alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection with the accompanying amended Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB of Velocity Asset Management Inc. for the six months ended June 30, 2006,
I, John C. Kleinert, Chief Executive Officer of Velocity Asset Management, Inc.
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) such amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the six
months ended June 30, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) the information contained in such amended Quarterly Report
on Form 10-QSB for the six months ended June 30, 2006, fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Velocity
Asset Management, Inc.



                                       /s/ JOHN C. KLEINERT
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       John C. Kleinert
                                       Chief Executive Officer


November 24, 2006


                                       24
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGIONS 1445 ROSS AVENUE, SUITE 1200 DALLAS, TX 75202-2733



### Ms. Cecilia Williams Chief Air Quality Bureau New Mexico Environment Department P.O. Box 26110 Santa Fe, NM 87502-6110 Dear Hs. Williams: The invironment.al P.coLecl.iuiJ. Age·.:J.GY {EPA) :LC(:ei>.tcd**:r~aur** 

### letter of November 6, 1998, which submitted corrections to the New Mexico Administrative Code (NMAC). The corrections submitted included typographical and numbering errors, one of which was a correction to 20 NMAC 2.72

- Construction Permits, Section 502- Table 

## c. According to your November 6 letter, the table was inadvertently left out during reformatting from the Air Quality Control Regulations into the NMAC format. The EPA does not consider the table as part of the current State Implementation Plan (SIP). In subsequent conversations among our respective staff, we understand that it is not the Department's intention to amend the SIP to include Table 

## c. Based on this understanding, EPA intends to take no action on that portion of the November 6, 1998, submittal. Please confirm in writing that our understanding is correct. If I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely

Air Permits Section

Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov Recycled/Recyclable • Prtnled Wtlh Vegelable 08 Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 25% Postconsumer)GARYE. JOHNSON**GoW~mor**
Sandra Ely Air QualityBureau

Jole C. Luehrs U.S. EPA, Region 6 1445 Ross Ave., Suite 1200 Dallas, TX 75202-2733 DearMs. Luehrs: 

### State of 

## NewMexico 

## ENnRONMENTDEPARTIWENT HaroldRunnels Building /190St. Francis Drive, P.O. Druwer 26110 Santa Fe, New Mexico 87502-0110

May II, 1999 PETER MAGGIORE Secretary

Phone: (505) 827-1494 Fax: (505) 827-1523

I am responding to your letter ofApril 7, 1999, requesting clarification ofour November 6, 1998 submittal. At that time we had submitted several corrections to the New Mexico Administrative Code(NMAC) concerningourConstructionPennitrule, 20NMAC2.72. Someofthesecorrections werepart ofour State Implementation Plan (SIP), others were not. The Nov. 6, 1998 submittal did identify which corrections were part ofthe SIP (Attachment A ofthat submittal), but this letter will further clarify your questions about Table C in the air toxics portion of20 NMAC 2.72. Table Cis not part ofour SIP and wasonly senttd you for yourinformation sothatyou would have a complete copy ofthis rule. Ifyou should have any further questions regarding this change, please call Jim Nellessen ofmy staffat (505) 827-0048. Sincerely,

# :i5~~ Sandra Ely, Acting Bureau Chief

se:Jn
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. FDA-2010-N-0001]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        The meeting of the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee scheduled for February 9, 2011, is cancelled. This meeting was announced in the                         **Federal Register**                         of December 6, 2010 (75 FR 75680). On February 9, 2011, the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee was scheduled to discuss biologics license application (BLA) 125377, with the proposed trade name YERVOY (ipilimumab), submitted by Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. The proposed indication (use) for this product is for the treatment of advanced melanoma in patients who have received prior therapy. This meeting has been cancelled because the issues for which FDA was seeking the scientific input of the committee have been resolved.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Nicole Vesely, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 31, rm. 2417, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-9001, FAX: 301-847-8533, e-mail:                         *Nicole.vesely@fda.hhs.gov,*                         or FDA Advisory Committee Information Line, 1-800-741-8138 (301-443-0572 in the Washington, DC area), and follow the prompts to the desired center or product area. Please call the Information Line for up-to-date information on this meeting.                    

Dated: December 21, 2010.

Jill Hartzler Warner,

Acting Associate Commissioner for Special Medical Programs.

[FR Doc. 2010-32413 Filed 12-23-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.2


                  CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
           AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with the  quarterly  report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the "Report") of Patient Safety  Technologies,
Inc. (the "Registrant"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof,  I,  William B. Horne,  as the Chief  Financial  Officer of the
Registrant,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as adopted by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Registrant.

