alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Henry Hawkins, Petitioner, v. Paul C. Agnew, as Director of Dannemora State Hospital, Respondent.

Application, pursuant to CPLR 7002 (subd. [b], par. 2), for a writ of habeas corpus denied for failure of compliance with article 70 of the CPLR, and more particularly with the provisions of CPLR 7002 (subd. [c], pars. 1, 6) thereof, and as otherwise insufficient on its face. Herlihy, P. J., Reynolds, Greenblott, Cooke and Sweeney, JJ., concur.
#### § 3373.300 Whom in the NEH does a recipient who is an individual notify about a criminal drug conviction?

A recipient who is an individual and is required under 2 CFR 182.300(b) to notify Federal agencies about a conviction for a criminal drug offense must notify the Director, Office of Grant Management, NEH.
(logo)**Deutsche Bank**

1761East St. Andrew Place

SantaAna, CA 92705-4934

 

Tel714 247 6000

Fax714 247 6009 

 

 

ANNUALSTATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

 

COMM2013-CCRE6

 

Theundersigned, David Co, a Director of Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, asthe Certificate Administrator (a "Certifying Servicer'') under the Poolingand Servicing Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2013 (the "Agreement"),by and among,Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, asDepositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, WellsFargo Bank, National Association, asSpecial Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Deutsche BankTrust Company Americas, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent andCustodian, and Park Bridge Lender ServicesLLC,asOperatingAdvisor,herebycertifiesinaccordancewithSection10.11oftheAgreement:

 

A)   A review of such Certifying Servicer's activities from January 1, 2017 toDecember 31, 2017 (the "reporting period") and of such CertifyingServicer's performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer'ssupervision and

B)   That, as to the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, suchCertifying Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement, inall material respects throughout the reporting period.

 

DEUTSCHEBANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS

asCertificate Administrator

 

 

/s/David Co

BY:David Co

Title:Director

Date:March 1, 2018
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002)

 

Inconnection with the filing by Hospitality Properties Trust (the “Company”) ofthe Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the“Report”), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of hisknowledge:

 

1.                                       The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,and

 

2.                                       The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  Barry M. Portnoy |                 | /s/  John G. Murray   |   |
|-----------------------|----------------------|-----------------------|--------|
| Barry  M. Portnoy     | John  G. Murray      |
| Managing  Trustee     | President  and Chief |
|                  | Operating  Officer   |
|                  |                 |
|                  |                 |
| /s/  Gerard M. Martin |                 | /s/  Mark L. Kleifges |   |
| Gerard  M. Martin     | Mark  L. Kleifges    |
| Managing  Trustee     | Treasurer  and Chief |
|                  | Financial  Officer   |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 989 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 989

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    September 26, 2006.
Whereas on August 10, 2006, British police arrested 24 people for plotting to 
        commit acts of terror on trans-Atlantic flights;
Whereas as of August 31, 2006, 12 citizens have been charged for their roles in 
        the terror plot, including eight citizens charged with conspiracy to 
        murder;
Whereas United Kingdom authorities acted swiftly and decisively to prevent a 
        horrific attack on scores of innocent people;
Whereas the United Kingdom and the United States have been close allies in not 
        only two World Wars and Operation Desert Storm, but also the Global War 
        on Terror;
Whereas the intelligence and military communities of the United Kingdom and the 
        United States continue to work together to win the Global War on Terror;
Whereas the threat of terrorism is a grave concern for all nations, regardless 
        of geographical or other boundaries;
Whereas acts of terror have profoundly affected citizens across the globe, 
        including those in Egypt, India, Indonesia, Jordan, Spain, Turkey, the 
        United Kingdom, and the United States; and
Whereas victory in the Global War on Terror is a necessity to ensure the liberty 
        and safety of all people: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives--
            (1) commends the law enforcement authorities of the United Kingdom 
        on their action to prevent a terrible attack from occurring;
            (2) commends the intelligence community of the United Kingdom for 
        its outstanding work in identifying the citizens seeking to carry out 
        this plot;
            (3) condemns those that would use acts of violence against innocent 
        civilians to spread a message of hate and intolerance; and
            (4) urges the allies of the United States in the Global War on 
        Terror to remain steadfast in the execution of this important mission.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Editorial Note on Part 101
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 101 appear at 63 FR 14035, Mar. 24, 1998, 66 FR 17358, Mar. 30, 2001, 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001, and 81 FR 49895, July 29, 2016.

§ 101.71 Health claims: claims not authorized. Health claims not authorized for foods in conventional food form or for dietary supplements of vitamins, minerals, herbs, or other similar substances: ( a ) Dietary fiber and cardiovascular disease.
( b ) Zinc and immune function in the elderly.
[58 FR 2534, Jan. 6, 1993, as amended at 58 FR 2548, 2578, 2620, 2639, 2664, 2714, Jan. 6, 1993; 58 FR 17100, Apr. 1, 1993; 59 FR 437, Jan. 4, 1994; 65 FR 58918, Oct. 3, 2000]
#### BOUYON v. DOULEN et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

February 26, 1915.)

Action by Eliza A. Bouyon against James Doulen and others.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
§ 800.200 Maximum loan; allowable costs. ( a ) A loan under this regulation shall not exceed 75 percent of allowable costs of a bid or proposal to obtain a DOE contract or other agreement (such as a procurement contract, cooperative agreement, grant, loan or loan guarantee), or a subcontract with a DOE operating contractor, or a contract with a first-tier subcontractor of a DOE operating contractor in furtherance of the research, development, demonstration or other contract activities of DOE.
( b ) To be allowable, costs must, in DOE's judgment: ( 1 ) Be consistent with the bidding cost principles of the Federal Procurement Regulation (41 CFR Ch. 1, 1-15.205-3) and DOE Procurement Regulation (41 CFR Ch. 9, 9-15.205-3); and;
( 2 ) Be necessary, reasonable and customary for the bid or proposal contemplated by the application; and
( 3 ) Be incurred, or expected to be incurred, by the applicant.
( c ) Costs which are, in general, allowable, if consistent with paragraph (b) of this section include, but are not limited to: ( 1 ) Bid bond premiums.
( 2 ) Financial, accounting, legal, engineering and other professional, consulting or similar fees and service charges.
( 3 ) Printing and reproduction costs.
( 4 ) Travel and transportation costs.
( 5 ) Costs of the loan application under this rule.
( d ) Costs that are not considered as allowable costs include the following: ( 1 ) Fees and commissions charged to the applicant, including finder's fees, for obtaining Federal funds.
( 2 ) Expenses, which, in DOE's judgment, have primarily an application broader than the specific loan request.
( 3 ) Costs which, in DOE's judgment, fail to conform to paragraph (b) of this section.
[46 FR 44689, Sept. 4, 1981, as amended at 48 FR 17574, Apr. 25, 1983]
#### § 1128.500 Purpose of FMS Article V.

FMS Article V of the general terms and conditions specifies requirements related to audits required under the Single Audit Act, as amended (31 U.S.C., chapter 75). The article thereby implements for grants and cooperative agreements the OMB guidance in Subpart F of 2 CFR part 200.
Order entered April 15, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01014-CV

ADA RENEE LAWRENCE, INDIVIDUALLY, ET AL., Appellants

V.

STEWART CREEK VILLAS LP, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 199-04308-2016

ORDER

Before the Court is appellants’ April 13, 2020 motion for an extension of 

time to file a response to appellees’ joint motion to dismiss the appeal and 

appellees’ response to the motion. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to 

May 15, 2020.

In their response to the motion, appellees request an extension of time to file 

their respective briefs on the merits. We GRANT the request and extend the time 

to June 15, 2020.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG 

JUSTICE
#### John B. WELLS, petitioner, v. Herschel W. GOBER, Acting Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

No. 97-385.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Jan. 12, 1998.

