alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2019120DE.01003401.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 8.5.2019 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 120/34 |

---

Berichtigung der Delegierten Verordnung (EU) 2018/273 der Kommission vom 11. Dezember 2017 zur Ergänzung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1308/2013 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates hinsichtlich des Genehmigungssystems für Rebpflanzungen, der Weinbaukartei, der Begleitdokumente und der Zertifizierung, der Ein- und Ausgangsregister, der obligatorischen Meldungen, Mitteilungen und Veröffentlichung der mitgeteilten Informationen und zur Ergänzung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1306/2013 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates in Bezug auf die diesbezüglichen Kontrollen und Sanktionen sowie zur Änderung der Verordnungen (EG) Nr. 555/2008, (EG) Nr. 606/2009 und (EG) Nr. 607/2009 der Kommission und zur Aufhebung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 436/2009 und der Delegierten Verordnung (EU) 2015/560 der Kommission

(
[Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 58 vom 28. Februar 2018](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2018_058_R_TOC)
)

Seite 19, Artikel 21 Buchstabe b Ziffer i:

Anstatt:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| „i) | vorhandener Alkoholgehalt,“ |

muss es heißen:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| „i) | vorhandener Alkoholgehalt (in % vol),“. |

Seite 59, Anhang VII Teil III Abschnitt C Feld 6 vierter Aufzählungsstrich:

Anstatt:

„tatsächlicher Alkoholgehalt“

muss es heißen:

„vorhandener Alkoholgehalt (in % vol)“.

---
#### § 1309.02 Definitions.

Any term used in this part shall have the definition set forth in section 102 of the Act (21 U.S.C. 802) or part 1300 of this chapter.

[62 FR 13968, Mar. 24, 1997]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-70,851; TA-W-70,851A]

                    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (“Act”), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on March 25, 2010, applicable to workers and former workers of Kennametal, Inc., Irwin, Pennsylvania (subject firm). The Department's Notice of Determination was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on April 23, 2010 (75 FR 21354). The subject workers were engaged in                           ( print page 176)                        activities related to the production of tungsten carbide performs and armor piercing products.                

Information obtained by the Department revealed that the appropriate subdivision covered by the certification includes an auxiliary facility producing carbide tips.

Based on these findings, the Department is amending this certification to include workers of Kennametal, Inc., Bedford, Pennsylvania, including on-site leased workers of Spherion Staffing Services.

The amended notice applicable to TA-W-70,851 is hereby issued as follows:

All workers of Kennametal, Inc., Irwin, Pennsylvania (TA-W-70,851) and Kennametal, Inc., including on-site leased workers from Spherion Staffing Services, Bedford, Pennsylvania (TA-W-70,851A), who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after May 28, 2008, through March 25, 2012, and all workers in the group threatened with total or partial separation from employment on the date of certification through two years from the date of certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.

Signed in Washington, DC, this 14th day of December 2010.

Del Min Amy Chen,

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2010-33048 Filed 12-30-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
#### § 182.220 By when must I publish my drug-free workplace statement and establish my drug-free awareness program?

If you are a new recipient that does not already have a policy statement as described in § 182.205 and an ongoing awareness program as described in § 182.215, you must publish the statement and establish the program by the time given in the following table:

| If * * * | Then you * * * |
| --- | --- |
| (a) the performance period of the award is less than 30 days | must have the policy statement and program in place as soon as possible, but before the date on which performance is expected to be completed. |
| (b) the performance period of the award is 30 days or more | must have the policy statement and program in place within 30 days after award. |
| (c) you believe there are extraordinary circumstances that will require more than 30 days for you to publish the policy statement and establish the awareness program | may ask the agency awarding official to give you more time to do so. The amount of additional time, if any, to be given is at the discretion of the awarding official. |
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

TREVOR MATTIS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 41 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 25th day of May, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Motion Granted and Order F iled November 10 , 2015

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14
- 15
- 00581
- CR NO. 14
- 15
- 00582
- CR NO. 14
- 15
- 00583
- CR

