alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 950.33 Covered costs dispute resolution. ( a ) If a sponsor disagrees with the Claim Determination rendered in accordance with § 950.24 and cannot resolve the dispute informally with the Claims Administrator, then the parties agree that any dispute must be resolved as follows: ( 1 ) A sponsor shall, within thirty (30) days of receipt of the Claim Determination, deliver to the Claims Administrator in writing notice of and reasons for its disagreement (Sponsor's Rebuttal), including any expert opinion obtained by the sponsor.
( 2 ) After submission of the sponsor's rebuttal to the Claims Administrator, the parties have fifteen (15) days to informally and in good faith participate in mediation to resolve the disagreement before instituting the process under paragraph (b) of this section. If the parties reach agreement through mediation, the agreement shall constitute a Final Claim Determination.
( 3 ) The parties shall jointly select the mediator(s). The parties shall share equally the cost of the mediator(s).
( b ) If the parties cannot resolve the disagreement through mediation under the timeframe established under paragraph (a)(2) of this section, any remaining issues in controversy shall be submitted by the sponsor within ten (10) days to the Civilian Board or its successor, for resolution by an Administrative Judge of the Civilian Board utilizing the Board's Summary Binding Decision procedure. The parties shall abide by the procedures of the Civilian Board for Summary Binding Decision. The parties agree that the decision of the Civilian Board shall constitute a Final Claim Determination.
§ 1.243 Is food registration information available to the public? ( a ) The list of registered facilities and registration documents submitted under this subpart are not subject to disclosure under 5 U.S.C. 552 (the Freedom of Information Act). In addition, any information derived from such list or registration documents that would disclose the identity or location of a specific registered person, is not subject to disclosure under 5 U.S.C. 552 (the Freedom of Information Act).
( b ) Paragraph (a) of this section does not apply to any information obtained by other means or that has previously been disclosed to the public as defined in § 20.81 of this chapter.
###### Editorial Note on Part 112

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 112 appear at 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

#### § 112.175 Who responds to a petition requesting a variance?

The Director or Deputy Directors of the Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (CFSAN), or the Director, Office of Compliance, CFSAN, responds to a request for a variance.
§ 1.640 Who is eligible to seek accreditation? ( a ) A foreign government, agency of a foreign government, foreign cooperative, or any other third party may seek accreditation from a recognized accreditation body (or, where direct accreditation is appropriate, FDA) to conduct food safety audits and to issue food and facility certifications to eligible entities under this subpart. An accredited third-party certification body may use documentation of conformance with ISO/IEC 17021: 2011 or ISO/IEC 17065: 2012, supplemented as necessary, in meeting the applicable requirements of this subpart.
( b ) A foreign government or an agency of a foreign government is eligible for accreditation if it can demonstrate that its food safety programs, systems, and standards meet the requirements of §§ 1.641 through 1.645.
( c ) A foreign cooperative or other third party is eligible for accreditation if it can demonstrate that the training and qualifications of its agents used to conduct audits (or, in the case of a third-party certification body that is an individual, such individual) and its internal systems and standards meet the requirements of §§ 1.641 through 1.645.
EX-10.17 FORM OF LETTER AGREEMENT



 







Exhibit 10.17




FORM OF LETTER AGREEMENT FOR ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES




FREEDOM ACQUISITION HOLDINGS, INC.




                    , 2006




Berggruen Holdings, Inc.




Gentlemen:




     This letter will confirm our agreement, that commencing on the consummation date (the
“Closing Date”) of the initial public offering (“IPO”) of the securities of Freedom
Acquisition Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) and continuing until the earlier of the
consummation by the Company of a “Business Combination” or the liquidation of the Company (each, as
described in the Company’s IPO prospectus, and such earlier date, the “Termination Date”),
Berggruen Holdings, Inc. (“Berggruen”) shall make available to the Company certain office
space, administrative services and secretarial support, in the New York, New York area as may be
required by the Company from time to time, situated at 1114 Avenue of the Americas, 41st
Floor, New York, New York 10036 (or any successor location). In exchange therefor, the Company
shall pay to Berggruen the sum of $10,000 per month (the “Fee”) on the Closing Date and
continuing monthly thereafter until the Termination Date.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Very truly yours,	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	FREEDOM ACQUISITION HOLDINGS, INC.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Name:	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Title:	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 





	 	 	 	 	 
	AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	BERGGRUEN HOLDINGS, INC.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	Name:
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	Title:
Editorial Note on Part 112
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 112 appear at 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

