alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 3700.20 Does this part apply to me? This part and, through this part, pertinent portions of the OMB guidance in subparts A through I of 2 CFR part (see table at 2 CFR 180.100(b)) apply to you if you are a— ( a ) Participant or principal in a “covered transaction” (see subpart B of 2 CFR part 180 and the definition of “nonprocurement transaction” at 2 CFR 180.970);
( b ) Respondent in a Peace Corps suspension or debarment action;
( c ) Peace Corps debarment or suspension official; or
( d ) Peace Corps grants officer, agreements officer, or other official authorized to enter into any type of nonprocurement transaction that is a covered transaction.
#### § 782.400 What method do I use as an agency awarding official to obtain a recipient's agreement to comply with the OMB guidance?

To obtain a recipient's agreement to comply with applicable requirements in the OMB guidance at 2 CFR part 182, you must include the following term or condition in the award:

*Drug-free workplace.* You as the recipient must comply with drug-free workplace requirements in subpart B (or subpart C, if the recipient is an individual) of 782, which adopts the Government-wide implementation (2 CFR part 182) of sec. 5152-5158 of the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 (Pub. L. 100-690, Title V, Subtitle D; 41 U.S.C. 701-707).
# L_2007176DE.01004201.xml

| 6.7.2007 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 176/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.7.2007

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 176/42

---

Berichtigung der Richtlinie 89/173/EWG des Rates vom 21. Dezember 1988 zur Angleichung der Rechtsvorschriften der Mitgliedstaaten über bestimmte Bauteile und Merkmale von land- oder forstwirtschaftlichen Zugmaschinen auf Rädern

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften L 67 vom 10. März 1989
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften L 67 vom 10. März 1989

Seite 110, Anhang IV, Anlage 4, dritter Gedankenstrich

anstatt:

| „— | den Buchstaben D oder ST gemäß dem Prüfverfahren, dem die mechanische Verbindungseinrichtung unterzogen wurde (D = dynamische Prüfung/ST = statische Prüfung), oberhalb des Rechtecks mit dem Buchstaben ‚e‘.“ |
| --- | --- |

„—

den Buchstaben D oder ST gemäß dem Prüfverfahren, dem die mechanische Verbindungseinrichtung unterzogen wurde (D = dynamische Prüfung/ST = statische Prüfung), oberhalb des Rechtecks mit dem Buchstaben ‚e‘.“

muss es heißen:

| „— | den Buchstaben D oder S gemäß dem Prüfverfahren, dem die mechanische Verbindungseinrichtung unterzogen wurde (D = dynamische Prüfung/S = statische Prüfung), oberhalb des Rechtecks mit dem Buchstaben ‚e‘.“ |
| --- | --- |

„—

den Buchstaben D oder S gemäß dem Prüfverfahren, dem die mechanische Verbindungseinrichtung unterzogen wurde (D = dynamische Prüfung/S = statische Prüfung), oberhalb des Rechtecks mit dem Buchstaben ‚e‘.“

---
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Altair International
Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended March 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alan M. Smith, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|Date: August 17, 2016 |  | /s/ Alan M. Smith      
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                      |  | Alan M. Smith          
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23.2



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Eagle Point Software Corporation and Subsidiary

We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Eagle Point Software
Corporation and Subsidiary (Company) as of June 30, 2001 and 2000, and for each
of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2001, and have issued our report
thereon dated July 27, 2001; such reports are included elsewhere in the Form 10-
K. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of the Company
listed in Item 14. This consolidated financial statement schedule is the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, such consolidated financial
statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated
financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects
the information set forth therein.


Deloitte & Touche LLP

July 27, 2001

                                     -80-
#### § 120.20 General.

This subpart augments subpart A of this part by setting forth specific requirements for process controls.
§ 708.33 Procedure for appeals. ( a ) By the 15th day after filing a notice of appeal under § 708.32, the appellant must file a statement identifying the issues that it wishes the OHA Director to review. A copy of the statement must be served on the other parties, who may file a response by the 20th day after receipt of the statement. Any response must also be served on the other parties.
( b ) In considering the appeal, the OHA Director: ( 1 ) Will possess all powers necessary to adjudicate the appeal.
( 2 ) Will review findings of fact for clear error and conclusions of law *de novo;* and
( 3 ) Will close the record on appeal after receiving the last submission permitted under this section.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1005 

To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to permit 

certain summer food pilot programs to be carried out in all States 

and by all service institutions. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 11, 2005 

Mr. LUGAR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch 

Act to permit certain summer food pilot programs to 

be carried out in all States and by all service institutions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS. 

4 Congress finds that— 

5 (1) proper nutrition is a key to childhood health 

6 and equal educational opportunities; 

7 (2) each day, more than 28,000,000 children 

8 participate in Federal school meal programs; 
2 

•S 1005 IS

(3) more than 1 1 ⁄2 of those children receive free 

2 or reduced price meals due to low household income; 

3 (4) in 1969, Congress established the summer 

4 food service program because the nutrition needs of 

5 low income children do not subside when the school 

6 year ends; 

7 (5) in 1999, Congress introduced a pilot pro8 gram allowing 13 States and Puerto Rico to stream9 line administrative procedures; 

10 (6) participation in the summer food service 

11 program in the pilot States greatly increased, while 

12 average participation in the nonparticipating States 

13 decreased; 

14 (7) in 2005, due to the success of the pilot pro15 gram, Congress authorized an additional 6 States to 

16 participate in the pilot program; and 

17 (8) increased efforts to meet the summer nutri18 tional needs of all children in the United States 

19 should be employed. 

20 SEC. 2. SUMMER FOOD PILOT PROJECTS. 

21 Section 18(f) of the Richard B. Russell National 

22 School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1769(f)) is amended by 

23 striking paragraph (1) and inserting the following: 
3 

•S 1005 IS

1 ‘‘(1) DEFINITION OF ELIGIBLE STATE.—In this 

2 subsection, the term ‘eligible State’ has the meaning 

3 given the term ‘State’ in section 12(d).’’. 

Æ
§ 2701.1 Adoption of 2 CFR Part 200. ( a ) Under the authority listed above, the U.S. Small Business Administration adopts the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Guidance in 2 CFR part 200, except for 2 CFR 200.74, 200.92, and 200.93. Thus, this part gives regulatory effect to the OMB guidance and supplements the guidance as needed for the Administration.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-17-0000713

04-JUN-2018

10:29 AM
Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF SYSTEMAX INC.

DOMESTIC SUBSIDIARIES

| | 1. | Global Computer Supplies Inc. (a New York corporation)
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | Global Equipment Company Inc. (a New York corporation)
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------

| | 3. | Dartek Corporation (a Delaware corporation)
| | -- | -------------------------------------------

| | 4. | Nexel Industries Inc. (a New York corporation)
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------

| | 6. | Tiger Direct Inc. (a Florida corporation)
| | -- | -----------------------------------------

| | 7. | Systemax Manufacturing Inc. (a Delaware corporation)
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------

FOREIGN SUBSIDIARIES

| | 1. | Misco Germany Inc. (a New York corporation)
| | -- | -------------------------------------------

| | 2. | Misco Italy Computer Supplies S.P.A. (an Italian corporation)
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------

| | 3. | H C S Global SA (a French corporation)
| | -- | --------------------------------------

| | 4. | Systemax Europe Ltd. (a U.K. corporation)
| | -- | -----------------------------------------

| | 5. | Global Computer Products BV (a Dutch corporation)
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------

| | 6. | Dabus Dataproducktor AB (a Swedish corporation)
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------

| | 7. | Misco Iberia Computer Supplies S.A. (a Spanish corporation)
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 2

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 2
EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 2

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 2
# United Stat es Court of Appeals For the First C ircuit

No. 04-1506 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,
v. ALVIN JACKSON, Defendant, Appellant.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE [Hon. D. Brock Hornby, U.S. District Judge ]
Before Lynch, Circuit Judge , Campbell, Senior Circuit Judge , and Howard, Circuit Judge .
Holly T. Smith for appellant. Margaret D. McGaughey , Appellate Chief, with whom Paula D. Silsby , United States Attorney, was on brief, for appellee.

