alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 249 (Wednesday, December 29, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 82003]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32813]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Portsmouth

AGENCY: Department of Energy (DOE).

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Environmental 
Management Site-Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB), Portsmouth. The 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) requires 
that public notice of this meeting be announced in the Federal 
Register. This notice is being published less than 15 days from the 
date of the meeting due to programmatic issues.

DATES: Thursday, January 6, 2011; 6 p.m.-8 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Ohio State University, Endeavor Center, 1862 Shyville Road, 
Piketon, Ohio 45661.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joel Bradburne, Deputy Designated 
Federal Officer, Department of Energy Portsmouth/Paducah Project 
Office, Post Office Box 700, Piketon, Ohio 45661, (740) 897-3822, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7c36131910523e0e1d181e090e12193c10190452181319521b130a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b8f2d7ddd496facad9dcdacdcad6ddf8d4ddc096dcd7dd96dfd7ce">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Purpose of the Board: The purpose of the Board is to make 
recommendations to DOE-EM and site management in the areas of 
environmental restoration, waste management and related activities.
    Tentative Agenda:
    <bullet> Call to Order, Introductions, Review of Agenda.
    <bullet> Approval of November Minutes.
    <bullet> Deputy Designated Federal Officer's Comments.
    <bullet> Federal Coordinator's Comments.
    <bullet> Liaisons' Comments.
    <bullet> Administrative Issues:
    [cir] Subcommittee Updates.
    [cir] Recommendation on Speaker's Bureau Presentation.
    <bullet> Public Comments.
    <bullet> Final Comments.
    <bullet> Adjourn.
    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. The EM 
SSAB, Portsmouth, welcomes the attendance of the public at its advisory 
committee meetings and will make every effort to accommodate persons 
with physical disabilities or special needs. If you require special 
accommodations due to a disability, please contact Joel Bradburne in 
advance of the meeting at the phone number listed above. The Deputy 
Designated Federal Officer is empowered to conduct the meeting in a 
fashion that will facilitate the orderly conduct of business.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on December 22, 2010.
LaTanya Butler,
Acting Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-32813 Filed 12-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 820.40 Purpose and scope.

This subpart provides for the issuance of Compliance Orders to prevent, rectify or penalize violations of the Act, a Nuclear Statute, or a DOE Nuclear Safety Requirement and to require action consistent with the Act, a Nuclear Statute, or a DOE Nuclear Safety Requirement.
§ 3187.2 Applicable regulations and scope of this part. ( a ) Except as set forth in this 2 CFR part 3187, the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards set forth in 2 CFR part 200 shall apply to awards from funds appropriated to the Institute of Museum and Library Services (the “Institute” or “IMLS”).
( b ) The IMLS authorizing statutes, including 20 U.S.C. 9101 *et seq.* and 20 U.S.C. 80r-5, (“IMLS Statutes”) are controlling in the event of any conflict between the IMLS Statutes and the regulations in 2 CFR part 200.
#### § 376.370 What are the obligations of Medicare carriers and intermediaries?

Because Medicare carriers, intermediaries and other Medicare contractors undertake responsibilities on behalf of the Medicare program (Title XVIII of the Social Security Act), these entities assume the same obligations and responsibilities as the HHS Medicare officials responsible for the Medicare Program with respect to actions under 2 CFR part 376. This would include the requirement for these entities to check the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS) and take necessary steps to effect this part.
# EUR-Lex - 31992D0429 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31992D0429

**92/429/EEC: Commission Decision of 24 June 1992 amending Decision 83/471/EEC on the Community Inspection Committee on application of the classification scale for carcases of adult bovine animals **

*
Official Journal L 237 , 20/08/1992 P. 0015 - 0015 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 44 P. 0171 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 44 P. 0171 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 24 June 1992 amending Decision 83/471/EEC on the Community Inspection Committee on application of the classification scale for carcases of adult bovine animals (92/429/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1208/81 of 28 April 1981 determining the Community scale for the classification of carcases of adult bovine animals (1), as amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1026/91 (2), and in particular the fourth paragraph of Article 5 thereof,

Whereas the composition of the Inspection Committee must within a two year period allow each Member State to be represented on all the visits made throughout the Member States; whereas to this end it is necessary to increase the number of participant members in the Committee; whereas Commission Decision 83/471/EEC of 7 September 1983 relating to the Community Inspection Committee for application of the classification scale for carcases ad adult bovine animals (3), as last amended by Decision 86/131/EEC (4), should be amended accordingly;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Beef and Veal,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Article 2 (2) of Decision 83/471/EEC is hereby replaced by the following:

'2. On-the-spot Inspections shall be carried out in a given Member State by a delegation of the Committee of a maximum of 10 members as follows:

- three Commission experts, one of whom shall act as chairman of the Committee,

- one expert from the Member State in question,

- one expert from the Member State in which the Committee made its last on-the-spot inspection,

- one expert from a Member State in which the Committee will be making an inspection in the near future,

- four experts from other Member States.'