§ 112.22 What minimum requirements apply for training personnel who conduct a covered activity? ( a ) At a minimum, all personnel who handle (contact) covered produce during covered activities or supervise the conduct of such activities must receive training that includes all of the following: ( 1 ) Principles of food hygiene and food safety;
( 2 ) The importance of health and personal hygiene for all personnel and visitors, including recognizing symptoms of a health condition that is reasonably likely to result in contamination of covered produce or food contact surfaces with microorganisms of public health significance; and
( 3 ) The standards established by FDA in subparts C through O of this part that are applicable to the employee's job responsibilities.
( b ) Persons who conduct harvest activities for covered produce must also receive training that includes all of the following: ( 1 ) Recognizing covered produce that must not be harvested, including covered produce that may be contaminated with known or reasonably foreseeable hazards;
( 2 ) Inspecting harvest containers and equipment to ensure that they are functioning properly, clean, and maintained so as not to become a source of contamination of covered produce with known or reasonably foreseeable hazards; and
( 3 ) Correcting problems with harvest containers or equipment, or reporting such problems to the supervisor (or other responsible party), as appropriate to the person's job responsibilities.
( c ) At least one supervisor or responsible party for your farm must have successfully completed food safety training at least equivalent to that received under standardized curriculum recognized as adequate by the Food and Drug Administration.
#### In the Matter of John B. (Anonymous), A Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

Appeals from two orders of the Family Court, *958Queens County, both dated December 5, 1967, each made in a separate proceeding and separately adjudicating appellant a juvenile delinquent, one order (Docket No. D1798/67) imposing placement of 18 months in the New York State Training School and the other order (Docket No. D1835/67) suspending judgment. Orders reversed, on the law, and both proceedings remanded to the Family Court for further proceedings consistent with the decision herein. The findings of fact below have not been considered. In the interests of justice, these matters should be remanded for *de novo*proceedings in which appellant may have the opportunity to be assisted by a law guardian. It is also our opinion that on the adjudicatory hearing in the proceeding under Docket No. 1835/67 incriminating statements attributed to appellant were improperly admitted in evidence *.(Matter of Gault,*387 U. S. 1; *Matter of William, L.,*29 A D 2d 182; *Matter of Aaron D.,*30 A D 2d 183). Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Benjamin and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
###### Editorial Note on Part 112

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 112 appear at 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

#### § 112.172 How may a State, tribe, or foreign country request a variance from one or more requirements of this part?

To request a variance from one or more requirements of this part, the competent authority (*i.e.,* the regulatory authority for food safety) for a State, tribe, or a foreign country must submit a petition under § 10.30 of this chapter.
#### § 1.99 Costs chargeable in connection with relabeling and reconditioning inadmissible imports.

The cost of supervising the relabeling or other action in connection with an import of food, drugs, devices, or cosmetics which fails to comply with the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act shall be paid by the owner or consignee who files an application requesting such action and executes a bond, pursuant to section 801(b) of the act, as amended. The cost of such supervision shall include, but not be restricted to, the following:

(a) Travel expenses of the supervising officer.

(b) Per diem in lieu of subsistence of the supervising officer when away from his or her home station, as provided by law.

(c) The charge for the services of the supervising officer, which shall include administrative support, shall be computed at a rate per hour equal to 267 percent of the hourly rate of regular pay of a grade GS-11/4 employee, except that such services performed by a customs officer and subject to the provisions of the act of February 13, 1911, as amended (sec. 5, 36 Stat. 901, as amended ([19 U.S.C. 267](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/19/267))), shall be calculated as provided in that act.

(d) The charge for the service of the analyst, which shall include administrative and laboratory support, shall be computed at a rate per hour equal to 267 percent of the hourly rate of regular pay of a grade GS-12/4 employee. The rate per hour equal to 267 percent of the equivalent hourly rate of regular pay of the supervising officer (GS-11/4) and the analyst (GS-12/4) is computed as follows:

Table 1 to Paragraph (d)

| | Hours |
| --- | --- |
| Gross number of working hours in 52 40-hr weeks | 2,080 |
| Less: | |
| 10 legal public holidays—New Year's Day, Birthday of Martin Luther King, Jr., Washington's Birthday, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Columbus Day, Veterans Day, Thanksgiving Day, and Christmas Day | 80 |
| Annual leave—26 d | 208 |
| Sick leave—13 d | 104 |
| Total | 392 |
| Net number of working hours | 1,688 |
| Gross number of working hours in 52 40-hr weeks | 2,080 |
| Working hour equivalent of Government contributions for employee retirement, life insurance, and health benefits computed at 81/2 pct. of annual rate of pay of employee | 176 |
| Equivalent annual working hours | 2,256 |
| Support required to equal to 1 person-year | 2,256 |
| Equivalent gross annual working hours charged to Food and Drug appropriation | 4,512 |
| | |
| --- | --- |
| **Note:** Ratio of equivalent gross annual number of working hours charged to Food and Drug appropriation to net number of annual working hours 4,512/1,688 = 267 pct. | |

(e) The minimum charge for services of supervising officers and of analysts shall be not less than the charge for 1 hour, and time after the first hour shall be computed in multiples of 1 hour, disregarding fractional parts less than 1⁄2 hour.

