alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 31992D0252 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31992D0252

**92/252/EEC: Decision of the European Parliament of 8 April 1992 granting discharge to the Commission in respect of the financial management of the fifth European Development Fund for the 1990 financial year **

*
Official Journal L 127 , 13/05/1992 P. 0025 - 0025 *

DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT of 8 April 1992 granting discharge to the Commission in respect of the financial management of the fifth European Development Fund for the 1990 financial year (92/252/EEC)

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,

- having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

- having regard to the first ACP-EEC Lomé Convention (1),

- having regard to the balance sheets and administrative accounts of the fourth, fifth and sixth European Development Funds for the 1990 financial year [COM (91) 0132],

- having regard to the report of the Court of Auditors for the 1990 financial year, and the replies of the institutions (2),

- having regard to the recommendation of the Council of 16 March 1992 concerning the granting of this discharge (C3-0115/92),

- whereas the Treaty of 22 July 1975 empowers the European Parliament to grant discharge in respect of the financial management of the Community,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinion of the Committee on Development and Cooperation (A3-0113/92),

1. Grants discharge to the Commission in respect of the financial management of the fifth European Development Fund for the 1990 financial year on the basis of the following amounts:

revenue: ECU 12 427 000

payments: ECU 193 957 000

2. Records its observations in the resolution which forms part of this decision;

3. Instructs its President to forward this decision and the resolution containing its observations to the Commission, the Council, the Court of Auditors and the European Investment Bank and to have them published in the Official Journal of the European Communities (L series). Done at Strasbourg, 8 April 1992.

The Secretary-General The President Enrico VINCI Dr Egon KLEPSCH

(1) OJ No L 25, 30. 1. 1976. (2) OJ No C 324, 13. 12. 1991.
#### § 2700.1010 Suspending official (SBA supplement to government-wide definition at 2 CFR 180.1010).

For SBA, the suspending official for financial assistance programs is the Director of the Office of Credit Risk Management; for all other programs, the suspending official is the Associate General Counsel for Procurement Law.

[72 FR 39728, July 20, 2007, as amended at 73 FR 43348, July 25, 2008]
#### § 1.654 When must an accredited third-party certification body monitor an eligible entity that it has issued a food or facility certification?

If an accredited third-party certification body has reason to believe that an eligible entity to which it issued a food or facility certification may no longer be in compliance with the applicable food safety requirements of the FD&C Act and FDA regulations, the accredited third-party certification body must conduct any monitoring (including an onsite audit) of such eligible entity necessary to determine whether the entity is in compliance with such requirements. The accredited third-party certification body must immediately notify FDA, under § 1.656(d), if it withdraws or suspends a food or facility certification because it determines that the entity is no longer in compliance with the applicable food safety requirements of the FD&C Act and FDA regulations. The accredited third-party certification body must maintain records of such monitoring under § 1.658.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>6
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED 
FROM THE FORM 10-Q AS OF JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY 
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>1
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-MOS
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>             903,131
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>            406,430
<RECEIVABLES>                           0
<ASSETS-OTHER>                      7,303
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                7,755
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    421,488
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                 0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>          71,443
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                71,443
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                         0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>          846,746
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>             106,990
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>             106,990
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>               0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                  0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                 0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>         (496,701)
<NET-ASSETS>                      350,045
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                       0
<INTEREST-INCOME>                     284
<OTHER-INCOME>                          0
<EXPENSES-NET>                    136,409
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>          (136,125)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>           55,079
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>         (81,742)
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>            (162,788)
<EQUALIZATION>                          0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>               0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                   0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                 0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>             0
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                     0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>           (162,788)
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                 0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>               0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                 0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>              0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>               4,650
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                   139,797
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>              431,439
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                   9
<PER-SHARE-NII>                        (1)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                 0 <F1>
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                    0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>               0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                    0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                     8
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                      31.6
<AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING>                  0
<AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE>                    0
<FN>
A zero value is used since the change in net unrealized fair value is not 
allocated to General Partners and Limited Partners as it is not taxable.  
Only taxable gains or losses are allocated in accordance with the 
Partnership Agreement.
</FN>

</TABLE>
|    |                                                                                           |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc.; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|                        |
|------------------------|
|                        |  |  |  |
| February 28, 2019 |   | By: | /s/ Michael S. Frankel |
|                   |   |   | Michael S. Frankel |
|                   |   |   | Co-Chief Executive Officer |
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published

and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 97-50489

Summary Calendar

VERONICA T. DAVIS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

BAPTIST MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, doing business as Baptist 

