alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 106
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 106 appear at 81 FR 49895, July 29, 2016.

§ 106.140 Submission concerning a change in infant formula that may adulterate the product. ( a ) When a manufacturer makes a change in the formulation or processing of the formula that may affect whether the formula is adulterated under section 412(a) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 350a(a)), the manufacturer shall, before the first processing of such formula, make a submission to the Food and Drug Administration at the address given in § 106.110(a). An original and two copies shall be submitted.
( b ) The submission shall include: ( 1 ) The name and physical form of the infant formula (i.e., powder, ready-to-feed, or concentrate);
( 2 ) ( i ) An explanation of why the change in formulation or processing may affect whether the formula is adulterated; and
( ii ) What steps will be taken to ensure that, before the formula is introduced into interstate commerce, the formula will not be adulterated; and
( 3 ) A statement that the submission complies with § 106.120(b)(3), (b)(4), (b)(5), and (b)(6). When appropriate, a statement to the effect that the information required by § 106.120(b)(3), (b)(4), (b)(5), or (b)(6) has been provided to the Agency previously and has not been affected by the changes that are the subject of the current submission, together with the identification number assigned by the Agency to the relevant infant formula submission, may be provided in lieu of such statement.
( c ) The submission shall not constitute notice under section 412 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act unless it complies fully with paragraph (b) of this section, and the information that it contains is set forth in a manner that is readily understandable. The Agency will notify the manufacturer if the notice is not adequate because it does not meet the requirements of section 412(d)(3) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

________________________ No. 07 - 14 - 00346 - CV

________________________ JANE T. DURHAM , APPELLANT

V. MARGARET L. DURHAM, NANCY C. STEWART, DAVID DURHAM,

AND BARBARA FLOURNOY , APPELLEE S On Appeal from the 237th District Court Lubbock County, Texas Trial Court No. 2013 - 509,100 ; Honorable Leslie Hatch , Presiding



### September 11 , 2015 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ. Pending before the court is a joint mo tion to dismiss this appeal following the death of A ppellant , Jane T. Durham . In response, the c ourt ordered A ppellant’s counsel to show authority to dismiss the appeal on behalf of Ms. Durham’s estate . Durham v. Durham , No. 07 - 1 4 - 00346 - CV, 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 8720 (Tex. App. — Amarillo August 14, 2015, order). T he c ourt has now considered the Amended Joint Motion for2

Dismissal of Appeal and is sat isfied that the executors of Ms. Durham’ s estate have authorized dismiss al of the appeal . Accordingly, w ithout pass ing on the merits of the appeal, the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed. See T EX . R. A PP . P . 42.1(a)(1). Having dismissed this appeal upon the joint motion to dismiss , no motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith . Per Curiam
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 6 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 6

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                       January 3, 2017.
    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are hereby, elected to 
the following standing committees of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Agriculture: Mr. Conaway, Chair.
    Committee on Appropriations: Mr. Frelinghuysen, Chair.
    Committee on Armed Services: Mr. Thornberry, Chair.
    Committee on the Budget: Mrs. Black, Chair.
    Committee on Education and the Workforce: Ms. Foxx, Chair.
    Committee on Energy and Commerce: Mr. Walden, Chair.
    Committee on Ethics: Mrs. Brooks of Indiana, Chair, Mr. Meehan, Mr. Gowdy, 
Mr. Marchant, and Mr. Lance.
    Committee on Financial Services: Mr. Hensarling, Chair.
    Committee on Foreign Affairs: Mr. Royce of California, Chair.
    Committee on Homeland Security: Mr. McCaul, Chair.
    Committee on House Administration: Mr. Harper, Chair, Mr. Rodney Davis of 
Illinois, Mrs. Comstock, Mr. Walker, Mr. Smith of Nebraska, and Mr. Loudermilk.
    Committee on the Judiciary: Mr. Goodlatte, Chair.
    Committee on Natural Resources: Mr. Bishop of Utah, Chair.
    Committee on Oversight and Government Reform: Mr. Chaffetz, Chair.
    Committee on Rules: Mr. Sessions, Chair, Mr. Cole, Mr. Woodall, Mr. Burgess, 
Mr. Collins of Georgia, Mr. Byrne, Mr. Newhouse, Mr. Buck, and Ms. Cheney.
    Committee on Science, Space, and Technology: Mr. Smith of Texas, Chair.
    Committee on Small Business: Mr. Chabot, Chair.
    Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure: Mr. Shuster, Chair.
    Committee on Veterans' Affairs: Mr. Roe of Tennessee, Chair.
    Committee on Ways and Means: Mr. Brady of Texas, Chair.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit 

__________________________ 

RICHARD REBSTOCK, 

Claimant-Appellant, 

v. 

ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS 

AFFAIRS, 

Respondent-Appellee. 

__________________________ 

2012-7169 

__________________________ 

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for 

Veterans Claims in 12-1171, Judge Robert N. Davis. 

__________________________ 

ON MOTION 

__________________________ 

O R D E R 

Richard Rebstock moves for an out of time extension 

to file his reply brief. The Government does not oppose 

the motion. 

 Upon consideration thereof, 

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

Case: 12-7169 Document: 24 Page: 1 Filed: 12/27/2012
RICHARD REBSTOCK v. SHINSEKI 2

Rebstock’s motion is granted. The reply brief is accepted as filed. 

FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

 Jan Horbaly 

 Clerk 

s23 

Case: 12-7169 Document: 24 Page: 2 Filed: 12/27/2012
#### § 1132.4 Organization of this part.

(a) The content of this part is organized into subparts and associated appendices.

(1) Each subpart provides direction to DoD Components on how to construct one article of general terms and conditions for grants and cooperative agreements.

(2) For each subpart, there is a corresponding appendix with standard wording for terms and conditions of the article addressed by the subpart. Terms and conditions address rights and responsibilities of the Federal Government and recipients.

(b) A DoD Component must use the wording provided in each appendix in accordance with the direction in the corresponding subpart. That direction may permit DoD Components to vary from the standard wording in some situations.

(c) Table 1 shows which article of general terms and conditions may be found in each of appendices A through C to this part (with the associated direction to DoD Components in Subparts A through C, respectively):

| In . . . | You will find terms and conditions specifying recipients' rights and responsibilities related to . . . | That would appear in an award within PROC Article . . . |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Appendix A | Procurement standards for States | I. |
| Appendix B | Procurement standards for institutions of higher education, nonprofit organizations, local governments, and Indian tribes | II. |
| Appendix C | Contract provisions for recipient procurements | III. |

Table 1 to paragraph (c)
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 885 Reported in House (RH)]







                                                 House Calendar No. 200
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 885

                          [Report No. 109-517]

   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5638) to amend the 
 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the unified credit against 
 the estate tax to an exclusion equivalent of $5,000,000 and to repeal 
the sunset provision for the estate and generation-skipping taxes, and 
                          for other purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 21, 2006

 Mr. Hastings of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, reported the 
  following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and 
                         ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5638) to amend the 
 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the unified credit against 
 the estate tax to an exclusion equivalent of $5,000,000 and to repeal 
the sunset provision for the estate and generation-skipping taxes, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved,  That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order without intervention of any point of order to consider in the 
House the bill (H.R. 5638) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
to increase the unified credit against the estate tax to an exclusion 
equivalent of $5,000,000 and to repeal the sunset provision for the 
estate and generation-skipping taxes, and for other purposes. The bill 
shall be considered as read. The amendment printed in the report of the 
Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution shall be considered as 
adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
bill, as amended, to final passage without intervening motion except: 
(1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman 
and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means; and (2) 
one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
                                                 House Calendar No. 200

109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 885

                          [Report No. 109-517]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5638) to amend the 
 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the unified credit against 
 the estate tax to an exclusion equivalent of $5,000,000 and to repeal 
the sunset provision for the estate and generation-skipping taxes, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 21, 2006

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
yearID sourceTypeID sourceTypePopulation

2021 11 22330.68299

2021 21 468459.7133

2021 31 150754.8696

2021 32 50364.63874

2021 41 659.0815059

2021 42 310.0330641

2021 43 4386.231621

2021 51 141.8195445

2021 52 17967.94431

2021 53 2835.541027

2021 54 4286.910406

2021 61 3166.218733

2021 62 4555.195208
#### In the Matter of Williams Manor Associates et al., Respondents-Appellants, v City of Mount Vernon et al., Appellants-Respondents. (And 21 Other Proceedings.) In the Matter of Richnon Realty Corp., Respondent-Appellant, v City of Mount Vernon et al., Appellants-Respondents. In