[[42 FR 15553](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/42-FR-15553), Mar. 22, 1977, as amended at [85 FR 50782](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/85-FR-50782), Aug. 18, 2020]
#### § 1.932 Under what circumstances may we modify or revoke a waiver?

We may modify or revoke a waiver if we determine that the waiver could result in the transportation of food under conditions that would be unsafe for human or animal health or that the waiver could be contrary to the public interest.
#### § 6000.1 Adoption of 2 CFR Part 200.

Except as otherwise may be provided by this part, the Federal Communications Commission adopts the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards set forth at 2 CFR part 200.
From: Susan Miller [mailto:SMiller@bia.org]

Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 2:36 PM

To: Nizich, Sharon

Cc: Paul Regina

Subject: RE: Green brick mercury data

Yes- I am sorry about the level of detail, but it is complicated. When mercury first became an issue 

for us, we were at our lowest financial point in a long time, maybe ever. Our focus was on formed 

green brick. Rarely do we use only material from one mine to make a product, but the research to 

determine the right combination of materials can take months...or more. You should be getting the 

Boral info today- and should have the Glen Gery as well.

We are continuing to look over the PM and mercury info- and are hearing that even just the PM 

limits could be impossible for most/many of our uncontrolled kilns- and that their only real 

alternative is a DIFF as a FF alone will degrade from even trace gaseous HAP. Working on some 

possible approaches on that- and listing a few concerns. Thanks for continuing to be open to 

discussions! And please let me know if you need any more information.

sus

Susan Miller

919 380-2191

smiller@bia.org

When you talk, you are only repeating what you already know; but when you listen, you may learn 

something new. 

-Dalai Lama

-----Original Message-----

From: Nizich, Sharon [mailto:Nizich.Sharon@epa.gov]

Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 1:49 PM

To: Susan Miller; Raymond, Gabrielle

Cc: Kristin Sroka; Tom Holloway

Subject: RE: Green brick mercury data

I think we have all the info now - we were hoping to get clay formation info but I do not think we 

received that.

Sharon Nizich

US EPA

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Sector Policies and Programs Division/SPPD RTP NC 

27711

(919) 541 2825
-----Original Message-----

From: Susan Miller [mailto:SMiller@bia.org]

Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 10:11 AM

To: Raymond, Gabrielle

Cc: Nizich, Sharon

Subject: RE: Green brick mercury data

Who have you heard from and who are you waiting for- on information on the raw material? I will 

help nudge them from this end.

Thanks

sus

Susan Miller

919 380-2191

smiller@bia.org

When you talk, you are only repeating what you already know; but when you listen, you may learn 

something new. 

-Dalai Lama
Order filed June 10, 2013 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-12-00441-CR

____________

DAVID SHANE WEST, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 405TH District Court

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 10CR2876

ORDER

This court has determined, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 

34.5(f) and 34.6(g)(2), that it must inspect the original of State's exhibits 1A, 1B, 

1C, 15 and 171 .
The clerk of the 405TH District Court is directed to deliver to the Clerk of 

this court the original of State's exhibits 1A, 1B, 1C, 15 and 171 , on or before 

June 20, 2013. The Clerk of this court is directed to receive, maintain, and keep 

safe this original exhibit; to deliver it to the justices of this court for their 

inspection; and, upon completion of inspection, to return the original of State's 

exhibits 1A, 1B, 1C, 15 and 171 , to the clerk of the 405TH District Court.

PER CURIAM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Balance Sheet as of May 31, 1996 and Statement of Operations
for the year then ended.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1996
<CASH>                                       5,278,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  368,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (124,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,542,022
<PP&E>                                         491,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                (62,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,928,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,177,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          750,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     7,195,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,353,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,928,000
<SALES>                                      2,238,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,238,000
<CGS>                                      (1,406,000)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              (1,406,000)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (3,462,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (172,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,802,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,802,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.81)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

OPEN-FILE REPORT 98-232

PLATE 1

WASHINGTON

VANCOUVER

ISILAND

g

tp
rd RSET

45
ie
{ere

f

y

SASS

“gt
Loree

Applications
Contracts

Certified Contracts

This map is preliminary and has not been

reviewed for conformity with U.S. fe) R E 6 (e) N
Geological Survey editorial standards or |

with the North American Stratigraphic Code.

