The purpose of the performance-based bonus plan is to promote the
interests of CryoLife and its stockholders by providing key employees with
financial awards upon achievement of specified business objectives, and to help
attract and retain key employees by providing attractive compensation
opportunities linked to performance.


Bonuses will be payable based on a weighted formula, as follows:


·                                          50%,
based on the Company’s net income (loss) for 2006, excluding the effect of
stock compensation charges. A minimum loss threshold must be met before any
bonus can be earned under this measure.


·                                          30%,
based on the Company’s annual revenues from the sale of products and services.
A minimum threshold must be met before any bonus can be earned under this
measure.


·                                          20%,
based on Personal performance. In considering personal performance, the
Committee will consider the recommendations of management as well as its own
subjective determination.


Subject to meeting minimum performance thresholds, the executive officers
may earn bonuses as follows:


·                                          Mr.
Anderson, from 36% to 87% of base salary, with the target level set at 60%;


·                                          Mr.
Fronk, from 18% to 44% of base salary, with the target level set at 30%;


·                                          Mr.  Lee, from 36% to 87% of base salary, with the
target level set at 60%;


·                                          Mr.
Seery, from 15% to 59% of base salary, with the target level set at 35%; and


·                                          Mr.  Heacox, from 21% to 51% of base salary, with
the target level set at 35%.









 



If minimum performance thresholds are not met, no bonuses will be paid.


Additional performance bonuses of up to 15% of the participant’s base
salary will be earned if specified net loss/income targets are reached which
reflect performance improvements beyond that contemplated in the primary bonus
plan.
§ 2867.20 To whom does this part apply? This part and, through this part, pertinent portions of the OMB guidance in subparts A through I of 2 CFR part 180 (see table at 2 CFR 180.100(b)) apply to any— ( a ) Participant or principal in a “covered transaction” (sees subpart B of 2 CFR part 180 and the definition of “nonprocurement transaction” at 2 CFR 180.970 (as supplemented by subpart B of this part));
( b ) Respondent in a Department of Justice suspension or debarment action;
( c ) Department of Justice debarment or suspension official;
( d ) Department of Justice grants officer, agreements officer, or other official authorized to enter into any type of nonprocurement transaction that is a covered transaction.
§ 1.280 How must you submit prior notice? ( a ) You must submit the prior notice electronically to FDA. You must submit all prior notice information in the English language, except that an individual's name, the name of a company, and the name of a street may be submitted in a foreign language. All information, including the items listed in the previous sentence, must be submitted using the Latin (Roman) alphabet. Unless paragraph (c) of this section applies, you must submit prior notice through: ( 1 ) The U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Automated Broker Interface/Automated Commercial Environment/International Trade Data System (ABI/ACE/ITDS); or
( 2 ) The FDA PNSI at *https://www.access.fda.gov/ .* You must submit prior notice through the FDA Prior Notice System Interface (FDA PNSI) for articles of food imported or offered for import by international mail, and other transaction types that cannot be made through ABI/ACE/ITDS.
( b ) If a customhouse broker's or self-filer's system is not working or if the ABI/ACE/ITDS interface is not working, prior notice must be submitted through the FDA PNSI.
( c ) If FDA determines that FDA PNSI or the Operational and Administration System for Import Support (OASIS) is not working, FDA will post prominent notification and instructions at *https://www.access.fda.gov*—see log-in page. FDA will accept prior notice submissions in the format it deems appropriate during the system(s) outage.
[73 FR 66402, Nov. 7, 2008, as amended at 82 FR 15629, Mar. 30, 2017; 85 FR 50782, Aug. 18, 2020]
Exhibit 10.2


AMENDMENT


THIS AMENDMENT is
made as of the 31st day of July 2006 to the Employment Agreement between Roger
Jeffs, Ph.D. (“Executive”) and United Therapeutics Corporation dated November
29, 2000, as previously amended (the “Agreement”).


WHEREAS, the
parties desire to amend the Agreement as provided below.


NOW THEREFORE, for
good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereby amend the Agreement as follows:


1.  Term of the Agreement.  The first sentence of Section
10(c) of the Agreement presently provides as follows:


Executive agrees not to accept employment from, nor
render services in any capacity for, nor have any other business relationships
with, nor engage in any business activity in which it would be useful or
helpful to Executive or others with whom he is associated for Executive to use
or disclose Confidential Information of the Company with, a person or entity
engaged in a business located anywhere in the world which directly competes
with the Company’s then existing or planned business a period of one (1) year
following Executive’s last receipt of compensation from the Company, whether
the termination of Executive’s employment by either party was with or without
Cause.


In order to increase the term of Executive’s non-competition agreement
with United Therapeutics Corporation, the foregoing first sentence of Section 10(c) shall be replaced in
its entirety with the following provision:


Executive agrees not to accept employment from, nor
render services in any capacity for, nor have any other business relationships
with, nor engage in any business activity in which it would be useful or
helpful to Executive or others with whom he is associated for Executive to use
or disclose Confidential Information of the Company with, a person or entity
engaged in a business located anywhere in the world which directly competes
with the Company’s then existing or planned business a period of two (2) years
following Executive’s last receipt of compensation from the Company, whether
the termination of Executive’s employment by either party was with or without
Cause.


2.  Effect.  No other provisions of the Agreement shall be
affected by this Amendment, and all other provisions of the Agreement shall remain
in full force and effect.


In witness
whereof, the parties have executed this Amendment effective as of the date
first written above.


 


	
  

  	
   

  	
  UNITED THERAPEUTICS
  CORPORATION

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ Roger Jeffs

  	
   

  	
  /s/ Alyssa Friedrich

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Roger Jeffs,
  Ph.D.

  	
   

  	
  Alyssa Friedrich
#### § 707.9 Drug testing as a result of an occurrence.

When there is an occurrence which is required to be reported to DOE by the contractor, under contract provisions incorporating applicable DOE Orders, rules, and regulations, it may be necessary to test individuals in testing designated positions, or individuals with unescorted access to the control areas of the DOE reactors listed in § 707.7(c), for the use of illegal drugs, if such individuals could have caused or contributed to the conditions which caused the occurrence. For an occurrence requiring immediate notification or reporting as required by applicable DOE Orders, rules, and regulations, the contractor will require testing as soon as possible after the occurrence but within 24 hours of the occurrence, unless DOE determines that it is not feasible to do so. For other occurrences requiring notifications to DOE as required by applicable DOE Orders, rules, and regulations, the contractor may require testing.
PGI 207.470 Statutory requirements.       The contracting officer should obtain additional information on the definition of “substantial termination liability” by contacting the servicing legal adviser.    **Parent topic:** PGI 207.4 -EQUIPMENT LEASE OR PURCHASE
### Satellite image maps of Pakistan

By: Water Resources Division, U.S. Geological Survey

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/fs10997

#### Links

- More information:  **USGS Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract
Order entered September 17, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00521-CR

GREGORY ALLEN ROBINSON, JR, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F13-34479-R

ORDER

On August 12, 2014, this Court ordered the trial court to prepare and file a certification of 

appellant’s right to appeal. The Court has determined that the certification was signed by the 

trial court on August 13, 2014, but has not yet been forwarded to this Court by the Dallas County 

District Clerk.

Accordingly, we ORDER Gary Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk, to file a 

supplemental clerk’s record containing the August 13, 2014 certification of appellant’s right to 

appeal within TEN DAYS of the date of this order.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the 

Honorable Mark Stoltz, Presiding Judge, 265th Judicial District Court; Gary Fitzsimmons, Dallas 

County District Clerk; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE