51152 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 163 / Monday, August 24, 2015 / Proposed Rules 

approve Missouri’s SIP revision because 

it meets the requirements of the CAA 

and the CSAPR requirements to replace 

EPA’s allowance allocations for the 

2016 control periods. This action is 

being proposed pursuant to the CAA 

and its implementing regulations. EPA’s 

allocations of CSAPR trading program 

allowances for Missouri for control 

periods in 2017 and beyond remain in 

place until the State submits and EPA 

approves state-determined allocations 

for those control periods through 

another SIP revision. The CSAPR FIPs 

for Missouri remain in place until such 

time as the State decides to replace the 

FIPs with a SIP revision. 

DATES: Comments on this proposed 

action must be received in writing by 

September 23, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07– 

OAR–2015–0556, by mail to Lachala 

Kemp, Environmental Protection 

Agency, Air Planning and Development 

Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard, 

Lenexa, Kansas 66219. Comments may 

also be submitted electronically or 

through hand delivery/courier by 

following the detailed instructions in 

the ADDRESSES section of the direct final 

rule located in the rules section of this 

Federal Register. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Lachala Kemp, Environmental 

Protection Agency, Air Planning and 

Development Branch, 11201 Renner 

Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at 

(913) 551–7214 or by email at 

kemp.lachala@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the 

final rules section of this Federal 

Register, EPA is approving the state’s 

SIP revision as a direct final rule 

without prior proposal because the 

Agency views this as a noncontroversial 

revision amendment and anticipates no 

relevant adverse comments to this 

action. A detailed rationale for the 

approval is set forth in the direct final 

rule. If no relevant adverse comments 

are received in response to this action, 

no further activity is contemplated in 

relation to this action. If EPA receives 

relevant adverse comments, the direct 

final rule will be withdrawn and all 

public comments received will be 

addressed in a subsequent final rule 

based on this proposed action. EPA will 

not institute a second comment period 

on this action. Any parties interested in 

commenting on this action should do so 

at this time. Please note that if EPA 

receives adverse comment on part of 

this rule and if that part can be severed 

from the remainder of the rule, EPA may 

adopt as final those parts of the rule that 

are not the subject of an adverse 

comment. For additional information, 

see the direct final rule which is located 

in the rules section of this Federal 

Register. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate 

matter, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Sulfur dioxides. 

Dated: August 12, 2015. 

Mark Hague, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 7. 

[FR Doc. 2015–20773 Filed 8–21–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R08–OAR–2014–0916; FRL–9932–89– 

Region 8] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; South 

Dakota; Revisions to South Dakota 

Administrative Code; Correction 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule; correction. 

SUMMARY: This document contains a 

correction to the proposed rulemaking, 

which was published on July 14, 2015. 

The proposal contained an error that is 

identified and corrected in this action. 

DATES: This document is effective 

August 24, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Adam Clark, Air Program, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 8, Mailcode 8P–AR, 1595 

Wynkoop, Denver, Colorado 80202– 

1129, (303) 312–7104, clark.adam@

epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

In a proposed rule published July 14, 

2015 (80 FR 40952), EPA proposed to 

approve updates to Administrative 

Rules of South Dakota (ARSD) into the 

South Dakota State Implementation Plan 

(SIP). Among the updates EPA proposed 

to approve was Article 74:36:05, 

‘‘Operating Permits for Part 70 Sources’’ 

which details South Dakota’s Clean Air 

Act Title V program. Clean Air Act Title 

V requirements are not subject to 

Section 110 of the Clean Air Act and are 

thus not required to be incorporated 

into SIPs. Therefore, EPA is issuing this 

correction document to remove the 

proposed approval of ARSD 74:36:05 

from our July 14, 2015 action. EPA is 

instead proposing not to take action on 

South Dakota’s updates to this 

provision. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 

Incorporation by Reference, 

Intergovernmental relations, Lead, 

Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate 

matter, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Dated: August 10, 2015. 

Debra H. Thomas, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 8. 

[FR Doc. 2015–20740 Filed 8–21–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R05–OAR–2015–0408; EPA–R05– 

OAR–2015–0409; FRL–9932–62–Region 5] 

Air Plan Approval; IL; MN; 

Determinations of Attainment of the 

2008 Lead Standard for Chicago and 

Eagan 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to make 

determinations under the Clean Air Act 

(CAA) that the Chicago, Illinois and 

Eagan, Minnesota nonattainment areas 

(hereafter also referred to, respectively, 

as the ‘‘Chicago area,’’ ‘‘Eagan area,’’ or 

‘‘areas’’) have attained the 2008 lead 

(Pb) national ambient air quality 

standard (NAAQS or standard). These 

determinations of attainment are based 

upon complete, quality-assured, and 

certified ambient air monitoring data for 

the 2012–2014 design period showing 

that the areas have achieved attainment 

of the 2008 Pb NAAQS. Additionally, as 

a result of these determinations, EPA 

proposes to suspend the requirements 

for the areas to submit attainment 

demonstrations, and associated 

reasonably available control measures 

(RACM), reasonable further progress 

(RFP) plans, contingency measures for 

failure to meet RFP, and attainment 

deadlines, for as long as the areas 

continue to attain the 2008 Pb NAAQS. 

In this action EPA is not proposing a 

redesignation of the areas to attainment 

of the 2008 Pb NAAQS; the areas remain 

designated nonattainment until such 


rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS