alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration

# AGENCY:

Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice to reestablish committee.

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given that the Secretary of Agriculture has reestablished the Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration (GIPSA) Grain Inspection Advisory Committee (Advisory Committee). The Secretary of Agriculture has determined that the Advisory Committee is necessary and in the public interest.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Terri L. Henry, Designated Federal Official, GIPSA, USDA, Rm. 1633-S, 1400 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20250-3604; Telephone (202) 205-8281; Fax (202) 690-2755; E-mail                         *Terri.L.Henry@usda.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The purpose of the Advisory Committee is to provide advice to the Administrator of GIPSA with respect to the implementation of the U.S. Grain Standards Act (7 U.S.C. 71*et seq.*). Information about the Advisory Committee is available on the GIPSA Web site at                     *http://www.gipsa.usda.gov.*                     Under the section, “I Want To * * *,” select “Learn about the Grain Inspection Advisory Committee.”                

Alan R. Christian,

Acting Administrator, Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2010-32777 Filed 12-28-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-KD-P
###### Editorial Note on Part 112

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 112 appear at 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016.

#### § 112.53 What prohibitions apply regarding use of human waste?

You may not use human waste for growing covered produce, except sewage sludge biosolids used in accordance with the requirements of 40 CFR part 503, subpart D, or equivalent regulatory requirements.
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-08-30T22:56:16-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002)

 

In connection with thefiling by Hospitality Properties Trust (the “Company”) of the Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the “Report”), eachof the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge:

 

1.                                       The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, and

 

2.                                       The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  Barry M.Portnoy          |   | /s/  John G. Murray                    |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Barry  M. Portnoy             |   | John  G. Murray                        |   |
| Managing  Trustee             |   | President  and Chief Operating Officer |   |
|                          |   |                                   |
|                          |   |                                   |   |
|                          |   |                                   |   |
| /s/  Adam D. Portnoy          |   | /s/  Mark L. Kleifges                  |   |
| Adam  D. Portnoy              |   | Mark  L. Kleifges                      |   |
| Managing  Trustee             |   | Treasurer  and Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                          |   |                                   |
|                          |   |                                   |   |
| Date:  February 28, 2008 |   |                                   |   |

 

----
<PAGE>
 
                                                                     EXHIBIT 11
 
                             RAPTOR SYSTEMS, INC.
 
                  COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
                     (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              THREE MONTHS         YEAR
                                                 ENDED             ENDED
                                              DECEMBER 31,     DECEMBER 31,
                                             ---------------  ----------------
                                              1996     1995    1996     1995
                                             -------  ------  -------  -------
<S>                                          <C>      <C>     <C>      <C>
Common stock outstanding, beginning of
 period....................................   12,657   2,065    2,450    2,065
Weighted average "cheap" stock.............      --    2,630      --     2,630
Weighted average Series B Redeemable
 Convertible Preferred Stock...............      --    2,443      --     2,443
Weighted average number of shares issued...      375     --     9,006      --
Weighted average common stock equivalents..    2,288     --     2,331      --
Less: assumed purchase of treasury shares..     (287)    (91)    (147)     (91)
                                             -------  ------  -------  -------
Weighted average number of common and
 common equivalent shares outstanding......   15,033   7,047   13,640    7,047
                                             =======  ======  =======  =======
Net income (loss)..........................  $ 1,375  $ (984) $ 1,801  $(2,686)
                                             =======  ======  =======  =======
Net income (loss) per common and common
 equivalent share..........................  $   .09  $ (.14) $   .13  $  (.38)
                                             =======  ======  =======  =======
</TABLE>
--------
(1) All common share amounts have been restated to reflect a 3 for 1 stock
    split on December 15, 1995.
(2) In accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting
    Bulletin No. 83 ("SAB No. 83"), all common and common equivalent shares
    and other potentially dilutive instruments (including stock options and
    the redeemable convertible preferred stock) issued during the twelve month
    period prior to the initial filing date in December 1995 of the
    Registration Statement for the Company's initial public offering have been
    included in the calculation as if they were outstanding for all periods
    presented for 1995. The common equivalent shares for stock options were
    determined using the treasury stock method at an assumed initial public
    offering price of $11.00 per share. The redeemable convertible preferred
    stock was included on an as-if converted basis.
(3) Fully diluted net income per share is the same as primary net income per
    share.
(4) Common stock equivalents only included when the effect of their inclusion
    would be dilutive.
427 A.2d 1205

#### Ferrell et al., Appellants, v. Gill et al.

Argued September 10, 1979.

