alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 973

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 28, 2006.

Whereas the financial planning process can play a vital role 

in helping workers achieve financial independence by empowering them to identify and manage realistic financial 

objectives and meet the financial challenges that arise at 

every stage of life; 

Whereas all individuals in the United States can improve 

their quality of life by securing competent, objective, and 

comprehensive financial advice to assist them in attaining 

their financial goals; 

Whereas 2 surveys released in 2006 by the Consumer Federation of America and the Financial Planning Association revealed that 77 percent of financial planners think 

it is very important for Americans to understand what 

net personal wealth is, but only 49 percent of Americans 

know what constitutes this wealth—financial assets plus 

home equity and other tangible assets minus consumer 

debts; 

Whereas, in the past year, proclamations have been issued in 

numerous States and the District of Columbia recognizing the importance of the financial planning process in 

meeting the goal of financial independence and other 

long-term financial objectives; and 
2

•HRES 973 EH 

Whereas the Financial Planning Association has designated 

the week beginning October 2, 2006, as ‘‘Financial Planning Week’’: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) encourages Americans to observe ‘‘Financial 

Planning Week’’ with appropriate programs and activities; 

(2) supports the goals and ideals of ‘‘Financial 

Planning Week’’; 

(3) recognizes the significant impact that sound financial planning can have on securing financial independence and achieving life’s goals and dreams; and 

(4) acknowledges and commends the millions of 

families across the United States, as well as the financial 

planning profession, for their adherence and dedication 

to the financial planning process. 

Attest:

Clerk.
```

[House Report 106-766]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

106th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     106-766

======================================================================

 
WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 
 4810, THE MARRIAGE TAX PENALTY ELIMINATION RECONCILIATION ACT OF 2000

                                _______
                                

   July 19, 2000.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

Ms. Pryce of Ohio, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 559]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 559, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                summary of provisions of the resolution

    The resolution waives all points of order against the 
conference report to accompany H.R. 4810, the Marriage Tax 
Penalty Elimination Reconciliation Act of 2000, and against its 
consideration. The rule further provides that the conference 
report shall be considered as read. Finally, the rule lays 
House Resolution 556 on the table.

                                

```
Shawn Ghose/R6/USEPA/US To Arnold Ondarza/R6/USEPA/US@EPA, James 

Turner/R6/USEPA/US@EPA 

07/13/2007 01:28 PM ^^ 

bcc 

Subject Fw: Rogers Road NPL Map 

P.S. Rogers Road with correct legal descnption 

Forwarded by Shawn Ghose/R6/USEPA/US on G7/13/2007 01:24 PM —-

Jeff 

1 h Danlelson/R6/USEPA/US To Shawn Ghose/R6/USEPA/US@EPA 

's^ ^ 07/13/2007 01:10 PM cc 

Subject Rogers Road NPL Map 

The paper copies should be done in a few minutes, I'll leave them on Melody's guest chair. 

Jeff ^ 

,AR_Roge[sRdLandfillpdf 

Jeffery Danielson 

Lockheed Martin 

EPA Region 6 - GIS Support Team 

214.665.8559 

danielson.jeff@epa.gov 

002371
NPL Boundary Review 

Rogers Road Municipal Landfill 

ARD981055809 

Please review the NPL boundary above and note modifications 

as needed, Superfund source maps, site descriptions, and aerials 

have been used to determine the boundary atx)ve, however it will 

be considered a draft boundary until it has been approved 

by an RPM or other superfund official. 

Acreage listed was calculated for the polygon(s) shown above and 

rounded to the nearest whole number. It may not reflect actual 

acreage of the site and is given for informational purposes only. 

740 1,110 Z " . :, EPA Region 6 

f! Superfund 

>' 02/13/2007 

20070607ML13 

N 

A 

002372
#### § 417.530 Where can I find SAM Exclusions?

You may access SAM Exclusions through the internet, currently at *https://www.sam.gov.*
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT DAVID WAYNE WOODRING, Petitioner

v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, BUREAU OF DRIVER LICENSING, Respondent : : : : : : : : : : : : : No. 51 MAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Commonwealth Court

DAVID WAYNE WOODRING, Petitioner

v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, BUREAU OF DRIVER LICENSING, Respondent : : : : : : : : : : : : : No. 52 MAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER
PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 28th day of August, 2014, the Petition for All owance of Appeal is DENIED

.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 996 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 996