— Sige

DMA

a

a

a

DMEA

fe)

°

118°

EXPLANATION

OME

o

33
“Numbers near property symbols are keyed
to map numbers in Table 1 of text

MAP OF WASHINGTON THAT SHOWS LOCATION OF MINING PROPERTIES THAT WERE INVOLVED IN THE DMA, DMEA, OR OME MINERAL EXPLORATION PROGRAMS

By
THOR H. KIILSGAARD

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

1998
EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-0361

----- Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 02/17/2010 01:14 PM

-----

|------------>

| From: |

|------------>

 >---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------|

 |Larry Sorrels/RTP/USEPA/US 

|

 >---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------|

|------------>

| To: |

|------------>

 >---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------|

 |Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

|

 >---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------|

|------------>

| Cc: |

|------------>

 >---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------|

 |Cathy Coats/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

|

 >---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------|

|------------>

| Date: |

|------------>

 >---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------|

 |02/17/2010 12:58 PM 

|

 >---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------|

|------------>

| Subject: |

|------------>

 >---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------|

 |Memo for CI RICE NESHAP docket - for economic spreadsheet data 

 

|

 >---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------|

Melanie,

Attached for inclusion in the CI RICE docket is 1) a spreadsheet containing 

Page 1
EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-0361

data used in the economic impact, energy impact, and small entity analyses, 

and 2) a memo to the docket explaining the spreadsheet's contents. Please let 

me know if you have questions.

Thanks.

(See attached file:

CINESHAP_RIA_final_economicenergyandsmallentitydata.xls)(See attached

file: MemoDocketEIAenergyRFACIRICENESHAP.doc)

Larry Sorrels

Economist

US EPA/OAQPS/HEID/ABCG

C439-02

RTP, NC 27711

(919) 541-5041

fax: (919) 541-0839

Page 2
§ 1.1174 How does an owner or consignee request a regulatory hearing on a directed food laboratory order? ( a ) *Request for hearing.* No later than 3 business days after FDA has issued the directed food laboratory order, an owner or consignee may submit a request for a regulatory hearing, conducted pursuant to part 16 of this chapter, on the directed food laboratory order. The directed food laboratory order will contain all of the elements required by § 16.22 of this chapter and will thereby constitute the notice of an opportunity for hearing under part 16 of this chapter.
( b ) *Submission of request for regulatory hearing.* The request for a regulatory hearing must be submitted with a written appeal that responds to the bases, as appropriate, for FDA's determinations described in the directed food laboratory order, together with any supporting information. The request, appeal, and supporting information must be submitted in accordance with the procedures described in the directed food laboratory order.
( c ) *Presiding officer.* The presiding officer for a regulatory hearing under this subpart will be designated after a request for a regulatory hearing is submitted to FDA.
( d ) *Denial of a request for regulatory hearing.* The presiding officer may deny a request for regulatory hearing under this subpart pursuant to § 16.26(a) of this chapter.
( e ) *Conduct of regulatory hearing.* ( 1 ) If the presiding officer grants a request for a regulatory hearing, such hearing will be held within 2 business days after the date the request was filed or, if applicable, within a timeframe agreed upon in writing by the requestor and the presiding officer and FDA.
( 2 ) The presiding officer may require that a hearing conducted under this subpart be completed within 1 business day, as appropriate.
( 3 ) The presiding officer must conduct the hearing in accordance with part 16 of this chapter, except that, pursuant to § 16.5(b) of this chapter, the procedures for a regulatory hearing described in part 16 of this chapter apply only to the extent that such procedures are supplementary and not in conflict with the procedures specified for the conduct of regulatory hearings under this subpart. Accordingly, the following requirements of part 16 of this chapter are inapplicable to regulatory hearings conducted under this subpart: § 16.22 (Initiation of regulatory hearing); § 16.24(e) (timing) and (f) (contents of notice); § 16.40 (Commissioner); § 16.60(a) (public process); § 16.95(b) (administrative decision and record for decision); and § 16.119 (Reconsideration and stay of action).
( 4 ) A decision by the presiding officer to affirm the directed food laboratory order is considered a final agency action under 5 U.S.C. 702.