alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(logo)Crowe

 

 

**CroweLLP**

IndependentMember Crowe Global

 

 

REPORT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

 

Boardof Directors

ColonyCapital AMC OPCO, LLC 

LosAngeles, California

 

 

Wehave examined management's assertion, included in the accompanyingCertification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria thatColony Capital AMC OPCO, LLC (the "Company") complied with theservicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and ExchangeCommission's Regulation AB, as of December 31, 2018 and for the period January1, 2018 to December 31, 2018 (the "Reporting Period") for thecommercial mortgage-backed security transactions or commercial mortgage loans includedin a commercial mortgage-backed security or other securitization transaction,for which the Company is named as a special servicer and is required to complywith Regulation AB (the "Platform") except for servicing criteria1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(1)(v), 1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(ii-iv),1122(d)(4)(ii), 1122(d)(4)(v), and 1122(d)(4)(ix-xv), for which the Company hasdetermined are not applicable to the activities performed with respect to thePlatform. Exhibit B to management's Certification Regarding Compliance withApplicable Servicing Criteria identifies the individual transactions defined bymanagement as constituting the Platform. Management is responsible for theCompany's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibilityis to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.

 

Ourexamination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of thePublic Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliancewith the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures aswe considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testingof selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise thePlatform, testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, anddetermining whether the Company processed those selected transactions andperformed those servicing activities in compliance with the applicableservicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactionsand servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered bythe report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arisingfrom errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that mayhave affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Companyduring the period covered by this report. We believe that our examinationprovides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide alegal determination on the Company's compliance with the applicable servicingcriteria.

 

Inour opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with theaforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of December 31, 2018 and for theperiod January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018 for the Platform is fairly stated,in all material respects.

 

 

/s/Crowe LLP

CroweLLP

 

CostaMesa, California 

February28, 2019
§ 1.382 What labeling or marking requirements apply to a detained article of food? The officer or qualified employee of FDA issuing a detention order under § 1.393 may label or mark the detained article of food with official FDA tags or labels that include the following information: ( a ) A statement that the article of food is detained by FDA in accordance with section 304(h) of the act;
( b ) A statement that the article of food must not be consumed, moved, altered, or tampered with in any manner for the period shown, without the written permission of an authorized FDA representative;
( c ) A statement that the violation of a detention order or the removal or alteration of the tag or label is a prohibited act, punishable by fine or imprisonment or both; and
( d ) The detention order number, the date and hour of the detention order, the detention period, and the name of the officer or qualified employee of FDA who issued the detention order.
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 194 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that any comprehensive 

plan to reform our national energy policy must promote American energy 

security and develop the abundant resources of the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 10, 2017 

Mr. LATTA submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 

Science, Space, and Technology, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

any comprehensive plan to reform our national energy 

policy must promote American energy security and develop the abundant resources of the United States. 

Whereas the United States total annual energy consumption 

is approximately 97.7 quadrillion BTU; 

Whereas the United States has greatly increased domestic oil 

production over the last decade, leading to net imports of 

petroleum decreasing to 24 percent, the lowest number 

since 1970; 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 194 IH 

Whereas the United States has seen natural gas reserves and 

production exceed estimates, and due to this is expected 

to be a net exporter by 2020; 

Whereas nuclear power has supplied approximately one-fifth 

of annual United States electricity since 1990 and provides approximately 60 percent of the carbon-free electricity of the United States; 

Whereas renewable sources of energy account for 11 percent 

of domestic energy production; and 

Whereas the United States has abundant coal reserves, including a demonstrated reserve base estimated to contain 

477 billion short tons: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that in order to meet our Nation’s long-term 

3 energy demands the following must be addressed in any 

4 comprehensive energy bill considered by the 115th Con5 gress: 

6 (1) Encouraging technological innovations to 

7 exploit our vast supply of natural gas. 

8 (2) Increasing our domestic oil production, in9 frastructure, and refining capacity. 

10 (3) Exploring and investing in the current nu11 clear fleet and advanced reactor technologies. 

12 (4) Taking advantage of our domestic coal sup13 ply through processes such as carbon capture, utili14 zation, and storage. 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 194 IH 

1 (5) Using expanded renewable and alternative 

2 energy sources. 

3 (6) Supporting additional research and develop4 ment through new and innovative methods, including 

5 public-private partnerships. 

6 (7) Promoting increased conservation and en7 ergy efficiency. 

8 (8) Enhancing consumer awareness and edu9 cation regarding domestic energy use, supply, and 

10 development. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### In the Matter of Gordon Haskell, Respondent, v Frank X. Gargiulo et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondents, and Barry Hurowitz, Appellant.

In a proceeding, *inter alia,*to invalidate petitions designating Barry Hurowitz as a candidate in the Democratic Party primary election to be held on September 9, 1980, for the public office of Civil Court Judge for the 1st Municipal District, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 21, 1980 which granted the application. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, proceeding dismissed and the board of elections is directed to place the name of Barry Hurowitz on the appropriate ballot (see *Matter of Rodriguez v Izzo,*78 AD2d 529). Mollen, P. J. Damiani, Mangano and Gulotta, JJ., concur.
(September 11, 1980)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William McClain, Appellant.

Judgment Supreme Court, New York County, rendered on October 4, 1979, unanimously affirmed. Defendant-appellant is directed to make restitution in the amount of $150 per month for five years as. indicated in the judgment appealed from and the case is remitted to the Supreme Court, New York County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Birns, Markewich and Silverman, JJ.
**CURCIO****WIESELTHIER****+COHEN****Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**Managing Member Park Bridge Lender Services LLC New York, NY We  have  examined  management's  assertion,  included  in  the  accompanying  Management's  Report  on Assessment  of  2014  Compliance  by  Park  Bridge  Lender  Services  LLC  with  Regulation  AB  Servicing Criteria  ("Management's  Report"),  that  Park  Bridge  Lender  Services  LLC  (the  "Company")  complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation  AB  as  of  and  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2014,  excluding  those  criteria  noted  as  not applicable (N/A) within Exhibit B to Management's Report. The transactions covered by this report are only those transactions processed by the Company in its capacity as trust advisor or operating advisor for the  asset  backed  securities  transactions  (the  "Platform")  identified  in  Management's  Report.  Reference Exhibit  A  to  Management's  Report  for  the  transactions  covered  by  this  examination.  Management  is responsible for the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination. Our  examination  was  conducted  in  accordance  with  attestation  standards  of  the  Public  Company Accounting  Oversight  Board  (United  States)  and,  accordingly,  including  examining,  on  a  test  basis, evidence  about  the  Company's  compliance  with  the  applicable  servicing  criteria  and  performing  such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of a selected  sample  of  the  servicing  activities  related  to  the  Platform,  determining  whether  the  Company performed  those  selected  activities  in  compliance  with  the  applicable  servicing  criteria  during  the specified  period.  Our  procedures  were  limited  to  the  selected  transactions  and  servicing  activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our examination was not designed to detect material noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests, that may have affected the Company's servicing activities during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria identified in Exhibit B to Management's Report with respect to the transactions identified in Exhibit A to Management's Report as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014, for the Platform, is fairly stated in all material aspects. /s/ Curcio, Wieselthier & Cohen, C.P.A.'S, P.C. New York, NY  February 20, 2015 CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS PC 7 PENN PLAZA, SUITE 1500 NEW YORK NY 10001 TEL: 212 557-9800  FAX: 212 557 9819   WEBSITE: WWW.CWCCPAFIRM.COM
#### § 1.384 When does a detention order terminate?

If FDA terminates a detention order or the detention period expires, an authorized FDA representative will issue a detention termination notice releasing the article of food to any person who received the detention order or that person's representative and will remove, or authorize in writing the removal of, the required labels or tags. If FDA fails to issue a detention termination notice and the detention period expires, the detention is deemed to be terminated.
oneworld Alliance

'-; oneworld Management Company Inc 2 Park Avenue Suite 1100 New York NY 10016 USA +1 212 716 0500 Fax +1 212 251 6870 info@oneworld.com www.oneworld.com

Samuel Podberesky**~··~** i l ;j·**:._.;··~**

Assistant General Counsel forAviation Enforcement and Proceedings U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 9 May, 2013 Re: Your letter dated 23 April (Re: Oneworld Displays ofAir Carrier Surcharges and Ta>:es) Dear Mr. Podberesky: Please find below ou ·answers to the questions posed in your letter referenced above. (1) Why did the oMC R

## ;·w booking engine fail to display properly the distinction bet.,reen taxes and governmentfees on the one hand and carrier-imposed surcharges on the other and over what period oftimE. did this failure occur? The D.O.T.'s Additional Guidance on Airfare/Air Tour Price Advertisements did not come to the attention of oMC until we were contacted by member carrier Cathay Pacific Airways on 

### 7 February, 2013. Changes to the RTW booking engine were made as quickly as possible following that, with full effect as of 

### 18 February. (2) According to the Cathay response, oMC revised its displaysto note accurately the taxessurcharge distinction. Please confirm thatthe site now properly displays an accurate breakdown ofadditional charges which distinguishes between taxes and governmentfees, on the one hand, and carrier-imposed surcharges, on the other, for all its members. We confirm that the site now properly displays an accurate breakdown ofadditional charges which distinguishes between taxes and government fees, on the one hand, and carrier-imposed surcharges, on the other, for all oneworld members. (3) In orderto determinewhether oMC is a ticket agentwithin thescope of49 U.S.C. 

### §

# ~oirberlin40102(a)(45), we requestthat you describe how oMC derives its revenue. Does oMC sell air transportation through its website or is the actual sale madethrough 

### a website of a member carrier? oMC does not sell air transportation through its website, the actual sale is made through the reservation centers of member carriers.

