94–842 PDF 

Calendar No. 637 

108TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! SENATE 2d Session 108–309 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION APPROPRIATION BILL, 2005 

JULY 15, 2004.—Ordered to be printed 

Mrs. HUTCHISON, from the Committee on Appropriations, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany S. 2674] 

The Committee on Appropriations reports the bill (S. 2674) making appropriations for military construction, family housing, and 

base realignment and closure for the Department of Defense for the 

fiscal year ending September 30, 2005, and for other purposes, reports favorably thereon and recommends that the bill do pass. 

Total of bill as reported to Senate ........................... $10,003,000,000 

Amount of 2005 budget estimate ............................ 9,553,375,000 

Amount of 2004 appropriations ............................... 9,316,000,000 

The bill as reported to the Senate: 

Over the budget estimate, 2005 ....................... 449,625,000 

Above appropriations for fiscal year 2004 ....... 687,000,000 
(2) 

C O N T E N T S 

Page 

Background: 

Purpose of the bill ............................................................................................ 3 

Comparative statement .................................................................................... 3 

Compliance with section 308 of the Budget Control Act ............................... 8 

Committee recommendation ................................................................................... 8 

Items of special interest .......................................................................................... 9 

Military construction, Army .................................................................................... 18 

Military construction, Navy .................................................................................... 18 

Military construction, Air Force ............................................................................. 19 

Military construction, Defense-wide ....................................................................... 21 

Military construction, Reserve components ........................................................... 24 

NATO Security Investment Program ..................................................................... 26 

Family housing overview ........................................................................................ 27 

Family housing, Army ............................................................................................. 27 

Family housing, Navy and Marine Corps .............................................................. 29 

Family housing, Air Force ....................................................................................... 30 

Family housing, Defense-wide ................................................................................ 32 

Family housing improvement fund ........................................................................ 32 

Base realignment and closure account, part IV .................................................... 33 

General provisions ................................................................................................... 35 

Compliance with paragraph 7, rule XVI of the Standing Rules of the Senate ... 36 

Compliance with paragraph 7(c), rule XXVI of the Standing Rules of the 

Senate ................................................................................................................... 36 

Compliance with paragraph 12, rule XXVI of the Standing Rules of the 

Senate ................................................................................................................... 37 

Project listing by location ........................................................................................ 38 
(3) 

BACKGROUND 

PURPOSE OF THE BILL

The Military Construction appropriation bill provides necessary 

funding for the planning, design, construction, alteration, and improvement of military facilities worldwide, both for Active and Reserve Forces. It also finances the construction, alteration, improvement, operation, and maintenance of military family housing, including payments against past housing mortgage indebtedness. 

Certain types of community impact assistance may be provided, as 

well as assistance to members of the military who face loss on the 

sale of private residences due to installation realignments and closures. The bill is also the source for the U.S. share of the NATO 

Security Investment Program. In addition, the bill provides funding 

to implement base closures and realignments authorized by law. 

COMPARATIVE STATEMENT

The Committee recommends appropriations totaling $10,003,000,000 for fiscal year 2005 military construction, family 

housing, and base closure. The following table displays the Committee recommendation in comparison with the current fiscal year, 

and the President’s fiscal year 2005 request. 
4 

COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET (OBLIGATIONAL) AUTHORITY 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Item 2004 enacted Budget estimate Committee rec- ommendation 

Increase (∂) or decrease (¥) compared 

with— 

2004 enacted Budget estimate 

Military construction, Army .................................................................................................................... 1,448,239 1,771,285 1,977,166 ∂528,927 ∂205,881 

Rescissions .................................................................................................................................... ¥183,615 ................................ ................................ ∂183,615 ................................Emergency appropriations (Public Law 108–106) ........................................................................ 162,100 ................................ ................................ ¥162,100 ................................

Total .......................................................................................................................................... 1,426,724 1,771,285 1,977,166 ∂550,442 ∂205,881 

Military construction, Navy ..................................................................................................................... 1,238,458 1,060,455 1,016,315 ¥222,143 ¥44,140 

Rescissions .................................................................................................................................... ¥45,622 ................................ ................................ ∂45,622 ................................Emergency appropriations (Public Law 108–106) ........................................................................ 45,530 ................................ ................................ ¥45,530 ................................

Total .......................................................................................................................................... 1,238,366 1,060,455 1,016,315 ¥222,051 ¥44,140 

Military construction, Air Force .............................................................................................................. 1,067,751 663,964 841,131 ¥226,620 ∂177,167 

Rescission ...................................................................................................................................... ¥23,000 ................................ ................................ ∂23,000 ................................Emergency appropriations (Public Law 108–106) ........................................................................ 292,550 ................................ ................................ ¥292,550 ................................

Total .......................................................................................................................................... 1,337,301 663,964 841,131 ¥496,170 ∂177,167 

Military construction, Defense-wide ....................................................................................................... 653,656 709,337 696,491 ∂42,835 ¥12,846 

Rescission ...................................................................................................................................... ¥72,309 ................................ ................................ ∂72,309 ................................

Total .......................................................................................................................................... 581,347 709,337 696,491 ∂115,144 ¥12,846 Total, Active components .......................................................................................................... 4,583,738 4,205,041 4,531,103 ¥52,635 ∂326,062 

Military construction, Army National Guard ........................................................................................... 311,592 295,657 381,765 ∂70,173 ∂86,108 Military construction, Air National Guard .............................................................................................. 222,908 127,368 231,083 ∂8,175 ∂103,715 Military construction, Army Reserve ....................................................................................................... 88,451 87,070 66,325 ¥22,126 ¥20,745 Military construction, Naval Reserve ..................................................................................................... 45,498 25,285 33,735 ¥11,763 ∂8,450 Military construction, Air Force Reserve ................................................................................................ 62,032 84,556 101,373 ∂39,341 ∂16,817 

Total, Reserve components ....................................................................................................... 730,481 619,936 814,281 ∂83,800 ∂194,345 Total, Military construction ....................................................................................................... 5,314,219 4,824,977 5,345,384 ∂31,165 ∂520,407 

Appropriations .................................................................................................................. (5,138,585 ) (4,824,977 ) (5,345,384 ) (∂206,799 ) (∂520,407 ) 
5 

Rescissions ...................................................................................................................... (¥324,546 ) ................................ ................................ (∂324,546 ) ................................

North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program ......................................................... 169,300 165,800 165,800 ¥3,500 ................................

Rescission ...................................................................................................................................... ¥8,000 ................................ ................................ ∂8,000 ................................

Total .......................................................................................................................................... 161,300 165,800 165,800 ∂4,500 ................................

Family housing construction, Army ........................................................................................................ 383,591 636,099 636,099 ∂252,508 ................................

Rescission ...................................................................................................................................... ¥94,151 ................................ ................................ ∂94,151 ................................

Total .......................................................................................................................................... 289,440 636,099 636,099 ∂346,659 ................................

Family housing operation and maintenance, Army ............................................................................... 1,033,026 928,907 928,907 ¥104,119 ................................

Emergency appropriations (Public Law 108–106) ........................................................................ 11,420 ................................ ................................ ¥11,420 ................................

Total .......................................................................................................................................... 1,044,446 928,907 928,907 ¥115,539 ................................

Family housing construction, Navy and Marine Corps .......................................................................... 184,193 139,107 139,107 ¥45,086 ................................

Rescission ...................................................................................................................................... ¥40,508 ................................ ................................ ∂40,508 ................................

Total .......................................................................................................................................... 143,685 139,107 139,107 ¥4,578 ................................

Family housing operation and maintenance, Navy and Marine Corps ................................................. 835,078 704,504 704,504 ¥130,574 ................................

Emergency appropriations (Public Law 108–106) ........................................................................ 6,280 ................................ ................................ ¥6,280 ................................

Total .......................................................................................................................................... 841,358 704,504 704,504 ¥136,854 ................................

Family housing construction, Air Force .................................................................................................. 657,065 846,959 846,959 ∂189,894 ................................

Rescission ...................................................................................................................................... ¥19,347 ................................ ................................ ∂19,347 ................................

Total .......................................................................................................................................... 637,718 846,959 846,959 ∂209,241 ................................

Family housing operation and maintenance, Air Force ......................................................................... 816,074 863,896 856,114 ∂40,040 ¥7,782 

Emergency appropriations (Public Law 108–106) ........................................................................ 6,981 ................................ ................................ ¥6,981 ................................

Total .......................................................................................................................................... 823,055 863,896 856,114 ∂33,059 ¥7,782 

Family housing construction, Defense-wide .......................................................................................... 350 49 49 ¥301 ................................Family housing operation and maintenance, Defense-wide .................................................................. 49,440 49,575 49,575 ∂135 ................................Department of Defense Family Housing Improvement Fund ................................................................. 300 2,500 2,500 ∂2,200 ................................

Rescission ...................................................................................................................................... ¥9,692 ................................ ................................ ∂9,692 ................................
6 

COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET (OBLIGATIONAL) AUTHORITY—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Item 2004 enacted Budget estimate Committee rec- ommendation 

Increase (∂) or decrease (¥) compared 

with— 

2004 enacted Budget estimate 

Total .......................................................................................................................................... ¥9,392 2,500 2,500 ∂11,892 ................................Total, Family housing ............................................................................................................... 3,820,100 4,171,596 4,163,814 ∂343,714 ¥7,782 

Chemical demilitarization construction, Defense .................................................................................. 119,815 81,886 81,886 ¥37,929 ................................Base realignment and closure account ................................................................................................. 370,427 246,116 246,116 ¥124,311 ................................General provision (sec. 118) .................................................................................................................. 55,000 63,000 ................................ ¥55,000 ¥63,000 

Grand total: 

New budget (obligational) authority ................................................................................ 9,840,861 9,553,375 10,003,000 ∂162,139 ∂449,625 

Appropriations ......................................................................................................... (9,812,244 ) (9,553,375 ) (10,003,000 ) (∂190,756 ) (∂449,625 ) Emergency appropriations ...................................................................................... (524,861 ) ................................ ................................ (¥524,861 ) ................................Rescissions ............................................................................................................. (¥496,244 ) ................................ ................................ (∂496,244 ) ................................

SUMMARY OF APPROPRIATIONS ACCOUNTS 

Military Construction, Army .................................................................................................................... 1,426,724 1,771,285 1,977,166 ∂550,442 ∂205,881 Military Construction, Navy .................................................................................................................... 1,238,366 1,060,455 1,016,315 ¥222,051 ¥44,140 Military Construction, Air Force .............................................................................................................. 1,337,301 663,964 841,131 ¥496,170 ∂177,167 Military Construction, Defense-wide ...................................................................................................... 581,347 709,337 696,491 ∂115,144 ¥12,846 

Total, Active components .......................................................................................................... 4,583,738 4,205,041 4,531,103 ¥52,635 ∂326,062 

Military Construction, Army National Guard .......................................................................................... 311,592 295,657 381,765 ∂70,173 ∂86,108 Military Construction, Air National Guard .............................................................................................. 222,908 127,368 231,083 ∂8,175 ∂103,715 Military Construction, Army Reserve ...................................................................................................... 88,451 87,070 66,325 ¥22,126 ¥20,745 Military Construction, Naval Reserve ..................................................................................................... 45,498 25,285 33,735 ¥11,763 ∂8,450 Military Construction, Air Force Reserve ................................................................................................ 62,032 84,556 101,373 ∂39,341 ∂16,817 

Total, Reserve components ....................................................................................................... 730,481 619,936 814,281 ∂83,800 ∂194,345 Total, Military Construction ...................................................................................................... 5,314,219 4,824,977 5,345,384 ∂31,165 ∂520,407 
7 

North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program ......................................................... 161,300 165,800 165,800 ∂4,500 ................................Family Housing, Army: 

Construction .................................................................................................................................. 289,440 636,099 636,099 ∂346,659 ................................Operation and Maintenance .......................................................................................................... 1,044,446 928,907 928,907 ¥115,539 ................................

Total, Family Housing, Army ..................................................................................................... 1,333,886 1,565,006 1,565,006 ∂231,120 ................................

Family Housing, Navy and Marine Corps: 

Construction .................................................................................................................................. 143,685 139,107 139,107 ¥4,578 ................................Operation and Maintenance .......................................................................................................... 841,358 704,504 704,504 ¥136,854 ................................

Total, Family Housing, Navy and Marine Corps ....................................................................... 985,043 843,611 843,611 ¥141,432 ................................

Family Housing, Air Force: 

Construction .................................................................................................................................. 637,718 846,959 846,959 ∂209,241 ................................Operation and Maintenance .......................................................................................................... 823,055 863,896 856,114 ∂33,059 ¥7,782 

Total, Family Housing, Air Force ............................................................................................... 1,460,773 1,710,855 1,703,073 ∂242,300 ¥7,782 

Family Housing, Defense-wide: 

Construction .................................................................................................................................. 350 49 49 ¥301 ................................Operation and Maintenance .......................................................................................................... 49,440 49,575 49,575 ∂135 ................................

Total, Family Housing, Defense-wide ....................................................................................... 49,790 49,624 49,624 ¥166 ................................

Department of Defense Family Housing Improvement Fund ................................................................. ¥9,392 2,500 2,500 ∂11,892 ................................

Total, Family Housing ............................................................................................................... 3,820,100 4,171,596 4,163,814 ∂343,714 ¥7,782 

Chemical demilitarization construction, Defense .................................................................................. 119,815 81,886 81,886 ¥37,929 ................................Base Realignment and Closure Account ............................................................................................... 370,427 246,116 246,116 ¥124,311 ................................General provision .................................................................................................................................... 55,000 63,000 ................................ ¥55,000 ¥63,000 

Grand Total ............................................................................................................................... 9,840,861 9,553,375 10,003,000 ∂162,139 ∂449,625 
8 

COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 308 OF THE BUDGET CONTROL ACT

Section 308(a) of the Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 

1974 (Public Law 93–344) requires that the Committee include in 

its report a comparison of its recommendations with levels contained in the first concurrent resolution. Appropriate data are reflected below: 

BUDGETARY IMPACT OF BILL 

PREPARED IN CONSULTATION WITH THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE PURSUANT TO SEC. 

308(a), PUBLIC LAW 93–344, AS AMENDED 

[In millions of dollars] 

Budget authority Outlays 

Committee 

allocation 1

Amount 

of bill 

Committee 

allocation 1

Amount 

of bill 

Comparison of amounts in the bill with Committee allocations 

to its subcommittees of amounts in the Budget Resolution 

for 2005: Subcommittee on Military Construction: 

Discretionary ........................................................................ NA 10,003 NA 1 9,995 

Projection of outlays associated with the recommendation: 

2005 ..................................................................................... .................... .................... .................... 2 2,438 

2006 ..................................................................................... .................... .................... .................... 3,591 

2007 ..................................................................................... .................... .................... .................... 2,244 

2008 ..................................................................................... .................... .................... .................... 939 

2009 and future years ........................................................ .................... .................... .................... 669 

Financial assistance to State and local governments for 

2005 ......................................................................................... NA .................... NA ....................

1 Includes outlays from prior-year budget authority. 

2 Excludes outlays from prior-year budget authority. 

NA: Not applicable. 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommends new fiscal year 2005 appropriations 

of $10,003,000,000. This is $449,625,000 over the budget request, 

and $687,000,000 above the appropriations for fiscal year 2004. 

The basis for this recommendation is contained in the following 

‘‘Items of special interest,’’ and under the discussions pertaining to 

each individual appropriation. Complete project detail is provided 

in the tables at the end of the report. 
(9) 

ITEMS OF SPECIAL INTEREST 

HEARINGS

The Subcommittee on Military Construction held two hearings on 

the fiscal year 2005 budget request. On March 30, 2004, the subcommittee heard testimony from representatives of the Department 

of Defense and the United States Air Force concerning fiscal year 

2005 budget priorities, base realignment and closure [BRAC], and 

the impending restructuring of United States military facilities 

overseas. On April 7, 2004 the subcommittee held a hearing on the 

budget requests of the United States Army and United States 

Navy. 

SUMMARY OF COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

The budget request for fiscal year 2005 reflects an increase of $237,375,000 from the amount enacted in fiscal year 2004. The Committee recommends an additional $449,625,000 above 

the fiscal year 2005 budget request. The total recommended appropriation for fiscal year 2005 is $10,003,000,000, an increase of 

$687,000,000 from fiscal year 2004 funding. 

OVERSEAS MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

The Committee continues to be concerned about expenditures for 

military facilities outside the United States. The report accompanying the fiscal year 2004 Military Construction Appropriations 

bill noted that the Department of Defense was more than a year 

overdue in reporting to this Committee on its overseas basing master plan. In the face of great uncertainty over future basing, the 

Committee declined funding for numerous overseas construction 

projects. 

A year later, the master plan still has not been received, and the 

Department has yet to announce the results of its global basing 

and presence study. The Committee recognizes the Department’s 

efforts, in the absence of a completed plan, to reduce somewhat its 

request for overseas construction, and concurs with that decision. 

However, in the face of continued uncertainty about the future of 

the U.S. military presence overseas, the Committee recommends 

against funding several construction projects outside the United 

States. The Committee looks forward to the opportunity to carefully consider the Department’s plans, once they are released, as 

well as the report of the Commission on the Review of the Overseas 

Military Facility Structure of the United States. 

OVERSEAS BASING COMMISSION

The fiscal year 2004 Military Construction Appropriations Act 

(Public Law 108–132) created the Commission on Review of Overseas Military Facility Structure of the United States (the Overseas 
10 

Basing Commission) to provide Congress an independent assessment of the Nation’s requirement for overseas military bases. The 

Commission’s final report to the Congress and the President will 

help inform the Base Realignment and Closure [BRAC] process, 

congressional consideration of the Department’s global basing and 

presence plan, and congressional consideration of the fiscal year 

2006 military construction appropriations request. 

Although the Department expressed its opposition to creation of 

the Commission, the Commission became law when the President 

signed the fiscal year 2004 Military Construction Appropriations 

Act on November 22, 2003. The law provides that ‘‘the Commission 

may secure directly from any Federal department or agency such 

information as the Commission considers necessary . . .’’. The law 

also provides authority for the Department of Defense to detail to 

the Commission any employee, without compensation. Regardless 

of the Department’s original antipathy, the Commission is law and 

the Committee expects the Defense Department’s full cooperation 

with the Commission on these and all matters provided for in the 

authorizing legislation. 

Because of delays in the appointment of commissioners, the establishment of suitable Commission facilities, and the submission 

to the Congress of the Department’s global basing and presence 

plan, the deadline for the Commission’s final report is extended to 

August 15, 2005. This will make the Commission’s life coterminal 

with its funding, which under current law expires September 30, 

2005, and will provide an opportunity for the Commission to interact with the Base Closure and Realignment Commission, whose 

members need not be appointed until March 15, 2005. However, in 

order to inform both BRAC and consideration of the fiscal year 

2006 military construction appropriations bill, the committee urges 

the Overseas Basing Commission to present its preliminary conclusions to the Congress no later than March 31, 2005. 

UNPROGRAMMED PROJECTS

The Committee is greatly concerned about the increasing frequency with which the Department has submitted requests for outof-cycle and over-threshold construction projects purporting to rectify ‘‘life/safety/health’’ deficiencies. This justification has been used 

especially often to justify projects, such as new gates or large vehicle inspection facilities, intended to correct anti-terrorism/force protection [ATFP] deficiencies. 

The Committee fully recognizes the need to improve security and 

provide adequate protection to personnel working and living on 

military installations. In the fiscal year 2002 supplemental appropriation for the Department of Defense, the Committee provided 

broad authority to expend appropriations from the Defense Emergency Response Fund [DERF] for just such military construction 

projects, including some $113,000,000 for access control initiatives 

identified by the Department. 

However, as reiterated in the Senate Armed Services Committee 

report accompanying the fiscal year 2004 National Defense Authorization Act, the life/safety/health exception is intended solely for urgent construction projects addressing deficiencies whose sudden 

emergence could not have been anticipated and which pose so im-
11 

mediate a threat to the life, safety, or health of personnel that their 

correction cannot wait until the next appropriation cycle. The exception is not intended as a catch-all provision enabling the Department to use excess funds for miscellaneous projects for which 

it has failed to properly program. Unfortunately, the Department 

appears to view the provision in just such a way as it has submitted numerous projects under the rubric of life/safety/health that 

do not meet these criteria. For example: 

—The Navy cited this provision as justification for building a 

shooting range in Bahrain, on the theory that sailors not properly trained in small arms would be unable to carry out their 

defensive mission, thus endangering their lives and those of 

their comrades. While the Committee firmly believes in providing adequate resources to support training requirements, 

there is virtually no construction project—tank ranges, aircraft 

simulators, recruit training barracks—which could not be justified under such an expansive definition of ‘‘life/safety/health.’’ 

Such an expansive reading renders the exception meaningless. 

—The Air Force notified the Committee in June 2004—three 

quarters of the way through fiscal year 2004—of its intent to 

correct ‘‘life/safety/health’’ ATFP deficiencies that ‘‘were identified and fully defined in mid fiscal year 2003.’’ If these deficiencies truly posed an immediate threat to the life, safety or 

health of personnel, the Air Force was woefully negligent in 

waiting 15 months to correct them. The Committee prefers to 

believe that the Air Force is merely attempting to use this exception as a convenient excuse to meet a requirement for which 

it had not budgeted. 

—On April 9, 2003, the Department notified the Committee of its 

intent to expend $29,500,000 of DERF funds to improve gate 

security at seven Army bases in the United States. In February 2004, the Army cited ‘‘life/safety/health’’ as the authority 

to proceed with several of the same projects, asserting that the 

security deficiencies posed ‘‘unacceptable and imminent risk to 

personnel.’’ Asked why the projects had not been executed in 

accordance with the previous year’s notification, the Army explained that the Office of the Secretary of Defense had withdrawn the funding—without notifying Congress—to use it for 

other purposes. If the Department itself did not feel sufficient 

urgency to execute the projects nearly a year earlier, when it 

not only had the funding available but also had notified the 

Congress of its intention to proceed, it is difficult for the Committee to take seriously later claims of imminent life/safety/ 

health risks. 

Force protection is a serious matter; the Committee treats it as 

such and is committed to providing the resources necessary to adequately protect Department personnel. However, nearly 3 years 

after September 11, it is unthinkable that the Department continues to discover force protection deficiencies that require immediate remediation. Indeed, in light of the Committee’s appreciation 

for the capabilities and competence of the Department, it is not 

credible that the Department is unaware of such deficiencies and 

is unable to program for them. 
12 

The Department’s credibility is also becoming strained with respect to projects justified as ‘‘emergency’’ construction under Section 2803, Title 10, USC. This provision has been cited to justify 

unauthorized construction projects that the Department reasonably 

should have been able to anticipate and program for, or which are 

of questionable urgency. 

The Committee will scrutinize carefully any out-of-cycle construction projects justified on the basis of life/safety/health or emergency 

considerations to ensure there is compelling evidence that such 

projects meet these criteria. The Committee directs the Department to submit to congressional defense committees no later than 

December 31, 2004, a comprehensive list of outstanding 

antiterrorism/force protection construction requirements for United 

States military bases, including the location, project description, estimated cost, and fiscal year in which the project is expected to be 

funded. 

ANTI-TERRORIST/FORCE PROTECTION [ATFP] CONSTRUCTION

TECHNOLOGY

Revised ATFP standards have imposed significant additional requirements on military construction, including greater blast resistance, increased standoff distances, and resistance to chemical and 

biological weapons. These requirements make it imperative that 

the United States employs the most cost-effective technology to enhance the security of its military personnel. The Committee is 

aware that the Ministry of Defense of the United Kingdom has accepted for use a steel sandwich construction system comprising two 

steel plates separated by transverse steel bars and capable of being 

filled with various materials which provide a range of protection 

levels. The Committee directs the Department to examine the potential suitability of this technology for use in U.S. military construction and to report its findings to the Committee no later than 

December 31, 2004. 

STEEL FRAMING

The Committee understands that the Department currently uses 

cold-formed steel for the framing of both residential and non-residential construction projects in tropical and coastal regions. Steel 

is more resistant than other building materials to the hurricane, 

mold, rot, and insect problems indigenous to those areas. Further, 

steel is fire resistant, domestically produced, and can have lower 

life cycle costs. The Committee applauds the Department for its 

current use, and encourages the Department to expand the use of 

steel framing to other regions as well. 

BARRACKS CONSTRUCTION

The fiscal year 2005 budget request includes $1,035,895,000 to 

construct or modernize 35 barracks projects. 

The Committee recommends $1,015,145,000 for barracks construction projects in fiscal year 2005, a decrease of $20,750,000 

from the budget request. 
13 

CHARTER SCHOOLS

The Committee notes that the military housing privatization program has been very successful in improving the quality of housing 

for military families and has encouraged more military families 

with school age children to live on or adjacent to military installations. The Committee also recognizes that the privatization program can impact the demographics of the communities surrounding 

military installations, and has a potentially significant impact on 

some local school districts. In view of the current Base Realignment 

and Closure process and the Defense Department’s Global Posture 

Review, both of which could consolidate more military families at 

fewer installations, the Committee believes it is increasingly important to understand the impact of housing privatization on local 

educational resources. The privatization program has generated 

various approaches to address the resultant educational impact on 

local communities. One particularly innovative example is the charter school at the Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base, Belle 

Chasse, Louisiana. The Committee urges the Secretary of Defense 

to study the feasibility of using charter schools in conjunction with 

the privatization program to address military school requirements, 

and to explore the feasibility of using the Belle Chasse charter 

school as a model to be replicated in other parts of the country. 
14 

BARRACKS CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Location Service Installation Project Request Recommended 

Alaska .................................... Army .................................... Fort Richardson ......................... Barracks Complex (60 Person) .............................................................................. 7,600 7,600 

Army .................................... Fort Wainwright ......................... Barracks Complex—Lorraine Road (144 Person) ................................................. 39,815 39,815 Army .................................... Fort Wainwright ......................... Barracks Complex Renewal—Santiago Road (144 Person) ................................. 30,912 30,912 

Arizona ................................... Navy .................................... Yuma ......................................... Bachelor Enlisted Quarters (150 Room) ................................................................ 18,740 18,740 

Air Force ............................. Luke AFB ................................... Dormitory (120 Room) ............................................................................................ 10,000 10,000 

California ............................... Navy .................................... Camp Pendleton ........................ Bachelor Enlisted Quarters (200 Room) ................................................................ 19,975 19,975 Colorado ................................ Army .................................... Fort Carson ............................... Barracks Complex—Hospital Area (128 Person) .................................................. 14,108 14,108 Georgia .................................. Army .................................... Fort Benning ............................. Barracks Complex—Kelley Hill/Main Post (456 Person) ....................................... 49,565 49,565 

Army .................................... Fort Stewart .............................. Barracks Complex—5Th & 16Th St Ph 2 (336 Person) ....................................... 32,950 32,950 

Hawaii ................................... Army .................................... Schofield Barracks .................... Barracks Complex Renewal—Capron Ave Ph 3 (200 Person) .............................. 48,000 48,000 

Army .................................... Schofield Barracks .................... Barracks Complex—Quad E, Ph 2 (150 Person) .................................................. 36,000 36,000 

Illinois .................................... Navy .................................... Great Lakes ............................... RTC Barracks (1,056 Person) ................................................................................ 35,920 35,920 

Navy .................................... Great Lakes ............................... RTC Barracks (1,056 Person) ................................................................................ 38,851 38,851 

Kansas ................................... Army .................................... Fort Riley ................................... Barracks Complex Renewal (312 Person) ............................................................. 41,000 41,000 Kentucky ................................ Army .................................... Fort Campbell ........................... Barracks Complex—42Nd St/Indiana Ave Ph 1 (504 Person) ............................. 30,000 30,000 Louisiana ............................... Air Force ............................. Barksdale AFB ........................... Dormitory (168 Room) ............................................................................................ 13,800 13,800 Minnesota .............................. Air National Guard ............. Duluth IAP ................................. Air Sovereignty Alert—Crew Quarters (12 Person) ............................................... 3,000 3,000 New York ............................... Army .................................... Fort Drum .................................. Barracks Complex—Wheeler Sack AAF Ph 2 (480 Person) .................................. 48,000 48,000 North Carolina ....................... Army .................................... Fort Bragg ................................. Barracks Complex Renewal Blackjack St Ph 1 (200 Person) ............................... 49,000 49,000 

Army .................................... Fort Bragg ................................. Barracks Complex—Bastogne Dr Ph 2 (768 Person) ........................................... 48,000 48,000 Army .................................... Fort Bragg ................................. Barracks Complex—Donovan Street Ph 5 (240 Person) ...................................... 15,500 15,500 Navy .................................... New River .................................. Bachelor Enlisted Quarters (216 Room) ................................................................ 20,780 20,780 

Texas ..................................... Army .................................... Fort Hood ................................... Barracks Complex (480 Person) ............................................................................ 49,888 49,888 

Air Force ............................. Sheppard AFB ........................... Student Dormitory (300 Room) .............................................................................. 29,000 29,000 

Virginia .................................. Army .................................... Fort Myer ................................... Barracks Complex—Sheridan Ave Ph 1 (420 Person) .......................................... 49,526 49,526 

Navy .................................... Quantico .................................... Bachelor Enlisted Quarters (130 Room) ................................................................ 15,090 15,090 

Washington ............................ Army .................................... Fort Lewis .................................. Barracks Complex—41St Div Dr/B St Ph 2 (420 Person) .................................... 48,000 48,000 

Navy .................................... Bremerton .................................. BEQ—Shipboard Ashore (198 Room) [Phase I] .................................................... 34,125 34,125 

Bahamas ............................... Navy .................................... Andros Island ............................ Bachelor Quarters (76 Room) ................................................................................ 20,750 ........................Greenland .............................. Air Force ............................. Thule AB .................................... Dorm (72 Room) .................................................................................................... 19,800 19,800 Germany ................................ Army .................................... Grafenwoehr .............................. Barracks Complex .................................................................................................. 28,500 28,500 

Army .................................... Grafenwoehr .............................. Barracks Complex—Brigade ................................................................................. 34,000 34,000 

Korea ..................................... Air Force ............................. Kunsan AB ................................ Dormitory (144 Room) ............................................................................................ 18,550 18,550 
15 

Air Force ............................. Kunsan AB ................................ Dormitory (144 Room) ............................................................................................ 18,550 18,550 Air Force ............................. Osan AB .................................... Dormitory (156 Room) ............................................................................................ 18,600 18,600 

Total ......................... ............................................. ................................................... ................................................................................................................................. 1,035,895 1,015,145 

Army Total ............................. ............................................. ................................................... ................................................................................................................................. 700,364 700,364 Navy Total ............................. ............................................. ................................................... ................................................................................................................................. 204,231 183,481 Air Force Total ....................... ............................................. ................................................... ................................................................................................................................. 128,300 128,300 Air National Guard Total ....... ............................................. ................................................... ................................................................................................................................. 3,000 3,000 
16 

CONFORMANCE WITH AUTHORIZATION BILL

The Committee strongly supports the authorization-appropriation 

process. However, the Committee has reported the appropriation 

bill prior to completion of the authorization process. Therefore, the 

Committee has provided construction funds for specific projects 

which were included in the Senate version of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005. 

REPROGRAMMING RULES/CRITERIA

The following rules apply for all military construction and family 

housing reprogrammings. A project or account (including the subelements of an account) which has been specifically reduced by the 

Congress in acting on the appropriation request is considered to be 

a congressional interest item. A prior approval reprogramming is 

required for any increase to an item that has been specifically reduced by the Congress. Accordingly, no below threshold 

reprogrammings to an item specifically reduced by the Congress 

are permitted. 

The reprogramming criteria that apply to military construction 

projects (25 percent of the funded amount or $2,000,000, whichever 

is less) continue to apply to new housing construction projects and 

to improvements over $2,000,000. To provide the individual Services the flexibility to proceed with construction contracts without 

disruption or delay, the costs associated with environmental hazard 

remediation such as asbestos removal, radon abatement, lead-based 

paint removal or abatement, and any other legislated environmental hazard remediation may be excluded, provided that such remediation requirements could not be reasonably anticipated at the 

time of budget submission. This exclusion applies to projects authorized in the budget year, and also projects authorized in prior 

years for which construction contracts have not been completed. 

Furthermore, in instances where a prior approval reprogramming request for a project or account has been approved by the 

Committee, the amount approved becomes the new base for any future increase or decrease via below threshold reprogrammings (provided that the project or account is not a congressional interest 

item). 

REAL PROPERTY MAINTENANCE REPORTING REQUIREMENT

The Committee recommends a continuation of the following general rules for repairing a facility under Operations and Maintenance account funding: 

Components of the facility may be repaired by replacement, and 

such replacement can be up to current standards or code. 

Interior arrangements and restorations may be included as repair, but additions, new facilities, and functional conversions must 

be performed as military construction projects. 

Such projects may be done concurrent with repair projects, as 

long as the final conjunctively funded project is a complete and usable facility. 

The appropriate Service Secretary shall submit a 21-day notification prior to carrying out any repair project with an estimated cost 

in excess of $7,500,000. 
17 

The Department is directed to continue to provide the real property maintenance backlog at all installations for which there is a 

requested construction project in future budget requests. This information is to be provided on Form 1390. In addition, for all troop 

housing requests, the Form 1391 is to continue to show all real 

property maintenance conducted in the past 2 years and all future 

requirements for unaccompanied housing at that installation. 
(18) 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, ARMY

Appropriations, 2004 ............................................................................. $1,426,724,000 

Budget estimate, 2005 ........................................................................... 1,771,285,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 1,977,166,000 

The Committee recommends $1,977,166,000 for the Army for fiscal year 2005. This is an increase of $205,881,000 over the budget 

request for fiscal year 2005. (See State tables at the end of the report for complete program recommendations.) 

The Committee fully expects contracts for the following projects 

to be awarded, as early in fiscal year 2005 as practical: 

Ammunition Igloo Door Installation, Toole Army Depot, UT.—Of 

the funds provided for unspecified minor construction in this account, the Committee directs that $1,400,000 be made available for 

this project. 

Facilities Upgrade, Camp Rudder, Eglin AFB, FL.—Of the funds 

provided for planning and design in this account, the Committee 

directs that $365,000 be made available for the design of this facility. 

MacGregor Range Tank Bypass, Holloman AFB, NM.—Of the 

funds provided for planning and design in this account, the Committee directs that $1,656,000 be made available for the design of 

this facility. 

Soldier Service Center, Fort Campbell, KY.—This project, currently programmed for fiscal year 2009, will consolidate soldier 

support facilities under one roof. During the 101st Airborne Division’s deployment and redeployment in support of Operation Iraqi 

Freedom, these activities were spread out over numerous locations 

and required a physical fitness center to be shut down in order to 

serve as a soldier processing center. This facility will improve 

greatly the power projection capabilities of the 101st Airborne by 

enhancing their ability to prepare and process individual soldiers 

to deploy out of Fort Campbell. The Committee strongly urges the 

Army to move this project forward to fiscal year 2006. 

Taxiway Improvements, Godman Army Airfield, Fort Knox, KY.— 

Of the funds provided for unspecified minor construction in this account, the Committee directs that $940,000 be made available for 

completion of this project. 

Woodlawn Road Relocation, Fort Belvoir, VA.—Of the funds provided for planning and design in this account, the Committee directs that $1,890,000 be made available for the design of this 

project. 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, NAVY

Appropriations, 2004 ............................................................................. $1,238,366,000 

Budget estimate, 2005 ........................................................................... 1,060,455,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 1,016,315,000 
19 

The Committee recommends $1,016,315,000 for Navy and Marine 

Corps military construction for fiscal year 2005. This amount is a 

decrease of $44,140,000 from the fiscal year 2005 budget request. 

(See State tables at the end of the report for complete program recommendations.) 