Case below, *Wells v. Brown,*9 Vet.App. 293; 114 F.3d 1207.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

I, Daniel Vinson, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reportson Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the UBS-Barclays Commercial MortgageTrust 2013-C6 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports,taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicingand other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the ExchangeAct periodic reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statementsrequired in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicershave fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicingcriteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteriafor asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange ActRules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any materialinstances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably reliedon information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

 

Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, NationalAssociation, as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee,Certificate Administrator and Custodian, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor, Midland Loan Services, a Divisionof PNC Bank, National Association, as Primary Servicer for the Santa Anita Mall Mortgage Loan, Midland Loan Services, a Divisionof PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer for the Santa Anita Mall Mortgage Loan, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas,as Trustee,Certificate Administrator and Custodian for the Santa Anita Mall Mortgage Loan, and Situs Holdings, LLC, as OperatingAdvisor for the Santa Anita Mall Mortgage Loan.

 

Dated: November 5, 2019

 

/s/ Daniel Vinson

 

Chief Executive Officer

(senior officer in charge of securitizationof the depositor)
#### Pamela Oles, Respondent, v Michael Oles, Appellant.

In a matrimonial action, defendant appeals from so much of a judgment of divorce of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated January 22, 1980, as (1) awarded plaintiff (a) alimony of $100 per week and (b) the sum of $5,800 as arrears due pursuant to an order of the same court dated November 16, 1977, which awarded plaintiff temporary alimony, and (2) awarded plaintiff’s counsel a fee in the sum of $2,500. Judgment modified, on the law and the facts, by adding thereto a provision that the payments of alimony to be made by defendant shall cease one year after the date of their commencement. As so modified, judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. We find that, under the circumstances of this case, plaintiff is on the verge of being self-supporting, but has not yet attained that status. In our discretion and with due regard to the relevant factors to be considered, we conclude that "justice requires” that the alimony award be modified as indicated. (See Domestic Relations Law, § 236; cf. *Tumolillo v Tumolillo,*51 NY2d 709.) We find no merit in the remaining contentions of defendant. It is noted that the issue of whether the order of November 16, 1977, directing defendant to pay temporary alimony in the sum of $50 per week, was properly made is not before us on this appeal (see *Caplin v Caplin,*33 AD2d 908). Hopkins, J. P., Titone, Margett and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
(June 22, 1970)

#### In the Matter of the Application for John R. Freeman for Admission to the Bar.

Motion by applicant for reargument and reconsideration of his prior application for admission to the Bar of the State of New York *994which was previously denied by order of this court dated December 22, 1969. Motion denied. Christ, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Latham and Brennan, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the annual report of SBH ASSOCIATES, INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mary Merritt, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: April 27, 2015 By: /s/ MARY MERRITT Mary Merritt Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer  1
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 875 

Congratulating Spelman College on the occasion of its 125th anniversary. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 16, 2006 

Mr. LEWIS of Georgia (for himself, Mr. KINGSTON, Mr. BISHOP of Georgia, 

Mr. PAYNE, Mr. SCOTT of Georgia, Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas, Mr. 

MARSHALL, Mr. NORWOOD, Ms. MILLENDER-MCDONALD, Mr. GINGREY, 

Ms. GINNY BROWN-WAITE of Florida, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, and Ms. EDDIE

BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas) submitted the following resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating Spelman College on the occasion of its 125th 

anniversary. 

Whereas Spelman College was established by Sophia B. Packard and Harriet E. Giles, school teachers and Baptist 

missionaries, in 1881 in Atlanta, Georgia, for the purpose of educating African American women and girls; 

Whereas as a result of the benevolence of John D. Rockefeller, Sr. and Laura Spelman Rockefeller, the name of 

the institution was changed from ‘‘Atlanta Baptist Female Seminary’’ to ‘‘Spelman Seminary’’ in honor of the 

Spelman family; 

Whereas the curriculum expanded to include high school and 

college classes, and the seminary conferred its first high 
2 

•HRES 875 IH

school diplomas in 1887, and its first college degrees in 

1901; 

Whereas in 1924, Spelman Seminary officially became 

Spelman College and grew to become a leading undergraduate institution for African American women; 

Whereas Spelman College was ranked among the top 75 Best 

Liberal Arts Colleges according to U.S. News & World 

Report, 2005 edition; 

Whereas the Association of Medical Colleges ranks Spelman 

College fifth among undergraduate programs for Black 

students accepted to medical school, and Spelman is one 

of six institutions designated by the National Science 

Foundation and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration as a Model Institution for Excellence in undergraduate science and math education; 

Whereas Spelman’s ninth President, Beverly Daniel Tatum, 

has initiated a strategic plan for Spelman (‘‘Spelman 

ALIVE’’) that includes five goals: Academic excellence, 

Leadership development, Improving the infrastructure, 

Visibility of accomplishments of the campus community, 

and Exemplary customer service, all designed to create a 

vision for Spelman of ‘‘Nothing Less than the Best’’; and 

Whereas Spelman College has prepared more than six generations of African American women to reach the highest 

levels of academic, community, and professional achievement: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) congratulates Spelman College on the occa3 sion of its 125th anniversary; and 
3 

•HRES 875 IH

1 (2) commends the President of Spelman Col2 lege, Dr. Beverly Daniel Tatum, and the administra3 tion, faculty, staff, students, and alumnae of the 

4 College for their outstanding achievements, and con5 tribution to African American education, history, 

6 and culture. 

Æ
Exhibit 23.1


Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-206514) of Hospitality Properties Trust and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-191096) pertaining to the 2012 Equity Compensation Plan of Hospitality Properties Trust of our reports dated March 1, 2018 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Hospitality Properties Trust and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Hospitality Properties Trust included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Hospitality Properties Trust for the year ended December 31, 2017.


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP





Boston, Massachusetts


March 1, 2018
§ 2424.300 What must I do before I enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier (HUD supplement to governmentwide definition at 2 CFR 180.300)? ( a ) You, as a participant, are responsible for determining whether you are entering into a covered transaction with an excluded or disqualified person. You may decide the method by which you do so. ( 1 ) You may, but are not required to, check the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS).
( 2 ) You may, but are not required to, collect a certification from that person.
( b ) In the case of an employment contract, HUD does not require employers to check the EPLS prior to making salary payments pursuant to that contract.
Editorial Note on Part 34
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 34 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 34.46 Supervision of radiographers' assistants. Whenever a radiographer's assistant uses radiographic exposure devices, associated equipment or sealed sources or conducts radiation surveys required by § 34.49(b) to determine that the sealed source has returned to the shielded position after an exposure, the assistant shall be under the personal supervision of a radiographer. The personal supervision must include: ( a ) The radiographer's physical presence at the site where the sealed sources are being used;
( b ) The availability of the radiographer to give immediate assistance if required; and
( c ) The radiographer's direct observation of the assistant's performance of the operations referred to in this section.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 249 (Wednesday, December 29, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 82073]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32855]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to Sec.  1301.33(a), Title 21 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on November 3, 2010, Siegfried 
(USA), 33 Industrial Park Road, Pennsville, New Jersey 08070, made 
application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to 
be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled 
substances listed in schedules I and II:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gamma Hydroxybutyric Acid (2010)...........  I
Dihydromorphine (9145).....................  I
Amphetamine (1100).........................  II
Methylphenidate (1724).....................  II
Amobarbital (2125).........................  II
Pentobarbital (2270).......................  II
Secobarbital (2315)........................  II
Glutethimide (2550)........................  II
Codeine (9050).............................  II
Oxycodone (9143)...........................  II
Hydromorphone (9150).......................  II
Hydrocodone (9193).........................  II
Methadone (9250)...........................  II
Methadone intermediate (9254)..............  II
Dextropropoxyphene, bulk (non-dosage forms)  II
 (9273).
Morphine (9300)............................  II
Oxymorphone (9652).........................  II
Oxycodone (9143)...........................  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances 
in bulk for distribution to its customers.
    Any other such applicant, and any person who is presently 
registered with DEA to manufacture such substances, may file comments 
or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 
21 CFR 1301.33(a).
    Any such written comments or objections should be addressed, in 
quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of 
Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), 8701 
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and must be filed no 
later than February 28, 2011.

    Dated: December 20, 2010.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-32855 Filed 12-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P