alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 101

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 101 appear at 63 FR 14035, Mar. 24, 1998, 66 FR 17358, Mar. 30, 2001, 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001, and 81 FR 49895, July 29, 2016.

#### § 101.10 Nutrition labeling of restaurant foods whose labels or labeling bear nutrient content claims or health claims.

Nutrition labeling in accordance with § 101.9 shall be provided upon request for any restaurant food or meal for which a nutrient content claim (as defined in § 101.13 or in subpart D of this part) or a health claim (as defined in § 101.14 and permitted by a regulation in subpart E of this part) is made, except that information on the nutrient amounts that are the basis for the claim (*e.g.,* “low fat, this meal provides less than 10 grams of fat”) may serve as the functional equivalent of complete nutrition information as described in § 101.9. For the purposes of this section, restaurant food includes two categories of food. It includes food which is served in restaurants or other establishments in which food is served for immediate human consumption or which is sold for sale or use in such establishments. It also includes food which is processed and prepared primarily in a retail establishment, which is ready for human consumption, which is of the type described in the previous sentence, and which is offered for sale to consumers but not for immediate human consumption in such establishment and which is not offered for sale outside such establishment. For standard menu items that are offered for sale in covered establishments (as defined in § 101.11(a)), the information in the written nutrition information required by § 101.11(b)(2)(ii)(A) will serve to meet the requirements of this section. Nutrient levels may be determined by nutrient databases, cookbooks, or analyses or by other reasonable bases that provide assurance that the food or meal meets the nutrient requirements for the claim. Presentation of nutrition labeling may be in various forms, including those provided in § 101.45 and other reasonable means.

[79 FR 71253, Dec. 1, 2014]
#### § 910.505 Sanctions.

In cases of continued inability or unwillingness to have an audit conducted in accordance with this part, DOE and pass-through entities must take appropriate action as provided in 2 CFR 200.339, Remedies for noncompliance.

[79 FR 76024, Dec. 19, 2014, as amended at 87 FR 15321, Mar. 18, 2022]
# m8726.docx

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 27.2.2018 C(2018) 1356 final To the notifying parties: Subject : Case M.8726 - ONEY / 4FINANCE / JV Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 1 and Article 57 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area 2 Dear Sir or Madam, 1. On 5 February 2018 , the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which Oney Bank S.A. (France), controlled by Auchan Holding (France), and 4finance Holding S.A. (Luxembourg), controlled by Tirona Limited (Cyprus), acquire within the meaning of Articles 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of Finey S.A., a newly created company constituting a joint venture . The concentration is accomplished by way of a purchase of shares . 3 2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are: - Oney provides credit services for purchases made in shops owned by Auchan Holding, its subsidiaries or other commercial partners. - 4finance offers personal loans online, via call centres and through third-party credit distributors . - Finey , the join venture, will offer unsecured cash loans to customers in Poland. 3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5 ( c ) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 . 4 4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation and Article 57 of the EEA Agreement . For the Commission
( S igned)
Johannes LAITENBERGER Director - General
(1)
OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ( the ' Merger Regulation ' ). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( ' TFEU ' ) has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of ' Community ' by ' Union ' and ' common market ' by ' internal market ' . The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.
(2) OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3 ( the ' EEA Agreement ' ).
(3) Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 51 , 10.2.2018 , p. 6 .
(4)
OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5 .
§ 1.644 What quality assurance procedures must a third-party certification body have to qualify for accreditation? A third-party certification body seeking accreditation must demonstrate that it has: ( a ) Implemented a written program for monitoring and evaluating the performance of its officers, employees, and other agents involved in auditing and certification activities, including procedures to: ( 1 ) Identify deficiencies in its auditing and certification program or performance; and
( 2 ) Quickly execute corrective actions that effectively address any identified deficiencies; and
( b ) The capability to meet the quality assurance requirements of § 1.655, if accredited.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 892 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 892

Expressing support for SummerSet DC in the Nation's capital to benefit 
the District of Columbia and regional residents as well as visitors and 
      to honor the public service of the performers and partners.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 15, 2018

 Ms. Norton submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing support for SummerSet DC in the Nation's capital to benefit 
the District of Columbia and regional residents as well as visitors and 
      to honor the public service of the performers and partners.