The Committee fully expects contracts for the following project to 

be awarded, as early in fiscal year 2005 as practical: 

Waterfront Operations Facilities, Kaneohe Bay, HI.—Of the funds 

provided for planning and design in this account, the Committee 

directs that $600,000 be made available for the design of these facilities. 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, AIR FORCE

Appropriations, 2004 ............................................................................. $1,337,301,000 

Budget estimate, 2005 ........................................................................... 663,964,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 841,131,000 

The Committee recommends $841,131,000 for the Air Force in 

fiscal year 2005. This is an increase of $177,167,000 from the fiscal 

year 2005 budget request. (See State tables at the end of the report 

for complete program recommendations.) 

SPANGDAHLEM AIR BASE, GERMANY

Spangdahlem Air Base, Germany, currently hosts an Air Force 

fighter wing and is an integral part of the program to move airlift 

capabilities from Rhein Main Air Base. The future of the fighter 

presence at Spangdahlem is uncertain in light of the Department’s 

ongoing global basing and presence review, but given significant investments made under the Rhein Main Transition Program, a continued U.S. presence at this base is likely. Increased military construction requirements are already forcing an expansion into areas 

northwest of the base, and future plans call for the potential acquisition of still more land outside the base’s current boundaries. However, significant acreage around the Spangdahlem flight line is occupied by aging hardened shelters in which fighter aircraft are 

housed. These shelters provide substandard work space, are expensive to maintain, and are arrayed to enhance the security of the 

aircraft, not to maximize the utilization of space. A legacy of the 

cold war, the aircraft shelters may not be appropriate to current 

and projected military requirements; demolishing them and putting 

the space to better use may be a more cost-effective alternative to 

further expansion of the base. The Committee directs the Air Force 

to examine this alternative, given projected military requirements 

at Spangdahlem, and report its findings to the congressional defense committees no later than January 31, 2005. 

SCOTT AIR FORCE BASE, ILLINOIS

The Committee is aware of new and expanded missions at Scott 

Air Force Base [IL], including procurement of C–40C aircraft to be 

flown by the 932nd Airlift Wing with the 375th Air Wing as an active associate and the transfer of C–9C aircraft from Andrews Air 

Force Base [MD] to Scott AFB. The expanded C–9 mission and the 

new C–40 mission will tax U.S. TRANSCOM and Tanker Airlift 

Command Center headquarters and require additional administra-
20 

tive and operations space/structures. The Committee recognizes the 

importance of Scott Air Force Base to our national defense. In 

order to accommodate additional capacity at the Base and fully 

support the new and expanded missions, the Committee directs the 

Air Force to pursue options, including consideration of an agreement with St. Clair County, Illinois, to expedite the construction of 

joint administrative and operations structures at Scott Air Force 

Base. 

The Committee fully expects contracts for the following projects 

to be awarded, as early in fiscal year 2005 as practical: 

Clear Rinse Facility, Hickam AFB, HI.—Of the funds provided 

for planning and design in this account, the Committee directs that 

$92,000 be made available for the design of this facility. 

Joint Regional Combat Arms Training Center, Hickam AFB, 

HI.—Of the funds provided for planning and design in this account, the Committee directs that $693,000 be made available for the design of this training center. 

Land Acquisition, Dover Air Force Base, DE.—Of the funds provided for unspecified minor construction in this account, the Committee directs that $740,000 be made available for this land acquisition. 

Main/Satellite Fire/Crash Rescue Station, Hickam AFB, HI.—Of 

the funds provided for planning and design in this account, the 

Committee directs that $1,340,000 be made available for the design 

of this rescue station. This is an urgent requirement, and the Committee urges the Air Force to retain it in the fiscal year 2006 budget submission. 

Parking Structure, Los Angeles AFB, CA.—Of the funds provided 

for planning and design in this account, the Committee directs that 

$640,000 be made available for the design of this structure. 

Port of Anchorage Stryker Access Road, Elmendorf AFB/Fort 

Richardson, AK.—Of the funds provided for planning and design in this account, the Committee directs that $2,000,000 be made available for the design of this project. 

Propulsion Energetics Science Laboratory, Edwards AFB, CA.— 

Of the funds provided for planning and design in this account, the 

Committee directs that $1,314,000 be made available for the design 

of this laboratory. 

Visiting Airmen’s Quarters, Elemendorf AFB, AK.—Of the funds 

provided for planning and design in this account, the Committee 

directs that $140,000 be made available for the design of this facility. 

Water Treatment Facility, Indian Springs Air Force Auxiliary 

Field, NV.—The committee directs the Air Force to conduct a study 

on the feasibility of constructing a waste water treatment facility 

in Indian Springs, Nevada, and report to the congressional defense 

committees no later than December 31, 2004. The study should be 

conducted jointly with the Clark County Water Reclamation District and the township of Indian Springs, Nevada. The study should 

take into account the proposed expansion of the Air Force mission 

at Indian Springs Auxiliary Field, as well as the long term needs 

of the community. Efficiencies and cost savings resulting from a 

jointly constructed and managed facility should be explored in detail. 
21 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, DEFENSE-WIDE

Appropriations, 2004 ............................................................................. $581,347,000 

Budget estimate, 2005 ........................................................................... 709,337,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 696,491,000 

The Committee recommends $696,491,000 for projects considered 

within the ‘‘Defense-wide’’ account. The amount recommended is a 

decrease of $12,846,000 from the fiscal year 2005 budget request. 

(See State tables at the end of the report for complete program recommendations.) 

The Committee fully expects contracts for the following project to 

be awarded, as early in fiscal year 2005 as possible: 

Special Operations Forces Cold Weather Training Facility, Kodiak Island, AK.—Of the funds provided for planning and design 

in this account, the Committee directs that $720,000 be made 

available for the design of this facility. 

MEDICAL CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM

The fiscal year 2005 budget request includes $183,138,000 for 

nine major construction projects. The Committee recommends a 

total of $187,838,000 for 10 projects, an increase of $4,700,000. 
22 

MEDICAL CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Location Service Installation Project Request Recommended 

Alaska .................................... Defense Wide ...................... Fort Wainwright ......................... Hospital Replacement Phase VI ............................................................................ 9,900 9,900 California ............................... Air National Guard ............. Fresno-Yosemite Int’l Airport .... Medical Training & Security Forces Complex ........................................................ ........................ 4,700 Colorado ................................ Defense Wide ...................... Buckley Air Force Base ............. Aeromedical Clinic Addition/Alteration .................................................................. 2,100 2,100 Florida ................................... Defense Wide ...................... Jacksonville ............................... Hospital Addition/Alteration ................................................................................... 28,438 28,438 Georgia .................................. Defense Wide ...................... Fort Benning ............................. Consolidated Health Clinic .................................................................................... 7,100 7,100 South Carolina ...................... Defense Wide ...................... Parris Island ............................. Medical/Dental Clinic Replacement ....................................................................... 25,000 25,000 Virginia .................................. Defense Wide ...................... Langley AFB .............................. Hospital Addition/Alteration ................................................................................... 50,800 50,800 

Defense Wide ...................... Fort Belvoir ................................ Hospital Replacement Phase I .............................................................................. 43,000 43,000 

Diego Garcia .......................... Defense Wide ...................... Diego Garcia ............................. Dental Clinic Replacement .................................................................................... 3,800 3,800 Germany ................................ Defense Wide ...................... Grafenwoehr .............................. Dispensary/Dental Clinic Additon/Alteration .......................................................... 13,000 13,000 

Total ......................... ............................................. ................................................... ................................................................................................................................. 183,138 187,838 

Defense Wide Total ............... ............................................. ................................................... ................................................................................................................................. 183,138 183,138 Air National Guard Total ....... ............................................. ................................................... ................................................................................................................................. ........................ 4,700 
23 

CONTINGENCY CONSTRUCTION

The Committee has provided $10,000,000 for the Secretary of Defense ‘‘Contingency construction’’ account in accordance with the 

budget request. This account provides funds which may be used by 

the Secretary of Defense for unforeseen facility requirements. The 

Committee believes that the funding provided in the account is 

adequate to meet the needs of the Department. 

ENERGY CONSERVATION INVESTMENT PROGRAM

The Committee recommends the full budget request of 

$60,000,000 for the Energy Conservation Investment Program 

[ECIP]. The Committee maintains a strong interest in renewable 

energy resources, including wind, solar, and geothermal, and commends the Services for the awards they have received for renewable energy initiatives, including the Presidential Awards for Leadership in Federal Energy Management. The Committee also commends the Navy for its geothermal energy program at China Lake, 

California. According to the General Accounting Office, the program generates a revenue stream of, on average, $14,700,000 a 

year, two-thirds of which the Navy invests in a variety of energy 

conservation and renewable energy projects. However, the other 

Services do not have any similar renewable energy revenue 

streams, and overall, renewable energy efforts to date represent a 

very small percentage of the potential for increased renewable energy use at Department of Defense [DoD] installations. 

In fiscal year 2002, the Committee provided $10,000,000 in ECIP 

funding to initiate an assessment of renewable energy opportunities on or near U.S. Defense installations (Senate Report 107–68). 

In fiscal year 2004, the Committee provided an additional 

$2,500,000 to enable the Air Force, which serves as lead agent for 

the assessment, to complete the study by November 30, 2004. 

It is the understanding of the Committee that the 2004 funding 

has not yet been released, and that the study cannot be completed 

on time if the funding is not forthcoming. The Committee is concerned that the delays have been caused by a lack of leadership 

and cooperation between OSD and the Services. The Committee believes that renewable energy holds great potential for helping DoD 

achieve energy efficiency targets and reduce energy costs. Moreover, in the face of continued instability in the Middle East and rising threats to overseas oil production, renewable energy resources 

have become an increasingly important component of energy security and reliability. 

For these reasons, the Committee directs the Department to release the funding needed to complete the renewable energy assessment as expeditiously as possible. The Committee also directs the 

Department to provide to the congressional defense committees a 

strategy and projected budget for implementing the findings and 

recommendations of the report within 90 days after the completion 

of the report. The plan should include the following elements: a detailed budget proposal and timeline encompassing short term and 

long term objectives; management and personnel requirements to 

execute the plan in each of the Services; and an explanation of any 

changes needed in procurement, legal, or regulatory requirements 
24 

to streamline the procurement of renewable energy at U.S. defense 

installations. The plan should also provide a detailed description of 

standardized processes and procedures to provide ongoing program 

support and address operational, environmental, cost, education, 

and technology issues. 

Because of the delays over the past year, the Committee extends 

the deadline for the report until December 31, 2004. Further, the 

Committee directs that, of the funds provided in this bill for ECIP 

projects, $3,000,000 be made available for solar structures, including roofing shingles and free-standing solar shade structures, to be 

added to or integrated into new or existing military construction or 

family housing projects to promote energy conservation as well as 

to provide other benefits, including improved working conditions for 

military personnel who maintain equipment outdoors. 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, RESERVE COMPONENTS

Appropriations, 2004 ............................................................................. $730,481,000 

Budget estimate, 2005 ........................................................................... 619,936,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 814,281,000 

The Committee recommends $814,281,000 for military construction projects for the Guard and Reserve components. This amount 

is $194,345,000 above the fiscal year 2005 budget request. The 

Committee applauds the Department for its significantly increased 

Reserve Component budget request but believes funding for the Reserve Component still falls woefully short of requirements, particularly in the face of the extensive demands made on the Guard and 

Reserve in the current war effort. Accordingly, the Committee recommends significant increases to Reserve Component funding. 

The Committee’s recommended action on each Reserve component project is reflected in the State list at the end of this report. 

The Committee recommends approval of military construction, 

Reserve component as outlined in the following table: 

RESERVE COMPONENT 

Component Request Recommended 

Army National Guard ............................................................................................................... $295,657,000 $381,765,000 

Air National Guard .................................................................................................................. 127,368,000 231,083,000 

Army Reserve ........................................................................................................................... 87,070,000 66,325,000 

Naval Reserve ......................................................................................................................... 25,285,000 33,735,000 

Air Force Reserve .................................................................................................................... 84,556,000 101,373,000 

Total ........................................................................................................................... 619,936,000 814,281,000 

The Committee has added funding for specific Reserve component planning and design initiatives. The Committee recommendation also provides additional funding over the budget request for 

minor construction activities for the Reserve components. 

The Committee fully expects contracts for the following projects 

to be awarded, as early in fiscal year 2005 as practical: 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, ARMY NATIONAL GUARD

Auditorium/Instructor Support Building, Camp Murray Air National Guard Station, WA.—Of the funds provided for unspecified 
25 

minor construction in this account, the Committee directs that 

$1,390,000 be made available for construction of this facility. 

Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range, Fort Chaffee, AR.—Of the 

funds provided for unspecified minor construction in this account, 

the Committee directs that $1,282,000 be made available for the 

construction of this range. 

National Guard Armory, Ontario, OR.—Of the funds provided for 

planning and design in this account, the Committee directs that 

$473,000 be made available for the design of this facility. 

National Guard Armory, Winchester, VA.—Of the funds provided 

for planning and design in this account, the Committee directs that 

$530,000 be made available for the design of this facility. 

Readiness Center and Organizational Maintenance Shop, Sacramento, CA.—Of the funds provided for planning and design in this account, the Committee directs that $2,015,000 be made available for the design of these facilities. 

Taxiway/Apron, Williamstown, WV.—Of the funds provided for 

unspecified minor construction in this account, the Committee directs that $1,500,000 be made available for construction of this facility. 

Training Area Railhead, Gowen Field, ID.—Of the funds provided for planning and design in this account, the Committee directs that $1,349,000 be made available for the design of this facility. 

Weapons of Mass Destruction/Civil Support Team Facility, Fort 

Dix, NJ.—Of the funds provided for unspecified minor construction 

in this account, the Committee directs that $1,402,000 be made 

available for construction of this facility. 

Weapons of Mass Destruction/Civil Support Team Facility, Fort 

Meade, MD.—Of the funds provided for unspecified minor construction in this account, the Committee directs that $1,414,000 be 

made available for construction of this facility. 

Weapons of Mass Destruction/Civil Support Team Facility, Jackson, MS.—Of the funds provided for unspecified minor construction in this account, the Committee directs that $1,313,000 be made 

available for construction of this facility. 

Weapons of Mass Destruction/Civil Support Team Facility, Rapid 

City, SD.—Of the funds provided for unspecified minor construction in this account, the Committee directs that $1,500,000 be made 

available for construction of this facility. 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, AIR NATIONAL GUARD

Air National Guard C–5 Conversion Program.—The Committee 

recognizes the importance of the Air National Guard C–5 conversion program as an essential element of the Air Force transformation initiative. In order to keep this program on schedule, it 

is imperative that all C–5 facility conversion requirements at Memphis, Tennessee, and Martinsburg, West Virginia, be fully funded 

by fiscal year 2007 or earlier to ensure that the facilities are ready 

for the arrival of the C–5 aircraft in 2008. The Committee therefore 

urges the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Air Force 

to maintain the current funding schedule, or accelerate the schedule where feasible, to provide full funding for the remainder of 

these facilities in the fiscal year 2006 and 2007 time frame. 
26 

C–5 Facilities, Martinsburg, WV.—Of the funds provided for 

planning and design in this account, the Committee directs that 

not less than $3,000,000 be made available for the design of these 

facilities. 

Fire/Rescue Replacement and Deployment Training Facility, Hector, ND.—Of the funds provided for planning and design in this account, the Committee directs that $702,000 be made available for 

the design of this facility. 

Munitions Maintenance and Storage Facility, Gowen Field, ID.— 

Of the funds provided for planning and design in this account, the 

Committee directs that not less than $900,000 be made available 

for the design of this facility. 

Pararescue Readiness Facility, Francis Gabreski Airport, 

Westhampton, NY.—Of the funds provided for planning and design 

in this account, the Committee directs that $990,000 be made 

available for the design of this facility. 

Security Police Annex, Great Falls International Airport, MT.— 

Of the funds provided for unspecified minor construction in this account, the Committee directs that not less than $900,000 be made 

available for construction of this facility. 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, U.S. ARMY RESERVE

Armed Forces Reserve Center, Houston, TX.—Of the funds provided for planning and design in this account, the Committee directs that $3,278,000 be made available for the design of this facility. 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, NAVAL RESERVE

Aircraft Rescue Firefighting Facility, New Orleans Naval Air Station/Joint Reserve Base, LA.—Of the funds provided for planning 

and design in this account, the Committee directs that $750,000 be 

made available for the design of this facility. 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, AIR FORCE RESERVE

Fire Crash Rescue Station, Niagara Air Reserve Station, NY.—Of 

the funds provided for planning and design in this account, the 

Committee directs that $702,000 be made available for the design 

of this station. 

NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION

SECURITY INVESTMENT PROGRAM

Appropriations, 2004 ............................................................................. $161,300,000 

Budget estimate, 2005 ........................................................................... 165,800,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 165,800,000 

The Committee has provided $165,800,000 for the North Atlantic 

Treaty Organization [NATO] Security Investment Program for fiscal year 2005, fully funding the budget request. 

The Committee continues the requirement that no funds will be 

used for projects (including planning and design) related to the enlargement of NATO and the Partnership for Peace program, unless 

Congress is notified 21 days in advance of the obligation of funds. 
27 

In addition, the Committee’s intent is that section 121 of the General Provisions shall apply to this program. 

The Department of Defense is directed to identify separately the 

level of effort anticipated for NATO enlargement and for Partnership for Peace for that fiscal year in future budget justifications. 

The Committee continues to direct that no funds appropriated in 

this or any other Act for the NATO Security Investment Program 

be obligated or expended for missile defense studies. 

FAMILY HOUSING OVERVIEW

The Committee has provided $4,163,814,000 for family housing 

construction, operations and maintenance, and the Department’s 

family housing improvement fund. This amount is $7,782,000 

below the fiscal year 2005 budget request but $343,714,000 above 

the amount appropriated in fiscal year 2004. 

FAMILY HOUSING, ARMY

Appropriations, 2004 ............................................................................. $1,333,886,000 

Budget estimate, 2005 ........................................................................... 1,565,006,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 1,565,006,000 

The Committee recommends a total of $1,565,006,000 for family 

housing, Army, in fiscal year 2005. This is equal to the fiscal year 

2005 budget request. 

CONSTRUCTION

The Committee recommends $394,900,000 for new construction, 

as shown below: 
28 

ARMY FAMILY HOUSING CONSTRUCTION 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Location Installation Project Title Request Recommended 

Alaska ...................................................................................... Fort Wainwright ......................... Family Housing New Construction (100 Units) ..................................................... 41,000 41,000 

Fort Wainwright ......................... Family Housing Replacement Construction (60 Units) ......................................... 37,000 37,000 Fort Wainwright ......................... Family Housing Replacement Construction (86 Units) ......................................... 46,000 46,000 Fort Richardson ......................... Family Housing Replacement Construction (92 Units) ......................................... 42,000 42,000 

Arizona ..................................................................................... Fort Huachuca ........................... Family Housing Replacement Construction (205 Units) ....................................... 41,000 41,000 

Yuma ......................................... Family Housing Replacement Construction (55 Units) ......................................... 14,900 14,900 

Kansas ..................................................................................... Fort Riley ................................... Family Housing Replacement Construction (126 Units) ....................................... 33,000 33,000 New Mexico .............................................................................. White Sands .............................. Family Housing Replacement Construction (156 Units) ....................................... 31,000 31,000 Oklahoma ................................................................................. Fort Sill ..................................... Family Housing Replacement Construction (247 Units) ....................................... 47,000 47,000 Virginia .................................................................................... Fort Lee ..................................... Family Housing Replacement Construction (218 Units) ....................................... 46,000 46,000 

Fort Monroe ............................... Family Housing Replacement Construction (68 Units) ......................................... 16,000 16,000 

Total ........................................................................... ................................................... ................................................................................................................................. 394,900 394,900 
29 

CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS

The following projects are to be accomplished within the amounts 

provided for construction improvements: 

ARMY CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Location Installation Project Title Request Recommended 

Alabama .......................................... Redstone Arsenal ......... Family Housing Privatization .... 590 590 

Fort Rucker ................... Family Housing Privatization .... 24,000 24,000 

Georgia ............................................ Fort Benning ................ Family Housing Privatization .... 57,000 57,000 

Fort Gordon .................. Family Housing Privatization .... 9,000 9,000 

Kansas ............................................ Fort Leavenworth .......... Family Housing Privatization .... 15,000 15,000 

Fort Riley ...................... Family Housing Improvements .. 30,000 30,000 

Kentucky .......................................... Fort Knox ...................... Family Housing Privatization .... 31,000 31,000 

New York ......................................... U.S. Military Academy .. Family Housing Improvements .. 10,600 10,600 

South Carolina ................................ Fort Jackson ................. Family Housing Improvements .. 20,000 20,000 

Germany .......................................... Grafenwoehr ................. Family Housing Improvements .. 5,300 5,300 

Stuttgart ....................... Family Housing Improvements .. 9,500 9,500 

Total .................................. ...................................... ................................................... 211,990 211,990 

FAMILY HOUSING, NAVY AND MARINE CORPS

Appropriations, 2004 ............................................................................. $985,043,000 

Budget estimate, 2005 ........................................................................... 843,611,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 843,611,000 

The Committee recommends $843,611,000 for family housing, 

Navy and Marine Corps, in fiscal year 2005. This amount is equal 

to the fiscal year 2005 budget request. 

CONSTRUCTION

The Committee recommends $27,002,000 for new construction, as 

shown below: 

NAVY AND MARINE CORPS FAMILY HOUSING CONSTRUCTION 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Location Installation Project Request Recommended 

North Carolina .......... Cherry Point MCAS .... Slocum Village Replacement Phase III (198 

Units).

27,002 27,002 

CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS

The following projects are to be accomplished within the amounts 

provided for construction improvements: 

NAVY AND MARINE CORPS CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Location Installation Project Title Request Recommended 

California ........................ Twentynine Palms MCAGCC ... Whole House Improvement .............. 25,702 25,702 

Missouri .......................... Kansas City MCSA ................. Whole House Improvement .............. 20,238 20,238 

North Carolina ................ Camp Lejeune MCB ............... Whole House Improvement .............. 56,165 56,165 

Japan .............................. Yokosuka CNF ........................ Whole House Improvement .............. 10,000 10,000 

Total .................. ................................................ .......................................................... 112,105 112,105 
30 

FAMILY HOUSING, AIR FORCE

Appropriations, 2004 ............................................................................. $1,460,773,000 

Budget estimate, 2005 ........................................................................... 1,710,855,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 1,703,073,000 

The Committee recommends $1,703,073,000 for family housing, 

Air Force, in fiscal year 2005, which is $7,782,000 below the budget 

request. 

CONSTRUCTION

The Committee recommends $570,340,000 for new construction, 

as requested, as shown below: 
31 

AIR FORCE FAMILY HOUSING CONSTRUCTION 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Location Installation Project Title Request Recommended 

Arizona ..................................................................................... Davis-Monthan AAFB ................ Replace Family Housing Phase 6 (250 Units) ...................................................... 48,500 48,500 California ................................................................................. Edwards AFB ............................. Replace Family Housing (218 Units) ..................................................................... 41,202 41,202 California ................................................................................. Vandenberg AFB ........................ Replace Family Housing Phase 8 (120 Units) ...................................................... 30,906 30,906 Florida ...................................................................................... MacDill AFB ............................... Construct Housing Maintenance Facility ............................................................... 1,250 1,250 Florida ...................................................................................... MacDill AFB ............................... Replace Family Housing Phase 6 (61 Units) ........................................................ 21,723 21,723 Idaho ........................................................................................ Mountain Home AFB ................. Replace Family Housing Phase 6 (147 Units) ...................................................... 39,333 39,333 Mississippi ............................................................................... Columbus AFB ........................... Family Housing Management Facility .................................................................... 711 711 Missouri ................................................................................... Whiteman AFB ........................... Replace Family Housing Phase 6 (160 Units) ...................................................... 37,087 37,087 Montana ................................................................................... Malmstrom AFB ......................... Replace Family Housing (115 Units) ..................................................................... 29,910 29,910 North Carolina ......................................................................... Seymour Johnson AFB ............... Replace Family Housing Phase 8 (167 Units) ...................................................... 32,693 32,693 North Dakota ........................................................................... Minot AFB .................................. Replace Family Housing Phase 11 (142 Units) .................................................... 37,087 37,087 North Dakota ........................................................................... Grand Forks AFB ....................... Replace Family Housing Phase 2 (90 Units) ........................................................ 26,169 26,169 South Carolina ......................................................................... Charleston AFB ......................... Construct Huntley Park Fire Station ...................................................................... 1,976 1,976 South Dakota ........................................................................... Ellsworth AFB ............................ Replace Family Housing Phase 4 (75 Units) ........................................................ 21,482 21,482 Texas ........................................................................................ Goodfellow AFB ......................... Construct Family Housing Phase 1 (127 Units) ................................................... 20,604 20,604 Texas ........................................................................................ Dyess AFB ................................. Replace Family Housing Phase 5 (127 Units) ...................................................... 28,664 28,664 Germany ................................................................................... Ramstein AB ............................. Replace Family Housing (144 Units) ..................................................................... 57,691 57,691 Italy .......................................................................................... Aviano AB .................................. Replace Housing Office ......................................................................................... 2,542 2,542 Korea ........................................................................................ Osan AB .................................... Construct Family Housing Phase 3 (117 Units) ................................................... 46,834 46,834 United Kingdom ....................................................................... Royal Air Force Lakenheath ...... Replace Family Housing (154 Units) ..................................................................... 43,976 43,976 

Total ........................................................................... ................................................... ................................................................................................................................. 570,340 570,340 
32 

CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS

The following projects are to be accomplished within the amounts 

provided for construction improvements: 

AIR FORCE CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Location Installation Project Title Request Recommended 

Alaska ................................................... Eielson AFB ........ Construct Utility Corridor ................ 3,762 3,762 

Colorado ................................................ AF Academy ....... Improve Infrastructure .................... 173 173 

Peterson AFB ...... Improve Parking .............................. 414 414 

District of Columbia ............................. Bolling AFB ........ Improve Electrical System ............... 310 310 

Florida ................................................... Patrick AFB ........ Construct River Walk ...................... 442 442 

Patrick AFB ........ Construct Tot Lot ............................ 100 100 

Tyndall AFB ........ Privatize Family Housing ................. .............. ....................

Georgia ................................................. Robins AFB ........ Improve Family Housing .................. 24,146 24,146

Robins AFB ........ Improve Infrastructure .................... 1,236 1,236 

Illinois ................................................... Scott AFB ........... Privatize Family Housing ................. 5,151 5,151 

Louisiana .............................................. Barksdale AFB ... Improve Family Housing, Phase I ... 9,109 9,109 

Maryland ............................................... Andrews AFB ...... Improve Family Housing .................. 36,381 36,381 

Mississippi ............................................ Columbus AFB ... Privatize Family Housing ................. .............. ....................

Keesler AFB ........ Privatize Family Housing ................. 35,854 35,854 

Montana ................................................ Malmstrom AFB Construct Access Road ................... 200 200 

New Mexico ........................................... Holloman AFB .... Privatize Family Housing ................. 24,448 24,448 

North Carolina ...................................... Pope AFB ............ Improve Housing Office ................... 360 360 

Tennessee ............................................. Arnold AFB ......... Improve Infrastructure .................... 1,222 1,222 

Texas ..................................................... Randolph AFB .... Improve Family Housing .................. 28,900 28,900

Virginia ................................................. Langley AFB ....... Improve Electrical System ............... 1,726 1,726 

Washington ........................................... Fairchild AFB ..... Privatize Family Housing ................. 17,410 17,410 

Japan .................................................... Kadena AB ......... Improve Family Housing .................. 26,722 26,722 

Kadena AB ......... Install Government Furnished 

Materials ..................................... 843 843 

Kadena AB ......... Install Government Furnished 

Materials ..................................... 730 730 

Kadena AB ......... Improve Erosion Control .................. 750 750 

Kadena AB ......... Improve Storm Drainage System .... 110 110 

Misawa AB ......... Construct Storage Sheds ................ 1,089 1,089 

Yokota AB .......... Improve Family Housing .................. 16,483 16,483 

Yokota AB .......... Improve Family Housing .................. 282 282 

Total ........................................ ............................ .......................................................... 238,353 238,353 

FAMILY HOUSING, DEFENSE-WIDE

Appropriations, 2004 ............................................................................. $49,790,000 

Budget estimate, 2005 ........................................................................... 49,624,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 49,624,000 

The Committee recommends $49,624,000 for family housing, Defense-wide, in fiscal year 2005. This amount is equal to the budget 

request. Specific details are included in the tables at the end of the 

report. 

FAMILY HOUSING IMPROVEMENT FUND

Appropriations, 2004 ............................................................................. $300,000 

Budget estimate, 2005 ........................................................................... 2,500,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 2,500,000 

The Committee recommends $2,500,000 for the Family Housing 

Improvement Fund. This amount is equal to the budget request. 
33 

CHEMICAL WEAPONS DEMILITARIZATION CONSTRUCTION

Appropriations, 2004 ............................................................................. $119,815,000 

Budget Estimate, 2005 .......................................................................... 81,886,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 81,886,000 

The Committee recommends $81,886,000 for chemical weapons 

demilitarization construction, an amount equal to the budget request. 

BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT, PART IV 

Appropriations, 2004 ............................................................................. $370,427,000 

Budget estimate, 2005 ........................................................................... 246,116,000 

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 246,116,000 

The Committee recommends a total of $246,116,000 for the base 

realignment and closure account, part IV. This is an amount equal 

to the budget request and a decrease of $124,311,000 from the fiscal year 2004 appropriation. The Committee notes, however, that 

the Department of the Navy requested no funds for BRAC cleanup, 

informing the committee that it intended to expend in fiscal year 

2005 at least $115,000,000 in anticipated proceeds from the sale of 

excess land from previous BRAC rounds. The Committee regards 

this as a commitment by the Department and fully expects it to expend these funds for BRAC cleanup in fiscal year 2005. With the 

additional monies, the funding for BRAC environmental cleanup 

and caretaker costs totals $361,116,000. The Military Departments 

have assured the Committee that this level of funding is adequate 

to address urgent BRAC requirements for fiscal year 2005. 

BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT OVERVIEW

Since the start of the current process for Base Realignment and 

Closure [BRAC], Military Construction Appropriations Acts have 

appropriated a net total of $22,957,591,000 for the entire program 

for fiscal years 1990 through 2004. The total amount appropriated 

combined with the Committee recommendation for fiscal year 2005 

BRAC $23,203,727,000. 

In appropriating these funds, the Committee continues to provide 

the Department with the flexibility to allocate funds by Service, by 

function, and by installation. The Committee recognizes the complexity of the base realignment and closure process, and particularly of the environmental clean up requirements, and believes that 

it is important to give the Department a significant degree of flexibility in order to execute the program efficiently. 

The following table displays the total amount appropriated for 

each round of base closure, including amounts recommended for fiscal year 2005. 

BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE 

[Total funding, fiscal year 1990 through fiscal year 2005] 

Fiscal year 1990 

through fiscal year 2003 

Fiscal year 2004 enacted 

Fiscal year 2005 

Committee recommended Total 

Part I ............................................................. $2,684,577,000 ( 1 ) ( 1 ) $2,684,577,000 

Part II ............................................................ 4,915,636,000 ( 1 ) ( 1 ) 4,915,636,000 

Part III ........................................................... 7,269,267,000 ( 1 ) ( 1 ) 7,269,267,000 
34 

BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE—Continued 

[Total funding, fiscal year 1990 through fiscal year 2005] 

Fiscal year 1990 

through fiscal year 

2003 

Fiscal year 2004 

enacted 

Fiscal year 2005 

Committee recommended Total 

Part IV ........................................................... 7,717,704,000 $370,427,000 $246,116,000 8,334,247,000 

Total ................................................ 22,587,184,000 370,427,000 246,116,000 23,203,727,000 

1 Not Applicable. 

FORT HUNTER LIGGETT, CALIFORNIA

The Committee is aware of interest by the U.S. Forest Service in 

incorporating Fort Hunter Liggett Army Reserve Base in California 

into the National Forest System in the event that the Defense Department determines that the base is no longer needed for military 

purposes. Currently, Fort Hunter Liggett fulfills a critical requirement as an Army Reserve training base, and the Committee is 

aware of no plans to close the base at this time. However, in view 

of the ongoing Base Realignment and Closure process, and the 

unique attributes of Fort Hunter Liggett, the Committee believes 

it is important to lay the groundwork for the possible future disposition of the installation. 

Fort Hunter Liggett occupies 165,000 acres in an extraordinary 

location, in the heart of California’s Big Sur region adjacent to the 

Los Padres National Forest. In an effort to preserve and protect 

this irreplaceable land for generations to come, the Forest Service 

is considering a proposal that would incorporate Fort Hunter 

Liggett and the Los Padres National Forest into a new Big Sur National Forest, should the base be closed. The area is one of California’s most pristine and scenic regions. The land provides habitat 

for several federally listed threatened and endangered species, and 

also contains numerous Native American archaeological and cultural sites. The area also offers outstanding recreational opportunities including hiking, mountain biking, equestrian use, camping, 

nature study, fishing and hunting. Nearly half of the land that 

comprises Fort Hunter Liggett was national forest before being 

transferred to the War Department in World War II. For these reasons, the Committee believes that if the current military use of the 

Forest should terminate in the future, first consideration for use of 

the land should be for National Forest purposes, for which it is 

uniquely suited. 

In recognition of Fort Hunter Liggett’s extraordinary attributes 

and unique location, and in view of the potential to preserve the 

land as a National Forest, the Committee recommends a provision 

to give the Secretary of Agriculture, whose agency oversees the 

Forest Service, the right of first refusal to negotiate with the Secretary of the Army to accept the administrative jurisdiction of the 

land that comprises Fort Hunter Liggett for incorporation into the 

National Forest System at such time as the base may be declared 

excess of Federal military needs. 
(35) 

GENERAL PROVISIONS 

The following lists general provisions proposed by the Committee. The Committee recommends inclusion of several proposals 

which have been incorporated in previous appropriations acts, provisions requested by the Defense Department, and new provisions. 

The Committee recommendations are as follows: 

SEC. 101. Restricts payments under a cost-plus-a-fixed-fee contract for work, except in cases of contracts for environmental restoration at base closure sites. 

SEC. 102. Permits use of funds for hire of passenger motor vehicles. 

SEC. 103. Permits use of funds for defense access roads. 

SEC. 104. Prohibits construction of new bases inside the continental United States for which specific appropriations have not 

been made. 

SEC. 105. Limits the use of funds for purchase of land or land 

easements. 

SEC. 106. Prohibits the use of funds to acquire land, prepare a 

site, or install utilities for any family housing except housing for 

which funds have been made available. 

SEC. 107. Limits the use of minor construction funds to transfer 

or relocate activities among installations. 

SEC. 108. Prohibits the procurement of steel unless American 

producers, fabricators, and manufacturers have been allowed to 

compete. 

SEC. 109. Prohibits payments of real property taxes in foreign 

nations. 

SEC. 110. Prohibits construction of new bases overseas without 

prior notification. 

SEC. 111. Establishes a threshold for American preference of 

$500,000 relating to architect and engineering services. 

SEC. 112. Establishes preference for American contractors for 

military construction in the United States territories and possessions in the Pacific, and on Kwajalein Atoll, or in the Arabian Sea. 

SEC. 113. Requires notification of military exercises involving 

construction in excess of $100,000. 

SEC. 114. Limits obligations during the last 2 months of the year. 

SEC. 115. Permits funds appropriated in prior years to be available for construction authorized during the current session of Congress. 

SEC. 116. Permits the use of expired or lapsed funds to pay the 

cost of supervision for any project being completed with lapsed 

funds. 

SEC. 117. Permits obligation of funds from more than 1 fiscal 

year to execute a construction project, provided that the total obligation for such project is consistent with the total amount appropriated for the project. 
36 

SEC. 118. Directs the Department to report annually on actions 

taken to encourage other nations to assume a greater share of the 

common defense budget. 

SEC. 119. Allows transfer of proceeds from earlier base realignment and closure accounts to the continuing base realignment and 

closure accounts. 

SEC. 120. Permits the transfer of funds from Family Housing 

Construction accounts to the DOD Family Housing Improvement 

Fund and from Military Construction accounts to the DOD Military 

Unaccompanied Housing Improvement Fund. 

SEC. 121. Restricts the use of funds for the Partnership for Peace 

Program. 

SEC. 122. Requires the Secretary of Defense to notify the congressional defense committees of all family housing privatization solicitations and agreements which contain any clause providing consideration for base realignment and closure, force reductions and extended deployments. 

SEC. 123. Provides transfer authority to the Homeowners Assistance Program. 

SEC. 124. Requires that all Military Construction Appropriations 

Acts be the sole funding source of all operation and maintenance 

for family housing, including flag and general officer quarters, and 

limits the repair on flag and general officer quarters to $35,000 per 

year without prior notification to the defense committees. 

SEC. 125. Limits funds from being transferred from this appropriation measure into any new instrumentality without authority 

from an appropriation Act. 

SEC. 126. Prohibits funds appropriated for the North Atlantic 

Treaty Organization Security Investment Program from being obligated or expended for the purpose of missile defense studies. 

SEC. 127. Modifies the due date for the final report of the Commission on the Overseas Military Facility Structure of the United 

States. 

SEC. 128. Provides authority to expend funds from the Ford Island Improvement Account. 

SEC. 129. Provides to the Secretary of Agriculture the right of 

first refusal to negotiate over disposal of any land at Fort Hunter 

Liggett, California, determined to be in excess of military needs. 

COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 7, RULE XVI, OF THE 

STANDING RULES OF THE SENATE 

Paragraph 7 of rule XVI requires that Committee reports on general appropriations bills identify each Committee amendment to 

the House bill ‘‘which proposes an item of appropriation which is 

not made to carry out the provisions of an existing law, a treaty 

stipulation, or an act or resolution previously passed by the Senate 

during that session.’’ 

The Committee bill as recommended contains no such provisions. 

COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 7(C), RULE XXVI OF THE 

STANDING RULES OF THE SENATE 

Pursuant to paragraph 7(c) of rule XXVI, on July 15, 2004, the 

Committee ordered reported en bloc S. 2666, an original bill mak-
37 

ing appropriations for the Legislative Branch for the fiscal year 

ending September 30, 2005, and S. 2674, an original bill making 

appropriations for Military Construction of the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2005, with each subject to amendment, by a recorded vote of 29–0, a quorum being 

present. The vote was as follows: 

Yeas Nays 

Chairman Stevens 

Mr. Cochran 

Mr. Specter 

Mr. Domenici 

Mr. Bond 

Mr. McConnell 

Mr. Burns 

Mr. Shelby 

Mr. Gregg 

Mr. Bennett 

Mr. Campbell 

Mr. Craig 

Mrs. Hutchison 

Mr. DeWine 

Mr. Brownback 

Mr. Byrd 

Mr. Inouye 

Mr. Hollings 

Mr. Leahy 

Mr. Harkin 

Ms. Mikulski 

Mr. Reid 

Mr. Kohl 

Mrs. Murray 

Mr. Dorgan 

Mrs. Feinstein 

Mr. Durbin 

Mr. Johnson 

Ms. Landrieu 

COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 12, RULE XXVI OF THE 

STANDING RULES OF THE SENATE 

Paragraph 12 of rule XXVI requires that Committee reports on 

a bill or joint resolution repealing or amending any statute or part 

of any statute include ‘‘(a) the text of the statute or part thereof 

which is proposed to be repealed; and (b) a comparative print of 

that part of the bill or joint resolution making the amendment and 

of the statute or part thereof proposed to be amended, showing by 

stricken-through type and italics, parallel columns, or other appropriate typographical devices the omissions and insertions which 

would be made by the bill or joint resolution if enacted in the form 

recommended by the committee.’’ 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2004, 

PUBLIC LAW 108–132 

* * * * * * * 
38 

GENERAL PROVISIONS 

SEC. 128. (a) * * * 

* * * * * * * 

(b) * * * 

(1) * * * 

* * * * * * * 

(3)(A) Not later than øDecember 31, 2004¿ August 15, 

2005, the Commission shall submit to the President and Congress a report which shall contain a detailed statement of the 

findings and conclusions of the Commission, together with its 

recommendations for such legislation and administrative actions as it considers appropriate. 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Installation and project Budget 

request 

Committee 

recommendation 

Change from 

budget 

estimate 

ALABAMA 

ARMY: 

ANNISTON ARMY DEPOT: POWERTRAIN COMPONENT REBUILDING FACILITY .................................................................................................. 23,690 23,690 ......................

FORT RUCKER: AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR ................................. ...................... 16,500 ∂16,500 

DEFENSE-WIDE: HUNTSVILLE: MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY CENTER, VON 

BRAUN COMPLEX (PHASE II) ....................................................................... 19,560 19,560 ......................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: 

CENTREVILLE: ADDITION/ALTERATION READINESS CENTER .................... 5,537 5,537 ......................

CLANTON: ADDITION/ALTERATION READINESS CENTER ........................... 3,649 3,649 ......................

ONEONTA: ADDITION/ALTERATION READINESS CENTER .......................... 4,527 4,527 ......................

TOTAL, ALABAMA ................................................................................. 56,963 73,463 ∂16,500 

ALASKA 

ARMY: 

FORT RICHARDSON: 

BARRACKS COMPLEX ..................................................................... 7,600 7,600 ......................

DIGITAL MULTIPURPOSE TRAINING RANGE ..................................... 13,600 13,600 ......................

SNIPER FIELD FIRE RANGE ............................................................ 3,100 3,100 ......................

FORT WAINWRIGHT: 

BARRACKS COMPLEX—LORRAINE ROAD ....................................... 39,815 39,815 ......................

BARRACKS COMPLEX RENEWAL—SANTIAGO ROAD ....................... 30,912 30,912 ......................

COMBINED ARMS COLLECTIVE TRAINING FACILITY ........................ 21,732 21,732 ......................

AIR FORCE: 

ELMENDORF AIR FORCE BASE: 

C–17 SUPPORT UTILITIES .............................................................. 6,400 6,400 ......................

C–17 FLIGHT SIMULATOR FACILITY ................................................ 7,700 7,700 ......................

FITNESS CENTER ............................................................................ 11,957 11,957 ......................

LARGE AIRFRAME MAINTENANCE HANGAR ..................................... ...................... 28,000 ∂28,000 

DEFENSE-WIDE: FORT WAINWRIGHT: HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT (PHASE VI) .... 9,900 9,900 ......................

TOTAL, ALASKA .................................................................................... 152,716 180,716 ∂28,000 

ARIZONA 

ARMY: FORT HUACHUCA: ARMY GLOBAL INFORMATION FACILITY ................... ...................... 18,000 ∂18,000 

NAVY: 

YUMA: 

BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS ................................................... 18,740 18,740 ......................

STATION ORDNANCE AREA ............................................................. 7,930 7,930 ......................

AIR FORCE: 

DAVIS-MONTHAN AIR FORCE BASE: 

AIRFIELD OBSTRUCTION—HAZARDOUS CARGO PAD ..................... 4,243 4,243 ......................
39 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Installation and project Budget 

request 

Committee 

recommendation 

Change from 

budget 

estimate 

COMBAT SEARCH AND RESCUE C–130 SQUADRON OPERATIONS ......................................................................................... 5,786 5,786 ......................

LUKE AIR FORCE BASE: DORMITORY (120 ROOM) ................................. 10,000 10,000 ......................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: CAMP NAVAJO: QUALIFICATION TRAINING RANGE ... 3,000 3,000 ......................

TOTAL, ARIZONA .................................................................................. 49,699 67,699 ∂18,000 

ARKANSAS 

AIR FORCE: LITTLE ROCK AIR FORCE BASE: C–130J ADDITION/ALTERATION 

SIMULATOR FACILITY ................................................................................... 5,031 5,031 ......................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: 

CAMP ROBINSON: ARMY AVIATION SUPPORT FACILITY ........................... 33,020 33,020 ......................

FORT CHAFFEE: AMMUNITION SUPPLY POINT ......................................... 13,798 13,798 ......................

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: FORT SMITH: VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & AREOSPACE 

COMPLEX ..................................................................................................... ...................... 6,000 ∂6,000 

TOTAL, ARKANSAS ............................................................................... 51,849 57,849 ∂6,000 

CALIFORNIA 

ARMY: 

FORT IRWIN: 

CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION COMMAND FIELD OPERATIONS BUILDING ............................................................................................. 2,600 2,600 ......................

COMMAND AND CONTROL FACILITY ............................................... 21,000 21,000 ......................

LAND ACQUISITION (PHASE II) ....................................................... 14,500 14,500 ......................

SIERRA ARMY DEPOT: RUNWAY EXTENSION ........................................... ...................... 13,600 ∂13,600 

NAVY: 

CAMP PENDLETON: 

BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS ................................................... 19,975 19,975 ......................

CLOSE COMBAT PISTOL COURSE ................................................... 6,940 6,940 ......................

CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS CENTER ............................................ 4,910 4,910 ......................

TERTIARY SEWAGE TREATMENT (PHASE II) .................................... 25,690 25,690 ......................

WEIGHT HANDLING SHOP ............................................................... 6,630 6,630 ......................

EL CENTRO: APRON AND HANGAR RECAPITALIZATION (PHASE I) ........... 33,331 33,331 ......................

MARINE CORPS RECRUIT DEPOT: INITIAL ISSUE SUPPLY WAREHOUSE .. ...................... 8,110 ∂8,110 

AIR FORCE: 

BEALE AIR FORCE BASE: 

GLOBAL HAWK ADDITION TO AEROSPACE GROUND EQUIPMENT 

FACILITY ..................................................................................... 1,866 1,866 ......................

GLOBAL HAWK UPGRADE DOCK 2 .................................................. 8,320 8,320 ......................

EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE: ADDITION/RENOVATE JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER COMPLEX (PHASE II) ..................................................................... 9,965 9,965 ......................

TRAVIS AIR FORCE BASE: 

C–17 ADDITION ENGINE STORAGE FACILITY .................................. 2,400 2,400 ......................

C–17 UTILITIES/ROAD .................................................................... 12,844 12,844 ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE: 

CORONA: SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES MILITARY OPERATIONS IN 

URBAN TERRAIN TRAINING COMPLEX ................................................. 13,600 13,600 ......................

NORTH ISLAND: SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES GROUND MOBILITY 

SUPPORT BUILDING ............................................................................ 1,000 1,000 ......................

TRAVIS AIR FORCE BASE: REPLACE HYDRANT FUEL SYSTEM ................ 15,100 15,100 ......................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: CAMP PARKS: READINESS CENTER (ARMY NATIONAL GUARD DIVISION REDESIGN STUDY) ............................................... 11,318 11,318 ......................

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: FRESNO-YOSEMITE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT: MEDICAL TRAINING & SECURITY FORCES COMPLEX .......................................... ...................... 4,700 ∂4,700 

AIR FORCE RESERVE: 

MARCH AIR FORCE BASE: 

C–17 ALTER HANGAR TOWER ........................................................ 2,089 2,089 ......................

C–17 MAINTENANCE HANGAR (PHASE II) ...................................... 7,400 7,400 ......................

TOTAL, CALIFORNIA .................................................................... 221,478 247,888 ∂26,410 
40 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Installation and project Budget 

request 

Committee 

recommendation 

Change from 

budget 

estimate 

COLORADO 

ARMY: 

FORT CARSON: 

ARRIVAL/DEPARTURE AIR CONTROL GROUP .................................. ...................... 12,400 ∂12,400 

BARRACKS COMPLEX—HOSPITAL AREA ........................................ 14,108 14,108 ......................

DIGITAL MULTIPURPOSE TRAINING RANGE ..................................... 33,000 33,000 ......................

MULTI-PURPOSE MACHINE GUN RANGE ......................................... ...................... 3,650 ∂3,650 

AIR FORCE: 

BUCKLEY AIR FORCE BASE: 

CHAPEL CENTER ............................................................................. 6,147 6,147 ......................

CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER ....................................................... 6,100 6,100 ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE: 

BUCKLEY AIR FORCE BASE: ADDITION/ALTERATION AEROMEDICAL 

CLINIC ................................................................................................. 2,100 2,100 ......................

PUEBLO DEPOT ACTIVITY: AMMUNITION DEMILITARIZATION FACILITY 

(PHASE VI) .......................................................................................... 44,792 44,792 ......................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: 

BUCKLEY AIR FORCE BASE: ARMY AVIATION SUPPORT FACILITY ........... 34,000 34,000 ......................

FORT CARSON: AUTOMATED QUALIFICATION/TRAINING RANGE ............... 3,205 3,205 ......................

ARMY RESERVE: AURORA: ADDITION/ALTERATION MILITARY EQUIPMENT 

PARKING ....................................................................................................... 1,758 1,758 ......................

TOTAL, COLORADO .............................................................................. 145,210 161,260 ∂16,050 

CONNECTICUT 

NAVY: 

NEW LONDON: 

MK–10 SUBMARINE ESCAPE TRAINER ........................................... 17,100 17,100 ......................

REPLACE PIER 6 ............................................................................ 28,782 28,782 ......................

SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS ............................................................. ...................... 4,420 ∂4,420 

TOTAL, CONNECTICUT ................................................................ 45,882 50,302 ∂4,420 

DELAWARE 

AIR FORCE: DOVER AIR FORCE BASE: CONTROL TOWER ................................ ...................... 9,500 ∂9,500 

TOTAL, DELAWARE .............................................................................. ...................... 9,500 ∂9,500 

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

NAVY: ANACOSTIA: ATOMIC CLOCK VAULT ....................................................... 3,239 3,239 ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE: BOLLING AIR FORCE BASE: HEATING, VENTILATION, AND AIR 

CONDITIONING UPGRADE TO DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE ANALYSIS CENTER .. 6,000 6,000 ......................

TOTAL, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA .......................................................... 9,239 9,239 ......................

FLORIDA 

NAVY: 

EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE: EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE ROAD CONSTRUCTION .................................................................................................... 2,060 2,060 ......................

MAYPORT: AIRFIELD CONTROL TOWER .................................................... 6,200 6,200 ......................

AIR FORCE: 

PATRICK AIR FORCE BASE: SECURITY FORCES OPERATIONS FACILITY .. ...................... 8,800 ∂8,800 

TYNDALL AIR FORCE BASE: 

F–22 OPERATIONS FACILITY ADDITION .......................................... 1,548 ...................... ¥1,548 

F–22 SQUADRON OPERATIONS/AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE UNIT/ 

HANGAR ..................................................................................... 17,414 ...................... ¥17,414 

DEFENSE-WIDE: JACKSONVILLE: HOSPITAL ADDITION/ALTERATION .................. 28,438 28,438 ......................

NAVY RESERVE: JACKSONVILLE: RESERVE TRAINING CENTER ........................ 9,300 9,300 ......................

TOTAL, FLORIDA .................................................................................. 64,960 54,798 ¥10,162 
41 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Installation and project Budget 

request 

Committee 

recommendation 

Change from 

budget 

estimate 

GEORGIA 

ARMY: 

FORT BENNING: 

BARRACKS COMPLEX—KELLEY HILL/MAIN POST .......................... 49,565 49,565 ......................

HAZARDOUS CARGO LOADING APRON ............................................ 3,850 3,850 ......................

PHYSICAL FITNESS TRAINING CENTER ........................................... 18,362 18,362 ......................

FORT GILLEM: RECRUITING BRIGADE OPERATIONS BUILDING ................ 5,800 5,800 ......................

FORT MC PHERSON: CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER ............................... 4,900 4,900 ......................

FORT STEWART: 

AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR (SPECIAL OPERATIONS 

FORCES) ..................................................................................... 21,100 21,100 ......................

BARRACKS COMPLEX—5TH & 16TH ST (PHASE II) ...................... 32,950 32,950 ......................

CHAPEL ........................................................................................... 9,500 9,500 ......................

COMMAND AND CONTROL FACILITY ............................................... 24,695 24,695 ......................

TACTICAL EQUIPMENT COMPLEX .................................................... 10,200 10,200 ......................

NAVY: KINGS BAY: ENCLAVE FENCING AND PARKING ...................................... 16,000 16,000 ......................

AIR FORCE: 

MOODY AIR FORCE BASE: BASE SUPPORT CENTER ............................... ...................... 9,600 ∂9,600 

ROBINS AIR FORCE BASE: AIRCRAFT RAMP ........................................... 15,000 15,000 ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE: 

FORT BENNING: CONSOLIDATED HEALTH CLINIC .................................... 7,100 7,100 ......................

FORT STEWART: SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES BATTALION OPERATIONS COMPLEX ................................................................................ 17,600 17,600 ......................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: SAVANNAH: ARMY AVIATION SUPPORT FACILITY ..... 16,554 16,554 ......................

TOTAL, GEORGIA ................................................................................. 253,176 262,776 ∂9,600 

HAWAII 

ARMY: 

HELEMANO: 

DRUM ROAD UPGRADE (PHASE I) .................................................. 27,000 27,000 ......................

TANK TRAILS—HELEMANO ............................................................. 7,300 7,300 ......................

HICKAM AIR FORCE BASE: HOT CARGO PAD EXPANSION ....................... 11,200 11,200 ......................

POHAKULOA TRAINING AREA (PTA): 

SADDLE ROAD (PHASE IIB) ............................................................ ...................... 10,000 ∂10,000 

WEST PTA MODIFICATIONS ............................................................. 30,000 30,000 ......................

SCHOFIELD BARRACKS: 

BARRACKS COMPLEX RENEWAL—CAPRON AVE (PHASE III) ......... 48,000 48,000 ......................

BARRACKS COMPLEX—QUAD E (PHASE II) ................................... 36,000 36,000 ......................

BATTLE AREA LIVE FIRE COMPLEX ................................................ 32,000 32,000 ......................

COMBINED ARMS COLLECTIVE TRAINING FACILITY ........................ 32,542 32,542 ......................

FIRE STATION ................................................................................. 4,800 4,800 ......................

QUALIFICATION TRAINING RANGE ................................................... 4,950 4,950 ......................

TACTICAL VEHICLE WASH FACILITY ................................................ 3,500 3,500 ......................

VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FACILITY (PHASE I) .................................. 49,000 49,000 ......................

