alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Household Finance                                           
Corporation
HRSI Funding, Inc.                                          
Household Private Label                                     
Credit Card Master Trust II,
Series 1994-2
                                                            
Original Principal Class A       307,500,000.00                  
Number of Class A Bonds                 307,500                  
($1,000)
Original Principal Class B        22,500,000.00                  
Number of Class B Bonds                  22,500                  
($1,000)
                                                            
                                           Sum 1/20/98 -
                                              12/21/98
Distribution Date                 12/21/98    Total 1998
Days                                    31                  
                                                            
CLASS A                                                     
Beginning Class A Principal  136,666,666.68                  
Balance
Beg Class A Percentage              44.44%                  
Principal Distribution       17,083,333.33    187,916,666.65
Principal Payment Factor      55.555555545            611.11
(per $1,000)
                                                            
Ending Class A Principal     119,583,333.35                  
Balance
Ending Class A Percentage           38.89%                  
                                                            
Class A Interest                888,333.33     17,877,708.33
Distribution
Interest Payment Factor (per   2.888888878             58.14
$1,000)
                                                            
Total Class A Distribution   17,971,666.66    205,794,374.98
Amount
Total Distribution Pymt       58.444444423            669.25
Factor (per $1,000)
                                                            
                                                            
Class B                                                     
Beginning Class B Principal  22,500,000.00                  
Balance
Beg Class B Percentage             100.00%                  
Principal Distribution                0.00              0.00
Principal Payment Factor       0.000000000              0.00
(per $1,000)
                                                            
Ending Class B Principal     22,500,000.00                  
Balance
Ending Class B Percentage          100.00%                  
                                                            
Class B Interest                150,000.00      1,800,000.00
Distribution
Interest Payment Factor (per   6.666666667             80.00
$1,000)
                                                            
Total Class B Distribution      150,000.00      1,800,000.00
Amount
Total Distribution Pymt        6.666666667             80.00
Factor (per $1,000)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         172,448
<SECURITIES>                                       400
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,286
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               200,134
<PP&E>                                       3,011,349
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,042,709
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,168,774
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,170
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,000,651
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,168,774
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                79,768
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   37,499
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 42,269
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             42,269
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    42,269
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.25


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.05

                     AMENDMENT #1 TO SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE
                     ---------------------------------------

New York, New York                                    Effective January 25, 2005

     The  undersigned,  AES Management  Buyout  Company,  Inc. (the  "Borrower")
pursuant to a Secured  Promissory  Note dated  September  28, 2004 (the  "Note")
promised  to pay to the order of Embryo  Development  Corp.  (the  "Payee")  the
principal amount of $300,000 together with interest thereon at the rate of eight
(8%) percent per annum from the date thereof.

     The Note was made in  conjunction  with a certain  Letter  of Intent  dated
August 4, 2004 (the  "LOI") and is secured by a Security  Agreement  in favor of
the Payee, as described therein.

     Except as otherwise  specifically  agreed to in this amendment,  all terms,
conditions and provisions of the Note and Security Agreement are hereby affirmed
and shall  remain in full force and  effect.  Further,  all terms not  otherwise
defined in this Amendment shall be deemed to be defined as in the Note.

     The Payee, by execution hereof, acknowledges that a Definitive Agreement as
contemplated by the LOI is still being  negotiated in good faith.  Based on such
good faith  negotiation,  the parties have agreed that: In  connection  with the
acceleration  of the Maturity  Date,  as provided by the Note where a Definitive
Agreement  has not been  executed by January 31, 2005,  the last sentence of the
second paragraph of the Note is hereby amended to read as follows:

     "In the event the Definitive  Agreement as  contemplated by the LOI, is not
     executed by March 15, 2005,  the  Maturity  Date shall be  accelerated  and
     accrued  interest  due on this Note  shall be due and  payable on April 15,
     2005."

     By signing below Borrower and Payee hereby agree to the foregoing amendment
to the Note, effective immediately.

     IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the parties  have set their hands as of the day first
set forth above.

AES Management Buyout Company            Embryo Development Corp.



By: /s/                                  By:  /s/
    -------------------------                 -------------------
    President                                 CEO
#### § 1000.1 General.

References in this subchapter J to regulatory sections of the Code of Federal Regulations are to chapter I of title 21 unless otherwise noted.

[50 FR 33688, Aug. 20, 1985]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 916 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 916

 Impeaching Manuel L. Real, judge of the United States District Court 
      for the Central District of California, for high crimes and 
                             misdemeanors.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 17, 2006

    Mr. Sensenbrenner submitted the following resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Impeaching Manuel L. Real, judge of the United States District Court 
      for the Central District of California, for high crimes and 
                             misdemeanors.

    Resolved,  That Manuel L. Real, judge of the United States District 
Court for the Central District of California, is impeached for high 
crimes and misdemeanors.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 1.1430 What information submitted in a petition requesting a waiver for a type of entity, or information in comments on such a petition, is publicly available?

FDA will presume that information submitted in a petition requesting a waiver for a type of entity, as well as information in comments submitted on such a petition, does not contain information exempt from public disclosure under part 20 of this chapter and will be made public as part of the docket associated with the petition.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Martin Judd, Appellant.

[814 NYS2d 165]

Order,Supreme Court, New York County (Ruth Levine Sussman, J.), entered on or about April 12, 2005, which adjudicated defendant a level three sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The record supports the court’s independent finding, following a recommendation by the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders, that defendant should be designated a level three sex offender, based on his prior felony sex crime conviction, which is a presumptive overriding factor under the Board’s guidelines *(see People v Scott,*288 AD2d 763 [2001]). Defendant’s 1985 and 1992 felony convictions both involved sex crimes against children. The danger of future recidivism evinced by this past recidivism outweighs the various mitigating factors argued by defendant, such as the absence of recent criminal activity, and the court properly concluded that defendant’s present circumstances did not warrant a downward departure from his presumptive risk level *(see People v Guarnan,*8 AD3d 545 [2004]). Concur— Tom, J.E, Saxe, Nardelli, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 760 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 760

Supporting the designation of March 2018 as National Colorectal Cancer 
                            Awareness Month.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 1, 2018

   Mr. Payne (for himself, Ms. Clarke of New York, Mr. Panetta, Mr. 
 Johnson of Georgia, Mr. Gonzalez of Texas, Mr. Blumenauer, Mr. Soto, 
Ms. Norton, and Mrs. Beatty) submitted the following resolution; which 
    was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Supporting the designation of March 2018 as National Colorectal Cancer 
                            Awareness Month.

