alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 200.104 Supersession. As described in § 200.110, this part supersedes the following OMB guidance documents and regulations under title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations: ( a ) A-21, “Cost Principles for Educational Institutions” (2 CFR part 220);
( b ) A-87, “Cost Principles for State, Local and Indian Tribal Governments” (2 CFR part 225) and also Federal Register notice 51 FR 552 (January 6, 1986);
( c ) A-89, “Federal Domestic Assistance Program Information”;
( d ) A-102, “Grant Awards and Cooperative Agreements with State and Local Governments”;
( e ) A-110, “Uniform Administrative Requirements for Awards and Other Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals, and Other Nonprofit Organizations” (codified at 2 CFR 215);
( f ) A-122, “Cost Principles for Non-Profit Organizations” (2 CFR part 230);
( g ) A-133, “Audits of States, Local Governments and Non-Profit Organizations”; and
( h ) Those sections of A-50 related to audits performed under subpart F of this part.
[78 FR 78608, Dec. 26, 2013, as amended at 79 FR 75882, Dec. 19, 2014; 85 FR 49538, Aug. 13, 2020]
#### § 111.73 What is your responsibility for determining whether established specifications are met?

You must determine whether the specifications you establish under § 111.70 are met.
#### § 1108.195 Fixed-amount award.

*Fixed-amount award* means a DoD Component grant or cooperative agreement that provides for the recipient to be paid on the basis of performance and results, rather than the actual, allowable costs the recipient incurs.
H. Res. 885

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

June 22, 2006.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it 

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order 

to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 5638) to amend the 

Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the unified credit 

against the estate tax to an exclusion equivalent of 

$5,000,000 and to repeal the sunset provision for the estate 

and generation-skipping taxes, and for other purposes. The 

bill shall be considered as read. The amendment printed in 

the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution shall be considered as adopted. The previous question 

shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, to 

final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour 

of debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 

ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and 
2

•HRES 885 EH 

Means; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest: 

Clerk.
§ 1128.410 Approved budget. ( a ) *OMB guidance.* As described in 2 CFR 200.308(a), the approved budget for a grant or cooperative agreement may include both the Federal and non-Federal shares of funding under the award or only the Federal share.
( b ) *DoD implementation.* For DoD grants and cooperative agreements, the approved budget includes the Federal share and any cost sharing or matching that the recipient is required to provide under the award.
( c ) *Award terms and conditions.* A DoD Component's general terms and conditions therefore must include the wording appendix D to this part provides for Section A of FMS Article IV.
Exhibit 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection with the accompanying amended Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB/A of Velocity Asset Management, Inc. for the nine months ended September
30, 2006, I, James J. Mastriani, Chief Financial Officer of Velocity Asset
Management, Inc., do hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) such amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A for the
nine months ended September 30, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) the information contained in such amended Quarterly Report
on Form 10-QSB/A for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Velocity Asset Management, Inc.


                                             /s/ JAMES J. MASTRIANI
                                             ---------------------------
                                             James J. Mastriani
                                             Chief Financial Officer
November 24, 2006

                                       21
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*January 8, 2008*

[Cite as *01108/2008 Case Announcements,*2008-0hio-18.]

DISCIPLINARY CASES

2007-0401.

#### In re Heisler.

On April 16, 2007, this court suspended respondent, Dwight D. Heisler, Attorney Registration No. *14660029005, last known business address in Bowling Green, Ohio, for an interim period pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(A)(4). On January 4, 2008, the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline submitted a notice pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(D)(l)(c) notifying this court that respondent no longer was in default of the child support order previously submitted to the court. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by the court that pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(D)(1), respondent is reinstated in this matter.

It is further ordered that pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(D)(2), this reinstatement shall not terminate respondent’s current suspension in 2006-2309, *Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Heisler,*or in any pending disciplinary proceedings against respondent.

It is further ordered that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 22

- 00028

- CR

IN RE WILLIAM CHARLES WEBB

From the 54th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012

- 678

- C2

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus filed on February 1, 2022, is denied. 1

STEVE SMITH

Justice

1 Webb has already been appointed counsel to pursue a Chapter 64 motion for DNA testing and,

therefore, is not entitled to a ruling on his pro se Chapter 64 motion. To compel such a ruling would be in

derogation of the prohibition on hybrid representation.In re Webb Page 2

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Smith

, and Justice Wright 2

Petition denied

Opinion delivered and filed February 23, 2022

Do not publish

[OT06 ]

2 The Honorable Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired) of the Eleventh Court of Appeals,

sitting by assignment of the Chief Justice of the Texas Supreme Court. See T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN . §§ 74.003,

75.002, 75.003.
§ 418.600 Semi-annual compilation. ( a ) The head of each agency shall collect and compile the disclosure reports (see appendix B) and, on May 31 and November 30 of each year, submit to the Secretary of the Senate and the Clerk of the House of Representatives a report containing a compilation of the information contained in the disclosure reports received during the six-month period ending on March 31 or September 30, respectively, of that year.
( b ) The report, including the compilation, shall be available for public inspection 30 days after receipt of the report by the Secretary and the Clerk.
( c ) Information that involves intelligence matters shall be reported only to the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives, and the Committees on Appropriations of the Senate and the House of Representatives in accordance with procedures agreed to by such committees. Such information shall not be available for public inspection.
( d ) Information that is classified under Executive Order 12356 or any successor order shall be reported only to the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives or the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives (whichever such committees have jurisdiction of matters involving such information) and to the Committees on Appropriations of the Senate and the House of Representatives in accordance with procedures agreed to by such committees. Such information shall not be available for public inspection.
( e ) The first semi-annual compilation shall be submitted on May 31, 1990, and shall contain a compilation of the disclosure reports received from December 23, 1989 to March 31, 1990.
( f ) Major agencies, designated by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), are required to provide machine-readable compilations to the Secretary of the Senate and the Clerk of the House of Representatives no later than with the compilations due on May 31, 1991. OMB shall provide detailed specifications in a memorandum to these agencies.
( g ) Non-major agencies are requested to provide machine-readable compilations to the Secretary of the Senate and the Clerk of the House of Representatives.
( h ) Agencies shall keep the originals of all disclosure reports in the official files of the agency.
# L_2004239EN.01003601.xml

| 9.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 239/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 239/36

---

Corrigendum to Council Directive 93/32/EEC of 14 June 1993 on passenger hand-holds on two-wheel motor vehicles

(
  Official Journal of the European Communities L 188 of 29 July 1993
  )

On page 28, in Article 4(1), first subparagraph:

for:

‘... to comply with this Directive not later than 14 December 1993.’,

read:

‘... to comply with this Directive no later than 14 December 1994.’.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code)


Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of National Datacomputer, Inc., a Delaware Corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2003
(the "Form 10-QSB") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the
information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated: November 14, 2003                        /s/  John P. Ward
                                                -------------------------------
                                                John P. Ward
                                                Chief Executive Officer



Dated: November 14, 2003                        /s/ Gerald S. Eilberg
                                                -------------------------------
                                                Gerald S. Eilberg
                                                Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 950.35 Payment of final claim determination.

Once a Final Claim Determination is reached by the methods set forth in this subpart, the parties intend that such a Final Claim Determination shall constitute a final settlement of the claim and the sponsor may immediately present to the Department a Final Claim Determination for payment.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 912 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 912

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     September 6, 2006.
Whereas life insurance is an essential part of a sound financial plan;
Whereas life insurance provides financial security for families by helping 
        surviving members meet immediate and long-term financial obligations and 
        objectives in the event of a premature death in their family;
Whereas approximately 68,000,000 United States citizens lack the adequate level 
        of life insurance coverage needed to ensure a secure financial future 
        for their loved ones;
Whereas life insurance products protect against the uncertainties of life by 
        enabling individuals and families to manage the financial risks of 
        premature death, disability, and long-term care;
Whereas individuals, families, and businesses can benefit from professional 
        insurance and financial planning advice, including an assessment of 
        their life insurance needs; and
Whereas numerous groups supporting life insurance have designated September of 
        2006 as National Life Insurance Awareness Month as a means to encourage 
        consumers to (1) become more aware of their life insurance needs; (2) 
        seek professional advice regarding life insurance; and (3) take the 
        actions necessary to achieve financial security for their loved ones: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of National Life Insurance 
        Awareness Month; and
            (2) requests that the President issue a proclamation calling on the 
        Federal Government, States, localities, schools, nonprofit 
        organizations, businesses, and the citizens of the United States to 
        observe the month with appropriate programs and activities.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1017

