alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 1 (Monday, January 3, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 88]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-33125]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1728]


Voluntary Termination of Foreign-Trade Subzone 102A, Ford Motor 
Corporation, Hazelwood, MO

    Pursuant to the authority granted in the Foreign-Trade Zones Act 
of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), and the Foreign-
Trade Zones Board Regulations (15 CFR part 400), the Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board has adopted the following order:

    Whereas, on April 27, 1984, the Foreign-Trade Zones Board issued a 
grant of authority to the St. Louis County Port Authority (grantee of 
FTZ 102) authorizing the establishment of Foreign-Trade Subzone 102A at 
the Ford Motor Corporation plant in Hazelwood, Missouri (Board Order 
252, 49 FR 19541, 5/8/84);
    Whereas, the St. Louis County Port Authority has advised that zone 
procedures are no longer needed at the facility and requested voluntary 
termination of Subzone 102A (FTZ Docket 66-2010);
    Whereas, the request has been reviewed by the FTZ Staff and Customs 
and Border Protection officials, and approval has been recommended;
    Now, therefore, the Foreign-Trade Zones Board terminates the 
subzone status of Subzone 102A, effective this date.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 20th day of December 2010.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, Alternate 
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-33125 Filed 12-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1038 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1038

To amend the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 to enhance 
the ability to produce fruits and vegetables on covered commodity base 
                                 acres.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 16, 2005

   Mr. Lugar introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 to enhance 
the ability to produce fruits and vegetables on covered commodity base 
                                 acres.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Farming Flexibility Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. PRODUCTION OF FRUITS AND VEGETABLES FOR PROCESSING ON COVERED 
              COMMODITY BASE ACRES.

    Section 1101 of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 
(7 U.S.C. 7911) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(i) Production of Fruits or Vegetables for Processing.--
            ``(1) In general.--Subject to paragraphs (2) and (3), the 
        producers on a farm, with the consent of the owner of and any 
        other producers on the farm, may reduce the base acres for a 
        covered commodity for the farm if the reduced acres are used 
        for the planting and production of fruits or vegetables for 
        processing.
            ``(2) Reversion to base acres for covered commodity.--Any 
        reduced acres of a farm devoted to the planting and production 
        of fruits or vegetables during a crop year under paragraph (1) 
        shall be included in base acres for the covered commodity for 
        the subsequent crop year, unless the producers on the farm make 
        the election described in paragraph (1) for the subsequent crop 
        year.
            ``(3) Recalculation of base acres.--
                    ``(A) In general.--Subject to subparagraph (B), if 
                the Secretary recalculates base acres for a farm, the 
                planting and production of fruits or vegetables for 
                processing under paragraph (1) shall be considered to 
                be the same as the planting, prevented planting, or 
                production of the covered commodity.
                    ``(B) Authority.--Nothing in this subsection 
                provides authority for the Secretary to recalculate 
                base acres for a farm.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 11
                                                                      ----------

                          COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE LOSS

                           National Datacomputer, Inc.
              Statement recomputation of net loss per common share


<TABLE><CAPTION>
                                                                       NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                 ------------------------------
                                                                 SEPTEMBER 30,     SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                                     2002              2001
                                                                 ------------      ------------
<S>                                                              <C>               <C>
Net loss, as reported                                            $   (644,500)     $ (1,021,288)

Preferred stock preference items:

Interest on Series B, C, D and F convertible preferred stock     $   (200,250)     $   (202,875)
                                                                 ------------      ------------

Total preferred stock preference item                            $   (200,250)     $   (202,875)

Net loss attributable to common stockholders                     $   (844,750)     $ (1,224,163)

Weighted average shares outstanding:

Shares attributable to common stock outstanding                    12,052,879         9,235,445
                                                                 ------------      ------------

Weighted average shares outstanding                                12,052,879         9,235,445
                                                                 ============      ============

Net loss per share                                               $      (0.07)     $      (0.13)
                                                                 ============      ============

</TABLE>
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 40560 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

–

Appellee ,

v. IRA TERRELL ROBERTS, JR. , also known as Junior,

Defendant

– Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:17

- CR

- 109

- 1

Before JONES, HIGGINSON, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Ira Terrell Roberts, Jr. , has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Roberts h a s not filed a res ponse. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set f orth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 13, 2020 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-40560 Document: 00515344312 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/13/2020No. 19

- 40560

2 appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 19-40560 Document: 00515344312 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/13/2020
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 954 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.954

                     One Hundred Fifteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
          the third day of January, two thousand and seventeen