Allen L. Feingold, for appellants;

Phillip B. Silverman, submitted a brief on behalf of appellees.

*640Before PRICE, WIEAND and VAN der VOORT, JJ.*

*

 Judge Donald E. Wieand is sitting by special designation.

Order affirmed.

PRICE, J., filed a memorandum concurring statement.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 469 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 469

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         July 24, 2017.
    Resolved, That the Clerk of the House of Representatives request the Senate 
to return to the House the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 76) entitled ``Granting 
the consent and approval of Congress for the Commonwealth of Virginia, the State 
of Maryland, and the District of Columbia to a enter into a compact relating to 
the establishment of the Washington Metrorail Safety Commission.''.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
OFFICERS' ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE



     The  undersigned,   Managing  Director  and  Director,   respectively,   of
Residential Funding Corporation (the "Master Servicer"), pursuant to the various
Pooling and  Servicing  Agreements  (the  "Agreements")  under which RFC acts as
Master  Servicer or Manager,  which  agreements  require an annual  statement of
compliance  to be made to the  Certificate  holders  by  officers  of the Master
Servicer, hereby certify that:

     (i)  a review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
          calendar year and of  performance  under the  Agreements has been made
          under the undersigned officers' supervision;

     (ii) to the  best of the  undersigned  officers'  knowledge,  based on such
          review,  the Master  Servicer has  fulfilled  its  obligations  in all
          material respects throughout such year;

    (iii) to the best of each  undersigned  officers'  knowledge,  based on such
          review,  each  Subservicer  and Servicer has fulfilled its obligations
          under its servicing agreement in all material respects; and

     (iv) the Company has fully  complied  with the  provisions of Article II of
          the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

Dated:  March 30, 2000




/s/ Bob Appel                                        /s/ Karen Zaslansky
Bob Appel                                            Karen Zaslansky
Managing Director                                    Director







<PAGE>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 248 (Tuesday, December 28, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 81644]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32437]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES


Meeting of the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Rules of 
Bankruptcy Procedure

AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the United States Advisory Committee on 
Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Advisory Committee on Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure will 
hold a two-day meeting. The meeting will be open to public observation 
but not participation.

DATES: April 7-8, 2011. Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Fairmont Hotel, 950 Mason Street, San Francisco, CA.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peter G. McCabe, Secretary, Rules 
Committee Support Office, Administrative Office of the United States 
Courts, Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 502-1820.

    Dated: December 21, 2010.
Peter G. McCabe,
Rules Committee Support Office.
[FR Doc. 2010-32437 Filed 12-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210-55-M
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7276
RICKY A. PIERCE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RUSSELL GINN, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-95-1033-5-F) Submitted: April 17, 1997 Decided: April 25, 1997 Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ricky A. Pierce, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court'sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Pierce v. Ginn , No. CA-95-1033-5-F (E.D.N.C. Aug. 2, 1996). Appellant's motions for appointment of counsel are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
PGI 252.1 -INSTRUCTIONS FOR USING PROVISIONS AND CLAUSES    **Parent topic:** PGI Part 252 - CLAUSESPGI 252.103 Identification of provisions and clauses.       (c) Local provisions and clauses developed by departments and agencies for a single-use intended to meet the needs of an individual acquisition shall be identified by the title, date, and name of the department or agency that developed the local clause. For example, if “X” Agency negotiated a single-use clause for use of special government facilities during discussions, such clause would be identified in the contract as follows:          “Special Use of Government Facilities (DATE) X Agency”          (d)(1)(A) Local provisions and clauses that will be used on a repetitive basis shall be identified by—          (*1*) The chapter assigned to the department or agency under Title 48 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR);          (*2*) FAR subpart “52.2”;          (*3*) The applicable FAR part;          (*4*) A four-digit sequential number in the 9000 series for the suffix (see DFARS 252.101(b)(2)(ii)(B));          (*5*) Title; and          (*6*) Date.          (B) For example, if “Y” Agency is assigned a CFR chapter number 99, and has developed a provision regarding an evaluation factor for past performance to be used on a repetitive basis in negotiated acquisitions, such provision would be identified as follows:          “9952.215-9XXX Past Performance Evaluation Factor (DATE)”
# EUR-Lex - 31993R2918 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31993R2918

**Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2918/93 of 22 October 1993 amending Regulation (EEC) No 3076/78 on the importation of hops from non-member countries **

*
Official Journal L 264 , 23/10/1993 P. 0037 - 0037 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 53 P. 0104 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 53 P. 0104 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EEC) No 2918/93 of 22 October 1993 amending Regulation (EEC) No 3076/78 on the importation of hops from non-member countries

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1696/71 of 26 July 1971 on the common organization of the market in hops (1), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 3124/92 (2), and in particular Article 5 (3) thereof,

Whereas, in the case of imported hops which do not satisfy the minimum marketing requirements mentioned in the Annex to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 890/78 of 28 April 1978 laying down detailed rules for the certification of hops (3), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 2265/91 (4), the phrase 'put into free circulation` in the second subparagraph of Article 7a of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3076/78 (5), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 717/93 (6), could cause difficulties for national administrations in that the quality checks take place at the point of destination and not at the point of entry, in other words well after the customs clearance formalities have been completed; whereas by the time checks take place the imported hops have probably already been mixed with hops of Community origin, thereby making it impossible to retrace their origin and revoke the customs clearance procedure; whereas the second subparagraph of Article 7a of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3076/78 on the importation of hops from non-member countries should therefore be amended;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Hops,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The second subparagraph of Article 7a of Regulation (EEC) No 3076/78 is replaced by the following:

'If the competent authorities of the Member States find that the samples examined do not satisfy the minimum marketing requirements mentioned above, the corresponding consignments may not be marketed in the Community.`

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 October 1993.

For the Commission

René STEICHEN

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 175, 4. 8. 1971, p. 1.

(2) OJ No L 313, 30. 10. 1992, p. 1.

(3) OJ No L 117, 29. 4. 1978, p. 43.

(4) OJ No L 208, 30. 7. 1991, p. 22.

(5) OJ No L 367, 28. 12. 1978, p. 17.

(6) OJ No L 74, 27. 3. 1993, p. 45.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2017010EN.01001001.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 14.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 10/10 |

---

Corrigendum to Eleventh Council Directive 89/666/EEC of 21 December 1989 concerning disclosure requirements in respect of branches opened in a Member State by certain types of company governed by the law of another State

(
[Official Journal of the European Union L 395 of 30 December 1989](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_1989_395_R_TOC)
)

On page 38, Article 8, point (j):

for:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘(j) | the accounting documents in accordance with Article 7;’, |

read:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘(j) | the accounting documents in accordance with Article 9;’. |

---
#### Jamaica Savings Bank, Respondent, v Alley Spring Apartments Corp. et al., Defendants, and City Partners et al., Appellants.

Two orders of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered April 21, 1980 and August 13, 1980, respectively, affirmed, with one bill of $50 costs and disbursements, on the opinion of Mr. Justice Graci at Special Term. Two orders of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered April 21, 1980 and August 13, 1980, respectively, affirmed, with one bill of $50 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Gibbons and Gulotta, JJ., concur.
###### Editorial Note on Part 10

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear at 68 FR 24879, May 9, 2003, and at 88 FR 45064, July 14, 2023.

#### § 10.19 Waiver, suspension, or modification of procedural requirements.

The Commissioner or a presiding officer may, either voluntarily or at the request of a participant, waive, suspend, or modify any provision in parts 12 through 16 applicable to the conduct of a public hearing by announcement at the hearing or by notice in advance of the hearing if no participant will be prejudiced, the ends of justice will thereby be served, and the action is in accordance with law.
# EUR-Lex - 31992R3800 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31992R3800

**Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3800/92 of 23 December 1992 amending Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff **

*
Official Journal L 384 , 30/12/1992 P. 0008 - 0008 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EEC) No 3800/92

of 23 December 1992

amending Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (1), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 2505/92 (2), and in particular Article 9 thereof,

Whereas in order to ensure uniform application of the combined nomenclature, it is necessary to adopt measures concerning the classification of footwear in relation to note 4 (a) to Chapter 64 of the combined nomenclature (CN); whereas for this purpose it is necessary to introduce an additional note to Chapter 64 of the combined nomenclature; whereas Annex I to Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 has to be amended accordingly;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Nomenclature Committee;

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The combined nomenclature contained in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 is hereby amended by the inclusion in Chapter 64 of the following addition note:

'Additional note

1. Within the meaning of note 4 (a), "reinforcements" is taken to mean all pieces of material (e.g., plastics or leather) which covers the external surface of the upper to give additional strength, whether or not also attached to the sole. After the removal of reinforcements, the visible material must have the characteristics of an upper and not lining.

Account is to be taken of sections covered by accessories and/or reinforcements when deciding on the composition of the upper.`

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 21st day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 23 December 1992. For the Commission

Christiane SCRIVENER

Member of the Commission