Medical Center Hospital, et al,

Defendants,

BAPTIST MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, doing business as Baptist Memorial Center Hospital,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Western District of Texas

(SA-93-CV-599)

January 9, 1998

Before WISDOM, WIENER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Veronica T. Davissued Baptist Memorial Hospital System, her former employer, and several

of its employees for racial discrimination in violation of Title VII o f the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Following a jury trial, she recovered $15,000 in punitive damages. On November 13, 1995, both

partiesfiled post-trialmotionsseeking to amend the judgment. Davis specifically requested the court

to invoke its equitable powersto grant an appropriate remedy to compensate her for lost wages, both

past and future. On March 28, 1996, the district court denied all post-trial motions except that it

granted Davis an award of attorneys’ fees. Davis filed a motion to reconsider on April 8, 1996, but

that motion was denied on April 30. Davis filed a notice of appeal on May 8,1996. This Court
 

2 Davis does not specifically state that she is relying upon this rule. Rule 60(b)(6) is the only

possible basis for her motion, however, because that motion was filed after the 10-day time period

for a valid Rule 59 motion and it does not qualify under subparts (1) - (5) of Rule 60(b).

 

3 Lancaster v. Presley, 35 F.3d 229, 231 (5th Cir. 1994).

 

4

Id.; Latham v. Wells Fargo Bank, 987 F.2d 1199, 1203 (5th Cir. 1993).

 

5

See Lancaster, 35 F.3d at 232.

2

dismissed Davis’s appeal as untimely on August 13, 1996. 

On January2, 1997, Davisfiled more post-trialmotionsin the district court,seeking equitable

relief, an opportunity to reopen her case, and a hearing. We read these motionsto be filed under Fed.

R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6).2 The district court denied those motions on May 12, 1997. On June 10, 1997,

Davis filed her notice of appeal. We review the district court’s denial of Davis’s Rule 60(b)(6)

motion for abuse of discretion.3

We have held on numerous occasions that Rule 60(b) cannot be used as a substitute for a

timelyappeal.4 The issues raised by Davis’s current motion are substantially the same as those raised

in her previous post-trial motions. The district court has already ruled against her, and Davis failed

to perfect a timely appeal. Davis cannot revive that previous dispute by merely reasserting those

issues in another Rule 60(b) motion.5 

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Davis’s motions. The judgment is

AFFIRMED.
From: Armstrong, Ashley 

Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 10:26 AM

To: Armstrong, Ashley

Subject: Regional Standards Enforcement for Residential Central Air Conditioners, Heat Pumps, and 

Furnaces

Good Morning,

DOE issued a notice of data availability announcing the Framework document for regional standards 

enforcement of residential central air conditioners, heat pumps, and furnaces. You can find both 

documents on DOE's enforcement website at 

http://www.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/certification_enforcement.html. DOE will 

be holding a joint public meeting with the Federal Trade Commission regarding regional standards 

enforcement on December 16, 2011. Note, foreign nationals visiting DOE Headquarters for this public 

meeting are subject to advance security screening procedures, so please notify Ms. Brenda Edwards 

immediately (202.586.2945) if you plan to attend the public meeting to begin the screening process.

Best Regards,

Ashley
# EUR-Lex - 31992R2059 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31992R2059

**Council Regulation (EEC) No 2059/92 of 30 June 1992 amending Regulation (EEC) No 845/72 laying down special measures to encourage silkworm rearing **

*
Official Journal L 215 , 30/07/1992 P. 0019 - 0019 *

COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) No 2059/92 of 30 June 1992 amending Regulation (EEC) No 845/72 laying down special measures to encourage silkworm rearing

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, and in particular Article 43 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission (1),

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (2),

Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee (3),

Whereas Article 2 (1) of Regulation (EEC) No 845/72 (4) stipulates, inter alia, that the aid for silkworms is to be fixed each year by 1 August in respect of the rearing year beginning in the following calendar year; whereas, in view of current practice, that provision should be adapted,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In Article 2 of Regulation (EEC) No 845/72, paragraph 1 is hereby replaced by the following:

'1. With effect from the 1972/73 rearing year, aid shall be granted for silkworms reared within the Community.

Such aid, the amount of which shall be uniform throughout the Community, shall be fixed annually.'

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Luxembourg, 30 June 1992.