                                 An Act

 
To remove the use restrictions on certain land transferred to Rockingham 
                County, Virginia, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF USE RESTRICTION.
    Public Law 101-479 (104 Stat. 1158) is amended--
        (1) by striking section 2(d); and
        (2) by adding the following new section at the end:
``SEC. 4. REMOVAL OF USE RESTRICTION.
    ``(a) The approximately 1-acre portion of the land referred to in 
section 3 that is used for purposes of a child care center, as 
authorized by this Act, shall not be subject to the use restriction 
imposed in the deed referred to in section 3.
    ``(b) Upon enactment of this section, the Secretary of the Interior 
shall execute an instrument to carry out subsection (a).''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
§ 1.1113 What are the eligibility requirements for a recognized accreditation body? A recognized accreditation body or an accreditation body seeking recognition must meet all of the following requirements: ( a ) Demonstrates compliance with ISO/IEC 17011:2017(E) (incorporated by reference, see § 1.1101).
( b ) Demonstrates that it is a full member of the International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperative (ILAC).
( c ) Demonstrates that it is a signatory to the ILAC Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA) that has demonstrated competence to ISO/IEC 17011:2017(E) with a scope of “Testing: ISO/IEC 17025.”
( d ) Will comply with all additional requirements for recognized accreditation bodies under this subpart while recognized.
# L_2008141EN.01002202.xml

| 31.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 141/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 141/22

---

Corrigendum to Council Directive 91/496/EEC of 15 July 1991 laying down the principles governing the organization of veterinary checks on animals entering the Community from third countries and amending Directives 89/662/EEC, 90/425/EEC and 90/675/EEC

(
  Official Journal of the European Communities L 268 of 24 September 1991
  )

On page 60, in Article 7(3), second subparagraph:

for:

‘In particular, the information from the competent authority of the place of destination given by means of the information exchange system provided for in Article 20 of Directive 90/425/EEC, must specify whether:’,

read:

‘In particular, the information to the competent authority of the place of destination given by means of the information exchange system provided for in Article 20 of Directive 90/425/EEC, must specify whether:’.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Balance
Sheet, Statement of Operations, Statements of Cash Flows and Notes thereto
incorporated in Part I, Item 1. of this Form 10-QSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          27,040
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,040
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  27,040
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        47,400
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,040
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    27,040
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,105
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,105)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,105)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
**Missouri**

**Missouri 12 Pemiscot**
#### § 3485.937 ED Deciding Official.

The ED Deciding Official is an officer of the Department who has delegated authority under the procedures of the Department of Education to decide whether to affirm a suspension or enter a debarment.

(Authority: E.O. 12549 (3 CFR 1986 Comp., p. 189); E.O. 12689 (3 CFR 1989 Comp., p. 235); sec. 2455, Pub. L. 103-355, 108 Stat. 3327 (31 U.S.C. 6101 note); 20 U.S.C. 1082, 1094, 1221e-3, and 3474)
§ 1301.51 Modification in registration. ( a ) Any registrant may apply to modify his/her registration to authorize the handling of additional controlled substances or to change his/her name or address by submitting a written request to the Registration Unit, Drug Enforcement Administration. See the Table of DEA Mailing Addresses in § 1321.01 of this chapter for the current mailing address. Additionally, such a request may be submitted on-line at *www.DEAdiversion.usdoj.gov .* ( 1 ) The request shall contain: ( i ) The registrant's name, address, and registration number as printed on the certificate of registration;
( ii ) The substances and/or schedules to be added to the registration or the new name or address; and
( iii ) A signature in accordance with § 1301.13(j).
( 2 ) If the registrant is seeking to handle additional controlled substances listed in Schedule I for the purpose of research or instructional activities, the registrant shall attach three copies of a research protocol describing each research project involving the additional substances, or two copies of a statement describing the nature, extent, and duration of such instructional activities, as appropriate.
( b ) Any manufacturer, distributor, reverse distributor, narcotic treatment program, hospital/clinic with an on-site pharmacy, or retail pharmacy registered pursuant to this part, may apply to modify its registration to become authorized as a collector by submitting a written request to the Registration Unit, Drug Enforcement Administration. See the Table of DEA Mailing Addresses in § 1321.01 of this chapter for the current mailing address. Additionally, such request may be submitted on-line at *www.DEAdiversion.usdoj.gov .* ( 1 ) The request shall contain: ( i ) The registrant's name, address, and registration number as printed on the certificate of registration;
( ii ) The method(s) of collection the registrant intends to conduct (collection receptacle and/or mail-back program); and
( iii ) A signature in accordance with § 1301.13(j).
( 2 ) If a hospital/clinic with an on-site pharmacy or retail pharmacy is applying for a modification in registration to authorize such registrant to be a collector to maintain a collection receptacle at a long-term care facility in accordance with § 1317.80 of this chapter, the request shall also include the name and physical location of each long-term care facility at which the hospital/clinic with an on-site pharmacy, or the retail pharmacy, intends to operate a collection receptacle.
( c ) No fee shall be required for modification. The request for modification shall be handled in the same manner as an application for registration. If the modification of registration is approved, the Administrator shall issue a new certificate of registration (DEA Form 223) to the registrant, who shall maintain it with the old certificate of registration until expiration.
[79 FR 53561, Sept. 9, 2014]
§ 415.10 State comments on proposed Federal financial assistance and direct Federal development. ( a ) Except in unusual circumstances, the Secretary gives State processes or directly affected State, areawide, regional, and local officials and entities: ( 1 ) At least 30 days from the date established by the Secretary to comment on proposed Federal financial assistance in the form of noncompeting continuation awards; and
( 2 ) At least 60 days from the date established by the Secretary to comment on proposed direct Federal development or Federal financial assistance other than noncompeting continuation awards.
( b ) This section also applies to comments in cases in which the review, coordination and communication with the Department have been delegated.
( c ) Applicants for programs and activities subject to section 204 of the Demonstration Cities and Metropolitan Development Act shall allow areawide agencies a 60-day opportunity for review and comment.
THE UNITED BUILDING

