alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order issued October 6 

## 12. , 2012

In The 

### Tratrt of Appeats ffiftt! Elistrirt of
. rxas at Dallas

No. 05-12-00130-CV TECORE, INC., Appellant

V. AIRWALK COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Appellee



### ORDER We GRANT appellee's October 9, 2012 second unopposed motion for an extension of time to file a brief. Appellee shall file its brief on or before November 19, 2012. We caution appellee that no further extension of time will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances.
# EUR-Lex - 31993R1382 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31993R1382

**COMMISSION REGULATION (EEC) No 1382/93 of 4 June 1993 amending Regulation (EEC) No 3472/85 on the buying-in and storage of olive oil by intervention agencies **

*
Official Journal L 136 , 05/06/1993 P. 0023 - 0023 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 49 P. 0244 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 49 P. 0244 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EEC) No 1382/93 of 4 June 1993 amending Regulation (EEC) No 3472/85 on the buying-in and storage of olive oil by intervention agencies

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation No 136/66/EEC of 22 September 1966 on the establishment of a common organization of the market in oils and fats (1), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 2046/92 (2), and in particular Article 12 (4) thereof,

Whereas Article 2 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3472/85 (3), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 2310/92 (4), fixed the minimum quantity to be offered for intervention; whereas, in view of the structure of production in Greece and Portugal, different limits should be kept for those countries for the 1992/93 and 1993/94 marketing years;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Oils and Fats,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Regulation (EEC) No 3472/85 is hereby amended as follows:

1. In Article 2 (3), the words 'for the 1991/92 marketing year' are replaced by: 'for the 1991/92, 1992/93 and 1993/94 marketing years'.

2. In Article 8 (1), the words 'during the 1991/92 marketing year' are replaced by 'during the 1991/92, 1992/93 and 1993/94 marketing years'.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 4 June 1993.

For the Commission

René STEICHEN

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No 172, 30. 9. 1966, p. 3025/66.

(2) OJ No L 215, 30. 7. 1992, p. 1.

(3) OJ No L 333, 11. 12. 1985, p. 5.

(4) OJ No L 222, 7. 8. 1992, p. 23.
Hon. Parks E. McMiohael opinionNo. O-780 County Attorney Re: Whether nepotism law is Cass County violatedwhen the son of one Linden, Texas of the Board of Trustees of an independentsohool distriot is employedby the Board to Dear Sir: operate a school bus.

We are in receipt of your letter of May 6, 1939, wherein you advise that the Board of Trusteesof an independent school districthas employed the son of one of said trustees to operatea school bus in the transportation of ohildrento and from school,the driver~being paid directly out of the school fund of the district. You request our opinion as to whether this oonstitutes a violation of the nepotism law.

Article 432,,PenalCode, providesas follows:
"No officer of this State, or any officer of any district, *** school district, **+ or member of any school district, *** araated by or under authorityof any general or speaial law of this State, *** shall appoint or vot,e for or uonf'irm

the appointmentto any,*** position *** employmentor duty, of any person related within the seoond degree by affi~nity, or'withinthe third degree by oonsanguinity to the person so appointingor so voting, or to any other member of any such board *** of which such person so appointin or voting may be a member,whenthe salary,* * or compensation of f such appointeeis to be paid for, directlyor indirectly,out of or from public funds or fees of office of any kind or character whatsoever.ff Article 433, Penal Code, providesas follows: "The inhibitionsset forth in this law shall apply to and include *** public school trustees."Hon. Parks E. McMIchael,page 2,(0-780)

The case which you present falls squarelywithin Article 432. The son is related to the father by affinity in the first degree. The father is an officer of a school district,being a trustee thereof. The son is appointedto an employmentunderwhich his compensationis paid from public funds. Every element of said Article 432 is present, and our answer to your question is, therefore,in the affirmative.

Kindly permit us to express our appreciation for the brief furnishedto us. Yours very truly ATTORNEYGENERAL OF TBXAS By /s/Glenn R. Lewis Glenn R. Lewis, Assistant

APPRPVED: /s/ Gerald C. Mann ATTORNEYGENERAL OF TFXAS GRL:FG:wb
§ 2200.20 Does this part apply to me? This part and, through this part, pertinent portions of the OMB guidance in subparts A through I of 2 CFR part (see table at 2 CFR 180.100(b)) apply to you if you are a— ( a ) Participant or principal in a “covered transaction.” (see subpart B of 2 CFR part 180 and the definition of “nonprocurement transaction” at 2 CFR 180.970.
( b ) Respondent in a Corporation for National and Community Service suspension or debarment action;
( c ) Corporation for National and Community Service debarment or suspension official; or
( d ) Corporation for National and Community Service grants officer, agreements officer, or other official authorized to enter into any type of nonprocurement transaction that is a covered transaction.
#### § 3474.21 Severability.

If any provision of this part or its application to any person, act, or practice is held invalid, the remainder of the part or the application of its provisions to any person, act, or practice shall not be affected thereby.

[85 FR 82126, Dec. 17, 2020]
Itzhak
      Wulkan Ventures Ltd.

    23
      Golomb St.

    Raanana
      Israel 43303

    Tel:
      +972-97412535

    


     

    November
      6th
      2005

     

    Finder’s
      Fee Agreement

    


    An
      agreement signed between ITAC Inc (Israeli Technology Acquisition Company)
      and
      Itzhak Wulkan Ventures Ltd. on November 6th
      2005.

    


    
      	 	
              1.

            	
              ITAC
                will pay 1% (1 percent) fee, up to a cap of 330,000 USD , for an
                introduction of a company to be ITAC for Merger or
                Acquisition.

            


    

    
      	 	
              2.

            	
              The
                payment depends upon:

            


    

    
      	 	
              a.

            	
              The
                introduced company will close a transaction of Merger /Acquisition
                with
                ITAC.

            


    

    
      	 	
              b.

            	
              Approval
                of the transaction by : the BOD and shareholders of ITAC, SEC and
                NASDAQ

            


    

    
      	 	
              c.

            	
              The
                introduced company is not known to the management of
                ITAC.

            


    

    


    


    
      	 	
              /s/
                Itzhak Wulkan

            	
              /s/
                Israel Frieder 

            
	 	 	 
	 	 	
              /s/
                Dael Schnider

            
	 	 	 
	 	
              Itzhak
                Wulkan Ventures Ltd.

            	
              Israel
                Technology Acquisition Corp.
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 989 

Commending the United Kingdom for its efforts in the War on Terror, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 7, 2006 

Mr. POE submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on International Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Commending the United Kingdom for its efforts in the War 

on Terror, and for other purposes. 

Whereas on August 10, 2006, British police arrested 24 people for plotting to commit acts of terror on trans-Atlantic 

flights; 

Whereas as of August 31, 2006, 12 citizens have been 

charged for their roles in the terror plot, including eight 

citizens charge with conspiracy to murder; 

Whereas United Kingdom authorities acted swiftly and decisively to prevent a horrific attack on scores of innocent 

people; 

Whereas the United Kingdom and the United States have 

been close allies in not only two World Wars and Operation Desert Storm, but also the Global War on Terror; 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 989 IH 

Whereas the intelligence and military communities of the 

United Kingdom and the United States continue to work 

together to win the Global War on Terror; 

Whereas the threat of terrorism is a grave concern for all nations, regardless of geographical or other boundaries; 

Whereas acts of terror have profoundly affected citizens 

across the globe, including those in Bali, Turkey, India, 

the United Kingdom, and the United States; and 

Whereas victory in the Global War on Terror is a necessity 

to ensure the liberty and safety of all people: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) commends the law enforcement authorities 

3 of the United Kingdom on their action to prevent a 

4 terrible attack from occurring; 

5 (2) commends the intelligence community of the 

6 United Kingdom for its outstanding work in identi7 fying the citizens seeking to carry out this plot; 

8 (3) condemns those that would use acts of vio9 lence against innocent civilians to spread a message 

10 of hate and intolerance; and 

11 (4) urges the allies of the United States in the 

12 Global War on Terror to remain steadfast in the 

13 execution of this important mission. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
Editorial Note on Part 63
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 63 appear at 81 FR 86909, Dec. 2, 2016.

§ 63.61 Provision of information. ( a ) The Director shall provide the Governor and the Nevada State legislature, affected units of local government, and the governing body of any affected Indian Tribe, with timely and complete information regarding determinations or plans made by the Commission with respect to the Yucca Mountain site. Information must be provided concerning the site characterization, siting, development, design, licensing, construction, operation, regulation, permanent closure, or decontamination and dismantlement of surface facilities of the geologic repository operations area at the site.
( b ) Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this section, the Director is not required to distribute any document to any entity if, with respect to the document, that entity or its counsel is included on a service list prepared under part 2 of this chapter.
( c ) The NRC shall place communications by the Director under this section in the Publicly Available Records System (PARS) Library and furnish copies to DOE.
[66 FR 55792, Nov. 2, 2001, as amended at 68 FR 58815, Oct. 10, 2003]
**EXHIBIT23.1**

 

**Consentof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

** **

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (FormS-3 Nos. 333-84064, 333-43573, 333-89307 and 333-109658) of HospitalityProperties Trust and in the related Prospectuses of our reports dated March 3,2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule ofHospitality Properties Trust, Hospitality Properties Trust management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting ofHospitality Properties Trust, included in the 2005 Annual Report (Form 10-K)for the year ended December 31, 2005.

 
|                   | /s/  Ernst & Young LLP |   |
|------------------------|----------------------------|--------|
|                   |
| Boston,  Massachusetts |
| March  8, 2006         |

 

----
§ 2000.20 Does this part apply to me? This part and, through this part, pertinent portions of the OMB guidance in subparts A through I of 2 CFR part 180 (see table at 2 CFR 180.100(b)) apply to: ( a ) Participant or principal in a “covered transaction”;
( b ) Respondent in an NRC nonprocurement suspension or debarment action;
( c ) NRC debarment or suspension official; or
( d ) NRC grants officer, agreements officer, or other official authorized to enter into a covered nonprocurement transaction.
IV 

House Calendar No. 6 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 96 

[Report No. 109–7] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 5) to amend the procedures that 

apply to consideration of interstate class actions to assure fairer outcomes 

for class members and defendants, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2005 

Mr. GINGREY, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 5) to amend the 

procedures that apply to consideration of interstate class 

actions to assure fairer outcomes for class members and 

defendants, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution 

2 it shall be in order without intervention of any point of 

3 order to consider in the House the bill (S. 5) to amend 

4 the procedures that apply to consideration of interstate 

5 class actions to assure fairer outcomes for class members 

6 and defendants, and for other purposes. The bill shall be 
2 

HRES 96 RH 

1 considered as read. The previous question shall be consid2 ered as ordered on the bill and on any amendment thereto 

3 to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) 90 

4 minutes of debate on the bill equally divided and controlled 

5 by the chairman and ranking minority member of the 

6 Committee on the Judiciary; (2) the amendment in the 

7 nature of a substitute printed in the report of the Com8 mittee on Rules accompanying this resolution, if offered 

9 by Representative Conyers of Michigan or his designee, 

10 which shall be in order without intervention of any point 

11 of order, shall be considered as read, and shall be sepa12 rately debatable for 40 minutes equally divided and con13 trolled by the proponent and an opponent; and (3) one 

14 motion to commit with or without instructions. 

House Calendar No. 6 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 96 

[Report No. 109–7] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 5) to 

other purposes. comes for class members and defendants, and for of interstate class actions to assure fairer outamend the procedures that apply to consideration 

FEBRUARY 15, 2005 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed
P 

I 

x 

8 1 

2 

3 

♥ 

♥ 

♥ 

♥ 

♥ 

♥ 

♥ 

♥ 

korean · november 2002 
korean · november 2002
Exhibit No. 21.1


SUBSIDIARIES OF BNCCORP, INC.


The  following is a list of all  subsidiaries  of the Company,  including  their
state of incorporation or organization.


    Name                                       Incorporated In

    BNC National Bank                          National Bank

    BNC Insurance, Inc. (a subsidiary of
      BNC National Bank)

    BNC Asset Management, Inc.
      (a subsidiary of BNC National Bank)

    BNC National Bank of Arizona               National Bank



    Bismarck Properties, Inc.                  North Dakota

    BNC Capital Trust I                        Delaware Trust

    BNC Statutory Trust II                     Connecticut Trust
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JUAN CARLOS CHAVEZ GOMEZ,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 09-50246

D.C. No. 2:09-cr-00013-JFW-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

John F. Walter, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 27, 2011 ** 

Before: HAWKINS, SILVERMAN and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Juan Carlos Chavez Gomez appeals the sentence imposed following his

guilty plea to being an illegal alien found in the United States in violation of 8

U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

FILED

SEP 29 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
Gomez contends that the district court erred by determining that his prior

conviction for assault with a firearm, in violation of California Penal Code §

245(a)(2), constituted a crime of violence under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2, because section

245(a)(2) does not contain the requisite intent or use of force. Gomez concedes,

however, that this contention is foreclosed. See United States v. Grajeda, 581 F.3d

1186, 1191-97 (9th Cir. 2009); see also United States v. Heron-Salinas, 566 F.3d

898, 899 (9th Cir. 2009).