Whereas the District of Columbia Commission on the Arts and Humanities and the 
        Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, in cooperation with the 
        National Park Service, are sponsoring SummerSet DC every Thursday from 
        May 10 to June 7, 2018, from noon to 2 p.m.;
Whereas many District of Columbia residents and Federal and other employees work 
        downtown and in the vicinity of the National Mall;
Whereas the National Mall is a national and regional tourist attraction;
Whereas SummerSet DC offers free musical entertainment to workers and visitors 
        alike and opens the summer months by encouraging full use of this unique 
        space;
Whereas the National Mall is a national treasure, supported by United States 
        taxpayers to provide a unique park space with potential for various 
        kinds of outdoor enjoyment;
Whereas many talented amateur and professional musicians reside in the District 
        of Columbia;
Whereas the National Mall provides a natural stage for the display of city and 
        regional talent;
Whereas SummerSet DC will feature local performers and be located on the 
        National Mall in front of the National Air and Space Museum; and
Whereas 2018 is the seventh season of SummerSet DC, formerly known as Lunchtime 
        Music on the Mall: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives recognizes and 
commends--
            (1) SummerSet DC for providing enhancement to urban life 
        and musical culture in the Nation's capital and appreciation of 
        the outdoors at the National Mall;
            (2) local performers bringing their talents to SummerSet 
        DC; and
            (3) the District of Columbia Commission on the Arts and 
        Humanities and the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit 
        Authority, in cooperation with the National Park Service, for 
        their public service in providing live music performances at no 
        charge to the public.
                                 <all>
```
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO. A-1117-18T3

IN THE MATTER OF

MODESTO MIRANDA,

Deceased.

_______________________

Argued September 18, 2019 – Decided

Before Judges Haas and Mayer.

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, 

Chancery Division, Bergen County, Docket No. P000102-18.

Joanna R. Adu argued the cause for appellant Victor 

Miranda (Lyons & Associates, PC, attorneys; Joanna R. 

Adu, on the briefs).

Colin M. Quinn argued the cause for respondent Maria 

Miranda.

PER CURIAM

In this will contest matter, plaintiff Victor Miranda appeals from the 

Chancery Division's September 26, 2018 order dismissing his complaint which 

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the 

internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3.

September 25, 2019
2

A-1117-18T3

sought to set aside the last will and testament of his father, Modesto Miranda, 1

and revoke the letters testamentary issued to his sister, defendant Maria 

Miranda, as the executrix of Modesto's estate. In his cogent written decision, 

Judge James J. DeLuca found that plaintiff's complaint was untimely under Rule

4:85-1 because plaintiff did not file it within four months after Modesto's will 

was probated. The judge also determined that plaintiff failed to establish 

exceptional circumstances under Rule 4:50-1(f) to warrant reopening the 

judgment admitting Modesto's will to probate, or the relaxation of the Rule 4:85-

1 time limitations.

On appeal, plaintiff raises the following contentions:

I. THE TRIAL COURT ERRED AS A MATTER 

OF LAW WHEN IT FAILED TO FIND A 

GENUINE ISSUE OF MATERIAL FACT.

A. THE TRIAL COURT ERRED AS A 

MATTER OF LAW IN HOLDING THAT 

PLAINTIFF RECEIVED ACTUAL NOTICE.

B. THE TRIAL COURT ERRED AS A 

MATTER OF LAW WHEN IT HELD THAT 

PLAINTIFF DID NOT ESTABLISH 

EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES 

WARRANTING RELIEF PURSUANT TO 

RULE 4:50-1.

 

1

 Because the plaintiff and defendant share the same name as their deceased 

father, we refer to the decedent as "Modesto" in this opinion. In doing so, we 

intend no disrespect.
3

A-1117-18T3

II. THE CIRCUMSTANCES IN THIS CASE 

WARRANT RELAXATION OF THE TIME 

LIMITATION SET FORTH IN RULE 4:85-1, 

PURSUANT TO RULE 1:1-2(a).

We conclude that plaintiff's arguments are without sufficient merit to 

warrant discussion in a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E). We affirm 

substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge DeLuca in his thoughtful 

written decision that thoroughly addressed plaintiff's claims.

Affirmed.
§ 1309.42 Certificate of registration; denial of registration. ( a ) The Administrator shall issue a Certificate of Registration (DEA Form 511) to an applicant if the issuance of registration or reregistration is required under the applicable provisions of section 303 of the Act (21 U.S.C. 823). In the event that the issuance of registration or reregistration is not required, the Administrator shall deny the application. Before denying any application, the Administrator shall issue an order to show cause pursuant to Section 1309.46 and, if requested by the applicant, shall hold a hearing on the application pursuant to § 1309.51.