For the Council

The President

Arlindo MARQUES CUNHA

(1) OJ No C 119, 11. 5. 1992, p. 36.(2) OJ No C 150, 15. 6. 1992.(3) OJ No C 169, 6. 7. 1992.(4) OJ No L 100, 27. 4. 1972, p. 1. Amended by Regulation (EEC) No 4005/87 (OJ No L 377, 31. 12. 1987, p. 48).
S. 101

One Hundred Ninth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the third day of January, two thousand and six

An Act

To convey to the town of Frannie, Wyoming, certain land withdrawn by the Commissioner of Reclamation.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF LAND TO THE TOWN OF FRANNIE,

WYOMING.

(a) CONVEYANCE.—Subject to valid existing rights, the Secretary

of the Interior shall convey by quitclaim deed, without consideration,

all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the

parcel of land described in subsection (b) to the town of Frannie,

Wyoming.

(b) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The parcel of land referred to in

subsection (a) is the parcel of land withdrawn by the Commissioner

of Reclamation—

(1) consisting of approximately 37,500 square feet;

(2) located in the town of Frannie, Wyoming; and

(3) more particularly described in the approved Plat of

Survey of Frannie Townsite, Wyoming, as the North 1⁄2 of

Block 26, T. 58 N, R. 97 W.

(c) RESERVATION OF MINERAL RIGHTS.—The conveyance under

subsection (a) shall be subject to the reservation by the United

States of any oil and gas rights.

(d) REVOCATIONS.—

(1) SPECIAL USE PERMIT.—The special use permit issued

by the Commissioner of Reclamation, numbered O–LM–60–

L1413, and dated April 20, 1990, is revoked with respect to

the land described in subsection (b).

(2) SECRETARIAL ORDERS.—The following Secretarial Orders

issued by the Commissioner of Reclamation are revoked with

respect to the land described in subsection (b):

(A) The Secretarial Order for the withdrawal of land

for the Shoshone Reclamation Project dated October 21,

1913, as amended.

(B) The Secretarial Order for the withdrawal of land

for the Frannie Townsite Reservation dated April 19, 1920.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Louisiana Coastal Ecosystem

Louisiana's coast and its degradation

and restoration are major environmental

issues being studied at the National

Wetlands Research Center. Coastal

ecosystems are vulnerable because of

the tremendous amount of human

activity that takes place along the coast.

Information on ecological processes is

essential to guide the development along

the coast as well as to protect and

restore wildlife habitat.

Louisiana has about 40% of coastal

wetlands in the lower 48 states; they

support fish, waterfowl, and fur-bearing

animals as well as unique cultures like

that of the Acadians. The fish and

wildlife resources of Louisiana's coast

produce over $1 billion each year in

revenues.

But Louisiana has the highest coastal

loss rate because of natural and human

causes. Over the past three decades,

Louisiana has lost as much as 35-40 mi2

(90-104 km2) of coastal wetlands a year.

The National Wetlands Research

Center is qualified to assess and monitor

this ecosystem because of its proximity

to the study area, a

staff chosen for their

expertise in the

system, and a number

of established

partnerships with

others who study the

areas. The Center is

often the lead group

in partnerships with

universities, other

federal agencies, and

private entities who

study this ecosystem.

Most of the

Center's research and

technology development performed for

coastal wetlands are done at the

Lafayette headquarters; some work is

performed at the National Wetlands

Research Center's project office in Baton

Rouge, LA.

Some current projects at NWRC:

 Understanding why Louisiana

coastal wetlands are being lost at

such a high rate

 Studying functions, values, and

restoration methods of Louisiana

coastal wetlands

 Assessing population biology and

habitat needs of trust species

(migratory birds, endangered

species)

 Studying coastal erosion and the

functions and values of coastal

habitats in providing productive

biological systems for the economy

and recreation

 Providing technical assistance and

information to task forces and

leading the monitoring associated

with the Coastal Wetlands Planning,

Protection, and Restoration Act

 Looking into ways to restore coastal

upland habitats

 Understanding human impacts on

function and value of habitat for

trust species

 Developing technological tools to

assist in the assessment and preservation of the ecosystem and

transferring that technology to

appropriate audiences

 Providing resources and professional support for researchers and

users of biological information;

ensuring that the information is

provided in the most usable format

for a variety of audiences such as

decision- and policy-makers and the

general public.