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    September 13, 2006.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order 
without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the 
resolution (H. Res. 994) expressing the sense of the House of Representatives on 
the fifth anniversary of the terrorist attacks launched against the United 
States on September 11, 2001. The resolution shall be considered as read. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the resolution and preamble 
to final adoption without intervening motion or demand for division of the 
question except: (1) four hours of debate equally divided and controlled by the 
Majority Leader and Minority Leader or their designees; and (2) one motion to 
recommit which may not contain instructions.
    Sec. 2. During consideration of House Resolution 994 pursuant to this 
resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the Chair 
may postpone further consideration of the resolution to a time designated by the 
Speaker.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 36

 38

 40

 42

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

05/31

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 31 May 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.44 N 77.04 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★

■

■

■

■

★

●

●

●

●

★

●

●

● ●
# EUR-Lex - 31990L0488 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31990L0488

**Council Directive 90/488/EEC of 17 September 1990 amending Directive 87/404/EEC on the harmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to simple pressure vessels **

*
Official Journal L 270 , 02/10/1990 P. 0025 - 0025 Finnish special edition: Chapter 13 Volume 19 P. 0250 Swedish special edition: Chapter 13 Volume 19 P. 0250 *

*****

COUNCIL DIRECTIVE

of 17 September 1990

amending Directive 87/404/EEC on the harmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to simple pressure vessels

(90/488/EEC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, and in particular Article 100a thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission (1),

In cooperation with the European Parliament (2),

Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee (3),

Whereas Directive 87/404/EEC (4) provides for the complete harmonization of the standards for simple pressure vessels manufactured in series;

Whereas in the absence of harmonized standards Directive 87/404/EEC requires EC-type examination of the vessels in question; whereas those standards will not be available by the date of application of the Directive;

Whereas Directive 87/404/EEC has not provided for a transitional period during which it would be permitted to market stocks of vessels manufactured in accordance with national rules still applicable before that Directive takes effect;

Whereas manufacturers must have the time needed to apply the EC-type examination procedure and it is necessary to set a transitional period to allow vessels in stock to be marketed,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:

Article 1

The following is hereby added to Article 18 (1) of Directive 87/404/EEC:

Member States shall, for the period up to 1 July 1992, permit the placing on the market and/or in service of vessels conforming to the rules in force in their territories before the date of application of this Directive.'

Article 2

Member States shall adopt the provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by 1 July 1991. They shall forthwith inform the Commission thereof,

Article 3

This Directive is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 September 1990.

For the Council

The President

P. ROMITA

(1) OJ No C 13, 19. 1. 1990, p. 7.

(2) OJ No C 149, 18. 6. 1990, p. 145 and Decision of 12 September 1990 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

(3) OJ No C 168, 10. 7. 1990, p. 2.

(4) OJ No L 220, 8. 8. 1987, p. 48.
| (logo) WELLS   

           FARGO | Corporate Trust  Services

 

MAC R1204-010

9062 Old Annapolis Road

Columbia, MD 21045

 

Tel: 410-884-2000

Fax: 410-715-2380 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

                

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp. 

270 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10017

 

 

 

RE:  Annual Statement of Compliance

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator for the West County Center Whole Loan (in such capacities, “Wells Fargo”), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2014  (the “reporting period”):

 

 

·         A review of Wells Fargo’s activities during the reporting period and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement(s) listed on Schedule A hereto (the “Servicing Agreement(s)”) has been made under my supervision; and

 

·         To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all material respects throughout the reporting period, except as noted on Schedule B.

 

 

 

March 20, 2015

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

Brian Smith

Vice President

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

To:  J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp.

Schedule A

 

 

List of Servicing Agreement(s) and Series

 

 

Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of December 1, 2012, by and among J.P. MORGAN CHASE COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP., as Depositor, MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, A DIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, as Special Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator and Trustee, and PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Senior Trust Advisor relating to the Series JPMCC 2012-LC9 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates relating to the West County Center Whole Loan, a pari passu portion of which is included in Series JPMCC 2013-C10.

 

 

To:  J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp.

Schedule B

 

 

Material Non-Compliance with Servicing Obligations

 