AN ACT

To reauthorize grants for the water resources research and

technology institutes established under the Water Resources Research Act of 1984.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Water Resources Re5 search Act Amendments of 2005’’.
 †

2

S 1017 ES

1 SEC. 2. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH.

2 (a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section

3 104(f) of the Water Resources Research Act of 1984 (42

4 U.S.C. 10303(f)) is amended—

5 (1) in the subsection header, by striking ‘‘IN

6 GENERAL’’;

7 (2) by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the

8 following:

9 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—There is authorized to be

10 appropriated to carry out this section, to remain

11 available until expended—

12 ‘‘(A) $12,000,000 for each of fiscal years

13 2006 through 2008; and

14 ‘‘(B) $13,000,000 for each of fiscal years

15 2009 and 2010.’’; and

16 (3) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘(2) Any’’ and

17 inserting the following:

18 ‘‘(2) FAILURE TO OBLIGATE FUNDS.—Any’’.

19 (b) ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS WHERE RE20 SEARCH FOCUSED ON WATER PROBLEMS OF INTERSTATE

21 NATURE.—Section 104(g) of the Water Resources Re22 search Act of 1984 (42 U.S.C. 10303(g)) is amended—

23 (1) by redesignating paragraph (2) as para24 graph (4); and

25 (2) in paragraph (1)—

26 (A) in the first sentence—
†

3

S 1017 ES

1 (i) by striking ‘‘(1) There’’ and insert2 ing the following:

3 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—There’’; and

4 (ii) by striking ‘‘$3,000,000 for fiscal

5 year 2001, $4,000,000 for each of fiscal

6 years 2002 and 2003, and $6,000,000 for

7 each of fiscal years 2004 and 2005’’ and

8 inserting ‘‘$6,000,000 for each of fiscal

9 years 2006 through 2008 and $7,000,000

10 for each of fiscal years 2009 and 2010’’;

11 (B) in the second sentence, by striking

12 ‘‘Such’’ and inserting the following:

13 ‘‘(2) NON-FEDERAL MATCHING FUNDS.—The’’;

14 and

15 (C) in the third sentence, by striking

16 ‘‘Funds’’ and inserting the following:

17 ‘‘(3) AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS.—Funds’’.

Passed the Senate September 27, 2005.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1017

AN ACT

To reauthorize grants for the water resources re1984. under the Water Resources Research Act of search and technology institutes established
EX-21

                     SUBSIDIARIES OF GLOBAL DIRECTMAIL CORP


A.       DOMESTIC SUBSIDARIES

         1.       Systemax Inc. (a New York corporation)
                  d/b/a Global Computer Supplies (GA, CA, IL) d/b/a Global
                  Occupational Safety (NY, GA)

         2.       Continental Dynamics Corp. (a New York corporation)
                   d/b/a Global Computer Supplies (NY)
                  d/b/a Global Industrial Equipment (NY, GA)
                  d/b/a Global Business Furniture (NY, GA)

         3.       Dartek Corp. (a Delaware corporation)

         4.       Nexel Industries Inc. (a New York corporation)

         5.       Misco America Inc. (a Delaware corporation)

         6.       Tiger Direct Inc. (a Florida corporation)

         7.       Midwest Micro Corp. (a Delaware corporation)

         8.       EZBID Inc. (a Delaware corporation)


B.       FOREIGN SUBSIDIARIES

         1.       Misco Germany Inc. (a New York corporation)

         2.       Misco Italy Computer Supplies S.P.A. (an
                  Italian corporation)

         3.       H C S Global SA (a French corporation)

         4.       Global DirectMail Ltd. (a U.K. corporation)
EX-10.1



 









Exhibit 10.1




TERMINATION ADDENDUM

EXCESS OF LOSS RETROCESSION AGREEMENT

BY AND BETWEEN

PLATINUM UNDERWRITERS BERMUDA, LTD.

