alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 657 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 657

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      February 8, 2006.
Whereas America's Catholic schools are internationally acclaimed for their 
        academic excellence, but provide students more than a superior 
        scholastic education;
Whereas Catholic schools ensure a broad, values-added education emphasizing the 
        lifelong development of moral, intellectual, physical, and social values 
        in America's young people;
Whereas the total Catholic school student enrollment for the 2005-2006 academic 
        year is about 2.5 million and the student-teacher ratio is 15 to 1;
Whereas Catholic schools teach a diverse group of students;
Whereas more than 27 percent of school children enrolled in Catholic schools are 
        from minority backgrounds, and nearly 14 percent are non-Catholics;
Whereas Catholic schools produce students strongly dedicated to their faith, 
        values, families, and communities by providing an intellectually 
        stimulating environment rich in spiritual, character, and moral 
        development;
Whereas in the 1972 pastoral message concerning Catholic education, the National 
        Conference of Catholic Bishops stated: ``Education is one of the most 
        important ways by which the Church fulfills its commitment to the 
        dignity of the person and building of community. Community is central to 
        education ministry, both as a necessary condition and an ardently 
        desired goal. The educational efforts of the Church, therefore, must be 
        directed to forming persons-in-community; for the education of the 
        individual Christian is important not only to his solitary destiny, but 
        also the destinies of the many communities in which he lives.''; and
Whereas January 29 to February 4, 2006, has been designated as Catholic Schools 
        Week by the National Catholic Educational Association and the United 
        States Conference of Catholic Bishops: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals of Catholic Schools Week, an event co-
        sponsored by the National Catholic Educational Association and the 
        United States Conference of Catholic Bishops and established to 
        recognize the vital contributions of America's thousands of Catholic 
        elementary and secondary schools; and
            (2) congratulates Catholic schools, students, parents, and teachers 
        across the Nation for their ongoing contributions to education, and for 
        the key role they play in promoting and ensuring a brighter, stronger 
        future for this Nation.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D 19

- 0166

_____________________________

J AMES J OHNSON
,

Appellant,

v.

F LORIDA D EPARTMENT OF C ORRECTIONS
,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Hamilton County

. Andrew J. Decker, III , Judge

.

February 28, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.

Upon consideration of Appellant’s response to the Court’s order of January 14, 2019, the Court has determined that the appeal is untimely.

In order to timely invoke the Court’s appellate jurisdiction, a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of re ndition of the order to be reviewed. Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(b). The thirtieth day following rendition of the order on appeal was January 2, 2019. Thus, the notice of appeal, filed on January 3, 2019, failed to invoke the Court’s appellate jurisdiction in a timely manner. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.2 R OBERTS
, W ETHERELL
, and M AKAR
, JJ., concur

.

_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331

.

_____________________________

James Johnson, pro se

, Appellant.

No appearance for Appellee.
§ 1400.863 How is the fact-finding proceeding conducted? ( a ) The fact-finding proceeding is conducted in accordance with PAM's suspension and debarment program fact-finding procedures, a copy of which is provided to the respondent.
( b ) The fact-finding official for DOI debarment proceedings is the DOI Debarment Program Director, unless the Suspending and Debarring Official designates another DOI official to serve as the fact-finding official.
( c ) The fact-finding proceeding is undertaken in accordance with 2 CFR 180.840. ( 1 ) The reporters' fees and other direct costs associated with the fact-finding proceeding are borne by the bureau(s) or office(s) initiating the debarment action, except in the case of actions initiated by the OIG.
( 2 ) For actions initiated by the OIG, the costs are borne by the bureau(s) and/or office(s) out of which the matter arose.
( 3 ) A transcribed record of the fact-finding proceedings is available to the respondent as provided at 2 CFR 180.840(b).
( d ) The fact-finding official provides written findings of fact and the hearing record to the Suspending and Debarring Official. The fact-finding official files the original copy of the transcribed record of the fact-finding proceedings with the administrative record.
Now there is a F

to Fil

Zero W

Does your Form 9

qualifications?