( b ) The Certificate of Registration (DEA Form 511) shall contain the name, address, and registration number of the registrant, the activity authorized by the registration, the amount of fee paid, and the expiration date of the registration. The registrant shall maintain the certificate of registration at the registered location in a readily retrievable manner and shall permit inspection of the certificate by any official, agent or employee of the Administration or of any Federal, State, or local agency engaged in enforcement of laws relating to List I chemicals or controlled substances.
# EUR-Lex - 31994D0041 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31994D0041

**94/41/EC: Commission Decision of 25 January 1994 amending Decision 87/119/EEC as regards the list of establishments in Brazil approved for the purpose of importing meat products into the Community **

*
Official Journal L 022 , 27/01/1994 P. 0051 - 0052 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 55 P. 0375 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 55 P. 0375 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 25 January 1994 amending Decision 87/119/EEC as regards the list of establishments in Brazil approved for the purpose of importing meat products into the Community (94/41/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 72/462/EEC of 12 December 1972 on health and veterinary inspection problems upon importation of bovine, ovine and caprine animals and swine, fresh meat or meat products from third countries (1), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1601/92 (2), and in particular Article 4 (1) thereof,

Whereas a list of establishments in Brazil, approved for the purpose of importing meat products into the Community, was drawn up initially by Commission Decision 87/119/EEC (3), as last amended by Decision 92/485/EEC (4);

Whereas a Community on-the-spot visit to meat product establishments in Brazil has revealed that the level of hygiene in one establishment has improved since the last inspection;

Whereas the list of establishments should be amended accordingly;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Annex to Decision 87/119/EEC is hereby replaced by the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 January 1994.

For the Commission

René STEICHEN

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 302, 31. 12. 1972, p. 28.

(2) OJ No L 173, 27. 6. 1992, p. 13.

(3) OJ No L 49, 18. 2. 1987, p. 37.

(4) OJ No L 290, 6. 10. 1992, p. 13.

ANNEX

LIST OF ESTABLISHMENTS

"" ID="1">SIF 7> ID="2">Swift Armour SA Indústria e Comércio> ID="3">Santana do Livramento, Rio Grande do Sul"> ID="1">SIF 10> ID="2">Swift Armour SA Indústria e Comércio> ID="3">Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo"> ID="1">SIF 76> ID="2">SA Frigorífico Anglo> ID="3">Barretos, Sao Paulo"> ID="1">SIF 226> ID="2">BE Comércio e Indústria, Importaçao e Exportaçao SA> ID="3">Bagé, Rio Grande do Sul"> ID="1">SIF 337> ID="2">Frigorífico Bertin Ltda> ID="3">Lins, Sao Paulo"> ID="1">SIF 381> ID="2">Frigorífico Kaiowa SA> ID="3">Guarulhos, Sao Paulo"> ID="1">SIF 385> ID="2">Sadia Oeste SA Indústria e Comércio> ID="3">Andradina, Sao Paulo"> ID="1">SIF 458> ID="2">Swift Armour SA Indústria e Comércio> ID="3">Presidente Epitácio, Sao Paulo"> ID="1">SIF 736> ID="2">Sola SA Indústrias Alimentícias> ID="3">Três Rios, Rio de Janeiro"> ID="1">SIF 2015> ID="2">Sadia Oeste SA Indústria e Comércio> ID="3">Várzea Grande, Mato Grosso"> ID="1">SIF 2979> ID="2">Frigorífico Araputanga SA> ID="3">Araputanga, Mato Grosso">
MEDIATION REFERRALS

The following eases have been referred to mediation pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(6):

2007-2020.

#### State ex rel. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Indus. Comm.

Franklin App. No. 06AP-968, 2007-Ohio-4799.
#### § 1.377 What definitions apply to this subpart?

The definitions of terms that appear in section 201 of the act (21 U.S.C. 321) apply when the terms are used in this subpart. In addition, for the purposes of this subpart:

*Act* means the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.

*Authorized FDA representative* means an FDA Division Director in whose division the article of food involved is located or an FDA official senior to such director.

*Calendar day* means every day shown on the calendar.

*Food* has the meaning given in section 201(f) of the act (21 U.S.C. 321(f)). Examples of food include, but are not limited to, fruits, vegetables, fish, dairy products, eggs, raw agricultural commodities for use as food or components of food, animal feed, including pet food, food and feed ingredients and additives, including substances that migrate into food from food packaging and other articles that contact food, dietary supplements and dietary ingredients, infant formula, beverages, including alcoholic beverages and bottled water, live food animals, bakery goods, snack foods, candy, and canned foods.

*Perishable food* means food that is not heat-treated; not frozen; and not otherwise preserved in a manner so as to prevent the quality of the food from being adversely affected if held longer than 7 calendar days under normal shipping and storage conditions.

*We* means the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