Dated:  December 19, 2006                   /s/ WILLIAM B. HORNE
                                            ------------------------------
                                            William B. Horne
                                            Chief Financial Officer

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the  Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 1 (Monday, January 3, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 161]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-33067]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human 
Development; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The concept meeting, proposals and the discussions 
could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such 
as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel. Contraceptive Clinical Trials 
Network.
    Date: January 12, 2011.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate concept review.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 
Room 2A01, Rockville, MD 20852. (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Sathasiva B. Kandasamy, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
Child Health and Human Development, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 
Rockville, Md 20892-9304. (301) 435-6680. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#27544c464943465446674a464e4b09494e4f09404851"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="14677f757a707567755479757d783a7a7d7c3a737b62">[email protected]</span></a>.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 27, 2010.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-33067 Filed 12-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 1130.120 Federal interest in donated property. ( a ) *Requirement.* A DoD Component's general terms and conditions must inform recipients that the Federal Government acquires an interest in any real property or equipment for which the value of the remaining life of the property in the recipient's accounting records or the fair market value of the property is counted toward required cost sharing or matching, rather than charging depreciation.
( b ) *Award terms and conditions.* A DoD Component's general terms and conditions therefore must either: ( 1 ) Include the wording appendix A to this part provides for Section D of PROP Article I to specify the Federal interest in donated real property or equipment; or
( 2 ) Reserve Section D of PROP Article I if the DoD Component does not permit recipients to count the fair market value of real property or equipment toward cost sharing or matching.
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 918 Reported in House (RH)]







                                                 House Calendar No. 213
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 918

                          [Report No. 109-573]

  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 88) 
    proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                         relating to marriage.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 17, 2006

   Mr. Gingrey, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 88) 
    proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                         relating to marriage.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order without intervention of any point of order to consider in the 
House the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 88) proposing an amendment to the 
Constitution of the United States relating to marriage. The joint 
resolution shall be considered as read. The previous question shall be 
considered as ordered on the joint resolution to final passage without 
intervening motion except: (1) one hour and 30 minutes of debate 
equally divided and controlled by the Majority Leader and the Minority 
Leader or their designees; and (2) one motion to recommit.
    Sec. 2. During consideration of H.J. Res. 88 pursuant to this 
resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the 
Chair may postpone further consideration of the joint resolution to a 
time designated by the Speaker.
                                                 House Calendar No. 213

109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 918

                          [Report No. 109-573]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 88) 
    proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                         relating to marriage.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 17, 2006

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Ernest Holley, Appellant, v. Vincent R. Mancusi, as Warden of Attica Prison, Respondent.

— Appeal unanimously dismissed as academic, relator having been released on parole. *(People ex rel. Wilder*v. *Markley,*26 N Y 2d 648.) If we were to pass on the merits, we would affirm the judgment. *(Matter of Briguglio*v. *New 'York State Bd. of Parole,*24 N Y 2d 21.) (Appeal from judgment of Wyoming County Court, dismissing writ of habeas corpus.) Present — Del Vecchio, J. P., Marsh, Gabrielli, Moule and Henry, JJ.
###### Editorial Note on Part 180

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 180 appear at 79 FR 75879, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 180.410 May I approve a participant's use of the services of an excluded person?

After entering into a covered transaction with a participant, you as a Federal agency official may not approve a participant's use of an excluded person as a principal under that transaction, unless you obtain an exception under § 180.135.
#### § 52.77 Contents of applications; general information.

The application must contain all of the information required by 10 CFR 50.33.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 1 (Monday, January 3, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 165]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-33094]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs


Indian Gaming

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Approved Tribal-State Compact Amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice publishes approval of the 2010 Amendments to the 
Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin (``Tribe'') and the State of 
Wisconsin Gaming Compact of 1992, as Amended in 1999, 2000, and 2003.

DATES: Effective Date: January 3, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of 
Indian Gaming, Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary--Policy and 
Economic Development, Washington, DC 20240, (202) 219-4066.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under section 11 of the Indian Gaming 
Regulatory Act of 1988 (IGRA), Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2710, the 
Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the Federal Register notice 
of approved Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class 
III gaming activities on Indian lands. This Amendment changes the 
existing duration of the compact from perpetuity to a 25-year term. It 
also allows the Tribe to reduce the annual revenue sharing payment so 
long as the money withheld is directed towards various Tribal services 
benefitting Tribal members.

    Dated: December 22, 2010.
Donald Laverdure,
Deputy Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2010-33094 Filed 12-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-4N-P
#### § 1.77 Radiation-emitting electronic products.

In addition to the data required to be submitted in § 1.72, an ACE filer must submit all of the declarations required in Form FDA 2877 electronically in ACE at the time of filing entry for products subject to the standards under parts 1020-1050 of this chapter.
Editorial Note on Part 51
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 51 appear at 80 FR 74980, Dec. 1, 2015.