No Withholdi

No Deposits

No Taxes to R

If you answered YE

Form 941 over the 

For your Privacy an

You will need 

reported on l

third quarter 

941TeleFile Ta

You will be re

return by ent

ty number an

your last nam

should corres

keypad. 

To Assure Filing is C

When the cal

mation numb

retain this nu

Dial 1-800-583-53

prompt. The pho

hours a day 7 day

Consi

ww

Publication 3950 (Rev. 1-2

.............
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997    
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       8,806,452
<SECURITIES>                                 2,488,616
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,005,396
<ALLOWANCES>                                   206,385
<INVENTORY>                                    509,328
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,275,982      
<PP&E>                                      10,725,294     
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,200,281   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,967,455     
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,847,356   
<BONDS>                                        577,548 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        49,417
<OTHER-SE>                                  20,215,730      
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,967,455        
<SALES>                                     15,804,822         
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,804,822         
<CGS>                                        5,076,331         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,076,331         
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0      
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               121,768     
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (32,207)      
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,296,808)       
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (633,027)     
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (663,781)     
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0     
<CHANGES>                                            0 
<NET-INCOME>                                 (663,781)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.13)
        
                                  


</TABLE>
§ 719.34 What documentation must the contractor provide to Department Counsel when it seeks permission to enter a settlement agreement? The contractor must provide a written statement to the Department Counsel that includes the following information, as applicable: ( a ) The amount of any proposed monetary settlement payment.
( b ) Titles and docket numbers associated with the case(s) for which the contractor is seeking approval to settle;
( c ) The procedural history of the case(s) or issue(s);
( d ) A narrative description of the legal claims or allegations at issue in the matter and any background information that explains events that precipitated the initiation of the matter;
( e ) A description of the history of the settlement discussions;
( f ) A description of the terms of the proposed settlement agreement or requested settlement authority and the rationale for the contractor entering into the proposed agreement;
( g ) If the proposed total monetary settlement amount would be allocated among multiple plaintiffs, a list of the plaintiffs and the amount of money each would receive pursuant to the proposed settlement agreement as well as an explanation as to why the settlement amount is different for any particular plaintiff, if appropriate;
( h ) A description as to why settlement of the matter is in the best interest of the Department; and
( i ) Any additional supporting documents requested by Department Counsel.
#### § 111.55 What are the requirements to implement a production and process control system?

You must implement a system of production and process controls that covers all stages of manufacturing, packaging, labeling, and holding of the dietary supplement to ensure the quality of the dietary supplement and that the dietary supplement is packaged and labeled as specified in the master manufacturing record.
# EUR-Lex - 31992D0092 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31992D0092

**92/92/EEC: Commission Decision of 9 January 1992 laying down the requirements relating to equipment and structure of dispatch and purification centres for live bivalve molluscs, for which derogations may be granted **

*
Official Journal L 034 , 11/02/1992 P. 0034 - 0035 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 40 P. 0137 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 40 P. 0137 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 9 January 1992 laying down the requirements relating to equipment and structure of dispatch and purification centres for live bivalve molluscs, for which derogations may be granted (92/92/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 91/492/EEC of 15 July 1991 laying down the health conditions for the production and the placing on the market of live bivalve molluscs (1), and in particular Article 5 thereof,

Whereas, in accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 5 (1) (a) of Directive 91/492/EEC, Member States may, for the requirements relating to equipment and structures laid down in Chapter IV of the Annex to the aforesaid Directive, grant to dispatch and purification centres a further period within which to comply with the conditions of approval set out in that Chapter IV, subject to the express condition that live bivalve molluscs coming from such centres meet the hygiene standards set by Directive 91/492/EEC;

Whereas it is up to the Commission to fix, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 12 of Directive 91/492/EEC, the requirements relating to equipment and structures for which such derogations may be granted;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The requirements relating to equipment and structures laid down in Chapter IV of the Annex to Directive 91/492/EEC for which derogations may be granted are laid down in the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States. Done at Brussels, 9 January 1992. For the Commission

Ray MAC SHARRY

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 268, 24. 9. 1991, p. 1.