*Working day* means any day from Monday through Friday, excluding Federal holidays.

*You* means any person who received the detention order or that person's representative.

[69 FR 31701, June 4, 2004, as amended at 85 FR 16550, Mar. 24, 2020]
Editorial Note on Part 106
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 106 appear at 81 FR 49895, July 29, 2016.

§ 106.6 Production and in-process control system. ( a ) A manufacturer shall conform to the requirements of this subpart by implementing a system of production and in-process controls. This production and in-process control system shall cover all stages of processing, from the receipt and acceptance of the raw materials, ingredients, and components through the storage and distribution of the finished product and shall be designed to ensure that all the requirements of this subpart are met.
( b ) The production and in-process control system shall be set out in a written plan or set of procedures that is designed to ensure that an infant formula is manufactured in a manner that will prevent adulteration of the infant formula.
( c ) At any point, step, or stage in the production process where control is necessary to prevent adulteration, a manufacturer shall: ( 1 ) Establish specifications to be met;
( 2 ) Monitor the production and in-process control point, step, or stage;
( 3 ) Establish a corrective action plan for use when a specification established in accordance with paragraph (c)(1) of this section is not met;
( 4 ) Review the results of the monitoring required by paragraph (c)(2) of this section, and review and evaluate the public health significance of any deviation from specifications that have been established in accordance with paragraph (c)(1) of this section. For any specification established in accordance with paragraph (c)(1) of this section that a manufacturer fails to meet, an individual qualified by education, training, or experience shall conduct a documented review and shall make a material disposition decision to reject the affected article, to reprocess or otherwise recondition the affected article, or to approve and release the article for use or distribution; and
( 5 ) Establish recordkeeping procedures, in accordance with § 106.100(e)(3), that ensure that compliance with the requirements of this section is documented.
( d ) Any article that fails to meet a specification established in accordance with paragraph (c)(1) of this section shall be controlled under a quarantine system designed to prevent its use pending the completion of a documented review and material disposition decision.
#### § 182.35 By when must a Federal agency implement the guidance?

Federal agencies must submit proposed regulations to the OMB for review within nine months of the issuance of this part and issue final regulations within eighteen months of the guidance.
§ 1130.605 Copyrights asserted in works developed or otherwise acquired under awards. ( a ) *OMB guidance.* OMB guidance in 2 CFR 200.315(b) addresses recipients' and the Federal Government's rights related to works that recipients may copyright under grants and cooperative agreements.
( b ) *DoD implementation.* DoD implements 2 CFR 200.315(b) through award terms and conditions that specify recipient and DoD rights with respect to copyrightable works.
( c ) *Award terms and conditions.* A DoD Component's general terms and conditions must use the wording appendix F to this part provides for Section A of PROP Article VI to affirm the recipient's right to assert copyright in works it develops or otherwise acquires under an award, as well as DoD's right to use the works for Federal purposes.
#### § 1250.95 Insect control.

Vessels shall be maintained free of infestation by flies, mosquitoes, fleas, lice, and other insects known to be vectors in the transmission of communicable diseases, through the use of screening, insecticides, and other generally accepted methods of insect control.
|  (logo) WELLS

           FARGO | Commercial Mortgage Servicing

D1086-120, 12th Floor 

550 South Tryon Street 

Charlotte, NC 28202

1-800-326-1334 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1, 2012, by and among Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, Torchlight Loan Services, LLC, as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2012-CCRE4 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 10.11 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of March 2016.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober 

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President 

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

|  Wells Fargo Bank, N.A |  (logo) Together we’ll go far

  |
|-----------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
#### Stephen D. FREEMAN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 05-3323.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Oct. 24, 2005.

Stephen D. Freeman, Christian J. Moran, pro se.

ORDER

Petitioner having filed the required Statement Concerning Discrimination, it is

ORDERED that the order of dismissal and the mandate be, and the same hereby are, VACATED and RECALLED, and the petition for review is REINSTATED.

Petitioner’s brief is due within 21 days from the date of filing of this order.