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States. Done at Brussels, 24 June 1992. For the Commission

Ray MAC SHARRY

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 123, 7. 5. 1981, p. 3. (2) OJ No L 106, 26. 4. 1991, p. 2. (3) OJ No L 259, 20. 9. 1983, p. 30. (4) OJ No L 101, 17. 4. 1986, p. 40.
#### § 1.330 Can existing records satisfy the requirements of this subpart?

The regulations in this subpart do not require duplication of existing records if those records contain all of the information required by this subpart. If a covered person keeps records of all of the information as required by this subpart to comply with other Federal, State, or local regulations, or for any other reason, then those records may be used to meet these requirements. Moreover, persons do not have to keep all of the information required by this rule in one set of records. If they have records containing some of the required information, they may keep those existing records and keep, either separately or in a combined form, any new information required by this rule. There is no obligation to create an entirely new record or compilation of records containing both existing and new information, even if the records containing some of the required information were not created at the time the food was received or released.
§ 52.31 Criteria for renewal. ( a ) The Commission shall grant the renewal only if it determines that: ( 1 ) The site complies with the Act, the Commission's regulations, and orders applicable and in effect at the time the site permit was originally issued; and
( 2 ) Any new requirements the Commission may wish to impose are: ( i ) Necessary for adequate protection to public health and safety or common defense and security;
( ii ) Necessary for compliance with the Commission's regulations, and orders applicable and in effect at the time the site permit was originally issued; or
( iii ) A substantial increase in overall protection of the public health and safety or the common defense and security to be derived from the new requirements, and the direct and indirect costs of implementation of those requirements are justified in view of this increased protection.
( b ) A denial of renewal under the provisions of § 52.31(a) does not bar the permit holder or another applicant from filing a new application for the site which proposes changes to the site or the way that it is used to correct the deficiencies cited in the denial of the renewal.
[89 FR 57720, July 16, 2024]
#### § 1402.205 [Reserved]
Exhibit 35.1



|     |  |  |                                                          |                         
|---- |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------
|LOGO |  |  |                                                          | Corporate Trust Services
|     |  |  | MAC R1204-010 9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
|     |  |  | Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715
2380                     

Citibank, N.A.

388 Greenwich
Street

14th Floor

New York, New York 10013

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2013-4 Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2013-4

Per the Amended and Restated Pooling and Servicing dated as of January 1, 2014 (the Agreement), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Master Servicer (Wells Fargo), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2014 (the Reporting Period):



| | (a) | A review of Wells Fargos activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officers supervision; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | To the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

February 24, 2015



|                  
|------------------
|/s/ Kristen Cronin
|Kristen Cronin    
|Vice President    



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
Exhibit 35.2

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2013-2 for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2016 (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer International Puerto Rico LLC (the Subservicer), does hereby certify and represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Subservicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of March 13, 2013, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2013-2 and U.S. Bank National Association (the Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Subservicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER INTERNATIONAL PUERTO RICO LLCBy:

/s/ Troy MillerName:

Troy MillerTitle:

PresidentDate:

March 30, 2017
###### Editorial Note on Part 180

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 180 appear at 79 FR 75879, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 180.320 Must I verify that principals of my covered transactions are eligible to participate?

Yes, you as a participant are responsible for determining whether any of your principals of your covered transactions is excluded or disqualified from participating in the transaction.

You may decide the method and frequency by which you do so. You may, but you are not required to, check SAM Exclusions.
228 So.2d 482

#### J. C. TRAHAN DRILLING, CONTRACTOR, INC. v. E. COCKRELL, Jr.

No. 50146.

Dec. 11, 1969.