WHEELER AIR FORCE BASE: DEPLOYMENT FACILITY .............................. 24,000 24,000 ......................

AIR FORCE: 

HICKAM AIR FORCE BASE: 

C–17 ALTER MAINTENANCE/SUPPLY AREAS .................................. 9,000 9,000 ......................

C–17 CLEAR WATER RINSE ........................................................... 4,300 4,300 ......................

C–17 MAINTENANCE SHOP FACILITY ............................................. 8,200 8,200 ......................

C–17 MUNITIONS STORAGE ........................................................... 1,950 1,950 ......................

C–17 SUPPORT UTILITIES (PHASE II) ............................................. 2,450 2,450 ......................

ELECTRICAL UPGRADE ................................................................... ...................... 8,500 ∂8,500 

MAUI: AEOS PRIMARY MIRROR COATING FACILITY ................................. ...................... 7,500 ∂7,500 

DEFENSE-WIDE: PEARL HARBOR: MULTI-PRODUCT INTERFACE TANK ............. 3,500 3,500 ......................

TOTAL, HAWAII .................................................................................... 339,692 365,692 ∂26,000 
42 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Installation and project Budget 

request 

Committee 

recommendation 

Change from 

budget 

estimate 

IDAHO 

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: GOWEN FIELD: ADD/ALTER BASE SUPPLY COMPLEX .. ...................... 3,500 ∂3,500 

TOTAL, IDAHO ...................................................................................... ...................... 3,500 ∂3,500 

ILLINOIS 

NAVY: 

GREAT LAKES: 

BATTLE STATION TRAINING FACILITY (PHASE II) ............................ 58,200 58,200 ......................

RECRUIT BARRACKS—P738 .......................................................... 35,920 35,920 ......................

RECRUIT BARRACKS—P739 .......................................................... 38,851 38,851 ......................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: 

GALESBURG: READINESS CENTER (PHASE II) ......................................... ...................... 4,400 ∂4,400 

SPRINGFIELD: ARMY SCHOOL SYSTEM (MULTIFUNCTIONAL FACILITY) .... 13,596 13,596 ......................

TOTAL, ILLINOIS .................................................................................. 146,567 150,967 ∂4,400 

INDIANA 

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: 

GARY-CHICAGO REGIONAL AIRPORT: ARMED FORCES RESERVE CENTER ..................................................................................................... ...................... 9,380 ∂9,380 

REMINGTON: ADDITION/ALTERATION READINESS CENTER ...................... 1,458 1,458 ......................

TOTAL, INDIANA ................................................................................... 1,458 10,838 ∂9,380 

IOWA 

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: CAMP DODGE: COMPANY GRADE BOQ .................... ...................... 3,485 ∂3,485 

TOTAL, IOWA ....................................................................................... ...................... 3,485 ∂3,485 

KANSAS 

ARMY: 

FORT LEAVENWORTH: LEWIS & CLARK INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITY 

(PHASE II) ........................................................................................... 44,000 44,000 ......................

FORT RILEY: 

BARRACKS COMPLEX RENEWAL ..................................................... 41,000 41,000 ......................

COMMUNICATIONS CENTER ............................................................ 3,050 3,050 ......................

MAINTENANCE FACILITY REVITALIZATION ....................................... ...................... 15,500 ∂15,500 

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: TOPEKA: ADDITION/ALTERATION READINESS CENTER .............................................................................................................. 3,086 3,086 ......................

ARMY RESERVE: HAYS: ARMY RESERVE CENTER/ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE SHOP ................................................................................................ 7,451 7,451 ......................

TOTAL, KANSAS ................................................................................... 98,587 114,087 ∂15,500 

KENTUCKY 

ARMY: 

FORT CAMPBELL: 

AIRFIELD VEHICLE SUPPORT FACILITY ........................................... ...................... 2,400 ∂2,400 

BARRACKS COMPLEX—42ND ST/INDIANA AVE (PHASE I) ............. 30,000 30,000 ......................

COMMAND AND CONTROL FACILITY ............................................... 33,000 33,000 ......................

SHOOT HOUSE ................................................................................ 1,600 1,600 ......................

FORT KNOX: 

BASIC COMBAT TRAINING COMPLEX 1 (PHASE I) .......................... 50,000 50,000 ......................

SHOOT HOUSE ................................................................................ ...................... 1,850 ∂1,850 

URBAN ASSAULT COURSE .............................................................. ...................... 1,900 ∂1,900 

DEFENSE-WIDE: 

BLUE GRASS ARMY DEPOT: AMMUNITION DEMILITARIZATION FACILITY 

(PHASE V) ........................................................................................... 37,094 37,094 ......................

FORT CAMPBELL: AQUATIC TRAINING FACILITY ...................................... ...................... 3,600 ∂3,600 
43 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Installation and project Budget 

request 

Committee 

recommendation 

Change from 

budget 

estimate 

TOTAL, KENTUCKY ............................................................................... 151,694 161,444 ∂9,750 

LOUISIANA 

ARMY: 

FORT POLK: 

AMMUNITION SUPPLY POINT UPGRADE .......................................... 7,500 7,500 ......................

FIXED WING AIRCRAFT PARKING APRON ........................................ 25,000 25,000 ......................

HAZARDOUS CARGO LOADING APRON ............................................ 14,503 14,503 ......................

PALLET PROCESSING FACILITY ....................................................... 8,800 8,800 ......................

PASSENGER PROCESSING FACILITY ............................................... 11,700 11,700 ......................

URBAN ASSAULT COURSE .............................................................. 3,450 3,450 ......................

AIR FORCE: BARKSDALE AIR FORCE BASE: DORMITORY (168 R00M) ............ 13,800 13,800 ......................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: CAMP BEAUREGARD: ARMY AVIATION SUPPORT FACILITY ........................................................................................................... 15,738 15,738 ......................

AIR FORCE RESERVE: BARKSDALE AIR FORCE BASE: SQUADRON OPERATIONS FACILITY .......................................................................................... ...................... 5,300 ∂5,300 

TOTAL, LOUISIANA ............................................................................... 100,491 105,791 ∂5,300 

MAINE 

NAVY: 

NAVAL AIR STATION BRUNSWICK: WEAPONS MAGAZINE REPLACEMENT ................................................................................................... ...................... 4,690 ∂4,690 

PORTSMOUTH NAVAL SHIPYARD: ACOUSTIC TEST AND CALIBRATION 

FACILITY .............................................................................................. ...................... 7,860 ∂7,860 

TOTAL, MAINE ................................................................................. ...................... 12,550 ∂12,550 

MARYLAND 

ARMY: ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND: CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL SAMPLE 

RECEPTION FACILITY .................................................................................... ...................... 13,000 ∂13,000 

NAVY: INDIAN HEAD: AGILE CHEMICAL FACILITY ............................................. 13,900 13,900 ......................

AIR FORCE: 

ANDREWS AIR FORCE BASE: 

ASA—ALTER AIRCRAFT SUPPORT FACILITIES ................................ 5,000 5,000 ......................

ASA—FIGHTER AIRCRAFT ALERT COMPLEX ................................... 11,000 11,000 ......................

ASA—MUNITIONS STORAGE IGLOO ................................................ 1,100 1,100 ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE: 

FORT MEADE: 

CRITICAL COMMUNICATIONS PATH ................................................. 3,450 3,450 ......................

NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY DEEP WELLS ................................... 8,140 8,140 ......................

RECONFIGURED CHILLED WATER (PHASE II) ................................. 3,417 3,417 ......................

ARMY RESERVE: FORT MEADE: ARMY RESERVE CENTER/ORGANIZATIONAL 

MAINTENANCE SHOP/WAREHOUSE (PHASE II) ............................................. 14,642 14,642 ......................

TOTAL, MARYLAND .............................................................................. 60,649 73,649 ∂13,000 

MASSACHUSETTS 

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: OTIS AIR NATIONAL GUARD BASE: ELIMINATE AIRFIELD OBSTRUCTIONS .................................................................................. 4,000 4,000 ......................

AIR FORCE RESERVE: WESTOVER AIR RESERVE BASE: OPERATIONS FACILITY ................................................................................................................ ...................... 4,400 ∂4,400 

TOTAL, MASSACHUSETTS .................................................................... 4,000 8,400 ∂4,400 

MICHIGAN 

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: GRAND LEDGE: ARMY AVIATION SUPPORT FACILITY ................................................................................................................ 27,600 27,600 ......................

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: 

ALPENA: SQUADRON OPERATIONS FACILITY ............................................ ...................... 8,500 ∂8,500 

KELLOGG: FIRE CRASH RESCUE STATION ............................................... ...................... 5,100 ∂5,100 
44 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Installation and project Budget 

request 

Committee 

recommendation 

Change from 

budget 

estimate 

SELFRIDGE AIR NATIONAL GUARD BASE: JOINT SECURITY FORCES OPERATIONS CENTER .............................................................................. ...................... 9,700 ∂9,700 

TOTAL, MICHIGAN ........................................................................... 27,600 50,900 ∂23,300 

MINNESOTA 

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: 

DULUTH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT: 

ASA—CREW QUARTERS ................................................................. 3,000 3,000 ......................

ASA—ARM, DEARM APRON AND TAXIWAY .................................... 4,000 4,000 ......................

ASA—RELOCATE BASE ENTRANCE ROAD ...................................... 3,500 3,500 ......................

AIR FORCE RESERVE: MINNEAPOLIS-ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AIR 

RESERVE STATION: OPERATIONS FACILITY .................................................. ...................... 4,950 ∂4,950 

TOTAL, MINNESOTA ............................................................................. 10,500 15,450 ∂4,950 

MISSISSIPPI 

NAVY: GULFPORT: VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FACILITY ....................................... ...................... 4,350 ∂4,350 

AIR FORCE: COLUMBUS AIR FORCE BASE: FIRE CRASH RESCUE STATION .... ...................... 7,700 ∂7,700 

DEFENSE-WIDE: STENNIS SPACE CENTER: SOF RIVERINE AND COMBATANT 

CRAFT OPERATIONS FACILITY ...................................................................... ...................... 6,000 ∂6,000 

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: GULFPORT: ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE 

SHOP ............................................................................................................ ...................... 4,650 ∂4,650 

TOTAL, MISSISSIPPI ............................................................................. ...................... 22,700 ∂22,700 

MISSOURI 

ARMY: 

FORT LEONARD WOOD: 

COUNTERMINE TRAINING COMPLEX ............................................... ...................... 10,400 ∂10,400 

RANGE COMPLEX UPGRADE ........................................................... 2,750 2,750 ......................

WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION RESPONDER TRAINING FACILITY .............................................................................................. 15,000 15,000 ......................

TOTAL, MISSOURI .................................................................. 17,750 28,150 ∂10,400 

MONTANA 

AIR FORCE: MALMSTROM AIR FORCE BASE: CORROSION CONTROL FACILITY ................................................................................................................ ...................... 5,600 ∂5,600 

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: 

DILLON: READINESS CENTER .................................................................. ...................... 4,786 ∂4,786 

HAVRE AIR FORCE STATION: READINESS CENTER, ADDITION/ALTERATION (ARMY NATIONAL GUARD DIVISION REDESIGN STUDY) ........... 2,398 2,398 ......................

HELENA: ARMY AVIATION SUPPORT FACILITY ......................................... 7,600 7,600 ......................

TOTAL, MONTANA ................................................................................ 9,998 20,384 ∂10,386 

NEBRASKA 

AIR FORCE: OFFUTT AIR FORCE BASE: CONTROL TOWER ............................... ...................... 6,721 ∂6,721 

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: HASTINGS: MODIFIED RECORD FIRE RANGE (REMOTE TARGET SYSTEMS) ............................................................................. 1,487 1,487 ......................

TOTAL, NEBRASKA ............................................................................... 1,487 8,208 ∂6,721 

NEVADA 

NAVY: NAVAL AIR STATION FALLON: HIGH EXPLOSIVE MAGAZINES ................. ...................... 4,980 ∂4,980 

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: HENDERSON: READINESS CENTER .......................... ...................... 12,853 ∂12,853 

TOTAL, NEVADA ................................................................................... ...................... 17,833 ∂17,833 
45 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Installation and project Budget 

request 

Committee 

recommendation 

Change from 

budget 

estimate 

NEW HAMPSHIRE 

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: PEASE AIR NATIONAL GUARD BASE: AIRCRAFT PARKING RAMP REPAIR ....................................................................................... ...................... 4,900 ∂4,900 

TOTAL, NEW HAMPSHIRE .................................................................... ...................... 4,900 ∂4,900 

NEW JERSEY 

NAVY: EARLE: GENERAL PURPOSE BERTHING PIER (PHASE II) ....................... 49,200 49,200 ......................

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: ATLANTIC CITY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT: ASA—REPLACE ALERT COMPLEX ............................................................................... 10,400 10,400 ......................

TOTAL, NEW JERSEY ........................................................................... 59,600 59,600 ......................

NEW MEXICO 

ARMY: WHITE SANDS: ELECTROMAGNETIC VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT FACILITY ........................................................................................................... 33,000 33,000 ......................

AIR FORCE: CANNON AIR FORCE BASE: DINING HALL/AIRMEN’S CENTER ...... ...................... 9,500 ∂9,500 

TOTAL, NEW MEXICO ........................................................................... 33,000 42,500 ∂9,500 

NEW YORK 

ARMY: 

BUFFALO: MILITARY ENTRANCE PROCESSING STATION .......................... 6,200 6,200 ......................

FORT DRUM: 

AIRFIELD ARRIVAL/DEPARTURE FACILITY ....................................... 4,950 4,950 ......................

BARRACKS COMPLEX—WHEELER SACK ARMY AIRFIELD (PHASE 

II) ............................................................................................... 48,000 48,000 ......................

DEFENSE LIVE FIRE RANGE ............................................................ ...................... 3,000 ∂3,000 

FORT HAMILTON: MILITARY POLICE STATION .......................................... 7,600 7,600 ......................

U.S. MILITARY ACADEMY: LIBRARY AND LEARNING CENTER (PHASE 

I) ......................................................................................................... 34,500 34,500 ......................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: 

AUBURN: 

ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE SHOP (ARMY NATIONAL GUARD 

DIVISION REDESIGN STUDY (ADRS)) .......................................... 2,472 2,472 ......................

ADDITION/ALTERATION READINESS CENTER (ADRS) ...................... 4,406 4,406 ......................

FORT DRUM: READINESS CENTER (ADRS) .............................................. 6,489 6,489 ......................

KINGSTON: ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE SHOP (ADRS) .................... 3,827 3,827 ......................

UTICA: READINESS CENTER ADDITION (ADRS) ........................................ 5,704 5,704 ......................

TOTAL, NEW YORK .............................................................................. 124,148 127,148 ∂3,000 

NORTH CAROLINA 

ARMY: 

FORT BRAGG: 

AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL TOWER ....................................................... 2,500 2,500 ......................

BARRACKS COMPLEX RENEWAL BLACKJACK ST (PHASE I) ............ 49,000 49,000 ......................

BARRACKS COMPLEX—BASTOGNE DR (PHASE II) ........................ 48,000 48,000 ......................

BARRACKS COMPLEX—DONOVAN STREET (PHASE V) ................... 15,500 15,500 ......................

SOF SHOOT HOUSE ......................................................................... 2,037 2,037 ......................

SHOOT HOUSE ................................................................................ 1,650 1,650 ......................

NAVY: 

CAMP LEJEUNE: 

ARMORY, CAMP GEIGER ................................................................. 4,010 4,010 ......................

COMBAT TRAINING POOL ................................................................ 2,410 2,410 ......................

NEW RIVER: 

ADD TO SIMULATOR BUILDING ....................................................... 2,270 2,270 ......................

AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE TRAINING FACILITY ................................ 12,090 12,090 ......................

BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS ................................................... 20,780 20,780 ......................

NAVAL OUTLYING LANDING FIELD WASHINGTON COUNTY: 

OUTLYING LANDING FIELD FACILITIES (PHASE II) .......................... 33,900 33,900 ......................
46 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Installation and project Budget 

request 

Committee 

recommendation 

Change from 

budget 

estimate 

OUTLYING LANDING FIELD LAND ACQUISITION (PHASE I) .............. 61,750 61,750 ......................

AIR FORCE: 

POPE AIR FORCE BASE: 

COMBAT CONTROLLER SCHOOL EXPANSION .................................. 12,950 12,950 ......................

INDOOR FIRING RANGE FOR COMBAT CONTROL SCHOOL ............. 2,200 2,200 ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE: 

CHERRY POINT MARINE CORPS AIR STATION: REPLACE HYDRANT FUEL 

SYSTEM ............................................................................................... 22,700 22,700 ......................

FORT BRAGG: 

KENNEDY HALL RENOVATION ......................................................... 11,988 11,988 ......................

SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES COMPANY OPERATIONS BUILDING—96 CAB ............................................................................ 4,600 4,600 ......................

SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES COMPANY OPERATIONS COMPLEX ........................................................................................... 12,000 12,000 ......................

SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES COMPANY OPERATIONS FACILITY—4 POG ............................................................................... 4,500 4,500 ......................

SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES ISOLATION UNIT TRAINING FACILITY .............................................................................................. 8,300 8,300 ......................

SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES RESISTANCE TRAINING FACILITY .. 1,500 1,500 ......................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: 

BURLINGTON: ADDITION/ALTERATION READINESS CENTER ..................... 1,360 1,360 ......................

FORT BRAGG: REGIONAL TRAINING INSTITUTE (PHASE III) ..................... 6,319 6,319 ......................

LENOIR: ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE SHOP ..................................... ...................... 3,015 ∂3,015 

WINDSOR: ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE SHOP (ARMY NATIONAL 

GUARD DIVISION REDESIGN STUDY) ................................................... 2,409 2,409 ......................

NAVY RESERVE: 

ASHEVILLE: RESERVE CENTER ................................................................ 3,492 3,492 ......................

WILMINGTON: RESERVE TRAINING CENTER ............................................. ...................... 7,000 ∂7,000 

AIR FORCE RESERVE: SEYMOUR JOHNSON AIR FORCE BASE: RESERVE SECURITY FORCES OPERATIONS ...................................................................... 2,300 2,300 ......................