77 WEST WACKER DRIVE

CHICAGO, IL60601

November 5, 2012

Mr. Paul L. Gretch

Director

Office of International Aviation

Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Notice of Air China and United

Docket DOT-OST-2003-16213

Dear Mr. Gretch:

Pursuant to the blanket Statement of Authorization granted to United and Air China by Notice of 

Action Taken dated October 24, 2003, United and Air China notify the Department of the 

expansion of their code share on or after December 5, 2012 as follows:

 Air China will display the “UA” designator code on flights it operates within China that 

connect to United’s current and any future China gateways.

 United will display the “CA” designator code on flights it operates within the United States 

that connect to Air China’s current and any future U.S. gateways.

The proposed code-share services are fully consistent with the U.S.-China Air Services 

Agreement, as amended. See, Article 11 (5)(1)(a). In addition, United and Air China each hold 

broad exemption authority that authorizes them to provide service between any U.S. point and 

any point in China.1 Consistent with the Department’s efforts to streamline regulatory 

procedures, United and Air China will now only advise the Department of future code shares not 

covered by this notice and obtain any necessary underlying authority for such expanded code 

shares.

Respectfully submitted,

 

George N. Tompkins, Jr. Dan Weiss

Counsel for AIR CHINA Managing Director, International Affairs and

LIMITED d/b/a AIR CHINA Regulatory 

 UNITED AIR LINES, INC. 

cc: Esta Rosenberg

Robert Finamore

 

1

See Notice of Action Taken dated October 16, 2012 in this docket renewing United’s exemption authority to code 

share with Air China. Pursuant to the automatic extension provisions of 5 U.S.C. §558(c), Air China’s exemption 

authority with United remains in effect pending final DOT action on its November 30, 2009 renewal application. 
 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I have this date served a copy of the foregoing document on all 

persons named below by causing a copy to be sent via email.

msinick@ssd.com

francis.heil@aa.com

robert.wirick@aa.com

rpommer@atlasair.com

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

sametta.c.barnett@delta.com

robert.cohn@hoganlovells.com

patrick.rizzi@hoganlovells.com

jhill@dowlohnes.com

bob.kneisley@wnco.com

dkirstein@yklaw.com

jyoung@yklaw.com

john.fredericksen@suncountry.com

pmurphy@lopmurphy.com

anita.mosner@hklaw.com

howard.kass@usairways.com

benjamin.slocum@usairways.com

john.varley@virginamerica.com

william.stallings@usdoj.gov

dwight.moore@ustranscom.mil

john.allen@faa.gov

Annalei Avanceña 

International Regulatory Advisor

November 5, 2012
89–006

House Calendar No. 271

106TH CONGRESS REPT. 106–801 " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session Part 2

CONTEMPT OF CONGRESS

OCTOBER 26, 2000.—Ordered to be printed

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska, from the Committee on Resources,

submitted the following

SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT

together with

DISSENTING VIEWS

[Report on the Refusals to Comply with Subpoenas Issued by the Committee on

Resources]

The reason for this supplemental report is to comply with clause

3(a)(1)(B) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives,

requiring a report of a committee on a measure or matter shall be

printed in a single volume that ‘‘shall bear on its cover a recital

that such supplemental, minority or additional views * * * are included as part of the report.’’

Æ
Editorial Note on Part 112
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 112 appear at 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 112.6 What modified requirements apply to me if my farm is eligible for a qualified exemption in accordance with § 112.5? ( a ) If your farm is eligible for a qualified exemption in accordance with § 112.5, you are subject to the requirements of: ( 1 ) This subpart (General Provisions);
( 2 ) Subpart O of this part (Records);
( 3 ) Subpart Q of this part (Compliance and Enforcement); and
( 4 ) Subpart R of this part (Withdrawal of Qualified Exemption).
( b ) In addition, you are subject to the following modified requirements: ( 1 ) When a food packaging label is required on food that would otherwise be covered produce under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act or its implementing regulations, you must include prominently and conspicuously on the food packaging label the name and the complete business address of the farm where the produce was grown.
( 2 ) When a food packaging label is not required on food that would otherwise be covered produce under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, you must prominently and conspicuously display, at the point of purchase, the name and complete business address of the farm where the produce was grown, on a label, poster, sign, placard, or documents delivered contemporaneously with the produce in the normal course of business, or, in the case of Internet sales, in an electronic notice.
( 3 ) The complete business address that you must include in accordance with the requirements of paragraph (b)(1) or (2) of this section must include the street address or post office box, city, state, and zip code for domestic farms, and comparable full address information for foreign farms.