alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 1210.26 Permits for raw milk or cream.

Except as provided in § 1210.27, permits to ship or transport raw milk or cream into the United States will be granted only when the milk or cream comes from dairy farms or plants where pasteurization is not carried on and then only upon compliance with the requirements of clauses 1, 2, and 3 of section 2 of the Federal Import Milk Act, §§ 1210.11 to 1210.14 as applicable.
SUBSIDIARIES OF SYSTEMAX INC.

Exhibit 21

Domestic Subsidiaries

| | 1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14. | Global Computer Supplies Inc. (a New York corporation)
Global Equipment Company Inc. (a New York corporation)
Tiger Direct Inc. (a Florida corporation)
Nexel Industries Inc. (a New York corporation)
Systemax Manufacturing Inc. (a Delaware corporation)
Profit Center Software Inc. (a New York corporation)
Global Gov't/Education Solutions, Inc. (a Delaware corporation)
Papier Catalogues Inc. (a New York corporation)
Misco America Inc. (a Delaware corporation)
Millennium Falcon Corp. (a Delaware corporation)
Systemax Services Inc. (a New York corporation)
SYX Distribution (a Delaware corporation)
OnRebate.com (a Delaware corporation)
Ultra Products Inc. (a Delaware corporation)
| | ---------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FOREIGN SUBSIDIARIES

| | 1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7. | Misco Germany Inc. (a New York corporation)
Misco Italy Computer Supplies S.P.A. (an Italian corporation)
H C S Global SA (a French corporation)
Systemax Europe Ltd. (a U.K. corporation)
Global Computer Products BV (a Dutch corporation)
Dabus Dataproducktor AB (a Swedish corporation)
Misco Iberia Computer Supplies S.A. (a Spanish corporation
| | -------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-6304

BRIAN A. REAVIS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

FNU STEVNE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:20-hc-02178-BO)

Submitted: June 29, 2021 Decided: July 2, 2021

Before HARRIS, RICHARDSON, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Brian A. Reavis, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Brian A. Reavis seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 

28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. See Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 148 & n.9 (2012) 

(explaining that § 2254 petitions are subject to one-year statute of limitations, running from 

latest of four commencement dates enumerated in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)). The order is 

not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial 

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When, as here,

the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both 

that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez, 565 U.S. at 140-41 (citing Slack v. 

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Reavis has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the 

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
§ 200.404 Reasonable costs. A cost is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person under the circumstances prevailing at the time the decision was made to incur the cost. The question of reasonableness is particularly important when the non-Federal entity is predominantly federally-funded. In determining reasonableness of a given cost, consideration must be given to: ( a ) Whether the cost is of a type generally recognized as ordinary and necessary for the operation of the non-Federal entity or the proper and efficient performance of the Federal award.
( b ) The restraints or requirements imposed by such factors as: sound business practices; arm's-length bargaining; Federal, state, local, tribal, and other laws and regulations; and terms and conditions of the Federal award.
( c ) Market prices for comparable goods or services for the geographic area.
( d ) Whether the individuals concerned acted with prudence in the circumstances considering their responsibilities to the non-Federal entity, its employees, where applicable its students or membership, the public at large, and the Federal Government.
( e ) Whether the non-Federal entity significantly deviates from its established practices and policies regarding the incurrence of costs, which may unjustifiably increase the Federal award's cost.
[78 FR 78608, Dec. 26, 2013, as amended at 79 FR 75885, Dec. 19, 2014]
§ 421.20 Does this part apply to me? This part and, through this part, pertinent portions of the OMB guidance in Subparts A through F of 2 CFR part 182 (see table at 2 CFR 182.115(b)) apply to you if you are a— ( a ) Recipient of a USDA grant or cooperative agreement; or
( b ) USDA awarding official.
§ 111.160 What requirements apply to packaging and labels received? ( a ) You must visually examine each immediate container or grouping of immediate containers in a shipment for appropriate content label, container damage, or broken seals to determine whether the container condition may have resulted in contamination or deterioration of the packaging and labels.
( b ) You must visually examine the supplier's invoice, guarantee, or certification in a shipment to ensure that the packaging or labels are consistent with your purchase order.
( c ) You must quarantine packaging and labels before you use them in the manufacture of a dietary supplement until: ( 1 ) You collect representative samples of each unique shipment, and of each unique lot within each unique shipment, of packaging and labels and, at a minimum, conduct a visual identification of the immediate containers and closures;
( 2 ) Quality control personnel review and approve the results of any tests or examinations conducted on the packaging and labels; and
( 3 ) Quality control personnel approve the packaging and labels for use in the manufacture of a dietary supplement and release them from quarantine.
( d ) ( 1 ) You must identify each unique lot within each unique shipment of packaging and labels in a manner that allows you to trace the lot to the supplier, the date received, the name of the packaging and label, the status of the packaging and label (e.g., quarantined, approved, or rejected); and to the dietary supplement that you distributed; and
( 2 ) You must use this unique identifier whenever you record the disposition of each unique lot within each unique shipment of packaging and labels.
( e ) You must hold packaging and labels under conditions that will protect against contamination and deterioration, and avoid mixups.
#### § 1302.06 Sealing of controlled substances.