In 23 proceedings pursuant to article 7 of the Real Property Tax Law to judicially review assessments on the real property of the respective petitioners, the parties cross-appeal from four orders of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, two dated April 19, 1979, which, *inter alia,*denied motions to dismiss the proceedings, and two dated July 12, 1979, which denied motions to reargue the prior orders. Appeal from orders dated July 12, 1979 dismissed, without costs oi^ disbursements. Appeals do not lie from orders denying reargument. Orders dated April 19, 1979 modified by deleting therefrom the provisions which denied the motions to dismiss the proceedings. As so modified, orders affirmed, without costs or disbursements, and matters are remitted to.the Supreme Court, Westchester County, for further proceedings consistent herewith. In our opinion the motions to dismiss the instant proceedings could not fairly be determined without a hearing being held to determine whether the notice and posting of filing of the final assessment roll complied with law and, if so, whether the City of Mount Vernon was estopped from asserting that the proceedings were untimely instituted (see *Matter of W. T. Grant Co. v Smith,*Supreme Ct, Westchester County, March 20, 1974 [McCullough, J.], affd 48 AD2d 773; 22 NYCRR 780.23; CPLR 410, 2218). We find no merit in petitioners’ special franchise argument. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Titone and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
#### § 901.30 What policies and procedures must I follow?

The DOE policies and procedures that you must follow are the policies and procedures specified in each applicable section of the OMB guidance in subparts A through I of 2 CFR part 180 and any supplemental policies and procedures set forth in this part.
PGI 241.205 Separate contracts.

(1) Definitions. As used in this section—

“Definite term contract” means a contract for utility services for a definite period of not less than

one nor more than ten years.

“Indefinite term contract” means a month-to-month contract for utility services that may be

terminated by the Government upon proper notice.

(2) Requests for proposals shall state the anticipated service period in terms of months or years. If

the period extends beyond the current fiscal year, evaluate offers of incentives for a definite term

contract.

(3) The solicitation may permit offerors the choice of proposing on the basis of—

(i) A definite term not to exceed the anticipated service period; or

(ii) An indefinite term contract.

(4) If the expected service period is less than the current fiscal year, the solicitation shall be on the

basis of an indefinite term contract.

(5) Contracts for utility services for leased premises shall identify the lease document on the face of

the contract.

(6) Use an indefinite term utility service contract when it is considered to be in the Government's

best interest to—

(i) Have the right to terminate on a 30-day (or longer) notice. A notice of up to one year may be

granted by an installation if needed to obtain a more favorable rate, more advantageous conditions,

or for other valid reasons; or

(ii) Grant the supplier the right to terminate the contract when of benefit to the Government in the

form of lower rates, larger discounts, or more favorable terms and conditions.

Parent topic: PGI 241.2 - ACQUIRING UTILITY SERVICES
§ 871.1 National security exemption. ( a ) The following DOE air shipments of plutonium are considered as being made for the purposes of national security within the meaning of section 502(2) of Public Law 94-187: ( 1 ) Shipments made in support of the development, production, testing, sampling, maintenance, repair, modification, or retirement of atomic weapons or devices;
( 2 ) Shipments made pursuant to international agreements for cooperation for mutual defense purposes; and
( 3 ) Shipments necessary to respond to an emergency situation involving a possible threat to the national security.
( b ) The Deputy Administrator for Defense Programs may authorize air shipments falling within paragraph (a)(1) of this section, on a case-by-case basis: *Provided*, That the Deputy Administrator for Defense Programs determines that such shipment is required to be made by aircraft either because: ( 1 ) The delay resulting from using ground transportation methods would have serious adverse impact upon a national security requirement;
( 2 ) Safeguards or safety considerations dictate the use of air transportation;
( 3 ) The nature of the item to be shipped necessitates the use of air transportation in order to avoid possible damage which may be expected from other available transportation environments; or
( 4 ) The nature of the item being shipped necessitates rapid shipment by air in order to preserve the chemical, physical, or isotopic properties of the item.
The Deputy Administrator for Defense Programs may also authorize air shipments falling within paragraph (a)(2) of this section in all cases since the inherent time delays of surface transportation for such shipments are considered unacceptable. The Deputy Administrator for Defense Programs may also authorize air shipments falling within paragraph (a)(3) of this section in cases where failure to make shipments by air could jeopardize the national security of the United States. [42 FR 48332, Sept. 23, 1977, as amended at 71 FR 68734, Nov. 28, 2006]
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1490 Prepped hy Charmelle Mathews



# Document

Number: 

# 5 ) IV-B- 5 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 8/4/200811:51:46

AM Sheet 5of 273

### P. 2 

# \v-8- S Meardon , Kennet h From : Sent : To : Subject : Susa n Cassidy[Mai l Hu b #3.RT P Pos t Office.STCassidy

] Tuesday , Januar

y29 , 2002 1:2

6 P M Kennet h Meardo n hour s o foperatio n Keit h calle d wit h som e hour s o f operation . Fo rARE , th e hour s ar e i n th e unclassifie d tri p report an d the yar e 610 0 fo rMassillo n an d Moun t Eaton . Fo r Ake ran d America n Standard , th e informatio n i n th e tri p report s was neve rdeclassified , bu t Keit h sai d th e 600 0 figur e w e hav e bee n usin g i s prett ygoo d fo rthos e facilities . TEXT.htm(810B )



## •FE B 2 7 l-Vj b EP AAI R DOCKE T
H. Res. 942

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 20, 2006.

Whereas in 1906, one hundred years ago, the people of Iran 

rose in a peaceful democratic revolution against arbitrary, despotic rulers; 

Whereas the people of Iran chose to confront these rulers 

with peaceful assemblies of thousands of people in the 

public spaces of Iran until these rulers received their demands; 

Whereas these rulers bowed to the wishes of the people on 

August 5, 1906, and issued a decree for the convocation 

of a freely elected assembly, the Majles, to write a democratic constitution; 

Whereas the Iranian constitution, written pursuant to the decree of 1906, was a democratic instrument providing 

for—

(1) the establishment of an independent judiciary; 

(2) the establishment of an independent legislature 

with members directly elected by the people; 

(3) socio-political progress, including the separation 

of religion from the affairs of government; and 

(4) the commitment of the government to the territorial integrity of Iran;
2

•HRES 942 EH 

Whereas the maneuvering of the imperial powers and a fundamentalist clergy crushed the democratic aspirations 

represented in the constitution of 1906; 

Whereas the Iranian constitution of 1906 has nevertheless remained in the forefront of the aspirations of the Iranian 

people throughout decades of a long struggle towards 

progress, civil society, and democracy; 

Whereas those ideals were abolished by the clerical-led dictatorship of the Ayatollahs in 1979; and 

Whereas August 5, 2006, would be an appropriate day to recognize the centennial anniversary of the Iranian constitution of 1906: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) recognizes the centennial anniversary of the Iranian constitution of 1906; 

(2) is mindful of the democratic revolution of 1906 

that lead to the drafting of the Iranian constitution; and 

(3) expresses its profound hope that the people of 

Iran will once again enjoy a democratic government in 

the spirit of the Iranian constitution of 1906. 

Attest:

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 167 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 167

Supporting the designation of the week of February 26 to March 4, 2017, 
            as ``National Spinal CSF Leak Awareness Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 2, 2017

  Mr. Cartwright (for himself and Ms. Norton) submitted the following 
 resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Supporting the designation of the week of February 26 to March 4, 2017, 
            as ``National Spinal CSF Leak Awareness Week''.

Whereas spinal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, also known as intracranial 
        hypotension, is an important, disabling, underdiagnosed but treatable 
        cause of new onset headache;
Whereas cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) bathes and supports the brain and spinal cord;
Whereas when the connective tissue known as dura that holds CSF in around the 
        spinal cord has a hole or tear, the result is a loss of CSF volume;
Whereas the most common symptom is a disabling positional headache that is worse 
        when upright and improved when lying down;
Whereas spinal CSF leaks may cause a wide range of symptoms and serious 
        complications, including stroke, dementia, Parkinsonism, coma, and even 
        death;
Whereas the causes of spinal CSF leaks include those that arise from trauma or 
        medical procedures, as well as those that occur spontaneously;
Whereas the diagnosis is often missed or delayed due to low awareness by health 
        care providers, contributing to additional suffering;
Whereas the sensitivity of diagnostic imaging is currently inadequate to confirm 
        the diagnosis and/or locate the leak in many cases, which impacts 
        treatment options and outcomes;
Whereas current treatment options are limited to epidural patching procedures 
        and a range of neurosurgical procedures;
Whereas the incidence and prevalence of this disorder has been challenging to 
        study due to underdiagnosis;
Whereas funding for research of this disorder is lacking; and
Whereas greater awareness and understanding of this disorder are vital to ensure 
        the diagnosis, treatment, and best possible outcomes for patients: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the designation of ``National Spinal CSF Leak 
        Awareness Week''; and
            (2) recognizes the importance of understanding the impact 
        of this disorder.
                                 <all>
```