June 2, 20051 In Shepard , the Supreme Court considered whether th e

defendant's prior burglary conviction constituted a "violent felony" under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1), a provision of the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA). The § 924(e)(1) definition of "violent felony" is " the same in all material respects" as the U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1 definition of a "crime of violence." United States v. Bell , 966 F.2d 703, 704 (1st Cir. 1992). Given the similarity, "we look generallyto cases pertaining to either provision 'to elucidate the nature of the categorical inquiry.'" United States v. Delgado , 288 F.3d 49, 53 n.5 (1st Cir. 2002). -2- CAMPBELL, Senior Circuit Judge . The defen dant appeals from his sentence, arguing, inter alia , that the sentencing court erroneouslyrelied on police reports in determining whether he pled guiltyto a prior "crime of violence" qualifyi ng for sentencing enhancement under the career offender guideline, U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1. This appeal was briefed and argued shortly before the Supreme Court handeddown its de cisio n in Shepardv. United States , 125 S. Ct. 1254 (2005), holding that a sentencing court may not look to police reports for this purpose. 1 Recognizing that a decision in Shepard
was imminent and would be relevant, this court withheld any disposition pending the issuance of Shepard . Now that that case has been decided, we vacate the district court's senten ce and remand to it for resentencing in light of Shepard .

So ordered .
§ 1.1109 How will FDA make information about recognized accreditation bodies and LAAF-accredited laboratories available to the public? FDA will place on its website a publicly available registry listing of: ( a ) Recognized accreditation bodies, including for each: the name, contact information, and duration of recognition of the recognized accreditation body;
( b ) Accreditation bodies that have a change in recognition, including for each: the name of the accreditation body, the specific change in recognition (*i.e.,* probation, revocation of recognition, denial of renewal of recognition, relinquishment of recognition, or expiration of recognition) and the effective date of the change;
( c ) LAAF-accredited laboratories, including for each: the name, contact information, and scope of LAAF-accreditation, and the name and contact information of the recognized accreditation body that has LAAF-accredited the laboratory; and
( d ) Laboratories that have a change in LAAF-accreditation, including for each: the name of the laboratory, the specific change in LAAF-accreditation (*i.e.,* suspension, reduction of scope, or withdrawal of LAAF-accreditation by the recognized accreditation body, probation or disqualification by FDA, or relinquishment of LAAF-accreditation), and the effective date of the change.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 908 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 908

 Congratulating Italy on winning the 2006 Federation Internationale de 
                 Football Association (FIFA) World Cup.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 11, 2006

Mr. Fossella (for himself, Mr. Mica, Mr. King of New York, Mr. Kuhl of 
   New York, Mr. Ferguson, Mr. Payne, Mr. Boehlert, Mr. Nadler, Mr. 
Crowley, Mr. Tiberi, and Mr. Towns) submitted the following resolution; 
     which was referred to the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Congratulating Italy on winning the 2006 Federation Internationale de 
                 Football Association (FIFA) World Cup.

Whereas for the first time in 24 years, the Italian National Soccer Team won the 
        Federation Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) World Cup;
Whereas Italy is one of the most successful countries in World Cup history, 
        reaching the finals 6 times and winning 4 four championships, in 1934, 
        1938, 1982, and 2006;
Whereas the 2006 championship is due in large part to the extraordinary 
        leadership of head coach Marcello Lippi and team Captain Fabio 
        Cannavaro;
Whereas in 2006, team Italy (known as ``Azzurri'' or simply ``the Blue'') went 
        undefeated in World Cup play and won the final game in only the second 
        World Cup Championship to be determined by shoot-out;
Whereas in winning the World Cup, the Italian National Soccer Team faced 
        adversity and overcame setbacks;
Whereas the vibrant culture and heritage of Italy were brought to our Nation by 
        millions of Italian immigrants;
Whereas Italian Americans have made significant contributions to our Nation in 
        all fields of endeavor, including the notable scientist and Staten 
        Island resident Antonio Meucci, the inventor of the telephone;
Whereas Italian Americans rejoiced in the victory of the soccer team of their 
        ancestral homeland, many spontaneously celebrating in American 
        neighborhoods throughout our Nation;
Whereas all Americans can take pride in the knowledge that the United States 
        National Soccer Team was the only team that Italy was unable to defeat 
        during this World Cup, needing to settle with a 1-1 tie; and
Whereas the fans of the Italian National Soccer team, many hailing from the 
        United States, represent some of the most enthusiastic in the world: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives congratulates Italy 
and the Italian National Soccer team on winning the 2006 Federation 
Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) World Cup.
                                 <all>
```
EX-35.6


(logo) Rialto
       CAPITAL


February 28, 2014


To: Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation as Depositor
    Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Trustee
    Midland Loan Services, A Division of PNC Bank, National Association as
    Master Servicer


2013 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123)

Name of Mortgage Loan Pass-Through Certificate Series:

* COMM 2013-LC6

(Referred to herein as "Security Agreement" or "Security Agreements")

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as
special servicer (the "Special Servicer") herein certifies to the following:

1. All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under
   each of the Security Agreements are performed on behalf of the Special
   Servicer.

2. A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special
   Servicer for the period of January 30, 2013, to December 31, 2013(the
   "Reporting Period") in accordance with the servicing agreements applicable
   to each Security Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.

3. To the best of my knowledge, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its
   obligations under the terms of the Security Agreements, in all material
   respects for the Reporting Period and if there has been a failure to fulfill
   any such obligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature
   and status thereof has been specifically identified herewith.


Certified by:  /s/ Thekla Salzman
               Thekla Salzman
               Chief Administrative Officer

Date: February 28, 2014
First Amendment to Administrative Services Agreement



 Exhibit 10.4 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO 
 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AGREEMENT 
 This First Amendment to Administrative Services Agreement (the “Amendment”) dated August 1, 2006 is by and between North Carolina
Radiation Therapy Management Services, Inc., a North Carolina corporation (“MANAGEMENT SERVICES”) and Radiation Therapy Associates of Western North Carolina, P.A., a North Carolina professional corporation (“PC”).
The terms defined in this Amendment shall have the same meaning set forth in the Administrative Services Agreement unless otherwise set forth herein. 
 WITNESSETH: 
 WHEREAS, MANAGEMENT SERVICES and PC are parties that certain
Administrative Services Agreement entered into as of January, 2002 (the “Administrative Services Agreement”); 
 WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Administrative Services Agreement to clarify each party’s obligations with respect to fees for professional services; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants herein contained and for other valuable consideration, receipt of which is
hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 
 1. Section 1.10. Fees for Professional Services. of the
Administrative Services Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety as follows: 
 “1.10. Fees for Professional Services.
MANAGEMENT SERVICES shall be solely responsible for routine ordinary legal, accounting and other professional services incurred by the PC in operating the Practice absent a violation by the PC of any provisions of this Agreement; provided, however,
PC shall be responsible for the cost of, and reimburse MANAGEMENT SERVICES for, the out-of pocket expenses incurred by MANAGEMENT SERVICES from time in connection with any additional or extraordinary professional services rendered for the benefit of
the PC.” 
 2. Except as set forth herein, the Administrative Services Agreement shall in all respects continue to be, and shall remain,
unaltered and in full force and effect in accordance with its terms. This Amendment may be signed in one or more counterparts and by facsimile, all of which shall be considered one and the same agreement. 







 [The remainder of the page is blank and the signature page follows.] 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment on the date set forth herein. 
  

			
	 NORTH CAROLINA RADIATION THERAPY
 MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ David M. Koeninger

	 Name:
	 	David M. Koeninger
	 Title:
	 	Vice President

  

			
	 RADIATION THERAPY ASSOCIATES OF
 WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA, P.A.

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Daniel E. Dosoretz

	 Name:
	 	Daniel E. Dosoretz
	 Title:
	 	Vice President
U.S. Geological SurveyOpen-File Report 03-220 Version 1.0 

*Prepared in Collaboration with the*Russian Academy of Sciences, Mongolian Academy of Sciences, Jilin University (Changchun Branch), Korean Institute of Geology, Mining, and Materials, *and* Geological Survey of Japan/AIST. 

Significant Metalliferous and Selected Non-Metalliferous Lode Deposits, and Selected Placer Districts of Northeast Asia 

*By* Sodov Ariunbileg, Gennandiy V. Biryul'kin, Jamba Byamba, Yury V. Davydov, Gunchin Dejidmaa, Elimir G. Distanov, Dangindorjiin Dorjgotov, Gennadiy N. Gamyanin, Ochir Gere, Valeriy Yu. Fridovskiy, Ayurzana Gotovsuren, Duk Hwan Hwang, Anatoliy P. Kochnev, Alexei V. Kostin, Mikhail I. Kuzmin, Sergey A. Letunov, Xujun Li, Galina D. Malceva, V.D. Melnikov, Valeriy M. Nikitin, Alexander A. Obolenskiy, Masatsugu Ogasawara, Demberel Orolmaa, Leonid M. Parfenov, Nikolay V. Popov, Andrei V. Prokopiev, Vladimir Ratkin, Sergey M. Rodionov, Zhan V. Seminskiy, Vladimir I. Shpikerman, Alexander P. Smelov, Vitaly I. Sotnikov, Alexander V. Spiridonov, Valeriy V. Stogniy, Sadahisa Sudo, Fengyue Sun, Jiapeng Sun, Weizhi Sun, Valeriy M. Supletsov, Vladimir F. Timofeev, Oleg A. Tyan, Valeriy G. Vetluzhskikh, Aihua Xi, Yakov V. Yakovlev, Hongquan Yan, Vladimir I. Zhizhin, Nikolay N. Zinchuk *and* Lydia M. Zorina.

*Editors*: Warren J. Nokleberg1, Tatiana M. Bounaeva2, Robert J. Miller1, Zhan V. Seminskiy3, *and* Michael F. Diggles1.

2003 

1 U.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park, CA 940252 Institute of Geochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Irkutsk, Russia 3 Irkutsk State Technical University, Irkutsk 

*A Mongolian woman geologist logs part of the several thousand meters of diamond drill cores that delineated the large copper-gold deposit at the Turquoise Hill (Oyu Tolgoi) Mine in central Mongolia. Photograph courtesy of Ivanhoe Mines.Introduction
This report contains a digtial database on lode deposits and placer districts of Northeast Asia. This region includes Eastern Siberia, Russian Far East, Mongolia, Northeast China, South Korea, and Japan. In folders on this site are a detailed database, a bibliography of cited references, descriptions of mineral deposit models, and a mineral deposit location map. Data are provided for 1,674 significant lode deposits and 91 significant placer districts of the region.*
#### § 1002.3 Notification to user of performance and technical data.

The Director and Deputy Director of the Center for Devices and Radiological Health, as authorized under delegated authority, may require a manufacturer of a radiation emitting electronic product to provide to the ultimate purchaser, at the time of original purchase, such performance data and other technical data related to safety of the product as the Director or Deputy Director finds necessary.

[69 FR 17292, Apr. 2, 2004]