On each bottle, multiple dose vial, or other commercial container of any controlled substance, there shall be securely affixed to the stopper, cap, lid, covering, or wrapper or such container a seal to disclose upon inspection any tampering or opening of the container.

[62 FR 13958, Mar. 24, 1997]
§ 111.30 What requirements apply to automated, mechanical, or electronic equipment? For any automated, mechanical, or electronic equipment that you use to manufacture, package, label, or hold a dietary supplement, you must: ( a ) Design or select equipment to ensure that dietary supplement specifications are consistently met;
( b ) Determine the suitability of the equipment by ensuring that your equipment is capable of operating satisfactorily within the operating limits required by the process;
( c ) Routinely calibrate, inspect, or check the equipment to ensure proper performance. Your quality control personnel must periodically review these calibrations, inspections, or checks;
( d ) Establish and use appropriate controls for automated, mechanical, and electronic equipment (including software for a computer controlled process) to ensure that any changes to the manufacturing, packaging, labeling, holding, or other operations are approved by quality control personnel and instituted only by authorized personnel; and
( e ) Establish and use appropriate controls to ensure that the equipment functions in accordance with its intended use. These controls must be approved by quality control personnel.
#### GEBER, Respondent, v. JOHN WANAMAKER, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

December 4, 1914.)

Action by Jospeh B. Geber against John Wanamaker. S. P. Anderton, of New York City, for appellant. C. Steckler, of New York City, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Order filed. See, also, 149 N. Y. Supp. 1083.
#### § 801.332 What methods must I use to pass requirements down to participants at lower tiers with whom I intend to do business?

You as a participant must include a term or condition in lower-tier transactions requiring lower-tier participants to comply with subpart C of the OMB guidance in 2 CFR part 180, as supplemented by this subpart.
Editorial Note on Part 12
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 12 appear at 88 FR 45064, July 14, 2023.

§ 12.82 Petition to participate in forma pauperis. ( a ) A participant who believes that compliance with the filing and service requirements of this section constitutes an unreasonable financial burden may submit to the Commissioner a petition to participate in forma pauperis.
( b ) The petition will be in the form specified in § 10.30 except that the heading will be “Request to Participate in Forma Pauperis, Docket No. ____.” Filing and service requirements for the petition are described in paragraph (c) of this section, whether or not the petition is granted. The petition must demonstrate that either: ( 1 ) The person is indigent and a strong public interest justifies participation, or
( 2 ) the person's participation is in the public interest because it can be considered of primary benefit to the general public.
( c ) The Commissioner may grant or deny the petition. If the petition is granted, the participant need file only one copy of each submission with the Dockets Management Staff. TheDockets Management Staff will make sufficient additional copies for the administrative record, and serve a copy on each other participant.
EXHIBIT
      10.2

    


    July
      26, 2006

    


    Joseph
      E. Sarachek

    22
      Harvest Drive

    Scarsdale,
      New York 10583

    


    Dear
      Mr. Sarachek:

    


    Reference
      is made to the retention agreement, dated July 21, 2006, between PubliCARD,
      Inc.
      (the “Company”) and you (the “Retention Agreement”). Notwithstanding anything to
      the contrary in the Retention Agreement, you and the Company hereby acknowledge
      and agree that the effective date of your appointment as Chief Executive Officer
      of the Company shall be July 31, 2006.