Whereas colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death among men 
        and women combined in the United States;
Whereas this year, more than 130,000 individuals in the United States will be 
        diagnosed with colorectal cancer and approximately 50,000 more will die 
        from it;
Whereas colorectal cancer is one of the most highly preventable forms of cancer 
        because screening tests can find polyps that can be removed before 
        becoming cancerous;
Whereas screening tests can detect colorectal cancer early, when treatment works 
        best;
Whereas the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that if every 
        individual aged 50 or older had regular screening tests, as many as 60 
        percent of deaths from colorectal cancer could be prevented;
Whereas the 5-year survival rate for patients with localized colorectal cancer 
        is 90 percent, but only 39 percent of all diagnoses occur at this stage;
Whereas colorectal cancer screenings can effectively reduce colorectal cancer 
        incidence and mortality, yet, 1 in 3 adults between the ages of 50 and 
        75 are not up to date with recommended colorectal cancer screening;
Whereas public awareness and education campaigns on colorectal cancer 
        prevention, screening, and symptoms are held during the month of March 
        each year; and
Whereas educational efforts can help provide information to the public of 
        methods of prevention and screening, as well as about symptoms for early 
        detection: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of National Colorectal 
        Cancer Awareness Month; and
            (2) encourages the people of the United States to observe 
        the month with appropriate awareness and educational 
        activities.
                                 <all>
```
§ 200.510 Financial statements. ( a ) *Financial statements.* The auditee must prepare financial statements that reflect its financial position, results of operations or changes in net assets, and, where appropriate, cash flows for the fiscal year audited. The financial statements must be for the same organizational unit and fiscal year that is chosen to meet the requirements of this part. However, non-Federal entity-wide financial statements may also include departments, agencies, and other organizational units that have separate audits in accordance with § 200.514(a) and prepare separate financial statements.
( b ) *Schedule of expenditures of Federal awards.* The auditee must also prepare a schedule of expenditures of Federal awards for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements which must include the total Federal awards expended as determined in accordance with § 200.502. While not required, the auditee may choose to provide information requested by Federal awarding agencies and pass-through entities to make the schedule easier to use. For example, when a Federal program has multiple Federal award years, the auditee may list the amount of Federal awards expended for each Federal award year separately. At a minimum, the schedule must: ( 1 ) List individual Federal programs by Federal agency. For a cluster of programs, provide the cluster name, list individual Federal programs within the cluster of programs, and provide the applicable Federal agency name. For R&D, total Federal awards expended must be shown either by individual Federal award or by Federal agency and major subdivision within the Federal agency. For example, the National Institutes of Health is a major subdivision in the Department of Health and Human Services.
( 2 ) For Federal awards received as a subrecipient, the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity must be included.
( 3 ) Provide total Federal awards expended for each individual Federal program and the Assistance Listings Number or other identifying number when the Assistance Listings information is not available. For a cluster of programs also provide the total for the cluster.
( 4 ) Include the total amount provided to subrecipients from each Federal program.
( 5 ) For loan or loan guarantee programs described in § 200.502(b), identify in the notes to the schedule the balances outstanding at the end of the audit period. This is in addition to including the total Federal awards expended for loan or loan guarantee programs in the schedule.
( 6 ) Include notes that describe that significant accounting policies used in preparing the schedule, and note whether or not the auditee elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate as covered in § 200.414.
[78 FR 78608, Dec. 26, 2013, as amended at 79 FR 75887, Dec. 19, 2014; 85 FR 49572, Aug. 13, 2020]
#### Heydon, Appellee, *v.*Ohio Department of Commerce, Division of Financial Institutions, Appellant.

[Cite as *Heydon v. Ohio Dept. of Commerce,*116 Ohio St.3d 103, 2007-Ohio-5553.]

*104(No. 2007-1011

Submitted September 18, 2007

Decided October 24, 2007.)

Stark & Knoll Co., L.P.A., Harry A. Tipping, Christopher A. Tipping, and Donald R. Scherer, for appellee.

Marc Dann, Attorney General, Elise Porter, Acting Solicitor General, Stephen P. Carney and Robert J. Krummen, Deputy Solicitors, and Theodore L. Klecker, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of *Hughes v. Ohio Dept. of Commerce,*114 Ohio St.3d 47, 2007-Ohio-2877, 868 N.E.2d 246, and the cause is remanded to the trial court with instructions to dismiss the appeal.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

O’Donnell, J., concurs separately.

Pfeifer, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his separate opinion in *Hughes v. Ohio Dept. of Commerce,*114 Ohio St.3d 47, 2007-Ohio-2877, 868 N.E.2d 246.

O’Donnell, J.,

concurring.

{¶ 3} I concur in the court’s decision and write to clarify that the law, post-*Hughes,*still requires that a party desiring to appeal from an adverse decision of an administrative agency must file the original notice of appeal with the agency and a copy of that notice with the clerk of the court in order to vest the court with jurisdiction to hear the appeal. Here, that procedure was not followed, and the court never obtained jurisdiction over the case. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in my dissent in *Hughes,*I concur in the decision to remand with instructions to dismiss this appeal and add that this ought to have been the result in *Hughes*as well.