As Gomez further concedes, his contentions concerning Almendarez–Torres

are also foreclosed. See Grajeda, 581 F.3d at 1197 (holding that

Almendarez–Torres is binding unless it is expressly overruled by the Supreme

Court).

AFFIRMED.
#### § 1880.10 What does this part do?

This part adopts the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) guidance in subparts A through I of 2 CFR part 180, as supplemented by this part, as the NASA policies and procedures for nonprocurement debarment and suspension. It thereby gives regulatory effect for NASA to the OMB guidance as supplemented by this part. This part satisfies the requirements in section 3 of Executive Order 12549, “Debarment and Suspension” (3 CFR 1986 Comp., p. 189), Executive Order 12689, “Debarment and Suspension” (3 CFR 1989 Comp., p. 235) and 31 U.S.C. 6101 note (Section 2455, Public Law 103-355, 108 Stat. 3327).
Exhibit 32.1

# CERTIFICATION UNDER
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

The undersigned, the Chief
Executive Officer of Systemax Inc., hereby certifies that to the best of his
knowledge Systemax Inc.s Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2005
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 (o)(d)) and that the
information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Systemax Inc.

Dated:  March 30, 2007

/s/ RICHARD LEEDS
Richard Leeds, Chief Executive Officer
#### § 780.1010 Suspending Official (Agency for International Development supplement to government-wide definition at 2 CFR 180.1010).

The *Suspending Official* for USAID is the Assistant Administrator, Bureau for Management, or designee as delegated in Agency policy found in ADS 103—Delegations of Authority.

[80 FR 12916, Mar. 12, 2015]
§ 200.520 Criteria for a low-risk auditee. An auditee that meets all of the following conditions for each of the preceding two audit periods must qualify as a low-risk auditee and be eligible for reduced audit coverage in accordance with § 200.518. ( a ) Single audits were performed on an annual basis in accordance with the provisions of this Subpart, including submitting the data collection form and the reporting package to the FAC within the timeframe specified in § 200.512. A non-Federal entity that has biennial audits does not qualify as a low-risk auditee.
( b ) The auditor's opinion on whether the financial statements were prepared in accordance with GAAP, or a basis of accounting required by state law, and the auditor's in relation to opinion on the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards were unmodified.
( c ) There were no deficiencies in internal control which were identified as material weaknesses under the requirements of GAGAS.
( d ) The auditor did not report a substantial doubt about the auditee's ability to continue as a going concern.
( e ) None of the Federal programs had audit findings from any of the following in either of the preceding two audit periods in which they were classified as Type A programs: ( 1 ) Internal control deficiencies that were identified as material weaknesses in the auditor's report on internal control for major programs as required under § 200.515(c);
( 2 ) A modified opinion on a major program in the auditor's report on major programs as required under § 200.515(c); or
( 3 ) Known or likely questioned costs that exceeded five percent of the total Federal awards expended for a Type A program during the audit period.
[78 FR 78608, Dec. 26, 2013, as amended at 85 FR 49575, Aug. 13, 2020]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AT DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND THE AUDITED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 OF SYSTEMAX INC. AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                              17,470
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      200,082
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                        173,966
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   426,777
<PP&E>                                              46,839
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     549,962
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              239,886
<BONDS>                                              1,740
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               382
<OTHER-SE>                                         307,954
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       549,962
<SALES>                                          1,754,472
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,754,472
<CGS>                                            1,439,947
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,439,947
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   254,690
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    (688)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     60,523
<INCOME-TAX>                                        24,511
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 36,012
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        36,012
<EPS-BASIC>                                           1.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         1.01


</TABLE>
| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| August 13, 2010 |   | /s/ Evan Myrianthopoulos            |
|-----------------|--------|-------------------------------------|
|            |   | Evan Myrianthopoulos                |
|            |   | Chief Financial Officer             |
|            |   | (Principal Financial Officer)  |