    


    Except
      to the extent modified hereby, the Retention Agreement shall continue in full
      force and effect.

    


    Very
      truly yours,

    


    PubliCARD,
      Inc.

    


    By:
      /s/ Antonio L. DeLise

    


    Acknowledged
      and Agreed:

    


    /s/
      Joseph E. Sarachek

    Joseph
      E. Sarachek
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 2 (Tuesday, January 4, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 319]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-33177]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Maine Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that orientation and 
planning meetings of the Maine Advisory Committee to the Commission 
will convene at 10 a.m. on Tuesday, January 4, 2011, at the Avesta 
Conference Room, Immigrant Legal Advocacy Project, 309 Cumberland 
Avenue, Suite 201, Portland, ME 04112. The purpose of the orientation 
meeting is to provide ethics training and to describe the rules of 
operation for SAC activities to the Committee members. The purpose of 
the planning meeting is to review recent Commission and regional 
activities, discuss current civil rights issues in the State and to 
plan future activities.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments; the 
comments must be received in the regional office by February 4, 2011. 
The address is the Eastern Regional Office, 624 9th Street, NW., Suite 
740, Washington, DC 20425. Persons wishing to e-mail their comments, or 
who desire additional information should contact the Eastern Regional 
Office at 202-376-7533 or by e-mail to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4e2b3c210e3b3d2d2d3c60292138"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="583d2a37182d2b3b3b2a763f372e">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meetings and require 
the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional 
Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the 
meetings.
    Records generated from these meetings may be inspected and 
reproduced at the Eastern Regional Office, as they become available, 
both before and after the meetings. Persons interested in the work of 
this advisory committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, 
http://www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Eastern Regional Office at the 
above e-mail or street address.
    The meetings will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

Peter Minarik,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2010-33177 Filed 1-3-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# L_2018025EN.01000301.xml

| 30.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 25/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 25/3

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2018/138

of 16 January 2018

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Traditional Welsh Caerphilly’/‘Traditional Welsh Caerffili’ (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the United Kingdom's application to register the name ‘Traditional Welsh Caerphilly’/‘Traditional Welsh Caerffili’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the United Kingdom's application to register the name ‘Traditional Welsh Caerphilly’/‘Traditional Welsh Caerffili’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Traditional Welsh Caerphilly’/‘Traditional Welsh Caerffili’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Traditional Welsh Caerphilly’/‘Traditional Welsh Caerffili’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Traditional Welsh Caerphilly’/‘Traditional Welsh Caerffili’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.3. – Cheeses, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 January 2018.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 317, 23.9.2017, p. 10.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
#### § 3254.137 Who in the NEA may grant an exception to let an excluded person participate in a covered transaction?

The NEA Chairman has the authority to grant an exception to let an excluded person participate in a covered transaction, as provided in the OMB guidance at 2 CFR 180.135.
H. Res. 7

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

January 4, 2005.

Resolved, That pursuant to the Legislative Pay Act of

1929, as amended, the six minority employees authorized

therein shall be the following named persons, effective January 3, 2005, until otherwise ordered by the House, to-wit:

George Crawford, George Kundanis, Lorraine Miller,

Brendan Daly, Mike Sheehy and Arshi Siddiqui, each to receive gross compensation pursuant to the provisions of House

Resolution 119, Ninety-fifth Congress, as enacted into permanent law by section 115 of Public Law 95–94. In addition,

the Minority Leader may appoint and set the annual rate of

pay for up to three further minority employees.