(RETROCEDANT)




and




PLATINUM RE (UK) LIMITED

(RETROCESSIONAIRE)




     IT IS HEREBY MUTUALLY AGREED that effective December 31, 2005, this Agreement (“Agreement”),
dated as of April 1, 2005, by and between Platinum Re UK Limited (the “Retrocessionaire”), and
Platinum Underwriters Bermuda Ltd. (the “Retrocedant”), is Terminated.



     The Retrocessionaire shall return 12.5% of the Original Premium, or $550,000 as consideration
for the early termination of its exposure. The $550,000 is to be returned immediately. The
Reinstatement Premium will remain unchanged, calculated at pro rata of $4,400,000 as respects the
fraction of the indemnity exhausted.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed in duplicate by
their respective officers duly authorized so to do, on the date set forth below.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Platinum Re (UK) Limited	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Les Waters	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Name: Les Waters	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Title: Underwriting Manager	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Platinum Underwriters Bermuda, Ltd.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Francois Bertrand	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Name: Francois Bertrand	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Title: Senior Vice President
H. Res. 906

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

July 12, 2006.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 

the bill (H.R. 2990) to improve ratings quality by fostering 

competition, transparency, and accountability in the credit 

rating agency industry. The first reading of the bill shall be 

dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of 

the bill are waived. General debate shall be confined to the 

bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the 

Committee on Financial Services. After general debate the 

bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute 

rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for 

the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule the 

amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the 

Committee on Financial Services now printed in the bill. The 

committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be 
2

•HRES 906 EH 

considered as read. Notwithstanding clause 11 of rule XVIII, 

no amendment to the committee amendment in the nature of 

a substitute shall be in order except those printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. 

Each such amendment may be offered only in the order 

printed in the report, may be offered only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided 

and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not 

be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question in the House or in the 

Committee of the Whole. All points of order against such 

amendments are waived. At the conclusion of consideration of 

the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report 

the bill to the House with such amendments as may have 

been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in 

the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of 

the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in the 

nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final 
3

•HRES 906 EH 

passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

Attest:

Clerk.
#### § 1.681 How frequently must eligible entities be recertified?

An eligible entity seeking recertification of a food or facility certification under this subpart must apply for recertification prior to the expiration of its certification. For certifications used in meeting the requirements of section 801(q) or 806 of the FD&C Act, FDA may require an eligible entity to apply for recertification at any time FDA determines appropriate under such section.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION FOR R EHEARING

Appellate case name: Bruce Egrim Joseph v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 14

- 00737

- CR

Trial court case number: 05

- DCR

- 043408A

Trial court: 268th District Court of Fort Bend County

On November 13, 201 4

, this Court denied appellant’s motion for rehearing without modifying or vacating our judgment or issuing a different opinion. On November 26, 2014, appellant filed “Appellant’s Further Motion for Rehearing.” The appellate rules authorize a second or subsequent motion for rehearing only if the court of appeals alters its judgment or opinion in conjunction with the overruling of a previous motion. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 49.5.

Because our denial of a ppellant’s original motion for rehearing did not alter our judgment or opinion, appellant’s further motion for rehearing is not authorized by the appellate rules. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 49.5; Rodriguez v. State , 28 S.W.3d 25, 26 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 2002, no pet.) (“ Even if appellant ’ s further motion for rehearing were timely, rule 49.5 does not apply because we did not modify the judgment, vacate the judgment, or issue a new opinion in overruling the motion. ”)

. Accordingly, it is ordered that appell ant’s further motion for rehearing

is denied

.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jane Bland

Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Justices Higley, Bland, and Sharp.

Date: December 18, 2014