Not Applicable
**Exhibit 32****SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**     I, Thian Hoo Tan, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Komag, Incorporated onForm 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July 3, 2005 fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained insuch Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of Komag, Incorporated.        BY: /s/ Thian Hoo Tan            Thian Hoo Tan  Chief Executive Officer     I, Kathleen A. Bayless, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Komag, Incorporated onForm 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July 3, 2005 fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained insuch 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of Komag, Incorporated.        BY: /s/ Kathleen A. Bayless            Kathleen A. Bayless  Chief Financial Officer     This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemedfiled by Komag, Incorporated for purposes of Section 18 of the Security Exchange Act of 1934, asamended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toKomag, Incorporated and will be retained by Komag, Incorporated and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Editorial Note on Part 112
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 112 appear at 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 112.5 Which farms are eligible for a qualified exemption and associated modified requirements based on average monetary value of all food sold and direct farm marketing? ( a ) A farm is eligible for a qualified exemption and associated modified requirements in a calendar year if: ( 1 ) During the previous 3-year period preceding the applicable calendar year, the average annual monetary value of the food (as defined in § 112.3) the farm sold directly to qualified end-users (as defined in § 112.3) during such period exceeded the average annual monetary value of the food the farm sold to all other buyers during that period; and
( 2 ) The average annual monetary value of all food (as defined in § 112.3) the farm sold during the 3-year period preceding the applicable calendar year was less than $500,000, adjusted for inflation.
( b ) For the purpose of determining whether the average annual monetary value of all food sold during the 3-year period preceding the applicable calendar year was less than $500,000, adjusted for inflation, the baseline year for calculating the adjustment for inflation is 2011.
[80 FR 74547, Nov. 27, 2015, as amended at 84 FR 12490, Apr. 2, 2019]
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear at 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 117.160 Validation. ( a ) You must validate that the preventive controls identified and implemented in accordance with § 117.135 are adequate to control the hazard as appropriate to the nature of the preventive control and its role in the facility's food safety system.
( b ) The validation of the preventive controls: ( 1 ) Must be performed (or overseen) by a preventive controls qualified individual: ( i ) ( A ) Prior to implementation of the food safety plan; or
( B ) When necessary to demonstrate the control measures can be implemented as designed: ( 1 ) Within 90 calendar days after production of the applicable food first begins; or
( 2 ) Within a reasonable timeframe, provided that the preventive controls qualified individual prepares (or oversees the preparation of) a written justification for a timeframe that exceeds 90 calendar days after production of the applicable food first begins;
( ii ) Whenever a change to a control measure or combination of control measures could impact whether the control measure or combination of control measures, when properly implemented, will effectively control the hazards; and
( iii ) Whenever a reanalysis of the food safety plan reveals the need to do so;
( 2 ) Must include obtaining and evaluating scientific and technical evidence (or, when such evidence is not available or is inadequate, conducting studies) to determine whether the preventive controls, when properly implemented, will effectively control the hazards; and
( c ) You do not need to validate: ( 1 ) The food allergen controls in § 117.135(c)(2);
( 2 ) The sanitation controls in § 117.135(c)(3);
( 3 ) The recall plan in § 117.139;
( 4 ) The supply-chain program in subpart G of this part; and
( 5 ) Other preventive controls, if the preventive controls qualified individual prepares (or oversees the preparation of) a written justification that validation is not applicable based on factors such as the nature of the hazard, and the nature of the preventive control and its role in the facility's food safety system.
#### § 600.315 Intangible property.

If the DOS obtains research data solely in response to a FOIA request, the DOS may charge the requester fees consistent with the FOIA and applicable DOS regulations and policies.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

MARIO ACCOMANDO, 

Appellant, 

vs. 

GEORGANN ROSE ACCOMANDO, 

Respondent. 

No. 83716 

FILED 

DEC 13 2021 

ELIZABETH A. BROWN 

CLERK OF SUPREME COURT 

BY •\1 0-4-4-14-41k./ DEPUTY CLERX 0 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order awarding 

temporary spousal support and making other temporary orders. Eighth 

Judicial District Court, Family Court Division, Clark County; Amy Mastin, 

Judge. 

Review of the notice of appeal and other documents before this court 

reveals a jurisdictional defect. The challenged order is not appealable. See 

Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 

(2013) (this court "may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court 

rule); see generally In re Ternporary Custody of Five Minor Children, 105 

Nev. 441, 777 P.2d 901 (1989) (stating that no appeal may be taken from a 

temporary order subject to periodic mandatory review). Accordingly, this 

court 

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED. 

Cadish 

Herndon 

el) - 36 
cc: Hon. Amy Mastin, District Judge, Family Court Division 

Mario Accomando 

Reza Athari & Associates, PLLC. 

Eighth District Court Clerk
07/23/2010 10:36 FAX 2024G35142 FAA ^ OMS @001/001 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 

In the Matte r of: DARBY AVIATION. IN C 

Docket No. CP08SO0026 

bDMSNo.FAA-2008-1192 

Served: July 23, 2010 

EXTENSION OF TIME 

Administrative Law Judge Isaac D. Benkiii served a written initial decision on 

June 3, 2010, finding ihat Respondent Darby Aviation, Inc., did not violate 14 C.F.R. 