____________ LUIS EDUARDO LARA , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee
On Appeal from the 405th District Court Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . 14CR2148 , 14CR2149, 14CR2150



### ORDER Appellant has filed a motion in which he requests that we order the court reporter to supplement the reporter’s record with the exhibits admitted at trial. The motion is GRANTED

. Accordingly, we order Carol Castillo, the deputy official court reporter, to file a supplemental reporter’s record containing all exhibits admitted at trial on or before December 7 , 2015

.Appellant’s brief is due 30 days after the supplemental reporter’s record is

filed. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 38.6(a)(2).
PER CURIAM
PUBLIC LAW 108–249—JUNE 25, 2004 118 STAT. 683

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3537:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):

Mar. 9, considered and passed House.

June 9, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 108–249

108th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 185 State

Street in Manhattan, Illinois, as the ‘‘Army Pvt. Shawn Pahnke Manhattan Post

Office’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

185 State Street in Manhattan, Illinois, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Army Pvt. Shawn Pahnke Manhattan Post Office’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Army Pvt.

Shawn Pahnke Manhattan Post Office’’.

Approved June 25, 2004.

June 25, 2004

[H.R. 3537]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> BD
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-26-1997
<CASH>                                          37,906
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,135,288
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                            381,083
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                           17,978
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                             38,757
<PP&E>                                          50,692
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,677,205
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<PAYABLES>                                   1,097,150
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                            189,968
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                               8,769
<LONG-TERM>                                     26,624
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0 
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,098
<OTHER-SE>                                     291,873
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,677,205
<TRADING-REVENUE>                               56,254
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                            78,553
<COMMISSIONS>                                  122,827
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                    1,877
<FEE-REVENUE>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              35,397
<COMPENSATION>                                 100,716
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 64,400
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      64,400
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    40,497
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.27
        

</TABLE>
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 9, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-60345

Summary Calendar

 

JOSE CARLOS AVILA,

Petitioner,

versus

JOHN ASHCROFT, UNITED STATES

ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

 

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

(BIA No. A74 654 026)

_______________________________________________________

Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Avila appeals the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals which denied

his request for cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b). We do not have

jurisdiction to review this decision. Title 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B) expressly provides
2

that no court has jurisdiction to review “[d]enials of discretionary relief,” including

requests for relief under § 1229b. Avila’s argument that this provision only applies when

relief is granted is rejected.

PETITION DISMISSED.
§ 1.1114 How does an accreditation body apply to FDA for recognition or renewal of recognition? ( a ) *Application for recognition or renewal of recognition.* An accreditation body seeking initial recognition or renewal of recognition must submit an application to FDA demonstrating that it meets the eligibility requirements in § 1.1113.
( b ) *Documentation of conformance with requirements.* The accreditation body must submit documentation of conformance with ISO/IEC 17011:2017(E) (incorporated by reference, see § 1.1101) and separate documentation of ILAC membership and ILAC MRA signatory status demonstrating competence to ISO/IEC 17011:2017(E) with a scope of “Testing: ISO/IEC 17025,” in meeting the requirements of § 1.1113(a) through (c). The accreditation body also must submit documentation of its compliance with § 1.1113(d).
( c ) *Signature.* An application for recognition or renewal of recognition must be signed in the manner designated by FDA by an individual authorized to act on behalf of the applicant for purposes of seeking recognition or renewal of recognition.
(logo)ColonyCapital

          AMC OPCO, LLC

 

Colony Capital AMC OPCO, LLC

515 South Flower Street, 44thFloor, Los Angeles, CA 90071

P 310.282.8820 | www.clny.com |NYSE: CLNY

 

 

March 20, 2019

 

 

**ANNUAL OFFICERS’ CERTIFICATE**

 