In re: J. C. Trahan, Drilling Contractor, Inc. applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of St. Mary. 225 So.2d 599.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal we find no error of law in its judgment. • • '''
§ 1.205 Applicability to grants and other funding instruments. The types of instruments that are subject to the guidance in this subtitle vary from one portion of the guidance to another (note that each part identifies the types of instruments to which it applies). All portions of the guidance apply to grants and cooperative agreements, some portions also apply to other types of financial assistance or nonprocurement instruments, and some portions also apply to procurement contracts. For example, the: ( a ) Guidance on debarment and suspension in part 180 of this subtitle applies broadly to all financial assistance and other nonprocurement transactions, and not just to grants and cooperative agreements.
( b ) Cost principles in parts 220, 225 and 230 of this subtitle apply to procurement contracts, as well as to financial assistance, although those principles are implemented for procurement contracts through the Federal Acquisition Regulation in title 48 of the CFR, rather than through Federal agency regulations on grants and agreements in this title.
[70 FR 51863, Aug. 31, 2005]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-40125

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

VICTOR MANUEL LONGORIA-HERNANDEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:14-CR-709-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Victor Manuel Longoria-Hernandez pled guilty to being an alien found 

unlawfully in the United States after deportation. Based on a total offense 

level of ten and a criminal history category IV, his advisory guidelines range 

of imprisonment was 15 to 21 months. The district court sentenced him to 21 

months of imprisonment.

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 8, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-40125 Document: 00513183553 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/08/2015
No. 15-40125

2

On appeal, Longoria-Hernandez argues that the district court erred in 

assessing a criminal history point for his 2012 public intoxication conviction. 

He concedes that, because he failed to object to the criminal history point in 

the district court, this issue is reviewed only for plain error. To establish plain 

error, Longoria-Hernandez must show a forfeited error that is clear or obvious 

and that affected his substantial rights. Puckett v. United States, 556 U.S. 129, 

135 (2009). The Government concedes that the addition of the criminal history 

point was clearly erroneous.

Longoria-Hernandez’s pre-sentence report listed prior offenses that 

should have been totaled as eight criminal history points. The report, though,

stated there were only seven. Seven criminal history points placed the 

defendant in criminal history category IV. Longoria-Hernandez recognizes in 

his reply brief that there were actually eight criminal history points. The 

erroneous addition of a point for his 2012 public intoxication does not affect his 

criminal history category because, despite that error, he still properly has 

seven points.

A sentencing error affects a defendant’s substantial rights where there 

is a reasonable probability that the defendant would have received a more 

lenient sentence absent the error. United States v. Mudekunye, 646 F.3d 281, 

289 (5th Cir. 2011). Longoria-Hernandez has not shown that reasonable 

probability. AFFIRMED.

 Case: 15-40125 Document: 00513183553 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/08/2015
No. 17,240.

#### Gold, Trustee, et al. *v.*State, ex rel. Adam.

Filed March 22, 1895;

petition for rehearing overruled December 11, 1895.

From the Marion Superior Court.

*Ayres & Jones*and *U. G. Allen, for*appellants.

*G. A. Dryer,*for appellee.

Howard, J.

This case involves the construction of the same statutes and the decision of the same questions passed upon in the consideration of the case of *Taggart, Auditor,*v. *State, ex rel. Williams,*142 Ind. 668.

On the authority of that case, the judgment in this case is also reversed, with instructions to sustain the appellant’s demurrers to-the alternative -writ of mandate, with leave to amend the pleading's or to file new pleadings, and for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion or with the opinion in said case of *Taggart, Auditor,*v. *State, ex rel. Williams.*
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk October 26, 2009

d1019 

# Order

October 26, 2009

138202(25)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138202 COA: 287595 St. Clair CC: 05-001460-FH; 05-002669-FC ALBERT MARQUE-ELLIS DENNIS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for re consideration of this Court’s August 6, 2009 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does notappear that the order was entered erroneously.
#### § 200.316 Property trust relationship.

Real property, equipment, and intangible property, that are acquired or improved with a Federal award must be held in trust by the non-Federal entity as trustee for the beneficiaries of the project or program under which the property was acquired or improved. The Federal awarding agency may require the non-Federal entity to record liens or other appropriate notices of record to indicate that personal or real property has been acquired or improved with a Federal award and that use and disposition conditions apply to the property.
Editorial Note on Part 180
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 180 appear at 79 FR 75879, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 180.645 Do other Federal agencies know if an agency agrees to a voluntary exclusion? ( a ) Yes, the Federal agency agreeing to the voluntary exclusion enters information about it into SAM Exclusions.
( b ) Also, any agency or person may contact the Federal agency that agreed to the voluntary exclusion to find out the details of the voluntary exclusion.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FISCAL QUARTER ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE FISCAL QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 30, 1995.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           2,176
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,670
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     36,536
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                73,797
<PP&E>                                          15,355
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  89,152
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,175
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                    15,814,265
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    89,152
<SALES>                                         32,698
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                32,698
<CGS>                                           32,329
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   32,329
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,667
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (853)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,732)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,010)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,722)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,722)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.043)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>