AUG-05-2013 10:11 DOMBROFF GILMORE 7033368751



## .. Albany Atlanta Brussels Denver Los Angeles Miami New York 

# McKenna Long 

# &Aldridgew
1676 International Drive • Penthouse Mclean, VA 22102**T~l:** 703.336.8800**mck~nnalong.com** -. i""i :.<- ·._' i.! P.02

Northern Virginia

Orange County Rancho Santa Fe San Diego San Frnnelseo Washington, DC

MARKA. DOMBROFF 703.336.8700 EMAILADDRESS mdombroff@mckennalong.com
August2, 2013
VIA

### FA.CSIMILE AND FIRST CLASS MAIL The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder ChiefAdministrative LawJudge 

### U.S Department ofTransportation Office ofHearings, M-20 RoqmEl2-320 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590
Re: Colgan Air, Inc. 

### FAA Docket

### No. CP09EA0002, -0005,-0016 

### Dear Judge Yoder: We apologize for not advising you regarding our client's position regarding the draft order submitted

### by Mr. Lewerenz on July 29,2013, in this matter. The attorney at our client responsible for this matter has been onvacation this week and has assured us he will address it upon his return on Monday, August 5, 2013. We appreciate, and share, your desire to achieve finality.

cc: Christian Lewerenz Via Email

TOTAL P.02
§ 182.205 What must I include in my drug-free workplace statement? You must publish a statement that— ( a ) Tells your employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in your workplace;
( b ) Specifies the actions that you will take against employees for violating that prohibition; and
( c ) Lets each employee know that, as a condition of employment under any award, he or she: ( 1 ) Will abide by the terms of the statement; and
( 2 ) Must notify you in writing if he or she is convicted for a violation of a criminal drug statute occurring in the workplace and must do so no more than five calendar days after the conviction.
# EUR-Lex - 31993D0607 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31993D0607

**93/607/EC: Commission Decision of 15 November 1993 amending Decision 86/414/EEC as regards the list of establishments in Argentina approved for the purpose of importing meat products into the Community **

*
Official Journal L 291 , 25/11/1993 P. 0017 - 0018 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 53 P. 0189 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 53 P. 0189 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 15 November 1993 amending Decision 86/414/EEC as regards the list of establishments in Argentina approved for the purpose of importing meat products into the Community (93/607/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 72/462/EEC of 12 December 1972 on health and veterinary inspection problems upon importation of bovine animals and swine and fresh meat or meat products from third countries (1), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1601/92 (2), and in particular Article 4 (1) thereof,

Whereas a list of establishments in Argentina, approved for the purpose of importing meat products into the Community, was drawn up initially by Commission Decision 86/414/EEC (3), as last amended by Decision 93/345/EEC (4);

Whereas a Community on-the-spot visit to meat product establishments in Argentina has revealed that the level of hygiene in one establishment has improved since the last inspection; whereas the list of establishments should be amended accordingly;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Annex to Decision 86/414/EEC is hereby replaced by the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 November 1993.

For the Commission

René STEICHEN

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 302, 31. 12. 1972, p. 28.

(2) OJ No L 173, 27. 6. 1992, p. 13.

(3) OJ No L 237, 23. 8. 1986, p. 36.

(4) OJ No L 139, 10. 6. 1993, p. 21.

ANNEX

LIST OF ESTABLISHMENTS

>TABLE>
§ 184.6 Construction material standards. ( a ) The Buy America Preference applies to the following construction materials incorporated into infrastructure projects. Each construction material is followed by a standard for the material to be considered “produced in the United States.” ( 1 ) *Non-ferrous metals.* All manufacturing processes, from initial smelting or melting through final shaping, coating, and assembly, occurred in the United States.
( 2 ) *Plastic and polymer-based products.* All manufacturing processes, from initial combination of constituent plastic or polymer-based inputs, or, where applicable, constituent composite materials, until the item is in its final form, occurred in the United States.
( 3 ) *Glass.* All manufacturing processes, from initial batching and melting of raw materials through annealing, cooling, and cutting, occurred in the United States.
( 4 ) *Fiber optic cable (including drop cable).* All manufacturing processes, from the initial ribboning (if applicable), through buffering, fiber stranding and jacketing, occurred in the United States. All manufacturing processes also include the standards for glass and optical fiber, but not for non-ferrous metals, plastic and polymer-based products, or any others.
( 5 ) *Optical fiber.* All manufacturing processes, from the initial preform fabrication stage through the completion of the draw, occurred in the United States.
( 6 ) *Lumber.* All manufacturing processes, from initial debarking through treatment and planing, occurred in the United States.
( 7 ) *Drywall.* All manufacturing processes, from initial blending of mined or synthetic gypsum plaster and additives through cutting and drying of sandwiched panels, occurred in the United States.
( 8 ) *Engineered wood.* All manufacturing processes from the initial combination of constituent materials until the wood product is in its final form, occurred in the United States.
( b ) Except as specifically provided, only a single standard under paragraph (a) of this section should be applied to a single construction material.