§ 51.103 Record of decision—general. ( a ) The record of decision required by § 51.102 shall be clearly identified and shall: ( 1 ) State the decision.
( 2 ) Identify all alternatives considered by the Commission in reaching the decision, state that these alternatives were included in the range of alternatives discussed in the environmental impact statement, and specify the alternative or alternatives which were considered to be environmentally preferable.
( 3 ) Discuss preferences among alternatives based on relevant factors, including economic and technical considerations where appropriate, the NRC's statutory mission, and any essential considerations of national policy, which were balanced by the Commission in making the decision and state how these considerations entered into the decision.
( 4 ) State whether the Commission has taken all practicable measures within its jurisdiction to avoid or minimize environmental harm from the alternative selected, and if not, to explain why those measures were not adopted. Summarize any license conditions and monitoring programs adopted in connection with mitigation measures.
( 5 ) In making a final decision on a license renewal action pursuant to part 54 of this chapter, the Commission shall determine whether or not the adverse environmental impacts of license renewal are so great that preserving the option of license renewal for energy planning decisionmakers would be unreasonable.
( 6 ) In a construction permit or a combined license proceeding where a limited work authorization under 10 CFR 50.10 was issued, the Commission's decision on the construction permit or combined license application will not address or consider the sunk costs associated with the limited work authorization in determining the proposed action.
( b ) The record of decision may be integrated into any other record prepared by the Commission in connection with the action.
( c ) The record of decision may incorporate by reference material contained in a final environmental impact statement.
[49 FR 9381, Mar. 12, 1984, as amended at 61 FR 28490, June 5, 1996; 61 FR 66546, Dec. 18, 1996; 61 FR 68543, Dec. 30, 1996; 72 FR 57445, Oct. 9, 2007]
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential

.



# United States Court of Appeals

**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

KUMAR INDUSTRIES,

Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant

- Appellee

______________________

2024

- 1293

______________________

Appeal from the United States Court of International

Trade in No. 1:21

- cv

- 00622

- TCS, Senior Judge Timothy C.

Stanceu.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

O R D E R

Upon consideration of Kumar Industries ’ unopposed

motion to voluntarily dismiss this appeal pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b) and the parties ’

agreement as to the allocation of costs,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT :

(1) The motion is granted. The appeal is dismissed. Case: 24-1293 Document: 12 Page: 1 Filed: 03/20/2024KUMAR INDUSTRIES v. US 2

(2) Each party shall bear its own costs.

March 20

, 2024

Date F OR THE C OURT

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: March 20, 2024 Case: 24-1293 Document: 12 Page: 2 Filed: 03/20/2024
§ 1000.15 Examples of electronic products subject to the Radiation Control for Health and Safety Act of 1968. The following listed electronic products are intended to serve as illustrative examples of sources of electronic product radiation to which the regulations of this part apply. ( a ) Examples of electronic products which may emit x-rays and other ionizing electromagnetic radiation, electrons, neutrons, and other particulate radiation include: Ionizing electromagnetic radiation: Television receivers. Accelerators. X-ray machines (industrial, medical, research, educational). Particulate radiation and ionizing electromagnetic radiation: Electron microscopes. Neutron generators.
( b ) Examples of electronic products which may emit ultraviolet, visible, infrared, microwaves, radio and low frequency electromagnetic radiation include: Ultraviolet: Biochemical and medical analyzers. Tanning and therapeutic lamps. Sanitizing and sterilizing devices. Black light sources. Welding equipment. Visible: White light devices. Infrared: Alarm systems. Diathermy units. Dryers, ovens, and heaters. Microwave: Alarm systems. Diathermy units. Dryers, ovens, and heaters. Medico-biological heaters. Microwave power generating devices. Radar devices. Remote control devices. Signal generators. Radio and low frequency: Cauterizers. Diathermy units. Power generation and transmission equipment. Signal generators. Electromedical equipment.
( c ) Examples of electronic products which may emit coherent electromagnetic radiation produced by stimulated emission include: Laser: Art-form, experimental and educational devices. Biomedical analyzers. Cauterizing, burning and welding devices. Cutting and drilling devices. Communications transmitters. Rangefinding devices. Maser: Communications transmitters.
( d ) Examples of electronic products which may emit infrasonic, sonic, and ultrasonic vibrations resulting from operation of an electronic circuit include:
Infrasonic: Vibrators. Sonic: Electronic oscillators. Sound amplification equipment. Ultrasonic: Cauterizers. Cell and tissue disintegrators. Cleaners. Diagnostic and nondestructive testing equipment. Ranging and detection equipment.