ANNEX

REQUIREMENTS LAID DOWN IN CHAPTER IV OF THE ANNEX TO DIRECTIVE 91/492/EEC FOR WHICH DEROGATIONS MAY BE GRANTED

For the following requirements, derogations may be granted:

1. I, 1(a) insofar as the construction of buildings or facilities is concerned, as well as (b), (c), (d) and (e).

2. I, 2 insofar as the number of changing rooms is concerned, and 5.

3. II, 6 insofar as a separate area for the storage of waste products is concerned, provided products cannot be contaminated by waste or leakage therefrom.

4. II, 7 provided products are sheltered from the sun and the elements and from any source of dirt or contamination.

5. III, 1 insofar as water-storage containers and the slope of the base of purification tanks are concerned.
----

CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO

18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlantis Business DevelopmentCorporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005,as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I Christopher Dubeau, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

By:                                    ***/s/ Christopher Dubeau***

                                           Christopher Dubeau

                                           CEO

                                           Dated:   August 15, 2005

----
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between James Stewart, Respondent, and Yellow Freight Systems, Inc., Appellant. American Arbitration Association, Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated March 5,1980, dismissed as academic. The judgment was superseded by an order of the same court, dated July 7, 1980, which, upon reargument and renewal, adhered to the original determination. Order dated July 7,1980 affirmed. No opinion. Petitioner is awarded one bill of $50 costs and disbursements to cover both appeals. Damiani, J. P., Gulotta, Martuscello and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
IV 

House Calendar No. 195 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 868 

[Report No. 109–502] 

Providing for consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 861) declaring that 

the United States will prevail in the Global War on Terror, the struggle 

to protect freedom from the terrorist adversary. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 14, 2006 

Mr. COLE, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 861) 

declaring that the United States will prevail in the Global 

War on Terror, the struggle to protect freedom from 

the terrorist adversary. 

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution 

2 it shall be in order without intervention of any point of 

3 order to consider in the House the resolution (H. Res. 

4 861) declaring that the United States will prevail in the 

5 Global War on Terror, the struggle to protect freedom 

6 from the terrorist adversary. The resolution shall be conVerDate Aug 31 2005 23:32 Jun 14, 2006 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR868.RH HR868

sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

HRES 868 RH

1 sidered as read. The previous question shall be considered 

2 as ordered on the resolution and preamble to final adop3 tion without intervening motion or demand for division of 

4 the question except: (1) ten hours of debate equally di5 vided and controlled among the chairman and ranking mi6 nority member of the Committee on International Rela7 tions, the chairman and ranking minority member of the 

8 Committee on Armed Services, the chairman and ranking 

9 minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary, and 

10 the chairman and ranking minority member of the Perma11 nent Select Committee on Intelligence; and (2) one motion 

12 to recommit which may not include instructions. 

13 SEC. 2. During consideration of House Resolution 

14 861 pursuant to this resolution, notwithstanding the oper15 ation of the previous question, the Chair may postpone 

16 further consideration of the resolution to a time des17 ignated by the Speaker. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS

sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 195 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 868 

[Report No. 109

–502] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the resolution (H. 

to protect freedom from the terrorist adversary. prevail in the Global War on Terror, the struggle Res. 861) declaring that the United States will 

JUNE 14, 2006 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
Exhibit No. 21.1

                          Subsidiaries of BNCCORP, Inc.


The  following is a list of all  subsidiaries  of the Company,  including  their
state of incorporation or organization.