Attest:

Clerk.
§ 7.10 The NRC Advisory Committee Management Officer. ( a ) The Chairman of the Commission or designee shall appoint an NRC Advisory Committee Management Officer to carry out the functions specified in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) The NRC Advisory Committee Management Officer shall— ( 1 ) Carry out all responsibilities relating to NRC advisory committees delegated to such officer by the Commission;
( 2 ) Ensure that administrative guidelines and management controls are issued that apply to all NRC advisory committees;
( 3 ) Exercise control and supervision over the establishment, procedures, and accomplishments of NRC advisory committees;
( 4 ) Assemble and maintain the reports, records, and other papers of any such committee during this existence;
( 5 ) Carry out, on behalf of the NRC, the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552) and implementing NRC regulations (10 CFR part 9, subpart A) with respect to such reports, records, and other papers;
( 6 ) Ensure that, subject to the Freedom of Information Act and implementing NRC regulations at 10 CFR part 9, subpart A, copies of the records, reports, transcript minutes, appendices, working papers, drafts, studies, agenda, or other documents that were made available to or prepared for or by each NRC advisory committee are available for public inspection and copying at the NRC Web site, *http://www.nrc.gov ,* at the NRC Public Document Room, or both, until the advisory committee ceases to exist;
( 7 ) Ensure that, subject to the Freedom of Information Act and implementing NRC regulations, at least eight copies of each report made by each NRC advisory committee and, where appropriate, background papers prepared by consultants, shall be filed with the Library of Congress;
( 8 ) Ensure that NRC keeps such records as will fully disclose the disposition of any funds that may be at the disposal of NRC advisory committees and the nature and extent of their activities; and
( 9 ) Ensure that NRC keeps such other records and provides such support services as are required by § 7.22.
( c ) For purposes of paragraph (b) of this section, the term “records” includes (but is not limited to): ( 1 ) A set of approved charters and membership lists for each NRC advisory committee;
( 2 ) Copies of NRC's portion of the Committee Management Secretariat Annual Comprehensive Review of Federal advisory committees required by section 7(b) of the Act;
( 3 ) NRC guidelines on committee management operations and procedures as maintained and updated; and
( 4 ) NRC determinations to close advisory committee meetings made pursuant to § 7.15.
[54 FR 26948, June 27, 1989; 54 FR 28554, July 6, 1989; 54 FR 31646, Aug. 1, 1989; 64 FR 48949, Sept. 9, 1999; 67 FR 79841, Dec. 31, 2002]
§ 3485.1018 Title IV, HEA transaction. A title IV, HEA transaction includes— ( a ) A disbursement or delivery of funds provided under a title IV, HEA program to a student or borrower;
( b ) A certification by an educational institution of eligibility for a loan under a title IV, HEA program;
( c ) Guaranteeing a loan made under a title IV, HEA program; and
( d ) The acquisition or exercise of any servicing responsibility for a grant, loan, or work study assistance under a title IV, HEA program.
(Authority: E.O. 12549 (3 CFR 1986 Comp., p.189); E.O. 12689 (3 CFR 1989 Comp., p.235); sec. 2455, Pub. L. 103-355, 108 Stat. 3327 (31 U.S.C. 6101 note); 20 U.S.C. 1082, 1094, 1221e-3, and 3474)
# L_2018066EN.01000101.xml

| 8.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 66/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 66/1

---

Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2018/302 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 February 2018 on addressing unjustified geo-blocking and other forms of discrimination based on customers' nationality, place of residence or place of establishment within the internal market and amending Regulations (EC) No 2006/2004 and (EU) 2017/2394 and Directive 2009/22/EC

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 60 I of 2 March 2018
  )

On page 14, in the concluding formula:

for:

‘
  For the European Parliament

The President

L. PAVLOVA

For the Council

The President

A. TAJANI
  ’,

read:

‘
  For the European Parliament

The President

A. TAJANI

For the Council

The President

L. PAVLOVA
  ’.

---