TOTAL, NORTH CAROLINA ................................................................... 352,515 362,530 ∂10,015 

NORTH DAKOTA 

AIR FORCE: MINOT AIR FORCE BASE: ADD/ALTER DOCK 1 TO MULTI-PURPOSE HANGAR .............................................................................................. ...................... 9,900 ∂9,900 

TOTAL, NORTH DAKOTA ....................................................................... ...................... 9,900 ∂9,900 

OHIO 

AIR FORCE: WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE: REPLACE STEAM LINES/ 

TUNNELS, AREA B (PHASE I) ....................................................................... ...................... 9,200 ∂9,200 

DEFENSE-WIDE: COLUMBUS: REPLACE PHYSICAL FITNESS FACILITY .............. 5,500 ...................... ¥5,500 

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: COLUMBUS: ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE SHOP 

(ARMY NATIONAL GUARD DIVISION REDESIGN STUDY) ............................... 2,225 2,225 ......................

AIR FORCE RESERVE: 

WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE: 

C–5 AIRFIELD PAVEMENTS (PHASE I) ............................................ 4,300 4,300 ......................

C–5 MULTI-PURPOSE HANGAR ....................................................... 16,821 16,821 ......................

TOTAL, OHIO ............................................................................... 28,846 32,546 ∂3,700 

OKLAHOMA 

ARMY: 

FORT SILL: 

CONSOLIDATED MAINTENANCE COMPLEX (PHASE III) .................... 13,100 13,100 ......................

VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FACILITY ................................................... 14,400 14,400 ......................

AIR FORCE: 

ALTUS AIR FORCE BASE: BASE CIVIL ENGINEERING COMPLEX (PHASE 

II) ........................................................................................................ ...................... 10,500 ∂10,500 
47 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Installation and project Budget 

request 

Committee 

recommendation 

Change from 

budget 

estimate 

TINKER AIR FORCE BASE: ADDITION TO INTEGRATED SUPPORT FACILITY ....................................................................................................... ...................... 8,000 ∂8,000 

DEFENSE-WIDE: TINKER AIR FORCE BASE: ADDITION/ALTERATION HYDRANT 

FUEL SYSTEM ............................................................................................... 5,400 5,400 ......................

TOTAL, OKLAHOMA .............................................................................. 32,900 51,400 ∂18,500 

OREGON 

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: EUGENE: ARMED FORCES RESERVE CENTER 

(PHASE II) .................................................................................................... 12,635 12,635 ......................

AIR FORCE RESERVE: 

PORTLAND: 

ADDITION/ALTERATION BUILDING 315 FOR PJ SQUADRON OPERATIONS ....................................................................................... 1,640 1,640 ......................

CONSOLIDATED TRAINING BUILDING (PHASE II) ............................ 3,800 3,800 ......................

MAINTENANCE HANGAR AND PAVEMENTS ...................................... 12,400 12,400 ......................

TOTAL, OREGON ......................................................................... 30,475 30,475 ......................

PENNSYLVANIA 

ARMY: LETTERKENNY ARMY DEPOT: IGLOO UPGRADE ..................................... ...................... 11,400 ∂11,400 

DEFENSE-WIDE: DEFENSE DISTRIBUTION DEPOT NEW CUMBERLAND CONSOLIDATED MAINTENANCE FACILITY ............................................................ 22,300 22,300 ......................

ARMY RESERVE: FORT INDIANTOWN GAP: ARMY RESERVE CENTER/ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE SHOP ................................................................... 13,156 13,156 ......................

NAVY RESERVE: WILLOW GROVE: FITNESS CENTER ........................................ 7,700 7,700 ......................

TOTAL, PENNSYLVANIA ........................................................................ 43,156 54,556 ∂11,400 

RHODE ISLAND 

NAVY: 

NAVAL STATION NEWPORT: 

BULK FUEL STORAGE TANK ............................................................ ...................... 5,490 ∂5,490 

NAVAL JUSTICE SCHOOL ALTERATION ............................................ ...................... 3,590 ∂3,590 

TOTAL, RHODE ISLAND ............................................................... ...................... 9,080 ∂9,080 

SOUTH CAROLINA 

NAVY: NAVAL WEAPONS STATION CHARLESTON: ELECTRONIC INTEGRATION 

AND SUPPORT FACILITY ............................................................................... ...................... 18,140 ∂18,140 

AIR FORCE: SHAW AIR FORCE BASE: SEWER OUTFALL LINE TO WATEREE 

RIVER ........................................................................................................... 3,300 3,300 ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE: PARRIS ISLAND: MEDICAL/DENTAL CLINIC REPLACEMENT .... 25,000 25,000 ......................

TOTAL, SOUTH CAROLINA .................................................................... 28,300 46,440 ∂18,140 

SOUTH DAKOTA 

AIR FORCE: ELLSWORTH AIR FORCE BASE: BASE OPERATIONS CENTER ........ ...................... 11,800 ∂11,800 

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: MOBRIDGE: READINESS CENTER ............................. 2,944 2,944 ......................

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: JOE FOSS FIELD: SQUADRON OPERATIONS FACILITY .. ...................... 7,000 ∂7,000 

TOTAL, SOUTH DAKOTA ....................................................................... 2,944 21,744 ∂18,800 

TENNESSEE 

AIR FORCE: ARNOLD AIR FORCE BASE: UPGRADE JET ENGINE AIR INDUCTION SYSTEM (PHASE V) ............................................................................. 22,000 22,000 ......................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: 

NASHVILLE: READINESS CENTER (PHASE I) ............................................ ...................... 9,142 ∂9,142 

SMYRNA: JOINT ARMED FORCES RESERVE CENTER ............................... ...................... 13,589 ∂13,589 
48 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Installation and project Budget 

request 

Committee 

recommendation 

Change from 

budget 

estimate 

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: 

MEMPHIS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT: 

C–5 AIRCRAFT PARKING APRON AND HYDRANT REFUEL SYSTEM ............................................................................................ 15,500 15,500 ......................

C–5 CORROSION CONTROL HANGAR ............................................. 26,000 26,000 ......................

TOTAL, TENNESSEE .................................................................... 63,500 86,231 ∂22,731 

TEXAS 

ARMY: 

FORT BLISS: 

CIDC FIELD OPERATIONS BUILDING ............................................... ...................... 3,600 ∂3,600 

MISSILE DEFENSE INSTRUCTION FACILITY ..................................... 16,500 16,500 ......................

FORT HOOD: 

BARRACKS COMPLEX ..................................................................... 49,888 49,888 ......................

DIGITAL MULTIPURPOSE RANGE ..................................................... 28,200 28,200 ......................

FORT SAM HOUSTON: GENERAL INSTRUCTION BUILDING ....................... ...................... 11,400 ∂11,400 

AIR FORCE: 

DYESS AIR FORCE BASE: FIRE CRASH RESCUE STATION ....................... ...................... 11,000 ∂11,000 

LACKLAND AIR FORCE BASE: SECURITY FORCES TRAINING EXPANSION .................................................................................................... 2,596 2,596 ......................

SHEPPARD AIR FORCE BASE: 

F–22 TECHNICAL TRAINING FACILITY ............................................. 21,284 21,284 ......................

STUDENT DORMITORY (300 ROOM) ............................................... 29,000 29,000 ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE: KINGSVILLE: REPLACE JET FUEL STORAGE TANK ................... 3,900 3,900 ......................

AIR FORCE RESERVE: 

LACKLAND AIR FORCE BASE: 

ADDITION/ALTERATION C–5 AIRCRAFT GENERATION FACILITY ....... 1,200 1,200 ......................

C–5 TRAINING LOAD ASSEMBLY FACILITY ..................................... 1,850 1,850 ......................

C–5 TRAINING SCHOOLHOUSE COMPLEX ....................................... 20,000 20,000 ......................

TOTAL, TEXAS ............................................................................. 174,418 200,418 ∂26,000 

UTAH 

AIR FORCE: 

HILL AIR FORCE BASE: 

FITNESS CENTER ............................................................................ 13,113 13,113 ......................

ICBM PROPELLANT ANALYSIS COMPLEX ........................................ ...................... 7,700 ∂7,700 

ARMY RESERVE: OGDEN: ADDITION/ALTERATION ARMY RESERVE CENTER .... 7,932 7,932 ......................

TOTAL, UTAH ....................................................................................... 21,045 28,745 ∂7,700 

VERMONT 

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT: AIR MOBILIZATION FACILITY .......................................................................................... ...................... 6,000 ∂6,000 

TOTAL, VERMONT ................................................................................ ...................... 6,000 ∂6,000 

VIRGINIA 

ARMY: 

FORT A.P. HILL: 

MOUT FACILITY (PHASE I) .............................................................. ...................... 10,800 ∂10,800 

SHOOT HOUSE ................................................................................ 3,975 3,975 ......................

FORT MYER: BARRACKS COMPLEX—SHERIDAN AVE (PHASE I) ............. 49,526 49,526 ......................

NAVY: 

CAMP ELMORE MARINE CORPS DETACHMENT: COMMAND OPERATIONS 

FACILITY .............................................................................................. 13,500 13,500 ......................

LITTLE CREEK: GATE 5 SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS ................................ 2,850 2,850 ......................

NORFOLK: 

GATE 5 SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS ................................................ 4,330 4,330 ......................

PIER 11 REPLACEMENT (PHASE II) ................................................ 40,000 40,000 ......................
49 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Installation and project Budget 

request 

Committee 

recommendation 

Change from 

budget 

estimate 

NAVAL AIR STATION OCEANA: POST 2 SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS ......... 2,770 2,770 ......................

QUANTICO: 

BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS ................................................... 15,090 15,090 ......................

GREEN SIDE HANGAR COMPLEX .................................................... 21,180 21,180 ......................

HERITAGE CENTER ROAD IMPROVEMENTS ..................................... 950 950 ......................

THE BASIC SCHOOL ARMORY ......................................................... 4,580 4,580 ......................

THE BASIC SCHOOL HEADQUARTERS/SERVICES BUILDING ............ ...................... 4,470 ∂4,470 

YORKTOWN: ORDNANCE HANDLING VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP ........ 9,870 9,870 ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE: 

DAM NECK: 

SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES HIGH EXPLOSIVE MAGAZINE ......... 1,400 1,400 ......................

SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES OPERATIONAL TRAINER SUPPORT 

FACILITY ADDITION ..................................................................... 4,300 4,300 ......................

DEFENSE DISTRIBUTION DEPOT RICHMOND: 

CONFERENCE CENTER .................................................................... 3,600 3,600 ......................

SECURITY ENHANCEMENTS ............................................................ 6,500 6,500 ......................

FORT A.P. HILL: SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES GROUND MOBILITY 

SUPPORT BUILDING ............................................................................ 1,500 1,500 ......................

FORT BELVOIR: HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT (PHASE I) .............................. 43,000 43,000 ......................

LANGLEY AIR FORCE BASE: ADDITION/ALTERATION HOSPITAL ............... 50,800 50,800 ......................

LITTLE CREEK: 

BOAT SUPPORT FACILITY ................................................................ 10,500 10,500 ......................

SEAL TEAM OPERATIONS CENTER .................................................. ...................... 9,000 ∂9,000 

SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES COMBAT SKILLS COMPOUND ........ 12,700 12,700 ......................

SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES GROUND MOBILITY MAINTENANCE 

FACILITY ..................................................................................... 1,000 1,000 ......................

NAVAL AIR STATION OCEANA: BULK FUEL STORAGE TANK ..................... 3,589 3,589 ......................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: 

FORT PICKETT: 

INFANTRY PLATOON BATTLE COURSE ............................................ 5,170 5,170 ......................

MILITARY OPERATIONS ON URBAN TERRAIN ASSAULT COURSE .... 1,409 1,409 ......................

NAVY RESERVE: NORFOLK: VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FACILITY ......................... 3,290 3,290 ......................

TOTAL, VIRGINIA .................................................................................. 317,379 341,649 ∂24,270 

WASHINGTON 

ARMY: 

FORT LEWIS: 

BARRACKS COMPLEX—41ST DIVISION DR/B ST (PHASE II) ......... 48,000 48,000 ......................

CHAPEL ........................................................................................... ...................... 9,200 ∂9,200 

NAVY: 

BANGOR: LIMITED AREA PRODUCTION AND STAGING COMPLEX ............ 35,770 35,770 ......................

BREMERTON: BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS—SHIPBOARD 

ASHORE ............................................................................................... 34,125 34,125 ......................

PUGET SOUND: AIRCRAFT CARRIER MAINTENANCE COMPLEX ............... 20,305 20,305 ......................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: CAMP MURRAY ARMY NATIONAL GUARD STATION 

ADDITION/ALTERATION READINESS CENTER ................................................ 1,400 1,400 ......................

ARMY RESERVE: VANCOUVER: LAND ACQUISITION .......................................... 2,500 ...................... ¥2,500 

TOTAL, WASHINGTON ........................................................................... 142,100 148,800 ∂6,700 

WEST VIRGINIA 

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: 

EASTERN WEST VIRGINIA REGIONAL AIRPORT (MARTINSBURG): 

C–5 MAINTENANCE HANGAR AND SHOPS ...................................... 36,000 36,000 ......................

C–5 AIRCRAFT PARKING APRON/HYDRANT SYSTEM ...................... ...................... 17,000 ∂17,000 

C–5 FLIGHT SIMULATOR ................................................................. ...................... 4,150 ∂4,150 

YEAGER AIR BASE: FIRE CRASH RESCUE STATION ................................ ...................... 6,000 ∂6,000 

TOTAL, WEST VIRGINIA ........................................................................ 36,000 63,150 ∂27,150 
50 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Installation and project Budget 

request 

Committee 

recommendation 

Change from 

budget 

estimate 

WISCONSIN 

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: 

TRUAX FIELD: ASA—MUNITIONS MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE COMPLEX .................................................................................................... 5,900 5,900 ......................

VOLK FIELD: SQUADRON OPERATIONS FACILITY ..................................... ...................... 4,500 ∂4,500 

ARMY RESERVE: 

FORT MC COY: 

INFANTRY PLATOON BATTLE COURSE ............................................ 2,712 2,712 ......................

SQUAD DEFENSE RANGE ................................................................ 1,248 1,248 ......................

TOTAL, WISCONSIN ..................................................................... 9,860 14,360 ∂4,500 

WYOMING 

AIR FORCE: F.E. WARREN AIR FORCE BASE: STORMWATER DRAINAGE SYSTEM .............................................................................................................. ...................... 5,500 ∂5,500 

BAHAMAS 

NAVY: ANDROS ISLAND: BACHELOR QUARTERS ............................................... 20,750 ...................... ¥20,750 

TOTAL, BAHAMAS ................................................................................ 20,750 ...................... ¥20,750 

DIEGO GARCIA 

NAVY: DIEGO GARCIA: SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CENTER .......................... 17,500 17,500 ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE: DIEGO GARCIA: DENTAL CLINIC REPLACEMENT ..................... 3,800 3,800 ......................

TOTAL, DIEGO GARCIA ........................................................................ 21,300 21,300 ......................

GERMANY 

ARMY: 

GRAFENWOEHR: 

BARRACKS COMPLEX ..................................................................... 28,500 28,500 ......................

BARRACKS COMPLEX—BRIGADE ................................................... 34,000 34,000 ......................

BRIGADE SUPPORT COMPLEX ........................................................ 14,700 14,700 ......................

AIR FORCE: 

RAMSTEIN AIR BASE: 

SMALL DIAMETER BOMB FACILITIES .............................................. 1,200 1,200 ......................

U.S. AIR FORCE THEATER AEROSPACE OPERATIONS SUPPORT 

CENTER ...................................................................................... 24,204 24,204 ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE: 

GRAFENWOEHR: 

ADDITION/ALTERATION DISPENSARY/DENTAL CLINIC ..................... 13,000 13,000 ......................

ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE SCHOOL ....................................................... 36,247 36,247 ......................

VILSECK: HIGH SCHOOL RENOVATION/ADDITION ..................................... 9,011 9,011 ......................

TOTAL, GERMANY ................................................................................ 160,862 160,862 ......................

GREENLAND 

AIR FORCE: THULE AIR BASE: DORMITORY (72 ROOM) .................................. 19,800 19,800 ......................

TOTAL, GREENLAND ............................................................................ 19,800 19,800 ......................

GUAM 

NAVY: 

AGAT: WATER TREATMENT PLANT UPGRADE ........................................... 20,700 20,700 ......................

FINEGAYAN: KILO WHARF IMPROVEMENTS .............................................. 12,500 12,500 ......................

AIR FORCE: ANDERSEN AIR FORCE BASE: WAR RESERVE STORAGE FACILITY ........................................................................................................... 19,593 19,593 ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE: 

AGANA HEIGHTS NAVAL HOSPITAL COMPOUND: GUAM HIGH SCHOOL 

REPLACEMENT .................................................................................... 26,964 26,964 ......................
51 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Installation and project Budget 

request 

Committee 

recommendation 

Change from 

budget 

estimate 

NAVAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY: SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES GROUND 

MOBILITY SUPPORT BUILDING ............................................................ 2,200 2,200 ......................

TOTAL, GUAM .................................................................................. 81,957 81,957 ......................

ITALY 

ARMY: LIVORNO: WAREHOUSE OPERATIONS FACILITY ..................................... 26,000 26,000 ......................

NAVY: 

SIGONELLA: 

ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS ................................................................ 7,430 7,430 ......................

BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT (PHASE II) ........................................ 15,120 15,120 ......................

AIR FORCE: 

AVIANO AIR BASE: 

ADDITION/ALTERATION WEAPONS LOAD/MAINTENANCE TRAINING 

FACILITY ..................................................................................... 2,300 2,300 ......................

AIRFIELD OBSTRUCTION—EXPAND NORTH RAMP (PHASE I) ......... 1,626 1,626 ......................

FLIGHT SIMULATOR ......................................................................... 2,834 2,834 ......................

TOTAL, ITALY .............................................................................. 55,310 55,310 ......................

