alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 31989D0198 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31989D0198

**89/198/EEC: Commission Decision of 3 March 1989 withholding approval of a second addendum to the addendum to the Danish programme relating to the manufacture of processed fruit and vegetable products, in accordance with Council Regulation (EEC) No 355/77 (Only the Danish text is authentic) **

*
Official Journal L 073 , 17/03/1989 P. 0054 - 0054 *

*****

COMMISSION DECISION

of 3 March 1989

withholding approval of a second addendum to the addendum to the Danish programme relating to the manufacture of processed fruit and vegetable products, in accordance with Council Regulation (EEC) No 355/77

(Only the Danish text is authentic)

(89/198/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 355/77 of 15 February 1977 on common measures to improve the conditions under which agricultural and fishery products are processed and marketed (1), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1760/87 (2), and in particular Article 5 thereof,

Whereas on 29 December 1986 the Danish Government submitted a second addendum to the addendum (3) to the programme relating to the manufacture of processed fruit and vegetable products (4);

Whereas the investments relating to pea starch cannot be accepted, given the situation on the starch market and the competition between the different raw materials;

Whereas the main production proposed, i.e. proteins, is not one of the products mentioned in Annex II of the Treaty;

Whereas the proposed investment would allow only a small part of the Member State's pea production to be processed and would not provide any significant increase at Community level in the means of disposing of the basic products concerned;

Whereas the programme submitted by the Danish Government fails to meet the requirements set out in Article 2 of Regulation (EEC) No 355/77;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Agricultural Structure,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Approval of the second addendum to the addendum to the programme relating to the manufacture of processed fruit and vegetable products, communicated by the Danish Government on 29 December 1986, is hereby withheld.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Denmark.

Done at Brussels, 3 March 1989.

For the Commission

Ray MAC SHARRY

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 51, 23. 2. 1977, p. 1.

(2) OJ No L 167, 26. 6. 1987, p. 1.

(3) OJ No L 6, 8. 1. 1987, p. 30.

(4) OJ No L 73, 16. 3. 1984, p. 78.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Accupoll Holding Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Dennis Vadura, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

February 23, 2004

Signed,

/s/ Dennis Vadura
--------------
Dennis Vadura
CEO
AccuPoll Holding Corp.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, an other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0152

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

DAVID JON KINDT,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including February 22, 2021, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 16 2021

01/19/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0152
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23.1

      CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 333-14843) pertaining to the Amended and Restated Inference
Corporation 1993 Stock Option Plan, (Form S-8 No. 333-01416) pertaining to the
Amended and Restated Inference Corporation 1993 Stock Option Plan, Fourth
Amended and Restated Inference Corporation Incentive Stock Option Plan and
Inference Corporation Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan and Stock Option
Agreements, and (Form S-8 No. 333-08451) pertaining to the Inference Corporation
Employee Stock Purchase Plan of our report dated February 18, 2000, except for
Note 12, as to which the date is March 16, 2000, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Inference Corporation included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended January 31, 2000.

                                   /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Sacramento, California
April 5, 2000
§ 1134.145 Site visits. ( a ) *OMB guidance.* OMB guidance in 2 CFR 200.328(e) states that a Federal awarding agency may make site visits as warranted by program needs.
( b ) *DoD implementation.* A DoD Component's general terms and conditions must state that the Federal Government reserves the right to make site visits as warranted.
( c ) *Award terms and conditions.* A DoD Component's general terms and conditions must include the wording that appendix A to this part provides for Section G of REP Article I concerning site visits.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Chem-bio defense quarterly**
 
Volume
Issues
01
01020304
02
0102
03
01020304
04
01020304
05
01020304
06
01020304
07
0102
08
0102
09
01
 
 
SuDoc Number:D 1.110:
Item Number:0306-A-34 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000563075
 
July 31, 2019
§ 3187.8 Deadline date and method for submitting applications. ( a ) The notice of funding opportunity sets the deadline date and method(s) for applications to be submitted to the Institute.
( b ) If the application notice permits mailing of an application, an applicant must be prepared to show one of the following as proof of timely mailing: ( 1 ) A legibly dated U.S. Postal Service postmark.
( 2 ) A legible mail receipt with the date of mailing stamped by the U.S. Postal Service.
( 3 ) A dated shipping label, invoice, or receipt from a commercial carrier.
( 4 ) Any other dated proof of mailing acceptable to the Director.
( c ) If the application notice permits mailing of an application, and the application is mailed through the U.S. Postal Service, the Director does not accept either of the following as proof of mailing: ( 1 ) A private metered postmark.
( 2 ) A mail receipt that is not date cancelled by the U.S. Postal Service.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Deutsche Mortgage & AssetReceiving Corporation 

60 WALL ST

NEW YORK, New York 10005-2836

 

 

Re: Annual Statement ofCompliance for COMM 2013-LC6 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates

 

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of January 1, 2013 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a) A review of WellsFargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1005 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1005

  To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to permit 
certain summer food pilot programs to be carried out in all States and 
                      by all service institutions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 11, 2005