Reference is hereby made toMorgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2013-C8, Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates, Series 2013-C8 (the "Trust"), issued pursuantto that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of February 1, 2013(the "Agreement"), by and among Banc of America Merrill LynchCommercial Mortgage Inc., as depositor (the "Depositor"), Wells FargoBank, N.A. as servicer (the "Servicer"), NS Servicing II, LLC, asSpecial Servicer and whose role as Special Servicer was subsequently assignedto Colony Capital AMC OPCO, LLC (“Colony Capital AMC OPCO”, or the “Special Servicer”),U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (the "Trustee"), WellsFargo Bank, National Association, as certificate administrator, certificateregistrar and authenticating agent (the "Certificate Administrator")and, in its capacity as Custodian (the “Custodian”), and Situs Holdings, LLC,as trust advisor (the “Trust Advisor”). Capitalized terms used herein nototherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 13.9 ofthe Agreement, I, Scott D. Freeman, Vice President of Colony Capital Operating Company,LLC as the sole member of Colony Capital OP Subsidiary, LLC, the sole member ofColony Capital Investment Holdco, LLC, which is sole member of Colony AMC, LLC,which in turn is the sole member of Colony Capital AMC OPCO, does hereby certifyin my capacity as an officer of Colony Capital Operating Company, LLC andwithout personal liability, that:

 

1.       A review of the activities of theSpecial Servicer during the year ended December 31, 2018 (the “ReportingPeriod”), and of its performance under the Agreement during such period hasbeen made under my supervision; and

 

2.       To the best of my knowledge, basedon such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations underthis Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned have executed this Certificate as of the 7th day of March 2019.

 

/s/ Scott D. Freeman

Scott D. Freeman

Vice President

Colony Capital OperatingCompany, LLC
§ 1140.30 Scope of permissible forms of labeling and advertising. ( a ) ( 1 ) A manufacturer, distributor, or retailer may, in accordance with this subpart D, disseminate or cause to be disseminated advertising or labeling which bears a cigarette or smokeless tobacco brand name (alone or in conjunction with any other word) or any other indicia of tobacco product identification, in newspapers; in magazines; in periodicals or other publications (whether periodic or limited distribution); on billboards, posters, and placards; in nonpoint-of-sale promotional material (including direct mail); in point-of-sale promotional material; and in audio or video formats delivered at a point-of-sale.
( 2 ) A manufacturer, distributor, or retailer intending to disseminate, or to cause to be disseminated, advertising or labeling for cigarettes or smokeless tobacco in a medium that is not listed in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, shall notify the agency 30 days prior to the use of such medium. The notice shall describe the medium and discuss the extent to which the advertising or labeling may be seen by persons younger than 18 years of age. The manufacturer, distributor, or retailer shall send this notice to the Office of Compliance and Enforcement, Center for Tobacco Products, Food and Drug Administration, Document Control Center, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. G335, Silver Spring, MD 20993.
( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) This subpart D does not apply to cigarette or smokeless tobacco package labels.
[75 FR 13230, Mar. 19, 2010, as amended at 83 FR 13183, Mar. 28, 2018]
EX-10.5



 







Exhibit 10.5




Amendment to the

Selective Insurance Stock Option Plan III



The Selective Insurance Stock Option Plan III (“Stock Option Plan III”) is amended, effective as of
July 26, 2006, as follows:





	1.	 	Section 2(k) is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:






	 	(k)	 	“Fair Market Value” shall mean the closing selling price for Shares
reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market (or on the NASDAQ Global Market or NASDAQ
Capital Market or on a national securities exchange if Shares subsequently trade on
such an exchange) on the date of grant (or on such other date as such value must be
determined), or if the date of grant, or such other date, is not a trading day, on
the most recent trading date immediately prior to the date of grant, or such other
applicable date.






	2.	 	Except as set forth in this Amendment to the Selective Insurance Stock Option Plan III, Stock
Option Plan III shall remain in full force and effect.
H. Res. 875

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 6, 2006.

Whereas Spelman College was established by Sophia B. Packard and Harriet E. Giles, school teachers and Baptist 

missionaries, in 1881 in Atlanta, Georgia, for the purpose of educating African American women and girls; 

Whereas as a result of the benevolence of John D. Rockefeller, Sr. and Laura Spelman Rockefeller, the name of 

the institution was changed from ‘‘Atlanta Baptist Female Seminary’’ to ‘‘Spelman Seminary’’ in honor of the 

Spelman family; 

Whereas the curriculum expanded to include high school and 

college classes, and Spelman Seminary conferred its first 

high school diplomas in 1887, and its first college degrees 

in 1901; 

Whereas in 1924, Spelman Seminary officially became 

Spelman College and grew to become a leading undergraduate institution for African American women; 

Whereas Spelman College was ranked among the top 75 Best 

Liberal Arts Colleges according to U.S. News & World 

Report, 2007 edition; 

Whereas Spelman College is one of six institutions designated 

by the National Science Foundation and the National 

Aeronautics and Space Administration as a Model Insti-
2

•HRES 875 EH 

tution for Excellence in undergraduate science and math 

education; 

Whereas the administration of Spelman College has initiated 

a strategic plan for Spelman (‘‘Spelman ALIVE’’) that 

includes five goals: Academic excellence, Leadership development, Improving the infrastructure, Visibility of accomplishments of the campus community, and Exemplary 

customer service, all designed to create a vision for 

Spelman of ‘‘Nothing Less than the Best’’; and 

Whereas Spelman College has prepared more than six generations of African American women to reach the highest 

levels of academic, community, and professional achievement: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) congratulates Spelman College on the occasion 

of its 125th anniversary; and 

(2) commends the administration, faculty, staff, 

students, and alumnae of Spelman College for their outstanding achievements, and contributions to African 

American education, history, and culture. 

Attest:

Clerk.
38522.

#### SWINEY v. DEKALB COUNTY *et al.*

Carlisle, Judge.

The petition in this case alleges that the plaintiff is the owner of land abutting on Old Shallowford Road in DeKalb County near where it crosses the north fork of Peachtree Creek; that the defendant county, on its own account, or the State Highway Department acting for and in conjunction with the county, relocated the road where it crosses Peachtree Creek, built a new bridge, or culvert, across the creek and graded and paved the road and approaches thereto; that as a part of the project of relocating and rebuilding the road and building the new bridge and culvert “the old bridge over said Old Shallowford Road was taken out and removed or allowed to fall in,” and that, “because of said facts traffic can no longer cross over said creek upon said old road at the site of said old and formerly maintained bridge and can no longer use said Old Shallowford Road between the new Shallowford and the expressway by peti*732tioner’s said property,” and that, “said acts amount to an abandonment of said Old Shallowford Road as it existed along petitioner’s property and they also amount to an abandonment of said former bridge.” The petition alleges that the plaintiff is entitled to just and adequate compensation for damages sustained to his property and that before “said acts” were committed by the defendants, his property had a reasonable market value of $15,000 and that after the commission of said acts it had a reasonable market value of not exceeding $1,000.

Decided November 10, 1960

Rehearing denied November 21, 1960.

*Young H. Fraser, Carl T. Hudgins,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Eugene Cook, Attorney-General, Carter*Goode, *Paul Miller, Assistant Attorneys-General, George Dillard,*contra.

Reasonably construed, the allegations of the petition seek damages solely on account of the failure of the county to maintain the old bridge on Old Shallowford Road across Peachtree Creek. The plaintiff does not allege that he has suffered any damage resulting from the new construction per se, or that the new construction denies him access which he formerly enjoyed to Old Shallowford Road. The only damage which the plaintiff shows he has suffered results from the failure of the county authorities to work and keep up the Old Shallowford Road and to maintain the bridge thereon, which road and bridge have not been discontinued or abandoned in the manner prescribed by law. In such circumstances, the only remedy of property owners affected by such failure is by mandamus to compel the county authorities to keep up and repair the road as an established road. *Wellmaker v. Lamar County Advisory Board,*43 Ga. App. 816 (1) (160 S. E. 708). *Code*§ 64-102. Under these circumstances, the trial judge did not err in sustaining the general demurrer and in dismissing the petition.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Townsend, P. J., and Frankum, J., concur. Jordan, J., not participating.*