JAPAN 

AIR FORCE: MISAWA AIR BASE: EXPAND STRATEGIC AIRLIFT RAMP ............... 6,700 ...................... ¥6,700 

DEFENSE-WIDE: MISAWA AIR BASE: HYDRANT FUEL SYSTEM ......................... 19,900 ...................... ¥19,900 

TOTAL, JAPAN ...................................................................................... 26,600 ...................... ¥26,600 

KOREA 

ARMY: CAMP HUMPHREYS: SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM ................................... 12,000 12,000 ......................

AIR FORCE: 

KUNSAN AIR BASE: 

DORMITORY (144 ROOM) ............................................................... 18,550 18,550 ......................

DORMITORY (144 ROOM) ............................................................... 18,550 18,550 ......................

OSAN AIR BASE: DORMITORY (156 ROOM) ............................................. 18,600 18,600 ......................

TOTAL, KOREA ..................................................................................... 67,700 67,700 ......................

PORTUGAL 

AIR FORCE: LAJES FIELD: ADDITION/ALTERATION FITNESS CENTER (PHASE 

II) ................................................................................................................. 5,689 5,689 ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE: LAJES FIELD: REPLACE HYDRANT FUEL SYSTEM ................... 19,113 19,113 ......................

TOTAL, PORTUGAL ............................................................................... 24,802 24,802 ......................

PUERTO RICO 

ARMY RESERVE: AGUADILLA: ARMY RESERVE CENTER ................................... 21,523 ...................... ¥21,523 

TOTAL, PUERTO RICO .......................................................................... 21,523 ...................... ¥21,523 

SPAIN 

NAVY: NAVAL STATION ROTA: COMMAND OPERATIONS CONSOLIDATION ......... 32,700 ...................... ¥32,700 

AIR FORCE: NAVAL STATION ROTA: AIRCRAFT PARKING APRON (PHASE II) .... 14,153 ...................... ¥14,153 

TOTAL, SPAIN ...................................................................................... 46,853 ...................... ¥46,853 

UNITED KINGDOM 

AIR FORCE: ROYAL AIR FORCE LAKENHEATH: 4-BAY MISSION TRAINING 

CENTER ........................................................................................................ 5,500 5,500 ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE: ROYAL AIR FORCE MILDENHALL: SPECIAL OPERATIONS 

FORCES OPERATIONS/INTELLIGENCE FACILITY ............................................ 10,200 ...................... ¥10,200 

TOTAL, UNITED KINGDOM .................................................................... 15,700 5,500 ¥10,200 
52 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Installation and project Budget 

request 

Committee 

recommendation 

Change from 

budget 

estimate 

NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION (NATO) 

NATO SECURITY INVESTMENT PROGRAM ......................................................... 165,800 165,800 ......................

WORLDWIDE CLASSIFIED 

AIR FORCE: 

CLASSIFIED LOCATION: 

CLASSIFIED ..................................................................................... 28,090 28,090 ......................

SPECIAL TACTICAL UNIT DETACHMENT FACILITY ........................... 704 704 ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE: 

CLASSIFIED LOCATION: 

SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES BUILDING ADDITION ...................... 2,600 2,600 ......................

SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES INFORMATION OPERATIONS FACILITY ADDITION ............................................................................. 4,800 4,800 ......................

TOTAL, WORLDWIDE CLASSIFIED ........................................... 36,194 36,194 ......................

WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED 

ARMY: 

UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE LOCATIONS: 

HOST NATION SUPPORT .................................................................. 21,000 21,000 ......................

PLANNING AND DESIGN .................................................................. 130,335 166,216 ∂35,881 

UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION ............................................ 20,000 21,400 ∂1,400 

NAVY: 

UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE LOCATIONS: 

PLANNING AND DESIGN .................................................................. 87,067 110,277 ∂23,210 

UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION ............................................ 12,000 12,000 ......................

PRESIDENTIAL HELICOPTER PROGRAMS SUPPORT FACILITY ......... 80,000 ...................... ¥80,000 

WHITE SIDE COMPLEX .................................................................... 18,560 18,560 ......................

AIR FORCE: 

UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE LOCATIONS: 

PLANNING AND DESIGN .................................................................. 140,786 180,507 ∂39,721 

UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION ............................................ 13,000 15,240 ∂2,240 

PREDATOR B BEDDOWN ................................................................. 26,121 26,121 ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE: 

UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE LOCATIONS: 

CONTINGENCY CONSTRUCTION ...................................................... 10,000 10,000 ......................

ENERGY CONSERVATION INVESTMENT PROGRAM .......................... 60,000 60,000 ......................

SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND ................................................... 2,900 2,900 ......................

PLANNING AND DESIGN: 

SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND .......................................... 10,566 13,146 ∂2,580 

PLANNING AND DESIGN ......................................................... 22,216 23,790 ∂1,574 

TRICARE MANAGEMENT ACTIVITY .......................................... 29,400 29,400 ......................

SUBTOTAL, PLANNING AND DESIGN .................................. 62,182 66,336 ∂4,154 

UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION: 

TRICARE MANAGEMENT ACTIVITY .......................................... 3,002 3,002 ......................

SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND .......................................... 2,710 2,710 ......................

MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY ................................................... 2,769 2,769 ......................

DEFENSE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING SERVICE .................... 1,497 1,497 ......................

UNDISTRIBUTED ..................................................................... 3,000 3,000 ......................

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE DEPENDENT EDUCATION ............ 746 746 ......................

THE JOINT STAFF ................................................................... 7,214 7,214 ......................

SUBTOTAL, UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION ............ 20,938 20,938 ......................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: 

UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE LOCATIONS: 

PLANNING AND DESIGN .................................................................. 30,845 41,269 ∂10,424 

UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION ............................................ 4,472 14,856 ∂10,384 
53 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Installation and project Budget 

request 

Committee 

recommendation 

Change from 

budget 

estimate 

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: 

UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE LOCATIONS: 

PLANNING AND DESIGN .................................................................. 13,568 27,943 ∂14,375 

UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION ............................................ 5,500 7,790 ∂2,290 

ARMY RESERVE: 

UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE LOCATIONS: 

PLANNING AND DESIGN .................................................................. 11,225 14,503 ∂3,278 

UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION ............................................ 2,923 2,923 ......................

NAVY RESERVE: UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE LOCATIONS: PLANNING AND DESIGN ............................................................................................................. 1,503 2,953 ∂1,450 

AIR FORCE RESERVE: 

VARIOUS WORLDWIDE LOCATIONS: 

PLANNING AND DESIGN .................................................................. 5,493 7,660 ∂2,167 

UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION ............................................ 5,263 5,263 ......................

TOTAL, WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED ............................................. 785,681 856,655 ∂70,974 

FAMILY HOUSING, ARMY 

ALASKA: 

FORT RICHARDSON (92 UNITS ................................................................ 42,000 42,000 ......................

FORT WAINWRIGHT (100 UNITS) ............................................................. 41,000 41,000 ......................

FORT WAINWRIGHT (60 UNITS) ............................................................... 37,000 37,000 ......................

FORT WAINWRIGHT (86 UNITS) ............................................................... 46,000 46,000 ......................

ARIZONA: 

FORT HUACHUCA (205 UNITS) ................................................................ 41,000 41,000 ......................

YUMA (55 UNITS) .................................................................................... 14,900 14,900 ......................

KANSAS: FORT RILEY (126 UNITS) ................................................................... 33,000 33,000 ......................

NEW MEXICO: WHITE SANDS (156 UNITS) ....................................................... 31,000 31,000 ......................

OKLAHOMA: FORT SILL (247 UNITS) ................................................................ 47,000 47,000 ......................

VIRGINIA: 

FORT LEE (218 UNITS) ............................................................................ 46,000 46,000 ......................

FORT MONROE (68 UNITS) ...................................................................... 16,000 16,000 ......................

CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS ...................................................................... 211,990 211,990 ......................

PLANNING AND DESIGN .................................................................................... 29,209 29,209 ......................

SUBTOTAL, CONSTRUCTION ............................................................ 636,099 636,099 ......................

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE: 

UTILITIES ACCOUNT ................................................................................. 132,356 132,356 ......................

SERVICES ACCOUNT ................................................................................ 36,174 36,174 ......................

MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT ......................................................................... 74,895 74,895 ......................

MISCELLANEOUS ACCOUNT ..................................................................... 1,333 1,333 ......................

FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT .......................................................................... 37,411 37,411 ......................

LEASING ................................................................................................... 218,033 218,033 ......................

MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY ........................................................ 402,060 402,060 ......................

MORTGAGE INSURANCE PREMIUM .......................................................... 1 1 ......................

PRIVATIZATION SUPPORT COSTS ............................................................. 26,644 26,644 ......................

SUBTOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE ....................................... 928,907 928,907 ......................

TOTAL, FAMILY HOUSING, ARMY ......................................................... 1,565,006 1,565,006 ......................

FAMILY HOUSING, NAVY AND MARINE CORPS 

NORTH CAROLINA: CHERRY POINT MARINE CORPS AIR STATION (198 

UNITS) .......................................................................................................... 27,002 27,002 ......................

CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS ...................................................................... 112,105 112,105 ......................

SUBTOTAL, CONSTRUCTION ............................................................ 139,107 139,107 ......................

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE: 

UTILITIES ACCOUNT ................................................................................. 137,226 137,226 ......................

FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT .......................................................................... 20,756 20,756 ......................
54 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Installation and project Budget 

request 

Committee 

recommendation 

Change from 

budget 

estimate 

MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT ......................................................................... 81,859 81,859 ......................

MISCELLANEOUS ACCOUNT ..................................................................... 654 654 ......................

SERVICES ACCOUNT ................................................................................ 57,691 57,691 ......................

LEASING ................................................................................................... 136,883 136,883 ......................

MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY ........................................................ 252,383 252,383 ......................

MORTGAGE INSURANCE PREMIUM .......................................................... 61 61 ......................

PRIVATIZATION SUPPORT COSTS ............................................................. 16,991 16,991 ......................

SUBTOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE ....................................... 704,504 704,504 ......................

TOTAL, FAMILY HOUSING, NAVY AND MARINE CORPS ........................ 843,611 843,611 ......................

FAMILY HOUSING, AIR FORCE 

ARIZONA: DAVIS-MONTHAN AIR FORCE BASE (250 UNITS) ............................. 48,500 48,500 ......................

CALIFORNIA: 

EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE (218 UNITS) ............................................... 41,202 41,202 ......................

VANDENBERG AIR FORCE BASE (120 UNITS) ......................................... 30,906 30,906 ......................

FLORIDA: 

MACDILL AIR FORCE BASE ...................................................................... 1,250 1,250 ......................

MACDILL AIR FORCE BASE (61 UNITS) ................................................... 21,723 21,723 ......................

IDAHO: MOUNTAIN HOME AIR FORCE BASE (147 UNITS) ................................ 39,333 39,333 ......................

MISSISSIPPI: COLUMBUS AIR FORCE BASE ..................................................... 711 711 ......................

MISSOURI: WHITEMAN AIR FORCE BASE (160 UNITS) ..................................... 37,087 37,087 ......................

MONTANA: MALMSTROM AIR FORCE BASE (115 UNITS) .................................. 29,910 29,910 ......................

NORTH CAROLINA: SEYMOUR JOHNSON AIR FORCE BASE (167 UNITS) .......... 32,693 32,693 ......................

NORTH DAKOTA: 

GRAND FORKS AIR FORCE BASE (90 UNITS) .......................................... 26,169 26,169 ......................

MINOT AIR FORCE BASE (142 UNITS) ..................................................... 37,087 37,087 ......................

SOUTH CAROLINA: CHARLESTON AIR FORCE BASE ......................................... 1,976 1,976 ......................

SOUTH DAKOTA: ELLSWORTH AIR FORCE BASE (75 UNITS) ............................ 21,482 21,482 ......................

TEXAS: 

DYESS AIR FORCE BASE (127 UNITS) .................................................... 28,664 28,664 ......................

GOODFELLOW AIR FORCE BASE (127 UNITS) ......................................... 20,604 20,604 ......................

GERMANY: RAMSTEIN AIR BASE (144 UNITS) .................................................. 57,691 57,691 ......................

ITALY: AVIANO AIR BASE .................................................................................. 2,542 2,542 ......................

KOREA: OSAN AIR BASE (117 UNITS) .............................................................. 46,834 46,834 ......................

UNITED KINGDOM: ROYAL AIR FORCE LAKENHEATH (154 UNITS) ................... 43,976 43,976 ......................

CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS ...................................................................... 238,353 238,353 ......................

PLANNING AND DESIGN .................................................................................... 38,266 38,266 ......................

SUBTOTAL, CONSTRUCTION ................................................................ 846,959 846,959 ......................

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE: 

UTILITIES ACCOUNT ................................................................................. 125,459 125,459 ......................

MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT ......................................................................... 70,680 62,898 ¥7,782 

SERVICES ACCOUNT ................................................................................ 26,070 26,070 ......................

FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT .......................................................................... 44,459 44,459 ......................

MISCELLANEOUS ACCOUNT ..................................................................... 2,396 2,396 ......................

LEASING ................................................................................................... 119,908 119,908 ......................

MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY ........................................................ 435,782 435,782 ......................

MORTGAGE INSURANCE PREMIUM .......................................................... 38 38 ......................

PRIVATIZATION SUPPORT COSTS ............................................................. 39,104 39,104 ......................

SUBTOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE ....................................... 863,896 856,114 ¥7,782 

TOTAL, FAMILY HOUSING, AIR FORCE ................................................. 1,710,855 1,703,073 ¥7,782 

FAMILY HOUSING, DEFENSE-WIDE 

CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS (NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY) (NSA) ......... 49 49 ......................

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE: 

UTILITIES ACCOUNT (NSA) ....................................................................... 471 471 ......................

FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT (NSA) ................................................................ 116 116 ......................
55 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Installation and project Budget 

request 

Committee 

recommendation 

Change from 

budget 

estimate 

MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT (NSA) ............................................................... 13 13 ......................

MISCELLANEOUS ACCOUNT (NSA) ........................................................... 53 53 ......................

SERVICES ACCOUNT (NSA) ...................................................................... 381 381 ......................

LEASING (NSA) ........................................................................................ 11,257 11,257 ......................

MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY (NSA) .............................................. 1,939 1,939 ......................

FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT (DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY) .................. 3,925 3,925 ......................

LEASING (DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY) .......................................... 30,199 30,199 ......................

UTILITIES ACCOUNT (DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY (DLA)) ..................... 419 419 ......................

FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT (DLA) ................................................................ 36 36 ......................

SERVICES ACCOUNT (DLA) ...................................................................... 76 76 ......................

MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT (DLA) ............................................................... 293 293 ......................

MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY (DLA) .............................................. 397 397 ......................

SUBTOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE ....................................... 49,575 49,575 ......................

TOTAL, FAMILY HOUSING, DEFENSE-WIDE .......................................... 49,624 49,624 ......................

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FAMILY HOUSING IMPROVEMENT FUND ................ 2,500 2,500 ......................

BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT ................................................ 246,116 246,116 ......................

GENERAL PROVISION ........................................................................................ 63,000 ...................... ¥63,000 

GRAND TOTAL ..................................................................................... 9,553,375 10,003,000 ∂449,625 

RECAPITULATION 

ARMY ................................................................................................................ 1,771,285 1,977,166 ∂205,881 

RESCISSION ............................................................................................. ...................... ...................... ......................

NAVY ................................................................................................................. 1,060,455 1,016,315 ¥44,140 

RESCISSION ............................................................................................. ...................... ...................... ......................

AIR FORCE ........................................................................................................ 663,964 841,131 ∂177,167 

RESCISSION ............................................................................................. ...................... ...................... ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE ................................................................................................. 709,337 696,491 ¥12,846 

RESCISSION ............................................................................................. ...................... ...................... ......................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD ................................................................................... 295,657 381,765 ∂86,108 

AIR NATIONAL GUARD ...................................................................................... 127,368 231,083 ∂103,715 

ARMY RESERVE ................................................................................................ 87,070 66,325 ¥20,745 

NAVAL RESERVE ............................................................................................... 25,285 33,735 ∂8,450 

AIR FORCE RESERVE ........................................................................................ 84,556 101,373 ∂16,817 

TOTAL, MILITARY CONSTRUCTION ....................................................... 4,824,977 5,345,384 ∂520,407 

NATO INFRASTRUCTURE ................................................................................... 165,800 165,800 ......................

FAMILY HOUSING, ARMY .................................................................................. 1,565,006 1,565,006 ......................

(CONSTRUCTION) ..................................................................................... (636,099 ) (636,099 ) ......................

(RESCISSION) ................................................................................. ...................... ...................... ......................

(OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE) ............................................................ (928,907 ) (928,907 ) ......................

FAMILY HOUSING, NAVY AND MARINE CORPS ................................................. 843,611 843,611 ......................

(CONSTRUCTION) ..................................................................................... (139,107 ) (139,107 ) ......................

(RESCISSION) ................................................................................. ...................... ...................... ......................

(OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE) ............................................................ (704,504 ) (704,504 ) ......................

FAMILY HOUSING, AIR FORCE .......................................................................... 1,710,855 1,703,073 ¥7,782 

(CONSTRUCTION) ..................................................................................... (846,959 ) (846,959 ) ......................

(RESCISSION) ................................................................................. ...................... ...................... ......................

(OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE) ............................................................ (863,896 ) (856,114 ) (¥7,782 ) 

FAMILY HOUSING, DEFENSE-WIDE .................................................................... 49,624 49,624 ......................

(CONSTRUCTION) ..................................................................................... (49 ) (49 ) ......................

(OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE) ............................................................ (49,575 ) (49,575 ) ......................

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FAMILY HOUSING IMPROVEMENT FUND ................ 2,500 2,500 ......................

BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT ................................................ 246,116 246,116 ......................

CHEMICAL DEMILITARIZATION CONSTRUCTION, DEFENSE-WIDE ...................... 81,886 81,886 ......................

GENERAL PROVISION ........................................................................................ 63,000 ...................... ¥63,000 
56 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued 

[In thousands of dollars] 

Installation and project Budget 

request 

Committee 

recommendation 

Change from 

budget 

estimate 

GRAND TOTAL ..................................................................................... 9,553,375 10,003,000 ∂449,625 

Æ