§ 135.293(a), as alleged in the complaint, and dismissing the case •with prejudice. The 

FAA filed a timely notice of appeal from the written initial decision. Under 14 C.F.R. 

§§ 13.233(c)and 13.21 l(eX the FAA's appeal brief is due no later than July 28, 2010, 

unless an extension of time is granted. 

By letter dated July 23, 2010, the agency attorney requested an extension of lime 

until Augusi 6, 2010, in which to perfect the agency's appeal by filing an appeal brief, 

llie agency attorney represented that Respondent's counsel agreed to an extension oiup 

to 30 days. 

In light of the foregoing, the FAA's request for an extension of time in which to 

file its appeal brief is granted under 14 C.F.R. § 13.233(c)(1). The FAA's appeal brief, 

therefore, is due to be filed on or before August 6,2010. 

J. RANDOLPH BABBITT 

ADMINISTRATOR 

Federal Aviation Administration 

. •-.•• : 

U J 

y* 

„....,.-

* • a i 

K..O 

-Q 

C3 

-X-L; 

r,-j 

.,' i ; : 

1 . ,r- , > 

- H- O 

-^-'c:> 

rr;) • =r H 

> » • 

- M 

CD 

.-—. 

?1CKI S. dS^€iN ' 

Manager, Adjudication Branch 

' Issued under authority delegated to the ChierCounsel and the Assistant Chief Counsel for 

Litigation by Memorandum dated October 27, 1992, under 49 U.S.C. § 322(b) and 14 C.F.R. 

§ 13.202 {see 57 Fed. Reg. 58,280 (1992)) and redelegatcd by the A.s.fisiant Chief Counsel for 

Litigation to the Manager, Adjudication Branch, by Memorandum dated August 6, 1993.
#### Dorothy Pass, as Administratrix of the Estate of Samuel Sherwin, Deceased, Appellant, v. Beatrice Spirt, Also Known as Billie Spirt, Respondent.

Motion for a stay pending appeal denied, without costs (see CPLR 5519, subd. [a], par. 4). Herlihy, P. J., Reynolds, Staley, Jr., Greenblott and Cooke, JJ., concur.
# EUR-Lex - 31993D0081 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31993D0081

**93/81/Euratom, ECSC, EEC: Decision amending the Act concerning the election of the representatives of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage, annexed to Council Decision 76/787/ECSC, EEC, Euratom of 20 September 1976 **

*
Official Journal L 033 , 09/02/1993 P. 0015 - 0015 *

DECISION amending the Act concerning the election of the representatives of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage, annexed to Council Decision 76/787/ECSC, EEC, Euratom of 20 September 1976

(93/81/Euratom, ECSC, EEC) THE COUNCIL, Having regard to Article 21 (3) of the Treaty establishing the European Coal and Steel Community,

Having regard to Article 138 (3) of the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Article 108 (3) of the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community,

Having regard to the resolution of the European Parliament of 10 June 1992, and in particular point 4 thereof (1),

Intending to give effect to the conclusions of the European Council in Edinburgh on 11 and 12 December 1992 concerning the allocation of the seats of the European Parliament, as from 1994, to take account of the unification of Germany and enlargement in prospect,

HAS LAID DOWN the following amendments to the Act which is annexed to Council Decision 76/787/ECSC, EEC, Euratom of 20 September 1976 (2) and which was amended by Article 10 of the Act of Accession of Spain and Portugal to the European Communities, and recommends them to the Member States for adoption in accordance with their respective constitutional requirements,

Article 1

Article 2 of the Act concerning the election of the representatives of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage, which is annexed to Council Decision 76/787/ECSC, EEC, Euratom of 20 September 1976 and which was amended by Article 10 of the Act of Accession of Spain and Portugal to the European Communities, shall be replaced by the following:

'Article 2

The number of representatives elected in each Member State shall be as follows:

Belgium 25

Denmark 16

Germany 99

Greece 25

Spain 64

France 87

Ireland 15

Italy 87

Luxembourg 6

Netherlands 31

Portugal 25

United Kingdom 87.'

Article 2

The Member States shall notify the Secretary-General of the Council of the European Communities without delay of the completion of the procedures necessary in accordance with their respective constitutional requirements for the adoption of the provisions of Article 1.

The said provisions shall enter into force on the first day of the month following receipt of the last of these notifications. They shall be applied for the first time at the elections to the European Parliament to be held in 1994.

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

It shall enter into force on the day of its publication.

Done at Brussels, 1 February 1993.

For the Council

The President

N. HELVEG PETERSEN

(1) OJ No C 176, 13. 7. 1992, p. 72.

(2) OJ No L 278, 8. 10. 1976.