                 Name                                    Incorporated In
------------------------------------------   -----------------------------------
BNC National Bank                                        National Bank

BNC Insurance, Inc. (a Subsidiary of
  BNC National Bank)                                     North Dakota

Milne Scali & Company, Inc. (a Subsidiary
     of BNC Insurance, Inc.)                                Arizona

BNC Asset Management, Inc., (a Subsidiary
     of BNC National Bank)                               North Dakota

Bismarck Properties, Inc.                                North Dakota

BNC Capital Trust I                                     Delaware Trust

BNC Statutory Trust II                                 Connecticut Trust
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 274 

Recognizing Miguel Contreras, on the occasion of his death, for his tireless 

work on behalf of immigrants and working people. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 11, 2005 

Ms. LINDA T. SA ́NCHEZ of California (for herself, Ms. SOLIS, Mrs. 

NAPOLITANO, Mr. GRIJALVA, Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California, Mr. 

BECERRA, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Ms. HARMAN, Mr. BACA, Mr. SHERMAN, Ms. WATSON, Mr. BERMAN, Mr. HONDA, Mr. WAXMAN, Ms. ZOE

LOFGREN of California, Mr. FILNER, and Mrs. CAPPS) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Government 

Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing Miguel Contreras, on the occasion of his death, 

for his tireless work on behalf of immigrants and working 

people. 

Whereas Miguel Contreras, as Secretary and Treasurer of the 

Los Angeles County Federation of Labor, reenergized the 

labor movement in the Los Angeles area by bringing 

unions and workers together across craft, class, and income divisions; 

Whereas Contreras gave special pride to Latino workers and 

fought tirelessly for the rights of immigrants; 
2 

•HRES 274 IH 

Whereas Contreras gave voice to all working people in Los 

Angeles; 

Whereas Contreras rebuilt the progressive political coalition 

in Los Angeles by building bridges across various communities, including Latino, African-American, Asian-Pacific American, and Native American communities; 

Whereas Contreras began his life working in the fields of 

Southern California alongside his immigrant parents and 

ended it fighting along side working families as one of 

the highest ranking and most influential labor leaders in 

the United States; and 

Whereas the example set by Miguel Contreras and the lessons 

he taught reach far beyond the borders of California, and 

they will endure as long as men and women struggle for 

justice: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) has learned with profound sorrow of the 

3 death of Miguel Contreras on May 6, 2005, and ex4 tends condolences to his family; 

5 (2) expresses its deep gratitude to Miguel 

6 Contreras for working tirelessly on behalf of immi7 grants and working people; and 

8 (3) recognizes Miguel Contreras as a role model 

9 for generations to come in California and throughout 

10 the entire Nation. 

Æ
2132.806 Contract clause.

The clause set forth in 2152.232-72 shall be inserted in all FEGLI Program contracts.

Parent topic: Subpart 2132.8 - Assignment of Claims
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 13871-000—Colorado]

In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's regulations, 18 CFR part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office of Energy Projects has reviewed the application for exemption from licensing for the Humphreys Hydroelectric Project, to be located on Goose Creek (in the Rio Grande River basin), near the town of South Fork, in Mineral County, Colorado, and has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA). In the EA, Commission staff analyze the potential environmental effects of the proposed project and conclude that issuing an exemption for the proposed project, with appropriate environmental measures, would not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment.

                    A copy of the EA is on file with the Commission and is available for public inspection. The EA may also be viewed on the Commission's Web site at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*                     using the “eLibrary” link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support at                     *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov*                     or toll-free at (866) 208-3676, or for TTY, (202) 502-8659.                

                    You may also register online at                     *http://www.ferc.gov/​esubscribenow.htm*                     to be notified via e-mail of new filings and issuances related to this or other pending projects. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support at                     *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov*                     or toll-free at 1-866-208-3676, or for TTY, (202) 502-8659.                

                    Please contact Carolyn Templeton by telephone at (202) 502-8785 or by e-mail at                     *carolyn.templeton@ferc.gov*                     if you have any questions.                

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-32842 Filed 12-29-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P