U.S. Department of the Interior

U.S. Geological Survey

USGS FS-015-00

June 2000

For more information, contact:

U.S. Geological Survey/National Wetlands Research Center,

700 Cajundome Blvd., Lafayette, LA 70506; 337-266-8500;

Fax: 337-266-8513; http://www.nwrc.usgs.gov
A e maua i le ma’i suka, tausi lelei i lou fatu. Afai ua e maua i le ma’i suka, o lona

uiga ole a faigofie ona e maua i ma’i o le fatu po’o ma’i o neura pepe. E mafai ona 

e sao mai lea tulaga pe’a e tausi ma pulea lelei lou ma’i suka.

E mafai ona e ola umi ma maua le soifua maloloina pe’a lelei ona vaai lou suka, 

o lou toto ae maise ole maualuga o le ga’o i lou toto.

E mafai e le maualuga ole suka ona faaleagaina nisi o totoga ole tino e iai fatu ga’o

ma mata pe afai e umi o maua oe i le ma’i suka. O le toto maualuga o se ma’i faigata

ona o le a faaopoopo ai le mamafa i le galue ole fatu. A tele le ga’o i le toto o le a

faigofie ona poloka ala toto. A pulea lelei nei tulaga uma, ole a mafai ona e maua se

soifuaga maloloina.

Fesili I lau foma’i I fesili nei

O a fua o lo’u suka, maualuga o le toto ma le ga’o?

O a fuainumera e tatau ona iai?

O a mea e tatau ona ou fai ina ia maua ai le fua tonu e tatau ona iai?

Faaaoga le Pepa o Faamatalaga o i le isi itulau e tusia ai au tali i fesili o i luga.

Faatino nei loa ia tulaga

Ole a e maua se mafutaga umi ma lou aiga, faaleleia lou soifua maloloina ma faaitiitia 

lou ono maua i ma’i o le fatu ma le ma’i o neura pepe.

♥ Taumafa mea’ai tatau e iai fuala’au taumafa mata, fualaau aina, ituaiga pi ma 

taumafa e iai saito ma araisa e le’i fa’amamaina.

♥ Taumafa i meaai e laitiiti le masima ma le ga’o e fa’aaoga ai.

♥ Ia e maua se faamalositino mo le 30 minute i aso taitasi.

♥ Taofiofi le mamafa tele o lou tino — e ala i le taumafa o meaai tatau ma 

faagaoioi lou tino.

♥ Taofi le ulaula ma saili se fesoasoani pe a faigata ona tu’u.

♥ Tausisi i faatonuga o le inumia o vailaau e fa’atonu atu e lau foma’i.

♥ Fesili i lau foma’i pe tatau ona e inuina le fuala’au o le asipurini.

♥ Fesili i lou aiga ma au uo mo se fesoasoani i le tausia lelei o lou ma’i suka 

ma lou fatu.

1

2

3

samoan · april 2003

x



P



-

-

-

-

-

-
Sini

Tausi i lou fatu e ala i le tausia lelei ole maualuga ole suka ma le ga’o i lou toto atoa ai

ma le fua o lou toto.

Fa’aaoga nei fa’amaumauga e te iloa ai le tulaga o iai le fua o lou suka, toto ma le

ga’o i lou tino pe a e asiasi i le foma’i. Galulue ma lou aiga, au uo atoa ma lau foma’i,

ina ia ausia au sini.

Fua ole suka ile toto

O se suesuega faigofie e fua ai le suka i lou toto i le 3 masina ua mavae.

Maualuga e tatau ona iai: Ia itiiti nai lo le 7

IA FAALUA ONA FUA ILE TAUSAGA

Aso

Iuga

Fua ole toto

O le toto maualuga e ogaoga ona e faaopoopo ai le mamafa i le galue a le fatu.

Maualuga e tatau ona iai: Ia itiiti nai lo le 130/80

IA FUAINA I SO’O SE TAIMI E TE VAAI AI LE FOMA’I

Aso

Iuga

Pepa o Faamatalaga o le ma’i suka

Fua ole ga’o i le toto

A tele le ga’o ole a faaputuputu ma poloka ai ala toto.

Maualuga e tatau ona iai: Ia itiiti nai lo le 100

IA FUA I TAUSAGA TAITASI

Aso

Iuga

samoan · april 2003

O le Polokalame aoao mo

A’oa’oga i le Ma’i Suka, 

o se galuega tu’ufa’atasi lea a

Matagaluega ole Soifua

Maloloina ma Vaega Tutotonu

mo le Puipuia o Fa’ama’i.

Tuatusi i le initaneti:

www.ndep.nih.gov

Numera Telefoni: 

1-800-438-5383

nih publication no. 03-5058

ndep 52 - xx

- -