   Mr. Lugar introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to permit 
certain summer food pilot programs to be carried out in all States and 
                      by all service institutions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds that--
            (1) proper nutrition is a key to childhood health and equal 
        educational opportunities;
            (2) each day, more than 28,000,000 children participate in 
        Federal school meal programs;
            (3) more than \1/2\ of those children receive free or 
        reduced price meals due to low household income;
            (4) in 1969, Congress established the summer food service 
        program because the nutrition needs of low income children do 
        not subside when the school year ends;
            (5) in 1999, Congress introduced a pilot program allowing 
        13 States and Puerto Rico to streamline administrative 
        procedures;
            (6) participation in the summer food service program in the 
        pilot States greatly increased, while average participation in 
        the nonparticipating States decreased;
            (7) in 2005, due to the success of the pilot program, 
        Congress authorized an additional 6 States to participate in 
        the pilot program; and
            (8) increased efforts to meet the summer nutritional needs 
        of all children in the United States should be employed.

SEC. 2. SUMMER FOOD PILOT PROJECTS.

    Section 18(f) of the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act 
(42 U.S.C. 1769(f)) is amended by striking paragraph (1) and inserting 
the following:
            ``(1) Definition of eligible state.--In this subsection, 
        the term `eligible State' has the meaning given the term 
        `State' in section 12(d).''.
                                 <all>
```
ATTACHMENT A

 

DRAWINGS

(Drawings to be added by owner)
#### § 3369.137 Who in the NEH may grant an exception to let an excluded person participate in a covered transaction?

The NEH Chairman has the authority to grant an exception to let an excluded person participate in a covered transaction, as provided in the OMB guidance at 2 CFR 180.135.
ule commemo,
this special relationship,
energy and Moment
i are Conveyeq by the
Dut it in g Polar Mn
"ee-legged traject oe 7 blue which ma

rom . Zz
Once in Earti -Orbit, Atlantis’ ca 10 bi tas
OPENS to reveal the Trac) ing and Data Relay >
fa Satellite Which a i
1M STS-41 crow )

rs in gol €mphasis against —
the white wings of Atlantis and the st,
blacknes, fs} A pri is

Stars on € Patch are arrang
Mission's STS number: f

IN
STS-40 CREW PATCH DESCRIPTIOI
The STS-40 patch is a bold

Manned Flight Awareness
Commemorating
the First Flight of Space Shuttle
April 12-14, 1981

— —~—</
###### Editorial Note on Part 180

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 180 appear at 79 FR 75879, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 180.915 Civil judgment.

*Civil judgment* means the disposition of a civil action by any court of competent jurisdiction, whether by verdict, decision, settlement, stipulation, other disposition which creates a civil liability for the complained of wrongful acts, or a final determination of liability under the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1988 (31 U.S.C. 3801-3812).
###### Editorial Note on Part 118

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 118 appear at 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

#### § 118.3 Definitions.

The definitions and interpretations of terms in section 201 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FFDCA) (21 U.S.C. 321) are applicable to such terms when used in this part, except where they are redefined in this part. The following definitions also apply:

*Biosecurity* means a program, including the limiting of visitors on the farm and in poultry houses, maintaining personnel and equipment practices that will protect against cross contamination from one poultry house to another, preventing stray poultry, wild birds, cats, and other animals from entering poultry houses, and not allowing employees to keep birds at home, to ensure that there is no introduction or transfer of *Salmonella* Enteritidis (SE) onto a farm or among poultry houses.

*Egg products facility* means a USDA-inspected egg products plant where liquid, frozen, and/or dried egg products are produced.

*Farm* means all poultry houses and grounds immediately surrounding the poultry houses covered under a single biosecurity program.

*Flock* means all laying hens within one poultry house.

*Group* means all laying hens of the same age within one poultry house.

*Induced molting* means molting that is artificially initiated.

*Laying cycle* means the period of time that a hen begins to produce eggs until it undergoes induced molting or is permanently taken out of production and the period of time that a hen produces eggs between successive induced molting periods or between induced molting and the time that the hen is permanently taken out of production.

*Molting* means a life stage during which hens stop laying eggs and shed their feathers.

*Pest* means any objectionable animal including, but not limited to, rodents, flies, and larvae.

*Positive flock* means a flock that has had an egg test that was positive for SE. A flock is considered positive until that flock meets the egg testing requirements in § 118.6(c) to return to table egg production.

*Positive poultry house* means a poultry house from which there has been an environmental test that was positive for SE at any time during the life of a group in the poultry house until that house is cleaned and disinfected according to § 118.4(d).

*Poultry house* means a building, other structure, or separate section within a structure used to house poultry. For structures comprising more than one section containing poultry, each section that is separated from the other sections is considered a separate house.

*Producer* means a person who owns and/or operates a poultry house containing laying hens which produce shell eggs for human consumption.

*Shell egg* (or egg) means the egg of the domesticated chicken.

*Shell egg processing facility* means a facility that processes (e.g., washes, grades, packs) shell eggs for the table egg market.