AmericanAirlines'"\. 

# -**~.- ·~**  BRITISH AIRWAYS .--

### ~CATHAY PACIFIC 

### FINNRIR

JAPANAIRLINES 

### LAN

## ~QANTAS 

# -**~** AlRUNES

### Does oMC get a percentage of RTW sales or is there flat membership fee annually for each member, regardless ofsize and amountofsales generated or is there some other basis for compensation? oMC is not compensated in sny way for RTW sal 

## I 

# Ii .

If you need any further information, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Best regards,

# (~"-~t~,~:·L--:c 

# \"-·\**L\.c~-** 

# ..---/-_ Stephen M. Usery / --.....,_"-' Vice President
- Commercial ·



### 2
Order entered December 21, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00563-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF O.A.L. AND R.L., MINOR CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 301st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-21-11690

ORDER

We questioned our jurisdiction over this restricted appeal from the trial 

court’s divorce decree as the clerk’s record reflected the trial court had granted a 

new trial and set aside the decree, mooting the appeal. On December 1, 2022, the 

trial court vacated its new trial order and reinstated the decree in accordance with 

our opinion in appellate cause numbers 05-22-00793-CV and 05-22-00794-CV, 

original proceedings challenging that very order. Accordingly, it appears we have 

jurisdiction over the appeal. 

As the appellate record has been filed, we ORDER appellant to file his brief 

no later than January 20, 2023.

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 31.1
 
 CERTIFICATIONS
 
 I, Emil H. Soika, President and Chief Executive Officer of Criticare Systems, Inc., certify that:
 
 1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Criticare Systems, Inc.;
 
 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 (a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 (b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
  (c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 (a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
  (b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
 
 Date:  February 4, 2004
  Emil H. Soika
 President and Chief Executive Officer
  2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

DESMIN WALKER, §

§ No. 362, 2021

Defendant Below, §

Appellant, § Court Below—Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

v. §

§ Cr. ID No: N2003012057

STATE OF DELAWARE, §

§

Appellees. §

Submitted: July 20, 2022

Decided: July 27, 2022

Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and TRAYNOR, Justices.

ORDER 

This 27th day of July, 2022, after consideration of the parties’ briefs and the 

record on appeal, it appears to the Court that the judgment of the Superior Court

should be affirmed on the basis of its October 12, 2021 Memorandum Opinion.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior 

Court is AFFIRMED. 

BY THE COURT: 

/s/ Gary F. Traynor

Justice
# L_2013084EN.01002902.xml

| 23.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 84/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 84/29

---

Corrigendum to Council Directive 91/496/EEC of 15 July 1991 laying down the principles governing the organization of veterinary checks on animals entering the Community from third countries and amending Directives 89/662/EEC, 90/425/EEC and 90/675/EEC

(
  Official Journal of the European Communities L 268 of 24 September 1991
  )

On page 67, Article 30, paragraph 2, first subparagraph:

for:

‘2.   Detailed rules for applying this Directive, and in particular those concerning Article 8 (3), shall be adopted...’,

read:

‘2.   Detailed rules for applying this Directive, and in particular those concerning Article 8, point B, shall be adopted...’.

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.01

LIST OF REGISTRANT'S SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                AMOUNT OWNED
         NAME                                       JURISDICTION                BY REGISTRANT
         ----                                       ------------                -------------
<S>                                                 <C>                         <C>
HNC Insurance Solutions, Inc.                        California                     100%
HNC Financial Solutions, Inc.*                       Illinois                       100%
HNC Software International, Inc.                     Delaware                       100%
Center for Adaptive Systems Applications, Inc.       Delaware                       100%
Onyx Technologies, Inc.                              Georgia                        100%
Advanced Information Management Solutions, Inc.      California                     100%
Celerity Technologies, Inc.                          Ohio                           100%
Systems/Link Corporation                             Delaware                       100%

(*formerly Financial Technology, Inc.)
</TABLE>
Useof Air Temperature Data to Anticipate theOnset of Snowmelt-Season Landslides

*By* Alan F. Chleborad

**
 
**
**
***Open-File Report 98-124***
**
----

| Name                                                                                      |   | Incorporated      In |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------|
| BNC      National Bank                                                                    |   | National      Bank   |
| BNC      Insurance Services, Inc. (a Subsidiary of BNC National    Bank)                  |   | Arizona              |
| BNC      Asset Management, Inc., (a Subsidiary of BNC NationalBank)                       |   | North      Dakota    |
| Milne/BNC      Insurance Nevada, Inc. (a Subsidiary of BNC Insurance Services,      Inc.) |   | Nevada               |
| Bismarck      Properties, Inc.                                                            |   | North      Dakota    |
| BNC      Capital Trust I                                                                  |   | Delaware      Trust  |
| BNC      Statutory Trust III                                                              |   | Delaware      Trust  |

----