*Treatment* (or treated) means a technology or process that achieves at least a 5-log destruction of SE for shell eggs, or the processing of egg products in accordance with the Egg Products Inspection Act.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 52 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 52

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      January 13, 2017.
    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are hereby, elected to 
the following standing committees of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Agriculture: Ms. Blunt Rochester.
    Committee on the Budget: Ms. Wasserman Schultz, Mr. Brendan F. Boyle of 
Pennsylvania, Mr. Khanna, Ms. Jayapal, and Mr. Carbajal.
    Committee on Foreign Affairs: Mr. Ted Lieu of California.
    Committee on Natural Resources: Ms. Hanabusa, Ms. Barragan, Mr. Soto, Mr. 
Panetta, Mr. McEachin, and Mr. Brown of Maryland.
    Committee on Oversight and Government Reform: Mrs. Demings, Mr. 
Krishnamoorthi, and Mr. Raskin.
    Committee on Science, Space, and Technology: Ms. Rosen.
    Committee on Small Business: Mr. Evans and Mrs. Murphy of Florida.
    Committee on Veterans' Affairs: Mr. Correa.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Editorial Note on Part 25
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 25 appear at 79 FR 75879, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 25.205 Effect of noncompliance with a requirement to obtain a unique entity identifier or register in the SAM. ( a ) A Federal awarding agency may not make a Federal award or financial modification to an existing Federal award to an applicant or recipient until the entity has complied with the requirements described in § 25.200 to provide a valid unique entity identifier and maintain an active SAM registration with current information (other than any requirement that is not applicable because the entity is exempted under § 25.110).
( b ) At the time a Federal awarding agency is ready to make a Federal award, if the intended recipient has not complied with an applicable requirement to provide a unique entity identifier or maintain an active SAM registration with current information, the Federal awarding agency: ( 1 ) May determine that the applicant is not qualified to receive a Federal award; and
( 2 ) May use that determination as a basis for making a Federal award to another applicant.
[85 FR 49523, Aug. 13, 2020]
EXHIBIT 13.(a).(1)





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,





In connection with the Annual Report of Mazor Robotics Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certify that to our knowledge:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: April 3, 2014


/s/ Ori Hadomi

Name: Ori Hadomi

Title: Chief Executive OfficerDate: April 3, 2014/s/ Sharon Levita

Name: Sharon Levita

Title: Chief Financial Officer
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-16-00680-CR

JOE MARION LONGORIA JR.

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the

36th District Court of San Patricio County, Texas

Trial Cause No. S-16-3129CR

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed as modified by 

this Court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

June 28, 2018
#### § 52.141 Referral to the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS).

The Commission shall refer a copy of the application to the ACRS. The ACRS shall report on those portions of the application which concern safety.
#### § 3256.400 What method do I use as an agency awarding official to obtain a recipient's agreement to comply with the OMB guidance?

To obtain a recipient's agreement to comply with applicable requirements in the OMB guidance at 2 CFR part 182, you must include the following term or condition in the award: Drug-free workplace. You as the recipient must comply with drug-free workplace requirements in subpart B (or subpart C, if the recipient is an individual) of this part, which adopts the Governmentwide implementation (2 CFR part 182) of sec. 5152-5158 of the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 (Pub. L. 100-690, Title V, Subtitle D; 41 U.S.C. 701-707).
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear at 68 FR 24879, May 9, 2003, and at 88 FR 45064, July 14, 2023.

§ 10.90 Food and Drug Administration regulations, recommendations, and agreements. ( a ) *Regulations.* FDA regulations are issued in the Federal Register under § 10.40 or § 10.50 and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations. Regulations may contain provisions that will be enforced as legal requirements, or which are intended only as guidance documents and recommendations, or both. The dissemination of draft notices and regulations is subject to § 10.80.
( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) *Recommendations.* In addition to the guidance documents subject to § 10.115, FDA often formulates and disseminates recommendations about matters which are authorized by, but do not involve direct regulatory action under, the laws administered by the Commissioner, e.g., model State and local ordinances, or personnel practices for reducing radiation exposure, issued under 42 U.S.C. 243 and 21 U.S.C. 360ii. These recommendations may, in the discretion of the Commissioner, be handled under the procedures established in § 10.115, except that the recommendations will be included in a separate public file of recommendations established by the Dockets Management Staff and will be separated from the guidance documents in the notice of availability published in the Federal Register, or be published in the Federal Register as regulations under paragraph (a) of this section.
( d ) *Agreements.* Formal agreements, memoranda of understanding, or other similar written documents executed by FDA and another person will be included in the public file on agreements established by the Division of Freedom of Information (ELEM-1029)” and adding in its place “(the Freedom of Information Staff's address is available on the agency's web site at *http://www.fda.gov*) under § 20.108. A document not included in the public file is deemed to be rescinded and has no force or effect whatever.
[44 FR 22323, Apr. 13, 1979, as amended at 54 FR 9035, Mar. 3, 1989; 65 FR 56477, Sept. 19, 2000; 75 FR 16346, Apr. 1, 2010; 79 FR 68114, Nov. 14, 2014]